Folsom City Council
May 10, 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XIII. POPUTATION AND HOUSING
POPUTATION AND HOUSING:

Would the project:

Potentlal
lmpact
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
wlth
Mltlgatlon
Lcss Than
Slgnlllcant
lmpast lmpact
lIo
a) lnduce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
D
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
tr
Environmentol Setting
The proposed project includes the total construction of 253 new multi-family apartment units on two separate parcels, Lot 1, and Lot 6.

Evoluotion of Populolion ond Housing
Question a: Less than Significant. lmplementation of the project would result in the construction of 253 apartment units. The proposed project would accommodate the demand for housing and would not induce substantial growth in the City of Folsom. lt is anticipated that the project would generate between 253 and 665 new residents (assuming 2.63 people per unit, based on projected household size in 2035 [City of Folsom 2018]). The projected household size is for single family homes, which is anticipated to be larger than the apartment units within Lot 1 and Lot 6. Existing infrastructure in the area would not be expanded or extended as a result ofthe project. Lot 1 and Lot 5 would require the addition of main access driveways and emergency access driveways along the parcel boundaries; however, this addition would not impact the existing roadways within the vicinity of the project site.

Moreover, the population generated by the project is within the projected increase in population from planned growth as projected in the City's Housing Element. The impact would not be significant, and no mitigation would be required.

Questlon b and c: No lmpact. The proposed project would include the development of residential units on a currently undeveloped and vacant site. There are no existing residences on the project site; therefore, neither housing units nor people would be displaced, and no replacement housing would be required. There would be no impact and no mitigation would be necessary for questions b) and c).

City of Folsom 97 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES
PUBTIC SERVICES:

Would the proiect:

Potentlal
lmpact
less Than
Slgnlflcant
wlth
Mltlgatlon
less lhan
Slgnlficant
lmpact
No
lmpsct
Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physicalty altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? n tr
b) Police protection? n
c) Schools? n n
d) Parks? ! n
e) other public facilities? n I
Environmenlol Setting
The proposed project is in an area currently served by urban levels of all utilities and services. Public services provided by the City of Folsom in the project area include fire, police, school, library, and park services. The site is served by all public utilities including domestic water, wastewater treatment, and storm water utilities.

The City of Folsom Fire Department provides fire protection services. There are four stations within the City of Folsom. Station 37 is nearest to the project site; it is located at 70 Clarksville Road, approximately

0.76 miles north of the project site. The Fire Department responds to over 6,000 requests for service annually with an average of 15.4 per day. The City of Folsom Police Department is located at 46 Natoma Street, approximately 3-miles northwest of the project site.

The project site is located within the Folsom Cordova Unified School District and is within the attendance area for the Gold Ridge Elementary School, Sutter Middle School, and Folsom High School There are several parks near the project site, including Livermore Community, John Kemp Community Park, and Willow Hills Reservoir Community Park.

The Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (SMUD) would supply electricity to the project site. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) provides natural gas to the area and would provide natural gas to the project site.

The City of Folsom has a program of maintaining and upgrading existing utility and public services within the City. Similarly, all private utilities maintain and upgrade their systems as necessary for public convenience and necessity, and as technology changes.

City of Folsom 98 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Evoluollon of Publlc Servlces
Questions a,b, c, d, e: Less than Significant. The project site is within the urban area of Folsom, and there is no indication that public services are inadequate. The proposed project would increase fire and police protection service due to the addition of 253 apartment units, but the project would not substantially render the current service level to be inadequate. Additionally, the project would have the potential to increase service to schools and parks, butthe project would be required to pay development impact fees as well as park fees in order to accommodate for the new development, as required by the City of Folsom. Construction and operation of the proposed project would not require the construction or expansion of parks and other public facilities or result in the degradation of those facilities. Because there are no unique aspects of the project that would render the current service level to be inadequate, no new public facilities would be necessary to serve the proposed project. The impact of the project would be less than significant, and mitigation would not be necessary.

City of Folsom 99 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XV. RECREATION
RECREATION:

Woutd the project:

Potentlal
lmpact
lcss Than
Slgnlflcant
wlth
Mltlgatlon
Less Than
Slgnncant
lmpact
llo
lmpact
a) lncrease the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
tr u
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
n
Environmentol Setling
The Folsom Parks and Recreation Department provides and maintains a full range of recreational activities and park facilities for the community. There are several parks near the project site, including the Livermore Community Park, John Kemp Community, and Willow Hills Reservoir Community Park.

The proposed project would include on-site recreation facilities, including pools and clubhouses, dog parks, and sitting and picnic areas for use by the residents.

Evoluolion of Recreollon
Question a: Less than Significant. One component of the proposed project is to change the land use designation of Lot 1 and Lot 6 from commercial/industrial (lND)to residential (MHD). ln total, the associated number of residents would not result in a substantial population increase to the City of Folsom population. An increase of 253 apartment units would generate between 253 and 655 new residents (assuming 2.63 people per unit, based on projected household size in 2035 [City of Folsom 20181). The project pioposes several recreational facilities on both parcels for use by the residences.

Each apartment complex would have a pool, a fire pit, a dog park, a seating area, and a picnic area. The complex on Lot 1 would have a 3-story, 5,700 sf clubhouse, and the complex at Lot 6 would have a onestory, 3,150-sf clubhouse. The Folsom Municipal Code set a standard of S-acres of parkland per 1,000 residents (City of Folsom Section 4.10.020). The City of Folsom Parks and Recreation Master Plan estimated that for a build-out population of 94,400 resldents, there would be a total build-out of 586,6 acres of parkland (City of Folsom 2015).

Based on the projects distant location from a park and the addition of proposed recreational facilities that would be provided for the residents, the proposed project would not result in a substantial increase in the use of demand for neighborhood or regional parks, or other recreational facilities. Further, the City of Folsom charges impact fees to all new developments to abate a project's impacts on parks and recreational facilities in the City. These impact fees are also used to address the identified future needs for the City's park system. The impact fees and the associated funded improvements would reduce any lmpacts from the project to less than significant, and no mitigation would be necessary.

Question b: less than Significant. The proposed project includes the construction of a pool, picnic area, dog park, and seating area within each apartment complex, for use by the residents. The complex on Lot City of Folsom 100 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
1 would have a 3-story, 6,700-sf clubhouse while the complex on Lot 6 would have a one-story, 3,150-sf clubhouse. The facilities would be for exclusive use by the residents of the proposed project.

Additionally, the proposed project would be subject to park development impact fees established and collected by the City's Parks and Recreation Department to ensure that the City has sufficient park land.

The construction of new recreational facilities andlor parks to meet the recreational demands of the City has been evaluated for environmental impacts through the General Plan process. Payment of the Parks and Recreation Department development impact fee offsets the potential for any significant impact related to recreation stemming from the proposed project and mitigation is not necessary. With the implementation of the impact fee, impacts to recreation would be less than significant.

City of Folsom 101 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
TRANSPORTATION AND TMFFIC:

Would the project:

Potcntlal
lmpact
less Than
Slgnlflcant
wlth
Mhlgatlon
LelsThan
Sltnlflcant
lmpact lmpact
I{o
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
tr I n
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management
program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency
for designated roads or highways?
n tr
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
n I
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e,9., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
n n
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? n
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
tr
Transportation and traffic were evaluated in the Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Transportation lmpact Study as presented in Appendix H.

Environmentol Seftlng
Study Scenarios
Four scenarios were identified for inclusion in this Transportation lmpact Study through consultation with City of Folsom staff. The study determines the weekday AM peak-hour and PM peak-hour level of service (LOS) at study intersections under the following scenarios:

1. Existing 2021 without Project Condition;

2. Existing 2021 with Project Condition;
3, Existing Plus Approved Projects (EPAP) 2026 without Project Condition;

4. EPAP 2025 with Project Condition;

5. Cumulative 2035 without Project Condition; and,

5. Cumulative 2035 with Project Condition.

City of Folsom toz March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Existing 2021, and Existing 2021with Project Condition
Analysis of the existing condition reflects the traffic volumes and roadway geometry at the time the study began. These two scenarios (with and without the project) quantify performance measures, serve as a known reference point for those familiar with the study area, and identify project related impacts anticipated to occur if the project opened in 2021.

EPAP 2026 Condition, and EPAP 2026 with Proiect Condition EPAP scenarios, with and without the project, analyze conditions with the addition of traffic from approved and reasonably foreseeable projects that affect study intersections and segments.

These scenarios are intended to reflect anticipated traffic approximately five years into the future, when the project could reasonably be anticipated to be constructed. This "phasing analysis" is intended to assist the City of Folsom in phasing of improvements at study intersections which may be necessary to accommodate traffic from all approved and anticipated tentative maps over the next five years.

Cumulative 2035 Condition, and Cumulative 2035 with ProJect Condition Cumulative scenarios, with and without the project, analyze anticipated conditions at the General Plan 2035 horizon year. These scenarios are intended to reflect anticipated traffic from Folsom Ranch, and shifts in traffic patterns anticipated after construction of two new interchanges and US Highway 50 overcrossings.

Roadway Systems
Brief descriptions of the key roadways serving the project site are provided below:
lron Point Road is an east-west arterial roadway with a raised median that runs from Folsom Boulevard to the eastern city limit along the north side of US Highway 50. Within the vicinity of the Project, lron Point Road has six lanes, bike lanes, sidewalk, curb, and gutter. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Turn pockets are provided at intersections. a Oak Avenue Parkway is a north-south arterial that extends from Willow Creek Drive to lron Point Road. lt is a four-lane urban arterial road between Willow Creek Drive and Blue Ravine Road. lt is a six-lane urban arterial road between Blue Ravine Road and Riley Street. lt is a fourlane urban arterial road between Riley Street and lron Point Road. Oak Avenue Parkway will be extended across US Highway 50 into Folsom Ranch and a new interchange will be constructed prior to the cumulative analysis scenarios.

Rowberry Drive is a north-south two-lane local road that runs northward from the Kaiser Permanente Folsom Medical Offices into neighborhoods to the north of lron Point Road. A future extension of Rowberry across US Highway 50 to Folsom Ranch is planned for the future.

Broadstone Parkway in the project vicinity is a four-lane east-west arterial, that wraps around the back of the Palladio shopping center from lron Point Road to connect with Empire Ranch Road near the Sacramento-El Dorado county line. Broadstone Parkway has bike lanes, sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Turn pockets are provided at intersections. a
I
City of Folsom 103 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
a
East Bidwell Street runs through the City of Folsom from White Rock Road to Riley Street, East Bidwell Street becomes Scott Road south of US Highway 50. Near the Project area, East Bidwell Street is a six-lane arterial roadway with bike lanes, sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Turn pockets are provided at intersections. The speed limit on East Bidwell Street north of US Highway 50 is 45 mph.

Prairie City Road is a north-south arterial that extends from Blue Ravine Road to White Rock Road, north of Blue Ravine Road it is called SibleyStreet. lt is a five-lane urban arterial road between Blue Ravine Road and lron Point Road. Prairie City Road is a six-lane urban arterial road between lron Point Road and US Highway 50. lt is a two-lane rural road between US Highway 50 and White Rock Road.

Study lntersections
There are twenty study segments on US Highway 50 (Table 14) and seventeen study intersections (Table 15). The Oak Avenue Parkway interchange will be constructed by the cumulative analysis year, resulting in changes to some study US Highway 50 segments.

Table 14. US 50
US Highway 50 Segment Segment
Type
Applicable
Years
US Highway 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge All US Highway 50 westbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge All US Highway 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge All US Hiehway 50 westbound East Bidwell to Oak Ave Basic All US Highway 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramp Diverge 2035 US Hiehwav 50 westbound Oak Avenue lop onramp Merge 2035 US Highway 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp to Prairie City Rd offramp
Weave 2035
US Highway 50 westbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 202u2026 US Highway 50 westbound Prairie City loop onramp MerAe Ail US Hiehwav 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge All US Highway 50 eastbound Prairie City offramp Diverge All US Hiehway 50 eastbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge All US Highway 50 eastbound Prairie Citv flv-over onramp Merge 202L12026 US Hiehwav 50 eastbound Prairie City flv-over onramp to Oak Ave offramp Weave 2035 US Highway 50 eastbound Oak Avenue loop onramp Merge 2035 US Hiehway 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp Merge 2035 US Hiehwav 50 eastbound Oak Avenue to East Bidwell Basic All US Highway 50 eastbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge All US Highway 50 eastbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge All US Hiehwav 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merse All City of Folsom 104 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Table 15. lntersections and Control
*Two-way Stop Control
Level of Service Methodology
Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative indication of the level of delay and congestion experienced by motorists using an intersection. Levels-of-service are designated by the letters A through F, with A being the best conditions and F being the worst (high delay and congestion). Calculation methodologies, measures of performance, and thresholds for each letter grade differ for road segments, signalized intersections, and unsignalized intersections. Based on guidance from City of Folsom staff, the following procedures described below for intersection and segment traffic operations analysis were selected for this study.

Intersedion Troflic Operotions Anolysis
Sienalized lntersections
The methodology from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 5th Edition 2, was used to analyze signalized intersections. LOS can be characterized for the entire intersection, each approach, or by lane group.

Control delay alone (the weighted average delay for all vehicles entering the intersection) is used to characterize LOS for the entire intersection or an approach. Control delay and volume to capacity ratio are used to characterize LOS for lane groups. The average delay criteria used to determine the LOS at signalized intersections is presented in Table 15. The HCM 2010 methodology is used as the primary method. HCM 2OOO methods are only utilized where the signal phasing is incompatible with HCM 2010 methods.

Control lntersection
1, Prairie Citv Rd/US Highway 50 eastbound ramps Signal

2. Prairie Citv Rd/US Hiehwav 50 westbound ramps Sienal

3. Prairie City Rd/American Aggregates Rd Signal

4. Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd Signal

5. lron Pt Road/Grover Rd Sienal
6, lron Pt Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy Sienal
7, lron Pt RoadlWest Kaiser access road TWSC*

8. lron Pt Road/Rowberry Way Signal

9. lron Pt Road/Safe Credit Union access TWSC*

10. lron Pt Road/Broadstone Pkwy Signal

11. lron Pt Road/East Bidwell St Signal

12. Est Bidwell SI/US Hiehway 50 westbound ramps Sienal

13. East Bidwell St/US Highway 50 eastbound ramps Sienal

14. APN O72-372O-O23 "Lot 5" access TWSC*

15. APN O72-372O-O23 TWSC'I "Lot 1" access

15. Oak Avenue Pkwv/US Hiehway 50 westbound ramps (2035 only) Sisnal

17. Oak Avenue Pkwy/US Highway 50 eastbound ramps Sisnal {2035 Only) City of Folsom 1os March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Table 16. Level of Service Criteria for lntersections
Note 1: Weighted average of delay on all approaches. This is the measure used by the Highway Capacity Manual to determine LOS. Any movement with a volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c) greater than 1.0 is considered to be LOS F.

Source: Transportation Research Board (2016) Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, Washington D.C.

Unslrnallzed lntersectlons
The methodology from HCM 6th Edition is used for the analysis of unsignalized intersections. At an unsignalized intersection, most of the main street traffic is un-delayed, and by definition has acceptable conditions. The main street left-turn movements and the minor street movements are all susceptible to delay of varying degrees. Generally, the higher the main street traffic volumes, the higher the delay for the minor movements. Separate methods are utilized for Two-Way Stop-Controlled (TWSC) intersections and All-Way Stop-Controlled (AWSC) intersections.

TWSC: The methodology for analysis of two-way stop-controlled intersections calculates an average total delay per vehicle for each minor street movement and for the major street leftturn movements, based on the availability of adequate gaps in the main street through traffic, A LOS designation is assigned to individual movements or combinations of movements (in the case of shared lanes) based upon delay, it is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Unsignalized intersection LOS reported herein is for each movement (or group of movements) based upon a
Descrlotlon
Average Delayr
(Sec. /Vehlcle.l
Level of
Service
A Very Low Delay: This level-of-service occurs when progression is extremely lavorable, and most vehicles arrive during a green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all.
s 10.0
B Minimal Delays: This level-of-service generally occurs with good progression, short 10.1-20.0 cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than at LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay.

Acceptable Delay: Delay increases due to only fair progression, longer cycle engths, or both. lndividual cycle failures (to service oll woiting vehiclesl may begin lo appear at this level of service. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, lhough many still pass through the intersection without stopping, c 20.1-35.0
D Approaching Unstablefiolerable Delays: The influence of congestion becomes nrore noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorabie progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. lndividual cycle failures are noticeable.

35.1-55.0
E Unstable Operation/Significant Delays: This is considered by many agencies the rpper limit of acceptable delays. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios, lndividual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.

55.1-80.0
F Excessive Delays: This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often rccurs with oversaturation (i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the ntersection). lt may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual :ycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such Jelay levels.
> 80.0
or v,/c >1.0
City of Folsom 106 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
the respective average delay per vehicle. Table 17 presents the average delay criteria used to determine the LOS at TWSC and AWSC intersections.
r AWSC: At all-way stop-controlled intersections, the level-of-service is determined by the weighted average delay for all vehicles entering the intersection. The methodologies for these types of intersections calculate a single weighted average delay and LOS for the intersection as a whole. The average delay criteria used to determine the LOS at all-way stop intersections is the same as that presented in Table 17. LOS for specific movements can also be determined based on the TWSC methodology.

It is not unusual for some of the minor street movements at unsignalized intersections to have LOS D, E, or F conditions while the major street movements have LOS A, B, or C conditions. ln such a case, the minor street traffic experiences delays that can be substantial for individual minor street vehicles, but the majority of vehicles using the intersection have very little delay. Usually in such cases, the minor street traffic volumes are relatively low. lf the minor street volume is large enough, improvements to reduce the minor street delay may be justified, such as channelization, widening, or signalization.

Table 17. Level of Service Criteria for lntersections
Source: Transportation Research Board (2016) Highway Capacity Manual 6*' Edition, Washington D.C.

Note 1: Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) LOS is calculated separately for each minor street movement (or shared movement) as well as major street left turns using these criteria. Any movement with a volume to capacity ratio (v/c) greater than 1.0 is considered to be LOS F.

Note 2: All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) assessment of LOS at the approach and intersection levels is based solely on control delay.

SlsnalWarrants
At each unsignalized intersection, the potential need for a traffic signal was evaluated. Traffic signal warrants are a series of standards that provide guidelines for determining if a traffic signal is appropriate. Signal warrant analyses are typically conducted at intersections of uncontrolled major streets and stop sign-controlled minor streets. lf one or more signal warrants are met, signalization of the intersection may be appropriate. However, a signal should not be installed if none of the warrants are met, since the installation of signals would increase delays on the previously uncontrolled major street and may increase the occurrence of particular types of accidents.

TWSCl
Average Delay by
Movement
(seconds/uehlclef
AWSg
lntersection Wide
Average Delay
(seconds/vehicle)
Level of
Service (lOSl Descrlptlon
A Little or no delay <10 <10
B Short traffic delay >10and<15 >10and<15
c Average traffic delays >15and<25 >15and<25
D [ong traffic delays >25and<35 >25and<35
E Very long traffic delays >35and<50 >35and<50
F > 50 (or, v/c > 1.0) >50
Extreme delays potentially affecting
other traffic movements in the
intersection
City of Folsom to7 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
As stated in the 2014 California Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD 20!413, "An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian charocteristics, ond physicol choracteristlcs of the locotion shall be performed to determine whether instollation of a traffic control signol is justilied at a porticulor locotion.

The investigation of the need for a traffic control signal shall include an analysis of factors reloted to the existing operation ond safety at the study locotion and the potential to improve these conditions, and the applicable factors contained in the following troffic signal warrants:
o Worrant 7, Eight-hour Vehicular Volume
t Worront 2, Four-hour Vehicular Volume
t Worront 3, Peok-hour
o Warront 4, Pedestrian Volume
t Wonont 5, School Crossing
o Warrant 5, Coordinated Signal System
o Warront 7, Crash Experience
t Worrant 8, Roodway Network
c Wdrront 9, lntersection Neor o Grode Crossing
The sotisfaction of a traffic signol warront or worrants sholl not in itself require the instollation of o traffic control signal."
Consistent with the industry standard of practice, the Traffic lmpact Analysis did not evaluate the full panoply of warrants for traffic signals, but instead focused on the peak-hour warrant. The MUTCD states that, "Ihrs [peak-hour] signal worront sholl be opplied only in unusuel cases, such os office complexes, monufocturing plonts, industriol complexes, or high-occuponcy vehicle facilities thot ottract or dischorge large numbers of vehicles over a short time." So, the peak-hour warrant is being used in this impact analysis study as an "indicato/' of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. lntersections that exceed the peak-hour warrant are considered (for the purposes of this impact analysis) to be likely to meet one or more of the other signal warrants (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). This peak-hour analysis is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction.

Unsignalized intersections were evaluated using the Peak-hour Volume Warrant (Warrant No. 3) in the California MUTCD 2014. The Peak-hour Volume Warrant was applied where the minor street experiences long delays in entering or crossing the major street for at least one hour in a day. Even if the Peak-hour Volume Warrant is met, a more detailed signal warrant study is recommended before a signal is installed. The more detailed study should consider volumes during the daily peak-hours of roadway traffic, pedestrian traffic, and accident histories.

Baslt Sesments
Basic freeway segments operations and level-of-service is defined by density (passenger cars per mile per lane) which depends upon traffic volumes, and segment, characteristics. These characteristics 3 Caltrans (20i9) California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition as amendcd for usc in Califomia - 2014 Edition - Revision 4, March 29,2019' Section 4C.

City of Folsom 108 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
include the geometry, grade, free flow speeds, and heavy vehicles. Table 18 shows the level of service criteria for basic freeway segments.

Table 18. Level of Service Criteria - Basic
Source: Transportation Research Board (2010) Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11, Washington, D.C.

Merce and Dlvene Seements
Freeway merge and diverge segments operations and level-of-service is defined by density (passenger cars per mile per lane) which depends upon traffic volumes and the ramp characteristics, These characteristics include the length and type of acceleration/deceleration lanes, free-flow speeds, number of lanes, grade, heavy vehicles, and types of facilities. Table 19 shows the relationship of level-of-service to freeway density for merge, diverge, and weaving segments.

Table 19. Level of Seruice Criteria - tr, urvEt Areas
Level of Servlce
Maxlmum Denslty
lpasscnEer vehlcles per mlle per lanel
A <10
B 20
c 28
D 35
E >35
F Demand exceeds capacity
Source: Transportation Research Board (2010) Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 13, Washington, D.C.

Slondords ol Slgnillconce
Consistency with General Plan LOS policies for the proposed project were determined based on the methods described above and identified as either "significant" or "less than significant". General Plan Policy M4.1.3 addresses LOS:

Strive to achieve at leost traffic LOS "D" (or better) for local streets and roodways throughout the City. ln designing tronsportotion improvements, the City will prioritize use of smort technologies ond innovotive solutions that maximize efficiencies and sofety while minimizing the physicolfootprint. During the course of Plan buildout, it may occur that temporally higher LOS result where roodwoy improvements have not been adequotely phosed os development proceeds. However, this situotion will be minimized based on onnuol troffic studies and monitoring progroms. City Stoff will report to the City Council ot regular intervols vio the Copitol Improvement Progrom process for the Council to prioritize projects integrol to achieving LOS D or better.

Consistent with historical practice within the City of Folsom, the General Plan EIR also includes a criterion addressing potential impacts at locations that operate at level-of-service E or F under level of Servlce
Maxlmum Denslty
lpassenner vehlcles per mlle per lanel
A <11
B 18
c 26
D 35
E 45
F > 45, or Demand exceeds capacitv
City of Folsom 109 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
no-project conditions. Under that standard, a significant impact would occur if the proposed project would:
lncreose the averoge deldy by five seconds or more ot an intersection thot currently operotes (or is projected to operote) ot on unocceptable level-of-service under "no' project" conditions.

For the purposes of the traffic analysis, an impact is considered potentially significant if implementation of the project would result in any of the following;
Cause an intersection in Folsom that currently operates (or is projected to operate) at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or worse.
lncrease the average delay by five seconds or more at an intersection in Folsom that currently operates (or is projected to operate) at an unacceptable LOS E or F' Freeway Facilities
An impact is considered significant on freeway facilities if the project causes the facility to change from an acceptable to unacceptable LOS. For facilities that are or will be operating at unacceptable LOS without the project, an impact is considered significant if:
o The existing LOS cannot be maintained with the addition of project traffic; o The project traffic increases vehicle density on a freeway mainline segment or freeway ramp junction by 0.1 passenger cars per lane per mile;
. The project increases the number of peak-hour vehicles on a freeway mainline segment or freeway ramp junction by more than 1 percent.
per the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic lmpact Studies, Caltrans strives to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D on state highway facilities. However, for the affected portion of US 50, Caltrans has established a concept LOS E thresholda. For consistency with other traffic impact studies performed in the City of Folsom that considered US Highway 50, LOS E was selected as the minimum standard for all study freeway facilities.

Bi cycl e/ Pe d estri a n/Tro nsit F oci I ities
An impact is Considered significant if implementation of the project wouldl r lnhibit the use of bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities. o Eliminate existing bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities. o Prevent the implementation of planned bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities.

Existing 2021 Conditions
Tables 20 and 21 present a summary of level-of-service results for the study intersections under Existing Conditions. The results indicate that all study segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS.

Three study intersections exceed the General Plan LOS standard prior to the addition of project traffic. a
a
City of Folsom 110 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate center Apartments ISMND
Prairie City Rd/American Aggregate Dr would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.

Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM and PM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.

East Bidwell St/lron Point Rd would operate at a deficient LOS during the PM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions,
These locations are shown in orange highlight in the tables below. Calculation sheets for intersection delay and LOS are provided in Appendix H.

Table 20. Exist 2021 lntersection and IOS
*Level of Service
**Two Way Stop Control: LOS is defined by delay for the worst movement/ shared movement, which is listed with the LOS results.

Table 21. 2021 US 50 and LOS
a
a
a
Control
Without Project AM
Delav lSec.l and LOS
Without Project PM
lntersection Delav lSec.l and IOS

1. Prairie City Rd/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 10.3 B 8.3 A

2. Pairie City Rd/ US 50 westbound ramps Signal 19.4 B 8.9 A

3. Prairie City Rd/ American Aggregates Rd Sienal 55.1 E 28.8 C

4. Praire City Rd/ lron Point Rd Sienal 88.7 F 64.5 E

5. lron Point Road/ Grover rd Signal 50.9 D 42.3 D

6. lron Point Road/ Oak Avenue Parkway Signal 36.2 D 37.8 D

7. lron Point Road/ West Kaiser access road TWSCT* 11.9 B Northbound 12.9 B Northbound

8. lron Point Road/ Rowberry Way Signal 14.3 B 74.2 B

9. lron Point Rd/ Safe Credit Union access TWSCr'* 15.6 C WB left/U 23.1 C WB left/U

10. lron Point Rdl Broadstone Pkwy Signal 15.5 B 19,6 B

11. lron Point Rd/ East Bidwell 5t Sisnal 45.5 D 94.3 F

12. East Bidwell St/ US 50 westbound ramps AWSC 29.5 C 35.1 D

13. East Bidwell St/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 10.2 B 27.5 C

14. APN O72-3L20-O23 "Lot 5" access TWSC** 9.1A Northbound 8.8 A Northbound

15. APN O72-312O-O23 "Lot 1" access TWSC** 9.6 A Southbound 9.3 A Southbound US Highway 50 Segment Segment Type Without
Project AM
(Density
LOSr,)
Without
Project PM
(Density
LOS*)
US 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 24_5 C 17.3 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 22.9 C 17.L B US 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 24.3 C 19.0 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell to oak Ave Basic 24.8C 18.8 C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramp Diverge Not applicable to this US 50 westbound Oak Avenue lop onramp Merge scenario.

City of Folsom TlI March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apa rtments ISMND
SePment
Setment
TYDe
2021 AM
No ProJect
Denslty
and LOS
2021 PM No
Project
Density and
tos
2021 AM
Plus Proiect
Density and
tos
2021 PM
Plus Project
Density and
tos
US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over
onramp to Oak Ave offramp
Weave
Not applicable to this scenario
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue loop onramp Merge
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diagonal
onramp
Merge
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue to East
Bidwell
Basic

17.5 B 23.5 C 17.5 B 23.5 C
US 50 eastbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 10.4 B 16.5 B 10.4 B 16.5 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 9.3 A 13.9 B 9.3 A 13.9 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 7.5 A 13.1 B 7.6 A 13.1 B Existing Plus Approved Project (EPAPI 2026 Conditions
EPAP Conditions analysis utilizes lane configurations and signal timinB plans from the Existing Conditions. Tables 25 and 26 present a summary of LOS results for the study intersections under EPAP 2026 Conditions.

The results indicate that all study segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS; three study intersections exceed the General Plan LOS standard prior to the addition of project traffic.

Prairie City Rd/American Aggregate Dr would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.

Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM and PM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.

East Bidwell St/lron Point Rd would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM and PM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.

These locations are shown in orange highlight in the tables below. Calculation sheets for intersection delay and LOS are provided in Appendix H.

Table 25. EPAP 2025 lntersection and LOS
o
a
a
Wlthout Projecr PM
Control Delav lSec-) and LOS
Without Project AM
lntersection Delav lSec.l and IOS

1. Prairie City Rd/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 15.2 B 10.5 B

2. Pairie City Rd/ US 50 westbound ramps Signal 60.5 E 10.2 B

3. Prairie City Rd/ American Aggregates Rd Sisnal 110.5 F 30.8 C

4. Praire City Rd/ lron Point Rd Signal L2?.4F 72.4E

5. lron Point Road/ Grover rd Sienal 52D 43.4 D

6. lron Point Road/ Oak Avenue Parkway Signal 35.8 D 40.4 D

7. lron Point Road/ West Kaiser access road TWSC'* 12.4 B Northbound 13.7 B Northbound

8. lron Point Road/ Rowberry Way Signal 14.4 B 14.3 B

9. lron Point Rd/ Safe Credit Union access TWSC** 16.9 C WB left/U 27 D WB Left/ U City of Folsom LL4 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate C€nter Apartments ISMND
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp to
Prairie Citv Rd offramp
Weave
US 50 westbound Prairie Citv offramp Diverge 32.0 D 26.tC US 50 westbound Prairie Citv loop onramp Merge 24.1C 21.6 C US 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 24.5C 2L.5 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 28.6 D 31.0 D US 50 eastbound Prairie Citv diagonal onramp Merse 18.5 B 23.2C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp Merge L9.6 B 2s.4 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp to Oak
Ave offramp
Weave Not applicable to this
scenario,
US 50 eastbound Oak rAvenue loop onramp Merge
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp Merge
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue to East Bidwell Basic 17.5 B 23.5 C US 50 eastbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 10.4 B 16.5 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 9.3 A 13.9 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 7.5 A 13.18 *Level of Service
Trip Generation
Traffic generated by the proposed project was based on lnstitute of Transportation Engineers (lTE) Trip Generation Manual, 10*' Edition (2OL7l, and is provided in Table 22 below.

Table 22. Generation
Source: ITE (2017) Trip Generation Manual, 10tr' Ed, lnstitute of Transportation Engineers, Washington DC.

Existing 2021 with Proiect Conditions
Peak-hour traffic associated with the Project was added to the Existing2O2I turning volumes at each intersection. Delay and level-of-service were determined at the study intersections and segments.

Tables 23 and 24 presents a summary of the level-of-service results for the study intersections and segments.

PM
{outl
Location Quantity Units Metrlc Daily Am
lTotl
Am
(lnl
Am
(outl
Pm
(Totl
PM
llnl
du Rate 5.44 0.32 27% 73o/o o.47 5Oo/o 40%
Trips 544 32 9 23 4t 25 15
lot 6 100
Lot 1 153 Du Rate s.44 o.32 27% 73% o.4L 60% 40%
Trips 832 49 13 35 53 38 25
Rate 5.44 0.32 27% 73% o.4! 60% 40%
22 59 to4 52 42
Total 2s3 Du
Trips t376 81
City of Folsom t12 March2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apa rtments ISMND
Table 23. Existing 2021 lntersection Delay and LOS, with and without Proiect Table 24. 2021 US 50 and with and without
lntersection Control
2021 No
Prolect AM
Delay (Sec.f
and LOS
2021 No
Project PM
Delay (Sec.|
and LOS
2021 Plus
ProJect AM
Delay (Sec.)
and IOS
2021 Plus
Prolect PM
Delay (Sec.|
and LOS
1, Prairie Citv Rd/US 50 eastbound ramps Sicnal 10.3 B 8.3 A 10.4 B 8.4 A

2. Prairie City Rd/US 50 westbound ramps Sicnal 19.4 B 8.9 A 19.5 B 8.9 A

3. Prairie City Rd/American Aggregates Rd Signal 66.1 E 28.8 C 56,3 E 28.9 C

4. Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd Signal 88.7 F 64.5 E 90.6 F 66.1 E

5. lron Pt Road/Grover Rd Signal 50.9 D 42.3D 51.4 D 42.5 D 6, lron Point Rd /Oak Avenue Pkwy Signal 36.2 D 37.8 D 36.4 D 38.4 D

7. lron Point Rd /West Kaiser access road TWSC** 11.9 B Northbound

12.9 B
Northbound
11,9 B
Northbound
138
Northbound

8. lron Point Rd /Rowberry Way Signal 14.3 B 74.28 14.8 B 14.5 B

9. lron Point Rd /Safe Credit Union access TWSC** 15.6 C WB left/U

23.1 C WB
left/U
16CWB
left/ U

23.6 C WB
left/ U

10. lron Point Rd /Broadstone PkwY Signal 15.6 B 19.6 B 15.7 B 19.7 B

11. lron Point Rd /East Bidwell 5t Signal 45.5 D 94.3 F 46D 95.3 F L2. East Bidwell SI/US 50 westbound
ramps
Signal 29.5 c 35.1 D 29.6 C 35.7 D
13- East Bidwell St/Us 50 eastbound ramps Signal 10.2 B 2L.5 C 10.2 B 2L.7 C

14. APN O72-3L2O-O23 "Lot 5" access TWSC** 9.1A
Northbound

8.8 A
Northbound

9.2 A
Northbound

8.9 A
Northbound

15. APN 072-3120-023 "Lot l" access TWSC** 9.6 A
Southbound

9.3 A
Southbound

10.3 B
Southbound

10.2 B
Southbound
Segment
SeEment
Type
2021 AM
No Prolect
Density
and IOS
2021 PM No
Prolect
Denslty and
tos
2021 AM
Plus Project
Denslty and
ros
2021 PM
Plus Project
Denslty and
ros
US 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 24,5 C t7.38 24.s C !.4A US 50 westbound East Bidwell loop
onramp
Merge

22.9 C L7,TB 22.9 C \7.18
US 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 24.3 C 19.0 B 24.3C 19.0 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell to Oak Ave Basic 24.8C 18.8 C 24.8 C 18.8 C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramP Diverge
Not Applicable to this scenario
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue lop onramp Merge
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal
onramp to Prairie City Rd offramP
Weave
US 50 westbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 32.0 D 26.IC 32.0 D 26.1C US 50 westbound Prairie City loop onramp Merge 24.1C 21.6C 24.L C 2r.6C US 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal
onramp
Merge

24.5 C 2t.5 C 24.6C 22.1C
US 50 eastbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 28,5 D 31.0 D 28.6 D 31.1 D US 50 eastbound Prairie City diagonal
onramp
Merge

18.5 B 23.2C 18.6 B 23.2C
US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over
onramp
Merge

19.6 B 25.4C 19.5 B 25.4C
City of Folsom 113 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
lntersectlon Control
Without Project AM
Delav lSec.l and [oS
Without Project PM
Delay (Sec.l and LoS

10. lron Point Rd/ Broadstone Pkwy Signal 15.3 B 20.5 C

11. lron Point Rd/ East Bidwell St Sign a I 67,LE 143.4 F

12. East Bidwell St/ US 50 westbound ramps Signa I 45.9 D 53.5 D

13. East Bidwell St/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 12.9 B 25.4 C

14. APN 072-3120-023 "Lot 6" access TWSC{"x 9.1 A Nofthbound 8.8 A Northbound

15. APN 072-3t20-023 "1ot 1" access TWSC** 9.6 A Southbound 9.8 A Southbound **Two Way Stop Control: LOS is defined by delay for the worst movement/ shared movement, which is listed with the LOS results.

Table 26. EPAP 2026 US 50 and LOS
EPAP 2025 with Project Condition
The results indicate that all study segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS; three study intersections exceed the General Plan LOS standard prior to the addition of project traffic.

Prairie City Rd/American Aggregate Dr would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.
a
Without
Project AM
(Density
LOS'I)
without
Project PM
(Density
LOS*)
US Highway 50 Segment Segment Type
US 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 25.9 C 17.8 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell loop onramp MerAe 24.4C 18.18 US 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 25.9 C 27.2C US 50 westbound East Bidwell to Oak Ave Basic 26.9D 2L.2C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramp Diverge
US 50 westbound oak Avenue lop onramp Merge
Not applicable to this
scenario.

US 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp to
Prairie Citv Rd offramp
Weave
US 50 westbound Prairie Citv offramp Diverge 33.7 D 28.7 D US 50 westbound Prairie City loop onramp Merge 25.5 C 23,4 C US 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 26.0C 23.2C US 50 eastbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 30.5 D 33.3 D US 50 eastbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 19.6 B 24.1C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp Merge 21.LC 26.3 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp to Oak Weave Ave offramp
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue loop onramp Merge
Merge
Not applicable to this
scenario.

US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue to East Bidwell Basic 18.8 C 24.7 C US 50 eastbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 11.8 B 77.6 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 9.3 A 13.9 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 8.5 A 74.28 City of Folsom 115 March 2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM and PM peak if not for the Covid-l9 related traffic reductions.

East Bidwell St/lron Point Rd would operate at a deficient LOS during the AM and PM peak if not for the Covid-19 related traffic reductions.

These locations are shown in orange highlight in the tables below. Because the increase in delay is less than five seconds, these exceedance of the General Plan level-of-service policy is not considered a project impact. Calculation sheets for intersection delay and LOS are provided in Appendix H.

Table 17. EPAP 2026 lntersection Delay and LOS, with and without Project *t Two Way Stop Control: LOS is defined by delay for the worst m ovement/shared movement, which is listed with the LOS results.

Table 28. EPAP 2026 US 50 ent Den$lty and with and without Not Applicable to this scenario
I
e
lntersectlon Control
2021 No
Prolect AM
Delay (Sec.)
and LOS
2021 No
ProJect PM
Delay (Sec.l
and IOS
2021 Plus
ProJect AM
Delay (Sec.)
and LOS
2021 Plus
Proiect PM
Delay (5ec.f
and IOS

1. Prairie Citv Rd/US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 15.2 B 10.5 B 15.3 B 10.5 B

2. Prairie City Rd/US 50 westbound ramps Signal 60.5 E 10.2 B 60.8 E 10.3 B

3. Prairie City Rd/American Aggregates Rd Signal 110.s F 30,8 C 110.6 F 30.8 C

4. Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd Signal t2?.4F 72.4E L25.2F 74.tE

5. lron Pt Road/Grover Rd Signal 52D 43.4D 52.5 D 43.7 D

6. lron Point Rd /Oak Avenue PkwY Sienal 36.8 D 40.4 D 37.LD 41.4 D

7. lron Point Rd /West Kaiser access road TWSC** T2.4 B Northbound

13.7 B
Northbound
T2.48
Northbound

13.8 B
Northbound

8. lron Point Rd /Rowberry Way Signal 14.4 B 14.3 B 15.0 B 14.6 B

9. lron Point Rd /Safe Credit Union access TWSC*f

16.9 C WB
left/ U

27.0 D WB
Left/ U

17.3 C WB
left/U

27.7 D WB
left/U

10. lron Point Rd /Broadstone PkwY Signal 16.3 B 20.5 C 16-4 B 20.6 C

11. lron Point Rd /East Bidwell St Signal 67.tE 143.4 F 68E 144.5F

12. East Bidwell SI/US 50 westbound ramps Sienal 46.9 D 53.5 D 47D 53.8 D

13. East Bidwell SI/US 50 eastbound ramps Sicn a I 12.9 B 25.4C L2.98 25.5 C

14. APN 072-3t20-O23 "Lot 6" access TWSC'} ',l
9-1 A
Northbound

8.8 A
Northbound

9.2 A
Northbound

8.9 A
Northbound

15. APN 072-3120-023 "Lot 1" access TWSC*r 9.6 A
Northbound

9.8 A
Southbound

10.3 B
Southbound

10.2 B
Southbound
2021 PM
No Proiect
Denslty
and lOS
2021 AM
Plus ProJect
Denslty and
LOS
2021 PM
Plus Project
Density and " tos
Segment
Type
2021 AM No
Project
Denslty and
SePment tos
US 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 25.9 C 17.8 B 26C 17.9 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 24.4C 18.1 B 24.4 C 18.1 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 25.9 C zt.zc 25.9 C 27.2C US 50 westbound East Bidwell to Oak Ave Basic 26.9 D 2r.2C 26.9 D 2t.2C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramP Diverge
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue lop onramp Merge
City of Folsom 116 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMN D
Sesment
Segment
Tvoe
2021 AM No
Proiect
Denslty and
tos
2021 PM
No Project
Densfty
and IOS
2021 AM
Plus Proiect
Density and
tos
2021 PM
Plus Profect
Density and
tos
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp
to Prairie City Rd offramp
Weave
US 50 westbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 33.7 D 28.7 D 33.7 D 28.7 D US 50 westbound Prairie CitV loop onramp Merge 25.5 C 23.4C 2s.5 C 23.4 C US 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 26.0 C 23.2C 26.1C 23.3 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 30.5 D 33.3 D 30.5 D 33.3 D US 50 eastbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 19.5 B 24.tC 19.6 B 24.7C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp Merge zt.LC 26.3 C 2t.7 C 25.3 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp to
Oak Ave offramp
Weave
Not applicable to this scenario.

US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue loop onramp Merge
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp Merge
US 50 eastbound oak Avenue to East Bidwell Basic 18,8 C 24.7 C 18.8 C 24.7 C US 50 eastbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 11.8 B 17.5 B 11.8 B 77.68 US 50 eastbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 9.3 A 13.9 B 9.4 A 14.0 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 8.5 A 14.28 8.5 A 14.3 B Cumulative 2026 Conditions with or without Proiect
The Cumulative Conditions analysis accounts for several planned changes to Folsom's transportation system:
o Addition of a third northbound through lane at intersection #4 (Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd; r Widening of lron Point Rd to six lanes on all segments between Prairie City Rd and East Bidwell St (effecting intersections 5-9);
r Construction of the Rowberry Way overcrossing of US Highway 50; . Construction of the Empire Ranch Rd interchange;
r Construction of the Oak Avenue Pkwy interchange; and, e The extension of Alder Creek Pkwy through Oak Avenue Pkwy (along with other Folsom Ranch infra structu re).

Tables 29 and 3O present a summary of LOS results for the study intersections under EPAP 2026 Conditions. All study intersections and segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS.

Calculation sheets for intersection delay and LOS are provided in Appendix H.

City of Folsom tt7 March2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Center nts ISMND
Table 29. Cumulative 2035 Intersection and LOS
**Two Way Stop Control: LOS is defined by delay for the worst movement/ shared movement, which is listed with the LOS results.

Table 30. Cumulative 2035 US 50 and IOS
lntersection Control
Wathout Project AM
Delay (Sec.) and LOS
Without Project PM
Delay (Sec.l and [oS

1. Prairie City Rd/ US 50 eastbound ramps Sisnal 10.5 B 9.5 A

2. Pairie City Rd/ US 50 westbound ramps Signal L7,2 B 9.4 A

3. Prairie City Rd/ American Aggregates Rd Signal 53.3 D 29.5 C

4. Praire Citv Rd/ lron Point Rd Signal 45.5 D 38D

5. lron Point Roadl Grover rd Signal 48.5 D 38.9 D

5. lron Point Road/ Oak Avenue Parkway Signal 39.7 D 52.3 D

7. lron Point Road/ West Kaiser access road TWSC** 18,3 C Northbound 21,5 C Northbound

8. lron Point Road/ Rowberry Way Signal 24.3 C 32.7 C

9. lron Point Rd/ Safe Credit Union access TWSC** 23.6 C WB left/U 29,5 C WB left/ U

10. lron Point Rd/ Broadstone PkwV Signal 188 24.3 C

11. lron Point Rd/ East Bidwell 5t Signal 37.4 D s4.5 D

12. East Bidwell st/ Us 50 westbound ramps Signal 18.7 B 2r.2C

13. East Bidwell St/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 10.9 B 11.8 B

14. APN 072-3t20-023 "1ot 6" access TWSCai 9.1A Northbound 8.8 A Northbound

15. APN 072-3120-023 "Lot 1" access TWSC** 9.7 A Southbound 9.3 A Southbound

16. oak Pkwy/ US 50 westbound ramps Signal 13.7 B 22.7 C

17. Oak Pkwy/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 9.5 A 20.4 C Segment Type without
Project AM
(Density
LOS*)
Without
Project PM
(Density
LOS*)
US Highway 50 Segment
US 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge L7.3 8 L .t S US 50 westbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 31.2 D 24C US 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 28.5 D 22.4C US 50 westbound East Bidwell to Oak Ave Basic 30.6 D 22.2C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramp Diverge 33.7 D 27C
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue lop onramp Merge 28D 24.7 C
US 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp to Weave 27.6C Prairie Citv Rd offramp

25.2 C
US 50 westbound Prairie Citv offramp Diverge NA NA
US 50 westbound Prairie City loop onramp Merge 33.2 D 31.6 D US 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 29.3 D 27.9 C US 50 eastbound Prairie Citv offramp Diverge 3s.8 E 37.5 E US 50 eastbound Prairie Citv diagonal onramp Merge 27.7C 31D US 50 eastbound Prairie Citv fly-over onramp Merge NA NA US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp to Oak 225 C 26C Ave offramp
Weave
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue loop onramp Merge 24.rC 28.2D US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diasonal onramp Merge 26.7 C 32.5 D U5 50 eastbound Oak Avenue to East Bidwell Basic 22.L C 30.1D City of Folsom 118 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
US 50 eastbound East Bidwell offra Diverge 15.2 B 27.7 C US 50 eastbound East Bidwell loo onram Merge 118 15.8 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 11.7 B 19.2 B Cumulative 2035 with Project Conditions
Peak-hour traffic associated with the project was added to anticipated EPAP 2025 turning volumes at each intersection. Delay and LOS were then determined at the study intersections, Tables 31 and 32 present a summary of the LOS results for the study intersections. All study intersections and segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS. Calculation sheets for intersection delay and LOS are provided in Appendix H.

Table 31. Cumulative 2035lntersection Del and IOS with and without ** Two Way Stop Control: LOS is defined by delay for the worst move ment/shared movement, which is listed with the LOS results.

Table 32. Cumulative US 50 and LOS with and without
No Proiect
PM Delay
(Sec.l and
tos
Plus Project
AM Delay
(Sec.l and
tos
Plus Proiect
PM Delay
(Sec.) and
Control tos
No Project
AM Delay
lSec.) and
lntersection tos

1. Prairie Citv Rd/US 50 eastbound ramps Sisnal 10.6 B 9.5 A 10.6 B 9.5 A

2. Prairie City Rd/US 50 westbound ramps Sienal T7.28 8.4 A L7.28 8.4 A

3. Prairie City Rd/American Aggregates Rd Signal 53.3 D 29.5 C 53.3 D 29.5 C

4. Prairie Citv Rd/lron Point Rd Signal 45.5 D 38D 45.7 D 38.1 D

5. lron Pt Road/Grover Rd Signal 48.5 D 38.9 D 48.7 D 39.1 D

6. lron Point Rd Signal 39.7 D 52,3 D 40.8 D 54.5 D /oak Avenue Pkwy 2L.7 C
Northbound TWSC**

18.3 C
Northbound

21.5 C
Northbound

18.4 C

7. Northbound lron Point Rd /West Kaiser access road

8. lron Point Rd /Rowberry Way Signal 24.3 C 32.7 C 25C 34C

29.5 D WB
left/U

23.9 C WB
left/ U

30.8 D WB
teft/U TWSC** 23.6 C WB
left/U 9. lron Point Rd /Safe Credit Union access

10. lron Point Rd Signal 18B 243C 188 24.4C /Broadstone PkwY

11. Signal 37.4D 54.s C 37.5 D s4.6 D lron Point Rd /East Bidwell St

12. East Bidwell SI/US 50 westbound ramps Signal 18.7 B 21.2C 18.7 B 2t.2C

13. East Bidwell St/US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 10.9 B 11.8 B 10.9 B 11.8 B

8.8 A
Northbound

9.3 A
Northbound
9a
Northbound TWSC**

9.1A
Northbound 14. APN O72-3t2O-023 "Lot 5" access

9.3 A
Southbound

10.4 B
Southbound

10.3 B
Southbound TWSC*r

9.7 A
Southbound 15. APN 072-3720-023 "Lot l" access

22.7 C t4.48 23.4C Signal 13.7 B

15. Oak Avenue Pkwy/ US 50 westbound
ramps
Oak Avenue Pkwy/ US 50 eastbound ramps Signal 9.5 A 20.4C 9.5 A 20.9 C Selment
Segment
Type
AM No
Profect
Denslty and
ros
PM No
Prolect
Denslty
and LOS
AM Plus
Prolect
Denslty and
ros
PM Plus
Prolect
Denslty and
tos
US 50 westbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 17.3 B 14.1 B 17.3 B 14.1 B US 50 westbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 31.2 D 24C 31.2 D 24.0 C City of Folsom 1L9 March2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Seament
SeBment
Tvoe
AM No
Project
Denslty and
t-os
PM No
Project
Denslty
and LOS
AM Plus
Project
Denslty and
ros
PM Plus
Prolect
Denslty and
tos
US 50 westbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge 28.6 D 22.4 C 28.6 D 22.5C US 50 westbound East Bidwell to Oak Ave Basic 30.5 D 22.2 C 30.6 D 22.3 C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue offramp Diverge 33.7 D 27C 33.7 D 27.rC US 50 westbound Oak Avenue lop onramp Merge 28D 24.t C 28.0 D 24.7 C US 50 westbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp
to Prairie City Rd offramp
Weave

27.6 C 25.2C 27.7 C 25.3 C
US 50 westbound Prairie City offramp Diverge NA
US 50 westbound Prairie City loop onramp Merge 33.2 D 31.6 D 33.3 D 31.7 D US 50 westbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 29.3 D 27.9 C 29.4 D 27.9 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City offramp Diverge 35.8 E 37.5 E 35.8 E 27.7 E US 50 eastbound Prairie City diagonal onramp Merge 27.L C 31.0 D 27.2 C 31.1 C US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp Merge NA
US 50 eastbound Prairie City fly-over onramp to
Oak Ave offramp
Weave

22.5 C 26.0 C 22.7 C 25.1C
US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue loop onramp Merge 24.1C 28.2D 24.LC 28.2D US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue diagonal onramp Merge 26.7 C 32.5 D 25.8 C 32.5 D US 50 eastbound Oak Avenue to East Bidwell Basic 22.r C 30.1 D 22.2C 30.2 D US 50 eastbound East Bidwell offramp Diverge 15.2 B 21.7 C 15.3 B 2r.7 C US 50 eastbound East Bidwell loop onramp Merge 118 16.8 B 11.1 B 16.9 B US 50 eastbound East Bidwell slip onramp Merge !1.7 s 19.2 B tt.7 B 19.2 I Evoluolion ol Tronsporlolion ond Troffic
Questions a, f: Less than Significant lmpact with Mitigation. Under existing 2021 conditions with the project, the westbound left-turn queue during the AM peak hour exceeds available storage, and the project is anticipated to add 1 vehicle to the queue. Additional queued vehicles can contribute to LOS impacts when queues are longer than available storage and f'spill-back" can affect the capacity of adjacent lanes. ln order to avoid impacts to the westbound left'turn queue during the AM peak, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 shall be implemented. Additionally, under the EPAP 2025 conditions with the project, the westbound left-turn queue during the AM peak hour exceeds the available storage, and the project is anticipated to add 1 vehicle to the queue, contributing to potential LOS impacts. Similar to the existing 2021 conditions, in order to avoid impacts to the westbound left-turn queue, Mitigation Measure TRA-2 shall be implemented. With implementation of Mitigation Measures TRA-1 and TRA-2, the project would have a less than significant effect on traffic operations under 2021 conditions and under 2025 conditions with the addition of project traffic.

Mitigation Measure TRA-I: Pralrle Road/ lron Point Road Under Existing 2021 Conditions.

The appticant shall modify Prairie City Road/ lron Point Road signal timing plan by shifting l second from the eastbound through movement to the westbound left turn movement, reduce the vehicle extension setting from adding five to six additional seconds to the green phase for through movements to adding four seconds to the green phase for through movements for each vehicle passing the detector after the minimum green phase length has been exceeded. This mitigation measure shall be implemented by the City of Folsom 720 March 2A22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
City through the reimbursement agreement with the applicant to cover any City costs. The implementation of this mitigation measure shall occur prior to issuance of the first building permit.

Mitigation Measure TRA-2: Prairie Road/ lron Point Road under EPAP 2026 Conditions.

The applicant shall modify Prairie City Rd/lron Point Rd signaltiming plan by shifting 1 second from the eastbound through movement to the westbound left turn movement, reduce the vehicle extension setting from adding five to six additional seconds to the green phase for through movements to adding four seconds to the green phase for through movements for each vehicle passing the detector after the minimum green phase length has been exceeded. This mitigation measure shall be implemented by the City through the reimbursement agreement with the applicant to cover any City costs. The implementation of this mitigation measure shall occur prior to issuance of the first building permit. euestion b: Less than Significant lmpact. The Governors' Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has published guidance recommending a CEQA threshold for transportation impacts of land use projects of a 15% Vehicles Miles Travelled (VMT) reduction per capita, relative to either city or regional averages, based on the California's Climate Scoping Plan. Qualitative assessment of VMT reduction is acceptable to screen projects.

Under State Law (5B 743), VMT became the only CEQA threshold of significance for transportation impacts on July 1,2O2O. Without specific General Plan guidance for VMT thresholds, this analysis uses qualitative screening against OPR's guidance of a 15 percent per capita VMT reduction. To support jurisdictions' SB743 implementation, SACOG developed thresholds and screening maps for residential projects, using outputs from the 2016 base year travel demand model run for the 2020 MTP/scs.

SACOG's travel demand model is activity/tour based and is designed to estimate an individual's daily travel, accounting for land use, transportation and demographics that influence peoples'travel behaviors. For residential projects, the threshold is defined as total household VMT per capita achieving 15% of reduction compared to regional (or any appropriate sub-area) average VMT. The map uses HEX geography. Residential VMT per capita per HEX is calculated by tallying all household VMTs, including VMT traveling outside the region, generated by the residents living at the HEX and divided by the total population in the HEX, Green hexagons denote areas where residential VMT is 50 to 85 percent of the regional average and yellow hexagons denote areas where residential VMT is 85 to 100 percent of the regional average.

The project is located within one of the green hexagons with average residential VMT of l7-miles per capita (per day). The project is anticipated to generate less than 82 percent ofthe regional per capita residential daily VMT of 20.82 miles. The project is therefore anticipated to have a less than significant impact on VMT.
euestion c: No lmpact. No private or public airports are located within the City of Folsom. The nearest public airfield is Cameron Airpark, located approximately 8.5-miles from the proposed project. The Mather Airport is located approximately 10-miles southwest of the project site. The proposed project would not result in modification to any air travel route. There would be no impact and no mitigation would be required.
euestion d: Less than Significant lmpact, The project would be accessed via proposed private roadways inside of the Folsom Corporate Center. Access to City streets is not being modified and Folsom's requirements for right turn tapers and deceleration lanes are not applicable. Additionally, vehicle speeds and volumes within the business park's internal roadway do not create a safety issue that would City of Folsom 72t March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
necessitate right turn tapers and deceleration lanes. Project access is from private roadways within the Folsom Corporate Center and the City's minimum required throat depth is not applicable.

Potential geometric constraints and safety issues were evaluated in the traffic study and addressed as described above. No issues were identified that suggest atypical or unsafe frontage conditions that require additional analysis. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact.

Question e: Less than Significant lmpact. Consistent with the City of Folsom's Multi-Hazard Emergency Management Plan, the City maintains pre-designated emergency evacuation routes along major streets and thoroughfares. No aspect of the proposed project would modifo these streets or preclude their continued use as an emergency evacuation route. The Project's internal drive isles have 25-foot inner/50-foot outer minimum turning radii to accommodate fire department access. ln addition to the primary access to each project parcel, separate emergency vehicle access points are also provided. Lot 5 has one emergency vehicle access point located 170-feet east of the main access driveway along a private road. Lot t has two emergency vehicle access points located approximately 540-feet east and west of the main access driveway along a private road. The plans would be approved by the City Fire Department prior to project implementation; therefore, a less than significant impact to fire protection would occur and no mitigation would be necessary.

City of Folsom r22 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XVII. TRIBAI CULTURAI RESOURCES
TRIBAI. CUITUMI RESOURCES:

Would the projectr
Potcntlal
lmpact
Less Than
Etnlflcant
wlth
MltlSatlon
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
lmpact lmpact
l[o
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 2tO74 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope ofthe landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
n
ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5O24.I.ln applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the significance of the resource
to a California Native American tribe.

I n tr
Environmentol Selllng
As amended in 2OL4, Assembly Bill (AB 52), requires that the City of Folsom (City) provide notice to any California Native American tribes that have requested notice of projects subject to CEQA review and consult with tribes that responded to the notice within 30 days of receipt with a request for consultation. Section 21073 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) defines California Native American tribes as "a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC for the purposes of Chapter 905 of the Statutes of 2OO4." This includes both federally and nonfederally recognized tribes. For the City of Folsom, these include the following tribes that previously submitted general request letters, requesting such noticing:
r Wilton Rancheria (letter dated January 13,2O2Ol
o lone Band of Miwok lndians (letter dated March 2, 2016) o United Auburn lndian Community (UAIC)of the Auburn Rancheria (letter dated November 23, 205 and updated per UAIC via email on Septembe r 29,2027l.

The purpose of consultation is to identify Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) that may be significantly impacted by the proposed Project, and to allow the City to avoid or mitigate significant impacts prior to Project approval and implementation. Section 2LO74(al of the PRC defines TCRs for the purpose of CEQA as: Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes (geographically defined in terms of the size and scope), City of Folsom t23 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following:
a) lncluded or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; andlor
b) lncluded in a loca I register of h istorica I resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1; and/or
c) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1.1n applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5O24.t for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Because criteria A and B also meet the definition of a Historical Resource under CEQA, a TCR may also require additional consideration as a Historical Resource, TCRs may or may not exhibit archaeological, cultural, or physical indicators and can only be identified by a culturally affiliated tribe, which has been determined under State law to be the subject matter expert for TCRs (ECORP 2022).

Clty Consullollon
Assembly Bill52
On September 21,2O21, the City of Folsom sent project notification letters to the three California Native American tribes named on the City's AB 52 contact list. The letters provided each tribe with a brief description of the Project and its location, contact information for the City's authorized representative, and a notification that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation. The 30-day response window closed on October 2L,2022.

The only tribe to respond was the UAIC. On September 29,202L, the City received an email from Anna Cheng that acknowledged receipt of the City's notification letter and informed the City that the UAIC has a new point of all CEQA-related letters and documents, Anna Starkey. On September 30,2O2L, the City received an email from Anna Starkey requesting consultation. The response indicated that there is a known TCR located west of the proposed Project boundary and requested access for a survey of the Project Area to ensure that the proposed Project does not extend into the TCR location.

On October 7,2O2L, the City formally initiated consultation with UAIC and acknowledged the tribe's statement about a known TCR located in the vicinity. ln the correspondence to the tribe, the City noted that a survey of the Project Area had been conducted recently and that a copy ofthe report would be provided to the tribe in advance of a meeting or further site visits.

On November 4,2O21, Anna Starkey responded to the City's separate SB 18 outreach (Section 2.2l.and referenced AB 52 in her reply. (From this point forward, all correspondence between the City and UAIC was simultaneously under both AB 52 an SB 18.)She noted the culturalsensitivity of the property and requested a copy ofthe cultural resources survey report that was being prepared and indicated the tribe's desire to defer to the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok lndians, if they were consulting on the Project. The City responded on November t6,2}2lto confirm the plan to forward a copy of the cultural City of Folsom 124 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
resources survey report when it was completed and that Shingle Springs had already been provided the opportunity to consult.

Accordingly, on December \3,2O2L, the City provided a copy of the cultural resources sut'vey report (HELIX 2021) to UAIC for their review. Anna Starkey acknowledged receipt of the report the same day and stated that "for archaeological tribal cultural resources, UAIC believes that our standard unanticipated discoveries mitigation measure should suffice for this project." ln her response, she also inquired about the number of oak trees that are proposed for removal and how they will be mitigated for. She questioned if any heritage trees had been identified and whether an arborist report had been prepared. The City replied with a copy of the arborist report, and upon her review, she indicated that heritage trees (in general) are a significant TCR and should be protected and offered to provide language for use in the CEQA document. The City responded that staff are still awaiting information on the plans for the heritage tree, and that this information would be provided upon receipt.

On December 77,2O2t, the City contacted UAIC to indicate that although there are many nonnative oaks on the property, there is a single heritage tree in the Project Area that will be preserved in place as part of the Project's design, which is consistent with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The City provided a link to the ordinance and stated that it welcomed the submission of suggested CEQA language for staff consideration.

On January 3,2022, UAIC provided a document to the City that expresses the UAIC's belief that native heritage trees, in general, have significance to the Miwok and Maidu (Nisenan) people, and that conservation of heritage trees is important. The UAIC provided the language with the intent for it to be incorporated into the CEQA document, and therefore, would not be considered confidential information. A copy of the UAIC submittal is included in Appendix l. senate Bill 18
On behalf of the City, ECORP contacted the California NAHC on September 7,202I, to request a list of tribal contacts under SB 18. The NAHC responded with the list on October 20,2A27. This list is usually different than the AB 52 list because it pulls from a different database at NAHC. Using the list provided, the City mailed project notices to the following tribes on October 25 and afforded them 90 days to respond to request consultation under SB 18 (ECORP 2022l,.

The 90-day response window closed on January 24,2422.
r Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk lndians
o Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk lndians
r Colfax-Todds Valley consolidated Tribe
r Guidiville lndian Rancheria
r lone Band of Miwok lndians
r Muwekma Ohlone lndian Tribe of the San Francisco Bay area c Nashville Enterprise Miwok-Maidu-Nishinam Tribe
r North Valley Yokuts Tribe
o Shingle Springs Band of Miwok lndians
City of Folsom t2s March2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
o The Confederated Villages of Lisjan
r TsiAkim Maidu
o Tule River lndian Tribe
o United Auburn lndian Community
o Wilton Rancheria
r Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation
On November 4,2O2L, Anna Starkey from UAIC responded to the notice. (From this point forward, all correspondence between UAIC and the City was carried out simultaneously relative to both AB 52 and sB 18.)
Among the remaining tribes noticed under SB 18, only one other tribe responded, On November 12, 2021, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation responded by email with a letter dated November 10, 2021, that stated that the Project is not within the aboriginal territories of the tribe, and referred the City to UAIC, Wilton Rancheria, and Shingle Springs. All three of these tribes had already received Project notices, as descibed above. None of the other tribes responded to the opportunity to consult.

Evoluolion of Tribol Culiurol Resources
Questions a (i!: No lmpact. Based on the records search atthe NCIC and other efforts discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, no resources listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic resources of local register or historical resources were identified. The proiect would have no impact.

Question a (ii): Less than significant with mitigation. lnformation about tribal cultural resources under AB 52 and tribal cultural places under SB 18 was drawn from multiple sources, including the tribal consultation as summarized above, records searches and literature reviews with the California Historical Resources lnformation System, a review of existing ethnographic information, and a cultural resources survey (HELIX 2021) that included an analysis of buried site potential. Of these sources, most did not result in any information to indicate the presence of a tribal cultural resource or a tribal cultural place within the Project Area. Only the tribal consultation process, summarized above, produced information that requires further discussion.

The UAIC submitted information that heritage trees, in general, are important to the tribal community because they "have born witness to history and human interactions and are thought to hold a collective memory that is remembered and passed down from generation to generation. These resources also provide continuity between the past, present, and future." UAIC also noted that "heritage trees not only provide an important ecological function, but they also play an important role in UAIC's social and cultural identity" (Appendix l). According to the arborist survey for the project, one of the nine native oak trees present on the property is considered a heritage tree. This heritage tree will remain in place with a suitable buffer during construction to maintain tree integrity and minimize impact to the root zone, trunk, and canopy.

CEQA and SB 18 require that the City measure the information about the importance of heritage trees against the definitions of tribal cultural resources and tribal cultural places, as cited in Section 2LO7a@l of the PRC and Sections 5097.9 and 5097.995 of the PRC, respectively, while taking into account the City of Folsom 726 March2A22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
expert knowledge of the Tribe. First, Section 2lJTalal of the PRC defines tribal cultural resource for the purpose of AB 52 and CEQA. While heritage oak trees are not resources that are made, modified, or moved by a human, and do not constitute cultural resources, and although the field survey by professional archaeologists did not reveal any indication that past human activitywas associated with the specific heritage tree in the Project Area, the UAIC ascribes additional importance to heritage trees and recommended avoidance and preservation to the City. The information provided does not provide substantial evidence, as defined in PRC Section 21080, about the one oak tree would, specifically, qualify as a TCR, but the recommendation to avoid it is consistent with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and the Project's plans. ln addition, UAIC informed the City that standard mitigation measures for unanticipated discovery would be sufficient for any TCRs that are archaeological in nature, if encountered during construction (see Mitigation Measure TCR-1, below). Second, Sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 of the PRC define the types of resources that would constitute a tribal cultural place pursuant to SB 18. Neither tribal consultation nor examination of other lines of evidence revealed the presence of any resource meeting these definitions.

Therefore, although the information provided about heritage trees does not meet the criteria for being considered a TCR under CEQA, the importance of heritage trees to the tribal community should be recognized as such, and taken into account for future project planning in Folsom. For this project, because the single heritage tree present on the property will be preserued in place, there would be no impact to a known TCR or a tribal cultural place. However, there remains the possibility that grounddisturbing activity could reveal the presence of a TCR or tribal cultural place that is archaeological in nature, and if present, the effect could be adverse. As supported by UAIC, implementation of unanticipated discovery procedures, as provided in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 below, would reduce that impact to a less than significant level (ECORP 2022).

Mitigation Measure TCR-I: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources. lf any suspected TCRs are discovered during ground disturbing constructaon activities, all work shall cease within 100-feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the Project Area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC 521074). The Tribal Representative will make recommendations for further evaluation and culturally appropriate treatment as necessary. lf deemed necessary by the City, a qualified cultural resources specialist meeting the Secretary of lnterior's Standards and Qualifications for Archaeology may also assess the significance of the find in joint consultation with Native American Representatives to ensure that Tribal values are considered. Work at the discovery location may not resume until the City, in consultation as appropriate and in good faith, determines that all necessary investigation and treatment of the discovery under the requirements of CECLA, including A852, have been satisfied.

City of Folsom t27 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XVIII. UTITITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
UTITITIES AND SERVICE SYSIEMS:

Would the project:

Potentlal
lmpect
Less Than
Slgnlficant
wlth
Mltlgatlon
Le33 Than
Slgnlflcant
lmpact lmpact
No
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
tr tr
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
n n
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
n n I
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
n DI
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
n .
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
n
Environmentol Settlng
Existing utilities on the project site include SMUD for electricity, PG&E underground gas lines, AT&T underground telephone lines, City of Folsom for solid waste disposal, and City of Folsom water and sewer facilities. The City of Folsom employs a design process that includes coordination with potentially affected utilities as part of project development. ldentifying and accommodating existing utilities is part of the design process, and utilities are considered when finalizing public project plans. The City of Folsom coordinates with the appropriate utility companies to plan and implement any needed accommodation of existing utilities, including water, sewer, telephone, gas, electricity, and cable television lines. Based on the results of an initial request for comments from the utility providers, all utility services are able to accommodate the proposed project' Evoluolion of Utllltles ond Service Systems
Questions a, b, e: No lmpact. The City of Folsom is responsible for managing and maintaining its wastewater collection system. This system ultimately discharges into the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District interceptor sewer system, Wastewater is treated at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, located in Elk Grove (City of Folsom 2018).

City of Folsom 128 March2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
ln compliance with the 2006 State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems, the City of Folsom adopted a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) on July 28, 2009. The SSMP has been revised every five years, with the newest version approved on July 23,201-9.The plan outlines how the municipality operates and maintains the collection system, and the reporting of all Sanitary Sewer Overflows (5SO) to the SWRCB's online 55O database.

Because the City has sufficient capacity to accommodate any additional demand that could result from implementation of the proposed project, and because the City is in compliance with statutes and regulations related to wastewater collection and treatment, there would be no impact and mitigation would not be necessary.

Question cr Less than Significant lmpact. Folsom's Public Works Department handles all stormwater management issues for the City, from design and construction of the storm drain system to operation and maintenance, and urban runoff pollution prevention (City of Folsom 2018). Stormwater drains would be installed throughout the site, and curb and gutter would be installed along the parking areas to collect stormwater flows and prevent flooding or ponding. On-site stormwater management facilities would include bioretention basins, Contech filters, and disconnected roof drains which would treat and dissipate stormwater prior to entering the City's system. With implementation of these measures, environmental impacts from expanding the stormwater facilities would be less than significant and no mitigation would be necessary.

Question d: less than Significant lmpact.

Water Supplv
Folsom's Water Treatment Plant has a capacity of 50 million gallons per day. According to the City of Folsom General Plan Housing Element, the combination of treated and untreated water demands (through the time frame of the Housing Element which is 202L1are not anticipated to exceed the City's current water entitlements of 34,000 acre-feet annually (City of Folsom 2013). Because sufficient supplies are available, no additional facilities would need to be constructed or expanded and impacts would be less than significant.

Question f, g; No Impact. The City of Folsom provides solid waste, recycling, and hazardous materials collection services to its residential and business communities. ln order to meet the State mandated 50 percent landfill diversion requirements stipulated under AB 939, the City has instituted several community-based programs. The City offers a door-to-door collection program for household hazardous and electronic waste, in addition to six "drop off" recycling locations within the City. An offsite sewer analysis was completed by Water Works Engineering, at the request of the City of Folsom. The analysis concluded that the backbone of the existing sewer collection system has the capacity to support the development (Water Works Engineering 2021).

After processing, solid waste is taken to the Kiefer Landfill, the primary municipal solid waste disposal facility in Sacramento County. The landfill facility sits on a site of 1,084-acres in the community of Sloughhouse. Currently 250-acres, the State permitted landfill is 650-acres in size and is of sufficient capacity to accommodate the solid waste disposal needs of the City of Folsom. Because the landfill serving the project area is of sufficient capacity to accommodate solid waste needs, no impact would occur, and no mitigation would be necessary.

City of Folsom 129 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
XIX. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFIC.ANCET
Would the project:

Potenllal
lmpact
Less Than
Sltnlficant
wlth
Mlthatlon
Le$ Than
Slgnilicant
lmpact lmpact
No
The lead agency shall find that a project may have a significant effect on the environment and thereby require an EIR to be prepared for the project where there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that any of the following conditions may occur. Where prior to commencement of the
environmental analysis a project proponent agrees to MMs or project modifications that would avoid any significant effect on the environment or would mitigate the significant
environmental effect, a lead agency need not prepare an EIR solely because without mitigation the environmental effects would have been significant (per Section 15055 ofthe State CEQA Guidelines):
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
tr I un
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of past, present and probable future projects)?
t
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
I n
Envlronmentol Setling
Evoluolion of Mondotory Flndings of Significonce
euestion a: Less than Significant with mitigation. The preceding analysis indicates that the proposed project has the potential to adversely affect biological, cultural, and tribal cultural resources. See Sections lV, V, and XVll of this lnitial Study for discussion of the proposed project's potential impacts on these environmental issue areas. With implementation of the mitigation measures identified in those Sections, and compliance with City programs and requirements identified in this report, impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. No significant or potentially significant impacts would remain City of Folsom 130 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Question b: Less than Significant with mitigation. While the project would indirectly contribute to cumulative impacts associated with increased urban development in the city and region, these impacts have previously been evaluated by the City and considered in development of the City's General Plan as set forth in this lnitial Study. Key areas of concern are discussed in detail below.

Evaluati&af cumulotile bioloalcal resaurces lmoacts: lmplementation of the proposed project, with continued growth within Folsom would contribute to continued loss of habitat for biological resources by converting undeveloped area to developed uses. There is currently no suitable habitat for specialstatus plant species in the project site and there have been no reported occurrences of special-status plant species on or adjacent to the project site in the CNDDB. Special-status plant species are not expected to occur in the project site or be impacted by the proposed project. No special-status wildlife species were observed in the project site during the biological reconnaissance survey and there are no reported occurrences in the CNDDB of special-status animal species in or adjacent to the project site.

However, the project site provides marginal habitat for burrowing owl (Afhene cuniculorio) and whitetailedkite (Elanusleucuruslaswell ashabitatfornestingbirdsandraptorssuchasthemourningdove (Zendido mduoural, house finch {Haemorhous mexiconusl, and acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus). Nests were not observed during surveys; however, a variety of migratory birds have the potential to nest in and adjacent to the project site, in trees, shrubs and on the ground in vegetation.

With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-01 and BIO-02, the potential impacts to the burrowing owl and the nesting birds and raptors due to project implementation would be reduced to a less than significant level. Additionally, there are a total of 14 trees found on the project site; one tree (#702) is on Lot 1 and the remaining trees are on Lot 5. Nine of the trees are blue oaks, three are cork oaks, and two are valley oaks. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-03, trees in the project site would be protected from removal and from ground disturbance and potential impacts would be minimized. As a result, with implementation of Mitigation Measures BI0-01,-02, and -03 the proposed project would not result in significant cumulative impacts to protected biological resources, and no additional mitigation measures would be needed.

Evoluation of cumulative cultural resources lmpacts: A database records search was conducted for the project site, including a 0.25-mile buffer area, at the North Central lnformation Center at Sacramento State University. Additionally, a pedestrian survey was undertaken of the project site by a senior archaeologist. The City recognizes that sensitive and/or protected resources could be unintentionally discovered during project construction. With implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-01 and CUL02, the impacts relating to unanticipated discoveries would be reduced to a less than significant level and potentially cumulative effects would be avoided, No additional mitigation measures would be needed.

Evaluotion of cumulative oreenhouse aos (GHGI lmodcts: GHG emissions would be generated by the project during construction (vehicle engine exhaust from construction equipment, on-road hauling trucks, vendor trips, and worker commuting trips) and during long-term operation (electricity and natural gas use, electricity resulting from water consumption; solid waste disposal, and vehicle engine exhaust).GHG impacts were evaluated the City's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Consistency Checklist, which was completed by HELIX. The project would be consistent with the City's GHG Strategy through Mitigation Measures GHG-l through -5, Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would provide a minimum of five percent more bicycle parking than required in the City's Municipal Code Section 17.57.090 (for a total of 54 bicycle parking spaces). Mitigation Measure GHG-2 would use high-performance diesel (also known as Diesel-HPR or Reg-9000/RHD) for all diesel-powered equipment utilized in construction of the project. Mitigation Measure GHG-3 would provide electric vehicle charging stations in five percent of City of Folsom 131 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
the total surface parking spaces on the project site (for a total of 16 EV charging stations). Mitigation Measure GHG-4 would divert to recycle or salvage a minimum 65 of nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated at the project site in accordance with Appendix A4 (Residential) of the as outlined in the California Green Building Standards Code (2019 CALGreen). Mitigation Measure GHG-5 would comply with all applicable indoor and outdoor water efficiency and conservation measures required under 2019 CALGreen Tier 1, as outlined in the California Green Building Standards Code. With Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through -5, potentially cumulative impacts would be avoided, and no additional mitigation measures would be needed.

Evaluotion of cufiu.lotive noise impocts: Noise impacts were evaluated in Noise Analysis, prepared by Bollard Acoustical, May 3, 2O2I and revised by HELIX in 202t. Construction noise generated by the project would result in short-term substantial noise increases compared to baseline existing conditions The implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would restrict construction to daytime and minimize noise levels to surrounding residential uses. With this mitigation, potentially cumulative impacts would be avoided, and no additional mitigation measures would be needed.

Evaluation of cumulotive transportation impacts: Cumulative transportation im pacts were evaluated in the Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Transportation lmpact Study (T. Kear Transportation Planning and Management, lnc., 2021). Under existing 2021 conditions with the project, the westbound left-turn queue during the AM peak hour exceeds available storage, and the project is anticipated to add 1 vehicle to the queue. Additional queued vehicles can contribute to LOS impacts when queues are longer than available storage and "spill-back" can affect the capacity of adjacent lanes. ln order to avoid impacts to the westbound left-turn queue during the AM peak, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would be implemented. Additionally, under the EPAP 2026 conditions with the project, the westbound left-turn queue during the AM peak hour exceeds the available storage, and the project is anticipated to add 1 vehicle to the queue, contributing to potential LOS impacts. Similar to the existing 2021 conditions, in order to avoid impacts to the westbound left-turn queue, Mitigation Measure TRA-2 would be implemented. With implementation of Mitigation Measures TRA-1 and TRA-2, the project would have a less than significant effect on traffic operations under 2021 conditions and under 2026 conditions with the addition of project traffic. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact to project circulation under cumulative conditions.

Evaludtion of cumulotive tribal culturol resources imnqctl: The City of Folsom sent project notification letters to the three California Native American tribes named on the City's AB 52 contact list. The only tribe to respond was the UAIC. On behalf of the City, ECORP contacted the California NAHC, to request a list of tribal contacts under SB 18. The two tribes to respond were UAIC and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation.

UAIC informed the City that standard mitigation measures, Mitigation Measure TCR-I, for unanticipated discovery would be sufficient for any TCRs that are archaeological in nature, if encountered during construction. As supported by UAIC, implementation of unanticipated discovery procedures, as provided in Mitigation Measure TCR-I, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and therefore, potentially cumulative impacts would be avoided. No additional mltigation would be required.

Question c: Less than Significant lmpact. Because of site conditions, existing City regulations, and regulation of potential environmental impacts by other agencies, the proposed project would not have the potential to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings as demonstrated in the evaluation contained in this lnitial Study,
city of Folsom t32 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
Table 33. LOS Cumulative Plus Conditions
Signal
Warrant?
No
LOS
BB
c
c
Construction Year
+ Project
Delay

15.5 15.5
24,4

18.0 Signal
LOS Warrant?
BBc
PM Peak Hour
Construction Year
No Proiect
Delav

16.6 76.2

24.3 Signal
Warrant?
No
LOS
cc
B
B
Construction Year
+ Proiect
Delav

20.3 23.3

15.5 77.3
Signal
Ios3 Warrant?a
c
c
B
AM Peak Hour
Construction Year
No Proiect
Delaf

20.2 22.8

16.5 Traffic
Control
SignalSignal
Signal
Side-St.

STOP5
lntersection
lron Point
Road/McAdooDrivelron Point
Road/Oak
Avenue Parkway
lron PointRoad/RowberryDrivelron PointRoad/Project
Access
Reference: Transportation Research Board, Highwoy Copacity Manual - fr Edition,2016.

Average control delay (seconds per vehicle).

Level of service.
"Peak Hou/' signal warrant from "Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals" of the Colifornio Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, November 7,2OL4. s Delav value represents the worst-case movement/approach, Source: Griffin Cove Transportation Consulting 2018b.

Notes:

City of Folsom 133 March2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
IO.O MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORIING

PROGRAM
A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared by the City per Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines and is presented in Appendix J.

I 1.0 INITIAT STUDY PREPARERS
CIW of Folsom
Steve Banks, Principal Planner
Mark Rackovan, Traffic Engineer
HELIX Environmental Plannine. lnc.

Robert Edgerton, AICP CEP, Principal Planner
Julia Pano, Environmental Planner
Jason Runyan, Noise Specialist
Stephen Stringer, Senior Biologist
Stephanie McLaughlin, Field Biologist
Victor Ortiz, Air Quality Specialist
Martin Rolph, Air Quality/Energy Specialist
Cla rus Backes, Senior Archaeologist
John DeMartino, GIS
City of Folsom 134 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND

12.0 REFERENCES
Arborwell. 2O2L. Arborist Report. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments. Folsom, CA.

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, lnc. 2021.. Letter: Noise Monitoring and Analysis Conducted for the Folsom Corporate Center Lot 1 Apartments. May 3.

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2017. State Area Designations and Maps. Accessed on October 4, 2021 at httos://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maos-state-and-federal-areadesiqnations httos:l/www.arb.ca.sov/adam/index.html.
2017. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Accessed on March 28,2078 and available at httos://www.arb.ca.sov/cclscopinsplan/scopins plan 2017.pdf. 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan-A Framework For Change.

California Department of Conservation. 2018a. California lmportant Farmland Finder. Accessed October L2, 2021 at httos://maos.conservation.ca.Eov/dlrp/clffl 20188. California Geological Surveu. Accessed on October 4,2O2t al httos:l/maps.conservation.ca. gov/egs/fam/
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2021. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB); For: Folsom SE, Buffalo Creek, Carmichael, Roseville, Rocklin, Pilot Hill, Citrus Heights, Folsom, and Clarksville USGS 7.5-minute series quadrangles, Sacramento, CA. Accessed October 6,2021. 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. March.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2021. EnviroStor. Accessed on October 14,2021 at:
httns;//www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.eov/public/
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).2022. Traffic Census Program, Available at https://dot.ca.gov/proeramsltraffic-operations/census. Accessed February 2O22. 2009. Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS). November.
2011, Map of Officially Designated Scenic Highways in Sacramento County. Accessed October 4, 2021. httos://dot.ca.sov/orosrams/desisn/lapJandscaoe-architecture-and-communiWliva bilitv/lao-liv-i-scenic-hiehwavs California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2021. lnventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-03 0.39) For: Folsom 5E, Buffalo Creek, Carmichael, Roseville, Rocklin, Pilot Hill, Citrus Heights, Folsom, and Clarksville USGS 7.5-minute series quadrangles, Sacramento, CA. Accessed October 6,2O2I.

City of Folsom 135 March 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
ECORP Consulting. 2021.Tribal Cultural Resources Technical memo. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments.

Folsom, CA.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2012. FEMA Flood Map Service Center, Accessed October 14, 2O2]- and available at https;//msc,fema.gov/portal Folsom, City of. 2015. City of Folsom Municipal Code. Updated July and available at http: /lwww.codeou b I ishi np,com/CA/Folsom/.
2020. Evacuation Plan. Published July 22,2020, Available at; https://www.folsom.ca.us/home/showpublisheddocument/222916374785913375"700Q0 2018. City of Folsom Draft General Plan 2035. Published 2018. 2015. City of Folsom Standard Construction Specifications. Updated April 2015. 2015. City of Folsom Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Updated 20L5. 2013. City of Folsom General Plan Housing Element. Updated October 2013. 1992. City of Folsom East Area Facilities Plan.
1988. Folsom General Plan. Adopted October31,1988.

Geotechnical Consultants, lnc. (Geocon Consulting) 2003. GEOLOGY: Folsom Lake State Recreation Area.

April 2003. Available
at: https://www.parks. ca.sov/paees/500/f il es/6eoloev.pdf HELIX Environmental Planning. 2O21. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments. Folsom, CA.

HELIX Environmental Planning. 2021. Biological Resources lnventory. Folsom Corporate Center HELIX Environmental Planning. 2021. Cultural Resources Assessment. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments. Folsom, CA.

HELIX Environmental Planning. 2021. Health Risk Assessment, Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Folsom, CA.
lntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (lPCC}. 2007. Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the lntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. February. Available at:
https://www.ipcc.chlreport/ar4lwe1/.

Natural Resources Conservation Seruice, United Stated Department of Agriculture (NRCS). 2018. Soil Survey of Folsom Corporate Center Apartments in Sacramento County, California. Accessed October 4, 2021at htto://websoilsury.e.y,Jrrcs.usda.eov.

City of Folsom 136 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMN D
Nation EnvironmentalTitle Research (NETR) Online. 2021. HistoricalAerials. Accessed online October 15 2O2]- at: httos://www.historicaerials.com/
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Available at:
httos://gehha.ca.sov/airlcrnrlnotice-adoption-air-toxics-hot-snots-proeram-Euidance-manual' preparatioF-health-risk-0.

RSC Engineering,2021-- Preliminary Water Quality Report for Lot 1 and Lot 5. Folsom Corporate Center Apartment Complex. Folsom, CA.

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG). 20t9.2020 MTP/SCS. November 18. Available at:
httns://www.sacoF.ore/2020-metropolitan-transBortation-plansustainable-communitiesstrateEv.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAqMD). 2O20a. Guide to Air Quality Assessment in Sacramento County. Revised April. Available at:
htto://www.airoualiw.orelResidents/CEQA-Land-Use-Plannins/CEQA-Guidance-Tpols. 2O2Ob. Mobile sources Air Toxics Protocol. Available at:
httos://www.airoualiW.!rrFlBusinesses/CEQA-Land-Use-Planninq/Mobile-Sources-Air-ToxicsProtocol. 2019. Recommendations for Siting New Projects Near Existing Sources that Emit Odors and Toxic Air Contaminants. July. Available at:
httns://www.airoualitv.orelLandUseTransportation/Documents/ExlstineOdorsToxicsRecommen dationsFinalT-24-19. pdf .
2017. Sacramento Regional 2008 NAAQS 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan. July. Available at:
htto://www.airoualiW.orn/ProsramCoordination/DocumentslSacTo20ReEional%202008%20NAA Q5%20Attainment%20a nd%20RFP%20Plan.odf .

SCS Engineers. (2021). Biological Resources Memo. 2021
State Divisaon of Mines and Geology. 2015. United States Seismic Zones Map T. KearTransportation Planning and Management, lnc. 2O2t.Traflic lmpact Study. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments. Folsom, CA.

Transportation Research Board. 2016. Highway Capacity Manual-6th Edition. Accessed on February 20, 20 18 at htto://www.trb.orqlM ain/Blurbs/175169.aspx.

US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). 1992.

US Department of Transportation (USDOT). 2008. Roadway Construction Noise Model version 1.1 Available. at; https/www.fhwa.dot.eov/environment/noise/construction noise/rcnm/.

City of Folsom L37 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments ISMND
2004. Traffic Noise ModelVersion 2,5. Available at:
https;//www.fhwa.dot.eov/environmqntlnoiseltraffic nois-e rnodel/tnm v25/.

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2018. Nonattainment areas for criteria pollutants. Accessed on March 28, 2Atg at httos:/lwww.epa.qov/sreen-book
20L8. Superfund National Priority List Accessed on October t4,2021al https://www.eoa.sov/suoerfund/superfund-national-oriorities-list'nol.

US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Information for Planning and Consultation (lPaC). List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location and/or be affected by your proposed project.

Water Works Engineers, 2021. Sewer Capacity Analysis. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments. Folsom, cA.

Zeiner, D.C., W.F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988-1990. California's Wildlife. Vol l-lll. California Depart. of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. city of Folsom 138 March2O22

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Attachment No. 23
SMAQMD ISMND Response Letter, dated March 24,2022

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

SACRAM ENTO M ETROPOLITAN
AIR a
ME
UALITY

MANAGE NI DTSTRICT
March 24,2022
Steven Banks
City of Folsom Community Development Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom Cordova, CA 95630
[email protected]
Subject: Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Mitigated Negative Declaration (SAC202102624) Dear Steven Banks
Thank you for providing the Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) to the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (Sac Metro Air District) for review. The project includes a general plan amendment, rezone, planned development permit, design review and tree removal permit, for the construction and operation of a 253-unit multi-family apartment community on two parcels in the Folsom Corporate Center. Sac Metro Air District staff comments to improve health and air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) follow.

Comments on the MND
The Air Quality section of the MND includes measure AIR-1, requiring a mechanical ventilation system that accommodates filters having a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) rating of 13 or higher to reduce resident exposure to toxic air contaminant emissions from Highway 50. Note that this is already required by the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.

To provide further protection of residents, Sac Metro Air District recommends:
e The landscape plan includes a continuous vegetative barrier along the southern, western, dnd eastern perimeter of the project consistent with the Sac Metro Air District's Londscoping Guidance for lmproving Air Quality Neor Roodways.r lf a continuous barrier along the perimeter is not feasible, provide dense plantings where feasible and especially between the outdoor gathering areas and HighwaY 50.

The GHG section of the MND notes that the project includes onsite photovoltaic electricity generation, demonstrating consistency with Folsom's GHG Reduction Strategy measure E-1, Building Energy Sector Sac Metro Air District recommends the project consider additional energy related measures, which provide a co-benefit of reducing the urban heat island effect:
l Sac Metro Air District Landscaping Guidance:
lltto://www.airoualitv.orglLandUseTransoortation/Documents/LandscaoinsGuidanceforlmorovineAirQualitvNearR oadwavsMav2020V2.odf
777 Lzth Street, Ste. 300 . Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel:279-2O7-!122 . Toll Free: 800-880-9025
Airquality.org

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
a
a
Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Miti8ated Negative Declaration

lnstall certified cool roofs. The California Energy Commission's Title 24, Part 5,2 suggests an aged solar reflectance of at least 0.63 for low-sloped roofs and at least 0.20 for steep-sloped roofs, and a minimum thermal emittance of 0.75. The Cool Roof Rating Council provides a product directonf of roofs to assist, Cool roofs reduce the temperature of the buildings, requiring less energy to keep the buildings cool in the summer.
lnstall solar photovoltaic shade structures over the parking lot planned under the overhead power lines on lot 1 since tree planting will be constrained. This will reduce urban heat island effect from the parking lot, generate renewable energy, and provide shading to parked vehicles to reduce their emissions of volatile organic compounds.

Comments on Site Design
Sac Metro Air District commends the project for providing infill housing near jobs and commercial uses, which can lead to reduced vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and reduced emissions. To further provide the opportunity for residents to reduce VMT, supporting Folsom General Plan Policies M 2.1.3 - Pedestrian and Bicycle Linkages, M 3.1.1* Access to Public Transit, and NCR 3.1.3 - Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled, Sac Metro Air District recommends the following improvements in bicycle/pedestrian connectivity:
o lnclude a direct connection from the north side of lot 6 to lron Point Road. Convenient access to the existing sidewalks and bike lanes on lron Point Road will connect lot 6 residents to the nearby transit stop and other commercial areas along lron Point Road. e lnclude a complete sidewalk network along the unnamed road bordering lot 5 and along Rowberry Drive bordering lot 1 to minimize pedestrian barriers and provide safe, convenient connections for residents to the surrounding land uses. r Consider including a pedestrian gate from lot l that could allow a future connection to the planned class 1 bicycle trail south of the project, along Highway 50.

Rules Statement
All projects are subject to Sac Metro Air District rules in effect at the time of construction. A link to a list of the most common rules that apply during construction is included in the footnote.a A complete listing of rules is available at www.airouality,gr8 or by calling 279-207-1722.

Naturally Occurring Asbestos
The project site is in an area that may contain naturally occurringasbestos, as identified on Sac Metro Air District's Naturally Occurring Asbestos in Eastern Sacramento County Parcels map.s Areas identified on the map are required priorto construction to eithersubmit an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan ortest out of the requirements of the Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Operations. More information can be found on the Sac Metro Air District's website6 or by contacting Daniel Noakes at 915-826-6366 or [email protected]. Folsom's construction specifications also include a reminder of these requirements. 2 California Energy Commission, Title 24,Part 6: https:l/www.enerev.ca.eov/slte{defaulVfi!e{29&06/CEC-400. 201E-020--C|/F O.pdf
3 Cool Roof Rating Council product directory: httos:/,/coolroofs.orqldirectorv 4 Rules Statement: htto:/lwwW.airquality,orB/LandUsffransportationlDocuments/RulesAttachmentl0- 2020Final.pdf
s Asbestos map: http://www.airqualitv.ore/Statlonarv5ources/Documents/NoA Parcels rGdux.fflJ 5 Sac Metro Air District's asbestos website: htto://www.alroualitv.orelbusinesses,/asbestoslasbestos-ln-soil

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Mitigated Negative Declaration

Please contact me at 279-207-L73t or khusE@alrqualiw,ors if you have any questions regarding these commentsSincerely,
K"""^ t+€
Karen Huss
Associate Air Quality Planner/Analyst
cc Paul Philley, AICP, CEQA and Land Use Program Supervisor

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

Attachment No. 24
Folsom Corporate Center Planned Development Guidelines

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
r9T59HI C9RP9NATT CTHTTR
PTANNED DEVTTgTHTNT CUIDEUINE5
15 ]r{atch 2000, reviseJ 2LJu'." 2000

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

DTUN:9PHTilT STANDARDS
I 'Gtrl Gros, BoilJi,'g Area: I,425,00O square feet, pro''rideJ .ll b'ilJitg anJ site designs meet all Je*,"lopm"nt sturrJa.J..

I B.tilJug S"tbu"h*
' Front yard:3A'along Iron Point Road.
' SiJc yarl, 5' or as required by L*ilJi.g coJe.
' She.t side yarJ: 15'.
' Rear y".J, No requirement except as requiteJ Ly L*ildittg "oJ" o, other r.qoitements. ' HigLway 50 Lontagle: 50 ["et.
r B'fJi'g HeigLt":
' 4 story not to
"xceed
8O'* at parapets.
3 atory, not to ,*"r"d 60'* ut parapets.
; 2 story, not to exceeJ 40" at parapefu.
.
-B,rlJng huight may increaee at speci{ic areas reguireJ {o, *".ltttti""l screening.

I B"ilJitrg Coverage: no requirementI Pu.tittg Req,irsmsnls' OSio.": 1 sp.ce per 250 slluare {""t of gross fl.oor area.

Com-"r"irf r:r", rrrd oth"r u.r"illury retail: 1 space per 200 Fquare {"ut o{ grose floor area.

I All ."q,rir"J pu.L;t g o."u, -ill rneet City o{ Folro* requirements for Jitountions,,paving, l;".Ll"J p"'LLg, u,rJ ti"y"l" "u"kr, p", chapbr 77,57 o{ tL" Fol.om Zoning CoJ"s.

I RJestrian regulations:
. PrimJry r"lt*"y"
",i11
]i,"t slreet access, tus stops, puthittg uru"r, "t d boildittgt ' P"d"striau sa{ety atd hu"lth *i11 b* a Jesign {o"us.
' V"lk*.y, *ill b.ltoJr"up"J to ptorriJ" surnmer tL.J"- Purhittg "."", will feature peJestrian so..ectors withjn p"ttiog stalls to {o"ilitrt" sa{e tra.r"l tlrough tlt putLirrg """".
. ft*ho"d/"o1ot"J paviag, or a cL-nge to materials, *ill d"litt"ute peJeskian coffrectors at intersections wit]. pr.Liog .r"". utJ d.irr"r. Landscaping -ill delineute . peJeskian *ull, "lt"*Ltt". ' birubl"J u"""r, *ill "oo{o.* to State u',d F"JetulADA regJations' I Bi"ycl" regJations:
. AJ.quate space u.rJ u"""r, o.ill b" p.oviJed fot bity"l" .u"Lu p", Folto- 'Lontng CoJe 77 .57 .A90.
' Bicy"l" ,u"L, *ill t" pto'*,iJ"J tt... t.tddittgl entrances' I Lordittg Areus,
' Loudin! areas *ill b" ,"t""rr"d ftot't p.r-bli" view by lund"""pittg, *ullr, o, othcr rneans to minimize their visilillLy kornpJli. streets. VL"r" strucf.,rul screen t.r.iers ur. or"J, ttuy slrull te a r*inirnu* o{ 6 feet in k"ight to alequutely }'iJ" eguipment "ttd loudi.tg utuut.
. Matetiul, us"d {o, ,".""r, barriers ulroJJ b" "ornputitl. tt d sirnilat in qualily to materials ,r"d fo. tLat site's b,,,;lJiogt
Foi"o- Corpor"i"'tCtr,i"t Pln'otud Dto"lopment Guid..lit"s ' i: " Page 11

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
5lTT DtsrcN
..rir'i-:iii::."ir,
D"{iorJ *itL LoJtot
Routes Jiffer"ntiated
materialsEl**'"t ts
and mat.rials.
,p""iA" pallette" of luttJt".p"
,.-1 ..
r '\'':::il....l. j' -.'
,
rllFAnffq'ip, l/itlG:,,,,
I Slg.riA", entries, emphasizes intersections, creates i#ot*ul meeting plo.ur.

I AJds clurify between pedestrian uoJ d;t i.rg routes.

I M.y be of "*lor."d A.C. paving o. ,ol.rr*d concrete, or "tpot*d agpreSate'
I
I
r
ping
with
Mll .nr. navigation tkough pu.tng {i"lJt t" ur'd to* "
fJJi''g.
' .t.l
Differentiated ty utut
"ed
p"ning.

LocateJ *L".u p.d"rLrian conreectors intersect parling areas or Jri,n.r.

Not requireJ at every rou
t
I
I
Folso; t;rporatc C"t t"' pl"or,.J Dt*'.luf-"rtt G,ti'Joiit "s Pafe 12

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

I ili D15icN
-l-h" Folror.r Corporate Center Pluorred D".o"lop*urrt GuiJelines, in respect to ovettll architecturol I d"rigr, "oooupti are intendeJ to proviJe " &.*u*ork {or d"sign, not restrict creativity. B.dJi"g J".'"lopriunt, .tJ"o"orrtug"J to shur" a corunon architectural language, be sensitive to energy conservation, .tJ ,"rpooJ to outwarJ site {orces. pl ordur"d by majoruourlo,uyr, dru orrur*ll site is higl,ly ,,i"$le. Sn ce tl* lxildiogr *ill b" visiblu D [.^ iOO J"g*ur, no el"o"tio' ou' b".rll*J t}iu bu"h "od Jusign tltould r"rpood *""o"Jittgly, zuaiJ *"ru", ,io.,,lJ t" *"J, ho*.r, in scale, present varieJ elevutions onJ ,rr" accent materials to uJJ to tke variety.
lVlutu;"I, ,,r"h os tile, stone, glass, metal puo"lr, anJ co,rcret*, lulr*,, ,.seJ togethe4 will teflect thu I : I "*"t -ri"J* Jiv"rsity]"nitruJitio.rr, wirilu rnai:rtaining a hotmoruo.,s.rciationskf .*t* dr" oth", structures, J"r"lop*"trts, ond communities irr tlre vicini$'. J'he materisl* tttoJ shull be consistent o,;tk tlror. *"rrtin"d *i,Lt, drur* Pl.,'r,ed Duunl,rprrru't 6o;Jelines, as "ppro,rod lty dto
City o{ Folro* Plan:ring Comrnission.

Folso* Co"pot"tu C";i;;'Pl"t tr"J D".r.l"p-.tr G,'i J.lio", Pat'e 14

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

ARCNITTCTURAT DT5|CN G",n".rl
I
I
t
I
.:
.j,j ::-::1 j.,ti.
,,',: - @[J[ML[ ;i], PR?JtCY _
.::-t... :e......,,jJ{, .:.. j !
Bdldirg forms r"lote to a speciAc site, proviJing variety "nJ interest.

AccentuateJ .ith "oloq llgLtitg, utJ lu.tJr"upit g.

Coneistent ** o{ elerrrents vil *t{y structures.

Grou"u oI N.ti.r" Out. "ru an irnportant Jesign eloment.

E TL" tdldi.g tur. .r., te articJateJ ..rJ J"{i',.J *ith Jrrt"r.olor. or materials. f Pedeskian visuul ioterest sLall te *rengtheo"J -i{r patterns, textures or materials where appropriate, ,o"k .. th",rr" o{. nrtural stone to accent o b,tildittg't entries.

I Materials:
, P;mary ,.'tfr". rnaterials ,hull .o.''r.. no more than B0% of the exterior veriicJ *ull, rrrd -.y L. tilt-up concrete, pre-cast concrete, E*t".iot InsJuted Fittl.lt ' System, glass, al*rninum p".,."lr, alurnilurn winJow {.u*"*, o. metal pu.t"lt. . Accent rnaterials -ill "o'rr",
approximately 20"/" o{ the "rt.rior vertical *ullt utd
*ny i.r"lrrd" stone, metal or "lu.ninum pun"lr, slate, or tile.

Fol.o* Co.por.t" Center Plu;r;a Dr.'"lop*et i GoiJ.litr." '

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

ARCH|TTCTURAU DE5ICN rl l';. Llz".'ti
. ..,1, . at$? ./i r,'i I . ., -.
,,
i,,.*F;,[ll!,!gl!5 ::
. .: '--.il
f Entries ,hull b" di.tingoi"hrJ *;th accent materials, ,.r"L ., stone or slut", colotrJ t r"tul puo.lu, and co'crete.

I 'Eolun""J
paving ulr"ll b" .rs"J .t entrances, "itL"t u*lo.t.J A.C. pavileg, oolo."J concrete, o, "tpor.J aggregate.
t E"ta, fu"rJJ, *ly b" rccented with special lighting, sr"ooJury signage, graphics, o, "olor..

I Parapcts ,hull "orr""ol
ory ,oo{ mounted equipment a6 seen {'ot r- uJlu""rrt ,ouJs urtJ potLittg.

I M""t"rri"ul penthouse o,,"r""n {o.*, ut" ol* u"""ptutl" *h"tt {ittiJt"J to matcL it"ter,i"ls ,r.J or, .Jl.cent *ull ,rJ."rr. Tlr" purtdtot r. .holl mair:tail ^ sirtlar qttulity o{ conslmction.

I Clanges in parapet Leight *oy 1r. ,rr"J to Lr"p . Lrrrnorl ,"u1", t.""rrt entries, or articJate bJJittg eleme'tst Co11ri.", *ry t* .rroJ to prc,viJ* variely "rrJ "tp."., *" t.tJdit-tg {orm at L"y lo"utiot s. r,,J,,,;;''8n;;,111',mn;$i#;;i d;.;.[fi;;;;rtii!;iiil'i*] : :' :'i: :-:: ' : : p*g; 76

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

ANCf,|TTCTURAI DE5|GII Gu'"t"1
' 'rl'Ji!!!lY$';
SrnviCt i'::ARrAS '
(urvi"u u."nr, loudiog Jockr,
"rrd
trnrh
"r,."losure,
,h.ll b" eepar.ted [.o* pth" tpu.."-ty
"oliJ J Bcreen wulle or l"rdr."pu Lu$err. Tlu ,oouo rull d"tigt ult"ll b" consistent with the wall d"sigt rrrJ
"olom
of thu more prominettt l"ilJug elementst E*por"J ,ooliog or canopies, 'r"sibl" totrr t[." groturd, *uy bu metal, glass, sirnJated slate, or K"l*all glazing.

I Sunscreene *uy b" canva6, metal, ot Ktl*ull.

I E*t"rio. gLss.shali b" high p"Jo.*un"u glazing, .od *u.y L" "l"uq,
lryhdy tinteJ, refiective,
o. rpundt"l gl^rt.
f
Fol som Co"por"tt' C"t t"" Pl.t*" J D"v"loprrr"nt G,, i J.Jit . s Pafe 17

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

ARCN|TTCTURAI DTSIGN Exterior Lightitrg
I
r
I
!
I
I
r
I
Lrghtu *ill bu high pt"ttr'" rodi,'-.
\ffull u"""" rrr*y b" highlightuJ [y *"ll * rhiog fixbures.., Fol"ot, Corporate Center Pl-r-"J D".,"lopment GoiJ"lit.s Page L8

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
5iGNAGT
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
S|CN CRiT[ftiA:

Signs (di'uctio.rrl r.rd monument), risitrl" fio* tl-r" street, shall b" "oordit"t"J *ithitt tLt entirc development for th" mutual buou{it o{.ll occupatttt.

S/trilu fl."ibilif o{ Jesign is encourageJ, '*,;"o.1 !ru.*ooy ulull b" mainiaineJ.

A sign application fo, """h proiect rhull b. rr-b*i*uJ t" the City oI Folro,. Planning Department {or review "nJ uppro,nul prior to permit upprooul.

A1l sign applications "lrull "o*ply *itL the eign criteria, tL" City "{ ILhor., Sigtt fuqui'ements (chapter 17 -59), "ity b"ildittg "oJ"u, urrd tL" Ur.i{"t r,. S;gn CoJ., as &om tirne to tirne urrr"..J"d.

C"J""oity to the sign criteria "htll bt "tt""J by th" luodlotd.

A'y rorr-"oJorming or uxapproveJ sigo eLull be brought into coJonnity at tle tenant's expense,
Any sign betw"et 30" "trJ 6' ato.." the Jjacent
graJe at any coraer {o.-"J by an interaection o[2 o,
rnore streets sh.ll ,,ot otshuet th" cross-visibility
area as **rrr""J by a triangle Laving 2 siJes 35'
long aoJ rurrning along ..cL
"rrtL
lit ", tttd " t]titJ
siJe connecUtrg the ..rJt o{ t}t" otLtt 2lro"u.
35'-0" l--l C.ob
+
*
*
* Cl"ut
Vision
H- I
lnanfle
I FreestanJug monument signs rray b" pl.""J ;'' tk
lutdr""p" areas {acing colrunorr Jtives to iJenti{y tenants o{ ;oJi"ido"l[oilJ;"gt. . '
r Sigrrr rhull b" uJ;u""rrt to--a3ces3 d;'tr..*uyt. No mor. tL"'l one sign p", Jri.ru*uy tlrJl b. "llo*"J. r Sigrr, ,Lull b" located a ,,rlnimurn o{ 15 {""t {to'o th" f""L o{ tlru ".ob along Iron Point Road "r,J .ty internul dri't "', ;glrt of *uy *L"rt space permits. Slgtts tltJl b" pl"""d outside o{ .r"hi"r-rl"t sight lioes.
t Allor"tl" signs are sJject to "ll uppli".tlt otJirrurr""t of d-," City of frlro* Sign O.dio"nc".

I Sign size rlr"ll b" a rnaxirn'm o{ 6'-0" kigh by th"
maxirnum square {ootage o{ t"*l lor tLat sign.
t Monument "igt" "hJl te concrete, CMU uoJ/ot metal.
r Slg* rhull [";ll*ir"t J ty e*te'ior ground.'plightittg.

No internal illo*ir,"tio., uhull b" perrnifteJ.
.;.,[*.,,r, r''rp. rat* r .,,,";'Fil#;i n"','.,',prr,.l,r . ;,;,Ll'rrl, i r.::.i .1.; :' ):;l::

Ilag* i{}

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
5icNAGr
BrJiiLDinG 5icilS:

I TLre *urirn,'r., ullovl.tl" sign area is 7 112 square {eet {ot "u"h li.tt"ul {c,oI o{ b"ilJittg f,ontage, up to a maxirnum "l t50 square [e"t o,'' "u"h tJd:'rg.

I \[all signs "nJ "ot opy sigrr. ,lrull count towarJs the maximum sign area. t BrilJ;-g signs may b" pluouJ un b"ildittg Irontages {acing a street, puttittg lot, o, Highway S0 I Siglr" .h.11 .lot te l.,c"ted atorr. dr" top oI parapet, project more than 18 inches {to* t}t" trilJi^g *oll, tr,r. """""J 75 percent "f th. b,rilJi''g tontage.

I F e.shnding signs rL"1] br ,"t bu"t 5 feet fronr th" pJli" dght of *ry urd lo"rt"J outsiJe o{ "t y "1".r vision trianglee (see page 16). Signs *ill "ornply with .L"pter 17 .59 "l th" Fblsom Zooing CoJe.

Folro,,,- 0o'l,o'ot.'i;'i"; i;n'*;i' b;";l Pafc 20 "i,,i."* G' i J"[i,.u.

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

LANDsCATE DT5ICN
: ,.{Q!"3( ffl'l':
i:.,,
ft" Evergreen fblro,r, Project,horld servc as the transitio n zorLebetween tLe manictr.ee I omamentol latrde".pe o{ th" Btoudstorre l)eveloprnent "nJ th" out *oodl"rds aJjaceot to Highway 50. Thu tu* lunJ"".pe th""ld avoid creating a harJ uJge t"tween the n.tural ".rJ J".rulop"J Iutdto"p" by bti"gi-6 toth typer o[ planHngs into t]re project in a manner that allows the hansition zones to occr:r gittin tke pating lots a,.d l.rrJr"up" easements, t th", than at tLe perimeter of tL" sites,
pligh""y 5O passes t},ro,rgh out o,oodluo& "ll .long th" soutL siJ" o{ frlscrm rith th" "xception o{ I lth" east end "{ this prcjecf *L"r" no hees are present. As a part o{thi" prolect, thu out *oo.ll*"Jt *ill b" exleDJed east, along HigLway 50, to proviJ" u [t #"t &om tLe &.u*uy (th"re ertunJ"J .*ut urill not te consiJered o part o[ the "eommon rreu.s"). | "rrdr".pe areas *ill "nh"rrc" tLu o$i"" envilonment. Plantings "ho.rld
aesist users in orienting
l-tL"*s"ltu, on thu site anJ L""p th"*.e "om{ortatlu "r po"ritl" d*i"g the hot sumrtrer *oo*,r.

Atkactive ,ri"*s shoJJ t. "tun""d anJ Jetrirnenbl views rh"JJ t. ,or""r*tr.

I All *ot rhull .on{o* *ith the City "{ 6ls<rrn s .pph"ubl" cod"s, i''cl.rrJi',g, but not h-tit"J to, the City o{ Ibl*o* LanJecapi,,d G.rid*liour *rrJ Tuu Preeewation Ordio.n"u.

I Ttor" plauta *hich horru not performeJ wall previoualy in Broadstone, pnrtlc.,la"lyAlJ", u'J R.J Oah, rhull b" useJ ndnimJly, d"t Jl.

I Native O"kr shull te retrineJ throughout tLe project *h"rurr", porriLl". E"i"ting OuLr *k"L are to remain rLull b" protecteJ {ro* Ju*"gu. \ilithirr a circle two times the siz. "{ tLe canopy Ji"mutur, irrigation uystems rhull b" designed to rnini:rrize dr-ag" to fe"J"r roots .nd plant species .ill t" tolerant of lrury li*ituJ water after cstablisbaent.

I All lundr""pe areas rh"ll b" automatically trigateJ using vater e{f,cieut JiskiLution systems.

I T"*r rL"ll t" u *i-it r* o{ 15 g.llots i:e size, except *h"." ,t.,.Jler containers "u' tn or"J to rninirnize Jarnage to existinfl trees or promote befter rootingl h.bitr rtrtorrg native species.

I A rninimu'n "{ 50% o{ the totul quantity of rl,Js rhJl t. 5 gJlon rize.

I Gro,rnJco*"., u,'J Perrnnials rLoJJ b". ^inimom o{ 1 gullole in size. t Plant Paleft"s are i'r"luJ"d io th"r" Grr;J.lirr"r to proviJe consistency tkoughout tLe project Lut rr" not intenJeJ to prevent th" .JJiuoo o{ otL. epecies thut .,,uy "olurr", th" plulti',g concept.

Fbleom Corporatc Centcr Platrrecl D.*'"loptrtont Guidebneg Pagfe 26

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

TANDsCATT DTsrcN G"',."t.I
rufi\x/ Y rn9nT^tr AnD ARIAS ADJ^ITnT Tp 9AK W99DLAilD5:
t A 50 {oot lurrdr"up" easement .Lull b" pro.,ided along tLe I{ighway 50 &ontage. r Ao O"[ \fooJlu',J r]'ull b" ""tublirteJ ulong H;g!,my 50 to act u" u b,r#"r fo. th" Project. r Tt""r rhoJd t" "hrst"t"d to proviJe conttolluJ views o{ project bJJings. t Slo"h rh"Jd br ,-,".J aB necessary to ots"rrt" tlre view o{ th" ft."*uy ho^ putL;rrg ur"*, unJ t},e grounJ 0oot o{ th" boilJiog..
r Mo*.J or manicureJ trJ rltoJJ g"rr"tully not te ,r""J i'. thi" ur"u.

I 'llee Palette,
R"Jb"J (Cercis 'pp./ mJtitrunheJ
A{gL"r, Pine (P;nus
"ld"nto) Aluppo Pine (Pinus hoLpansis)
Stonu Pine (Pinus pinn)
Chin"se Pistuch" @i tto"lt; o chinensi s)
C"ldor',iu Syc"..rore (Platanus racemosa) *"ltit noL.J
Bl.'r Ort (Quercus Jouglasii) ro*" -.rlti-trunhed
Vull"y OaL (Quercus loLota)
CorL Ouh (Quercus suLn )
fnterior Lit e Ort (Qu"rcue wislizenii) *Jti-tottt"J
r Sl-''',-b Palefte:

Struo'6"oy Tu:ee (Arbutus Epp.)
Manzanita (Arctostaphyllou tpp.)
C"li{ornir Ltla" (Cnonothuu spp.)
Purn.y Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster lactuus)
Sil.'urbr.ry (Elnog r, " pungens " Fruitlandi ")
Molate frr",r" (Festuca rubra "Molate")
'Ioyot (IIetero meles atbutifoha) ' furo*eJ Orrrumenbl Gr"sses (MiscantLus sinensis, Muhlnnbn g;o rigens, Pennisetum sPP', )
,i,r'r. ..i.t ' . ".lrli a. "i,,.'t
' Rfi ,,fl P, gnfliii RAAD : fR9fffAfiti if
. rr#'.t-:i1*liupi,B;'::i:t.i{ii ,..: . i .; ,. ri' tl,.,i;,,.t'i{itr I A 30 foot LunJs."pu Easement rL"ll t" ,nairtained ulong the Lontag" o{ Ito:r Point RoaJ.

I A peJestri"n puthg/uy ,l,.ll o."r-r ^long the entire length o{ Itoo Point RoaJ. TLe pathway ,hull *"ut Jer except in areas of reskicteJ *iJth *l,ut" existiag boJJ". rip-rap is installeJ. fte puth*uy in constricteJ areas rLull b" "Jjacent to tLe tu"L o{ "r'rb. r Street tr""s sh.ll t" ...rJorJy "lrrst.r"J in a quantity at least "q,rul to one free per 35 [e"t o[
linear Lontage (excluding Jriveways). At"u, *h"r* to"L ,ip-*p constricts the &ontrg" u."" ate exempt &o- tLis reqrdrernent. Street trees wi-ll t" lo"ut"d at least 5'&om the street cu-rt uttd tL" meanJering ,iJ"*"IL. Street trees *ill b" pl"nted a rnaxirmrm "[ 10 {e"t Lo* th" street curt or th* bu"h "f rid"*.Ik, as appropriate.

Folsotrt Corporatc Center PlatoroJ Devclopment GtriJciinex l'.rsi* 30

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
rAnDsCAPr Drsicll G"t "t"1
Rqll PgfiT ngAD rn9HT [E (C$lTnWD)i
I T[re street trees along Iron Point Roud sl,ull ,-,ot incl.'J" Vhit. NJ., (A]nr" ,ho^b;t'ol;/, -hi.L u." plrnteJ ortth* otLe. siJe of the street, due lo ,"u"r" bor", iJeshtions o{ tkt species in tLe past 5 ye"rs.
t Tlr" p.i*ary grounJ-plane planting rhuil bu ruJ, *ki"L *ill ,rr""t Jur witL tltu q'"Ib. r Sl-tJ urrJ g-rroJ"overpluntings sh"JJ [r h"pt ,irrrpl. in orJ*, to emphasize project entries' TL"s. .r*u, ,hoJJ occur primatily b"huJ tlr. *"utJ"ring wall. t Prthiog "t"r" ,L"11 L" ,"r""o.d Ly plant materjal o. l"oJ{ot- to a minirnum h"ight o{ 30 inches at plant maturity nrrl"r, such screening oLscures rdribiliry at intersections.

I Tree PJl"*e;
A{ghrrr P;ne (P;nu" Jl"n"")
Ai"ppo Pine (P;nus holnpnntis)
Stoo" Pine (P;nus pinea)
l,ooJo,' Planeftee (Pl atan rs a"nit'oli a " Bl ooJgoo J " ) Bt r O*L (Quercus macrocarpa)
Cotb Ou[ (Qunrcus
"ubn )
r Sl*t.b .,,J G.orr',Jcov"t Pall"tte,
Mauzanita (Arctostaphyllot "pp.) CuJifo"tti" IAac (Cnanoiltus spp.) Prostrate Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster Jomnri "Lowfast")
Compact Esculloni^ (E""ollonio x- "T"o;")
/uniper {uniperue spp.)
C"ff""b"ttry (Rhro^ru"
"alit'ornica
" Evn Case")
D*"i{ IrrJiurr HawtLorn (Rl,"plt;okp;u i,Ji"o "Bolleina") Evergreen Current @;Lns riburn;fJ;u^)
Prosfrate Rosem"ry (Rosmarinus officinoli" tpp.) A".p tlue varieties Compact Laurustinus (ViLu*u^ tinus "spring Bouquet")
'. : - .: 1 .. .-'+: : .ii, j ' --1 i; i-it.'1"- :

DfiIVfWAY [TltRStCTl9NSil,
, '|:

I Piantings adjacent to the Jriveways at Iron Point RoaJ .ho"ld maxirnize ,""ro.rul "olo. .rr.J use a variety o{ "olo., orrJ t"*htr", to Jraw attention to lhe iltersection.

I Fortrr.l "rruo61"rrr".rts
o{ plantirrg, ,lroJJ t" cot riJ"r"J to itt"t""r. tLe conhast wilh tlt" sLreetscape plantings.

I All ittersuctio* rhoJJ not l,e plunted in tLu ,"me manner in otJer to assist users il orientation.

I Mature plantings rhoJJ.,."lr", obr"l,re vistility {o, Jtirr"rr. r;;i;;;;, cf"o,;;;i;' Li;.,,r.; d;;;ila'i5".*li'p,'*,ii.'d.,1,1oh,.". Fagc 3l

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

TANDsCAFT DrsiCN
I
t
G"rr,*ttl
Dflrvr\i/nY fiIrRsfCTigns GqnTnLED)
Tree Palefte;
Cr"p" My*le (Lagerstroemia x.) Inditn ttt* hytuJt
Flow"r,ing Pear (Pynrs
"ollnryono
uaieties)
A{gl'uo Pi.,e (Pi,ru" JJ"n"")
Al"ppo Pine (Pinus italeqensis)
Ston" Pine (Pinus pinea)
Corst Redw ool (Seqou;a sempervirens) bt"tgton',J as space "llo.t Shrob, u.rJ Gro,r',J"overs, Pl.ots f,om the Frontage Palette th""ld L" tr"J b proviJe visual contimrity with tle intersectious uoJ tlr. streetscape. Accent plantings are to te "kosulr ut th"
designer's Jiscretion.
l.iiili i{!#ifJffi F.itffi Fsnfi ,-
j -
r :''i i,
":r: F ; ;T
h", nftfiflAl$.;9fK(fs5 : R9ADSil'i
:e;ti1Jg**,il!i!5rfr{!:risti:!9ttru:.r'.;.i. : :.' : ; i' "ii itr i,:

I Accees roads *it+rin the vrtious sites comeet tLu parting areas "reJ u"tttkL u *ajor or}arizing elernent widdn the project. Th, l"oJr.rpe treatment tho"iJ "nh.rrc" this organiz"tion by
emplasizing +]r"r" ro.J..

I D.iu**.y. conne"ting to pa*iog ur"u, ,hoJJ L" rtophasiz"J o'itk accent plantings, but to a lesser extent tL-., t]r" J.i.,t*uy intersections at fron Point RoaJ.

I Mahrre pl'ntings rbo..rlJ ,r.u", olr..rt" "istility {ot J.i'o"tt.

I Tiur Palettu,
Strawb.try Tree (Arbutu" untdo)
R"Jt"d (Cerci s "pp./'".rltit..','}"d Ctup" M>*1" (Lagerstroemia x.) Inlianttibu ltybtiJt IJip Ti,". (LiioJn dn o" tul;t'p;f'ro)
Stone Ptne (Pinus pinea)
Flowering Peur (Py*"
"ollnryoro
'Aistocrat")
I Shrul .rrJ G.on rJcover Palette:
tJy o{ the Nil" (Agapantlrus oinntalis)
Et r"t"lJ Caryet Manzanita (Arctostaphyllo, *, "E*n oll Carput") Proskate Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster Ja^ mei " Lowt'ast" ) Ibttt'ight Lty (Di"tes uegeta)
D*.J lrrJao Harthom (Rhoph;olnpis indica "Bollnino")
. Prostrate Rosemary (Ros mainus olfi"i noli " t pp.) l""p tlue varieties Star Jasnin . (lro"l,Jo t pennum ia s nt i no i Jes )
lirJ CIt'{ !"p" Gll Ferc.'e bl"'.dr)
r;r;;';C;#"j;i;'C".;'pi;;i'n;u"lop**it'G.,iJ"ll,,"r 'i- -: ' -i:r:rirrilr:-'' p:;. a2

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

LNNDsCAPT DT5IGN
I
G"n".tl
P ruiinc 19T5,
G"*, ,l'"11 te interspets"d tko.rgLout tlre parLing areas tu s]ruJ" at least 4A% oftte p"tittg ureu, i',cluding access ,oodu, u[t., 15 years o{ growth.

Two J;tin"tive types o{ planting *ill o"".,, witLin t}re project p"rLiog lotu consisting o{ "native" areas "rJ ro ord"r"d planting o{ ,rror" exotic species. Plunts il "native" "."u" .}roJd apgear to be i.rJigeoous to tt. uret.

T1r" borrrrJury between the fuo planting "o.,", ,lroJd *"urrJ", tioougl, each projeet site, witL the ,r.on-r:ative planfings connecting b &ontage uttJ br:LilJ;trg u."u, orrd tl:e native plantings connecting to the HigLwoy 50 corriJo..rrJ ouL *oodltt.J plantings.

TLe propo.tion of one type o{ planting in relation to the otlr", uLoJd u"ry f,o* site to site as appropriate. 6, "*"rople, a site imrnediately aljacent to an oah *ooJi"''J rnight Lur.e 80% o{ tlr" prrtag area Jevot"J to ,.ro.. native plantings, while a site {urther east n:riglrt hut u *.t"h higL.r percentagfe of non-native plantings.

Spacings tetween plants rltoJJ b" *o." ,"rrdo* rn the "native" zone.

VL"." p.ttirrg "r"u Jivid", planters rr" p"rpurrJicJar to signilcant peJ"skiun trtffic, furf grass sLoJd t" "oosiJ.t"J tr th" non-native "r""u .rrd',rt -*o**J Molate F"r"ne i' tLe native areas.
"Nrtive" TL"" Pul"ft",
Sttu*L".ry Tree ('ArLutr" un JQ ro*u -Jti*t "o[.J E*op."o I{ackt"rry (Celtis au"tr"l;") fuJt'J (&rcis spp.) rmld-*.-["J
A{gL." Pirc (Pinus ella;ca)
Al"ppo Ptne @inus halnpnn"i")
Sto.l" Pine (Pirru" pinea)
Chio"r" Pistacke (Pistocltio Jinensis)
I-oJo', Planetree (Platunus oen ifolia "Bloodgool") *ost *Jti-trool"J Coast Live Oak (Quereus ag;foli") ro*, *,Jti-tru,'treJ
Bl.r" OuL (Quercus douglo"i;) ro*. -Ju-hot"d
Holly Oa[ (Qunrcus ilex)
V"lluy OuL (Qrnr"us loLota)
Bt* Ouh (Quetu" macrocarpa)
C".l ouh (Qun "u" suLer)
"Native" StJ uoJ Gto*Jcov.r Palette:

E*".'lJ Carpet Manzanita (Arctostaphyllo" x. "E*erold C",pnt") McMi''u Marreanita (,4rcto"uphyllou 1. "Ho*orl M"M;"u") D*.J Coyote Brrr"h (Baccharis pil"lori")
Crli{o*i" LJ.u" (Ceanotltu" "pp.) lower speeies or varieties Vhit" Roch.os" (Gstus hyb;d"t)
Molab F.u",r" (Festuea ruLra "Molatu")
A"sodeJ Ornamental Gruru", (Miscanthus sinensis, MuhlnnLn gia rigens, Pennisetum urr', )
,/
t
I
I
I
r
r
I
Ii.rl"or,t Corporate Ccntcr Plotlrtud Deuelopm"t t Guidclin.s Pat'e 33

05/10/2022 Item No.19.

TANDsCAPT DrsiCN G r'.:"rll r:;r I
I
I
PAlritilifi .,''.'j t9f5
Non-Native fiee Paiette,
Ctape My*l e (Lagerstroenia x.)IttJi"o ttibe kyb;Js
l,ondon Planetree (Platanus o"e;folio " BlooJgrod" ) utuoJ.tJ Flowering Pe.r. (Pgrus
"olLryono
'Aisto*..t")
Chitese EL* (Il-u' po-;t'ol;o "DraLn")
Sa-J"u{ Z"lhol. (ZnlLor" s errata)
Non-Native ShJ ".rd GtourrJcover klett.r
Rostrate Cotoneaster (Cotonenster dam mni " Loufa st" ) frrtoight Ltly (D;ntns uegeta)
Jurriper funiperus spp.]
Dwat{ Irrdiuo H"*thot,. (Rh"ptr iolapis indioa "Ballerino") Prostrate Rosernary (Roemarinus of/;";nolis spp) A.ep bl.re varieties Star Jasrnin u (Eo"h"lorptrmum iasminoiles)
T"J ffi*f-Epe'Lll Fu'""" bl""Jr)
: DeciJuous trees rnay bu or"J to eh.d" tl" ,o.rtL and w"st siJ*, oI tlr" bodJittgt *h"t" tl"y *ill not oLstruct signi{icant u.ckb.trrJ Leafures.

I Ji""r rhoJJ Le loo.t"J to avoid contact witl b*ilJitps at maturity. . UUlity ur"u, .lroJJ b" ,"r"un"J f,om view but pl"ntingt tLo"ld not obstruct access to utility areas.

I Irrigation rh"Jd L" "oJig*"d to
"'*'oiJ sprayinf wirtJows.
r Tlree Palette:

Mupl" (Acer spp.)
Stru*b..ry Tree (ArLut"t urnlo)
C..p" My.tl e (Lagerstroemia x.) Ittdiutt tti!" kyl;d.

Ti,lip T'"u (Liiodend",o" tul;t'pdn ") A{ghuo Pine (P;nus eld"ica) Flowedng P"ar @y*r rollnryono'Ari stouat" )
Coast ReJwo oJ (Seqouia semperuirens)
F"lro- C""porate Ceirtui Pln"."ed D"uclop-ent Grriclelincs Pogt 34

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
[AnDSCAPr DrsiCN G"rr"t"l
Bt&DFt6 ARrA5
r Sh.tb "nJ Gro,rtJcover Palefte:

Lily o{ the Nii. (Asapanthus oientalis)
E*.r"lJ Carpet Manzanita ('4r"tostaplzylloe *. "EmnrolJ Corpnt") McMinn Manzanita (Arctostaphgllos J. "Howard McMnr")
Prostrate Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster dam m ei " Lowt'as t ") Ibrtttight LJy (D;utu" uegeta)
Prostrate /uniper (uniperus c. "San Jose) ot sitnilu" varieties Deer Grass (M"hlenL"rgia rigens)
Huu.'"Jy Bnmloo Q{anJina domestica)
D*ut[ I:ediaIe Huwttroro (R]r"plr;"lnp; " i ndi ca " Ballei na") Evergreen Current (RiLe" uiLu-;f.l;"*)
Rostrate Rosemary (Rosmarinus o{/icinal;s spp.) d,."p tlue vrri"ties Star Jasmin " (Eo"lrnlo t perrnum ia s mi noi Jes)
Cornpact Laumstinus (Vibutnu^ tinus "Sping Bouquet")
Drurf Perivinf,le (V'ir* minor) rh"J" oJy
AssorteJ Ornamental Grurs"s {MiscantLus sinensis, Mulrlenburgia rigens, Pennisetum spp.,)
T"J fli*f-T"e Thll Rscu" Ll""J')
::. . -. . -. .:_. .'.:,' rtol".,,ii'dofo,ot" c*,.r""iji"#il=m*;til;:;ii'diia;[**-:'o:sE:'*!'dr': I);r9.,' 35

05/10/2022 Item No.19.
h
Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to Adopt Resolution No. 10831 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving an Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for Construction of the 75-unit Bidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project, and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On May 6,2020, the Planning Commission approved the Bidwell Place Mixed-Use project.

The Bidwell Place project is a 75-unit 100 percent affordable multifamily, mixed use housing project on the 3.24-acre Bank of America site located on East Bidwell Street between Rumsey Way and Market Street. The development, which is currently under construction, includes studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom floor plans and will serve a mix of extremely low, very-low- and low-income households.

I
MEETING DATE: 51r012022
AGENDA SECTION: Old Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10831 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving an Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for Construction of the 75-unit Bidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project, and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Community Development Department

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

The project is being financed by Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits and tax-exempt Private Activity Bonds and all the approved project underwriting were based on a standalone asset that would be regulated as affordable housing for 55 years. As a result, the project site must be parcelizedto separate the affordable housing community asset from the commercial retail property (Bank of America). At time of project approval, staff and the applicant were under the impression that separation of the Bank of America commercial use from the residential portion of the proposed project would be achieved by a simple lot line adjustment. However, through further surveying and title search it was discovered that, although there are two Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) associated with the site, these parcels only exist for assessment purposes and have not been mapped. As a result, the applicant is in the process of requesting Planning Commission approval for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the existing 3.24-acre property into two individual parcels. The two newly created parcels will consist of a 1.1l-acre parcel (403 East Bidwell Street) and a 2.07-acre parcel (425 East Bidwell Street) within the East Bidwell Mixed Use Overlay of the General Commercial zone of the City of Folsom.

In accordance with the Folsom Municipal Code, Section 16.32 040, the project is now subject to parkland dedication in-lieu fees (Quimby) as part of this subsequent Tentative Parcel Map approval request. Because this fee was not previously anticipated, the additional fees place a financial burden on the project which the affordable housing project cannot absorb. As such, City Council is being asked to approve a supplemental housing loan to the applicant in the exact amount of the levied Quimby parkland dedication in-lieu fees to offset this financial burden on the project. This loan will go directly towards the payment of the Quimby fee and will not provide any additional financial benefit to the project.

POLICY / RULE
Government Code section 66477, commonly referred to as the Quimby Act, establishes the statutory authority by which a local government may require the dedication of land or the payment of fees for park pu{poses (Govemment Code $66a77@).). In conformance with section 66477, the City of Folsom has adopted a parkland dedication ordinance, which allows the City to impose park dedication and/or fee payment obligations in conjunction with the consideration and approval of a tentativs map or parcel map.

This loan requires City Council approval.

ANALYSIS
The Bidwell Place project is being financed with 4 percent non-competitive tax credits, taxexempt bonds, developer equity, and a $4.15 million affordable housing loan from the City.

In addition, the project received a $150,693 .75 grant (Resolution No. 10630) from City to offset the loss of 60 sewer fee credits that had previously been approved for the project.

The project was financed in202l with a forward locked permanent debt rate. All sources and uses of financing were locked atthat milestone. At the time of construction loan closing, the California Construction Cost Index (CCCI) was7l02. The CCCI, as of March of 2022, is 8736, 2

05/10/2022 Item No.20.
which represents a23 percentincrease from the previous year. And, although most of Bidwell Place's construction contracts were executed at the construction loan closing, several remaining trades experienced significant cost increases and those increased costs have been passed onto the project. In addition, it is important to note that as a 100 percent affordable housing project, all rental income is capped by federal and state agencies and cannot be increased to generate additional income for the project. For these reasons, the project cannot absorb the additional costs associated with the previously unanticipated Quimby fees.

Financial support of this affordable housing project is consistent with the City's Housing Element Goal of facilitating affordable housing. Based on City Council's previous commitment to award financial assistance to this project, staff is supportive of the developer's request for a $588,265.55 supplemental affordable housing loan to offset the Quimby fees.

Loan Terms
A term sheet outlining the conditions of the loan has been prepared and is included in the staff report (Attachment 2). Key specifics of this term sheet include:

1. Loan amount of $588,265.55

2. 3% simple interest

3. 50-year repayment term

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funding for the requested affordable housing loan for this project is available from the City's Housing Fund (Fund 238). An appropriation will be required in the amount of $588,265.55.

There are sufficient funds available for this additional appropriation. This funding source does not impact the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Bidwell Place project was determined by the Planning Commission on May 6, 2020 tobe categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code Sections 21 159 .2I and 21159 .23 as further described in Sections 15192 and 5194 (Affordable Housing Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10831 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving an Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for Construction of the 75-unit Bidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project, and Appropriation of Funds

2. Supplemental Subordinate Loan Term Sheet
a
J

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

3. Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit
Submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
4

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 10831 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving an Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for Construction of the 7l-unitBidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project, and Appropriation of Funds

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

RESOLUTION NO. 10831

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'FOLSOM APPROVING A LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $588,265.55 TO BIDWELL PLACE, LP FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 75.T]I{IT BIDWELL PLACE AFFORDABLE

MULTIFAMILY PROJECTO AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission approved the Bidwell Place Mixed-Use project which is currently under construction and will serve a mix of extremely low, very-low- and low-income households.; and
WHEREAS, the project is financed by Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits, tax-exempt Private Activity Bonds and an affordable housing loan and grant from the City; and WHEREAS, all the project was financed as a stand-alone affordable housing community; and
WHEREAS' for regulatory consistency, the project site must be parcelized to separate the affordable housing community from the commercial retail property; and WHEREAS, at the time of project approval, staff and the applicant were under the impression that separation of the residential use from the commercial portion of the proposed project would be achieved by a lot line adjustment; and WHEREAS, through firther surveying and title search, it was discovered that although there are two Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) associated with the site, the parcels only exist for assessment purposes and are not mapped; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is in the process of requesting Planning Commission approval for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the existing 3.24-acre property into two individual parcels; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Folsom Municipal Code, Section 16.32.040, the project will be subject to parkland dedication in-lieu fees (Quimby) as part of the subsequent Tentative Parcel Map approval request; and
WHEREAS' to off-set the additional cost to the project associated with the previously unanticipated Quimby parkland dedication /parkland in lieu fee, the developer is requesting an affordable housing loan from the City to assist with the construction of the Bidwell Place project; and
WHEREAS, providing financial assistance to affordable housing projects is consistent with the Goal H-3: Facilitating Affordable Housing in the City's Housing Element; and WHEREAS' the requested loan amount of $588,265.55 is appropriate as it represents the Resolution No. 10831
Page I of2 Page 2242
05/10/2022 Item No.20.
monetary value of the unanticipated Quimby parkland dedication / parkland in lieu fee that Bidwell Place is subject to as part of the Tentative Parcel Map request; and WHEREAS, funding for the requested affordable housing loan is available from the City's Housing Fund (Fund 238).

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby approves an affordable housing loan in the amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for construction of the 75-unit Bidwell Place affordable multifamily project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is directed to appropriate $588,265.55 from the City's Housing Fund (Fund 238) for purpose of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10ft day of May 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Kerri Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10831
Page2 of2 Page 2243
05/10/2022 Item No.20.

ATTACHMENT 2
Supplemental Subordinate Loan Term Sheet

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

Supplemental Subordinate Loan Term Sheet
Bidwell Place Apartments
City of Folsom
April25,2O22
L. Lender: City of Folsom, a municipal corporation

2. Borrower: Bidwell Place, LP, a California limited partnership i. General Partners
L St. Anton Bidwell Place, LLC (Co-GP)

2. PacH Anton South Holdings, LLC (Managing GP) (Parent Company: Pacific Housing, tnc.)

3. Bank of America, N.A. - Tax Credit lnvestor

3. Loan Amount: 5588,265.55

4. Purpose: Construction of the 75-unit Bidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project

5. Timing of Funding: The City's loan will be funded in conjunction with when the Quimby Park Fee is due and payable.

5. lnterest Rate: 3%per annum - simple
7 . Annual Pavments: Repayment of the principal amount of the loan together with accrued interest will be in a single balloon payment at loan maturity.

8. Term: 50 years.

9. Balloon Pavment: At the expiration of the loan term, tOO% of the principal balance of the loan and all accrued interest will be due.

10. Refinancing: ln the event of refinancing, the City will subordinate to the new senior loan on substantially similar terms as the original financing.

11. Securitv: City's loan will be secured by a deed of trust junior to construction and permanent financing sources set forth.

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

ATTACHMENT 3
Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

FOLSOM

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP

BIDWELL PLACE
APN 071-0190-060 & 061
403 &425 EAST BIDWELL STREET, FOLSOM, CALFORNIA

LOTTING PLAN
,iEFiillPx',

CITFFT TNDFY

SRNET I
SIIEET2
SIIEET ]
nS.\TlVe MlPn-OTn"-O Pl-\N
TENTAUVE M.{-ORADINC PLA}*
'f tYf a.\TrvE MrP-UllL[Y ruN
'
jrii.r.

FOR PARCEL
LgAAI|AUriAg
it
P RCEI-I =48.149SF. PARCIL 2 :9{.l23s.lj
nldtwAY DEDICATT0N I 3,016S.F.

ToT L ir{1,508S.I.
\.

I
EXtST.

BUILDING
6i,
(BANK)
J
U
o
E.

I
!5
as
T
!
iiisis
)il
p' ,^
$/g
eld f.3
!/{
I
.r-*$.
-"dc
,
lq" IIE
EN(ilNEERtNc ND t'LAt{NtNc
PROP,

BUILDING
PROP.

BUILDING
. l-s:l
TIN
J
U
o
E
o
*), LOT
,,,,
PROP.

PROP.

BUILDING
Bb"-," '.&*
-' l"." r,'r'"*^^^-..*r.*,
ri! r !{rr^roiD lLrll, ro
*.r$.ttltL.r \i:d,r lrrti'i,rl
t
I
F
I
3 d
;l
7 7
2 t
r

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

This page is intentionally left blank.

05/10/2022 Item No.20.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 511012022
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 1326 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving the Folsom Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy in compliance with Assembly Bill481 (Introduction and First Reading)
FROM: Police Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached military equipment use policy by introducing and conducting the first reading of Ordinance No. 1326 -AnUncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving the Folsom Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy in accordance with Assembly Bill481.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, relating to the use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies.

Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481 or the Bill), codified at Government Code sections 7070 through7075, requires a law enforcement agency (LEA) to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, via adoption of an ordinance approving a "military equipment" use policy, prior to the LEA, acquiring, using, or seeking funds for military equipment. AB 481 defines "military equipment" broadly and creates explicit parameters for the military equipment use policy it requires.

The Folsom Police Department (FPD) seeks City Council adoption of the attached ordinance approving the Military Equipment Use Policy - FPD Policy 707 (Exhibit A), in order to allow FPD to continue to use the vital equipment specified therein, as well as acquire one piece of new equipment.
1

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

POLICY / RULE
Assembly Bill481 requires the following in summary:

Law enforcement agencies must obtain approval from their governing body, by ordinance adopting a military equipment use policy, before engaging in specific actions related to the use or acquisition of military style equipment, including equipment that was acquired before January 1,2022, when AB 481 went into effect.
a
a The proposed military equipment use policy must be available on the law enforcement agency's public website at least 30 days before the public meeting concerning the ordinance and the policy. If approved, the policy must remain publicly available on the website for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

The proposed ordinance and military equipment use policy must be considered as an agenda item in open session at aregular meeting of the goveming body, with the opportunity for public comment in accordance with the Brown Act.

The governing body of a law enforcement agency shall only approve the military equipment use policy if it makes the specified determinations found in Government Code section 7071(dxl). These findings are discussed in detail below.

The governing body must review the ordinance and vote on whether to renew it at least annually. In deciding whether to renew the ordinance, the governing body must make specific determinations as described in Government Code section 707I(e)(2).

The law enforcement agency must submit an annual report on military equipment funding, acquisition, and use to the goveming body. The report must comply with the requirements of Government Code section 7072. The governing body must rely on the report in deciding whether to renew the ordinance and in making the specific determinations described in Government Code sectionT0Tl(e)(2). The annual report must be publicly available on the website for as long as the military equipment is available for use.
a
a
a
a
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the law enforcement agency must hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency's funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

ANALYSIS
The legislative intent with Assembly Bill481 was to have each jurisdiction's governing body be aware of and approve the use or acquisition of certain'military' equipment described in California Government Code section 7 07 0.
a
2

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

AB 4gl defines ,,military equipmenf'broadly to include 15 categories of equipment. The term .,military equipment", as use-cl in AB 481, in fact does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military. pursuant to AB 481, items deemed to be "military equipment" include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles (drones), armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, pepper balls, less lethal shotguns, less lethal 40mm projectile launchers, long range acoustic devices, and flashbangs.
other items deemed to be "military equipment" via AB 481 include foundational equipment such as rifles.

The Folsom police Department acquired and used "military equipment", as defined in AB 481, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations before January 1,2022, when the new rules went into effect. State law now requires that the Department seek City Council approval, by an ordinance adopting a military equipment use policy, before it can use existing military equipment, acquire new military equipment, or collaborate with another law enforcement agency in the deployment of military equipment within the City of Folsom. The Department may continue to ,rr" ^y "military equipment^" acquired before January 1,2022, as long as it begins the approval p.or"r, by May 1, iOiZ, and the
-Council
adopts the ordinance approving the military equipment
use policy within 180 days.

AB 4gl contains specific requirements for the military equipment use policy itself. These include:
a description of each type of military equipment, its capabilities, expected lifespan, product description from the -ur,,rfrrt*"r, und the quantity of each type of equipment; the purposes and authorized uses for each type of equipment; the fiscal impact; the rules that govern each authorized use; the training required before the equipment may be used by Department personnel; the mechanisms to ensurl compliance with the policy; and the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or ask questions about the equipment and its use. The attached poficy contains all of the required information for the Department's existing equipment and for the one piece of new equipment to be acquired in2022.

The proposed policy must be considered by the Council as an agenda item in open session at a ,"g.rL1. meeting in accordance with the Brown Act, with an opportumty for public comment. The CJuncil shall only approve the policy if it makes all of the following determinations pursuant to Government Code section 7 07 | (d)(l ):

A. The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

B. The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

C. If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to u',ruilubl" alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

J Page 2251
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

D. Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

All sworn offrcers with the Folsom Police Department are bound by a stringent set of laws, policies, and procedures which are in line with the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. Similarly, all officers are trained in a variety of strategies and tactics which are in line with the laws, policies, and procedures in which we are bound, prior to the use or application of any'military' equipment.

Items deemed to be "military equipment" by AB 481 are used as a component of overall best practices for LEAs throughout the country. These tools have been tested in the field, and are used by LEAs to enhance citizen safety and officer safety. Loss of these items would jeopardize the welfare of citizens and peace officers within the City of Folsom. For example, the rifles deemed to be "military equipment" allow peace officers to address lethal threats from a greater distance and with greater precision.

The Folsom Police Department is committed to using the most up to date tools and equipment to safeguard the citizens of Folsom. Many items deemed to be "military equipment" by AB 481 are in fact employed by the Folsom Police Department, and LEA's across the country, in order to specifically reduce risk to community members. These items provide peace officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations which otherwise might rise to the level of a lethal force encounter. To that end, the items at issue in this report, and accompanying Military Equipment Use Policy, also provide FPD's peace officers with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its stringent use of force policy.

AB 481 also includes a focus on transparency and public engagement. To that end, the proposed policy must be posted on the Department's website at least 30 days before the public hearing on the ordinance. If approved, the policy must be publicly available on the website for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

Similarly, AB 481 stated, 'The public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment by state or local government officials, as well as a right to participate in any government agency's decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment.' As such, the Police Department hosted a publicized community event on3l3ll2022 at the Folsom Police Department, to display and discuss the items applicable to this new law. The feedback of the event from the over 25 attendees was favorable, and the attendees supported the use of the equipment in order to keep the community safe.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or to activities that are not otherwise considered a "project" as defined by Public Resources Code $ 21065. 4 Page 2252
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
(CEQA Guidelines g 15061(c)(3) and $ 15373.) The Council's decision regarding the military equipient use policy meets tire above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No environmental review is required.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no direct financial impact caused by adoption of the ordinance or approval of the policy.

The initial and ongoing financial impacts associated with each Type of existing Military Equipment are detailed in the policy. The financial impact of any new acquisition of Military Equipment approved by the Council through the policy is stated in the policy and will also be described in the contract and any staff report associated with acquisition of the specific piece of equipment.

ATTACHMENT
Ordinance No. 1326 - An Uncodified Ordinance approving the Folsom Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy in accordance with Assembly Bill 481 Submitted,
Richard Hillman, Chief of Police
5 Page 2253
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

ORDINANCE NO. 1326

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF F'OLSOM APPROVING THE

FOLSOM POLICE DEPARTMENTOS MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY IN COMPLIAIICE WITH AB 481
The City Council of the City of Folsom does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this ordinance is to authorize the Folsom Police Department's acquisition and use of Military Equipment through approval of the attached Military Equipment Use Policy in accordance with AB 481 (Government Code sections 7070 through7072.) SECTION 2 POLICY
The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A.

SECTION 3 F'INDINGS
A. On September 30,2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, relating to the use of "military equipment" by law enforcement agencies.

B. Assembly Bill48l, codified at Government Code sections7070 through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, by an ordinance adopting a "military equipment" use policy, at aregular meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws, before taking certain actions related to the funding, acquisition, or use of o'military equipment".

C. The term "military equipmenf is defined in Government Code section 7070.

D. Assembly Bill481 allows a law enforcement agency's governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of "military equipment" within its jurisdiction only if it makes specified determinations.

E. Once approved, the Folsom Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy will be contained in the Folsom Police Department's Policy Manual and identified as Policy 707- CiIy Council Military Equipment Approval.

F. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy was published on the Folsom Police Department's public website on March 25 2022.

G. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy was presented to City Council on May 10, 2022.

Ordinance No. 1326
Page I of59 Page 2254
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

H. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy meets the requirements of Government Code section 7 07 0, subdivision (d).

SECTION 4 DETERMINATIONS
Based on the information presented to the City Council at the public meeting on May 10, 20y2,and the findings above, the City Council makes the following determinations:
l. The Military Equipment identified in the proposed Military Equipment Use Policy, attached heieto as Exhibit A, is necessary because there are no reasonable altematives that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safety.

2. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

3. The piece of Military Equipment proposed to be purchased this year is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safetY.

4. prior Military Equipment use complied with applicable policies- The Folsom Police Department aia ttofhuue a Military Equipment Use Policy in effect before the date of this ordinance, but the other applicable policies were followed.

5. The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is approved and adopted.

SECTION5 NO TORY DUTY OF'CARE
This Ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the City or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care toward persons or property within or without the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed bY law.

SECTION 6 SEYERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance or the attached policy or *y part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by an' court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portionr of thir Ordinance or the attached policy or any part thereof. The City Council declares that it would have passed each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, senten"", Cla,x", or phrase be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Ordinance No. 1326
Page2 of59 Page 2255
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

SECTION 7 EFF'ECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its passage and adoption, provided it is published in fulI or in summary within twenty (20) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation in the City.

This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 10, 2022 and the second reading occurred at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 24,2022.

On a motion by Council Member
-secondedby
Council Member-,
the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Folsom, State of California, this 24thday of May 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Policy
707

EXHIBIT A
Folsom Police Department
Folsom PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
707.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code S 7070; Government Code S 7071; Government Code S 7072).
707.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code $ 7070):

Military equipment - lncludes but is not limited to the following:
1 Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. 2 Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. Police versions of standard consumer vehicles are not Military Equipment. 3 High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, fiveton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. Unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs)and motorized dirt bikes are not Military Equipment. 4 Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and use a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.
5 Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.
6 Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.

Z Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature.This does not include a handheld, one-person ram. ltems designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, are not Military Equipment.
8 Firearms and ammunition of.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
9 Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than.SO caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code$ 30510 and Penal Code $ 30515, with the exception of standard-issue handguns and ammunition of less than.50 caliber' 1O Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. 11 Flashbang grenades, noise-flash diversionary devices, and explosive breaching tools. 12 Tear gas, pepper balls, and other munitions containing tear gas or OG, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
13 TASER@ Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADS).

Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022103125, All Rights Reserved.

Published with psrmission by Folsom Police Department
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase 4 of59
tttcttDRAFTtc*t Military Equipment - 1

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Folsom Police DePartment
Folsom PD PolicY Manual
Military Equipment
j4 The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40 mm projectile launchers, bean bag, rubber bullet, specialty impact munition (SlM) weapons, and any kinetie energy weapons and munitions.
1S Any other equipment as determined by the City Council to require additional oversight' Type - Each item that shares the same manufacturer model number. 707.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Folsom police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code S 7071 with respect to military equipment' 707.9 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the City Council for matters related to the requirements of this PolicY.
(b) ldentifying equipment that qualifies as Military Equipment, as defined in this Policy, whethertie equipment is in the current possession of the Department or is equipment the Department intends to acquire'
(c) Conducting an inventory of all Military Equipment, as defined in this Policy, at least annuallY.
(d) Collaborating with any other law enforcement agency that may useJ\4ilitary Equipment within the juiisdiction of Folsom Police Department (Government Code S 7071). (e) preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting, including:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting'

2. preparing for public questions regarding the Department's funding, acquisition, or use of Military EquiPment.
(f) preparing the annual Military Equipment report Council and ensuring that the report is made ivailable on the department website consistent with this Policy. (Government Code g 7OT2). Additionally, updating the ordinance, policy, and Military List as necessary.
(g) Ensuring that this Policy is made available on the Department's website and that any newly proposed version of the Policy is also available on the website at least 30 days before any public hearing concerning the Policy or the associated ordinance. (h) Evaluating the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints o, "on""ri* or submit questions about the use of any Type of Military Equipment and updating those procedures as needed'
Copyright Lexipol, LLA 2O22tOAl25, All Rights Reserved' Published with parmission by Folsom Police Department
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase 5 of59
,.tcrcDRAFTt).tt Military Equipment - 2

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Folsom Police DePartment
Folsom PD PolicY Manual
Military Equipment
(i) Ensuring that the Department responds in a timely mannerto each complaint, concern, or question about Military Equipment
707.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
Attached is a list of the Folsom Police Department's qualifying Military Equipment, including the following information (Government Code $ 7070):
(a) A description of each Type of Military Equipment, including:

1. Quantity

2. Capabilities

3. Expected lifesPan

4. Product description from the manufacturer'
The purposes and authorized uses of each Type of Military Equipment The fiscal impact of each Type of Military Equipment, including:

1. lnitial cost of obtaining the equipment

2. Estimated annual cost of maintaining the equipment
Rules that govern each authorized use
Training that must be completed before any member of the Department is allowed to use each specific Type of Military Equipment
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
707.5 USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Military Equipment used by any member of this Department shall first be approved for use by the City Council. Once approved, Military Equipment must be used in accordance with all applicable Folsom police Department policies and used only by those members trained and authorized for such use.
707.6 ACQUISITION OF NEW MILITARY EQUIPMENT
(a) The acquisition of new Military Equipment shall be approved in advance by the City Council, in accordance with this Policy.
(b) The Department is authorized to acquire additional stock of approved Military Equipment from other law enforcement agencies in the event of an emergency when approved in advance by the Chief of Police or authorized designee. lf that occurs, the Department must obtain City Council approval as described in this Policy as soon as practicable.

Copyright
Published
Lexipol, LLC 2022103125, All Rights Reserued
with permission by Folsom Police Department
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase 6 of 59
tcrc,cDRAFTtttt Military Equipment - 3

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Folsom Police DePartment
Folsom PD PolicY Manual
Military Equipment
707.7 FUNDING FOR MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Funding for Military Equipment shall be approved in advance by the City Council, in accordance with the City of Folsom budget process, the procurement requirements of the Folsom Municipal Code, and this PolicY.
707.8 APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL
(a) The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the City Council for the acquisition and use of Military Equipment by way of an ordinance adopting the Military Equipment Use Policy. (Government code s 7071') (b) The City Council shall review the ordinance approving the Military Equipment Use policy annually and vote on whether to renew the ordinance. (Government Code $ 7071.)
(c) As part of the initial and annual approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall submit the proposed Military Equipment Use Policy to the City Gouncil and make it available on the Department's website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the Military Equipment at issue (Government Code S 7071). (d) The ordinance approving the Military Equipment Use Policy must be adopted by the City Council before the Department engages in any of the following (Government Code $ 7071):

1. Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC S 2576a'

2. Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.

3. Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.

4. Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. b. Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body'

6. Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment'

7. Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 707.9 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF POLICY
(a) The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall make any proposed Military Equipment Use Policy publicly available on the Department's website at least 30 days before any public hearing concerning the Military Equipment at issue. This includes any proposed changes to the Policy or the Military Equipment lnventory associated with the City Council's annual review of the ordinance. (Government Code $ 7071') Copyright Lexipol, ILC 2022103125, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Folsom Police Departmant
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase 7 of59
tttc*DRAFTtctttc Military Equipment - 4

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Folsom Police DePartment
Folsom PD PolicY Manual
Military Equipment
(b)
707.'IO COORDINATION WITH OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES Military Equipment used by any other law enforcement agency that is providing mutual aid to or operating in conjunction with this Department or the City of Folsom in a law enforcement capacity, shall comply with the law enforcement agency's own Military Equipment use policy. Use of another law enforcement agency's Military Equipment by that agency in the City of Folsom is approved as long as the use complies with the other agency's Military Equipment use policy' 707.11 ANNUAL REPORT
(a) Within one year after approval of the Military Equipment Use Policy, and annually thereafter, the Chief of pbtice or the authorized designee should submit to the City Council an annual Military Equipment report for each Type of approved Military Equipment. (Government Code S 7072)'
(b) The Chief of Potice or the authorized designee should make each annual Military Equipment report publicly available on the Department's website for as long as the tvtiiitary Equipment is available for use. (Government Code S 7072.) (c) The annual Military Equipment report shall include, at a minimum, all of the following information for the preceding calendar year for each Type of Military Equipment (Government Code S 7072):

1. A summary of how the Military Equipment was used and the purpose of its use.

Z. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the Military EquiPment.

3. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the Military Equipment Use Policy, and any actions taken in response'

4. The total annual cost for each Type of Military Equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the Military gq-uipnient in the calendar year following submission of the annual Military EquiPment rePort.

5.ThequantitypossessedforeachTypeofMilitaryEquipment'

6. lf the Department intends to acquire additional Military Equipment in the next year,thequantitysoughtforeachTypeofMilitaryEquipment.

The Chief of police or the authorized designee shall make any Military Equipment Use policy publicly available on the Department's website for as long as the Military Equipment is available for use' (Government Code S 7071') Copyright Lexipot, LLC 2022103125, All Rights Reserued.

Published with permission by Folsom Police Department
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase 8 of59
ttttcDRAFTtcttt Military Equipment - 5

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Folsom Police Department
Folsom PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
707.12 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING MILITARY EQUIPMENT
To maintain the quantity of each Type of Military Equipment included in the Military Equipment lnventory attached to this Policy, the Department is authorized to replace any approved Military Equipment without amending this Policy or the associated ordinance, if the Military Equipment is destroyed or rendered inoperable as a result of authorized use. 707.13 COMPLIANCE
Mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Military Equipment Use Policy include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) The Chief of Police shall be considered the ultimate authority for the content and adoption of the provisions of this Policy and shall ensure compliance with the Policy. (b) Each Division Commander will ensure that members under his/her command are aware of this Policy.
(c) Each member will be required to acknowledge that he/she reviewed the Policy and shall seek clarification from an appropriate supervisor as needed. (d) The Training Officer is responsible for developing, reviewing; updating, and maintaining the Department's training plan so that required training is completed. (e) The Military Equipment Coordinator is responsible for compliance with specific components of the Policy as described above.
(f) Violations of this Policy shall form the basis for departmental administrative action, training, or discipline consistent with the Policy Manual, the City of Folsom Personnel Rules and Regulations, and the applicable collective bargaining agreement. (g) This Policy shall not be construed to create a higher standard of care for civil or criminal liability against the City of Folsom or its employees.
707.14 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
(a) Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual Military Equipment report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the annual Military Equipment report and respond to public questions regarding the report and the Department's funding, acquisition, or use of Military Equipment. (Government Code s 7072.)
(b) Members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific Type of Military Equipment in any form, including in writing, by email sent to the following email address: [email protected], in person, by telephone at (916) 461-6400, at pre-determined community engagement meetings related to Military Equipment, or at any City Council meeting. Complaints related to the use of Military Equipment will be handled in accordance with FPD Policy 1019- Personnel ComPlaints.
(c) The Department will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner. The Military Equipment Coordinator is specifically tasked Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022103125, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Folsom Police Department
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase 9 of 59
,cLttDRAFTtttttt Military Equipment - 6

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Folsom Police DePartment
Folsom PD PolicY Manual
Military Equipment
with ensuring that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.

Copyright
Published
Ordinance No. 1326
Pase l0 of59
Lexipol, LLC 2022103125, All Rights Reserved.
with permission by Folsom Polico Dopartmont
*tc*DRAFTttct Military Equipment - 7

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

List of Folsom Police Department's Qualifying Military Equipment Ordinance No. 1326
Page l1 of59 Page 2264
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
maintenance & battery cost
approx
yeal
$30,000
$2,000
32-hr Basic Pilots Course or FAA Remote Pilot Certificate I Certificate of Authority issued by FAA - #2020-WSA-7949-COA, FAA Part and completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391 107
UAS devices need to be as software becomes obsolete vendors.

Commercial grade UAV equipped with a thermal imaging camera and a 30x zoomcamera. 38 mins. maximum flight time. Has live stream capabilites.Provide Aerial for L.E. sed SWAT Search and Rescue to locate
Investigative
Commercial UAS
I
Fly, Hover, broadcast video, record video, Photography, FLIR' carry pay

7.5lbs
load up to
Costs
Authority for Authorized Use
Life
Manufacturer's Description
Authorized Usage
DJI Matrice 210
Capability
32-hr Basic Pilots Course or t FAA Remote Pilot Certificate art l0 Commercial grade UAS equipped with UHD capable camera' Has live stream and 28 min. time.

Provide Aerial for L.E.

Used SWAT Search and Rescue to locateInvestigative
maintenance &
approx.
cost
$2,500
$300
Commercial UAS
I
FI Hover broadcast record video
devices need to be as software becomes obsolete vendors.

T
Manufacturer's Description
Authorized Usage
Costs
DJI Phantom 4 Pro
Life S
Ordinance No. 1326Page 12 of 59 Page 2265
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Certificate of Authority issued by FAA - #2020-WSA-7949-COA, FAA Part 107 holder and completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391 Authority for Authorized Use
Ordinance No. 1326

Provide Aerial for L.E.InvestigativeUsed by SWAT, Patrol, Search and Rescue to locate persons $3,600$400 anticipated yearly maintenance & battery cost approx.
32-hr Basic Pilots Course (or equivalent), FAA Remote Pilot Certificate (Part 107) Certificate of Authority issued by FAA - #2020-WSA-7949-COA, FAA Part 107 holder and completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391 Commercial UAS
J
Fly, Hover, broadcast video, record video, Photography, broadcast instant and/orprerecorded notifications.

UAS devices need to be as software becomes obsolete vendors.

Commercial grade UAS equipped with Single 4k colored camera with Zoomcapabilities. Has live stream ty and 30 min. flight time.

Authority for Authorized Use
Life SpanManufacturer's De scription
PurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
DJI Mavic 2
Description
Quantity
Capability
DJI Mavic 2 Zoom
Commercial UAS
1 Fly, Hover, broadcast video, record video, Photography.

UAS devices need to be upgraded as software becomes obsolete by vendors.

Commercial grade UAS equipped with Single 4k colored camera with Zoomcapabilities. Has live stream capability and 30 min. flieht time.Provide Aerial for L.E.

Description
Quantity
Capability
Life Span
Manufacturer's Description
Purpose

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
32-br Basic Pilots Course FAA Remote Pilot Certificate I or and completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391 FAA #2020-wsA 7949-COA, FAA Part I07 Certificate ofAuthority issued by Used SWAT Search and Rescue to locate
Investigative
$400 antici maintenance & $1,500 cost
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
Costs
#2020-WS A-7949-COA, FAA Part 107
holder and completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391 Certifi cate of AuthoritY issued by FAA - 32-hr Basic Pilots Course (or eq Remote Pilot Certificate (Part 107) uivalent), FAA Provide Aerial for L.E.

Used SWAT Search and Rescue to locateInvestigative
$80 maintenance & cost
$s00
UAS devices need to be as software becomes obsolete vendors.

Commerical grade UAS equipped with Single 4k colored camera. Has live stream and 30 min. time
Commercial UAS2
Fly, Hover, broadcast video, record video, Photo graphy, Interior fl ights Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
Costs
Life
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
se
Capability
DJI Mavic Mini 2
Descri
Commercial UAS
I
Fly, Hover, broadcast video, Photo graphy, Interior fl ights. record video, Descri
Capability
DJI Mavic Mini
Ordinance No. 1326Page 14 of59 Page 2267
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

UAS devices need to be upgraded as software becomes obsolete by vendorsCommerical grade UAS equipped with Single 4k colored camera. Has live stream capabilify and 30 min. fight time.

Provide Aerial Support for L.E. operations
InvestigativeUsed by SWAT, Patrol, Search and Rescue to locate $400
anticipated yearly maintenance & battery cost
approx. $80
32-hr Basic Pilots Course (or equivalent), FAA Remote Pilot Certificate (Part 107) Certificate of Authority issued by FAA - #2020-WSA-7949-COA, FAA Part 107 holder and completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391 Life Span
Manufacturer's DescriptionPurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
DJI Aeroscope (Regional Item)
Commercial UAS detection device
1 Drone detection and identification platform.UAS devices need to be upgraded as software becomes obsolete by vendors.

Drone detection platform that identifies UAV communication links, gathering information such as flieht status, paths, and other information in real-time.Identifu and track commercial drones within secured or restricted areasProvide airspace security over restricted areas or during specilized eventsUnknown - obtained through UASI grant applied for by regional partners approx. $400 anticipated yearly maintenance & battery cost In house departmental training. No POST requirement.

Completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391
Description
OuantityCapability
Life Span
Manufacturer's DescriptionPurposeAuthorized Usage
Costs
Required TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Commerical streaming box
I
Streams video in real-time HD video over a secure internet connection. 3-5 years
Blu-Link Streaming Box
Description
Quantity
Capability
Life Span
Page l5 of59 Page 2268
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Portable video streaming device to stream live HD video in real time over a secure Internet connection.

Provide real-time video over a secure internet connection for situational awareness and scene assessment.

Completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391$5,400
$50 antici
approx.
maintenance & cost
No POST uirement. In house
Completion of Department Training, Folsom Police Department Policy - Section 391
Avatar III
Robotex INC Avatar III Robot
I
track system of propulsion and The Avatar III Robot is a radio controlled robot on a is outfitted with Cameras, Speakers, and Microphones. The robot increases officers ability to conduct searches in high risk scenarios by providing video and audio into areas that may not be safe for officers to enter. In addition the cameras, speakers, and micorphones allow for 2 way communication between officers and subjectsduring critical incidents such as barricaded subjects, hostage situations, or suicidal subjects. The camera system provides additional safety for officers when placed in strategic positions to monitor doorways, hallways or access points. The Avatar III Robot is regulary used by the SWAT team during his risk search watrants, emergency calls, and during outside agency requests for assistance. The Crisis egotiations Team (CNT) is also able to use the robot for direct communication during critical incidents when other forms of direct contact are unsuccessfrtl 15 Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Description
Quantrty
Capability
Life Span
Ordinance No. 1326Page 16 of59 Page 2269
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The AVATAR@ enhances the capabilities of SWAT and tactical response teams by allowing them to inspect dangerous situations quickly and safely, there is no longer a need to send personnel in before you've had a chance to assess the situation. The AVATAR@ saves lives by keeping frst responders out of harm's way, and it does so at a fraction of the price of other robots. The AVATAR@ Robots are regarded by tactical teams as a standard operational tool, like a ftrearm, vehicle, or piece of body armor. Departments across the United States and intemationally are using the AVATAR@ Robots
To enhance safety for officers and subjects during high risk or critical Incidents.Assisting in lawful searches and surveillance. Communications during critical incidents
$26000anticipated yearly maintenance & battery cost
$o
ln house No POSTIt is the policy of the FPD to utilize a robot only for official law enforcementpuq)oses, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

Manufacturer's Description
PurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Ordinance No. 1326Page l7 of59 Page 2270
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
asset and armored vehicle to critical incidents.

To protect and safely transport Police personnel to active scenes. Provide security It is used the SWAT and officers. for officers and the
$275,000$1,000 anticipated maintenance cost
approx.
drivers/ operators shall attend formalized instruction and be and dri instruction.
trained in vehicle
I
The BearCat is a large mobile armored vehicle used toboth officers and the public, transport personnel and equipment, and provide securityto the conduct rescues mission for
The Lenco Bearcat is an armored vehicle built on a Ford F550 framemanufactured for law enforcement purposes. The purpose of the Bearcat armoredvehicle is to provide ballistic protection to officers and citizens from gunfire. The armored vehicle stops rifle rated rounds including .50 caliber which is commerciallyavailable and beyond the protection level of shield and personal body armorpossessed by the department.

The Bearcat is often deployed several times a month by SWAT personnel while serving high risk search warrants or assisting other agency. It can be utilized by trained patrol personnel to rescue downed officers and citizens. The Bearcat has been struck by gunfire several times and protected the officers inside, behind it, andthe community.

Protecting officers allows them to contain the suspect and reduce the immediacy ofthe threat while communicating and de-escalating. Crisis Negotiations Team (CNT) have operated from inside the armored vehicles during search warrant and SWAT callouts where they communicate with the suspect and attempt to de-escalate. and is
carrler
CostsRequired Training
se
Usage
Life
Manufacturer's Description
Lenco Bearcat G2
Capability
25 Ordinance No. 1326Page 18 of59 Page 2271
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Authority for Authorized Use Use is established under FPD Policy 705. k is the policy of the Department to utilize armored vehicles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.
20 J9\/l<flL
Situations which the MCCU is authorized for use would include but not be limited tocritical and natural disasters. incidents, To be used based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident,large natural disaster or event that is
The LDV Custom Specialty Vehicle is a mobileFreightliner chassis and customized for ladfire command/communication purposes.

The purpose of the LDV Mobile Command and Communication Unit (MCCU) is toprovide an interior space for command staff to plan and organize responses to critical incidents and special events. The MCCU is specially equipped with an onboard dispatch center, a command area, arrda radio interoperability system (RIOS) which allows radio communication between local, state, and federal law enforcemententities which currently operate under different radio systems/frequencies. Thevehicle contains radios with varying frequencies including 800 megahertz, very high frequency (VHF), ultrahigh frequency (UHF), low band, and short-wave radio systems. The vehicle has internet capability and computer resources along with access to television channels allowing access to real time news/information. Thevehicle is also equipped with a video downlink system allowing command staff toview live feeds from firellaw enforcement aircraft and UAS devices. command center built on a2006
LDV Custom Vehicles Command Vehicle
I
The MCCU can be utilized for SWAT/CINT and other critical large events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events incidents, preplanned
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
Mobile Command & Communications Unit
Description
QuantiW
Capability
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
$750,000
$15,000 anticipated yearly maintenance cost
approx.

The MCCU operators will receive training in the overall operation of the vehicle to include set up and break down procedures, and skills training in the computer,dispatch, and radio systems. The drivers will receive training in the safe handling of the vehicle with the assistance of an experienced driver. Drivers will undergo California Department of Motor Vehicles commercial vehicle testing. This training will occur on a bi-monthly basis
It is the policy of the Department to use the MCCU for official fire and law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regardingoperation of motor vehicles CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Ordinance No. 1326
Page20 of 59 Page 2273
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass aUse is established under FPD Policy 300 and Policy 3l l. It is theto utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and the use of force.
once a
Federal law
$o
death. Used by
the operation
policy of the FPD
ly maintenance cost
SWAT$1,100
Capability These rifles fire an intermediate-power cartridge (.223) which is more powerful than a standard pistol but less powerful than a standard rifle. It's a short barreled rifle which allows SWAT Officers better control while inside of structures while still Life l0-1 5
Manufacturer's Description Built for the demanding use of those who protect our communities every day, the Colt Enhanced Patrol Rifle (EPR) is the next evolution in the world's mostdependable, thoroughly field-tested patrol rifle. Featuring an extended handguard that accepts modular rail segments for mounting a wide variety of pro-grade optics, lighting, and ergonomics-enhancing accessories, as well as the highly durableMagpul@ MBUS@ Pro Series front and rear back up sights and B5 Bravo buttstock.

The Colt EPR reestablishes the Colt AR-l5@ as the finest tool for local, regional, and national law enforcement
Purpose The AR-15 can stop threats of great bodily injury or death at close and intermediate ranges. The AR-15 platform is capable of firing more accurately and quicker than a pistol while holding more rounds in the and better ballistic ties.

Descri Enhanced Patrol Rifle
t4
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Colt M4 Carbine 1
International AT-.308
Ordinance No. 1326Page2l of59 Page 2274
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
4 This weapon shoots a heavier round. It is utilized when there is a potential need toengage a target further away than the capabilities of our issued rifles or to engage a targetbehind an intermediate barrier such as glass or metal. The weapon is often deployed in an overwatch capacity to protect the public during events such as theInternational Marathon. 10-15 years
The AT (Accuracy Tactical) continues the legacy of the combat proven AW308 andtakes the AW to new levels. The AIAT has a 20-inch quick change barrel and a folding stock. The AT is ideal for Law Enforcement and civilian users.

The AIAT is an accurate rifle for precision shooting. These rifles are equipped withmagnified optics and can be utilized to take precision shots at intermediate to longranges. The .308 caliber bullet it shoots is also bigger and heavier than atypical .223 caliber bullet from an AR-l5 which means it will penetrate barriers like glass with less deflection.

To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death. U SWAT
sed by
$5,000
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification once ayear.

Use is established under FPD Policy 300 and Policy 3l 1. It is the policy of the FPD utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law the use of force.

Description
Quantity
Capability
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Costs
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
SWAT ShotgunaJ
Benelli M3 Tactical
Description
Quantrty
Ordinance No. 1326Page22 of59 Page 2275
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Use is established under FPD Policy 300 and Policy 311. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize shotguns only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law the use of force
$800antici maintenance cost
$o
Prior to using a shotgun, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any shotgun are uired to a once a
SWAT
To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death. Used bY SWAT
10-1 5
Benelli's M3 Tactical Shotgun delivers fast cycling
loads or pump action for low energy loads. It is available in a 12 gauge, pistol grip that satisfies a shooters need for both a semi-automatic and a pump action semi-auto fire with conventional
in one convertible
shotgun. Not having to manipulate a fore-end gives SWAT officer the ability to get backon target faster increasing officer safety. The round is good for defeating barriers.
action
This The
pump
wAT officers.
standard
S
a
by
versus
used
rounds
pump shotgun
uces time between
-automatic
red
gauge seml
capability
1S a I 2-
automatic
Authority for Authorized Use
CostsRequired Training
Authorized Usage
Life
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Capability
Enhanced Patrol Rifle
24 officers better maneuverability in and out of patrol vehicles and motorcycles. The SBR is ideal for close quarter deployments inside of structures and provides flashlights,
intermediate-power
with
(sBR)
Equi
than
rifle
police
barreled
powerful
gives
short1S more the
SBR
which
The
.s6)
rifle.
(.223 l5
standard
mounted
a
and
cartridge
than
systems
powerful
sight
but less
optical
arL
pistol
fires
pped
a standard
accuracy for distance
Life S
Colt 1.5-inch b M4 Carbine - Enhanced Patrol Rifle
Capability
Ordinance No. 1326Page23 of59
10-15 years

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a once a
the operation
Use is established under FPD Policy 300 and Policy 311. It is the policy of the FPDto utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and ederal law the use of force.

To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury orUsed the Officers death.
maintenance cost
$1,190 $s0
The AR-15 can stop threats of great bodily injury or death at close intermediate ranges. The AR-15 platform is capable of firing more accurately and quicker than a pistol while holding more rounds in the and
and better ballistic ualities.

Built for the demanding use of those who protect our
Colt Enhanced Patrol Rifle (EPR) is the next evolution in the world's mostdependable, thoroughly field-tested patrol rifle. Featuring an extended handguard that accepts modular rail segments for mounting a wide variety of pro-grade optics, lighting, and ergonomics-enhancing accessories, as well as the highly durableMagpul@ MBUS@ Pro Series front and rear back up sights and 85 Bravo buttstock.

The Colt EPR reestablishes the Colt AR-l5@ as the finest tool for local, regional, communities every day, the
and national law enforcement
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Purpose
Manufacturer's Description
l0-15
Patrol Rifle
22Equipped with optical sight systems and mounted
intermediate-power cartridge (.22315.56) cartridge which is more powerful than a standard pistol but less powerful than a standard rifle. Provides improved accuracyfor distance flashlights, these rifles fire an Capability
Life
Colt 6-inch M4 Carbine AR-15
Ordinance No. 1326Page24 of59 Page 2277
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The civilian model 6920 is the civilian version of the current Colt M4 Carbine used by our modern military war fighters. Throughout the world today Colt's reliability,performance and accuracy provide our armed Forces with the confidence required to accomplish any mission, and this rifle can do the same for you. Colt's 6920 series shares many of the same features as it's combat-proven brother the Colt M4. From the forged aluminum upper and lower receivers, to the chrome lined barrel, even through the gas operated semi automatic firing system. Don't settle for imitations, the real thing, a Colt
The AR-l5 can stop threats of great bodily injury or death at close and intermediate ranges. The AR-l5 platform is capable of firing more accurately and quicker than a pistol while holding more rounds in the and better ballistic ties.

To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death.

Used the Officers
$940 $s0
maintenance cost
Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a once a
Use is established under FPD Policy 300 and Policy 31 1. It is the policy of the FPDto utilize rifles only for offrcial law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law the use of force.

Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Black Hitls Gold .308 Winchester 180 Nosler AccuBond
ammunition
700 roundsPenetrate Intermediate Residential windows/Automotive Glass Life Indefinite
Ordinance No. 1326Page 25 of59 Page 2278
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

This round is loaded with a high quality Nosler AccuBond bullet for excellent down range performance. Through a proprietary bonding process that eliminates voids inthe bullet core, AccuBond maries Nosler's traditional copper-alloy jacket with its special lead-alloy core. The result is a bullet that flies true, penetrates deep, won'tcause extensive barrel fouling, and will retain 60-70% of its weight. The white polymer tip helps protect against deformation while initiating expansion upon impact. This round is used to penetrate intermediate barriers, residential windows, and automotive glass at2,500 feet per second.To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death.

Used by SWAT
To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injuw or death.

Used by SWAT
$45
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
approx. $0
Swom members utilizing specialized ammunitions are trained by POST certifiedfirearms instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, and Policy 311. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize specialized ammunition only for official law enforcement pu{poses, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
7,600 rounds
Precision Round, Limited PenetrationIndefinite
Hornady .308 Winchester Tap 168 grain ELD Match Tap Precision bullet with Heat Shield tip delivers the excellent terminal performance TAP Precision is known for, but features a resilient, heat resistant polymer tip that improves the ballistic coefficient, resulting in higher impact velocities, less drop, less wind drift, and moreenergy on target. The round has amuzzle velocity of 2,672 feet per second.

Precision round with limited Penetration
Specialized ammunition
Capability
Life Span
Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
.308 Winchester 168 ELD Match T Precision
Description
Quanti8
Ordinance No. 1326Page26 of59 Page 2279
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

To defend against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death.

Used by SWAT
$4s
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
approx. $0
Swom members utilizing specialized ammunitions are trained by POST certified firearms instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, and Policy 3l l. It is the policy of theFPD to utilize specialized ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Authorized Usage
Costs
Required TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Ordinance No. 1326Page27 of59 Page 2280
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
5 Can be launched via the 37mm launcher
Life 5
Manufacturer's DescriPtion The Ferret@ 37 mm CS Round is a frangible projectile filted with chemical agent. upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers the .l^6 oz.alent payload inside a structure. The munitions is 4.8 in- by 1.5 in' and travels at within an effective of 50
Purpose To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and highrisk tactical Authorized Usage De-escalation tool not likelY to inflict serious injury Used SWAT
$40 $0 Costs
maintenance cost
Required Training Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certifred chemical instructors
Authority for Authorized Use U established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection J08.4. It IS the policy ofthe SE 1S FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use of force
Tear Gas
Defense T Ferret 37mm CS 1192
Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers the .l-6 oz.agent payload inside a structure. These munitions are 4.8 in. by 1'5 in' and travels at 650fps within an effective range of 50 yards' risk tactical
launcher
Purpose
Can be launched via the 37mm
ble projectile frlled with chemical agent. The Ferret@ 37 mm OC Round is a frangi such as violent civil unrest and To safely resolve critical situations 8 5
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Life
Tear Gas
Defense T Ferret 37mm OC 1160

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used by SWAT
$40anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Swom members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemicalagent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Authorized Usage
Costs
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Combined Tactical 37mm Riot CS Powder Muzzle Blast
Tear Gas
1 Can be launched via the 37mm single launcher
5 years
A cartridge designed to blast irritant powder directly from the muzzle toward a hostile crowd or individual. These mtzzle munitions are designed with a "dual-rim" enabling the operator to chamber the round in both 37MM and 40MM Launchers.However, only 37MM will deliver optimum performance as stated in this specification sheet.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and high-risk tactical operations
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injutyUsed by SWAT $40
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$0
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Description
Quantity
Capability
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
PurposeAuthorized Usage
Costs
Required TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Page29 of 59
Combined Tactical 2430 CS/ barricade
o.

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Tear Gas
9 llLlvrp4L9\r y vqr
Description
Quantity
Capability
Life Span
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Costs
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent
tactical
civil unrest and
Tear Gas
5 intermediate barriers such as windows and hollow core doors. The projectiles breakupon impact and deliver agent payloads of OC powder throughout the adjacent target area.
5OC rounds designed to penetrate light to Liquid filled, non-burning, fin-stabilized Capability Canbe launched viaal2 gauge shotgun
Manufacturer's Description
Life
Purpose
Combined Tactical 2440- oc
Ordinance No. 1326Page 30 of59 Page 2283
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious i.tjury Used by SWAT
$8 $o
maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemicalagent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and of the
to State and Federal law the use of force
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
maintenance cost
$10 $o
Swom members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and -risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injutyUsed SWAT I 0
Can be launched via a 40mm launcher
5 The Ferret@ 40mm Round is non-burning and suitable for indoor use. Uprimarily by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle. In a tactical deployment situation, the 40mm Ferret is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas. Its purpose is to minimizethe risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort and/or sed
violent or ects. incapacitation of
Tear Gas
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Manufacturer's Description
Defense T Ferret 40mm barricade round, OC2260
Description
Quantrty
Capability
Life Span
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Authority for Authorized Use
Ordinance No. 1326

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of theFPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest andhigh-risk tactical operations De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT maintenance cost
$10 $o
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.

Can be launched via a 40mm launcher
5 The Ferret@ 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with a CS powder chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin stabilized utilizing barrel rifling. It is non-burning and designed to penetrate barriers. Primarily used to dislodge banicaded subjects, it can also be used for area denial. Primarily used by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impact the nose ruptures andinstantaneously delivers the inside a structure or vehicle Tear Gas
1 6
Authority for Authorized Use
PurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
CapabilityLife SpanManufacturer's Description
Defense T Ferret 40 mm barricade round, CS 2292
Description
QuantiW
Tear Gas
l0
Can be launched via a 40mm launcher
Defense T Ferret 40 mm barricade cs 2262
Description
Quantity
Capability

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
5 The Ferret@ 40mm Round is non-burning and suitable for indoor use. Used primarily by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle. ln a tactical deployment situation, the 40mm Ferret is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas. Its purpose is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfon and/or incapacitation of violent or dangerous ects.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT $10 $0
maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use offorce.

Life SpanManufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Costs
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Descri Tear Gas
I I
Capability Can be launched via a 40mm launcher.

Life Span 5
Defense T Ferret 40 mm barricade oc 2290
Ordinance No. 1326Page 33 of59 Page 2286
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The Ferret@ 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with an OC powder chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin stabilizedutilizing barrel rifling. It is non-burning and designed to penetrate barriers. Primarily used to dislodge banicaded subjects, it can also be used for area denial. Primarily used by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impact the nose ruptures and instantaneously delivers the agerx payload inside a structure or vehicle.To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and hieh-risk tactical operations
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed by SWAT $10
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of theFPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Manufacturer' s Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Defense Technology Triple-chaser separating canisterr CS 1026 Tear Gas
10 Can be hand thrown, launched, or placed into a munitions Pole 5 years
The Triple-Chaser@ CS consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the canisters separate and landapproximately 20 feet apart allowing increased area coverage in a short period of time. This grenade can be hand thrown or launched from a fired delivery system. The grenade is 6.5 in. by 2.7 in. and holds an approximately 3.2 oz. of active agent payload. It has an approximate burn time of 20-30 seconds.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest andhieh-risk tactical operations Description
QuantiWCapability
Life Span
Manufacturer's De scription
Purpose
Ordinance No. 1326Page 34 of59 Page 2287
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical rnstructors
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for offrcial law enforcement purposes, and the use of force. to State and Federal law
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used SWAT
$o
maintenance cost
$32
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
Costs
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST instructors
certified chemical
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 30 FPD to utilize chemical agents only for offrcial law enforcement purposes, and

8.4. It is the policy of the
the use of force. to State and Federal law re
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent ci -risk tactical
vil unrest and
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT $o
maintenance cost
$10
The Ferret@ l2-Gauge Liquid CS non pyrotechnical
hazndcorlmon with other products. The Ferret round is available with either liquid or powder cariers for the agent. These munitions are a2.5 in. l2-Gauge round .025 oz. of active
properties also eliminate the fire
Tear Gas
Life
10 Can be launched viaa12
5 Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Costs
Manufacturer's Description
Defense T Ferret barricade cs 3012
Tear Gas
Defense T Ferret I barricade cs 3092
o.

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
l0
Can be launched viaa12
5The Fenet@ l2-Gauge Powder CS non pyrotechnic properties also eliminate the fire common with other products. The Ferret round is available with either liquid or powder carriers for the agent. The powder carrier improves ba:ricade penetration To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and -risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT $10 s0
maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use of force.

QuantiE
Capability
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Costs
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
The Ferret@ l2-GaugePowder OC non pyrotechnical properties also eliminate the firehazardcommon with other products. The Fenet@ round is available with either liquid or powder caniers for the agent. These munitions are a2.5 in. l2-Gauge round .002 oz. of active
5 Can be launched viaa12
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and -risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT Tear Gas
l0
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Defense Technolo X'erret barricade oc 3090
Description
Quantity
Capability
Life Span
Manufacturer's Description
Ordinance No. 1326Page 36 of59 Page 2289
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
$8
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use of force.

Costs
Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrestDe-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury $o
and
Used SWAT
risk tactical
maintenance cost
$10antici
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified instructors
chemical
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and the policy of the
to State and Federal law the use offorce.

The Ferret@ l2-Gauge Liquid OC non pyrotechnical properties also eliminate ftehazardcofirmon with other products. The Ferret round is available with either liquid or powder carriers for the agent. These munitions are a2.5 in. l2-Gauge round .015 oz. of active
the
10 Can be launched viaa12
5 Tear Gas
Authority for Authorized Use
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
CapabiliWLife Span
Manufacturer's Description
Defense T Ferret barricade oc 3010
Description
Quantity
Descri Tear Gas
I 0
Can be launched viaa12
Defense T barricade CS 23
Page37 of59 Page 2290
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT $10antici
$o
maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors.
se is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use of force.

Life Span
Manufacturer's De scription
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
$10antici maintenance cost
$0
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified instructors.
chemical
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and of the
the use of force: to State and Federal law
4 Can be launched viaa12
5To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil urnest and 12 barricade round with a small CS
-risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury sed SWAT
Tear Gas
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
CapabilityLife SpanManufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Smith & Wesson barricade ectile, CS
Description
QuantiW

Defense Aerosol OC/CS 10s0
o.

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Tear Gas
JCan be hand thrown, launched, or placed into a munitions Pole 5 years
Designed for indoor use, this grenade contains no CFCs, is not aftrehazard andrequires minimal decontamination by comparison to smoke, powders, or liquids. The Aerosol Grenade is most commonly used in tactical situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections and was designed with indoor operations in mind when a non fireproducing delivery system is desired. It is most effective when used in confined areas and close to the target area. Used to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort and/or incapacitation of potentially violent ordangerous subjects. The Aerosol Grenade is ideal for cell extractions or barricade situations where the use of pyrotechnic, powder, or liquid devices is not practical or desired. The OC and CS combination provide sufficient effects in confined areas ofup to 1,500 square feet. The Aerosol Grenade is not recommended for outdoor use.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest andhigh-risk tactical operations De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed by SWAT $35
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Swom members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Description
QuantiWCapabilitvLife SpanManufacturer's Description
PurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Tear Gas
8Can be hand or into a munitions Pole
5 Description
QuantityCapabilitv
Life Span
Defense continuous chemical oc 1070

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The Spede-HeatrM OC Grenade is a high volume, continuous burn it expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds. The payload is discharged through four gasports on top of the canister, three on the side and one on the bottom. This launchable grenade is 6.12 in. by 2.62 in. and holds approximately 1.09 oz. of active agent.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT $ $o
maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use of force.

Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT The Riot Control OC Grenade is designed specifically for outdoor use incontrol situations with a high volume continuous burn that expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds through four gas ports located on the top of thecanister. This grenade can be used to conceal tactical movement or to route a crowd.

The volume of smoke and agent is vast and obtrusive. This launchable grenade is 6.0 or into a munitions Pole
crowd
ln. 2.35 in. and holds
5Can be hand
5 0.88 oz. of active
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil urnest and risk tactical
Tear Gas
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CapabilityLife SpanManufacturer's Description
Defense T Riot control continuous oc 1080
Description
Quanti8
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
$3s
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of theFPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Costs
Required TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Defense Technology Instantaneous blast CS grenade 1042
Tear Gas4
Can be hand thown, launched, or placed into a munitions Pole 5 years
The Instantaneous Blast CS Grenade is designed for indoor or outdoor use; thisgrenade's powder is expelled upon initiation of a small internal detonator that has sufficient force to split the canister at six machined groves on the outside surface. this device is well suited for affecting numerous subjects grouped within a containedportion of a prison yard or area, using wind to the advantage. This 6.12 in.by 2.62 in. grenade will deliver approximately 1.5 oz. of active agent.To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and high-risk tactical operations
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used by SWAT
$35
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$0
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Description
Quantity
Capability
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
PurposeAuthorized Usage
Costs
Required TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Tear Gas
Defense Technology Spede-Heat continuous discharge chemical grenade, CS 1072 Description
o.

Page4l of59 Page 2294
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
4 Can be hand launched, or into a munitions Pole
Life S 5
Manufacturer's Description The Spede-HeatrM CS Grenade is a high volume, continuous bum it expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds. The payload is discharged through four gas ports on top of the canister, three on the side and one on the bottom. This launchable grenade is 6.12 in. by 2.62 in. and holds approximately 2.9 oz. of active agent' Purpose To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and risk tactical
Authorized Usage De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used SWAT
Costs $3s $o
maintenance cost
Required Training Swom members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors
300, subsection 308 4. It the policy ofthe Authority for Authorized USE Use 1S established under the FPD Policy 1S FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement pu{poses, and to State and Federal law the use of force.

Tear Gas
or into a munitions Pole
Life
2 Can be hand thrown,
5 Defense T Flameless tri-chamber CS 1032
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The design of the Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Grenade allows the contents to burn within an intemal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The grenade is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This grenade will deliver approximately .70 oz. of agent during tts20-25 seconds burn time. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade can be used in crowd control as well as tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections, but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is to minimizethe risks to all parties pain compliance, temporary discomfort, andlot incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals' effectiveness via heat and vaporization, while minimizing or negating thechance of fire to the structure.

Swom members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors.

Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
J
Can be hand or into a munitions Pole
5 Tear Gas
Defense T Flameless tri-chamber OC 1030
Life S
Ordinance No. 1326
Page43 of59 Page 2296
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Designed for law enforcement and corrections, the OC Flameless Tri-Chamber Pyrotechnic Grenade combines the effectiveness of Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) as an incapacitating agent with the flexible delivery methods, range and area coverage of pyrotechnic munitions. The OC Flameless Tri-Chamber Grenade can be used in crowd control, or barricade situations, as a less lethal solution to incapacitate subjects through temporary respiratory discomfort, while reducing or negating thechance of fire to structures. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade can be used incrowd control as well as tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections, but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is to minimizethe risks to all partiesthrough pain compliance, temporary discomfort, andlor incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing thechemicals' effectiveness via heat and vaporization, while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure.To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and -risk tactical
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT $35
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$0
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law the use of force.

Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Can be hand thrown, launched, or into a munitions Pole
5 Tear Gas
I4
Capability
Life Span
Defense Riot control continuous cs 1082
Description
Quantity

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Swom members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST instructors.
certified chemical
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 30E FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and .4. It is the policy of the
the use offorce. to State and Federal law
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious inju.yUsed SWAT maintenance cost
$35 $o
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and tactical
The Riot Control CS Grenade is designed specifically
control situations with a high volume continuous burn that expels its payload inapproximately 20-40 seconds through four gas ports located on the top of the canister. This grenade can be used to conceal tactical movement or to route a crowd.The volume of smoke and agent is vast and obtrusive. This launchable grenade is 6.0 for outdoor use in crowd
m. 235 in. and holds 2.7 oz. of active
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Purpose
Manufacturer's Description
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed SWAT To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and tactical
Tear Gas
or into a munitions Pole
ll
Can be hand
5 The Pocket Tactical cs Grenade is small, and lightweight. The 0.9 oz. agent will burn approximately 20-40 seconds. At4.75 in. by 1.4 inches in size, iteasily fits in most tactical pouches. This is a launchable grenade; however it isnormally used as a signaling or covering device. Though this device is slightly over four inches in length, it produces a smoke cloud so fast it appears to be an of active
screen a fulI size tactical
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Description
QuantiE
Capability
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
Defense T Pocket tactical cs 1016

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
$35
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$0
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law the use offorce.

CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest andhigh-risk tactical operations De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used SWAT
$0
maintenance cost
$3s
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified instructors
chemical
The Pocket Tactical OC Grenade is a quick burning, reduced volume, continuousdischarge grenade. Pelletized chemical agent is discharged through one (1) gas port located on the bottom of the canister. The Pocket Tactical Grenade is a small,lightweight, easily carried device that provides a medium volume of chemical agent or smoke for certain situations. It was designed with the tactical team in mind fordistraction, concealment, rescue, or signaling. The pocket grenade is not specifically intended as a crowd management device; however, it can be used in chemicalconfigurations in conjunction with larger smoke canisters to "piggy back" chemical agent into a predominately smoke environment. This device should be deployed utilizing wind
Tear Gas
l5
Can be hand thrown, launched, or placed into a munitions Pole 5 Required Training
PurposeAuthorized Usage
Costs
QuantityCapabilityLife SpanManufacturer's Description
Defense T Pocket tactical oc 1019
Description
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Policy
utilize
established
ofthe
and
1S the policy
pu{poses,
308.4 It
force
enforcement
of
sectron
use
law
sub
the
.J00
only for official
law
the FPD
agents
Federal
under
and
chemical
to State
to
SE 1S
FPD
Authority for Authorized Use U
Tear Gas
10 launched 4Omm launcher Can be vla a
5 tool forThe 40 mm Muzzle Blast OC Round 1S widely used as a crowd management Manufacturer's DescriPtion of chemical agent. It can also be employed 1n the immediate and cloSE deployment tactical operations such AS barricaded subjects for area denial, area contamination, f contaminating crawl spaces and attics As a parn compliance round it and a means o close for excellent device for deploying chemical- laden OC powder at ranges 1S an of30 feet l9 1 indoor or outdoor operations. It has a maxlmum effective range meters
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and Purpose -risk tactical
Authorized Usage De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used SWAT $o
Costs $3s
maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical Required Training instructors. policy ofthe Authorized Use U established under the FPD Policy J00, subsection J08.4. It 1S the Authority for SE 1S and FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement pu4)osss, toState and Federal law the use of force.

Life
Defense T Muzzle blast 40 mm round, oc 6040
T6
vla a 40mm launcher Can be launched
Tear Gas
Life S
Muzzle blast 40 mm cs 6042 I)efense
Page47 of59 Page 2300
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The 40 mm Muzzle Blast CS Round is widely used as a crowd management tool for the immediate and close deployment. It can also be employed in tactical operations such as barricaded subjects, room clearing, area denial, and for small spacecontamination, and a means of contaminating crawl spaces and attics. As a paincompliance round it is an excellent device for deploying chemical-laden CS powder at close ranges for indoor or outdoor operations. The cloud ofagent is very effectivein filling holes in dispersals lines or engaging crowds at close distances.

Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors.

Manufacturer's Description
Purpose
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest tactical
and
Smoke
or into a munitions Poie
t0
Can be handThe Military-Styl" Maximum Smoke Grenade comes Technology@ #3 smoke grenade. It is a slow buming, high volume, continuousdischarge grenade designed for outdoor use in crowd management situations. Emits -white smoke for 1.5 to 2 minutes.
from the Defense
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Description
QuantityCapabilityLife SpanManufacturer's Description
Defense Smoke Maximum HC Smoke 1083
5 Ordinance No. 1326Page 48 of 59 Page 2301
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
$38 $0
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical instructors
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and to State and Federal law re the use of force.

CostsRequired Training
Authority for Authorized Use
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed by SWAT $38
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Sworn members utilizing chemical agents are trained by POST certified chemical agent instructors.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

The Triple-Chaser@ Saf-SmokerM consists three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the canisters separate and land approximately 20 feet apart allowing increased area coverage in a short periodof time. This grenade can be hand thrown or launched from a fired delivery system and is an effective way to quickly deploy a wide blanket of agent. The grenade is 6.5in. by 2.7 in. and delivers Saf-SmokerM. It has an approximate burn time of 20 seconds.

To safely resolve critical situations such as violent civil unrest and tactical
Smoke
l0
Can be hand thrown, launched, or placed into a munitions Pole 5 years
PurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
QuantityCapabilityLife Span
Manufacturer's De scription
I)efense T canister SAF-Smoke 1027
Description
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
35 Capability This intermediate less lethal specialty munition allows for light sound diversion during tactical operations which allows for tactical advantage -risk situations.

Life S Reusable 25 times
Manufacturer's DescriPtion The Non-Reloadable Distraction Device@ unit incorporates an M201Al tYPe fuze with hex design gun steel body. This is compact version of the 8933 Low Roll@ body Distraction Device is the newest version of the first reusable non-bursting canister that limits movement and rolling once deployed. The compact DistractionDevice fits safely in your hand and packs all the power of the full-size Distraction Device. This is a smaller,lighter device with the same
To resolve critical situations d -risk tactical
Authorized Usage De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serlous qury Used SWAT
Costs $30 $0
maintenance cost
Required Training Prior to use, offtcers must attend inhouse training conducted by POST certified instructors or attend POST certified
Authority for Authorized Use Use is established under FPD Policy 300. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize diversion devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law the use of force
Device
Low Roll Distraction Device Defense 8933
This intermediate less lethal specialty
diversion during tactical operations which allows for tactical advantage -risk situations.
munition allows for light sound
One time use
Di Device
8 Life
I)efense T 8908CI command Initiated Distraction Device
Capability
Ordinance No. 1326Page 50 of 59 Page 2303
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

The Command Initiated Reload can be initiated on command from a remote point alleviating initiation delay when instantaneous results are desired. It is ideal foroperations utilizing bang poles, deterring retreat and achieving space denial from predetermined areas. 12" of thermo tubing is included with the reload. Some assembly and accessories are required.To safely resolve critical situations during hieh-risk tactical operations.De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injuryUsed by SWAT $35
anticipated yearly maintenance cost
$o
Prior to use, officers must attend inhouse training conducted by POST certified instructors or attend POST certified training.

Use is established under FPD Policy 300. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize diversion devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to Stateand Federal law regarding the use offorce.

Manufacturer's Description
PurposeAuthorized Usage
CostsRequired TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
Ordinance No. 1326Page 5l of59 Page 2304
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Sworn members utilizing less lethal shotguns are trained by POST certified instructors for 2 hours.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4.

FPD to utilize impact munitions only for official law enforcement purposes, and It is the policy of the
the use of force. to State and Federal law
t2 less lethal flexible baton AS munitions
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used SWAT and Patrol.
maintenance cost
$s0 $500
The Remington 870 barrel has a fixed cylinder choke for optimumperformance with buckshot and slugs at close range. A myriad of aftermarket Remington 870 accessories enables owners to customize the 870 Express for specific pu{poses. 870 Remington is a receiver milled from a solid billet of steel for maximum strength, and twin action bars Less Lethal
1 0
Deploying 12 gauge less lethal flexible baton munitions (Super t5-20
Costs
Required TrainingAuthority for Authorized Use
PurposeAuthorized Usage
QuantityCapability
Life SpanManufacturer's Description
870 Action - Less Lethal
Description
Launcher
237 MM
Capability Deploying 40mm less lethal impact projectiles and 40mm chemical agent rounds The 37LMTS is a tactical 37mm single shot launcher. The Sling Mount (LSM) and QD mounting systems allow both a single and two pointsling attachment. The 37LMTS will fire standard 37l39mml-ess Lethal ammunition, up to 8 inches in cartridge length. The Picatinny Rail Mounting System will accept awide ofenhanced 25 Manufacturer's De Ambidextrous Lateral scriptionLife Defense T 37MM Tactical Launcher
Ordinance No. 1326Page 52 of59 Page 2305
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Authorized Usage De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious injury Used SWAT
Costs $300 $0
maintenance cost
Required Training Sworn members utilizing munitions launchers are trained by POST certified chemical instructors and POST certified less lethal instructors.

Policy 300, sub 308.4 and Policy J I 1 It Authority for Authorized Use USE 1S established under the FPD sectron ) 1S policy of the FPD to utilize proJ ectile launchers only for official law enforcement puq)oses, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsectionthe policy of the FPD to utilize projectile launchers only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce. 308.4, and Policy 311. It is
De-escalation tool not likely to inflict serious inj"ryUsed SWAT maintenance cost
$300 $0
Sworn members utilizing munitions launchers are trained by POST certified instructors and POST certified less lethal instructors chemical 40mm less lethal and 40mm chemical rounds
40 MM ectile Launcher
2 40mm less lethal ectiles and 40mm chemical rounds
Designed for riot and tactical situations, the Defense
Tactical 4-Shot Launcher is low-profile and lightweight, providing multi-shot capability in an easy to carry launcher. It features the Rogers Super StocrM expandable gun stock, an adjustable Picatinny mounted front grip, and auniquedirect-drive to advance the linder Technology@ 1440 40mm
Costs
Required Training
ty for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
Life
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Defense 1440 40MM Tactical4-Shot Launcher

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
subsection 308.4, and Policy 311. It is Use Policy 300, is established under the FPD utilize official policy enforcement
force.
law
the use of
only for
law regarding
launchers
Federal
ectile
and
proJ
to State
FPD to
pursuant
of the
and
the
Swom members utilizing munitions launchers are trained by POST certified instructors and POST certified less lethal instructors chemical 3Tmmless lethal ectiles
De-escalation tool not to inflict serious Used SWAT and $300
antici
$o
maintenance cost
3Tmmless lethal im ectiles
25 spring- adv ance magazine drum shot capacity and a smooth barrel.
launcher with a six37 MM Launcher I
Authority for Authorized Use
Required Training
Authorized U
Costs
Life
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Penn Arms L637 1 37MM Pro ectile Launcher
De-escalation tool not . Used SWAT amd to inflict serious situations where kinetic energy is preferred for the incapacitation of hostile and/or individuals.
modular that is designed to be used in impact baton round The KOl is a direct fire civil and civil liberties. the 's welfare,
operations.
civilian
To
that can
safeguard
tactical
alternative
safety/will
AS high-risk
reasonable
and
no
such
1S
officer
there
of
SItuations
ectiVE
because
bj
critical
same o
nscessary
resolve
the
are
safely
These
achieve
37 MM ectile
t73Tmmlauncher
25 Authorized U
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Purpose
Life
KO1/S Baton 37MM Pro ectile
Ordinance No. 1326Page 54 of 59 Page 2307
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

FPD to utilize impact munitions only for official law enforcement purposes, and the use of force to State and Federal law
Policy 308.4. It is the policY of the Use 300, subsection is established under the FPD trained by POST certified
certified less lethal instructors.
munitions launchers are Sworn members utilizing
chemical instructors and POST
maintenance cost
$0 $30
Authority for Authorized use
Costs
Required Training
37mmlauncher
Life 25
Manufacturer's DescriPtion The KO3 is a direct fire crush nose chemical impact baton round that is designed to be used in situations where a combination of kinetic energy and chemical agents is preferred for the incapacitation of hostile and/or non-compliant individuals.

Purpose To safely resolve critical situations such as high-risk tactical operations.

These ale necessafy because there is no reasonable altemative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety/will safeguard the 's welfare, civil and civil liberties.

U De-escalation tool not to inflict serious Used SWAT and Costs $30 $o
maintenance cost
Required Training Sworn members utilizing munitions launchers are trained by POST certifred chemical instructors and POST certified less lethal instructors. subsection 308.4 It the policy ofthe Authority for Authorized Use Use 1S established under the FPD Policy 300, 1S FPD to utilize impact munitions only for official law enforcement pu{poses, and to State and Federal law the use offorce.
37 MM ectile
6 Descri
KO3OC/S OC Baton 37MM
12 ectile Launcher
1 Winchester Lake Erie Chemical Launcher Attachment

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
munitions launchers are trained by POST certified Sworn members utilizing instructors and POST certified less lethal instructors. chemical the use of force to State and Federal law
subsection
impact munitions
ofthe
and
1S the policy
pulposes,
308.4 It
law enforcement
0,
official
30 for
Policy
only
under the FPD
utilize
established
to
se 1S
FPD
U
De-escalation tool not to inflict serious . Used SWAT.
maintenance cost
$s00 $o
These launching cuPs attach to 1 2 gauge less lethal shotguns canisters of chemical or smoke
and allow us to launch
These launching cups attach to 12 gauge
or smoke. canisters of chemical
and allow us to launch less lethal shotguns
25 Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Costs
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Manufacturer's
Capability
Life
trained by POST certified Swom members utilizing munitions certified less lethal instructors.
launchers are
chemical instructors and POST
De-escalation tool not to inflict serious Used SWAT
maintenance cost
$0 $40
of lethal force is Prohibited or
undesirable.To conflict where emPloYment limit the escalation of These launching cups attach to 12 gauge
or smoke. canisters of chemical
and allow us to launch less lethal shotguns
25 breaching
Tactical
distance. abihty
launching ved.
rounds.
invol
the normal
the officers
usmg
beyond
of
when
safety
Grenade
and
stand-off
the
proper
the Pocket
ensure
extended
ect
to
will
proJ
forend
willThis
cup
shotgun
Thethrowing
Removable
t2 ectile Launcher
I
Required Training
Authorized U
Costs
Purpose
Life
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
1370 TkO/ La Defense T
Capability
Ordinance No. 1326Page 56 of59 Page 2309
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.4. It is the policy of the FPD to utilize impact munitions only for official law enforcement purposes, andpursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force Authority for Authorized Use
Sworn members utilizing munitions launchers are trained by POSTlethal instructors. certified less
Use is established under the FPD Policy 300, subsection 308.7, and Policy 311the policy of the FPD to utilize less lethal munition only for official law enforcement pu{poses, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use offorce.

It is
To safely resolve critical situations such as crowd control during riotous situations and high-risk tactical operations. These ale necessary because there is no reasonable altemative that can achieve the same objective of offrcer and civilian safety/will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, maintenance cost
Used SWAT and
civil and civil liberties.De-escalation tool not to inflict serious approx. $0 $s
Less lethal munitions
120 rounds
This intermediate less lethal specialty munition allows for direct impact of75ft from a minimum and amaximum effective
Indefinite
The Drag StabilizedrM l2-Gauge Round is a translucent l2-Gauge a 40-Gram tear shaped bag made from a cotton and ballistic material blend and filled with #9 shot. This design utilizes four stabilizing tails and utilizes smokeless powder as the propellant. The l2-Gauge Drag Stabilized Round has secured its place as theLaw Enforcement Communities' number one choice for specialty impact munitions.

This round has a velocrty of 270 fps with a maximum effective range of 75 feet. shell loaded with
Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
CostsRequired Training
Purpose
CapabilityLife SpanManufacturer's Description
Defense T Stabilized 12 Bean Round- 3027
Description
Quantity
Ordinance No. 1326Page 57 of59 Page 2310
05/10/2022 Item No.21.

American Tech Cord 500
25 the LRAD inthe field. All recelve to
law
official
the
and Federal
to utilize
to State
ofthe FPD
and pursuant
ft 1S the policy
pu{poses,
Policy J I2
enforcement
FPD
law
under
only for
SE 1S established
LRAD
U
$0
maintenance cost
$1,000
yearl
Device used for announcements
: Critical incidents, civil unrest, Any critical situation to make public announcements search and
even above and nolse. and
clarity for
heard
s
1S clearly
LRAD
exceptional
hearing,
broadcast
of
with
every
range
ensure
messages
pnmary
volce
to the
Technology
or recorded
Optimized
aveguide
live
and w
scenano.
deliver
Driver
systems
operational
vanced
LRAD
any
Used to send over
1 Authority for Authorized Use
Authorized Usage
Costs
SE
Manufacturer's DescriPtion
Acoustic Device
Descri
Ordinance No. 1326Page 58 of59 Page 2311
05/10/2022 Item No.21.
maintenance cost
approx. $150,000
$o
All offrcers deploying the vehicle barriers will receive training on how to properly and the barriers in the field. load,
It will be the policy of the Department to use the vehicle barriers for official law enforcement road closures, and events
To be used based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident, large natural disaster or community event that is taking place. event, Authorized for use would include but not be limited to critical incidents, and events
The Archer 1200 Anti-Vehicle Barrier is a portable
areas from vehicle-ramming attacks. These barriers replace wooden, and water filled barricades during special events and are easily deployed when there is an increase inthe level of threat to a specific location or crowded area. They allow for pedestrians to move between them but can stop vehicles from entering closed areas. These will be used during special events and critical incidents where pedestrian safety is a concem.

The Folsom Police Department has applied for a grant to obtain 16 barriers but have unanchored, "drop-and-stop" ba:rier for a VSM (Vehicle
solution deployment on any surface. Archer 1200 barriers has the shortest stopping Safety Mitigation)
1 trailer 2 haulers
barrier which can protect closed
distance no heavy required for in its class, modular
Anti-vehicle Barrier
L6not taken possession
10 Required Training
Authority for Authorized Use
Purpose
Authorized Usage
Costs
Life Span
Manufacturer's Description
QuantityCapability
Meridian Defense Archer 1200
Description
Ordinance No. 1326

05/10/2022 Item No.21.
,'j..'i.i,''riil'''f
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council consider and approve the attached reply to Scott Rafferty (Attachment 1) providing an unconditional commitment to continue to comply with the Brown Act.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On April 20,2022,the City received a cease and desist letter from Scott Rafferty (Attachment 2) alleging the following violations of the Brown Act on March 22,2022:

1. The failure to permit public comment before the adoption of the consent agenda, which included the enactment of Ordinance No. 1324, as required by 54954.2(a) and 5a953(a)(3);

2. The failure to recognize members of the public who raised their hands in accordance with previous instructions on how to comment prior to council action, as required by the same section; and

3. Multiple failures to announce in advance the "give notice of the means by which members of the public may access the meeting and offer public comment," i.e., that there would be no ability to offer public comment, in violation of 54953(eX2)(B). 1 MEETING DATE: 51t012022
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Consideration of Letter in Response to Demand Letter Received from Scott Rafferty Regarding Alleged Non-Compliance with the Brown Act
FROM: City Attorney's Office

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

While staff disagrees with the alleged non-compliance, the Brown Act provides a process for issues such as these to be resolved without further legal action. To that end, the Brown Act provides a prescribed form letter that the City Council may consider approving and sending in response to Mr. Rafferty's correspondence.

POLICY / RULE
The Brown Act provides that a response to the cease and desist letter shall be in substantially the form provided in Government Code section 5a960.2(c)(1). The fact that the City Council provides an unconditional commitment shall not be construed or admissible as evidence of violation of the Brown Act. Government Code section 54960.2(c)(4).

ANALYSIS
Govemment Code section 54960.2 allows any interested person to submit a o'cease and
desist" letter to the City as a prerequisite to filing a lawsuit over alleged past non-compliance with the Brown Act. Pursuant to Section 54960.2(b), the City Council may respond to the "cease and desist" letter within thirty (30) days by providing an'ounconditional commitment" not to repeat any or all of the actions challenged. By law, an "unconditional commitment" does not constitute admission of a violation, but it does bar a potential plaintiff from pursuing litigation and collecting attorneys' fees with respect to past non-compliance related to the specific action the City has "unconditionally committed" not to repeat.

The City Council's reply must be approved in open session as a separate item of business, not under the "Consent" portion of the agenda, and in substantially the form as prescribed by the Brown Act. Once approved, the Brown Act prohibits legal action by the potential plaintiff; however, if such an action is nonetheless filed, the court is required to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice if it finds that the City Council has provided an unconditional commitment pursuant to the Brown Act.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no legal expense associated with this item as the City Council has always complied with the Brown Act. In addition, providing the attached reply may reduce the chance of litigation and any associated legal costs.

ENVIRO AL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines g15061(c)(3)), or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by Public Resources Code g21065 and CEQA Guidelines $15060(c)(3) and $15378. The City Council's consideration of a reply to the Brown Act cease and desist letter meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No environmental review is required. 2 ATT

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

1. Proposed reply from the City Council

2. Cease and desist letter dated April20,2022
Respectfully submitted,
Steven Wang, City Attorney
J

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

ATTACHMENT 1

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

May 11,2022
Scott J. Rafferty
1913 Whitecliff Court
Walnut Creek, CA94596
Re: Brown Act Cease and Desist Letter
To Mr. Rafferty:

The Folsom City Council has received your cease-and-desist letter dated April20, 2022, alleging that the following described past action of the legislative body violates the Ralph M. Brown Act:

1. The failure to permit public comment before the adoption of the consent agenda, which included the enactment of Ordinance No. 1324, as required by 54954.2(a) and saefi@)(3);

2. The failure to recognize members of the public who raised their hands in accordance with previous instructions on how to comment prior to council action, as required by the same section; and

3. Multiple failures to announce in advance the'ogive notice of the means by which members of the public may access the meeting and offer public comment," i.e., that there would be no ability to offer public comment, in violation of 54953(e)(2XB).

While the Folsom City Council strongly disputes and denies those allegations because the City has at all times complied with the Brown Act and hence there is no violation to cure or correct with respect to your demand, in order to avoid unnecessary litigation and without admitting any violation of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the Folsom City Council hereby unconditionally commits that it will cease, desist from, and not repeat the challenged past action as described above.

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

The Folsom City Council may rescind this commitment only by a majority vote of its membership taken in open session at a regular meeting and noticed on its posted agenda as "Rescission of Brown Act Commitment." You will be provided with written notice, sent by any means or media you provide in response to this message, to whatever address or addresses you speciff, of any intention to consider rescinding this commitment at least 30 days before any such regular meeting. In the event that this commitment is rescinded, you will have the right to commence legal action pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 54960 of the Government Code.

That notice will be delivered to you by the same means as this commitment or may be mailed to an address that you have designated in writing.

Very truly yours,
Kerri Howell, Mayor
2

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

ATTACHMENT 2

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

SCOI['.n J. R.AI.'X'ETT1DY
A:I"TORI\IEY AT LAa\r
I'g13a\rllrrfEcr.IsF c()(rFrT eo2)-sao-6626
avAr.DvrJT CREEI< cA 94596 RA.nnEtrl:[email protected]()M
April20,2022
Ms. Christa Freemantle
Clerk, City of Folsom
50 E. Natoma Street
Folsom CA 95630
by electronic and postal mail
cc: Mayor Kerri Howell, members of
the City Council, City Attorney
Dear Ms. Freemantle:

This letter constitutes a demand specified by Sectionl54960.2(a)(1) that the City of Folsom cease and desist from violations of the Brown Act committed in connection with the public hearing the Council conducted on Marchzz,2022. This letter also satisfies the requirement of Section 54960.2 and enables my clients to file an additional action to determine that the actions specified herein were taken in violation of the Brown Act. To the extent set forth herein, the City of Folsom may resPond to the cease and desist demand by making an unconditional commitment to cease and desist from the drallenged practices. This letter further constitutes a demand, pursuant to 54960.1,(b) that the Council cure and correct the violation.

The violations are (1) the failure to permit public comment before the adoption of the consent agend4 which included the enactment of Ordinance No. L324, as required by 54954.2(a) and 5a953(a)(3); (2) the failure to recognize members of the public who raised their hands in accordance with previous instructions on how to comment prior to council actiort as required by the same sections and (3) multiple failures to announce in advance the "give notice of the means by which members of the public may access the meeting and offer public commenf" i.e., that there would be no ability to offer public comment, in violation of 54953(e)(2XB)
On April 13,2022, Mayor Kerri Howell signed an unconditional commitment to cease and desist from violations of 5a953(e)(2)(B). My clients intend to enforce the violation of that commitment.

This letter demands that you, as City Clerk, announce that Ordinance No. 1324is null and void.
1 "Section" refers to the Govemment Code, except as noted.

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

Rafferty to Freemantle, Brown Act Demand Letter, April 20,2022, page2 Thank you from your prompt action to recognize the invalidity of this action and to remove any reference or effect of the purported statute from the municipal code or other public records of the city.

Sincerely,
/ernt n'g'Y
Scott J. Rafferty

05/10/2022 Item No.22.

This page is intentionally left blank.

05/10/2022 Item No.22.