Folsom City Council
May 10, 2022

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
Yes
The City Fire Departrnent has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvementsfor the subdivision. The City FD willveri$r adequate fire flow prior to building oermit issuance in the subdivision.The City Fire Department has reviewed and approved all proposed improvementsfor the subdivision. The City FD willveriff adequate fire flow prior to building oermit issuance in the subdivision.

CD, FD
CD, FD
B,O
B,O
3A.14-3: Incorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs. 3A14-2: Incorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fre Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the Crty of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval.
residents.
3A.14-l (as amended by wE sPA): Prepare and Implement G, I,B,C a construction Traffic control Plan.

Yes
67-62 PW
The CDD has reviewed and approved alltraffic control plans for the subdivision to verifr compliance with City ordinancesand to minimize delays to the travelling construction in the vicinity of existing
residents. Night work is necessary due to
impacts to the travelling public during the
normal workday. The night work has been
disruptive to some existing residences. TheCDD is working closely to monitor thenoise impacts in the night time hours to Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP):

Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee (SCTDF) contribution:Cal Trans and Transportation
67-63
67-64
Resolution No. 1 0069Page 50 of61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
YesYes
Yes
YesYes
YesYesYesYesYesYes
YesYes
(l) This subdivision will pay its fair shareof the following improvements with thepayment of Specific Plan Infrastructure .Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees and
Sacramento County Wide Transportation
fees collected prior to building permit
issuance in this suhdivision
See (l) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (1) above See (l) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (1) above
cD (E), PWcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), Pw cD (E), PWcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), Pw BB
(oav PFFP fee)
B
(oav PFFP fee)
B
(oav SCTDF)
B
(oav PFFP fee)
B
/nav PFFP fee)
B
(nav SCTDF)
B
(oav SCTDF)
B
(Caltrans MOI I)
B
(Caltrans
MOU/pay
SCTDF)
B
(Caltrans MOI I)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(Caltrans MOI))
3A. i5-l : ProJect Participation in Funding Transportation Improvements 3A.15-1a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection I ).3.{. I 5-l b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements at the Sibley Street/ BlueRavine Road Intersection (Intersection 2).

3.A'.15-1c: The Applicant Shall Fund and Consfuct Improvements to t1re Scott Road (West)Mhite Rock Road Intersection (Intersection 28).
3A.15-l e: Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Intersection 41 3A..15-1f: Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Ivliddle Road Intersection (Intersection 44). 3A. I 5-l h: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts to the Haz el Avenue/FolsomBoulevard Intersection (Sacramento Countv Intersection 2).

3.{.15-lj: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and CunaAh Downs Drive (Roadwav Segment l0).3.{. l5-10: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U. S. 50 as analternative to imorovements atthe Folsom Boulevard/[J.S. 50 Eastbound Ramns Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4l3.{.15-lp: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road,/ State Route 16 Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12).

3.{.15-lq: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freewav Sesment I t.

34.15-lr: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freewav Sesment 3).
3A.15-1s: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 betweenFolsom Boulevard and Prairie Citv Road (Freewav Sesment 4) 3,{.15-lu: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 betweenPrairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freewav Seement 16). 67-6567-6667-67
67-68
67-6967-7067-7167-7267-73
67-7467-7567-7667-7767-78
Resolution No. 10069Page 51 of6l

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
YesYesYes
Yes
Yes
YesYesYesYesYes
Yes
YesYesYesYesYesYes
See (l) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (1) above See (1) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) above All properties in the FPASP pay m mual
Transportation Management Fee via CFD l8All properiies in the FPASP Tr ansportation Management
pay
Fee
m mnual
via CFD 18
All properhes in the FPASP pay m mnualTransDortation Milaeement Fee via CFD 18 See (l) above
See (1) aboveSee (1) above
cD (E), PwcD (E), PW
cD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PWcD (E), PwcD (E), PWcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), Pw cD (E), Pw
cD (E), PW
PW
cD (E), Pw
PW
cD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), Pw
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(Caltrans MOII)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(oav PFFP fee)
B
(Caltrans MOII)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
B
Caltrans MOU)
B
fCaltrans MOII)
B
(Caltrans MOU)
I
(pay PFFP fee
and Transit fee)
B
(oav Citv fee)
B
(nav Citv fee)
B
(Caltrans MOU,
PFFP fee,
SCTDF)
B
(nav PFFP fee)
B
(oav PFFP fee)
3A.15-l v: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 betweenHzel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freewav Sesment I 8)3A.15-lw: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/FolsomBoulevard Ramn Merge (Freewav Meree 4). 3A.15-lx. Participate in Fair Share Funding ofImprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie CityRoad Diverse (Freewav Diverse 5) 3A.15-ly: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Direct Merse (Freewav Merse 6).3A.15-12: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie CityRoad Flvover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkwav Off-Ramp Weave (Freewav Weave 8).3A.15-1aa: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak AvenueParkwav Loon Merse (Freewav Merse 9)3,4..1S-ldd: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/EmpireRanch Road Loon Ramo Merse (Freewav Meree 23).3A.15-1ee: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak AvenueParkwav Looo Ramo Merse (Freewav Meree 29).3A.15-1ft Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound./Prairie CityRoad Looo Ramo Merse fFreewav Merse 32).3A.15-1gg: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie CityRoad Direct Ramo Merse (Freewav Meree 33).3A.15-1hh: Participate in Fair Share Funding ofImprovements toReduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/FolsomBoulevard Diverse (Freewav Diverse 34).3A'.15-1ii: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel AvenueDirect Ramo Merse (Freewav Meree 381.

34.15-2a. Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Optrons for Alternative Transportation Modes. 3A.15Qb: Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program.34.15-2c. Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association 3A'.15-3: Pay Full Cost of Identified Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program.

34.15-4a. The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).3,{. I 5-4b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Oak AvenueParkwav/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 6). 67-79
67-8067-81
67-82
67-8367-8467-8567-86
67-87
67-88
67-89
67-9067-91
67-92
67-9367-94
67-95
67-96
Resolution No. 10069Page 52 of 61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
YesYesYes
YesYes
YesYes
Yes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
See (l) above
See (1) aboveSee (l) above
See (1) aboveSee (1) above
See (l) aboveSee (l) above
See (l) above
See (l) aboveSee (l ) above
See (l) above
See (1) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (1) above
See (l) above
See (l) aboveSee (1) above
cD (E), PwcD (E), Pw
cD (E), PwcD (E), Pw
cD (E), PwcD (E), Pw
cD (E), Pw
cD (E), PwcD (E), Pw
cD (E), PW
cD (E), PwcD (E), PW
cD (E), Pw
Capitol
Southeast
Connector JPA
Capitol
Southeast
Connector JPA
Capitol
Southeast
Connector JPA
cD (E), Pw
B
(nav PFFP fee)
B
(pav PFFP fee)
B
(nav PFFP fee)
B
(oav PFFP fee)
B
/nav SCTDF)
B
(nav SCTDFI
B
(oav SCTDF)
B
(pay SCTDF)
B
(nav SCTDF)
B
(nav SCTDF)
B
(oav SCTDF)
B
(oav SCTDF)
B
lnav SCTDF)
B
(pay SCTDF)
B
(pay SCTDF)
B
(pay SCTDF)
B
(pav
PFFPAnterchange
fee)
3A.154c: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/Collese Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).34. I 5-4d: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell Intersection 2
3A.. l54e: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ IronPoint Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23) 3A.1 The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Empire RanchRoad/Iron Intersection 24 3A.154g. The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Folsom Tntersection 33).3A.154i: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoadAVhite RockRoad Intersection (Sacramento Countv Intersection 3). 3A,.15-4j: Participate in Fair Share Fundrng oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between WhiteRock Road and Kiefer 5-3A.15-4k: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between KieferBoulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8) 3A. I 5-41; Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Avenue between Curragh Drive and U.S. 50 s
3A..15-4m: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and
3A. l54n: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Rock Road between Road and Carson
3A.15-4o: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Road ,|
3A.. l54p: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 Westhound Ramns Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1). 3A.1 5-4q: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

34. I 5-4r: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between RanchoCordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). 3A.1 5-4s: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between FolsomBoulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). 3A. I 5-4t: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between PrairieCity Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). 67-97
67-9867-99
67-100
67-101
67-102
67-103
57-10467-105
67-106
67-10767-108
67-10967-110
67-11167-112
67-113
Resolution No. 10069Page 53 of6i

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
YesYes
Yes
YesYesYes
Iltilities end Sewice Svstems
YesYes
Water Supolv
Yes
See (1 ) aboveSee (1) aboveSee (l) aboveSee (l) above
See (1) above
See (1) above
See (1) above
The Phase I Sanitary Sewer infrastructure
including the off-site sewer trunk marn, the
Alder Creek Parkway sewer lift station and
forced main to serve this subdivision have
been constructed by the FPA landowners
and have been completed and accepted by
the Citv and are currentlv in oneration
The City obtained a letter from RegionalSan which provides verification that there is adequate capacrty in the existing
Regional San conveyance and treatment
system to accommodate the entire Folsom
Plan Area at buildout. Confirmation fromRegional San was required because theFolsom Plan Area is served by the existingRegional San Lift Station on Iron PointRoad. The City Sewer Lift Station andForced Main which connects to theRegional San Lift Station has beenaccepted by the City and is currently inonerationThe owner/applicant has constructed thenecessaw infrastnrcture to nrovide notahle cD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PwcD (E), PWcD (E), PWcD (E), Pw

CD, PWCD, PW
CD, PW
(pay PFFP fee)
B
(pav PFFP fee)
B
(nav PFFP fee)
B
(oav PFFP fee)
B
(nav PFFP fee)
B
(nav PFFP fee)
B
(nav PFFP fee)

M,BM,BM,B
3,A..15-4u: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / PrairieCity Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6).3A.1 5-4v: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / PrairieCity Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway OffRamp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).3A.15-4w: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak AvenueParkwav Looo Ramo Merse (Freewav Merse 8)3,{.15-4x: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / EmpireRanch Road Loop Ramo Merge (Freewav Merse 27).3A.15-4y: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie CityRoad Loon Ramo Merse (Freewav Merse 35) WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.l6-1 : Participate in Fair Share Funding of modification of the Iron Point Road/East Bidwell Street Intersection.

WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.16-2. Participale in Fair Share Funding of improvements to the Scott Road,lEaston Valley Parkway Intersection.3A.16-l : Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and OffSite Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured34.16-3: Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity3.A.. l8-l : Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability 67-114
67 -115
67-116
67-lt7
67-11867-11967-12067-121
67-12267-123
Resolution No. 10069Page 54 of61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
Yes
Condition
Satisfied? Comments
There are no above ground facilities
required to be constructed ur Mangini
Ranch Phase 2
There are no above ground facilities
required to be constructed in Mangini
Ranch Phase 2
water to the subdivision. The potablePhase I water infrastructure for theFolsom Plan Area has been reviewed, approved and accepted by the City and iscrrrrentlv in oneration.

Aeencv
Responsible

CD, EWR

I CD, EWR
Timing
I
Mitigation Measures Applicable to the Project
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-l: Design above ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.

Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.

NOISE-1-Land: Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measuresto Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic Plan Area.

Yes
M CD
The owner/applicant a participant in the
(MMRP) for the Folsom Plan Area
1 MMRP
Progrum
20 Reporting
MND
Mitigation Monitoring
from
MND)
measwes
(Backbone
the
Declaration
describes
Negative
2 Below
Infrastructure Mitigated
Plan
Folsom South of u.s. Highway 50 Backbone
Truck Management Plan at such time there
rs traffic generated from the future quanies
Yes
67-124 M,B CD, PW
67-12s
Yes
Area.

M CD
AIR-1-Land: Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Management Plan or Other Measures to The owner/applicant is a in the The off-site water infrastructure to
3A.18-2a:. Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrasfucture Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

Truck Management Plan at such time there
is traffic generated from the future quanies
serve the subdivision has been reviewed,approved and accepted by the City and iscurrently in operation. In addition, the Cityhas verified that the off-site potable water infrastructure is adequate to serve the
Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry TruckTraffic. 68-2
Air
67-126
68 Table 2.

Backbone MND Mitigafion Measures Applicable to the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Tentative Subdivision Map Project'* 2 Project that are included as part ofthe South of Highway

20. Rmch Phase
as Attachment
ff -l apply only to the portions of the Mangini
for the Backbone
numerals,
The MMRP
MND (designated by roman
50 +The mitigation measures specific to the 20 4 Backbone Infrastructure Condition
Aesthetics
68-l
Resolution No. 10069Page 55 of61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
YesYes
Biolosical Resources
YesYesYesYes
YesYesYes
Yes
YesYes
YesYesYes
(2) The City and its EnvironmentalCompliance Consultant (Helix) havereviewed all MMRP conditions andverified compliance with this MitigationMeasure. Compliance was verified prior tocommencement of grading andconstruction in Spring of 2022.Comoliance table is on file with the Citv.

See (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) ahoveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) above CD
SMAQMD
CD
SMAOMD
CD
SMAOMD
CDCD
USFWS
CD
IISFWS
CD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CDCDCD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
G,CG,C

G,CG,CG,CG,CG,CG,C
G-I.CG. I.C
G,C
G, I

G,CG,CG,C
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-1: Prepare and Implement NOX Reduction PlanBackbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2. Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX EmissionsGenerated hv ConstnrctionBackbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, ifnecessarv. Prenare and Imnlement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan.Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l: Conduct Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance andMitisation Measures or Comnensatorv MitrsationBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally ListedVernal Pool Invertebrates.Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion forlmpacts on Valley Elderhem Lonphom BeetleBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western Spadefoot ToadBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond TurtleBackbone MND Mitisation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's Hawk Nestins HabitatBackbone MND Mitieation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foragins HabitatBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored BlackbirdBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8:Nesting RaptorsBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory BirdsBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status BatsBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-13: Conduct Surveys to Identiff and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Imnlement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Comoensatorv Mitieation. if necessarv 68-368-468-568-6
68-7
68-8
68-9
68-1068-1 I
68-12
68-1 3
68-14
68-l s68-16
68-17
68-18
Resolution No. 10069Page 56 of 61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
Yes
G,C CD See (2) above Yes
68-21 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l 1: American Badger CDFW Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation CD See above Yes 68-22 of treatment G,C USACE Yes
CD
Sacramento
County
Coroner
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
See (2) above Yes
68-24 Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures OG Resources
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure M-l:Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and CD See (2) above Yes 68-25 Implement Appropriale Recommendations. G,C EWR
Yes
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure M-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion See (2) above Yes 68-27 Plan. G PW
and
Yes
Yes
See (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) aboveSee (2) above
CD
USACE
CD, PW
CD
USACE
CD
PW
CD (E)
Central Valley
Reg. Water
QualityControi
G, I,C
G, I,C
G,C
G,C
GG
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions Section 404 Permit and Section 401
of Wetlands, Other Waters of the
and Waters of the State
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l5: Conduct Tree Suwey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize IndirectImpacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site.

Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance Conduct On-Site Monitoring
of the Find, and Perform
Treaiment or Avoidance as Reouired.

Backbone MND Mitisation Measure M-3: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities.

Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion ControlPlm for the detentionBackbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
68-19
68-20
68-23
68-25
68-28
68-29
Resolution No. 10069

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
Yes
YesYes
See (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) above
cD (E)CD (E)
CD (E)
I
See
See (3) above
G. IG, I
CDCD
CD
SMAOMD
CD
G.BGB
G,C
3R 2-l c: Imnlement Fueitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate G.C potable water being utilized in the City. This conservation effort has beencompleted and validated in the Sacramento County court system and will serve'the FPA throughout buildout. The following mitigation measures were related to the previously contemplated off-site water system to be constructed to serve the FPA and therefore do not apply to this G,B
Mitigation Measures Applicable to the Project
69-1 3P .1-2a Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural Facilities.

Comments
CD
Responsible
Condition Timing
Yes
exlstlng
Instead,
the
FPA.
ofthe
the
20%
not construct
to serve
to conserve
system
landowners
waterfunding
(FPA)
off-site
Area
contributed
Plan
contemplated
landowners
Folsom
FPA
(3) Thepreviouslythe
Condition
Satislied?

38.1-2b. Plan.
to

38.2-la: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX Reduction Plan.

Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V1-4 North of U.S. Hiehwav 50 Water Improvements (FPASP). Table 3 below describes the
above
Plan
See
Area SpeciJic
MMRP
PW
Plan
20 I
Folsom
B
(MMRP) for the
Water Alternative
Program
Revised
Monitoring Reporting
measufes
50 Water
Mitigation
U SAlternafive North of Facility XII. Water Measure Proposed Off-Site MND Revised Backbone See (2) above
releasing RFB to
Prior to
Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VII-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions SMAQMD contractors
Climate
68-30
Rackbone MND Measure V-4 North of U.S. 50 WaterBackbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of u.s. Highway 50 Water ImDrovements 69-6
69-2
69-3 Yes

38. Master Plan. l-3b: See 69-4 a G
Air
69-s
68-36

69. Table 3.

Off-Stte Water
Project.*
Proposed
Map
the Revised
Subdivision
MMRP for
2 Tentative
2012
Phase
November
Ranch

2. The
Mangini
1, 20
to the
December
Applicable
approved
as
Measureswas
included
Mitigation
Facility Alternative

EIR/EIS
ite Water
the F'PASP
off-s
to
Proposed
Addendum
Revised
Alternative
Plan Project:

Facility
Specific
Water
50 Off-Site
ofU.s. Highway
Proposed
South
Revised
*The Folsom
Public Services
68-33
68-34
68-35
Resolution No. 10069Page 58 of 6i

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes

38.2-3b. Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and Implement Measures to Reduce CD Yes 69-8 DPM to G,B See (3) above Climate
CD Yes
69-9 3B.4-la: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during Construction. G,B See (3) above CD Yes
69-10 38.4-lb Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water Facilities Climate Action Plan G,B See (3) above CD (E) See (3) above Yes 69-11 34..5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement. G USACE Yes
Yes
Yes

34..5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and C CD See (3) above 69-14 with Califomia Procedures.

Soils, and Resources

38.7-1a: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Yes 69-15 CD See (3) above and Yes
YesYes
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
YesYes
Yes
Yes
Yes
See (3) above
See (3) above
See (3) above
See (3) aboveSee (3) above
See (3) above
See (3) above
See
above
See
SMAOMD
CD
SMAOMD
CD
CD
USACE
CD
CD
CD
CDCDCD
CDCD
G,B
B,C
G,C
engineering
plans
englneermg
plans
c
G,CGCG.CG,C
G.C
3B.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors 3A.5-1b: Perform an Inventory and Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Cannot be A
3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site if Required, Stop Work if Culturat Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of Perform Treatment or
3B.7-l b: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency Measures Into Final Pipeline

38.7-4: Implement Corrosion Protection Measures.38.7-5: Conduct Personnel Education, Stop PaleontologicalResources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Prepare and a

38.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Materials inComnliance with Relevant Resulations and Guidelines. 38 8-l b: Preoare and Imolement a Hazardous Materrals Management Plan.3B.8-5a: Site Assessment3R 8-5b: Develon and Imnlement a Remediation Plan. 3B.8-7a: Keeo Construction Area Clear of Combustible Materials. 59-7
69-12
69-13
69-16
69-17
69-1 8
69-19
69-2069-21
69-22
69-23
Resolution No. 10069Page 59 of61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
Hydrology and Water Quality
YesYes
Yes
CD See (3) above Yes
69-28 38.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Suffrcient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment. G,C

38.1 l-1a: Limit Construction Hours. c CD See (3) above Yes 69-29 Yes
YesYesYes
englneerng See (3) above Yes 69-34 38.1 1-3: Implement Operattonal Noise Minimization Measures CD

38. I 2-1 : Provide for Conttnued
Measure 3. l4-1a.

Access as Identified in Mitigation Yes
69-3s G,C CD See (3) above
Traffic and

38.15-1a: Prepare Traffic Control Plan. G,C CD See (3) above Yes 69-36 38 I 5-1 Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions. G,C CD See (3) above Yes 69-3739.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert G,C CD See (3) above Yes 69-3838.16-3b: Coordinate with Providers and Implement Appropriate Installation See (3) above Yes 69-39 Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions CD CD
CDFW or
Yes
69-40 J8.17 -la: Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practices. G,C See (3) above See (3) aboveSee (3) above
See (3) aboveSee (3) above
See (3) aboveSee (3) above
See (3) aboveSee (3) above
CD
CD
cvRwoB
CD
CVRWOB
CD
CVRWOB
CDCDCD
CD
G-C
G"CG,C
G,C
C
G,CG,C
G,C
3R 8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suonression Eouioment.

38.9-la: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPPand BMPs.38.9-lb: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Water Control Board.

38.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for Structural Facilities.

38.1l-lb: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging.

38.I l-lc: Maximize the Use of Noise Barriers.38.1 1-1 d: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction.38.I l-1e: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints.
69-2569-26
69-27
69-30
69-3169-32
69-33
Resolution No. 10069Page 60 of6l

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
See (3) above
See (3) above
See (3) above
The owner/applicant has acknowledged that they are currently subject to the inclusionary housing requirements in residential rental units and further acknowledged that they will be subject to any amendments to the FMC-Housing Element at such tlme amendments are made after January t,2020.

CD. PW
CD, PW
CD
CD
CDFW or
M,B
M,B
OG

38.17-1b: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program. G,C3A. l8-1 : Submit Proof of Water Supply Availability 3 A.18-2a. Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Waler ConveyanceImplement Off-Site Infrastructure Sewice System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secwed.

Facilities and
The Owner/Applicant acknowledges that the State adopted amendments to Section65850 ofthe Califomia Government Code (specifically Section 65850(g)), effectiveJanuary 1, 201 8, to allow for the implementation of inclusionary housing requirements in residential rehtal units, upon adoption ofan ordinance by the City Under the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreemen! the City vested the Owner/Applicant's rights in the affordable housing provisions contained in the City's then-existing Housing Element and Municipal Code until January 1, 2020. In the event the City amends its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance after January l, 2020 with respectto rental housing pursuant to Section 65850(9), the Project shall be subject to such rental be
Water
69-42
69-43
70 69-41
Resolution No. 10069Page 61 of 61

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

This page is intentionally left blank.

05/10/2022 Item No.8.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 10841 - A Resolution Ratiffing the City Manager's Execution of a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus, Inc for a Ladder Truck from Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. Pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.150, and the Approval of an Interfund Loan and Appropriation of Funds.

UPDATE
This item was considered and approved by the Council at its regular meeting on April 26,2022.

Unfortunately, the public was not able to participate in that meeting remotely due to technical difficulties. As a result, staff is requesting that the Council reconsider and approve this item on May 10,2022.

Before the City Council meeting on April 26th, Ihe manufacturer notified staff that new purchases will be subject to a seven percent (7Yo) increase starting on ApriI 28, 2022' bonsequently, the purchase price of this ladder truck would increase by $140,000 unless the contract was signed before April 28ft. Pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code section2.36'150, the contract was signed on April 27,2022 to avoid that significant cost increase.

I
MEETING DATE: sn012022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
Resolution No 10841 - A Resolution Ratiffing the City
Manager's Execution of a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for a Ladder Truck from Pierce Manufacturing Inc. Pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section

2.36.I50,and the Approval of an Interfund Loan and
ofFunds
SUBJECT:

FROM: Finance Department

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom Fire Department's current 100-foot aerial ladder truck was purchased in 2014 and,currently has 54,732 road miles. The vehicle has seen an increase in annual vehicle maintenance and repair costs causing it to be out of service for an extended period.

Staff was notified by Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. that a 7o/o price increase on new purchases would go into effect on April 28,2022. In order to secure the purchase prior to the price increase staff is requesting approval for an interfund loan in a not to exceed amount of $2.0 million.

POLICY / RIII,E
In accordance with Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.080, contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
The Fire Department operates one aerial ladder truck in its fleet. The apparatus is staffed on a daily basis to support the mission and tasks it routinely performs throughout the City and region. The truck is equipped with a hydraulic aerial ladder device, which allows firefighters to reach the roofs of commercial buildings up to 100 feet in height. The aerial ladder also allows firefighters to direct water on a large fire from an elevated position which is critical in keeping large fires contained to their building of origin. The apparatus also carries a large amount of equipment to meet the fire, rescue, and emergency medical tasks that it may be assigned.

The build time for this type of apparatus is approximately two years. Due to the length of time needed for the build, the increasing annual maintenance costs, prolonged out of service time on the current truck, and the upcoming price increase staff is requesting approval for the purchase of the ladder truck in the current fiscal year. An additional appropriation for this purchase will be required.

Staff is also requesting approval for an interfund loan from the Highway 50 Improvements Fund (Fund 443) to the General Fund (Fund 010) in a not to exceed amount of .$2.0 million.

The Highway 50 Improvements Fund has sufficient funds available for the loan and will be repaid with interest earnings it would have received had there not been a loan, in order to not have a loss to the fund. The loan will be for a period of no more than 10 years and the rate of interest will be the quarterly rate of return the City receives on its pooled investments.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The purchase of the ladder truck will be for a not-to-exceed amount of $2.0 million. This purchase will require an appropriation inthe current fiscal year inthe General Fund (Fund 010) 2

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

Fire Department Operating Budget for the purchase of the truck and in the Highway 50 Improvements Fund (Fund 443) for the loan to the General Fund.

The loan from the Highway 50 Improvements Fund will provide the upfront funding for the purchase and the General Fund will repay the loan over no more than 10 years at a rate of interest equal to the quarterly rate of return as shown on the City's investment report each quarter. OnApril 12,2022the City Council approvedthe use of $235,000 ofAmericanRescue Plan Act funding which will be utilized for the first payment due as repayment of the interfund loan.

ATTACHMENTS
I . Resolution No 1 084 1 - A Resolution Ratiffing the City Manager' s Execution of a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for a Ladder Truck from Pierce Manufacturing Inc. Pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.150, and the Approval of an Interfund Loan and Appropriation of Funds

2. Golden State Fire Apparatus Proposal
Submitted,
I
Tamagni, Finance Director
a
J

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

ATTACHMENT 1

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

RE,SOLUTION NO. 10841

A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE CITY MANAGER'S EXECUTION OF A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH GOLDEN STATE FIRE APPARATUS INC. FOR A

LADDER TRUCK FROM PIERCE MANUFACTURINGO INC' PURSUANT TO F,OLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.36.150, AND THE APPROVAL OF AN

INTERFUND LOAN AND APPROPRIATION OF'FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Fire Department staff has validated the need to acquire a replacement aerial ladder truck for use within the City; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed and recommended participation in a cooperative purchasing agreement with the Houston-Galveston Area Council utilizing Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc., dr purchase of a new ladder truck to ensure purchase of the best product at the best price; and WHEREAS, the current ladder truck is experiencing extended periods of down time due to maintenance and rePairs; and
WHEREAS, the build time for this type of vehicle is approximately two years; and WHEREAS, the manufacturer has notified the City that aTYo inctease on new purchases will occur on April 28,2022; and
WHEREAS, an interfund loan will allow the City to secure the production of the ladder truck prior to the cost increase; and
WHEREAS, an interfund loan would provide the upfront funding, and the loan would be between the General Fund (Fund 010) and the Highway 50 Improvements Fund (Fund 443) for a not-to-exceed amount of $2.0 million, and will be repaid over no more than l0 years; and WHEREAS, the interest rate on the interfund loan will be at the quarterly rate of return as shown on the City's investment report each quarter to not cause any loss to the Highway 50 Improvements Fund; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Highway 50 Improvements Fund (Fund 443) toprovide the loan to the General Fund in a not-to-exceed amount of $2.0 million; and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, this item was considered and approved by the Council on April 26,2022but the public was not able to participate remotely in the meeting due to technical difficulties; and WHEREAS, the Crty Manager signed the agreement on April 27 ,z}zzpursuant to Folsom Municipal Code section2.36.l50, Emergency Procurement, to avoid a cost increase of $140,000; Resolution No. 10841
Page I of2 Page 151
05/10/2022 Item No.9.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby ratifies the City Manager's execution of a purchase agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus, Inc. for a ladder truck from Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code section2.36.l50.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes an interfund loan to the General Fund (Fund 010) from the Highway 50 Improvements Fund (Fund 443) ina not-to-exceed amount of $2.0 million to be repaid over not more than 10 years at the rate of interest equal to the quarterly rate of return as shown on the City's investment report each quarter.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate in Fiscal Year 2021-22 in the Highway 50 Improvements Fund (Fund 443) a loan for the not-toexceed amount of $2.0 million and to appropriate an additional $2.0 million in the General Fund (Fund 010) for the purchase of the ladder truck in Fiscal Year 20,21-22. pASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May,2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No, 10841
Page2 of2

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

ATTACHMENT 2

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

PROPOSAL PREPARED FOR
City of Folsom
Pierce Manufacturing, lnc.
107' Velocity Ascendant Tiller
HGAC FS12-19, Code FS19VA11
April75,2022

SALES CONSULTANT
Ryon Wright
Golden State Fire Apparatus, lnc'
7400 Reese Road
Sacramento, CA 95828
209.613.3809 Cell
rvan@gqldenstatef ire.com

PARTS, SERVICE & SUPPORT
Golden State Emergency Vehicle Service, lnc.
7400 Reese Road
Sacramento, CA 95828
915.330.1638 Office
parts@goldenstatef ire.com

05/10/2022 Item No.9.
7400 Reese Roacl
Sacramento, CA 95828
Office 916.330.1638
Fax 916.330.1.649

FIRE APPARATUS
PROPOSAL PREPARED FOR:

City of Folsom
535 Glenn Drive
Folsom, CA 95630
We hereby propose and agree to furnish, after your acceptance of this proposal and the proper execution by the CITY OF FOLSOM,'hereinafter callJd "Customer" and an officer of Golden State Fire Apparatus, lnc., hereinafter called "GSFA", the following fire apparatus and equipment, hereinafter called "Product":

Submitted Date: April l-5,2O22
Proposal Number: 60475-224
Sales Consultant: Ryan Wright
Expiration
Date: April 28, 2022
One (1) Pierce Manufacturing, lnc. 107'Velocity 1,809,362.08 183,000.00 Fire Fighting Equipment
G' (54,530.00) Discount for HGAC FS12-19, Product Code FS19VA1 1 (81,696.58) tt Pre-Pavment Discount for 700% Poyment atTime of Order 1 ,856,1 35.50 SUBTOTAL
143,850.50 7.75o/o State Sales Tax
California 14.00 Tire Fee
H GRAND TOTAL 2,OO0,0OO.OO

PROPOSALSUMMARY
ffi@
This proposal includes the following items in accordance with the specifications hereto attached:
. Fire apparatus and equiPment
' Delivery to GSFA service center in Sacramento
. Final Delivery to Customer head quarters
. Demonstration and familiarization of the Product

PRODUCT COMPLETION
Product shall be built in accordance with the specifications hereto attached, delays due to acts of God, strikes, war, or intentional conflict, failures to obtain chassis, materials, unusual weather conditions or other causes beyond GSFA's control not preventing, within approximately 750 to 780 CALENDAR DAYS after receipt of this order and the acceptance thereof at our. br.r"r"nlo, California office. Within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of this order and acceptance thereof, GSFA shall submit to Customer a production schedule including tentative pre-construction conference, final inspection and final delivery dates.

DELIVERY LOCATION
Product shall be shipped in accordance with the specifications hereto attached and be delivered to you at FOLSOM.

CALIFORNIA. Proof of insurance must be demonstrated by the Customer to GSFA prior to transferring of the Product(s).

05/10/2022 Item No.9.

ACCEPTING THIS PROPOSAL
ln the event Customer wishes to purchase the Product described in this Proposal and the attached specifications, then, prior to the expiration date listed on page 2 of this Proposal, Customer shall sign and return this Proposal. Thereafter, GSFA and Customer will endeavor to enter into a purchase agreement incorporating this Proposal and including additional terms (a "Purchase Agreement"). lf Customer returns a signed copy of this Proposal alone, GSFA will send Customer its form of Purchase Agreement for Customer's review and signature. lf Customer desires to use its standard form of purchase order as the Purchase Agreement, then Customer should return a signed copy of this Proposalalongwithacopyofsuchourchaseorder.AllpurchaseordersshallbemadeouttoGSFA. GSFAwillreviewsuchpurchaseorder and contact the Customer regarding any required revisions. Only upon a full execution of a Purchase Agreement shall GSFA and Customer be obligated to purchase and sell the Product set forth in this Proposal.

TERMSAND CONDITIONS
The following Terms and Conditions are hereby made part of this Proposal:

1. Payment Terms (100% Pre-Pavment at Time of Order) -
Customer shall pay the amount listed on page one of this Proposal, which includes: (i) the total price for the Product (the "Purchase Price"), (ii) the estimated state sales tax on the Product, and (iii) the California tire fee (together with the Purchase Price and estimated state sales tax, the "Grand Total") within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date on which the Purchase Agreement is fully executed. The proposed delivery -timeframe for the Product, which is outlined on page one of this Proposal, shall not begin until full payment of the Grand Total is received. ln the event Customer does not pay GSFA the Grand Total in the timeframe set forth in this Section 1, GSFA may, in its sole discretion, cancel the Purchase Agreement entered into between the parties.

2. Multiple Unit Purchase - lf the Purchase Price includes pricing for multiple units, the price stated on this Proposal shall only be valid if the quantity of Products being proposed are purchased at the same time, pursuant to the same Purchase Agreement.

3. Stock / Demo Units - lf applicable, any stock/demo units, including those identified by this Proposal, are available for sale on an as-is, first-come and first served-basis. Regardless of this Proposal, the first Customer to enter into a Purchase Agreement identifying any such stock/demo unites shall obtain said units.

4. Order Changes - The Customer may request that GSFA
incorporate a change to the Product or the Specifications for the Product by delivering a written change order to GSFA, which shall include a description of the proposed change sufficient to permit GSFA to evaluate the feasibility of such change (a "Change Order"). GSFA will provide Customer a written response (a "Response") stating (i) whether GSFA will accommodate such Change Order (which GSFA may decide in its sole and absolute discretion) and (ii) the terms of the modification to the order, including any increase or decrease in the Purchase Price resulting from such Change Order, and any effect on production
scheduling or Delivery resulting from such Change Order.

Customer shall have seven (7) days after receipt of the Response to notify GSFA as to whether Customer desires to make the changes GSFA has approved in the Response. ln the event Customer counter-signs GSFA's Response, Customer shall pay the increase (or be refunded the decrease) in the Purchase Price prior to final delivery to Customer location.

5. Force Majeure - GSFA shall not be responsible nor deemed to be in default on account of delays in performance due to causes which are beyond GSFA's and manufacturer's control and which make GSFA's performance impracticable, including but not limited to wars, insurrections, strikes, riots, fires, storms, floods, other acts of nature, explosions, earthquakes, accidents, any act of government, delays in transportation, inability to obtain necessary labor supplies or manufacturing facilities, allocation regulations or orders affecting materials, equipment, facilities or completed products, failure to obtain any required license or certificates, acts of God or the public enemy or terrorism, failure of transportation, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, failure of vendors (due to causes similar to those within the scope of this clause) to perform their contracts or labor troubles causing cessation, slowdown, or interruption of work.

6. Cancellation/Termination - ln the event Customer and GSFA enter into a Purchase Agreement and Customer thereafter cancels or terminates the Purchase Agreement, GSFA will charge a cancellation fee as follows: (a) 10% of the Purchase Price after order is accepted and entered by GSFA; (b) 20% of the Purchase Price after completion of the pre-construction phase of the order process; and (c) 50% of the Purchase Price after the requisition of any materials or commencement of any manufacturing or assembly of the Product by either GSFA or the manufacturer of the Product. The tier of cancellation fee applicable to any cancellation shall be in the sole and absolute discretion of GSFA.

7. State Sales Tax - Customer shall be responsible for the cost of state sales tax associated with, or attributable to the Product.

The taxes owed by Customer for the Product is subject to adjustment for the applicable state sales tax rate in effect when the Product is delivered to the Customer. Therefore, the sales tax will be increased or decreased at the time of delivery if a change in the sales tax rate has occurred, in which case Customer shall pay GSFA (or be refunded by GSFA) the applicable change in sales tax,

8. Proposal Expiration - After the Expiration Date shown on page one of this Proposal, Customer shall require GSFA's written consent to accept this Proposal.

9. Governing Law - This Proposal is to be governed by and under the laws of the state of California.

Thank you for providing Golden State Fire Apparatus, lnc. with the opportunity to provide this proposal. lf you have any questions regarding the options presented or need additional options, please contact me.

Sincerely, l. authorized
'; r;';-"1;t';;i-ery@;;; il p ; h-;;i t "
p ro p
"'e
a Prod u ct(s ) a n d a g re e
to the terms and conditions of this proposal and the specifications hereto attached' Ryan Wright
Golden State Fire Apparatus, lnc.

SIGNATURE
TITLE:
7400 Reese Road, Sacramento, CA 95828 | Office 916.330.1538 | Fax916.330.1549 DATE:

05/10/2022 Item No.9.
i l, i ,, -' i ;,'r'i
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 511012022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10842 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with McGuire and Hester for the Construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTIQN
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10842 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with McGuire and Hester for the Construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EWR) Department identifies infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water and sewer master plans, ongoing condition assessment progrilms, and regulatory changes. EWR staff completed an analysis of potential Water Treatment Plant capacity and reliability projects. Through these efforts, EWR staff identified the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project as a priority project.

There are two Reclaimed Backwash (RBW) ponds (RBW #l and RBW #2) at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) that store backwash water, which is water used to clean the filters. This backwash water can be recycled back to the headworks of the WTP. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows water agencies to recycle up to 10% of the backwash water based on the water treatment plant capacity. The WTP's current firm capacity is 35 million gallons per day (MGD), and l\Vo of the current firm capacity, or 3.5 MGD of backwash water, I

05/10/2022 Item No.10.
can be recycled back into the system. The WTP's future firm capacity will be 50 MGD. This project will increase redundancy and reliability to allow for l\Yo of the future firm capacity, or 5.0 MGD of backwash water, to be recycled back into the WTP system. Additionally, inqeasing the recycled water capacity greatly reduces the City's risk for the RBW ponds to potentially overflow.

The current piping configuration at the inlet of the RBW ponds only feeds RBW #2. This project will upgrade the piping arrangement to feed either RBW #l or RBW #2 with isolation valves. Having this operational flexibility in feeding either pond will allow for the maintenance and cleaning of one pond at a time, while the other is still operating. This project also involves upgrading the submersible pumps in the decant pump station (DPS) at the outlet of the RBW ponds to meet the peak flow of approximately 5.0 MGD. Additionally, the DPS control system will be upgraded to provide improved operational controls and flexibility. The DPS wet well also has aging and leaking slide gates that will be replaced.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with McGuire and Hester for the construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project in the amount of $1,834,000, and the budget for this agreement to include a 10% contingency in the amount of $183,400 and Appropriation of Funds.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of theFolsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $62,657 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
The City completed plans and specifications for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and publicly advertised for bids on February 16,2022. In addition, the City provided these documents to www.ciplist.com which is also picked up by several area builders' exchanges and the City of Folsom's website. The Environmental and Water Resources Department received the following bids on March 25,2022, for construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project:

Contractor Bid Amount
McGuire and Hester $1,834,000
T & S Construction Co., Inc. $2,110,000
Lorang Brothers Construction, Inc $2,280,329
Syblon Reid $2,290,000
TNT Industrial Contractors, Inc $2,297,956
Staff has reviewed the bids submitted and has determined that Mccuire and Hester is the lowest responsible and responsive bidder who meets the requirements and specifications set forth in the invitation for bids.
2Page 158
05/10/2022 Item No.10.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, McGuire and Hester for $1,834,000 with the project budgeted for this agreement in the amount of $2,017,400 which will include a llYo contingency in the amount of $ 1 83,400.

Approximate project costs to date, which include design, construction administration services, construction management and inspection services total approximately $362,625. The Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project was included in the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Plan with a total project budget of $1,072,200, which was the original assumed project cost from the initial inclusion in the FY 20l7ll8 Capital Improvement Plan. Therefore, an additional appropriation will be needed for construction costs, and staff is requesting an appropriation of $1,307,825 of which $850,086 will be appropriated inthe Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and 5457,739 in the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for a total project budget of $2,380,025. Funds are available in both Fund 520 and Fund 521 for this additional appropriation.

In February of 2021, the City was awarded a financial assistance agreement from the U.S.

Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) WateTSMART Drought Response Program for $750,000 to be utilized on three City water projects: Ashland Water System Rehabilitation Project No.l, The Empire Ranch Non-Potable Well Project, and the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project. Of the $750,000 gratrt, $250,000 was reserved for the construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project. Following completion of construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project, the City will submit to the BOR for reimbursement of the allotted $250,000 with $162,500 to be applied to the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and $87,500 to the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is replacement andlor improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), and/or 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
ResolutionNo. 10842 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with McGuire and Hester for the Construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds J
Submitted,

05/10/2022 Item No.10.

Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
4

05/10/2022 Item No.10.

RESOLUTION NO. L0842

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH MCGUIRE AND HESTER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE

WATER TREATMENT PLANT BACKWASH AND RECYCLED WATER UPGRADES

PROJECT AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has identified this project as a priority to maintain the integrity and operation of the water treatment system; and WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, plans and specifications were prepared for this work and publicly advertised for bids on February 16,2022; and
WHEREAS, McGuire and Hester was the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, with an amount of $1,834,000; and
WHEREAS' this project was included in the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Plan with a project budget of $1,072,200 staff is now projecting the total project costs will be $2,380,025; and
WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of funds in the amount of $1,307,825 is needed for a revised project budget of $2,380,025 and sufficient funds are available in the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for this additional appropriation; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attomey:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with McGuire and Hester for the Construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $1,834,000 with the budgeted amount to include a l}Yo contingency of $183,400 for a total of $2,017 ,400.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $1,307,825 for this agreement. The appropriation will be from the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) in the amount of $850,086 and from the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) in the amount of $457 ]39, for a total project budget of $2,380,025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Resolution No. 10842

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

05/10/2022 Item No.10.

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10842
Page2 of2 Page 162
05/10/2022 Item No.10.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Environmental and Water Resources Department recommends the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10843 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agieement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Environmental and Water Resources (EWR) Department identifies infrastructure rehabilitation and replacement projects through water and sewer master plans, ongoing condition assessment programs, and regulatory changes. EWR staff completed an analysis of potential Water Treatment Plant capacity and reliability projects. Through these efforts, EWR staff identified the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project as a priority project.

There are two Reclaimed Backwash (RBW) ponds (RBW #1 and RBW #2) at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) that store backwash water, which is water used to clean the filters. This backwash water can be recycled back to the headworks of the WTP. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows water agencies to recycle up to 10% of the backwash water I
MEETING DATE: slt0l2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10843 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and
Inspection Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project
FROM: Environmental and Water Resources Department

05/10/2022 Item No.11.
based on the water treatment plant capacity. The WTP's current firm capacity is 35 million gallons per day (MGD), andl}%o ofthe current firm capacity, or 3.5 MGD of backwash water, can be recycled back into the system. The WTP's future firm capacity will be 50 MGD. This project will increase redundancy and reliability to allow for lIoh of the future firm capacity, or 5.0 MGD of backwash water, to be recycled back into the WTP system. Additionally, increasing the recycled water capacity greatly reduces the City's risk for the RBW ponds to potentially overflow.

The current piping configuration at the inlet of the RBW ponds only feeds RBW #2. This project will upgrade the piping affangement to feed either RBW #1 or RBW #2with isolation valves. Having this operational flexibility in feeding either pond will allow for the maintenance and cleaning of one pond at a time, while the other is still operating. This project also involves upgrading the submersible pumps in the decant pump station (DPS) at the outlet of the RBW ponds to meet the peak flow of approximately 5.0 MGD. Additionally, the DPS control system will be upgraded to provide improved operational controls and flexibility. The DPS wet well also has aging and leaking slide gates that will be replaced.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for construction management and inspection services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project in the amount of $ 184,951 .

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 236 oftheFolsom Municipal Code. supplies, equipment, services, and construction with a value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
In October of 2018, the EWR Department completed a pre-qualification process for consultants for construction management and inspection services. Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc., HydroScience Engineers, Inc., and NV5, Inc. were three of the consulting firms selected to provide these services for this type of project through the pre-qualification process.

On April l, 2022, the City requested proposals from these consultants for construction management and inspection services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project. The EWR department received proposals from Inferrera Construction Management Group,Inc., and HydroScience Engineers,Inc., onApril 15,2022, andNV5,Inc. chose to not submit a proposal.

The fee schedules from the /rwv\ sals received are outlined below:

Consultant Fee Amount
Inferrera Construction Management Inc $ 184.9s 1
HydroScience Engineers, Inc. $226.640
NV5.Inc N/A
2 Page 164
05/10/2022 Item No.11.

EWR staff evaluated the consultant submittals based on relevant project experience, the consultant's understanding of the background and requirements of the project, qualifications and experience of the consultant's construction management team, previous work with municipalities, cost and best value to the City.

Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on the fee amount, past municipal project experience involving work of similar scope and complexity, staff coordination, and abilities for performing these types of construction management and inspection services.

The construction management and inspection for this project will require approximately 872 person-hours of highly technical and specialized services, including full-time construction inspection. The proposed fee for construction management and inspection services is consistent with recent City construction projects with respect to the construction duration.

Construction management services require full-time, on-site inspection, and include other necessary tasks such as project schedule tracking, review andlor coordination of project submittals, coordination with the other on-going City construction projects, materials testing, and overall owner representation throughout project construction.

This resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for construction management and inspection services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project in the amount of $ 184,951 .

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
The Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project was included in theFY 202I-22 CapitallmprovementPlanwithatotalprojectbudget of $1,072,200. Sufficient funds are available in both the Water Operating Fund (520) and Water Capital Fund (521) and the project for this agreement.

ENVIRO AI, REVIEW
This project is replacement and/or improvement of existing infrastructure with negligible or no expansion of use and therefore is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as noted in Title 14 - California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3 - Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Article l9 - Categorical Exemptions, Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), andlor 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).

ATTACHMENT
ResolutionNo. 10843 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and -l Page 165
05/10/2022 Item No.11.

Inspection Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project
Submitted,
Marcus Yasutake, Director

ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
4 Page 166
05/10/2022 Item No.11.

RESOLUTION NO. 10843

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH INFERRBRA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE

WATER TREATMENT PLANT BACKWASH AND RECYCLED WATER UPGRADES

PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City has identified this project as a priority to maintain integrity and operation of the water treatment system; and
WHEREAS, Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. by reason of their past experience and abilities for performing these types of services, are qualified to perform the required construction management and inspection services for the project and provide the best value to the City; and
WHEREAS, the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project was included in the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the both the Water Operating Fund (Fund 520) and the Water Capital Fund (Fund 521) for this agreement; and WHEREAS' the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for construction management and inspection services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $ 184,951 .

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10ft day of May 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10843
Page I ofl Page 167
05/10/2022 Item No.11.

This page is intentionally left blank.

05/10/2022 Item No.11.
{, ::!:ir_:t:i ir ;1r! !:

Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: slt0l2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT Resolution No. 10844 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and Setting Public Hearing for American River CanyonNorth, American River Canyon
North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IliReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COT]NCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10844 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge Il/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, NatomaValley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs.

I

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom has thirty existing Landscaping and Lighting Districts. Each year, as part of the annual assessment process, an Engineer's Report must be prepared in accordance with the requirement of Article 4 of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code andthe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

The Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 wlll address all thirty districts in one report and will be submitted for final approval to the City Council.

OnMarch 22,2022,the City Council approvedResolutionNo. 10825 -AResolutionDirecting the Preparation of the Engineer's Report for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cctbble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts within the City of Folsom for FY 2022-23. The attached resolution approves the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the thirfy districts, declares the continued assessment for each district and sets the date of the public hearing for final approval of the Engineer's Report. The attached Preliminary Engineer's Report for FY 2022-23 addresses all thirty districts in one report and is submitted for City Council review and approval. Included within the report are the following for each district:

Plans and specifications for the maintenance of the improvements (on file in the Parks and Recreation Department).

Cost estimates of maintaining the improvements.

Diagram of the assessment districts.

Estimated costs for maintaining the improvements.

Under the provision of Section 54954.6 of the Government Code, each year a public meeting and public hearing are to be held on the levy of assessments. The attached resolution sets the public hearing for the July 12,2022 City Council meeting.

POLICY / RULE
The City Council is required to adopt a resolution approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report as part of the annual assessment process pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The City Council is also required to adopt a resolution declaring intention to levy and collect assessments pursuant to Section 54954.6 of the Government Code and Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code.

A.

B.

C.

D.
2 Page 170
05/10/2022 Item No.12.

ANALYSIS
The attached Preliminary Engineer's Report (Attachment 2) prepared by the Engineer of Record, SCI Consulting Group, is for all thirty Landscaping and Lighting Districts for FY 2022-23. This report (one for each district and combined into one document) is submitted for City Council review and has been prepared in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code and includes the following: plans and specifications, estimated costs and budgets, method of apportionment, the proposed assessment for FY 2022-23, and the assessment diagram.

Assessment to Properties
Assessments to properties within each district are the same as FY 2021-22,wlththe exception of two districts; Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, and Broadstone 4. Willow Creek Estates EastNo. 2has3 zones, zones A & B have an inuease of $3.98 from $99.53 last year to $103.51 this year. Zone C has an increase of $3.66 over last year bringing their rate from $91.49 last year to $95.15 this year. Broadstone 4has 4 zones, zone A has an increase of$1.17 this year from $38.81 last year to $39.98 this year. ZoneB has an increase of $1.10 over last years rate and increased from 36.96last year to 38.06 this year. Zone C has an increase of $1.10 over last years rate and increased from $36.42to $37.52. ZoneD had an increase of $1.06 this year and increased from $35.74 last year to $36.80 this year. There are another ten districts that have escalators and are eligible for CPI increases that will not be utilized this year. Those districts are American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Broadstone 3, Cobble Ridge, Folsom Heights No.2, Natoma Valley, Prospect Ridge, The Residences, The Residences II, and Sierra Estates.

Installment Summary
The installment summaries describe short-term installments collected pursuant to Section 22660 of the Streets and Highways Code to meet the districts' future repair and replacement needs anticipated to occur within an approximate five-year time frame, as well as long-term installments collected to meet those future needs anticipated to occur within 5 to 30-year time frames.

Comparison to Last Year
District budgets for this upcoming year will continue focusing on improvements and restorations that enhance each district's commitment to water conservation, prolonging assets life, drought tolerant landscaping improvements, fire safety, and tree stewardship. As such, some districts will be retrofitting and centralizing inigation controllers, inventorying street trees, changing out plant materials to water wise varietals, and converting over to LED Streetlights. Many of the City's districts are over 20 years old and do not have escalators built J

05/10/2022 Item No.12.
into their rates to track with cost-of-living increases and economic changes. As such, districts being monitored for future outreach regarding a new assessment overlay district are Briggs Ranch (31 years old), and Hannaford Cross (31 years old), and Cobble Ridge II / Reflections II (28 years old). Lastly the City will be starting the first stages of outreach for an increase in Natoma Station in the 2021-22, and2022-2023 Fiscal Years.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Each Landscaping and Lighting District levies and collects funds to cover operating and maintenance costs. There is no fiscal impact to the City of Folsom General Fund. Below is a swnmary of the proposed assessments for FY 2022-23. There are twenty-eight (28) districts in which the assessments remain the same, two (2) districts with increased assessments, and two (2) districts that are being removed from the tax roll (Union Square because it has an HOA that manages the landscape areas and Silverbrook because there is capacity in the fund balance).

District
Annual
Assessment
per unit
Credit
or increase*
Annual
Net
Assessment
American River Canyon North s102.94 0 $102.94
American River Canyon North
No.2
$77.70 0 $77.70
American River Canyon North
No.3
$269.86 0 $269.86
Blue Ravine Oaks $218.60 0 $218.60
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 $2r3.26 0 $213.26
Brisss Ranch $122.28 0 s122.28
Broadstone $r64.99 0 $ 164.99
Broadstone Unit No. 3 $28.07 0 $28.07
Broadstone No. 4
o ZoneA
o ZoneB
o ZoneC
o ZoneD
$3 8.81
$36.96
$36.42
$35.74
$1.17*
$ 1.10*
$1.10*
$ 1.06*
s39.98
$38.06
s37.s2
$36.80
Cobble Ridse $139.64 0 s139.64
Cobble Hills Ridge
Il/Reflections II
$l13.14 0 $l r3.14
Folsom Heiehts $70.88 0 $70.88
Folsom Heights No. 2*
o Califomia Hills
o Folsom Heights No. 2
(Enclave)
$196.42
$208.38
0 0
$196.42
$208.38
Hannaford Cross $19s.78 0 s195.78
Lake Natoma Shores $ 183.58 0 $183.58
Los Cerros $ r2l.l8 0 $l2l.l8
Natoma Station
4

05/10/2022 Item No.12.
r Natoma Station
o Union Square
$91.71
s228.88
0 (taking off tax roll)
$9r.71
$0.00
Natoma Valley $856.37 0 $8s6.37
Prairie Oaks Ranch $213.61 0 $213.61
Prospect Ridge $1.173.86 0 $ 1. r 73.86
The Residences at ARC
o The Residences at ARC
r The Residences at ARC
II
$s36.67
$1,169.97
0 0
$s36.67
$1,169.91
Sierra Estates $363.68 0 $363.68
Silverbrook $138.32 (takins off tax roll) 0.00
Steeplechase $157.68 0 $rs7.68
Willow Creek Estates East $80.40 0 $80.40
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
o ZoneA
t ZoneB
. ZoneC
$99.53
$99.s3
$91.49
$3.98*
$3.98x
$3.66*
$ r03.51
$ 103.51
$9s. l5
Willow Creek Estates South $109.88 0 $109.88
Willow Sprinss $28, l4 0 s28. 14

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
N/A (This does not apply as there is no environmental review aspect to the engineer's report.)

ATTACHMENTS
l. Resolution No. 10844 - A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge Il/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs

2. Preliminary Engineer's Report - The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, May 2022
5

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks & Recreation Director
6

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT NO. 1

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

RESOLUTION NO. 10844

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT F'OR

THE F'OLLOWING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.2023 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH, AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.2N AMERICAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.3, BLUE RAVINE OAKS, BLUE RAVTNE OAKS NO.2, BRTGGS RANCH, BROADSTONE, BROADSTONE NO. 4, BROADSTONE UNrT NO. 3,

COBBLE RTDGE, COBBLE HILLS RIDGE II/REF'LECTIONS II, FOLSOM HEIGHTS, FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO.2, HANNAFORD CROSS' LAKE NATOMA SHORES, LOS

CERROS, NATOMA STATION, NATOMA VALLEY, PRAIRTE OAKS RANCH, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO. 2, PROSPECT RIDGE, SIERRA ESTATES,

SILVERBROOKO STEEPLECHASE' THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER

CANYON, THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYON II, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST, WTLLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO. 2, WILLOW

CREEK ESTATES SOUTH, AND WILLOW SPRINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Folsom, County of Sacramento, California, is the governing body for the following Assessment Districts (collectively the ooAssessment Districts").

The proposed assessment rates for FY 2022-23 are as follows:

District
Annual
Assessment
per unit
Credit
or increase*
Annual
Net
Assessment
American River Canyon North $102.94 0 $r02.94
American River Canyon North
No.2
$77.70 0 $7',7.70
American River Canyon North
No.3
$269.86 0 $269.86
Blue Ravine Oaks $218.60 0 $218.60
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 $2r3.26 0 s2t3.26
Brisss Ranch s122.28 0 $122.28
Broadstone $164.99 0 $164.99
Broadstone Unit No. 3 $28.07 0 $28.07
Broadstone No. 4
o Zone A
o ZoneB
o ZoneC
o ZoneD
$38.81
$36.96
$36.42
$3s.74
$ l. l7*
$ 1. l0*
$ t. l0*
$ 1.06*
$39.98
$38.06
937.s2
$36.80
Cobble Ridee $139.64 0 $139.64
Cobble Hills Ridge
IllReflections II
$l13.14 0 $r r3.14
Folsom Heiehts $70.88 0 $70.88
Folsom Heights No. 2*
o California Hills
. Folsom Heights No. 2
(Enclave)
$196.42
$208.38
0 0
$196.42
$208.38
Resolution No. 10844
Page I of4

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Hannaford Cross $195.78 0 $19s.78
Lake Natoma Shores $183.58 0 $ 183.58
Los Cerros $121.18 0 sr21.18
Natoma Station
r Natoma Station
r Union Square
$91.71
$228.88
0 (taking off tax roll)
$91.71
$0.00
Natoma Vallev $856.37 0 $856.37
Prairie Oaks Ranch $213.61 0 $213.61
Prosoect Ridse $1,173.86 0 $1.173,86
The Residences at ARC
o The Residences at ARC
. The Residences at ARC
II
$536.67
$l169.97
0 0
$s36.67
$1169.97
Sierra Estates $363.68 0 $363.68
Silverbrook $138.32 (takins off tax roll) 0.00
Steeplechase $157.68 0 $1s7.68
Willow Creek Estates East $80.40 0 $80.40
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
o Zone A
o ZoneB
o Zone C
$99.s3
$99.s3
$91.49
$3.98*
$3.98 *
$3.66*
$ 103.51
$ r03.51
$9s.rs
Willow Creek Estates South $109.88 0 $109.88
Willow Springs $28.14 0 $28. l4
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report for the Assessment Districts has been made, filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by the Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved. The Engineer's Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to this Resolution, Section 22565, et. seq., of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment Districts for FY 2022-23. Within the Assessment Districts, the existing and proposed improvements are generally described as follows:

The improvements to be undertaken by the Assessment Districts are described as installation, maintenance and servicing of public facilities, including but not limited to, turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, inigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, sound walls, sidewalks, monuments, statuary, fountains, water quality ponds, park facilities, open space, bike trails, walkways, drainage swales and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry signage, street pavers, art work, and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property owned or maintained by the City of Folsom. Services provided include all necessary service, operations and maintenance of the above-mentioned improvements, as applicable, for any property owned or maintained by the City of Folsom.

Resolution No. 10844

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

WHEREAS, the Assessment Districts consist of the lots and parcels shown on the boundary maps of the Assessment Districts on file with the City Clerk of the City of Folsom, and reference is hereby made to such maps for further particulars; and WHEREAS, reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment districts and any zones therein, and the estimated cost of the improvements and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identi$' the property owned by such owner; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk shall cause a notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a notice once, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing above specified, in a newspaper circulated in the City of Folsom.

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes:

APPROVAL oF PRELIMINARY ENGTNEER'S REPORT: The City Council of the City of Folsom hereby approves, as submitted, the preliminary Engineer's Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts for FY 2022-23.

PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: The City Council of the City of Folsom intends to continue to levy and collect assessments during FY 2022-23 within the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts. Annual Assessments are the same as FY 202I-22 for allAssessments Districts, with the exception of Broadstone No. 4, and Willow Creek Estates East No. 2 who will have increases in their assessments as shown in Annual Assessment Table above. Two districts, Natoma Station-Union Square and Silverbrook are being taken off the tax rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT: Affected property owners and interested persons may review the Engineer's Report, which contains a full and detailed description of each of the Assessment District boundaries, within the city of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, the improvements, and the proposed maintenance budget and assessments upon each parcel within each Assessment District, at the City of Folsom located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California 95630 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.

Resolution No. 10844

I

2.

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

3. PUBLIC HEARING: The City Council has scheduled a public hearing on the proposed assessments within each Assessment District on July 122022, at 6:30 p.m., at the City of Folsom, City Council Chambers, 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California 95630, for the purpose of allowing public testimony regarding the proposed assessments and for the Council's final action upon the Engineer's Report and proposed assessments.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10ft day of May 2022by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10844

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

ATTACHMENT NO.2

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

FY 2022-23 ETGtNEER'S RTPoRT
City of Folsom
La ndsca ping a nd Lighting Assessment Districts
May 2022
Prelimina ry Engineer's Report
Ingineer of Work:

SClConsultingGroup
Publlc tlnanc€ ConsultlnE Servlces
&745 Mange l: Boulevard
Fairfield, California 94534
707.430.4300
www.sci-cg.c0m

05/10/2022 Item No.12.
(This Page lntentionally Left Blank)

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page i
City of Folsom
Clty Council
KerriHowell, Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Member
YK Chalamcherla, Member
Mike Koslowski, Member
City Manager
Elaine Andersen, City Manager
City Attorney
Steve Wang, City Attorney
Folsom Parks & Recreation Dlrector
Lorraine Poggione
Municipal Landscape Services Manager
Zachary Perras
Englneer of Work
SCI Consulting Group
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlOoncultlng€rcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page ll
Table of Contents
Overview
Legal Ana|ysis....,...................
.....1
.....3
Plans & Specification............

Estimate of Cost and Budget
Description of lmprovements.

Budgets
Method of Apportionment.......

Discussion of Benefit
General versus Special Benefit
Method of Assessment
Assessment Apportion ment
7 8
8 2L
23 23
26 28
28 46
49 50
50 50
51 Assessment Diagram
Category Descriptions
lmprovement Costs
Current Year lmprovement Projects ........,.

Appendix B - Assessment Roll, FY 2022-23...........:....... ........ 113 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

lntrod uction
Overview
The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts (the "Districts") provides funding for the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, sidewalks, fences, walls, parks, open space, signage, soundwalls, street lighting, and other public improvements in the City of Folsom.

Thirty such districts exist as follows:

American River Canyon North
American River Canyon North No. 2
American River Canyon North No. 3
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone Unit No.3
Broadstone No.4
Cobble Ridge
Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections ll
Folsom Heights
Folsom Heights No. 2
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Los Cerros
Natoma Station (lncluding Union Square Annexation)
Natoma Valley (Formerly Lakeridge Estates)
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
Prospect Ridge
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
The Residences at American River Canyon
The Residences at American River Canyon ll
Steeplechase
Willow Creek Estates East
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
Willow Creek Estates South
Willow Springs
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClCongultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

These assessments were established in previous fiscal years. ln each subsequent year for which the assessments will be continued, the City Council ("Council") must direct the preparation of an Engineer's Report, budgets and proposed assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. The Engineer's Report also identifies future planned projects. After the Engineer's Report is completed, the Council may preliminarily approve the Engineer's Report and proposed assessments and establish the date for a public hearing on the continuation of the assessments.

This Engineer's Report ("Report") was prepared pursuantto the direction of the Council.

This Report was prepared to establish the budget for the improvements that would be funded by the proposed 2022-23 assessments and to define the benefits received from the improvements by property within the Districts and the method of assessment apportionment to lots and parcels.

This Report and the proposed assessments have been made pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of !972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Act") and Article XlllD of the California Constitution (the "Article"). lf the Council approves this Engineer's Report and the proposed assessments by resolution, a notice of the proposed assessment levies must be published in a local paper at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing. The resolution preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report and establishing the date for a public hearing typically directs that this notice be published.

Following the minimum 10-day time period after publishing the notice, a public hearing is held for the purpose of allowing public testimony about the proposed continuation of the assessments.

This hearing is currently scheduled for July 12,2022. At this hearing, the Council would consider approval of a resolution confirming the assessments for fiscal year 2022-23.|f so confirmed and approved, the assessments would be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
lncluded is a separate but integral tool: the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting District lmprovement Plan ("lmprovement Plan"). lt is a separate planning document that identifies the type of upcoming improvement (e.9, re-landscaping a corridor or painting a wall); the estimated cos! any installments required for short-term (less than five years) and/or long term (not greater than 30 years) improvements, and the approximate schedule for completion of the improvement.

The City intends to continually update and revise the lmprovement Plan throughout each year to reflect the current status of improvement projects, budget updates and/or changes in priorities.

The concept of the lmprovement Plan arose from the City's commitment to comply with the requirements of the Act as well as produce a valuable instrument that enables the City to schedule, prioritize, and plan for needed maintenance and servicing improvements in the districts.

It also serves as a user-friendly means for members of the public to review and understand the use ofthe assessment revenues generated from each district.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Legal Analysis
Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, lnc. v Santa Clara County Open Space Authority
ln July of 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, lnc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority ("SVTA vs. SCCOSA"). This ruling is the most significant court case in further legally clarifying the substantive assessment requirements of Proposition 218 which was approved by California voters in 1996. Several of the most important elements of the ruling included further emphasis that:

Benefit assessments are for special, not general, benefit The services and/or improvements funded by assessments must be clearly defined Special benefits are directly received by and provide a direct advantage to property in each district
This Engineer's Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision and with the requirements of Article XlllC and XlllD of the California Constitution based on the following factors:

L Most of the Districts were formed prior to the passage of Proposition 218 and/or with unanimous approval of property owners, Although these assessments are consistent with Proposition 218, the California judiciary has generally referred to pre-Proposition 21.8 assessments as "grandfathered assessments" and held them to a different standard than post Proposition 218 assessments.

2. The Districts are narrowly drawn to only include the specially benefiting parcels, and the assessment revenue derived from real property in each District is expended only on specifically identified improvements and/or maintenance and servicing of those improvements in that District that confer special benefits to property in that District.

3. The use of unique and narrowly drawn Districts ensures that the improvements constructed and maintained with assessment proceeds are located in close proximity to the real property subject to the assessment, and that such improvements provide direct and special benefit to the property in that District,

4. Due to their proximity to the assessed parcels, the improvements and maintenance thereof financed with assessment revenues in the District provide a direct advantage to properties in that District, and the benefits conferred on such property in each District are more extensive and direct than a general increase in property values.

5. The assessments paid in each District are proportional to the special benefit that each parcel within that District receives from such improvements and the maintenance thereof because:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOoneultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

a. The specific improvements and maintenance and utility costs thereof in each District and their respective costs are specified in this Engineer's Report; and b. Such improvement and maintenance costs in each District are allocated among different types of property located within each District, and equally among those properties which have similar characteristics and receive similar special benefits.

Therefore, given the factors highlighted above, this Engineer's Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision and with the requirements of Article Xlllc & XlllD of the California Constitution.

Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property
On June 8, 2009, the 4th District Court of Appeal upheld a benefit assessment for property in the downtown area of the City of Pomona. On July 22,2009, the California Supreme Court denied review. ln Dahms the court upheld an assessment that was L00% special benefit (i.e. O% general benefit) on the rationale that the services and improvements funded by the assessments were directly provided to property in the assessment district. The Court also upheld discounts and exemptions from the assessment for certain properties.

Bonander v. Town of Tiburon
On December 3I,20O9, the l't District Court of Appeal overturned a benefit assessment approved by property owners to pay for placing overhead utility lines underground in an area of the Town of Tiburon, The Court invalidated the assessments on the grounds that the assessments had been apportioned to assessed property based in part on relative costs within sub.areas of the assessment district instead of proportional special benefits.

Beutz v. County of Riverside
On May 26, 20L0 the 4th District Court of Appeals issued a decision on the Steven Beutz v. County of Riverside ("Beutz") appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for park maintenance in Wildomar, California, primarily because the general benefit associated with improvements and services were not explicitly calculated and quantified and separated from the special benefits.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego On September 22,201L, the San Diego Court of Appeal issued a decision on the Golden Hill Neighborhood Association V. City of San Diego appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for street and landscaping maintenance in the Greater Golden Hill neighborhood of San Diego, California. The court described two primary reasons for its decision. First, like in Beutz, the court found the general benefits associated with services were not explicitly calculated, quantified and separated from the special benefits. Second, the court found that the City had failed to record the basis for the assessment on its own parcels,
Compliance with Current Law
This Engineer's Report is consistent with the requirements of Article XlllC and XlllD of the California Constitution and with the SVIA decision because the lmprovements to be funded are clearly defined; the lmprovements are directly available to and will directly benefit property in the Assessment Districts; and the lmprovements provide a direct advantage to property in each of the Assessment Districts that would not be received in absence of the Assessments.

This Engineer's Report is consistent with Beutz, Dahms ond Greater Golden Hil/ because the lmprovements will directly benefit property in each of the Assessment Districts and the general benefits have been explicitly calculated and quantified and excluded from the Assessments. The Engineer's Report is consistent with Bononder because the Assessments have been apportioned based on the overall cost of the lmprovements and proportional special benefit to each property. lmpact of Recent Proposition 218 Decisions
This Engineer's Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA, Dahms, Bonander - Beutz and Greater Golden Hilldecisions and with the requirements of Article XlllC and XlllD of the California Constitution based on the following factors:

L The assessment revenue derived from real property in each assessment District within the City of Folsom is extended only on specific landscaping and other improvements and/or maintenance and servicing of those improvements in that assessment district

2. The use of various assessment districts ensures that the landscaping and other improvements constructed and maintained with assessment proceeds are located in close proximity to the real property subject to the assessment, and that such improvements provide a direct advantage to the property in the assessment district, City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

3. Due to their proximity to the assessed parcels, the improvements and maintenance thereof financed with assessment revenues in each assessment district benefits the properties in that assessment district in a manner different in kind from the benefit that other parcels of real property in the City of Folsom derive from such improvements, and the benefits conferred on such property in each assessment district are more extensive and direct than a general increase in property values.

4. The assessments paid in each assessment district are proportional to the special benefit that each parcel within that assessment district receives from such improvements and the maintenance thereof because:
a. The specific landscaping and other improvements and maintenance and utility costs thereof in each assessment district and the costs thereof are specified in this Engineer's Report; and
b. Such improvement and maintenance costs in each assessment district are allocated among different types of property located within each assessment district, and equally among those properties which have similar characteristics and receive similar special benefits,
There have been a number of clarifications made to the analysis, findings and supporting text in this Report to ensure that this consistency is well communicated.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Plans & Specification
The work and improvements proposed to be undertaken by the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts (the "Districts") and the cost thereof paid from the continuation of the annual assessment provide special benefit to parcels within the Districts defined in the Method of Assessment herein. Consistent with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, (the "Act") the work and improvements (the "lmprovements") are generally described as follows:

Within these districts, the existing and proposed improvements are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundwalls, sidewalks, monuments, statuary, fountains, water quality ponds, park facilities, open space, bike trails, walkways, drainage swales and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry signage, street pavers, art work, and monuments and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property owned or maintained by the City of Folsom, Any plans and specifications for these improvements have been filed with the City of Folsom and are incorporated herein by reference.
"Mointqin" or "mointenance" meons the furnishing of services ond materiols for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
(a) Repair, removdl, or replacement of all or any pdrt of any improvement. (b) Providing for the life, growth, health, ond beouty of londscoping, including cultivotion, irrigation, trimming, sproying, fertilizing, or treoting for disease or injury. (c) The removol of trimmings, rubbish, debris, qnd other solid woste. (d) The cleaning, sandblosting, and painting of wolls ond other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
"Service" or "servicing" meqns the furnishing of:
(a) Electric current or energy, gds, or other illumindting dgent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements. (b) Water for the irrigation of any londscoping, the operation of ony fountains, or the maintenqnce of any other improvements.

The assessment proceeds from each District will be exclusively used for lmprovements within that District plus lncidental expenses. Reference is made to the Estimate of Cost and Budget, Appendix A and to the additional plans and specifications, including specific expenditure and improvement plans by District, which are on file with the City.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Estimate of Cost and Budget

Description of Improvements
Following are descriptions of improvements for the various City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts,
Amerlcan Rlver Canyon North
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians, corridors, and open spaces . Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. . Maintenance of lrrigation system, entry fountain, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights. . Purchase of electric power,
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
No planned projects
Future lmprovement Projects:

Water fall pump, autofill, filters, chlorination systems.

Waterfall pond liner.

American River Canyon North No. 2
. Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures
Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
. No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
' Paint and replace streetlight poles.

American River Canyon North No. 3
. Purchase of electric power.
. Purchase of irrigation water from San Juan Suburban Water District. ' Maintenance of landscaping, open space, lighting, signs, sidewalk and walls, waterfalls, including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, signs.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:

Centralized irrigation controller upgrade
Signage replacement.

Mystic Hills replace missing landscape.

Future lmprovement Projects:

Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).

ARC Drive/Canyon Falls (Cascade Perimeter) landscape remove/replace trees, mow band replacement.

Main Walking Trail - landscaping, irrigation, stairs and clean up.

Baldwin Dam path repair.

Waterfall rock repair.

I
Blue Ravine Oaks
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
. Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, fences, walls and streetlights. . Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures,
Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects
Blue ravine wall repair
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors.

Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.

Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, fences, walls and streetlights.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Tree remova l/replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClconsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

. Riley Street Fence Replacement
r Treeremoval/replacement.
. Signage replacement.

Briggs Ranch
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
. Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, walls, fences, open space area, signage and streetlights.
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Shrub and tree upgrades (Blue Ravine/E. Natoma)
Fence/Wa I I repa ir/replacement.

Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma Partial).

Pet station repair/replacement.

Future I mprovement Projects:

Bollard repair/replacement.

Fence repair/replacement (Blue Ravine/E Natoma)
Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma Partial).

Entry sign replacement (brass lettering)
lrrigation upgrades/replacement (3 controllers).

Landscape lighting upgrades or replacement.

Tree and Landscape lmprovements (partial collection).

Broadstone
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
. Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks,trails, sound walls, water quality ponds and streetlights.
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Tree and Landscape lmprovements (partial fund collection).

Bollard repair/replacement.

Light pole/fixture replacement of KW.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L1.

Future lmprovement Projects:
. Repair irrigation/replace shrubs - lron Point median. r Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).
. Shrub replacement throughout (some irrigation repair) 28 acres . Landscape light replacement.
r Pet station replacement (7).
r Signagerepair/replacement,
. Turfremoval/irrigation retrofit.
r lrrigation upgrades and flow (15 controllers),
Broadstone Unit No. 3
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street light fixtures
Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
. No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:
. Paint streetlight poles (350 poles).

Broadstone No.4
Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors.

Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.

Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, trails, sound walls, water quality ponds and streetlights.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r Repair irrigation, replant shrubs: Rathbone, Knofler, other interior areas . Landscape light repair/replacement (60 lights).

Future lmprovement Projects:
. No planned projects.

Cobble Hills Ridge ll/Reflectlons ll
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors . Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

I
Page L2
Maintenance of lrrigation system, plantings, sidewalks, soundwalls, signage, parks, park facilities, open space and streetlights.

Purchase of Electric Power from SMUD.

Maintenance of public lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
. Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).
. Mini Park and path to Lembi turf and shrub repair/replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects:
r Fence repair/replacement (225 feet)
' Wall repairs and painting.
. Signageimprovement/replacement.
. Tree and Landscape lmprovements (or replacements).
. Shrub replacement - Sibley/Corner, Glenn/Oxburough.

Cobble Rldge
Maintenance of shrubs and trees within landscape medians and corridors, Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom.

Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, open space areas, soundwalls, sidewalks and streetlights.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures,
Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
: Fence repair and paiting.
. Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects
. No planned projects.

Folsom Heights
. Maintenance of shrubs and trees within landscape medians and corridors, corridors, bike trails, walkways, and open space areas.
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, fences, walls, sidewalks and streetlights. . Purchase of Electric Power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L3
. Ladder fuel work.

Future I mprovement Projects:
r No planned projects.

Folsom Heights No. 2
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors, corridors, bike trails, walkways, and open space areas.
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Maintenance of irrigation system, plantings, fences, walls, sidewalks and streetlights. r Purchase of Electric Power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r Tree care in open space.
r Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects (if funded with new District):

No planned projects
Hannaford Cross
r Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water and electric power for the two mini parks in a 7O%/30%:

City/District contribution. (based on maintenance assignments) . Maintenance of lrrigation system, bike trails, walkways, fences, walls, guard shack, drainage swale, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights.
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
. Lakeside fence repair.
. Repairs at guard shack.
. Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects
No planned projects
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonnultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Lake Natoma Shores
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Maintenance of lrrigation system, soundwalls, signage, street pavers, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights.
. Purchase of lrrigation water from the City of Folsom. ' Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
LED conversion
Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects:
. No planned projects.

I
Los Cerros
. Maintenance of landscape medians and corridors.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights. . Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
Ladder fuel work.

Tree replacement.

Tree pruning
Paint street light poles.

Future lmprovement Projects
lnstall flow package and master valve
Upgrade irrigation controllers
Natoma Station
r Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, art work, open space areas, parks, plantings and streetlights.
. Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

I
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L5
Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:

Ladder fuel work
Light pole replacement
Shrub & tree replacement & concrete work on turnpike
lron Point Rd shrub & tree replacement
Bigfoot mini park tree replacement
Tree replacement / wall damage on back diamond
Shrub / tree replacement on Blue Ravine
Tree pruning.

Future I mprovement Projects
r Tree & Landscape lmprovements ( or replacements)
. Wetland area improvements
. Wall repair and painting (7800 linear feet)
. Mini park replanting / bark ( 2 parks @ .5 acre)
. Road paver replacement
. Signage repair / replacement
. Sidewalk repair
. lrrigation upgrades
' Art repair
Natoma Station-Union Square
Note: Union Square which is a Benefit zone of Natoma Station will be providing its own landscapin! and lighting maintenance via an existing homeowner's association and servicing for 2022-23.

Natoma Valley
. lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turl ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, soundwalls, retaining walls, fencing and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
' lnteriorlandscapeimprovements.
. Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects:
. No planned projects.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L6
Prairie Oaks Ranch
. Maintenance and servicing of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. . Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, fences, open space areas, trellises, and streetlights along Grover Road, Russi Road, Willard Drive, Stewart Street and the interior public roadways within the subdivisions'
. Purchase of electric power.
' Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:

No planned projects.

Future lmprovement Projects:

No planned projects.

Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
. Maintenance and servicing of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom' . Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, fences, open space areas, trellises, and streetlights along Grover Road, Russi Road, Willard Drive, Stewart Street and the interior public roadways within the subdivisions.
' Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r Tree pruning.
. Tree replacement (replace empty areas)
' LED Landscape Lights.
. Landscapereplacement.
. Fence replacement,
. Ladder fuel.
. Repair damaged walls (stucco half walls)
Future lmprovement Projects:

Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine
Landscape Replacement on Riley
Landscape Replacement on Prairie City
Landscape replacement on lron Point
Fence replacement
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L7
Post and cable replacement
Repair damaged wall
Prospect Ridge
' Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, signage, open space areas, parks, plantings and streetlights.
' Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
. Maintenance of landscape corridors.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
Tree pruning.

Future I mprovement Projects
Plant replacement.

I
I
Sierra Estates
Maintenance of landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along Rowland Court, Dolan Court and Riley Street including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, fencing, soundwalls, monuments, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, entry monuments and all necessary appurtenances
Purchase of water from the City of Folsom
Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23
Tree replacement.

Future I mprovement Projects:

No planned projects.

Silverbrook
. Note: Silverbrook will not be levied for fiscal year 2022-23, due to a surplus in revenue . Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape median. r Purchase of irrigation water from City of Folsom.
r Maintenance of lrrigation system, entry median, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L8
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
r Tree replacement.

Future Improvement Projects:
. No planned projects.

Steeplechase
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors . Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. . Maintenance of lrrigation system, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, . Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
. Fence replacement.
' Tree pruning.

Future lmprovement Projects
No planned projects, I
The Residences at American River Canyon
' Maintenance landscaping, lighting and soundwalls along American River Canyon Drive and Oak Avenue including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, sound-walls, and all necessary appurtenances. . Purchase of water from San Juan Water District.
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
Landscape replacement.

Future I mprovement Projects
No planned projects
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L9
The Residences at American River Canyon ll
. lnstallation, maintenance and servicing of turf, ground cover, shrubs, and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, street lighting, walls, signage and all necessary appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities, and equipment Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23:
. Landscapereplacement.

Future I mprovement Projects:
. No planned projects.

Wlllow Creek Estates East
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors. r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. r Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
. Purchase of electric power.
r Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
I No planned projects
Future lmprovement Projects: (if funding available)
No planned projects
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
' Maintenance of irrigation system, walls, plantings, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.
r Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom. ' Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.
. Maintenance of lawns and trees within landscape medians and corridors.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2O22-23:
2 flow packages & Master Valve lnstall
Light pole replacement (3)
Tree pruning
Oleander replacement on Blue Ravine frontage
I
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Future lmprovement Projects
Landscape replacement on Oak Avenue.

Landscape replacement on Blue Ravine.
lrrigation controller upgrade (4 controllers).

Tree and landscape improvement / replacement.

Willow Creek Estates South
Purchase of irrigation water from the City of Folsom.

Maintenance of lrrigation system, walls, entry signage, drainage way, parks, sidewalks and streetlights, as well as weed abatement.

Purchase of electric power.

Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects for 2022-23
' Tree pruning.
r New planting around replaced signs.
. lnterior sign replacement.

Future lmprovement Projects
No planned projects,
Willow Springs
. Purchase of electric power.
. Maintenance of street lighting fixtures.

Planned lmprovement Projects lor 2022-23:
. LED retrofits..

Future I mprovement Projects:
. Paint/repair Lamp Posts,
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonsultinEGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page2L
Budgets
BelowisasummaryoftheBudgetsforthevariousdistricts. RefertoAppendixA-Budgets,fordetailed budgets for each district.
lmprovement
Costs
lncidental
Gosts
Total
District lmprovement Costs
can River Ganyon North
River Canyon North 2
American River Ganyon North 3
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone Unit No.3
Broadstone No.4
Gobble Hills ll/Reflections ll
Cobble Ridge
Heights
Heights No. 2
Hannaford Gross
Lake Natoma Shores
Natoma Valley (formerly) Lakeridge
Los Gerros
Natoma Station
Prospect Ridge
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
The Residences at ARG
The Residences at ARC ll
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
Steeplechase
Willow Greek East
Willow Greek East Estates No 2
Willow Creek South
Willow Springs
TOTALS $2,735,313.17 $337,758.15
$146,500.00
$56,000.00
$373,600.00
$17,700.00
$48,800.00
$84,500.00
$192,500.00
$24,500.00
$347,500.00
$41,350.00
$13,900.00
$42,150.00
$63,275.00
$20,900.00
$25,450.00
$46,625.00
$82,400.00
$200,500.00
$19,775.00
$80,000.00
$275,000.00
$24,950.00
$24,950.00
$13,775.00
$9,513.17
$39,200.00
$26,000.00
$125,000.00
$255,000.00
$14,000.00
$6,309.54
$1,475.40
$542.54
$2,343.35
$5,917.35
$16,831.41
$66,632.70
$2,885.00
$15,210.38
$12,078.51
$2,259.82
$1,754.72
$6,952.00
$5,329.77
$4,619.67
$9,919.61
$6,943.83
$40,371.37
$6,208.65
$67,593.99
$5,950.00
$5,312.03
$o.oo
$2,127.75
$2,508.17
$6,493.00
$3,1 90.00
$15,950.00
$12,517.s7
$1,530.03
$152,809.54
$57,475.40
$374,142.54
$20,043.35
$54,717.35
$101,331 .41
$259,132.70
$27,385.00
$362,710.38
$53,428.51
$16,159.82
$43,904.72
$70,227.00
$26,229.77
$30,069.67
$56,544.61
$89,343.83
$240,871.37
$25,983.65
$147,593.99
$280,950.00
$30,262.03
$24,950.00
$15,902.75
$12,021.33
$45,693.00
$29,190.00
$140,950.00
$267,517.57
$15,530.03
$3,073,071,32
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClConsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page22
Gurrent
Projects
Benefit Units
(SFEs)
Rate Total Assessment
District
can River Canyon North
can River Ganyon North 2
River Canyon North 3
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No.2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone Unit No,3
Broadstone No,4
Cobble Hills ll/Reflections ll
Cobble Ridge
Folsom Heights
Folsom Heights No. 2
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Natoma Valley (formerly) Lakeridge
Los Gerros
Natoma Station
Prospect Ridge
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
The Residences at ARC
The Residences at ARG ll
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
low Greek East
Creek East Estates No 2
Greek South
Springs
IOIAIS
$65,000.00
$25,000.00
$250,000.00
$0.00
$20,000.00
$0.00
$o.oo
$10,000.00
$90,000.00
$0.00
$5,500.00
$28,000.00
$37,000.00
$0.00
$8,000.00
$o.oo
$45,000.00
$o.oo
$0.00
$0.00
$o.oo
$4,000.00
$4,000.00
$7,500.00
$0.00
$13,000.00
$o.oo
$50,000.00
$120,000.00
$0.00
$102.94
$77.70
$269.86 .
$218.60
$213.26 .
$122.28
$164.99
$28.07 -
$39.98 .
$113.14
$139.64 -
$70.88
$208.38 .
$195.78
$183.58
$856.37 .
$121.18
$91.70
$1,173.86
$213.61
$313.91 -
$536.67 .
$1,169.97 .
$363.68 .
$0.00
$157.68
$80.40
$'103.51 .
$109.88
$28.14
$105,204.68
$12,432.00
$275,796.92
$36,069.00
$35,187.90
$80,706.02
$390,859.66
$22,779.65
$82,560.53
$44,011.46
$13,684.72
$21,831.04
$62,386.89
$20,165.34
$20,744.54
$67,653.23
$40,837.66
$173,976.36
$31,400.76
$196,228.55
$288,367.14
$9,123.39
$11,699.70
$9,092.00
$0.00
$24,282.72
$60,058.80
$76,748.01
$160,642.36
$14,548.38
1,022
160
1,022
165
165
660
2,369
812
2,065
389
98 308
299
103
113
79 337
1,897
27 919
919
17 10
25 114
154
747
741
1462
517
$782,000.00 $2,389,079.41
* Subject to CPI increase
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SclGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page23
Method of Apportionment
This section of the Engineer's Report includes an explanation of the benefits to be derived from the installation, maintenance and servicing of the lmprovements throughout the Districts, and the methodology used to apportion the total assessment to properties within the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts.

The City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts consist of all Assessor Parcels within the boundaries of each District defined as defined by Assessment Diagram included within this report and the Assessor Parcel Numbers listed within the included Levy roll. The parcels include all privately or publicly owned parcels within said boundarips. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits to be derived by the properties in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts over and above general benefits conferred on real property or to the public at large. The apportionment of special benefit is a two-step process: the first step is to identify the types of special benefit arising from the improvements, and the second step is to allocate the assessments to property based on the estimated relative special benefit for each type of property,
Dlscussion of Beneflt
ln summary, the assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits, With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 22573 of lhe Landscaping and Lighting Acl of L972 states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon londs within on dssessment district moy be apportioned by any formula or method which foirly distributes the net amount among all ossessoble lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by eoch such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Proposition 218, as codified in Article XlllD of the California Constitution, has confirmed that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property and the assessment must not exceed the reasonable cost ofthe proportional benefit upon the assessed parcel:
"No ossessm ent shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reosonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel." The following benefit categories summarize the types of special benefit to residential, commercial, industrial and other lots and parcels resulting from the lmprovements to be provided with the assessment proceeds. These categories of special benefit are supported by various California legislation and supporting studies which describe the types of special benefit received by property from lmprovements such as those proposed by the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGoneultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page24
Proximity to improved landscaped areas within each District.

Access to improved landscaped areas within each District. lmproved Views within each District.

Extension of a property's outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the lmprovements.

Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the District and the services provided by the District, would not have been created. ln this regard, the recent the SVTA v. SCCOSA decision provides enhanced clarity to the definitions of special benefits to properties in three distinct areas:

Proximity
Expanded or improved access
Views
The SVTA v. SCCOSA decision also clarifies that a special benefit is a service or improvement that provides a direct advantage to a parcel, and that indirect or derivative advantages resulting from the overall public benefits from a service or improvement are general benefits. The SWA v.

SCCOSA decision also provides specific guidance that park improvements are a direct advantage and special benefit to property that is proximate to a park improved by an assessment:

The chorocterizotion of o benefit may depend on whether the porcel receives o direct odvantoge from the improvement (e.9. proximity to a pork) or receives an indirect, derivative odvantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.9. general enhancement of the district's property volues).

Proximity, improved access and views, in addition to the other special benefits listed above further strengthen the basis of these assessments.

Benefit Factors
The special benefits from the lmprovements are further detailed below Proximity to improved landscaped areas within the Dlstrlct Only the specific properties within close proximity to the lmprovements are included in each District. Therefore, property in the Districts enjoys unique and valuable proximity and access to the lmprovements that the public at large and property outside the Districts do not share.

I
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

ln absence of the assessments, the lmprovements would not be provided and the landscaping areas in the Districts would be degraded due to insufficient funding for maintenance, upkeep and repair, Therefore, the assessments provide lmprovements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided. lmprovements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided do not by themselves translate into special benefits but when combined with the unique proximity and access enjoyed by parcels in the Districts, they provide a direct advantage and special benefit to property in the Districts,
Access to improved landscaped areas within the District Since the parcels in each District are the only parcels that enjoy close access to the lmprovements, they directly benefit from the unique close access to improved landscaping areas that are provided by the Assessments. This is a direct advantage and special benefit to property in that District.
lmproved views within the District
The District, by maintaining these landscaped areas, provides improved views to properties in each District. The properties in a District enjoy close and unique proximity, access and views of the lmprovements; therefore, the improved and protected views provided by the Assessments are another direct and tangible advantage that is uniquely conferred upon property in a District.

Extension of a property's outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the lmprovements
ln large part because it is generally cost prohibitive to provide large open land areas in development projects, the residential, commercial and other benefiting properties in each District do not have large outdoor areas and green spaces. The landscaped areas within each District provide additional outdoor areas that serve as an effective extension of the land area for properties that are in close proximity to the lmprovements. The lmprovements, therefore, provide an important, valuable and desirable extension of usable land area, which confers a direct advantage and special benefit to properties in close proximity to the lmprovements.

Creation of individual lots for residential and commercial use that, in absence of the assessments, would not have been created
Typically, the original owner/developer of the property within the Districts can petition the City to establish the assessment districts, As parcels were sold, new owners were informed of the assessments through the title reports, and in some cases, through Department of Real Estate "White Paper" reports that the parcels were subject to assessment. Purchase of property was also an "agreement" to pay the assessment. ln absence of the assessments, the lots within the Districts would probably not have been subdivided and created. These lots, and the improvements they support, are a special benefit to the property owners.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

General versus Special Benefit
The assessments from the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts are used to fund improvements and increased levels of maintenance to the grounds adjoining the properties in the Districts. ln absence of those Districts, such lmprovements would not be provided and the properties would not have been subdivided and improved to the same extent. The Districts were specifically proposed for formation to provide additional and improved improvements, and services in the Districts. ln absence of the assessments, these public resources could not be created and revenues would not be available for their continued maintenance and improvement.

Therefore, the assessments solely provide special benefit to property in the Districts over and above the general benefits conferred by the general facilities of the City.

Although these lmprovements may be available to the general public at large because the Districts are accessible by members of the public, the lmprovements within each District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for property inside the Districts, and not the public at large. Other properties that are either outside the Districts or within the Districts and not assessed, do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefit factors described previously. These lmprovements are of special benefit to properties located within the Districts because they provide a direct advantage to properties in the Districts that would not be provided in absence of the assessments.

Although the analysis used to support these assessments concludes that the benefits are solely special, as described above, consideration is made for the suggestion that a portion of the benefits are general. General benefits cannot be funded by these assessments - the funding must come from other sources.

The maintenance and servicing of these improvements is also partially funded, directly and indirectly from other sources including City of Folsom, the County of Sacramento and the State of California. This funding comes in the form of grants, development fees, special programs, and general funds, as well as direct maintenance and servicing of facilities (e.g. curbs, gutters, streets, drainage systems, and other infrastructure maintenance items such as pond clean outs and street sweeping, etc.) This funding from other sources more than compensates for general benefits, if any, received by the properties within the districts.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$GlGoncultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

ln the 2009 Dahms case, the court upheld an assessment that was 100% special benefit on the rationale that the services funded by the assessments were directly provided within the assessment district over and above the services already provided by the City within the boundaries of the assessment district. lt is also important to note that certain services funded by the assessments in Pomona are similar to the services funded by the Assessments described in this Engineer's Report and the Court found these services to be 100% special benefit, Similar to the assessments in Pomona, the Assessments described in this Engineer's Report fund improvements and services directly provided within the Assessment District to benefit properties within the assessment district and not to the public at large, and these properties enjoy close proximity and access to the lmprovements. Therefore, Dahms establishes a basis for minimal or zero general benefits from the Assessments.

Step 1: Calculation of the General Benefit
The general benefits from this assessment may be quantified as illustrated in the following table ation of
Relative I General Benefit
Factor Contribution
vt ews
nighttime visibility and safety from streetlig,hts
Relative
General
Eenefit
90 0
5 9/t -
W/o 0.5
Total calculated General Be
l
As a result, the City of Folsom will contribute at least 1,5% of the total budget from sources other than the assessment. The contribution offsets any general benefits from the Assessment Services.

Step 2: Calculation of Current General Benefit Contribution from City The general benefit contribution is satisfied from the sum of the following components:

The City of Folsom owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the Assessment Districts improvements. This curb and gutter serves to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the City of Folsom toward general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the curb gutter is conservatively estimated to be 1%.

The City of Folsom owns and maintains storm drainage systems along the border of the Assessment Districts improvements. This system serves to prevent flooding and associated damage to the improvements, and manage urban runoff including local pollutants loading from the improvements. The contribution from the City of Folsom towards general benefit from the maintenance, and operation of the local storm drainage systems are conservatively estimated to be 1%.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The City of Folsom owns and maintains local public streets along the border of the Assessment District improvements. These public streets proved access to the improvements for its enjoyment as well as efficient maintenance. The contribution from the City of Folsom towards general benefit from the maintenance of local public streets is conservatively estimated to contribute L%' The lmprovements were constructed by the original owner/developer(s) as a condition of development. The value of the construction of the improvements can be quantified and monetized as an annuity. Since this construction was performed and paid by non-assessment funds, this "annuity" can be used to offset general benefit costs, and is conservatively estimated to contribute 25%.

Therefore, the total Genera I Benef it that is conservatively q ua ntified al. 15% is more than offset by the total non-assessment contribution towards general benefit of 28o/o.

Method of Assessment
The second step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE)' This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are designated a SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent or one SFE.

Assessment Apportionment
The improved properties within the Districts consist of primarily of single family, multi-family, commercial and non-assessed parcels, with the vast majority being single family. Since all single family residential parcels in the Districts are deemed to have good proximity to the improvements, such single family properties receive similar benefit from the proposed improvements and are assigned 1.0 SFE units. The benefits for other types of properties are further defined as follows' General Case
Many of the City of Folsom Districts contain only single family residences and non-assessed properties such as parks and green spaces. These districts are:

Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Cobble Ridge
155 residential lots
165 residential lots
98 residential lots
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections ll
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Los Cerros
Natoma Station - (Union Square Annexation)
Natoma Valley
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
Steeplechase
The Residences at American River Canyon
The Residences at ARC ll Annexation
Willow Creek East
Willow Springs
Total
389 residential lots
103 residential lots
1"L3 residential lots
337 residential lots
116 residential lots
72 residential lots
25 residential lots
122 residential lots
154 residential lots
17 residential lots
10 residential lots
747 residential lots
517 residential lots
3,L50
These Districts are assessed per Assessment Table 1, next page Assessment Table 1
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1,00
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.00
Note: ln 2006-07, a general case SFE rate was established for condominiums in districts in which the original Engineer's Report did not anticipate condominium development. This rate is 0'67 SFEs American River CanYon North
There are 4tO.t24 acres in American River Canyon North. There are 1006 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE.) The 2.00 acres of currently undeveloped property is assigned 2.63 SFEs per acre from a rate determined at the time of formation of this district:

American River Canyon North properties are assessed per Assessment Table 2, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Table 2
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.00
Undeveloped Property, per acre 2.63
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.00
American River Canyon North No. 2
There are 130.805 acres in American River Canyon North No. 2. American River Canyon No. 2 lies completely within American River Canyon North. There are L61 residential lots and each one is assigned L benefit unit (SFE).

American River Canyon North No. 2 properties are assessed per Assessment Table 3, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 3
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Residential Property, per lot 0.3273
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
American River Canyon North No 3
There are 4to.t24 acres in American River Canyon North. There are 1006 residential lots.

Each assessable parcel in the Assessment District receives a special and direct benefit from the improvements in the Assessment District. Since the Assessment District is comprised of residential single family improved properties and all properties have good proximity to the improvements, all assessable parcels within the Assessment District are estimated to benefit equally from the improvements associated with the Assessment District, and the costs associated with the improvements are apportioned equally to all parcels on the basis of current or proposed dwelling units. Each parcel is assigned SFE units relative to the number of current or proposed dwelling units on the parcel.

The procedure used to arrive at each parcel's annual levy amount is Balance to Levy / Totol SFE Benefit Units in District = Assessment Amount Per Benefit Unit City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$GlConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

each parcel is assigned 0.83 benefit unit (SFE) and Zone C each parcel is assigned 0.50 benefit unit (SFE.) Properties in Zone B and Zone C receive lower benefit units because they currently pay for common open space areas within their zone. ln2OO7, when the American River Canyon North District No. 3 was formed, an analysis of the associated landscaping improvements was performed to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. lt was estimated that Zone B receives L7% of the special benefit, and Zone C receives 5O% of the special benefit.

Therefore, the SFE units for Zone B and Zone C have been adjusted accordingly.

American River Canyon North properties are assessed per Assessment Table 4, below:

Assessment Table 4
Description SFEs
Zone A - Original ARCN Area 1.0000
Zone B - Canyon Falls Village Area 0.8300
Zone C-ARCN No.2 Area 0.5000
Broadstone
According to the Broadstone Landscaping and Lighting "Method of Spread," there are 895.301 assessable acres in Broadstone. Of these, 416.1.455 acres are divided into 1,682 single family residential lots (4.2 lots per acre average) and 479.156 acres are divided into multi-family and commercial lots. The multi-family parcels are APN 0721070002 through APN 0721070100 are known as Bentley Square West (99 units); and APN 0721610001 through APN 072161053 are known as Bentley Square East (53 units), [ln addition to these properties listed in the "Method of Spread," other multi-family complexes are also assessed, including Vessona, Sherwood, Haildon.] Although these projects were designed as single family small lot divisions, the density is consistent with the multi-family land use designation. These projects are consistent with both the MultiFamily Low Density General Plan Land Use Designation (MLD) and the Multi-Family zoning (RM_pD) of the project site. There are 1530 single family residential lots and each one is assigned 1 SFEs. There are 312,555 developed, non-single family acres and each is assigned 2.1 SFEs per acre [This is the rate applied to commercial properties, as implicitly indicated in the Method of Spreadl. (4,2 units * 0.5). Unrecorded singlefamily residentiallots are assigned.65 SFEs' There are 134.387undeveloped, non-single family residential acres and each one with be assigned

0.704 SFEs per acre. (4.2 units *.0.5 * 0.335). There are 152 lots with Bentley Square East and West and each is assigned .0962 SFEs per lot.

Broadstone properties are assessed per Assessment Table 4, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Table 5
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Multi-Family Parcels, per unit 0.0962
Developed Non-Single Family, per acre 2.L000
Undeveloped Non-Single Family, per acre 0.7040
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Broadstone No.3
There are 559.36 acres in Broadstone No. 3. Of these, 325 acres are single family residential lots (2.034lots per acre average) and 11.48 acres are divided into multi-family residential and 26.93 acres are non-assessed for use as parks, open space, etc. There are 382 single family residential lots and each one is assigned L SFE. There are 28.09 developed, non-single family residential acres and each one is assigned 2.034 SFEs per acre, There are 283 undeveloped, single family lots and each one is assigned 0,326 SFEs. There are I7L.7L undeveloped, non-single family residential acres and each one is assigned 0.326 x 2.034 SFEs.

Broadstone No.3 properties are assessed per Assessment Table 5, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 6
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Single Family Parcel 0.3260
Developed Non-Single Family, per acre 2.0340
Undeveloped Non-Single Family, per acre 0.6630
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Broadstone No. 4
Residential
Certain residential properties in the Assessment District that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned one Single Family Equivalent or 1,0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single family residential property. lf there is more than one single family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged one SFE per single family detached dwelling.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties.

These properties benefit from the lmprovements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit. The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing the Assessment District, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2010 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2S1 persons occupy each single family residence, whereas an average of 2.L2 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2'91 people on averige for a single family residence and 2.12 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.40 per dwelling unit. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types.

Commercial
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property. The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties.
ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (the "SANDAG Study") are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24.
ln comparison, the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2'91.

Since the average lot size for a single family home in the Assessment District is approximately 0'20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 1-4.55.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The employee density per acre is generally 1.65 times the population density of single family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / 14.55 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefit to commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between 1 resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. Table 2 below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category.

Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres.
lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate' Vacant
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other Properties
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests, Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed, ln 2015, when the Broadstone No.4 was formed, an analysis was performed of the associated lighting and landscaping improvements to determine the relative benefit to each zone from this new assessment. As a result, four Zones of Benefit were created within Broadstone No. 4. Parcels in Zone B are determined to receive 9525% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 93.87% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A, and parcels in Zone D are determined to receive 92.23% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A.

Broadstone No. 4 properties are assessed per Assessment Table 4, below:

Assessment Table 7
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.00
Multi-Family Parcels, per unit (2 to 4 units) 0.27
Multi-Family Parcels, per unit (5+ units) o.22
Condo 0.40
Mobile Home (separate lot) 0.20
Commercial, shopping center 0.50
Office 'J..42
Vacant 0.25
Briggs Ranch
There are 642 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE). Undeveloped residential parcels APN: 071-1190-007, 008, 010, 011 and 012 are assessed based on 2.2 SFEs per acre,
Briggs Ranch properties are assessed per Assessment Table 6, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Table 8
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Undeveloped Single Family, per acre 2.2000
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Folsom Heights
There are 288 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE.) APN 071-1050-050 is assessed 4.1 SFEs per acre.

Folsom Heights properties are assessed per Assessment Table 7, below, as per the original formation documents:

Assessment Table 9
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1_.0000
Undevelirped Single Family, per acre 4.L000
Multi Family, per unit 0.5000
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Natoma Station
There are \272single family residential lots and each one is assigned 1SFEs. There are 94.99 acres of Commercial and each one is assigned .6299 SFEs per acre. There are 21.03 acres of Multi Family and each one is assigned3.2337 SFEs per acre.

Natoma Station properties are assessed per Assessment Table 8, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Table 10
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Commercial outside of Lot X, per acre 0.6299
Commercial inside of Lot X, per acre 4.2487
Multi Family, per acre 3.2337
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Prospect Ridge
Residential
Certain residential properties in the Assessment District that contain a single residential dwelling unit are assigned one Single Family Equivalent or L.0 SFE. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category of single family residential property. lf there is more than one single family detached dwelling on a parcel, it will be charged one SFE per single family detached dwelling.

Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties, These properties benefit from the lmprovements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit. The population density factors for the area in Sacramento County encompassing the Assessment District, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties. Using the total population in a certain property type in the area from the 2010 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2S1persons occupy each single family residence, whereas an average of 2.12 persons occupy each condominium. The ratio of 2.91 people on average for a single family residence and 2.L2 people per dwelling unit in a condominium unit results in a population density equivalent of 0.73 for condominiums. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a condominium, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.40 per dwelling unit. A similar calculation is used for the SFE Rates for other residential property types.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The single family equivalency factor of 0.22 per dwelling unit for multifamily residential properties of 5 or more units applies to such properties with 20 or fewer units. Properties in excess of 20 units typically offer on-site recreational amenities and other facilities that tend to offset some of the benefits provided by the improvements. Therefore the benefit for properties in excess of 20 units is determined to be 0,22 SFE per unit for the first 20 units and 0.10 SFE per each additional unit in excess of 20 dwelling units.

Commercial/lndustrial Properties
SFE values for commercial and industrial land uses are based on the equivalence of special benefit on a land area basis between single family residential property and the average commercial/industrial property. The SFE values for various commercial and industrial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously can be measured by the average number of people who work at commercial/industrial properties.
ln order to determine employee density factors, the findings from the San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (the "SANDAG Study") are used because these findings were approved by the State Legislature as being a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties, As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24.
ln comparison, the average number of people residing in a single family home in the area is 2.91.

Since the average lot size for a single family home in the Assessment District is approximately 0.20 acres, the average number of residents per acre of residential property is 14.55.

The employee density per acre is generally 1.65 times the population density of single family residential property per acre (24 employees per acre / L4.55 residents per acre). Therefore, the average employee density can be used as the basis for allocating benefit to commercial or industrial property since a commercial/industrial property with 4.8 employees receives generally similar special benefit to a residential property with 1 resident. This factor of equivalence of benefit between 1 resident to 4.8 employees is the basis for allocating commercial/industrial benefit. Table 2 below shows the average employees per acre of land area or portion thereof for commercial and industrial properties and lists the relative SFE factors per quarter acre for properties in each land use category.

Commercial and industrial properties in excess of 5 acres generally involve uses that are more land intensive relative to building areas and number of employees (lower coverage ratios). As a result, the benefit factors for commercial and industrial property land area in excess of 5 acres is determined to be the SFE rate per quarter acre for the first 5 acres and the relevant SFE rate per each additional acre over 5 acres.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

lnstitutional properties that are used for residential, commercial or industrial purposes are also assessed at the appropriate residential, commercial or industrial rate.

Vacant Properties
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property, An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other Properties
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

Prairie Oaks Ranch
There are 856 residential lots and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE). There is one multifamily parcel and it is being assessed 57 SFEs. There is one proposed school site and it is being assessed 5.62 SFEs, or the cost of maintaining its' frontage.

Prairie Oaks Ranch properties are assessed per Assessment Table 9, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Table 11
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel 1.0000
Proposed School Site, Per Parcel 5.6300
Multi Family, per unit 1.0000
Non Assessed (e.g. open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
The proposed assessments will provide additional maintenance and servicing of existing improvements that will clearly confer special benefits to properties in the Assessment District.

The allocation of special benefits to pioperty is partially based on the type of property and the size of property. These benefits can also partially be measured by the occupants on property in the Assessment District because such parcel population density is a measure of the relative benefit a parcel receives from the improvements. lt should be noted that many other types of "traditional" assessments also use parcel population densities to apportion the assessments, For example, the assessments for sewer systems, roads and water systems are typically allocated based on the population density of the parcels assessed. Therefore, the apportionment of benefit is reasonably based the type of parcel, the size of parcels and the population density of parcels.

The primary step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single-family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single Family Equivalents (SFE).

This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments, For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are designated an SFE value, which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single-family home on one parcel. ln this case, the "benchmark" property is the single-family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent or one SFE that currently total to 899.4' Moreover, a fixed or flat assessment for all commercial properties of similar type was deemed to be inappropriate because larger commercial properties receive a higher degree of benefit than other similarly used properties that are significantly smaller. (For two properties used for commercial purposes, there is clearly a higher benefit provided to the larger property in comparison to a smaller commercial property because the larger property generally supports a larger building and has higher numbers of employees, customers and guests that would benefit from proximity and improved access to well maintained and improved landscaped areas. So the potential population of employees or residents is a measure of the special benefits received by the property.) Larger parcels, therefore, receive an increased benefit from the assessments.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGrouP

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Finally, the special benefits to be derived from the proposed assessments will be conferred on property and are not based on a specific property owner's use of the improvements, or a specific property owner's occupancy of property or the property owner's demographic status such as age or number of dependents. However, it is ultimately people who value the special benefits described above and use and enjoy the Assessment District's landscaped areas. ln other words, the benefits derived to property are related to the average number of people who could potentially live on, work at, or otherwise could use a property, not how the property is currently used by the present owner. Therefore, the number of people who could or potentially live on, work at or otherwise use a property is one indicator of the relative level of benefit received by a property.
ln conclusion, the Assessment Engineer determined that the appropriate method of assessment apportionment should be based on the type and use of property, the relative size of the property, its relative population and usage potential and its proximity to landscaped areas, This method is further described below.

Residential Properties
Assessment Table 12
Commercial/lndustrial Properties
Assessment Table 13
dResl(lenthl Factor Frctor
Singlc Family Rasidcnlial
Condominium
Dupla4 Tdple4 Fourplex
Mulli-Family Residenlial (5+ Unib)
MobilE Home on Separate Lot

1.00 0.73

0.77 0.72

0.58 1.00

0.58 o.42

0.30 0.43

1.00 0/,2

0.32 022
0r5
Type 6 Com mwrteHhdufiltl
Lmd Lb
Arrarirge
Emptoya{6
Fg,rActa t
SFE UnIA
per
SFE {''6
p.r
Aaro 2 Acrr AlbrS
Commerclal
Olllce
Shopping Cerit€r
Olllcc
Solf Storasr or Paillno Lot
24 68
24 24
,|

0.500 0.500

1.420 1.420

0.5@ 0.500

0.500 0.500
o.o21
Golf Courl.

Cametorlca
Agdcultun

0.80 0.10

0.05 0.033
0"004

0.002
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Vacant Properties
The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to improvements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
Zones of Benefit
As part of the engineering work for this assessment, an analysis was conducted on the relationship (inctuding proximity, level of service, etc.), between properties and the primary improvements located throughout the Assessment District. Parcels in Zone A (on Garrett Drive, Ferrera Drive and Whitmer Drive) receive direct special benefit from the proximate landscaping and trees adjacent to the properties as well as less proximate streetlighting. Parcels in Zone B receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting as well as landscaping particularly along the street entrances into the neighborhood. Zone C receive direct special benefit from the proximate streetlighting but lees benefit from the landscaping because they are less proximate to the landscaped areas.

Thus, three zones (A, B, and C) were created as shown on the assessment diagram. Parcels in Zone A are determined to receive same level of the level of special benefit of those within Zone B and parcels in Zone C are determined to receive 92.08% of the level of special benefit of those within Zone A and Zone B.

The SWA decision indicates:
ln a well-drawn district - limited to only parcels receiving special benefits from the improvement - every parcelwithin that district receives a shored special benefit. Under section 2, subdivision (i), these benefits can be construed as being general benefits since they are not "porticular and distinct" and are not "over and above" the benefits received by other properties "located in the district."
We do not believe thot the voters intended to involidate on assessment district that is narrowly drown to include only properties directly benefiting from an improvement, lndeed, the ballot materials reflect otherwise. Thus, if on assessment district is narrowly drawn, the fact that o benefit is conferred throughout the district does not make it general rother than speciol. ln that circumstonce, the charocterization of o benefit moy depend on whether the parcel receives o direct odvontoge from the improvement (e.9., proximity to City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

park) or receives an indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overoll public benefits of the improvement (e.g., general enhancement of the district's property values). ln the Assessment District, the advantage that each parcel receives from the lmprovements is direct, and the boundaries are narrowly drawn to include only parcels that benefit from the assessment. Therefore, the even spread of assessment throughout each narrowly drawn Zone of Benefit is indeed consistent with the SVIA decision and satisfies the "direct relationship to the "locality of the improvement" standard.

Residential Properties
Assessment Table 14
Commercial/lndustrial Properties
Assessment Table 15
Vacant Properties
The benefit to vacant properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties; however, at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. The SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
Pop. Densily
Eoufualent
SqFt Proposed
Tune of Resklentlal Proosrtv Frctor Rate
Single Fanily Residential
Condominium
Duplex Triplex Foutplex
lvlulli-Fanily Residential {5+ Units}
Mobih Home on Separate Lot
1"00
0"73
064
0"64
s.45

1.00 0.55

0.42 0.34

0.45 1.00

0.40 0.2t

0.22 0.20
l},oe ol @ m merd t,ilnd us';ilal
L' dUgn
Avrage
Emptoyeos
ftr Aert I
SFE Unlt SFE Unirc
par per
Quarter Aqre ' Acre After 6
CommcrcEl
Oficc
Shopflng Ccntsr
Office
Sclf Storaoc or Prkino Lc[
24 68
24 ?.1
1 0.s00

1..120

0.500

0.500

0.021

0. s00

1.420

0.500

0.500

0.80 0.10

0.05 Cemeleries
gricdturE

0.004

0.002
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similartype developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to lmprovements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the County of Sacramento found that approximately 25% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. lt is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 25% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 75% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.25 per parcel.

Other Properties
Article XlllD stipulates that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

All properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Other publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Miscellaneous, public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific enhancement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

Willow Creek Estates South
There are 1102 residential lots in Village L, 2, 3 (lots 41-93 and 155-165), 4-7 and 9A and each one is assigned 1 benefit unit (SFE.) There are 243 residential lots in Village 8 and 9b and each one is assigned 1.086 benefit unit (SFE). There are 54 residential lots in Village 3 (lots 41-93 and 155- L65), and each one is assigned 1.256 benefit unit (SFE). There are L0 Lexington Business Park parcels and they are assessed at 0.6L8 SFEs per parcel. There are 3 Lexington Square parcels and they are assessed at2.47tO SFEs per parcel.

Willow Creek Estates South properties are assessed per Assessment Table L0, below, as per the original formation documents:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Table 16
Description SFEs
Single Family Parcel Village 1,2,3 (lots 4L-93 and 155-165),4-7 and9A 1.0000 Single Family Parcel Village 8 and 9b 1.0870
Single Family Parcel Village 3 (lots 41-93 and 155-165 ) 1.2550 Business Park Parcel 0.6180
Commercial Parcel 2.47L0
Non Assessed (e.g, open space, park land etc.) 0.0000
Other Property TyPes
public right-of-way parcels, well, reservoir or other water rights parcels, limited access open space parcels, watershed parcels and common area parcels typically do not generate employees, residents, customers or guests. Moreover, many of these parcels have limited economic value and, therefore, do not benefit from specific lmprovement of property value. Such parcels are, therefore, not specially benefited and are not assessed.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SCtGoncultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom, County of Sacramento, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 7972 and Article XlllD of the California Constitution (collectively "the Act"), initiated the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts;
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom directed the undersigned Engineer of Work to prepare and file a report presenting an estimate of costs, a diagram for the Districts and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements upon all assessable parcels within the Districts, to which the description of said proposed improvements therein contained; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City of Folsom, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of said improvements, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the Districts.

The amount to be paid for said improvements and the expense incidental thereto, to be paid by the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts for the fiscal year 2022-23 is generally as follows:

Summary Cost Estimates
lmprovement Costs
lncidentalCosts
Other Costs
s2,540,3t3.17
S3gg,+oz.ts
S782,ooo.oo
Total lmprovement costs $3,721,715.31
As required by the Act, an Assessment Diagram is hereto attached and made a part hereof showing the exterior boundaries of said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts. The distinctive number of each parcel or lot of land in the said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts is its Assessor Parcel Number appearing on the Assessment Roll.

And I do hereby assess and apportion said net amount of the cost and expenses of said improvements, including the costs and expenses incident thereto, upon the parcels and lots of land within said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by each parcel or lot, from the improvements, and more particularly set forth in the Cost Estimate and Method of Assessment hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
gClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The assessments are made upon the parcels or lots of land within the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts in proportion to the special benefits to be received by the parcels or lots of land, from said improvements.

The Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American Canyon ll Annexation to the Residences at American River Canyon, Cobble Ridge, Broadstone 3, and Natoma Valley, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Prospect Ridge are subject to an annual adjustment tied to the Consumer Price lndex for the San Francisco Area, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 4% and American River Canyon North 3, Blue Ravine No.2, Folsom Heights No, 2, and Prairie Oaks Ranch No.2 are subject a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 3%.

Any change in the CPI in excess of the maximum annual increase shall be cumulatively reserved as the "Unused CPl" and shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less lhan 4% for Sierra Estates, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American Canyon ll Annexation to the Residences at American River Canyon, Cobble Ridge, Broadstone 3, and Natoma Valley, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Prospect Ridge; and is less than 3% for American River Canyon North 3, Blue Ravine No. 2, Folsom Heights No. 2 and Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2.

The proposed assessments for the Districts that are eligible for the CPI increase will be assessed at the rate used in fiscal year 202L-2022 but are less than the maximum authorized rates.

Broadstone No.4 and Willow Creek East Estates No. 2 will be assessed at the maximum authorized rate for fiscal year 2022-23.

District
Authorized
Rate
Proposed
Rate22-23
American River Canyon North No. 3 s294.90 s269.86
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 s232.s0 s2t3.26
Broadstone 3 s38.83 528.07
Broadstone No.4-Zone A s39.e8 s3e.s8
Broadstone No.4-Zone B s38.06 s38.06
Broadstone No. 4-Zone C Sst.sz Ssz.sz
Broadstone No. 4-Zone D s36.S0 s36.80
Cobble Ridge s227.73 s139.64
Folsom Heiehts No.2 s227.70 s208.38
Natoma Valley s972.56 s8s6.37
Prospect Ridge 5t,220.87 51,173.86
Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 Sszs.sz 5323.32
The Residences 5722.63 SSa0.6Z
The Residences ll 51,499.93 5r,169.97
Sierra Estates 5413.02 5363.68
Willow Creek East Eastates No 2-Zone A&B s1o3.s1 s103.s1 Willow Creek East Eastates No 2-Zone C sgs.rs s9s.1s
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23
SClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Silverbrook is subject to an annual assessment for StaZ.SZ. However, there will be a credit in 2022-23 due to sufficiency of fund balance for current maintenance needs.

On April 9, 201.3 by Resolution No. 9137, the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District was dissolved. The City will no longer be responsible for maintain the improvements nor providing services within the Fieldstone Meadows Landscaping and Lighting District.

Union Square a benefit zone of Natoma Station will be maintained and serviced by their Home Owner's Association and has not been levied since fiscal year 2009-10.

Each parcel or lot of land is described in the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Sacramento for the fiscal year 2022-23. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office ofthe County Recorder of said County.

I hereby place opposite the Assessor Parcel Number for each parcel or lot within the Assessment Roll, the amount of the assessment for the fiscal year 2022-23 for each parcel or lot of land within the said City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Dated: April 2022
I
Engineer Work
John W. Bliss, License No. C52091
c 52091
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Assessment Diagram
The boundaries of the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts are displayed on the following Assessment Diagram.

The specific lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel are on file at the City.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGtColrultlngOrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

American
River
Canyon No.3 ^^,
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIry CLERK OF THE

CITY OF FOLSOM, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
CAL|FORN|A,THIS _ DAY OF
2022.

NORTH CIry CLERK
American
River
Canyon No.2
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERKOF THECITY OF FOLSOM, COUNry OF SACRAMENTO, CAL|FORNTA, THIS _DAY OF _,2022.

Willow Creek
East Estates No. 2
Zone A
Zone BZoneC

CITY CLERK
The

AN ASSESSMENT WAS CONFIRMED AND LEVIED
BY THE CIry COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOLSOI/ON THE LOTS, PIECES AND PARCELS OF LAND ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM at American River Canyon ON THE DAY OF 2022 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 AND D

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR WERE FILED IN THEOFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF THE COUNryOF SACMMENTO ON THE-DAY OF2022. REFERENCE IS HEREBY I,,IADE TO SAID

RECORDED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE EXACT
AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIEDAGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND. Lake Natoma
Shores CITY CLERK

FTLED THIS
_
DAY OF
_, 2022,ATTHEHOUROF O'CLOCK
-.

M. IN THE OFFICE OFTHE COUNry
AUDITOR OF THE COUNry OF SACRAMENTO,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT THE REQUEST OF
THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CIry OF FOLSOM.@eruro
Pairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
Prospect Ridge Note:

REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE I\,IAPS AND DEEDSOF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR OF THECOUNTY OF SACRAMENTO FORA DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF

THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ANY PARCELS SHOWN
HEREIN. THOSE MAPS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS
CONCERNING THE LINES AND DII,IENSIONS OF SUCH PARCELS.

EACH PARECL IS IDENTIFIED IN SAID MAPS BY ITS
DISTINCTIVE ASSESSORS'S PARCEL NUMBER.

Sierra Eslates

CITY OF FOLSOM

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
River
Hannaford
Cross
Natoma Valley
J / *-----/
* Brisss ll --l Ranch I
Hills Il
CobbleRidge
FolsomHeights
& Folsom
BlueRavineOaks
Blue
Ravine
Oaks
No.2 No.2 Willow Creek South
Bro#one
|.1o. I &2and No.4 3
Willow
SCI Con$ltng Group4745 Mangeb Blvd
Fairfield, cA945g7074304300 Page 234
05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Appendix A -- Budgets
The attached budgets for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are included for each of the Districts Category Descriptions
Fund Balance Calculation:

This calculation determines funds available in a district. This calculation includes the included funds remaining after being allocated to the estimated reserve.

Estlmated Reserves
Estimated Reserve to finance approximately 6 months of the following year: This is approximately 45% of the operating and incidental costs of a Landscaping and Lighting District to fund the operations until collected revenue is received from the County.

Short-Term lnstallments
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within the next five years.

Long-Term Installments
Funds listed here are monies collected in prior years and set aside for future proposed improvements projected to be completed within five to thirty years.

Improvement Costs
General Maintenance Costs
Scheduled: monthly landscape maintenance and service
Unscheduled: unscheduled but potential costs for repairs (i.e. broken sprinklers and irrigation systems), replacements (i.e. remove and replace dead tree or irrigation controller), and other services (i.e. repair fence post or treat for a specific pest) not included in monthly maintenance and service costs
Streetlights: repair and replace bulbs and ballasts in streetlights City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Service Costs
. Electrical: electric costs for streetlight maintenance and power to irrigation controllers r Water: water costs to irrigate landscaping
Current Year Improvement Projects
Funded improvements planned to occur in the upcoming fiscal year lncidental Costs
. professional Services: consultant cost for Engineer's Report and lmprovement Plan . Contract Services: other contracts or professional services such as backflow testing (yearly tests), vector control, graffiti removal, and streetlight pole replacement ' publications/Mailings/Communications: yearly notices in public hearings, mailings to Advisory Committee Members, and telephone expenses
. Staff: Landscaping and Lighting District Manager and/or inspector, clerical support, and/or other citY staff.
. Overhead: General overhead (Landscaping and Lighting Districts' share of general overhead categories such as city clerk, city Attorney, city Manager, etc.) and Department overhead (Landscaping and Lighting Districts' share of department overhead categories such as City Attorney, City Clerk and Finance Dept' Costs). r County Auditor Fee: Per Parcel Fee charged by County to put levy on tax bills Total lmprovement Costs
This is the total of all improvement costs budgeted for the upcoming year. This cost includes current improvements that are funded by fund balance monies. Fund balance monies are monies that have been collected in prior years in anticipation of being used for specific improvements and/or intended for replacement or improvement of capital items within a district.

Assessment to PropertY (Current)
This calculation takes the number of single-family equivalent benefit units and multiplies it by the amount that each property within a district is will be assessed for the upcoming year, This is the total assessment amount that will be generated by the properties within the District.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

District Balance
The purpose of this calculation is to describe all costs expected to occur in the upcoming year, any installments being collected as part of the upcoming year's assessment and contributions from other sources. The outcome of the calculation is the total assessment for the district. A surplus would be applied and/or credited to the upcoming year's assessment. lf there are insufficient funds in the fund balance to cover the 6-month reserve, or the current and/or proposed improvements, then a deficit would exist. A deficit generally indicates that an increase in assessment may be necessary (requiring voter approval with a simple majority), however there may be a one-time reason for the deficit and an increase may not be necessary. Deficit situations are reviewed and analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

Net Assessment Calculation
This calculation determines the net assessment after the surplus or deficit is factored into the calculation. lf a deficit exists, the net assessment will indicate that the assessment for the district might be too low. lf a surplus exists, the net assessment will indicate that the assessment for the district might be too high. Any increased adjustments require voter approval (simple majority).

Allocated Net Assessment to Property
This calculation takes the net assessment for the district that was calculated above (i.e. factoring in a surplus or deficit) and divides it by the number of single-family equivalent benefit units. The outcome of the calculation is the total allocated net assessment per single-family equivalent benefit unit. This calculation is generally the same as the allocated assessment however if there is a deficit it will indicate the revised amount that would be required to eliminate the deficit.

Conversely if there is a surplus the calculation would show the amount that the assessment could be reduced by and still cover the anticipated costs for current and future years.

Comparison of Net Assessment and Assessment
Shows a comparison of the net assessment and the current assessment and indicates a per parcel deficit or surplus.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stortlng Fund Bolonce (ds of Aptil 2022)
Estlmoted ReseNe to linance opprcx. fl6tG months of 22-23 sx06,204.19
(s46,981.82)
Clty of Folsom
american Rlv€r Nonh LandscapinS and LiShtlng Olstrld
Fund 253
2022-2t
General Maintenance 6*s

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled'

3. Streetlights'

4. lrigatlon
So.oo
s0.00
s5,5OO.O0
s11"0OO.OO
Sedlae Cofs

5. Electdcal* s3O,OOO.O0
s3s,oo0.o0
Current Year lmplovehent Prolects

7. slgn rehab, ladder fuel removal s55,000.0O
[email protected]
Subtotal s16,[email protected]
a. Protesslonal Seilices (Enslnee/s Repon and lP)

9. Contract Seruices (all other cont€cts and seruices)*

10. Publlcations/Maillngs/communicatlons

11. Staff

12. overhead

13. County Auditor Fee
sTso.oo
so.oo
so.oo
So.oo
S4966.o0
9s93.s4
subtotal
Total hprovement 6$s
363W
s15a809.54
Assessment per Slngle Famlly Equlvalent
Slngle Family Eqllvalent Eeneflt Unlts
Total Assessment
s7o2.94
I,O22
s10s,2o4,5s
Shon-Term lnstallm€nt Plan (previously collect€d)
Long-Term lnstallmeht Plan (previously collected)
Short-Term lnstallment Plan {collected rhis year)
Lona-Term lnstallment Plan (collected thls year)
9o.oo
$1469s.O0
So.oo
So.oo
s146es.m
s1O5,204.58
Total lmprcvement Cosb
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total lnstallment cosb
contdbutions Ircm other sources
N€t Balance
(s152,809.54)
(s47,604.861
5s9,222.37
s11,617.51
(s1469s.00)
5o.oo
ls3,o77.4el
Dlnrlct Balahce (.urplus ls +; defclt l5 (ll (93,or7.49) 5los,204.68
53,o7r.49
9LOA,2a2.r7
Surplus o. Dellclt (surplus is subt€cted; deficit is added) Allocated N€t As*sment to Propeftv
Net tusessment
Single Famlly Equivalent Benefit Unlts
Allocated Net Ssessment to Propety
itoa,za2.L7
lo22
s105.95
Gmoarlson of Net Atsesm€nt ahd As$ment
Allocated Net A$e$ment to ProP€ftY
Allo.ated A$essment to PropertY
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or Deficlt (-)
(S1o5.9s)
s102.94
(S3'or)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGoneultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

American River Canyon North - lnstallment Summary
District: American River Canyon North
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) S6s.179
short Term lnstallment summary
Totals: So $o So s0 So s0 s0 So
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Waterfall Pond Liner (concrete and other) s1.200 s14.69s S3.333 S13.333 S16,667 S33,333 s33.333 s100.000 Waterfall pumps, autofill, filters, clorination system S2.soo s10.000 s12.500 S2s,ooo s25.000 STs,ooo Totals: s1.200 S14.69s ss.833 S23,333 529,L67 So so s17s.000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGoncultlngQraup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stortlng Fund Bdldnce (as of Aptil 2022)
Estlmoted ReseNe tofinance opprcx.Jitst6 months of 22-23 s16A,61A,22
(S5,ss1.82)
CW of Folson
Amedcah Rlver Canyon Nonh No. 2 Landscaplngand LiShtlng Distrid Fund 2tO - lights Ohly
2022-23
mprovemeht 6is
GeneEl Maint€nance &is

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. StreeilighB
so.oo
so.o0
S3qooo.oo
Servlce 6$5

4. Electdcal Sx,ooo.oo
9o.oo
cuirent Year lnorovement Proiects

6. LED conv€Bion s2s,oo0.oo
S2'OOO.OO _
Ss6,om.oo
ncldental6ns

7. Professlonal Serulces (EnSineer's Repon and lP)
a. ContFct Sedices (all olher contEcts and services)

9. Publications/Mailings/communications

10. sbff

11. Overhead

12. countyAudltorFee
$7so.oo
$o.oo
So,oo
So.oo
s63X.00
S94.40
subtotal s1y'7s.€
Total lmprovem€nt Co$s 5s7,47sfi
q$e$mcnt to Prooedv lcurrentl
tusessment per Slngle Famlly Equlvalent
slngle Famlly Equlvalent Benefit unib
577.7o
160
st2,432-@
nsallment 6ss lsce lniallment Plan and Sumhafl hen parel shon-Term lnstallment Plan (previously coll€cted)
tong-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Sho(-Tem lnstallment PIan (collected this year)
tong-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnsallm€nt kns
So.oo
s2O3,688.O0
So.oo
s16,O0O-00
s219,688.OO
Dlirlct galance
$L2,432.oo
Total lmprovement cosB
Subtobl
Total available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Costs
contributions frcm oth€r sources
Net Balance
lssT,47s.41
(945,043.40)
s153,055.40
s118,O23.00
($219,588.0o)
So.oo
(s1OL66s.00)
Di*rict Balance (surplus ls +; deflclt ls ()) (S101,65s.ool {€t Assrment Glculatlon
512,432.6
surplus or Deflclt (surplus Is subtmcted; deficlt is added) s1o1,655.m 9114o97.m
Allocated Net Asssment to Prooedv
NetAsessment
Single Family Equlvalent Benefit UniB
Allocated Net tusessment to Property
9114,G7.@
S713.11
bmoarlon of Net A$e$ment and Asessment
Allocated Net Asse$ment to Propedy
Allocated A$esm6nt to Propedy
P€r Parc€l SurFlus (+l or Deflclt Gl
(S713.11)
577,7o
(s63s.41)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

American River Canyon North No. 2' lnstallment Summary
District: American River Canyon North #2 ilishts)
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) sL70,458
Short Term lnstallment Summary
$o $o SO so $o So $o Totals: $o
[ons Term lnstallment Summary
Ss7.s87 S2,ooo S8,ooo Slo.ooo s20,000 s2o,ooo s60.000 Paint 250 S66.101 s8,000 s40.000 s80,000 s80,000 s240,000 Pole Replacement s8,000 s32,ooo s123,688 Slo,ooo 340.000 ss0,000 Sloo,ooo 3100.000 s300,000 fotals: Slo,ooo 't:,:: '\'
i 1; ,;;; jixrl: rr ,. ir",' :r''rl
, :., \l ::'
!:," .
.
'r:i j'rrr"
',/t:,'.
i.,lil
!, ij ,rf
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022-23
sclConcultlngGtuup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
starting Fund Balonce (os of Apfl 2022)
Estimated ReKNe to linance apptox litst 6 months of 22-23 sl,O71,292,OL
(s110,818.77)
a. Professional Sedices (Engineer's Repot and lP)

9. Cont6ct Seruices (all othercontracts and seruices)

10. Publications/Mailinas/Communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. county Audltor Fee
subtotal
Total lmprovement Costs
Generdl Maintenance 6is
Subtotal 92so,m.@ _
' s373,5@.@
9250,mo.00

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetliahts

4. lriiSation Pads
s75O.O0
So.oo
so,oo
S15,351.o0
95,387.0o
ss42,s4
s22,030.s4
$39s,63O.s4
97o,ooo.oo
s50,0O0.00
So'oo
S3,3oo.oo
s300.0o
So.oo
serulce G*3

5. Electrical
current Yeer lmblovement Prolects

7. LandscapelmprcvemenB
Assessm€nt per slngle Famlly Equivalent
Single Family Equlvalent Beneflt Units
Total Asse$ment $2Q,L52.45
5259.85
919.56
Short-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (previoualy collectedl
short Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this vear)
Total ln*allment costs s759,m.00
512a,000.o0
9s97,mo.oo
$12,ooo.oo
s32,O0O.OO
Tdtal Ass€ssment
Total lmprovement Cosb
subtotal
Total Available Funds
Annual lnstallment (collected thls year)
contdbutions from other sources
N€t Balance
524a,L52.46
(S3ss.63o.s4)
{5L47 ,47a.oa)
sgOO,473.24
s752,99s.!6
{s76s,o0o.o0)
so.o0
(S16.0o4.84)
Dl$rlct ($16,004.84) Balance (surplus is +; detlclt 15 ()l Sumlus or Deficit {surplus is subtracted; d€ficit is add€d) 528,1s2.46
s16,m4.&
s26,157.30
CltY ot Folsom
Amerlcan Riv€r Canvon Nonh No. 3 Landsapln8 and Lighting Dlitrlat Fund 275
2022-2t
Allocated Net Ase$m€nt to Prooertv
Net Assessment
Single Family Equivalent Ben€fft Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
s264,r57.tO
920
52a7.26
Gmparison of Net Assessment and Asse$ment
Allocated Net Asessment to PJopety
Allocated As*$ment to PtoPedY
Per Parcel Sutplus (+l or Detlclt (,
152a7,251
-ls
(Su'4o)
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

American River Canyon North No. 3 - lnstallment Summary Amerlcan North S3 Dlstrlct:
2022-21
s1,078,365 Ba
short Term lnstallment SummarY
s1s.000
Controller
s60,000
s2s.000
Hills
3o s0 So s100.000 So s0 So So
I dnr Tcrm lnstallment Summarv
STs.ooo
Rock
9350,ooo Path
s300.000
and s13s.000
Falls
band
s150.000
tn Trail
s0 So 5o s1.010,000 $o So So $o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's RePort, FY 2022-23
SCtGoncultlngGrpup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stodlns Fund Bolance lasofApill 2022)
Estimdted Reserye tolinance approx. fl6t 6 months of 22-23 SLoo,274.5a
(s16,107.s3)
motovement 6d3
ceneral Malnt€nance ftsls

1. scheduled

3. streetlishB
So.oo
So.oo
s1,2OO.OO
seruiae Co*s

4. Electrical s4OOO.O0
s12,sOO.OO
Current Y€ar lmorovement Prol€cts

5. No Planned Projects so.oo
subtotol of l@m 6 so.oo _
s17,7OO.OO
lncidental osts

7. Professional seruices (Englneer's Report and lP)

8. contcctservlces (all othercontracB andserulces)

9. Publ icatl ons/Ma i I i ngs/communica tl ons

10. Stalf

11. Overhead

12. Couhty Audltor Fee
s7s0.o0
So.oo
$o.o0
So.oo
s1"496.OO
S97.35
subtoral 52,343,t5
Total lmprovement &ss s2O,O43.35
Assssment to Propenv (Current)
Assessment per single Famlly Equlvalent
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
TotalAsssment
$218.60
155
$36,069.OO
lnsallment 6*i {ee ln*allment Plan and sunmaru nes oalel Shod-Tem lnsbllment plan (previously collected)
Long-Teh lnstallment Plan (pr€viously collected)
Shod Term lnsGllment Plan (coll€cted thls year)
Lone-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnstillm€nt 6*5
s11,O0O.00
So.oo
S1,ooo.oo
so.00
S12,om.oo
Diirict Balance
Total Assessment
Tohl lmprovement Costs
subtotal
Total Avallable Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contdbutions frcm dher sources
Net Balance
s36,069.00
(S20,043.3s)
s16,02s.65
S84167.os
s1O0,192.70
(s12,OOO.0O)
So.oo
$aa,192.7O
Dlsllct Balance (surplus ls +; denclt ls 0) 9S,192.7O
{et A$E$m€nt Glculation
Surplus or Deficit (surplus is subt€cted; deficit is added) Net Asessment
936,059.00
_19j9,gz9l
l$s2,L23.7o1
(552,t23,701
155
(s31s.9Ol
Clty of Folsom
Blue Ravlne oaks bndscaplnS and LightinS Oiitrid
Fund 2SO
2022-23
AlloEat€d Net asse$ment to Propertv
Net Asessment
Slngl€ Famlly Equivalent Beneflt Units
Allocated Net tusessment to Propefty
&mparlson of Net As*sment and Asse$ment
s31s.90
s2$.50
S5il.5o
Allocated Assessnent to Propeny
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or Deff.lt G)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Blue Ravine Oaks - Installment Summary
Blue Ravine Oaks District: (The Shores)
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance s108.044
Short Term Installment Summary
So so s0 So so s0 SO fotals: so
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
ss.000 S5,ooo ss0,000 Ss.ooo Ss,ooo 5s,ooo s130.000 Blue Ravine wall repair Ss,ooo $o $o s0 $o $o So $o Totals: $o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngQrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stdrting Fund Bolance (asolAptil 2022)
ktimated ReseNe to finance opprox. lhst 6 months of 22'A s183,C3-79
(51s,714.0s)
Cltyof Folsom
Blue Ravlne Oal6No. 2kndseplngand UahtlngDlstdd
Fuhd 27a
m2-23
GssEll4cidc!3&c!q!!

1. 2.
3,
scheduled
Unscheduled
streetllShts
lrrigation
s12,sm.m
Srtm.m
so.m
S13m.@
Sedce Costs

5. 6,
Electrical So.m
so,@
Current Year lmprovement Proleds

7. Drlpconve6lon/Fencereplacement 9zo,m.m
subtotatofttems Srcioolo
subtotal s€,800.m

8. Professional Services (Engineer's Report and lP)
9- Contradservices {all other contrads and serylces)

10. Publicatlons/Mailinss/communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. CountyAuditor Fee
97so,m
so,m

50.@
54,oe.@
$geo.m
s97.3s
subtotal 55,91235
Total lmprcvementCosts 9v,7L7,35
Assessment perSingle Family Equivalent
Sinale Famlly Equivalent Benefit Unlts
$273.26
165
s3s,187.$
Shod-Term lnstallm€nt plan (prevlously colleded)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colled€d)
Shod-Term lnstallment Plan (colleded this year)
Long-Term Installment Plan (colleced this yead
Total lnstallment costs
sLm.0o
$73,600.m
$o.m
59,2m.m
Sa,m.m
Total lmprovement costs
Subtotal
Total Avallable Funds
rot.l lnstallment Cost
contributions f rom othersources
Net Balance
935,187.S
(ss4,7r7,3sl
( Sxg,s29.4s)
5167,98,74
StN,w.z9
(s83,m,m)
Som
se,w.29
Distild Balance (surplus ls +; defl.ltls 0l 54,ffi.29
surplus or Deflcit (surpius ls subtradedj deflcit is added) s3s,s7.s
(Ss,ffi.zs)
(929,S2.39)
Alloeted Net &sessftent to ProEetu
N€tAssessment
Sinale Family Equivalent Benefit Unils
Allocated Net Assessment to Prope^y
(tze,62.39)
165
lsu8.$l
Comoarlson of ilet Assessment and Atsessment
Alto€ted Net Asessment to PrcPerty
Allooted Assessment to ProPerty
9178.$
528.26
P€r Paftel
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page62
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 - lnstallment Summary
Blue Ravine Oaks No.2
Fiscal Year: 2022-2t
s180,67s
Short Term lnstallment Summary
s1.000 s0 So So So s3s.000 Ravine s1,ooo So
s0 So $o s3s.000 Totals: s1,000 S1,ooo So $o
Lone Term lnstallment Summary
s1.200 s1.200 S1,2oo s1.200 s1.200 S1,2oo s6s.000 Fence Reolacement on Rilev s1,200 Sz.soo s2.s00 S2,soo s2.s00 S8o,ooo S2,soo s2.s00 S2,soo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo s4.000 cement Ssoo Ssoo $soo
s4,200 S4,20o s4.200 54,2oo S+zoo S4.2oo S4,20o s149,000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SCtOonculttngGlrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

stdrtins Fund aolonce (as olAptil 2oz)
Estimoted Reserye to linonce apptox. listG months oJ 22'23 (s19,473.4)
(s35,G1.32)
BdSsFahch hndscaplngand UghtlngOlstdd
Fund 26
2022-8
General Mainten6nce Cosb

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. streetlights

4. lrlgation
s4tm0.m
S1s,m.m
s4,5@.@
s2,m.m
Sq!!el$!g s9@.@
s8,sm.m
Curent Year lmprovement PrcleG

7. No planned projeds so.@
so.m
-
subtotal 5&,S,m
a. Professional Seruices (Engineer's Repofr and lP)

9. Contrad se ruices {a I I oth er contrads and s€ rvice s) 10 Publl€tion5/Maalinas/communications

11. staff
X2. Overhead
X3. countyAuditor Fee
S75o.m
So.m
So.m
s12,727.6
52,95s.m
s389.41
5!btotal slqa141
Total lmprevementCotB $1O1,331.41
Assessment per Single Family Equivalent
Slngle Family Equivalent Aenefit Units
5a2z.2a
[email protected]
9m,76.02
short-Term lnstallment Plan {previouslv colleded)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously collededl
shot-Term lnstallment Plan (colleded this vear)
Lons-Term lnstallment Pl€n (colleded this vear)
Ss9,m.@
s1ol8m.m
52,m.m
53,410.m
916,il.o
5S,706.02
Total lmprcvement Costs
subtotal
Total Avallabl€ Funds
Total lnstallm€ntCost
Contributlons from other sources
( s101,331.41)
( s2O,62s.38)
(Ssts14.e)
(s76,14.18)
{516,[email protected])
Som
([email protected])
olstdd Balance (surplu!ls+; dcflcltls (l) (S242,{.4}
9S,7ffi.@
Surplus or Deficit {surplus ls subtraded; deficit is added) szA,M,7A 93A,W.21
Alloded Net Assessmentto Prooeru
slA,ffi.\
single Family Equlvalent a€neflt units
Allocated Net Assessmeht to Prop€ny
ffi
s4a9.61
conpadson of Net Assessment and &s€ssment
Allocated Net Assessment to Preperty
Allocated Assessment to PrePertY
P€rParcel Surylus (+) orDetltlt(t
(5e.61)
sw,a
(ss7.33)
tFunds from fund balance
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Briggs Ranch - lnstallment Summary
Distrist: Brisps Ranch
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance {2022} (Se,3s5)
Short Term lnstallment Summarv
Shrub and tree upgrades (E. Natoma & Blue Ravine) s10.000 S17,ooo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo s50.000 Fence/Wall repair/replacement s10.000 S17.ooo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Sso,ooo Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma partiall s2.000 ss00 Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Ssoo Sso,ooo Pet Stations repair/replacement S2.ooo S6.ooo Ssoo Ssoo ss00 Ssoo Ssoo S6,ooo Iotalst s24.000 s40.s00 s2.000 S2.ooo Sz.ooo s2.000 S2,ooo s156,000 Lons Term lnstallment Summary
Bollard reoair/reolacement S2,ooo s39.020 s410 s410 s410 S41o s410 s60.000 Fence reoair/replacement (Blue Ravine Partial) S4,ooo s8.000 s500 s500 S5oo ss00 ss00 s60.000 Fence repair/replacement (E. Natoma Partial) S4,ooo S8,ooo ss00 ss00 Ssoo ss00 ss00 s60.000 Entrv Sisn Reolacement (brass letterine) s1.000 S3,soo Ssoo Ssoo ss00 ss00 ss00 s10.000 irrisation uosrades/reolacement (3 controllers) s2,000 Ss,ooo Ssoo Ssoo ss00 ss00 Ssoo s10.000 Landscaoe liehtins uosrades or replacement ss.000 S9.soo Ssoo Ssoo ss00 ss00 Ssoo s7s.000 Tree and landscape improvement (partial collection) s2,000 Ss,ooo Ssoo Ssoo ss00 ss00 ss00 s10.000 fotals: s20,000 578,o2o S3,410 S3,410 S3,410 S3,410 s3.410 s285.000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonnrltlngGtoup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Clty of Folsom
Eroaddone Landscaplng and LiShting Dlstrld
Fund 210
2022-29
Shofr-Term lnstallmentPlan (pr€viouslycolleded)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colleated)
5hort-Term lnstallment Plan (collectedthis year)
Long-T€rh lnstallment Plan (collected thls year)
Total lnstallment Costs
$o.oo
s0.00
s0.00
s0.00
So.m
Geneial Malnt€hance Costs
f=hd,hd- tz.
unscheduled

1. streetlights
Serulc€ Costs iirrdrk"l
L w"t",
cur..nt Y.ar lmorovement Prolcds

6. No Planned Projects
So.oo
$o.oo
So.m
S47,5oo,oo
$14s,ooo.oo
s0.m
Subtoul oI ltem 6 0.m _
subtotal s192,5oo,oo

11. 12.

Professionalseruices(En8in€er's Repodand IP)
Contradseruices (alloth€rcontractrandseruices)
Publications/MailinSs/Communications
Staff
GuntyAuditor F€e
STso.oo
$o.oo
$o.00
5s4909.oo
59,s76.oo
sl,391.1O
Subtotal 356,632,70
lotal lmprovement Cotts sE it?o-'-
bsessm€nt to kopefr {Cuilantl
As€ssmentperslngle FamllyEquival€nt
slngle Family Equlvalent geneflt Units
Total fuiessment
s164.99
4368.99
$390,859.65
Dlstrl.t Balance
Totalasessment
Total Improvement costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallmentcost
contrlbutlons f rom other sourc€s
Net galance
S390,859.66
{s2s9,132.70)
1131,726.96
(s286,870.29)
(s1ss,143.33)
So.oo
So.oo
(s1ss,143,331
Dlstrld Balan.€ (surplus 13+; d€ficltls 0l (9ss,14333)
surplus or Deflcit (surplus is subtrad€d; deficlt is added) Netfusessment
s390,859.66
s155,143.33
Ss46,m2.99
allocat€d flet Alsessment to ProDefu
N€tAssessment ss46,m2,99
slngle Famlly Equlvalent Beneflt unlts
Alocated Net Assessment to Paoperty
______ts69-
S230.48
Sturtlng Fund Eolonce (as olAptil 2022)
Estimated ReseNe to finance opptox. frtst 6 months of 22-23 19112,322.OO1
l$174,s4a.291
comEarlson ot Netasessment €nd fusessment
Allocat€d Net &sessoent to propenY
Allocated k€ssmEnt to ProPertY
Per Parcel surplus l+) or Deflclt G)
(s23o.s)
$16{.99
(96s.4e)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Broadstone 1 and 2 - lnstallment Summary
Dlstri.t: Broadstone
Fis6l Year: 2022-29
Fund Balance $Lrz3221
shdrt Term lnst.llment Summaru
s2s.000 rrce & I endscabe lmorovements (Dartial fund collection) s1s.000 Bollar reoair/reolacement (40)
s10.000 LiEht oole/flxture of KW
30 s0 so s0 s0 So 30 sso.o00 fdtrl.:

Lonr Term lnstallment Summaru
Reoair s50.000 irrisation/reolace shrubs lron Point median s160.000 free & landscape improvement (or replacement)
qhnrh s1.O00.000 rchle.pment - throuahout lsome irrleation reoair) 28 icres s10.000 I endscab6 lisht reolacement
S11.ooo
s40.000 sienaEe reoair/reolacement
s200.000
S45,ooo
s0 So So So So So so s1.515.000 Totals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConrultlng0roup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stortlng Fund Eolonce (os of Apdl 2022)
Esilmoted Resetue to flnonce opptox. Jitst 6 months oJ 22'23 ss1,73A.73
(s10,172.83)
city of Fobom
Broadstone 3 kndscaplng and Lightina Dlstrld
Fund 209 - Str€etllShts Only
2022-23
General Malntenance Co$s

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Str€etlights

50.m
So.oo
$12,s00,0o
Sggl!!19!!!

4. Electfrcal 52,ooo.m
So.oo
Qrrent Year lmprovement Prolects

6. LED conveEion
Subtotal
Slo,ooo.oo
subtotol oJ ltem 6 slop()m
s24,5m.m
7,

8. 9.

10. 11.

L2.

Prcfessional servlces (Eneinee/s Repon and lP)
contract seruices (all other contEds and seryices)
Publications/MalllnSs/Communicatlons
Staff
Overhead
county Audltor Fee
STso.oo

50.@
$o.0o
So.@
51,435.O0
s699.O0
subtotal 9r"88m
Total lmprovenent 6*s S27,38s.oo
Assessment per slngle Famlly Equlvalent
single Famlly Equlvalent Benefit Units
Total A$esfrent
s28.O7
811.53
922,ar9-65
shofr-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected)
shoft-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this Year)
Long-Term lnsbllment Plan (collected this year)
Total ln$allment 6is
$o.oo
ss,o00.oo

50.oo
s0.o0
9s,o@.(X'
Total Ssessment
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
Contdbutions frcm other sources
Net Balance
522,779.6s
($27,38s.00)
(s4,60s.3s)
s58,105.90
ss3,s00.ss
(Ss,ooo m)
s0.m
s48,500.55
Di*rict Balance (surplus is +; deliclt is (l) S48,[email protected] Sumlus or Deficit (surylus is subtracted; deficit is added) s22,779.53
(54,5m.ss)
lszs,7m.9ol
Allocated Net A$esfrent to Ptopedv
Net Assessment
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
(92s,72o.9O)
4 (S31.5s)
comoadson of N€t A$essment and A$esment
Allocated Net A$€snent to PropefrY
Allocated Asse$ment to Property
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or O€flclt (-l
931.59
S28.o7
ss9.76
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Broadstone 3 - lnstallment Summary
District: Broadstone #3
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s39,886
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Total $o $o $o $o So SO SO $o
Long Term lnstallment Summary
SO s1.667 s6.667 s8,333 s16.667 Sr.6.667 s50.000 Paint Streetlight Poles (350 poles) ss,ooo Total s5,ooo so sL,667 S6,667 s8.333 s16.667 s16,567 ss0,000 City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
tClOonrultlngQroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Btinaled Reseve lo finan@ apqox fr61 6 nonlhs of 22-23
(as of Aptil 2022) $166,588.00
($36,869.50)
Cily of Folsom
Broadston€ l{0.4 Landsqallng and Lightlng Dlrtrtct
Fund 282
2022.23
Asse$mentper Singl€ Family Equivalent
Singlo Family EquiElsnl B€nefil Units
Tolal Algo$nont
$39.98
2,065,05
$82,560.53
nstallfisnt Costs {8gs installmenl Plan and Summary n6xt oa!o} Shod.Tem lnstallmilt Plan (previously @ll@ted) $o.oo
$o.oo
9o.oo
$0.00
Long-T6m lnslallmenlPhn (proviously
Long-Tem lnslallmonl Pla (@llected his year)
Total lnstallmont Costs $0.00
)btrlc't Balanco
Tolal As$$menl $02,560.53
($362,710.38)
{$280,r49.85}
$'l 29,71 8.50
($150,431.35)
$0.00
$0 00
($150,431.35)
Total lmprovomenl Ccls
Sublotal
Total Availablo Funds
Tolsl Funds
Total lnslallmont Csl
Confibuljons iom other 9u@s
NotBalanm
DlstrlctBalancs(surplus ls +; dofcft ie{)} {t15q$r35)
$82,560.51
S0rplus or Deficit (su.plus is sublracted; deficjt is added) NelAssessent --Jgl3r.3!- $232,99t.88
Allocaled NotAssossmontlo Proportv
Nel Assossenl
Sinole FamilyEquiwlent Benelit Units
Allo€ted Net Assssrenl to Prop€rty
1232,991.88
1112.83
mErovgnenlCo6tB
G6neral Malhlenanco Cosls
t. srh"drr"d
?, unschoduled 73. steodiohb
?, tnigalion
SerulcsCosls
-
5, Elecln€l t6. w.t ,
$165,000.00
$15,000.00
$42,500.00
$35,000.00
curronl Year lmorovomont Paolects
t T". p.*g-
$0,00
$0,00
$90,000.00
Sublotaloflteni Ssl()m
Subtoiil 9347,500.00
lncldontal Colts --r6]-Tif*siond Seryi@s (Enginoo/s Repod and lP) t9. Confact Ssryi@s {dl olher @nbac{s and seryi@s) t10. Publi€tions/Mailings/Communi€liong lt. sratt
'12, overhead
'13, couilyAuditorFee
$750.00
$0.00
$0.00
$6,999.00
$7,040.00
$42r,38
Subtotrl
Total lmprovsmohl Costa
llqrl03s
136r,?103S
Conosrlson ot Nol Assessmnt and A3sossmonl
Allocatod Net AssessD€nt to Proporly
Allocatqd As$ssnont to Propsr{y
PorParcsl surplus (+) or Dollclt t)
($112.83)
139.98
{172'85)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGongultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Broadstone 4 - lnstallment Summary
Distrlct: Broadstone No. 4
Flsdl Ye.r: 2022-2C
Balance S166,s88
lhort Term lnstallment Summafv
s0 s0 s0 So So s0 s50.000 other interior areas So
s0 s0 s0 So So 6000 So So
s0 s0 s0 So $o ss6.000 fotal So So
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
So s0 So So So $o s0 Total 9o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonrultlngGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

PageTL
Stortlng Fund Bolonce (os ofApdl 2022)
Esilmoted ReseNe b flnonce dpprox, flEt 6 months oJ 22-23 (s12604.11)
(s19,6s4.43)
Clty of Folaoh
Cobble Hllls lllRefledions ll tandscaping and tiShtlh8 Distrid Fund 214
2022-23
lmorovement 6i3
General Malntenahce 6*s

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlishts

4. lrngation
s20,000.00
ss,o00.oo
9r"250.00
s2,600.o0
Servlce Cois
5, Electdcal s2,000.00
slO 5OO.O0
Current Year lmrrovem€nt Prolects

7. No Plann€d Projects So.oo
subtotol of tEm 7 so@
subtotal s41,3gO.OO
lncld€ntal6sts

8. Professlonal Serulces (Engineer's Report and lPl

9. Cont€ctSeruices (all othercontE.ts and seruices)

10. Publlcadons/Maillngs/Communlcatlons

11. Shtf
12- ovefread

13. CountyAuditor Fee
s7so.0o
$o.oo
So.oo
59,1s1.O0
s1,948.O0
5229.5r
St2,w
lotal lhprovement &*s 353,42a.51
\ssessmcnt io Prolenv {Curent)
Sinsle Family Equlvalent Beneflt Unib
s113.14
349
s{,o11.45
Shot Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (prevlously colle.ted)
Shon'Tem lnstallmdnt Plan (collected this year)
tong-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnitallment &ds
s43,8s6.00
ss4ooo.oo
So.oo
So.oo
S9Z8s5.oo
Dl$rlat Balance
Toblfusessrent
Total lmprovem€nt CosE
subtotal
Total Avallable Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
Contributions from other sources
Net Balance
sM,OLr,46
(Ss3,428.s1)
{s9.417.Os}
(s322s8.s4)
(s46,57s.s9)
(9eZ8s6.ool
S5,ooo.oo
(s139,531.59)
Olstrict Balancc (surplus is +j deflclt is 0l (s139,531.59) Net Asse$ment Glculation
Surplus or Deflcit (surplus is subt€cted; deflclt is added) Net tusessment
S4,ou.46
Sr39,s31.s9
9183,543,O5
S183,s4:'.05
389
s471.83
Allocat€d Net Asssmeht to Propenv
Net Assessment
SinSle Family €quivalent Benefit UniB
Allocated Net&sessment to Propeny
bmparlson of Nd Aise$ment and Ass€sment
Allocated Net A$essment to propeny
Per Par.el Surplus (+) or Deliclt (-)
($4r1.83)
-€4!3-
(s3s8.69)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Disfficts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGoncultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page77
Cobble Hills Ridge - Installment Summary
District: Cobble Hills lllReflections ll
Flscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) (S1s.807)
Iree & landscape imorovements (or replacement) ss.000 S38-855 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s50.000 l\rini Park & Path to Lembi Turf and Shrub Repair/Replacement s10.000 ss.000 s0 So So s0 So s40.000 fotals: s1s,000 s43.8s6 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s90.000
Lonp Term lnstallment Summarv
Fence Reoair/Reolacment [225 ft) s1.000 s6,s00 So So So So So s10,000 Wall Reoairs and Paintins (628 ft) S1,ooo S3s,soo So 5o So So So s40.000 Shrub Reolacement-Glenn/oxburoush Ss,ooo s7.soo so s0 so s0 s0 s55.000 5hrub Reolacement-Siblev and corner s1.000 s0 s0 s0 s0 So So Sls.ooo Sisnage Repair/Replacement s1.000 s1.500 s0 s0 s0 So So S8.ooo free & landscaoe imorovements (or reolacement) s2.000 S3.ooo So So So So So Ss3.Goo fotals: s11,000 ss4,000 9o 3o $o $o $o s19r,600
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
t,*
9ClGonrultlng0noup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page73
startlns Fund Bolonce (as ofApril 2022)
Eilmated Reseve tofinonce opptox, fi6t 5 months ol 22-23 s104313.62
(s6,111.26)
lmprovement Co$s
Geneaal MEintenance @$s

1. scheduled
2, Unscheduled
3, Streetllghts

4. lrdgatlon
s2,s00.00
s3,O00.00
s7s0.00
5400.00
Serulce 6*s

5. Electrical 55oo.oo
$r"250.00
&rrent Year lmorovement Prolects

7. Fence r€palr/Plant & bark stsoo.oo
Subtotul of lEm 6 S5,[email protected]
Subtotal $13,9O.OO
h€idental6*s

8. Professional Services (Englneer's Repo^ and lP)

9. Contract Seruices (all other contccB and seruices)

10. Publicatlons/Malllngs/Communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. County Auditor Fee
57so.oo
so.0o
So.oo
s1,O30.00
s422.0O
557.a2
32,259.a2
Total lmprov€ment Cods 91q1s9.82
Assment lo Propenv (Currentl
tusessment per SinSle Famlly Equivalent
Slngle Famlly Equlvalent Beneflt Units
s139.64
9a
s13,684.72
lnnatrment @is lsee lnstallment Plan and summaru nen oa{el shon-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
sho^-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (coll€cted this year)
531,518.O0
529,000.o0
sL000.o0
51,O00.00
s52,5la.OO
Tobl lmprovement Cosb
Subtotal
Total Avallabl€ Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contilbutlons from other sources
5t3,6a4.72
{s16,1ss.82)
152,475.to)
s9A,2O2.36
s95,727.26
(s62,sX8.00)
So.oo
5E3,2O9.26
Dl*rlct Ealance (surplus ls +; deficlt is {}} s33,209.26 {etf$e$ment &lculation
Surplus or Defrclt (surplus is subtracted; deficlt is added) Net Assessment
s13,84.72
(s33,209.261
(S1e,5u.s4)
(s19,s24.s4)
9a
(S199.231
Clty of Folsoh
Cobble Ridge Landsaplng and tlghtlng Oistrid
Fund 234
2022-23
Allocated Net Asssment to Prooenv
Net Assessment
Single Family Equlvalent Benefit UniE
Allocated Nettusessment to Property
GmEarlsh of Nd Asse$ment and Asse$ment
Allo.ated Net As*ssment to Property
Allocated Assessnent to Propedy
Per Parcel su.plus (+) or Deficlt Gl
9199.23
s139.e
s338.8t
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page74
Cobble Ridge - Installment Summary
District: cobble Ridse
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Balance suT,sss
Short Term lnstallment Summary
S3,ooo vear 2 oruning
s3,ooo vear 3 pruning
s3.000
vear 4 pruning
s3,ooo vear 5 orunins
ss,ooo Fence repair and painting
so So So s17.000 Totals: $o So So $o
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
Sz,ooo S14.750 s2s0 S2so S2so s2s0 s2s0 s20,000 Fence Repair/Replacement (340 ft) s2s0 S2so S2so s2so s2s0 s20.000 Shrub ReDlacement s2.000 S4,7so S40o s3.000 S2so s250 s250 s250 s250 s4.000 lar Fence
Ssoo S2,soo s2s0 S2so S2so s2s0 S2so S3.ooo Tree & landscaoe improvements (or replacements) S2s.ooo s1.000 s1.000 S1,ooo s1.000 s1.000 S47,ooo Totals! 54,9oo City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClConsulttngGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stortlng Fund Bolance (ds olApill 2022)
Estlmated ReseNe blinance dpptox. fl6t 6 months of 22-E S2s,o81.07
(S9,749.20)
lmorovemenl 6$3
ceneral Malntenance co*s

1. Scheduled'*

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights

4. trdgatlon
So.oo
So.oo
s2,OoO.oO
52,7s0.0o
Serulco 6ss

5. Electdcal s3,6s0.0o
s5,750.0O
current Year lmprovement Prole€ts

7. Open space/free work/Ladderfuel remval Sz8,ooo.oo
Subtotul of ltem 7 s28,@.m _
942,1so.oo
lncldental6ds

8. Prcf€sslonal servi.es (EnSineer's Repod and lPl

9. contEct Services (all other cont€cB and seMces)

10. Publlcatlons/Mallings/communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Ov€rhead

13. County Auditor Fee
s75O.OO
So.oo
so.oo
s0.0o
s823.00
s181.72
Subtotal sa,w
Total hprovement 6ns 54!AU.r2
assssment to Proo6nv (current)
Assessm€nt per Slngle Famlly Equlvalent
Slnale Famlly Equlvalent Benefit Unlts
S7o.88
304
521831.@
lnstallment @*s {see lndallment Plan and Summafl nen pa{€l Shon-Term lnsEllment Plan (prevlously collected)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Shoft-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
LonS-Term lnstallment PIan (collected this year)
Total lnstallment 6$3
So.oo
$s6,ooo.oo
So.oo
So.oo
ssoo@,o0
Dlnrlct Balance
TotalAsessrent
Total lmprovement Cosb
subtotal
Total Availabl€ Funds
Tdal Funds
Tobl lnstallment cost
cohtrlbutions from other sources
N€t Balance
s21,831.O4
(s43,904.72)
(s22,073.68)
s15,331.87
(s6,741.81)
(5s6,ooo.oo)
$o.oo
(s62,7 4a.A1]-
Di$rict Balan.e (su.plus ls +j deflcit is 0) lS62,74t,at, Net A$e$ment elculatlon
surplus or Deflclt (surplus is subtGcted; deflclt ls added) Nei Ass€ssment
92!a31.04
s62,741,AL
sa4,s72.a5
se,s72.8s
J
5274,59
Cfly of Folsom
Folsom Heithts bndscaplng end LlShtlnS Dlstrld
Fund zoa
2022-2?
Allocat€d N€t Asssment to Prooedv
Net Ssessment
SinEle Family Equivalent Benefit Unlts
Allocated Net tusessment to Prcperty
6mpeilsn of N€t Assessftent ahd Asse$ment
(S274.s9)
-$4!L
{S2o3.71}
allocated asse$ment to Propeny
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or Deflclt (-l
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page76
Folsom Heights - lnstallment Summary
District: Folsom Heights
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) S31.405
Short Term lnstallment Summarv
Ladder fuel work s2s,000
Totals: So So s0 s0 s0 $o So s2s,000
Lons Term lnstallment Summarv
Totals: $o $o So SO So s0 s0 s0
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonrultlngOrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page77
storting Fund Bolance (ds ol April 2022)
BtimoEd ReseNe to flnonce spptox. li6t 6 monfrs of 22-23 9265,432.27
(s22850.4s)
CltY of Folsom
Folsom Heights No, 2 landsepin8 and tightlnS Dlstrid
Fund 281
2022-23
General Malntenance &*s
sL6,275.OO
s1O,OOO.O0

50.00 1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlights
Servlce Cosls
So.oo
So.oo
curent Year lmprov€ment Prole.ts

6. Tree pruninS/L?dder fuel removal S3ZOOO.OO
937,@.m _
s63,275.00

7. Professiohal Services (Englneer's Report and lP)
a. cont6ctservices {all other contEcB and seruices)

9. Publlcations/Mallings/communlcations

10. Staff

11. overhead

12. County Auditor Fee
$7so.o0
9o.oo
$o.oo
s5,1O0.OO
51,102.00
So.oo
subtotal - S6'm
Totel lmprovPment co$s 57o,227-oo
Assessment per Single Famlly Equlvalent
5inale Family €qulvalent Benefit UnlB
Total A$essment
s2O8.38
299.39
S62ia6.a9
Shofr-Term hstallment Plan (previouslv collected)
Lohg-Term lnslallment Plan (previously collected)
Short-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this vear)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this vear)
Total ln$allnent 6is
So.oo

90.o0
So.oo
So-oo
So.m
Total lmprov€ment cosG
subtotal
552,386.a9
li7o,227.ool
(57,84o.11)
s237,57!.A2
5229,73L.71
so.0o

90.00 s229,731.7L
Tobl lnstallment cost
contdbutions from other sourc€s
Net Balance
ol*rlct Balance (surplus ls+i deflclt i3 (l) 5229,731,7L S62,386.89
surylus or Deflcit (surplus is subtracted; deflclt is added) li229,t3t,7Ll lst67,34,A2l
Allocated N€t As*ssment to Propeftv
l't67,?4.a21
single Family Equivalent Eeneflt UnjB
Al!ocated N€t tusessment to Prop€rty
299
(Ss58.9s)
6mpailson of Net Asse$ment and Assessment
sss8.9s
Allocated Assesment to PropenY
Per Parcel Surplus {+} or Dellclt {-}
S2o8.38
s757.3t
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGrouP

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page78
Folsom Heights No. 2 - Installment Summary
District: Folsom Helshts No.2
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s290.736
Short Term Installment Summarv
vear 3 pruning S8,ooo
vear 4 oruning s8.000
vear 5 orunins s8,000
fence work S2.ooo
Tree care in open space s3,000
Totals: So So So So s0 s0 s0 s29.000
Lons Term lnstallment Summarv
Glenn wall repair So So s0 So So
Tree and landscaoe imprv (Vierra Cirl 5o So So So So
New landscape (Glenn) So So So So So
Totals: So So So So So So So So
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SCtGonrulttngOruup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Stortlng Fund Bolonce (ds ofApill 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to flhance opprcx. fl6t6 monfrs of22-23 s18,375.10
(s9,00s.34)
lmorovement 6$s
Geneaal Malntenance &is

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streedighb

4. kdgatlon
s11,5OO.OO
S2,5oo.oo
s1,250.00
s55O,OO
Serylce 6sts

5. Electdcal s2,soo.oo
s2,soo.oo
current Y€ar lmorovem€nt Prolects

7. No Plann€d Projects $o.oo
so.@ _
s2o,9m.o0
lncldental @ds

8. Prcfessional Seruices (Englneer's Repod and lP)
L convactseruices (all other cont€cB and sedices)

10. Publications/Mallinss/communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Ovetread

13. County Auditor Fee
STso.oo
so.oo
$o.oo
53,776.OO
s743.00
s6O.77
subtotal ss,325,77
Total lmprovement &$s s26,229,r7
qs*ssment to Propedv (Curr€ntl
Asessment per slngle Family Equlvalent
Single Famlly Equlvalent Ben€fit Unlts
s195.78
S20,16s.34
n$allmenl &sts {r€e ln$ellment Plan and Suhmaru nen Earel Shon-Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected)
Lohg-Tem lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected)
Short-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this y€ar)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this yearl
Total lnstallment 6ss
s7,soo.oo
s28,4O.OO
so.0o
ss4.0o
$6,4e.O0
Di$rlct Aalanc€
TotalAsessrent
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnsbllment cost
contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s20,155.34
(s26,229.771
(s6,064.43)
S11,s30.76
ss,466.33
(S36,484.00)
So.oo
(s31.017.67)
Dl$rlct Balance (surplus is +; dellclt is 0) ($31,01?.67) Net Asessment qlculation
920,16s.34
Surplus or Deficit (surpl!s ls subtmcted, deficit Is added) stL,ot7,67 s51,1a3.01
Allocat€d N€t Assssment to Propedv
Ctty of Folsom
Hannaford cross knds@pinSand LlghtlnsOlstrld
Fund 212
2022-23
S51,1a3.01
-J
5496.92
Single Fam!ly Equivalent Benefit Uni$
Allocated Net ksessment to Property
comparlson of Net Assesment and A$essment
allocated Net As*ssment to Property
Allocated Assessment to Property
Per Parcel surplus (+l or Def,clt (-)
(s495.92)
-lgzg-
(s301.14)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngQroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Hannaford Cross - lnstallment Summary
District: Hannaford Cross
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) (Ss,s71)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Lakeside fense repair s25,000
vear 2 pruning ss,ooo
vear 3 pruning ss.000
vear 4 prunine Sso.ooo
vear 5 pruning ss.000
Reoairs at euardshack S3,soo
Totals: $o s0 s0 So So SO $o S93,soo
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: s0 So So So SO $o so s0
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SCtOone ultlngQroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Sturtinq Fund Bdlonce (ds oJ Aptil 2022)
Esilmo@d Reseve to flnonce opprcx. fiEt6 monhs of 22-23 s97,213.26
(Sg264.oo)
lmprovement Coss
General Malntenance &is
X, Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetllghts

4. ldgatlon
S7,ooo.oo
ss,o00.00
57so.oo
s1,OOO.OO
Sgryilclg!!! 5. Electdcal SToo.oo
s3,000.00
Qrrent Year lhorovement Prolecls

7. LED conve6ion/Tre€ work s8,0oo.oo
Subtotol of ltem 7 s8,m.m _
S2t4so.@
ln.idental 6ds

8. Professional serylces (Engineer's Repod and lP)

9. Conthct Services (all othercontEcts and services)

10. Publlcatlons/Mailings/communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. CountyAuditorFee
s7so.o0
so.oo
so.oo
s2,860.0O
s943.00
566.57
- S4,fffi
Total lmprov€ment 6$s s30,069.67
Assslment to Prcpenv lfrrrent)
ksessm€nt per Single Family Equlvalent
Slngle Famlly Equivalent Beneflt Unlts
s183.S8
113
52O,7Ms4
lnnallhent Costs (see indallment Plan and Sumfrary nes oarel Short-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallment PIan (previously collected)
short-Tem tBtallment Plan (collect€d thls year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
$o.m
$26,8s7.o0
So.oo
S1,zso.oo
92&1O7.m
Dldrlct Balance
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement Cosb
subtotal
s2O,14,54
{s30069.67)
(S9,32s.13)
sa7,949.26
57a,624.13
ToEl lnstallment cost (s28,107.00)
Contdbutions from other sources 9o.oo
sso,s17.13
Dldrict Balance (s!rplus is +; deficit is (l) $so,s17.13 surplus or Deficit (sunlus ls subtGcted; deflclt is added) s2O,74,54
(ss0,s17.13)
ls29,7r2,s9l
192s,772,591
113
1926t.471
Clty of Folsom
bke Natoma shores Lands€ping and tightlng Dlslrld
Fund 213
2022-23
Allo.ated Net A$essment lo ProEonv
Net fusessment
Slnale Family Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net Assessmeht to Property
bmbarison of Nct asssment and ase$m€nt
s26t.47
$ra3.sa
94t.os
Alloaated a$essment to Prop€ny
Per Parcel surplus (+) or Deflclt (-)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SQlGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Lake Natoma Shores - lnstallment Summary
District: Lake Natoma Shores
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Balance S101,218
short Term lnstallment summary
ss.000 LED landscape lishts
5000 vear 3 orunins
5000 vear 4 orunins
5000 vear 5 oruning
s0 s0 So So $o s0 s20.000 Totalsr So
Lons T€rm lnstallment Summary
ss00 ss00 Ssoo ss00 Ssoo s1s.000 Sipnaee Reoair/Replacement s1,000 sr4,607 S1.ooo S2so S2so s2s0 S2so S2so s22.000 Turf reoair/irrisation uogrades 52,750 s1.000 S4,soo Ssoo ss00 ss00 ss00 Ssoo S16,ooo rr€e & landscaoe improvements (or replacements) s3.000 s2L.8s7 s1,2s0 s1,2s0 s1.2s0 s1.2s0 s1,2s0 ss3,000 fotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlGonrultlng0roup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Storting Fund Bolonce (os ofApil 2022)
Estimated ReseNe b linonce opprcx.ftst 6 months of 22-23 5152,489.98
(s18,237.09)
lmrrovement 6sts
General Malntenance Cons

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlighb
s12,s00.00
S1o,o@,0o
s3,000.oo
!sY!eelg$! 4. Electrical s7,15O.O0
S4,7so.o0
&rrent Year lmorovement Proiects

6. Paint lieht polesfree pruning s4s,000.00
subtotol ol ltem 5 s45,0O0.00 _
subtotal S82y'm'm
lncldental bsts

7. Professional Seruic€s (Enginee/s R€pofr and lP)

8. Contract Seruices (all othercontracts and seruices)

9. Publicatlons/Maillngs/Communlcatlons
Xo. Staff

11. Overhead

12. CountyAuditor Fee
s75O.0O
So.oo
So.oo
s4690.00
s1,305.O0
S1e8.e3
subtotal
Total Improvem€nt &is
S69€.83
589,343.83
Assessment to Propedv (Cu.rehtl
Asessment per 5ingle Family Equivalent
Slngle Famlly Equlvalent Beneflt unlts
Total Assessment
St21.t8
337
s4O,837.65
Insallment 6sts lsee lnsallmont Plan and Summaru nen oarcl Shofr'Tem lnstallment Plan (prevlously cotlected)
Long-Term lnltallment Plan (prcvlously coll€cted)
shod-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnsallment &*s
S3,mo.oo
S12s,4oo,oo
so.oo
52,4oo.oo
S130,8m.@
Ol*rlct Aalahce
s40,a37.66
Total lmprcvement costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Iohl Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contdbutlons from other sources
(S89,343.83)
($48,so6.u)
s134,252.89
sas,746.72
(5x30,8oo.oo)
So.oo
(54s,0s3,28)
Dl*rlct galan.e {surplus ls +; dellclt ls (}} ($as,os3,28) Nd assesrmehl qlculataon
$4,S37.66
Surylus or Deficit (surylus ls subt€ctedj d€flclt ls added) s45.O53.2a s8s,890.94
Allocated Net Assessment to Propeny
s8s,a9o.94
tt7
Szs4.a7
Clty of Folsom
Los C€rros Landscaping and Lighting Dlstrid
F!nd 2O4
2022-23
Allocated ilet assessment to Probertv
NetAssessment
Comparlson of Net Assessment and Asressment
(S2s.87)
-c419-
(S133.691
Allo.ated A$essment to Property
Per Parcel Surplus (+) or Detlch Gl
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Los Cerros - Installment Summary
Dlstrlct: Los Cerros
Flscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance s101.218
Slo,ooo Ladder fuel work
s10.000 free reDlacement
s10,000 vear 3 pruninq
Slo.ooo year 4 pruning
s10.000 vear 5 Drunine
s27,3oo Paint street lisht poles
So So so s0 So S77,30o fotals: So $o
LonE Telm lnstallment Summary
s30.000 lnstall master valve
s3s,000 Uosrade irrisation controllers
So $o s0 So $o s65,000 Iotals: $o so
'1",r'.'1. ']:.:'
,I .i
. r.r rL ":.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClConsultlngGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

sturtlng Fund Bolance (os ofapil 2022)
Estimated ReseNe to finonce opprcx. fl6t6 monhs of 22-23 (92s1,590.48)
(S72693.ss)
lmDrovement Ois
GenerEl Malntenance 6$s

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlishts

4. lrdryatlon
s9s,oo0.o0
s1Zs00.oo
s12,000.00
s17,sO0.00
Serulce Co*s
s. Electrical s18,s00.00
s45,O0O.00
Current Year lm.rovemeht Prolects

7. No planned prcjects So.oo
subtotol ol ltem 7 so.@
Subtotal s2m,500.0o
tncldental&*s

8. Professional Seruices (Englneer's Report and lP)

9. Contract Sedices (all other contccb and seruices)

10. Publlcations/Mallings/communlcations

11. Staff

12. Ovefread

13. County Auditor Fee
575o.oo
$o.oo
So.oo
s32,602.OO
55,90O.O0
51,119.37
Total lmprovement @*s
s4o3M
sao,a7r37
tusessment per Single Famlly Equivalent
Slngle Famlly Equivalent Benefit Unlts
S91.70
7,497.23
s1t3,975.36
Shofr-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (pr€vlously collected)
shon-Tem Installment Plan (collected this yead
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Toral lnstallment 6ns
s3O 00o.o0
s98,O20.O0
So oo
Ssoo.oo
sua,a20.0o
Total lmprovement Costs
subtohl
Total Available Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contdbutions from other sources
Net Ealance
s173,976.36
1s240,a7r37)
(S6689s o1)
$247,754.O31
(s314es.o4)
{s128,820.O0)
so.oo
1s443,45s.o41
Disrlct Balance (surplus ls +; deficlt ls 0) {s43,469.04} s773,976,36
Surplus or Detlclt (surptus is subtncted; d€ficlt Is added) 3s3,469.o4 36a7,45.4O
56t7,4s.&
aa9,
932s.4s
Clty ofFolsom
Natoma Station bndsaping and lithtlng District
Fund Zo7
2022-23
Allocated Nel Assssment to Prooeiv
Net Assessment
Sinale Famlly Equivalent Benefit Unlb
Allocated Net tusessment to Propeny
Gmparlson of Net As€sment and A$e$ment
Allocated Nd A$essment to ProPertY
allocated Asessment to Propeny
Per Parcel sutplus (+) or D€fi€it G)
(S325.4s)
991.7o
(S233.7s)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SclConrultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Natoma Station - Installment Summary
District: Natoma Station
Fiscal Year: 2022-2?
Fund Balance (2O22) (s246.8s7)
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Ladder fule work Slo,ooo
Lisht Dole replacement s25-000
Shrub & tree reolacement and concrete work on turnpike S4o.ooo lron Point Rd shrub & tree reolacement s40.000
Bigfood mini park tree reDlacement Slo,ooo
Tree replacement/wall damase on back diamond Slo.ooo
Shrub/Tree replacement on Blue Ravine s40.000
vear 1 tree orunins s2s,000
Totals: So So So So So So $o 3200.o00
LonE Term lnstallment Summarv
Tree & s160.000 landscape improvements (or replacements) Wetland area imorovement s30.000
Wall Reoair/Paintins (7800 feet) t234,OOO
Mini Park-reDlantine/bark'2 oarks at 1/2 acre) s60.000
Road Paver replacement s40.000
Sisnase Repair Replacement s23.O00
Sidewalk repair s80.000
lrrisation uosrades s55.000
Art repair s100,000
fotals: So So So So so so s0 s783.000
:l^t,iri,,.r.:, ii"iirji.,1"r,, ..1; i.
r. ").r r,;
', ' .:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonrultlng6rcuB

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Starting Fund Bolance (os otApil 2022)
Eslmoted ReseNeto linonce opprcx fist6 monthsof22-23
s219,829.55
l93o,2a2.26)
CltYof Folsom
Natomavalley Lands6plna and LiShllng Dlstrid
Fund 232
2022-2C
[email protected]$ll
s32,sOO.OO
s7,5OO.O0
S375.oo
s1,000.00

1. 2.

3. scheduled
Unscheduled
Streetlishc
lrrigation
Servl6 Costs

5. 5.

Electilcal s1,soo.oo
s3,750.O0
Current Yeer lmorovement Proteds

7. No planned prcjects $o.oo
So oo
subtotal s45,625.0O

8. Professional servic€s (Engineer's Reportand lP)

9. conkact services {all other contracb and services}

10. Publlcatlons/Mailings/communlcatlons

11. Sbff

12. Overhead

13. County Audltor Fee
s75O.O0
5o.00
So.oo
97,436.00
S1,687.oo
s46.61
Subtotal SrBlm
Total lmprovement Co*s Ss6,544.61
Nsessment per Slngle Family Equlvalent
slngle Family Equivalent aenefit Unlts
98s6.37
79 567,553.23
short-Term I nstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstall ment Plan (pr€vlously collected)
short-Term lnstallment Plan (collectd this vear)
Long-Term lnstallment PIan (col lected thls year)
so.oo
So.oo
So.oo
so.oo
So.oo
Total fusessment
Total lmprovement CosB
Subtotal
Toral Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallmentcost
Contributions from other sources
Net Balance
s67,6s3.23
(9s6,544.61)
s11,108.52
s189,617.29
52OO,72s.9t
So.oo
So oo
s2OO,72s,97
olilrld Balanc (surplusls +; defidt ls 0) S200t25.91
567,6s3.23
Surplus or Defl.lt (surplus is subtracted; deficlt is added) -{13ll4ltr&
(s133,072.68)
AlesEllfG3ersffiilqP@sly
Net Bsessment
Single Family Equivalent Benetit Units
Allocated Net Asessm€nt to Property
ts133.O72.6a1
79 ls1-684.46)
Comprrlson of NEt Asesmeht and Arsessm.nt
Alloeted NQt Asssshent to ProP€nY
Alloded Assessment to ProPefrY
Per Parel surplus (+l or Deficlt (t
S1,544r5
-t$$11-
$2,540.83
fr6m f0nd brlan.e
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Natoma Valley - lnstallment Summary
District: Natoma Valley
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s238,9s9
Short Term lnstallment Summary
vear 3 pruning ss,s00
vear 4 pruning ss.500
vear 5 oruning Ss,soo
lnterior landscape improvements ss,s00
Totals: So $o $o s0 s0 s0 So s22.000
Lone Term lnstallment Summary
Wall Repair/Replacement Ss.ooo SO So So So So So ss0.000 Totals: Ss,ooo s0 s0 So s0 9o $o ss0,000
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClConsulttngGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
Stdrtinq Fund Bolonce (as of Aptil 2022)
Esdmated ResNe to flnonce apprcx. fhst 6 months oJ 22-23 S14,690.66
(s14,022.80)
Clty ofFolsom
Prosped Ridge tands€plng and Lighting Dlstild
Fund 285
2022-2t
lmprovement Co$5
Geheral Malntenahce &is

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduied
3, streetlighb

4. lrlgation
S7,soo.oo
s8,3oO.Oo
s5OO,OO
SSoo,oo
Serulce &ns

5. Electdcal 537s.oo
s2,s00.oo
Grrent Ycar lmprovement Ptoiects

7. No Planned Prolecb So.oo
Subtota! of ttem 6 S"-
S1977s.oo
lncldental6$s

8. Professional servic€s (Engineer's Report and IP)
9, Contract Seruices (all othercontracts and seryices)

10. Publications/Malllngs/communicatlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. County Auditor Fee
sTso.oo
So,oo
so.oo
ss,219,OO
9219.0O
s20.6s
Subtotal s52ffi
Total Improvement 6*s s2t9E3.65
tusessment per Single Family Equivalent
Single Family Equlvalent Benefit Unlts
st,a73,a6

26.75 531,4m.75
ln*allment 6*s (see in$allmcnt Plan ahd Summary nen laeel Shod-T€rm lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected,
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (pr€viously collected)
Shon-Tem lnsbllment Plan (collected thls year)
Long-Tem lnshllment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnsallment co$s

90.oo
$o.oo
So.@
$0.m
So'oo
DI$rlct Balance
Total Assessment
Total lmp@€ment Cosb
subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment Cost
contdbutlons from other sources
Net Balance
$31,{O.76
{52s,983.6s)
ss,477.7L
9667.86
SG,o8a.96
So oo
So oo
s6,084.96
Dlsrkt aalance (surplus ls +; deflclt ls 0) 96,Os.96
let Asse$m€nt Glculatlon
surylus or Deficit (surplus is subt€ctedi deficit is added) Net &sessment
531"46,76
(s6.09.951
$25,3t5,79
Allocated Net Asle$ment to ProEenv
Net Asessment
Single Family Equivelent senefit units
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
$25,31s.79
27 5946.38
6moarlson of Not A$essment tnd Ase$dent
allocated Net Assessment to Propeny
Allocated Asssfient to Ptop€tty
Per Parcel Surplus (+l or Defitlt (-)
(Ss45.381
$1,173.86
5227.4a
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Prospect Ridge - Installment Summary
District: Prosoect Ridse
Flscal Year: 2022-21
Fund Balance s23,2t3
Short Term lnstallment Summary
year 1 pruning
year 2 pruning
year 3 pruning
year 4 pruning
year 5 pruning
Totals: $o So So 5o so s0 So $o
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: $o So s0 So $o $o $o So
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonrultlng0roup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23

Esilmoted ReseNe toflnonce opprcx. flret6 months of 22-23 Sturting Fund Edldnce '(ds oI Aptit 2022) 154sa,82e.72) (s87,630.83)
la!r9v9rq!!9$!
Genelal Malntenance 6$s

1. scheduled
2, Unscheduled
3, Streetlights
4, fdsation-Pads
so.oo
So.oo
slO,ooo.oo
So.oo
serylce Costs

5. Electical s10,O0O.OO
s60,O00.OO
Curent Year lm!rovement Prolects

7. No planned prcjecB So.oo
Subtotal ol ltem 7 SO.0O
subtotal s8O,[email protected]
lncidental6ns

8. Professlonal Sewices (€nSineer's Report and lP)

9. contEct Serulces (all othercont€cE and seillces)

10. Publicatlons/Mallings/communications
U. Staff

12. Ovefread

13. countyAuditor Fee
s75O.OO
so,oo
so.oo
ss9,484.00
96,818.0O
s541.99
Subtotal s6?59s
Total lmprcvement 6*s s147,s93.99
Assssmont to P?opertv lcurreht)
Assessment per slngle Family €quivalent
Single Family Equivalent Aenefit Unib
s213.61
91a.63
9196,228,55
lnstallment @$s lsee iniallm€nt Plan and summaru nen pa.el shod-Term lnstallm€nt Plan {prevlously collected)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Shod-Tem lnstallment PIan {collect€d this year)
Long-Terf, lnstallment Plan (colle.t€d this year)
Total Installnent 6ns
s117,2O0.0O
997,77L.oo
So.oo
5o.oo
s214911,0O
Dlsriat galanc€
Total lmprovement Costs
Subtotal
Total Available Funds
Total lnstallment cost
Contdbutions frcm other sources
Net Balance
s196228.5s
(s147,s93.99)
s48,634.s5
(9s45,460.ss)
(S497,82s.99)
(s21491X.0O)
So.oo
ls7 L2,736.991
Oisrict gal.nce (surplus is +; deliclt i3 {ll 1s712,736,99' Net A$6$ment glculatlon
su@lus or Deficit (surplus is subtracted; deficit is added) Net Assessment
9196,228.55
s712,736.99
S$8,96s.ss
s908,965.55
919
s989.S
Ctty of Fobom
Pralrle oaks Ranch landscaping and Llthtlng Distrld
Fund 236
2022-2tt
Allocat€d Net A$e$msnt to Prolertv
N€t Assessment
' Slngle Famlly Equivalent Benefit Units
Allocated Net tusessmeht to Property
bmparlson of Net As*$ment and Ass€$ment
Allocated Net Assssment to Propeny
alloaated ase$ment to Propedy
Per Patcel Surplus (+) or Def,clt Gl
{9e8e.48}
-t491-
(577s.a71
$ClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Prairie Oaks Ranch - Installment Summary
District: Prairie Oaks Ranch
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) (s4s1,s381
Short Term Installment Summary
fotals: $o s0 so $o 5o So SO $o
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: s0 $o $o So s0 So $o $o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultlngGnoup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.
cltyofFolsom
Prelrle Oaks nanch No.2 kndscaPiry and tiShtlng Dlnrld
Fund 215
2022-23
Stontns Fund salonce (os of Aptil 2022)
Estimoted R6eNe to flnonce opptox. fitst 6 nonhs ol 22-A $159,&7.18
l.s72a,777 .661
morcvcment Co*s
General Malnt€nanc€ Cons
l. trddd- tu.
unscheduled
'3. Sheetllghb

4. kdsatlon-Pads
s135.000.@
920,000.m

50.@
S2o,ooo.m
Sewic€ 6ns
-.
?. wrt",
So.oo
s0.00
Tree replacment keplace empty ar€ad
IED landscape llrhb
Landscape replacenent
Repaf damage walb Gtucco halfwalls)
Subtotal oJ lten 7-12
Subtotel
s1@,@.@
s275,m.O
lncldenbl Costs ---Ti-il*"ionur s".ices lEnsrn€e/5 Repon rnd lP)

14. contect sewices {all oth€r contracts and seruices}

15. Publications/Mailings/Communication5 tre. st"ff

17. @erhead

18. counwaudltorFee
s7s0.00
s0.@
9o.oo
s0.00
5s,2oo.@
So.oo
sublotal '
rotal lmprovementCo5G
$tru
-3iidgm
ss€ssmeft to Paooenv lcurrend
Assessment per SinBle Family Equivalent
Siqle Famlly Equivalent B€nef it Unlts
s313.91
918.63
t2aa357.L4
shod'Term Installment Plan (prevlously collected)
Long-Term ln*allment Plan (prevlously coll€cted)
shon'Term lnstallment Plan (collected thls year)
Lons-T€rm lnilallment Plan (collected this yead
Totallnstallment co*s
s0.00
So.m

50.@

50.00 so.m
Total lmprov€ment costs
subtotal
Tot6lAvailable Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallm€ntcost
Contributions from other sources
Szaa,a67.14
(s28o,9so.m)
57,4t7.t4 t
s:o,gog.sz --13s2ffi,
s0,00
$38,286.67
Dhtrld Balan.e Gurplusls +;d€flcltls (l) s38,286.57
Nel &Essment Cal€ulallon
s28&367.14
surplusdrDeficit{surplusissubtracted,deficitisadded} tsr&286.57) s250,080.6
s2s0,0E0.4
_________:E
5272.23
Alloeted iletkessment lo P.ooed
N€tAs€ssment
Singl€ Family Equivalent Benefi t Units
Allocated NetAsessment to Property
Conpailron of Net ksessment and &sessment
Allo.ated Net Asessment to P.op€ny
Allocat€d &essm€nt to Paoperty
P€r Parcel suplus (+l oro.tlclt G)
15272'2al
s313.91
141,68
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23

SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2 - lnstallment Summary
District: Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2
Fiscal Year: 2022-2?
Balance s1s9.647
Short Term lnstallment Summary
s2s,000 vear 1 oruning
s25.000 vear 2 Druning
Szs,ooo vear 3 prunins
s2s.000 vear 4 orunins
s25.000 5
em s15,000 a
s25.000 LED landscaoe liehts
s25.000 Landscape replacement
s20,000 Fence replacement
s75.000 Ladder fuel
s8.000 walls half
s0 So So So s0 s210.000 Totals: So $o
Lons Term lnstallment summary
s2s0.000 Landscaoe reolacement on Blue Ravine
S2so,ooo Landscape Replacement on RileY
91so,ooo Landscape Replacement on Prairie City
s100.000 on lron Point
Sloo,ooo Fence
Szs.ooo Post and cable replacement
walls S4o,ooo
s965.000 Totals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SCl9onrultlng0rcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.
s@rting Fund Balance (os of Apdt 2022)
Estlmoaed Re*Ne to flnonce opptoL flrst 6 months of 22-2i s6404.30
(s4074.28)
Clty ofFolsom
fre Resldences ATARC (oakAvel bndscaplna ahd tlghtln8 Dlstrld Fwd27l
2022-23
mrrov€m€nt &*s
G€neral Malnt€nance @$s

3. Streetllghts

4. kdsation Pac
s12,OOO.oO
93,000.00
s7so.o0
s1,2OO.O0
5crulce 6ss

5. Electrlcal SToo.oo
s3,30O.OO
Current Year lmorovement Proleds

7. Landscapereplacement S4,[email protected]
stbtotol oJ lem a 54,m.@
324.950.00
lncldental 6*s
a. Prcfessional Seruices (Enginee/s Repo^ and lP)

9. Cont€ctSeruices (all oth€rcontracts and seruic€s)

10. Publications/Malllngs/communl.atlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. counv Audltor Fee
s37s.00
9o.oo

90.@
s4,o\2.OO
S915.oo
s1O.O3
st312.03
Total lmprov€nent 6ds s30,262.0t
Ase$ment to Probertv (@rrent)
Assessm€nt per Singl€ Family Equlval€nt
sinSl€ Family Equivalent B€nefit UniB
5536.57
17 s9,123.39
s'123.39
shod-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
tona-Tem lnstallrent Plan (prevlously collected)
shot-Tem lnstallment Plan {collected this year)
tong-Tem lnstallreht Plan {collected this y€ar)
Totalln*allm€nt 6nr
S4,ooo.oo
514.000.00
Sz,om.oo
S1,ooo.oo
S65,mo.oo
)lndd 6alahcc
Total Assessment
Total lmprovement cost
subtotal
s9,a23.39
(s30.262.03)
(s2L138.64)
ss9,970.02
s38,831.38
(s6too0.oo)

90.00 (926,168.621
Total lnstallment CGt
contdbutions f rcm other sources
Dln.lct salance {surplusl! +, den.ft ls 0} (s26168.52)
Net As$ment elculatlon
surplus or Deflct (suplu! ls subkactedj deflctr ls added) Net Asessment
$9,123.39
s26,168,62
335.292.01
Allocated Net AsE$mcnt to Proledv
935,292.01
-
s2,076.@
Th€ R€tid€nc€s 6t ARCI
N€tBsessment
5ingle Family Equivalent Benefit UnlB
Allocated NetAsessmnt to Prop€rty
amEarlsn ot Net assm€nt and aseshEtrt
Thc R€sldenc€s at ARCI
($2,076.00)
3s36.67
(s1,s39.33)
Allo.ated As*ssm€nt to Prope^y
Per Parcel surplus [+) o] Deflch (-)

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The Residences at ARC - lnstallment Summary
District: The Residences at ARC
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s67,680
Short Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARC
s4,s00 Landscape replacement
Totals: $o So $o $o so so SO S4,soo
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARC
$o So So s0 $o $o So So Totals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonrultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

stodns Fund Boton.e (as oIApdl 2022)
Esilmoted Reseile toflnonce apqoL JiRt 6 monhs of 22-23 s64,04.3O
155,224.AOt
City of Folsom
fre Resld€nces At ARc ll (Folsom-Auburn Blvd) tands€aplng and Ughtlng Dlstrld Fund 271
2022-23
mErov€m€nt Cois
G€neral Malnr€nance&*s

3. sv€etliahG

4. lnlSatlon Pafrs
s12,OOO.@
S3,OOO.OO
s7so.o0
s1,2OO.OO
SeNlc€ @$s

5. Electdcal SToo.oo
s3,3OO.OO
Current Vear horov€ment Proleds

7. Landscapereplacement s4,00o.oo
9,@.@
subtotal 524,950.O
lncldental 6ds

8. Prcfessional s€ryices (Eneln€e1s Repod and lP)

9. contEdserulces {all othercontmcts and serulces}

10. Publlcatlons/Mallings/Communlcatlons

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. counwAuditorFee
s37s.0o
s0.oo
so.oo
s4,012.00
5915.oo

55.90 subtotal
Total lmprovem€nt 6is
s5,307.S
s3O,257.S
A$€$ment to Pro.e.tv l&ttentl
tusessment perSlngle Family Equlvalent
Sinsle Famlly Equlvalent Beneft unlts
91,169.97
10 s11,699.70
s11,699.70
short-Tem lnstallment Plan (prevlously couectedl
Lons-Tem lnstallment Plan (prevlously collected)
short-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this y€ar)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collect€d this year)
Total lnnallfient 6ds
s37,0@,OO
s14O0O.OO
92,O0O.OO
s1,O00.oo
$54,000.m
Jdrlc8d!4
Total bs€ssment
Total lmprovem€nt Costs
subtotal
s11,699.70
(s3o,2s7.9Ol
(s18,5s8.20)
Total lnshllment Cost
contdbutions from dher sources
s58,819.50
s4o,261.30
(s54,OO0.OO)
so.oo
(s13,738.70)
Dl*rict Balanc€ (surplusls +; deflcit is ()) (s13,738,70) {et A$e!sment 6l.ulation
Surolus or Deficlt (surplus is subkacted; deficlt ls added) Net Assessment
s1r"699.70
s13,73A.70
s25tr38.40
Allocared Net As€$ment lo Propedv
The Resldences at ARc ll
Net &sessment
Slngle Family Equivalent Ben€flt Unlb
Allocated Net Asessment to Property
325,4S.40
10 52"s43.u
&moailron ol N€t Assessment and A$essh€nt
The R€sldences.t ARc il
Allo.ai€d Net Assrm.ht to ProP€dY
allocat€d asse$ment to Prop€dy
P€r Parcel surFlui (+) or Def,.lt C)
(sa543.s)
s1.169.97
lsai73.e7l
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SQlGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

The Residences at ARC ll ' lnstallment Summary
District: The Residences at ARc ll
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s67.680
Short Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARCII
S4,soo Landscape replacement
s0 so So s4.500 Totals: $o s0 $o So
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
The Residences at ARC ll
SO $o $o So So $o SO Totals: so
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, tY 2022'23
SClConrultlngGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

storting Fund Balance (osofApill 2022)
Estimoted Resetue to finance opprox lirct 6 months of 22'23 saoz,4793a
9o.oo
Clty of Folsom
sllverbrook bndscaplng and LiShting Dlstrld
Fund 2t7
2022-2t
G€neral Malntonance Co5t5
s3,1S5.00
sl,soo.oo
s1,2OO.OO
slso.oo

1. Scheduled

2. Unscheduled*

3. str€etllShB*

4. ldgation Parts
servl.€ 6is

5. Electdcal' 55O0.00
ssoo.oo
furrent Year lmtrovement Proiecis

6. No planned prcjecb so.oo
s0.@
Subtotal 37,OOs.@

7. a.

9. 10.

11. !2.

Professional servic€s (Engln€er's Repod and lP)
Contract seruices (all othercontracts and seruices)'
Publications/Mailings/Communications
staff
CountyAuditor Fee
sTso.oo

90.00 slOO.OO
3r,L4.oo
S47.oo
567.r7
Subtotal - s'?'w;;
Total lmprov€ment cods s9,58.17
A$esment to Propertv (Currentl
Assessm€nt per slngl€ Family Equlvalent
Sinale Famlly Equivalent Benefrt Unib
so.oo
113.84
So'm
shod-Tem lnstallment Plan {previolsly collected)
LonC-Tem installment Plan (prevlously collected)
Shofr-Term lhstallment Plan (collected this Year)
LonS-Term lnsbllment Plan (collected this vear)
So.oo
ss7,oo0.oo
so.00
so.oo
ss7,m.m
Total Assessment to propedy
Total lfiprcvement cosb
subtotal
so,oo
1s9,s13.17)
(s9,s13.17)
5102,479.3r
s92,966.\4
($57,00O.00)
5o.oo
s3s,956.14
Total lnstallment corb
Contributiohs f rcm other sources
Dl*rict Balance (su.plus ls +, deflcit ls 0) $3s,966,14

90.@
suetus or Deflclt {surylus is subtracted; deflcit is added) {s35,gtr.14} ts35,966.14)
Allocrted N€t A$essment to Prooertv
(93tes.141
slngle Family Equivalent Benefn Unlts
Allocated Net &sessment to Property
114
(s31s.e4)
@mrarlsn of Net A$essment and Asse$m€nt
Allocat€d Net Assessment ro Property
Allocat€d Assersment to ProPenY
Per Parcel surplus (+) or Deficlr G)
s31s.q
so.@
93ls.$
Assessments will not be levied for 2022-23.

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Silverbrook - lnstallment Summary
District: Silverbrook
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s702,449
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Tree replacement s7,s00
Totals: $o SO So $o so SO So $7,500
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Median Relandscaping $s,ooo ss7,000 5o $o So SO So sr.50,000 Totalsl ss,000 ss7,000 $o So So So SO s150,000
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2O22'23
$ClConcultingGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Storttng Fund Bdlonce (as of Apdl 2022)
Esttmoted qesetue to flnonce opptox' fl6t 6 months of 22-23 sa7,5OA.24
{$10,84.06)
CltV of Folsom
steeplechase bnds.apiha and Llahtina Distrid
Fund 2S1
2022-23
General Malntenance ft$s

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetllghts

4. lrdgatlon Pads
s11,000.00
s7,soo.00
s1,250.O0
S6ob.oo
serui€e Costs

5. Electdcal s2,100.oo
s3,75O.OO
Current Year lmprovement Prolects

7. Fence replacemenyfree work s13,000.O0
s13,@.@ _
subtotal s39,[email protected]
a.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. Professlonal seruices (€ngineels Repofr and lP)
contFct seruices (all othercontracb and seruices)
Publicatlons/Mailings/Communications
shff
STso.oo
So.oo
So.oo
s4O19.O0
s841.OO
countyAuditor Fee $883.oO
subtotal
Total lmprovement @$s
s5,493.0O
S4s.693.00
\ssessmenl lo Prooenv (Currentl
Assessment p€r Single Family Equlvalent
Single Family Equiwlent Benefit Unlb
s1s7.68
154
s24,2A2.r2
nstallment 6$r {see insallment plan and Summary nen Datel shon-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term Installment Plan (previously collecred)
short-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnnallment @rtt
S73,376.0o
$8s,s00.0o
ss,000.00

56.5OO.OO
$1t0,376.0O
Tobl lmprovement Cosb
subtotal
Total available Funds
Total lnsbllment cost
contributions from other sources
N€t Balance
s24,2A2.72
(S4s,693.0o)
{s21,410.28)
s75,664.1a
S55,2s3.90
(517O,376.O0)
so.oo
(S11s,122.10)
Dlsrlct Balance (surplus is +; dell.lt is {)} (3u5,122,101 s24,2a2.72
Surplus or Deflclt (surplus is subtracted; deflclt ls added) Su5,122.ro s139,404.82
Allocated Net Asssment to Propedv
Net Assessment
Slnale Family Equlvalent aeneflt Unls
Allocat€d Net Asessment to Property
s139,@.82
154
S905.23
@moarlsn of Net As*sment and A$esment
Allocated Net As*ssment to Propeny
P€r Parcel Surplus {+) or Deflclt (-}
(S90s,23l
-tggl
(s74t.5s)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClConsultingGrouP

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Steeplechase - lnstallment Summary
District: Steeplechase
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) s83,778
Short Term lnstallment Summary
s8.000 fence replacments near park
vear 2 tree pruning Ss,ooo
ss.000 vear 3 tree pruning
vear 4 tree oruninq ss,000
ss.000 vear 5 ffee pruning
Totals: $o So So So s0 $o SO s28,000
Lons Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: $o SO So $o $o 3o SO 5o
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClCon*ultlngGrcup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Page L03
Stortlng Fund Bolonce (as ofApill 2022)
Estimoted ReseNe to finonce apprcx. fiEt 6 months oJ 22-23 s22,2a9.aO
(S4050.25)
General Malnt€nance 6ss

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetllghts

4. hdgatlon Pafrs
s3,O00.00
sx,soo.00
s2s0.00
53s0.00
Servlce 6*s

5. Electncal s325.OO
58s0.00
Current Year lmprov€ment Prolects

7. Tree replacement s7,s00.00
Subtotol of ltem 7 57,5@.@
s13,775.O0

8. Professional Services (Englneer's Repot and lP)

9. Cont€ct Servlces (all othercont€cts and seruices)

10. Publlcatlons/Mallings/communicatlons

11. Sbff

12. Ovetread

13. County Auditor Fee
STso.oo
so.00
9o.oo
s1,14.00
s219.00
sL4_75
s4ffi
Total lmprovement 6*s sts,9o2.75
Assmnt to Prop€nv (Currentl
Assessm€nt per Single Famlly Equlval€nt
slngle Family €qulvalent aenefit Units
s363.68
25 59,o92.@
shofr-Term Installment Plan {previously collected}
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
shoft-T€m lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
So.oo
$98s8.0o
So.oo
s1,1O0.0O
s9,958,00
Dlnrid Balance
TotalAsEessrent
Tobl hprovem€nt Costs
s0btotal
99,o92.0o
{915,9O2.7s}
(S5,810.7s)
Total lnstalim€nt cost
contrlbutlons from other sources
S!a,229.s4
s11,418.79
(99,9s8.OO)
5o.oo
st,46o.79
Dl*rlct Balanco (surplus ls+; deffclt ir 0l s1,4ff.79
N€t Asae$ment glculation
Surplus or Deflclt (surplus is subtEded; defr.lt is added) NetAssessment
$e,o92.m
{s1,460.791
s7,6"7,2a
97,6?L.2r
25 s305.25
Ctty ofFolsom
Slerru Estates landscaplng and Liahtina Dlstrid
Fund 231
2022-2?
Allocated Net As$ment to Plopertv
Net Assessment
single Family Equlvalent Beneflt Unib
Allocated Net Assessment to Property
bmoarisn of Net A$essm€nt and A$esmeht
allocated Net A$essment to Propefry
Allocated asse$ment to Property
Per Parcel S!rplus (+l or Detlclt G)
{S3os.2s}
s353.68
$s8.43
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SGlOonrultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Sierra Estates - lnstallment Summary
District: Sierra Estates
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
s24,919
S7.soo free replacement
So So So s7.500 Totals: 9c S( So $o
LonE Term lnstallment Summary
so So So s0 So $o So $o fotals:

City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022'23
SClGoneultlngGtoup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

sto rting Fu nd Baldnre (os of Apdl 2o2)
Btimdted ReseNe to linonce opptox. first 6 months of 22'23 (586,4!.7s1
(S2o820.78)
Cltyof Folsom
WlllowCreek Etates East bndseplngand Ughtlng Dlstdd
Fund u9
202-8
General Malntenance Cosb

2. Unscheduled

3. StreetliShts

4. Irrigatlon
so.@
so.m
so.m
So.m
seNice CosB

5. 5.

Eledil€l 911"m.m
s1tm.m
Currcnt Ycar lmorov€ment Paol€G

7. No planned projeds So.m
so.@ _
subtotal s25,m.m
a. Professional SeNices (Enaineel! Reportand lP)

9. Contradseruices (all othercontrads and serulc€s)

10. Publlcations/Malllngs/communletions

11. Staff

12. Overhead

13. countyAuditorFee
S7so.m
So'm
So.m
50m
52,446.6
so.m
Subtobl $,1$.m
ToEl lmprcv€mentCoss sp,19o,m
Assessment perSinAl€ Family Equivalent
Single Family Equlvalent Benefit Un;ts
Se.40
747
$@,o5&e
short-Term lnstallment Plan (previously colleded)
ronC-Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously colleded)
Short-Term lnstallm€nt Plan (coll€ded thls year)
tonS-Tem lnstallment Plan (colled€d this Year)
Tobl lnstallmentCos
so.@
s34m.m
Som
so.m
$4m.m
Total lmprovementcosts
Subtotal
Total Avallable Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contributions f rom other sourc€5
Net Balance
s5qos8.80
($29,xs.m)
s3O,gil.80
{s132898.s7)
l'rc7,oze.77l
{$4m.m}
So@
l9L4t,oze.77l
Dlstrld &lanco (surptus lr+; deflclt ls 0l tsL4t w.nt
ss,0s8.e
Surplus orDeflcit (surplus is subtraded; deficlt ls added) SMLOE.D $2o!ru.57
Alloated Net Assessmentto Prcoefrv
NetAssessment
Slncle Famlly Equivalent Benefit units
Allodt€d Net Assessment to PropedY
$Dr,M.s7
7&
S2s.19
Comoeilson of N€tAsessment and Assessment
Alloeted Net &s6ssment to PrePerty
Alloeted &s€ssment to ProP€rtY
PerParel surplus (+) orDetlclt(-l
($269,!e)
Ss'€
(s188.D1
rFtrndsfrom fund balance
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClGonsultingGnrup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

Willow Creek Estates East - lnstallment Summary
District: Willow Creek Estates East
Fiscal Year: 2022-23
Fund Balance (2022) $Ls3,7671
Short Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: so So So $o $o So So $o
Long Term lnstallment Summary
Totals: $o SO SO $o So $o So So
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
SClOon*ultlngGroup

05/10/2022 Item No.12.

sturting Fund Balance (os of Aptil 2022)
Estimated ReseNe tofinance dpprcx. li6t 6 months of22-23 sa23,634.47
1534,273.77t
Clty of Folsom
wllow cr€ek Estates East No. 2 landseping and Lightlng olstrid Fund 284
2022-23
Gen€ral Maintenance 6$s

1. scheduled

2. Unscheduled

3. Streetlighb
S4qooo.oo
s20,oo0.00
91s,ooo.oo
Serulce 6ns

4. Electdcal $o.o0
$o.oo
Current Year lmprovenent Prolects

6. Pruning. plantina, flow sensor installation 9so,ooo.oo subtotat oJ ttem z --Jl6i6oi6-
Subtotal 9lrs,om@

7. a.

9. 10.

IX.

12. Setuices (Ensineer's Repod and lP) STso.oo
so.0o
5o.oo
$13,7A9.0O
S971.oo
s40.00
Conl€ct Seruices (all othercontracts and seruices)
Publications/Mailings/Communications
Staff
countyAuditor Fe€
subtotal s15,95O.O0
Total lmprovenent 6ss 914O,9sO.OO
&sessm€nt per Single Family Equivalent
single Family Equivalent Eenefit Unlts
Total Asessment
s103.51
74t.46
s76,78,Ot
short-Term lnstallment Plan (previously collected)
Long-Term lnstallment Plan (prevlously coll€cted)
Shon-Term lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Long-Tem lnstallment Plan (collected this year)
Total lnnallment cons
so.00
So.m
s0.m

90.m
So.oo
Tobl lmp.ovement Costs
Subtobl
Total Available Funds
Total Funds
Total lnstallment cost
contdbutlons from other sources
Net Balance
576,74A,0a
(914O,9SO.O0)
(s642o1.9s)
S89,360.70
s25,158.71
So.oo
So.oo
s2s,1s8.71
Dl$dct Balance ($rplus ls +; deflclt ls ()) 92s,1s8.71
976,74.01
Sunlus or Deficit (suQlus is subtEcted, deflclt is add€d) l32s,1s8.71l ss1,s89.30
ss1,sag.30
74t
s59.S8
Allocetcd Net Asessment to Propenv
Net tusessment
single Family Equivalent Benefit Unib
Allocated Net assessment to Property
6hoarlson ol Net Asse$ment and A$essment
(S6e.s8l
--!g!rS33.93
Allo.ated As$Jnent to PropeftY
Per Parcel surplus (+) or Detlclt G)
City of Folsom
Landscaping and Lighting Districts
Engineer's Report, FY 2022-23
$ClGonsultingGroup