1 Agenda
City Council Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers | 50 Natoma Street, Folsom CA 95630 May 10, 2022
6:30 PM
Welcome to Your City Council Meeting
We welcome your interest and involvement in the city’s legislative process. This agenda includes information about topics coming before the City Council and the action recommended by city staff. You can read about each topic in the staff reports, which are available on the city website and in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is also available to answer any questions you have about City Council meeting procedures.
Participation
If you would like to provide comments to the City Council, please:
Fill out a blue speaker request form, located at the back table. Submit the form to the City Clerk before the item begins. When it’s your turn, the City Clerk will call your name and invite you to the podium. Speakers have three minutes, unless the presiding officer (usually the mayor) changes that time.
Reasonable Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
How to Watch
The City of Folsom provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting:
In Person Online On TV
City Council meetings take place at
City Hall, 50 Natoma Street
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the city website,
www.folsom.ca.us
Watch live and replays of meetings on
Sac Metro Cable TV, Channel 14
More information about City Council meetings is available at the end of this agenda
2 City Council Regular Meeting
Folsom City Council Chambers
50 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA
www.folsom.ca.us
Tuesday, May 10, 2022 6:30 PM
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor Sarah Aquino, Councilmember YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Members of the public wishing to participate in this meeting via teleconference may participate either online or by telephone via WebEx.
Meeting Number: 2556 306 6030
Meeting Password: 05 10 2022
Join the meeting by WebEx online:
To make a public comment using the WebEx online platform, please use the “raise hand” feature at the bottom center of the screen. Please make sure to enable audio controls once access has been given by the City Clerk to speak. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
Join the meeting by WebEx telephone: Dial 1-415-655-0001 To make a public comment by phone, please press *3 to raise your hand. Please make sure to enable audio controls by pressing *6 once access has been given by the City Clerk to speak. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
Verbal comments via virtual meeting must adhere to the principles of the three-minute speaking time permitted for public comment at City Council meetings.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers: Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Howell https://cityoffolsom.my.webex.com/cityoffolsom.my/j.php?MTID=mb77cd538f3f221303a14ced4efa2b48f
3 The City Council has adopted a policy that no new item will begin after 10:30 p.m. Therefore, if you are here for an item that has not been heard by 10:30 p.m., you may leave, as the item will be continued to a future Council Meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AGENDA UPDATE
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item within the Folsom City Council's subject matter jurisdiction. Public comments are limited to no more than three minutes. Except for certain specific exceptions, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda.
SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming May 15-21, 2022 as National Police Week in the City of Folsom
2. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Proclaiming May 15 through May 21, 2022 as "National Public Works Week" and May 18, 2022 as "City Works Day" in the City of Folsom
3. City Manager's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Third Quarter Financial Report
4. Presentation of the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Public Financing Authority
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
5. Approval of April 12, 2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
6. Approval of April 26, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes
7. Resolution No. 10839 – A Resolution of the City Council Ratifying the City Manager’s Authorization for Emergency Replacement of the On-Site Fuel Tanks at the City of Folsom Corporation Yard, Determining the Project is Exempt from CEQA, and Appropriation of Funds
8. Resolution No. 10840 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision
9. Resolution No 10841 – A Resolution Ratifying the City Manager’s Execution of a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus Inc. for a Ladder Truck from Pierce Manufacturing Inc. Pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.150, and the Approval of an Interfund Loan and Appropriation of Funds
10. Resolution No. 10842 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with McGuire and Hester for Construction of the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project and Appropriation of Funds
11. Resolution No. 10843 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Inferrera Construction Management Group, Inc. for Construction Management and
4 Inspection Services for the Water Treatment Plant Backwash and Recycled Water Upgrades Project
12. Resolution No. 10844 – A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and Setting Public Hearing for American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge II/Reflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
13. Resolution No. 10845 – A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding Agreement (Contract No. 174-21 20-062) with the Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority for the Southeast Connector Segment D3(A) Bike Trail and Appropriation of Funds
14. Resolution No. 10846 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Design and Consulting Services Contract with Bennett Engineering Services, Inc. for the East Bidwell Street/Iron Point Road and US50 Onramp Improvement Project and Appropriation of Funds
15. Resolution No. 10847 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Change Order for the Pedestrian/Bike Trail with Goodfellow Brothers, LLC (Contract No. 174-21 20-060) for the Capital SouthEast Connector Segment D3(A), Project No. PW1607, Federal Project No. 5288(046)
16. Resolution No. 10848 – A Resolution Adopting a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2022-23 to be Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act
17. Resolution No. 10850 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 1C South Village No. 4 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 1C South Village No. 4 Subdivision
PUBLIC HEARING:
18. Appeal by Igor Semenyuk of a Decision by the Historic District Commission Denying a Conditional Use Permit for the Lakeside Memorial Lawn Crematorium project (PN 19-182) located at 1201 Forrest Street (Continued from April 26, 2022)
19. Folsom Corporate Center Apartments – South Side of Iron Point Road, East of the Intersection of Iron Point Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (PN 21-120)
i. Resolution No. 10849 - A Resolution to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve a General Plan Amendment, and Approve a Planned Development Permit for the Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Project
ii. Ordinance No. 1327 – An Uncodified Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Designation for a 7.24- acre Parcel (Lot 1) from M-L PD to R-4 PD and to Amend the Zoning Designation for a 4.68-acre Parcel (Lot 6) from BP PD to R-4 PD for the Folsom Corporate Center Apartments Project (Introduction and First Reading)
5 OLD BUSINESS:
20. Resolution No. 10831 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving an Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for Construction of the 75-unit Bidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project, and Appropriation of Funds NEW BUSINESS:
21. Ordinance No. 1326 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving the Folsom Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy in Compliance with Assembly Bill 481 (Introduction and First Reading)
22. Consideration of Letter in Response to Demand Letter Received from Scott Rafferty Regarding Alleged Non-Compliance with the Brown Act
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Members of the public are entitled to directly address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice of this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address Council on an issue, which is on this agenda, please complete a blue speaker request card, and deliver it to a staff member at the table on the left side of the Council Chambers prior to discussion of the item. When your name is called, stand to be recognized by the Mayor and then proceed to the podium. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item of interest to the public, when the Mayor asks if there is any “Business from the Floor,” follow the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three minutes or less.
NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS: Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.
As presiding officer, the Mayor has the authority to preserve order at all City Council meetings, to remove or cause the removal of any person from any such meeting for disorderly conduct, or for making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks, using profanity, or becoming boisterous, threatening or personally abusive while addressing said Council, and to enforce the rules of the Council.
PERSONS INTERESTED IN PROPOSING AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SHOULD CONTACT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The meeting of the Folsom City Council is being telecast on Metro Cable TV, Channel 14, the Government Affairs Channel, and will be shown in its entirety on the Friday and Saturday following the meeting, both at 9 a.m. The City does not control scheduling of this telecast and persons interested in watching the televised meeting should confirm this schedule with Metro Cable TV, Channel 14. The City of Folsom provides live and archived webcasts of regular City Council meetings. The webcasts can be found on the online services page of the City's website www.folsom.ca.us.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a person with a disability and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
6 Clerk’s Office at (916) 461-6035, (916) 355-7328 (fax) or [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible and at least two full business days before the start of the meeting.
Any documents produced by the City and distributed to the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the City Clerk’s Counter at City Hall located at 50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California and at the Folsom Public Library located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom, California during normal business hours.
PROCI-AMATION
OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAIMING MAY 15 - 212o22
as
NATIONAL POLICE OFFICERS MEMORIAL WEEK
in the City of Folsom
WHEREAS, in 1962, President Kennedy proclaimed May 15 as National Peace Officers Memorial Day National Police Week pays special recognition to those law enforcement officers who have lost their lives in the line of duty for the safety and protection of others; and
WHEREAS, there are more than 800,000 law enforcement officers serving in communities across the United States, including 79 sworn members of the City of Folsom Police Department who work devotedly and selflessly on behalf of the citizens of the City of Folsom, regardless of the peril or hazard to themselves; and WHEREAS, since the first known line of duty death in 1786, more than 23,000 law enforcement officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice; and WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, which was dedicated in 1991 in Washington, D.C.; and
WHEREAS ,
in 2021458 federal, state, tribal and local law enforcement officers died in the lineof-duty. This was an increase of 55o/o from the 295 officers killed in 2020, and is the highest total line-of-duty officer deaths since 1930 when there were 312 fatalities; and
WHEREAS, the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty will be honored, and the names of 619 officers newly engraved on the Memorial will be formally dedicated, during the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund's 34th Annual Candlelight Vigil, to be held on the evening of Friday, May 13,2022; and WHEREAS, May 15, 2022 is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all the fallen officers and their families.
NOW, THEREFORE, l, Kerri M. Howell, Mayor of the City of Folsom, on behalf of the Folsom City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of May 15- 21, 2022 as National Police Week in the City of Folsom and publicly salute the service of law enforcement officers in our community and communities across the nation.
PROCLA| MED this 1Oth day of May 2022
Attest:
Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR Lydia Konopka, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
05/10/2022 Item No.1.
This page is intentionally left blank.
05/10/2022 Item No.1.
PROCI-AVTATION
OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM
PROCLAIMING May 15 through May 27.r 2o.22
as
"National Public Works Week" and May r.8, zozz as "City Works Day" in the City of Folsom
WHEREAS, public works services provided in the Folsom communi$ are an integral part of our residents' everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, informed residents are vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as traffic engineering, street maintenance, storm drainage, solid waste collection, recycling, and hazardous materials; and WHEREAS the health, safety, and comfort of this community greatly depends on these operational services; and
WHEREAS, the quality of these programs combined with their planning, design, and construction, are vitally dependent on the skills of City of Folsom staff and officials; and WHEREAS, the Folsom City Charter and Folsom Municipal Code encourages broad, informed public participation in civic affairs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom seeks and encourages advice and input from the public on matters related to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to provide information to the public about municipal operations; and
WHEREAS City Works Day is designed to inspire residents to discover the City of Folsom's wide variety of services and programs, and community members are invited to attend the event:
NOW, THEREFORE, l, Kerri M. Howell, Mayor of the City of Folsom, on behalf of the Folsom City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of May 15 through May 21,2022 as "National Public Works Week" and May 18, 2022 as "City Works Day" in the City of Folsom, and call upon community members to acquaint themselves with the complexities of providing public works and to recognize the contribution that Public Works and other City departments make daily to the health, safety and comfort of our residents.
PROCLAIMED this 1Oth day of May 2022
Kerri M. Howell, MAYOR
Attest:
Lydia Konopka, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
05/10/2022 Item No.2.
This page is intentionally left blank.
05/10/2022 Item No.2.
tr-{-f 1.-i&$t I
&, ttraOl.ri ar !ntl{a
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
RECOMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Third Quarter Financial Report.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.
The Financial Report for the third quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 is an analysis of the unaudited financial status of the City's major funds, covering the nine-month period from July 2021through March 2022. Please refer to the Appendices of the report for detailed schedules of the City's key funds for the period ended March 31,2022.
POLICY / RULE
Section 5.05R of the Charter of the City of Folsom requires the City Manager submit to the City Council a financial and management report showing the relationship between budgeted and actual revenues, and expenditures and encumbrances on a quarterly basis.
Section 3.02.050 (b) of the Folsom Municipal Code states ".... within 30 days after the end of each quarter during the fiscal year, and more often if required by the City Council, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a financial and management report." 1 MEETING DATE: slt0l2022
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: City Manager's Fiscal Year 2021-22Third Quarter Financial Report
FROM: Finance Department
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
ANALYSIS
Economic Update:
As of March 2022, unemployment was 4.2%o and 4.0Yo in California and Sacramento County respectively and in Folsom, the unemployment rate was 2.7%. As a comparison, in March 202l,the unemployment rates were 8.2Yoin Califomia, 7.3Yoin Sacramento County and4.5Yo in Folsom. A comparison of home sales during the third quarter of FY 202I-22 and FY 2020- 21 shows the number of homes sold decreased by 141 or 18.26%. The average median sales price through the third quarter of FY 202T-22 was $162,500 which is an increase of 23.l1Yo over FY 2020-21. The number of home sales continue to decline, most likely due to increasing interest rates.
General Fund:
Fiscal Year 2021-22 is cwrently projected to end the year with a General Fund unassigned fund balance of $22.98 million. As a comparison, the unassigned fund balance in FY 2020-21 was $19.20 million. The unassigned fund balance as a percentage of expenditures is projected at23.38Yo for FY 2021-22 and for FY 2020-21, it was 21.38%. It is important to note that the
23.38% for FY 2021-22 is inflated when it is compared to the artificially low level of expenditures related to cuts due to COVID-19.
Fiscal Year202l-22totalprojected revenues of $102.77 million is an increase of $7.18 million, or 7.5lo/o over the prior fiscal year, and a projected increase of $7.83 million, or 8.25Yo over FY 2021-22 budgeted revenues of $94.94 million. The increase is seen mostly in charges for services and sales tax and is due to continued recovery from the COVID-l9 related impacts.
The budgeted revenues were projected prior to the reopening of services and venues due to the pandemic and the reopening occurred sooner than anticipated.
Property tax received through the third quarter of the fiscal year was $16.25 million and compared to the prior fiscal year is an increase of $594,000 or 3.l9Yo. The current projection is for property tax to end the fiscal year with a slight increase of $500,000 over the budgeted amount of $32.49 million, for $33.01 million. Compared to the prior fiscal year this would be an increase of $1.76 million or 5.62Yo.
Sales tax is projected to end the hscal year at $27.01 million, an increase of $2.46 million over the budgeted amount of $24.55 million or 10.00%. This is due to a better than expected recovery from the impacts of COVID-l9. However, when compared to the results for FY 2020-21sales tax revenues of $25.85 million, this is only a 4.49% increase year over year.
Through the third quarter, charges for services were $11.84 million and the current projection for the end of FY 2021-22 is $16.05 million. The projection of $16.05 million is an increase from the $9.84 million budgeted and an increase from the $13.87 million received in the prior year. The increase over the budgeted amount is mostly related to better than expected Parks and Recreation revenues, up $2.92 million over the budgeted amount, due to increased program 2 Page 12
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
activity after the re-opening of programs that were discontinued or limited due to COVID-19.
Also, development charges are projected to be tp $2.29 million over the budgeted amount due to a faster pace of development in the Folsom Plan Area than projected and charges in Police and Fire are up $749,000. Charges in the Public Safety Departments include estimated reimbursements from the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for wildfire strike teams. The year over year comparison of charges for services show the Parks and Recreation fees are projected to increase by $2.06 million from the $1.93 million received in FY 2020-21.
Development charges are projected to increase by $887,000 when compared to the prior year and Public Safety charges are projected to decrease by approximately $300,000 mainly due to reduced reimbursements from CalOES.
Fiscal Year 2021-22 total projected General Fund expenditures are $98.29 million, $3.35 million (3.53%) more than the appropriated amount of $94.94 million. The projected expenditure total includes increases in overtime of $2.00 million in public safety, contracts of $1.76 million, an increase in services and supplies of $938,500 and an increase in capital outlay of $648,600. The increase in overtime in public safety is partially offset by reimbursements from CalOES. The projected increase in all contracts is primarily in the Community Development Department ($1.96 million) and is mostly due to contract services related to the processing of permits and inspections of new development mostly in the Folsom Plan Area.
As a comparison, in FY 2020-21820 building permits were issued in the Plan Area. Through the third quarter of FY 2021-22,733 building permits have already been issued. Increases in capital outlay include ambulances, and vehicles for the Police Department and Parks and Recreation. The increase in capital outlay is due to additional vehicles purchased for the Police Department with funding from the American Rescue Plan Act. Services and supplies are continuing to increase as costs increase for most consumables like fuel and parts.
Utility Enterprise Funds
All three Utility Operating Funds are projected to end the fiscal year with operating revenues exceeding operating expenses. After capital expenses are included and comparing to Fiscal Year 2020-21 the unrestricted net assets are projected to decrease in Water by approximately $7.06 million, decrease in Solid Waste by approximately $1.2 million and in Wastewater the change in unrestricted net assets is projected to be flat. In the case of Water and Wastewater, the capital outlay is for capital projects and in Solid Waste, it is the purchase of replacement vehicles.
A year over year comparison of the fiscal year-end projection of expenses and revenues in the combined operating and capital funds shows charges for service revenues in Water are currently projected to decrease by $329,000 (1.80%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $3.11 million (24.68%). The increase in operating expenses is mostly seen in maintenance and contract costs. Wastewater Operating charges for services revenues are projected to increase by $150,000 (1.17%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $328,000 (6.47%). The increase in expenses in Wastewater is seen mostly in contract services.
Solid Waste Operating charges for services revenues are projected to increase by $3.80 million (25.02%) and operating expenses are projected to increase by $1.52 million (10.92%). a
-l Page 13
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
Increases in expenses are mainly due to employee and contract costs and the increase in the projected revenues is due to the recent increase in service rates. The increase in expenses and revenues in Solid Waste are both directly attributable to the regulations regarding food waste and the change in recyclables.
Submitted,
U* I
Elaine Andersen
City Manager
Tamagni
Finance Director/CFO
4 Page 14
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
F"OLS()M CITY OF
DISTINCTIVE 6Y NATURE
City of Folsom
Quarterly Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Third Quarter
May 10,2022
Prepared by the Office of Management and Budget
Financial Analysis and Reporting Division
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
Table of Contents
Section
Introduction
Executive Summary
Financial Results
a) General Fund...
b) Enterprise Funds..............
c) Other Funds
City Housing Fund
Risk Management
Lighting and Landscape Districts
Plan Area Impact Fees.......
Appendix
Combined General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement.....
General Fund Departmental Expenditure Summary
Housing Fund Revenue & Expenditure Statement
Lighting and Landscaping District Statement
Water Fund Revenue & Expense Statement............
Wastewater Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Solid Waste Fund Revenue & Expense Statement
Page No.
1 1
2 5
6 6
6 7
7 .8
.9
10 11
14 15
t6
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
Third Quarter Financial Report
Fiscal Year 2021-22 F"CIr.$CIed
Introduction
This financial report provides an overview of the City's unaudited financial position through the third quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2021-22 (July 1, 2021,through March 31,2022) for (l) the General Fund, (2) Housing SpecialRevenue Fund andL&LDistricts, (3) the major enterprise operating funds, and (4) the Risk Management Internal Service Fund. Notable cumulative third quarter to third quarter and budget to actual comparisons are included in this report in addition to yearend projections.
Executive Summary
During first three quarters of FY 2021-22, while still under the COVID-19 public health emergency, most restrictions have been lifted and the economy has started to rebound. Additional influences are causing economic changes. The rise in interest rates and the continued supply chain issues have started to cause costs to increase. The Parks and Recreation Department has continued to rebound with revenues exceeding the budget amount as programming increases to provide services to the community. Parks and Recreation programming revenues are now projected to end FY 2021-22 with an increase of $2.92 million when compared to the budget and $2.06 million when compared to the prior fiscal year. The City has received $4.19 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding of which approximately $2.2 million has been approved to be used for public safety, facilities and health and welfare, within the category of Provision of Government Services. The current projected year-end General Fund revenues are $102.77 million and projected expenditures are $98.29 million.
We project the General Fund's unassigned fund balance will increase from $19.20 million to $22.98 million at the fiscal year end. Below is a chart ofthe unassigned fund balance over the last ten years and displays the projected change from FY 2020-21to FY 2021-22.
Unassigned General Fund Balance
$30,000,000
$28.000.000
$26,000,000
$24,000,000
$22,000,000
$20,000,000
$l 8,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
30.00o/o
25.00%
20.00o/o
15.00%
10.00%
5.00Yo
FY13
Actual
FY14
Actual
FY1 5
Actual
FY16
Actual
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY1 9
Actual
FY20
Actual
FY2'I
Actual
FY22
Projected
23.380h
$22,977
$13,776,114
t4.44Vo
$19,200,703
21.38o/o $17,397,043
2O.09o/"
$15,529,576
19.gYo
$5,020,885
1.700h
0.00Vo
1
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
General Fund: Operating Revenues
The following table includes cumulative revenue comparisons through the third quarter of FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22 and a revenue budget comparison for FY 2021-22 with year-end projections.
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Trans ient Occupancy Tax
Charges for Services
License, Permits & VLF
Transfers In
All Other
Suhotal Revenue
CARES Act / ARPA
FY20-21 Actual
Nlar.3l,202l
$ 15,656,038
14,763,739
718,276
9,520,013
7,411,697
4,083,086
1,886,940
$ 53,039,790
1,007,649
FY 2l-22 Actual
Mar.31,2022
$ 16,249,998
15,921,650
1,368,351
11,844,469
7,752,394
4,214,980
2,024,958
Fv2t-22
Bu@et
$ 32,491,949
24,55t,790
2,000,000
9,839,240
1 1,916,184
8,393,1 78
3,550,200
Fv2t-22
Projected
$ 33,010,662
27,008,127
1,900,000
16,048,997
12,959,s04
6,008,753
3,635,327
Over/Under
Budget
$ 518,713
2,456,337
(100,000)
6,209,757
1,043,320
(2,384,425)
85,127
o/o of
Budget
l02Yo
1l0o/o
9s%
163Vr
72o/o
102%
$ s9,376,801 108.44%
2,19s,500
$ 92,742,s41
2,195,500
$ 100,571,370
2,195,500
$ 7,828,829
Total Revenue $61 t$ I $t02,166,870 $ 7 108.25Yo
General Fund operating revenues through the third quarter are $61.57 million, and 13.92yo above the same period in FY 2020-21. Revenues are at 64.86%o of the budget through the third quarter of the currentyear, primarily due to the timing associated with receiving some of the larger revenue sources. For instance, property tax is the largest General Fund revenue source, but funding is received in two installments, of which one has been received. The second installment will be received during the fourth quarter ofthe fiscal year.
The following is an explanation of the notable variances:
. Property tax revenues exceeded last year's cumulative third quarterby 3.79Yo or $594,000. The number of home sales from July through March was 631 and a decrease from the prior year of 141 sales (18.26%). The median sales price has increased by approximately 21.72%. The property tax revenue projection for Fiscal Year 2021-22year-end is $519,000 greater than the budgeted amount of $32.49 million, which would exceed the prior year by $ I .76 million or 5.62Yo.
. Sales tax revenues also exceeded last year's cumulative third quarter by 7 .84Yo or $ l . 1 6 million. During the time frame of July through December 2021, the categories of construction, business to business and the countywide pool show a decrease, all other categories show an increase when compared to the same quarter in the prior year. The categories of apparel stores, restaurants and department stores show increases due to relaxing of pandemic restrictions as consumers return to more normal spending patterns. The threat of a recession now looms in the future due to rising interest rates and higher costs.
Based on the latest sales tax forecast, sales tax is trending to end the year slightly above the budget at $27 .01 million, an increase from the prior year of $ I .16 million or 4.49oh. Below is a graph showing sales tax revenue for the current fiscal year and the past five fiscal years. This illustrates the trend of sales tax revenues leveling off.
2
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
30,000,000
25,000,000 $24,721,293
Sales Tax
$25,359,293
$22,294,827 $22,616,404
$25,846,985 $27,008,127
$24,551,790
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
Actual
FY17
Actual
FY18
Actual
FY19
Actual
FY2O
Actual
FY21
Budget
FY22
Projection
FY22
. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collections are at $1.37 million through the third quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year at $1.90 million, an increase of $542,500,39.96yo when compared to the FY 2021 amount.
The increase is attributed to reduced travel restrictions and the desire to travel. . Charges for services, including Building and Engineering fees, Parks and Recreation user fees, and Ambulance fees are at $11.84 million through the third quarter and are projected to end the fiscal year at $16.05 million.
The current projection is $2.17 million more than the prioryear amount of $13.87 million. The Parks and Recreation charges through the third quarter were $2.86 million and a comparison to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year shows an increase of $2.05 million. Ambulance fees through the third quarter were $2.82 million and compared to the prior fiscal year this is a slight increase of $9,500 or 0.34Yo. The projection for Ambulance Fees bt fiscal year-end is $4.40 million, which will be an increase from the prior year by $111,000 or 2.58oh. Community Development charges are at $4.29 million through the third quarter and are currently projected to end the fiscal year at $5.18 million. Compared to the prior fiscal year this would be an increase of $887,000 or 20.65%o. The projected increase in Community Development charges is due to an increase in engineering activity, mostly in the plan area, through the third quarter. . License and permit fees and Vehicle License Fees (VLF) quarter to quarter increased $448,000 and are projected to end the fiscal year at $12.33 million which would be an increase of $818,000 compared to the budget and an increase of $322,000 when compared to the prior year. The year over year increase is due to increased building permit activity mostly in the Folsom Plan Area, and a corresponding increase in VLF received. To provide a perspective of the building activity currently seen in the Folsom Plan Area, through the third quarter of FY 2021-22 there have been 733 building permits issued, compared to the prior fiscal year when there were 498 building permits issued through the third quarter. Also, business certificates are projected to decrease due to an approved business certificate suspension for small business in the current fiscal year. . Other revenues decreased 33.19% or $290,000, through the third quarter when compared to the prior fiscal year.
General Fund: Department Operating Expenditures
The following table includes cumulative third quarter actual expenditure comparisons for FY 2020-21and FY 2021-22 and an expenditure budget-to-actual comparison for FY 2021-22. a
J
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
Salaries
Benefits
o&M
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
FY20-21 Actual
Mar.3l,2O2l
s 29,361,782
19,995,493
13,578,298
1,559,730
901,381
FY 2l-22 Actual
lvlar.3l,2022
$ 30,793,804
19,672,941
17,378,492
1,t95,832
496,30s
FV2l-22
Bu@et
40,241,757
27,569,671
23,263,237
3,080,227
Fv2t-22
Projected
$ 41,23s,757
26,472,971
26,069,836
3,728,859
783,t49
Over/Under
Bu@et
$ 994,000
(1,096,700)
2,806,599
648,632
o/o of
Bu@et
l02.5Vo
96.0Y"
112.lyo
12l.lYo
100.j%o
$
783 149
Total Exnenditures $ 65,396,634 s 69,537,373 $ 94,938,041 S 98,2n;72 $ 3,352,531 lO3.5o/o Overall, cumulative third quarter General Fund expenditures increased 6.33% compared to the prior year. This is in part due to the increased appropriation from the ARPA funding and an increase in temporary salaries in Parks and Recreation due to programs resuming. General Fund expenditures are coming in aL 73 .25o/o percent of the budget through the third quarter of FY 2021-22. The projection for the end of the fiscal year is for expenditures to be at $98.29 million which would be $3.35 million more than the budgeted amount or 103.53o/o of budget. The projected increase to expenditures is primarily due to an increase in services and supplies, contracts and capital outlay.
The table below shows a comparison for FY 2020-21and FY 2021-22 for each General Fund Department.
The following is an explanation of the department specific variances of year-end projections as compared to the budget:
. Community Development department is projected to end the fiscal year $1.94 million (34.52%) over the budgeted amount, which is mostly due to increases in contract costs that are mostly offset by increased revenues.
. Firedepartmentisprojectedtoendthefiscalyear$2.37 million(10.51%)overthebudgetedamount,whichrs mainly seen in overtime costs, vehicle maintenance and capital outlay. Overtime costs have been impacted by employees out after an exposure to COVID-19, wildfire strike teams, retirements and multiple long term vacancies. Capital outlay costs are due to the purchase of an additional two ambulances and will depend on if those ambulances are completed during the current fiscalyear. Due to shortages of parts and computer chips, these costs may not materialize until next fiscal year. . Non-Departmental is projected to end the fiscal year $ 1 .43 million over the budget amount, which is mainly due to an increase in contract costs and the approval ofreplacement ofthe fuel tank at the corporation yard.
Overall General Fund departments' expenditures are trending at budget (in line with the 75Yo expectation) at this point in the fiscalyear.
4 City Council
City Manager
City Clerk
City Attomey
Mgmt & Budget
Human Resources
Police
Fire
Community Dev
Parks & Recreation
Library
Public Works
Non-Deptartmental
FV20-21 Actual
Mar.3l,2021
s 77,414
851,330
505,666
717,258
3,808,555
454,341
17,726,982
17,378,597
4,832,403
9,929,582
1,329,431
5,194,412
FY2l-22 Actual
NIar.3l,2022
$ 79,063
855,075
44s,st9
735,706
3,717,337
451,691
17,954,661
17,879,688
5,359,856
11,099,354
1,276,043
5,626,462
4,051,919
FY2l-22
Budget
$ 116,141
1.303,034
596,133
1,058,985
5,399,728
846,494
25,313,486
22,526,257
5,629,217
15,688,345
1,930,397
8,355,071
6,174,753
FV2t-22
Projected
s 107,241
1,1 93,034
601,633
1,001,985
5,262,527
625,494
24,754,986
24,893,757
7,572,217
15,053,977
1,759,397
7,870,571
7,604,753
Over/Under
Bu@et
$ (8,900)
(120,000)
5,500
(57,ooo)
(137,20r)
(221,000)
(558,500)
2,367,500
1,943,000
(634,368)
(172,000)
(484,s00)
l,43o,ooo
o/o of
Budget
92.3Yo
90.\',yo
l009Yo
94.6Yo
97.5y:o
73.9Yo
97.8Yo
1l0.5Yo
134.5Yo
96.jYo
9l.lo
94.2Yo
7ll 123.2v,
Total $ $ $ I s 1 l03.5Yo
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
Enterprise Funds:
Water Fund
The Water Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the following funds: Water Impact, Water Operating, Water Capital and Water Meters.
The table below includes cumulative third quarter actual revenue and expense comparisons for FY 2020-21and FY 2021-22 and a budget to actual comparison for FY 2021-22 for the Water Operating Fund.
W 20-21 Actual
NIar.3l,202l
FV 2l-22 Actual
lllar.3l,2022
FY2l-22
Bu@et
Fv2t-22
Projected
Or'er/Under
Budget
oh oI
Budget
Program Revenues $ 12,105,211 $ 12,036,043 $ 17,865,000 $ 17,915,000 $ 50'000 l003yo Salaries
Benefits
Operating Eryenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
2,212,931
1,651,683
3,500,621
668,248
2,273,681
1,622,651
3,901,037
676,248
7,623
3,215,801
2,273,758
7,971,887
1,705,800
1,892,985
3,208,801
2,268,758
6,623,887
1,705,800
1,892,985
(7,000)
(5,000)
(1,348,000)
99.8%;o
99.\Yo
83.lYo
100.0%
100.0%
92.OYo
ll 175
$
$
8,044,658 $
$
8,481,240
1,784,082
$ 17,060,231
$ 16,311,634
$ 15,700,231
s 3,993,634
$ (1,360,000)
Capital Eryenses 2,005,874 $ (12,318,000) 24.5Yo
2l $
The Water Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $17.92 million. Total operating expenses, includingtransfersoutanddebtserviceareprojectedtoendtheyearat$15.70million, or92.0%oofbudget.Thisreduction from budgeted amounts is mostly due to savings from budgeted contracts not anticipated to be fully needed this fiscal year. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $3.99 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $19.27 million.
Wastewater Fund
The Wastewater Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Wastewater and Wastewater Capital Funds.
The Wastewater Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $8.63 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at $5.39 million, or90.10o/o of budget. This reduction from budgeted 5 FY20-21 Actual
Nlar.3l,202l
FV 2l-22 Actual
Mar.3l,2O22
FY2l-22
Budget
FY2t-22
Projected
Or,erlUnder
Budget
oh of
Bu@et
Program Revenues $ 6,349,791 $ 7,178,758 $ 8,525,154 $ 8,625,154 $ 100'000 101-77o/o Salaries
Benefits
Operating Epenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
1,t79,926
903,192
798,189
500,894
1,238,853
936,198
813,631
st6,566
1,733,816
1,296,782
2,191,084
725,198
1,665,816
1,267,782
1,735,084
725,198
(68,000)
(2e,000)
(456,000)
96.08Y"
97.76Yo
79.19Yo
100.00%
$
s
3,382,201
289,064
$
$
3,505,248
t,02t,t3t
$
$
$
5,946,880
16,951,123
$
$
$
5,393,880
2,036,123
- $ (553,000)
$ (14,91s,000)
90.70Yo
Capital Eryenses 12.OlVo
Worki I l6 t7
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
amounts is mostly due to savings in supply and maintenance costs. Total expenditures for capital projects are estimated to be $2.04 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $17.89 million.
Solid Waste Fund
The Solid Waste Fund is reported on a combined basis and includes the Solid Waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, and Solid Waste Plan Area Capital.
FV 20-21 Actual
Mar. 31, 202 I
FY 2l-22 Actual
Mar.31,2022
FY2I-22
Bu@et
FY2t-22
Projected
Over/Under
Bu@et
o/o of
Budget
Program Revenues $ 11,221,276 $ 15,689,748 S 16,241,410 $ 19,01 1,410 S 2,770,000 llT.lyo Salaries
Benefits
Operating Eryenses
Transfers Out
Debt Service
2,394,723
1,878,396
4,206,445
I,420,838
2,569,896
2,109,863
4,873,542
1,251,638
3,871,824
3,069,820
6,693,409
1,742,377
3,520,824
2,830,820
7,326,409
t,742,377
(35 1,000)
(23e,000)
633,000
90.90 92.2Yo
l09.5Yo
100.0%
0.0o/o
lOO.3Yo
Capital Eryenses
$
$
9,900,402
t,490,261
$ 10,804,939
$ 799,495
$
$
$
15,377,430
3,943,709
$ 15,420,430
s 2,093,709
$ 43,000
$ (1,850,000) 53.l%o
585
The Solid Waste Fund is projected to end the year with program revenues of $ 19.01 million. Total operating expenses, including transfers out, are projected to end the year at$15.42 million, or 100.3% of budget. The fund is curently projected to be slightly over budget mainly due to the increase in contract costs related to recycling and organics changes.
Total expenditures for capital outlay costs are estimated to be $2.09 million at year-end. The fund will end the year with projected working capital of $8.07 million.
Other Funds
City Housing Fund
The City Housing Fund as of March 31,2022 had a cash balance of $6,180,210. The City Council had also previously approved housing project loans in an amount up to $3.5 million for the Scholar Way project of which $2.75 million has now been disbursed.
Risk Management Internal Service Fund
The Risk Management Fund captures the activity associated with employee and retiree health, dental and vision insurance, workers' compensation, and liability insurance expense.
As of March 37,2022,the City has paid $5.58 million for health, vision, and dental insurance for active employees and $3.46 million for retired employees and $1.97 million for workers'compensation. Liabilitlz insurance payments were $2.45 million with an additional $760,000 for property premium. The total expenditures for FY 2022 are projected at $19.43 million, which is an increase from the prior fiscal year of $1.29 million, which is mostly seen in health insurance, workers compensation, and liability costs.
The projected ending unrestricted net position is $5.33 million, a $1.55 decrease from FY 2020-21 6
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
Lighting and Landscape Funds
There are 29 Lighting and Landscape (L&L) Districts in the City of Folsom. Each District has its own budget and maintenance requirements to maintain various types of assets ranging from shrub beds, mini parks, walls, fences, monument signs, streetlights, bollards, landscape lighting, inigation systems, artwork, a waterfall, walkways/trails, open space, trees, and electrical services.
Some activities that have taken place in the L&L's during this time period include:
District Proiect Date Cost
American River
Canyon North
Kinglet Ct retaining wall and swale
repair. March $3,870
Willow Creek Estates
East Entry Sien Replacernent February $5,643
Natoma Valley
Quigley Ct. plant replacement and
arbor mulch February $390
Willow Creek Estates
South Silberhom Plant Infill Project January $6,22s
Plan Area Impact Fees
Total Plan Area Impact Fees received through the 3'd Quarter of FY 2022was $14.33 million. Expenditures during the third quarter total approximately $712,000 in all Plan Area Impact Fee funds. Expenditures were for the final payment on the Corporation Yard property , Yz of a garbage ftuck, Yz of a streetsweeper, and design costs for trails, parks and the fire station.
7
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIXA
City of Folsomn California
Combined General Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended March 3 l, 2022
REVEI\ruESI
Tues:
Prope.ty
Sale And Use
Tmsient Occupancy
R@l Property Transfer
Franchise Fes
Other
Licenses And Pemits
lntergovemmental
Charges For Cunent Seruices
Fines And Forfeitures
Interest
Miscellmeous
Openting Transfers In
TOTAL REVEIYUES
EXPEIYDITTJRES:
Cufient Operating:
Genenl Govemment
Publio Safety
Public Ways and Facilities
Community SeNi@s
Culture and Recreation
Non-Departmenlal
Opentiog Tmsfers Out
TOTAL EXPNNDMURES
APPROPRIATION OF FTJ}TD BALANCE
F{JND BALAI{CE,JULY I
TIJIVD BALAIYCE
FY 2022
As of Fv io2t FY 2022
BIJDGET
VARIANCE
Forecst vs Budget
s o/r
5l 8,713
2,456,337
(100,000)
315,000
2,755
(100,000)
676,O83
367,237
6,209,757
t9,7t6
(124,000)
(28,344)
0,632,601)
1,852,000
(484,s00)
1,943,000
244,632
1,430,000
SAyo
lo4yo
94Yo
t3syo
l02o/o
l23o/o
lO3.5o/o
FY 2021
As of
313u202t
FY22 Fore6t
As of
313v2022
VARIANCE
Acutrl vs Budget
ACTUAL
$ 15,656,038
t4,763,139
7t8,276
394,926
2,135
390,966
2,951,186
5,468,161
8,520,013
92,065
134,039
872,409
4,083,086
$ t6,249,998
15,921,650
1,368,351
570,054
684,510
1,121,9t6
6,825,978
11,844,469
8E,356
98,931
583,106
8,960,028
35,612,403
5,626,462
5,359,856
9,866,705
4,051,919
3t,253,436 $
25,846,985
1,357,550
799,193
738,256
710,605
4,187,991
9,693,482
t3,874,002
155,554
69,5 l9
439,226
l 1,785,161
47,t03,313
7,044,s07
6,825,605
13,198,419
3,855,487
32,491,949
24,551,790
2,000,000
685,000
75 1,800
1,000,000
3,315,700
t0,795,984
9,839,240
140,000
230,000
743,400
8,393,178
94,938,041
33,0t0,662
27,008,t21
1,900,000
1,000,000
754,555
900,000
3,991,?83
tl,163,221
t6,048,997
159,716
106,000
715,056
(16,241,95t)
(8,630,140)
(631,649)
0 14,e46)
(751,800)
(315,490)
(t93,784)
(3,970,006)
2,005,229
(5r,644\
(r31,069)
(160,294)
500/o
6syo
680/0
83yo
Oo/o
68Yo
94Y6
63Yo
t20%
63yo
43%
78%
50%
65%
64o/o
75o/o
67o/o
95o/o
7s%o
66Yo
73%
l02o/o
llOYo
950/o
t460/0
1000/0
90%
12OVo
lO3o/o
163%
1t4%
46'/a
96%
'l2Yo
54,047,439 108.25Yo
8,714,432
34,957,t99
5,t94,4t2
4,432,403
9,107,526
2,590,11t
65,396,684
(1r,349,245)
15,697,62t
4,34E,317
(801,458)
(508,799)
$ 3,038,1 l9
(7,96s,072) 5,77r,80s
(310,673) (4s5,629)
13,986,204
47,56t,942
8,355,071
5,629,217
13,230,854
6,t74,753
94,%A,O4t
2l,469,426
21,469,426
(310,673)
704 $ 21,158J53
12,353,603
49,4t3,942
7,870,s71
't,572,217
t3,475,486
7,604,'t53
4,476,298
724
(310,673)
5,026,176
1 1,889,539
2,128,609
269,361
3,364,149
2,122,834
2t
NONSPENDABLE FUND BALANCE
Rf STRICTI D FUND BALANCE
COMMITTED FIJND BALAIICE
ASSI(]ITED r'tII\'D BALANCE
IJT\Rf, STRICTED FUND BALANCE
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX B
City of Folsom, California
Expenditure Summary - General Fund DepartmentsQuarter Ended March 37,2022 FY 2021
As of
3t3112021
FY 2022
As of
3/31/2022
FY 2021
ACTUAL
Fv 2022
BUDGET
FY22 Forecast
As of
3/31t2422
VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budset
$
VARIANCE
Actual vs. Budeet
$ o/"
EXPENDITIJRES:
City CouncilCity ManagerCity ClerkOffice of Mgmt & BudgetCity AttomeyHuman ResourcesPoliceFireCommunity Development Parks & RecreationLibrary
Public WorksOther
Non Departmental
Operating Transfers Out
$ 77,414 $
85 1,330505,666
3,808,555
717,258
454,341
17,726,98217,378,s97
4,832,4039,929,s82
1,329,431
5,194,412
79,063
855,075
445,519
3,717,337
735"706
457,691
17,954,661t't,879,688
5,359,856
1 1,098,3s4
1,276,043
5,626,462
104,t52
1,182,339
647,613
s,000,741
953,138622,182
23,564,62723,771,961
6,825,605
14"401,303
1,838"898
7,044,507
I t6,141
1,303,034
596,133
s,399,728
1,058,985
846,494
25,313,48622,526,257
5,629,217
15,688,34s
1,930,397
8,3ss,07r
107,241
1,183,034
601,633
5,262,52'.7
1,001,985
62s,494
24,7s4,98624,893,7s7
7,572,217
I { n{? o??
1,758,397
7,870,57 |
(8,900)
(120,000)
5,500
(137,201)
(s7,000)
(221,000)(5s8,500)
2,367,500
1,943,000
(634,368)(172,000)(484,s00)
v"
92.34yo $90.79yo
100.92Yo
97.46yo
94.62Yo
73.89%97.79yo
t10.s1%
734.52o/o
95.960/o9r.09%94.20Vo
(37,078)
(447,959)(r50,614)
(1,682,391)
(323,279)(388,803)
(7,358,825)(4,646,s69)
(269,361)
(4,589,99 I )
(6s4,3s4)
(2,728,609)
$ $ $ 68v^
66%
75o/o
69%
690/o54o/o
7lYo
79o/o
95Yo7|Vo660/o67o/o
2,590,711 4,05t,919
TOTAL EXPENDITURES: s 6s"396.684 $ 69"537"373
3,855,487 6,174"7s3 7,604.753 1,430,000 123.160/o (2,122,834) 66% s 89,812,552 $ 94,938,041 $ 98,290,572 S 3,352,531 103.53% $ (2s,400,668) 73o/o 9 Page 25
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX C
City of Folsom, California
Housing Fund
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended March 31,2022
REVENUES:
Tiles
Intergovemental
Chages for Cment Swices
lmpact Fee Revenue
Interest Revenue
Other Revenue
Operating Trmsfas In
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
Salary & Benefits
Seruices & Supplies
Contracts
Insumce
Other Operating Expenses
Capital Outlay
Exhotrdinary Loss on Dissolution ofRDAS
Operating Trmsfers Out
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATION OF F'UND BALANCE
FUND BALANCE, JULY I
FUND BALANCE
FY 2022
As of
3/3u2022
FY 202t
ACTUAL
FY 2022
BUDGET
FY22 Forecmt
As of
3/3v2022
VARIANCE VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget Actual vs Budget
$%$%
$
$
s
$
$
$
s
$
$
$
$ s
$
47,265
4,784,947
166,213
51,446
4,733,226
344,537
2,456,t2t
3,564,s73
16,418
29,167,730
(2,261,87s)
20,000
250,000
50,000
s5,385
37s,385
49,000
5,500,000
230,000
8,920,000
8,300
(3,14e,300)
730
26,018,430
(26,018,430)
29,000
5,250,000
180,000
(s5,385)
8,610,000
(32,000)
27,265
4,534,947
tl6,2t3
(s5,385)
(8,342,3 l6)
34,800
7 15 15390/0
245o/o
2200o/o
4600/o
0o/o
2549o/o
2360/o
19l4o/o
332o/o
0o/o
1332o/o
2477o/o
$
8,652,316
5,500
s 25,489,525
(2,261,87s)
l4 ll
(3,678,20s) 3,891,979
t67 730 751
3 10,000
40,300
350,300
25,085
29,t67,730
$ 29,t92,815
(2e,te2,81s)
2877o/o
27o/o
279|o/s
l4o/o
$
NONSPENDABLE T'UND BALANCE
RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
COMMITTED FUND BALANCE
ASSIGNID T'UND BALANCE
UNRESTRICTED ['UND BALANCE (DEFICIT) s $-
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping DistrictsRevenue and Expenditure StatementQuarter Ended March 31,2022 Revenues:
Special Assessment
InterestOther Revenue
Expenditures:
Commr.rnicationsutilitiesContractsMaintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund 204 Fund 205 Fund 207 Fund 208 Fund 209 Fund 210 Fund 212 Fund 213 Fund 214 Fund 215 Fund 231 Fund 232 Los Cerros
Briggs
Ranch
Natoma
Station
Folsom
Heishts
Broadstone
Unit 3 Broadstone
Sierra
Estates
Natoma
Vallev
Hannaford Lake Natoma Cobble llills Prairie Oaks
Cross Shores Reflect #2
23,394 46,135 96,561 I 1,660
152
t2,3lt
172
540
1,064
23,082
2r3,893
270
I 17,958
t,251
10,528
3-541
12,895
525
24,47'l 160,9't',|
t96
4,890
127
36,359
797 1,235
TotalRevenue $ 24,190 $46,135 $96,561 $11,812 $ 13,023 S 214,163 $14,069 $ 13,420 S 24,477 $ 16l,173 $ 5,016 537,594 2,6834,407 1,329
1,077 48,364 2,852
TotalExpenditures $ 34,399 $ 64,700 $168,192 $ 10,807 S 25,223 S 16'7,572 S 13,371 $ 11,355 S 43,770 $ 1,329 $ 4,773 S 31,188 8,76s
4,157
16,328
654
4,496
2,92',1
1,306
6,037
842
2,260
9,374
1,898
22,774
1,400
8.324
l,ln
577
1,899
165
1.022
2,508
6s2
20,762
423
6.842
12,595
5,825
32,643
t,120
12,5t9
5r,742
19,34254,726
13,506
28,877
6,024
2,713
1,452
6t7
848
564
11
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping DistrictsRevenue and Expenditure StatementQuarter Ended March 31,2022 Revenues:
Special Assessment
InterestOther Revenue
Expenditures:
CommunicationsUtilitiesContractsMaintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund 234 Fund 236 Fund 237 Fund 249 Fund 250 Fund 251 Fund 252 Fund 253 Fund 260 Ftnd262 Fund 266 Fund 267 Cobble
Ridoe
Praire Oaks Willow Creek Blue Ravine Willow Am River
Ranch Silverbrook East Oaks Steeplechase Creek So. Canyon No. 34,090
Willow
Snrinss
Willow Broadstone 3 ARC No.2
Snrss CFD#I1 CFD #12 CFD #13
8,057
6t7
I 1 1,040
270
20,048
557
13,974
401
89,744
3,439
50,09620,3993 1,8 13
6,164
8,179
23,858
1,779
12,85663,627
7,539
13,079
331,705
8,249
421
74,032
60,925
191,628
t6,14254,634
59,381 8,07s 63,289
523
TotalRevenue S 8,674 $ lll,3l0 $ 523 S 34,090 $ 20,605 $ 14,375 $ 93,183 $ 59,651 $ 8,101 $ 25,637 $ 339,954 $ 63,622 270 26 333
690
t,tl2
2,908
220
l-089
51,329
21,09395,335
9,410
49.727
468
3,761
2,t85
24 1.193
17,258
1,5t2
11,443
2,5t9
1.830
g 157
788
957
t4
1,122
3,884
r,482
12,597
273
3,645
27,278
13,892
5,4573,72s
4,5363,8 l6
356
l6l
1 1,405
6,116
34,167
17.024
TotalExpenditures $ 6,018 $ 226,894 $ 7,630 $ 34,562 $ 12,637 $ 21,882 $116,651 $ 50,351 $ 8,709 $ 97,100 g 39'7,'782 $ 68,872 12
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX D
City of Folsom, California
Lighting and Landscaping Districts
Revenue and Expenditure StatementQuarter Ended March 31,2022 Revenues:
Special Assessment
InterestOther Revenue
Expenditures:
CommunicationsutilitiesContractsMaintenance
Supplies
Transfers Out
Fund 270 Fund 271 Fund 275 Fund 278 Fund 281 Fund 282 Fund 283 Fund 284 Fund 285 Fund 288 Fund 289 Fund 291 ARC
No.2
Residences
ATARC
ARC
North #3
Blue Ravine
Oaks No.2
Folsom
Hts #2
Broadstone Islands
#4 CFD#16
Willow Creek
Estates #2
Prospect Maint Dist Maint Dist Maint Dist
Ridee CFD #18 CFD #19 CFD #23 Al
6,932
901
11,829
330
140,540
5,647
19,557
955
6,807
3,803
33,5 10
1,471
52,651
393
42,010
625
67,71432,609
375
I 1,070
21,840
2,1t4 97 4,546 2,273
7,9s6
578
9,072
6l'1
TOTAL
1,746,208
39,019
4,351
$ 1,789,579
581
597,686
332,338
1,024,317
98,906
341,606
TotalRevenue $7,832 $ 12,159 $146,187 $ 20,512 $34,981 S 53,045 $ 2,114 $ 42,635 $21,937 $ 4,546 S 2,273 $ 190
6,42s
473
209
1,677
63,459
1,868
15,554
2,440
t,144
9,393
923
4,698
5,305
)? 15)
254
4,6s6
40,095
r10,975
22,204
10,529
5,4204,113
50,235
2,546
I 1,519
1,407
552
4,800
259
4,079
98,383
7,218
105,694
1,95',11,758
97063s
$4;
357
TotalExpenditures $ 7,089 $ 18,599 S 82,767 $ 12,215 $ 33,566 $ 183,804 $ 73,833 $ 111,768 $ 11,096 $215,011 S 18,223 $ 1,697 $2,395'434 13
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX E
City of Folsom, California
Combined Water Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended March 31,2022
OPERATING REVENUf,S:
Charges For Seruices
TOTAI, OPERATING REVENIIES
OPERATING f,XPf,NSES:
Salaries
Benefits
utilities
Supplies
Maintenance and Operation
Contractual Sefrices
Depreciation
Other Operating Exp€nses
TOTAL OPf, RATING EXPENSES
OPERATING INCOME
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSES):
lmpact Fees
Other
Investment Income
Intergovemmental
Proceeds ofFinancing
Debt Service Expense
Other Reimbursements
Capital Outlay - Projects
FY 2021
As of
3/3v2021
FY 2022
As of
3t31t2022
Fv 2021
ACTUAL
FY 2022
BUDGET
FY2l For€cast
As of
313112022
VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget
s%
VARIANCE
Actual vs Budget
j
-,____
t2,tos,2tl
12,t05,211
t2,036,O43
2,930,059
2,3'1],,t04
879,769
981,1 l0
520,036
3,215,801
2,273,7s8
713,100
t,\97,390
I,089,757
, 2,089,956 3,923,209
: 4,450,702
: 1,,047,743
(7,000)
, (s,000)
2,000
: (138,000)
(l 84,000)
(1,192,000)
. 4,450,702
164,000
3,090,'t02
(210,000)
(r3,619,640)
(57,000)
r2,3 18,000
(t,sog,eqo)
l0o% . (5,828,957)
100% i (5,828,954
(942,12o)
(65 l, r 07)
(206,'176)
(533,587)
(261,603)
(2,658,082)
3,496,873
116% (410,804
589,357
17,865,000 17,915,000 : 50,000
17,865,000
67yo
12,036,043 6'1Vo a_____ r8,243;l!_ 17,915,000 50,000
l
2,2t2,931
1,651,683
501,44 I
't29,614
26'1,059
I,322,768
3,319,649
2,2'73,681
t,622,651
506,324
663,803
828,154
t,265,\27
3,496,873
63'7,629
3,208,801
2,268,158
715,100
1,0s9,390
905,757
2,'731,209
4,450,702
r,048,43 I t,212,43t
13,461,446
4,403,554
----A!67-',0!)-
100%
100%
to0%
88%
83%
'10%
123vo
3tyo
1 tyo
7 lYo
Ttyo
5syo
76yo
32yo
6't9,739
10,704,885
1,400,326
228,769
t3,364
t'l3,64'7
(r 1,175)
(2,0o5,874)
(r,601,269)
(200,942)
53,833
(668,248)
(614,415)
(8rs,3s7)
r02,364,566
t01,549,2t0
(3,490,7t9)
$ 98,058,491
tt,294,242 : 15,272,480 16,552,148
6tyo
849/o
741.80r 2,9'^,090 t,362,852
442,937
15,889
\22,803
(7,623)
(r.784.082)
268,819
5,068,659
75,078
455,908
690,225
13,644,640
272,000
r00,000
480,225
25,000
215,000
100,000
7Dyo
oyo
79Vo
100v.
(24't,288)
(13,628,7s2)
(149,t97)
(100,000)
640/o
lvo
4svo
ovo
fl ,21o,076)
(836,898) (1,892,985)
' 450,139 (16,311,634)
s,48t,764 (3,49'1,'154)
(r,892,985)
(3,993,634)
100% 1,885,362
24% .____14;nE:_
(s.066.394) l45yo 2,287,678
jyo
llYo
350/.
40yo
TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUE
(EXPf,NSE)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFOR.E CAPITAL
CONTRIBIITIONS AND TRANSFf, RS
CHANGE IN NET ASSf,TS
NET ASSf,TS, JULY I
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:
Transfers In
Transfers Out
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS
(468,274) 8,452,854 905,800 (3,'103,s42)
, 94,486 800,000
(e4fe1I (1,70s,800)
800,000
(6'16,248) (1,705,800)
(616,248) _______lq2!Lu (e05,800) (e05,800)
r0oo/o (800,000) ovo
(r,t44,s22)
109,978,103
7,6t3,544
: 102,364,559
i 109,978,103 109,978,103 (r,r+r,rD c,srtgr,
_!___pg.q:{! -!.__106,386,I!_
109,978,103 109,978,103
105,368,761
(3,s91,915)
$ 101,776,846
too% _____)w;E_
(4,609,f42)
NET ASSf,TS
RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
108,833,581
(3,591,e1s)
I]NRESTRICTED NET ASSETS $ 105,241,666
Includes the following funds: Water Impact Fee, Water Operating, Water Capital and Water Meters Prior year includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX F
City of Folsom, California
Combined Wastewater Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended March 31,2022
OPERATING REVENUES:
Charges For Senices
Prison Seruices
TOTAL OPERATING REVENIIES
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
utilities
Supplies
Maintenance and Operation
Contractual Services
Depreciation
Other Operating Expenses
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
OPERATTNG INCOME (LOSS)
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSES):
lmpact Fees
Investment lncome
Other
Debt Service
Capital Outlay - Projects
FY 2O2I
As of
3/3v202r
FY 2022
As of
3t3t/2022
FY 202r
ACTUAL
FY 2022
BUDGET
VARIANCE VARIANCE
Forecast vs Budget Actual vs Budget
$
FY2l Forecast
As of
3/31/2022
l
6,299,391 7,122,'l5a'. 8,407,529 8,457,954
50,400 56,000 ,_______67_200_ 6't,2OO
6,349,791 7,1'18,758 8,474,'129 8,525,t54
8,55'1,954 : 100,000
6't,2oo. -
.4. 4,625,t54 100,000
1,665,816 l
1,26'l,782 :'.
90,000 .:
281,464'
22g,t5o .
'180,760
2,22't,348
'11,920
I 38,000
60,000
(l l 5,000)
3,000
(13,990,929)
(2,036,123). l4,9l5,ooo
(r,766,203). 8t2,O7t
(72s,t98)
(725,r98)
(762,2'17)
68,969,695 .,
68,207,4t8 :
(1,025,604).1
s 67,181,814 .l
totyo (1,335,196)
100% _____ al,2oo)
rot% . (1,346,396)
(494,963)
(360,584)
(32,414)
(328,726)
(208,543)
(626,102)
1,735,638
84% : (181,669)
r32% , (497,363)
52V.
177,8t3
(134,884)
(33,288)
(t4,04t,696)
84%
83%
84%
7t%
64%
38%
45%
20%
1,179,926
903,192
60,63 I
176,060
t28,728
165,654
1,665,199
1,238,853
936,198
57,586
20r,'138
167,607
156,658
r,569,341
1,357,130
95,818
2'15,744
194,t84
41s,823
2,22'1,348
1,733,816
|,296,742
90,000
530,464
376,150
782,760
186,920
I 35,000
14,050,9_29
(16,95 l,l 23)
(2,578,2'14)
725,198
(68,000)
(29,000)
(243,000)
(147,000)
(2,000)
2,227,348
96%
98%
toovo
54%
6t%
IOOyo
1,735,638 :
267,tt6 230,042 42't,O0f 4t1,7to 34't,7tj (64,000)
4,546,506 4,724,3t9 : S,OZZ,ISZ 5,22t,682 6,896,030 ____1,67!;!3_ 1,803,285 2,454,439 t,852,33'1 3,303,4'12 t,729,t24
56%
90%
27.\yo
75%
0%
TOTAL NONOPf, RATING REVENUE
(EXPENSE)
31,642 52,037 39,835
t24,976 10t,'712 , 102,883
9,095 9,7-33 :, 3,r72,4_5O
(28e,064) (1,02r,131) ' (s66,353)
(123,351) (858,r50)t Z,tq}$ts
t,6'19,934 t,596,289 . 4,60t,t52
12%,,,_lt,e2e2e2 6%
69% 1,720,124 33%
(208,632) 24Ayo
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:
Transfers In
Transfers Out
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS
NET ASSETS, JULY I
30,133
(500,894)
(470,76t)
1,209,t73
65,009,255
66,218,424
(2,43't,465)
_!_i1l!!29i_
- 1 30,133
(s16,566). (670,845)
(516,566) , (640,7t2)
t,079,723 3,960,440
68,969,695 : 65,009,255
70,049,418. 68,969,695
(1,O25,604) .: (1,943,382)
$ 69,023,814 ,$ 67,026,313
(72s,t98)
(725,198)
68,969,695
68,969,695
(r,02s,604)
$ 67,944,O9t
NET ASSETS
RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS
* Includes the following funds: Sewer Operating and Sewer Capital Prior year includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
APPENDIX G
City of Folsomo Calilbrnia
Combined Solid Waste Funds*
Revenue and Expense Statement
Quarter Ended March 31 ,2022
OPERATING REVENUES:
Charges For Sewices
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
OPERATING EXPf,NSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Utilities
Supplies
Maintenance and Operation
Contractual Sefrices
Depreciation
Other Operating Expenses
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
oPERATING TNCOME (LOSS)
NONOPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSE):
Impact Fees
Investment Income
Intergovemmental Revenues
Other
Debi Seruice-Expense
Capital outlay
FY 2021
As of
313t/2021
FY 2022
As of
313U2022
EY 2021
ACTUAL
FY 2022
BUDGET
FY2l Forecast
As of
3l3l/2022
VARIANCE
F-*^t * Brdg"t
VARIANCE
Actual vs Budget
$
n1yo, (5st,662)
I
lt1yo (s5t,662)
t1,221,276 15,689,?48 I 15,206,531 16,241,410 19,01 1,410 2,'1'10,000 1t,22t,276 15,689,748 ' 15,206,531 16,24r,410 19,01 1,410 2,770,000 l
2,394,723 2,569,a96 3,151,620 3,8'11,824 3,520,824 (351,000) 1,878,396 2,t09,863 2,'12'l,9la 3,069,820 2,830,820 (239,000) 21,332 29,'tO'1 38,943 20,500 43,500 23,000
559,189 688,532 909,956 1,219,102 r,248,102 29,000
808,496 124,862 l,l 10,328 538,133 994,133 456,000
2,456,670 3,010,809 3,611,6'12 4,285,387 4,400,387 t 115,000 600,643 5'1',1,833 802,574 - 802j74 802,5'14
354,'158 419,632 549,205 630,287 640,28'l .
IO,OOO
9tv"
212yo
to2vo ,
t8s%
t03%
66%
69yo
t4s%
s6%
t35%
'to%
67V.
74%
97%
97%
20%
(l,3or,928)
(959,95't)
9,207
(530,570)
t86,729
(1,274,s',18)
57'1,833
9,080,208 10,r31,133 12,922,215 13,635,053 A,4aO,627 845,574 106% ' 2,284,316 2,606,35'l 4,530,783
55,000
(l,500)
(7s,000)
(2,01 8,076)
(2,093,'709) l,85o,ooo
(1,053,556),._ llq2,5?!I
t02% ' (210,6s5)
(3,s03,920)
t,050,92s
(77,928)
(39,672)
(106,104)
(2,074,4t3)
53./" 3,t44,214
122% 846,097
2,\41,068 5.558.615
271,335
43,6r7
498
175,565
433,412
42,328
51,993
253,879
456,683
t9,'t06
30,286
242,438
5l 1,340
82,000
158,097
2324,292
(3,943,709)
566,340 I 10.8%
98yo
53yo
13?/.
85%
s2%
33%
rt%
(1,490,261 )
(799,495)
TOTAL NONOPf,RATING REVENUE
(EXPf,NSE)
(9e9,246) (17,883) 749,1 t3 (863.980)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS
NET ASSETS, JULY 1
t,14t,822 5,540,'133 3,033,429 l,'142,3',1'1 3,477,227
.
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS:
Transfers In
Transfers f)ut
TOTAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
AND TRANSFERS
424,889
(1,420,838)
(ees,e4e)
v5,a14
(s,649,391)
(5,503,s18)
(893,28e)
_!_lg2!.!!l)_
- 421,089
(1,251,638). (1,783,148)
(t,2sr,638) , (1,356,0s9)
4,289,095 . 1,677,370
(3,972,023) (s,649,392)
3t7,072 : (3,972,023)
t).921 962\
_L_(rIo6j!2, s___Q,972.023)
(\,742,377)
(t,742,377)
l
l,'134,850.
(3,972,020)
(2,237,t70):
(2,923,962)
$ (5,16r,132)
(t,742,3'77)
(r,742,377)
(3,972,020)
(3,972,020)
(2,923,962)
$ (6,895,982)
______!!t2_ -2550/"
NET ASSETS
RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS
Includes the following funds: Solid Waste Operating, Solid Waste Capital, and Solid Waste Plan Area Capital Prior year includes prior period adjustment for GASB 68
05/10/2022 Item No.3.
_[''{3r-,#dll+l.
0i&trt6tt.0;1 *!i{i{a
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: sn0/2022
AGENDA SECTION: Scheduled Presentations
SUBJECT: Presentation of the City Manager's FY 2022-23 Proposed Operating and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Public Financing Authority
F'ROM: Finance Department
The City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 proposed budget will be presented. This budget will encompass the 12-month period from July 1,2022 through June 30, 2023 and will also include the Capital Improvement Plan.
Submitted,
Tamagni, Finance DirectoriCFO
I
05/10/2022 Item No.4.
This page is intentionally left blank.
05/10/2022 Item No.4.
Book 76 Page222
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
City Council Special Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, April 12,2022 6:15 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The special City Council meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding.
ROLL GALL:
Councilmembers Present Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent:
Participating Staff:
None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steve Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
ADJOURNMENT TO GLOSED SESSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:
1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Sheldon Sterling v. City of Folsom, Workers'Compensation Appeals Board Case Nos. ADJ12607032 and 4DJ12607033
Motion by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to adjourn to Glosed Session for the above referenced item. Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
REGONVENE
City Attorney Steve Wang announced that no final action was taken during Closed Session DRAFT - Not oficial antil approued fui the Ci| Council
05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page223
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m
SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Not oficial unril approued fui the Ciry Council Page 36 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page224
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
City Gouncil Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, April 12,2022 6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:31 pm with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Present: Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Rosario Rodriguez, Vice Mayor
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Councilmembers Absent: None
Participating Staff: City Manager Elaine Andersen
City Attorney Steve Wang
City Clerk Christa Freemantle
City Arborist Aimee Nunez
Senior Trails Planner Brett Bolinger
Parks and Recreation Director Lorraine Poggione
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
Public Works Director Mark Rackovan
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited
AGENDA UPDATE
City Attorney Steve Wang announced that items 8 and 14 had additional information, and item 16 was continued to May 1Oth.
BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR:
The following speakers addressed the City Council
DRAFT - Not fficial until approued b1 the Ciry Coundl Page 37 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page225
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
1. Jeanne Shuman and Beth Crokan regarding homelessness
2. Sharon Kindel regarding Hinkle Creek Nature Center
3. Janine Ferrer regarding SeeClickFix
4. Margie Donovan (via WebEx teleconference)
SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation of the Mayor of the City of Folsom Encouraging the Community to Become lnvolved in Arbor Day
Mayor Kerri Howell presented the proclamation to City Arborist Aimee Nunez.
2. Presentation on the Draft Active Transportation Plan (ATP) and Public Comment Senior Trails Planner Brett Bolinger introduced consultant Erin David from Alta Planning and Design who made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. Senior Trails Planner Brett Bolinger and Parks and Recreation Director Lorraine Poggione also responded to questions.
The following speaker addressed the City Council
1. Jim Kirstein
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
3. Approval of March 8,2022 Special Meeting Workshop Minutes
4. Approval of March 8,2022 Special/Regular Meeting Minutes
5. Approval of March 22,2022 Special/Regular Meeting Minutes
6. Resolution No. 10828 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement for Food and Beverage Concession at Lembi Community Park with the Folsom Athletic Association
7 . Resolution No. 10829 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (Contract No.172-21 18-009) Between the City of Folsom and the Sacramento Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Shelter Services
8. Resolution No. 10832 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Amendment with R.E.Y. Engineers, lnc. for the Riley Street Sidewalk Feasibility Study and Appropriation of Funds
DRAFT -Not fficial until approued bjt the Ciry Cowncil Page 38 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page226
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
9. Resolution No. 10833 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Sacramento County for Reduced Tipping Fees for Municipal Solid Waste at Kiefer Landfill
10. Resolution No. 10834 -A Resolution Authorizing the City Managerto Execute an Agreement with Sacramento County for Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program Services Provided to Folsom Residents at Sacramento County Owned Facilities 1 1 . Resolution No. 10836 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 10479 to Update the Building Valuation Data and Clarify its Use
12. Resolution No. 10837 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Brightview Holdings DBA Brightview Tree Care Services for Shaded Fuel Break Creation and Ladder Fuel Removal
Motion by Councilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to approve the Gonsent Galendar.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JOINT CITY GOUNCIL / FOLSOM RANCH FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING ROLL GALL: Council/ Board Members: Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell
PUBLIC HEARING:
13. Folsom Ranch Financing Authority City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No.1 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 a. Resolution No. 10835 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Authorizing the lssuance of the City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No. 1 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2022, the Execution of a First Supplemental lndenture Providing therefor, Authorizing the Execution of a Local Obligation Purchase Contract, and Authorizing Necessary Actions and the Execution of other Documents in Connection therewith
b. Resolution No. O08-Folsom Ranch FA - A Resolution of the Governing Board of the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Authorizing the lssuance, Sale and Delivery of not to exceed $17,000,000 Aggregate PrincipalAmount of City of Folsom Community Facilities District No. 23 (Folsom Ranch) lmprovement Area No. 1 Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series DRAFT - Not oficial until approued bjt the Ci4t Council Page 39 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book76 Page227
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
2022; Approving the Form and Substance of a Trust Agreement, Authorizing Modifications thereof and Execution and Delivery as Modified; Approving a Preliminary Official Statement, Authorizing Changes thereto and Execution and Delivery thereof and of an Official Statement to be Derived therefrom; Approving a Local Obligation Purchase Contract and a Bond Purchase Contract and Execution and Delivery of each; and Authorizing Related Actions Necessary to lmplement the Proposed Financing
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni made a presentation.
Mayor Kerri Howell opened the public hearing. Hearing no public comments, the public hearing was closed.
Motion by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, second by Councilmember Mike Kozlowskito approve Resolution No. 10835.
AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Councilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
Motion by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, second by Gouncilmember Mike Kozlowski to approve Resolution No.0O8-Folsom Ranch FA.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Board Member(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Howell NOES: Board Member(s): None
ABSENT: Board Member(s): None
ABSTAIN: Board Member(s): None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the joint City Council / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, the meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 7:33 pm.
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OLD BUSINESS:
14. Resolution No. 10838 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Updated Fiber Network lnstallation Agreement with SiFi Networks Folsom LLC for the lnstallation of a Fiber Optic Network in the City of Folsom Public Works Director Mark Rackovan made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council with Scott Bradshaw from SiFi responding to additional questions from the City Council.
DRAFT - Not ffidal until approued fut the Ci4t Coundl Page 40 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page228
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
The following speakers addressed the City Council
1. George Condon
2. Mike Reynolds
Motion by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez, second by Gouncilmember YK Chalamcherla to approve Resolution No. 10838.
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Gouncilmember(s):
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s):
Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Chalamcherla, Howell
15. Consideration of Expenditure of Funds from the American Rescue Plan Act and Direction to Staff
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
The following speakers addressed the City Council:
1. Michael Reynolds
2. Kathleen Cole
3. Jim Snook
4. Will Kempton
5. James Villa
6. Jerry Bernau
Motion by Councilmember Mike Kozlowski, second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to approve staffs recommendation of the distribution of funds.
There was discussion by the City Councilwith clarification provided by City Manager Elaine Andersen.
Aquino
None
None
AYES: Gouncilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s):
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):
Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Howell
Chalamcherla
None
None
16. Resolution No. 10831 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Folsom Approving an Affordable Housing Grant in the Amount of $588,265.55 to Bidwell Place, LP for Construction of the 7S-unit Bidwell Place Affordable Multifamily Project, and Appropriation of Funds
Item was continued to the May 1Oth City Council meeting DRAFT - Not oficial until approued fui the Ciry Council
05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page229
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
NEW BUSINESS:
17. Consideration of Letter in Response to Demand Letter Received from Scott Rafferty Regarding Alleged Non-Compliance with the Brown Act
City Attorney Steve Wang made a presentation.
Motion by Gouncilmember Sarah Aquino, second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to send the letter in response and to continue following the Brown Act as the Gity Gouncil always has.
AYES: Councilmember(s): Kozlowski, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Howell NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
CITY MANAG REPORTS
City Manager Elaine Andersen spoke of upcoming events: the 26th annual Spring Eggstrvaganzaandthe annual Community Service Day. She congratulated the City's Hazardous Materials Division who were recognized as a top leader in sustainability efforts She wished Fire Chief Ken Cusano a happy birthday.
GITY COUNGIL COMMENTS:
Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez commented regarding the recent Sacramento Transportation Authority Board meeting she attended, the upcoming spring and summer concerts at Zittel Amphitheater and she thanked dispatchers for their service for Telecommunicators Week.
Councilmember YK Chalamcherla commented regarding a recent trip to Washington DC and the Historic District Revitalization meeting he attended. He requested future updates about the Bidwell Studios project and commented regarding his discussion with Congressman Bera regarding water. He stated he would like to eventually see illuminated stop lights in Folsom.
Councilmember Sarah Aquino reported about the Air Quality Management District meeting she attended. She suggested that the City send a letter in support of State surplus funds for a public safety training facility in our region.
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski spoke of the SACOG retreat he attended, a new art gallery in the Historic District behind Snooks, and an upcoming high school track meet.
Mayor Kerri Howell commented about the Regional Transit meeting she attended. She talked about traffic in Folsom and encouraged everyone to drive safely DRAFT - Not fficial until approued fu the Citlt Council Page 42 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page 230
Folsom City Council
April12,2022
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Kerri Howell adjourned the meeting at 8:55 pm.
SUBMITTED BY:
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Not fficial until approued b1 the Ci4t Coancil Page 43 05/10/2022 Item No.5.
This page is intentionally left blank.
05/10/2022 Item No.5.
Book 76 Page231
Folsom City Council
April26,2022
Gity Gouncil Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Tuesday, April 26,2022 6:30 PM
Mayor Kerri Howell announced that there was a technical glitch with Webex and those participating via Webex were not able to participate.
CALL TO ORDER
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 6:33 pm with Mayor Kerri Howell presiding.
ROLL GALL:
Councilmembers Present: Rosario Rodriguez, Vice MaYor
Sarah Aquino, Councilmember
YK Chalamcherla, Councilmember
Mike Kozlowski, Councilmember
Kerri Howell, Mayor
Councilmem bers Absent:
Participating Staff:
None
City Manager Elaine Andersen
Assistant City Attorney Sari Dierking
Deputy City Clerk Lydia KonoPka
Police Lieutenant Brian Lockhart
Assistant Planner Josh Kincade
Community Development Director Pam Johns
Public Works Director Mark Rackovan
CFO/Finance Director Stacey Tamagni
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited
AGENDA UPDATE
Mayor Howell announced that item 8 had additional information.
BUSIN FROM THE
DRAFT-Not fficial until approued @ the Ci4t Council Page 45 05/10/2022 Item No.6.
Book 76 Page232
Folsom City Council
April26,2022
The following speaker addressed the City Council:
1. Jack Henry regarding Placerville and Sacramento Valley Railroad SGHEDU LED PRESENTATIONS:
Resolution of Commendation Honoring 2BGlass for Receiving the 2021 Folsom Arts Achievement Award
Mayor Kerri Howell presented the proclamation to the owners of 2BGlass: Tate Bezdek, Aaron Bezdek and Ash Koss.
2. Presentation by the Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District This item was moved to a future meeting date due to the presenter not being able to phone-in because of a technical glitch with Webex.
GONSENT GALENDAR:
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. City Councilmembers may pull an item for discussion.
3. Approval of April 12, 2022 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Resolution No. 10839 - A Resolution of the City Council Ratifying the City Manager's Authorization for Emergency Replacement of the On-Site Fuel Tanks at the City of Folsom Corporation Yard, Determining the Project is Exempt from CEQA, and Appropriation of Funds
5. Resolution No. 10840 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision lmprovement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision
6. Resolution No. 10841 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus lnc. for a Ladder Truck from Pierce Manufacturing lnc., the Approval of an lnterfund Loan and Appropriation of Funds Motion by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez Councilmember second by Mike Kozlowski, to approve the Gonsent Galendar.
Motion carried with the following roll callvote:
AYES: Gouncilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Councilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s): None
1 DRAFT - Not offidal until approued b1 the Ci4t Council Page 46 05/10/2022 Item No.6.
Book 76 Page 233
Folsom City Council
April26,2022
NEW BUSINESS:
7 . Ordinance No. 1326 - An Uncodified Ordinance of the City of Folsom Approving the Folsom Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy in Compliance with Assembly Bill481 (lntroduction and First Reading)
Lieutenant Brian Lockhart made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council.
Motion by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez second by Gouncilmember YK Ghalamcherla, to introduce and hold the first reading of Ordinance No. 1326.
Motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
Mayor Kerri Howell called for a 15-minute recess at 6:58 pm while staff attempted to connect with Webex. She readjourned the meeting at 7:13 pm and explained that staff had connected with Webex and provided the new meeting information for the public to connect Mayor Howell explained that the City Councilwould proceed with Public Hearing ltem 8 but woutd also continue the item to the regular meeting on May 1Oth in order to ensure everyone unable to participate at this meeting would be able to at the next meeting.
PUBLIG HEARING:
8. Appeal by lgor Semenyuk of a Decision by the Historic District Commission Denying a Conditional Use Permit for the Lakeside Memorial Lawn Crematorium project (PN 19- 182) located at 1201 Forrest Street
Mayor Kerri Howell opened the public hearing.
Assistant Planner Josh Kinkade made a presentation and responded to questions from the City Council. Consultant Lisa Westwood from ECORP Consulting provided information regarding the cultural resources study and Community Development Director Pam Johns provided additional clarification.
The following speakers addressed the City Council:
1. Laura Allbaugh
2. Anita Claney
3. Wendy Schneider
4. Megan McClure
5. Terry Sorensen
6. Dave Hibbins
7. Nancy Oldham
DRAFT - Not ffidal until approued fui the Ciry Coancil Page 47 05/10/2022 Item No.6.
Book 76 Page234
Folsom City Council
April26,2022
8. Sean Gates
9. Joy Hays
10. Mary Johnson
11. Deborah Grassl
12. Peter Lucyga
13. Helen Walsh
14. Lorin Claney
15. Steve Walsh
16. Andrey Semenyuk
17. Victoria Foster
18. Jennifer Lane
19. June Chan
Hearing no more comments the public hearing was closed.
Motion by Gouncilmember YK Ghalamcherla, second by Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez to continue the item to the May 10, 2022 regular Gity Gouncil meeting.
AYES: Councilmember(s): Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski, Howell NOES: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSENT: Gouncilmember(s): None
ABSTAIN: Gouncilmember(s): None
CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
City Manager Elaine Andersen spoke of upcoming events: the Prescription Drug Takeback Day, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District open house, and the 9th Annual Community Service Day. She announced that the City is conducting a targeted multi-family and mixed-use housing study and is seeking public input.
GITY COUNGIL GOMMENTS:
Councilmember Sarah Aquino commented regarding the Wye property and proposed a future agenda item at an upcoming City Council meeting.
Councilmember Mike Kozlowski spoke of the recent SACOG meeting he attended.
Councilmember YK Chalamcherla thanked staff and the appellant for their work on the Lakeside Memorial Lawn crematorium appeal.
Vice Mayor Rosario Rodriguez commented regarding status of hiring an executive director for the Sacramento Transportation Authority, attending the upcoming Cap to Cap trip and upcoming concerts at the Zittel Farm Amphitheater.
Mayor Kerri Howell commented about traffic in Folsom and encouraged everyone to drive safely. She spoke of a recent issue for Regional Transit and announced an upcoming meeting for Sacramento-Placerville Rail JPA.
DR /lFT
- Not oficial until approued' fui the Ci4t Council Page 48 05/10/2022 Item No.6.
Book 76 Page 235
Folsom City Council
April26,2022
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom City Council, Mayor Kerri Howell adjourned the meeting at 9:16 Pm.
SUBMITTED BY:
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Kerri Howell, Mayor
DRAFT - Nat fficial antil approued fu the Ciry Council Page 49 05/10/2022 Item No.6.
This page is intentionally left blank.
05/10/2022 Item No.6.
J:i3: :,:
t .l,! i *i i r'.. r
,\ .fr,,j <t I 1,t-l ttit!!.llr:,
Folsom City Council
Staff rt
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10839 - A Resolution of the City Council Rati$ing the City Manager's Authorization for Emergency Replacement of the On-Site Fuel Tanks at the City of Folsom Corporation Yard, Determining the Project is Exempt from CEQA, and Appropriation of Funds.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The current Corporation Yard fuel tanks are over 30 years old and have exceeded their useful life. The diesel tank has a slow leak and is unrepairable. Emergency operations planning typically recommends keeping two weeks' worth of fuel in reserve; the diesel tank allows for less than 12 hours reserve, and the unleaded tank is approximately 75% undersized compared to current industry best practices.
POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code Section2,36.150, Emergency Procurement, provides that the City Manager shall make, or authorize others to make, emergency procurement of supplies, equipment, services, or construction items when there exists a threat to public health, welfare, or safety, provided that such emergency procurement shall be made with sufficient competition as is practicable under the circumstances.
I
MEETING DATE: 51r012022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10839 - A Resolution of the City Council Ratiffing the City Manager's Authorization for Emergency Replacement of the On-Site Fuel Tanks at the City of Folsom Corporation Yard, Determining the Project is Exempt from CEQA, and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Public Works Department
05/10/2022 Item No.7.
ANALYSIS
Current indusky best practices and emergency operations planning guidelines recommend keeping a minimum two week fuel reserve. Obtaining the best pricing on fuel requires purchasing a full truck and tanker load (roughly 9,000 gallons) of product. Tanks may only be filled to 80% of their rated capacity to allow for product expansion due to thermal changes.
These factors, combined with the City's average fuel usage over the last five years, result in recommended tank sizes of 18,000 gallons for unleaded gasoline and 23,000 gallons for diesel fuel. Depending on the pricing of prefabricated tanks, purchasing slightly larger capacity tanks may be more cost effective.
The City Corporation Yard's current fuel station consists of a 4,000 gallon unleaded gasoline tank and a 2,000 gallon diesel tank. Both tanks are repurposed, single-walled former underground storage tanks, mounted above ground, and co-located within a secondary containment structure along with a central tank product fill station and four product dispensing pumps.
Modern, purpose-built aboveground storage tanks are double-walled, with their required secondary containment built into the tank itself. Modern tanks typically do not require an additional secondary containment structure.
The current secondary containment structure and infrastructure can be reused with new equipment but will only accommodate one of the new tanks, most likely the unleaded gasoline tank. The new diesel tank will need to be installed at a different location within the Corporation Yard.
The City Manager authorized the emergency procurement for construction services under the existence of threat to public health, welfare, and safety, pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.1 50, Emergency Procurement.
While not required by the Municipal Code, this matter is being presented to the City Council for the Council's awareness and ratification. Staff is recommending that the City Council ratify the City Manager's authorization for the emergency work and appropriation of funds with a determination that the current condition of the tanks poses an immediate threat to the public's health, safety and welfare pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.150. Staff is recommending that this emergency procurement be used to select a contractor through a competitive bidding process.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The emergency procurement was not anticipated in the FY 2021-22 General Fund (Fund 010) Operating Budget, therefore staff is requesting an additional appropriation in the General Fund in an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000. The additional appropriation will come from the General Funds current fund balance, which is currently available for this procurement. 2
05/10/2022 Item No.7.
Given the immediate lower per-gallon cost of fuel that will be purchased less frequently but in greater quantities, the projected retum on investment is less than 10 years.
No significant revenue is anticipated from the sale of the existing equipment.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This emergency replacement project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section I5269(b) and (c), Emergency Projects.
ATTACIIMENT
Resolution No 10839 - A Resolution of the City Council Ratifying the City Manager's Authorization for Emergency Replacement of the On-Site Fuel Tanks at the City Corporation Yard, Determining the Project is Exempt from CEQA, and Appropriation of Funds Submitted,
Mark Rackovan, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
a
J
05/10/2022 Item No.7.
RESOLUTION NO. 10839
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL RATIFYING THE CITY MANAGER'S
AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT OF THE ON-SITE FUEL
TANKS AT THE CITY OF FOLSOM CORPORATION YARD, DETERMINING THE
PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA, AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS WHEREAS' the Corporation Yard fuel tanks are over 30 years old and have exceed their useful life; and
WHEREAS, the diesel fuel tank located at the Corporation Yard has an unrepairable slow leak; and
WHEREAS, both of the fuel storage tanks at the Corporation Yard are undersized compared to current industry best practices and emergency operations planning guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Manager made a determination for emergency procurement for construction services under the existence of threat to public health, welfare and safety, pursuant to Folsom Municipal Code Section 2.36.150, Emergency Procurement; and WHEREAS, staff will conduct a competitive bidding process prior to awarding the contract for this project; and
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the General Fund (Fund 010); and WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby ratif' the City Manager's emergency procurement of construction services for the emergency replacement of the Corporation Yard fuel tanks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate the amount bid by the successful contractor in the competitive bidding process, not to exceed $1,000,000 from the General Fund (Fund 010), from current available fund balance for the Corporation Yard fuel tank emergency replacement procurement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May 2022, by the following roll-call vote AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Council Member(s):
Council Member(s):
Council Member(s):
Council Member(s):
Resolution No. 10839
Page I of2 Page 54
05/10/2022 Item No.7.
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
05/10/2022 Item No.7.
This page is intentionally left blank.
05/10/2022 Item No.7.
' r:r: i :.
' ! , : - i t , rL -l :i.':-,",.}t
a,',,,tr{rirJ r: ;,"i ;:
Folsom Crty Council
Staff Re ort
RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council move to adopt:
Resolution No. 10840 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision.
BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision was approved by the City Council on February 13,2018.
The action for consideration by the City Council is the approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision. The Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Yillage No. 3 Subdivision will create atotal of 53 single-family high density (SFHD) residential lots. With the approval of the Final Map, the subdivision process for this project will be complete.
I
MEETING DATE: 511012022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10840 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2YilIageNo. 3 Subdivision
FROM: C ommunity Development Department
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
SEE RIGH' FOR VILLAGES 5 & 8
-i "t: *::---:i-l'
:.ti {r i rt l:1 *"-$-r
;- t
'>:i .,il ..i
I {.i :rlli'
.it
-.--Gr'. I itr
iwi .. -: j
€).*-.:-:
. 'i ,'i)i
.r.. -'--J)---,1'.
' !.i. lr'i
- j ird ti. riai
<'F-l-fi=-
tr
,4.\- -. -
,t
t''
The Mangini Ranch Phase 2YillageNo. 3 Subdivision is located on the north side of Savannah Parkway east of Westwood Drive and west of Placerville Road in the Folsom Plan Area (FPA) (see above).
POLICY / RULE
The Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the City's Subdivision Ordinance require that the City Council approve Final Maps and Subdivision Improvement Agreements.
ANALYSIS
The Final Map and conditions of approval for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Yillage No. 3 Subdivision have been reviewed by the Community Development Department and other City departments. The Final Map has been found to be in substantial compliance with the approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, and all conditions pertaining to the map have been satisfied.
Attached is a table which includes the conditions of approval for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map. The tables include information concerning whenthe condition is required to be satisfied (e.g. at Final Map, building permit, etc.), which City department is responsible to veriff that it has been satisfied, and comments or an explanation on how the condition was satisfied. This subdivision is consistent with the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) in regards to zoning and unit count. 2 ALDER CREEK PKWY
VILLAGE NO. 3
SAVANNAH PKWY
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
EIWIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On February 13, 2018, the City Council approved the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and determined that the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project is entirely consistent with the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) and Westland 'nugt"
Specific irlan Amendment and therefore exempt from review under the California Enirironmental Quality Act (CEQA) provided by Government Code section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15182.No additional environmental review is required' ATT
l. Resolution No. 10840 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accept Offers of Dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision, and Approval of the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision
Z. Mangini Ranch Phase 2YillageNo. 3 Subdivision Improvement Agreement
3. Mangini Ranch Phase 2YillageNo. 3 Subdivision Final Map
4. Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
5. Table of Conditions of Approval for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No' 3 Vesting Tentative Subdivision MaP
Submitted,
PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director
J
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 10840 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND ACCEPT OF'F'ERS OF'DEDICATION FOR THE
MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 VILLAGE NO. 3 SUBDIVISION, AND
APPROVAL OF'THE FINAL MAP F'OR THE MANGINI RANCH
PHASE 2VILLAGE NO. 3 SUBDIVISION
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
RESOLUTION NO. 10840
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND ACCEPT OFX'ERS OF' DEDICATION FOR THE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 VILLAGE NO. 3
SUBDIVISION, AND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP FOR THE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 VILLAGE NO.3 SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2Yillage No. 3 subdivision has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer as complying with the approved or conditionally approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2YillageNo. 3 subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the City Council agrees to accept, subject to improvement, any and all offers of dedication as shown on the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom that the Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2Yillage No. 3 subdivision is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Beazer Home Holdings, L.L.C. in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and accept the offers of dedication for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 subdivision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1Oth day of May 2022, by the following roll-call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10840
Page I ofl
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Councilmember(s)
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 VILLAGE NO.3 SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
No Fee Document Pursuant to Government
Gode Section 6103,
RECORDING REOUESTED BY
City of Folsom
WHEN RECORDED MAILTO:
NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
City of Folsom
City Clerk
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
CITY OF FOLSOM
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2022,by and between the City of Folsom, hereinafter referred to as "City", andBeazer Homes Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider".
RX,CITALS
A. Subdivider has presented to the City acertain Final Map of a proposed subdivision of land located within the corporate limits of the City that has been prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, the subdivision ordinances of the City, and the Tentative Subdivision Map, if any, of the subdivision previously approved by the City Council of the City.
B. The proposed subdivision of land is commonly known and described as Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village. No. 3, and is herein referred to as the "subdivision".
C. Subdivider has requested approval of the Final Map prior to the construction and completion of the public improvements (as shown on the approved improvement plans and listed in Exhibit A), including, but not limited to streets, highways, public ways, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, bikeways, storm drainage facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, domestic water facilities, public utility facilities, landscaping, public lighting facilities, park or recreational improvements and appurtenances thereto, in or required by the Subdivision Map Act, the subdivision ordinances of the City, the Tentative Subdivision Map and development agreement, if any, approved by the City. The foregoing improvements, more specifically listed on Exhibit A attached hereto, are hereinafter referred to as "the required improvements". 1
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
D City Council has required as a condition precedent to the approval of the Final Map, the Subdivider first enters into and executes this subdivision improvement agreement with the City NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
l. Performance of Work. Subdivider agrees to furnish, construct, and install at his own expense the required improvements as shown on the approved plans and specifications of the subdivision, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department, and is incorporated herein by reference, along with any changes or modifications as may be required by the City Engineer due to errors, omissions, changes in conditions, or changes in facilities as required by the City Engineer' The approved plans and specifications of the required improvements may be modified by the Subdividei as the development progresses, provided that any modification is approved in writing by the City Engineer. The total estimated cost of the required improvements, AS ShOWN ON EXhibit A, iS ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO AND OO/1OO DOLLARS
($1,556,132.00).
Z. Work: Satisfaction of Citv Engineer. All of the work on the required improvements is to be done at the places, of the materials, and in the manner and at the grades, all as shown upon the approved plans and specifications and as required by the City's Improvement Standards and Standard Construction Specifications and any applicable City ordinances or state and federal laws, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
3. Work: Time for Commencement and Performance. Work on the required i-p.ou"-.nts shall be completed by the Subdivider on or before twelve (12) months from the date of this Agreement. At least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the commencement of such work, the Subdivider shall notiff the City Engineer in writing of the date fixed by Subdivider for commencement of the work. 4 Time of Essence:
5 a. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The date for completion of the work of construction may not be extended, except as provided in Section 16'36.110 of the Folsom MuniciPal Code'
Improvement Security. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Subdivider shall furnish the CitY:
Improvement security in the sum of ONE MILLION F'M HUNDRED FIFTY-SX TIIOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO AND OO/1OO
DOLLARS ($1,556,132.00), which sum is equal to one hundred percent of the total estimated cost of constructing the required improvements and the cost of any other obligation to be performed by Subdivider under this Agreement, conditioned upon the faithful performance of this Agreement; and a.
2
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
b Separate improvement security in the sum of ONE MILLION FM
HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO
AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,556,132.00), which sum is equal to one hundred percent of the estimated cost of constructing the required improvements, securing payment to the contractor, subcontractor and to persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment to them for the construction of the required improvements.
c. The Subdivider shall deposit with the City THRI'E THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($3,000.00) for the Final Map. The deposit may be used at the discretion of the City to correct deficiencies and conditions caused by the Subdivider, contractor, or subcontractors that may arise during or after the construction of the subdivision.
d. The estimated total cost of required improvements includes a ten percent (10%) construction cost contingency, the cost of the installation of survey monuments in the Subdivision to guarantee and secure the placement of such monuments as provided by Section 66496 of the Government Code of the State of California, and an estimated utility cost in addition to ensure installation of public utilities.
In lieu of providing the estimate of total utility costs, the Subdivider may submit, in a form acceptable to the City Engineer, certification from the utility companies that adequate security has been deposited to ensure installation.
Plan Checking and Inspection Fees. The Subdivider shall pay to the City fees for the checking, filing, and processing of improvement plans and specifications, and for inspecting the construction of the required improvements in the amounts and at the times established by the City.
Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Subdivider shall indemnify, protect, defend, save and hold the City harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for death or injury to persons, or damage to property resulting from intentional or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of Subdivider or Subdivider's officers, employees, volunteers, and agents during performance of this Agreement, or in connection with Subdivider's work, or from any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the willful misconduct, negligent acts, or omissions of Subdivider or its employees, subcontractors, or agents, or by the quality or character of Subdivider's work. It is understood that the duty of Subdivider to indemnifu and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Subdivider from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply, and shall further survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. By execution of this Agreement, Subdivider acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration.
Subdivider shall, at his own cost and expense, defend any and all actions, suits, or legal proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City, its officers and employees, on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfu any judgement that may be a
J
6 7
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
8 rendered against the City in any such actions, suits or legal proceedings, or result thereof.
Insurance. Subdivider and any contractors hired by Subdivider to perform any of the Required Improvements shall, at their expense, maintain in effect for the duration of this Agreement or until the required improvements are accepted by the City, whichever first occurs, not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Subdivider and it contractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Agreement. The failure of Subdivider or any of its contractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Agreement. a. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Subdivider shall maintain limits not less than I
-t
2. Comprehensive General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occuffence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of Califomia and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. b
c.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages A. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Subdivider; products and completed operations of the Subdivider; premises ownedo leased or used by the Subdivider; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Subdivider. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
The Subdivider's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance 4 B
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance of self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Subdivider's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
D The Subdivider's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
2 Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights or subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Subdivider for the City.
All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided or cancelled by either parly, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirfy (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of not less than A: VIL
Verification of Coveraee. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Subdivider shall furnish the City with original endorsements affecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
Title to Improvements. Title to and ownership of the required public improvements constructed under this Agreement by Subdivider shall vest absolutely in the City upon completion and written acceptance of such improvements by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall not accept the required improvements unless Subdivider certifies that such improvements have been constructed in conformity with the approved plans and specifications, approved modifications, if any, the approved Final Map, City Improvement Standards and Standard Construction Specifications, any applicable City Ordinances or State and Federal laws and after 35 days from the date of filing of a Notice of Completion.
Warrantv Security. Prior to acceptance of the required improvements by the City Engineer, the Subdivider shall provide security in the amount and in the form as required by the City Engineer to guarantee the improvements against any defective work or labor done or defective materials used in the performance of the required improvements (Warranty Security) throughout the warranty security period which shall be the period of one year following 5 C.
J
d.
e.
9 10.
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
11. completion and written acceptance of the improvements (Warranty Security Period). The amount of the Warranty Security shall not be less than l0 percent of the cost of the construction of the improvements, including the cash deposit required in paragraph 5C of this agreement, which shall be retained for the Warranty Security Period.
Repair or Reconstruction of Defective Work or Materials. If, within the Warranty Security peiiod or the applicable statute of limitations, whichever is longer, any improvement or part of any improvement furnished and/or installed or constructed by Subdivider or any of the work done under this Agreement fails to fulfill any of the requirements of the Agreement or the specifications referred to herein as determined by the City, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to the City, repair, replace, or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory partor parts of the required improvements. If the Subdivider fails to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, or if the exigencies of the situation require iepairs or replacements to be made before the Subdivider can be notified, then the City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work, and Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs plus fifteen percent (15%) within thirfy (30) days of the date of billing for such work by City. The parties further understand and agree that the Warranty Security furnished pursuant to paragraph 10 of this Agreement shall guarantee and secure the faithful performance and payment of the provisions of this paragraph during the Warranty Security Period.
12. Subdivider N Asent of Citv. Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider's agents or
13. contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider's obligations under this Agreement.
Notice of Breach and Default. If Subdivider refuses or fails to prosecute the work, or any part thereof, with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time specified, or any extension thereof, or fails to complete the work within such time, or if Subdivider should be adjudged a bankruptcy, or Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of his "."dito.r,
or if a receiver should be appointed in the event of Subdivider's insolvency, or if Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees should violate any of the provisions of this Agreement and the City may, but is under no obligation to, serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider's surety, if any, of breach of this Agreement, or of any portion thereof.
Breach of Asreement: Performance By Suretv or City. In the event of any such notice, Subdivider's surety, if any, shall have the duty to take over and complete the work and the required improvements; provided, however, that if the surety within fifteen (15) days after the seiving of such notice of breach upon it does not give the City written notice of its intention to take over the performance thereof within fifteen (15) days after notice to the City of such election, then the City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract, or by any other method the City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of the Subdivider, and the Subdivider's surety shall be liable to City for any excess coits of damages incurred by the City; and in such event, the City, without liability for so doing, may take possession of and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant or other property belonging to Subdivider as may be on the site of the work and necessary therefor.
14. 6
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
15. If the form of improvement security is other than a bond, then the City, after giving notice of breach of the Agreement, may proceed to collect against the improvement security in the manner provided by law and by the terms of the security instrument.
Notices. All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing, and delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid.
Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:
City of Folsom
Community Development Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsomo CA 95630
ATTN: City Engineer
Notices required to be given to Subdivider shall be addressed as follows:
Beazer Homes Holdings' L.L.C.
12317 Edyth Lake Way
Rancho Cordova, CA 957 42
ATTN; Lucas C. Wissmanno President & Taylor R. Bollinger, VP Notices required to be given surety, if any, of Subdivider shall be addressed as follows:
Any party of the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.
16. Attorney's Fees. In the event any legal action is brought to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled.
17. Assienment. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the assigns, successors in interest, heirs, executors, and administrators of the parties, and the parties agree that the City may cause a copy of this Agreement to be recorded in the Sacramento County Recorder's Office.
7
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as follows:
SUBDIVIDER
Beazer Home Holdings, L.L.C.,
A Delaware Limited Liability Company
BY
Print Name: Print Name:
Title: Title
DATE
CITY OF FOLSOM' a Municipal Corporation
DATE
Elaine Andersen
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
DATE
Christa Freemantle
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
DATE
Pam Johns
COMMLINITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM
DATE
Steven Wang
CITY ATTORNEY
BY
DA
NOTICE: SIGNATURE(S) ON BEHALF OF ..SUBDIVIDER,,MUST BE NOTARIZED Certificate of Acknowledgement pursuant to Civil Code, Section 1189, must be attached.
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT-Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No.3 8
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
BOND #
PREMIUM
PERFORMANCE BOND
for
Subdivision Improvement Agreement
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Folsom, a Municipal Corporation in the State of California, and Beazer Home Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement where by principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 2022, and identified as the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No. 3 Subdivision f*p.o*-ent Agreement is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, Said Principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, We, the PrinciPal, and
as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Folsom, hereinafter referred to as the City; in the Penal sum of ONE MILLION FM HUNDRED FIF'TY-SIX TI{OUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO AND 00i100 DOLLARS ($1,556,132.00), lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourr.iu"r, our heirs, successors, executors, and administrators, jointly and severally firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condiiions, and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof madl as therein provided, on its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and inall respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnifl and save harmless the City, its oificers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successful enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice^of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the sPecifications.
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above namedo on ,2022.
(PRINCIPAL)
(PRINCIPAL)
(suRETY)
(ADDRESS)
(CITY, STATE, ZIP)
(TELEPHONE)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
BY
BY
BY
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
BOND #
LABOR & MATERIALS BOND
for
Subdivision Improvement Agreement
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Folsom, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Beazer Home Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company (hereinafter designated as "Principal"), have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 2022, andidentified as the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Village No.3 Subdivision Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and made apart hereof; and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Folsom to secure ihe claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; NOW THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Folso* und all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code bf ciuit procedure, in the sum of oNE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX THOUSAND oNE HUNDRED THTRTY-TWO AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,556,132.00) for materials turnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in caie suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, cost and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court' and to be taxed ui rorir and to be included in the judgment therein rendered' It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit ofany and all persona, companies and corpbrations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Seciion 30s2) of pu.t 4 of Diviiion 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of iaid agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition.
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on ,2022.
(PRINCIPAL)
GRTNCIPAL)
(suRETY)
(ADDRESS)
(CITY, STATE, ZIP)
(TELEPHONE)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
BY
BY
BY
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 VILLAGE NO. 3
F'INAL MAP
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
l [('r^----
115 /
oF,, '"tFOLSOM
S
O\ANER'S STATEMENT CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
THE UNDERSIGNED DOES H€REBY STATE THATWE ARE THE ONLY PARTIES ilVING AW RECORD TITLEINTEREST IN THE RSL PROPERfr INCTUOED WIfrIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS FINAL MAP OF'MANGINI RANCts PHASE 2 - ULUGE 3' AND DO HEREBY DECLARE ffE CONSENT FROM NO OTHERPERSON IS NECESSARY, AND WE CONSENT TO THE PR€PAMTION AND RECORDANON OF THIS FINALMP. AND OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND M HEREBY DEDI$TE AS PUELIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASPUBLIC UTIUfl SEMENTS IO THE Cfi OF FOLSOM, SAVANNAH PARruAY, BMERROOT WAY,DANDAIS WAY, PERSIMMON WAY AND SNAPDMGON WAY AS SHOWN HEREON.
IHEREBY STATE frAT IHAVE *MINED THIS FIML MAP tr'MANGINIMNCH PHASE 2.VILUGE 3^ ANDFIND IT TO BE SUSSTANTIALLY IHE SAME AS THE TENTATryE MAP APPRO@ BY THE CIry COUNCIL OFffE CIW OF FOLSOM, AND ruTALLPROVISIONS OFBE SUBDVISION MAP AqANDALLAPPUilBLE Cfr OROINANCES MVE BEEN COMPLIEO WM.
WE DO HEREBY OEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES ftE FOLLOWNG:
1. A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALUTION AND MAINTENANCE OF OMIN, GAS, SilER AND WATER PIPES AND FOR UNDERGROUNO WIRES AND CONDUtrS FOR ELECIRICAL, ELryISrcNAND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, TOGETHER WtrH AW AND ALLAPPURTENANCES PERTAININGfrERflO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOTS A, B, C, D, AND E AND THOSE STRIPS OF UNOSHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED ?UBLrc UNLW qSEMENT' (P.U,E.),
2. A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR PEOESTRIAN ACCESS ON. OVER ANO ACROSSTHOSE STRIPS OFSNO SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGMTED'PEDESNhN ACCESS EAStrENT (P,A.E.).
STWEN R. KMHN, RCE49291CIfl ENGINEERctryoFFosM
3. A PUBLIC EASEMENT AND RIGHT{F-WAY FOR TNE INSTALUNON, REPAIR, RilOVAL OR REPUCilENT OF UNDSAPING TOGETHER WTH ANY AND ALL APPURENANCES PERTAINING]HERETO ON, OVER, UNDER, ACROSS ANO AEOVE THOSE STRIPS OF SNDS SHOWN HEREONAND DESIGNATED "UNOSMPE ASEMENI' (1.E.).
4. A PUBLIC ASEMENT FOR CONSNUCTION AND MIMANING CENTRALIZED MIL DELVERY BOXES. PEOESTALS AND SSBS, TOGETHER WtrH ANY AND AIL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING ffERflO INCLUDINGPEDESTRIANACCESS FOR DELVERY AND RECEIMOF MAIL ON, OVER, ANDACROSS STRIPS OF SND FME (5) FEET IN WOTH CONTIGUOUS IO ALL RIGHT{F{AYS,
CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I HEREAY STATE TMT I MVE MMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF'MNGINIMNCH PHASE 2. VILUGE 3'ANDI AM SAtrSFIED THAT $ID MAP IS ECHNISLLY CORRECT.
VICINITY MAP GERALDA, YOUNG, I.S, 3852
NTS CIry SURVEYOR
LICENSE EXPIRES: 6/3U2022
5. AN ASEMENI FOR INGRESS ANO EGRESS FOR SUPPORT AND USE BY SW ENFORCEMEM, FIRE PROIECTION, WELFAREANO OTHER PUBLICAGENCIES, THEIRVEHICIES AND PERSONNEL OVERLOT C SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATEOIMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ilSEMENT'{E,VA.). NAVD88 BENCHMARK{ITY OF FOLSOM ESCHMRK?2" EIryATPN = 502.07 NAVO88
BMSS DISK STAMPED 'CIil OF FOLSOM BM 72 ON THE WEST CORNER OF A CONCRETE DMINAGESTRUCTURE. LOCAflON OF SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET SOUTN OF ALDER CREEK PARKWAY AND80 FEET EASTOFTESPTCJPA RAILROADTMCKS.APPROXIMATEUTroDE:N38D3A 13-33 LONGTUDE;W12lD6'0E.22"HE BASIS FOR ELWATIONS WERE RUN FROM COUNft SENCHMRX UOlMOg STAMPED'K€56'IN FEBRUARY2Ol4 BY MAC&YAND SOMPS CVIL ENGINEERS, INC,
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
I tsEREBY STATETilTfrE CIry COUNCIL OFNE CNOF FOLSOM HASAPPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF "MANGINI MNCH PHASE 2-VILUGE 3' AND HAS ACCEPTED, ON BEilLF OFTHE PUBUC, SU&ECT TO IMPROVEMENTS, ALL RIGHT4F.WAYS AND ASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDIilNON N ACCORDANCE WITH THE ERMS OF ruT OFFER AND hAS APPRryED THE ASNDONMENI OF THESSEMENTS LISTED HEREON.
BEAZER HOI\4ES HOLDINGS, LLC,
A DELAWARE LllillTED LIABILITY coMPANY
ChRISTA FREEMNTLECIryCLERKOATE:
BY: BY:
NAME: TAYLOR R, BOLLINGER Preliminary TITLEI W DIV U & FoRWARD PHNNING , NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
MME: LUCAS C. WSSMNN
TITLE: PRESIDENT 0MSIONAL
. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 0411312022 7:31:02 AM RECORDER'S STATEMENT
NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
F|LED Bts '..'....'........._ DAy oF _,m22, AT_.M. tN BooK _oF MPs, AT PAGE -
ATBE REQUEST OF MCMY & SMPS qVIL ENGINEERS. INC. TITLE TO THE SNO INCLIOED IN ftIS FINAL MAP BEINGWSEDAS PER CERNFIATE NO,-ON FITE IN THISOFFICE.
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTH€R OFFICER COMPLENNG THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONIY THE IDEMI OF THE INDVIDUAL WHO SIGNED frE OOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERNFISE IS ANACHED AND NOT BE NUTHFULNESS ACCURACY OR VAIIDIW OF THAT D@UMENT, THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELO SURVEY INCONFORMANCE Wft THE REOUIREMENTS OF THE SUBOVISION MP ACTAND LOCAL ORDIMNCE ATTHE REOUEST OF FOISOM RffL ESTATE SOUTH, LLC, A DEUWARE LIMNED LIABILIfr COMPAW ANDSRPENTER EAsr, LLc, A DESWARE LtMtrED uABttry CoMPANY tN MAY 2018. I HEREBV STATE THATTHIS FIML MAP SUASTANThLLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIOMLLY APPROVEO TEMATIVE MAP|THATTHE MONUMENTSWILL 8E OFTHECHARACTER ANDWU MCUPYTHE POSITIONS AS INDICATEDANDwIlL BESETBY DECEMBER 31,2023i ANDTMT SAID MONUMENTSWITL BE SUFFICIENTTOENABLETHE SURWY TO BE RETMCED. 66rMil DocuMENrNo:-
SACMMENTO COUNfr RECORDERSTATEOF qLIFORNIA
STAE OF CALIFORNIACOUNryOF
BY:_
DEPUil
FEE: S
ON- BEFORE ME,-. A NOTARY PUBLIC
'ERSONALLY APPSqED
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF $NSFAfrORY WIDENCE TO BE TNE PERSON(S) WHOSEMMEiS) IgARE SUESCRISED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THATHE/SHEtrHEY ilECWED frE SAME IN HISHEMHEIR AWHORIZED qPACIil(IES), AND TilT BYHIgHEMHEIR SIGNAruRE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENTTHE PERSON(S), OR THE ENNry UPON BEHALF OFWHICH THE PERSON(S)ACED, AECTEDTHE INSNUMENII CERNry UNDER PEMLW OF PERJUfr UNOER GE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THATIHEFOREGOING PAMGRAPH IS TRUEAND CORRECT,WITNE$ MY HANDAND OFFICIALSilL SIGNATURE PRINTED NAMEMY PRINCIPAL PSCE OF EUSINESS IS COUNry
MY COMMTSSTON EXPTRES
-VY
COMMISSION NLMBER
MACUY &SOMPS CIVIL ENGIN€ERS, INC. FTNAL MAP (PN 17-307.03)
MANGINI RANCH
PHASE 2 -VILLAGE 3 PAUL FERGUSON, JR.
DATE:
BEING A MERGER AND RESUBDVISION OF LOT 3 AND LOT 3A OF THAT CERTAINFINAL MAP TITLED'MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 URGE LOT' FIIED FOR RECORO ON JUIY 2, 201 9. IN BOOK 412 OF MPS AT PAGE 7 SACRAMENTO COUNry RECORDS.
BEING A PORNON OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, MNGE 8 AST, M.O.B.M, CITY OF FOLSOM. SACRAMENTO COUNry. CALIFORNIA
APRIL 2022
SHEET 1 OF 6 MACIGY&SOMPS 4GNE6 PWtr& gffi
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT
PSCER TIIE COMPAW, A CALIFORNIA CORPORANON, AS TRUSTEE UNDER IHAT CERTAIN DEED OFNUSI ASSIGNMENT OF LENES AND RENTS, SECURfrAGREEMEMAND FIXIURE FILING, RECOROEO NOWMBER 10, 2021, 0N5TRUMEffi) 20211110@39, OFFICh! RECORDS OF SACMMENTO COUNW,HEREBY @NSENTSTO THE RECOROANON OF ilIS MPANDTHE SUBDMSION OFTHE UNDS SHOWNHEREONDAE SIATE OF ilLIFORNIAcouNry oF_
BEFORE NOTARY ruBLrc
ALL CURVE DIMENSIONS ARE MDUS, DATA AND ARC LENGN. AIL DISIANCES SHOWN AREGROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS fHEREOF. DUE TO ROUNDING THE SUMOF INOIVIDUALDIMENSIONSMY NOT EOUALTHEOVER&LDIMENSION,
2. THIS FINAL MAP CONTAINS 11.10& ACRES GROSS CONSISTING OF 53 RESIDEML LOTS AND 5 LffERED LO-S.
3. A PRELIMIMRY GEOECHNIqT ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THE MANGINI MNCH (PROJECT NOEO?145.001I WAS PREPARED BY YOUNGDAHL CONSULTING GROUP, INC ON JULY,2014 IS AVAIUAE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT NE CIfr OF F4SOM COMMUNN DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENL 4, ALL ROM LOT CORNERS WILL BE SET WFH A 1" DIAMftR BMSS DISC STAMPED 'LS 926Y ON A 1 .OO F@T OFFSfl ONTO THE SIDSALK ON THE SIDE PROPERfl LINE EXTSDED (SEE DETAILHISSHEET). 5, RSR LO] CORNECSWILL EESETAS FOLLWS (UNLESSSHWN O'HERWISE) 5.1. FOR THE COMMON LINES OF LOTS 1749,4849 4tr8/!9, d51 ANo 51/52 WIU BE Sfl Wfr A C& RESR AND PSSNC CAP STAMPED 'LS 926fl.
5.2. FORTHECfiMON LINESOF LOTS 1&19.AND 3gSOWILLBE SETWMA4.M FMTOFSETON THE SIOE LOI LINE WtrH A il' REBAR AND PUSTE qP STAMPED'LS 9265' (sEE DflAIL THISSHEET). 5.3. FOR LOTS t16,20-37,3g5AND THE COMMS IINES OF4d47AND46/48 WHICH FALLWffiINA MASONRY WALL WII BE SET WTH A A4 BRS TAG STAUPED AS 92S' ON THE FACE OFWA[ 2 M FOOTABWE GROUND OR M TOP OF THEWALL,
6. PROPERfr SUBJECT TO COMMUMry FACILITIES DISTRICT 2013I (WATER FACIUTIES AND SUPPLYI IN ACCORDANCE WtrH THE ilELLO ROOS COMMUNN FACILITIES ICT OF !982" $IDASESSIiEMSARSOR WILL BE COUECED WIff THE ANNUAL TM BILL PER 20131230 O.R. 81 I 7, PROPERW SUEJECT TO COMMUNIil FACILITIES DISIRICT NO. 17 (WLLOW HILL PIPELINE) PER 20150325 0.R.0353.
E. PROPERry SUEJECTTO THE SCtsOOL FACILtrIES IMPRMMENT OISNICT NO,3, AS DISCIOSED 8Y THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MAP, RECORDED JULY 07, 2ffi, AS BOOK 103' PAGE 9 PER2ffi0707 0.R.0&2. 9, PROPERil SUBJEf TO THE CIry OF FOLSOM COMMUNIry FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014I {NPOWEF PACE PROGMM), AS DISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAI! ASSESSMENI MP, RECORDEDDECEMBER 23,20r3,AS B@K 1'6, PAGE 7 PER 20131223 0.F.036. 10, PROPERfr SUBJECT TO THE SLIFORNA HOME FINANCE AUTHORIry COMMUNTES FACILtrIES olsntcT No. 201+1 (cLilN ENERGY), AS OISCLOSED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT MP RECOFDED @TOBER 05,2015, AS (BOOK) 20151005, (PAGE) 0753.
11. PROPERN SUBJEfr TO COMMUNIil FACILNES DISTRICT NO, 18 (FOLSOM ruN ARS . AREA wtDE TMPROVEMENre AND SERVICES) PER 20151209 O.R.0427 ANO 20181116 O.R.465.
12. PROPERry SUBJECT TO COMMUNIry FACILtrIES DISNrcT NO, 23 (FOLrcM MNCH) PER BOOK 130 OF ASSESSM€NT MPS AT PAGE 27 ANO ON 20rc060816$.
13- PROPERry SUBJECT TO VAER SUPPLY ANO FACIMES FINANCING lAN AND AGREEMENT PER 4130124 O.R. 132 AND DOCUMENTS DECURING MODIFCANONS THEREOF PER MlS326o.R. 1 51 I, 11 30521 0.R, 0S1 , 201 4m03 0.R, 0959.
14. PROPEW SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVER $ID ND FOR AVIGANON AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES N GMffiED TO THE OF COUW OF SACRAMENTO AND CIfr OF FOTSOM PER20140715 0.R. 518AND523.PROPERry SUBJECT TO BE ERMS, CONDMONS AND PROVISIONS AS COMAINED IN frEAGREEMENT EMITLED "FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DMOPMENT AGREEMENT,REUTIVETO THE FOLSN SOUTH SPECIFIC UN' BYANO BEMEENNECIryOF FOLW,ANDCARPilER AST, [C, RECORDEO JULY 15, T14, AS BOOK 20140715, PAGE 522, OtrICIALRECORDS, AND AS AMENDED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED. JANUARY 29,2016 AS B@K 20160129'PAGE O3S. OFFICIAL RECOROS. AND AS AMENDEO BY @UMENT RECOROED, SEPTEMBER 17, 2019, DN 20190917190, O.R, AND MODIFED BY DSUMEM RECORDED, NOVEMBER 10.2021' ON202111r00&0. ,/
l------------'r' i t= | **"o.-1 E I rP I 12-5 P.u.E. Y I lk -l ttMONUMENT 1' Dh. BM$ DISK(WP) F ml) PAVEMENT
LOT CORNER
TYPICAL 1'OFFSET
PERSONALLY APPSRED - wHo pRovED ro ME oN nE eess or srrsrecronlEi6Ei6Ei6EFfrEFEFS6friGi-frFGEiiilEi$ IS/ARE SUBSCRIEED TO NE WtrHIN INSTRUMEM AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME ffAT HASHffifl EXECfrED THE SAME IN HIS/HERMEF ASHORIZED ilPACIfr(IES), AND IHAT BY HIS/HERtrHEIR gGNAruRE(S) ON ME NSTRUMEM THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTIfl UPON SEHALF OF MICH THE PERSON(S) ACIED. EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERNfl UNDER PEMLfl OF PERJURY INDER THE UWS OF ffE STATE OF CAIFORNIATHAT THE FOREGOING PAilGRAPH IS NUE AND CORRECI WN€SS W HANO AND OFFICiA! SSL NOTFS
15-
16. PROPERW SUBJECT TO THE ERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVSIONS AS CONTAINED IN TNE MUMENT ENTtrLED "BUILDERS AGREEMENI" BY AND BWEEN EAST MRPENTERIMPROVEMENT COMPANY, TLC, AND BffiR HOMES HOLDINGS, LLC, A DEUWARE LIMIEDLhBIUT COMPANY, RECORDED NOVEMAER 10, ?021, AS (INSRUMENT) 2021111M91, OFICIALRECORDS. 17, LOTS A, A, C D, AND E AS SHOWN PER IHIS MAP ARE TO BE DEEOED TO BE CIfl OF FOLSOM EITHEF CONCURRENT OR FOLLNING RECORDATION OFNIS MAP.
16. PROPERfl IS SUBJECT TO THE'FUEL MODIFICATION PUN, FOLSOM RANCN PilSE 2, AST CARPEWR IMPROVEMENTCOMPAW'PREPARED BYWOOD RODGERSAND ON FILE IN THE CryOF FOLSOM COMMUMW DryELOPMENT DEPARTMEM, 19, PROPERry (ES WffIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PENDING SCH@L FACILtrIES IMPROVEMENT DSmrcT NO. Z
20. PROPERry SUBJECTTO N %GREEMENT AFFEflNG RilL PROPERry (NCIUSIONARY HOUSING AGREEMENT)' PER 20191217 O.R. 0909.
21. PURSUANT TO SECTION tr49(G) OF NE SUBOIVISION ACT THE FILING OF THIS FINAL MP SHALT CONStrUTE ABANDONMENT OF THE ENEM&TS LISTED BELOW, NOT SHOM HERFON,WTHIN THE BOUNOARY OF THIS MP.A, THE SNDSSE ASEMENT, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SSEMEM AND PUBLrc UNLfi BSEMENTWtrNIN LOT 3 OF 412 8.M.7.
B. PSCERVIIE ROAD RIGfr.OF.WAY PER ru O.R. 1S C. SAVANMH PARKWAY RIGHT4F-WAY DEDICATED PER 412 8.M.7 (REDEDICATED ON THIS
RARLOTLINE
REUR/MP
96 REAR LOT CORNER
WPICAL4'OFFSET
F|NAL MAP (PN 17-307.03)
MANGINI RANCH
PHASE2-VILLAGE3
BEING A MERGER ANO RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 AND LOT 34 OF TUT CERTAINFIML MAP TITLED'MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 URGE LOT', FILED FOR RECORD ON JULY 2,2019, IN BOOK 412OF MPSAT PAGE7, SACRAMENTO COUNry RECORDS' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 1 6 TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH. MNGE 8 EAST, M.D.B,M.
CITY OF FOLSOM. SACRAI\iIENTO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
mAGI(lY&$0mPS APR|L 2022 ExdEm PWm 8'ffim cAstr ps)*ile SHEET 2 OF 6
SIGMTURE PRINTEONAME
MY PRINCIPA! PUCE OF BUSINESS IS COUNryW COMMISSION EXPIRES:- W COMMISSION NUMBER: - SEE THIS SHEET FOR NOTES AND SEE SHEET 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
30 27
31 41
40 24
33 39
23 34
38 22
37 36
10 18
13 11 16 f5 14
SNAPDRAGON WAY {.3)
3 (:)
I
I
ltg
An3'21'36' NANDELION
i3) SNAPDRAGON WAY
LEGEND BASIS OF BEARINGS
o,q
@
@
CENTER ONE{UARTER CORNER AS NOED5/8'REBARWfr PUSICAPSAMPED'LS5760"TOBESETPER(1)SflSTANDARD C!fl OF FOLSOM MONUMENTWELL STAMPED ^LS 926f,Sfl V4' IRON PIPE WITF PUSTIC PLUG STAMPED ^LS 9265" SF 1' DIAMftR BRA$ OISK STAMPED AS 9265' ON A 1 FOOT OFFSf,OMO THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF frE ROADSET 3/4' BRASS TAG STAMPED "LS 9265'Sff V8' REBAR WITH PUSNC *P STAMPED 'LS 9265'
DIMENSION POINTRECORD DATA PER REFERENCEEOOK OF MPSCENTER LINE DECURANON OF COVEMNTS ANO RESTRrcNONSMUMENT NUMBER. O,R.EMERGENCY VEHICLEACCE$ ASEMENTIRREVOSBE OFFER OF DEOICATION
UNDSCAPE EASEMENT
OVERALLOFFICIAL RECOROS OF SACRAMEMO COUW
PROPERflLINEPEDESRIAN ACCESS ASEMENT
THE BASIS OF BilRING FOR THIS SUruEY E THE NORTHASERLY LINE OFLOT S AS SHOWN ON THE UNGINI MNCH PHASE 2 URGE LOT UP ELEDFOR RECORO ON JULY 2,2019 IN BOOK 412 OF UPS, AT PAOE 7,SACMMENTO COUW RECORDSAND ilVINGA BEARING OFSOUTH 3g'$5fl4ST AS OEERMINED FROM NE MONUMENTS SHOS AS FOUND.
APPROXIMATE LOCANON
REFERENCES
q
o
o
B.M.
qL
D.C.R.
DN
t-o.0.
L,E.
(oA)
o.R.
P,A.E.P.U.E.
(R)
SF
.A
'ee"% 11) 4128.M.7
OF PROPOSEOBIKEBIL RUSSEL RANCH
LARGE LOT
398 B.M. 1
LOT 7
II
1 I
,"/
I
{
I
I
(+ )
I
I
)
MOIAL BEARING
RIGHT{f-WAY
SOUARE FEF
LOCATIONBIKE
S.M.U,D. SACSMENTO MUNICIPAL UTIN DFTRICT
S.P.T.C,J,P,A. SACRAMEffiOruCERVILLETRANSPORTATION
CORRIDOR JOINT PWERS AfrHORIfl
l-i' sHEET INDEX NUMBER
MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2-..-'- II Q'o^Y,,
Z"Q*'" \ ,o"t*"o u ounn
\t J \,
VILLACE 4
422 B.M. 1
BOUNDARYLOT LINE & RIGHT4F-WAYLOT LINE
ADJACENT PROPERil
SSEMENTCENTER LINE
A=fl"4S'
+
n4:.oo
/ 4-63"5313"
."*t ) v6 440'26'2' L=35.8/o o 40 a0 160
---l SCALE: 1"-a0'
t_
l
SMUD SITE
20170608 0.R.
1270 &.1271
FTNAL MAP (PN 17-307.03)
MANGINI RANCH
PHASE 2 -VILLAGE 3
EEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 AND LOT S OF NAT CERTAINFIML MAP TITLEO'MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 URGE LOT" FILED FOR RECORD ON JULY 2,2019, IN BOOK 412 OF MPS AT PAGE 7, SACRAMENTO COUNN RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF SECION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST. M.D.B.M, CITY OF FOLSOM. SACRAMENTO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
!B &.24'(1)
15LE/PAE J
A(/ )
] LOT 20(1)i
1/4 SEC. 16. Z'IUMINUM CAP ON 5/8" RESR SAMPED
LS.€33 PER21E P.M, 17 DESTROYED BY CONSTRUCTLON TO BERESETWff MONUMENTWELL PERCOUNI STANDARDS APRIL 2022 SHEET 3 OF 6 SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES AND SEE THIS SHEET FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 LARGE LOT
412 B.M. 7
LOT 13
I.O.D, CITY OF FOLSOM
202104A2 0.R.4622
P.U.E(1)
mAGIAY&s0mPS aGNeRE UtS $ffi@
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
ail'3213' I
10 4,074SF
M3.57'g'E
I
I
_ _ I'j "_'i I
18 5,683SF
b 19
; 6,8ssF
L=11Sq
11 4,125SF
55.00 12
4,125 SF 15
4,125SF
-f----
16 6,967SF
N88'57'34E 414.75 L-oI4- pu.ere.e.ere.
N
tI -t
!$
.aGt
SNAPDRAGON
--."-
16 1S.92'
1 s5_92' -JI
III
J
-r-N 2'
=
I
I
lI
I
I
NS"57'g'E 929.s1OA) Line Table
Leigth
6.@'
6.m'4.@
&adng
N01'0226U(R)
NS's7's'EE)N88.57e.E(R)
LIL2B
APPROXIMTE L@ANONOF PROPOSED BIKETRAIL 37
I
II
II
I
I
DETAIL "A"
NTS
20 Curue Table
Lryt
27.39'
&b
c1 20.m' 78'27'47'
SEE DETAIL "A"ON THIS
L47.%\1) /
22'
12.5 N88'57y'E
loFlJlLrJ Io
tllLUa
F mr'ozmw
l--v.at r3.04
NS.t'g'E 929.910A) R=20.0d
SNAPDMGON WAY A=90'00!0' 12.5'
2g
I
im'
I
3l-l
2A' 20 rV
Jill'_
+
-T--- 13.10
23.02'\1t
SAVANNAH PARKWAY
1.S.45$'4 SEC,16.2'A-UMINUM CAP d 5ry REBAR STAMPED PFR 218P.M 17, DESNOYSBY CONSTRUCTIONTOBE w(l) q 15 1-EIPI.E. P.U.E(1) -l -Lo--19-3P-------qo SCALE:1"=40'
F|NAL MAP (PN 17-307.03)
MANGINI RANCH
PHASE 2.VILI,I,GE 3
]- RESET WTH MONUMEffi WELL PER COUNry STNDffiDS
T I r5L.E./P.A.E. MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 LARGE tOT LOT 13 412 8.M.7
I.O,D. CITY OF FOLSOM
2A21A402 0.R. 0622
LoT 2o(1 ) P.U.E(1)
BEING A MERGER AND RESUBDVISION OF LOT 3 AND LOT $ OF THAT CERTAINFINAL MAP NTLED'MANGINI RANCH PSSE 2 HRGE LOT', FILED FOR RECORO ON JULY 2,2019, IN BOOK412OF MAPSAT PACE7, SACRAMENTO COUNfl RECOROS, BEINC A PORNON OF SECTION 16, TOMSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 ilST M.D,B,M.
CITY OF FOLSOM. SACRAMENTO COUNTY ' CALIFORNIA
APRIL2022
SHEET 4 OF 6 SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES AND SEE SHEET 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES. mAC[ilY&somPs EXGtffi FsXft S@B rGctrils&R@d0sohs0 tur' dem 0Dtliis
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
22.15 L=33.19
I
6,106 SF
o
€
3 4,4S SF
g
t0
4 4,245 SF
A=2'43'35'
s.00
8 4,125SF
----r
9 4,{9SF
14.14 50.00'
r!9JgBr P u erP*rre' 1.26a.27,
N
MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2
TARGE LOT
LOT 17 SEE SHEET 6
40 ?",PU
" 2)Q '\"";,,h,a
\ r".;
Line Table
Len9lh
6J04.00'
20!1'
8.00 12-0t
Curue Table
Leqh
?7.39'4.03'11.2226.13'
13.S'37.9'59-4S',8.2t1058'
25.@'2+51'70,67
&adng
N88'57's'E(R)N80'57 S'E (R)
N16'4ffi(R)N16'4'S'W{R)N16'4'W(R)
fth74',27'47'
1 l'05'09"31'58at43'0t24',
58'45'51'2f22'14',
21055'115 28"
30'31'4's'01 25"
20.00'
20.0058.00'[email protected]
50.00'$.0022S0'
280.tr'
1139.m'
46_00'46.00'
LI
L2
L3L4L5
c1
c2c3
c1c5G
c1c8c9
c10
c11cI2
LOT C
12,079SF
L.E.
6d l+ . "t"
\ d,
412 B.M 7
a 27.49
121 22 '
a=9"6'o9I
L=1159
22'
DANDELION WAY
LoT A(r
)
Lat
P.U,E./P.A,E.
15'1.E./P.A.E.
P.U-E.(1) -f
39 41 42 R=22Boo'
LOT D
12.5'
3E
_t
1?.4
,oirouo
.) 66
i
I
r9
18 tFtilLUIU)IJ.J ulo
-\\
{
i
h'
il
't;t
xl
rII
2'l
I
22 2'
?
=z
o
=@
tuc
,q
z
*t 2?"
FI5l
I
LOT B
SMUD SITE
20r 70608 0.R.
1274 & 1271
LoT 9(1)
't
I '--t
----l
J
R=4-00'
SNAPDRAGON WAY
12.5'P.U.E.
SAVANNAH PARKWAY
12.5P.U.E.
_-B-=J9..09_s!3_"_3q{qEBl
R= s0.00 N59'$4'E(R) l 62
IL
15'
,42'
20 +
20 SMUD SITE
20170608 0.R
1270 & 1271
2q
DETAIL'B'
1"=Y
0204040
--:SCALE: 1"-4O'
FINAL MAP (PN 17-307.03)
MANGINI RANCH
PHASE 2 -]rI'LLAGE 3
l--
SEE DETAIL "8"ON THIS SHEET
s(1)
"D-^- _.1
-r
15 LE.PA.E.
P.U.E(1)
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES AND SEE SHEET 3 FORBASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
MANCINI RANCH PHASE 2 TARCE LOT
toT 13
412 B.M.7
I,O.D. CITY OF FOLSOM
20214402 0.R. 0622
BEING A MERGER AND RESUBDVISION OF LOT 3 AND LOT il OF THAT CERTAINflNAL MP TILED'MNGINI RANCH PHASE 2 NRGE LOT" FILED FOR RECORD ON JULY 2.2019, IN BOOK412 OF MAPS AT PAGE 7, SACRAMENTO COUNry RECORDS.
BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 SST, M.D.B.M.
CITY OF FOLSOM. SACRAMENTO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
MACIGY&SOMPS H@EE6 PuB $ffiN ,q$m pi6)tH1e SHEET 5 OF 6 APRIL 2022 R=rc.@
28 4,830SF
:aLz'
I
12.5 P.U.E.---]
t
27 4,125 SF
I_
4,16SF
55i0'
4,125SF
55-m'
24 4,125SF
55.00'
23 4,125SF
55.00 E
' s5 oo'
!3
:
t:
r
I
u
4,125SF
22 4,125SF
55.00'
55.00 3
5s.00'
21 4,125SFt___
36 4,125 SF
-T----
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
42 6.627SF
38_60
L=36.16'
L=49.80
R=188.00
41 5,2SSF
33.6 ______1
46 \.
4.125SF
47 4,789SF
L=21J$
49 6,112 SF
A=2'4911' /4,7SSF
50 5206 SF
R:2000'
5,€1 SF
L=31.42' 1_
SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTES AND SEE SHEET 3 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, LEGEND AND REFERENCES ^'Jo
LOT C
12,079SF
F|NAL MAP (PN 17-307.03)
MANGINI RANCH
PFTASE 2 -VILLAGE 3
AEING A MERGER AND RESUBDMSION OF LOT 3 AND LOT 3A OF THAT CERTAINFINAL ffiP TITLED'MNGINI RANCH PUSE 2 NRGE LOT. FILED FOR RECORD ON JULY 2, rc19, IN BOOK 412 OF MAPS AT PAGE 7. SACRAMENTO COUNry RECORDS.
EEING A PORTION OF SECTION 15, TOWSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 8 AST, M.D.B.M. clTY oF FoLSoM. SACRAMENTO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
o L,E.
LOCANON
OF PROrcSS BIKE TMIL RUSSEL RANCH
LARGE tOT
398 B.M. l
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
1 a?
nmKil&s0mPs HdE6 PWErc $RE6 .cA$m €6)miis APRIL 2022 SHEET 6 OF 6 0204080
---l SCALE: 1"-40'
SHEET 6 OF 6
I
\
5 ,i Curue Table
Leqb60.40'5E.10'
60.9716.@
15'2655'
18'34'S'18.9'53"
4'053r
24.W210.@'
1ffi.@
224.09
c1
c3a
Line Table
teng$
400
g€ing
LI N57"2912U
pe
I .p
MANGINI RANCH
MANCINI RANCH PHASE 2
LARGE LOT
LOT 16
412 B.M. 1
PHASE 2
LARGE LOT
LOT 17
412 8.M.7
I
I
I
OF MOPOSED
1z.i L.E.
P,U,E.
PLE.i1)
29 RUSSELL RANCH
PHASE 'I
VILLAGE 6
4 r0 B.M. 2
APPROXIME LOSIS 9\"oi '
a 12.5
--ws7s-Eafi12.5 P.V.E. 316.75
DANDELION WAY
33 32 J1
I d
I
(o"
\
LOT C
12,079SF
t
/
+9
+
P.U.E/P}.E.
LoT s(r)
12.5 L.E./
n
& {
zl
I
I
2'
14 | "'
I
I
I
I
9 L.E.
JO 30_5
J6 35 34
SEE
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
ATTACHMENT 4
MANGINI RANCH PIIASE 2 VILLAGE NO.3 VESTING
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
SEE RIGHT FOR VILLAGES 5 & 6
O- .-se+-
I lllJJ"r-!.I I L+{#- tcnf
L-.l---t!
li r'
&si !-_ -\i I
rulrIlilI ll1'r|]-"..4t l'jJ.!,:]l-4 -F---r- VILLAGES 5 & 6 r
*+
Ttr
.6+-
e2
r'*--l uAllqgs0!$
villlgc2
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
ATTACHMENT 5
TABLE OF'CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGINI
RANCH PHASE 2YTLLAGE NO. 3 VESTING TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDTVISION PROJECT (PN 17-307)
WEST OFPLACERI'ILLE ROAD, NORTH OFWEITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OT'USHIGHWAYSO
SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE STIBDIVTSION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The Community DevelopmentDepartment has reviewed and approvedthe improvement plans and the final map for the project. The approved
improvement plans are in substantialcompliance with the grading and drarnage plans, the site and utility plans, offsite
infiastructure exhibit, the preliminary
landscape plans and the design guidelines.The final map for Village 3 is in substantial compliance with the approved
Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
(PNl7-307) was approved by the CityCouncil on February 13, 2018.(ResolutionNo 10069) Responsible
Department
cD (PXE)
When
RequiredG, I,M,B
Condition of Approval
Fin al D ev elop ment P I ans
The owner/applicant shall submit final site development plans to the Community Development Departmentthat shall substantially conlbrm to the exhibits referenced below:
2. Vicinity Map 3. Illustrative Master Plan Exhibit, dated December 15,2017
4. Luge-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, dated December I 5, 2017 5. Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, dated December 1 5, 20176. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, dated December 15, 2017
7. Preliminary Utility Plan, dated December 15,2017 8. Conceptual Phasing Plan, dated December 15,201'7 9. On-Site Infrastructure Phasing Exhibit, dated December 15,2017
10. On-Site Infiastructure Phasing Narrative, dated December 74,2017 1 L Preliminary Phased Off-Site Utility Plan, dated September, 201 712. Oft'-Site Infrastructure Triggers, dated December, 20171 3. Interim Off-Site Intersection Design, dated December 15, 201714. Trail System Modification Exhibit, dated December 15,2017I 5. Noise Mitigation Exhibit and Conceptual Wall and Fencing Exhibit, dated December 15 , 2017
16. Inclusionary Housing Plan, dated September 26,201717. Parks and Open Space Ownership,4\4aintenance Summary, dated December 14,20171 8. Minor Administrative Modification ExhibitsI 9. Folsom Ranch Central District Guidelines Addendum, dated December, 201 7 The Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is approved for the development of a 545-unit residentialsubdivision (Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision). Implementation of the project shall be consistent with theabove referenced items and these conditions ofapproval.
Condition
No.
Resolution No. 10069Page 1 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
C0NDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGTM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIyISTON PROJECT (PN 17-307)
WEST OFPLACERI'ILLE ROAD, NORTE OI'WETTE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD, AND SOUTH OF USMGHWAYSO SMALL-LOT I'ESTING TEiYTA,TTYE SI]BDTVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Comments
Improvement plans for the Village 3subdivision have been reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Department. Grading and
construction commenced in thissubdivision in the Spring of 2022.
Landscape and Inigation plans for this
subdivision reviewed and approved prior
to the first building permit issuance in thesubdivision.The City Council approved the Small LotVesting Tentative Map on February 13,2018. (ResolutionNo. 10069)The Owner/applicant has complied withall applicable mitigation measures from the FEIR/EIS prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. Additionally,construction inspection and monitoring isbeing conducted throughout construction by the City and,/or its Consultants.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (P)(EXB)
cD (P)
CD (PXE)
When
Required
G,I, M,
OG
M
Condition of Approval
Plan Submittal
All civil engineering, improvement, and landscape and irrigation plans, shall be submitted to the CommunityDevelopment Department for review and approval to ensure conformance with this approval and withrelevant codes, policies, standards and other requirements ofthe Cify ofFolsom.
Validity
This approval of the Vesting Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map shall be valid for a period of twenty-fowmonths pursuant to Section 16.16.110A of the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. Theterm ofthe approved Inclusionary Housing Plan shall track the term ofthe Vesting Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, as may be extended from time to time pursuant to Section 16. 16.110.A and 16.16.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The term of the Project Design Guidelines shalltrack the term of the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Asreement.
Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Approval
The Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision project shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council.
Condition
No.
2 3
4 Resolution No. 10069Page 2 of61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
The Final Map for Village 3 includes
street names chosen from the approvedlist in this condition.
The owner/applicant is in compliance
with all plan area wide obligations. These
conditions of approval require certainimprovements during buildout of thisTentative Map. The owner/applicant has been required to consftuct these
improvements as needed and inconjunction with the other subdivisions under development. Grading and
construction in this subdivisioncommenced in the Spring of 2020.
Comments
CD (EXP)
CD(EXP)(B),
PW, FD,
EWR, PR
Responsible
Department
M
When
Required
M
Street Names
The street names identified below shall be used for the Final Small-Lot Map:
Savannah Parkway, Alder Creek Parkway, Weshvood Drive, Dandelion Lane, Golden Wave Drive, GardnerStreet, Persimmon Way, Sassafras Trail, Hackbeny Lane, Arbor View Drive, Emerald Knoll Lane, Copper Rrdge Drive, Field View Trail, Eagle Ridge Lane, Spice Wood Court, Willow Grove Street, Cimarron Tratl,Vista Grande Drive, Sienna Bluff Trail, Lilac Circle, Butterfly Ridge, Spring Harvest Trail, Barnwood Drive, Barn Owl Drive, Triple Creek Way, Crooked Bed Trail, Deer Point Court, Blacktail Way, Willowick Lane, shadow creek circle, Dragonfly way, old Ranch Road, whispering Brook way, Shakers Ridge way,Quakie Glen Drive, Shale Rock Court, Wind River Range Lane, Owl Creek Drive, Drowsy Water Way,Cackleberry Court, Quail Meadow Way, Tall Oaks Bend, Stone View Trail, Snapdragon Lane, Timberline Meadow Wav. Trails End. Broken Oak Lane, Bitterroot Lane.
Condition of Approval
Improvements in the PFFPThe owner/applicant shall be subject to all thresholds, timelines and deadlines for the construction and final completion of various improvements for the entire Folsom Plan Area. The various improvements are outlined and detailed in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) dated January 28, 2014 and adopted by City of Folsom Resolution No. 9298. These improvements in the PFFP include, but are not limited to, the backbone inflastructure water (water reservoirs, water transmission mains, booster pumpstations, pressgre reducing valve stations, etc.), sanrtary sewer (lift stations and forced mains) systems,recycled water mains and associated infrastructure, roadway and transportation (future interchanges, major arterial roadways, etc.) improvements, aquatic center (community pool), parks, fire stations, municipalservices center, communtty library, etc The thesholds and timelines included in the PFFP require facilities tobe constructed and completed based on number of building permits issued and in some cases, number ofresidential units that are occupied. The owner/applicant shall be required to address these thresholds andtimelines as the project moves forward though the various developments stages and shall be subject to the various fair share requirements, subject to the provisions of the PFFP, the ARDA and any amendmentthereto. 6 WEST OT'PLACERVILLEROAD, NORTHOFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTII OF' USHIGHWAYSl) OF APPROVAL FOR THE RANCH PHASE 2 STIBDTyISION PROJECT (PN 17-307) TENTATTVE SUBDT!'ISION
No.
Condition
5 Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SIIBDTVISTON PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OF PLACERVILLf,ROAD, NORTEOFWIIITE ROCKROAD, EASTOF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OFUS HIGHWAYSO SMALL.LOT VESTING TENTATTYE SI]BDIITSION MAP
Condifion
Satisfied?
Yes
Yes
Comments
The City standard subdivisionimprovement agreement includeslanguage that satisfies this condition. Thesubdivision improvement agreement will be executed by the City Manager upon
approval by the City Council.The Owner/applicant has complied withall applicable mitigation measures fiom the FEIR/EIS prior to the issuance ofa
grading permit for this subdivision in the
Spring of 2022. Additionally,
construction inspection and monitoring isconducted throughout construction by theCity and/or its Consultants to verifucomoliance.
Responsible
Department
cD (PXEXB)
PW, PR, FD,
PDCD
When
Required
OG
OG
Condition of Approval
Indemnity for City
The owner/applicant shall protect, defend, indemnifu, and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers andemployees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any ofits agencies, departments, commissions,agents, officers, employees, or legislative body concerning the project, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable statutes of limitation. The City will promptly notifu the owner/applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City should fail to cooperate firlly in the defense,the owner owner/applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnifu and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees, pursuant to this condition. The City may, within its unlimiteddiscretion, participate in the defense ofany such claim, action or proceeding ifboth ofthe following occur:
oa
The City bears its own attomey's f-ees and costs; andThe City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith The owner/applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement ofsuch claim, action orproceeding unless the settlement is approved by the owner/applicant. The owner/applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to this project.
Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
The Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision map is expressly conditioned upon compliance with allenvironmental mitigation measures in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FEIR/EIS) as amended by theWestland,/Eagle Specific Plan Amendment CEQA Addendum, and the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Revised Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative CEQA Addendum as well as compliance with the mitigation measures in the South of U.S. Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Project MitigatedNegative Declaration for those portions of Mangini Ranch Phase 2 that are included as part of the South ofU.S. Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Proje ct.
Condition
No.
7 8.
Resolution No. 10069Page 4 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
COI\DITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGIM RANCE PEASE 2 SUBDwISION PROJf, CT (PN 1 7-307) WEST OFPLACERI'ILLEROAD, NORTflOFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AI\D SOUTE OFUSHIGHWAYS() SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATI!'E (rTDnrl/rcrrl]\T I/fa D
Condition
Satis{ied?
Yes
Yes
POLICE/SECUR]TY REQUIREMENT
OG CD (PXE)
The owner provided onsite securityduring construction and has incorporatedline ofsight guidelines into landscaping plans at intersections
Yes lt
12. The owner/applicant shall consult with the Police Departrnent in order to incorporate all reasonable crime G,I, B PD prevention measures. The following security/safety measures shall be considered:
r A security guard on-duty at all times at the site or a six-foot security fence shall be constructed around the perimeter of construction areas.
o Security measures for the safety ofall construction equipment and unit appliances. o Landscaping shall not cover exterior doors or windows, block line-of-sight at intersections or screen overhead
DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND FEE
Taxes and Fees
The owner/applicant. shall pay all applicable taxes, fees and charges for the project at the rate and amount required by the Public Facilities Financing Plan and Amendment No. I to the Amended and Restated Tier I The owner paid all current taxes and Yes
fees associated with this subdivision.
Comments
The owner/applicant has complied with
all applicable provisions ofthe respective
Amended and Restated Tier 1Development Agreement.The owner has funded and participated in a MMRP reporting program performed by
the City's consultant (Helix) and/or staffthroughout the cowse ofgrading and construction.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E)
cD (P)
When
Required
G, I,M,B
OG
Condition of Approval
ARDA and Amendments
The owner/applicant shall comply with all provisions of Amendments No. I and 2 to the First Amended andRestated Tier 1 Development Agreement and any approved amendments thereafter by and between the City and the owner/applicant ofthe project.
Mitigation Monitoring
The owner/applicant shall participate in a mitigation monitoring and reporting program pursuant to City CouncilResolutionNo.2634andPublicResourcesCode2l08l.6. Themitigationmonitoringandreporting measures identified in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan FEIR/EIS, the South of50 Backbone Infrastructure Project MND, the Westland,{Eagle Specific Plan Amendment to the FPASP and Addendum tothe FPASP EIR/EIS, and the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Revised Proposed OffSite Water Facility Alternative Amendment to the FPASP and Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS have been rncorporated into these conditions ofapproval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on theenvironment. These mitigation monitoring and reporting measures are identified in the mitigation measure column. Applicant shall fund on a Time and Materials basis all mitigation monitoring (e.g., staff andconsultant time Condition
No.
9 10.
Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TIIf, MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SI'BDWISION PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OF PLACERVILLEROAD, NORTE OFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTII OF US HIGHWAY50 SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATTVE SIIRNTVISTr)NMAP
Condition
Satislied?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Comments
The owner has paid all taxes and fees
associated with thrs subdivision and fileda tax segregation request for applicable taxes.
The Owner/Applicant shall pay allrequired City fees and Plan Area wide fees prior to issuance ofbuilding permits.
The City has not yet utilized any outsideservices for any type oflegal issues for this subdivision. If at any time during the
development ol this subdivision, any
outside legal services were necessary, theowner/applicant would be required to conform to this condition.
Responsible
Department
CD (E)
cD (P), PW,
PK
CD (PXE)
When
Required
OG
B
OG
Condition of Approval
Assessments
Ifapplicable, the owner/applicant shall pay offany existing assessments against the property, or file necessary segregation request and pay applicable fees.
FPASP Development Impact Fees
The owner/applicant shall be subject to all Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Area development impact f'ees inplace at the trme ofapproval or subsequently adopted consistent with the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), Development Agreement and amendments thereto, unless exempt by previous agreement. Theouner/applicant shall be subject to all applicable Folsom Plan Area plan-wide development impact f'ees ineffect at such time that a building permit is issued. These fbes may include, but are not limited to, the FolsomPlan Area Specific Plan Fee, Specific Plan Inlrastructure Fee (SPIF), Solid Waste Fee, Corporation Yard Fee,Transportation Management Fee, Transit Fee, Highway 50 Interchange Fee, General Park Equipment Fee,Housing Trust Fee, etc.
Any protest to such fbr all fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this project will beginon the date of final approval ( February 1 3, 20 1 8), or otherwise shall be governed by the terms ofAmendments No. I and 2 to ARDA. The fees shall be calculated at the fee rate set forth in the PFFP and theARDA.
Legal Counsel
The Cify, at its sole discretion, may utilize the services ofoutside legal counsel to assist in theimplementation of this project, including, but not limited to, drafting, reviewing and/or revising agreements and/or other documentation for the project. Ifthe Cify utilizes the services ofsuch outside legal counsel, theCity shall provide notice to the owner/applicant ofthe outside counsel selected, the scope ofwork and howly rates, and the owner/applicant shall reimburse the City for all outside legal fees and costs incurred and documented by the City for such services. The ovvner/applicant may be required, at the sole discretion of theCity Attorney, to submit a deposit to the City for these services prior to initiation of the services. Theowner/applicant shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for the services regardless ofwhether adeoosit is reouired.
Condition
No.
1314
.t5.
ResolutionNo. I0069Page 6 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
Condition
will be
satisfied prior
to building
permit
issuance in
the
subdivision.
Condition
Satisfied?
The owneriapplicant will submit
landscape and streetscape plans to theCommunity Development Department.The Community DevelopmentDepartment will verifu that the landscape and streetscape plans include the required
wall, fences and gates and that these
improvements are in compliance with the
Folsom Ranch Central District Design
Guidelines.
Comments
The City has provided notice to theowner/applicant for various Consultantsperforming sewices for the development of this subdivision. The City has
collected deposits from the
owner/applicant in advance of such work
for these services.
cD (PXE)
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (PXE)
When
Required
G,I, M, B
B
Consultant Services
Ifthe City utilizes the services ofconsultants to prepare special studies or provide specialized design review or inspection services fbr the project, the City shall provide notice to the owneriapplicant ofthe outsideconsultant selected, the scope of work and howly rates, and the owner/applicant shall reimburse the City tbr actual costs incurred and documented in utilizing these services, including administrative costs for City personnel. A deposit for these services shall be provided prior to initiating review ofthe Grading Plan, Final or whichever is
lValls/Fences/Gates
The final location, design, height, materials, and colors ofthe walls, fences, and gates shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department to ensure consistency with the FolsomRanch Central District Design Guidelines.
Condition of Approval Condition No.
t7
WEST OF PLACER\,'ILLEROAD, NORTHOFWHITE ROCKROAD, EASTOF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTE OFUS HIGHWAYSO PHASE 2 SUBDr\TSTONPROJECT CONDITIONS APPROVAL FOR THE MANGIM RANCH (PN 17-307) vESTING MAP
16. Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF' APPROVAL FOR TIIE MANGIM RANCH 2 SITBDTVTSTONPROJECT (PN 17-307) WESTOFPLACERI'ILLf,ROAD, NORTEOtr'WHITEROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OFUSHIGHWAYSO SMALL-LOT !'ESTING TNNTATTVT] St JBDTVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The owner has submitted and obtained
approval by the City ofa phasrng plan for
Development Phase I of the Mangini
Ranch Phase 2 Vesting Tentative
Subdivision Map, which includes Village3. The following addresses the improvements necessary to serve Village3:
Alder Creek Parkway is not required to
provide access to the Village 3
subdivision.
Roadway improvements to provide accessto the Village 3 subdivision have been constructed with the approved Village 1,
2 and 7 improvement plans and the
approved Enclave at Folsom Ranch Offsite Improvement Plans. These roadwayimprovements included East Bidwell Street, Old Ranch Way, Westwood Drive
and Savannah Parkway. These
improvements have been constructed and
have been accepted by the City in the
Spring of2022. The extension ofSavannah Parkway to Grand Prairie Roadis currently under construction and will provide vehicular access to Village 3. It isexpectedthat the Village 3 subdivision improvements and the extension ofSavannah Parkway will be complete inthe Fall of 2022 ResponsibleDepartment
CD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
G, I,M
Condition of Approval
Development Phase I (Villages 1,2,7) Plan
The owner/applicant shall construct the following improvements as shown on the Vesting Tentative Subdtvision Map with each applicable phase. Roadways shall be to the ultimate horizontal and verticalalignment unless otherwise noted.
Roads . Alder Creek Parkway (East Bidwell Street to Placerville Road) r One lane of travel in each direction (These roadway improvements are existing improvements belng constructed with FPA Phase I Backbone Improvements) o Intersection and median pocket improvements are described in following three phases o
East Bidwell Street (Alder Creek Parkway to the interface of Mangini Ranch Phase I Subdivision Project)r One lane of travel in each direction (These roadway improvements are existing-improvements constructed with FPA Phase I Backbone Improvements)
. Intersection of Savannah Parkway and East Bidwell Street including turn lanes (as shown on Attachment lllOft'-Site Infrastructure Triggers, December-2Ol7iRequired Prior to First Building Permit)
o Control: Stop-Sign control at the westbound approach to East Bidwell Street from Savannah Parkway with full access.
o Southbound Approach to Savannah Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thruJane, and one left-turn lane with a 200-foot long transition, 60-footJong taper, and 100 feet ofvehiclestorage. o Northbound Approach to Savarurah Parkway fiom East Bidwell Street: One shared thn-r/right-tum lane.
o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street from Savannah Parkway: One shared left/righttum lane, and a striped out left-turn pocket wrth a 125-fooGlong taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.
Condition
No.t8
Resolution No. 10069Page 8 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied? Comments Responsible Department
cD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
G,I, M
When
Condition Required ofApproval
Betureen Old Ranch Way and the southern boundary of the project site, East shall be constructed as a two-lane arterial on the eastem "half segment" of its ultimateconfiguration. This twolane segment shall have a striped 2-foot-wide median south of OldRanch Way, consistent with the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Figure 34-107 (CA), or similar standard. The southbound left-hrn pocket shallbe developed in accordance with the Highway Design Manual (HDM) Figure 405-24, orsimilar standard. Savannah Parkway shall have a raised median curb.
Intersection of Old Ranch Way and East Bidwell Street including turn lanes o Control: All-Way Stop-Sign control at the intersection of East Bidwell Street and Old Ranch Way with fu1l access.
o Southbound Approach to old Ranch way from East Bidwell Street: one thrulane and one left-tum lane.
o Northbound Approach to Old Ranch Way fiom East Bidwell Street: One shared thru/righthrrn lane.o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street lrom Old Ranch Way: One shared leftiright-tum lane.Village 7 EntrancelExit on East Bidwell Street
o Control: Stop-Sign control at the Village 7 exit to East Bidwell Street.o Access to Village 7 from East Bidwell Street limited to right-tums in and right-twns out only. Measures to enforce the right-turn in and right-tum out restriction at this location shallbe implemented to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.Frontage Improvements on East Bidwell Street o Frontage Improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping along the east srde ofEast Bidwell Street trom Savannah Parkway to the southern project boundary with theMangini Ranch Phase 1 Subdivision project. o
a
a
a
Bidwell Street
WEST OF PLACERITILLE ROAD, NORTE OF WIITTE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF SCOTT ROAD, AND SOUTII OF US EIGIITVAY 50 CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL THE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 PROJECT (PN 17-307)
VESTING TENTA MAP
No.
Condition
t8
Cont.
Resolution No. 10069Page 9 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CoNDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR Tm MANGIIYI RANCH PTTASE 2 SIIBDMSTON PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OF PLACERITLLE ROA.D, NORTE OFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OT SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OF USHTGIIWAYSO SMALL.LOT VESTING TANTATIVE ST]BDIVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
Roadway improvements to SavannahParkway have been constructed with the Village 1, 2 and 7 subdivision
improvement plans. These improvements
have been completed and accepted by the
City in the Spring of 2022.
Additional roadway improvements to
Savannah Parkway east ofthe westerly
Yillage 2 subdivision boundary to the
intersection of Grand Prairie Road have
been approved by the City and are
currently under construction. These
roadway improvements will providevehicular access to Village 3 and will be complete in the Fall of 2022.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
G,I, M
Condition of Approval
Savannah Parkway @ast Bidwell Street East Bidwell Street to the eastem edge of Open Space Lots I and L) . One lane oftravel in each direction and a landscaped median ofvarying widths. r Intersection of Savannah Parkway and Westwood Drive including turn lanes o Westbound approach to Westwood Drive fiom Savannah Parkway:
One through lane, one right-tum lane, and one left-tum lane. The right-tum pocket will haveal25-foot-longtaperand2l0feetofvehiclestorage. Theleft-turnlanewillhaveal25-footlong taper with 60 feet ofvehicle storage. o Eastbound approach to Westwood Drive from Savannah Parkway:
One shared through/right-hrn lane and one left-turn lane. The left-tum lane will have a 125-foot-long taper with 60 feet ofvehicle storage. o Northbound approach to Savannah Parkway from Westwood Drive:
One shared through lane/right-tum lane and one left-turn lane. The lefttum lane will have a l25-fbot-longtaperwith60feetofvehiclestorage. A60-foot-longtaperwillbeprovidedtbr the right-turn movement.
r Village 1 Entrance,/Exit and Turn Pockets
o Control: Stop-Sign control at the Village 1 exit to Savannah Parkway.o Westbound left-turn pocket into Village I entrance from Savannah Parkway with a 125-footlong taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.o Eastbound left-tum pocket at Savannah Parkway/Ylllage I intersection with l25-fbot-long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.
. Frontage Improvements on Savannah Parkway
o Frontage Improvements along the southern side ofSavannah Parkway including curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, and landscaping along with the remainder of paving required to complete the roadway sections K and Kl to the eastem edge ofOpen Space Lots I and J as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
Westwood Drive (Savannah Parkway to the interface of Mangini Ranch Phase 1, including the Alder Creek Tributary creek crossing). One lane oftravel in each directiono Frontage improvements on Westwood Drive including cwb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, medians along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Sections U, Vl and V-2 as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map olutionNo.10069
Condition
No.
l8
Cont.
Re
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied?
Alder Creek Parkway is not required to Yesprovide access to the Village 3 subdivision.Roadway improvements to provide accessto the Village 3 subdivisionhave been constructed with the approved Village 1,
2 and 7 improvement plans and theapproved Enclave at Folsom Ranch Offsite Improvement Plans. These roadway improvements included East BidwellStreet, Old Ranch Way, Westwood Driveand Savannah Parkway. These improvements have been constructed and
have been accepted by the City in the
Spring of 2022.
Comments Responsible Department
cD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
G,I, M
Condition of Approval
Westwood Drive (Alder Creek Parkway to Old Ranch Way) . One lane oftravel in each drrection (The Enclave at Folsom Ranch Subdivision project (PN 16- 025) is currently conditioned to complete these improvements) . Intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive including turn lanes o Control: All-Way Stop-Sign control at the :intersection of Westwood Drive and Alder Creek Parkway with full access.
o Westbound Approach to Westwood Drive from Alder Creek Parkway: One shared tkouglVright-tum lane, and one leftturn lane with a 125-foot long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage. o Northbound Approach to Alder Creek Parkway fiom Westwood Drive: One shared tkough/right-turn lane, and one left-tum lane with a 125-foot long taper and 21 0 feet ofvehicle storage. A 60-foollong taper will be provided for the right-tum movement. o Eastbound Approach to Westwood Drive from Alder Creek Parkway: One through lane, one right-turn lane and one left-turn lane.
r Intersection of Old Ranch Way and Westwood Drive including turn lanes o Eastbound Approach to Westwood Drive from Old Ranch Way: One shared through/rightturn lane, and one left-hrm lane with a I 25-foot long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.o Southbound Approach to Old Ranch Way from Westwood Drive: One shared through/rightturn lane, and one left-turn lane with a 125-foot long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage. . Frontage Improvements on Westwood Drive
o Frontage Improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with the remainder of paving required to complete the roadway section K2 as shown on the SmallLot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
Old Ranch Way (East Bidwell Street to Westwood Drive). One lane oftravel in each direction (The Enclave at Folsom Ranch Subdivision prolect (PN 16- 025) is currently conditioned to complete these improvements) o Frontage improvements along the southern side including curb, gutter and sidewalk and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section S and S I as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
CON'DITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDTYISION
WEST OF PLACERVILLEROAD, NORTE OT'WHTTE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTII OF US MGIIWAYSO PROJECT (PN 17-307)
TENTATIVE SI]BDTIISION
No.
Condition
18. Cont.
Resolution No 10069Page I I of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SIJEDTVTSTON PROJECT eN r 7-307) WEST OF PLACERVILLE ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF SCOTT ROAD, AI\D SOUTII OF US IIIGEWAY 50 SMALL.LOT I'ESTING TENTATTI/E SI]BDWISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Commenfs
Underground water, sanitary sewer, storm
drainage and public utility infrastructure
will be constructed as a part of the
Savannah Parkway roadway constructionextension which are required to serveVillage 3, Hydro-modification Basin 19has been included in the Enclave Offsite improvements plans and is required to becompleted prior to the issuance of anybuilding permits in Village 3There are no trarls being constructed inthe open space adjoining the Village 3 subdivision. The trails are being roughgraded by the Subdivider and the City will construct the trails in the future.
The owner/applicant commenced withgrading the entire Mangini Ranch Phase 2 subdivision in the Spring of2019.
Throughout the grading in the future
yezus, excess spoils will be placed in the
future Communitv Park East.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E),
EWR, PW
FD
When
Required
G,I, M
Condition of Approval
o Utilitylnfrastructure . The utilities shall be constructed concurrent with the roadway phasing, as deemed appropriate and necessary to support the particular phase by the City Engineer. . A particular development phase may be developed into sub-phases in which the roadway and utility phasing may change. If sub-phasing is proposed, the City Engineer shall determine what roadway and utility improvements are appropriate and necessary to serye the sub-phase. ' Hydromodification Basins No. 19 and No. 23 shall be constructed with Phase 1, unless already constructed by Others.
o Trails in Open Space
. No trails within Phase I
o Park Grading
. Communiry Park East will serve as a spoils site during Phase 1 grading. Grading of the park will be completed in subsequent phases.
Condition
No.
18. Cont.
Resolution No. 10069Page 12 of 61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CoNDTTIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TIrE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDTyISION PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OF PLACERVILLEROA-D, NORTH OFWIIITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTfi OFUS HIGHWAYSO SMALL-LOT I'ESTING TENTATI!'E SI-IBDNASION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The improvement plans for the roadwayimprovements for Savannah Parkway from the easterly boundary ofVillage 2 to
Grand Prairie Road necessary to serve
Village 3 have been reviewed and
approved by the City. These roadway
improvements are currently under
construction and are expected to becomplete in the Fall of 2022.The roadway improvements to Weshvood Drive between Savannah Parkway and
Old Ranch Way were included in theapproved improvement plans for Village2. These improvements commenced in the Summer of 2020 and have been
completed and accepted by the City in the
Spring of2022.
The required improvements to Old Ranch
Way and Alder Creek Parkway in this
condition have been constructed andaccepted by the City, These roadwayimprovements were required as acondition ofapproval for the Village 4 &8 subdivisions approved by the CityCouncil in July of2020.
Responsible
Department
cD (E),
EWR, PW
FD
When
Required
G, I,M
Condition of Approval
Development Phase 2 (Wlages 3,4, 8, and Lots C & D)PlanDeveloper shall construct the following improvements as shown on the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map & Conceptual Development Phasing Diagram unless otherwise noted; Roadwaysshall be constructed to the ultimate horizontal and vertical alignment unless otherwise noted. o Roads . Savannah Parlway (Eastern edge of Open Space Lots I and L to SMIID Substation) . One lane oftravel in each direction and median . Village 3 Entrance,/Exit on Savannah Parkway
o Control: Stop-Sign control at the Village 3 exit to Savannah Parkway.o Eastbound left-hrm lane fiom Savannah Parlovay into Village 3 entrance with 125-fbot-long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.
o Frontage improvements along the northern side ofSavannah Parkway including curb, gutter and sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section K as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map. o Park Frontage improvements are the responsibility of the City.
Westwood Drive (Savannah Parkway to Old Ranch Way)
. One lane oftravel in each directiono Intersection of Old Ranch Way and Westwood Drive rncluding tum lanes o Northbound Approach to Old Ranch Way liom Westrvood Drive: One shared through/righf turnlane,andoneleft-turnlanewithal25-footlongtaperand60feetofvehiclestorage. A 60-foot-long taper will be provided for the right-nrrn movement. o Westbound Approach to Westwood Drive from Old Ranch Way: One shared through/rightturn lane, and one left-turn lane with a 125-foot long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage. r Intersection of Savannah Parkway and Westwood Drive including tum lanes o Southbound Approach to Savannah Parkway fiom Westwood Drive: One shared througl/right-turn lane, and one left-turn lane with a 125-foot long taper and 90 feet ofvehicle storage. A 60-foot-long taper will be provided for the right-turn movement.
I
Condition
No.19.
Resolution No. 10069Page 13 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The improvement plans for the roadway
improvements for Savannah Parkwayfrom the easterly boundary ofVillage 2 toGrand Prairie Road necessary to serveVillage 3 have been reviewed and approved by the Cify. These roadwayimprovements are currently underconstruction and are expected to be complete in the Fall o12022.The roadway improvements to WestwoodDrive between Savannah Parkway and Old Ranch Way were included in theapproved improvement plans for Village2. These improvements commenced in the Summer of2020 and have beencompleted and accepted by the City in the Spring of 2022.
The required rmprovements to Old Ranch
Way and Alder Creek Parkway in this
condition have been constructed andaccepted by the City. These roadwayrmprovements were required as acondition of approval for the Village 4 & 8 subdivisions approved by the CityCouncil in July of2020.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E),
EWR, PW
FD
G,I, MWhen
Condition Required of Approval . Frontage Improvements on Westwood Drive o Frontage improvements along the westem side of Westwood Drive including cwb, gutter and sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section K as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
Old Ranch Way (Westwood Drive to Village 4)
r One lane oftravel in each direction . Frontage improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, median and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section V-4 as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
. Park & School frontage including cwb, gutter, and 10-foot-wide sidewalk with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section V-4 as shown on the Small-Lot VestingTentative Subdivision Map. Park frontage improvements are the responsibility of the City.
Alder Creek Parlway (Westwood Drive to Placerville Road)e One lane oftravel in each direction and median (Existing travel lanes on Alder Creek Parkway constructed with FPA Phase 1 Backbone Improvements)
. Village 8 Entrance/Exit on Savannah Parkway
o Westbound left-hrrn lane from Alder Creek Parkway into Village 8 entrance with 125-footlong taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage. o Intersection of East Bidwell Street and Alder Creek Parkway (as shown on Attachment 1l/OffSite Infrastructure Triggers, December-20l7iRequired Prior to 2366 Building Permit) o Control: Signalize with a protected southbound East Bidwell Street left-turn, westbound Alder Creek Parkway split phasing, and westbound Alder Creek Parkway right-tum overlap.U-Tums prohibited. o Southbound Approach to Alder Creek Parkway liom East Bidwell Street: One thrulane, and trryo left-tum lanes, with a 300-foot-long single lane left-turn pocket excluding tapers lbr themost easterly of the left tuming lanes. o Northbound Approach to Alder Creek Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thru lane and one shared thnr/right-turn lane with a striped 500-foot long right-turn pocket excluding tapers for the shared thru/rieht-turn lane.
COI{DITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TIIE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2
WEST OF PLACERVILLE ROAD, NORTH O['WIITTE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF SCOTT ROAD, AND SOUTII OF US HIGEWAY 50 PROJECT GN 17-307)
I'ESTING TENTATIVE
No.
Condition
19. Cont.
Resolution No. 10069Page 14 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TIIE MANGINI RANCE PEASE 2 SIIBDTYTSION PROJECT (PN 17307) WEST OF PLACER\IILLEROAD, NORTE OI'WHITEROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OFUSMGIIWAYSO
SMALL-LOT TESTING TENTATIIIE SIIBDITISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The required improvements to the
intersection of East Bidwell Street and
White Rock Road have been fully funded
by the Connector JPA are currently underconstruction. It is anticipated that the newsignal and the improvements at the intersection will be complete and
operational in the Spring of 2022. Thiscondition is therefore satisfied.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
G,I, M
Condition of Approval
o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street from Alder Creek Parkway: One right-tum lane and one left-furn lane, with a 200-foot left-tum pocket excluding tapers for the left-turn lane. o Eastbound Alder Creek Parkway Departwe: Two receiving lanes shall be provided, the second receiving lane shall be dropped after 300 feet excluding tapers. o East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a fourlane divided arterial between Alder Creek Parkway and the U.S. Highway 50 Interchange, with a 38-foot-wide median at Alder Creek Parkway that tapers back to match the existing fourlane arterial segment at the eastboundU.S. Highway 50 slip onramp. East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a hvolane divided arterial between Alder Creek Parkway and Old Ranch Way, with a 38-foot-wide raised median at Alder Creek Parkway that tapers back to match the two-lane half segment. Alder Creek Parkway between East Bidwell Street and Westwood Drive shall be constructed as a twolane divided roadway with a 38-foot-wide raised median . Frontage Improvements on Alder Creek Parkway
o Frontage improvements along the southern side ofAlder Creek Parkway including curb, gutter, sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with remainder of paving required tocomplete the roadway Section Cl as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative SubdivisionMap.
Intersection of East Bidwell Street and White Rock Road o Prior to issuance ofthe 28lst building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for either Option A or Option B below as fbllows:
o Option A:
The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project proposes to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street,{Vhite Rock Road intersection: If the proposed JPA project at this location is fully funded and construction is underway by the time the 28lstbuilding permit is issued, the project shall pay the Sacramento County TransportationDevelopment Fees, toward the JPA project.
Condition
No.
19 Cont.
Resolution No. 10069Page 15 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TIIE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 STIBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OFPLACERIIILLEROAD, NORTH OFWHITEROCKROAD, f,AST OF SCOTTROAD,AI\D SOUTH OFUSHIGHWAY50
SMALL-LOT I'ESTING TENTATIYE SLIBDIWSION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The required improvements to theintersection ofEast Bidwell Street and White Rock Road have been fully funded
by the Connector JPA are currently under
construction. It is anticipated that the newsignal and the improvements at theintersection will be complete andoperational in the Spring of2022.Thiscondition is therefore satisfied.Underground water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and public utility infrastructure
will be constructed as a part of the
Savannah Parkway extension roadway
construction to serve Village 3, Hydromodrfication Basin 19 has been includedin the Enclave Offsite improvementsplans and is required to be completedprior to the issuance ofany buildingpermits in Village 3.There are no trails being constructed inthe open space adjoining the Village 3 subdivision. The trails are being roughgraded by the Subdivider and the City will construct the trails in the future.
The owner/applicant commenced withgrading the entire Mangrni Ranch Phase 2subdivision in the Spring of 2019.Throughout the grading in the future years, excess spoils will be placed in the
future Community Park East.
ResponsibleDepartment
CD (E),
EWR, PW
FD
When
Required
G, I,M
Condition of Approval
o Option B:
Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street,4Vhite Rock Road intersection with Mangini Ranch Phase 1 improvements: If the JPA project to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell StreetiWhite Rock Road intersection is not fully funded and under construction prior toissuances ofthe 281st building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible to signalize the existing intersection with improvements described in Condition No. 127 of the ManginiRanch Phase I conditions of approval. Mangini Ranch Phase 1 improvements at this location consist of"Southbound on East Bidwell Street construct a free southbound right turn laneconsisting of 3 1 5 feet of deceleration length plus 50 feet storage length, excludingappropriate tapers and a 300 fbot receiving /acceleration lane, excluding tapers along westbound White Rock Road. Westbound on White Rock Road, construct a fiee right-turn lane consisting of 3 1 5 feet of deceleration length plus 50 feet of storage length, excludingappropriate tapers, and a 300-foot receiving lane excluding appropriate tapers alongnorthbound East Bidwell Street. o The JPA currently has more than seven million dollars programed toward relocation and signalization of the East Bidwell StreetAVhite Rock Road intersection, and is planning tobegin acquiring right-of-way during the winter of 201 8, and begin construction during the surrrmer of 20 I 9. The projected absorption Schedule for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 project estimates that the 281 dwelling units will not be constructed until sometime in the second quarter of 2020. Option A above is the preferred improvement, Option B would be a throwaway improvement.
o Utilitylnfrastructure
. The utilities shall be constructed concurrent with the roadway phasing, as deemed appropriate and necessary to support the particular phase by the City Engineer . A particular development phase may be developed into sub-phases in which the roadway and utility phasing may change. If sub-phasing is proposed, the City Engineer shall determine vr.hatroadway and utility improvements are appropriate and necessary to serve the sub-phase o Trails in Open Space r The proposed trail within Lot I open space will be graded with Village 3 r The proposed trail within Lot H open space adjacent to the school will be graded with Village 4 o Park Grading
olution Nor. 1g$gnmunity Park East will serve as a spoils site during Phase 2 grading. Grading of the park will ,e l6 of6l be completed in subsequent phases.
Condition
No,
t9
Cont.
RePat
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TI{r MANGINI RANCH PHASf, 2 SUBDIVISION PROJECT (PN 17.307) WEST OFPLACER\ILLE ROAD, NORTE OTWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OF US HIGHWAY 50 SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATT!'E SIIBDIVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The improvement plans for the roadway
improvements for Savannah Parkwayfrom the easterly boundary ofVillage 2 toGrand Prairie Road necessary to serve Village 3 have been reviewed and
approved by the City. These roadway
improvements are currently under
construction and are expected to becomplete in the Fall of 2022.The roadway improvements to WesflvoodDrive between Savannah Parkway and Old Ranch Way were included in theapproved improvement plans for Village2. These improvements commenced in the Summer of2020 and have been
completed and accepted by the City in the
Spring of 2022.
The required improvements to Old RanchWay and Alder Creek Parkway in this condition have been consfucted andaccepted by the City. These roadwayimprovements were requred as acondition ofapproval for the Village 4 & 8 subdivisions approved by the City
Council in July of2020.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
G, I,M
Condition of Approval
Development Phase 3 (Villages 5 and 6, and Lots B, F, and G)Developer shall construct the following improvements as shown on the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map & Conceptual Development Phasing Diagram unless otherwise noted; Roadways shall be constructed to the ultimate horizontal and vertical alignment unless otherwise noted. o Roads . East Bidwell Street (Savannah Parkway to the Alder Creek Parkway) o Intersection ofSavannah Parkway and East Bidwell Street including turn lanes (as shown on Attachment 1llOff-Site Infrastructure Triggers, December-2017/Required Prior to 496thBuilding Permit) o Control: Signal control with split phasing.o Southbound Approach to Savannah Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thrulane, and one left-turn lane with a 100-foot-long left-turn pocket excluding tapers for the left-turn lane. o Northbound Approach to Savannah Parkway fiom East Bidwell Street: One shared thru/righttum lane.o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street from Savannah Parkway: One right-turn lane, and one left-tum lane with a 60-foot left-turn pocket excluding tapers for the left-tum lane. o Between Old Ranch Way and the southern boundary of the project site, East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a twolane arterial on the eastern "half-segment" of its ultimateconfiguration. This twolane segment shall have a striped 2-foot-wide median south of Old Ranch Way, consistent with the California Manual on Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)Figwe 3A.-107 (CA), or similar standard. The southbound left-turn pocket shall be developed in accordance with the Highway Design Manual (HDM) Figwe 405 .24, or similarstandard. Savannah Parkway shall have a 4-foot-wide raised median. . Frontage improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section I as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
Condition
No.
20 Resolution No. 10069Page l7 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The improvement plans for the roadway
improvements for Savannah Parkwayfrom the easterly boundary ofVillage 2 toGrand Prairie Road necessary to serve Village 3 have been reviewed and
approved by the City. These roadway
improvements are currently underconstruction and are expected to becomplete in the Fall of 2022.The roadway improvements to WestwoodDrive between Savannah Parkway and Old Ranch Way were included in the
approved improvement plans for Village2. These improvements commenced in theSummer of 2020 and have beencompleted and accepted by the City in the Spring of 2022.
The required improvements to Old RanchWay and Alder Creek Parkway in this condition have been constructed andaccepted by the Cify. These roadway improvements were required as acondition ofapproval for the Village 4 & 8 subdivisions approved by the City
Council in July of 2020
Responsible
Department
cD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
Y IS.IiJ
When
Required
G, I,M
Condition of Approval
o Savannah Parkway (SMtiD Substation to Grand Prairie Road)o One lane of travel in each direction and a landscaped median of varying wtdths. o Intersection of Savannah Parkway and Grand Prairie Road including tum lanes o Northbound approach to Grand Prairie Road from Savannah Parkway: One shared tfu ough/right-hrrn/left -turn lane.
o Southbound approach to Grand Prairie Road from Savannah Parkway: One shared through/right-turn lane and one left-tum lane. The left-turn lane will have a 125- foot-long taper with 60 f'eet of vehicle storage.
. Westbound approach to Savannah Parkway from Grand Prairie Road: One shared right-turn lane and one left-turn lane.
o Frontage improvements along the northern side of Savannah Parkway including curb, gutter, sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section K as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
o Park frontage improvements are the responsibility of the City.o Westwood Drive (Alder Creek Parkway to Placerville Road) o One lane of travel in each direction with mediano Intersection of Alder Creek Parkway and Westwood Drive including turn laneso Southbound Approach to Alder Creek Parkway from Placerville Road: One shared through/right-turn lane, and one left-turn lane with a 125-foot long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.
o Intersection ofAlder CreekParkway and Placerville Road including turn laneso Southbound Approach to Placerville Road from Alder Creek Parlsvay: One rightturn lane. r Eastbound Approach to Placerville Road from Alder Creek Parkway: One shared throughfl eft -turn lane.
o Village 6 Entrance/Exit on Westwood Drive
o Control: Stop-Sign control at the Village 6 exit to Westwood Drive. Northbound Approach to Village 6 enffance liom Westwood Drive:
o One shared through/right-ttun lane. Southbound Approach to Village 6 entrance from Westwood Drive: One shared through/left-tum lane
o Frontage improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalh median, and landscaping along with olution No. 10069 remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Sections U, U-2, and V1 as shown one 18 of6l the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map FOR TIIE MANGINI RANCH PHASE 2 S{IBDTVTSION PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OT PLACER\TLLE ROAD, NORTE OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF SCOTT ROAD, AI\ID SOUTII OF US HIG}TWAY 50
CONDITIONS OF
VESTING TENT MAP
No.
Condition
20 Cont.
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MANGIM RANCE PHASE 2 SUBDI1TSION PROJECT CN T7.307) WEST OFPLACERVILLEROAD, NORTHOFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OF US EIGEWAY 50 SMALL.LOT VESTING TENTATIYtr SI]BDTIISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
These improvements to East Bidwell
Street, Alder Creek Parkway and theintersection of Placerville Road and White Rock Road in this condition are notrequired to provide access and utilities tothe Village 3 subdivision. The required improvements to Placerville Road at theintersection of White Rock Road will becompleted with future phases in the Mangrni Ranch Phase 2 subdivision
ResponsibleDepartment
CD (E),
EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
G, I,M
Condition of Approval
Alder Creek Parkway (Westwood Drive to Placerville Road) . Village 5 Entrance/Exit on Alder Creek Parkway o Control: Stop-Sign control at the Village 5 exit to Alder Creek Parkway.o Eastbound Approach to Village 5 entrance from Alder Creek Parkway: Left-turn lane with 125-foot-long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage.
o Frontage improvements along the northem side of Alder Creek Parkway including curb, gutter, sidewalk, median, and landscaping along with remainder of paving required to complete the roadway Section Cl as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map.
Intersection of Placerville Road and White Rock Road
o Prior to the 496s building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for prohibiting southbound left-hrns from Placerville Road to eastbound White Rock Road by construction of araised median on Placerville Road to channelize all southbound traffic onto westbound WhiteRock Road. o Utilifylnfrastructure
. The utilities shall be constructed concurrent with the roadway phasing, as deemed appropriate and necessary to support the particular phase by the City Engineer . A particular development phase may be developed into sub-phases in which the roadway and utility phasing may change. If sub-phasing is proposed, the City Engineer shall determine what roadwayand utility rmprovements are appropriate and necessary to serve the sub-phase o Trails in Open Space
. The proposed trail within Community Park East, including the connection with Mangini Ranch Phase 1, will be graded with Phase 3
o Park Grading
. Community Park East grading will be completed.
Condition
No.
20. Cont.
Resolution No. 10069Page 19 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
During the course ofgrading and Yes
construclion for this subdivision no mineshafts or tunnels were located or discovered.
The owner/applicant has jointlyparticipated with the adjacent propertyowner (Enclave at Folsom Ranch) for the traffic conlrol, planning and construclionof roadway improvements to East Bidwell Street, Alder Creek Parkway, Savannah
Parkway and Placerville Road. The
improvements to Alder Creek Parkway,
East Bidwell Street, Savanah Parkway,
Old Ranch Way and Westrvood Drive areexpected to be completed in the Spring of2022.
Comments
The owner/applicant obtained all Rightsof Entry, construction easements and grant deeds for all off-site improvementsprior to commencement of grading. Allrrghts-of-entry are on file with the Community Development Department.
CD (E)
cD (E)
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E)
G
G
When
Required
G
Prepare Traffic Control Plan.
Prior to construction, a Traffic Control Plan for roadways and intersections affected by construction shall beprepared. The Traffic Control Plan shall designate haul routes and comply with requirements in the encroachment permits issued by the Cify ofRancho Cordova, Sacramento County, and Caltrans and anyother local agencies, including but not limited to the City, ifapplicable. The Traffrc Control Plan to beprepared by the project construction contractor(s) shall, at minimum, include the following measures:
r Maintaining the maximum amount of travel lane capacity during non-construction periods, possible, and advanced notice to drivers through the provision bf construction signage. o Maintaining alternate one-way traffic flow past the lay down area and site access when feasible.. Heavy trucks and other construction transport vehicles shall avoid the busiest commute hows (7 a.m. to 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays).
o A minimum 72-hour advance notice ofaccess restrictions for residents, businesses, and local emergency response agencies. This shall include the identification ofaltemative routes and detours to enable for the avoidance ofthe immediate construclion zone.
. A phone number and community contact for inquiries about the schedule ofthe construction throughout the construction period. This infbrmation will be posted in a local newspaper, via the City's web site, or at CiW Hall and will be updated on a monthly basis.
Condition of Approval
Off-site improvements / Rights of Entry
For any improvements constructed on private property that are not under the ownership or control ofthe owner/applicant, all rights-of-entry, and ifnecessary, a permanent easement shall be obtained and provided tothe City. AII rights of entry, construction easements, either permanent or temporary and other easements shall be obtained as set forth in Amendments No. I and 2 to ARDA, which shall be fully executed by allaffected parties and shall be recorded with the Sacramento County Recorder, where applicable, prior to annroval of sradine and/or imorovement olans.
Mine Shaft Remediation
The owner/appllcant shall locate and remediate all antiquated mine shafts, drifts, open cuts, tunnels, and water conveyance or impoundment structures existing on the project site, with specific recommendations for the sealing, filling, or removal ofeach that meet all applicable health, safety and engineering standards.Recommendations shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed engineer or geologist. All remedial plans shall be and the to of
23 WEST OF PLACER\IILLE ROA.D, NORTII OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF SCOTT ROAD, A\ID SOUTII OF'US HIGHWAY 50 CONDITIONS OF' APPROVAL F'OR THE MANGIM RAI\CH PHASE 2 SIJ'BDTWSTON PROJf, CT (PN 17-307) SMALL.LOT I'ESTING MAP
No.
Condition
2l
22 Resolution No. 10069Page 20 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
Yes
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
The Community DeveloPmentDepartment has reviewed and approved the improvement plans for thissubdivision. The improvement plans and the required tmprovements are being
constructed in accordance with the currentCity Standards and Specifications.
Comments
The owneriapplicant has obtained all
required State and Federal permits and
copies are available from the Community
l)eve I onment Deoartment
The City and/or the Owner obtained a
Section 401 Water Quality certification
for the backbone and project specificimprovements. All required measures were implemented prior to grading and
construction in the Sorine of 20 l 9
cD (P)(E)
cD (P)(E)
CD (E)
Responsible
Department
I
G, I
G
When
Required
Standard Construction SpeciJications and Details
Public and private improvements, including roadways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle lanes and trails, streetlights, underground infrastructure and atl other mprovements shall be provided tn accordance with thelatest edition of the City ofEolsom Standard Construction Speci.fications and Details andlhe Design andProcedures Manual and Improvement Standards. l{ater Qu ality CertiJication
A wateiquality certification pursuant to Section 40 I of the Clean Water Act is required befbre issuance of the record ofdecision and before issuance ofthe Section 404 permit. Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the owner/applicant shall obtain water quality certification for the pro.lect. Anymeasures required as part ofthe issuance ofwater quality certification shall be implemented pursuant to the Landslide /Slope Failure
The owner/applicant shall retain an appropriately licensed engineer during the grading activities to identifliexisting tanOstides and potential slope failure hazards. The said engineer shall be notified a minimum of two days prior to any site clearing or grading to facilitate meetings with the grading contractor in the field Improvement Plans
The improvement plans for the required public and private subdivision improvements necessary to serve any and all phases of development shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department Yes
cD (E) PW
cD (E)
G Yes
M
to
27 26.
PLAN
The owner/applicant retained a
geotechnical engineer and implementedrecommendations for this mitigationmeasure, A geotechnical report outlining these recommendations ts on file withThe Community DevelopmentDepartment has reviewed and approved the improvement plans for this
Condition of Approval
State and Federal Permits
The owner/applicant shall obtain all required State and Federal permits and provide evidence that saidpermits have been obtained, or that the permit is not required, subject to staffreview prior to approval ofany or
28. wEsT OFPLACERVILLEROAD,NORTHOFWHITEROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTII OFUSHIGHWAYS0 OT'APPROVAL FOR THE RANCH PIIASE 2 PROJECT (PN 17-307)
TENTATIVE
No.
Condition
24. 25
Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has installed allsewer and water infrastructure within thestreet right of way or within existing public water, sewer and public utility
easements for this subdivision.
ResponsibleDepartment
I cD (E)
When
Required Condition of Approval
Water and Sewer Infrastruclure
All City-owned water and sewer infrastructure shall be placed within the street right of way. In the event that a City-maintained public water or sewer main needs to be placed in an area other than the public right of way,such as tlrough an open space corridor, landscaped area, etc., the following criteria must be met;o The owner/applicant shall provide public sewer and water main easementsr An access road shall be designed and constructed to allow for the operations, maintenance and replacement of the public water or sewer line by the City along the entke water and/or sewer line alignment.
o In no case shall a City-maintained public water or public sewer line be placed on private residential property.
. The domestic water and irrigation system owned and maintained by the City shall be separately metered per City ofF olsom Standard Construction Soecifications and Details . No.
Condition
29. Resolution No. 10069Page 22 of 61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
Yes
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
No existing improvements were existing
as part ofthis subdivision.
The owner/applicant has coordinated with
all public utilities that will provide service
to the subdivision. Bonding for the
construction of the joint trench facilities
to serve this subdivision are provided in
the subdivision improvement agreement
for this subdivision.
The owner/applicant submitted a Lrghting
Plan for all backbone roadways and
subdivisions in accordance with the
Design Guidelines and City Standards lbr
Street Lighting. A copy of the lightingplans are available from the CommunityDevelopment Department.
Comments
CD (E)
cD (PXE)
cD (P)
ResponsibleDepartment
I, OG
M
When
Required
I
Utility Coordination
The owner/applicant shall coordinate the planning, development and completion ofthis project with thevarious utility agencies (i.e., SMtlD, PG&E, etc.). The owner/applicant shall provide the Cify with written confirmation ofpublic utility service prior to approval ofall final maps.Replacin g H azar dou s F acililies The owner/applicant shall be responsible for
curb and gutter, and/or bicycle trail facilities
replacing any and all damaged or hazardous public sidewalk, along the site frontage and/or boundaries, including pre-existing and construction the satisfaction of the
Condition of Approval
Lighting Plan
Thl owner/applicant of all project phases shall submit a lighting plan for the project to the CommunityDevelopment Department. The lighting plan shall be consistent with the Folsom Ranch Central District Design Gurdelines: . Shield or screen lighting fixtures to direct the light downward and prevent light spill on adjacent properties;
o Place and shield or screen flood and area lighting needed for construction activities, nighttime sporting activities, and/or security so as not to disturb adjacent residential areas and passing motorists; . For public lighting in residential neighborhoods, prohibit the use oflight fixtures that are ofunusually high intensity or that blink or flash;
. Uie appropriate building materials (such as low-glare glass, low-glare building glaze or f,rnrsh, neutral, earthtoned colored painiand roofing materials), shielded or screened lighting, and appropriate signage inthe office/commercial areas to prevent llght and glare fiom adversely affecting motortsts on nearby roadways; and
r Design exterior on-site lighting as an integral part ofthe building and landscaping design in the Specific Plan Area. Lighting fixtures shall be architecturally consistent with the overall site design. Lights used on should be directed to I the face with no off site
31 JZ.
SMALL.LOT ATI!'E ST]BDNISION
AY
APPROVAL
IIIGHW 50
7-307)
US
I
OF
(PN
SOUTII
PROJECT
ROAD, AND
,
OF SCOTT
PIIASE
EAST
RANCH
ROCK ROAD,
THE MANGINI
OF WIIITE
['oR
ROAD, NORTH
OF
WEST oF PLACER\TLLE
No.
Condition
30 Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TIIE MANGIM RANCE PEASE 2 SI'BDIVISION PROJECT (PN 17307')
WESTOFPLACNRVILLEROAD, NORTH OFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OFUSHIGIIWAYS() SMALL.LOT I'ESTING TENTATTYE ST]BDTVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
YesYes
Yes
Comments
All utilify lines below 69 kV have been
designed to be placed underground and
Public Utility Easements have been
dedicated on the tlnal map for thissubdivision.
The Owner/applicant has completed theinfrastructure allowing for the watermeter fixed network system. Meters willbe fumished and installed during home construction for each indrvrdual meteredcormection.The improvement plans for thesubdivision improvements and backboneroadways provide vertical curbing asrequired.All Class II bike lanes have been constructed in accordance with theSpecific Plan, Design Guidelines and CityStandards and Soecifi cations.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E)
CD (E),
EWR
CD (PXB)
cD (E)(P)
When
Required
I
II
Condition of Approval
Future atility LinesAll future utility lines lower than 69 KV that are to be built within the project, shall be placed underground withinandalongtheperimeteroftheprojectatthedeveloper'scost. Theowner/applicantshalldedicateto SMUD dl necessary underground easements for the electrical facilrties that will be necessary to servicedevelopment of the protect.
Water Meter Fixed Network System
The owner owneriapplicant shall pay for, fumish and rnstall all infrastruchre associated with the water meter fixed netvrork system for any City-owned and maintained water meter within the project.
Vertical Curb
All curbs located adjacent to landscaping, whether natural or manicured, and where parking is allowed shallbe vertical.
Class II Bike Lanes
All Class II bike lanes shall be striped and the legends painted green. No parking shall be permitted withinthe Class II bike lanes.
Condition
No.
JJ.
34.35.36 Resolution No. 10069Page 24 of 6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITTONS OF A?PROVAL T'OR THE MANGIM RANCH PEASE 2 suBDrvrsroN PRoJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OFPLACERIILLE ROAD, NORTH Of,'WHTTEROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OF USHTGIIWAYSO SMALL.LOT VESTING TDM A Trl/tr' STTDNTTTTCINN MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has designed the
subdivision and sound walls along
Savannah Parkway in accordance with
these conditions. The sound walls in the
required location and height will be
constructed as part of the improvementsfor this subdivision.
Responsible
Department
cD (E)(P)
When
Required
I
Condition of Approval
Noise Barriers
Based on the Environmental Noise Assessment prepared by Bollard Acoustical Consultants on August 23, 2017,rhe following measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Community DevelopmentDepartment:
r Solid noise barrrers or similar natural features (earthen berm, etc.) shall be required to reduce future traffic noise levels to below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of 60 dB Ldn at the proposed residential backyards. Barrier heights are specified relative to backyard elevations. The following barrier heights and locations are required to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department (see Figure 2 in the August 23,2017 Assessment):
o 6-foot noise barrier at residences adjacent to Highway 50 o I 0-foot noise barrier at residences adj acent to East Bidwell Streeto 7-foot noise barrier at residences adj acent to Alder Creek Parkwayo 6-fbot noise barrier at residences adjacent to Savannah Parkway . Suitable materials for the traffic noise barriers shall include masonry and precast concrete panels. Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use. The ftnal design, materials, and colors of the barriers shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.
o Mechanical ventilation (arr conditioning) shall be provided for all residences within the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliancewith the applicable interior noise level criteria. . AII second-floor windows of residences located adjacent to East Bidwell Street from which the roadway is visible shall have a minimum STC rating of 32. Figure 2 of the Noise Assessment shows the specificlots where upgrades are required. o All second-floor windows of residences located adjacent to Alder Creek Parkway from which the roadway is visible shall have a minimum STC rating of 30. Figure 2 of the Noise Assessment shows the soecific lots where upsrades are required.
Condition
No.
37 Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CoNDITIONS Or APPROVAL rOR TEE MANGIM RANCE PHASE 2 SI'BDTVTSTON PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OFPLACERIIILLEROAD, NORTH OFWIIITEROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AI{D SOUTH OF USHIGHWAY50
SMALL-LOT I'ESTING TENTATTYE SIIBDIVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has providedupdated Master Plans for approval prior tothe issuance of a grading permit. Copies of the Master Plans are available fiom theCommunity Development Department.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD(E),
EWR, PW
When
Required
G, I
Condifion of Approval
Master Plan Updates
The Cify has approved the Folsom Plan Area Storm Drainage Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, and Water Master Plan. The owner/applicant shall submit complete updates to the approved master plans, if applicable, for the proposed changes to the master plans as a result ofthe proposed project. The updates to the master plans for the proposed project shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of grading and,/or improvement plans.The plans shall be accompanied by engineering studies supporting the sizing, location, and timing oftheproposed facilities. Improvements shall be constructed in phases as the project develops in accordance withthe approved master plans, including any necessary off-site improvements to support development ofaparticular phase or phases, subject to prior approval by the City. Off-site improvements may includeroadways to provide secondary access, water transmission lines or drstribution facilitles to provide a loopedwater system, sewer trunk mains and lift stations, water quality facilities, non-potable water pipelines and infrastructure, and drainage facilities including on or off-site detention. No changes in infiastructure from that shown on the approved master plan shall be permitted unless and until the applicable master plan has been revised and approved by the City. Final lot configurations may need to be moditred to accommodate theimprovements identified in these studies to the satisfaction of the City.The owner/applicant shall provide sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage improvements withcorresponding easements, as necessary, in accordance with these studies and the latest edition ofthe City ofFolsom Standard Construction Speci-fications and Details. andthe Design and Procedures Manual and Improvement Standards.
The storm drainage design shall provide for no net increase in run-offunder post-development conditions.
Condition
No.
38. Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OTAPPROVAL FOR THE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SI'BDTVISION PROJECT (PN 17-307)
WEST OFPLACERVILLE ROAD, NORTH OFWIIITEROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AIID SOUTH OFUS HIGHWAYS()
SMALL-LOT VESTING TENTATIVE STIBDIWSION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The Owner/Applicant is in compliancewith the Storm Water PollutionPrevention Plan (SWPPP) for the subdivision. General notes have beenincluded on the approved grading andpublic infrastructure plans to address this condition. Compliance has beenmonitored through constructioninspection.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E)
When
Required
G,I
Condition of Approval
Best Management Practices
The storm drain improvement plans shall provide for "Best Management Practices" that meet therequirements of the water quality standards of the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemPermit issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board.
In addition to compliance with City ordinances, the owner/applicant shall prepare a Stormwater PollutionPrevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Management Practices (BIVPO that comply with the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Central Valley RWQCB, to reduce water quality effects during construction. Detailed information about the SWPPP and BMPs are provided in Chapter 3A.9, "Hydrologyand Water Quality." Each proposed project development shall result in no net change to peak flows into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, or to Buffalo Creek, Carson Creek, and Coyote Creek. The owner/applicant shallestablish abaseline ofconditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow condttions shall be established for 2- , 5-, and 10O-year stom events. These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the stormwater system on the Specific Plan Area. The baseline conditions, monitoring standards, and amonitoring program shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. Water quality and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance standards, which aredescribed in Chapter 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality," are met and shall be designed as off-stream detention basins.
Discharge sites into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, as well as tributaries to Carson Creek, Coyote Creek, and Buffalo Creek, shall be monitored to ensure that pre-project conditions are being met. Corrective measures shall be implemented as necessary. The mitigation measures will be satisfied when the monitoring standards are met for 5 consecutive years without undertaking corrective measures to meet the performancestandard.
Condition
No.
39 Resolution No. 10069Page 27 of 6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CoNDITTONS OF APPROVAL FOR TrrE MANGTM RANCE PHASE 2 SITBDTyISION PROJECT CN 17-307)
WEST OF PLACERVILLEROAD, NORTHOT'WHITE ROCKROAD, EASTOF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OFUS HIGHWAYSO SMALL-LOT VESTING Tf,NTATfYE SI]BDIVTSION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
FIRE DEPT REOI,TREMENTS
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has complied with
this provision and completed periodic onsite cleaning and sweeping ofthe project site. Compliance has been monitoredthrough construction inspectionThe owner/applicant has submitted a Fuel Modification Plan (FMP) and the CityFire Department and the CommunityDevelopment Department has reviewed and approved the plan. The FMP is for allopen space areas adjacent to residential land uses adjoining the subdivision.
Responsible
Department
cD (E)
cD (P), FD
When
Required
OG
G, I"M,B
Condition of Approval
Litter Control
During Construction, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for litter control and sweeping ofall pavedsurfaces in accordance with City standards. A1l on-site storm drains shall be cleaned immediately before the commencement of the rainy season (October 15).
Prepare fuel modffication plan (FMP).
If applicable, the owner/applicant shall submit a Fuel Modification Plan consistent with the FPA Open Space Management Plan to the City for review and preliminary approval from the Fire Code Official prior to any Final and/or Parcel Map. Final approval of the plan by the Fire Code Offrcial shall occur prior to the issuanceof a permit for any new construction. A Fuel Modification Plan shall consist of a set of scaled plans showing fuel modification zones indicated with applicable assessment notes, a detailed landscape plan and aninigation plan. A fuel modification plan submitted for approval shall be prepared by one of the following: aCalifornia state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed landscape contractor, or a landscape designed, or an indrvidual with expertise acceptable to the Fire Code Official. The owner/applicant shall obtain off-siteeasements for the required for the fuel modification buffer.The owner/applicant agree to be responsible for the long-term maintenance ofthe Fuel Modification Plan.
Notification of fuel modification requirements are to be made upon sale to new property owners. Proposed changes to the approved Fuel Modification Plan shall be submitted to the Fire Code Official for approvalprior to implementation.
Condition
No.
40 41
Resolution No. 10069Page 28 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SI'BDIIISION PROJECT EN T7-307) WEST OFPLACER\TLLEROAD, NORTfl OFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OF USHIGIIWAYSO SMALL-LOT VESTING Ttr',NT A TTVtr'. SI IRTTT\rISINN MA P Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The owneriapplicant has designed andreceived approval for all weather access improvements and fire hydrants for the
entire subdivision. Building permits willnot be issued prior to these improvements being completed to the satisfaction oftheCommunity Development Department and the Fire Department.
Responsible
Departm€nt
cD (P), FD
When
Required
G,I, M, B
Condition of Approval
All-Weather Access and Fire Hydrants
The owner/applicant shall provide all-weather access and fire hydrants before combustible materials are allowed on any project site or other approved alternative method as approved by the Fire Code Official/FireChief. All-weather emergency access roads and fire hydrants (tested and flushed) shall be provided beforecombustible material or vertrcal construction is allowed on any project site or other approved alternativemethod as approved by the Fire Code Official/Fire Chief. (All-weather access is defined as six inches of compacted aggregate base from May 1 to September 30 and two inch asphalt concrete over stx inch aggregate base from October to April 30). The building shall have illuminated addresses visible from the street or drive fronting the property. Size and location of address identification shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal.
. Commercial Fire-Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinkler System: The required fire-flow for the general commercial portion of the project is determined to be 750 GPM fbr three hours. The reduced fire-flowshall not be less than 1,000 GPM for commercial buildings with automatic sprinkler systems per Section 903.1.1 of the CFC, and shall not be less than 1,500 GPM fbr commercial buildings with automaticsprinkler systems per Section 903.3.1.2 of the CFC. e Residential Fire-Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinkler System: The required fire-flow for the proposed residential portion ofthe project is determined to be 875 GPM for one hour. . All public streets shall meet City ofFolsom Street Standards unless an alternative is specifically included within this approval.
r The maximum length ofany dead end street shall not exceed 500 feet in accordance wrth the Folsom Fire Code (unless approved by the Fire Department). Several streets indicated on the plans are dead ends greater than 500 feet. In such cases, a second emergency access will be required. o All-weather emergency access roads and fire hydrants (tested and flushed) shall be provided befbre combustible material storage or vertical construction is allowed. All-weather access is defined as 6" ofcompacted AB from May I to September 30 and 2"AC over 6" AB from October I to April 30 e The first Fire Station planned for the Folsom Plan Area shall be completed and operational at the time that the threshold of 1.500 occuoied homes within the Folsom Plan Area is met.
Condition
No.
42. Resolution No. 10069Page 29 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FORTEE MANGIMRANCH PEASE 2 SUBDTVISTON PROJECT IPN 17-307) WEST OF'PLACERVTLLE ROAD, NORTH OFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OF USHIGIIIVAYsO SMALL.LOT TESTING TENTATIVE STIBDIVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Conditionwill be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of abuildingpermit in the
subdivision.
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant will submit thelandscape and inigation plans for this subdivision and the Community
Development Department will review and
approve the landscape and irrigation plansprior to issuance ofthe first buildingpermit in the subdivision. The landscape and irrigation improvements are bonded
for in the subdivision improvementagreement. In accordance with longestablished City policy, the landscape andirrigation improvements for thesubdivision are required to be completeprior to the first certificate ofoccupancy in the subdivision. The long establishedCity policy related to building permitsand landscape and irrigation issuance and timing is contrary to this condition.
However, the Community DevelopmentDepartment will verifu compliance withthe lone established Ciw policv.Landscaping and inigation plans for theVillage 3 subdivision frontage on Savannah Parkway and are bonded for the
subdivision improvement agreement for
Village 3.
Responsible
Department
cD(P), PWcD (P). Pw
When
Required
B,M
I, OG
Condition of Approval
Landscaping Plans
Final landscape plans and specifications shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and approvedby the City prior to the approval of the first building permit or the Small Lot Final Map, whichever occurs tirst. Said plans shall include all on-site landscape specifications and details, and shall comply with all State and local rules, regulations, Govemor's declarations and restrictions pertaining to water conservation andoutdoor landscaping.
Landscaping shall meet shade requirements as outlined in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan where applicable. The landscape plans shall comply and implement water efficient requirements as adopted by theState of Califbrnia (Assembly Bill I 881) (State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance) until such time the City of Folsom adopts its own Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance at which time the owner/applicant shall comply with any new ordinance. Shade and ornamental trees shall be maintained according to the most current American National Standards for Tree Care Operations (ANSI 4-300) by qualified tree care professionals. Tree topping for height reduction, view protection, light clearance or any other purpose shallnot be allowed. Specialty-style pruning, such as pollarding, shall be specified within the approved landscape plans and shall be implemented during a 5-year establishment and training period. Landscaping installed inopen spaces located between tiers of lots shall be chosen for resistance to fire and limited fuel production.
Furthermore, the owner/applicant shall comply with city-wide landscape rules or regulations on water usage.
Owner/applicant shall comply wrth any state or local rules and regulations relating to landscape water usageand landscaping requirements necessitated to mitigate for drought conditions on all landscaping in the Maneini Ranch Phase 2 proiect.Right of Way LandscapingLandscaping along all road rights ofway and in public open space lots shall be installed when the adjoining road or lots are constructed.
Condition
No.
43 44
Resolution No. 10069Page 30 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
Condition
Satisfied?
The required subdivision improvement Yes
agreement is included as part of the Citystaffreport accompanying the final mapfor City Council approval. The resolutionapproving the final map tbr thissubdivision includes a statementauthorizing the City Manager to execute the subdivision improvement agreement
for the subdivision along with approval of
theThe owner/applicant has executed an
Inclusionary Housing Agreement with theCity. The agreement allows theowner/applicant to provide an inlieu fee assigned to each building permit in the
subdivision. The inlieu housing fee will
be pard at the time of building permitissuance.
Comments
cD (E)
cD (PXE)
ResponsibleDepartment
M
When
Required
M
The Final Inclusionary Housing Plan
The Final Inclusionary Housing Plan shall be approved by the City Council, and the Inclusionary HousingAgreement approved by the City Attomey shall be executed prior to recordation of the first Small-Lot Final Map for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Subdivision.
Condition of Approval
Su bdivision Improvement Agreement
Prior to the approval of any Final Map, the owner/applicant shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with the City, identifuing all required improvements, if any, to be constructed with each proposed phase ofdevelopment. The owner/applicant shall provide security acceptable to the City, guaranteeing construction of the improvements.
46 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEE MANGIM RANCII PHASE 2 SIJBDTVISION WEST OFPLACERVILLE ROAD, NORTHOFWIIITEROCK ROAD, EAST OT'SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTII OFUSHIGHWAYs() (PN 17-307)
SMALL-LOT }'ESTING TENTATIVE
No.
Condition
MAP
45 Resolution No. 10069Page 3l of61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has provided copiesof their proposed CC&R's, which containprovisions in accordance with Items #1-5 listed in this condition ofapproval. The
Community Development Department has
reviewed and approved the C.C. & R.'s
and verified that they include the requireddisclosures.
Responsible
Department
CD (P) PK
When
Required
M
Condition of Approval
Department of Real Estate Public Report
The owner/applicant shall disclose to the homebuyers in the Department of Real Estate Public Report 1 ) Futwe public parks and public schools are located in relatively close proximity to the proposed subdivision, and that the public parks may include facilities (basketball courts, a baseball field,softball fields, soccer fields, and playground equipment) that may generate noise impacts during various times, including but not limited to evening and nighttime hours. The owneriapplicant shall also drsclose that the existing public parks include nighttime sports lighting that may generate lighting impacts during evening and nighttime hours.
2) The soil in the subdivision may contain naturally occurring asbestos and naturally occurring arsenic. 3) The collecting, digging, or removal of any stone, artifact, or other prehistoric or historic object located in public or open space areas, and the disturbance ofany archaeological site or historic property, is prohibited.
4) The project site is located within close proximity to the Mather Airport flight path and that overflight noise may be present at varlous times.
5) That all properties located within one mile of an on- or off-site area zoned or used for agricultural use (including livestock grazing) shall be accompanied by written disclosure from the transferor, in a form approved by the City ofFolsom, advising any transferee ofthe potential adverse odor impactsfrom surrounding agricultwal operations which disclosure shall direct the transferee to contact theCounty of Sacramento concerning any such property within the County zoned for agricultural uses within one mile of the subject property being transferred.
Condition
No.
47 WEST OFPLACER\ZILLEROAD, NORTH OFWHITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTE OF USETGHWAVsO CONDITIONS OF THE MANGIM RANCE PHASE PROJECT (PN 17-307) !'ESTING TENTATIVE
Resolution No. 1 0069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL T'OR TIIE MANGTM RANCH PHASE 2 SIJBDTVISION PROJECT (PN 17-307) WEST OF PLACER\,'ILLf, ROAD, NORTH OF WIIITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF SCOTT ROAD, AND SOUTH OF'US IIIGIIWAY 50 SMALL.LOT VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDTVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has dedicated a I 2.5'PUE along backbone roadway utility conidors as well as internal streets withln
the subdivision.
There is no phasing proposed for theVillage 3 final map.
The owner/applicant (or its prevtousowner) provided all necessary publicutility easements, grant deeds, offers of dedication or lemporary constructioneasements required to build all oftherequired Backbone Infrastructure neededto serve the subdivision. These wererecorded with Sacramento CountyRecorder within the Large Lot Final Map or bv senarate instrument.The owner/applicant has installed newbenchmark per the direction of the CityEngineer. The required benchmarks are in place and currently in use.The Final Map includes an easement thatallows for the construction andmaintenance of centralized mail deliveryboxes.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (E)
cD (E)CD (E)
cD (E)
cD (E)
When
Required
M
M
M
MM
Condition of Approval
Public Utility E as ements
The owner/applicant shall dedicate public utility easements for underground facilities on properties adjacent to the streets. A minimum of twelve and one-half-foot (12 5') wide Public Utifify Easements for underground facilities (i.e., SMUD, Pacific Gas and Electric, cable television, telephone) shall be dedicated adjacent to all public street rights-of-way. The owner/applicant shall dedicate additional width toaccommodate extraordinary facilities as determined by the City. The width of the public utility easementsadiacent to public rieht ofway may be reduced with prior approval from public utilify companies.Final Map Phasing Should multiple Final Maps be filed by the owneriapplicant, the phasing of maps shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.
B ack b o n e I nfr astru ctu r e
As provided for in the ARDA and the Amendment No. I thereto, the owner/applicant shall provide fully executed grant deeds, legal descriptions, and plats fbr all necessary Backbone Infrastructure to serve theprojeet, including but not limited to lands, public rights of way, public utility easements, public water maineasements, public sewer easements, irrevocable offers of dedication and temporary construction easements.All required easements as listed necessary for the Backbone Infrastructure shall be reviewed and approved bythe City and recorded with the Sacramento County Recorder pursuant to the timing requirements set forth in Section 3.8 of the ARDA, and any amendments thereto.
New Permanent Benchmarks
The owner/applicant shall provide and establish new permanent benchmarks on the (NAVD 88) datum invarious locations within the subdivision or at any other locations in the vicinity ofthe off-site Backbone Infrastructure as directed by the City Engineer. The type and specifications for the permanent benchmarksshall be provided by the City The new benchmarks shall be placed by the owner/applicant within 6 monthsfrom the date ofaooroval ofthe vestins tentative subdivision map.
Centralized Mail Delivery Units
All Final Maps shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. The owner/applicant shall provide a concrete base for the placement of any centralized maildeliveryunit. Specificationsandlocationofsuchbaseshallbedeterminedpursuanttotheapplicable requirements of the U. S. Postal Service and the City of Folsom Community Development Depaftment, with due consideration for street lieht location. traffic safetv. securitv. and consumer convenience.
Condition
No.
48 49
50 51
52 Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance ofa
building
permit.
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of a
building
Condition
Satisfied?
The Community DeveloPmentDepartrnent will require the copies of the recorded final map to be submitted to theFolsom-Cordova Unified School District prior to approval ofthe first building
permit in the subdivision.This will be satisfied at the issuance of first
Comments
The Community DeveloPmentDepartment will require the copies of the recorded final map to be submitted prior
to approval of the trrst building permit inthe subdivision. cD (P),
FCUSD
Responsible
Department
cD (E)
B
When
Required
B
Recorded Final MaP
prior to issuance of -building permits, the owner/applicant shall provide the Folsom-Cordova Unified SchoolDistrict with a copy of the recorded Final Map Recorded Final Map
prior to the issuance ofbuilding permits, the owner/applicant shall provide a digital copy ofthe recordedFinal Map (in AutoCAD formatfto the Community Development Department. Thercxception to this ..qui..-"ni are model homes; subject to approval of the Community Development Department, buildingpermits for model homes only may be issued prior to recording of the Final Map' Condition of Approval
54. HIGHWAY 50
-307)
US
t7
SOUTfl OF
PROJECT
ROAD, AND"
2 SUBDIYTSION
OF SCOTT
PEASE
EAST
TIYE
RANCH
ROCK ROAD,
TEE MANGINI
OF WHITE
AL FOR
NORTH
APPROV
ROAD,
CONDITIONS otr'
WEST OF PLACERVILLE
Condition
No.
53 Resolution No. 10069Page 34 of 61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
Satisfied?
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance ofa
buildingpermit.
Comments
The owner/applicant has not submitted a
Design Review application at this time.
The Planning Commission will evaluate a
future application for conformance with
the Folsom Ranch Central Dishict
Guidelines. The Community
Development Department will present the
Design Review approval for residentialunits in this subdivision to the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a
building permit.
ResponsibleDepartment
cD (P)
When
Required
Design Review Approval B
Prior to issuance ofa building permit for any residential units within the subdivision, the owner/applicant shall obtain Design Review and/or Planned Development approval from the Planning Commission for all residences to be built within the subdivision. Ifthe architecture is not consistent with the Folsom Ranch Central District Design Guidelines, the owner applicant may modifu the plans or apply for a modilication to the Design Guidelines to be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
Condition of Approval No. Condition
55. Resolutron No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CONDITIONS OF A}PROVAL FOR TEE MANGIM RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDII1SION PROJECT (PN 17-307)
WEST OFPLACERITLLE ROAD, NORTE OFWEITE ROCKROAD, EAST OF SCOTTROAD,AND SOUTH OT USHIGHVYAYSO SMALL-LOT }TESTING TENTATWE SUBDTVISION MAP
Condition
Satisfied?
TRAFFIC. ACCESS. CIRCL'LATION. AND PARKING REOUIREMENTS Yes
Comments
The owner/applicant has constructed therequired intersection improvements andthe City has formally accepted theseimprovements in the Spring of 2022. Therequired improvements were included oneither the approved Enclave at FolsomRanch Off-Site Improvement Plans or the approved Village 2 Improvement Plans.
Responsible
Department
cD (E)
When
Required Condition of Approval
East Bidwell StreeVSavannah ParkwayPrior to issuance ofthe first building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for configuring the East Bidwell StreeVSavannah Parkway Intersection as follows:
o Southbound Approach to Savarurah Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thrulane, and one left-tum lane with a 200-foot long transition, 60-foot-long taper, and 100 feet ofvehicle storage. o Northbound Approach to Savannah Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One shared thnr/right-turn lane. o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street from Savannah Parkway: One shared left/right-turn lane, and a striped out left-turn pocket with a 125-foot-long taper and 60 feet ofvehicle storage. o Control: Stop-Sign control at the westbound approach to East Bidwell Street from Savannah Parkway with full access.
o Between Old Ranch Way and the southern boundary of the project site, East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a twolane arterial on the eastern "half segment" of its ultimate configuration. This tvvolane segment shall have a striped 2-foot-wide median south of Old Ranch Way, consistent with theCalifornia Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (I4UTCD) Figure 34-107 (CA), or similarstandard. The southbound left-tum pocket shall be developed in accordance with the Highway Design Manual (HDM) Fisure 405-24. or similar standard. Savannah Parkwav shall have a raised median curb.
Condition
No.
56. Resolution No. 10069Page 36 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
will be
satisfiedprior to
issuance of
the 236th
buildingpermit rn theMangini
Ranch Phase
2subdivision.
The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approvedthe traffic signal plans for the proposed signal at the intersection of East BidwellSfieet and Alder Creek Parkway. The traffic signal is expected to be complete
and operational in the Spring of2022.The Community Development Department is monitoring building permit
issuance in the Mangini Ranch Phase 2development to verifu completion of thesignal prior to issuance ofthe 2366 building permit.
B cD (E)
East Bidwell StreeVAlder Creek ParkwayPrior to issuance ofthe 236ft building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for expanding and signalizing the East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway Intersection as follows:
o , Southbound Approach to Alder Creek Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thrulane, and two lefttum lanes, with a 30O-foot-long single lane left-turn pocket excluding tapers for the most easterly ofthe left turning lanes.
o Northbound Approach to Alder Creek Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thru lane and one shared thn/right-tum lane with a striped 500-foot long right-tum pocket excluding tapers for the sharedthru/right-turn lane. o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street from Alder Creek Parkway: One right-tum lane and one left-tum lane, with a 200-foot left-tum pocket excluding tapers for the left-turn lane. o Eastbound Alder Creek Parkway Departure: Two receiving lanes shall be provided, the second receiving lane shall be dropped after 300 feet excluding tapers.
o Control: Signalize with a protected southbound East Bidwell Street left-tum, westbound Alder Creek Parkway split phasing, and westbound Alder Creek Parkway right-turn overlap. U-Tums prohibited. o East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a four-lane divided arterial between Alder Creek Parkway and the U.S. Highway 50 Interchange, with a 38-foot-wide median at Alder Creek Parkway that tapers backto match the existing fourlane arterial segment at the eastbound U.S. Highway 50 slip onramp. East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a fwo-lane divided arterial between Alder Creek Parkway and OldRanch Way, with a 38-foot-wide raised median at Alder Creek Parkway that tapers back to match the two-lane half segment described in the East Bidwell StreeVSavannah Parkway Condition No. 57 above.
Alder Creek Parkway between East Bidwell Street and Westwood Drive shall be constructed as a twolane divided roadway with a 38-foot-wide raised median. 57 Resolution No. 10069Page 37 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
The required improvements to the Yes
intersection ofEast Bidwell Street and
White Rock Road have been fully fundedby the Connector JPA are currently under construction. It is anticipated that the newsignal and the improvements at theintersection will be complete andoperational in the Spring of2022. Thts condition is therefore satisfied.
B cD (E)
East Bidwell StreetAVhite Rock RoadPrior to issuance ofthe 28lst building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for either Option A or Option B below as follows:
o Option A:
The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project proposes to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell StreetAVhite Rock Road intersection: Ifthe pioposed JPA project at this location is firlly fimded and construction is underway by the time the 28lst building permit is issued the project shall pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fees, toward the JPA project. o Option B:
Signalize the existing East Bidwell StreeVWhite Rock Road intersection with Mangini Ranch Phase Iimprovements: If the JPA project to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell StreetMhite Rock Roadintersection is not fully frrnded and under construction prior to issuances ofthe 28lst building permit, theowner/applicant shall be responsible to signalize the existing intersection with improvements describedin Condition No. 127 of the Mangini Ranch Phase I conditions of approval. Mangini Ranch Phase I improvements at this location consist of"Southbound on East Bidwell Street construct a free southbound right turn lane consisting of 3 I 5 feet of deceleration length plus 50 feet storage length, excluding appropriate tapers and a 300 foot receiving /acceleration lane, excluding tapers along westbound White Rock Road. Westbound on White Rock Road, construct a free right-turn lane consisting of 315 feet of deceleration length plus 50 feet ofstorage length, excluding appropriate tapers, and a 300 foot receivinglane excluding appropriate tapers along northbound East Bidwell Sneet. o The JPA currently has more than seven million dollars programed toward relocation and signalization of the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection, and is planning to begin acquiring right-of-way during the winter of2018, and begin construction during the summer of20l9. The projected absorption Schedule for the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 project estimales that the 281 dwelling units will not be constructed until sometime in the second qurter of 2020. Option A above is the preferred improvement, Option B would be a throwaway improvement.
58. Resolution No. 10069Page 38 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance ofthe 496ftbuildingpermit in theMangini
Ranch Phase
2subdivision.Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
the 4966building
permit in the
Mangini
Ranch Phase
2subdivision.
This condition is not a requirement of thisVillage 3 subdivision since this subdivision will only increase the numberof mapped lots to 422 inthe ManginiRanch Phase 2 subdivision which isbelow the requirement to complete the improvement prior to issuance of the4966 building permit.
This condition is not arequirement of thisVillage 3 subdivision since this subdivision will only increase the number
of mapped lotsto 422 in the ManginiRanch Phase 2 subdivision which isbelow the requirement to complete the improvement prior to issuance of the4966 building permit. cD (E)
CD (E)
B
B
White Rock RoadlPlacerville RoadPrior to the 496s building permit, the owner/applicant shall be responsible for prohibiting southbound lefttums from Placerville Road to eastbound White Rock Road by construction of a raised median on PlacervilleRoad to channelize all southbound traffic onto westbound White Rock Road.
East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkwav
Prior to issuance of the 496m building permit and concwrent with implementation of Condition 64 above, the owner/applicant shall signalize the East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway intersection as follows:
o Southbound Approach to Savannah Parkway from East Bidwell Street: One thru-lane, and one left-tum lane with a l0O-foot-long left-tum pocket excluding tapers for the left-tum lane. o NorthboundApproachto SavannahParkway fromEastBidwell Street: One sharedthnr/right-tumlane.o Westbound Approach to East Bidwell Street from Savannah Parkway: One right-tum lane, and one lefttum lane with a 60-foot left-turn pocket excluding tapers for the left-tum lane. o Control: Signal control with split phasingo Between Old Ranch Way and the southem boundary of the project site, East Bidwell Street shall be constructed as a two-lane arterial on the eastern "half-segment" of its ultimate configuration. This twolane segment shall have a striped 2-foot-wide median south of Old Ranch Way, consistent with theCalifomiaManual on Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Figure 3.A-107 (CA), or similar standard. Thesouthbound left-turn pocket shall be developed in accordance with the Highway Design Manual (HD\,f) Figure 405.24, or similar standard. Savannah Pmkway shall have a 4-foot-wide raised median. 59 60.
Resolution No. 10069Page 39 of61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
ARCHITECTURE/SITE DESIGN REQIIIREMENTS
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance ofa
buildingpermit.
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance ofa
buildingoermit.
The owner/applicant has entered into a
SPIF Credit/Reimbursement Agreements
with the City for eligible improvements
constructed by the owner/applicant.
The Community DevelopmentDepartment will review all fuhreresidential site plans in the subdivision toveriff compliance with this condition.
The Community Development
Departrnent will review all future
residential site plans in the subdivision to
verifu compliance with this condition.
cD (E)
cD (P) (E)
cD (P) (E)
M
B
B
C r edit Reimbars ement Ag r eement
Prior to the recordation of the first Small-Lot Final Map, the owner/applicant and City shall enter rnto a credit and reimbursement agreement for constructed improvements that are included in the Folsom Plan Area's Public Facilities Financing Plan.Landscaping Plan
Owner/applicant shall submit a landscape plan for all areas (by phase or subdivision) ofthe project whereowner/applicant proposes to install landscaping on residential lots. Jhe landscape plan shall take into account the then existing state or local nrles and regulations related to landscape water usage and water wise landscape principles. The landscape plans shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a building permit in the phase or subdivision. The owner/applicant shall comply with any state or local ru1es and regulations relating to landscape water usage and landscaping requirements necessitated to mitigate for drought conditions.
Mech anical E quip ment S cr eenin g
All mechanical equipment shall be concealed from view ofpublic streets, neighboring properties and nearbyhigher buildings where practicable to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. 6l62.
63 Resolution No. 10069Page 40 of6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
The Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Grading Yes
Plans approved by the City reflect themodifications to the trail system as shown in trail system modification exhibit dated
December 15,2017 . The trail system
modifications are adjoining futurevillages in the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 subdivision.
Bicy I cD (P) cle Trail System ModiJications
The owner/applicant shall incorporate the design and grading for the proposed Class I bike trails located within Lot H into the improvement plans consistent with the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Proposed Trail SystemModification Exhibit dated December 15, 2017. 64 Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
CITY CORPORATION YARD
The City has completed the annexation Yesprocess with LA-FCO to add the future corporation site to the City ofFolsom
Limits. The grant deed for the transfer ofthe Corporation Yard to the City hasrecorded in the Official Records of Sacramento County and LAFCO has
recorded the Certificate of Completion inBook 201 8 1207 at P age 0779 in the Official Records of Sacramento Countycompleting the arnexation process.
M,B CD (P)
The location tentatively identified for acquisition by the City for the City's new Corporation Yard in Secfion2.2.3.4 of the First Amended and Restated Tier I Development Agreement (ARDA) between the City and theproject developer may not be feasible for use as a Corporation Yard due to challenges in obtaining Countyentitlements and utility services. Subject to the application ofthis condition to other ParticipatingLandowners (as defined in the ARDA) as provided herein, the followin! condition is added with respect toresolution ofthe location ofthe corporation yard:Prior to approval of the First Final Small Lot Map in the FPA (or frst building permit if development may occur without any subdivision), a site consistent with the requirements of Section 2.2.3.4 of the ARDA, as may be amended or as otherwise agreed to between the City and the Participating Landowners, shall be identified as acceptable to the City as suitable and feasible for use as the new Corporation Yard, with accessto sewer, water and all required utility services. The City's determination of feasibility may include the identification of an altemative site consistent with the forgoing, as a back-up for the primary site, as well asan evaluation of the time, cost and likelihood of obtalning any necessary entitlements or other govemmentalapprovals for use ofthe land as a corporation yard, with the final determination offeasibility subject to thesole and reasonable discretion ofthe City Council.The City intends to impose this condition equitably throughout the Plan Area as and to each and every Participating Landowner who seeks any future specific plan amendment, tentative subdivision map or ARDA amendment in connection with its proposed development. If the Cify fails to impose such a condition, when required, with at least substantially similar terms, although precise language may difler (whether through atentative subdivision map condition of approval, amendment to the specific plan or to a development agreement, or other agreement between the City and a Participating Landowner), this condition ofapprovalshall be null and void as to Owner/Applicant's Project, and shall not be used as a reason to prevent approval of any final small lot map for Ouner/Applicant's Project. If the City approves any other final small lot map for a project within the Plan Area and the Corporation Yard site has not been approved as provided for herein, Owner/Applicant may seek relief from the terms of this condition by appeal to the City Manager, withthe right to review by the City Council. 65 Resolution No. 10069Page 42 of61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
SCHOOL SITES
Yes
The City, the Folsom Cordova Unified
School District (FCUSD) and the
Landowners in the Folsom Plan Area
successfirlly negotiated the proposedlocations of the combined middleschool/high school site. The City Manager informed the Landowners that
this condition of approval has been
satisfied with a letter dated June 12,2018The letter is on file with the City. cD (P)
Folsom
Cordova
Unified
School
District
M,B
The locations school sites and the combined middle school/high school were initiallyestablished during the City's processing and approval of the Folsom Specific Plan, at which time all PlanAreaparticipantswereengagedinthereviewoflandplanningandlanduses. In2015,theFolsomCordovaUnified School District raised concerns that the planned location ofthe future combined middle school/high school site may not be preferred.
Prior to approval of First Final Small Lot Map in the FPA (or first building permit if development may occurwithout any subdivision), the site(s) for the futwe high school and middle school in the Folsom Plan Areawill be identified and approved by the City, in consultation with the Folsom Cordova Unitied School District.
The City intends to impose this condition equitably throughout the Plan Area as and to each and everyParticipating Landowner who seeks any future specific plan amendment, tentative subdivision map or ARDA amendment in connection with its proposed development. If the City fails to impose such a condition, when required, with at least substantially similar terms, although precise language may differ (whether through atentative subdivision map condition of approval, amendment to the specific plan or to a development agreement, or other agreement between the City and a Participating Landowner), this condition ofapprovalshall be null and void as to Olrmer/Applicant's Project, and shall not be used as a reason to prevent approvalof any final small lot map for Owner/Applicant's Project. If the City approves any other final small lot map for a project within the Plan Area and the high school and middle school site(s) has not been approved as provided for herein, Owner/Applicant may seek relief from the terms of this condition by appeal to the CityManager, with the right to review by the City Council.
If Owner/Applicant proposes final maps in phases, Owner/Applicant may apply to the City Manager topermit individual phases to move forward to final map if substantial progress is being made to identifu an acceptable site(s) as described above. The City Manager's determination ofsubstantial progress shall be in his/her sole discretion.
66. Resolution No. 10069Page 43 of 6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Mitigation Measures
20 I 5).
Table l.
FPASP EIWEIS, as amended by the WE SPA Addendum, Mitigation Measures Applicable to the Mangini Ranch Phase 2 Tentative Subdivision Map Project.* *The MMRP for the WE SPA Addendum to the FPASP EIRTEIS is included as Attachment 20.
Condition
Satisfied?
Aesthetics
YesYesYes
Air Oualitv
YesYes
YesYesYes
Comments
This subdivision does not have frontage onUS H!\ry 50The construction staging area does notrequire screening due to distance fromexistins residences (>1000 feet)CDD has approved the lighting plan forthis subdivision (2) The Cify and its EnvironmentalCompliance Consultant (Helix) havereviewed all MMRP conditions and verified compliance with this MitigationMeasure. Compliance was verified prior to commencement of grading andconstruction in Spring of 2022.Compliance table is on file with the Citv.
See (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) above. No off-site elements outside the Citv limits required for this subdivisron
See (2) above. No off-site elements outside
the City limits required for this subdivision
Responsible
Aqencv
CD
CD (PXEXB)
CD (P)
CD
cD (PXE)
SMAOMD
cD (EXP)
SMAQMD
Sacramento
County
El Dorado
County
or
Cal Trans
Timing
G,O
G
B
G,C
G,C
GGG
Mitigation Measures Applicable to the Project
3A..1-l : Construct and Maintain a Landscape Conidor Adjacent to U.S. 50.3.{. l -4: Screen Construction Staging Areas 3A,.l-5: Establish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and Implement a Lighting Plan. 3A.2-la.Implement Measures to Control Air Pollutant Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements. 3A.2-1b: Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction of On-SiteElements. 3A.2-lc: Analyze and Disclose Projected PMl0 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resulting from Construction of On-Site Elements.3A.2-ld: Implement SIUAQMD's Basic Construction Emission Control Practices during Construction of all Off-site Elements located in Sacramento Countv
3A.2-lf: Implement SI\4AQMD'S Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices during Construction of all Off-site Elements. 67 Condition
67-1
67-267-367-4
67-5
67-667-7
67-8
Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
YesYesYes
YesYes
34.2-6: Measures to Control Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Odorous Emissions B,C CD See (2) above Yes 67-15 I, OG PW See (2) above Yes 67-16 3A.3-1a (as amended by WE SPA): Mitigation for erosion impacts.
YesYes
Yes
YesYes
YesYesYes
YesYesYes
See (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) above See (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) ahoveSee (2) aboveSee (2) above SMAQMD
CD
CDCD
SMAOMI)
CD
CD
IISACE
CD
CDFW
cD (PXE)
CDFW
CD
cD (PXE)
CDFW
CD
CDFW
cD (PXE)
CDFW
cD (PXE)
CDFW
CD
USFWS
CD
IISFWS
G
G
M, I
G,C
G,CG,C
G, I, OG
G, I,C
G
GIC
GGG
G
G, I, OGG. I. OG
3A.2-lg Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction of Off-site Elements.3A.2-1h: Analyze and Disclose Pdected PM10 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resultingfrom Construction of Off-site Elements
34.2-2: Implement All Measures Prescribed by the Air Quality Mitigation Plan to Reduce Operational Air Pollutant Emissions
3A.2-4a. Develop and Implement a Plan to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Construction-Generated Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions.
3A.2-4b: Implement Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants.
3A.2-5: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implementan Asbestos Dust Control Plan. 3A.3-lb (as amended by WE SPA): Implement Clean Water Act Section 404 Permits and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications.
3A.3-2a (as amended by WE SPA): Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson's Hawk and Other Raptor Nests WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-4: Conduct preconstruction Swainson's Hawk and other raptor surveys 7A 3-2h Prenare and Imnlement a Swainson's Hawk Mitisation Plan.
WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-5: Prepare and Implement Swainson's hawk mitigation plan. 3A.3-2c (as amended by WE SPA): Conduct preconstruction Tricolored Blackbird Nesting surveys.
WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-6: Conducting preconstruction burrowing owl survey WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-7: Preconstruction nesting bird survey 3A.3-2d (as amended bv WE SPA): Conduct Dreconstruction bat roosting surveY 3A.3-2e: Obtain an Incidental Take Permit under Section 10(a) of ESA; Develop and Implement a Habitat Conseruation PIan to Comnensate for the Loss of Vemal Pool Habitat. 3A.3-2f: and a Habilat Conservation
67-9
67-10
67-11
67-12
67-13
67-1.4
67-17
67-18
67-t9
67-2067-2167-2267-2367-24
67-2567-2667-27
Resolution No. 10069
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
Yes
CD See (2) above Yes 57-36 WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-3: Conduct preconstruction western pond turtle survey G CDFW M,B,C CD See (2) above Yes 67-37 3A.4-1: Implement Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions Yes
3A.4-2b: Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community Forestry Program and./or Off-Site Tree Program to CD No trees are present in the subdivision. Yes 67-39 of On-Site Trees. M,B Resources
CD See (2) above Yes 67-40 3A.5-1a (as amended by WE SPA): Comply with the Programmatic Agreement. G YesYes
See (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) aboveSee (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) aboveSee (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) above
See (2) above
USACE
CT)
USACE
CD
USACE
USFWS
CD
USFWS
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CD
CDFW
CD
CD. PW
CD
cD (E) (P)
CDFW
CD
SMAOMD
CD
USACE
CD
USACE
G, I,C
G, I, OG
G, I,B
G, I,CG, I,BG, I,C
G,C
G
M,B
G
G.C
Plan to Compensate for the Loss of VELB Habitat.
3A.3-2g. Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates and Implement All Permit Conditions
3A.3-2h (as amended by WE SPA): Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle avoidance and mrnimization measures 3A.3-3: Conduct Special-stahrs Plant Surveys, Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or CompensatoryMitigation. 3A.3-4a (as amended by W,/E SPA): Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement.3A.3-4b (as amended by WE SPA): Valley Needlegrass Grassland Avoidance and Minimization Measures. w/E Oak woodlands
WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-l: Conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees.WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.4-2: Conduct preconstruction westem spadefoot survey 3A.4-2a: Implement Additional Msasures to Reduce Operational GHG Emissions. 3A.5-1b (as amended by WE SPA): Perform an InventoryRegister of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or
Destruction Cannot be Avoided.
3A.5-2 (as amended byRequired, Stop Work if
WE SPA): Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
67-28
67-29
67-30
67 -31
67-32
67-33
67-34
67-35
67-38
67-41
67-42
Resolution No. 10069Page 46 of61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
67-43 34.5-3 (as amended by WE SPA): Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures. OG cD (PXE)
Sacramento
County
Coroner
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
See (2) above. No human remains havebeen encountered in the subdivision duringgrading and construction.
Yes
Resources
has provided Yes
67-44 3A.7-1a: Prepare Site-specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate B cD (E) Geotechnical Report to the City. The Geotechnical report for the subdivision is Recommendations. on file with the
YesYes
Condition
will be
satisfied prior
to building
permit
issuance.
See (2) above. No human remains or
paleontological resources have beenencountered in the subdivision during Yes
57-48 3A.7-10: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work ifPaleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required. C CD and 3A.8-2: Complete Investigations to Extent to Which Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been See (2) above. No and/or Yes 67-49 Contaminated in Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments and Implement Required G,C CD contaminated soil or groundwater has been discovered in the subdivision.
Yes
Compliance monitored through
constnrctron rnsnectlon.Compliance monitored throughconstruction insoection.
CDD will review all future buildingpermits in the subdivision to verifrcompliance wtth mitigation measure The owner/applicant has retained ablasting contractor, BTI, Inc., to conductall blasting in the subdivision. A Blasting Safety Plan was provided to the City and
the contractor has been issued a blasting
permit for the subdivision. BTI, Inc.notifies the City prior to all blasts inaccordance with the Blasting Permitrequirements.
CD (PXEXB)
cD (E)
cD (BXP)
CD
B
G
B
M
3A.7-1b: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities 3A.7-3: Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan. 3,4.7-5. Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations. 3A.8-5: Prepare and Implement a Blasting Safety Plan in Consultation with a Qualified Blaster 67-45
67-46
67-47
67-50
Resolution No. 10069Page 47 of 6l
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Yes
A Vector Control Plan was and
67-52 3A.8-7. Prepare and Implement a Vector Control Plan in Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector G CD
SacramentoYolo Mosquito
and Vector
Control
District
submitted to the City for review andapproval. The plan incorporated variousBest Management Practices in consultationwith the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito andVector Control District. A copy of the Vector Contol Plan is available from the
Yes Control District.
and Water
Owner/applicant been issued aWDID Yes
67-53 34..9-1: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. G,C cD (E) CVRWQB # and has submitted a SWPPP approved by the SW?PP iS Yes
Yes
Yes
There are no existing overhead power lines
within or adjoining the subdivision
The City has reviewed and approved the
storm drain plans for this subdivision. Thestorm drain improvements are incompliance with the approved Folsom Plan Storm Drain Master Plan approved by theCitv.
Owner/applicant has been issued a WDID
# and has submitted a SWPPP approved by
the RWOCB. SWPPP is on file atthe CiE.
There are no existing dams upstream fromthis subdivision.
CD
Folsom
Cordova
Unified School
District
cD (E)
cD (E), PW
PW
M
G,B
G,C
M, I
Mitigation Measure 3A.8-6. Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure. 3A.9-2: Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements Contained in Those Plans 3A.9-3: Develop and Implement a BMP and Water Quality Maintenance Plan3A.94: Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream of the Prqect Site and Make Improvements if Necsssary
67-51
67-54
67 -55
67-56
Resolution No. 10069Page 48 of61
05/10/2022 Item No.8.
Noise
YesYes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The owner/applicant has implementednoise reducing construction practices included as part of the required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with theserequirements has been monitored throughconstruction inspection.The owner/applicant has been workingclosely with their contractors during thecourse of grading and construction tominimize ground bome noise andvibration. The owner/applicant has beenchallenged due to the extent ofthe blastingneeded for the grading ofthe subdivision.The owner/applicant and their contractorsare working very hard to minunize thevibration and disturbance to existingresidents in the vicinity ofthe blasting.The owner/applicant as providedmonitoring reports to the Crty veri8/ing that all ground borne noise and vibration is
within allowable tbresholds andelrninating any possibility of structuraldamase to existine residential units.The owner/applicant continues to mak€efforts to reduce noise from grading andconstruction in the vicinity ofexrstingresidents. Night work is necessary due to impacts to the travelling public during the
normal workday. The night work has been
disruptive to some existing residences. TheCDD is working closely to monitor thenoise impacts in the night time hours tominimize imnacts to existing residentsAll stationary construction equipment, ifpresent, is muffled to reduce noise inaccordance with noise requirements.The owner/applicant continues to makeefforts to reduce noise from sradins and CD
cD (EXP)CD (EXP)
CD (E)
CD
G,C
cC
I, OG
M
3.{. I I -1 : Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, andMonitor and Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors.3.A. I l -3: Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration fromPrqect Generated Construction Activities.3A. I l -4: Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Increases in Noise from ProjectGenerated Operational Traffic on Off-site and On-Site Roadways.3A. I 1-5: Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-Generated Stationary Sources.
WE SPA Mitigation Measure 4.12-1: Implement measures to prevent exposure of sensitive receptors to increases in noise from proiect-generated operational traffic on offsite and onsite roadwavs. 67-57
67-5867-5967-6067-61
Resolution No. 10069