Folsom City Council
December 13, 2022

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP),
which outlines monitoring standards,
frequency and baseline modeling.

The Owner/applicant has submitted
monthly reports to the City and
SRWQCB. There are no off-site
elements outside the City limits for
this subdivision.

Before approval of these improvement plans, the required for all project phases.discretionary development application shall obtain NPDES MS4 Municipal Stormwater Permit and Grading Permit, comply with the City 's Grading Ordinance and County all measures in their drainage plansdrainage and stormwater quality standards, and commit to implementing and erosion and sediment conhol plans to avoid and mrnlmlze erosron and mnoff into Alder Creek and all wetlands and other waters that would remaln on-site. Detailed information about stormwater runoff standards and relevant city and county regulation is provided in chapter 3A.9, "Hydrology and water Quality." The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development entitlement shall irnplement stormwater qualrty ireatment controls consistent with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Flacer Regions in effect at the time the application is submitted. Appropriate runoff controls such as berms, storm gates, off-stream detention basins, overflow collection areas, filtration systems, and sediment traps shall bi implemented to control siltation and the potential discharge ofpollutants. Development plans shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) features, such as pervious sfips, permeable pavements, bioretention ponds, vegetated swales, disconnected rain gUtter downspouts, and rain gardens, where appropriate. Use of LID features is recommended by the EPA to minimize impacts on water_quality, nyarology, and sheam geomorphology and is specified as a method for protecting water quality in the pioposed specific plan. In addition, free spanning bridge systems shall be used for all roadway crossings over wetlands and othei raters that are retained in the on-site open space. These bridge systems would maintain the natural and restored channels ofcreeks, including the associated wetlands, and would be designed with sufficient span width and depth to provide for wildlife movement along the creek conidors even during high- flow or flood events, as specified in the 404 permit.

In addition to compliance with City ordinances, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development appliiation shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Managemint Practices (BMPs) that comply with the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Centrat Vailey RWQCB, to reduce water quality effects during construction. Detailed information about the SWPPP and BMPs are provided in Chapter 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality." Each project development shall result in no net change to peak flows into Alder Creek and associated tributiries, or to Buffalo Creek, Carson Creek, and Coyote Creek. The project applicant(s) shal1 establish a baseline ofconditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow conditions shall be established for 2-, 5-, and 100-year storm events. These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the stormwater system on the SPA. The baseline conditions, monitoring standards, and a monitoring pro$am shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. Water quality and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance standards, which are described in Chapter 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality," are met and shall be designed as off-stream detention basins. Discharge sites in6 AldeiCreek and associated tributaries, as well as hibutaries to Carson Creek, Coyote Creek, and Buffalo to ensure that conditions met. Conective measures shall be Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The MDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has recorded
Declarations of Covenants &
Restrictions (DCR's) in compliance with
the requirements of the USACE permit.

The DCR's are shown on the final map.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of
grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities for
any project
development
phase
containing
wetland
features or other
waters of the
U.S. The MMP
must be
approved before
any impact on
wetlands can
occur.

Mitigation shall
be implemented
on an ongolng
basis
throughout and
after
implemented as necessary mitigation measures will be satisfied when the are met for 5 consecutive yeaxs without undertaking conective measures to meet the performance standard.

See FEIR/FEIS Appendix S showing that the detention basin in the northeast corner ofthe SPA has been moved off stream.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado County for the roadway connections, Sacramento County for the detention basin west ofPrairie City Road, and Caltrans for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements) such that the performance standards described in Chapter 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality," are met' Secure Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions and Values of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S,, and Waters of the State.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans and before any groundbreaking activity associated with each distinct discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application requiring filI ofwetlands or other waters ofthe U.S. or waters ofthe state shall obtain all necessary permits under Sections 401 and 404 ofthe CWA or the state's Porter-Cologne Act for the respective phase. For each respective discretionary development entitlement, all permits, regulatory approvals, and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats shall be secured before implementation of any grading activities within 250 feet ofwaters ofthe U.S. or wetland habitats or lesser dislance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, including waters ofthe state, that potentially support Federally listed species. The project applicant(s) shall commit to replace, restore, or enhance on a "no net loss" basis (in accordance with USACE and the Central Valley RWQCB) the acreage ofall wetlands and other waters ofthe U.S. that would be removed, lost, and/or degraded with implementation ofproject plans for that development increment. Wetland habitat shall be restored, enhanced, and/or replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the City, as appropriate, depending on agencyjurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes. As part ofthe Section 404 permitting process, a draft wetland mitigation and monitoring plan (MMP) shall be developed for the project on behalf ofthe project applicant(s). Before any ground-disturbing activities in an area that would adversely affect wetlands and before engaging in mitigation activities associated with each discretionary developmant entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall submit the draft wetland MMP to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, SaCramento County, El Dorado County, and the City for review and approval of those portions of the plan over which they have jurisdiction. The MMP would have to be finalized prior to impacting any wetlands.

Once the final MMP is approved and implemented, mitigation monitoring shall continue for a minimum of 5 years from completion ofmitigation, or human intervention (including recontouring and grading), or until the performance standards identified in the approved MMP have been met, whichever is longer.

As part of the MMP, the project applicant(s) submit plans for the creation ofaquatic habitat in order to adequately offset and replace the and services that would be lost at the SPA. shall prepare and
aquatic functions
3A.3-1b
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-13
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
constnrctlon, as
required.
account for the temporal loss of habitat, and contain an adequate margin of safety to reflect anticipated success. Restoration ofpreviously altered and degraded wetlands shall be a priority of the MMP for offsetting losses of aquatic functions on the SPA because it is typically easier to achieve functional success in restored wetlands than in those created from uplands. The MMP must demonstrate how the aquatic functions and values that wouid be lost through project implementation will be replaced.

The habitat MMP for jurisdictional wetland features shall be consistent with USACE's and EPA's April 10, 2008 Final Rule for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses ofAquatic Resources (33 CFR Parts 325 afi'332 and 40 CFR Part 230) and USACE's October 26, 2010 Memorandum Re: Minimum Level of Documentation Required for Permit Decisions. According to the Final Rule, mitigation banks should be given preference over other types ofmitigation because a lot ofthe risk and rmcertainty regarding mitigation success is alleviated by the fact that mitigation bank wetlands must be established and demonstrating functionality before credits can be sold. The use ofmitigation credits also alleviates temporal losses ofwetland function while compensatory wetlands are being established. Mitigation banls also tend to be on larger, more ecologically valuable parcels and are subjected to more rigorous scientific study and planning and implementation procedwes than typical permittee-responsible mitigation sites (USACE and EPA, 2008). Permittee-responsible on-site mitigation areas can be exposed to long-term negative effects ofsunounding development since they tend to be smaller and less buffered than mitigafion banks. The Final Rule also establishes a preference for a'\ratershed approach" in selecting locations for compensatory mitigation project locations, that mitigation selection must be "appropriate and practicable" and that mitigation banks must address watershed needs based on criteria set forth in the Final Rule. The watershed approach accomplishes this objective by expanding the informational and analytic basis of mitigation project site selection decisions and ensuring that both authorized impacts and mitigafion are considered on a watershed scale rather than only project by project. This requires a degree offlexibility so that district engineen can authorize mitigation projects that most effectively address the case-specific circumstances and needs ofthe watershed, while remaining practicable for the permittee. The SPA includes portions ofthe Alder Creek, Buffalo Creek, Coyote Creek, and Carson Creek Watersheds. The majority of the SPA is wiftin the Alder Creek Watershed. Alder Creek and Buffalo Creek are part of the Lower American fuver Watershed.

Carson Creek and Coyote Creek are part of the Cosumnes River Watershed. Mitigation credits may be available within the Cosumnes Watershed, but not within the American fuver Watershed and not within the sub- watersheds ofthe SPA. Therefore, aquatic habitats may need to be restored or created on the SPA and adjacent off-site lands, preferably within the a{fected watersheds, in order to successflrlly replace lost fimctions at the appropriate watershed scale where loss of firnction would occur. It is not likely feasible to provide compensatory mitigation for all aquatic resource impacts on site.

Therefore, a combination ofon-site and off-site permittee-responsible mitigation and mitigation banking would likely be necessaxy to achieve the no-net-loss standard.

The SPA is located within the service areas of several approved mitigation banks (e.g., Bryte Ranch, Clay Station, Fitzgerald Ranch, and Twin City Mitigation Bank). The majority of compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is proposed to be accomplished at an agency approved mitigation bank or banks authorized to sell credits to offset impacts in the SPA. The applicants' biological consultant, ECORP, has identified Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
auaitatitlty ofapproximately 31 vemal pool credits and 228 seasonal wetland credits at mitigation banks whose service area includes the SPA. Additional credits may also be available from pending, but not yet approved, mitigation banks. However, availability is subject to change and, as noted above, a combination of mitigation bank credits and permittee-responsible on and off-site mitigation may be necessary to fully offset project impacts on wetlands and other waters of the U.S. If USACE determines that the use of mitigation bank credits is not sufficient mitigation to offset impacts within the SPA, the October 26, 2010 Memorandum Re: Minimum Level of Documentation Required for Permit Decisions requires USACE to specifically demonsffate why the use ofbank credits is not acceptable to USACE in accordance with Section 33 CFR 332.3(a)(l).

Compensatory mitigation for losses of stream and intermittent drainage channels shall follow the Final Rule Guidelines, which specify that compensatory mitigation should be achieved th'rough in-kind preservation, restoration, or enhancement within the same watershed, subject to practicability considerations. The wetland MMP shall address how to mitigate impacts on vemal pool, seasonal swale, seasonal wetland, seep, maxsh, pond, and intermittent and perennial stream habitat, and shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented io avoid and/or mitigate any off-site project-related impacts. The wetland compensation section ofthe habitat MMP shall include the following:
> Compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites. In General, compensatory mitigation sites should meet the following criteria, based on the Final Rule; . located within the same watershed as the wetland or other waters that would be lost, as appropriate and practicable;
' located in the most likely position to successfully replace wetland functions lost on the impact site considering watershed-scale features such as aquatic habitat diversity, habitat connectivify, available water sources and hydrologic relationships, land use trends, ecological benefits, and compatibility with adjacent land uses, and the likelihood for success and sustainability; > A complete assessment ofthe existing biological resources in both the on-site preservation areas and off- site compensatory mitigation areas, including wetland functional assessment using the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) (Collins et al. 2008), or other appropriate wetland assessment protocol as determined tbrough consultation with USACE and the USFWS, to establish baseline conditions; > Specific creation andrestoration plans for each mitigation site; > Use of Cfu{M to compare compensatory wetlands to the baseline CRAM scores from wetlands in the SPA. The compensatory wetland CRAM scores shall be compared against the highest quality wetland of each type from the SPA;
> Cfu{M scores, or otler wetland assessment prctocol scores, from the compensatory wetlands shall be compared against the highest quality wetland scores for each wetland type to document success of compensatory wetlands in replacing the functions ofthe affected wetlands to be replaced; Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
> Monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements, and the following elements:
. ecological performance standards, based on the best available science, that can be assessed in a practicable manner (e.g., performance standards proposed by Barbour et al. 2007). Performance standards must be based on attributes that are objective and verifiable; . assessments conducted annually for 5 years after construction or restoration of compensatory wetlands to detemine whether these areas are acquiring wetland functions and to plot the performance trajectory ofpreserved, restored or created wetlands over time.
. assessments results for compensatory wetlands shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
. assessments analysis conducted annually for 5 years after any construction adjacent to wetlands preserved on the SPA to determine whether &ese areas are retaining flurctions and values. Assessments results for wetlands preserved on site shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
I analysis ofassessments data, including assessment ofpotential stressors, to determine whether any remedial activities may be necessary;
. conective measures if performance standards are not met; . monitoring of plant communities as performance criteria (amual measure of success, during monitoring period) and success criteria (indicative of achievement of mitigation habitat requirement at end of monitoring period) for hydrologic function have become established and the creation site "matures" over time;
' GIS analysis of compensatory wetlands to demonshate actual acreage of functioning wetland habitat; . adaptive management measures to be applied if performance standards and acreage requirements are not being met;
r responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and . responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifuing success or prescribing implementation or conective actions.

A final operations and management plan (OMP) for all on- and off-site permittee-sponsored wetland preservation and mitigation areas shall be prepared and submitted to USACE and USFWS for review, comment and preliminary approval prior to the issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. The plan shall include detailed information on the habitats present within the preservation and mitigation areas, the long-term management and monitoring ofthese habitats, legal protection for the preservation and mitigation areas (e.g., conservation easement, declaration ofrestictions), and funding mechanism information (e.g., endowment). A final OMP for each discretionary development entitlement affecting wetlands must be approved prior to construction.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Caiifomia
Department of
Fish and Game
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department.

Before the
approval of
grading and
improvement
plans, before
any ground
disturbing
activities, and
during project
construction as
applicable for
all project
phases.

USACE has project will require an individual permit. In detail proposed wetland
its stage and once approved
by USACE, the MMP for the project is expected to
that would ensure no net loss
restoration, enhancement, and/or
replacement actrvltles of aquatic functions m the project vicinity Approval and implementation ofthe wetland MMP shall alm to tully mitigate all unavoidable impacts on jurisdictional waters of the U.S. including jurisdictional wetlands. In addition to USACE approval, approval by the Cily Sacramento County, El Dorado County, and the Cenhal Valley RWQCB, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes, will aiso be required. Approvals fi'om Sacramento County and El Dorado County shall be required for impacts resulting from off-site project elements occurring in these counties, such as the off-site detention basin in Sacraminto County and the roadway connections into El Dorado County. To satisS the requirements ofthe City and the Cenhal Valley RWQCB, mitigation of impacts on the nonjurisdictional wetlands beyond the jurisdiction of USACE shall be included in the same MMP. All mitigation requirements determined through this process shall be implemented before grading plans are approved. The MMP shall be submitted to USACE and approved prior to the issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. Water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 ofthe CWA will be required before issuance ofa Section 404 permit.

Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the project applicant(s) shall obtain water quality certification for the project. Any measures required as part ofthe issuance ofwater quality certification shall be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project appticant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans, El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Avoid Direct Loss 's Hawk and Other Raptor Nests. To mitigate impacts on Swainson's hawk and other raptors (including bunowing owl), the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the SPA and active burrows on the SPA. The surveys shall be conducted before the approval of grading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construction for all project phases. To the extent feasible, guidelines provided in Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson's Hawk Nesting Suweys in the Central Valley (Swainson's Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000) shall be followed for surveys for Swainson's hawk. If no nests are found, no further mitigation is required.

If active nests are found, impacts on nesting Swainson's hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishing appropriate buffers around the nests. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until the young have fledged, tire nest is no longer active, or until a qualified biologist has determined in consultation with DFG that reducing the buffer would not result in nest abandonment. DFG guidelines recommend implementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile-wide buffers, but the size of the buffer may be adjusted if a oualified biolosist and the City, in consultation with DFG, determine that such an adjustment would not be

34.3-2a
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-14
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verificd compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.The
compliance table is on file witl the City,
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of
grading,
improvement,
or construction
plans and
before any
ground
disturbing
activity in any
project
development
phase that
would affect
Swainson's
hawk foraging
habitat.
likely to adversely affect the nest. Monitoring ofthe nest by a qualified biologist during and after construction activities will be required ifthe activity has potential to adversely affect the nest. lf active burrows are found, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-disturbing activities.

The City shall consult with DFG. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors on all burrows to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial bunows within the project vicinity, as needed; however, burrow owl exclusions may only be used ifa qualified biologist verifies that the bunow does not contain eggs or dependent young. Ifactive bunows contain eggs and/or young, no construction shall occur within 50 feet ofthe bunow until young have fledged. Once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside burrows, these bunows may be collapsed.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans), such that the performance criteria set forth in DFG's guidelines are determined to be met.

Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2b: Prepare and Implement a Swainson's Hawk Mitigation Plan.

To mitigate for the loss of Swainson's hawk foraging habitat, the project applican(s) ofall project phases shall prepare and implement a Swainson's hawk mitigation plan including, but not limited to the requirements described below.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first, the project applicant(s) shall preserve, to the satisfaction ofthe City or Sacramento County, as appropriate depending on agencyjurisdiction, suitable Swainson's hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1:1 mitigation of habitat value for Swainson's hawk foraging habitat lost as a result ofthe project, as determined by the City, or Sacramento County, after consultation with DFG and a qualified biologist.

The l: I habitat value shall be based on Swainson's hawk nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, availabilify, and use within the City's planning area, or Sacramento County jurisdiction. The mitigation ratio shall be consistent with the 1994 DFG Swainson's Hawk Guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson's Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California, which call for the following mitigation ratios for loss of foraging habitat in these categories: 1:1 if within 1 mile of an active nest site,0.75:1 if over I mile but less than 5 miles, and 0.5:l if over 5 miles but less *ran 10 miles from an active nest site. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through credit purchase fiom an established mitigation bank approved to sell Swainson's hawk foraging habitat credits to mitigate losses in the SPA, if available, or through the transfer offee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento County. The City, or Sacramento County if outside City jurisdiction, after consultation with DFG, will determine the appropriateness of the mitigation land.
3A.3-2b
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-15
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Before approval of such proposed mitigation, the City, or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin, shall consult with DFG the appropriateness ofthe mitigation. Ifmitigation is accomplished through of the land to maintain
regarding
then suchconservation easement, an easement shall ensure the continued management for impacts on habitat at the off-site detention basin.

Swainson's hawk foraging values, including but not limited to ongoing agdcultural uses and the maintenance of all existing water rights associated with the land. The conservation easement shall be recordable and shall prohibit any activity that substantially impairs or diminishes the land's capacity as suitable Swainson's hawk habitat.

The project applicant(s) shall transfer said Swainson's hawk mitigation land, though either conservation easement or f;; title, to a third party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and DFG named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 8i5.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City or County, after consultation with DFG. The City, or County, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form ofthe conservation easement. The City, or County, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms ofthe conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

The project applicant(s), after consultation with the City, or County ofjurisdiction, DFG, and the ConiervationOperator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial mechanism that is suffrcient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement ofthe conservation easement.

If an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City's jurisdiction or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin to be dishibuted to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nonprbfit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity.

The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or fiansfer any interest of any conservation €asement or mitigation land it acquires without prior written approval ofthe City and DFG. Mitigation lands established or acquired for impacts incuned at the off-site detention basin shall require approval from Sacramento County prior to sale or transfer of mitigation lands or conservation easement.

Ifthe Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transferred to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG, or Sacramento County and DFG depending onjurisdiction ofthe affected habitat. The City Planning Department shall ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City's planning area is properly established and is functioning as habitat by reviewing regular monitoring reports prepared by the Conservation Operator of the mitigation site(s). Monitoring ofthe mitigation site(s) shall continue for the first 10 years after establishment of the easement and shall be funded tfuough the endowment, or other appropnate funding mechanism, established by the project applicant(s). Sacramento County shall review the monitoring reports Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to comnencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval ofany
ground-
disturbing
activity within
500 feet of
suitable nesting
habitat as
applicable for
all project
phases.

Before the
approval of any
ground-
disturbing
activity within
500 feet of
suitable nesting
habitat as
applicable for
all project
phases.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County and Caltrans).

Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird Nesting Colonies. To avoid and minimize impacts to tricolored blackbird, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall conduct a preconstruction survey for any project activity that would occur during the tricolored blackbird's nesting season (March l-August 3 l). The preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist before any activity occuning within 500 feet of suitable nesting habitat, including freshwater marsh and areas ofriparian scrub vegetation.

The survey shall be conducted within 14 days before project activity begins.

If no tricolored blackbird colony is present, no further mitigation is required. If a colony is found, the qualified biologist shall establish a buffer around the nesting colony. No project activity shall commence within fte buffer axea until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active. The size ofthe buffer shall be determined in consultation with DFG. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature ofthe project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, and other relevant circumslances.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries (i.e., U.S. 50 interchange improvements) must be developed by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans) and must be sufficient to achieve the performance criteria described above.

Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts, The project applicant ofall project phases containing potential bat roosting habitat shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for roosting bats.

Surveys shall be conducted in the fall to determine if the mine shaft is used as a hibemaculum and in spring and/or summer to detemine if it is used as a maternity or day roost. Surveys shall consist of evening emergence surveys to note the presence or absence of bats and could consist ofvisual surveys at the time of emergence. If evidence of bat use is observed, the number and species ofbats using the roost shall be determined. Bat detectors may be used to supplemenl survey efforts. Ifno bat roosts are found, then no further study shall be required.

Ifroosts ofpallid bat or Townsend's big-eared bats are determined to be present and must be removed, the bats shall be excluded from the roosting site. A mitigation program addressing compensation, exclusion methods, and roost removal procedures shall be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation.

Exclusion methods may include use of one-way doors at roost entrances (bats may leave but not reenter), or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be restricted during periods of sensitive activity (e,g., during hibemation or while females in matemity colonies are nursing young). The loss of each roost (if any) wiil be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction and installation ofbat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the oripinal roostine site. Roost reolacement will be imolemented before bats are excluded from the orieinal 3A.3-2c
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.3-2d
(FPASP
ErR/XrS)
r06
-16
106
-17
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe City and its Envhonmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
constmction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
District; U.S.

Fish and
Wildlife
Service; and
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval ofany
grading or
improvement
plans, before
any ground
disturbing
activities within
250 feet ofsaid
habitat or lesser
distance
deemed
sufficiently
protective by a
qualified
biologist with
approval from
USFWS, and on
an ongoing
basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for
all projeci
phases as
required by the
mitigation plan,
BO, and/or
BMPs.
roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.

Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates and Implement All Permit Conditions. No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for Federally listed vernal pool invertebrates, or within adequate buffer areas (250 feet or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS), until a biological opinion (BO) or Not Likely to Adversely Affect (lrILAA) letter has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development entitlements affecting such areas have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site conskuction.

Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation describing methods to protect existing vemal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1a, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss of vernal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation of habitat, account for the temporal loss ofhabitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards arc not met.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vernal pool habitat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss of acreage, function, and value of affected vernal pool habitat. The final habiiat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of404 Permits for Projects with Relatively Small Effects on Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction of the Sacramento Field Office, California (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an altemative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat 'acreage, function, and value.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application "potentially affecting vernal pool habitat" shall ensure that theie is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and restoration ofvemal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health. This standard shall be accomplished by requiring the project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application affecting vernal pool or seasonal wetland habitat to identify the extent of indirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identifoing all such habitat within 250 feet ofproject construction activities or by providing an altemative technical evaluation. Ifa lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage ofvernal pool habitat for each wetted acre of any indirectly affected vemal pool habitat at a ratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion ofthe Section 7 consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet ofthe habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS. The prolect applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for 3A.3-2g
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-18
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe City and its
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to cofiurencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Department of
Fish and Game
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of
grading or
improvement
plans or any
construction
activities
(including
clearing and
grubbing) that
affect the bed
and bank or
riparian and
freshwater
marsh habitat
associated with
Alder Creek
and other on-
site or off-site
drainage
channels and
ponds.
mitigated to the satisfaction of USFWS another BO
specific habitat acreage are mitigated by one project
again in another phase of the
phase or elemeni,
the project applicant(s) will not be required to mitigate for it project).

A standard set ofBMPs shall be applied to construction occurring in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USpWS; to constihrte a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land" for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be deveioped by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4a: Implement Section 602 Streambed The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a from DFG for all construction activities that would occur in tle Section t602
streambed alteration agrcement bed and bank
of Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds on the SPA. As a condition of issuance ofthe streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting riparian habitat shall hire a qualified restoration ecologist to prepare a riparian habitat Mitlp. fne draft MMP shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or compensate for impacts on the stream channel ofAlder Creek and other drainage channels within DFG jurisdiction, and the bed and banks ofthe on-site ponds. Mitigation measures may include establishment or restoration ofriparian habitat within the project's open space areas along preserved stream conidors, riparian habitat restoration off- site, or preservation and enhancement ofexisting riparian habitat either on or offthe SPA. The compensation habitat shall be similar in composition and structure to the habitat to be removed and shall be at ratios adequate to offset the loss ofriparian habitat firnctions and services at the SPA. The riparian habitat compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
> compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites; > complete assessment ofthe existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
> site-specific management procedures to benefit establishment and maintenance ofnative riparian plant species, including black willow, arroyo willow, white alder, and Fremont cottonwood; > a planting and inigation program ifneeded for establishment ofnative riparian trees and shrubs at shategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and irrigation may not be necessary if preservation offunctioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or ifrestoration can be accomplished without rrigation or planting);
> in kind reference habitats for comparison with compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and success criteria) to document success;
3A.3-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-19
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on frle with the City.

Califomia
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gmbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.
> monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be monitored for a minimum period offive years);
> ecological performance standards, based on the best available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount ofdead woody vegetation gaps and bare ground, and survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation planting sites must achieve 80% survival ofplanted riparian trees and shrubs by the end ofthe hve-year maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
> corrective measures ifperformance standards are not met; > responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and > responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or conective actions.

Any conditions ofissuance ofthe Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be implemented as part ofproject construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval ofany grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site drainage channels under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and ripadan habitat.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the Caltrans.

Conduct Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine ifvalley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concunently with any special-status plant surveys conducted on site as special-status plant surveys are floristic in nahre, i.e. require that all species encountered be identified, and require preparation of a plant community map. If valley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report to the City of Folsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any of the off-site project elements.

Ifvalley needlegrass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent ofthe community shall be mapped and the acreage ofthis community type, ifany, that would be removed by project implementation shall be calculated. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting valley needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City ofFolsom to determine appropriate mitigation for removal ofvalley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation.

Mitigation measures shall include one or more ofthe following components sufficient to achieve no net loss of vallev needleerass grassland acreaee: establishment ofvallev needlegrass grassland within proiect's open 3A.3-4b
(FPASP
EIR/f,IS)
106
-20
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe owner/applicant obtained a Tree
Permit from the Community
Development Department for the
removal ofprotected oak trees that
were impacted by the grading and
construction ofPhase I ofthe Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch project.

The Tree Permit was approved prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.

The owneriapplicant paid in-lieu
fees for the removal of some trees,
the City approved a Tree
Replacement Plan for another
portion of the tree that were removed
and preserved existing oak trees in
El Dorado County for the remaining
mitigation for the total number of
protected trees in accordance with
this condition.

The Conservation Easements within the
Phase 1 portion ofthe subdivision were
fenced offaround their boundaries in
advance ofthe commencement of
grading and construction and the City
verified compliance by inspecting the
fence in advance of grading.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase
containing
protected trees
or oak
woodland.

Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts 0n Oak Trees Retained On Site. The project applicant(s) shall prepare an oak woodland mitigation and monitoring plan.

The project applicant(s) ofall on- and off-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or individuai trees shatt adiire to the requirements describeal below, which are consistent with those outlined in California Public Resources Code 21083.4. Pursuant to Sacramento County General Plan policy, the acreage ofoak woodland habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculated as the oak tree canopy area within stands ofoak trees having greater than 10% cover plus a 3O-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge ofthe tree canopy. Oak trees located in areas greater than 30 feet from stands meeting the grealer than 10% tree canopy cover criterion were considered isolated trees and not part ofthe blue oak woodland community, Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below. > Preserve approximateiy 399 acres ofexisting oak woodlandhabitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion of ground verification by a qualihed arborist, the actual amount ofoak woodland present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount presewed could also be siightly greater or lesser than 399 acres) > Create 243 acres of oak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination ofblue oak acorns, seedlings, and hees in the following SPA locations:
. Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat. . Preserve and passive open space zones throughout the SPA. . Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e. catch slopes).
. O*rer practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space. . Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodland mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
> A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defined below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination ofacorns, seedlings, and various sizes of container trees (#1 container, #5 container, #15 container) or hansplanted trees shall be incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) shall have a minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
3A.3-s (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-21
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
. One established acorn equals one unit (acorns will be over planted to maximize potential germination). . One oak seedling equals one unit.
. One #1 container oak tree equals two units.
. One #5 container oaktree equals three units.
. One #15 container oak tree equals fowunits.
. One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
. One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh). . Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to augment overall habitat values. Each non oak tree species shall represent unit values described above for oak hees, but non oak species shal1 comprise no more than 10% ofthe mitigation plantings. > Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento aad E1 Dorado Counties may be secured and placed under conservation easement in lieu ofonsite mitigation measures ifnecessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.
> Create oak woodlands offsite. Plant a combination ofblue oak acoms, seedlings, and ffees at off-site location(s), ifneeded to achieve the creation goal of 243 acres ofnew blue oak woodland habitat. This measure would only be needed if 243 acres ofblue oak woodland could not be created in the SPA. Off- site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation. Off-site tree planting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally support blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to project development. Planted areas shall be placed under conseryation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity. > The oak woodland mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant(s) shall include a maintenance and monitoring program for aly replacement trees. The program shall include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria, Replacement oak trees shall be maintained and monitored for a minimum ofeight years from the date ofplanting and inigation shall be provided to planted trees for the first five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80% survival rate for planted trees by the end ofthe eight year maintenance and monitoring period. Dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department.

The security will be forfeited ifthe pioject applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and monitoring and meet the success criteria.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation
The project applicant(s) of all on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated trees and the off-site Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S' 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; and the underground sewer force main shall develop a map depicting the tee canopy of all oak trees in the survey area and identifying the acreage oftree canopy that would be preserved and the acreage that would be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak hees (those not located within the delineated boundary of oak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director. As a condition ofthe tree removal permit, project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement. The City's Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project applicants have developed a plan, as set forth Section 10 ofthe Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (attached to this EIR/EIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide compensatory mitigation for removal ofprotected trees in the SPA. In addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the following elements shall be included in a protected tree mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and agreed upon by the City:
> Proiect applicant(s) ofprojects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered professional forester to perform a determinate survey oftee species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas ofthe project site proposed for tree removal and encroachment of development. The condition of individual trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
' 5 = Excellent; No problems - hee has no structural problems, branches are properly spaced and tree characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.
. 4 = Good; No apparent problems - hee is in good condition and no apparent problems from visual inspection, Ifpotential structural or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and more serious health problems can be averted. ' 3 = Fair; Minor problems - There are some minor structural or health problems that pose no immediate danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist report are completed correctly the defect(s) can be minimized or eliminated.
. 2 = Poor; Major problems - the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with conect arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. Ifthe recommended actions are completed correctly, hazard can be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. If no action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed. . i = Hazardous or non conectable condition - the tree is in exfemely poor condition and in non- reversible decline. This rating is assigned to a tree that has stnrchrral and/or health nroblems that no Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
, amount oftree care work or effort can charge. The issues may or may not be considered a dangerous situation. The tree may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an uracceptable risk of spreading the disease or pests(s) to other trees. .0=Dead-thetreehasnosignificantsignsoflife(deadorveryclosetobeingdead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criteria
> The determination for whether an isolated tree shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the condition and size ofthe tree as follows:
. Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation. . Trees rated 2 may be removed at 50% of the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation. ' Trees rated 3, 4, and/or 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation. . Native isolated oaks measuring 24 inches or greater dbh for a single trunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rated a 3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading ofthe SPA properties.
' Native oaks measuring b etween 12 and. 24 inches dbh and rate d a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom offooting to the top ofthe wall) would be required to protect the hee(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated 2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteria described here) would result. . Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 12 inches dbh shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the hee(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak hee mitigation planting criteria described here) would result. . Native oak trees measuring I inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated, included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated a 3, 4, or a 5. Credits shall only be accepted ifthe tree protection zone (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge ofthe tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater trees are protected on a construction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List. STPC shall not count ifthey the tree is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected fee to be preserved. The City shall accept the preservation of native oak trees in this size class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC criteria:
> Folsom Municipal Code requires one ofthe following be planted as compensation for each diameter inch of protected tree removed:

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
. half of a 24-inch box tree;
r one #15 container tree;
. two #5 container trees; or
. $ 1 50 inlieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution. > The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and inigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The pian shall include a 5-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acoms with an annual monitoring report that includes conections needed with proposed work plan, and notice ofcompliance within 90-days of annual monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The security will be forfeited ifthe project applicant or designated responsible party fails to fhlfill the Planting and Maintenance Ageement.
> To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected hees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all affected project phases shall install high visibiiity fencing outside the outer edge of the drip lines of all trees to be retained on the SPA during project consfuction. The fencing may be installed around groups or stands of trees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines of all trees are protected. Grading, henching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, irrigation, and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines ofprotected trees). Ifthe activities listed cannot be avoided within the drip line of a particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the tree in question shall be monitored for a period offive years and replaced only ifthe tree appears to be dead or dying within five years ofproject implementation.

Through a combination ofthe mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation ofblue oak woodland habitat in the open space areas, the project applicant(s) can satisfy the mitigation requirements for removal oftees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined through consultation with the Sacramento County Planning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with Caltrans.

Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for Construction Employees' Prior to beginning conskuction activities, *re Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees. The fiaining shall describe the importance ofonsite biological resources, inciuding special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests ofspecial- status birds; and roosting habitat for special-stahrs bats. The biologist shall also explain the importance of other resoonsibilities related to the orotection ofwildlife during construction such as inspecting open trenches (Addendum)
ws-t106
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
constmction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
California
Departrnent of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, within
suitable tadpole
habitat.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, within
suitable
northwestem
pond turtle
habitat.
and looking under vehicles and machinery prior to moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to briefthem on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by State and fsderal agencies, and ttre penalties for not complying with biological mitigation requirements. If new construcfion personnel are added to the project, the contractor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory haining before starting work. An environmental awareness handout that describes and illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project consfuction and identifies a1l relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.

Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours ofthe initiation ofconstruction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vemal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for westem spadefoot. Ifno westem spadefoot individuals are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. Ifwestern spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.

Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle Survey' The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconsffuction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours ofthe initiation ofconstruction activity within suitable habitat for northwestem pond turtle. Ifno northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the fmdings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no frrther mitigation shall be required. If northwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity ofthe project.
ws-2
(Addendum)
IYWPT-1
(Addendum)
r06
-23
106
-24
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
Yes
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City,
On June 10,2019, the US Army Corps
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
constnrction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
lctters arc on file with the Community
Development Departrnent.

Califomia
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Depatment
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
gound
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

During all
construction
phases
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey,
The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within 14 days prior to commencement of construction during the nesting season (l Februarythrough 31 August).

If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW. The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent ofthe nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist. Once the young are independent ofthe nest, no fudher measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside ofthe nesting season.

Comp$ with the Programmatic Agreement,
The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identiffing historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those adverse effects as required under Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Sheet Sacramento, CA 95816.

Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register ofHistoric Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables aad management steps perfonned for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly reference the Califomia Register ofHistorical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each individual development phase or off-site element, the applicable oversight agency (City ofFolsom, El Dorado Counfy, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) of all project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
> The project applicant shall retain the services ofa quaiified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identifv locations that are sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of NB-1
(Addendum)
3A.Sla
(Addendum)
3A.S1b
(Addendum)
106
-t<
106
:26
106
31 Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
known resources, geomorphology, and topography. The inventory report shall specifu the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate > The identification ofany sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction ofeach individual development phase shali be performed in concert with monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.
> For each resource that is determined eligible for the CPJIR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation ofthe individual project development would result in damage or destruction of "significant" (under CEQA) cultural resources.

These findings shall be reviewed by the applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and heatment measures provided in this EIR/EIS. > Where possible, the project shall be configured or redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or lised resources. Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place ifpossible, as suggested under Califomia Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance ofhistoric properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800. > Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measures that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist ofdata recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because ofthe data they contain (which may contribute to research). Alternatively, for historical architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treafnent measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive, nanative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIFVEIS. > To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicabte oversight agency or the project applican(s) ofall project phases shall Fepare an appropriate prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate featment.
> These steps and doclments may be combined with the phasing ofmanagement and documents prepared pursuant to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jwisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans)' Resoiution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesOn June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction, All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department. Compliance
with this condition is monitored through
consfuction inspection.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring If Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treahnent or Avoidance as Required,
To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of a1l project phases shall do the following:
> Before the start ofground-dishrbing activities, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity ofthe project APE, to educate them about the possibility ofencountering bwied cultural resources and inform them ofthe proper procedures should cultural resources be encountered. > As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-la and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion ofthe SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with respect to monitoring. > Should any culhral resources, such as sffuctural features, unusual amounts ofbone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity ofthe find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation ofthe specific site and shall assess the significance ofthe find by evaluating the resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. Ifthe resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval ofrecommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved mitigation before resuming constmction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the Cify of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitivity training program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for construction supervisors. The sensitivity training pro$am shall provide information about nofification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for coordination between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and information about other treatment or issues that may arise ifcultural resources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocol shall be communicated to all new construction oersonnel durins orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible locafion inside the 34"5-2
(Addendum)
106
-28
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThere have been no human remains
discovered during the course ofgrading
and construction in the project.

Sacramento
County
Coroner; Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
During all
ground
disturbing
activities, for
any project
phase.
constructionjob hailer. The phone ofthe USACE cultural resources staff also be included.

The on-site sensitivity training shall be carried out each time a new confactor wiil begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor.

If unanticipated discoveries ofadditional historic properties, dehned in 36 CFR 800. I 6 (l), are made during the constouction ofthe project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
> The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, ifgiven the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 1 0O-foot radius of the unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of Attachment G of the HPMP. The Constnrction Manager, or archaeologicai monitor, if present, shall noti$ the USACE within 24 hours of the discovery. > The USACE shall notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance witlt this HPTP.

Once the USACE makes a formal determination of eligibility for the resource, the USACE will notify the SHPO within 48 hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an opportunity to comment on appropriate heatment. The SHPO shall respond within 72 hours ofthe request to consult. Failure ofthe SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the treatment measures.

The project applicants shall be requied to submit to the City proofofcompliance in the fonn ofa completed training roster and copy oftaining materials.

Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.

In accordance with the Califomia Health and Safety Code, ifhuman remains are uncovered during ground- disturbing activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area ofthe find and notiff the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature ofthe remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries ofhuman remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Seclion 7050.5tb]). If the coroner determines that the remains are those ofa Native American, he or she must contact the NAHC by pl.rone within 24 hours of making that determination (Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).
3A,$,3
(Addendum)
106
:29
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe owner/applicant has provided
Geotechnical Report to the City. The
Geotechnical report for the subdivision is
on file with the City.

Geology and Soils
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Depadment
Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
ground-
acting on notification ofa discovery ofNative American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code.

Upon the discovery ofNative American remains, the procedures above regarding involvement ofthe applicable county coroner, notification ofthe NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensue that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make recommendations. A range ofpossible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and analysis, preservafion in place, relinquishment ofthe remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatrnent. As suggested by AB 2641 (Chapter 863, Statutes of2006), the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery ofadditional remains. AB 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
> record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, > use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or > record a reintemment document with the county.

The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance ifthe NAHC is unable to identifu an Most Like'ly Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being ganted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its au*rorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist' Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof ofcompliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy oftraining materials.

Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. Before building permits are issued aad construction activities begin any project development phase, the project applicant(s) of each project phase shall hire a licensed geotechnical engineer to prepare a final geotechnical subsurface investigation report for the on- and off-site facilities, which shall be 3A.7-1a
(FPASP

EIRUEIS)
106
-30
Resoiution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
Compliance with this condition has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

Compliance with this condition has been
monitored through constmction
inspection by the City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Depafinent
City of Folsom
Community
disturbing
activities.

Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
ground-
disturbing
activities.

Before the start
ofconstruction
activities.
submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified below). The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make recommendations on the following:
site preparation;
soil bearing capacity;
appropriate sources and types of fill;
potential need for soil amendments;
road, pavement, and parking areas;
sfructural foundations, including retaining-wall design; grading practices;
soil conosion of concrete and steel;
erosion/winterization;
> seismic ground sbaking:
> liquefaction; and
> expansive/unstablesoils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant(s) of each project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavatron, placement of fill, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on both on- and off-site construction areas.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach appiicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion issued, the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase that would be Control Plan. Before grading permits are
located within the City ofFolsom shall
retain a California Registered Civil Engineer
erosion control plan shall be submitted to the
grading and
sradins
3A.7-1b
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.7-3 (FPASP
ErwErs)
106
-31
106
-32
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe Community Development
Department has reviewed and all
improvement plans in the subdivision to
verifi compliance with mitigation
measure.

Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
earthmoving
activities.
permits
Hillside
for all new development. The plan shall be consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance, the City's Development Guidelines, and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a Califomia Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills.

The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west ofPrairie City Road, the project applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Deparfinent before issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall be consistent with Sacramento County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location, implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description ofmeasures designed to control dust and stabilize the construction-site road and entrance, and a description of the location and methods of sttirage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use ofdetention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering ofstockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion.

Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction ofretaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabilization ofconstruction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction conhactor is responsible for securing a source of transportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 34,.9-1 (discussed in Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land") would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.

Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist ofperforated pipe and gravel, sunounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months away from building foundations. 3A.7-s (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-33
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance witlt this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement ofgrading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with tbis Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020- The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The Citv and its
City ofFolsom
Community
Deveiopment
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of smalliot
final maps and
building
permits for all
discretionary
development
project,
including all
on- and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
earthmoving
activities in the
Ione and
Mehrten
Formations.

To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particuiar discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures for reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use ofon-site equipment, worker commute trips, and truck trips carrying materials and equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for construction (e.g., concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construition. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most cunent list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract applicant(s) for any particular discretionary developmentwith the selected primary contractor. The andthe
Construction-Generated GHG Emissions.Implement Additional Measures to atethat substantiates
Assess the Signilicance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically important paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
> Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the lone or Mehrten Formations, the project applicant(s) shall retain a quaiified paleontologist or archaeologist to tain all construction personnel involved with earthmoving activities, including the site superintendent, regarding the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during constuction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered. > Ifpaleontological resources are discovered during earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall immediately cease work in the vicinity ofthe find and notifi the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society ofVertebrate Paleontology guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Paleontological Resources are Discovered,Personnel Education, Stop WorkConduct 3A.4-l (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.7-10
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and
106
-35
106
-34
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
project
construction.
considered infeasible for The
report, including the substantiation
approved by the City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary conhactor
requiring that the list of feasible measures be
to manage the construction ofeach development project. By established prior to the selection ofa primary contractor, this measure requires that the ability of a cottractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inhereni to the selection process.

SMAQMD's recommended measures for reducing conskuction-related GHG emissions at the time of writing this EIR/EIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
> Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
' reduce unnecessary idling (modiff work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfod); ' perform equipment maintenance (inspections, detect failures early, conections); . train equipment operators in proper use of equipment; . use the proper size ofequipment for thejob; and
. use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains). > Use alternative fuels for electricity generators and welders at consfuction sites such as propane or solar, or use electrical power.
> Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen [NOx] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.) Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB 2009b).
> Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, hansit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction worker commutes.
> Reduce electricity use in the construction office by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more efficient ones' > Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and demolition debris (goal ofat lcast 75% by weight). > Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials (goal ofat least 20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for toadway, parking lot, sidewalk and curb materials). > Minimize the amount of concrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon confiete option. > Produce concrete on-site if determined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
The owner/applicant worked with an
organization Urban Wood Rescue which
is a program in association with the
Sacramento Tree Foundation that makes
wood products from large trees that are
removed as a result of development. The
owner/applicant provided most of the
large trees that were removed as a part of
the grading and construction for the
project to Urban Wood Rescue and they
made table, fumiture, etc. from the ffees
that were provided. The remaining trees
and tree canopy was mulched by the
owner/applicant and is stored on site to
use as mulch in the landscape areas
throughout the project. No removed trees
were transponed to the landfill in
accordance with this condition of
approval.

The subdivision is not within any
identified area where contaminated
groundwater is present. Therefore there
is no required Phase I or Phase 2
Environmental Assessment required.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Departrnent
Hazards and llazardous Materials
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
offinal maps
and/or building
permits for all
project phases
requiring
discretionary
approval,
including all
on- and off-site
elements.

Before and
during earth
moving
activities
> Use EPA-certified SmartWay trucks for deliveries and equipment transport. Additional information about the SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is available from ARB's Hear,y-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).
> Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist ofthe use ofnonpotable water from a local source. t uUO'Oon ,o SyAQMD-recommended measures, construction activity shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.

Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The h-ees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary funding for urban and community forestry program (such as the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute [Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensue that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that of all harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequesfation (e.g., furniture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and fund an oflsite hee program that includes a level oftree planting that, at a minimum, increases carbon sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime. This program shall be funded by the project applicant(s) of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an independent Certihed Arborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements ofMitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3, "Biological Resources - Land." Final approval of the program shall be provided by the City.

Components ofthe program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the City of Folsom would simultaneously mitigate the loss of oak woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The California Urban Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008). All unused vegetation and hee material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative material should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant.

Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments and Implement Required Measures. The project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing for all areas ofthe SPA 3A.4-2b
(FPASP
EItl/EIS)
3A.8-2 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-36
106
-37
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThere are no overhead powerlines
existing within this subdivision and all
proposed and fuhre utility lines to serve
this subdivision will be olaced
City of Folsom
Community
At the
submission of
and include, as necessary, analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potential contamination sites that have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 3A.8-1) before construction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substances:
> Prepare a plan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off- site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution of clean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall include measures that ensure the safe transport, use, and disposal of contaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and treat the contaminated gloundwater to remove contaminants before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The project applicant(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicabie Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal ofhazardous materials removed from the site at an appropriate off-site disposal facility.
> Notify the appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies ifevidence ofpreviously undiscovered soil or groundwater contamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction activities. Any contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County Environmental Management Department, Central Valley RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state, or local regulatory agencies. > Oblain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD pertaining to the contents of any existing pole- mounted.transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall determine whether existing on-site electrical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is identified, the maintenance and/or disposal ofthe transformer shall be subject to the regulations ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority ofthe Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Foisom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure. Potential purchasers ofresidential properties near the transmission lines shall be made aware of the conhoversy sunounding EMF exposure. The Califomia Department ofReal Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant's final Subdivision Public Reoort aoplication. which shall be provided to purchasers ofproperties within 100 feet 3A.8-6 (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-38
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
underground in accordance with the
subdivision's conditions of approval.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
tentative map
applications.

Before issuance
of grading
permits for the
project water
features.
from the 100-1 15kV power line , or within I 50 feet from the 220-230 kV power line . The notihcation would include a discussion ofthe scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where background levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

Prepare and Implement a Vector Control Plan in Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District. To ensure that operation and design ofthe stormwater system, including multiple planned detention basins, is consistent with the recommendations ofthe Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District regarding mosquito control, the project applican(s) ofall project phases shall prepare and implement a Vector Control Plan. This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yo1o Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the City for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the detention basins under the City's jurisdiction. For the off-site detention basin, the plan shall be submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Conhol District 2008). The plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following components:
> Description ofthe project.
> Description of detention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
> Goals oftheplan.
> Description of the water management elements and features that would be implemented, including:
. BMPs that would implemented on-site;
. public education and awareness;
. sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
. mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
. stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater Management Plan). > Long-term maintenance ofthe detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable conditions or maintenance.by a homeowner's association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identifo and implement BMPs based on their potential effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could include, but are not limited to, the following:

34.8-7 (FPASP
ErR/[,rs)
106
-39
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlnes monitoring
standards, fiequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

Hydrology and Water Quality
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Submittal of the
State
Construction
General Permit
NOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development
and submittal of
any other
locally required
plans and
specifications
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all on-site
project phases
> build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as practicable to discourage dense plant grouth; > perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant densities to facilitate the ability ofmosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move throughout vegetated axea; > design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water. The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling; > coordinate cleaning ofcatchbasins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operations; > enforce the prompt removal ofsilt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to proteci water quality;
> ifthe sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception ofthe inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area ofwater for mosquito egg- laying (female mosquitoes can fly tirough pipes); and
> design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy dewatering ofthe unit ifnecessary (Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant(s) ofthe project phase containing the off-site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off+ite with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County).

Acquire
lSSUanCe
Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare
of grading permits, the project applicant(s) of all projects disturbing one or more acres (including and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the
phased construction of smaller areas which ate part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage under the SWRCB's NPDES stormwater permit for general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ), including preparation and submittal ofa projeclspecific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) shall also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City ofFolsom, El Dorado County (for the off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Alternative). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identify and speciff:
> the use ofan effective combination ofrobust erosion and sediment control BMPs and construction techniques accepted by the 'local jurisdictions for use in the project area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoffand the release, mobilization, and exposure ofpollutants, including legacy sources ofmercury from project-related construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion control and soil stabilization measues, sedimentation ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences > the implementation ofapproved local plans, non-stormwater management conhols, permanent post- construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities; 3A.9-l (FPASP
ErFt/EIS)
I06
-40
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). TheNDES Permit
Cify ofFolsom
Public Works
Department
and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

Before approval
of grading plans
and building
> the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other tlpes of materials used for equipment operation;
> spill prevention and contingency measures, including measures to prevent or clean up spills ofhazardous waste and ofhazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
> personnel training requirements and procedwes that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP; and > the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation ofthe SWPPP. > Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and constuctior/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as those listed below. > Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time ofconstruction. These measures may include silt fences, staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation. > Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoffvelocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filhation and transpiration. > Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to conhol erosion and runoffby convefng surface runoff down sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoff to a watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoffaccumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and facility infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be maintained and available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Calhans shall coordinate with the development and implementation ofthe overall project SW?PP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements Contained in Those Plans.

Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, demonstrating that off-site upstream runoffwould be appropriately convgyed through the SPA, 3A,9-2 (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-41
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
requires the implementation of BMP'S,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.
permits of all
project phases.
and that project-related on-site runoffwould be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfi cation impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
> an accurate calculation ofpre-project and post-project runoffscenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
> runoffcalculations for the l0-year and 100-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and detention facility locations finalized in the design phase; > a description of the proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system; > projecfspecific standards for installing drainage systemsl > City and El Dorado Counry flood control design requirements and measures designed to comply with them;
Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range ofconditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain current stream geomorphology.

These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) aad may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> use oflow knpact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater nrnoffat the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept stormwater);
> enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics; > bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bank erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for enhancement ofriparian habitat and maintenance ofnahual hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions; > minimize slope differences between any stormwater or detention facility outfall channel with the existing receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and > minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel and floodplain conidor, and utilize open bottom box culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction ofthe City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado Counfy Department ofTransportation that 100-year (0.01 Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicanthas
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has prepared storm
drain design reports and provided storm
drain calculations for all ofthe proposed
storm drainage features and
detentior/water quality and
hydromodifi cation basins necessary to
serve this subdivision. These reports
have been reviewed and approved by the
Community Development and Public
Works Departrnents.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Public Works
Department
Prepare plans
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all project
phases and off-
site elements
and
implementation
throughout
project
constmction.

AEP) flood flows would be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures within or down gradient ofthe SPA would not occur, and that hy&omodification would not be increased from pre-development levels such that existing stream geomorphology would be changed (the range of conditions should be calculated for each receiving water iffeasible, or a conservative estimate should be used, e.g., an Ep of I +10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with El Dorado County.

Develop and Implement a BMP and Water Quality Maintenance PIan, Before approval of the grading permits for any development project requiring a subdivision map, a detailed BMP and water quality maintenance plan shall be prepared by a qualified engineer retained by the project applicant(s) the development project. Drafts ofthe plan shall be submitted to the City ofFolsom and El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, for review and approval concunently with development oftentative subdivision maps for all project phases. The plan shall finalize the water quality improvements and further detail the structural and nonstructural BMPs proposed for the project. The plan shall include the elements described below.
> A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis ofproposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage design features.
> Predevelopment and post development calculations demonshating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City ofFolsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the "'Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Placer Regions" ([SSQP 2007b] per MDES Permit No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0142, page 46) and El Dorado County's NPDES SWMP (County of El Dorado 2004).
> Source conkol progams to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to recycling, street sweeping, storm dlain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization, prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management ofpublic hash collection areas.
> A pond management component for the proposed basins that shall include management and maintenance requirements for the design features and BMPs, and responsible parties for maintenance and funding. > LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but are not limited to:
. surface swales;
. replacement ofconventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement); . impervious surfaces disconnection; and
3A.9-3 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-42
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
There are no existing or proposed dams
upstream from this subdivision and
therefore there is no requirement to
perform the analysis required in this
condition ofapproval.

The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construction inspection.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Noise and Vibration
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal to the
City oftentative
maps or
improvement
plans.

Before and
during
construction
activities on the
SPA and within
El Dorado
Hills.
. trees planted to intercept stomwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be piaced along the natr.ral drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage pattems. The reduction in runoffas a result of the LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoffreduction credit system methodology described in "stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4" (SSQP 2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoffvolumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U,S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans.

Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream of the Project Site and Make Improvements if Necessary. Prior to submittal to the City of tentative maps or improvement plans the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall perform conduct studies to determine the extent of inundation in the case of dam failure. Ifthe sfudies determine potential exposure ofpeople or structures to a significant risk offlooding as a result ofthe failwe of a dam, the applicants(s) shall implement of any feasible recommendations provided in that study, potentially through drainage improvements, subject to the approval of the City of Folsom Public Works Department.

Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and Record Construction Noise near Sensitiye Receptors, To reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant(s) and their primary conhactors for engineering design and construction of all project phases shall ensure that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year ofproject construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
> Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. andT p.m.

Monday through Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. > All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-sensitive land uses.
3A.9-4 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.11-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
-43
106
-44
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesBlasting has been necessary tluoughout
the cowse ofgrading and construction in
this subdivision. The blasting has not
been within 2000 feet ofany sensitive
recentor. The blastins conhactor has
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
bulldozing and
blasting
activities on the
> All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction intake and exhaust mufflers and engine skouds, in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations. Equipment engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation. > All motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling. > Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead ofriveting, mixing concrete offsite instead ofon-site). > Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors artd generators) as planned phases are built out and fuhre noise sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to futue construction activities. > Written notification ofconstruction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet ofconstruction activities. Notification shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction activities are anticipated to occrlr and contact information, including a da1'time telephone number, for the project representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification. > To the extent feasible, acoustic barriers (e.g., lead curtains, sound baniers) shall be constructed to reduce construction-generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses. The baniers shall be designed to obstruct the line ofsight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site construction equipment.

When instal'led properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by approximately 8-10 dB (EPA 1971).
> When future noise sensitive uses are within close proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise- attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be iocated between noise sources and fuflue residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise. > The primary contractor shall prepare andimplement a construction noise management plan. This plan shall identify specific measwes to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above.

The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the construction noise management plan rs approved by *re City of Folsom. Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofthe applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside ofthe City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries.

Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
> To the extent feasible. blasting activities shall not be conducted within 275 feet ofexisting or futr.re sensitive receptors.
3A.11-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-45
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
obtained a blasting permit from the City
and the Community Development
Department has verified compliance with
the permit tlrough construction
inspection.

The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
tlrrough construction inspcclion.

There are no sensitive receptors within
600 feet of any on-going construction
and grading activity in the subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
SPA and within
El Dorado Hills
and the County
of Sacramento
Before
submittal of
improvement
plans for each
project phase,
and during
project
operations for
testing of
emergency
generators.
> To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
> All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blxting personnel licensed to operate in the Srate of Califomia.
> A blasting plan, including estimates ofvibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement ofthe first blast.
> Each blast shall be monitored and documented for groundbourne noise and vibration levels at the nearest sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-Generated Stationary Sources' The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following measures to reduce the effect ofnoise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet ofany noise-sensitive receptor:
> Routine testing and preventive maintenance ofemergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). All electrical generators sball be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers' specifications. > Extemal mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate featues designed to reduce noise emissions below the stationary noise sowce criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment enclosures shall be oriented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby noise- sensitive receptors.
> Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this aralysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daltime [7 a.m. to l0 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.l). Reduction ofparking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.

Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the da1'time [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction ofloading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as possible from noise sensitive land uses, constructing noise barriers between loading docks and 4oise- 3A.lt-5
(FPASP
Era|/Ers)
106
46 Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
aCofOin
the
appropriate
phase of
developme
nt ofthe
project.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
aCofOin
the
appropriate
phase of
developme
nt ofthe
project.

The landscape and sheetscape plans for
the subdivision include the required
masonry walls in the required height and
required locations. The Community
Development Departrnent will monitor
compliance during construction and
verifr that the sound walls are complete
prior to issuance ofa Certificate of
Occupancy in the subdivision,
The Community Development
Department will monitor compliance
during
sound
construction and veriS that the
walls are complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate ofOccupancy in
the subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
building
occupancy
Prior to
building
occupancy
sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for norse- sensitive land uses.

Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise barriers, as detailed below, to reduce traffic noise levels below the City ofFolsom exterior criteria of60 dB Ldn. > 6-foot tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway. > For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion ofthe project, a 7-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road. > For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase 1 and Phase 2 portions ofthe project, an 8-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise baniers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall banier height may be achieved by utilizing a banier and earthen berm combination. Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant pilor to use.

Banier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of I 1 7 -122 feet from the ultimate alignment ofWhite Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the Wlite Rock Road improvements are funded and moving forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services of a noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual property boundary setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measures to reduce traffrc noise levels in accordance with adopted City ofFolsom noise standards.

Interior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been implemented.
> For the firstrow ofhomes located along White Rock Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor building facades shall maintain minimum window assembly STC ratings of 34. > Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for a1l residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

4.13-l
(Addendum)

4.13-2
(Addendum)
106
-47
106
-48
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and
approved all traffic control plans
required for the construction of both
off-site and on-site improvements
for this subdivision to verifu
compliance with City ordinances and
to minimize delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site elements outside
the City limits for this subdivision.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifu adequate fire flow prior to
buiiding permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Services
City ofFolsom
Public Works
Department
City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of all
relevant plans
and/or permits
and during
construction of
all project
phases.

Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.
ln
constructionr access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffrc control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the California Departrnent of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approvai before the approval of all project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on haffic.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the Clty of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties and Caltrans).

Incorporate California Fire Code; City ofFolsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Rer.iew and Approval. To reduce impacts related to the provision ofnew fre services, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following, as described below. l. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic sprinkler systems, the availability of adequate fire flow, and the locations ofhydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section 17.57.080 ("Vehicular Access Requirements"). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Deparftnent. The design and operation of gates and barricades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers Standard, as required by the City ofFolsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for review and approval before the issuance of building permits.

In addition to the above measures, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall incorporate the provisions described below for the portion ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service axea, ifit is determined tkough City/El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 1 78-acre portion of the SPA. 3A.14-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3L.14-2
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-49
106
-50
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

The Cify Fire Deparhnent has reviewed
and approved all proposed impovements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifr adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal,rnent of Specific Plan hfrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Fire
Department,
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Traflic and
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

A phasing
analysis shall be
perfomred prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements based on the EDHFD fire prevention standards.

For commercial development, improvement plans showing roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval. For residential developmen! improvement plans showing property lines and adjacent streets or roads; total acreage or square footage of the parcel; the footprint of all structures; driveway plan views describing width, lengh, turnouts, tumarounds, radiuses, and surfaces; and driveway profile views showing the percent gade from the access road to the structure and vertical clearance shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklers shall submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a Califomia State Licensed C-l 6 Contractor.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy ofany structues until the project applicant(s) have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Departrnent veri$ing that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction ofthe City ofFolsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre area ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area.

Incorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs. The project applican($ of all prqect phases shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, antVor EDHFD for those areas ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verify to City ofFolsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance ofoccupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection l). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection l).
3A.14-3
(FPASP
ErRl/ErS)
3A,15-1a
(FPASP

EIRI/EIS)
106
-51
106
_{t
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal,rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Trafhc knpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building perrnit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Depadment
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements at the Sibley that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine RoadStreet/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2)' To ensure intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftw'o left-tum lanes, two through lanes, and one righltum lane. The applicant shall pay its proporttonate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 2).

The .l,pplicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersection (Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West),Mhite Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traflic signal must be installed.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Intersection 41). To enswe that the Hillside Drive/Xaston Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist ofone dedicated left tum lane and two ihrough lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigwed to consist of two through lanes and one dedicated right-tum lane. The applicant shall fimd and construct these improvements 3A.15-1b
(FPASP
ErRvErs)
3A.15-lc
(FPASP
EravErs)
3A,15-le
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
-53
106
-54
106
-55
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructwe
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Couaty Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department and
Caitrans
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the frst
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the frst
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

Before project
build out.

Design of the
White Rock
Road widening
to four lanes,
from Grant Line
Road to Prairie
Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parlrway/Liddle Road Intersection (Intersection 44). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway,Middle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2). To enswe that the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including 'Jug handle" ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. 50/Hazel Avenue interchange is a mitigation measue for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a progam established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Intersection 3). Improvements must be made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The cunently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line).

This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road 3A.15-1f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1h
(FPASP
ErRvErs)
3A.15-Ii
(FPASP
f,IR/EIS)
106
-56
106
-f,/
r06
-58
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic knpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
City Road, with
Intersection
improvements
has begun, and
because this
widening
project is
environmentally
cleared and
irlly tunded,
it's construction
is expected to
be complete
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
phase two of
the Hazel
Avenue
widening, from
Madison
Avenue to
Cunagh Downs
Drive, is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
to be the through movement. The improvements include two eastbound ttrough lanes, one eastbound right tum lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound right tum lanes, two westbound left hlm lanes and two westbound tlrough lanes. This improvement also includes the signalization ofthe White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10). To ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS between Cunagh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part ofthe County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.
3A.rs-lj
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-59
Reso'luiion No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit in
the
subdivision
This subdivision wilt pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

El Dorado
County
Department of
Transportation
complete. The
applicant shall
pay its
proportionate
share of funding
of
improvements
to the agency
responsible for
improvements,
based on a
proglam
established by
that agency to
reduce the
impacts to
Hazel Avenue
between
Madison
Avenue and
Cunagh Downs
Drive
(Sacramento
County
Roadway
Segnent 10).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
oroiect ohase
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signaiized and separate northbound left and right tr.rn lanes must be striped. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).
3A.15-ll
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-60
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
pennit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Irnpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior 1o
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF). Ciw Traffic Imoact Fees
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and the City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
Calhans
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Belore project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
the Sacramento
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S, 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/U.S, 50 Eastbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an altemate parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel route. It is preferred to alleviate the congestion on U.S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end ofthis reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by tlat agency to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east ofFolsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16 Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist ofone left-turn lane aad one shared tkouglr/right-turn lane. Protected left-tum signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Progtam, and are scheduled for Measure A funding.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shal1 pay its proportionate share offimding ofimprovements to the agency responsible.for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route l6 intersection (Ca'ltrans Intersection 12).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S, 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lane must be constructed. This improvement is cunently planned as part of the Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and 3A.15-lo
(FPASP
ErRyErs)
3A.1s-1p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-lq
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-61
106
-62
106
-63
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 08 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
complete.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project has
started since the
writing of the
Draft EIS/EIR.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Community Enhancements Project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U,S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffrc Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shatl pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segrnent 3). 3A.15-1r
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-64
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), CiE Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Counfy Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofRancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
and Sacramento
County
Depaf,tment of
Transportation
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
dwing which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U,S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S, 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Seginent 16). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

Participate in tr'air Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l8). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Anaiysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a 3A.15-ls
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-lu
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1v
(FPASP

EIFYEIS)
106
-65
106
-66
106
-67
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l0 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrasfruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 EastboundlFolsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Pmirie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Progam. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to r€duce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off-ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane ftom the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). 3A.15-lw
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-68
106
-69
Resolution No. 10670
Page ll1 of140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision wili pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first'subdivision
map to
determine
dwing which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Sheet - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound,{Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an improvement may involve a "braided ramp".

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S, 50 Eastbound i Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave (Freeway Weave 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S.50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbounil/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9). 3A.15-ly
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-lz
(FPASP

EINUEIS)
3A,15-1aa
(FPASP
ErwErs)
106
-70
106
-71
106
-1t
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 12 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision wili pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructr:re
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Sheet - Scoft Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S.50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this fieeway segnent must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 WestboundiOak Avenue Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29). 3A.15-1dd
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1ee
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
-73
r06
-74
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 13 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fe€s collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
paynent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
palnnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
fust subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32)' To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobitity Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32).

Participate in Fair Share
City Road Direct Ramp
Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Westbound/Prairie Merge (Freeway Merge 33). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mo6ility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 33).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offimding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).
3A.15-1ff
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1gg
(FPASP

EIWEIS)
3A.15-1hh
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-/5
106
-76
106
-77
Resolution No. 10670
Page1l4of140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'ment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before approval
of improvement
plans for all
project phases
any particular
discretionary
development
application that
includes
residential and
commercial or
mixed-use
development.

As a condition
ofproject
aDDloval and/or
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/I{azel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard offriimp diverge must be conshucted. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimprovements to the agency responsibie for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound,/Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concunent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Options for Altemative Transportation Modes. The project applicaat(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop commercial and mixed-use development concurrent with housing development, to the extent feasible in light ofmarket realities and other considerations, to internalize vehicle trips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction ofthe City Public Works Department. To frrther minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume ofsingle-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent oftravel by transit. The project's fair-share participation and the associated timing ofthe improvements and service shall be identified in the project conditions of approval and/or the project's development a$eement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT. 3A.15-1ii
(FPASP

EIR/T,IS)
3A.15-2a
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-78
106
-79
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 15 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Pian Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic knpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal,rnent of Specific Plan Infrastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Inftastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infiastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
fees to
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
as a condition
ofthe
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Concunent with
construction for
all project
phases.

Concunent with
construction for
all project
phases.

As a condition
ofproject
approval and/or
as a condition
ofthe
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the City's existing Trinsportation System Management Fee Progam to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travei on area roadways and intersections.
roadways and intersections.
nay fun Cost of Identified Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program. In accordance with Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because ofthe Specific Plan.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intenection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lane, fwo through lanes, and one dedicated right-tum lanp. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study 3A,15-2b
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4a
(FPASP

EIRUEIS)
106
-80
106
-81
r06
-82
106
-83
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 16 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
a building
permit,
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Trafftc Impact Fees
and Sacramento Comty W'ide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Departmenl
approval ofthe
hrst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
frst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley StreeVBlue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 6), To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-hrn lanes, fow tbrough lanes and a right-turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left tum lanes, four through lanes, and a right-tum lane. It is against the City ofFolsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffrc and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay r Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigwed to consist of one left-turn lane, one left-through iane, and two dedicated righrtum lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of frrnding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell Street/Nesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). 3A.15-4b
(FPASP

EIR/IIS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-84
106
-85
Resolution No. 10670
Pagell7of140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
paynnent of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected Fior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento CounW Wide
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
frst subdivision
map to
determine
dwing which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
burld out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
fust subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell StreeUlion Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2l), To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /Iron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a righttum lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, fow tlrough lanes and a right-tr.rn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23). To improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ hon Point Road intersection, the nodhbound approaches must be reshiped to consist ofone left-turn lane, one shared left-through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/lron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 24), To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / kon Point Road intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all ofthe following improvements are required:

The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a right- h.rn lane. The westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, one throush lane. 3A.15-4d
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4e
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
t06
-86
106
-87
106
-88
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
palment of Specific Plan Infrastruchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval ofthe
fust subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
and a through-right lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, tkee through lanes, and a right-tum lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lanes, three through lanes, and a righiturn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval ofthe first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be reconligured to consist oftwo left-tum lanes, two through lanes, and two right-tum lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements,
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3), To ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type of grade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County's Proposed General Plan. Implementation ofthese improvements would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).
3A.15-4g
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-4i
(FPASP
ErwErs)
106
-89
106
-90
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 19 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision witl pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal.rnent of Specific Plan Infrasfucture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specilic Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Countv Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis dhould
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
frst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
pmject phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7), To improve operation on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City ofRancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements t0 Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Ilighway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highway, this roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City ofRancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Gant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments l2-13), To improve operation on Hazel Avenue between Cunagh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50 westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento CounW's general plan because the county's policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes. 3A.1s-4j
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4k
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-41
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-91
106
-92
106
-93
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
pemit,
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the foilowing improvements with the
paynent of Specific Plan Inftastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
pnor to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and, therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Cunagh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvemenfs to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because ofother development in the region that would substantially increase haffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).
3A.15-4m
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4n
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-94
106
-95
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento Countv Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be nerformed
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County l)' To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right. Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock RoarVCarson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection l). To ensure that the Hazel Avenuefu.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane, one shared left *rough lane and three dedicated right-tum lanes.

Lnprovements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a progam established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Iatersection l).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1), To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Cahans State Route 50 Conidor Svstem Manasement Plan: therefore. it is not likelv to be imolemented bv Caltrans bv 2030. 3A.15-4o
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-4p
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4q
(FPASP

EIRTEIS)
106
-96
106
-97
106
-98
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan krfrastructrue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
pnor to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
appfoval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
prilject phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with dre Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Conidor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030, Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U,S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the eastbound auxiltary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4t). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Calhans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some trafftc offof U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of fi:nding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). 3A.15-4r
(FPASP
ErRl/ErS)
3A.15-4s
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-99
r06
r00
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific P'lan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Departrnent of
Transportation.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
lust subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6), To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures 3A.15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should stan the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.1 54u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over tle Oak Avenue Parkway offramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Sfeet - Scott Road offramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp (see mitieation measure 3,{.15-4u. v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be 3A.15-4t
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
l0l
106
702
142
I03
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
pennit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements witl the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
pnor to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this fieeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of firnding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, ihe southbound Oak Avenue Parkway-loop on ramp should merge with the easibound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Calhans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27), To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Sheet - Scott Road offramp. The slip on ramp fiom southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 27).
3A.15-4w
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4x
(FPASP

EIFI/EIS)
r06
r04
r06
10s
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal,rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This condition will be satisfied prior to
issuance of the 546n building permit in
the Phase 2 portion ofthe Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch Regency project in
accordance with previous conditions of
approval. The Phase 1 portion ofthe
Regency project consists of 545 dwelling
units, The VTSM for the Phase 2 portion
of the Regency project has not yet been
approved by the City Council.

The Capital Southeast Connector -JPA
has executed a construction contract with
Goodfellow Brothers, Inc. to construct
the Capital Southeast Connector from
Prairie City Road to East Bidwell Sheet.

The conshuction contract was executed
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
lmprovement
should be built,
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
fust subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35), To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35).

East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6), Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:

Northbound: one thru lane and one left tum lane in a 15O-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 1 50-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and > Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left tums to East Bidwell Street are against City poiicy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part ofthe entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell StreetMhite Rock Road. hior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street/lVhite Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes. and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual 3A.15-4y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

4.17-t
(Addendum)

4.17-2
(Addendum)
106
106
106
107
106
108
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Yes
in December of2020. Grading and
construction commenced in April 2021.

The project will include the relocation
and signalization of the existing White
Rock Road,/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The owner/applicant will
pay the Sacramento County
Transportation Development Fee prior to
issuance ofall building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the improvement plans for the
construction of these required
improvements including the plans for the
modification to the existing traffic signal
at the intersection ofEast Bidwell Street
and Mangini Parkway. These
improvements are cunently under
construction.

The required improvements in thrs
condition have been completed and
accepted by the City. These
improvements were constructed as part
of the off-site improvements for the
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Coi'nmunity
Development
Department
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements,
with the
exception ofthe
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 2
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project's responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be considered to be implemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction ofthe new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street{lftite Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry.

Figure 4-4 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway, Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection ',vith the following geometry (Figue 4-5 of the Addendum):
> Northbound: One left-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right- turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second thru lane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);
> Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- turn lane in a I 5O-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
> Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street wiil remain at two lanes fiom Mangini Parkway to US 50.

East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-6 ofthe Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared through-right lane with a 150-foot taper; > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane; > Westbound approach: One left turn lane in a 60-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one tlrough lane;

4.17-3
(Addendum)

4.17-4
(Addendum)
r06
109
106
110
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit in
the
subdivision
Mangini Ranch Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

The Community Development
Departmeni has approved the plans for
the reconstruction and signalization of
the East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek
Parkway intersection in accordance with
this condition.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
and one thru
southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
and the second
tbru southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.
> Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropdate taper.

Note that unsignalized left nims to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound accelention lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signatization will be triggered as part ofthe entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the future,
East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parlrrvay. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall reconshuct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 ofthe Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-tum lane in a I S0-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 1 50-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper. > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240-foot pocketpius 60-foot taper, and two through lanes.

The second southbound through lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way. > Westbound approach: One rigbt tum 'lane, plus one left-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions ofapproval from neighboring projects.

4.17-5
(Addendum)
106
il1
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
Phase 3
subdivision
Yes
Yes
The Capital Southeast Connector-JPA
project is cunently under construction.

The Connector project will implement
and complete Option A in this condition.

The owner/applicant shall implement the
required improvements to the
intersection in compliance with this
condition prior to issuance ofthe first
Certificate of Occupancy in the Phase 3
(Traditional Subdivision) portion of the
project.

The Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer
infrastructure including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the Alder Creek
Parkway sewer lift station and forccd
main to serve this subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA landowners and
have been completed and accepted by
the City and are cunently in operation.

The City obtained a letter from Regional
San which provides verification that
there is adequate capacity in the existing
Regional San conveyance and treatment
system to accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at buildout.

Confirmation from Regional San was
required because the Folsom Plan Area
is served by the existing Regional San
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Deparfinent
Utilities and Service Systems
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits
Before approval
offinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
offinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Caprtal Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion ofWhite Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate anticipated U-Turns. Expand or construct a signalized intersection as follows:
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right turns. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a lefi/u-tr.rn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U-turns. > Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict tuming movements to westbound right tums and southbound right trarns. The westbound right turn requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right tum requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figwe 4-8 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and Implement On' and Off-Site Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proofto the City ofFolsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is enswed through pa),ment ofthe City's facilities augm.entation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3,Chapter 3.40, "Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrastruchre and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate sewice to the project shall be in place for the amount ofdevelopment identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity, The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.

4.17-6
(Addendum)
3A.16-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

34.16-3
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
I
112
106
113
106
114
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Lift Station on Iron Point Road. The City
Sewer Lift Station and Forced Main
which connects to the Regional San Lift
Station has been accepted by the City
and is currently in operation.

The owner/applicant has conshucted the
necessary infrastructure to provide
potable water to the subdivision. The
potable Phase 1 water infrashucture for
the Folsom Plan Area has been reviewed,
approved and accepted by the City and is
cunently in operation.

The off-site potable water infrastrucfire
to serve the subdivision has been
reviewed, approved and accepted by the
City and is cunently in operation. In
addition, the City has verified that the
off-site potable water infrastructure is
adequate to sewe the subdivision.

Tlis condition is not applicable to this
subdivision. The water supply for this
subdivision is provided by the City of
Folsom Water Treatment Plant rather
than an Off-Site Water Treatment Plant
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department afld
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
Before approval
offinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Govemment Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation ofeach final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) ofthat project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the hnal subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or €ntitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, the project appiicant(s) of any particular discretionary deveiopment application shall submit proofto the City ofFolsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final subdivision map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction ofthe City. A certificate ofoccupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected), If an off-site water treatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on- site WTP alternative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval ofthe final project map shall not be granted until the City verifres adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final mao and issuance ofbuildine oermits for all proiect phases. A certificate of occupancy shall not be 3A.18-l
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.18-2a
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.18-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
115
106
r16
106
tt7
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfred
prior to
approval of
a future
TMP
The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City.

Additional Measures
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval offirst
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

Highway 50.
issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been conskucted and is in place.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input ofthe City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck haffic from the quaries with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quany truck traffic. The development a$eement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility untii a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, tle City of Folsom considers itselfa "responsible agencl'(as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a futue TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section I 5096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation shategy to address the cumulative impacts ofquarry truck traffic tlrough the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authodty to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or haffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk ofcancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than 296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009.

Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure AIR-
l-Land
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
118
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

March. Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Yersion2.2:7), or such different threshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than significant.

As an altemative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quary project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensifive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million tlreshold of significance identified above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
r A site-specific, projecrlevel screening analysis and/or Health Risk Assessment (HM) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides ofroadway segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. Each project- level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of discloswe to the public and decision makers. The project-level analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected fuhre traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel kucks), and emission rates representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk determined by in the HM exceeds 296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the results of the HRA, the quarry kuck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
' Implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, iffeasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both directions ofthe initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the dispersion and filtration ofmobile-source TACs associated with the adjacent roadway. These tees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the hees reach maturitv. which breaks the line of sisht Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
approval of
a future
TMP
The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval offirst
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
piace sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry kuck
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

50. between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes. These trees should be planted before occupation of any affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe construction ofpotentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progess toward maturity. The life of these trees should be maintained tkough the duration of the quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s).
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy of the affected residences and schools:
. equip all affected residences and school buildings developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle Anesting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air intake points to the interior rooms; ' use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from roadway air pollution sources as possible; and . develop and implement an ongoing education and maintenance plan about the filhation systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part ofthe Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific PIan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City ofRancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quany project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the SPA and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck ftaffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts ofannual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quarries, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-1-Land
(FPASP
ErRyErs)
106
119
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City ofFolsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jwisdiction of the City.

In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion ofthis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts drat could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumuiative impacts of quarry truck traffic tkough the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions ofthe TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the taffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an altemative (or in addifion) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quany project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive receptors to noise generated by quarry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of 3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above.

The City encourages implementation ofthe following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City ofFolsom to discuss mitigation shategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City ofFolsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides ofroadway segments that are identified in Table 4-8 as being potentialiy significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted using an approved three dimensional haffrc noise modeling piogram (i.e,, TNM or SoundPlan). Each projecl level analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City ofFolsom for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers. The projecrlevel analysis should account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance fiom the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the vear 2030 (includine the oercentase ofheaw trucks). Ifthe incremental Resolution No. 10670
Page I 34 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

The FPA landowners have satisfied all of
the mitigation measures for the design
and construction ofthe Phase i Water
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
>
increase in fiaffrc noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:

Model the benefits ofsoundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected receptors not to exceed a total height ofeight feet (two-foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this mitigation measure is determined by the City ofFolsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of rubberized asphalt at the expense ofthe quarry truck applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s).

Implement the installation ofrubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive receptors that carry quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of traffic noise levels. The inclusion of rubberized asphalt would provide an additional 3 to 5 dB oftraffic noise reduction. The cost ofconstruction using rubberized asphalt should be bome by the quarry truck applicant(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.

To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
. Conductaninteriornoiseanalysisoncedetailedconstructionplansofresidencesadjacenttoaffected roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks. . Determine the interior quarry truck haffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck applicant(s) should pay for the cost ofwindow package upgades (increased sound transmission class rated windows) required to achieve the interior noise level standard of45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part ofthe Folsom South of U,W. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet ofany residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off-Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructue and off-site water facility altemative improvements. The project applicant shall N/A106
120
Resolution No. i0670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
and Sewer Backbone Infrastructure to
serve the first of development in the
FPA. The Phase 1 backbone
Infrasfucture was completed and
accepted by the City in 20 I 8 and is
curently in use in the FPA and being
owned and operated by the City. Ttre off-
site water facility altemative
improvements were not implemented.

The water for the FPA was provided
through the conservation of existing
water in the Cify. The new water supply
altemative was validated in 2014.

Department and
City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
building
permits for any
project phase,
the project
applicant shall
demonshate to
the City's
satisfaction the
fair share
contribution
towards
implementation
ofBackbone
Infrastructure
and Off-Site
Water Facility
improvements
and associated
required
mitigation as
identified in the
Folsom South of
U.S. Highway
50 Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated
Negative
Declaration
(December
2014) or the
Revised
Proposed Off-
Sile Water
Facility
Alternative
Addendam to
the FPASP
EINEIS
coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Folsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastucture Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014):
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-l: Design above ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-1: Prepare and ImplementNOX Reduction Plan > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2: Pay Off-site Miligation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust Conhol Plan. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV'l: Conduct Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biologicai Opinion for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhom Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-4: Westem Spadefoot Toad > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-5: Westem Pond Turtle > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swatnson's Hawk Nesting Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foraging Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored Blackbird > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting Raptors > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status Bats > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-13: Conduct Surveys to ldentifl' and Map Valiey Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section 401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Waters of the State Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
(approved
December
2012); as
applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-15: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect lnpacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-1 1: American Badger > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with the applicable procedwes in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property heatment plans > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Culnral Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of ttre Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with Califomia Health and Safety Code Procedures. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure Vi-l: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure M-3: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-S(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan for the detention basin West ofPrairie City Road. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure MI-l: Greenhouse Gas Emissions > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVI-I: Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3: North of U.S. Highway 50 Water knprovements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure Vl4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water hnptovements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-I North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Revised Proposed Off-Site llater Facility Alternative Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS (approved Decemb er | 1, 2012):
> 3F.1-2a: Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural Facilities.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
> 38.1-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 38.1-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 38.1-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
> 38.2-la: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX Reduction Plan. > 38.2-lc: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particu'late Matter Monitoring Program during Construction.
> 38.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors. > 38.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to Acceptable Concentrations.
> 3B.4-1a: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during Construction. > 38.4-1b Prepare and Implement an Off-site Wafer Facilities Climate Action Plan. > 34.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 3A.5-1b: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation ofCultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Deshuction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring ifRequired, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> 3A.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with Califomia Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 3B.7-la: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement Required Measwes,
> 38.7-lb: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency Measures Into Final Pipeline Design. > 38.7-4: Implement Corrosion Protection Measures.
> 3B.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work ifPaleontological Resouces axe Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
> 3B.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 3B.8-ib: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials Management Plan. > 3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.

Resolution No. 10670
Page I 38 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThe Capital Southeast Connector - JPA
project commenced construction in April
2021. Since the project is now complete
this condition has been satisfied.

CD (E)M
> 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 3B.8-7a: Keep Conshuction Area Clear of Combustible Materials. > 3B.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. > 3B.9-la: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. > 38.9-lb: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. > 3B.9-3a: Prepare and lmplement Drainage Plan(s) for Structural Facilities. > 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision ofSufficient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment. > 38.1 1-l a: Limit Construction Hours.
> 3B.i 1-1b: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging. > 38.11-1c: Maximize the Use of Noise Barriers.
> 38.1 I -1 d: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction. > 3B.I I -le: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints. > 38.11-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization Measures. > 38.l2-1 : Provide for Continued Recreational Access as Identified in Mitigation Measure 3.14-1a. > 38.15-1a: Prepare Traffic Conhol Plan.
> 38.15-lb: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions. > 38.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert. > 38. i 6-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and knplement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
> 38.l7-la: Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practices. > 38.17-1b: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program. > 3A.18-1: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. > 3.A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. lAhile Rock Road Shoulder Improvements
The owner/applicant shall construct shoulder improvements along the project's entire frontage of westbor.rnd White Rock Road to the satisfaction of the City prior to approval of the first small lot final map. In lieu of constructing the aforementioned interim shoulder improvements, the owner/applicant may enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and post

20. Resolution No. 10670
Page I 39 of 140

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

YesThis condition will apply to the futrue
Phase 3 (Traditional Subdivision) and
therefore does not apply to the Phase lF
subdivision.
cD (E) (P)
cD (E) (P)
M
M
adequate security to the City's satisfaction to ensure construction ofsaid improvements; the secwity shall be for a minimum period of 10 years.

If shoulder improvements are constructed andlor funded by the owner/applicant, then said costs may be included in any applicable fee program established and approved for the Folsom Plan Area subject to approval by the Cify and the actual costs expended by the owner/_applicant may therefore be eligible for a credit and/or reimbursement.

If construction of the Capital Southeast Connector Project between Scott Road and the El Dorado County line has commenced during the term of the required Subdivision Improvement Agreement, then the shoulder improvement condition will be deemed satisfied and the security shall be released to the owner/applicant.

The owner/applicant shall presewe the oak trees shown in the blue color on the attached Site Plan Exhibit for the Traditional Subdivision. The owner/applicant shall also make every attempt to preserve the tree shown in red on the attached Site Plan Exhibit provided that the City Arborist concurs(sincethisoaktreewillbeapproximately3'lowerthanadjacentpadgrades). The additional land created from elimination of lots 49, 56, and 57 as shown on the Site Plan Exhibit shall be incorporated into the adjacent residential lots to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. Consistent with FPASP Policy 10.19, the Community Development Director will allow modifications to the development standards to order to accommodate preservation of the oak tree on Lot 62 as shown on the attached Site Plan Exhibit. This condition shall be satisfied orior to anoroval ofthe Final Mao for the Traditional Subdivision.

21. Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.16.

This page intenti.onally Ieft blank
to facilitate double-sided printing .

CI?Y OF
FOLS()l\[

DIATIIC'IVE IY NATURE

12/13/2022 Item No.16.
!, 1:5jr!.1 ri t r1!,ri
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 1211312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10963 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. for Environmental Consulting Services for the Benevento Family Park Project
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 10963 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. for Environmental Consulting Services for the Benevento Family Park Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom Parks and Recreation Master Plan (PRMP) was approved by the City Council in20l5. The PRMP identifies a future 19.0-acre park site, referred to previously as Park Site #51 andnow known as Benevento Family Park (Benevento). Resolution No. 10133, approved by the City Council on June 12,2018, established the new name. The park site is located on Broadstone Parkway and Carpenter Hill Drive. It has three main elevation tiers with alarge stock pond in the middle that terraces down toward Vista del Lago High School which is adjacent to the site.

At the August 25,2020 City Council meeting, a design contract was approved with Wilson Design Studios Landscape Architects (WDSLA) for the planning and design of Benevento Family Park as well as Neighborhood Park #3 (now named Prospector Park) in the Folsom Plan Area. A public workshop was held on May 19,2022, and a second public workshop was held on June 9, 2022. The participants at the public workshops assisted in the development of the conceptual Master Plan and voted for their preferred Master Plan, which formed the Master Plan subsequently presented to the Parks & Recreation Commission.

I