Folsom City Council
December 13, 2022

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
District; U.S.

Fish and
Wildlife
Service; and
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before *re
approval ofany
grading or
improvement
pians, before
any ground
disturbing
activities within
250 feet of said
habitat or lesser
distance
deemed
sufficiently
protective by a
qualified
biologist with
approval from
USFWS, and on
an ongoing
basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for
all project
phases as
required by the
mitigation plan,
BO, and/or
BMPs.
roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.
and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the
methods to protect existing vemal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1a, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss ofvemal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation ofhabitat, account for the temporal loss ofhabitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards are not met.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vernal pool habitat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss of acreage, functi.on, and value of affected vernal pool habitat. The final habitat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of404 Permits for Projects with Relatively Small Effects on Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction ofthe Sacramento Field Office, Califomia (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an altemative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat acreage, function, and value.

The project applicant(s) frir any particular discretionary development application "potentially affecting vernal pool'habitat" shall ensure that there is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for crealion and iestoration ofvernal pools and vemal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health. This standard shall be accomplished by requiring the project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application affecting vernal pool or seasonal wetland habitat to identify the extent of indirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identiffing all such habitat within 250 feet ofproject construction activities or by providing an altemative technical evaluation. Ifa lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage ofvernal pool habitat for each wetted acre ofany indirectly affected vernal pool habitat at a ratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion ofthe Section 7 consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet ofthe habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with from USFWS. The will not be to this measure for
3A3-Zg
(FPASP

EIWEIS)
106
-18
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to conmencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City,
California
Department of
Fish and Game
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of
grading or
improvement
plans or any
construction
activities
(including
clearing and
grubbing) that
affect the bed
and bank or
riparian and
freshwater
marsh habitat
associated with
Alder Creek
and other on-
site or off-site
drainage
channels and
ponds.
0r indirect impacts that have already been to the satisfaction of USFWS through another BO or mltlsatron plan (i.e., if impacts on specific habitat acreage ate mitigated by one project phase OI element, the project applicant(s) will not be required to mitigate for it again in another phase ofthe project).

A standard set ofBMPs shall be applied to construction occuning in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USFWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land' for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Mitigation Measure 3A,3-4a: Secure and Implement Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement.

The project applican(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a Section I 602 shea-mbed alteration agreement from DFG for all construction activities that would occur in the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds on the SPA. As a condition of issuance ofthe streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting riparian habitat shall hire a qualified restoration ecologist to prepare a riparian habitat MMP. The draft MMP shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or compensate for impacts on the stream channel of Alder Creek and other drainage channels within DFG jurisdiction, and the bed and banks ofthe on-site ponds. Mitigation measures may include establishment or restoration ofriparian habitat within the project's open space areas along preserved stream corridors, riparian habitat restoration off- site, or preservation and enhancement of existing riparian habitat either on or offthe SPA. The compensation habitat shall be similar in composition and structure to the habitat to be removed and shall be at ratios adequate to offset the loss ofriparian habitat functions and services at the SPA. The riparian habitat compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
> compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites; > complete assessment ofthe existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
> site-specific management procedures to benefit establishment and maintenance ofnative riparian plant species, including black willow, anoyo willow, white alder, and Fremont cottonwood; > a planting and inigation program ifneeded for establishment ofnative riparian trees and shrubs at strategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and irrigation may not be necessary if preservation of functioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or ifrestoration can be accomplished without inigation or planting);
> in kind reference habitats for comparison with compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and success criteria) to document success;
3A.3-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-19
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Califomia
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.
> monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be monitored for a minimum period of five years); > ecological performance standards, based on the best available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount ofdead woody vegetation gaps and bare gound, and survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation planting sites must achieve 80% survival of planted riparian trees and shrubs by the end of the five-year maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying fiees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
> corrective measures ifperformance standards are not met; > responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and > responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or corrective actions.

Any conditions ofissuance ofthe Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be implemented as part ofproject construction activitie! that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site drainage channels under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and riparian habitat.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the Caltrans.

Conduct Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine ifvalley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concunently with any special-status plant surveys conducted on site is special-status plant surveys are floristic in nature, i.e. require that all species encountered be identified, and require preparation ofa plant community map. Ifvalley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the boianist shall document the findings in a letter report to the City ofFolsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any ofthe off-site project elements Ifvatley needlegrass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent ofthe community shall be mapped and the acreage of this community t1pe, if any, that would be removed by proj ect implementation shall be calculated. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting valley needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City of Folsom to detemine appropriate mitigation for removal ofvalley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation.

Mitigition measrxes shall include one or more of the following components sufficient to achieve no net loss ofvallev needlesrass erassland acreage: establishment ofvalley needlegrass grassland within project's open 3A.34b
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-20
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe owner/applicant obtained a Tree
Permit from the Community
Development Department for the
removal ofprotected oak trees that
were impacted by the grading and
construction of Phase 3 of the Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch project.

The Tree Permit was approved prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.

The owner/appiicant paid in-lieu
fees for the removal of some trees,
the City approved a Tree
Replacement Plan for another
portion of the tree that were removed
and preserved existing oak trees in
El Dorado County for the remaining
mitigation for the total number of
protected trees in accordance with
this condition.

The Conservation Easements within the
Phase 3 portion of the subdivision were
fenced offaround their boundaries in
advance of the commencement of
grading and construction and the City
verified compliance by inspecting the
fence in advance of grading.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase
containing
protected trees
or oak
woodland.
space areas currently characterized by annual grassland, establishment ofvalley needlegrass grassland off- site, or presewation and enhancement of existing valley needlegrass grassland either on or offthe SPA. The applicant(s) shall compensate for any loss ofvalley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation at a minimum I :1 replacement ratio.

Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implem€nt Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees Retained On Site. The project applicant(s) shall prepare an oak woodland mitigation and monitoring plan.

The project applicant(s) ofall on- and off-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or individual trees shall adhere to the requirements described below, which are consistent with those outlined in California Public Resources Code 21083.4. Pu$uant to Sacramento County General Plan policy, the acreage of oak woodland habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculated as the oak tree canopy area within stands of oak trees having greater than 1 0% cover plus a 30-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge ofthe hee caropy. Oak trees located in areas greater than 30 feet fiom stands meeting the greater than 10% tree canopy cover criterion were considered isolated trees and not part ofthe blue oak woodland community. Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below. > Preserve approximately 399 acres ofexisting oak woodland habitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion ofground verification by a qualified arborist, the actual amount ofoak woodland present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount preserved could also be siightly greater or lesser than 399 acres). > Create 243 acres ofoak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination ofblue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees in the following SPA locations:
. Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat. . Preserve and passive open space zones tluoughout the SPA. . Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e. catch slopes).
. Other practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space. ' Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodland mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
> A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defined below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination ofacorns, seedlings, and various sizes of container trees (#1 container, #5 container, #15 container) or transplanted hees shall be incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acoms) shall have a minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
3A.3-s (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-21
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
. One established acorn equals one unit (acoms will be over planted to maximize potential germination). . One oak seedling equals one unit.
' One #1 container oak tree equals two units.
. One #5 container oak tree equals three units.
. One #15 container oaktree equals fourunits.
. One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
. One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh). . Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to augment overall habitat values. Each non oak tree species shall represent unit values described above for oak trees, but non oak species shall comprise no more than l0% ofthe mitigation plantings. > Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento and El Dorado Courties may be secured and placed under conseryation easement in lieu of onsite mitigation measures ifnecessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.
> Create oak woodlands offsite. Plant a combination ofblue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees at off-site location(s), ifneeded to achieve the creation goal of243 acres ofnew blue oak woodland habitat. This measwe would only be needed if243 acres ofblue oak woodland could not be created in the SPA. Off- site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation. Off-site tree planting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally support blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to project development. Planted areas shall be placed under conservation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity. > The oak woodland mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant(s) shall include a maintenance and monitoring program for any replacement trees. The program shall include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria. Replacement oak trees shal1 be maintained and monitored for a minimum of eight years from the date ofplanting and inigation shall be provided to planted trees for the fust five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80% suwival rate for planted trees by the end ofthe eight- year maintenance and monitoring period. Dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and suffrcient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department.

The security will be forfeited ifthe project applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and mooitoring and meet the success criteria.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Isolated Oak Tree lVlitigation
The project applicant(s) ofall on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated trees and the off-site Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S. 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; and the underground sewer force main shall develop a map depicting the tree canopy ofall oak trees in the survey area and identifying the acreage of tree canopy that would be preserved and the acreage that would be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak trees (those not located within the delineated boundary of oak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director. As a condition ofthe tree removal permit, project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement. The City's Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project applicants have developed a plan, as set forth Section 10 ofthe Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (attached to this EIR/EIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide compensatory mitigation for removal ofprotected trees in the SPA. ln addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the following elements shall be included in a protected tree mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and agreed upon by the City:
> Project applicant(s) ofprojects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered professional forester to perform a determinate survey oftree species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas ofthe project site proposed for tree removal and encroachment ofdevelopment. The condition of individual trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
. 5 = Excellent; No problems - tree has no structural problems, branches are properly spaced and tree characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.
. 4 = Good; No apparent problems - tree is in good condition and no apparent problems from visual inspection. Ifpotential structual or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and more serious health problems can be averted. . 3 = Fair; Minor problems - There are some minor stnrctural or health problems that pose no immediate danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist report are completed conectly the defect(s) can be minimized or eliminated.
. 2 = Poor; Major problems - the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with conect arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. If the recommended actions are completed correctly, hazard can be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. Ifno action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed. ' 1 = Hazardous or non conectable condition - the tree is in extremely poor condition and in non- reversible decline. This ratins is assiqned to a tree that has structural and/or health problems that no Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
amount oftree care work or effort can change. The issues may or may not be considered a dangerous situation. The tree may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an unacceptable risk of spreading the disease or pests(s) to other hees. . 0 = Dead - the tree has no significant signs of life (dead or very close to being dead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criteria
> The determination for whether an isolated hee shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the condition and size ofthe hee as follows:
. Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation. . Trees rated 2 may be removed at 50% of the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation. . Trees rated 3, 4, and/or 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation. . Native isolated oaks measuring 24 inches or greater dbh for a single trunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rated a 3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wal[) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading ofthe SPA properties.
' Native oaks measuring between I 2 and 24 inches dbh and rated a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom offooting to the top ofthe wall) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading ofthe SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated 2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (gteater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteria described here) would resuit. . Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 1 2 inches dbh shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to iave the hee(i) (greater than the cost ofimplementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteda described here) would result. ' Native oak trees measuring 1 inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated, included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated. a 3,4, or a 5. Credits shall only be accepted ifthe tree protection zone (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge ofthe tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater hees are protected on a construction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List. STPC shall not count ifthey the tree is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected tee to be preserved. The City shall accept the preservation of native oak trees in this size class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC crileria:
> Folsom Municipal Code requires one ofthe following be planted as compensation for each diameter inch of protected tree removed:

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Complianee was verified prior
to commencement ofgrading and
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
. half of a 24-inch box tree;
' one #15 container hee;
. two #5 container trees; or
. $150 inJieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution. > The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and inigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The plan shall incli.rde a 5-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acorns with an annual monitoring report that includes conections needed with proposed work plan, and notice ofcompliance within 90-days ofannual monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The security will be forfeited ifthe project applicant or designated responsible party fails to fulfrll the Planting and Maintenance Agreement.
> To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected trees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all affected project phases shall install high visibility fencing outside the outer edge of the drip lines of all trees to be retained on the SPA during project construction. The fencing may be installed around groups or stands of fiees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines of all trees are protected. Grading, henching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, inigation, and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines of protected trees). Ifthe activities listed cannot be avoided within the drip line ofa particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the tree in question shall be monitored for a period offive years and replaced only ifthe tree appears to be dead or dying within five years ofproject implementation.

Tkough a combination ofthe mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation ofblue oak woodland habitat in the open space areas, the project applicant(s) can satisfu the mitigation requirements for removal of hees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also - mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined thLrough consultation with the Sacramento County Planning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with Caltrans.

Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for Construction Employees.

Prior to beginning construction activities, the Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awaxeness training for construction employees. The training shall describe the importance of onsite biological resources, including special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests of special- status birds; and roosting habitat for special-status bats. The biologist shall also explain the importance of other responsibilities related to the protection ofwildlife during construction such as inspeclqg ppgqlre4qlg1 (Addendum)
ws-1106
-t',
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement ofgrading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on frle with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Califomia
Deparhnent of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, within
suitable tadpole
habitat.

Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gmbbing or
clearing, within
suitable
northwestem
pond turtle
habitat.
and looking under vehicles and machinery prior to moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or undet equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to briefthem on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biologicairesources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not cJmplying with biological mitigation requirements. Ifnew construction personnel are added to the project, ihe conhactor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before itarting work. An environmental awareness handout that describes and illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction ard identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provrded to each person.

Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualifred biologist to conduct a preconstmction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vemal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for westem spadefoot. Iflo westem spadefoot individuals are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. Ifwestem spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.

Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle Survey' The Project Applicant($ shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable habitat for northwestem pond turtle. Ifno northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction suwey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further rnitigation shall be required. If northwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity ofthe project.
ws-2
(Addendum)
tlwPT-1
(Addendum)
I06
-23
106
-24
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
Yes
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

On June 10,2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-constniction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Departrnent.

Califomia
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

During all
construction
phases
Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnibbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey,
The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the pmject site within i4 days prior to commencement ofconsfuction during the nesting season (1 February tlrough 3 1 August).

If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualifred biologist in consultation with CDFW. The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent ofthe nest, to be determined by a qualifted biologist. Once the young are independent ofthe nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-consfruction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside ofthe nesting season.

Comply with the ProEammatic Agreement.

The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identifring historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those adverse effects as required under Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the Califomia Office of Historic Preservarion 1725 23rd Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables and management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clear'ly reference the California Register ofHistorical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each individual development phase or off-site element, the applicable oversight agency (City ofFolsom, El Dorado County, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
> The project applicant shall retain tle services ofa qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identifr locations that are sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of tlB-1
(Addendum)
3A.Sla
(Addendum)
(Addendum)
345-1b
106
-25
106
26 106
a7
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
known resources, geomorphology, and topography. The inventory report shall specify the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate. > The identification ofany sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction ofeach individual development phase shall be performed in concert with monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.
> For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the services ofa qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation ofthe individual project development would result in damage or destruction of"significant" (under CEQA) cultural resources.

These findings shall be reviewed by the applicable agency for consistency with the significance tluesholds and heatment m€asures provided in this EIfuEIS. > Where possible, the project shall be configured or redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources. Altematively, these resources may be preserved in place ifpossible, as suggested under California Public Resources Code Section 2i083.2. Avoidance of historic properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800. > Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measues that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measues may consist of data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because ofthe data they contain (which may contribute to research). Altematively, for historical architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive, nanative, or photographic doc'umentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance tlresholds and standards provided in this EIR/EIS. > To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall prepare an appropriate prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate treatment.
> These steps and documents may be combined with the phasing ofmaragement and documents prepared pursuant to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesOn June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
ofEngineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirgments for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. Al1 required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department. Compliance
with this condition is monitored through
construction inspection.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
Before approval
ofgrading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
gnrbbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring If Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required,
To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following:
> Before the start ofground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity ofthe project APE, to educate them about the possibility of encountering buried cultural resources and inform them ofthe proper procedures should cultural resowces be encountered. > As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion ofthe SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with respect to monitoring. > Should any cultural resources, such as sffuctural feahues, unusual amounts ofbone or shell, artifacts, or architecfural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity ofthe find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who sha1l conduct a field investigation ofthe specific site and shall assess the significance ofthe find by evaluating the resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. If the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-la and 3A.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval ofrecommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Calhans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitivity haining program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for construction supervisors. The sensitivity training program shall provide information about notification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for coordination between construction persomel and monitoring personnel, and information about other treatment or issues that may arise ifcultural resources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocoi shall be communicated to all new construction oersonnel during orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible location inside the 3A"$2
(Addendum)
106
:28
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThere have been no human remarns
discovered during the course ofgrading
and construction in the project.

Sacramento
County
Coroner; Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
During all
ground
disturbing
activities, for
any project
phase.
constructionjob trailer. The phone number ofthe USACE culhual resources staffmember shall also be included.

The on-site sensitivity taining shall be canied out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor.

Ifunanticipated discoveries ofadditional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 0), are made during the construction ofthe project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
> The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, ifgiven the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius ofthe unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of Attachment G of the HPMP. The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, ifpresent, shall notifu the USACE within 24 hours ofthe discovery. > The USACE shall notifr the State Historic Preservation Offrcer (SHPO) within one working day of an unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim heatment measures in accordance with this HPTP.

Once the USACE makes a formal determination of eligibility for the resource, the USACE will notify the SHPO within 48 hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The SHPO shall respond within 72 hours of the request to consult. Failure ofthe SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the treatment measwes.

The project applicants shall be required to submit t0 the City proofofcompliance in the form ofa completed taining roster and copy ofhaining materials.

Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures
In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, ifhuman remains are uncovered dwing ground- disturbing activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area ofthe find and notiff the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature ofthe remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries ofhuman remains within 48 hours ofreceiving notice ofa discovery on private or public lands (Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5[b]). Ifthe coroner determines that the remains are those of a Nafive American, he or she must contact the NAHC by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner's findings are complete, the project applicant(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC- designated Most Likely Descendant shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for 3At3
(Addendum)
106
:29
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe owner/applicant
Ceotechnical Report City. The
subdivision is
has
to the
Geotechnicai report
on file with the City
for the
Geology and Soils
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
ground-
acting on notification of a discovery ofNative
the Califomia Public Resources Code.
training roster and copy oftraining materials.
human remains are 5097.9 of
Upon the discovery ofNative American remains, the procedures above regarding involvement ofthe applicable county toroner, notification ofthe NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be^followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensure that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cdtural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or distubed by further <levelopmint activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make recommendations. A range ofpossible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and analysis, preservation in piace, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other cuituraliy appropriate treatment. As suggested by AB 2641 (Chapter 863, Stanrtes of2006), the concerned pariies ruy .*t.nd dir.ussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. Ab 2641(e)includes a list of site protection measlues and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
> record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, > use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or > record a reinternment document with the county
The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native Am#caa human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface dishrbance ifthe NAHC is unable to identiff an Most Likely Descendant or ifthe Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site, The projlct applican(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to furthe; distuibance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation by ihe N,*tC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof ofcompliance in the form of a completed 3A.7-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-30
Resolution No. i0670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
Compliance wi*r this condition has
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.
condition has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
disturbing
activities-
Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
ground-
disturbing
activities.

Before the start
of construction
activities.
submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified below). The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make recommendations on the following:
> site preparation;
> soil bearing capacify;
> appropriate sources and types offiil;
> potential need for soil amendments;
> road, pavement, and parking areas;
> shucturalfoundations, includingretaining-walldesign;
> grading practices;
> soil conosion ofconcrete and steel;
> erosion/winterization;
> seismic ground shaking;
> liquefaction; and
> expansive/unstablesoils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions, and shall determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the version ofthe CBC that is applicable at the time building and grading permits are applied for. All recommendations contained in the final geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented by the project applicant(s) of each project phase. Special recommendations contained in the geotechnical engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before ionstruction begins. Design and construction of all new project development shall be in accordance with the CBC. The pmject applicant(s) shall provide for engineering inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with recommendations contained in the geot€chnical report.

Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement offill, and disposal ofmaterials removed from and deposited on both on- and off-site construction axeas.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Ei Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Implement the Grading and Erosion Control Plan. Before gtading permits are issued, the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase that would be located within the Ciy ofFolsom shall retain a Califomia Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department before issuance of gadqg 3A.7-lb
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.7-3 (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-31
106
-t2
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe Community Development
Department has reviewed and all
improvement plans in the subdivision to
verifu compliance with mitigation
measure.

Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Deparfinent
Before and
during
earthmoving
activities.
permits for all new deveiopment. The plan shall be consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance, the City's Hillside Development Guidelines, and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with deveiopment for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a Califomia Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion conhol plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills.

The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west ofPrairie City Road, the project applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a Califomia Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall be consistent with Sacramento County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location, implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment conhol measures, a description ofmeasures designed to control dust and stabilize the construction-site road and entrance, and a description ofthe location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use ofdetention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering of stockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion.

Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction ofretaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabilization ofconstruction entrances to minimize hackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source oftransportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-l (discussed in Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land") would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.

Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations. The project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist ofperforated pipe and gravel, sunounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infilfration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months away from building foundations. 3A.7-s (FPASP
ErwErs)
106
-33
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance wtth this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Community
Development
Department
City
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of smalllot
finai maps and
building
permits for all
discretionary
development
project
including all
on- and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
During
earthmoving
activities in the
Ione and
Mehrten
Formations.

To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particular discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures for reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use ofon-site equipment, worker commute trips, and truck trips canying materials and equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the makrials selected for construction (e.g., concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most current list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract with the selected primary conhactor. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development andsubmit to the
GHG Emissions.Implement Additional Measures to Control
that substantiatesa
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work
Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically imporlant paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
> Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the Ione or Mehrten Formations, the project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to tain all construction personnel involved with earthmoving activities, including the site superintendent, regarding the possibility of eniountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered. > Ifpaleontological resources are discovered during earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall immediately cease work in the vicinity ofthe find and notifz the appropriate lead agency (identified below), The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society ofVertebrate Paleontology guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Resources are Discovered,
3A.4-l (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.7-10
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and
106
--ti
-34
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
considered infeasible for construction of that particular development phase and/or at that point in time. The project construction.report, including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by the City, in consultation with SIvIAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction of each development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection of a primary contractor, this measure requfes that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD's recommended measures for reducing construction-related GHG emissions at the time of wdting this EIFIEIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
> Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
. reduce unnecessary idling (modify work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort); . perform equipment maintenance (inspections, detect failures early, conections); . train equipment operators in proper use of equipment; I use the proper size ofequipment for thejob; and
r use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, elechic drive trains). > Use alternative fuels for electricity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use electrical power.
> Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for consfuction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen [NOx] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.) Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB 2009b).
> Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction worker commutes.
> Reduce electricity use in the construction offrce by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more efficient ones. > Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and demolition debris (goal ofat least 75% by weight). > Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials lgoal ofat least 20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and curb materials). > Minimize the amount ofconcrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option. > Produce concrete on-site ifdetermined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
The owner/applicant worked with an
organization Urban Wood Rescue which
is a program in association with the
Sacramento Tree Foundation that makes
wood products flom large trees that are
removed as a result of development. The
owner/applicant provided most of the
large trees that were removed as a part of
the grading and construction for the
project to Urban Wood Rescue and they
made table, furniture, etc. from the trees
that were provided. The remaining trees
and tree canopy was mulched by the
owner/applicant and is stored on site to
use as mulch in the landscape areas
throughout the project. No removed trees
were transported to the landfill rn
accordance with this condition of
approval.

The subdivision is not within any
identified area where contaminated
groundwater is present. Therefore there
is no required Phase 1 or Phase 2
Environmental Assessment required.

City ofFoisom
Community
Development
Departnent
Hazards and llazardous Materials
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of final maps
and/or building
permits for all
project phases
requiring
discretionary
approval,
including all
on- and off-site
elements.

Before and
during earth
moving
activities
> Use EPA-certified SmartWay trucks for deliveries and equipment transport. Additional information about the SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is available from ARB's Heavy-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).
> Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist ofthe use of nonpotable water from a local source.

In addition to g![trQMD-recommended measures, construction activity shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.

Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The trees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary funding for urban and community forestry program (such as the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute [Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensue that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that ofali harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., fumiture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and i:nd an off-site tree program that includes a levei oftree planting that, at a minimum. increases carbon sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime. This program shall be funded by the project applicant(s) of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an independent Certified Arborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements ofMitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3, "Biological Resources - Land." Final approval ofthe program shall be provided by the City.

Components of the program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the City of Folsom would simultaneously mitigate the loss of oak woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The Califomia Urban Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008). All unused vegetation and tree material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative material should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant.

Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which Soil andor Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments and Implement Required Measures. The project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing for all areas ofthe SPA

34.4-2b
(FPASP
ErnyErs)
3A.8-2 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-36
106
-37
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThere are no overhead powerlines
existing within this subdivision and all
proposed and future utility lines to serve
this subdivision will be placed
Cify of Folsom
Community
At the
submission of
and
that
include, as necessary, analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potentiai contamination sites have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 3A.8-i) before construction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substances:
> Prepare a plan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off- site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution of clean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall include measures that ensure the safe transport, use, and disposal ofcontaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and treat the contaminated gtoundwater to remove contaminants before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The project applicant(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal ofhazardous materials removed from the site at an appropriate off-site disposal facility.
> Notify the appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies ifevidence ofpreviously undiscovered soil or groundwater contamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction activities. Any contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County Environmental Management Department, Central Vailey RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state, or local regulatory agencies. > Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD pertaining to the contents ofany existing pole- mounted transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall determine whether existing on-site electrical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is identified, the maintenance and/or disposal ofthe transformer shali be subject to the regulations ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority ofthe Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure, Potential purchasers ofresidential properties near the transmission lines shall be made aware of the controversy sunounding EMF exposwe. The Califomia Department of Real Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant's final Subdivision Public Reoort aonlication. which shall be provided to Durchasers ofproperties within 100 feet 3A.8-6 (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-38
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
underground in accordance with the
subdivision's conditions of approval.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
tentative map
applications.

Before issuance
ofgrading
permits for the
project water
features.
from the 100-1 l5kV power line , or within 150 feet from the 220-230 kV power line . The notification would include a discussion ofthe scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where backgound levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

Prepare and Implement a Vector Control Plan in Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District. To ensure that operation and design ofthe stormwater system, including multiple planned detention basins, is consistent with the recommendations ofthe Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control Distnct regarding mosquito control, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Vector Control Plan. This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the City for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the detention basins under the City's jurisdiction. For the off-site detention basin, the plan shall be submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control Dshict BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008). The plan shall include, but is not limited to. the following components:
> Description ofthe project.
> Description of detention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
> Goals of the plan.
> Description of the water management elements and features that would be implemented, including:
' BMPs that would implemented on-site;
. pubtic education and awareness;
' sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
. mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
. stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater Management Plan). > Long-term maintenance ofthe detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable conditions or maintenance by a homeowner's association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identifu and implement BMPs based on their potential effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could include, but are not limited to, the following:
3A.8-7 (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-39
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The MDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicanthas
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.
and Water Quality
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Submittal of the
State
Construction
General Permit
NOi and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development
and submittal of
any other
locally required
plans and
specifications
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all on-site
project phases
build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as practicable to discourage dense plant grouth; perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant densities to facilitate the ability ofmosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move throughout vegetated area; design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water. The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and seftling; coordinate cleaning of catch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operations; > enforce the prompt removal ofsilt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water quality;
> ifthe sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception ofthe inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area ofwater for mosquito egg- laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipes); and
> design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy dewatering ofthe unit ifnecessary (Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant(s) ofthe project phase containing the of-site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County). other appropriate plans shall identify and specifu:
> the use ofan effective combination ofrobust erosion and sediment control BMPs and construction techniques accepted by the local jurisdictions for use in the project area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoff and the release, mobilization, and exposure ofpollutants, including legacy sources ofmercury from projecfrelated construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences > the implementation of approved local plans, non-stomwater management controls, permanent post- construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities; 3A.9-r (FPASP

EIFI/EIS)
106
-40
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
City ofFolsom
Public Works
Department
and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

Before approval
ofgrading plans
and building
> the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other types ofmaterials used for equipment operation;
> spill prevention and contingency measures, including measures to prevent or ciean up spills ofhazardous waste and ofhazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
> personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP; and > the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation ofthe SWPPP. > Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and consfuctior/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not linited to, such measures as those listed below. > Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of construction. These measures may include silt fences, staked straw bales or wattles, sedimentisilt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation. > Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas dishrbed by construction by slowing runoffvelocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filhation and transpiration. > Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoffby conveying surface runoff down sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoff to a watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoffaccumulation at the base ofa grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and facility infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be maintained and available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Calhans shall coordinate with the development and implementation ofthe overall project SW?PP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries mustbe coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements Contained in Those Plans.

Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills. demonstratins that off-site upstream runoffwould be appropriately conveyed through the SPA, 3A.9-2 (FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-41
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
requires the implementation of BMP'S,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP;, which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/appiicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.
and that projectrelated on-site runoffwould be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical sfieam stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfi cation impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
> an accurate calculation ofpre-project and post-project runoffscenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runofl including increased surface runoff;
> runoffcalculations for the l0-year and 100-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as required) shall be performed and the tmnk drainage pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and detention facility locations finalized in the design phase; > a description ofthe proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system; > project-specific standards for installing drainage systems; > City and El Dorado County flood control design requirements and measures designed to comply with them;
Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range ofconditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain current stream geomorphology.

These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoffat the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept stormwater);
> enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics; > bioengineered sheam stabilization to minimize bank erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for enhancement ofripariar habitat and maintenance ofnatural hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions; > minimize slope differences between any stormwater or detention facility ouffall channel with the existing receiving channei gradient to reduce flow velocity; and > minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel and floodplain corridor, and utilize open bottom box culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado County Department of Transportation permits of all
project phases.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Contro'l Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SW?PP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has prepared storm
drain design reports and provided storm
drain calculations for all ofthe proposed
storm drainage features and
detentior/water quality and
hydromodifi cation basins necessary to
serve this subdivision. These reports
have been reviewed and approved by the
Community Development and Public
Works Departments.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Public Works
Department
Prepare plans
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all project
phases and off-
site elements
and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

AEP) flood flows be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures wtthin or down gradient ofthe SPA would not occur, and that hydromodification would not be increased from pre-development levels such that existing sheam geomorphology would be changed (the range of conditions should be calculated for each receiving water iffeasible, or a conservative estimate should be used, e.g., an Ep of I +10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with El Dorado County.

Develop rnd Implement a BMP and Water Quality Maintenance Plan, Before approval of the grading permits for any development project requiring a subdivision map, a detailed BMP and water quality maintenance plan shall be prepared by a qualified engineer retained by the project applicant(s) the development project. Drafts ofthe plan shall be submifted to the City ofFolsom and El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, for review and approval concunently with development oftentative subdivision maps for all project phases. The plan shall finalize the water quality improvements and further detail the structural and nonstructural BMPs proposed for the project. The plan shall include the elements described below.
> A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis ofproposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage design features.
> Predevelopment and post development calculations demonshating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and firnctional timing of storage and release pursuant to the "'Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Saffamento and South Placer Regions" (ISSQP 2007b1 per NPDES Permit No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0142, page 46) and El Dorado County's NPDES SWMP (County of El Dorado 2004).
> Source control programs to conhol water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization, prevention ofspills and illegal dumping, and effective management ofpublic hash collection areas.
> A pond management component forthe proposedbasins that shall include management and maintenance requirements for the design features and BMPs, and responsible parties for maintenance and funding. > LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but are not limited to:
' surface swales;
. replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement); . impervious surfaces disconnection; and
3A.9-3 (FPASP
ErwErs)
106
-42
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
There are no existing or proposed dams
upstream from this subdivision and
therefore there is no requirement to
perform the analysis required in this
condition ofapproval.

The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
thLrough construction inspection.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
and Vibration
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal to the
City oftentative
maps or
improvement
plans.

Before and
during
construction
activities on the
SPA and within
El Dorado
Hills.
. trees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shail be placed along the natual drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage patterns. The reduction in runoff as a result of the LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoffreduction credit system medrodology described in "stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4" (SSQP 2007b) and proposed detenfion basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoffvolumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its owa SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water' quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project appiicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans. of the City of Folsom Public Wotks Department.

Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors' To reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant(s) and their primary contractors for engineering design and construction of all project phases shall enswe that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year ofproject construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
> Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.

Monday through Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. > All constnrction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-sensitive land uses.
3A.94 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.11-l
(FPASP
EInvEIS)
-43
106
-44
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesBlasting has been necessary tluoughout
the course of grading and construction in
this subdivision. The blasting has not
been within 2000 feet ofany sensitive
receDtor. The blasting contractor has
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
bulldozing and
blasting
activities on the
All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction exhaust mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with manufacturets' recommendations. intake ard
Equipment
engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation. > All motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling. > Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead ofriveting, mixing concrete offsite instead ofon-site). > Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and generato$) as planned phases are built out and future noise sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to fuhre construction activities. > Written notification ofconstruction activities shal! be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet ofconstruction activities. Notification shali include anticipated dates and hours dwing which construction activities are anticipated to occur and csntact information, including a da1'time telephone number, for the project representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification. > To the extent feasible, acoustic baniers (e.g., lead curtains, sound barriers) shall be constructed to reduce consfuction-generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses. The barriers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site construction equipment.

When instatled properly, acoustic baniers can reduce construction noise levels by approximately 8-10 dB (EPA 1971).
> When future noise sensitive uses are within close proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise- attenuating buffers such as structures, truck tailers, or soil piles shall be located between noise sources and future residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise' > The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a construction noise management plan. This plan shall identify specific measures to ensure compliance with *re noise control measures specified above.

The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City ofFolsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Constmction shall not commence until the construction noise management plan is approved by the City of Folsom. Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of the applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries.

Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
> To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted within 275 feet ofexisting or future sensitive receptors.
3A.11-3
(FPASP
ErR/XrS)
106
45 Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
obtained a blasting permit from the City
and the Community Deveiopment
Department has verified compliance with
the permit tkough construction
inspection.

The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construclion inspection.

There are no sensitive receptors within
600 feet ofany on-going construction
and grading activity in the subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
SPA and within
El Dorado Hills
and the County
of Sacramento
Before
submittal of
improvement
plans for each
project phase,
and during
proj€ct
operations for
testing of
emergency
generators.

To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
> Ail blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of Califomia.
> A blasting plan, including estimates ofvibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to ttre commencement ofthe first blast.
> Each blast shall be monitored and documented for goundbourne noise and vibration le\rels at the nearest sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-Generated Stationary Sources.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following meaiures to reduce the effect ofnoise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:
> Routine testing and preventive maintenance ofemergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). All electrical generators shall be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers' specifications. > External mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate featues designed to reduce noise emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating generators within equipment rooms or enclosures frat incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment enclosues shall be oriented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby noise- sensitive receptors.
> Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m, to 10 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m to 7 a.m.]). Reduction ofparking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive iand uses, or using buildings and topographic feahres to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.
> Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 clB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction ofloading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as possible from noise sensitive land uses, constructing noise baniers hetween loadins docks and noise- 3A.lt-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-46
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
aCofOin
the
appropriate
phase of
developme
nt ofthe
project.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
aCofOin
the
appropriate
phase of
developme
nt ofthe
project.

The landscape and streetscape plans for
the subdivision include the required
masonry walls in the required height and
required locations. The Community
Development Deparhnent will monitor
compliance during construction and
veriff that the sound walls are complete
prior to issuance ofa Certificate of
Occupancy in the subdivision.

The Community Development
Department will monitor compliance
during construction and verifi *rat the
sound walls are complete prior to
issuance ofa Certificate ofOccupancy in
the subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
building
occupancy
Prior to
building
occupancy
sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise- sensitive land uses.

Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and consffuct noise baniers, as detailed below, to reduce traffic noise levels below the City ofFolsom exterior criteria of60 dB Ldn. > 6-foot tall solid noise baniers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway. > For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion ofthe project, a 7-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road. > For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase 1 and Phase 2 portions ofthe project, an 8-foot tall solid noise banier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise baniers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall barrier height may be achieved by utilizing a banier and earthen berm combination. Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use.

Barrier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of 117 -122 feet from the ultimate alignment of White Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White Rock Road improvements are firnded and moving forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services of a noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual properfy boundary setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measues to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City ofFolsom noise standards.

Interior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been implemented.
> For the first-row ofhomes located along White Rock Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor building facades shall maintain minimum window assembly STC ratings of 34. > Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall bc provided for all residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

4.13,1
(Addendum)

4.13-2
(Addendum)
106
-47
106
-48
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and
approved all traffic control plans
required for the construction of both
off-site and on-site improvements
for this subdivision to verifu
compliance with City ordinances and
to minimize delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site elements outside
the City timits for this subdivision.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifr adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Public Services
City ofFolsom
Public Works
Department
City ofFolsom
Fire
Department,
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of all
relevant plans
and/or permits
and during
construction of
all project
phases.

Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan, The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement traffrc contol plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way The traffic control plans must follow any applicable standards ofthe agency responsible for Measures typically used inthe affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. traffic control plans include advertising ofplanned lane closwes, warning signage, traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by emergency a flag person to direct
vehicles. During project
construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic controi plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County depaxtment or the Califomia Departrnent ofTransportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval of all project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic- Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable pro-ject phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties and Caltrans).

Incorporate California Fire Code; City ofFolsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval. To reduce impacts related to the provision of new fire services, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following, as described below.

1. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic sprinkler systems, the availability of adequate fire flow, and the locations ofhydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section I 7.57.080 ("Vehicular Access Requirements"). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and banicades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Baniers Standard, as required by the City ofFolsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for review and approval before the issuance ofbuilding permits.

In addition to the above measures, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall incorporate the provisions described below for the portion ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area, ifit is determined through City/El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 178-acre portion ofthe SPA. 3A.14-l
(FPASP
ErR/0rs)
3l\14-2
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-49
r06
-50
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifr adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

This subdivision pay share of
the following improvements with the
palment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision,
City ofFolsom
Fire
Department,
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
ofbuilding
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements For commercial development, improvement plans showing
on EDHFD fire prevention standards.
roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler
shall be submitted to the EDHFDsystems, fire alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements for revlew and approval. For residential development, improvement plans showing property lines and adjacent streets or roads; total acreage or square footage ofthe parcel; the footprint ofall structures; driveway plan views describing width, lengh, tumouts, turnarounds, radiuses, and surfaces; and driveway profi1e views showing the percent grade fiom the access road to the structure and vertical clearance shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits, kr addition, residential development requiring automation fue sprinklers shail submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a Califomia State Licensed C-16 Contractor.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy ofany struchues until the project applicant(s) have obtained a Certifrcate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Departrnent verifring that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction ofthe City ofFolsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre area ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area.

Incorporate into Project Designs. The of all project phases shall incorporate into their project designs
for those areas
fire flow requirements based on the Califomia Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, and/or EDHFD of the SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verif, to City ofFolsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval ofimprovement plans and issuance of occupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 1), To ensure thal the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection opemtes at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 1).
3A.14-3
(FPASP

EIWETS)
3A.15-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-51
106
-(t
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
buiiding permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Lnpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements witl tle
pal'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Deparhnent
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shail be
performed prior
to approval of
the fust
subdivision
map to
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair to Construction of Improvements ^t
the Siblev
StreeVBlue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensllle that the Sibley StreeVBlue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oflwo left-tum lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley StreeVBlue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Fund Construct Improvements to the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersection (Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West)'Ailhite Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffrc signal must be installed.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Intersection 4l). To ensure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane and two through lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo through lanes and one dedicated right-hrn lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements. 3A,15-1b
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-lc
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-1e
(FPASP
ErnuErs)
106
-53
106
-54
1'06
-55
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
palment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department and
Caltrans
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

Before project
build out.

Design of the
White Rock
Road widening
to four lanes,
from Grant Line
Road to Prairie
Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Middle Road Intersection (Intersection 44). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/l\4iddle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, conhol all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and constntct these improvements.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2), To enswe that the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including 'Jug handle" ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. 50/Hazei Avenue interchange is a mitigation measure for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a pro$am established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoadAilhite Rock Rord Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Intersection 3), Improvements must be made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The cunently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this ana$sis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line).

This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road 3A.15-1f
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A,15-1h
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-ri
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-56
106
-57
106
-58
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Irnpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County Public
Works
Departrnent
City Road, with
Intersection
improvements
has begun, and
because this
widening
project ls
environmentally
cleared and
tuily tunded,
it's construction
is expected to
be complete
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
phase two of
the Hazel
Avenue
widening, from
Madison
Avenue to
Crirragh Dowls
Drive, is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
to be the through movement. The improvements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right tum lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound right tum lanes, two westbound left turn lanes and two westbound through lanes. This improvement also includes the signalization ofthe White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road,tVhite Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3)' Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10). To ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS between Cunagh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part of the County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.
3A.1s-lj
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-59
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit in
the
subdivision
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

El Dorado
County
Department of
Transportation
complete. The
applicant shall
pay its
proportionate
share of funding
of
improvements
to the agency
responsible for
improvements,
based on a
pro$am
established by
that agency to
reduce the
impacts to
Hazel Avenue
between
Madison
Avenue and
Cunagh Downs
Drive
(Sacramento
Couty
Roadway
Segment 10).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
frst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
oroiect ohase
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock RoadAilindfield Way Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized and separate northbound left and dght turn lanes must be striped. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).
3A.15-11
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-60
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
nrior to
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF). Citv Traffic Impact Fees
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and the City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
Caihans
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
the Sacramento
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U'S. 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevrrd/U.S, 50 Eastbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an alternate parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel ioute. It is prefened to alleviate the congestion on U.S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end ofthis reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard,/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard,{J.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east ofFolsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project' Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16 Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist ofone left-turn lane and one shared through/rightturn lane. Protected left-tum signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, and are scheduled for Measure A funding,
Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova,
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of firnding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route l6 intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S, 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lane must be constructed. This improvement is currently planned as part ofthe Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and 3A.15-lo
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-1p
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-1q
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-61
106
-62
106
-63
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
wiil be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdrvision will pay its iair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Crty of Folsom
Cornmunity
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
altemative is
complete.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project has
started since the
writing of the
Draft EIS/EIR.

Befbre project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
shouid be built.

Community Enhancements Project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment r).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S, 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3), To enswe that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue aad Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). 3A.15-1r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-64
Resolution No. 10670
Pagell0of14l

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastmcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofRancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
and Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
deterrrine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 befiileen Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S,50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchaage project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a 3A.15-1s
(FPASP

EIRVEIS)
3A.15-1u
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-1v
(FPASP
ErwErs)
106
-65
106
-66
r06
-67
Resolution No. 10670
Page lli ofi41

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
palment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Inftastructue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
apploval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build oul A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1 8).

Participate tn Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on u.s. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Diverge (Freeway Diverge t. To ensllle that Eastbound U S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off-ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended ln the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.s. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane improvement ls included ln the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility improvements, as may beFee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the lmpacts to the U S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). 3A.15-1w
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-1x
(FPASP
ETRyEIS)
106
-68
106
-69
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l2 of 141

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastnrchue
Fees (SPIF), City Trafftc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
frst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at ar acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.
determined by a nexus
impacts to the U.S. 50
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the EastboundlPrairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate m Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkwav
Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie
Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8)' To ensure
"braided ramp"
that Eastbound U S, 50 operates al an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak implemented toAvenue Parkway off-ramp
eliminate the unacceptable
weave, an improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be
weaving conditions. Such an improvement may involve a
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Easdbound / Pralrie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave (Freeway Weave 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9), To ensure that Eastbormd U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility FJe Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9). 3A.15-ly
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-12
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A,15-1aa
(FPASP

EIWEIS)
r06
-70
106
-71
106
-72
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l3 of 141

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Plan Infrastructue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the foilowing improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be buiit.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbormd auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this fleeway segnent must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29). 3A.15-ldd
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1ee
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-tJ
I06
-74
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l4 of 141

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastnrchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic ImPact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pa1'rnent of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees coilected pdor to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 u.s. 50 Eastbound/Folsom
operates at an acceptable LOS
aI the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane ftom the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxliary lane improvement is-included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be iletermined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to dte U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).
3A.15-1ff
(FPASP

EIFUEIS)
3A.15-1gg
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-1hh
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-75
106
-76
106
-77
Resolution No. 10670
Pagell5ofl4l

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan lnfrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Counfy Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Deparftnent
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before approval
of improvement
plans for all
project phases
any particular
discretionary
development
application that
includes
residential and
commercial or
mixed-use
development.

As a condition
ofproject
aooroval and/or
Participate
Avenue Direct
acceptable LOS
diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement ls included ln the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay lts proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based
the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue direct
on a pro$am established by that agency to reduce the impacts to ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38)
Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction ofthe City Public Works Department. To firther minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial ienters shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume of single-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent oftravel by transtt. The project's faii-share participation and the associated timing ofthe improvements and service shall be identified in the project conditions of approval and/or the project's development agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT. 3A.15-1ii
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
3A.15-2a
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-78
106
-79
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l6 of l4l

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Trafiic knpact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan lnftastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transnortation fees collected prior to
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Concunent with
construction for
all project
phases.

Concunent with
construction for
all project
phases.

As a condition
ofproject
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
nrior to
Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development applicalion shall pay an appropriate amount into the City's existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.
roadways and intersections.

Pay Full Cost of Identilied Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program. In accordance with Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's transportation impact fee program to fully firnd improvements only required because ofthe Specific Plan.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Sibley StreeflBlue Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lane, trvo through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study 3A.15-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP
ErRyErs)
3A.15-3
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4a
(FPASP

EIRI/EIS)
106
-80
106
-81
r06
-82
106
-83
Resolution No. 10670
Page ll1 of 141

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Plan Infrastn"rcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
piol to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
or other reliable mechanism paid for by to the impacts to the Sibley StreeVBlue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). of Improvements to
Parkway/East (Folsom Intersection 6). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) oftwo left+urn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, andapproach must the westbound
through lanes,
be reconfigured to consist
(East Bidwell Stree0 approach must be reconfigured to conslst of two left tum lanes, four and a nght-turn lane. It 1S against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adj acent development; therefore, this improvement ls infeasible.

The Applicant
Street/College
Shall Pay a Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). To ensufe that the East Bidwell Street/College Street intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or
consist of one left-turn lane, one left-through lane,
better the westbound approach must be reconfigured to
and two dedicated right-turn lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of firnding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study orothel appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell Street/Nesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7)' 3A.15-4b
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-84
106
-85
Resolution No. 10670
Pagell8ofl4l

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
pal,rnent of Specific Plan Infrastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Courty Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Trafiic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be nerformed
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2l), To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /Iron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-tum lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized haffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road Intersection @olsom Intersection 23). To improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road intersgction, the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist ofone left-tum lane, one shared leftthrough lanes, and one righltum lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/lron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 24), To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / kon Point Road intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all ofthe following improvements are required:

The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist ofone left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a right tum lane. The westbound aooroach must be reconfisured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, one through lane, 3A.15-4d
(FPASP

EIWEIS)

3.d.15-4e
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-86
106
-87
106
-88
Resolution No. 10670
Page I l9 of 141

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchfe
Fees (SPIF), City Trafftc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County
Department of
Trarsportation.
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
appfoval ofth€
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
and a tkough-right northbound approach must be to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane.
lefltum lanes, three through lanes, and a
The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of a nexus study or other appropriate and reliablefunding of improvements, as may be determined by mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing
subdivision map to determine during which proj
Intersection 24).
analysis should be performed pnor to approval of the first built. (Folsomect phase the improvement should be
Applicant Shall Fund and Construct to the Oak Avenue Valley Parkway Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection
oftwo left-turn lanes,
these improvements.
operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist two through lanes, and two right-tum lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct Participate in Fair of Improvements to Reduce on the Grant Line RoadAilhite that the Grant Line Road/WhiteRock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3)' To ensure Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS E or better *ris intersection should be replaced by some type ofgrade separited intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sairament,o County's Proposed General Plan. Implementation of these improvements would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must bJimplemented by Sacramento County. The appiicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).
3A.15-4g
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.15-4i
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-89
106
-90
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Tlansportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan hfrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Countv Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must bL widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment' Participate in Fair Share Funding 0l Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento
Line Road belween Kiefer Boulevard
County Roadway Segment 8). To improve
operation on Grant Jackson Highway, this roadway segment could be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and laclson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. widened to six lanes. This improvement is
Cordova General Plans; however, it is not
proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be Participate in Fair Share Funding
Curragh Downs Drive and U.S,50
To improve operation on Hazel Avenue between Cunagh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50 westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento Countv's general plan because the county's policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes. of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13). 3A.rs-4j
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4k
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.t5-4t
(FPASP

EIWETS)
106
-91
106
-92
106
-93
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
pdor to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This pay share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
pnor to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.15afl. Improvements to impacted intersections on ttris segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and, therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The identifred improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because ofother development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing R0ad (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).
3A.15-4m
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4n
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
-94
106
-95
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will bs
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payrnent of Specific Pian Infrastnrcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Trafftc Impact Fees
and Sacramento Countv Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Departrnent of
Transportation.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
appoval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
to
farticipate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S' 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection l). To ensure that the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane, one shared left tlrough lane and thee dedicated righltum lanes. hnprovements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a piogram established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel AvenueIJ.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1).

Conidor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not'likely to be implemented by Caltans by 2030 3A.15-4o
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4p
(FPASP

EIRUEIS)
3A.I5-4q
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-96
106
-97
106
-98
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), Cify Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for rmprovements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Conidor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4t). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Calhans State Route 50 Coridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of fi.rnding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). 3A.15-4r
(FPASP
ErnuErs)
3A.15-4s
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-99
106
r00
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
subdivision will pay its
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastn.rchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastmcture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
fust subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
Segment 6).
in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. ensufe that Eastbound US 50 operates at an
should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that
mitigation measure 3A. i5-4u, and x), and
the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be imp'lemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimpiovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and r_eliable mechanism piid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate tn Funding of Improvements
to Oak Avenue
to on the U.s. 50 Eastbound
Prairie City Road Flyover On
To ensure that Eastbound US 50
ramp should start the eastbound
Ramp Parkway off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).
operates al an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and the southbound on should be
3A.15-4t
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-4u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
101
106
n2
t42
103
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
'subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
frrst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8), To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S.50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Sheet - Scott Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge inlo this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other apgopriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 27).
3A.15-4w
(FPASP

EINUEIS)
3A.15-4x
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
r04
106
105
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This condition will be satisfied prior to
issuance of the 546s buildirg permit in
the Phase 2 portion of the Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch Regency project in
accordance with previous conditions of
approval. The Phase 1 portion ofthe
Regency project cpnsists of 545 dwelling
units, The VTSM for the Phase 2 portion
of the Regency project has not yet been
approved by the City Council.

The Capital Southeast Connector -JPA
has executed a construction contract with
Goodfellow Brothers, Inc. to construct
the Capital Southeast Connector from
Prairie City Road to East Bidwell Street.

The construction contract \ryas executed
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at anCity Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35).

East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6), Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 ofthe Addendum:
> Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; > Southbound: one thru lane and one right tum lane in a 15O-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; > Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-tums from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and > Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left nrms to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be higgered as part ofthe entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signai at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell StreetMhite Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has progammed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell StreeVlVhite Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 of the Addendum provides a conceptual 3A.15-4y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

4.17-l
(Addendum)

4.17-Z
(Addendum)
106
106
106
7r7
106
r08
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
of
Occupancy
in the
subdivision
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
in December of 2020. Grading and
construction commenced in April 2021.

The project will include the relocation
and signalization ofthe existing White
Rock Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The owner/applicant will
pay the Sacramento County
Transportation Development Fee prior to
issuance of al1 building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the improvement plans for the
construction of these required
improvements including the plans for the
modification to the existing traffic signal
at the intersection ofEast Bidwe'll Street
and Mangini Parkway. These
improvements are currently under
construction.

The required improvements in this
condition have been completed and
accepted by the City. These
improvements were constructed as part
of the off-site improvements for the
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements,
with the
exception of the
second
nordrbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 2
building
pormits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry.

Figure 4-4 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation' East Bidwelt Sheet/Mangini Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-5 of the Addendum):
> Northbound: One left-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one dght- turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second thru iane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);
> Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- turn lane in a I 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
> Eastbound and westbound: One leffturn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper' Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50' East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconsfuct the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-6 ofthe Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared through-right lane with a 150-foot taper; > Soudrbound approach: One left turn lane in a 1 5O-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one tluough lane; > Westbound approach: One left tum lane in a 60-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one thnough lane;

4.17-3
(Addendum)

4.17-4
(Addendum)
I06
109
106
110
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit in
the
subdivision
Mangini Ranch Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

The Community Development
Department has approved the plans for
the reconstruction and signalization of
the East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek
Parkway intersection in accordance with
this condition.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
and one thru
southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
and the second
tbru southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.
> Southbound deparhre: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsignalized left tums to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Sheet is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part ofthe entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant conhibute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the pmject applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 ofthe Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper. > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240'foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes.

The second southbound ttrough lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way. > Westbound approach: One right turn lane, plus one left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions ofapproval from neighboring projects.

4.17-5
(Addendum)
106
111
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
Phase 3
subdivision
Yes
Yes
The Capital Southeast Connector-JPA
project is cunently under construction.

The Connector project will implement
and complete Option A in this condition.

The owner/applicant shall implement the
required improvements to the
intersection in compliance with this
condition prior to issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy in the Phase 3
portion of the project.

The Phase I Sanitary Sewer
inftasructure including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the Alder Creek
Parkway sewer lift station and forced
main to serve this subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA landowners and
have been completed and accepted by
the City and are cunently in operation.

The City obtained a
San which provides
letter
verification that
there is adequate capacity in the existing
Regional San conveyance and heatrnent
system to accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at buildout.

Confirmation from Regional San was
required because the Folsom Plan fuea
is served the San

4.17-6
(Addendum)
White Rock Avenue Parkway. Prior to project the project applicant shall implement Prior to issuance of
phase 3
building
permits
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
ttz
either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has proglammed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate anticipated U-Tums. Expand or construct a signalized intersection as follows:
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right tums. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a left{J-tum in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Westbound: A thru lane and a righttum in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U-turns. > Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right tums. The westbound right tum requires a 365-foot deceleration [ane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 of the Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Systems
106
113
3A.rG1
(FPASP

EIR/XIS)
of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and Implement Before approval of fural maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.
and Off-Site Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the Community Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
approval of the final map and lssuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proofto the City ofFolsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has 6een constructed or is ensured through payment ofthe City's facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40, "Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrastructrue and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate servlce to the project shall be ln place for the amount of development identified the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and tssuance of building permlts for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
Before approval
offinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as id"ntified by SRCSD. Approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount ofdevelopment identified in the tentative map.
3A.16-3
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
106
rt4
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 30 of 141

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Lift Station on Iron Point Road. The City
Sewer Lift Station and Forced Main
which connects to the Regional San Lift
Station has been accepted by the City
and is currently in operation.

The owner/applicant has constructed the
necessary infrastructffe to provide
potable water to the subdivision. The
potable Phase 1 water infrastructure for
the Folsom Plan Area has been reviewed,
approved and accepted by the City and is
currently in operation.

The off-site potable water infrastructure
to serve the subdivision has been
reviewed, approved and accepted by the
Crty and is cunently in operation. In
addition, the City has verified that the
off-site potable water infrastructure is
adequate to serve the subdivision.

This condition is not applicable to this
subdivision. The water supply for this
subdivision is provided by the City of
Folsom Water Treatrnent Plant rather
than an Off-Site Water Treatment Plant
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
Before approval
offinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases,
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability, a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval ofany small-lot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation ofeach final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applican(s) ofthat project phase or activity shall demonsfrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the hnal subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and improvements will be in place pnor to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off'Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proofto the City ofFolsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the proj ect shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final subdivision map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfacfion ofthe City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected), If an off-site water treatment plant (WTP) altemative is selected (as opposed to the on- site WTP altemative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval ofthe final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water toeatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuildine permits for all proiect phases. A certificate ofoccupancy shall not be 3A.18-1
(FPASP

EIRYEIS)
3A.18-2a
(FPASP

EINYEIS)
3A.I8-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
115
106
176
106
lt1
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfred
pdor to
approval of
a future
TMP
The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Departrnent will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City
Additional Measures
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval offirst
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways drat
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

Highway 50.
issued for any building within the SPA until the water heatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City ofFolsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input ofthe City of Folsom, the City ofRancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When tle County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share firnding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts ofannual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quany project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itselfa "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction ofthe City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation ofas-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation ofthe precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic though the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its audrority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or haffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk ofcancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no morcthan296 in one million (SMAOMD 2009.

Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure AIR-
1-Land
(FPASP
ErR/f,IS)
106
118
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

March. Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Yercion2.2:7), or such different tkeshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applican(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quary truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation shategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City ofFolsom and funded by the truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides ofroadway segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. Each project- level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project-level analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel trucks), and emission rates representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk determined by in the HRA exceeds 296 in one million (or a different theshold of significance recommended by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor- If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
. Implement tiered hee planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the dispersion and filtration ofmobile-source TACs associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the hees reach maturitv. which breaks the line of sight Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
approval of
a futrue
TMP.

The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval offirst
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry kucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

50. between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes. These trees should be planted before occupation ofany affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance of the construction ofpotentially affected receptors to allow the hees to become established and progress toward mahrity. The life ofthese trees should be maintained through the duration ofthe quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s).
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
. equip all affected residences and school buildings developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle Anesting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air intake points to the interior rooms; . use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from roadway air pollution sources as possible; and . develop and implement an ongoing education and maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part ofthe Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry kucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, rvith the input ofthe City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quany project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility oftruck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the SPA and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts ofannual aggegate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption ofa TMP. The City's authority to conhol the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the apDroval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-I-Land
(FPASP

EINYEIS)
106
119
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City ofFolsom considers itselfa "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in drat it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City.

In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry fuck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from fuck haffic would be less than significant.

As an altemative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP w'ithin the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quany project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive receptors to noise generated by quarry truck faffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of 3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above.

The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City ofFolsom to discuss mitigation sfrategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, pro.ject-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City ofFolsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides ofroadway segments that are identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted using an approved tkee dimensional traffic noise modeling program (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan), Each projecr level analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City ofFolsom for the purpose ofdisclosure to the public and decision makers. The projecllevel analysis should account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the vear 2030 (includins the Dercentase ofheaw trucks). Ifthe incremental Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

The FPA landowners have satisfied a'll of
the mitigation measures for the design
and construction of the Phase 1 Water
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
increase in haffrc noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold ofsignificance recommended by the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
> Model the benefits ofsoundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected receptors not to exceed a total height of eight feet (two-foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffrc noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of rubberized asphalt at the expense ofthe quarry huck applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s). > Implement the installation ofrubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive receptors that carry quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of traffic noise levels. The inclusion ofrubberized asphalt would provide an additional 3 to 5 dB oftraffic noise reduction. The cost ofconstruction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by the quarry fuck applicant(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quany trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
> To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
. Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed construction plans ofresidences adjacent to affected roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of45 dB Ldn without quarry fucks. . Determine the interior quarry truck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck applican(s) should pay for the cost of window package upgrades (increased sound trarsmission class rated windows) required to achieve the interior noise level standard of45 dB Ldn with the inclusion ofquarry truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specifrc Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet ofany residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Infrastructure and Off-Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructure and off-site water facility altemative improvements. The project applicant shall N/A106
120
Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
and Sewer Backbone Infrastructure to
serve the first of development in the
FPA. The Phase I backbone
Infrastructure was completed and
accepted by the City in 2018 and is
cunently in use in the FPA and being
owned and operated by the City. The off-
site water facility alternative
improvements were not implemented.

The water for the FPA was provided
through the conservation of existing
water in the City. The new water supply
altemative was validated in 2014.

Department and
City ofFolsom
Public Work
Department
building
permits for any
project phase,
the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to
the City's
satisfaction the
fair share
contribution
towards
implementation
ofBackbone
Infrastructure
and Off-Site
Water Facility
improvements
and associated
required
mitigation as
identified in the
Folson South of
U.S. Highway
50 Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated
Negative
Declaration
(December
2014) or the
Revised
Proposed Off
Site Water
Facility
Alternative
Addendum to
the FPASP

EIR/EIS
coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Folsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 20i4): - > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-1: Design above ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-1: Prepare and Implement NOX Reduction Plan > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2: Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, ifnecessary, Prepare and implement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure fV-1: Conduct Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vemal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhom Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-4: Westem Spadefoot Toad > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Westem Pond Turtle > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's Hawk Nesting Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foraging Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-7: Tricolored Blackbird > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting Raptors > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status Bats > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement Section 1602 Master Slreambed Alteration Ageement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-13: Conduct Surveys to IdentiS and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section 401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Waters of the Stat€ Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
(approved
December
2012); as
applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-15: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Pian, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Inpacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure [V-1 1: American Badger > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with the applicable procedwes in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property heatment plans > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required Stop Work if Culnral Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-l: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activifies. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Conhol Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure M-5(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan for the detention basin West ofPrairie City Road. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VII-I: Greenhouse Gas Emissions > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVI-1: Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3: North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V14 North of U.S. Highway 50 Wato Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measwe XI-l North of U.S. Highway 50 Water hnprovements In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the,Revked Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative Addendun to the FPASP EIPJEIS (approved December I l. 2012):
> 38.1-2a: Enhance Exterior Appearance ofStructural Facilities.

Resolution No. 10670
Page I 38 of 14 I

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
> 38.1-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 38.1-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 38.1-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
> 3B.2-1a: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX Reduction P1an. > 3B.2-lc: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Progam during Construction.
> 3F..2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors. > 38.2-3b: Conduct Projecllevel DPM Screening and Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to Acceptable Concentrations.
> 3B.4-la: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during Construction. > 3B.4-1b Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water Facilities Climate Action Plan. > 3A.5-la: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 3A.5-1b: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation ofCultural Resources for the Califomia Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Carmot be Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring ifRequired, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> 34.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with Califomia Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 3B.7-la: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement Required Measures.
> 3B.7-lb: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency Measures Into Final Pipeline Design. > 3B..74: Implement Conosion Protection Measures.
> 38.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work ifPaleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
> 38.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 3B.8-1b: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials Management Plan. > 3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.

Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
esThe Capital Southeast Connector - JPA
project commenced construction in April
2021. Since the project is now complete
this condition has been satisfied.
cD (E)M
> 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 3B.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible Materials. > 3B.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. > 3B.9-ia: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. > 3B.9-lb: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. > 38.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for Struchral Facilities' > 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision ofSufficient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment. > 38.l 1-l a: Limit Construction Hours.
> 38.11-1b: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging. > 3B.11-1c: Maximize the Use of Noise Baniers.
> 38.1 1 -1 d: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction' > 38.11-1e: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints. > 38.11-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization Measures. > 38.12-1: Provide for Continued Recreational Access as ldentified in Mitigation Measure 3.14-1a. > 3B.15-la: Prepare Traffic Control Plan.
> 38.15-1b: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions. > 3B.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert. > 3B.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
> 38.17-1a: Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practices. > 38.17-1b: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program. > 3A.18-1 : Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. > 3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. lVhite Rock Road Shoulder Improvements
The owner/applicant shall construct shoulder improvements along the project's entire frontage of westbound White Rock Road to the satisfaction of the City prior to approval of the first small lot final map. In lieu of constructing the aforementioned interim shoulder improvements, the owner/applicant may enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and post

20. Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

YesThe Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the Phase 3A subdivision improvements
plans and all ofthe e:risting oak trees
that are required to be preserved are
currently in place and have been
protected during grading and
construction which commenced in the
fallof 2021. The Community
Development Department has allowed
various revisions to the City
development standards to further
enlance the preservation of the existing
oak trees.
cD (E) (P)
cD (E) (P)
M
M
adequate security to the City's satisfaction to ensure construction of said improvements; the secwity shall be for a minimum period of i0 years.

If shoulder improvements are constructed and/or funded by the owner/applicant, then said costs may be included in any applicable fee program established and approved for the Folsom Plan Area subject to approval by the City and the actual costs expended by the owner/-applicant may therefore be eligible for a credit and/or reimbursement.

Ifconstruction ofthe Capital Southeast Connector Project between Scott Road and the El Dorado County line has commenced during the term of the required Subdivision Improvement Agreement, then the shoulder improvement condition will be deemed satisfied and the security shall be released to the owner/applicant.

The owner/applicant shall preserve the oak trees shown in the blue color on the attached Site Plan Exhibit for the Traditional Subdivision. The owneriapplicant shall also make every attempt to preserve the tree shown in red on the attached Site Plan Exhibit provided that the City Arborist concurs(sincethisoaktreewillbeapproximately3'lowerthanadjacentpadgrades). The additional land created from elimination of lots 49, 56, and 5'7 as shown on the Site Plan Exhibit shall be incorporated into the adjacent residential lots to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Department. Consistent with FPASP Policy 10.19, the Cornmunity Development Director will allow modifications to the development standards to order to accommodate preservation of the oak tree on Lot 62 as shown on the attached Site Plan Exhibit. This condition shall be satisfied prior to approval ofthe Final Map for ttre Traditional Subdivision.

21. Resolution No. 10670

12/13/2022 Item No.18.

This page intentionolly left blonk
to facilitate double- sided printing .

FOLSOM

CITY OF
DISTINC!!VE BY I{ATUFE

12/13/2022 Item No.18.
r!.'ri..r, 1 ..i: ! ] it'1.
r:r,:1,,i.*i:i ai ..t f: t;
Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 10966 - A Resolution Accepting the AB1600 Development Fees Annual Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Following the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, many cities began charging fees on new development to fund public improvements and services such as streets, transit facilities, sewers, and storm drains. These fees are commonly known as development impact fees. In order to ensure that these fees were spent in a timely manner and on projects for which they were being collected, the State Legislature passed a bill known as AB 1600 (Mitigation Fee Act). This bill applies to developer fees, increased, or imposed on or after January 1, 1989.

AB 1600 enacts Govemment Code Sections 66000-66008 that generally contain four requirements:

I A local jurisdiction must follow the process set forth in the bill and make certain determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees, and establish a "nexus" or connection between a development project or class of project and the public improvement being financed with the fee.

The fee revenue must be segregated from the general fund in order to avoid commingling of public improvement fees and the general fund.

2. I
MEETING DATE: t211312022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10966 - A Resolution Accepting the AB1600 Development Fees Annual Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30,2022
F'ROM: Finance Department

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a developer fee for five years or more and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money. In addition, an annual report must be made of fees collected, interest earned, projects on which fees were expended, and any transfers or loans from the fee account. This report is to be reviewed by the local agency assessing the fees.

4. If a local jurisdiction cannot make the findings required under paragraph 3, the city or county must refund the fees collected.

The attached report provides the information required by Government Code for the development fees that fall under this disclosure requirement. In some instances, the ending fund balance amount is less than the remaining appropriation because outstanding advances and loans are not included in the fund balance. Cash balances are sufficient for the remaining appropriations. No refunds have been made nor are any required. More information on these funds and all other capital project funds is available in the annual budget adopted by Council in June 2022 and in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR).

This report was compiled with the unaudited City financial records. The audited ACFR will be available at the end of the current calendar year.

This report has been on file with the City Clerk's office as of November 28,2022

POLICY / RULE
Policy 1 1.6 of the General Plan states:

It is the Policy of the City of Folsom to require new development to bear the cost of its increased demand/ffict on municipal services and facilities so as not to create a greater burden on existing residents. Development contributes to the need for the expansion and extension of the City's circulation, weter, sewer, storm drainoge, and parks systems and other capital improvements, facilities, and equipment to adequately serve the development area. Service expansion and extension is not necessarily site- specific; rather, it is generally related to a larger area and the City as a whole. In order to accommodate the new development, maintain an acceptable level of service, and alleviate the effects of the increased demand on City services, it is the policy of the City of Folsom to require certain necessary improvements as a part of the development and/or the payment of municipal services and facilities fees consistent with the proportional effect of the development on such services. . .

ANALYSIS
For fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 development impact fee funds for all revenues totaled $42,631,390. Of the $42.63 million, 523,658,118 are impact fees, the remaining $18,973,272 J
2 Page 660
12/13/2022 Item No.19.
are grants, reimbursements, interest, and miscellaneous revenue. Expenditures totaled $2r,644,72r.

Upon review, it is determined that all fees have been spent or commiffed within 5 years of receipt, and thus no refunds are required.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10966 - A Resolution Accepting the ,4.81600 Development Fees Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2022

2. The Development Fees Annual Report for the City of Folsom for the Fiscal Year Ended hne30,2022
Submitted,
Tamagni, Finance Director
J Page 661
12/13/2022 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 1

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

RESOLUTION NO. 10966
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE A81600 DEVELOPMENT FEES ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FTSCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2022
WHEREAS, Policy ll.6 of the General Plan requires new development to bear the cost of its increased demand/effect on municipal services and facilities so as not to create a greatet burden on existing residents; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom has imposed and collected the Development Impact Fees based upon several adopted Nexus Reports that were completed in accordance with Government Code Section 66000, et. al.; and
WHEREAS, Section 66006(b) 2 of the Government Code of the State of California mandates that the "local agency shall review the information (concerning local agency improvement fees) made available to the public...at the next regularly scheduled public meeting..." NOW, THEREF'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby accepts the Development Fees Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2022 on file in the City Clerk's office.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13ft day of December 2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s)
ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10966
Page I of I Page 663
12/13/2022 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 2

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Development lmpact
Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2022
City of Folsom

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Table of Contents
lntroduction
Housing Trust Fee Fund.

Humbug Willow Creek Trails Fee Fund
Supplemental Park Fee Fund.

City-Wide Park lmprovement Fee Fund
Police Capital Fee Fund..

Fire Capital Fee Fund
General Capital Fee Fund..

Transportation lmprovement Fee Fund
Drainage Capital Fee Fund
Light Rail lmpact Fee Fund
General Park Equipment Fee Fund.................

Water lmpact Fee Fund
Water Capital lmprovement Fee Fund ..............

Sewer Capital lmprovement Fee Fund..............

Facilities Augmentation Critical Fee Fund
Facilities Augmentation General Fee Fund .......

Solid Waste Capital lmprovement Fee Fund.....

Folsom Plan Area Highway 50 lmprovements Fee Fund
Folsom Plan Area Highway 50 lnterchange Fee Fund
1 2
4 6
8 11
.. 13
.. 15
Folsom
Folsom
Folsom
Folsom
Plan Area Transit lmpact Fee Fund
Plan Area Corporation Yard Fee Fund......

Plan Area Specific Plan Capital Fee Fund.

Plan Area Solid Waste Capital Fee Fund ..
17 21
24 26
28 31
34 36
38 40
42 44
46 48
50 52

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Annual Report
Development lmpact Fees
For the City of Folsom
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Government Code Section 66006 requires local agencies to submit annual and five year reports detailing the status of development impact fees. The annual report must be made available to the public and presented to the public agency (City Council) at least fifteen days after it is made available to the public.

This report summarizes the following information for each of the development fee programs:

1. A brief description of the fee program.

2. Schedule offees.

3. Beginning and ending balances of the fee program.

4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned.

5. Disbursement information, including operating transfers

ANALYSIS
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 all fund revenues totaled $42,631,390.44 while expenditures totaled $21,644,721.47.

The table below summarizes, by program, the impact fees collected in FY 2021-22.

Fiscal Year End
June 30, 2022
Housing Trust Fund
Humbug-Willow Creek Fee
Supplemental Park Fee
Park lmprovements -
Police Capital
Fire Capital
General Capital
Transportation I mprovement
Drainage Capital lmprovement
Light Rail Transportation
General Park Equip Cap
Water lmpact Fee
Water Capital lmprovement
Sewer Capital
Facilities Augmentation Critical
Facilities Augmentation General
Solid Waste Capital
FPA Highway 50 lmprovement
FPA Highway 50 lnterchang'e
FPA Transit lmpact
FPA Corporation Yard
FPA Specific Plan Capital
FPA Solid Waste Capital
36,080.00
42,365.25
1,010,323.14
169,303.39
247,786.75
365,1 19.50
1,323,715.96
265,676.35
121,968.50
112,358.25
127,619.23
363,450.25
58,693.50
96,108.00
't,273,362.00
2,589,411.00
1 ,315,01 1 .00
840,618.00
12,818,590.00
480,558.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1 Total lmpact Fees Collected $ 23,658,118.07

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

City of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Compliance 2022
Housing Trust
Fund221
Section 3.90.010 of the Folsom Municipal Code establishes the provision for collection of a Housing Trust Fund impact fee. The housing trust fund is intended to be utilized with other sources of funding including, but not limited to, fee deferrals, fee waivers, federal tax credits, tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds, community development block grants, and HOME funds. The purpose of this fee is to further the policies, goals and programs of the housing element of the City's general plan and to help facilitate the development of affordable housing within the City.

Monies in the housing trust fund shall be used to promote the goals and policies of the housing element of the general plan; to implement any housing assistance plan, program, or guidelines adopted by the City Council; and to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to low and very low income households, with priority given to residential projects which include very low income units, as well as other housing related purposes. Housing trust funds may be used for loans, grants, equity participation or other funding mechanisms to accomplish these purposes. The housing trust fund may be used to cover reasonable administrative, legal, consulting, or other housing related expenses, which are not reimbursed to the City through processing fees.

HOUSING TRUST FUND FEE SCHEDULE
Use Category
Fee per Gross
Square Foot
Office
Retail
Light lndustrial
Heavy I ndustrial/Manufacturing
Light lndustrial/Manufacturing
StatementofRevenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 2017t18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019t20 FY 2020t2',1 FY 202'il22 76 76
76 76
tb
1 1
1 1
1 Revenues
Fees
Interest
Other Revenues
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB 1600 Expenditures
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End ofYear
1 Loan Receivable
Available Fund Balance
$ e2,230 $
$ $ $61,088
14,628
53,712
21 ,476
15,000
175,956
41 ,916
6,000
11,443
27,568
36,080
21,916
$ $
27 745 6 000
$ 103,462 $ 90,188 $ 223,872 $ 45,011 $ 57,996
500
11,405
3,771
4,067
2,222 956
475
1,954
$ $ 1,310 $
2 $ 94,730
$ 8,732
$ 1,805,096
$ 15,176
$ 75,012
$ 1 ,813,828
$ 6,289
$ 217,583
$ 1,888,839
$ 3,266
$ 41,745
$ 2,106,422
2,429
55,567
't48,167
$
$
$2,
$ 1,813,828 $ 1,888,839 $ 2,106,422 $ 2,148,167 $ 2,203,734 $ 849,683 $ 849,683 $ 841,289 $ 841,289 $ r '10
$ 964,145
Notes:
1 Loan Receivable are loans issued for development of affordable housing projects. 2 l_1,03s,159_ $ 1,265,132 $ 1,306,877 $ 377.324

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Housing Trust
Five Year Revenue Tcst Using First In First Out Method
Available Revenue Current Year $ 103,462 $ 90,188 $ 223,872 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds) 279,328 103,462 90,188 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds) 318,662 279,328 103,462 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds) 262,693 318,662 279,328 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (s-yr Old Funds) - 247,5'16 318,662 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (6-yrs and beyond) 249,620 $ 45,011
223,872
90,188
103,462
279,328
565,01 6
57,996
45,01 1
223,872
50,445
Total Revenue Available
Notes:

During FY 2021-22 $1,000,000 was used to provide funding for a low-income housing project.

Capital lmprovement Projects
Project
Amount
Expended
$ 964,145 $ 1,039,156 $ 1,265,132 $ 1,306,877 $ 377,324 FY 2021-22 Projects
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
Operations
Adm inistrative Overhead (interfu nd transfer)
FY2020-21 Projects
Operations
Adm inistrative Overhead (interfu nd transfer)
$ 475
1,954
$ 2,429
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 475
954
$ 2,429
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
100%
100o/o
$
$ '1,310

1.956
100o/o
100o/o
't ,310
1,956
$ $
$ 3,266
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 3,266 $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
ExpendituresFY 2019-20 Proiects
Operations
Administrative Overhead (interfu nd transfer)
$ 4,067
2 .222
100%
100o/o
4,067
2,222
$ $
$ 6,289
Project
Amount
Expended
$ 6,28e $
FY 201 8-1 9 Projects
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 11,405
3,771
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
Operations
Administrative Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 201 7-l 8 Projects
Operations
Administrative Overhead (interfu nd transfer)
$ 11,405
3,771
100%
100%
$
$ 15,176
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 15,176 $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 92,230
2,500
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$-$ 92,230
2,500
100%
100%
$ 94,730
Notes:1 lnterfund transfers are used lo reimburse the General Fund for providing General Government support. 3 $ 94,730 $

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

City of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Gompliance 2022
Humbug-Willow Greek Fee
Fund 223
Section 4.12.010 of the Folsom Municipal Code establishes the provision for collection of a Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway .impact fee. The Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway fund is intended to be utilized with other sources of funding including, but not limited to, the residential construction tax, capital improvement-new construction service charge, drainage fees, Quimby Act fees, major road fees and park lmprovement Fee. The purpose of this fee is to further the long-range planning efforts of the General Plan to develop the Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway.

New development, and the expansion of existing development within the city, generates the need for financing the planning and construction of recreational trail, and passive recreational amenities along the Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway.

HUMBUG.WILLOW CREEK FUND FEE SCHEDULE
Use Gategory Basis Fee Amount
Residential, Single Family
Residential, Multiple Family
Mobile Dwellings
Commercial/lndustrial Development
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Sq. Ft.
276
174
151

0.0670
$
$
$
$
Statementof Revenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 2017115 FY 2018/19 FY 2019t20 FY 2020121 FY 2021122 Revenues
Fees
lnterest
Grant Reimbursements
Other Revenues
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB 1600 Expenditures
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End ofYear
Available Fund Balance
Humbug-Willow Creek Fee Fund
Available Revenue Current Year
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (5-yrs and beyond)
Available Revenue Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years
Total Revenue Available
$ 146,538
229
2,590,416 2,402,241
244,493
68J23
123,785
40,000
74,160
$ 42,365
985,000
80 $ 107,206 $ 81 ,891 $ 17,265
40 063
$ 2,777,246 $ 2,753,940 $ 273,799 $ 131,424 $ 1,027,445 $ 2,452,183 $$$$ 2,678,645
106,013
544,809
69,653
30,308
79,472
30,202
18,637
$ 2,452,183
$ 325,063
$ (1,118,872)
$ (7e3,80e)
_$ (?e3,8oel
$ 2,784,658
$ (30,718)
$ (7e3,80e)
$ 614,462
$ (340,664)
$ (824,527\
$ 109,780
$ 21,644
$ (1,165,1e1)
$ 48,839
$ 978,606
$ (1,143,546)
_$ (824,5nL
$ (824,527)
$ (1,165,191) $ (1,143,546) $ (164,940)
$ (1,165,1s1) $ (1,143,546) $ (164,940)
Five Year Revenue Test Using Flrst ln First Out Method
$-$-$ s$
$ $$$
4 Result: Five Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Gapital lmprovement Projects
FY 2021-22 Projects
Placerville Rail Trail
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2020-21
Placerville Rail Trail
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2019-20
Oak Parkway
Placerville Rail Trail
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2018-19 Projects
Folsom Lake Trail Phase 2
Lake Natoma Class 1 Trail
Lake Natoma Water Front Trail
Oak Parkway Trail Undercrossing
Placerville Rail Trail
General Governmeni Overhead (interfund transfer)
Project
Amount
Expended
$ 30,202
18,637
$ 48,839
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$10}o/o $
1OjYo
30,202
18,637
$ 30,308
79,472
$ 109,780
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 48,83e $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 30,308 $
79,472
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
100o/o
100%
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 109,780 $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 626,'199
10,235
69,653
$ 706,087
85% $
100%
1000
$ e1,625534,574
10,235
69,653
$ 614,462 $ 91,62s
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 4,s15
868,568
48,500
1,728,829
28,233
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Expenditures
$ 4,515
37,215
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
jYo
1O0Yo
100%
98Yo
100%
1O0o/o
$
868,568
48,500
1,691,614
28,233
106,013
$ 2,636,915 $ 41,730
106 013
$ 2,784,658
FY 2017-18 Projects
Project
Amount
Expended
Folsom Lake Trail Phase 2
Lake Natoma Class 1 Trail
Oak Parkway Trail Undercrossing
Placerville Rail Trail
$ 2,499,395
Noies:
1 lnterfund transfers are used to reimburse the General Fund for providing General Government support. $ 1,984,345
329,1 60
61,878
124,012
e8% $
100Yo
100o/o
100o/o
1,937,133
329,160
61,878
124,012
47,212
$ 2,452,183 $ 47,212
5

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Gity of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Compliance 2022
Supplemental Park Fee
Fund 41 1
Section 4.10.010 of the Folsom Municipal Code establishes the provision for collection of a Park lmprovement impact fee. The fee established by this chapter is in addition to any other fees or charges, or taxes, required by law or city code as a condition of development, including, but not limited io, the residential construction tax levied by Chapter 17.90, capital improvement-new conshuction service charge levied by Chapter 17.92, drainage fees levied by Chapter 17.95, Quimby Act fees levied by Chapter 16.32 and major road fees levied by Chapter 12.04.The fee established by this chapter is to be collected for park and recreation facilities for which an account shall be established and funds appropriated, and for which a proposed construction schedule shall be adopted. The fee imposed by this chapter is necessary in order io assure compliance with the applicable general plan requirements that new development bear the cost for park and recreation infrastructure which is needed to serve such development.

SUPPLEMENTAL PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND FEE SCHEDULE
This fee is no longer charged
Statement of Revenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 7l',la FY 2018/19 FY 2019120 FY 2020121 FY 2021122 Revenues
Fees
lnterest
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB 1600 Expenditures
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End of Year
Available Fund Balance
$ $ $ $
3,938 5,912 5,703 3,276 2,508
$ 3,e38 $ 5,912 $ 5,703 $ 3,276 $ 2,508
$ $
435
$
$$$
$
$ 3,938
$ 265,525
$ 269,463
$
$ 5,912
$ 269,463
435
5,268
275,375
$
$ 3,276
$ 280,643
$
$ 2,508
$ 283,919
$
$
$
$ 275.375 $ 280,643 $ 283,919 $ 286,427
$ 286,427$ 269,463 $ 275,375 $ 280,643 $ 283.919
Five Year Revenue Test Using First ln First Out Method
Available Revenue current Year
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (s-yrs and beyond)
Available Revenue Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years
$ 3,938
3p62
10,491
152,078
96,263
2,731
5,9't2
3,938
3,962
10,491
152,078
98,994 1
5,703
5,912
3,938
3,962
10,491
250,637
3,276
5,703
5,912
3,938
3,962
261,128
2,508
3,276
5,703
5,912
3,938
265,090
$ $
$ 269,463 $ 275,375 $ 280,643$283,919$286,427
Notes:

Result: TheSupplemental ParklmprovementFundreportsfundsbeingheldbeyondthefive-yearsasdescribedbyABl600. Perthe2023Capital lmprovementPlan funds are reserued for the Benevento Family Park project. The Supplemental Park lmprovement Fund will be utilized for a total of $285,000 for this prcject which is currently in the design phase.
b

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Supplemental Park Fee
Capital lmprovement Projects
FY 202'l-22 Proiects
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer) $
$
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
100a/o
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ $
Project
Amount
$ $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Expenditures
Fee
FY 2020-21 Proiects Expended
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer) $
$
100% $ $
Project
Amount
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$
Non-lmpact
Expenditures
$
Fee
FY 2019.20 Proiects Expended
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer) $ 435
$ 435
100Yo $ 435 $
$ 435 $
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
Impact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Expenditures
$
Fee
FY 2018-19
(interfund transfer) $ 1O0Yo $
$
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$
FY 201748 Projects
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer) $
$-
1 lnterfund transfers are used to reimburse the General Fund for providing General Government support. 100% $ $
$ $
7

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Gity of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Gompliance 2022
City-Wide Park lmprovement Fund
Fund 412
Section4.10.0'l0oftheFolsomMunicipal CodeestablishestheprovisionforcollectionofaParklmprovementimpactfee. Thefeeestablished by this chapter is in addition to any other fees or charges, or taxes, required by law or city code as a condition of development, including, but not limited to, the residential construction tax levied by Chapter 17.90, capital improvement-new construction seryice charge levied by Chapter 17 .92, drainage fees levied by Chapter 1 7.95, Quimby Act fees levied by Chapter 16.32 and major road fees levied by Chapter 12.04. the tee established by this chapter is to be collected for park and recreation facilities for which an account shall be established and funds appropriated, and for which a proposed construction schedule shall be adopted. The fee imposed by this chapter is necessary in order to assure compliance with the applicable general plan requirements that new development bear the cost for park and recreation infrastructure which is needed to serve such development.

CITY-WDE PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND FEE SCHEDULE
Use Category Basis Fee Amount
Residential, Single Family
Residential, Multiple Family
Residential Senior dwelling
Mobile Dwellings
Commercial/lndustrial Development
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Sq. Ft.
7,037
4,675
3,614
2,701

0.476
$
$
$
$
$
Description
Statement of Revenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for Last Five Fiscal Years
FY 2017118 FY 2018/19 FY 2019120 FY 2020t21 FY 2021122
Revenues
Fees
lnterest
Other Revenues
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB 1600 Expenditures
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End ofYear
Available Fund Balance
$ 3,819,319
34,929
$ 2,539,916
42,345
2,643
$ 2,034,287
141,800
7,334
446,419
1 9,1 63
1,488
$ 1 ,010,323
(1 19,283)
$
$ 3,854,248 $ 2,584,905 $ 2,183,421 $ 467,070 $ 891,040 $ 5,256,400
$ 21,737
$ 999,904
$ 43,231
145,665
80,371
152,101
21,528
165,512
9,943
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 5,278,137
$ (1,423,88e)
$ 1,856,322
$ 1 ,043,1 35
$ 1,541,769
$ 432,434
$ 226,036
$ 1,957,386
$ 1,974,203
$ 173,629
$ 293,441
$ 3,931,589
175,455
715,585
$
$
$
$ 432,434 $ 1,974,203 $ 3,931,589 $ 4,225,029 $ 4,940,615 $ 432,434 $ 1,974,203 $ 4,225,029 $ 4,940,615_$_q,e315gg_ 8

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

City-Wide Park lmprovement Fund
Available Revenue current Year
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (s-yrs and beyond)
Available Revenue Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First ln First Out Method
$ 432,4_34 $ 1,e74,203 r
?,i1i:121,
467,070
2,183,421
1,574,538
891,040
467,070
2,183,421
1,399,084
$
$ 432,434 $ 1,974,203 $ 3,931,589 $ 4,225,025 $ 4,940,615 Result: Five Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital lmprovement Projects
FY 2021-22 Proiects
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
Operations
Livermore Park
Benevento Park (Empire Ranch Site 51)
Sutter Middle School Gym
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2020-21 Projects
Operations
Davies Park
Benevento Park (Empire Ranch Site 51)
Sutter Middle School Gym
Memorial/Celebratory Benches
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
$ 32,305
6,239
26,968
100,000
9,943
$ 175,455
Project
Amount
Expended
$ 175,455 $
1000
100%
100Yo
100%
100%
32,305
6,239
26,968
'100,000
9,943
$ $
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Expenditures
Fee
$ 30,727
4,650
15,236
100,000
1,488
21,528
$ 173,629
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
100o/o
100%
100o/o
100Yo
0%
100%
$ 30,727
4,650
15,236
100,000
$
1,488
21,528
$ 172,141 $ 1,488
FY 2019-20 Projects
Operations
BT Collins Park
Econome Park (Site 44)
Sutter Middle School Gym
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
$ 37,067
1,838
6,760
100,000
80,371
29,733
1,838
6,760
100,000
80,371
80%
100o/o
101o/o
100%
100Yo
$ $ 7,334
$ 226,036
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 218,702 $ 7,334
FY 2018-'19 Projects
Operations
Livermore Park
Johnny Cash Art Park
Johnny Cash Trail Art
Econome Park (Site 44)
Sutter Middle School Gym
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
$ 90,537
(5,518)
(371)
9,216
806,040
100,000
43,231
87,894 $
(5,518)
(371)
9,216
806,040
100,000
$ 2,643
43 231
97Yo
1O0o/.
100Yo
1OjYo
1lQo/o
100o/o
100o/o
I
$ 1 ,043,1 35 $ 1,040,492 $ 2,643

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

FY 20'17-18 Proiects
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
Operations
Lew Howard Park
Livermore Park
Johnny Cash Art Park
Econome Park (Site 44)
$ 208,624
377
37,291
34,288
4,975,820
10OYo
1A0o/o
100%
100o/o
100o/o
208,624
377
37,291
34,288
$ $
4,975,820
$ 5,256,400 $$ 5,256,400
Notes:
1 lnlerfund transfers are used to reimburse the General Fund for providing General Government support. 10

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

City of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Gompliance 2022
Police Gapital
Fund 428
Section 3.80.010 of the Folsom Municipal Code establishes the provision to implement the City General Plan, Urban Development Policy No.

11.6, and to provide for adequate police, fire and general governmental services and facilities to serve new residential, industrial and commercial developmenithroughout the City. The City Council determined that the existing police, fire and general governmental services and facilities would be inadequate to accommodate the needs generated by projected new residential, industrial and commercial growth in the City, and additional services and facilities were needed to protect and promote the health, safety and welfare of Folsom residents and businesses. Under this section of the City's Municipal Charter the City established three improvement funds entitled the police improvement fund, the fire improvement fund and the general government improvement fund. The amount of the capital improvement new construction fee shall be established by resolution adopted by the City Council of the City, and shall be based upon the determination in the Nexus Studies of: (1) the use of the fee and the type of development on which the fee is imposed; (2) the need for the facilities and/or services created by the new residential and commercial development; and (3) the reasonable cost of the faciliiies and/or services attributable to new development. (Ord. 871 S 1 (part), 1997) All fees collected pursuant to this chapter shall be deposited in these improvement funds and shall be expended solely to finance the planning, construction and development of the facilities and services identified in the Nexus Studies.

POLICE CAPITAL FUND FEE SCHEDULE
Use Category
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Dwellings
Commercial Lodging
Commercial Development
lndustrial Development
FY 2017t18
Basis Fee Amount
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

FY 2018t19
601
681
156
35 1.012

0.875
$
$
$
$
$
$
Statement of Revenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for Last Five Fiscal Years
Descriotion FY 2019/20 FY 2020t21 FY 2021122
Revenues
Fees
lnterest
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB 1600 Expenditures
Debt Service - interfund transfer
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End of Year
Available Fund Balance
$ 535,099
697
$ 307,384
13,649
376,561
19,536
$ $ 48,085
13,505
$ 169,303
s,3027
$
542,796 $ 321,033 $ 396,098 $ 61,590 $ 178,606
117,796
716
$ 43,185 $ 137,633
500,000
$$
$
$
$
$
$
$
500,000
42,796
400,769
321,033
443,565
$ 1 1 8,512
$ 277,586
$ 764,598
$ 43,185
$ 18,405
$ 1,042,184
$ 1,060,589
$ 137,633
$ 40,973
$ 1,060,589
$ 443.565 $ 764,598 $ 1,042,184 $ t, 101 .562
$ 443,565 $ 764,598 $ r 184 $1,060,589 $1,101,562
11

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Police Capital
Available Revenue Current Year
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (z-yr old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr Old Funds)
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (5-yrs old Funds)
Available Revenue Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years
Total Revenue Available
Assigned Fund Balance
Total Available Revenue
FY 2021-22Projects
Police HQ Remodel
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
Five Year Revenue Test Using First ln First Out Method
g 443'565 t lll:3ll
$ 396,098
321,033
325,053
61,590
396,098
321,O33
281,868
178,606
61,590
396,098
321,033
144,235
$$
$ 443,565 $ 764,598 $ 1,042,184 $ 1,060,589 $ ',1,101,562 $
Result: Five Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Gapital lmprovement Projects
443,565$764,598$1,042,184$1,060,589$1,101,562
Project Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 137,633
$ 137,633
100%
0%
$ 137,633 $
FY 2020-21 Proiects
Project Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 137,633 $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpaci
Fee
Expenditures
$Police HQ Remodel
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2019-20 Proiects
$ 43,185
$ 43,185
Project Amount
Expended
100%
0%
$ 43,185
$ 43,185 $
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
Purchase of Police Vehicles
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2018-19 Projects
FY 2017-18 Proiects
$ 117,796
716
$ 1 18,512
Project Amount
Expended
100%
100% 716
$ 1 17,796 $
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 118,512 $
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$-
Non-lmpact
Fee
$
Expenditures
$
Project Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 5oo,ooo
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 785,125$ I ,285,12s 39o/oDebt Ser. on Municipal Svcs. Complex (interfund transfer) General Government Overhead (inledund transfer)
$ 1,285,125
Notes:
1 lnterfund transfers are used to reimburse the General Fund for providing General Government support. $ 500,000 $ 785,125
12

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

City of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Gompliance 2022
Fire Gapital
Fund 441
Section 3.80.010 of the Folsom Municipal Code establishes the provision to implementthe City General Plan, Urban Development Policy No.

11.6, and to provide for adequate police, fire and general governmental services and facilities to serve new residential, industrial and commercial development throughout the City. The City Council determined that the existing police, fire and general governmental services and facilities would be inadequate to accommodate the needs generated by projected new residential, industrial and commercial growth in the City, and additional services and facilities were needed to protect and promote the health, safety and welfare of Folsom residents and businesses.

Under this section of the City's Municipal Charter the City established three improvement funds entitled the police improvement fund, the fire improvement fund and ihe general government improvement fund. The amount of the capital improvement new construction fee shall be esiablished by resolution adopted by the City Council of the City, and shall be based upon the determination in the Nexus Studies of: (1) the use of the fee and the type of development on which the fee is imposed; (2) the need for the facilities and/or services created by the new residential and commercial development; and (3) the reasonable cost of the facilities and/or services aftributable to new development. (Ord. 871 g 1 (part), 1997) All fees collected pursuant to this chapter shall be deposited in these improvementfunds and shall be expended solely to finance the planning, construction and development of the facilities and services identified in the Nexus Studies.

FIRE CAPITAL FUND FEE SCHEDULE
Use Gategory Basis Fee Amount
Single Family Residential
MultFFamily Residential
Mobile Dwellings
Commercial Lodging
Commercial Development
lndustrial Development
Per Unit
Per Unit
1,086
1,050
1,083
939

0.634

0.276
Per Unit
Per Unit
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Description
SfafementofRevenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for Last Five Fiscal Years
FY 2017t18 FY 2018/19 FY 20',t9t20 FY 2020t21 FY 2021n2 Revenues
Fees
lnterest
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB 1600 Expenditures
Debt Service - interfund kansfer
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End ofYear
Available Fund Balance
$ 2,535,312 $ 1,193,723 $ 1,599,857
$ 832,887
50,565
$ 478,923
46,994
503,670
26,669
77,107
(12,922\
$ 247,787
(2,412)
$ $
$ 883,452 $ 525,916 $ 530,339 $ 64,185 $ 245,374
$ 1,393,613
79,493
$ 2,008,060 $$ 1,785,969
80,049
1,487
80,420
43,784
$
$ 1 ,473,1 06
$ (58e,654)
$ 1,867,505
$ (1,341,58e)
$ 2,535,312
$ 124,204
$ 406,135
$ 1,193,723$3, 124.965
52,86'1
-il-2p6d52
$ (1,996,736)
$ 1,599,857
157,800
2,323
$ 160,'123
$ 85,251
$ (396,87s)
$ (311,627)
_$ (311,624$ 2,535,312 193.723 $ 1,599,857
_$___(!e6,8?9I
$ (396,87e)$ t,
13

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

Fire Capital
Five Year Revenue Test Using First ln First Out Method
Available Revenue current Year $ 883,452 $ 525,916 $
Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (2-yr Old Funds) 261,534 667,807 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (3-yr Old Funds) 305,1 33 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (4-yr old Funds) 448,359 Available Revenue Prior Fiscal Year (s-yrs Old Funds) 540,325 Available Revenue Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 96,509 530,339
525,91 6
543,602
$
Total Revenue
Assigned Fund Balance
$ 2,535,312 $ 1,193,723 $ 1,599,857 $
Total Available Revenue
Result: Five Year Revenue test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital lmprovement Projects
$ 2,535,3 12 $ 1,193,723 $ 1,599,857 $
FY 2021-22 Proiects
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
Debt Service on Fire Station 35 (interfund transfer)
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
FY 2020-21 Proiects
$ 223,947
2,323
70%
100%
$ 157,800
2,323
66,147
$ 160,123 $ 66,147
$
$
2 $ 226,270
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 2,008,060
52,861
$ 2,430,715
52,861
$ 2,483,576
83%
100%
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 422,655
$ 2,060,921 $ 422,655
Station 38 Remodel
General Government Overhead (interfund transfe0
FY 2019-20 Proiects
Debt Service on Fire Station 35 (interfund transfer)
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 223,388
43,784
$ 267,172
Project
Amount
Expended
36%
100Yo
$ 80,420
43,784
$ 142,968
FY 2018.19 Proiects
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
$ 124,204
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 142,968
Non-lmpact
Fee
Expenditures
$ 142,308
1 375,444
2 Debt Service on Fire Station 35 (interfund transfer)
Fire Station #39
General Government Overhead (interfund transfe{
FY 2017-18 Proiects
$ 222,357
2,161,413
,t,487
$ 2.385,257
Project
Amount
Expended
Percent
Funded by
lmpact Fees
lmpact Fee
Expenditures
$ 79,493
1 ,393,613
NonJmpaci
Fee
Expenditures
$ 142,820
1 2,342,308
36%
83o/o
100o/o
$ 80,049
1,785,969
1,487
$ 1,867,505 $ 517,752
Debt Service on Fire Station 35 (interfund transfer)
Fire Station #39
General Government Overhead (interfund transfer)
$ 222,313
3,735,921
36Yo
37o/o
$ 3,958,234
Notes:
1 lnterfundtransfersareusedtoreimbursetheGeneralFundfortheimpactfeeportionofthedebtservicepaymentsandcapitalexpenses. 2 lnterfund transfers are used lo reimburse the General Fund for providing General Government support. $ 1,473,106 $ 2,485,128
14

12/13/2022 Item No.19.

City of Folsom
Developer lmpact Fee Compliance 2022
General Capital
Fund 445
Section 3.80.0'10 of the Folsom Municipal Code establishes the provision to implementthe City General Plan, Urban Development Policy No. 11.6, and to provide for adequate police, fire and general governmental services and facilities to serve new residential, industrial and commercial development throughout the City. The City Council determined that the existing police, fire and general governmental services and facilities would be inadequate to accommodate the needs generated by projected new residential, industrial and commercial growth in the City, and additional services and facilities were needed to protect and promote the health, safety and welfare of Folsom residents and businesses. Under this section of the City's Municipal Charter the City established three improvement funds entitled the police improvement fund, the fire improvement fund and the general government improvement fund. The amount of the capital improvement new construction fee shall be established by resolution adopted by the Cily Council of the City, and shall be based upon the determination in the Nexus Studies of: (1) the use of the fee and the type of development on which the fee is imposed; (2) the need for the facilities and/or services created by the new residential and commercial development; and (3) the reasonable cost of the facilities and/or services attributable to new development. (Ord. 871 S 1 (part), 1997) All fees collected pursuant to this chapter shall be deposited in these improvement funds and shall be expended solely to finance the planning, construction and development of the facilities and services identified in the Nexus Studies.

GENERAL CAPITAL FUND FEE SCHEDULE
Use Gategory Basis Fee Amount
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Dwellings
Commercial Lodging
Commercial Development
lndustrial Development
Statement of Revenues Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance tor Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 2017t18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019t20 FY 2020t21 FY 2021t22 Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
1,596
''1,596
1,589
228

0.498

0.495
Sq. Ft.

Sq. Ft.

Revenues
Fees
lnterest
Total Revenues
Expenditures
AB '1600 Expenditures
Debt Service - interfund transfer
AB 1600 Transfers Out
Revenues less Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning ofYear
Fund Balance, End ofYear
Available Fund Balance
$ 1,242,626
19,876
$ 701 ,310 $ 714,359
3,681
$ 117,263 $ 365,120
9,92137 077 10 224
$ 1,262,502 $ 738,387 $ 718,041 $ 127,487 $ 375,040
$ 1 17,834
600,000
4,617
$ 42,871
'1 ,856,1 1 0
$ 2,505
152,745
$ 1,582 $
7022 1,211
$ 722,451
$ 540,051
$ 828,320
$ 1,901,683
$ (1,163,2e6)
$ 1,368,371
$ 155,250
$ 562,790
$ 205,075
$ 1,582
$ 125,905
$ 767,865
$ 1,211
$ 373,829
$ 893,770
$ 1,368,371 $ 205,075 $ 767,865 $ 893,770 $ 1,267,599
$ 1,368,371 $ 205,075 $ 767,865 $ 893,770 $ '1,267,599
15