Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Hanford City Council
June 2, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 2, 2026
Body
Hanford City Council
Pages
755
Original file
50.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on hanfordca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 26 |
of our Project Managers, Justina Conklin, and Mark Christensen. We have also assigned a seasoned professional, Mark Imbriani, to assist Justina and Mark in implementing the Quality Management Program for this contract. TRC’s Quality Management Program involves reviewing scope, methodology, reports, and all other deliverables, as well as monitoring client and subconsultant relationships. Justina and Mark will first establish clear communication protocols for the team.

The QA / QC Plan designates specific quality assurance roles for each team member, as well as interdisciplinary checks. In order to assure that the project delivery is performed in a timely manner, the Project Manager will update the project schedule frequently, noting critical submittals at the 35%, 65%, 95%, and 100% design phases. In the schedule, adequate time will be given for the agencies to conduct appropriate reviews, so that these critical milestones can be accurately placed in the schedule and followed by the team. A QC review task will also be assigned and will allow the Project Manager to administer an interdisciplinary review. This gives the entire team time to review
each other’s plans and look for
conflicts or errors between
disciplines and correct these
errors before submitting to the
client. For example, the landscape
designer will review the traffic
handling, utility, and electrical
plans. At the same time, the
electrical designer will review the
other disciplines. The Project
Manager will be in charge of
making sure that all of their comments get addressed. These peer reviews with principal, project managers and lead designers will be conducted to ensure that quality control is maintained throughout the duration of each task.

Among other things, for example, the Project Manager will:
▪ Provide ongoing quality assurance for prime and / or subconsultants’ deliverables or submittals. ▪ Designate a construction specialist to perform a constructability review. ▪ Provide deliverables on or prior to the due dates.
▪ Provide final plans, specifications, and estimate review for coordination among all disciplines and all work products.

Good QA/QC starts with the scoping meeting held upon consultant selection. We will meet with you to discuss your goals, work-to-date, available work products, and desired outcomes. At this meeting we wish to obtain input from all stakeholders on the project, so their needs are identified and thus can be met. After that, a detailed scope of work will be developed so that all parties are clear as to exactly what work will be performed by the City, the TRC team, and others (such as review agencies).

During prosecution of the work, we will provide opportunity for City progress reviews at your office. This will provide early evaluation of our progress and our technical approach to analysis and design. This will also generate an ongoing dialogue and assist us in providing milestone products which meet your needs.

Page 270 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 27 |
The result of our plan has been biddable and buildable
construction documents, low bids, many bidders, and very few change orders during construction. Please contact our
references in this regard. The primary benefit provided through our QA / QC program is the confidence in our construction contract documents, which provides for the lowest project cost while still providing value to the client. A summary of engineer’s estimates and bids received for some of our past projects appears in the chart. Note the excellent correlation between our estimates and the low bid. This should give the City confidence in your budgeting process, in that the budget should not significantly change from project conception to project completion.

SUMMARY
Much of this has been discussed above, but, due to its
importance, it too bears repeating. Quality is one of TRC’s core values. As such, TRC employs a quality management program that incorporates responsibility for quality throughout the organization, and benefits from process improvements realized on similar projects.

Communication As noted above, our goal is for “no surprises” and a partnership that has a common understanding and expectations every step of the way. Proven communication tools will keep our team focused on the City’s goals. Our communication procedures will include:
✓ Project Communication and Management Manual
✓ Protocol for electronic communication, including establishment of password protected FTP site. ✓ Team weekly meetings, impromptu meetings as needed.
✓ Timely meetings and reporting to the City.

Quality Standards TRC’s Quality Management Program incorporates:
✓ A Commitment of all team members to follow proper standards used throughout the project. ✓ Quality Assurance and Control Procedures: Procedures include management oversight, clear definition of roles and responsibilities, and administrative functions associated with tracking and reporting. ✓ Document Control: Establish an electronic document management system and assign one person to be responsible for maintaining these documents.

Confirming Quality While it is important to build quality into the work, formal checking and review are critical quality activities. Quality checking activities, which are all documented with checklists and three-level approvals, include:
✓ Peer Review/Coordination Checking: Coordination and independent checking activities are performed by a separate peer reviewer (or group) consisting of checkers. ✓ Discipline Review: Technical checking and review activities are performed by each responsible technical or design discipline under the direction of our various discipline leaders. ✓ Independent Deliverable Review: All TRC work products are independently checked until the originators and checkers both agree to the validity and accuracy of the work product. Mark Imbriani, PE, is our Our QA/QC results in:

Less Rework, Fewer Change Orders
Improved Constructability, Resulting in
Lower Cost to the Client

Page 271 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 28 |
designated QA / QC Lead. He will review all work and verify that all technical checks have been completed.

Subconsultant Quality TRC requires that each subconsultant either adheres to our Quality Management Program or that they have their own. From our past experience working with our subconsultants assigned to on- calls, we are well aware of the high-quality work they perform.

Timeliness As our Quality Management Program is built into how we do business, our deliverables will not be delayed because “they still need to be checked.” We convene internal over-the-shoulder review of deliverables at least one week before they are due. This allows the Project Manager, the Principal-in-Charge, and the discipline managers to verify their completeness and adjust staff assignment if needed to meet the deliverable schedule.

TRC’s values include accountability,
creativity, integrity, passion,
consistent quality, a safety-first
culture, teamwork, and a
commitment to our communities.

Many of our projects have won
awards for our clients from ASCE,
APWA, TCAG, and CTF, among
others. TRC believes that project
success is measured not only by
meeting the schedule and
budget, but also by providing a
project that meets the needs of our
clients and the public.

Page 272 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 29 |
D.3. ROLES OF TRC’S KEY STAFF
TRC’s Key Staff
TRC, the prime consultant, will provide project management, civil / roadway, and structures design services, including PS&E, funding assistance, feasibility studies, utility / railroad coordination, drainage and storm water services, outreach support, bidding assistance and construction support, peer / constructability review and Caltrans funding application assistance. Mark Imbriani, PE will be your Contract Manager / Principal-In- Charge, Justina Conklin, PE, will be your Civil/Roadway Project Manager, and Mark Christensen, PE, will be your Structures Project Manager. Short bios are provided for TRC’s key personnel. Two-page resumes are provided in the appendix.

Mark Imbriani, PE
Contract Manager /
Principal-In-Charge /
Funding / QA & QC
✓ 43 years of
experience
25 years with TRC
✓ B.S., Civil Engineering, Case
Institute of Technology, 1980
✓ Professional Engineer, California,
#36634, 1983
Mr. Imbriani has experience in
project management, grant
application writing and engineering,
value engineering, design PS&E, and
construction bidding assistance and
management of projects. He will
oversee the design group to
successfully prepare PS&E.
▪ City of Hanford, 13th Avenue at
Grangeville Boulevard (PM - $968K)
▪ City of Hanford, Grangeville
Blvd./BNSF Grade Sep Study (PM-
$126K)
▪ City of Hanford, Grade Separation
Fund Grant Applications (PM)
▪ City of San Luis Obispo Railroad
Safety Multi-Use Trail and Grade
Sep. (PM - $4.5M)
▪ City of Visalia, SR198 / Akers St.

Interchange Modification (QA/QC -
$4.5M)
▪ Sonoma County, Geysers Road
Emergency Repairs (PM - $3.9M)
Justina Conklin, PE
Civil / Roadway
Project Manager
✓ 32 years of
experience
16 years with TRC
✓ B.S., Civil Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento,
1991
✓ Professional Engineer,
California, #53183, 1995
Ms. Conklin will lead the civil /
roadway design of developing
preliminary alignment concepts and
preparing final roadway PS&E
documents for construction. She has
successfully delivered PS&E projects
including new road designs, road
widening projects, emergency repair
and storm damage projects, traffic
signal projects, and studies.
▪ City of Hanford, 13th Avenue at
Grangeville Boulevard (PM - $968K)
▪ City of Hanford, Grangeville
Blvd./BNSF Grade Sep Study (PE-
$126K)
▪ San Benito County, On-Call
Roadway Improvements (PM -
$20.7M)
▪ Monterey County, On-Call Four
Roadway Rehabilitations (PM -
$6.2M)
▪ City of Visalia, SR198 / Akers St.

Interchange Modification (PM -
$4.5M)
Mark Christensen, PE
Structures Project
Manager
✓ 39 years of
experience
20 years with TRC
✓ MBA, Engineering and Science
Management, University of
California, Davis, 1987
B.S., Civil Engineering, Oregon
State University, 1985
✓ Professional Engineer, California,
#45569, 1990
Mr. Christensen will lead the
structures design encompassing
transportation structures, bridge
design and rehabilitation, roadways,
hydraulics, and construction. He
oversees the development of
preliminary concepts to final PS&E
documents for construction.
▪ San Benito County, New Idria
Bridge Replacement (PM - $6M)
▪ Sonoma County, Asti Permanent
Bridge Crossing (PM - $43M)
▪ Sonoma County, 2019 FEMA
Geysers Road Storm Damage
Repairs (QA/QC - $6.9M)
▪ City of Vacaville, Ulatis Creek Bank
Stabilization (PM- $3M)
▪ Sacramento County, Elverta Road
Bridge Replacement (PE- $TBD)
▪ San Benito County, Quick Start
Roadway Improvements (QA/QC -
$8.6M)
Other TRC vital personnel assisting our project leadership are shown below. We have included four subconsultants on our team to assist with any project(s). Resumes for all key personnel can be found in the Appendix.

Page 273 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 30 |
Aaron Bedal, PE
Senior Civil / Roadway Engineer
✓ 11 years of experience
11 years with TRC
✓ B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, 2013
✓ Professional Engineer, California, #86668, 2016
Mr. Bedal has experience in design parameters,
preparing conceptual design plans and estimates, and
completing the PS&E documents to bid. He specializes
in design of roadways, pathways, site layout, utility
layout, grading, drainage design, and roadway rehab
design, and has vast experience with Caltrans and
AASHTO's design standards.
▪ City of Hanford, 13th Avenue at Grangeville
Boulevard (DE - $968K)
▪ City of Hanford, Grangeville Blvd./BNSF Grade Sep
Study (DE-$126K)
▪ San Benito County, On-Call Roadway Improvements
(PM - $20.7M)
▪ Monterey County, Four Road Rehabilitations (DE -
$6.2M)
▪ City of Visalia, SR 198 / Akers Street Interchange
Improvements / Roadway Widening (PE - $4.5M)
Carlos Silva
Senior Civil / Roadway Project Engineer
✓ 30 years of experience
3 years with TRC
✓ B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, 1993
Mr. Silva is involved in all aspects of civil/roadway and highway design. He provides project management
assistance, QA/QC on projects, communication and
coordination with clients, local agencies, utility
companies, and provides construction support
services. He is very versed in Caltrans Local Assistance procedures and standards, and Caltrans, AASHTO,
MUTCD, FHWA and ADA and local agency standards.
▪ San Benito County, On-Call Roadway Improvements
(PM - $20.7M)
▪ Monterey County, Four Road Rehabilitations (DE -
$6.2M)
▪ Sonoma County, 2019 FEMA Geysers Road Storm
Damage Repairs (PE - $6.9M)
▪ City of Vacaville, Ulatis Creek Bank Stabilization (PE - $3M)

Cameron Pinkerton, PE
Structures Project Engineer
✓ 19 years of experience
✓ 19 years with TRC
✓ B.S., Civil Engineering, University of California,
Berkeley, 2004
✓ Professional Engineer, California, #73288, 2008
Mr. Pinkerton has experience in all aspects of the
analysis and design of transportation structures. His
experience ranges from advance planning studies and
type selections to field investigations, dynamic and
seismic analyses, preliminary and final design,
through detailing and plan set production, and
construction support services.
▪ Santa Clara County, Alamitos Creek Bridge
Replacement (PE - $8M)
▪ Monterey County, Davis Road Bridge Replacement
and Multimodal Widening (PE - $60M)
▪ Monterey County, Castroville Rail Crossing
Pathways & Bike/Pedestrian Bridge (PE - $7.1M)
▪ San Benito County, On-Call New Idria Bridge
Replacement (Structures PE - $6M)
Kiana Negoro, PE
Structures Senior Engineer
✓ 9 years of experience
9 years with TRC
✓ B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Fresno, 2014
✓ Professional Engineer, California, #88362, 2017
Ms. Negoro has experience in the preparation of plans,
structural calculations, cost estimates, and
specifications as well as review of construction
submittals. Her experience includes bridge
replacements and rehabilitations as well as retaining
walls and culverts with Caltrans involvement.
▪ San Benito County, On-Call New Idria Bridge
Replacement (DE - $6M)
▪ Fresno County, Fresno Canal at McKinley Avenue
Bridge Replacement (DE - $1.5M)
▪ Santa Clara County, Alamitos Creek Bridge
Replacement (DE - $8M)
▪ Sonoma County, Asti Permanent Bridge Crossing (DE
- $43M)

Page 274 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 31 |
TRC Key Team References
References for our Key TRC team members listed on the organization chart are shown below.

Client | Contact Name Mailing Address | Email | Phone Projects Performed San Benito County Public
Works Department
Steve Loupe
Project Manager
2301 Technology Parkway
Hollister, CA 95023
[email protected]
(831) 207-8347
✓ Funding Acquisition for HSIP and LRSP
✓ On-Call Roadway Improvement Projects
✓ New Idria Bridge Replacement Project
Sonoma County Public
Infrastructure (formerly
TPW)

Johannes Hoevertsz
Public Works Director
Stevan Hunter
Project Manager

Yoash Tilles
Special Projects
400 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 100
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

[email protected]
(707) 565-2550

[email protected]
(707) 565-4927

[email protected]
(707) 565-1205
✓ Asti Permanent Bridge Crossing
✓ On-Call, Geysers Road Emergency Repair
✓ On-Call, Cazadero Highway Emergency
Repair
✓ Frasier Creek Bridge at Geysers Road
Replacement
✓ Franz Creek Bridge on Franz Valley School
Road Replacement
✓ Big Sulphur Creek Bridge at Geysers Road
Replacement
Monterey County Public
Works, Facilities & Parks
Enrique Saavedra
Project Manager

Patricia Lopez
Project Manager

Billy Issa
Project Manager

J. Erich Rauber
Project Manager
168 W. Alisal Street
Salinas, CA 93901

[email protected]
(831) 755-8970

[email protected]
(831) 755-8998

[email protected]
(831) 796-1343

[email protected]
(831) 755-5855
✓ On-Call Services, Four Roadway
Rehabilitations
✓ Las Lomas Drive Bicycle Lane and
Pedestrian Project
✓ On-Call Five Bridges
✓ Davis Road Widening and Bridge Design
✓ Castroville Rail Crossing Pathway and
Bike/Ped Bridge
✓ Palo Colorado Emergency Repair
✓ Schulte Road Bridge Replacement
City of Santa Cruz
Department of Public Works
Joshua Spangrud
Senior Engineer
809 Center Street, Room 201
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
[email protected]
(831) 420-5178
✓ Murray Street Bridge Rehabilitation
✓ Branciforte Creek Bicycle / Pedestrian
Multi-Use Crossing
✓ San Lorenzo River Pedestrian / Bicycle
Bridge
City of San Luis Obispo
Public Works Department
Bryan Wheeler
Project Manager
919 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
[email protected]
(805) 781-7178
✓ On-Call Services, Railroad Safety Trail – Taft
to Phillips
✓ California / Foothill Railroad Grade Crossing
Improvements
Sacramento County
Department of
Transportation
Melissa Jones
Principal Civil Engineer
4111 Branch Center Road
Sacramento, CA 95827
[email protected]
(916) 874-4243
✓ On-Call Transportation Design Services
✓ Elverta Road Bridge Replacement
✓ Arcade Creek Pedestrian and Bicycle
Crossing Feasibility Study
✓ Elkhorn Boulevard Bridge at UPRR

Page 275 of 755 ends

E.

SCOPE OF WORK

Page 276 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 32 |
E. SCOPE OF WORK
E.1. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK STATEMENT
TRC will provide project management, civil / roadway, and structures design services, including PS&E, funding assistance, feasibility studies, utility / railroad coordination, drainage and storm water services, outreach support, bidding assistance and construction support, peer / constructability review and Caltrans funding application assistance. Our subconsultants will provide environmental, surveying, street lighting and electrical, and landscape architecture. We believe the team’s intimate knowledge of the Northern California area; experience on similar local agency and Caltrans projects; knowledge of Caltrans, local agency and FHWA procedures; and professional relationships with Caltrans personnel involved in the project approval and funding processes will provide a great benefit to the City. These strengths are especially important, as proactive coordination and effective communication will be the main determinants of success.

TRC's work plan will be the same plan we have utilized on our many other successful projects and is based on the understanding we have of typical City projects, gained through experience working on other projects, our staff members’ experience with similar local agency projects, and our experience with Federal, State, and locally funded projects. Each project has provided opportunities to improve our master Scope of Services, to better satisfy the goals and needs of our clients. Essential elements of the TRC Work Plan include Quality Assurance / Quality Control, Constructability Reviews, the Plan Sheet List, Deliverables List, Biddability Reviews, and Value Analysis. These activities will provide cost-effective design and quality in the construction documents and finished work.

Importantly, our work on many previous local agency Caltrans-oversight projects has allowed us to develop a quite detailed Scope of Services for the basic and supplemental tasks that will or may be required to satisfy the needs of the City, Caltrans, and other affected agencies. To keep this proposal brief, we have included only an outline scope of work herein.

We have found that our clients receive the greatest benefit if we jointly prepare a clear and detailed scope of work, by holding a scoping meeting with our client after consultant selection, but before the contract execution.

The scoping meeting involves a detailed discussion of each task, including controversial issues or positions, to resolve differences to produce a clear plan of action for the TRC team (and other stakeholders) to pursue. TRC will prepare edits to the scope after this meeting and send it to the City for review and final reconciliation. In this way, a solid understanding of the project is developed, and a complete thorough scope of work prepared. The result is highly likely to be a successful project! (Note TRC does all this work at no charge to our clients, demonstrating the faith we have in this process and the benefits we know the client and TRC will realize.) Project Elements (Generic)
The following work plan elements will be included in the agreement:

1. Scope of Work - Indicates the detailed tasks to be performed for each phase of the project, and the logical and required order in which they need to be performed.

2. Plan Sheet List – A list of anticipated plan sheets to be developed.

3. Deliverables List – lists project deliverables, the task in which each will be prepared, and the scheduled delivery date of each.

4. Project Schedule - a detailed project schedule in Microsoft Project.

The Plan Sheet List, Deliverables List, and Schedule will be finalized with the Scope for each project. They may vary also on the selected alternative and project approach (detour, construction staging, etc.).

Page 277 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 33 |
Projects will typically be divided into the following three phases:
▪ Phase 1 – Will begin at NTP and covers Preliminary Design and Environmental Documents (PA & ED) and Technical Studies
▪ Phase 2 – Will begin after the approved Environmental Document and covers Final Design, Right-of-Way, and Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate. ▪ Phase 3 – Will begin when project is out to bid and includes Bidding Assistance and Construction Administration and Management.

PHASE 1 – PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Kickoff Meeting, Site Visit, Field
Review Meeting, site visit/field review, photos, review available information Topographic Surveys and
Stream Cross-Sections AutoCAD Civil3D formatted mapping Hydraulics Hydrologic, hydraulic, and scour studies
Geotechnical Geotechnical and materials investigation, analysis, recommendations Utility Coordination Assist City to identify necessary relocations and coordinate with utility owners
Alternatives Analysis Determination of most feasible and desirable option for site.

Railroad and PUC Clearance Prepare submittal to obtain RR concurrence and PUC Authorization to construct projects.
35% Design of Road and Bridge
Plans (Type Selection)
Preliminary design of plan and profile, with typical cross sections. Evaluate bridge types (type selection). Seismic retrofit strategy determination.

Environmental Clearance Perform technical studies and secure environmental clearance (TRC has a complete full-service environmental team)

PHASE 2 – FINAL ENGINEERING AND PERMITS

TASK DESCRIPTION
Design, Details, and 65%
Submittal
Perform design and detailing of the plans and submit to City for review and comment
Independent Design Check Independent design check for the bridge (if applicable) Technical Specifications Preparation of the special provisions for the contract items and boiler plate
Construction Quantities and
Cost Estimate Quantity Calculations (two independent sets) and pricing Draft (95%) PS&E Submittal Incorporate comments on 65% submittal Submit draft PS&E package to City for review and comment Right-of-Way Engineering Assist City in securing right-of-way Permits Prepare permit applications
Final (100%) PS&E Submittal Incorporate comments on Draft PS&E submittal Submit Final PS&E package to City
Bidding Assistance Provide general consultation to the City to obtain bids and assist in analysis of bids

PHASE 3 – CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES

TASK DESCRIPTION
Construction Phase Services Review submittals, provide clarifications to questions (RFIs), advise on CCOs, prepare record drawings, and other tasks as desired by the City.

Page 278 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 34 |
E.2. TYPICAL TASKS AND DELIVERABLES
Deliverables List (Generic – To Be Edited for Each Specific Project)

PROJECT MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL DELIVERABLES FINAL DESIGN • Baseline CPM Schedule and
Updates
• Administrative Draft Categorical
Exclusion • Final Geotechnical Report
• Project Information Handout • Final Draft Categorical Exclusion • Final Survey & Mapping • FTP Site Information • Admin. Draft and Final Air Quality Report • Final Foundation Report • PDT Meeting Notes with Action
Item List • Areas of Potential Effect Map • ROW Project Management Plan • Progress Reports/Invoices • Copies of Correspondence with SHPO • ROW Certification • Quality Control Plan
Documentation
• Provide Copies of Correspondence with
appropriate Native American Tribes • 60% Plans
PRELIMINARY DESIGN • Provide copies of responses from SHPO & Native American Tribes • Contract Items list
• Kickoff Meeting Agenda & Notes • Administrative Draft and Final Greenhouse Gas Emissions Study • 95% Draft Bridge Plans • Field Review Forms • Administrative Draft and Final Caltrans ISA
• 95% Draft Plans Approach
Roadway
• Community Outreach Plan and
Public Outreach Deliverables
• Administrative Draft and Final Natural
Environment Study • Engineer’s Estimate
• Topographic Base Mapping • Administrative Draft Caltrans Water Quality Assessment • Draft Special Provisions
• Bridge Advance Planning Study &
Design Memo
• Final Draft Caltrans Water Quality
Assessment • Final Plans
• Bridge Location Hydraulic Study
Memo • Wetlands Protection Strategy • Final Specifications • Bridge Design Hydraulic Study
Report • Maps Developed from Site Visit/Survey • Final Engineer's Estimate • Copies of Permit Applications • Administrative Draft CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration • RE Pending File
• Preliminary Foundation Report • Final Draft CEQA Initial Study/MND BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION

SUPPORT
• Right of Way Requirements Map • Record findings in Caltrans Visual Assessment Memorandum format. • Preconstruction Meeting Notes • Preliminary ROW & Easements
Map • Site survey map • RFI responses
• Final ROW, Easement &
Appraisal Maps • Admin. Draft of Biological Assessment • Shop drawings & submittal reviews
• Type Selection Meeting Notes • Final Draft of Biological Assessment • CCO reviews • Draft & Final Type Selection Report • Administrative Draft of Noise Study • Record drawings • Utilities Meetings Notes • Final Draft of Noise Study CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT • Copies of Utility Company
Correspondence (A, B & C letters) • Administrative Draft of Traffic Study • Preconstruction Services • Construction Services
• Design Criteria Memo • Final Draft of Traffic Study • Post-Construction Services • 30% Bridge & Roadway Design
Package with GP Level Estimate • Environmental Commitments Record • Public Relations • Traffic Management Coord.
• Design Exceptions Package • HMMP • Env. Monitoring & Compliance • Railroad and PUC Coordination • Permit Applications
• Quality Assurance & Materials
Testing
• SWPPP Construction Activities

Page 279 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 35 |
E.3. COST CONTROL AND BUDGETING METHODOLOGY
Cost Control and Budgeting Approach
For cost tracking and budget control, we use Vision accounting software by Deltek. Additionally, Project Managers have access to all project financial data within Vision and our other financial platforms at their fingertips through a Project Manager Dashboard using Microsoft Power BI (Business Intelligence). This software tracks all costs related to a project from time sheets to invoices. This complete integrated system ensures that your project accounting, tracking, billing, and scheduling are accurate and timely.

TRC successfully manages budgets on our projects, as our references in our project descriptions in Sections C and D.3 can attest.

Schedule Management
TRC utilizes Microsoft Project software to produce project schedules and status reports for each of our projects.

This includes subconsultants' tasks and City reviews. These schedules will be updated at set intervals for reporting to the client and team. These schedules also identify the critical path to successful project completion, and thus allowing management to focus on these tasks. For construction projects, Primavera P6 or other City- preferred software may be used in lieu of MS Project.

TRC successfully manages schedules on our projects, as our references in our project descriptions in Section C can attest.

Project Administration
TRC's management plan is based on methods of administration that we have successfully used on similar projects. Administration includes development of an electronic filing system. Critical files will be scanned to our network which is backed up nightly. A SharePoint site can be set up to allow the City to review or obtain documents easily. This electronic system allows all team members to have access to documents they need but maintains the security and integrity of those documents.

Page 280 of 755 ends

F.

CONFLICT OF

INTEREST

STATEMENT

Page 281 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 36 |
F. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
TRC does not have any financial, business or other relationship with the City that may have an impact upon the outcome of this consultant services agreement.

TRC does not have any current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this consultant services agreement.

Page 282 of 755 ends

G.

LITIGATION

Page 283 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 37 |
G. LITIGATION
TRC Engineers, Inc (TRC) does not have any prior or pending litigation by or against City of Hanford. However, TRC is generally subject to lawsuits arising out of its services typical of those filed against engineering and environmental consulting companies. In the opinion of TRC’s counsel, the company has meritorious defenses and is adequately insured for any such pending claims or litigation, and they will not impair TRC’s performance of the work requested by this RFP under a contract with the City of Hanford nor will it materially impact TRC’s overall business or financial capability.

Page 284 of 755 ends

H.

CONTRACT

AGREEMENT

Page 285 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 38 |
H. CONTRACT AGREEMENT
TRC has reviewed the City’s proposed contract agreement and while TRC agrees with most of the terms and conditions, if TRC is a successful proposer, we respectfully request the opportunity to discuss with the City of Hanford the addition of clarifying language and / or slight modifications that are included herein.

TRC Engineers, Inc (TRC) confirms that the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) terms shall remain in effect for ninety (90) days following the date SOQ submittals are due, September 12, 2024.

Page 286 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 39 |

Page 287 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 40 |

Page 288 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 41 |

Page 289 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 42 |

Page 290 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 43 |

Page 291 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 44 |

Page 292 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 45 |

Page 293 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 46 |
Financial Management and Accounting System
For cost tracking and budget control, we use Vision accounting software by Deltek. Additionally, Project Managers have access to all project financial data within Vision and our other financial platforms at their fingertips through a Project Manager Dashboard using Microsoft Power BI (Business Intelligence). This software tracks all costs related to a project from time sheets to invoices. This complete integrated system ensures that your project accounting, tracking, billing, and scheduling are accurate and timely.

TRC successfully manages budgets on our projects, as our references in our project descriptions in Sections C and D.3 can attest.

Page 294 of 755 ends

I.

FEDERAL AID

PROVISIONS

Page 295 of 755 ends

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES

| 47 |
I. FEDERAL AID PROVISIONS

Page 296 of 755 ends

TRC Forms

Page 297 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
49 PROPOSERS CHECKLIST

SUBMIT THIS PROPOSER’S CHECKLIST WITH YOUR PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS.

Proposers shall complete and submit all documents marked with an “X” in the “REQUIRED” column for bids to be considered responsive.

REQUIRED
Certificate of Bidders Experience and Qualifications
Exhibit 10-Q: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Exhibit 10-A: A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Exhibit 10-A Checklist – Caltrans A&I Financial Document Review Requirements for A&E Exhibit 10H: Cost Proposal. Key personnel must be named and entered on form with hourly rates. Rates are based on the Consultants Exhibit 10-K Indirect Costs Rate or the approved Safe Harbor Rate (110%).

Exhibit 10-K: Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System. Indirect Costs Rate (ICR) OR Approved Safe Harbor Rate
Exhibit 10-O2: Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
AASHTO Internal Control Questionnaire (completed by Primary Consultant only, not required for subconsultants doing less than $150,000 of work). If the Consultant is seeking an ICR different from the Safe Harbor Rate, the AASHTO ICQ must be submitted with the Proposal.

Provide a written Prevailing Wage Policy for your company that is used when working on prevailing wage jobs.

Exhibit 10-U: Consultant in Management Position Conflict of Interest Statement.

Statement of disclosure of eligibility to perform Private Development Plan review on behalf of the City of Hanford
Fee Schedule
All issued Addenda
Ownership Disclosure Form
California Levine Act Statement
Non-Collusion Affidavit (included in Federal/State requirements clauses) Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certificate (included in Federal/State requirements clauses) Equal Employment Opportunity Compliance Certificate (included in Federal/State requirements clauses) Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Certificate (included in Federal/State requirements clauses) Drug Free Workplace Certificate (included in Federal/State requirements clauses) Iran Contracting Act Certificate (included in Federal/State requirements clauses) Federal and State Requirements Acknowledgement

Attachments:

A. LAPM Exhibit Forms
B. 10R: A&E Boilerplate Agreement Language (For Local Assistance Federal-Aid Projects) C. Upcoming Projects
D. Exhibit 17 -F1 Sample (to be completed by the winning proposers - does not need to be submitted with proposal)

SUBMITTED BY:

Name of Company _________________________________________________________ Contact Name _____________________________________________________________ Address _________________________________________________________________ City ______________________ State ______________ Zip _________________ Phone No. _____________________ Fax No. ___________________________________ Consultants D.I.R. Number __________________________________________________

Page 298 of 755 ends

CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER'S

EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

The undersigned bidder certifies that they are, at the time of award, and shall be, throughout the period of the contract, licensed by the State of California to do the type of work required under terms of the contract documents. Bidder further certifies that he is skilled and regularly engaged in the general class and type of work called for in the contract documents.

The bidder represents that he is competent, knowledgeable and has special skills in the nature, extent, and inherent conditions of the work to be performed. Bidder expressly acknowledges that they are aware of and have the skill and experience to foresee and to adopt protective measures to perform the work adequately and safely.

The bidder and its employee or agent signing this Certification declares under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements and representations are true and correct and will remain true and correct throughout the period of the contract.

Signed this day of 20 .

Name of Bidder

License No. & State

Signature of Bidder

Title of Signatory

Page 299 of 755 ends

□ □ □
□ □
□ □ --
-
B
----
□ □
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q D ISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post -award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in -kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ________________________________ ________
Print Name: ________________________________ _______
Title: ________________________________ ____________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date:___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013

Page 300 of 755 ends

EXHIBIT 10-A

A&E CONSULTANT FINANCIAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUEST
Caltrans Division of Local Assistance
(Completed by Local Agencies, One per Contract)
(For New Proposed A&E Consultant Local Agency Contracts of $150,000 or Greater) (For Amendments, use only when there are additional subconsultants or changes in ICR) EMAIL TO:

California State Department of Transportation
Independent Office of Audits and Investigations
conformance [email protected] .gov
Date:

Federal Project Number : _______ _
Attention: Audit Manager, External Contracts-Local Agencies The following applicable documents are attached for proposed A&E Consultant Contract No. _______ at a proposed Contract or Amended amount of$ ______ ~ with ______________ _ (Prime Consultant's full legal name)
The Project Description is (Identify if an Amendment or a New Contract): ____________ _ Participation Amounts for Prime and all Sub-consultants on this contract are:

Consultant's Name
Participation
Amount
Category 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
or N/A (see below)
Caltrans ICR Acceptance
ID# (if available)
Note : Add pages if necessary. NI A applies to Consultants with participation amount less than $150,000 I verify that we have received from the prime & sub-consultants on this contract and are forwarding to A&I, the financial documents that meet A&I's minimum requirements for contracts~ $150,000* (as listed below) as well as the financial documents required under each Consultant's Category Requirements as specified in the Exhibit 10-A Checklist:

Minimum Requirements
1) A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Letter (Exhibit 10-A) - Completed for each contract, by Local Agency
2) Cost Proposals (Examples at Exhibit 10-Hl through 10-H4)-Completed by Consultants 3) Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Exhibit 10-K) - Completed by each Consultant (Except for firms requesting the Safe Harbor Rate) 4) Points of contact for Local Agency and Prime Consultant Name ______________ _ Signature _________________ _
Title _____________ _
Name of Local Agency and Department _________________________ _ Address __________________________________ _
*Consultants with multi-year Contracts that begin at $150,000 or more, with Indirect Cost Rates (ICR) that change every year are required to follow the same minimum and category requirements for each fiscal year ICR proposed.

April 2018

Page 301 of 755 ends

Loc11I Aiisl ~t1111ce Procedur es M11 nu11l E~hibit to-A Chccklbt

CAL TRANS A&I FINANCIAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) CONSULTANTS

ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY CONTRACTS
All Prime & Sub-consultants must submit the following minimum requirements for contracts:::: $150,000:
1) A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Letter (Exhibit I 0-A) - Completed by Local Agency for each contract ( /) 2) Cost Proposals (Examples at Exhibit JO-HI through I0-H4) - Completed by Consultants 3) Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Exhibit l0-K) - Completed by each Consultant (except for firms requesting Safe Harbor Rate)
4) Local Agency and Prime Consultant's Points of Contact If not Categories 1-3
CATEGORY 1: CATEGORY 2: CATEGORY 3: CATEGORY 4: CATEGORYS:

Firms with Firms with Firms Requesting Contracts~ Contracts ~ SIM Cognizant Caltrans Safe Barbor Rate $1S0K to< SIM and participating Type of Financial Documents and Information Approval Letter Acceptance ID (SOR) and participating amounts ~ $1SOK for ICR FYE proposed * forlCRFYE Number for ICR amounts~ to proposed FYE proposed ** $!SOK
For all Prime and Sub-consultants
Cognizant Approval Letter for the FYE proposed (issued by cognizant state, which is based on location of Accounting Records as stated in AASHTO ✓ JCQ)
Caltrans' !CR Acceptance ID #s for !CR FYE proposed •• ✓ FAR Compliant Indirect Cost Rate (!CR) Schedule including FAR References and Disclosure Notes (2)
;tPrime Co11sultant must have a CPA Audited !CR Report if contract is ~ ✓ ✓ $ , regardless of Prime Consultant's participation amount.(2) -+- Prior Year !CR Schedule ✓
AASHTO Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) Appendix B (3) ✓ ✓ Post Closing Trial Balance (4) ✓
Vacation/Sick Policy ✓
Bonus Policy ✓
Executive Compensation Analysis (ECA) (4) ✓
Prevailing Wage (PW) Policy for PW contracts (5) ✓ ✓ ✓ *** ✓ ✓ When applicable, additional documents may be requested:

Supplemental reconciliation schedule (to tie the proposed !CR Schedule to Trial Balance) (4)
Chart of Accounts
Income Statement (4)
Labor Summary Report (6)
Related Party Rent Analysis ( 4)
Vehicle, Equipment, and Other Direct Costs Schedules (4) Safe Harbor Rate Documents:

Consultant Certification of Eligibility of Contract Costs and Financial Management System (Attachment IR) ✓
Additional Documents Required 2 2 2 3 8
April 20 18

Page 302 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System EXHIBIT 10-KCONSULTANT ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF

INDIRECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required.) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:

Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.

Indirect Cost Rate:

Combined Rate % OR
Home Office Rate % and Field Office Rate (if applicable) % Facilities Capital Cost of Money % (if applicable)
Fiscal period *
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the Indirect Cost Rate was developed (not the contract period). The Indirect Cost Rate is based on the consultant’s one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.

I have reviewed the proposal to establish an Indirect Cost Rate(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the indirect cost rate(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31); • The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31;
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally- funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant’s ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.

I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on Exhibit 10-A.

Financial Management System:

Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.

Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost

Page 1 of 2 ends

March 2018

Page 303 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System accounts;
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • Internal controls to maintain integrity of financial management system; • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirement Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:

I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount $___________________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & Engineering services that the consultant received in the last three fiscal periods. • The number of states in which the consultant does business is . • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is . • Audit history of the consultant’s current and prior years (if applicable) ☐ Cognizant ICR Audit ☐ Local Gov’t ICR Audit □ Caltrans ICR Audit ☐ Federal Gov’t ICR Audit ☐ CPA ICR Audit
I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the Indirect Cost Rate Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.

Name**: _ Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number**:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President, a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information used to establish the indirect cost rate.

Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own Exhibit 10-K forms.

Caltrans will not process local agency’s invoices until a complete Exhibit 10-K form is accepted and approved by Caltrans Audits and Investigations.

Distribution: 1) Original - Local Agency Project File
2) Copy - Consultant
3) Copy - Caltrans Audits and Investigations

Page 2 of 2 ends

March 2018

Page 304 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
EXHIBIT 10-O2 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT

1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal:

3. Project Description:

4. Project Location:

5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE:  7. Total Contract Award Amount:

8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: 9. Total Number of ALL Subconsultants:

10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied

11. DBE
Certification
Number

12. DBE Contact Information

13. DBE
Dollar
Amount
Local Agency to Complete this Section

14. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION
$20. Local Agency Contract
Number:

21. Federal-Aid Project Number:

22. Contract Execution
Date:

Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate.

23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date

25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone

27. Local Agency Representative's Title
%
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.

15. Preparer's Signature 16. Date

17. Preparer's Name 18. Phone

19. Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original – Local Agency

2. Copy – Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract.

ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654- 6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Page 1 of 2 ends

July 23, 2015

Page 305 of 755 ends

Internal Control Questionnaire for Consulting Engineers ( Versi on: 2016- 01 ) AASHTO Uniform Auditing & Accounting Guide (2015 Edition) – APPENDIX B Page B-1 Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) for Consulting Engineers

Name of Engineering Consultant (“the Company”):

TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number):

Headquarters Address:

Company Website:

Fiscal Year End:

This ICQ was prepared for (DOT/agency name):

Time Period Covered:

Location of Accounting Records:

- Please include the following items as attachments to this ICQ:
 FAR Part 31 Overhead Audit Report for most recent fiscal year, including audited Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits, and General Overhead (hereinafter “Indirect Cost Rate Schedule”) and related reconciliation to the financial statements.
 Cognizant audit report or cognizant letter of concurrence from the cognizant Government agency.

Check here if not applicable:
 Post-closing trial balance and financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows) for the most recent fiscal year. (Note: If the indirect cost rate schedule does not directly tie to the trial balance, then please provide a supplemental reconciliation schedule.)  Current chart of accounts that ties to financial statements and indirect cost rate schedule.  Independent Auditor’s Report on financial statements and accompanying management letter.

Check here if not applicable:
 Sample timesheet.
 The Company’s policies for vacation and sick leave.
 The Company’s bonus policy.
 Other written policies, as requested throughout this ICQ.

Note: Throughout this ICQ, all references to “AASHTO Guide” pertain to the 2015 Edition of the AASHTO Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide.
- Please identify the Company’s primary contact for accounting questions:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Mailing address (if different than headquarters address listed above):

A. Background Information
A.1. Year Established. When was the Company formed?
A.2. Business Form. What form of business entity is the Company? Sole Proprietorship Partnership C Corporation S Corporation Other

Page 306 of 755 ends

Prevailing Wage Policy:

The Company performs work subject to prevailing wage, and employees are paid directly prevailing wage compensation, including deltas, according to the employee labor category and the wage determination issued by California Department of Industrial Relations.

The Company has elected to use the Direct Labor Cost method to account for prevailing wage delta cost to establish Fringe Benefit and General Overhead Rates as detailed in the following document included with the Cost Proposal.

Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits & General Overhead and Independent Auditor’s Report for TRC Companies, Inc. dated June 30, 2023. Reference is made to

Page 7 ends

The Company uses the same accounting method as noted to establish both the Fringe Benefit and General Overhead Rates, and subsequently the method has been elected in accounting for related Delta Base and Delta Fringe.

To the best of my knowledge, under the penalty of perjury, the statements above are true and correct.

Jill L. Jelley, Assistant Controller, TRC Companies, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2024

Page 307 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-U
Consultant Management Conflict of Interest Statement

Page 1 of 3 ends

LPP 17-01 January 2018
EXHIBIT 10-U CONSULTANT IN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ROLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT1

RFP/RFQ PROCUREMENT NUMBERS (if applicable):

PROJECT NAME (and FPN, if applicable)2:

APPLICABILITY: To be filled out by local agency consultants in management support role.

□ I am an employee of a consultant under contract to the local agency that is responsible for the procuring and administering of one or more consultant contracts containing either Federal or State funds.

□ I am in a management position with the local agency, my title is listed below and I have attached my duty statement and scope of work.

□ I hereby certify as follows:

1. I recuse myself from all potential conflicts of interest.

2. I will not directly or indirectly participate in, manage, or oversee any consultant selection procurement process in which the consulting firm of which I am employed is competing as a consultant or subconsultant.

3. I will not directly or indirectly influence any employee, staff member, or other individual participating in any consultant selection procurement process in which the consulting firm of which I am employed is as a consultant or subconsultant.

4. I will not directly or indirectly participate in, manage, or oversee any local agency contract that is with the consulting firm of which I am employed, regardless of whether the involvement of my employer in the contract is as a consultant or subconsultant.

Among other things, this includes my not being involved in approving changes in the schedule, scope, deliverables or invoices.

5. I understand that if I am involved in any local agency contract that is with the consulting firm of which I am employed, in violation of 1. or 2. above, that local agency contract will no longer be eligible for Federal or State reimbursement because of my involvement.

□ I certify that I have read and understand my responsibilities per 23 CFR 172.7(b)(5)

□ I fully understand that it is unlawful for a person to utilize any organization name (i.e. local agency) or auxiliary organization information, which is not a matter of public record, for personal gain.

1 Each consultant staff working in a management support role shall complete a separate form. 2 For on-call contracts or contracts for multiple projects, indicate accordingly.

Page 308 of 755 ends

March 18, 2024

HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
2024

LABOR RATES

Personnel Classification Hourly Rate

Principal-In-Charge $ 340 .00
Senior Project Manager $ 32 0.00
Project Manager $ 280.00
Project Engineer $ 21 0.00
Senior Engineer $ 18 0.00
Engineer II $ 15 0.00
Engineer I $ 120 .00
CADD Supervisor $ 160 .00
CADD Technician $ 1 20.00
Data Processor/Operator $ 85.00
Administrative Assistant $ 85.00
Intern $ 50 .00

Rates are subject to change annually starting on January 1, 2025, with anticipated increases equivalent to the prevailing rate of inflation at such times.

Similarly titled staff will be billed at equivalent rates (e.g. Senior Scientist, Senior Geologist, Senior Environmental Planner, etc. will be billed at the hourly rate for a Senior Engineer)

DIRECT EXPENSE UNIT RATES

Mileage: Current IRS Mileage Rate
Per Diem: Current State of CA DPA Rates
Subconsultants: 5% markup

Other direct costs including travel, lodging, telephone, fax, reproduction, and postage will be billed at actual cost. Rental cars may be used, in which case such charges and fuel would be billed in lieu of mileage.

Page 309 of 755 ends

RFP 2025-02
Addendum No. 01

Page 1 of 1 ends

ADDENDUM NO. 01

Issued: Thursday, August 22, 2024
Project: On-Call A&E Consultant Services
RFP No.: 2025-02
Proposals Due: Thursday, September 12, 2024 @ 2:00 p.m.

Addendum No. 01 is being issued to provide answers to submitted questions. This addendum becomes part of the Contract Documents for the project mentioned above and must be signed and submitted with the Proposal.

QUESTIONS/RESPONSES

Q.1 Will the City Consider extending the submission deadline by two weeks?

Response: The City will maintain the September 12th submission deadline. The current on -call contracts are approaching their expiration date, and due to upcoming holidays, many of the council meetings where contracts could be awarded will not occur. As a result, the City is on a very tight timeline and cannot extend the submission deadline.

PROPOSER ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDUM NO. 1
Purchasing Division

Proposer to sign and submit with proposal.

Firm: Date:

By:

Signature
City of Hanford, CA Purchasing Department
900 South 10th Ave, Hanford, CA 93230

Page 310 of 755 ends

RFP 2025-02
Addendum No. 02

Page 1 of 2 ends

ADDENDUM NO. 02

Issued: Thursday, August 27, 2024
Project: On-Call A&E Consultant Services
RFP No.: 2025-02
Proposals Due: Thursday, September 12, 2024 @ 2:00 p.m.

Addendum No. 02 is being issued to provide answers to questions from the Proposer Conference. This addendum becomes part of the Contract Documents for the project mentioned above and must be signed and submitted with the Proposal.

QUESTIONS & RESPONSES:
1) Do consultants have to work on federal projects, or can they be selected to work only on local projects? a. This is not a scoring criterion. Consultants may be selected to work solely on local projects depending on their areas of expertise. For example, the City may hire a consultant specifically for local airport projects. The City does need consultants who can work on Federal projects as well. 2) Is the ASHTO process required, or is the Safe Harbor sufficient? a. This is up to the consultant and can be completed after the selection process. It does not need to be included as part of the proposal.
3) Should smaller companies team up with larger companies to provide more of the listed services? a. This is not the intent of the RFQ. Smaller companies with specialized services may submit an SOQ for their specific services. The City will select consultants based on their qualifications and the services they can provide, not on the number of services they may be able to offer. 4) Is the City interested in staff augmentation?
a. Yes, this is a service we would be interested in, particularly a PM or CM who could assist with federal projects. We are currently short-staffed, and these services would be valuable. 5) Is there a desired radius for consultants to be within? a. There is no local preference for this project. The City will not score or place emphasis on companies based on location.
6) What is the purpose of the single engineer/architect? a. This individual would serve as the main point of contact for the City. While other individuals may work on projects, this person would be the primary contact for services needed and project updates. 7) How do we submit the fees separately from the proposal on Bid-Net? a. Submit two envelopes: one for the proposal and one for the fee. Bid -Net should allow separate submissions.
8) Can we password protect the fee proposal?
a. Yes, if Bid-Net allows it.

City of Hanford, CA Purchasing Department
900 South 10th Ave, Hanford, CA 93230

Page 311 of 755 ends

RFP 2025-02
Addendum No. 02

Page 2 of 2 ends

9) Do we foresee needing building envelope (design of moisture protection) consultants? a. There are no current projects lined up, but the City may have maintenance needs on future projects.

This can certainly be included in the RFQ. The City would like to know about unique services or areas of expertise that can be provided.
10) Surveying services – how do you anticipate handling prevailing wage throughout the project? a. If Prevailing wages change throughout the contract, t he City will pay at least the minimum prevailing wage.
i. If the consultant’s fee is less than the updated minimum wage, the fee rates may be adjusted to meet the minimum wage rates outside of the yearly fee increase (consultant fees may not be increased if they already exceed the updated wage rate). ii. A fee increase can be submitted each year for overall fees from the consultant.

PROPOSER ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDUM NO. 02
Purchasing Division

Proposer to sign and submit with proposal.

Firm: Date:

By:

Signature

Page 312 of 755 ends
Page 313 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
51 CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT STATEMENT
(Submit With Proposal)

California Government Code Section 84308, also known as the “Levine Act,” can prohibit members of the Hanford City Council from participating in any action related to a “license, permit, or entitlement for use” if he or she receives any political contributions, which total more than $250 during the twelve (12) months prior to and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision on such “license, permit, or entitlement for use,” from the person or company submitting a proposal or application to the City or any person who is not directly a party to the proposal or application but who actively supports or opposes a particular decision involving a “license, permit, or other entitlement” and who has a financial interest in the decision (“Participant”).

Government Code Section 84308 defines “license, permit, or entitlement for use” as “all business, professional and land use licenses and permits and all other entitlements for use, including all entitlements for land use, all contracts (other than competit ively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), and all franchises.”

The following website contains a list of current Hanford City Council Members, https://cityofhanfordca.com/1269/City-Council. You are responsible for reviewing the names of Hanford City Council Members prior to making the following disclosure:

1. Have you, your company, any agent on behalf of you or your company, or, to the best of your actual knowledge, a Participant made any political contributions of more than $250 to a Hanford City Council Member or a candidate running for Hanford City Coun cil during the twelve (12) months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application or the anticipated date of any City Council action related to this proposal or application?

YES:_____ NO:_____

If YES, please identify the City Council Member(s) and/or candidates for Hanford City Council and date(s) of contribution in the space below:

Council Member(s) or Candidate(s) Name Date of Contribution(s):
______________________________ ________________________ ______________________________ ________________________

I declare under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Answering YES to the question above does not preclude the City of Hanford from approving a “license, permit, or entitlement for use” for you or your firm or from taking any subsequent action. It does, however, preclude the identified Hanford City Council Member(s) from participating in any actions related to the approval process.

No party, or agent to a party, to a pending proceeding involving a “license, permit, or other entitlement for use” or Participant, or agent to a Participant, shall make a contribution of more than $250 to any City Council Member(s) or City Council candidat e during the proceeding and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision is rendered by the City in the proceeding.

NOTICE: The disclosure duty under state law continues for twelve (12) months after the final decision on a “license, permit, or other entitlement for use.” If the above information regarding contributions changes during such twelve (12) month period, then the undersigned is required to update this disclosure form.

Page 314 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
52 _______________________________________ ____________________ Signature of Authorized Individual Date

_______________________________________
Printed or Typed Name of Authorized Individual

_______________________________________
Print or Type Name of Company

Page 315 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
37 FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS
This project is supported, in whole or in part, by federal funds awarded to City of Hanford by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Funds being utilized will be specified as projects are announced.

All federal procurement requirements provided in Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200 shall be in effect. In addition, the following terms and conditions apply to you, the contractor (including consultants/vendors), as a contractor of the City of Hanford.

The services performed by the awarded Contractor shall be in compliance with all applicable grantor regulations/requirements, and additional requirements specified in this document. It shall be the awarded Contractor’s responsibility to acquire and utilize the necessary manuals and guidelines that apply to the work required to complete this project. In general,

1) The contractor (including all subcontractors) must insert these contract provisions in each lower tier contracts (e.g., subcontract or sub-agreement).

2) The contractor (or subcontractor) must incorporate the applicable requirements of these contract provisions by reference for work done under any purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services.

3) The prime contractor is responsible for compliance with these contract provisions by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor, or service provider.

1. ACCESS TO RECORDS (42 CFR 420.302)
(A) The Contractor agrees to provide the City of Hanford, the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Comptroller General of the United States, HHS, or any of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. The Contractor agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed and agrees to cooperate with all such requests. (B) The Contractor agrees to provide the Treasury Department or authorized representatives access to construction or other work sites pertaining to the work being completed under the contract. (C) No language in this contract is intended to prohibit audits or internal reviews by the Treasury Department or the Comptroller General of the United States.

2. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITES ACT COMPLIANCE (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq) By submission of a bid, the BIDDER, certifies it will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C., 12101 et. seq., and will maintain compliance throughout the life of this Contract, Agreement, or Purchase Order. By commencing performance of the work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Americans with Disabilities Act compliance.

3. BIDDER’S STATEMENT ON PREVIOUS CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE (EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)
The BIDDER shall complete the following statement by checking the appropriate blanks:

The BIDDER has has not participated in a previous contract subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity Clause prescribed by Executive Order 11246, as amended, of September 24, 1965.

Page 316 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
38 The BIDDER has has not submitted all compliance reports in connection with any such contract due under the applicable filing requirements; and that representations indicating submission of required compliance reports signed by proposed sub-BIDDERS will be awarded prior to award of subcontracts.

If the BIDDER has participated in previous contracts subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity Clause and has not submitted compliance reports due under applicable filing requirements, the BIDDER shall submit a compliance report on Standard Form 100 “Emp loyee Information Report EEO -1” prior to award of this contract, agreement, or purchase order.

Note: Failure to complete the blanks may be grounds for rejecting the bid.

4. BONDING REQUIREMENTS (2 CFR 200.326)
The BIDDER acknowledges the requirement for construction or facility improvement contracts, agreements, or purchase orders or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The City of Hanford accepts the bonding policy and requirements in compliance with Federal guidelines as set forth below:
(A) A Bid Guarantee from each bidder equivalent to 10% of the bid price. The Bid Guarantee must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the BIDDER will, upon acceptance of the BID, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.
(B) A Performance Bond on the part of the CONTRACTOR for 100% of the contract price. A Performance Bond is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor’s requirements under such contract.
(C) A Payment Bond on the part of the CONTRACTOR for 100% of the contract price. A Payment Bond is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.

5. BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA ACT (2 CFR 200.1 – IIJA; 49 U.S.C. 5323(J); 49 CFR 661) Contractor should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of this section:
(A) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (B) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non- ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

6. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT (31 U.S.C. § 1352, as amended) Contractor certifies that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Contractor shall also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certification(s) to the awarding agency.

Page 317 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
39 7. CERTIFICATE OF NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES (FAR 52.222-23) (A) “Segregated facilities”, as used in this provision, means any waiting rooms, work areas, restrooms and washrooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees, that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin, because of habit, local custom, or otherwise. (B) By the submission of a bid, the Bidder certifies that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services a t any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The BIDDER agrees that a breach of this certification is a violation of the Equal Opportunity clause in the contract, agreement, or purchase order.
(C) By submission of the bid, the Bidder further agrees that (except where it has obtained identical certification from proposed SUBCONTRACTORS for specific time periods) it will:
i. Obtain identical certification from proposed SUBCONTRACTORS before the award of subcontracts under which the SUBBIDDER will be subject to the Equal Opportunity clause; ii. Retain such certifications in its files; and
iii. Forward this certification and the following notice to the proposed SUBCONTRACTORS:

NOTICE OF PROSPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTORS OF REQUIREMENT FOR

CERTIFICATION OF NON-SEGREGATED FACILITIES
A certificate of Nonsegregated Facilities must be submitted before the award of a subcontract under which the SUBCONTRACTOR will be subject to the Equal Opportunity clause. The certification may be submitted either for each SUBCONTRACTOR for all subcontrac ts during a period (i.e. quarterly, semi-annually, or annually).
(D) By commencing performance of the contract work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Nonsegregated Facilities provisions above.

8. CERTIFICATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS The BIDDER hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the federal requirements, regulations, policies, guidelines, and requirements with respect to the acceptance and use of Federal Funds for this federally assisted project.

9. CERIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING (31 CFR Part 21)
The BIDDER certifies, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:
(A) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

(B) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.

(C) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be include in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject

Page 318 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
40 to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The BIDDER certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the BIDDER understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Ch. 38, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and disclosure, if any.

10. CLEAN AIR ACT (42 U.S.C. 7401 -7671) & FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387; 49 CFR 18.36) (applies to purchases of more than$150,000) (A) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (B) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (C) The Contractor agrees to report each violation of the Clean Air Act and the Water Pollution Control Act to the City of Hanford and understands and agrees that the City will report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.
(D) Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance.

11. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT (40 U.S.C. 327 through 333) (applies only to purchases over $100,000, when laborers or mechanics are used) Where applicable, all contracts in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers shall include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5). Under Section 3702 of the Act, each contractor shall be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard workweek of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard workweek is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than 1 1/2 times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the workweek. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction work and provides that no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence.

12. COPELAND “ANTI-KICKBACK” ACT (40 U.S.C. 3145)
CONTRACTOR must comply with the Copeland ‘‘Anti‐Kickback’’ Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, ‘‘Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States’’). Under the Copeland ‘‘Anti‐ Kickback’’ Act, the CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors are prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The CITY must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

13. DAVIS-BACON ACT, AS AMENDED (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148)
Applies to purchases for construction services in excess of $2,000. The Contractor must comply with the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141 -3144 and 3146 -3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations. In accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, the Contractor is required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate of not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the U.S. Secretary of Labor. In addition, the Contractor is required to pay wages not less than once per week. The City must provide Contractor

Page 319 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
41 with a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the U.S. Department of Labor with respect to the services to be provided under the subject Agreement. The Contractor’s execution of the subject Agreement constitutes the Contractor’s acceptance of the wage determination. The City must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal Awarding Agency.

14. DOMESTIC PREFERENCE STATEMENT (2 CFR 200.322)
As appropriate and to the extent consistent with the law, the BIDDER should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference to the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produce in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts, agreements, and purchase orders for work or products under this award.

15. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (2 CFR 180; 49 CFR 29, 18.35) (A) This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 CFR pt. 180 and 2 CFR pt. 3000. As such, the Contractor is required to verify that none of Contractor’s principals (defined at 2 CFR § 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 CFR § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 CFR § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 CFR § 180.935).
(B) The Contractor must comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (C) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the City of Hanford. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the C ity, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.
(D) The Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The Contractor further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.
(E) (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) — By execution of this Agreement, CONTRAC TOR certifies to the CITY that it is not a party listed on the government‐wide exclusions list in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), ‘‘Debarment and Suspension,’’ and is not debarred, suspended, or oth erwise excluded from the award of a federally‐supported contract un der statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549.

16. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The BIDDER certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug - free workplace. The BIDDER will:
(A) Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). (B) Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees of all the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
ii. The person’s or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, iii. Any available counselling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. (C) Provide as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed contract, agreement, grant, or purchase order:
i. Will receive a copy of the company’s drug-free workplace policy statement, and ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the company’s statement as a condition of employment on the

Page 320 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
42 contract, agreement, grant, or purchase order.
(D) At the elections of the BIDDER or CONTRACTOR, from and after the “Date Executed” and until __________ (NOT TO EXCEED 36 MONTHS), the government agency will regard this certificate as valid for all contracts, agreements, grants, or purchase orders entered into between the BIDDER and this government agency without requiring the BIDDER to provide a new and individual certificate for each contract, agreement, or purchase order. If the BIDDER elects to fill in the blank date, then the terms and conditions of thi s certificate were separately, specifically, and individually provided for each contract, agreement, or purchase order between the BIDDER and this government agency.

17. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)
Contractor shall comply with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by EO 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and as supplemented by regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.”

Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, if this Agreement meets the definition of ‘‘federally assisted construction contract’’ in 41 CFR Part 60–1.3, then during the performance of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR agrees as follows:

(A) The CONTRACTOR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, d emotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
(B) The CONTRACTOR will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on be‐ half of the CONTRACTOR, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (C) The CONTRACTOR will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the CONTRACTOR’S legal duty to furnish information.
(D) The CONTRACTOR will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the CONTRACTOR’S commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (E) The CONTRACTOR will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (F) The CONTRACTOR will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor

Page 321 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
43 for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (G) In the event of the CONTRACTOR’S noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the CONTRACTOR may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be im‐ posed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(H) The CONTRACTOR will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The CONTRACTOR will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the CITY may direct as a means of enforcing such pro‐ visions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event CONTRACTOR becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub‐contractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the CITY, then the CONTRACTOR may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. The CITY further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment prac tices when it participates in federally assisted construction work.
(I) The CITY agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant ord ers of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance. The CITY further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the CITY agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspen d in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the CITY under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the CITY; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

18. SEAT BELT USE IN THE UNITED STATES (EXECUTIVE ORDER 13043 & 62 CFR 19217) Contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt policies and programs for your employees when operating company-owned, rented or personally owned vehicles.

19. IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION (PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 2200 et seq.)
As required by California Public Contract Code Section 2204, the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR’S status in regard to the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 (Public Contract Code Section 2200 et seq) is true and correct:
___ (A) The BIDDER/CONTRACTOR is not:
i. Identified on the current list of persons and entities engaged in investment activities in Iran prepared

Page 322 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
44 by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203; or
ii. A financial institution that extends for 45 days or more, credit in the amount of $20,000,000 or more to any other person or entity identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) Public Contract Code Section 2203, if that person or entity uses or will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran. ___ (B) The City has exempted the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR from the requirements of the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 after making a public finding that, absent the exemption, the City will be unable to obtain the goods and/or services to be provided pursuant to the contract, agreement, or purchase order.
___ (C) The amount of the contract, agreement, or purchase order payable to the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR for the project does not exceed $1,000,000 over the life of the contract, agreement, or purchase order (up to 5 years).

Note: In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 2205, false certification of this form shall be reported to the California Attorney General and may result in civil penalties equal to the greater of $250,000 or twice the contract, agreement, or purchase order amount, termination of the contract, agreement, or purchase order amount, and/or eligibility to bid on contracts for three years.

20. MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (EXEC ORDERS 11625, 12138, and 12432) Contractor hereby agrees to comply with the following when applicable: The requirements of Executive Orders 11625 and 12432 (concerning Minority Business Enterprise), and 12138 (concerning Women's Business Enterprise). Accordingly, the Contractor hereby agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that women and minority businesses are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment, construction, and services. Affirmative steps shall include the following:

(A) Including qualified women’s business enterprises and small and minority businesses on solicitation lists. (B) Assuring that women’s enterprises and small and minority businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources.
(C) When economically feasible, dividing total requirements into smaller tasks or quantities so as to permit maximum participation by small and minority business, and women’s business enterprises. (D) Where the requirement permits, establishing delivery schedules which will encourage participation by women’s business enterprises and small and minority businesses. (E) Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration, and the U.S. Office of Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and (F) If any subcontracts are to be let, requiring the prime Contractor to take the affirmative steps in (A) - (E) above.

For the purposes of these requirements, a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) is defined as an enterprise that is at least 51 percent owned and controlled in its daily operation by members of the following groups: Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian, or Alaskan Natives. A Women Business Enterprise (WBE) is defined as an enterprise that is at least 51 percent owned and controlled in its daily operation by women.

21. NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (CALIFORNIA PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 7106) The BIDDER certifies, under the PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the below statement is true and correct:

That the BID is not made in the interest of, or on the behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the BID is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham BID, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham BID, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by

Page 323 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
45 agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER of any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract, agreement, or purchase order; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any break down thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham BID.

22. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal Government is not a party to this contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non-Federal entity, Contractor, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the contract.

23. PROCUREMENT OF RECOVERED MATERIALS (2 CFR 200.323)
(A) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired:
i. Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule. ii. Meeting contract performance requirements; or
iii. At a reasonable price.
(B) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site:
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. (C) Contractor agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 - Solid Waste Disposal Act.

24. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS & VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (Huawei and ZTE) (FAR 52.204-25) Contractor is prohibited from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to:
(A) Procure or obtain.
(B) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or (C) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115–232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (i) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (ii) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
(iii) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonabl y believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.

25. RECORDS RETENTION (2 CFR 200.334-337)
(A) Contractor must retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other of its records pertinent to this Agreement for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final

Page 324 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
46 expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or CITY. The only exceptions to the three-year limit are the following:

i. If any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the 3-year period, then the records must be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken.
ii. When the Contractor is notified in writing by the City or Federal awarding agency, cognizant agency for audit, oversight agency for audit, or cognizant agency for indirect costs to extend the retention period.
iii. Records for real property and equipment acquired with Federal funds must be retained for 3 years after final disposition.
iv. When records are transferred to or maintained by the City or Federal awarding agency, the 3 -year retention requirement is not applicable to the Contractor.

26. REDUCING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING (EXECUTIVE ORDER 13513-13513 FR 51225) Contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving and establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers.

27. RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT (37 CFR 401) Contracts or agreements for the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work shall provide for the rights of the Federal Government and the recipient in any resulting invention in accordance with 37 CFR part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any applicable implementing regulations.

28. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE (CALIF LABOR CODE SECT 3700) The BIDDER acknowledges that they are aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work under this contract, agreement, or purchase order.

29. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS

Notice is hereby given that this is a Public Works Project and is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code, the City of Hanford has ascertained that the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the work being done is as per State of California, County of Kings wage scale that are current and online with the State of California Division of Industrial Relations (DIR) at: https://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Prevailing-Wage.html.

The Contractor to whom the contract is awarded shall pay not less than the specified wages to all workmen employed in the execution of the contract. Each Contractor awarded a contract must have an agent of the firm to sign documents required by the Califor nia Labor Code and to receive proper state forms for the reporting of certified payroll. Except as may be otherwise required by law, all claims and disputes pertaining to the classification of labor employed on the Project under the Contract Documents shal l be decided by the District’s Labor Compliance Officer.

Page 325 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
47 Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to supersede any applicable laws, orders or regulations issued by competent authority governing wages, hours of work of the employment of labor, nor to condone any violation of such laws, orders or regulations.

The Contractor shall post at appropriate conspicuous weatherproof points on the site of the Project a schedule showing the Prevailing Wage Determinations published by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations that are applicable to the Project.

Pursuant to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2 of the CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE at SECTION 1770, et seq ., the City has obtained from the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the prevailing rate for straight time, holiday time and overtime work in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the contract, a copy of which is available in the office of the City Engineer.

There shall be paid to each worker of the Contractor or any subcontractor, of any tier, engaged in the work not less than the general prevailing wage rate, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the Contractor or a ny subcontractor, of any tier, and such worker. The Contractor and subcontractors will be required to pay all workers on a weekly basis and to submit the certified payrolls to the Labor Compliance Office weekly.

Contractors shall maintain payrolls and basic records (e.g., timecards, canceled checks, cash receipts, trust fund forms, accounting ledgers, tax forms, etc.) during the course of the work and shall preserve them for a period of three (3) years for workers of all trades at the District’s project sites. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each worker, his or her classification, the rate of pay (including the rates of contributions for, or costs assumed to provide, frin ge benefits), daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made, and actual wages paid.

The prime Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the labor standards provisions are followed by its subcontractors and shall be responsible for the Labor Code violations of its subcontractors. The City, through its Labor Compliance Officer or it s designee, shall conduct periodic inspections/audits to determine whether the workers of all trades on project sites have been paid according to the prevailing wage rates.

The City, through its Labor Compliance Officer and its consultants, has the duty to enforce the Labor Code public works requirements (Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Divisions 2 and 3 of the CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE). It is the policy of the District to strictly enfor ce the public works prevailing wage requirements set for in the California Labor Code. To that end, Contractors and subcontractors that are found to be repeat violators of the Labor Code are subject to debarment from bidding on, or being awarded, any public works construction contract to the extent provided by law.

Within thirty days of approval, the City shall register the project with the Department of Industrial Relations of a Public Works Contract being awarded to the Contractor using the online electronic form PWC -100. The Contractor and all sub-contractors on the project shall provide their DIR registration numbers for verification of coverage and notification of the project. Contractors and subcontractors must submit certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner using the DIR’s electronic certified payroll reporting (eCPR) system.

Page 326 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
48 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The official named below acknowledges that they are duly authorized legally to bind the Bidder/Contractor to the certifications previously listed. They acknowledge that they are fully aware that this certification, executed on the date below, is made under penalty of perjury under State of California and Federal laws.

______________________________________________________________________________

BIDDER/CONTRACTOR FIRM NAME

BIDDER/CONTRACTOR FIRM MAILING ADDRESS:

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________ FEDERAL ID NUMBER:

______________________________________________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBER & EMAIL ADDRESS

BY:

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

PRINTED NAME & TITLE

____________________________

DATE EXECUTED

Page 327 of 755 ends

GPA Forms

Page 328 of 755 ends

Calvada Forms

Page 329 of 755 ends

Peters Forms

Page 330 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
37 FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS
This project is supported, in whole or in part, by federal funds awarded to City of Hanford by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Funds being utilized will be specified as projects are announced.

All federal procurement requirements provided in Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200 shall be in effect. In addition, the following terms and conditions apply to you, the contractor (including consultants/vendors), as a contractor of the City of Hanford.

The services performed by the awarded Contractor shall be in compliance with all applicable grantor regulations/requirements, and additional requirements specified in this document. It shall be the awarded Contractor’s responsibility to acquire and utilize the necessary manuals and guidelines that apply to the work required to complete this project. In general,
1) The contractor (including all subcontractors) must insert these contract provisions in each lower tier contracts (e.g., subcontract or sub-agreement).
2) The contractor (or subcontractor) must incorporate the applicable requirements of these contract provisions by reference for work done under any purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services.
3) The prime contractor is responsible for compliance with these contract provisions by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor, or service provider.

1. ACCESS TO RECORDS (42 CFR 420.302)
(A) The Contractor agrees to provide the City of Hanford, the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Comptroller General of the United States, HHS, or any of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. The Contractor agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed and agrees to cooperate with all such requests. (B) The Contractor agrees to provide the Treasury Department or authorized representatives access to construction or other work sites pertaining to the work being completed under the contract. (C) No language in this contract is intended to prohibit audits or internal reviews by the Treasury Department or the Comptroller General of the United States.

2. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITES ACT COMPLIANCE (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq) By submission of a bid, the BIDDER, certifies it will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C., 12101 et. seq., and will maintain compliance throughout the life of this Contract, Agreement, or Purchase Order. By commencing performance of the work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Americans with Disabilities Act compliance.

3. BIDDER’S STATEMENT ON PREVIOUS CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE (EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)
The BIDDER shall complete the following statement by checking the appropriate blanks:

The BIDDER has X has not participated in a previous contract subject to the Equal Employment Opp
ortunity Clause prescribed by Executive Order 11246, as amended, of September 24, 1965.

Page 331 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
38 The BIDDER has has not submitted all compliance reports in connection with any such contract due under the applicable filing requirements; and that representations indicating submission of required compliance reports signed by proposed sub-BIDDERS will be awarded prior to award of subcontracts.

If the BIDDER has participated in previous contracts subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity Clause and has not submitted compliance reports due under applicable filing requirements, the BIDDER shall submit a compliance report on Standard Form 100 “Emp loyee Information Report EEO -1” prior to award of this contract, agreement, or purchase order.

Note: Failure to complete the blanks may be grounds for rejecting the bid.

4. BONDING REQUIREMENTS (2 CFR 200.326)
The BIDDER acknowledges the requirement for construction or facility improvement contracts, agreements, or purchase orders or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The City of Hanford accepts the bonding policy and requirements in compliance with Federal guidelines as set forth below:
(A) A Bid Guarantee from each bidder equivalent to 10% of the bid price. The Bid Guarantee must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the BIDDER will, upon acceptance of the BID, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.
(B) A Performance Bond on the part of the CONTRACTOR for 100% of the contract price. A Performance Bond is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor’s requirements under such contract.
(C) A Payment Bond on the part of the CONTRACTOR for 100% of the contract price. A Payment Bond is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.

5. BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA ACT (2 CFR 200.1 – IIJA; 49 U.S.C. 5323(J); 49 CFR 661) Contractor should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of this section:
(A) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (B) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non- ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

6. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT (31 U.S.C. § 1352, as amended) Contractor certifies that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Contractor shall also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certification(s) to the awarding agency.

X

Page 332 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
39 7. CERTIFICATE OF NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES (FAR 52.222-23) (A) “Segregated facilities”, as used in this provision, means any waiting rooms, work areas, restrooms and washrooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees, that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin, because of habit, local custom, or otherwise. (B) By the submission of a bid, the Bidder certifies that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services a t any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The BIDDER agrees that a breach of this certification is a violation of the Equal Opportunity clause in the contract, agreement, or purchase order.
(C) By submission of the bid, the Bidder further agrees that (except where it has obtained identical certification from proposed SUBCONTRACTORS for specific time periods) it will:
i. Obtain identical certification from proposed SUBCONTRACTORS before the award of subcontracts under which the SUBBIDDER will be subject to the Equal Opportunity clause; ii. Retain such certifications in its files; and
iii. Forward this certification and the following notice to the proposed SUBCONTRACTORS:

NOTICE OF PROSPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTORS OF REQUIREMENT FOR

CERTIFICATION OF NON-SEGREGATED FACILITIES
A certificate of Nonsegregated Facilities must be submitted before the award of a subcontract under which the SUBCONTRACTOR will be subject to the Equal Opportunity clause. The certification may be submitted either for each SUBCONTRACTOR for all subcontrac ts during a period (i.e. quarterly, semi-annually, or annually).
(D) By commencing performance of the contract work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Nonsegregated Facilities provisions above.

8. CERTIFICATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS The BIDDER hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the federal requirements, regulations, policies, guidelines, and requirements with respect to the acceptance and use of Federal Funds for this federally assisted project.

9. CERIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING (31 CFR Part 21)
The BIDDER certifies, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:
(A) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (B) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(C) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be include in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject

Page 333 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
40 to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The BIDDER certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the BIDDER understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Ch. 38, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and disclosure, if any.

10. CLEAN AIR ACT (42 U.S.C. 7401 -7671) & FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387; 49 CFR 18.36) (applies to purchases of more than$150,000) (A) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (B) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (C) The Contractor agrees to report each violation of the Clean Air Act and the Water Pollution Control Act to the City of Hanford and understands and agrees that the City will report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.
(D) Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance.

11. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT (40 U.S.C. 327 through 333) (applies only to purchases over $100,000, when laborers or mechanics are used) Where applicable, all contracts in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers shall include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5). Under Section 3702 of the Act, each contractor shall be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard workweek of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard workweek is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than 1 1/2 times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the workweek. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction work and provides that no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence.

12. COPELAND “ANTI-KICKBACK” ACT (40 U.S.C. 3145)
CONTRACTOR must comply with the Copeland ‘‘Anti‐Kickback’’ Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, ‘‘Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States’’). Under the Copeland ‘‘Anti‐ Kickback’’ Act, the CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors are prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The CITY must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

13. DAVIS-BACON ACT, AS AMENDED (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148)
Applies to purchases for construction services in excess of $2,000. The Contractor must comply with the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141 -3144 and 3146 -3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations. In accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, the Contractor is required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate of not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the U.S. Secretary of Labor. In addition, the Contractor is required to pay wages not less than once per week. The City must provide Contractor

Page 334 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
41 with a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the U.S. Department of Labor with respect to the services to be provided under the subject Agreement. The Contractor’s execution of the subject Agreement constitutes the Contractor’s acceptance of the wage determination. The City must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal Awarding Agency.

14. DOMESTIC PREFERENCE STATEMENT (2 CFR 200.322)
As appropriate and to the extent consistent with the law, the BIDDER should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference to the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produce in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts, agreements, and purchase orders for work or products under this award.

15. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (2 CFR 180; 49 CFR 29, 18.35) (A) This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 CFR pt. 180 and 2 CFR pt. 3000. As such, the Contractor is required to verify that none of Contractor’s principals (defined at 2 CFR § 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 CFR § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 CFR § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 CFR § 180.935).
(B) The Contractor must comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (C) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the City of Hanford. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the C ity, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.
(D) The Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The Contractor further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.
(E) (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) — By execution of this Agreement, CONTRAC TOR certifies to the CITY that it is not a party listed on the government‐wide exclusions list in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), ‘‘Debarment and Suspension,’’ and is not debarred, suspended, or oth erwise excluded from the award of a federally‐supported contract un der statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549.

16. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The BIDDER certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug - free workplace. The BIDDER will:
(A) Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). (B) Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees of all the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
ii. The person’s or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, iii. Any available counselling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. (C) Provide as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed contract, agreement, grant, or purchase order:
i. Will receive a copy of the company’s drug-free workplace policy statement, and ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the company’s statement as a condition of employment on the

Page 335 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
42 contract, agreement, grant, or purchase order.
(D) At the elections of the BIDDER or CONTRACTOR, from and after the “Date Executed” and until __________ (NOT TO EXCEED 36 MONTHS), the government agency will regard this certificate as valid for all contracts, agreements, grants, or purchase orders entered into between the BIDDER and this government agency without requiring the BIDDER to provide a new and individual certificate for each contract, agreement, or purchase order. If the BIDDER elects to fill in the blank date, then the terms and conditions of thi s certificate were separately, specifically, and individually provided for each contract, agreement, or purchase order between the BIDDER and this government agency.

17. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)
Contractor shall comply with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by EO 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and as supplemented by regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.”
Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, if this Agreement meets the definition of ‘‘federally assisted construction contract’’ in 41 CFR Part 60–1.3, then during the performance of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR agrees as follows:
(A) The CONTRACTOR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, d emotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
(B) The CONTRACTOR will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on be‐ half of the CONTRACTOR, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (C) The CONTRACTOR will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the CONTRACTOR’S legal duty to furnish information.
(D) The CONTRACTOR will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the CONTRACTOR’S commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (E) The CONTRACTOR will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (F) The CONTRACTOR will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor

Page 336 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
43 for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (G) In the event of the CONTRACTOR’S noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the CONTRACTOR may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be im‐ posed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(H) The CONTRACTOR will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The CONTRACTOR will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the CITY may direct as a means of enforcing such pro‐ visions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event CONTRACTOR becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub‐contractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the CITY, then the CONTRACTOR may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. The CITY further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment prac tices when it participates in federally assisted construction work.
(I) The CITY agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant ord ers of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance. The CITY further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the CITY agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspen d in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the CITY under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the CITY; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

18. SEAT BELT USE IN THE UNITED STATES (EXECUTIVE ORDER 13043 & 62 CFR 19217) Contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt policies and programs for your employees when operating company-owned, rented or personally owned vehicles.

19. IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION (PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 2200 et seq.)
As required by California Public Contract Code Section 2204, the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR’S status in regard to the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 (Public Contract Code Section 2200 et seq) is true and correct:
___ (A) The BIDDER/CONTRACTOR is not:
i. Identified on the current list of persons and entities engaged in investment activities in Iran prepared X

Page 337 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
44 by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203; or
ii. A financial institution that extends for 45 days or more, credit in the amount of $20,000,000 or more to any other person or entity identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) Public Contract Code Section 2203, if that person or entity uses or will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran. ___ (B) The City has exempted the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR from the requirements of the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 after making a public finding that, absent the exemption, the City will be unable to obtain the goods and/or services to be provided pursuant to the contract, agreement, or purchase order.
___ (C) The amount of the contract, agreement, or purchase order payable to the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR for the project does not exceed $1,000,000 over the life of the contract, agreement, or purchase order (up to 5 years).

Note: In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 2205, false certification of this form shall be reported to the California Attorney General and may result in civil penalties equal to the greater of $250,000 or twice the contract, agreement, or purchase order amount, termination of the contract, agreement, or purchase order amount, and/or eligibility to bid on contracts for three years.

20. MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (EXEC ORDERS 11625, 12138, and 12432) Contractor hereby agrees to comply with the following when applicable: The requirements of Executive Orders 11625 and 12432 (concerning Minority Business Enterprise), and 12138 (concerning Women's Business Enterprise). Accordingly, the Contractor hereby agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that women and minority businesses are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment, construction, and services. Affirmative steps shall include the following:
(A) Including qualified women’s business enterprises and small and minority businesses on solicitation lists. (B) Assuring that women’s enterprises and small and minority businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources.
(C) When economically feasible, dividing total requirements into smaller tasks or quantities so as to permit maximum participation by small and minority business, and women’s business enterprises. (D) Where the requirement permits, establishing delivery schedules which will encourage participation by women’s business enterprises and small and minority businesses. (E) Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration, and the U.S. Office of Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and (F) If any subcontracts are to be let, requiring the prime Contractor to take the affirmative steps in (A) - (E) above.

For the purposes of these requirements, a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) is defined as an enterprise that is at least 51 percent owned and controlled in its daily operation by members of the following groups: Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian, or Alaskan Natives. A Women Business Enterprise (WBE) is defined as an enterprise that is at least 51 percent owned and controlled in its daily operation by women.

21. NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (CALIFORNIA PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 7106) The BIDDER certifies, under the PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the below statement is true and correct:

That the BID is not made in the interest of, or on the behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the BID is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham BID, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham BID, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by

Page 338 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
45 agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER of any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract, agreement, or purchase order; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any break down thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham BID.

22. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal Government is not a party to this contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non-Federal entity, Contractor, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the contract.

23. PROCUREMENT OF RECOVERED MATERIALS (2 CFR 200.323)
(A) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired:
i. Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule. ii. Meeting contract performance requirements; or
iii. At a reasonable price.
(B) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site:
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. (C) Contractor agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 - Solid Waste Disposal Act.

24. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS & VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (Huawei and ZTE) (FAR 52.204-25) Contractor is prohibited from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to:
(A) Procure or obtain.
(B) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or (C) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115–232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (i) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (ii) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
(iii) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonabl y believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.

25. RECORDS RETENTION (2 CFR 200.334-337)
(A) Contractor must retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other of its records pertinent to this Agreement for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final

Page 339 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
46 expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or CITY. The only exceptions to the three-year limit are the following:
i. If any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the 3-year period, then the records must be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken.
ii. When the Contractor is notified in writing by the City or Federal awarding agency, cognizant agency for audit, oversight agency for audit, or cognizant agency for indirect costs to extend the retention period.
iii. Records for real property and equipment acquired with Federal funds must be retained for 3 years after final disposition.
iv. When records are transferred to or maintained by the City or Federal awarding agency, the 3 -year retention requirement is not applicable to the Contractor.

26. REDUCING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING (EXECUTIVE ORDER 13513-13513 FR 51225) Contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving and establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers.

27. RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT (37 CFR 401) Contracts or agreements for the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work shall provide for the rights of the Federal Government and the recipient in any resulting invention in accordance with 37 CFR part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any applicable implementing regulations.

28. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE (CALIF LABOR CODE SECT 3700) The BIDDER acknowledges that they are aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work under this contract, agreement, or purchase order.

29. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS Notice is hereby given that this is a Public Works Project and is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code, the City of Hanford has ascertained that the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the work being done is as per State of California, County of Kings wage scale that are current and online with the State of California Division of Industrial Relations (DIR) at: https://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Prevailing-Wage.html.

The Contractor to whom the contract is awarded shall pay not less than the specified wages to all workmen employed in the execution of the contract. Each Contractor awarded a contract must have an agent of the firm to sign documents required by the Califor nia Labor Code and to receive proper state forms for the reporting of certified payroll. Except as may be otherwise required by law, all claims and disputes pertaining to the classification of labor employed on the Project under the Contract Documents shal l be decided by the District’s Labor Compliance Officer.

Page 340 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
47 Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to supersede any applicable laws, orders or regulations issued by competent authority governing wages, hours of work of the employment of labor, nor to condone any violation of such laws, orders or regulations.

The Contractor shall post at appropriate conspicuous weatherproof points on the site of the Project a schedule showing the Prevailing Wage Determinations published by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations that are applicable to the Project.

Pursuant to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2 of the CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE at SECTION 1770, et seq ., the City has obtained from the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the prevailing rate for straight time, holiday time and overtime work in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the contract, a copy of which is available in the office of the City Engineer.

There shall be paid to each worker of the Contractor or any subcontractor, of any tier, engaged in the work not less than the general prevailing wage rate, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the Contractor or a ny subcontractor, of any tier, and such worker. The Contractor and subcontractors will be required to pay all workers on a weekly basis and to submit the certified payrolls to the Labor Compliance Office weekly.

Contractors shall maintain payrolls and basic records (e.g., timecards, canceled checks, cash receipts, trust fund forms, accounting ledgers, tax forms, etc.) during the course of the work and shall preserve them for a period of three (3) years for workers of all trades at the District’s project sites. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each worker, his or her classification, the rate of pay (including the rates of contributions for, or costs assumed to provide, frin ge benefits), daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made, and actual wages paid.

The prime Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the labor standards provisions are followed by its subcontractors and shall be responsible for the Labor Code violations of its subcontractors. The City, through its Labor Compliance Officer or it s designee, shall conduct periodic inspections/audits to determine whether the workers of all trades on project sites have been paid according to the prevailing wage rates.

The City, through its Labor Compliance Officer and its consultants, has the duty to enforce the Labor Code public works requirements (Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Divisions 2 and 3 of the CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE). It is the policy of the District to strictly enfor ce the public works prevailing wage requirements set for in the California Labor Code. To that end, Contractors and subcontractors that are found to be repeat violators of the Labor Code are subject to debarment from bidding on, or being awarded, any public works construction contract to the extent provided by law.

Within thirty days of approval, the City shall register the project with the Department of Industrial Relations of a Public Works Contract being awarded to the Contractor using the online electronic form PWC -100. The Contractor and all sub-contractors on the project shall provide their DIR registration numbers for verification of coverage and notification of the project. Contractors and subcontractors must submit certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner using the DIR’s electronic certified payroll reporting (eCPR) system.

Page 341 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
48 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The official named below acknowledges that they are duly authorized legally to bind the Bidder/Contractor to the certifications previously listed. They acknowledge that they are fully aware that this certification, executed on the date below, is made under penalty of perjury under State of California and Federal laws.
______________________________________________________________________________

BIDDER/CONTRACTOR FIRM NAME
BIDDER/CONTRACTOR FIRM MAILING ADDRESS:
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ FEDERAL ID NUMBER:
______________________________________________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBER & EMAIL ADDRESS
BY:
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________

PRINTED NAME & TITLE
____________________________

DATE EXECUTED
Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Avenue, Clovis, CA 93612
559-299-1544
[email protected]
David Peters, President
9/10/2024

Page 342 of 755 ends

COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one-time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred
Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ________________________________ ________
Print Name: ________________________________ _______
Title: ________________________________ ____________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date: ___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files

Page 1 ends

NO LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

Page 343 of 755 ends

EXHIBIT 10-A

A&E CONSULTANT FINANCIAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUEST
Caltrans Division of Local Assistance
(Completed by Local Agencies, One per Contract)
(For New Proposed A&E Consultant Local Agency Contracts of $150,000 or Greater) (For Amendments, use only when there are additional subconsultants or changes in ICR) EMAIL TO:

California State Department of Transportation
Independent Office of Audits and Investigations
conformance [email protected] .gov
Date:

Federal Project Number : _______ _
Attention: Audit Manager, External Contracts-Local Agencies The following applicable documents are attached for proposed A&E Consultant Contract No. _______ at a proposed Contract or Amended amount of$ ______ ~ with ______________ _ (Prime Consultant's full legal name)
The Project Description is (Identify if an Amendment or a New Contract): ____________ _ Participation Amounts for Prime and all Sub-consultants on this contract are:

Consultant's Name
Participation
Amount
Category 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
or N/A (see below)
Caltrans ICR Acceptance
ID# (if available)
Note : Add pages if necessary. NI A applies to Consultants with participation amount less than $150,000 I verify that we have received from the prime & sub-consultants on this contract and are forwarding to A&I, the financial documents that meet A&I's minimum requirements for contracts~ $150,000* (as listed below) as well as the financial documents required under each Consultant's Category Requirements as specified in the Exhibit 10-A Checklist:

Minimum Requirements
1) A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Letter (Exhibit 10-A) - Completed for each contract, by Local Agency
2) Cost Proposals (Examples at Exhibit 10-Hl through 10-H4)-Completed by Consultants 3) Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Exhibit 10-K) - Completed by each Consultant (Except for firms requesting the Safe Harbor Rate) 4) Points of contact for Local Agency and Prime Consultant Name ______________ _ Signature _________________ _
Title _____________ _
Name of Local Agency and Department _________________________ _ Address __________________________________ _
*Consultants with multi-year Contracts that begin at $150,000 or more, with Indirect Cost Rates (ICR) that change every year are required to follow the same minimum and category requirements for each fiscal year ICR proposed.

April 2018
Peters Engineering Group will submit on Notice of Selection rather than with the intial SOQ submission.

Page 344 of 755 ends

Loc11I Aiisl ~t1111ce Procedur es M11 nu11l E~hibit to-A Chccklbt

CAL TRANS A&I FINANCIAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) CONSULTANTS

ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY CONTRACTS
All Prime & Sub-consultants must submit the following minimum requirements for contracts:::: $150,000:
1) A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Letter (Exhibit I 0-A) - Completed by Local Agency for each contract ( /) 2) Cost Proposals (Examples at Exhibit JO-HI through I0-H4) - Completed by Consultants 3) Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Exhibit l0-K) - Completed by each Consultant (except for firms requesting Safe Harbor Rate)
4) Local Agency and Prime Consultant's Points of Contact If not Categories 1-3
CATEGORY 1: CATEGORY 2: CATEGORY 3: CATEGORY 4: CATEGORYS:

Firms with Firms with Firms Requesting Contracts~ Contracts ~ SIM Cognizant Caltrans Safe Barbor Rate $1S0K to< SIM and participating Type of Financial Documents and Information Approval Letter Acceptance ID (SOR) and participating amounts ~ $1SOK for ICR FYE proposed * forlCRFYE Number for ICR amounts~ to proposed FYE proposed ** $!SOK
For all Prime and Sub-consultants
Cognizant Approval Letter for the FYE proposed (issued by cognizant state, which is based on location of Accounting Records as stated in AASHTO ✓ JCQ)
Caltrans' !CR Acceptance ID #s for !CR FYE proposed •• ✓ FAR Compliant Indirect Cost Rate (!CR) Schedule including FAR References and Disclosure Notes (2)
;tPrime Co11sultant must have a CPA Audited !CR Report if contract is ~ ✓ ✓ $ , regardless of Prime Consultant's participation amount.(2) -+- Prior Year !CR Schedule ✓
AASHTO Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) Appendix B (3) ✓ ✓ Post Closing Trial Balance (4) ✓
Vacation/Sick Policy ✓
Bonus Policy ✓
Executive Compensation Analysis (ECA) (4) ✓
Prevailing Wage (PW) Policy for PW contracts (5) ✓ ✓ ✓ *** ✓ ✓ When applicable, additional documents may be requested:

Supplemental reconciliation schedule (to tie the proposed !CR Schedule to Trial Balance) (4)
Chart of Accounts
Income Statement (4)
Labor Summary Report (6)
Related Party Rent Analysis ( 4)
Vehicle, Equipment, and Other Direct Costs Schedules (4) Safe Harbor Rate Documents:

Consultant Certification of Eligibility of Contract Costs and Financial Management System (Attachment IR) ✓
Additional Documents Required 2 2 2 3 8
April 20 18
Peters Engineering Group will submit on Notice of Selection rather than with the intial SOQ submission.

Page 345 of 755 ends

Internal Control Questionnaire for Consulting Engineers ( Versi on: 2016- 01 ) AASHTO Uniform Auditing & Accounting Guide (2015 Edition) – APPENDIX B Page B-1 Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) for Consulting Engineers

Name of Engineering Consultant (“the Company”):

TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number):

Headquarters Address:

Company Website:

Fiscal Year End:

This ICQ was prepared for (DOT/agency name):

Time Period Covered:

Location of Accounting Records:

- Please include the following items as attachments to this ICQ:
 FAR Part 31 Overhead Audit Report for most recent fiscal year, including audited Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits, and General Overhead (hereinafter “Indirect Cost Rate Schedule”) and related reconciliation to the financial statements.
 Cognizant audit report or cognizant letter of concurrence from the cognizant Government agency.

Check here if not applicable:
 Post-closing trial balance and financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows) for the most recent fiscal year. (Note: If the indirect cost rate schedule does not directly tie to the trial balance, then please provide a supplemental reconciliation schedule.)  Current chart of accounts that ties to financial statements and indirect cost rate schedule.  Independent Auditor’s Report on financial statements and accompanying management letter.

Check here if not applicable:
 Sample timesheet.
 The Company’s policies for vacation and sick leave.
 The Company’s bonus policy.
 Other written policies, as requested throughout this ICQ.

Note: Throughout this ICQ, all references to “AASHTO Guide” pertain to the 2015 Edition of the AASHTO Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide.
- Please identify the Company’s primary contact for accounting questions:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Mailing address (if different than headquarters address listed above):

A. Background Information
A.1. Year Established. When was the Company formed?
A.2. Business Form. What form of business entity is the Company? Sole Proprietorship Partnership C Corporation S Corporation Other
Peters Engineering Group will submit on Notice of Selection rather than with the intial submission of SOQ.

Page 346 of 755 ends

Prevailing Wage Policy

Page 347 of 755 ends
Page 348 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-U
Consultant Management Conflict of Interest Statement

Page 1 of 3 ends

LPP 17-01 January 2018
EXHIBIT 10-U CONSULTANT IN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ROLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT1

RFP/RFQ PROCUREMENT NUMBERS (if applicable):

PROJECT NAME (and FPN, if applicable)2:

APPLICABILITY: To be filled out by local agency consultants in management support role.

□ I am an employee of a consultant under contract to the local agency that is responsible for the procuring and administering of one or more consultant contracts containing either Federal or State funds.

□ I am in a management position with the local agency, my title is listed below and I have attached my duty statement and scope of work.

□ I hereby certify as follows:

1. I recuse myself from all potential conflicts of interest.

2. I will not directly or indirectly participate in, manage, or oversee any consultant selection procurement process in which the consulting firm of which I am employed is competing as a consultant or subconsultant.

3. I will not directly or indirectly influence any employee, staff member, or other individual participating in any consultant selection procurement process in which the consulting firm of which I am employed is as a consultant or subconsultant.

4. I will not directly or indirectly participate in, manage, or oversee any local agency contract that is with the consulting firm of which I am employed, regardless of whether the involvement of my employer in the contract is as a consultant or subconsultant.

Among other things, this includes my not being involved in approving changes in the schedule, scope, deliverables or invoices.

5. I understand that if I am involved in any local agency contract that is with the consulting firm of which I am employed, in violation of 1. or 2. above, that local agency contract will no longer be eligible for Federal or State reimbursement because of my involvement.

□ I certify that I have read and understand my responsibilities per 23 CFR 172.7(b)(5)

□ I fully understand that it is unlawful for a person to utilize any organization name (i.e. local agency) or auxiliary organization information, which is not a matter of public record, for personal gain.

1 Each consultant staff working in a management support role shall complete a separate form. 2 For on-call contracts or contracts for multiple projects, indicate accordingly.

Peters Engineering Group is not working in a Management Support Role so does not have a conflict.

Page 349 of 755 ends

Designlab 252
Forms

Page 350 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
37 FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS
This project is supported, in whole or in part, by federal funds awarded to City of Hanford by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Funds being utilized will be specified as projects are announced.

All federal procurement requirements provided in Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200 shall be in effect. In addition, the following terms and conditions apply to you, the contractor (including consultants/vendors), as a contractor of the City of Hanford.

The services performed by the awarded Contractor shall be in compliance with all applicable grantor regulations/requirements, and additional requirements specified in this document. It shall be the awarded Contractor’s responsibility to acquire and utilize the necessary manuals and guidelines that apply to the work required to complete this project. In general,

1) The contractor (including all subcontractors) must insert these contract provisions in each lower tier contracts (e.g., subcontract or sub-agreement).

2) The contractor (or subcontractor) must incorporate the applicable requirements of these contract provisions by reference for work done under any purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services.

3) The prime contractor is responsible for compliance with these contract provisions by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor, or service provider.

1. ACCESS TO RECORDS (42 CFR 420.302)
(A) The Contractor agrees to provide the City of Hanford, the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Comptroller General of the United States, HHS, or any of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. The Contractor agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed and agrees to cooperate with all such requests. (B) The Contractor agrees to provide the Treasury Department or authorized representatives access to construction or other work sites pertaining to the work being completed under the contract. (C) No language in this contract is intended to prohibit audits or internal reviews by the Treasury Department or the Comptroller General of the United States.

2. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITES ACT COMPLIANCE (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq) By submission of a bid, the BIDDER, certifies it will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C., 12101 et. seq., and will maintain compliance throughout the life of this Contract, Agreement, or Purchase Order. By commencing performance of the work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Americans with Disabilities Act compliance.

3. BIDDER’S STATEMENT ON PREVIOUS CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE (EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)
The BIDDER shall complete the following statement by checking the appropriate blanks:

The BIDDER has has not participated in a previous contract subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity Clause prescribed by Executive Order 11246, as amended, of September 24, 1965.

Page 351 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
38 The BIDDER has has not submitted all compliance reports in connection with any such contract due under the applicable filing requirements; and that representations indicating submission of required compliance reports signed by proposed sub-BIDDERS will be awarded prior to award of subcontracts.

If the BIDDER has participated in previous contracts subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity Clause and has not submitted compliance reports due under applicable filing requirements, the BIDDER shall submit a compliance report on Standard Form 100 “Emp loyee Information Report EEO -1” prior to award of this contract, agreement, or purchase order.

Note: Failure to complete the blanks may be grounds for rejecting the bid.

4. BONDING REQUIREMENTS (2 CFR 200.326)
The BIDDER acknowledges the requirement for construction or facility improvement contracts, agreements, or purchase orders or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The City of Hanford accepts the bonding policy and requirements in compliance with Federal guidelines as set forth below:
(A) A Bid Guarantee from each bidder equivalent to 10% of the bid price. The Bid Guarantee must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the BIDDER will, upon acceptance of the BID, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.
(B) A Performance Bond on the part of the CONTRACTOR for 100% of the contract price. A Performance Bond is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor’s requirements under such contract.
(C) A Payment Bond on the part of the CONTRACTOR for 100% of the contract price. A Payment Bond is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.

5. BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA ACT (2 CFR 200.1 – IIJA; 49 U.S.C. 5323(J); 49 CFR 661) Contractor should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of this section:
(A) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (B) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non- ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.

6. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT (31 U.S.C. § 1352, as amended) Contractor certifies that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Contractor shall also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certification(s) to the awarding agency.

Page 352 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
39 7. CERTIFICATE OF NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES (FAR 52.222-23) (A) “Segregated facilities”, as used in this provision, means any waiting rooms, work areas, restrooms and washrooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees, that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin, because of habit, local custom, or otherwise. (B) By the submission of a bid, the Bidder certifies that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services a t any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The BIDDER agrees that a breach of this certification is a violation of the Equal Opportunity clause in the contract, agreement, or purchase order.
(C) By submission of the bid, the Bidder further agrees that (except where it has obtained identical certification from proposed SUBCONTRACTORS for specific time periods) it will:
i. Obtain identical certification from proposed SUBCONTRACTORS before the award of subcontracts under which the SUBBIDDER will be subject to the Equal Opportunity clause; ii. Retain such certifications in its files; and
iii. Forward this certification and the following notice to the proposed SUBCONTRACTORS:

NOTICE OF PROSPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTORS OF REQUIREMENT FOR

CERTIFICATION OF NON-SEGREGATED FACILITIES
A certificate of Nonsegregated Facilities must be submitted before the award of a subcontract under which the SUBCONTRACTOR will be subject to the Equal Opportunity clause. The certification may be submitted either for each SUBCONTRACTOR for all subcontrac ts during a period (i.e. quarterly, semi-annually, or annually).
(D) By commencing performance of the contract work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Nonsegregated Facilities provisions above.

8. CERTIFICATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS The BIDDER hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the federal requirements, regulations, policies, guidelines, and requirements with respect to the acceptance and use of Federal Funds for this federally assisted project.

9. CERIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING (31 CFR Part 21)
The BIDDER certifies, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:
(A) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

(B) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.

(C) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be include in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject

Page 353 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
40 to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The BIDDER certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition, the BIDDER understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Ch. 38, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and disclosure, if any.

10. CLEAN AIR ACT (42 U.S.C. 7401 -7671) & FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387; 49 CFR 18.36) (applies to purchases of more than$150,000) (A) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (B) The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (C) The Contractor agrees to report each violation of the Clean Air Act and the Water Pollution Control Act to the City of Hanford and understands and agrees that the City will report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.
(D) Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance.

11. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT (40 U.S.C. 327 through 333) (applies only to purchases over $100,000, when laborers or mechanics are used) Where applicable, all contracts in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers shall include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5). Under Section 3702 of the Act, each contractor shall be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard workweek of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard workweek is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than 1 1/2 times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the workweek. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction work and provides that no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence.

12. COPELAND “ANTI-KICKBACK” ACT (40 U.S.C. 3145)
CONTRACTOR must comply with the Copeland ‘‘Anti‐Kickback’’ Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, ‘‘Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States’’). Under the Copeland ‘‘Anti‐ Kickback’’ Act, the CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors are prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The CITY must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

13. DAVIS-BACON ACT, AS AMENDED (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148)
Applies to purchases for construction services in excess of $2,000. The Contractor must comply with the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141 -3144 and 3146 -3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations. In accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, the Contractor is required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate of not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the U.S. Secretary of Labor. In addition, the Contractor is required to pay wages not less than once per week. The City must provide Contractor

Page 354 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
41 with a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the U.S. Department of Labor with respect to the services to be provided under the subject Agreement. The Contractor’s execution of the subject Agreement constitutes the Contractor’s acceptance of the wage determination. The City must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal Awarding Agency.

14. DOMESTIC PREFERENCE STATEMENT (2 CFR 200.322)
As appropriate and to the extent consistent with the law, the BIDDER should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference to the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produce in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts, agreements, and purchase orders for work or products under this award.

15. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (2 CFR 180; 49 CFR 29, 18.35) (A) This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 CFR pt. 180 and 2 CFR pt. 3000. As such, the Contractor is required to verify that none of Contractor’s principals (defined at 2 CFR § 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 CFR § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 CFR § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 CFR § 180.935).
(B) The Contractor must comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (C) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the City of Hanford. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the C ity, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.
(D) The Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR pt. 180, subpart C and 2 CFR pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The Contractor further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.
(E) (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) — By execution of this Agreement, CONTRAC TOR certifies to the CITY that it is not a party listed on the government‐wide exclusions list in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), ‘‘Debarment and Suspension,’’ and is not debarred, suspended, or oth erwise excluded from the award of a federally‐supported contract un der statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549.

16. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The BIDDER certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug - free workplace. The BIDDER will:
(A) Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). (B) Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees of all the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
ii. The person’s or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, iii. Any available counselling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. (C) Provide as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed contract, agreement, grant, or purchase order:
i. Will receive a copy of the company’s drug-free workplace policy statement, and ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the company’s statement as a condition of employment on the

Page 355 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
42 contract, agreement, grant, or purchase order.
(D) At the elections of the BIDDER or CONTRACTOR, from and after the “Date Executed” and until __________ (NOT TO EXCEED 36 MONTHS), the government agency will regard this certificate as valid for all contracts, agreements, grants, or purchase orders entered into between the BIDDER and this government agency without requiring the BIDDER to provide a new and individual certificate for each contract, agreement, or purchase order. If the BIDDER elects to fill in the blank date, then the terms and conditions of thi s certificate were separately, specifically, and individually provided for each contract, agreement, or purchase order between the BIDDER and this government agency.

17. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)
Contractor shall comply with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by EO 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and as supplemented by regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.”

Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, if this Agreement meets the definition of ‘‘federally assisted construction contract’’ in 41 CFR Part 60–1.3, then during the performance of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR agrees as follows:

(A) The CONTRACTOR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, d emotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
(B) The CONTRACTOR will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on be‐ half of the CONTRACTOR, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (C) The CONTRACTOR will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the CONTRACTOR’S legal duty to furnish information.
(D) The CONTRACTOR will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the CONTRACTOR’S commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (E) The CONTRACTOR will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (F) The CONTRACTOR will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor

Page 356 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
43 for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (G) In the event of the CONTRACTOR’S noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the CONTRACTOR may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be im‐ posed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(H) The CONTRACTOR will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The CONTRACTOR will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the CITY may direct as a means of enforcing such pro‐ visions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event CONTRACTOR becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub‐contractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the CITY, then the CONTRACTOR may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. The CITY further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment prac tices when it participates in federally assisted construction work.
(I) The CITY agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant ord ers of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance. The CITY further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the CITY agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspen d in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the CITY under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the CITY; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

18. SEAT BELT USE IN THE UNITED STATES (EXECUTIVE ORDER 13043 & 62 CFR 19217) Contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt policies and programs for your employees when operating company-owned, rented or personally owned vehicles.

19. IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION (PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 2200 et seq.)
As required by California Public Contract Code Section 2204, the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR’S status in regard to the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 (Public Contract Code Section 2200 et seq) is true and correct:
___ (A) The BIDDER/CONTRACTOR is not:
i. Identified on the current list of persons and entities engaged in investment activities in Iran prepared

Page 357 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
44 by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203; or
ii. A financial institution that extends for 45 days or more, credit in the amount of $20,000,000 or more to any other person or entity identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) Public Contract Code Section 2203, if that person or entity uses or will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran. ___ (B) The City has exempted the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR from the requirements of the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 after making a public finding that, absent the exemption, the City will be unable to obtain the goods and/or services to be provided pursuant to the contract, agreement, or purchase order.
___ (C) The amount of the contract, agreement, or purchase order payable to the BIDDER/CONTRACTOR for the project does not exceed $1,000,000 over the life of the contract, agreement, or purchase order (up to 5 years).

Note: In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 2205, false certification of this form shall be reported to the California Attorney General and may result in civil penalties equal to the greater of $250,000 or twice the contract, agreement, or purchase order amount, termination of the contract, agreement, or purchase order amount, and/or eligibility to bid on contracts for three years.

20. MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (EXEC ORDERS 11625, 12138, and 12432) Contractor hereby agrees to comply with the following when applicable: The requirements of Executive Orders 11625 and 12432 (concerning Minority Business Enterprise), and 12138 (concerning Women's Business Enterprise). Accordingly, the Contractor hereby agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that women and minority businesses are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment, construction, and services. Affirmative steps shall include the following:

(A) Including qualified women’s business enterprises and small and minority businesses on solicitation lists. (B) Assuring that women’s enterprises and small and minority businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources.
(C) When economically feasible, dividing total requirements into smaller tasks or quantities so as to permit maximum participation by small and minority business, and women’s business enterprises. (D) Where the requirement permits, establishing delivery schedules which will encourage participation by women’s business enterprises and small and minority businesses. (E) Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration, and the U.S. Office of Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and (F) If any subcontracts are to be let, requiring the prime Contractor to take the affirmative steps in (A) - (E) above.

For the purposes of these requirements, a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) is defined as an enterprise that is at least 51 percent owned and controlled in its daily operation by members of the following groups: Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian, or Alaskan Natives. A Women Business Enterprise (WBE) is defined as an enterprise that is at least 51 percent owned and controlled in its daily operation by women.

21. NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (CALIFORNIA PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 7106) The BIDDER certifies, under the PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the below statement is true and correct:

That the BID is not made in the interest of, or on the behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the BID is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham BID, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham BID, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by

Page 358 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
45 agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER of any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract, agreement, or purchase order; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any break down thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham BID.

22. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal Government is not a party to this contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non-Federal entity, Contractor, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the contract.

23. PROCUREMENT OF RECOVERED MATERIALS (2 CFR 200.323)
(A) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired:
i. Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule. ii. Meeting contract performance requirements; or
iii. At a reasonable price.
(B) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site:
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. (C) Contractor agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 - Solid Waste Disposal Act.

24. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS & VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (Huawei and ZTE) (FAR 52.204-25) Contractor is prohibited from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to:
(A) Procure or obtain.
(B) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or (C) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115–232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (i) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (ii) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
(iii) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonabl y believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.

25. RECORDS RETENTION (2 CFR 200.334-337)
(A) Contractor must retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other of its records pertinent to this Agreement for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final

Page 359 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
46 expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or CITY. The only exceptions to the three-year limit are the following:

i. If any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the 3-year period, then the records must be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken.
ii. When the Contractor is notified in writing by the City or Federal awarding agency, cognizant agency for audit, oversight agency for audit, or cognizant agency for indirect costs to extend the retention period.
iii. Records for real property and equipment acquired with Federal funds must be retained for 3 years after final disposition.
iv. When records are transferred to or maintained by the City or Federal awarding agency, the 3 -year retention requirement is not applicable to the Contractor.

26. REDUCING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING (EXECUTIVE ORDER 13513-13513 FR 51225) Contractors are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving and establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers.

27. RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT (37 CFR 401) Contracts or agreements for the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work shall provide for the rights of the Federal Government and the recipient in any resulting invention in accordance with 37 CFR part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any applicable implementing regulations.

28. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE (CALIF LABOR CODE SECT 3700) The BIDDER acknowledges that they are aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work under this contract, agreement, or purchase order.

29. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS

Notice is hereby given that this is a Public Works Project and is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code, the City of Hanford has ascertained that the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the work being done is as per State of California, County of Kings wage scale that are current and online with the State of California Division of Industrial Relations (DIR) at: https://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Prevailing-Wage.html.

The Contractor to whom the contract is awarded shall pay not less than the specified wages to all workmen employed in the execution of the contract. Each Contractor awarded a contract must have an agent of the firm to sign documents required by the Califor nia Labor Code and to receive proper state forms for the reporting of certified payroll. Except as may be otherwise required by law, all claims and disputes pertaining to the classification of labor employed on the Project under the Contract Documents shal l be decided by the District’s Labor Compliance Officer.

Page 360 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
47 Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to supersede any applicable laws, orders or regulations issued by competent authority governing wages, hours of work of the employment of labor, nor to condone any violation of such laws, orders or regulations.

The Contractor shall post at appropriate conspicuous weatherproof points on the site of the Project a schedule showing the Prevailing Wage Determinations published by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations that are applicable to the Project.

Pursuant to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2 of the CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE at SECTION 1770, et seq ., the City has obtained from the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the prevailing rate for straight time, holiday time and overtime work in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the contract, a copy of which is available in the office of the City Engineer.

There shall be paid to each worker of the Contractor or any subcontractor, of any tier, engaged in the work not less than the general prevailing wage rate, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the Contractor or a ny subcontractor, of any tier, and such worker. The Contractor and subcontractors will be required to pay all workers on a weekly basis and to submit the certified payrolls to the Labor Compliance Office weekly.

Contractors shall maintain payrolls and basic records (e.g., timecards, canceled checks, cash receipts, trust fund forms, accounting ledgers, tax forms, etc.) during the course of the work and shall preserve them for a period of three (3) years for workers of all trades at the District’s project sites. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each worker, his or her classification, the rate of pay (including the rates of contributions for, or costs assumed to provide, frin ge benefits), daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made, and actual wages paid.

The prime Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the labor standards provisions are followed by its subcontractors and shall be responsible for the Labor Code violations of its subcontractors. The City, through its Labor Compliance Officer or it s designee, shall conduct periodic inspections/audits to determine whether the workers of all trades on project sites have been paid according to the prevailing wage rates.

The City, through its Labor Compliance Officer and its consultants, has the duty to enforce the Labor Code public works requirements (Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Divisions 2 and 3 of the CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE). It is the policy of the District to strictly enfor ce the public works prevailing wage requirements set for in the California Labor Code. To that end, Contractors and subcontractors that are found to be repeat violators of the Labor Code are subject to debarment from bidding on, or being awarded, any public works construction contract to the extent provided by law.

Within thirty days of approval, the City shall register the project with the Department of Industrial Relations of a Public Works Contract being awarded to the Contractor using the online electronic form PWC -100. The Contractor and all sub-contractors on the project shall provide their DIR registration numbers for verification of coverage and notification of the project. Contractors and subcontractors must submit certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner using the DIR’s electronic certified payroll reporting (eCPR) system.

Page 361 of 755 ends

RFQ 2025-02
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
48 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The official named below acknowledges that they are duly authorized legally to bind the Bidder/Contractor to the certifications previously listed. They acknowledge that they are fully aware that this certification, executed on the date below, is made under penalty of perjury under State of California and Federal laws.

______________________________________________________________________________

BIDDER/CONTRACTOR FIRM NAME

BIDDER/CONTRACTOR FIRM MAILING ADDRESS:

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________ FEDERAL ID NUMBER:

______________________________________________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBER & EMAIL ADDRESS

BY:

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

PRINTED NAME & TITLE

____________________________

DATE EXECUTED

DESIGNLAB 252
PO Box 27616 Fresno, CA 93729
26-1974700
559-4723-9966 x101 | [email protected]
Scott Mears, President
09-09-202

Page 362 of 755 ends

□ □ □
□ □
□ □ --
-
B
----
□ □
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q D ISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post -award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in -kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ________________________________ ________
Print Name: ________________________________ _______
Title: ________________________________ ____________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date:___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013

NO LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

Page 363 of 755 ends

EXHIBIT 10-A

A&E CONSULTANT FINANCIAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUEST
Caltrans Division of Local Assistance
(Completed by Local Agencies, One per Contract)
(For New Proposed A&E Consultant Local Agency Contracts of $150,000 or Greater) (For Amendments, use only when there are additional subconsultants or changes in ICR) EMAIL TO:

California State Department of Transportation
Independent Office of Audits and Investigations
conformance [email protected] .gov
Date:

Federal Project Number : _______ _
Attention: Audit Manager, External Contracts-Local Agencies The following applicable documents are attached for proposed A&E Consultant Contract No. _______ at a proposed Contract or Amended amount of$ ______ ~ with ______________ _ (Prime Consultant's full legal name)
The Project Description is (Identify if an Amendment or a New Contract): ____________ _ Participation Amounts for Prime and all Sub-consultants on this contract are:

Consultant's Name
Participation
Amount
Category 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
or N/A (see below)
Caltrans ICR Acceptance
ID# (if available)
Note : Add pages if necessary. NI A applies to Consultants with participation amount less than $150,000 I verify that we have received from the prime & sub-consultants on this contract and are forwarding to A&I, the financial documents that meet A&I's minimum requirements for contracts~ $150,000* (as listed below) as well as the financial documents required under each Consultant's Category Requirements as specified in the Exhibit 10-A Checklist:

Minimum Requirements
1) A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Letter (Exhibit 10-A) - Completed for each contract, by Local Agency
2) Cost Proposals (Examples at Exhibit 10-Hl through 10-H4)-Completed by Consultants 3) Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Exhibit 10-K) - Completed by each Consultant (Except for firms requesting the Safe Harbor Rate) 4) Points of contact for Local Agency and Prime Consultant Name ______________ _ Signature _________________ _
Title _____________ _
Name of Local Agency and Department _________________________ _ Address __________________________________ _
*Consultants with multi-year Contracts that begin at $150,000 or more, with Indirect Cost Rates (ICR) that change every year are required to follow the same minimum and category requirements for each fiscal year ICR proposed.

April 2018
Designalab 252 will submit on Notice of Selection rather than with the initial SOQ submission

Page 364 of 755 ends

Loc11I Aiisl ~t1111ce Procedur es M11 nu11l E~hibit to-A Chccklbt

CAL TRANS A&I FINANCIAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) CONSULTANTS

ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY CONTRACTS
All Prime & Sub-consultants must submit the following minimum requirements for contracts:::: $150,000:
1) A&E Consultant Financial Document Review Request Letter (Exhibit I 0-A) - Completed by Local Agency for each contract ( /) 2) Cost Proposals (Examples at Exhibit JO-HI through I0-H4) - Completed by Consultants 3) Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Exhibit l0-K) - Completed by each Consultant (except for firms requesting Safe Harbor Rate)
4) Local Agency and Prime Consultant's Points of Contact If not Categories 1-3
CATEGORY 1: CATEGORY 2: CATEGORY 3: CATEGORY 4: CATEGORYS:

Firms with Firms with Firms Requesting Contracts~ Contracts ~ SIM Cognizant Caltrans Safe Barbor Rate $1S0K to< SIM and participating Type of Financial Documents and Information Approval Letter Acceptance ID (SOR) and participating amounts ~ $1SOK for ICR FYE proposed * forlCRFYE Number for ICR amounts~ to proposed FYE proposed ** $!SOK
For all Prime and Sub-consultants
Cognizant Approval Letter for the FYE proposed (issued by cognizant state, which is based on location of Accounting Records as stated in AASHTO ✓ JCQ)
Caltrans' !CR Acceptance ID #s for !CR FYE proposed •• ✓ FAR Compliant Indirect Cost Rate (!CR) Schedule including FAR References and Disclosure Notes (2)
;tPrime Co11sultant must have a CPA Audited !CR Report if contract is ~ ✓ ✓ $ , regardless of Prime Consultant's participation amount.(2) -+- Prior Year !CR Schedule ✓
AASHTO Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) Appendix B (3) ✓ ✓ Post Closing Trial Balance (4) ✓
Vacation/Sick Policy ✓
Bonus Policy ✓
Executive Compensation Analysis (ECA) (4) ✓
Prevailing Wage (PW) Policy for PW contracts (5) ✓ ✓ ✓ *** ✓ ✓ When applicable, additional documents may be requested:

Supplemental reconciliation schedule (to tie the proposed !CR Schedule to Trial Balance) (4)
Chart of Accounts
Income Statement (4)
Labor Summary Report (6)
Related Party Rent Analysis ( 4)
Vehicle, Equipment, and Other Direct Costs Schedules (4) Safe Harbor Rate Documents:

Consultant Certification of Eligibility of Contract Costs and Financial Management System (Attachment IR) ✓
Additional Documents Required 2 2 2 3 8
April 20 18

Page 365 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System EXHIBIT 10-KCONSULTANT ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF

INDIRECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required.) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:

Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.

Indirect Cost Rate:

Combined Rate % OR
Home Office Rate % and Field Office Rate (if applicable) % Facilities Capital Cost of Money % (if applicable)
Fiscal period *
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the Indirect Cost Rate was developed (not the contract period). The Indirect Cost Rate is based on the consultant’s one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.

I have reviewed the proposal to establish an Indirect Cost Rate(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the indirect cost rate(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31); • The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31;
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally- funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant’s ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.

I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on Exhibit 10-A.

Financial Management System:

Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.

Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost

Page 1 of 2 ends

March 2018

Page 366 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System accounts;
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • Internal controls to maintain integrity of financial management system; • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirement Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:

I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount $___________________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & Engineering services that the consultant received in the last three fiscal periods. • The number of states in which the consultant does business is . • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is . • Audit history of the consultant’s current and prior years (if applicable) ☐ Cognizant ICR Audit ☐ Local Gov’t ICR Audit □ Caltrans ICR Audit ☐ Federal Gov’t ICR Audit ☐ CPA ICR Audit
I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the Indirect Cost Rate Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.

Name**: _ Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number**:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President, a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information used to establish the indirect cost rate.

Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own Exhibit 10-K forms.

Caltrans will not process local agency’s invoices until a complete Exhibit 10-K form is accepted and approved by Caltrans Audits and Investigations.

Distribution: 1) Original - Local Agency Project File
2) Copy - Consultant
3) Copy - Caltrans Audits and Investigations

Page 2 of 2 ends

March 2018

Page 367 of 755 ends

Internal Control Questionnaire for Consulting Engineers ( Versi on: 2016- 01 ) AASHTO Uniform Auditing & Accounting Guide (2015 Edition) – APPENDIX B Page B-1 Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) for Consulting Engineers

Name of Engineering Consultant (“the Company”):

TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number):

Headquarters Address:

Company Website:

Fiscal Year End:

This ICQ was prepared for (DOT/agency name):

Time Period Covered:

Location of Accounting Records:
- Please include the following items as attachments to this ICQ:
 FAR Part 31 Overhead Audit Report for most recent fiscal year, including audited Statement of Direct Labor, Fringe Benefits, and General Overhead (hereinafter “Indirect Cost Rate Schedule”) and related reconciliation to the financial statements.
 Cognizant audit report or cognizant letter of concurrence from the cognizant Government agency.

Check here if not applicable:
 Post-closing trial balance and financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows) for the most recent fiscal year. (Note: If the indirect cost rate schedule does not directly tie to the trial balance, then please provide a supplemental reconciliation schedule.)  Current chart of accounts that ties to financial statements and indirect cost rate schedule.  Independent Auditor’s Report on financial statements and accompanying management letter.

Check here if not applicable:
 Sample timesheet.
 The Company’s policies for vacation and sick leave.
 The Company’s bonus policy.
 Other written policies, as requested throughout this ICQ.

Note: Throughout this ICQ, all references to “AASHTO Guide” pertain to the 2015 Edition of the AASHTO Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide.
- Please identify the Company’s primary contact for accounting questions:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Mailing address (if different than headquarters address listed above):

A. Background Information
A.1. Year Established. When was the Company formed?
A.2. Business Form. What form of business entity is the Company? Sole Proprietorship Partnership C Corporation S Corporation Other
Designlab 252 will submit on Notice of Selection rather than with the initial SOQ submission

Page 368 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-U
Consultant Management Conflict of Interest Statement

Page 1 of 3 ends

LPP 17-01 January 2018
EXHIBIT 10-U CONSULTANT IN MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ROLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT1

RFP/RFQ PROCUREMENT NUMBERS (if applicable):

PROJECT NAME (and FPN, if applicable)2:

APPLICABILITY: To be filled out by local agency consultants in management support role. □ I am an employee of a consultant under contract to the local agency that is responsible for the procuring and administering of one or more consultant contracts containing either Federal or State funds.
□ I am in a management position with the local agency, my title is listed below and I have attached my duty statement and scope of work.
□ I hereby certify as follows:

1. I recuse myself from all potential conflicts of interest.

2. I will not directly or indirectly participate in, manage, or oversee any consultant selection procurement process in which the consulting firm of which I am employed is competing as a consultant or subconsultant.

3. I will not directly or indirectly influence any employee, staff member, or other individual participating in any consultant selection procurement process in which the consulting firm of which I am employed is as a consultant or subconsultant.

4. I will not directly or indirectly participate in, manage, or oversee any local agency contract that is with the consulting firm of which I am employed, regardless of whether the involvement of my employer in the contract is as a consultant or subconsultant.

Among other things, this includes my not being involved in approving changes in the schedule, scope, deliverables or invoices.

5. I understand that if I am involved in any local agency contract that is with the consulting firm of which I am employed, in violation of 1. or 2. above, that local agency contract will no longer be eligible for Federal or State reimbursement because of my involvement.
□ I certify that I have read and understand my responsibilities per 23 CFR 172.7(b)(5) □ I fully understand that it is unlawful for a person to utilize any organization name (i.e. local agency) or auxiliary organization information, which is not a matter of public record, for personal gain.
1 Each consultant staff working in a management support role shall complete a separate form. 2 For on-call contracts or contracts for multiple projects, indicate accordingly.

Designlab 252 is not working in a managment support role so does not have a conflict.

Page 369 of 755 ends

APPENDIX

Page 370 of 755 ends

TRC AND

SUBCONSULTANT

KEY STAFF

RESUMES

Page 371 of 755 ends

MARK A. IMBRIANI, PE CONTRACT MANAGER / FUNDING ASSISTANCE / QA & QC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 44 YEARS WITH TRC: 25
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, Case Institute of Technology, 1980 A.T.P. Program Training, Caltrans District 5; LAPM Week-long Training, Caltrans District 5; LAPM Chapter 10, Consultant Selection Training, Caltrans D5; Transportation Funding, Caltrans LTAP, Woodland, CA PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

Professional Engineer, California, (#36634), 1983

Mr. Imbriani is an expert in management, planning studies, grant application writing and engineering, value engineering, design, plans, specifications and construction estimates, scheduling, and construction management of bridge, railroad, bicycle, pedestrian and highway projects, with particular expertise in the application of FHWA, AREMA, AASHTO, and Caltrans design and construction policies and procedures. He serves as TRC’s state-wide project funding coordinator, which includes assisting clients in obtaining and maintaining eligibility for funding from numerous local, state and federal programs. Mr. Imbriani has prepared successful funding nominations for many projects. Funding sources include federal HBP and EDA; State ATP, SH190 Grade Separation, and Proposition 1B HRCSA, CMIA, and LBSRA; and local sales tax measure funding. He also prepares Local Assistance Procedures Manual funding paperwork required by the CTC and Caltrans to maintain clients’ eligibility to retain the funding they secure. He has been the lead in a design group that successfully prepared PSR’s, PR’s, and PS&E for dozens of local agency clients, state DOTs, light rail properties, and Class 1 Railroads, including freeways, highways, arterial roadways, bicycle/pedestrian multi-use trails, and local street and road projects.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects were completed while employed with TRC.

City of Hanford, 13th Avenue at Grangeville Boulevard - Hanford, CA Mr. Imbriani served as Project Manager for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates to widen and signalize the intersection and pipe a segment of an irrigation canal. Additional tasks included coordination with the Last Chance Ditch company and utility coordination. This project was funded with CMAQ funding.

City of Hanford, Grangeville Boulevard / BNSF Grade Separation Study - Hanford, CA Mr. Imbriani served as Project Manager for the preparation of a Feasibility Report for a grade separation structure between the BNSF railroad and Grangeville Boulevard. It was recommended that an underpass configuration would be the preferred alternative. A nomination package was prepared for SH190 funding.

City of Hanford, Grade Separation Fund Grant Applications - Hanford, CA Mr. Imbriani serves as Project Manager for the preparation of a study identifying the optimal location for this project. TRC studied four different grade crossings for feasibility and the benefits of a grade separation, and the decision was made to focus on the Grangeville Boulevard crossing. He prepared a successful Nomination (Grant Application) for the Grangeville Blvd. location that resulted in the project being placed on the CPUC’s SH190 Grade Separation Fund Priority List. This means that the City is eligible for a $5 Million award from that fund for this project. TRC also prepared technical input to a Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Grant Application in 2022 and is currently performing the same role for a grant in 2024.

Page 372 of 755 ends

MARK A. IMBRIANI, PE
TRCcompanies.com
San Benito County, On-Call Engineering Services - Roadway Rehabilitation Improvement Projects - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Imbriani serves as TRC’s Principal-In-Charge for the design and preparation of full PS&E for roadway design, including pavement design, structure design, and drainage design on segments of ten road rehabilitation projects. The PS&E was produced on an expedited schedule in order to use the allocated funds for the projects.

TRC is currently providing construction support services.

City of Visalia, State Route 198 / Akers Street Interchange Improvements and Roadway Widening – Visalia, CA Mr. Imbriani served as Principal-In-Charge for the preliminary engineering work and PS&E services for the widening of Akers Street to include left turn lanes at the SR 198 interchange. The project included modifications at the SR 198 interchange and local road modifications. The TRC team provided traffic studies, surveys, right of way engineering, utility coordination, local and state agency coordination, roadway design, structure design, drainage design, traffic signal design, pavement delineation, and landscape design. Final PS&E was submitted, and the project constructed. TRC provided construction support services. Project awards won include ASCE Fresno Branch Roadway / Highway Project of the Year award.

City of Visalia, State Route 198 / Plaza Drive Interchange Upgrade and Roadway Widening - Visalia, CA Mr. Imbriani served as Project Manager for the widening of the existing overcrossing, interchange ramp widening with retaining walls and terminus signalization for two off-ramps, and the widening of Plaza Drive. The PR and PS&E for this project included traffic studies, drainage studies, surveys, right of way engineering, landscape design along with roadway engineering for widening of this two-lane roadway to a four lane with landscape median and left-turn lanes. The entire corridor was improved with current ADA standards. Mr.

Imbriani assisted the City in obtaining an EDA Grant in the amount of $4 million dollars for road improvements within the City’s R/W and $7.8 million in Prop. 1B CMIA funds. TRC also prepared the Funding Allocation Request Package that was approved by the CTC. Project awards won include ASCE Project of the Year; APWA Project of the Year; and the TCAG Outstanding Economic Development Project.

Monterey County, Davis Road Multimodal Widening and Bridge Replacement - Salinas, CA Mr. Imbriani serves as Project Manager for widening 2.2 miles of arterial roadway from two lanes to four lanes of traffic, including a new 1700-foot-long bridge over the Salinas River. A combined Project Study Report/Project Report was completed, and PS&E includes bridge design, roadway widening, pavement analysis, preparing a roadway drainage report, preparing a storm water data report, drainage design, utility coordination, right of way coordination, access road constructions for adjacent farmers, pavement delineation, and stage construction.

Design is complete and the County is obtaining right of way and the TRC team is securing final environmental permits. Utilities are being relocated now with construction to begin in Summer 2024.

City of San Luis Obispo, Railroad Safety Multi-Use Trail and Grade Separation, Taft to Pepper - San Luis Obispo, CA
Mr. Imbriani served as Project Manager for preliminary and final design for the Taft to Phillips extension, which included a bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) track, six truss spans parallel to the tracks, and an 1,100’ pathway extension. The alignment connects to an existing Class I path at Taft and takes advantage of the existing California Overcrossing of US 101 to avoid having to construct a new structure there. The project also included a widening of the US 101 Northbound offramp. A Caltrans Encroachment permit was secured for this work. TRC assisted the City in obtaining $3.24 million of ATP funding for this project. TRC also provided extensive support during construction. The project was constructed and opened to the public in March 2022.

Project awards won include ASCE Fresno Branch, Los Angeles Section and Regionals Bikeways and Trails Project of the Year.

Page 373 of 755 ends

JUSTINA L. CONKLIN, PE CIVIL / ROADWAY PROJECT MANAGER
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 33 YEARS WITH TRC: 16
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, 1991 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

Professional Engineer, California, (#53183), 1995

Ms. Conklin has broad civil engineering experience in the planning, design, and construction of transportation related projects. She has direct responsibility for the preparation and coordination of the project and deliverables, which include environmental studies, preliminary and final design, technical specifications, cost estimation, permitting, and agency coordination, and construction contract administration. Ms. Conklin is very knowledgeable of both the local agency and Caltrans project development processes and has successfully delivered projects with all types of funding, meeting stringent funding deadlines. She also prepares Local Assistance Procedures Manual funding paperwork required by the CTC and Caltrans to maintain clients’ eligibility to retain the funding they secure. Before joining the consulting design industry, Ms. Conklin was an Associate Engineer with Sacramento County where she managed all stages of design including project scoping for funding allocations, environmental studies, PS&E, and utility coordination.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects were completed while employed with TRC.

City of Hanford, 13th Avenue at Grangeville Boulevard - Hanford, CA Ms. Conklin served as Project Engineer for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates to widen and signalize the intersection and pipe a segment of an irrigation canal. Additional tasks included coordination with the Last Chance Ditch company and utility coordination. This project was funded with CMAQ funding.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Measure G- Shore Road Rehabilitation from Frazier Lake Road to San Felipe Road (FY24-25) - San Benito County, CA
Ms. Conklin serves as Project Manager for the preparation of PS&E documents for road maintenance rehabilitation improvements for the 2.6-mile roadway segment which included utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design totaling $4.6M. The maintenance repair was funded using Measure G funds. The design for this project included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and overlay. Construction for Shore Road is expected to begin in the Fall 2024. TRC will also provide construction support services to address submittals and Contractor RFI’s.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Project Cole Road (Ricardo to Anzar) and Cienega Road (Mudstone Ranch to Bird Creek) (FY 24-25) - San Benito County, CA Ms. Conklin serves as Project Manager for the preparation of full PS&E documents for road maintenance on Cole Road and Cienega Road totaling $3.5M. TRC is preparing the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design. The maintenance repair was funded using SB-1 funds. The designs for these projects included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and overlay and soldier pile wall design for the slip out areas. Construction for Cole Road is expected to begin in the Fall 2024 and construction of Cienega Road is expected in the Spring 2025. TRC will also provide construction support services to address submittals and Contractor RFI’s.

Page 374 of 755 ends

JUSTINA L. CONKLIN, PE
TRCcompanies.com
San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Road Maintenance Projects at Various Locations (FY 20-21) - San Benito County, CA
Ms. Conklin served as Project Manager for the design of full PS&E documents for various road maintenance projects totaling $3.6M. In addition, the team provided construction management services to the County during construction. The Project encompassed the completion of roadway maintenance repairs on segments of Cienega Road, Anzar Road, and Carr Avenue. TRC prepared the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design. The maintenance repair was funded using SB-1 funds. The designs for these projects included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and overlay and cape seal and overlay.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Road Maintenance Projects at Various Locations (FY 19-20) - San Benito County, CA
Ms. Conklin served as Project Manager for the design and full PS&E documents for various road maintenance projects totaling $2.1M. The Project encompassed the completion of roadway maintenance repairs on segments of Fairview Road, Union Road, Cienega Road, Southside Road, Crestview Road, and Hillcrest Road. TRC prepared the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design. The maintenance repair was funded using SB-1 funds. The designs for these projects included Cold In- Place Recycling (CIR), Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR), cape seal and overlay. TRC also provided construction support services.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Southside Road 5000 Block Slip Out and Road Maintenance Repairs (FY 19-20) - San Benito County, CA
Ms. Conklin served as Project Manager for the design and full PS&E documents for road maintenance improvements and road slip-out repairs totaling $2.1M. The Project encompassed the completion of roadway maintenance repairs on Southside Road including the construction of two soldier pile retaining walls. The maintenance repair was funded using Measure G funds. The designs for these projects included an asphalt overlay and full structural section replacement. In addition, the team provided construction management services to the County during construction.

Monterey County, On-Call Services, Four Road Rehabilitations (Harkins Road, Hunter Lane, Hitchcock Road & Foster Road) - Monterey County, CA
Ms. Conklin serves as Project Manager for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including structural design, grading design, construction details design, drainage design, cost estimating and preparation of technical specifications.

City of Visalia, SR 198 / Akers Street Improvements and Widening - Visalia, CA Ms. Conklin served as Project Manager for the preliminary engineering work and final PS&E for the widening of Akers Street to include left turn lanes at the SR 198 interchange. The project also included ramp modifications at the SR 198 interchange and local road modifications. This project consisted of traffic studies, surveys, right of way engineering, utility coordination, local and state agency coordination, roadway design, structure design, drainage design, traffic signal design, pavement delineation, and landscape design. The project was constructed, and bidding and construction support was provided. Project awards won include ASCE Fresno Chapter Roadway / Highway Project of the Year and APWA Central California Chapter Public Works Project of the Year – Transportation Honorable Mention.

Page 375 of 755 ends

MARK J. CHRISTENSEN, PE PROJECT MANAGER
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 39 YEARS WITH TRC: 20
EDUCATION: MBA, Engineering and Science Management, University of California, Davis, 1987; B.S., Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1985 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

Professional Engineer, California, (#45569), 1990

Mr. Christensen has experience and progressive responsibility in civil engineering with a broad-based background covering bridges and roads, bridge rehabilitation, pipeline design, drainage, hydrology studies and hydraulic modeling of channels and watersheds. His responsibilities include project management, design and analysis for projects in each of these areas as well as preparation of studies, reports, preliminary and final plans, specifications, cost estimates, technical reviews and quality control reviews. Mr. Christensen served as a Project Manager for final PS&E of the $5.5M Third Street Bridge project in San Francisco, the construction phase of the Oakland-San Francisco Bay Bridge Temporary Bypass Structure and for the Elm Grove Interchange Bridges on I- 70 in West Virginia.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects were completed while employed with TRC.

San Benito County, On-Call Roadway Rehabilitation Improvements - San Benito County, CA Mr. Christensen served as QA/QC Manager for the design and preparation of full PS&E for roadway design, including pavement design, structure design, and drainage design. Mr. Christensen performed detailed review of the plans, and a coordination review of the specifications and estimate with bid items on the plans for the Measure G-Southside Road 5000 Block Maintenance project. The PS&E was produced on an expedited schedule in order to use the allocated funds for the projects.

San Benito County, New Idria Bridge Replacement, San Benito County, CA Mr. Christensen serves as Project Manager for the design, preparation, and oversight of full PS&E documents for roadway design including utility coordination, geometric design, structural section, grading, and drainage design.

The project consists of repairing the washout on New Idria Road at Los Pinos Creek. The washout occurred during a major rainfall event that transpired January 27-28, 2021. Based on nearby gauge data from Weather Underground, the rainfall accumulation over a 24-hour period exceeded 10 inches. Evidence at the site indicates that the road was overtopped by floodwater prior to the failure of the culvert.

Tulare County, Avenue 428 Sand Creek Bridge Replacement – Orosi, CA Mr. Christensen serves as Project Manager for the replacement of this three-span flat slab bridge with a new 75 ft. long, single-span cast-in-place, prestressed voided slab bridge. Life cycle cost analysis and justification report were prepared to justify replacement of the bridge to Caltrans. Environmental assistance was also provided for this project. TRC is working with Tulare County staff who are responsible for roadway design. TRC has completed 95% design for the project.

San Francisco Public Works, Third Street Bridge Rehabilitation- San Francisco, CA Mr. Christensen served as Project Manager for design, environmental documentation and construction support services for this project. The historic Third Street Bridge over Mission Channel is a single leaf, heel trunnion type bascule span bridge. Mr. Christensen led a team of structural, bridge and environmental engineers to inspect and assess the condition of the bridge and then prepared rehabilitation plans, allowing the City to bid the

Page 376 of 755 ends

MARK J. CHRISTENSEN, PE
TRCcompanies.com
project. Construction support was provided for this $5.5M bridge project. Project awards won include: Silver Level Award for Infrastructure more than $20M and an ASCE Fresno Branch Historical Renovation Project of the Year.

City of Visalia, SR 198 / Akers Street Interchange Improvements and Roadway Widening - Visalia, CA Mr. Christensen served as Design Engineer for the preliminary engineering and final PS&E for the widening of Akers Street to include left turn lanes at the SR 198 interchange. The project included ramp modifications at the SR 198 interchange and local road modifications. This project involved traffic studies, surveys, right of way engineering, utility coordination, local and state agency coordination, roadway design, structure design, drainage design, traffic signal design, pavement delineation, and landscape design. The project has been constructed and TRC provided construction support. Project awards won include ASCE Fresno Chapter Roadway / Highway Project of the Year and APWA Central California Chapter Public Works Project of the Year – Transportation Honorable Mention.

Sonoma County, FEMA 2019 Geysers Road Storm Sites Repair Design - Sonoma County, CA During the 2019 February winter storms, Geysers Road suffered multiple slipouts and needs engineering design to repair the roadway on multiple sites. Mr. Christensen provided overall Quality Control and Specifications preparation of PS&E design.

Monterey County, Davis Road Multimodal Widening and Bridge Replacement - Salinas, CA Mr. Christensen served as Project Engineer for the widening of 2.2 miles of arterial roadway from two lanes to four lanes of traffic, including a new 1700-foot-long bridge over the Salinas River. Mr. Christensen prepared the drainage report, storm water data report, specifications and reviewed the final PS&E design plans for accuracy. All work is to Caltrans’ standards as State and Federal funding is being used for the project. Design is complete and the County is obtaining right of way and the TRC team is securing final environmental permits. Utilities are being relocated now with construction to begin in Fall 2024.

Sonoma County, Big Sulphur Creek Bridge at Geysers Road Replacement - Cloverdale, CA Mr. Christensen serves as Project Engineer for overall Quality Control and Specifications preparation of PS&E design services for the replacement of this historical steel truss one lane bridge. It will be replaced with a two- lane bridge which will be designed and constructed downstream from the existing. TRC’s role includes project management, preliminary and final design, preparation of PS&E, certain NEPA / CEQA studies, obtaining permits, roadway approach design, structure design, traffic design, and construction bid phase services.

Fresno County, Fresno Canal Bridge Replacement at McKinley Avenue - Sanger, CA Mr. Christensen served as Design Engineer for the replacement of this two-span, structurally deficient, timber stringer bridge. The new bridge is a clear span precast / prestressed voided slab bridge with composite concrete topping slab, and is approximately 10’ longer than the existing bridge to improve channel hydraulics and alleviate scour. Final construction documents were submitted and the project constructed. TRC provided construction support. Project awards won include: ASCE San Francisco Section Outstanding Structural Engineering Project of the Year and an ASCE Fresno Chapter Roadway/Highway Project of the Year.

Sonoma County Department of Transportation and Public Works, On-Call Engineering-Geysers Road Emergency Repairs (Task Order #3) - Sonoma County, CA
During the 2017 February winter storms, Geysers Road suffered multiple slipouts and needed engineering design to repair the roadway on three sites. TO #3A is 160 feet long, TO #3B is 180 feet long, and TO #3C consists of a slipout and a failed retaining wall. Mr. Christensen performed the final QA/QC review which included detailed review of plans, and a coordination review of the specifications and estimate with bid items on the plans.

Page 377 of 755 ends

AARON S. BEDAL, PE CIVIL / ROADWAY SENIOR ENGINEER
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 11 YEARS WITH TRC: 11
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, 2013 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

Professional Engineer, California, (#86668), 2016

Mr. Bedal is an experienced Senior Roadway Engineer responsible for the preparation of plans from conceptual design through completion. In preparing PS&E projects, Mr. Bedal is responsible for establishing the design parameters for a project that meets current agency standards, leading a design team to prepare conceptual design plans and estimates and complete the PS&E documents to bid. He is skilled at using AutoCAD Civil 3D for design and plan production and specializes in design of roadways, pathways, site layout, utility layout, grading, drainage design, and roadway rehabilitation design. Mr. Bedal has vast experience using the AASHTO's design standards and various jurisdictional design standards for many local agencies and is very familiar with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Standards, and Specifications, as well as the CA MUTCD.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects while employed with TRC.

City of Hanford, 13th Avenue at Grangeville Boulevard - Hanford, CA Mr. Bedal served as Design Engineer for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates to widen and signalize the intersection and pipe a segment of an irrigation canal. Additional tasks included coordination with the Last Chance Ditch company and utility coordination. This project was funded with CMAQ funding.

City of Hanford, Grangeville Boulevard / BNSF Grade Separation Study - Hanford, CA Mr. Bedal served as Design Engineer for the preparation of a Feasibility Report for a grade separation structure between the BNSF railroad and Grangeville Boulevard. It was recommended that an underpass configuration would be the preferred alternative. A nomination package was prepared for SH190 funding.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Measure G- Shore Road Rehabilitation from Frazier Lake Road to San Felipe Road (FY24-25) - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Bedal serves as Project Engineer for the preparation of PS&E documents for road maintenance rehabilitation improvements for the 2.6-mile roadway segment which included utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design totaling $4.6M. The maintenance repair was funded using Measure G funds. The design for this project included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and overlay. Construction for Shore Road is expected to begin in the Fall 2024. TRC will also provide construction support services to address submittals and Contractor RFI’s.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Project Cole Road (Ricardo to Anzar) and Cienega Road (Mudstone Ranch to Bird Creek) (FY 24-25) - San Benito County, CA Mr. Bedal serves as Project Engineer for the preparation of full PS&E documents for road maintenance on Cole Road and Cienega Road totaling $3.5M. TRC is preparing the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design. The maintenance repair was funded using SB-1 funds. The designs for these projects included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and overlay and soldier pile wall design for the slip out areas. Construction for Cole Road is expected to begin in the Fall 2024 and construction of Cienega Road is expected in the Spring 2025. TRC will also provide construction support services to address submittals and Contractor RFI’s.

Page 378 of 755 ends

AARON S. BEDAL, PE
TRCcompanies.com
San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Road Maintenance Projects at Various Locations (FY 20-21) - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Bedal served as Project Engineer for the design of full PS&E documents for various road maintenance projects totaling $3.6M. In addition, the team provided construction management services to the County during construction. The Project encompassed the completion of roadway maintenance repairs on segments of Cienega Road, Anzar Road, and Carr Avenue. TRC prepared the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design. The maintenance repair was funded using SB-1 funds. The designs for these projects included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and overlay and cape seal and overlay.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Enterprise Road Maintenance Projects at Best Road and Fairview Road (FY 19-20) - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Bedal served as Project Engineer for the design and full PS&E documents for various road maintenance projects totaling $2.9M. In addition, the team provided construction management services to the County during construction. TRC prepared the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design. The maintenance repair was funded using Enterprise funds. The designs for these projects included Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and a Geogrid embankment solution with a new structural section.

Also, along Fairview Road, the existing drainage ditches were cleared and graded to drain and new culverts under driveways were installed to assist with drainage along the roadway.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Road Maintenance Projects at Various Locations (FY 19-20) - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Bedal served as Project Engineer for the design and full PS&E documents for various road maintenance projects totaling $2.1M. The Project encompassed the completion of roadway maintenance repairs on segments of Fairview Road, Union Road, Cienega Road, Southside Road, Crestview Road, and Hillcrest Road. TRC prepared the PS&E for the necessary roadway design including utility coordination, pavement design, and drainage design.

The maintenance repair was funded using SB-1 funds. The designs for these projects included Cold In-Place Recycling (CIR), Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR), cape seal and overlay. TRC also provided construction support services.

Monterey County, On-Call Services, Four Road Rehabilitations (Harkins Road, Hunter Lane, Hitchcock Road & Foster Road) - Monterey County, CA
Mr. Bedal served as Project Engineer for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including structural design, grading design, construction details design, drainage design, cost estimating and preparation of technical specifications.

City of Visalia, SR 198 / Akers Street Interchange Improvements and Roadway Widening - Visalia, CA Mr. Bedal served as Senior Design Engineer for the preliminary engineering and PS&E services for the widening of Akers Street to include left turn lanes at the SR 198 interchange. The project included ramp modifications at the SR 198 interchange and local road modifications. This project consisted of traffic studies, surveys, right of way engineering, utility coordination, local and state agency coordination, roadway design, structure design, drainage design, traffic signal design, pavement delineation, and landscape design. The project was constructed, and bidding and construction support was provided. Project awards won include: ASCE Fresno Chapter Roadway/ Highway Project of the Year and APWA Central California Chapter Project of the Year – Transportation Honorable Mention.

Page 379 of 755 ends

CARLOS SILVA CIVIL / ROADWAY SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 30 YEARS WITH TRC: 3
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, 1993 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

None

Mr. Silva has years of experience in roadway and highway design including over 10 years of construction inspection/management experience and 10 years supervising and training staff. He is heavily involved with design and assists with Project Study Reports (PSR), Project Reports (PR), Plans, Specs and Estimates (PS&E), and corridor studies for roadway, interchange, and bridge projects. Mr. Silva provides project management assistance, QA/QC on projects, communication/coordination with clients, local agencies, utility companies, sub- consultants and contractors. Additional experience includes CAD for design and plans preparation, roadway drainage, assisting with design exceptions, roundabout concept approval reports, proposals, traffic management plans (TMP), review of environmental studies for project consistency, preparation of response to comments and amendments to bidding documents, assists clients with Caltrans Local Assistance procedures and standards, and implements Caltrans, AASHTO, MUTCD, FHWA and ADA and local agency standards. Mr. Silva also has experience with addressing CCO’s & RFI’s, assisting with public outreach, coordinating/attending project development team (PDT), agency and utility coordination meetings.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects were completed while employed with TRC.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Project Cole Road (Ricardo to Anzar) and Cienega Road (Mudstone Ranch to Bird Creek) (FY 24-25) - San Benito County, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including pavement design, grading design, drainage design, signing and striping design, cost estimating, preparation of technical specifications and utility coordination on this rehabilitation project. The PS&E is being produced on an expedited schedule in order to use the allocated funds for the projects.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Measure G- Shore Road Rehabilitation from Frazier Lake Road to San Felipe Road (FY24-25) - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including pavement design and drainage design on this rehabilitation project. The PS&E is being produced on an expedited schedule to use the allocated funds for the projects.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, SB-1 Road Maintenance Projects at Various Locations (FY 19-20) - San Benito County, CA
Mr. Silva served as Project Engineer for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for the replacement of the storm drain culvert under Union Road. The PS&E design included utility coordination, drainage calculations, contour grading, drainage profiles and details, cost estimating, and preparation of special provisions for construction.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Cole Road Rehabilitation Improvement Project - San Benito County, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including pavement design, grading design, retaining wall modeling, drainage design, signing

Page 380 of 755 ends

CARLOS SILVA
TRCcompanies.com
and striping design, cost estimating, preparation of technical specifications and utility coordination.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Traffic Striping at Various Locations - San Benito County, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full plans and estimates (P&E) documents for the roadway restriping of various locations including surface treatment design, striping, signing and cost estimating. The P&E was produced on an expedited schedule to use the allocated funds for the projects.

San Benito County, On-Call Services, Wright Road Rehabilitation Improvement Project - San Benito County, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including pavement design, grading design, construction details design, drainage design, signing and striping design, cost estimating, preparation of technical specifications and utility coordination.

Monterey County, Las Lomas Drive Bicycle Lane and Pedestrian Project - Monterey County, CA Mr. Silva served as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for the roadway portion including, geometric review, utility coordination, drainage design, grading design, construction details design, signing, striping and cost estimating.

Monterey County, On-Call Services, Road Rehabilitation Project (Harkins Road, Hunter Lane, Hitchcock Road & Foster Road) - Monterey County, CA
Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including structural design, grading design, construction details design, drainage design, cost estimating and preparation of technical specifications.

Monterey County, Davis Road Bridge Replacement and Road Widening - Monterey County, CA Mr. Silva served as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for the roadway portion including, geometric review, utility coordination, structural section design, drainage design, grading design, signing, striping and cost estimating.

Sonoma County, 2019 FEMA Geysers Road Storm Damage Repairs - Sonoma County, CA During the 2019 February winter storms, Geysers Road suffered multiple slipouts and needed engineering design to repair the roadway. Mr. Silva served as Project Engineer and was responsible for the engineering support during the completion of environmental permits and funding requests, engineering design of the roadways, including minor realignments and the final PS&E for Geysers Road repairs to the Client.

Sonoma County, Geysers Road Bridge over Big Sulphur Creek - Sonoma County, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for the roadway design portion of this bridge project including, structural section design, drainage design, retaining wall modeling, grading design, and cost estimating.

Sonoma County, Geysers Road Bridge over Frasier Creek - Sonoma County, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer and Project Oversight for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for the roadway design portion including, establishing design criteria, geometric design, structural section design, drainage design, retaining wall modeling, grading design and cost estimating.

City of Vacaville, Ulatis Creek Bank Stabilization - Vacaville, CA Mr. Silva serves as Project Engineer for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including, structural section design, drainage design, retaining wall modeling, grading design and cost estimating.

Page 381 of 755 ends

CAMERON J. PINKERTON, PE LEAD BRIDGE / STRUCTURES PROJECT ENGINEER YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 19 YEARS WITH TRC: 19
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2004 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

Professional Engineer, California, (#73288), 2008

Mr. Pinkerton has experience in all aspects of the analysis and design of transportation structures. His experience ranges from advance planning studies and type selections to field investigations, dynamic and seismic analyses, preliminary and final design, through detailing and plan set production. Mr. Pinkerton has also prepared quantities and engineering estimates for numerous projects. Additional experience includes construction inspection and construction support, office engineering to support field generated design changes, shop drawing reviews and responding to contractor requests for information (RFIs).

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects were completed while employed with TRC.

San Benito County, Roadway Rehabilitation Improvement Projects - San Benito County, CA Mr. Pinkerton serves as Structures Project Engineer for the design and preparation of full PS&E documents for roadway design including pavement design, structure design, and drainage design on segments of ten road rehabilitation projects. The PS&E was produced on an expedited schedule in order to use the allocated funds for the projects. TRC is now assisting with construction support.

San Benito County, Southside Road 5000 Block – Slip Out Repairs - San Benito County, CA Mr. Pinkerton served as Structures Project Engineer for engineering design of retaining structures and roadways including minor realignments. The plans included two soldier pile walls, drainage design, road re-alignment, erosion control, grading, utility coordination, and traffic handling. Guard rails were designed to protect the retaining wall and the public from the embankment drop off. A final PS&E package was prepared on an expedited schedule for advertising and the project constructed. Mr. Pinkerton provided construction support services.

City of Visalia, SR 198 / Akers Street Interchange Improvements and Roadway Widening – Visalia, CA Mr. Pinkerton served as Structures Project Engineer for the preliminary and final PS&E for the widening of Akers Street to include left turn lanes at the SR 198 interchange. The project also proposed ramp modifications at the SR 198 interchange and local road modifications. This project included traffic studies, surveys, right of way engineering, utility coordination, local and state agency coordination, roadway design, structure design, drainage design, traffic signal design, pavement delineation, and landscape design. The project has been constructed and construction support was provided. Project awards won include ASCE Fresno Chapter Roadway / Highway Project of the Year and APWA Central California Chapter Public Works Project of the Year– Transportation Honorable Mention.

City of Visalia, Plaza Drive / SR 198 Interchange Upgrade and Roadway Widening - Visalia, CA Mr. Pinkerton served as Design Check Engineer on this project for the Project Report and PS&E for the widening of the existing overcrossing on SR 198, ramp widening with retaining walls and terminus signalization for two off-ramps, and the widening of 1.5 miles of Plaza Drive. This project included traffic studies, drainage studies, surveys, right of way engineering, landscape design along with roadway engineering for the 1.6-mile long

Page 382 of 755 ends

CAMERON J. PINKERTON, PE
TRCcompanies.com

widening of this two-lane roadway to a four lane with landscape median and left-turn lanes. TRC provided construction support. Project awards won include ASCE Project of the Year; APWA Project of the Year; and the TCAG Outstanding Economic Development Project.

Monterey County, Las Lomas Drive Bicycle Lane and Pedestrian Project– Monterey, CA Mr. Pinkerton serves as Structures Project Engineer for developing plans and cost estimates for approximately 1320 feet (25 miles) of Las Lomas Drive from Hall Road to Thomas Road. The scope consists of sidewalks, class II bicycle lanes, roadway improvements including but not limited to widening, curb and gutter, drainage inlets, retaining walls and a water treatment facility. The design and engineering follow local, State and Federal guidelines.

Monterey County, Davis Road Widening and Bridge Replacement - Salinas, CA Mr. Pinkerton serves as Bridge Project Engineer for the widening of 2.2 miles of arterial roadway from two lanes to four lanes of traffic, including a new 1700-foot-long bridge over the Salinas River. A combined Project Study Report/Project Report was completed, and PS&E includes roadway widening, pavement analysis, preparing a roadway drainage report, preparing a storm water data report, drainage design, utility coordination, right of way coordination, access road constructions for adjacent farmers, pavement delineation, and stage construction. All work is to Caltrans’ standards as State & Federal funding is being used for the project. He has been instrumental in all aspects of the bridge design. Design is complete and the County is obtaining right of way and the TRC team is securing final environmental permits. Utilities are being relocated now with construction to begin Fall 2024.

City of San Luis Obispo, Railroad Safety Multi-Use Trail/Grade Separation, Taft to Pepper - San Luis Obispo, CA Mr. Pinkerton served as Bridge Project Engineer for preliminary and final design for the Taft to Phillips extension, which included a bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) track. The alignment connects to an existing Class I path at Taft and used NACTO's Urban Bikeway Design Guidelines to develop a Two-Way Cycle Track Facility that paralleled UPRR Tracks and took advantage of the existing California Overcrossing of US 101. TRC assisted the City in obtaining $3.24 million of ATP funding for this project. The project has been constructed and Mr. Pinkerton provided construction support. Project awards won include ASCE Chapter, Section, and Regional Bikeways and Trails Project of the Year.

Sonoma County Department of Transportation and Public Works, On-Call Engineering Design Services- Geysers Road Emergency Repairs (Task Order #3) - Sonoma County, CA During the 2017 February winter storms, Geysers Road suffered multiple slipouts. This task order covers three of these. TO #3A is located at PM 23.78 and is approximately 160 feet long. TO #3B is located at PM 29.77 and is approximately 180 feet long. TO #3C, PM 36.75, consists of a slipout and a failed retaining wall. TRC provided final PS&E. The project was constructed. Mr. Pinkerton served as Project Engineer and provided construction support services.

City of Santa Cruz, Murray Street/Yacht Harbor Bridge Retrofit - Santa Cruz, CA Mr. Pinkerton served as Senior Bridge Engineer for bridge and roadway improvements, right-of-way, and traffic PS&E associated with the seismic retrofit of the bridge. Extensive relocation of yacht harbor facilities was required. Extensive coordination was required with UPRR which owns a bridge adjoining this structure. The PS&E included soldier pile retaining walls, storm drain design, roadway and bridge design, and constructing temporary facilities to maintain current business operations for the Port during construction. Over $10 Million in HBP funding was obtained by TRC. Construction is planned to start in fall 2024.

Page 383 of 755 ends

KIANA M. NEGORO, PE BRIDGE / STRUCTURES DESIGN ENGINEER YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 9 YEARS WITH TRC: 9
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, California State University, Fresno, 2014 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

Professional Engineer, California, (#88362), 2017

Ms. Negoro is experienced in the preparation of bridge plans, structural calculations, cost estimates, and specifications as well as review of construction submittals. She has recently stepped into the role of acting Deputy Project Manager for multiple local projects where she is responsible for the coordination with the client, project team, subconsultants, and regulatory agencies as required for advancing the projects, tracks the project budget, and prepares progress reports for the client. Her experience includes bridge replacements and rehabilitations as well as retaining walls and culverts. Ms. Negoro has taken on challenging work as a designer on many complex projects including the Third Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project in San Francisco, California and the I-70 Bridges in West Virginia. She also served as a structural quality control inspector on the Lake Isabella Dam Safety Modification project east of Bakersfield, California.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE | All projects were completed while employed with TRC.

City of Visalia, Caldwell Avenue Widening from Santa Fe to Lovers Lane – Visalia, CA Ms. Negoro serves as Design Engineer for the structural components of this project as a subconsultant. This project includes two box culverts: a single-cell box culvert being replaced with a double-cell reinforced concrete box culvert, and an existing double-cell box culvert being extended approximately 37.5 feet in total to accommodate the widened roadway. TRC is working with the prime consultant who is responsible for roadway design. TRC has completed 95% design for the project.

City of Clovis, Gould Canal Culvert at Leonard Avenue – Clovis, CA Ms. Negoro served as Design Engineer to provide hydraulic and structural engineering services for the replacement of a single span flat slab bridge with a new culvert crossing on Gould Canal at Leonard Avenue. TRC designed the new 7’ tall x 14’ wide double cell cast-in-place reinforced concrete box culvert with flared wingwalls. TRC also designed a new maintenance catwalk on the upstream side of the structure, which was a requirement of the Fresno Irrigation District. Construction was completed in 2018.

Tulare County, Avenue 428 Sand Creek Bridge Replacement – Orosi, CA Ms. Negoro serves as Senior Bridge Engineer and acting Deputy Project Manager for the replacement of this three-span flat slab bridge with a new 75 ft. long, single-span cast-in-place, prestressed voided slab bridge. Life cycle cost analysis and justification report were prepared to justify replacement of the bridge to Caltrans.

Environmental assistance was also provided for this project. TRC is working with Tulare County staff who are responsible for roadway design. TRC has completed 95% design for the project.

Tulare County, Avenue 280 Road Widening Project – Visalia, CA Ms. Negoro serves as Senior Bridge Engineer and acting Deputy Project Manager for the structural components of this project as a subconsultant. This project includes replacing this three-span flat slab bridge with a new, 49 ft. long, single-span precast, prestressed voided slab bridge. Hydraulic models were created to ensure the replacement bridge would be the most economical while meeting freeboard requirements. These models and

Page 384 of 755 ends

KIANA M. NEGORO, PE
TRCcompanies.com
additional analyses were presented in the Design Hydraulic Study. Life cycle cost analysis and type selection report were prepared for the bridge. The structural aspects of this project also include two culverts along Extension Ditch that will be analyzed and either extended or replaced. TRC is working with the prime consultant who is responsible for roadway design. TRC has received Type Selection approval from Tulare County for the replacement bridge and is working on 65% design.

Fresno County, Fresno Canal at Del Rey Avenue Bridge Replacement – Sanger, CA Ms. Negoro serves as Design Engineer and acting Deputy Project Manager for the replacement of this three- span, structurally deficient, timber stringer bridge. The new bridge will be a clear span, precast/prestressed box beam bridge with composite concrete topping slab. It will be approximately the same length as the existing bridge, but wider to satisfy current roadway standards. TRC has completed 60% design for this project.

Fresno County, Fresno Canal at McKinley Avenue Bridge Replacement – Sanger, CA Ms. Negoro served as Design Engineer for the replacement of this two-span, structurally deficient, timber stringer bridge. The new bridge is a clear span precast/prestressed voided slab bridge with composite concrete topping slab and is approximately 10’ longer than the existing bridge to improve channel hydraulics and alleviate scour and 10’ wider to satisfy current roadway standards. Ms. Negoro also provided construction support and observed the girder placement and deck pour. Construction was completed in 2020.

Project awards won include ASCE San Francisco Section Outstanding Structural Engineering Project of the Year award and an ASCE Fresno Chapter Roadway/Highway Project of the Year award.

Fresno County, El Dorado Avenue Bridge at Arroyo Pasajero Replacement – Coalinga, CA Ms. Negoro serves as Senior Bridge Engineer and acting Deputy Project Manager for the replacement of this 152-feet long and 33.8-feet wide bridge with a new 260-foot long, two-span, cast-in-place post-tensioned box girder bridge. The existing bridge is scour critical and overtopped by the 100-year flood event. The new bridge will be significantly longer than the existing bridge and the roadway profile will be raised approximately 5 feet to pass design flows. TRC has received Type Selection approval from Caltrans for the replacement bridge and has completed 60% design.

City of Porterville, Jaye Street / Tule River Bridge Rehabilitation – Porterville, CA Ms. Negoro performed quantity calculations, reviewed construction submittals, and observed the deck pour for this rehabilitation project. The existing 33’-9” wide, eight-span reinforced concrete slab bridge was widened in kind to a total width of 82’-10”. To transition the pathway underneath the bridge, retaining walls were added in-line with the south abutment. The retaining walls are supported on a pile foundation to match the abutments and included a gutter to carry drainage and a cable railing for safety. Construction was completed in 2018.

Project awards won include ASCE Project of the Year at the Chapter, Section, and Regional Levels; and the TCAG Local Motion Outstanding Road Project of the Year.

San Francisco Public Works, Third Street Bridge Rehabilitation – San Francisco, CA Ms. Negoro served as Design Engineer for the bridge load rating of the steel truss members, floor beams, and stringers. The Third Street Bridge is a single leaf bascule bridge in the City of San Francisco that crosses the Mission Creek Marina adjacent to China Basin. The bridge is a historical bridge that was designed in 1931 and constructed in 1932. The bridge is a riveted steel through truss supported on reinforced concrete piers founded on timber piles. The south approach is a reinforced concrete slab supported on concrete pile extensions. She assisted in creating spreadsheets to determine the capacities and load rating factors for the truss members, floor beams, and stringers and providing construction support. Construction was completed in 2020.

Project awards won include Silver Level Award for Infrastructure more than $20M and an ASCE Fresno Branch Historical Renovation Project of the Year.

Page 385 of 755 ends
← All documents from this meeting