Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, June 2, 2026 (part 4 of 6)

ERINN SILVA | PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER
Ms. Silva has worked on public and private projects throughout California since 2003. At GPA, she oversees preparation of all levels of technical study and environmental documentation, leads coastal permitting efforts through local agencies and the California Coastal Commission, and manages the environmental process for various phases of highly complex transportation projects, specifically in California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) Districts 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12. She has expertise in directing, researching, writing, and editing environmental documents pursuant to both National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), with a focus on compliance with Caltrans’ Standard Environmental Reference and Local Assistance Procedures Manual requirements. Much of her experience is related to local transportation projects processed through Caltrans’ Local Assistance Program. Additionally, Ms. Silva conducts public outreach tasks. She has worked closely with clients to prepare for and present at public scoping meetings and hearings related to the circulation and review of environmental documents.

Ms. Silva excels in working with local, state, and federal agencies; her diplomatic approach to projects allows her to offer practical solutions to arising challenges, and to move projects forward in a streamlined manner.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mission Mile Sepulveda Project, Los Angeles County (2023 -Ongoing). The City of Los Angeles, in cooperation with Caltrans District 7, proposes to provide safety improvements and connections for pedestrians and bicyclists to neighborhood parks, cultural sites, and two planned major transit projects along a 3.25-mile corridor of Sepulveda Boulevard and 0.5 -mile corridor of Brand Boulevard via the Mission Mile Sepulveda Project. The project is located entirely in north Los Angeles’ San Fernando Valley and funded by Active Transportation Program Cycle 5. GPA has been contracted to perform NEPA and CEQA compliance services through the project’s Project Approval/Environment Documents ( PA/ED) phase. Ms. Silva is overseeing the preparation of a Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form, which will lead to a NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE). Several technical studies are required to support this determination, including studies related to cultural resources, biological resources, air quality, and hazardous materials. It is anticipated the appropriate level of CEQA documentation would be a Notice of Exemption (NOE).

Hueneme Road Widening, Ventura County (2022 -Ongoing). The County of Ventura proposes to widen an approximate 1.93 -mile portion of Hueneme Road, from Edison Drive to approximately 1,200 feet east of Rice Avenue. This phase of widening will be accomplished as part of an overall plan to widen Hueneme Road through five segments of work. Ms. Silva is overseeing the preparation of a PES and technical studies that include a Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts), Area of Potential Effects (APE), Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), Visual Impact Assessment, Water Quality Assessment Memorandum, Community Impacts Assessment/Farmlands, and Tree Survey. GPA is managing the preparation of studies related to cultural resources, hazardous materials, traffic analysis, air quality/greenhouse gas, noise and vibration, hydrology, and relocation impacts that are being prepared by subconsultants. These studies will inform an Initial Study/Streamlined Environmental Assessment (IS/EA), which will be prepared by GPA. Once the IS has been prepared, if it is determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be required for compliance with CEQA, GPA will initiate preparation of the EIR in place of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) following completion of agency comments, public comments, and technical analysis. The document will be prepared as a joint document with the Streamlined EA required for NEPA.

Arroyo Pasajero Bridge Replacement, Fresno County (2021 -Ongoing). The County of Fresno Department of Public Works and Planning proposes to replace the existing bridge on South El Dorado Avenue, which crosses Arroyo Pasajero, also known as Los Gatos Creek. The existing bridge over Arroyo Pasajero is located approximately 2.0 miles north of West Jayne Avenue and 7.0 miles east of the city limits of Coalinga. Ms.

Silva is the task order manager, directing the preparation of a Natural Environment Study, Aquatic Resources Delineation, Water Quality Assessment Report, and Section 7 consultation initiation package, including the Biological Assessment. She is also managing the preparation of an APE map, HPSR, Archaeological Survey Report by subconsultants. During the course of the Section 106 process, Caltrans requested augmented Native American outreach; Ms. Silva is currently leading that process for swift completion of the NEPA compliance process.

EDUCATION
A.S., Business
Management, El Camino
College, 2010

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
20 YEARS WITH GPA
15

Page 386 of 755 ends

7th Standard Road Widening Project, Shafter (2020-Ongoing). The City of Shafter, in coordination with Caltrans District 6, proposes to widen 7th Standard Road from a two -lane highway to a multilane divided expressway in the City of Shafter, City of Bakersfield, and the County of Kern. Ms. Silva is the Principal -in-Charge, providing project oversight and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) reviews.

Mineral King Road Bridge, Tulare County (2014 -Ongoing). The County of Tulare proposed to either rehabilitate or replace the existing Mineral King Bridge on Mineral King Road over the east fork of the Kaweah River. Following coordination related to t he Section 106 and Section 4(f) processes, rehabilitation was selected as the only feasible alternative. Ms. Silva managed the preparation of the PES, which led to a NEPA CE. Several technical studies were required to support the NEPA CE, including studies related to water quality, biological resources, aesthetics, hazardous materials, historic resources, Section 4(f), and Native American consultation. She conducted public outreach activities and public information meetings associated with the environmental proc ess.

Following completion of these technical studies, she prepared the Environmental Commitments Record (ECR) for completion of the NEPA CE. After additional concrete testing, it was determined that the rehabilitation alternative would no longer be feasible , and a replacement alternative was selected. Ms. Silva oversaw a NEPA revalidation and supplemental technical studies, most notably additional Native American Outreach and revised findings for visual impacts. She is overseeing the preparation of the regulat ory permits for the project.

Alexandria and Five Mile Slough Culvert Replacement, Stockton (2021 -2022). The City of Stockton proposes to replace the existing culvert in Five Mile Slough beneath Alexandria Place. The project is located beneath Alexandria Place just north of Lincoln R oad; the existing culvert runs between File Mile Creek to the east and Five Mile slough to the west. Ms. Silva was the principal -in-charge responsible for project oversight. She also provided QA/QC of the CEQA NOE.

Avenue 174 Friant -Kern Canal Bridge Replacement, Tulare County (2017 -Ongoing). The County of Tulare proposed to replace the existing Avenue 174 Friant -Kern Canal Bridge, located north of the city of Porterville, approximately .8 mile west of SR -65. As the Project Manager, Ms. Silva oversaw preparation of the PES, which led to a NEPA CE. Several technical studies were required to support the NEPA CE, including studies related to noise, visual resources, biological resources, water quality, hazardous mat erials, cultural resources, Section 4(f), and farmlands. Environmental compliance was completed in January 2021. Once project design advances, GPA will prepare the regulatory permit applications.

Road D112 Over Bates Slough Replacement, Tulare County (2017 -2022). The County of Tulare proposed to replace the existing Road D112 over Bates Slough, located at the southwest boundary of the city of Tulare, approximately .28 mile west of SR -99. As the Project Director, Ms. Silva oversaw the preparation of the PES, which led to a NEPA CE. Several technical studies were required to support the NEPA CE, including studies related to biological resources, water quality, hazardous materials, farmlands, and cu ltural resources. Environmental compliance was completed during the PA/ED phase, and regulatory permitting was completed during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) phase of the project.

Road D112 at North Branch Tule River Bridge, Tulare County (2017 -2022). The County of Tulare proposed to replace the existing Road D112 Bridge over the north branch of the Tule River. As the Project Director, Ms. Silva conducted a field review with Ca ltrans and supervised several surveys in the project area. She managed preparation of the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) lead ing to a NEPA Categorical Exclusion. Several technical studies were required to support the NEPA Categorical Exclusion, including studies related to biological resources, water quality, noise, and cultural and historic resources. Environmental compliance was comp leted during the PA/ED phase, and regulatory permitting was completed during the PS&E phase of the project.

Santa Claus Lane Bikeway, Santa Barbara County (2013 -2022). Caltrans District 5, in cooperation with the Santa Barbara County of Association of Governments, the City of Carpinteria, and County of Santa Barbara, proposed to construct a Class I bike path on southbound U.S. Highway 101 between Estero Street near the Carpinteria Avenue off -ramp in the City of Carpinteria, and Sand Point Road in Santa Barbara County. Ms. Silva was the project manager directing completion of all environmental and permitting task s.

GPA prepared several technical studies to support conclusions in the environmental analysis, including studies related to bio logical resources, visual resources, and water quality. GPA oversaw technical studies prepared by subconsultants related to hazardous materials and cultural resources. Ms. Silva was responsible for obtaining a Coastal Development Permit ( CDP) from the City of Carpinteria for the portion of bike path under their jurisdiction, and a CDP from Santa Barbara County for the portion under their jurisdiction. She also led the effort to obtain regulatory permits required for the project, and managed all coordination eff orts related to required off-site mitigation for coastal wetland impacts. The bike path was opened to the public in June 2023.

Page 387 of 755 ends

SAUL MELGAREJO JR., PLS
Calvada Surveying, Inc. | Project Manager | POC

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering - Geospatial Engineering Emphasis, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Land Surveyor, CA P.L.S. No. 9807

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member of CLSA
Member of ACEC

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Palm Desert Groundwater Replenishment Project, Palm Desert, CA (September 2018) Mr. Melgarejo served as the Project Manager for the topographic survey for Design Purposes of the Coachella Valley Water District (Palm Desert Operations) Owned Facility located at 75525 Hovley Ln E, Palm Desert, CA 92211. The project consisted of providin g a full topographic survey of roughly 230 ACRES.

Calvada provided Professional Land Surveying Services including Topographic Surveys, Boundary Mapping, Aerial Photogrammetry Survey and Survey Control. The project was completed within 1 month from field to end delivery. The aerial survey was used by Stantec as the basemap for their planning and design.

Coachella Cultivation Farm Projects #1 and #2, Coachella, CA (September 2017) Mr. Melgarejo served as the Project Manager for the topographic survey for Design Purposes of the Coachella Cultivation Farms Facility located on Harrison Avenue in Coachella, CA. The project consisted of providing a full topographic survey of roughly 34 A CRES. Calvada provided Professional Land Surveying Services including Topographic Surveys, Boundary Mapping, Aerial Photogrammetry Survey and Survey Control. The project was completed within 20 days from field to end delivery. The aerial survey was used by Infrastructure Engineers as the basemap for their planning and design.

OWD - Cottonwood Sewer Pump Station Replacement Project, El Cajon, CA (March 2023) Calvada provided a topographic and boundary survey of the 1-acre area owned by Otay Water District. The survey was used by Wood Rodgers as their basemap for the new sewer pump station. Mr. Melgarejo managed the project from start to finish.

OWD - 870-1 Reservoir Floating Cover and Liner Replacement, San Diego, CA (April 2022) Calvada provided a topographic and boundary survey of the 18 -acre area owned by Otay Water District.

The survey was used by Wood Rodgers as their basemap for the reservoir improvements. Mr. Melgarejo managed the project from start to finish and managed the aerial survey along with the field and office staff.

TOS-25 Stormwater Capture Parks Program – 10 Parks, Hollywood, CA (January 2021) Mr. Melgarejo was the project manager who, from start to finish, managed the topographic survey of 10 parks located in North Hollywood ranging from 40 - 100 ACRES each in size. The surveys would be used for future stormwater design purposes. The survey included detailed cross sections of the adjacent streets and included topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks and all visible utilities. The topographic survey also included contours that were utilized by the design group to a id in the design.

Project also included right of way boundary based on the existing record maps.

Page 388 of 755 ends

BRIEF BIO
Mr. Melgarejo is a California Licensed Land Surveyor and has worked in the field of land surveying since June of 2006. He is the Project Manager for the Environmental and Engineering Divisions and has managed projects for some of the industry’s largest cli ents such as CH2MHill, TRC and Arcadis. He is experienced in topographic mapping, boundary survey, environmental compliance and analysis as well as High -Definition Laser Scanning. In Mr. Melgarejo’s present capacity as Environmental & Topographic/Aerial Su rvey Project Manager he is responsible for CAD team oversight, QA/QC, Management and Technology development, project coordination, supervision and delivery. He is also responsible for finalizing all project control including aerial targets.

Page 389 of 755 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

JOHN ROWLAND, PE, TE

SENIOR TRAFFIC ENGINEER

Education and Qualifications
Fields of Special
Competence
Traffic Signal and Street Lighting Design Traffic Impact Studies Traffic Impact Studies / Traffic Operational Analyses
Pavement Delineation / Signage / Traffic Handling
Education Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering
California State University, Fresno
Graduate Courses
University of California, Irvine
Registration Professional Civil Engineer – California 52753 Professional Traffic Engineer – California 2484
Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers
Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society
Background
Mr. Rowland has over 33 years of experience in the fields of civil and traffic, and has been with Peters Engineering Group for more than 24 years. As the senior trafﬁc engineer for Peters Engineering Group, Mr. Rowland has served as a project manager for numerous commercial, industrial, residential, and public works projects. Mr. Rowland is experienced in traffic engineering design, including traffic signals, street lighting, pavement delineation, signage, and stage construction/traffic handling. Mr. Rowland has been responsible for the design of new traffic signals and modifications of existing traffic signals at hundreds of intersections. Many of the designs have included interconnect and intelligent transportation systems facilities, pedestrian facilities, and flashing beacons. Mr. Rowland’s design experience includes many projects requiring Caltrans encroachment permits, including signalization of intersections, modifications of freeway interchanges, and widening of freeway segments.

Recent Experience
11th Avenue and Houston Avenue Traffic Signals, Hanford, California Mr. Ro wland was re sponsible for design of improvements at the intersection of 11 th Avenue and Houston Avenue. The project included the installation of traffic signals, installation of left turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches, and widening of the intersection. Prior to providing the traffic signal plans and specifi cations, Mr. Rowland developed projections of future traffi c volumes and performed traffi c analyses with recommendations for the intersection lane geometry, lengths of turn lanes, and traffic signal phasing.

Page 390 of 755 ends

JOHN ROWLAND, PE, TE

Page 2 of 2 ends

Olive Avenue Street Lighting and Traffic Signal Design, Madera, California Mr. Rowland was responsible for electrical plans for the widening of Olive Avenue between Gateway Drive and Knox Street. The City of Madera requested recommendations for spacing and illumination of street lights. Mr. Rowland supervised the preparation of isolux diagrams for the street lighting layout.

The project included design of new traffic signals at two intersections (Olive / Roosevelt Avenues and Olive Avenue / Knox Street) and design of traffic signal modifications at the intersection of Olive Avenue and Gateway Drive. The project included substantial coordination with the UPRR and preparation of railroad preemption calculations.

Irwin Avenue and Hanford-Armona Road Traffic Signals, Hanford, California Responsible for de sign of traffic signals and associated improvements at the intersection of Hanford - Armona Road and Irwin Street. The project included installation of traffic signals, left-turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches, and reconstruction of all curb ramps to meet ADA requirements. Prior to providing the traffi c signal plans and specifi cations, Mr. Rowland developed projections of future traffi c volumes and performed traffic analyses with recommendations for the intersection lane geometry, lengths of turn lanes, and traffic signal phasing. 13th Avenue and Grangeville Boulevard Traffic Signals, Hanford, California Mr. Rowland was responsible for traffic signal design services for the improvements at the intersection of 13th Avenue and Grangeville Boulevard. The project included installation of traffic signals and associated civil improvements, including median noses, left-turn lanes, right-turn lanes, curb returns, and curb ramps. Mr. Row land also performed analyses prior to the design to identify the required intersection configuration and lengths of turn lanes.

Cedar Avenue / Kings Canyon Road Street Lighting, Fresno, California Responsible for design plans to remove existing street lights on wooden poles with overhead conductors and to replace them with new City-standard street lights on Cedar Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road.

The project included modification of traffic signal facilities and coordination with City of Fresno street light maintenance personnel to develop the desired approach acceptable to the City. The City -standard street lights were connected to an existing Tesco meter pedestal serving traffic signals at the intersection.

Temperance and Dakota Avenues Traffic Signals and Street Lighting, Fresno, California Responsible for design of new traffic signals for the intersection of Temperance and Dakota Avenues, including modification of an existing street lighting system along Dakota Avenue between Temperance and Applegate Avenues. The design included disconnecting an existing street light point of service and serving the street lights from the Tesco meter pedestal serving the new traffic signals.

Castroville Bicycle/Pedestrian Path Lighting - Monterey County, California Responsible for design of bridge deck lighting, pathway lighting, street lighting, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons for a bridge project over the Union Pacific Railroad.

Branciforte Creek Bridge and Multi-Use Trail Lighting - Santa Cruz, California Responsible for design of bridge deck lighting and decorative pathway lighting for a bridge project over Branciforte Creek north of Soquel Avenue.

Railroad Safety Trail, Taft to Pepper - San Luis Obispo, California Responsible for electrical design between California Boulevard and Pepper Street, including bridge lighting and street lighting, for the proposed safety trail and bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad in San Luis Obispo, California. The design included preparation of an isolux diagram on the bridge deck to identify lighting levels and avoid dark areas.

Page 391 of 755 ends

Patrick Boyd, ASLA
Principal Landscape Architect
PO Box 27616 Fresno, California 93729 | Phone: 559.472.9966 x102(w) 559.901.8647(m) | eMail: [email protected]

Education: BLA – Professional Landscape Architecture, Cal Poly, SLO, 1998 Licensure: California Licensed Landscape Architect #4682 Experience: Designlab 252 – Principal Landscape Architect – 12 years Quad Knopf – A Private Multidisciplinary A&E Firm – 2 years California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) – 8 years Technical Skills: General: High context planning skills to balance needs with space; multi-generational design; Planting design for lush landscapes that meet strict water usage requirements; MWELO documentation; design for minimum maintenance.

Specializations include Transportation design; Interactive water play; design for dogs; creative play design; sustainable design.

Professional: American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), Member Historic Preservation Commission, City of Fresno, Chair

Mr. Boyd is very familiar with work throughout the State of California in projects that have included all aspects of landscape architecture. His work experience over 20 years has made him a significant asset on multi-disciplinary teams. This deep experience working with other disciplines allows him to contribute throughout the design process and provide input that saves both project time and money. His reputation is for high design aesthetics delivered on time and on budget.

As Principal Landscape Architect at Designlab 252 Patrick has had the opportunity to be lead designer on many successfully completed and on-going State, regional, and local projects including: Veterans Boulevard and Trail, Fresno, CA; Eaton Plaza Master Plan, Fresno, CA; Courthouse Park, Fresno, CA; Herndon Avenue median, Fresno, CA; Various projects at the Fresno Chaffee Zoo (including the new Warthogs exhibit), Fresno, CA; Grundfos Water Conservation/Recovery Project, Fresno, CA; and many others.

Page 392 of 755 ends

10680 WHITE ROCK ROAD,
SUITE 100
RANCHO CORDOVA,CA 95670
T:916.366.0632

Page 393 of 755 ends

Page 32 of 34 ends

January 2026
On Call Architecture and Engineering Consultant Services for FEDERAL Projects TRC Engineers, Inc.

City of Hanford
A&E Consultant Agreement

ATTACHMENT “B”
Consultants’ Fee Schedule

Page 394 of 755 ends

January 1, 2026

HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
2026-2028

LABOR RATES

Personnel Classification

Principal-In-Charge
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Senior Engineer
Engineer II
Engineer I
CADD Supervisor
CADD Technician
Data Processor/Operator
Administrative Assistant
Intern

2026 Hourly Rate

$350.00
$330.00
$290.00
$220.00
$190.00
$155.00
$130.00
$165.00
$125.00
$90.00
$90.00
$55.00
2027 Hourly Rate

$360.00
$340.00
$300.00
$230.00
$200.00
$160.00
$135.00
$170.00
$130.00
$90.00
$90.00
$55.00

2028 Hourly Rate

$370.00
$350.00
$310.00
$240.00
$210.00
$170.00
$140.00
$175.00
$135.00
$95.00
$95.00
$60.00

Rates are subject to change annually starting on January 1, 2029, with anticipated increases equivalent to the prevailing rate of inflation at such times.

Similarly titled staff will be billed at equivalent rates (e.g. Senior Scientist, Senior Geologist, Senior Environmental Planner, etc. will be billed at the hourly rate for a Senior Engineer)

DIRECT EXPENSE UNIT RATES

Mileage: Current IRS Mileage Rate
Per Diem: Current State of CA DPA Rates
Subconsultants: 5% markup, unless prohibited

Other direct costs including travel, lodging, telephone, fax, reproduction, and postage will be billed at actual cost. Rental cars may be used, in which case such rental charges and fuel would be billed in lieu of mileage.

This proposal expressly excludes any and all taxes, tariffs, duties, and other similar charges or fees imposed by any governmental authority (collectively, "Taxes and Tariffs"). The prices and fees quoted in TRC’s proposal do not include any such Taxes and Tariffs. The Client shall be solely responsible for the payment of all applicable Taxes and Tariffs arising from or related to the work contemplated by this proposal. If TRC or its subcontractors are required to pay Taxes and Tariffs on behalf of the Client, the Client shall promptly reimburse TRC for the full invoiced amount thereof.

Page 395 of 755 ends

Armando D. DuPont, Professional Land Surveyor 7780
DVBE MBE SBE CERTIFIED

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING
Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule (2024)
Item Description Unit Unit Price
Field Support
Field Survey Crew & Equipment (Prevailing Wage)* Hour $375.00 Round Trip Travel Time & Costs Hour $160.00
Office Support
Principal Hour $265.00
Director Surveying/Professional Land Surveyor Hour $225.00 Senior Project Manager Hour $190.00
Project Surveyor Hour $175.00
GPS Post Processing Hour $165.00
Survey Technician Hour $160.00
Drafting/AutoCAD Technician Hour $125.00
Accounting / Clerical Hour $87.00
Reimbursable Costs
In-House Reproductions Cost + 15%
Printing and Materials Cost + 15%
Parking and Tolls Cost + 15%
Express Mail, Courier, Next Day Service Cost + 15%
Special Sub-Consultant Services (GPR, etc.) Cost + 10%
Miscellaneous Services
Per Diem (when required) Day Per GSA Schedule
Consultation in Connection with Litigation Hour $450.00 Transportation (per 2024 IRS Mileage Rate) Mile $0.655
Overtime and Saturday Rates
Hour 1.5 times Hourly Rate
Hourly rates good for 2024.
*4 or 8 Hour Minimum

Page 396 of 755 ends

Armando D. DuPont, Professional Land Surveyor 7780
DVBE MBE SBE CERTIFIED

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING
Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule (2025)
Item Description Unit Unit Price
Field Support
Field Survey Crew & Equipment (Prevailing Wage)* Hour $385.00 Round Trip Travel Time & Costs Hour $165.00
Office Support
Principal Hour $273.00
Director Surveying/Professional Land Surveyor Hour $232.00 Senior Project Manager Hour $195.00
Project Surveyor Hour $180.00
GPS Post Processing Hour $170.00
Survey Technician Hour $165.00
Drafting/AutoCAD Technician Hour $130.00
Accounting / Clerical Hour $90.00
Reimbursable Costs
In-House Reproductions Cost + 15%
Printing and Materials Cost + 15%
Parking and Tolls Cost + 15%
Express Mail, Courier, Next Day Service Cost + 15%
Special Sub-Consultant Services (GPR, etc.) Cost + 10%
Miscellaneous Services
Per Diem (when required) Day Per GSA Schedule
Consultation in Connection with Litigation Hour $465.00 Transportation (per 2025 IRS Mileage Rate) Mile TBD
Overtime and Saturday Rates
Hour 1.5 times Hourly Rate
Hourly rates good for 2025.
*4 or 8 Hour Minimum

Page 397 of 755 ends

Armando D. DuPont, Professional Land Surveyor 7780
DVBE MBE SBE CERTIFIED

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING
Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule (2026)
Item Description Unit Unit Price
Field Support
Field Survey Crew & Equipment (Prevailing Wage)* Hour $398.00 Round Trip Travel Time & Costs Hour $170.00
Office Support
Principal Hour $281.00
Director Surveying/Professional Land Surveyor Hour $239.00 Senior Project Manager Hour $202.00
Project Surveyor Hour $186.00
GPS Post Processing Hour $175.00
Survey Technician Hour $170.00
Drafting/AutoCAD Technician Hour $133.00
Accounting / Clerical Hour $92.00
Reimbursable Costs
In-House Reproductions Cost + 15%
Printing and Materials Cost + 15%
Parking and Tolls Cost + 15%
Express Mail, Courier, Next Day Service Cost + 15%
Special Sub-Consultant Services (GPR, etc.) Cost + 10%
Miscellaneous Services
Per Diem (when required) Day Per GSA Schedule
Consultation in Connection with Litigation Hour $477.00 Transportation (per 2025 IRS Mileage Rate) Mile TBD
Overtime and Saturday Rates
Hour 1.5 times Hourly Rate
Hourly rates good for 2026.
*4 or 8 Hour Minimum

Page 398 of 755 ends

Armando D. DuPont, Professional Land Surveyor 7780
DVBE MBE SBE CERTIFIED

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING
Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule (2027)
Item Description Unit Unit Price
Field Support
Field Survey Crew & Equipment (Prevailing Wage)* Hour $410.00 Round Trip Travel Time & Costs Hour $175.00
Office Support
Principal Hour $290.00
Director Surveying/Professional Land Surveyor Hour $246.00 Senior Project Manager Hour $208.00
Project Surveyor Hour $191.00
GPS Post Processing Hour $180.00
Survey Technician Hour $175.00
Drafting/AutoCAD Technician Hour $137.00
Accounting / Clerical Hour $95.00
Reimbursable Costs
In-House Reproductions Cost + 15%
Printing and Materials Cost + 15%
Parking and Tolls Cost + 15%
Express Mail, Courier, Next Day Service Cost + 15%
Special Sub-Consultant Services (GPR, etc.) Cost + 10%
Miscellaneous Services
Per Diem (when required) Day Per GSA Schedule
Consultation in Connection with Litigation Hour $492.00 Transportation (per 2025 IRS Mileage Rate) Mile TBD
Overtime and Saturday Rates
Hour 1.5 times Hourly Rate
Hourly rates good for 2027.
*4 or 8 Hour Minimum

Page 399 of 755 ends

Armando D. DuPont, Professional Land Surveyor 7780
DVBE MBE SBE CERTIFIED

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING
Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule (2028)
Item Description Unit Unit Price
Field Support
Field Survey Crew & Equipment (Prevailing Wage)* Hour $422.00 Round Trip Travel Time & Costs Hour $180.00
Office Support
Principal Hour $298.00
Director Surveying/Professional Land Surveyor Hour $253.00 Senior Project Manager Hour $214.00
Project Surveyor Hour $197.00
GPS Post Processing Hour $186.00
Survey Technician Hour $180.00
Drafting/AutoCAD Technician Hour $141.00
Accounting / Clerical Hour $98.00
Reimbursable Costs
In-House Reproductions Cost + 15%
Printing and Materials Cost + 15%
Parking and Tolls Cost + 15%
Express Mail, Courier, Next Day Service Cost + 15%
Special Sub-Consultant Services (GPR, etc.) Cost + 10%
Miscellaneous Services
Per Diem (when required) Day Per GSA Schedule
Consultation in Connection with Litigation Hour $506.00 Transportation (per 2025 IRS Mileage Rate) Mile TBD
Overtime and Saturday Rates
Hour 1.5 times Hourly Rate
Hourly rates good for 2028.
*4 or 8 Hour Minimum

Page 400 of 755 ends

EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Contract #
SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION Attachment: 2
"ON-CALL" A&E Design & Related Project Development & Construction Support Services Sub-Consultant: Designlab 252 Date: 09-04-2024

Page 1 of 1 ends

Fringe Ben. % Overhead % General Administration % Combined % NORMAL SAFE HARBOR RATE + + = 120.00%
PROJECT SPECIFIC "STAFF ASSISTANCE" *See footnote 6 + + = 120.00% FEE 10.00%

BILLING INFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION
Loaded Hourly Billing Rates Actual/
% or $ average hrly Hourly range for
Straight OT(1.5x) OT(2x) From To Increase rate class
Patrick Boyd, RLA Landscape Planting & Irrigation 185.11$ NC NC 01/01/24 12/31/24 0.00% 76.49$ Sr. Landscsape Architect 186.96$ NC NC 01/01/25 12/31/25 1.00% 77.25$ n/a 189.29$ NC NC 01/01/26 12/31/26 1.25% 78.22 $
192.13$ NC NC 01/01/27 12/31/27 1.50% 79.39 $
195.98$ NC NC 01/01/28 12/31/28 2.00% 80.98 $
(Exempt) Salary 199.90$ NC NC 01/01/29 12/31/29 2.00% 82.60 $ Scott Mears Landscape Planting & Irrigation 176.15$ NC NC 01/01/24 12/31/24 0.00% 72.79$ Contract/Project Manager 177.91$ NC NC 01/01/25 12/31/25 1.00% 73.52$ n/a 180.14$ NC NC 01/01/26 12/31/26 1.25% 74.44 $
182.84$ NC NC 01/01/27 12/31/27 1.50% 75.55 $
186.50$ NC NC 01/01/28 12/31/28 2.00% 77.06 $
(Exempt) Salary 190.23$ NC NC 01/01/29 12/31/29 2.00% 78.61 $ Konni Jones, CID Landscape Planting & Irrigation 179.66$ NC NC 01/01/24 12/31/24 0.00% 74.24$ Landscape Technician 181.46$ NC NC 01/01/25 12/31/25 1.00% 74.98$ n/a Certified Irrigation Designer183.73$ NC NC 01/01/26 12/31/26 1.25% 75.92 $ 186.48$ NC NC 01/01/27 12/31/27 1.50% 77.06 $
190.21$ NC NC 01/01/28 12/30/28 2.00% 78.60 $
(Exempt) Salary 194.02$ NC NC 12/31/28 12/31/29 2.00% 80.17 $

4. Caltrans Contract Manager’s pre-approval is required for any addition of staff not listed on the cost proposal. The billing rates for these employees, including those that fall under general classifications, will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual hourly rate on xx/xx/xx. Future escalations, if any, will be calculated and reimbursed in accordance with the percentage escalations agreed to in this cost proposal.

5. Hourly rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel listed on this cost proposal having similar experience.

Name/Classification Effective Date of
hourly rate

1. For all key team members that are listed on the Prime Consultant’s Organization Chart, list the name and corresponding job classification. For all other employees (i.e. support staff/non- professional) list only the job classification. Teams members subject to FLSA are not eligible for overtime.

2. For named employees enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, list the average hourly rate for that classification.

3. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an asterisk (*).

Page 401 of 755 ends

Attachment # 2
Date
ADM 2033 ODCs (Rev. 10/12) SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS

Page 18 ends

Contract #:

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT COST
Printing and Reproductions
A. In-house Printing N.C. N.C.

B. Outside Vendor Printing EA Actual *
Computer & Software
A. In-house Use N.C. N.C.

B. At CT offices only, per Task Order EA Actual *
and Contract Manager when
no equipment assigned by CT
Vehicle Expenses
A. Mileage mile **
B. Vehicle Actual ****
Delivery Services
A. Overnight Mail Service EA Actual *
B. Courier Service EA Actual *
Communications
A. Cellular Phone-monthly charges EA $35 ***
B.

Miscellaneous
A. Travel Expenses ** **
B. Construction Instruments N.C. N.C.

C. Film Camera, Film and Developing N.C. N.C.

D. Digital Camera Equipment N.C. N.C.

E. Field Personnel Safety Equipment N.C. N.C.

F. Office Supplies (only applicable EA Actual *
when employee assigned to CT Office)
N.C. denotes No Charge
(*) Actual cost per lease/access/purchase or other vendor arrangement with State authorization. Actual cost are competitive prices from appriopriate vendors in their respective industries (**) Pre-Approved Travel and Per-Diem Costs to be reimbursed shall be the Actual Costs, but Not to Exceed the rates stipulated in the department of transportation "Caltrans Travel Guide, Consultant/Contractors Travel Policy".
(***) Cellular cost is fixed at $35 amount maximum per month. (****) If CT requires an on call person to augment a survey crew and the person needs a vehicle per Task Order and Contract Manager.

Subconsultant: Designlab 252

Page 402 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. TBD Date
For Combined Rate 44.00% + 97.93% =
For Home Office Rate 0.00% + 0.00% =
For Field Office Rate 0.00% + 0.00% =
=
Actual or Avg. % or $
Straight3 OT(1.5x) OT(2x) From To Hourly Rate4 Increase 240.99$ N/A N/A 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 88.94$
253.04$ N/A N/A 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 93.39$ 5.00% 265.70$ N/A N/A 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 98.06$ 5.00% 278.98$ N/A N/A 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 102.96$ 5.00% 172.60$ N/A N/A 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 63.70$
181.23$ N/A N/A 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 66.89$ 5.00% 190.29$ N/A N/A 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 70.23$ 5.00% 199.81$ N/A N/A 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 73.74$ 5.00% 270.96$ 406.44$ 541.92$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 100.00 $ 79.00 $ - 121.00$ 284.51$ 426.76$ 569.02$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 105.00 $ 5.00% 82.95 $ - 127.05$ 298.74$ 448.10$ 597.47$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 110.25 $ 5.00% 87.10 $ - 133.40$ 313.67$ 470.51$ 627.34$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 115.76 $ 5.00% 91.45 $ - 140.07$ 210.00$ 314.99$ 419.99$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 77.50$ 60.00$ - 95.00$ 220.50$ 330.74$ 440.99$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 81.38$ 5.00% 63.00$ - 99.75$ 231.52$ 347.28$ 463.04$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 85.44 $ 5.00% 66.15 $ - 104.74$ 243.10$ 364.64$ 486.19$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 89.72 $ 5.00% 69.46 $ - 109.97$ Cost Proposal
9/11/2024
141.93%
Combined Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) %
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
GPA Consulting
City of Hanford On-Call Participation Amount $
for Classifications Only
Not Applicable
OR
General & Admninistrative %

0.00%

0.00%
12%Fee
Fringe Benefit %

CALCULATION INFORMATION
Hourly Range -
Not Applicable
Name/Job Title/Classification¹ Hourly Billing Rates2 Effective Date of Hourly Rate

BILLING INFORMATION
Erinn Silva*
Principal Environmental Planner
Marya Samuelson*
Senior Environmental Planner
Principal
(Environmental Planner, Architectural
Historian, Biologist)
Senior Associate
(Environmental Planner, Architectural
Historian, Biologist)
Prime Consultant
Subconsultant
2nd Tier Subconsultant
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 403 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
150.38$ 225.58$ 300.77$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 55.50 $ 45.00 $ - 66.00$ 157.90$ 236.85$ 315.81$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 58.28$ 5.00% 47.25$ - 69.30$ 165.80$ 248.70$ 331.60$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 61.19 $ 5.00% 49.61 $ - 72.77$ 174.09$ 261.13$ 348.18$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 64.25 $ 5.00% 52.09 $ - 76.40$ 104.32$ 156.48$ 208.64$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 38.50 $ 31.00 $ - 46.00$ 109.54$ 164.30$ 219.07$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 40.43 $ 5.00% 32.55 $ - 48.30$ 115.01$ 172.52$ 230.03$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 42.45 $ 5.00% 34.18 $ - 50.72$ 120.76$ 181.15$ 241.53$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 44.57 $ 5.00% 35.89 $ 53.25 $

86.71$ 130.06$ 173.42$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 32.00$ 26.00$ - 38.00$

91.04$ 136.56$ 182.09$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 33.60$ 5.00% 27.30$ - 39.90$

95.60$ 143.39$ 191.19$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 35.28$ 5.00% 28.67$ - 41.90$ 100.38$ 150.56$ 200.75$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 37.04$ 5.00% 30.10$ - 43.99$

86.71$ 130.06$ 173.42$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 32.00$ 26.00$ - 38.00$

91.04$ 136.56$ 182.09$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 33.60$ 5.00% 27.30$ - 39.90$

95.60$ 143.39$ 191.19$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 35.28$ 5.00% 28.67$ - 41.90$ 100.38$ 150.56$ 200.75$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 37.04$ 5.00% 30.10$ - 43.99$ 100.26$ 150.38$ 200.51$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 37.00$ 31.00$ - 43.00$ 105.27$ 157.90$ 210.54$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 38.85$ 5.00% 32.55$ - 45.15$ 110.53$ 165.80$ 221.06$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 40.79$ 5.00% 34.18$ - 47.41$ 116.06$ 174.09$ 232.12$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 42.83$ 5.00% 35.89$ - 49.78$

86.71$ 130.06$ 173.42$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 32.00$ 26.00$ - 38.00$

91.04$ 136.56$ 182.09$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 33.60$ 5.00% 27.30$ - 39.90$

95.60$ 143.39$ 191.19$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 35.28$ 5.00% 28.67$ - 41.90$ 100.38$ 150.56$ 200.75$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 37.04$ 5.00% 30.10$ - 43.99$

65.03$ 97.55$ 130.06$ 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 24.00$ 21.00$ - 27.00$

68.28$ 102.42$ 136.56$ 7/1/2025 6/30/2026 25.20$ 5.00% 22.05$ - 28.35$

71.70$ 107.54$ 143.39$ 7/1/2026 6/30/2027 26.46$ 5.00% 23.15$ - 29.77$

75.28$ 112.92$ 150.56$ 7/1/2027 6/30/2028 27.78$ 5.00% 24.31$ - 31.26$ NOTES:

3. Billing rate = actual hourly rate * (1+ ICR) * (1+ Fee). Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles for reimbursement.

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. (Add pages as necessary)
Biologist
Project Coordinator
Architectural Historian II
Architectural Historian I
Senior
(Environmental Planner, Architectural
Historian, Biologist, GIS Analyst)
Associate
(Environmental Planner, Architectural
Historian, Biologist, GIS
Analyst/Biologist)
Environmental Planner
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 404 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 9/11/2024
Quantity Unit Unit Cost
NOTES:

At Cost
At Cost
Travel - Meals & Incidentals At Cost
Travel - Lodging, Rental Vehicle, Fuel, Parking, Tolls At Cost Total
Mileage Costs
Project Materials, Equipment Rental and Supplies
Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS (Add additional pages as necessary) GPA Consulting
At Cost
At Cost
City of Hanford On-Call
Reproduction, Printing, Photographic Costs
Travel - Transportation/Commute Fares
Research Fees, Record Searches, Permit Fees
Subconsultants
Subconsultant 1:

Postage, Courier Services, Overnight Mailing
Miscellaneous Costs
At Cost
At Cost
At Cost

1. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

2. Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type.

At Cost
At Cost
At Cost
At Cost
At Cost
At Cost
Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

Subconsultant 2:

Subconsultant 3:

Subconsultant 4:

Subconsultant 5:

3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.

4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

11. Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals.

6. Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of Personnel Administration rules.

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should besupported by mileage logs.

8. If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is its standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehiclesthat could be used for the same purpose.

9. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles.

10. Add additional pages if necessary.

Prime Consultant
Subconsultant
2nd Tier Subconsultant
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 405 of 755 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Title *:

Signature : Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email: Phone Number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Environmental Consulting Services
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. 840 Apollo Street, Suite 312, El Segundo, CA 90245
[email protected] 310-792-2690
9/11/2024
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

11. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration ofEngineering and Design Related Service

12. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Richard Galvin Vice President
Certification of Direct Costs
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

7. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

8. Terms and conditions of the contract

9. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

10. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 406 of 755 ends

HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
(Effective 1/1/26 to 12/31/28)

CLASSIFICATION 2026 RATE 2027 RATE 2028 RATE
Principal Civil Engineer $250/hr $260hr $270/hr
Senior Civil Engineer $230/hr $240/hr $250/hr
Associate Civil Engineer $200/hr $208/hr $216/hr
Staff Engineer $175/hr $182/hr $189/hr
Technician/Inspector $150/hr $156/hr $162/hr
Clerical $100/hr $104/hr $108/hr
Litigation Support $500/hr $520/hr $540/hr

REIMBURSABLES SCHEDULE
(Effective 1/1/26 to 12/31/28)

DESCRIPTION RATE
Mileage Federal Rate
Travel Subsistence Actual Cost + 10%
Postage Actual Cost + 10%
Reproduction Actual Cost + 10%
Subconsultant Actual Cost + 10%
Work requiring an accelerated schedule is subject to a 25% labor surcharge. Peters Engineering Group will furnish monthly billing for work perfo rmed in accordance with previously authorized fees and the above fee schedule. Payments shall be due upon presentation and no later than 30 days from the date of original invoice. Finance charges will apply to unpaid balances.

Page 407 of 755 ends

Page 33 of 34 ends

January 2026
On Call Architecture and Engineering Consultant Services for FEDERAL Projects TRC Engineers, Inc.

City of Hanford
A&E Consultant Agreement

ATTACHMENT “C”
Consultants’ Annual Certification of Indirect Costs
and Financial Management System

Page 408 of 755 ends

Independent Office of Audits and Investigations - Financial Document Review Request Form - Revised 12/2024 1 INSPECTOR GENERAL
Financial Document Review (FDR) Request Form
• To be completed by Local Public Agencies (LPA) - one per contract. • For new proposed Architectural & Engineering (A&E) consultant LPA contracts of $1 million or greater. • For amendments, use only when there are additional subconsultants or changes in Indirect Cost Rate (ICR).

Email to:
[email protected]
California State Department of Transportation
Independent Office of Audits and Investigations
Attention: Financial Document Review Manager
Date:

Federal/State
Project Number:

Check one: New Contract Amendment Other
A&E Contract Number: Total Contract or Amended Amount of:

Prime Consultant Full Legal Name:

Project Description:

List prime consultant and all Safe Harbor Rate (SHR) applicants below. In addition, list all subconsultants with estimated contract costs of $500,000 and above on this contract. Prime consultants must have a CPA audited ICR report and schedule. (Add pages if necessary.) Consultant’s Legal Name Estimated Participation Amount Category CT ID# (if available) I verify we received financial documents from the prime and subconsultants based on the requirements specified in this form’s checklist seen on following page.

Signature:

Name (Print): Title:

Name of Local Agency and Department:

Address:

Phone: Email:

Page 409 of 755 ends

Independent Office of Audits and Investigations - Financial Document Review Request Form - Revised 12/2024 2 CHECKLIST
FDR Requirements for A&E Consultant Indirect Cost Rate
• Requirements for total contract amount equal to or greater than $1,000,000. • Prime and all subconsultant(s) with estimated contract costs of $500,000 and above must provide the documents marked below based on their applicable category.

Instructions
• LPAs are required to complete this form and include all applicable required documents upon submission. • For financial document packages received between July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025, the 2023 or newer ICR must be submitted.
• CT ID#: This is an identification number issued by Caltrans upon review and acceptance of consultant’s ICR(s) schedule for a specific fiscal year. The CT ID# ICR fiscal year end (FYE) must agree with the period when this form and financial documents are submitted as described above. Consultants with a current CT ID# shall include the CT ID# on page 1 of this form and select N/A as the Category; no additional documents are required at
this time.

Please note: Items on this checklist may not be all inclusive. IOAI reserves the right to request additional documents as deemed necessary.

Type of Financial
Documents and
Information for ICR
FYE Proposed by
Consultant
CATEGORY 1:

Cognizant Approval
Letter from an
approved reviewing
agency for ICR FYE
Proposed

CATEGORY
2:

Requesting Safe
Harbor Rate
CATEGORY 3:

CPA Audited ICR
Report
CATEGORY 4:

Participation Amount
of $500K or Greater
and No CPA Report
Certification of Indirect
Costs and Financial
Management System
Form
CPA Audited ICR
Report and Schedule
(Prime Consultant
must have a CPA
Audited ICR
Schedule)
ICR Schedule with
FAR References for
Disallowed Costs (a)
Cognizant Approval
Letter for the ICR FYE
proposed
AASHTO Internal
Control Questionnaire
Appendix B
(a) See Table 8-1 of the AASHTO Audit Guide for a listing of common unallowable costs.

Page 410 of 755 ends

Post-Closing
Trial Balance and
Supplemental
Reconciliation
Schedule (to tie
the proposed ICR
Schedule to the Trial
Balance)
Uncompensated
Overtime Adjustments
Executive
Compensation
Analysis (ECA)
of Eligibility of Contract
Consultant Certification
Safe Harbor Rate:

Management System
Costs and Financial
Independent Office of Audits and Investigations - Financial Document Review Request Form - Revised 12/2024 3 Some or all of the documents listed below may be requested:
• Prior Year ICR Schedule
• Related Party Rent Analysis
• Chart of Accounts
• Income Statement
• Vacation/Sick Policy
• Bonus Policy
• Vehicle, Equipment, and Other Direct Costs Schedules
The following documents can be retrieved from https://oig.dot.ca.gov/resources:
• Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System • AASHTO Internal Control Questionnaire Appendix B
• Safe Harbor Rate – Consultant Certification of Eligibility of Contract Costs and Financial Management System
Type of Financial
Documents and
Information for ICR
FYE Proposed by
Consultant
CATEGORY 1:

Cognizant Approval
Letter from an
approved reviewing
agency for ICR FYE
Proposed
CATEGORY 2:

Requesting Safe
Harbor Rate
CATEGORY 3:

CPA Audited ICR
Report
CATEGORY 4:

Participation Amount
of $500K or Greater
and No CPA Report

Page 411 of 755 ends

Page 412 of 755 ends

Jill Jelley
Digitally signed by Jill Jelley
DN: cn=Jill Jelley gn=Jill Jelley c=US
United States l=US United States o=TRC
Companies, Inc. ou=
[email protected]
Reason: I am approving this document
Location:

Date: 2026-01-09 17:25-05:00

Page 413 of 755 ends

1 Jelley, Jill
From: PANG, MELODY@DOT <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 4:25 PM
To: Abu-Hamid, Linda
Cc: Dagher, Ghassan; Polgar, Robert E@DOT
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: IQON RE: Financial Documents Review on contract 07A6021 | P1410-0564

Hi Linda,
Please note that TRC’s most current acceptance ID# L2025-2010, ICR is 168.14% (H), 138.35% (F), FCCM: 0.41% for FY 7/01/23-6/30/24. Thank you.

Melody Pang
Associate Management Auditor

[email protected] : oig.dot.ca.gov
ph: 916-926-8270

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.

It is solely for the use of
the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication.

From: Abu-Hamid, Linda <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 11:03 AM
To: Polgar, Robert E@DOT <[email protected]>
Cc: Dagher, Ghassan <[email protected]>; PANG, MELODY@DOT <[email protected]>; Magana, Gilbert@DOT <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IQON RE: Financial Documents Review on contract 07A6021 | P1410-0564

EXTERNAL EMAIL. Links/attachments may not be safe.

Hi Robert,

This is an Externa l email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you validate the sender and know the content is safe.

ALWAYS hover over the link to preview the actual URL/site and confirm its legitimacy.

Page 414 of 755 ends

Jill Jelley
Digitally signed by Jill Jelley
DN: cn=Jill Jelley gn=Jill Jelley c=US
United States l=US United States
[email protected]
Reason: I have reviewed this document
Location:

Date: 2025-01-22 13:08-05:00

Page 415 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 1

Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility and Certification of Financial Management System

Consultant Firm Name _____________________________________________________________ Local Agency (if applicable) _______________________________________________________ Contract Number / Federal Project Number ________________________________________ Contract Total $ ___________________________________________________________________ For Subconsultant Firms – estimated % of work to be performed ____________________ % Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate (SHR): Home: 120% and/or Field: 90% Field SHR will be utilized for contracts where the work deliverables are not completed from the consultant offices (i.e. Construction Inspection, Material Testing, Sources Inspection, others).

Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility
I, the undersigned, certify that I am eligible to use the Safe Harbor indirect cost rate as I:

1. Am not a Prime Consultant Firm on a Caltrans contract > $3.5M, or Local Government contract > $1M, regardless of the participation amount.

2. Have not used SHR for more than three (3) years since entering the program on a state or federally funded contract.

AND

1. Do not have relevant contract cost history to use as a base for developing a Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) of Title 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 31 compliant ICR.

2. Do not have a previously accepted ICR by a cognizant agency, or with an audited/accepted actual ICR, and do not have an existing contract with a provisional rate.

Certification of Financial Management System
I, the undersigned, certify that our financial management system in place for this contract and moving forward meets the standards for the Safe Harbor indirect cost rate requirements and financial reporting, accounting records, internal and budget control as set forth in 2 CFR 200, Subpart D. These standards require consulting firms have an accounting system Designlab 252
TBD

Page 416 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 2

adequate to accumulate, and track allowable, allocable, and reasonable direct labor and other direct costs by contract; segregate indirect costs and remove unallowable costs.

Print Name ________________________________________________ Signature ________________________________________________ (Electronic Signature Allowed)
Title ________________________________________________ Date Completed _______________________
Note: The certification of this Safe Harbor Rate was made by, and are the responsibility of, the Company’s management.

Definition of Terms
Direct Cost is any cost that is identified specifically with a particular cost objective. Direct costs are not limited to items that are incorporated in the end products as material or labor.

Costs identified specifically with a contract are direct costs of that contract. All costs identified with other final cost objectives of the contractor are direct costs of those objectives, 48 CFR 31.202.

Indirect or overhead cost is any cost that is not directly identified with a single final cost objective but is identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective, 48 CFR 31. 203.

References
Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 31 -Federal cost principles.

Title 48 CFR Chapter 99, Subchapter B - Procurement Practices and Cost Accounting Standards.

Title is 2 CFR 200 Subpart D, Standards for Financial and Program Management.

Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapter 1, Section 112 - Letting of Contracts.

Title 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide (2016 Edition).

Patrick Boyd
01/09/2026
Principal Landscape Architect

Page 417 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 3

Caltrans Contract
If participating on a Caltrans Contract, also attach a completed copy of the following Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Questionnaire for Evaluating Consultant Firm’s Financial Management System.

Page 418 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 4

Questionnaire for Evaluating Consultant Firm’s Financial Management System
Consultant Firm Name _____________________________________________________________ Firm Headquarters Address _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ Accou
nting Records
• Location where Accounting records are held ________________________ • Name and Title _____________________________________________________ • Email and Phone ____________________________________________________ • Mailing Address _____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________
To be eligible for Safe Harbor indirect cost rate (SHR), the Consultant Firm’s financial management system must be adequate to accumulate and track direct labor and other direct costs by contract, segregate indirect costs, and remove unallowable costs in accordance with 48 CFR 31 for the different business segments.

Instructions

1. Answer all questions and provide an explanation and additional supporting documentation where requested.

2. If additional space is required, please attach a separate sheet and refer to items being answered by number.

Has the Firm developed an indirect cost rate in the past? Yes ____ No ___ If “Yes”, you are NOT ELIGIBLE to use the SHR.

DO NOT CONTINUE with this Questionnaire and please complete the AASHTO Appendix B ICQ and provide an ICR Schedule.

Is the F
irm a Prime Consultant Firm on a Caltrans contract > $3.5M Yes ____ No ___ Or Local Government contract > $1M, regardless of the participation Amount?
If “Yes”, you are NOT ELIGIBLE to use the SHR.

DO NOT CONTINUE with this Questionnaire and please complete the AASHTO Appendix B ICQ and provide an AUDITED ICR Report.

X
X
P.O. Box 27616 Fresno, CA 93729
[email protected] | 559.999.7513
Konni Jones, COO
2530 Sample Ave,
Clovis, CA 93611
1547 E. Pryor Dr. Fresno, CA 93720
Designlab 252

Page 419 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 5

1. What fo
rm of business entity is the Firm?
Sole Proprietorship ___ Partnership ____ C Corporation __ S Corporation __ Other __________________________________________________

2. What ty
pes of services will the Firm provide for this contract? (Select all that apply.) Architectural and Engineering Services ____ Program Management ____ Preliminary Engineering ____ Design Engineering ____ Surveying ____ Feasibility Studies ____
Mapping or Architectural Related Services ____ Other _____________________

3. Does t
he Firm have prior government contracting experience? Yes ____ No ____

4. Does t
he general ledger contain separate direct and indirect accounts for the following? Labor Yes ___ No _____ Non-Labor Yes ____ No ____

5. Does the company have a system in place to identify and remove form the indirect cost pools all unallowable cost? Yes_____ No ____

6. Does t
he firm assign a unique identification/project number in your accounting system for each contract/project?
Yes _____ No _____

7. Is indir
ect and direct labor separated by contract/project/cost objectives on employee timesheets with unique reporting codes?
Yes _____ No _____

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

Page 420 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 6

8. Do you have written policies on the following cost categories? Accounting Yes ___ No ____ Overtime Yes _____ No ____ Billing Yes ___ No ____ Direct/Indirect Expenses Yes _____ No ____ Timesheet Preparation Yes ___ No ____ Prevailing Wage Yes _____ No ____ Bonus Yes ___ No ____

9. What ty
pes of employee status will the Firm provide for this contract? Non-exempt ____ Exempt-salaried ___ Exemp t-hourly ___ Contract Employee ___ Other __________________________________________________

10. Does t
he Firm pay overtime for exempt employees?
Yes _____ No ___

11. Besides labor, does the Firm normally bill/invoice the following as direct contract/project costs? (Select all that apply)
Vehicle _____ Shipping ______
Computer/CADD _____ Lab ______
Pr
inting _____ T ravel ______
Specialty Equipment ____
(Lis
t below)
Other (List below) ______
_________________________________ ______________________________

12. Are mileag
e logs maintained for all vehicles? If no, please explain below.

Explanation _____________________________________________________________________ Where is the vehicle stored after work? ___________________________________________ Does employee use vehicle for personal use? Yes ______________________ No_______ What is the recovery/billing rate used for Firm or personal vehicle mileage reimbursement?
$ ________ per mile
Designlab 252 owns no vehicles. Mileage is tracked only when used for allowable contract work.

NA
.55
na
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

Page 421 of 755 ends

California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 7

I cert
ify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the responses to this questionnaire are accurate.

Print Na
me ________________________________________________
Signature ________________________________________________ (Electronic Signature Allowed)
Title ________________________________________________ Date Completed _______________________
Note: The certification of this Safe Harbor Rate was made by, and are the responsibility of, the Company’s management.

Patrick Boyd
Principal Landscape Architect
01/09/2026

Page 422 of 755 ends

mail p. o. box 27616 | fresno, ca 93729 | studio: 559.472.9966 | facsimile 559.472.9969 | web designlab252.com

September 4, 2024

Mr. Mark Imbriani, PE
Vice President/Project Manager
TRC
10680 White Rock Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

RE: City of Hanford A&E Consultant Services RFQ

Mr. Imbriani:

Designlab 252 does not do work subject to prevailing wage and is not subject to prevailing wage requirements under the State of California regulations and therefore is registered with the DIR.

Thank you.

Scott Mears
President

p: 559.999.4397
e: [email protected]

Page 423 of 755 ends

Page 424 of 755 ends