Hermosa Beach City Council
March 31, 2022

1212
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Sidewalk Pathway
Address Street Uplift (in) Width (ft) Type Clearance (ft) Insp.

Date
Obstructions
Picture Comments
Location Sidewalk
D46 1017 5th St. 1" 3/18/2015
D47 501 5th St. 1" 3/18/2015
D48 923 6th St. Power Pole 2'9" 3/18/2015
D49 932 6th St. Power Pole 2'7" 3/18/2015D50 1039 6th St. Power Pole 2'8" 3/18/2015 D51 605 6th St. Power Pole 2'8" 3/18/2015
D52 Gently Ave. (6th St. to #518) 2'6" Narrow Sidewalk 3/18/2015 D53 1114 6th St. Sign Post 2' 3/18/2015
D54 244 Prospect Power Pole 2'5" # 244 on Mussey Ave. side 3/18/2015 D55 844 13th St. Power Pole 2'1" 3/20/2015
D56 844 13th St. 1" 3/20/2015
D57 844 13th St. 1" Across # 825, Tree root 3/20/2015
D58 1004 Ocean Dr./14th St. SE 2" # 1004 on 14th St. 3/20/2015 D59 Bonnie Brae St. (# 1204 to Aviation Blvd.) 3'2" Narrow Sidewalk 3/20/2015 D60 1217 Owosso Ave. 1.5" 3/20/2015
D61 1326 Owosso Ave. Power Pole 2'5" 3/20/2015
D62 1326 Owosso Ave. /14th St. Hydrant 2'6" # 1326 on 14th St. 3/20/2015 D63 Prospect Ave.(14th St. NW to # 1415) 3'7" 3/20/2015 D64 1530 Bonnie Brae St. 2'2" Across # 1530 3/20/2015
D65 Prospect Ave. (Campana St. NW to 1719) 3'7" 3/25/2015 D66 1625 Prospect Ave. 1" 3/25/2015
D67 Prospect Ave. (18th St. NW to 1813) 3'6" 3/25/2015
D68 Prospect Ave. (1831 to 1865) 3'6" 3/25/2015
D69 1905 Prospect Ave. 3'6" 3/25/2015
D70 Prospect Ave. (2011 to 21st St.) 3'6" 3/25/2015
D71 Prospect Ave./21st St. NW Stop Sign Post 2'10" 3/25/2015 D72 PCH/Artesia Blvd. SE Traffic Control Cabinet 2'10" 3/25/2015D73 PCH/21st St. SE Pedestrian Push Button 2'3" On PCH 3/25/2015 D74 PCH/21st St. SE Power Pole 2'3" On PCH 3/25/2015
D75 1830 PCH Power Pole 1'8" 3/25/2015
D76 1734 PCH/18th St. SE Power Pole 2'0" On PCH 3/25/2015 D77 1706 PCH Power Pole 2'4" 3/25/2015
D78 949 16th St. 2'10" 3/25/2015
D79 1019 16th St. Hydrant 1'8" 3/25/2015
D80 950 17th St. Planter 2'9" 3/25/2015
D81 927 17th St. Power Pole 1'9" 3/25/2015
D82 911 17th St. Power Pole 2'10" 3/25/2015
D83 1857 Hillcrest Ave. Power Pole 2'2" 3/25/2015
D84 2005 Hillcrest Ave. Power Pole/Hydrant/Sign Post 1'5" 3/25/2015 D85 2017 Hillcrest Ave. Bumpy Sidewalk 3/25/2015D86 1026 21st St. Power Pole 2'10" 3/25/2015 D87 2104 21st St. 2" 3/25/2015
D88 2104 Hillcrest Ave. / 21st St. NE Tree 2'3" On 21st St. 3/25/2015 D89 2105 Hillcrest Ave. 2" Tree 2'6" 3/25/2015

1213
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Sidewalk Pathway
Address Street Uplift (in) Width (ft) Type Clearance (ft) Insp.

Date
Obstructions
Picture Comments
Location Sidewalk
D90 936 Hillcrest Ave. Tree/Light Pole 2'7" 3/25/2015
D91 936 Hillcrest Ave. Tree 2'0" 3/25/2015
D92 2220 24th St. Light Pole 2'6" 3/25/2015
D93 933 25th St. Tree 2'0" 3/25/2015
D94 925 26th St. Light Pole 2'0" 3/25/2015D95 920 27th St. 3" Tree 2'0" 3/25/2015D96 904 28th St. Tree 1'10" 3/25/2015 D97 904 24th St. Tree/Light Pole 2'0" 3/25/2015
D98 925 21st St. Tree 1'9" 3/25/2015D99 909 21st St. Tree 2'0" 3/25/2015 D100 901 21st St. Tree 2'0" 3/25/2015D101 850 21st St. Tree 2'0" 3/25/2015D102 Alley/21st St. NW Power Pole 2'10" # 2040 on the Intersection 3/25/2015 D103 PCH/21st St. SE Pedestrian Push Button 2'0" 3/25/2015D104 805 Rhodes St. 3 Trees 2'0" 3/25/2015 D105 849 Rhodes St. 4 Trees 2'6" 3/25/2015D106 1111 Prospect Ave. 1" 3/27/2015 D107 1734A Prospect Ave. 1" 3/27/2015
D108 2204 Prospect Ave. Sign Post 2'7" 3/27/2015
D109 Prospect Ave. / 24th St. Sign Post/Power Pole 2'6" 3/27/2015 D110 1231 Artesia Blvd. Light Pole 2'8" 3/27/2015
D111 1231 Artesia Blvd. Light Pole 2'9" 3/27/2015D112 1231 Artesia Blvd. Sign Post 2'1" 3/27/2015D113 Artesia Blvd. / Meadows Ave. Pedestrian Push Button 2'1" 3/27/2015 D114 Artesia Blvd. / Meadows Ave. NE Traffic Light 1'8" 3/27/2015D115 1256 24th St. 1.5" Tree roots 3/27/2015 D116 1231 24th St. 1.5" 3/27/2015
D117 1231 24th St. 1" 3/27/2015D118 2404 24th St. Power Pole 1'11" 3/27/2015D119 1225 21st St. 1.5" 3/27/2015D120 1240 21st St. 1" Tree roots 3/27/2015 D121 Harper Ave. / 20th Pl. NW Power Pole 2'8" 3/27/2015 D122 1217 20th St. Power Pole 2'2" 3/27/2015
D123 1227 19th St. Power Pole 2'0" 3/27/2015D124 19th St. / Sea View Park 1" 3/27/2015 D125 17th St. / Golden Ave SE Power Pole 2'6" 3/27/2015D126 17th St. / Golden Ave SE Hydrant 1'8" 3/27/2015 D127 1620 Golden Ave. Power Pole 2'3" 3/27/2015
D128 1508 Silver St. Power Pole 2'8" 3/27/2015D129 1235 14th St. Power Pole 2'0" 3/27/2015 D130 1232 14th St. Power Pole 1'5" 3/27/2015D131 601 Ardmore Ave. 1" 3/31/2015 D132 600 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 2'3" 3/31/2015
D133 Ardmore Ave. / 10th St. SE Hydrant 1'5" 3/31/2015
D134 1040 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 1'7" 3/31/2015

1214
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Sidewalk Pathway
Address Street Uplift (in) Width (ft) Type Clearance (ft) Insp.

Date
Obstructions
Picture Comments
Location Sidewalk
D135 2461 PCH / Pier Ave. Traffic Control Cabinet 2'7" On PCH 3/31/2015 D136 PCH / 11th Pl. SW 1" 3/31/2015
D137 1131 PCH / 11th Pl. SW 2" # 1131 on PCH across gas station 3/31/2015 D138 1107 PCH / #1107 (Mc Donald's) 1" 3/31/2015
D139 651,653 11th St. Power Pole 2'4" 3/31/2015
D140 10th St. Guy Wires 2'11" 3/31/2015
D141 PCH / 10th St. NW Traffic Control Cabinet 2'10" 3/31/2015 D142 PCH / 10th St. SW Sign Post 2'3" 3/31/2015D143 931 PCH / 10th St. 1" 3/31/2015 D144 Ardmore Ave. / 8th Pl. NE Power Pole 2'0" 3/31/2015 D145 601 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 2'4" 3/31/2015
D146 712 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 2'3" 3/31/2015D147 Ardmore Ave. / 7th St. NE Hydrant 1'11" 3/31/2015 D148 Ardmore Ave. / 7th St. SE Power Pole 2'5" 3/31/2015 D149 Ardmore Ave. / 6th St. NE Hydrant 2'8" 3/31/2015
D150 Ardmore Ave. / 6th St. SE Power Pole/Guy Wires/Sign Post 2'0" 3/31/2015D151 618 6th St. 2" 3/31/2015 D152 624 7th St. 1" 3/31/2015D153 632,642 7th St. Sidewalk Blocked 3/31/2015 D154 642 7th St. Sidewalk Blocked 3/31/2015
D155 501 2nd St. Guy Wires 2'6" 3/31/2015
D156 22 Hill St. 1" 3/31/2015
D157 Herondo St. / Valley Dr. NW Hydrant 2'8" 3/31/2015 D158 415 Valley Dr. Street Light 2'0" 3/31/2015
D159 415 Valley Dr. Hydrant 2'7" 3/31/2015
D160 239 Valley Dr. 1" 3/31/2015
D161 Valley Dr. / Sout Park NW 1" 3/31/2015
D162 Valley Dr. / 6th St. NW Pedestrian Push Button 2'2" # 603 On Valley Dr. 3/31/2015 D163 Valley Dr. / 8th St. NW Power Pole / Guy Wires 2'8" 3/31/2015D164 Valley Dr. / 8th St. SW Hydrant 1'8" 3/31/2015D165 Cypress Ave. / 6th St. SE Power Pole 2'7" 4/1/2015D166 Cypress Ave. / 6th St. SW Stop Sign Post 2'8" 4/1/2015 D167 Cypress Ave. / 6th St. SW Power Pole / Guy Wires 2'4" 4/1/2015 D168 606 Cypress Ave. Sidewalk Blocked 4/1/2015
D169 Sunset Dr. / 6th St. NW Hydrant 2'2" 4/1/2015
D170 Bay View Dr. / 6th St. Hydrant 2'6" 4/1/2015D171 34 Hermosa Ave. 1" 4/1/2015 D172 Monterey Blvd. / 1st St. NW 2" # 101 on Monterey Blvd. 4/1/2015 D173 148 Monterey Blvd. 1" 4/1/2015
D174 241 Monterey Blvd. 3" 4/1/2015D175 Bay View Dr. / 4th St. NE Electrical Cabinet 2'5" On 4th St. 4/1/2015 D176 439 2nd St. 1" On 2nd St. 4/1/2015
D177 211 2nd St. 2" On 2nd St. 4/1/2015D178 Bard St. / Police Dep. Sidewalk Blocked 4/2/2015 D179 Bard St. / City Hall Sidewalk Blocked 4/2/2015

1215
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Sidewalk Pathway
Address Street Uplift (in) Width (ft) Type Clearance (ft) Insp.

Date
Obstructions
Picture Comments
Location Sidewalk
D180 1028 Loma Dr. Street Light 1'10" 4/2/2015
D181 432 11th St. 1" 4/2/2015
D182 Cypress Ave. / 11th St. NW Stop Sign Post 2'10" 4/2/2015 D183 1105 Cypress Ave. Guy Wires 2'10" 4/2/2015
D184 1158 Cypress Ave. Hydrant 2'0" 4/2/2015
D185 518 11th St. 2" 4/2/2015
D186 650 Cypress Ave. Power pole 2'10" 4/2/2015
D187 Cypress Ave. Power pole 2'1" Across # 650 4/2/2015 D188 1010 Monterey Blvd. 1" 4/2/2015
D189 974 Monterey Blvd. 1" 4/2/2015
D190 620 Monterey Blvd. 2" 4/2/2015D191 2491 Valley Dr. / 25th St. 1" 4/3/2015 D192 2481 Valley Dr. 2.5" 4/3/2015
D193 2431 Valley Dr. 1" 4/3/2015
D194 Valley Dr. / 24th St. SW Hydrant 2'0" 4/3/2015
D195 1973 Valley Dr. 1" 4/3/2015
D196 1925 Valley Dr. 0.5" 4/3/2015
D197 43 Valley Dr. / Hermosa Valley School 0.5" 4/3/2015 D198 1636 Monterey Blvd. 1" 4/3/2015
D199 1964 Monterey Blvd. 1" 4/3/2015D200 Park Ave. / 24th St. SW Power Pole / Guy Wires 2'4" On 24th St. 4/3/2015 D201 1781 Valley Park Ave. 1" 4/3/2015
D202 1769 Valley Park Ave. 1" 4/3/2015D203 1754 Valley Park Ave. 1.5" 4/3/2015D204 1737 Valley Park Ave. 1" 4/3/2015D205 527 25th St. 1" 4/3/2015 D206 523 25th St. 1" 4/3/2015D207 486 25th St. 0.5" 4/3/2015 D208 486 25th St. 1" 4/3/2015
D209 484 25th St. 1" 4/3/2015D210 Morningside Dr. (25th St. to End of Morningside Dr.) 2'6" 4/3/2015 D211 1901 19th St. Sidewalk Cracked 4/6/2015
D212 1533 Manhatan Ave. 1" 4/6/2015
D213 1900 19th St. 1" 4/6/2015D214 321 24th St. 1" 4/7/2015 D215 Manhatan Ave. / 25th St. SE 1" 4/7/2015
D216 105 Manhatan Ave. 1" 4/7/2015
D217 Palm Dr. / Longfellow Ave. NE Hydrant 2'9" 4/8/2015 D218 399 27th St. Power Pole 2'5" 4/8/2015
D219 329 27th St. Power Pole 1'10" 4/8/2015D220 257 27th St. Power Pole 2'8" 4/8/2015D221 Manhatan Ave. / 27th St. NE Stop Sign Post 2'4" 4/8/2015 D222 Ingleside Dr. / 33rd Pl. SW Hydrant 1'4" 4/9/2015
D223 455 Longfellow Ave. Power Pole 2'4" 4/9/2015
D224 455 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/9/2015

1216
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Sidewalk Pathway
Address Street Uplift (in) Width (ft) Type Clearance (ft) Insp.

Date
Obstructions
Picture Comments
Location Sidewalk
D225 455 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/9/2015
D226 441 Longfellow Ave. Power Pole 2'8" 4/9/2015
D227 411 Longfellow Ave. 1" Sidewalk Damaged 4/9/2015D228 Valley Dr. / 31st St. NW Power Pole / Hydrant 2'2" 4/9/2015 D229 519 Valley Dr. Planter 1'11" 4/9/2015
D230 519 Valley Dr. Hydrant / Stop Sign Post 2'3" 4/9/2015 D231 Ingleside Dr. / 29th St. NW Power Pole 2'3" 4/9/2015 D232 Ardmore Ave. / Porter Ln. NE Hydrant 2'6" 4/9/2015 D233 2524 Ardmore Ave. Hydrant 2'8" 4/9/2015
D234 Ardmore Ave. / 300' N/O Gould Ave Stop Sign Post 2'3" On Ardmore Ave. 4/9/2015 D235 Ardmore Ave. / 30th St. SE Street Light 2'0" 4/9/2015 D236 605 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/10/2015
D237 611 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/10/2015D238 613 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/10/2015D239 621 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/10/2015D240 637 Longfellow Ave. 1" 4/10/2015D241 702 Longfellow Ave. / Tennyson Pl. SE 1" 4/10/2015 D242 734 Longfellow Ave. / Tennyson Pl. SE 1" 4/10/2015D243 PCH (Longfellow Ave. to 30th St.) Sidewalk Damaged 4/10/2015 D244 739 30th St. 2" 4/10/2015
D245 Braeholm Pl. / 30th St. SW Hydrant 2'2" 4/10/2015
D246 2919 Hermosa View Dr. Hydrant 2'5" 4/10/2015
D247 PCH / 24th St. SW Hydrant 2'0" 4/10/2015
D248 PCH / 24th St. NW 1" 4/10/2015
D249 PCH / 24th St. NW Power Pole 2'7" 4/10/2015D250 PCH / 21st St. NW Traffic Light 2'5" On PCH 4/10/2015 D251 PCH / 21st St. NW Traffic Signal Cabinet 1'8" On 21st St. 4/10/2015 D252 1837 PCH 2" 4/10/2015
D253 1821 PCH 2" 4/10/2015D254 1821 PCH 1" 4/10/2015D255 715 16th St. SW Hydrant 2'0" 4/10/2015 D256 Ardmore Ave. / 16th St. SE Power Pole 2'7" 4/10/2015 D257 Ardmore Ave. / 16th St. SE Hydrant 2'7" 4/10/2015
D258 1820 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 2'3" 4/10/2015
D259 2026 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 2'0" 4/10/2015D260 601 Ardmore Ave. / 21st St. NW Power Pole 2'5" 4/10/2015 D261 1910 Ava St. Power Pole 2'0" 4/10/2015
D262 Springfield Ave. / 21st St. SE Stop Sign Post 2'3" 4/10/2015 D263 Ardmore Ave. / 21st St. NE Power Pole 2'3" 4/10/2015 D264 2126 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 2'3" 4/10/2015
D265 Ardmore Ave. / 25th St. NE Power Pole 2'2" 4/10/2015 D266 2506 Ardmore Ave. Power Pole 1'10" 4/10/2015
D267 Hermosa Ave. / 16th St. SW Street Light 2'10" 4/10/2015 D268 Ardmore Ave/ Gould Terr. Stairs with no ramp access Provide 48" min. wide ramp access 4/9/2015 D269 Hermosa Ave. / 34th Pl. W Planter on 34th Pl. 4/10/2015

1217
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Sidewalk Pathway
Address Street Uplift (in) Width (ft) Type Clearance (ft) Insp.

Date
Obstructions
Picture Comments
Location Sidewalk
D270 Hermosa Ave. / 35th St. W Stairs on 35th St. 4/10/2015 D271 The Strand / 34th Pl. E Planter on 34th Pl. 4/10/2015 D272 The Strand / Longfellow Ave. E 4/10/2015
D273 The Strand / 30th Pl. E Stairs on 30th Pl. 4/10/2015 D274 740 24th St. Steep Grade Break 54% 4/10/2015
D275 Hermosa Ave. / Longfellow Ave. Speed bumps in pathway Remove speed bumps, missing ramp atcrosswalk, provide truncated domes 4/10/2015

1218
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome R1 Prospect Ave 1st St SW 11.3 9.0 9.2 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/16/2015 R2 Prospect Ave 1st St NW 6.6 9.3 11.5 N/C (L < 4') N N Ramp Cracks 3/16/2015 R3 Barney Ct 1st St NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/16/2015 R4 Prospect Ave 1st Pl SW 10.6 8.2 9.0 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R5 Prospect Ave 1st Pl NW Curb 4.4 N N Ramp W=3' 3/16/2015 R6 Barney Ct 1st Pl SE N No Ramp 3/16/2015R7 Barney Ct 1st St NW 3.8 6.5 2.1 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R8 Barney Ct 1st St SW 16.7 3.7 3.6 0.4 N N Power Poles/Guy Wires <3" Sidewalk Clearance 3/16/2015 R9 Meyer Ct 1st St NE 6.2 8.3 7.3 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015
R10 Meyer Ct 1st St NW 0.6 5.0 6.8 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015R11 Meyer Ct 1st St SW 0.8 Curb N/C N N Non‐compliant landing N‐S Direction 3/16/2015 R12 Meyer Ct 1st St SE 11.1 10.8 10.9 N/C N N Non‐compliant landing N‐S Direction 3/16/2015 R13 PCH 1st St NE 10.2 9.5 3.0 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015
R14 PCH 1st St SE 6.9 9.9 12.2 2.0 N N 3/16/2015
R15 PCH 2nd St SE 7.3 0.0 1.2 Y Y Off‐set Crosswalk/not in line with the Ramp 3/16/2015 R16 PCH 2nd St NE 5.8 0.4 6.3 Y Y 3/16/2015
R17 PCH 2nd St SW 6.0 0.9 6.0 0.1 Y Y 3/16/2015
R18 PCH 1st Pl NW 12.5 8.9 12.3 1.8 N N 3/16/2015R19 PCH 1st Pl SW 15.5 16.8 20.8 N/C N N No landing 3/16/2015 R20 PCH 1st St NW 17.1 14.2 8.4 2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/16/2015 R21 PCH 1st St SW 5.3 8.2 17.0 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015
R22 Ardmore Ave 1st St SE 11.7 7.0 10.6 >2.0 N N 1/2" Lip 3/16/2015 R23 Ardmore Ave 1st St NE 12.9 7.7 9.0 >2.0 N N 1/2" Lip 3/16/2015 R24 Ardmore Ave 1st Pl SE 13.3 7.8 6.7 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/16/2015 R25 Ardmore Ave 1st Pl NE 14.2 11.6 12.5 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R26 Ardmore Ave 2nd St SE 8.8 2.3 6.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R27 Ardmore Ave 2nd St SW 11.7 13.5 5.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R28 Ardmore Ave 2nd St NW 3.5 6.1 1.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R29 Ardmore Ave 2nd St NE 12.5 12.0 10.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R30 Ardmore Ave 3rd St SE 14.4 11.7 7.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R31 Ardmore Ave 3rd St NE 8.5 7.1 11.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R32 Ardmore Ave 3rd St NW 14.3 10.5 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R33 Ardmore Ave 3rd St SW 15.8 8.7 10.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R34 Ardmore Ave 4th St NW 13.8 13.6 12.7 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R35 Ardmore Ave 4th St SW 14.2 15.0 17.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R36 Ardmore Ave 4th St SE 12.8 9.5 8.6 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/16/2015 R37 Ardmore Ave 4th St NW 12.1 13.8 12.9 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing E‐W Direction 3/16/2015 R38 Ardmore Ave 5th St SE 7.1 6.9 5.5 N/C (L < 4') Y N 3/16/2015 R39 Ardmore Ave 5th St NE 5.3 6.2 8.8 0.9 Y Y 3/16/2015 R40 Ardmore Ave 5th St SW 3.5 1.1 5.5 Y Y 3/16/2015
R41 PCH 5th St NW 6.1 4.5 3.1 2.0 Y Y 3/16/2015R42 PCH 5th St SW 9.4 9.0 10.8 N/C Y N No Landing, Manhole over Dome 3/16/2015 R43 PCH (429) 5th St SW‐2 10.0 12.0 19.7 >2.0 Y N S/O SW Signal located in front of #429 PCH 3/16/2015 R44 PCH 5th St SE 10.1 11.6 5.8 >2.0 Y N 3/16/2015
R45 PCH 5th St NE 8.6 9.2 10.1 >2.0 Y N 3/16/2015R46 422 PCH 7.5 0.5 7.4 Y Y 3/16/2015R47 PCH 4th St NE 12.5 7.8 5.0 N/C N N 1/2" Lip, No Landing 3/16/2015 R48 PCH 4th St SE 12.8 9.9 14.1 N/C N N 1/4" Lip, No landing 3/16/2015 Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant

1219
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R49 PCH 3rd St SE 8.0 1.0 8.5 Y N Right flare (Ramp) >8.33% / On PCH 3/16/2015 R50 PCH 3rd St SW 9.7 2.8 6.5 Y N 3/16/2015
R51 PCH 3rd St NW 11.7 2.3 14.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R52 PCH 2nd St NW 6.5 6.3 7.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R53 PCH 2nd St SW 10.8 7.1 13.3 0.5 N N 3/16/2015
R54 125 PCH N No Ramp, Off‐set Crosswalk to Driveway 3/16/2015 R55 Prospect Ave 2nd St SW 8.5 11.0 10.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R56 Prospect Ave 2nd St NW 13.9 14.0 7.4 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R57 Prospect Ave Van Horne Ln NE N No Ramp; City Limit 3/16/2015 R58 Prospect Ave 3rd St SW 11.8 Curb >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R59 Prospect Ave 3rd St NW 23.2 9.8 12.3 N N Ramp Entry W=3' 3/16/2015R60 Prospect Ave Massey St SE 9.5 21.3 13.4 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/16/2015R61 Prospect Ave Massey St NE 5.5 13.7 15.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R62 Prospect Ave Hollowell Ave SE 4.6 15.8 16.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R63 Prospect Ave Hollowell Ave NE 8.9 14.0 12.0 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R64 Prospect Ave Hollowell Ave SW 18.9 19.4 21.1 2.0 N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R65 Prospect Ave Hollowell Ave NW 15.4 13.8 12.4 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R66 Prospect Ave Gentry St SE 12.5 15.7 13.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R67 Prospect Ave Gentry St SW 26.2 21.0 18.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R68 Prospect Ave Gentry St NW 20.8 15.0 17.7 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R69 Prospect Ave Gentry St NE 7.6 11.3 17.7 N/C N N No Landing, East (Right) Power Pole 2' 5" Clearnace West (Left) Power Pole 3' 8" Clearance 3/16/2015 R70 Prospect Ave 4th St SW 14.0 6.7 1.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R71 Prospect Ave 4th St NW 7.2 10.9 7.7 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R72 Prospect Ave 5th St SW 9.2 Curb >2.0 N N 3/16/2015
R73 Prospect Ave 5th St NW 5.6 5.3 19.8 N/C N N Landing non‐compliant N‐S Direction 3/16/2015 R74 Prospect Ave 6th St SE 15.3 12.9 9.8 0.1 N N 3/16/2015 R75 Prospect Ave 6th St NE 9.0 8.8 16.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R76 535 Prospect Ave N N No Ramps on both sides of Crosswalk 3/16/2015 R77 Prospect Ave 6th St SW 5.8 0.8 1.9 0.8 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/16/2015R78 Prospect Ave 6th St NW 3.9 4.5 4.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R79 Prospect Ave 7th Pl SE 6.9 8.8 7.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R80 Prospect Ave 7th Pl NE 0.4 6.5 6.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R81 Prospect Ave 7th St SW 4.4 8.3 5.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R82 Prospect Ave 7th St NW 4.1 9.7 10.2 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing E‐W Direction 3/16/2015 R83 Prospect Ave 7th St SE 4.8 8.4 3.3 N/C N N No Landing, Powerpole 2' 10" Clearance 3/16/2015 R84 Prospect Ave 7th St NE 3.4 14.9 6.3 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing E‐W Direction 3/16/2015 R85 Prospect Ave 8th St SW 15.0 10.0 14.0 N N 3/16/2015 R86 Prospect Ave 8th St NW 16.7 N/c N N Non‐compliant Landing E‐W Direction 3/16/2015 R87 Prospect Ave 8th St SE 7.8 8.2 4.7 2.0 Y Y 3/16/2015 R88 Prospect Ave 8th St NE 25.7 18.8 9.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R89 Prospect Ave 8th Pl SW 9.4 14.9 16.9 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R90 Prospect Ave 8th Pl NW 20.6 12.8 15.5 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R91 Prospect Ave 9th St SW 18.2 17.3 24.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R92 854 Prospect Ave N No Ramps on both sides of Crosswalk 3/16/2015 R93 Prospect Ave 9th St SE 11.1 12.1 Curb N/C N N Non‐compliant landing N‐S Direction 3/16/2015 R94 Prospect Ave 9th St NE 21.5 12.9 12.8 N/C N N Non‐compliant landing W‐E Direction 3/16/2015 R95 905 Prospect Ave N No Ramps on both sides of Crosswalk 3/16/2015

1220
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R96 Prospect Ave 9th St NW 18.8 19.4 22.0 >2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R97 Prospect Ave 10th St SW 23.5 7.9 13.6 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/16/2015 R98 Prospect Ave 10th St NW N No Ramp, leads to Driveway 3/16/2015 R99 Prospect Ave 10th St SE 19.3 11.8 5.1 N/C N No Landing 3/16/2015 R100 Prospect Ave 10th St NE 7.2 1.8 Curb N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/16/2015 R101 Prospect Ave 11th St SE 22.6 12.0 13.1 N N 3/16/2015 R102 Prospect Ave 11th St NE 16.1 14.8 26.0 >2.0 N N Sidewalk Landing; Sign Post 3' 3" Clearance 3/16/2015 R103 Prospect Ave Aviation Blvd SW 18.7 7.8 2.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015R104 Prospect Ave Aviation Blvd SE 8.3 11.4 6.9 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/16/2015 R105 Prospect Ave 11th Pl NE 7.6 12.9 22.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/16/2015 R106 Prospect Ave 11th Pl SE 9.2 9.2 9.0 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/16/2015 R107 Harper Ave 11th Pl NW 15.1 7.2 8.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/16/2015 R108 Harper Ave 11th Pl SE N No Ramp, asphalt transition, no Sidewalk 3/16/2015 R109 Reynolds Ln 7th Pl SW Curb 3.6 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/16/2015 R110 Reynolds Ln 6th St NW 13.6 11.0 Curb 2.0 N N 3/16/2015 R111 Reynolds Ln 6th St SW Curb 10.3 6.7 2.0 N N 3/16/2015R112 Reynolds Ln 5th St NW N No Ramp 3/16/2015 R113 Reynolds Ln 5th St SW N No Ramp 3/16/2015
R114 Ocean Dr 8th St SW 0.4 10.4 21.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R115 Ocean Dr 8th St NW 17.2 19.4 18.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R116 Ocean Dr 8th Pl NE 10.2 14.7 17.6 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/18/2015R117 Ocean Dr 8th Pl NW 3.0 8.4 13.6 2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R118 Ocean Dr 8th Pl SW 10.9 7.3 6.4 2.0 N N 3/18/2015
R119 Ocean Dr 8th Pl SE 17.2 14.6 14.2 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R120 Ocean Dr 9th St SW 11.6 7.9 10.0 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R121 Ocean Dr 9th St SE 13.9 13.3 10.2 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R122 Ocean Dr 9th St NE 4.1 9.1 13.4 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R123 Ocean Dr 9th St NW 9.7 7.6 4.9 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015R124 Owosso Ave 9th St NW 9.7 11.4 8.4 >2.0 N N Steep Grade Break/Lift at Sidewalk 3/18/2015 R125 Owosso Ave 9th St NE 18.8 14.4 17.4 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R126 Owosso Ave 10th St NE 9.0 13.7 20.3 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R127 Owosso Ave 10th St NW 3.8 8.3 11.2 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R128 Owosso Ave 10th St SW 18.9 12.0 3.0 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R129 Owosso Ave 10th St SE 27.0 20.3 20.5 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R130 Ocean Dr 10th St NE 8.4 8.9 12.1 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015R131 Ocean Dr 10th St NW 2.3 3.0 7.6 2.0 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/18/2015 R132 Ocean Dr 10th St SW 11.1 11.1 13.3 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R133 Ocean Dr 10th St SE 13.4 13.5 15.8 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015R134 Ocean Dr Aviation Blvd SW 18.0 7.6 5.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R135 Ocean Dr Aviation Blvd SE 9.3 9.6 15.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R136 Owosso Ave Aviation Blvd SW 18.0 7.6 5.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R137 Owosso Ave Aviation Blvd SE 9.3 9.6 15.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R138 Hollowell Ave 7th Pl SW 10.2 9.1 6.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R139 Hollowell Ave 7th Pl SE 8.7 13.0 11.2 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R140 Gentry St. 3rd St. NW N No Ramp 3/18/2015
R141 Gentry St. 3rd St. NE 12.6 11.3 20.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R142 Hollowell Ave. 3rd St. NW N No Ramp 3/18/2015
R143 Hollowell Ave. 3rd St. NE 11.7 9.6 17.3 N/C Y N No Landing 3/18/2015

1221
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R144 Hollowell Ave. 3rd St. SW 11.4 7.8 2.1 N/C N N No Landing, Manhole on Ramp 3/18/2015 R145 Hollowell Ave. 3rd St. SE 20.7 14.0 16.2 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R146 Hollowell Ave. 2nd St. NE 33.4 15.6 36.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R147 Hollowell Ave. 2nd St. NW 2.9 4.4 15.7 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R148 Hopkins St. 4th St. NE 15.4 8.2 17.3 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/18/2015 R149 Hopkins St. 4th St. SE 9.6 9.5 11.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R150 Hopkins St. 5th St. SW 5.7 8.4 6.6 1.8 N N 3/18/2015 R151 Hopkins St. 5th St. SE 15.8 10.5 21.0 N/C N N Non‐compliant landing N‐S Direction 3/18/2015 R152 Pine St. 5th St. NE Curb 13.2 13.7 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R153 Pine St. 5th St. NW 11.1 11.0 14.3 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R154 Ocean ViewAve. 5th St. SW 8.2 7.2 7.8 2.0 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/18/2015 R155 Ocean ViewAve. 5th St. SE 13.9 11.5 11.4 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R156 Ocean ViewAve. 4th St. NW 9.3 13.0 14.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/18/2015 R157 Ocean ViewAve. 4th St. SW 21.5 12.1 19.2 N/C N N No Landing, Manhole on Ramp 3/18/2015R158 Alley 4th St. (# 818) NW/SW N No Ramps on both sides of Crosswalk 3/18/2015R159 Alley 5th St. NW 1.0 0.2 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/18/2015R160 Alley 5th St. SW 14.7 N N 3/18/2015 R161 PCH 6th St. SE 10.6 7.5 9.6 N/C Y N No Landing 3/18/2015 R162 PCH 6th St. NE 7.0 9.9 10.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R163 PCH 7th St. SE 12.1 8.0 11.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/18/2015 R164 PCH 7th St. NE 10.0 12.5 12.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/18/2015R165 PCH 8th St. SE Curb 9.4 6.6 >2.0 N N 3/18/2015 R166 PCH 8th St. NE 7.7 13.0 14.2 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R167 PCH 8th Pl. SE 9.5 7.3 10.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R168 PCH 8th Pl. NE 7.6 9.2 11.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R169 PCH 9th St. SE 9.2 4.2 4.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R170 PCH 9th St. NE 12.1 16.3 19.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R171 PCH 10th St. SE 16.1 6.4 7.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R172 PCH 10th St. NE 7.4 6.2 12.8 N N 3/18/2015
R173 PCH 10th St. (corner) NE 9.5 12.9 6.7 N N 3/18/2015 R174 Aviation Blvd. 10th St. (intersection) SE N N Median SW, W=3'10"<4'2" (Caltrans std) 3/18/2015 R175 Aviation Blvd. 10th St. (intersection) NE Y N Median SW, W=3'10"<4'2" (Caltrans std) 3/18/2015R176 Aviation Blvd. 10th St. (corner) NW N No Ramp at crosswalk 3/18/2015 R177 PCH 10th St. NW 21.1 N N 3/18/2015
R178 PCH 10th St. SW 14.0 N N 3/18/2015R179 PCH 9th St. NW 9.4 8.2 9.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R180 PCH 9th St. SW 7.5 7.6 9.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R181 PCH 8th Pl. NW 10.4 9.0 10.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/18/2015 R182 PCH 8th Pl. SW 9.6 6.9 8.4 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R183 PCH 8th St. NW 14.3 17.4 12.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R184 PCH 8th St. SW 5.1 7.9 12.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/18/2015 R185 PCH 6th St. NW 11.0 13.4 6.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R186 PCH 6th St. SW N No Ramp 3/18/2015
R187 Gravley Ct. 6th St. SW N No Ramp 3/18/2015R188 Gravley Ct. 6th St. SE 24.0 18.7 15.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R189 Pine St. 6th St. SW N No Ramp 3/18/2015
R190 Pine St. 6th St. SE N No Ramp 3/18/2015R191 Alley (#1039) 6th St. NW 4.5 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/18/2015

1222
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R192 Alley (#1039) 6th St. NE N No Ramp 3/18/2015
R193 Gentry St. 6th St. SW 19.2 3.9 6.2 N N 1" Lip, No Sidewalk on Alley 3/18/2015 R194 Gentry St. 6th St. SE 8.2 10.3 15.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R195 Hollowell Ave. 6th St. SW 11.4 11.0 8.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R196 Hollowell Ave. 6th St. SE 12.1 9.1 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R197 Hollowell Ave. 6th St. NW 9.2 9.3 11.2 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015 R198 Hollowell Ave. 6th St. NE 8.6 11.5 11.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/18/2015R199 Massey Ave. 5th St. NE 8.8 2.1 1.6 Y Y 3/18/2015 R200 Massey Ave. 5th St. SE 4.5 5.3 7.2 2.0 Y N 1/2" Lip 3/18/2015 R201 Massey Ave. 5th St. NW N No transition, Sidewalk is also gutter 3/18/2015 R202 Massey Ave. Across # 340 N No Ramp 3/18/2015R203 PCH 3rd St. NE 12.5 12.4 12.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015 R204 PCH 3rd St. SE 6.6 10.6 11.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015 R205 PCH Aviation Blvd. NW 3.9 1.3 8.0 1.3 Y Y 3/20/2015 R206 PCH Aviation Blvd. NW Curb 1.2 Curb 0.9 Y N W<4'. Intersection, On Aviation Blvd. W<4' 3/20/2015 R207 Aubrey Park Ct. Aviation Blvd. NW 18.0 6.8 8.7 N N 1/2" Lip, No Sidewalk on Aubrey side 3/20/2015 R208 Aubrey Park Ct. Aviation Blvd. NE 19.0 10.8 10.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015R209 Aubrey Park Ct. Montgomery Dr. SE 17.5 5.9 4.7 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/20/2015 R210 Aubrey Park Ct. Montgomery Dr. NE N No Ramp, Sidewalk W=3.5' 3/20/2015R211 Aubrey Park Ct. Aubrey Ct. NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015 R212 Ocean Dr. Montgomery Dr. SW 3.3 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/20/2015 R213 Ocean Dr. Montgomery Dr. NW 4.5 3.3 N N
1" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/20/2015
R214 Ocean Dr. 13th St. NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015 R215 PCH 13th St. SE 16.3 11.4 11.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015R216 PCH 13th St. NE 14.6 15.0 7.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015R217 PCH Pier Ave. SE 7.8 3.5 9.7 3.5 Y N 3/20/2015 R218 PCH 14th St. SE 21.0 12.3 20.0 N/C Y N No Landing 3/20/2015 R219 PCH 14th St. NE 23.2 24.9 37.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1.5" Lip 3/20/2015 R220 Ocean Dr. 14th St. SW 6.8 4.8 6.3 N N 1" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/20/2015 R221 Ocean Dr. 14th St. NW 2.3 N N 1/2" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/20/2015
R222 Ocean Dr. 14th St. NE 11.3 N N 3/20/2015
R223 Ocean Dr. 14th St. SE 16.1 16.6 12.1 N N 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015 R224 Bonnie Brae St. 14th St. SW 1.6 4.5 1.8 1.9 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/20/2015 R225 Bonnie Brae St. 14th St. NW 6.0 7.5 8.2 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/20/2015 R226 Bonnie Brae St. 14th St. NE 8.6 N N 3/20/2015
R227 Bonnie Brae St. 14th St. SE 7.3 14.2 13.6 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/20/2015 R228 Bonnie Brae St. Aviation Blvd. NE 7.5 10.7 10.7 >2.0 N N 3/20/2015 R229 Bonnie Brae St. Aviation Blvd. NW 2.5 6.8 14.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015 R230 Ocean Dr. Aviation Blvd. NE 14.7 N N 3/20/2015R231 Ocean Dr. Aviation Blvd. NW 2.1 5.9 2.3 N/C N N Non‐compliant landing N‐S Direction, Manhole on Ramp 3/20/2015
R232 Owosso Ave. Aviation Blvd. NW 6.8 6.0 13.3 >2.0 N N 3/20/2015 R233 Owosso Ave. Aviation Blvd. NE 6.8 6.5 9.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015R234 Owosso Ave. 14th St. SE 11.8 22.3 25.6 N/C N N No Landing, Ramp damaged 3/20/2015 R235 Owosso Ave. 14th St. SW N No Ramp 3/20/2015

1223
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R236 Corona St. 14th St. SW/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015 R237 Corona St. 14th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015R238 Corona St. 14th St. NE N No Ramp 3/20/2015 R239 Corona St. Aviation Blvd. NE 10.7 11.3 8.1 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015 R240 Corona St. Aviation Blvd. NW 4.6 7.3 7.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015 R241 Prospect Ave. Aviation Blvd. NW 14.2 11.4 20.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015 R242 Prospect Ave. Aviation Blvd. NE 7.9 8.5 11.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/20/2015R243 Prospect Ave. 14th St. SE 4.2 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/20/2015R244 Prospect Ave. 14th St. NE 4.6 11.4 21.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015 R245 Prospect Ave. 14th St. SW 11.3 N N 3/20/2015
R246 Prospect Ave. 14th St. NW Curb 10.9 17.5 N N 3/20/2015R247 Prospect Ave. Campana St. SW 13.2 N N No Sidewalk on Campana St. 3/20/2015 R248 Prospect Ave. Campana St. NW 15.2 N N No Sidewalk on Campana St. 3/20/2015 R249 Campana St. Joy St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015 R250 Bonnie Brae St. Joy St. SW/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015R251 Bonnie Brae St. 15th St. NW/NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015R252 Ocean Dr. 15th Pl. NW/NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015R253 Ocean Dr. 15th St. SW N No Ramp 3/20/2015R254 Ocean Dr. 15th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015R255 PCH 15th St. NE 8.0 7.6 10.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/20/2015 R256 PCH 15th St. SE 13.8 10.0 8.1 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/20/2015 R257 PCH 16th St. NE 12.8 2.5 9.1 N N 3/20/2015
R258 PCH 16th St. SE 9.7 10.2 20.8 >2.0 Y N 3/20/2015
R259 Raymond Ave. 16th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015 R260 Raymond Ave. 16th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015R261 Mira St. 16th St. SW Curb 1.6 0.4 Y Y 3/20/2015 R262 Mira St. 16th St. SE 10.6 1.0 2.7 Y N 3/20/2015R263 Mira St. 15th Pl. NE 8.2 0.3 6.8 N/C (L < 4') Y N 1/2" Lip 3/20/2015 R264 Mira St. 15th Pl. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/20/2015 R265 Bonnie Brae St. 16th St. SE 9.7 7.1 5.7 1.3 Y Y 3/20/2015 R266 Bonnie Brae St. 16th St. SW 0.6 Y Y 3/20/2015
R267 PCH Pier Ave. NW 3.2 7.1 16.5 >2.0 Y N 3/23/2015
R268 # 715 Pier Ave. NE 7.6 Y Y Plaza interance NE 3/23/2015 R269 # 715 Pier Ave. NW 24.7 3.0 2.2 3.0 Y N Plaza interance NW 3/23/2015 R270 Ardmore Ave. Pier Ave. NE 5.2 8.3 11.3 N/C (L < 4') Y N 3/23/2015 R271 Ardmore Ave. Pier Ave. NW 3.5 7.3 9.0 N/C (L < 4') N N 1" Lip/No Sidewalk on Ardmore Ave. 3/23/2015 R272 Valley Dr. Pier Ave. NE 8.6 6.3 10.1 >2.0 Y N 3/23/2015 R273 Valley Dr. Pier Ave. NW Curb 7.3 10.1 >2.0 Y N 3/23/2015R274 Valley Dr. Pier Ave. NW Curb 7.0 Curb Y Y On Valley Dr. 3/23/2015R275 Bard St. Pier Ave. NE Curb 6.8 Curb 1.8 Y Y 3/23/2015R276 Bard St. Pier Ave. NW Curb 7.3 Curb 0.9 Y Y 3/23/2015R277 Cypress Ave Pier Ave. N Curb 6.5 Curb Y Y On Pier Ave. 3/23/2015R278 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. NE Curb 4.1 Curb Y Y On Pier Ave. 3/23/2015R279 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. NE Curb 0.6 Curb 0.9 Y Y On Loma Dr. / No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 3/23/2015 R280 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. NW Curb 0.0 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 3/23/2015 R281 Monterey Blvd. Pier Ave. NE 11.6 4.9 6.8 0.3 Y N 3/23/2015 R282 Monterey Blvd. Pier Ave. NW 5.8 7.1 13.0 2.0 Y N 3/23/2015R283 Monterey Blvd. Pier Ave. NW 4.5 6.8 10.6 1.5 Y N 3/23/2015

1224
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R284 Bay view Dr. Pier Ave. NE Curb 8.9 Curb >2.0 Y N No Sidewalk on Bay view Dr. 3/23/2015 R285 Bay view Dr. Pier Ave. NW Curb 1.5 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on Bay view Dr. 3/23/2015R286 Manhatan Ave. Pier Ave. NE 5.5 8.5 Curb 1.7 Y N 3/23/2015 R287 Manhatan Ave. Pier Ave. NW 3.8 3.4 5.6 0.4 Y Y 3/23/2015 R288 Palm Dr. Pier Ave. NE Curb 5.6 Curb 0.2 Y Y No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 3/23/2015 R289 Palm Dr. Pier Ave. NW Curb 1.1 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 3/23/2015R290 Hermosa Ave. Pier Ave. NE 5.5 2.7 4.7 1.1 Y Y 3/23/2015 R291 Hermosa Ave. Pier Ave. NW 5.6 2.3 5.1 0.3 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015 R292 Beach Dr. 13th St. SW Wall 2.9 1.7 1.0 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R293 Beach Dr. 13th St. SE 4.2 3.2 Wall 1.5 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R294 Beach Dr. 13th St. NE 4.1 3.0 2.6 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015 R295 Hermosa Ave. 13th St. SW 6.4 4.6 7.9 2.0 N N 1" Lip 3/23/2015 R296 Hermosa Ave. 13th St. NW 5.0 2.3 2.9 2.0 N N 3/23/2015 R297 Hermosa Ave. 13th Ct. NW Curb 3.9 3.0 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on 13th Ct. 3/23/2015 R298 Hermosa Ave. 13th Ct. SW 2.9 3.0 Curb 0.5 N N No Sidewalk on 13th Ct./ Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R299 Beach Dr. 14th St. SW 4.8 3.6 3.0 1.4 Y Y 3/23/2015 R300 Beach Dr. 14th St. SE 2.5 1.5 4.5 2.0 Y Y 3/23/2015 R301 Hermosa Ave. 14th St. SW 8.4 5.4 7.0 0.8 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015 R302 Hermosa Ave. 14th St. NW 6.3 3.9 9.4 1.0 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015 R303 Hermosa Ave. 14th Ct. NW 4.7 7.2 N N No Sidewalk on 14th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R304 Hermosa Ave. 14th Ct. SW 5.3 3.1 N N No Sidewalk on 14th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R305 Hermosa Ave. 15th Ct. SW 5.4 Curb 0.8 N N No Sidewalk on 15th Ct./ 1/2" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/23/2015 R306 Hermosa Ave. 15th Ct. NW 6.3 3.9 9.4 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 15th Ct./ 1/2" Lip 3/23/2015 R307 Beach Dr. 11th St. NW 6.2 3.9 9.2 0.1 Y Y 3/23/2015 R308 Beach Dr. 11th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/23/2015 R309 Beach Dr. 11th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/23/2015R310 Beach Dr. 11th St. SE 6.9 3.6 6.9 0.7 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R311 Hermosa Ave. 11th St. SW 13.2 11.9 15.2 0.4 N N Hand Hole on Ramp 3/23/2015 R312 Hermosa Ave. 11th St. NW 20.9 12.0 22.5 0.7 N N 3/23/2015 R313 Hermosa Ave. 11th Ct. NW Curb 3.9 4.5 N N No Sidewalk on 15th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R314 Hermosa Ave. 11th Ct. SW 5.1 4.0 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 15th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R315 Hermosa Ave. 10th St. NW 11.1 5.9 21.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/23/2015 R316 Hermosa Ave. 10th St. SW 8.4 5.9 8.5 N/C (L < 4') N N 3/23/2015 R317 Beach Dr. 10th St. SE 4.3 4.6 3.8 N N No Sidewalk on 10th St. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R318 Beach Dr. 10th St. SW Curb 9.9 1.9 N N 3/23/2015
R319 Beach Dr. 10th St. NW 6.9 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015 R320 Beach Dr. 10th St. NE 11.6 0.5 N N 3/23/2015

1225
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R321 Hermosa Ave. 10th Ct. NW 3.8 N N No Sidewalk on 10th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R322 Hermosa Ave. 10th Ct. SW 4.2 N N No Sidewalk on 10th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R323 Hermosa Ave. 9th Ct. NW 5.9 N N No Sidewalk on 9th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R324 Hermosa Ave. 9th Ct. SW 6.4 N N No Sidewalk on 9th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R325 Hermosa Ave. 8th St. SW 21.5 12.1 22.1 >2.0 N N 3/23/2015 R326 Hermosa Ave. 8th Ct. NW 8.1 N N No Sidewalk on 8th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R327 Hermosa Ave. 8th Ct. SW 9.7 N N No Sidewalk on 8th Ct. 3/23/2015 R328 Hermosa Ave. 7th Ct. NW 13.6 21.5 N N No Sidewalk on 7th Ct. 3/23/2015R329 Hermosa Ave. 7th Ct. SW 18.2 9.9 N N No Sidewalk on 7th Ct. 3/23/2015R330 Hermosa Ave. 6th St. SW 29.0 13.8 27.3 >2.0 Y N 3/23/2015 R331 Hermosa Ave. 6th Ct. NW 7.3 3.4 N N No Sidewalk on 6th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R332 Hermosa Ave. 6th Ct. SW 6.7 6.1 N N No Sidewalk on 6th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R333 Hermosa Ave. 5th Ct. NW 6.0 3.0 N N No Sidewalk on 5th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R334 Hermosa Ave. 5th Ct. SW 3.7 4.2 N N No Sidewalk on 5th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R335 Hermosa Ave. 4th St. NW 17.9 4.0 15.7 0.7 N N 3/23/2015 R336 Hermosa Ave. 4th Ct. NW 9.0 12.6 N N No Sidewalk on 4th Ct. 3/23/2015 R337 Hermosa Ave. 4th Ct. SW 14.3 9.6 N N No Sidewalk on 4th Ct. 3/23/2015 R338 Hermosa Ave. 3th Ct. NW 6.0 13.8 10.2 N N No Sidewalk on 3th Ct./1" Lip 3/23/2015R339 Hermosa Ave. 3th Ct. SW 17.2 8.0 N N No Sidewalk on 3th Ct. 3/23/2015R340 Hermosa Ave. 2nd St. NW 34.9 16.5 29.2 >2.0 N N 1/2" Lip 3/23/2015 R341 Hermosa Ave. 2nd St. SW 14.4 7.9 14.3 N/C Y N No Landing 3/23/2015 R342 Hermosa Ave. Beach Dr. NW 13.1 9.9 9.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/23/2015 R343 Hermosa Ave. Beach Dr. SW 6.8 7.3 5.9 >2.0 N N 3/23/2015 R344 Hermosa Ave. Lydon St. SW N No Ramp 3/23/2015
R345 Beach Dr. 2nd St. SW 6.6 9.9 0.4 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R346 Beach Dr. 2nd St. SE 2.7 3.5 0.4 Y Y No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. 3/23/2015R347 Beach Dr. 2nd St. NE 3.1 1.9 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. 3/23/2015R348 Beach Dr. 2nd St. NW 5.4 5.5 1.4 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015
R349 Beach Dr. 3th Ct. NE N No Ramp 3/23/2015
R350 Hermosa Ave. Pier Ave. SE 5.6 4.9 5.5 0.7 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/23/2015 R351 Hermosa Ave. Pier Ave. NE 5.3 2.5 5.2 0.5 Y Y 3/23/2015R352 Palm Dr. Pier Ave. SW 6.8 3.5 Planting Area 1.9 Y Y 3/23/2015R353 Palm Dr. Pier Ave. SE 5.2 7.7 5.0 Y Y 3/23/2015R354 Manhatan Ave. Pier Ave. SW 6.2 1.6 1.7 Y Y 3/23/2015R355 Manhatan Ave. Pier Ave. SE 5.6 4.0 5.0 Y Y 3/23/2015R356 Manhatan Ave. Pier Ave. SE 9.2 4.9 3.6 1.1 Y Y On Pier Ave. 3/23/2015R357 Bay view Dr. Pier Ave. SW 2.4 2.0 Y Y No Sidewalk on Bay view Dr. 3/23/2015

1226
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R358 Bay view Dr. Pier Ave. SE 7.2 6.6 Y Y No Sidewalk on Bay view Dr. 3/23/2015 R359 Monterey Blvd. Pier Ave. SW 6.4 4.0 0.6 1.2 Y Y 3/23/2015 R360 Monterey Blvd. Pier Ave. SE 4.7 3.2 6.1 0.8 Y Y 3/23/2015 R361 Monterey Blvd. Pier Ave. SE 4.4 4.5 4.7 0.3 Y Y On Pier Ave. 3/23/2015R362 Sunset Dr. Pier Ave. SW 2.1 5.2 0.3 Y Y No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. 3/23/2015R363 Sunset Dr. Pier Ave. SE 4.5 4.4 0.3 Y Y No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. 3/23/2015 R364 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. SW 6.0 4.5 3.7 1.5 Y Y 3/23/2015 R365 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. SE 6.3 1.0 4.4 1.1 Y Y 3/23/2015 R366 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. SE Curb 1.1 Curb 0.4 Y Y On Pier Ave. 3/23/2015R367 Prospect Ave. Campana St. NW 5.1 8.3 14.1 N N No Sidewalk on Campana St. 3/25/2015 R368 Prospect Ave. 16th St. SW 4.9 1.9 0.5 1.1 Y Y 3/25/2015 R369 Prospect Ave. 16th St. NW Curb 4.9 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on 16th St. 3/25/2015 R370 Prospect Ave. 17th St. SW 3.9 2.6 1.8 1.1 Y Y 3/25/2015 R371 Prospect Ave. 17th St. NW Curb 4.3 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on 17th St. 3/25/2015 R372 Prospect Ave. 18th St. SW 2.9 1.0 1.9 Y Y 3/25/2015 R373 Prospect Ave. 18th St. NW 0.9 0.6 2.1 Y Y 3/25/2015 R374 Prospect Ave. #1813 W 5.6 5.0 8.4 >2.0 N N 3/25/2015R375 Prospect Ave. 21st St. SW 6.6 4.1 3.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/25/2015 R376 Prospect Ave. 21st St. NW 6.4 6.4 7.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/25/2015 R377 Prospect Ave. Artesia Blvd. SW 1.8 4.7 7.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/25/2015 R378 PCH Artesia Blvd. SE 10.0 8.5 21.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/25/2015 R379 PCH Artesia Blvd. SE Curb 4.0 Curb N N Island, On PCH / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/25/2015 R380 PCH Artesia Blvd. SE Curb 5.2 Curb N N Middle Island, On PCH / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/25/2015
R381 PCH Artesia Blvd. SE Curb 4.4 Curb N N Middle Island, On Artesia Blvd. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/25/2015R382 PCH 21st St. NE 9.5 17.2 14.2 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 3/25/2015 R383 PCH 21st St. SE 9.6 5.8 5.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/25/2015 R384 PCH 20th St. NE 4.8 8.0 12.1 >2.0 Y N 3/25/2015R385 PCH 20th St. SE 12.3 13.0 8.2 >2.0 N N 2" Lip 3/25/2015 R386 PCH 19th St. NE 5.2 2.7 0.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/25/2015 R387 PCH 19th St. SE 8.8 2.7 0.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/25/2015R388 PCH 18th St. NE 6.5 4.9 9.2 >2.0 N N 3/25/2015 R389 PCH 18th St. SE Curb 1.4 0.6 N N 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on 18th St. (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/25/2015 R390 PCH 17th St. NE 5.2 4.6 8.6 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/25/2015 R391 PCH 17th St. SE 6.9 6.1 3.7 1.6 N N 1/4" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/25/2015
R392 Raymond Ave. 16th St. NE/NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015R393 Raymond Ave. 17th St. SE/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R394 Rhodes St. 18th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015R395 Rhodes St. 18th St. NE 2.7 5.6 8.9 N N 1" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/25/2015
R396 Hillcrest Ave. 18th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R397 Hillcrest Ave. 18th St. NE 1.7 4.5 10.1 N N 3/25/2015 R398 Hillcrest Ave. 21st St. SW 13.7 8.1 3.4 N N 3/25/2015

1227
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R399 Hillcrest Ave. 21st St. SE 5.8 5.2 10.4 N N 3/25/2015 R400 Hillcrest Ave. 21st St. NE 8.3 5.8 8.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/25/2015 R401 Hillcrest Ave. 21st St. NW 4.4 5.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/25/2015R402 Rhodes St. 21st St. SE 9.0 7.2 9.4 N N 1" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/25/2015
R403 Rhodes St. 21st St. SW 12.3 5.9 0.3 N N 3/25/2015
R404 Rhodes St. 21st St. NW 0.6 2.5 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Rhodes St. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/25/2015
R405 Rhodes St. 21st St. NE Curb 11.4 4.8 N N 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on Rhodes St. 3/25/2015 R406 Borden Ave. 21st St. NE Curb 10.8 9.5 N N No Sidewalk on Borden Ave. 3/25/2015R407 Borden Ave. 21st St. NW 3.4 2.5 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on Borden Ave. 3/25/2015 R408 Alley 21st St. NW 16.4 3.6 1.0 N N 3/25/2015
R409 Alley 21st St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R410 Alley Alley NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R411 Alley 20th St. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015R412 Alley 20th St. NW 5.8 4.0 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Alley / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/25/2015 R413 Alley 20th St. SW N No Ramp/No Sidewalk on Alley 3/25/2015R414 Alley Alley NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R415 Rhodes St. Alley NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015R416 Rhodes St. Alley SW 2.0 2.0 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Alley / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/25/2015 R417 Rhodes St. 20th St. NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R418 Rhodes St. Alley SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R419 Rhodes St. Alley NW N No Ramp 3/25/2015
R420 Rhodes St. 19th St. NE 9.5 2.8 6.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/25/2015 R421 Rhodes St. 19th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/25/2015 R422 Prospect Ave. Aviation Blvd. NE 5.6 5.1 5.9 N N 1/4" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/27/2015 R423 Prospect Ave. 15th St. SE 11.3 6.6 6.2 N N No Sidewalk on 15th St. 3/27/2015R424 Prospect Ave. 15th St. NE 5.1 4.4 8.9 N N 1/4" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/27/2015R425 Prospect Ave. 17th St. SE 6.7 3.4 0.2 >2.0 Y N 3/27/2015 R426 Prospect Ave. 17th St. NE Curb 1.2 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on 15th St. 3/27/2015 R427 Prospect Ave. View School E Curb 4.2 Curb >2.0 Y N 3/27/2015 R428 Prospect Ave. 19th St. SE 7.9 3.2 2.0 >2.0 Y N Hydrant on Ramp 3/27/2015 R429 Prospect Ave. 19th St. NE 3.3 4.1 4.1 1.4 Y Y 3/27/2015 R430 Prospect Ave. 20th St. SE 11.7 8.9 7.6 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/27/2015 R431 Prospect Ave. 20th St. NE 3.4 7.0 10.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015R432 Prospect Ave. 20th Pl. SE 6.8 3.7 12.4 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015R433 Prospect Ave. 20th Pl. NE 4.1 0.5 15.6 N N No Sidewalk on 20th Pl. 3/27/2015 R434 Prospect Ave. 21st St. SE 10.8 9.0 7.2 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R435 Prospect Ave. 21st St. NE 4.1 4.4 14.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/27/2015 R436 Prospect Ave. 24th St. SE 13.0 5.5 8.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/27/2015 R437 Prospect Ave. 24th St. NE N No Ramp 3/27/2015
R438 Prospect Ave. Artesia Blvd. SE 5.8 9.7 9.3 0.9 N N 3/27/2015 R439 Meadows Ave. Artesia Blvd. SE N No Ramp 3/27/2015
R440 Harper Ave. Artesia Blvd. SW 11.1 3.1 4.7 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015

1228
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R441 Harper Ave. 24th St. NE 12.3 7.2 2.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R442 Harper Ave. 24th St. SE N No Ramp/No Sidewalk on Harper Ave. 3/27/2015 R443 Harper Ave. 21st St. NW 10.5 3.7 1.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R444 Harper Ave. 21st St. SW N No Ramp 3/27/2015
R445 Harper Ave. 20th Pl. NW N No Ramp 3/27/2015
R446 Harper Ave. 20th Pl. SW 6.8 5.5 10.9 N/C (L < 4') N N 1" Lip 3/27/2015 R447 Harper Ave. 20th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015 R448 Harper Ave. 20th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015R449 Harper Ave. 19th St. NW 12.2 7.9 4.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R450 Harper Ave. 19th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015 R451 Golden Ave. 17th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015 R452 Golden Ave. 17th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015R453 Golden Ave. 17th St. SW 5.2 5.8 4.8 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on Golden Ave. 3/27/2015 R454 Golden Ave. 17th St. SE 5.3 4.1 3.7 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R455 Golden Ave. Alley NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015 R456 Golden Ave. Alley NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015R457 Prospect Ave. Alley (Between 15,17) NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015 R458 Prospect Ave. Alley (Between 15,17) SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015R459 Golden Ave. 15th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015R460 Golden Ave. 15th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 3/27/2015R461 Silver St. 15th St. NW 9.9 6.5 12.4 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R462 Silver St. 15th St. NE 5.9 6.0 5.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/27/2015 R463 Harper Ave. 15th St. NW 38.9 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Harper Ave. 3/27/2015 R464 Harper Ave. 15th St. SW 11.3 N N No Sidewalk on Harper Ave. 3/27/2015R465 Ardmore Ave. 9th St. SE 14.8 10.6 10.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015R466 Ardmore Ave. 9th St. NE 12.7 9.9 16.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015R467 Ardmore Ave. 10th St. SE 16.3 4.5 12.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015R468 Ardmore Ave. 10th St. NE 8.1 7.5 19.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015R469 Ardmore Ave. 11th St. SE 21.9 15.2 17.0 N/C N N No Landing 1" Lip 3/31/2015 R470 Ardmore Ave. 11th St. NE 11.5 7.2 17.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015R471 Ardmore Ave. Pier Ave. SE 15.8 2.4 6.2 >2.0 Y N 3/31/2015 R472 Ardmore Ave. Pier Ave. SW 9.0 4.1 1.8 >2.0 N N 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015 R473 PCH Pier Ave. #2461 E 12.5 8.6 5.8 >2.0 N N On Pier Ave. 3/31/2015 R474 PCH Pier Ave. SW 5.7 8.3 3.3 >2.0 Y N 3/31/2015
R475 PCH 11th Pl. NW 10.2 7.6 5.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015 R476 PCH 11th Pl. SW 11.0 6.9 10.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015R477 PCH # 1107 (Mc Donald's) NW 1.1 0.6 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/31/2015 R478 PCH # 1107 (Mc Donald's) SW 0.7 0.9 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/31/2015R479 PCH 11th St. NW 11.9 11.0 11.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015R480 PCH 11th St. SW 7.8 5.3 15.6 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015R481 Alley 11th St. NE 6.8 7.1 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Alley 3/31/2015 R482 Alley 11th St. NW 4.5 5.8 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Alley / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 3/31/2015 R483 Alley 11th St. SE N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on Alley 3/31/2015R484 Alley 11th St. SW N No Ramp 3/31/2015 R485 PCH 10th St. NW 20.5 N N 3/31/2015
R486 PCH 10th St. SW 13.3 N N 3/31/2015R487 PCH 9th St. NW 9.0 8.5 9.0 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015

1229
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R488 PCH 9th St. SW 9.9 6.8 7.3 N/C N N No Lanindg 3/31/2015 R489 Ardmore Ave. 8th Pl. NE 12.5 10.4 18.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015 R490 Ardmore Ave. 8th Pl. SE 12.4 9.6 11.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015 R491 Ardmore Ave. 7th St. NE 9.9 9.9 14.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015 R492 Ardmore Ave. 7th St. SE 27.2 12.3 19.5 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015R493 Ardmore Ave. 6th St. NE 13.1 12.4 20..4 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015 R494 Ardmore Ave. 6th St. SE 14.5 10.6 11.8 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015 R495 # 676 6th St. S N No Ramp 3/31/2015
R496 Valley Dr. 2nd St. NE 3.5 11.1 12.2 1.8 N N On Valley Dr. 3/31/2015 R497 Valley Dr. 2nd St. SE 10.4 7.4 7.0 >2.0 N N On Valley Dr. 3/31/2015R498 Valley Dr. 2nd St. SW 9.3 8.2 4.6 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015 R499 Valley Dr. 2nd St. NW 5.5 0.5 11.1 0.5 N N 3/31/2015R500 Hill St. 2nd St. NE 16.2 7.5 8.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 3/31/2015 R501 Hill St. 2nd St. NW 41.4 12.0 4.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 3/31/2015 R502 Hill St. Alley NW 17.6 8.8 17.5 N N No Sidewalk on Alley 3/31/2015 R503 Hill St. Alley SW 14.5 13.4 14.7 N N No Sidewalk on Alley 3/31/2015R504 Valley Dr. Herondo St. NE 13.0 10.9 17.9 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015 R505 Valley Dr. Herondo St. NE 7.6 6.8 11.3 >2.0 N N Middle Island 3/31/2015R506 Valley Dr. Herondo St. NW 12.2 11.4 15.5 >2.0 N N Middle Island 3/31/2015R507 Valley Dr. Herondo St. NW 10.6 14.4 10.3 N/C N N No Landing 3/31/2015R508 Valley Dr. # 245 E 6.7 6.8 5.4 1.5 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/31/2015 R509 Valley Dr. # 245 W 3.8 10.3 8.5 N/C N N No Landing, Ramp Cracks 3/31/2015 R510 Valley Dr. South Park SW 6.6 6.6 10.8 1.2 N N On Parking Enterance / 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015 R511 Valley Dr. South Park NW 14.0 11.3 9.1 >2.0 N N On Parking Enterance / 1/2" Lip 3/31/2015 R512 Valley Dr. 6th St. SW 2.5 5.8 23.1 >2.0 N N 3/31/2015 R513 Valley Dr. 6th St. NW 5.9 9.3 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on 6th St.(Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 3/31/2015 R514 Cypress Ave. 6th St. SE N No Ramp 4/1/2015
R515 Cypress Ave. 6th St. SW 14.0 11.1 20.6 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/1/2015 R516 Cypress Ave. 6th St. NW 20.4 14.7 16.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/1/2015R517 Cypress Ave. 6th St. NE 13.0 10.4 11.4 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R518 # 530 6th St. SW N No Ramp in Driveway Crossing 4/1/2015 R519 # 530 6th St. SE 25.8 13.0 Stairs >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R520 # 530 6th St. SW N No Ramp in Driveway Crossing 4/1/2015 R521 # 530 6th St. SE N No Ramp On Parking Enterance 4/1/2015R522 Loma Dr. 6th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015 R523 Loma Dr. 6th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015R524 Loma Dr. 6th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015 R525 Loma Dr. 6th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015R526 Sunset Dr. 6th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015 R527 Sunset Dr. 6th St. NW 2.4 2.4 N N No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R528 Monterey Blvd. 6th St. NE 6.5 7.2 8.2 1.7 N N 1" Lip (Remove the lip + Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 4/1/2015 R529 Monterey Blvd. 6th St. SE 8.9 5.7 8.4 N/C (L < 4') N N 1/2" Lip 4/1/2015R530 Monterey Blvd. 6th St. SW 13.4 6.0 7.5 N/C (L < 4') N N 1" Lip 4/1/2015

1230
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R531 Monterey Blvd. 6th St. NE 6.3 2.8 11.7 >2.0 N N 1/2" Lip 4/1/2015 R532 Bay view Dr. 6th St. NE 1.5 3.9 12.3 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015 R533 Bay view Dr. 6th St. NW 2.4 2.3 6.2 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015R534 Bay view Dr. 6th St. SW Curb 2.8 4.7 Y Y No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015R535 Bay view Dr. 6th St. SE 13.6 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015 R536 Manhatan Ave. 6th St. NE 10.6 9.4 18.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015R537 Manhatan Ave. 6th St. SE 13.3 6.3 4.6 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/1/2015 R538 Manhatan Ave. 6th St. SW 9.0 4.2 1.4 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/1/2015R539 Manhatan Ave. 6th St. NW 1.8 7.8 13.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/1/2015 R540 Palm Dr. 6th St. NE >2.0 N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015 R541 Palm Dr. 6th St. NW 5.8 3.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R542 Palm Dr. 6th St. SW 6.0 3.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R543 Palm Dr. 6th St. SE 9.3 7.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R544 Hermosa Ave. 6th St. NE 10.9 14.0 15.1 >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R545 Hermosa Ave. 6th St. SE 12.2 8.9 13.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R546 Hermosa Ave. 4th St. NE 8.9 8.6 14.1 >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R547 Hermosa Ave. 4th St. SE 10.1 6.6 11.2 >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R548 Hermosa Ave. 2nd St. NE 15.5 15.5 14.5 1.5 N N 1.5" Lip 4/1/2015 R549 Hermosa Ave. 2nd St. SE 13.0 7.5 10.5 >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R550 Hermosa Ave. 1st St. NE 14.5 7.0 10.7 >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R551 Hermosa Ave. 1st St. SE 16.6 13.8 11.9 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing E‐W Direction 4/1/2015 R552 Hermosa Ave. Lyndon St. NE 14.1 10.9 14.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015R553 Hermosa Ave. Lyndon St. SE 11.9 11.9 14.7 0.6 N N 4/1/2015 R554 Hermosa Ave. Herondo St. NE 4.6 12.5 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R555 Palm Dr. Lyndon St. NW 2.8 0.2 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015 R556 Palm Dr. Lyndon St. NE 1.2 6.3 0.2 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015R557 Palm Dr. Lyndon St. SE 10.7 8.8 4.5 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015 R558 Palm Dr. Lyndon St. SW 12.6 9.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015R560 Monterey Blvd. Herondo St. NW 10.0 8.1 12.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R561 Monterey Blvd. Herondo St. NE 8.8 8.3 14.4 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015R562 Monterey Blvd. Lyndon St. SW 0.1 6.5 17.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R563 Monterey Blvd. Lyndon St. NW 6.7 8.7 9.9 N/C Y N No Landing 4/1/2015 R564 Palm Dr. 1st Ct. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015 R565 Palm Dr. 1st St. NW Curb 3.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R566 Palm Dr. 1st St. NE 6.1 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R567 Palm Dr. 1st St. SE 22.6 13.8 16.7 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015 R568 Palm Dr. 1st St. SW 13.8 4.5 18.0 N N 1/2" Lip / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015 R569 Manhatan Ave. 1st St. SW 5.7 1.8 7.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R570 Manhatan Ave. 1st St. SE N No Ramp, leads to Driveway 4/1/2015 R571 Bay view Dr. 1st St. NW 3.5 2.1 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015

1231
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R572 Bay view Dr. 1st St. NE Curb 11.7 12.8 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015 R573 Monterey Blvd. 1st St. SW 16.9 8.5 18.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/1/2015 R574 Monterey Blvd. 1st St. NW 1.8 4.4 14.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015R575 Monterey Blvd. 1st Ct. SW 5.9 8.1 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on 1st Ct. 4/1/2015 R576 Monterey Blvd. 1st Ct. NW 8.0 16.5 N N No Sidewalk on 1st Ct. 4/1/2015 R577 Monterey Blvd. 2nd St. SE 13.1 13.2 18.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/1/2015 R578 Monterey Blvd. 2nd St. SW 9.1 7.4 3.8 >2.0 N N 4/1/2015 R579 Monterey Blvd. 2nd St. NW 10.3 7.6 9.6 1.0 N N Non‐compliant Landing N‐S Direction 4/1/2015 R580 Monterey Blvd. 2nd St. NE 26.5 10.1 21.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R581 Monterey Blvd. 4th St. SE 16.2 8.9 6.2 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/1/2015 R582 Monterey Blvd. 4th St. NE 12.2 8.8 15.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R583 Culper Ct. 4th St. SW N No Ramp 4/1/2015
R584 Culper Ct. 4th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015 R585 Monterey Blvd. 4th St. SW 15.4 6.7 5.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/1/2015 R586 Monterey Blvd. 4th St. NW 6.3 10.6 13.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip / Ramp Cracks 4/1/2015 R587 Bay view Dr. 4th St. NW 4.7 5.3 26.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015R588 Bay view Dr. 4th St. NE 4.7 15.1 23.8 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015 R589 Bay view Dr. 4th St. SE 28.8 11.4 9.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/1/2015 R590 Bay view Dr. 4th St. SW 25.8 9.4 14.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/1/2015 R591 Bay view Dr. 2nd St. NW 5.0 7.8 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015 R592 Bay view Dr. 2nd St. NE 7.7 3.9 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015 R593 Bay view Dr. 2nd St. SE 12.5 11.6 14.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/1/2015 R594 Bay view Dr. 2nd St. SW 1.0 1.3 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015 R595 Manhatan Ave. 2nd St. SE 12.5 9.4 6.8 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/1/2015R596 Manhatan Ave. 2nd St. SW 8.0 4.4 4.4 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R597 Manhatan Ave. 2nd St. NW 1.1 4.3 9.3 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/1/2015 R598 Manhatan Ave. 2nd St. NE 8.3 10.5 7.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/1/2015 R599 Manhatan Ave. 4th St. SW 17.9 6.3 6.7 N/C N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/1/2015 R600 Manhatan Ave. 4th St. NW 0.5 5.0 11.5 N/C N No Landing 4/1/2015R601 Manhatan Ave. 4th St. NE 3.6 7.9 14.8 N/C N No Landing 4/1/2015R602 Manhatan Ave. 4th St. SE 19.6 11.3 3.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/1/2015 R603 Palm Dr. 4th St. NW 4.5 3.9 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R604 Palm Dr. 4th St. NE 6.7 8.6 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R605 Palm Dr. 4th St. SE 6.5 8.4 2.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015 R606 Palm Dr. 4th St. SW 3.9 5.2 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R607 Palm Dr. 2nd St. NW 0.5 0.9 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R608 Palm Dr. 2nd St. NE 0.8 2.3 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R609 Palm Dr. 2nd St. SE 6.9 9.2 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/1/2015 R610 Palm Dr. 2nd St. SW 3.8 8.6 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015
R611 Culper Ct. 2nd St. NW 15.4 6.5 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. 4/1/2015

1232
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R612 Culper Ct. 2nd St. NE 2.9 3.6 N N No Sidewalk on Culper Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/1/2015 R613 Alley 2nd St. NW/NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/1/2015 R614 Alley 2nd St. E N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway / # 423 4/1/2015 R615 Valley Dr. 11th St. SW 13.1 11.9 16.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015 R616 Valley Dr. 11th St. NW 7.7 8.0 12.9 N/C (L < 4') N N 1" Lip 4/2/2015 R617 Valley Dr. 11th Pl. SW 10.8 9.9 16.2 N/C N N No Lanindg, 1/2" Lip 4/2/2015 R618 Valley Dr. 11th Pl. NW 14.1 10.0 8.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip / Ramp Cracks 4/2/2015 R619 Valley Dr. Pier Ave. SW 3.1 6.2 2.4 Y Y 4/2/2015
R620 Valley Dr. Pier Ave. SW Curb 3.6 Curb Y Y On Pier Ave. 4/2/2015 R621 Bard St. Pier Ave. SE Curb 6.1 10.4 0.5 Y N 4/2/2015 R622 Bard St. Pier Ave. SW Curb 7.6 Curb 0.9 Y Y On Pier Ave. 4/2/2015R623 Bard St. Pier Ave. SW Curb 4.2 Curb Y Y On Bard St. 4/2/2015 R624 Valley Dr. Pier Ave. SE 12.4 8.1 5.3 1.7 Y N No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. 4/2/2015 R625 Bard St. 11th Pl. NE 9.3 10.3 4.7 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015 R626 Bard St. 11th Pl. NW N No Ramp 4/2/2015R627 Cypress Ave. Pier Ave. SE 8.0 7.6 12.4 1.2 Y N 4/2/2015 R628 Cypress Ave. Pier Ave. SW 9.5 7.7 8.7 Y Y 4/2/2015R629 Cypress Ave. Pier Ave. SW Curb 5.8 Curb 0.3 Y Y On Pier Ave. 4/2/2015R630 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. SE 6.2 5.4 11.3 1.0 Y N 4/2/2015R631 Loma Dr. Pier Ave. SE Curb 0.5 Curb 1.2 Y Y On Pier Ave. 4/2/2015 R632 Loma Dr. 11th St. NW 0.0 5.5 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/2/2015 R633 Loma Dr. 11th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/2/2015 R634 Loma Dr. 11th St. NE 14.5 8.6 11.6 N/C N N No Landing, Water Valve on Ramp 4/2/2015 R635 Loma Dr. 11th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/2/2015 R636 Cypress Ave. 11th St. NW 15.0 9.9 0.4 >2.0 Y N Water Valve on Ramp 4/2/2015R637 Cypress Ave. 11th St. NE 11.8 6.1 1.6 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015 R638 Loma Dr. 10th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/2/2015 R639 Loma Dr. 10th St. NW 4.8 8.8 19.9 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015 R640 Sunset Dr. 10th St. NE Curb 9.7 12.7 N N No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. 4/2/2015 R641 Sunset Dr. 10th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/2/2015 R642 Sunset Dr. 10th St. SW Curb 1.0 3.2 N N No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/2/2015
R643 Sunset Dr. 10th St. SE 18.5 12.7 18.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. 4/2/2015 R644 Monterey Blvd. 10th St. NE 12.5 3.5 15.2 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 10th St. 4/2/2015 R645 Monterey Blvd. 10th St. SE 13.7 7.2 9.6 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015 R646 Monterey Blvd. 11th St. SE 18.5 2.0 11.3 >2.0 Y N 1/2" Lip 4/2/2015R647 Monterey Blvd. 11th St. NE 9.8 0.3 13.7 0.2 N N 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015R648 Sunset Dr. 11th St. NW 6.7 3.1 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/2/2015
R649 Sunset Dr. 11th St. NE Curb 2.6 7.9 N N No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/2/2015
R650 Sunset Dr. 11th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/2/2015 R651 Sunset Dr. 11th St. SW Curb 6.8 6.8 Y N 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on Sunset Dr. (Remove the lip) 4/2/2015 R652 Monterey Blvd. 10th St. SW 0.6 6.9 23.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/2/2015 R653 Monterey Blvd. 10th St. SE 14.4 6.4 1.8 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015R654 Hermosa Ave. 10th St. SE 16.7 14.1 10.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/2/2015

1233
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R655 Hermosa Ave. 10th St. NE 10.0 12.1 23.5 >2.0 N N 1/2" Lip 4/2/2015 R656 Palm Dr. 10th St. NW 1.2 7.7 Wall N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/2/2015
R657 Palm Dr. 10th St. NE N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/2/2015 R658 Palm Dr. 10th St. SE 10.9 18.0 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/2/2015 R659 Palm Dr. 10th St. SW 7.8 6.0 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/2/2015
R660 Manhatan Ave. 10th St. SW 7.9 4.7 2.3 >2.0 N N 4/2/2015R661 Manhatan Ave. 10th St. NW 2.4 10.1 12.7 >2.0 N N 4/2/2015 R662 Manhatan Ave. 10th St. NE 8.8 14.9 13.6 >2.0 N N 4/2/2015R663 Manhatan Ave. 10th St. SE 22.0 8.7 8.9 >2.0 N N 4/2/2015 R664 Bay view Dr. 10th St. NW 11.0 6.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/2/2015R665 Bay view Dr. 10th St. NE 5.7 13.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/2/2015 R666 Bay view Dr. 10th St. SE 18.3 15.3 22.1 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/2/2015 R667 Bay view Dr. 10th St. SW Planter 0.5 2.4 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/2/2015 R668 Cypress Ave. 7th St. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/2/2015 R669 Valley Dr. 25th St. SW 12.4 9.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 25th St. / 1/2" Lip 4/3/2015 R670 Valley Dr. 25th St. NW 2.4 7.2 19.1 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 25th St. / 1/2" Lip 4/3/2015 R671 Valley Dr. 24th Pl. SW 4.3 9.2 3.6 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/3/2015 R672 Valley Dr. 24th Pl. NW 3.4 6.7 9.2 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/3/2015 R673 Valley Dr. 24th St. SW Curb 4.8 8.9 N N No Sidewalk on 24th St. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/3/2015 R674 Valley Dr. 24th St. NW 9.7 9.9 1.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015R675 Valley Dr. 21st St. NW 4.7 6.2 10.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015R676 Valley Dr. 21st St. SW 15.4 8.3 0.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R677 Valley Dr. 21st St. SW 9.8 4.3 13.0 N/C N N On Valley Dr., No Landing 4/3/2015 R678 Valley Dr. 21st St. SE Curb 20.7 Curb N N 1/4" Lip 4/3/2015 R679 Valley Dr. 20th St. NW Curb 3.9 6.7 N N No Sidewalk on 20th St. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/3/2015 R680 Valley Dr. 20th St. SW 6.8 7.9 3.6 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 20th St. / Water Valve on Ramp 4/3/2015 R681 Valley Dr. 19th St. NW/SW N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on 19th St. 4/3/2015 R682 Valley Dr. 18th St. NW 8.8 10.2 14.0 N/C Y N No Landing Water Valve on Ramp / No Sidewalk on 18th St. 4/3/2015 R683 Valley Dr. 18th St. SW 7.9 7.6 Curb Y Y No Sidewalk on 18th St. 4/3/2015 R684 Valley Dr. Hermosa Valley School NW 2.2 Y Y 4/3/2015 R685 Valley Dr. Hermosa Valley School SW 0.2 Y Y 4/3/2015R686 Valley Dr. Hermosa Valley School SE 13.5 12.8 14.6 >2.0 Y N 4/3/2015R687 Valley Dr. Hermosa Valley School SE Curb 11.1 Curb Y N On Valley Dr. 4/3/2015 R688 Brad St. Oak St. NW/NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015R689 Brad St. Oak St. SW N No Ramp 4/3/2015R690 Loma Dr. Oak St. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015R691 Loma Dr. 16th St. SW 10.2 9.9 9.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R692 Loma Dr. 16th St. NW 7.1 7.5 14.7 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 4/3/2015R693 Monterey Blvd. 16th St. SE 21.9 8.9 16.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R694 Monterey Blvd. 16th St. NE 10.5 9.2 10.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015R695 Monterey Blvd. 19th St. SE 17.8 12.8 7.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/3/2015

1234
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R696 Monterey Blvd. 19th St. NE 8.3 9.3 14.3 N/C N N No Lanindg, 1/4" Lip 4/3/2015 R697 Loma Dr. 19th St. NW 6.0 6.0 22.0 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 4/3/2015 R698 Loma Dr. 19th St. SW 7.4 7.3 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/3/2015
R699 Monterey Blvd. Park Ave. SE 9.6 9.3 9.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R700 Monterey Blvd. Park Ave. NE 7.6 7.1 10.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R701 Loma Dr. Park Ave. NW Curb 1.4 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/3/2015
R702 Loma Dr. Park Ave. NE Curb 13.0 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 4/3/2015 R703 Loma Dr. Park Ave. SE 7.5 9.5 Curb N N Water Valve on Ramp / No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 4/3/2015 R704 Loma Dr. Park Ave. SW Planter 1.2 1.3 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/3/2015
R705 Park Ave. 24th St. NW 4.5 4.0 1.1 >2.0 N N 4/3/2015R706 Park Ave. 24th St. NE 4.7 5.7 13.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R707 Park Ave. 24th St. SE 11.9 12.8 11.2 N N No Sidewalk on 24th St. / Hand Hole on Ramp 4/3/2015 R708 Park Ave. 24th St. SW 18.9 4.2 8.2 N/C N N No Landing, Hand Hole on Ramp 4/3/2015 R709 Silverstrand Ave. 24th St. SE 6.1 6.5 11.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R710 Silverstrand Ave. 24th St. NE 5.6 2.6 12.1 N/C N N No Landing, Hand Hole on Ramp 4/3/2015 R711 Power St. 24th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015R712 Power St. 24th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015R713 Power St. 21st St. NE/NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015 R714 Power St. 21st St. SE/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015R715 Power St. 20th St. SE  ‐  ‐  ‐   ‐  ‐  ‐  ‐ 4/3/2015R716 Power St. 20th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015 R717 Valley Park Ave. 20th St. SE 10.2 9.6 7.6 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on 20th St. 4/3/2015 R718 Valley Park Ave. 20th St. SW 4.2 8.5 1.1 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 20th St. 4/3/2015R719 Valley Park Ave. 18th St. NE 7.9 6.8 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 18th St. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/3/2015R720 Valley Park Ave. 18th St. SE 11.8 10.7 8.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015R721 Morningside Dr. 25th St. NW 12.5 8.6 15.3 N/C Y N No Landing, Dome Missplaced 4/3/2015 R722 Morningside Dr. 25th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/3/2015 R723 Park Ave. 25th St. NE 5.3 3.4 2.8 >2.0 Y N 4/3/2015 R724 Park Ave. 25th St. SE 0.3 7.1 15.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/3/2015 R725 Park Ave. 24th Pl. NE 9.8 7.9 7.7 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/3/2015R726 Park Ave. 24th Pl. SE Curb 7.6 10.2 N N No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/3/2015 R727 Monterey Blvd. Manhatan Ave. NE 2.7 16.7 10.6 N/C N N No Landing, Hand Hole on Ramp 4/6/2015 R728 Manhatan Ave. 22nd St. NW 0.8 0.0 2.2 0.0 N N Hand Hole on Ramp / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015 R729 Manhatan Ave. 22nd St. SW 8.0 5.4 0.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R730 Monterey Blvd. Manhatan Ave. SE 16.1 9.1 13.4 N/C Y N No Landing 4/6/2015 R731 Palm Dr. 22nd St. NE Wall 23.3 23.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015R732 Palm Dr. 22nd St. NW 5.7 1.8 Wall >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Water Valve on Ramp 4/6/2015 R733 Palm Dr. 22nd St. SW 12.0 1.6 4.5 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R734 Palm Dr. 22nd St. SE 33.5 26.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Sewer Hatch on Ramp 4/6/2015 R735 Hermosa Ave. 22nd St. NE 8.5 17.3 15.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R736 Hermosa Ave. 22nd St. SE 14.3 8.6 8.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R737 Hermosa Ave. 21st St. NE 15.5 16.5 20.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R738 Hermosa Ave. 21st St. SE 15.3 12.5 12.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015

1235
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R739 Palm Dr. 21st St. SW 28.9 0.4 3.1 N N 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R740 Palm Dr. 21st St. SE 15.9 26.2 Wall N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R741 Palm Dr. 21st St. NE Curb 12.4 8.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R742 Palm Dr. 21st St. NW 6.3 6.9 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015
R743 Hermosa Ave. 19th St. NE 7.2 15.6 14.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R744 Hermosa Ave. 19th St. SE 18.9 19.8 12.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015R745 Palm Dr. 19th St. NW 11.6 11.2 Planter N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R746 Palm Dr. 19th St. NE 20.4 24.1 25.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R747 Palm Dr. 19th St. SE 23.1 35.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R748 Palm Dr. 19th St. SW Curb 3.5 10.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015R749 Hermosa Ave. 16th St. NE 5.6 12.0 11.9 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015 R750 Hermosa Ave. 16th St. SE 14.9 9.4 9.7 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/6/2015 R751 Palm Dr. 16th St. NW 7.1 9.9 Curb Y N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R752 Palm Dr. 16th St. NE 24.8 27.1 28.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R753 Palm Dr. 16th St. SE 21.2 20.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R754 Palm Dr. 16th St. SW 14.3 3.9 3.0 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R755 Hermosa Ave. 14th St. NE 9.4 11.0 16.7 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/6/2015 R756 Hermosa Ave. 14th St. SE 14.6 6.8 12.9 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 4/6/2015 R757 Palm Dr. 14th St. NW 4.3 6.1 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015
R758 Palm Dr. 14th St. NE Planter 17.6 19.1 N N 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R759 Palm Dr. 14th St. SE 22.4 25.3 Planter N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/6/2015 R760 Palm Dr. 14th St. SW 9.0 3.4 1.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015
R761 Manhatan Ave. 14th St. SW 8.2 3.9 5.9 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015 R762 Manhatan Ave. 14th St. NW 4.8 3.0 7.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R763 Manhatan Ave. 16th St. SW 8.3 3.3 6.6 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015 R764 Manhatan Ave. 16th St. NW 9.7 6.7 14.4 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015 R765 Manhatan Ave. 16th St. NE 5.6 8.4 14.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015R766 Manhatan Ave. 16th St. SE 20.1 9.0 7.2 >2.0 Y N 4/6/2015 R767 Bay view Dr. 16th St. NW 8.2 10.9 Planter N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/6/2015R768 Bay view Dr. 16th St. NE 7.3 27.5 35.1 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/6/2015 R769 Bay view Dr. 16th St. SE 19.1 14.2 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/6/2015 R770 Bay view Dr. 16th St. SW 9.4 8.4 N N 4/6/2015
R771 Monterey Blvd. 16th St. SW 18.9 7.7 8.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R772 Monterey Blvd. 16th St. NW 0.3 16.5 20.5 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015R773 Monterey Blvd. 19th St. SW 15.5 6.9 3.2 N/C N N No Landing, Hand Hole on Ramp 4/6/2015 R774 Monterey Blvd. 19th St. NW 2.4 10.6 12.7 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015 R775 Bay view Dr. 19th St. NW 3.7 0.0 25.0 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/6/2015 R776 Bay view Dr. 19th St. NE 7.2 13.2 10.7 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/6/2015R777 Bay view Dr. 19th St. SE 8.3 12.0 Planter N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. 4/6/2015 R778 Bay view Dr. 19th St. SW Wall 5.2 4.7 N N No Sidewalk on Bay View Dr. / Hand Hole on Ramp / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015R779 Manhatan Ave. 19th St. NE 7.7 12.5 17.1 N N 4/6/2015 R780 Manhatan Ave. 19th St. SE 28.4 22.0 9.5 N N Street Light Hand Hole on Ramp 4/6/2015 R781 Manhatan Ave. 19th St. SW 16.8 3.9 0.1 N N 4/6/2015

1236
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R782 Manhatan Ave. 19th St. NW 1.7 14.6 19.3 N N Ramp Damage 4/6/2015 R783 Manhatan Ave. Circle Dr. SE Curb 7.0 6.4 N N No Sidewalk on Circle Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015
R784 Manhatan Ave. Circle Dr. NE 0.9 9.1 17.8 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Circle Dr. 4/6/2015 R785 Manhatan Ave. 21st St. SW 19.9 6.2 6.7 >2.0 N N 4/6/2015 R786 Manhatan Ave. 21st St. NW 4.2 6.4 11.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R787 Manhatan Ave. Circle Dr. SE 18.5 10.0 5.7 >2.0 N N Circle Dr. near 22nd St. / No Sidewalk on Circle Dr. 4/6/2015 R788 Manhatan Ave. Circle Dr. NE 9.5 13.0 18.2 N/C N N No Landing, Circle Dr. near 22nd St. 4/6/2015R789 Manhatan Ave. Circle Ct. SW 16.9 7.4 10.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R790 Manhatan Ave. Circle Ct. NW 2.3 4.6 8.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/6/2015 R791 Circle Dr. Circle Ct. NE Curb 0.5 4.1 N N No Sidewalk on Circle Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/6/2015
R792 Circle Dr. Circle Ct. SE N No Ramp 4/6/2015
R793 Circle Dr. Bay view Dr. S N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/6/2015 R794 Manhatan Ave. 25th St. SW 8.8 4.4 2.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R795 Manhatan Ave. 25th St. NW 6.5 7.7 5.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/7/2015 R796 Palm Dr. 25th St. NE Curb 10.5 12.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R797 Palm Dr. 25th St. NW 15.1 11.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015R798 Palm Dr. 25th St. SW Curb 7.0 3.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R799 Palm Dr. 25th St. SE 17.7 19.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R800 Hermosa Ave. 25th St. NE 8.6 5.0 6.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R801 Hermosa Ave. 25th St. SE 7.8 10.7 6.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R802 Hermosa Ave. 24th St. NE 26.2 11.9 17.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/7/2015 R803 Hermosa Ave. 24th St. SE 16.2 12.0 13.9 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 4/7/2015 R804 Palm Dr. 24th St. NW 3.9 3.2 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R805 Palm Dr. 24th St. NE 16.5 17.1 N N Ramp Cracks / No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R806 Palm Dr. 24th St. SE 14.2 12.5 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R807 Palm Dr. 24th St. SW 4.6 9.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R808 Manhatan Ave. 24th St. SW 9.0 7.1 2.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R809 Manhatan Ave. 24th St. NW 5.2 1.2 9.4 1.2 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015 R810 Manhatan Ave. Loma Dr. NE 2.1 7.6 8.1 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 4/7/2015 R811 Manhatan Ave. Loma Dr. SE Curb 12.5 14.2 N N No Sidewalk on Loma Dr. 4/7/2015 R812 Manhatan Ave. 24th St. NE 7.4 8.8 13.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R813 Manhatan Ave. 24th St. SE 10.6 8.4 3.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R814 Ozone Ct. 24th St. NW 10.1 7.6 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/7/2015R815 Ozone Ct. 24th St. SW 14.1 12.4 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/7/2015 R816 Ozone Ct. 24th St. SE Curb 19.2 19.0 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/7/2015 R817 Ozone Ct. 24th St. NE 1.2 0.9 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R818 Myrtle Ave. 24th St. NW 0.8 5.1 8.6 >2.0 N N Hand Hole on Ramp 4/7/2015R819 Myrtle Ave. 24th St. NE 14.8 11.6 11.2 >2.0 N N Hand Hole on Ramp / Sidewalk Lift on the Ramp 1" 4/7/2015R820 Silverstrand Ave. 24th St. NW 7.6 1.3 12.8 N/C N N No Landing, Hand Hole on Ramp 4/7/2015 R821 Silverstrand Ave. 24th St. NE 4.9 7.5 15.4 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R822 Park Ave. 24th St. NW 5.0 5.6 11.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015R823 Park Ave. 24th St. SW 6.8 5.0 0.9 >2.0 N N 4/7/2015

1237
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R824 Myrtle Ave. 25th St. NW 8.7 10.3 12.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R825 Myrtle Ave. 25th St. NE 13.9 8.9 10.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R826 Myrtle Ave. 25th St. SE 10.4 7.2 8.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015R827 Myrtle Ave. 25th St. SW 4.7 7.6 10.7 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/7/2015 R828 Ozone Ct. 25th St. NW 0.2 0.6 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R829 Ozone Ct. 25th St. NE Curb 18.0 17.8 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/7/2015 R830 Ozone Ct. 25th St. SE 15.9 14.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/7/2015R831 Ozone Ct. 25th St. SW 4.5 1.5 0.2 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R832 Manhatan Ave. 25th St. NE 9.9 10.1 15.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R833 Manhatan Ave. 25th St. SE 16.9 10.4 10.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015R834 Hermosa Ave. 26th St. SE 16.0 13.0 10.6 N/C N N No Landing, 1.5" Lip 4/7/2015 R835 Hermosa Ave. 26th St. NE 14.5 17.8 31.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R836 Palm Dr. 26th St. NW 1.2 2.4 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R837 Palm Dr. 26th St. NE 9.2 25.4 35.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R838 Palm Dr. 26th St. SE 14.9 15.2 7.7 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R839 Palm Dr. 26th St. SW Curb 5.6 5.7 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R840 Manhatan Ave. 26th St. SW 12.7 5.9 1.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R841 Manhatan Ave. 26th St. NW 3.4 7.2 11.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R842 Manhatan Ave. Greenwich Village SW 7.9 6.5 0.9 N/C N N Non‐compliant landing N‐S Direction 4/7/2015 R843 Palm Dr. Greenwich Village NW 3.8 7.2 16.6 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R844 Palm Dr. Greenwich Village NE 16.8 14.8 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R845 Palm Dr. Greenwich Village SE 13.4 5.2 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015R846 Palm Dr. Greenwich Village SW 5.9 2.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015 R847 Hermosa Ave. Greenwich Village SE 12.1 10.9 6.6 N N 4/7/2015 R848 Hermosa Ave. Greenwich Village SE N Sidewalk Width = 4' / No Ramp 4/7/2015 R849 Hermosa Ave. Greenwich Village NE 8.7 5.6 7.3 >2.0 N N On island / 1" Lip 4/7/2015 R850 Hermosa Ave. Greenwich Village NE 2.3 3.8 14.3 >2.0 N N 4/7/2015R851 Hermosa Ave. Greenwich Village NW N No Ramp on Island 4/7/2015 R852 Hermosa Ave. Greenwich Village NW N No Ramp on Blvd. 4/7/2015 R853 Hermosa Ave. 26th St. SE N Sidewalk Width = 4' 4/7/2015 R854 Hermosa Ave. 26th St. SE N Sidewalk Width = 4' 4/7/2015R855 Hermosa Ave. 26th St. SW Y Sidewalk Width = 5.5' 4/7/2015 R856 Hermosa Ave. 27th St. SE 22.3 10.2 15.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/7/2015 R857 Hermosa Ave. 27th St. NE 14.4 13.1 16.6 N/C Y N No Landing, Manhole on Ramp 4/7/2015 R858 Palm Dr. 27th St. NW 4.3 3.4 16.2 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R859 Palm Dr. 27th St. NE Curb 15.5 Power Pole N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R860 Palm Dr. 27th St. SE Power Pole 10.7 Wall N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R861 Palm Dr. 27th St. SW Curb 1.7 0.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R862 Manhatan Ave. 27th St. NW 4.2 5.1 7.8 >2.0 N N 4/7/2015 R863 Manhatan Ave. 27th St. SW 6.7 1.0 6.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R864 Manhatan Ave. 28th Ct. SW 0.5 3.1 Wall N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015

1238
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R865 Manhatan Ave. 28th Ct. NW 15.6 22.7 Y N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. 4/7/2015 R866 Palm Dr. 28th Ct. NE/SE No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/7/2015 R867 Palm Dr. 28th St. NW 2.3 7.2 5.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R868 Palm Dr. 28th St. NE Wall 20.4 28.4 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Water Valve on Ramp 4/7/2015 R869 Palm Dr. 28th St. SE 12.0 16.1 Y N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015R870 Palm Dr. 28th St. SW 1.2 1.9 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R871 Manhatan Ave. 28th St. SW 16.3 9.7 4.3 Y N 4/7/2015R872 Manhatan Ave. 28th St. NW 7.3 8.5 12.7 N N 4/7/2015R873 Manhatan Ave. 29th Ct. SW 12.3 11.8 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. 4/7/2015 R874 Manhatan Ave. 29th Ct. NW 12.7 10.7 16.4 N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. 4/7/2015 R875 Palm Dr. 29th Ct. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/7/2015R876 Manhatan Ave. 29th St. SW 8.8 9.7 3.3 N/C N N Non‐compliant landing E‐W Direction 4/7/2015 R877 Manhatan Ave. 29th St. NW 6.7 8.1 12.7 >2.0 N N 4/7/2015 R878 Palm Dr. 29th St. NW 11.8 1.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R879 Palm Dr. 29th St. NE 11.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R880 Palm Dr. 29th St. SE 24.7 13.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R881 Palm Dr. 29th St. SW 3.2 1.8 Y Y No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015R882 Palm Dr. 30th Pl. SW/NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/7/2015 R883 Manhatan Ave. 30th Pl. SW 13.9 12.0 14.4 N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. 4/7/2015 R884 Manhatan Ave. 30th Pl. NW Power Pole 8.4 10.7 N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. 4/7/2015 R885 Manhatan Ave. 30th St. SW 11.1 10.3 2.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015 R886 Manhatan Ave. 30th St. NW 10.5 7.6 15.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/7/2015R887 Palm Dr. 30th St. NE 5.3 5.9 9.4 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R888 Palm Dr. 30th St. NW 0.2 1.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/7/2015
R889 Palm Dr. 30th St. SW 14.3 10.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015 R890 Palm Dr. 30th St. SE 21.2 11.2 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/7/2015R891 Manhatan Ave. Neptune Ave. SW 6.2 4.0 4.5 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/8/2015 R892 Palm Dr. Neptune Ave. SE 13.3 20.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R893 Palm Dr. Neptune Ave. SW Curb 0.4 2.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R894 The Strand Neptune Ave. SW 15.2 N N 4/8/2015
R895 The Strand 35th St. NE Curb 7.5 Curb Y Y 4/8/2015R896 The Strand 35th St. SE 15.1 4.3 2.5 N/C N N No Landing, Manhole on Ramp 4/8/2015 R897 Palm Dr. 35th St. NW 0.6 1.9 18.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R898 Palm Dr. 35th St. NE 0.4 15.0 16.5 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015R899 Palm Dr. 35th St. SE 19.3 17.6 15.4 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R900 Palm Dr. 35th St. SW Curb 0.9 1.8 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R901 Manhatan Ave. 32nd St. SW 6.8 10.7 0.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R902 Manhatan Ave. 32nd St. NW 7.0 13.5 15.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R903 Manhatan Ave. 35th Pl. SW 10.1 12.6 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 35th Pl. 4/8/2015 R904 Manhatan Ave. 35th Pl. NW Curb 10.2 8.2 N N No Sidewalk on 35th Pl. 4/8/2015 R905 Palm Dr. 35th Pl. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/8/2015 R906 Manhatan Ave. 34th St. SW 12.9 12.9 11.0 N/C (L < 4') N N 1/4" Lip 4/8/2015

1239
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R907 Manhatan Ave. 34th St. NW 5.6 13.7 11.1 N/C (L < 4') N N Water Valve on Ramp 4/8/2015 R908 Palm Dr. 34th St. NW 2.2 5.6 Planter N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R909 Palm Dr. 34th St. NE Planter 12.9 14.5 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R910 Palm Dr. 34th St. SE 28.7 13.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R911 Palm Dr. 34th St. SW Curb 7.7 5.6 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R912 Palm Dr. 34th Pl. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/8/2015R913 Manhatan Ave. 34th Pl. SW 10.7 11.0 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 34th Pl. 4/8/2015 R914 Manhatan Ave. 34th Pl. NW Curb 8.5 6.4 N N No Sidewalk on 34th Pl. 4/8/2015 R915 Manhatan Ave. 33rd St. NW 6.1 8.1 4.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R916 Manhatan Ave. 33rd St. SW 11.1 12.3 11.8 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R917 Palm Dr. 33rd St. NW Curb 16.1 28.8 Y N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R918 Palm Dr. 33rd St. NE 27.8 15.8 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R919 Palm Dr. 33rd Pl. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/8/2015 R920 Manhatan Ave. 33rd Pl. SW 10.2 13.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R921 Manhatan Ave. 33rd Pl. NW Curb 7.9 10.4 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R922 Manhatan Ave. Longfellow Ave. NW 12.2 10.2 12.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R923 Manhatan Ave. Longfellow Ave. SW 6.6 5.1 8.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R924 Palm Dr. Longfellow Ave. NW 2.4 0.5 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015R925 Palm Dr. Longfellow Ave. NE Curb 19.4 40.1 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R926 Palm Dr. Longfellow Ave. SE 36.0 20.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R927 Palm Dr. Longfellow Ave. SW 16.5 0.8 2.7 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R928 Palm Dr. 32nd Pl. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/8/2015R929 Manhatan Ave. 32nd Pl. SW 8.0 16.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. 4/8/2015R930 Manhatan Ave. 32nd Pl. NW Curb 16.4 12.0 N N No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. 4/8/2015 R931 Manhatan Ave. 31st St. SW 11.4 5.4 9.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/8/2015 R932 Manhatan Ave. 31st St. NW 3.7 7.8 7.7 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/8/2015 R933 Palm Dr. 31st St. NE 7.9 15.3 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R934 Palm Dr. 31st St. NW 10.6 2.2 N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R935 Palm Dr. 31st St. SW 1.7 4.2 Y Y No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R936 Palm Dr. 31st St. SE 24.5 7.8 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Palm Dr. 4/8/2015 R937 Palm Dr. 31st Pl. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/8/2015 R938 Manhatan Ave. 31st Pl. SW 7.3 10.0 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 31st Pl. 4/8/2015 R939 Manhatan Ave. 31st Pl. NW 7.8 6.0 N N No Sidewalk on 31st Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R940 Hermosa Ave. 28th St. NE 9.5 15.5 25.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R941 Hermosa Ave. 28th St. SE 24.6 11.5 7.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R942 Hermosa Ave. 29th St. NE 11.7 10.5 16.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R943 Hermosa Ave. 29th St. SE 17.8 15.6 7.9 N/C Y N No Landing 4/8/2015 R944 Hermosa Ave. 30th St. NE 3.9 11.1 17.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R945 Hermosa Ave. 30th St. SE 20.2 13.9 13.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R946 Hermosa Ave. 31st St. NE 7.2 11.6 14.6 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R947 Hermosa Ave. 31st St. SE 13.6 13.1 8.0 N/C Y N No Landing 4/8/2015 R948 Hermosa Ave. 32nd St. NE 4.7 12.9 18.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R949 Hermosa Ave. 32nd St. SE 19.0 12.9 9.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R950 Hermosa Ave. 33rd St. NE 30.8 17.5 20.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015

1240
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R951 Hermosa Ave. 33rd St. SE 10.0 15.6 16.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R952 Manhatan Ave. 35th St. SE 13.7 7.6 11.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R953 Manhatan Ave. 34th St. NW 3.7 10.0 15.3 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R954 Manhatan Ave. 34th St. SW 8.9 7.4 5.3 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R955 Homer Dr. 35th St. SE 22.8 24.8 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Homer Dr. 4/8/2015 R956 Homer Dr. 35th St. SW N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on Homer Dr. 4/8/2015 R957 Highland Ave. 34th St. SW 15.5 8.0 3.7 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Highland Ave. 4/8/2015 R958 Highland Ave. 34th St. NW 4.2 1.5 13.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4"Lip 4/8/2015 R959 Manhatan Ave. 34th St. NE 8.8 10.5 15.3 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R960 Manhatan Ave. 34th St. SE 8.4 8.0 6.7 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R961 Manhatan Ave. 34th Pl. NE 11.3 8.5 13.6 N N No Sidewalk on 34th Pl. 4/8/2015 R962 Manhatan Ave. 34th Pl. SE Curb 6.6 2.0 N N No Sidewalk on 34th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R963 Highland Ave. 34th Pl. NW Curb 7.1 0.4 N N No Sidewalk on 34th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R964 Highland Ave. 34th Pl. SW 13.0 10.6 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 34th Pl. 4/8/2015 R965 Highland Ave. 33rd St. NW 1.7 11.5 11.3 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/8/2015 R966 Highland Ave. 33rd St. SW 13.5 10.1 2.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R967 Highland Ave. 33rd Pl. NW Curb 7.9 11.6 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R968 Highland Ave. 33rd Pl. SW 5.8 1.3 Stairs N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R969 Highland Ave. 32nd St. NW 4.2 7.3 15.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R970 Highland Ave. 32nd St. NE 16.3 12.8 6.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R971 Highland Ave. 33rd Pl. SE 4.7 8.3 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R972 Highland Ave. 33rd Pl. NE 13.2 10.7 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R973 Highland Ave. 33rd St. NE 10.4 11.7 18.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R974 Highland Ave. 33rd St. SE 18.6 8.6 5.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R975 Highland Ave. 34th St. NE 12.4 8.7 10.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R976 Highland Ave. 34th St. SE 12.5 9.6 12.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R977 Highland Ave. 35th St. SE 16.3 9.4 8.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R978 Manhatan Ave. 33rd St. NE 11.8 7.5 9.2 N/C N N No Landing, Hand hole on Ramp 4/8/2015 R979 Manhatan Ave. 33rd St. SE 16.6 5.4 8.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R980 Manhatan Ave. 33rd Pl. NE 1.1 2.4 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R981 Manhatan Ave. 33rd Pl. SE 12.5 12.1 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R982 Manhatan Ave. Longfellow Ave. NE 8.4 11.4 13.6 >2.0 N N Hand hole on Ramp 4/8/2015R983 Manhatan Ave. Longfellow Ave. SE 9.5 9.1 6.4 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R984 Manhatan Ave. 32nd Pl. NE 10.7 11.0 Wall N N No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. 4/8/2015 R985 Manhatan Ave. 32nd Pl. SE 3.7 1.7 N N No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R986 Manhatan Ave. 31st St. NE/SE N No Ramp 4/8/2015
R987 Manhatan Ave. 31st Pl. NE 1.4 4.3 Wall N N No Sidewalk on 31st Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R988 Manhatan Ave. 31st Pl. SE 6.7 4.6 N N No Sidewalk on 31st Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R989 Manhatan Ave. 30th St. NE/SE N No Ramp 4/8/2015

1241
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R990 Manhatan Ave. 30th Pl. NE 8.2 7.6 N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R991 Manhatan Ave. 30th Pl. SE 6.0 5.1 N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R992 Manhatan Ave. 29th St. NE 6.9 9.3 13.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R993 Manhatan Ave. 29th St. SE 14.2 6.8 7.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R994 Manhatan Ave. 29th Ct. NE 10.3 9.8 N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. 4/8/2015 R995 Manhatan Ave. 29th Ct. SE 7.6 5.0 N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R996 Manhatan Ave. 28th St. NE 5.3 10.5 14.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R997 Manhatan Ave. 28th St. SE 26.0 15.1 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R998 Manhatan Ave. 28th Ct. NE 7.0 10.7 N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. 4/8/2015 R999 Manhatan Ave. 29th Ct. SE 1.8 6.1 N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R1000 Manhatan Ave. 27th St. NE 14.2 17.5 23.6 >2.0 N N Hand hole on Ramp 4/8/2015R1001 Manhatan Ave. 27th St. SE 12.5 9.6 4.7 N/C N N No Landing, On 27th St. 4/8/2015 R1002 Manhatan Ave. 27th St. SE 20.2 17.0 16.5 N/C N N No Landing, On Manhatan Ave. 4/8/2015 R1003 Manhatan Ave. 26th St. NE 9.5 6.5 10.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R1004 Manhatan Ave. 26th St. SE 9.9 11.6 10.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R1005 Ozone Ct. 26th St. SE Curb 14.1 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/8/2015 R1006 Ozone Ct. 26th St. SW 10.7 1.1 2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/8/2015 R1007 Ozone Ct. 26th St. NW 1.4 0.7 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R1008 Ozone Ct. 26th St. NE Privet Ramp 13.4 11.9 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/8/2015 R1009 Ozone Ct. 27th Ct. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/8/2015 R1010 Ozone Ct. 27th St. SE 14.4 11.1 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. 4/8/2015 R1011 Ozone Ct. 27th St. SW Curb 2.4 3.8 N N No Sidewalk on Ozone Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R1012 Myrtle Ave. 26th St. SE 13.9 10.8 8.0 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R1013 Myrtle Ave. 26th St. SW 19.1 10.9 15.3 N/C Y N 4/8/2015R1014 Morningside Dr. 26th St. NE 6.4 2.0 2.0 N N 4/8/2015R1015 Morningside Dr. 26th St. NW Curb 10.4 8.1 N N 4/8/2015 R1016 Morningside Dr. 26th St. SW 19.2 14.0 21.4 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/8/2015 R1017 Morningside Dr. 27th Ct. NW Curb 8.5 3.9 N N No Sidewalk on 27th Ct. 4/8/2015 R1018 Morningside Dr. 27th Ct. SW 17.3 14.2 18.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip / No Sidewalk on 27th Ct. 4/8/2015 R1019 Morningside Dr. 27th St. SW 6.7 10.3 11.6 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing N‐S Direction 4/8/2015 R1020 Morningside Dr. 27th St. NW 13.2 9.5 7.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R1021 Morningside Dr. 28th Ct. NE 9.0 10.0 Planter N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. 4/8/2015 R1022 Morningside Dr. 28th Ct. SE 2.4 2.4 N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1023 Morningside Dr. 28th Ct. SW 3.7 5.9 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1024 Morningside Dr. 28th Ct. NW Curb 9.5 5.8 N N No Sidewalk on 28th Ct. 4/8/2015 R1025 Morningside Dr. 28th St. SW 9.2 11.7 23.2 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip / Ramp Cracks 4/8/2015 R1026 Morningside Dr. 28th St. NW 13.4 7.9 6.8 N/C N N No Landing, Water Valve on Ramp 4/8/2015 R1027 Morningside Dr. 28th St. NE 12.4 11.4 1.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip / Gas Valve on Ramp 4/8/2015 R1028 Morningside Dr. 28th St. SE 5.6 6.2 11.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R1029 Morningside Dr. 29th Ct. NE 8.8 8.4 N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. 4/8/2015

1242
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R1030 Morningside Dr. 29th Ct. SE 9.3 9.9 N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. 4/8/2015 R1031 Morningside Dr. 29th Ct. SW Planter 9.1 3.6 N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. 4/8/2015R1032 Morningside Dr. 29th Ct. NW 5.8 7.3 Planter N N No Sidewalk on 29th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1033 Morningside Dr. 29th St. NW 15.8 14.6 13.7 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/8/2015 R1034 Morningside Dr. 29th St. SW 11.3 11.3 19.8 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R1035 Morningside Dr. 29th St. SE Curb 9.3 11.2 N N No Sidewalk on 29th St. 4/8/2015 R1036 Morningside Dr. 29th St. NE 9.3 7.4 4.8 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 29th St. 4/8/2015 R1037 Morningside Dr. 30th Pl. SW 8.0 8.6 N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. 4/8/2015 R1038 Morningside Dr. 30th Pl. NW 7.3 1.0 N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1039 Morningside Dr. 30th Pl. NE N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. 4/8/2015 R1040 Morningside Dr. 30th Pl. SE 3.0 3.1 N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1041 Morningside Dr. 30th St. NW/SW N No Ramps on Morningside Dr. 4/8/2015 R1042 Morningside Dr. 30th St. NE 13.9 13.3 9.4 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 30th St. 4/8/2015R1043 Morningside Dr. 30th St. SE 9.4 7.8 6.6 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on 30th St. 4/8/2015 R1044 Morningside Dr. 31st Pl. SW 7.4 8.5 15.9 1.7 N N 4/8/2015 R1045 Morningside Dr. 31st Pl. NW N No Ramp 4/8/2015
R1046 Morningside Dr. 31st Pl. NE 15.4 11.9 24.6 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015R1047 Morningside Dr. 31st Pl. SE N No Ramp 4/8/2015R1048 Morningside Dr. 31st St. NW/SW N No Ramps on Morningside Dr. 4/8/2015 R1049 Morningside Dr. 31st St. NE 9.1 9.4 12.7 N/C N N 4/8/2015 R1050 Morningside Dr. 31st St. SE 11.4 9.1 13.1 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R1051 Morningside Dr. 32nd Pl. SW 19.3 4.4 Y N No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. 4/8/2015 R1052 Morningside Dr. 32nd Pl. NW N No Ramp 4/8/2015
R1053 Morningside Dr. 32nd Pl. NE 2.3 2.9 N N No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1054 Morningside Dr. 32nd Pl. SE N No Ramp 4/8/2015
R1055 Morningside Dr. Longfellow Ave. SE 0.5 8.1 13.6 N/C N N No Landing, Manhole on Ramp 4/8/2015 R1056 Morningside Dr. Longfellow Ave. NE 14.0 8.6 6.4 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/8/2015 R1057 Morningside Dr. Longfellow Ave. NW 12.8 11.8 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R1058 Morningside Dr. Longfellow Ave. SW 17.8 14.6 11.0 N/C N N No Landing 4/8/2015 R1059 Morningside Dr. 33rd Pl. SW 8.4 6.7 Wall N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015 R1060 Morningside Dr. 33rd Pl. NW Curb 23.6 18.5 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R1061 Morningside Dr. 33rd Pl. NE Planter 26.6 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd Pl. 4/8/2015 R1062 Morningside Dr. 33rd Pl. SE N No Ramp 4/8/2015
R1063 Morningside Dr. 33rd St. SE 9.0 7.8 8.7 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on 33rd St. 4/8/2015 R1064 Morningside Dr. 33rd St. SW 2.1 10.1 7.2 N/C (L < 4') Y N 4/8/2015 R1065 Morningside Dr. 33rd St. NW 11.2 9.6 16.8 N/C (L < 4') N N 1" Lip 4/8/2015 R1066 Morningside Dr. 34th St. SW 11.9 6.1 10.2 1.2 N N 1" Lip 4/8/2015 R1067 Morningside Dr. 34th St. NW 9.1 10.3 14.0 >2.0 N N 4/8/2015 R1068 Morningside Dr. 35th St. SW 14.8 13.4 10.8 1.6 N N 4/8/2015 R1069 Crest Dr. 34th St. NE Planter 14.3 31.1 N N No Sidewalk on 34th St. 4/8/2015R1070 Crest Dr. 34th St. NW 7.8 12.1 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 34th St. 4/8/2015R1071 Crest Dr. 34th St. SW Curb 11.5 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 34th St. 4/8/2015

1243
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R1072 Crest Dr. 34th St. SE Curb 7.5 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 34th St. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R1073 Crest Dr. 33rd St. NW Curb 11.6 3.6 N N No Sidewalk on Crest Dr. 4/8/2015R1074 Crest Dr. 33rd St. SW 3.6 4.6 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Crest Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/8/2015
R1075 Ingleside Dr. 33rd St. SW 10.8 7.2 14.8 1.5 N N 4/9/2015R1076 Ingleside Dr. 33rd Pl. SW/SE N No Ramp 4/9/2015 R1077 Vista Dr. 33rd St. SW/SE N No Ramp 4/9/2015
R1078 Vista Dr. 33rd Pl. SW/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1079 Ingleside Dr. Longfellow Ave. SW 9.7 10.8 8.8 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/9/2015 R1080 Ingleside Dr. Longfellow Ave. NW 20.8 5.5 3.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/9/2015 R1081 Ingleside Dr. Longfellow Ave. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1082 Valley Dr. Longfellow Ave. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1083 Valley Dr. 32nd Pl. NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1084 Ingleside Dr. 32nd Pl. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1085 Ingleside Dr. 32nd Pl. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1086 Ingleside Dr. 32nd Pl. NW N No Ramp 4/9/2015R1087 Ingleside Dr. 32nd Pl. SW 6.5 8.1 Y Y No Sidewalk on 32nd Pl. 4/9/2015 R1088 Ingleside Dr. 31st St. NW 18.1 9.6 15.0 N/C Y N No Landing 4/9/2015 R1089 Ingleside Dr. 31st St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1090 Ingleside Dr. 31st St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1091 Ingleside Dr. 31st St. NE N No Ramp 4/9/2015 R1092 Valley Dr. 31st St. SW 14.9 11.2 11.5 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. and 31st St. 4/9/2015 R1093 Valley Dr. 31st St. NW 13.8 12.5 12.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/9/2015 R1094 Valley Dr. 31st Pl. NW Curb 1.1 0.1 N N No Sidewalk on 31st Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/9/2015 R1095 Valley Dr. 31st Pl. SW 6.4 12.5 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 31st Pl. 4/9/2015 R1096 Valley Dr. 30th St. NW 11.6 6.2 5.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on 30th St. 4/9/2015 R1097 Valley Dr. 30th St. SW 10.6 8.2 6.4 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. and 30th St. 4/9/2015 R1098 Ingleside Dr. 30th St. NW N Narrow Sidewalk W<4' / No Ramp 4/9/2015 R1099 Ingleside Dr. 30th St. NE N No Ramp/No Sidewalk on 30th St. 4/9/2015 R1100 Ingleside Dr. 30th St. SE 18.9 9.3 8.8 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 30th St. 4/9/2015 R1101 Ingleside Dr. 30th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1102 Ingleside Dr. 31st Pl. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1103 Ingleside Dr. 31st Pl. NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1104 Ingleside Dr. 30th Pl. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1105 Ingleside Dr. 30th Pl. SE 6.6 7.6 8.8 >2.0 N N 4/9/2015 R1106 Ingleside Dr. 30th Pl. SW 20.3 6.8 N N Power Pole on Ramp / No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. 4/9/2015 R1107 Ingleside Dr. 30th Pl. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1108 Valley Dr. 30th Pl. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1109 Valley Dr. 30th Pl. SW 8.4 6.3 Planter N N No Sidewalk on 30th Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/9/2015 R1110 Valley Dr. 29th St. W 9.6 9.3 14.5 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. 4/9/2015 R1111 Ingleside Dr. 29th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1112 Ingleside Dr. 29th St. NW Planter 19.3 23.4 N/C N N No Landing, No Sidewalk on 29th St. 4/9/2015R1113 Ingleside Dr. 29th St. E 18.5 9.0 16.5 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on 29th St. 4/9/2015R1114 Ingleside Dr. 29th Ct. NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015R1115 Ingleside Dr. 28th St. NW 1.7 6.7 13.6 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/9/2015

1244
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R1116 Ingleside Dr. 28th St. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/9/2015 R1117 Ingleside Dr. 28th St. SE N No transition, Sidewalk is also gutter 4/9/2015 R1118 Valley Dr. 28th St. W N Ramp to nowhere 4/9/2015
R1119 Ardmore Ave. Porter Ln. NE 12.1 20.2 14.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip / Narrow Sidewalk on Poeter Ln. W=2' 4/9/2015 R1120 Ardmore Ave. Porter Ln. SE 24.3 16.5 9.8 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip / Narrow Sidewalk on Poeter Ln. W=2' 4/9/2015 R1121 Ardmore Ave. 30th St. NE 9.8 13.4 15.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/9/2015 R1122 Ardmore Ave. 30th St. SE 14.6 7.3 5.5 N/C N N No Landing 4/9/2015 R1123 Ardmore Ave. 30th St. SW 3.6 7.4 15.8 >2.0 N N 4/9/2015 R1124 Ardmore Ave. 30th St. NW 10.6 1.6 0.5 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/9/2015 R1125 Valley Dr. 30th St. NE 2.8 3.3 9.4 >2.0 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. 4/9/2015 R1126 Valley Dr. 30th St. SE 11.4 9.7 6.1 >2.0 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Valley Dr. 4/9/2015R1127 Ardmore Ave. Longfellow Ave. SW 13.7 8.9 4.2 1.6 N N No Sidewalk on Ardmore Ave. 4/10/2015 R1128 Ardmore Ave. Longfellow Ave. SE 8.7 11.6 11.7 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing N‐S Direction 4/10/2015 R1129 Ardmore Ave. Longfellow Ave. NE 7.3 5.1 18.8 N/C N N Non‐compliant Landing E‐W Diretion, 1" Lip 4/10/2015 R1130 Ardmore Ave. Boundry Pl. SE Planter 11.5 2.3 N N 2" Lip / No Sidewalk on Boundry Pl. 4/10/2015R1131 Tennyson Pl. Boundry Pl. SE N N Power Pole on Ramp / No Sidewalk on Boundry Pl. 4/10/2015 R1132 Tennyson Pl. Boundry Pl. SW 23.5 11.9 13.3 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Tennyson Pl. 4/10/2015 R1133 Tennyson Pl. Longfellow Ave. NW 7.2 10.2 22.3 >2.0 N N 1" Lip 4/10/2015 R1134 Tennyson Pl. Longfellow Ave. NE 15.4 17.1 N N No Sidewalk on Tennyson Pl. 4/10/2015 R1135 Tennyson Pl. Longfellow Ave. SE 17.0 21.2 N N No Sidewalk on Tennyson Pl. 4/10/2015 R1136 Tennyson Pl. Longfellow Ave. SW 11.1 8.6 N N No Sidewalk on Tennyson Pl. 4/10/2015 R1137 PCH Longfellow Ave. SW 2.8 6.4 16.5 >2.0 Y N 4/10/2015 R1138 PCH Longfellow Ave. SW 3.1 6.3 9.8 >2.0 Y N 4/10/2015R1139 PCH Longfellow Ave. NW 6.3 7.0 11.5 N/C Y N Non‐compliant Landing N‐S Direction 4/10/2015 R1140 PCH Boundry Pl. SW 2.7 0.6 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Boundry Pl. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015R1141 PCH Alley NW N No Ramp / No Sidewalk on Alley 4/10/2015 R1142 PCH Alley SW Curb 10.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Alley 4/10/2015 R1143 PCH 30th St. SW 4.5 6.5 10.5 N N 4/10/2015R1144 PCH 30th St. NW 3.0 8.1 9.7 N N 1/2" Lip (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 4/10/2015
R1145 #101 30th St. SW 25.3 12.9 21.8 N N 2" Lip / No Sidewalk on 30th St. 4/10/2015 R1146 La Carlita Pl. 30th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1147 La Carlita Pl. 30th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1148 La Carlita Pl. Marlita Pl. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1149 La Carlita Pl. Marlita Pl. NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1150 Tennyson Pl. 30th St. NE 9.6 17.6 23.8 >2.0 N N 4/10/2015 R1151 Tennyson Pl. 30th St. NW 1.7 4.6 9.0 1.5 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015 R1152 Tennyson Pl. 30th St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1153 Tennyson Pl. 30th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1154 Tennyson Pl. Alley W N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1155 Tennyson Pl. Alley E N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1156 Amby Pl. 30th St. SE 21.0 23.0 22.6 >2.0 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on Amby Pl. 4/10/2015 R1157 Amby Pl. 30th St. NW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1158 Amby Pl. Braeholm Pl. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1159 Braeholm Pl. 30th St. SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015

1245
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R1160 Braeholm Pl. 30th St. SW 24.1 9.9 2.2 N/C N N No Landing 4/10/2015 R1161 Alley 30th St. NW/NE N No Ramp 4/10/2015R1162 Alley Alley SE/NE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1163 Alley Longfellow Ave. SW Planter 6.0 4.1 N N 1/2" Lip / No Sidewalk on Alley (Remove the lip, Requires truncated dome to meet compliance ) 4/10/2015 R1164 Alley Longfellow Ave. SE Curb 19.3 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Alley 4/10/2015R1165 Hermosa View Dr. 30th St. SW 20.7 9.8 4.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/10/2015 R1166 Hermosa View Dr. 30th St. SE 29.3 6.8 3.4 N/C N N No Landing 4/10/2015 R1167 PCH 24th Pl. NW 15.8 12.6 19.5 >2.0 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/10/2015 R1168 PCH 24th Pl. SW 10.8 9.0 22.3 N/C N N No Landing 4/10/2015 R1169 PCH 24th St. NW 17.1 14.3 36.8 N/C N N 1.5" Lip 4/10/2015 R1170 PCH 24th St. SW 23.4 10.4 21.9 N/C N N 2" Lip 4/10/2015R1172 PCH 21st St. NW 23.0 23.5 39.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/10/2015R1173 PCH 21st St. SW 15.3 10.5 3.2 >2.0 N N 1/4" Lip 4/10/2015 R1174 PCH 16th St. SW 14.5 12.3 17.3 >2.0 N N 4/10/2015 R1175 PCH 16th St. NW 3.8 12.7 21.0 N/C N N No Landing, 1/4" Lip 4/10/2015 R1176 # 715 16th St. SE 15.4 21.9 N N 4/10/2015
R1177 # 715 16th St. SW Planter 5.2 4.4 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015 R1178 # 771 16th St. NW N No Ramp in Driveway Crossing 4/10/2015 R1179 Ardmore Ave. 16th St. NE 3.8 6.8 19.9 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/10/2015R1180 Ardmore Ave. 16th St. SE 23.0 15.3 9.9 N/C N N No Landing 4/10/2015 R1181 Ardmore Ave. Alley 270' South of 21th St. SE 8.1 7.1 N N No Sidewalk on Alley / Ramp Damaged 4/10/2015R1182 Ardmore Ave. Alley NE 7.9 7.4 N N No Sidewalk on Alley / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015R1183 Ardmore Ave. 21st St. NE 15.6 9.3 7.7 N/C N N No Landing, Manhole on Ramp 4/10/2015 R1184 Ardmore Ave. 21st St. NW 8.0 11.5 9.8 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Ardmore Ave. 4/10/2015 R1185 Ardmore Ave. 21st St. SE Curb 5.0 10.1 N N 1/4" Lip / No Sidewalk on 21st St. / Ramp Cracks and Water Valve on Ramp 4/10/2015
R1186 Ava St. 21st St. SE/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1187 Ava St. Alley NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1188 Ava St. Alley NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1189 Springfield Ave. 21st St. SE N No Ramp 4/10/2015R1190 Springfield Ave. 21st St. SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1191 Springfield Ave. Alley NW/SW N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1192 Springfield Ave. Alley NE/SE N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015R1193 Ardmore Ave. 24th St. SE N No clear path of travel on ramp. 4/10/2015 R1194 Ardmore Ave. 24th St. NE 13.2 9.7 18.2 N/C (L < 4') N N 1/2" Lip / No Sidewalk on 24th St. 4/10/2015 R1195 Ardmore Ave. 24th Pl. SE Planter 18.6 13.8 N N 1/2" Lip / No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/10/2015 R1196 Ardmore Ave. 24th Pl. NE 16.5 22.9 Planter N N 1/2" Lip / No Sidewalk on 24th Pl. 4/10/2015 R1197 Ardmore Ave. 25th St. SE 24.8 12.2 13.5 N/C N N No Landing, 1/2" Lip 4/10/2015R1198 Ardmore Ave. 25th St. NE 17.1 12.7 19.1 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/10/2015R1199 Hermosa Ave. 24th St. NW 14.0 9.7 17.7 N N 4/10/2015 R1200 Hermosa Ave. 24th St. SW 16.2 9.9 15.2 N/C N N No Landing, 1" Lip 4/10/2015 R1201 Beach Dr. 24th St. SE 18.8 11.4 3.7 >2.0 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. 4/10/2015 R1202 Hermosa Ave. # 2327 S 12.0 6.8 12.7 N/C N N No Landing 4/10/2015R1203 Hermosa Ave. 22nd St. NW 5.8 7.2 9.0 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/10/2015 R1204 Hermosa Ave. 22nd St. SW 8.5 8.1 10.5 >2.0 N N 4/10/2015

1246
Hermosa Beach ADA Inspection
Curb Ramps
Street Cross Street Corner L Flare (%) Ramp (%) R Flare (%) Landing (%) Dome Insp.Date
Picture Comments Location ADA Ramp ADA Compliant
R1205 Hermosa Ave. 21st Ct. NW 10.6 13.9 N N No Sidewalk on 21st Ct. 4/10/2015 R1206 Hermosa Ave. 21st Ct. SW 13.3 7.4 Curb N N No Sidewalk on 21st Ct. 4/10/2015R1207 Hermosa Ave. 20th Ct. NW 8.0 17.0 N N No Sidewalk on 20th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1208 Hermosa Ave. 20th Ct. SW 15.4 10.9 N N No Sidewalk on 20th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1209 Hermosa Ave. 19th St. W 9.2 0.1 10.8 N N 4/10/2015 R1210 Hermosa Ave. 19th Ct. NW 22.9 35.1 N N No Sidewalk on 19th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1211 Hermosa Ave. 19th Ct. SW 19.8 14.2 N N No Sidewalk on 19th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1212 Hermosa Ave. 18th Ct. NW 12.7 12.9 N N 1" Lip / No Sidewalk on 18th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1213 Hermosa Ave. 18th Ct. SW 18.7 19.4 N N No Sidewalk on 18th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1214 Hermosa Ave. 17th Ct. NW Curb 3.4 6.6 N N No Sidewalk on 17th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015
R1215 Hermosa Ave. 17th Ct. SW 14.0 6.7 N N No Sidewalk on 17th Ct. 4/10/2015 R1216 Hermosa Ave. 16th St. NW 19.7 8.5 20.6 N N 4/10/2015R1217 Hermosa Ave. 16th St. SW 7.8 0.5 10.0 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015 R1218 Hermosa Ave. 16th Ct. NW Curb 14.6 20.7 N N On Hermosa Ave. 4/10/2015 R1219 Hermosa Ave. 16th Ct. NW Curb 5.4 Curb N N On 16th Ct. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015 R1220 Hermosa Ave. 16th Ct. SW 7.0 7.9 N N Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015 R1221 Hermosa Ave. 15th St. NW 9.7 5.7 20.7 0.6 N N 4/10/2015 R1222 Hermosa Ave. 15th St. SW 9.4 6.9 9.0 N/C (L < 4') N N 4/10/2015 R1223 Beach Dr. 15th St. NW N N 2" Lip/ No Sidewalk on 15th St. 4/10/2015R1224 Beach Dr. 15th St. NE Curb 6.5 10.2 N N No Sidewalk on 15th St. 4/10/2015R1225 Beach Dr. 22nd St. SW 6.0 5.2 N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015
R1226 Beach Dr. 22nd St. SE 13.4 13.9 Curb N N No Sidewalk on Beach Dr. 4/10/2015 R1227 Alley 22nd St. SW Curb 7.7 9.1 N N No Sidewalk on Alley / Requires truncated dome to meet compliance 4/10/2015 R1228 Alley 22nd St. SE 10.1 1.4 9.5 N N No Sidewalk on Alley 4/10/2015 R1229 Alley 22nd Ct. W N No Ramp/Sidewalk pathway 4/10/2015 R1232 Hermosa Ave. 25th St. W 7.3 13.1 8.7 N N 4/10/2015 R1233 Hermosa Ave. 26th St. W 16.8 14.9 21.4 N N 4/10/2015 R1234 Hermosa Ave. Longfellow Ave. W N N No ramp landing at crosswalk, missing truncated domes, speed bumps in path of travel 4/10/2015

1247
2901 West Coast Hwy, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 270-2775 www.adaexperts.net February 16, 2022
City of Hermosa Beach
Department of Public Works
1315 Valley Drive, Basement Level,
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attention: Mr. Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer
Subject: Feasibility Study for an Accessible Trail along the Greenbelt for the Department of Public Works in the City of Hermosa Beach, California Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

Access, Inc. is pleased to have the opportunity to be of service to the City of Hermosa Beach by performing a feasibility study to assess the practicality of providing an accessible route along a portion, or throughout the Greenbelt, which is located between Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive from Herondo Street to the north city limit with the City of Manhattan Beach.

As will be explained in greater detail in the Greenbelt Feasibility Study for ADA Accessibility, incorporating accessibility into the design of outdoor developed areas must begin early in the planning process, with careful consideration given to the route type, material selection, and location of accessible elements.

If there are any questions or clarification is needed, please contact our office at (949) 270- 2775.

Respectfully,
Matthew D. Steele
Certified Access Specialist (CASp) #865
1248
2 | P a g e

GREENBELT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
1249
3 | P a g e

1.0 PROPERTY INFORMATION
The subject facility is a nature path currently used primarily by pedestrians.

2.0 REPORT SCOPE
In early 2021, the City engaged Access, Inc. to determine if it is feasible for an accessible route to be provided through all or a portion of the Greenbelt. This report seeks to identify potential construction-related barriers within the existing Greenbelt which persons with disabilities may encounter and which may prevent full and equal access to the activities along the Greenbelt.

3.0 BACKGROUND
It is understood the Greenbelt was developed in 1986 on an abandoned Santa Fe Railroad spur, which once provided a rail connection between the Redondo Beach Wharf and downtown Los Angeles. The City planted vegetation, and added bark woodchips and mulch on the ground.

Over time, the City has provided for incremental access improvements to the Greenbelt with the construction of curb ramps and ramps at cross streets and various mid-block points of access. Additionally, the City has also installed workout stations, water fountains, benches and historic monuments.

A. CURRENT ZONING AND USE RESTRICTIONS
The Greenbelt is currently zoned O-S-1 RESTRICTED OPEN SPACE. As per Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) § 17.32.010, the O-S-1 zone is intended to restrict further the use of certain designated open space to assure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreation areas. The uses permitted in the O-S-1 zone are codified in Hermosa HBMC § 17.30.020 and lists 13 types of uses (e.g., public parks, playgrounds, bicycling and pedestrian walkways, etc.). Furthermore, improvements permitted in the Greenbelt area shall be as follows:

A. Only nonbuilding public improvements relating to landscaping, beautification, erosion control and irrigation improvements by the city which are consistent with or necessary to maintain and assure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreation purposes or relating to anti-seawater intrusion wells as an existing use.
1250
4 | P a g e
B. Improvements to only those two existing parking areas located within the Greenbelt area across from Clark Stadium and City Hall consistent with or necessary to maintain and assure designated parking spaces, without expanding the existing parking area. Such improvements shall be of a nature and material designed to enhance and preserve the existing natural landscape.

Additional information and analysis regarding the allowable uses for the Greenbelt may be found in the memorandum titled Improvements on the Greenbelt authored by City Attorney, Mr. Michael Jenkins, dated February 22, 2018 (Attachment A).

B. APPLICABLE STANDARDS
The 1991 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards nor the 2010 ADA Standards reference outdoor trails, therefore the Greenbelt is “Safe Harbored.” With that said, accessible trail improvements are required to be provided when alterations occur, or through a barrier removal plan, which will be included in the City’s Transition Plan. The ADA does not have a provision to "grandfather" a facility, but it does have a provision called “safe harbor” in the 2010 ADA regulations for state and local governments. A "safe harbor" means that City does not have to make modifications to elements in a facility that comply with the 1991 ADA Standards, even if the 2010 ADA Standards have different requirements for them. This provision is applied on an element-by-element basis.

However, if City chooses to alter elements that were in compliance with the 1991 ADA Standards, the altered elements must comply with the 2010 ADA Standards and latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC).

The accessibility standards generally apply to buildings and facilities. Parking lots, play areas, patios, constructed trails, man-made outdoor areas are often not considered to be buildings. Rather, these elements are generally considered to be facilities.

The Access Board is responsible for developing accessibility guidelines for the construction and alteration of facilities covered by the ADA of 1990 and the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) of 1968. The guidelines ensure that the facilities are readily accessible to and usable by people with disabilities. The Access Board issued guidelines in 2004, and contain provisions for several types of recreation facilities including boating facilities, fishing piers and platforms, golf facilities, play areas, sports facilities, and swimming pools. The Access Board amended the 2004 guidelines in 2013 by adding new provisions for trails, picnic and camping facilities, viewing areas, and beach access routes constructed or altered by Federal agencies or by non-federal entities on Federal land on behalf of a Federal agency pursuant to a concession contract, partnership agreement, or similar arrangement.
1251
5 | P a g e
The new provisions for trails, picnic and camping facilities, viewing areas, and beach access routes are not included in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) 2010 ADA Standards and have no legal effect on State and local governments and private entities subject to DOJ’s ADA regulations. State and local governments may, however, use the provisions for guidance when designing trails, picnic and camping facilities, viewing areas, and beach access routes. State and local governments are cautioned to check with DOJ about using the technical requirements for outdoor recreation access routes, instead of accessible routes, to connect elements at picnic and camping facilities, viewing areas, and trailheads.

For the purpose of this feasibility study, the 2014 ABA Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas and 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design are referenced. California State Parks Accessible Guidelines are also available for the elements included in this report although there are no major differences in the standards for the proposed uses.

4.0 OBSERVATIONS
The observations contained herein are based on a visual survey of the existing Greenbelt facility. The intent of the observation was to determine the general condition of representative portions of the existing recreational facility and related disabled access compliance. The tools used to perform the survey included: a digital level, various length tape measures and a digital camera.

The surfacing materials generally consist of wood chips and mulch over much of the path length. These improvements are typical of the developed portions of the Greenbelt, apart from the transitional areas at street intersections. Grades along the Greenbelt are moderate along the length of the trail. However, there are areas where the east to west grade transition between Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive are significant, resulting in access grades that are challenging to a person with ambulatory disabilities.

Photo documentation and observations were completed for the length of the Greenbelt from Herondo Street to north city limits. Photo documentation is provided in Figure’s 1-A to 1-D below.
1252
GREENBELT FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 1A
HERONDO STREET to 8TH STREET

WORKOUT

STATION, BENCH,
WATER

FOUNTAIN,

TRASH CAN, PET

STATION

ACCESS POINT,

MONUMENT,

BENCH, TRASH
CAN

MIDBLOCK
ACCESS
1253
GREENBELT FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 1B
8 TH STREET to PIER AVENUE

MIDBLOCK
ACCESS

WORKOUT

STATION, WATER

FOUNTAIN,

TRASH CAN

EXISTING

ACCESSIBLE

PARKING
AREA

MIDBLOCK
ACCESS
1254
GREENBELT FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 1C
PIER AVENUE to GOULD AVENUE

MIDBLOCK
ACCESS

WORKOUT

STATION, WATER

FOUNTAIN, PET

STATION, TRASH
CAN

MIDBLOCK
ACCESS
W/RAMP

BENCHES

WORKOUT

STATION,
BENCH

BENCHES

WORKOUT

STATION, WATER

FOUNTAIN, PET

STATION, TRASH
CAN
1255
GREENBELT FEASIBILITY STUDY FIGURE 1D
PIER AVENUE to GOULD AVENUE
BENCH,

TRASH CAN
1256
10 | P a g e

5.0 ANALYSIS
Incorporating accessibility into the design of outdoor developed areas must begin early in the planning process, with careful consideration given to the route type, material selection, and location of accessible elements and the routes that connect them. It is recommended an emphasis be placed on ensuring that people with disabilities can access and use the variety of elements that serve the Greenbelt.

A. Route Type Selection
Determining the type of route is often a challenging exercise but necessary to determine the scope of the required improvements and associated slope requirements. The following details the technical requirements in accordance with the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Guidelines for Outdoor Developed area as well as the California State Parks Accessibility Guidelines that were evaluated in the selection of the most appropriate route type.

Accessible Routes—An accessible route is a continuous, unobstructed path that connects all accessible elements and spaces of a building or facility. Interior accessible routes may include corridors, floors, ramps, elevators, lifts, and clear floor space at fixtures. Exterior accessible routes may include accessible parking space access aisles, curb ramps, crosswalks at vehicular ways, walks, ramps, and platform lifts.

Pedestrian Access Routes—A pedestrian access route, often called a sidewalk, is located in a public right-of-way and typically is parallel to a roadway. Consequently, sidewalk grades (running slopes) must generally be consistent with roadway grades so that they fit into the right-of-way. Sidewalks are designed for pedestrian transportation and are not designed for bicycles or other recreational purposes.

Pedestrian Trails—A trail typically is not parallel to a roadway and is designed primarily for recreational purposes. Trails are not necessarily part of an infrastructure connecting elements or facilities, but typically are designed to provide a recreational experience.

Trails may also be used by multiple types of users, but most are not designed for bicycles, nor do they have a transportation purpose.

Outdoor Recreation Access Routes—An outdoor recreation access route (ORAR) is a continuous, unobstructed path that is intended for pedestrian use and that connects accessible elements, spaces, and facilities within camping and picnic facilities and at viewing areas and trailheads only. ORAR’s cannot be used at other types of facilities, such as educational campuses, office parks, or theme parks. 1257
11 | P a g e
Shared-Use Paths—A shared-use path is part of a transportation system in a public rightof-way that provides off-road routes for a variety of users. Even where the primary users may be bicyclists, skaters, or equestrians, shared-use paths typically are designed to serve pedestrians, including people using mobility devices such as manual or motorized wheelchairs. In addition to transportation uses, shared-use paths often provide recreational experiences. They may extend or complement a roadway network. For example, they may supplement on-road bike lanes, shared roadways, bike boulevards, and paved shoulders. Shared-use path design is similar to roadway design but on a smaller scale and for lower speeds. Whether located within a highway right-of-way, provided along a riverbank, or established over natural terrain within an independent rightof-way, shared-use paths differ from sidewalks and trails in that they are designed for a variety of users and serve both recreational and transportation purposes. Table 1 below is a quick reference to show the different route characteristics:

TABLE 1
Pedestrian Trail (Trail)
1258
12 | P a g e
The current use of the greenbelt would best be identified as a Pedestrian Trail (Trail).

A pedestrian trail is typically designed primarily for recreational purposes. Trails are not necessarily part of an infrastructure connecting elements or facilities, but typically are designed to provide a recreational experience. Trails may also be used by multiple types of users, but most are not designed for bicycles, nor do they have a transportation purpose. Table 2 below highlights the technical requirements for slope, width, and surface for different route types:

TABLE 2
1259
13 | P a g e
The pedestrian trail would require some re-grading to meet slope requirements. Grade transitions across the Greenbelt accommodate elevation differences which are, in places, significant given the hillside nature of the community. Thus, the means of access, particularly in mid-block locations, may be steep and non-compliant with respect to allowable grades for the paths of travel. The level of regrading would vary depending on the segment as slope conditions vary significantly throughout the greenbelt.

Pedestrian must have a minimum 36” width, but are recommended to be 6 feet to facilitate two-way travel.

B. Pathway Material
The most significant barrier to disabled access to the Greenbelt is the surfacing of the trail itself. Surfacing of disabled paths of travel shall be firm, stable and slip resistant. In order to maintain the natural look of the Greenbelt, the surface materials used for the accessible pedestrian trails may consist of natural stabilized decomposed granite (DG).

DG will need to stay fairly dry to ensure a firm and flat surface, which could be accomplished by ensuring that irrigation is properly adjusted to minimize watering the pathway surface.

C. Alternations and Valuation Threshold
The City has provided for incremental access improvements to the Greenbelt with construction of curb ramps and disabled access ramps at cross streets and some midblock points of access. Alterations to the Greenbelt facility, including facility elements such as surfacing, drinking fountains, exercise equipment, or parking, would trigger disabled accessible improvements to the area of alteration. Required improvements are prioritized by those actions that improve points of access, path of travel, and provide disabled accessible drinking fountains.

For any alterations within the Greenbelt that are not solely for purposes of providing accessibility access, 20% of the adjusted construction cost shall go to access compliance.

Adjusted construction cost is defined as “all costs directly related to the construction of a project, including labor, material, equipment, services, utilities, contractor financing, contractor overhead and profit, and construction management costs.” When the adjusted construction cost is less than or equal to the current valuation threshold, which is currently $186,172.00 (2022) the cost of compliance shall be limited to 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost. When the cost of full compliance would exceed 20 percent, compliance shall be provided to the greatest extent possible without 1260
14 | P a g e
exceeding 20 percent. When the adjusted construction cost exceeds the current valuation threshold, full compliance shall not be required.

D. Feasibility
Based on the field findings and research performed as a part of this feasibility study, it is the opinion of Access, Inc. that it is technically feasible for the City to provide a portion of, or the entire Greenbelt accessible, provided the requirements contained in this report are met.

Given the variability of the terrain along the Greenbelt, some segments would require more substantial regrading and construction to meet accessibility requirements. The City could consider the segment between Pier Avenue and 8th Street for an initial Pilot Study as it has flatter terrain and offers all the elements offered elsewhere along the Greenbelt.

The one element that sets this segment apart from the other segments along the Greenbelt is that it is served with a parking lot that has accessible parking spaces.

SWA Group, the City’s on-call landscape architect, provided the City with a conceptual design package to assist with the visualization of what an accessible pedestrian trail could look like along this segment of the Greenbelt. The graphics present three (3) concepts for a natural stabilized decomposed granite (DG) pedestrian trail. The concepts also detail options for edge treatments and coloration of the material. In addition to the illustrative materials, SWA Group provided rough order of magnitude cost estimates for the design and construction of the three conceptual options. Please find this information in Attachment B at the end of this report.

6.0 MAINTENANCE
To ensure the accessible pedestrian trail encourages and sustains a high level of use, it will be essential for it to be well-maintained. During the design and construction stages, elements such as surface type, drainage, and planting will need to be taken into consideration to help keep the route as low-maintenance as possible.

Regular inspections of the trail will identify what is required to keep the route safe and clear of any obstructions. Examples of the types of maintenance required to maintain the trail include, but not limited to; cutting back encroaching vegetation, trimming overhanging trees, sweeping or leaf blowing and litter picked up.
1261
15 | P a g e

7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
According to the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Guidelines for Outdoor Developed area as well as the California State Parks Accessibility Guidelines, the current use of the Greenbelt would best be identified as a Pedestrian Trail (Trail).

A pedestrian trail is typically designed primarily for recreational purposes. Trails are not necessarily part of an infrastructure connecting elements or facilities, but typically are designed to provide a recreational experience. Trails may also be used by multiple types of users, but most are not designed for bicycles, nor do they have a transportation purpose.

The existing grades along the above mentioned portion of the Greenbelt are moderate.

The addition of an accessible pedestrian trail should be able to be constructed with very little change to the existing grade elevations along the trail. There are however steeper grades at the mid-block access point where the running slope exceptions, outlined in Table 2 of this report, will need to be utilized to achieve a compliant route of travel at the access location.

The grade transitions across other areas of the Greenbelt have elevation differences which are, in places, significant given the hillside nature of the community. Thus, the means of access, particularly in mid-block locations, may be steep and non-compliant with respect to allowable grades for the paths of travel.

Based on the field findings and research performed as a part of this feasibility study, it is the opinion of Access, Inc. that it is technically feasible for the City to provide a portion of, or the entire Greenbelt accessible, provided the requirements contained in this report are met.

The most significant barrier to disabled access to the Greenbelt is the surfacing material used for the trail itself. Surfacing of disabled paths of travel shall be firm, stable and slip resistant. In order to maintain the natural look of the Greenbelt, the surface materials used for the accessible pedestrian trails may consist of natural stabilized decomposed granite (DG).

The ideal location for an initial pilot project was determined to be between Pier Avenue and 8th Street. This segment of the Greenbelt offers all the elements offered elsewhere along the Greenbelt (monument, workout station, benches, water fountain, etc.). The one element that sets this segment apart from the other segments along the Greenbelt is that it is served with a parking lot that has accessible parking spaces. The City’s on-call 1262
16 | P a g e
landscape architect SWA, provided the City with a conceptual design package to assist with the visualization of what an accessible pedestrian trail could look like along a portion of this segment of the Greenbelt from Pier to 11th Street to establish an initial pilot. The City could in the future add additional elements as discussed above or extend to 8th Street.

The visualizations includes 3 options and also details options for edge treatments and colorization of the DG material.

8.0 FINAL COMMENTS
The observations and recommendations contained herein should be considered the opinions of the Certified Access Specialist (CASp) working on behalf of Access, Inc., and based on a limited review. These observations do not purport to be either complete or exhaustive, but rather limited to what a visual survey and level measurements of the pedestrian trail would reasonably reveal.

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service in this effort. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact us at (949) 270-2775.

Respectfully submitted,
Matthew D. Steele, CASp #865
Principal Access Specialist
Attachments:

A. Improvements on the Greenbelt authored by City Attorney, Mr. Michael Jenkins, dated February 22, 2018
B. SWA Group Conceptual Designs, February 2022
1263

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP

A LAW PARTNERSHIP

MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CC: SERGIO GONZALEZ, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL JENKINS, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2018
RE: IMPROVEMENTS ON THE GREENBELT
This memorandum discusses whether material producing hardscape1 may be placed on the Hermosa Beach Greenbelt (“Greenbelt”) under the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to make the Greenbelt accessible to those in wheelchairs. This memorandum also discusses access laws (e.g., Americans with Disabilities Act) and whether City action is required to make the Greenbelt more accessible.

Introduction
The Greenbelt was developed in 1986 on an abandoned Santa Fe Railroad spur which once provided a rail connection between the Redondo Beach Wharf and downtown Los Angeles. Development of the Greenbelt as a recreational amenity commenced in the late 1980s. The City planted vegetation, installed workout stations, and added bark woodchips and mulch on the ground. As provided by contract, the City’s landscape contractors regularly recycle the citywide tree trimming into chips that are placed onto the Greenbelt, which is part of the City's program to reduce green waste. 1 For purposes of this memorandum, this type of surface, typically a decomposed compacted granite substance, will be referred to as hardscape.

ATTACHMENT A
1264

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 2
Analysis & Discussion
A. Code Permitted Improvements
The Greenbelt is zoned OS-1 RESTRICTED OPEN SPACE. The uses and improvements permitted in this zone are codified in Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (“HBMC”) §§ 17.32.020 & 17.32.030. HBMC §

17.32.020 (Permitted uses) states as follows:
“Those uses permitted in the O-S zone,2 except that no structure, building or improvement shall be developed, constructed or erected unless specifically authorized as a permitted improvement herein.” HBMC § 17.32.030 (Permitted improvements) provides as follows:
“Improvements permitted in the O-S-1 zone shall be as follows:

A. Only nonbuilding public improvements relating to landscaping, beautification, erosion control and irrigation improvements by the city which are consistent with or necessary to maintain and assure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreation purposes or relating to anti-seawater intrusion wells as an existing use; B. Improvements to only those two existing parking areas located within the greenbelt area across from Clark Stadium and City Hall consistent with or necessary to maintain and assure designated parking spaces, without expanding the existing parking area. Such improvements shall be of a nature and material designed to enhance and preserve the existing natural landscape.” (emphasis added) When read together, the uses permitted on the Greenbelt are as broad as those in the O-S zone; however, the physical improvements permitted on the Greenbelt are limited by § 17.32.030 to the improvements stated therein.

Thus, while pedestrian and bicycling walkways, by way of example, are 2 The uses permitted in the O-S zone are codified in HBMC § 17.30.020 and list 13 categories of uses (e.g., public parks, playgrounds, riding, bicycling and pedestrian walkways, transit uses, etc.) 1265

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 3
permitted uses of the Greenbelt (by virtue of the cross-reference to HBMC §

17.30.020), physical improvement of the Greenbelt is explicitly limited by HBMC § 17.32.030 (i.e., “relating to landscaping, beautification, erosion control and irrigation improvements by the city which are consistent with or necessary to maintain and assure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreation purposes”).

Chapter 17.32 was added to the HBMC by a vote of the electorate at the November 1989 municipal election, enacting Proposition “F” (adding Ordinance No. 89-1001 to the HBMC). Section 6 of Ordinance No. 89-1001 provides that “[T]here shall be no modification, amendment or repeal of any provision of this ordinance without a vote of the people.” Similarly, California Elections Code section 9217 provides that “[n]o ordinance that is either proposed by initiative petition and adopted by the vote of the legislative body of the city without submission to the voters, or adopted by the voters, shall be repealed or amended except by a vote of the people, unless provision is otherwise made in the original ordinance.” Hence, Section 17.32.030 can only be amended by a vote of the electorate.

The question of whether hardscape is permitted on the Greenbelt depends on whether hardscape is “landscaping” within the meaning of HBMC Section

17.32.030(A). Unfortunately, the Municipal Code does not define the word “landscaping,” and there is no dispositive definition of that word that would either include or exclude hardscape. Hence, in light of this ambiguity, it is necessary to consider extrinsic evidence to aid in the interpretation.

B. Intent of the Measure
The stated intent of Ordinance No. 89-1001 (adopted by Proposition F) was to preserve the Greenbelt “for parkland and open space purposes” as “an aesthetic oasis for all the people of the City of Hermosa Beach.” To the extent that it might assist with interpretation of the ordinance if the text is ambiguous or supports multiple interpretations, courts may turn to extrinsic sources such as ballot summaries and arguments in the ballot pamphlet for 1266

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 4
insight into the voters' intent. (Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court (2011) 51 Cal. 4th 310, 321.)
The ballot argument in favor of Proposition F (authored by three Councilmembers – Chuck Sheldon, Jim Rosenberger and June Williams) proposes that the Greenbelt be “forever a tranquil oasis” and further states, with reference to the parking area identified in Paragraph B of Section

17.32.030, the following:
“Forget visions of concrete and asphalt though, the ordinance specifically states that parking lot ‘improvements shall be of a nature and material designed to enhance and improve the existing natural landscape.’ We’re talking woodchips, gravel, railroad ties and grass crete.”
The debate between proponents and opponents of Proposition F appeared to focus on the existing parking area just south of City Hall and whether dogs should be leashed while on the Greenbelt. There is no direct discussion of the materials to be used on the Greenbelt aside from the discussion above pertaining to the parking area. Hence, the ballot materials are of little assistance in divining the intent of the voters in passing Proposition F as regards the surface of the Greenbelt itself.

C. Clarifying Language Elsewhere in the Hermosa Municipal Code The HBMC does not provide much in the way of guidance on what constitutes landscaping or beautification. In an unrelated provision of the HBMC, Chapter 8.60 (Efficient Landscaping) defines the term “Landscape area” as follows:
“"Landscape area" means the total area of the landscape project (planting areas, turf areas, and water features) in a landscape design plan . . . Landscape area includes "new construction landscape" and "rehabilitated landscape." Landscape area does not include footprints of buildings or structures, sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, decks, patios, gravel or stone walks, other pervious or impervious hardscapes, 1267

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 5
and other non-irrigated areas designated for non-development (e.g., open spaces and existing native vegetation).

The definition above excludes hardscape from a “landscape area.” The focused purpose of the water efficient landscape chapter is to minimize water waste; this narrow purpose limits the utility of this definition in other contexts.

HBMC § 17.36.020 (permitted uses in the Open-Space Overlay Zone) lists “Landscaping (hardscape/softscape)” as a permitted use, arguably leading to the opposite treatment of hardscape as landscaping than in the water efficient regulations. This explanatory qualifier of either hardscape of softscape, while absent from HBMC § 17.32.030(A), lends some support to treating hardscape as landscaping. However, the OS Overlay designation is only used for Strandfacing property sideyard improvements where parking areas and patios are permitted, a completely different context than the Greenbelt. At bottom, nothing in the HBMC offers definitive guidance as to the meaning of “landscape” and “hardscape” for purposes of Section 17.32.030.

D. Dictionary Definitions
Various dictionary definitions also fail to provide much guidance.

Landscaping is defined as (i) “the process of making a yard or other piece of land more attractive by altering the existing design, adding ornamental features, and planting trees and shrubs;”(ii)
“to improve the appearance of (an area of land, a highway, etc.), as by planting trees, shrubs, or grass, or altering the contours of the ground;” and (iii) “features such as trees, stones, etc. that have been added to make a piece of land more attractive; land that has been made more attractive in this way.” These definitions do not appear to indicate that only living features (grass, shrubs, plants, etc.) qualify as landscaping.3 See Oxford Learner’s Dictionary
(http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/landsca ping); http://www.dictionary.com/browse/landscape.
3 Under these definitions, the bark woodchips and mulch added to the Greenbelt may not qualify as landscaping.
1268

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 6
E. The City’s Application of this Language in Other Contexts Noble Park, which is zoned OS-2 RESTRICTED OPEN SPACE, is subject to an almost identical improvement restriction.
4 Its paths consist of decomposed
granite (which we have defined as “hardscape”); there is no evidence revealing whether the landscape-only restriction in the OS-2 zone was considered when the paths were installed.

F. Common Sense Reading of the Ordinance
Courts hold that ordinances should be given a common sense interpretation; in other words, that when reading an ordinance, a court will avoid a reading that has absurd results. See Wotton v. Bush (1953) 41 Cal. 2d 460, 467; Granberry v. Islay Inv. (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 382, 388 (statute should be interpreted to produce a result that is reasonable and to avoid absurd result).

It is reasonable from a policy point of view that a non-building improvement that advances or facilitates a permitted use of the Greenbelt could be allowed.

Section 17.32.020 expressly allows all of the uses enumerated in Section

17.30.020, which include “[r]iding, bicycling and hiking trails and pedestrian ways.”
Alternatively, the intent of Section 17.32.030 was to preserve the Greenbelt in as natural a state as possible, thereby allowing riding, bicycling and hiking/walking on the natural surface of the ground, but precluding the addition of materials that would create a road-like surface and fundamentally alter its character.
5 A relevant consideration in the common sense interpretation of Section

17.32.030 is the compatibility of uses on the Greenbelt. The placement of decomposed granite or similar hardscape surface on all or substantially all of the Greenbelt will not just make the Greenbelt accessible to the disabled but 4 Only non-building public improvements relating to landscaping, beautification: grass, trees, flowers, plants, soil, unobtrusive park lighting, some benches to view the ocean, existing public utilities, one flag pole for the American Flag, and erosion and irrigation improvements to assure permanent open space for park purposes shall be permitted.
5 Such a limitation, aggravated by the addition of woodchips, creates a barrier to use of the Greenbelt by some people with disabilities.
1269

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 7
will also facilitate cycling, roller skating/blading and similar recreational activities, all of which are permitted on the Greenbelt by virtue of Section

17.32.020.
6 These are not necessarily compatible activities on a single path of travel. Attempting to create a safe multi-modal hard surface pathway with adequate separation of cyclists from pedestrians and including specifications to accommodate disabled users would require modification of the existing vegetation protected by Ordinance No. 89-1001 to preserve the Greenbelt in a relatively natural state as a tranquil “aesthetic oasis.” Proposition F was not intended to convert the Greenbelt into a regional bicycle path; hence, if decomposed granite were to be placed on the surface, it would have to be accomplished in a manner that preserves the Greenbelt as a tranquil, safe, vegetated open space environment.

G. Role of the City Council Interpreting City Ordinances Ultimately, interpretations of the Zoning Ordinance rest with the City Council.

City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Bd. (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 951, 962. The City Council’s interpretation of its own laws is given deference by the courts and will be upheld if not manifestly unreasonable. Robinson v, City of Yucaipa (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 1506 (“construction of the law need not be the only reasonable interpretation, and its application of the law will be upheld unless it is arbitrary, capricious, lacks any rational basis, or disregards the plain meaning of the ordinance”). Increasing the accessibility of the Greenbelt is one plausible basis for the Council to conclude that limited hardscape is consistent with the limitation on improvements on the Greenbelt so long as it does not alter the fundamental character-defining attributes of the facility.

H. Accessibility Requirements
The City engaged the firm of M6 Consulting to analyze the accessibility of the Greenbelt. That analysis concludes that the grade transitions (i.e. slopes) in certain (but not all) locations hinder entry to and exit from the Greenbelt by disabled persons. Further, the analysis concludes that the surface of the Greenbelt (consisting of wood chips and mulch) is not sufficiently firm, stable 6 Those activities cannot be banned from the Greenbelt without passage of an ordinance by the electorate.
1270

JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP
FEBRUARY 22, 2018
PAGE 8
or slip resistant to qualify as accessible to the disabled under regulatory standards.

The City is subject to the disabled access provisions of the 2010 federal Americans with Disabilities Act and related provisions of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, the intent of which is to eliminate barriers to access to public facilities. A city’s duty to eliminate barriers arises only in the event alterations are made to the facility. Thus, the City has no legal obligation to improve the accessibility of the Greenbelt unless it undertakes a project to alter or modify it. See United States Access Board’s (federal agency responsible for developing accessibility guidelines for the construction and alteration of facilities covered by the ADA) Guidelines and Standards for Trails (https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/recreationfacilities/outdoor-developed-areas/background/committee-report/trails); see also 28 CFR §35.150.

As of the date of this Memorandum, there are no applicable guidelines for trail facilities like the Greenbelt. The United States Access Board has indicated that it will develop guidelines potentially applicable to non-federally owned sites like the Greenbelt at some time in the future.7
Conclusion
In sum, the City may only improve the Greenbelt with a hardscape pathway if it finds that the path is landscaping consistent with the open space designation. One benefit of hardscape might be that it increases accessibility of the Greenbelt. The City is not obligated by State or federal law to undertake such improvements unless the City is making other improvements.

However, there currently are no standards to determine what improvements would achieve a level of accessibility to comply with the ADA. 7 https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/recreation-facilities/outdoor-developedareas 1271
Greenbelt Accessibility Path
City of Hermosa Beach
Pier Ave to 11th St
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
March 01, 2022

ATTACHMENT B
1272
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.2

1. Site Location

2. Project Overview

3. Design Alternatives
AGENDA
1273
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.3
Site Location

STUDY AREA
Greenbelt
Valley Drive
Ardmore Drive
Pacific Coast Hwy
Hermosa Ave
Hermosa
Beach Pier
Aviation Blvd
Pier Ave
N
1274
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.4
Existing Condition
Project Overview
Valley Drive
11th St.
11th St.

Pier Ave
Ardmore Ave
City Library USPS
Hermosa
Tennis Court
Study Area

GREENBELT TRAIL
N

1. Pier Ave & Valley Drive Entry 2. Greenbelt Trail 3. 11th Street Entry 1 2
3 9/11 Memorial
1275
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.5
Accessibility Upgrade
Legend
Project Overview
Valley Drive
11th St.
11th St.

Pier Ave
Ardmore Ave Study Area

GREENBELT TRAIL
N
Accessible Trail
(Decomposed Granite)
Trail Marker Hermosa Beach
9/11 Memorial
Accessible Bench
with Companion Seat
Accessible Parking
1276
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.02.03 P.6
Nature Trail
Palos Verdes Estates
SeascapeTrail
Rancho Palos Verdes
Nature Trail
Rancho Palos Verdes
TerraneaTrail
Rancho Palos Verdes
Project Overview
South BayPrecedents
1277
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.7
Decomposed Granite
Edge Conditions
Project Overview
Natural Edge
Jeffrey Open Space Trail
1278
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.8
Planting Area Existing Woodchip Path Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Existing 12’ Woodchip Path Planting Area Plan Section
Existing Condition
Project Overview
1279
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.9
Planting Area Proposed DG Path Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 12’ Proposed DG Path Planting Area Plan Section
Option 1: Replace entire path with decomposed granite.

Design Alternative
1280
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.10
Planting Area Existing Wood Chip Path Planting Area
Proposed DG Path
6’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area Plan
Section
Option 2: Combine wood chip and decomposed granite path.

Design Alternative
1281
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.11
Planting Area Existing Wood Chip Path Planting Area Proposed DG Path 12’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area Plan
Section
Option 3: Separate decomposed granite path.

Design Alternative
1282
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.12
12’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 12’ Proposed DG Path Planting Area 6’ Existing Wood
Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Design Alternatives
Pros and Cons
Option 1
PROS
• Lowest maintenance
• Seamless Access
• Provides choice of material
within existing path
cross-section
• Dedicated path
• Retains existing woodchip path
• Reduces potential conflicts with
existing path
CONS
• Removes wood chips
• Minor modifications required to
existing irrigation and planting
• Signficant maintenance due to
mixing of materials
• Would require a fixed header -
potential tripping hazard
• Minor modifications required to
existing irrigation and planting
• May increase conflicts between
passing users
• Highest cost
• Some plant and tree removal
• Equal Access would require
additional tertiary paths to points
of interest
• May not be feasible for entire
greenbelt - requires additional
study.

Option 2
Option 3
1283
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.13
12’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 12’ Proposed DG Path Planting Area 6’ Existing Wood
Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Design Alternatives
ROM Costs
Option 1
Total Project Cost:

Total Project Cost:

Total Project Cost:
$268,250
$269,750
$401,250
Total Construction Cost:

Total Design Cost:

Total Construction Cost:

Total Design Cost:

Total Construction Cost:

Total Design Cost:
$205,000
$63,250
$195,000
$74,750
$315,000
$86,250
Option 2
Option 3
1284
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.14
Thank You
Any Questions?
1285

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Study Session 03.31.22 1286
Agenda.
 Hermosa Beach ADA Efforts
 Greenbelt Feasibility Study for ADA
Accessibility
 ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan
01 02
03 1287

HERMOSA BEACH ADA
EFFORTS 01
1288

ADA PROGRAMMATIC

EFFORTS
The City continues to commit its efforts and
resources to improve accessibility.
• Dedicated Certified Access Specialist (CASp)
consultant and ADA coordinator.
• Established a City’s ADA grievance process.
• Finalizing City’s ADA Self Evaluation and
Transition Plan.
1289

ADA PROJECT EFFORTS
The City continues to incorporates ADA
improvements in a variety of City projects and
private developments.
1290

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

MONTHLY STATUS REPORT
1291

RECENTLY COMPLETED

PROJECTS WITH ADA

IMPROVEMENTS
• CIP 186 & 190
Annual Street
Improvements
• CIP 192 Annual
Striping
Improvements
• Temporary Downtown
Lane Reconfiguration
• Friends of the Library
1292
CIP 186 & 190 ANNUAL

STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Constructed 38 curb ramps and 200 feet of sidewalk.
1293
CIP 192 ANNUAL STRIPING

IMPROVEMENTS
Installed and updated 14 ADA parking spaces.
1294

DOWNTOWN HERMOSA

BEACH TEMPORARY

LANE RECONFIGURATIONS
Installed 8 new on-street ADA parking spaces.
1295

FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY
Constructed new ramps for the Community Center
and Friends of the Library.
1296

ACTIVE PROJECTS WITH

ADA IMPROVEMENTS
• CIP 102 Bus Stops Improvements
• CIP 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project
• CIP 191 Annual Street Improvements
• CIP 194 Annual Striping Improvements
• CIP 195 City Sidewalk Improvements
• CIP 601 & 698 Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps
• CIP 669 City Park Restrooms and Renovation
• CIP 689 Clark Building Renovations
• CIP 699 Parking Structure (Lot C)
Improvements
• CIP 549 Temporary Beach Accessible Routes
• STUDY 544 Greenbelt Accessible Path
Assessment
1297
CIP 102

BUS STOPS

IMPROVEMENTS
These improvements will include ADA
accessible curb ramps, concrete bus pads,
crosswalk, striping improvements, furnishing,
and other general improvements within direct
vicinity of the bus stops.

Status: Preliminary Design
1298
CIP 143

PCH MOBILITY

IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT
Improvements will include ADA components to
be determined during design.

Status: Study/Conceptual Planning
1299
CIP 191

ANNUAL STREET

IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements will include ADA components to
be determined during design
Status: Preliminary Design
1300
CIP 194
ANNUAL

STRIPING

IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements will include ADA components to
be determined during design.

Status: Preliminary Design
1301
CIP 195

CITY SIDEWALK

IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements will increase sidewalk
accessibility and address tripping
Status: Final Engineering Design
1302
CIP 601 & 698

PROSPECT
AVENUE

CURB RAMPS
Reconstruction of 12 curb ramps to be ADA
compliant.

Status: Project Approvals/Bidding
1303
CIP 669

CITY PARK

RESTROOMS
AND

RENOVATION
Constructing new and renovated restrooms
which all will be ADA compliant.

Status: Construction
1304
CIP 689
CLARK

BUILDING

RENOVATIONS
Renovations will bring the Clark Building to
ADA standards along with new access ramps.

Status: Final Engineering Design
1305
CIP 699

PARKING

STRUCTURE
(LOT C)

IMPROVEMENTS
Replacement of the parking structure elevator
and other ADA improvements.

Status: Final Engineering Design
1306
CIP 549

TEMPORARY
BEACH

ACCESSIBLE
ROUTES
Expanded the pilot program to include access
routes at 2nd St, 11th St, and 22nd St.

Use of new Mobi-Mat material and other ADA
improvements to be made.

Status: Mats deployed / Approvals
1307

FUTURE PROJECTS WITH

ADA IMPROVEMENTS
• CIP 188 Strand Bikeway and
Walkway Improvements at 35th
Street
• CIP 604 City Wide ADA
Improvements
• CIP 682 Parking Lot D
Improvements
• CIP 692 14th Street Beach
Restroom Rehabilitation
• CIP 695 Parking Lot A
Improvements
• STUDY 101 Hermosa Avenue
Greenwich Village Street
Realignment
1308
CIP 604 CITY WIDE ADA

IMPROVEMENTS
Provides improvements city wide in order to comply with ADA standards along with the City's Transition Plan being developed.

Design pending staff availability
1309
CIP 682 PARKING LOT D

IMPROVEMENTS
Project will include new ADA ramp to the parking lot and new ADA parking spots.

Awaiting funding
1310
CIP 692 14TH STREET BEACH

RESTROOM REHABILITATION
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.

Design pending staff availability
1311
CIP 695 PARKING LOT A

IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.

Design pending staff availability
1312
STUDY 101 HERMOSA AVENUE

GREENWICH VILLAGE STREET

REALIGNMENT
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.

Conceptual Design (part of Study 103 – Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment) 1313
CIP 188 STRAND BIKEWAY AND WALKWAY
IMPROVEMENTS AT 35TH STREET
The project will consider the addition of a dedicated ADA path to provide greater ADA accessibility to The Strand.

Conceptual Design (part of Study 103 – Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment) 1314

GREENBELT FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY 02
1315

BACKGROUND
• Greenbelt was once a railroad and converted
into a restricted open space in 1986.
• In 2018, Greenbelt accessibility was brought
to Council.
• Council directed staff to investigate the option
of an accessible path on the Greenbelt.
• Study 544 was created to look at high level
feasibility of making the Greenbelt more
accessible.
1316

STANDARDS USED FOR

ANALYSIS
• 2014 Architectural Barriers Act (ABA)
Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas
• 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Standards for Accessible Designs
1317

OBSERVATIONS
1318

ROUTE TYPE SELECTION
Requirements and
Criteria:
• Running slopes
• Cross slope
• Use of trail
1319

ROUTE TYPE SELECTION
Requirements and
Criteria:
• Running slopes
• Cross slope
• Use of trail
1320

PATHWAY MATERIAL

REQUIREMENTS
• Firm, stable, and slip resistant.
• Maintain the natural look of the Greenbelt.
• Recommend stabilized decomposed granite
(DG) as path material.
1321

MAINTENANCE
• New accessible pedestrian trail will require
increased maintenance.
• Maintain drainage and grading of DG path to
keep dry.
• Trimming of encroaching tree branches and
vegetation out of the path.
1322

FEASIBILITY
• An accessible path is feasible anywhere on
the Greenbelt .
• Some locations provide more challenges than
others.
• The section of Greenbelt between Pier and
11th St was found to be the ideal location to
implement a pilot path.
1323

PATH CONCEPTS
• Landscape Architect SWA provided visuals
and conceptual options for pilot segment.
1324
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.3
Site Location

STUDY AREA
Greenbelt
Valley Drive
Ardmore Drive
Pacific Coast Hwy
Hermosa Ave
Hermosa
Beach Pier
Aviation Blvd
Pier Ave
N
1325
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.4
Existing Condition
Project Overview
Valley Drive
11th St.
11th St.

Pier Ave
Ardmore Ave
City Library USPS
Hermosa
Tennis Court
Study Area

GREENBELT TRAIL
N

1. Pier Ave & Valley Drive Entry 2. Greenbelt Trail 3. 11th Street Entry 1 2
3 9/11 Memorial
1326
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.5
Accessibility Upgrade
Legend
Project Overview
Valley Drive
11th St.
11th St.

Pier Ave
Ardmore Ave Study Area

GREENBELT TRAIL
N
Accessible Trail
(Decomposed Granite)
Trail Marker Hermosa Beach
9/11 Memorial
Accessible Bench
with Companion Seat
Accessible Parking
1327
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.02.03 P.6
Nature Trail
Palos Verdes Estates
SeascapeTrail
Rancho Palos Verdes
Nature Trail
Rancho Palos Verdes
TerraneaTrail
Rancho Palos Verdes
Project Overview
South BayPrecedents
1328
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.7
Decomposed Granite
Edge Conditions
Project Overview
Natural Edge
Jeffrey Open Space Trail
1329
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.8
Planting Area Existing Woodchip Path Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Existing 12’ Woodchip Path Planting Area Plan Section
Existing Condition
Project Overview
1330
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.9
Planting Area Proposed DG Path Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 12’ Proposed DG Path Planting Area Plan Section
Option 1: Replace entire path with decomposed granite.

Design Alternative
1331
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.10
Planting Area Existing Wood Chip Path Planting Area
Proposed DG Path
6’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area Plan
Section
Option 2: Combine wood chip and decomposed granite path.

Design Alternative
1332
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.11
Planting Area Existing Wood Chip Path Planting Area Proposed DG Path 12’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area Plan
Section
Option 3: Separate decomposed granite path.

Design Alternative
1333
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.12
12’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 12’ Proposed DG Path Planting Area 6’ Existing Wood
Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Design Alternatives
Pros and Cons
Option 1
PROS
• Lowest maintenance
• Seamless Access
• Provides choice of material
within existing path
cross-section
• Dedicated path
• Retains existing woodchip path
• Reduces potential conflicts with
existing path
CONS
• Removes wood chips
• Minor modifications required to
existing irrigation and planting
• Signficant maintenance due to
mixing of materials
• Would require a fixed header -
potential tripping hazard
• Minor modifications required to
existing irrigation and planting
• May increase conflicts between
passing users
• Highest cost
• Some plant and tree removal
• Equal Access would require
additional tertiary paths to points
of interest
• May not be feasible for entire
greenbelt - requires additional
study.

Option 2
Option 3
1334
Greenbelt Accessibility Path 2022.03.01 P.13
12’ Existing
Wood Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 12’ Proposed DG Path Planting Area 6’ Existing Wood
Chip Path
Ardmore Ave Planting Area 6’ Proposed
DG Path
Planting Area
Design Alternatives
ROM Costs
Option 1
Total Project Cost:

Total Project Cost:

Total Project Cost:
$268,250
$269,750
$401,250
Total Construction Cost:

Total Design Cost:

Total Construction Cost:

Total Design Cost:

Total Construction Cost:

Total Design Cost:
$205,000
$63,250
$195,000
$74,750
$315,000
$86,250
Option 2
Option 3
1335

COUNCIL

CONSIDERATIONS
• Decomposed granite is a natural material that
is best suited for an accessible pedestrian trail
on the Greenbelt and is considered as
landscaping and compliant with zoning codes
and ordinances.
• Extent of the accessible pedestrian trail from
Pier Ave to 11th St.
• Selection of Design Alternatives Options 1, 2,
or 3 for the accessible pedestrian trail.
1336

ADA SELF EVALUATION AND
TRANSITION PLAN 03
1337

PROGRAM

ACCESSIBILITY
• Services, programs, or activities, when
viewed in their entirety, must be readily
accessible.
• This is known as “Program Accessibility”.
• The ADA Self Evaluation and Transition
Plan are living documents that assist the
City to achieve Program Accessibility.
1338

ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUIREMENTS • Preparation of an ADA Self-Evaluation. • Develop a grievance procedure. • Designate an individual to oversee Title II of American Disability Act compliance
(e.g., an ADA coordinator).
• Develop a Transition Plan if structural
changes are necessary for achieving
program accessibility.
1339

PHASE OF ACCESS COMPLIANCE
Phase Description
I: Commitment Designation of an employee as the ADA Coordinator, notice to the public of how Title II applies to the public entity, adoption of an ADA Grievance procedure, and hiring of a Certified Access Specialist (CASp).

II: Self Evaluation Completion of a Self Evaluation (programs, services and activities) and Transition Plan (physical barriers).

III: Transition Prepare a budget and correction plan to advance the findings in the Self Evaluation and Transition Plan.

IV: Implementation This phase achieves the goals established in the self-evaluation and transition plan.

V. Ongoing Support Maintenance and quality control - includes such steps as a final report on compliance status, periodic evaluations of compliance status, scheduled maintenance of access features, resolution of access issues as they arise, and ensuring new facilities, alterations, and repairs are ADA-compliant. 1340

PHASE OF ACCESS COMPLIANCE
Phase Status Steps Taken Actions Required/Recommended
I: Commitment Ongoing Designated ADA Coordinator, grievance procedures in place, and CASp consultant
hired.

Provide public notice of applicable ADA
requirements and maintain commitment to
access compliance.

II: Self Evaluation Ongoing ADA inspection reports completed for (1) main public buildings; (2) main parking lots
and on-street parking segments; and (3)
sidewalks and curb ramps.

Update existing ADA reports; complete selfevaluation of remaining programs, services, and facilities; and review every 3-4 years.

III: Transition Ongoing 2022 Transition Plan has been prepared. Incorporate updated ADA reports, selfevaluation of remaining programs, services, and facilities into Plan, and review every 3-4 years.

IV: Implementation Ongoing Not yet applicable; City will complete 2022 Transition Plan goals according to
recommendations/implementation schedule.

Update the implementation dates in the ADA
reports and Transition Plan as budget and
priority dictates.

V. Ongoing Support Ongoing City has grievance procedure; public works projects meet CBC and ADA regulations; in
regular contact with its CASp.

Provide periodic assessment related to the
proper maintenance of all access features.
1341
2022 TRANSITION PLAN
• Identifies physical barriers that exist at City facilities. • Compilation of ADA facility evaluation reports including. parking lots.
• Contains updated cost estimates.
• Identifies priorities.
1342

ADA EVALUATION

REPORTS

1. Parking Structure

2. Clark Building

3. Valley Park Building

4. Kiwanis Shared Building Exterior
Access & Parking

5. Kiwanis

6. Rotary Club
1343

ADA EVALUATION

REPORTS

7. Fire Department

8. Police Department

9. City Hall

10. Civic Center Exterior

11. City Yard

12. Base 3

13. South Park 1344

ADA EVALUATION

REPORTS

14. Community Center & Theatre

15. City of Hermosa Beach Citywide
Disabled Parking

16. Hermosa Beach On-Street Disabled
Parking

17. Citywide Building and Facilities
Condition Assessment CIP 13-664
ADA Sidewalks and Curb Ramps
Evaluation 1345

COST ESTIMATING
Category Cost
Building Facilities $1,150,500
Off-Street Disable Parking $850,000
On-Street Disable Parking $52,500
City Sidewalk and Ramps $43,000,000
Total $45,053,000
1346

PRIORITY SETTING
Category Basis of Priority
Building Facilities Based on highest needs, safety, programmatic requirements, and funding availability.

Off-Street Disable Parking
Must maintain compliance or provide alternatives that
provide equal access.

On-Street Disable Parking Per recommended guidelines Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG).

City Sidewalk and Ramps Based on highest needs, safety, and funding availability, and safe routes to school.
1347

CURRENT FUNDING

1. Hermosa Beach's FY21-22 CIP Budget: $19,546,905

2. $662,000 dedicated to address ADA issues:
• $130,000 ADA consulting
• $284,000 Curb ramp/sidewalk improvements
• $128,000 Beach Access Path
• $72,000 Clark Building
• $48,000 Parking space/lot improvements
1348

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Facility Name Facility Type
Year
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 2036-2040 2041-2045 2046-2050 2051-2055 2056-2060 2061-2065 2066-2070 2071-2075 2076-2080 Parking Structure Building
Clark Building Building
Valley Park Building Building
Kiwani's Building Shared Exterior Building
Kiwanis South Building
Kiwanis North Building
Fire Department Building
Police Department Building
City Hall Building Building
Civic Center Exterior Buildng
City Yard Building
Base 3 Building Building
South Park Building Building
Community Center & Theatre Building
City Parks Parks
Citywide Disabled Parking (Parking Lots) Parking
Citywide On-Street Disabled Parking Parking
Citywide Sidewalk & Curb Ramps Right-of-Way
1349

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Evaluation Report and Code Updates - As projects are created the design shall include the current codes that are applicable at the time of design.

2. Self-evaluation - (1) employment policies and practices, (2) notice to the public of ADA requirements, (3) website accessibility, (4) temporary event permits and (5) Emergency Operations Center and on-scene operations.

3. Programs, Services and Activities - Continue to evaluate the City’s programs, services and activities to ensure compliance.

4. Other City Facilities - Additional ADA assessments are required for City facilities that are not detailed in this 2022 ADA Transition Plan. 1350

RECOMMENDATIONS

5. Commitment - Provide public notice of ADA requirements applicable to City and maintain commitment to access compliance.

6. Funding – FY 2021-2022 budget dedicated funds for ADA consulting services and Capital Improvement Projects. City should continue to dedicate funds as they are available.

7. Implementation - Update the implementation dates in the ADA reports and Transition Plan Schedule as budget and priority dictates.

8. On-going Maintenance Assessment - Periodic assessment related to the proper maintenance of all accessible features is required. 1351
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 5:46 PM
To: Ann Yang <[email protected]>
Subject: New eComment for City Council Adjourned Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session) New eComment for City Council Adjourned
Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session)
Geoff Hirsch submitted a new eComment.

Meeting: City Council Adjourned Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session) Item: a. REPORT 22-0173 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) STUDY SESSION (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
eComment: I support the installation of an accessible pathway on the Greenbelt as a trial project to determine if this is feasible for a longer span. It has now been over six years that we have been discussing this project back-and-forth, weighing the pros and cons, hiring not only a landscape consultant but an accessibility evaluator. Both of their reports suggested that a trial pathway of approximately four blocks be installed to allow for a proper study of this project’s feasibility. It is important City Council specify some evaluation criteria for this project; specifically, durability of the material, what maintenance is required, overall stability of the surface, and ease of use for wheelchairs and strollers. I believe that an adequate evaluation. period would be anywhere from nine months to one year, this would allow for an adequate trial under varying weather conditions. Hopefully, this project could then be approved as a CIP Project during the next fiscal year. Please give this necessary project the consideration it deserves and approve this trial. Making a Greenbelt accessible is not a privilege, it is a citizens right, both from a moral snd legal perspective. Thank you,
1352
From: Geoff Hi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:23 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Cc: Ann Yang <[email protected]>; isabel rodriguez
<[email protected]>
Subject: Accessible pathway on Greenbelt
Good evening,
I am writing this letter on behalf of Isabel Rodriguez who is very sick and is going in for an operation later this week. She has asked me to convey the following to you:
“The Greenbelt is in a sense a park and therefore must be accessible. To deny even one citizen access to this jewel is beyond cruel. This open space must be made accessible to all people, regardless of their physical challenges.

The wood chips are very hard to navigate for anyone with any kind of mobility issues:
knee/hip problems, parents with strollers, those in wheelchairs, etc. The time has come to open up the Greenbelt to everyone, any other action is not only cruel, it is actually illegal.

Please do the right thing and make the Greenbelt accessible to all.” Thank you,
Isabel Rodriguez (written by Geoff Hirsch)
1353
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 7:09 PM
To: Ann Yang <[email protected]>
Subject: New eComment for City Council Adjourned Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session) New eComment for City Council Adjourned
Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session)
Dency Nelson submitted a new eComment.

Meeting: City Council Adjourned Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session) Item: a. REPORT 22-0173 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) STUDY SESSION (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
eComment: I support the installation of an accessible pathway on the greenbelt as a trial. After all of the years we've spent talking about it, the only way we will know exactly what it is, if it works for the folks who need it, and to demonstrate to those who oppose it that it isn't the travesty they think it will be, is to put it out there for a period of time for all to see and to use. I also believe the trial has to be the originally suggested four blocks long, and not just one block, as I believe it's the only way to give it a real test. In addition to those comments, and comments I have made previously in support of the disabled folks who are in wheelchairs and the elderly or disabled who use walkers or canes who believe the suggested decomposed granite will provide them the access to the Greenbelt they have otherwise been denied, I would like to add one other thought. I am not disabled in any way, but like many in our community, I spend most of my days not wearing shoes, but walking our streets in sandles. It's Hermosa Beach after all, and that's what a lot of us wear a lot of the time if not all of the time. I avoid the Greenbelt because the woodchips are not sandle-friendly! Very uncomfortable to walk the Greenbelt in sandles. I know that I would be very much more inclined to walk the beautiful Greenbelt and enjoy its solitude if I could walk on a surface like decomposed granite that I have experience in many parks and coastal pathways. It is as "natural" a surface as woodchips and appropriate for the natural setting that we cherish that is the Greenbelt, but a much more comfortable surface for walking, or running for that matter, than woodchips. Let's give it a try and once and for all deal with this dilemma.
1354
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 2:06 PM
To: Ann Yang <[email protected]>
Subject: New eComment for City Council Adjourned Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session) New eComment for City Council Adjourned
Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session)
Karen Klink submitted a new eComment.

Meeting: City Council Adjourned Regular Hybrid Meeting (ADA Study Session) Item: a. REPORT 22-0173 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) STUDY SESSION (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
eComment: I support the installation of an accessible pathway on the greenbelt as a trial. I supported it a long time ago. What I don't understand is why our attorney's can't make it clear that there wouldn't be an avenue for people to sue the city for going forward (hardscape). It seems we (the city would have a clear understanding of this by now (before going forward). That they would explain this to all interested parties, which they have not done. They also haven't explained to all interested parties the chance of being sued by ADA or someone in a wheelchair.

If the city gets this out of the way, it will less confusing to residents. The arguments made by residents about bikes and ebikes and shopping carts are absolutely absurd. So we should penalize the disabled because others break the law? or because Hermosa might not be able to enforce the law? That is absolutely incorrect. These people are also not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts because they are concerned for the people in the wheelchairs. They are worried, it will affect them! I have a Mom that uses a walker and a nephew in a wheelchair, they take walks on the strand all the time, why the heck now the Greenbelt? Decomposed Granite on the side of the woodchips is not going to destroy "the vision" for the Greenbelt. Are people afraid that the disabled will?
1355
Access Hermosa Working Group
To: Hermosa Beach City Council
RE: Green Belt Accessible Path
Since our formation by then City Manager, Tom Bakaly, in 2017, we have been working to assist the city on this and several other accessibility issues.

We thank the City Council, City Manager, and Public
Works Director and Commission for moving forward on
this item. Together, we have come so far and we are
excited and hopeful that you will cross the finish line and provide an accessible path on the greenbelt. Over
time, there have been some objections raised when
discussing this proposal, and we want to first address
those objections.
“Don’t pave the Greenbelt” “It’s not natural”- When
the City first obtained this right of way, there were no wood chips, in fact there was no path at all. Wood
chips are not indigenous to the Greenbelt. They are
artificially, periodically dumped and spread out,
probably to keep weeds, dust, and mud to a minimum. It is a loose, uneven, dangerous surface to walk and especially to run on. Decomposed granite is a naturally occurring substance, and when used in this application, can look and feel as natural as a dirt trail, while providing safe accessibility for all the citizens of Hermosa. Walkers, joggers, dogs, mothers with baby carriages, toddlers, and the elderly can all access the beauty and serenity of the Greenbelt. It is currently used in other parks in Hermosa without controversy. D/G isn’t paving, concrete, or artificial. “It will encourage homeless encampments”- There are already homeless people on the Greenbelt and we don’t think a short test trail will encourage more. In fact, just the opposite, sleeping outdoors would be far more comfortable on soft woodchips than on a hard packed trail. Homelessness is a separate issue, and while it should be addressed, it really doesn’t belong in this conversation.
“Let’s get special wheelchairs” This sounds reasonable, and maybe it would work, but there are logistic problems with this. What do they cost, where to store them, how to 1356
assist people in and out of them, how to prevent someone from accidentally sliding down some of the hilly areas, etc.
“It will encourage bicycles and motorized bikes”- There are already both on the Greenbelt. Whether or not they are legal, we feel they shouldn’t be on the greenbelt.

The greenbelt was meant as a pedestrian path. Not a Motocross track. Jumping off the small hills and sliding in loose wood chips is currently much more exciting than riding along on a flat hard surface. There are more than enough places for these vehicles elsewhere, especially motorized bikes. We feel this should be the case regardless of this project.
“Why does this keep coming up?”- It keeps coming up because it’s the right thing to do.

Why should we selfishly limit the use of this beautiful part of our City to able-bodied people only? Our City Government has wisely and kindly come to this conclusion on the beach with 3 mobile paths. Why should the Greenbelt be any different? Someday, almost all of us may have some kind of mobility problem. Perhaps a knee, or back, stroke, arthritis, or just from aging. If and when that day comes, don’t you want to be able to enjoy the Greenbelt along with everyone else? Don’t you want to be able to take a walk among the trees alongside your grandchildren and not wave to them from a separate path or sidewalk?
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

These are our reasons why we should have an accessible path. The following is our opinion on how.

Of the three options presented by the Consultant and Architect, we feel Option #1 is best. The other options are more expensive and have the following drawbacks.

Option #2 – Requires mixing wood chips and D/G side by side.

This presents a maintenance problem. Wood chips would need to be periodically replenished. Also, wood chips will spill over onto the D/G even with a header and would periodically need sweeping to avoid a tripping hazard. Construction and maintenance make this option more expensive.

Option #3 - Requires removing existing trees and plants and grading a new path on a sloped area, instead of using the current path area. Removing trees and plants and replacing them with another path, seems to be going backwards and is something no one wants. Also, this is exclusionary. Having an equal but separate path off to the side of the existing path is unfair and wrong. Construction and maintenance also make this option more expensive.
1357
Option #1 – Replacing the center path with decomposed granite is the most natural looking option and is the least expensive. D/G is permeable and would keep mud and puddling to a minimum. Water runoff would be natural and conserving. From the pictures in the staff report, it would blend into the Greenbelt in the least impactful way.

The planting on the sides could grow in a meandering way over the edges and not cause additional maintenance.

Finally, the Consultant and Architect originally suggested going all the way to 8th Street with the test path. We agree with their original design. They were chosen and paid because of their expertise. Why not follow their advice? Also, 8th Street provides more parking adjacent to the path. The area between the parking and the path is relatively flat and provides easy access, better than at 11th Street. 8th Street provides an additional entrance/exit to the pilot path. Stopping at 11th Street (700’) doesn’t really provide adequate room for a fair test. Going to 8th Street as a pilot program for 1 year would give us all a chance to experience the path during all 4 seasons. In the future, if there is no more additional accessible path, from Pier to 8th would stand as an excellent example of The City of Hermosa Beach continuing to provide access to all.

For the reasons above, we urge you to adopt Option #1 with the natural edge, go all the way to 8th Street, and test it for a year’s time.

Thank you,
Access Hermosa
1358
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 31, 2022

CONSIDERATION OF TAKING ACTION AND GIVING DIRECTION TO

STAFF ON ITEMS FROM THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) STUDY SESSION
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Approve and adopt the 2022 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (Attachment 1);

2. Direct staff to advance recommendations in the 2022 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan, as funds are available in future budget cycles; and

3. Select Option 1 as presented in the Study Session for design and construction of a pilot trail on the Greenbelt from Pier Avenue to 11th Street and direct staff to incorporate the project, along with other new funding requests, in the FY2022-23 budget review and approval process (Attachment 3).

Executive Summary:

This evening’s ADA Study Session detailed the City’s ongoing ADA program efforts, the draft Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and the Feasibility Study for an Accessible Trail along the Greenbelt. Based on the staff presentation and discussion of items at the ADA Study Session, Council may choose to take the staff recommended actions at this Adjourned Meeting of the City Council.

Background:

ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
At its July 13, 2021 meeting, City Council directed staff to return for a study session focused on the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) program including efforts to complete the incomplete 2015 Draft ADA Transition Plan.

ADA Inspection Plus, LLC prepared a draft ADA Transition Plan for the City in 2015 to assist with the City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1359
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
ADA Inspection Plus, LLC prepared a draft ADA Transition Plan for the City in 2015 to assist with the identification of physical barriers of access to facilities and to develop barrier removal solutions to facilitate access for all individuals. The report also provided an overview of the obligation public entities have to develop a Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and outlined the plan development process. As part of the preparation of the 2015 Draft Transition Plan, the consultant team prepared a series of Self-Evaluation Reports for the City’s main public facilities.

The City created and involved the Access Hermosa Working Group (AHWG) to help comment on the 2015 Draft Transition Plan. Formed by the City Manager, the AHWG met approximately once per month 2015 through 2019 to discuss ADA access concerns and make suggestions to City staff. In 2019, the AHWG was given the opportunity to comment on the 2015 Draft Transition Plan and submit feedback to City staff. For a number of reasons beyond the City’s control (including exigencies created by the COVID-19 pandemic), adoption of the proposed plan was delayed.

The City has since contracted with Access, Inc. to provide Certified Access Specialist (CASp) services, review the 2015 Draft Transition Plan, and update the plan with currently known information to serve as the City’s 2022 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (Attachments 1 and 2).

The City Manager reconvened the AHWG to meet on February 9, 2022 to comment on the draft 2022 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and the draft Greenbelt Accessibility Feasibility Study. Staff also presented these items to Public Works Commission at its March 2, 2022 meeting.

Greenbelt Feasibility Study for ADA Accessibility
At its February 27, 2018 meeting, City Council was presented an item titled ADA Assessment and Proposed Decomposed Granite Path on the Greenbelt during which staff recommended further review and policy direction for ADA accessibility upon the Greenbelt. Following discussion, Council directed staff to further investigate modification options to the Greenbelt for an accessible path consistent with the current zoning requirements and to work with the AHWG and the Public Works Commission. Council further directed staff to include in the agenda item presented to the Public Works Commission a report from a landscape architect with options allowed under existing zoning requirements.

The City contracted with an ADA specialist, Access, Inc., and a landscaping architect, SWA Group, to study the feasibility of an accessible trail along a portion of, or throughout, the Greenbelt (Attachment 3). The work was done as part of a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Study 544- Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment.

PastCommission and Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
February 27, 2018 Council directed staff to continue to work with A HWG, Public Works Commission, and the City Attorney and
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1360
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
PastCommission and Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
February 27, 2018 Council directed staff to continue to work with A HWG, Public Works Commission, and the City Attorney and
return to the Council at a future meeting with
recommendations for either (1) implementing the proposed Greenbelt modifications consistent with current zoning
requirements, OR(2) providing the actions needed to
place the issue of potential modifications to The Greenbelt as a ballot measure at a future election. Staff was further directed to include, in the agenda item presented to the Public Works Commission, a report from a l andscape
architect with opinions on options within existing zoning requirements, making clear that the issue is to be brought back as time allows .

July 13, 2021 As part of the Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2021 –22 Budget, City Council directed staff to retu rn for a study session focused on the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) program including efforts to complete the
incomplete 2015 Draft ADA Transition Plan.

March 2, 2022 Public Works Commission (PWC) received and filed the draft ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and the
draft Feasibility Study for an Accessible Trail along the Greenbelt and recommended the City Council approve the
draft ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition with the
incorporation of PWC comments.

Discussion:

City ADA Program Efforts
The City of Hermosa Beach has actively made and continues to make significant efforts improving accessibility throughout the City. Some of those efforts include dedicating an ADA coordinator; retaining a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) consultant; establishing an ADA grievance process; and finalizing the City’s draft ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. The City has also committed approximately $662,000 in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to address ADA issues and grievances, fund ADA consulting, and address priority accessibility enhancement needs.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1361
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
The City also incorporates ADA improvement elements throughout Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) and private developments on a continuous basis. Examples include adding new curb ramps as part of pavement resurfacing, installing and updating ADA parking spaces, ensuring ADA compliance of new city facilities such as the park restrooms and increasing accessibility to beaches and parks.

ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
The City brought aboard a CASp consultant, Access, Inc. to review and update the 2015 Draft ADA Transition Plan and associated facilities site surveys (Attachment 2), which once finalized and adopted by City Council, will serve as the City’s 2022 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (“2022 Transition Plan”).

An ADA transition plan is a living document and is a tool that Title II of the ADA requires cities to develop, identifying and prioritizing accessibility issues. A public entity's services, programs, or activities, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. This standard, known as "program accessibility," applies to all existing facilities of a public entity. Public entities, however, are not necessarily required to make each of their existing facilities accessible. Given the tremendous amount of time and expense needed to achieve complete program accessibility, the primary purpose of a transition plan is to demonstrate a city’s good faith commitment to doing so, which in many cases requires several decades.

Title II of the ADA requires that public entities take several steps designed to achieve program accessibility, including preparation of the self-evaluation and notice to the public. Public entities with 50 or more employees are also required to develop a grievance procedure, designate an ADA coordinator, develop a transition plan if structural changes are necessary for achieving program accessibility, and retain the self-evaluation for three years.

Five phases of access compliance were used to assess the status of the City’s Program Accessibility, including Commitment, Self-Evaluation, Transition, Implementation, and Ongoing Support. The City is currently engaging in ongoing efforts in all five phases of access compliance with recommended actions, which include finalizing the draft ADA Transition Plan and the subsequent approval and adoption of the ADA Transition Plan by City Council.

The City’s 2022 Transition Plan is intended to consolidate the unfinished 2015 Draft Transition Plan prepared by ADA Inspection Plus, LLC. and the self-evaluation of selected facilities completed to date. Although areas of self-evaluation are yet to be completed, the report nonetheless functions as the City’s 2022 Transition Plan to demonstrate its good faith commitment to achieve program accessibility in measurable steps and goals over the next several decades. Areas yet to be examined for accessibility will be the subject of individualized self-evaluation reports to be completed at a later City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1362
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
for accessibility will be the subject of individualized self-evaluation reports to be completed at a later date and then added to the 2022 Transition Plan at that time.

The 2022 Transition Plan identifies physical barriers at City facilities, compiles ADA facility evaluation reports, provides cost estimates of improvements, identities priorities, and provides an implementation schedule of the improvements. As mentioned, the 2022 Transition Plan is a living document that requires updating as accessibility goals are achieved and new ones arise. The ADA improvements that are recommended in the 2022 Transition Plan will require funding and resource commitment from the City to implement. Implementation of these improvements will take time, some of which will span several decades.

Greenbelt Feasibility
The Feasibility Study for an Accessible Trail along the Greenbelt, prepared by the City’s consultant Access, Inc., assesses the practicality of providing an accessible route along a portion, or throughout the Greenbelt.

The Greenbelt was developed in 1986 on an abandoned Santa Fe Railroad spur. Over time, the City provided incremental access improvements to the Greenbelt with the construction of curb ramps and ramps at cross streets and various mid-block points of access. Additionally, the City also installed workout stations, water fountains, benches and monuments.

The Greenbelt is currently zoned O-S-1 Restricted Open Space. As per Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) § 17.32.010, the O-S-1 zone is intended to restrict the further use of certain designated open space to ensure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreation areas. The uses permitted in the O-S-1 zone are codified in Hermosa HBMC § 17.30.020 and lists 13 types of uses (e.g., public parks, playgrounds, bicycling and pedestrian walkways, etc.). Furthermore, improvements permitted in the Greenbelt are restricted to only nonbuilding public improvements relating to landscaping, beautification, erosion control, and irrigation improvements by the City which are consistent with or necessary to maintain and ensure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreation purposes. These restrictions are further described in the February 22, 2018 memorandum titled “Improvements on the Greenbelt” which is included as part of Attachment 3.

The 2014 Architect Barriers Act Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas and the 2010 American with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Designs were used as the reference standards for the feasibility of an accessible route on the Greenbelt. From those standards, field observations and analysis, the pedestrian trail route type was determined to be the best-suited trail type to define the required improvements and associated slope requirements for a possible Greenbelt accessible path.

One of the critical elements of an accessible path is the pathway material used. The material shall be firm, stable, and slip resistant for it to be accessible. The existing wood chips do not meet these City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1363
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
firm, stable, and slip resistant for it to be accessible. The existing wood chips do not meet these requirements. Another important criterion for the City is to maintain the natural look of the Greenbelt.

As such, the recommended material that best matches these requirements is decomposed granite (DG), which resembles a fine gravel or coarse sand, and can be obtained in different colors to best match the surroundings. If a new DG pedestrian trail were to be installed on the Greenbelt, drainage and grading would need to be improved to keep the trail dry. Enhanced maintenance, such as ensuring the DG remains stabilized and trimming overgrown branches and vegetation as necessary, would also need to be considered.

The feasibility study found that it is technically feasible for the City to make either all or a portion of the Greenbelt accessible, provided that slope requirements are met. The recommended location for an initial pilot project is between Pier Avenue and 8th Street as this segment offers all the elements offered elsewhere along the Greenbelt (monument, workout station, benches, water fountain, etc.).

The City engaged SWA Group, a landscape architect, to provide conceptual designs to assist with the visualization of what an accessible pedestrian trail could look like along a shorter portion of this segment of the Greenbelt from Pier Avenue to 11th Street to establish an initial pilot. The City could in the future add additional elements as discussed above or extend the pilot segment to 8th Street.

The visualizations include three options for an initial pilot along the segment of the Greenbelt, from Pier Avenue to 11th Street, to establish and detail considerations for edge treatments and colorization of the DG material:
· Option 1-replace the entire wood chip path in the pilot segment with DG. This option would be the lowest maintenance and create a seamless sense of access for all but would require the complete replacement of the wood chips and minor modifications to existing irrigation and landscaping;
· Option 2-combine wood chips and DG in the pilot segment area into one path with 6 feet of wood chips on one side and 6 feet of DG on the other side. This option would keep some of the existing wood chips to provide an option of either material for pedestrians but would require significant maintenance to prevent mixing of materials and may increase conflicts between passing users. It would also require a fixed header to separate the material, which may be a potential tripping hazard. Minor modifications to existing irrigation and planting would still be needed; and
· Option 3-create a separate DG path in the pilot segment, just west of and parallel to the existing wood chip pathway. This option would provide a dedicated DG path, retain the existing wood chip path, and reduce the risk of conflicts between Greenbelt users traveling in opposite City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1364
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
wood chip path, and reduce the risk of conflicts between Greenbelt users traveling in opposite directions. This is the highest cost option and would require some planting and possible tree removal (and replanting). Given the variability of the terrain in different segments of the Greenbelt, this approach may not be feasible for the entirety of the Greenbelt without significant regrading.

Each of these options would provide an accessible pedestrian trail on the Greenbelt. While wood chips create a barrier to some people with physical disabilities, the Greenbelt is “Safe Harbored” because it was built before the ADA. This means the City does not have to make modifications to elements in the Greenbelt that comply with ADA Standards, unless alterations occur, or through a barrier removal plan. The Access Feasibility Study of the Greenbelt will be incorporated in the City’s future Transition Plan.

In review of these options with the AHWG on February 9, 2022, the group generally favored Option 1 as it provided access for all in a single location versus separate paths for users of different abilities.

At its March 2, 2022 meeting, the Public Works Commission generally supported Options 1 or 3, with most favoring Option 3. Option 2 was the least favorable option during discussions with both groups and is not recommended by staff due primarily to concerns over maintenance. Should it decide to move forward with the pilot project, staff recommends City Council consider Option 1 as it reduces overall maintenance needs for this segment of the Greenbelt (i.e., one material), minimizes impacts to adjacent plantings, has the lowest capital cost, and provides the most equal access for users of all abilities.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Governance Element
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.

Policies:
· 1.1 Open meetings. Maintain the community’s trust by holding meetings in which decisions are being made, that are open and available for all community members to attend, participate, or view remotely.
· 1.2 Strategic planning. Regularly discuss and set priorities at the City Council and management level to prioritize work programs and staffing needs. · 1.3 Priority-based budgeting. Utilize priority-based budgeting to ensure funding allocations are consistent with the priorities set by the community and City Council. · 1.4 Consensus oriented. Strive to utilize a consensus-oriented decision-making process.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1365
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
Goal 2. The community is active and engaged in decision-making processes.

Policy:
· 2.4 Public Forum. Host periodic public forums on issues important to the community, facilitating these forums with the purpose of guiding City policy.

Mobility Element
Goal 3. Public rights-of-way supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile.

Policies:
· 3.1 Enhance public rights-of-way. Where right-of-way clearance allows, enhance public rights -of-way to improve connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled persons, and public transit stops.
· 3.10 Require ADA standards. Require that all public rights-of-way be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by incorporating crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons.

Parks + Open Space Element
Goal 1. First class, well maintained, and safe recreational facilities, parks and open spaces.

Policies:
· 1.4 Low-maintenance design. Promote environmentally sustainable and low maintenance design principles in the renovation, addition, or maintenance of parks and recreation facilities. · 1.5 Evaluate community needs. Conduct a periodic review of community park needs and interests to inform maintenance and investment priorities.

Goal 4. Direct and accessible routes and connections to parks, recreational facilities, and open space are provided.

Policy:
· 4.4 ADA accessible park access. Install ADA and universally accessible amenities and equipment so that all parks, beach, and trail networks are accessible to all persons.

Infrastructure Element
Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional, safe, and well maintained.

Policies:
· 1.1 Infrastructure systems plan. Establish and adopt an integrated, holistic systems approach to guide infrastructure development, improvement, maintenance, and resilience. · 1.2 Priority investments. Use City Council established priorities and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to identify and allocate funding for projects identified in the infrastructure plan.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1366
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0176
Fiscal Impact:

Funds would need to be appropriated to advance recommendations in the 2022 Transition Plan, as funds are available in future budget cycles. Staff will present the selected option for the pilot accessible trail on the Greenbelt along with other new funding requests, during the FY2022-23 budget review and approval process.

Attachments:

1. Draft 2022 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan

2. Draft ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Appendix B-ADA Evaluation Reports

3. Feasibility Study for an Accessible Trail along the Greenbelt

4. Link to February 27, 2018 City Council Staff Report on ADA Assessment and Proposed Decomposed Granite Path on Greenbelt

5. Link to July 13, 2021 City Council Staff Report for Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget

6. Link to March 2, 2022 Public Works Commission Staff Report on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and Feasibility Study for an Accessible Trail along the Greenbelt

7. Presentation Slides
Respectfully Submitted by: Andrew Nguyen, Associate Engineer Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer
Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 9 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1367
2901 West Coast Hwy, Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949) 270-2775 www.adaexperts.net City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services

DRAFT February 8, 2022
City of Hermosa Beach
Public Works Department
Administration and Engineering Division
1315 Valley Drive, Basement Level
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Attention: Mr. Lucho Rodriguez, P.E., Deputy City Engineer Subject: Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Self Evaluation and Transition Plan City of Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Dear Mr. Rodriguez,

Access, Inc. is pleased to have the opportunity to be of service to the City of Hermosa Beach by performing a review of the City’s Draft Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. Access, Inc. reviewed a copy of the City’s 2015 Draft ADA Transition Plan and various site survey inspection reports prepared to date. The 2015 Draft ADA Transition Plan has been updated with currently known information, and together with the site surveys, serve as the City’s ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.

As will be explained in greater detail in the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan, a transition plan is a living document and is a tool the ADA requires cities to develop to identify and prioritize accessibility issues in a city’s facilities, services, and programs based on legally-mandated self-evaluations. Though the City has completed numerous self-evaluations over the years, there are some areas that are yet to be assessed for ADA compliance. This is normal. Any remaining areas will be included in future updates to the ADA Transition Plan, which we are happy to assist the City with.

If there are any questions or clarification is needed, please contact our office at (949) 270-2775.

Respectfully,
Matthew D. Steele
Certified Access Specialist (CASp) #865
1368
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 2

ADA SELF-EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
1369
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 3
I. INTRODUCTION
The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) enacted on July 26, 1990, is a Federal Civil Rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. The ADA is built upon the foundation laid out by Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act.

It uses as its model Section 504's definition of disability and then goes further. While Section 504 applies only to entities receiving federal financial assistance, the ADA covers all state and local governments, including those that receive no federal financial assistance. Section 504 works together with the ADA to protect children and adults with disabilities from exclusion, and unequal treatment in schools, jobs and the community.

While the ADA consists of five titles, Title II is the section specifically applicable to programs, services, and activities provided by “public entities” (state and local governments) including state executive agencies, towns, counties, school districts, universities, community colleges, special purpose districts, regional transit authorities, and other state and local government instrumentalities. Generally, Title II of the ADA requires a public entity to make reasonable changes to policies, ensure effective communication with people with disabilities, and provide physical access to buildings, facilities, and programs with the goal of ensuring meaningful access to all its services and offerings. This requirement extends not only to physical access to facilities, programs, and events; but also to pedestrian facilities in public rights-of-way.

To provide the legal background of this ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan, Part I of this report will discuss the ADA Title II requirements applicable to public entities, including cities’ obligations to prepare self-evaluations and transition plans. Part II then goes on to summarize the City’s Transition Plan; past site-specific self-evaluations; facilities, programs, services yet to be assessed; and recommended steps to achieve access compliance, also known as “program accessibility”. It is important to stress that transition plans are living documents. Given the tremendous amount of time and expense that may be needed to achieve program accessibility, the primary purposes of a transition plan is to demonstrate a city’s good faith commitment to that goal, which in many cases requires several decades.

A. GENERAL ADA TITLE II REQUIREMENTS

1. Equality in Participation/Benefits
The ADA provides for equality of opportunity but does not guarantee equality of results.

The foundation of many of the specific requirements in the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Department”) regulations is the principle that individuals with disabilities must be provided an equally effective opportunity to participate in or benefit from a public entity's 1370
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 4
aids, benefits, and services. On the other hand, as long as persons with disabilities are afforded an equally effective opportunity to participate in or benefit from a public entity's aids, benefits, and services, the ADA's guarantee of equal opportunity is not violated.

Also, the ADA generally does not require a State or local government entity to provide additional services for individuals with disabilities that are not provided for individuals without disabilities.

2. Separate Benefit/Integrated Setting
A primary goal of the ADA is the equal participation of individuals with disabilities in the "mainstream" of American society. The major principles of mainstreaming are – 1) Individuals with disabilities must be integrated to the maximum extent appropriate.
2) Separate programs are permitted where necessary to ensure equal opportunity. A separate program must be appropriate to the particular individual. 3) Individuals with disabilities cannot be excluded from the regular program or required to accept special services or benefits.
a. Separate Programs
A public entity may offer separate or special programs when necessary to provide individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from the programs. Such programs must, however, be specifically designed to meet the needs of the individuals with disabilities for whom they are provided.
b. Relationship to “Program Accessibility” Requirement
The integrated setting requirement may conflict with the obligation to provide “program accessibility”, which may not necessarily mandate physical access to all parts of all facilities (see “Program Accessibility” section, below). Provision of services to individuals with disabilities in a different location, for example, is one method of achieving program accessibility. Public entities should make every effort to ensure that alternative methods of providing program access do not result in unnecessary segregation.

3. Reasonable Modifications
A public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination. If the public entity can demonstrate, however, that the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of its service, program, or activity, it is not required to make the modification.
1371
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 5

4. Maintenance of Accessible Features
Public entities must maintain in working order equipment and features of facilities that are required to provide ready access to individuals with disabilities. Isolated or temporary interruptions in access due to maintenance and repair of accessible features are not prohibited.

Where a public entity must provide an accessible route, the route must remain accessible and not blocked by obstacles such as furniture, filing cabinets, or potted plants. An isolated instance of placement of an object on an accessible route, however, would not be a violation, if the object is promptly removed. Similarly, accessible doors must be unlocked when the public entity is open for business.

Mechanical failures in equipment such as elevators or automatic doors will occur from time to time. The obligation to ensure that facilities are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities would be violated, if repairs are not made promptly or if improper or inadequate maintenance causes repeated and persistent failures.

B. EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS
Beginning January 26, 1992, Title II prohibits all public entities, regardless of size of workforce, from discriminating in their employment practices against qualified individuals with disabilities.

1. Other Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination In addition to the Title II employment coverage, Title I of the ADA and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities by certain public entities. Title I of the ADA, which is primarily enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), prohibits job discrimination –
1) Effective July 26, 1992, by State and local employers with 25 or more employees; and
2) Effective July 26, 1994, by State and local employers with 15 or more employees. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination in employment in programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance, including federally funded State or local programs or activities. Each Federal agency that extends financial assistance is responsible for enforcement of section 504 in the programs it funds.
1372
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 6

2. Reasonable Accommodation
All public entities must make "reasonable accommodation" to the known physical or mental limitations of otherwise qualified applicants or employees with disabilities, unless the public entity can show that the accommodation would impose an "undue hardship" on the operation of its program.
"Reasonable accommodation" means any change or adjustment to a job or work environment that permits a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to participate in the job application process, to perform the essential functions of a job, or to enjoy benefits and privileges of employment equal to those enjoyed by employees without disabilities. Examples include –
1) Acquiring or modifying equipment or devices;
2) Job restructuring;
3) Part-time or modified work schedules;
4) Providing readers or interpreters; and
5) Making the workplace accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.

However, any particular change or adjustment would not be required if, under the circumstances involved, it would result in an undue hardship. "Undue hardship" means significant difficulty or expense relative to the operation of a public entity's program. Where a particular accommodation would result in an undue hardship, the public entity must determine if another accommodation is available that would not result in an undue hardship.

C. PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY
A public entity may not deny the benefits of its programs, activities, and services to individuals with disabilities because its facilities are inaccessible. A public entity's services, programs, or activities, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. This standard, known as "program accessibility," applies to all existing facilities of a public entity. Public entities, however, are not necessarily required to make each of their existing facilities accessible.

Public entities may achieve program accessibility by a number of methods. In many situations, providing access to facilities through structural methods, such as alteration of existing facilities and acquisition or construction of additional facilities, may be the most efficient method of providing program accessibility. The public entity may, however, pursue alternatives to structural changes in order to achieve program accessibility. 1373
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 7
Nonstructural methods include acquisition or redesign of equipment, assignment of aides to beneficiaries, and provision of services at alternate accessible sites. Put differently, unlike private entities under Title III of the ADA, public entities are not required to remove barriers from each facility, even if removal is readily achievable. A public entity must make its "programs" accessible. Physical changes to a building are required only when there is no other feasible way to make the program accessible.

1. Curb Ramps
Public entities that have responsibility or authority over streets, roads, or walkways must prepare a schedule for providing curb ramps where pedestrian walkways cross curbs.

Public entities must give priority to walkways serving State and local government offices and facilities, transportation, places of public accommodation, and employees, followed by walkways serving other areas. This schedule must be included as part of a transition plan (see Section F.2 “Transition Plan”, below).

2. Existing Parking Lots or Garages
A public entity should provide an adequate number of accessible parking spaces in existing parking lots or garages over which it has jurisdiction.

3. Time Periods for Achieving Program Accessibility
Public entities must achieve program accessibility by January 26, 1992. If structural changes are needed to achieve program accessibility, they must be made as expeditiously as possible, but in no event later than January 26, 1995. This three-year time period is not a grace period; all changes must be accomplished as expeditiously as possible. In addition, a public entity that employs 50 or more persons must develop a transition plan by July 26, 1992, setting forth the steps necessary to complete such changes (see Section F.2 “Transition Plan”, below).1 Title II also requires public entities to complete a self-evaluation by January 26, 1993 (see Section F.1 “Self-Evaluation”, below).2 Failure to complete a self-evaluation does not excuse public entities from compliance with Title II’s requirements.
1 Though the City has not completed a transition plan until now (which by law addresses the removal of existing structural barriers only), the City through various capital improvement programs over the decades has ensured renovations to existing public facilities and new construction comply with current California Building Code (CBC) and ADA accessibility standards.  In addition, through its ADA grievance procedures, the City has made improvements to several facilities on a case‐by‐case basis. 2 While no formal self‐evaluation(s) has been prepared until recent years, the City assesses its programs, activities, and services on an ongoing basis to provide equal access to persons with disabilities (to the extent required by law) and avoid discriminatory treatment.  See also fn. 1.
1374
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 8
D. NEW CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATIONS
All facilities designed, constructed, or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of a public entity must be readily accessible and usable by individuals with disabilities, if the construction or alteration is begun after January 26, 1992. This means that the facility must be designed, constructed, or altered in strict compliance with a design standard.

The Title II regulation gives public entities a choice of two standards that may be used:
the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) or the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG). 28 CFR § 35.151. The major differences between these two standards as they apply to specific facilities and elements of those facilities are summarized in Section II-6.3000 of The ADA Title Technical Assistance Manual published by the U.S. Department of Justice available at https://www.ada.gov/taman2.html.

1. Curb Ramps
When streets, roads, or highways are newly built or altered, they must have ramps or sloped areas wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry from a sidewalk or path. Likewise, when new sidewalks or paths are built or altered, there must be curb ramps or sloped areas wherever they intersect with streets, roads, or highways.

E. COMMUNICATIONS
A public entity must ensure that its communications with individuals with disabilities are as effective as communications with others. This obligation, however, does not require a public entity to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its services, programs, or activities, or in undue financial and administrative burdens.

In order to provide equal access, a public accommodation is required to make available appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to ensure effective communication.

Examples of auxiliary aids and services for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing include qualified interpreters, note takers, computer-aided transcription services, written materials, telephone handset amplifiers, assistive listening systems, telephones compatible with hearing aids, closed caption decoders, open and closed captioning, telecommunications devices for deaf persons (TDD's), videotext displays, and exchange of written notes.
1375
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 9
Examples for individuals with vision impairments include qualified readers, taped texts, audio recordings, Brailed materials, large print materials, and assistance in locating items.

Examples for individuals with speech impairments include TDD's, computer terminals, speech synthesizers, and communication boards.

The type of auxiliary aid or service necessary to ensure effective communication will vary in accordance with the length and complexity of the communication involved F. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Title II requires that public entities take several steps designed to achieve program accessibility. These include –
 The preparation of a self-evaluation; and
 Notice to the public of Title II.

In addition, public entities with 50 or more employees are required to –  Develop a grievance procedure;
 Designate an individual to oversee Title II compliance (e.g., an ADA coordinator);
 Develop a transition plan if structural changes are necessary for achieving program accessibility; and
 Retain the self-evaluation for three years.

1. Self-Evaluation
All public entities subject to Title II of the ADA were required to complete a selfevaluation by January 26, 1993.3 28 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR)” § 35.105. A self-evaluation is a public entity's assessment of its current policies and practices. The self-evaluation identifies and corrects those policies and practices that are inconsistent with the Title II requirements.

A public entity that employs 50 or more employees must retain its self-evaluation for three years. Other public entities are not required to retain their self-evaluations but are encouraged to do so because these documents are evidence a public entity's good faith efforts to comply with the Title II requirements.
3 See fn. 2, above.
1376
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 10
As part of the self-evaluation, a public entity should:
1) Identify all of the public entity's programs, activities, and services; and 2) Review all the policies and practices that govern the administration of the public entity's programs, activities, and services.

Normally, a public entity's policies and practices are reflected in its laws, ordinances, regulations, administrative manuals or guides, policy directives, and memoranda. Other practices, however, may not be recorded and may be based on local custom.

Once a public entity has identified its policies and practices, it should analyze whether these policies and practices adversely affect the full participation of individuals with disabilities in its programs, activities, and services. In this regard, a public entity should be mindful that although its policies and practices may appear harmless, they may result in denying individuals with disabilities the full participation of its programs, activities, or services. A public entity should carefully examine the programs, activities, and services discussed in Section B (“Employment”), Section C (“Program Accessibility”), Section E (“Communications”), above, and more specifically perform the following in preparing a self-evaluation.
1) A public entity must examine each program to determine whether any physical barriers to access exist. It should identify steps that need to be taken to enable these programs to be made accessible when viewed in their entirety. If structural changes are necessary, they should be included in the transition plan. 2) A public entity must review its policies and practices to determine whether any exclude or limit the participation of individuals with disabilities in its programs, activities, or services. Such policies or practices must be modified, unless they are necessary for the operation or provision of the program, service, or activity.

The self-evaluation should identify policy modifications to be implemented and include complete justifications for any exclusionary or limiting policies or practices that will not be modified.
3) A public entity should review its policies to ensure that it communicates with applicants, participants, and members of the public with disabilities in a manner that is as effective as its communications with others. If a public entity communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, it should ensure that TDD's or equally effective telecommunication systems are used to 1377
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 11
communicate with individuals with impaired hearing or speech. Finally, if a public entity provides telephone emergency services, it should review its policies to ensure direct access to individuals who use TDD's and computer modems. 4) A public entity should review its policies to ensure that they include provisions for readers for individuals with visual impairments; interpreters or other alternative communication measures, as appropriate, for individuals with hearing impairments; and amanuenses for individuals with manual impairments. A method for securing these services should be developed, including guidance on when and where these services will be provided. Where equipment is used as part of a public entity's program, activity, or service, an assessment should be made to ensure that the equipment is usable by individuals with disabilities, particularly individuals with hearing, visual, and manual impairments. In addition, a public entity should have policies that ensure that its equipment is maintained in operable working order.
5) A review should be made of the procedures to evacuate individuals with disabilities during an emergency. This may require the installation of visual and audible warning signals and special procedures for assisting individuals with disabilities from a facility during an emergency.
6) A review should be conducted of a public entity's written and audio-visual materials to ensure that individuals with disabilities are not portrayed in an offensive or demeaning manner.
7) If a public entity operates historic preservation programs, it should review its policies to ensure that it gives priority to methods that provide physical access to individuals with disabilities.
8) A public entity should review its policies to ensure that its decisions concerning a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program, activity, or service, or a decision that an undue financial and administrative burden will be imposed by Title II, are made properly and expeditiously.
9) A public entity should review its policies and procedures to ensure that individuals with mobility impairments are provided access to public meetings. 10) A public entity should review its employment practices to ensure that they comply with other applicable nondiscrimination requirements, including section 1378
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 12
504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA regulation issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
11) A public entity should review its building and construction policies to ensure that the construction of each new facility or part of a facility, or the alteration of existing facilities after January 26, 1992, conforms to the standards designated under the applicable Title II regulation.
12) A review should be made to ascertain whether measures have been taken to ensure that employees of a public entity are familiar with the policies and practices for the full participation of individuals with disabilities. If appropriate, training should be provided to employees.
13) If a public entity limits or denies participation in its programs, activities, or services based on drug usage, it should make sure that such policies do not discriminate against former drug users, as opposed to individuals who are currently engaged in illegal use of drugs.

2. Notice to the Public
A public entity must provide information on Title II's requirements to applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons. The notice shall explain Title II's applicability to the public entity's services, programs, or activities. A public entity shall provide such information as the head of the public entity determines to be necessary to apprise individuals of Title II's prohibitions against discrimination.

Public notice methods include the publication of information in handbooks, manuals, and pamphlets that are distributed to the public to describe a public entity's programs and activities; the display of informative posters in service centers and other public places; or the broadcast of information by television, radio, or the internet. In providing the notice, a public entity must comply with the Title II requirements for effective communication, including alternate formats, as appropriate.

3. Development of Grievance Procedures
A public entity that employs 50 or more persons must adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by Title II.

4. Designation of Responsible Employee
1379
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 13
In addition, a public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and fulfill its responsibilities under Title II, including the investigation of complaints. A public entity shall make available the name, office address, and telephone number of any designated employee. This person is commonly referred to as the ADA Coordinator.

5. Transition Plan
Where structural modifications are required to achieve program accessibility, a public entity with 50 or more employees must develop a transition plan by July 26, 1992, that provides for the removal of these barriers. 28 CFR § 35.150(d).4 Any structural modifications must be completed as expeditiously as possible, but, in any event, by January 26, 1995. When completed, a copy of the transition plan must be made available for public inspection.

A transition plan must contain at a minimum –
1) A list of the physical barriers in a public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs, activities, or services to individuals with disabilities; 2) A description of the methods to be utilized to remove these barriers and make the facilities accessible;
3) The schedule for taking the necessary steps to achieve compliance with Title II’s regulations. If the time period for achieving compliance is longer than one year, the plan should identify the interim steps that will be taken during each year of the transition period; and
4) The name and contact information of the public official responsible for the plan’s implementation.
4 See fn. 1, above.
1380
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 14
II. 2022 ADA SELF-EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN
A. PREFACE
This report is intended to consolidate the unfinished 2015 Draft Transition Plan by ADA Inspection Plus, LLC. and the self-evaluation of selected facilities to date. Though areas of self-evaluation are yet to be completed, this report nonetheless functions as the City’s 2022 Self-Evaluation and ADA Transition Plan (“2022 Transition Plan”) to demonstrate its good faith commitment to achieve program accessibility in measurable steps and goals. Areas yet to be examined for accessibility will be the subject of individualized self-evaluation reports to be completed at a later date.

B. FOCUS OF 2022 TRANSITION PLAN
This report focuses on subtitle A of Title II. Subtitle A is intended to protect qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of disability in the services, programs, or activities of all State and local governments. It additionally extends the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of disability established by section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, to all activities of State and local governments, including those that do not receive Federal financial assistance.

Barriers that deny or limit access to programs, services or activities may be structural or nonstructural. This report focuses on structural barriers. Structural barriers are referenced in this 2022 Transition Plan by site and are described in detail in the selfevaluation reports of sites inspected over the years. It is important to note that the recommended corrections in site evaluation reports are options, and that some structural barriers may be addressed by using a programmatic methodology if they do not involve new construction or new remodeling and renovation.

C. CURRENT STATUS OF ACCESS COMPLIANCE
This report applies a simplified conceptual framework known as the “Five Phases of Access Compliance” to assess the status of the City’s program accessibility. This framework was created by the State of California Department of Government Services (DGS), the five phases of which are summarized below.5
5 The DGS framework is derived from Title II and California Government Code Section 4450 et seq. and do not have the force of law.  The Five Phases framework was developed as an advisory bulletin for public entities that, like the City, are subject to both Title II of the ADA and Title 1, Division 5, Chapter 7 (Access to Public Buildings by Physically Handicapped Persons) of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 4450.  Chapter 7 requires that buildings, structures, sidewalks, curbs, and related facilities funded by state, county, or municipal funds be 1381
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 15
Phase I. Commitment
This phase involves the designation of an employee as the ADA Coordinator, notice to the public of how Title II applies to the public entity, adoption of an ADA Grievance procedure, and the hiring of a Certified Access Specialist (CASp).

Phase II. Self-Evaluation
This phase involves the completion of a self-evaluation as described in Section F.1 (“Self-Evaluation”), above.

Phase III. Transition
This transition phase involves the development and completion of a transition plan as described in Section F.2 (“Transition Plan”), above.

Phase IV. Implementation
This phase achieves the goals established in the self-evaluation and transition plan.

Phase V. Ongoing Support
This phase is the maintenance and quality control phase and includes such steps as a final report on compliance status, periodic evaluations of compliance status, scheduled maintenance of access features, resolution of access issues as they arise, and ensuring new facilities, alterations, and repairs are ADA-compliant.

Table 1 below sets forth a basic summary of the current status of the City’s program accessibility.
accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.  Such publicly funded facilities (which include those leased by a city) must comply with the California Building Code (CBC) Standards relating to access to persons with disabilities and federal standards.
1382
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 16
TABLE 1

FIVE PHASES OF ACCESS COMPLIANCE
Phase Status Steps Taken Actions
Required/Recommended
I: Commitment Ongoing ADA Coordinator has been
designated, grievance
procedures developed, and
CASp consultant hired.

Provide public notice of ADA
requirements applicable to City,
and maintain commitment to
access compliance.

II: Self
Evaluation
Ongoing ADA inspection reports are
completed for (1) main public
buildings; (2) main parking
lots and on-street parking
segments; and (3) sidewalks
and curb ramps.
1) Update existing ADA reports;
(2) complete self-evaluation of
remaining programs, services,
and facilities; (3) and review
every 3-4 years.

III: Transition Ongoing 2022 Transition Plan has
been prepared.

Incorporate updated ADA
reports, self-evaluation of
remaining programs, services,
and facilities into Plan, and
review Plan every 3-4 years.

IV:

Implementation
Ongoing Not yet applicable; City will
complete goals in 2022
Transition Plan according to
recommendations and
implementation schedule
shown in Appendix A.

Update the implementation
dates in the ADA reports and
Transition Plan as budget and
priority dictates.

V. Ongoing
Support
Ongoing City is employing its
grievance procedure,
ensures public works
projects meet CBC and ADA
regulations, and is in regular
contact with its CASp
employee or consultant.

Provide periodic assessment
related to the proper
maintenance of all access
features.

D. 2022 ADA TRANSITION PLAN DOCUMENTS
Access, Inc. has reviewed the documents listed below. Each evaluation report contains an inventory of features at a facility (e.g., parking signs and striping) and an assessment of these features’ compliance with applicable CBC and ADA standards. The earliest evaluation report was prepared in 2015, and as discussed in the “Recommendations” 1383
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 17
section below, these reports should be updated by the time of the City’s next transition plan cycle to reflect current conditions (e.g., compliance achieved, structure removed, etc.). Access, Inc. has updated cost estimates in the summary assessment included with the 2015 Draft Transition Plan, and added cost estimates and the status of completed work to the City of Hermosa Beach Citywide Disabled Parking Report prepared by Creative Design Associates & Martin Brothers Construction Services. The updated costs to correct each violation listed in the 2015 Draft Transition Plan were based on an average inflation rate of 2.21% per year. The estimated costs do not include design, project and/or construction management, construction inspection and any contingencies.

These updates are indicated in bold red text in the reports.  Hermosa Beach Draft Transition Plan, dated September 24, 2015 (ADA Inspection Plus LLC)
 Program Accessibility Evaluation Reports (ADA Inspection Plus LLC) for:
o 13th St. Parking Structure
o Clark Building
o Valley Park Building
o Kiwanis Shared Building Exterior Access & Parking
o Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club
o Hermosa Beach Rotary Club
o Fire Department
o Police Department
o City Hall
o Civic Center Exterior
o City Yard
o Base 3 Building
o South Park Building
o Community Center & Theatre
 City of Hermosa Beach Citywide Disabled Parking Report, dated June 13, 2017 (Creative Design Associates & Martin Brothers Construction Services)  Hermosa Beach On-Street Disabled Parking Report, dated June 13, 2017 (Creative Design Associates & Martin Brothers Construction Services)  Citywide Building and Facilities Condition Assessment CIP 13-664 ADA Sidewalks and Curb Ramps Evaluation, dated May 2015 (CivilSource, Inc.)

1. 2015 City of Hermosa Beach Draft Transition Plan
The City of Hermosa Beach Title II Comprehensive Evaluation and Transition Plan, Revision 1, dated September 24, 2015 (the “2015 Draft Transition Plan”), was prepared by ADA Inspection Plus, LLC. (See Attachment A of Appendix B.) The report was prepared to assist the City with identifying physical barriers of accessibility and to develop barrier removal solutions that will facilitate the opportunity of access to all 1384
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 18
individuals. The 2015 Draft Transition Plan describes the process by which facilities were evaluated for compliance with the ADA; presents the findings of that evaluation; and provides recommendations to ensure compliance. Like this 2022 ADA Transition Plan, the report also provides an overview of the obligation public entities have to develop a Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and outlines the plan development process. Additionally, the report describes the differences between policies and programs and establishes the relationship between physical and programmatic barriers to accessibility.

2. 2015 Draft Transition Plan Evaluation Reports – Main Public Facilities To prepare the 2015 Draft Transition Plan, ADA Inspection Plus, LLC also prepared Program Accessibility Evaluation Reports for the City’s main public facilities. They are attached to this report as indicated in the chart below.

Facility Address
Report
Date Attachment
13th St. Parking Structure
NW corner of 13th &
Hermosa Ave 3/18/2015 A‐1
Clark Building 861 Valley Drive 3/18/2015 A‐2
Valley Park Building 2521 Valley Drive 4/8/2015 A‐3
Kiwanis Shared Building Exterior Access and
Parking 2515 Valley Drive 4/8/2015 A‐4
Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club   2515 Valley Drive 4/8/2015 A‐5 Hermosa Beach Rotary Club 2515 Valley Drive 4/8/2015 A‐6 Fire Department 540 Pier Ave 4/21/2015 A‐7
Police Department 540 Pier Ave 4/21/2015 A‐8
City Hall 1315 Valley Drive 4/21/2015 A‐9
Civic Center Exterior
Same as City Hall, Fire, and
Police 4/21/2015 A‐10
City Yard 679 Valley Drive 5/6/2015 A‐11
Base 3 Building
NE corner of 11th and
Valley Drive 5/6/2015 A‐12
South Park Building 425 Valley Drive 5/6/2015 A‐13
Community Center & Theater 710 Pier Ave 5/6/2015 A‐14
A summary assessment of these evaluation reports, which include ADA Inspection Plus, LLC’s findings, is provided on pages 10 through 58 of the 2015 Draft Transition Plan.

As shown in the summary assessment, we have added an “Updated Estimated Cost” column denoted in red font.
1385
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 19

ESTIMATED COST
The total estimated cost to correct all the violations noted in the evaluation reports is on the order of approximately $1,150,468.

3. Citywide Disabled Parking Evaluation Reports - Off-Street Parking (Parking Lots)
The Hermosa Beach Citywide Disabled Parking report, dated June 13, 2017, was prepared by Creative Design Associates and Martin Brothers Construction Services (CDA-MBCS) (the “City-Wide Disabled Parking Report”). (See Attachment B of Appendix B.) The City of Hermosa Beach engaged the consultant to review eight (8) City-owned parking lots for compliance with applicable accessibility standards. The standards CDA-MBCS used in their evaluation included the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADAS) and the 2016 California Building Code (CBC). The report provided recommendations to correct non-compliant conditions. Cost to correct the noncompliant conditions was not provided.

CDA-MBCS team members evaluated the City parking facilities shown in the chart below, and prepared reports for each. An executive summary of these evaluation reports, which include CDA-MBCS’s findings, is provided on pages 1 through 21 of the Citywide Disabled Parking Report.

Off‐Street Parking Facility Address Report Date
Parking Lot A
1101 Hermosa (NW corner of 11th &
Hermosa Ave) 2/8/2017
Parking Lot B 59 13th Court 2/8/2017
Parking Lot L
Between 2nd St. and Herondo St. along
Valley 3/11/2017
Parking Lot M
Between 2nd and 3rd Street South of
PCH 2/8/2017
Parking Lot N 800 4th Street 2/9/2017 & 2/28/2017
Parking Lot O Kiwanis Club 2/9/2017
Parking Lot R Greenwood Park 2/9/2017
Access, Inc. found that many of the non-compliant conditions noted by CDA-MBCS have been corrected and updated the evaluation reports with edits in red, starting on page 22 of the Citywide Disabled Parking Report. Additionally, Access, Inc. provided estimated costs to correct the remaining non-compliant conditions. 1386
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 20

ESTIMATED COST
The total estimated cost to correct all remaining violations noted in the evaluation reports is on the order of approximately $850,000.

4. Hermosa Beach On-Street Disabled Parking Report
Creative Design Associates and Martin Brothers Construction Services (CDA-MBCS) also evaluated selected on-street accessible parking spaces and provided a report dated, June 13, 2017 (“On-Street Disabled Parking Report”). (See Attachment C of Appendix B.) CDA-MBCS reviewed 28 accessible residential parking spaces for compliance with applicable accessibility standards (see chart below). A detailed breakdown of the parking space locations, assessment of compliance, and recommended corrections can be found on pages 11 through 21 of the On-Street Disabled Parking Report. No cost estimates were provided.

Parking   Location Inspection Date
On‐street parking east of PCH 1050 1st Street 6/13/2017 On‐street parking east of PCH 436 Gentry 6/13/2017
On‐street parking east of PCH 439 Ocean View 6/13/2017
On‐street parking east of PCH 1105 3rd St. 6/13/2017
On‐street parking east of PCH 1115 17th St. 6/13/2017
On‐street parking east of PCH 1228 6th St. 6/13/2017
On‐street parking east of PCH 505 Hallowell 6/13/2017
On‐street parking east of PCH 1507 Golden St. 6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 1823 Valley Park Ave 6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 2162 Circle Drive 6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 731 10th St 6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 245 33rd St 6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 616 7th St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 1441 Monterey   6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 823 Monterey   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 412 Manhattan   6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 1811 Manhattan   6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 2440 Silverstrand   6/13/2017 1387
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 21
On‐street parking west of PCH 218 28th St. 6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 360 33rd St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 611 7th St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 3010 Hermosa Ave.   6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH 74 18th St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 67 16th St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 60 10th St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 32 10th St. 6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH  21 4th St.   6/13/2017
On‐street parking west of PCH 841 Manhattan Ave. 6/13/2017 On‐street parking west of PCH  2006 PCH 6/13/2017
The standards used in the CDA-MBCS evaluation included the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, the 2016 California Building Code, and the proposed 2011 Public Rights-of-Way Guidelines published by the U.S. Access Board (2011 PROWAG). In general, there is not one specific accessibility regulation or code that directly applies to on-street parking areas. The proposed PROWAG addresses only spaces that are marked or metered and have yet been adopted by the DOJ, which means they are not mandatory but are instead “best practices” guidelines. However, it was the consultant’s professional opinion that the on-street parking areas are required to be made accessible due to case law, even in the absence of specific scoping or technical requirements that directly apply.

Since the date of the CDA-MBCS on-street disabled parking report, the City has added additional on-street accessible parking spaces in the downtown district and updated many of the existing on-street accessible parking spaces with new striping and signage.

The report also provided guidance on receiving request by businesses and residences for additional on-street accessible parking spaces.

ESTIMATED COST
The total estimated cost to correct all remaining violations noted in the evaluation reports is on the order of approximately $52,500.

5. Citywide Facilities Assessment of Sidewalks and Curb Ramps 1388
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 22
The Citywide Building and Facilities Condition Assessment CIP 13-664 ADA Sidewalks and Curb Ramps Evaluation report, dated May 2015, was prepared by Civil Source, Inc. (“Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Report”). (See Attachment D of Appendix B.) This assessment covered the pedestrian facilities for all streets including major arterials, collectors, and residential streets. The field data was input for each segment regarding physical characteristics, accessibility criteria, existing barriers, and any additional comments by the data collector. The criteria relating to accessibility included sidewalk width and alignment, the presence of curb ramps, ramp width and ramp slope. A detailed table of the numerous sidewalks and curb ramps evaluated for the Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Report begins on page 4 of that report.

Pedestrian facility improvements are mainly funded through the local Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Gas Tax Revenue Funds, the Regional Transportation Authority, and federally funded programs. Analyzing the design characteristics that promote accessibility will help jurisdictions to meet basic standards for accessibility. It also aids the process of prioritizing improvements and funding. Identifying these deficiencies will aid the City as it meets the needs of all sidewalk users.

In addition, pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 12.08, most persons constructing commercial, industrial, and residential development projects must make improvements to the right-of-way. Section 12.08.010 states:

Except as provided in Section 12.08.020, any owner, lessee or agent or any other person or persons constructing or arranging for the construction of: (a) any commercial or industrial building or residential dwelling structure, or addition thereto, exceeding four hundred (400) square feet in floor area, or (b) any accessory building greater than fifty percent (50%) of the square footage of the existing main building, shall provide for the construction of Portland cement concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks, street pavement between the gutter and center line of the street fronting the property, and pavement between the edge of pavement and center line of any alley adjoining the property, in accordance with the standard specifications of the City Engineer. (Ord. 02-1219, §1, May 2002).

Due to the number of curb ramps, driveways and sidewalks that have been improved since the report was authored, and potential changes to site conditions over time, it is recommended the Citywide Buildings and Facilities Condition Assessment CIP13-664 ADA Sidewalks & Curb Ramps Evaluation, dated May 2015, be updated or replaced with a new report.
1389
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 23

ESTIMATED COST
The total estimated cost to correct all remaining violations noted in the evaluation reports is on the order of approximately $43,000,000. A new assessment report is estimated to cost approximately $150,000. The resulting combined cost is approximately $43,150,000.

E. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
The updated costs to correct each violation listed in the ADA Assessment Reports were based on an average inflation rate of 2.21% per year. The updated costs do not include design, inspection, project and/or construction management and any contingencies.

Citywide Building Facilities $ 1,150,500.00
Citywide Disabled Parking (Off-Street) $ 850,000.00
Citywide Disabled Parking (On-Street) $ 52,500.00
Citywide Sidewalks and Curb Ramps $ 43,000,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 45,053,000.00
F. PARTICIPATION OF INTERESTED PERSONS
The City created and involved the Access Hermosa Working Group (AHWG) to help comment on the 2015 Draft Transition Plan. Formed by a prior City Manager, from 2015 to November 2019 the AHWG met approximately once per month to discuss ADA access concerns and made suggestions to City staff. In 2019, the AHWG was given the opportunity to comment on the 2015 Draft Transition Plan and submitted feedback to City staff. AHWG comments November 2019 are included in Appendix C of this report.

For a number of reasons beyond the City’s control (including exigencies created by the COVID-19 pandemic), adoption of the proposed plan was delayed. As the purpose of the AHWG had up to that time been fulfilled, the AHWG ceased meeting and would convene again, upon request of the City Manager, to accomplish final approval of the City’s transition plan.

G. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Appendix A to this report is the schedule to implement the corrections to the accessibility issues noted in this 2022 Transition Plan. The dates in the schedule are approximate and may change as funding becomes available and priorities may change over time.
1390
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 24
H. RECOMMENDATIONS
This report functions as the City’s 2022 Self-Evaluation and ADA Transition Plan (“2022 Transition Plan”). Access, Inc. recommends the following as the City continues to demonstrate its good faith commitment to achieve program accessibility in measurable steps and goals:

1. Evaluation Report and Code Updates - The 2015 Draft Transition Plan and its ADA self-evaluation reports were performed in 2015. The other evaluation reports are based on inspections performed in early 2015 through 2017.

However, the current California Building Code cycle is dated July 1, 2021. It is therefore recommended that prior to making alterations to existing buildings and facilities, a new assessment report(s) with current code requirements be provided by a licensed architect and/or California Access Specialist (CASp). As projects are created the design shall include the current codes that are applicable at the time of design.

2. Self-evaluation - The City should also perform self-evaluations of areas described in Section F.1 of Part I, above, including: (1) employment policies and practices, (2) notice to the public of ADA requirements, (3) website accessibility, (4) temporary event permits and (5) Emergency Operations Center and on-scene operations. It is recommended the City review and update the Self-Evaluation documents and Transition Plan every 3 to 4 years.

3. Programs, Services and Activities - Staff must continue to evaluate the City’s programs, services and activities to ensure compliance.

4. Other City Facilities - Additional ADA assessments are required for City facilities that are not detailed in this 2022 ADA Transition Plan, including:
a. City Parks.
b. Buildings that are leased to Title III entities that provide public accommodations such as the storage facility adjacent to City Hall and the County Library.
c. Public buildings that are not occupied – the City should identify these buildings and indicate their current use. Such buildings that are not in use do not require ADA assessment reports, although if the use of the building(s) changes in the future, an ADA assessment is strongly recommended.
1391
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 25

5. Commitment - Provide public notice of ADA requirements applicable to City (e.g., post notice at City Hall and on City website) and maintain commitment to access compliance.

6. Funding – the City has dedicated approximately $600,000 within its FY 2021-2022 budget for ADA consulting services and Capital Improvements Improvement Projects that include ADA accessibility components. It should continue to dedicate funds as they are available in future budget cycles to advance recommendations in this report.

As funding becomes available, it is recommended that priority be given to completing self-evaluations of programs and services (including (1) employment policies and practices, (2) notice to the public of ADA requirements, (3) website accessibility, (4) temporary event permits and (5) Emergency Operations Center and on-scene operations) and developing a more detailed implementation schedule for curb ramps and walkways serving government buildings and facilities, transportation, and places of public accommodation (e.g., bus stops), followed by walkways serving other areas.

7. Implementation - Update the implementation dates in the ADA reports and Transition Plan Schedule as budget and priority dictates.

8. On-going Maintenance Assessment - Periodic assessment related to the proper maintenance of all accessible features is required. This can be accomplished through future updates to facilities assessment report, sidewalk/curb ramp inventories, etc. The City also has a GoHermosa system for residents to report issues.

FINAL COMMENTS
The services provided by Access, Inc. to create this Transition Plan, a vast majority of which is based on reports prepared by other consultants, does not guarantee the completeness nor the correctness in the reports provided in this document. This report is a living document and should be updated as accessible features are brought into compliance with the ADA and CBC Standards.
1392
City of Hermosa Beach February 8, 2022
On-Call ADA Consultant Services Page 26
Appendix A – Implementation Schedule
Appendix B – ADA Evaluation Reports
A. Hermosa Beach Draft Transition Plan (ADA Plus LLC)
A.1 Parking Structure (ADA Plus LLC)
A.2 Clark Building (ADA Plus LLC)
A.3 Valley Park Building (ADA Plus LLC)
A.4 Kiwanis Shared Building Exterior Access & Parking (ADA Plus LLC) A.5 Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club (ADA Plus LLC)
A.6 Hermosa Beach Rotary Club (ADA Plus LLC)
A.7 Fire Department (ADA Plus LLC)
A.8 Police Department (ADA Plus LLC)
A.9 City Hall (ADA Plus LLC)
A.10 Civic Center Exterior (ADA Plus LLC)
A.11 City Yard (ADA Plus LLC)
A.12 Base 3 (ADA Plus LLC)
A.13 South Park (ADA Plus LLC)
A.14 Community Center & Theatre (ADA Plus LLC)
B. City of Hermosa Beach Citywide Disabled Parking (Creative Design Associates & Martin Brothers Construction Services)
C. Hermosa Beach On-Street Disabled Parking (Creative Design Associates & Martin Brothers Construction Services)
D. Citywide Building and Facilities Condition Assessment CIP 13-664 ADA Sidewalks and Curb Ramps Evaluation (CivilSource, Inc.) Appendix C – Access Hermosa Working Group Comments, November 2019 ATTACHMENTS:
1393
Appendix A – Implementation Schedule
1394
2022‐2025 2026‐2030 2031‐2035 2036‐2040 2041‐2045 2046‐2050 2051‐2055 2056‐2060 2061‐2065 2066‐2070 2071‐2075 2076‐2080 Parking Structure Building
Clark Building BuildingValley Park Building Building
Kiwani's Building Shared Exterior Building
Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club BuildingHermosa Beach Rotary Club Building Fire Department Building
Police Department Building
City Hall Building BuildingCivic Center Exterior Building City Yard BuildingBase 3 Building BuildingSouth Park Building Building Community Center & Theatre BuildingCity Parks Parks
Citywide Disabled Parking (Parking Lots) Parking
Citywide On‐Street Disabled Parking Parking
Citywide Sidewalk & Curb Ramps Right‐of‐Way
City of Hermosa Beach
ADA Transition Plan ‐ Implementation Schedule ‐ DRAFT
February 8, 2022
Facility Name Facility Type Year
Appendix A
1395
Appendix C – Access Hermosa Working Group Comments,
November 2019
1396
1 Appendix C

ADA TRANSITION PLAN COMMENTS
BY

ACCESS HERMOSA
November 2019
13th Street - Parking Structure
The Access Hermosa Work group has the following comments:
• Entrance into parking structure is too steep (2% grade change). • Handicap entrance (1), cars only, no sidewalk to structure (no ramp provided). • 10 handicap spots in total (4 L2, 3 L2, 3 L4).
• Trashcans (L4) in the way of path of travel.
• Hotel parking located at the subterranean level/bottom level (one handicap space for hotel guests/employees only).
• No sidewalk/walkway for handicap access for those coming from the bottom floor to L2.

Valley Park Building - 2521 Valley Dr.

The Access Hermosa Work Group has the following comments:
• Picnic areas need better sidewalk access. Most of the picnic areas are in the grass which make it very difficult for people in wheel chairs, strollers, and walkers to reach. • All stairways to the park need ramps with handrails.
• The park needs solar lights. While the park does have lights at night, they only light up some areas of the park. Solar lights would provide more lighting to the park at night and would prevent suspicious activity.
• BBQ areas need at least one picnic table that are lower for wheel chair access. • All BBQ areas need to be leveled so wheel chairs can have access to the picnic areas. • All sinks in the picnic areas need to have wheel chair access. • At least one BBQ needs to be lowered for wheel chair access.

The Access Hermosa Work Group has the following comments regarding the men's and women's restrooms:
• Park restrooms all need to provide disable access for adults and children. • The bathrooms need an outside camera for monitoring bathroom activity.

Kiwani's Building South - 2515 Valley Dr.

The Access Hermosa Work Group has the following comments:
• The building needs disable bathroom repairs and upgrades including wheel chair access with upgraded door and push button door access.
• The front door is wide enough for wheel chairs access but the doors need push button door opener.
• A handrail may be needed on one side of the entrance. • The south side door needs to have a ramp with a door wide enough for a wheel chair access this door leads to the kitchen.
1397
2 Appendix C
• The north side door needs a ramp with hand rails leading outside. • Next to the north side door, more disable parking is needed. • The street parking on Valley Dr. needs disable parking near the stairs. The stairs needs a ramp for wheel chair access and with handrails.

Kiwani's Building North (Hermosa Beach Rotary) - 2515 Valley Dr.

The Access Hermosa Work Group has the following comments:
• The building has two front doors and both need to be upgraded to larger doors for wheel chair access with push button door openers.
• Bathrooms need to be upgraded with wider doors with push button door openers. • Disable parking is needed on Valley Dr. in front of the Rotary Building. • Stairs in front of the Rotary entrance needs a ramp with rails. • Area in front of the Rotary Building Northside walkway near a tree needs to be leveled so wheel chairs do not get off the walkway.
• Rotary building only has outdoor access from the front doors in case of a fire a back door access maybe needed.

City Hall Building - 1315 Valley Dr.

The Access Hermosa Work Group has the following comments:
• Automatic door needs to be fixed.
• Ramp to City Hall is too far away (East of Library – difficult to see ramp if you park in front of City Hall).

Base 3 Building - 11th Street & Valley Dr.

The Access Hermosa Work Group has the following comments:
• There are 2 ADA parking spaces in the southwest corner of the parking lot and 1 ADA parking space curbside on 11th street west of the building. • There is a ramp from the 2 spaces in the lot but it leads to a very long and serpentine sidewalk path to the main entrance on the east side of the building. • There is no painted path anywhere on the premises.
• The curbside space also has no painted path.
• On the east side of the building there is the main entrance, a 36" door with appropriate clearance, but no opening device.

South Park Building - 425 Valley Dr.

The Access Hermosa Work group had the following comments:
• Portions of the sidewalk need leveling.
• Park tables need to be raised.
• The BBQ need to be lowered.
• The bathrooms need major disable remodeling.
• Looking at the building from the lower front, the stairs to the right need a ramp.

Community Center and Theatre – 710 Pier Avenue
The Access Hermosa Work Group had the following comments:
• Entrance door 1 has an automatic door, which closes slowly enough to allow a wheelchair to get through safely. The lip is safe to rollover.
• The doors for the men’s and women’s restrooms in the Main Building and entrance doors 2, 4, and 6 are not automatic. The doors close too fast. The lips are safe to rollover. 1398
3 Appendix C
• Entrance door 4 does not have a ramp, which makes it wheelchair inaccessible. • Entrance doors 3 and 8 do not automatically open. These doors close too fast to allow a wheelchair to get through safely. The lips are safe to rollover. • Entrance door 7 does not automatically open. The door closes slowly enough, and the lip is safe to rollover.
• Entrance door 5 automatically closes. It closes slow enough to allow a wheelchair to get through safely. The lip is safe to rollover.
• The south corridor door from the theatre does not automatically close. It closes too fast to allow a wheelchair to get through safely. The lip is okay to rollover. • The museum entrance and exit doors were locked, so an assessment was not possible. 1399
Appendix B – ADA Evaluation Reports
A. Hermosa Beach Draft Transition Plan (ADA Plus LLC)
1400
City of Hermosa Beach
Title II Comprehensive Evaluation and Transition Plan
Adopted
(Date)
REVISION 1 09/24/2015
1401
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
Table of Contents
A. Introduction

1. Summary
a) Federal Accessibility Requirements
b) Title II Requirements
c) Purpose of the Self-Evaluation
d) Purpose of the Transition Plan
e) State of California Five Phases of Access Compliance (1) PHASE I: COMMITMENT Agency Head or Department Director demonstrates a commitment to Access Compliance.
(2) PHASE II: SELF-EVALUATION Complete Self-Evaluation and develop Transition Plan to identify and resolve accessibility issues. (3) PHASE III: TRANSITION Prepare budget and correction plan to submit to Department of Finance (DOF) for approval.
(4) PHASE IV: IMPLEMENTATION Implement all items in the SelfEvaluation and remove structural noncompliance items of the Transition Plan.
(5) PHASE V: ONGOING SUPPORT Continue involvement and
resolution of all problems and issues related to ADA. Provide periodic assessment related to the proper maintenance of all accessfeatures B. Self-Assessment

1. Introduction

2. Findings
a) Parking Structure
b) Clark Building
c) Valley Park Building
d) Kiwanis Shared Exterior
e) Kiwanis South
f) Kiwanis North
g) Fire Department
h) Police Department
i) City Hall
j) Civic Center Exterior
k) City Yard
l) Base 3
m) South Park
n) Community Center & Theatre
2 | P a g e
1402
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
C. Transition Plan

1. Facilities
a) Barrier Removal Priorities
b) Prioritizing Access
c) Priorities for Barrier Removal within Facilities
d) Transition Plan for Facilities
e) Phasing Schedule for Facilities
D. Pedestrian Rights-of-Way (PROW)

1. Surveys of Existing PROW Conditions

2. Pedestrian Rights-of-Way Prioritization

3. Time Period for Pedestrian Rights-of-Way Improvements

4. PROW Construction Details

5. Accessibility during construction

6. Street or Sidewalk Closure

7. On-Street Accessible Parking

8. Citizen Request Process
3 | P a g e
1403
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
A. Introduction

1. Summary
The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) enacted on July 26, 1990, is a Federal Civil Rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. The ADA consists of five titles providing protections in the following areas: Title I – Employment, Title II - State and Local Government Services, Title III - Public Accommodations, Title IV – Telecommunications, Title V - Miscellaneous Provisions. Title II of ADA pertains to the programs, activities, and services provided by public entities, such as State departments of transportation. The ADA states that its purpose is to provide a "clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities." Congress emphasized that the ADA seeks to dispel stereotypes and assumptions about disabilities and to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for people with disabilities. Title II of ADA provides that, “…no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity” (42 USC. Sec. 12132; 28 CFR. Sec. 35.130). A public entity may not deny the benefits of its programs, activities, and services to individuals with disabilities because its facilities are inaccessible. In other words, a public entity's services, programs, or activities, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. This standard, known as "program accessibility," applies to all existing facilities of a public entity. The ADA states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities.

This report will assist City of Hermosa Beach to identify physical barriers of accessibility and to develop barrier removal solutions that will facilitate the opportunity of access to all individuals. This 2015 plan describes the process by which facilities were evaluated for compliance with the ADA; presenting the findings of that evaluation; and providing recommendations to ensure compliance. This section provides an overview of the requirements for developing the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and outlines the plan development process. Subsequent sections will describe and evaluate policies and programs and will establish the relationship between physical and programmatic barriers to accessibility

2. Federal Accessibility Requirements
The Department of Justice published revised regulations for Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 "ADA" in the Federal Register on September 15, 2010. These regulations adopted revised, enforceable accessibility standards called the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design "2010 Standards" or "Standards". The 2010 Standards set minimum requirements – both scoping and technical – for newly designed and constructed or altered State and local government facilities, public accommodations, and commercial facilities to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. Adoption of the 2010 Standards also establishes a revised reference point for Title II entities that choose to make structural changes to existing facilities to meet their program accessibility requirements; and it establishes a similar reference for Title III entities undertaking readily 4 | P a g e
1404
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
achievable barrier removal. The Department is providing this document with the official 2010 Standards in one publication. The document includes: The 2010 Standards for State and local governments, which consist of the Title II regulations at 28 CFR 35.151 and the 2004 ADAAG at 36 CFR part 1191, appendices B and D; The 2010 Standards for public accommodations and commercial facilities, which consist of the Title III regulations at 28 CFR part 36, subpart D, and the 2004 ADAAG at 36 CFR part 1191, appendices B and D. The Department has assembled into a separate publication the revised regulation guidance that applies to the Standards. The Department included guidance in its revised ADA regulations published on September 15, 2010. This guidance provides detailed information about the Department’s adoption of the 2010 Standards including changes to the Standards, the reasoning behind those changes, and responses to public comments received on these topics. The document, Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, can be downloaded from www.ADA.gov
a) Title II Requirements
Title II of the ADA covers programs, activities, and services of public entities. It is divided into two subtitles, subtitle A of title II, which is implemented by the Department of Justice's title II regulation. Subtitle B, covering public transportation, and the Department of Transportation's regulation implementing that subtitle.

Subtitle A is intended to protect qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of disability in the services, programs, or activities of all State and local governments. It additionally extends the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of disability established by section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, to all activities of State and local governments, including those that do not receive Federal financial assistance. By law, the Department of Justice's title II regulation adopts the general prohibitions of discrimination established under section 504, and incorporates specific prohibitions of discrimination from the ADA.

Subtitle B is intended to clarify the requirements of section 504 for public transportation entities that receive Federal financial assistance. Also it extends coverage to all public entities that provide public transportation, whether or not they receive Federal financial assistance. It establishes detailed and complex standards for the operation of public transit systems, including commuter and intercity rail (AMTRAK). The Department of Transportation is responsible for the implementation of the second subtitle of Title II and issued a regulation implementing that subtitle. Public entity. A public entity covered by title II is defined as -- 1) Any State or local government; 2) Any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or local government; or 3) Certain commuter authorities as well as AMTRAK.

As defined, the term "public entity" does not include the Federal Government. Title II, therefore, does not apply to the Federal Government, which is covered by sections 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

Title II is intended to apply to all programs, activities, and services provided or operated by State and local governments. Currently, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act only applies to programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. Because many State and local government operations, such as courts, licensing, and legislative facilities and proceedings do not receive Federal funds, they are beyond the reach of section 504.
5 | P a g e
1405
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
In some cases it is difficult to determine whether a particular entity that is providing a public service, such as a library, museum, or volunteer fire department, is in fact a public entity. Where an entity appears to have both public and private features, it is necessary to examine the relationship between the entity and the governmental unit to determine whether the entity is public or private. Factors to be considered in this determination include --
1) Whether the entity is operated with public funds; 2) Whether the entity's employees are considered government employees; 3) Whether the entity receives significant assistance from the government by provision of property or equipment; and 4) Whether the entity is governed by an independent board selected by members of a private organization or a board elected by the voters or appointed by elected officials.
b) Purpose of the Self-Evaluation
Title II regulations also require public entities, by January 1993, to evaluate their current services, policies and practices, and their effects, that "do not or may not meet the requirements [of Title II of the ADA],” and if modification of services, policies, and practices is needed to achieve compliance, make the necessary modifications. Unlike transition plans, the regulations require selfevaluation plans to be developed by every public entity regardless of the number of employees it has. The regulations require public entities to provide an opportunity for the public to participate by submitting comments on self-evaluation plans, and public entities with 50 or more employees are required to keep these plans on file for three years for public inspection, along with a list of the interested people consulted in developing the plan, a description of the areas examined, and the problems identified, and a description of any modifications made. As with transition plans, agencies that already completed self-evaluation plans under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act are required to draft a self-evaluation plan and comply with the plan requirements only for those policies and practices that were not included in the agency's Section 504 plan. c) Purpose of Transition Plan
The development of a Transition Plan is a requirement of the federal regulations implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which requires that all organizations receiving federal funds make their programs available without discrimination toward people with disabilities. The Act, which has become known as the "civil rights act" of persons with disabilities, states that: No otherwise qualified handicapped individual in the United States shall, solely by reason of handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. (Section 504). The Transition Plan, as required by 28 CFR

35.150 (d), must include at a minimum, the following: Identification of the physical barriers that limit accessibility to the public entity’s programs, services, or activities for people with disabilities, Description of the methods to be used to make the facilities accessible, A schedule for making the necessary modifications, including a yearly schedule and, The name and contact information for the public official responsible for implementation of the Transition Plan. As required by Title II of ADA, 28 CFR. Part 35 Sec. 35.105 and Sec. 35.150,
6 | P a g e
1406
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
d) State of California Five Phases of Access Compliance (1) PHASE I: COMMITMENT Agency Head or Department Director demonstrates a commitment to Access Compliance.

ADA Coordinator
Identifying an ADA Coordinator: This individual should: Communicate with DOR to complete the mandatory Self-Evaluation. If necessary, a contract may be initiated with an access consultant to facilitate the process. Recommend necessary changes to policies affecting people with disabilities including a complaint process. Designate an individual to resolve program access issues including alternative format requests and equivalent facilitation. This may be the ADA Coordinator. Personnel specified above should perform periodic assessments of ADA compliance status committing to continuous improvement and proper maintenance of accessibility programs and services including: - Revising forms and documents; - Modifying emergency evacuation plans; - Identifying training needs within the organization to prevent discrimination. Promote the establishment of the departmental Disability Advisory Committee as an independent body dedicated to ensuring equal treatment for persons with disabilities.

Accessibility Specialist CGC 4459.5
BUILDING OR FACILITY: Identifying the agency official responsible for the Self-Evaluation/Transition Plan project. Designating an Accessibility Specialist to monitor renovation and construction projects identified in the Self-Evaluation phase. Once established, this position will be responsible to: - Determine access compliance status of all leased buildings or minor capital outlay projects. - Assist the project leader in identifying barriers while completing the Self-Evaluation. - Produce a Transition Plan effectively eliminating all barriers identified in the Self-Evaluation. - Ensure that an employees' needs assessment is completed and delivered to the architectural professional to be incorporated into the construction design. - Submit complete and correct project packages to DSA for plan review and approval (see Project Submittal Checklist - www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov/projectsubmittalprocess/ checklist.htm). - Monitor barrier removal and verified report as each phase of work progresses.

Collaboration with a licensed California architect as needed is expected. (2) PHASE II: SELF-EVALUATION Complete Self-Evaluation and develop Transition Plan to identify and resolve accessibility issues.

ADA Coordinator
EVALUATE PROGRAMS AND SERVICES: Evaluate program accessibility (1) Fill out Self-Evaluation survey to identify program accessibility needs. (2) Develop Transition Plan to resolve issues and remove barriers within each program. (3) Establish timelines for completion of modifications identified in Transition Plan. (4) Establish procedures for follow up to ensure proper maintenance of access features. (5) Retain records of Self-Evaluation on-file for public inspection and comment for 3 years. Solicit individual input from employees with disabilities to ensure that their needs and expectations are met through this process. Consult with departmental Disability Advisory Committee regarding issues affecting persons with disabilities. Provide design guidance to Accessibility Specialist or architect developing the access plan. Establish an evacuation plan that includes provisions for persons with disabilities. Evaluate all policies, programs, services, activities, practices and privileges to comply with ADA requirements. Organize disability awareness and sensitivity training for all employees. Provide specialized training for supervisors and managers. Establish multi-level complaint process and grievance procedure.
7 | P a g e
1407
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
Accessibility Specialist CGC 4459.5
BUILDING OR FACILITY: With guidance from the Accessibility Specialist, describe in detail the physical obstacles that limit program or activity accessibility by individuals with disabilities. Begin to evaluate the cost, timeframe and issues associated with the removal of barriers discovered by the survey. DSA is requiring facility owners to confer with qualified universal design consultants before completing the Transition Plan and subsequent architectural drawings.
(3) PHASE III: TRANSITION Prepare budget and correction plan to submit to Department of Finance (DOF) for approval.

ADA Coordinator
BUDGET PROGRAMS AND SERVICES: After all comments are compiled and considered, the published Self-Evaluation becomes the foundation for the access compliance Transition Plan. Programmatic collaboration on the completion of these plans is available through DOR. Architectural guidance is available through DSA. The Transition Plan describes all corrections needed and the timeframe within which the project will be completed. When proposal is complete, a budget item is prepared for submission to DOF for approval.

Accessibility Specialist CGC 4459.5
BUILDING OR FACILITY: The Accessibility Specialist coordinates the completion of the structural elements of the Transition Plan by providing the architect/designer with a report on the following: - Describe in detail the methods used to achieve facility accessibility; this includes physical alterations, program modifications and assignment changes. - Provide an opportunity for comments from employees, the DAC, the disability community and the general public. - Produce a timeline for achieving access compliance. - Initiate development of the architectural plans for the needed modifications. Funding is allocated for the correction plan: - Major capital outlay projects must be approved through DOF. - Minor capital outlay and discretionary funds are identified through the departmental budgetary process. All surveys and mitigation plans must be reviewed and approved by: - DGS, Real Estate Design Services (RESD), if the building is state leased - The appropriate DSA Regional Office, if the building is state owned. Retain the final Transition Plan on file for public inspection (4) PHASE IV: IMPLEMENTATION Implement all items in the SelfEvaluation and remove structural noncompliance items of the Transition Plan.

ADA Coordinator
IMPLEMENT CHANGES IN PROGRAMS AND SERVICES: The implementation phase achieves the goals established in the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. - All barriers to programs, services and activities are removed. - Alternative formats and/or accommodations are employed. Examples: large print, audiotapes, electronic format, voice recognition, interpretive services. - Signage and other methods of communication are initiated to publicize the availability of these modifications and alternatives. - Initiate new policies and procedures developed during the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan phases and facilitated by plan implementation
Accessibility Specialist CGC 4459.5
BUILDING OR FACILITY: The implementation phase ensures that building or facility accessibility is achieved. - All physical barriers are removed from the facility. - All recommendations for modifications 8 | P a g e
1408
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
to achieve accessibility are implemented. Examples: paths of travel, restroom facilities, signage, automatic door openers and parking areas. - Each phase of the Transition Plan will be signed off as it is completed. - Once the project is finished, the signed Transition Plan will be kept on file for public inspection. When the project is finished, a verified report from a private architect is signed to indicate: - Mitigation of the previously existing conditions described in the Transition Plan. - The work performed complies with current code and policies adopted by DSA and/or DOR. (5) PHASE V: ONGOING SUPPORT Continue involvement and
resolution of all problems and issues related to ADA. Provide periodic assessment related to the proper maintenance of all accessfeatures ADA Coordinator
PROVIDE PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES: After the program and facility modifications based on the Transition Plan have been completed, the maintenance and quality control phase begins. - Complete a final report reflecting access compliance status and retain it on file for public inspection and comments. - Administer periodic evaluations of the agency's access compliance status. - Conduct scheduled maintenance of all access features. - Continue resolving all access related problems and issues as they surface. - Facilitate the inclusion of accessibility issues in all construction, modernization or facility repair projects.

Accessibility Specialist CGC 4459.5
BUILDING OR FACILITY: Maintain proper operation and upkeep of all accessibility features. - Adhere to the established maintenance schedule of all mechanical features. - Ensure that paths of travel are adequately maintained. - Ensure that accessibility features remain foremost concerns when alterations, modifications and new construction are contemplated. - Inspect all repairs or additions to the building or facility for operable accessibility features.

B. Self-Assessment

1. Introduction
In order to perform the required self-evaluation for the City of Hermosa Beach’s public facilities in regards to adherence to the Americans with Disabilities Act, a collection database was developed. A preliminary checklist was first created from the specific requirements for public facilities outlined in the Americans with Disabilities Act, to provide a starting point for the collection database. The selfevaluation consisted of visiting eleven public facilities within the City of Hermosa Beach: Base E, City Hall, City Yard, Clark Building, Community Center & Theatre, Kiwanis club-North Building, Kiwanis clubSouth Building, Parking Structure, Police & Fire Department, South Park, and Valley Park Building.

Aspects of each facility were observed, tested, and measured to ensure compliance with ADA Standards. What follows below is a conclusive summary assessment or evaluation of where the City of Hermosa Beach complies with ADA standards and where the City of Hermosa Beach needs further work in order to comply.

2. Findings (#1-High Priority-#4-Low Priority)
9 | P a g e
1409
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
a) Parking Structure
The Parking Structure is located on the NW corner of 13th St. and Hermosa Ave Violations:

Parking Structure
Pg. Ref.,
Item
Number
Code
Reference
Comments:

Recommendations:

Priority
(1-4)

UPDATED

ESTIMATED
COST
Implementation
date:

Exterior:

Site Arrival Points: Section 1 Cost Estimate: $5000 - For detectable warning devises only. $5,662.50 Accessible
Route
Pg. 6-7,
Item A
CBC 11B206East Access - From Hermosa Ave. (Cross Slopes violations).

West Access form Beach (Cross Slope / Curb Ramp
violations) At least one accessible route shall be provided within the
boundary of the site.
2 Detectable
Warning Devices
Pg. 7,
Item B
CBC 11B705.1.2.5Detectable warning devices shall be provided (36" minimum width) at hazardous vehicular areas per CBC only.
3 Overall Parking: Section 2 Cost Estimate: $500 - Signs Only. $566.25 Sufficient
Accessible
Parking
Pg. 9,
Item A
11B-208.1 Not Sufficient Accessible Parking Provided.

Provide proper number of ADA parking
spaces.
1 Sufficient Number
of Vanaccessible
Parking
Pg. 9,
Item B
CBC 11B208.2.4Findings - No Van Accessible Parking Provided.

Six or a fraction of six parking spaces shall be

VAN ACCESSIBLE
1 Tow Away Sign Pg. 10,
Item C
CBC 11B502.8Not Provided / Provide one at each driveway entrance. Provide a
new "Unauthorized Vehicle Tow Away" (R100B)
1 Level 3 –
Parking Spaces:

Section
3(B)
Cost Estimate: $9,000 - Charging station, Striping and Signage 10,192.50 Wheel stop or
Curb
Pg.19,
Item A.2.
11B-208.1 Non-Compliant
Provide Wheel Stop at PS 3.2 to prevent encroachment
on accessible route
1 Accessible spaces
properly
marked
Pg. 19-
20, Item
B.2.
11B-208.1 40" +/- all 3 signs. Missing "Minimum FINE $250" sign.

Mounting height of 60" min from ground surface to bottom of sign not
provided
2 Accessible Stall
Striping
Pg. 20-
22, Item
D.2.
11B-208.1 Length and width of Parking not done properly 3 Level 2 –
Parking Spaces:

Section
3(C)
Cost Estimate: $4000 - Slope modifications, Striping, Cane Protection & Signage. $1500 - To add at least (2) accessible parking spaces on the lower level parking.
$4,530.00
$1,698.75
Wheel Stop or
Curb
Pg. 25,
Item A.3.
11B-208.1 Non-Compliant.

Provide Wheel Stop to prevent encroachment into
accessible route.
1 Accessible Spaces
Properly
Marked
Pg. 25,
Item B.3.
11B-208.1 40" - 55" +/- all 3 signs on level 2.

Increase Height to 60”min from
ground
2 Accessible
Parking and
Adjacent aisle
Slope
Pg. 26,
Item C.3.

CBC 11B502.4

2.7% in Access Aisle.

Repave to be no greater than (2%) max slope
1 Accessible Stall
Striping
Pg. 27,
Item D.3
11B-208.1 88" +/- / Striping not measured 108" centerline to centerline.

See Level 3 Parking Spaces for requirements.
1 Path of Travel Pg. 28-
29, Item
E.3.
11B-307.2 Need a clear Path of Travel 1
Upper Level /
Hermosa Ave
Entrance/Exit:

Section
3(D)
Cost Estimate: $7000 - Design, striping, signs & slope modifications $7,927.50 Wheel Stop or
Curb
Pg. 30,
Item A.4.

CB
C
11B
-
502.7.1
Forced to walk behind vehicle other than their own. The spaces must be located so a person with a disability is not compelled go behind other parking spaces.
1 Accessible
Spaces Properly
Marked
Pg. 32,
Item B.4.
11B-208.1 Findings - 36" / Mounting height of 60" min from ground surface to bottom of sign not provided & Incorrect
Sign.
2 10 | P a g e 1410
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
Violations:

Parking Structure
Pg.

Ref.,
Item
Number
Code
Reference
Comments:

Recommendations:

Priority
(1-4)

UPDATED

ESTIMATED
COST
Implementation
date:

Accessible
Parking and
Adjacent aisle
Slope
Pg. 33,
Item C.4.
11B-208.1 Violations Found: Exceeds 1:48 (2%) in parking and/or access aisles (Findings - 2.4% / 3.0% / 3.5% / )
1 Accessible Stall
Striping
Pg. 34-
35,
Item
D.4.
11B-208.1 Findings - 96" / Striping not measured 108" centerline to centerline. Findings - Lines not painted BLUE. Typical all (4)
spaces. Findings - No Access Aisles provided
1 Curb Ramps: Section 4 Cost Estimate: $5000 - For North curb ramp approach from top. $5,662.50 Slope Pg. 36,
Item A
CBC 11B406Construction of this curb ramp does not allow for a complaint path of travel when entering the ramp from the north side. 2 Detectable
Warnings
Pg. 37,
Item B
CBC 11B406.5.12Findings - No Detectable Warning Devices provided See "Accessible Routes Exterior" section.
3 Accessible Routes
Exterior:

Section 5 Cost Estimate: $3000 - Replace concrete $3,397.50 Walks Pg. 38-
41,
Item A
11B-403 Cross slopes too great 2
Changes in
Level
Pg. 41-
42,
Item B
CBC 11B303
Findings - 1" change in elevation at sidewalk join 1
Elevator: Section 6 Cost Estimate: $2500 - For Landing and Door-jam identification. $2,831.25 Elevator Door
Landings and
Clear Floor
Space
Pg. 44,
Sectio
n A
11B-407.2 Findings - Level 3 elevator approach 3.9%
Clear Floor or Ground Space shall be provided at call
controls.
3 Elevator hoist
way
Pg. 44-
45,
Sectio
n B
11B407.2.3.1
Findings - Not Provided on first floor jams. These shall have a STAR to identify the "Main" floor.
2 11 | P a g e
1411
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
b) Clark Building
The Clark Building is located 861 Valley Dr.

Violations: Clark
Building
Pg. Ref.,
Item
Number
Code
Referenc
e
Comments: Priority
(1-4)

UPDATED

ESTIMATED
COST
Implementation
date:

Exterior Site Access:

Parking: Section 2 Cost Estimate: $500-signs only $566.25 Signage Pg.8, Item C CBC
11B502.8
Unauthorized Vehicle Tow Away Sign. Provide a new R100B sign with the proper information. Reposition Parking Spaces
2 Accessible Routes: Section 3 Cost Estimate: $6000 $6,795.00 Accessible Route Pg. 11, Item
A
CBC 11B502.7Parking is not placed to connect to the shortest possible accessible route to the accessible entrance/s.
1 Wheel Stop or
curb to prevent
vehicles from
walking surface
Pg. 11, Item B CBC
11B-502.7.1
Forced to walk behind vehicle other than their own. No
bumper or curb in place to prevent encroachment of cars.

Move the parking spaces out and provide an accessible
route in front of
the existing parking spaces.
1 International
Symbol of
Accessibility
Pg. 13-15,
Item C
2013 CBC
11B-502.6.

Incorrect Signs & Sign Height. Replace Signs and Place
at Proper Height and distance.
1 Spaces and
adjacent aisle
exceeding
1:48(2%)
Pg. 17-18,
Item D
CBC
11B502.4
Slope greater that 2%. Repave 1
Accessible Stall
Striping
Pg. 19-23,
Item E
CBC
11B.50
2 Striping not measured centerline to centerline. Stripe accessible parking space according to code.
1 Curb Ramps: Section 4 Cost Estimate: $5000- New curb ramp required $5,662.50 Slope Pg. 24-25,
Item A
CBC
11B- 406
Cross pedestrian traffic parallel to the street creates a cross slopes of 21%. This is a very dangerous condition. Need new Ramp
1 Bottom Turning
Space
Pg. 26, Item B CBC
11B406.3.2
Recommended modified layout for proper turning space. 2 Accessible Routes
Exterior:

Section 5 Cost Estimate: $6500 for new ramp with landings & railings. $7,361.25 Accessible routes
of Travel
Pg. 28-29,
Item B
CBC -
11B-206.2.2
No accessible route to Clark Field. Provide accessible route of travel to and from all accessible buildings and within accessible
facilities.
2 Changes in
Level
Pg. 29-31,
Item C
CBC
11B- 303
1" at top of ramp - Not on an accessible route -
hazardous condition for pedestrian ways need to be
leveled.
2 Ramps: Section 6 Cost Estimate: $7500 Ramp design/ $4500 for 5% max walk with 6" curb edge protection.
$8,493.75/
$5,096.25
Slope Pg. 33, Item A CBC
11B- 405

8.5% - 11.2% ramp slopes. New Ramp 1
Landings /
Ramps
Pg. 33, Item B CBC
11B405.7
Included in Slope 1
Railings / Curb Pg. 33, Item
C-F
CBC
11B405.8
Included in Slope. Ramps shall provide hand railing on
each side of ramp.
1 Stairways: Section 7 Cost Estimate: $3000 for railing and contrasting stripe. $3,397.50 Risers Pg. 36, Item
B
11B-504.2 Bottom riser is less than 4" / All rises are not equal. 4 Hand Railings Pg. 36, Item C 11B-505.2 No Hand railing provided - Ramp is recommended to be provided at this location as well. Handrails shall be provided on both sides of stairs and ramps.
4 Stair Striping Pg. 38, Item
D
11B-504.4.1 It is recommended to provide contrasting stripe. 4 Entrance Doors: Section 8 Cost Estimate: $3500 for door landing and door adjustments $3,963.75 12 | P a g e 1412
City of Hermosa Beach
Transition Plan
Violations: Clark
Buildin
Pg. Ref.,
Item
Number
Code
Reference
Comments: Priority
(1-4)

UPDATED

ESTIMATED
COST
Implementation
date:

Door Closure Pg. 39, Item
A
CBC 11B404.2.8.1
3 Seconds 90deg to12deg 3
Pull/Push Force Pg. 40, Item
B
CBC 11B404.2.9The pressure exceeds 5lbs on the left door leaf. It should be 5lbs after the release of the push bar.
3 Maneuvering
Space
Pg. 41-42,
Item C
CBC 11B4048.8% ramp in level maneuvering space. The floor or ground space within the required clearances shall be level and clear. 3 Threshold Pg. 39, Item
D
CBC 11B404.2.5Information Only: Provide or modify door threshold or raise maneuvering space so that the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2" lower than the top of the threshold of the doorway. Changes in level between 1/4" and 1/2" shall be beveled with a slope no greater than 1:2.
3 EXIT Sign Pg. 39, Item
E
CBC 11B703
Not provided. Provide tactile EXIT sign at exit doors. 3 Meeting Room
Door:

Section 9(A Cost Estimate: $200 $226.50
Door Hardware Pg. 45, Item
B.1
28 CFR
Part 36 App.

A - 4.13.9
Twist Type door knob on meeting room door. Exit door in kitchen has a twist door knob as well. Closet door has a twist door knob. It is recommended to provide a lever type door handle, mounted between 34" and 44" above finish floor. 2 Kitchen Door: Section 9(B Cost Estimate: $250 $283.13 Door Hardware Pg. 47, Item
A.2
28 CFR
Part 36 App.

A - 4.13.9
Twist Type door knob. It is recommended to provide a lever type door handle, mounted between 34" and 44" above finish floor. 2 Accessible
Routes
Interior:

Section 11 Cost Estimate: $250 - Relocate fire extinguisher cabinet $283.13 Obstacles in
Path of Travel
Pg. 51-52,
Item A
11B-307.2 Fire Extinguisher is in the path of travel. Relocate fire extinguisher cabinet.
3 Reach
Ranges for
Operable
Parts:

Section 12 Cost Estimate: $250 $283.13
Reach Range
Requirements