La Cañada Flintridge City Council
June 16, 2026

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
Approved
Maybe Funding Sources
No Gen Fund SB1 TDA Mea W Mea M Mea R Prop C AQMD
CC No. Description Total (01) (03) (05) (18) (27) (28) (29) (37) CM-02 Home Anti-Burglary Protection Program (PSC#1) 15,000 15,000 CM-06 E-Bikes for Specialized Operations (SH#2) 11,000 11,000 CM-07 Enhanced Automated License Plate Readers (SH#1) 29,750 29,750 CM-08 Flock License Plate Recognition Trailer (SH#4) 39,000 39,000 CM-11 Operational Support Vehicle 40,000 40,000
CM-12 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS/Drone) (SH#3) 16,000 16,000 CM-13 Citywide Evacuation Plan Development 180,000 180,000 CM-14 FD Battery-Powered Rescue Tool 15,000 15,000
CM-16 LCE Crossing Guard 18,300 18,300
CD-01 Housing Element Update Cnsltng Srvs 100,000 100,000 CD-04 Personal Protective Equip./Body Cams for CD staff 3,500 3,500 PW-01 Citywide Street Resurfacing 2,410,000 1,043,650 576,350 550,000 240,000 PW-02 Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs 166,960 150,000 16,960 PW-04 Miscellaneous Bridge Repairs 50,000 50,000
PW-06 Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs 75,000 75,000
PW-07 Miscellaneous Storm Drain Repairs 100,000 100,000 PW-09 Foothill Resurfacing & ADA Enh. Concept Plan 300,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 PW-10 Soundwall Phase V 75,000 0 75,000
PW-11 Hillard Safety Improvements 100,000 0 100,000
PW-12 Inverness Storm Drain & Resurfacing 100,000 0 100,000 PW-13 Green Alley II 105,000 0 105,000
PW-14 Citywide Bulk/Accelerated Street Resurfacing Study 100,000 100,000 PW-17 Angeles Crest Hwy at Green Lane Traffic Signal 250,000 250,000 PW-18 No Parking During Red Flag Program (105 signs) 75,000 75,000 PW-20 Pet Waste Stations 6,500 6,500
PW-22 Pedestrian Crossing - Fthl at Indiana (HSIP Cycle 12) 300,000 0 300,000 PW-23 City Vehicle 85,000 0 85,000
AD-01 ADA Compliance for Website CC Documents 15,000 15,000 AD-07 Memorial Park Playground Equipment 800,000 800,000 AD-08 Lanterman Auditorium Stage Floor Repair 17,250 17,250 AD-09 LCHS Pickleball Project 20,000 20,000
Total Approved $5,618,260 $3,169,950 $576,350 $16,960 $105,000 $725,000 $540,000 $400,000 $85,000 City of La Cañada Flintridge 150 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Home Anti-Burglary Protection Program
Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $40,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-6081
Background Property crime, including burglary, remains a concern for residents and business owners in La Cañada Flintridge. There are several effective strategies that can help reduce risk and improve security. These can include reinforcing vulnerable entry points like doors and windows, installing protective measures such as anti-burglary window film, or securing mailboxes with locks. Because burglars often look for easy access, taking a layered approach with multiple preventative measures can significantly deter criminal activity and enhance overall safety.

The Public Safety Commission identified this as their first priority for program funding.

Justification The Home Anti-Burglary Protection Program would be designed to support residents and businesses in La Cañada Flintridge in strengthening their properties against burglary. Property crime remains an ongoing concern, and taking proactive steps can significantly reduce risk. The program would be developed in collaboration with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, City staff, and the Public Safety Commission, to establish clear eligibility guidelines on qualifying purchases and installations effectively enhance property security such as anti-burglary window film or locking mailboxes. This coordinated approach will help align the programs with best practices in crime prevention.

Operating on a reimbursement basis, the requested $40,000 in funding will be used to offset the cost of eligible security improvements for property owners. By lowering financial barriers, the City aims to promote broader adoption of layered burglary prevention strategies, ultimately reducing property crime and fostering a safer, more secure community.

Fiscal Impact $40,000
Recurring Annual Cost None
Adopted $15,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 151 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title E-Bicycles (E-Bikes) for Specialized Operations Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $22,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-7101
Background The Sheriff’s Department has identified a need for E-Bikes for specialized operations.

E-Bikes provide a highly efficient and flexible option, particularly well-suited for special events and densely populated environments where traditional vehicles are limited by congestion, restricted access, or parking constraints. Their compact size and electric assist capability allows deputies to navigate crowds, park areas, and event perimeters quickly and quietly, improving response times while maintaining a visible law enforcement presence. This mobility enhances situational awareness and allows for rapid engagement or de-escalation in dynamic environments, all while reducing fatigue compared to standard bicycles.

From a budget and operational standpoint, E-Bikes offer a cost-effective alternative to full-sized patrol vehicles, with significantly lower acquisition, maintenance, and fuel costs. They also support community-oriented policing by enabling more approachable, face-to-face interactions between deputies and the public, which is especially valuable during special events. Additionally, their low environmental impact and minimal noise contribute to a safer and more enjoyable atmosphere, while still providing deputies with the speed and range needed to effectively manage crowds, monitor traffic flow, and respond to incidents in real time.

This is the Sheriff’s Department’s second priority.

Justification The Sheriff’s Department is requesting the purchase of four E-Bikes to be utilized by deputy personnel in support of specialized operations within the city. The E-Bikes vary in size to accommodate riders of different heights. The Sheriff’s Department identified the Bulls Sentinel 750 which is the latest model developed by Bulls in collaboration with the Los Angeles Police Department where these E-Bikes are currently in-service. These E-Bikes travel up to 28 mph with pedal-assist and are capable of carry the equipment deputies need to conduct bicycle enforcement operations. The cost of each E-Bike is $5397.00 which includes upfitting the unit with lights, sirens, and other required equipment. There is an annual service cost of approximately $375 per E-Bike.

The full funding of this request is recommended if approved to provide up to two twodeputy E-Bike teams to be deployed during large events as well as providing more sizing options for E-Bike availability for proper fit to the rider based on height. If partially funded, the Sheriff’s Department will attempt to order the average size (height) of its personnel who regularly are assigned to city service.

Fiscal Impact $22,000 for four (4) Bull Sentinel 750 E-Bikes OR $11,000 for two (2) Bull Sentinel 750 E-Bikes
Recurring Annual
Cost
$1,500 for four (4) Bull Sentinel 750 E-Bikes OR
$750 for two (2) Bull Sentinel 750 E-Bikes
Adopted $11,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 152 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Enhance Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Deployment Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $29,750
Account Number(s) 01-21-7101
Background In January 2023, the Sheriff’s Department notified the city that the ALPR system deployed on one patrol vehicle was at the end of its contracted five-year term and warranty period. At the request of the city, the Sheriff’s Department installed the legacy ALPR system into a newly purchased vehicle with an understanding from the city that hardware or software issues would not be covered and the city would replace the legacy system later. Currently, the Department and its vendor no longer support the legacy ALPR as hardware and software solutions have advanced in technology.

The Sheriff’s Department has identified the need to not only upgrade the single legacy ALPR deployment, but the need for additional ALPRs on vehicles assigned to patrol the city. The deployment of ALPRs on patrol vehicles represents a cost-effective, technology-driven enhancement to policing in the community, where traffic flow, commuter patterns, and residential safety are closely linked. Automated License Plate Reader systems automatically scan and analyze thousands of license plates per shift, comparing them in real time against databases of stolen vehicles, wanted subjects, and AMBER Alerts, significantly increasing deputy efficiency without requiring additional staffing. This automation allows deputies to focus on proactive policing while the system continuously monitors surrounding vehicles, acting as a force multiplier where a large percentage of crimes involve vehicle movement. From a budgetary standpoint, ALPR technology maximizes existing personnel resources by replacing manual plate checks with high-speed, continuous data collection, improving investigative capacity while minimizing long-term labor costs.

Beyond enforcement, ALPR-equipped patrol vehicles provide measurable benefits to driver safety and assist in reducing deputy-involved traffic collision auto liability. Additionally, real-time alerts allow deputies to quickly identify vehicles associated with reckless driving, suspended registration, or prior incidents, enhancing roadway safety through timely intervention. Automated License Plate Reader systems consistently demonstrate value in increasing stolen vehicle recovery rates and supporting investigations, reinforcing their role as a practical and scalable investment for improving both traffic safety and overall public safety in a fiscally responsible manner.

This is the Sheriff’s Department’s first priority.

Justification The Sheriff’s Department is requesting to upgrade the existing Vigilant ALPR deployed system on one Special Assignment Deputy vehicle and then to enhance the city’s deployment with the addition of four Vigilant ALPR systems. Two of the new units will be deployed onto the city’s 24/7 routine patrol deployed vehicles, one on the other Special Assignment Deputy vehicle, and the last additional unit will be installed on the Traffic Investigator’s vehicle who also conducts specialized traffic enforcement operations in the city.

Adopted $29,750
City of La Cañada Flintridge 153 FY 2026-27 Budget

Fiscal Impact $29,750 for five (5) ALPR units
OR
$17,850.00 upgrade the one legacy unit and enhance the deployment by adding two more ALPR
OR
$5,950 to upgrade the legacy ALPR system
Recurring Annual
Cost
$29,750 for five (5) ALPR units
OR
$17,850.00 upgrade the one legacy unit and enhance the deployment by adding two more ALPR
OR
$5,950 to upgrade the legacy ALPR system
City of La Cañada Flintridge 154 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Flock License Plate Reader (LPR) Speed Feedback Trailer & Traffic Analytics Package
Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $39,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-7101
Background The deployment of a Flock License Plate Recognition (LPR) trailer would provide the Sheriff’s Department with a flexible, rapiddeployment capability to enhance real-time intelligence and enforcement operations without requiring permanent infrastructure installation. As a mobile, solar-powered system, the trailer can be strategically positioned in response to evolving crime trends, special events, or community safety concerns. This adaptability enables immediate alerting for stolen or wanted vehicles while expanding surveillance coverage with minimal impact on existing staffing resources. Its portability and ease of redeployment make it a cost-effective and strategically valuable asset for both patrol and investigative functions.

In addition, the Flock LPR trailer generates valuable traffic data, including vehicle counts, travel times, and commonly used routes. This information provides an additional operational layer of situational awareness that can support both law enforcement and broader municipal traffic management needs.

This is the Sheriff’s Department fourth priority.

Justification The Flock LPR trailer offers significant operational and public safety benefits through both enforcement support and data collection capabilities. From a traffic enforcement perspective, the system helps identify high-traffic corridors, cut-through routes, and locations with recurring safety concerns. This allows for more targeted enforcement strategies and more efficient allocation of resources based on real-time and historical traffic patterns.

The visible presence of the trailer also serves as a deterrent to unsafe driving behavior, promoting improved roadway safety. The data collected can be used to support evidence-based decision-making for both patrol operations and traffic safety initiatives. Additionally, this asset may benefit the City’s Public Works Department by providing reliable traffic survey data useful for planning, infrastructure evaluation, and transportation analysis.

Fiscal Impact $39,000
Recurring Annual Cost $36,000
Adopted $39,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 155

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Operational Support Vehicle
Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $40,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-8231
Background To enhance investigative operations, the Sheriff’s Department has identified the need for an unmarked patrol support vehicle. This vehicle will provide the station’s Detective Bureau with increased surveillance capability and operational flexibility, allowing personnel to operate discreetly and blend into the surrounding environment. Such capability is critical during intelligence-gathering activities, where overt visibility could compromise investigations. .

Justification The ability to conduct surveillance without alerting subjects helps preserve the integrity of cases, increases the likelihood of obtaining actionable evidence, and promotes safer outcomes for both deputies and the public.

In addition to its surveillance advantages, the vehicle will improve overall investigative efficiency and responsiveness. Detectives will be able to move between locations quickly and inconspicuously, enhancing coordination with other units, supporting mobile surveillance, and responding effectively to evolving situations.

This resource will also support a broad range of investigative efforts, including narcotics enforcement, burglary suppression, and other theft-related operations where anonymity is essential. By expanding the bureau’s capabilities while maintaining a low profile, the unmarked vehicle will serve as a force multiplier – strengthening case development and improving the likelihood of successful prosecutions.

The Sheriff’s Department is looking to acquire a 2022-2024 SUV or Van as a patrol support vehicle. The vehicle may be new or used. After conducting research and looking at vehicle availability, the Department is requesting up to $50,000.00 for the identification and purchase of a vehicle. If approved, the city will work with the Sheriff’s Department to identify and purchase a vehicle for this purpose. Once purchased, the Sheriff’s Department will initiate a bailment process wherein the city will enter into a bailment agreement with the Sheriff’s Department wherein the Sheriff’s Department will assume liability, maintenance, and operational responsibility regarding the vehicle for the term of the agreement.

For reference related to cost:

Cost – Price range (based on CA listings): $34,000 – $47,000+ depending on trim and mileage (e.g. 26k miles: $40,000 – $41,000; 30k miles: $38,000 – $45,000; 35k – 40k miles: $34,000 – $42,000
Fiscal Impact $40,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
None-County will cover the ongoing maintenance of the vehicle Adopted $40,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 156 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Unmanned Aerial System (UAS/Drone)
Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $16,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-7101
Background The Sheriff’s Department is committed to modern, forward-thinking policing that emphasizes efficiency, innovation, and the responsible use of technology.

As service demands evolve, the Department continues to identify tools that streamline operations and enhance overall effectiveness. In April 2026, the Sheriff’s Department announced revisions to its unmanned aerial systems (UAS), or drones, policy that will significantly enhance patrol operations in the city by expanding situational awareness and improving response efficiency. The city’s unique geography comprised of hillside neighborhoods, winding roads, and nearby wildland areas, can make rapid ground-based assessment challenging. A drone provides real-time aerial visibility, allowing deputies to quickly evaluate incidents such as traffic collisions, missing person searches, or suspicious activity without waiting for the more costly airship (helicopter) response. This capability not only reduces response times for aerial support, but also enables more informed decision-making, helping deputies allocate resources more effectively and safely.

This is the Sheriff’s Department third priority.

Justification Drones are a cost-effective resource that can reduce operational strain on personnel while enhancing public safety outcomes. For example, they can assist in perimeter searches, warrant services, crowd monitoring during community events, and documentation of crime or accident scenes. By integrating drone technology into patrol operations, the city can achieve greater coverage and capability without the substantial expense associated with manned aircraft, ultimately delivering a high return on investment while maintaining a strong commitment to community safety and fiscal responsibility.

The Sheriff’s Department is currently working to roll out UAS programs at patrol stations. Crescenta Valley Station has two pilots trained with their Part 107 license and is actively working on expanding training deputies who will become pilots assigned to the station and specifically those who serve the city.

This request is for the hardware appropriation to be budgeted and, if approved, realization of a UAS program would likely occur mid-budget year based on the Sheriff’s Department phased roll out and the standing up a of centralized UAS unit within the Department to ensure compliance with all required policies, laws, and regulations.

Fiscal Impact $16,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
None
Adopted $16,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 157

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Citywide Evacuation Plan – Consultant Services Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $150,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-6061
Background The City Council previously authorized the release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the development of a Citywide Evacuation Plan, consistent with Council direction and in alignment with State requirements and the City’s ongoing emergency preparedness efforts.

The RFP solicits proposals from qualified consultants to develop a comprehensive evacuation plan that evaluates the City’s roadway network, identifies constraints, and provides actionable strategies to improve evacuation efficiency and public safety under a variety of emergency scenarios.

This project was not previously budgeted; as such, funding should be considered as part of the current FY 2026–27 budget process. Identifying and appropriating funds at this stage will ensure the City can proceed with consultant selection, contract award, and project implementation without delay once the RFP process is complete.

Justification Development of a Citywide Evacuation Plan is a critical component of the City’s broader emergency preparedness and resilience strategy. The plan is also a requirement under State law. The plan will:
• Evaluate evacuation routes, constraints, and traffic flow under emergency conditions
• Analyze key factors such as the Interstate 210 corridor, local roadway limitations, and access points
• Consider evacuation scenarios during peak periods, including school hours and full General Plan buildout conditions
• Provide data-driven recommendations to improve evacuation planning, coordination, and response
This effort also builds upon findings from the Eaton Fire After-Action Report (AAR) and supports the City’s ongoing efforts to strengthen emergency planning, coordination, and community safety.

Establishing funding at this stage ensures that once proposals are received and evaluated, the City can move forward efficiently with consultant selection and contract execution.

Fiscal Impact $150,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
None
Adopted $180,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 158 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Battery-Powered Rescue Combi Tool for Paramedic Rescue Squad 19 Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $15,000
Account Number(s) 01-21-8231
Background The City of La Cañada Flintridge’s fire protection and emergency medical services are provided through the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD). As part of this partnership, the City periodically considers targeted equipment investments that enhance the operational capabilities of personnel assigned to serve the community.

Paramedic Rescue Squad 19 provides specialized rescue and emergency response services within the City, including vehicle extrication during traffic collisions and other incidents requiring technical rescue.

Justification LACoFD has identified the acquisition of a battery-powered rescue combi tool as a high-priority operational need for Squad 19.

A combi tool integrates the functions of a hydraulic spreader and cutter into a single unit, allowing firefighters to perform vehicle extrication more efficiently when rescuing trapped victims. The proposed Genesis E-Force battery-powered system represents a significant advancement over traditional hydraulic tools, which require external power units, hoses, and multiple personnel for deployment.

Key operational benefits include:
• Reduced deployment time: A single rescuer can immediately deploy the tool without staging additional equipment
• Improved life safety outcomes: Faster extrication improves response effectiveness in time-critical incidents
• Increased operational efficiency: Eliminates the need for separate hydraulic systems and additional crew support
• Enhanced mobility: Battery-powered design allows direct deployment to the patient in confined or difficult-to-access areas
The Genesis E-Force series meets NFPA 1936 standards, has been evaluated through the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s SAVER program, and is widely utilized by fire agencies nationwide as a leading extrication platform.

This equipment would directly enhance the rescue capabilities of Paramedic Squad 19, improving emergency response outcomes for the community.

Fiscal Impact $15,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
None
Adopted $15,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 159 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Continuation of Additional Crossing Guard at La Cañada Boulevard and Fernside Drive
Department Policy and Executive Management Department
Requested Amount $18,300 for the additional crossing guard only.

Account Number(s) 01-42-6061
Background Since 2007-08, the City has contracted with All City Management Services Inc. (ACMS) to provide crossing guard services near schools throughout the City to support pedestrian safety for students walking to and from school.

On January 20, 2026, the City Council approved an amendment to the City’s crossing guard services agreement with ACMS to add one additional crossing guard location at La Cañada Boulevard and Fernside Drive. The additional crossing guard was added following recommendations from the Joint Use Committee and the LCE Working Group, which identified the location as an area where a supervised crossing could improve pedestrian safety and traffic operations.

The FY 2025–26 approved amendment increased the crossing guard services budget by approximately $17,200 for the additional.

At the time of approval, the City Council requested that the item return during the FY 2026–27 budget hearings as a Council Consideration Item to evaluate the effectiveness of the additional crossing guard location and determine whether the service should continue on an ongoing basis.

Justification Purpose of the Additional Crossing Guard
The crossing guard location at La Cañada Boulevard and Fernside Drive was implemented to support:
• Student pedestrian safety during school arrival and dismissal periods;
• Improved traffic flow and driver awareness near the school area; and
• Safer crossing operations at an intersection identified through prior traffic and operational discussions.

The crossing guard continues to operate during active school periods in coordination with ACMS and the La Cañada Unified School District.

Operational Feedback
School District and School Feedback
Since implementation, City staff has coordinated with representatives from the La Cañada Unified School District and La Cañada Elementary School regarding operations at the crossing location.

Feedback received to date has generally been positive regarding the additional crossing guard location. La Cañada Elementary indicated that the additional crossing guard has been beneficial in improving student Adopted $18,300
City of La Cañada Flintridge 160 FY 2026-27 Budget

safety and traffic operations, noting that students are more likely to use the designated crossing when a crossing guard is present, reducing unsafe mid-block crossings and improving overall crossing compliance.

School representatives also observed that the crossing location experiences pedestrian usage levels comparable to other crossing guard locations throughout the City and that the additional adult presence has supported both pedestrian safety and traffic management during school arrival and dismissal periods.

District and school feedback also noted that the crossing guard location has contributed to improved organization and predictability for student crossings within an area that experiences significant vehicle and pedestrian activity during peak school traffic periods.

Resident and Neighborhood Feedback
The City has also received feedback from residents and parents in the surrounding neighborhood regarding the additional crossing guard location.

Feedback received to date generally indicates that the crossing guard has improved pedestrian safety at the intersection, particularly due to the roadway curvature on the southwest side, which can limit visibility for both pedestrians and motorists. Residents have noted that the crossing guard location is actively utilized by students and pedestrians and that the crossing guard presence has helped improve crossing operations.

Residents have also continued to identify broader traffic and circulation concerns in the surrounding La Cañada Elementary School area, including:
• Ongoing illegal turning movements and traffic violations; • Concerns regarding limited traffic enforcement;
• Vehicle circulation and queue management issues associated with school drop-off operations;
• Driver non-compliance with established traffic patterns; and • Visibility concerns caused by parking near red curbs and crosswalk areas.

Specific concerns were raised about motorists making illegal left turns from northbound Encinas Drive onto Fernside Drive, as well as speeding and unsafe driving near the intersection. Residents also expressed concerns about student drop-off activities on narrow residential streets, including Salisbury Road and Fairview Drive.

Overall, feedback received indicates that the crossing guard is viewed as a beneficial safety measure under current roadway and traffic conditions.

Some residents noted that if future roadway reconfiguration or traffic engineering improvements were implemented at the intersection, the long-term operational need for the crossing guard could potentially be reevaluated.

Operational Considerations
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 161

Crossing guard services throughout the City are provided through the City’s agreement with All City Management Services (ACMS), which is responsible for staffing, training, supervision, and operational management of crossing guard personnel.

The addition of the Fernside Drive and La Cañada Boulevard location increased the City’s total crossing guard locations from ten (10) to eleven (11) sites.

As part of the FY 2026–27 budget process, the City Council may consider:
• Continuing the crossing guard on a permanent basis;
• Continuing the crossing guard for an additional evaluation period; or
• Discontinuing the additional crossing guard service.

Fiscal Impact The preliminary FY 2026–27 budget, previously reviewed by the City Council, included funding to continue the additional crossing guard at La Cañada Boulevard and Fernside Drive.

During prior budget discussions, questions were raised regarding why the FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27 crossing guard costs appeared relatively similar despite the Fernside crossing guard being considered a “new” addition.

The primary reason is that staff intentionally presented the broader annualized cost estimate during the January 2026 request to ensure the City Council fully understood the long-term operational cost associated with adding the new crossing guard location, rather than presenting only a partial-year fiscal impact. As a result, much of the operational cost associated with the added crossing guard was already reflected in the FY 2025–26 amended contract amount, making the projected FY 2026–27 continuation cost appear relatively similar year over year rather than reflecting a new annual increase.
$18,300
Recurring Annual Cost $18,300
City of La Cañada Flintridge 162 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Housing Element Update Consultant Services Department Community Development - Planning
Requested Amount $250,000
Account Number(s) 01-25-6065 (Professional Services)
Background State law mandates the General Plan Housing Element must be revised and updated every eight years. The 6th Housing Element Cycle runs from October 15, 2021- Ocotber 15, 2029. The 7th Cycle will run from October 15, 2029 through October 15, 2037. Given the 6th Cycle took approximately 2.5 two years to complete and undertake the necessary implementation action, 2.5 years prior to the next deadline is April 2027.

A Request for Proposals (RFP) will be prepared to advertise the request for these consultant services. The selected consultant will work with City staff to confirm a proposed detailed schedule with tasks and milestones for achieving Housing Element certification by the state-required deadline.

Justification The selected consultant will be tasked with:
• Reviewing and evaluating the City’s progress in implementing the 2021-2029 Housing Element.
• Community outreach during preparation of the Draft Housing Element. • Preparation of housing assessment, needs analysis, assessment of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements, consistent with State Housing Element Law.
• Identification of appropriate parcels to be included within the Sites Inventory demonstrating compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation. • Developing timeframes for implementation of specific objectives contained in the updated 2029-2037 7th Cycle Housing Element.
• Participation in public hearings.
• Presentation of the Draft Housing Element to the Planning Commission for recommendation to the City Council for their review and adoption. • Submittal of the approved Housing Element to California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for state certification. • Participation in environmental review and preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) related notices.
• Identifying amendments to the City’s Zoning Code necessary for implementation.

It is essential for the City to comply with all state requirements related to Housing Element preparation and approval in order to avoid penalties. Also, when applying for state grants, having a compliant Housing Element better positions a local jurisdiction to receive funding. Finally, a compliant Housing Element also reduces exposure to certain implications that can occur when a “Builder’s Remedy” project is submitted for city review and approval.

Fiscal Impact $250,000 total under multiyear contract
Recurring Annual
Cost
None
Adopted $100,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 163 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Body Cameras and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Department Community Development - Planning & Code Enforcement Divisions Requested Amount $3,500.00
Account Number(s) 01-25-6030 (Planning – Materials and Supplies) 01-27-6030 (Code Enforcement – Materials and Supplies)
Background There are a number of situations where employees are required to work within areas that have the potential for safety issues or during situations where clear identification of City employees is necessary. This includes staff inspecting active construction sites and inspections within the public right-of-way. Reviewing improvements that could be implemented after the Eaton Fire, resultant evacuations and damage from the wind event, it was noted that providing City staff with Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) would be beneficial to ensure employee safety and limited City liability. The anticipated enforcement of the anti-encampment ordinance would also benefit from the use of body cameras to prevent or address any legal challenges as to the actions of the City.

Furnishing Community Development Department staff with PPE when working in such situations is advisable. PPE can be utilized both during an emergency situation and/or during daily inspection work that takes place out in the field or when a potential difficult situation arises in the field that could necessitate the use of a body camera.

Justification PPE, which would include hard hats, high visibility safety vests, eye protection, gloves can be utilized both during an emergency situation and/or during daily inspection work. Though it will likely be utilized by Code Enforcement Officer staff during difficult field inspections, body cameras can also be useful for other department staff when they do their field work which can occur in the public right-of-way or in an area where a reflective vest, for instance, would make them better visible and better projected. Given that emergency situations have to be anticipated, having an available supply of PPE, including hard hats, safety vests, safety glasses, and gloves, can assist in keeping employees safe.

Fiscal Impact $3,500.00
Recurring Annual Cost $250.00
Adopted $3,500
City of La Cañada Flintridge 164 FY 2026-27 Budget

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Citywide Street Resurfacing
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $2,800,000
Source of Funding SB1 ($576,350), Measure M ($550,000), Measure R ($90,000), General Fund ($1,583,650) Account Number(s) 31-2x01
Background The Public Works Department annually assembles a list of proposed street segments for the next resurfacing project as part of the recurring Capital Improvement Program. The first criteria in the selection process is a review of the latest Pavement Condition Report prepared by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. The basis for the selection of streets is the Pavement Condition Index (PCI). A street with a PCI below 58 is rated as poor; below 40 is rated as failed. Streets within those two categories are ranked in numerical order from lowest to highest.

From the recommended streets, four additional factors are then considered to further prioritize the list: (1) condition of the concrete curb, gutter, cross gutters, and sidewalk; (2) need for additional sidewalk; (3) need for drainage improvements; and (4) groupings of streets to allow formaximum efficiency and more competitive pricing. The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1) is an eligible source of funding for this project as long as the City meets its Maintenance of Effort (MOE) funding.

For FY 2026-27, Public Works is recommending the following 3.53 centerline miles of streets at an estimated cost of $2,800,000 for the design and construction of the Project. The overall PCI for these streets is 60, just above the rating of poor.

Proposed Streets
• Starlight Crest Drive (from Burning Tree Dr. to Gleneagle Place) • Gleneagle Place (from Starlight Crest Dr. to Cul-De-Sac) • Tondolea Lane (from Palm Drive to Lone Pine Lane)
• Solliden Lane (from Jesson Drive to Cul-De-Sac)
• Sunnybank Drive (from Castle Road to Cul-De-Sac)
• Patagonia Drive (from Castle Road to Cul-De-Sac)
• Littleton Place (from Foothill Blvd. to Cul-De-Sac)
• Lyans Drive (from Rosebank Drive to Palm Drive)
• Ocean View Blvd. (from Foothill Blvd. to Cross Street) • Earlmont Avenue (from Fairmount Ave. to Alta Canyada Rd.) • Cross Street (from Ocean View Blvd. to Castle Road)
• Rosebank Drive (from Lyans Dr. to Cross Street)
• Georgian Road (from Commonwealth Ave. to Woodleigh Lane) • Conle Way (from Ocean View Blvd. to Cul-De-Sac)
• Leir Drive (from Conle Way to Cul-De-Sac)
• Saranne Street (from Ocean View Blvd. to Cul-De-Sac)
• Matley Road (from Cross Street to Cul-De-Sac)
• Castle Lane (from Foothill Blvd. to Castle Road)
• Via Venado Street (from Castle Road to Cul-De-Sac)
Justification To maintain City streets for all users–pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists Fiscal Impact $2,800,000
Recurring Annual Cost Reduced annual maintenance cost of the streets included in the project Eligible Sources of
Funding
SB1, Measure M, Measure R, General Fund
Adopted $2,410,000
GF $1,043,650 / SB1 $576,350
MM $550,000 MR $240,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge
165 FY 2026-27 Budget

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $200,000
Source of Funding TDA ($16,960); General Fund ($183,040) Account Number(s) 31-2x02
Background As part of the City’s annual maintenance program, the City repairs damaged or broken concrete sidewalks and installs or repairs damaged ADA curb ramps throughout the City.

Each year, the Public Works Department receives numerous public requests for the repair of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and cross gutters. From the assembled list, priority is given to ADA compliance.

Public Works is requesting $200,000 in FY 2025-26 for design and construction of the proposed project.

Justification Concrete repairs improve the drainage flow and pedestrian accessibility.

Fiscal Impact $200,000
Recurring Annual Cost Reduced annual maintenance costs for those areas that are improved.

Eligible Sources of
Funding
Transportation Development Act (TDA), General Fund
Adopted $166,960
GF $150,000 / TDA $16,960
City of La Cañada Flintridge 166 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Miscellaneous Bridge Repair
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $50,000
Source of Funding General Fund
Account Number(s) 31-27xx
Background There are a total of seven (7) City bridges, not including the bridges over the State Route 210 Freeway. The City contracts with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to perform biannual inspection of all the City bridges. The inspection reports provide the evaluation and assessment of the condition of each bridge and makes recommendations as to the maintenance and repair. This project allows for the recommended repairs identified in the inspection reports.

The most recent bridge inspection report identified that the northeast section of the railing of Oak Grove Bridge over Flint Canyon Wash needs to be repaired.

Justification Preventative maintenance will maintain the bridges in a state of good repair.

Fiscal Impact $50,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
Routine maintenance
Eligible Sources of
Funding
General Fund
Adopted $50,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 167 FY 2026-27 Budget

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $75,000
Source of Funding General Fund
Account Number(s) 31-2x04
Background There has been an increase in the number of pavement depressions forming throughout the City due to loose compacted soil mainly along the existing sewer lines.

Public Works is requesting $75,000 in FY 2026-27 to perform necessary repairs to City streets due to settlements that occur during the year.

Justification Repairs to pavement depressions to enhance safety for all users of City streets – pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists.

Fiscal Impact $75,000
Recurring Annual Cost Reduced annual maintenance costs for those areas that are improved.

Eligible Sources of Funding General Fund
Adopted $75,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 168

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title 2026-27 Miscellaneous Storm Drain Repairs Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $125,000
Source of Funding General Fund
Account Number(s) 31-2x03
Background The City owns and maintains an extensive local drainage system. During the year, Public Works receives complaints from residents about flooding caused by blocked or broken drains and surface runoff. The City also independently inspects and evaluates drainage facilities for potential improvements.

Public Works is requesting $125,000 in FY 2026-27 for design and construction of the following proposed drainage repairs:
1- Padres Trail and Forest Hill Drive Intersection - Ongoing surface drainage runoff is causing significant erosion to the roadway impacting the pavement of the roadway. It is proposed to replace the asphalt pavement with concrete pavement and other modifications to direct the surface runoff to the existing County Channel. 2- It is proposed to enlarge the existing catch basin at the N/W corner of Knight Way and Gould Avenue to increase the its intake capacity to accommodate the significant volume of water that runs across the intersection.

The total estimated project cost is $200,000, however, unspent funds in the Miscellaneous Storm Drain Repair projects from FY 2024-25 ($35,000) and FY 2025-26 ($40,000) may be reallocated to this project, reducing the funding request to $125,000.

Justification To eliminate surface water runoof across the roadway and capture it into drainage facilities and thus preventing flooding.

Fiscal Impact $125,000
Recurring Annual Cost Reduced annual maintenance costs
Eligible Sources of Funding General Fund
Adopted $100,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 169 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Foothill Resurfacing & ADA Enhancement Concept Plan Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $500,000
Source of Funding Prop C ($100,000), Measure M ($100,000), General Fund ($300,000) Account Number(s) 31-27xx
Background Foothill Boulevard is a major corridor traversing the City in east -west direction from Oak Grove Drive to Briggs Ave. Through the past years, the City has implemented many improvements projects along Foothill Blvd related to median and road improvements, upgrade of traffic signals including curb ramps, striping and signage, bike lanes and pedestrians.

The pavement condition along Foothill Blvd is currently in fair to poor condition and requires rehabilitation soon. In addition, many curb ramps, driveways and sidewalks need to be upgraded to meet the latest ADA guidelines.

Staff is requesting $500,000 to hire a consultant to assess the condition of the pavement, curb ramps, driveways and sidewalks and provide appropriate recommendations, including cost estimates. The Consultant will also study the feasibility of including other amenities to make the corridor as a complete street.

Justification Improved traffic safety for all road users – vehicles, bikes, and pedestrians
Fiscal Impact $500,000
Recurring Annual Cost N/A
Eligible Sources of Funding Prop C, Measure M, General Fund Adopted $300,000
MM $100,000 MR $100,000
PC $100,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 170

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Soundwall Phase V
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $75,000
Source of Funding Measure M
Account Number(s) 31-2606
Background In FY 2025-26, the City Council funded $250,000 of staff’s $500,000 request for the development of Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) for I-210 Freeway Soundwall Improvements Project, Phase V, which consists of one wall segment (S322) located on the north side of the freeway between Commonwealth Ave and Angeles Crest Highway. The scope includes a revised concept plan and updates various technical studies to support the preparation of an updated Project Report.

During the year, staff obtained a fee proposal in the amount of $309,053 from Ardurra Group, Inc., one of the On-Call Civil Engineering consultants, for the preparation of PA&ED for the Project. The City Council approved the cost proposal on February 3, 2026, and included $15,947 for contingencies for a total fee of $325,000.

Staff is requesting an additional $75,000 to fund the remaining amount of the Task Order.

Justification To complete the preparation of the PA&ED for the Project.

Fiscal Impact $75,000
Recurring Annual Cost None
Eligible Sources of Funding Measure M
Adopted $75,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 171 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Hillard (Foothill to Fairmount)
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $250,000
Source of Funding Measure R
Account Number(s) 31-2208
Background In FY 2024-25, in response to additional complaints on Hillard related to excessive speeding, City Council approved $100,000 to hire a consultant for the development of a concept plan and to solicit community input on the proposed improvements.

Staff held a town hall in April 2025, and the community feedback was to request additional design concepts.

The project has $78,790 in unspent funds. An additional $250,000 is requested for the continued development of concepts and Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E).

Justification Improved traffic safety for all road users – vehicles, bikes, and pedestrians
Fiscal Impact $250,000
Recurring Annual Cost None
Eligible Sources of Funding Measure R
Adopted $100,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 172 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Inverness Storm Drain & Resurfacing
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $150,000
Source of Funding Measure R
Account Number(s) 31-2609
Background In FY 2025-26, the City Council funded $75,000 to design a drainage system to channelize the surface runoff and mudflows over the road generated from the hillside runoff in the vicinity of 312 Inverness Drive to an existing facility at Corona Dr.

During the year, staff obtained a fee proposal from a consultant form the On-Call Civil Engineering List for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, & Engineering (PS&E) but it was too high and we are in the process of soliciting another fee proposal.

Staff is asking for an additional $150,000 to complete the PS&E and advertise the project for construction bids in FY 2026-27.

Justification Additional funding to finance the design cost of the Project.

Fiscal Impact $150,000
Recurring Annual Cost Reduced annual maintenance of the streets included in the project Eligible Sources of Funding Measure R
Adopted $100,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 173 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Green Alley II
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $105,000
Source of Funding Measure W
Account Number(s) 18-2601
Background In FY 2025-26, the City Council funded $100,000 for the design phase for Green Alley II, located from Valley Sun Lane/Hill Street to Angeles Crest Highway.It is proposed to install porous pavers pavement, instead of conventional asphalt pavement, to capture rainwater and allow it to infiltrate back into the ground, which provides stormwater quality and MS4 Permit compliance benefits.

During the year, staff obtained a fee proposal in the amount of $48,800 from Aufbau, Inc., one of the On-Call Civil Engineering consultants, for the preparation of a feasibility study to determine the feasibility of installing porous pavers. Based on the study, it was determined that the site is feasible and we can proceed with the preparation of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for the Project.

Current project cost estimate:

Staff is requesting an
additional amount of
$105,000 increasing the
project funding to
$160,000 to complete the PS&E for the project. It is expected that design will be completed in Spring 2027, after which the project will be advertised for construction bids. The construction costs are estimated to range between $750,000 and $900,000 and funding will be requested in FY 2027-28 Budget.

Design
Original Funding $100,000
Estimated Cost to Date ($45,000)
Balance $55,000
Justification To complete the preparation of PS&E.

Fiscal Impact $105,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
$TBD
Eligible Sources of
Funding
Measure W
Adopted $105,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 174 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Citywide Bulk Street Repaving Strategy and Accelerated Pavement Program Department Public Works
Requested Amount $150,000
Account Number(s) 01-42-6061
Background The current budget includes a standard annual resurfacing request for 2025-26 Citywide Street Resurfacing in the amount of $2.5 million, covering 2.6 centerline miles of streets selected using Pavement Condition Index data and other prioritization factors, including grouping projects for efficiency and more competitive pricing.

That annual resurfacing model is logical as an ongoing maintenance practice, but it also means the City is addressing street deterioration incrementally, a few miles at a time, over many years. This request would direct staff to step back and evaluate whether a much larger one-time or limited-phase paving strategy would make more financial and operational sense.

Specifically, staff would be asked to return with an analysis of scenarios for resurfacing or rehabilitating approximately 50%, 75%, and up to 100% of the City’s paved street network over a compressed time period rather than continuing with the current pace of roughly one annual paving package at a time. It may even include discussions and estimates with vendors.

The requested study/plan should evaluate:
● the approximate cost of each large-scale paving scenario, ● whether larger bundled construction would reduce unit costs through economies of scale,
● how such a program would affect the City’s overall pavement condition baseline,
● financing options, including cash, reserves, grants, and/or debt, ● project phasing options,
● operational impacts on neighborhoods and traffic,
● which streets should be grouped first, and
● whether the long-term maintenance burden would be reduced by resetting a larger share of the network at once.

Justification The annual paving program is useful, but it may not be the most efficient longterm strategy if the City is perpetually trying to catch up. A larger bulk paving approach could potentially:
● lower mobilization and procurement costs per mile,
● improve contractor pricing through larger bundled work, ● reduce deferred maintenance exposure,
● improve resident satisfaction more quickly, and
● reset the City’s pavement network to a healthier baseline in a shorter timeframe.

Adopted $100,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 175 FY 2026-27 Budget

Before continuing indefinitely with a slower annual model, the Council should understand whether a more ambitious catch-up strategy would actually save money over time and deliver better results.

Importantly, this request is not yet asking Council to approve a massive paving contract. It is asking for the work needed to give Council real options: what 50%, 75%, or 100% accelerated paving would cost, how it could be phased, how it could be funded, and whether it would outperform the current incremental approach.

Fiscal Impact $150,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
None
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 176

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Angeles Crest Hwy at Green Lane Traffic Signal Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $550,000
Source of Funding General Fund
Account Number(s) 31-2605
Background The City Council approved staff’s FY 2025-26 funding request for $100,000 to fund the design phase for the installation of a traffic signal on Angeles Crest Highway at Green Lane.

In FY 2025-26, staff solicited a consultant to conduct a Traffic Signal Warrant Study, as a first step for the installation of a traffic signal within Caltrans’ rightof-way. The study found that the traffic signal is warranted at the intersection, and the report was submitted to Caltrans for review and concurrence. Upon acceptance by Caltrans, staff will begin the development of Plans, Specifications, & Engineering (PS&E).

Staff informed the City Council with the original funding request that additional funding would be requested in FY 2026-27 to fund the construction phase for the project.

Current project schedule and cost estimates are:

Design Construction
Funded $100,000 $0
Estimated Cost to Date $7,600 $0
Remaining Funds $92,400 $0
Estimated Total Cost $100,000 $500,000*
Additional Funding Request $50,000 $500,000*
Estimated Completion Spring 2027 Summer 2028
*Rough estimate and will be adjusted in FY2027-28 Budget, if needed.

Justification Speed mitigation on Angeles Crest Highway Fiscal Impact $550,000
Recurring Annual Cost Annual traffic signal maintenance of $1,000 Eligible Sources of
Funding
General Fund
Adopted $250,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 177 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title No Parking During Red Flag Warning Program Department Public Works
Fund (Program) General Fund
Requested Amount $75,000
Source of Funding General Fund
Account Number(s) 01-42-8231
Background On October 21, 2025, the City Council received a presentation that outlined the draft Red Flag No Parking Program that was developed in coordination with the Los Angeles County Fire Department and traffic engineers. The proposed program would restrict parking on designated streets during a National Weather Serviceissued Red Flag Warning to allow emergency vehicle access while facilitating resident evacuation. Restrictions included:
• Major Collector streets: No parking on both sides, regardless of street width
• Streets under 30 feet wide: No parking on both sides
• Streets with a single point of access: No parking on one side (ingress or egress)
• Potential evacuation routes requiring two-way traffic: No parking on one side (ingress or egress)
The City Council directed staff to separate its discussion of the proposed Red Flag Program into two distinct options:
• Option 1 — Staff’s recommended Selected-Street Program, focusing on specific streets identified as critical for emergency access and evacuation. • Option 2 — The Public Safety Commission's Citywide Concept, which would apply restrictions on all public streets during Red Flag Warnings.

On November 18, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing, received public testimony, discussed the proposal, and adopted the “No Parking During Red Flag Warning Policy”.

Staff is requesting $75,000 in FY 2026-27 to install approximately 105 “No Parking” signs, as shown in the attached sheets, at the intersection of each streets that were designated based on the above criteria. This will minimize the pollution of signs along these designated streets. Upon installation, staff will evaluate the effectiveness of these signs and determine if additional signs will be required Justification Implementation of the No Parking During Red Flag Warning Policy Fiscal Impact $75,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
$2,000 for replacement of damaged signs
Eligible Sources of
Funding
Adopted $75,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 178 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Pet Waste Stations
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) General Fund (Landscape, Trails, and Rights-of-Way) Requested Amount $6,500
Source of Funding General Fund
Account Number(s) 01-45-8231
Background The City currently has twenty (20) pet waste collection stations located at trailheads and parksthroughout the City which are serviced by the City’s landscaping contractor. Due to an increase in complaints related to pet waste left on trails, in parks, and at trailheads, this request is to add ten (10) pet waste collection stations at the following locations:

1. North Side of Memorial Park

2. South Side of Memorial Park

3. Mayors Discovery Park

4. South side of Olive Lane at Open Space Trail crossing

5. South Side of El Vago Street at Open Space Trail crossing

6. Indiana Ave at LC open Space Trail trailhead (north of Foothill Blvd)

7. Sugar Loaf Drive at Cherry Canyon Fire Road trailhead

8. Canon de Paraiso at Gould Canyon Trail trailhead

9. East side of Crown Ave at Gould Canyon Trail crossing

10. East side of Woodleigh Lane at Flint Canyon Trail crossing Justification In addition to being unsightly and creating an unpleasant recreational environment, pet waste may have harmful bacteria that can wash into storm drains and flow directly into streams during runoff events. Pet waste stations provide waste bags and receptacles for recreational users with pets to properly dispose of pet waste.

Fiscal Impact $6,500
Recurring Annual Cost $3,500 annual maintenance for supplies and services Eligible Sources of Funding General Fund
Adopted $6,500
City of La Cañada Flintridge FY 2026-27 Budget 179

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Pedestrian Crossing – Foothill Blvd at Indiana Ave (HSIP Cycle 12) Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Capital Projects Fund
Requested Amount $300,000
Source of Funding Prop C ($300,000)
Account Number(s) 31-2608
Background The City was successful in securing $350,000 of HSIP funds under Cycle 12 of the grant program to upgrade the existing overhead flashing beacon signal on Foothill Blvd at Indiana Ave to a High-Intensity Activated CrossWalk (HAWK). The existing overhead flashing beacon signal is uncontrolled, and an upgrade to a HAWK system will increase pedestrian safety. In addition, $40,000 in General Funds was included in FY 2025-26 Budget totaling $390,000 toward the design and construction costs of the project.

During FY 2025-26, a Task Order in the amount of $57,485 was awarded to an On-Call Civil Engineering Consultant for the design phase of the project, leaving a balance of $345,000. Design is expected to be completed by June 30, 2026.

Based on current 65% design plans, construction costs are estimated to be $645,000. We request an additional $300,000 to be included in FY 2026-27 Budget to finance the construction phase of the project.

Justification Upgrade the existing outdated traffic signal equipment for improved pedestrian safety
Fiscal Impact $300,000
Recurring Annual Cost Annual traffic signal maintenance of $1,000 Eligible Sources of Funding Prop C
Adopted $300,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 180 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title City Vehicle
Department Public Works
Fund (Program) Air Quality Management District
Requested Amount $85,000
Source of Funding AQMD Trust
Account Number(s) 37-00-8231
Background The City currently has four (4) vehicles in its fleet, of which the oldest is a 2011 Chevy Silverado hybrid used by Public Works.

In January 2025, the City purchased a fully electric Chevy Silverado with AQMD funds. The 2025 purchase was intended to replace the 2011 truck, however, with the addition of a Public Works Maintenance Assistant position in December 2025, the 2011 Chevy Silverado was put back into service.

Justification The City’s 2011 Chevy Silverado hybrid truck has 73,000 miles and is nearing the end of its useful life. The replacement of the vehicle with a fully electric truck is consistent with the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and will result in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Fiscal Impact $85,000
Recurring Annual Cost $1,500 annual maintenance after warranty expiration Eligible Sources of Funding AQMD
Adopted $85,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 181 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title ADA Compliance – PDF Remediation for Archived City Council Agendas, Minutes, and Staff Reports
Department Administration
Requested Amount $200,000
Account Number(s) 01-04-6061
Background The City Clerk’s Office maintains an archive of City Council agendas, agenda reports, and minutes that are currently available in PDF format. While accessible for general use, these documents do not meet current ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility standards. As a result, individuals using screen readers or other assistive technologies may not be able to fully access the content.

Recent laws and best practices for public agencies emphasize the importance of ensuring digital records, including historical documents, are fully ADA compliant.

By April 24, 2026, cities with a population of 50,000 or more must ensure that web content and mobile applications comply with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA, an international standard for web content accessibility. Cities with populations less than 50,000 must comply by April 26, 2027.

Staff has identified three possible options:
(1) $50,000: Remove all non-compliant documents from the City’s website and approve funds to begin remediation of the City’s most recent documents. This includes funds to comply with accessibilityrelated public records requests. (2) $300,000: Remediate the last three years of agendas, minutes, and staff reports as funding allows. Remove all non-compliant documents from the City’s website.
(3) $1,200,000: Immediately remediate all public facing non-compliant documents.

Justification Engaging a professional PDF remediation service will ensure that archived agenda materials and minutes are accurately converted into ADA-compliant formats. These services provide manual tagging, document structuring, and quality assurance that automated tools cannot reliably achieve.

This effort will:
-Ensure compliance with ADA standards
-Reduce legal risk and potential complaints
-Improve transparency and equitable access to public records -Align with the City’s commitment to inclusivity and accessibility Adopted $15,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 182 FY 2026-27 Budget

Fiscal Impact $200,000
- The cost to remediate original (born-digital) PDFs ranges from $5 to $8 per page.
- The cost to remediate scanned PDFs ranges from $8 to $13 per page.

For a typical agenda packet, which includes two separate agendas (one for a special meeting and one for a regular meeting), along with agenda reports and minutes, the estimated one-time cost is $3,000 - $5,000 per meeting.

The final cost for each agenda packet will depend on the total number of pages and the type of PDFs contained within the packet. The City Council may choose to only initially remedy agendas and minutes to reduce the number of pages and cost.

Recurring Annual Cost If necessary, these costs may be spread over multiple fiscal years. Should this be completed in phases, the City Council can consider a dedicated amount of funds each fiscal year until the remediation is completed.

Ongoing compliance for new documents can be integrated into existing workflows or managed through separate tools and processes.

City of La Cañada Flintridge 183 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Playground Equipment at Memorial Park
Department Administration / Public Works / Joint Operations Team Requested Amount $1,000,000
Account Number(s) 01-31-8231
Background Memorial Park is the City's most used park. Community members reserve the picnic area and the gazebo area for private parties, and several community events take place at the park, including the City's Summer Music in the Park concert series. The park includes the largest playground of the City’s parks spanning various ages.

Justification The Memorial Park playground structure is used daily. During major events, the playground offers an area for kids to be active with parents close by to watch over them but still be part of the event taking place at the park.

The City installed the current play equipment over 26 years ago according to the historical data available. Based on manufacturing guidelines, playgrounds are recommended to be redone every 20 years. Over the last seven years, the City has noticed an increasing number of failures with parts and equipment requiring increasing maintenance needs. The tire swing was recently removed from the playground when it was deemed beyond repair and could not be replaced with a similar product due to ADA-accessibility issues.

As the equipment is reaching its end of its useful life, the City should consider replacing the equipment. The City previously reached out to a vendor to discuss possible revitalizing the playground equipment options. The City has two possible options:

Option 1 Play Equipment Replacement: approximately $800,000 This option would include replacing the old play equipment with newer, more ADA-friendly, play-friendly equipment. With this option, the new equipment would be confined to the existing area and limit the flexibility and options that are available and limit the play area. The layout and feel of the playground would remain the same.

Option 2 (Play Equipment Replacement and Resurfacing): approximately $1,000,000
This option is the redesign and rebuild of the playground and to build an entirely new playground footprint, as well as resurfacing the entire play area. This option would redesign the playground from scratch, optimize the space, and introduce new features unavailable 26 years ago and resurface the play area that would make the site accessible under ADA guidelines.

Fiscal Impact $1,000,000
Recurring Annual
Cost
None
Adopted $800,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 184 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title Lanterman Auditorium Stage Floor Repair
Department Administration
Requested Amount $17,250
Account Number(s) 01-50-7103
Background The Lanterman Auditorium is an 812 seat full-service auditorium available for public use that is property of the La Cañada Unified School District (LCUSD) but is operated by City of La Cañada Flintridge (City) through a Joint Use Agreement. Under the Joint Use Agreement, any maintenance or capital improvement costs exceeding $5,000 must be submitted to the Joint Use Committee, now known as the Joint Operations Team, for consideration and funding from the City and LCUSD. Due to the natural wear and tear of the stage, it is time to make major repairs to the auditorium's stage.

Justification The Lanterman Auditorium serves as a community venue for many community groups, including local schools' performances and graduations. In 2025, the Auditorium was reserved 161 days of the year from 56 separate reservations. The Auditorium maintains much of its original charm and décor with minor modifications and improvements, including painting walls, sanding and refinishing the stage hardwood floors, and replacing lights and equipment. The current stage is the original hardwood floors that were installed in the 1960s.

In November 2025, one of the auditorium reservation holders shared their concern with the condition of the hardwood floors on the stage. A student performer gently fell to the floor during a rehearsal, which caused an injury that warranted a trip to the emergency room to remove a 1-inch splinter. Due to this incident, staff are actively discouraging user groups from any sliding movements on the floor to prevent further injury until the stage safety issue has been addressed.

To remedy this issue, City staff reached out to six local hardwood floor vendors for preliminary estimates and met with four of them at Lanterman Auditorium to see what remediation options are available, including the possibility of replacing the entire stage with new hardwood floor. Staff then issued a Request for Proposals in PlanetBids and received 4 responses, ranging in price from $34,5000 to $49,000.

At the May 28, 2026 Joint Operations Team Meeting, LCUSD indicated that they were willing to contribute half of the lowest bidder’s estimate, or $17,250, to repair the floor.

Fiscal Impact $17,250
Recurring Annual Cost N/A
Adopted $17,250
City of La Cañada Flintridge 185 FY 2026-27 Budget

City of La Cañada Flintridge

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
FY 2026-27 BUDGET REVIEW
Request Title LCHS Pickleball Project
Department Administration
Requested Amount $40,000
Account Number(s) 01-32-8231
Background During the December 10, 2025, Joint Operations Team meeting, the La Canada Unified School District (LCUSD) proposed the potential to start a pilot pickleball program at the La Canada High School (LCHS) joint use facility, should the City be interested. Based on the proposal, the Joint Operations Team recommended the conversion of two of the six tennis courts to dual-sport tennis/pickleball courts on LCHS property as a pilot program.

Justification Before the pickleball pilot program can be implemented at LCHS, a noise study must be conducted to determine how the addition of these pickleball courts will impact the surrounding areas. Pickleball is frequently associated with a high-pitched, sharp “pop” from the paddle hitting the ball at a high frequency due to the quick nature of the game.

While adjacent freeway may minimize the noise impacts to the residential neighborhoods nearby, this cannot be determined without a noise study.

Staff issued a Request for Proposals for a noise study via PlanetBids and received 11 responses ranging in price from $12,400 to $69,500. If the City Council decides to move forward, the recommended vendor bid $18,600, and with a 10% contingency could potentially cost up to $20,443.

The results from the noise study can result in several outcomes. Firstly, if the impacts can be avoided or mitigated to less-than-significant levels, the City can pursue a Negative Declaration (ND) or Mitigated ND under CEQA. The MND/ND would identify any noise mitigation that may be necessary, and the Joint Operations Team can move forward with converting the two of the tennis courts to dual pickleball/tennis courts.

Alternatively, if the findings show significant impact, it may require a more extensive and costly Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR would identify alternatives and propose mitigation measures.

As reported at the February 17, 2026 City Council Meeting, the cost to prepare and stripe the courts and to purchase nets will cost approximately $14,000. Annual maintenance is projected to be $6,000.

Fiscal Impact Total Project Cost for Year 1 Including Noise Study: $40,000 Recurring Annual Cost $6,000
Adopted $20,000
City of La Cañada Flintridge 186 FY 2026-27 Budget

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Budget City of La Cañada Flintridge Section Seven: Appendix

Kim Bowman, Mayor
ATTEST:

Tania Garcia, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) ss.

City of La Cañada Flintridge )
I, Tania Garcia, City Clerk of the City of La Canada Flintridge, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26 - __ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of La Canada Flintridge at a Regular Meeting held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Tania Garcia, City Clerk
Dated: June 3, 2025
Resolution No. 26 - ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE ADOPTING THE APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 AT $30,477,789
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026.

WHEREAS, on November 7, 1979, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 4, the addition of Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various limitations on the appropriations of state and local governments; and, WHEREAS, Article XIII B provided for establishing fiscal year 1978-79 and the adopted spending appropriation for that year as the base for calculating future years' appropriations limits; and,
WHEREAS, Article XIII B provided for establishing each fiscal year's limit by adjusting the immediately prior year's limit by a factor comprised of the change in local population combined with either the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index, whichever is less; and,
WHEREAS, in June 1990, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 111 which amended Article XIII B of the California State Constitution to establish the limit originally calculated for fiscal year 1986-87 as a new adjustment base and to change the definition of the cost of living to be either the percentage change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year for the jurisdiction due to the addition of local non-residential new construction; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 111 further modified Article XIII B requirements by making certain capital outlay, debt service, emergency and court ordered expenditures not subject to the limit and by allowing expenditures in excess of one year's limit to be offset by underexpenditures in an immediately following year;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 111, formally elects to use county-wide population changes for Los Angeles County and California per capita income changes rather than U.S. Consumer Price Index changes in determining its Appropriations Limit for FY 2026-27. Be it further resolved that the City Council hereby adopts its Appropriations Limit for FY 2026-27 as $30,477,789.

City of La Cañada Flintridge 187 FY 2026-27 Budget

Exhibit A

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TABLE
Change in Expenditures Revenues
Appropriations Per Capita Change in to Limit to Limit
Year Limit Pers. Income Population Multiplier Margin Margin 1992-93 7,144,032 1.0272 1.0096 1.0371 813,282 3,748,382 1993-94 7,409,076 1.0071 1.0075 1.0147 433,801 3,880,476 1994-95 7,517,989 1.0472 1.0033 1.0506 793,739 3,824,339 1995-96 7,898,399 1.0467 1.0048 1.0517 925,924 4,020,199 1996-97 8,306,746 1.0467 1.0124 1.0597 841,246 4,266,346 1997-98 8,802,659 1.0415 1.0139 1.0559 (370,641) 4,510,684 1998-99 9,294,728 1.0453 1.0166 1.0626 (1,819,747) 4,526,428 1999-00 9,876,578 1.0491 1.0175 1.0675 (3,127,722) 4,951,303 2000-01 10,543,247 1.0782 1.0166 1.0960 (167,853) 5,255,897 2001-02 11,555,399 0.9873 1.0177 1.0047 7,202,049 6,170,299 2002-03 11,609,709 1.0231 1.0166 1.0400 (3,651,241) 6,016,659 2003-04 12,074,097 1.0328 1.0138 1.0470 (15,138,295) 6,724,030 2004-05 12,641,580 1.0684 1.0118 1.0810 (24,207,952) 7,297,148 2005-06 13,463,283 1.0396 1.0078 1.0477 (22,636,893) 7,183,182 2006-07 14,105,482 1.0442 1.0072 1.0517 (21,760,090) 6,988,310 2007-08 14,834,735 1.0429 1.0086 1.0518 (15,081,226) 7,294,949 2008-09 15,603,174 1.0062 1.0090 1.0153 (6,428,397) 8,066,653 2009-10 15,841,903 0.9746 1.0058 0.9803 (5,742,608) 7,130,067 2010-11 15,529,817 1.0251 1.0020 1.0272 (6,884,447) 7,613,928 2011-12 15,952,228 1.0377 1.0038 1.0416 (4,411,109) 7,895,466 2012-13 16,615,841 1.0512 1.0069 1.0585 (5,403,057) 8,663,343 2013-14 17,587,868 0.9977 1.0078 1.0055 (4,699,574) 8,380,126 2014-15 17,684,601 1.0382 1.0082 1.0467 (3,965,353) 8,701,672 2015-16 18,510,472 1.0537 1.0085 1.0627 (4,220,371) 9,240,679 2016-17 19,671,079 1.0369 0.9996 1.0365 (3,502,377) 9,958,673 2017-18 20,389,073 1.0367 1.0022 1.0390 (7,848,078) 10,189,722 2018-19 21,184,247 1.0385 0.9990 1.0375 (8,014,469) 10,323,326 2019-20 21,978,656 1.0373 0.9989 1.0362 (9,447,592) 10,323,326 2020-21 22,774,283 1.0573 0.9922 1.0491 (18,568,444) 11,552,256 2021-22 23,891,431 1.0755 0.9929 1.0679 (23,338,652) 12,160,548 2022-23 25,512,798 1.0444 0.9935 1.0376 (27,390,646) 11,873,629 2023-24 26,472,079 1.0362 0.9980 1.0341 (14,714,153) 10,286,307 2024-25 27,374,777 1.0644 1.0005 1.0649 (13,424,920) 9,302,720 2025-26 29,151,400 1.0495 0.9962 1.0455 (14,148,531) 9,857,379 2026-27 30,477,789
Formula: Old Appropriation Limit x Multiplier (i.e. Change in Per Capita Personal Income x Change in Population) To determine "Change in Population", use L.A. County Rate + 100 divided by 100 City of La Cañada Flintridge 188 FY 2026-27 Budget

Exhibit B
REVENUES/EXPENDITURES TO APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT MARGIN FY 2026-27 Franchise Fees 849,560
Sales Tax 3,693,600 Municipal Code Fines 142,790
Transaction and Use Tax 3,744,900 Tree Ordinance 22,210 Real Property Transfer Tax 320,960 Parking Fines 20,860 Property Tax 7,965,740 Administrative Penalties 24,150
Property Tax (In-Lieu) 3,784,540 Film Permit Fees 19,280 Business License Fees 233,470 Zoning Fees 225,000
Vehicle License Fees 30,440 Geological Review Fees 85,000 Off-Highway Vehicle 0 Engineering and Administrative Review Fees 21,350 Interest Earnings 846,760 Environmental Assessment 10,000 Total 20,620,410 Use of Fields/Charging Station Fees 25,400 Lanterman Auditorium 180,310
Service Charges/Tobacco Lic. Fee/DAE Fee 7,120
Computer Innovation & Tracking Fee 83,340
General Plan Maintenance Fee 43,170
Building Permit Fees 1,750,000
Solid Waste Hauler Permit Fees 776,260
Revenues to Appropriation Limit Margin: Plan Check Fees 1,200,000 Specific Plan/Decal/Placard 25,880
30,477,789 Public Works Permits Fees 106,650
- 20,620,410 Industrial Waste Permit Fees 17,570
9,857,379 Miscellaneous Revenue/Donations 39,100
Public Works and Lighting Reimbursements 24,230
FEMA Refund/State Beverage Recycling Grant 128,360
Expenditures to Appropriation Limit Margin: Cerro Negro/Parking Lot Lease 6,000 Rental Income 238,770
30,477,789 Traffic Safety (Vehicle Code Fines) 63,000
- 44,626,320 * Gas Tax & Proposition 42 and Interest 1,184,210 (14,148,531) Bonds & Grants Fund and Interest 0
TDA SB 821 and Interest 16,960
CDBG 57,820
Federal Emergency Funds 12,600
Measure W and Interest 400,650
Sewer Improvement Funds (All) 32,970
Sewer Redemption Funds (All) 0
Sewer Debt Service Funds (All) 124,100
* From FY budget (total expenditures) Sewer Maint. Fund (04-1) 388,970 Measure R and Interest 349,060
Proposition C and Interest 472,620
Proposition A and Interest 546,560
Capital Projects Revenue 686,060
Measure M and Interest 384,400
SLESF 210,640
Civic Center Debt Service Fund 13,170
AQMD AB 2766/Interest 29,630
Total 11,045,780
Proceeds of Taxes (Revenue Subject to Limit) Non-Proceeds of Taxes (Revenue Not Subject to Limit) City of La Cañada Flintridge 189 FY 2026-27 Budget

ALLOCATE: To divide a lump-sum appropriation, which is designated for expenditure, by specific organization units and/or specific purposes, activities, or objects.

ANNUAL BUDGET: A budget applicable to a single fiscal year.

APPROPRIATION: An authorization made by the City Council which permits the City to incur obligations and to make expenditures of resources.

AUDIT: Prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA), the primary objective of an audit is to determine if the City's financial statements present fairly the City's financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In conjunction with their performance of an audit, it is customary for an independent auditor to issue a Management Letter stating the adequacy of the City's internal controls, as well as recommending improvements to the City's financial management practices.

BUDGET: A financial plan for a specified period of time that matches planned revenues and expenditures for municipal services.

BUDGET CALENDAR: A schedule of key dates which the City follows in the preparation, adoption and administration of the annual budget.

BUDGET DETAIL: Support information and notes which describe in detail the purpose for specific budget line items and the allocation of funds.

BUDGET MESSAGE: Included in the opening section of the budget, the budget message provides the City Council and the public with a general summary of the most important aspects of the budget, changes from the previous fiscal years, and the views and recommendations of the City Manager.

CJPIA: California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
CONTINGENCY: An appropriation of funds to cover unforeseen events that occur during the fiscal year, such as disaster emergencies, federal and/or state mandates, shortfall in revenues, or other unanticipated events.

CONTRACT SERVICES: Services rendered to the City by private firms, individuals or other governmental agencies. Examples include law enforcement, legal services, animal control, traffic engineering, traffic signal maintenance, road maintenance, tree trimming, building inspection, recycling collection, custodial services, etc.

DEPARTMENT: A major organizational unit of the City which has been assigned overall management responsibility for an operation or a group of related operations within a functional area.

DESIGNATED FUND BALANCE: A portion of unreserved fund balance designated for a specific future use.

ENCUMBRANCE: The legal commitment of appropriated funds to purchase an item or service.

To encumber funds means to set aside or commit funds for a future expenditure.

GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS
City of La Cañada Flintridge 190 FY 2026-27 Budget

EXPENDITURE: The outflow of funds paid, or to be paid, for an asset obtained or goods and services acquired, regardless of when the expense is actually paid. This term applies to all funds. An encumbrance is not an expenditure; an encumbrance reserves funds to be expended.

FEE FOR SERVICES: Charges paid to the City by users of a service to help defray the costs of providing that service.

FISCAL YEAR: The beginning and ending period for recording financial transactions. The City has specified July 1 through June 30 as its fiscal year.

FIXED ASSETS: Assets of long-term nature, such as: land, buildings, machinery, furniture, or other equipment. The City has defined such assets as those with an expected life in excess of one year and an acquisition cost in excess of $5,000.

FRANCHISE FEE: A fee charged for the privilege of using public rights-of-way and property within the City for public or private purposes. The City currently assesses franchise fees on cable television and utility companies.

FUND: An accounting entity that records all financial transactions for specific activities or governmental functions. The generic fund types used by the City are:

General, Traffic Safety, State Gas Tax, Bonds & Grants, T.D.A., Gas Tax, Sanitation/Sewer, Debt Service, Measure W, Measure R, Measure M, Prop. C Prop. A, Property Acquisition, Capital Projects, SLESF, and AQMD Trust.

FUND BALANCE: The excess of current assets over current liabilities and the cumulative effect of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses.

GENERAL FUND: The primary operating fund of the City, all revenues that are not allocated by law or contractual agreement to a specific fund are accounted for in the General Fund. With the exception of subvention or grant revenues restricted for specific uses, General Fund resources can be utilized for any legitimate governmental purpose.

GOAL: A statement of broad direction, purpose or intent.

INFRASTRUCTURE: The physical assets of the City, i.e. streets, sidewalks, gutters, sewers, public buildings, bridges, parks, traffic signals, street signs, etc., and the support structures within a development.

INVESTMENT REVENUE: Revenue received as interest from the investment of funds not immediately required to meet cash disbursement obligations.

KEY OBJECTIVE: A statement of specific direction, purpose or intent based on the needs of the community and the goals established for a specific program.

LINE-ITEM BUDGET: A budget that lists detailed expenditure categories (salaries, materials, telephone charges, travel, etc.) separately, along with the amount budgeted for each specified category (Personnel, Operations, Capital).

GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS (continued)
City of La Cañada Flintridge 191 FY 2026-27 Budget

MUNICIPAL: In its broadest sense, an adjective which denotes the state and all subordinate units of government. In a more restricted sense, an adjective which denotes a city or village as opposed to other forms of local government.

OPERATING BUDGET: The portion of the budget which peratains to the daily operations of providing basic governmental services. The program budgets contained within the Annual Budget form the operational budget.

POLICY: A direction that must be followed in order to advance toward a goal. The direction can be a course of action or guiding principle.

PROGRAM: A grouping of activities organized to accomplish basic goals and objectives.

PROGRAM BUDGET: A budget that focuses upon the goals and objectives of an agency or jurisdiction rather than upon its organizational budget units or object classes of expenditure.

PROPERTY TAX: A statutory limited tax levy which may be imposed for any purpose.

RESERVE: That portion of a fund's balance designated and/or legally restricted for a specific purpose and is, therefore, not available for general appropriation.

REVENUE: Funds that the City receives as income. It includes such items as tax payments, fees from various services, receipts from other governments, fines, forfeitures, grants, shared income, and interest earnings.

RISK MANAGEMENT: An organized attempt to protect assets, in the most cost-effective manner, against accidental loss.

SALES TAX: A tax on the purchase of goods and services. The current sales tax rate in the City is 10.50%.

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT: A compulsory levy made against certain properties to defray part or all of the costs of a specific improvement or service deemed to primarily benefit those parties.

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: Proceeds from specific revenue sources (other than trusts or major capital projects) that are legally restricted for specific purposes.

SUBVENTIONS: Revenues collected by the State (or other level of government) which are allocated to a City on a formula basis. The major subventions received by the City from the State of California and County of Los Angeles include: sales tax, no/low property tax cities allocation, vehicle license fees, gas tax.

TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS: Also known as Fiduciary Fund Types, these funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for private individuals, organizations or other governmental agencies.

USER FEES: The payment of a fee for direct receipt of service by the party benefiting from the service.

WORKING CAPITAL: The difference between current assets and current liabilities.

GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS (continued)
City of La Cañada Flintridge 192 FY 2026-27 Budget

SALES TAX: Sales tax is levied on all tangible retail goods sold within the City of La Cañada Flintridge. A 10.50% tax is levied at the site where the sale is made with one percent remitted back to the City by the State.

FRANCHISE FEES: A franchise fee is charged for the privilege of using public rights-of-way and property within the City for public or private purposes.

REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER Collected by the County Auditor-Controller, it is based on the value of property TAX: sold or otherwise changed in title. The rate is proscribed by the State Revenue & Taxation Code.

PROPERTY TAX: Property Tax is collected by the County Auditor-Controller and is based on the full value of property as determined by the County Assessor's Office. The City of La Cañada Flintridge, upon incorporation, elected to become a "no/low property tax city," thus, does not assess a local property tax. As part of an equity distribution of property tax monies collected by the County, the City shares a small percentage of the County's property tax assessment.

BUSINESS LICENSE FEES: Fees collected by the City based on the type of business and number of employees. A home occupation permit is also required for residents who conduct businesses out of their homes.

FINES & FORFEITURES: Fines and forfeitures are remitted to the City from the Los Angeles County court system for legal violations (vehicle, municipal, and other code violations) which occur in the City.

REVENUE FROM OTHER Monies collected and/or received by other governmental agencies and remitted AGENCIES: to the City. The State and Metro collect and return the appropriate amounts of certain fees according to formulas established by law. The most significant of these fees include the Proposition A and C and Vehicle License Fees.

CHARGES FOR CURRENT These charges are directly assessed to individuals for specific services rendered SERVICES: by the City. They include: charges to process or issue building permits; costs to conduct engineering and plan reviews of building projects; fees associated with filing subdivisions, zone change requests and environmental assessments; reimbursement of costs for photocopies and supplies; and fees for the privilege of using public property in motion picture, still photography, radio broadcasting or television production.

SPECIAL FUND REVENUES: Monies which are received by the City which have a specific purpose and/or are restricted as to how they may be expended.

TRANS & USE TAX: A voter-approved local sales tax imposed on retail transactions within the city in addition to the statewide base sales tax rate.

GLOSSARY OF REVENUE SOURCES
City of La Cañada Flintridge 193 FY 2026-27 Budget

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Budget City of La Cañada Flintridge Section Divide

Resolution No. 26-xx

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA CAÑADA

FLINTRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge is desirous of establishing an Annual Budget for fiscal year 2026-27; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge has reviewed and considered budget documentation and has received input from the City’s commissions, citizens, staff and interested individuals;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA CAÑADA,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Budget, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted;
SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make expenditures in accordance with the FY 2026-27 Annual Budget as adopted with the exception of those expenditures that require the City Council approval in accordance with the ordinances, regulations and/or policies of the City. Such approval shall be secured as prescribed SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, which, shall in turn, have immediate effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2026. __________________________
Kim Bowman, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Tania Garcia, City Clerk

Resolution No. 26-xx

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney

Resolution No. 26-xx

STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss.

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE }
I, Tania Garcia, City Clerk of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-xx was adopted at an regular meeting of the La Cañada Flintridge City Council held on the 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote of the Council:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

_________________________
Tania Garcia, City Clerk

City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: June 16, 2026
Subject: Approve a Resolution Adopting the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27 at $30,477,789
Presenter: Terry Kim, Director of Finance
Proposed Action: Motion to approve attached Resolution Adopting the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27 at $30,477,789
Environmental Impact: None
Fiscal Impact: None
Discussion/Analysis:

Attached is the Resolution which adopts the City’s Appropriations Limit for FY 2026-27.

As shown on the attached “Exhibit A”, the City’s FY 2026-27 Appropriations Limit is $30,477,789, which is calculated as follows:

A Fiscal Year 2025-26 Appropriations Limit $29,151,400
B Inflation Factor (Change in California Per Capita Income) 1.0495 C Population Factor (Change in Los Angeles County
Population)

0.9962
D = B x C Multiplier for Appropriations Limit Calculation 1.0455 E = A x D Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Limit $30,477,789 The Appropriations Limit restricts the amount of revenue that local governments can appropriate; specifically, in any fiscal year, a local government cannot appropriate the “proceeds of taxes” in excess of the Limit. The revenues classified as “proceeds of taxes” include the City’s major tax revenue sources, including Property Tax, Sales Tax and several others (see the attached “Exhibit B”).

The revenues (i.e., “proceeds of taxes”) in the FY 2026-27 City’s Annual Budget subject to the Appropriations Limit, total $30,477,789, creating a margin of $9,857,379 by which the City is under the Limit ($30,477,789 minus $20,620,410 equals $9,857,379). Given the size of this gap (this year’s “proceeds of taxes” of $20,620,410 totals just 67.7% of the Appropriations Limit), it is unlikely that the City will exceed the Limit in the coming years without significant changes to the City’s tax structure.

Options:

1. Motion to approve attached Resolution Adopting the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27 at $30,477,789.

2. Defer action and provide direction to staff
Recommendation:

Option No. 1 - It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution Adopting the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27 at $30,477,789.

Attachments:

1. GANN Limit Reso_CC_AT1_6_3_26

2. GANN Limit Reso_CC_AT2_6_3_26

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 20-08

AND THE ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND SIGNATURE USE POLICY

ADOPTED THEREIN, AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED ELECTRONIC

RECORDS AND SIGNATURE USE POLICY
WHEREAS, on November 7, 1979, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 4, the addition of Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various limitations on the appropriations of state and local governments; and, WHEREAS, Article XIII B provided for establishing fiscal year 1978-79 and the adopted spending appropriation for that year as the base for calculating future years' appropriations limits; and,
WHEREAS, Article XIII B provided for establishing each fiscal year's limit by adjusting the immediately prior year's limit by a factor comprised of the change in local population combined with either the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index, whichever is less; and, WHEREAS, in June 1990, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 111 which amended Article XIII B of the California State Constitution to establish the limit originally calculated for fiscal year 1986-87 as a new adjustment base and to change the definition of the cost of living to be either the percentage change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year for the jurisdiction due to the addition of local non-residential new construction; and,
WHEREAS, Proposition 111 further modified Article XIII B requirements by making certain capital outlay, debt service, emergency and court ordered expenditures not subject to the limit and by allowing expenditures in excess of one year's limit to be offset by underexpenditures in an immediately following year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 111, formally elects to use county-wide population changes for Los Angeles County and California per capita income changes rather than U.S. Consumer Price Index changes in determining its Appropriations Limit for FY 2026-27. Be it further resolved that the City Council hereby adopts its Appropriations Limit for FY 2026-27 as $30,477,789.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2026. __________________________
Kim Bowman, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Tania Garcia, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss.

CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE }
I, Tania Garcia, City Clerk of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-xx was adopted at an regular meeting of the La Cañada Flintridge City Council held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote of the Council:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

_________________________
Tania Garcia, City Clerk

Exhibit A

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TABLE
Change in Expenditures Revenues
Appropriations Per Capita Change in to Limit to Limit
Year Limit Pers. Income Population Multiplier Margin Margin 1992-93 7,144,032 1.0272 1.0096 1.0371 813,282 3,748,382 1993-94 7,409,076 1.0071 1.0075 1.0147 433,801 3,880,476 1994-95 7,517,989 1.0472 1.0033 1.0506 793,739 3,824,339 1995-96 7,898,399 1.0467 1.0048 1.0517 925,924 4,020,199 1996-97 8,306,746 1.0467 1.0124 1.0597 841,246 4,266,346 1997-98 8,802,659 1.0415 1.0139 1.0559 (370,641) 4,510,684 1998-99 9,294,728 1.0453 1.0166 1.0626 (1,819,747) 4,526,428 1999-00 9,876,578 1.0491 1.0175 1.0675 (3,127,722) 4,951,303 2000-01 10,543,247 1.0782 1.0166 1.0960 (167,853) 5,255,897 2001-02 11,555,399 0.9873 1.0177 1.0047 7,202,049 6,170,299 2002-03 11,609,709 1.0231 1.0166 1.0400 (3,651,241) 6,016,659 2003-04 12,074,097 1.0328 1.0138 1.0470 (15,138,295) 6,724,030 2004-05 12,641,580 1.0684 1.0118 1.0810 (24,207,952) 7,297,148 2005-06 13,463,283 1.0396 1.0078 1.0477 (22,636,893) 7,183,182 2006-07 14,105,482 1.0442 1.0072 1.0517 (21,760,090) 6,988,310 2007-08 14,834,735 1.0429 1.0086 1.0518 (15,081,226) 7,294,949 2008-09 15,603,174 1.0062 1.0090 1.0153 (6,428,397) 8,066,653 2009-10 15,841,903 0.9746 1.0058 0.9803 (5,742,608) 7,130,067 2010-11 15,529,817 1.0251 1.0020 1.0272 (6,884,447) 7,613,928 2011-12 15,952,228 1.0377 1.0038 1.0416 (4,411,109) 7,895,466 2012-13 16,615,841 1.0512 1.0069 1.0585 (5,403,057) 8,663,343 2013-14 17,587,868 0.9977 1.0078 1.0055 (4,699,574) 8,380,126 2014-15 17,684,601 1.0382 1.0082 1.0467 (3,965,353) 8,701,672 2015-16 18,510,472 1.0537 1.0085 1.0627 (4,220,371) 9,240,679 2016-17 19,671,079 1.0369 0.9996 1.0365 (3,502,377) 9,958,673 2017-18 20,389,073 1.0367 1.0022 1.0390 (7,848,078) 10,189,722 2018-19 21,184,247 1.0385 0.9990 1.0375 (8,014,469) 10,323,326 2019-20 21,978,656 1.0373 0.9989 1.0362 (9,447,592) 10,323,326 2020-21 22,774,283 1.0573 0.9922 1.0491 (18,568,444) 11,552,256 2021-22 23,891,431 1.0755 0.9929 1.0679 (23,338,652) 12,160,548 2022-23 25,512,798 1.0444 0.9935 1.0376 (27,390,646) 11,873,629 2023-24 26,472,079 1.0362 0.9980 1.0341 (14,714,153) 10,286,307 2024-25 27,374,777 1.0644 1.0005 1.0649 (13,424,920) 9,302,720 2025-26 29,151,400 1.0495 0.9962 1.0455 (14,148,531) 9,857,379 2026-27 30,477,789

Formula: Old Appropriation Limit x Multiplier (i.e. Change in Per Capita Personal Income x Change in Population) To determine "Change in Population", use L.A. County Rate + 100 divided by 100 110

Exhibit B
REVENUES/EXPENDITURES TO APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT MARGIN FY 2026-27 Franchise Fees 849,560
Sales Tax 3,693,600 Municipal Code Fines 142,790
Transaction and Use Tax 3,744,900 Tree Ordinance 22,210 Real Property Transfer Tax 320,960 Parking Fines 20,860 Property Tax 7,965,740 Administrative Penalties 24,150
Property Tax (In-Lieu) 3,784,540 Film Permit Fees 19,280 Business License Fees 233,470 Zoning Fees 225,000
Vehicle License Fees 30,440 Geological Review Fees 85,000 Off-Highway Vehicle 0 Engineering and Administrative Review Fees 21,350 Interest Earnings 846,760 Environmental Assessment 10,000 Total 20,620,410 Use of Fields/Charging Station Fees 25,400 Lanterman Auditorium 180,310
Service Charges/Tobacco Lic. Fee/DAE Fee 7,120
Computer Innovation & Tracking Fee 83,340
General Plan Maintenance Fee 43,170
Building Permit Fees 1,750,000
Solid Waste Hauler Permit Fees 776,260
Revenues to Appropriation Limit Margin: Plan Check Fees 1,200,000 Specific Plan/Decal/Placard 25,880
30,477,789 Public Works Permits Fees 106,650
- 20,620,410 Industrial Waste Permit Fees 17,570
9,857,379 Miscellaneous Revenue/Donations 39,100
Public Works and Lighting Reimbursements 24,230
FEMA Refund/State Beverage Recycling Grant 128,360
Expenditures to Appropriation Limit Margin: Cerro Negro/Parking Lot Lease 6,000 Rental Income 238,770
30,477,789 Traffic Safety (Vehicle Code Fines) 63,000
- 44,626,320 * Gas Tax & Proposition 42 and Interest 1,184,210 (14,148,531) Bonds & Grants Fund and Interest 0
TDA SB 821 and Interest 16,960
CDBG 57,820
Federal Emergency Funds 12,600
Measure W and Interest 400,650
Sewer Improvement Funds (All) 32,970
Sewer Redemption Funds (All) 0
Sewer Debt Service Funds (All) 124,100
* From FY budget (total expenditures) Sewer Maint. Fund (04-1) 388,970 Measure R and Interest 349,060
Proposition C and Interest 472,620
Proposition A and Interest 546,560
Capital Projects Revenue 686,060
Measure M and Interest 384,400
SLESF 210,640
Civic Center Debt Service Fund 13,170
AQMD AB 2766/Interest 29,630
Total 11,045,780
Proceeds of Taxes (Revenue Subject to Limit) Non-Proceeds of Taxes (Revenue Not Subject to Limit) 111

City Council Agenda Report
Meeting Date: June 16, 2026
Subject: Discussion and Direction Regarding the Summer 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule
Presenter: Daniel Jordan, City Manager
Proposed Action: Discuss the upcoming Summer 2026 City Council meeting schedule and provide direction to staff regarding any desired changes or cancellations
Environmental Impact: None
Fiscal Impact: None
Background:

The City Council does not have a formal policy in place regarding its summer meeting schedule. In past years, the City Council has made informal decisions on a year-by-year basis to cancel certain meetings in July, August, and September.

Discussion/Analysis:

This report offers the City Council an opportunity to formally discuss and finalize the meeting calendar for Summer 2026, addressing whether to cancel, modify, or maintain the scheduled meetings. Key dates for the proposed regular City Council meetings in the summer months are as follows:
• July 21, 2026: This meeting includes the annual appointments of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, as well as the certification of the General Municipal Election results. • August 4, 2026: This meeting will consist of ongoing City business. • August 18, 2026: Traditionally, the second regular meeting scheduled in August is canceled.

The City Council could consider whether to follow this precedent this year. • September 1, 2026: Similar to the second regular meeting in August, the first meeting of September has typically been canceled in previous years, although this has not been formalized into a policy.

Staff is seeking direction from the City Council on how to proceed with scheduling and public notification. Staff recommends that the City Council engage in a discussion regarding the Summer 2026 meeting schedule and provide guidance on any proposed changes or cancellations. This discussion will not only assist in the scheduling process for the upcoming summer but will also help establish a consistent framework for future years.

Additionally, the City Council may consider whether to direct staff to return to a future meeting with a

proposed formal policy regarding summer meeting scheduling.

Options:

1. Discuss the upcoming Summer 2026 City Council meeting schedule and provide direction to staff regarding any desired changes or cancellations; or

2. Direct staff to return at a future meeting with a proposed formal policy; or

3. Defer action and provide direction to staff.

Recommendation:

Option No. 1 - It is recommended that the City Council take the following action(s): Discuss the upcoming Summer 2026 City Council meeting schedule and provide direction to staff regarding any desired changes or cancellations
Attachments:

None