Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Monterey City Council
December 17, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 17, 2024
Body
Monterey City Council
Pages
2
Original file
148.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on isearchmonterey.org. That file is the official record.

Council Chamber
580 Pacific St.

Monterey, California
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
and
Ocean View Plaza Community
Services District Meeting
Tuesday, December 17,
2024
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
2022-2024 City Council:

Mayor
Tyller Williamson
Councilmembers
Kim Barber, District 1
Gino Garcia, At Large
Alan Haffa, At Large
Ed Smith, District 2
2024-2026 City Council:

Mayor
Tyller Williamson
Councilmembers
Kim Barber, District 1
Ed Smith, District 2
Jean Rasch, District 3
Gino Garcia, District 4
City Manager
Hans Uslar
City Attorney
M. Christine Davi
HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING:
 In-Person: At the meeting location listed above.
 Remotely via ZoomGov webinar:
o On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 Zoom software must be up-to-date. For help, please use our Zoom Meeting Instructions. o By telephone dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another. Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 # If asked for participant ID, press #. To raise your hand: dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute.  This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (~10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).  Written comment: Emailed comments to [email protected] sent no later than ½ hour before the start of the meeting (sooner preferred) are not read aloud but are made available to the Council and public at monterey.gov/submitted-comments .

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS:

The total amount of time allocated for public comment on a particular issue and for each individual speaker is generally as follows:

1. Up to three minutes per speaker.

2. For regular City Council meetings, there are two 15-minute public comment periods, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Speakers may only comment during one session.

3. The total time allocated for public comment:
a. Items pulled from the consent agenda – 15 minutes each item b. Public Appearance items – 30 minutes each item
c. Public Hearing items – 30 minutes each item
d. Closed session items – 15 minutes each item
At the time an item is considered, the Mayor will ask those attending the meeting in person to line up at the podium or raise their hands, and for remote participants to use *9 on the telephone or the “raise hand” function in Zoom, if they wish to address the City Council. The maximum amount of time for each person to speak and the total amount of time allotted for each item will be determined based on the number of people indicating an interest in speaking and the amount of business to be conducted on the agenda. In exceptional circumstances and when necessary to ensure a full December 17, 2024
2 opportunity for public input, the Mayor may, with the legislative body’s consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt. Code §84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $250 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. ***Afternoon Session Agenda ***
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF THE 2022-2024 CITY COUNCIL

PRESENTATIONS

1. Recognition of Councilmember Alan Haffa (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

ELECTION CERTIFICATION AND COUNCIL INSTALLATION

2. Adopt a Resolution Reciting the Results of the November 5, 2024 Consolidated General Municipal Election, and Install Newly Elected Officers (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) ROLL CALL OF THE 2024-2026 CITY COUNCIL

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
The public may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

Approval of Minutes

3. December 3, 2024 Regular Meeting, Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, and Special Planning Commission Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Award of Construction Contracts

4. Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $821,249.00 to Kraemer Engineering Inc for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 5 ***CIP*** (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)

5. Award a Contract for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project to Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $210,000. (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) ***NCIP*** December 17, 2024
3 Ordinances
An ordinance is a law adopted by the City Council and codified in the City Code. Through the adoption of an ordinance, the City may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other laws not in conflict with state or federal law. An ordinance generally becomes effective 30 days after approval at a second reading.

6. 2nd Reading of a Zoning Ordinance to add a Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District (RHNAOV), Amend the Multifamily Overlay District Land Use Regulations and Development Standards, Rezone Properties to be Included in the Multifamily Residential and RHNAOV, Rezone 1200 Aguajito Road, and Amend Architectural Review Procedures (CEQA: Certified Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023080034), Article 11, Section 15168(c))

7. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Amending Monterey City Code Chapter 38, Section 38- 112.5 Density Bonus To Comply With State Housing Law And To Establish Local Density Incentives For Qualifying Housing Projects (CEQA: Certified Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023080034), Article 11, Section 15168(c)) Resolutions
A resolution is an expression of opinion or evidence of a decision made by the City Council and often relates to administrative business of the City. Resolutions generally become effective immediately upon adoption.

8. Authorize the Finance Director to Reimburse Funds in the Amount of $220,034.00 from the Neighborhood Improvement Fund to the Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) ***NCIP***

9. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with Monterey One Water for Services Related to Collection of the City’s Sewer Collection Fee on the Monterey County Tax Roll to Include FY 2024-25 for Costs Not-to-Exceed $24,355.32 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

10. Award a Contract for the Purchase and Installation of a New Station Alerting System in Fire Stations 11, 12 and 13 in the amount of $358,279.77 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

11. Appropriate $325,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to 30 Fisherman’s Wharf Deck Repairs (CIP2514) ***CIP*** (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1)

12. Approve the Amended FY2024/25 Salary Schedule for Regular Full-Time and Regular Part-Time Employees Effective January 1, 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Other

13. Appoint Councilmember Garcia as Vice Mayor for 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

14. Receive Mayor’s Recommendation and Appoint David Stocker to the Building and Housing Appeals Board (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061)
*** End of Consent Agenda ***
December 17, 2024
4 Adjourn to Ocean View Community Services District Meeting: Consent Agenda This is a separate legal body of the City that oversees the operations of the Ocean View Community Services District desalinization plant. All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the CSD or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

15. Receive Ocean View Community Services District Report (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Adjourn to City Council Meeting

PUBLIC APPEARANCE
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

16. Appoint Council Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Boards and Committees for 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECESS

RECONVENE
*** Evening Session Agenda ***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.

No discussion of a new item will be started after 10:30 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED
Any person who did not offer a general public comment in the afternoon session may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

17. Approve the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan 2024 Update (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, 15306, Class 6)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their activities. In addition, Councilmember or the City Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information. (Government Code section 54954.2(a)(3).)

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
The City Manager may make a brief report on their activities or a brief announcement. They may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.

ADJOURNMENT
December 17, 2024
5 Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.gov/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours. All comments and materials provided to the Council become part of the public record. Members of the public who comment in any fashion on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $250 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings.

Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance.

Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including disabled people in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact [email protected] or (831) 646-3935.

Notification 30+ hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

CITY OF MONTEREY 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES: (831) 646-3799 or [email protected] Upcoming city meetings are listed at monterey.gov/agendas For more information, call (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Recognition of Councilmember Alan Haffa (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

City staff will deliver a special presentation to Councilmember Alan Haffa for his outstanding leadership and service to the Monterey community. The Council, staff, and public are invited to make remarks recognizing outgoing Councilmember Alan Haffa, who has served the City of Monterey as Councilmember from December, 2012 to December, 2024.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes, and appreciates input from all.

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 6 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Reciting the Results of the November 5, 2024 Consolidated General Municipal Election, and Install Newly Elected Officers (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution reciting the facts of the November 5, 2024 election, declaring elected the persons for whom the highest number of votes were cast for each office, and the results of Measures V, W, X, and Y, and install the newly elected officers.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes, and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The certification of election results is required under the California Elections Code and the Monterey City Charter.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: None.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 7 №10/24
DISCUSSION:

On June 4, 2024, the Council adopted Resolution No. 24-091 C.S., consolidating the municipal election for the offices of Mayor and two City Councilmembers with the presidential general election on November 5, 2024. On July 16, 2024, the Council adopted Resolution No. 24-119 C.S., which added to the consolidation four ballot measures that would amend the City Charter.

The City thereafter contracted with the County of Monterey’s Registrar of Voters (“ROV”) to conduct the election and tally the votes.

Pursuant to the California Elections Code, the ROV prepared a certified statement of the results of the election and submitted that certified statement to the City within 30 days of the election.

California Elections Code also requires the governing body of a city to pass a resolution reciting the fact of the election, once certified. Adoption of the resolution will allow the new City Council to be seated and finalize the enactment of Measures V, W, X, and Y. The Oath of Office must be administered to the newly elected City Councilmembers and Mayor by the City Clerk, as required by the Constitution of the State of California, and certificates of election are presented to the newly elected officials.

CBK
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution with ROV’s certificates attached as Exhibit A through G) Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

DECLARING RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024
WHEREAS, a Consolidated General Municipal Election was held in the City of Monterey on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, in accordance with law, and pursuant to the Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 24-091 C.S. on June 4, 2024, calling for, and requesting consolidation of, the election for the purpose of electing the following municipal officers of said City:

One (1) Mayor for a two (2) year term, representing the City of Monterey at-large; One (1) Council Member for a four (4) year term, representing District 3; and One (1) Council Member for a four (4) year term, representing District 4; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 24-119 C.S. on July 16, 2024, submitting the following City of Monterey charter amendment measures to the qualified voters of the City on the November 5, 2024 ballot:

Ballot Measure V, “City Charter Clerical Corrections and Clarifications,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to delete obsolete provisions, resolve contradictions, update procedures for the adoption of ordinances, and clarify that the Library Board appoints or removes the Library Director, who is responsible for administering the Library Board’s collections policy and appointing and removing other Library employees;
Ballot Measure W, “Councilmember Filing as Candidate for Mayor,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to specify that the term of office for a Councilmember filing for Mayor expires when their successor is appointed or 40 days after the election, whichever occurs first; remove the five extra days for the candidate filing period; and other clerical, non-substantive changes to sections regarding the Mayor and City Councilmembers;
Ballot Measure X, “Mayor and Councilmember Term Limits,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to provide that no person shall hold elective office for more than 12 years, whether held in the office of Mayor, City Councilmember, or combination of both offices; and
Ballot Measure Y, “Leases of Real Property,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to allow the City to lease City real property to qualified nonprofit organizations, governmental entities, or educational institutions, on terms and rates that serve the community benefit;
WHEREAS, the city contracted with the Monterey County Registrar of Voters (“ROV”) to conduct the election and tally the votes, also referred to as a “canvas of votes cast.” The ROV canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, and the results are received, attached, and made a part hereof as Exhibits “A” through “G”; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 9 the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY, and pursuant to California Elections Code section 10264, that it hereby enters on its records a statement of the November 5, 2024 elections results as follows:

1. The total number of ballots cast in the City of Monterey was 13,178.

2. The names of the persons voted for, the office each person was voted for, and the total number of votes in the City to each person is as follows:

OFFICE CANDIDATE TOTAL VOTES
Mayor Monique Kaldy 3,960
Mayor Tyller Williamson 8,080
Councilmember, District 3 Jean Rasch 1,208
Councilmember, District 3 Eric Palmer 1,195
Councilmember, District 4 Gene “Gino” Garcia 1,522
Councilmember, District 4 Brian Perez 1,337

3. The number of votes given at each precinct to each person is as certified by the Monterey County Registrar of Voters in the official Certificates of Election included as Exhibits “A” (Mayor), “B” (Councilmember, District 3), and “C” (Councilmember, District 4).

4. The measures voted upon at the election are as follows:

Measure V:

YES
City Charter Clerical Corrections and
Clarifications. Shall the measure to amend the
City’s Charter to delete obsolete provisions,
resolve contradictions, update procedures for
the adoption of ordinances, and clarify that the
Library Board appoints or removes the Library
Director, who is responsible for administering
the Library Board’s collections policy and
appointing and removing other Library
employees, be adopted?
NO
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 4, Packet Page 10 Measure W:

YES
Councilmember Filing as Candidate for Mayor.

Shall the measure to amend the City’s Charter
to specify that the term of office for a
Councilmember filing for Mayor expires when
their successor is appointed or 40 days after
the election, whichever occurs first; remove
the five extra days for the candidate filing
period; and other clerical, non-substantive
changes to sections regarding the Mayor and
City Councilmembers, be adopted?
NO
Measure X:

YES
Mayor and City Councilmember Term Limits.

Shall the measure to amend the City’s Charter
to provide that no person shall hold elective
office for more than 12 years, whether held in
the office of Mayor, City Councilmember, or
combination of both offices, be adopted?
NO
Measure Y:

YES
Leases of Real Property. Shall the measure
to amend the City’s Charter to allow the City to
lease City real property to qualified nonprofit
organizations, governmental entities, or
educational institutions, on terms and rates
that serve the community benefit, be adopted?
NO

5. The total numbers of votes cast in favor of and in opposition to the measures are listed as follows:

MEASURE YES VOTES NO VOTES
Measure V 8,707 2,656
Measure W 8,730 2,355
Measure X 9,440 2,370
Measure Y 9,103 2,449

6. The number of votes given at each precinct for and against each measure is as certified by the Monterey County Registrar of Voters in the official Certificates included as Exhibits “D” (Measure V), “E” (Measure W), “F” (Measure X), and “G” (Measure Y).

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 5, Packet Page 11 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does declare and determine that Tyller Williamson was elected to the office of Mayor for the full term of two years, Jean Rasch was elected to the office of Councilmember, District 3 for the full term of four years, and Gene “Gino” Garcia was elected to the office of Councilmember, District 4 for the full term of four years, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to immediately deliver to Tyller Williamson, Jean Rasch, and Gene “Gino” Garcia each a Certificate of Election, signed by the City Clerk and authenticated, and to administer to each of said elected persons the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California, and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does declare and determine that as a result of the election:
a majority of the voters voting on Ballot Measure V, “City Charter Clerical Corrections and Clarifications,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to delete obsolete provisions, resolve contradictions, update procedures for the adoption of ordinances, and clarify that the Library Board appoints or removes the Library Director, who is responsible for administering the Library Board’s collections policy and appointing and removing other Library employees, did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried and so shall be deemed adopted and ratified; a majority of the voters voting on Ballot Measure W, “Councilmember Filing as Candidate for Mayor,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to specify that the term of office for a Councilmember filing for Mayor expires when their successor is appointed or 40 days after the election, whichever occurs first; remove the five extra days for the candidate filing period; and other clerical, nonsubstantive changes to sections regarding the Mayor and City Councilmembers, did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried and so shall be deemed adopted and ratified;
a majority of the voters voting on Ballot Measure X, “Mayor and Councilmember Term Limits,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to provide that no person shall hold elective office for more than 12 years, whether held in the office of Mayor, City Councilmember, or combination of both offices, did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried and so shall be deemed adopted and ratified; and a majority of the voters voting on Ballot Measure Y, “Leases of Real Property,” asking the voters of the City of Monterey to amend the City’s Charter to allow the City to lease City real property to qualified nonprofit organizations, governmental entities, or educational institutions, on terms and rates that serve the community benefit, did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried and so shall be deemed adopted and ratified; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall submit three copies of the charter amendments to the Monterey County Recorder and the Secretary of State pursuant to California Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 6, Packet Page 12 Elections Code section 34460, with the documentation required by subsections (a)-(c) of that code.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 7, Packet Page 13 EXHIBIT A Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 8, Packet Page 14 EXHIBIT A Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 9, Packet Page 15 EXHIBIT A Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 10, Packet Page 16 EXHIBIT A Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 11, Packet Page 17 EXHIBIT A Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 12, Packet Page 18 EXHIBIT B Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 13, Packet Page 19 EXHIBIT B Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 14, Packet Page 20 EXHIBIT B Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 15, Packet Page 21 EXHIBIT C Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 16, Packet Page 22 EXHIBIT C Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 17, Packet Page 23 EXHIBIT C Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 18, Packet Page 24 EXHIBIT D Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 19, Packet Page 25 EXHIBIT D Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 20, Packet Page 26 EXHIBIT D Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 21, Packet Page 27 EXHIBIT D Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 22, Packet Page 28 EXHIBIT D Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 23, Packet Page 29 EXHIBIT E Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 24, Packet Page 30 EXHIBIT E Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 25, Packet Page 31 EXHIBIT E Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 26, Packet Page 32 EXHIBIT E Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 27, Packet Page 33 EXHIBIT E Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 28, Packet Page 34 EXHIBIT F Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 29, Packet Page 35 EXHIBIT F Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 30, Packet Page 36 EXHIBIT F Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 31, Packet Page 37 EXHIBIT F Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 32, Packet Page 38 EXHIBIT F Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 33, Packet Page 39 EXHIBIT G Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 34, Packet Page 40 EXHIBIT G Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 35, Packet Page 41 EXHIBIT G Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 36, Packet Page 42 EXHIBIT G Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 37, Packet Page 43 EXHIBIT G Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 38, Packet Page 44

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

JOINT MEETING OF COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION

AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, December 3, 2024
4:00 PM 7:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Planning Manager, Police Senior Administrative Analyst, Police Lieutenant, Senior Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, Assistant Police Chief, Lieutenant, Recreation Manager, Assistant Finance Director, Administrative Clerk (Police), Police Services Assistant, Police Records/Detention Supervisor, Police Officer, Park Maintenance Worker
***Afternoon Session Agenda ***

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m.

PRESENTATIONS

1. Recognize City Employees for Milestone Anniversaries and Retirements for 4th Quarter 2024 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Recognized employees
City Manager Uslar and Police Chief Hober gave the staff presentation, verbally recognizing Parks Operations Manager Marcuzzo, Communications Manager Huelga, Purchasing Analyst Linsao, Police Records and Detention Supervisor Murphy, Parks Maintenance Worker Sanico, and Senior Administrative Analyst Faurot. Park Maintenance Worker Sanico made remarks reflecting on his life and career.

Public comment was received from Eric Palmer, who praised the work of Communications Manager Huelga, and Lorna Moffat, who praised the work of Park Operations Manager Marcuzzo.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Steve Lightfoot, Chinyere Ogbonna, and Bryan Rosen.

CONSENT AGENDA
Public comment on the Consent Items was received from Bryan Rosen, who expressed concerns about the costs and priorities associated with Items 3, 4, 5, and 6; and Lorna Moffat, Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 45 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
2 who provided suggestions for improving storm drains and commented on parking. The Council made brief remarks in favor of the matters in question, stating that the funding recommendations were sound.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the CONSENT AGENDA:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Approval of Minutes

2. November 19, 2024 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved
Resolutions

3. Approve the Purchase of Three Parking Enforcement GO-4s in the Amount of $121,578.53 from Turf Star, Inc. (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-181 C.S.

4. Amending Resolution 24-157, Authorizing the Purchase of Banquet Chairs from Mity-Lite, Inc. in the Amount of $390,638.90 for the Monterey Conference Center (Not a Project Under CEQA, per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-182 C.S.

5. Award a Professional Services Agreement in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $561,912 to G7ei Inc. for a Storm Drain Master Plan and Stormwater Utility Rate Study and Authorize the Finance Director to Establish an Interfund Loan and Appropriate Funds in the Amount of $350,000 from the General Fund’s Unassigned Fund Balance to the Storm Water Utility Fund Professional Services Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, 15306, Class 6) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-183 C.S.

6. Awarding Three Professional Service Agreements for On-Call Project Management/Construction Management (Building Facilities) for Projects within the City of Monterey with a Not-To-Exceed Limit of $750,000.00 Each to: (1) Ausonio, Incorporated; (2) CSG Consultants, Inc.; and (3) Wilsey Ham ***CIP/NCIP*** (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution Nos. 24-184, 24-185, and 24-186 C.S. *** End of Consent Agenda ***

PUBLIC APPEARANCE

7. Measure P and S (Special Sales Tax) Annual Report on Conformity with Requirement that Expenditures be Used Exclusively for the Rehabilitation, Repair, and Improvement of City Streets, Sidewalks, and Storm Drains and Disabled Access Improvements (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Received report
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 46 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
3 Finance Director King and City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Easterling gave the staff presentation, with input from Measure P & S Oversight Committee Chair Aldinger and prior Chair Chorbajian. Finance Director King, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Easterling, and City Manager Uslar answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from Esther Malkin, who said that North Fremont needed attention, and that affordable housing should be prioritized for future measures.

The Council discussed the matter, noting that it had been an integral part of the success of the past ballot measures that there had been sunset dates attached to the tax. It was expressed that the tax should be continued in some form to continue to maintain the roads for the community. It was requested that the City improve coordination with utilities when they cause damage to the City's streets.

RECESS
The Council recessed at 5:38 p.m.

RECONVENE
The Council reconvened at 7:01 p.m.
*** Evening Session Agenda ***

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Garcia led the Pledge.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Bob Faulis and Lorna Moffat.

ADJOURN TO JOINT SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL AND PLANNING

COMMISSION, AND ESTABLISH QUORUM OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Council adjourned to the joint special meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission. City Clerk Klein called the roll of the Planning Commission, reflecting attendance as follows:

Commissioners Present: Bluth, Brassfield, Fletcher, Freeman, Latasa, Silva Commissioner Absent: Dawson

PUBLIC HEARING (EVENING)

8. I. Staff Presentation to Planning Commission and City Council on Housing Element Implementation Agenda Items 8(II), (III), and (IV)
II. Adjourn from Joint Meeting to Planning Commission Special Meeting: Planning Commission Adopt a Resolution Recommending that the City Council:

A. Accept the Planning Office Determination that the Proposed Housing Element Implementation Actions are Consistent with and within the Scope of the Monterey 2031 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2023080034) in Accordance with CEQA Article 11, Section 15168;
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 47 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
4 B. Take the following Housing Element Implementation actions:

1. Amend the Land Use Regulations and Development Standards Including Height, Density, Setbacks, and Parking Requirements in the North Fremont, Downtown, and Lighthouse Specific Plans;

2. Adopt a Zoning Ordinance to Add a Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District (RHNAOD), Amend the Multifamily Overlay District Land Use Regulations and Development Standards, Rezone Properties to be Included in the Multifamily Residential and RHNAOD, Rezone 1200 Aguajito Rd., and Amend Architectural Review Procedures; and

3. Amend the Density Bonus Ordinance to Comply with State Housing Law and to Establish Development Incentives for Qualifying Housing Projects.

III. Adjourn from Planning Commission Special Meeting and Reconvene to City Council Regular Meeting to Consider Planning Commission Recommendation and Adopt Resolutions:

A. Accepting the Planning Office Determination that the Proposed Housing Element Implementation Actions are Consistent with and within the Scope of the Monterey 2031 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2023080034) in Accordance with CEQA Article 11, Section 15168; and
B. Amending the Land Use Regulations and Development Standards Including Height, Density, Setbacks, and Parking Requirements in the North Fremont, Downtown, and Lighthouse Specific Plans.

IV. City Council Consider Planning Commission Recommendation and Adopt Ordinances to Implement the Housing Element:

A. Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Add a Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District (RHNAOV), Amending the Multifamily Overlay District Land Use Regulations and Development Standards, Rezone Properties to be Included in the Multifamily Residential and RHNAOV, Rezone 1200 Aguajito Road, and Amend Architectural Review Procedures; and B. Amending Chapter 38, Section 38-112.5 Density Bonus to Comply with State Housing Law and to Establish Local Development Incentives for Qualifying Housing Projects.

Action: Held public hearing; Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. P24-029 (6- 0-1, Commissioner Dawson absent), P24-030 by two votes: regarding the North Fremont Specific Plan (4-0-1-2, Commissioner Dawson absent, Commissioners Brassfield and Fletcher recused), and regarding the Downtown and Lighthouse Specific Plans (6-0-1, Commissioner Dawson absent), P24-031 (6-0-1, Commissioner Dawson absent), and P24- 032 (6-0-1, Commissioner Dawson absent); and City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 24- 187 C.S. and 24-188 C.S, passed to print the zoning ordinance as amended to increase the height limit on the developable part of Garden Road to 45 feet, and passed to print the ordinance to amend Monterey City Code Sec. 38-112.5 relating to density bonus Planning Manager Hill gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' and Planning Commissioners' questions.

Public comment was received from: Jean Rasch, who asked questions of staff; Laura Davis of LandWatch Monterey County, Gabe Sanders of Opportunity Housing Trust, and Matt Huerta of Monterey Bay Economic Partnership, who all spoke in favor of the staff recommendation; Tom Reeves, who spoke about impacts to the Lighthouse area and asked for attention to be paid to the issue of emergency egress; and Brad Slama, who requested that the maximum height for the Garden Road developable area be increased to 45 feet, stating it would make it more possible to develop a project at the needed density.

Planning Manager Hill addressed questions that had arisen during public comment, explaining how the number of various rate units were determined for development, and stating that the actual number would be continually monitored over the eight year period and that additional zoning changes can be made if trends or patterns developed.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 48 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
5 The Council adjourned and the Planning Commission convened to its special meeting.

Chair Bluth called the special meeting of the Planning Commission to order. City Attorney Davi led the Planning Commission through the conflict of interest disclosure process.

On a motion by Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Silva, and passed by the following roll-call vote, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P24-029 recommending the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the CEQA review environmental checklist and Planning Office determination that implementation of Housing Element programs 1-b, 1-c, 1-l, 2-a, 2-f, and 3-c are consistent with and within the scope of the Monterey 2031 General Plan EIR (SCH# 2023080034) in accordance with CEQA Article 11, Section 15168:

AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Bluth, Brassfield, Fletcher, Freeman, Latasa, Silva NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
Commissioners Fletcher and Brassfield left the Chamber due to conflicts of interest based on their property ownership within the North Fremont Specific Plan area. They left the Chamber.

The Planning Commission discussed the specific matter of amending the land use regulations and development standards including height, density, setbacks, and parking requirements in the North Fremont Specific Plan. It was stated that the City was forced to take this action, due to State requirements. Some concern was expressed that people would not take alternative transportation. It was expressed that recommending the changes were not a problem and that the City staff had done a great job of reviewing the City's geography and zoning and finding locations for potential additional units.

On a motion by Commissioner Latasa, seconded by Commissioner Freeman, and passed by the following roll-call vote, the Planning Commission approved the North Fremont Specific Plan portion of Resolution No. P24-030, recommending that the City Council amend the land use regulations and development standards including height, density, setbacks, and parking requirements in the North Fremont Specific Plan:

AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Bluth, Freeman, Latasa, Silva
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
RECUSED: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Fletcher
Commissioners Fletcher and Brassfield returned to the Chamber.

On a motion by Commissioner Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Brassfield, and passed by the following roll-call vote, the Planning Commission adopted the remainder of Resolution No.

P24-030, recommending that the City Council amend the land use regulations and development standards including height, density, setbacks, and parking requirements in the Downtown and Lighthouse Specific Plans:

AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Bluth, Brassfield, Fletcher, Freeman, Latasa, Silva NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 49 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
6 On a motion by Commissioner Brassfield, seconded by Commissioner Latasa, and passed by the following roll-call vote, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P24-031, recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance to add a Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District (RHNAOV), amend the Multifamily Overlay District land use regulations and development standards, rezone properties to be included in the Multifamily Residential and RHNAOV, rezone 1200 Aguajito Road, and amend architectural review procedures:

AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Bluth, Brassfield, Fletcher, Freeman, Latasa, Silva NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
On a motion by Commissioner Silva, seconded by Commissioner Latasa, and passed by the following roll-call vote, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P24-032, recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Monterey City Code Chapter 38, Section 38-112.5 Density Bonus to comply with State housing law and to establish local density bonus incentives for qualifying housing projects:

AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Bluth, Brassfield, Fletcher, Freeman, Latasa, Silva NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: (None)
The Planning Commission adjourned from the special meeting and the City Council convened to its regular meeting.

Planning Manager Hill answered Councilmembers' questions. Regarding the request for a 45- foot height limit in the Garden Road developable area, he said that it seemed reasonable, and that staff would be open to increased height limits. He said that adopting development standards that would allow for density was appropriate, and that if the Council desired to amend the ordinance by increasing the height limit, they could do so. He explained that staff anticipated that they would start to see more affordable units because of of the density bonuses. He said that the City was currently working on obtaining a "prohousing" status with the State, and that a congrategational overlay was slated to come forward in the eight year planning period.

Public comment was received from Planning Commissioner Brassfield, who complemented the Planning Commission and City staff and said that residents needed to acknowledge the compromises and decisions required to meet State requirements and the community's needs.

On a motion by Councilmember Barber, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the Council adopted Resolution No. 24-187 C.S. accepting the CEQA review environmental checklist and Planning Office determination that implementation Of Housing Element Programs 1-b, 1-c, 1-l, 2-a, 2-f, and 3-c are consistent with and within the scope of the Monterey 2031 General Plan EIR (SCH# 2023080034) in accordance with CEQA Article 11, Section 15168:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 50 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
7 A motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Barber, to adopt Resolution No. 24-188 C.S. amending the land use regulations and development standards including height, density, setbacks, and parking requirements in the North Fremont, Downtown, and Lighthouse Specific Plans.

The Council discussed the matter. It was stressed that the City was working hard and continually looking for housing opportunities. It was noted that there were financial and logistical barriers to building housing, especially inclusionary housing. It was stated that the State had changed its rules and that Monterey was not the only city that would struggle with building the required number of Regional Housing Needs Analsysis (RHNA) housing units. It was stressed that density concerns, water availability, and State overreach were legitimate issues. Other factors mentioned were profitability, interest rates, and how many stories were needed on a building for the development to "pencil out" financially for a developer. It was stated that inclusionary housing units were essentially subsidized, and that unless the City were to shift its priorities to allocate funds or land, the required number of units was not likely to be built in the next eight years. It was asserted that the system was currently broken but that with advocacy, perhaps change could be effected for the next cycle.

In response to a Planning Commissioner's concern about people not being willing to use alternative forms of transportation, it was asserted that more people would do so if the City's bicycle infrastructure were complete and safe and the transit system were effective. It was stated that as the City grew in density, there would be greater demand for transit and bicycle infrastructure. It was asserted that there was value in creating an environment that allowed carfree transportation, and that this Council action was one of the first steps in that direction.

In defense of the State, it was noted that it was difficult to create policy that could address the needs of every individual jurisdiction. It was asserted that the State did not make its policies in a vacuum and that over time, agencies had continued to fail to implement policies needed to address housing, and the State had to take some action. Full confidence was expressed in the City's ability to achieve the required RHNA numbers. It was stated that in thinking about changing transportation methods and availability, the City could reduce traffic impact and emissions and improve residents' quality of life. It was stressed that the City needed to work with all stakeholders and needed to be flexible and nimble for housing developers.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
A motion was introduced by Councilmember Haffa, and seconded by Councilmember Garcia, to pass to print a zoning ordinance to add a Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District (RHNAOV), amend the Multifamily Overlay District land use regulations and development standards, rezone properties to be included in the multifamily residential and RHNAOV, rezone 1200 Aguajito Road, and amend architectural review procedures, as amended to increase the height limit on the developable part of Garden Road to 45 feet.

The Council discussed the motion. There was some hesitation for supporting the height increase until City staff had had the chance to evaluate the suggestion. On the other hand, concern was expressed that a developer was ready and interested in moving forward and that the proposed height limit would help the likelihood of his ability to build housing. On question from the Council, Planning Manager Hill said that staff was not overly concerned with adjusting Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 7, Packet Page 51 City Council Minutes December 3, 2024
8 the height to 45 feet, which he said seemed reasonable and would be in line with other zoning recommendations.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
On a motion by Councilmember Haffa, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the Council passed to print an ordinance amending Monterey City Code Chapter 38, Section 38-112.5 Density Bonus to comply with State housing law and to establish local density incentives for qualifying housing projects:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Barber thanked everyone involved in the Housing Element implementation for their hard work. She acknowledged that there were many complex components to this effort and said that it was fascinating and admirable how City staff and the Planning Commission kept up with it alll while remaining compliant and ahead of required timelines.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Uslar reported on details of a recent water main rupture at the intersection of Fremont Street and Camino El Estero and a recent power outage. He announced that the election had been certified and congratulated the winning Monterey candidates, including Councilmember-Elect Rasch who was present in the audience, and Councilmember Garcia and Mayor Williamson who were present at the dais. He invited all to the tree lighting on December 6, 2024.

ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned at 9:23 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 8, Packet Page 52 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Christian Mercado, Engineering Projects Manager SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $821,249.00 to Kraemer Engineering Inc for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 5 ***CIP*** (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the plans and specifications for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 5 (35C1553) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Kraemer Engineering Inc, in the amount of $821,249.00;

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications;

5. Authorizing staff to spend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project; and

6. Authorize the Finance Director, or their designee, to modify contract funding sources within the approved not-to-exceed amount of the contract, including contingency.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns;” Fiscal Stewardship – “Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement;” and Active Mobility – “Maintain and repair core street, roadway, and storm drain infrastructure.” This action Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 53 №10/24
is in accordance with Chapter 28-Purchasing of the City Code, which requires Public Works project contract awards exceeding $150,000 to be approved by City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On November 12, 2024, ten (10) bids were received and opened by the Finance Director’s designee as follows:

Bidder Total Bid
Kraemer Engineering Inc $821,249.00
McKim Corporation $859,960.50
Monterey Peninsula Engineering $882,685.00
Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc $918,918.00
The Don Chapin Company $966,668.00
Precision Grade Inc $979,300.00
Granite Rock Company $1,099,322.00
Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction, Inc. $1,127,685.00 Mountain Cascade, Inc. $1,305,394.75
Granite Construction Company $1,405,091.00
Basis of award for this project is based on the Total Bid.

Estimated Construction Cost:

Total Bid $821,249.00
Construction Contingency (15%) $123,187.35
Total Construction Cost (This Authorization) $944,436.35 Construction Management (City Staff & Indirect Cost) $123,187.35 Total Estimated Cost to Complete the Project $1,067,623.70 Available Funding Sources:
35C1553 (Pavement) $8,509,552.20
35C1555 (ADA) $6,588,417.41
Estimated Funding Breakdown (excludes contingency):
35C1553 (Pavement) $509,379.81
35C1555 (ADA) $311,869.19
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 54 №10/24
The Project is funded by the Measure P/S-Pavement (35C1553) and Measure P/S-ADA (35C1555) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project accounts. The construction contract base bid can be broken out into various bid items where $509,379.81 of work is related to pavement maintenance and $311,869.19 of work is related to ADA upgrades. The contingency budget may be necessary for either ADA upgrades or pavement maintenance. The exact amount necessary cannot be predicted and staff recommends authorizing the Finance Director, or their designee, to modify contract funding sources within the approved not-to-exceed amount of the contract. As of November 11, 2024, the project accounts have an available funding balance of $8,509,552.20, and $6,588,417.41 respectively. Therefore, funding is available in the project accounts to award the project with contingencies.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of ADA improvements at Hoffman, Prescott and Drake; and pavement maintenance for all of Hawthorne (from David to the Presidio). The work consists of, but is not limited to, demolition and construction of concrete curbs, gutter, cross gutter, sidewalk and curb ramps, associated storm drain modifications, and hot mix asphalt pavement and pavement seal coating. All work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 55 №10/24
Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project would not impact historic resources as project improvements would only occur in the public right-of-way. The project is located in a sensitive archeological area as shown on the General Plan EIR Figure 8. A Cultural Resource Constraints Review dated July 31, 2024 was conducted by archeologist Angie Moniz. The review concluded a qualified archeologist monitor shall be required to monitor all ground disturbing activities during construction. Therefore, there would be no impacts to historic or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the construction contract for this Project. However, this is not recommended. The proposed project implements upgrades necessary for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DISCUSSION:

The Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Phase 5 (Hawthorne) consists of pavement improvements along Hawthorne Street between David Avenue and Presidio of Monterey boundary. Pavement improvements include dig-out repairs, Type II Slurry Seal, and full reconstruction.

The Title II Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations require local agencies to upgrade curb ramps when altering roads. As a result, the project also consists of curb ramp improvements to eight locations (two intersections) along Hawthorne Street. The project would reconstruct existing pedestrian ramps to achieve compliance with current ADA standards.

These improvements help the City implement steps identified in the ADA Transition Plan and create a more walkable and accessible neighborhood.

The intersections scheduled for curb ramp improvements include:
 Prescott Avenue at Hawthorne Street
 Hoffman Avenue at Hawthorne Street
These locations are subject to change due to conditions in the built environment.

The project is anticipated to start in the spring of 2025.

Measure P/S is a 1% sales tax approved by voters in 2014 and continued in 2018 for the purpose of fixing street, sidewalks, and storm drain systems. Since its adoption, revenue from the tax has effectively improved the City’s accessibility. Measure P/S funds are a dedicated and reliable source for fixing and maintaining the City’s streets, curb ramps, sidewalks, and storm drains. Without this resource, the City would not be able to maintain its streets and sidewalks to the same level of service.

The project plans and specifications were developed by City staff and consultants, Whitson Engineers. The project was advertised for construction bids on the City’s eProcurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement on Tuesday, October 1, 2024. Ten (10) bids were received and opened Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 56 №10/24
by the Finance Director’s designee on Tuesday, November 12, 2024. The lowest responsive responsible bid was submitted by Kraemer Engineering Inc, in the amount of $821,249.00 Upon completion of the bid opening, McKim Corporation, which was the second lowest bidder, submitted a bid protest stating that Kraemer Engineering Inc., did not meet the “Bidder’s Statement of Qualifications” as outlined in the City’s eProcurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement. Staff completed an investigation, per MCC Section 28-13, and determined that Kraemer Engineering Inc was qualified and therefore rejected the bid protest.

Public Works staff performed reference checks on the following projects recently completed by Kraemer Engineering Inc:

1. Project Name: Torre Avenue Improvements
Public Agency: City of Cupertino

2. Project Name: HSIP 10 Crossing Improvements
Public Agency: City of Santa Cruz

3. Project Name: San Juan Bautista ADA Improvements
Public Agency: City of San Juan Bautista
The positive feedback received by Staff while conducting reference checks determined that Kraemer Engineering Inc has shown to be responsive, professional, and provide quality work.

Although Kraemer Engineering Inc has not performed work for the City of Monterey, Public Works Department staff is confident in their ability to complete the project.

AR/cm
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Bid Tabulation
e: Kraemer Engineering Inc
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 5, Packet Page 57 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $821,249.00 TO

KRAEMER ENGINEERING INC FOR THE CITYWIDE ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT, PHASE 5 ***CIP***
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of November 2024, at 2:00 p.m. the City of Monterey Finance Director’s designee received ten (10) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 5 (35c1553) (“Project”);
WHEREAS, Kraemer Engineering Inc, McKim Corporation, Monterey Peninsula Engineering, Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc., The Don Chapin Company, Precision Grade Inc., Granite Rock Company, Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction, Inc., Mountain Cascade, Inc., Granite Construction Company submitted responsive, responsible bids for the Project;
WHEREAS, the basis of award for the project was the Total Base Bid; WHEREAS, Kraemer Engineering Inc submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid in the amount of $821,249.00;
WHEREAS, the construction contract base bid can be broken out into various bid items where $509,379.81 of work is related to pavement maintenance and $311,869.19 of work is related to ADA upgrades;
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in accounts 35C1553 and 35C1555 to complete the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of ADA improvements at Hoffman, Prescott and Drake; and pavement maintenance for all of Hawthorne (from David to the Presidio). The work consists of, but is not limited to, demolition and construction of concrete curbs, gutter, cross gutter, sidewalk and curb ramps, associated storm drain modifications, and hot mix asphalt pavement and pavement seal coating. All work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 6, Packet Page 58 Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project would not impact historic resources as project improvements would only occur in the public right-of-way. The project is located in a sensitive archeological area as shown on the General Plan EIR Figure 8. A Cultural Resource Constraints Review dated July 31, 2024 was conducted by archeologist Angie Moniz. The review concluded a qualified archeologist monitor shall be required to monitor all ground disturbing activities during construction. Therefore, there would be no impacts to historic or archeological resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the plans and specifications for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 5 (35c1553) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awards a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Kraemer Engineering Inc, in the amount of $821,249.00;

4. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications; Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 7, Packet Page 59

5. Authorizes staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project; and

6. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to modify contract funding sources within the approved not-to-exceed amount of the contract, including contingency.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 8, Packet Page 60 City of Monterey
Finance Department
Rafaela King, Finance Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - CITYWIDE ROAD REHABILITATION - PHASE 5 (35C1553)

Page 1 ends

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE ROAD REHABILITATION - PHASE 5 (35C1553)
RESPONSE DEADLINE: November 12, 2024 at 2:00 pm
Tuesday, November 12, 2024

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
Kraemer Engineering Inc $821,249.00
McKim Corporation $859,960.50
Monterey Peninsula
Engineering
$882,685.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$918,918.00
The Don Chapin Company $966,668.00
Precision Grade Inc $979,300.00
Granite Rock Company $1,099,322.00
Anderson Pacific
Engineering Construction,
Inc.
$1,127,685.00
Mountain Cascade, Inc. $1,305,394.75
Granite Construction
Company
$1,405,091.00

BID SCHEDULE
Vendor Total
Kraemer Engineering Inc $821,249.00
McKim Corporation $859,960.50
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 9, Packet Page 61

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE ROAD REHABILITATION - PHASE 5 (35C1553)

Page 2 ends

Vendor Total
Monterey Peninsula
Engineering
$882,685.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$918,918.00
The Don Chapin Company $966,668.00
Precision Grade Inc $979,300.00
Granite Rock Company $1,099,322.00
Anderson Pacific
Engineering Construction,
Inc.
$1,127,685.00
Mountain Cascade, Inc. $1,305,394.75
Granite Construction
Company
$1,405,091.00
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 10, Packet Page 62 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
Prepared By: Shannon Leon, Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Award a Contract for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project to Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. in the amount Not-toexceed $210,000. (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) ***NCIP***
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Awarding a Contract for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project (ncp2446) to Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $210,000, for a term that expires on December 31, 2025.

2. Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the agreement with Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc.

3. Allowing the term of the Agreement to be extended for one year when no additional funding is requested.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

On August 22, 2023, the Planning Commission confirmed the proposed project to be consistent with the General Plan, Specific Plans, Area Plans, Master Plans, Coastal Plans, Traffic Calming Plans, and the Move Monterey Multimodal Plan.

On September 13, 2023, the Parks and Recreation Commission found the proposed project to be consistent with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.

This action is consistent with Council’s strategic priority to carefully manage City revenues and expenditures which support the delivery of City services.

This action is also consistent with policy requiring Council approval of agreements exceeding $75,000.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 63 №10/24
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Council approved Resolution 24-180 appropriating $210,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project Account (ncp2446). The City wishes to enter into a contract with Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. under NPPGov Contract #PS21070, utilizing the accepted “piggyback” purchasing process (Monterey City Code 28-14) for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project, for an amount not-toexceed $210,000. The Finance Department approved this piggyback purchase on December 6, 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of the installation of replacement playground at the El Estero Park Center.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project involves the replacement of existing playground equipment.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 64 №10/24
replacement playground equipment will be installed in the same location as the existing playground equipment, which was installed over a filled swimming pool. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on historical or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could elect not to award the agreement; however, this is not recommended. The funding is needed to replace the existing playground equipment at El Estero Park Center.

DISCUSSION:

On November 19, 2024, City Council approved Resolution 24-180 to appropriate funding for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project.

City staff recommends that the City Council approve awarding this contract for the replacement of playground equipment at El Estero Park Center. This is a project that can be implemented quickly and without the need for support from the Engineering Division staff, which has been impacted due to staffing shortages.

The existing playground equipment is beyond its recommended operational life, and the equipment, as well as the playground surface, needs to be replaced. Upgraded play equipment will benefit the El Estero Park Center Preschool program, which operates daily. The area is used by children three to five years of age, and youth camps and programs are offered yearround.

The City is well served with robust and a well-designed system of parks and recreation facilities.

This project is consistent with the goals of the 2016 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and is supported by the Parks and Recreation Commission and Parks and Recreation Department staff. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Goal 3.1 Maintain and Enhance Existing Parks and Facilities states “The City’s primary priority should be to serve community needs through maintenance and enhancement of existing parks and facilities rather than investment in the development of new parks.”

The El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project is a straightforward, “low hanging fruit” project that can be accomplished quickly with great benefit for thousands of children living locally and within our region. This project does not require design or engineering services, which is currently contributing to the backlog of projects. The current timeline to complete this project is the end of March pending approval of the contract and placing the playground equipment order.

The playground equipment will be purchased and installed by Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc., under the National Purchasing Partners Government (NPPGov) contract #PS21070. NPPGov is a national cooperative procurement organization offering publicly solicited contracts to government entities nationwide for products and services at prices that have been assessed to be fair, reasonable and competitive. A cooperative procurement contract, such as NPPGov, is an exception to the City’s competitive procurement requirements pursuant to Monterey City Code section 28-14.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to award a contract to Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project, in the amount not-to-exceed $210,000.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 65 №10/24
KL/sml
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Rafaela King, Finance Director
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Reginald Paulding, P.E., Senior Engineer
Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
Louie Marcuzzo, Park Operations Manager
Shannon Leon, Recreation Manager
Chinyere Ogbonna, NCIP Committee Chair
Dennis Duke, NCIP Committee Vice Chair
Parks and Recreation Commission
Casey Hilbert, Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 66 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE EL ESTERO PARK CENTER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT UPGRADE PROJECT TO ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.

IN THE AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $210,000
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of October 2023, City Council adopted and approved the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) (Resolution 23-122 C.S.);
WHEREAS, El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade was an approved Cut-Off Project recommended by the NCIP Committee and approved by City Council (Resolution 23-122 C.S.);

WHEREAS, on the 19th day of November 2024, the City Council approved Resolution 24-180 appropriating $210,000 from the NCIP Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project Account (ncp2446); WHEREAS, the City evaluated the procurement process utilized by NPPGov and determined it to be an acceptable “piggyback” purchasing option allowing the City to utilize multi-agency contract pricing. The Finance Department approved the “piggyback” request on December 6, 2024;
WHEREAS, the City wishes to enter into a contract with Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. under NPPGov Contract #PS21070, utilizing the accepted “piggyback” purchasing process (Monterey City Code 28-14) for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of the installation of replacement playground at the El Estero Park Center. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project involves the replacement of existing playground equipment.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 5, Packet Page 67 Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The replacement playground equipment will be installed in the same location as the existing playground equipment, which was installed over a filled swimming pool. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on historical or archeological resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Awards a Contract for the El Estero Park Center Playground Equipment Upgrade Project (ncp2446) to Ross Recreation Equipment Company, Inc. in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $210,000, for a term that expires on December 31, 2025.

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the agreement with Ross Recreation Equipment, Inc.

3. Allows the term of the Agreement to be extended for one year when no additional funding is requested.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 6, Packet Page 68 APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 7, Packet Page 69 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24

ADOPTING A ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD A REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS

ASSESSMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT (RHNAOV), AMEND THE MULTIFAMILY OVERLAY

DISTRICT LAND USE REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, REZONE

PROPERTIES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RHNAOV, REZONE 1200 AGUAJITO ROAD, AND AMEND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PROCEDURES THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, on July 16, 2024, the City Council adopted the City’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element for the 2023-2031 8-year planning period in compliance with State law to respond to current and near-term future housing needs in the City of Monterey and to provide a framework for the community’s long-term approach to addressing its housing needs. The Housing Element contains goals, updated information, and strategic directions (policies and implementing actions) that the City is committed to undertaking;
WHEREAS, the State of California Housing and Community Development Department certified the Housing Element on October 4, 2024;
WHEREAS, the adopted Housing Element includes a Housing Action Plan that includes a program of actions to address identified needs, constraints, and fair housing issues; WHEREAS, Housing Action Plan Program 1-B, Multifamily Residential Overlay, prescribes amendments to the Multifamily Residential Overlay District to further facilitate housing development;
WHEREAS, Housing Action Plan Program 1-L directs the City to rezone the former Monterey County Courthouse site at 1200 Aguajito Road to promote redevelopment to multifamily housing at densities deemed affordable to lower income households; WHEREAS, Housing Action Plan Program 2-A directs the City to allow developments by-right pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2(h) and (i) when 20% or more of the residential units are affordable to lower income households for sites identified on previous housing element sites inventories;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission , at a properly noticed public hearing on December 3, 2024, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons, and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning the property;
WHEREAS, based on the CEQA Review Environmental Checklist, accepted by the City Council by resolution on December 3, 2024 and incorporated by reference herein, there are no substantial changes proposed by the Project or under the circumstances in which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that would require major revisions of the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update EIR. The Proposed Project does not require preparation of a new subsequent or Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 70 supplemental EIR due to either (1) the involvement of new significant environmental effects, (2) a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, or (3) new information of substantial importance. No mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible. Applicable mitigation measures from the certified Monterey 2031 General Plan Update EIR are identified and discussed in this Checklist. The Proposed Project is consistent with and within the scope of the Monterey 2031 General Plan EIR.

WHEREAS, on December 3, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing, reviewed and considered the information presented, and took public comment;
NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, Article 2, Section 38-6(C) is amended to insert the following overlay district designator, name, and article below the Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District 16E:

Base
District +
Designator Base District Name Article
RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District 16E SECTION 4: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, section 99.4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 38-99.4. Specific Purposes.

Multifamily Residential Overlay Districts are intended to facilitate the provision of multifamily residential housing development.”
SECTION 5: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, section 99.5 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 38-99.5. Applicability and Zoning Designator.

Multifamily Residential Overlay Districts shall be shown on the zoning map by adding MF to the base district designator. It may be combined in any Commercial (C), Industrial (IR), or Residential Medium Density Multi-Family (R-3) district to the properties shown in Appendix A to the ordinance codified in this article.

1. Multi-family and mixed-use developments are allowed in three Multifamily Residential Overlay districts as follows:
a. MF1: South side of Garden Road area, shown on Appendix A, except that the Multifamily Overlay District shall not be combined with any Visitor Accommodation Facility (VAF) zoning district;
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 71 b. MF2: Pacific Street / Munras Avenue / Cass Street area, shown on Appendix A. The MF2 overlay does not apply to any properties in this area with Residential Single-Family (R-1), Open Space (O), or Visitor Accommodation Facility (VAF) zoning designations; and
c. MF3: Aguajito Road area, shown on Appendix A.

SECTION 6: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, Section 99.6 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 38-99.6. Land Use Regulations and Development Standards.

Multifamily residential housing development and Mixed Use development, new construction, and conversion, shall be permitted consistent with this Section. Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units may also be allowed in Multifamily Residential Overlay Districts pursuant to Section 38-112.6.

A. Land Use Regulations and Development Standards Applying to All MF Districts.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following land use regulations and development standards shall apply to all multifamily residential and mixed-use developments in all Multifamily Residential Overlay Districts.

1. Density. The maximum permitted residential density for the Multifamily Residential Overlay Districts shall be 60 dwelling units per acre. This subsection (A)(1) shall control when there is a conflict with the allowable density permitted by Sec. 38-112.5.

2. Protected Trees. Protected trees existing on the project site at the time of application shall be preserved unless a Tree Removal Permit is issued as set forth in Chapter 37 of the City Code. Replacement tree(s) shall be provided onsite at a 2:1 ratio. Such replacement tree(s) shall be provided in addition to all other landscaping required by this ordinance and shall be installed prior to final occupancy of the proposed development. The replacement tree(s) shall be a minimum 24” box container size at the time of planting. The replacement tree(s) shall consist of any combination of the tree species listed on the City of Monterey Urban Forestry’s online list of trees suitable for Monterey, unless the tree(s) being removed are Monterey Pine, Monterey Cypress, or Coast Live Oak, then the replacement trees shall be of those same species.

3. Bicycle Parking. One secure bicycle parking space or locker is required per dwelling unit. Secure means that the bicycle parking space has a built-in locking or security mechanism that only the intended user can open.

4. Automobile Parking. The minimum parking requirement is 0.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Tandem parking is allowed. Parking may be shared with an off-site parking facility, provided that the off-site facility can continue to accommodate the minimum required parking of all combined uses on and offsite and is located within one half mile of the off-site building entrance that it is intended to serve. If the property owner proposes to satisfy part or all of the minimum parking requirement with shared parking, they shall enter into a Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 72 shared parking agreement with the City of Monterey, on forms approved by the City Attorney’s Office, for the life of the project.

5. Public Improvements. Public improvements including, but not limited to street improvements, stormwater infrastructure, and sidewalk installation shall be required to be constructed in accordance with the City’s standard details along all project frontages.

6. Environmental. All developments shall comply with any applicable mitigation measure as adopted in the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update, Final EIR SCH #2023080034. A completed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting table demonstrating the project’s compliance and applicability with each mitigation measure shall be submitted with any application for development.

B. MF1 Land Use Regulations and Development Standards.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following land use regulations and development standards shall apply to all multifamily residential developments in the South Side of Garden Road Multifamily Residential Overlay District (MF1).

1. Mixed Use: Mixed use shall be prohibited on any single parcel and within a single building.

2. Maximum Building Height: 45’

3. Minimum Yard Setbacks:
i. Front: 20’
ii. Interior side: 20’
iii. Corner side or reverse corner side: 20’
iv. Rear: 20’
v. Highway 68 right-of-way:

1. New Development. Landscape buffers shall be provided at least 100 feet in width from the ultimate planned right-of-way of Highway 68.

2. Converted Structures. Structures converted to residential uses shall be allowed to maintain the existing setback from the Highway 68 right-of-way.

3. Previously Disturbed Land. For the purposes of this
subsection, Previously Disturbed Land shall mean any portion of a property currently occupied by a legally permitted building at the time a development application is submitted. The redevelopment of Previously Disturbed Land shall be allowed to maintain the setback established by the previous building, within the footprint of the previous building, when the following conditions are met:
a. Additional tree plantings are provided within the
Highway 68 setback area at a minimum ratio of one
tree per 200 square feet with appropriate species as
determined by the City’s Urban Forester, or designee.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 73 b. There shall be no new encroachment into the setback
area such as but not limited to stormwater detention,
retaining structures or parking.
c. This provision shall not apply to previously developed parking areas. Existing parking areas shall be removed
as part of the site conversion.

4. Lot Coverage Maximum: 50%

5. Floor Area Maximum: None

6. Open Space Requirements:
i. Private Open Space. Developments shall provide private open space in the form of private balconies, decks, or patios.

1. Private open space shall be provided at a ratio of 50 square feet of open space for every one dwelling unit. The total required amount of private open space can be flexibly
distributed amongst the units, however, a minimum of 24 square feet of private open space shall be provided for every unit.
ii. Shared Open Space. Developments shall provide shared open space in the form of patios, terraces, courtyards, plazas, rooftop decks, lawns and gardens with pathways, children’s play areas, picnic and barbeque areas, swimming pools and hot tubs, or outdoor sports equipment and facilities. Outdoor shared open space may be located within required yard setback areas. Outdoor open space shall only be constructed with a permeable surface to allow groundwater to recharge. It is not the intent to prohibit a use where its impermeability is inherent. Shared open space shall be accessible to all residents, shall include seating and pedestrian-level lighting, shall be designed so that a horizontal rectangle inscribed within it has no dimension less than 10 feet, and shall not include driveways or parking areas.

1. Developments shall have a minimum total shared open space requirement of 200 square feet per dwelling unit.

7. Materials: The following exterior cladding materials are prohibited:
i. Metal or vinyl plank siding
ii. Faux rock or stone panels. Manufactured masonry/cementitious products shall be allowed when installed as individual components (e.g. manufactured stone block, bricks, etc.)
iii. Unfinished or corrugated metal products
iv. Exposed or unfinished Concrete Masonry Unit block
v. Rough textured stucco

8. Landscaping:
i. A minimum of 50 percent of the front, side, and rear setback area shall be landscaped. Existing protected trees as set forth in Chapter 37 of the City Code shall be counted toward this requirement when such trees are not removed for the development.
ii. Plantings shall be of species listed on the City of Monterey Urban Forestry’s online list of trees suitable for Monterey and shall be a minimum 15-gallon size.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 74

9. Screening:
i. Surface parking lots shall be screened from view of the street with landscaping or a wall with a minimum three-foot height to screen the parking lot when not already screened by a primary building. When located in a street-facing setback, screening may not exceed a height of three feet.
ii. Mechanical equipment shall be screened as follows:

1. Ground mounted mechanical equipment, including water storage systems, shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:
a. Landscaping or vegetative screening.
b. Walls and fences in accordance with all other
provisions in this chapter.
c. Equipment enclosures in accordance with all other
provisions of this chapter when utilizing the same
materials and architectural style of the primary building.

2. Roof mounted equipment, including water storage systems, shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:
a. Building parapets not exceeding 4 feet in height.
b. Landscaping or vegetative screening.
c. Equipment enclosures or penthouses in accordance
with all other provisions of this chapter when utilizing the same materials and architectural style of the
primary building.
iii. Waste enclosures shall comply with the standards established by City of Monterey Resolution No. 05-001, as may be amended or superseded, and shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:

1. Landscaping or vegetative screening.

2. Walls and fences in accordance with all other provisions in this chapter.

3. Equipment enclosures in accordance with all other provisions of this chapter that utilize the same materials and architectural style of the primary building.

10. Lighting: All light sources shall be directed downward and focused on the subject so that no light spillage results. Prevent glare by using shielded and focused light sources; conceal all light sources from adjoining properties; use energy efficient light sources; use light sources that provide a quality of light similar to daylight; avoid “uplighting” of entire building faces, or outlining the frame of a building; and shield light sources with simple shade devices that are consistent with the building design. Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, an exterior lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Airport Manager. All exterior lighting shall be unobtrusive, downlit, harmonious with the local area, and constructed or located so that only the intended area is illuminated and off-site glare is Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 75 fully controlled. The project shall comply with applicable Federal Aviation Administration height and obstruction standards.

11. Noise: All parcels in the development shall have a recorded deed restriction, notifying owners, and requiring owners to notify occupants, that the property is near an airport, which generates noise. The project shall conform to current noise insulation standards pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Chapter 1, Subchapter 1, as may be amended or superseded.

12. Avigation and Hazard Easement: Prior to final of each construction permit associated with the project, the developer/owner shall grant an avigation and hazard easement to the appropriate airport authority. The easement shall be recorded at the Monterey County Recorder’s Office. The easement may include: right of flight at any altitude above the acquired easement surfaces; right to cause noise, vibrations, fumes, dust and fuel particle emissions; right to prevent construction or growth of all structures, objects or natural growth above the acquired easement surfaces; right of entry to remove, mark or light any structures or growth above the acquired easement surfaces, or right to require the owner to remove, mark or light; right to prohibit creation of electrical interference, unusual light sources and other hazards to aircraft flight; and any other limitation the appropriate airport authority may recommend to protect the public’s health, safety and welfare.

C. MF2 Land Use Regulations and Development Standards.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following land use regulations and development standards shall apply to all multifamily residential and mixed-use developments in the Pacific/ Munras/ Cass Multifamily Residential Overlay District (MF2).

1. Mixed Use: Mixed Use Developments are allowed when a minimum of 50% of floor area is dedicated to residential uses.

2. Maximum Building Height: 45’

3. Minimum Yard Setbacks:
i. Front: 10’
ii. Interior side: 5’
iii. Corner side or reverse corner side: 7’
iv. Rear: 10’

4. Lot Coverage Maximum: None

5. Floor Area Maximum: None

6. Floor Area Minimum: 50% of total habitable floor area shall be residential

7. Open Space Requirements: None

8. Materials: The following exterior cladding materials shall be prohibited:
i. Metal or vinyl plank siding
ii. Faux rock or stone panels. Manufactured masonry/cementitious products shall be allowed when installed as individual components (e.g. manufactured stone block, bricks, etc.)
iii. Unfinished or corrugated metal products
iv. Exposed or unfinished CMU block
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 7, Packet Page 76 v. Rough textured stucco

9. Landscaping:
i. A minimum of 50 percent of the front setback area shall be landscaped. Existing protected trees as set forth in Chapter 37 of the City Code shall be counted toward this requirement when being retained.
ii. Plantings shall be of species listed on the City of Monterey Urban Forestry’s online list of trees suitable for Monterey and shall be a minimum 15-gallon size.

10. Screening:
i. Surface parking lots shall be screened from view of the street with landscaping or a wall with a minimum three-foot height to screen the parking lot when not already screened by a primary building. When located in a street-facing setback, screening may not exceed a height of three feet.
ii. Mechanical equipment shall be screened as follows:

1. Ground mounted mechanical equipment, including water storage systems, shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:
a. Landscaping or vegetative screening.
b. Walls and fences in accordance with all other
provisions in this chapter.
c. Equipment enclosures in accordance with all other
provisions of this chapter when utilizing the same
materials and architectural style of the primary building.

2. Roof mounted equipment, including water storage systems, shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:
a. Building parapets not exceeding 4 feet in height.
b. Landscaping or vegetative screening.
c. Equipment enclosures or penthouses in accordance
with all other provisions of this chapter when utilizing the same materials and architectural style of the
primary building.
iii. Waste enclosures shall comply with the standards established by City of Monterey Resolution No. 05-001, as may be amended or superseded, and shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:

1. Landscaping or vegetative screening.

2. Walls and fences in accordance with all other provisions in this Chapter.

3. Equipment enclosures in accordance with all other provisions of this chapter that utilize the same materials and architectural style of the primary building.

11. Lighting: All light sources shall be directed downward and focused on the subject so that no light spillage results. Prevent glare by using shielded and focused light sources; conceal all light sources from adjoining properties; use Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 8, Packet Page 77 energy efficient light sources; use light sources that provide a quality of light similar to daylight; avoid “uplighting” of entire building faces, or outlining the frame of a building; and shield light sources with simple shade devices that are consistent with the building design.

D. MF3 Land Use Regulations and Development Standards.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following land use regulations and development standards shall apply to all multifamily residential developments in the Aguajito Road Multifamily Residential Overlay District (MF3).

1. Mixed Use: Mixed use shall be prohibited on any single parcel and within a single building.

2. Maximum Building Height: 45’

3. Minimum Yard Setbacks:
i. Front: 30’
ii. Side: 30’
iii. Rear: 30’
iv. Highway 1 right-of-way:

A. New Development. Landscape buffers shall be provided at least 100 feet in width from the ultimate planned right-of-way of Highway 1.

B. Converted Structures. Structures converted to residential uses shall be allowed to maintain the existing setback from the Highway 68 right-of-way.

C. Previously Disturbed Land. For the purposes of this
subsection, Previously Disturbed Land shall mean any portion of a property currently occupied by a legally permitted building at the time a development application is submitted. The redevelopment of Previously Disturbed Land shall be allowed to maintain the setback established by the previous building, within the footprint of the previous building, when the following conditions are met:
a. Additional tree plantings are provided within the
Highway 68 setback area at a minimum ratio of one
tree per 200 square feet with appropriate species as
determined by the City’s Urban Forester, or designee.
b. There shall be no new encroachment into the setback
area such as but not limited to stormwater detention,
retaining structures, or parking.
c. This provision shall not apply to previously developed parking areas. Existing parking areas shall be
removed as part of the site conversion.
v. Southern Property line (Adjacent to Navy Property): 50’

4. Lot Coverage Maximum: 50%

5. Floor Area Maximum: None

6. Open Space Requirements:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 9, Packet Page 78 i. Private Open Space. Developments shall provide private open space in the form of private balconies, decks, or patios.

1. Developments open space shall be provided at a ratio of 50 square feet of open space for every one dwelling unit. The total required amount of private open space can be flexibly distributed amongst the units, however, a minimum of 24 square feet of private open space shall be provided for every unit.
ii. Shared Open Space. Developments shall provide shared open space in the form of patios, terraces, courtyards, plazas, rooftop decks, lawns and gardens with pathways, children’s play areas, picnic and barbeque areas, swimming pools and hot tubs, or outdoor sports equipment and facilities. Outdoor shared open space may be located within required yard setback areas. Outdoor open space shall only be constructed with a permeable surface to allow groundwater to recharge. It is not the intent to prohibit a use where its impermeability is inherent. Shared open space shall be accessible to all residents, shall include seating and pedestrian-level lighting, shall be designed so that a horizontal rectangle inscribed within it has no dimension less than 10 feet, and shall not include driveways or parking areas.

1. Developments shall have a minimum total shared open space requirement of 200 square feet per dwelling unit.

7. Materials: The following exterior cladding materials shall be prohibited:
i. Metal or vinyl plank siding
ii. Faux rock or stone panels. Manufactured masonry/cementitious products shall be allowed when installed as individual components (e.g. manufactured stone block, bricks, etc.)
iii. Unfinished or corrugated metal products
iv. Exposed or unfinished Concrete Masonry Unit block
v. Rough textured stucco

8. Landscaping:
i. A minimum of 50 percent of the front, side, and rear setback area shall be landscaped. Existing protected trees as set forth in Chapter 37 of the City Code shall be counted toward this requirement when being retained.
ii. Plantings shall be of species listed on the City of Monterey Urban Forestry’s online list of trees suitable for Monterey and shall be a minimum 15-gallon size.
iii. No landscaping exceeding 8-inches in height shall be planted within 15-feet of the southern most property line (adjacent to Navy property).

9. Screening:
i. Surface parking lots shall be screened from view of the street with landscaping or a wall with a minimum three-foot height to screen the parking lot when not already screened by a primary building. When located in a street-facing setback, screening may not exceed a height of three feet.
ii. Mechanical equipment shall be screened as follows:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 10, Packet Page 79

1. Ground mounted mechanical equipment, including water storage systems, shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:
a. Landscaping or vegetative screening.
b. Walls and fences in accordance with all other
provisions in this Chapter.
c. Equipment enclosures in accordance with all other
provisions of this chapter when utilizing the same
materials and architectural style of the primary building.

2. Roof mounted equipment, including water storage systems, shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:
a. Building parapets not exceeding 4 feet in height.
b. Landscaping or vegetative screening.
c. Equipment enclosures or penthouses in accordance
with all other provisions of this chapter when utilizing the same materials and architectural style of the
primary building.
iii. Waste enclosures shall comply with the standards established by City of Monterey Resolution No. 05-001, as may be amended or superseded, and shall be screened from any public right of way or adjacent property using one of the following methods:

1. Landscaping or vegetative screening.

2. Walls and fences in accordance with all other provisions in this chapter.

3. Equipment enclosures in accordance with all other provisions of this chapter that utilize the same materials and architectural style of the primary building.

10. Lighting: All light sources shall be directed downward and focused on the subject so that no light spillage results. Prevent glare by using shielded and focused light sources; conceal all light sources from adjoining properties; use energy efficient light sources; use light sources that provide a quality of light similar to daylight; avoid “uplighting” of entire building faces, or outlining the frame of a building; and shield light sources with simple shade devices that are consistent with the building design.”

11. Any development application for a property within the MF3 Multifamily Overlay shall be submitted with proof of notification and coordination with the appropriate Planning staff for the United States Navy.

SECTION 7: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, section 99.7 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 38-99.7. Review Procedures.

A. Administrative Approval. Developments meeting the following criteria shall qualify for the Administrative Approval Process as provided in Article 25, section 38-189.B of the City Code:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 11, Packet Page 80

1. At least 20 percent of all residential units with the proposed development project are provided at affordability levels for Low and Very Low income households in accordance with Government Code 65583.2(h) and (i).

2. The proposed development project is found to be in compliance with the explicit standards for development applicable to the subject site.

B. Applications that do not meet the requirements of Sec. 38-99.7.A for Administrative Approval shall follow the review procedure as prescribed elsewhere in the City Code as applicable.

SECTION 8: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, Article 16E, Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District, is hereby added to read as follows:
“Sec. 38-99.9. Specific Purposes.

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District is intended to facilitate the provision of multifamily residential uses while promoting infill development on non-vacant commercial sites previously identified on housing inventories in the City’s Fourth and Fifth Housing Elements.”
38-99.10. Applicability and Zoning Designator.

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District shall be shown on the zoning map by adding RHNAOV to the base district designator. It may be combined with any base zoning district to the properties shown in Appendix A to City Code section 38-99.5.

SECTION 9: The property at 1200 Aguajito Road is hereby rezoned from R-1-15-D1 to R-3-MF3, as shown in Appendix A to City Code section 38-99.5..

SECTION 10: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38, Article 25, section 189 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 38-189. Review Procedures.

A. Minor and Major Architectural Review. The Architectural Review Committee shall adopt and maintain a list of project types that are eligible for either minor or major architectural review. Minor and major architectural review shall be conducted as follows:

1. Major architectural review shall be conducted by the Architectural Review Committee at a public meeting.

2. Minor architectural review shall be conducted administratively by the City Manager or designee. The following process shall apply to administrative reviews as identified in this section:
a. Pre-Decision Referral. City staff shall refer any project to the Architectural Review Committee for consideration prior to administrative decision at their discretion or at the request of any interested party.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 12, Packet Page 81 b. Post-Decision Referral. Except as specified in Section 38-189(B), if specifically requested by any interested party within 10 days of an administrative decision, a project shall be referred to and considered by the Architectural Review Committee.. The Architectural Review Committee’s review shall not be considered an appeal. Rather, it is a formal referral and standard findings for decision shall apply. c. Exception. This subsection (A)(2) does not apply to qualifying housing projects subject to administrative review under Section 38-189(B).

B. Administrative Approval. Architectural Review for qualifying housing developments in the Multifamily Overlay District and Reginal Housing Needs Assessment Overlay District shall be conducted administratively by the Community Development Director or designee. The following process shall apply to administrative review of housing projects:

1. The Community Development Director or designee may deny or approve an application with conditions of approval which are either standard or required to bring the project into compliance with the applicable objective standards.

Prior to issuance of a building permit, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to record a covenant in a form prescribed by the City Attorney, which shall run with the land and provide for the affordable housing requirements and a prohibition against renting the property for fewer than 30 consecutive calendar days. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be filed with the Building Division prior to issuance of the building permit.

2. The Community Development Director’s decision on a ministerial application for qualified housing developments under this Section is final and not appealable.

C. Multiple Entitlements. When a project requires architectural review and a use permit, variance, or other review or approval from the Planning Commission, a joint meeting of the Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission may be convened at the discretion of the Community Development Director or designee. The purpose of these joint meetings is to foster discussion about the project as a whole, and help both boards make more informed decisions. In the course of these joint meetings, requested entitlements shall be considered individually by the Planning Commission or the Architectural Review Committee, as appropriate, and separate actions, findings, and conditions of approval shall be made and assigned for each considered entitlement. The Planning Commission shall take all actions prior to the Architectural Review Committee.

D. Noticing Requirements. When an application for architectural review includes construction of a new building, an increase in height, or addition of floor area, written notices shall be sent by U.S. Mail at least 10 days prior to the public meeting or administrative decision to all owners of property located within 100 feet of the perimeter of the project site. In addition, story poles and netting shall be installed at least 10 days before the public meeting or administrative decision for the following project types:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 13, Packet Page 82

1. Construction greater than one story;

2. Projects that involve an increase in building height; or

3. If safety concerns or other issues preclude installation of story poles and netting, alternative means of illustrating a project may be used at the discretion of the City Manager or designee. Said concerns or issues shall be clearly identified and the alternative means provided in the written notice.” SECTION 10: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 11: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 14, Packet Page 83 APN Address Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
13322004000 SHORELINE COMMUNITY CHURCH I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312015000 REDWOOD GULCH LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322006000 READE PROPERTIES I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322013000 2600 GARDEN ROAD LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312009000

PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
ENTERPRISES LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1
13351001000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312010000

HAUSWIRTH ROBERT A & SHARON
A TRS I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1
13351003000 MURPHY AVENUE LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312008000 2000 GARDEN ROAD LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13351004000 CITY OF MONTEREY I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322014000 2600 GARDEN ROAD LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312007000 GARDEN ROAD INVEST L L C I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322010000 POLARIS CAPITAL VENTURES LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13351002000 SGSK LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322008000 2400 GARDEN ROAD LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322011000

SHORELINE COMMUNITY CHURCH
OF THE MTRY PENINSULA I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352021000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352040000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352022000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352041000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352029000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352048000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352033000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352052000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352010000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352013000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352003000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13322012000

SHORELINE COMMUNITY CHURCH
OF THE MTRY PENINSULA I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352049000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352030000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352016000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352044000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352025000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352005000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352019000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352038000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352039000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352020000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 MF1 Multifamily Residential Overlay
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 15, Packet Page 84 13352004000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312016000 REDWOOD GULCH LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352053000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352001000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352009000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352034000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352043000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352024000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312017000 REDWOOD GULCH LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352017000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352007000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352036000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352023000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352042000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352050000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352012000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352031000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352002000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352015000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352051000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352011000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352032000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352035000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352054000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352008000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352047000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352028000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352026000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352045000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352037000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352018000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352006000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352027000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13352046000 60 GARDEN COURT LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312014000

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR
MONTEREY COUNTY THE ET AL I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312013000

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR
MONTEREY COUNTY THE I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1
13313005000 LINCOLN AVENUE INVESTORS LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312012000

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR
MONTEREY COUNTY THE I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1
13313007000 DOST FRANK M & LAURA MARIE TRS I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13313006000 RUHNKE HENRY PETER JR I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13313003000 TOP FLOOR INVESTORS LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 16, Packet Page 85 13313004000 TOP FLOOR INVESTORS LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312006000 TONKIN H JAMES TR ET AL I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 13312004000 2300 GARDEN LLC I-R-130-RA-ES-MF I-R-130-RA-ES-MF1 Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 17, Packet Page 86 APN Address Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
1603041000 7 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1611004000 1001 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592009000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603047000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681037000 600 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2-RHNAOV
1733001000 512 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1591050000 800 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731015000 498 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1603034000 950 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671034000 1015 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731019000 865 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1671026000 1011 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603032000 980 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603042000 966 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603017000 920 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681050000 800 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1591051000 DORMODY CT CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601013000 901 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672019000 120 CARMELITO AVE CO-D2 CO-D2-MF2
1601028000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731023000 889 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1681057000 155 SARGENT ST 173 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672007000 193 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681047000 693 CASS ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1601018000 977 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601019000 925 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601002000 889 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672008000 173 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681015000 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681034000 CASS ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1672011000 147 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671032000 1035 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681014000 124 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681030000 186 SARGENT ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606009000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731004000 883 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1672010000 153 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671028000 993 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731014000 400 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1672012000 141 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1732010000 518 PERRY ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1681058000 871 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
MF2 Multifamily Residential Overlay / RHNAOV
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 18, Packet Page 87 1681040000 824 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1671023000 1077 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671003000 1045 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681048000 862 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1681005000 148 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1591043000 40 DORMODY CT CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1733002000 520 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1603020000 4 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681042000 800 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1671031000 159 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731028000 910 MAJOR SHERMAN LN C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1601009000 971 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681019000 174 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1733004000 536 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1733007000 580 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1591029000 286 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603021000 2 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682002000 870 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1733006000 560 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1603002000 1062 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1591059000 262 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601015000 877 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681003000 167 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682012000 780 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1603037000 1030 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671030000 175 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1733003000 524 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1681008000 118 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1591042000 276 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671027000 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603023000 3 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672022000 150 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681002000 182 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1612011000 1110 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1732009000 590 PERRY ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1682009000 724 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2-RHNAOV
1591054000 880 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601010000 966 CARMELO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682021000 787 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1733008000 590 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1682022000 300 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2-RHNAOV
1603024000 261 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681055000 829 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681036000 601 CASS ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 19, Packet Page 88 1601020000 917 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681043000 801 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671015000 1000 MUNRAS AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603025000 243 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681012000 856 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1603038000 275 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1733005000 552 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1591041000 266 ELDORADO ST 270 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681035000 635 CASS ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1672015000 121 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672023000 158 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681007000 126 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681006000 136 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681004000 154 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681031000 176 SARGENT ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671038000 143 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672014000 127 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671008000 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672025000 174 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603007000 917 CARMELO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672032000 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672002000 947 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672001000 190 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672031000 142 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672020000 126 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672033000 929 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681029000 194 SARGENT ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671037000 151 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671014000 117 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681017000 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681016000 150 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672018000 942 MUNRAS AVE CO-D2 CO-D2-MF2
1681027000 183 SARGENT ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682001000 880 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1603029000 1088 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1611006000 1001 PACIFIC ST O O-MF2
1681013000 850 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1672030000 132 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1591061000 799 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672034000 167 ELDORADO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1591046000 769 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682011000 780 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1601006000 853 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606007000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 20, Packet Page 89 1601022000 869 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671019000 1036 MUNRAS AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592003000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606001000 900 CASS ST 101 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606004000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592005000 757 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681028000 191 SARGENT ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601014000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603008000 1046 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672026000 915 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672005000 925 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604004000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 4 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601026000 965 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605002000 1010 CASS ST B1 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672027000 903 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592002000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603030000 1084 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605012000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605005000 1010 CASS ST B2 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592006000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592008000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605008000 1010 CASS ST D1 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601016000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682016000 836 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1606005000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606002000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605009000 1010 CASS ST D2 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606003000 900 CASS ST 1C CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606006000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605014000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605016000 1010 CASS ST A4 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605015000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603006000 1033 CARMELO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592004000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605013000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605010000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601027000 969 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604009000 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603004000 1058 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1601021000 859 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603005000 1052 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603019000 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1731027000 900 MAJOR SHERMAN LN C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1592007000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 21, Packet Page 90 1604010000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 10 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604012000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 12 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605007000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605004000 1010 CASS ST B1 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605011000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681018000 111 DAVIS LN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604002000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 2 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1605006000 1010 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682020000 834 ABREGO ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1605003000 1010 CASS ST A3 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604011000 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604007000 VIA JOAQUIN CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604015000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 16 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604014000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 15 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681049000 DAVIS LN C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1605001000 1010 CASS ST A1 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1606008000 900 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604005000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 5 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604013000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 14 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604001000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 1 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604006000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 6 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604003000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 3 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1604008000 7 VIA JOAQUIN 8 CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681053000 833 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1672024000 166 CARMELITO AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1671017000 1012 MUNRAS AVE CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681032000 166 SARGENT ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1603003000 1035 CARMELO ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681056000 888 MUNRAS AVE C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2
1681054000 835 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681052000 831 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1592001000 PACIFIC ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1681051000 829 CASS ST CO-ES CO-ES-MF2
1682023000 398 FREMONT ST C-2-ES C-2-ES-MF2-RHNAOV
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 22, Packet Page 91 APN Address Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
1781013000 1200 AGUAJITO ROAD R-1-15-D1 R-1-15-D1-MF3
MF3 Multifamily Residential Overlay
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 23, Packet Page 92 APN Address Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
1692004000 445 TYLER ST PC-D-ES PC-D-ES-RHNAOV
1073004000 755 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PC-LH PC-LH-RHNAOV
1021005000 600 CANNERY ROW CR CR-RHNAOV
Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay
Appendix A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 24, Packet Page 93 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24
AMENDING MONTEREY CITY CODE CHAPTER 38, SECTION 38-112.5 DENSITY BONUS

TO COMPLY WITH STATE HOUSING LAW AND TO ESTABLISH LOCAL DENSITY

INCENTIVES FOR QUALIFYING HOUSING PROJECTS
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, Section 65915 et seq. of the California Government Code, known as State Density Bonus Law, requires a city to provide a developer that proposes a housing development in that city containing affordable and other types of housing with a density bonus and other incentives;
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 65915(a) requires that all jurisdictions within the state adopt an ordinance that specifies how compliance with State Density Bonus Law will be implemented;
WHEREAS, the City's Housing Element, which was adopted July 16, 2024 and subsequently found in compliance with housing element law on October 4, 2024 by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, provides that the City will update its density bonus ordinance to incorporate new requirements under State Density Bonus Law and to enact a local development bonus program that offers additional incentives for projects meeting certain local objectives;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a properly noticed public hearing on December 3, 2024, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons, and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance; WHEREAS, based on the CEQA Review Environmental Checklist, accepted by the City Council by resolution on December 3, 2024 and incorporated by reference herein, there are no substantial changes proposed by the Project or under the circumstances in which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that would require major revisions of the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update EIR. The Proposed Project does not require preparation of a new subsequent or supplemental EIR due to either (1) the involvement of new significant environmental effects, (2) a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, or (3) new information of substantial importance. No mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible. Applicable mitigation measures from the certified Monterey 2031 General Plan Update EIR are identified and discussed in this Checklist. The Proposed Project is consistent with and within the scope of the Monterey 2031 General Plan EIR;
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing, reviewed and considered the information presented, and took public comment;
NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 94 SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: Section 112.5 of Chapter 38 of the City Code is repealed and replaced to read as shown in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of the Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid and unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 5: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 95 1 EXHIBIT “A”
Section 38-112.5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS
A. Purpose.

In accordance with California Government Code section 65915, et seq. (State Density Bonus Law), this section specifies how compliance with State Density Bonus Law will be implemented.

Specifically, the purpose of this section is to provide density bonuses, incentives, concessions, and waivers of development standards for the production of housing for very low-, low-, and moderateincome households, senior households, provision of daycare facilities, student housing, and donations of land, and for other housing types as provided by state law. In enacting this section, it is also the intent of the City to implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's Housing Element of the General Plan.

B. Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in Section 38-11, the definitions found in State Density Bonus Law shall apply to the terms contained in this section and shall control where there is a conflict with the definitions in Section 38-11. “Incentives” include “concessions” as defined in State Density Bonus Law. If the definition of a term found in Section 38-11 conflicts with the definition of the same term found in State Density Bonus Law, then the definition in State Density Bonus Law shall control when applied to this Section.

C. Application Requirements.

1. An applicant for a “housing development” as defined in State Density Bonus Law shall be eligible for a density bonus and other regulatory benefits that are provided by State Density Bonus Law when the applicant seeks and agrees to provide housing as specified in Government Code section 65915(b), (c), (f), (g), (h) and (v), or in Government Code section 65195.5, or successor provisions. The density bonus calculations shall be made in accordance with State Density Bonus Law.

2. The granting of a density bonus, incentive, or concession, pursuant to this section shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment, development code amendment, zone change, other discretionary approval, or the waiver of a City ordinance or provisions of a City ordinance unrelated to development standards.

3. All requests for density bonuses, incentives, parking reductions, and waivers for a housing development shall be filed with and on a form provided by the Community Development Director, or their designee, concurrently with the filing of the planning application for the first discretionary or ministerial permit required for the housing development, whichever permit is earliest. The applicant shall be informed whether the application is complete, consistent with Government Code section 65943.

4. The application shall include the required fee and the following minimum information:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 96 2 (a) For a requested density bonus.
i. Summary table showing the maximum number of dwelling units permitted by the zoning and general plan excluding any density bonus units, proposed affordable units by income level, proposed bonus percentage, number of density bonus units proposed, total number of dwelling units proposed on the site, and resulting density in units per acre. ii. Identification of subparagraph of Government Code section 65915(b)(1) under which the housing development qualifies for a density bonus and reasonable documentation demonstrating that the housing development is eligible for a bonus under that subparagraph.
iii. Where the housing development is seeking an additional bonus, the subparagraph of Government Code section 65915(v)(1) under which the housing development qualifies for an additional density bonus and reasonable documentation demonstrating that the housing development is eligible for the additional bonus under that subparagraph. iv. Where a housing development is seeking a local density bonus under 38- 112.5.(J), identification of which local density bonus incentive the housing development qualifies for and reasonable documentation demonstrating that the housing development is eligible for a bonus under that Section.
v. A tentative map or preliminary site plan, drawn to scale, showing the number and location of all proposed units, designating the location of proposed affordable units and density bonus units.
vi. The zoning and general plan designations and assessor's parcel number(s) of the housing development site.
vii. A description of all dwelling units existing on the site in the five-year period preceding the date of submittal of the application and identification of any units rented in the five-year period; subject to any form of rent control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power; or subject to a recorded covenant ordinance, or law restricting rents to levels affordable to households of lower or very low income.
viii. If dwelling units on the site are currently rented, income and household size of all residents of currently occupied units, if known. If any dwelling units on the site were rented in the five-year period but are not currently rented, the income and household size of residents occupying the dwelling units when the site contained the maximum number of dwelling units, if known.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 97 3 ix. The phasing of the construction of the affordable housing units in relation to the nonrestricted units in the housing development.
x. A marketing plan for the affordable housing units, as well as an explanation of the methods to be used to verify tenant and/or buyer incomes and to maintain affordability of the affordable housing units. For a housing development with 20 dwelling units or more, the density bonus housing plan shall specify a financing mechanism for ongoing administration and monitoring of the affordable housing units. xi. If a density bonus is requested for a land donation, the location of the land to be dedicated, proof of site control, and reasonable documentation that each of the requirements included in Government Code section 65915 (g) can be met.
(b) Requested incentives. Incentives are those defined by State Density Bonus Law.

The number of incentives that may be requested shall be based upon the number the applicant is entitled to pursuant to State Density Bonus Law. The application shall include the following minimum information for each incentive requested, shown on a site plan (if appropriate):
i. The City's usual regulation and the requested regulatory incentive or concession.
ii. Except where mixed-use zoning is proposed as a concession or incentive, reasonable documentation to show that any requested incentive will result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or rents.
iii. If approval of mixed-use zoning is proposed, reasonable documentation that nonresidential land uses will reduce the costs of the housing development, that the nonresidential land uses are compatible with the housing development and the existing or planned development in the area where the proposed housing development will be located, and that mixeduse zoning will provide for affordable housing costs and rents. (c) Requested waivers. For each waiver requested, the applicant shall include, shown on a site plan, and shown for each existing or proposed parcel, the City's required development standard and the requested development standard. (d) Parking reductions. If a housing development is eligible for a density bonus pursuant to State Density Bonus Law, the applicant may request an on-site vehicular parking ratio specified in Government Code section 65915(p). An applicant may request this parking reduction in addition to the incentives and waivers permitted by paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection. The application shall include a table showing parking required by the zoning regulations, parking proposed under State Density Bonus Law, paragraph under Government Code section 65915(p) (or other statute) Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 98 4 under which the project qualifies for the parking reduction, and reasonable documentation that the project is eligible for the requested parking reduction. (e) Density bonus or incentive for a child care facility in a housing development.

The application shall include reasonable documentation that all of the requirements included in Government Code section 65915(h) can be met. (f) Density bonus or incentive for a condominium conversion. The application shall include reasonable documentation that all of the requirements included in Government Code section 65915.5 can be met.

D. Local coastal program consistency.

1. State Density Bonus Law provides that it shall not be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Cal. Public Resources Code § 30000 et seq.), and further provides that the granting of a density bonus or an incentive shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a local coastal plan amendment.

2. For development within the coastal zone, any requested density bonus, incentive, waiver, or parking reduction shall be consistent with all applicable requirements of the certified City's Local Coastal Program, with the exception of density.

E . Application review process.

1. All requests under State Density Bonus Law shall be part of the planning application and shall be applied for, reviewed, and acted upon concurrently with the planning application by the approval body with authority to approve the development, within the timelines prescribed by California Government Code section 65950 et seq. or other statute. Appeals of the planning application in accordance with the requirements of Monterey City Code Chapter 38 , Article 27 shall include all requests under State Density Bonus Law if appeals are authorized for the discretionary or ministerial permit applied for.

2. To ensure that an application for a housing development conforms with the provisions of State Density Bonus Law and the Coastal Act, if applicable, the staff report presented to the decision-making body shall state whether the application conforms to the following requirements of State Density Bonus Law, as applicable:
a. The housing development provides the housing required by State Density Bonus Law to be eligible for a density bonus and any incentives, parking reduction, or waivers requested, including housing required to replace units rented or formerly rented to very low- and low-income households as required by California Government Code section 65915(c)(3).
b. If applicable, the housing development provides the housing required by State Density Bonus law to be eligible for an additional density bonus under Government Code section 65915(v)(1).

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 99 5 c. If an incentive is requested, reasonable documentation has been presented showing that any requested incentive will result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing or costs or rents; except that, if a mixed-use development is requested, the application must instead meet all of the requirements of Government Code section 65915(k)(2).
d. If a waiver is requested, the development standards for which a waiver is requested would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the housing development at the densities or with the incentives permitted. e. The housing development is eligible for any requested parking reductions under Government Code section 65915(p) or other statute.
f. If the density bonus is based all or in part on donation of land, the requirements of Government Code section 65915(g) have been met.
g. If the density bonus or incentive is based all or in part on the inclusion of a child care facility or condominium conversion, the requirements included in Government Code section 65915(h) or 65915.5, as appropriate, have been met. h. If the housing development is in the coastal zone, the requested density bonus and any requested incentive, waiver or parking reduction is consistent with all applicable requirements of the certified Local Coastal Program.

3. The decision-making body will grant an incentive requested by the applicant unless it makes a written finding, based upon substantial evidence, of any of the following:
a. The proposed incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs, as defined in Health and Safety Code section 50052.5; or for affordable rents, as defined in Health and Safety Code section 50053; or
b. The proposed incentive would be contrary to state or federal law; or c. The proposed incentive would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historic Resources, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low- and moderate-income households. For the purpose of this subsection, “specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date that the application for the housing development was deemed complete as defined in Government Code section 65589.5.

4. The decision-making body will grant the waiver of development standards requested by the applicant unless it makes a written finding, based upon substantial evidence, of any of the following:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 100 6 a. The proposed waiver would be contrary to state or federal law; or b. The proposed waiver would have an adverse impact on any real property listed in the California Register of Historic Resources; or
c. The proposed waiver would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low- and moderate-income households. For the purpose of this subsection, “specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date that the application for the housing development was deemed complete as defined in Government Code section 65589.5.

5. If a child care center complies with the requirements of Government Code section 65915(h), the decision-making body may deny a density bonus or incentive that is based on the provision of child care facilities only if it makes a written finding, based on substantial evidence, that the City already has adequate child care facilities.

6. A request for minor modification of an approved density bonus housing plan may be granted by the Community Development Director, or their designee, if the modification substantially complies with the original density bonus housing plan and conditions of approval. Other modifications to the density bonus housing plan shall be processed in the same manner as the original plan.

F. Affordable Housing Benefit agreement.

1. If a density bonus, incentive, parking reduction, or waiver is approved pursuant to this section r, the applicant shall enter into a binding affordable housing agreement or restrictive covenant, as described below, with the City, which sets forth the conditions and guidelines to be met in the implementation of State Density Bonus Law and that ensures compliance with all of the provisions of this section. The agreement will also establish specific compliance standards and remedies available to the City upon failure by the applicant to comply with State Density Bonus Law, this section, or the affordable housing agreement.

2. For rental projects, the applicant shall enter into an affordable housing benefit agreement with the City, running with the land, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to be executed by the City Manager, or their designee. The agreement shall require the continued affordability of all rental units that qualified the applicant for the receipt of the density bonus, incentive, waiver, or parking reduction for a minimum of fifty-five (55) years or a longer period of time if required by the construction or mortgage financing assistance program, mortgage insurance program, or rental subsidy program; shall identify the type, size and location of each affordable unit; shall specify the eligible occupants; shall specify phasing of the affordable units in relation to the market-rate units; shall describe the specific incentives, waivers, parking reduction, and additional density received along with Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 8, Packet Page 101 7 any condition pertaining to them; and shall contain other relevant provisions approved by the City Attorney. Rents for the lower income density bonus units shall be set at an affordable rent as defined in State Density Bonus Law.

3. For for-sale projects, the applicant shall enter into an affordable housing benefit agreement with the City, running with the land, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to be executed by the City Manager, or their designee. The affordable housing benefit agreement shall require that, the initial purchasers of those for-sale units that qualified the applicant for the receipt of the density bonus, incentive, waiver, or parking reduction are persons and families of lower or moderate income, as applicable, or if any for-sale unit is not purchased by an income-qualified household within one-hundred eighty (180) days after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, then the unit(s) must be sold pursuant to a contract that satisfies the requirements of Revenue and Taxation Code section 402.1(a)(10) to a qualified non-profit housing corporation as defined in State Density Bonus Law and that the units are offered at an affordable housing cost, as that cost is defined in Health and Safety Code section 50052.5; and shall contain other relevant provisions approved by the City Attorney.

The City shall enforce an equity sharing agreement consistent with State Density Bonus Law unless it is in conflict with the requirements of another public funding source or law.

The affordable housing benefit agreement shall require the for-sale units remain available to and permanently affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income.

4. Where a density bonus, waiver or parking reduction is provided for a market-rate senior housing development, the applicant shall enter into a restrictive covenant with the City, running with the land, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to be executed by the City Manager, or their designee, to require the housing development to be operated as "housing for older persons" consistent with state and federal fair housing laws.

5. The executed affordable housing benefit agreement shall be recorded against the housing development prior to final or parcel map approval, or, where a map is not being processed, prior to issuance of building permits for the housing development, whichever is earliest.

The affordable housing benefit agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest.

G. Density bonus calculations.

1. In determining the total number of units to be granted, each component of any density calculation, including base density and bonus density, resulting in fractional units shall be separately rounded up to the next whole number.

2. When calculating the number of affordable units needed to qualify for a given density bonus, any fractions of affordable dwelling units shall be rounded up to the next whole number.

3. Except where a housing development is eligible for an additional bonus pursuant to Government Code section 65915(v) or other provision of Density Bonus Law, each housing development is entitled to only one density bonus. If a housing development Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 9, Packet Page 102 8 qualifies for a density bonus under more than one category, the applicant shall identify the category under which the density bonus is requested to be granted.

4. In determining the number of affordable units required to qualify a housing development for a density bonus pursuant to State Density Bonus Law, units added by a density bonus are not included in the calculations. Any on-site units that satisfy the City's inclusionary housing requirements in Sections 8-1.00 et seq. of the City Code and are required to be constructed concurrently with the housing development may qualify the housing development for a density bonus if those units meet the requirements of State Density Bonus Law. Payment of fees in lieu of providing affordable units under the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance (City Code section 8-1.00 et seq.) does not qualify a housing development for a density bonus.

5. The applicant may elect to accept a lesser percentage of density bonus than the housing development is entitled to, or no density bonus, but no reduction will be permitted in the percentages of affordable units required by State Density Bonus law. Regardless of the number of affordable units, no housing development shall be entitled to a density bonus greater than what is authorized under State Density Bonus Law.

6. Nothing in this section requires the provision of direct financial incentives from the City for the housing development, including, but not limited to, the provision of financial subsidies, publicly owned land, fee waivers, or waiver of dedication requirements. The City, at its sole discretion, may choose to provide such direct financial incentives.

H. Development standards.

1. Building permits and final inspections or certificates of occupancy shall be issued concurrently for the market rate units and for any affordable units that qualified the project for a density bonus, incentive, waiver, or parking reduction, so that the affordable units comprise the required percentage of total units.

2. Affordable units shall be comparable in exterior appearance and overall quality of construction to market rate units in the same housing development. Interior finishes and amenities may differ from those provided in the market rate units, but neither the workmanship nor the products may be of substandard or inferior quality as determined by the City.

3. To comply with fair housing laws, the affordable units shall contain the same proportional mix of bedroom sizes as the market-rate units. In mixed-income buildings, the occupants of the affordable units shall have the same access to the common entrances and to the common areas, parking, and amenities of the project as the occupants of the market-rate housing units, and the affordable units shall be located throughout the building and not isolated on one floor or to an area on a specific floor.

I. Density bonus for commercial development.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 10, Packet Page 103 9 A Commercial Development may request and receive a Development Bonus pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 65915.7.

J. Local Density Bonus

1. Lot consolidation. Multifamily housing projects that propose the consolidation of two or more legal parcels to create a single of lot of at least 0.50 acres may obtain a 10% density bonus independent from, and additional to, the provisions of State Density Bonus Law.

2. Two and Three Bedroom Units. Development projects that propose 70% of the total unit count to be two- and three-bedroom units may obtain a 10% density bonus independent from, and additional to, the provisions of State Density Bonus Law. Projects located in the Alvarado District of the Downtown Specific Plan and within the Pacific, Munras, and Cass Multifamily Overlay District (MF2) may receive one (1) additional story in building height to facilitate achieving maximum densities.

3. Moderate-Income Units. Multifamily development projects that provide 40% of the project units for Moderate-Income household may obtain a 10% density bonus independent from, and additional to, the provisions of State Density Bonus Law.

K. Interpretation.

If any portion of this section conflicts with State Density Bonus Law or other applicable state law, state law shall supersede this section. Any ambiguities in this section shall be interpreted to be consistent with State Density Bonus Law. Statutory references in this ordinance to local, state, or federal codes, statutes, or regulations include successor provisions.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 11, Packet Page 104 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Reginald Paulding, PE, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Authorize the Finance Director to Reimburse Funds in the Amount of $220,034.00 from the Neighborhood Improvement Fund to the Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) ***NCIP*** RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the Finance Director to reimburse funds in the amount of $220,034.00 from the Neighborhood Improvement Fund to the Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with Council policy to approve amendments to the adopted budget or authorize fund reimbursements.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

As of October 21, 2024, the NCIP Ending Balance Account (31nunap) balance is $1,516,895.52. Reimbursing $220,034 from this account to the Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund will reduce the NCIP Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to $1,296,861.52. There is sufficient funding available for this recommended action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action, authorizing appropriation of funds is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 105 №10/24
and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action, including ADA accessibility improvements and placement of interpretive panels, will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

No alternatives are recommended.

DISCUSSION:

On October 15, 2019, City Council adopted Resolution 19-166 to approve and fund $158,000 for Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) project nip2027 to improve curb ramps and travel distances at the intersection of Pearl Street and Figueroa Street. On June 29, 2022, City Council approved Resolution 22-083 to increase funding for the project by $118,000 from $158,000 to $276,000.

On March 7, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 23-022 to award a construction contract in the amount of $1,446,085.00 to Precision Grade, Inc. for the Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project, Phase 7 (35C1552). The NCIP project at the intersection of Pearl Street and Figueroa Steet was included in the scope of the larger Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project, Phase 7.

The curb ramp improvements at Pearl Street and Figueroa Street were completed in June 2023.

The contractor was paid for the work funded through Project Account 35c1552. Project Account 35c1552 is funded by the Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund, Measure S (Fund 252). However, this portion of the work should have been funded through NCIP Project Account nip2027. The value of the work completed at Pearl Street and Figueroa Street is $220,034.00.

This action corrects the City’s accounting so that the project is properly funded through the NCIP as intended by the NCIP Committee and City Council.

AR/rp
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project, Phase 7, Figueroa & Pearl Cost Breakdown
e: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Rafaela King, Finance Director
Wendy Davies, Finance Manager
Kyle Olsen, Finance Analyst
Chinyere Ogbonna, NCIP Chair/Spokesperson
Patrick Aldinger, Measure P and S Oversight Committee Chair Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 106 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO REIMBURSE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $220,034 FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE

STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND
WHEREAS, on the 15th day of October 2019, the City Council approved and funded the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) projects including the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection Improvements (nip2027) through Resolution No. 19-166;
WHEREAS, on 29th day of June 2022, the City Council approved increased funding of $118,000 for the Pearl/Figueroa Steet Intersection Improvements (nip2027) from $158,000 to $276,000 through Resolution No. 22-083;
WHEREAS, on the 7th day of March 2023, the City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $1,446,085.00 to Precision Grade, Inc. for the Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project, Phase 7 (35c1552) through Resolution No. 23-022; WHEREAS, the intersection improvements identified in NCIP Project Account nip2027 at Pearl Street and Figueroa Street were completed in June 2023 as part of the Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project, Phase 7;
WHEREAS, the intersection improvements identified in NCIP Project Account nip2027 at Pearl Street and Figueroa Street valued at $220,034.00 were paid for through Project Account 35c1552; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action, authorizing appropriation of funds is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action, including ADA accessibility improvements and placement of interpretive panels, will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 107

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to reimburse funds in the amount of $220,034.00 from the Neighborhood Improvement Fund (Fund 216) to the Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund (Fund 252), as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 108

QUANTITIES
PROJECT: PROJECT ID:

BID ITEM NO.:

ESTIMATED QUANTITY: 1 LS UNIT PRICE: TOTAL:

Bid Item QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
1 1.00 21,190.00 21,190.00 $
2 1.00 1,313.00 1,313.00 $
3 1.00 4,485.00 4,485.00 $
4 1.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 $
5 201.00 106.00 21,306.00 $
6 2,396.00 21.00 50,316.00 $
10 504.00 27.00 13,608.00 $
11 69.00 38.00 2,622.00 $
14 1,974.00 21.00 41,454.00 $
15 1.00 13,100.00 13,100.00 $
16 3.00 7,100.00 21,300.00 $
20 25.00 169.00 4,225.00 $
21 80.00 182.00 14,560.00 $
23 3.00 335.00 1,005.00 $
24 1.00 1,027.00 1,027.00 $
25 1.00 3,553.00 3,553.00 $
26 208.00 10.00 2,080.00 $
27 1.00 1,190.00 1,190.00 $

0.00 $ -
$ 220,034.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL (13% of Bid Item)
Construction Management
CITYWIDE SIDEWALK REPAIR PROJECT, PHASE 7 35C1552
VARIOUS NAME: FIGUEROA & PEARL COST BREAKDOWN
N/A $ 220,034.00

LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
MOBILIZATION (13% of Bid Item)
STORM COMPLIANCE (13% of Bid Item)
TRAFFIC STRIPING (13% of Bid Item)
CONSTRUCTION SURVEY (34% of Bid Item)

CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (LF)

CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SF)

CONCRETE CURB RAMP (SF)

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE (SF)
HOT MIX ASPHALT CONFORM 6" THICK (SF)

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE - EACH

CURB DRAIN INLET - EACH
6" STORM DRAIN (LF)
12" STORM DRAIN (LF)

RESET/RELOCATE SIGNS - EACH
PAVEMENT MARKINGS (25% of Bid Item)
RED CURB (PAINT 2 COATS) (LF)
AS BUIT DRAWINGS (34% of Bid Item)
Totals
S:\800-Pub-Works\815-Measure P\35c1552 SW\CW SW Repair Ph 7\Construction\Project Expenses\Quantity Tracking Sheets\Quantity Tracking Sheets.xlsx

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 109 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Prepared By: Thomas Harty, PE, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with Monterey One Water for Services Related to Collection of the City’s Sewer Collection Fee on the Monterey County Tax Roll to Include FY 2024-25 for Costs Not-to-Exceed $24,355.32 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Monterey One Water for professional services related to collection of the City’s Sewer Collection Fee on the Monterey County Tax Roll to include FY 2024-25 costs not-to-exceed $24,355.32 and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment; Protect and preserve our natural environment by addressing climate change through ecologically responsible and pragmatic solutions; and
Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Section 5473 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code requires the City to annually prepare a written report containing each parcel that receives sewer service from the City with the annual charges for this service. Monterey One Water performs the treatment of wastewater from the Peninsula region and maintains service records for each parcel in its service area, including the City of Monterey. This MOU outlines the responsibilities of each party to meet the Health & Safety Code requirements as well as deliver accurate information to the County Tax Collector for revenue collection.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Monterey One Water’s fee for conducting tasks required by the Health & Safety Code, including the City Sewer Collection Fee on the county tax roll, is $24,355.32 for FY 2024-25. This figure Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 110 №10/24
includes the 0.25% service/processing fee collected by the Tax Collector’s Office and the direct cost legal notices published in a local newspaper, which will be deducted from M1W’s total fee.

This MOU is effective for FY 2024-25 and will be renegotiated for future years.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

No alternatives were considered for this action.

DISCUSSION:

Moving Monterey’s Sewer Collection Fee to the Property Tax Roll On May 7, 2024, the City Council adopted an update to the City Sewer Ordinance, effective June 6, 2024, that allows annual billing to be included on each parcel’s annual tax bill should there not be a majority protest. (Health & Safety Code section 5473; City Code section 30-16 et seq.)
On July 16, 2024, the City Council approved placing billing its Sewer Collection Fee on the annual tax roll from the Monterey County Treasurer/Tax Collector (Resolution No. 24-115.) Annual Report Requirements
The City or its agent must prepare a written annual report containing a description of each parcel of real property receiving such services and facilities and the amount of the charge for each parcel for the year, computed in conformity with the charges prescribed by the fee resolution. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.) The City Clerk provides notice of the filing of the annual report and the date, time, and place of a hearing to consider all objections or protests to the report. (Health & Safety Code sections 5473.1 and 5473.2.) Collaborating with M1W on the Annual Report
At its meeting on November 25, 2024, Monterey One Water’s Board of Directors approved executing an MOU with the City of Monterey for services related to the collection of the City’s Sewer Collection Fee on the Monterey County Tax Roll, which includes preparing elements of the City’s Annual Rate Report. Monterey One Water (M1W), as the wastewater treatment Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 111 №10/24
provider for the City of Monterey and the surrounding region, prepared the City’s Annual Rate Report (“Annual Report”) for the FY2024-25 Tax Roll.

While the City could track and maintain accurate records of its participating parcels separately, M1W already conducts these activities for each of its customers. Entering into this MOU with M1W eliminates the need for City resources to duplicate M1W’s effort.

The MOU clarifies the responsibilities of each party in meeting the State’s Health & Safety Code requirements and delivering data to the Monterey County Treasurer/Tax Collector. The MOU states that M1W would provide data, conduct filed inspections, manage the sewer connections database, and develop a Billing Adjustment Policy. The City would prepare the Annual Sewer Collection Fee Report, publish the notice in the newspaper, file the report with the County Treasurer/Tax Collector, and pay a fee to M1W. The City would also not issue building permits for projects that impact wastewater flows until M1W has issued a permit or waiver for the project.

Next Steps
In order to continue to provide sewer services to its residents in an efficient and cost-effective manner, staff recommends that the City Council approve a Memorandum of Understanding with Monterey One Water for services related to collection of the City’s Sewer Collection Fee on the Monterey County Tax Roll to include FY 2024-25 costs not-to-exceed $24,355.32 and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding.

NR/th
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
e: Mike McCullough, Director of External Affairs, Monterey One Water Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 112 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH MONTEREY ONE WATER FOR SERVICES RELATED TO COLLECTION OF THE CITY’S SEWER COLLECTION FEE ON THE COUNTY TAX ROLL TO INCLUDE FY 2024-25 COSTS
NOT-TO-EXCEED $24,355.32
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey and Monterey One Water together provide wastewater (sewer) services to developed parcels connected to the City sewer system which delivers wastewater to the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant for treatment; WHEREAS, the Monterey City Council approved changes to its billing procedures on July 16, 2024, to collect City Sewer Collection Fees annually on the Monterey County Tax Roll; WHEREAS, Section 5473 et seq. of the Health & Safety Code requires the City to prepare a written report annually to be filed with the City Clerk that contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving sewer services from the City and the amount of the charge for each parcel for the year;
WHEREAS, Monterey One Water manages the billing records for parcels that receive sewer services from the City that are needed for preparation of the Annual Sewer Collection Fee Report;
WHEREAS, Monterey One Water has prepared a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Monterey to provide services that are needed by the City to prepare the Annual Sewer Collection Fee Report;
WHEREAS, the Monterey One Water Board of Directors approved execution of this Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Monterey at its November 25, 2024 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 113

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding on a form approved by the City Attorney for Monterey One Water to provide professional services related to the collection of the City’s Sewer Collection Fee on the Monterey County Tax Roll to include FY 2024-25 costs not-to-exceed $24,355.32.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 114 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrew Miller, Fire Chief
Prepared By: Cheryl Kouretas, Senior Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Award a Contract for the Purchase and Installation of a New Station Alerting System in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13 in the amount of $358,279.77 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution awarding a contract to Honeywell International, Inc. for the purchase and installation of a new station alerting system in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13 in the amount of $358,279.77.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with Council’s strategic priority to carefully manage City revenues and expenditures which support the delivery of City services. This action is also consistent with policy requiring Council approval of agreements exceeding $75,000.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Monterey City Code section 28-15 allows for an exemption from formal bidding requirements in cases where the contract or purchase is capable of being performed through purchasing contracts negotiated by another governmental agency that utilized acceptable bidding procedures (“piggyback” agreements). This acquisition will be purchased from Honeywell International, Inc. by utilizing the NPPgov contract #PS20350. The Finance Director or her designee approved the piggyback request on November 27, 2024.

The pending purchase will total $358,279.77, including installation, sales tax, and delivery.

Funding for this purchase is available in the Information Services Technology Project Fund [30C1603] in the amount of $250,000, which has $4,468,933.59 available as of December 11, 2024, and in the Fire Stations Repairs and Upgrades Funds (CIP2504, CIP2512, and CIP2513) in the amount of $108,279.77. CIP2504 (Fire Station 11) in the amount of $36,093.26, which has $94,467 available as of December 11, 2024, CIP2512 (Fire Station 12) in the amount of $36,093.26, which has $94,466 available as of December 11, 2024, and in CIP2513 (Fire Station 13) in the amount of $36,093.25, which has $94,467 available as of December 11, 2024.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 115 №10/24
For FY25-30, funds will need to be appropriated from the Information Services Fund 710 for the yearly support and maintenance payments of $17,395.56. The estimated lifespan of equipment is 7-10 years.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to award a contract to replace the station alerting systems in Fire Stations 11, 12 and 13. This action is not recommended as the current station alerting systems in the stations are about 14 years old, unable to be repaired and will not be compliant with the upcoming Monterey County dispatching upgrade.

DISCUSSION:

In October 2010, a contract was awarded to ComTech to replace the speaker system/station alerting systems in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13. The systems are now about 14 years old and are no longer able to be repaired. As of 2022, ComTech no longer exists, many of the parts are no longer made and other companies that we have contacted are not familiar enough with the old ComTech system to guarantee their ability to fix the current issues.

The County of Monterey is currently in the process of upgrading their dispatching system from a two-tone paging system to an IP-based paging system. The new system will allow dispatchers to simultaneously dispatch units instead of one by one. This will result in faster dispatching times, which may reduce response times. The City’s current station alerting system is not compatible with the new IP-based paging system.

Other benefits of replacing the current station alerting system include a mobile device app allowing customized alerting options. For example, the Fire Department can specify apparatus assignments for individual bedrooms to reduce excess dispatches. The new system will allow for automated text-to-speech, which will have the computer system speaking for parts of the dispatch, such as the address/location. Having a very clear and consistently dispatched address ensures crews will arrive at the correct location. In addition, the new speakers will project clear sound, so firefighters should not need to ask for clarification due to unclear/not understandable sound.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 116 №10/24
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution awarding a contract to Honeywell International, Inc. for the purchase and installation of a new station alerting system in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13 in the amount of $358,279.77.

AM/ck
Attachments: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 3, Packet Page 117 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION

OF A NEW STATION ALERTING SYSTEM
IN FIRE STATIONS 11, 12, AND 13 IN THE AMOUNT OF $358,279.77 WHEREAS, the City of Monterey wishes to replace the current station alerting systems in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13;
WHEREAS, the City wishes to enter into a contract with Honeywell International, Inc. under the NPPgov contract #PS20350, utilizing the accepted “piggyback” purchasing process (Monterey City Code 28-14) for the purchase and installation of new station alerting systems in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13;
WHEREAS, the City evaluated the procurement process utilized by NPPgov and determined it to be an acceptable “piggyback” purchasing option allowing the City to utilize multi-agency contract pricing. The Finance Department approved the “piggyback” request on November 27, 2024;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey has funds appropriated in FY25 in the Information Services budget and the Public Works CIP budget to pay for the project; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the award of a contract with Honeywell International, Inc. for the purchase and installation of a new station alerting systems in Fire Stations 11, 12, and 13 in the amount of $358,279.77 and authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute any required contract documents.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 4, Packet Page 118 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 5, Packet Page 119 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Andrew Easterling, City Engineer
Lori L. Williamson, Chief Building Official
Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appropriate $325,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to 30 Fisherman’s Wharf Deck Repairs (CIP2514) ***CIP*** (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Finance Director, or their designee, to appropriate $325,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to 30 Fisherman’s Wharf Deck Repairs (CIP2514) (“Project”).

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is also consistent with Council policy to approve budget amendments.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The proposed action will appropriate $325,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to the 30 Fisherman’s Wharf Deck Repair Project (CIP2514). There is sufficient fund balance available to make this appropriation. At the time of this report there is $300,000 available in the CIP account and with this appropriation the total available CIP budget would be $625,000. The initial project construction cost estimate was $300,000. However, staff intends to use contractors from the City’s job order contract programs and the cost proposals total $625,000 for this work. The contractors’ estimates are based on a force account method of payment, where the City will compensate the contractor on a time and materials basis using competitively bid rates.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 120 №10/24
The existing CIP budget totals $300,000 and an additional $325,000 is necessary to initiate the work orders. Because the work will be performed on a time and materials basis, additional funding may be necessary in the future once work is complete and final costs are known.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of repairs and maintenance to Fisherman’s Wharf (30 Fisherman’s Wharf).

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project includes improvements to existing facilities.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Repairs and maintenance under the project would not impact the building at 30 Fisherman’s Wharf. The project is located on Wharf 1; therefore, archeological sensitivity does not apply to this project.

The project would not have an impact on historic or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to fund the deck repairs, but this is not recommended by staff. The City owns the building and structural repairs are needed to prevent further deterioration.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 121 №10/24
DISCUSSION:

Old Fisherman’s Wharf, also known as Wharf 1 (“Wharf 1”), features a main boardwalk, various concession buildings, finger piers, docking and mooring structures, with both City-owned and tenant-owned structures. The vacant building located at 30 Fisherman’s Wharf (Concession 33), came under City ownership in 2021.

The City executes a structural maintenance program to inspect and assess the condition of its two wharves to identify maintenance and repair needs. An inspection and assessment of Wharf 1 was performed in spring 2024. The Wharf 1 inspection and assessment report informed the project engineer’s exploratory review of the site. Ultimately, staff determined that repairs were necessary at 30 Fisherman’s Wharf to provide a structurally sound building to future tenants.

Construction drawings were prepared based on the engineer’s review of the report and field observations to implement the necessary repairs. In general, the repairs include replacing damaged deck boards, floor finishes, sheeting, and installation of structural hardware and framing. On September 17, 2024, City Council approved Resolution No. 24-099 to create a new CIP for this work and appropriate $300,000 of unassigned general fund balance.

The City anticipates construction in early 2025 through the job order contract program (See City Code section 28-9 et seq.). The City has both Municipal (Class A) and Building (Class B) job order contracts available for new construction, repairs, and upgrades to existing infrastructure, and emergency repairs. Job order contracts use unit prices that are competitively bid as a way of potentially expediting a project. Both the Class A and Class B contractors were engaged to initiate work orders. The Class A contractor (The Don Chapin Company, Inc), performing the work to 30 Fisherman’s Wharf, estimated their scope of work would be $475,000 based on force account method. The Class B contractor (Pueblo Construction, Inc.) performing the work to the building estimated their scope of work would be $150,000 based on the force account method.

Because the exact scope and limit of work are unclear, neither contractor can provide a “total cost not to exceed” quote. Staff believes the force account method of compensation is appropriate. However, a full-time City inspector will be required to monitor the contractors during construction.

The City is not responsible for the maintenance of Wharf 1 in its entirety. There are various lease agreements where the tenants are responsible for maintaining their structure and are obligated to provide engineering reports and make any necessary repairs every three years.

The full Wharf 1 Inspection and Assessment will be presented to the City Council during a future meeting.

AR/KC
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Kim Cole, Community Development Director
Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
Lori Williamson, Chief Building Official
Fisherman’s Wharf Association
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 3, Packet Page 122 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION OF $325,000 FROM THE
GENERAL FUND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE TO 30 FISHERMAN’S WHARF DECK REPAIRS (CIP2514) ***CIP***
WHEREAS, the vacant building located at 30 Fisherman’s Wharf came under City ownership in 2021;
WHEREAS, staff determined that repairs were necessary at 30 Fisherman’s Wharf to provide a structurally sound building to future tenants; WHEREAS, construction drawings were prepared based on the engineer’s review of the report and field observations to implement the necessary repairs; WHEREAS, the City anticipates construction through the job order contract programs; WHEREAS, staff’s initial construction cost estimate was $300,000, however the contractors’ estimate totals $625,000 for this work;
WHEREAS, the existing CIP has $300,000 and an additional $325,000 is necessary to initiate the work orders; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of repairs and maintenance to Fisherman’s Wharf (30 Fisherman’s Wharf). Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project includes improvements to existing facilities.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 4, Packet Page 123 Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Repairs and maintenance under the project would not impact the building at 30 Fisherman’s Wharf. The project is located on Wharf I; therefore, archeological sensitivity does not apply to this project.

The project would not have an impact on historic or archeological resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to appropriate $325,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to the 30 Fisherman's Wharf Deck Repairs Project (CIP2514).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 5, Packet Page 124 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Brette Neal, Human Resources Director
Prepared by: Gina Russo, Assistant Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Approve the Amended FY2024/25 Salary Schedule for Regular Full-Time and Regular Part-Time Employees Effective January 1, 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the amended FY2024/25 Salary Schedule for regular full-time and regular part-time employees effective January 1, 2025.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources and provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action meets the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, and Government Code section 20636(b)(1), which require governing bodies of local agencies contracting with CalPERS to adopt a publicly available pay schedule.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Deputy City Attorney and Assistant Library Director positions were approved in the FY 24/25 Position Control List and FY 24/25 Adopted Budget. The difference between the amount in the adopted budget and this current update does not have an effect on the overall budget as both positions have been vacant since the adoption of the budget. Any increase in the amount of salary will be absorbed by the salary savings.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 125 №10/24
this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

No alternatives are recommended.

DISCUSSION:

Local agencies contracting with CalPERS must make available a pay schedule that identifies each position by title, the pay rate amount or ranges for each identified position, and the time based upon which the amounts are established.

The job description for the Deputy City Attorney was modified to reflect that the position is not an entry level position. Assignments involve duties requiring technical or functional expertise and/or performance of specialized duties in a highly independent manner. This position requires the incumbent to consistently and independently handle difficult civil cases which involve complex legal research and interpretation of facts and law. Typical assignments in this class require a high degree of initiative, skill, and specialized legal knowledge. As such, the recommendation to increase the salary is based on a review of our comparable agencies and internal comparable salaries.

The Assistant Library Director classification was added to the FY24/25 budget as an important position to provide oversight and support of the Monterey Public Library operations. This role would also bring additional depth of knowledge to the library. The recommended salary is based on a review of our comparable agencies and internal comparable salaries.

The amended salary schedule includes the proposed salaries for Deputy City Attorney and Assistant Library Director as below:

Deputy City Attorney Semi-Monthly
Step 1: $6,541
Step 2: $6,868
Step 3: $7,212
Step 4: $7,572
Step 5: $7,951
Assistant Library Director Semi-Monthly
Step 1: $5,446
Step 2: $5,718
Step 3: $6,004
Step 4: $6,304
Step 5: $6,619
The Management Employees Association has been consulted and is in concurrence with this salary amendments.

BN/gr
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 126 №10/24
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A: FY 2024/25 Regular Full-time and Regular Part-time Salary Schedule
e: Christine Davi, City Attorney
Rafaela King, Finance Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 127 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
APPROVING THE AMENDED FY2024/25 SALARY SCHEDULE FOR REGULAR FULL-TIME AND REGULAR PART-TIME EMPLOYEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2025 WHEREAS, the Council has previously authorized the establishment of all employee classifications and salaries for regular full-time and regular part-time employees; WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, and Government Code section 20636(b)(1), require governing bodies of local agencies contracting with CalPERS to adopt a publicly available pay schedule; and
WHEREAS, the proposed salary for Deputy City Attorney is as follows:

Semi-Monthly
Step 1: $6,541
Step 2: $6,868
Step 3: $7,212
Step 4: $7,572
Step 5: $7,951; and
WHEREAS, the proposed salary for Assistant Library Director is as follows:

Semi-Monthly
Step 1: $5,446
Step 2: $5,718
Step 3: $6,004
Step 4: $6,304
Step 5: $6,619; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 4, Packet Page 128

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves (ratifies) the FY 2024/25 salary schedule as reflected in Exhibit A effective January 1, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 5, Packet Page 129 City of Monterey
Full-Time Salary Schedule and Regular
Part-Time Hourly Schedule
FY 24/25
Effective: 07-01-24 to 06-30-25
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 6, Packet Page 130 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3310 ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR ft gem Step: 1076 3,887.00 93,288.00 076 3310 ft gem Step: 2076 4,082.00 97,968.00
3310 ft gem Step: 3076 4,288.00 102,912.00
3310 ft gem Step: 4076 4,500.00 108,000.00
3310 ft gem Step: 5076 4,724.00 113,376.00
3313 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1268 2,523.00 60,552.00 268 3313 ft gem Step: 2268 2,649.00 63,576.00
3313 ft gem Step: 3268 2,782.00 66,768.00
3313 ft gem Step: 4268 2,921.00 70,104.00
3313 ft gem Step: 5268 3,069.00 73,656.00
3320 ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1285 3,018.00 72,432.00 285 3320 ft gem Step: 2285 3,167.00 76,008.00
3320 ft gem Step: 3285 3,323.00 79,752.00
3320 ft gem Step: 4285 3,491.00 83,784.00
3320 ft gem Step: 5285 3,666.00 87,984.00
1203 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1015 3,931.00 94,344.00 015 1203 ft mea Step: 2015 4,130.00 99,120.00
1203 ft mea Step: 3015 4,335.00 104,040.00
1203 ft mea Step: 4015 4,552.00 109,248.00
1203 ft mea Step: 5015 4,780.00 114,720.00
3307 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1373 2,288.00 54,912.00 373 3307 ft gem Step: 2373 2,403.00 57,672.00
3307 ft gem Step: 3373 2,523.00 60,552.00
3307 ft gem Step: 4373 2,649.00 63,576.00
3307 ft gem Step: 5373 2,782.00 66,768.00
3307 ft gem Step: 6373 2,921.00 70,104.00
3307 ft gem Step: 7373 3,069.00 73,656.00
6112 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECH ft gem Step: 1731 3,009.00 72,216.00 731 6112 ft gem Step: 2731 3,161.00 75,864.00
6112 ft gem Step: 3731 3,316.00 79,584.00
6112 ft gem Step: 4731 3,483.00 83,592.00
6112 ft gem Step: 5731 3,659.00 87,816.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 1 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 7, Packet Page 131 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5303 AQUATICS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1114 3,348.00 80,352.00 114 5303 pt gem Step: 2114 3,515.00 84,360.00
5303 pt gem Step: 3114 3,692.00 88,608.00
5303 pt gem Step: 4114 3,876.00 93,024.00
5303 pt gem Step: 5114 4,070.00 97,680.00
5301 AQUATICS SPECIALIST II pt gem Step: 1302 2,184.00 52,416.00 302 5301 pt gem Step: 2302 2,292.00 55,008.00
5301 pt gem Step: 3302 2,407.00 57,768.00
5301 pt gem Step: 4302 2,526.00 60,624.00
5301 pt gem Step: 5302 2,652.00 63,648.00
1207 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY pt mea Step: 1200 7,745.00 185,880.00 200 1207 pt mea Step: 2200 8,154.00 195,696.00
1207 pt mea Step: 3200 8,583.00 205,992.00
1207 pt mea Step: 4200 9,035.00 216,840.00
1207 pt mea Step: 5200 9,510.00 228,240.00
1122 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ft exec Step: 5010 10,405.00 249,720.00 010 1264 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1263 6,589.00 158,136.00 263 1264 ft mea Step: 2263 6,919.00 166,056.00
1264 ft mea Step: 3263 7,265.00 174,360.00
1264 ft mea Step: 4263 7,628.00 183,072.00
1264 ft mea Step: 5263 8,011.00 192,264.00
2205 ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF ft fma Step: 1325 8,259.00 198,216.00 325 2205 ft fma Step: 2325 8,667.00 208,008.00
2205 ft fma Step: 3325 9,104.00 218,496.00
2205 ft fma Step: 4325 9,560.00 229,440.00
2205 ft fma Step: 5325 10,036.00 240,864.00
1298 ASSISTANT HR DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1370 6,501.00 156,024.00 370 1298 ft mea Step: 2370 6,827.00 163,848.00
1298 ft mea Step: 3370 7,169.00 172,056.00
1298 ft mea Step: 4370 7,527.00 180,648.00
1298 ft mea Step: 5370 7,904.00 189,696.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 2 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 8, Packet Page 132 1/015
 

















  


  

 
 



"


  
 #
""! 

"! 
  
 #
 ! 


!
  


"! ""

!
  
" 

"! #

!
  
# 

! #
#!
! 



  
 

! "
"! 
!  
 

#! 

!
!  



" ! 
!
!  
" 

#

!  

!
!  
# 


! 


!
 






 
 
 
 ! 


! 
 
 
 
! 
 "!
 
 



"
! 
!
 
 
" 

#! 
"!
 
 
# 

! 

"" !
 



"


  
 

#
!  "
"#! 
  
 


#! 
 !
  



! 

""!
  
" "
"! 

!
  
# "
! 
!
 




  
 "
#! 
"" ! 
  
 #


! 

!
  

#

"
! 

!
  
" #
"! 
"

!
  
# 

! "

"!
 


  
 


! 
#

#! !
  
 "

! 
#!
  

"

! #
 !
  
" "
! 
""!
  
# "

! #

!
) $*+,-./0*.$

&
 

!

!!"
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 9, Packet Page 133 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1290 ASST DIR OF INFO RESOURCES ft mea Step: 1357 6,168.00 148,032.00 357 1290 ft mea Step: 2357 6,477.00 155,448.00
1290 ft mea Step: 3357 6,802.00 163,248.00
1290 ft mea Step: 4357 7,142.00 171,408.00
1290 ft mea Step: 5357 7,499.00 179,976.00
1226 ASST PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1237 4,467.00 107,208.00 237 1226 ft mea Step: 2237 4,689.00 112,536.00
1226 ft mea Step: 3237 4,924.00 118,176.00
1226 ft mea Step: 4237 5,170.00 124,080.00
1226 ft mea Step: 5237 5,429.00 130,296.00
6301 AUTOMOTIVE MECHANIC rpt gem Step: 1132 3,116.00 74,784.00 132 6301 rpt gem Step: 2132 3,270.00 78,480.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 3132 3,439.00 82,536.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 4132 3,607.00 86,568.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 5132 3,789.00 90,936.00
6501 BUILDING MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1135 2,913.00 69,912.00 135 6501 ft gem Step: 2135 3,058.00 73,392.00
6501 ft gem Step: 3135 3,215.00 77,160.00
6501 ft gem Step: 4135 3,369.00 80,856.00
6501 ft gem Step: 5135 3,538.00 84,912.00
6502 BUILDING MAINT. SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1136 3,708.00 88,992.00 136 6502 ft gem Step: 2136 3,895.00 93,480.00
6502 ft gem Step: 3136 4,090.00 98,160.00
6502 ft gem Step: 4136 4,293.00 103,032.00
6502 ft gem Step: 5136 4,508.00 108,192.00
6503 BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1137 2,229.00 53,496.00 137 6503 ft gem Step: 2137 2,340.00 56,160.00
6503 ft gem Step: 3137 2,457.00 58,968.00
6503 ft gem Step: 4137 2,580.00 61,920.00
6503 ft gem Step: 5137 2,709.00 65,016.00
6503 ft gem Step: 6137 2,843.00 68,232.00
6503 ft gem Step: 7137 2,986.00 71,664.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 4 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 10, Packet Page 134 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4306 BUILDING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1196 3,526.00 84,624.00 196 4306 ft gem Step: 2196 3,702.00 88,848.00
4306 ft gem Step: 3196 3,890.00 93,360.00
4306 ft gem Step: 4196 4,083.00 97,992.00
4306 ft gem Step: 5196 4,290.00 102,960.00
3334 BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1247 3,270.00 78,480.00 247 3334 ft gem Step: 2247 3,439.00 82,536.00
3334 ft gem Step: 3247 3,607.00 86,568.00
3334 ft gem Step: 4247 3,789.00 90,936.00
3334 ft gem Step: 5247 3,975.00 95,400.00
6702 CEMETERY COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1157 3,348.00 80,352.00 157 6702 ft gem Step: 2157 3,515.00 84,360.00
6702 ft gem Step: 3157 3,692.00 88,608.00
6702 ft gem Step: 4157 3,876.00 93,024.00
6702 ft gem Step: 5157 4,070.00 97,680.00
6710 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1165 2,584.00 62,016.00 165 6710 ft gem Step: 2165 2,715.00 65,160.00
6710 ft gem Step: 3165 2,852.00 68,448.00
6710 ft gem Step: 4165 2,993.00 71,832.00
6710 ft gem Step: 5165 3,142.00 75,408.00
1300 CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ft mea Step: 1011 7,038.00 168,912.00 011 1300 ft mea Step: 2011 7,390.00 177,360.00
1300 ft mea Step: 3011 7,759.00 186,216.00
1300 ft mea Step: 4011 8,147.00 195,528.00
1300 ft mea Step: 5011 8,554.00 205,296.00
1270 CHIEF OF INSPCT SRVC/BLDG OFF. ft mea Step: 1311 6,579.00 157,896.00 311 1270 ft mea Step: 2311 6,905.00 165,720.00
1270 ft mea Step: 3311 7,255.00 174,120.00
1270 ft mea Step: 4311 7,616.00 182,784.00
1270 ft mea Step: 5311 7,996.00 191,904.00
1104 CITY ATTORNEY pt exec Step: 5002 11,287.00 270,888.00 002 General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 5 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 11, Packet Page 135 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1221 CITY CLERK ft mea Step: 1031 5,087.00 122,088.00 031 1221 ft mea Step: 2031 5,404.00 129,696.00
1221 ft mea Step: 3031 5,723.00 137,352.00
1221 ft mea Step: 4031 6,039.00 144,936.00
1221 ft mea Step: 5031 6,358.00 152,592.00
1101 CITY MANAGER ft exec Step: 5001 12,197.00 292,728.00 001 1254 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER pt mea Step: 1050 6,168.00 148,032.00 050 1254 pt mea Step: 2050 6,477.00 155,448.00
1254 pt mea Step: 3050 6,802.00 163,248.00
1254 pt mea Step: 4050 7,142.00 171,408.00
1254 pt mea Step: 5050 7,499.00 179,976.00
4308 CODE COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1326 3,878.00 93,072.00 326 4308 ft gem Step: 2326 4,073.00 97,752.00
4308 ft gem Step: 3326 4,277.00 102,648.00
4308 ft gem Step: 4326 4,490.00 107,760.00
4308 ft gem Step: 5326 4,716.00 113,184.00
1299 COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1048 4,480.00 107,520.00 048 1299 ft mea Step: 2048 4,704.00 112,896.00
1299 ft mea Step: 3048 4,939.00 118,536.00
1299 ft mea Step: 4048 5,187.00 124,488.00
1299 ft mea Step: 5048 5,447.00 130,728.00
1110 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5006 9,084.00 218,016.00 006 6805 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ft gem Step: 1353 2,747.00 65,928.00 353 6805 ft gem Step: 2353 2,887.00 69,288.00
6805 ft gem Step: 3353 3,031.00 72,744.00
6805 ft gem Step: 4353 3,181.00 76,344.00
6805 ft gem Step: 5353 3,344.00 80,256.00
1266 CONFERENCE CENTER GENERAL MGR ft mea Step: 1303 5,827.00 139,848.00 303 1266 ft mea Step: 2303 6,119.00 146,856.00
1266 ft mea Step: 3303 6,424.00 154,176.00
1266 ft mea Step: 4303 6,748.00 161,952.00
1266 ft mea Step: 5303 7,081.00 169,944.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 6 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 12, Packet Page 136 1/015
 

















  


  

 
 




&
  
 "
#! "
! 
  
 #
 ! 
"
!
  

#
! 

"!
  
" #
#
! 

##!
  
# #
! 

!
 

" & & 
 " !

#
! 
  

  
 

! "
"" ! 
   
 
 ! "

!
   


 ! #

""!
   
" 
! #"

!
   
# 
"! #
 !
 






 
 
#"! #

"! 
  
 
 ! "

!
  


! 

 !
  
" 
#!  
 !
  
# 

#! 

"!
 





  
 #

! 

! !
  
 #
#

! 
"

!
  

#
! "
""!
  
" 

! "
#!
  
# 
"
! ##
"
!
! 


%

  
 
 ! "

! 
!  
 
"! ##
"" !
!  


! 

" !
!  
" 
"! 
" !
!  
# 
"

! 

!
 


%



  
 
#"! #
 ! 
  
 

! "
#!
  


! 

 !
  
" 
#!  
 !
  
# 

#! 

"!
) $*+,-./0*.$

&
 

!

&!"
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 13, Packet Page 137 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1209 DIVISION CHIEF pt fma Step: 1019 7,044.00 169,056.00 019 1209 pt fma Step: 2019 7,397.00 177,528.00
1209 pt fma Step: 3019 7,768.00 186,432.00
1209 pt fma Step: 4019 8,155.00 195,720.00
1209 pt fma Step: 5019 8,563.00 205,512.00
6203 ELECTRICIAN ft gem Step: 1124 3,510.00 84,240.00 124 6203 ft gem Step: 2124 3,685.00 88,440.00
6203 ft gem Step: 3124 3,871.00 92,904.00
6203 ft gem Step: 4124 4,063.00 97,512.00
6203 ft gem Step: 5124 4,266.00 102,384.00
6727 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1343 3,432.00 82,368.00 343 6727 ft gem Step: 2343 3,605.00 86,520.00
6727 ft gem Step: 3343 3,787.00 90,888.00
6727 ft gem Step: 4343 3,974.00 95,376.00
6727 ft gem Step: 5343 4,171.00 100,104.00
6728 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1364 3,880.00 93,120.00 364 6728 ft gem Step: 2364 4,071.00 97,704.00
6728 ft gem Step: 3364 4,282.00 102,768.00
6728 ft gem Step: 4364 4,490.00 107,760.00
6728 ft gem Step: 5364 4,716.00 113,184.00
1297 ENGINEERING PROGRAMS ANALYST ft gem Step: 1040 3,973.00 95,352.00 040 1297 ft gem Step: 2040 4,173.00 100,152.00
1297 ft gem Step: 3040 4,382.00 105,168.00
1297 ft gem Step: 4040 4,601.00 110,424.00
1297 ft gem Step: 5040 4,833.00 115,992.00
1286 ENGINEERING PROJECTS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1344 4,774.00 114,576.00 344 1286 ft mea Step: 2344 5,011.00 120,264.00
1286 ft mea Step: 3344 5,262.00 126,288.00
1286 ft mea Step: 4344 5,523.00 132,552.00
1286 ft mea Step: 5344 5,800.00 139,200.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 8 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 14, Packet Page 138 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4103 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1090 3,117.00 74,808.00 090 4103 ft gem Step: 2090 3,271.00 78,504.00
4103 ft gem Step: 3090 3,436.00 82,464.00
4103 ft gem Step: 4090 3,607.00 86,568.00
4103 ft gem Step: 5090 3,789.00 90,936.00
1276 ENVIRONMENTAL REG ANALYST ft gem Step: 1329 3,973.00 95,352.00 329 1276 ft gem Step: 2329 4,173.00 100,152.00
1276 ft gem Step: 3329 4,382.00 105,168.00
1276 ft gem Step: 4329 4,601.00 110,424.00
1276 ft gem Step: 5329 4,833.00 115,992.00
4108 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS MGR. ft mea Step: 1334 4,655.00 111,720.00 334 4108 ft mea Step: 2334 4,890.00 117,360.00
4108 ft mea Step: 3334 5,128.00 123,072.00
4108 ft mea Step: 4334 5,389.00 129,336.00
4108 ft mea Step: 5334 5,661.00 135,864.00
6517 EVENT & SALES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1086 2,457.00 58,968.00 086 6517 ft gem Step: 2086 2,579.00 61,896.00
6517 ft gem Step: 3086 2,708.00 64,992.00
6517 ft gem Step: 4086 2,844.00 68,256.00
6517 ft gem Step: 5086 2,988.00 71,712.00
6507 EVENT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1140 3,348.00 80,352.00 140 6507 pt gem Step: 2140 3,515.00 84,360.00
6507 pt gem Step: 3140 3,692.00 88,608.00
6507 pt gem Step: 4140 3,876.00 93,024.00
6507 pt gem Step: 5140 4,070.00 97,680.00
6513 EVENT SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1144 3,687.00 88,488.00 144 6513 pt gem Step: 2144 3,872.00 92,928.00
6513 pt gem Step: 3144 4,065.00 97,560.00
6513 pt gem Step: 4144 4,267.00 102,408.00
6513 pt gem Step: 5144 4,481.00 107,544.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 9 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 15, Packet Page 139 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3318 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1288 2,778.00 66,672.00 288 3318 ft gem Step: 2288 2,918.00 70,032.00
3318 ft gem Step: 3288 3,065.00 73,560.00
3318 ft gem Step: 4288 3,218.00 77,232.00
3318 ft gem Step: 5288 3,381.00 81,144.00
3324 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1289 3,113.00 74,712.00 289 3324 ft gem Step: 2289 3,267.00 78,408.00
3324 ft gem Step: 3289 3,433.00 82,392.00
3324 ft gem Step: 4289 3,604.00 86,496.00
3324 ft gem Step: 5289 3,786.00 90,864.00
5209 FACILITIES MAINT. COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1305 3,997.00 95,928.00 305 5209 ft gem Step: 2305 4,197.00 100,728.00
5209 ft gem Step: 3305 4,407.00 105,768.00
5209 ft gem Step: 4305 4,629.00 111,096.00
5209 ft gem Step: 5305 4,862.00 116,688.00
6504 FACILITY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1138 2,536.00 60,864.00 138 6504 pt gem Step: 2138 2,663.00 63,912.00
6504 pt gem Step: 3138 2,798.00 67,152.00
6504 pt gem Step: 4138 2,938.00 70,512.00
6504 pt gem Step: 5138 3,084.00 74,016.00
5205 FACILITY COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1111 3,348.00 80,352.00 111 5205 pt gem Step: 2111 3,515.00 84,360.00
5205 pt gem Step: 3111 3,692.00 88,608.00
5205 pt gem Step: 4111 3,876.00 93,024.00
5205 pt gem Step: 5111 4,070.00 97,680.00
3109 FIELD ASSISTANT pt gem Step: 1172 2,457.00 58,968.00 172 3109 pt gem Step: 2172 2,579.00 61,896.00
3109 pt gem Step: 3172 2,708.00 64,992.00
3109 pt gem Step: 4172 2,844.00 68,256.00
3109 pt gem Step: 5172 2,988.00 71,712.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 10 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 16, Packet Page 140 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1252 FINANCE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1294 3,931.00 94,344.00 294 1252 ft mea Step: 2294 4,130.00 99,120.00
1252 ft mea Step: 3294 4,334.00 104,016.00
1252 ft mea Step: 4294 4,552.00 109,248.00
1252 ft mea Step: 5294 4,780.00 114,720.00
1106 FINANCE DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5004 9,362.00 224,688.00 004 1277 FINANCE MANAGER ft mea Step: 1051 5,605.00 134,520.00 051 1277 ft mea Step: 2051 5,886.00 141,264.00
1277 ft mea Step: 3051 6,181.00 148,344.00
1277 ft mea Step: 4051 6,491.00 155,784.00
1277 ft mea Step: 5051 6,808.00 163,392.00
2201 FIRE CAPTAIN ft mffa Step: 1059 5,078.00 121,872.00 059 2201 ft mffa Step: 2059 5,331.00 127,944.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 3059 5,597.00 134,328.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 4059 5,874.00 140,976.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 5059 6,168.00 148,032.00
1107 FIRE CHIEF ft exec Step: 5005 10,540.00 252,960.00 005 2203 FIRE ENGINEER ft mffa Step: 1060 4,385.00 105,240.00 060 2203 ft mffa Step: 2060 4,603.00 110,472.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 3060 4,835.00 116,040.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 4060 5,078.00 121,872.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 5060 5,331.00 127,944.00
2207 FIRE INSPECTOR I ft gem Step: 1178 3,230.00 77,520.00 178 2207 ft gem Step: 2178 3,393.00 81,432.00
2207 ft gem Step: 3178 3,562.00 85,488.00
2207 ft gem Step: 4178 3,740.00 89,760.00
2207 ft gem Step: 5178 3,927.00 94,248.00
2208 FIRE INSPECTOR II ft gem Step: 1182 3,554.00 85,296.00 182 2208 ft gem Step: 2182 3,732.00 89,568.00
2208 ft gem Step: 3182 3,918.00 94,032.00
2208 ft gem Step: 4182 4,114.00 98,736.00
2208 ft gem Step: 5182 4,319.00 103,656.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 11 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 17, Packet Page 141 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4309 FIRE PREV PLANS EXAM/INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1369 4,073.00 97,752.00 369 4309 ft gem Step: 2369 4,277.00 102,648.00
4309 ft gem Step: 3369 4,490.00 107,760.00
4309 ft gem Step: 4369 4,715.00 113,160.00
4309 ft gem Step: 5369 4,948.00 118,752.00
3329 FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1324 2,969.00 71,256.00 324 3329 ft gem Step: 2324 3,117.00 74,808.00
3329 ft gem Step: 3324 3,271.00 78,504.00
3329 ft gem Step: 4324 3,436.00 82,464.00
3329 ft gem Step: 5324 3,607.00 86,568.00
2206 FIREFIGHTER ft mffa Step: 1062 3,976.00 95,424.00 062 2206 ft mffa Step: 2062 4,175.00 100,200.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 3062 4,385.00 105,240.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 4062 4,603.00 110,472.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 5062 4,835.00 116,040.00
5212 FITNESS SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1375 3,917.00 94,008.00 375 5212 pt gem Step: 2375 4,110.00 98,640.00
5212 pt gem Step: 3375 4,315.00 103,560.00
5212 pt gem Step: 4375 4,530.00 108,720.00
5212 pt gem Step: 5375 4,756.00 114,144.00
6307 FLEET MANAGER rpt mea Step: 1360 4,464.00 107,136.00 360 6307 rpt mea Step: 2360 4,687.00 112,488.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 3360 4,921.00 118,104.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 4360 5,170.00 124,080.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 5360 5,429.00 130,296.00
6810 FUND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1356 3,399.00 81,576.00 356 6810 pt gem Step: 2356 3,569.00 85,656.00
6810 pt gem Step: 3356 3,746.00 89,904.00
6810 pt gem Step: 4356 3,932.00 94,368.00
6810 pt gem Step: 5356 4,130.00 99,120.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 12 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 18, Packet Page 142 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1285 GEN SERV FIELD OPERATION MGR ft mea Step: 1339 5,300.00 127,200.00 339 1285 ft mea Step: 2339 5,565.00 133,560.00
1285 ft mea Step: 3339 5,843.00 140,232.00
1285 ft mea Step: 4339 6,135.00 147,240.00
1285 ft mea Step: 5339 6,442.00 154,608.00
1272 GENERAL SRVC SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1313 5,981.00 143,544.00 313 1272 ft mea Step: 2313 6,275.00 150,600.00
1272 ft mea Step: 3313 6,594.00 158,256.00
1272 ft mea Step: 4313 6,922.00 166,128.00
1272 ft mea Step: 5313 7,268.00 174,432.00
3602 GEO INFO SYS (GIS) COORDINATOR ft mea Step: 1248 4,307.00 103,368.00 248 3602 ft mea Step: 2248 4,522.00 108,528.00
3602 ft mea Step: 3248 4,749.00 113,976.00
3602 ft mea Step: 4248 4,985.00 119,640.00
3602 ft mea Step: 5248 5,235.00 125,640.00
6720 GREENBELT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1115 2,906.00 69,744.00 115 6720 pt gem Step: 2115 3,051.00 73,224.00
6720 pt gem Step: 3115 3,201.00 76,824.00
6720 pt gem Step: 4115 3,369.00 80,856.00
6720 pt gem Step: 5115 3,535.00 84,840.00
5307 GUEST SERVICE SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1372 2,278.00 54,672.00 372 5307 pt gem Step: 2372 2,394.00 57,456.00
5307 pt gem Step: 3372 2,514.00 60,336.00
5307 pt gem Step: 4372 2,640.00 63,360.00
5307 pt gem Step: 5372 2,770.00 66,480.00
6111 HARBOR COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1359 3,348.00 80,352.00 359 6111 ft gem Step: 2359 3,515.00 84,360.00
6111 ft gem Step: 3359 3,692.00 88,608.00
6111 ft gem Step: 4359 3,876.00 93,024.00
6111 ft gem Step: 5359 4,070.00 97,680.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 13 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 19, Packet Page 143 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6110 HARBOR MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1269 2,913.00 69,912.00 269 6110 ft gem Step: 2269 3,058.00 73,392.00
6110 ft gem Step: 3269 3,215.00 77,160.00
6110 ft gem Step: 4269 3,369.00 80,856.00
6110 ft gem Step: 5269 3,538.00 84,912.00
6102 HARBOR MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1186 3,135.00 75,240.00 186 6102 ft gem Step: 2186 3,290.00 78,960.00
6102 ft gem Step: 3186 3,460.00 83,040.00
6102 ft gem Step: 4186 3,629.00 87,096.00
6102 ft gem Step: 5186 3,812.00 91,488.00
6105 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER pt gem Step: 1120 2,627.00 63,048.00 120 6105 pt gem Step: 2120 2,759.00 66,216.00
6105 pt gem Step: 3120 2,900.00 69,600.00
6105 pt gem Step: 4120 3,043.00 73,032.00
6105 pt gem Step: 5120 3,197.00 76,728.00
1210 HARBORMASTER ft mea Step: 1020 5,605.00 134,520.00 020 1210 ft mea Step: 2020 5,886.00 141,264.00
1210 ft mea Step: 3020 6,181.00 148,344.00
1210 ft mea Step: 4020 6,491.00 155,784.00
1210 ft mea Step: 5020 6,808.00 163,392.00
4208 HCD COORDINATOR-PROJ &PROGRAMS ft gem Step: 1230 3,535.00 84,840.00 230 4208 ft gem Step: 2230 3,710.00 89,040.00
4208 ft gem Step: 3230 3,896.00 93,504.00
4208 ft gem Step: 4230 4,091.00 98,184.00
4208 ft gem Step: 5230 4,296.00 103,104.00
6512 HISTORIC FAC. SR. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1203 3,283.00 78,792.00 203 6512 ft gem Step: 2203 3,450.00 82,800.00
6512 ft gem Step: 3203 3,624.00 86,976.00
6512 ft gem Step: 4203 3,807.00 91,368.00
6512 ft gem Step: 5203 3,995.00 95,880.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 14 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 20, Packet Page 144 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2106 HOMELESS NAVIGATOR ft gem Step: 1198 3,432.00 82,368.00 198 2106 ft gem Step: 2198 3,604.00 86,496.00
2106 ft gem Step: 3198 3,784.00 90,816.00
2106 ft gem Step: 4198 3,973.00 95,352.00
2106 ft gem Step: 5198 4,171.00 100,104.00
1289 HOUSING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1368 4,842.00 116,208.00 368 1289 ft mea Step: 2368 5,085.00 122,040.00
1289 ft mea Step: 3368 5,338.00 128,112.00
1289 ft mea Step: 4368 5,609.00 134,616.00
1289 ft mea Step: 5368 5,890.00 141,360.00
1250 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST ft mea Step: 1267 3,931.00 94,344.00 267 1250 ft mea Step: 2267 4,130.00 99,120.00
1250 ft mea Step: 3267 4,335.00 104,040.00
1250 ft mea Step: 4267 4,552.00 109,248.00
1250 ft mea Step: 5267 4,780.00 114,720.00
3331 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1335 2,523.00 60,552.00 335 3331 ft gem Step: 2335 2,649.00 63,576.00
3331 ft gem Step: 3335 2,782.00 66,768.00
3331 ft gem Step: 4335 2,921.00 70,104.00
3331 ft gem Step: 5335 3,069.00 73,656.00
3332 HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1361 3,348.00 80,352.00 361 3332 ft gem Step: 2361 3,515.00 84,360.00
3332 ft gem Step: 3361 3,692.00 88,608.00
3332 ft gem Step: 4361 3,876.00 93,024.00
3332 ft gem Step: 5361 4,070.00 97,680.00
1112 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5277 9,236.00 221,664.00 277 3322 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1280 3,018.00 72,432.00 280 3322 ft gem Step: 2280 3,167.00 76,008.00
3322 ft gem Step: 3280 3,323.00 79,752.00
3322 ft gem Step: 4280 3,491.00 83,784.00
3322 ft gem Step: 5280 3,666.00 87,984.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 15 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 21, Packet Page 145 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4307 HVAC SENIOR TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1306 3,386.00 81,264.00 306 4307 ft gem Step: 2306 3,557.00 85,368.00
4307 ft gem Step: 3306 3,732.00 89,568.00
4307 ft gem Step: 4306 3,921.00 94,104.00
4307 ft gem Step: 5306 4,116.00 98,784.00
3107 INFORMATION TECH SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1378 3,350.00 80,400.00 378 3107 ft gem Step: 2378 3,517.00 84,408.00
3107 ft gem Step: 3378 3,696.00 88,704.00
3107 ft gem Step: 4378 3,879.00 93,096.00
3107 ft gem Step: 5378 4,073.00 97,752.00
3108 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST ft gem Step: 1377 3,973.00 95,352.00 377 3108 ft gem Step: 2377 4,173.00 100,152.00
3108 ft gem Step: 3377 4,382.00 105,168.00
3108 ft gem Step: 4377 4,601.00 110,424.00
3108 ft gem Step: 5377 4,833.00 115,992.00
4301 INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1100 3,880.00 93,120.00 100 4301 ft gem Step: 2100 4,071.00 97,704.00
4301 ft gem Step: 3100 4,282.00 102,768.00
4301 ft gem Step: 4100 4,490.00 107,760.00
4301 ft gem Step: 5100 4,716.00 113,184.00
3610 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER I ft gem Step: 1069 3,820.00 91,680.00 069 3610 ft gem Step: 2069 4,012.00 96,288.00
3610 ft gem Step: 3069 4,213.00 101,112.00
3610 ft gem Step: 4069 4,424.00 106,176.00
3610 ft gem Step: 5069 4,647.00 111,528.00
1236 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER II ft gem Step: 1038 4,590.00 110,160.00 038 1236 ft gem Step: 2038 4,818.00 115,632.00
1236 ft gem Step: 3038 5,060.00 121,440.00
1236 ft gem Step: 4038 5,311.00 127,464.00
1236 ft gem Step: 5038 5,577.00 133,848.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 16 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 22, Packet Page 146 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3611 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER III ft gem Step: 1080 4,965.00 119,160.00 080 3611 ft gem Step: 2080 5,213.00 125,112.00
3611 ft gem Step: 3080 5,473.00 131,352.00
3611 ft gem Step: 4080 5,747.00 137,928.00
3611 ft gem Step: 5080 6,031.00 144,744.00
3604 IT NETWORK ENGINEER I ft mea Step: 1380 4,966.00 119,184.00 380 3604 ft mea Step: 2380 5,213.00 125,112.00
3604 ft mea Step: 3380 5,469.00 131,256.00
3604 ft mea Step: 4380 5,747.00 137,928.00
3604 ft mea Step: 5380 6,028.00 144,672.00
6508 LAUNDRY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1250 1,311.00 31,464.00 250 6508 pt gem Step: 2250 1,379.00 33,096.00
6508 pt gem Step: 3250 1,444.00 34,656.00
6508 pt gem Step: 4250 1,519.00 36,456.00
6508 pt gem Step: 5250 1,591.00 38,184.00
6518 LEAD CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1142 2,441.00 58,584.00 142 6518 pt gem Step: 2142 2,564.00 61,536.00
6518 pt gem Step: 3142 2,693.00 64,632.00
6518 pt gem Step: 4142 2,828.00 67,872.00
6518 pt gem Step: 5142 2,968.00 71,232.00
6304 LEAD MECHANIC rpt gem Step: 1254 3,270.00 78,480.00 254 6304 rpt gem Step: 2254 3,439.00 82,536.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 3254 3,607.00 86,568.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 4254 3,789.00 90,936.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 5254 3,975.00 95,400.00
3316 LEGAL SECRETARY pt gem Step: 1078 2,778.00 66,672.00 078 3316 pt gem Step: 2078 2,918.00 70,032.00
3316 pt gem Step: 3078 3,065.00 73,560.00
3316 pt gem Step: 4078 3,218.00 77,232.00
3316 pt gem Step: 5078 3,381.00 81,144.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 17 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 23, Packet Page 147 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5101 LIBRARIAN pt gem Step: 1104 3,204.00 76,896.00 104 5101 pt gem Step: 2104 3,361.00 80,664.00
5101 pt gem Step: 3104 3,532.00 84,768.00
5101 pt gem Step: 4104 3,706.00 88,944.00
5101 pt gem Step: 5104 3,891.00 93,384.00
3101 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I pt gem Step: 1063 2,342.00 56,208.00 063 3101 pt gem Step: 2063 2,458.00 58,992.00
3101 pt gem Step: 3063 2,580.00 61,920.00
3101 pt gem Step: 4063 2,710.00 65,040.00
3101 pt gem Step: 5063 2,845.00 68,280.00
3102 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1064 2,457.00 58,968.00 064 3102 ft gem Step: 2064 2,579.00 61,896.00
3102 ft gem Step: 3064 2,708.00 64,992.00
3102 ft gem Step: 4064 2,844.00 68,256.00
3102 ft gem Step: 5064 2,988.00 71,712.00
3104 LIBRARY ASSISTANT III ft gem Step: 1066 2,704.00 64,896.00 066 3104 ft gem Step: 2066 2,841.00 68,184.00
3104 ft gem Step: 3066 2,984.00 71,616.00
3104 ft gem Step: 4066 3,133.00 75,192.00
3104 ft gem Step: 5066 3,292.00 79,008.00
1105 LIBRARY DIRECTOR pt exec Step: 5003 8,845.00 212,280.00 003 1255 LIBRARY MANAGER pt mea Step: 1028 4,739.00 113,736.00 028 1255 pt mea Step: 2028 4,975.00 119,400.00
1255 pt mea Step: 3028 5,221.00 125,304.00
1255 pt mea Step: 4028 5,486.00 131,664.00
1255 pt mea Step: 5028 5,756.00 138,144.00
6718 MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1299 2,441.00 58,584.00 299 6718 pt gem Step: 2299 2,564.00 61,536.00
6718 pt gem Step: 3299 2,693.00 64,632.00
6718 pt gem Step: 4299 2,823.00 67,752.00
6718 pt gem Step: 5299 2,967.00 71,208.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 18 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 24, Packet Page 148 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6109 MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1216 2,930.00 70,320.00 216 6109 ft gem Step: 2216 3,077.00 73,848.00
6109 ft gem Step: 3216 3,228.00 77,472.00
6109 ft gem Step: 4216 3,391.00 81,384.00
6109 ft gem Step: 5216 3,562.00 85,488.00
1249 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I ft mea Step: 1187 3,931.00 94,344.00 187 1249 ft mea Step: 2187 4,130.00 99,120.00
1249 ft mea Step: 3187 4,335.00 104,040.00
1249 ft mea Step: 4187 4,552.00 109,248.00
1249 ft mea Step: 5187 4,780.00 114,720.00
1301 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II ft mea Step: 1047 4,771.00 114,504.00 047 1301 ft mea Step: 2047 5,010.00 120,240.00
1301 ft mea Step: 3047 5,260.00 126,240.00
1301 ft mea Step: 4047 5,523.00 132,552.00
1301 ft mea Step: 5047 5,800.00 139,200.00
3328 MARINA HARBOR ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1298 3,113.00 74,712.00 298 3328 ft gem Step: 2298 3,267.00 78,408.00
3328 ft gem Step: 3298 3,433.00 82,392.00
3328 ft gem Step: 4298 3,604.00 86,496.00
3328 ft gem Step: 5298 3,786.00 90,864.00
8101 MAYOR ft counc Step: 1300 708.75 17,010.00 300
6813 MEDIA SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1094 2,457.00 58,968.00 094 6813 pt gem Step: 2094 2,579.00 61,896.00
6813 pt gem Step: 3094 2,708.00 64,992.00
6813 pt gem Step: 4094 2,844.00 68,256.00
6813 pt gem Step: 5094 2,988.00 71,712.00
5306 MEDICAL RECORDS ASSISTANT pt gem Step: 1711 2,457.00 58,968.00 711 5306 pt gem Step: 2711 2,579.00 61,896.00
5306 pt gem Step: 3711 2,708.00 64,992.00
5306 pt gem Step: 4711 2,844.00 68,256.00
5306 pt gem Step: 5711 2,988.00 71,712.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 19 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 25, Packet Page 149 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1282 MUSEUM CULTURAL ARTS /ARCH MGR pt mea Step: 1336 3,931.00 94,344.00 336 1282 pt mea Step: 2336 4,130.00 99,120.00
1282 pt mea Step: 3336 4,335.00 104,040.00
1282 pt mea Step: 4336 4,552.00 109,248.00
1282 pt mea Step: 5336 4,780.00 114,720.00
1284 NETWORK ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1338 4,774.00 114,576.00 338 1284 ft mea Step: 2338 5,011.00 120,264.00
1284 ft mea Step: 3338 5,262.00 126,288.00
1284 ft mea Step: 4338 5,523.00 132,552.00
1284 ft mea Step: 5338 5,800.00 139,200.00
6515 OPERATIONS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1322 3,348.00 80,352.00 322 6515 pt gem Step: 2322 3,515.00 84,360.00
6515 pt gem Step: 3322 3,692.00 88,608.00
6515 pt gem Step: 4322 3,876.00 93,024.00
6515 pt gem Step: 5322 4,070.00 97,680.00
6506 OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1139 3,687.00 88,488.00 139 6506 pt gem Step: 2139 3,872.00 92,928.00
6506 pt gem Step: 3139 4,065.00 97,560.00
6506 pt gem Step: 4139 4,267.00 102,408.00
6506 pt gem Step: 5139 4,481.00 107,544.00
6703 PARK ATTENDANT ft gem Step: 1158 2,649.00 63,576.00 158 6703 ft gem Step: 2158 2,784.00 66,816.00
6703 ft gem Step: 3158 2,922.00 70,128.00
6703 ft gem Step: 4158 3,067.00 73,608.00
6703 ft gem Step: 5158 3,224.00 77,376.00
6704 PARK MAINTENANCE CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1194 2,715.00 65,160.00 194 6704 ft gem Step: 2194 2,852.00 68,448.00
6704 ft gem Step: 3194 2,993.00 71,832.00
6704 ft gem Step: 4194 3,142.00 75,408.00
6704 ft gem Step: 5194 3,297.00 79,128.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 20 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 26, Packet Page 150 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6705 PARK MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1160 2,992.00 71,808.00 160 6705 ft gem Step: 2160 3,141.00 75,384.00
6705 ft gem Step: 3160 3,294.00 79,056.00
6705 ft gem Step: 4160 3,458.00 82,992.00
6705 ft gem Step: 5160 3,635.00 87,240.00
6701 PARK MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1156 3,460.00 83,040.00 156 6701 ft gem Step: 2156 3,635.00 87,240.00
6701 ft gem Step: 3156 3,818.00 91,632.00
6701 ft gem Step: 4156 4,007.00 96,168.00
6701 ft gem Step: 5156 4,206.00 100,944.00
6706 PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1161 2,234.00 53,616.00 161 6706 ft gem Step: 2161 2,346.00 56,304.00
6706 ft gem Step: 3161 2,463.00 59,112.00
6706 ft gem Step: 4161 2,587.00 62,088.00
6706 ft gem Step: 5161 2,715.00 65,160.00
6706 ft gem Step: 6161 2,851.00 68,424.00
6706 ft gem Step: 7161 2,993.00 71,832.00
1283 PARK OPERATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1337 4,464.00 107,136.00 337 1283 ft mea Step: 2337 4,687.00 112,488.00
1283 ft mea Step: 3337 4,921.00 118,104.00
1283 ft mea Step: 4337 5,170.00 124,080.00
1283 ft mea Step: 5337 5,429.00 130,296.00
6606 PARKING CONTROLS TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1274 3,057.00 73,368.00 274 6606 ft gem Step: 2274 3,208.00 76,992.00
6606 ft gem Step: 3274 3,368.00 80,832.00
6606 ft gem Step: 4274 3,540.00 84,960.00
6606 ft gem Step: 5274 3,714.00 89,136.00
6601 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ft gem Step: 1145 2,627.00 63,048.00 145 6601 ft gem Step: 2145 2,761.00 66,264.00
6601 ft gem Step: 3145 2,899.00 69,576.00
6601 ft gem Step: 4145 3,042.00 73,008.00
6601 ft gem Step: 5145 3,197.00 76,728.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 21 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 27, Packet Page 151 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6605 PARKING ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1149 3,686.00 88,464.00 149 6605 ft gem Step: 2149 3,872.00 92,928.00
6605 ft gem Step: 3149 4,065.00 97,560.00
6605 ft gem Step: 4149 4,267.00 102,408.00
6605 ft gem Step: 5149 4,481.00 107,544.00
6615 PARKING MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1159 3,135.00 75,240.00 159 6615 ft gem Step: 2159 3,290.00 78,960.00
6615 ft gem Step: 3159 3,460.00 83,040.00
6615 ft gem Step: 4159 3,629.00 87,096.00
6615 ft gem Step: 5159 3,812.00 91,488.00
6604 PARKING MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1148 3,708.00 88,992.00 148 6604 ft gem Step: 2148 3,895.00 93,480.00
6604 ft gem Step: 3148 4,090.00 98,160.00
6604 ft gem Step: 4148 4,293.00 103,032.00
6604 ft gem Step: 5148 4,508.00 108,192.00
6608 PARKING MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1151 2,229.00 53,496.00 151 6608 ft gem Step: 2151 2,340.00 56,160.00
6608 ft gem Step: 3151 2,457.00 58,968.00
6608 ft gem Step: 4151 2,580.00 61,920.00
6608 ft gem Step: 5151 2,709.00 65,016.00
6608 ft gem Step: 6151 2,843.00 68,232.00
6608 ft gem Step: 7151 2,986.00 71,664.00
6616 PARKING SERVICES COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1116 4,000.00 96,000.00 116 6616 pt gem Step: 2116 4,197.00 100,728.00
6616 pt gem Step: 3116 4,407.00 105,768.00
6616 pt gem Step: 4116 4,629.00 111,096.00
6616 pt gem Step: 5116 4,862.00 116,688.00
6617 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV pt gem Step: 1117 2,457.00 58,968.00 117 6617 pt gem Step: 2117 2,580.00 61,920.00
6617 pt gem Step: 3117 2,709.00 65,016.00
6617 pt gem Step: 4117 2,843.00 68,232.00
6617 pt gem Step: 5117 2,986.00 71,664.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 22 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 28, Packet Page 152 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6618 PARKING SERVICES SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1118 3,036.00 72,864.00 118 6618 pt gem Step: 2118 3,186.00 76,464.00
6618 pt gem Step: 3118 3,343.00 80,232.00
6618 pt gem Step: 4118 3,512.00 84,288.00
6618 pt gem Step: 5118 3,688.00 88,512.00
1212 PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1022 5,605.00 134,520.00 022 1212 ft mea Step: 2022 5,886.00 141,264.00
1212 ft mea Step: 3022 6,181.00 148,344.00
1212 ft mea Step: 4022 6,491.00 155,784.00
1212 ft mea Step: 5022 6,808.00 163,392.00
1292 PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5014 9,084.00 218,016.00 014 6711 PARKS CRAFTS LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1264 2,967.00 71,208.00 264 6711 ft gem Step: 2264 3,115.00 74,760.00
6711 ft gem Step: 3264 3,267.00 78,408.00
6711 ft gem Step: 4264 3,430.00 82,320.00
6711 ft gem Step: 5264 3,605.00 86,520.00
6305 PARTS CLERK ft gem Step: 1253 2,457.00 58,968.00 253 6305 ft gem Step: 2253 2,580.00 61,920.00
6305 ft gem Step: 3253 2,709.00 65,016.00
6305 ft gem Step: 4253 2,843.00 68,232.00
6305 ft gem Step: 5253 2,986.00 71,664.00
1215 PLANNING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1025 6,394.00 153,456.00 025 1215 ft mea Step: 2025 6,713.00 161,112.00
1215 ft mea Step: 3025 7,050.00 169,200.00
1215 ft mea Step: 4025 7,403.00 177,672.00
1215 ft mea Step: 5025 7,773.00 186,552.00
4305 PLANS EXAMINER ft gem Step: 1258 4,073.00 97,752.00 258 4305 ft gem Step: 2258 4,277.00 102,648.00
4305 ft gem Step: 3258 4,490.00 107,760.00
4305 ft gem Step: 4258 4,715.00 113,160.00
4305 ft gem Step: 5258 4,948.00 118,752.00
1111 POLICE CHIEF ft exec Step: 5007 11,380.00 273,120.00 007 General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 23 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 29, Packet Page 153 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1214 POLICE LIEUTENANT ft plma Step: 1024 7,122.00 170,928.00 024 1214 ft plma Step: 2024 7,479.00 179,496.00
1214 ft plma Step: 3024 7,857.00 188,568.00
1214 ft plma Step: 4024 8,249.00 197,976.00
1214 ft plma Step: 5024 8,660.00 207,840.00
2103 POLICE OFFICER ft mpa Step: 1057 4,547.00 109,128.00 057 2103 ft mpa Step: 2057 4,775.00 114,600.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 3057 5,017.00 120,408.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 4057 5,262.00 126,288.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 5057 5,522.00 132,528.00
3201 POLICE RECORDS/DETENTION SUP. ft gem Step: 1191 4,155.00 99,720.00 191 3201 ft gem Step: 2191 4,363.00 104,712.00
3201 ft gem Step: 3191 4,582.00 109,968.00
3201 ft gem Step: 4191 4,811.00 115,464.00
3201 ft gem Step: 5191 5,053.00 121,272.00
2105 POLICE SERGEANT ft mpa Step: 1058 5,551.00 133,224.00 058 2105 ft mpa Step: 2058 5,825.00 139,800.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 3058 6,118.00 146,832.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 4058 6,423.00 154,152.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 5058 6,750.00 162,000.00
3209 POLICE SERVICES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1346 2,523.00 60,552.00 346 3209 ft gem Step: 2346 2,649.00 63,576.00
3209 ft gem Step: 3346 2,782.00 66,768.00
3209 ft gem Step: 4346 2,921.00 70,104.00
3209 ft gem Step: 5346 3,069.00 73,656.00
3205 POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1068 3,105.00 74,520.00 068 3205 ft gem Step: 2068 3,259.00 78,216.00
3205 ft gem Step: 3068 3,421.00 82,104.00
3205 ft gem Step: 4068 3,593.00 86,232.00
3205 ft gem Step: 5068 3,772.00 90,528.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 24 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 30, Packet Page 154 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1267 PRINCIPAL PLANNER ft mea Step: 1307 5,190.00 124,560.00 307 1267 ft mea Step: 2307 5,452.00 130,848.00
1267 ft mea Step: 3307 5,721.00 137,304.00
1267 ft mea Step: 4307 6,009.00 144,216.00
1267 ft mea Step: 5307 6,309.00 151,416.00
1259 PROPERTY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1030 5,087.00 122,088.00 030 1259 ft mea Step: 2030 5,404.00 129,696.00
1259 ft mea Step: 3030 5,723.00 137,352.00
1259 ft mea Step: 4030 6,039.00 144,936.00
1259 ft mea Step: 5030 6,358.00 152,592.00
3306 PROPERTY TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1219 2,967.00 71,208.00 219 3306 ft gem Step: 2219 3,116.00 74,784.00
3306 ft gem Step: 3219 3,272.00 78,528.00
3306 ft gem Step: 4219 3,435.00 82,440.00
3306 ft gem Step: 5219 3,607.00 86,568.00
1116 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5009 9,929.00 238,296.00 009 4105 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1092 3,534.00 84,816.00 092 4105 ft gem Step: 2092 3,709.00 89,016.00
4105 ft gem Step: 3092 3,897.00 93,528.00
4105 ft gem Step: 4092 4,093.00 98,232.00
4105 ft gem Step: 5092 4,297.00 103,128.00
1275 PURCHASING ANALYST ft mea Step: 1327 3,932.00 94,368.00 327 1275 ft mea Step: 2327 4,129.00 99,096.00
1275 ft mea Step: 3327 4,336.00 104,064.00
1275 ft mea Step: 4327 4,552.00 109,248.00
1275 ft mea Step: 5327 4,780.00 114,720.00
1234 PW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MGR ft mea Step: 1036 5,605.00 134,520.00 036 1234 ft mea Step: 2036 5,886.00 141,264.00
1234 ft mea Step: 3036 6,181.00 148,344.00
1234 ft mea Step: 4036 6,491.00 155,784.00
1234 ft mea Step: 5036 6,808.00 163,392.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 25 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 31, Packet Page 155 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4102 QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1234 3,880.00 93,120.00 234 4102 ft gem Step: 2234 4,071.00 97,704.00
4102 ft gem Step: 3234 4,282.00 102,768.00
4102 ft gem Step: 4234 4,490.00 107,760.00
4102 ft gem Step: 5234 4,716.00 113,184.00
5208 RECREATION COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1292 3,348.00 80,352.00 292 5208 pt gem Step: 2292 3,515.00 84,360.00
5208 pt gem Step: 3292 3,692.00 88,608.00
5208 pt gem Step: 4292 3,876.00 93,024.00
5208 pt gem Step: 5292 4,070.00 97,680.00
1230 RECREATION MANAGER ft mea Step: 1291 5,605.00 134,520.00 291 1230 ft mea Step: 2291 5,886.00 141,264.00
1230 ft mea Step: 3291 6,181.00 148,344.00
1230 ft mea Step: 4291 6,491.00 155,784.00
1230 ft mea Step: 5291 6,808.00 163,392.00
9581 RECREATION SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1323 2,278.00 54,672.00 323 9581 pt gem Step: 2323 2,394.00 57,456.00
9581 pt gem Step: 3323 2,514.00 60,336.00
9581 pt gem Step: 4323 2,640.00 63,360.00
9581 pt gem Step: 5323 2,770.00 66,480.00
5201 RECREATION SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1259 3,917.00 94,008.00 259 5201 ft gem Step: 2259 4,110.00 98,640.00
5201 ft gem Step: 3259 4,315.00 103,560.00
5201 ft gem Step: 4259 4,530.00 108,720.00
5201 ft gem Step: 5259 4,756.00 114,144.00
1256 RISK MANAGER ft mea Step: 1052 4,672.00 112,128.00 052 1256 ft mea Step: 2052 4,903.00 117,672.00
1256 ft mea Step: 3052 5,145.00 123,480.00
1256 ft mea Step: 4052 5,402.00 129,648.00
1256 ft mea Step: 5052 5,672.00 136,128.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 26 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 32, Packet Page 156 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3333 RISK SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1371 3,018.00 72,432.00 371 3333 ft gem Step: 2371 3,167.00 76,008.00
3333 ft gem Step: 3371 3,323.00 79,752.00
3333 ft gem Step: 4371 3,491.00 83,784.00
3333 ft gem Step: 5371 3,666.00 87,984.00
6516 SALES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1081 3,348.00 80,352.00 081 6516 ft gem Step: 2081 3,515.00 84,360.00
6516 ft gem Step: 3081 3,692.00 88,608.00
6516 ft gem Step: 4081 3,876.00 93,024.00
6516 ft gem Step: 5081 4,070.00 97,680.00
1263 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT ft mea Step: 1262 4,493.00 107,832.00 262 1263 ft mea Step: 2262 4,715.00 113,160.00
1263 ft mea Step: 3262 4,948.00 118,752.00
1263 ft mea Step: 4262 5,196.00 124,704.00
1263 ft mea Step: 5262 5,456.00 130,944.00
1265 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1284 4,493.00 107,832.00 284 1265 ft mea Step: 2284 4,715.00 113,160.00
1265 ft mea Step: 3284 4,948.00 118,752.00
1265 ft mea Step: 4284 5,196.00 124,704.00
1265 ft mea Step: 5284 5,456.00 130,944.00
4201 SENIOR ASSOCIATE PLANNER ft gem Step: 1251 4,352.00 104,448.00 251 4201 ft gem Step: 2251 4,571.00 109,704.00
4201 ft gem Step: 3251 4,800.00 115,200.00
4201 ft gem Step: 4251 5,036.00 120,864.00
4201 ft gem Step: 5251 5,289.00 126,936.00
4302 SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1101 4,073.00 97,752.00 101 4302 ft gem Step: 2101 4,277.00 102,648.00
4302 ft gem Step: 3101 4,490.00 107,760.00
4302 ft gem Step: 4101 4,715.00 113,160.00
4302 ft gem Step: 5101 4,948.00 118,752.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 27 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 33, Packet Page 157 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6511 SENIOR CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1205 3,283.00 78,792.00 205 6511 ft gem Step: 2205 3,450.00 82,800.00
6511 ft gem Step: 3205 3,624.00 86,976.00
6511 ft gem Step: 4205 3,807.00 91,368.00
6511 ft gem Step: 5205 3,995.00 95,880.00
6514 SENIOR CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1257 2,175.00 52,200.00 257 6514 pt gem Step: 2257 2,282.00 54,768.00
6514 pt gem Step: 3257 2,397.00 57,528.00
6514 pt gem Step: 4257 2,519.00 60,456.00
6514 pt gem Step: 5257 2,647.00 63,528.00
1246 SENIOR ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1256 5,698.00 136,752.00 256 1246 ft mea Step: 2256 5,999.00 143,976.00
1246 ft mea Step: 3256 6,315.00 151,560.00
1246 ft mea Step: 4256 6,647.00 159,528.00
1246 ft mea Step: 5256 7,342.00 176,208.00
6505 SENIOR FACILITY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1211 3,127.00 75,048.00 211 6505 pt gem Step: 2211 3,283.00 78,792.00
6505 pt gem Step: 3211 3,445.00 82,680.00
6505 pt gem Step: 4211 3,617.00 86,808.00
6505 pt gem Step: 5211 3,801.00 91,224.00
1296 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCS ANALYST ft mea Step: 1376 4,493.00 107,832.00 376 1296 ft mea Step: 2376 4,715.00 113,160.00
1296 ft mea Step: 3376 4,948.00 118,752.00
1296 ft mea Step: 4376 5,196.00 124,704.00
1296 ft mea Step: 5376 5,456.00 130,944.00
3607 SENIOR INFORMATION TECH SPECIA ft gem Step: 1084 3,732.00 89,568.00 084 3607 ft gem Step: 2084 3,918.00 94,032.00
3607 ft gem Step: 3084 4,113.00 98,712.00
3607 ft gem Step: 4084 4,319.00 103,656.00
3607 ft gem Step: 5084 4,535.00 108,840.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 28 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 34, Packet Page 158 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1279 SENIOR LOCKSMITH ft gem Step: 1331 3,283.00 78,792.00 331 1279 ft gem Step: 2331 3,450.00 82,800.00
1279 ft gem Step: 3331 3,624.00 86,976.00
1279 ft gem Step: 4331 3,807.00 91,368.00
1279 ft gem Step: 5331 3,995.00 95,880.00
6707 SENIOR PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1162 2,715.00 65,160.00 162 6707 ft gem Step: 2162 2,852.00 68,448.00
6707 ft gem Step: 3162 2,993.00 71,832.00
6707 ft gem Step: 4162 3,142.00 75,408.00
6707 ft gem Step: 5162 3,297.00 79,128.00
6613 SENIOR PARKING CONTROLS TECH. ft gem Step: 1275 3,348.00 80,352.00 275 6613 ft gem Step: 2275 3,515.00 84,360.00
6613 ft gem Step: 3275 3,693.00 88,632.00
6613 ft gem Step: 4275 3,877.00 93,048.00
6613 ft gem Step: 5275 4,070.00 97,680.00
6611 SENIOR PARKING ENFOR. OFFICER ft gem Step: 1154 3,010.00 72,240.00 154 6611 ft gem Step: 2154 3,161.00 75,864.00
6611 ft gem Step: 3154 3,317.00 79,608.00
6611 ft gem Step: 4154 3,485.00 83,640.00
6611 ft gem Step: 5154 3,659.00 87,816.00
6803 SENIOR PARTS CLERK ft gem Step: 1347 2,913.00 69,912.00 347 6803 ft gem Step: 2347 3,058.00 73,392.00
6803 ft gem Step: 3347 3,215.00 77,160.00
6803 ft gem Step: 4347 3,369.00 80,856.00
6803 ft gem Step: 5347 3,538.00 84,912.00
3207 SENIOR POLICE SERVICES TECH. ft gem Step: 1070 3,259.00 78,216.00 070 3207 ft gem Step: 2070 3,421.00 82,104.00
3207 ft gem Step: 3070 3,593.00 86,232.00
3207 ft gem Step: 4070 3,772.00 90,528.00
3207 ft gem Step: 5070 3,962.00 95,088.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 29 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 35, Packet Page 159 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1219 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1029 5,300.00 127,200.00 029 1219 ft mea Step: 2029 5,565.00 133,560.00
1219 ft mea Step: 3029 5,843.00 140,232.00
1219 ft mea Step: 4029 6,135.00 147,240.00
1219 ft mea Step: 5029 6,442.00 154,608.00
4104 SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1093 3,880.00 93,120.00 093 4104 ft gem Step: 2093 4,071.00 97,704.00
4104 ft gem Step: 3093 4,282.00 102,768.00
4104 ft gem Step: 4093 4,490.00 107,760.00
4104 ft gem Step: 5093 4,716.00 113,184.00
6206 SENIOR STREET MAINT. WORKER ft gem Step: 1126 2,734.00 65,616.00 126 6206 ft gem Step: 2126 2,871.00 68,904.00
6206 ft gem Step: 3126 3,015.00 72,360.00
6206 ft gem Step: 4126 3,165.00 75,960.00
6206 ft gem Step: 5126 3,321.00 79,704.00
6212 SIGN CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1183 2,913.00 69,912.00 183 6212 ft gem Step: 2183 3,058.00 73,392.00
6212 ft gem Step: 3183 3,215.00 77,160.00
6212 ft gem Step: 4183 3,369.00 80,856.00
6212 ft gem Step: 5183 3,538.00 84,912.00
6811 SPECIAL EVENT COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1106 3,348.00 80,352.00 106 6811 ft gem Step: 2106 3,515.00 84,360.00
6811 ft gem Step: 3106 3,692.00 88,608.00
6811 ft gem Step: 4106 3,876.00 93,024.00
6811 ft gem Step: 5106 4,070.00 97,680.00
5102 SPECIAL SERVICES COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1199 3,536.00 84,864.00 199 5102 pt gem Step: 2199 3,710.00 89,040.00
5102 pt gem Step: 3199 3,897.00 93,528.00
5102 pt gem Step: 4199 4,091.00 98,184.00
5102 pt gem Step: 5199 4,297.00 103,128.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 30 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 36, Packet Page 160 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1258 SPORTS CENTER MANAGER pt mea Step: 1217 5,605.00 134,520.00 217 1258 pt mea Step: 2217 5,884.00 141,216.00
1258 pt mea Step: 3217 6,180.00 148,320.00
1258 pt mea Step: 4217 6,487.00 155,688.00
1258 pt mea Step: 5217 6,808.00 163,392.00
5204 SPORTS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1110 3,348.00 80,352.00 110 5204 pt gem Step: 2110 3,515.00 84,360.00
5204 pt gem Step: 3110 3,692.00 88,608.00
5204 pt gem Step: 4110 3,876.00 93,024.00
5204 pt gem Step: 5110 4,070.00 97,680.00
6204 STREET & UTILITIES SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1252 3,622.00 86,928.00 252 6204 ft gem Step: 2252 3,801.00 91,224.00
6204 ft gem Step: 3252 3,993.00 95,832.00
6204 ft gem Step: 4252 4,194.00 100,656.00
6204 ft gem Step: 5252 4,402.00 105,648.00
6208 STREET MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1128 3,014.00 72,336.00 128 6208 ft gem Step: 2128 3,164.00 75,936.00
6208 ft gem Step: 3128 3,318.00 79,632.00
6208 ft gem Step: 4128 3,484.00 83,616.00
6208 ft gem Step: 5128 3,661.00 87,864.00
6209 STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1129 2,250.00 54,000.00 129 6209 ft gem Step: 2129 2,363.00 56,712.00
6209 ft gem Step: 3129 2,480.00 59,520.00
6209 ft gem Step: 4129 2,605.00 62,520.00
6209 ft gem Step: 5129 2,734.00 65,616.00
6209 ft gem Step: 6129 2,870.00 68,880.00
6209 ft gem Step: 7129 3,015.00 72,360.00
9214 STREETS & UTILITIES OPERAT MGR ft mea Step: 1363 4,464.00 107,136.00 363 9214 ft mea Step: 2363 4,687.00 112,488.00
9214 ft mea Step: 3363 4,921.00 118,104.00
9214 ft mea Step: 4363 5,170.00 124,080.00
9214 ft mea Step: 5363 5,429.00 130,296.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 31 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 37, Packet Page 161 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5308 SUSTAINABILITY ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1374 3,432.00 82,368.00 374 5308 ft gem Step: 2374 3,605.00 86,520.00
5308 ft gem Step: 3374 3,787.00 90,888.00
5308 ft gem Step: 4374 3,974.00 95,376.00
5308 ft gem Step: 5374 4,171.00 100,104.00
1295 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1365 4,904.00 117,696.00 365 1295 ft mea Step: 2365 5,149.00 123,576.00
1295 ft mea Step: 3365 5,407.00 129,768.00
1295 ft mea Step: 4365 5,679.00 136,296.00
1295 ft mea Step: 5365 5,964.00 143,136.00
1291 SYSTEMS AND NETWORK ADMIN ft mea Step: 1358 5,389.00 129,336.00 358 1291 ft mea Step: 2358 5,660.00 135,840.00
1291 ft mea Step: 3358 5,943.00 142,632.00
1291 ft mea Step: 4358 6,241.00 149,784.00
1291 ft mea Step: 5358 6,546.00 157,104.00
3103 TECHNOLOGY SVCS. SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1271 3,018.00 72,432.00 271 3103 ft gem Step: 2271 3,167.00 76,008.00
3103 ft gem Step: 3271 3,323.00 79,752.00
3103 ft gem Step: 4271 3,491.00 83,784.00
3103 ft gem Step: 5271 3,666.00 87,984.00
1253 URBAN FORESTER pt mea Step: 1321 4,133.00 99,192.00 321 1253 pt mea Step: 2321 4,341.00 104,184.00
1253 pt mea Step: 3321 4,556.00 109,344.00
1253 pt mea Step: 4321 4,783.00 114,792.00
1253 pt mea Step: 5321 5,025.00 120,600.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 32 of 32 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 38, Packet Page 162 8/19/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9373 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT rpt rpt 673Step: 1 29.13 673
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 2 30.59
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 3 32.13
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 4 33.73
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 5 35.43
9329 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT rpt rpt 643Step: 1 26.41 643 9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 2 27.73
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 3 29.12
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 4 30.59
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 5 32.13
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 6 33.73
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 7 35.43
9999 AQUATICS SPECIALIST I ptrpt 000Step: 1 21.03 475
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 2 22.08
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 3 23.18
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 4 24.35
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 5 25.59
9534 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST rpt rpt 485Step: 1 28.36 485
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 2 29.78
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 3 31.26
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 4 32.82
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 5 34.48
CULTURAL ARTS ASSISTANT rpt Step: 1 28.36 639
rpt Step: 2 29.78
rpt Step: 3 31.27
rpt Step: 4 32.83
rpt Step: 5 34.50
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 1 of 4 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 39, Packet Page 163 8/19/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9339 CUSTODIAN rpt rpt 471Step: 1 22.80 471
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 2 23.97
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 3 25.16
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 4 26.43
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 5 27.77
9664 FACILITY ATTENDANT rpt rpt 545Step: 1 29.23 545
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 2 30.73
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 3 32.24
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 4 33.86
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 5 35.54
9615 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER rpt rpt 713Step: 1 30.33 713 9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 2 31.82
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 3 33.44
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 4 35.09
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 5 36.85
LAUNDRY ATTENDANT rpt Step: 1 16.69 580
rpt Step: 2 17.48
rpt Step: 3 18.36
rpt Step: 4 19.27
rpt Step: 5 20.24
9526 LEAD PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR rpt rpt 525Step: 1 24.27 525 9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 2 25.46
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 3 26.75
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 4 28.09
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 5 29.47
LIBRARIAN rpt Step: 1 31.83 546
rpt Step: 2 33.45
rpt Step: 3 35.11
rpt Step: 4 36.87
rpt Step: 5 38.71
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 2 of 4

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 40, Packet Page 164 8/19/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9515 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I rpt rpt 547Step: 1 27.01 547
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 2 28.38
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 3 29.78
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 4 31.29
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 5 32.83
9513 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II rpt rpt 548Step: 1 28.38 548
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 2 29.78
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 3 31.27
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 4 32.83
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 5 34.50
9524 LIFEGUARD rpt rpt 492Step: 1 17.07 492
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 2 17.84
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 3 18.79
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 4 19.71
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 5 20.71
9665 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER rpt rpt 482Step: 1 30.33 482 9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 2 31.82
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 3 33.44
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 4 35.09
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 5 36.85
9662 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV rpt rpt 714Step: 1 28.34 714 9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 2 29.77
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 3 31.24
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 4 32.80
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 5 34.46
9518 PHYSICAL THERAPIST rpt rpt 535Step: 1 53.41 535
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 2 56.08
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 3 58.90
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 4 61.83
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 5 64.92
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 3 of 4

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 41, Packet Page 165 8/19/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9528 RECREATION SPECIALIST rpt rpt 476Step: 1 26.27 476 9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 2 27.59
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 3 28.97
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 4 30.42
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 5 31.97
9519 SITE DIRECTOR/AFTERSCHOOL rpt rpt 513Step: 1 19.04 513 9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 2 20.00
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 3 21.01
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 4 22.04
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 5 23.16
TOT ACTIVITY LEADER rpt Step: 1 19.04 491
rpt Step: 2 20.00
rpt Step: 3 21.01
rpt Step: 4 22.04
rpt Step: 5 23.16
9716 WHARF ATTENDANT rpt rpt 707Step: 1 28.18 707
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 2 29.57
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 3 31.04
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 4 32.60
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 5 34.24
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 4 of 4

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2024 Through 6/30/2025
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 42, Packet Page 166 City of Monterey
Part-Time
Hourly Schedule
Effective: 01-01-24 to 12-31-24
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 43, Packet Page 167 Unrepresented: PTS
Part-Time Seasonal Effective:
01-01-24 to 12-31-24
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 44, Packet Page 168 8/21/2024 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN pts Step: 1 21.02 588
pts Step: 2 22.07
pts Step: 3 23.17
pts Step: 4 24.33
pts Step: 5 25.55
pts Step: 6 26.83
pts Step: 7 28.17
pts Step: 8 29.58
pts Step: 9 31.06
pts Step: 10 32.61
9320 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK ptsn pt 724Step: 1 21.02 724
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 2 22.07
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 3 23.17
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 4 24.33
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 5 25.55
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 6 26.83
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 7 28.17
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 8 29.58
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 9 31.06
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 10 32.61
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 1 of 21 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 45, Packet Page 169 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9523 AQUATICS SPECIALIST ptsn pt 579Step: 23 17.00 579
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 24 17.25
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 25 17.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 26 17.75
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 27 18.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 28 18.25
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 29 18.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 30 18.75
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 31 19.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 32 19.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 33 20.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 34 20.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 35 21.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 36 21.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 37 22.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 38 22.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 39 23.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 40 23.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 41 24.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 42 24.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 43 25.00
9534 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST ptpts 434Step: 1 19.39 434
9534 ptpts 434Step: 2 20.36
9534 ptpts 434Step: 3 21.38
9534 ptpts 434Step: 4 22.45
9534 ptpts 434Step: 5 23.57
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 2 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 46, Packet Page 170 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9545 CAMP COOK ptsn pt 542Step: 13 18.00 542
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 14 18.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 15 18.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 16 18.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 17 19.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 18 19.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 19 19.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 20 19.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 21 20.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 22 20.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 23 20.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 24 20.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 25 21.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 26 21.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 27 21.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 28 21.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 29 22.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 30 22.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 31 22.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 32 22.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 33 23.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 34 23.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 35 23.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 36 23.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 37 24.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 3 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 47, Packet Page 171 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9535 CAMP DIRECTOR/ASSIST CAMP DIR ptsn pt 605Step: 13 19.00 605 9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 14 19.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 15 19.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 16 19.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 17 20.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 18 20.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 19 20.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 20 20.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 21 21.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 22 21.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 23 21.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 24 21.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 25 22.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 26 22.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 27 22.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 28 22.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 29 23.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 30 23.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 31 23.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 32 23.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 33 24.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 34 24.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 35 24.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 36 24.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 37 25.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 4 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 48, Packet Page 172 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9243 COMMUNITY SVC OFFICER INTERN ptsn pt 480Step: 2 16.00 480 9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 3 17.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 4 18.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 5 19.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 6 20.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 7 21.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 8 22.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 9 23.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 10 24.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 11 25.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 5 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 49, Packet Page 173 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9540 DESK ATTENDANT ptsn pt 583Step: 21 16.00 583
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 22 16.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 23 16.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 24 16.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 25 17.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 26 17.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 27 17.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 28 17.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 29 18.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 30 18.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 31 18.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 32 18.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 33 19.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 34 19.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 35 19.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 36 20.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 37 20.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 38 21.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 39 21.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 40 22.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 41 22.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 42 23.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 43 23.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 44 24.00
9546 EXTRA-HELP RETIRED ANNUITANT ptpts 410Step: 1 16.00 410 9546 ptpts 410Step: 5 78.46
9546 ptpts 410Step: 15 115.45
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 6 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 50, Packet Page 174 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9421 FACILITY WORKER ptsn pt 510Step: 1 20.87 510
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 2 21.91
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 3 23.01
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 4 24.16
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 5 25.37
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 6 26.64
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 7 27.97
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 8 29.37
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 9 30.84
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 10 32.38
9216 FIRE INSPECTOR I ptpts 401Step: 1 32.19 401
9216 ptpts 401Step: 2 33.80
9216 ptpts 401Step: 3 35.49
9216 ptpts 401Step: 4 37.26
9216 ptpts 401Step: 5 39.13
9216 ptpts 401Step: 6 41.08
9216 ptpts 401Step: 7 43.14
9216 ptpts 401Step: 8 45.29
9216 ptpts 401Step: 9 47.56
9216 ptpts 401Step: 10 49.94
9419 GUEST SERVICES ATTENDANT ptsn pt 508Step: 1 23.36 508 9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 2 24.53
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 3 25.75
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 4 27.04
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 5 28.39
9340 HARBOR ATTENDANT ptsn pt 725Step: 1 22.48 725
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 2 23.60
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 3 24.78
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 4 26.02
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 5 27.32
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 7 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 51, Packet Page 175 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9221 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN ptsn pt 447Step: 1 25.81 447 9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 2 27.10
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 3 28.46
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 4 29.88
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 5 31.37
9413 INTERN ptsn pt 662Step: 2 16.00 662
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 3 17.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 4 18.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 5 19.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 6 20.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 7 21.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 8 22.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 9 23.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 10 24.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 11 25.00
9379 JANITORIAL WORKER ptsn pt 727Step: 1 17.76 727
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 2 18.65
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 3 19.58
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 4 20.56
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 5 21.59
9314 LIBRARY CLERK ptsn pt 716Step: 1 20.03 716
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 2 21.03
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 3 22.08
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 4 23.18
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 5 24.34
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 6 25.56
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 7 26.84
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 8 28.18
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 9 29.59
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 10 31.07
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 8 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 52, Packet Page 176 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9311 LIBRARY PAGE ptpts 403Step: 3 16.70 403
9311 ptpts 403Step: 4 17.54
9311 ptpts 403Step: 5 18.42
9311 ptpts 403Step: 6 19.33
9311 ptpts 403Step: 7 20.30
9524 LIFEGUARD ptsn pt 578Step: 22 17.00 578
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 23 17.25
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 24 17.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 25 17.75
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 26 18.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 27 18.25
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 28 18.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 29 18.75
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 30 19.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 31 19.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 32 20.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 33 20.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 34 21.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 35 21.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 36 22.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 37 22.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 38 23.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 39 23.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 40 24.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 41 24.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 42 25.00
9613 LITTER CONTROL WORKER ptpts 435Step: 2 16.43 435
9613 ptpts 435Step: 3 17.25
9613 ptpts 435Step: 4 18.12
9613 ptpts 435Step: 5 19.02
9613 ptpts 435Step: 6 19.97
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 9 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 53, Packet Page 177 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9315 MAINTENANCE WORKER ptsn pt 717Step: 1 20.87 717
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 2 21.91
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 3 23.01
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 4 24.16
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 5 25.37
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 6 26.64
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 7 27.97
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 8 29.37
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 9 30.84
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 10 32.38
9350 MILITARY AFFAIRS COORDINATOR ptsn pt 712Step: 1 59.37 712 9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 2 62.34
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 3 65.46
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 4 68.73
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 5 72.16
9316 MUSEUM ATTENDANT ptsn pt 718Step: 3 16.67 718
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 4 17.51
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 5 18.38
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 6 19.30
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 7 20.27
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 8 21.28
PARK ASSISTANT ptsn Step: 1 22.46 719
ptsn Step: 2 23.58
ptsn Step: 3 24.76
ptsn Step: 4 26.00
ptsn Step: 5 27.30
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 10 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 54, Packet Page 178 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9343 PARKING ENFORCEMENT REPRESENT ptsn pt 720Step: 1 22.48 720 9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 2 23.60
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 3 24.78
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 4 26.02
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 5 27.32
6619 PARKING FACILITY ATTENDANT ptsn pt 715Step: 1 16.33 715 6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 2 17.15
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 3 18.00
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 4 18.90
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 5 19.85
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 11 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 55, Packet Page 179 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9582 PERSONAL TRAINER ptsn pt 728Step: 1 20.00 728
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 2 21.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 3 22.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 4 23.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 5 24.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 6 25.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 7 26.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 8 27.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 9 28.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 10 29.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 11 30.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 12 31.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 13 32.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 14 33.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 15 34.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 16 35.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 17 36.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 18 37.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 19 38.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 20 39.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 21 40.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 22 41.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 23 42.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 24 43.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 25 44.00
9217 POLICE OFFICER TRAINEE ptsn pt 453Step: 1 41.96 453 9313 POLICE RECRUIT ptsn pt 486Step: 1 45.61 486
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 12 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 56, Packet Page 180 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9341 PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 721Step: 5 20.00 721
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 6 20.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 7 20.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 8 20.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 9 21.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 10 21.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 11 21.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 12 21.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 13 22.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 14 22.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 15 22.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 16 22.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 17 23.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 18 23.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 19 23.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 20 23.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 21 24.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 22 24.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 23 24.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 24 24.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 25 25.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 26 25.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 27 25.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 28 25.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 29 26.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 13 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 57, Packet Page 181 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9422 RECREATION ASSISTANT ptsn pt 722Step: 1 20.00 722
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 2 21.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 3 22.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 4 23.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 5 24.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 6 25.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 7 26.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 8 27.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 9 28.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 10 29.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 11 30.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 12 31.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 13 32.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 14 33.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 15 34.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 16 35.00
9321 REFERENCE/CHILDRENS LIBRARIAN ptsn pt 723Step: 1 27.37 723 9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 2 28.74
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 3 30.18
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 4 31.69
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 5 33.27
9411 RESERVE POLICE OFFICER ptpts 412Step: 1 50.19 412
9411 ptpts 412Step: 2 52.70
9411 ptpts 412Step: 3 55.37
9411 ptpts 412Step: 4 58.09
9411 ptpts 412Step: 5 60.98
9416 SENIOR AQUATICS SPECIALIST ptsn pt 505Step: 1 34.35 505 9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 2 36.07
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 3 37.87
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 4 39.76
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 5 41.75
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 14 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 58, Packet Page 182 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9417 SENIOR FACILITY SPECIALIST ptsn pt 506Step: 1 34.35 506 9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 2 36.07
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 3 37.87
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 4 39.76
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 5 41.75
SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECH ptsn Step: 1 28.63 448
ptsn Step: 2 30.06
ptsn Step: 3 31.56
ptsn Step: 4 33.14
ptsn Step: 5 34.80
SENIOR SPORTS SPECIALIST ptsn Step: 1 34.35 507
ptsn Step: 2 36.07
ptsn Step: 3 37.87
ptsn Step: 4 39.76
ptsn Step: 5 41.75
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 15 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 59, Packet Page 183 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 617Step: 1 20.00 617 9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 2 21.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 3 22.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 4 23.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 5 24.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 6 25.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 7 26.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 8 27.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 9 28.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 10 29.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 11 30.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 12 31.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 13 32.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 14 33.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 15 34.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 16 35.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 17 36.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 18 37.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 19 38.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 20 39.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 21 40.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 22 41.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 23 42.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 24 43.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 25 44.00
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 618Step: 1 30.00 618 9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 2 30.50
9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 3 31.00
9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 4 31.50
9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 5 32.00
9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 6 32.50
9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 7 33.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 16 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 60, Packet Page 184 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 618Step: 8 33.50 618 9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 9 34.00
9530 ptsn pt 618Step: 10 34.50
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 619Step: 1 35.00 619 9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 2 36.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 3 37.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 4 38.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 5 39.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 6 40.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 7 41.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 8 42.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 9 43.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 10 44.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 17 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 61, Packet Page 185 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9537 SPORTS OFFICIAL ptsn pt 560Step: 1 17.00 560
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 2 18.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 3 19.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 4 20.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 5 21.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 6 22.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 7 23.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 8 24.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 9 25.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 10 26.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 11 27.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 12 28.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 13 29.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 14 30.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 15 31.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 16 32.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 17 33.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 18 34.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 19 35.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 18 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 62, Packet Page 186 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9548 SR REC LEADER/REC LEADER ptsn pt 729Step: 13 18.00 729 9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 14 18.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 15 18.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 16 18.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 17 19.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 18 19.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 19 19.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 20 19.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 21 20.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 22 20.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 23 20.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 24 20.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 25 21.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 26 21.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 27 21.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 28 21.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 29 22.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 30 22.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 31 22.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 32 22.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 33 23.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 34 23.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 35 23.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 36 23.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 37 24.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 19 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 63, Packet Page 187 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9322 SUPPORT ANALYST ptsn pt 726Step: 1 33.98 726
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 2 35.68
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 3 37.46
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 4 39.34
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 5 41.30
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 6 43.37
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 7 45.54
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 8 47.81
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 9 50.20
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 10 52.71
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 11 55.35
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 12 58.12
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 13 61.02
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 14 64.07
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 15 67.28
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 20 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 64, Packet Page 188 8/21/2024
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9527 SUPPORT PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 502Step: 19 17.50 502 9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 20 17.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 21 18.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 22 18.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 23 18.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 24 18.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 25 19.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 26 19.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 27 19.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 28 19.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 29 20.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 30 20.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 31 20.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 32 20.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 33 21.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 34 21.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 35 21.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 36 21.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 37 22.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 38 22.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 39 22.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 40 22.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 41 23.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 42 23.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 43 23.75
9831 WHARF ATTENDANT ptpts 705Step: 1 21.51 705
9831 ptpts 705Step: 2 22.59
9831 ptpts 705Step: 3 23.71
9831 ptpts 705Step: 4 24.90
9831 ptpts 705Step: 5 26.15
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 21 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 1/01/2024 Through 12/31/2024
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 65, Packet Page 189 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Prepared by: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Appoint Councilmember Garcia as Vice Mayor for 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint Councilmember Garcia as the Vice Mayor for 2025.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City’s Charter, Section 3.2 provides: “Vice-Mayor. The Council shall select one of its members to serve as Vice-Mayor. The Vice-Mayor shall serve in the absence or incapacity of the Mayor and shall have all rights and duties of the Mayor in his/her absence. The term of ViceMayor shall be coterminous with that of the Mayor unless a specific term is established by the City Council. The Vice-Mayor shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council.” In December 1992, by minute action, the City Council set the current policy which has the term of office for the appointed Vice Mayor rotate on a yearly basis.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: This action has no fiscal implications.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 190 №10/24
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

If the Council prefers a different system for appointment, the Council may postpone appointment of a Vice Mayor until they meet in January, and request staff to bring alternate Vice Mayor appointment policy options forward at that time for Council’s potential adoption.

DISCUSSION:

In December 1992, by minute action, the City Council set the current policy which has the term of office for the appointed Vice Mayor rotate on a yearly basis. Since that time, the City Council has rotated the office of Vice Mayor each calendar year, with the intent to ensure that each Councilmember has an opportunity to serve as Vice Mayor at least once during their four-year term. These appointments have also often made with experience at the dais in mind. The following is a history of the recent Vice Mayor appointments for the past five years:
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Alan Haffa
Tyller Williamson
Ed Smith
Alan Haffa
Kim Barber
Following the policy, the next Vice Mayor in the rotation would be Councilmember Gino Garcia.

Staff recommends that the Council appoint Councilmember Garcia as Vice Mayor for a one-year term beginning January 1, 2025.

CBK
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 191 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Receive Mayor’s Recommendation and Appoint David Stocker to the Building and Housing Appeals Hearing Board (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the Council receive a recommendation from Mayor Williamson and make an appointment to the Building and Housing Appeals Board, as outlined in the “Discussion” section of this report.

VALUE DRIVER:

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This recommendation conforms to Monterey City Code, the City Council Governance Policy, and the California Maddy Act.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications with this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could take no action. There is no alternate appointment that can be made as there have been no other applicants for this vacancy.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 192 №10/24
DISCUSSION:

Background
Vacancies on the following two City boards and committees were duly noticed by the City Clerk’s Office pursuant to the California Maddy Act and the Council’s appointments policy, seeking qualified applications from Monterey residents, with applications accepted on an ongoing basis until the positions are filled. Pursuant to the Monterey City Code, the Building and Housing Appeals Board (BHAB) requires that members have experience and training to pass on matters pertaining to building construction, with experience in residential or commercial construction projects, the building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection preferred.

Perhaps because of the level of expertise needed, the BHAB has historically been a more difficult board for which to fill vacancies.

One application was received, from the following resident, and is attached to this packet (Attachment 1). The City Clerk’s Office confirmed the applicant’s residency requirement using the property assessment GIS database. The Building Official confirmed that he was qualified to serve pursuant to the requirements outlined in the City Code.

Building and Housing Appeals Board – One (1) Regular Member, One (1) Alternate David Stocker
Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee Oak Grove – One (1) Alternate
No applicants
Skyline Forest – One (1) Alternate
No applicants
Interviews and Recommendations
Mayor Williamson interviewed Mr. Stocker and recommends that the Council make an appointments as follow, for a term ending June 30, 2029:

Building and Housing Appeals Board – One (1) Regular Member, One (1) Alternate David Stocker – Regular Member
Next Steps
If this appointment is made, seats still remain vacant for one alternate to the Building and Housing Appeals Board, and for alternates representing Oak Grove and Skyline Forest on the NCIP Committee. Applications will continue to be received on an ongoing basis for these roles until the vacancies are filled. Monterey residents are encouraged to learn more and apply for these volunteer positions. Monterey residents interested in receiving notice of board and commission vacancies are encouraged to subscribe to the City’s “Boards and Commissions Interest List.”
Attachment: 1. Application
e: David Stocker
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 193 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 194

Name:
2 MEASURES P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (meets quarterly) reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION (meets 1st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.) advises the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts.

Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE (meets seasonally) directs tourist-generated NCIP dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending projects to Council. Members: One representative and one alternate representing each of the following neighborhoods (check one; you must reside within the jurisdiction, see map):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove–Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte

PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.) advises the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION (meets 2nd and 4th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips) implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on development, zoning, and architectural review issues; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. If the body(s) for which you are applying has qualification requirements, list your specific qualifications. Feel free to attach a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest.

Docusign Envelope ID: 5A0AB397-C9DB-49CC-BC9A-30B5C2081F9A I served on the City of Pacific Grove Planning Commission for 10 years before moving to Monterey. I served on the ARB and Planning commission for the City of Monterey for over 20 years. I served on the building and housing Appeals Board, the Appeals Hearing Board and the disabled access appeals board, concurrently with the Planning Commission. I have been a licensed General Contractor for 50 years, and have owned Stocker and Allaire Inc for 40 years.

David
Stocker
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 195 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 196 Community Services District
Agenda Report
FROM: Christine Davi, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Receive Ocean View Community Services District Quarterly Report (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Community Services District Board of Directors receive a report on the Ocean View Community Services District.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Champion regional and local efforts to secure adequate, affordable, and sustainable water sources for the city, now and into the future.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Community Services District was formed pursuant to Community Services District Law (Government Code section 61000 et seq.,) to own and operate a desalination plant to provide residential and commercial water to the Ocean View Plaza Project (“Project”) located at 457, 465, 470, 484, 565, and 570 Cannery Row.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Monterey approved the Ocean View Plaza Project (“Project”) located at 457, 465, 470, 484, 565, and 570 Cannery Row in June 2004. Subsequently, the City of Monterey requested that the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) review the establishment of a Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 15.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 15., Item Page 1, Packet Page 197 Community Services District (CSD) for the project site that would own, operate, and maintain the proposed desalination plant once constructed.

LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 05-27 on December 27, 2005, approving the formation of this CSD. The Monterey City Council was subsequently appointed as the District Board and must meet quarterly according to requirements of Government Code section 61044.

In November 2019, the California Coastal Commission denied requests for coastal development permit extensions (Permit No. 3-08-013). The Coastal Commission voted that there were changed circumstances from its original coastal development permit issued in 2008 related to water supply and coastal hazards/sea level rise.

In January 2020, Ruby Falls Fund, LLC, sued the Coastal Commission over its denial of the permit extension request as described in Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV000165. That action was stayed pending resolution of the appeals in related litigation regarding the ownership of the property. On May 1, 2023, in an unpublished decision in the Sixth District Court of Appeal, Case Nos. H048978, H049062, H049160, and H049368, the court ruled that the trial court erred in ruling that Canrow Owner, LLC’s foreclosure was wrongful, among other things. In other words, Ruby Falls Fund, LLC is the property owner.

On August 16, 2023, the Monterey County Superior Court lifted the stay in the action against the Coastal Commission. A hearing on the merits of the writ was heard on May 28, 2024 in Department 15 of the Monterey Superior Court. The Court took the matter under submission and issued a ruling on July 11, 2024 granting Ruby Falls Fund, LLC’s petition for writ of mandate. The petition was granted on the basis that the Coastal Commission failed to provide notice of the hearing and staff report of the November 19, 2019 hearing, the Commission failed to exercise its discretion in deciding whether to grant Ruby Falls Fund, LLC’s request for a continuance, and the November 19, 2019 decision based on “changed circumstances” was not reached through a fair hearing conducted as required by law. As of December 4, 2024, it does not appear from the court records that a writ of mandate or judgment has been entered in the case.

The City originally approved the vesting tentative map for the project on June 1, 2004. The City recognizes an extension by operation of law to June 1, 2025, and may be further tolled. cc: Save Our Waterfront, 781 Terry Street, Monterey, CA 93940 Cannery Row Association
LAFCO of Monterey County – Local Agency Formation Committee, POB 1369, Salinas, CA 93902 New Monterey Neighborhood Association
David Balch, Esq.

Anne Mudge, Esq.

Neill Bower, Esq.

Stephanie Lai, Esq.

Aaron Gruber, Esq.

Bob Faulis
William Coffee, Esq.

David Bowie, Esq.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 15., Item Page 2, Packet Page 198 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Appoint Council Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Boards and Committees for 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint Council representatives to outside agencies and City boards and committees for the calendar year 2025.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Charter section 4.5(a)(3) provides: “[t]he Council shall appoint by a vote of three of its members, all members of municipal boards, commissions and committees and representatives of the City to other agencies.” Charter section 4.9 provides: “Councilmembers may be members of the governing body of any board, commission, agency or other intergovernmental agency to which the City is entitled to appoint a representative. A Councilmember shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the City Council.”
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 16.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 1, Packet Page 199 №10/24
projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: None.

DISCUSSION:

In addition to their duties on the City Council, Councilmembers serve on the boards and committees of various outside agencies and City committees as well as a number of internal boards and committees of the City. It has been the Council’s past practice to review these assignments annually and make appointments for the upcoming calendar year. Historically, the Council has distributed outside agency assignments among Councilmembers according to their areas of interest and expertise. Additionally, when Councilmembers are content with their current assignments and the Council is satisfied with its representation, the Council typically reappoints members to the same roles they have held previously.

Staff recommends that the City Council make appointments for 2025 to the outside agencies and City boards and committees, a list of which is included in Attachment 1. The list also includes staff appointments made by the City Manager, which are included in the appointments list for reference only (staff appointments are not made by the City Council).

The 2024 list of appointments is included for reference only as Attachment 2.

CBK
Attachments: 1. 2025 Appointments Worksheet

2. 2024 Appointments (for reference only)
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 2, Packet Page 200 2025 Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Boards and Committee ATTACHMENT 1 Approved [MEETING DATE]
Legend: R = Representative; a = alternate (a1, a2, etc. = 1st alternate, 2nd alternate, etc.); V = Voting Member; L = Liaison/Observer

OUTSIDE AGENCIES

APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL
(stipend, if applicable)
Role Meeting Date/Time
of ea. mo. unless specified
Barber Garcia Rasch Smith Williamson Staff Liaison
(For reference only;
staff is appointed by
the City Manager.)
Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($50/mtg.)
V
2 nd Wed. or as sched.
6:00 p.m. Hill
Cannery Row Business Improvement District
(Contact)
L
2 nd Wed.
8:30 a.m. Sabdo
Central Coast Community Energy
Policy Board (Agendas/Contact)
Seats rotate per MOU between Pacific Grove, Carmel-by-the-Sea, and Monterey (Ag-10560). For the two-year term 1/2025-12/2026, Monterey holds primary representative seats on both boards.

R
4x/yr. and as sched.

Usually 1:30 p.m. Uslar
Community Human Services
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) V
3 rd Thurs.
11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Wyatt
Monterey County Fair
Fairgrounds Subcommittee (Agendas/Contact) L 1x/yr. or as needed. Hill Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Agency
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
V Quarterly on 2nd Mon.
6:00 p.m.

Larson,
Rojanasathira
Monterey County Regional Taxi Authority
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
($50/mtg. plus mileage); MST Administers
V 1x/yr. M. Garcia
Monterey One Water
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($100/mtg. plus mileage) V Last Mon.
6:00 p.m. Hill
Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce
Council of Monterey Business Associations (Contact) L
4x/yr. on a Thurs.
2:00-3:00 p.m. Cole, Uslar
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
Policy Advisory Committee (Agendas/Contact) V As needed Cole Monterey-Salinas Transit
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($100/mtg. plus mileage) V 2 nd Mon.
10:00 a.m.

M. Garcia – a2
Easterling – a3
New Monterey Business Association
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) L
2 nd Thurs.
9:00 a.m. Schmidt
North Fremont Business District
Advisory Committee (Contact) L
2 nd Wed.
9:00 a.m. Buggert
Old Monterey Business Association
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) V
2 nd Wed.
9:00 a.m. Roveri
ReGen Monterey
(formerly Monterey Regional Waste Mgmt. District)
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($100/mtg.; Chair receives add’l $100/mtg.) 4-year term to end 12/2026 even if elected office ends prior to expiration of term. Legislation does not allow for alternates.

V
3 rd Fri. (alt 4th Fri.)
9:00 a.m. Terrasas
Seaside Groundwater Basin Watermaster
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) 2-year term ends 12/2025 V
1 st Wed. or as sched.
2:00 p.m. R a Harty, Hennings
Transportation Agency for Monterey County
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($50/mtg.) V
4 th Wed. or as sched.
9:00 a.m.

M. Garcia – a2
Easterling – a3
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 3, Packet Page 201 2025 Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Boards and Committee ATTACHMENT 1 Approved [MEETING DATE]
Legend: R = Representative; a = alternate (a1, a2, etc. = 1st alternate, 2nd alternate, etc.); V = Voting Member; L = Liaison/Observer

CITY BOARDS AND COMMITTEES

APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL
Meeting Date/Time
of ea. mo. unless specified
Barber Garcia Rasch Smith Williamson Staff Liaison
(For reference only;
staff is appointed by
the City Manager.)
Monterey Conference Center (MCC) Advisory Board 3rd Thurs., or as sched. 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

Uslar,
Hufford
Ocean View Plaza Community Services District Board
($10/mtg.) The City Council serves as the OVPCSD Board of Directors.

Quarterly, as adjourned from
regular Council meetings R R R R R
Subcommittee on Commission Appointments
City representative is the Mayor per Council policy. As needed Klein Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program
(NCIP) Committee As needed Paulding, Harty

OUTSIDE AGENCIES

APPOINTED EXTERNALLY
The City Council does not make these appointments. Any further appointments of City officials made by outside agencies will be added to this section administratively.

Role Meeting Date/Time
of ea. mo. unless specified
Barber Garcia Rasch Smith Williamson Staff Liaison
(For reference only;
staff is appointed by
the City Manager.)
City Selection Committee (Monterey County)
(Agendas/Contact)
City is represented by Mayor (CA Gov Code § 50270).

V Each Jan. and as sched. R n/a
Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
Appointed by the City Selection Committee, comprised of the mayors of each city within the county. Term: May 1, 2023 to May 3, 2027.

V
4th Mon.
3:00 p.m. R Hill
Monterey County Convention & Visitors Bureau
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
City representative is nominated and elected through an application process. Current two-year term ends June 30, 2026.

V
Last Thurs. or as sched.
3:00-5:00 p.m. R Uslar, Hufford

STAFF ACTS AS CITY REPRESENTATIVE, APPOINTED BY CITY MANAGER Access Media Productions – Board of Directors – V, 3rd. Mon. quarterly, 12:00-1:00 p.m. – Huelga Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments – Admin. Committee – V – Cole Authority for California Cities Excess Liability (ACCEL) – Board of Directors – V, Thurs. Quarterly – King Central Coast Community Energy – Operations Board – R – Uslar (see rotation notes above under Policy Board) Coalition of Homeless Service Providers – Board of Directors, Housing Pipeline Committee, Leadership Council – L, as needed – Wyatt Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) Team, formerly Presidio Municipal Services Agency – V, as needed – Uslar, Renny Monterey Bay Defense Alliance – Uslar
Monterey Bay Regional Climate Action Compact – L, as needed – Terrasas Monterey County Integrated Waste Management Task Force – V, as needed – Terrasas Monterey County Mosquito Abatement District – Board of Directors – V, 2nd Tue., or as sched., 12:00 p.m. ($100/mtg.) 2-year 1st term ends Jan. 2, 2026, following terms 4 yrs. – Glass Monterey County Veterans Issues Advisory Committee – V, 4th Thurs. 3:00 p.m. – Ackermann Monterey Peninsula Airport District – L, as needed – Hill Monterey Peninsula Water Management District – Technical Advisory Committee – V, as needed – Cole Transportation Agency for Monterey County – Technical Advisory Committee – V, 1st Thurs. 9:30 a.m. – M. Garcia – R, Easterling – a1, Roveri – a2 Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 4, Packet Page 202 2024 Council-Appointed Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Committees Approved December 5, 2023
Legend: R = Representative; a = alternate; V = Voting Member; L = Liaison/Observer

OUTSIDE AGENCIES, APPOINTED BY COUNCIL
(stipend, if applicable)
Role Meeting Date/Time
of ea. mo. unless specified
Barber Garcia Haffa Smith Williamson Staff Liaison
(FOR REFERENCE
ONLY; APPOINTED BY

CITY MANAGER)
Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($50/mtg. stipend) V 2 nd Wed. or as sched.
6:00 p.m. R Cole
Cannery Row Business Improvement District
(Contact)
L
2 nd Wed.
8:30 a.m. R Roveri
Central Coast Community Energy
Policy Board (Agendas/Contact)
Seats rotate per MOU between Pacific Grove, Carmel-by-the-Sea, and Monterey (Ag-10560). For the two-year term 1/2023-12/2024, Monterey holds alternate seats on both boards.
a
3x/yr. and as sched.
9:00 a.m. a Uslar
Community Human Services
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
V
3 rd Thurs.
11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. a R Wyatt
Monterey County Fair
Fairgrounds Subcommittee (Agendas/Contact)
L 2-3x/yr. as needed R Cole
Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Agency
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
V As needed R a
Rojanasathira,
Larson
Monterey County Regional Taxi Authority
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
($50/mtg. plus mileage); MST Administers
V 1x/yr. R M. Garcia
Monterey One Water
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($100/mtg.) V
Last Mon.
6:00 p.m.
a R Cole
Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce
Council of Monterey Business Associations (Contact)
L
4x/yr. on a Thurs.
2:00-3:00 p.m. R Cole, Uslar
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
Policy Advisory Committee (Agendas/Contact)
V As needed R Cole
Monterey Salinas Transit
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($100/mtg. plus mileage) V 2 nd Mon.
10:00 a.m. a1 R
M. Garcia – a2
Renny – a3
New Monterey Business Association
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
L
1 st Thurs.
9:00 a.m.

R a Buggert
North Fremont Business District
Advisory Committee (Contact)
L
3 rd Wed.
9:00 a.m. R a Schmidt
Old Monterey Business Association
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
V
2 nd Wed.
3:30 p.m. R Sabdo
ReGen Monterey
(formerly Monterey Regional Waste Mgmt. District)
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) ($100/mtg.; Chair receives add’l $100/mtg.) 4-year term to end 12/2026 even if elected office ends prior to expiration of term. Legislation does not allow for alternates.

V
3 rd Fri. (alt 4th Fri.)
9:00 a.m. R Terrasas
Seaside Groundwater Basin Watermaster
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) 2-year term ends 12/2025 V
1 st Wed. or as sched.
2:00 p.m. R a Harty, Hennings
Transportation Agency for Monterey County
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact) $50/mtg. V
4 th Wed. or as sched.
9:00 a.m. a1 R
M. Garcia – a2
Easterling – a3
ATTACHMENT 2 For Reference Only
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 5, Packet Page 203 2024 Council-Appointed Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Committees Approved December 5, 2023
Legend: R = Representative; a = alternate; V = Voting Member; L = Liaison/Observer CITY COMMITTEES, APPOINTED BY COUNCIL Meeting Date/Time Barber Garcia Haffa Smith Williamson Staff Liaison
(FOR REFERENCE ONLY;

APPOINTED BY CITY

MANAGER)
Monterey Conference Center (MCC) Advisory Board 3rd Thurs., or as sched. 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

R a
Uslar,
Hufford
Subcommittee on Commission Appointments
City representative is the Mayor per Council policy. As needed R Klein Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program
(NCIP) Committee As needed R Paulding, Harty
Note: Externally appointed representatives and staff appointments are shown for reference on the following page.

ATTACHMENT 2 For Reference Only
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 6, Packet Page 204 2024 Externally Appointed Representatives to Outside Agencies and City Committees Updated December 5, 2023
Legend: R = Representative; a = alternate; V = Voting Member; L = Liaison/Observer

OUTSIDE AGENCIES, APPOINTED EXTERNALLY
City Council does not make these appointments. Any appointment of a City official made by the City Selection Committee will be added to this section.

Role Meeting Date/Time
of ea. Mo. Unless specified
Barber Garcia Haffa Smith Williamson Staff
(Appointed by City
Manager)
City Selection Committee (Monterey County)
(Agendas/Contact)
City is represented by Mayor (CA Gov Code § 50270)
V
Each Jan. and as
sched.

R
2023 vice
chair
n/a
Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
Appointed by the City Selection Committee, comprised of the mayors of each city within the county. Term: May 1, 2023 to May 3, 2027 V
4th Mon.
3:00 p.m. R Roveri
Monterey County Convention & Visitors Bureau
Board of Directors (Agendas/Contact)
City representative is nominated and elected through an application process. Current two-year term ends June 2024.

V
Last Thurs. or as
sched.
3:00-5:00 p.m.

R Uslar, Hufford

STAFF ACTS AS CITY REPRESENTATIVE, APPOINTED BY CITY MANAGER Access Media Productions – Board of Directors – V, 3rd. Mon. quarterly, 12:00-1:00 p.m. – Huelga Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments – Admin. Committee – V – Cole Authority for California Cities Excess Liability (ACCEL) – Board of Directors – V, Thurs. Quarterly – King Central Coast Community Energy – Operations Board – a – Uslar (see rotation notes above under Policy Board) Coalition of Homeless Service Providers – Board of Directors, Housing Pipeline Committee, Leadership Council – L, as needed – Wyatt Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) Team, formerly Presidio Municipal Services Agency – V, as needed – Uslar, Renny Monterey Bay Defense Alliance – Uslar
Monterey Bay Regional Climate Action Compact – L, as needed – Terrasas Monterey County Integrated Waste Management Task Force – V, as needed – Terrasas Monterey County Mosquito Abatement District – Board of Directors – V, 2 nd Tue., or as sched., 12:00 p.m. ($100/mtg.) 4-year term to end Jan. 2, 2026 – Glass Monterey County Veterans Issues Advisory Committee – V, 4th Thurs. 3:00 p.m. – Ackermann Monterey Peninsula Airport District – L, as needed – Roveri Monterey Peninsula Water Management District – Technical Advisory Committee – V, as needed – Cole Transportation Agency for Monterey County – Technical Advisory Committee – V, 1st Thurs. 9:30 a.m. – M. Garcia – R, Easterling – a1, Roveri – a2 ATTACHMENT 2 For Reference Only
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 16., Item Page 7, Packet Page 205 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan 2024 Update (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, 15306, Class 6)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the ADA Transition Plan 2024 Update by minute action.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The ADA is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including jobs, schools, transportation, and all public and private places that are open to the general public.

Title II of the ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all services, programs, and activities provided by the City. The City must ensure that services, programs, and activities, when viewed in their entirety, are accessible to people with disabilities.

Title II requires public agencies to prepare a plan detailing how it will make its programs, services and activities accessible to disabled individuals. This begins with a self-evaluation which identifies barriers in programs and activities that prevent persons with disabilities from access. The transition plan sets forth the steps necessary to complete modifications identified through the self-evaluation process.

The Transition Plan identifies and prioritizes disable access projects, estimates project costs, highlight an implementation schedule and funding strategy, and grievance and monitoring programs.

It is within the City Council’s purview to review and adopt an ADA Transition Plan, which was most recently updated in 2013.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

Date: 12/17/2024
Item No.: 17.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 1, Packet Page 206 №10/24
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

At its meeting on July 19, 2022, the Monterey City Council awarded a professional services contract with Jensen Hughes, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $212,660 to update the City’s existing ADA Transition Plan. To date, the City has expended $154,158 on efforts to complete the ADA Transition Plan, which includes field surveys and inspection, cost estimates, and development of the ADA Transition Plan database. Funding sources included $100,000 in reappropriated funds from FY 2021/22, $10,000 in CIP Contingency Funds, $60,000 in CIP ADA Improvements (30C1211), and $42,660 in unassigned General Fund fund balance.

Over the past ten years the City has completed over 90 ADA-related infrastructure projects totaling approximately $28 million.

The ADA Transition Plan includes a five-year projection for how the City could fund critical ADA remediation activities. Since the City adopts an annual budget every spring, the adoption of the ADA Transition Plan does not commit the City to the proposed funding plan. However, the City should strive to achieve its ADA Transition Plan by adequately prioritizing and appropriately funding ADA improvements outlined in the plan over future years. The only stable source of funding to begin addressing the over $49.97 million in ADA remediation activities, without cutting existing City services, is to continue utilizing Measure P and S funding for eligible ADA improvements such as curb ramps and traffic signals, utilize the Parking Fund for ADA remediation activities in parking facilities, and consider utilizing Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) funds for all other ADA remediation activities. General Funds are largely committed to funding existing services such as police, fire, recreation, and other programs. The fiscal reality is that without the utilization and prioritization of NCIP funding, City services and programs funded by the General Fund would need to be cut to address these mandatory ADA remediation efforts in City facilities.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15306, Class 6) because the project is an informational study that will ultimately lead to Capital Improvement projects that the City has not yet designed or funded. This update would consist of basic data collection, research, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. Furthermore, the ADA Transition Plan update does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The project is an informational study that will ultimately lead to Capital Improvement projects that the City has not yet designed or funded. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. Cumulative impacts of projects will be considered as capital improvement projects are created.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 2, Packet Page 207 №10/24
Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated as the action involves an update to a plan.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The action involves an update to the Ctiy’s existing ADA Transition Plan; no improvements are proposed at this time.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The impacts to historic resources will be considered as capital improvement projects are created.

Therefore, there would be no impacts to historic or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The ADA was enacted in 1990 to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Therefore, the City Council could choose not to approve the ADA Transition Plan 2024 Update, but that is not recommended.

DISCUSSION:

History of Monterey’s ADA Transition Plans
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal civil rights law originally enacted on July 26, 1990, signed into law by President George H.W. Bush, that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities. Public entities with 50 or more employees, including the City of Monterey, are required to adopt and maintain an ADA Transition Plan. (28 C.F.R. section

35.105.) This plan identifies potential facility, program, service, or practice deficiencies according to current ADA standards. The City’s first Self-Evaluation and ADA Transition Plan was completed in 1994. The most recent ADA Transition Plan adopted by the Monterey City Council was completed in 2013 by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc.

The 2013 Transition Plan identified 34 buildings, 27 parks, 22 parking lots/structures, and approximately 1150 curb ramps and 300 pedestrian signals in need of improvements to meet Federal and State accessibility standards.

Forward Progress on ADA Improvements
Since adoption of the 2013 Transition Plan, the City has made forward progress toward completing the recommended changes.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 3, Packet Page 208 №10/24
Over the past ten years, the City has completed over 90 ADA-related infrastructure projects totaling approximately $28 million, enhancing accessibility across our community. These improvements include:
 68 projects including curb ramps, sidewalk, and pedestrian signal totaling $24.3 million  8 building projects, including upgrades to the Monterey Sports Center, Colton Hall, City Council Chambers and Dry Boat Storage Facility, totaling $2 million  7 parking lot projects, including the Breakwater Lot, Downtown West Garage, and Waterfront Parking Lot, totaling $600,000
 7 park projects including Scholze Park, Veterans Park, Cypress Park, and Dennis the Menace Park, totaling $1.1 million
The 2024 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
The purpose of this current update is to identify and update any gaps in the prior plan and incorporate incremental changes in accessibility regulations and/or City policy/structure that may have occurred over the prior decade. The process included an investigation and document review of the City’s policies, programs, services, and activities, and previously completed plans.

Additionally, where gaps were identified in the Transition Plan, field inspections and updated reports were provided for City facilities and the public rights-of-way. The existing Transition Plan was also updated to include updated scheduling and budgeting information for barrier removal, and to document previously identified items that have since been corrected.

In late 2022, consulting firm Jensen Hughes began facilities analysis, coordination, and a review of City policy, programs, services, and activities. Field surveys and self-evaluation began in 2022 and into 2023. In January and March 2023, public town hall meetings were held in the City Council Chamber and virtually on Zoom for members of the public to provide feedback on the ADA Transition Plan Update. Advertisements for these town hall meetings were placed on the Monterey County Weekly and Monterey Herald, as well as news releases.

From mid-2023 through summer 2024, Jensen Hughes conducted additional field surveys, held meetings with staff, and created a comprehensive database that allows staff to identify, track, and log items that need to be corrected. The new system tracks facilities, pedestrian signals, and curb ramps in one database, identifying the facility type, location, description of the barrier, and barrier remediation cost estimates. Moving forward, staff will be able to keep the database updated to identify what ADA remediation activities have been completed and which activities remain.

Prioritization Criteria for Barrier Mitigation
The relative importance of each barrier according to its impact upon the disabled population was taken into account when developing the prioritization criteria for barrier mitigation.

Overall Prioritization Criteria according to programmatic functions:
 Importance of the program function
 Frequency of Use
 Program location and relation to other programmatic functions Since persons with disabilities utilize certain facilities with greater frequency than other facilities, the impact of barriers identified at those facilities was deemed to be greater. Upon compilation of the survey results, prioritization criteria was determined for barriers identified in the survey and additional information was obtained to determine a final level of prioritization.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 4, Packet Page 209 №10/24
Prioritization Criteria for Facilities according to barrier location is as follows:
 Priority 1. Basic public access and hazardous conditions  Priority 2. Access to program function areas
 Priority 3. Access to public common areas that support program function areas. (such as restrooms, drinking fountains, public telephones, etc.). Provision of visual/audible signal devices connected to the existing fire alarm system
 Priority 4. Barriers not included in priorities 1, 2, and 3 Transition Plan schedule also prioritizes barrier-mitigation within pedestrian routes that serve public entities, including State and local government offices and facilities, transportation, places of public accommodation, and employers, followed by walkways serving other areas.

Prioritization Criteria for PROW according to barrier location is as follows:
 Priority 1 (High). Pedestrian routes serving State and local government offices and facilities
 Priority 2 (Medium High). Pedestrian routes serving important transportation corridors, including pathways leadings to schools.
 Priority 3 (Medium Low). Pedestrian routes serving commercial/business zones and other Title III entities
 Priority 4 (Low). Pedestrian routes serving residential neighborhoods and undeveloped regions.

Infrastructure Investments: Prioritizing ADA Remediation Activities The Transition Plan is an important tool to guide the development and rehabilitation of the City’s Capital Improvement Program and infrastructure needs. As the City’s policymakers, residents, and stakeholders have recognized over the past year, the City’s infrastructure needs are immense, and limited funds and resources are available to complete all of the City’s needs.

ADA improvements and remediation activities, however, should be prioritized over other projects, such as new facilities (unless they replace existing facilities with ADA deficiencies).

One of the requirements of the ADA Transition Plan, as required by 28 CFR 35.150(d), is that the ADA Transition Plan must, among other things, “specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance.” The 2024 ADA Transition Plan includes a five-year projection for how the City could fund critical ADA remediation activities.

For City Facilities, of the 5,438 identified barriers, 679 barriers have been remedied and “Closed” as part of City projects and/or changes in the code that are no longer applicable. The estimated cost of the 4,759 remaining ADA remediation activities in City facilities totals $19.6 million, including $8.9 million for buildings, $1.8 million for parking facilities, and $8.8 million for parks.

These estimates by Jensen Hughes are based on staff or consultant time for labor and materials and do not include the cost of project management or coordination. Furthermore, these costs do not take into account other non-ADA improvements that may be needed in these facilities, such as roofing, plumbing, electrical, flooring, painting, sewer infrastructure, or other rehabilitation needs.

For City curb ramps, of the 1,189 ramps surveyed, a total of 270 items were closed as part of ongoing City street improvement projects. Estimated costs for remediation were also updated as part of this process, and estimate the remaining 919 open items to be approximately $15.4 million.

Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 5, Packet Page 210 №10/24
For City Pedestrian Signals, of the 318 pedestrian push buttons surveyed, a total of 56 items were closed as part of ongoing City street improvement projects. Estimated costs for remediation were also updated as part of this process and estimate the remaining 262 open items to be approximately $15 million.

The grand total cost estimates for remediation activities, including facilities, curb ramps, and pedestrian signals, total $49.98 million.

Because of these needs and funding gaps, to address these federally mandated ADA remediation efforts over the next five years, the ADA Transition Plan proposes utilizing Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) funds for facilities, Parking Fund dollars for parking facilities, and Measure P/S dollars for curb ramps and pedestrian. Staff would follow the NCIP nomination process to make these recommendations formally. The ADA Transition Plan schedules funding for the following major remediation projects for facilities:
 FY 2024-25: Fire Station 12, Fire Station 13, Gordon House, Hilltop Park Center  FY 2025-26: Library, Monterey Sports Center
 FY 2026-27: Cannery Row Parking Garage, East Parking Garage, West Parking Garage, Fire Station 11, El Estero Park Center
 FY 2027-28: Municipal Parking Lots
 FY 2028-29: Colton Hall and Old Monterey Jail, Police and Fire Annex  FY 2029-30: City Hall Complex
As stated earlier, the City’s budget allocations somewhat limit remediation activities for facilities because the General Fund is committed to funding ongoing services and programs, such as public safety, public works, library, and recreation. While projects in parking lots and garages are expected to be funded through the Parking Fund. Curb ramps as well as pedestrian signals would continue to be funded mainly through Measure P/S. NCIP is a potential source of future funding. Without NCIP funds, the City would need to utilize the City’s General Funds to complete these remediation activities, resulting in the reduction of current City services and programs.

Review of Programs, Services, and Activities
The ADA Self-Evaluation included an examination of how programs, services, and activities of the City ensure that access is in place for people with disabilities. The scope of review for the self-evaluations covers 13 program areas, including policies that may exclude or limit participation of qualified persons with disabilities, communications, auxiliary aids and services, emergency management, disability awareness, and etiquette, access to programs and services, policy modifications, public meeting and event access, human resources and disability civil rights, code compliance, staff guidance and training, and anti-discrimination policies. Staff have begun the process of implementing the consultant’s recommendations listed in the draft selfevaluation.

On-Street Parking
The Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) provide design criteria for accessible public pedestrian facilities, including on-street parking, to ensure they are usable by individuals with disabilities. While these guidelines have been in development for several years, they represent the latest recommendations from the U.S. Access Board for making public rightsof-way accessible. It is recommended that the City incorporate the latest guidelines or Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 6, Packet Page 211 №10/24
standards when altering streets and/or providing on-street parking. The City’s 22 off-street parking facilities, such as public parking garages and lots, were assessed.

Leased Facilities
In addition to newly identified buildings, the 2024 ADA Transition Plan Update includes 20 leased facilities and an assessment of accessible routes from site arrival points to building entrances, as well as building entrances and exits. In 2025, the City will complete an assessment of leased facilities’ interior and exterior circulation, including accessible routes and corridors; public use areas, such as restrooms, staff break rooms, lobbies; and other spaces.

This assessment would integrate into the ADA Transition Plan.

The Transition Plan as a Living Document
Staff will continue to update the ADA Transition Plan as remediation projects are completed, organizational processes are updated, and policies change. The updated assessment of leased facilities’ interior is an example. It is truly a ‘living document’ that will be used to improve access to the City’s programs, services, activities, and facilities.

NR
Attachment: 1. ADA Transition Plan 2024 Update
e: Nina Beety, Resident
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 7, Packet Page 212 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update
2024
City of Monterey, California
December 17, 2024

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 8, Packet Page 213 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 2

Table of Contents
Table of Contents 2

1.0 Acknowledgments 5

2.0 Overview of the City of Monterey 5

3.0 Overview of Disability Civil Rights Laws Impacting the City of Monterey 6

3.1 Background Information Regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act and California State Law 7

3.2 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Requirements and Coverage 8

3.3 Who is a Qualified Person with a Disability? 8

3.4 Applicable Federal Requirements 9

3.5 Impact of California State Law 10

4.0 ADA Self-Evaluation - Approach 10

5.0 ADA Self-Evaluation - Methodology and Scope 11

5.1 Methodology 11

5.2 Scope of the Project Organization and Survey Plan 11

5.3 Staff Survey Categories 12

6.0 ADA Self-Evaluation Findings and Recommendations 12

6.1 Administrative Requirements 12

6.1.1 ADA Self-Evaluation, 28 CFR 35.105 12

7.0 ADA Self-Evaluation - Findings 13

7.1 Print Communications 13

7.2 Communication With People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (DHH) 14

7.3 Software & Digital Communication 15

7.4 Staff & Employees 15

7.5 Purchasing, Contracts, Vendors 16

7.6 Construction and Remodels 17

7.7 General Purchases 17

7.8 Facilities and Real Estate Management 18

7.9 Planning, Construction, Buildings 18

7.10 Capital Projects & Fleet Services 18

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 9, Packet Page 214 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 3

7.11 Public Meetings 19

7.12 Emergency Procedures 19

7.13 Police - Custody 20

7.14 Records 21

7.15 Library Services 21

7.16 City Manager 22

7.17 General - Other 22

7.18 Appointment of ADA Coordinator, 28 CFR 35.107 23

7.19 ADA Grievance Procedure, 28 CFR 35.107 23

7.20 ADA Notice of Compliance, 28 CFR 35.106 23

7.21 Policies & Recommendations 23

7.21.1 Policies Review 23

7.21.2 Policy Recommendations 24

7.22 Self-Evaluation Implementation 27

7.23 ADA Self-Evaluation Implementation Plan 27

8.0 ADA Transition Plan 28

8.1 Methodology 28

8.2 Scope of the Project and Survey Plan 29

8.3 Survey Categories 29

8.4 Access Compliance Survey Reports (ACSR) 29

8.4.1 Facilities 29

8.4.1 Leased Buildings / Facilities 33

8.4.2 Public Rights-of-Way 33

8.5 Summary of Findings 34

8.6 On-street Parking 36

8.7 Prioritization Criteria 36

8.8 Transition Plan Implementation 39

9.0 Public Outreach and Participation 39

10.0 Instructions for Maintaining the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Report 39 APPENDICES 41
Appendix A: City of Monterey Notice of ADA Compliance 41 Appendix B: ADA Grievance Procedure for the City of Monterey 42 Appendix C: Self-Evaluation Examples of Survey Responses by Section 43

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 10, Packet Page 215 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 4

Appendix D: Self-Evaluation Work Plan 56
Appendix E: Updated 2024 Access Compliance Survey Reports 57 Appendix F: 2024 Updated Transition Plan Reports 58
Appendix G: Public Outreach Documents 59
Appendix H: Resources 60
Appendix I: Roster of City of Monterey Staff Who Contributed to the Report 63 Appendix J: Revised Final Title II Regulation with Integrated Text 64 Appendix K: California Government Code 12926 121
Appendix L: California Government Code 11135 124
Appendix M: California Government Code 4450 126
Appendix N: 2013 City of Monterey ADA Transition Plan 128 Appendix O: 1994 City of Monterey ADA Transition Plan 129

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 11, Packet Page 216 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 5

1.0 Acknowledgments
The Jensen Hughes team wishes to acknowledge and thank the staff of the City of Monterey for their participation and contribution to the development of the ADA SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan. The staff’s in-depth knowledge and expertise regarding City operations were critical during the reporting process, which allowed our team to perform the necessary evaluation of their programs, services, and activities.

Additionally, the Jensen Hughes team wishes to thank all the Community members who attended public meetings dedicated to the development of this report and the invaluable feedback and perspective they offered. This report aims to ensure that the City has the best possible roadmap to ensure access and inclusion of its constituents, and Community feedback is critical to this process.

2.0 Overview of the City of Monterey
The City of Monterey is a waterfront community where citizens, community organizations, businesses, military partners, nonprofit organizations, and city government work together to ensure that the community retains its hometown identity, high quality of life, and natural beauty. Home to 29,874 residents (United States Census, July 2021 estimate), Monterey is the third-largest city in Monterey County.

Monterey is at the heart of the Monterey Peninsula, serving as the region’s business, financial, government, and services core with urban amenities common to a city of much larger size. Monterey is home to the region’s community college (Monterey Peninsula College), hospital (Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula), largest shopping center (Del Monte Center), largest business park (Ryan Ranch), Monterey County Fairgrounds, the U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey (home of the Defense Language Institute), Naval Support Activity Monterey (home of the Naval Postgraduate School), Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center, Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, Cannery Row, and Monterey Bay Aquarium. Monterey’s waterfront is second to none, featuring Municipal Wharf No. 1 (serving as the region’s commercial fishing hub), Old Fisherman’s Wharf (attracting

3.9 million visitors per year), the Coast Guard Pier, Breakwater Cove, and U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey.

At the same time, the City provides a small-town atmosphere and distinct neighborhoods that range from historic adobes to mid-century modern abodes.

Monterey is proud of its 16 neighborhoods, stretching across the City’s 8.62 square miles, each with its own distinct character. Monterey’s neighborhoods feature a variety

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 12, Packet Page 217 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 6

of offerings: multi-family housing and mixed-use projects, walkability to bodegas and business districts, beachfront neighborhood tracts, large suburban homes, and homes nestled among the Monterey Pine forests.

The City of Monterey maintains and offers a variety of community amenities and services, including the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational trail, over two miles of beaches, a harbor and marina, two wharves, the Monterey Sports Center with two indoor pools, the world-class Monterey Conference Center, California’s first public library, four community centers, 36 dedicated parks and open spaces, three fire stations, one police station, multiple parking facilities and garages, over 100 miles of public streets, the Veterans Park Campground, and El Encinal Cemetery.

First incorporated in 1850 and with its present charter adopted in 1925, Monterey is a charter city and operates under the Council-Manager form of government. The Mayor and City Council are responsible for establishing policy and providing direction to the City Manager. The Mayor and City Council appoint the City Manager, who serves as the city government’s Chief Executive Officer, as well as the City Attorney, who serves as the City’s legal counsel. The City Council members are elected by district and serve staggered four-year terms. The Mayor is elected at-large every two years and presides at City Council meetings.

Monterey is a full-service city, providing police, fire, street operations and maintenance, sewer and storm water utilities, planning, building inspections, engineering, housing, sustainability, facilities maintenance, custodial services, parking, harbor and marina operations, conference center, library, museums, parks, beaches, campgrounds, urban forestry, sports center, cemetery, and recreation services. Internal services include city management, legal, human resources, city clerk, information technology, finance, and property management.

3.0 Overview of Disability Civil Rights Laws Impacting the City of Monterey
The City of Monterey is covered by the ADA Title II, ADAAA of 2008, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and California Government Codes 11135 and 12926. All contractual activities are also covered by California Government Code 4450. Employment programs are covered by the ADA (Title I), the ADAAA, and California Government Code 12926.

Construction activities are covered by California Code 4450. When comparing State and Federal law 28 CFR 35.103, it is mandated that the most stringent law be applied to

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 13, Packet Page 218 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 7

create the maximum amount of access for people with disabilities. Thus, the most stringent standards were applied to the evaluation reported in this document.

3.1 Background Information Regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act and California State Law
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights act that was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush on July 26, 1990. During this signing ceremony, President Bush called for the shameful wall of exclusion to fall. The intent of the ADA is to remove physical or policy-related accessibility barriers to ensure persons with disabilities have access to the full range of elements and participation within American life.

The ADA requires that local governments, including the City of Monterey, take certain affirmative steps to ensure appropriate access for qualified persons with disabilities is in place. This Self-Evaluation Report has been created to ensure that persons with disabilities can readily receive the City's programs, services, and activities.

This effort is engaged in by the City as an ongoing effort to ensure disability civil rights are in place and continuous improvement is realized. To facilitate this process, the City of Monterey retained the services of Jensen Hughes. Jensen Hughes brings disability civil rights expertise to the project to ensure a thorough review is accomplished. The project includes an analysis of all programs, services, and activities evaluated in terms of the City's policies and procedures. The results of this effort are reported in this ADA Self-Evaluation Report. The project also includes an analysis of the built environment from which the City functions. The results of this are reported in the ADA Transition Plan report in this document.

As part of the City’s ongoing commitment and efforts in providing greater accessibility and meeting the requirements of Title II of the ADA, the City of Monterey previously completed Self-Evaluation and Transition Plans in 1994 and 2013. See Appendices N and O.

In 2013, the City completed the more recent ADA Transition Plan Update, identifying 34 buildings, 27 parks, 22 parking lots/structures, and approximately 1150 curb ramps and 300 pedestrian signals in need of improvements to meet Federal and State accessibility standards. Since then, the City has incrementally completed the recommended changes.

The purpose of this 2024 update is to identify and update any gaps in the prior plan and incorporate incremental changes in accessibility regulations and/or City policy/structure

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 14, Packet Page 219 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 8

that may have occurred over the prior decade. The process included an investigation and document review of the City’s policies, programs, services, and activities, and previously completed plans. Additionally, where gaps were identified in the Transition Plan, field inspections and updated reports were provided for City facilities and portions of the public rights-of-way. The existing Transition Plan was also updated to include updated scheduling and budgeting information for barrier removal, and document previously identified items that have since been corrected.

3.2 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Requirements and Coverage Required by 28 CFR 35.105, the ADA Self-Evaluation is a complete examination of all programs, services, and activities provided by the City to ensure that, when viewed in their entirety, they are readily accessible to qualified people with disabilities. The purpose of the ADA Self-Evaluation is to identify areas where changes are needed to ensure access is in place for people with disabilities.

Additionally, the goal of the ADA Transition Plan as required by 28 CFR 35.150, is to inspect and analyze the existing built environment including City buildings, parks, parking lots, and elements within the public rights-of-way that are managed and maintained by the City and develop a plan to remove existing accessibility barriers. To meet the specific requirements of 28 CFR 35.150(d), there are four specific requirements which include the following:
(i) Identify physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities; (ii) Describe in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible;
(iii) Specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance with this section and, if the time period of the transition plan is longer than one year, identify steps that will be taken during each year of the transition period; and
(iv) Indicate the official responsible for implementation of the plan.

3.3 Who is a Qualified Person with a Disability?
To be qualified as a person with disabilities for the purposes of this Self-Evaluation, an individual must have a disability as defined below and must be qualified to participate in the programs, services, or activities of the City.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 15, Packet Page 220 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 9

Under California Government Code 11135, the ADA was incorporated into State law and therefore the ADA issues raised in this Report are both State and Federal issues. In California Government Code 12926, the definition of mental and physical disability was broadened beyond the ADAAA; summarized as follows:

1. A person having a physical or mental disability that limits a major life activity. This person is considered as having unmitigated status (i.e., how the individual in question would function without the use of medication or devices that may mitigate the impact of the disability). If there is a limitation to a major life activity in this statute, coverage is established;

2. A person with a history of a disability as described above;

3. A person is regarded as having a disability, such as described.

California State law also provides protection to cancer survivors, people who have a genetic predisposition to illnesses or disabilities or people who have received services within a special education program.

3.4 Applicable Federal Requirements
The City of Monterey must comply with the following Federal regulations:
28 CFR 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination:
(a) No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any public entity.

To ensure that appropriate access is in place certain evaluations and policy statements are mandated, the City of Monterey must:
● Conduct a self-evaluation to review all programs services and activities, 28 CFR

35.105;
● Produce and disseminate an ADA notice of compliance, 28 CFR 35.106; ● Appoint an employee responsible for coordinating ADA activities, 28 CFR

35.107;
● Have in place an ADA grievance system, 28 CFR 35.107; and; ● Develop an ADA transition plan that reviews the built environment and details how and when access barriers will be mitigated, 28 CFR 35.150(d).

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 16, Packet Page 221 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 10

3.5 Impact of California State Law
When implementing the federal requirements of the ADA, it is critical that a comparison to state law be conducted to ensure that the law that provides the greatest access for persons with disabilities is being applied. 28 CFR 35.103 regulates that the ADA will yield to a stronger local law.

California Government Code section 11135 incorporates ADA requirements, and that, if the laws of state and local governments prescribe stronger protections and prohibitions, the programs and activities shall be subject to the stronger protections and prohibitions.

4.0 ADA Self-Evaluation - Approach
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) within the ADA Title II, Technical Assistance Manual (TAM) (Section II-8.2000) recommends a scope of review for Self-Evaluations which contains 13 program areas which were considered for use in the development of this report. Questions were submitted to the City of Monterey staff in each department regarding each of these 13 program areas. The findings and recommendations are based upon the information provided to Jensen Hughes. The ADA Self-Evaluation Implementation Plan will contain the findings and recommendations, which will come from the City’s responses to the survey questions. These questions were based upon the 13 areas below, which come from the US Department of ADA Title II Technical Assistance Manual II-82000.

1. The ADA Transition Plan; 28 CFR 35.150

2. Policies that may exclude or limited participation of qualified persons with disabilities; 28 CFR 35.130

3. Communications; 28 CFR 35.160

4. Auxiliary aids and services; 28 CFR 35.160

5. Emergency management for persons with disabilities; 28 CFR 35.130

6. Disability awareness, etiquette, and understanding of the requirements the City is held to by City having public contact; 28 CFR 35.130

7. Access to programs, services and activities provided within a bona fide historic site; 28 CFR 35.150

8. Procedure for evaluating the City’s policy modification request and determining fundamental alteration of programs, services or activities; 28 CFR 35.130

9. Access to public meetings and events; 28 CFR 35.130

10.Human resources and disability civil rights; 28 CFR 140 and California Government Code 12926

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 17, Packet Page 222 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 11

11.Procedures to ensure access code compliance within new construction; 28 CFR

35.151

12.Guidance and training needs for City staff; 28 CFR 35.130

13.Anti-discrimination policies relative to former drug users who are clean and have been through rehabilitation; 28 CFR 35.131

5.0 ADA Self-Evaluation - Methodology and Scope

5.1 Methodology
The goal of the self-evaluation is to analyze all programs, services, and activities provided by the City of Monterey. Toward this end, Jensen Hughes worked with the ADA Coordinator and collected information from each City department. Surveys were developed and conducted to obtain information regarding the accessibility of the City’s programs, services, and activities. Additionally, publicly available policies, and policies selected by the City due to their pertinence to the subject matter, were reviewed.

Data collected from these surveys was evaluated by Jensen Hughes and recommendations based upon that data are presented within this report. Action items based on those recommendations were organized into an Implementation Plan for City use. The Implementation Plan provides the City an opportunity to assign tasks to individuals and departments responsible and to track progress. The documents and Plan can also be updated as needed to update the ADA Self-Evaluation as new regulations and programs roll out, or as new case law develops.

5.2 Scope of the Project Organization and Survey Plan
Meetings between Jensen Hughes and City staff took place to define the scope of the project and identify the City’s programs, services, and activities. Surveys were created by Jensen Hughes for each City Department to address a variety of issues within each category listed below. The data developed from the surveys became a basis for the findings and recommendations in the ADA Self-Evaluation Implementation Plan found in this report. The meetings also served as a data-gathering opportunity as Jensen Hughes was able to learn a great deal about the City’s operations while interacting with staff. Public town halls were also conducted with the public to gather initial feedback on the ADA Transition Plan.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 18, Packet Page 223 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 12

5.3 Staff Survey Categories1
- Print Communications
- Communications With People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing - Software and Digital Communications
- Staff & Employees
- Purchasing, Contracts & Vendors
- Construction & Remodels
- General Purchases
- Facilities & Real Estate
- Planning, Construction & Buildings
- Capital Projects
- Fleet Services
- Public Meetings
- Emergency Procedures
- Library & Museum Services
- Custody
- Records
- City Attorney
- General/Other

6.0 ADA Self-Evaluation Findings and Recommendations
The following report and recommendations are based on the Self-Evaluation process and deemed outstanding at the original time of the evaluation in 2022 and 2023.

Note that since 2023, the City may have made significant progress in developing and addressing the original findings stated below and therefore some recommendations may no longer be applicable.

6.1 Administrative Requirements

6.1.1 ADA Self-Evaluation, 28 CFR 35.105
Findings: The City has previously completed two ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition plans: one in 1994, and one in 2013. It was noted that the prior plans focused primarily on the physical barriers relating to City facilities, and less on City programs, services and activities. A contract was initiated in 2022 with Jensen Hughes to create an ADA Self-Evaluation, which is contained within this report, and covers City programs, 1 Copies of all survey questions are contained in this report at Appendix C.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 19, Packet Page 224 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 13

services, and activities. Below are Self-Evaluation survey subject areas with accompanying findings and recommendations.

Recommendation: It is recommended that this Self-Evaluation Report and Recommendations below be adopted and implemented.

6.1.2 ADA Transition Plan, 28 CFR 35.150 (d)
Findings: The City has an existing ADA Transition Plan from the year 2013. In 2022, the City contracted with Jensen Hughes to develop an updated ADA Transition Plan that covers the City facilities and Public Rights-of-Way. The City’s RFP required the vendor to establish a system to track barrier removal, and as part of Jensen Hughes’ contract with the City, an ADA Transition Plan Database has been developed to serve as a uniform procedure to track barrier removal and documenting that new construction and alteration projects and their compliance with the applicable accessibility codes and standards.

Recommendation: It is recommended that the updated ADA Transition Plan be adopted by the Monterey City Council and implemented. The Transition Plan should be revisited and reviewed on a continual basis and be maintained as a living document to reflect changes in resources, scheduling, and tracking of barrier mitigation efforts. Internal procedures should be developed that incorporate the ADA Transition Plan and update the new ADA Transition Plan Database into every City construction project and to barrier removal efforts as completed items. A CASp should be included as part of every City construction project to ensure items in the Transition Plan are addressed as part of a project during the design phase and to verify conformance prior to substantial completion of a project.

7.0 ADA Self-Evaluation - Findings

7.1 Print Communications

SUMMARY
All surveys distributed contained a section regarding the accessibility of that department’s publications and written materials. Because the goal of print materials is to convey critical information to all potential and actual service recipients, all departments should ensure that they are accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 20, Packet Page 225 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 14

Survey questions covered a range of topics, from the physical placement of these materials, to whether printed publications and notices use a certain font type and size.

Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

RECOMMENDATIONS
❏ Ensure that all City printed publications and notices inform readers that the publications are available in alternative formats, if needed, for persons with disabilities.
❏ Ensure that all City printed publications use a uniform, accessible font, and are reviewed to ensure they do not portray people with disabilities in a demeaning or offensive way.
❏ Develop and implement staff training to ensure that all publications and correspondence use “person-first” language.
❏Ensure that all printed publications inform readers that the publications are available in alternative formats, if needed.

7.2 Communication With People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (DHH)

SUMMARY
All surveys distributed contained a section regarding communications with people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Within the U.S., 48 million people are deaf or hard of hearing. Globally, there are 466 million people with disabling hearing loss, that’s 6.1% of the world’s population. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that number could rise to 630 million by 2030, and then to 900 million by 2050. Survey questions covered a range of topics, from captioning to assistive listening devices. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Although “711 the California Relay” is noted on the City’s website, it is also recommended that business cards and letterhead indicate “711 the California Relay” to facilitate accessible communications.
❏ Check to ensure that phone lines are accessible to people who are Deaf or hard of hearing.
❏ Ensure that there is an identified local resource that can provide auxiliary aids for communication as needed.
❏ If videos are used (internally or for the public), ensure that all Departments are informed of resources available to make certain that videos are captioned.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 21, Packet Page 226 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 15

❏ Review to determine if there is a policy in place for securing Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) services and, if not, create and disseminate this policy. ❏ For events and town hall meetings, implement policy to ensure that members of the public can request an American Sign Language interpreter in advance and that they are visible and within the screenshot if television cameras are in use, and that captioning is available as a matter of course.

7.3 Software & Digital Communication
Summary
Most surveys contained a section regarding digital communications and platforms accessibility. For this section, survey questions covered a range of topics, from compliance with current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) to the accessibility of digital communications. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Establish and implement policy that all websites and electronic communications comply with current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1 AA). ❏ Establish how WCAG compliance will be maintained and communicate this expectation across Departments.
❏ Establish and implement policy that all electronic documents (e.g., PDFs, Word Documents and photographs) are accessible to people with disabilities and/or are available in alternative, accessible formats.

7.4 Staff & Employees
Summary
Many surveys contained a section regarding inclusive hiring and employment. For this section, survey questions covered a wide range of topics, from recruitment and interviewing, to the reasonable accommodations process and determination of essential functions of a position. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 22, Packet Page 227 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 16

❏ Consider partnering with local disability rights groups and organizations to affirmatively notify and recruit persons with disabilities to available roles.2 ❏ Establish and disseminate practices to ensure that all job listings are accessible. ❏ Ensure that all job listings contain a statement regarding non-discrimination against persons with disabilities.
❏ Consider implementing methods to offer Staff and Employees an opportunity to self-identify as a person with a disability.
❏ Ensure there is a City-wide process to approve reasonable modifications (i.e. modifications used to create access).
❏ Ensure that the City’s reasonable accommodations process includes a search for transfer into a vacant, funded role as an accommodation of last resort. ❏ Ensure that all facilities managers have a resource to determine the accessibility of their facilities and develop and implement regular processes for the ongoing evaluation of facility accessibility.
❏ Ensure that all Departments have an easily ascertainable policy against disability harassment, as well as a grievance system that offers assistance to people with disabilities who, due to their disability, are not able to independently complete the grievance.
❏ Ensure that the City has a current and easily ascertainable policy regarding service and/or support animals for its employees (and the public).

7.5 Purchasing, Contracts, Vendors
Summary
Many surveys distributed contained a section regarding purchasing, contracts and vendors. For this section, survey questions covered a wide range of topics. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Review whether there is a City policy requiring that accessibility be considered when purchasing new equipment. If not, consider creating, distributing and implementing such a policy City-wide.
❏ Ensure that documents related to bidding and contracting are uniformly (i.e., Citywide) accessible and available in alternative formats. 2 E.g. Abilities Job Fair (https://www.abilities.com/community/job-fair.html), Respectability (https://www.respectability.org/resources/job-seekers-disabilities/); DAV (https://www.dav.org/veterans/employment-resources/).

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 23, Packet Page 228 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 17

❏ Ensure that meetings related to bidding and contracting are uniformly (i.e., Citywide) held in accessible locations. ❏ Ensure that contractual language is uniformly in place (i.e., City-wide) holding contractors and vendors to applicable State and Federal disability civil rights mandates.
❏ Review whether there is a City policy requiring that all products and services offered by third parties and vendors are fully accessible. If not, consider creating, distributing and implementing such a policy City-wide.
❏ Review whether there is a City policy requiring that accessibility plan checks are performed when vendors conduct tenant improvements in public service areas. If not, consider creating, distributing, and implementing such a policy City-wide. ❏ Develop and offer guidance for staff and vendors regarding clear space and furniture placement.
❏ Inform all Departments as to what uniform steps an employee or member of the public with a disability has available if they believe they have been discriminated against by a County vendor or contractor.

7.6 Construction and Remodels
Summary
Some surveys contained a section regarding accessibility standards applied in construction and remodel projects. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Consider creating, disseminating, and implementing a policy requiring CASp inspections at key points of construction and at completion, and before final payments are made.
❏ Review to see whether processes to ensure that persons with disabilities are engaged by the City on major construction projects exist and, if not, develop and implement these protocols.

7.7 General Purchases
Summary
Some surveys contained questions regarding accessibility features in the purchase of items including but not limited to furniture. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 24, Packet Page 229 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 18

Recommendations
❏ Establish a uniform process for ensuring accessibility of items - including furniture and items with operational parts - purchased for installation.

7.8 Facilities and Real Estate Management
Summary
Some surveys contained questions regarding maintenance of accessible features in built environments, as well as accessibility checklists to ensure accessibility during construction. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Consider establishing and utilizing an accessibility construction inspection checklist for use by building code officials/building inspectors as a reference guide to assist with on-site inspection of accessibility features and construction elements affecting accessibility compliance to your facilities. ❏ Review to determine whether there is a current policy ensuring proper maintenance of accessible features and, if not, establish and implement such a policy.

7.9 Planning, Construction, Buildings
Summary
Some surveys contained questions regarding plan review for accessibility in construction and whether there are staff members assigned for such review. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ During construction, consider assigning staff or employees to evaluate construction sites for accessible paths of travel along public rights of way for persons with disabilities.

7.10 Capital Projects & Fleet Services
Summary

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 25, Packet Page 230 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 19

Some surveys contained questions regarding the consideration of accessibility in Capital Projects & Fleet Services. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.3
Recommendations
❏ Consider developing training for Department staff regarding disability awareness and how to ensure access and safety to riders (employees) with disabilities. ❏ Modify service animal policy to include service animals in transportation (for any City-provided transportation services, including the public and employees).

7.11 Public Meetings
Summary
Most surveys distributed contained a section regarding accessible public meetings. For this section, survey questions covered a wide range of topics that were essentially a checklist of best practices for planning and hosting accessible meetings. It is worth noting that these surveys took place in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic. The way we interact with one another, and host meetings continues to evolve at a rapid pace and even the way events are held today may be radically different one year from now. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Create and implement an events accessibility checklist for all Departments that hold public meetings which addresses, at a minimum, the items included within this portion of the Self-Evaluation survey.4
❏ Departments that offer physical education or similar classes, programs or activities should develop protocols to ensure that participants with disabilities are able to be served in an integrated setting, and that there is adaptive equipment available to people with disabilities.

7.12 Emergency Procedures
Summary
Most surveys distributed contained a section regarding emergency procedures relating to evacuation plans and procedures for people with disabilities. For this section, survey 3 Responses for this section are limited as the Capital Projects’ survey questions were only pertinent to the Public Works Department’s programs, services and activities. 4 Checklist for in-person events accessibility: Planning Accessible Meetings and Events Toolkit; Checklist for Accessible Virtual Events, see:
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/disabilityrights/resources/covid-resources/virtual-meetingschecklist/

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 26, Packet Page 231 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 20

questions covered a wide range of topics from the existence and knowledge of building safety and evacuation plans, to best practices for evacuating persons with disabilities in the event of an emergency. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Ensure that all Departments have procedures in place regarding the evacuation of persons with disabilities.
❏ Determine whether there is a Building Safety Plan for the buildings where your department operates.
❏ For vehicles used to transport civilians in any instance, including emergency evacuation incidents, implement a policy and practice of ensuring that these vehicles are equipped to transport persons with disabilities. ❏ Communicate with emergency partners to ensure that any evacuation facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities.

7.13 Police - Custody
Summary
This survey section was distributed to the Police Department only. For this section, survey questions covered a wide range of topics from communication techniques to handling of service animals or medical devices during detention. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏Ensure that first responders and law enforcement are trained regarding: the disability civil rights mandates that the City is held to under State and Federal laws and the best techniques for communication with persons with disabilities (including people with mental disabilities).
❏Ensure that law enforcement personnel are trained in how to safely transport large medical devices such as motorized wheelchairs.
❏Ensure that law enforcement personnel are trained in best practices for dealing with service animals.
❏ With regard to animals of persons involved in arrests, update all policies - including service and emotional support animal policies - to ensure that any animals who may be temporarily sent to Animal Care and Control or any animal shelter are not to be inadvertently euthanized.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 27, Packet Page 232 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 21

7.14 Records
Summary
Some surveys contained questions regarding how records are maintained, and how they are made accessible to people with disabilities. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Develop and implement protocols to ensure the uniform accessibility of City records to persons with disabilities.

7.15 Library Services
Summary
One Department, Library and Museum Services, received survey questions specific to those services. Survey questions covered a wide range of topics, primarily focused on the accessibility of library services and facilities. Below are examples of responses to these questions. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏Ensure that Library Staff are trained in disability awareness, person-first language, and the legal mandates to which the City is held.
❏Ensure that Library Staff are trained in how to assist guests with disabilities. ❏If the Library offers any electronic information systems or resources to its guests, ensure that these systems or resources are accessible to persons with disabilities.
❏Where applicable, ensure that all physical materials (for use by the public) are on accessible routes, are within reach ranges, and have clear space for approach or, minimally, that Staff are situated nearby to provide assistance (and are trained on how to do so). Accessible routes include functioning elevators and clear paths of travel.
❏If the Library offers any software or websites for use by its employees or guests, put measures in place to ensure that this software complies with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.
❏Ensure that the Library has an Emergency Management plan to assist guests or employees with disabilities in the event of an emergency situation (e.g., evacuation, active shooter).

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 28, Packet Page 233 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 22

7.16 City Manager
Summary
The City Manager received a short list of questions regarding training and policies related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏Regularly and proactively offer training regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act, disability awareness, person-first language, and the civil rights legal mandates to which the City is held.
❏Regularly review and update policies regarding implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as accessibility policies and requirements for built and digital environments.

7.17 General - Other
Summary
All Departments received survey questions covering a wide range of general ADA and accessibility related policies, procedures, and practices. Examples of survey responses to this section can be found in Appendix C.

Recommendations
❏ Ensure that all Departments have ADA Notices of Compliance posted. ❏ Ensure that all Departments have access to and are aware of City policies regarding service and/or emotional support animals for its employees and/or the public.
❏ Ensure that all Departments that offer printed informational brochures to the public, and all Departments that issue any sort of fine or citation, have those available in large print format, in accessible locations, and are able to provide alternative formats upon request.
❏ Ensure that all Departments have access to and are aware of City policy that prohibits discrimination against people who formerly used drugs illegally and have been through a rehabilitation program.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 29, Packet Page 234 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 23

7.18 Appointment of ADA Coordinator, 28 CFR 35.107
Findings: The City of Monterey currently has a designated ADA Coordinator.

Recommendation: None.

7.19 ADA Grievance Procedure, 28 CFR 35.107
Findings: The City of Monterey has an ADA Grievance Procedure in place.

Recommendation: Please see the recommendation regarding the City’s Grievance Procedure under Section 7.21.2, “Policy Recommendations”, below. Please also ensure that all City Departments and Leadership are aware of this procedure and publicize its availability to their constituency.

7.20 ADA Notice of Compliance, 28 CFR 35.106
Findings: The City of Monterey has a Notice of ADA Compliance in place.

Recommendation: Per Section 7.21.2, “Policy Recommendations”, below, there are no recommendations regarding this Notice other than to ensure that this document be disseminated broadly to City Departments and Leadership.

7.21 Policies & Recommendations

7.21.1 Policies Review
The following policies were reviewed as part of this Self-Evaluation process:
● ABA-392-PP
● ADA Grievance Form
● ADA Policies and Procedures
● CASp
● City of Monterey Accessibility Statement
● City of Monterey Accommodation Request Form
● City of Monterey ADA Grievance Complaint Form
● Monterey Art. 11 Disability Access Appeals Board
● Purchasing Authorized Signatures List

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 30, Packet Page 235 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 24

● Reasonable Accommodation Request Form
● City Council, Reso No _ 15-052, Title _ Adopt the ADA Curb Ramp and Sidewalk Policy, Mtg Date _ 3_17_2015
● City Council, Reso No _ 15-053, Title _ Adopt ADA Compliance Review Policy, Mtg Date _ 3_17_2015
● City Council, Reso No _ 93-013, Title _ Fully Comply with ADA Act of 1990, Mtg Date _ 1_19_1993
● Disabled Access Appeals Board, Reso No D15-01, Title ADA Curb Ramp Sidewalk Design Exception Policy, Mtg Date 1-29-2015
● Disabled Access Appeals Board, Reso No D15-02, Title ADA Compliance Review Policy for City Projects, Mtg Date 1-29-2015
● FT-RPT New Hire Packet Combo With Uniform Allowance
● PTS New Hire Packet Combo

7.21.2 Policy Recommendations
ABA-392-PP
● Summary: Use of force update document.
● Recommendations: Consider adding best practices discussion on interactions between law enforcement and people with disabilities, especially in the areas of cognitive disabilities and neurodiversity.

ADA Grievance Form
● Summary: Grievance form that sets out procedures for filing a grievance as well as procedural expectations.
● Recommendations: While the form requests grievances be filed within 60 days of the alleged violation, please note that Title II of the ADA does not contain an express statute of limitations.

ADA Policies and Procedures
● Summary: Document requiring review of City owned or funded construction projects for compliance with ADA standards; and outlining procedures for requesting exceptions to accessibility design standards for sidewalks and curb ramps.
● Recommendations: Because the City of Monterey is located in the State of California, and because the California Building Code has, in some instances, accessibility standards that exceed ADA standards, consider updating these policies and procedures to also reference California Building Code standards.

CASp

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 31, Packet Page 236 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 25

● Summary: City document explaining Certified Access Specialist program and benefits.
● Recommendations: Update document with a link to the Division of the State Architect’s information page regarding the CASp program:
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/DSA/Resources/Page-Content/Resources-ListFolder/Certified-Access-Specialist-Property-Inspection.

City of Monterey Accessibility Statement
● Summary: City document describing rights under the ADA and includes links to pertinent information including form to request a reasonable accommodation and CASp (see above).
● Recommendations: None
City of Monterey Accommodation Request or Complaint Form (pdf) ● Summary: Despite the title of the document, this appears to be an online form for filing a grievance only.
● Recommendations: It is not recommended to combine a form for requesting accommodation with a form for filing a grievance. Clarify the title and purpose of the document, and do not combine these two as they involve separate purposes and processes.

City of Monterey ADA Grievance Complaint Form (html)
● Summary: This is the same form as the “Request or Complaint Form (pdf)” described above.
● Recommendations: Same recommendation as for the previous document. Also, ensure that all online forms comply with current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.

Monterey Art. 11 Disability Access Appeals Board
● Summary: City Code section describing the make-up and duties of the City’s Disability Access Appeals Board.
● Recommendations: None
Purchasing Authorized Signatures List
● Summary: A Statement of Access Compliance based on the 2019 California Building Code required to be submitted for all nonresidential alterations or additions to existing buildings.
● Recommendations: Update document to reference the 2022 California Building Code.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 32, Packet Page 237 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 26

Reasonable Accommodation Request Form
● Summary: City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) “Title II ADA Reasonable Accommodation Form”.
● Recommendations: None
City Council, Reso No. 93-013, Title “Fully Comply with ADA Act of 1990, Mtg Date _ 1_19_1993”
● Summary: Unanimously adopted City Council Resolution regarding full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. ● Recommendation: Adopt an updated resolution inclusive of the ADAAA of 2008.

Disabled Access Appeals Board, Reso No D15-01, Title ADA Curb Ramp Sidewalk ● Summary: Unanimously adopted Resolution of the Disabled Access Appeals Board recommending that the City Council Adopt the ADA Curb Ramp Sidewalk Design Exception Policy.
● Recommendation: None
Disabled Access Appeals Board, Reso No D15-02, Title ADA Compliance Review Policy for City Projects, Mtg Date 1-29-2015
● Summary: Unanimously adopted Resolution of the Disabled Access Appeals Board recommending that the City Council Adopt the ADA Compliance Review Policy for City Projects.
● Recommendation: None
City Council, Reso No _ 15-052, Title _ Adopt the ADA Curb Ramp and Sidewalk Policy, Mtg Date _ 3_17_2015
● Summary: Unanimously adopted City Council Resolution recommending that the City Council Adopt the ADA Curb Ramp and Sidewalk Design Exception policy (see Resolution No. D15-01, above)
● Recommendation: None
City Council, Reso No _ 15-053, Title _ Adopt ADA Compliance Review Policy, Mtg Date _ 3_17_2015
● Summary: Unanimously adopted Resolution of the Council Adopting an ADA Compliance Review Policy for City Projects (see Resolution No. D15-02, above) ● Recommendation: None
FT-RPT New Hire Packet Combo With Uniform Allowance
● Summary: Checklist and information for new FT-RPT employees.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 33, Packet Page 238 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 27

● Recommendations: For the section entitled “Employee Survey - EEO-4 Reporting (pps. 5-7 of the pdf), replace the word “Handicapped” with “Disabled or Person with a Disability”. Also, refer to the definition of “disability” as provided by the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S. Code § 12102) as well as the Rehabilitation Act. If this Self-ID reporting is strictly for the EEOC (federal), this will be sufficient amendment. If this Self-ID reporting is for City or State records, also include the definition of disability (see California Government Code Section 12926).

PTS New Hire Packet Combo
● Summary: Checklist For New PTS Employees
● Recommendation: Same recommendations for FT/RPT employees, see above.

7.22 Self-Evaluation Implementation
To move forward in a positive and productive manner the following is recommended:

1. The City of Monterey should develop internal work teams to address the items found needing attention by the review;

2. The internal work team should receive training to ensure that their work product is well focused and effectively addresses the required changes they are assigned to implement;

3. A work plan should be adopted for the purpose of assigning tasks internally and tracking progress of ADA implementation efforts;

4. A system should be designed and implemented to communicate to all City staff the changes that are being created through this process and why City staff are responsible for addressing within the scope of their duties;

5. Training recommendations are also noted in the Implementation Plan.

7.23 ADA Self-Evaluation Implementation Plan
Associated with this report is a spreadsheet which contains the ADA self-evaluation implementation plan. This plan is intended to be used to track the various action items that have been identified within the self-evaluation process. Action items from the administrative requirements and the 13 program areas/survey areas discussed above are incorporated in the spreadsheet. The ADA Coordinator can use this document to assign departments or individuals the task of implementing the action items, establish due dates, review progress, and make notes about the status of the work being

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 34, Packet Page 239 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 28

addressed. Should the need arise, this document can demonstrate the good faith effort being made by the City of Monterey to address disability civil rights issues.

It’s very important to note that each time an entry to the spreadsheet is made, the “as of date” must be updated. This will serve as a reflection of current status and ongoing effort.

8.0 ADA Transition Plan

8.1 Methodology
The goal of the Transition Plan is to survey and analyze the City’s existing facilities and infrastructure which include elements serving the public rights-of-way in order to meet the specific requirements of 28 CFR 35.150(d) which includes the following:
(i) Identify physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities; (ii) Describe in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible;
(iii) Specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance with this section and, if the time period of the transition plan is longer than one year, identify steps that will be taken during each year of the transition period; and
(iv) Indicate the official responsible for implementation of the plan.

The City’s accessibility features were evaluated specifically against the federal code requirements of Title II of the ADA (2010 ADAS) and State code requirements of Chapter 11B of the 2022 California Building Code (CBC).

For the public rights-of-way, in addition to the 2010 ADAS and CBC, the Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way (PRoWAG) Published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2023, and the CAMUTCD are also referenced.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 35, Packet Page 240 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 29

The emphasis of the survey is to identify non-compliant barriers, provide solutions with associated cost estimates for remediation and provide recommendations for prioritizing remediations.

8.2 Scope of the Project and Survey Plan
Meetings between Jensen Hughes and City management took place to define the scope of the project and identify the City’s existing facilities. Readily available plans of existing facilities and a list of streets were provided to Jensen Hughes in preparation of the field surveys. The data collected from the surveys became a basis for the ADA Transition Plan found in Appendix F (Updated 2024 Access Compliance Survey Reports).

8.3 Survey Categories
Access Compliance Survey Reports are separated into the below categories.

City properties and facilities:
● Buildings / Facilities
● Parks
● Parking Lots
Public Rights-of-Way:
● Curb ramps
● Pedestrian signals
The Access Compliance Survey Reports (ACSR) will assist the City in prioritizing barrier remediation and anticipating future costs for such remediation by providing a structure and plan to bring the City up to ADA compliance through a yearly allocation of funds to perform upgrades and/or barrier mitigation projects, starting with projects that remediate identified accessibility barriers with the most exposure to the public and their employees, while working through the minor issues over time.

8.4 Access Compliance Survey Reports (ACSR)

8.4.1 Facilities
The 2013 ADA Transition Plan Update included 36 buildings, 27 parks, and 22 parking lots/structures.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 36, Packet Page 241 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 30

Inspection
Year Facility Type Facility # Facility Name
2013 Parking Lots 1 Waterfront West
2013 Parking Lots 2 Waterfront East
2013 Parking Lots 3 Lot 3
2013 Parking Lots 4 Lot 4
2013 Parking Lots 5 Lot B
2013 Parking Lots 6 Entrance Wharf I
2013 Parking Lots 7 Lot 7 Calle Principal Parking Garage 2013 Parking Lots 8 Lot 8
2013 Parking Lots 10 Lot 10
2013 Parking Lots 11 Lot 11
2013 Parking Lots 12 Lot C
2013 Parking Lots 13 Lot CR7
2013 Parking Lots 14 Lot 14
2013 Parking Lots 17 Breakwater Lot
2013 Parking Lots 18 Lot 18
2013 Parking Lots 21 Lot 21
2013 Parking Lots 23 Depot Lot (East)
2013 Parking Lots 24 Lot 24
2013 Parking Lots 27 Depot Lot (West)
2013 Parking Lots 29 Cannery Row Parking Garage
2013 Parking Lots 30 East Parking Garage
2013 Parking Lots 31 West Parking Garage
2013 Buildings 101 Scholze Park Center
2013 Buildings 102 Corporation Yard
2013 Buildings 103 Building Maintenance Presidio of Monterey (POM) Shop 2013 Buildings 104 Cannery Row Fishing Shack
2013 Buildings 105 Cemetery Office
2013 Buildings 108 City Hall Complex
2013 Buildings 108.1 Old Monterey Jail & Colton Hall
2013 Buildings 109 Conference Center
2013 Buildings 110 Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce 2013 Buildings 111 Pacific Biological Laboratories
2013 Buildings 112 Employee Lounge
2013 Buildings 113 Police and Fire Annex
2013 Buildings 113.1 Fire Administration
2013 Buildings 114 Fire Station No. 11
2013 Buildings 115 Fire Station No. 12
2013 Buildings 116 Fire Station No. 13
2013 Buildings 117 Gordon House
2013 Buildings 118 Harbormaster's Office
2013 Buildings 119 Harbor Storage Facility
2013 Buildings 120 Housing and Property Management
2013 Buildings 123 Ketcham House

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 37, Packet Page 242 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 31

2013 Buildings 124 Library
2013 Buildings 125 Waterfront Community Room and Public Restrooms 2013 Buildings 128 Lower Presidio Museum
2013 Buildings 129 Osio Rodriguez Adobe
2013 Buildings 134 Vasquez Adobe Building
2013 Buildings 136 Monterey Sports Center
2013 Buildings 137 Wharf I
2013 Buildings 138 Wharf II
2013 Buildings 139 City Offices
2013 Buildings 140 El Estero Park Center
2013 Buildings 141 First French Consulate
2013 Buildings 143 Cannery Row Parking Garage Office
2013 Buildings 144 Casanova Oak Knoll Park Center
2013 Buildings 145 Hilltop Center
2013 Buildings 147 Public Works Annex
2013 Parks 1001 Archer Park
2013 Parks 1004 Casanova Oak Knoll Park
2013 Parks 1005 Cypress Park
2013 Parks 1006 Deer Flats Park
2013 Parks 1007 Don Dahvee Park
2013 Parks 1008 El Estero Park Complex
2013 Parks 1010 Peter J. Ferrante Park
2013 Parks 1011 Fisherman Flats Park
2013 Parks 1012 Hilltop Park
2013 Parks 1013 Hoffman Park & Playground
2013 Parks 1014 Jacks Ballpark
2013 Parks 1016 Laguna Grande Regional Park
2013 Parks 1017 Laguna Grande Court Park
2013 Parks 1019 Larkin Park
2013 Parks 1021 Montecito Park
2013 Parks 1022 Monterey Bay Park
2013 Parks 1023 Oak Newton Park
2013 Parks 1024 Quarry Park
2013 Parks 1027 Ryan Ranch Park
2013 Parks 1028 San Carlos Beach Park
2013 Parks 1029 Scholze Park
2013 Parks 1030 Fisherman's Shoreline Park
2013 Parks 1031 Soldier Field
2013 Parks 1032 Spray Avenue Tot Lot
2013 Parks 1033 Veterans Memorial Park
2013 Parks 1034 Via Paraiso Park
2013 Parks 1035 Whispering Pine Park

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 38, Packet Page 243 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 32

For the 2024 update, newly identified buildings and areas were surveyed and added to the Transition Plan including leased facilities. The Facilities included the following:

Inspection
Year Facility Type Facility # Facility Name
2023 Parking Lots 23.1 Depot Lot East - Monterey Bay Kayaks 2023 Parking Lots 27.1 Depot Lot West - Dust Bowl Tap Room 2023 Parking Lots 32 Monterey Bay Lot 7
2023 Parking Lots 33 Del Monte Beach Access & Parking Lot 2023 Buildings 110.1 Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce - 2023 2023 Buildings 129.1 Osio-Rodriguez Adobe Business Entrances 2023 Buildings 137.1 Wharf I Leased Entrances
2023 Buildings 137.2 Wharf I Leased Entrances
2023 Buildings 137.3 Wharf I Leased Entrances
2023 Buildings 137.4 Wharf I Leased Entrances
2023 Buildings 138.1 Wharf II Leased Entrances
2023 Buildings 143.1 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Ste 100. 2023 Buildings 143.2 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances 2023 Buildings 143.3 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances 2023 Buildings 143.4 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances 2023 Buildings 143.5 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances 2023 Buildings 150 150 Del Monte Avenue
2023 Buildings 151 Casa de la Estrella Apartments
2023 Buildings 152 English Apartments - Unit 19
2023 Buildings 201 Mohr Imported Cars
2023 Buildings 202 Monterey Beach Station
2023 Buildings 203 Waterfront East - Leased Restaurant Building 2023 Parks 1001.1 542 Archer Park Center - First Night Monterey 2023 Parks 1008.1 El Estero - Frank E. Sollecito Ballpark 2023 Parks 1008.2 El Estero Parking Lot
2023 Parks 1008.3 El Estero Boating
2023 Parks 1014.1 Monterey Tennis Center
2023 Parks 1030.1 Beach Parcel West of Fisherman’s Wharf 2023 Parks 1036 Monterey Museum of Art Park
2023 Parks 1037 Spanish Park/Plaza
As a part of the ACSR effort, areas and site features surveyed for each facility include:
● Accessible routes from site arrival points to building entrances ● Building entrances and exits
● For City owned and operated facilities, interior and exterior circulation, including accessible routes and corridors; public-use and common-use areas, such as

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 39, Packet Page 244 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 33

restrooms, staff break rooms, lobbies, etc.; employee work areas; and assembly spaces, such as meeting rooms, and event spaces
● Outdoor activity areas, such as athletic fields, pools, and playgrounds

8.4.1 Leased Buildings / Facilities
When a Title II public entity leases building space to a Title III private business, both parties have obligations under the ADA to ensure accessibility for individuals with disabilities. The public entity, as the building owner, must ensure the areas of public accommodation in the leased structure and common areas under its control comply with the applicable accessibility standards, including accessible entrances, parking, and routes of travel. Lease agreements should include provisions requiring the private business to meet its Title III obligations, such as providing access to goods and services, removing barriers within the leased space when readily achievable, and ensuring effective communication. Both parties may share responsibility for accessibility compliance depending on the lease terms, areas of public accommodation, and areas of control. Any alterations to the property must meet accessibility requirements, and collaboration between the public entity and private business is essential to ensure seamless accessibility throughout the premises.

In contrast to the foregoing, when the City leases land and does not own the building on the land that houses the private business, the City has no ability or right to modify the building in any way and it is not responsible for the failure of the private owner of the building to comply with Title III.

8.4.2 Public Rights-of-Way
The surveys conducted in the field of the public rights-of-way include 1,189 curb ramps/islands, and 318 pedestrian signals within City boundaries and directly adjacent to City facilities.

Where an accessibility barrier was identified, the following information was collected about the barrier and its proposed remediation and compiled as part of an Access Compliance Survey Report (ACSR):

1. Locational information, including street intersection and orientation

2. Description of the applicable standard that is being opposed

3. As-built description/measurement of the barrier

4. Proposed solution/remediation method of the barrier

5. Relevant 2010 ADAS and/or 2022 CBC code references along with PRoWAG.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 40, Packet Page 245 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 34

6. Cost estimate information including Quantity, Units, Unit Cost, and Total Cost

7. Photo of the barrier at the time of the assessment (for 2022/2023 added reports only)
The above information, as well as additional information, will be maintained on an ACSR database and/or excel spreadsheet which will be GIS compatible and maintained by the City. The plan will be used in efforts to record, monitor, and track projects for remediating ADA challenges.

8.5 Summary of Findings
Based on the findings, the City has made some progress in its barrier remediation goals over the past decade and continues to strive toward providing greater access to both its constituents and visitors. One of the main challenges identified is a need for accurate record keeping for City construction projects as it relates to accessibility and then tying this information back into the transition plan. Based on the information provided by the City and from field sampling, updates were made to the 2013 Transition Plan, and new inspections were added. Cost estimates were also carefully reviewed and updated to get a better understanding of future budgeting for barrier removal and to develop the updated Transition Plan.

For City Facilities, of the 5,438 identified barriers, 679 barriers have been remedied and “Closed” as part of City projects and/or changes in the code that are no longer applicable. Estimated costs for remediation were also updated as part of this process, and it is estimated the remaining 4,759 open items are approximately $19,577,820, and the estimated costs spent/or saved towards closed items are $2,088,274.

With the collected data, a Transition Plan was developed based on the highest priority facilities and available funding sources. It will be the City’s responsibility to update the Transition Plan annually and continue with assigning projects to any of the remaining items.

Barrier Remediation Project Fiscal Year Funding Source Estimated Project Costs
Barrier Remediation Projects 2024-2025 FY 24/25 General Funds / NCIP $445,053.00 Barrier Remediation Projects 2025-2026 FY 25/26 General Funds / NCIP $1,317,399.00 Barrier Remediation Projects 2026-2027 FY 26/27 General Funds / NCIP $2,557,881.00 Barrier Remediation Projects 2027-2028 FY 27/28 General Funds / NCIP $951,012.00 Barrier Remediation Projects 2028-2029 FY 28/29 General Funds / NCIP $809,391.00 Barrier Remediation Projects 2029-2030 FY 29/30 General Funds / NCIP $1,137,761.00

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 41, Packet Page 246 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 35

TBD TBD TBD $12,359,323.00
Total $ 19,577,820.00
The full Transition Plan’s findings and recommendations are included as Appendices E and F to this Report.

For the public rights-of-way, a similar approach was used to identify closed items and to update the Transition Plan.

For City curb ramps, of the 1,189 ramps surveyed, a total of 270 items were closed as part of ongoing City street improvement projects. Estimated costs for remediation were also updated as part of this process, and estimate the remaining 919 open items to be approximately $15,413,400 and the estimated costs spent towards remediation (Closed) items to be $4,617,000.

A Transition Plan was developed based on the highest priority areas and projects that are already scheduled.

Project Year Project Name Cost Estimate
2024 CW RR Ph 4 $ 36,000.00
2024 CW RR Ph 6 $ 64,000.00
2025 Curb Ramps at Prescott / Lottie $ 74,000.00
2025 CW Curb Ramps Ph 8 $ 108,000.00
2025 CW Curb Ramps Ph 9 $ 240,000.00
2025 CW RR Ph 5 $ 238,000.00
2025 CW Signals 3A $ 114,000.00
2025/26 CW Curb Ramps Ph 10 $ 440,000.00
2026 CW Curb Ramps Ph 11 $ 148,000.00
2026 CW Signals Fremont/Abrego & Aguajito Glenwood $ 192,000.00 2027 CW Curb Ramps (Future Phase) $ 228,000.00
2027 CW Signals 3B $ 204,000.00
2029 CW Signals Ph 4 $ 570,000.00
2029 CW Signals Ph 5 $ 624,000.00
TBD TBD $ 12,133,400.00
Total $ 15,413,400.00
For City Pedestrian Signals, of the 318 pedestrian push buttons surveyed, a total of 56 items were closed as part of ongoing City street improvement projects. Estimated costs for remediation were also updated as part of this process, and estimate the remaining 262 open items to be approximately $14,985,250 and the estimated costs spent towards remediation (Closed) items to be $2,786,000.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 42, Packet Page 247 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 36

A Transition Plan was developed based on the highest priority areas and projects that are already scheduled.

Project Year Project Name Cost Estimate
2026 CW Signals Fremont/Abrego & Aguajito Glenwood $ 476,000.00 2027 CW Signals 3B $ 210,000.00
2029 CW Signals Ph 4 $ 2,303,000.00
2029 CW Signals Ph 5 $ 2,348,500.00
TBD TBD $ 9,647,750.00
TOTAL $ 14,985,250.00
The Inspections did not include all intersections and primarily focused on arterial and connector streets. In addition to the projects identified in the Transition Plan, there may be additional projects and intersections that are scheduled or have occurred that included additional street and accessibility upgrades.

The grand total cost estimates for remediation activities, including facilities, curb ramps, and pedestrian signals, total $49,976,470.

8.6 On-street Parking
The Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) provide design criteria for accessible public pedestrian facilities, including on-street parking, to ensure they are usable by individuals with disabilities. While these guidelines have been in development for several years, they represent the latest recommendations from the U.S. Access Board for making public rights-of-way accessible.

It is recommended that the City incorporates the latest guidelines or standards when altering streets and/or providing on-street parking.

Additionally, a formal process should be in place to accommodate residents and business owners to request accessible on-street parking where none is provided.

8.7 Prioritization Criteria
The relative importance of each barrier according to its impact upon the disabled population was taken into account when developing the prioritization criteria for barrier mitigation.

Overall Prioritization Criteria according to programmatic functions:

• Importance of the program function

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 43, Packet Page 248 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 37

• Frequency of Use
• Program location and relation to other programmatic functions Since persons with disabilities utilize certain facilities with greater frequency than other facilities, the impact of barriers identified at those facilities was deemed to be greater.

Upon compilation of the survey results, prioritization criteria were determined for barriers identified in the survey, and additional information was obtained to determine a final level of prioritization.

Prioritization Criteria for Facilities according to barrier location:

Priority 1. Basic public access and hazardous conditions Priority 2. Access to program function areas
Priority 3. Access to public common areas that support program function areas. (such as restrooms, drinking fountains, public telephones, etc.). Provision of visual/audible signal devices connected to the existing fire alarm system Priority 4. Barriers not included in priorities 1, 2, and 3 The prioritization of barrier mitigation within the City buildings and parks followed a 2- step process:
• Priorities 1 through 4 were assigned to each record or barrier identified (as described above)
• Priority numbers were assigned to each of the City parks, parking lots and buildings surveyed.

Within the public rights-of-way (PROW), where the City has sole responsibility/authority over streets, roads and walkways, the ADA Transition Plan references the City’s Pavement Management Plan and Street Resurfacing Program schedule for providing curb ramps or mitigating barriers in pedestrian sidewalks. Curb ramp upgrades or mitigating barriers will be included as part of the scope of major rehabilitation roadway projects involving pavement overlay projects.

In addition, the Transition Plan schedule prioritizes barrier-mitigation within pedestrian routes that serve public entities, including State and local government offices and

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 44, Packet Page 249 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 38

facilities, transportation, places of public accommodation, and employers, followed by walkways serving other areas.

Prioritization Criteria for PROW according to barrier location:

Priority 1 (High). Pedestrian routes serving State and local government offices and facilities
Priority 2 (Medium High). Pedestrian routes serving important transportation corridors, including pathways leadings to schools.

Priority 3 (Medium Low). Pedestrian routes serving commercial/business zones and other Title III entities
Priority 4 (Low). Pedestrian routes serving residential neighborhoods and undeveloped regions.

For barriers within the public rights-of-way, a three-pronged approach to implementation is recommended:

1. The Public Works Department would work with the public bus fixed route service provider, Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST), to recommend the placement of bus stops that serve City facilities along accessible routes. The City could also work to promote MST Rides, a paratransit program provided to people with disabilities who cannot access fixed route bus stops.

2. The Public Works Department would continue to identify street sections being resurfaced over the next few years and identify curb ramps that are not compliant with current ADA standards. These identified curb ramps will continue to be scheduled for upgrade to applicable standards when part of a major roadway rehabilitation project involving pavement overlays.

3. The Public Works Department would continue to process and review citizen requests for barrier removal and coordinate with the City’s ADA Coordinator.

It is recommended that the City adopt a formal policy and procedure for the Public Works Department to coordinate when responding to curb ramp upgrades or other sidewalk barrier-removal requests from City residents.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 45, Packet Page 250 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 39

8.8 Transition Plan Implementation
To effectively implement and maintain an existing ADA Transition Plan, it is essential to begin by thoroughly and regularly reviewing the plan to ensure compliance with the most current ADA standards and regulations. Identified accessibility barriers should be prioritized based on factors such as severity, impact on users, and resource availability.

A clear timeline must be established, and necessary funding allocated to address these priorities systematically. Every construction or alteration project should start by referencing the transition plan and be documented upon completion to reflect any changes. Engaging with stakeholders—including individuals with disabilities, community members, and staff is crucial for gathering feedback and fostering transparency.

Regular monitoring of progress through measurable goals and periodic evaluations is necessary to ensure adherence to the plan. Comprehensive documentation of all modifications and updates should be maintained, and the plan should be adjusted as needed to reflect any changes in facilities, policies, or legal requirements, thereby ensuring continuous compliance with ADA obligations.

9.0 Public Outreach and Participation
To encourage public participation and involvement with the City of Monterey’s ADA SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan development process, in-person and public video teleconference meetings were held on January 26, 2023, and March 15, 2023.

To maximize outreach and encourage participation, the City was encouraged to reach out to various local organizations and nonprofit groups and also posted the below notices on the City’s website and the City’s public engagement platform, Have Your Say Monterey. In addition, advertisements to promote the ADA Transition Plan Town Halls was placed on the Monterey County Weekly calendar on March 3, 2023 and in the Monterey Herald on March 12, 2023. A news release for the event was posted and shared with the City’s media distribution list and posted on the City’s website on March 7, 2023.

See Appendix G for the City of Monterey ADA Transition Plan Town Hall Summary

10.0 Instructions for Maintaining the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Report
It is not possible to accurately predict program changes within the City of Monterey, the development of ADA case law, or the content of revised regulations, which are yet

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 46, Packet Page 251 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 40

unpublished. Despite this, the City of Monterey has an ongoing responsibility to remain compliant with disability civil rights mandates.

To facilitate this process this, the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan report is designed to accommodate revisions as conditions change. Thus, the City can make changes as needed and maintain a current Transition Plan. This document can serve as a tool to ensure compliance, evidence of the City’s good faith effort, and a historic document to record the actions taken by the City of Monterey to appropriately serve the growing population of persons with disabilities living in the community.

To make the necessary amendments as changes occur, the ADA coordinator can merely place an addendum in the narrative under the impacted 13 areas enumerated above and can also be made to the Self-Evaluation Implementation Plan within the associated spreadsheet. From that point, action to implement changes can be structured, documented and documented, and tracked.

For the ADA Transition Plan, the ADA Coordinator can place an addendum in the narrative and can also be made to the Transition Plan within the database which was provided in an excel spreadsheet and/or GIS file.

It is vital for the City to set up a process and procedure for tracking progress and implementation in order to keep the ADA Self-evaluation and Transition Plan current and up to date.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 47, Packet Page 252 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 41

APPENDICES
Appendix A: City of Monterey Notice of ADA Compliance
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 48, Packet Page 253

HOME CITY HALL CITY MANAGER ACCESSIBILITY
Accessibility
Notice Under The Americans With Disabilities Act: If you are a person with a disability and require an accommodation to participate in a City program, service or activity, requests for accommodations may be made by calling (831) 646-3760 (voice), 7-1-1 (California Relay Service), or by email at [email protected], at least 30 hours in advance of the event. Copies of documents are available in alternative formats, upon request. We make every effort to adhere to 508 requirements as set forth by the W3C Accessibility Initiative. Ongoing validation testing is conducted using industryrecognized tools for coding and usability.

BACKGROUND
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted on July 26, 1990, provides comprehensive rights and protections to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, state and local government services, public accommodations, and telecommunications. The ADA Title II prohibits all state and local governments from discriminating on the basis of disability, but moreover, its goal is to promote equality of opportunity and full participation.

The City of Monterey works to ensure that every program, service, benefit, activity and facility operated or funded by the City of Monterey is accessible to, and useable by, people with disabilities.

The City continually strives to eliminate barriers that may prevent persons with disabilities from access to or participation in City programs, services, activities, and facilities.

If you would like to request a reasonable accommodation for access to City facilities, services, activities, and programs please complete and submit the Request for Accommodation Form. If you cannot fill out the form or require assistance to do so, please contact the City's ADA Coordinator, (831) 646-3760.

Statement of Access Compliance
Certified Access Specialist program (CASp)
Request for Accommodation Form (format options):

Online Form - fill out online
MS Word - downloadable
Adobe PDF - downloadable

DISABILITY ACCESS AT MEETINGS
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible.
12/9/24, 4:36 PM City of Monterey, CA
https://monterey.gov/city_hall/city_manager/accessibility/index.php 1/2

APPENDIX A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 49, Packet Page 254 DIAL 7-1-1
For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use
the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanishlanguage services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND FORM
Grievance Procedure
This Grievance Procedure is established to meet the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). It may be used by anyone who wishes to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, activities, or programs by the City of Monterey. A written grievance should be filed on the ADA Grievance Form included below. If the grievance is not filed on the Grievance Form, it should nonetheless be in writing and contain information about the alleged discrimination such as name, address, phone number of the grievant and location, date, and description of the problem. Alternative means of filing grievances, such as a tape recording or personal interviews will be made available upon request. The grievance should be submitted and signed by the grievant or their designee as soon as possible, but no later than 60 calendar days after the alleged violation to the City of Monterey ADA Coordinator listed below.

The form is available in the formats linked below. If you need the form in an alternative format other than provided, please contact the ADA Coordinator at (831) 646-3890.

Grievance Form (format options):

Online Form - fill out online
MS Word - downloadable
Adobe PDF- downloadable
Search for file name:
search here
ADA Transition Plan and Agenda Reports
12/9/24, 4:36 PM City of Monterey, CA
https://monterey.gov/city_hall/city_manager/accessibility/index.php 2/2

APPENDIX A
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 50, Packet Page 255 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 42

Appendix B: ADA Grievance Procedure for the City of Monterey Grievance Procedure Under ADA or
California State Disability Civil Rights Laws
https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/City%20Hall/City%20Manager/Accessibility/ADA -Grievance-Form.pdf

APPENDIX B
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 51, Packet Page 256

CITY OF MONTEREY
Grievance Procedure Under
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
The following grievance procedure has been established by the City of Monterey to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). This Procedure may be used by anyone who wishes to file a grievance with the City of Monterey alleging discrimination on the basis of a disability in the provision of its programs, services, or activities.

A written grievance should be filed on the ADA Grievance Form attached hereto. If the grievance is not filed on the Grievance Form, it should nonetheless be in writing and contain information about the alleged discrimination such as name, address, phone number of the grievant and location, date, and description of the problem. Alternative means of filing grievances, such as a tape recording or personal interviews will be made available upon request. The grievance should be submitted and signed by the grievant or their designee as soon as possible, but no later than 60 calendar days after the alleged violation to the City of Monterey ADA Coordinator listed below.

Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the grievance, a City of Monterey representative will contact the grievant to discuss the grievance. The City of Monterey representative will respond to the grievant in writing within 60 calendar days after the receipt of the grievance. The format of response, if requested, can be in an accessible format such as large print, Braille or audio tape.

If the response by the City of Monterey does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the grievant or their designee may appeal the decision to the City of Monterey Disabled Access Appeals Board within 15 calendar days after the date of the written response by the City. The request for an appeal shall be submitted in writing to the ADA Coordinator. The appeal shall be scheduled for the next available Disabled Access Appeals Board meeting. If the grievant is dissatisfied with the response of the Disabled Access Appeals Board Committee, he/she may contact the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S Department of Fair Employment and Housing, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or seek private counsel.

The City’s ADA Coordinator shall maintain ADA grievance files for a period of three years.

City of Monterey ADA Coordinator
Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
City of Monterey
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Telephone Numbers
Phone: (831) 646-3760
TTY: 711
Email: [email protected]

APPENDIX B
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 52, Packet Page 257

CITY OF MONTEREY
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 - GRIEVANCE FORM This form is for submitting complaints that the City of Monterey has not complied with the ADA. All complaints will be investigated. Please type or print legibly.

Name of Grievant: Date of Incident:

Address: City State Zip Telephone
Number: E-mail address:

If the Grievant is not the individual completing this form, please provide the authorized representative’s name: Relationship:

Representative’s Telephone Number:

Alleged Violations: Describe how the City has not complied with the requirements of the ADA; please attach additional pages if necessary:

Requested Action: What actions do you request the City of Monterey take to correct the alleged ADA non-compliance or discrimination?
Has a Complaint been filed with a State or Federal Agency: YES NO Name of Agency: Date Filed: Contact:

Signature of (circle one) Grievant or Authorized Representative:

Date:

Please submit the completed form to: Nat Rojanasathira, Asst. City Manager, ADA Coordinator City of Monterey
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Phone (831) 646-3760 / TTY: 711
Email: [email protected]
For more information or assistance in completing the form, please contact the ADA Coordinator.

Version 01/2024

APPENDIX B
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 53, Packet Page 258 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 43

Appendix C: Self-Evaluation Examples of Survey Responses by Section
Print Communications: examples of survey responses
Question: Do your Department's printed publications and notices inform readers that the publications are available in alternative formats, if needed, for persons with disabilities? Responses: 40.9% No; 36.4% Not consistently; 18.2% Not sure; 4.5% N/A.

Question: Do all of your Department’s printed publications and notices use a certain font type and size for City published documents?
Responses: 40.9% No; 40.9% Not consistently; 9/1% Yes; 4.5% Not sure; 4.5%, N/A.

Question: Has your Department reviewed all publications and notices to determine whether they portray persons with disabilities in a demeaning or offensive manner? Responses: 28.6% Yes; 28.6% Not sure; 23.8% No; 14.3% Not consistently; 4.8% N/A.

Question: Has your Department trained its staff to ensure that all publications and correspondence use “person first language”?
Responses: 60% No; 20% Not sure; 20% N/A.

Communication With People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: examples of survey responses
Question: Does your Department list “711 the California Relay” on business cards and letterheads?
Responses: 95.7% No; 4.3% Not sure.

Question: Are your Department’s telephone lines accessible to persons who are DHH? Responses: 60.9% Not sure; 21.7% Yes; 17.4% No.

Question: Has your Department identified local resources that can provide auxiliary aids for communication as needed?
Responses: 39.1% Yes; 34.8% Not sure; 21.7% No; 4.3% Not consistently.

Question: If your Department uses video for any reason or in any forum (e.g., internal employee training, public outreach via the web on social media, YouTube, etc.), is that video captioned?
Responses: 30.4% No; 30.4% Not consistently; 17.4% Not sure; 13% N/A; 8.7% Yes.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 54, Packet Page 259 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 44

Question: Does your Department have a policy in place for securing video remote interpreting services (VRI)?
Responses: 65.2% No; 17.4% Not sure; 8.7% N/A; 4.3% Not consistently; 4.3% Yes.

Question: If your Department has a Public Information Officer that communicates with the press and releases critical information, is an American Sign Language interpreter visible and within the screenshot if television cameras are in use or is a captioning service used?
Responses: 39.1% No; 39.1% N/A; 17.4% Not sure; 4.3% Not consistently.

Software & Digital Communication: examples of survey responses Question: Does the Department ensure that its webpage is accessible to persons with disabilities by applying Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)? Responses: 50% Yes; 35.7% Not sure; 7.1% No; 7.1% N/A.

Question: Does the Department use any web-based forms for use internally or by the public?
Responses: 57.1% Yes; 21.4% No; 14.3% Not sure; 7.1% N/A.

Question: Does the Department use any internally-developed software, including mobile applications and payment systems, either internally or externally? Responses: 78.6% No; 14.3% Not sure; 7.1% Yes.

Question: Does the Department use any third-party software, including mobile applications and payment systems, either internally or externally? Responses: 92.9% Yes; 7.1% No.

Question: Does the Department use any touch screen information systems for public interaction?
Responses: 64.3% No; 28.6% N/A; 7.1% Yes.

Question: Does the Department offer any type of computer or digital device for use by the public?
Responses: 50% No; 28.6% N/A; 14.3% Yes; 7.1% Not consistently.

Question: In email communications (both internal and external), does the Department ensure that all communications – including attachments – comply with WCAG? Responses: 30.8% No; 30.8% Not consistently; 23.1% Not sure; 15.4% Yes.

Question: Are PDFs checked for accessibility?
Responses: 46.2% No; 46.2% Not consistently; 7.7% Not sure.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 55, Packet Page 260 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 45

Question: Are all photos captioned with descriptive text? Responses: 61.5% Not consistently; 23.1% No; 7.7% Yes; 7.7% Not sure.

Staff & Employees: examples of survey responses
Question: Does the Department affirmatively recruit persons with disabilities for available positions?
Responses: 41.2% Not sure; 35.3% Yes; 11.8% No; 11.8% N/A.

Question: Does the Department ensure that all of its job listings are accessible to persons with disabilities?
Responses: 58.8% Yes; 23.5% Not sure; 11.8% N/A; 5.9% No.

Question: Do Department job listings contain a statement of non-discrimination against persons with disabilities?
Responses: 76.5% Yes; 11.8% N/A; 5.9% No; 5.9% Not sure.

Question: Does the Department offer candidates for employment the opportunity to request reasonable accommodation?
Responses: 83.3% Yes; 11.1% N/A; 5.6% Not sure.

Question: Are interview panel members trained regarding disability awareness and appropriate interactions with people with disabilities? Responses: 23.5% Yes; 23.5% No; 23.5%; Not sure; 16.6% N/A; 11.8% Not consistently.

Question: When your Department conducts employment interviews, is the decision to hire based upon which candidate is best qualified to perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodations?
Responses: 81.3% Yes; 12.5% N/A; 6.3% Not sure.

Question: Does the Department offer Staff and Employees an opportunity to self-identify as a person with a disability?
Responses: 50% Yes; 33.3% Not sure; 16.7% N/A.

Question: Does the Department offer training on accessibility best practices and/or the ADA to staff, employees and/or volunteers?
Responses: 64.7% No; 11.8% N/A; 5.9% Yes.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 56, Packet Page 261 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 46

Question: Does the Department ensure that all opportunities for advancement and education are available and accessible to Staff and Employees who may have a disability? This includes, but is not limited to, certifications, workshops, training, conferences, meetings, etc.

Responses: 58.8% Yes; 17.6% Not sure; 11.8% Not consistently; 11.8% N/A.

Question: Does the Department have a process for its staff and/or employees to request a reasonable accommodation?
Responses: 77.8% Yes; 11.1% Not sure; 11.1% N/A.

Question: Does the Department’s reasonable accommodation process include a search for transfer into a vacant, funded role as an accommodation of last resort? Responses: 52.9% Yes; 35.3% Not sure; 11.8% N/A.

Question: If reasonable modifications are used to create access, are they approved before they are put in place?
Responses: 41.2% Yes; 35.3% Not sure; 17.6% N/A; 5.9% Not consistently.

Question: When reasonable modifications are put in place, are they documented to ensure staff implements them appropriately?
Responses: 47.1% Yes; 23.5% Not sure; 17.6% N/A; 11.8% Not consistently.

Question: Does the Department ensure that its facilities and offices are fully accessible? Responses: 41.2% Yes; 29.4% Not consistently; 11.8% Not sure; 11.8% N/A; 5.9% No.

Question: Is there an anti-disability harassment policy? Responses: 64.7% Yes; 11.8% Not sure; 11.8% N/A; 11.8% No.

Question: Does the Department have a policy regarding service and/or support animals for its employees?
Responses: 41.2% Not sure; 29.4% Yes; 23.5% No; 5.9% N/A.

Purchasing, Contract, Vendors: example survey results
Question: When the purchase of new equipment is made (purchases including, but not limited to, communication and transportation equipment), is it reviewed to ensure the equipment is accessible to users with disabilities?
Responses: 46.7% Not sure; 33.3% Yes; 13.3% N/A; 6.7% No.

Question: Are all public documents related to bidding and contracting available to persons with disabilities in alternative format if needed?

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 57, Packet Page 262 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 47

Responses: 46.7% Yes; 26.7% Not sure; 20% N/A; 6.7% No.

Question: Are meetings related to bidding and contracting held in accessible locations? Responses: 60% Yes; 20% Not sure; 20% N/A.

Question: Do all City contracts have language in place holding contractors and vendors to applicable State and Federal disability civil rights mandates? Responses: 40% Yes; 26.7% Not sure; 20% N/A; 6.7% Not consistently; 6.7% No.

Question: Is an accessibility plan check done when vendors are conducting tenant improvements in public service areas?
Responses: 69.2% N/A; 15.4% Yes; 15.4% Not sure.

Question: Is guidance in place for staff and vendors regarding clear space and furniture placement?
Responses: 46.2% Yes; 30.8% N/A; 15.4% N/A; 7.7% No.

Construction and Remodels: examples of survey responses Question: Do all design contracts hold design professionals to designs that use, at minimum, the most stringent access standards in effect at the time of the project? Responses: 80% N/A; 20% Yes.

Question: Do design contracts encourage design professionals to exceed the maximum access standards when possible to ensure that construction tolerances are built into the project?
Responses: 80% N/A; 20% Yes.

Question: Is a policy in place that mandates CASp inspections at key points of construction and at completion before final payment is made? Responses: 80% N/A; 20% Not sure.

Question: Are major public projects reviewed by stakeholders with disabilities during the planning stage?
Responses: 80% N/A; 20% Not sure.

General Purchases: examples of survey responses
Question: When purchasing items for installation, are checks are in place to ensure installation will be compliant with current building standards?

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 58, Packet Page 263 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 48

Responses: 46.7% Yes; 26.7% Not sure; 13.3% N/A; 13.3% No.

Question: When purchasing an item that contains an operational part, do you consider accessibility requirements, (e.g., ability to operate with one hand; maximum 5lbs operational pressure; no grasping, pinching, and twisting; etc.)? Responses: 40% Yes; 26.7% Not sure; 13.3% Not consistently; 13.3% No; 6.7% N/A.

Question: When furniture is purchased, does the Department consider accessibility factors such as knee clearance for tables and clear space within a room? Responses: 46.7% Yes; 20% Not sure; 13.3% Not consistently; 13.3% N/A; 6.7% No.

Facilities & Real Estate Management: examples of survey responses Question: Does your Department ensure accessibility of any public rights of way (PRoW)?
Responses: 63.6% Yes; 27.3% N/A; 9.1% Not sure.

Question: If yes, does your Department receive complaints from the public regarding inaccessible PRoW? How does the Department ensure that methods for receiving these complaints (e.g., via telephone, web-based forms, email) are accessible to people with disabilities?
Responses: Responding Department have not received any complaints; complaints are received by the ADA Coordinator in the City Manager’s Office and forwarded on to the Public Works Department for inspection/correction; Telephone, email and in person; We direct them to the Community Development - Permits and Inspection Services.

Question: Does your Department have an accessibility construction inspection checklist for use by building code officials/building inspectors as a reference guide to assist with on-site inspection of accessibility features and construction elements affecting accessibility compliance to your facilities?
Responses: 63.6% N/A; 27.3% Not sure; 9.1% No.

Question: Is there a policy and/or procedure in place ensuring proper maintenance of accessible features?
Responses: 45.5% Yes; 23.3% No; 18.2% Not sure; 9.1% No.

Question: If yes, when was it last updated?
Responses: Part of an ongoing preventative maintenance checklist (3); unknown, but Building Department would know; Current.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 59, Packet Page 264 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 49

Planning, Construction & Buildings: examples of survey responses Question: When examining plans, does the Department evaluate accessibility requirements?
Responses: 66.7% N/A; 33.3% Yes.

Question: Does the Department have any staff or employees who evaluate accessibility of built environments for persons with disabilities?
Responses: 50% N/A; 25% Not sure; 12.5% Yes; 12.5% No.

Capital Projects & Fleet Services: examples of survey responses Question: Does your Department have an accessibility checklist that it uses for all Capital projects?
Response: Yes
Question: If yes, please describe any pertinent documentation.

Response: Accessibility is one component of the Project Biddability review form.

Question: If yes, how does your Department ensure that accessibility is implemented in all Capital projects?
Response: Projects are designed to meet applicable requirements. Each project undergoes a Project Biddability Review and identifies components of the project that can be or need to be improved.

Question: Does your Department utilize vehicles for transportation? Response: Yes
Question: When procuring and maintaining vehicles for transportation uses, what procedures and/or guidelines does your Department follow or implement to ensure that these vehicles are accessible to persons with disabilities? Response(s): New acquisitions would be made with disabilities specified in the planning process upon request. Vehicle access aids are installed upon request on any owned vehicles; This process is completed by the Fleet Department. The four vehicles we have are used only by employees for employees.

Question: Does your Department offer training to transportation providers regarding disability awareness and how to ensure access and safety to riders with disabilities (including the use of tie-downs)?
Response: No

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 60, Packet Page 265 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 50

Question: Are service animals allowed on transportation systems? Response: No
Public Meetings: examples of survey responses
Question: Does the Department hold or sponsor events that are available to the public? Responses: 75% Yes; 18.8% No; 6.3% N/A.

Question: Does the Department have an event planning accessibility checklist to ensure that all public meetings and events are fully accessible? Responses: 50% No; 37.5% Not sure; 12.5% N/A.

Question: If security checks are required to attend any public function, are security personnel trained in best practices for conducting security checks for persons with disabilities?
Responses: 86.7% N/A; 13.3% Not sure.

Question: Do all meeting notices contain an announcement that reasonable accommodations are available for persons with disabilities as needed and/or upon request?
Responses: 53.3% Yes; 20% N/A; 13.3% Not sure; 6.7% Not consistently; 6.7% No.

Question: Are all persons who administer public meetings trained in how to respond to requests for reasonable accommodations by members of the public? Responses: 33.3% Yes; 26.7% N/A; 20% Not sure; 13.3% No; 6.7% Not consistently.

Question: Does the Department take steps to ensure that all meetings are held in buildings and rooms that are fully accessible?
Responses: 73.3% Yes; 20% N/A; 6.7% No.

Question: Is staff trained to set up meeting rooms to provide maneuvering space for persons who use wheelchairs or service animals?
Responses: 37.5% Yes; 25%N/A; 12.5% Not consistently; 12.5% N/A; 12.5% No.

Question: Are public meetings held on sites that are accessible by public transportation?
Responses: 60% Yes; 20% N/A; 13.3% Not consistently; 6.7% Not sure.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 61, Packet Page 266 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 51

Question: Do public meeting notices contain language indicating that service animals are welcome?
Responses: 40% Not sure; 33.3% No; 20% N/A; 6.7% Yes.

Question: Do all public meetings have reserved seating for people who use wheelchairs?
Responses: 33.3% Yes; 26.7% N/A; 20% Not sure; 13.3% No; 6.7% Not consistently.

Question: Does this reserved seating also include integrated companion seating? Responses: 40% N/A; 33.3% Yes; 13.3% Not sure; 6.7% No; 6.7% Not consistently.

Question: Are all presenters at public meetings trained on best practices for presenting content to persons with disabilities, e.g., reading PowerPoints aloud? Responses: 33.3% Not consistently; 26.7% No; 26.7% N/A; 13.3% Not sure.

Question: Are sign language interpreters and/or real-time captioners available for all public meetings?
Responses: 60% No; 26.7% N/A; 13.3% Not sure.

Question: If your Department offers physical education or similar classes, programs or activities, are students or athletes with disabilities able to be served in an integrated setting (i.e., alongside non-disabled individuals)?
Responses: 75% Not consistently; 25% Yes.

Emergency Procedures: examples of survey responses
Question: Does your Department have procedures in place regarding the evacuation of persons with disabilities?
Responses: 35.3% Yes; 35.3% Not sure; 29.4% No.

Question: Does your Department utilize Department vehicles for transporting civilians in any instance, including emergency evacuation incidents? Responses: 62.5% No; 31.3% Yes; 6.3% N/A.

Question: If yes, are transport vehicles equipped to transport persons with disabilities? (Please describe in detail, if applicable).

Responses: 2 N/A; 4 No, they are not equipped.

Question: Does your Department work in partnership with other entities regarding the set up and administration of evacuation shelters or centers? Responses: 56.3% Yes; 37.5% Not sure; 6.3% No.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 62, Packet Page 267 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 52

Question: If yes, does the Department have a checklist regarding accessibility at evacuation shelters or centers? (Please describe that checklist, if applicable).

Responses: 7 No or We do not have a checklist; 1 Not sure; 1 N/A.

Police – Custody: examples of survey responses
Question: Have the Department’s first responders been trained regarding the disability civil rights mandates that the City is held to under State and Federal laws? Response: Not sure.

Question: Have holding and booking areas been reviewed for access since the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design became effective?
Response: Yes.

Question: If visitor areas are offered, are they accessible? Response: Yes.

Question: If inmate phone systems are provided, is there a phone system for inmates who are deaf or hard of hearing?
Response: Not sure.

Question: When arrests are made, how are service animals dealt with? Response: Animals are taken to the City kennel.

Question: When arrests are made, how are medical appliances (canes, walkers, hearing aids, oxygen tanks, etc.) addressed?
Response: Allowed to keep if don't present a danger or hold contraband, otherwise cite and release.

Question: How are power wheelchairs, scooters and other large mobility devices transported after an arrest?
Response: Transported in a Police Department vehicle.

Question: How do officers communicate with persons who are deaf? Response: Sign language interpreter.

Records: examples of survey responses

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 63, Packet Page 268 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 53

Question: In what format does your Department maintain records that are available to the public? (e.g., hard copy, digital)?
Responses: Most responses indicated a combination of hard copy and digital records, with some Departments indicating records are kept in digital format only.

Question: How does your Department ensure that digital records are fully accessible to persons with disabilities?
Examples of Responses: Not sure; Accessible documents provided upon request; digital or hard copies can be provided upon request.

Question: Does your Department offer assistance to persons with disabilities with regard to public records services, e.g., filing, requesting documents, reviewing documents?
Responses: 30.8% Not sure; 23.1% Yes; 23.1% Upon request; 15.4% No; 7.7% N/A.

Library Services: examples of survey responses
Question: Have Library Staff been trained in disability awareness, person-first language, and the legal mandates to which the City is held?
Responses: Not consistently (2).

Question: Does the Library offer any electronic information systems or resources to its guests, e.g., computer stations, kiosks, etc.?
Response: Yes.

Question: If yes, what measures are in place to ensure that these systems or resources are accessible to persons with disabilities?
Response: basic Microsoft accessibility and furniture is accessible.

Question: Does the Library offer any software for use by its employees or guests? Responses: Yes (2).

Question: If yes, what measures are in place to ensure that this software complies with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines?
Response: Unsure.

Question: Does the Library utilize notification systems (e.g., Public Address systems, flashing lights, tones) to inform guests that it is closing? Responses: Staff walk through and notify people (2).

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 64, Packet Page 269 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 54

Question: How does the Library ensure that all physical materials (e.g., books, DVDs, brochures, periodicals) are on accessible routes, are within reach ranges, and have clear space for approach?
Responses: Periodic review of spaces and physical items are not all within reach range.

Building was last modified prior to ADA guidelines.

Question: How does the Library ensure that any furniture which supports Library programs and services (e.g., bookshelves, brochure racks, computer stations, study carrels) are on accessible routes, are within reach ranges, and have clear space for approach?
Responses: Periodic review of spaces and minimum 36" is actively maintained for routes.

City Attorney: example survey responses
Question: Does your Department provide training to any other City Department or Office on the Americans with Disabilities Act?
Response: Upon request.

Question: Does your Department draft policies regarding implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act or accessibility requirements in built and/or digital environments?
Response: Yes.

Question: If yes, please describe policies created by your Department.

Response: ADA reasonable accommodation request and grievance policy.

General – Other: examples of survey responses
Question: Does your Department have an ADA Notice of Compliance posted? Responses: 55.6% Not sure; 22.2% No; 16.7% Yes; 5.6% N/A.

Question: Does your Department have any policies regarding service and/or emotional support animals for its employees and/or the public?
Responses: 57.9% No; 26.3% Not sure; 10.5% Yes; 5.3% N/A.

Question: Does your Department offer printed informational brochures to the public? Responses: 55.6% Yes; 38.9% No; 5.6% N/A.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 65, Packet Page 270 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 55

Question: If yes, are these (printed informational brochures) offered in large print formats?
Responses: 66.7% No; 25% N/A; 8.3% Not sure.

Question: If yes, are these (printed informational) brochures offered in accessible locations (e.g., with adequate clear floor space and within reach ranges for persons who use mobility devices)?
Responses: 46.2% Yes; 38.5% N/A; 7.7% Not sure; 7.7% No.

Question: Does your Department have a policy in place that prohibits discrimination against people who formerly used drugs illegally and have been through a rehabilitation program?
Responses: 72.2% Not sure; 16.7% No; 5.6% Yes; 5.6% N/A.

Question: Based on all the above, are there areas where you feel training of Department staff would be beneficial?
Responses: 76.5% Yes; 11.8% No; 5.9% N/A; 5.9% Not sure.

APPENDIX C
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 66, Packet Page 271 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 56
Appendix D: Self-Evaluation Work Plan

APPENDIX D
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 67, Packet Page 272 Subject Recommendations Department(s) Responsible (if applicable) Date Department Assigned (if applicable) Person(s) Responsible (if applicable) Due Date Milestone(s) Training(Y/N) Date Completed City Notes Ensure that all City printed publications and notices inform readers that the publications are available in alternative formats, if needed, for persons with disabilities.Ensure that all City printed publications use a uniform, accessible font, and are reviewed to ensure they do not portray people with disabilities in a demeaning or offensive way.Develop and implement staff training to ensure that all publications and correspondence use “person-first” language.Ensure that all printed publications inform readers that the publications are available in alternative formats, if needed.Although “711 the California Relay” is noted on the City’s website, it is also recommended that business cards and letterhead indicate “711 the California Relay” to facilitate accessible communications.Check to ensure that phone lines are accessible to people who are Deaf or hard of hearing.Ensure that there is an identified local resource that can provide auxiliary aids for communication as needed.If videos are used (internally or for the public), ensure that all Departments are informed of resources available to make certain that videos are captioned.Review to determine if there is a policy in place for securing Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) services and, if not, create and disseminate this policy.For events utilizing a Public Information Officer (PIO), implement policy to ensure that Departments have an American Sign Language interpreter visible and within the screenshot if television cameras are in use, and that captioning services are used as a matter of course.Establish and implement policy that all websites and electronic communications comply with current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1 AA).Establish how WCAG compliance will be maintained and communicate this expectation across Departments.Establish and implement policy that all electronic documents (e.g. PDFs, Word Documents and photographs) are accessible to people with disabilities and/or are available in alternative, accessible formats.Consider partnering with local disability rights groups and organizations to affirmatively notify and recruit persons with disabilities to available roles.Establish and disseminate practices to ensure that all job listings are accessible.Ensure that all job listings contain a statement regarding nondiscrimination against persons with disabilities.

City of Monterey: 2024 ADA Self-Evaluation Update & Work PlanPrint CommunicationsCommunication With People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (DHH)Software & Digital CommunicationStaff & Employees

APPENDIX D
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 68, Packet Page 273 Consider implementing methods to offer Staff and Employees an opportunity to self-identify as a person with a disability.Ensure there is a City-wide process to approve reasonable modifications (i.e. modifications used to create access).Ensure that the City’s reasonable accommodations process includes a search for transfer into a vacant, funded role as an accommodation of last resort.Ensure that all facilities managers have a resource to determine the accessibility of their facilities and develop and implement regular processes for the ongoing evaluation of facility accessibility.Ensure that all Departments have an easily ascertainable policy against disability harassment, as well as a grievance system that offers assistance to people with disabilities who, due to their disability, are not able to independently complete the grievance.Ensure that the City has a current and easily ascertainable policy regarding service and/or support animals for its employees (and the public).Review whether there is a City policy requiring that accessibility be considered when purchasing new equipment. If not, consider creating, distributing and implementing such a policy City-wide.Ensure that documents related to bidding and contracting are uniformly (i.e., City-wide) accessible and available in alternative formats.Ensure that meetings related to bidding and contracting are uniformly (i.e., City-wide) held in accessible locations.Ensure that contractual language is uniformly in place (i.e., City-wide) holding contractors and vendors to applicable State and Federal disability civil rights mandates.Review whether there is a City policy requiring that all products and services offered by third parties and vendors are fully accessible. If not, consider creating, distributing and implementing such a policy City-wide.Review whether there is a City policy requiring that accessibility plan checks are performed when vendors conduct tenant improvements in public service areas. If not, consider creating, distributing, and implementing such a policy City-wide.Develop and offer guidance for staff and vendors regarding clear space and furniture placement.Inform all Departments as to what uniform steps an employee or member of the public with a disability has available if they believe they have been discriminated against by a County vendor or contractor.Consider creating, disseminating, and implementing a policy requiring CASp inspections at key points of construction and at completion, and before final payments are made.Review to see whether processes to ensure that persons with disabilities are engaged by the City on major construction projects exist and, if not, develop and implement these protocols.

General Purchases Establish a uniform process for ensuring accessibility of items – including furniture and items with operational parts - purchased for installation.

Purchasing, Contracts, VendorsConstruction and Remodels

APPENDIX D
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 69, Packet Page 274 Consider establishing and utilizing an accessibility construction inspection checklist for use by building code officials/building inspectors as a reference guide to assist with on-site inspection of accessibility features and construction elements affecting accessibility compliance to your facilities.Review to determine whether there is a current policy ensuring proper maintenance of accessible features and, if not, establish and implement such a policy.

Planning, Construction, Buildings During construction, consider assigning staff or employees to evaluate construction sites for accessible paths of travel along public rights of way for persons with disabilities.Consider developing training for transportation providers regarding disability awareness and how to ensure access and safety to riders (either members of the public or employees) with disabilities.Modify service animal policy to include service animals in transportation (for any City-provided transportation services, including the public and employees).Create and implement an events accessibility checklist for all Departments that hold public meetings which addresses, at a minimum, the items included within this portion of the Self-Evaluation survey.Departments that offer physical education or similar classes, programs or activities should develop protocols to ensure that participants with disabilities are able to be served in an integrated setting, and that there is adaptive equipment available to people with disabilities.Ensure that all Departments have procedures in place regarding the evacuation of persons with disabilities.Determine whether there is a Building Safety Plan for the buildings where your department operates.For vehicles used to transport civilians in any instance, including emergency evacuation incidents, implement a policy and practice of ensuring that these vehicles are equipped to transport persons with disabilities.Communicate with emergency partners to ensure that any evacuation facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities.Ensure that first responders and law enforcement are trained regarding: the disability civil rights mandates that the City is held to under State and Federal laws and the best techniques for communication with persons with disabilities (including people with mental disabilities).Ensure that law enforcement personnel are trained in how to safely transport large medical devices such as motorized wheelchairs.Ensure that law enforcement personnel are trained in best practices for dealing with service animals.

Facilities and Real Estate ManagementCapital Projects & Fleet ServicesPublic MeetingsEmergency ProceduresPolice - Custody

APPENDIX D
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 70, Packet Page 275 With regard to animals of persons involved in arrests, update all policies - including service and emotional support animal policies - to ensure that any animals who may be temporarily sent to Animal Care and Control or any animal shelter are not to be inadvertently euthanized.

Records Develop and implement protocols to ensure the uniform accessibility of City records to persons with disabilities.Ensure that Library Staff are trained in disability awareness, personfirst language, and the legal mandates to which the City is held.Ensure that Library Staff are trained in how to assist guests with disabilities.Where applicable, ensure that all physical materials (for use by the public) are on accessible routes, are within reach ranges, and have clear space for approach or, minimally, that Staff are situated nearby to provide assistance (and are trained on how to do so). Accessible routes include functioning elevators and clear paths of travel.Where applicable, ensure that all physical materials (for use by the public) are on accessible routes, are within reach ranges, and have clear space for approach or, minimally, that Staff are situated nearby to provide assistance (and are trained on how to do so). Accessible routes include functioning elevators and clear paths of travel.If the Library offers any software or websites for use by its employees or guests, put measures in place to ensure that this software complies with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.Ensure that the Library has an Emergency Management plan to assist guests or employees with disabilities in the event of an emergency situation (e.g., evacuation, active shooter).Regularly and proactively offer training regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act, disability awareness, person-first language, and the civil rights legal mandates to which the City is held.Regularly review and update policies regarding implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as accessibility policies and requirements for built and digital environments.Ensure that all Departments have ADA Notices of Compliance posted.Ensure that all Departments have access to and are aware of City policies regarding service and/or emotional support animals for its employees and/or the public.Ensure that all Departments that offer printed informational brochures to the public, and all Departments that issue any sort of fine or citation, have those available in large print format, in accessible locations, and are able to provide alternative formats upon request.Ensure that all Departments have access to and are aware of City policy that prohibits discrimination against people who formerly used drugs illegally and have been through a rehabilitation program.

City AttorneyGeneral - OtherLibrary Services

APPENDIX D
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 71, Packet Page 276 ADA Grievance Procedure, 28 CFR 35.107 Please see the recommendation regarding the City’s Grievance Procedure “Policy Recommendations”, below. Please also ensure that all City Departments and Leadership are aware of this procedure and publicize its availability to their constituency.

ADA Notice of Compliance, 28 CFR 35.106 Per “Policy Recommendations”, below, there are no recommendations regarding this Notice other than to ensure that this document be disseminated broadly to City Departments and Leadership.ABA-392-PP: Consider adding best practices discussion on interactions between law enforcement and people with disabilities, especially in the areas of cognitive disabilities and neurodiversity.ADA Grievance Form: While the form requests grievances be filed within 60 days of the alleged violation, please note that Title II of the ADA does not contain an express statute of limitations.ADA Policies and Procedures: Because the City of Monterey is located in the State of California, and because the California Building Code has, in some instances, accessibility standards that exceed ADA standards, consider updating these policies and procedures to also reference California Building Code standards.CASp: Update document with a link to the Division of the State Architect’s information page regarding the CASp program: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/DSA/Resources/Page-Content/Resources-ListFolder/Certified-Access-Specialist-Property-Inspection.Purchasing Authorized Signatures List: Update document to reference the 2022 California Building Code.City Council, Reso No. 93-013, Title “Fully Comply with ADA Act of 1990, Mtg Date _1_19_1993: Adopt an updated resolution inclusive of the ADAAA of 2008.FT-RPT New Hire Packet Combo With Uniform Allowance: For the section entitled “Employee Survey - EEO-4 Reporting (pps. 5-7 of the pdf), replace the word “Handicapped” with “Disabled or Person with a Disability”. Also, refer to the definition of “disability” as provided by the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S. Code § 12102) as well as the Rehabilitation Act. If this Self-ID reporting is strictly for the EEOC (federal), this will be sufficient amendment. If this Self-ID reporting is for City or State records, also include the definition of disability (see California Government Code Section 12926).PTS New Hire Packet Combo: Same recommendations for FT/RPT employees, see above.ADA Accommodation Request Form & Grievance Form: ensure these are two separate forms, and that any online form complies with WCAG.

Policies & Recommendations

APPENDIX D
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 72, Packet Page 277 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update - 2024 City of Monterey December | 2024 57

Appendix E: Updated 2024 Access Compliance Survey Reports

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 73, Packet Page 278 Summary by Facility
December 13, 2024 - Page S-1
City Facilities Closed:$2,088,274.00 Open:$19,577,820.00 Total: $21,666,094.00 Report Production Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 74, Packet Page 279 Summary by Facility
December 13, 2024 - Page S-2
City Buildings Closed:$1,320,434.00 Open:$8,922,371.00
Facility: 101 Scholze Park Center $0.00 $319,314.00
Facility: 102 Corporation Yard $0.00 $67,915.00
Facility: 103 Building Maintenance POM Shop $0.00 $488,810.00 Facility: 104 Cannery Row Fishing Shack $6,204.00 $5,380.00 Facility: 105 Cemetery Office $5,076.00 $233,547.00
Facility: 108 City Hall Complex $7,896.00 $1,107,076.00 Facility: 108.1 Old Monterey Jail & Colton Hall $0.00 $520,558.00 Facility: 109 Conference Center $879,395.00 $0.00
Facility: 110 Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce - 2013 $0.00 $46,198.00 Facility: 110.1 Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce - 2023 $0.00 $34,469.00 Facility: 111 Pacific Biological Laboratories $0.00 $9,026.00 Facility: 112 Employee Lounge $0.00 $61,830.00
Facility: 113 Police and Fire Annex $0.00 $255,600.00
Facility: 113.1 Fire Administration $0.00 $866.00
Facility: 114 Fire Station No. 11 $0.00 $209,295.00
Facility: 115 Fire Station No. 12 $0.00 $84,941.00
Facility: 116 Fire Station No. 13 $0.00 $72,736.00
Facility: 117 Gordon House $0.00 $167,559.00
Facility: 118 Harbormaster's Office $0.00 $702,006.00
Facility: 119 Harbor Storage Facility $0.00 $444.00
Facility: 120 Housing and Property Management $315,185.00 $0.00 Facility: 123 Ketcham House $0.00 $32,509.00
Facility: 124 Library $21,124.00 $400,174.00
Facility: 125 Waterfront Community Room and Public Restrooms $0.00 $73,361.00 Facility: 128 Lower Presidio Museum $20,727.00 $164,883.00 Facility: 129 Osio-Rodriquez Adobe $0.00 $16,654.00
Facility: 129.1 Osio-Rodrigues Adobe Business Entrances $0.00 $3,195.00 Facility: 134 Vasquez Adobe Building $0.00 $419,993.00
Facility: 136 Monterey Sports Center $14,775.00 $533,891.00 Report Production Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 75, Packet Page 280 Summary by Facility
December 13, 2024 - Page S-3
Facility: 137 Wharf I $0.00 $140,325.00
Facility: 137.1 Wharf I Leased Entrances $0.00 $3,057.00 Facility: 137.2 Wharf I Leased Entrances $0.00 $4,965.00 Facility: 137.3 Wharf I Leased Entrances $0.00 $13,965.00 Facility: 137.4 Wharf I Leased Entrances $0.00 $113,791.00 Facility: 138 Wharf II $0.00 $330,112.00
Facility: 138.1 Wharf II Leased Entrances $0.00 $10,447.00 Facility: 139 City Offices $0.00 $213,372.00
Facility: 140 El Estero Park Center $0.00 $309,776.00
Facility: 141 First French Consulate $0.00 $118,785.00
Facility: 143 Cannery Row Parking Garage Office $14,664.00 $120,689.00 Facility: 143.1 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Ste 100 $0.00 $91,273.00 Facility: 143.2 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances $0.00 $4,567.00 Facility: 143.3 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances $0.00 $2,630.00 Facility: 143.4 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances $0.00 $518.00 Facility: 143.5 Cannery Row Parking Garage - Lease Space Entrances $0.00 $598.00 Facility: 144 Casanova Oak Knoll Park Center $1,384.00 $80,740.00 Facility: 145 Hilltop Center $0.00 $215,916.00
Facility: 147 Public Works Annex $0.00 $180,978.00
Facility: 150 150 Del Monte Avenue $0.00 $75,360.00
Facility: 151 Casa de la Estrella Apartments $0.00 $386,079.00 Facility: 152 English Apartments - Unit 19 $0.00 $0.00
Facility: 201 Mohr Imported Cars $0.00 $181,458.00
Facility: 202 Monterey Beach Station $0.00 $41,859.00
Facility: 203 Waterfront East - Leased Restaurant Building $34,004.00 $248,881.00 City Parking Lots Closed:$288,695.00 Open:$1,847,227.00 Facility: 1 Waterfront West $19,252.00 $0.00
Facility: 2 Waterfront East $143,115.00 $0.00
Facility: 3 Lot 3 $0.00 $72,594.00
Facility: 4 Lot 4 $0.00 $35,268.00
Report Production Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 76, Packet Page 281 Summary by Facility
December 13, 2024 - Page S-4
Facility: 5 Lot B $0.00 $14,005.00
Facility: 6 Entrance Wharf I $0.00 $1,294.00
Facility: 7 Lot 7 Calle Principal Parking Garage $6,204.00 $83,804.00 Facility: 8 Lot 8 $0.00 $33,029.00
Facility: 10 Lot 10 $20,726.00 $0.00
Facility: 11 Lot 11 $0.00 $13,693.00
Facility: 12 Lot C $0.00 $32,036.00
Facility: 13 Lot CR7 $0.00 $50,473.00
Facility: 14 Lot 14 $0.00 $4,825.00
Facility: 17 Breakwater Lot $111.00 $162,849.00
Facility: 18 Lot 18 $0.00 $12,694.00
Facility: 21 Lot 21 $0.00 $23,049.00
Facility: 23 Depot Lot (East) $0.00 $36,325.00
Facility: 23.1 Depot Lot East - Monterey Bay Kayaks $0.00 $198,602.00 Facility: 24 Lot 24 $0.00 $69,307.00
Facility: 27 Depot Lot (West) $2,023.00 $662.00
Facility: 27.1 Depot Lot West - Dust Bowl Tap Room $0.00 $28,387.00 Facility: 29 Cannery Row Parking Garage $95,880.00 $107,245.00 Facility: 30 East Parking Garage $0.00 $250,026.00
Facility: 31 West Parking Garage $1,384.00 $294,963.00
Facility: 32 Monterey Bay Lot 7 $0.00 $50,683.00
Facility: 33 Del Monte Beach Access & Parking Lot $0.00 $271,414.00 City Parks Closed:$479,145.00 Open:$8,808,222.00
Facility: 1001 Archer Park $322.00 $300,263.00
Facility: 1001.1 542 Archer Park Center - First Night Monterey $0.00 $187,731.00 Facility: 1004 Casanova Oak Knoll Park $0.00 $184,096.00 Facility: 1005 Cypress Park $5,922.00 $570,593.00
Facility: 1006 Deer Flats Park $0.00 $109,753.00
Facility: 1007 Don Dahvee Park $0.00 $302,967.00
Facility: 1008 El Estero Park Complex $27,183.00 $1,361,690.00 Report Production Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 77, Packet Page 282 Summary by Facility
December 13, 2024 - Page S-5
Facility: 1008.1 El Estero - Frank E. Sollecito Ballpark 2023 $0.00 $58,869.00 Facility: 1008.2 El Estero Parking Lot 2023 $0.00 $15,091.00 Facility: 1008.3 El Estero Boating 2023 $0.00 $39,999.00 Facility: 1010 Peter J. Ferrante Park $0.00 $254,761.00 Facility: 1011 Fisherman Flats Park $0.00 $114,449.00
Facility: 1012 Hilltop Park $4,653.00 $306,596.00
Facility: 1013 Hoffman Park & Playground $5,922.00 $213,802.00 Facility: 1014 Jacks Ball Park $222.00 $479,259.00
Facility: 1014.1 Monterey Tennis Center 2023 $0.00 $30,311.00 Facility: 1016 Laguna Grande Regional Park $222.00 $184,650.00 Facility: 1017 Laguna Grande Court Park $0.00 $22,049.00 Facility: 1019 Larkin Park $0.00 $152,685.00
Facility: 1021 Montecito Park $111.00 $60,395.00
Facility: 1022 Monterey Bay Park $111.00 $155,376.00
Facility: 1023 Oak Newton Park $5,862.00 $422,107.00
Facility: 1024 Quarry Park $0.00 $17,260.00
Facility: 1027 Ryan Ranch Park $0.00 $108,315.00
Facility: 1028 San Carlos Beach Park $0.00 $362,273.00
Facility: 1029 Scholze Park $3,384.00 $227,687.00
Facility: 1030 Fisherman's Shoreline Park $18,048.00 $307,306.00 Facility: 1030.1 Beach Parcel West of Fisherman’s Wharf $0.00 $409,337.00 Facility: 1031 Soldier Field $381,822.00 $0.00
Facility: 1032 Spray Avenue Tot Lot $0.00 $31,857.00
Facility: 1033 Veterans Memorial Park $9,766.00 $590,702.00 Facility: 1034 Via Paraiso Park $15,484.00 $667,857.00
Facility: 1035 Whispering Pine Park $111.00 $257,299.00 Facility: 1036 Monterey Museum of Art Park $0.00 $162,139.00 Facility: 1037 Spanish Park/Plaza $0.00 $138,698.00
Total: $2,088,274.00 $19,577,820.00
Report Production Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 78, Packet Page 283 CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT CITY FACILITIES #101

SENIOR CENTER
280 DICKMAN AVE TP13: 2013 ADA TP (UPDATED 2024)

CITY FACILITIES
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 79, Packet Page 284 Exterior - On-Site
101
101-0-1
Senior Center
101-0-1
280 Dicke.

Monterey Ca
93940
Senior Center
Elm st.

Magnolia Ave.
9 8 7 6 5 1
2 3
4 Sally Swanson
Architects
San Francisco, CA
Prepared By:

Date:
08/27/2012
Sheet:

Project #:
11037
Location:Facility:

REF NORTH
N.T.S.

BARRIER

LOCATION
MAP
City of
Monterey
1 Accessible Path of TravelItem Number

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 80, Packet Page 285 Interior - Basement & Ground Floor
101
101-1-1
Senior Center
101-1-0&1
280 Dickman Ave.

Monterey Ca
93940
Senior Center
Elm st.

Magnolia Ave.
101-1-0
1 754
3 16
151011
12 9
6 1314
8 21
Sally Swanson
Architects
San Francisco, CA
Prepared By:

Date:
08/27/2012
Sheet:

Project #:
11037
Location:Facility:

REF NORTH
N.T.S.

BARRIER

LOCATION
MAP
City of
Monterey
1 Accessible Path of TravelItem Number

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 81, Packet Page 286 CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
#101: SENIOR CENTER

CITY FACILITIES
280 DICKMAN AVE 2013 ADA TP (UPDATED 2023) TP13
Facility: 101 - Senior Center $319,314.00
Area: On-Site $134,974.00
0 - General-Scholze Park
1 - Accessible Parking Space in Scholze Center Lot $13,614 2 - POT from Parking Lot to Acc. Entrance of Senior Center & Driveway Parking Space $40,337 3 - Accessible Street Parking on Dickerson $20,950
4 - POT from Main Entrance to Scholze Park $382
5 - Stairs to Staff Entrance by Parking Lot $7,206
6 - Two Steps to Parking lot from Sidewalk on Foam St. $776 7 - POT from Foam St. Sidewalk to Studio $5,600
8 - Staff Entrance Stairs to Alliance on Aging $9,524
9 - Ramp from Senior Center Exit to Rear of Park $36,585 Area: Ground Floor $143,770.00
1 - Main Entrance and Lobby $12,334
2 - Meeting Room One (Conference Room) $5,302
3 - Small Kitchen Serving Meeting Room 1 $17,809
4 - Staff Restroom (by front desk) $3,246
5 - Staff Area by Main Lobby $2,366
6 - Ramp To Activity Rooms $6,486
7 - Ramp To Alliance on Aging $21,631
8 - Alliance on Aging $24,047
9 - Restroom Lobby $7,748
10 - Women's Restroom $1,219
11 - Men's Restroom $2,806
12 - Corridor to Dance Room $823
13 - Meeting Room Three $3,141
14 - Meeting Room Three Kitchen $17,038
15 - Computer Room $7,920
16 - Meeting Room Four and Kitchen $9,854
Area: Lower Level $40,570.00
1 - Studio $40,570
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page S-1

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 82, Packet Page 287 Area : On-Site
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 0 - General-Scholze Park
Accessibility Element: 0. General Note
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

Specific Item: General Note
Barrier Description:

See Parks Report for Facility #1029 Schloze Park for additional items serving the exterior park.

Priority: 1 0
ID:7015
End of Location: 0 - General-Scholze Park
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-1

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 83, Packet Page 288 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 1 - Accessible Parking Space in Scholze Center Lot Accessibility Element: Parking
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.3.3
Specific Item: Access Aisle-Marking
Barrier Description:

Access aisles not marked with a blue painted borderline around their perimeter, and the area within shall be marked with hatched lines a max. 36" on center, and the words "NO PARKING" shall be painted on the surface in min. 12" high white letters in a location within the access aisle that is visible from the adjacent vehicular way.

Proposed Solution:

Restripe to provide compliant accessible access aisle.

ADA 2010:502.3.3
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5416
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.2; 11B-502.3.1
$1,001.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $1001 / JOB
Specific Item: Accessible Parking Space
Barrier Description:

Paint striping is faded.

Proposed Solution:

Repaint striping at parking space(s) to create accessible space.

ADA 2010:502.2; 502.3.1
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5414
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.4
$11,160.00
Quantity: 310 SF
Unit Cost: $36 / SF
Specific Item: Floor or Ground Surface
Barrier Description:

Parking spaces and access aisles have irregular surface or slopes greater than 1:48 (2.083%) in any direction.

As-Built:

6.2% - 6.9%
Proposed Solution:

Regrade surface at accessible parking spaces to be of even surface and not slope more than 1:48 (2.083%) in any
direction.

ADA 2010:502.4
Priority: 1
1 ID:5415
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.6.4.1 Specific Item: Marking - ISA
Barrier Description:

Accessible space not marked with min. 36"x 36" ISA in white on a blue background within 6" of the centerline and aligned with the end of the parking space (CA only).

Or.

The parking space is not outlined in blue or painted blue and marked with an 36"x36" ISA in white or a suitable contrasting color.

Proposed Solution:

Paint compliant 36"x36" ISA at end of the parking space.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5419
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-2

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 84, Packet Page 289 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.7.2
$159.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $159 / JOB
Specific Item: Parking-Accessible Route
Barrier Description:

Curb or wheel stops not provided to prevent encroachment of vehicles over the required clear width of adjacent accessible routes.

Proposed Solution:

Provide wheel stops or curb to prevent encroachment into adjacent accessible routes.

ADA 2010:502.7
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:7014
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.6
$662.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $662 / JOB
Specific Item: Signage - ISA
Barrier Description:

Reflectorized parking space identification sign not provided or does not include the International Symbol of Accessibility (ISA) in white on a blue background, or is less than 70 square inches.

Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant accessible parking sign.

ADA 2010:502.6
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5412
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.6.2 Specific Item: Signage - Minimum Fine Barrier Description:

Additional sign below the International Symbol of Accessibility (ISA) stating “Minimum Fine $250” is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant accessible parking fine sign.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5418
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-208.2.4
Specific Item: Van Parking Spaces
Barrier Description:

Van accessible space not provided for every 6 or fraction of 6 accessible parking spaces.

As-Built:
5' wide access aisle
Proposed Solution:

Provide one van accessible parking space with compliant size, signage, markings and floor or ground surfaces with max. 1:48 (2.083%) slopes in any direction.

ADA 2010:208.2.4
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5413
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-3

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 85, Packet Page 290 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Accessibility Element: Sidewalk & Walks
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-247.1.2.5; 11B-250
$632.00
Quantity: 4 LF
Unit Cost: $158 / LF
Specific Item: Hazardous Vehicular Area
Barrier Description:

Walk crosses or adjoins a vehicular way, and the walking surfaces are not separated by curbs, railings, detectable warning or other elements between the pedestrian areas and vehicular areas.

Proposed Solution:

Provide continuous 36" minimum wide detectable warning or other barrier to separate pedestrian route from hazardous vehicular way.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5417
End of Location: 1 - Accessible Parking Space in Scholze Center Lot $13,614.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-4

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 86, Packet Page 291 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 2 - POT from Parking Lot to Acc. Entrance of Senior Center & Driveway Parking Space Accessibility Element: Parking
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.3.3
$464.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $464 / JOB
Specific Item: Access Aisle-Marking
Barrier Description:

Access aisles not marked with a blue painted borderline around their perimeter, and the area within shall be marked with hatched lines a max. 36" on center, and the words "NO PARKING" shall be painted on the surface in min. 12" high white letters in a location within the access aisle that is visible from the adjacent vehicular way.

Proposed Solution:

Restripe to provide compliant accessible access aisle.

ADA 2010:502.3.3
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5428
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.2; 11B-502.3.1
$1,001.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $1001 / JOB
Specific Item: Accessible Parking Space
Barrier Description:

Accessible parking space is less than 9' wide and 18' long and/or does not have compliant 5' wide access aisle.

As-Built:
6" wide
Proposed Solution:

Restripe to provide compliant accessible parking space.

ADA 2010:502.2; 502.3.1
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5434
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.2; 11B-502.3.1
$1,001.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $1001 / JOB
Specific Item: Accessible Parking Space
Barrier Description:

Striping faded: Accessible parking space does not have 5' wide access aisle; 8' wide for van accessible aisle (CA only: aisle spaces need to be 18' in length).

Proposed Solution:

Modify parking aisle(s) to create accessible space by
restriping.

ADA 2010:502.2; 502.3.1
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5433
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.4
Specific Item: Floor or Ground Surface
Barrier Description:

Parking spaces and access aisles have irregular surface or slopes greater than 1:48 (2.083%) in any direction.

As-Built:

3.2% - 3.5%
Proposed Solution:

Regrade surface at accessible parking spaces to be of even surface and not slope more than 1:48 (2.083%) in any
direction.

ADA 2010:502.4
Priority: 1
2 ID:5429
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-5

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 87, Packet Page 292 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.6.4.1
$582.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $582 / JOB
Specific Item: Marking - ISA
Barrier Description:

Accessible space not marked with min. 36"x 36" ISA in white on a blue background within 6" of the centerline and aligned with the end of the parking space (CA only).

Or.

The parking space is not outlined in blue or painted blue and marked with an 36"x36" ISA in white or a suitable contrasting color.

Proposed Solution:

Paint compliant 36"x36" ISA at end of the parking space.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5432
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.6.2
$176.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $176 / JOB
Specific Item: Signage - Minimum Fine
Barrier Description:

Additional sign below the International Symbol of Accessibility (ISA) stating “Minimum Fine $250” is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant accessible parking fine sign.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5431
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.8
$662.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $662 / JOB
Specific Item: Tow-away Signage
Barrier Description:

Tow-away sign is not posted either; 1) in a conspicuous place at each entrance to an off-street parking facility or 2) immediately adjacent to on-site accessible parking and visible from each parking space (CA only).

Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant tow-away sign.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5430
Accessibility Element: Sidewalk & Walks
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-303.1; 11B-403.4
Specific Item: Change in Level
Barrier Description:

Walk, where pavement meets concrete: Pavement dislocation creates abrupt change in level exceeding 1/2" in accessible route.

As-Built:

1.5" change in level
Proposed Solution:

Remove, replace or repair area of pavement sufficient to correct abrupt change in level.

ADA 2010:303.1; 403.4
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5422
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-6

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 88, Packet Page 293 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-303.1; 11B-403.4
Specific Item: Change in Level
Barrier Description:

At driveway walk: Pavement dislocation creates abrupt change in level exceeding 1/2" in accessible route.

As-Built:
1" gaps
Proposed Solution:

Remove, replace or repair area of pavement sufficient to correct abrupt change in level.

ADA 2010:303.1; 403.4
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5427
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$3,920.00
Quantity: 56 SF
Unit Cost: $70 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Cross
Barrier Description:

The cross slope of the pedestrian access route in a driveway exceeds the maximum required slope (1:48).

As-Built:

9.2% - 9.6%
Proposed Solution:

Modify the driveway to provide a slope not exceeding the required 1:48 (2%) maximum slope.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 1
2 ID:5424
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$5,040.00
Quantity: 72 SF
Unit Cost: $70 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Cross
Barrier Description:

Pavement along front of parked cars: Cross slope more than 1/4":12" (2%).

As-Built:

4.9% - 5.5%
Proposed Solution:

Modify cross slope.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 1
2 ID:5421
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$22,750.00
Quantity: 325 SF
Unit Cost: $70 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Cross
Barrier Description:

From driveway to front entrance: Cross slope more than
1/4":12" (2%).

As-Built:

2.4% - 6.4%
Proposed Solution:

Modify cross slope.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 1
2 ID:5426
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-7

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 89, Packet Page 294 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$4,550.00
Quantity: 65 SF
Unit Cost: $70 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Running
Barrier Description:

Walk at upper area of driveway: Slope greater than 1:20 (5.0%), and walk does not comply with requirements for ramps.

As-Built:

6.8%
Proposed Solution:

Modify walk/sidewalk slope to 1:20 or less.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 1
2 ID:5425
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
Specific Item: Slope - Running
Barrier Description:

Walk on concrete along street: Slope greater than 1:20 (5.0%), and walk does not comply with requirements for ramps.

As-Built:
7% - 7.3%
Proposed Solution:

Modify walk/sidewalk slope to 1:20 or less.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 1
2 ID:5423
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-216.6
$191.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $191 / JOB
Specific Item: Directional Sign
Barrier Description:

Near stair entrance: Exterior signage at inaccessible entrances to provide direction to accessible entrances is missing or noncompliant.

Proposed Solution:

Provide signage sufficient to guide persons to accessible entrances.

ADA 2010:216.6
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5420
End of Location: 2 - POT from Parking Lot to Acc. Entrance of Senior Center & Driveway Parking $40,337.00 Space
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-8

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 90, Packet Page 295 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 3 - Accessible Street Parking on Dickerson
Accessibility Element: Curb Ramp
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-406.5.12 Specific Item: Detectable Warnings Barrier Description:

Detectable warnings are not provided on curb ramp or are not compliant.

Proposed Solution:

Provide and/or replace detectable warning on curb ramp.

Detectable warnings shall extend 36" in the direction of travel and the full width of the ramp run.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
3 ID:5437
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-406.2.1
$17,149.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $17149 / JOB
Specific Item: Perpendicular CR: Ramp
Barrier Description:

At driveway: Slope greater than 1:12 (8.3%).

As-Built:

12.3%
Proposed Solution:

Demolish existing and provide new curb ramp at new location, including truncated dome surface.

ADA 2010:406.1
Priority: 1
3 ID:5436
Accessibility Element: Parking
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-502.2; 11B-502.3.1
$1,001.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $1001 / JOB
Specific Item: Accessible Parking Space
Barrier Description:

Accessible parking space is less than 9' wide and 18' long and/or does not have compliant 5' wide access aisle.

As-Built:
7' 3" wide
Proposed Solution:

Restripe to provide compliant accessible parking space.

ADA 2010:502.2; 502.3.1
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
3 ID:5438
Accessibility Element: Sidewalk & Walks
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$2,800.00
Quantity: 40 SF
Unit Cost: $70 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Cross
Barrier Description:

Along gutter: Cross slope more than 1/4":12" (2%).

As-Built:

7.9%
Proposed Solution:

Modify cross slope.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 1
3 ID:5435
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-9

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 91, Packet Page 296 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
End of Location: 3 - Accessible Street Parking on Dickerson $20,950.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-10

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 92, Packet Page 297 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 4 - POT from Main Entrance to Scholze Park
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-216.6
$382.00
Quantity: 2 JOB
Unit Cost: $191 / JOB
Specific Item: Directional Sign
Barrier Description:

No sign by inaccessible route directing persons to an
accessible route.

Proposed Solution:

Provide directional sign to entrance to lighthouse or through facility.

ADA 2010:216.6
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5439
End of Location: 4 - POT from Main Entrance to Scholze Park $382.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-11

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 93, Packet Page 298 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 5 - Stairs to Staff Entrance by Parking Lot
Accessibility Element: Handrails
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.7.1
Specific Item: Cross Section
Barrier Description:

Circular: Outside diameter of handrails not within 1.25" and 2".

As-Built:

1.75" wide
Proposed Solution:

Provide handrails.

ADA 2010:505.7.1
Priority: 4
Status: Closed - Code Change
CBC 2022
5 ID:5443
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.4
$2,256.00
Quantity: 16 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Height
Barrier Description:

Top of gripping surface not at a consistent height between 34" and 38" high above walking surfaces, stair nosings, and ramp surfaces.

As-Built:
33" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Remount or provide new handrails
ADA 2010:505.4
Priority: 4
5 ID:5442
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.10.2; 11B
-505.10.3
Specific Item: Stair Extensions
Barrier Description:

Handrails do not extend a minimum of 12" horizontally beyond the top, beginning directly above the first riser nosing and at the bottom, do not extend a minimum of one tread depth at the same slope as the stair flight and a minimum of 12"
horizontally.

As-Built:
10" extensions
Proposed Solution:

Modify handrail extensions.

ADA 2010:505.10.2; 505.10.3
Priority: 4
5 ID:5441
Accessibility Element: Stairways
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-504.4.1
$504.00
Quantity: 18 LF
Unit Cost: $28 / LF
Specific Item: Contrasting Stripe
Barrier Description:

Exterior: The upper approach and all treads lack stripes providing clear visual contrast which shall be between 2" and 4" wide placed parallel to, and not more than 1" from, the nose of the step or upper approach and shall extend the full width of the step.

Proposed Solution:

Paint 2" to 4" wide contrasting stripe on every tread along the stairway.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
5 ID:5440
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-12

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 94, Packet Page 299 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-504.2
$4,446.00
Quantity: 18 LF
Unit Cost: $247 / LF
Specific Item: Treads
Barrier Description:

Steps on a stairway do not have a uniform tread depth that is a minimum 11" deep.

As-Built:

9.5" tread
Proposed Solution:

Modify stairs.

ADA 2010:504.2
Priority: 4
5 ID:5444
End of Location: 5 - Stairs to Staff Entrance by Parking Lot $7,206.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-13

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 95, Packet Page 300 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 6 - Two Steps to Parking lot from Sidewalk on Foam St.

Accessibility Element: Stairways
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-504.6
$776.00
Quantity: 8 LF
Unit Cost: $97 / LF
Specific Item: Handrails
Barrier Description:

Handrails at stairs not provided or not compliant.

Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant handrails with gripping surface installed between 34" min. and 38" max. vertically above the walking surfaces and stair nosings, and 1.5" min. from adjacent surfaces.

ADA 2010:504.6
Priority: 1
6 ID:5445
End of Location: 6 - Two Steps to Parking lot from Sidewalk on Foam St. $776.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-14

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 96, Packet Page 301 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 7 - POT from Foam St. Sidewalk to Studio
Accessibility Element: Sidewalk & Walks
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-303.1; 11B-403.4
Specific Item: Change in Level
Barrier Description:

Change in level greater than 0.5" but less than 2".

As-Built:

0.5" change in level
Proposed Solution:

Grind level change to under 5% running slope.

ADA 2010:303.1; 403.4
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
7 ID:5447
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$5,600.00
Quantity: 80 SF
Unit Cost: $70 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Cross
Barrier Description:

Cross slope more than 1/4":12" (2%).

As-Built:

4.1% - 4.2%
Proposed Solution:

Provide ramped walkway to studio when remodeled.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 2
7 ID:5446
End of Location: 7 - POT from Foam St. Sidewalk to Studio $5,600.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-15

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 97, Packet Page 302 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 8 - Staff Entrance Stairs to Alliance on Aging Accessibility Element: Handrails
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.7.1
$3,948.00
Quantity: 28 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Cross Section
Barrier Description:

Circular: Outside diameter of handrails not within 1.25" and 2".

As-Built:
1" - 3.25" wide
Proposed Solution:

Provide handrails.

ADA 2010:505.7.1
Priority: 4
8 ID:5448
Accessibility Element: Stairways
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-504.6
$776.00
Quantity: 8 LF
Unit Cost: $97 / LF
Specific Item: Handrails
Barrier Description:

Handrails at stairs not provided or not compliant.

Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant handrails with gripping surface installed between 34" min. and 38" max. vertically above the walking surfaces and stair nosings, and 1.5" min. from adjacent surfaces.

ADA 2010:504.6
Priority: 4
8 ID:5449
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-504.5
$4,800.00
Quantity: 40 LF
Unit Cost: $120 / LF
Specific Item: Nosings
Barrier Description:

Nosings on each riser projects more than 1.25" over the tread below.

As-Built:

1.75" without bevel
Proposed Solution:

Modify nosings.

ADA 2010:504.5
Priority: 4
8 ID:5450
End of Location: 8 - Staff Entrance Stairs to Alliance on Aging $9,524.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-16

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 98, Packet Page 303 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 9 - Ramp from Senior Center Exit to Rear of Park Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.4.1
Specific Item: Maneuvering Clearance
Barrier Description:

Front Approach, Pull Side: Door does not provide a minimum 60" long (measured perpendicular to doorway) x 18" wide (measured beyond latch side) maneuvering clearance (Exterior doors shall instead provide a minimum 24" wide clearance on exterior sides).

As-Built:
59" from face of door to ramp
Proposed Solution:

Modify area to provide required door maneuvering clearance.

ADA 2010:404.2.4.1
Priority: 2
9 ID:5454
Accessibility Element: Handrails
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.10.1
Specific Item: Ramp Extensions
Barrier Description:

Handrails do not extend a minimum of 12" horizontally beyond the top or bottom of ramp runs.

As-Built:
9" extensions
Proposed Solution:

Modify handrail extensions.

ADA 2010:505.10.1
Priority: 2
9 ID:5453
Accessibility Element: Ramp
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-405.2; 11B-405.3
$36,585.00
Quantity: 27 LF
Unit Cost: $1355 / LF
Specific Item: Ramp Slope
Barrier Description:

Running slope exceeds 1:12 (8.33%) or cross slope exceeds 1:48 (2.083%).

As-Built:

Running Slope: 11.5%
Proposed Solution:

Provide compliant ramp with handrails and landings.

ADA 2010:405.2; 405.3
Priority: 2
9 ID:5451
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-17

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 99, Packet Page 304 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-405.9.2
Specific Item: Wheelguides
Barrier Description:

A continuous curb, 2" high minimum, or barrier not provided that prevents the passage of a 4" diameter sphere, where any portion of the sphere is within 4" of the finish floor or ground surface.

Proposed Solution:

Provide continuous curbs or wheel guides on each side of the ramp run to prevent wheels from being obstructed.

ADA 2010:405.9.2
Priority: 2
9 ID:5452
End of Location: 9 - Ramp from Senior Center Exit to Rear of Park $36,585.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-18

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 100, Packet Page 305 Area : On-Site
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
End of Area: On-Site $134,974.00
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-19

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 101, Packet Page 306 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 1 - Main Entrance and Lobby
Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.4.4
$2,223.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2223 / JOB
Specific Item: Door Landing
Barrier Description:

Landing within maneuvering clearance of door has slopes greater than 1:48 (2.083%) or is highly irregular.

As-Built:

8.1%
Proposed Solution:

Reslope area within maneuvering clearance.

ADA 2010:404.2.4.4
Priority: 1
1 ID:5313
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.4.4
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Doormat
Barrier Description:

At coffee station: Doormat not securely attached to ground or floor structure.

Proposed Solution:

Attach doormat to floor surface or remove doormat.

ADA 2010:404.2.4.4
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5320
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.10
$306.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $306 / JOB
Specific Item: Smooth Bottom Surface
Barrier Description:

Door does not have a smooth surface within 10" of the finish floor or ground on the push side extending the full width of the door.

Proposed Solution:

Provide 10" kick-plate installed at the bottom of the door.

ADA 2010:404.2.10
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5314
Accessibility Element: Drinking Fountain
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-602.2
$2,691.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2691 / JOB
Specific Item: Knee and Toe Clearance
Barrier Description:

Drinking fountain does not provide the required knee and toe clearance.

As-Built:

Knee space: 26.5" high
Proposed Solution:

Remount drinking fountain to provide a knee clearance that extends under for a min. 8" deep at min. 27" above the floor, reducing to the toe clearance that is a min. 9" above the floor.

ADA 2010:602.2
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5317
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-20

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 102, Packet Page 307 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-602.9
$2,691.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2691 / JOB
Specific Item: Pedestrian Protection
Barrier Description:

Drinking fountain encroaches the pedestrian way or is not located within an alcove / wing walls that provides a min. 32" wide by min. 18" deep protect area.

Proposed Solution:

Provide wing walls.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5316
Accessibility Element: Reach Range
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-308.2; 11B-308.3
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Unobstructed Approach
Barrier Description:

Information brochure bins mounted above accessible height (48" for front approach or 54" for side approach).

As-Built:
65" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Relocate/remount bins at accessible height.

ADA 2010:308.2; 308.3
Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5319
Accessibility Element: Sales and Service Areas
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-904.4.1
$3,990.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $3990 / JOB
Specific Item: Counter - Parallel Approach
Barrier Description:

A counter positioned for parallel approach does not provide a min. 36" long and max. 34" high accessible portion (When the counter is less than 36" long, the entire counter is not accessible).

As-Built:
41" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Provide an accessible sales/service counter that is a min. 36" long with the top surface max. 34" above the floor, extending the same depth as the sales or service counter top.

ADA 2010:904.4.1
Priority: 1
1 ID:5318
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:1013.4
$211.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $211 / JOB
Specific Item: Exit Signage
Barrier Description:

Required raised character and braille exit sign is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide tactile exit sign with the words "EXIT" and
accompanying Braille.

Priority: 1
Maintenance Item
1 ID:5315
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-21

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 103, Packet Page 308 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
End of Location: 1 - Main Entrance and Lobby $12,334.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-22

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 104, Packet Page 309 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 2 - Meeting Room One (Conference Room)
Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.7
$158.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $158 / JOB
Specific Item: Door Hardware
Barrier Description:

Non-common use areas within this facility, such as offices, do not have accessible door hardware.

Proposed Solution:

Provide lever handle or other accessible hardware when a specific need is identified in the future or when altering area.

ADA 2010:404.2.7
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5326
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.9
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Door Pressure
Barrier Description:

At exit: Excessive force required to open door.

As-Built:
9 lbs
Proposed Solution:

Adjust regular door closer to accessible standards (5 lbs max).

ADA 2010:404.2.9
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5323
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.5
Specific Item: Door Threshold
Barrier Description:

Threshold at door exceeds 0.5".

As-Built:
2"
Proposed Solution:

Modify adjacent floor surfaces or provide compliant threshold with a max. of 0.25" vertical height or a max. of 0.5" height when beveled at 1:2 max.

ADA 2010:404.2.5
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5324
Accessibility Element: Reach Range
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-308.2; 11B-308.3
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Unobstructed Approach
Barrier Description:

Object with operable parts not mounted between 15" and 48" above the floor to the operable part for an unobstructed approach.

As-Built:

Fire extinguisher: 60" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Reinstall and/or relocate object.

ADA 2010:308.2; 308.3
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5325
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-23

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 105, Packet Page 310 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Accessibility Element: Sidewalk & Walks
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.3
$4,500.00
Quantity: 15 SF
Unit Cost: $300 / SF
Specific Item: Slope - Running
Barrier Description:

Transition to conference room: Slope greater than 1:20 (5.0%), and walk does not comply with requirements for ramps.

As-Built:
12%
Proposed Solution:

Modify transition along room partition so as not to be a tripping hazard.

ADA 2010:403.3
Priority: 2
2 ID:5327
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:1013.4
$211.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $211 / JOB
Specific Item: Exit Signage
Barrier Description:

Required raised character and braille exit sign is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide tactile exit sign with the words "EXIT" and
accompanying Braille.

Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5322
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:1013.4
$211.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $211 / JOB
Specific Item: Exit Signage
Barrier Description:

Required raised character and braille exit sign is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide tactile exit sign with the words "EXIT ROUTE" and accompanying Braille.

Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
2 ID:5321
End of Location: 2 - Meeting Room One (Conference Room) $5,302.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-24

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 106, Packet Page 311 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 3 - Small Kitchen Serving Meeting Room 1
Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.5
$286.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $286 / JOB
Specific Item: Door Threshold
Barrier Description:

Threshold at door exceeds 0.5".

As-Built:

Threshold at door 27%
Proposed Solution:

Modify adjacent floor surfaces or provide compliant threshold with a max. of 0.25" vertical height or a max. of 0.5" height when beveled at 1:2 max.

ADA 2010:404.2.5
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
3 ID:5328
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.4.1
$5,065.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $5065 / JOB
Specific Item: Maneuvering Clearance
Barrier Description:

Exit to stairway: Front approach: At pull side, door does not have clear and level maneuvering space measuring door width plus 18" x 60" (CA only: exterior door width plus 24").

As-Built:
40" from face of door to stair rail
Proposed Solution:

Provide relocated new door and frame; remodel walls as
needed.

ADA 2010:404.2.4.1
Priority: 2
3 ID:5333
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.4.1
$5,065.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $5065 / JOB
Specific Item: Maneuvering Clearance
Barrier Description:

Kitchen door front approach: At pull side, door does not have clear and level maneuvering space measuring door width plus 18" x 60" (CA only: exterior door width plus 24").

As-Built:

Door width + 1" to wall
Proposed Solution:

Provide relocated new door and frame; remodel walls as
needed.

ADA 2010:404.2.4.1
Priority: 2
3 ID:5334
Accessibility Element: Fire Alarms
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:907.5.2.3.1
$2,366.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2366 / JOB
Specific Item: Alarm Notification
Barrier Description:

Visible alarm notification appliances are not provided in public use and common use area where audible alarms are provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide strobe.

Priority: 3
3 ID:5331
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-25

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 107, Packet Page 312 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Accessibility Element: Lavatories and Sinks
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-606.2; 11B-606.3;
11B-606.7
$4,816.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $4816 / JOB
Specific Item: Height & Knee Clearance
Barrier Description:

Sink rim or counter surface exceeds 34" in height and/or does not provide complying knee and toe clearance for forward approach (Exception: A kitchen sink in a space where no cook top is provided may allow for parallel approach).

As-Built:
37" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Replace sink with an accessible unit with the top rim between 28" and 34" above the floor, and a knee clearance that extends under for a min. 8" deep at min. 27" above the floor, reducing to the toe clearance that is a min. 9" above the floor.

ADA 2010:606.2; 606.3
Priority: 2
3 ID:5329
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-606.2; 11B-606.3;
11B-606.7
Specific Item: Height & Knee Clearance
Barrier Description:

Sink rim or counter surface exceeds 34" in height and/or does not provide complying knee and toe clearance for forward approach (Exception: A kitchen sink in a space where no cook top is provided may allow for parallel approach).

Proposed Solution:

Replace sink with an accessible unit with the top rim between 28" and 34" above the floor, and a knee clearance that extends under for a min. 8" deep at min. 27" above the floor, reducing to the toe clearance that is a min. 9" above the floor.

ADA 2010:606.2; 606.3
Priority: 2
3 ID:5330
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:1013.4
$211.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $211 / JOB
Specific Item: Exit Signage
Barrier Description:

Required raised character and braille exit sign is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide tactile exit sign with the words "EXIT STAIR DOWN / UP" and accompanying Braille.

Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
3 ID:5332
End of Location: 3 - Small Kitchen Serving Meeting Room 1 $17,809.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-26

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 108, Packet Page 313 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 4 - Staff Restroom (by front desk)
Accessibility Element: Grab Bars
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-609.3
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Spacing
Barrier Description:

Spacing below the grab bar and a protruding object is less than

1.5" or spacing above the grab bar and a protruding object is less than 12".

As-Built:

TP: 3" above SGB
Proposed Solution:

Relocate object or remount grab bar.

ADA 2010:609.3
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5343
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-216.8
$191.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $191 / JOB
Specific Item: Directional Sign
Barrier Description:

Toilet stall less than 60" wide.

As-Built:
59" wide
Proposed Solution:

Interim solution: Provide directional sign to accessible restroom.

ADA 2010:216.8
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5338
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-216.2
$211.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $211 / JOB
Specific Item: Restroom Designation Sign
Barrier Description:

Latch sign identifying restrooms that have text designations do not contain required tactile characters and/or Braille or is not provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide and/or replace sign.

ADA 2010:216.2
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5336
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-703.7.2.6.3
$211.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $211 / JOB
Specific Item: Restroom Sign
Barrier Description:

Geometric sign for unisex restroom is not a triangle
superimposed on a circle of 12" diameter or the triangle does not contrast in color with the circle or the circle with the door.

Proposed Solution:

Replace sign.

Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5337
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-27

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 109, Packet Page 314 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Accessibility Element: Toilet and Bathing Rooms
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-603.5
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Accessories
Barrier Description:

At least one of each type of accessory provided in toilet facilities shall be located on an accessible route and installed with the operable part no greater than 40" high.

As-Built:

SD: 54"
Proposed Solution:

Remount accessory.

Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5342
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-403.5.1
$2,300.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2300 / JOB
Specific Item: Clear Width
Barrier Description:

Accessible routes leading to the accessible water closet compartments within a restroom are less than 44" wide at areas that are not related to door opening-widths and door swings.

As-Built:

35.5" wide
Proposed Solution:

Widen accessible route by providing a 44" min. path leading to the accessible water closet.

ADA 2010:403.5
Priority: 4
4 ID:5335
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-603.3
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Mirrors
Barrier Description:

Mirrors serving accessible lavatories are installed with the bottom edge of the reflecting surface greater than 40" high.

As-Built:
53" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Remount mirror.

ADA 2010:603.3
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5341
Accessibility Element: Water Closets & Toilet Compartments Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-604.2
Specific Item: Centerline
Barrier Description:

The centerline of the water closet is not installed between 17" to 18" from the side wall. (Exception: 17" to 19" for semiambulatory stalls).

As-Built:

WC: 16" o.c.

Proposed Solution:

Reinstall water closet.

ADA 2010:604.2
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5344
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-28

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 110, Packet Page 315 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-604.5
Specific Item: Grab Bars
Barrier Description:

Grab bars are not provided or non-compliant.

Proposed Solution:

Provide grab bars on the side wall closest to the water closet and on the rear wall. The side wall grab bar shall be 42" long min., located 12" max. from the rear wall and extending to a point 54" min. from the rear wall and 24" min. in front of the water closet. The rear grab bar shall be 36" long min and located such that relative to the centerline of the toilet, the grab bar extends 12" min on one side and 24" min on the oopposite side.

ADA 2010:604.5
Priority: 4
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5340
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-604.3.2
Specific Item: Overlap
Barrier Description:

Unpermitted fixture is within the required min. 60" wide clearance around a water closet (Permitted: Grab bars,
dispensers, sanitary napkin disposal units, coat hooks, shelves, accessible routes, clear floor space and clearances required at other fixtures and the turning space).

As-Built:
12" from LAV to WC
Proposed Solution:

Remove and/or relocate permanent fixture(s).

ADA 2010:604.3.2
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
4 ID:5339
End of Location: 4 - Staff Restroom (by front desk) $3,246.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-29

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 111, Packet Page 316 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 5 - Staff Area by Main Lobby
Accessibility Element: Fire Alarms
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:907.5.2.3.1
$2,366.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2366 / JOB
Specific Item: Alarm Notification
Barrier Description:

Visible alarm notification appliances are not provided in public use and common use area where audible alarms are provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide strobe.

Priority: 4
5 ID:5345
End of Location: 5 - Staff Area by Main Lobby $2,366.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-30

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 112, Packet Page 317 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 6 - Ramp To Activity Rooms
Accessibility Element: Handrails
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.7.1
Specific Item: Cross Section
Barrier Description:

Circular: Outside diameter of handrails not within 1.25" and 2".

Proposed Solution:

Provide handrails.

ADA 2010:505.7.1
Priority: 2
6 ID:5347
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.4
$6,486.00
Quantity: 46 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Height
Barrier Description:

Top of gripping surface not at a consistent height between 34" and 38" high above walking surfaces, stair nosings, and ramp surfaces.

As-Built:

33.5" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Remount or provide new handrails
ADA 2010:505.4
Priority: 2
6 ID:5346
End of Location: 6 - Ramp To Activity Rooms $6,486.00
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-31

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 113, Packet Page 318 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 7 - Ramp To Alliance on Aging
Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.4.1
$10,351.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $10351 / JOB
Specific Item: Maneuvering Clearance
Barrier Description:

Front Approach, Pull Side: Door does not provide a minimum 60" long (measured perpendicular to doorway) x 18" wide (measured beyond latch side) maneuvering clearance (Exterior doors shall instead provide a minimum 24" wide clearance on exterior sides).

As-Built:

Door width + 16"
Proposed Solution:

Provide an automatic door operator.

ADA 2010:404.2.4.1
Priority: 2
7 ID:5348
Accessibility Element: Handrails
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.7.1
$8,460.00
Quantity: 60 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Cross Section
Barrier Description:

Circular: Outside diameter of handrails not within 1.25" and 2".

As-Built:

5.5" x 1.5" wide
Proposed Solution:

Provide handrails.

ADA 2010:505.7.1
Priority: 2
7 ID:5349
Accessibility Element: Ramp
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-405.9.2
$2,820.00
Quantity: 20 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Wheelguides
Barrier Description:

Along guardrail: No curb (2" minimum height) or wheel guide (centered approx. 3" above surface of ramp) at sides of ramp.

Proposed Solution:

Provide 2" minimum curb or wheel guide. Also provide hand rail and guide to protect people from running into protruding corner.

ADA 2010:405.9.2
Priority: 2
7 ID:5350
End of Location: 7 - Ramp To Alliance on Aging $21,631.00 JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-32

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 114, Packet Page 319 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 8 - Alliance on Aging
Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.1
$10,130.00
Quantity: 2 JOB
Unit Cost: $5065 / JOB
Specific Item: 0. Non-compliant Door
Barrier Description:

At Office and Kitchen: Door inaccessible due to threshold or step at door more than 6" high.

As-Built:
6" threshold
Proposed Solution:

Provide ramp including handrails and compliant landings, matching floor level inside door (+/-1/4").

ADA 2010:404.1
Priority: 4
8 ID:5353
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.3
$4,068.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $4068 / JOB
Specific Item: Clear Width
Barrier Description:

At staff stairway: Door on accessible route has less than 32" clear opening width when 90° open (CA only:...or has leaf size less than 36" wide or 80" high).

As-Built:
29" clear opening width
Proposed Solution:

Provide new, larger door and frame with new accessible
hardware.

ADA 2010:404.2.3
Priority: 1
8 ID:5358
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.7
$948.00
Quantity: 6 JOB
Unit Cost: $158 / JOB
Specific Item: Door Hardware
Barrier Description:

Non-common use areas within this facility, such as offices, do not have accessible door hardware.

Proposed Solution:

Provide lever handle or other accessible hardware when a specific need is identified in the future or when altering area.

ADA 2010:404.2.7
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
8 ID:5352
Accessibility Element: Fire Alarms
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:907.5.2.3.1
$7,098.00
Quantity: 3 JOB
Unit Cost: $2366 / JOB
Specific Item: Alarm Notification
Barrier Description:

At facility main office, lobby, and kitchen: a fire alarm system, visual signal (strobe) not provided at required type of common use area.

Proposed Solution:

Provide combination visual / audible signal device connected to existing fire alarm system.

Priority: 3
8 ID:5359
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-33

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 115, Packet Page 320 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Accessibility Element: Handrails
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.2
$846.00
Quantity: 6 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Handrails
Barrier Description:

Handrails not provided on both sides of ramp or stairs.

Proposed Solution:

Provide handrails.

ADA 2010:505.2
Priority: 2
8 ID:5355
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.4
$846.00
Quantity: 6 LF
Unit Cost: $141 / LF
Specific Item: Height
Barrier Description:

Top of gripping surface not at a consistent height between 34" and 38" high above walking surfaces, stair nosings, and ramp surfaces.

As-Built:
32" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Remount or provide new handrails
ADA 2010:505.4
Priority: 2
8 ID:5357
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-505.10.2; 11B
-505.10.3
Specific Item: Stair Extensions
Barrier Description:

Handrails do not extend a minimum of 12" horizontally beyond the top, beginning directly above the first riser nosing and at the bottom, do not extend a minimum of one tread depth at the same slope as the stair flight and a minimum of 12"
horizontally.

Proposed Solution:

Modify handrail extensions.

ADA 2010:505.10.2; 505.10.3
Priority: 2
8 ID:5356
Accessibility Element: Protruding Objects
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-307.4
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Vertical Clearance
Barrier Description:

Beam in waiting room: Overhead clearance less than 80"
above finished floor.

As-Built:

75.5" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Modify overhead clearance.

ADA 2010:307.4
Priority: 2
Maintenance Item
8 ID:5351
End of Location: 8 - Alliance on Aging $24,047.00
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-34

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 116, Packet Page 321 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 9 - Restroom Lobby
Accessibility Element: Drinking Fountain
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-602.2
$2,691.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2691 / JOB
Specific Item: Clear Floor Space
Barrier Description:
30" wide x 48" long clear floor space not provided at drinking fountain.

As-Built:
15" to couch
Proposed Solution:

Relocate couch to provide clear floor space at drinking fountain.

ADA 2010:602.2
Priority: 3
9 ID:5361
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-602.9
$2,691.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2691 / JOB
Specific Item: Pedestrian Protection
Barrier Description:

Drinking fountain encroaches the pedestrian way or is not located within an alcove / wing walls that provides a min. 32" wide by min. 18" deep protect area.

Proposed Solution:

Provide wing walls.

Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
9 ID:5360
Accessibility Element: Fire Alarms
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:907.5.2.3.1
$2,366.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $2366 / JOB
Specific Item: Alarm Notification
Barrier Description:

Visible alarm notification appliances are not provided in public use and common use area where audible alarms are provided.

Proposed Solution:

Provide strobe.

Priority: 3
9 ID:5362
End of Location: 9 - Restroom Lobby $7,748.00
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-35

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 117, Packet Page 322 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Location # 10 - Women's Restroom
Accessibility Element: Accessories
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

Specific Item: Toilet Paper Dispenser
Barrier Description:

Toilet paper dispenser or disposal container protrudes more than 3" out from side wall, into clear 30" x 48" space in front of water closet.

As-Built:
5" protrusion
Proposed Solution:

Recommended: Provide recessed toilet paper dispenser. (99 -07 Formally Deleted 8/25/05)
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
Status: Closed - Code Change -
Recommendation only
10 ID:5372
Accessibility Element: Doors
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.9
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Door Pressure
Barrier Description:

Force required to open door exceeds 5 lbs (Exception:

Required fire doors, min. opening force allowable by the appropriate administrative authority, shall not exceed 15 lbs).

As-Built:
8 lbs
Proposed Solution:

Adjust door closer.

ADA 2010:404.2.9
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
10 ID:5365
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-404.2.10
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Smooth Bottom Surface - Door Stopper
Barrier Description:

Door does not have a smooth surface within 10" of the finish floor or ground on the push side extending the full width of the door.

Proposed Solution:

Remove door stopper.

ADA 2010:404.2.10
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
10 ID:5364
Accessibility Element: Protruding Objects
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-307.2
Specific Item: Protruding Object
Barrier Description:

Object with leading edges between 27" and 80" above the ground protrudes more than 4" into the circulation path.

As-Built:

EHD: 10" protrusion at 45" AFF
Proposed Solution:

Remove or relocate object.

ADA 2010:307.2
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
10 ID:5366
JENSEN HUGHES Fac 101 Page R-36

APPENDIX E
Council Regular Meeting, 12/17/2024, Item No. 17., Item Page 118, Packet Page 323 Area : Ground Floor
City Facilities: #101: Senior Center
CITY OF MONTEREY - ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE 2024 February 16, 2024

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Address: 280 Dickman Ave
TP13

CITY FACILITIES
Accessibility Element: Signs
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-703.3
$164.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $164 / JOB
Specific Item: Braille
Barrier Description:

Tactile sign does not have compliant contracted Grade II Braille.

Proposed Solution:

Replace sign.

ADA 2010:703.3
Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
10 ID:5363
Accessibility Element: Toilet and Bathing Rooms
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-603.5
$333.00
Quantity: 3 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Accessories
Barrier Description:

At least one of each type of accessory provided in toilet facilities shall be located on an accessible route and installed with the operable part no greater than 40" high.

As-Built:

EHD: 47"
SD: 44"
PTD: 41"
Proposed Solution:

Remount accessory.

Priority: 3
Maintenance Item
10 ID:5367
Photo not available: 2013
Data. See Barrier Location
Maps for general location.

CBC 2022:11B-603.4
$111.00
Quantity: 1 JOB
Unit Cost: $111 / JOB
Specific Item: Coat Hook
Barrier Description:

Coat hook mounted above 48" high.

As-Built:
64" AFF
Proposed Solution:

← All documents from this meeting