Agenda — Richmond City Council, June 16, 2026 (part 8 of 13)

June 16, 2026
Finance Department
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Emily Combs, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
Jerry Gurule, Accounting Manager
Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
Subject: Investment and Cash Balance Report, Monthly Overtime Reports, Documentary Transfer Tax Report, and Other
Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) and Pension Report
for the month of April 2026
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact due to this agenda item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff is requesting that the City Council receive the City’s Investment and Cash Balance Report, Monthly
Overtime Reports, Documentary Transfer Tax Report,
and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) and
Pension Report for the month of April 2026.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE the City’s Investment and Cash Balance Report, Monthly Overtime Reports, Documentary
Transfer Tax Report, and Other Post-Employment
Benefits (OPEB) and Pension Report for the month of
April 2026 – Finance Department (Emily Combs
510-620-6740).

AGENDA
REPORT
1701

Page 2 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
DISCUSSION:

Investment and Cash Balance Report
It is the policy of the City of Richmond (City) to invest public funds in a manner which prioritizes safety and liquidity over yield while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. In accordance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the City’s Investment Policy, the Director of Finance shall report monthly on the City's pooled and Bond funds to the City Manager and City Council and shall report quarterly on other investments.

The Investment and Cash Balance Report is a monthly report of the City’s pooled cash balance, which includes General Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service, Capital Projects, Enterprise, Internal service, Trust & Agency, Redevelopment/Successor Agency, and any other Funds investment activities under the direction of the City (Attachment 1).

On June 24, 2025, the City officially awarded a contract to Meeder Public Funds, Inc. to provide investment management and advisory services. Meeder’s approach emphasizes diversification, asset allocation, and advanced risk mitigation techniques.

Meeder’s strategy focuses on the City’s cash flow needs to prioritize safety and liquidity.

These strategies are designed to safeguard the City’s principal investments, especially during periods of market volatility. Meeder’s approach ensures that our portfolio remains resilient and well-positioned to meet cash flow demands.

The Federal Reserve (i.e., Fed) seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated. The implications of developments in the Middle East for the U.S. economy are uncertain. The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate. In support of its goals, on Wednesday April 29, 2026, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.50 to 3.75 percent. In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The next Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 16, 2026, and Thursday, June 17, 2026.

Overtime Reports
The overtime reports for the month of April 2026 provides a comparative summary of budgeted overtime to actual overtime usage by department for miscellaneous and sworn staff. Year-over-year and month-over-month totals are included for sworn staff (Attachment 2 and 3).
1702

Page 3 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
Documentary Transfer Tax
On June 24, 2024, City Council requested monthly updates of the Transfer Tax received by the City of Richmond from Contra Costa County for the sale of properties in Richmond. As this is the most volatile revenue stream for the City, the amounts received month-to-month can vary from as low as $250,000 to upwards of $7 million – a few large sales can widely swing the revenues.

In May 2026, the City received the documentary transfer tax data report from the County which identified that the tax revenue for April 2026 would total $513,926 (Attachment 4).

Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) & Pension Report
On April 22, 2025, the City Manager requested monthly updates to the City Council on the returns of the OPEB and Pension accounts. The City manages two OPEB plans; the Richmond Police Officers’ Association (RPOA) Plan administered by CalPERS in a California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT), and the City Plan administered by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS). In May 2024, PARS was also tasked with administering the Pension account. The City receives monthly account statements for the PARS accounts, while the CalPERS account statement is received quarterly. As the statements are received after period close, the amounts are reported on a delayed timeframe.

In March 2026, the PARS OPEB account reported a loss of ($2,782,271.44), for a negative rate of (4.38 percent). The 3-month return rate is negative (1.03 percent), and the annualized return rate for FY 2025-26 is 6.01 percent based on 9 months of activity.

The PARS Pension account reported a loss of ($292,164.72), for a negative rate of (4.60 percent). The 3-month return rate is negative by (0.71 percent), and the annualized return rate for FY 2025-26 is 7.04 percent based on 9 months of activity.

In March 2026, the CalPERS CERBT account reported quarterly earnings of $53,381.31, for a 3-month return rate of 0.37 percent, and the annualized return rate for FY 2025-26 is 6.71 percent based on 3 quarters of activity (Attachment 5).

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Investment and Cash Balance Report for April 2026 Attachment 2 – Overtime Report for April 2026
Attachment 3 – Overtime Public Safety Report for April 2026 Attachment 4 – Documentary Transfer Tax Report for April 2026 Attachment 5 – Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) and Pension Report for April 2026
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
Overtime Report for April 2026 (Attachment 2)
PERIOD 10, APRIL 2026
83% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED BUDGET YTD EXPENDED AVAILABLE BUDGET PCT GENERAL FUND (summary)400031 OVERTIME/General 2,346,051 163,532 2,509,583 2,132,454 377,129 85%400032 OVERTIME/Sworn 11,465,610 - 11,465,610 10,060,446 1,405,164 88%TOTAL GENERAL FUND 13,811,661 163,532 13,975,193 12,192,900 1,782,294 87% Overtime By Department
CITY MANAGERAdministration - - - 357 (357) 100%
CITY CLERK Administration 25,000 - 25,000 20,652 4,348 83%CITY ATTORNEY - Administration - - - 312 (312) 100%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTGeneral Plan Code Enforcement 40,000 - 40,000 9,474 30,526 24%FINANCEAdministration - - - 1 (1) 100%General Accounting - - - 979 (979) 100%Payroll 28,000 - 28,000 22,116 5,884 79%Treasury/Cash Management - - - 2,956 (2,956) 100%Accounts Payable - - - 169 (169) 100%Revenue Collection 5,000 - 5,000 3,347 1,653 67%TOTAL FINANCE 33,000 - 33,000 29,567 3,433 90%HUMAN RESOURCESAdministration - 1,000 1,000 991 9 99%POLICE Administration 583,083 - 583,083 571,795 11,288 98%CAD Dispatch System 1,024,059 - 1,024,059 911,889 112,170 89%RM System 4,000 - 4,000 15,672 (11,672) 392%Parking Enforcement 15,000 - 15,000 29,631 (14,631) 198%Sworn Administration 6,983,641 - 6,983,641 6,555,973 427,668 94%TOTAL POLICE 8,609,783 - 8,609,783 8,084,959 524,824 94%FIRE Administration 5,000 - 5,000 3,028 1,972 61%Sworn Suppression 4,452,872 - 4,452,872 3,480,666 972,206 78%

Page 1 of 3 ends

1719
Overtime Report for April 2026 (Attachment 2)
83% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED BUDGET YTD EXPENDED AVAILABLE BUDGET PCT Sworn Prevention 29,097 - 29,097 21,667 7,430 74%Prevention - - - 311 (311) 100%Sworn Prv-Chvrn Insp - - - 2,140 (2,140) 100%TOTAL FIRE 4,486,969 - 4,486,969 3,507,812 979,157 78%OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETYAdministration 40,000 (462) 39,538 2,253 37,285 6%Re-Imagining - 462 462 462 - 100%TOTAL ONS 40,000 - 40,000 2,715 37,285 7%PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING SVCSAdministration - 16,000 16,000 13,872 2,128 87%Engineering Services 2,800 - 2,800 803 1,997 29%Stationary Engineers 15,000 - 15,000 13,271 1,729 88%Building Services 5,000 - 5,000 10,735 (5,735) 215%Utility Sections 100,000 - 100,000 55,167 44,833 55%Electric 25,000 10,000 35,000 46,950 (11,950) 134%Parks & Landscape Admin 200,000 51,625 251,625 191,470 60,155 76%Street Sweeping 1,100 - 1,100 - 1,100 0%Pavement Maintenance 56,447 30,000 86,447 61,244 25,203 71%Traffic Signs & Lines 15,000 20,000 35,000 21,732 13,268 62%Equipment Services 20,000 - 20,000 5,933 14,067 30%Abatement Services 50,000 45,000 95,000 61,546 33,454 65%TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 490,347 172,625 662,972 482,722 180,250 73%LIBRARYLibrary Administration 25,000 (14,093) 10,907 4,048 6,859 37%COMMUNITY SERVICES Recreation Services/Cities of Service - - - 1,592 (1,592) 100%Recreation Administration 400 - 400 11,893 (11,493) 2973%Booker T Center 100 - 100 440 (340) 440%Nevin Center 200 - 200 5 195 2%Shields Reid 200 - 200 455 (255) 228%Recreation Complex 2,000 - 2,000 949 1,051 47%Parchester Center 700 - 700 145 555 21%May Valley Center 700 - 700 752 (52) 107%Recreation DPRC 750 - 750 2,264 (1,514) 302%Senior Center 200 - 200 1 199 0%

Page 2 of 3 ends

1720
Overtime Report for April 2026 (Attachment 2)
83% Threshold

ORIGINAL

BUDGET TRANSFERS REVISED BUDGET YTD EXPENDED AVAILABLE BUDGET PCT Senior Center Annex 300 - 300 351 (51) 117%Aquatics 5,000 - 5,000 5,197 (197) 104%Convention Center 4,512 - 4,512 17,613 (13,101) 390%Plunge 3,500 - 3,500 2,333 1,167 67%TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 18,562 - 18,562 43,989 (25,427) 237%ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMAdministration 1,000 - 1,000 3 997 0%Public Art 2,000 4,000 6,000 4,168 1,832 69%TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3,000 4,000 7,000 4,171 2,829 60% COMMUNITY CRISIS RESPONSE PROGRAM Administration 40,000 - 40,000 1,130 38,870 3% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 13,811,661 163,532 13,975,193 12,192,900 1,782,293 87% NON-GENERAL FUND Overtime By Fund
1012 HILLTOP LANDSCAPE MAINT DIST 20,000 - 20,000 15,791 4,209 79% 1015 MARINA BAY LNDSCP & LIGHT DIST 26,312 - 26,312 19,821 6,491 75% 1018 RENT PROGRAM 3,750 - 3,750 523 3,227 14% 1050 CR-PLANNING & BUILDING 9,500 - 9,500 275 9,225 3% 1050 CR-PLANNING & BUILDING 15,000 - 15,000 26 14,974 0% 1055 ENCROACHMENT SVCS 50,000 (5,500) 44,500 4,834 39,666 11% -
1205 EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING - - - 836 (836) 100% 1303 KIDS FIRST INITIATIVE 5,000 - 5,000 213 4,787 4% 4001 PORT OF RICHMOND 1,000 - 1,000 - 1,000 0% 4003 WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 30,000 - 30,000 11,503 18,497 38% 4003 WASTEWATER PRE-TREATMENT 25,000 50,000 75,000 38,849 36,151 52%4006 STORMWATER 2,500 4,000 6,500 4,317 2,183 66%4404 RHA-NEVIN PLAZA - - - 191 (191) 100%4405 RHA-NYSTROM VILLAGE 12,000 - 12,000 1,763 10,237 15%5001 INSURANCE RESERVES - 240 240 239 1 100%TOTAL NON-GENERAL FUNDS 200,062 48,740 248,802 99,181 149,621 40%

Page 3 of 3 ends

1721
Overtime Public Safety Report for April 2026 (Attachment 3) City of RichmondPublic Safety Sworn OvertimeFund: 0001 - General Fund Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Average
Month July August September October November December January February March April May June YTD YTD Remaining Monthly Target % 8% 17% 25% 33% 42% 50% 58% 67% 75% 83% 92% 100% Total $ Total % Budget Expense

ORIGINAL
BUDGET

REVISED
BUDGET
FY2018-19 Overtime - Sworn 3,433,019 3,433,019 482,143 537,369 655,866 437,794 524,577 430,398 367,322 512,595 422,587 497,767 536,209 505,966 5,910,592 172.2% (2,477,573) 492,549.37FY2019-20 Overtime - Sworn 5,000,000 4,800,000 473,963 469,392 491,205 509,931 449,751 473,935 390,897 498,501 501,383 479,696 560,031 439,159 5,737,844 119.5% (937,844) 478,153.64FY2020-21 Overtime - Sworn 2,497,290 3,533,043 275,202 246,822 296,775 382,618 306,787 278,293 205,529 303,631 307,092 357,284 323,537 368,366 3,651,935 103.4% (118,892) 304,327.96FY2021-22 Overtime - Sworn 5,165,434 5,165,434 379,016 408,253 487,481 423,830 333,006 307,152 255,420 330,788 314,524 336,044 304,989 366,419 4,246,922 82.2% 918,512 353,910.14 POLICE FY2022-23 Overtime - Sworn 5,165,435 4,800,000 373,491 355,649 399,628 355,866 377,889 401,964 396,783 474,403 463,499 416,775 496,542 449,394 4,961,883 103.4% (161,883) 413,490.26 FY2023-24 Overtime - Sworn 4,800,000 6,708,965 487,105 925,716 477,693 462,417 470,347 531,204 424,452 626,680 478,293 593,735 568,535 588,097 6,634,274 98.9% 74,691 552,856.16FY2024-25 Overtime - Sworn 6,708,965 6,708,965 560,788 543,814 584,028 590,943 580,286 631,961 492,367 662,199 566,326 603,150 720,953 680,661 7,217,477 107.6% (508,512) 601,456.40FY2025-26 Overtime - Sworn 6,983,641 6,983,641 614,222 750,224 711,221 716,296 638,352 590,269 591,184 632,839 604,515 706,850 6,555,972 93.9% 427,669 655,597.24FY2018-19 Overtime - Sworn 2,509,914 2,509,914 257,785 245,946 179,272 171,370 219,937 204,997 261,780 216,596 196,343 310,702 220,368 275,166 2,760,261 110.0% (250,347) 230,021.77FY2019-20 Overtime - Sworn 4,305,402 2,509,914 295,166 277,886 286,016 300,083 332,654 382,084 347,492 328,467 350,709 302,505 264,571 325,335 3,792,969 151.1% (1,283,055) 316,080.74FY2020-21 Overtime - Sworn 1,993,165 3,193,165 398,678 380,282 417,982 393,922 267,819 345,928 341,403 305,081 172,961 261,923 263,518 286,039 3,835,537 120.1% (642,372) 319,628.09FY2021-22 Overtime - Sworn 3,629,097 4,334,499 334,236 434,974 358,578 358,251 352,789 327,832 448,493 410,429 297,215 355,475 725,409 438,807 4,842,489 111.7% (507,990) 403,540.77 FIRE FY2022-23 Overtime - Sworn 4,334,499 4,334,499 444,959 444,457 414,638 401,115 402,116 379,882 443,531 475,560 339,814 398,079 369,477 435,057 4,948,685 114.2% (614,186) 412,390.41 FY2023-24 Overtime - Sworn 4,482,969 5,135,869 524,969 473,094 348,296 346,854 363,759 315,266 363,100 382,930 381,442 417,762 431,523 357,820 4,706,814 91.6% 429,055 392,234.47FY2024-25 Overtime - Sworn 4,481,969 4,481,969 367,801 375,737 425,984 419,101 462,309 358,764 366,579 356,872 395,710 496,072 499,221 510,985 5,035,136 112.3% (553,167) 419,594.68FY2025-26 Overtime - Sworn 4,481,969 4,481,969 597,372 381,730 262,916 283,051 322,373 344,304 297,158 278,735 275,627 461,208 3,504,473 78.2% 977,496 350,447.31 FY2025-26 TOTAL 11,465,610 11,465,610 1,211,594 1,131,954 974,136 999,347 960,725 934,573 888,342 911,574 880,142 1,168,058 - - 10,060,446 87.7% 1,405,164 1,006,044.55

BUDGET ACTUALS TOTAL

Page 1 of 1 ends

1722
Documentary Transfer Tax
The City of Richmond receives Documentary Transfer Tax from the County for the sale of properties in Richmond. As one of the most volatile revenue streams for the City, the amounts received can vary month-to-month from the low $250 thousand to the highs of $7 million. A few large sales can widely swing the revenues.

In FY2023-24, the City budgeted $13.3 million for the Transfer Tax category and received $8.6 million, equating to a difference of $4.7 million.

In FY2024-25, the City budgeted $7.4 million. The difference between the budgeted amounts in these two years is that in the FY2024-25 budget, staff did not include property sales of over $10 million in the formula. These few unpredictable transactions skew the monthly sales figures.

For FY2025-26, the City budgeted $13.6 million following the Guiding Fiscal Policy formula.

As a reminder, Measure H, approved by Richmond voters in November 2018, went into effect at the end of December 2018. Measure H increased the real estate transfer tax from 0.7 percent to 1.25 percent for properties with a sale price of over $1 million but below $3 million, 2.5 percent for properties with a sale price between $3 - $10 million, and 3.0 percent for properties with a sale price over $10 million.

The table below shows each monthly payment going back to FY2018-19 and highlights the volatility of this revenue stream. Of note are the very high payments received in certain months which are shown as significant peaks.

Documentary Transfer Tax for April 2026 (Attachment 4) Page 1 of 6 1723
Fiscal Year July August September October November December January February March April May June Totals FY2018-19 498,037 508,343 348,117 440,189 462,542 437,400 225,541 487,419 809,257 733,536 1,524,100 1,542,404 8,016,886 FY2019-20 475,202 514,221 489,633 581,608 406,167 676,059 2,578,200 344,488 460,000 1,345,764 444,160 406,756 8,722,257 FY2020-21 1,464,754 529,696 5,088,852 508,011 2,522,185 883,461 569,095 357,803 621,601 4,312,603 2,130,037 878,737 19,866,835 FY2021-22 784,937 642,394 3,405,874 1,620,476 689,214 701,028 419,082 944,682 3,047,276 926,132 1,675,993 3,755,021 18,612,107 FY2022-23 1,086,045 520,354 517,718 580,839 1,250,243 785,993 682,509 244,636 2,034,519 970,348 1,253,543 490,102 10,416,847 FY2023-24 465,705 425,650 368,966 507,066 1,357,082 407,488 356,203 336,787 439,035 582,710 627,785 2,726,059 8,600,534 FY2024-25 3,353,340 420,135 424,251 4,394,236 1,791,677 448,977 273,946 412,343 486,190 339,108 611,460 538,589 13,494,250 FY2025-26 7,258,631 380,656 398,557 479,573 371,688 537,250 249,048 365,079 1,225,231 513,926 11,779,639 $0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
July August September October November December January February March April May June City of Richmond - Documentary Transfer Tax
FY2018-19 FY2019-20 FY2020-21 FY2021-22 FY2022-23 FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 Documentary Transfer Tax for April 2026 (Attachment 4) Page 1724
2 of 6
KRISTIN B. CONNELLY, CLERK-RECORDER
County of Contra Costa
555 Escobar Street * Martinez, CA 94553
Phone (925) 335-7900 * Fax (925) 335-7926
Transfer Tax Monthly Detail by City
Report Date & Time
05/07/2026 13:02
For Month: April 2026
Document No. Recording Date/Time Transaction Date/Time Action City Split County Split Transfer Tax Total Location
For Richmond
2026-0032417 04/01/2026 08:27 04/01/2026 08:27:00 $6,300.00 $990.00 $7,290.00 Main Office 2026-0033002 04/02/2026 09:36 04/02/2026 09:36:00 $4,256.00 $668.80 $4,924.80 Main Office 2026-0033100 04/02/2026 11:17 04/02/2026 11:17:00 $6,055.00 $951.50 $7,006.50 Main Office 2026-0033122 04/02/2026 11:57 04/02/2026 11:57:00 $6,650.00 $1,045.00 $7,695.00 Main Office 2026-0033166 04/02/2026 13:38 04/02/2026 13:38:00 $3,780.00 $594.00 $4,374.00 Main Office 2026-0033285 04/03/2026 07:59 04/03/2026 07:59:00 $6,510.00 $1,023.00 $7,533.00 Main Office 2026-0033435 04/03/2026 09:07 04/03/2026 09:07:00 $28,687.50 $2,524.50 $31,212.00 Main Office 2026-0033482 04/03/2026 10:15 04/03/2026 10:15:00 $2,527.00 $397.10 $2,924.10 Main Office 2026-0033507 04/03/2026 11:04 04/03/2026 11:04:00 $3,080.00 $484.00 $3,564.00 Main Office 2026-0033527 04/03/2026 11:20 04/03/2026 11:20:00 $5,180.00 $814.00 $5,994.00 Main Office 2026-0033545 04/03/2026 11:56 04/03/2026 11:56:00 $3,255.00 $511.50 $3,766.50 Main Office 2026-0033590 04/03/2026 13:07 04/03/2026 13:07:00 $3,570.00 $561.00 $4,131.00 Main Office 2026-0033605 04/03/2026 13:37 04/03/2026 13:37:00 $5,880.00 $924.00 $6,804.00 Main Office 2026-0033607 04/03/2026 13:34 04/03/2026 13:34:47 $889.00 $139.15 $1,028.15 Main Office 2026-0033786 04/06/2026 08:48 04/06/2026 08:48:00 $4,536.00 $712.80 $5,248.80 Main Office 2026-0034137 04/06/2026 14:08 04/06/2026 14:08:00 $4,200.00 $660.00 $4,860.00 Main Office 2026-0034216 04/06/2026 15:36 04/06/2026 15:36:59 $1,750.00 $275.00 $2,025.00 Main Office 2026-0034220 04/06/2026 16:00 04/06/2026 16:00:00 $14,400.00 $1,267.20 $15,667.20 Main Office 2026-0034367 04/07/2026 09:15 04/07/2026 09:15:00 $5,103.00 $801.90 $5,904.90 Main Office 2026-0034449 04/07/2026 10:18 04/07/2026 10:18:00 $5,600.00 $880.00 $6,480.00 Main Office 2026-0034606 04/07/2026 11:56 04/07/2026 11:56:00 $3,255.00 $511.50 $3,766.50 Main Office 2026-0034795 04/07/2026 15:34 04/07/2026 15:34:00 $3,290.00 $517.00 $3,807.00 Main Office 2026-0034987 04/08/2026 08:52 04/08/2026 08:52:00 $14.00 $1.65 $15.65 Main Office 2026-0035054 04/08/2026 09:37 04/08/2026 09:37:00 $6,909.00 $1,085.70 $7,994.70 Main Office Documentary Transfer Tax for April 2026 (Attachment 4) Page 1725
3 of 6
KRISTIN B. CONNELLY, CLERK-RECORDER
County of Contra Costa
555 Escobar Street * Martinez, CA 94553
Phone (925) 335-7900 * Fax (925) 335-7926
Transfer Tax Monthly Detail by City
Report Date & Time
05/07/2026 13:02
For Month: April 2026
Document No. Recording Date/Time Transaction Date/Time Action City Split County Split Transfer Tax Total Location
2026-0035058 04/08/2026 09:43 04/08/2026 09:43:00 $3,605.00 $566.50 $4,171.50 Main Office 2026-0035188 04/08/2026 11:26 04/08/2026 11:26:00 $2,870.00 $451.00 $3,321.00 Main Office 2026-0035443 04/09/2026 07:57 04/09/2026 07:57:00 $4,480.00 $704.00 $5,184.00 Main Office 2026-0035495 04/09/2026 08:44 04/09/2026 08:44:00 $4,200.00 $660.00 $4,860.00 Main Office 2026-0035692 04/09/2026 11:32 04/09/2026 11:32:00 $2,870.00 $451.00 $3,321.00 Main Office 2026-0035747 04/09/2026 12:54 04/09/2026 12:54:00 $26,675.00 $2,347.40 $29,022.40 Main Office 2026-0035762 04/09/2026 14:06 04/09/2026 14:06:00 $3,010.00 $473.00 $3,483.00 Main Office 2026-0035865 04/09/2026 15:23 04/09/2026 15:23:00 $2,975.00 $467.50 $3,442.50 Main Office 2026-0035913 04/10/2026 08:00 04/10/2026 08:00:00 $4,550.00 $715.00 $5,265.00 Main Office 2026-0035927 04/10/2026 08:11 04/10/2026 08:11:00 $15,687.50 $1,380.50 $17,068.00 Main Office 2026-0036015 04/10/2026 09:25 04/10/2026 09:25:00 $4,830.00 $759.00 $5,589.00 Main Office 2026-0036145 04/10/2026 10:31 04/10/2026 10:31:00 $4,039.00 $634.70 $4,673.70 Main Office 2026-0036215 04/10/2026 12:00 04/10/2026 12:00:00 $4,025.00 $632.50 $4,657.50 Main Office 2026-0036240 04/10/2026 12:17 04/10/2026 12:17:00 $5,390.00 $847.00 $6,237.00 Main Office 2026-0036361 04/10/2026 14:54 04/10/2026 14:54:00 $4,970.00 $781.00 $5,751.00 Main Office 2026-0036402 04/10/2026 15:10 04/10/2026 15:10:00 $6,615.00 $1,039.50 $7,654.50 Main Office 2026-0036828 04/13/2026 13:19 04/13/2026 13:19:00 $15,000.00 $1,320.00 $16,320.00 Main Office 2026-0036839 04/13/2026 13:26 04/13/2026 13:26:00 $5,600.00 $880.00 $6,480.00 Main Office 2026-0037390 04/14/2026 12:34 04/14/2026 12:34:00 $23,750.00 $2,090.00 $25,840.00 Main Office 2026-0037418 04/14/2026 13:10 04/14/2026 13:10:00 $1,820.00 $286.00 $2,106.00 Main Office 2026-0038084 04/15/2026 10:49 04/15/2026 10:49:00 $5,460.00 $858.00 $6,318.00 Main Office 2026-0038122 04/15/2026 11:29 04/15/2026 11:29:00 $4,375.00 $687.50 $5,062.50 Main Office 2026-0038274 04/15/2026 13:48 04/15/2026 13:48:00 $1,995.00 $313.50 $2,308.50 Main Office 2026-0038331 04/15/2026 14:55 04/15/2026 14:55:00 $4,900.00 $770.00 $5,670.00 Main Office 2026-0038423 04/16/2026 07:39 04/16/2026 07:39:00 $14,375.00 $1,265.00 $15,640.00 Main Office 2026-0038650 04/16/2026 11:33 04/16/2026 11:33:00 $13,562.50 $1,193.50 $14,756.00 Main Office Documentary Transfer Tax for April 2026 (Attachment 4) Page 1726
4 of 6
KRISTIN B. CONNELLY, CLERK-RECORDER
County of Contra Costa
555 Escobar Street * Martinez, CA 94553
Phone (925) 335-7900 * Fax (925) 335-7926
Transfer Tax Monthly Detail by City
Report Date & Time
05/07/2026 13:02
For Month: April 2026
Document No. Recording Date/Time Transaction Date/Time Action City Split County Split Transfer Tax Total Location
2026-0038666 04/16/2026 12:01 04/16/2026 12:01:00 $5,880.00 $924.00 $6,804.00 Main Office 2026-0038807 04/16/2026 14:20 04/16/2026 14:20:00 $2,863.00 $449.90 $3,312.90 Main Office 2026-0038876 04/16/2026 16:05 04/16/2026 16:05:00 $5,740.00 $902.00 $6,642.00 Main Office 2026-0038933 04/17/2026 08:02 04/17/2026 08:02:00 $4,564.00 $717.20 $5,281.20 Main Office 2026-0038971 04/17/2026 08:27 04/17/2026 08:27:00 $700.00 $110.00 $810.00 Main Office 2026-0039032 04/17/2026 09:05 04/17/2026 09:05:00 $4,984.00 $783.20 $5,767.20 Main Office 2026-0039127 04/17/2026 11:00 04/17/2026 11:00:00 $3,605.00 $566.50 $4,171.50 Main Office 2026-0039287 04/17/2026 13:21 04/17/2026 13:21:00 $19,375.00 $1,705.00 $21,080.00 Main Office 2026-0039644 04/20/2026 11:28 04/20/2026 11:28:00 $2,940.00 $462.00 $3,402.00 Main Office 2026-0039736 04/20/2026 13:28 04/20/2026 13:28:00 $5,852.00 $919.60 $6,771.60 Main Office 2026-0039869 04/20/2026 14:57 04/20/2026 14:57:00 $2,282.00 $358.60 $2,640.60 Main Office 2026-0039948 04/20/2026 16:16 04/20/2026 16:16:00 $3,864.00 $607.20 $4,471.20 Main Office 2026-0040684 04/22/2026 08:23 04/22/2026 08:23:00 $3,710.00 $583.00 $4,293.00 Main Office 2026-0040756 04/22/2026 08:49 04/22/2026 08:49:00 $6,020.00 $946.00 $6,966.00 Main Office 2026-0040949 04/22/2026 10:23 04/22/2026 10:23:00 $2,912.00 $457.60 $3,369.60 Main Office 2026-0041403 04/23/2026 08:38 04/23/2026 08:38:00 $4,060.00 $638.00 $4,698.00 Main Office 2026-0041569 04/23/2026 10:36 04/23/2026 10:36:00 $3,080.00 $484.00 $3,564.00 Main Office 2026-0041580 04/23/2026 11:04 04/23/2026 11:04:00 $12,812.50 $1,127.50 $13,940.00 Main Office 2026-0041594 04/23/2026 11:18 04/23/2026 11:18:00 $15,000.00 $1,320.00 $16,320.00 Main Office 2026-0041620 04/23/2026 11:29 04/23/2026 11:29:00 $6,370.00 $1,001.00 $7,371.00 Main Office 2026-0041748 04/23/2026 13:30 04/23/2026 13:30:00 $3,612.00 $567.60 $4,179.60 Main Office 2026-0041993 04/24/2026 09:12 04/24/2026 09:12:00 $23,625.00 $2,079.00 $25,704.00 Main Office 2026-0041996 04/24/2026 09:12 04/24/2026 09:12:00 $5,635.00 $885.50 $6,520.50 Main Office 2026-0042127 04/24/2026 10:50 04/24/2026 10:50:00 $3,955.00 $621.50 $4,576.50 Main Office 2026-0042336 04/24/2026 14:25 04/24/2026 14:25:00 $2,905.00 $456.50 $3,361.50 Main Office 2026-0042342 04/24/2026 14:29 04/24/2026 14:29:00 $4,550.00 $715.00 $5,265.00 Main Office Documentary Transfer Tax for April 2026 (Attachment 4) Page 1727
5 of 6
KRISTIN B. CONNELLY, CLERK-RECORDER
County of Contra Costa
555 Escobar Street * Martinez, CA 94553
Phone (925) 335-7900 * Fax (925) 335-7926
Transfer Tax Monthly Detail by City
Report Date & Time
05/07/2026 13:02
For Month: April 2026
Document No. Recording Date/Time Transaction Date/Time Action City Split County Split Transfer Tax Total Location
2026-0042729 04/27/2026 11:28 04/27/2026 11:28:00 $3,675.00 $577.50 $4,252.50 Main Office 2026-0042800 04/27/2026 12:51 04/27/2026 12:51:00 $3,290.00 $517.00 $3,807.00 Main Office 2026-0042899 04/27/2026 13:46 04/27/2026 13:46:00 $3,780.00 $594.00 $4,374.00 Main Office 2026-0043040 04/27/2026 15:35 04/27/2026 15:35:00 $2,100.00 $330.00 $2,430.00 Main Office 2026-0043567 04/28/2026 14:54 04/28/2026 14:54:00 $1,820.00 $286.00 $2,106.00 Main Office 2026-0043573 04/28/2026 15:00 04/28/2026 15:00:00 $3,500.00 $550.00 $4,050.00 Main Office 2026-0043602 04/28/2026 15:26 04/28/2026 15:26:00 $2,310.00 $363.00 $2,673.00 Main Office 2026-0044955 04/30/2026 15:46 04/30/2026 15:46:00 $5,250.00 $825.00 $6,075.00 Main Office Total For Richmond $513,926.00 $65,343.30 $579,269.30
Documentary Transfer Tax for April 2026 (Attachment 4) Page 1728
6 of 6
OPEB and Pension Returns for April 2026 (Attachment 5)
Account Frequency Beg. Balance Contributions Interest Gain(Loss) Fees End Balance Rate PARS-OPEB Monthly 63,118,217.57 769,106.15 (2,782,271.44) (16,492.48) 61,088,559.80 -4.38% FY 2018 6.60%
FY 2019 6.77%
FY 2020 3.62%
FY 2021 26.76%
FY 2022 -13.72%
FY 2023 9.49%
FY 2024 13.37%
FY 2025 10.49%
FY 2026* 6.01%
*FY 2026 Annualized Return is based on 9 months of activity.

Annualized Returns
City of Richmond
City of Richmond Finance Department
PARS-OPEB Summary 450 Civic Center Plaza
Period Ending March 31, 2026 Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 620-6740

0.31%

2.81%

3.17%

0.68%

1.90%

2.25%

1.36%

0.45% 0.29%

1.73% 1.74%
-4.38%
-2.13%

0.21%

6.40%

6.79%

5.85%

4.90%

5.61%

4.11%

2.11%

2.48%

3.80%
-1.03%
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%
Apr-25
FY2025
May-25
FY2025
Jun-25
FY2025
Jul-25
FY2026
Aug-25
FY2026
Sep-25
FY2026
Oct-25
FY2026
Nov-25
FY2026
Dec-25
FY2026
Jan-26
FY2026
Feb-26
FY2026
Mar-26
FY2026
PARS-OPEB Return Rates
1-Month Return
3-Month Return

Page 1 of 3 ends

OPEB and Pension Returns for April 2026 (Attachment 5)
Account Frequency Beg. Balance Contributions Interest Gain(Loss) Fees End Balance Rate PARS-Pension Monthly 5,992,968.55 821,368.00 (292,164.72) (1,564.84) 6,520,606.99 -4.60% FY 2025 7.68%
FY 2026* 7.04%
*FY 2026 Annualized Return is based on 9 months of activity.

Annualized Returns
City of Richmond
City of Richmond Finance Department
PARS-Pension Summary 450 Civic Center Plaza
Period Ending March 31, 2026 Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 620-6740

0.31%

1.13%

2.40%

0.17%

2.48% 2.65%

1.42%

0.51% 0.36%

2.34%

1.70%
-4.60%

0.16% 0.29%

3.88%

3.73%

5.12%

5.37%

6.69%

4.64%

2.30%

3.23%

4.45%
-0.71%
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

Page 2 of 3 ends

OPEB and Pension Returns for April 2026 (Attachment 5)
Account Frequency Beg. Balance Disbursements Contributions Interest Gain(Loss) Fees End Balance Rate CalPERS-CERBT Quarterly 14,540,005.38 0.00 182,679.29 53,381.31 (2,583.84) 14,773,482.14 0.37% FY 2020 5.97%
FY 2021 20.47%
FY 2022 -12.60%
FY 2023 3.81%
FY 2024 8.69%
FY 2025 10.74%
FY 2026* 6.71%
*FY 2026 Annualized Return is based on 3 quarters of activity.

Annualized Returns
City of Richmond
City of Richmond Finance Department
CalPERS-CERBT Summary 450 Civic Center Plaza
Quarter Ending March 31, 2026 Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 620-6740

1.58%
-4.39%

10.60%

2.31%

0.47%

7.83%
-3.94%

1.37%

5.48%

4.82%

1.43%

0.37%
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%
Apr-Jun 2023
FY2023
Jul-Sep 2023
FY2024
Oct-Dec 2023
FY2024
Jan-Mar 2024
FY2024
Apr-Jun 2024
FY2024
Jul-Sep 2024
FY2025
Oct-Dec 2024
FY2025
Jan-Mar 2025
FY2025
Apr-Jun 2025
FY2025
Jul-Sep 2025
FY2026
Oct-Dec 2025
FY2026
Jan-Mar 2026
FY2026
CalPERS-CERBT Return Rates
3-Month Return

Page 3 of 3 ends

Page 1 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
Finance Department
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Emily Combs, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
Subject: Contract with SCI Consulting Group for Ballot Measure Feasibility, Strategic Communications, and Public
Opinion, and Public Outreach
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed $247,000 expenditure is included within the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Finance
Department budget.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

February 17, 2026

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City is evaluating long-term revenue options to
address structural fiscal challenges and community
priorities. On February 17, 2026, the City Council
approved an on-call contract with SCI Consulting Group
to support revenue enhancement analysis and other
priority City initiatives. Building on that preliminary analytical work, the City now requires dedicated
feasibility, voter research, and strategic communications services to assess whether a potential revenue measure
is viable. Due to the highly compressed timeline leading up to the August 7, 2026, deadline for placing measures on the November ballot, it is necessary to authorize both Phase 1 feasibility activities and Phase 2 informational and ballot-readiness services under a single contract to ensure continuity and timely completion.

AGENDA
REPORT
1732

Page 2 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE a sole-source contract with SCI Consulting Group to provide ballot-measure feasibility analysis,
strategic communications services, public-opinion
research, and public information outreach for the period of April 28, 2026, through June 30, 2027, in an amount
not to exceed $247,000 for Phase 1, with Phase 2
services – Finance Department (Emily Combs/Mubeen
Qader 510-412-2077).

DISCUSSION:

On February 17, 2026, the City Council approved an on-call contract with SCI Consulting Group to provide financial and technical advisory services in support of various City priorities, including revenue enhancement analysis.

Under this on-call engagement, the consultant began foundational analytical work that supports the City’s broader exploration of long-term fiscal sustainability and potential revenue solutions.

As part of this ongoing effort, the City is now evaluating the feasibility of placing a local revenue measure before voters in a future election. This evaluation requires specialized expertise in voter research, political diagnostics, and strategic communications to understand Richmond residents’ priorities and determine whether a potential measure is viable. While the on-call contract provided flexibility for preliminary analysis, a dedicated and structured scope of work is necessary to conduct statistically valid voter research and prepare the City for time-sensitive ballot requirements.

SCI Consulting Group, together with CliffordMoss and EVITARUS, submitted a comprehensive proposal for Phase 1 feasibility work and Phase 2 public information and ballot-readiness services. The team brings specialized experience in Proposition 218 revenue measures, California voter research, bilingual polling, political landscape assessments, strategic communications, and ballot-measure development for jurisdictions across California. City staff recommend a sole-source contract with SCI Consulting Group because this integrated approach is critical to maintaining continuity between feasibility analysis and measure preparation within the City’s compressed November 2026 ballot timeline.

Phase 1 includes:
 statistically valid public opinion research
 political environment and voter trend analysis
 early messaging concepts and preliminary ballot framework elements The proposal allocates $97,000 for Phase 1 services. This work will provide the City with objective, data-driven findings regarding community priorities, voter sentiment, and the feasibility of a potential November 2026 ballot measure. 1733

Page 3 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
Phase 2 includes:
 preparation of ballot-ready materials in coordination with the City Attorney and City Clerk
 legally compliant informational outreach and strategic communications stakeholder engagement
 packaging of a potential measure for City Council consideration The proposal allocates $150,500 for Phase 2 services. This work would allow the City to move directly from feasibility analysis into measure development, ballot preparation, and informational outreach if Phase 1 findings indicate that a measure is viable.

Due to the statutory deadline of August 7, 2026, for placing measures on the November 2026 ballot, the project timeline is highly compressed. If feasibility results indicate that a measure is viable, the City must be able to move seamlessly into Phase 2. Any delay in contract authorization could risk missing the filing deadline. For this reason, City staff recommend authorizing both Phase 1 and Phase 2 services at this time.

Together, the Phase 1 and Phase 2 scopes result in a total contract amount of $247,000, covering all feasibility, voter research, informational outreach, and ballot-readiness services through June 30, 2027. While Phase 2 work would only begin if feasibility results support proceeding toward a ballot measure, authorizing both phases within one contract ensures the City has the necessary resources and scheduling flexibility to meet statutory timelines and maintain continuity of work.

NEXT STEPS:

Upon City Council approval, City staff will execute the agreement with SCI Consulting Group for the combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 scope of work. City staff and the consultant team will continue Phase 1 feasibility activities, including political diagnostics and administration of the baseline voter survey. Following completion of the feasibility assessment, and if results indicate that proceeding is appropriate, City staff will initiate Phase 2 informational and ballot-readiness services to align with the August 7, 2026, deadline for submitting ballot materials. City staff will coordinate with the City Attorney and City Clerk to ensure all required filings are completed on schedule.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Original Contract
Attachment 2 – Sole Source
1734

CITY OF RICHMOND

STANDARD CONTRACT
Department: City Project Manager:

City Project Manager E-mail: City Project Manager Phone No:

Vendor No: Contract No:

Description of Services:

The parties to this STANDARD CONTRACT do mutually agree and promise as follows:

1. Parties. The parties to this Contract are the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation (“the City”), and the following named Contractor:

Contractor Name:

Street Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Contact Person:

Telephone: Email:

Business License No:
܆ A California corporation, ܆ limited liability corporation ܆ general partnership, ܆ limited partnership, ܆ individual, ܆ non-profit corporation, ܆ individual dba as [specify:] ____________________ ܆ other [specify:] _______________________________

2. Term. The effective date of this Contract is _______________________ and terminates _________________ unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

3. Payment Limit. City’s total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $______________ (“Contract Payment Limit”) unless a Contract Amendment has been approved by the City Council or City Manager. If this amount includes a contingency, Contractor acknowledges that any use of such contingency shall be for work beyond the original scope of services and requires prior written authorization by the City. If noted below, Compensation for work done under this Contract, shall not exceed as follows:

FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________

4. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor agrees to perform all work at its own cost and expense, to furnish all labor, tools, equipment, materials, except as otherwise specified, in accordance with the Service Plan set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

5. City Obligations. City shall make payments to the Contractor in accordance with the Payment Provisions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Finance Emily Combs
[email protected] (510) 620-6790
12967
Ballot Measure Feasibility, Strategic Communications, and Public Opinion Research Services.

SCI Consulting Group
4745 Mangels Blvd.

Fairfield, CA 94534
John Bliss
(707) 430-4300 [email protected]
40056534
April 28, 2026
June 30, 2027
247,500.00
1735

6. Authorized Representatives and Notices. This Contract is subject to the Authorized Representatives and Notices Provisions (Exhibit C), attached hereto and incorporated herein.

7. General Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions (Exhibit D), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

8. Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the Special Conditions (Exhibit E) (if any), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

9. Insurance Provisions. This Contract is subject to the Insurance Provisions (Exhibit F), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

10. Sanctuary City Compliance Statement. This Contract is subject to the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement (Exhibit G), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.

11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto:

CITY OF RICHMOND,
a municipal corporation [BUSINESS NAME]
(* The Corporation Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice President should sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Title: ________________________ Title: __________________________ Date Signed: _________________ Date Signed: ___________________ I hereby certify that this Contract (* The Corporation Chief Financial Officer or Assistant has been approved by City Council Treasurer, or Secretary or Assistant Secretary should or the City Manager. sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ City Clerk Title: __________________________
Date Signed: ____________________
Approved as to form:
(NOTE: Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section By: _________________________ 313, if Contractor is a corporation or nonprofit organization, City Attorney this Contract (1) must be signed by (a) the Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice-President and (b) the
Chief Financial Officer or Assistant Treasurer, or
Secretary or Assistant Secretary)
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:

Service Plan Exhibit A
Payment Provisions Exhibit B
Authorized Representatives and Notices Exhibit C
General Conditions Exhibit D
Special Conditions Exhibit E
Insurance Provisions Exhibit F
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement Exhibit G
SCI Consulting Group
1736
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT A

SERVICE PLAN
Contractor shall, to the satisfaction of the Project Manager (set forth in Exhibit B), perform the following services and be compensated as outlined below [or attach service plan if necessary]:

SCI Consulting Group
(see attached)
1737
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT PROVISIONS

1. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR:
a. Provided Contractor is not in default under this Contract, Contractor shall be compensated in the manner set forth herein.
b. All payments made pursuant to this Contract shall be subject to the Contract Payment Limit. The Payment Limit includes expenses (phones, photocopying, meals and travel, etc.). Invoices shall be adequately detailed, based on accurate records, and be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City. Contractor may be required to provide back-up material upon request. c. All City vendors receiving new contracts shall sign up to receive electronic payments through the City’s Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) payments service/provider.

2. SUBMISSION OF INVOICES:

Contractor shall submit timely invoices by email to
[email protected] and/or to the following address:

Attention: City of Richmond Finance/Account Payable
Project Manager: _______________________
P.O. Box 4046
Richmond, CA 94804

3. All invoices that are submitted by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of the City Project Manager, _______________________, before payments shall be authorized.
a. The City will pay invoice(s) within 45 days after completion of services to the City’s satisfaction. The City shall not pay late fees or interest.
b. All appropriate permits, certificates, and licenses, including a City business license shall be obtained and maintained for the duration of this Contract before any payment is authorized.

4. All insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be provided by the Contractor before this Contract is executed by the City. The insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be maintained by Contractor for the duration of this Contract and must be in place before any payment is authorized.

SCI Consulting Group
Emily Combs
Emily Combs
1738
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT C

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES

1. All required written notices shall be delivered: (i) by hand; or (ii) sent by registered, express, or certified mail, with return receipt requested or with delivery confirmation requested from the U.S. postal service; or (iii) sent by overnight or same day courier service at the party’s respective address listed in this Section.

2. Each notice shall be deemed to have been received on the earlier to occur of:
actual delivery or the date on which delivery is refused; or three (3) days after notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or with a courier service in the manner described above (Sundays and City holidays excepted).

3. Either party may, at any time, change its notice address (other than to a post office box address) by giving the other party three (3) days prior written notice of the new address.

4. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Contractor to the City shall be addressed to the City at:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Email: ________________________________________________

5. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from the City to Contractor shall be addressed to Contractor at:
$WWQ

Email: ________________________________________________ SCI Consulting Group
Emily Combs
[email protected]
SCI Consulting Group
4745 Mangels Blvd.

Fairfield, CA 94534
[email protected]
1739
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT D

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. INDEPENDENT PARTIES:

Contractor hereby declares that Contractor is engaged as an independent business and Contractor agrees to perform the services as an independent contractor.

The manner and means of conducting the services and tasks are under the control of Contractor except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Contract. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Contractor’s services. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including but not limited to unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation plans, vacation and sick leave, are available from the City to Contractor, its employees or agents. Deductions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any compensation due to Contractor. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Contractor.

2. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE:

Contractor and the City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Contract.

3. STANDARD OF CARE:

Contractor agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals or service Contractors, as applicable, in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City.

4. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IRCA):

Contractor assumes all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of its employees performing work hereunder, pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Contractor.

5. NON-DISCRIMINATION:

Consistent with the City’s policy and state and federal law that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable conduct, Contractor and its employees, contractors, and agents shall not harass or discriminate against any job applicant, City employee, or any other person on the basis of any kind of any statutorily (federal, state or local) protected class, including but not limited to: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, SCI Consulting Group
1740
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
disability (both mental and physical) including HIV and AIDS, medical condition (e.g. cancer), genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, pregnancy, political affiliation, military and veteran status or legitimate union activities. Contractor agrees that any violation of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

6. CITY PROPERTY:
a. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record, applicable plans, drawings, calculation, data, specification, video, graphic, or any other material or document produced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor pursuant to or in connection with this Contract shall be the exclusive property of the City. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Contractor shall not be obligated to provide to City proprietary software or data which Contractor has developed or had developed for Contractor's own use; provided, however, that Contractor shall, pursuant to Section 11 below, indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any discovery or Public Records Act request seeking the disclosure of such proprietary software or data. c. No report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Contractor pursuant to this Contract shall be made available to any individual or organization by Contractor without prior approval of the City Manager or their designee. d. Contractor shall, at such time and in such form as City Manager or their designee may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services and tasks required under this Contract.

7. RECORDS:
a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the services, tasks, work, documents and data in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract, as well as maintain books and records related to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City that relate to the performance of the services and tasks under this Contract (collectively the “Records”).
b. All Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the Records to the representatives of the City or its designees during regular business hours upon reasonable prior notice. The City has the right to examine and audit the Records, and to make copies or transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all proceedings and activities related to this Contract. Such Records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained by Contractor for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final payment.

SCI Consulting Group
1741
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. If supplemental examination or audit of the Records is necessary due to concerns raised by the City’s preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City’s supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of this Contract or failure to act in good faith, then Contractor shall reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit.

8. PERMITS AND LICENSES:

Contractor, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Contract, all appropriate permits, certificates and licenses, including a City business license, required in connection with the performance of the services and tasks hereunder.

The failure to obtain such permits and licenses shall be a material breach of this Contract and grounds for immediate termination by City; provided, however, that City may waive the business license requirement in writing under unusual or extraordinary circumstances without necessitating any modification of this Contract to reflect such waiver.

9. TERMINATION:
a. Termination Without Default. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, terminate this Contract at any time prior to completion by Contractor of the project or services hereunder immediately upon transmission of written notice to Contractor as provided in Exhibit C “Authorized Representatives and Notices”.
b. Termination in the Event of Default. Should Contractor fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, within the time and in the manner provided or otherwise violate any of the terms of this Contract, City may immediately terminate this Contract by giving written notice of such termination, stating the reasons for such termination. Contractor shall be compensated as provided in Exhibit B; provided, however, there shall be deducted from such amount the amount of damage, including attorney's fees, expert witness fees and costs, if any, sustained by City by virtue of Contractor's breach of this Contract. Additionally, in the event of such termination, the City may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses.

10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

Contractor acknowledges, represents and warrants that Contractor shall avoid all conflicts of interest (as defined under any federal, state or local statute, rule or regulation, or at common law) with respect to this Contract. Contractor further acknowledges, represents and warrants that no City official or employee has any economic interest, as defined in Title 2, California Code of Regulations §§ 18703.1 through 18703.5, with Contractor that would invalidate this Contract. Contractor acknowledges that in the event that Contractor shall be found by any judicial or administrative body to have any conflict of interest (as defined above) with respect to this Contract, all consideration received under SCI Consulting Group
1742
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
this Contract shall be forfeited and returned to City forthwith. This provision shall survive the termination of this Contract for one (1) year.

11. HOLD HARMLESS:
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City) and hold harmless the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) from and against any and all loss, damages, liability, obligations, claims, suits, judgments, costs and expenses whatsoever, including attorney’s fees and costs of litigation (“Claims”), arising from or in any manner connected to Contractor’s performance of its obligations under this Contract or failure to comply with any of its obligations under this Contract or out of the operations conducted by Contractor even if the City is found to have been negligent. If the Claims filed against Indemnitees allege negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct on the part of Contractor, Contractor shall have no right of reimbursement against Indemnitees for the costs of defense even if negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct is not found on the part of Contractor. Contractor shall not have any obligations to indemnify Indemnitees if the loss or damage is found to have resulted solely from the negligence or the willful misconduct of the City. The defense and indemnification obligations of this Contract are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Contract. b. This indemnification obligation shall survive this Contract and shall not be limited by any term of any insurance policy required under this Contract; provided however, that if this Contract is for design professional services, this indemnity provision is limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional (as defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8).

12. LIMITATIONS UPON SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENT:
a. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract, nor any portion hereof or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the City Council or its designee.
b. Contractor shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Contract, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of the City Manager. Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to transfer to the City Manager at least thirty (30) days in advance of the desired transfer.

The City Manager or their designee may consent or reject such request in their sole and absolute discretion. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for SCI Consulting Group
1743
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
money against the City under this Contract may be assigned by Contractor to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. c. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor (if applicable), or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member if Contractor is a partnership or jointventure or syndicate, which shall result in a change of control of Contractor, shall be deemed an assignment. For this purpose, control shall mean fifty percent or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.
d. Only those persons and/or businesses whose names and resumés are attached to this Contract shall be used in the performance of this Contract. However, if after the start of this Contract, Contractor wishes to use sub-contractors, at no additional costs to the City, then Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to add subcontractors including the names of the sub-contractors and the reasons for the request to the City Manager at least five (5) days in advance. The City Manager may consent or reject such requests in their sole and absolute discretion. e. Each sub-contractor shall be required to furnish proof of workers’ compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general, automobile and professional liability insurance (as applicable) in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Contractor.
f. In addition, any tasks or services performed by sub-contractors shall be subject to each provision of this Contract. Contractor shall include the following language in their Contract with any sub-contractor: “Sub-Contractors hired by Contractor agree to be bound to Contractor and the City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to the City.”
g. The requirements in this Section 12 shall not apply to persons who are merely providing materials, supplies, data or information that Contractor then analyzes and incorporates into its work product.

13. SAFETY:
a. Contractor acknowledges that the City is committed to the highest standards of workplace safety. Contractor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of all vehicles owned or operated by Contractor, including the safety of all persons and property during performance of the services and tasks under this Contract.

Contractor shall assume sole and complete responsibility for the safety of Contractor's employees and any of subcontractor's employees This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. In addition, Contractor will comply with all safety provisions in conformance with U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Act, any equivalent state law, and all other applicable SCI Consulting Group
1744
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
federal, state, county and local laws, ordinances, codes, and any regulations that may be detailed in other parts of the Contract. Where any of these are in conflict, the more stringent requirements will be followed. Contractor’s failure to thoroughly familiarize itself with the aforementioned safety provisions will not relieve it from compliance with the obligations and penalties set forth herein.
b. Contractor will immediately notify the City (in no event less than 24 hours) of any incident of death, serious personal injury or substantial property damage that occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract. Contractor will promptly submit to the City a written report of all incidents that occur in connection with this Contract. This report must include the following information: (i) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); (ii) name and address of Contractor’s employee(s) involved in the incident; (iii) name and address of Contractor’s liability insurance carrier; (iv) a detailed description of the incident; and (v) a police report.
c. Contractor acknowledges that the City shall have the right to impose, at the City’s sole discretion, requirements that it deems are necessary to protect the health and safety of the City employees, residents, and visitors. Contractor agrees to comply with all such requirements, including, but not limited to, mandatory vaccinations, the use of personal protective equipment (e.g. masks), physical distancing, and health screenings.

Contractor also agrees to make available to the City, at the City’s request, records to demonstrate Contractor’s compliance with this Section.

14. INSURANCE:

Insurance requirements are set forth in Exhibit F to this Contract. Contractor shall abide by the insurance requirements set forth in said Exhibit F.

15. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS:
a. During the term of this Contract, Contractor shall keep fully informed of all existing and future state and federal laws and all municipal ordinances and regulations of the City of Richmond which affect the manner in which the services or tasks are to be performed by Contractor, as well as all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same. Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, state and federal and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by the City. Compliance under this provision includes compliance with all provisions of the Richmond Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"), including Chapters 2.50,

2.52, 2.56, and 2.60, if applicable.
b. Contractor acknowledges that under § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code ("Living Wage Ordinance"), Contractor is required to provide the City with documents and information verifying its compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance. Contractor shall notify each of its affected employees with regards to the wages that are required to be paid pursuant to the Living Wage Ordinance as prescribed in § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code.

SCI Consulting Group
1745
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. Contractor shall comply with § 2.28.030 of the Municipal Code, obligating every Contractor or sub-Contractor under an agreement or sub-agreement with the City for public works, goods or services to refrain from discriminatory employment or practices on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religious creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential sub-contractor. d. Contractor acknowledges that the City’s Drug Free Workplace Policy, Violence in the Workplace Policy and the Policy Against Workplace Harassment, are available on the City’s website at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/workplacepolicies.

Contractor agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of said policies.

16. INTEGRATED CONTRACT:

The Recitals and exhibits are a material part of this Contract and are expressly incorporated herein. This Contract represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Contract will be effective only by written execution signed by both the City and Contractor.

17. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS:

In the event of a conflict between these General Conditions and those of any Exhibit or attachment hereto, these General Conditions shall prevail; provided, however, that any Special Condition as set forth in Exhibit E shall prevail over these General Conditions. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more Exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by the Contractor, and the terms and conditions preferred by the City shall prevail over those preferred by the Contractor.

18. FORCE MAJEURE:

Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of such an obligation is prevented or delayed by reason of acts of God, strikes, boycotts, lock-outs, inability to procure materials not related to the price thereof, failure of power, restrictive governmental laws and regulations enacted after the date of this Contract, riots, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, insurrection, war, declaration of a state or national emergency or other reasons of a like nature not within the reasonable control of such party.

19. CONFLICT OF LAW:

This Contract shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of SCI Consulting Group
1746
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
California without regard to any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Contract and obligations of the parties are subject to all valid laws, orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Contract (or the successors of those authorities). Any suits brought pursuant to this Contract shall be filed with the courts of the County of Contra Costa, State of California.

20. CLAIMS:

Any claim by Contractor against City hereunder shall be subject to Government Code §§ 800 et seq. The claims presentation provisions of said Act are hereby modified such that the presentation of all claims hereunder to the City shall be waived if not made within six months after accrual of the cause of action.

21. INTERPRETATION:

This Contract shall be interpreted as if drafted by both parties.

22. WARRANTY:

If any product is be provided to the City as part of this Contract, Contractor warrants as follows: Contractor possesses good title to the product and the right to transfer the product to City; the product shall be delivered to the City free from any security interest or other lien; the product meets any specifications contained herein; the product shall be free from material defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery; and the product shall be fit for its intended purpose(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, consumable and maintenance items (such as light bulbs and batteries) shall be warranted for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of delivery. All repairs during the warranty period shall be promptly performed by Contractor, at Contractor's expense, including shipping.

23. SEVERABILITY:

In the event that any of the provisions or portions or applications thereof of this Contract are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, City and Contractor shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of the Contract with a view toward effecting the purpose of this Contract, and the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions or portions or applications thereof, shall not be affected thereby.

24. AUTHORITY:

City warrants and represents that the signatory hereto (the Mayor of the City of Richmond or the City Manager) is duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of City. The party signing on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that they are duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor, SCI Consulting Group
1747
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
and shall be personally liable to City if they are not duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor.

25. WAIVER:

The waiver by City of any breach of any term or provision of this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach. Inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the City relating to the Contractor’s performance, or payment therefore, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor’s obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the City be thereby stopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Contract.

26. COUNTERPARTS:

This Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by fax, PDF, DocuSign, or other electronic means), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

27. SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE (SCCO):

The Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18 prohibits the City from granting and or retaining contracts with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement, attached hereto as Exhibit G.

SCI Consulting Group
1748
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT E

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The General Conditions are hereby amended to include the following modifications and/or provisions (if applicable, otherwise please state “NONE”):

SCI Consulting Group
None
1749
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT F

INSURANCE PROVISIONS
܆ CHECK HERE IF RISK MANAGEMENT HAS APPROVED WAIVING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS CONTRACT.

1. CERTIFICATES: Before the commencement of the terms of this Contract, and during the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, Contractor shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with coverage requirements set forth by the City and incorporated herein.

Such certificates, which do not limit Contractor’s indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement:
“Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days’ advance written notice to the City of Richmond.

Attention: Risk Manager.”
Contractor shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Contract all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Contract with an insurance company licensed to offer insurance business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII or Standard & Poor’s Rating (if rated) of at least BBB unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Contractor shall deliver updated insurance certificates to the City at the address set forth in Exhibit C prior to the expiration of the existing insurance certificate for the duration of the term of Contract.

Endorsements naming the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates.

2. COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: The City’s insurance requirements depend upon the type of service being provided and/or the provider. The City’s insurance requirements will fall into one of the following categories (unless otherwise provided by the City):

Consultants and Contractors – Type 1
Professional Services – Type 2
Environmental Risk/Hazardous Waste Material – Type 3
Lease of City Property – Type 4
Vendors, Suppliers, Small Grant Recipients & Nonprofit Organizations – Type 5 Transportation Providers – Type 6
Professional Services Pyrotechnics – Type 7
Cyber and I.T. Risks – Type 8
SCI Consulting Group
1750
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
The insurance requirements classification applicable to this Contract shall be attached to this Exhibit F and made a part hereof.
ϯ͘ FAILURE TO SECURE: If Contractor at any time during the term hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, the City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in Contractor’s name or as an agent of Contractor and shall be compensated by Contractor for the costs of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed from the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid.
ϰ͘ SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by the City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Contractor. Contractor is advised to consult Contractor’s insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Contractor. The coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Contract; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of the coverage carried by or available to Contractor; whichever is greater.

INSERT INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CLASSIFICATION APPLICABLE TO THIS CONTRACT: (IF NECESSARY, CONFIRM WITH RISK MANAGER)
SCI Consulting Group
1751
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT G

SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”).

Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

SCI Consulting Group
1752
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 1 of 4
Revised: September 2011
In all instances where a CONTRACTOR or its representatives will be conducting business and/or providing services, the City requires the following MINIMUM insurance requirements and limits.

CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, agreement, or other order for work, services or supplies, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.

CONTRACTOR agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, CONTRACTOR shall look solely to its insurance for recovery. CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either CONTRACTOR or CITY with respect to the services of CONSULTANT herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Original, signed certificates and original, separate policy endorsements, naming the City as an additional insured for general liability, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received and approved by the City before any work may begin. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.

City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of CONTRACTORS work.

Minimum coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy.

The minimum limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of CONTRACTOR.

Minimum Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001) including coverage for bodily and personal injury, property damage, and products and completed operations.

2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto)

3. Original and Separate Additional Insured Endorsements for General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.

4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability coverage.

5. Original and Separate Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation and Builder’s Risk/ Course of Construction Insurance.

6. Builder’s Risk/Course of Construction insurance covering all risks of loss less policy exclusions when the City of Richmond has a financial interest in the property. – (Only required for Construction Contracts involving property)

7. Contractor’s Pollution Liability (if applicable for Construction Contractors) Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation and
Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease.

If CONTRACTOR is self-insured, provide a certificate of Permission to SelfInsure, signed by the California Department of Industrial Relations and SelfInsurance. If contractor is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than contractor must sign “Contractor Release of Liability” found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.
1753
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 2 of 4
Revised: September 2011

PROJECT COST REQUIRED LIMIT
$0 - $5 million $2 million p/o
$5 million - $10 million $5 million p/o
Over $10 million $10 million p/o
Fireworks $5 million p/o
General Liability
(primary and excess limits
combined)
Includes coverage for bodily injury, personal injury, property damage and products and completed operations. The policy shall not exclude coverage for XCU perils (explosion, collapse, or damage to underground property).

If the policy includes a general aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, service or location or the minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate limit).

Policy shall be endorsed to name the City of Richmond as an additional insured per the conditions detailed below.

Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

Builders’ Risk/Course of
Construction – Covers property
under construction, repair or
renovation as well as equipment
and materials to be installed.
(Only required for Construction
Projects involving property and
equipment installation.)
Coverage shall include all risks of direct physical loss, excluding earthquake, for an amount equal to the full completed value of the covered structure or replacement value of alterations or additions, including soft costs and business interruption.

If the project does not involve new or major reconstruction, an Installation Floater may be acceptable. For such projects, a property installation floater shall be obtained that provides for the improvement, remodel, modification, alteration, conversion or adjustment to existing buildings, structures, processes, machinery and equipment. The Property Installation Floater shall provide property damage coverage for any building, structure, machinery or equipment damaged, impaired, broken or destroyed during the performance of the Work, including during transit, installation and testing at the City of Richmond’s site.

The City of Richmond shall be named as loss payee as its interest may appear. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against City.

Contractor’s Pollution Liability (if
applicable)
Protects against:
unexpected/unintended release of
pollution resulting from contractors
covered operations such as:

HVAC, paving, carpentry, pipeline
& tank installation, drillers,
remediation contractors,
maintenance, mechanical,
demolition, excavation, grading,
street/road construction,
residential & commercial builders.

Same limits as General Liability.

Required Policy Conditions
A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, CONTRACTOR must replace coverage immediately and provide notice to City.

Additional Insured Endorsement Applicable to General Liability Coverage.

The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, including but not limited to bodily injury, deaths and property damage or destruction arising in any respect directly or indirectly in the performance of this contract.

ISO form CG 20 10 (11/85) or its equivalent is required. The endorsement must not exclude products and completed operations coverage. If it does, then CG 20 37 (10/01) is also required. 1754
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 3 of 4
Revised: September 2011
Additional Insured Endorsement
(continued)
SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61
Primary and Noncontributory The contractor’s insurance coverage must be primary coverage as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City is wholly separate from the insurance of the contractor and in no way relieves the contractor from its responsibility to provide insurance.

Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
Contractor’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers Compensation and Builder’s Risk/ Course of Construction coverage during the life of this contract.

SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61
Deductibles and Self-Insured
Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a financial guarantee in an amount equal to the deductible or self-insured retention guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

Contractor is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.

Loss Payable Endorsement (only
required when Builder’s Risk
and/or Course of Construction
Insurance is required.)
Applicable to Builder’s Risk/Course of Construction naming the City of Richmond as Loss Payee.

SURETY BONDS
(If a Public Works/Engineering
Project)
The Contractor shall provide:

1. A Bid bond

2. A Performance Bond

3. A Payment Bond
Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverages and cover those insured in the underlying policies.

Claims-Made Policies
If any insurance policy is written on a claims-made form: 1) the retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3) If coverage is canceled or nonrenewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

Subcontractors
CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by CONTRACTOR, and/or CONTRACTOR’s subcontractors, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of CONTRACTOR, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from CONTRACTOR or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.
1755
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements – Type 1:

Consultants and Contractors
Type 1 – Page 4 of 4
Revised: September 2011
Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work may begin. The City of Richmond reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies including endorsements affecting the coverage at any time.

Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed, or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.

Insurance certificates and endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manager. However, Contractor must mail the original certificates and endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.

Continuous Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the contract. Should the CONTRACTOR cease to have insurance as required during this time, all work by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with the City’s insurance requirements, the City may take such action as it deems necessary to protect the City’s interests. Such action may include but is not limited to termination of the contract, withholding of payments, or other actions as the City deems appropriate.

If services or the scope of work extend beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, CONTRACTOR must provide updated certificates and endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place. Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.

Cancellation
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that coverage shall not be cancelled, reduced or otherwise materially changed except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable.
1756
Friday, June 5, 2026
Submitted via Email
[email protected]
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond 94804
Re: Strategic Communications Services regarding Ballot Measure Feasibility Dear Mubeen:

Thank you for our discussion last week and for the opportunity to submit this proposal to support your efforts to explore the feasibility of a future ballot measure for the City of Richmond. Our team of CliffordMoss, EVITARUS, and SCI Consulting Group looks forward to partnering with you! The following is a short proposal outlining our capabilities and general approach.

Our team brings together three complementary firms with a shared commitment to helping communities succeed at the ballot. SCI Consulting Group, California's leader in Proposition 218- compliant funding measures, has guided over 300 successful fees, taxes, and assessments for public agencies statewide. CliffordMoss is a seasoned strategic communications and ballot measure consulting firm with a strong record of wins across the Bay Area and Contra Costa County, including Sales Tax Measure A for Oakland, Measure N for San Ramon, and Measure O for Walnut Creek. EVITARUS brings more than 20 years of public opinion research expertise, helping cities and counties across California secure voter support for revenue enhancements. Together, we know how to craft strategy, build community support, and deliver results when it matters most.

No two communities are alike, and we don't treat them that way. We listen closely and design our approach to reflect the unique needs, priorities, and political landscape of each client and community we serve.

Our passion is helping strengthen our communities—one project at a time. We are eager to bring our experience and energy to the City of Richmond.

Sincerely,
John Bliss, President
SCI Consulting Group
1757
About CliffordMoss
Firm Information: Our key company information is as follows:

CliffordMoss, LLC Primary Contact:
5111 Telegraph Avenue, No. 307 Tom Clifford, Principal, Oakland, CA 94609 Cell: 510-847-7155
Firm Structure: LLC – Limited Liability Company Email: [email protected] 510- 907-3195 / [email protected]
Founded in 2012 (14 Years in Business)
At CliffordMoss, our passion is building better communities by providing expertise and guidance in stakeholder engagement, political navigation, and strategic communications. We are committed to collaborative, creative, and customized client service. And because everyone has a unique story to tell, we've dedicated our firm to helping clients tell their stories in a way that attracts lasting support.

We have worked successfully alongside local public agencies and elected officials throughout the Bay Area, including in Contra Costa County.

Our team is driven by three core principles:

YOUR community is unique ◆ Listening is a lost art ◆ People support what they help create We use these principles to help you tell your unique story in an honest and compelling way. We use them to help you engage, listen, and build relationships - one conversation at a time. Most importantly, we use them to help you see opportunities through a win-win lens, so you inspire others to rise and champion your cause from the outside in. This is how we help you win in a genuine way, reflecting your unique story.

About EVITARUS
EVITARUS is a full-service, public opinion research firm that delivers actionable data and strategic advice to public agencies, ballot measure campaigns, community-based organizations, foundations, advocacy coalitions, news organizations, universities, businesses, and other policy stakeholders.

For more than 20 years, our researchers have been conducting public opinion research on behalf of cities, counties, special districts, and other public, philanthropic, and corporate clients to inform public policy and strategic decision-making. This includes assisting scores of cities and counties throughout California in securing voter support for revenue enhancements.

Our mission is to illuminate, elevate, and amplify the voices of everyday people so that they have a voice in the decisions that impact their quality of life.

Our services include:
• Multi-lingual online surveys, random-digit-dial (RDD) and listed sample telephone surveys, text, and mail and intercept surveys, with specific expertise in conducting research among California voters;
1758
• Multi-lingual focus group and IDI research, online and in-person; • Languages supported: English, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Farsi, Armenian, Khmer, Russian, and other languages. • Statistical analysis;
• Community participatory research; and
• Strategic consulting.

Our working style is fast-paced, highly responsive, collaborative, and consultative. We will bring the full range of our knowledge, expertise, and experience to bear on the research to be conducted.

About SCI Consulting Group
Established in 1985, SCI Consulting Group is a recognized public finance and urban economic consulting firm serving public, nonprofit, and private-sector organizations. We leverage our extensive experience to provide sound technical and practical advice supported by principled research and analysis. SCI Consulting Group provides comprehensive services in a manner that limits the time and resources of our clients.

SCI Consulting Group assists public agencies with implementing revenue measures to secure comprehensive funding for operations and maintenance, services, and capital improvements. We work primarily in the areas of flood control, parks and recreation, landscape and lighting, mosquito and vector control, cannabis, homelessness and housing, schools, and fire protection. SCI also provides support for both balloted and non-balloted revenue approaches to storm drainage and water quality.

As California's leader in local Proposition 218-compliant funding measures, SCI guides clients through the entire balloting process, including funding options and feasibility planning, community polling, Engineer's/Fee/Rate studies, community outreach, ballot design, printing, and mailing, tabulation, and beyond. Our unmatched record of winning ballot measures for essential local government services gives you confidence as we assist you through this process from start to finish.

2. Our Team
Our team is well-suited to help you achieve your electoral goals. Together, we have decades of experience in all aspects of helping communities prepare for and pass local ballot measures. Here is more about us:

Tom Clifford, CliffordMoss Founding Principal. Tom is a seasoned political and election strategist with significant experience engaging and leading complex, diverse, must-win projects in the public arena. Tom graduated from UC Berkeley, worked in the State Capitol and served as a CORO fellow before completing a joint degree in law at UC Berkeley and public policy at Princeton University. He later practiced public law and litigation at Bingham McCutchen in San Francisco for six years before moving into political consulting with a leading California firm and forming CliffordMoss in 2012 with partner Bonnie Moss. Tom enjoys tackling thorny political issues that tap his political strategy and legal expertise. He has guided winning campaigns across California, including many in the Bay Area and in Contra Costa County. Tom lived in Latin America for several years, speaks Spanish and Marathi (in addition to English) and has extensive experience guiding 1759
projects with multi-cultural and multi-lingual components. Tom grew up in Chico and now lives in Oakland with his wife and three children.

CliffordMoss SUPPORT TEAM. CliffordMoss employs a boutique team of professionals with expertise in community organizing, communications, online and social media expertise, media relations savvy, multi-lingual experience, and extensive print/production/direct mail capabilities.

John Bliss, President. John continues to lead SCI Consulting Group as California's premier firm for public agency revenue mechanism implementation and administration. John has led the development and implementation of over 300 Proposition 218-compliant fees, taxes, and assessments – more than all other engineers in California, combined. John has a passion for the local community and for effective, progressive public policy, which motivates his work at SCI and is demonstrated through his service with a variety of volunteer organizations in Oakland. John graduated from Brown University with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, and holds a Master's Degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, where he was a Regent's Scholar. He is a licensed professional Civil Engineer in the State of California.

Rodrego Byerly is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer. He has more than 25 years of public policy, research management, strategy, and investment banking experience. Mr. Byerly has executed research spanning a range of issues, including safety, housing, economic development, legacy planning, digital assets, mental health, sports and play, youth community engagement and mentorship, youth activity centers, senior services, civic engagement, and transportation. Mr. Byerly is a member of AAPOR. Mr. Byerly earned a Master's degree in Public Administration at Columbia University, and a Bachelor's degree in Economics and Government at Dartmouth College.

Dr. Shakari Byerly is Managing Partner and the Director of Polling & Research. A political scientist and public policy researcher, Dr. Byerly has more than 25 years of experience, having conducted extensive polling and research across the country. Dr. Byerly is a skilled and experienced focus group moderator and survey research methodologist. Dr. Byerly designs and conducts public opinion research encompassing a broad range of issues, including local ballot measures, marketing and public outreach, public infrastructure and services, community safety, mental health, healthcare, housing, development, parks and recreation, youth and senior wellness, education, play and sports, open space, research to inform behavioral change (social marketing), nutritious food, transportation, and natural resource conservation. Before joining EVITARUS, she served as a Senior Vice President at FM3 Research. Dr. Byerly is a prominent member of American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), which is the worldwide professional organization of public opinion and survey research professionals, including members from academia, media, government, nonprofits, and private industry. She holds positions on AAPOR's Strategic Planning Committee and Executive Leadership Nominating Committee. Dr. Byerly is a National Academies of Sciences Ford Foundation Fellow. Her scholarly work has appeared in the Journal of Urban Affairs and the Journal of the Center for Policy Analysis and Research. Dr. Byerly has also served as a Reviewer for Public Opinion Quarterly. Dr. Byerly earned a Ph.D. and a Master's degree in Political Science at UCLA, a Master's degree in Public Policy at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, and a Bachelor's degree in Government at Dartmouth College.
1760

3. References

City of Oakland | Government| Alameda Co.

Bradley Johnson, Director of Finance, 510-238-2220
2014 10 yr. Parcel Tax and Parking Tax WIN (77% YES)
2020 $148 20 yr. Parcel Tax for Parks WIN (68.08% YES)
2022 $850M Facilities Bond | Tax Rate: $71 per $100,000 | WIN (75.33% YES) 2024 $198 9yr. Parcel Tax WIN (70% YES)
City of San Ramon – Contra Costa Co.

Steven Spedowfski, City Manager, 925-973-2632 / cell: 925-733-9772 Scott Knoll, Assistant City Manager, 925-973-2651 / cell: 916-838-4227 2024 1-cent Sales Tax WIN (56% YES)
*Provided public engagement/information-only services only City of Walnut Creek – Contra Costa Co.

Dan Buckshi, City Manager, 805-305-5372
Betsy Burkhart, Communications and Outreach Manager, 925-404-4994 2022 0.5% Sales Tax | WIN (65.05% YES)
*Provided public engagement/information-only services only City of San Leandro – Alameda Co.

Eric Engelbart, Deputy City Manager, 510-577-3391 / cell: 805-637-5263 2020 Property Transfer Tax increase to $11 per $1,000 Property Tax WIN (53.28% YES) 2024 Feasibility Work on a Potential Revenue Measure – City chose NOT to go to the ballot in the end. *Provided public engagement services/information-only services only Additional references available upon request.

4. Project Approach
As we begin our work, FIRST, we will make the time to listen to you. At CliffordMoss, we believe LISTENING is a lost art. Many firms will come in and tell you exactly what you should do without getting to know who you are and what makes your city unique. We won't do that. We will sit with you – and others you think we can learn from, including your city manager and city staff leadership team, mayor and councilmembers, and other key communicators until we understand you, your needs, and the conditions that you believe will drive success in today's election environment. 1761
We will proceed along deliberate tracks using proven tools to navigate the way forward and this project may include two phases:

PHASE 1: Feasibility, Strategic Electoral Planning, Financial Analysis and Early Listening PHASE 2: Public Education and Ballot Measure Preparation (TBD – Depending on the Results of Phase 1)
Here, in greater detail, is what you can expect from our team as we help you prepare for success:

Phase 1: Feasibility
Public Opinion Polling Support. We understand you have already had some discussions with EVITARUS. Great! We work well with EVITARUS and support the feasibility research process.

Political Analysis. One of CliffordMoss' most important responsibilities in the Phase 1 process is to analyze and anticipate with you the political terrain ahead to help you navigate the future successfully. No two communities are the same. We will work with you to conduct a series of political diagnostic exercises to improve our collective understanding of your political playfield and dynamics.

Listening Strategy. We deliberately make time to listen and learn from those most likely to influence the outcome of your measures. By employing our proven diagnostic tools, including opinion leader interviews and stakeholder meetings (whether in-person, via zoom technology, or conference call), we are better able to understand your stakeholders, and, most importantly, get an early understanding of your voters (the ultimate decision makers in the exercise ahead). We will also look at more recent political or electoral events, including high-visibility Contra Costa County and/or statewide revenue measures.

Our early Phase 1 Feasibility work together provides the CLARITY needed to navigate the way forward. As we move through early listening, including polling and other strategic communications work, we will always refer back to the revealing data, letting the evidence tell us where to go next. This is why we resist making judgments on what will or won't work until we have concluded all aspects of early feasibility work.

Baseline Survey Research
We propose to conduct a multi-modal (telephone and online) baseline survey of up to 500 City of Richmond voters in English and Spanish ("Baseline Survey"). The Baseline Survey would enable the city to assess voter sentiment toward the potential ballot measure (the "Potential Ballot Measure" or "PBM").
x A Baseline Survey of this size is associated with a margin of sampling error (MOE) of ±4.38% at the 95% confidence level and would provide for statistically reliable estimates of public opinion among key demographic and geographic subgroups reflecting the communities of the city.
x This would enable segmentation of results by supervisorial district, age, gender, race/ethnicity, and psychographics such as perceptions of City's performance in key areas, tax sensitivity, and funding priorities.

SWOT ANALYSIS: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats

STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

1762
We envision that the Baseline Survey would cover a range of topics to be determined by City Staff.

Some potential topics from which City Staff could select might include:
x The overall direction of the city and economic climate; x Attitudes toward the City's job performance across key areas; x Overall levels of support and opposition to a PBM based on the proposed PBM title and summary;
x Funding priorities;
x The correlation between how voters view key issues facing the City and how those sentiments might inform funding priority preferences and willingness to support a tax increase; x Reactions to information about the benefits of the PBM, including the City's rationale for advancing the PBM, as well as concerns that might underlie opposition or hesitancy to support; and
x How additional information about the benefits and potential drawbacks may impact levels of support and opposition.

Baseline Survey Research Parameters
The Baseline Survey will include the following parameters:
x Mixed-Mode: Live-telephone interviewing and online surveying x Languages: English and Spanish; and
x Length: The Baseline Survey will take the average respondent up to twenty (20) minutes to complete.

The Survey Research Process includes:
x Participating in project meeting(s) to assess key objectives and issues to be explored; x Designing the survey sampling plan and obtaining the Survey Sample; x Developing the Survey questionnaire (the "Survey Questionnaire") and translating the Survey Questionnaire (the "Translated Survey Questionnaire"); x Programming the Survey for administration;
x Administering the Survey to the full list of potential respondents; x Data processing; and
x Analyzing, reporting, and presenting the Survey results.

Upon conclusion of the Survey Research, Client will receive the following deliverables (the "Survey Research Deliverables" ):
x Participation in project planning meeting(s);
x The Final Survey Questionnaire and the Translated Survey Questionnaire; x Topline survey results (the survey questionnaire completed with the response code selection percentages) (the "Survey Results");
x Cross–tabulated results (responses to every question in the Survey, broken down by demographic, geographic, and attitudinal subgroups of the population); x A summary presentation or memorandum of Survey Results; and x Presentation of Key Findings to stakeholders as determined by Client. 1763
There are 3 possible outcomes of the Feasibility Phase:
◆ BEST: PROCEED TO BALLOT. Feasibility is present. Continue to get "election ready." ◆ PROCEED WITH CAUTION. Some but not all signs of feasibility are present. In this case, we may move forward; however, we may face some tough decisions to stay in alignment with what we know your City of Richmond voters will support.
◆ STOP – REGROUP. If significant risks emerge out of the Feasibility process, we will tell you so – even if it means telling you that your vision to go to the ballot is overly ambitious and more time is needed to prepare your community for electoral success.

If feasibility is determined and the evidence shows the ballot measures are winnable, our process continues…
PHASE 2: Public Education and Ballot Measure Preparation In Phase 2, our goal will be to get you "election-ready." Expect the following:

1. STRATEGIC CONSENSUS AS WE BEGIN PHASE 2 – i.e., internal team agreement about where we stand, what package and schedule we're aligning with, and which election we're targeting. There is a particular science to the work we do. Armed with results and data from Phase 1, the CliffordMoss team helps you plan for a Phase 2 effort that helps you build the public awareness and interest you'll need for the future.

2. EFFECTIVE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, MESSAGING & INFORMATIONAL OUTREACH.

We employ messaging strategies to engage voters and stakeholders in compelling, memorable ways. We help you take the time to listen and learn from those most likely to influence the outcome of your election. PROVEN STRATEGIES we use (especially with voters!) to engage, listen, educate, and build awareness include:
"Outbound" Public Information & Communications Support. We will review your existing communications operation at the city with a strategic lens to identify opportunities for improving educational impact; rapid-response capabilities/results; reaching additional audiences; engaging grassroots organizations and leaders to participate in the discussion through micro-networks; and customizing communications tools to facilitate more participation in the conversation, especially at the ground-community level.

CliffordMoss has many proven tools in our communications "tool kit", including strategies to hold down costs while communicating effectively in a robust public outreach plan:
x Opinion leader and stakeholder work.
x public meetings (virtual if necessary).
x city-sponsored informational outreach.
x Direct mail.
x Traditional media.
x Web / online / social media.
x Messaging around key specific stakeholders.
x messaging around key specific stakeholders.
1764

3. WORK WITH YOU TO EFFECTIVELY PACKAGE YOUR MEASURE. We will work with you to complete the following ballot measure preparation essentials:
x Collaborate with you, your city attorney, and other consultants on final ballot package components.
x Finalize core messaging (we know the words and format that work with best with voters!) x Prepare your ballot language, including the all-important 75-word Ballot Question x Provide input to/support your city attorney and/or city clerk, and the County Registrars of Voters (ROV) to ensure that your ballot measure package filed is the right package for electoral success.
x Provide guidance on media efforts to help position the city effectively. x Provide ongoing strategic counsel to help you navigate the political terrain.

PHASE 3: CAMPAIGN WINDOW
TIMELINE:88-DAY CAMPAIGN WINDOW
During the 88-day election window, state law requires a complete separation between the agency (in this case the City) and an advocacy campaign established for the purpose of passing a local revenue measure. Please note, with increasing frequency, our team is working more and more with cities on "information-only". However, there are cases where we offer full-service campaign capabilities later to an independent campaign committee, and in that case, we sever our relationship with the city and pivot to providing for an independent campaign client:
x Campaign strategy – including campaign plan, targeting, and messaging creating the blueprint for guiding your campaign to victory – informed by your research results and public engagement process.
x Campaign organizational development capabilities (Every community is unique!) x Tools and systems for fundraising and budget planning and management. x A full spectrum of mail/print and digital services – e.g., concept development, copywriting, design, and full production/delivery coordination.
x Community coalition building and endorsement strategies/systems. x Scripts and messaging for phone-banking and other voter contact efforts. x Grassroots field strategies for intensive voter mobilization services. x Volunteer recruitment, training, management, and recognition services. x Voter data tracking systems and capabilities, including Get Out the Vote services. x Media relations, including crisis management, if needed.

5. Our Commitment to You
Our team will work with you to make prudent, smart decisions that position you effectively. YOU will always be in the driver's seat about all budget-related decisions. Our management plan focuses on YOU and YOUR needs.

People Support What They Help Create. We believe in building a community conversation infrastructure where the solution (i.e., ballot measure, etc.) is built in by the community alongside City of Richmond leadership and expertise.
1765
Effective use of TIME to meaningfully communicate with various stakeholders is valuable in enabling you to both calibrate your communications and create streamlined methods of sharing information to use resources wisely.

6. Cost Proposal
Our fee structure is designed to allow us to bring the very best strategic guidance to you to achieve YOUR strategic and electoral objectives. Our clients tell us the investment in in our team is well worth it, given our record of doing the job once, doing it right, and getting it done.

CliffordMoss Strategic, EVITARUS, and SCI Consulting Group Phase 1 Flat Fee: $97,000 This fee proposal includes all costs for overall project management, baseline survey, strategy work, and core team meeting participation and/or facilitation.

CliffordMoss Strategic, EVITARUS, and SCI Consulting Group Phase 2 Flat Fee: $150,500 This Phase 2 fee and program proposal includes two direct mailers, a digital education outreach program, direct texting, a tracking poll and additional consulting services (including ballot measure preparation) as you inform and educate your community about a potential measure and shape the measure for a final vote on a ballot resolution from your City Council in late July, 2026.

7. Thank You
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for the City of Richmond. We are eager to work with you. Our experience across the state on hundreds of ballot measures, as well as our knowledge navigating political success in Bay Area and communities close to yours in Contra Costa County has prepared us well to serve you in the important work ahead.

On behalf of our entire team, we appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and we hope you share our enthusiasm for letting us tell your story.
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Finance Department
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Emily Combs, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Deputy Director of Finance
Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
Subject: Special Assessments for Unpaid Garbage Collection Service Fees
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City will receive $472,383.10 when the outstanding liens are paid, of which $447,408.10 will be remitted to Republic Services and $24,975.00 in administrative fees will be retained by the City (Account String: 01917090- 341502).

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff requests City Council approval of liens and
special assessments for unpaid garbage collection
service fees to be placed on the County property tax
records.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution and AUTHORIZE placement of liens and special assessments for unpaid garbage collection
service fees on Contra Costa County’s property tax
records – Finance Department (Emily Combs/Mubeen
Qader 510-620-6740/Antonio Banuelos 510-620-6741).

AGENDA
REPORT
1771

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
DISCUSSION:

Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 9.20 entitled “Solid Wastes” requires property owners to have garbage collection services and pay for those services. Richmond property owners are notified in writing of their obligation to pay for garbage collection services. Property owners who are five (5) months delinquent in their payments receive a final notification of their outstanding debt and a date for an administrative hearing (Attachment 1).

Administrative hearings are held quarterly and attended by staff from both Republic Services and the City of Richmond’s Finance Department. If the fees remain unpaid, a lien is placed on the property in the amount of the unpaid garbage collection fees plus associated City administrative fees (Attachment 2).

City staff is requesting that the City Council adopt a resolution that authorizes liens and special assessments for unpaid garbage collection services fees to be placed on Contra Costa County’s property tax records (Attachment 3). Garbage collection fees recovered through the property tax process are remitted to Republic Services annually after property tax collection of the property taxes, while administrative fees are retained by the City.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Letter from Republic Services
Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Attachment 3 – (Exhibit A) Garbage Lien Resolution
1772
�'\\ �R..,,_ REPUBLIC.

SERVICES
Sustainability in Action
June 3, 2026
Ms. Emily Combs, Director of Finance
City of Richmond
P. 0. Box 4046
Richmond, CA 94804
via email: [email protected]
Att: Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
Dear Antonio:

Subject: GARBAGE LIENS Preliminary June 3, 2026 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING Enclosed is the preliminary lien list that includes unpaid waste collection service charges that fell delinquent. As you will note, this list includes 555 records, representing $447,408.10 in delinquent service charges and $24,975.00 in City Administrative Fees, for a total of $472,383.10 to be assigned to the City for lien and special assessment upon the property taxes of benefiting properties. All required notices have beenprovided to account holders and property owners.

Please let me know when this item is scheduled for City Council consideration. After Council approval, we will provide you with an updated list for recording. After recording, please provide us with a copy of the enabling resolution and coversheet bearing the document recording information.

The next Administrative Hearing to consider liens for delinquent waste collection service charges is scheduled for October 7, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., in the Richmond Room at City Hall.

If you have any questions, or need additional information, please let me know. I can be reached by telephone at (510) 262-7131, or e-mail at [email protected] Angela Roof
Customer Service Manager
cc: City Clerk
3260 Blume Dr, Suite 115, Richmond, CA 94806 I RichmondSanitaryServlce.com I Organics, Recycling & Waste 1773
Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5170500044 ZHANG JIAN XING 177 POPE ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 541 42ND ST 26/01 $ 430.85 $ 45.00 $ 475.85 202606 HR 5240700145 AUSTIN SHELBY RUTH 901 33RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 901 33RD ST 26/01 $ 950.76 $ 45.00 $ 995.76 202606 HR 5502110157 TUGBENYOH MAWUKO TRE 167 S 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 167 S 6TH ST 26/01 $ 1,578.26 $ 45.00 $ 1,623.26 202606 HR 5292620258 ABRAM DIANA LYNNE TRE 1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 26/01 $ 174.32 $ 45.00 $ 219.32 202606 HR 4056300074 STAIDSON BIOPHARMA INC 2600 HILLTOP DR BLDG A102 SAN PABLO CA 94806 829 MEADOW VIEW DR 26/01 $ 416.82 $ 45.00 $ 461.82 202606 HR 5280300095 CHANDRA PRANESHWAR 2722 HUMPHREY AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2722 HUMPHREY AVE 26/01 $ 363.11 $ 45.00 $ 408.11 202606 HR 5600250137 SMITH STEVE 5100 CHANNEL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5100 CHANNEL AVE 25/09 $ 2,400.01 $ 45.00 $ 2,445.01 202606 HR 5443210074 TORRES SERGIO 643 S 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 643 S 20TH ST 26/01 $ 389.44 $ 45.00 $ 434.44 202606 HR 4055800132 ROBLEH KOWSER MOHAMMAD 326 HAWK RIDGE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 326 HAWK RIDGE DR 25/10 $ 218.26 $ 45.00 $ 263.26 202606 HR 5140900084 SITU HUI XIAN 50 BEVERLY ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94132 2225 MACDONALD AVE 26/01 $ 33.54 $ 45.00 $ 78.54 202606 HR 5404800715 SANCHEZ MICHAEL J JR 1523 NEVIN PLZ RICHMOND CA 94801 1523 NEVIN PLZ 26/01 $ 548.32 $ 45.00 $ 593.32 202606 HR 4142810078 SINGH HARPREET 2981 BIRMINGHAM DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2981 BIRMINGHAM DR 26/01 $ 491.94 $ 45.00 $ 536.94 202606 HR 5404800293 JOHNSON CHRISTOPHER 346 VILLAGE LN RICHMOND CA 94801 346 VILLAGE LN 26/01 $ 430.85 $ 45.00 $ 475.85 202606 HR 5611810259 ESCOBAR MORENA 417 GERTRUDE AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 417 GERTRUDE AVE 26/01 $ 479.28 $ 45.00 $ 524.28 202606 HR 5380600063 TIJERINO MARITZA 1763 OAKDALE AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94124 330 BARRETT AVE 26/01 $ 183.88 $ 45.00 $ 228.88 202606 HR 5402700222 XIE YAOBIN 118 12TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 118 12TH ST 26/01 $ 442.76 $ 45.00 $ 487.76 202606 HR 4141610289 TABARES ERNESTO OCHOA 2927 23RD AVE OAKLAND CA 94606 2645 MOYERS RD 26/01 $ 434.33 $ 45.00 $ 479.33 202606 HR 5130250078 MOORE BARBARA 2811 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2811 FLORIDA AVE 26/01 $ 574.85 $ 45.00 $ 619.85 202606 HR 5582620109 SEARLS DAVID N 4376 CAHILL ST FREMONT CA 94538 209 MARINE ST 26/01 $ 150.49 $ 45.00 $ 195.49 202606 HR 4141040164 BARKSDALE ELLASTINE 2842 MOYERS RD RICHMOND CA 94806 2842 MOYERS RD 26/01 $ 500.47 $ 45.00 $ 545.47 202606 HR 4261910501 LAGMAY JOSIE UMIL & MELVIEN R 220 PARK LN RICHMOND CA 94803 220 PARK LN 26/01 $ 387.77 $ 45.00 $ 432.77 202606 HR 5490310264 WILLIAM LARRY JR 329 S 24TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 329 S 24TH ST 26/01 $ 336.72 $ 45.00 $ 381.72 202606 HR 4142610262 ZARAGOZA DARRIN J 2901 CANTERBURY DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2901 CANTERBURY DR 26/01 $ 430.85 $ 45.00 $ 475.85 202606 HR 5240100239 ORTEGA JUAN MANUEL JR 950 WILSON AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 950 WILSON AVE 26/01 $ 1,170.51 $ 45.00 $ 1,215.51 202606 HR 4056300132 STAIDSON BIOPHARMA INC 2600 HILLTOP DR BLDG A-102 SAN PABLO CA 94806 817 MEADOW WEST CT 26/01 $ 430.85 $ 45.00 $ 475.85 202606 HR 5230940040 MAAT 961 SONOMA ST RICHMOND CA 94805 961 SONOMA ST 26/01 $ 229.64 $ 45.00 $ 274.64 202606 HR 5611920124 BACAB JORGE ANTONIO HOIL 500 DUBOCE AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 500 DUBOCE AVE 26/01 $ 430.85 $ 45.00 $ 475.85 202606 HR 4056600085 SHAW JOHN W 5354 NIBLICK CT SAN PABLO CA 94806 5354 NIBLICK CT 26/01 $ 194.85 $ 45.00 $ 239.85 202606 HR 5383600078 PAVLOVSKY ALEX 2643 APPIAN WAY STE C PINOLE CA 94564 14 2ND ST 26/01 $ 990.32 $ 45.00 $ 1,035.32 202606 HR 5440410123 ROCKETT GAYBRIEL 109 S 18TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 109 S 18TH ST 26/01 $ 332.98 $ 45.00 $ 377.98 202606 HR 5130450017 SOTO ALFREDO LANDAVERDE 130 S 33RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 130 S 33RD ST 26/01 $ 1,171.89 $ 45.00 $ 1,216.89 202606 HR 5190600014 ALLEN GWENDOLYN CECEILA 5400 CLINTON AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 5400 CLINTON AVE 25/07 $ 165.90 $ 45.00 $ 210.90 202606 HR 5262900219 ALGHARAZI FAIZ 2823 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2823 RHEEM AVE 26/01 $ 513.47 $ 45.00 $ 558.47 202606 HR 4053600575 DOMINGO JOSEPHINE D & EDGAR 2698 LONGVIEW DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2698 LONGVIEW DR 25/07 $ 38.63 $ 45.00 $ 83.63 202606 HR 5290400067 TREJO ALFREDO R 1750 LINCOLN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1750 LINCOLN AVE 26/01 $ 514.82 $ 45.00 $ 559.82 202606 HR 4053810711 SANCHEZ MARCELO 2440 HIGHGATE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2440 HIGHGATE DR 26/01 $ 249.91 $ 45.00 $ 294.91 202606 HR 5501420110 PADILLA MARCO TULIO URBINA 411 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 411 FLORIDA AVE 26/01 $ 271.95 $ 45.00 $ 316.95 202606 HR 5133960483 HARRIS MYRNA L 4901 POTRERO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4901 POTRERO AVE 26/01 $ 442.20 $ 45.00 $ 487.20 202606 HR 5130540031 BACA MAURICIO J DIAZ 3315 WALL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3315 WALL AVE 26/01 $ 345.61 $ 45.00 $ 390.61 202606 HR 5382000080 ROSILLO VICENTE JIMENEZ 1143 FLORIDA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94110 253 4TH ST 25/11 $ 220.21 $ 45.00 $ 265.21 202606 HR 5442720032 GREEN SANDY E SR & CARMEN P 42 SUN REIGN PL SACRAMENTO CA 95823 519 S 17TH ST 26/01 $ 441.11 $ 45.00 $ 486.11

Page 1 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5101020088 ALCANTARA JEZREEL 5716 FRESNO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5716 FRESNO AVE 26/01 $ 324.12 $ 45.00 $ 369.12 202606 HR 5561530147 GOMEZ-BARRIS LORENA 111 E RICHMOND AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 111 E RICHMOND AVE 25/10 $ 208.96 $ 45.00 $ 253.96 202606 HR 5608301767 HEYWOOD KEE 1590 WRIGHT AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 1590 WRIGHT AVE 25/10 $ 147.35 $ 45.00 $ 192.35 202606 HR 4141630063 MENDEZ MOISES ALARCON 2722 MOYERS RD RICHMOND CA 94806 2722 MOYERS RD 25/10 $ 60.16 $ 45.00 $ 105.16 202606 HR 5581220273 RICHARD LOMPA INC 3950 BISSELL AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 145 PARK PL 26/01 $ 4,106.14 $ 45.00 $ 4,151.14 202606 HR 5130510182 CONTRERAS MARCO ANTONIO 1445 SAN JOAQUIN ST RICHMOND CA 94804 3327 WALLER AVE 26/01 $ 428.82 $ 45.00 $ 473.82 202606 HR 5283200110 THOMPSON GEORGIA & TIMOTHY III 2714 DOWNER AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2714 DOWNER AVE 26/01 $ 452.69 $ 45.00 $ 497.69 202606 HR 5342120069 AVILA MILTON DANIEL 3914 LA COLINA RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 637 4TH ST 26/01 $ 131.17 $ 45.00 $ 176.17 202606 HR 5342010252 PAVLOVSKY ALEX 2643 APPIAN WAY STE C PINOLE CA 94564 626 5TH ST 26/01 $ 1,182.10 $ 45.00 $ 1,227.10 202606 HR 5130530123 MARTINEZ ROSIE 251 S 37TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 251 S 37TH ST 26/01 $ 430.85 $ 45.00 $ 475.85 202606 HR 4353100060 FUJITA MICHAEL EST OF 6507 CRENSHAW CT SAN JOSE CA 95120 5457 ALLISON LN 26/01 $ 294.12 $ 45.00 $ 339.12 202606 HR 5443120133 PICKETT VERNA L 2044 MOKELUMNE DR ANTIOCH CA 94531 660 S 22ND ST 26/01 $ 1,365.07 $ 45.00 $ 1,410.07 202606 HR 5502120081 LEE TOLEDA R 150 S 6TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 150 S 6TH ST 26/01 $ 494.88 $ 45.00 $ 539.88 202606 HR 5171800047 SIMON-HICKS CAROL DEAN 439 39TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 439 39TH ST 26/01 $ 755.75 $ 45.00 $ 800.75 202606 HR 4263520019 SHYNE PAMELA R 1252 PARKWAY DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1252 PARKWAY DR 26/01 $ 440.69 $ 45.00 $ 485.69 202606 HR 5404300252 COMMON AREA TRACT 5636 226 GRAND AVE #315 OAKLANDCA 94610 1532 CHANSLOR AVE 26/01 $ 6,490.24 $ 45.00 $ 6,535.24 202606 HR 5292000097 EDWARDS MARILYN J EST OF 3220 BLUME DR STE 197 RICHMOND CA 94806 1914 GARVIN AVE 26/01 $ 127.06 $ 45.00 $ 172.06 202606 HR 5404800467 METRO WALK WEST CORP 24050 SILVA AVE APT 70 HAYWARD CA 94544 442 MARINA WAY 26/01 $ 479.03 $ 45.00 $ 524.03 202606 HR 5303300171 HO MATTHEW SAY 2203 VISALIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2203 VISALIA AVE 26/01 $ 359.80 $ 45.00 $ 404.80 202606 HR 4056900923 SHARP SHERICE J 530 SUMMER LN RICHMOND CA 94806 530 SUMMER LN 26/01 $ 363.18 $ 45.00 $ 408.18 202606 HR 4321110100 STEPHENS RENE 152 W BLOSSOM WAY HAYWARD CA 94541 4968 BUCKBOARD WAY 25/10 $ 217.81 $ 45.00 $ 262.81 202606 HR 4141040040 MAHBOUBA MOHAMMED 19003 SUMMIT DR TOPANGA CA 90290 2827 JO ANN DR 25/10 $ 208.96 $ 45.00 $ 253.96 202606 HR 5501300189 PALMA JOSE A & MARIA L 135 S 3RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 135 S 3RD ST 26/04 $ 657.11 $ 45.00 $ 702.11 202606 HR 5100700029 STG 5327 JACUZZI LLC 1304 SOUTHPOINT BLVD STE 280 PETALUMA CA 94954 5327 JACUZZI ST 25/11 $ 98.33 $ 45.00 $ 143.33 202606 HR 4140220072 MILESTONE FINANCIAL LLC 4962 EL CAMINO REAL STE 201 LOS ALTOS CA 94022 2946 GOMER DR 26/04 $ 602.53 $ 45.00 $ 647.53 202606 HR 5270520124 HAUG MERRILL W 2501 BUSH AVE RICHMOND CA 94806 2501 BUSH AVE 26/04 $ 514.14 $ 45.00 $ 559.14 202606 HR 4321340061 BRIGGS-MARSHALL BETTY TRE 5442 CONESTOGA WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 5442 CONESTOGA WAY 26/04 $ 414.56 $ 45.00 $ 459.56 202606 HR 5442810049 LAW DAMIAN TRE 522 S 17TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 522 S 17TH ST 26/03 $ 410.54 $ 45.00 $ 455.54 202606 HR 5342220299 VANEGAS EVELIN Y 619 2ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 619 2ND ST 26/03 $ 410.54 $ 45.00 $ 455.54 202606 HR 5142300028 MARCADIER ALINE X 635 23RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 635 23RD ST 26/03 $ 1,169.38 $ 45.00 $ 1,214.38 202606 HR 4252610060 ASHFORD-MALONE ANN J TRE 3126 FIESTA CT RICHMOND CA 94803 3126 FIESTA CT 26/03 $ 688.96 $ 45.00 $ 733.96 202606 HR 5240100056 AGUILERA ALICIA M TRE 6132 PLYMOUTH AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 12867 SAN PABLO AVE 26/03 $ 565.79 $ 45.00 $ 610.79 202606 HR 5441410122 HART GAYLE L 355 S 15TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 355 S 15TH ST 26/01 $ 218.59 $ 45.00 $ 263.59 202606 HR 5140900183 RICHMOND NEVIN ASSOCIATES 3351 M ST STE 100 MERCED CA 95348 2200 NEVIN AVE 26/04 $ 12,622.16 $ 45.00 $ 12,667.16 202606 HR 5291500055 LIMON GUILLERMO 1726 GAYNOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1726 GAYNOR AVE 26/04 $ 669.43 $ 45.00 $ 714.43 202606 HR 5441610069 SELLERS-DUNBAR DORIAN M 310 S 17TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 310 S 17TH ST 26/04 $ 1,258.86 $ 45.00 $ 1,303.86 202606 HR 5281900216 MENJIVAR KARINA B 2711 GAYNOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2711 GAYNOR AVE 26/04 $ 334.99 $ 45.00 $ 379.99 202606 HR 5608300611 GREEN STEPHEN SHAWN 1404 MAST COVE WAY RICHMOND CA 94804 1404 MAST COVE WAY 26/01 $ 184.15 $ 45.00 $ 229.15 202606 HR 5182900067 KING BRENNAN C 633 36TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 633 36TH ST 26/04 $ 656.06 $ 45.00 $ 701.06 202606 HR 5403800237 MERCADO MAURILLO JR 2643 APPIAN WAY STE K PINOLE CA 94564 17 19TH ST 26/04 $ 1,907.34 $ 45.00 $ 1,952.34 202606 HR 5605310043 SCG MARINA BAY BUSINESS 1000 BROADWAY STE 200-H RICHMOND CA 94607 1100 MARINA WAY S SUITE D 26/01 $ 376.92 $ 45.00 $ 421.92 202606 HR 5081000027 GASKIN PAUL L 1302 SANTA CLARA ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1302 SANTA CLARA ST 26/03 $ 1,412.52 $ 45.00 $ 1,457.52 202606 HR 4142820283 WEBB FRANCIES 3085 BIRMINGHAM DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3085 BIRMINGHAM DR 26/04 $ 887.44 $ 45.00 $ 932.44 202606 HR 5440920188 ACOSTA MARLENE 270 S 18TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 270 S 18TH ST 26/04 $ 481.07 $ 45.00 $ 526.07 202606 HR 5180400052 CHOI WAI KIN PO BOX 1069 EL CERRITO CA 94530 12545 SAN PABLO AVE 26/04 $ 2,955.08 $ 45.00 $ 3,000.08 202606 HR 5402400252 TING CHAO WIN & KEH CHYN TRE 216 DANTLEY WAY WALNUT CREEK CA 94598 118 15TH ST 26/02 $ 1,364.15 $ 45.00 $ 1,409.15

Page 2 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5340810232 GONZALES ALEJANDRO A 729 7TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 729 7TH ST 26/03 $ 410.54 $ 45.00 $ 455.54 202606 HR 5130240079 J R BUSINESS INVESTMENTS LLC 5735 MCBRYDE AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 166 CARLSON BLVD 26/04 $ 2,830.66 $ 45.00 $ 2,875.66 202606 HR 4056800222 KARKI KESHIKA 5509 VISTA CT RICHMOND CA 94806 5509 VISTA CT 26/01 $ 208.56 $ 45.00 $ 253.56 202606 HR 5501910052 HENRIQUEZ YONI 300 S 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 300 S 5TH ST 26/05 $ 898.38 $ 45.00 $ 943.38 202606 HR 5210800149 SOPOCI JOSHUA C 1631 CYPRESS AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 1631 CYPRESS AVE 26/03 $ 427.38 $ 45.00 $ 472.38 202606 HR 5300700217 BARNES DEEANN CAROLE 1424 COSTA AVE RICHMOND CA 94806 1125 15TH ST 1424-26 COST AVE (4 26/03 $ 1,947.20 $ 45.00 $ 1,992.20 202606 HR 4080320478 SIMMS ALICE GERALDINE TRE 1606 BEECHWOOD DR MARTINEZ CA 94553 800 PAYNE DR 26/03 $ 395.27 $ 45.00 $ 440.27 202606 HR 5101030269 DESPOT DANA A TRE 5630 COLUMBIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5630 COLUMBIA AVE 26/03 $ 800.68 $ 45.00 $ 845.68 202606 HR 5182400043 PROULX THOMAS 645 31ST ST RICHMOND CA 94804 645 31ST ST 26/03 $ 427.38 $ 45.00 $ 472.38 202606 HR 4054700754 RUBINO CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH 2536 TREESIDE WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 2536 TREESIDE WAY 26/03 $ 344.87 $ 45.00 $ 389.87 202606 HR 5612030014 TUCKEY ROBERT S TRE 441 ALAMEDA AVE HALF MOON BAY CA 94019 1160 7TH ST 26/03 $ 570.19 $ 45.00 $ 615.19 202606 HR 4313810055 ROBINSON BENJAMIN 3641 BLACK FEATHER DR RICHMOND CA 94803 3641 BLACK FEATHER DR 26/03 $ 394.67 $ 45.00 $ 439.67 202606 HR 5153700157 SERRANO ALEJANDRO JR 8008 MICHIGAN AVE OAKLAND CA 94605 88 MURDOCK ST 26/05 $ 585.49 $ 45.00 $ 630.49 202606 HR 5441620167 ROACH JEDEDIAH 1817 VIRGINIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 1817 VIRGINIA AVE 25/12 $ 147.70 $ 45.00 $ 192.70 202606 HR 5342220075 FRANKLIN YVONNE D 635 2ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 635 2ND ST 26/04 $ 1,430.50 $ 45.00 $ 1,475.50 202606 HR 5442220207 EVANS IVORY 20885 REDWOOD RD CASTRO VALLEYCA 94546 453 S 17TH ST 26/04 $ 1,907.34 $ 45.00 $ 1,952.34 202606 HR 5271410036 QUEZADA HENRY S & LAURA P 2517 MARICOPA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2517 MARICOPA AVE 26/04 $ 434.50 $ 45.00 $ 479.50 202606 HR 5070800049 RITCHIE REBECCA 2008 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 2008 CARLSON BLVD 26/04 $ 603.37 $ 45.00 $ 648.37 202606 HR 5404100132 CLARK JOVANATHAN LEEARL 2113 OHIO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2113 OHIO AVE 26/04 $ 621.42 $ 45.00 $ 666.42 202606 HR 4055300067 KHANGURA HAKAM & RAJWANT TRE 132 CAFETO CT WALNUT CREEK CA 94598 3111 STONE CLIFF CT 26/03 $ 427.38 $ 45.00 $ 472.38 202606 HR 5081400110 VALEBOE CARL CHRISTIAN 1480 SAN JOAQUIN ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1480 SAN JOAQUIN ST 26/03 $ 296.89 $ 45.00 $ 341.89 202606 HR 5292720090 GALLEGOS MARIA P 717 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 717 20TH ST 26/03 $ 428.70 $ 45.00 $ 473.70 202606 HR 5134020238 JONES ORA B 4116 BERK AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4116 BERK AVE 26/03 $ 562.76 $ 45.00 $ 607.76 202606 HR 4056500186 LIANG WILLIAM W 21 CLEARFIELD DR SAN FRANCISCO CA 94132 1075 NEWCASTLE CT 26/04 $ 629.44 $ 45.00 $ 674.44 202606 HR 4140540131 MANZANARES JERRY J TRE PO BOX 21031 EL SOBRANTE CA 94820 3100 SHANE DR 26/03 $ 559.70 $ 45.00 $ 604.70 202606 HR 5082910026 BAKER PAUL 10787 SAN PABLO AVE EL CERRITOCA 94530 10787 SAN PABLO AVE 26/03 $ 545.08 $ 45.00 $ 590.08 202606 HR 5500610232 PEREZ MARIA ISABEL 233 BISSELL AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 100 OHIO AVE 26/04 $ 1,907.34 $ 45.00 $ 1,952.34 202606 HR 5440820206 ROBERTSON LINDA J TRE 2021 MAINE AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2021 MAINE AVE 26/04 $ 978.79 $ 45.00 $ 1,023.79 202606 HR 5162010028 FUJISE JEAN 326 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 326 35TH ST 26/04 $ 475.09 $ 45.00 $ 520.09 202606 HR 5142200186 ALHUZAIBI NOMAN 800 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 516 22ND ST 26/04 $ 1,451.88 $ 45.00 $ 1,496.88 202606 HR 5440910148 KEITH RUBY 215 S 18TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 215 S 18TH ST 26/03 $ 362.96 $ 45.00 $ 407.96 202606 HR 5404800772 JONES CHRISTOPHER ANDREW 1547 NEVIN PLZ RICHMOND CA 94801 1547 NEVIN PLZ 26/03 $ 367.30 $ 45.00 $ 412.30 202606 HR 5383500120 ZHANG YANTING 270 EL NIDO RD PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 126 CHANSLOR AVE 26/03 $ 450.04 $ 45.00 $ 495.04 202606 HR 5093200334 ALHUZAIBI NAJI N 814 S 45TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 814 S 45TH ST 26/03 $ 351.14 $ 45.00 $ 396.14 202606 HR 5133170364 CHAVIS DEANNA 861 RIO GRANDE DR VACAVILLE CA 95687 425 S 50TH ST 26/03 $ 1,240.01 $ 45.00 $ 1,285.01 202606 HR 5131640061 JACKSON GLORIA D TRE 3128 CENTER AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 311 S 35TH ST 311-15 26/04 $ 1,538.46 $ 45.00 $ 1,583.46 202606 HR 4140530074 GATSON LINDA J 2952 GILMA DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2952 GILMA DR 26/04 $ 802.81 $ 45.00 $ 847.81 202606 HR 5443310114 MERCADO MAGDA 2643 APPIAN WAY STE K PINOLE CA 94564 634 S 15TH ST 26/04 $ 1,907.34 $ 45.00 $ 1,952.34 202606 HR 5173300178 JEFFERSON MARITZA 1162 REGATTA PT HERCULESCA 94547 3721 BISSELL AVE 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 5190800085 COLLINS RONALD WAYNE 647 YUBA ST RICHMOND CA 94805 647 YUBA ST 26/04 $ 452.81 $ 45.00 $ 497.81 202606 HR 5600250137 SMITH STEVE 5100 CHANNEL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5100 CHANNEL AVE 26/04 $ 4,717.03 $ 45.00 $ 4,762.03 202606 HR 5502510067 GHEBREAMLAK IYOB 412 S 7TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 412 S 7TH ST 26/03 $ 410.54 $ 45.00 $ 455.54 202606 HR 4311000709 SCHELL CHRISTOPHER JOHN 4943 SANTA RITA RD RICHMOND CA 94803 4943 SANTA RITA RD 26/03 $ 470.95 $ 45.00 $ 515.95 202606 HR 5082220186 LING LIN WENDY MIAO 1826 33RD AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94122 5500 TEHAMA AVE 26/02 $ 1,350.36 $ 45.00 $ 1,395.36 202606 HR 5281310093 CAMPOS MARICRUZ GARCIA 2862 LINCOLN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2862 LINCOLN AVE 26/02 $ 638.50 $ 45.00 $ 683.50 202606 HR 5582410030 SENDEROWICZ KHOI NGUYEN TRE 36 FAIRLAWN DR BERKELEY CA 94708 714 GOLDEN GATE AVE 26/02 $ 1,032.78 $ 45.00 $ 1,077.78

Page 3 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 4321220073 BASCO DIGNA 5225 BUCKBOARD WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 5225 BUCKBOARD WAY 26/02 $ 439.61 $ 45.00 $ 484.61 202606 HR 5171700114 MUNOZ NORMA 420 39TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 420 39TH ST 26/04 $ 1,135.87 $ 45.00 $ 1,180.87 202606 HR 5403500290 ACOSTA ANTONIO & ROSE L 10 15TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 10 15TH ST 26/04 $ 1,785.97 $ 45.00 $ 1,830.97 202606 HR 4322030018 CASIMERE RONALD W & LADELLE A 5318 GLENWOOD WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 5318 GLENWOOD WAY 26/04 $ 465.49 $ 45.00 $ 510.49 202606 HR 5282800076 SCHATZ ELAINE K 2850 GARVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2850 GARVIN AVE 26/04 $ 319.87 $ 45.00 $ 364.87 202606 HR 4311830113 ONTIVEROS RANDOLPH J TRE 3121 SHELDON DR RICHMOND CA 94803 3121 SHELDON DR 26/04 $ 683.32 $ 45.00 $ 728.32 202606 HR 4056300181 CABALLERO PABLO & MARTHA 805 MEADOW VIEW DR RICHMOND CA 94806 805 MEADOW VIEW DR 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 5341930120 SKINNER VERONICA 1025 NEVIN AVE UNIT 2703 RICHMOND CA 94802 648 6TH ST 26/04 $ 1,455.24 $ 45.00 $ 1,500.24 202606 HR 4322030257 SUBEDI ASHESH 5570 COUNTRY VIEW DR RICHMOND CA 94803 5570 COUNTRY VIEW DR 26/04 $ 824.04 $ 45.00 $ 869.04 202606 HR 5500900112 KODIAK PRECISION INC 444 S 1ST ST RICHMONDCA 94804 444 S 1ST ST 26/03 $ 5,643.92 $ 45.00 $ 5,688.92 202606 HR 4335020196 BOONMANEE SOMKHIT 5737 SKYVIEW PL RICHMOND CA 94803 5737 SKYVIEW PL 26/04 $ 828.20 $ 45.00 $ 873.20 202606 HR 5130530040 GARNER ALBERT E 4829 PORTO PINO WAY ANTELOPE CA 95843 3500 WALLER AVE 26/04 $ 441.18 $ 45.00 $ 486.18 202606 HR 5180200148 BOYKINS CALVIN 3911 CLINTON AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 3911 CLINTON AVE 26/05 $ 666.14 $ 45.00 $ 711.14 202606 HR 4140320013 LANGFORD DERRICK L 2940 MULLENS DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2940 MULLENS DR 26/03 $ 434.84 $ 45.00 $ 479.84 202606 HR 5183100097 TEMPLE JENNIFER TRE 1095 ORCHARD AVE VALLEJO CA 94591 623 38TH ST 25/07 $ 117.04 $ 45.00 $ 162.04 202606 HR 5291100112 CASH SALLY A 1418 ESMOND AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1418 ESMOND AVE 26/03 $ 334.57 $ 45.00 $ 379.57 202606 HR 4141100067 JONES JACKEY LEE 2781 JO ANN DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2781 JO ANN DR 26/03 $ 379.38 $ 45.00 $ 424.38 202606 HR 5180500182 LOPEZ LUDMYRNA 674 WILSON AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 674 WILSON AVE 26/03 $ 427.38 $ 45.00 $ 472.38 202606 HR 4263530117 SOLEMNIDAD MARK & AVI 1218 GREENWAY DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1218 GREENWAY DR 25/12 $ 194.20 $ 45.00 $ 239.20 202606 HR 5442820170 SUTTON HONDO 3630 HIGH ST UNIT 18516 OAKLAND CA 94619 555 S 19TH ST 26/03 $ 414.79 $ 45.00 $ 459.79 202606 HR 5611920017 ZHANG YANTING 270 EL NIDO RD PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 316 DUBOCE AVE 26/04 $ 491.20 $ 45.00 $ 536.20 202606 HR 5093500105 THACH TAY TAM 3318 PINOLE VALLEY RD PINOLE CA 94564 1025 S 47TH ST 26/04 $ 7,243.52 $ 45.00 $ 7,288.52 202606 HR 5501510290 PAVLOVSKY NATALY 2934 HILLTOP MALL RD 126 SAN PABLO CA 94806 216 S 3RD ST 26/04 $ 1,964.76 $ 45.00 $ 2,009.76 202606 HR 5081920216 PATEL PANKAJKUMAR 12049 ASHWORTH ST ARTESIA CA 90701 1516 OSCAR ST 25/10 $ 320.75 $ 45.00 $ 365.75 202606 HR 5271900176 MORALES ALFREDO 2369 HUMPHREY AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2369 HUMPHREY AVE 26/02 $ 474.78 $ 45.00 $ 519.78 202606 HR 5131510306 RUIZ RUBEN D 415 S 38TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 415 S 38TH ST 26/02 $ 483.56 $ 45.00 $ 528.56 202606 HR 5130250102 THOMAS KSANDRA 169 S 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 169 29TH ST SOUTH 29TH 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5161400105 SASE CRAIG A & JANICE A TRE 3121 NEVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3121 NEVIN AVE 26/02 $ 1,226.87 $ 45.00 $ 1,271.87 202606 HR 5190500073 PRIMUS RUBY L 685 AMADOR ST RICHMOND CA 94805 685 AMADOR ST 26/02 $ 638.66 $ 45.00 $ 683.66 202606 HR 5132930073 BARRETT MARION D 4610 ESCUELA CT RICHMOND CA 94804 4610 ESCUELA CT 26/02 $ 601.45 $ 45.00 $ 646.45 202606 HR 5290500189 DELGADO RAFAEL 1829 ESMOND AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1829 ESMOND AVE 26/02 $ 614.05 $ 45.00 $ 659.05 202606 HR 5132940130 CORDOVA ODILIA CHAVARRIA 505 S 49TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 505 S 49TH ST 26/04 $ 413.69 $ 45.00 $ 458.69 202606 HR 5131610189 OWENS BERTH JR & EVELYN 2915 BIRMINGHAM DR RICHMONDCA 94806 3321 CUTTING BLVD 26/04 $ 3,384.18 $ 45.00 $ 3,429.18 202606 HR 5404800160 HOLLMAN NAILAH 469 METRO WALK WAY RICHMOND CA 94801 469 METRO WALK WAY 26/04 $ 653.72 $ 45.00 $ 698.72 202606 HR 5150200227 CARBAJAL GERARDO & MARTA TRE 16 ROBBINS PL ALAMO CA 94507 2323 ROOSEVELT AVE 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 5132920132 DIAS DEBORAH TRE 2357 BARRETT CT PINOLE CA 94564 4628 CUTTING CIR 26/01 $ 200.99 $ 45.00 $ 245.99 202606 HR 5342010062 SECTY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEV 647 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 647 6TH ST 26/04 $ 395.18 $ 45.00 $ 440.18 202606 HR 5490810073 BOZMAN WANDA J 423 S 28TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 423 S 28TH ST 26/04 $ 444.01 $ 45.00 $ 489.01 202606 HR 5303100134 QUINTANILLA IRIS B 1921 LINCOLN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1921 LINCOLN AVE 26/04 $ 441.71 $ 45.00 $ 486.71 202606 HR 5490200226 LIVING WATERS THAT I AM 284 S 23RD ST RICHMONDCA 94804 284 S 23RD ST 26/01 $ 495.14 $ 45.00 $ 540.14 202606 HR 5172710054 BANK OF AMERICA PO BOX 32547 CHARLOTTE NC 28232 4800 MACDONALD AVE 25/11 $ 731.99 $ 45.00 $ 776.99 202606 HR 5130100042 ADEL PARK LLC 1432 EDINGER AVE STE 120 RICHMOND CA 92780 350 CARLSON BLVD 26/04 $ 3,300.00 $ 45.00 $ 3,345.00 202606 HR 5271900184 SHIE STEVE FU TRE 251 LOON CT FOSTER CITY CA 94404 2367 HUMPHREY AVE 26/01 $ 200.99 $ 45.00 $ 245.99 202606 HR 4142310053 NEGRETE VERONICA 3017 COLETTE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3017 COLETTE DR 26/02 $ 624.13 $ 45.00 $ 669.13 202606 HR 4080340088 DOTSON MARY LEE EST OF 620 LAKEVILLE CIR PETALUMA CA 94954 4113 JENKINS WAY 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5403600124 HUDSON JULIA L PO BOX 1683 RICHMOND CA 94802 1637 OHIO AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45

Page 4 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5341920063 YOUNG RENEE FOWLER 735 RIPLEY AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 733 RIPLEY AVE 26/02 $ 1,226.86 $ 45.00 $ 1,271.86 202606 HR 5300800124 CHAVEZ JUAN LUIS P & SORAIDA E 1519 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1519 RHEEM AVE 26/02 $ 509.17 $ 45.00 $ 554.17 202606 HR 5182400266 WHITNEY CORINNA 634 30TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 634 30TH ST 26/02 $ 660.71 $ 45.00 $ 705.71 202606 HR 5242300167 HONDA GARY S & JANIS K 756 39TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 756 39TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4140710098 BOYD TERRENCE O 3141 JO ANN DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3141 JO ANN DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5093300191 FRIDIA EARNEST & FLORENCE TRE 1701 HOLIDAY DR NEW ORLEANS LA 70114 910 S 46TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5501200165 RUSSELL RALPH J 269 S 3RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 269 S 3RD ST 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 5501520208 MARTIN CLARENCE EUGENE TRE 247 S 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 247 S 5TH ST 26/02 $ 601.30 $ 45.00 $ 646.30 202606 HR 5502110173 PIEARSON HELEN C 143 S 6TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 143 S 6TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4053810760 TEJADA CARLOS A 2346 HIGHGATE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2346 HIGHGATE DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5133850049 BROWN NANCY 4611 OVEREND AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4611 OVEREND AVE 26/02 $ 618.76 $ 45.00 $ 663.76 202606 HR 5142700060 MCKINNEY CLEVELAND W TRE 621 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 621 20TH ST 26/02 $ 649.09 $ 45.00 $ 694.09 202606 HR 5441410130 SANCHEZ ANTONIA 357 S 15TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 357 S 15TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5290200053 WATERS ELIZABETH L 406 OLYMPUS#6 HERCULES CA 94547 1330 LINCOLN AVE 26/02 $ 546.74 $ 45.00 $ 591.74 202606 HR 4313600381 NICKS SANDRA G 4656 SETTING SUN DR RICHMOND CA 94803 4656 SETTING SUN DR 26/02 $ 823.75 $ 45.00 $ 868.75 202606 HR 5342010229 LOPEZ ABIGAIL E 511 RIPLEY AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 511 RIPLEY AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4352920047 FUSTON MICHAEL & JACQUELINE 2249 BRISTLECONE DR RICHMOND CA 94803 2249 BRISTLECONE DR 26/02 $ 613.39 $ 45.00 $ 658.39 202606 HR 5611720151 MENJIVAR MANUEL ANTONIO 1412 YORK ST RICHMOND CA 94801 1412 YORK ST 26/02 $ 564.89 $ 45.00 $ 609.89 202606 HR 5142600237 MARTINEZ EULALIO D & LENA 636 19TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 636 19TH ST 26/02 $ 561.40 $ 45.00 $ 606.40 202606 HR 5130750192 MCDONALD JOBY C TRE 3737 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3737 FLORIDA AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4312330592 KUMAR RAJINDER 5024 ESCALON CIR RICHMOND CA 94803 5024 ESCALON CIR 26/04 $ 428.59 $ 45.00 $ 473.59 202606 HR 5201210118 TOWNSEND LORNA CONTRERAS 692 YUBA ST RICHMOND CA 94805 692 YUBA ST 26/01 $ 406.25 $ 45.00 $ 451.25 202606 HR 5442220041 PAYSINGER LORENE TRE 2320 ALVA AVE EL CERRITO CA 94530 425 S 17TH ST 26/04 $ 1,258.49 $ 45.00 $ 1,303.49 202606 HR 5403500258 BUFORD NAILAH 1424 CONTRA COSTA AVE SAN PABLO CA 94806 1501 OHIO AVE 26/04 $ 4,268.94 $ 45.00 $ 4,313.94 202606 HR 4312620067 LONG REBECCA L 3404 MAY RD RICHMOND CA 94803 3404 MAY RD 26/04 $ 603.28 $ 45.00 $ 648.28 202606 HR 5612210087 MORALES GONZALO RIGOBERTO 900 RANDY LN SAN PABLO CA 94806 608 SANFORD AVE 26/03 $ 364.44 $ 45.00 $ 409.44 202606 HR 5092100105 KARKI SHISHIR 4592 BERK AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 1059 S 55TH ST 26/03 $ 483.97 $ 45.00 $ 528.97 202606 HR 5093500063 A3 ESTATE LLC 121 QUINT ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94124 982 CARLSON BLVD 26/03 $ 280.67 $ 45.00 $ 325.67 202606 HR 5300900114 RODRIGUEZ SERGIO TRE 423 DAYTON AVE SANTA CLARA CA 95051 1769 RHEEM AVE 26/03 $ 755.15 $ 45.00 $ 800.15 202606 HR 4056900253 BARNES SHERRI L TRE 2866 HILLTOP MALL RD RICHMOND CA 94806 2866 HILLTOP MALL RD 26/04 $ 423.13 $ 45.00 $ 468.13 202606 HR 4263510077 DARNAL BISHWANATH 1231 PARKWAY DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1231 PARKWAY DR 26/04 $ 424.30 $ 45.00 $ 469.30 202606 HR 4080530258 BUSTOS RODRIGO & MARTHA 616 WILLIAMS DR RICHMOND CA 94806 616 WILLIAMS DR 26/02 $ 612.31 $ 45.00 $ 657.31 202606 HR 4311530036 GALVEZ WILLIAM D 4465 FRAN WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 4465 FRAN WAY 26/02 $ 2,392.68 $ 45.00 $ 2,437.68 202606 HR 5093100161 HENDERSON RHODNEY DEWAINE 819 S 49TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 819 S 49TH ST 25/11 $ 244.99 $ 45.00 $ 289.99 202606 HR 5291100120 TURNER BARBARA JEAN EST OF 2033 N MAIN ST STE 750 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 861 15TH ST 26/02 $ 1,226.86 $ 45.00 $ 1,271.86 202606 HR 5130520033 DIAZ JACKSON 212 S 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 212 S 35TH ST 26/02 $ 627.71 $ 45.00 $ 672.71 202606 HR 5383000204 GEMJMF LLC P O BOX 9250 VALLEJO CA 94591 112 5TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5291400132 LOPEZ ANA M LEON 1605 GARVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1605 GARVIN AVE 26/02 $ 612.94 $ 45.00 $ 657.94 202606 HR 5140600064 HERNANDEZ LUIS E CIFUENTES 1918 NEVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1918 NEVIN AVE 26/02 $ 543.12 $ 45.00 $ 588.12 202606 HR 5283200029 OROZCO GUSTAVO 728 26TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 728 26TH ST 26/02 $ 619.40 $ 45.00 $ 664.40 202606 HR 5383000089 POWELL TIFFANY TRE 145 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 145 6TH ST 26/02 $ 619.10 $ 45.00 $ 664.10 202606 HR 5342210308 RUIZ ROMAN ZAVALA 662 2ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 662 2ND ST 26/02 $ 612.31 $ 45.00 $ 657.31 202606 HR 5012020193 MOBLEY JOE C & CAROL A 2415 SAN PABLO DAM RD STE SAN PABLO CA 94806 2238 KEY BLVD 26/04 $ 3,166.39 $ 45.00 $ 3,211.39 202606 HR 5150400074 PAYSINGER LORENE TRE 2320 ALVA AVE EL CERRITO CA 94530 619 CIVIC CENTER ST 26/04 $ 641.34 $ 45.00 $ 686.34 202606 HR 4055200044 BROWN ALBERT S & CORA D 3801 NORTH RIDGE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3801 NORTHRIDGE DR 26/04 $ 1,709.50 $ 45.00 $ 1,754.50 202606 HR 5342300075 PRUDENCIO SEGUNDO & SANDRA PO BOX 367 COLMA CA 94014 615 1ST ST 26/04 $ 823.54 $ 45.00 $ 868.54

Page 5 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5130360091 DUQUEZ ANGEL ESTUARDO & ERIKA 3020 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3020 FLORIDA AVE 26/04 $ 424.22 $ 45.00 $ 469.22 202606 HR 5301100359 LAWRENCE SHERRY D 2215 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2215 RHEEM AVE 26/04 $ 864.65 $ 45.00 $ 909.65 202606 HR 5141000132 LEVINE MAX 1442A WALNUT ST BERKELEY CA 94709 410 22ND ST 26/04 $ 1,301.62 $ 45.00 $ 1,346.62 202606 HR 4312900337 BROWN ANGELIQUE 4409 FIELDCREST DR RICHMOND CA 94803 4409 FIELDCREST DR 26/04 $ 438.34 $ 45.00 $ 483.34 202606 HR 5581640041 PT RICHMOND EQUITIES INC 952 SCHOOL ST #257 NAPA CA 94559 201 W RICHMOND AVE 26/04 $ 1,285.66 $ 45.00 $ 1,330.66 202606 HR 5291300241 GOMEZ ROLANDO R TRE 1454 QUESADA AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94124 1325 GARVIN AVE 26/03 $ 550.78 $ 45.00 $ 595.78 202606 HR 5440210184 ROBINSON VERNON V TRE 511 TIMBER CREEK DR RIO VISTA CA 94571 118 S 12TH ST 26/03 $ 821.11 $ 45.00 $ 866.11 202606 HR 5142100196 MURILLO JORGE LUIS ZAVALA 520 21ST ST RICHMOND CA 94801 520 21ST ST 26/04 $ 277.28 $ 45.00 $ 322.28 202606 HR 5130840118 JIREL MITRA BAHADUR 220 S 41ST ST RICHMOND CA 94804 220 S 41ST ST 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 5491020136 DICKEY JACQUES A 430 S 24TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 430 S 24TH ST 26/03 $ 473.35 $ 45.00 $ 518.35 202606 HR 5131310459 SMITH DONNA 4404 OVEREND AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4404 OVEREND AVE 26/03 $ 442.74 $ 45.00 $ 487.74 202606 HR 5501620255 SANTAMARIA ANA AMPARO 345 S 5TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 345 S 5TH ST 25/12 $ 177.56 $ 45.00 $ 222.56 202606 HR 5302800072 PAYSINGER LORENE TRE PO BOX 2863 RICHMOND CA 94802 1400 VISALIA AVE 26/02 $ 1,226.10 $ 45.00 $ 1,271.10 202606 HR 5091000199 MIRANDA ALBERTO & DORIS 5808 MADISON AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5808 MADISON AVE 26/02 $ 608.88 $ 45.00 $ 653.88 202606 HR 5171900060 HUNTER PEARL L 611 32ND ST RICHMONDCA 94804 427 38TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5131110057 ROBINSON APRIL L 255 S 43RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 255 S 43RD ST 26/02 $ 1,194.04 $ 45.00 $ 1,239.04 202606 HR 4055300174 VALLADARES PATRICIA 3135 LAKE VIEW CT RICHMOND CA 94806 3135 LAKE VIEW CT 26/02 $ 417.91 $ 45.00 $ 462.91 202606 HR 5301300090 VASQUEZ RONALD MARVIN CHICAS 1926 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1926 RHEEM AVE 26/02 $ 278.94 $ 45.00 $ 323.94 202606 HR 4142720087 GARCIA RODRIGUEZ 2743 CARDIFF CT RICHMOND CA 94806 2743 CARDIFF CT 26/02 $ 1,798.03 $ 45.00 $ 1,843.03 202606 HR 5501300049 GALVEZ CESAR CORTES 214 OHIO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 214 OHIO AVE 26/02 $ 417.91 $ 45.00 $ 462.91 202606 HR 4056500517 SAGUM ELIZABETH M 1164 BONNEVILLE CT RICHMOND CA 94806 1164 BONNEVILLE CT 26/02 $ 613.30 $ 45.00 $ 658.30 202606 HR 5240600113 OREGON RICARDO 929 34TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 929 34TH ST 26/02 $ 439.61 $ 45.00 $ 484.61 202606 HR 4142520057 JOHNSON MODISTINE 3019 BARKLEY DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3019 BARKLEY DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5093300019 BLACKMORE CLARK L 4616 CYPRESS AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4616 CYPRESS AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5383300166 WONG CHIN LONG 25309 MEREDITH CT HAYWARD CA 94545 119 3RD ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4143210153 MBAYE PENDA 4070 MOZART DR RICHMOND CA 94803 4070 MOZART DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5142200236 RAMIREZ GERARDO & HORTENSIA 540 22ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 540 22ND ST 26/02 $ 612.65 $ 45.00 $ 657.65 202606 HR 4351600699 KHAN TEHSEEN TRE 504 ISABEL DR MARTINEZ CA 94553 1045 TRAILSIDE DR 26/02 $ 609.76 $ 45.00 $ 654.76 202606 HR 5344020010 EL-SHERBENEY ALICE J TRE 1211 BARRETT AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1211 BARRETT AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5380800200 MENDEZ YASMIN 432 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 432 5TH ST 26/02 $ 496.28 $ 45.00 $ 541.28 202606 HR 5094000055 HENDERSON RHODNEY & SUNDRA 805 S 41ST ST RICHMONDCA 94804 805 S 41ST ST 26/02 $ 609.71 $ 45.00 $ 654.71 202606 HR 5133810100 BROOKS-WRIGHT ANN F 263 S 47TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 263 S 47TH ST 26/02 $ 613.40 $ 45.00 $ 658.40 202606 HR 4263610166 DOWNING ROBERT A 1161 FAIRWAY DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1161 FAIRWAY DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5131620170 RODRIGUEZ AMADOR 432 STEGE AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 432 STEGE AVE 26/02 $ 425.58 $ 45.00 $ 470.58 202606 HR 4053810349 CHEN ERIC B 2220 HIGHGATE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2220 HIGHGATE DR 26/02 $ 613.36 $ 45.00 $ 658.36 202606 HR 5611720052 MALDONADO CARLOS & VICTORIA 10 SNOWDRIFT CT EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 250 GERTRUDE AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4080330154 SINGLETON MICHELLE 617 GRIFFIN DR RICHMOND CA 94806 617 GRIFFIN DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5131410333 FUENTES JOSE S 320 S 38TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 320 S 38TH ST 26/02 $ 613.36 $ 45.00 $ 658.36 202606 HR 5403200024 LEUNG HONG WAH PO BOX 20306 SAN JOSE CA 95160 1210 CHANSLOR AVE 26/02 $ 613.40 $ 45.00 $ 658.40 202606 HR 5240600030 GALLARDO OSCAR D REYES 3320 MCBRYDE AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 3320 MCBRYDE AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5491600242 WELLS TONIA 1425 KAINS AVE BERKELEYCA 94702 2798 FOOTHILL AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5181020057 CRUZ J TRINIDAD & MARIA E 943 37TH ST RICHMONDCA 94805 651 38TH ST 26/02 $ 613.40 $ 45.00 $ 658.40 202606 HR 4311230256 HERNANDEZ DANIEL & KOURTNEY 2923 MAY RD RICHMOND CA 94803 2923 MAY RD 26/03 $ 717.24 $ 45.00 $ 762.24 202606 HR 5262400046 YOOSUF NASEER M 3000 LOWELL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2926 LOWELL AVE 26/03 $ 758.08 $ 45.00 $ 803.08 202606 HR 5242620051 DOUGHERTY H DENNIS JR 3521 SOLANO AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 3521 SOLANO AVE 26/07 $ 2,948.06 $ 45.00 $ 2,993.06 202606 HR 5230340092 PEARCE EMAGER 6145 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94618 849 HUMBOLDT ST 26/04 $ 1,640.74 $ 45.00 $ 1,685.74

Page 6 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5080300048 NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR HOMES 2015 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD REDONDO BEACH CA 90278 5328 GATELY AVE 25/12 $ 311.81 $ 45.00 $ 356.81 202606 HR 5130320053 GOMEZ JUAN E SANCHEZ 2931 CENTER AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2931 CENTER AVE 26/03 $ 438.18 $ 45.00 $ 483.18 202606 HR 5230930140 REED LAMONT & REBECCA 5511 ESMOND AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 5511 ESMOND AVE 26/02 $ 624.76 $ 45.00 $ 669.76 202606 HR 5440820198 CHISOLM LELA J TRE 2716 BEACH HEAD WAY RICHMOND CA 94804 2029 MAINE AVE 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 4261910519 RYAN MARGARET M 228 PARK LN RICHMOND CA 94803 228 PARK LN 26/02 $ 551.15 $ 45.00 $ 596.15 202606 HR 5181500108 GARDNER JONATHAN M 3511 CERRITO AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 3511 CERRITO AVE 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5340630143 MACIAS SUSANA 911 PENNSYLVANIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 911 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4142320078 HOWARD THERESA E 3032 COLETTE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3032 COLETTE DR 26/02 $ 244.52 $ 45.00 $ 289.52 202606 HR 5092100105 KARKI SHISHIR 4592 BERK AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 1059 S 55TH ST 25/11 $ 258.71 $ 45.00 $ 303.71 202606 HR 5382000098 PINEDA CARLOS O 54 PALMDALE AVE DALY CITY CA 94015 247 4TH ST 26/02 $ 417.91 $ 45.00 $ 462.91 202606 HR 5153900146 HUNTER CECILY G & DANIEL P 36 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 36 29TH ST 26/02 $ 417.91 $ 45.00 $ 462.91 202606 HR 5383200234 LAU PUI NI BEVERLY 23 SAM MUN TSAI RD RICHMOND CA 999077 122 3RD ST 26/02 $ 646.18 $ 45.00 $ 691.18 202606 HR 5130210072 ALHUZAIBI NAJI NORMAN MOHSEN 800 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 2607 OHIO AVE 26/02 $ 1,558.40 $ 45.00 $ 1,603.40 202606 HR 5380210095 EDWARDS RICO 439 B ST RICHMOND CA 94801 439 B ST 26/02 $ 1,096.67 $ 45.00 $ 1,141.67 202606 HR 4311240057 DELIJANI ROUZBEH 4626 WINSOR WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 4626 WINSOR WAY 25/11 $ 216.92 $ 45.00 $ 261.92 202606 HR 4056000112 KWAN DUSTIN 6251 168TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 3320 PARK RIDGE DR 25/11 $ 384.64 $ 45.00 $ 429.64 202606 HR 4055700365 DEERING JAHCOREE 1204 COSMOS CT RICHMOND CA 94806 1204 COSMOS CT 26/02 $ 445.41 $ 45.00 $ 490.41 202606 HR 5404801218 SAUCER PAMELA 449 METRO WALK WAY RICHMOND CA 94801 449 METRO WALK WAY 26/02 $ 486.20 $ 45.00 $ 531.20 202606 HR 5440310190 WARD ROBBIE 126 MARINA WAY S RICHMOND CA 94804 118 MARINA WAY S 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5131120106 SIWAKOTI SANDESH 1613 BAYO VISTA AVE SAN PABLO CA 94806 248 S 43RD ST 26/02 $ 1,390.00 $ 45.00 $ 1,435.00 202606 HR 5240800218 BARONE BERNARD 926 31ST ST RICHMOND CA 94804 926 31ST ST 26/04 $ 554.60 $ 45.00 $ 599.60 202606 HR 5192900172 12246 SAN PABLO AVENUE LLC 988 FRANKLIN ST APT 1002 OAKLAND CA 94607 12246 SAN PABLO AVE 26/04 $ 614.14 $ 45.00 $ 659.14 202606 HR 5101020161 MICKA ROBERT G III 5705 COLUMBIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5705 COLUMBIA AVE 26/05 $ 499.92 $ 45.00 $ 544.92 202606 HR 5130440042 MCKENZIE PETER TRE 102 S 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 102 S 35TH ST 26/06 $ 631.30 $ 45.00 $ 676.30 202606 HR 5270610099 SCHEER ANDREW MICHAEL 94 MALTA DR SAN FRANCISCO CA 94131 1600 26TH ST 26/02 $ 460.36 $ 45.00 $ 505.36 202606 HR 4054700242 MARTIN ERIC WESLEY 2427 BRANCHWOOD CT RICHMOND CA 94806 2427 BRANCHWOOD CT 26/02 $ 595.81 $ 45.00 $ 640.81 202606 HR 5262800021 LIVING HOPE NEIGHBORHOOD CH 2800 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2818 RHEEM AVE 26/03 $ 428.22 $ 45.00 $ 473.22 202606 HR 5283600178 TAYLOR DWIGHT THOMAS TRE 6447 ARLINGTON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94805 2323 CLINTON AVE 26/04 $ 2,389.40 $ 45.00 $ 2,434.40 202606 HR 5140900068 SIMMONS HAROLD J & CASSANDRA 321 23RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 321 23RD ST 26/04 $ 1,308.46 $ 45.00 $ 1,353.46 202606 HR 4334230242 CARMAGNOLA LAURENCE & ANNA 256 WALKER ST GARDNERVILLE NV 89410 1388 FASCINATION CIR 26/04 $ 321.19 $ 45.00 $ 366.19 202606 HR 5154000011 TEASLEY CHERYL LYNN 74 GROVE ST RICHMOND CA 94804 74 GROVE ST 26/04 $ 640.27 $ 45.00 $ 685.27 202606 HR 5442010186 JACKSON ANDRE 419 S 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 415 S 20TH ST 415-419 26/04 $ 1,747.84 $ 45.00 $ 1,792.84 202606 HR 4080540083 GARCIA MILBA QUINTERO TRE 1140 ILLINOIS ST FAIRFIELD CA 94533 500 HARRISON DR 26/01 $ 184.15 $ 45.00 $ 229.15 202606 HR 4252610383 GONZALEZ JOSE 3116 SERENE CT RICHMOND CA 94803 3116 SERENE CT 26/04 $ 654.60 $ 45.00 $ 699.60 202606 HR 5172110180 MASHAL MOHAMMED S & ABEER 322 39TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 322 39TH ST 26/04 $ 1,640.74 $ 45.00 $ 1,685.74 202606 HR 5134020352 WATSON ERIC 820 47TH ST EMERYVILLE CA 94608 4396 BERK AVE 26/04 $ 492.82 $ 45.00 $ 537.82 202606 HR 4311930210 GLASSER GARY 3109 KEITH DR EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 3109 KEITH DR 26/04 $ 603.22 $ 45.00 $ 648.22 202606 HR 5130750101 TROTTER ARNESHA MARIE TRE PO BOX 5003 REDWOOD CITY CA 94063 3816 CENTER AVE 26/04 $ 651.84 $ 45.00 $ 696.84 202606 HR 4080220215 MORON LIZBETH SILVIA JARA 708 PHANOR DR RICHMOND CA 94806 708 PHANOR DR 26/04 $ 1,246.67 $ 45.00 $ 1,291.67 202606 HR 5581920039 SMITH COTTRELL E TRE 420 WESTERN DR RICHMOND CA 94801 420 WESTERN DR 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 5382310414 JONES LILLIE MAE 258 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 258 6TH ST 26/04 $ 683.47 $ 45.00 $ 728.47 202606 HR 5100930287 PAYSINGER LORENE TRE 2320 ALVA AVE EL CERRITO CA 94530 2425 SAN JOAQUIN ST 26/04 $ 3,864.36 $ 45.00 $ 3,909.36 202606 HR 5080700106 MCCAIN CAITLN A 1369 MARIPOSA ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1369 MARIPOSA ST 26/04 $ 823.03 $ 45.00 $ 868.03 202606 HR 5130920316 ZHANG YANTING 270 EL NIDO RD PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 4228 OHIO AVE 26/04 $ 650.68 $ 45.00 $ 695.68 202606 HR 5340320299 VILLASENOR JESSE 815 10TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 815 10TH ST 26/04 $ 480.00 $ 45.00 $ 525.00 202606 HR 5380700194 ZULUETA ANTONIO C 413 NEVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 413 NEVIN AVE 26/04 $ 446.04 $ 45.00 $ 491.04

Page 7 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 4142420217 GRAY MICHAEL 2837 SHANE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2837 SHANE DR 26/04 $ 603.07 $ 45.00 $ 648.07 202606 HR 5491920228 MAFUAHINGANO MELE M 524 S 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 524 S 29TH ST 26/04 $ 856.07 $ 45.00 $ 901.07 202606 HR 5292620282 PENADO JOSE FRANCISCO TRE 1715 PENNSYLVANIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1715 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 26/04 $ 799.20 $ 45.00 $ 844.20 202606 HR 5491920129 VARGAS JOSEFINA 525 S 30TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 525 S 30TH ST 26/04 $ 2,580.79 $ 45.00 $ 2,625.79 202606 HR 5440810074 WORMER JOSEPH VAN 200 S 19TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 200 S 19TH ST 26/05 $ 690.68 $ 45.00 $ 735.68 202606 HR 4142610171 BIAN CHEN G 3273 WITHERS AVE LAFAYETTE CA 94549 2804 SHANE DR 26/06 $ 653.30 $ 45.00 $ 698.30 202606 HR 5131410135 DELAOLIVA CARMEN 3815 CUTTING BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 3815 CUTTING BLVD 26/05 $ 277.21 $ 45.00 $ 322.21 202606 HR 4055300158 OMOREGLE EGBEBALAKHAMEN 3131 LAKE VIEW CT RICHMOND CA 94806 3131 LAKE VIEW CT 26/05 $ 745.93 $ 45.00 $ 790.93 202606 HR 5341910098 VENEGAS MIGUEL ANGEL ESCORZA 5019 MCBRYDE AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 719 ELM AVE 26/05 $ 755.53 $ 45.00 $ 800.53 202606 HR 5291600103 CHAVEZ MAIRA 1930 GAYNOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1930 GAYNOR AVE 25/12 $ 221.08 $ 45.00 $ 266.08 202606 HR 5182300110 MARZIANO JOHN C & DOLORES A 540 CLAYTON AVE EL CERRITOCA 94530 2909 ROOSEVELT AVE 26/06 $ 677.50 $ 45.00 $ 722.50 202606 HR 5140700120 PERATA LLOYD D TRE 402 MILL RD RICHMOND CA 94553 2015 MACDONALD AVE 26/03 $ 12,275.40 $ 45.00 $ 12,320.40 202606 HR 4321220065 NUNEZ ALEJANDRO & MARIA 5237 BUCKBOARD WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 5237 BUCKBOARD WAY 26/06 $ 712.73 $ 45.00 $ 757.73 202606 HR 5270920076 KUANG SHENG N & DIANA Q 166 EDINBURGH ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 1415 26TH ST 26/04 $ 634.15 $ 45.00 $ 679.15 202606 HR 5241000271 MUNOZ URIEL A 982 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 982 29TH ST 26/04 $ 655.10 $ 45.00 $ 700.10 202606 HR 5160200019 MARTINEZ LUIS ESTRADA 3000 ROOSEVELT AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3000 ROOSEVELT AVE 26/04 $ 448.33 $ 45.00 $ 493.33 202606 HR 5140900076 HASAN DONALD HASAIN TRE 275 DUPERU DR CROCKETT CA 94525 2229 MACDONALD AVE 26/04 $ 3,393.26 $ 45.00 $ 3,438.26 202606 HR 4080410014 MANNING DOROTHY 3908 MC GLOTHEN WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 3908 MCGLOTHEN WAY 26/04 $ 538.07 $ 45.00 $ 583.07 202606 HR 5131310335 KINCHEN MARY SUE EST OF 926 AVIS DR EL CERRITO CA 94530 4124 OVEREND AVE 26/04 $ 1,301.48 $ 45.00 $ 1,346.48 202606 HR 5131320128 LEONES MAGDALENA E EST OF 47 RESERVOIR PL FALLING WATERS WV 25419 4333 OVEREND AVE 26/04 $ 401.28 $ 45.00 $ 446.28 202606 HR 5291300027 MACIAS MONALISHI PO BOX 70692 RICHMOND CA 94807 828 13TH ST 26/04 $ 433.96 $ 45.00 $ 478.96 202606 HR 5170400070 MOORE ARLENE E 519 41ST ST RICHMOND CA 94805 519 41ST ST 26/04 $ 310.46 $ 45.00 $ 355.46 202606 HR 5441500161 CANAS DALILA M 338 S 16TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 338 S 16TH ST 26/03 $ 550.08 $ 45.00 $ 595.08 202606 HR 5131740218 3316 CUTTING LLC PO BOX 347300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94134 3322 CUTTING BLVD 26/04 $ 1,308.00 $ 45.00 $ 1,353.00 202606 HR 5402600307 VU HUNG QUOC 1445 ELM ST RICHMOND CA 94530 161 MARINA WAY 159-167 (6 UNITS) 26/04 $ 2,867.44 $ 45.00 $ 2,912.44 202606 HR 5342710380 PAVLOVSKY NATALYA 123 FEY DR BURLINGAME CA 94010 219 BARRETT AVE 26/04 $ 1,430.50 $ 45.00 $ 1,475.50 202606 HR 5142400067 MORA ALEXANDRA G MALDONADO 625 22ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 625 22ND ST 26/04 $ 818.42 $ 45.00 $ 863.42 202606 HR 5261200058 BALAL FAROUK & SABRINA 39505 SUTTER DR FREMONT CA 94538 3234 LOWELL AVE 26/04 $ 1,196.42 $ 45.00 $ 1,241.42 202606 HR 5093500352 HERNANDEZ CLAUDIA R 968 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 968 CARLSON BLVD 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 4321410229 MARTINEZ JESUS 5171 CARRIAGE DR RICHMOND CA 94803 5171 CARRIAGE DR 26/05 $ 545.18 $ 45.00 $ 590.18 202606 HR 5131310285 DAVIS JAYNA 420 S 41ST ST RICHMONDCA 94804 420 S 41ST ST 26/04 $ 1,473.59 $ 45.00 $ 1,518.59 202606 HR 5606400231 FISHER LULA MAE PO BOX 2585 SAUSALITO CA 94966 1430 HOFFMAN BLVD 26/04 $ 443.30 $ 45.00 $ 488.30 202606 HR 5384300066 GONZALEZ JOSE M 910 CHANSLOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 910 CHANSLOR AVE 26/03 $ 467.52 $ 45.00 $ 512.52 202606 HR 4092100074 MEJIA JIMMY I 1825 1ST ST RICHMOND CA 94801 1825 1ST ST 26/04 $ 411.76 $ 45.00 $ 456.76 202606 HR 5262800138 DO NASCIMENTO JASIEL PEREIRA 1071 INGERSON AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94124 2873 LOWELL AVE 26/06 $ 379.87 $ 45.00 $ 424.87 202606 HR 5151700209 GRACE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 2369 BARRETT AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2369 BARRETT AVE 26/03 $ 3,010.58 $ 45.00 $ 3,055.58 202606 HR 5083400142 CHAN KA 6048 WENK AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 10887 SAN PABLO AVE 26/04 $ 4,860.38 $ 45.00 $ 4,905.38 202606 HR 4056600721 MA MASON 5001 PAR CT RICHMOND CA 94806 5001 PAR CT 26/04 $ 650.59 $ 45.00 $ 695.59 202606 HR 4140810039 MONDY CHARLES J & TERRI A 3033 JO ANN DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3033 JO ANN DR 26/04 $ 556.38 $ 45.00 $ 601.38 202606 HR 5172720251 TRACY TRADE LLC 4724 MACDONALD AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 4724 MACDONALD AVE 26/04 $ 4,742.11 $ 45.00 $ 4,787.11 202606 HR 4053810372 WESTBROOK EPOSI TRE 2209 HIGHGATE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2209 HIGHGATE DR 26/04 $ 586.69 $ 45.00 $ 631.69 202606 HR 5343400247 DOBASHI AIED S 2222 62ND AVE OAKLAND CA 94605 564 HARBOUR WAY 26/04 $ 2,248.58 $ 45.00 $ 2,293.58 202606 HR 5262800153 NASCIMENTO JASIEL P 1071 INGERSON AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94124 2859 LOWELL AVE 26/05 $ 495.65 $ 45.00 $ 540.65 202606 HR 5201310165 DELANCEY DEARLD II & ASIA 658 SONOMA ST RICHMOND CA 94805 658 SONOMA ST 26/01 $ 234.24 $ 45.00 $ 279.24 202606 HR 5383410163 WORLD SUPPORT LLC 1442A WALNUT ST #505 BERKELEY CA 94709 121 2ND ST 26/04 $ 614.80 $ 45.00 $ 659.80 202606 HR 5440620093 NAVARRO GUSTAVO A JR PO BOX 460014 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94146 109 S 23RD ST 26/01 $ 162.17 $ 45.00 $ 207.17

Page 8 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5381430148 HILL TABETTE LYNN 354 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 354 6TH ST 26/04 $ 512.17 $ 45.00 $ 557.17 202606 HR 5132380048 MINIX CHARLES EDWARD JR 1359 ENCORE DR FAIRFIELD CA 94534 530 S 49TH ST 26/03 $ 427.38 $ 45.00 $ 472.38 202606 HR 5133160498 GIDEON VICTORIA ELAINE 4644 OVEREND AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4644 OVEREND AVE 26/03 $ 800.68 $ 45.00 $ 845.68 202606 HR 5081800103 WOODARD TERRELL E & DORA J 1531 OSCAR ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1531 OSCAR ST 26/03 $ 437.64 $ 45.00 $ 482.64 202606 HR 5492020218 WILLIAMS AUDRA MICHELE 644 S 29TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 644 S 29TH ST 26/03 $ 836.58 $ 45.00 $ 881.58 202606 HR 5340320208 PHILLIPS MARQUES M 835 10TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 835 10TH ST 25/12 $ 152.90 $ 45.00 $ 197.90 202606 HR 5603200170 SURPLUS PROP AUTHORITY RICH 1317 CANAL BLVD RICHMONDCA 94804 1319 CANAL BLVD 25/12 $ 3,723.94 $ 45.00 $ 3,768.94 202606 HR 5133960418 THOMPSON JOHNNIE TRE 5103 POTRERO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5103 POTRERO AVE 26/03 $ 606.82 $ 45.00 $ 651.82 202606 HR 4140220122 MITCHELL MATTIE L 3033 SHANE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3033 SHANE DR 26/03 $ 477.14 $ 45.00 $ 522.14 202606 HR 5340320026 ESCOBAR GUMERCINDO J GARCIA 880 9TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 880 9TH ST 26/04 $ 629.06 $ 45.00 $ 674.06 202606 HR 5608302039 HABIBI MOHDI 848 MARINA WAY S RICHMOND CA 94804 848 MARINA WAY S 26/04 $ 439.82 $ 45.00 $ 484.82 202606 HR 5240400019 DRIOTEZ MARTHA S 3500 MCBRYDE AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 3500 MCBRYDE AVE 26/03 $ 284.05 $ 45.00 $ 329.05 202606 HR 4056900543 SANCHEZ ALEX 721 SUMMER LN RICHMOND CA 94806 721 SUMMER LN 26/04 $ 632.48 $ 45.00 $ 677.48 202606 HR 5443320246 AMERICAN CATHOLIC UNION 600 S 16TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 600 S 16TH ST 26/04 $ 1,318.36 $ 45.00 $ 1,363.36 202606 HR 4056600762 WINTERTON LISA MARIE 5017 MATCH CT RICHMOND CA 94806 5017 MATCH CT 26/04 $ 648.42 $ 45.00 $ 693.42 202606 HR 5130610198 CLARK STEPHANIE R TRE 3718 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3718 FLORIDA AVE 26/01 $ 76.79 $ 45.00 $ 121.79 202606 HR 5292620167 RUFFIN YOLANDA D 1740 BURBECK AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1740 BURBECK AVE 26/04 $ 337.46 $ 45.00 $ 382.46 202606 HR 5490710240 DOBASHI AHMED 3480 RIDGEWOOD WAY SAN PABLO CA 94806 2901 CUTTING BLVD 26/04 $ 1,716.50 $ 45.00 $ 1,761.50 202606 HR 4082300775 LOZANO JUAN ANTONIO JR 215 RUBY AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 215 RUBY AVE 26/01 $ 115.01 $ 45.00 $ 160.01 202606 HR 5342120184 RAMIREZ FERNANDO G 636 3RD ST RICHMOND CA 94801 636 3RD ST 26/02 $ 612.31 $ 45.00 $ 657.31 202606 HR 5341720091 STALLWORTH NELSON HOSEA 620 11TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 620 11TH ST 26/02 $ 492.96 $ 45.00 $ 537.96 202606 HR 5403700221 ANSON ELVIS W 30 17TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 30 17TH ST 26/02 $ 582.05 $ 45.00 $ 627.05 202606 HR 5182900232 MOORE ROBERT B & GWEN A 626 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 626 35TH ST 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 5492040364 THEODOSI JOHN A & JANICE L TRE 3278 ISOLA WAY LAFAYETTECA 94549 660 S 31ST ST 26/02 $ 398.46 $ 45.00 $ 443.46 202606 HR 5281800093 HERRERA-MCDONOUGH IRENE 1341 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BERKELEY CA 94709 2522 ESMOND AVE 26/02 $ 1,196.03 $ 45.00 $ 1,241.03 202606 HR 5282000032 USRE INVESTMENTS INC 28239 LANGSIDE AVE SANTA CLARITA CA 91351 2820 ESMOND AVE 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 4140520224 ALONSO JOSE LUIS 2981 GILMA DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2981 GILMA DR 26/02 $ 1,081.69 $ 45.00 $ 1,126.69 202606 HR 5383500070 RAMIREZ HIPOLITO B 36 1ST ST RICHMOND CA 94801 36 1ST ST 26/02 $ 588.38 $ 45.00 $ 633.38 202606 HR 5611810432 PANG DAVID HO 480 4TH AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94118 513 GERTRUDE AVE 26/02 $ 619.13 $ 45.00 $ 664.13 202606 HR 5343010145 ARGUETA MARIA VILMA 527 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 527 6TH ST 26/02 $ 866.86 $ 45.00 $ 911.86 202606 HR 5341720224 MERCADO MAURILIO JR 2643 APPIAN WAY STE K PINOLE CA 94564 609 12TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4054700473 CHEUNG MUAN CHOY 2445 GROVEVIEW CT RICHMOND CA 94806 2445 GROVEVIEW CT 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5292520045 VALDIVIA JAVIER G & SANDRA J 707 FALCON CT RICHMONDCA 94806 745 17TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.15 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.15 202606 HR 5093500360 HARDY ROBERT E 972 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 972 CARLSON BLVD 26/02 $ 435.58 $ 45.00 $ 480.58 202606 HR 5490420212 HOPKINS HELEN M 2622 MAINE AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2622 MAINE AVE 26/02 $ 612.59 $ 45.00 $ 657.59 202606 HR 5440910049 REDON OLIVIER 270 EL NIDO RD PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 246 S 17TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5342210142 BARRIENTOS MANUEL & VILMA 215 RIPLEY AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 215 RIPLEY AVE 26/02 $ 632.29 $ 45.00 $ 677.29 202606 HR 5341110061 LLOYD MARVA J TRE 3444 COLCHESTER AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95834 312 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 26/02 $ 602.64 $ 45.00 $ 647.64 202606 HR 5440210093 WALKER CAROLYN J 151 S 13TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 151 S 13TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5241800241 HU YAN 15 MCCORMICK RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 3633 GARVIN AVE 26/02 $ 1,204.60 $ 45.00 $ 1,249.60 202606 HR 4142530114 YOUNG BARBARA C TRE 2900 BARKLEY DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2900 BARKLEY DR 26/02 $ 613.51 $ 45.00 $ 658.51 202606 HR 4080330014 JACOBS KIM 4113 MC GLOTHEN WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 4113 MCGLOTHEN WAY 26/02 $ 613.30 $ 45.00 $ 658.30 202606 HR 5303400112 CHAMBERS LARRY & BREZELL W 2202 VISALIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2202 VISALIA AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4263110084 THOMAS KATHLEEN A 1055 PARKSIDE DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1055 PARKSIDE DR 26/02 $ 613.40 $ 45.00 $ 658.40 202606 HR 4263610208 PAGE MICHAEL P & CAROLYN 1177 FAIRWAY DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1177 FAIRWAY DR 26/02 $ 575.68 $ 45.00 $ 620.68 202606 HR 4191950023 MAHMOUD ADEL M JR 6305 JERILYNN AVE RICHMOND CA 94806 6305 JERILYNN AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45

Page 9 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5093700119 JACKSON LLOYD L 5118 WOODMONT CT ANTIOCH CA 94531 831 S 45TH ST 26/02 $ 602.64 $ 45.00 $ 647.64 202606 HR 5181110163 DAYEM JAWAD TRE 690 MESA WAY RICHMOND CA 94805 690 MESA WAY 26/02 $ 797.47 $ 45.00 $ 842.47 202606 HR 5134030286 JOHNSON GERTRUDE TRE 4116 BELL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4116 BELL AVE 26/02 $ 422.77 $ 45.00 $ 467.77 202606 HR 5381810166 CRUZ MARIA D TRE 230 2ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 231 2ND ST 26/02 $ 613.40 $ 45.00 $ 658.40 202606 HR 4080320213 ESTRADA ANA 4113 LEKE WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 4113 LEKE WAY 26/02 $ 1,243.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,288.85 202606 HR 5442320122 DAVENPORT MICHAEL TRE 446 MARINA WAY S RICHMOND CA 94804 446 MARINA WAY S 26/02 $ 1,195.84 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.84 202606 HR 5441620142 THOMAS BRIAN H 353 S 19TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 353 S 19TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5132940171 GLASCO BURL J 4803 CASTILLA AVE RICHMONDCA 94804 4803 CASTILLA AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5130340044 REDIC ULIS G & GAYLE D TRE 431 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3125 FLORIDA AVE 26/02 $ 613.36 $ 45.00 $ 658.36 202606 HR 4352220182 BAVARO ANTONE F & LORENE L TRE 20195 PINE DR W VOLCANO CA 95689 4685 UPLAND DR 26/02 $ 229.12 $ 45.00 $ 274.12 202606 HR 5154110158 JUARBE FRANCISCO 112 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 112 29TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5072700551 KOON THESSILON JUAN 5195 DALAI LAMA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5195 DALAI LAMA AVE 26/02 $ 252.68 $ 45.00 $ 297.68 202606 HR 5502020067 IKONIK PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 3400 COTTAGE WAY FL 4 SACRAMENTO CA 95825 220 S 6TH ST 26/04 $ 650.81 $ 45.00 $ 695.81 202606 HR 4353100136 BARILLAS ROCHELLE G & BILLI 5401 ALLISON LN RICHMOND CA 94803 5401 ALLISON LN 26/04 $ 547.74 $ 45.00 $ 592.74 202606 HR 5491600309 LIU YUN 5 LOBOS ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 2729 FOOTHILL AVE 26/04 $ 649.27 $ 45.00 $ 694.27 202606 HR 5240100155 HAN WU PIN 1737 WALNUT ST EL CERRITOCA 94530 12801 SAN PABLO AVE 26/04 $ 760.36 $ 45.00 $ 805.36 202606 HR 5340820371 GARCIA EPIGMENIO HERNANDEZ 745 6TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 745 6TH ST 26/04 $ 650.56 $ 45.00 $ 695.56 202606 HR 5341410016 NAVARRO ANA 225 PINE AVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA 680 9TH ST 26/02 $ 544.54 $ 45.00 $ 589.54 202606 HR 4313520159 WALKER TINA M & MANUEL P JR 3809 PAINTED PONY RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 3809 PAINTED PONY RD 26/02 $ 949.53 $ 45.00 $ 994.53 202606 HR 5492020200 BENTON JANICE 2901 CHAVEZ LN RICHMOND CA 94804 2901 CHAVEZ LN 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5131200155 MEADOWS ANNIE RUTH 270 S 44TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 270 S 44TH ST 26/02 $ 562.13 $ 45.00 $ 607.13 202606 HR 5134020030 CLEMENT DESIREE TRE 740 DEVILS DROP CT EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 727 S 45TH ST 26/02 $ 613.30 $ 45.00 $ 658.30 202606 HR 5130360190 FOKUS INVESTMENTS INC 469 METRO WALK WAY RICHMOND CA 94801 3136 FLORIDA AVE 26/02 $ 614.14 $ 45.00 $ 659.14 202606 HR 5132360156 CHEN XUANDA 406 S 49TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 608 S 49TH ST 26/02 $ 916.43 $ 45.00 $ 961.43 202606 HR 5131110032 THOMASSON MARCUS 4225 WALL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4225 WALL AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5500810063 POVTAR OLESSYA 2745 ANZA ST APT 3 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94121 114 MAINE AVE 25/12 $ 774.06 $ 45.00 $ 819.06 202606 HR 5170700057 GAUCHAN MAHASHUSH 531 44TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 531 44TH ST 26/02 $ 500.59 $ 45.00 $ 545.59 202606 HR 5502010068 LINARES EDGAR 222 S 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 222 S 5TH ST 26/02 $ 648.35 $ 45.00 $ 693.35 202606 HR 4311230058 KUMAR JAINEIL 2812 SHELDON DR RICHMOND CA 94803 2812 SHELDON DR 26/02 $ 259.33 $ 45.00 $ 304.33 202606 HR 5582920152 UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 4471 VALLEJO CA 94590 429 W RICHMOND AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4092300237 HERNANDEZ MILAGRO AVALOS 1856 2ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 1856 2ND ST 26/02 $ 612.20 $ 45.00 $ 657.20 202606 HR 5340710093 CERDA FERNANDO CRUZ 758 8TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 758 8TH ST 26/02 $ 610.22 $ 45.00 $ 655.22 202606 HR 5341920097 VALENCIA RAUL 711 RIPLEY AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 711 RIPLEY AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5490810115 WILSON CARRIE LEE 1337 MARIPOSA ST RICHMOND CA 94804 2721 CUTTING BLVD 26/02 $ 557.93 $ 45.00 $ 602.93 202606 HR 5282300176 LEE AUDREY 430 RAMSELL ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94132 2533 GARVIN AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4142820036 GAINES JAMIE LYNNELL 2916 OXFORD AVE RICHMOND CA 94806 2916 OXFORD AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5082210161 HOWARD YOLANDA M 1640 MARIPOSA ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1640 MARIPOSA ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4056600275 COLLOR CHESTER L 5409 STONY CT RICHMOND CA 94806 5409 STONY CT 26/02 $ 449.35 $ 45.00 $ 494.35 202606 HR 5090600049 CANNEDY LIYANNA 5351 CREELY AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5351 CREELY AVE 26/02 $ 613.56 $ 45.00 $ 658.56 202606 HR 5160700190 HURTADO-SANCHEZ ANGELICA Y 534 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 534 35TH ST 26/02 $ 460.36 $ 45.00 $ 505.36 202606 HR 5092300325 HENDRIX BOBBY JR 3316 CASA GRANDE DR SAN RAMON CA 94583 5020 FLEMING AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5503010182 FLETCHER PRISCILLA M 417 HARBOUR WAY S RICHMOND CA 94804 417 HARBOUR WAY S 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5133960442 GONZALEZ BRICIO RODRIGUEZ 5001 POTRERO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5001 POTRERO AVE 26/02 $ 970.66 $ 45.00 $ 1,015.66 202606 HR 4092620188 TECUM ENCARNACION L 1917 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 1917 5TH ST 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 4142340019 ESCOTO FELIPE DE JESUS ORTEGA 3005 COLETTE DR SAN PABLO CA 94806 2806 WISWALL DR 26/04 $ 466.62 $ 45.00 $ 511.62 202606 HR 5380700236 MOLINA ARCADIO A AVILA 162 S 17TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 428 4TH ST 26/04 $ 459.37 $ 45.00 $ 504.37

Page 10 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 4263420707 VILLASICA PATRICK 60 GREENVIEW LN RICHMOND CA 94803 60 GREENVIEW LN 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5383500195 PAVLOVSKY ALEX 2643 APPAIN WAY UNIT C PINOLE CA 94564 19 2ND ST 26/02 $ 852.48 $ 45.00 $ 897.48 202606 HR 5280200063 SERRANO MARCUS 2504 HUMPHREY AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2504 HUMPHREY AVE 26/02 $ 1,243.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,288.85 202606 HR 5401900120 GUTIERREZ JOSE J 2001 CHANSLOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2001 CHANSLOR AVE 26/02 $ 475.07 $ 45.00 $ 520.07 202606 HR 4313520019 STEPHENS CLAUDELL 3804 PAINTED PONY RD RICHMOND CA 94803 3804 PAINTED PONY RD 26/02 $ 1,297.74 $ 45.00 $ 1,342.74 202606 HR 5580810074 PINKHASOV ALEKSANDR 78 SCENIC AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 78 SCENIC AVE 26/02 $ 1,236.32 $ 45.00 $ 1,281.32 202606 HR 4080440045 ORTIZ PABLO CORTES 4001 JENKINS WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 4001 JENKINS WAY 25/11 $ 26.93 $ 45.00 $ 71.93 202606 HR 5441310058 AFEWERK SENAIT TRE 939 PLYMOUTH AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 331 S 13TH ST 26/02 $ 613.51 $ 45.00 $ 658.51 202606 HR 5612520204 GREER BETTYE J TRE 3719 BARRINGTON DR CONCORD CA 94518 1428 CHERRY ST 26/02 $ 483.56 $ 45.00 $ 528.56 202606 HR 5161600027 SMITH LA RONE T & RENE K 2928 BARRETT AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2928 BARRETT AVE 26/02 $ 619.68 $ 45.00 $ 664.68 202606 HR 5606400207 BLAKELY ROBIN Y 1524 HOFFMAN BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 1524 HOFFMAN BLVD 26/02 $ 356.54 $ 45.00 $ 401.54 202606 HR 5261600026 AULAKH HARPREET S 3321 TULARE AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3321 TULARE AVE 25/11 $ 80.09 $ 45.00 $ 125.09 202606 HR 4263610091 RICHARDSON JEROME & WANDA W 1291 PARKWAY DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1291 PARKWAY DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5154120132 NEW CHANCE LLC 12622 RAMONA AVE HAWTHORNE CA 90250 2737 EUCLID AVE 25/11 $ 308.69 $ 45.00 $ 353.69 202606 HR 4093110080 RAMIREZ SAMUEL 2534 MAY RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 1829 SOTO ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5343110085 RUSSELL BEVERLY DENISE 571 8TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 571 8TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 4055400982 HENRY SHARON L 599 ROCK ROSE WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 599 ROCK ROSE WAY 26/02 $ 886.28 $ 45.00 $ 931.28 202606 HR 5092600161 THOMPSON ROBIN 1007 CAMPBELL ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1007 CAMPBELL ST 26/02 $ 1,165.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,210.85 202606 HR 4262910047 RODRIGUEZ EDUARDO ALONSO 1905 BONITA AVE BERKELEY CA 94704 861 PARKSIDE DR 26/02 $ 605.76 $ 45.00 $ 650.76 202606 HR 5343300199 NICKLEBERRY ELAINE 1400 ENCLAVE TRL STOCKBRIDGE GA 30281 555 HARBOUR WAY 26/04 $ 960.61 $ 45.00 $ 1,005.61 202606 HR 5081500018 BAKER PAUL M 1405 SAN JOAQUIN ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1405 SAN JOAQUIN ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5341610037 KAUR BEERA TRE 2817 E CASTLE PINES TER DUBLIN CA 94568 630 12TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5380500081 LOBATO JOHNNY DAVID 457 3RD ST RICHMOND CA 94801 457 3RD ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5401500201 BATO LITA C 727 GELLERT BLVD DALY CITY CA 94015 228 15TH ST 25/08 $ 70.80 $ 45.00 $ 115.80 202606 HR 5342120150 MARTINEZ FRANCISCO CHONG 624 3RD ST RICHMOND CA 94801 624 3RD ST 26/02 $ 445.50 $ 45.00 $ 490.50 202606 HR 5402100068 TAYLOR JONATHAN 89 CRYSTAL COVE CT RICHMOND CA 94804 1826 BISSELL AVE 26/02 $ 431.27 $ 45.00 $ 476.27 202606 HR 5270220170 UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 4471 VALLEJO CA 94590 2363 EMERIC AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5302100317 PARAFINA LOLITA M 2025 HELLINGS AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2025 HELLINGS AVE 26/02 $ 1,175.39 $ 45.00 $ 1,220.39 202606 HR 5133840065 WALLER MARY M 6318 WOOSTER AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90056 4601 TAFT AVE 26/02 $ 602.64 $ 45.00 $ 647.64 202606 HR 5281900299 STEVENS JANICE J 2601 GAYNOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2601 GAYNOR AVE 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 5611910372 HOLDEN EZELL EST OF 1343 KELSEY ST RICHMOND CA 94801 1343 KELSEY ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4140410020 SESSIONS R F & GWENDOLYN 2919 MC KENZIE DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2919 MCKENZIE DR 26/02 $ 614.68 $ 45.00 $ 659.68 202606 HR 4142220070 HARVEY JACK I 3000 WISWALL DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3000 WISWALL DR 26/02 $ 614.60 $ 45.00 $ 659.60 202606 HR 4140310022 EASILEY CARL L JR 2934 GROOM DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2934 GROOM DR 26/02 $ 480.58 $ 45.00 $ 525.58 202606 HR 5130330128 HOOLF ORRIN & JOYCE 3200 OHIO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3200 OHIO AVE 26/02 $ 614.05 $ 45.00 $ 659.05 202606 HR 5154120074 WOOD JOHN C & TRACY L 131 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 131 29TH ST 26/02 $ 483.61 $ 45.00 $ 528.61 202606 HR 5240700053 LAM SANTOS HOO & CONNIE M TRE 4851 EL GRANDE PL EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 983 33RD ST 26/02 $ 325.01 $ 45.00 $ 370.01 202606 HR 5290900173 ROBINSON MARSHALL 1727 GAYNOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 1727 GAYNOR AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4311640249 LOPEZ ADELA 4588 FRAN WAY RICHMOND CA 94803 4588 FRAN WAY 26/02 $ 350.77 $ 45.00 $ 395.77 202606 HR 5192100195 SHAREEF INTISAR TRE 558 MCLAUGHLIN ST RICHMOND CA 94805 558 MCLAUGHLIN ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5130710048 CRUZ MARCOS LOPEZ 3721 OHIO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3721 OHIO AVE 25/11 $ 28.42 $ 45.00 $ 73.42 202606 HR 5611910364 MUSLIM MISSION CENTER 1321 KELSEY ST RICHMONDCA 94801 511 DUBOCE AVE 26/02 $ 1,226.86 $ 45.00 $ 1,271.86 202606 HR 5490910261 ALCARAZ BLANCA ESTELA 446 S 25TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 446 S 25TH ST 26/02 $ 613.80 $ 45.00 $ 658.80 202606 HR 5262900235 GRAY ERIN 2809 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2809 RHEEM AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4055500096 LEWIS RISHA L 3958 SELMI GRV RICHMOND CA 94806 3958 SELMI GRV 26/02 $ 509.26 $ 45.00 $ 554.26 202606 HR 4311230074 HORDE ANDREA R 2826 SHELDON DR RICHMOND CA 94803 2826 SHELDON DR 26/02 $ 417.91 $ 45.00 $ 462.91

Page 11 of 13 ends

Attachment 2 – Garbage Preliminary Lien List
Batch
Number
Lien Policy -
Levy Code
Parcel
Number Owner Billing Address City State Zip Site Street Address Service
Thru RSS Charge City Charge Total Due
202606 HR 5201000386 YOUNG CLARA JEAN TRE EST OF 704 COURTLAND AVE RICHMOND CA 94805 704 COURTLAND AVE 26/02 $ 418.39 $ 45.00 $ 463.39 202606 HR 4311550059 FITZGERALD TIMOTHY P 3012 DESERET DR RICHMOND CA 94803 3012 DESERET DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4140340185 GASTON GWENDOLYN TRE 6710 LION WAY UNIT 119 OAKLAND CA 94621 3008 GROOM DR 26/02 $ 391.25 $ 45.00 $ 436.25 202606 HR 5340320273 ATTAWAY IDA B 928 LINCOLN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 928 LINCOLN AVE 26/02 $ 536.59 $ 45.00 $ 581.59 202606 HR 4140220023 CHAVEZ JAIME 3044 GLYNIS DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3044 GLYNIS DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4263620124 RUFFIN BILLY D JR 1205 PARKWAY CT RICHMOND CA 94803 1205 PARKWAY CT 26/02 $ 1,195.85 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.85 202606 HR 5582710066 UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 4471 VALLEJO CA 94590 519 TEWKSBURY AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 4140950025 URIARTEAVILES JULIO ALFONSO 3004 MOYERS RD RICHMOND CA 94806 3004 MOYERS RD 26/02 $ 609.71 $ 45.00 $ 654.71 202606 HR 4263420988 NAKAMURA ALLEN TRE 2611 CENTRAL AVE ALAMEDA CA 94501 61 GREENVIEW LN 26/02 $ 425.58 $ 45.00 $ 470.58 202606 HR 5441910105 CERVANTES RAQUEL 2116 VIRGINIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2116 VIRGINIA AVE 26/02 $ 412.10 $ 45.00 $ 457.10 202606 HR 4263710248 MATTHEWS ERMA L TRE 1308 GREENWAY DR EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 1308 GREENWAY DR 26/02 $ 439.61 $ 45.00 $ 484.61 202606 HR 5260200257 LUCAS DIONICIA 3411 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3411 RHEEM AVE 26/02 $ 612.31 $ 45.00 $ 657.31 202606 HR 5291800117 ESPARZA MARIA 2213 BURBECK AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2213 BURBECK AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5606400132 PINEDA ROBERTO & ANA 1628 HOFFMAN BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 1628 HOFFMAN BLVD 26/02 $ 425.58 $ 45.00 $ 470.58 202606 HR 5440810058 LEE WILLIAM H 226 S 19TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 226 S 19TH ST 26/02 $ 602.65 $ 45.00 $ 647.65 202606 HR 5611920231 MEJIA MARLENE 405 SANFORD AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 411 SANFORD AVE 26/02 $ 631.94 $ 45.00 $ 676.94 202606 HR 5280900092 LEDEZMA ESTANISLAO 2379 LINCOLN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2379 LINCOLN AVE 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5170100027 GUTIERREZ MANUEL J & SANDRA 553 38TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 553 38TH ST 26/02 $ 613.73 $ 45.00 $ 658.73 202606 HR 5243000063 CONWAY RODNEY E 751 32ND ST RICHMOND CA 94804 751 32ND ST 26/02 $ 439.61 $ 45.00 $ 484.61 202606 HR 5192100013 CHEN SANDRA RUTH TRE 595 KEY BLVD RICHMOND CA 94805 595 KEY BLVD 26/02 $ 439.61 $ 45.00 $ 484.61 202606 HR 5260110084 BINGHAM COLLETTE 3421 TULARE AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3421 TULARE AVE 26/02 $ 707.39 $ 45.00 $ 752.39 202606 HR 4142210121 RODRIGUEZ JORGE 3011 WISWALL DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3011 WISWALL DR 26/02 $ 593.39 $ 45.00 $ 638.39 202606 HR 5154000193 GARCIA EMILIO & NATALIE 2719 CHANSLOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2719 CHANSLOR AVE 26/02 $ 1,181.30 $ 45.00 $ 1,226.30 202606 HR 5502010225 FUENTES JANIRA NICOLE 528 FLORIDA AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 528 FLORIDA AVE 26/02 $ 613.40 $ 45.00 $ 658.40 202606 HR 4056500368 KHOURCHECH NADIR TRE 1136 ARROWHEAD CT RICHMOND CA 94806 1136 ARROWHEAD CT 26/02 $ 602.64 $ 45.00 $ 647.64 202606 HR 5082220137 GUNAWARDANA ASHAN 1636 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 1636 CARLSON BLVD 26/02 $ 202.63 $ 45.00 $ 247.63 202606 HR 4056400155 SWITALSKI MICHAEL & WINNIE LAU 877 MEADOW VIEW DR RICHMOND CA 94806 877 MEADOW VIEW DR 25/11 $ 166.93 $ 45.00 $ 211.93 202606 HR 5081600024 MCDONALD RACHEL 1407 MONTEREY ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1407 MONTEREY ST 26/02 $ 569.09 $ 45.00 $ 614.09 202606 HR 5151300141 BASYE PAUL & JENNIFER 522 26TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 522 26TH ST 26/02 $ 619.09 $ 45.00 $ 664.09 202606 HR 4140940109 MAHARAJ ROSHILLA & SHIV 2944 MOYERS RD RICHMOND CA 94806 2944 MOYERS RD 26/02 $ 491.94 $ 45.00 $ 536.94 202606 HR 4263210330 TRAYLOR BARRY 1009 VIEW DR RICHMOND CA 94803 1009 VIEW DR 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5402700305 SINGH RAJESHWAR 5679 SUNSET CREEK CT PLEASANTON CA 94566 164 12TH ST 26/02 $ 619.37 $ 45.00 $ 664.37 202606 HR 5080510166 GREEN GEORJENA MCDANIEL 1338 MONTEREY ST RICHMOND CA 94804 1338 MONTEREY ST 26/02 $ 613.30 $ 45.00 $ 658.30 202606 HR 5161710180 TURN KAO LINH TRE 2910 NEVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2910 NEVIN AVE 26/02 $ 609.35 $ 45.00 $ 654.35 202606 HR 4141100174 LARREYNAGA JORGE A 2752 JO ANN DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2752 JO ANN DR 26/02 $ 1,187.81 $ 45.00 $ 1,232.81 202606 HR 5241000222 LYONS JO ANN 946 29TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 946 29TH ST 26/02 $ 613.45 $ 45.00 $ 658.45 202606 HR 5440420031 BATON TOMMIE 128 S 18TH ST RICHMONDCA 94804 128 S 18TH ST 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 4353100011 GARCIA MIGUEL 5497 ALLISON LN RICHMOND CA 94803 5497 ALLISON LN 26/02 $ 439.61 $ 45.00 $ 484.61 202606 HR 5091000165 MUELLER ALMA J 5720 MADISON AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5718 MADISON AVE 26/02 $ 613.04 $ 45.00 $ 658.04 202606 HR 5341520095 GOMEZ ASCENCION 645 13TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 645 13TH ST 26/02 $ 1,195.90 $ 45.00 $ 1,240.90 202606 HR 5440410065 CRUZ JUAN 122 S 17TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 122 S 17TH ST 26/02 $ 561.50 $ 45.00 $ 606.50 202606 HR 4311550141 OTTEN ANDREW & TINA 3070 DESERET DR RICHMOND CA 94803 3070 DESERET DR 26/02 $ 623.14 $ 45.00 $ 668.14 202606 HR 5380600139 OROZCO FERNANDO & CLAUDIA 433 4TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 433 4TH ST 26/02 $ 613.48 $ 45.00 $ 658.48 202606 HR 4141910135 MOSCOSO JOSE W FLORES 2704 WISWALL DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2704 WISWALL DR 26/02 $ 578.33 $ 45.00 $ 623.33 202606 HR 4080340054 GARIBAY LUIS A CAZARES 4205 JENKINS WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 4205 JENKINS WAY 26/02 $ 465.84 $ 45.00 $ 510.84 202606 HR 5153010177 RODRIGUEZ MILTON ERIC TRE 32309 CREST LN UNION CITY CA 94587 239 26TH ST 26/02 $ 425.58 $ 45.00 $ 470.58

Page 12 of 13 ends

Page 13 of 13 ends

Attachment 3 - Garbage Lien Resolution
DocID #72464v1
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA,

LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR UNPAID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE

CHARGES ON CERTAIN LANDS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the premises located in the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California, and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, were provided with waste collection service as required by RMC Chapter 9.20; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.20.110, and Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with section 5470, the owners of said premises were notified in writing of their requirement to subscribe to waste collection services and make payments as required by said code sections; and WHEREAS, said owners of the premises failed to make payments for waste collection services as required; and
WHEREAS, as a result thereof, the City of Richmond has incurred charges for delinquent waste collection charges and administrative costs, which amounts remain unpaid; and WHEREAS, said delinquent waste collection service charges and administrative costs are enumerated in Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 9.20.110 of the Municipal Code of the City of Richmond, the City Council of the City of Richmond does hereby lien and levy a special assessment against each premises, in the amounts as identified for each specific premise listed in the Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Exhibit A may be amended to delete any enumerated waste collection service charges and administrative costs paid before special assessments authorized hereby are forwarded to the County Recorder of Contra Costa County, California.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution, together with Exhibit A as may be amended, with the Office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County, California.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to deliver a copy of this resolution to the Director of Finance of the City of Richmond, and that the Director of Finance is authorized to cause the above amounts to be collected in the manner provided by law for collection of special assessments.
-------------------------
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond, California at a regular meeting thereof held June 16, 2026, by the following vote:
1787
Attachment 3 - Garbage Lien Resolution
DocID #72464v1
AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

Clerk of the City of Richmond
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
1788

Page 1 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
Human Resources
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Nickie Mastay, Deputy City Manager – Internal Services Sharrone Taylor, Director of Human Resources
Emily Combs, Director of Finance
Subject: Amendments to Position Control List
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed amendment results in annual savings of approximately $99,530.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City Council’s authorization is required to amend
staffing (position control list) and allocate funding as required.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution amending staffing and position control list and allocating the necessary salary, wages, and benefits as required – Human Resources
Department (Nickie Mastay/Sharrone Taylor/Emily
Combs 510-620-6602).

DISCUSSION:

City Council approval is required to amend the City's authorized staffing (i.e., position control). Human Resources is requesting the following amendments to position control:

AGENDA
REPORT
1789

Page 2 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Human Resources is seeking City Council approval to reallocate one (1) Network and Systems Specialist II to one (1) Jailer position in the Police Department. The Police Department is working diligently to ensure there is adequate coverage in the temporary holding facility. The temporary holding facility is a critical operational component that enables Richmond Police Department officers to efficiently process and book arrestees locally before transporting them to the Martinez Detention Facility. This process significantly reduces the amount of time patrol officers are out of service and unavailable to respond to calls within the City.

There are currently employees on long-term leave, which is affecting minimum staffing of the facility. The Police Chief reports that without timely backfilling of these positions once they become vacant, there is a substantial risk that the temporary holding facility may be forced to reduce operations or close intermittently due to insufficient staffing. If that occurs, patrol officers would once again be required to leave the City for extended booking trips to Martinez, negatively impacting response times, patrol visibility, and overall service delivery to the community.

The decision to reallocate the vacant Network and Systems Specialist II to Jailer is driven by this operational assessment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact is a savings of approximately $99,530:
*Estimate based on step 3
SUMMARY:

City staff recommend approval of the resolution amending the position control list and allocating funds, which will modify the position control list in the following manner:

Add the following position:

Classification Department Unit
Jailer Police SEIU Local 1021 – General
Employees
Estimated Fiscal Impact*
Classification Salary & Benefits
Add Jailer ~$136,402
Delete Network and Systems Specialist II ~$235,932
1790

Page 3 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
Delete the following position:

Classification Department Unit
Network and Systems Specialist II Police IFPTE Local 21 MidManagement DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution Amending Position Control
1791
RESOLUTION NO. _____

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE CITY’S POSITION CONTROL LIST
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article IV Section 1(b)(1) of the City Charter, the City Manager has the responsibility to manage all affairs of the City's operations, and appoint employees when necessary for the good service of the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Resolution No. 148-20, the City Manager has the authority to make appropriate administrative changes to the City’s position control list; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that certain amendments to the position control list are necessary to meet the operational needs of the City.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Richmond City Council authorizes the City Manager to modify the position control in order to meet the operational needs of the City; and amend the budget to allocate the necessary funds for salaries, wages, and benefits as required; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, effective June 16, 2026, the City’s position control is hereby revised to add the following positions:

Classification Department Unit
1 Jailer Police SEIU Local 1021
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, effective June 16, 2026, the City’s position control is hereby revised to delete the following positions:

Classification Department Unit
1 Network Systems Specialist II Police SEIU Local 1021
-----------
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:
1792
ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:
_____________________________

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
____________________
Mayor
Approved as to form:
____________________
City Attorney
1793

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Mayor's Office
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Martinez
Subject: Appointment of Courtney Bulletti to the Human Relations Commission
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Courtney Bulletti is applying to serve on the Human
Relations Commission.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPOINT Courtney Bulletti to the Human Relations Commission to a vacant seat with a new term ending
March 30, 2029 – Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo
Martinez 510-620-6503).

DISCUSSION:

Courtney Bulletti is a dedicated community leader with deep roots in Richmond and a strong commitment to serving the community she is proud to call home. With longstanding knowledge of the City and its residents, she is passionate about addressing community concerns and advocating for local voices. She has helped lead major events throughout Richmond and has been a strong advocate for her community.

AGENDA
REPORT
1794

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
For more than 16 years, she has served as the Chair Coordinator for Richmond’s Native American Pow-wow, demonstrating her leadership, cultural advocacy, and dedication to community engagement.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Courtney Bulletti’s redacted application 1795
1796

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Mayor's Office
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Martinez
Subject: Appointment of Sherwin Harris to the Macdonald Avenue Corridor Task Force
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Sherwin Harris is applying to serve on the Macdonald
Avenue Corridor Task Force.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPOINT Sherwin Harris to the Macdonald Avenue Corridor Task Force with the term that expires on
December 31, 2026 – Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo
Martinez 510-620-6503).

DISCUSSION:

Sherwin Harris is seeking appointment to the Macdonald Avenue Corridor Task Force.

He has worked in the City of Richmond for 32 years, stationed along Macdonald Avenue, and has been actively involved with the Richmond community, especially the Iron Triangle. Serving on this task force is important to Sherwin, as he hopes to help revitalize Macdonald Avenue. Sherwin holds a bachelor’s degree in Christian Ministry & Leadership and is also involved with the Richmond Chamber of Commerce, Iron Triangle Neighborhood Council, and the Homeless Task Force.

AGENDA
REPORT
1797

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Sherwin Harris’s redacted application
1798
1799

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Mayor's Office
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Martinez
Subject: Reappointment of Lorene Holmes Dees to the
Commission On Aging
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Lorene Holmes Dees is reapplying to serve on the
Commission On Aging.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: REAPPOINT Lorene Holmes Dees to the Commission On Aging to a vacant seat with a new term ending May
19, 2030 – Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510-
620-6503).

DISCUSSION:

Lorene Holmes Dess has served the commission since September 2024, to fill an unexpired term, and would like to continue to serve with a full term. She is seeking reappointment to the Richmond Commission on Aging to continue the work and projects she has been actively involved in over the past two years. She remains committed to serving the community and believes there is still important work ahead. Through her experience, compassion, and dedication, she hopes to continue advocating for older AGENDA
REPORT
1800

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
adults and ensuring that people in her age group feel valued, supported, and empowered.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Lorene Holmes Dees’s redacted application 1801
1802

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Mayor's Office
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Martinez
Subject: Appointment of Ysela Lopez to the Richmond Youth Council
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Ysela Lopez is applying to serve on the Richmond Youth
Council.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPOINT Ysela Lopez to the Richmond Youth Council to a vacant seat with a term ending December 31, 2027 –
Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510-620-6503).

DISCUSSION:

Ysela Lopez is recommended for appointment to the Richmond Youth Council. As a student, she has participated in several programs and organizations, including the Future Generations Project, Richmond Fire and Police Toy Program, and Richmond Fire Youth Academy. She has also volunteered for city street cleanups and the Richmond Tiny House Village Mural Project. Ysela has taken advanced courses such as Honors Chemistry, Honors Spanish 2, and Honors English 2. While involved with the Future Generations Project, she worked as an administrative assistant, maintaining AGENDA
REPORT
1803

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
digital and physical records, supporting team operations, and helping plan and set up community service events.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Ysela Lopez’s redacted application
1804
1805

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Mayor's Office
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Subject: Expansion of the Macdonald Avenue Corridor Task Force Membership Correction
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

September 23, 2025
May 19, 2026

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

At its April 28, 2026, meeting, the Macdonald Avenue
Corridor Task Force voted to recommend the addition of
five (5) new members: three (3) business
representatives, one (1) resident representative, and one (1) flexible seat for a property owner, business owner, or combination thereof. On May 19, 2026, the City Council
approved four (4) new seats. This item corrects that
action by adding one (1) additional seat and clarifying the intended seat types, bringing the total number of new
seats to five (5), consistent with the Task Force’s
recommendation.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE the correction to the May 19, 2026 Council action by adding one (1) additional seat to the Macdonald Avenue Corridor Task Force, for a total of five (5) new seats, consisting of three (3) business representatives, one (1) resident representative, and one (1) flexible seat designated for either a property owner, business owner, or a combination thereof, to be filled through the standard Boards and Commissions process — Mayor’s Office
(Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510-620-6502).

AGENDA
REPORT
1806

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
DISCUSSION:

The Macdonald Avenue Corridor Task Force was created to bring together stakeholders and decision-makers to identify priorities, coordinate revitalization efforts, and develop recommendations for the City Council regarding the future of the Macdonald Avenue Corridor.

At its April 28, 2026, meeting, the Task Force discussed its membership structure and voted to recommend adding five (5) new members. The recommendation was intended to broaden representation and ensure that the Task Force includes voices with a direct connection to the corridor.

The Task Force’s recommended five (5) new seats were:
 Three (3) business representatives;
 One (1) resident representative; and
 One (1) flexible seat, designated for either a property owner, business owner, or combination thereof.

On May 19, 2026, the City Council approved an item expanding the Task Force membership. However, the approved action added four (4) new seats rather than the five (5) seats recommended by the Task Force. In addition, the seat types approved in the May 19, 2026, action need to be clarified to reflect the Task Force’s original recommendation.

This item corrects the May 19, 2026, Council action in two ways. First, it adds one (1) additional seat, bringing the total number of new seats to five (5). Second, it clarifies that the five (5) new seats shall consist of three (3) business representatives, one (1) resident representative, and one (1) flexible seat for either a property owner, business owner, or combination thereof.

This correction will ensure that the Task Force membership accurately reflects the recommendation approved by the Task Force at its April 28, 2026 meeting. It will also support the Task Force’s next phase of work, including the development of bylaws, clarification of membership categories, and establishment of expectations for participation.

The five (5) new seats will be filled through the standard Boards and Commissions process. Applicants should live, own a business, own property, or otherwise demonstrate a clear connection to and stake in the Macdonald Avenue Corridor. All appointments will return to the City Council for confirmation, consistent with the procedures used for City boards, commissions, committees, and advisory bodies. 1807

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
Mayor's Office
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Councilmember Jamelia Brown
Subject: Proclamation Recognizing the First Friday in June as National Gun Violence Awareness Day
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

National Gun Violence Awareness Day is observed
annually on the first Friday in June to honor victims and survivors of gun violence and to raise awareness about
the impacts of gun violence on communities across the
country. The proposed proclamation recognizes June 5,
2026, as National Gun Violence Awareness Day in the
City of Richmond and encourages community awareness
and participation in related observances.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: PROCLAMATION recognizing the first Friday in June to be National Gun Violence Awareness Day – Mayor
Eduardo Martinez (510-620-6503)/Councilmember
Jamelia Brown (510-412-2050).

AGENDA
REPORT
1808

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 16, 2026
DISCUSSION:

National Gun Violence Awareness Day is recognized annually on the first Friday in June to honor the lives of victims and survivors of gun violence and to raise awareness about the impacts of gun violence on communities across the country. In 2026, National Gun Violence Awareness Day will be observed on June 5, followed by Wear Orange Weekend on June 6–7.

The Wear Orange movement began in honor of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old girl who was tragically killed by gun violence in 2013. The campaign was inspired by her friends, who chose the color orange to symbolize the value of human life and to promote awareness around gun violence prevention. Since then, communities, local governments, organizations, and residents across the United States have participated in Wear Orange activities and observances.

The City of Richmond recognizes the importance of community safety and acknowledges the impact gun violence has on individuals, families, and neighborhoods.

This proclamation provides an opportunity to recognize victims and survivors of gun violence, support community awareness efforts, and encourage residents to participate in National Gun Violence Awareness Day observances.

Issuing this proclamation aligns with ongoing efforts to promote public safety, community engagement, and violence prevention initiatives throughout the City of Richmond.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – 2026 Proclamation Declaring the First Friday in June to be National Gun Violence Awareness Day
1809
WHEREAS, every day, nearly 130 people in the United States are killed by gun violence and more than 200 are shot and wounded, with an average of more than 19,000 gun homicides every year; and
WHEREAS, people in the United States are 26 times more likely to die by gun homicide than people in other high-income countries; and WHEREAS, in California, there are thousands of gun-related deaths each year, with a significant social and economic impact on communities, including costs related to health care, law enforcement, and lost productivity; and WHEREAS, gun homicides and assaults are concentrated in cities, with more than half of all gun homicides in the nation occurring in 42 cities; and WHEREAS, cities across the nation, including Richmond, are working to reduce gun violence through evidence-based public safety and community-based prevention strategies; and
WHEREAS, protecting public safety in the communities they serve is mayors’ highest responsibility; and
WHEREAS, support for the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens goes hand-in-hand with keeping guns away from individuals who pose a risk to themselves or others; and
WHEREAS, mayors, councilmembers, law enforcement officers, and communitybased violence prevention organizations know their communities best and are uniquely positioned to respond to local conditions and support safety efforts; and WHEREAS, gun violence prevention remains critical as communities across the country continue to be impacted by its effects; and
2026 CITY PROCLAMATION

DECLARING THE FIRST FRIDAY IN JUNE TO BE NATIONAL

GUN VIOLENCE AWARENESS DAY
1810
WHEREAS, in January 2013, Hadiya Pendleton was tragically shot and killed at age 15; and on June 5, 2026, communities across the United States will recognize National Gun Violence Awareness Day to honor her memory and the lives of all victims of gun violence; and
WHEREAS, the Wear Orange movement was inspired by friends of Hadiya Pendleton, who asked others to wear orange to honor her life and symbolize the value of human life; and
WHEREAS, anyone can participate in this national observance by wearing orange on June 5, 2026, the first Friday in June, to raise awareness about gun violence and its impacts; and
WHEREAS, by wearing orange on June 5, 2026, individuals across the United States will honor survivors and victims of gun violence and support efforts to prevent future tragedies; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond renews its commitment to reducing gun violence and supporting efforts to keep firearms out of the hands of individuals who should not have access to them while encouraging responsible gun ownership to help keep communities safe.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Mayor Eduardo Martinez of the City of Richmond declares June 5, 2026, the first Friday in June, to be National Gun Violence Awareness Day in the City of Richmond, California, and encourages all residents to support efforts to prevent gun violence and honor the lives impacted by it.
___________________________ ______________________________ Mayor Eduardo Martinez Jamelia Brown
City of Richmond Councilmember District 1
June 16, 2026

1811

Page 1 of 1 ends

June 16, 2026
Police Department
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Tim Simmons, Chief of Police
Subject: Monthly Crime Report for April 2026
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for receiving this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff is requesting that the City Council receive the Police Department monthly Crime Report for April 2026.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE the monthly Crime Report from the Richmond Police Department for April 2026 – Police Department
(Chief Tim Simmons 510-621-1802).

DISCUSSION:

The Police Department's April 2026 report includes statistical data regarding violent crimes, property crimes, calls for service, parking enforcement activities, and significant incidents occurring during the reporting period.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Monthly Crime Report, April 2026
AGENDA
REPORT
1812
Richmond Police Department
Crime Report
Council Report April 2026
Mayor Martinez, City Council, and Community:

The Richmond Police Department's(RPD) crime statistics for April 2026 show a decrease in both violent and property crime totals compared to March 2026.

Violent Crime
In the month of April, there has been an increase in the number of homicides, from zero to 2. Aggravated assaults decreased by 37 percent (%), from 83 to 52 incidents. There was a 30 percent decrease in the number of robberies, from 23 to 16 incidents. Sexual assaults have decreased by 20 percent, from 15 to 12 incidents. Overall, the total number of violent crimes decreased by 32 percent, from 121 to 82 incidents.

Property Crime
There was a slight decrease in burglaries (excluding auto burglaries), by 27 percent from 33 to 24 incidents. Thefts, including auto burglaries, decreased by 54 percent, from 272 to 125 incidents. Vehicle thefts decreased by 11 percent, from 110 to 98 incidents.

Arson remained unchanged, with 5 incidents. Overall, the total number of property crimes decreased by 40 percent, from 420 to 252 incidents. *Reports submitted online in February and March were imported into our records management system in the month of March, contributing to a notable increase in theft related offenses for the month of March and does not necessarily reflect an increase in actual criminal activity.

Reports / Calls for Service
There was an 8 percent decrease in vehicle impounds, from 262 to 242. Collisionrelated calls for service decreased by 21 percent, from 182 to 144 incidents. DUI-related traffic collisions decreased 17 percent, from 6 to 5 incidents. DUI reports decreased by 33 percent, from 42 to 28 incidents. Sideshow-related calls for service increased from 0 to 1 incident. The total number of firearms recovered decreased by 4 percent, from 23 to 22.

Parking Enforcement
The Parking Enforcement Unit towed 125 vehicles for being abandoned, overparked, or having expired registration, up from 111 in March, a 13 percent increase. They issued 5,239 parking citations, compared to 5,474 in March, a 4 percent decrease. The Parking Unit responded to 365 citizen complaints regarding abandoned vehicles, compared to 314 in March. In April, 214 of these vehicles were cited or tagged with 72-hour notices, and 90 vehicles were eventually towed.
1813
Traffic Enforcement
Officers issued approximately 102 misdemeanor and infraction traffic-related citations.

The number of citations reported for this month-long period may be lower than the actual number issued. This is due to processing and data-entry timelines, as citations are not always immediately entered into the system. Accordingly, the figures provided should be considered an estimate.

Illegal Dumping Citations
Three citations were issued for Richmond Municipal Code (RMC) Illegal Dumping violations.

Tobacco Enforcement Citations
Richmond PD, Code Enforcement, Planning, and Richmond Fire conducted two tobacco inspections, resulting in the seizure of contraband and citations at both locations for RMC and Health and Safety Code violations.

Staffing
The month of April brought a reallocation of personnel as patrol staffing continues to improve. RPD assigned a detective to the Contra Costa County Major Crimes Task Force and a detective to the General Crimes Unit with primary responsibilities supporting Code Enforcement's Flavored Tobacco Enforcement Operations. The Special Victims Unit received an additional detective, and a weekend swing shift patrol team was established with one supervisor and four patrol officers. The RPD continues to work toward bolstering patrol numbers and restoring the Community Violence Reduction Team, Bravo Unit, Traffic Unit, and other specialty assignments.

Authorized sworn positions: 147
Current sworn staff: 129 (including nine trainees in the academy) Authorized full-time professional staff: 71
Current professional staff: 58
Council District Statistics
 District 1 experienced a 21% decrease in total calls for service, from 1,633 to 1,283  District 2 experienced a 7% decrease in total calls for service, from 1,304 to 1,208  District 3 experienced a 6% decrease in total calls for service, from 1,687 to 1,578  District 4 experienced a 10% decrease in total calls for service, from 695 to 627  District 5 experienced a 5% decrease in total calls for service, from 1,445 to 1,367  District 6 experienced a 13% decrease in total calls for service, from 1,171 to 1,016 These statistics offer a snapshot of crime trends in Richmond for April 2026, highlighting areas of concern and notable improvements. Additional statistical data and historical data can be found on our website under the Crime Analysis page. 1814
https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/1023/Crime-Analysis
Police District Summary
Central District Crime and Community Issues
At the intersection of 22nd Street and Carlson Boulevard, unhoused individuals have established a persistent encampment in a multi-jurisdictional area shared by Pacific Railroad, BNSF, BART, Amtrak, and RPD. Despite multiple abatement efforts, the encampment has continued to return, presenting an ongoing challenge that requires a multi-agency response.

A small encampment was recently discovered beneath the Castro underpass at Richmond Parkway and Hensley. Safe Organized Spaces (SOS) and Coordinated Outreach Referral Engagement (CORE) have been notified and are engaged.

Parking Enforcement continues to conduct time-restriction enforcement on 23rd Street, with an emphasis on weekend operations. Officers are also supporting 4Leaf's weekend vendor enforcement activities by addressing parking violations where carts, grills, and vehicles obstruct sidewalks, bus stops, and intersections. Saint Cornelius Church has been identified as a recurring area of concern, particularly on Sundays.

The 23rd Street Merchants Association has formally requested increased patrol presence during morning school hours to ensure the safety of children traveling through the area. This request follows a recent attempted kidnapping and assault.

Northern District Crime and Community Issues
Officers have been conducting high visibility patrols to deter prostitution activity in the area of 23rd and 24th Streets. Coordinated use of the Drone as First Responder (DFR) program has assisted patrol officers in locating offenders and gathering evidence, resulting in multiple arrests of both prostitutes and “johns”. Northern District sergeants also coordinated with Code Enforcement, CORE, SOS, Reach Out with Compassion and Kindness (ROCK), and Target management to clear recreational vehicles (RV) and unhoused individuals from the Target parking lot.

Northern District Sergeants addressed crime and blight at the West Ridge Apartments by coordinating with apartment management, Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office, ROCK, and Crime Prevention to address squatters and trespassers responsible for a significant portion of criminal activity and deteriorating conditions at the complex.

Through these combined efforts, officers arrested several subjects and recovered firearms, while management was able to remediate problem units that had been taken over by squatters. As a result, the number of vacant units at the complex dropped from over 100 to approximately 30 within the past two months.

Northern District Sergeants coordinated with RPD Traffic units to address resident complaints of speeding vehicles in the Carriage Hills area. 1815
Southern District Crime and Community Issues
Officers met with Home Depot management, security, and City Code Enforcement to address illegal dumping and loitering in the parking lot. A coordinated response plan is being developed, and the department is working to install a police substation trailer on site to deter future criminal activity.

Officers continued to engage with the unhoused population in the Southern District, coordinating with ROCK and CORE to offer services along Meade and Hall Streets.

Additional Significant Incidents from April 2026:

April 4, 2026 Booker T Anderson Community Event
The annual Easter Egg Hunt was held at Booker T. Anderson Park. Families and friends gathered to participate in a fun-filled event that included searching for the golden egg, enjoying lunch, and taking pictures with the Easter Bunny.

April 16, 2026 2400 block of Aberdeen Homicide
Officers responded to a report of shots fired inside a building with a subject down. Upon arrival, officers located one victim deceased in the stairwell from an apparent gunshot wound. A trail of blood led officers to a nearby apartment with an open front door. A protective sweep of the apartment revealed no occupants, but officers observed blood and shell casings inside. Shortly after, a subject arrived at a local hospital emergency room with a gunshot wound to the chest. The investigation revealed a mutual combat incident.

April 17, 2026 5400 block of Clinton Homicide
Officers responded to a welfare check at a residential address after a reporting party received a delayed-delivery email suggesting that two occupants were in danger. Upon arrival, officers utilized an unmanned aerial system to clear the interior prior to entry.

Inside, officers located two occupants, one deceased from an apparent self-inflicted hanging, and one deceased from apparent homicide. The incident was determined to be a murder-suicide.

April 17, 2026 Human Trafficking Operation
The Special Victims Unit conducted a human trafficking operation that resulted in three adult women and one minor being safely recovered. One suspect was arrested, and detectives developed additional leads on other potential suspects.

April 18, 2026 3200 block of McBryde K9 Assist and Gun Arrest Officers responded to a hit-and-run collision involving two parked vehicles. Witnesses reported observing the suspect walking away from the area before briefly returning to the scene. Officers conducted a pat-down search of the suspect based on his behavior and located a loaded firearm magazine in his possession. Based on witness observations, a search of the surrounding area was requested to determine whether any additional evidence had been discarded.

Officers and a K9 team searched the area and located a firearm in the vicinity where the suspect had been seen walking. Video surveillance footage of the area was also 1816
obtained. The loaded magazine matched the recovered firearm. The suspect was arrested, transported to a local hospital for medical clearance, and later booked into the Richmond Police Department jail.

April 19, 2026 400 block of 21st St. Drug and Gun Arrest Officers responded to a disturbance call. Upon arrival, officers contacted the victim, who reported that his former roommate drove up to him and began arguing. During the confrontation, the suspect threatened to shoot him and his family while brandishing a firearm. She also threatened to burn down his residence. The suspect fled the scene before officers arrived.

Officers later observed the suspect vehicle near 24th Street and Macdonald Avenue and conducted a traffic enforcement stop. The suspect complied and was taken into custody without incident. A search of the vehicle revealed a loaded 9mm pistol in the center console. A search of the suspect’s purse revealed a white substance suspected to be powder cocaine. An in-field identification was conducted, and the victim positively identified the suspect. The suspect was booked into the Martinez Detention Facility.

April 23, 2026 Bayview / Carlson Multiple Firearm Recoveries/Arrests Officers conducted a traffic enforcement stop for vehicle code violations. During the stop, one officer recognized a suspect in the vehicle from prior contacts, during which the individual had admitted to being habitually armed. The vehicle was slow to yield, and officers observed all occupants making furtive movements until the vehicle came to a stop.

Officers developed probable cause, removed the occupants, and searched the vehicle.

The search yielded three semi-automatic pistols equipped with auto-conversion devices, one additional semi-automatic pistol reported stolen from a neighboring jurisdiction, and numerous extended capacity magazines.

The juvenile suspect was booked at the juvenile detention facility, and the three adult suspects were booked at the county detention facility.

April 25, 2026 Special Event
Police personnel conducted the prescription take back program at the Iron Triangle Substation. Approximately 20 pounds of unwanted or expired medications were collected and marked for destruction.

Tim Simmons
Chief of Police
Richmond Police Department
1817

Page 1 of 4 ends

June 16, 2026
Public Works
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tawfic Halaby, Deputy Director of Public Works
Bradley Harms, Environmental Manager
Subject: Joint Powers Agreement for Participation in the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Initial fiscal impacts associated with participation in the Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System are
expected to be minimal and limited to staff time and
administrative support. Any future project-specific costs associated with use of the RAC System would be funded
through existing project budgets or applicable enterprise funds. The RAC System is intended to be financially
supported over time through compliance unit transactions and associated operations and maintenance fees. This
action has no immediate impact on the General Fund.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Public Works Department is requesting City Council
approval of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to allow the City to participate in the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System and provide an
additional compliance pathway for Municipal Regional
Permit (MRP) Provision C.3 stormwater treatment
requirements.

AGENDA
REPORT
1818

Page 2 of 4 ends

June 16, 2026
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to APPROVE a Joint Powers Agreement for participation in the Contra Costa County
Regional Alternative Compliance System, which provides
an off-site stormwater treatment compliance option for
projects that cannot feasibly meet on-site stormwater
treatment requirements; and AUTHORIZE the City
Manager, or their designee, to execute the agreement
and any related documents necessary to implement the
program – Public Works Department (Bradley Harms
510-307-8094).

DISCUSSION:

The City of Richmond is subject to stormwater management requirements under the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit. This permit is issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and applies to municipalities in the Bay Area, including the City of Richmond. The permit regulates stormwater runoff from municipal storm drain systems to help reduce pollutants entering local creeks, waterways, and San Francisco Bay.

Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit applies to certain new development and redevelopment projects. It requires eligible projects to incorporate stormwater treatment measures, such as low impact development and green stormwater infrastructure, to treat runoff before it enters the storm drain system. These requirements are intended to reduce pollution, improve water quality, and support compliance with state and federal clean water regulations.

Many projects can meet these requirements by installing stormwater treatment features on-site, such as bioretention areas, flow-through planters, pervious pavement, or other green infrastructure. However, some projects face physical, site, or operational constraints that make full on-site treatment infeasible or cost-prohibitive. Examples may include limited parcel size, existing utilities, soil conditions, access constraints, or other development limitations.

The Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System was developed to provide an additional compliance option in these circumstances. Instead of requiring all stormwater treatment to occur on the project site, the Regional Alternative Compliance System allows eligible projects to meet stormwater treatment obligations through approved off-site green stormwater infrastructure projects.

Under this system, approved off-site green stormwater infrastructure projects generate “compliance units.” Compliance units function like stormwater treatment credits. A developer or public agency with a project that cannot feasibly meet all required stormwater treatment on-site may purchase compliance units from an approved off-site project. The revenue from those purchases helps fund construction, operation, and 1819

Page 3 of 4 ends

June 16, 2026
maintenance of regional stormwater improvements that provide equivalent or greater water quality benefits.

The proposed Joint Powers Agreement establishes the governance structure needed to administer the Regional Alternative Compliance System. This includes program oversight, financial management, coordination among participating agencies, and the framework for generating, tracking, and using compliance units. There are currently 13 participating agencies including Antioch, Concord, Contra Costa County, Hercules, Martinez, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, San Palbo, and Richmond should Council approve this item. The Joint Powers Authority Board will include members of these agencies who will administer the program through an appointed manager.

Participation in the Regional Alternative Compliance System would not eliminate the City’s existing stormwater requirements. It would provide an additional compliance option for projects where on-site stormwater treatment is infeasible or cost-prohibitive. If the City participates, Richmond may allow eligible projects to use approved off-site compliance units when appropriate. If the City does not participate, projects in Richmond would continue to rely on traditional on-site compliance approaches.

The Regional Alternative Compliance System may also allow stormwater treatment improvements to be located where they provide greater regional water quality benefit. In some cases, off-site green stormwater infrastructure may be more cost-effective or environmentally beneficial than small, constrained on-site treatment facilities. This approach also allows stormwater infrastructure planning to occur on a broader regional basis rather than project by project.

Because the program requires a shared governance and financing structure, participating agencies must enter into the Joint Powers Agreement before the system can be fully implemented. Administrative costs are expected to be shared among participating agencies, and the program is intended to become supported over time through compliance unit transactions and associated operations and maintenance funding. The Joint Powers Authority Board has anticipated a budget of approximately $30,000 to cover a manager, bookkeeper, auditor and technical consultant; the share per jurisdiction is anticipated to be no more than $3,000 per year. In addition, each jurisdiction will be responsible for the investment of the tracking and administration of projects at a projected cost of no more than $10,000 per year.

City staff recommend approval of the Joint Powers Agreement because participation would give Richmond a flexible, legally structured option for meeting stormwater treatment requirements when on-site compliance is not feasible. The program would support regulatory compliance, provide additional tools for development and public infrastructure projects, and allow the City to participate in a regional approach to green stormwater infrastructure implementation
1820

Page 4 of 4 ends

June 16, 2026
SYNERGISTIC POLICIES:

Participation in the Contra Costa County RAC System provides the City with an additional compliance pathway for meeting MRP Provision C.3 requirements while maintaining flexibility in its application. Execution of the Joint Powers Agreement enables access to the program and establishes the governance structure necessary for its implementation.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Contra Costa County RAC System Fact Sheet Attachment 2 – Contra Costa County RAC System Overview
Attachment 3 – Resolution
Attachment 4 – Draft Joint Powers Agreement
1821
Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System Joint Powers Authority

FACT SHEET
This Fact Sheet was prepared to offer supporting information on the joint powers authority (JPA) proposed to be established to administer the Contra Costa County RAC System.

Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) and its Benefits
The RAC System is a program designed to offer a flexible, cost-effective, and scientifically defensible compliance option for the MRP’s development provisions requiring post-construction stormwater treatment. This System allows regulated developments to purchase “compliance units” in green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) treatment facilities or “Off-Site GSI Projects” constructed elsewhere within the County.

The developers of the Off-Site GSI Projects generate the “compliance units” that can be exchanged through the RAC System and purchased by the regulated developments that cannot treat stormwater on their own sites.

Why is the RAC System important? The RAC System provides an opportunity for strategic development, siting, and funding of larger regional stormwater treatment facilities in areas with greater legacy pollutant concerns. It can facilitate the funding and maintenance of Off-Site GSI Projects that offer multi-benefits, such as traffic calming, pedestrian safety enhancements, and urban greening to disadvantaged communities while removing toxic pollutants from the local waterways.

How does the RAC System work? Compliance units can be sold to an interested party (i.e., a developer or municipality) in need of off-site stormwater treatment in order to comply with the MRP’s treatment requirements for their own development. Here is how it works:

1. A “seller” would design and construct the Off-Site GSI Projects that generate RAC System compliance units. Off-Site GSI Projects require certification through the RAC System before selling compliance units. As described below, Sellers can be a variety of public agencies and private entities.

2. A “buyer” would pay for the RAC compliance units to satisfy their project’s stormwater compliance needs by completing a “compliance purchase.”

3. Buyers would pay an additional annual fee to cover the ongoing operations and maintenance (O&M) of the Off-Site GSI Projects that generate compliance units. 1822
Frequently Asked Questions
Q.1 What are the reasons for considering joining the Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System Joint Powers Authority (JPA) now, rather than later? Regional collaboration through the JPA could save costs and improve efficiency in meeting regulatory requirements. Joining the RAC JPA now, as it is being formed, can provide several benefits:
● It is more cost-effective to join the JPA initially as the setup and outreach costs can be spread among original participants, especially if more permittees now decide to join the JPA.
● Becoming a member of the JPA allows the agency’s boundaries to be included in the RAC CFD for future annexation.
● JPA members will benefit immediately from regional collaboration, shared resources, and access to the RAC System for purchasing and selling compliance units. ● Becoming a JPA member allows an agency to participate in the RAC System, which can benefit future City public projects or interested developers. ● Only JPA members will have access to the RAC System Community Facilities District (CFD), a mechanism for collecting annual fees for maintenance of Off-Site Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Projects.

Q.2 Is it relatively easy to join the JPA at a later date? What is the process of joining? Are there any advantages or disadvantages? Joining the JPA at a later date is possible. A new member agency would be required to approve and agree to be bound by the terms of the JPA agreement, and the JPA's board of directors would need to approve the new member. Advantages of joining later include flexibility in timing. In contrast, disadvantages may include missing out on being able to weigh in on the JPA’s formation, purpose, and other terms of the agreement, as well as potentially higher costs for late entry.

Q.3 Can we opt out of the CFD if my agency joins the RAC System JPA? JPA members are not obligated to participate in the CFD if they don’t want their City Council to approve it immediately. However, this would mean that the member would not be able to use the RAC System for developers within their jurisdiction, as the CFD is the mechanism developers must use for ongoing maintenance payments for compliance.

Q.4 What is the process of participating in the CFD at a later date to allow for annexing parcels within my jurisdiction at that time? The method of annexing parcels within your jurisdiction at a later date involves submitting a formal request to the JPA and following the established procedures for annexation. This may include approval by the JPA's board and execution of the necessary agreement, along with approval by the JPA member’s City Council.

Q.5 Can you explain the minimum administrative costs for agencies that join the RAC JPA and form the CFD versus those who join the RAC JPA but opt out of the CFD? Agencies that join the RAC JPA and form the CFD may incur administrative costs due to the additional responsibilities of managing the CFD. These additional costs are anticipated to be low and could be covered by parcels in your jurisdiction participating in the RAC System. Those who opt out of the CFD will only be responsible for the JPA’s administrative costs but may miss out on the benefits of the CFD, such as the ability to 1823
levy special taxes on developers who would like to use the RAC System for their compliance.

Q.6 My agency is interested in using the RAC System to facilitate ‘internal exchanges’ within my jurisdiction. We anticipate having compliance units available to sell but are interested in selling them only to private buyers within my jurisdiction. Can you explain if such internal exchanges are possible and how it works? Internal exchanges within your jurisdiction could be possible through the RAC System. If your jurisdiction would like to “reserve” compliance units, we could incorporate a field into the RAC System Tracking Tool that would make those compliance units unavailable to entities outside your jurisdiction. However, it is encouraged that any compliance unit “reservation” lapse after a certain period of time, because the compliance units will not generate maintenance fees for the Off-Site GSI Project until they are sold. If compliance units remain unsold, the seller (i.e., your jurisdiction) must pay maintenance costs until they are sold.

Q.7 How are the ongoing costs calculated as part of the ongoing CFD fees to collect? Ongoing costs as part of the CFD fees are calculated based on the maintenance, repair, and replacement activities required for the facilities funded by the CFD. These costs are typically included in the special taxes levied on properties within the CFD.

Q.8 What steps are involved in forming a JPA and establishing a CFD? The steps involved in forming a JPA and establishing a CFD include drafting and approving the joint powers agreement, obtaining approval from the governing boards of the participating agencies, and executing the agreement. The CFD process includes adopting resolutions of intention, holding public hearings, and conducting elections to approve the special taxes.

Q.9 What happens when a parcel changes ownership from one permittee to another? For example, when does a county parcel become a city annexation? If we establish a future annexation area that includes the entire county, if a property moves from the County to a City as a result of incorporation or annexation, it is still within the boundaries of the future annexation area, so it could annex into the CFD as if it had never moved out of the County.

Q.10 How would the JPA provide opportunities for participation by agencies outside of the County? A JPA is an agreement among various public agencies. The members don't have to be limited to a single county. The JPA structure gives them the power to exercise powers that are common to them, plus other statutory powers given to them. So, it is possible that a JPA that initially includes only the County could grow to include public agencies outside the boundaries of the County, including State agencies such as Caltrans. If the JPA agreement is amended to include members outside the County, the CFD could similarly be amended to add the new public agency/ies jurisdiction to the future annexation area. However, as a reminder, public agencies purchasing compliance units would pay for maintenance through a separate agreement outside of the CFD, which is reserved for private parcel owners only.

Q.11 If one jurisdiction (e.g., unincorporated Contra Costa County) builds a project that is in a separate incorporated city, but that incorporated city did not join the JPA and CFD, could we still use that project as part of the RAC System? The project itself can be located anywhere the RAC System allows facilities to be located (defined as the entire County, providing that the property owner has approved of the project). However, the entities 1824
purchasing compliance units generated by that project can only be located within jurisdictions participating in the RAC System.

Q.12 If a jurisdiction doesn’t plan to buy or sell any compliance units (i.e., has decided to be a member of the JPA just so that they have that option), will they have an ongoing cost associated with being a member? Most likely, yes. The JPA Board would determine that cost burden on an annual basis. The cost to be a member that's not participating in any improvements would probably be limited to just the administrative staff of maintaining the JPA.

Q.13 If my jurisdiction has several developers participating in the RAC System, will my administrative costs for the JPA and CFD be progressively higher with each participating developer? The overall costs for the JPA and CFD would be progressively higher for a jurisdiction that has several developers participating. However, those additional administrative costs should ideally be passed on to the developers so that the additional cost burden by the jurisdiction is minimal.

Q.14 Can a JPA administer multiple CFDs within different jurisdictions? Yes, a JPA can administer multiple CFDs within different jurisdictions, allowing for coordinated management and efficient use of resources across various areas.

Q.15 How can municipalities benefit from regional collaboration through a JPA? Municipalities can benefit from regional collaboration through a JPA by sharing resources, expertise, and costs. This can lead to improved efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced ability to meet regulatory requirements and achieve common goals. Because each permittee is liable to meet the Mercury and PCBs TMDL (C.11.c and C.12.c of the MRP), they can be achieved through participation and funding of regional projects funded and maintained by the RAC System. Permittees that are not members of the RAC System will have to find alternate means to comply with these two provisions. 1825
Contra Costa County Regional Alternative
Compliance System Overview
Rinta Perkins, CCCWP Interim Program Manager
City of Richmond City Council
DRAFT
1826
Introduction
DRAFT
1827
What Are the Challenges with the Existing System?
• The Municipal Regional
Stormwater Permit (MRP)
requires low impact
development (LID)/green
stormwater infrastructure
(GSI) to be implemented:
– On new development and
redevelopment projects (C.3.b)
– To retrofit a proportion of
permittee impervious surfaces
(C.3.j)
– To address PCBs/mercury
TMDLs in San Francisco Bay
(C.11/C.12)
DRAFT
1828
What Are the Challenges with the Existing System?
Challenges:
• Some development sites have
physical or site use constraints
to implement GSI
• Distributed GSI is costly and
requires considerable effort to
maintain
• PCBs/mercury pollution is
concentrated in certain areas
of Contra Costa County Contra Costa County PCBs Load Distribution 1829
How can Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) address these challenges?
• The RAC System allows an off-site option for new and
redevelopment projects to meet MRP C.3 requirements
– Other regulated stormwater dischargers may also participate (e.g., Caltrans)
• The RAC System allows for investment in regional GSI projects that:
– Are less expensive to implement and maintain per acre treated – Can be located to target old industrial areas
– Could provide multiple benefits
AND
• The RAC System establishes designated O&M funding to
ensure long-term performance of facilities
1830
What is the Legal Basis for Alternative Compliance?
• Alternative compliance systems
are legally enabled through
existing rules, guidance, and plans
• Contra Costa County (CCC) RAC
System was developed in input
from:
– CCC Permittees
– Advisory Committee made from nine
SF Bay Area Counties + Caltrans +
Port of Oakland
– Water Quality Control Board and
EPA
– Internal and external Legal
Reviewers
1831
RAC System
Overview
1832
Contra Costa County RAC System
1833
RAC Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and Community Facilities District (CFD)
R A C J o i n t P o w e r s
A g r e e m e n t
I n i t i a l M e m b e r s
Permittee 1
Permittee 3
Permittee 2
Permittee 4
Permittee 5 Permittee 6
CIP Projects
Non-Profits
R A C S y s t e m P a r t i c i p a t i o n
S e l l e r s & B u y e r s

1. Form
Community
Facilities District

2. RAC Administration
Private Developers
Functions of JPA
1834
RAC System
Implementation
Process
1835
RAC Joint Power Authority (JPA)
• JPA Formation and Independence
o A legally separate entity formed with its own liabilities, independent from agency members.
• Term Sheet and Membership
o Outlines JPA powers; how new members are admitted, and legislative body approval.
• Operational Structure and Staffing
o Contract manager instead of hiring employees (avoid pension liabilities and increase flexibility).
• Financial Responsibilities
o Limited to the JPA and shared administrative expenses among members.
1836
RAC Community Facilities District
CFD formed with initial taxable property only
and multi-jurisdiction “future annexation area”
Properties annex into the CFD as
they to opt to participate in RAC
System
CFD formation requires three
meetings of JPA governing board
JPA authorizes the CFD to levy special taxes to finance the acquisition, improvement, rehabilitation, and maintenance of stormwater infrastructure
1837
RAC Community Facilities District (Continued)
• Annexing property owner executes “unanimous
approval” (voting in favor of special taxes etc.)
• JPA legislative body may confirm annexations by
resolution
Annexation of Parcels into the
CFD from Future Annexation Area
• Resolution of intention to add territory
• Public hearing and resolution determining addition
of territory to future annexation area
When new public agencies join
the JPA, the JPA legislative body
may add new members’ territory
to the “future annexation area”
1838
Next Steps for
Implementation
1839
Implementation Steps and Timeline
1840
Next Steps
• Sixteen agencies expressed interests in the RAC JPA
• Final JPA Agreement based on City/Town/County
attorneys’ comments
• Participate in RAC JPA coordination meetings and
operational discussions
• Adoption of resolution and approval of JPA agreement by the agency’s governing body
1841
Contact
Rinta Perkins
Interim Program Manager
[email protected]
(925) 313-2392
1842
Thank You!
1843
Reso. No. XX-26

Page 1 of 2 ends

DocID #69961v1DocID #69961v1
Formatted: Font: 8 pt
RESOLUTION NO. XX-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JOINT

POWERS AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

REGIONAL ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE (RAC) SYSTEM

WHEREAS, the City of Richmond is subject to stormwater regulatory requirements under the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP), including Provision C.3 requiring implementation of low impact development and green stormwater infrastructure; and WHEREAS, certain development and municipal projects may face constraints that limit the feasibility of on-site stormwater treatment; and
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System provides an alternative compliance pathway through the use of off-site green stormwater infrastructure projects that generate compliance units; and WHEREAS, the RAC System has been developed in coordination with participating jurisdictions, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board; and
WHEREAS, participation in the RAC System does not obligate the City to utilize the program for any specific project; and
WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement establishes the governance structure necessary to administer the RAC System; and
WHEREAS, initial participation is expected to have limited fiscal impact, with longterm program funding supported through compliance transactions and associated fees.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richmond as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporates them herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) for participation in the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney; furthermore, the City Attorney is authorized to negotiate and approve such revisions, insertions, and deletions to the Agreement as the City Attorney deems necessary or appropriate to carry out the intent of the Council, prior to execution by the City Manager.

SECTION 3. The City Manager is further authorized to execute any related documents necessary to carry out the intent of this Resolution.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. 1844
Reso. No. XX-26

Page 2 of 2 ends

DocID #69961v1DocID #69961v1
Formatted: Font: 8 pt
*********************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held May 26, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

PAMELA CHRISTIAN

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
1845
-1-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc

JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
Between Participating Cities, Contra Costa County, and the Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District to Establish the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance Joint Powers Authority for
Implementation of the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System This Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) dated July 1, 2026, is made and entered into pursuant to the provisions of Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, Article 1 (Section 6500 et seq.) of the California Government Code relating to the joint exercise of powers among [INSERT FINAL LIST OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES] (collectively, “Member Agencies” and each, individually, a “Member Agency”). The term “Member Agencies” shall also include a public agency added to this Agreement in accordance with Section 14.

RECITALS
A. The joint powers authority (“JPA”) formed pursuant to this Agreement to administer the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (“RAC”) System is authorized to (i) establish a community facilities district pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (“Mello-Roos Act”) in order to finance on-going maintenance costs for “Off-Site GSI Projects” constructed pursuant to the RAC System, and (ii) take other actions in furtherance of the RAC System.

B. The RAC System is a program designed to offer a flexible, cost-effective, and scientifically defensible compliance option for the Municipal Regional Permit’s development provisions requiring post-construction stormwater treatment. The Municipal Regional Permit is a Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Permit No. CAS612008.

C. The RAC System allows the owners of regulated developments and certain public agencies (buyers) to purchase “compliance units” in green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) treatment facilities or “Off-Site GSI Projects” constructed elsewhere within the County.

D. The developers of the Off-Site GSI Projects, which may be public agencies or private entities, generate the “compliance units” that can be exchanged through the RAC System and purchased by the buyers (owners of the regulated developments and public agencies that cannot treat stormwater on their own sites). Private buyers will contribute to the cost of operating and maintaining the Off-Site GSI Projects by annexing their development sites into the proposed community facilities district formed by the JPA. Public agencies that are buyers will pay fees directly to the JPA as an alternative funding mechanism because such public agencies cannot be levied a special tax under the proposed community facilities district.
1846
-2-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions hereinafter set forth, it is agreed by and among the Member Agencies as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS
Capitalized terms used in the Agreement shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context requires otherwise.

1.1 “Act” means the Joint Exercise of Powers Act of the State of California (Government Code Section 6500 et seq.).

1.2 “Agreement” means this Joint Powers Agreement.

1.3 “Board” means the Board of Directors for the Joint Powers Authority.

1.4 “Effective Date” means the date on which this Agreement shall become effective and the JPA shall exist as a separate public agency, as further described in Section 5.

1.5 “JPA” means the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance Joint Powers Authority.

1.6 “Off-Site GSI Project” means a green stormwater infrastructure project eligible to exchange compliance credits under the RAC System.

1.7 “RAC System” means the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System.

2. NAME OF THE JPA
The JPA shall be known as the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance Joint Powers Authority.

3. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish an independent public agency in order to exercise powers common to each Member Agency and any other powers granted to the JPA under applicable law, including the Act and the Mello-Roos Act. The JPA shall administer the RAC System.

4. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE JPA

4.1 Separate Legal Entity. The JPA, as a joint powers authority, is a separate entity from the Member Agencies and is responsible for the administration of this Agreement. 1847
-3-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc

4.2 Filing of Notices with Secretary of State and County Clerk. Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, the JPA shall cause a notice of this Agreement to be prepared and filed with the office of the California Secretary of State and the State Controller containing the information required by California Government Code Section 6503.5.

4.3 Filing of Notices with County and LAFCO. Within seventy (70) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, the JPA shall cause a statement of the information concerning the JPA, required by California Government Code Section 53051, to be filed with the office of the California Secretary of State, the Contra Costa County Clerk, and the Contra Costa County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) stating the facts required to be stated pursuant to subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 53051.

5. TERM
The Agreement shall become effective upon the earlier date of July 1, 2026, provided that two Member Agencies have executed the Agreement by such date, or when all Member Agencies have executed the Agreement (“Effective Date”). The Agreement will remain effective until the JPA is dissolved through procedures outlined in Section 18 of this Agreement.

6. POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE JPA

6.1 General Powers. The JPA shall have the power in its own name to exercise any and all common powers of its Member Agencies and such additional powers accorded to it by law reasonably related to the purposes of the JPA, including, but not limited to, the powers to:
a. Acquire, lease, construct, own, manage, maintain, dispose of or operate (subject to the limitations herein) any buildings, works or improvements within the boundaries of the Member Agencies deemed necessary by the Board to implement the RAC System; b. Acquire, hold, manage, maintain, or dispose of any other property within the boundaries of the Member Agencies by any lawful means, including without limitation gift, purchase, lease, lease-purchase, license, eminent domain or sale to support the RAC System; c. Seek, receive, and administer funding from any available public, nonprofit, foundation or private source, including grants or loans under any available Federal, State and local programs to support the RAC System;
d. Make and enter into other contracts;
e. Form and implement one or more community facilities districts pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act;
f. Incur all authorized debts, liabilities, and obligations, subject to the limitations herein to accomplish the stated purposes and objectives of the JPA; 1848
-4-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
g. Receive gifts, contributions and donations of property, funds, services and other forms of financial or other assistance from any persons, firms, corporations or governmental entities;
h. Sue and be sued in its own name;
i. Seek the adoption or defeat of any Federal, State or local legislation or regulation necessary or desirable to accomplish the stated purposes and objectives of the JPA; j. Adopt rules, regulations, policies, bylaws and procedures governing the operation of the JPA;
k. Invest money pursuant to California Government Code Section 6505.5 that is not required for the immediate necessities of the JPA, as the JPA determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies, pursuant to Section 53601 of the California Government Code as it now exists or may hereafter be amended; l. Carry out and enforce all the provisions of this Agreement; and m. Exercise all other powers not specifically mentioned herein, but common to Member Agencies, and authorized by California Government Code Section 6508 as it now exists or may hereafter be amended.

6.2 Specific Powers and Obligations. The JPA shall have the power in its own name to exercise the following specific powers and obligations to:
a. Conduct an audit of the records and accounts of the JPA annually by an independent certified public accountant and ensure that copies of such audit report shall be filed with the State Controller and the County Auditor, and shall be provided to the Member Agencies no later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of such audit reports by the JPA; b. Use any statutory power available to it necessary or desirable to finance the exercise of any power of the JPA; and
c. Defend, hold harmless and indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by law, each Member Agency from any liability, claims, suits or other actions.

7. BOARD OF DIRECTORS

7.1 JPA Governing Board. The JPA shall be governed by a Board of Directors. Each director shall have a single vote on matters coming before the Board.

7.2 Board Members and Alternates. Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, each Member Agency shall designate and appoint one its officers, officials, or employees to serve as its representative on the Board. Within thirty (30) days after a new Member Agency becomes a party to this Agreement, the Member Agency shall designate and appoint one of its officers, officials, or employees to serve as its representative on the Board.

Each Member Agency may appoint an alternate representative who is authorized to serve on the 1849
-5-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
Board only in the absence of the Member Agency’s primary representative, with the same authority as the primary representative. All primary representatives and alternates shall serve until they are replaced by the appointing Member Agency, or until the withdrawal of the Member Agency from this Agreement, or until such time as they are no longer an officer, official, or employee of the Member Agency. Board members and their alternates shall serve without compensation, but they shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses they actually incur in connection with their service on the Board, provided such expense is authorized in advance by the Board.

7.3 Qualifications. Each Member Agency shall determine the officers, officials, or employees that will serve as the Member Agency’s primary representative, and their alternate, on the Board of Directors.

7.4 Board Officers. The Board shall annually select one of its members to serve as Chair and another member to serve as Vice Chair.
a. If the Chair is unable to continue serving on the Board, then the ViceChair shall become Chair. The Board shall then select a new Vice Chair from among the remaining members of the Board.
b. If the Vice Chair is unable to continue serving on the Board, the Board shall select a new Vice Chair from among the remaining members of the Board. c. The Chair shall preside over all meetings of the Board and perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board in accordance with applicable law and this Agreement.
d. The Vice-Chair shall preside over all meetings of the Board in the Chair’s absence and perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board in accordance with applicable law and this Agreement when the Chair is absent.

7.5 Additional Officers and Consultants. The Board may appoint any additional officers deemed necessary or desirable. The Board may also retain such consultants or independent contractors as may be deemed necessary.

7.6 Bonding Requirements. The officers or persons designated to have charge of, handle, or have access to any funds or property of the JPA shall be so designated and empowered by the Board. Each such officer or person may be required to file an official bond with the JPA in an amount established by the Board.

7.7 Subcommittees. The Board may create permanent or ad hoc subcommittees to give advice to the Board on such matters as may be referred to such subcommittee by the Board.

7.8 Meetings. The Board shall hold publicly noticed meetings in accordance with a schedule established by the Board. The Board shall meet no less than once per year. Meetings shall be conducted and noticed in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act.

7.9 Voting. All voting powers of the JPA shall reside in the Board. 1850
-6-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc

7.10 Quorum; Votes for Board Actions. A majority of the members of the Board, or their alternates, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum of the Board may adjourn a meeting for lack of quorum. Except as provided in Section 14 or where a larger affirmative vote is required by law, any action of the Board shall require an affirmative vote of a majority of the Directors present at a meeting, provided that a quorum of the Board is present.

7.11 Approval of Annual Budget. The JPA’s fiscal year shall begin July 1 of each calendar year, and it shall end on June 30 of the next calendar year; provided, however, that the JPA’s first fiscal year shall begin the date this Agreement becomes effective, and it shall end on the June 30 occurring thereafter. In each fiscal year after the first fiscal year, prior to April 1 of each year, the Manager shall prepare and present a proposed budget for the following fiscal year to the Board for its review and consideration; and prior to July 1 of each year, the Board shall consider approving the final budget for the following fiscal year.

7.12 Minutes. The Secretary shall cause minutes of all meetings of the Board to be drafted. Upon approval by the Board, such minutes shall become a part of the official records of the JPA.

7.13 Conflicts of Interest.
a. California Political Reform Act. Board members shall be considered “public officials” within the meaning of the California Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended, and its regulations, for purposes of financial disclosure, conflict of interest and other requirements of such Act.
b. Levine Act. Board members are “officials” within the meaning of California Government Code Section 84308 (the “Levine Act”) and subject to the restrictions of such act on the acceptance, solicitation or direction of contributions.

8. POWERS AND DUTIES OF GOVERNING BOARD

8.1 Powers and Duties. In addition to exercising the powers and obligations of the JPA set forth in Section 6, or as otherwise provided by law, the JPA Board of Directors shall have the following powers:
a. Perform the activities described in Section 8.2 with respect to the community facilities district described therein;
b. Perform activities necessary and convenient to assist Member Agencies comply with the Municipal Regional Permit and to implement the RAC System, including filing required documentation with the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board; c. Review and recommend an annual budget to the Member Agencies, which shall include the proposed contribution from each Member Agency; d. Make and enter into contracts or sub-contracts, and authorize by resolution officers or agents to execute such contracts;
1851
-7-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
e. Incur debt, liabilities and obligations on behalf of the JPA as authorized by law;
f. Invest JPA funds pursuant to an investment policy of the JPA adopted by the Board of Directors;
g. Receive contributions, donations or grants of property, funds, services, or other forms of assistance from any source;
h. Coordinate JPA activities with other Joint Powers Authorities or public agencies established for similar purposes in pursuing the common purposes set forth above; i. Appoint a Legal Advisor for the JPA;
j. Appoint, suspend and or terminate the Manager or enter into and terminate agreements for Management Services;
k. Appoint a Secretary;
l. Adopt, and amend from time to time, bylaws, rules, and regulations for the conduct of meetings of the Board and of the affairs of the JPA consistent with this Agreement; and
m. Adopt, and amend from time to time, a conflict of interest code.

8.2 Community Facilities District. The Board of Directors will consider forming one or more community facilities districts (each, a “CFD”) in accordance with the Mello-Roos Act to finance maintenance of Off-Site GSI Projects. If a CFD is formed by the Board, the following will apply:
a. The CFD will levy special taxes on development sites owned by private buyers to finance maintenance of Off-Site GSI Projects. Off-Site GSI Projects may be publiclyowned or privately-owned. The JPA is authorized and empowered to enter into agreements with owners of Off-Site GSI Projects to provide for CFD funding of maintenance. b. The CFD will initially be formed to include (i) original CFD boundaries that consist of a single property within the jurisdiction of one of the Member Agencies, and (ii) a future annexation area that includes the remaining territory of the initial Member Agencies. As a result of such agencies executing this Agreement, no further approval shall be required from such Member Agencies for the Board of Directors to include such Member Agencies’ territory in the original CFD boundaries or the CFD’s future annexation area or to annex properties in such Member Agencies’ territory to a CFD.
c. As additional public agencies join the CFD, the Board of Directors will consider adding such agencies’ territory to the CFD’s future annexation area. As a result of such agencies executing this Agreement, no further approval shall be required from such agencies for the Board of Directors to add such agencies’ territory to the CFD’s future annexation area or to annex properties in such Member Agencies’ territory to a CFD. 1852
-8-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
d. Each Member Agency shall approve this Agreement by adopting a resolution in the form determined by the JPA. The terms and provisions of such resolution along with this Agreement shall constitute a joint exercise of powers agreement as defined in Section 53316.2 of the Mello-Roos Act between the JPA and a Member Agency. e. The Board of Directors will be responsible for considering the levy of special taxes to fund maintenance of Off-Site GSI Projects and administering the CFD. The Board of Directors may engage necessary consultants to assist with the formation and administration of a CFD.
f. The Board of Directors shall be responsible for preparing and approving all reports and notices required by the Mello-Roos Act. The Board of Directors may delegate to the Manager, or contract with another person or entity, the preparation of reports and notices required by the Mello-Roos Act, provided that the Board of Directors retains discretion to approve the reports and notices prior to submission, circulation, or publication.

9. OPERATIONS AND FACILITIES

9.1 Principal Office. The principal physical office of the JPA shall be established by Board resolution at one of the Member Agencies’ offices or at another suitable location within a Member Agency’s jurisdiction.

9.2 Assumption of Responsibilities by the JPA. As soon as practicable after the Effective Date of this Agreement, a notice of an organizational meeting of the Board shall be published. During the first meeting, the Board shall designate a Manager, or engage a contractor to perform Management Services, who shall have the authority described in Section 11 and as otherwise delegated by the Board.

9.3 Delegation of Authority; Transfer of Records, Accounts, Funds and Property.

The JPA shall establish procedures by which it may receive the transfer of records, accounts, funds or property from Member Agencies or other entities.

10. NO EMPLOYEES

10.1 The JPA shall not hire employees or retain consultants that could otherwise be classified as common law employees.

11. MANAGER OF THE JPA

11.1 Powers and Duties. The Manager contracted by the Agency may be a staff person of one of the Member Agencies, a consultant, an independent contractor, or an employee of another entity who can perform the responsibilities and duties described in this section JPA, as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. The Manager shall have the following powers, responsibilities and duties:
a. Plan, coordinate and supervise the operation of the JPA on a day-to-day basis to ensure that the policies and direction of the Board are implemented operationally and administratively;
1853
-9-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
b. Make recommendations to the Board regarding the operations of the JPA and, if formed, the CFD;
c. Supervise and manage JPA contractors;
d. Establish administrative policies and procedures for the JPA consistent with and in order to implement directives from the Board; e. Prepare the annual budget for submission to the Board; f. Support compliance activities for the Member Agencies’ compliance with the Municipal Regional Permit through the RAC System; and g. Such other powers and authority delegated by the Board.

12. TREASURER AND AUDITOR

12.1 The Board shall appoint one of its officers to be the Auditor of the JPA. The Auditor shall draw warrants or check-warrants against funds of the JPA held by the Treasurer when the demands are approved by the Board of Directors or other person designated for that purpose and delegated that authority. The Board may transfer the responsibilities of Auditor to any person or entity authorized by Government Code Sections 6505.5 or 6505.6.

12.2 The Treasurer of the JPA shall be a certified public accountant. The Treasurer shall receive, have custody of, and disburse all monies of the JPA. The Board may transfer the responsibilities of Treasurer to any person or entity authorized by Government Code Sections 6505.5 or 6505.6.

13. INSURANCE AND LIABILITY

13.1 Insurance Coverage. The JPA shall be responsible for obtaining insurance coverage for its activities, as the Board deems appropriate.

13.2 Limitation on Liability. No debt, liability, or obligation of the JPA shall constitute a debt, liability, or obligation of any Member Agency. Except as expressly authorized by the Member Agencies, no Member Agency shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of another Member Agency’s officers or employees nor shall a Member Agency incur any liabilities arising out of the services and activities of another Member Agency’s officers or employees.

14. ADDITION OF MEMBER AGENCIES
The addition of any other agency as a Member Agency to the JPA shall require the approval of three-quarters of the entire Board. Upon approval by the Board, the new Member Agency shall execute a copy of this Agreement and return it to the JPA to be appended to the official version of this Agreement. Recognizing the effort of the original Member Agencies to establish the JPA, the Board may require a financial contribution to become a member of the JPA. 1854
-10-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc

15. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS: COST ALLOCATION

15.1 Records and Accounts. The JPA shall cause to be kept accurate and correct books of account, showing capital costs (if any), and maintenance and operation costs of the JPA. The aforementioned described books and records shall be open to inspection at all times during normal business hours by Member Agencies. The Treasurer shall cause all financial records of the JPA to be audited by an independent public accountant or certified public accountant at least once a fiscal year and a copy of the audit to be delivered promptly to each Member Agency.

15.2 Allocation of Operating Expenses. Unless changed by mutual agreement of the Member Agencies, the operating costs and expenses in the budget shall be shared equally by the Member Agencies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any remaining operating costs and expenses associated with the operation and maintenance of the Off-Site GSI Projects and the administration of the CFD, which are not fully paid for by special taxes collected by the CFD, shall be apportioned to the Member Agencies based upon the maximum special taxes levied in each Member Agency’s jurisdiction.

16. WITHDRAWAL OF A MEMBER AGENCY FROM THE JOINT POWERS

AUTHORITY
A Member Agency may withdraw from this Agreement by filing written notice of intention to do so with the Manager and Chair no later than 5:00 p.m. of the December 31st immediately preceding the commencement of the following fiscal year (July 1 - June 30). The Member Agency’s withdrawal shall be effective at 11:59 p.m. on June 30th of the fiscal year in which the notice of intention was received. Withdrawal shall not relieve the Member Agency from any financial commitments associated with projects or programs that the withdrawing Member agreed to participate in prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. The withdrawal of any Member Agency shall not terminate this Agreement provided at least two (2) Member Agencies remain parties to the Agreement.

Withdrawal by a Member Agency shall not have any effect on the obligation to pay special taxes of any property in the jurisdiction of such Member Agency that has annexed into a CFD.

17. DISPOSITION OF ASSETS UPON WITHDRAWAL OF A MEMBER AGENCY No Member Agency, by withdrawing, shall, except as may be agreed to by the Board, be entitled to payment or return of funds paid or property donated, if any, by the withdrawing Member Agency to the JPA or to any distribution of its assets.

18. TERMINATION; DISSOLUTION AND DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
This Agreement may be terminated and the JPA dissolved upon the consent of all Member Agencies then party to the JPA. Upon termination of this Agreement and dissolution of the JPA, JPA funds shall first be used to pay expenses, debts, liabilities and obligations of the JPA; and any remaining JPA funds shall be distributed to the Member Agencies in proportion to contributions made by the Member Agencies. The Board shall reasonably value any remaining property in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This JPA shall not dissolve as long as there are properties within the boundaries of a CFD that are obligated to pay 1855
-11-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
special taxes to maintain Off-Site GSI Projects unless the authority for governance of the CFD has been transferred by the JPA to another jurisdiction in accordance with the Mello-Roos Act.

19. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets of Member Agencies may be transferred to the JPA according to the disposition rules of the Member Agencies.

20. CONTRIBUTIONS AND ADVANCES
Pursuant to Government Code Section 6504, the Member Agencies may in their discretion make financial contributions, loans or advances to the JPA for the purposes of the JPA set forth in this Agreement. The repayment of such contribution, loans or advances will be on the written terms agreed to by the Member Agency making the contribution, loan or advance and the JPA.

21. LIMITATIONS ON POWERS
As required by Government Code Section 6509, the power of the JPA is subject to the restrictions upon the manner of exercising power possessed by the City of San Pablo.

22. AMENDMENT
Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and approved by the governing bodies of all Member Agencies, provided, however, that no such amendment shall be entered into if the amendment would conflict with the provisions of any bonds (as defined in Government Code section 6585(c)), indenture, trust agreement, contract or other agreement securing or relating to any outstanding bonds of the JPA issued pursuant to state or federal laws. In addition, no amendment shall have any effect on the JPA’s authority to levy or collect special taxes or pay such special taxes to maintain Off-Site GSI Projects unless the authority for governance of the CFD has been transferred by the JPA to another jurisdiction in accordance with the Mello-Roos Act.

23. NOTICE
Any notice required to be given or delivered by any provision of this Agreement shall be personally delivered or deposited in the U.S. Mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the Member Agencies at their addresses as reflected in the records of the JPA, and shall be deemed to have been received by the Member Agencies to which the same is addressed upon the earlier of receipt or seventy-two (72) hours after mailing.

24. SEVERABILITY
If a provision of the Agreement is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected.

25. SUCCESSORS
1856
-12-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
This Agreement shall be binding upon and accrue to the benefit of any successor of a Member Agency.

26. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION
No Member Agency may assign any rights or delegate any duties under this Agreement without the written consent of all other Member Agencies.

27. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in one (1) or more counterparts.

28. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

The Member Agencies and the JPA shall make reasonable efforts to settle all disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. Should any dispute among the Member Agencies arise out of this Agreement and should the Member Agencies be unable to resolve the dispute, the Member Agencies shall, at the written request of any Member Agency, meet in mediation and attempt in good faith to reach a resolution with the assistance of a mutually acceptable mediator.

In the event that mediation does not result in the settlement of a dispute within 120 days after the demand for mediation is made, any Member Agency and the JPA may pursue any remedies provided by law.

29. INTEGRATION
This Agreement represents the full and entire Agreement among the Members.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Joint Powers Agreement establishing the Joint Powers Authority set forth above. [PARTY]
By: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: _______________________________
Date: _______________________________
Party: _____________________________
[PARTY]
1857
-13-
13074-0002\3208885v8.doc
By: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: _______________________________
Date: _______________________________
Party: _____________________________
1858

Page 1 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
Public Works
DATE: June 16, 2026
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Director of Public Works
Subject: Task Authorization to Veolia for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Grade 5 Risk Assessment Analysis Sewer Rehabilitation
Work
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed $5,441,812 expenditure is included within the approved Fiscal Year 2025–2026 Wastewater
Enterprise Fund budget (Account String:
40322931-400708-22230). There is no impact on the
General Fund.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff is recommending City Council approval of a
resolution for Veolia to issue subcontracts to Glosage
Engineering, Inc., V.W. Housen & Associates, Questa
Engineering and J Majors & Associates for the work
associated with the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Grade 5 Risk
Assessment Analysis (RAA) project.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to AUTHORIZE the issuance of a Task Authorization to Veolia Water West Operating
Services, Inc. for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Grade 5 Risk Assessment Analysis Project to repair and/or rehabilitate two miles of sanitary sewer pipes, in an amount not to
exceed $5,441,812, including a base amount of
$4,534,843 and a 20 percent contingency - Public Works
Department (Tawfic Halaby/ 510-620-5482).

DISCUSSION:

AGENDA
REPORT
1859

Page 2 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
The 2018 Settlement Agreement with San Francisco Baykeeper requires the City of Richmond to repair or replace at least two miles of Grade 5 gravity sewer per year, based on a five-year rolling average, pursuant to Paragraph 31.c (Attachment 1). To achieve this goal, the City must allocate annual capital funding to cover the cost of these mandated repairs.

Veolia identified 10,560 lineal feet of sanitary sewer pipeline meeting the Settlement Agreement criteria, that are proposed to be replaced or rehabilitated on this project. On March 2, 2026, a request for bids was posted to BidsOnline, and 29 prospective bidders downloaded the bid information (Attachment 2). On April 13, 2026, five bids were received from (in alphabetical order): APB General Engineering, Cratus Inc, Glosage Engineering Inc, JDB & Sons Construction, Inc. and W.R. Forde Associates, Inc (Attachment 3).

The bids received were as follows, in increasing bid amount:
 Glosage Engineering Inc $3,653,769.00
 Cratus Inc $4,064,000.00
 APB General Engineering $4,650,000.00
 W.R. Forde Associates, Inc $4,858,337.00
 JDB & Sons Construction, Inc $6,994,250.00
City and Veolia staff have reviewed the bids and have determined that Glosage Engineering Inc is the lowest responsive bid and is responsible.

Two technical firms (V.W. Housen & Associates and Questa Engineering) also submitted proposals to Veolia to provide engineering services and compaction testing, respectively, during the construction. Additionally, J Majors & Associates, was selected to provide community outreach support throughout the duration of the project.

While staff typically recommends a 10 to15 percent contingency for capital projects, the contingency for the Grade 5 Sewer Replacement projects is historically higher, thus a 20 percent contingency is proposed for this project. This is due to the nature of older pipelines, which often present unforeseen challenges once they are uncovered. The additional contingency will provide a buffer to address potential issues and/or unforeseen conditions such as unexpected deterioration, uncharted underground utilities, and necessary modifications to ensure compliance with current standards. This approach aims to mitigate risks and ensure the project can be completed without significant delays or additional funding requests.

In accordance to the City’s contract with Veolia, Veolia is responsible for the construction management of City Water Resource projects at a charge of 16.5 percent of the construction cost and 9 percent of any contingencies.

For this project, in addition to the fee for Glosage Engineering Inc, Veolia’s 16.5 percent charge will also apply to the fees for V.W. Housen ($90,300), Questa ($88,500) and J Majors & Associates ($60,000). The markup will be applied to any contingency work 1860

Page 3 of 3 ends

June 16, 2026
that the City directs Glosage Engineering Inc, V.W. Housen & Associates, Questa Engineering and J Majors & Associates to perform. These combined costs are reflected in the table below as the total project cost (Attachment 4).

The total estimated cost of this project, if awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, is as follows:

Glosage Engineering, Inc. $3,653,769
V.W. Housen & Associates $90,300
Questa Engineering $88,500
J Majors & Associates $60,000
Subtotal $3,892,569
Veolia Markup (16.5%) $642,274
Total Construction Cost $4,534,843
Contingency (with Veolia Markup) $906,969
Total Project Cost $5,441,812
City staff is requesting City Council adopt the resolution to authorize issuing the Task Authorization to Veolia for the 2025-26 Grade 5 Risk Assessment Analysis (RAA) project with a total project cost not-to-exceed $5,441,812 without prior City Council approval (Attachment 5).

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Baykeeper Settlement Agreement
Attachment 2 – RFP
Attachment 3 – BidSummary Report
Attachment 4 – Task Authorization
Attachment 5 – Resolution
1861
Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement 1 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829-MMC 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Daniel Cooper (Bar No. 153576)
LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.
1004 O’Reilly Avenue
San Francisco, California 94129
Telephone: (415) 440-6520
Facsimile: (415) 440-4155
Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER and

WEST COUNTY TOXICS COALITION
Erica A. Maharg (Bar No. 279396)
Nicole C. Sasaki (Bar No. 298736)

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 735-9700
Facsimile: (510) 735-9160
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit
corporation, and WEST COUNTY TOXICS
COALITION, a non-profit organization,
Plaintiffs,
v.

CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation,
Defendant.

Civil Case No.: 3:05-cv-03829-MMC

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT CITY
OF RICHMOND’S STIPULATED
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF 2018

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
TERMINATION OF 2006

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
TO VACATE HEARING; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
Order
;
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 126 1862
Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement 2 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829-MMC 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2006, Plaintiffs San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”) and West County Toxics Coalition (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant City of Richmond (“Richmond”) (collectively, “Parties”) settled Plaintiffs’ 2005 Clean Water Act citizen suit via settlement agreement (Docket Nos. 29; 32-1 (the “2006 Settlement Agreement”)), and the Court retained jurisdiction over specified claims for the sole purpose of resolving any dispute between the Parties in relation to the enforcement of the terms of the 2006 Settlement Agreement. (Docket Nos. 32; 43.); WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for an Order Finding Richmond in Civil Contempt of Court (“Motion”) alleging violation of the terms of the 2006 Settlement Agreement. (Docket No. 38.). On October 27, 2017, upon request of the Parties, this Court continued the briefing and hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to allow the Parties to hold a settlement conference. (Docket No. 43.); WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated, and this Court previously ordered, that the original Termination Date of the 2006 Settlement Agreement should be extended as to Richmond, and the current expiration date of the Parties’ 2006 Settlement Agreement is June 9, 2018. (Docket Nos. 34, 35, 40, 43.);
WHEREAS, Paragraph 10 of the 2006 Settlement Agreement specifies that the agreement shall terminate within the applicable time period “so long as all payments, fees, and costs due under or pursuant to th[e] [2006] Settlement Agreement, including, but not limited to, provisions governing Supplemental Environmental Projects, Attorney’s Fees and Costs, and Dispute Resolution, have been paid in full.” (Docket No. 32-1 at ¶10.);
WHEREAS, based upon stipulation of the Parties as a result of settlement discussions, (Docket No. 50), on March 13, 2018, this Court ordered that a Notice of Settlement be filed no later than March 30, 2018, that the briefing schedule and hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion be held off-calendar while the Parties finalize settlement documents, and that on or before May 29, 2018, after the close of the 45-day settlement review period set forth in 40 C.F.R. §135.5 with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) without objection, the Parties shall file their settlement-related documents, or alternatively, provide this Court with a status update with respect to this Court’s October 27, 2017 Order to set a hearing and briefing schedule (Docket No. 43) on Plaintiffs’ Motion. (Docket No. 52.);
;
Order
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 2 of 126 1863
Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement 3 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829-MMC 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, on March 30, 2018, the Parties filed a Notice of Settlement, notifying the Court that the Parties had reached a full settlement to resolve all outstanding issues in this action (“2018 Settlement Agreement” attached as Exhibit A to the [Proposed] Order filed concurrently herewith), and Plaintiffs served copies of the 2018 Settlement Agreement via U.S. Mail to DOJ and EPA for a mandatory 45-day review period under 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3) and 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. (Docket No. 53.); WHEREAS, on May 21, 2018, DOJ notified the Court and the Parties that it does not object to the entry of the 2018 Settlement Agreement. (Docket. No. 54.); WHEREAS, the Parties now agree: (1) to terminate the 2006 Settlement Agreement (Docket Nos. 29; 32-1) concurrently with this Court’s approval and entry of the Order retaining jurisdiction to enforce compliance by the Parties with the terms of the 2018 Settlement Agreement, as that may occur before the 2006 Settlement Agreement’s current expiration date of June 9, 2018 (Docket Nos. 34, 35, 40, 43); and (2) that all terms and conditions for termination of the 2006 Settlement Agreement, including those conditions specified in Paragraph 10 of the 2006 Settlement Agreement, have been paid and satisfied in full;
WHEREFORE, the Parties also hereby provide this Court with their settlement-related documents (the 2018 Settlement Agreement, as noted above) as required by this Court’s March 13, 2018 Order (Docket No. 52);
WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court: (1) approve and enter the [Proposed] Order of the Court retaining jurisdiction over the Parties for the sole purpose of enforcing compliance by the Parties with the terms of the 2018 Settlement Agreement until the 2018 Settlement Agreement terminates; (2) terminate the 2006 Settlement Agreement (Docket Nos. 29 and 32-1) in its entirety upon this Court’s approval and entry of the [Proposed] Order; and (3) dismiss Plaintiffs’ Motion with prejudice and vacate the associated hearing and briefing schedule (Docket Nos. 38 and 43); and WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request the Court to approve and enter the [Proposed] Order attached hereto.
///
///
///
;
Order
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 3 of 126 1864
Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement 4 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829-MMC 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: May 24, 2018
By: /s/ Nicole C. Sasaki
Nicole C. Sasaki
Attorney for Plaintiff

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
Dated: May 24, 2018
By: /s/ Daniel Cooper
Daniel Cooper
Attorney for Plaintiffs
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER and

WEST COUNTY TOXICS COALITION
Dated: May 24, 2018

DOWNEY BRAND LLP
By: / s/ Nicole E. Granquist (auth. to e-sign 05/24/18) Nicole Granquist
Attorney for Defendant

CITY OF RICHMOND
Order
;
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 4 of 126 1865
Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement 5 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829-MMC 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties for the sole purpose of enforcing compliance by the Plaintiffs and Defendant with the terms of the 2018 Settlement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, until the 2018 Settlement Agreement terminates.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties’ 2006 Settlement Agreement (Docket Nos. 29 and 32-1) is terminated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order Finding Richmond in Civil Contempt of Court (“Motion”) (Docket No. 38) is dismissed with prejudice, and the associated hearing and briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion is vacated (Docket No. 43).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________, 2018
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States Senior District Court Judge
June 4
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States Senior District Court Jud
;
Order
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 5 of 126 1866
Exhibit A
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 6 of 126 1867
Settlement Agreement 1 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Daniel Cooper (Bar No. 153576)
LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.
1004 O’Reilly Avenue
San Francisco, California 94129
Telephone: (415) 440-6520
Facsimile: (415) 440-4155
Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER and

WEST COUNTY TOXICS COALITION
Erica A. Maharg (Bar No. 279396)
Nicole C. Sasaki (Bar No. 298736)

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
Additional Counsel on Following Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit
corporation, and WEST COUNTY TOXICS
COALITION, a non-profit organization,
Plaintiffs,
v.

CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation,
Defendant.

Civil Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 7 of 126 1868
Settlement Agreement 2 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

DOWNEY BRAND LLP
NICOLE E. GRANQUIST (Bar No. 199017)
PATRICK F. VEASY (Bar No. 301456)
621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814-4731
Telephone: 916.444.1000
Facsimile: 916.444.2100
[email protected]
[email protected]
Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF RICHMOND
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 8 of 126 1869
Settlement Agreement 3 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
2018 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement (hereinafter, “2018 Settlement Agreement”) entered into by Plaintiffs San Francisco Baykeeper and West County Toxics Coalition (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant City of Richmond (“Richmond”) (collectively, the “Parties”), supersedes and replaces all prior settlement agreements or amendments to settlement agreements in this action. The 2018 Settlement Agreement is entered into by the Parties with respect to the following facts, objectives, and commitments:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are non-profit corporations dedicated to, among other things, the protection and enhancement of the water quality of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary and to protect the communities of West Contra Costa County against toxic threats in the area; WHEREAS, Richmond owns a publicly-owned treatment works, which includes a treatment works and sanitary sewer collection system that collects, treats, and discharges wastewater generated by residential, commercial, and industrial sources, pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, (“Regional Board”) Order No. R2-2013-0016, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit No. CA0038539 (the “2013 Joint Permit”).

WHEREAS, on October 17, 2006, the Parties entered into a settlement agreement to informally resolve specified claims in Baykeeper and West County Toxics Coalition v. City of Richmond, West County Wastewater District, Veolia North America Operating Services, and West County Agency, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil Case No. 05- 03829 MMC (hereinafter, the “2006 Settlement Agreement”); WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, Plaintiffs filed with the Court a Motion for an Order Finding Richmond in Civil Contempt of Court (“Motion”), alleging violations of the 2006 Settlement Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in, consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties, Plaintiffs and Richmond hereby agree as follows:

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 9 of 126 1870
Settlement Agreement 4 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
I. GENERAL OBJECTIVES

1. The objectives of this 2018 Settlement Agreement are:
a. To ensure that Richmond continues to improve efforts to comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”); b. To ensure that Richmond continues to use, implement, and improve ways, means, and methods to prevent or reduce sanitary sewer overflows (“SSOs”); and c. To further the goals and objectives of the CWA.

II. DEFINITIONS

2. Unless otherwise expressly defined herein, terms used in this 2018 Settlement Agreement, which are defined in the CWA or in regulations or rules promulgated under the CWA, have the meaning assigned to them in the applicable statutes, regulations, or rules. Whenever terms listed below are used in this 2018 Settlement Agreement, the following definitions apply:
a. “FOG” means fats, oil, and grease.
b. “2018 Settlement Agreement” means this Settlement Agreement and any attachments or documents incorporated by reference into this 2018 Settlement Agreement. c. “Collection System” means the sewer pipes and lines, manholes or maintenance holes, pump stations, and all appurtenances thereto under ownership of Richmond Municipal Sewer District No. 1 that are used to convey wastewater generated by residential, commercial, and industrial sources to the Richmond Wastewater Treatment Plant. Richmond’s Collection System is currently operated and maintained under contract by Veolia Water West Operating Services (“Veolia”). d. “Sewer line segment” means any section of publicly owned sewer line or pipe located between: (1) two manholes/maintenance holes; (2) a pump station and a manhole/maintenance hole; (3) a pump station or a manhole/maintenance hole and a headworks structure; or (4) a sewer line or pipe otherwise identifiable as a discrete section.
e. “Day” means a calendar day. In computing any period of time under this 2018 Settlement Agreement, where the last day of such period is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal or State Holiday, the period runs until the close of business on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal or State Holiday.

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 10 of 126 1871
Settlement Agreement 5 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
f. “Design Storm” means the 10-year, 24-hour storm event occurring across the entire area served by Richmond’s collection system with wet antecedent soil conditions. g. “Sanitary Sewer Overflows,” “overflow,” or “SSO” has the same meaning as that term is defined in Section A.1. of the Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems, State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2006-0003 (hereinafter the “SSO General WDR”), or any amendment thereto, and which currently means: “any overflow, spill, release, discharge or diversion of untreated or partially treated wastewater from a sanitary sewer system. SSOs include (i) overflows or releases of untreated or partially treated wastewater that reach waters of the United States; (ii) overflows or releases of untreated or partially treated wastewater that do not reach waters of the United States; and (iii) wastewater backups into buildings and on private property that are caused by blockages or flow conditions within the publicly owned portion of a sanitary sewer system.” For purposes of this definition, the term “waters of the United States” has the meaning as set forth in 40 C.F.R. section 122.2.
h. “2013 Joint Permit” means NPDES Permit No. CA0038539, Order No. R2-2013-0016, as presently constituted and/or as subsequently revised or renewed. i. “Inflow” means wastewater or water that may enter a collection system through unpermitted connections, drains, or manholes.
j. “Infiltration” means groundwater, rainwater, or other surface water that may enter a collection system through its pipes, joints, or cracks. k. “System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan” or “SECAP” means one or more documents or databases containing the information required by Section VIII of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs pursuant to CWA section 505(a), 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1355, and 1367. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to CWA sections 309(b), 505(c), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(b), 1365(c), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c). The Parties waive all objections that they may have to the Court’s jurisdiction to enter and enforce this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 11 of 126 1872
Settlement Agreement 6 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
IV. EFFECT OF 2018 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

4. Plaintiffs do not, by their consent to this 2018 Settlement Agreement, warrant or aver in any manner that Richmond’s compliance with this 2018 Settlement Agreement will constitute or result in compliance with any Federal or State law or regulation. Nothing in this 2018 Settlement Agreement shall be construed to affect or limit in any way the obligation of Richmond to comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations governing any activity required by this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

5. Neither this 2018 Settlement Agreement, nor any payment pursuant to the 2018 Settlement Agreement, shall constitute evidence or be construed as a finding, adjudication, or acknowledgement of any fact, law, or liability, nor shall it be construed as an admission of violation of any law, rule, regulation, permit, or administrative order by Richmond. However, this 2018 Settlement Agreement and/or any payment pursuant to the 2018 Settlement Agreement may constitute evidence in actions seeking to enforce compliance with this 2018 Settlement Agreement. Richmond maintains and reserves all defenses it may have to any alleged violations that may be raised in the future.

V. APPLICABILITY

6. This 2018 Settlement Agreement addresses all violations alleged by the Plaintiffs in their Motion.

7. The Parties certify that their undersigned representatives are fully authorized to enter into this 2018 Settlement Agreement, to execute it on behalf of the Parties, and to legally bind the Parties to its terms.

8. The Parties, including any successors or assigns, agree to be bound by this 2018 Settlement Agreement and not to contest its validity in any subsequent proceeding to implement and enforce its terms. No change in ownership or corporate or other legal status of Richmond or any transfer of Richmond’s assets or liabilities shall in any way alter the responsibilities of Richmond or any of its successors or assigns thereof, under this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

VI. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERMINATION DATE

9. Effective Date: The Effective Date of this 2018 Settlement Agreement shall be the date of the Order entering the Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement Agreement described in Section XX of Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 12 of 126 1873
Settlement Agreement 7 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

10. Term of 2018 Settlement Agreement: This 2018 Settlement Agreement shall continue in effect until July 15, 2028 (the “Term”) at which time, the 2018 Settlement Agreement, and all obligations under it, shall automatically terminate, unless one of the Parties has invoked Dispute Resolution in accordance with Section XVI of the 2018 Settlement Agreement.

VII. SSO STANDARDS

11. Richmond shall meet the following SSO Reduction Performance Goals each calendar year:

Calendar Year Maximum Number of
SSOs per 100 Miles of
Sewer Line/Year
2018 20
2019 15
2020 13
2021 11
2022 10
2023 9
2024 8
2025 7
2026 5
2027 5

12. Richmond shall eliminate capacity-related SSOs from the Collection System, except SSOs caused by storm events exceeding the Design Storm, in accordance with the following schedule:
a. Richmond shall eliminate capacity-related SSOs from areas of Richmond’s Collection System addressed by the projects listed in Paragraph 20 below, as depicted on Attachment F, on or before July 15, 2024, except such SSOs caused by storm events exceeding the Design Storm. b. Richmond shall further eliminate all capacity-related SSOs from Richmond’s Collection system on or before July 15, 2026, except such SSOs caused by storm events exceeding the Design Storm.
c. If Richmond identifies additional capital projects required to eliminate capacity-related SSOs in the SECAP described in Paragraph 17 below, the Parties shall meet and confer to negotiate a revised schedule to ensure capacity-related SSOs are eliminated during the term of this 2018 Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 13 of 126 (27) (24) (20) (18) (16) (15) (13) (9) (9) (37)
1874
Settlement Agreement 8 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Settlement Agreement. Disputes as to the engineering feasibility of any proposed schedule for implementation of those additional capacity projects shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI below.

13. Richmond shall have no more than two (2) SSOs from any two of the same sewer line segments or manhole/maintenance holes within any calendar year after December 31, 2024.

14. The standards required by Paragraphs 11-13, above, are collectively referred to as “SSO Standards.”

15. For purposes of determining compliance with the SSO Reduction Performance Goals, the maximum number of SSOs per 100 miles of sewer line per calendar year can be averaged over the entire Collection System, and SSOs caused by storm events exceeding the Design Storm shall not be counted.

16. For purposes of initially calculating the SSO Reduction Performance Goals, the Parties assume Richmond currently has 197 miles of sewer line in its Collection System. For purposes of calculating the SSO Reduction Performance Goals, the total allowable SSOs for the year shall be rounded using standard rounding as follows: 16.1 through 16.4 is considered 16, and 16.5 through 16.9 is considered

17. For example, for the year 2027, using the current sewer line mileage of 197 for Richmond, Richmond would be allowed 10 SSOs [(1.97 x 5 = 9.85) (9.85 => 10)].

VIII. CAPACITY-RELATED ANALYSIS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

17. Within ninety (90) days of obtaining the data from the Flow Monitoring Program described in paragraph 17.a. herein, but in any case no later than July 15, 2019, Richmond shall complete an updated System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (“Revised SECAP”), in accordance with the following requirements:
a. The Revised SECAP shall use flow monitoring data collected by Richmond during its Flow Monitoring Program. The Flow Monitoring Program shall collect data on a system-wide basis, so as to allow for analysis in the Revised SECAP of the impact of tidal inflow, dry-weather groundwater infiltration, and rain induced inflow and infiltration in the Collection System. Subject to the conditions set forth below, the Flow Monitoring Program shall also include data collection sufficient to analyze the hydraulic capacity of Richmond’s Collection System in the locations of capacity-related Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 14 of 126 1875
Settlement Agreement 9 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
improvement projects contained, but not yet completed, in the 2011 Master Plan, as described in Paragraph 20 of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, including the projected impact of those completed capacity improvement projects. The Flow Monitoring Program shall consist of two separate actions.

First, by December 1, 2018, provided rainfall has occurred in the thirty (30) days prior to December 1, 2018, Richmond shall install temporary flow meters in the Collection System, as needed, to provide sufficient data to perform a hydraulic analysis that: (1) identifies all capacity deficiencies in the Collection System, including locations predicted by the hydraulic model to result in SSOs during the Design Storm, and (2) assesses the projected impacts on the hydraulic capacity of the Collection System from the completed capacity improvement projects from the 2011 Master Plan identified in Paragraph 20 below, tidal inflow, dry-weather groundwater infiltration, and rain induced inflow and infiltration on the Collection System. The data collected during the Flow Monitoring Program shall be used to update, calibrate, and validate Richmond’s current hydraulic model. If no rainfall has occurred in the thirty (30) days prior to December 1, 2018, Richmond shall instead install temporary flow meters in the Collection System after rainfall of one (1) inch or more has occurred in a 24-hour period.

Once installed, the temporary flow meters will remain installed through March 31, 2019. Second, when the following condition is present between December 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023 or December 1, 2023 and March 31, 2024, Richmond will install temporary flow meters for a second time to obtain flow data for the 2024 SECAP described below: rainfall has occurred in the thirty (30) days prior to December 1, 2022 or December 1, 2023; or if no rainfall has occurred in the thirty (30) days prior to December 1, 2022 or December 1, 2023, rainfall of one (1) inch or more has occurred in a 24-hour period.
b. The Revised SECAP shall identify all measures needed to attain the capacity necessary to convey the Design Storm without capacity-related SSOs in Richmond’s Collection System. The Revised SECAP shall evaluate whether the MacDonald and Virginia, 1st Street Phase 1, and 1st Street Phase 2 projects described in Paragraph 20 herein (“Reevaluated Projects”), which were identified in the 2011 Master Plan, remain priority capacity projects or whether other projects identified while developing the Revised SECAP are higher priority. A higher priority project is determined by the reduction in the number of capacity-related SSOs the project is expected to result in, as reflected by Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 15 of 126 1876
Settlement Agreement 10 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Richmond’s SSO records and the hydraulic analysis described in Paragraph 17.a. c. The Revised SECAP shall include an implementation schedule to complete all measures needed to attain the capacity necessary to convey the Design Storm without capacity-related SSOs in the Collection System by July 15, 2026 or alternative date agreed upon by the Parties pursuant to Paragraph 12.c. The implementation schedule shall incorporate the schedule set forth in Paragraph 20, unless a reprioritization of those projects is needed to assure a systematic program (e.g., to assure that downstream sewer lines are upsized prior to upstream lines). If Richmond believes reprioritization is necessary, Richmond shall set forth its justification in the Revised SECAP. In any case, Richmond shall complete all projects identified in Paragraph 20 by June 30, 2024. d. The Revised SECAP shall include a hydraulic analysis that includes calculation for all sewer lines and all pump stations of estimated dry weather wastewater flow, estimated peak wet weather wastewater flow under the Design Storm, and other storm event scenarios, and total wastewater flow capacity when flowing full. The hydraulic analysis will be based on the flow monitoring data collected by Richmond during its Flow Monitoring Program. The model used in the hydraulic analysis will be calibrated and validated to verify its accuracy in predicting flows in the Collection System using data collected through the Flow Monitoring Program. The hydraulic analysis shall be sufficient to identify all capacity improvements necessary to convey peak wet weather flows during the Design Storm to the wastewater treatment plant without capacity-related SSOs in the Collection System. Findings of the hydraulic analysis shall be presented on a GIS system map, where feasible, or other database.
e. To aid the hydraulic analysis, Richmond shall maintain an updated, accurate inventory of the Collection System in a GIS system map. The GIS system map shall include all Collection System attributes required for the hydraulic modeling and further shall include system attributes that will facilitate Collection System operation and maintenance. System attributes shall include the following:
sewer line diameters and lengths; sewer line slope; service area covered by line segment; sewer line year of construction, pipe material, inspection history, cleaning history, SSO history, repair history; conflicting utilities; proximity to storm sewer(s), in feet; whether a sewer line is located in a right of way or an easement; manhole locations, depth, lid size, manhole diameter, rim elevation, and invert Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 16 of 126 1877
Settlement Agreement 11 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
elevation; and pump station mechanical, electrical, and instrument data.

18. Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the Revised SECAP and the associated GIS mapping on or before July 15, 2019. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the Revised SECAP. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments, or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted, within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the Revised SECAP to eliminate all capacity-related spills on or before July 15, 2026 or alternative date agreed upon by the Parties pursuant to Paragraph

12.c. shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

19. Within one hundred twenty (120) days of completing the Revised SECAP, but no later than December 31, 2019, Richmond shall complete an update to the 2011 Master Plan incorporating the project list and schedule from the Revised SECAP (“Updated Master Plan”) and seek City Council approval of the Updated Master Plan. The project list in the Updated Master Plan shall include capacity-related improvement projects included in the 2011 Master Plan, provided still necessary and appropriate after the Revised SECAP has been performed, and all capacity-related improvement projects identified by the Revised SECAP.

20. At a minimum, Richmond shall fund and complete the following capacity-related capital improvement projects identified in the 2011 Master Plan on the following schedule:

Capacity-Related Capital Improvement Project Deadline
13th Street August 31, 2018
Cutting and Carlson December 31, 2019
Hoffman Blvd. December 31, 2019
MacDonald & Virginia June 30, 2021
1st Street Phase 1 June 30, 2023
1st Street Phase 2 June 30, 2024
If the Reevaluated Projects have been replaced by higher priority projects as described in Paragraph

17.b, Richmond shall fund and complete those higher priority projects by July 15, 2024, unless the Parties mutually agree in writing, after meeting and conferring, that a different schedule is warranted.

21. Beginning July 31, 2018 and on an ongoing bi-annual basis (i.e., on January 30 and July 31) for the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs with bi-annual Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 17 of 126 1878
Settlement Agreement 12 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
reports regarding the design, funding, and construction status of all capacity-related capital improvement projects.

22. At least once every five (5) years from the date the Revised SECAP set forth in Paragraph 17 was completed, Richmond shall reevaluate and update the hydraulic analysis of the Collection System to reflect any changes in Collection System conditions, conditions or factors relevant to volumes of system rainfall-derived Infiltration and Inflow (“RDI/I”), dry weather infiltration, added service connections, or land-use patterns that would affect peak wet weather flows in the Collection System, the hydraulic capacity of the Collection System, and the ability of the Collection System to convey peak flows during the Design Storm without capacity-related SSOs. The 5-year update to the hydraulic analysis will rely upon data collected as part of a subsequent Flow Monitoring Program consistent with Paragraph 17.a., performed during the wet season prior to submission date of the 5-year update.

The 5-year update to the hydraulic analysis of Richmond’s Collection System will be consistent with the requirements in Paragraph 17 and shall assess the projected impact of completed capacity improvement projects from the Revised SECAP on the hydraulic capacity of the Collection System.

Richmond shall update the Revised SECAP by incorporating the updated hydraulic analysis. On or before October 15, 2024, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the updated 2024 SECAP. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the updated 2024 SECAP. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the updated 2024 SECAP to achieve the SSO Standards required shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

IX. COLLECTION SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT

ANALYSIS

23. Richmond shall ensure that, by June 30, 2018, all gravity sewer main lines and, by October 1, 2018, all force main sewer lines in Richmond’s Collection System have had their condition assessed within the last ten years. Condition assessment for gravity sewer lines shall be based on Closed Circuit Television (“CCTV”) inspection and shall employ the Sewer Line Condition Grading Matrix attached hereto as Attachment A. For force main sewer lines, condition assessment shall employ technologies Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 18 of 126 1879
Settlement Agreement 13 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
suitable by industry standards appropriate to the pipe material, the physical conditions encountered, and the operational parameters under which the force main assessment must be conducted, as defined in the U.S. EPA guidance document “Condition Assessment of Wastewater Collection Systems – white paper,” EPA/600/R-09/049, May 2009, attached hereto as Attachment E.

24. Throughout the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall implement a Condition Assessment Program that employs a minimum ten (10) year CCTV re-inspection cycle for all gravity sewer lines and more frequent CCTV inspection of gravity sewer main line “hot spots” as mandated by the Sewer Line Condition Grading Matrix defect score for the sewer line in issue. Force main sewer lines shall be re-inspected on the cycle defined in Table 2-1: of Attachment E.

25. No later than March 31, 2018, Richmond shall complete an updated Risk Assessment Analysis (“2018 Risk Assessment Analysis”) for all gravity sewer main lines in the Collection System rated as Grades 4 and 5 pursuant to the Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (“PACP”).

26. On or before March 31, 2018, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the 2018 Risk Assessment Analysis. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the 2018 Risk Assessment Analysis. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the 2018 Risk Assessment Analysis to achieve the SSO Standards shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

27. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of Plaintiffs’ comments on the 2018 Risk Assessment Analysis, Richmond shall incorporate the results of the analysis into its Collection System Rehabilitation/Repair schedule, set out in Section X below.

28. By January 15, 2019, and annually thereafter, Richmond shall perform an updated Risk Assessment Analysis on all gravity sewer line segments in Richmond’s Collection System rated Grade 4 or 5 via the PACP process and update the Rehabilitation/Repair schedule based on its results.

29. For the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, on or before January 15 of each year after 2018, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, that year’s updated Risk Assessment Analysis. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the updated Risk Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 19 of 126 1880
Settlement Agreement 14 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Assessment Analysis. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the updated Risk Assessment Analysis to inform a program sufficient to achieve the SSO Standards shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

X. REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND REHABILITATION

30. On or before April 30, 2018, Richmond shall fund and complete construction of the partially collapsed pipe located along South 23rd Street. Within ten (10) days of completion, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs written confirmation.

31. Within ten (10) years of the Effective Date of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall repair or replace approximately thirty-one miles of Grade 5 gravity sewer line, initially identified in the 2018 Risk Assessment Analysis as follows:
a. 4.8 miles of PACP rated Grade 5 gravity sewer line will be repaired or replaced as part of the13th Street, Cutting and Carlson, Hoffman Blvd., and South 23rd Street projects described in Paragraphs 20 and 30 of this 2018 Settlement Agreement; b. 6.2 miles of PACP rated Grade 5 gravity sewer line will be repaired or replaced as part of the MacDonald & Virginia, 1st Street Phase 1, and 1st Street Phase 2 projects described in Paragraph 20 of this 2018 Settlement Agreement; and
c. At least 20 miles of PACP rated Grade 5 gravity sewer line will be repaired or replaced at an approximate rate of at least 2 miles of gravity sewer line per year, based on a rolling 5-year average. Compliance with this requirement will be assessed beginning on July 1, 2018 (so the first year is July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019). The specific Grade 5 gravity sewer lines identified in the 2018 Risk Assessment Analysis may change over time (some of the initial Grade 5 gravity sewer lines may be removed from the list because they are determined not to be Grade 5 after further investigation, and new Grade 5 gravity sewer lines may be added to future Risk Assessment Analyses due to continued aging of the Collection System); Richmond is compliant with this Paragraph if Richmond satisfies the mileage specified. Further, if Richmond achieves compliance with the SSO Reduction Performance Goals in Paragraph 11 of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, such attainment Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 20 of 126 1881
Settlement Agreement 15 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
can be the basis for extending the deadline for repairing or replacing the remaining Grade 5 gravity sewer lines. The Parties shall meet and confer upon Richmond’s request, and Plaintiffs shall consider Richmond’s request in good faith.

32. During the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, on or before July 31 of each year, Richmond shall report to Plaintiffs, in electronic format, documenting the completion of the annually required repairs to Grade 5 sewer line segments.

XI. COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

33. On or before March 31, 2018, Richmond shall revise Veolia’s July 2013 Operations and Maintenance Plan (“2018 O&M Plan”) as follows:
a. Detail procedures used during cleaning for trapping debris, roots, and FOG and quantifying the amount of debris, roots, and FOG removed during cleaning, including but not limited to, identifying the debris trap type and standardized methodology used by Richmond during cleaning; b. Adhere to the specific cleaning frequencies and response actions in the Cleaning Frequency Response Matrix, attached hereto as Attachment D;
c. Require that cleaning of gravity sewer line segments by Richmond shall include use of a fixed hydro-flushing nozzle centering device (i.e., a nozzle skid) having a minimum of four (4) endpoints with a diameter within one (1) inch of the diameter of the gravity sewer line segment being cleaned to ensure the cleaning was effective. A gravity sewer line shall be considered adequately cleaned if the device passes through the entire sewer line segment, from manhole to manhole. If passage of the device from manhole to manhole in the gravity sewer line segment is restricted by conditions in the gravity sewer line segment, the gravity sewer line segment shall be inspected by CCTV to determine the cause of the restriction. Richmond shall maintain a list of all gravity sewer line segments where structural conditions do not permit the passage of the device and incorporate that information in its GIS map of the Collection System. Response to the findings on the structural condition of the sewer line segment from the post-proofing CCTV inspection shall be in accordance with Attachment B or D, as appropriate. If the inability of the device to pass results from insufficient cleaning, the gravity sewer line segment shall be re-cleaned until CCTV inspection confirms that the debris, root, or FOG accumulation has been removed from the sewer line segment. In addition, the Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 21 of 126 1882
Settlement Agreement 16 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
gravity sewer line segment shall be assigned the appropriate cleaning rating as per the Cleaning Frequency Response Matrix, attached hereto as Attachment D; and, d. Detail the components of the cleaning Quality Assurance/Quality Control (“QA/QC”) program consisting of post-cleaning CCTV inspection of cleaned gravity sewer lines to ensure proper and complete cleaning of Richmond’s gravity sewers (“QA/QC inspection”) and a standardized response procedure when gravity sewer line segments fail the QA/QC inspection sufficient to address cleaning program inadequacies (i.e., identifying performance issues, providing training, increasing QA/QC inspection rates to ensure cleaning effectiveness). At least ten percent (10%) of gravity sewer segments cleaned each month shall be spot checked via CCTV inspection to ensure adequate cleaning.

A QA/QC inspection shall be considered a failure if FOG/Root/Debris accumulation are observed in the sewer segment after cleaning operations. Cleaning crews that are associated with failed QA/QC inspections shall be provided additional training in proper cleaning methods and shall be provided additional oversight in the form of increased QA/QC inspections of their cleaning operations to ensure proper and complete cleaning of Richmond’s sewers.

34. On or before March 31, 2018, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the 2018 O&M Plan. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the 2018 O&M Plan.

Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted, within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the 2018 O&M Plan as an element of Richmond’s Collection System program described in this 2018 Settlement Agreement to achieve the SSO Standards shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

35. Sewer Line Cleaning: Richmond shall clean all gravity sewer lines in Richmond’s Collection System at least once every four (4) calendar years and clean designated gravity sewer line segments more frequently as warranted by its Hot Spot Cleaning Program attached hereto as Attachment C.

36. On or before March 31, 2018, and on or before July 15 for each year thereafter during the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall complete a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of the root foaming program to prevent root related SSOs in pipes where root foaming is performed (“Root Foaming Analysis”). Based on the results of the Root Foaming Analysis, Richmond Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 22 of 126 1883
Settlement Agreement 17 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
shall modify the root foaming program to include additional pipes with observed root intrusion problems or a history of root related SSOs, or transfer funds used for root foaming to other O&M activities (e.g., increased cleaning), as needed to meet the SSO Standards.

37. On or before March 31, 2018, and on or before July 15 for each year thereafter, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the Root Foaming Analysis, including recommended program changes. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the Root Foaming Analysis. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted, within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the Root Foaming Analysis as an element of Richmond’s Collection System program described in this 2018 Settlement Agreement to achieve the SSO Standards shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

38. On or before March 31, 2018, and on an ongoing basis thereafter during the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall complete an update to the Hot Spot Cleaning List to include cleaning frequencies adequate to reduce blockage related SSOs sufficient to achieve SSO Standards (e.g., bi-monthly, monthly), and adjust cleaning frequencies based on the Cleaning Frequency Response Matrix, attached hereto as Attachment D. Adjustments to cleaning frequencies, including but not limited to, cleaning observations of “Moderate” or “Heavy” debris, roots, or FOG will result in an increase in cleaning frequency to the next highest frequency (e.g., six (6) months to three (3) months).

Adjustments to cleaning frequencies, including but not limited to, a change in cleaning observation from “Moderate” or “Heavy” after three (3) consecutive cleanings to “Clear” will result in the cleaning frequency being reduced to the next lowest cleaning frequency (e.g., three (3) months to six (6) months). No reduction in cleaning frequency for a sewer line segment with a previous history of SSOs in the past five (5) calendar years shall occur without the approval of Richmond’s Water Resource Recovery Director, except where a sewer line segment has been repaired and/or replaced, in which case, the sewer line segment can be removed from the Hot Spot Cleaning List.

39. On or before March 31, 2018, and each year thereafter for the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the updated Hot Spot Cleaning Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 23 of 126 1884
Settlement Agreement 18 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
List, including recommended program changes. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the Hot Spot Cleaning List. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments, or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted, within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the cleaning frequency to achieve the SSO Standards shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

XII. FATS, OILS, AND GREASE CONTROL

40. On or before December 31, 2017, Richmond shall continue to implement an educational outreach program to residents of Richmond (i.e., public school presentations, flyers or other public advertisements, or provision of free FOG disposal receptacles) designed to curtail the discharge of FOG from residences to Richmond’s Collection System.

41. On or before April 30, 2018, and on or before July 15 of each year thereafter, Richmond shall complete a quantitative analysis of commercial and residential FOG sources, and relative contribution to Richmond’s FOG-related SSOs (i.e., identify recalcitrant food service establishments (“FSE”), multi-unit housing, etc.).

42. On or before April 30, 2018, Richmond shall complete an update to the FOG Control Program to target the primary sources of FOG into Richmond’s Collection System including but not limited to:
a. Public outreach/education, including door hangers, mailers, refrigerator magnets, and grease scrapers, to all locations identified as sources of residential FOG to Richmond’s Collection System;
b. Perform surprise inspections and increase routine inspections at FSEs that are in areas that are primary sources of FOG to Richmond’s Collection System on a quarterly basis; and c. Inspect FSEs and FOG generating properties (e.g., schools, nursing homes, churches) at a minimum frequency of once per year.
d. Within five (5) days of completion, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs written confirmation.

Richmond shall provide the updated FOG Control Program procedures within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a written request from Plaintiffs.

43. By April 30, 2018, Richmond shall update its FOG Inspection Procedures to reduce the Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 24 of 126 1885
Settlement Agreement 19 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
timeframe for re-inspection of FSEs as follows:
• FSE receiving a score equal to or more than 3 shall be re-inspected at least once every calendar year;
• FSEs receiving a score of 2 shall be re-inspected quarterly on a surprise basis until the facility achieves a score equal to or greater than 3; and
• FSEs that receive a score of 1 shall be re-inspected at least once every month on a surprise basis until the facility achieves a score equal to or greater than 3.

FSEs shall be graded per the scoring system on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being the least compliant facilities. A “failed inspection” is one in which an FSE receives a score 1 or 2.

44. On or before April 30, 2018, Richmond staff shall propose to the City Council for incorporation into Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 12.18 the following specific procedures in response to the results of FSE inspections:
a. After one (1) failed inspection, issue Notice of Violation (“NOV”) and increase inspection per the frequency established in Paragraph 43;
b. After two (2) or more failed inspections, issue a citation and administrative fine in accordance with subsection (g) and conduct surprise inspection per the frequency established in Paragraph 43;
c. Fines escalate if the same violation occurs within 365 days as follows: $250 fine for first citation; $500 fine for second citation; and $1,000 fine for third citation. d. Within five (5) days of modification to the Richmond Municipal Code as detailed above, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs written confirmation.

45. By April 30, 2018, Richmond and Veolia shall create a procedure by which: (1) City staff conducting FSE inspections report the locations of violations to Veolia staff maintaining Richmond’s Collection System to inform the cleaning schedule; and (2) Veolia staff maintaining Richmond’s Collection System report areas with high volumes of FOG buildup to inform Richmond’s FSE inspections.

46. On or before April 30, 2018, and July 15 of each year thereafter for the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall provide Plaintiffs, in electronic format, the quantitative Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 25 of 126 1886
Settlement Agreement 20 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
analysis of commercial and residential FOG sources, including any changes to the FOG Control Program as an element of Richmond’s Collection System program described in this 2018 Settlement Agreement sufficient to achieve the SSO Standards. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt to comment on the quantitative FOG Sources analysis. Richmond shall incorporate Plaintiffs’ comments or explain in writing why Plaintiffs’ comments were not accepted, within thirty (30) days of Richmond’s receipt of the comments. Disputes as to the adequacy of the FOG sources analysis and the FOG Control Program as an element of Richmond’s Collection System program described in this 2018 Settlement Agreement to achieve the SSO Standards shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions in Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

XIII. SSO REPORTING AND RESPONSE

47. On or before March 31 of each calendar year during the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall provide Annual SSO Summary Reports to Plaintiffs. Such reports shall set forth a narrative summary, a table of SSOs for the calendar year prior, and a comparison to the SSO Standards, including that calendar year’s SSO Reduction Performance Goals. The reports shall provide the information for SSOs required by State Board Monitoring and Reporting Program, Order No. 2006-0003-DWQ, amended by Order No. WQ 2013-0058-EXEC, which includes:
a. Location of SSO by GPS coordinates (if available) or street address; b. Whether or not the SSO entered a drainage channel and/or surface water; c. Whether or not the SSO was discharged to a storm drain pipe that was not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system;
d. Estimated SSO volume in gallons;
e. Estimate of SSO volume in gallons that reached surface water, a drainage channel, or was not recovered from a storm drain;
f. Estimate of SSO volume in gallons recovered;
g. SSO source (manhole, cleanout, etc.);
h. SSO cause (mainline blockage, roots, etc.);
i. Time of SSO notification or discovery;
j. Estimated operator arrival time;
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 26 of 126 1887
Settlement Agreement 21 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
k. SSO destination;
l. Estimated SSO end time; and
m. Final SSO Identification (ID) Number.

48. For SSOs that equal or exceed one thousand (1,000) gallons, which result in a discharge to a drainage channel and/or surface water, or discharge to a storm drainpipe that was not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system, the Annual SSO Summary Reports shall include all information listed above as well as:
a. Response and corrective action taken;
b. If samples were taken, identify which regulatory agencies received sample results (if applicable). If no samples were taken, N/A must be indicated. c. Parameters that samples were analyzed for (if applicable); d. Identification of whether or not health warnings were posted; e. Beaches impacted (if applicable). If no beach was impacted, N/A must be indicated; f. Whether or not there is an ongoing investigation;
g. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the overflow and a schedule of major milestones for those steps;
h. Office of Emergency Services (“OES”) control number (if applicable); i. Date OES was called (if applicable);
j. Time OES was called (if applicable);
k. Identification of whether or not County Health Officers were called; l. Date County Health Officer was called (if applicable); and m. Time County Health Officer was called (if applicable).

49. The Annual SSO Summary Reports shall also include a summary of the capital improvements completed in Richmond’s Collection System during the calendar year, and the total cost associated with each capital expenditure. In addition, the Annual SSO Summary Reports shall include any changes to the total amount of sewer line in Richmond’s Collection System that will affect calculation of the allowable SSO Reduction Performance Goals.

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 27 of 126 1888
Settlement Agreement 22 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
XIV. SSO REDUCTION ACTION PLAN

50. If Richmond documents SSOs in excess of the SSO Reduction Performance Goals of this 2018 Settlement Agreement in its Annual SSO Summary Report, Richmond shall submit to Plaintiffs, on or before July 31 of that year, an SSO Reduction Action Plan that specifies the actions taken in the prior calendar year pursuant to this 2018 Settlement Agreement and additional measures to be taken, which are sufficient to achieve compliance with the SSO Standards in future years. The SSO Reduction Action Plan shall include a schedule for implementation of all actions proposed.

51. Plaintiffs shall provide Richmond with all recommended revisions to the SSO Reduction Action Plan within thirty (30) days of receipt of such Plan. Richmond shall indicate within thirty (30) days of receipt of Plaintiffs’ recommended revisions whether Richmond accepts any such recommendations for revision, and if so, Richmond shall within thirty (30) days revise the SSO Reduction Action Plan in accordance with Plaintiffs’ recommendations. If Richmond does not accept Plaintiffs’ recommendations, any party may seek Formal Dispute Resolution process pursuant to Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement. To the extent the Parties do not dispute original provisions or recommended revisions, Richmond shall implement all undisputed provisions or revisions. After the Parties have reached agreement on the SSO Reduction Action Plan or after Formal Dispute Resolution resolves any dispute concerning the SSO Reduction Action Plan, Richmond shall implement the SSO Reduction Action Plan as a requirement of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

52. All actions and measures discussed in an SSO Reduction Action Plan shall become enforceable requirements under this 2018 Settlement Agreement. The SSO Reduction Action Plan shall consist of a quantitative analysis of the increased level of effort for each program element described in this 2018 Settlement Agreement necessary to achieve compliance with SSO Standards. If additional funding to accomplish the program elements identified is unnecessary, then Richmond shall explain in the SSO Reduction Action Plan why it is unnecessary. If additional funding is necessary, Richmond shall seek such funding and set forth in the SSO Reduction Action Plan any potential funding sources to be used or sought. If Richmond seeks financing, but is unsuccessful, Richmond will disclose in the SSO Reduction Action Plan the extent of their efforts (e.g., copies of applications, amount sought, from whom, reasons for rejection).

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 28 of 126 1889
Settlement Agreement 23 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
XV. FEES, COSTS, EXPENSES, AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FUNDS

53. Reimbursement of Fees and Costs: To help defray Plaintiffs’ attorneys, consultants, and expert fees and costs, and any other costs incurred as a result of investigating, filing, and negotiating resolution of Plaintiffs’ Motion, Richmond shall provide to Plaintiffs a total of three hundred and ten thousand dollars ($310,000.00). The total fees and costs payment shall be made payable to “Baykeeper” addressed to 1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800, Oakland, California 94612 within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date.

54. Compliance Monitoring Funds: To compensate Plaintiffs for time spent by legal staff or technical consultants reviewing compliance reports and any other documents, Richmond shall provide to Plaintiffs thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00) in 2018 and 2019. For all other years during the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall provide to Plaintiffs fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) per year thereafter for costs and fees associated with annual monitoring of Richmond’s compliance with this 2018 Settlement Agreement through the termination date of this 2018 Settlement Agreement. The first annual compliance monitoring fund payment shall be made payable to “Baykeeper” addressed to 1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800, Oakland, California 94612 within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, and annually on or before January 1 of each following year during the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

XVI. BREACH OF AGREEMENT AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

55. Force Majeure: Richmond shall notify Plaintiffs pursuant to the terms of this Paragraph, where implementation of the requirements set forth in this 2018 Settlement Agreement, becomes impossible, despite the timely good-faith efforts of Richmond, due to circumstances beyond the control of Richmond or its agents, and which could not have been reasonably foreseen and prevented by the exercise of due diligence by Richmond. Any delays due to inadequate program funding, Richmond’s failure to make timely and bona fide applications and to exercise diligent efforts to obtain permits, or normal inclement weather shall not, in any event, be considered to be circumstances beyond Richmond’s control.
a. If Richmond claims impossibility, it shall notify Plaintiffs in writing within ten (10) days of the date that Richmond first knew of the event or circumstance or should have known of the event or Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 29 of 126 1890
Settlement Agreement 24 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
circumstance by the exercise of due diligence and shall describe the reason for the non-performance.

Richmond’s notice shall specifically refer to this Paragraph of this 2018 Settlement Agreement and describe the anticipated length of time the delay may persist, the cause or causes of the delay, the measures taken or to be taken by Richmond to prevent or minimize the delay, the schedule by which the measures will be implemented, and the anticipated date of compliance. Richmond shall adopt all reasonable measures to avoid and minimize such delays.
b. The Parties shall meet and confer in good faith concerning the non-performance and, where the Parties concur that the non-performance was or is impossible, despite the timely good faith efforts of Richmond, due to circumstances beyond the control of Richmond that could not have been reasonably foreseen and prevented by the exercise of due diligence by Richmond, new performance requirements or deadlines shall be established.
c. If Plaintiffs disagree with Richmond’s notice, or in the event that the Parties cannot timely agree on the terms of new performance deadlines or requirements, either Party shall have the right to invoke the Formal Dispute Resolution process pursuant to Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement. In such proceeding, Richmond shall bear the burden of proving that any delay of any requirement of this 2018 Settlement Agreement was caused or will be caused by force majeure and the extent of any delay attributable to such circumstances.

56. Delays due to inadequate program funding, notwithstanding the good faith efforts of Richmond to secure funding, can be the basis for extending deadlines beyond the current term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement for any additional capacity-related project identified in the SECAP prepared pursuant to this 2018 Settlement Agreement. Richmond must notify Plaintiffs as soon as possible if it believes that a delay will occur due to inadequate program funding. In the notification, Richmond shall submit to Plaintiffs all documents showing its efforts to secure adequate program funding, shall explain how Richmond intends to secure adequate program funding, and propose an alternative deadline for compliance. Plaintiffs have the right to request, and Richmond shall provide, any documents related to Richmond’s notification. The Parties shall meet and confer within ten (10) days of Richmond’s notification, unless the Parties otherwise agree on a different schedule. Plaintiffs shall consider Richmond’s request in good faith but have no obligation to modify any requirement in this Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 30 of 126 1891
Settlement Agreement 25 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
2018 Settlement Agreement due to inadequate program funding.

57. Alternative Dispute Resolution: The dispute-resolution procedure set forth below shall be the exclusive mechanism for resolving disputes between the Parties with regard to any aspect of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

58. Informal Dispute Resolution. The Parties agree to engage in Informal Dispute Resolution pursuant to the terms of this paragraph:
a. Meet and Confer: If a dispute under this 2018 Settlement Agreement arises, or any party believes that a breach of this Agreement has occurred, the Parties shall meet and confer (telephonically or in-person) within ten (10) days of receiving written notification of a request for such meeting.

During the meet and confer proceeding, the Parties shall discuss the dispute and make best efforts to devise a mutually agreed upon plan, including implementation dates, to resolve the dispute. The Parties may, upon mutual written agreement, extend the time to conduct the meet and confer discussions beyond ten (10) days.
b. If any Party fails to meet and confer within the timeframes set forth in Paragraph 58.a. or the meet and confer does not resolve the dispute, after at least ten (10) days have passed after the meet and confer occurred or should have occurred, either party shall be entitled to initiate the Formal Dispute Resolution procedures as outlined in Paragraph 59 below.

59. Formal Dispute Resolution: The Parties agree that any action or proceeding which is brought by any Party against any other Party pertaining to, arising out of, or related to the requirements of this 2018 Settlement Agreement shall first utilize the Informal Dispute Resolution procedures set forth in the preceding Paragraph, and, if not successful, the Parties shall utilize the Formal Dispute Resolution proceedings in this Paragraph. The Parties agree that Formal Dispute Resolution shall be initiated by filing a Motion to Show Cause or other appropriately named motion (“Dispute Motion”) in District Court, before Judge Chesney, to determine whether either Party is in breach of this 2018 Settlement Agreement and, if so, to require the breaching Party to remedy any breach identified by the District Court within a reasonable time frame. The party filing any such Dispute Motion may request expedited review of the Dispute Motion. If Judge Chesney is not available to perform the role identified herein, the Parties agree that the Dispute Motion shall be re-assigned pursuant to applicable Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 31 of 126 1892
Settlement Agreement 26 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
rules of the District Court. The prevailing or substantially prevailing party in the Formal Dispute Resolution proceeding shall receive its reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred in both Informal and Formal Dispute Resolution in accordance with the standard established by § 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1365.

XVII. STIPULATED PAYMENTS

60. If Richmond knows that a report will be submitted late, Richmond shall notify the Plaintiffs by telephone or email no later than two (2) business days before the report’s due date.

61. Richmond shall pay the following stipulated payments during the Term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement:
a. $500 per day after the due date that Richmond fails to timely submit any document, report, or other communication required in this 2018 Settlement Agreement; and b. $500 per day for every day after the due date that Richmond fails to timely submit any payments due under Paragraphs 53-54 of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

62. In the case of a late report, Richmond shall send Plaintiffs the report per Section XVIII.

Plaintiffs shall notify Richmond of receipt of the late report, and shall include an invoice for the amount of the stipulated payment, if any, due and payable. Richmond shall contact Plaintiffs within ten (10) business days if Richmond disagrees with Plaintiffs’ stipulated payment calculation and may meet and confer with Plaintiffs or invoke other proceedings regarding the stipulated payments pursuant to Section XVI of this 2018 Settlement Agreement. Otherwise, Richmond shall pay any stipulated payments due pursuant to this 2018 Settlement Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Plaintiffs’ invoice itemizing the stipulated payment liability.

63. All payments of stipulated payments described above shall be paid by Richmond via overnight mail to: “Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment,” 201 4th Street, Suite 102, Oakland, California 94607, Attn: Tim Little. Copies and/or notice of payment shall be sent concurrently to Plaintiffs to the addresses and via the methods set forth in Section XVIII.

XVIII. NOTICES AND SUBMISSIONS

64. Correspondence. Any notices, documents, or correspondence pertaining to this 2018 Settlement Agreement shall be, to the extent feasible sent via electronic mail transmission to the eCase 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 32 of 126 1893
Settlement Agreement 27 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
mail addresses listed below, or if electronic mail transmission is not feasible, via certified U.S. Mail with return receipt, or by hand delivery as follows:

If to Plaintiffs:

Erica A. Maharg
Nicole C. Sasaki
San Francisco Baykeeper
1736 Franklin Street, Suite 800
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 735-9700
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Daniel Cooper
Lawyers for Clean Water
1004A O’Reilly Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94129
Telephone: (415) 440-6520
Email: [email protected]
If to Richmond:

Everett Jenkins
City of Richmond, City Attorney’s Office
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Telephone: (510) 620-6509
Email: [email protected]
Ryan Smith
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Telephone: (510) 620-5846
Email: [email protected]
Nicole Granquist

DOWNEY BRAND LLP
621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 444-1000
Email: [email protected]

65. Notifications and communications shall be deemed submitted on the date transmitted via email or postmarked and sent by first-class mail or deposited with an overnight mail/delivery service.

66. Richmond also agrees to make available to Plaintiffs any documents reasonably necessary to Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 33 of 126 1894
Settlement Agreement 28 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
evaluate system performance and/or compliance with this 2018 Settlement Agreement within thirty (30) days of written request by Plaintiffs.

67. During the term of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, Richmond shall preserve at least one (1) legible copy of all records and documents, including computer-stored information, in its possession, which relate to its performance of its obligations under this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

68. Any notice, report, certification, data presentation or other document submitted by Richmond to Plaintiffs pursuant to this 2018 Settlement Agreement, which discusses, describes, demonstrates, or supports any finding or makes any representation concerning compliance or noncompliance with any requirement(s) of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, shall contain the following certification, signed by a responsible official:

I certify that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted and is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete.

XIX. MUTUAL RELEASE OF LIABILITY

69. Except for alleged violations of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, which shall be addressed in accordance with the Dispute Resolution in Section XVI above, and any failure to provide any ongoing payments as set forth in Paragraphs 54, in consideration of the above, upon the Effective Date of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, the Parties hereby fully release and covenant not to sue each other and their respective successors, assigns, officers, agents, attorneys, employees, representatives and all persons, firms, and corporations having an interest in them, from any and all claims and demands of any kind, nature, or description, and from any and all liabilities, relief, damages, fees (including fees of attorneys, experts, and others) alleged in the Motion or the underlying Complaint originally filed in this action, up to and including the Termination Date of this 2018 Settlement Agreement. This provision is applicable and will survive beyond the Termination Date of this Agreement.

70. Plaintiffs and Richmond acknowledge that they are familiar with section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.

71. Plaintiffs and Richmond hereby waive and relinquish any rights or benefits they may have Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 34 of 126 1895
Settlement Agreement 29 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
under California Civil Code section 1542 with respect to any other claims against each other arising from the allegations and claims as set forth or that could have been set forth in the Motion up to and including the Termination Date of this Agreement.

72. Nothing in this 2018 Settlement Agreement limits or otherwise affects Plaintiffs’ right to address or take any position Plaintiffs deem necessary or appropriate in any formal or informal proceeding before the Regional Board, EPA, or any other judicial or administrative body on any other matter relating to Richmond.

XX. COMMITMENTS OF PLAINTIFFS

73. Submission of 2018 Settlement Agreement to Federal Agencies: Plaintiffs shall submit this 2018 Settlement Agreement to the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency within five (5) days of full execution of the 2018 Settlement Agreement for the 45-day agency review consistent with 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. In the event that the federal agencies comment negatively on the provisions of this 2018 Settlement Agreement, the Parties agree to meet and confer to resolve the issue(s) raised by the federal agencies.

74. Stipulated Dismissal: Within five (5) days of receiving the U.S. Department of Justice’s comments on the 2018 Settlement Agreement, or if the U.S. Department of Justice does not comment on the 2018 Settlement Agreement within the prescribed 45-day period, Plaintiffs shall file with the Court a: (1) Stipulated Request for Entry of Settlement Agreement; and (2) Notice of Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order Finding Richmond in Civil Contempt of Court.

XXI. GENERAL PROVISIONS

75. Communications: In any public communications about fee increase(s) related to this 2018 Settlement Agreement, City staff shall not cite Plaintiffs or this 2018 Settlement Agreement as the sole reason for such fee increase.

76. Continuing Jurisdiction: The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of this 2018 Settlement Agreement and to resolve disputes arising hereunder as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction or execution of the 2018 Settlement Agreement up to and including the Termination Date.

77. Construction: The language in all parts of this 2018 Settlement Agreement shall be construed Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 35 of 126 1896
Settlement Agreement 30 Case No. 3:05-cv-03829 MMC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
according to its plain and ordinary meaning, except as to those terms defined in the 2013 Joint Permit, the Clean Water Act, or specifically herein.

78. Choice of Law: The laws of the United States shall govern this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

79. Severability: In the event that any provision, paragraph, section, or sentence of this 2018 Settlement Agreement is held by a Court to be unenforceable, the validity of the enforceable provisions shall not be adversely affected.

80. Counterparts: This 2018 Settlement Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one original document. Telecopy, emailed, and/or facsimile copies of original signature shall be deemed to be originally executed counterparts of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

81. Modification of the 2018 Settlement Agreement: This 2018 Settlement Agreement, and any provisions herein, may not be changed, waived, discharged, or terminated unless by a written instrument, signed by the Parties.

82. Full Settlement: This 2018 Settlement Agreement constitutes a full and final settlement of this matter.

83. Integration Clause: This is an integrated Settlement Agreement. This 2018 Settlement Agreement is intended to be a full and complete statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties and expressly supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements, covenants, representations, and warranties (express or implied) concerning the subject matter of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.

84. Authority: The undersigned representatives for Plaintiffs and Richmond each certify that he/she is fully authorized by the party whom he/she represents to enter into the terms and conditions of this 2018 Settlement Agreement.
///
///
///
///
///
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 36 of 126 1897
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 37 of 126 1898
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 38 of 126 1899
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 39 of 126 1900

ATTACHMENT A
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 40 of 126 1901
Attachment A
Sewer Line Condition Grading Matrix
Preface:

The Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (“PACP”) used by Richmond provides a mechanism for creating reliable descriptions of sewer line segment conditions. Richmond has also developed a system based on the PACP codes to assign a condition rating to sewer line segments. Requirements of the grading system were as follows:

1. The grading system should be direct and objective; and

2. Provide the ability to quantitatively measure the difference in sewer line segment between one inspection and subsequent inspections, and to prioritize among different sewer line segments.

Approach:

Using the PACP Code Matrix, each PACP defect code is assigned a condition grade from 1 to 5.

Grades are assigned based on potential for further deterioration or pipe failure. Pipe failure is defined as when the pipe can no longer convey the pipe design capacity.

Grades are assigned for two categories: (1) Structural Defects; and (2) Operating and Maintenance (“O&M”) Defects.

Grades are as follows:
5 – Immediate Attention Defects requiring immediate attention 4 - Poor Sever defects that will become Grade 5 defects within the foreseeable future
3 - Fair Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate 2 - Good Defects that have not begun to deteriorate
1 - Excellent Minor defects
The mechanisms and rates of pipeline deterioration are highly dependent on local conditions.

However, the following general guidelines are provided to estimate the amount of time before the defect causes complete line failure.
5 – Pipe has failed or will likely fail within the next five (5) years 4 – Pipe will probably fail in five (5) to ten (10) years Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 41 of 126 1902
3 – Pipe may fail in ten (10) to twenty (20) years
2 – Pipe unlikely to fail for at least twenty (20) years 1 – Failure unlikely in the foreseeable future
Grading of Continuous Defects:

The PACP continuous defect feature is used to denote where long portions of a sewer line segment are affected by the same defect, without Richmond having to repetitively enter point defects. However, to develop a grade for the sewer line segment, a mechanism is needed to translate a continuous defect into an equivalent number of point defects. The equivalent number (i.e., quantity) of “truly” and “repeating” continuous defects is calculated by dividing the length of the continuous defect by 5. For example, a 20-foot long continuous defect, Grade 3, should equate to four (4) Grade 3 defects. Fractions are rounded to the nearest whole number.

Pipe Ratings:

The pipe rating is based on the number of occurrences for each condition grade. Ratings are calculated separately for Structural Defects and O&M Defects. Several ways of expressing sewer line segment condition are used by the PACP Condition Grading System as follows:

Segment Grade Scores – Each sewer line segment will have a Segment Grade Score for each of the five (5) grades. The number of occurrences of each pipe grade is multiplied by the pipe grade to calculate the segment grade score. For example, six (6) Grade 5 defects would be 6 times 5 and equates to a Segment Grade 5 Score of 30. If a sewer line segment had no defects of a particular grade, then the Segment Grade Score for that grade would be 0.

Overall Pipe Rating – The five (5) Segment Grade Scores are added together to calculate the Overall Pipe Rating. Structural Pipe Ratings are calculated using only Structural Defect grades, while O&M Pipe Ratings are calculated using only O&M Defect grades.

PACP Quick Rating – The PACP Quick Rating is a shorthand way of expressing the number of occurrences for the two (2) highest severity grades. The PACP Quick Rating is a four character score as follows:

1. The first character is the highest severity grade occurring along the sewer line segment length.

2. The second character is the total number of occurrences of the highest severity grade. If the total number exceeds 9, then alphabetic characters are used as follows – 10 to 14 – A; 15 to 19 – B; 20 to 24 – C; etc.

3. The third character is the next highest severity grade occurring along the sewer line segment length.

4. The fourth character is the total number of the second highest severity grade occurrences, derived as in item 2 above.

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 42 of 126 1903
Examples:
4B27: 15 to 19 Grade 4 defects and seven Grade 2 defects were found. 3224: 2 Grade 3 defects and 4 Grade 3 defects were found.

If a sewer line segment only has defects of one grade, the first two characters are the grade and the quantity of defects, and the last two characters are 00 (denoting no other defect grades). A sewer line segment with no defects would have a Quick Score of 0000 (all zeros).

The PACP Quick Rating provides the ability to summarize the number and severity of defects found within a sewer line segment. As with the Pipe Rating, Quick Structural Ratings are calculated using only Structural Defect Grades, and Quick O&M Ratings are calculated using only O&M Defect Grades.

Pipe Ratings Index – The is an indicator of the distribution of defect severity. The Pipe Ratings Index is calculated by dividing the Pipe Rating by the number of defects. For example, the Structural Pipe Ratings Index would be the Structural Pipe Rating divided by the number of structural defects. Pipe Ratings Indexes are calculated for Structural, O&M, and Overall. A sewer line segment with a Pipe Rating of zero (0) would have Pipe Rating Index of zero (0).

Summary:

The following procedures are used to calculate sewer line segment ratings using the PACP Condition Grading System:

1. Determine the number of occurrences for each condition grade within the sewer line segment. Calculate separately for Structural Defect Grades and O&M Defect Grades.

2. Calculate the Segment Grade Score by multiplying the number of occurrences by the respective grade 1 through 5. Calculate the Structural Segment Grade Score and the O&M Segment Grade Score separately, then add together for the Overall Segment Grade Score.

3. Calculate the Pipe Rating for the pipe segment by adding the Segment Grade Scores.

Add all five (5) Structural Segment Grade Scores for the O&M Pipe Rating. Add all five (5) Overall Segment Grade Scores for the Overall Pipe Rating.

4. Determine the PACP Quick Rating by calculating the number of occurrences of the two (2) highest severity grades.

5. Calculate the Pipe Ratings Index by dividing the Pipe Rating by the number of defects. If the sewer line segment has no defects, the Pipe Rating Index is zero (0).

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 43 of 126 1904

ATTACHMENT B
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 44 of 126 1905
Attachment B
PACP Table
Preface:

Richmond shall use the Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (“PACP”) Table below to assess sewer line segments in Richmond’s Collection System.

PACP Table:

Observed Defect Corrective
Action
Time Frame
(from date
defect observed)
Other Action
PACP Grade 4 or 5
Maintenance Defect
Clean sewer Schedule per Hot
Spot Cleaning
Program
Place on preventive
cleaning or root
control schedule as
appropriate, or
schedule point repair
PACP Grade 3 Maintenance
Defect
Clean sewer Schedule per Hot
Spot Cleaning
Program
Place on preventive
cleaning or root
control schedule as
appropriate, or
schedule point repair
PACP Grade 5 Structural
Defect
Repair,
rehabilitate, or
reinspect sewer
Plan and
schedule
corrective action
via the City’s
Risk Assessment
Analysis
Re-inspect within one
year if corrective not
yet taken
PACP Grade 4 Structural
Defect
Repair,
rehabilitate, or
reinspect sewer
Plan and
schedule
corrective action
via the City’s
Risk Assessment
Analysis
Re-inspect within
three years if
corrective action not
yet taken
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 45 of 126 1906

ATTACHMENT C
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 46 of 126 1907
Attachment C
Hot Spot Cleaning Program
Preface:

This document outlines the identification of, and management of the “Hot Spot” Cleaning Program for Richmond’s Collection System.
“Hot Spots” are defined as a specific sewer line segment, or section of sanitary sewer line that requires more frequent maintenance due to its O&M rating (i.e., amount of, severity, and frequency of buildup of grease, roots, settled deposits, mechanical or structure defect, or other materials that interferes with the normal operation of that line). By establishing a tailored, more aggressive cleaning frequency for these trouble spots, and monitoring the ongoing condition of these lines, Richmond can prevent SSOs and unwanted interruption in adequate service.

Identification and Management of Hot Spots:

Hot Spots are identified through three (3) primary mechanisms:

1. An SSO or backup;

2. Through observations and grading using the PACP Table during CCTV inspection; and !" Field observation during regular scheduled maintenance.

After a sewer line segment has been identified for more frequent cleaning and inspection through the Hot Spot Program, it will be evaluated using both the PACP grading system, intimate knowledge of the system from Field Operations, and a risk assessment to assign a cleaning frequency.

There are five (5) main levels, dependent on the O&M severity of the sewer line segment:

1. Bi-monthly (i.e., two (2) times per month);

2. Monthly;

3. Every three (3) months;

4. Every six (6) months; and

5. Every twelve (12) months.

Pipe segments receiving a PACP Maintenance Defect score of 4 or 5 will be cleaned within 30 days and placed in the Hot Spot Cleaning Program at a 6-month cleaning frequency.

Pipe segments receiving a PACP Maintenance Defect score of 3 will be cleaned within 120 days and placed in the Hot Spot Cleaning Program at a 12-month cleaning frequency.

When a sewer line segment is determined to be put on the Hot Spot list for more frequent cleaning and observation, it will remain on that list until its condition has been observed satisfactory (i.e., not in need of more frequent cleaning) during no less than three (3) consecutive inspections while on the Hot Spot Program.

Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 47 of 126 1908

ATTACHMENT D
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 48 of 126 1909
Attachment D
Cleaning Frequency Response Matrix
Clear Light Moderate Heavy
Debris ¼ Debris Trap
Volume/500
Linear Feet
(LF) or less
1 pass
½ Debris Trap
Volume/500
LF
2 passes
¾ Debris Trap
Volume/500 LF
3 passes
1 full Debris Trap or
Greater
Operator concern for
future stoppage
4 or more passes
Grease ¼ Debris Trap
Volume/500
LF
1 pass
½ Debris Trap
Volume/500
LF
15 minutes or
less to clean
2 passes
¾ Debris Trap
Volume/500 LF
15-30 minutes to
clean
3 passes
1 full Debris Trap or
Greater
Operator concern for
future stoppage
4 or more passes
Roots ¼ Debris Trap
Volume/500
LF
1 pass
½ Debris Trap
Volume/500
LF
2 passes
¾ Debris Trap
Volume/500 LF
3 passes
1 full Debris Trap or
Greater
Operator concern for
future stoppage
4 or more passes
Debris:

Structural
sewer line
fragments,
soil, rock,
etc.

No observable
materials
Minor amount
of material
(specify type
of material if
possible)
Moderate
amount of
material (specify
type of material
if possible) per
sewer line
segment
Significant amount of
material (specify type of
material if possible) per
sewer line segment
Operator concern for
future stoppage
Action Decrease
frequency to
next lower
frequency
after three (3)
consecutive
results (e.g., 6
months to 12
months)
Continue
current
maintenance
frequency
Increase current
maintenance
frequency to
next higher
frequency (e.g.,
6 months to 3
months)
Increase current
maintenance frequency
to next higher frequency
(e.g., 6 months to 3
months)
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 49 of 126 1910

ATTACHMENT E
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 50 of 126 1911
Condition Assessment of
Wastewater Collection Systems

WHITE PAPER
Office of Research and Development
National Risk Management Research Laboratory - Water Supply and Water Resources Division EPA/600/R-09/049 | May 2009 | www.epa.gov/nrmrl Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 51 of 126 1912
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Research
and Development
Washington, DC 20460
Final Report
May 2009
EPA/600/R-09/049
White Paper on
Condition Assessment of
Wastewater Collection
Systems
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 52 of 126 1913
White Paper on
Condition Assessment of Wastewater Collection
Systems
by
Christopher S. Feeney
The Louis Berger Group, Inc.

Scott Thayer
Redzone Robotics, Inc.

Michael Bonomo
ADS Environmental Services, LLC
Kathy Martel, P.E.

The Cadmus Group
Contract No. EP-C-05-058
Task Order No. 59
Task Order Manager
Dr. Fu-hsiung (Dennis) F. Lai
Water Supply and Water Resources Division
2890 Woodbridge Avenue (MS-104)
Edison, NJ 08837
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 53 of 126 1914
Disclaimer
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development, funded and managed, and collaborated in the research described herein. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency, therefore, no official endorsement should be inferred. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
ii
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 54 of 126 1915
Contents
Disclaimer ii
Contents iii
List of Figures v
List of Tables v
Symbols and Acronyms vi
Executive Summary 1

1.0 Overview of Task Order 59 1-1

1.1 Project Background 1-1

1.2 Purpose and Scope 1-1

1.3 Definition of Terms 1-2

1.4 Critical Gaps in Inspection Technologies and Condition Assessment 1-3

1.4.1 Gravity Line Inspection 1-4

1.4.2 Pressure Line/Force Main Inspection 1-4

1.4.3 Condition Assessment Protocols 1-4

1.5 Research Questions 1-4

2.0 Condition Assessment 2-6

2.1 Program Development 2-7

2.2 Asset Inspection 2-8

2.2.1 Selection of Assets for Inspection 2-8

2.2.2 Prioritization of Assets 2-9

2.2.3 Asset Inspection 2-9

2.3 Data Management 2-9

2.3.1 Condition Assessment/Asset Management Software 2-9

2.3.2 General Database Management Software 2-10

2.3.3 Spreadsheet Software 2-10

2.4 Data Analysis 2-10

2.4.1 Hydraulic Capacity/Hydraulic Restrictions 2-10

2.4.2 Structural Condition 2-11

2.5 Decision Making 2-13

3.0 Dynamics of Wastewater Collection System Failure 3-16

3.1 Failure Mechanisms 3-16

3.1.1 Hydraulic Restrictions 3-16

3.1.2 Hydraulic Capacity 3-16

3.1.3 Structural Failure 3-17

3.2 Pipe Defects 3-18

3.3 Correlations between Assessed Conditions and Performance Measures 3-19 Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 55 of 126 1916

4.0 Inspection Technologies 4-21

4.1 Camera Inspection 4-22

4.1.1 Zoom Camera Inspection 4-23

4.1.2 Digital Scanning 4-25

4.1.3 Camera Deployment 4-27

4.2 Acoustic Technologies 4-30

4.2.1 Leak Detectors 4-31

4.2.2 Acoustic Monitoring Systems 4-33

4.2.3 Sonar and Ultrasonic Testing 4-34

4.3 Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods 4-35

4.3.1 Electrical Leak Location Method 4-36

4.3.2 Eddy Current Testing and Remote Field Eddy Current Technology 4-37

4.3.3 Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection 4-40

4.4 Laser Profiling 4-41

4.5 Flow Meters 4-42

4.6 Innovative Technologies 4-43

4.6.1 Gamma-Gamma Logging 4-43

4.6.2 Ground Penetrating Radar 4-44

4.6.3 Infrared Thermography 4-44

4.6.4 Micro-Deflection 4-45

4.6.5 Impact Echo/Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) 4-45

4.6.6 Ultrasonic Testing Systems 4-45

5.0 Technology Forum Summary 5-46

5.1 Background 5-46

5.2 General Discussion 5-46

5.3 Critical Gaps Identified in State of the Science 5-47

5.4 Recommended Next Steps 5-48

6.0 References 6-50
Appendix A A-1
Camera Technologies A-2
Acoustic Technologies A-5
Electrical and Electromagnetic Products A-7
Laser Products A-9
iv
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 56 of 126 1917
List of Figures
Figure 2-1: Condition Assessment 2-6
Figure 5-1: Technology Forum Attendees 5-49
List of Tables
Table ES-1: Summary of Emerging and Innovative Technologies ES-4 Table 2-1: Condition Assessment Matrix 2-15
Table 3-1: Most Common Pipe Defects Identified 3-19
Table 4-1: Inspection Technology Overview 4-21
Table 4-2: Zoom Camera Inspection Summary 4-24
Table 4-3: Digital Camera Scanning Inspection Summary 4-26 Table 4-4: Pushcam Product Comparison 4-28
Table 4-5: Lateral Launcher Product Comparison 4-29
Table 4-6: Small Diameter Tractor Product Comparison 4-29 Table 4-7: Long Range Tractor Product Comparison 4-29
Table 4-8: Acoustic Technology Summary 4-31
Table 4-9: Sonar Product Comparison 4-35
Table 4-10: Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods Summary 4-36 Table 4-11: MFL Product Comparison 4-41
Table 4-12: Laser Profiling Summary 4-41
v
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 57 of 126 1918
Symbols and Acronyms
2D Two dimensional
3D Three dimensional
A Access point
ACI American Concrete Institute
AET Acoustic emission testing
AwwaRF American Water Works Association Research Foundation (now Water Research Foundation)
B Broken
BEM Broadband electromagnetic methodology
BW Brick work
C Crack
CARE-S Computer Aided Rehabilitation Program for Sewers CCTV Closed-Circuit Television
CDMA Code Division Multiple Access
CMOM Capacity, Management, Operation and Maintenance
CWA Clean Water Act
D Deformed or deposits
DVD Digital video discs
ECT Eddy current testing
EDGE Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
F Fracture
FELL Focused Electrode Leak Location System
FL Longitudinal fracture
FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
ft. feet
GIS Geographic Information System
gpm gallons per minute
gpm/in-mile gallons per minute per inch diameter per mile length GPR Ground penetrating radar
GPRS General Packet Radio Service
GPS Global positioning system
H Hole
HDPE high density polyethylene
HSV Hole with visible soil
I Infiltration
I/I Inflow and infiltration
in. inches
vi
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 58 of 126 1919
IP internet protocol
IRT Infrared thermography
IS Intruding seal material
J Joint
KPI Key performance indicator
L Line
LED Light-emitting diode
LF Lining failure
M Miscellaneous
MACP Manhole Assessment Certification Program
MCU Camera underwater
MFL Magnetic flux leakage
NA Not applicable
NACWA National Association of Clean Water Agencies
NASSCO National Association of Sewer Service Companies
OB Obstacles
O&M Operations and Maintenance
ORD Office of Research and Development
PACP Pipeline Assessment Certification Program
PCCP Pre-stressed concrete cylinder pipe
PR Point repair
psi pounds per square inch
PTZ Pan-Tilt-Zoom
PVC Polyvinyl chloride
R Roots
RCP Reinforced concrete pipe
RFEC Remote field eddy current
RFEC/TC Remote field eddy current/transformer coupling
S Surface damage
SASW Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SCRAPS Sewer Cataloging, Retrieval, and Prioritization System Sonar Sound navigation and ranging
SSET Sewer scanning evaluation technology
SSO Sanitary sewer overflow
T Tap
TC Transformer coupling
U.S. United States of America
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VCP Vitrified clay pipe
V Vermin
vii
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 59 of 126 1920
VR Vermin including rats
WEF Water Environment Federation
WERF Water Environment Research Federation
WF Weld failure
WRc Water Research Centre (United Kingdom)
X Collapse
viii
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 60 of 126 1921
Executive Summary
In 2007, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) finalized a research program entitled “Innovation and Research for Water Infrastructure for the 21st Century” that will generate the science and engineering knowledge needed to improve and evaluate innovative technologies to reduce the cost while improving the effectiveness of operation, maintenance, and replacement of aging and failing drinking water and wastewater treatment and conveyance systems (USEPA, 2007). Task Order 59, Condition Assessment of Wastewater Collection Systems, is one of several projects being conducted under this research initiative.

Overview
The objectives of Task Order 59 are to comprehensively review condition assessment technologies and to investigate condition assessment approaches for wastewater collection systems. Specific project objectives include:
x Identify and characterize the state of condition assessment technology for wastewater collection systems.
x Research and evaluate performance and cost of innovative and advanced infrastructure monitoring technologies including wireless and remote sensing approaches developed in other industries and their applicability to wastewater collection sewers. x Identify and evaluate innovative closed-circuit television (CCTV) technologies currently used by more advanced wastewater utilities for transfer to utilities at large. x Prepare protocols, metrics, and site selection criteria for field demonstration of selected innovative condition assessment technologies and decision-support systems.

This White Paper is one of the first work products created under Task Order 59 and was used as a basis for discussions at the project’s Technology Forum in September 2008. The White Paper summarizes the current state of condition assessment technologies, reviews mechanisms of pipe failure, discusses emerging and innovative technologies for sewer inspection, and presents a summary of the Technology Forum. It incorporates feedback received at the Technology Forum.

Condition Assessment
The primary components of any asset management program include the identification, location, and condition of assets. Condition assessment provides the critical information needed to assess the physical condition and functionality of a wastewater collection system, and to estimate remaining service life and asset value. After the field inspection, pipe defects are classified using a standard coding system and pipe condition is assessed using a systematic method to produce consistent, useful information. Following data analysis, condition assessment information is used to make estimates of a pipe’s remaining useful life and its long-term performance, and to make decisions about pipe rehabilitation, pipe replacement and/or further inspections.

Dynamics of Wastewater System Failure
In conducting condition assessment, it is important to understand the dynamics of pipe failure including the level, type, and severity of a failure mechanism. Failure can be a sudden, catastrophic collapse of a pipe, restricted hydraulic capacity, or a variety of other performance conditions that result in the inability of the pipe to perform as necessary for the minimum acceptable level of operation of the system. The purpose of condition assessment is to detect pipe defects which indicate the likelihood of pipe failure, as well as to assess the collection system’s performance. This section discusses the mechanisms of pipe failure, the various types of pipe defects, and the relationship between the condition of a pipe and its Page ES-1
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 61 of 126 1922
performance. It is important to understand that the mechanisms and impacts of pipe failure are highly dependent upon the pipe material and type of sewer (i.e. force main, gravity line).

Inspection Technologies
There are a variety of technologies available for assessment of collection systems. These technologies, summarized in Table ES-1, include:
x CCTV is a well-established and common industry method used for inspecting pipes. It provides visual data on leaks, location of service laterals, and sediment and debris accumulation. The primary disadvantages to CCTV technology are that it only provides a view of the pipe surface above the waterline; it does not provide any structural data on the pipe wall integrity; and it does not provide a view of the soil envelope supporting the pipe.

For inspections of gravity lines, basic CCTV systems are not able to measure slope. There are needs for higher resolution cameras with better lighting; and improvements in crawler technology to better negotiate obstructions, grease, and off-set joints. The quality of defect identification and pipe condition assessment using CCTV is highly dependent on many factors including operator interpretation, picture quality, and flow level. Innovative camera technologies include zoom cameras, digital inspection, push cameras, and advances in crawler technology.
x Acoustic technologies use measuring devices to detect vibrations and/or sound waves. In pipeline assessment, acoustic sensors are used to detect signals emitted by defects. Three types of acoustic technologies are used for pipeline assessment: leak detectors, which are used to detect the acoustic signals emitted by pipeline leaks; acoustic monitoring systems, which are used to evaluate the condition of pre-stressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP) by detecting the signals emitted by breaking pre-stressed wires; and sonar, or ultrasonic systems, which emit high frequency sound waves and measure their reflection in order to detect a variety of pipe defects.
x Electrical/Electromagnetic currents are the basis of several sewer evaluation techniques.

The electrical leak location method is used to detect leaks in surcharged non-ferrous pipes.

Eddy Current Testing (ECT) and Remote Field Eddy Current (RFEC) technology identify defects in ferrous pipes. Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) inspection is widely used in the oil and gas industry to measure metal loss and detect cracks in ferrous pipelines. x Laser profiling uses a laser to create a line of light around the pipe wall, highlighting the shape of the sewer. This technique allows for the detection of changes to the pipe’s shape, which may be caused by deformation, corrosion, or siltation. Laser inspection can only be used to inspect the portions of a pipe wall that are above the water line. To assess the entire internal surface of a pipeline requires the pipe to be taken out of service. Lasers are often used in combination with other inspection methods, most commonly CCTV and/or sonar. x Innovative methods based on a variety of technologies are currently being developed for the evaluation of sewer collection systems. Gamma-gamma logging is a technique used primarily to evaluate cast-in-place concrete pilings and can provide information on the average bulk density of the concrete and the location of voids. Ground Penetrating Radar can detect underground voids, and is potentially useful for examination of pipe bedding and to locate leaks. Infrared Thermography involves the use of an infrared camera to measure the temperature differential across an object and is a potential method of detecting sewer defects such as leaks and voids. Micro-Deflection is a nondestructive technology used to evaluate general conditions and joint integrity of brick, concrete, and clay structures using a load to create a slight deformation or micro-deflection in the test material. Impact Echo and Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) are acoustic wave techniques for locating and measuring cracks, delaminations, voids, and honeycombing in concrete and masonry.

Page ES-2
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 62 of 126 1923
Summary of Technology Forum
A technology forum was held on September 11 and 12, 2008 in Edison, New Jersey to discuss the state of the science for condition assessment of wastewater collection systems and to identify critical gaps in current knowledge. A draft of the White Paper was distributed to participants in advance of the meeting and served as a basis for forum discussions. The objective of the forum was to present the findings of the research and obtain direction for additional research and further evaluation during the field demonstration tasks. The forum included discussions on data needs for conducting condition assessment and making asset management decisions; use of flow monitoring for asset management; systematic approaches to condition assessment; the importance of understanding the mechanisms of pipe failure; and tools and models available for conducting risk-based decision making related to wastewater assets.

Critical gaps in our knowledge of inspection technologies, and our ability to diagnose and predict infrastructure failures were identified at the Technology Forum and summarized below.

1. Research is needed to further define the costs and benefits of pipe inspection and rehabilitation as part of a utility’s condition assessment program. Methods of determining the impact of deteriorating collection systems on municipal budgets are needed.

2. Inspection technologies need to be identified for the following applications:
a. Reduce use of confined space entry during sewer system inspections and investigations. b. Affordable inspection technology that utilizes multi-sensor devices on a small transportable package.
c. Inspecting pipes below the waterline.
d. Inspecting force mains that are in service.
e. Inspecting laterals.

3. Data management methods and models are available, but a lack of data standardization makes it difficult to compare historical data collected with different inspection technologies that have proprietary data structures.

4. Research is needed to improve how asset condition is tracked over time. Geospatial information (with a high degree of accuracy) needs to be collected along with pipe condition data in order to link historical inspection data with an exact physical location.

Information transfer to practitioners was identified as a critical industry need. Practitioners need training on topics such as infrastructure failure mechanisms; using historical inspection data for condition assessment applications; applying the Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP) coding system to characterize pipe defects; developing a condition assessment program; and preparing accurate record drawings for new and rehabilitated pipe. In addition, practitioners need simple condition assessment tools (i.e. scattergraphs for analyzing flow data, decision trees, rules of thumb).

Page ES-3
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 63 of 126 1924
Table ES-1: Summary of Emerging and Innovative Technologies Technology
CCTV Acoustic Electrical & Electro-magnetic Lase r Innovative Technologies Conventional
Zoom camera
Digital scanning
Push-camera inspection
In-line leak detectors
Acoustic monitoring
systems
Sonar/ultrasonic
Electrical leak location
Remote field eddy current
Magnetic flux leakage
Laser profiling
Gamma-gamma logging
Ground penetrating radar
Infrared thermography
Micro-deflection
Impact echo/SASW
ApplicationPipe type G G G S G, F F G, F G, F, S G,F,S G,F,S G, F G,F,S G,F,S G,F,S G G Pipe material Any Any Any Any Any PCCP Any NF F F, PCCP Any C Any Any B B, C Pipe size >6” >6” 6”-60” 1”- 12” >4” >18” >2” >3” >2” 2”-56” > 4” Not yet defined Not yet defined Not yet defined Not yet defined >6’ Defects Detected Sediment, debris, roots Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ
Pipe sags & deflections Ɣ Ɣ Partial Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ
External pits & voids Ɣ Ɣ Partial Ɣ
Corrosion & metal loss Partial Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ ƔOff-set joints Ɣ Ɣ Partial Ɣ Pipe cracks Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ
Leaks Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ ƔBroken pre-stressed wires Ɣ ƔWall thickness Ɣ ƔService connections Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ ƔBedding condition Ɣ ƔBedding voids Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Partial Deteriorated insulation Ɣ
Overall condition Ɣ
Pipe type: G – Gravity line F – Force main S – Service lateral Pipe material: NF – Nonferrous F – Ferrous B – Brick C – Concrete PCCP – Pre-stressed concrete cylinder pipe Page ES-4
Case 3:05-cv-03829-MMC Document 57 Filed 06/04/18 Page 64 of 126 1925

1.0 Overview of Task Order 59
In 2007, USEPA finalized a research program entitled “Innovation and Research for Water Infrastructure for the 21st Century” that is being implemented by the Office of Research and Development. It will generate the science and engineering knowledge needed to improve and evaluate innovative technologies to reduce the cost while improving the effectiveness of operation, maintenance, and replacement of aging and failing drinking water and wastewater treatment and conveyance systems (USEPA, 2007). Task Order 59, Condition Assessment of Wastewater Collection Systems, is one of several projects being conducted under this research initiative.

1.1 Project Background
In 2002, the USEPA Office of Water published a report entitled “Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure Gap Analysis” (USEPA, 2002). The Gap Analysis report identified a critical shortfall in funding of the nation’s water and wastewater infrastructure including a $270 billion gap for wastewater infrastructure for the years 2000-2019. The deferred maintenance approach to operating and maintaining the nation’s aging wastewater infrastructure has become a paramount concern of the Agency.

Failing wastewater infrastructure can pose a significant threat to public health and the environment.

Wastewater infrastructure may include sanitary and combined sewer components, but this project is focused only on sanitary sewer systems. Systems with inadequate hydraulic capacity and/or blockages may lead to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and may cause flooding damage to private property or release untreated sewage to receiving waters. Some of the health hazards associated with basement flooding by untreated wastewater include the potential presence of pathogenic microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, and protozoa.

USEPA and State regulators have taken legal action against utility districts for property damage and SSOs. For example, in 2005, a settlement of $300 million was reached with the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission to implement a program to reduce occurrences of basement flooding. This joint settlement was reached among the utility district, USEPA, State of Maryland, and five local citizens groups. In 2004, Knoxville Utility Board reached a settlement with the State of Tennessee for a capital improvements program of $350 million to eliminate flooding due to hydraulic restrictions. In 2004, Hamilton, Ohio reached a settlement to implement a program to eliminate SSOs and basement flooding that was estimated to cost approximately $1.5 billion.

1.2 Purpose and Scope
The objectives of Task Order 59 are to comprehensively review condition assessment technologies and to investigate condition assessment approaches for wastewater collection systems. The primary goal of the project is to develop more efficient and cost-effective means to conduct condition assessment and to use the information as part of a risk-based asset management approach to planning. Specific project objectives include:
x Identify and characterize the state of condition assessment technology for wastewater collection systems.
x Research and evaluate performance and cost of innovative and advanced infrastructure monitoring technologies including wireless and remote sensing approaches developed in other industries and their applicability to wastewater collection sewers. x Identify and evaluate innovative CCTV technologies currently used by more advanced wastewater utilities for transfer to utilities at large.

Page 1 ends

Richmond City CouncilJune 16, 2026

Richmond City Council
June 16, 2026