South Lake Tahoe City Council
March 24, 2026

SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
Lake Tahoe Airport
South Lake Tahoe, California
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
This is an Appendix attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference with the Professional Services Agreement dated February 1, 2022, between the City of South Lake Tahoe and Jviation, a Woolpert Company for providing professional services. For the remainder of this scope the Lake Tahoe Airport is indicated as “Sponsor” and Jviation, a Woolpert Company is indicated as “Engineer.” The construction budget for this project is approximately $500,000.00. This construction budget does not include administrative, legal, or professional fees.

This project shall consist of preparing Construction Plans, Contract Documents, Technical Specifications, and Engineer’s Design Report, along with Bidding, Construction Administration, Post-Construction Coordination, On-Site Construction Coordination, for the Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance Project.

This scope of work is for the consulting services provided by the Engineer for the Sponsor. See Exhibit No. 1 below for the project location.

EXHIBIT NO. 1

DESCRIPTION
This project shall consist of asphalt pavement maintenance activities on Runway 18/36, and the runway blast pads. The proposed maintenance for these asphalt pavement areas includes the routing and filling of cracks greater than ¼” inch in width with crack sealant, application of an asphalt-based surface treatment, and application of pavement markings. The proposed periodic maintenance will mitigate pavement cracking and provide a surface treatment resistant to UV rays, water and oxidation. The purpose of this project is to extend the existing runway pavement’s useful life.

Runway 18/36 was initially constructed in the 1950s and last reconstructed in 2008. A 2017 Pavement Evaluation Study determined a PCI = 81 (very good), while the most recent 2023 pavement inspection determined a PCI = 72 (good). Previous pavement maintenance records are not available. The runway project area will be maintenance along 131,000 square yards of asphalt pavement. 152
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

The engineering fees for this project will be broken into two parts. Part A-Basic Services includes; 1) Preliminary Design Phase, 2) Design Phase, 3) Bidding Phase, and Reimbursable Costs During Design and Bidding and Part B-Special Services, which includes; 4) Construction Administration Phase, 5) PostConstruction Coordination Phase, 6) On-Site Construction Coordination Phase or Field Engineering, and Reimbursable Costs During Construction. Parts A and B and the six phases are described in more detail below.

PART A - BASIC SERVICES consists of the Preliminary Design Phase, Design Phase, and Bidding Phase, all invoiced on a lump sum basis.

1.0 Preliminary Design Phase

1.01 Coordinate and Attend Meetings with the Sponsor and FAA. Meetings with the Sponsor and the FAA will take place to determine critical project dates, establish the proposed design schedule and AIP development schedule, review environmental component(s), determine the feasibility of the proposed project and to establish the need for topographical surveying, pavement investigation and/or geotechnical testing. Various meetings during the design phase will also be conducted to review the progress of the design, discuss construction details and proposed time frame of construction and identify any special requirements for the project.

1.02 Prepare Project Scope of Work and Contract. This task includes establishing the scope of work through meetings outlined above. Fees will be negotiated with the Sponsor and may be subject to an independent fee estimate conducted by a third party hired by the Sponsor. This task also includes drafting the contract for the work to be completed by the Engineer for the Sponsor once negotiations are complete.

1.03 Prepare Preliminary Cost Estimating. This task includes creating a preliminary construction rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimate, a preliminary working days estimate, a preliminary overall project schedule, and a preliminary overall project budget. The preliminary construction ROM cost estimate will be based upon the most current information available at the time of preparation. Work to refine these estimates is included under Task 2.08.

1.04 Provide Project Coordination. The Engineer shall provide project management and coordination services to ensure the completion of the design. These duties include:
 Time the Engineer spends planning, organizing, securing and scheduling resources, and providing instruction to staff to meet project objectives as defined in the approved scope of work.
 The Engineer will analyze the budget semi-monthly to ensure budget and staffing needs are on track to meet design schedules within budget.
 Additional items to be accomplished include compiling and sending additional information requested from the office to related parties, maintaining project files as necessary and other items necessary in day-to-day project coordination.
 The Engineer will prepare and submit monthly invoicing. 153
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

The Engineer will complete the following tasks:
 Provide the Sponsor with a monthly Project Status Report (PSR), in writing, reporting on Engineer’s progress and any problems that may arise while performing the work. The PSR must include an update of the project schedule, as described in this section, when schedule changes are expected.
 Submit for acceptance and maintain, a design schedule detailing the scheduled performance of the work.
 Create and maintain a Quality Control Checklist (QCC) for the project. The QCC shall include personnel, project milestone checking and peer review procedures at each phase of the project.

1.05 Review Existing Documents. The Engineer will gather and review existing available documentation that may be relevant to the project, including, but not limited to, record drawings (as-builts), design reports, final reports, utility reports/maps and previous surveys. The Engineer may use relevant information from this review to coordinate the design and topographical survey for the project

1.06 Prepare State Grant Application. This task consists of preparing the state grant application.

Preparation of the application includes the following:
 Prepare state grant application on the CALTRANS Aeronautics website.  Prepare Project Financial Information.
 Prepare Project Sketch (11” x 17”).

The completed grant application will be saved on the CALTRANS Aeronautics website for the Sponsor to review. Once the Sponsor approves the grant application, the Sponsor will submit the grant application on the CALTRANS Aeronautics website.

1.07 Prepare Federal Grant Application. This task consists of preparing the federal grant application. The application will be submitted during the initial portion of the project. Preparation of the application includes the following:
 Prepare Federal 424 form.
 Prepare Federal Form 5100 – II thru IV.
 Prepare project funding summary.
 Prepare program narrative, discussing the purpose and need of the work and the method of accomplishment.
 Project sketch (8.5” x 11”).
 Include preliminary cost estimate.
 Include the existing Exhibit “A” Property Map.
 Include the Sponsor’s certifications.
 Attach the current grant assurances.
 Include DOT Title VI assurances.
 Include certification for contract, grants and cooperative agreements.  Include Title VI pre-award checklist.
 Include current FAA advisory circulars required for use in AIP funded projects.

The Engineer shall submit the grant application to the Sponsor for approval and signatures. After obtaining the necessary signatures, the Sponsor or Engineer shall forward a copy of the signed application to the FAA for further processing.
154
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

1.08 Prepare Environmental Documentation. The FAA has determined that a simple written Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) applies to the project according to FAA order 1050.1G. The Engineer shall prepare a simple written CATEX for the project. An overall environmental exhibit, if applicable, will be created as part of this scope of work, approved by the FAA, and referenced throughout the project.

TASK 1 DELIVERABLES TO FAA/STATE TO SPONSOR

1.01 Meeting Agendas, AIP Development Schedule and Meeting Minutes from Pre-Design Meeting
 

1.02 Scope of Work and Draft Contract for the Sponsor 

1.03 Preliminary Cost Estimate 

1.04 Design Schedule, PSR, and Monthly Invoicing 

1.06 State Grant Application  

1.07 Federal Grant Application  

1.08 Environmental Documentation  
TASK 1 MEETINGS/SITE VISITS LOCATION/ATTENDEES/DURATION

1.01 Pre-Design Meeting. • South Lake Tahoe, CA
One (1) Project Engineer and one (1) Program Director
Assume One (1) hour via teleconference (3 meetings)

2.0 Design Phase

2.01 Prepare Preliminary Contract Documents. This task includes preparing the Preliminary Contract Documents, including Contract Proposal, Bid Bond, Contractor Information Sheet, Subcontractor/Material Supplier List, Buy America Certification, Buy America Waiver Request, Buy America Conformance Listing, Bid Proposal, Contract, Payment Bond, Performance Bond, Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed, Notice of Contractor’s Settlement, General Provisions, FAA AC 150/5370-2 (Current Edition), Operational Safety on Airports During Construction, and Wage Rates. The wage rates will be updated at the time of advertisement to reflect the most current wage rates available. Preparation will include establishing the location for the bid opening, dates for advertisement and description of the work schedule. Also included in the Preliminary Contract Documents, and covered under separate tasks below, are the Construction Safety and Phasing Plan, Technical Specifications, and Special Provisions. Preliminary Contract Documents will be prepared as early as possible during the design phase and submitted to the Sponsor for review.

2.02 Prepare Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP). This task includes meeting with the Sponsor to discuss the current operations of the airport to assist in determining how the proposed construction phasing of the project will affect these operations. From these meetings, a complete Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP) will be developed to ensure safety compliance when coordinating construction activities and airport operations. The CSPP will be developed in accordance with the requirements of FAA AC 150/5370-2 (Current Edition), Operational Safety on Airports During Construction. A construction phasing plan that meets the requirements of the AC and operational needs of the airport will be developed and included in the Contract Documents. This plan will also identify any nighttime work, continuous working times, or other unusual conditions that could affect the Contractor’s normal progress on the project. The draft CSPP will be submitted at 30% complete and at 90% complete for ADO review. Upon preliminary approval from the ADO, the CSPP will be submitted to FAA for OE/AAA coordination. 155
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

2.03 Prepare Preliminary Construction Plans. This task includes preparing the following list of construction plans for the project. Additional plans may be added during the design phase as needed:

Plan Name/Description Number of Sheets
Cover Sheet 1
Index of Drawings, Summary of Approximate Quantities and General Notes 2 Safety Plan 1
Construction Layout Plan 1
Construction Phasing Plan 3
Environmental Requirements and Details 1
Seal Coat and Crack Seal Plan 1
Pavement Marking Plan 5
Pavement Marking Details 2
Total Sheet Count 17

2.04 Prepare Preliminary Technical Specifications. This task includes assembling the technical specifications necessary for the project. Standard FAA specifications will be utilized where possible, with the guidance from FAA AC 150/5370-10 (Current Edition), Standard Specifications for Construction of Airports. Additional specifications will be prepared to address work items for materials that are not covered by the standard FAA specifications. The standard specifications to be utilized shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
 Item C-105 Mobilization
 Item P-101 Preparation/Removal of Existing Pavements
 Item P-605 Joint Sealants for Pavements
 Item P-608 Emulsified Asphalt Seal Coat
 Item P-620 Runway and Taxiway Marking

2.05 Prepare Preliminary Special Provisions. This task includes preparing the preliminary Special Provisions to address, or expound on, site conditions that require additional clarification. These include, but are not limited to: Haul Roads, Airport Security, Radio Communications, Work Schedule, Contractor’s Quality Control Program, Sequencing of the Work, Closure of Air Operations Areas, Accident Prevention, Underground Cables/Utilities, Insurance, Indemnification, Sales and Use Taxes, Permits and Compliance with Laws, Executed Contracts, Subletting or Assigning of Contracts, and Liquidated Damages.

2.06 Compile/Submit FAA Form 7460. This task includes preparing and submitting the required FAA Form 7460-1, “Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration,” via the FAA’s online Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) system on the Sponsor’s behalf. The Engineer will reference FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-20 (Current Edition), Submission of On-Airport Proposals for Aeronautical Study, and coordinate with the FAA Project Manager and/or Airspace Specialist to determine the locations of required airspace case studies to be submitted. Generally, such cases are required for any restrictive/critical points where construction operations or proposed alterations may affect navigable airspace. Typically, these locations include (but are not limited to): limits of construction, construction phasing limits, haul routes for construction traffic, asphalt and/or concrete batch plants, and key points of any permanent, above-ground alterations. The Engineer will prepare an exhibit depicting the locations and other information pertinent to the cases’ impact on the airspace to include with the submission. The Engineer will submit FAA Form 7460-1 and the associated documentation to the FAA via the OE/AAA system for approval a minimum of 45 days prior to the start of construction. 156
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

2.07 Calculate Estimated Quantities. This task includes calculating all necessary quantities for the various work items. Quantities must be consistent with the specifications and acceptable quantity calculation practices.

2.08 Prepare Estimate of Probable Construction Cost. Using the final quantities calculated following the completion of the construction plans and specifications, the Engineer will prepare the construction cost estimate. The estimate will be based on information obtained from previous projects, contractors, material suppliers and other available databases.

2.09 Prepare Engineer’s Design Report. This task includes preparation of the Engineer’s Design Report in accordance with current FAA Western-Pacific Region Engineer’s Design Report guidelines. The Engineer’s Design Report will include a detailed summary of the project, photographs and descriptions of existing site conditions, estimate of project costs, and a schedule for the completion of the design, bidding, and construction. The Engineer’s Design Report will also contain any alternative design concepts that were investigated and evaluated.

2.10 Review Plans at 30%, and 90% Complete. During various stages of completion of the design, the Engineer will submit a set of Construction Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents to the Sponsor for their review. Meetings will be scheduled for periodic reviews, including a 90% plans-in-hand review.

The project will be reviewed with the FAA to obtain their concurrence with the design.

2.11 Provide In-House Quality Control. The Engineer has an established quality control program that will provide both experienced and thorough reviews of all project submittals and will also provide engineering guidance to the design team throughout design development from an experienced, senior-level Professional Engineer.

Prior to each review set of Construction Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents, and Engineer’s Design Report being submitted to the Sponsor and FAA, a thorough, in-house quality control review of the documents will be conducted. This process will include an independent review of the Construction Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents, and Engineer’s Design Report being submitted by a licensed Professional Engineer other than the Engineer who performed the design of the project. Comments will be offered by the Engineer that performed the review, and revisions to the Construction Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents, and Engineer’s Design Report will be made accordingly.

In addition to the 30%, and 90% reviews, the Engineer’s in-house quality control program also provides engineering guidance to the design team throughout the project design in an attempt to steer the project in a manner that provides the best engineering judgment.

At the 90% design review, the independent review will re-evaluate the CATEX boundary.

2.12 Prepare and Submit Construction Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents, and Engineer’s Design Report. A final set of Construction Plans (11” x 17”), Specifications, Contract Documents, and the Engineer’s Design Report will be prepared and submitted to the Sponsor, and the FAA. These documents will incorporate all revisions, modifications, and corrections identified during the final review. Paper and electronic copies will be provided.

2.13 Prepare Requests for Reimbursement. This task includes preparing the FAA Standard Form 271 for Sponsor reimbursement of eligible expenses incurred on a monthly basis. The Engineer will submit the completed form along with appropriate supporting documentation to the Sponsor for review and approval. Upon approval, the Engineer or the Sponsor will submit the completed forms and supporting 157
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

documentation to the FAA for reimbursement. It is estimated there will be three RFRs for expenses incurred during the design and bidding phase of this project.

TASK 2 DELIVERABLES TO FAA/STATE TO SPONSOR

2.01 Preliminary Contract Documents for Sponsor’s Review  

2.02 CSPP at 30% and 90% Complete  

2.06 FAA Form 7460  

2.10 30%, and 90 % Construction Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents, and Engineer’s Design Report  

2.12 Final Construction Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents, and Engineer’s Design Report
 

2.13 Requests for Reimbursement 
TASK 2 MEETINGS/SITE VISITS LOCATION/ATTENDEES/DURATION

2.10 Plan Review at 30% Complete.

Plan Review at 90% Complete.
• South Lake Tahoe, CA
One (1) Project Engineer and one (1) Practice Leader
Assume One (1) hour via teleconference (2 meetings)

3.0 Bidding Phase

3.01 Provide Bid Assistance. The Engineer will assist the Sponsor, as needed, with the preparation of any required bidding documents. Included as part of this task, the Engineer will prepare a legal advertisement for publication in two (2) newspapers (or other form of regularly published print media) as a solicitation for bids. Additionally, the Engineer will advertise the project Invitation for Bids on their website and directly notify potential contractors and plan rooms in order to maximize project exposure and generate interest in the project. The Engineer will coordinate payment for the project advertisement(s) and request reimbursement from the Sponsor as a pass-through cost during invoicing.

3.02 Prepare/Conduct Pre-Bid Meeting. The Engineer will conduct the pre-bid meeting and pre-bid site visit in sequence with the Sponsor and contract document requirements. As a part of this meeting, the Engineer will also discuss the environmental plan sheet, surveyed areas, and environmental commitments.

3.03 Prepare Addenda. Any necessary addenda will be issued to clarify and modify the project, as required, and based on questions or comments that may arise from potential contractors during the bidding process. Any necessary addenda will be reviewed with the Sponsor and FAA prior to being issued.

The addenda will meet all design and construction standards, as required.

3.04 Consult with Prospective Bidders. During the bidding process, the Engineer shall be available to clarify bidding issues with contractors and suppliers and for consultation with the various entities associated with the project.

3.05 Attend Bid Opening. The Engineer shall attend the bid opening for the project, which will be conducted by the Sponsor.

3.06 Review Bid Proposals. Upon the opening of submitted bid proposals by the Sponsor, the Engineer shall review all the bid proposals submitted. A cost analysis of the bid prices will be completed and tabulated; the contractor's qualifications to perform the work will be included, including review of suspension and debarment rules on the www.Sam.gov website, Buy American compliance 158
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

analysis/review, and project funding review. Inclusion of bid guarantee, acknowledgement of addenda, and in-state licensure verification shall be completed.

3.07 Prepare Recommendation of Award. The Engineer shall prepare a Recommendation of Award for the Sponsor to accept or reject the bids received with a summary of the items listed in Task 3.06. If rejection is recommended, the Engineer will supply an explanation for their recommendation and possible alternative actions the Sponsor can pursue to complete the project.

TASK 3 DELIVERABLES TO FAA/STATE TO SPONSOR

3.01 Required Bidding Documents  

3.02 Pre-Bid Meeting Agenda and Pre-Bid Meeting Minutes 

3.03 Addenda  

3.06 Bid Tabulations 

3.07 Recommendation of Award  
TASK 3 MEETINGS/SITE VISITS LOCATION/ATTENDEES/DURATION

3.02 Prepare/Conduct Pre-Bid Meeting • South Lake Tahoe, CA One (1) Project Engineer and one (1) Program Director
Assume full day site visit (1 site visit)
Assume travel to/from Las Vegas, NV to South Lake
Tahoe, CA with one (1) overnight stay for Project
Engineer (1 Meeting)

3.05 Attend Bid Opening • South Lake Tahoe, CA
One (1) Project Engineer
Assume full day site visit (1 site visit)
Assume travel to/from Las Vegas, NV to South Lake
Tahoe, CA with one (1) overnight stay for Project
Engineer (1 Meeting)

EX Reimbursable Costs During Design and Bidding. This section includes reimbursable items such as auto rental, lodging, per diem, and other miscellaneous expenses incurred in order to complete Part A – Basic Services.

PART B - SPECIAL SERVICES consists of the Construction Administration Phase, and Post-Construction Coordination Phase, which are invoiced on a lump sum basis; as well as the On-Site Construction Coordination Phase which are invoiced on a cost plus fixed fee basis).

4.0 Construction Administration Phase

4.01 Prepare Construction Contract and Documents. In agreement with the FAA, the Engineer shall prepare the Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed, and Contract Agreements, including bonds and insurance documents, which will be updated to include all addenda items issued during bidding, for the Sponsor's approval and signatures. Approximately five copies will be submitted to the successful Contractor for their signatures.

The Engineer will ensure the construction contracts are in order, the bonds have been completed, and the Contractor has been provided with adequate copies of the Construction Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents, which will be updated to include all addenda items issued during bidding. 159
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

4.02 Provide Project Coordination. The Engineer shall provide project management and coordination services to ensure the completion of all construction management tasks required of the Engineer. These duties include:
 Time the Engineer spends planning, organizing, securing and scheduling resources, and providing instruction to staff to meet project objectives as defined in the approved scope of work.
 Additional items to be accomplished include compiling and sending additional information requested from the office to related parties, maintaining project files as necessary and other items necessary in day-to-day project coordination.
 The Project Manager will review progress reports weekly and monthly.  Assist with change orders and supplemental agreements as necessary. All change orders and supplemental agreements will be coordinated with the Sponsor and FAA staff prior to execution. All change orders and supplemental agreements will be prepared in accordance with the FAA Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 7.0, Airport Improvement Program Construction Project Change Orders.
 Senior construction management staff will consult with and provide guidance to the on-site Construction Manager regarding unique project elements; material quality, production, and/or placement issues; and any other difficulties encountered during construction.  Clerical staff shall prepare the quantity sheets, testing sheets, construction report format, etc.  Office engineering staff, CAD personnel and clerical staff shall be required to assist the Field Personnel as necessary during construction. Specific tasks to be accomplished include providing secondary engineering opinions on issues arising during construction, maintaining project files as necessary and various other tasks necessary in the day-to-day operations.  The Engineer will prepare and submit monthly invoices.

4.03 Prepare/Conduct Pre-Construction Meeting. The Engineer will conduct a pre-construction meeting to review FAA requirements as required per FAA AC 150/5370-12 (Current Edition), Quality Management for Federally Funded Airport Construction Projects, prior to the commencement of construction. It is anticipated that representatives of the Engineer will include the Project Manager, Project Engineer, and Construction Manager. As a part of this meeting, the Engineer will also discuss the environmental plan sheet, surveyed areas, and environmental commitments. The meeting will be held at the airport and will include the Sponsor, FAA (if possible), Contractor, subcontractors, and airport tenants affected by the project.

4.04 Review Contractor’s Safety Plan Compliance Document. This task includes reviewing and providing comments on the Contractor’s Safety Plan Compliance Document (SPCD) as required per FAA AC 150/5370-2 (Current Edition), Operational Safety on Airports During Construction. The Engineer shall review to ensure that all applicable construction safety items are addressed and meet the requirements of AC 150/5370-2 (Current Edition) and the Contract’s Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP). The intent of the SPCD is to detail how the Contractor will comply with the CSPP. Following award of the project to the successful Contractor, and prior to the issuance of the Notice to Proceed, the Engineer will review the SPCD, provide comments, and, ultimately, approval of the document. It is anticipated that the document will require at least one re-submittal by the Contractor to address any missing information. An approved copy of the SPCD shall be provided to the FAA.

4.05 Review Construction Submittals. This task includes the review of construction submittals, including shop drawings and materials proposed for use on the project, submitted by the Contractor, for general conformance with the Construction Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents. The Engineer will prepare and maintain a submittal register to log the submittals received. The submittal register will 160
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

include information on the submitted items including date received, date returned, and action taken, and will be made available to the Sponsor and Contractor upon request. The submittals anticipated to be required and the estimated time it will take to review each submittal are detailed below.

Submittal Description Estimated Time to
Review (Hours)
Item P-101 Pavement Removal Means & Methods 2
Item P-101 Crack Repair Materials 2
Item P-605 Joint Seal Materials 2
Item P-608 Seal Coat Materials 4
Item P-620 Paint and Beads 2
Total Review Time 12
Additionally, it is anticipated that there will be a number of resubmittals for the various items to address comments from the Engineer’s initial review. It is estimated that reviews of these resubmittals will add approximately 25%, or 3 hours, to the estimated submittal review time from the table above, resulting in an overall estimated submittal review time of 15 hours.

4.06 Prepare Requests for Reimbursement. This task includes preparing the FAA Standard Form 271 for Sponsor reimbursement of eligible expenses incurred on a monthly basis. The Engineer will submit the completed form along with appropriate supporting documentation to the Sponsor for review and approval. Upon approval, the Engineer or the Sponsor will submit the completed forms and supporting documentation to the FAA for reimbursement. It is estimated there will be three RFRs for expenses incurred during the construction and closeout phase of the project.

4.07 Perform Site Visits During Construction. The Project Manager shall make on-site visits, as required, throughout the duration of the project. At this time, it is estimated that the Project Manager will make up to one site visit to the project.

TASK 4 DELIVERABLES TO FAA/STATE TO SPONSOR

4.01 Notice of Award, Notice to Proceed, and Contract Agreement  

4.01 Issue Construction Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents
 

4.02 Pay Request Review Documentation 

4.02 Weekly/Monthly Reports  

4.02 Change Orders/Supplemental Agreements  

4.03 Pre-Construction Agenda and Meeting Minutes 

4.04 Approved Safety Plan Compliance Document (SPCD)  

4.06 Requests for Reimbursement 
161
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

TASK 4 MEETINGS/SITE VISITS LOCATION/ATTENDEES/DURATION

4.03 Conduct Pre-Construction
Meeting
• South Lake Tahoe, CA
One (1) Program Director, and one (1) Construction
Manager
Assume virtual attendance by Program Director (2 hrs)
Assume full day site visit for CM (1 site visit)
Assume travel to/from Las Vegas, NV to South Lake
Tahoe, CA with one (1) overnight stay for each staff
member for the site visit

4.07 Perform Site Visits During
Construction
• South Lake Tahoe, CA
One (1) Practice Leader
Assume full day site visit (1 site visit)
Assume travel to/from Las Vegas, NV to South Lake
Tahoe, CA with one (1) overnight stay for Project
Manager for site visit

5.0 Post-Construction Coordination Phase

5.01 Prepare Clean-up Item List. The Engineer will ensure the Contractor has removed all construction equipment and construction debris from the airport, that all access points have been re-secured (fences repaired, gates closed and locked, keys returned, etc.), and the site is clean.

5.02 Conduct Final Inspection. The Engineer, along with the Sponsor and FAA (if available), shall conduct the final inspection. The quality assurance testing summary report must be accepted by the FAA prior to final inspection.

5.03 Prepare Engineering Record Drawings. The Engineer will prepare the record drawings indicating modifications made during construction. The record drawings will be provided to the FAA electronically.

5.04 Prepare Final Construction Report. The Engineer will prepare the final construction report to meet the applicable FAA closeout checklist requirements.

5.05 Summarize Project Costs. The Engineer will be required to obtain all administrative expenses, engineering fees and costs, testing costs, and construction costs associated with the project and assemble a total project summary. The summary will be analyzed with the associated project funding.

TASK 5 DELIVERABLES TO FAA/STATE TO SPONSOR

5.01 Clean-up List  

5.02 Punchlists  

5.03 Record Drawings  

5.04 Final Construction Report  

5.05 Project Cost Summary  
162
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

TASK 5 MEETINGS/SITE VISITS LOCATION/ATTENDEES/DURATION

5.02 Conduct Final Inspection • South Lake Tahoe, CA
One (1) Program Director
Assume full day site visit (1 site visit)
Assume travel to/from Las Vegas, NV to South Lake
Tahoe, CA with one (1) overnight stay for Project
Manager for each site visit

6.0 On-Site Construction Coordination Phase
This phase will consist of providing full-time Resident Project Representative (RPR). It shall be the responsibility of the RPR to facilitate sufficient on-site construction coordination to ensure that the project is completed according to good construction practice and the Project Manager’s direction. It is estimated that it will take 8 working days to complete construction of the project. Incidental travel costs, including vehicle usage, lodging, per diem, etc., are in addition to the engineering hours expended.

6.01 Provide Resident Engineering. It is estimated that the Resident Project Representative (RPR) will work approximately 12 hours per day. It is assumed that the RPR will be able to complete all daily project documentation during the course of their shift. The total time allotted for the completion of construction is anticipated to be 8 working days with two travel days.

The following tasks will be performed during the course of a typical day’s shift during construction:
a. Review survey data and other construction tasks for general compliance with the construction documents.
b. Coordinate, review, and provide a response to construction and general project Requests for Information (RFIs).
c. Prepare and process field directives and change orders. d. Conduct labor standards interviews of the Contractor's and subcontractor’s employees, and review weekly payroll records as required by the FAA. As part of this effort, all payrolls must be reviewed and logged when received. A log identifying current status of reviews, and any action taken to correct noted discrepancies, will be provided for Sponsor review at time of Request for Reimbursement processing, as appropriate.
e. Review quality control and quality assurance testing results for conformance with the project specifications.
f. Maintain record of the progress of construction, record as-built conditions, and review the quantity records with the Contractor on a periodic basis. g. Prepare the periodic construction cost estimates and review the quantities with the Contractor.

The RPR, Sponsor, and Contractor will resolve discrepancies or disagreements with the Contractor’s records. After compiling all costs, the RPR will submit the periodic construction cost estimate to the Sponsor for payment.
h. Maintain daily logs of construction activities for the duration of time on site, including the Construction Project Daily Safety Inspection Checklist as required by the CSPP and SPCD. i. Verify that construction activities associated with restricted areas, roads, staging areas, stockpiles, borrow/waste areas, etc. are all remaining within the areas cleared under environmental documentation.
j. Prepare a weekly status report using FAA Form 5370-1, Construction Progress and Inspection Report. The report will be submitted to the Sponsor, the FAA, and the office following the week of actual construction activities performed.
163
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

k. Review payments to subcontractors and ensure timely payment of retainage to subcontractors when payment to the Contractor is made.
l. Coordinate and attend weekly construction progress meetings with the Contractor, Sponsor, and other relevant parties.

TASK 6 DELIVERABLES TO FAA/STATE TO SPONSOR

6.01b Coordinate RFIs 

6.01c Field Directives and Change Orders  

6.01d Payroll Reviews  

6.01e Quality Assurance/Quality Control Results Compilation  

6.01g Periodic Cost Estimates  

6.01j Weekly Reports  
TASK 6 ON-SITE PERIODS LOCATION/STAFFING/DURATION

6.01 Provide Resident Engineering • South Lake Tahoe, CA One (1) Resident Project Representative
Assume 8 working days for project and two (2) travel
days for a total of 10 nights of lodging

EX Reimbursable Costs During Construction. This section includes reimbursable items such as auto rental, lodging, per diem, travel and other miscellaneous costs incurred in order to complete Part B – Special Services. Section 4, 5 Reimbursables are invoiced on a lump sum basis, and Section 6 Reimbursables are invoiced on a cost plus fixed fee basis.

Assumptions
The scope of services described previously, and the associated fees, are based on the following rates and assumed responsibilities of the Engineer and Sponsor.

1. For the purposes of estimating the amount of reimbursable expenses which will be incurred by the Engineer, the cost of per diem and lodging are calculated in accordance with current GSA rates. The actual amount to be invoiced for per diem will be in accordance with the published GSA rate at the time of service and may vary from the rate used in the fee estimate.

Lodging will be invoiced as an actual expense incurred.

2. It is anticipated there will be a minimum number of trips and site visits to the airport to facilitate the completion of the various phases listed in this scope. The number of trips, as well as the anticipated lengths and details of the trips, are included at the end of each phase above.

3. The Sponsor will provide an electronic copy of the current ALP to allow for updating of the plan upon completion of the project.

4. The Sponsor will furnish escorts as needed for the Engineer to conduct field work.

5. The Sponsor will coordinate with tenants as required to facilitate field evaluations and construction.
164
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

6. While the project has both eligible and ineligible work, this scope and fee assumes that the project will be designed as one bid package with separate federal and non-federal bid schedules. Splitting the project into two bid packages will result in additional costs.

7. All engineering work will be performed using accepted engineering principles and practices and provide quality products that meet or exceed industry standards. Dimensional criteria will be in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300-13 (Current Edition), Airport Design, and related circulars. Construction specifications will be in accordance with FAA AC 150/5370-10 (Current Edition), Standard Specifications for Construction of Airports, and the Western-Pacific Region’s Regional Updates for Specifying Construction of Airports and related circulars.

Project planning, design, and construction will further conform to all applicable standards, including all applicable current FAA Advisory Circulars and Orders required for use in AIPfunded projects and other national, state, or local regulations and standards, as identified and relevant to an airfield design and construction project.

8. The Engineer will utilize the following plan standards for the project:
 Plans will be prepared using the Engineer’s standards, unless the Sponsor provides its own standards upon Notice to Proceed.
 Plan elevations will be vertical datum NAVD 88 derived from the existing control network.
 Plan coordinates will be based on horizontal datum NAD 83/2011 State Plane Coordinates derived from the existing control network.
 All plans will be stamped and signed by a state-licensed Professional Engineer, or Professional Land Surveyor, as required.
 Plans prepared by subconsultants will be prepared using the same base maps, the same coordinate systems and the same plan layout and format as plans prepared by the Engineer.
 The guidance included in FAA Memorandum, FAA Review of Construction Plans and Specifications for AIP Funded Projects, will be reviewed, incorporated and will supplement the Engineer’s standards.

9. The Engineer will utilize the following assumptions when preparing the project manual for bidding and construction of the project:
 The project manual Contract Documents will be developed jointly by the Sponsor and the Engineer.
 The Engineer is responsible for developing the contents of the document and including the Front-End documents which will be supplied by the Sponsor.  FAA General Provisions and required contract language will be used.

10. The Engineer must maintain records of design analyses and calculations consistent with typical industry standards, as required by the FAA, for a period of three years after the project is closed by the FAA.

11. Because the Engineer has no control over the cost of construction-related labor, materials, or equipment, the Engineer's opinions of probable construction costs will be made on the basis of experience and qualifications as a practitioner of his/her profession. The Engineer does not guarantee that proposals for construction, construction bids, or actual project construction costs will not vary from Engineer's estimates of construction cost. 165
Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-054-2026
Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
January 27, 2026

Additional Services
The following items are not included under this agreement but will be considered as extra work:
 Due to the recent changes to the Federal DBE program, no services for setting DBE Program or Project Goals can be provided at this time, and are not included in this scope of work. If these services are requested after the new certification process has been completed, and notice of completion is provided by the Civil Rights Office, Certifying Agencies, or FAA, they will be under a separate scope of work, or an amendment to this scope of work.  Redesign for the Sponsor’s convenience or due to changed conditions after previous alternate direction and/or approval.
 Submittals or deliverables in addition to those listed herein.  If a project audit occurs, the Engineer is prepared to assist the Sponsor in gathering and preparing the required materials for the audit.
 Serving as an expert witness for the Owner in any litigation, surety claim, contractor bond activation, or other proceeding involving the project.
 Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by extension of contract time, non-concurrent work, or changes in the work.
 Legal, surety, or insurance support, coordination, and representation.

Extra Work will be as directed by the Sponsor in writing for an additional fee as agreed upon by the Sponsor and the Engineer.
166
AIRPORT: Lake Tahoe Airport
AIP/PROJ. NO.:PROJECT NAME: DATE: March 5, 2026
FEE BREAKDOWN LABOR HOUR BREAKDOWNLabor Category
Total
Hours Billing Rate Total Cost Start Date: 1/12/2026 End Date: 2/27/2026 Practice Ldr I Prgrm Dir I Quality Control Manager Engineer in Training II Project Coordinator II Project Accountant I Planner III Phase Item Costs

1.0 Preliminary Design Phase (Lump Sum) 1.0 Preliminary Design Phase (Lump Sum) Kirk Nielsen Lee Underwood Chris Giessing Joseph Fountaine Katrina Akau Silingiwe Bhebhe Morgan Einspahr Practice Ldr I 14 hrs. x $ 325.00 /hr = 4,550.00 $ 1.01 42 4 $ 2,630.00 Prgrm Dir I 6 hrs. x $ 295.00 /hr = 1,770.00 $ 1.02 2 242 $ 2,260.00Quality Control Manager 4 hrs. x $ 285.00 /hr = 1,140.00 $ 1.03 24 $ 1,390.00Engineer in Training II 32 hrs. x $ 185.00 /hr = 5,920.00 $ 1.04 222822 $ 3,830.00Project Coordinator II 8 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 1,200.00 $ 1.05 22 $ 1,020.00Project Accountant I 2 hrs. x $ 120.00 /hr = 240.00 $ 1.06 24 $ 1,330.00Planner III 4 hrs. x $ 280.00 /hr = 1,120.00 $ 1.07 2 44 $ 1,990.00Quality Control Manager 0 hrs. x 1.08 24 $ 1,490.00 SUBTOTAL 70 hrs. SUBTOTAL $ 15,940.00 $ -
$ -
Reimbursables $ -Auto Rental Day x $ 130.00 /Day= $ - $ -Lodging + Tax & Fees Day x $ 165.00 /Day= $ - $ -Per Diem Day x $ 86.00 /Day= $ - $ -Travel & Airline Costs Trip x $ 500.00 /Trip= $ - $ - SUBTOTAL $ - $ -
TOTALS 14 6 4 32 8 2 4 $ 15,940.00
PHASE SUBTOTAL 15,940.00 $ PERCENTAGES 20% 9% 6% 46% 11% 3% 6% Labor Category
Total
Hours Billing Rate Total Cost Start Date: 2/1/2026 End Date: 5/31/2026 Practice Ldr I Quality Control Manager Engineer Project Mgr IV Engineer in Training II Project Coordinator II Engineering Techn I Engineering Techn II Phase Item Costs

2.0 Design Phase (Lump Sum) 2.0 Design Phase (Lump Sum) Kirk Nielsen Chris Giessing Engineer Project Mgr IV Joseph Fountaine Katrina Akau Engineering Techn I Sherilyn Bennion Practice Ldr I 24 hrs. x $ 325.00 /hr = 7,800.00 $ 2.01 2 24 4 $ 2,600.00 Quality Control Manager 12 hrs. x $ 285.00 /hr = 3,420.00 $ 2.02 24 $ 1,390.00Engineer Project Mgr IV 16 hrs. x $ 305.00 /hr = 4,880.00 $ 2.03 $ -Engineer in Training II 62 hrs. x $ 185.00 /hr = 11,470.00 $ 22 $ 620.00Project Coordinator II 2 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 300.00 $ 22 $ 620.00Engineering Techn I 24 hrs. x $ 125.00 /hr = 3,000.00 $ 22 $ 620.00Engineering Techn II 18 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 2,700.00 $ 2 42 $ 1,640.00Quality Control Manager 0 hrs. x 2 42 $ 1,640.00Engineer Project Mgr III 0 hrs. x 2 22 $ 1,270.00Arch Project Mgr III 0 hrs. x 24 $ 870.00Construction Mgr IV 0 hrs. x 24 $ 870.00 0 hrs. x 2.04 44 $ 1,960.000 hrs. x 2.05 2 22 $ 1,630.000 hrs. x 2.06 22 $ 670.000 hrs. x 2.07 24 $ 1,350.000 hrs. x 2.08 2 24 $ 2,000.000 hrs. x 2.09 2 28 2 $ 3,040.000 hrs. x 2.10 44 4 2 $ 3,430.000 hrs. x 2.11 28 $ 2,930.000 hrs. x 2.12 2 4 24 $ 2,240.000 hrs. x 2.13 22 8 $ 2,180.00 SUBTOTAL 158 hrs. SUBTOTAL $ 33,570.00 $ -
$ -
Reimbursables $ -Auto Rental Day x $ 130.00 /Day= $ - $ -Lodging + Tax & Fees Day x $ 165.00 /Day= $ - $ -Per Diem Day x $ 86.00 /Day= $ - $ -Travel & Airline Costs Trip x $ 500.00 /Trip= $ - $ - SUBTOTAL $ - $ -
TOTALS 24 12 16 62 2 24 18 $ 33,570.00
PHASE SUBTOTAL $ 33,570.00 PERCENTAGES 15% 8% 10% 39% 1% 15% 11% Prepare Requests for ReimbursementReview Plans at 30%, and 90% CompleteProvide In-House Quality ControlPrepare and Submit Const. Plans, Specs., Cont. Docs., and Design ReportSeal Coat and Crack Seal PlanPavement Marking Plan/DetailsSafety PlanConstruction Layout PlanConstruction Phasing PlanCalculate Estimated QuantitiesPrepare Estimate of Probable Construction CostPrepare Engineer's Design ReportPrepare Preliminary Technical SpecificationsPrepare Preliminary Special ProvisionsCompile/Submit FAA Form 7460 TASK
Prepare Preliminary Construction PlansCover Sheet

LABOR CATEGORY
Prepare Preliminary Contract DocumentsPrepare Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP)Prepare Preliminary Cost EstimatingProvide Project CoordinationReview Existing Documents 3-06-0249-054-2026Runway 18/36 Pavement Maintenance
Prepare State Grant ApplicationPrepare Federal Grant ApplicationPrepare Environmental Documentation

TASK LABOR CATEGORY
Coordinate and Attend Meetings with the Sponsor and FAAPrepare Project Scope of Work and ContractIndex of Drawings/Summary of Approximate Quantities & General NotesEnvironmental Requirements and Details

167
Labor Category
Total
Hours Billing Rate Total Cost Start Date: 3/1/2026 End Date: 5/31/2026 Practice Ldr I Prgrm Dir I Engineer in Training II Project Coordinator II Arch Project Mgr IV BL Eng Leader Engineer III Phase Item Costs

3.0 Bidding Phase (Lump Sum) 3.0 Bidding Phase (Lump Sum) Kirk Nielsen Lee Underwood Joseph Fountaine Katrina Akau Practice Ldr I 11 hrs. x $ 325.00 /hr = 3,575.00 $ 3.01 2244 $ 2,580.00 Prgrm Dir I 2 hrs. x $ 295.00 /hr = 590.00 $ 3.02 18 $ 1,805.00Engineer in Training II 36 hrs. x $ 185.00 /hr = 6,660.00 $ 3.03 2 44 $ 1,990.00Project Coordinator II 12 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 1,800.00 $ 3.04 4 $ 740.00Arch Project Mgr IV 0 hrs. x 3.05 28 $ 2,130.00BL Eng Leader 0 hrs. x 3.06 2 42 $ 1,690.00Engineer III 0 hrs. x 3.07 2 42 $ 1,690.00 SUBTOTAL 61 hrs. SUBTOTAL $ 12,625.00 $ -
$ -
Reimbursables $ -Auto Rental 1 Day x $ 130.00 /Day= 130.00 $ $ -Lodging + Tax & Fees 1 Day x $ 165.00 /Day= 165.00 $ $ -Per Diem 1 Day x $ 86.00 /Day= 86.00 $ $ -Travel & Airline Costs 1 Trip x $ 500.00 /Trip= 500.00 $ $ - SUBTOTAL $ 881.00 $ -
TOTALS 11 2 36 12 0 0 0 $ 12,625.00
PHASE SUBTOTAL 13,506.00 $ PERCENTAGES 18% 3% 59% 20% 0% 0% 0% Labor Category
Total
Hours Billing Rate Total Cost Start Date: 8/1/2026 End Date: 10/31/2026 Practice Ldr I Prgrm Dir I Engineer in Training II Project Coordinator II Project Accountant I Planner III Engineering Techn II Phase Item Costs

4.0 Construction Administration Phase (Lump Sum) 4.0 Construction Administration Phase (Lump Sum) Kirk Nielsen Lee Underwood Joseph Fountaine Katrina Akau Silingiwe Bhebhe Morgan Einspahr Sherilyn Bennion Practice Ldr I 16 hrs. x $ 325.00 /hr = 5,200.00 $ 4.01 224 $ 1,560.00 Prgrm Dir I 10 hrs. x $ 295.00 /hr = 2,950.00 $ 4.02 244222 $ 3,670.00Engineer in Training II 42 hrs. x $ 185.00 /hr = 7,770.00 $ 4.03 2 12 $ 2,810.00Project Coordinator II 6 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 900.00 $ 4.04 24 $ 1,330.00Project Accountant I 2 hrs. x $ 120.00 /hr = 240.00 $ 4.05 16 $ 2,960.00Planner III 2 hrs. x $ 280.00 /hr = 560.00 $ 4.06 24 12 $ 3,190.00Engineering Techn II 12 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 1,800.00 $ 4.07 12 $ 3,900.00 SUBTOTAL 90 hrs. SUBTOTAL $ 19,420.00 $ -
$ -
Reimbursables $ -Auto Rental 1 Day x $ 130.00 /Day= 130.00 $ $ -Lodging + Tax & Fees 1 Day x $ 165.00 /Day= 165.00 $ $ -Per Diem 1 Day x $ 86.00 /Day= 86.00 $ $ -Travel & Airline Costs 1 Trip x $ 500.00 /Trip= 500.00 $ $ - SUBTOTAL $ 881.00 $ -
TOTALS 16 10 42 6 2 2 12 $ 19,420.00
PHASE SUBTOTAL 20,301.00 $ PERCENTAGES 18% 11% 47% 7% 2% 2% 13% Labor Category
Total
Hours Billing Rate Total Cost Start Date: 8/1/2026 End Date: 12/31/2026 Practice Ldr I Prgrm Dir I Engineer in Training II Engineering Techn I Project Coordinator II Engineering Techn II Engineer III Phase Item Costs

5.0 Post Construction Coordination Phase (Lump Sum) 5.0 Post Construction Coordination Phase (Lump Sum) Kirk Nielsen Lee Underwood Joseph Fountaine Engineering Techn I Katrina Akau Sherilyn Bennion Practice Ldr I 6 hrs. x $ 325.00 /hr = 1,950.00 $ 5.01 2 $ 370.00 Prgrm Dir I 14 hrs. x $ 295.00 /hr = 4,130.00 $ 5.02 12 8 $ 5,020.00Engineer in Training II 32 hrs. x $ 185.00 /hr = 5,920.00 $ 5.03 2 44 $ 1,890.00Engineering Techn I 4 hrs. x $ 125.00 /hr = 500.00 $ 5.04 2 2 16 12 $ 6,000.00Project Coordinator II 2 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 300.00 $ 5.05 2 2 28 $ 2,520.00Engineering Techn II 20 hrs. x $ 150.00 /hr = 3,000.00 $ $ - SUBTOTAL 78 hrs. SUBTOTAL $ 15,800.00 $ -
$ -
Reimbursables $ -Auto Rental Day x $ 130.00 /Day= $ - $ -Lodging + Tax & Fees Day x $ 165.00 /Day= $ - $ -Per Diem 1 Day x $ 86.00 /Day= 86.00 $ $ -Travel & Airline Costs 1 Trip x $ 500.00 /Trip= 500.00 $ $ - SUBTOTAL $ 586.00 $ -
TOTALS 6 14 32 4 2 20 0 $ 15,800.00
PHASE SUBTOTAL 16,386.00 $ PERCENTAGES 8% 18% 41% 5% 3% 26% 0% Prepare Clean-up Item ListConduct Final InspectionPrepare Engineering Record DrawingsPrepare Final Construction ReportSummarize Project CostsPrepare Construction Contract and DocumentsProvide Project CoordinationPrepare/Conduct Pre-Construction MeetingReview Contractor's Safety Plan Compliance DocumentPerform Site Visits During Construction

TASK LABOR CATEGORY
Review Construction SubmittalsPrepare Requests for Reimbursement

TASK LABOR CATEGORY

LABOR CATEGORY
Provide Bid AssistancePrepare/Conduct Pre-Bid MeetingPrepare Addenda TASK
Consult with Prospective BiddersAttend Bid OpeningReview Bid ProposalsPrepare Recommendation of Award

168
Labor Category
Total
Hours Billing Rate Total Cost Start Date: 8/1/2026 End Date: 10/31/2026 Engineer in Training
II
Phase Item Costs

6.0 On-Site Construction Coordination Phase (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) 6.0 On-Site Construction Coordination Phase (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) Joseph Fountaine Engineer in Training II 124 hrs. x $ 55.00 /hr = 6,820.00 $ 10 0 hrs. x 60 hrs. x 90 hrs. x 120 hrs. x 6.01 108 $ 5,940.00 0 hrs. x 16 $ 880.00
SUBTOTAL 124 hrs. SUBTOTAL $ 6,820.00 $ -
$ -
Direct Labor Cost = 6,820.00 $ $ -Overhead (% of Direct Labor Cost) 195.01% = 13,200.00 $ $ -Total Labor Cost = 20,020.00 $ $ -Fixed Fee 20% = 4,000.00 $ $ - SUBTOTAL PHASE LABOR = $ 24,020.00 $ -
Reimbursables $ -Auto Rental 10 Day x $ 135.00 /Day= 1,350.00 $ $ -Lodging + Tax & Fees 10 Day x $ 165.00 /Day= 1,650.00 $ $ -Per Diem 10 Day x $ 86.00 /Day= 860.00 $ $ -Travel & Airline Costs 2 Trip x $ 500.00 /Trip= 1,000.00 $ $ - SUBTOTAL $ 4,860.00 $ -
TOTALS 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 6,820.00
PHASE SUBTOTAL 28,880.00 $ PERCENTAGES 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

CONTRACT HOURS PHASE FEE

REIMBURSABLE

COSTS TOTAL COST
PART A - BASIC SERVICES (LUMP SUM)1.0 Preliminary Design Phase (Lump Sum) 70 $ 15,940.00 $ - $ 15,940.00

2.0 Design Phase (Lump Sum) 158 $ 33,570.00 $ - $ 33,570.00

3.0 Bidding Phase (Lump Sum) 61 $ 881.00 12,625.00 $ 13,506.00 $ 289 SUBTOTAL 62,135.00 $ 881.00 $ 63,016.00 $
PART B - SPECIAL SERVICES (LUMP SUM)4.0 Construction Administration Phase (Lump Sum) 90 $ 881.00 19,420.00 $ 20,301.00 $ 5.0 Post Construction Coordination Phase (Lump Sum) 78 $ 586.00 15,800.00 $ 16,386.00 $ 168 SUBTOTAL 35,220.00 $ 1,467.00 $ 36,687.00 $
PART B - SPECIAL SERVICES (COST PLUS FIXED FEE)6.0 On-Site Construction Coordination Phase (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) 124 20,020.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,860.00 $ 28,880.00 $ 124 SUBTOTAL $ 4,000.00 20,020.00 $ 4,860.00 $ 28,880.00 $ TOTAL 581.0 117,375.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 7,208.00 $ 128,583.00 $ Total Days Scoped for Resident EngineeringEstimated Hours/Day from Scope of WorkEstimated Working Days/Week from Scope of Work

TASK LABOR CATEGORY
Estimated Calendar Days from Scope of WorkProvide Resident EngineeringTravel Time, Mobilization, and Demobilization *For the purposes of estimating the cost of mileage, per diem, and lodging are calculated in accordance with applicable IRS and GSA guidelines. At the time of invoicing mileage will be invoiced in accordance with published IRS rates at the time of service and per diem will be invoiced in accordance with published GSA rates at the time of service. Lodging will be invoiced as actual expense incurred except in the cases where specific client requirements exist that limit lodging to GSA standards.

169

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

AIRPORT MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 21day of June 2022 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“ City”) and Jviation, A Woolpert Company (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be on Task Order assignments in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit B, “ Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the billing rate schedule, fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/ Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for 5 years.

C-103-2022 170

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Billing Rate Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’ s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures.

City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and Sub-Consultant in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant’ s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

7. Consultant’ s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or C-103-2022 171
documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’ s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’ s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’ s representatives, or Consultant’ s successor-in-interest.

8. Independent Consultant. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent Consultant and shall not act as an agent or employee of City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, Consultants or Sub-Consultant hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, Consultants or Sub-Consultant of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’ s assigned personnel. Any third-party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City C-103-2022 172
based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

9. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’ s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/ her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

10. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’ s field of expertise.

11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/ her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

C-103-2022 173
In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

12. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied.

13. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’ s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’ s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’ s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’ s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any Sub-Consultant, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’ s work under this Agreement.

C-103-2022 174

14. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’ s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’ s Liability Insurance for his/ her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each Sub-Consultant to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’ s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the Sub-Consultant’ s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty ( 30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for C-103-2022 175
protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or Sub-Consultant. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per
occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’ s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’ s under Consultant’ s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’ s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty ( 30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’ s insurance policies.

The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the C-103-2022 176
insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any Sub-Consultant to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the Sub-Consultant has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

15. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: Lake Tahoe Airport
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 100
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’ s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Jviation, A Woolpert Company
Travis Vallin, Project Director
720 South Colorado Boulevard, Suite 1200-S
Glendale, CO 80246

16. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the SubConsultant. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and Sub-Consultant nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such Sub-Consultant other than as otherwise required by law.

C-103-2022 177

17. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

18. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 1094.5, and as provided by law.

19. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

20. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent Consultants hired in accordance with Consultant’ s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent Consultant hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

21. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:

C-103-2022 178
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’ s or organization’ s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’ s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’ s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant 1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

22. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and Consultants shall certify and disclose accordingly.

23. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

24. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et.seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

25. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

C-103-2022 179

26. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

28. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

29. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

30. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.

31. Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity.
a. The Offeror’ s or Bidder’ s attention is called to the “Equal Opportunity Clause” and the “Standard Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Construction Contract Specifications” set forth herein. b. The goals and timetables for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Consultant’ s aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Timetables
Goals for minority participation for each trade: 3.78% Race Conscious Goals for female participation in each trade: 6.9%
These goals are applicable to all of the Consultant’ s construction work whether or not it is Federal or federally assisted) performed in the covered area. If the Consultant performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, it shall apply the goals established for such geographical area where the work is actually performed. With regard to this second area, the Consultant also is subject to the goals for both its federally involved and non-federally involved construction.

C-103-2022 180
The Consultant’ s compliance with the Executive Order and the regulations in 41 CFR Part 60-4 shall be based on its implementation of the Equal Opportunity Clause, specific affirmative action obligations required by the specifications set forth in 41 CFR 60-4.3(a) and its efforts to meet the goals.

The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade, and the Consultant shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Consultant to Consultant or from project to project for the sole purpose of meeting the Consultant’ s goals shall be a violation of the contract, the Executive Order and the regulations in 41 CFR Part 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.
a. The Consultant shall provide written notification to the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) within 10 working days of award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the name, address, and telephone number of the Sub-Consultant; employer identification number of the Sub-Consultant; estimated dollar amount of the subcontract; estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and the geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.
b. As used in this notice and in the contract resulting from this solicitation, the “covered area” is the City of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, California.

32. Breach of Contract Terms. Any violation or breach of terms of this contract on the part of the Consultant or its Sub-Consultant may result in the suspension or termination of this contract or such other action that may be necessary to enforce the rights of the parties of this agreement. Owner will provide Consultant written notice that describes the nature of the breach and corrective actions the Consultant must undertake in order to avoid termination of the contract. Owner reserves the right to withhold payments to Consultant until such time the Consultant corrects the breach or the Owner elects to terminate the contract. The Owner’ s notice will identify a specific date by which the Consultant must correct the breach. Owner may proceed with termination of the contract if the Consultant fails to correct the breach by the deadline indicated in the Owner’ s notice. The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder are in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law.

C-103-2022 181

33. General Civil Rights Provisions. The Consultant agrees to comply with pertinent statutes, Executive Orders and such rules as are promulgated to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from Federal assistance. This provision binds the Consultant and Sub-Consultant from the bid solicitation period through the completion of the contract. This provision is in addition to that required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

34. Title VI Solicitation Notice. The City of South Lake Tahoe, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 USC §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders or offerors that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, [select disadvantaged business enterprises or airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises] will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.

35. Compliance with Nondiscrimination Requirements. During the performance of this contract, the Consultant, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”), agrees as follows:
a. Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant ( hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract
b. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of Sub-Consultant, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR part 21.
c. Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Consultant for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential Sub-Consultant or supplier will be notified by the Consultant of the Consultant’ s obligations under this contract and the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

C-103-2022 182
d. Information and Reports: The Consultant will provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities and instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the Consultant will so certify to the sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. e. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a Consultant’ s noncompliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
i. Withholding payments to the Consultant under the contract until the Consultant complies; and/or
ii. Cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.
f. Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto.

The Consultant will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a SubConsultant, or supplier because of such direction, the Consultant may request the sponsor to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the sponsor. In addition, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

36. Clean Air and Water Pollution Control. Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 USC § 740-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 USC § 1251-1387). The Consultant agrees to report any violation to the Owner immediately upon discovery. The Owner assumes responsibility for notifying the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Aviation Administration. Consultant must include this requirement in all subcontracts that exceeds $150,000.

C-103-2022 183

37. Contract Workhours and Safety Standards Act Requirements. a. Overtime Requirements. No Consultant or Sub-Consultant contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.
b. Violation; Liability for Unpaid Wages; Liquidated Damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, the Consultant and any Sub-Consultant responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such Consultant and Sub-Consultant shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages.

Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause.
c. Withholding for Unpaid Wages and Liquidated Damages. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the Owner shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the
Consultant or Sub-Consultant under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime Consultant, or any other federally assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime Consultant, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such Consultant or Sub-Consultant for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (2) of this clause.
d. Sub-Consultant. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraphs ( 1) through (4) and also a clause requiring the Sub-Consultant to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime Consultant shall be responsible for compliance by any Sub-Consultant or lower tier SubC-103-2022 184 Consultant with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this clause.

38. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act. Consultant must comply with the requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 USC 874 and 40 USC 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulation 29 CFR part 3.

Consultant and Sub-Consultant are prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed on the project to give up any part of the compensation to which the employee is entitled. The Consultant and each Sub-Consultant must submit to the Owner, a weekly statement on the wages paid to each employee performing on covered work during the prior week.

Owner must report any violations of the Act to the Federal Aviation Administration.

39. Davis-Bacon Act.
a. Minimum wages.
i. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR Part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalent thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist
between the Consultant and such laborers and mechanics.

Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under section 1(b)(2) of the Davis-Bacon Act on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered
wages paid to such laborers or mechanics, subject to the provisions of paragraph (42)(d) of this section; also, regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period (but not less often than quarterly) under plans, funds, or programs which cover the particular weekly period, are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period. Such laborers and mechanics shall be paid the appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification of work actually
performed, without regard to skill, except as provided in 29 CFR Part 5.5(a)(4). Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one classification may be compensated at the
rate specified for each classification for the time actually C-103-2022 185
worked therein: Provided that the employer’ s payroll records accurately set forth the time spent in each classification in which work is performed. The wage determination (including any additional classification and wage rates conformed
under (42)(b) of this section) and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH1321) shall be posted at all times by the Consultant and its Sub-Consultant at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can easily be seen by the workers. ii. The contracting officer shall require that any class of laborers or mechanics, including helpers, which is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the contract shall be classified in conformance with the wage determination. The contracting officer shall approve an additional classification and wage rate and fringe benefits therefore only when the following criteria have been met:

1. The work to be performed by the classification
requested is not performed by a classification in the
wage determination;

2. The classification is utilized in the area by the
construction industry; and

3. The proposed wage rate, including any bona fide
fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates contained in the wage determination.
iii. If the Consultant and the laborers and mechanics to be employed in the classification (if known), or their
representatives, and the contracting officer agree on the classification and wage rate (including the amount
designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), a report of the action taken shall be sent by the contracting officer to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor,
Washington, DC 20210. The Administrator, or an authorized representative, will approve, modify, or disapprove every additional classification action within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
iv. In the event the Consultant, the laborers, or mechanics to be employed in the classification, or their representatives, and the contracting officer do not agree on the proposed
classification and wage rate (including the amount
designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), the
contracting officer shall refer the questions, including the views of all interested parties and the recommendation of the C-103-2022 186
contracting officer, to the Administrator for determination.

The Administrator, or an authorized representative, will issue a determination within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
v. The wage rate (including fringe benefits where appropriate) determined pursuant to subparagraphs ( 42)(ii) ( 1) or (2) of this paragraph, shall be paid to all workers performing work in the classification under this contract from the first day on which work is performed in the classification.
vi. Whenever the minimum wage rate prescribed in the contract for a class of laborers or mechanics includes a fringe benefit which is not expressed as an hourly rate, the Consultant shall either pay the benefit as stated in the wage determination or shall pay another bona fide fringe benefit or an hourly cash equivalent thereof.
vii. If the Consultant does not make payments to a trustee or other third person, the Consultant may consider as part of the wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits under a plan or program: Provided that the Secretary of Labor has found, upon the written request of the Consultant, that the applicable standards of the Davis-Bacon Act have been met. The Secretary of Labor may require the Consultant to set aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of obligations under the plan or program.
b. Withholding. The Federal Aviation Administration or the sponsor shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld from the Consultant under this contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime Consultant, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements, which is held by the same prime Consultant, so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered necessary to pay laborers and mechanics, including apprentices, trainees, and helpers, employed by the Consultant or any SubConsultant the full amount of wages required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee, or helper, employed or working on the site of work, all or part of the wages required by the contract, the Federal Aviation Administration may, after written notice to the Consultant, Sponsor, Applicant, or Owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such violations have ceased.

C-103-2022 187
c. Payrolls and Basic Records.
i. Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be maintained by the Consultant during the course of the work and preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each such worker; his or her correct classification; hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act); daily and weekly number of hours worked; deductions made; and actual wages paid. Whenever the
Secretary of Labor has found under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(iv) that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act, the Consultant shall maintain records that show that the commitment to provide such benefits is
enforceable, that the plan or program is financially
responsible, and that the plan or program has been
communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics
affected, and that show the costs anticipated or the actual costs incurred in providing such benefits. Consultants
employing apprentices or trainees under approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of
apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee
programs, the registration of the apprentices and trainees, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs.
ii. A. The Consultant shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the Federal Aviation Administration if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the Consultant will submit the payrolls to the applicant, Sponsor, or Owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the Federal Aviation Administration. The payrolls submitted shall set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be
maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i), except that full social security numbers and home addresses shall not be included on weekly transmittals. Instead the payrolls shall only need to include an individually identifying number for each employee e.g. the last four digits of the employee’ s social security number). The required weekly payroll information may be submitted in any form desired. Optional Form WH–347 is
C-103-2022 188
available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division Web site at www.dol.gov/whd/forms/ wh347instr.htm or its successor site. The prime Consultant is responsible for the submission of copies of payrolls by all Sub-Consultant.

Consultants and Sub-Consultant shall maintain the full social security number and current address of each covered worker and shall provide them upon request to the Federal Aviation Administration if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the Consultant will submit them to the applicant, sponsor, or Owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the Federal Aviation Administration, the Consultant, or the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor for purposes of an investigation or audit of
compliance with prevailing wage requirements. It is not a violation of this section for a prime Consultant to require a Sub-Consultant to provide addresses and social security numbers to the prime Consultant for its own records, without weekly submission to the sponsoring government agency (or the applicant, Sponsor, or Owner).

B. Each payroll submitted shall be accompanied by a
Statement of Compliance," signed by the Consultant or SubConsultant or his or her agent who pays or supervises the payment of the persons employed under the contract and
shall certify the following:

1. The payroll for the payroll period contains the
information required to be provided under 29 CFR §

5.5(a)(3)(ii), the appropriate information is being
maintained under 29 CFR § 5.5 (a)(3)(i), and that such
information is correct and complete;

2. Each laborer and mechanic (including each helper,
apprentice, and trainee) employed on the contract
during the payroll period has been paid the full weekly wages earned, without rebate, either directly or
indirectly, and that no deductions have been made
either directly or indirectly from the full wages earned, other than permissible deductions as set forth in
Regulations 29 CFR Part 3;

3. Each laborer or mechanic has been paid not less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or cash
equivalents for the classification of work performed, as specified in the applicable wage determination
incorporated into the contract.
iii. The weekly submission of a properly executed certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form WH-347 shall satisfy C-103-2022 189
the requirement for submission of the “Statement of
Compliance” required by paragraph (3)(ii)(B) of this section. iv. The falsification of any of the above certifications may subject the Consultant or Sub-Consultant to civil or criminal prosecution under Section 1001 of Title 18 and Section 231 of Title 31 of the United States Code.
v. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall make the records required under paragraph (3)(i) of this section available for inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized
representatives of the sponsor, the Federal Aviation
Administration, or the Department of Labor and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during working hours on the job. If the Consultant or Sub-Consultant fails to submit the required records or to make them available, the Federal agency may, after written notice to the Consultant, Sponsor, applicant, or Owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds. Furthermore, failure to submit the required records upon request or to make such records available may be grounds for debarment action
pursuant to 29 CFR 5.12.
d. Apprentices and Trainees.
i. Apprentices. Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work they performed when they are employed pursuant to and individually
registered in a bona fide apprenticeship program registered with the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Bureau, or if a person is employed in his or her first 90 days of
probationary employment as an apprentice in such an
apprenticeship program, who is not individually registered in the program, but who has been certified by the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training or a State Apprenticeship
Agency (where appropriate) to be eligible for probationary employment as an apprentice. The allowable ratio of
apprentices to journeymen on the job site in any craft
classification shall not be greater than the ratio permitted to the Consultant as to the entire work force under the
registered program. Any worker listed on a payroll at an apprentice wage rate, who is not registered or otherwise employed as stated above, shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the
classification of work actually performed. In addition, any C-103-2022 190
apprentice performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage
determination for the work actually performed. Where a
Consultant is performing construction on a project in a locality other than that in which its program is registered, the ratios and wage rates (expressed in percentages of the
journeyman’ s hourly rate) specified in the Consultant’ s or SubConsultant’ s registered program shall be observed. Every apprentice must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the registered program for the apprentice’ s level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeymen hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination. Apprentices shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the apprenticeship program. If the apprenticeship
program does not specify fringe benefits, apprentices must be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable classification. If the Administrator determines that a different practice prevails for the applicable apprentice classification, fringes shall be paid in accordance with that determination. In the event the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training, or a State
Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Bureau, withdraws approval of an apprenticeship program, the Consultant will no longer be permitted to utilize apprentices at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved.
ii. Trainees. Except as provided in 29 CFR 5.16, trainees will not be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work performed unless they are employed pursuant to and individually registered in a program which has received prior approval, evidenced by formal certification by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Employment and Training
Administration. The ratio of trainees to journeymen on the job site shall not be greater than permitted under the plan approved by the Employment and Training Administration.

Every trainee must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the approved program for the trainee’ s level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeyman hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination. Trainees shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the trainee program. If the trainee program does not mention fringe benefits, trainees shall be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination unless the C-103-2022 191
Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division determines that there is an apprenticeship program associated with the
corresponding journeyman wage rate on the wage
determination that provides for less than full fringe benefits for apprentices. Any employee listed on the payroll at a trainee rate that is not registered and participating in a training plan approved by the Employment and Training Administration
shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed. In addition, any trainee performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed.

In the event the Employment and Training Administration withdraws approval of a training program, the Consultant will no longer be permitted to utilize trainees at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved.
e. Equal Employment Opportunity. The utilization of apprentices, trainees, and journeymen under this part shall be in conformity with the equal employment opportunity requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, and 29 CFR Part 30.
f. Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements. The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR Part 3, which are incorporated by reference in this contract.
g. Subcontracts. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses contained in 29 CFR Part 5.5(a)(1) through 10) and such other clauses as the Federal Aviation Administration may by appropriate instructions require, and also a clause requiring the Sub-Consultant to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime Consultant shall be responsible for the compliance by any Sub-Consultant or lower tier Sub-Consultant with all the contract clauses in 29 CFR Part 5.5.
h. Contract Termination: Debarment. A breach of the contract clauses in paragraph 1 through 10 of this section may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a Consultant and a Sub-Consultant as provided in 29 CFR 5.12.
i. Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act Requirements. All rulings and interpretations of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, and 5 are herein incorporated by reference in this contract.
j. Disputes Concerning Labor Standards. Disputes arising out of the labor standards provisions of this contract shall not be subject to the general disputes clause of this contract. Such disputes shall be C-103-2022 192
resolved in accordance with the procedures of the Department of Labor set forth in 29 CFR Parts 5, 6, and 7. Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes between the Consultant (or any of its Sub-Consultant) and the contracting agency, the U.S.

Department of Labor, or the employees or their representatives. k. Certification of Eligibility.
i. By entering into this contract, the Consultant certifies that neither it (nor he or she) nor any person or firm who has an interest in the Consultant’ s firm is a person or firm ineligible to be awarded Government contracts by virtue of section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1).
ii. No part of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or firm ineligible for award of a Government contract by virtue of section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR

5.12(a)(1).
iii. The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the U.S. Criminal Code, 18 USC 1001.

40. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The Consultant shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of Department of Transportation- assisted contracts. Failure by the Consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the Owner deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:
a. Withholding monthly progress payments;
b. Assessing sanctions;
c. Liquidated damages; and/or
d. Disqualifying the Consultant from future bidding as non-responsible.

The Prime Consultant agrees to pay each Sub-Consultant under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than sixty ( 60) days from the receipt of each payment the prime Consultant receives from the City of South Lake Tahoe. The prime Consultant agrees further to return retainage payments to each Sub-Consultant within sixty ( 60) days after the Sub-Consultant’ s work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the City of South Lake Tahoe. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE Sub-Consultant.

41. Texting When Driving. In accordance with Executive Order 13513, “ Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving”, ( 10/ 1/ 2009) and DOT Order 3902.10, “ Text Messaging While Driving”, ( 12/ 30/ 2009), the Federal Aviation Administration encourages recipients of Federal grant funds to C-103-2022 193
adopt and enforce safety policies that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing work related to a grant or subgrant. In support of this initiative, the Owner encourages the Consultant to promote policies and initiatives for its employees and other work personnel that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies that ban text messaging while driving motor vehicles while performing work activities associated with the project. The Consultant must include the substance of this clause in all sub-tier contracts exceeding $3,500 that involve driving a motor vehicle in performance of work activities associated with the project.

42. Energy Conservation Requirements. Consultant and Sub-Consultant agree to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency as contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 USC 6201et seq).

43. Equal Opportunity Clause. During the performance of this contract, the Consultant agrees as follows:
a. The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identify, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff, or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. b. The Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive considerations for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. c. The Consultant will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the Consultant’ s commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

C-103-2022 194
d. The Consultant will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
e. The Consultant will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
f. In the event of the Consultant’ s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
g. The Consultant will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs ( 1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each Sub-Consultant or vendor. The Consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event a Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a Sub-Consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency the Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

44. Fair Labor Standards Act. All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the provisions of 29 CFR part 201, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The FLSA sets minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards for full and part-time workers. The Consultant has full responsibility to monitor compliance to the referenced statute or regulation. The Consultant must address any claims or disputes that arise C-103-2022 195
from this requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division.

45. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the requirements of 29 CFR Part 1910 with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The employer must provide a work environment that is free from recognized hazards that may cause death or serious physical harm to the employee. The employer retains full responsibility to monitor its compliance and their SubConsultant’ s compliance with the applicable requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (20 CFR Part 1910). The employer must address any claims or disputes that pertain to a referenced requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

46. Prohibition of Segregated Facilities.
a. The Consultant agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The Consultant agrees that a breach of this clause is a violation of the Equal Employment Opportunity clause in this contract.
b.“ Segregated facilities,” as used in this clause, means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin because of written or oral policies or employee custom. The term does not include separate or single-user rest rooms or necessary dressing or sleeping areas provided to assure privacy between the sexes.
c. The Consultant shall include this clause in every subcontract and purchase order that is subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity clause of this contract.

47. Procurement of Recovered Materials. Consultant and Sub-Consultant agree to comply with Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247. In the performance of this contract and to the extent practicable, the Consultant and Sub-Consultants are to use products containing the highest percentage of recovered materials for items C-103-2022 196
designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under 40 CFR Part 247 whenever:
a. The contract requires procurement of $ 10,000 or more of a designated item during the fiscal year; or
b. The Consultant has procured $10,000 or more of a designated item using Federal funding during the previous fiscal year.

The list of EPA-designated items is available at:
www.epa.gov/smm/ comprehensive-procurement-guidelines-constructionproducts.

Section 6002(c) establishes exceptions to the preference for recovery of EPAdesignated products if the Consultant can demonstrate the item is:
a. Not reasonably available within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule;
b. Fails to meet reasonable contract performance requirements; c. Is only available at an unreasonable price.

48. Rights to Inventions. Contracts or agreements that include the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work must provide for the rights of the Federal Government and the Owner in any resulting invention as established by 37 CFR part 401, Rights to Inventions Made by Non-profit Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Grants, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements. This contract incorporates by reference the patent and inventions rights as specified within 37 CFR § 401.14. Consultant must include this requirement in all sub-tier contracts involving experimental, developmental, or research work.

49. Seismic Safety. In the performance of design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish a building design and associated construction specification that conform to a building code standard that provides a level of seismic safety substantially equivalent to standards as established by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). Local building codes that model their building code after the current version of the International Building Code (IBC) meet the NEHRP equivalency level for seismic safety. At the conclusion of the design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish the Owner a “certification of compliance” that attests conformance of the building design and the construction specifications with the seismic standards of NEHRP or an equivalent building code.

50. Termination for Convenience. The Owner may, by written notice to the Consultant, terminate this Agreement for its convenience and without cause or default on the part of Consultant. Upon receipt of the notice of termination, except as explicitly directed by the Owner, the Contractor must immediately discontinue all services affected. Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, C-103-2022 197
models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete. Owner agrees to make just and equitable compensation to the Consultant for satisfactory work completed up through the date the Consultant receives the termination notice. Compensation will not include anticipated profit on nonperformed services. Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

51. Termination for Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if the other party fails to fulfill its obligations that are essential to the completion of the work per the terms and conditions of the Agreement. The party initiating the termination action must allow the breaching party an opportunity to dispute or cure the breach. The terminating party must provide the breaching party seven (7) days advance written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement. The notice must specify the nature and extent of the breach, the conditions necessary to cure the breach, and the effective date of the termination action. The rights and remedies in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement.
a. Termination by Owner: The Owner may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, for the failure of the Consultant to:
i. Perform the services within the time specified in this contract or by Owner approved extension;
ii. Make adequate progress so as to endanger satisfactory performance of the Project; or
iii. Fulfill the obligations of the Agreement that are essential to the completion of the Project.

Upon receipt of the notice of termination, the Consultant must immediately discontinue all services affected unless the notice directs otherwise. Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete. Owner agrees to make just and equitable
compensation to the Consultant for satisfactory work completed up through the date the Consultant receives the termination notice.

Compensation will not include anticipated profit on non-performed services. Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause. If, after finalization of the termination action, the Owner determines the Consultant was not in C-103-2022 198
default of the Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Owner issued the termination for the convenience of the Owner.
b. Termination by Consultant. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, if the Owner:
i. Defaults on its obligations under this Agreement;
ii. Fails to make payment to the Consultant in accordance with the terms of this Agreement;
iii. Suspends the Project for more than one hundred and eighty 180) days due to reasons beyond the control of the
Consultant.

Upon receipt of a notice of termination from the Consultant, Owner agrees to cooperate with Consultant for the purpose of terminating the agreement or portion thereof, by mutual consent. If Owner and Consultant cannot reach mutual agreement on the termination settlement, the Consultant may, without prejudice to any rights and remedies it may have, proceed with terminating all or parts of this Agreement based upon the Owner’ s breach of the contract. In the event of termination due to Owner breach, the Engineer is entitled to invoice Owner and to receive full payment for all services performed or furnished in accordance with this Agreement and all justified reimbursable expenses incurred by the Consultant through the effective date of termination action. Owner agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

52. Veterans Preference. In the employment of labor (excluding executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), the Contractor and all sub-tier contractors must give preference to covered veterans as defined within Title 49 United States Code Section 47112. Covered veterans include Vietnamera veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns (as defined by 15 USC 632) owned and controlled by disabled veterans. This preference only applies when there are covered veterans readily available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.

53. Time Overruns Beyond Control of Consultant. On airport architectural/ engineering construction contract amendments to the Master Professional Services Agreement, the Consultant must provide the City with amendment language that states the period of time as specified by the number of contract days for which the compensation applies. The consultant must be reimbursed for services in excess of the specified period of time at a mutually acceptable fee negotiated at the time all the pertinent circumstances are known. The cost of additional consultant technical inspection services that C-103-2022 199
would result from Construction Contractor or City caused construction delays should be included in the liquidated damages established for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) construction contracts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By____________________________ By ________________________________ Devin Middlebrook, Mayor Travis Vallin, Project Director Business License # 011275
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By________________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
Exhibit D - Trade Restriction Certification
Exhibit E - Tax Delinquency and Felony Convictions Certification Exhibit F - Certification of Offerer/ Bidder Regarding Debarment C-103-2022
Sue Blankenship ( Jun 28, 2022 08:45 PDT) Jun 28, 2022
Heather Stroud ( Jun 28, 2022 08:58 PDT)
Devin Middlebrook ( Jun 28, 2022 12:14 PDT) Travis Vallin ( Jul 12, 2022 07: 12 MDT) Travis Vallin
200

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Scope of Services will be based on Task Orders, which will be negotiated based on the Schedule of Charges in Exhibit B.

C-103-2022 201

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
5-Year Airport Planning Services
Lake Tahoe Airport
April 29, 2022
6920 Santa Teresa Boulevard, Suite 208
San Jose, CA 95119
C-103-2022 202
1 1. TRANSMITTAL LETTER
April 29, 2022
Milan Jevic
Lake Tahoe Airport
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 100
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
RE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS — 5-YEAR AIRPORT PLANNING SERVICES Dear Mr. Jevic and Members of the Selection Committee:

Jviation, a Woolpert Company, has served as a trusted partner to the Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) in conducting, designing, and implementing planning and engineering projects for the Airport since 2018. Our work with TVL has developed our understanding of your needs and vision, the Airport’ s importance to the community, and the Airport’ s commitment to a balance growth with environmental stewardship. We are excited to have the opportunity to extend our project team’s relationship with TVL through this planning services contract.

TVL AND RESORT AIRPORT UNDERSTANDING. Jviation’s focus on aviation and aviation-related projects means our experienced staff will anticipate TVL’s needs, ensure projects stay on-budget and on-time, and work alongside airport personnel and community members. Our expertise and approach guarantee that the proposed projects will be addressed deftly to maximize time and cost efciency while minimizing the need for rework. Jviation maintains on-call contracts with several airports similar contracts with several mountain resort airports similar to TVL: Eagle County Regional Airport (EGE), Gunnison- Crested Butte Airport (GUC), and Jackson Hole Airport (JAC). These airports are single-runway facilities located in or near mountain resort destinations. More specically, we understand the scal challenges facing TVL and other single-runway destination airports.

ENVIRONMENTAL. Jviation’ s longstanding partner, Environmental Science Associates ( ESA), currently provides environmental consulting services to TVL and will continue to do so under this contract to facilitate effective coordination and successful outcomes. ESA has supported many of Jviation’ s projects around California; one such effort at the Airport is the Airspace Obstruction Evaluation conducted by Greg Dyer.

Greg’s work to identify obstructions while maintaining the Airport’ s treescape harmonizes airport development efforts with TVL’s commitment to environmental stewardship.

COMMUNITY OUTREACH. Current Jviation team member Wildscape Engineering, who is already helping to meet your engineering needs, will play an expanded role within the critical Community Outreach component of planning efforts. Their ofce location at TVL and their familiarity with the region has proven to be invaluable in our success. We are excited to work with a rm with strong communal ties and a deep understanding of California’ s regulatory environment.

SUSTAINABILITY. The Jviation team employs sustainable strategies and principles as a function of our holistic planning and design approach. Our collaboration philosophy ensures that our sustainability practices are applied consistently with every client and within the Jviation organization to maximize bene ts for the environment, the economy, and for society. In addition, we have secured a partnership with Johnson Aviation to ensure that your nancial needs are appropriately addressed.

Our team brings the right mix of personnel, experience, expertise, and local representation needed to accomplish all of your goals. We look forward to the opportunity to continue to serve the Airport and the South Lake Tahoe community. Thank you for your consideration.

Tony Davis, Project Manager
Tony. Davis@woolpert. com
Kirk Nielsen, Client Liaison
Kirk.Nielsen@woolpert. com
Travis Vallin, Project Director
Travis.Vallin@woolpert. com
6920 Santa Teresa Boulevard, Suite 208,
San Jose, CA 95119
C-103-2022 203
2 2. GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO

THE CONTEMPLATED SCOPE OF WORK
Under the leadership of our Project Manager, Tony Davis, and our Contract Liaison, Kirk Nielsen, Jviation will serve as the prime consultant with overall responsibility for the work performance of the team members and any and all planning services required by TVL. In addition to the extensive resources of our parent company, Woolpert, we have added the expertise of three industry leading consultants (ESA, Johnson Aviation, and Wildscape Engineering) to enhance our abilities.

PROVEN PARTNERSHIP
Jviation is excited about the opportunity of continuing our partnership with Lake Tahoe Airport helping to achieve its development goals. We provide an efcient and responsive team with experience at your Airport as well as at airports similar to TVL. Our in-depth understanding of the challenges faced by the Airport and strong understanding of the South Lake Tahoe community will be critical factors in developing exible, viable planning solutions for TVL.

JVIATION WILL SERVE AS YOUR LONG- TERM PARTNER TO PROMOTE SAFE OPERATIONS AND THOUGHTFUL GROWTH AT TVL.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Timely and proactive communication and coordination is critical to the delivery of quality and successful projects for TVL. Our approach to planning is typically centered on the Project Management Plan (PMP) to ensure that the project approach is in alignment with needs and expectations of the Airport. The tactical actions identi ed in the PMP will set the tone for performance parameters, quality expectations, and protocols for the planning team.

Our PMP will align with the needs and requirements of the City of South Lake Tahoe and TVL. As such, our team will meet with City staff to tailor our PMP document to deliver on your expectations. Key elements of the plan include:

Scope of Work. A clearly dened scope of work establishes the key project deliverables and milestones for a project. The Jviation Team will appropriate scopes of work in coordination with TVL so that all parties can agree and work in unison. This effort serves as the road map for the work execution. By placing an emphasis on early planning and scoping, our project team can effectively manage and focus our efforts on delivering quality work products that are on-time, on-budget, and that meet, if not exceed, your expectations.

Roles and Responsibility Matrix. The matrix denes the roles and responsibilities of team members and stakeholders to establish ownership and accountability.

Communication Plan. The communication plan denes both internal and external communication methods, including written communication, meetings, phone/ web conferences, and project documentation throughout the project lifecycle.

C-103-2022 204
3 Product Delivery Plan. Delivering quality products on time and within budget is paramount. We will monitor budgets and product delivery weekly to ensure that we are meeting production goals for the project. If any deviations are encountered, we develop a recovery plan to efciently accomplish the remaining tasks within budget.

Quality Control. In delivering hundreds of projects over the years, we have learned that a comprehensive quality control program is invaluable to project success. Through our comprehensive quality control programs, which includes reviews from people not directly associated with the design, we strive to minimize the review efforts required by our clients.

UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED WORK PLAN
TVL needs well-executed planning to reach its developmental and operational goals - and Jviation will deliver that for TVL. We view the planning process as the foundation upon which is built the establishment of realistic airport visioning, accurate project denition, the leveraging and management of funding, implementation of operational requirements, integration of best practices, among many others. We don’t perform planning merely to fulll regulatory obligations— our plans are solution- oriented and customized to meet the individual needs of our clients.

Through our experience executing hundreds of projects funded by the FAA Airport Improvement Program AIP) as well as through dozens of state aeronautics agencies, we have gained a thorough understanding of the AIP process and state- related requirements. Going above and beyond simply consulting, Jviation is staffed with multiple former leaders of FAA Airport District Ofces (ADO), former heads of individual state aeronautic agencies, and others that have served as project managers for airport sponsors. In short, we understand the needs and requirements of airport project funding from all sides.

We have conducted multiple planning efforts for TVL over the past several years and we know the Airport.

However, in anticipation of this On-Call Planning request for quali cations, we have regularly visited with several times with Airport and City staff to not only gain an understanding of TVL’s immediate planning needs but to also discuss planning potentials on the horizon.

We know that the primary and most immediate need of this On-Call Planning contract is an Airport Master Plan. We understand your needs and our staff will craft an Airport Master Plan that will help TVL reach its goals in a measured and reasonable fashion. The Jviation team’s planning approach, strategies, and methodologies, combined with our understanding of TVL, are distinct advantages and ensure that our team will successfully deliver a thoughtful planning effort and a bene cial outcome.

This is Your Airport Master Plan
An effective Airport Master Plan is characterized by a long-term vision based on realistic expectations, expert technical consultation, informed interactions with stakeholders, and exible development recommendations.

Our team is committed to crafting an Airport Master Plan that not only embraces those characteristics but also formulates creative solutions that meet Airport’ s and its host community’ s long-term goals.

FOLLOWING THE FAA GUIDANCE
Part of our job is to make certain that the planning process and resulting deliverables are comprehensive. However, a great deal of exibility is afforded by the FAA, and our plan will be tailored to t the needs and objectives your Airport, your stakeholders, and your community.

C-103-2022 205
4 Pre-Planning Phase: Project Scope, Fee Negotiation, Approvals, Agreements Our suggested approach begins with a comprehensive scoping process designed to plot a course that considers the objectives and expectations from multiple viewpoints. A workshop with our experts and City staff/ stakeholders will facilitate this process. Sample topics that can be explored include:

What is the method and intensity of public engagement that will best engage local leadership, economic development directors, business owners, and the community? How can the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency ( TRPA) best be engaged to ensure they are a part of the master planning process and have input necessary to meet their mission? How can the airport balance air transportation objectives with nancial sustainability and diversication given land-use policies, community expectations, and other local initiatives? What steps will ensure a cost- effective planning process that meets all critical objectives? Jviation is adept at utilizing the inherent exibility of FAA airport master planning and recognizes that effective communication during the pre-planning phase is crucial to maintaining schedule performance and technical execution. This effort ensures that the nal scope of work will not inhibit creativity and exibility— a common challenge that occurs when stakeholder viewpoints are uncovered during the process instead of at the beginning.

MASTER PLAN

PROCESS

INVESTIGATION

SOLUTIONS

IMPLEMENTATION
Inventory
Forecasts & Planning
Activity Levels
Facility Requirements
Environmental
Requirements
Alternatives Analysis
Contingency Scenario
Development
GHQWLFDWLRQ RI 3UHIHUUHG
Alternatives
Financial Planning
Improvement Plan (CIP)
Final Master Plan
Documentation
Airport Layout
Plan (ALP)
1 2
3 4
5 P
U

BLICENGA G E M
E N
TPU B
L

IC E NGAGEME
N
T

PRE-PLANNING APPROVAL
Project Scope
Vision Workshop
C-103-2022 206
5 Investigation Phase: Data Collection, Surveys, Demand Forecasts, Facility Requirements, Forecast Approval
The Investigation Phase of the airport master plan sets the foundation of the overall planning effort. It is designed to effectively answer the following questions:

Who are we today?
Where are we going tomorrow?
What do we need to get there?
Because this phase is conducted early in the planning process, rigorous adherence to the project schedule will avoid the pitfalls associated with elongated efforts. The perspectives and strategies that constitute concise execution will vary between the inventory and forecast efforts. An efcient inventory effort will capitalize on already- available data and information on new trends and events to ensure continual data collection and adherence to the project schedule. A reasonable and defensible forecast establishes a foundation that will allow TVL to consider a range of market- based demand scenarios.

Forecasting effectively serves as the “ hub” of any airport master plan and is critical to its ultimate results. Forecasts that are too aggressive can lead to an over-investment in unnecessary facilities; conversely, overly conservative forecasts may leave an airport unable to meet the demands of the ying public and the community. Our team is well- versed in delivering forecasts that meet agency and stakeholder demands, and that will:

Provide technically thorough and sound forecast conclusions that support development and will be approved by the FAA Effectively consider the market and industry realities facing TVL today and tomorrow
Synthesize facility inventory data to identify appropriate activity levels
Jviation understands that some investments/ expenses that meet airport and local objectives may not attract FAA grant funds; therefore, the team will provide full consideration and justication for these investments. In our experience, responsiveness to general aviation pilots/ owners in the airport master plan is another common challenge. This group’ s trust and support is key, but, if the presented plan shows minimal investment or opportunity for growth in their facilities, this key stakeholder group may feel disenfranchised. Our team (many of whom are licensed pilots) appreciates the importance of general aviation operations and, via genuine, effective listening and communication, will address any stakeholder concerns.

Solutions Phase: Identication of Alternatives, Analysis, Identication of Selection Criteria, Preferred Alternative( s)
The Solutions Phase is the critical output of the Airport Master Plan. Jviation’s creative and analytical approach to formulating practicable solutions is the key step in identifying the best solution from an array of potential ideas. Our team appreciates that even the best solution really is no solution unless we establish buy-in and support from the groups who ultimately provide the approval and implementation.

Coupled with a reasonable and defensible projection of aviation demand, a thoughtful capacity and condition analysis of the existing facilities will help determine appropriate future aireld, terminal area, landside, and access needs. While overall airport capacity is a common element of a typical master plan, Jviation incorporates Jviation has extensive
experience in generating
thoughtful, reasonable, and
defensible forecasts and facility
requirements through planning
products at various levels of
analysis (i.e., site specic, airport
master planning, and system
planning). Our staff prides
itself in tailoring our forecasts
to reect current market
conditions, reasonable airport
and industry projections, and
FAA requirements, while also
considering sensible potential
development scenarios.

C-103-2022 207
6 a more targeted capacity analysis that evaluates specic elements of the airport. For example, while the runway and taxiway system at an airport may have the capacity to accommodate 20-year demands, Jviation would consider the condition, remaining life, hot spots, aircraft ow and efciency, and design standards when making recommended runway and taxiway improvements. This same philosophy applies to many other aspects of the landside, terminal area, and surface access.

Another facet to consider is that some areas of the airport may be determined to have excess capacity. While a typical study may stop there, Jviation recognizes an airport’ s goal to gain and remain nancially self-sufcient.

To that end, Jviation frequently recommends alternative uses and out-of-the-box thinking to make use and generate revenue for airport facilities that may be underutilized.

Our approach to this phase will include a mix of planning exercises, stakeholder engagements, and dedicated time and effort at every level of the project team. This approach normalizes and balances the variety of perspectives, inputs, agendas, and analyses so the best solutions are infused with good information and rise to the top. Well- developed selection criteria are the foundation of this phases’ key evaluations. We will employ a survey or poll, in conjunction with a Planning Advisory Committee ( PAC), to establish a baseline of understanding, objectives, and viewpoints on key airport and planning topics. We will then distill a list of quanti able selection criteria to inform of alternatives solutions and facilitate decision- making.

Jviation planners work closely with our engineers to design thoughtful plans and layouts for all airport clients. It is a collaborative effort to achieve sound engineering with logical and justiable planning. Most planning efforts carried out by Jviation include a series of three to four alternative sketches or concepts. Preliminary layouts are developed in a cost-effective manner to illustrate the overall purpose and functionality of a concept. From these, a review and evaluation with Sponsor participation quanties measurable benets and impacts as well as considers more subjective qualities of an alternative. Jviation engineers are engaged throughout the process and are called on to develop cost estimates for each alternative as a part of the evaluation stage. The result is a recommendation that evokes a clear purpose and solution to a problem and considers all aspects of the project.

Environmental and aesthetic considerations will be a very important part of any airport development in the South Lake Tahoe region. Balancing airport development needs with the protection of environmental resources is not only required by NEPA but is also a sound ethical practice. Whether completing an abbreviated Environmental Assessment or an Environmental checklist, this requisite NEPA documentation must be completed accurately and in a timely manner. Environmental projects under this contract will follow the requirements of FAA Order 1050. 1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures and FAA Order 5050. 4B, National Environmental Policy Act - Implementation Instruction for Airport Actions. Jviation’ s environmental staff and ESA are well- suited to assist you through any environmental concern. The Jviation team’s experience at TVL includes involvement in varying capacities from State, Local, NEPA, and US Army Corps of Engineers USACE) environmental actions related to airport improvements.

Proper storytelling better conveys technical information and justication to an audience by drawing in the reader and inviting them to personally invest in it. Effective communication is critical to enable all audiences to clearly understand the bene ts or challenges associated with alternative solutions. We have found that a picture, or more speci cally, a good picture truly is worth a thousand words, particularly when it comes to alternatives planning. Stakeholders need to not just hear about or read about the future, they need to see it and be able to personally relate to it. We recognize that this sort of understanding and connection cannot be gleaned from an engineering drawing. That is why we have invested so much in our multimedia approaches and graphical modeling capabilities to enable stakeholders to virtually experience the future through static graphics, animations, and virtual reality technologies.

C-103-2022 208
7 Implementation Phase: Capital Improvement Program, Detailed Financial Analysis, Implementation Plan
The Implementation Phase has the greatest impact on how an airport master plan is used to guide decisions.

At its foundation is a comprehensive analysis of the airport’s ability to implement and nancially support the capital program. Moreover, this phase identies the factors and critical projects that need to be managed and accounted for as larger objectives are pursued over time. Financial feasibility, political acceptance, environmental compliance, activity triggers, and stakeholder support are all intertwined and Jviation will spotlight all the steps and conditions that must be in place to achieve ultimate success.

Development and updating of the Airport’ s CIP requires identi cation of capital improvements, ranking each project based on the FAA’s priority ranking system, inclusion of environmental reviews and approvals, cost estimates and funding sources. Potential funding sources, including Airport, FAA, state funds, and private sources will be identi ed.

The Airport’ s nancial management is an important consideration in implementing recommendations. A nancial implementation plan will be prepared according to the preferable phasing of capital improvements.

An analysis of TVL’s operating, maintenance and capital expenses, together with its revenues, will be prepared for the ve-, ten-, and twenty- year time frames to illustrate how TVL will pay for recommended improvements.

The ALP is a plan set that provides a graphical depiction of the airport’s existing conditions including building facilities, pavements, airspace and obstructions, as well as all proposed future development within a dened planning period. It is intended to provide guidance for the airport, federal and state agencies, and consultants for short-term and long-term capital improvement projects at the airport. Jviation is well-versed in producing ALP sets for airports of all sizes. These plans are compliant with all FAA standards, including FAA AC 150/ 5070- 6B, Airport Master Plans; FAA AC 150/ 5300-13B Airport Design; FAA SOP 2.00, Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans; and FAA SOP 3.00, Standard Operating Procedure for FAA Review of Exhibit ‘A’ Airport Property Inventory Maps. In addition to any planning efforts and/ or narratives supporting the completion of the ALP. We utilize all appropriate sources of information for these drawings to minimize expense yet ensure accuracy including previous ALP and master planning documentation, aerial photogrammetry, airport Obstruction Chart, USGS mapping, legal descriptions, existing airspace and property surveys, airspace and obstruction analyses, FAA databases, and any other secondary sources readily available to TVL.

Beyond just the plan sets, Jviation tailors its master planning and ALP processes towards the individual needs of its client airports. We know that every airport is different, varying widely not just with respect to their local facilities, but also within the community context each must operate. We succeed in facilitating development of long-term planning efforts that fulll the unique requirements of airports, while complying with ever-evolving FAA airport design, airspace, survey, and operational requirements. ( This includes integration with FAA AGIS and eALP systems, as well as experience in addressing non- standard pavement geometries.) We have experience in addressing a wide range of issues that dictate each airport’ s individual master planning needs, including traditional airport planning needs, in addition to specialized services such as ground access, parking and air service. Jviation’ s wealth of master planning and ALP experience encompasses airports of all sizes, including numerous general aviation airports.

The planning effort at TVL will call for the revision of the ALP set to include changes to future development plans as well as property acquisitions/ easement acquisitions/ land releases for future development and clearing of obstacles to air navigation. Jviation planning and engineering staff will make use of the Airport’ s current ALP set and recent aeronautical survey to update and revise recommended projects and acquisition plans for submittal and approval by the FAA.

Additionally, our ALPs are not only full compliant with FAA requirements and standard operating procedures, but they are produced in both GIS and AutoCAD platforms to maximize their utility as well as their utility and longevity.

C-103-2022 209
8 Approval Phase: Finishing Strong.

Even when a plan is 90 percent complete, there is still 90 percent remaining. Airport master plans are notorious for their ability to linger for years as they can fall prey to interminable reviews and bureaucratic logjams.

Jviation’s commitment to nish strong ensures the implementation of a clearly dened and timely plan. Jviation assigns a team member to own and facilitate the project closeout.

Stakeholder Engagement: Truly Reaching Out and Being There The art of stakeholder engagement is often taken for granted. Challenges can arise when much of the planning is performed separate from the airport stakeholder community and the public. And whether it be directly afliated with an airport master plan or part of some other planning effort, Jviation has a proven history of reaching out and engaging people on a personal level to broaden the audience, increase their participation, and encourage their approval. This will be the case with involvement by the TRPA. We recognize that the TRPA must be engaged in the planning process and have a say in the recommendations of the Master Plan. Jviation will maintain active outreach with the TRPA throughout the planning process.

Jviation has broad experience designing and implementing multi-faceted stakeholder engagement programs and will tailor this effort to meet the needs of TVL. Our outreach approach ensures that everyone directly affected by, or interested in the airport, has access to pertinent information and has a voice in the planning process. One key element of an engagement program is to educate the public about the airport and the laws, regulations, policies, guidelines, standards, and procedures that govern its operation, maintenance, funding, and development. The Jviation team is experienced in utilizing many types of outreach mechanisms:

Planning Advisory Committee ( PAC)
Stakeholder/ Focus Group Meetings
Presentations to Elected Ofcials
Public Information Meetings
Surveys of Airport Users
Meetings/ Presentations at Discretion of the Airport
Public Outreach Materials:
oInteractive Airport Master Plan Website
oMaster Plan Brochure
oMedia Communication
oAirport Tours
oAirport Video
oPlanning Visualizations and Animations
oSocial Media— Master Plan Application ( App), Facebook Page, and Twitter C-103-2022 210
TVL’s Obstruction and Mitigation Study completed by
Jviation in 2018
9 OTHER KEY AREAS OF PLANNING FOCUS FOR TVL
Airspace Protection Evaluation and Mitigation
Jviation has a current and comprehensive understanding of TVL’s latest obstruction survey and all the qualications to complete a new AGIS Aeronautical Survey and Obstruction Analysis Report. In addition, through our recent completion of the Airport’s Obstruction Mitigation Plan, we understand the current runway utilization patterns, existing procedures,
and runway/ airspace limitations at the Airport. That
understanding will be critical to making well-educated
recommendations to TVL and guiding the Airport
through the process of addressing obstructions to air
navigation. It is understood that TVL has signicant
challenges to overcome when it comes to obstruction
clearing and mitigation. Jviation planners have worked
with airports to develop a plan, initiate public outreach, and achieve consensus to resolve similar obstruction
issues. For example, T. F. Green Airport in Providence, Rhode Island had obstruction issues similar in magnitude to TVL. The Jviation planner working on the project led stakeholders, including the FAA, state and regional agencies, through the analysis of obstructions and alternatives to address them, in order to devise a plan that everyone could accept.

To aid in the analysis of obstruction data, Jviation employs a full team of surveying professionals knowledgeable in AGIS and airspace surfaces. Our capabilities in this area include setting controls, topography surveys, construction staking, Airports GIS, Exhibit ‘ A’ property maps, property surveys, and more. Having these capabilities in-house means Jviation does not have to contract as extensively with subconsultants, thereby saving our clients’ money.

Future Aeronautical/ Non-Aeronautical Development
The use of land on and around airport property may have a dramatic impact on the development and protability of the airport. Developing consensus and acceptance from stakeholders on properties that should be released from airport management is a common oversight. Non-aeronautical, yet compatible development not only increases airport revenue, it strengthens the relationship the airport has with the community by allowing opportunity and reducing the risk of potential incompatible use.

Specic to this contract, our team can detail existing land uses and applicable regulations in the vicinity of the airport. Identifying both TVL-owned property and off-airport land uses and regulations, our work will include reviewing local zoning ordinances, development codes and comprehensive plans. As mentioned before, Hilary Fletcher will be a key team member helping conduct planning charrettes and leading discussion groups to build consensus. We will work in concert with Airport and City staff, including the Airport Land Use Commission and City Community Development Department, to release certain areas for non-aeronautical development and market them to the private sector.

The professional staff at Jviation have met or exceeded our expectations with every project they have been involved. It is clear that Jviation’s philosophy of customer service is based upon a strong team concept that is key to any project’s overall success.

Jim Elwood, Airport Director
Jackson Hole Airport
Former Director of Aviation, Aspen- Pitkin County Airport) C-103-2022 211
10 Agency Coordination
Meetings with the FAA, Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) and other agencies will also be key to the success of TVL planning projects. The Jviation Team offers a diverse set of highly qualied professionals with the depth of expertise to develop physically, and nancially realistic plans implemented through AIP. With a team that includes former FAA Northwest Mountain Region’s Airport Division Manager Donna Taylor, former FAA Terminal Assistant District Manager - Rocky Mountain Region Greg Dyer, and former FAA Denver ADO Director Craig Sparks, Jviation can claim an unmatched knowledge of local, state, and FAA policies and procedures relating to the AIP, providing TVL with support through the maze of FAA policies and procedures. Our long-term relationships developed within the FAA extend throughout FAA headquarters, airports division, air trafc, airway facilities, ight standards, and ight procedures ofces. Jviation will confer with TVL management and take advantage of these relationships when necessary.

Airport environmental consultant, ESA, Inc. is on the Jviation team to provide seamless support of the complex environmental analysis for the Lake Tahoe Airport including support for the contemplated Airport Master Plan.

They will lead the documentation, analysis and outreach required for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance as well as coordination with TRPA. ESA is currently part of the Jviation Team working on the TVL on-call engineering contract.

Benet Cost Analysis and Business Development Materials
Conducting a return on investment and/ or benet-cost analysis, even if not required by the FAA, can be a valuable decision- making tool when it comes to justifying and prioritizing projects. Whether through a master planning process or a standalone project, Jviation has experience conducting these studies to help airports, cities, state, and federal agencies understand the cost implications and gains produced from a project. The study begins with identifying the goals and objectives of the project followed by a listing of project alternatives.

Next, methods and measures to quantify costs and benets within a given time frame are determined and carried out. Once costs and benets are converted into a common value, a sensitivity analysis is performed to understand the effects of various possible outcomes. Based on all of this information, a recommended alternative (even if it includes the option to do nothing) can be chosen.

Jviation has a wealth of experience in developing business plans, marketing assessments, minimum standards, and other airport management guiding documents. Our assistance in this area begins with understanding the client’s needs. We interview the airport manager on any issues with currently established documentation and develop a course of action that meets the client needs. Next, we review any existing documentation and provide any recommendations ranging from line-item edits to full rewrites. Examples from previous work is referenced as well as materials produced by similarly sized airports. Then, materials are reviewed by the airport, city management and legal team, with edits and revision made before they are presented to and adopted by city government. While this may sound like a simple process, Jviation understands, through experience, that this can sometimes be a contentious process. The establishment of leases as well as rates and charges follow a similar path whereby common industry practices are important references in the process. Jviation has performed statewide rates and charges studies ( in Wyoming for example) and understands the full range of rates and charges common to airports like TVL.

By their nature, airports can be powerful economic generators for their associated sponsors and host communities. The primary goal of an economic impact study is to educate the non-aviation public on the economic bene ts an airport affords its community and state. In large part, an ancillary bene t for documenting these economic impacts is to garner support for both state and local funding. Jviation staff have over 40 years of experience in airport economics and the ability to document and effectively communicate the economic value airports have on state, regional, and local economies. In addition to the quanti cation and documentation of direct on-airport and visitor impacts, our studies also address air cargo activity, the implication associated with major capital projects, impact allocation among various districts or counties and business sectors, impacts associated with aerospace manufacturing, military and aviation- services, tax revenues C-103-2022 212
11 generated by aviation activities, or the benet to the airport sponsors stemming from increased passenger trafc. Finally, beyond just the hard-economic numbers, our studies tell the story of the airport – in what personal value it brings to the people in the communities, and in improvements to quality of life, safety, and education.

Economic Development Opportunities
As mentioned earlier, Jviation takes a focused view on airport facility capacity and utilization. A key step in any planning exercise is to understand the existing and future potential of an asset. Matching the capabilities of an asset to economic development opportunities increases the utilization of property and helps improve nancial self-sufciency of an airport. To maximize economic development opportunity, Jviation can engage local economic development leaders, Tahoe Chamber of Commerce, city leaders, developers, casino representatives and other local businesses to understand their needs, concerns, and opportunities for growth at the airport.

Jviation has a history of reaching out to groups and organizations like this to uncover prospects the Airport would otherwise not realize.

Sustainability
The Jviation team employs sustainable strategies and principles as a function of our holistic planning and design approach. We recognize that each of us plays a key role in supporting sustainability within the built environment and prioritizing those practices that will bene t our projects, the City, and the community.

Our collaboration philosophy ensures that our sustainability practices are applied consistently with every client and within the Jviation organization to maximize the bene t to the environmental, social, and economic bottom line. Regardless of what green goals a project pursues, long-term success is dened by a reduced environmental footprint ( carbon as well as impact to natural resources) from both users and operators.

Our team has built a reputation for planning and designing cost- effective, visually pleasing, and energy- efcient transportation facilities and development projects. Our team is familiar with local and federal sustainability programs and practices and has broad experience exploring sustainable development opportunities tailored to each client’s vision.

Our success in this area may be measured by various metrics or benchmarks:

Track carbon output to inform quanti able reduction strategies Examine energy use and maintenance requirements via facilities inventory and energy modeling Use natural daylighting in facilities to reduce electrical loads Analyze renewable energy options and funding initiatives specic to the region Analyze facility automated controls to target occupant use and extend system lifespan Investigate continuous building commissioning to extract savings over the life of each facility Develop a safe, efcient process for material production, use, and destruction— especially for future development
Develop a facilities/ equipment maintenance road map grounded in sustainability Develop a long-term stormwater management plan to enable effective on-site water use Emergency Response and Recovery
As noted in your RFP, one of the strategic priorities for the City is improving community emergency preparedness with a focus on the threat from wildland res. Hilary Fletcher has extensive experience working with local governments and emergency response agencies to develop an emergency preparedness plan. As a former volunteer member of the Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District, she worked numerous incidents in varying roles as Public Information Ofcer, Planning Section Chief, and Incident Commander. She also aids in airport emergency planning including accident debriefs, lessons learned, tabletop and mock drill exercises, and agency reviews.

C-103-2022 213

3. PROJECT TEAM
The organizational chart below outlines the exceptional team we have assembled to provide On-Call Planning services for TVL. Our team provides the necessary skill sets to efciently complete your airport master plan and other projects and will prioritize TVL by ensuring staff and resource availability. We will serve as an extension of your staff, successfully coordinating and communicating the Airport’ s needs to the FAA and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics. Brief summary biographies of our key personnel are provided on the following page.

Full resumes of the full team are provided in the appendix.

LEGEND
JAV = Johnson Aviation
JVI = Jviation, a Woolpert Company
ESA = ESA Associates
WIL = Wildscape Engineering, Inc. (DBE)

TECHNICAL RESOURCES

PROJECT

DIRECTOR
Trav is Vallin JVI
CLIENT

LIAISON
Kirk Nielsen JVI

PROJECT

MANAGER
Ton y Davis JVI

AVIATION

PLANNING / FORECASTING
Trent Holder, CM JVI
Jim Miklas JVI

COST ESTIMATING /

ENGINEERING REVIEW
Jon Noble JVI

FINANCIAL

SUSTAINABILITY
Nick Johnson JAV

AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION

ANALYSIS
Greg Dyer JVI
Mike Hanowsky , PHD JVI

DBE COMPLIANCE
Mar isa Fluhr JVI

TERMINAL PLANNING
Adam Acr ee JVI
Jordan Futch JVI
Bolded, light blue names indicate Key Personnel

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

COORDINATION / FACILITATION
Hilary Fletcher JVI

AGENCY COORDINATION
Ton y Davi s
JVI
Chris Jones ESA
Hilary Fletcher JVI
Carol Beah an, PE, QSD, QISP WIL

ENVIRONMENTAL /

SUSTAINABILITY
Chris Jones ESA
Jean-Chri stop he Dick ESA
Aut umn War d
ESA
Morgan Einspahr JVI

COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Hil ary Fletch er JVI
Carol Beah an, PE,

QSD, QISP
WIL
12 C-103-2022 214

KEY PERSONNEL
Tony Davis | Project Manager & Agency Coordination
Tony brings TVL over 29 years of airport- focused planning expertise. He has completed 50+ airport planning studies for airports throughout the United States, including serving as the Project Manager for Jviation’ s current TVL On-Call Planning contract. Throughout his career, he has prepared comprehensive planning studies, master plans, layout plans, statewide system plans, feasibility studies, forecasting, alternatives development, minimum standards, and land use compatibility studies. Tony offers these robust technical skills to TVL.

Kirk Nielsen | Client Liaison
Kirk has served as a client liaison to TVL since 2018. He is highly knowledgeable of TVL’s operating environment and the City’s vision for the Airport. Through his work at TVL, Kirk holds strong relationships with the FAA ADO and Caltrans Aeronautics. He will support the contract with CIP development.

Jon Noble | Engineering
Jon has 13 years of experience in the aviation industry and has been supporting TVL’s engineering needs since 2017. Jon brings extensive knowledge of FAA construction and has managed and/ or provided Quality Control and Quality Assurance testing. He will support the On-Call Planning services is cost estimating services that align with industry and regional trends.

Greg Dyer | Airspace Obstruction Analysis
Greg brings 36 years of experience in airspace and obstruction analysis. He provides Jviation’s clients with airspace analysis, air space routing, unmanned aircraft systems, and capacity/ efciency enhancements. He has supported efforts at TVL since 2017 and will continue to lead the evaluation and analysis of potential obstructions at TVL.

Nick Johnson | Financial Sustainability
Nick has over 30 years of experience and is a Complex Strategy Advisor providing airport land use, regulatory, facilities, and nancial project solutions. He is based in California and is highly familiar with the state’s regulatory requirements. Nick has a unique skill set in property redevelopment and land use compatibility near airports that he will bring to TVL.

Chris Jones | Environmental & Agency Coordination
Chris has over two decades of project management experience, including 17 years in the environmental eld. He has been working at TVL and the surrounding community for years and has extensive knowledge of the challenges the region faces. His technical experience includes preparing aviation- related noise, air quality, greenhouse gas, and land use studies.

Hilary Fletcher | Community Outreach & Emergency Preparedness Coordination Hilary has 33 years of experience in public outreach and has been supporting TVL with government and community outreach since 2017. Hilary also aids airports in emergency planning including accident debriefs, lessons learned, tabletop and mock drill exercises, and agency reviews.

Carol Beahan | Community Outreach
Carol’s ofce is located within TVL and she is highly familiar with the airport and community.

While formally educated in Civil Engineering and Zoology, Carol has also become an expert in community outreach and securing stakeholder support.
13 C-103-2022 215
14 JVIATION OVERVIEW
Jviation is a planning, engineering, design, architecture, and construction management rm focused on aviation- related projects. This focus provides TVL with a team of professionals that possess an in-depth understanding of the aviation industry and the dynamics and legalities of working at airports from every angle.

Several members of our staff have direct experience as private pilots as well as previously serving as airport, county, state aeronautics, and FAA employees. This experience and knowledge allows us to bring a unique perspective regarding development issues when planning and implementing your projects.

Our team doesn’ t just follow the traditional approach to planning projects. The holistic approach we will bring to your technical and business challenges includes value- added resources skilled in state and federal funding, economic development, airspace analysis, public policy, community engagement, partnering facilitation, and government relations.
165+

AVIATION

FOCUSED

EMPLOYEES

SERVING
95+

AIRPORT

CLIENTS
600+

AVIATION PROJECTS

COMPLETED IN
THE PAST 10 YEARS
WITH
C-103-2022 216
15 Airport Layout Plans
ALPs)
Airport Master Plans
Feasibility Studies and
Business Plans
Financial Planning
Airspace and
Approach Analysis
KTGNF 1RGTCVKQPCN
Assessments and
Plans
Industrial and Business
Park Planning and
Design
Land Use and Height
QPKPI 1TFKPCPEGU
Capital Improvement
Geographic
Information Systems
and eALP
Sustainability Planning
Innovative Revenue

KXGTUKECVKQP
Planning
Site Selection Studies
Landside Planning
Terminal and Facility
Planning
Passenger Terminal
Development
Interior Design
Security Systems,
Telecommunications
and Building
Automation
Airport special system
facility design
baggage, security, IT)
Equipment
5RGEKECVKQPU
Programming and
Planning
TSA Checkpoint
Design
Hold Room and Jet
Bridge Design
ARFF Facilities
SRE Facilities
Airport Design
Guidelines
9C[PFKPI CPF
Signage
Sustainable and High
Performance Design
Categorical Exclusion
Forms
Environmental
Assessments
Environmental Impact
Statements
Wetlands Studies
Management of
Wetlands Mitigation
Noise Modeling and
Studies
KTGNF 1RGTCVKQPCN
Assessments and Plans
Cultural Resources/
Historic Preservation
Air Emissions
Inventories
Air Quality/
Greenhouse Gas
Inventory Studies
Fugitive Dust
Permitting
Stormwater
Management Plans
USACE Section 404
Permits
Wildlife Hazard
Assessments and
Management Plans
Runway and Taxiway
Extensions and New
Construction
Airport Pavement
Evaluation and Design
Pavement
Rehabilitation and
Reconstruction
Roadway and Auto
Parking Design
Safety Area Expansion
and Grading
Apron Expansions
Deicing Facilities
Drainage Analysis and
Design
Fueling Facilities

KTGNF CPF CPFUKFG
Electrical
NAVAID and Visual Aid
Installation
Landscape Design
Surveying

UAS/ UAM
Technologies
Airport Management
Best Practices
Airport Compliance
Business and Strategic
Plans
KTRQTV 1RGTCVKQPU
Minimum Standards
Presentation and
Meeting Materials
ARFF Analysis

KTRQTV GTVKECVKQP
Manuals
PFC Applications
Public Involvement /
Community Relations
DBE Program
Development
Land Acquisition
Airspace Analysis
NextGen
Implementation

AIRPORT PLANNING

ARCHITECTURE AND

FACILITIES PLANNING

ENVIROMENTAL

PLANNING

ENGINEERING AND

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

ADDITIONAL

SERVICES

OUR SERVICE CAPABILITIES
Jviation understands the operational, nancial, and environmental challenges facing airports today. We focus on developing solutions that best address an airport’s opportunities, its physical limitations, its users’ needs, and the community it serves. A full listing of our team’s capabilities is shown below.

C-103-2022 217

ENVIRONMENTAL TEAMING PARTNER
Environmental Science Associates ( ESA)
ESA is a professional services consulting rm specializing in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) documentation, environmental studies, planning, permitting, and landscape architecture. The company was founded in 1969, shortly before enactment of both NEPA and CEQA. ESA is a 100% employee owned rm whose core values promote sustainability and responsible environmental management.

With over 500 professionals located across the United States, ESA is both large enough to offer a full range of services and small enough to provide personalized service. Their nimble, multidisciplinary teams bring project-specic expertise to the local level.

ESA is TVL’s current on-call environmental consultant and a strong partner with Jviation.

ESA and Jviation have worked jointly at TVL over the past four years as a blended team supporting all of TVL’s needs. This strong working relationship translates to an efcient delivery team for TVL.

ESA has distinguished itself from many other environmental rms through the establishment of an Airports Group: a dedicated aviation consulting practice within ESA that serves airports nationwide. This team applies practical, interdisciplinary solutions to resolve environmental issues speci c to airport projects in California alone. ESA has completed more than 200 successful airport projects. In addition to their excellent partnerships with many airport clients, ESA also has extensive experience and valuable relationships with the FAA and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics.

ESA incorporates the latest national industry perspectives to their work. Their staff are experts in navigating both federal and state regulatory processes and stay informed of changes that arise as the regulatory process evolves. The company is actively assisting the FAA in developing national noise policy through the Policy, Engineering, Analysis, and Research Support ( PEARS II) contract. This work provides valuable insight into the evolution of national policy relative to the airport environment. ESA has also played a critical role in both leading and supporting research conducted under the TRB Airport ACRP. This research provides unique insights into industry best practices and the direction of future FAA regulatory guidance.
50 Years of
Environmental
Documentation
150
Airports
Served
5 Northern
California
Ofces
85%
Clients are
Repeat
Business
16 C-103-2022 218

FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY TEAMING PARTNER
Johnson Aviation Consulting
Johnson Aviation is a small business enterprise (SBE) that provides strategic land use and facilities planning, business planning, and lease negotiations for the airport industry.

They offer their public and private clients a range of services, from program management and business process improvement to litigation support. Whether large hub or general aviation airport, they understand the unique considerations for airside and landside development, project entitlements, the surrounding airspace, and environmental requirements. The Johnson Aviation team has been working on airport projects since 1990 and with its network of partners can create individualized approaches for projects of every scope and size.

Johnson Aviation has extensive experience working with the FAA on national policy development and at the local airport level. Their specialty is land development, and they work closely with the owners/ developers and local government to meet the demands of economic and population growth while protecting the airport environment. Aviation safety is their priority when balancing the needs of airport operators, landowners and project developers interested in tapping the full potential of the airport economic engine.

Nick Johnson founded Johnson Aviation in 2004 to provide leadership on high prole and contentious aviation projects. His work at Los Angeles International Airport and San Diego International Airport cleared the way for multi- billion- dollar development programs at each facility. The company’ s clients include the FAA, many large hub and general aviation airports, Boeing, NASA, Google’ s parent company, Alphabet, major landowners, developers, cities, and federal- government contractors.

Jviation has leveraged Johnson Aviation’ s expertise on numerous planning projects throughout the western region, including projects at Colorado Springs Airport, Eagle County Regional Airport, and Palmdale Regional Airport.

Johnson Aviation is located at 6524 Deerbrook Road, Oak Park, CA 91377 17 C-103-2022 219

COMMUNITY OUTREACH TEAMING PARTNER
Wildscape Engineering, Inc.

Located at TVL, Wildscape Engineering, Inc. (Wildscape) is a boutique firm focused on engineering with a unique expertise in public outreach. This female- owned firm is located at TVL and is highly familiar with your needs and community. Outside of gaining community support, Wildscape has a distinct understanding of seniorlevel civil, restoration and geotechnical engineers and hydrologists experienced in the planning, design and construction of stream and wetland restoration, storm water management, and recreation and trail improvement projects. They specialize in engineering and environmental services focused on solutions to preserve, protect, and promote ecological health and environmental benefits. Wildscape has expertise in, ecological restoration planning, engineering design, hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, construction oversight, and construction inspection and monitoring.

Wildscape excels in identifying sound, innovative yet practical, engineering solutions that best serve the needs of natural and designed systems. They have wide-ranging expertise from watershed scale conceptual planning to construction implementation within challenging environments such as an active river channel or steep ravine.

Wildscape is a certified small business (# 00055445) and Certified Underutilized/ Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ( UDBE/ DBE # 37803) established in May 2008 with offices in South Lake Tahoe and the San Francisco Bay Area. The president, Carol Beahan, PE, QSD, QISP has over twenty years of stormwater and watershed and wetlands restoration engineering and planning experience in the Lake Tahoe Basin and northern California. She has managed multi- disciplinary teams to conduct feasibility studies for wetland and water quality improvement projects, stormwater drainage, fish passage, wildlife habitat, transportation, and recreation planning. Ms. Beahan develops and implements engineering design plans, specifications, cost estimates, bid packages and pre-and post- construction mitigation monitoring plans. She has provided impacts and opportunities and constraints analysis for various environmental regulatory documents and permits. She has provided designs and construction oversight for numerous high profile river and wetland restoration projects within the Tahoe Basin and Truckee areas and has successfully led productive public and stakeholder meetings and community workshops. She is QSP/ QSD and QISP- certified and has provided SWPPP development and site monitoring for numerous local private and public construction projects. 18 C-103-2022 220

4. PAST OR CURRENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Through our work on similar planning projects, Jviation brings unique perspectives, understanding, objectivity, and experience to the development of TVL’s master plan and On-Call Planning services. A sampling of our planning and environmental experience over the past 10 years is provided in the table below, while a more indepth view of selected projects is shown on the following pages.

Projects
Air eld PlanningLandside PlanningTerminal/ Facility PlanningFinancial PlanningEnvironmental PlanningAirspace PlanningPublic/ Community OutreachALP Drawing SetCommercial Service FAA Denver ADO Coordina onEagle County
Regional Airport, Master Plan, CO Aspen- Pitkin
County Airport, Various Planning, CO Archuleta County
Airport, Master Plan, CO Central Colorado Regional Airport, Master Plan,
CO Colorado Plains Municipal Airport, Master Plan, CO
Colorado
Springs Airport, Master Plan and Land
Use Study, CO Durango-La Plata County Regional
Airport, Master Plan, CO Front Range Airport,
Master
Plan, CO Greeley- Weld County Regional
Airport, Master Plan, CO Gunnison- Crested
Butte Regional
Airport, Master Plan, CO Lamar Municipal Airport,
Master Plan, CO Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport,
Airport Layout Plan, CO Yampa Valley
Regional Airport, Master Plan, CO Jackson
Hole Airport, Various Planning Initiatives, WY
Laramie
Regional Airport, Master Plan, WY Riverton Regional
Airport, Master Plan, WY Rocksprings- Sweetwater Regional Airport, Master Plan, WY Driggs-Reed Memorial
Airport, Master Plan, ID Spring eld-Branson
National Airport, Master Plan, MO Elko
Regional Airport, Master Plan, NV
Carbon
County Regional Airport, 221
20 LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT ( TVL)
On-Call Planning

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA
Obstruction Mitigation Plan and Aeronautical Study
TVL is located on the south shore of Lake Tahoe. The communities surrounding Lake Tahoe have high environmental standards and highly dened environmental processes. The Lake Tahoe Basin is a unique area that is world- renowned for natural beauty and outdoor activities. This context begins to dene the decision- making environment in the Lake Tahoe Airport vicinity.

The city of South Lake Tahoe completed the Obstruction Mitigation Plan and Aeronautical Study for in August 2017. The study was part of an effort to identify and address possible obstructions in areas critical aircraft safety, operation, and navigation to and from TVL. The results of the study identi ed extensive ground and tree penetration of critical surfaces in relation to Runway 18/ 36.

Jviation was selected to expand this study to determine an appropriate phasing and prioritization for easement acquisition and clearing of the identi ed obstructions. The study of the complex, mountainous terrain and extensive vegetation was highly technical; our task was to describe the complex interactions between ight procedures, airspace surfaces, and costs in an easy- to-understand narrative that claried priorities and helped combine ADO and the Airport efforts to build a funding plan.

The Tahoe environment includes multiple governmental jurisdictions, as well as numerous environmental organizations. Our work on the study was designed to organize the technical survey data into effective presentations that were easily understood by large spectrum of stakeholders.

Rates and Charges Study
Lake Tahoe Airport must ensure that its rates and charges are appropriately set based on fair market values. The Airport facilities provide leased spaces for airport business operators, aircraft owners, and City ofces among others, in its former commercial service terminal building.

Jviation is producing a Rates and Charges Study that includes an analysis of comparable airports rates and charges, local leasing rates to evaluate the current structure to determine if any adjustments are warranted.

C-103-2022 222
21 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT ( EGE)
Various Planning Initiatives

GYPSUM, CO
Airport Master Plan
Jviation successfully completed EGE’s 2014 Airport Master Plan.

Key efforts included inventorying facilities, updating base mapping, forecasting general aviation and commercial activity, preparing a facility requirements assessment, developing a 20-year CIP and funding strategies, assessing the environmental impacts, providing effective outreach to the public and stakeholders, and updating the ALP drawings.

The plan also included airside geometry analyses, approach analyses, landside trafc ow and parking analyses, and ultimately set the stage for the most recent terminal redevelopment.

Approach Procedures
Jviation worked with EGE and a large group of professionals from all aspects of the industry, including the FAA, commercial airlines, and general aviation experts, to develop new departure procedures for Runway 25. These new procedures are providing better and safer options for aircraft ying in and out of EGE. While the newest technology improves safety buffers, the fundamental challenge remains the same— how to guide the pilots and aircraft through the mountains. This project provided guidance to keep the aircraft over the lowest part of the valley and centered between the highest points of terrain.

Emergency Response Preparedness
Jviation actively assisted EGE in conducting its tri-annual FSE in 2017. The effort included components for area emergency response organizations and agencies, selected medical facilities, county and municipal representatives, and other selected entities. The exercise was designed to demonstrate and evaluate the area’s capability to respond to a Mass Causality Incident at the airport. During high-stress incidents, effective emergency response comes from well-trained and prepared personnel.

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE WORK
Airport master planning
Environmental planning
Terminal/ facility planning
Landside planning
Sustainability
Public outreach and
engagement
Forecasting
Approach analysis
Emergency training
Local agency coordination
FAA coordination and
compliance
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
C-103-2022 223
22 COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT ( COS)
Various Planning Initiatives

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
Land Use Compatibility Study
As an enabling project to the Airport Master Plan, Jviation rst completed a Land Use Compatibility Study to analyze existing and planned land uses on and around the Airport to ensure that both the airport and the community can continue to thrive and grow in harmony during the community’ s signicant growth. The primary challenge of this project was to address the pending development near the Airport. The Airport and City were concerned that existing land use controls were not adequate to allow for future airport growth in the face of encroachment. To meet the needs of this challenge, Jviation leveraged industry leading experts in the area of land use and property legal issues. The team established denable guidelines for over 80 land uses surrounding the Airport as well as determined a procedure the Airport’s staff and board could follow in reviewing land use applications. The study made recommendations to jurisdictions surrounding the Airport to implement land use policies as well as zoning and building ordinances that balance the current and projected future needs of the Airport with the needs of the community and property owners. The project developed new airport noise contours based on forecasted activity levels and overall airport capacity. An extensive outreach campaign was created as a part of the project to gain critical input from neighboring jurisdictions and Airport Advisory Commission members.

Airport Master Plan
In 2021, Jviation initiated a new Airport Master Plan for COS, the rst full update since 2013. Since the last update, Colorado Springs had experienced rapid development across the City and County, including on and immediately adjacent to the Airport. A new master plan was recommended to ensure FAA design standards are met so that proposed improvements remain eligible for future federal airport improvement grants.

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE WORK
Land use planning
Airport master planning
Environmental planning
Terminal/ facility planning
Landside planning
Sustainability
Public outreach and
engagement
Forecasting
Noise
Cost estimating
Local agency coordination
FAA coordination and
compliance
C-103-2022 224
23 ASPEN- PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT ( ASE)
Future Air Service Planning Study

ASPEN, CO
The Future Air Service Planning Study analyzed industry trends, air service market options, and aireld/ airspace conguration alternatives to ensure that ASE remains viable with the forecasted changes in the industry.

Initially, the study team developed 18 alternatives which were evaluated during three separate stakeholder meetings. As a result of the evaluation, two alternatives emerged for further study. Both alternatives can facilitate next generation regional commercial aircraft operations and meet the Airport’ s goal of complete operational freedom on the east side (void of any restrictions)
Design Guidelines
This project implemented a set of design guidelines to ensure that future airport development and redevelopment is consistent with community values and reects high standards for architectural quality, environmental sensitivity, neighborhood compatibility, and sustainability.

The ASE design guidelines are structured to address all on-airport improvements through a tiered approach. Several considerations informed the development of the design guidelines: airport security and operational requirements, quality of service and experience for airport users, scenic view planes, and other land use requirements requested by the community.

Terminal Area Plan ( TAP)
Although the commercial terminal building had undergone one major addition and major system repair, the terminal area at ASE needed to be redesigned and upgraded. ASE’s needs were evaluated and alternatives were developed to meet current and projected demand, satisfy code compliance upgrades, improve to facility systems in disrepair, improve passenger experience, evaluate intermodal transportation, and minimize their environmental footprint. The plan consists of an evaluation of the existing terminal, landside and airside areas; forecast preparation; facility requirements and space programming; alternatives evaluation; and other tasks.

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE WORK
Aireld/airspace planning
Terminal/ facility planning
Design guidelines
Sustainability
Public outreach and
engagement
Cost estimating
Local agency coordination
FAA coordination and
compliance
C-103-2022 225
24 JACKSON HOLE AIRPORT (JAC)

JACKSON, WY
Conceptual Area Plan
Jackson Hole Airport’ s location within the Grand Teton National Park presents unique challenges for meeting the evolving needs of the airport’s aviation users and businesses. The Conceptual Area Plan’s (CAP) goal was to determine the highest and best use of the limited space within the Development Sub-Zone, while nding a balance to accommodate the future needs of commercial service and general aviation activity at the airport. The CAP ultimately identi ed a preferred development strategy that most efciently utilizes the space available for future commercial aircraft operations, general aviation operations, ARFF and snow removal operations, a rental car service facility, and other facilities, such as parking for airport users and rental cars. The CAP also included a space reservation for future expansion of the existing airline passenger terminal as identi ed in previous airport studies, and documents existing facilities and infrastructure, including the expected life cycle of each facility.

Existing conditions were compared to an estimate of demand for hangars, aprons, and automobile parking, with the resulting development and redevelopment strategy identi ed to meet JAC’s needs.

GUNNISON- CRESTED BUTTE REGIONAL AIRPORT
GUC)

GUNNISON, CO
Airport Master Plan
Jviation completed the Airport Master Plan for GUC that focused on several speci c issues. First, existing terminal building constraints were identi ed, alternatives were developed, and an evaluation of alternatives to either rehabilitate the existing building or build a new terminal was conducted.

The analysis also included evaluating the vehicle parking lot, airport access road, and bus loading areas. Next, a detailed and extensive air service market analysis was prepared that included potential growth opportunities, the impact of recent changes in the airline industry, the potential to increase air service in the summer seasons as well as during winter months.

The Dallas and Houston markets were identi ed as the greatest potential for future service growth for GUC. Lastly, the Master Plan implemented a broad- reaching public coordination program to ensure that all interested parties were aware of the plan and had an opportunity to provide their input. In addition, the Airport Master Plan was integrated with parallel planning efforts by both the City of Gunnison and Gunnison County.

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE WORK
Development strategy
Airside and landside planning
Facility analysis
Environmental sustainability
Extensive agency coordination
FAA coordination and
compliance

KEY ELEMENTS OF THE WORK
Airport master planning
Environmental planning
Terminal/ facility planning
Landside planning
Public outreach and
engagement
Forecasting
Air service market analysis
Local agency coordination
FAA coordination and
compliance
C-103-2022 226

5. REFERENCES

JACKSON HOLE AIRPORT
Jim Elwood, AAE
Airport Manager
1250 E. Airport Rd | Jackson, WY 83001
307.733.7695
Jelwood@jacksonholeairport. com

COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT
Greg Philips, AAE
Director of Aviation
7770 Milton E. Proby Parkway | Colorado Springs, CO 80916 719.550.1900
Gphillips@springsgov. com

ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL AIRPORT
Paul Anslow
Airport Manager
11755 Airport Way | Broom eld, CO 80021
303.271.4851
Panslow@ yrmma. com

DRIGGS REED MEMORIAL AIRPORT
Lori Kyle
Manager
P.O. Box 146 | Driggs, ID 83422
208.715.0439
Lkyle@driggsidaho. org
25 C-103-2022 227

6. EXPERIENCE IN NAVIGATING CALIFORNIA

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO DELIVER AIRPORT

CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT / REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
The Jviation team has extensive experience navigating California regulatory requirements through our work at TVL and throughout the state. Below are a few examples of our experience.

TVL OBSTRUCTION MITIGATION PROJECT
This study was part of an effort to identify and address possible obstructions in areas critical aircraft safety, operation, and navigation to and from TVL. The results of the study identied extensive ground and tree penetration of critical surfaces in relation to Runway 18/ 36.

Jviation was selected to expand this study to determine an appropriate phasing and prioritization for easement acquisition and clearing of the identi ed obstructions. The study of the complex, mountainous terrain and extensive vegetation was highly technical; our task was to describe the complex interactions between ight procedures, airspace surfaces, and costs in an easy- to-understand narrative that claried priorities and helped combine ADO and the Airport efforts to build a funding plan.

LONG BEACH AIRPORT, NEW AIRFIELD LAYOUT
While employed at another rm, an ESA team member helped prepare a new aireld layout for Long Beach Airport. The new aireld design was based on the latest FAA guidance in Advisory Circular 150/ 5300-13A and Engineering Brief 75, and the layout mitigated multiple FAA-identied hot-spots. The proposed changes reduced the number of taxiway/ runway interactions, improved aireld geometry to increase pilot acuity, and increased available area for on-airport development. The changes were proposed and approved by the City Council of Long Beach and formed the core of Long Beach Airport’s aireld capital improvements for a decade.

Many improvements have already been implemented, allowing for the elimination of several hot-spots on the aireld.

SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, NEW T1 PROJECT
Johnson Aviation provided demand and capacity analysis expertise for the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) project Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project environmental team leveraged their extensive knowledge of airport operations and physical constraints to justify the Terminal 1 replacement project, advance it through the environmental process, and ensure the justication withstood legal challenge. The T1 project budget of $3.4 billion represents one of the single largest capital investment projects in California Airports over the last decade. The combination of airport- speci c knowledge and California regulatory experience provided by Johnson Aviation offers design teams and clients a strategic advantage in considering the full range of develop options.

ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OWNERSHIP TRANSFER
Johnson Aviation led the transfer of ownership to the Ontario International Airport Authority and met all regulatory, nancial, legal, environmental, and operational due diligence necessary to satisfy California and federal requirements. The combination of knowledge, focus, and tenacity to plan for the ownership transfer while creatively solving problems as they emerged in the complicated and uncertain process is a hallmark of the unique services Johnson Aviation provides to airport clients throughout California. 26 C-103-2022 228

LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Johnson Aviation led the LAX Master Plan to complete the regulatory entitlements for the complete redevelopment of California’ s leading international gateway airport. This foundational planning effort produced the federal, State, and local approvals necessary to design and construct nearly $ 20 billion in transformative airport infrastructure. Planning entitlements included a general plan amendment to the City of Los Angeles General Plan and the rst ever LAX Speci c Plan ordinance to implement zoning regulations for the Master Plan elements. Johnson Aviation understanding of the California land use regulatory environment offers clients the deepest skill set available for airport planning and development understanding that clears the way to actual project construction.

CALIFORNIA PACIFIC ELECTRIC
COMPANY’ S (CALPECO) 625 AND
650 ELECTRICAL LINE UPGRADE

PROJECT EIR/ EIS
Wildscape Engineering, Inc. provided the
hydrology and water quality analysis for the
combined Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and
Environmental Impact Statement ( EIS) under the
California Public Utilities Commission, USDA Forest
Service, and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
leads. Under the proposed project, several miles
of new electrical utility line were to be constructed
over steep mountainous terrain within two pristine alpine watersheds, and would cross several creeks, drainages, and wetland areas. An approved hydrology and soils specialist report, per USFS requirements and several maps, were produced as part of the assessment effort and Project construction was completed in 2017.

ARROYO DEL VALLE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FEASIBILITY

STUDY, FINAL DESIGN, CEQA, PERMITTING AND

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Carol Beahan, PE and Wildscape Engineering completed a feasibility study and conceptual design ( 1st Phase) for a proposed bridge across the Arroyo Del Valle Alameda County, CA to connect two popular regional park trails. Wildscape managed a multidisciplinary team and collaborated with several stakeholder groups: East Bay Regional, the Livermore Area... and the USGS. The team identi ed feasible alternative alignments for a multi- use bridge over Arroyo Del Valle creek and developed conceptual designs, costs, and a permitting matrix for the preferred alternative. Topographic, geologic, soils, and stream gauge data were assessed along with dam operations and the FEMA regulatory oodplain to determine bridge height, span and structural needs, permitting requirements, and associated construction costs.

Wildscape managed the CEQA document and permit acquisitions and completed nal Phase 2 construction documents and permits in 2018. Permit were obtained via the FEMA regulatory process, a required Conditional Letter of Map Revision and Letter of Map Revision ( CLOMR/ LOMR) necessitated development of the FEMA Effective model and revision of the area’s oodplain regulatory map. The full effort delivered a bridge design that complied with oodplain management regulations, connected several trails, and was aesthetically appropriate for the park setting. The bridge was constructed and dedicated to a popular county supervisor in 2019.
27 C-103-2022 229

7. GOOD FAITH EFFORT IN INCLUDING DBE’S
Jviation is committed to ensuring diversity and inclusion opportunities. We have established strong working relationships with a variety of small and disadvantaged rms throughout the US, with an emphasis on minority-, women-, and veteran- owned businesses.

We strive to provide mentoring and expansion opportunities, so minority or disadvantaged consultants can access broader experiences and future teaming potential. A more diverse pool of consultants adds value to our clients’ projects by increasing competition and creating space for new perspectives. Building these partnerships helps clients discover new, capable rms that have no previous work history in the area. This allows major/ prime consultants more opportunities to work and develop partnerships with rms who provide value and greater bench strength to the team.

Jviation is committed to leveraging DBE rms on this contract. We believe that DBE rms are a vital component of the team and their involvement benets the South Lake Tahoe community. Our team is invested in expanding the opportunities available to DBE’s and helping them grow. Our current DBE team member is:

Wildscape Engineering, Inc. for public and community outreach support services.

GOOD FAITH EFFORT OVERVIEW
Jviation will implement the following actions to achieve a high degree of participation of DBE rms:

Identify elements of the work to be performed by our
DBE partners.

Identify opportunities for additional participation in
services that Jviation typically self-performs.

Initiate a communication plan and project team
meetings to fully integrate and collaborate with our
partner firms.

If work elements arise that require a specialized
field, our team will identify and vet qualified firms for inclusion in the project
Ensure a successful plan by promptly paying DBE
subcontractors. We also provide the required
language in all contracts to ensure prompt payment is
made by the prime contractors.

Jviation will assist TVL throughout each project to
ensure the program has been administered in good
faith.

To ensure the individual project and year-end goals
have been satisfied and recorded, Jviation will track
and submit the required documentation to TVL at the
end of each project and at the end of TVL’s fiscal year.

Jviation is a leading proponent of DBE’s, and other small businesses in the development of transportation- related projects. We welcome the opportunity to provide rms with signicant and meaningful participation in our projects.

Jviation has extensive
experience working
with airport sponsors
and the FAA to ensure
compliance with
regulations of the
U.S. Department of
Transportation, 49 CFR
Part 26. We have a
dedicated DBE Program
Coordinator, Marisa
Fluhr, on staff that is
highly knowledgeable
of the compliance
requirements. She
supports numerous
airports, including TVL,
with managing their DBE
program.
28 C-103-2022 230
29 APPENDIX
C-103-2022 231
Bachelor of Science, Airway Science
Management
FAA- Certified Airport Safety
Inspector
FAA- Certified Rescue Fire
Fighter ( ARFF)
Private Pilot

TRAVIS VALLIN
Principal- in-Charge | Project Director
Travis has 27 years of experience managing complex aviation programs.

Previously with the Colorado Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division, where he was named to the Aeronautics Director’ s position in 1998, Travis served as the point of contact for the Governor, State Legislature and Colorado Department of Transportation on all aviation issues throughout the State. A major reason for Travis’ s success as Director was his thorough understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing the aviation industry, his ability to nd consensus on issues impacting airports on a wide variety of aviation issues, and his understanding of how each airport supports regional, statewide, and national aviation systems and economies. His work on The Colorado Surveillance Project is a prime example of his leadership in bringing local, regional, state, and national interests together to create an innovative and cost- effective method to improve safety and efciency within the National Airspace System.

Project Experience
Land Use Study
Colorado Springs Airport | Colorado Springs, CO
Principal
Strategic Business Plan
Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport | Broom eld, CO
Principal

KIRK NIELSEN
Client Liaison
Kirk has been managing complex airport projects and programs since 1996. Prior to joining Jviation, Kirk served as Program Manager and Aeronautical Planner for the Utah Department of Transportation’ s Division of Aeronautics ( UDOT Aeronautics). He supervised the state’s airport grant program and airport development throughout Utah from 2003 to August 2012. While working for UDOT, he served as Project Manager on the State System Plan, Programmatic Sensitive Species Habitat Management Plan, and the yearly CIP.

Kirk is currently the Ofce Manager of Jviation’s St. George ofce. He a Project Manager and Project Liaison for Jviation, and he coordinates all the CIPs with the states and FAA for the Jviation clients in California, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah.

Project Experience
Terminal Apron Rehabilitation
Lake Tahoe Airport | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Project Manager
Master Plan
St. George Regional Airport | St. George, UT
Project Manager
MBA
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering
Professional Engineer, UT, NV,
ID
30 C-103-2022 232

TONY DAVIS
Project Manager
Tony has been an aviation consultant since 1994, providing master planning, system planning, and economic impact analysis to airport and state clients throughout the country. For most of his career, he has served as a senior aviation project manager for airport planning projects and has led dozens of airport master plans throughout the United States and was responsible for all phases of the planning process. His development of short-, medium-, and long-term alternative concepts assist airports in understanding the phased construction of airport infrastructure while maintaining critical components of aireld operation, terminal and landside facilities.

Project Experience
Master Plan Update
Elko Regional Airport | Elko, NV
Project Manager
Master Plan
Driggs Reed Memorial Airport | Driggs, ID
Project Manager
MBA
BS, Aviation Business Management
AS, Aeronautical Science
FAA Flight Certi cates:

Commercial
Instrument
Private Pilot

TRENT HOLDER, CM
Aviation Planning
Trent is passionate about leveraging aviation planning to create scally intelligent and sustainable improvements for his clients. Trent focuses on creating highly accurate aviation trafc forecasts that breeze through FAA and State Aeronautics review. He is knowledgeable at collaborating with stakeholders and community partners to ensure completion of programmatic and scal contractual requirements. Growing up in his grandfather’ s hangar in northwest Wyoming, he is as comfortable in a boardroom as he is in a pilot’s lounge. Trent’s approachable style allows him to convey complex airport and regulatory topics in understandable terms.

Project Experience
Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan
Colorado Springs Airport | Colorado Springs, CO
Aviation Planner
Master Plan
Rangely Airport | Rangely, CO
Aviation Planner and Project Manager
MS, Forensic Psychology
BA, Psychology
31 C-103-2022 233

JIM MIKLAS
Aviation Planning
Jim is Jviation’s Manager of Aviation Planning and manages all facets of aviation planning projects for both commercial and general aviation airports throughout the United States. His efforts have extended from the strategic (i.e., state aviation system plans, economic impact studies, airport master plans, strategic business plans, etc.) to the tactical (i.e., survey and airspace analyses, easement acquisitions, site evaluations, etc.) for airports of all sizes and in various locales. His background as a private pilot and in xed-based operator services bolsters his understanding of the needs of pilots, airlines and airports.

Project Experience
Master Plan
Colorado Springs Airport | Colorado Springs, CO
Senior Planner
Master Plan
Cal Black Memorial Airport | Halls Crossing, UT
Project Manager
BS, Journalism

CHRIS JONES
Environmental
Chris has more than two decades of project management experience, including seventeen years of experience in the environmental eld as a project manager, technical lead, and author of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental documentation for various aviation, transportation, land use, and energy projects. He has a depth of experience in evaluating the environmental effects of airspace procedure changes including several Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA) Metroplex projects across the United States. He also has experience in the preparation of Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans for airports in the State of California. His technical experience includes preparing aviation- related noise, air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and land use studies. He has expertise in GIS and experience in the use of various modeling software used for noise and air quality analyses. In addition, Chris has experience coordinating agency consultation and project permitting with both federal, state, and local agencies.

Project Experience
Land Use Compatibility Plan Update
Lake Tahoe Airport | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Project Manager
Environmental Assessment and Initial Study/ Negative Declaration for Proposed Commercial Airline Service Project
Bishop Airport | Inyo County, CA
Project Manager
Juris Doctor
BA, Sociology
American Institute of Certified
Planners
AICP Certification
32 C-103-2022 234

JEAN- CHRISTOPHE DICK
Environmental
Jean-Christophe Dick is a multidisciplinary airport consultant with more than 15 years of experience in airport planning at medium and large hub airports across the United States. He has worked on airport master plans including in depth airport layout plan updates, terminal planning, and aireld geometry. Having worked on two of the rst Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA)–funded aireld geometry studies at the Long Beach and Tucson airports, Jean-Christophe is able to understand and apply principles of safer aireld geometry design at airports in the United States and abroad.

Project Experience
Aireld Geometry Study Phase I
Long Beach Airport | Long Beach, CA
Project Manager
On-Call Planning
San Diego International Airport | San Diego, CA
Deputy Project Manager
BS, Business & Technology
FAA Private Pilot
International Air Transport
Association Certificates
Aviation Law for Managers
Aviation Marketing
Aircraft Operating Lease
Contracts

AUTUMN WARD, CM, ENV SP
Environmental
Autumn has 18 years of experience in the aviation eld. She has a robust background in environmental planning, airport facility planning, and aviation safety. Her project experience has included facilities ranging from small general aviation airports to major large- hub air carrier airports in the United States and abroad. She is experienced with the Federal Aviation Administration and airport certication requirements and skilled in documenting and presenting the results of technical analyses in a manner that can be clearly understood by the public.

Project Experience
Part 150 Study and On-Call Services
Naples Municipal Airport | Naples, FL
Project Manager
New Airline Service Environmental Assessment
Bishop Airport | Bishop, CA
Project Director
MS, Aeronautics
BS, Aviation Business
Administration
Registrations:

American Association of
Airport Executives
Envision™ Sustainability
Professional and Verifier
33 C-103-2022 235

MORGAN EINSPAHR, LEED GA
Environmental
Morgan specializes in environmental planning for aviation-related projects, including NEPA document preparation, CatEx clearances, environmental assessments, public involvement, and airport master plans.

Morgan is a commercial and instrument rated-pilot, and has extensive hands-on experience in airport operations and aviation planning. She has prepared numerous specialized environmental studies in support of airport improvement or development projects, including cultural resource investigations, air quality modeling, wetlands delineations, endangered species surveys, and compatible land use planning studies.

Project Experience
Master Plan
Eagle County Regional Airport | Gypsom, CO
Environmental Planner
Environmental Assessment for Land Acquisition
Riverton Regional Airport | Riverton, WY
Environmental Planner
MS, Environmental Management
BS, Aviation Management

GREG DYER
Airspace/ Obstruction Analysis
Greg has worked with all aspects of aviation including military and unmanned aircraft systems. He spent 34 years with the FAA in Air Traf c Control Operations and Management. His experience includes leading ARTCC and tower facilities. Greg was the FAA lead for the Colorado WAM project and led the Denver ARTCC component of the Denver RNAV structure development. His FAA roles included Airspace and Procedures manager at Denver ARTCC, Trafc Management Ofcer and acting Facility Manager. His specialties include capacity and efciency planning at major hub airports and at mountainous airports.

As Rocky Mountain District Manager Greg oversaw the terminal facilities in Colorado, Montana, Utah and Wyoming, including 20 ATCT’ s and TRACON’ s. He was also an FAA Safety Management System lead responsible for Safety Risk determinations and instruction. His current projects include Commercial Space Site licensing, Advanced Air Mobility eVTOL), Unmanned Aircraft Systems and capacity planning for airports and airlines. He is currently involved in the North Dakota- Vantis Beyond Visual Line of Sight program for unmanned vehicles.

Project Experience
Obstruction & Mitigation Study
Lake Tahoe Airport | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Aviation/ Airspace Services Director
Instrument Department Procedure Development
Eagle County Regional Airport | Gypsum, CO
Aviation/ Airspace Services Director
BS, Public Administration
34 C-103-2022 236

MIKE HANOWSKY, PHD
Airspace/ Obstruction Analysis
Mike joined Woolpert’s Strategic Consulting Group in 2019 and will be available as a resource for your airport. He brings 20 years of experience in aviation, surface transportation, and facilities consulting. Mike’s technical work includes aireld and airspace modeling tools, aireld planning, passenger ow and terminal simulation, forecasting, aviation data science and advanced analytics, and decision analysis and software development for decision support tools. Mike is a former Science and Technology Fellow with the American Association for the Advancement of Science and a Fulbright Scholar. He holds a Doctorate degree and Master’s degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Project Experience
Aireld Simulation Analysis
John F. Kennedy International Airport | Queens, NY
Project Manager & Technical Lead
Airport Go-Arounds Analysis
City and County of San Francisco | San Francisco, CA
Project Director
PHD, Engineering
MS, Transportation & Operations
Research
BS, Industrial Engineering and
Operations Research

ADAM ACREE, LEED AP
Terminal Planning
Adam is an architectural designer and construction administrator with ten years of experience in the architecture industry. His experience includes designing elements for a variety of buildings and overseeing the construction activities in the eld. He has been involved with aviation, educational, commercial, and retail projects. Adam supports successful project delivery by working closely with contractors and coordinating construction efforts.

Project Experience
Terminal Expansion and Rehabilitation
Laramie Regional Airport | Laramie, WY
Architectural Phase Manager
Terminal Renovation
Jackson Hole Airport | Jackson, WY
Architectural Phase Manager
MS, Architecture
BS, Architectural Studies
35 C-103-2022 237

JORDAN FUTCH
Terminal Planning
Jordan brings seven years of architectural design experience. He began his career as a rebar detailer, providing him with a strong background in structural design. Prior to joining Jviation, Jordan worked as veterinarian architectural designer during which he designed and managed projects in the southeast United States. He is an Autodesk Certied Personnel and is currently pursuing architecture licensing.

Project Experience
Terminal Electrical Upgrades
Casper/ Natrona International Airport | Casper, WY
Architectural Designer
Ticket Counters
Jackson Hole Airport | Jackson, WY
Architectural Designer
MS, Architecture
AS, Science in Drafting

NICK JOHNSON
Financial Sustainability
Nick is a Complex Strategy Advisor leading airport land use, regulatory, facilities, and nancial project solutions. He has over 30 years of experience and expertise in airport planning and development at airports of all sizes. His experience includes project development on airports, nearby and through- the-fence by applying a broad array of expertise from business and nancial analysis to airspace and operational procedures improvement. He does so as a collaborator with teams of all sizes to meet client needs and expectations. Specialties include lease negotiations, business strategy, facilities planning, ownership transfer, environmental entitlements, regulatory certi cation, security planning, real estate strategy, and construction planning, Nick founded Johnson Aviation in 2004 providing leadership on high prole and contentious airport master planning and environmental projects.

Project Experience
Adaptive Property Reuse Study
Ontario International Airport | Ontario, CA
Master Plan Study
Los Angeles International Airport | Los Angeles, CA
Master of Public Administration
BS, Aviation Management
36 C-103-2022 238

JON NOBLE, PE
Engineering
Jon has 13 years of experience providing civil design, eld engineering, geotechnical engineering and materials testing services to clients throughout the United States. Prior to joining Jviation, Jon served as a Staff Engineer for a geotechnical engineering and materials testing rm. His experience includes managing laboratory accreditations and inspections, assisting his senior manager in supervising technical staff, and handling the day-to-day management of signicant projects i.e., establishing/ maintaining schedules and preparing/ reviewing correspondence). Jon has extensive knowledge of FAA construction and paperwork and has assisted in managing and/ or providing Quality Control and Quality Assurance testing.

Project Experience
General Aviation Apron Rehabilitation Phase 5
Lake Tahoe Airport | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Project Manager
De-Ice Pad/Apron
Aspen-Pitkin County Airport | Aspen, CO
Resident Engineer
BS, Engineering

HILARY FLETCHER
Community Outreach | Emergency Preparedness Coordination Hilary started her career in Pitkin County, Colorado in 1988, and served in numerous positions until her appointment to the County Manager position in 2001. She served as part of a ve-member Board of County Commissioners and held the position for 10 years. Hilary was responsible for leading and managing an organization of 240 employees with an 80-million annual budget. She leverages her public-policy experience to provide public engagement and policy support for numerous clients throughout the country. Her career includes numerous community facilitation projects, land use mediations, and community collaboration projects at the state, regional, and national levels. She has helped local governments, special districts, and non-prots address organizational issues, develop strategic plans, and conduct community outreach initiatives.

Project Experience
TVL Rates and Charges Study
Lake Tahoe Airport | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Project Manager
Emergency Preparedness Coordination
Eagle County Regional Airport | Gypsum, CO
Project Manager
Master of Public Administration
BA, American History
37 C-103-2022 239

CAROL BEAHAN, PE, QSD, QISP
Community Outreach
Carol is a registered civil engineer experienced in the planning, design and construction of river, wetland, and upland restoration and water quality improvement projects. She has managed multi- disciplinary teams to plan and design for drainage, water quality, recreation, habitat, and transportation improvements. Carol has developed and implemented SWPPPs, pre- and post- construction and mitigation monitoring plans, provided hydrology, water quality and flooding analyses for master plans and transportation environmental planning documents and acquired numerous constructions permits. Areas of expertise include stormwater drainage, river, wetland and habitat restoration planning, design, and implementation; construction documents and permitting.

Project Experience
Creek Restoration Project
Bijou Park | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Commercial Redevelopment Project
The Crossing | South Lake Tahoe, CA
BS, Civil Engineering
BS, Zoology
Registered Civil Engineer (CA)
Certified QSD/ QSP
d i h

MARISA FLUHR
DBE Compliance
Marisa has eight years of project coordination and contract administration experience in the aviation engineering industry. Her position as a Project Coordinator within an engineering team means she has experienced the full spectrum of project administration: from scoping and contract administration, to construction documents and bidding assistance. She has worked with various airports throughout the United States, including the Lake Tahoe Airport. Marisa is responsible for supporting Jviation’s airport clients in the following areas:

Project Experience
DBE Reporting
Lake Tahoe Airport | South Lake Tahoe, CA
Project Coordinator
DBE Reporting
Elko Regional Airport | Elko, NV
Project Coordinator
BS, Business Administration
Project Documentation
Subcontract coordination and compliance
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Tracking and Reporting Invoice Report Preparation
Retention Tracking and Assistance
Project Scheduling Support
38 C-103-2022 240

EXHIBIT B

BILLING RATE SCHEDULE OF
Billing Rate Schedule will be adjusted annually based on CPI C-103-2022 241

2.9877
First Name Last Name Organization
Labor
Category
2022 LS
Billing Rates
John Ingram Corporate Principal 295. 00
Travis Vallin Corporate Principal 295. 00
Todd Anderson Woolpert Senior Consultant III 285. 00
Barbara Fritsche Planning Senior Consultant III 285. 00 Craig Sparks Denver Senior Consultant III 285. 00
Donna Taylor Planning Senior Consultant III 285. 00
Frederick Busch Planning Senior Consultant II 275. 00
Greg Dyer Woolpert Senior Consultant II 275. 00
Hilary Fletcher Corporate Senior Consultant II 275. 00
Joseph Pestka Missouri Senior Consultant II 275. 00
Bradley Davis Corporate Senior Consultant I 265.00
Jim Miklas Planning Planning Manager 290.00
Kari Campbell Texas Planner Program Director I 290.00
Dave Fulton Texas Planner Program Director I 290. 00
George Davis Planning Planner IV 260.00
Morgan Einspahr Planning Planner III 180.00
Thomas Gwin Planning Planner III 180.00
Mel Leseberg Utah Planner III 180.00
Gregory Sanders Planning Planner III 180.00
Drew Eisenberg Planning Associate Planner I 155.00
Zachary Hazzard Planning Associate Planner I 155.00
Benito Gonzales Denver Senior Project Manager 290.00
Mark Lovato Denver Senior Project Manager 290.00
Jason Virzi Corporate Senior Project Manager 290.00
Kirk Nielsen Utah Engineer Program Director I 290.00
Paul Fiore Denver Project Manager IV 255.00
Matthew Gilbreath Denver Project Manager IV 255.00
Jeffery Hogan Utah Project Manager IV 255.00
Kirt McDaniel Utah Project Manager IV 255.00
Andrew Remstad Denver Project Manager IV 255.00
Tracey Salazar Corporate Project Manager IV 255.00
Donald Smith Denver Project Manager IV 255.00
Jon Weeks Denver Project Manager IV 255.00
Adam Acree Architecture Team Leader III/ Project Manager III 230.00 Jesse Erickson Denver Project Manager III 230.00
Derek Johnson Denver Project Manager III 230.00
Alexander Nodich Denver Project Manager III 230.00
Kevin Scherr Missouri Project Manager III 230.00
Joel Wiechmann Denver Project Manager III 230.00
Jonathan Noble California Project Manager II-CA 230.00
Kevin Costello Architecture Project Manager II 210.00
Seth Kurtz Denver Project Manager I 180.00
Timothy Rhoades Denver Engineer Phase Manager IV 210.00 Marc Cocanougher Planning Planner Phase Manager IV 210.00 Trent Holder Planning Planner Phase Manager IV 210.00
Amanda Gross California Engineer Phase Manager I 155.00 Matthew Gillespie Utah Engineer Phase Manager I 155. 00 Cody Hunt Utah Engineer Phase Manager I 155. 00
Jeremy Packer Denver Engineer Phase Manager I 155.00
Laura Riegel Missouri Engineer Phase Manager I 155.00
UPDATED: 4/26/22
2022 Billing Rates
3C- 103-20221 of 242

2.9877
First Name Last Name Organization
Labor
Category
2022 LS
Billing Rates
UPDATED: 4/26/22
2022 Billing Rates
Jennifer Newpower Corporate Ops Manager III 280. 00
Krista Sabec Corporate Ops Manager III 280. 00
Wade Hansen Corporate Ops Manager II 210. 00
Zachary Ambariantz Denver Electrical Phase Manager IV 260. 00 Eric Mitsch Denver Associate Electrical Engineer I 140. 00 Christopher Giessing Corporate Quality Control Manager 255. 00 Dane Hurst Utah Engineer III 175. 00
Wade Cato Denver Designer II 170. 00
David Conway Denver Designer II 170. 00
Scott Henderson Denver Designer II 170. 00
James Morehead Denver Designer II 170. 00
Amy Teigen Planning Designer II 170. 00
Collin Petri Denver Associate Engineer II 155. 00
Stormy Howard Utah Associate Engineer I 130. 00
Fu Ren Zhang Durandal Missouri Associate Engineer I 130. 00 Tony Ori Denver Construction Manager IV 220. 00
Michael Quinn Denver Construction Manager IV 220. 00
Anthony Brusseau Denver Construction Manager III 195. 00 Dale Mitchell Missouri Construction Manager III 195. 00 Todd Birk Denver Construction Manager III 195. 00
Stuart Schiff Denver Construction Manager III 195. 00
Isaac De la Cruz Missouri Construction Manager II 170. 00 Travis Dent Missouri Construction Manager II 170. 00
Robert Hall Utah Construction Manager II 170. 00
Robert Kleinhen Missouri Construction Manager II 170. 00 Carder Ullom Denver Construction Manager II 170. 00
Justin DeBerry Denver Construction Manager I 140. 00
Joseph Fountaine Utah Construction Manager I 140. 00
Whit Hyde Utah Construction Manager I 140. 00
John Long Utah Construction Manager I 140. 00
Sean Smith Denver Construction Manager I 140. 00
Patrick Ver California Construction Manager I 140. 00
Jason Wehmeyer Missouri Construction Manager I 140. 00
Stephen Boyle Architecture Architect II 190. 00
Todd Allen Architecture Architectural Designer II 170. 00 Jenay Catanach Architecture Architectural Designer I 130. 00 Jordan Futch Architecture Architectural Designer I 130. 00 Ryanne Simpson Architecture Architectural Designer I 130. 00 Aaron Apodaca Denver CADD Tech III 140. 00
Robert Bell Denver CADD Tech III 140. 00
Fernando Valenciano Denver CADD Tech III 140. 00
Lynn Bateman Utah CADD Tech II 120. 00
Tayla Brusseau Denver CADD Tech I 105. 00
Kaitlyn Mayer Corporate Proposal Coordinator I 120. 00
Elliott Rosales Corporate Technical Writer I 120.00
Taylor Belt Corporate Graphic Artist I 105.00
Joseph Gonzales Corporate Graphic Artist I 105. 00
Sherilyn Bennion Utah Project Coordinator II 135.00
Marisa Fluhr Corporate Project Coordinator II 135.00
3C- 103-20222 of 243

2.9877
First Name Last Name Organization
Labor
Category
2022 LS
Billing Rates
UPDATED: 4/26/22
2022 Billing Rates
Vicki Elrod Denver Project Coordinator I 115. 00
Teresa Hall Missouri Project Coordinator I 115. 00
Rachel Leigh Denver Project Coordinator I 115. 00
Brooke Moffitt Missouri Project Coordinator I 115. 00
Emily Yea Denver Project Coordinator I 115. 00
Nancy Van Cleave Corporate Billing Analyst Team Lead II 140. 00 Bryce Matteson Planning Support III 120. 00
Kevin Patton Corporate Support III 120. 00
Gabrielle Bohan Corporate Support II 105. 00
Mary Pat Cross Corporate Support II 105. 00
Jennifer Jurk Corporate Support II 105. 00
Beverly McCarrell Utah Support II 105. 00
Amber Eagle Denver Support I 95. 00
Cooper Barnhart Denver Intern 66. 00
Sadie Schenk Utah Intern 66. 00
Joseph Setter Architecture Intern 66. 00
Woolpert Survey Manager 235. 00
Woolpert Survey Phase Manager 135. 00
Woolpert Survey Party Chief 120. 00
Woolpert Land Surveyor ( PLS) 175. 00
Woolpert GIS Technican III 135. 00
Woolpert GIS Technican II 105. 00
Woolpert UAS Pilot 105. 00
3C- 103-20223 of 244

EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “ Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Travis Vallin, Project Director
By:________________________________________
C-103-2022
Travis Vallin ( Jul 12, 2022 07:12 MDT)
Travis Vallin
245

EXHIBIT D

TRADE RESTRICTION CERTIFICATION
Trade Restriction Certification. By submission of an offer, the Offeror certifies that with respect to this solicitation and any resultant contract, the Offeror:

1. is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens of a foreign country included in the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR);

2. has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this project with a person that is a citizen or national of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the USTR; and

3. has not entered into any subcontract for any product to be used on the Federal project that is produced in a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR.

This certification concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States of America and the making of a false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may render the maker subject to prosecution under Title 18 USC Section 1001.

The Offeror/ Consultant must provide immediate written notice to the Owner if the Offeror/ Consultant learns that its certification or that of a Sub-Consultant was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The Consultant must require Sub-Consultant provide immediate written notice to the Consultant if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

Unless the restrictions of this clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in accordance with 49 CFR 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to an Offeror or Sub-Consultant:
a. who is owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR or,
b. whose Sub-Consultant are owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country on such USTR list or, c. who incorporates in the public works project any product of a foreign country on such USTR list.

C-103-2022 246
Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this provision. The knowledge and information of a Consultant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

The Offeror agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification without modification in all lower tier subcontracts. The Consultant may rely on the certification of a prospective SubConsultant that it is not a firm from a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by USTR, unless the Offeror has knowledge that the certification is erroneous.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making an award. If it is later determined that the Consultant or Sub-Consultant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may direct through the Owner cancellation of the contract or subcontract for default at no cost to the Owner or the FAA.

Consultant:

Travis Vallin, Project Director
By:________________________________________
C-103-2022
Travis Vallin ( Jul 12, 2022 07:12 MDT)
Travis Vallin
247

EXHIBIT E

TAX DELINQUENCY AND FELONY CONVICTION CERTIFICATION
The applicant must complete the following two certification statements. The applicant must indicate its current status as it relates to tax delinquency and felony conviction by inserting a checkmark () in the space following the applicable response. The applicant agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification in all lower tier subcontracts.

Certifications (Check one)
The applicant represents that it is is not a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

The applicant represents that it is is not is not a corporation that was convicted of a criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

Note:

If an applicant responds in the affirmative to either of the above representations, the applicant is ineligible to receive an award unless the sponsor has received notification from the agency suspension and debarment official (SDO) that the SDO has considered suspension or debarment and determined that further action is not required to protect the Government’ s interests. The applicant therefore must provide information to the owner about its tax liability or conviction to the Owner, who will then notify the FAA Airports District Office, which will then notify the agency’ s SDO to facilitate completion of the required considerations before award decisions are made.

Term Definitions
Felony conviction: Felony conviction means a conviction within the preceding twenty-four (24) months of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law and includes conviction of an offense defined in a section of the U.S. code that specifically classifies the offense as a felony and conviction of an offense that is classified as a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 3559.

Tax Delinquency: A tax delinquency is any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

Consultant:

Travis Vallin, Project Director
By:________________________________________
C-103-2022
Travis Vallin ( Jul 12, 2022 07:12 MDT)
Travis Vallin
4 4
248

EXHIBIT F

CERTIFICATION OF OFFERER / BIDDER REGARDING DEBARMENT
By submitting a bid/ proposal under this solicitation, the bidder or offeror certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred or suspended by any Federal department or agency from participation in this transaction.

Consultant:

Travis Vallin, Project Director
By:________________________________________
C-2022C- 103- 103-2022
Travis Vallin ( Jul 12, 2022 07:12 MDT)
Travis Vallin
249
ANY PROPRIETOR/ PARTNER/ EXECUTIVEOFFICER/ MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR

LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER

CONTACT
NAME:

FAXPHONE
A/C, No, Ext): A/C, No):(
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER EXPTYPEPOLICY EFF POLICYOF INSURANCE MM/DD/ LIMITS( YYYY) ( MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES ( ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
RENTEDCLAIMS- MADE DAMAGE TO OCCUR $ PREMISES ( Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO- POLICY AGGJECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/ OP
OTHER:$
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(
Ea accident)
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY ( Per person) $

OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY ( Per accident) $
HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident)

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS- MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $
PER OTHSTATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY INSURER( S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A
Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS PERIODINDICATED. IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY

NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER( S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy( ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement( s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
ACORD 25 ( 2016/ 03) 1988- 2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE ( MM/DD/YYYY)
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
5/24/2022
703) 827-2277 ( 703) 827-2279
25666
Jviation, a Woolpert Company
720 South Colorado Blvd, Suite 1200- S
Glendale, CO 80246
25623
25674
19445
20443
A 1,000, 000
P6309P881661 3/1/2022 3/1/2023 1,000, 000
15, 000
1,000, 000
2,000, 000
2,000, 000
000B1,000,
8109P881648 3/1/2022 3/1/2023
000C10, 000,
CUP- 1T790932- 22- NF 3/1/2022 3/1/2023 10, 000, 000
10,000
D
11326672 3/1/2022 3/1/2023 1,000, 000
N
1,000, 000
1,000, 000
E Professional Liab. AEH288355072 3/1/2022 Per Claim/ Aggregate 5,000, 000 RE: Airport Master Professional Services Agreeement
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are included as additional insured with respect to General Liability and Automobile Liability when required by written contract. General Liability includes Additional Insured coverage for On-Going & Completed Operations as required by written contract. General Liability and Automobile Liability are primary and non-contributory over any existing insurance and limited to liability arising out of the operations of the named insured and when required by written contract. General Liability, Automobile Liability, Umbrella Liability and Workers Compensation policies include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the additional insureds where permissible by state law and when required by SEE ATTACHED ACORD 101
City of South Lake Tahoe
CIty Attorney' s Office
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
WOOLINC- 01 KSUTTON
Ames & Gough
8300 Greensboro Drive
Suite 980
McLean, VA 22102
admin@amesgough. com
Travelers Indemnity Co. of America A++, XV
Phoenix Insurance Company A++, XV
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
National Union Fire Insurance Company
Continental Casualty Company (CNA) A, XV
X
3/1/2023
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C-103-2022 250
FORM NUMBER:

EFFECTIVE DATE:

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

ADDITIONAL REMARKS

ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE
FORM TITLE:

Page of

THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, ACORD 101 ( 2008/ 01)
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID:

LOC #:

AGENCY NAMED INSURED

POLICY NUMBER

CARRIER NAIC CODE
2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

Ames & Gough
WOOLINC- 01
SEE PAGE 1
1 SEE PAGE 1
ACORD 25 Certificate of Liability Insurance
1 SEE P 1
Jviation, a Woolpert Company
720 South Colorado Blvd, Suite 1200- S
Glendale, CO 80246
SEE PAGE 1

KSUTTON
1 Description of Operations/Locations/Vehicles:
written contract. 30-day Notice of Cancellation will be issued for the General Liability, Automobile Liability, Umbrella Liability, Workers Compensation and Professional Liability policies in accordance with policy terms and conditions.

C-103-2022 251
ANY PROPRIETOR/ PARTNER/ EXECUTIVEOFFICER/ MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR

LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER

CONTACT
NAME:

FAXPHONE
A/C, No, Ext): A/C, No):(
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER EXPTYPEPOLICY EFF POLICYOF INSURANCE MM/DD/ LIMITS( YYYY) ( MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES ( ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
RENTEDCLAIMS- MADE DAMAGE TO OCCUR $ PREMISES ( Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO- POLICY AGGJECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/ OP
OTHER:$
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(
Ea accident)
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY ( Per person) $

OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY ( Per accident) $
HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident)

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS- MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $
PER OTHSTATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY INSURER( S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A
Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS PERIODINDICATED. IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY

NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER( S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy( ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement( s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
ACORD 25 ( 2016/ 03) 1988- 2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE ( MM/DD/YYYY)
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
5/24/2022
703) 827-2277 ( 703) 827-2279
25666
Jviation, a Woolpert Company
720 South Colorado Blvd, Suite 1200- S
Glendale, CO 80246
25623
25674
19445
20443
A 1,000, 000
P6309P881661 3/1/2022 3/1/2023 1,000, 000
15, 000
1,000, 000
2,000, 000
2,000, 000
000B1,000,
8109P881648 3/1/2022 3/1/2023
000C10, 000,
CUP- 1T790932- 22- NF 3/1/2022 3/1/2023 10, 000, 000
10,000
D
11326672 3/1/2022 3/1/2023 1,000, 000
N
1,000, 000
1,000, 000
E Professional Liab. AEH288355072 3/1/2022 Per Claim/ Aggregate 5,000, 000 RE: Airport Master Professional Services Agreeement
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are included as additional insured with respect to General Liability and Automobile Liability when required by written contract. General Liability includes Additional Insured coverage for On-Going & Completed Operations as required by written contract. General Liability and Automobile Liability are primary and non-contributory over any existing insurance and limited to liability arising out of the operations of the named insured and when required by written contract. General Liability, Automobile Liability, Umbrella Liability and Workers Compensation policies include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the additional insureds where permissible by state law and when required by SEE ATTACHED ACORD 101
Lake Tahoe Airport
Airport Manager
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
Suite 100
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
WOOLINC- 01 KSUTTON
Ames & Gough
8300 Greensboro Drive
Suite 980
McLean, VA 22102
admin@amesgough. com
Travelers Indemnity Co. of America A++, XV
Phoenix Insurance Company A++, XV
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
National Union Fire Insurance Company
Continental Casualty Company (CNA) A, XV
X
3/1/2023
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C-103-2022 252
FORM NUMBER:

EFFECTIVE DATE:

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

ADDITIONAL REMARKS

ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE
FORM TITLE:

Page of

THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, ACORD 101 ( 2008/ 01)
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID:

LOC #:

AGENCY NAMED INSURED

POLICY NUMBER

CARRIER NAIC CODE
2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

Ames & Gough
WOOLINC- 01
SEE PAGE 1
1 SEE PAGE 1
ACORD 25 Certificate of Liability Insurance
1 SEE P 1
Jviation, a Woolpert Company
720 South Colorado Blvd, Suite 1200- S
Glendale, CO 80246
SEE PAGE 1

KSUTTON
1 Description of Operations/Locations/Vehicles:
written contract. 30-day Notice of Cancellation will be issued for the General Liability, Automobile Liability, Umbrella Liability, Workers Compensation and Professional Liability policies in accordance with policy terms and conditions.

C-103-2022 253
C-103-2022 254
C-103-2022 JVIATION
Final Audit Report 2022- 07-12
Created: 2022- 06-28
By: jo Mcdonough ( jmcdonough@cityofslt. us)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAEhvYBA0Sp6Tb5- CcvHGQFKQ8slKBQYmf C-103-2022 JVIATION" History
Document created by jo Mcdonough ([email protected]) 2022- 06- 28 - 3:19:53 PM GMT- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document emailed to Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2022- 06- 28 - 3:23:25 PM GMT
Email viewed by Sue Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. us) 2022- 06- 28 - 3:44:59 PM GMT- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document e-signed by Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022- 06-28 - 3:45:15 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document emailed to Heather Stroud ([email protected]) for signature 2022- 06- 28 - 3:45:19 PM GMT
Email viewed by Heather Stroud ([email protected])
2022- 06- 28 - 3:57:34 PM GMT- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document e-signed by Heather Stroud ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022- 06-28 - 3:58:55 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2022- 06- 28 - 3:58:58 PM GMT
Email viewed by dmiddlebrook@cityofslt. us
2022- 06- 28 - 7:14:32 PM GMT- IP address: 66.189. 255. 213 Document e-signed by Devin Middlebrook ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022- 06-28 - 7:14:47 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 66.189. 255. 213 Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2022- 06- 28 - 7:14:51 PM GMT
255
Email viewed by travis. vallin@woolpert. com
2022- 06- 29 - 3:21:42 AM GMT- IP address: 104. 28.85.49 Email viewed by [email protected]
2022- 07- 01 - 7:23:33 PM GMT- IP address: 104. 28.85.48 New document URL requested by [email protected] 2022- 07- 12 - 1:10:25 PM GMT- IP address: 199. 87.141. 39 Email viewed by [email protected]
2022- 07- 12 - 1:10:39 PM GMT- IP address: 104. 47.51.126 Document e-signed by Travis Vallin ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022- 07-12 - 1:12:01 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 199. 87.141. 39 Agreement completed.
2022- 07- 12 - 1:12:01 PM GMT
256
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:6
Agenda Item: Amendment to Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for El Dorado Beach Revetment and Improvements Project
Executive Summary: At the June 17, 2025 City Council meeting, Resolution 2025-056 allocated $75,000 to complete design and permitting for temporary repairs of erosion at El Dorado Beach.

Concurrently, a large storm in late June 2025 caused severe erosion and significantly accelerated exposure of the sandbags. To ensure the beach could remain open, emergency permitting actions were engaged in with Lahontan, USACE, and TRPA. During annual budget FY26/27, $150,000 was allocated to the El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements project to begin design efforts this winter to expedite the implementation of a permanent revetment as soon as possible. On January 13, 2026, staff provided an update to City Council on the history and status of El Dorado Beach and received direction on the preferred outcome for the beach in the near and long-term. City Council awarded the first phase of the professional services agreement (contract) with Stantec Consulting Inc. (Stantec). Due to the high variability of work for El Dorado Beach dependent on City Council priorities and conversations with regulatory agencies, the consultant scope of work was separated into five separate tasks. In order to meet the design and permitting deadlines to successfully procure a contractor and implement Phase 2 improvements in 2026, additional funds need to be added to Stantec’s contract for the next phase of design. Amendment 1 and the associated scope of work include Phase B, which will concentrate on obtaining additional data, development of studies and boundary survey to support the overall project, while development planning, design, permitting, and implementation of the Phase 1 and 2 construction efforts in 2026 proceed. Because of the tight schedule, to allow for effective implementation in 2026, this contract amendment needs to occur concurrently with mid-year budget augmentations.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for Phase B services for the El Dorado Beach Revetment and Improvements Project for an additional $332,057.50, for an amended total not-to-exceed amount of $482,028.50 (contingent on approval of funds).

Responsible Staff Member: Brianna Greenlaw, Senior Civil Engineer Reviewed and Approved By: Mohammad (Dr. Q) Qureshi, Director of Public Works Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - PSA Amendment 1.docx
02-C-016-2026 Stantec Consulting Services Inc.pdf
03-Amendment to Stantec Amendment.doc
04-Amendment 1 Scope.pdf
257
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement between Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the El Dorado Beach Revetment and Improvements Project
Location: El Dorado Beach/Lakeview Commons
Responsible Staff Member: Brianna Greenlaw, Senior Civil Engineer Background: In 2018, severe erosion at El Dorado beach resulted in vertical drop offs in excess of four feet and the potential for undermining the structural foundations of the lower seating walls of Lakeview Commons. This occurred after consecutive years when the lake was at the maximum legal limit (6229’) coupled with storms bringing significant wave action to El Dorado Beach. To ensure public safety and structural protection of Lakeview Commons assets, the City installed plastic super sack sandbags with various types of rock as a dynamic revetment, covered with layers of sand.

In late 2024, the sandbags and geotextile fabric began to become exposed on the beach.

Following spring snowmelt in 2025, staff assessed the conditions and began engagement with regulatory agencies to allow for beach replenishment. On June 17, 2025, City Council allocated $75,000 to complete design and permitting for temporary repairs (Resolution 2025-056).

Concurrently, a large storm in late June 2025 caused severe erosion and significantly accelerated exposure of the sandbags. To ensure public safety, protection of Lakeview Commons infrastructure, and preservation of the beach, emergency beach replenishment was completed. A portion of the funds allocated as part of Resolution 2025-056 were utilized for the materials for the emergency beach replenishment. As part of emergency permit closeout, the regulatory agencies agreed to 2027 permanent revetment implementation, committing the City to removal of the sandbags, with temporary permitting until then to allow for minor fixes/beach replenishment.

On January 13, 2026, staff provided an update to City Council on the history and status of El Dorado Beach and received direction that the preferred outcome for the beach is to remove the existing plastic sandbags as soon as possible. Additionally, City Council advised staff that the long-term preferred outcome is to protect Lakeview Commons infrastructure and preserve the beach if possible. City Council also awarded the first phase of the professional services agreement (contract) with Stantec Consulting Inc. (Stantec). Due to the high variability of work for El Dorado Beach dependent on City Council priorities and conversations with regulatory agencies, the consultant scope of work was separated into five separate tasks. Phase 1 primarily includes assessments and surveying that will guide conversations and help develop realistic cost estimates, permitting/environmental document timelines, and schedules. Phases 2-5 include planning, interim and permanent solution design, environmental documents, permitting, and construction support.

Issue and Discussion: After contract initiation, staff and the Stantec team immediately began brainstorming potential solutions, project construction phasing, and engaged with the various 258
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 3
permitting agencies that were anticipated to have authority of the El Dorado Beach Revetment and Improvements Project (Project). Four separate meetings were held with five agencies (United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (Lahontan), Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and California State Lands. Following the individual meetings, the team presented the Project plan to the Shorezone Committee on February 19, 2026 and received consensus and direction on the proposed plan from all agencies previously mentioned.

The Project has been separated into three phases due to design, permitting, and implementation requirements and associated timelines. They are outlined in Table 1. The timelines included are approximate based on initial conversations with the regulatory agencies and are subject to change.

Table 1. El Dorado Beach Revetment and Improvements Project Implementation Phases Phase of
Implementation
Description Approximate Implementation
Timeline
1 Replenish the beach following snow
melt to ensure further degradation to
sandbags does not occur, and to allow
for continued use of the beach.

To begin as soon as permits allow
(late April/early May 2026). Sand
replenishment will occur as needed
throughout summer until Phase 2
implementation.
2 Remove the plastic sandbags, install
sheet piling below bottom step of
Lakeview Commons (will not be
visible), rock, and backfill with sand.

As soon as permits, contractor
procurement, and lake level allow
(likely mid-September – October
2026).
3 Final Permanent Improvements –
Details are to be determined after
conducting studies and engaging in
further conversations with agencies.

Phase 2 improvements will be
incorporated into the Phase 3 design.

To Be Determined
Staff and the Stantec team understand that City Council’s priority is to have the sandbags removed as soon as possible. As staff indicated during the presentation on January 13, 2026, removal of the sandbags (and replacement of a structural protection mechanism for Lakeview Commons) could potentially occur in 2026, but it was likely beach replenishment would need to occur until that was feasible. Phase 2 will be a significant project that will require full design and bidding documents, permits, and formal procurement of a contractor. All regulatory agencies have been cooperative and supportive of the Project; however, several of the agencies cannot allow for “emergency” permitting of Phase 2 because it cannot be authorized per their definition of an emergency - “an urgent situation that poses an unacceptable hazard to life, a significant loss of property, or an immediate, unforeseen, and significant economic hardship”. Following standard permitting procedures, agencies and the team have agreed that removal of the sandbags can still occur in the 2026 construction season (Phase 2), but beach replenishment (Phase 1) will need to occur and will be allowed in order to protect the lake from exposure of the microplastics and maintain public access through the majority of the summer until Phase 2 can be implemented. 259
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 3
The phasing of the planning, designing, and permitting included in Stantec’s contract has been revised from a numbering system (1, 2, 3, etc.) to an alphabetic system (A, B, C, etc.) to reduce confusion, as the construction efforts are proposed to be documented as Phases 1, 2, and 3. In order to meet the design and permitting deadlines to successfully procure a contractor and implement Phase 2 improvements in 2026, additional funds need to be added to Stantec’s contract. Amendment 1 and the associated scope of work (Attachments 3 and 4) include Phase B, which will concentrate on obtaining additional data, development of studies and boundary survey to support the overall project, while development planning, design, permitting, and implementation of the Phase 1 and 2 construction efforts in 2026 proceed. Because of the tight schedule, to allow for effective implementation in 2026, this contract amendment needs to occur concurrently with mid-year budget augmentations.

Staff will return to City Council on May 19, 2026 to provide an update on the Phase 2 design and potentially request additional funds for Phase 2 construction if needed, prior to releasing the project for bidding.

Financial Implications: On June 17, 2025, $75,000 was allocated to the El Dorado Beach Revetment Project (Account #301-60086). $11,183.23 was utilized on the 2025 emergency work in order to cover the exposed sandbags and open the beach up safely for the 4th of July holiday.

This leaves a remainder of $63,816.77 in the account to utilize towards interim beach replenishment measures and engineering design and permitting.

As part of the FY25-26 annual budget, an additional $150,000 was allocated to the El Dorado Beach Revetment Project to begin engineering design and permitting services.

On January 13, 2026, Phase 1 of the consultant contract (since renamed Phase A) was awarded for a not to exceed amount of $149,971. To stay on track to implement both Phase 1 and 2 construction in the 2026 construction season, additional design funds are needed. Phase B Design (services included in Amendment 1 to Stantec’s contract) will require an additional $332,057.50 for an amended total not to exceed amount of $482,028.50. This will allow for complete design, permitting, and construction support from the consultant for the Phase 2 Project.

The funding needed for this amendment will be utilized from the total funds allocated to the Project as part of mid-year budget augmentations approved on March 24, 2026. It is anticipated that the remainder of the funds allocated to the Project as part of the mid-year budget will be used for the Phase 2 Project construction.

Environmental Considerations: This project will require detailed environmental review and permitting from multiple local, regional, state, and federal agencies. Although funding is not yet secured, if federal funding is pursued, joint environmental review under NEPA will be required in addition to CEQA and TRPA.

Policy Implications: Completing engineering designs and permitting will develop solutions that assist with advancing the City Council Strategic Priority, Protect the Natural Environment, by removing the plastic sandbags previously installed in 2018 as an emergency revetment at El Dorado Beach. It also advances the City Council Strategic Priority, Recreation and Equitable Access for All, by facilitating implementation of measures at El Dorado Beach that can continue to provide access for people of all abilities to public spaces and ensuring public connectivity and safety at Lakeview Commons.
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
City of South Lake Tahoe
Amendment No. 1 to El Dorado Beach Revetment and Improvements Project, Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (C-016-2026) The Professional Services Agreement entered into on January 13, 2026, between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”) is hereby amended as set forth below.

The Contract is hereby revised to add the following,

1. Scope of Services. In addition to the Scope of Services specified within the original Professional Services Agreement, dated January 13, 2026, with this first Amendment to the Agreement adds the work described within Exhibit A, Scope of Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to the CONSULTANT, as defined within the original Agreement, is hereby increased with this Amendment No. 1 by the sum of $332,057.50 as described within Exhibit A, Scope of Services attached hereto. In no case shall CONSULTANT compensation for work completed under this Amendment exceed the amount of $149,971.00 plus the additional fee of $332,057.50 for an amended total fee of $482,028.50, without written authorization from the CITY. Payment by the CITY under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the CITY at the time of payment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. to be executed on March 24, 2026.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CONSULTANT
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Stephen Peck, PE
Principal Senior Engineer
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.

Date: ________________ Date: _________________________

Business License # 0080171
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ __________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney Susan Blankenship, City Clerk 308
309
City of South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements
Engineering Design and Permitting Services
City Project No. 30160086
RFP #2025-11-07
Phase B Scope of Work Stantec Consulting Services Inc. March 2026 310
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 2 Introduction
Stantec provides the following scope of work, schedule and estimated costs for the El Dorado Beach Revetment Improvements, Engineering Design and Permitting Services (Project). This scope of work is for the second phase of work provided in January 2026 for the Phase A (previously Phase 1) work associated with the project. The “phasing” of the planning, design, permitting, etc. consultant contract has been revised from a numbering system (1, 2, 3, etc.) to a alphabetic system (A, B, C, etc.) to reduce confusion, as the construction efforts are proposed to be documented as phases 1, 2, and 3).

The Project implementation/construciton is planned as part of a phased approach, with three disctint phases, as follows:
 Phase 1:
o Immediate / early 2026 cleaning of sandbags/covering of sandbags  Phase 2:
o Short-term improvements / late 2026 removal of sandbags and replacement of stabilization and protection measures
 Phase 3:
o Long-term / permanent improvements
Below is our proposed scope of work, along with a proposed Phase B Project Schedule in Appendix A and anticipated Phase B costs in Appendix B.

Scope of Work
Phase B
Phase B will build on the efforts performed in Phase A work currently being performed, coordination with the City and coordination with the regulatory agencies. These efforts will concentrate on obtaining additional data, development of studies and development of a boundary survey to support the overall project and Phase 3 construction needs, while development planning, design, permitting and implementation of the Phase 1 and 2 construction efforts in 2026 proceeds.

Task 1 (Cont.): Project Management, Engagement, & Agency Coordination Project Management efforts will include continuation of Phase A efforts for the duration of Phase B.

Subtask 1A: Project Management and Coordination
Project management and coordination will continue through the duration of Phase B. The scope is in accordance with the Phase A scope of work for this sub-task.

Subtask 1B: Meetings
Monthly Coordination meetings will continue for the duration of Phase B. The intent of the meetings is to review project status, discuss project elements and any other need that needs to be addressed. The meetings can also turn into more detailed meetings, with additional specialists invited to attend from the City or Stantec team, depending on “where” the project is at in the schedule.

In addition, we anticipate the following meetings as part of the Phase B efforts.

Agency Meetings
 City / Regulatory Review Meeting - Assessment Memorandum  City / Regulatory Review Meeting - Phase 1
 City / Regulatory Review Draft Concept Plan - Phase 2 Subtask 1C: Project Schedule
The project schedule will be updated quarterly and additionally be reviewed and discussed by the City project manager and Stantec project manager as part of the monthly coordination/progress meetings.

Subtask 1D: Public Engagement
The project area is in a highly used public space, along the shoreline of Lake Tahoe and visible from Highway 50.

Because of its location, the public, community, and visitors will witness construction. This will make the Project one of the City’s “flagship” projects and something that the public will be engaged in and be curious about. In addition, with the Live at the Lake schedule all summer long, impacts to this event will have to be considered as part of the process to minimize 311
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 3 project impacts. The above-noted impacts require engagement with the community as essential for project success, similar to that of other high-profile projects in the City. Stantec believes that public engagement is a key enhancement to project delivery and will provide community input.

In coordination with the City, the initial public engagement and outreach efforts will focus on informing the local community of the project, why it is occurring, and how it relates to Lakeview Commons and the boat launch facility. For the Phase 1 and Phase 2 implementation efforts, the public engagement will be limited to notification and providing information on the project and short-term efforts that will occur. These efforts are anticipated to include the following elements:
 Establish project page on the City website
 Develop and install a project sign, with QR code/links to website at the beach/Lakeview commons  Develop and issue an article on the project in the Tahoe Daily Tribune Task 1 Deliverables:
 Monthly Invoicing and Reporting (8)
 Agenda and meeting summary for each regulatory meeting (3)  PowerPoint presentation for each regulatory meeting (3)  Quarterly Updates to the Project Schedule (2)
 Information for the City website (from materials developed in association with other tasks)  Project information sign layout/information
 Tahoe Daily Tribune article development – language, figures Task 1 Assumptions:
 Phase 2 duration will be from April through November 2026 (8 months)  Monthly City/Stantec coordination meetings (8); no formal agenda or meeting summary, will be performed via email coordination between City and Stantec Project Managers  All meetings will be virtual
 City will develop and maintain the project website
 City will obtain, build and install project sign
 City will pay all fees associated with article for the Tahoe Daily Tribune Task 2 (Cont.): Site Analysis and Data Collection
Additional studies to those conducted in Phase A will be undertaken. The environmental review and assessment will be completed during the spring/early summer to provide for seasonal related field efforts. The shorezone assessment requires that all the other studies are completed prior to initializing this final study.

Subtask 2B (Cont.): Geotechnical
Based on initial coordination with the regulatory agencies and the potential phase 2 and phase 3 construction efforts, obtaining additional geotechnical data below the high-water mark of Lake Tahoe, within the Shorezone area is necessary.

Stantec will obtain subsurface soil data at a depth deeper than that obtained by hand auguring (proposed in Phase A), along with soil borings to determine soil materials, presence/non-presence of bedrock and depth of lacustrine layers in the area. Regulatory authorization is expected to be via USACE’s Nationwide Permit 6, Survey Activities (NWP 6, nonnotifying), and associated enrollment in the State Water Board’s General Order for NWP 6 requiring submission of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (Lahontan) and follow-up basic post action reporting.

Stantec will retain Reno Tahoe Geo Associates (RTGA) to perform geotechnical assessments, soil borings, analysis, field exploration and reporting. RTGA proposes to perform a geotechnical investigation to support the design and construction of the project. The geotechnical site investigations will focus on specific elements of the Project area and improvements, including the following:
 Construction sheet pile protection on the lakeside of Lakeview Commons  Potential construction of facilities within the lake shorezone below ordinary high-water mark  Potential of a pier, breakwater or other significant structure within the Lake shorezone below ordinary high-water mark
312
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 4 RTGA, Stantec and the City will coordinate on the proposed locations for investigation and boreholes. The boreholes will not be located in an area where water is present, they will all be located in “dry” beach areas. This will be performed prior to the site visits, as the first order of work for this subtask.

Prior to the performance of the geotechnical field investigation (excavation of test pits/borings), the site is required to be marked for Underground Service Alert (USA). On this initial visit, RTGA will perform general site reconnaissance, place stakes for their proposed exploration locations, and mark the site for USA utility location. USA will be contacted following site marking to engage utility location services.

During a subsequent visit, the site will be explored using a truck-mounted drill rig to advance four (4) boreholes to a depth of 30 feet or refusal, whichever occurs first. Boreholes will be logged by RTGA personnel in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Bulk and grab samples will be collected in the field, sealed to minimize moisture loss, and transported to the laboratory for testing. Boreholes will be backfilled with drill cuttings.

If visually or olfactorily suspicious subsurface materials are encountered during the exploration, work will be immediately suspended. RTGA will notify the client as soon as practicable, and a mutual decision will be made regarding whether to continue, modify, or terminate the remainder of the exploration program and whether an environmental assessment is warranted. Any costs associated with suspected hazardous materials will be billed on a time-and-expense basis and are not included in the estimated fee for the geotechnical investigation.

Laboratory testing will be performed on the samples acquired as part of the exploration effort. The purpose of the laboratory testing is to evaluate the physical and engineering properties of the soil samples collected in the field. We anticipate the laboratory testing program will consist of:
 Gradation and Plasticity;
 Moisture Content;
 Atterberg Limits;
 R-Value;
 Consolidation; and
 Soluble Sulfate, Soluble Chloride, Resistivity, and pH for assessing reactivity of soil to metal and concrete Based on the results of our field exploration and laboratory testing, we will provide our opinions and recommendations in a geotechnical report regarding the following:
 A brief description of the general seismicity, seismic design class, and potential geologic hazards;  General soil and groundwater observations at the project site with an emphasis on how the conditions are expected to affect the proposed construction;
 Recommendations for earthwork construction, including site preparation recommendations, excavation conditions, a discussion of reuse of existing near surface soils as engineered or non-engineered fill, and a discussion of remedial earthwork recommendations, if warranted;  Recommendations for temporary excavations and trench backfill;  Recent International Building Code (IBC) Site Class for use in structural design;  Seismic design parameters;
 Recommendations for conventional shallow spread foundation design including soil bearing values, minimum footing depth, resistance to lateral loads, and estimated settlements;  Lateral earth pressures and other soil parameters;
 General stability and erodibility of the road embankment materials;  Recommendations for soil corrosion potential; and
 Recommendations for a suitable asphalt pavement section, including requirements for separation or overexcavation.

We will present our opinions and recommendations in a written report complete with logs of the test pits and laboratory testing results.

Subtask 2E: Environmental Review and Field Assessment
As part of our initial assessment, an understanding and knowledge of the existing environmental conditions in and around the project site is essential as it will provide the basis of initial discussions with the regulatory agencies. Since no work has occurred at the project site in over five years (2018 was the last known activity other than the 2025 sand replenishment emergency work) we are assuming that some amount of aquatic, terrestrial, botanical, sensitive species, noxious weeds, 313
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 5 tribal and cultural assessments will be required. The previous efforts associated with Lakeview Commons and 2018 emergency repair will be reviewed and used. However, due to their age, most agencies will require updated database searches and field assessments. Prior to any fieldwork commencing, Stantec will collaborate with the City Planning Department and regulatory agencies to ensure that scope of the data collection effort is matched to the need (avoiding the collection of unnecessary information).

Information collected will be presented in memorandums and reports designed to support the environmental compliance documentation and project permit applications for the project.

Subtask 2F: Shoreline Assessment
Through a combination of the assessments performed under Subtasks 2A through 2D, along with the surveying, bathymetry and basemapping performed in Task 3, the Stantec team will have a clear understanding of the project area, near shore conditions and potential environmental constraints within and around the project area. This will provide the necessary information to provide mapping of the shoreline conditions, littoral drift, current and potential future erosion potential, existing infrastructure, property ownership, and environmentally sensitive areas/elements.

Stantec will develop a technical memorandum summarizing the overall project area and shoreline conditions, including potential opportunities along with known constraints. This will be supported by mapping and GIS figures highlighting and notating the critical areas, necessary avoidance areas, and problematic areas within and around the project site. This information will be used to support the alternatives development, environmental compliance, permitting and design. This information along with beach dynamic graphics will be prepared for use with stakeholders and in public engagement.

Task 2 Deliverables:
 Environmental Assessment Technical Memorandum (City Draft, Agency Draft and Final).  Shoreline Assessment Technical Memorandum (City Draft, Agency Draft and Final).  Permit applications (as needed) and associated follow-up reporting  Draft and Final Geotechnical Report
Task 2 Assumptions:
 All deliverables will be electronic in PDF format.
 Each deliverable will be provided in Draft (for City review) and Final form.

Task 3 (Cont.): Site Survey and Basemap Development
The Phase A surveying efforts included the collection of planimetric and topographic data within the Project area. It was assumed in Phase A scoping that a project boundary/parcel boundary map would be available for use based on previous project efforts within the project area (Lakeview Commons). Based on City review of existing files there was no parcel mapping/boundary survey available in AutoCAD and no Record-of-Survey was available for use for the Project.

Therefore, as part of the project development and construction drawings, a boundary survey and boundary mapping will need to be developed in association with the Project.

Sub-task 3D: Boundary Survey
REY Engineers has reviewed existing available data, including the existing Caltrans Right-of-Way mapping in the vicinity of the Project area and based on this available information will develop a record boundary for the Project area. The boundary will be established on the same datum/projection as the field and bathymetric data acquired in the Phase A efforts for the project.

Task 3 Deliverables:
 Boundary Map for the Project Area
Task 3 Assumptions:
 All deliverables will be electronic in PDF format
 Boundary mapping will be developed from only “record” linework Task 4: Phase 1 Implementation
It is anticipated that the long-term solutions (Phase 3 implementation) will take time to develop, get concurrence on, obtain environmental compliance, design, and obtain permitting. In 2026 the City will implement a phased approach to 314
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 6 implement short-term measures in two phases. Phase 1 will be similar to previous measures performed by the City with the “cleaning” of the sandbags (removal of loose plastic materials) and replenishment of beach sand over the temporary revetment measures (plastic sandbags), similar to what was done in 2025. These efforts are anticipated to be completed by City crews, and no public bidding will be required.

Subtask 4A: Planning and Design
It is anticipated that the planning and design associated with the Phase 1 implementation efforts will be minor in nature.

Stantec will provide support to the City Public Works Department in the development of details, figures and calculations to support the permitting requirements. The figures and documentation for the agencies/permits will include information on the materials to be used (assumed imported sand only). No formal design plans, specifications or estimates will be developed, as the construction will be performed by City Maintenance Crews, without public bidding.

Subtask 4B: Environmental and Permitting
Based on early consultation with regulatory agencies – we anticipate authorization for Phase 1 via a USACE Nationwide Permit 13 (NWP 13, non-notifying) and via an individual Clean Water Action Section 401 Water Quality Certification (401 WQC) from Lahontan. This will require an application to Lahontan for an individual 401 WQC. Given the scope of the action (sand replenishment installed by the City), the basic figures and information developed in 4A are anticipated to be sufficient to complete permitting application(s). Consistent with the CEQA exemption finding for the 2025 replenishment, this scope assumes the City will also find this action exempt from CEQA. TRPA noticing requirements are assumed to be via their Expedited Permit Review Application process and require nominal paperwork and follow-up reporting.

This task will be for assisting the City through the permitting efforts (including development of permitting applications), coordination with agencies and responding to agency and permitting needs and requests to obtain the necessary approvals to implement and construct Phase 1 in the spring and/or early summer of 2026. Basic post-construction monitoring and reporting is also included with this task consistent with anticipated permitting requirements.

Subtask 4C: Construction Support
Stantec will provide as-directed construction support to the City during the construction efforts associated with Phase 1.

Task 4 Deliverables:
 Figures, details and calculations as required by Permitting Agencies  Permitting applications (including a 401 WQC application to Lahontan)  Support with post-construction monitoring and reporting for permitting agencies (as needed).

Task 4Assumptions:
 All deliverables will be electronic in PDF format
 All efforts associated with this task are on a time and materials basis, hours/costs in appendix B are assumptions on the level of effort anticipated.

Task 5: Phase 2 Implementation
Simultaneously with the planning and implementation of the Phase 1 efforts, Stantec will commence and work on the planning, design, and permitting of the Phase 2 implementation efforts. Based on the necessity to obtain different permits and perform more detailed design, along with the necessity to publicly bid the phase 2 construction efforts, combining the phase 1 and phase 2 efforts for implementation in spring/early summer of 2026 is highly unlikely, and why they have been broken into two separate phases and efforts. The intent of the Phase 2 work is to primarily remove the existing sandbags and develop a plan that will stabilize the beach area beyond the beach replenishment performed previously and provide a more durable solution, that will withstand several years of use/protection allowing portions of the improvements to be used as part of the long-term/Phase 3 solution. As part of the Phase 2 efforts the conceptual level of design will be completed and confirmed with the City, agencies, and Shoreline Review Committee. This coordination and collaboration will support a streamlined environmental and permitting process to accelerate environmental and permitting effort.

Subtask 5A: Concept Plan
Based on coordination with the agencies, City and Shorezone Review Committee in Phase A efforts, Stantec will develop a conceptual site plan for the Phase 2 implementation. The basis of Phase 2 work will be the removal of the existing sandbags and providing protective measures for the stabilization of the Lakeview Commons infrastructure including restoration of El Dorado Beach for continuous use. Additionally, the Phase 2 implementation will provide for continual beach use/access and provide for the continual use/performance of Live at Lakeview and the concessionaires at Lakeview Commons.
315
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 7 The Concept plan will include an overall site plan with associated details and material information on one plan sheet for ease of review and discussion with the regulatory agencies. Stantec will provide a draft to the City, and an updated draft for agency review. No final concept plan will be developed. Comments from the agency review will be used to develop the final design and construction documents.

Subtask 5B: Design and Construction Documents
Upon agreement on the concept plan for the Phase 2 implementation Stantec will develop the design and draft construction documents (plans, specifications and bid list) of the work to be publicly bid. It is anticipated that the cost of the improvements will exceed what is allowed to be performed by City crews and that of an informal bid process, requiring a free and open traditional public works bid. The design will not be a traditional civil/public work full 30%, 60%, 90% and final design process, as the timeline to implement the work in the fall of 2026 does not allow for this level of effort and review. Additionally, with the compressed timeline it is anticipated that the design reach an approximate 60% to 75% traditional design level, which will allow for “field fitting” and “field direction” as necessary based on field conditions during construction. The design and construction plan set will include the following:
 Cover Sheet
 Notes Sheet
 Index Sheet / Survey Control
 Temporary BMPs / Erosion Control / Dewatering
 Staging/Storage/Access
 Demolition Plan
 Site Plan
 Grading Plan
 Cross-sections
 Temporary BMP / Erosion Control / Dewatering Details
 construction details
The construction document package will additionally include technical specifications for materials, cut and fill calculations for permitting applications, and construction efforts (contractual and front-end specifications will be developed/provided by the City for review by Stantec) and an estimate/bid list to support the plans.

Stantec will develop a draft construction document package for the City review/comment. Upon receipt of comments, the construction document package will be updated and provided to the City for use in bidding the project.

Due to the accelerated nature of the project, permitting and environmental documents will be performed and developed concurrently with the design and construction document development. It is anticipated that permit conditions will not be received until the bid period is underway or closed. Therefore, any required revisions to the construction documents based on environmental or permitting requirements will be performed as part of a bid addendum and/or conformed construction documents prior to award of the project to the construction contractor.

Subtask 5C: Environmental and Permitting
Construction of Phase 2 will require the CEQA and NEPA lead agencies—anticipated to be the City and USACE, respectively—to determine that the project has no potential for significant or adverse environmental effects. This determination would allow permit applications to be deemed complete without the need for preparation of an Initial Study (CEQA) or an Environmental Assessment (NEPA). The scope assumes that the environmental review and field assessments completed under Subtask 2E will provide sufficient information to support Categorical Exemption (CEQA) and Categorical Exclusion (NEPA) findings for the project.

Approvals from the following agencies are expected to be required prior to construction of the Phase 2 project:
 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): Authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (anticipated via Nationwide Permit, likely NWP 13 – Bank Stabilization).  Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (Lahontan): Section 401 Water Quality Certification pursuant to the Clean Water Act.
 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA): Shorezone Permit and findings pursuant to the TRPA Code of Ordinances.
 California State Lands Commission (State Lands): Lease, easement, or other authorization for use of state sovereign lands.
316
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 8  California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW): Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 1602.

The Stantec team will develop a complete project description for use in all permitting applications based on 30% design plans, prepare draft permit applications and supporting materials (narratives, figures, and technical attachments) for City review, finalize them, and assist the City in agency coordination and response to questions. We assume the City will submit all permit applications and be the primary point of contact with the regulatory agencies. During the permitting review period, the Stantec team will support the City in response to questions, coordination, meetings, etc. to assist in permit obtainment. Once the permit conditions have been received the conditions will be incorporated in the plans and specifications prior to development of bid documents. The permits, along with all conditions, will be included as appendices to the construction bid documents.

Subtask 5D: Construction Bidding and Construction Support Stantec will provide as-directed construction bidding and construction support to the City during the construction efforts associated with Phase 2.

Task 5 Deliverables:
 Draft Phase 2 Concept Plan (City and Agency)
 Draft Construction Documents for Phase 2
 Final Construction Documents for Phase 2
 Addendum or Conformed Documents for Phase 2
 Project Permit applications for Phase 2
Task 5 Assumptions:
 All deliverables will be electronic in PDF format
 Designs plans will be to an approximate 60% design level for field fit construction  There will only be one iteration of the design/construction documents based on agency permitting requirements.

Any additional comments/revisions required beyond the one iteration will be on a time and materials basis outside the scope of work/change order.
 All efforts associated with the construction bidding and construction support are on a time and materials basis, hours/costs in appendix B are assumptions on the level of effort anticipated.  CEQA and NEPA review indicates no potential for significant/adverse effects to any resources such that CatEx findings are defensible.
 Labor to complete and submit permitting applications is based on a streamlined review pathway. However, if agency coordination or application revisions exceed standard effort (e.g., expanded impact analysis or multiple rounds of comments), additional time may be needed.
 Permitting applications will include conservative estimate of cut and fill numbers based on early design plans.  stages (until those quantities are available).
 All permitting fees will be paid by the City.
 No City permits will be required as this is a City project on City owned/controlled land and no internal City permits will be required nor obtained for construction of the project.  No formal consultation for USFWS is anticipated.
 Less than 1 acre of disturbance and therefore no Construction General Permit/SWPPP required. 317
Scope of Work - Phase B - El Dorado Beach Revetment & Improvements Stantec 9

Appendix A Project Schedule
318
ID Task
Mode
Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Notice to Proceed - Phase A 0 days Mon 1/19/26 Mon 1/19/26 2 Phase B 95 days Mon 1/19/26 Fri 5/29/263 Meetings 20 days Wed 1/21/26 Thu 2/19/26 1FS+3 days4 Project Kickoff Meeting 0 days Wed 1/21/26 Wed 1/21/265 TRPA Meeting 0 days Wed 1/21/26 Wed 1/21/266 Lahontan/USACE Meeting 0 days Wed 1/28/26 Wed 1/28/267 Shorezone Review Committee Meeting 0 days Thu 2/19/26 Thu 2/19/268 Site Analysis and Data Collection 95 days Mon 1/19/26 Fri 5/29/269 Existing Data / Materials - Data Gaps Memorandum
45 days Mon 1/19/26 Fri 3/20/26
10 Request for Existing Data / Materials 5 days Mon 1/19/26 Fri 1/23/26 111 City provide Existing Data / Materials 5 days Mon 1/26/26 Fri 1/30/26 1012 Review Existing Data / Materials 10 days Mon 2/2/26 Fri 2/13/26 1113 Develop Data Gaps Memorandum 10 days Mon 2/16/26 Fri 2/27/26 1214 City Review - Data Gaps Memorandum 10 days Mon 3/2/26 Fri 3/13/26 1315 Final Data Gaps Memorandum 5 days Mon 3/16/26 Fri 3/20/26 1416 Field Assessments 15 days Thu 2/26/26 Wed 3/18/2617 Geotechnical Field Assessment 5 days Thu 2/26/26 Wed 3/4/26 3FS+5 days18 Geotechnical Laboratory analysis 10 days Thu 3/5/26 Wed 3/18/26 1719 Desktop Assessments / Memorandums 52 days Thu 3/19/26 Fri 5/29/2620 Geotechnical Assessment Technical Memorandum 20 days Thu 3/19/26 Wed 4/15/26 18,1721 Wind / Wave Modeling 15 days Mon 3/23/26 Fri 4/10/26 2522 Wind / Wave Modeling Technical Memorandum 10 days Mon 4/13/26 Fri 4/24/26 2123 Littoral Drift Analysis 15 days Mon 4/27/26 Fri 5/15/26 2224 Littoral Drift Technical Memorandum 10 days Mon 5/18/26 Fri 5/29/26 2325 Site Surveying & Basemapping 30 days Mon 2/9/26 Fri 3/20/2626 Land Surveying 5 days Mon 2/9/26 Fri 2/13/26 1FS+15 days27 Bathymetric Surveying 5 days Mon 2/16/26 Fri 2/20/26 2628 Basemap Development 20 days Mon 2/23/26 Fri 3/20/26 26,2729 Notice to Proceed - Phase B 0 days Tue 3/10/26 Tue 3/10/2630 Phase B 166 days Tue 3/10/26 Tue 10/27/2631 Field Assessments 10 days Tue 3/24/26 Mon 4/6/2632 Environmental Field Assessment 10 days Tue 3/24/26 Mon 4/6/26 29FS+10 days33 Desktop Assessments / Memorandums 20 days Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/4/2634 Environmental Assessment Technical Memorandum 20 days Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/4/26 3235 Shoreline Assessment 20 days Tue 5/5/26 Mon 6/1/2636 Shoreline Assessment Technical Memorandum 10 days Tue 5/5/26 Mon 5/18/26 3337 Stakeholder Review - Assessment Memorandums 10 days Tue 5/19/26 Mon 6/1/26 3638 Stakeholder Coordination Meeting - Assessment Memorandums
0 days Mon 5/25/26 Mon 5/25/26 36FS+5 days
39 Public Engagement - Existing Conditions/public
input
85 days Tue 3/10/26 Mon 7/6/26
40 Establish Project Website on City Website 20 days Tue 3/10/26 Mon 4/6/26 2941 Develop Draft Planning Commission Presentation 10 days Tue 6/2/26 Mon 6/15/26 33,3542 City Review - Draft Planning Commission Presentation
10 days Tue 6/16/26 Mon 6/29/26 41
43 Final Planning Commission Presentation 5 days Tue 6/30/26 Mon 7/6/26 4244 Planning Commission Meeting 0 days Mon 7/6/26 Mon 7/6/26 4345 Phase 1 Improvement Planning 35 days Tue 3/10/26 Mon 4/27/2646 Phase 1 Preliminary Planning 15 days Tue 3/10/26 Mon 3/30/26 3,2947 City / Regulatory Meeting Phase 1 0 days Mon 4/6/26 Mon 4/6/26 46FS+5 days48 Phase 1 final planning 15 days Tue 4/7/26 Mon 4/27/26 4749 Phase 1 Implementation 45 days Mon 5/4/26 Fri 7/3/2650 Permitting 30 days Mon 5/4/26 Fri 6/12/2651 Develop Project Description and Figures 5 days Mon 5/4/26 Fri 5/8/26 45,6252 Develop Draft Permit applications 5 days Mon 5/11/26 Fri 5/15/26 5153 City submission of Permit Applications 0 days Fri 5/15/26 Fri 5/15/26 5254 Agency Review Period - Permitting 10 days Mon 5/18/26 Fri 5/29/26 5355 Receipt of Permit Conditions 0 days Fri 5/29/26 Fri 5/29/26 5456 Finalize Project Description and Figures 5 days Mon 6/1/26 Fri 6/5/26 5557 Obtain Permits 5 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/12/26 5658 Construction (City Crew's) 10 days Fri 6/19/26 Fri 7/3/2659 Start Construction 0 days Fri 6/19/26 Fri 6/19/26 50FS+5 days60 Construction Period 10 days Mon 6/22/26 Fri 7/3/26 5961 End Construction 0 days Fri 7/3/26 Fri 7/3/26 6062 Phase 2 Improvement Planning 30 days Fri 3/20/26 Fri 5/1/2663 City Phase 2 Kickoff/Brainstorming Meeting 0 days Fri 3/20/26 Fri 3/20/26 3,25,2764 Develop Draft Concept Plan - Phase 2 10 days Mon 3/23/26 Fri 4/3/26 6365 City Revie, Draft Concept Plan - Phase 2 5 days Mon 4/6/26 Fri 4/10/26 6466 Update Concept Plan - Phase 2 5 days Mon 4/13/26 Fri 4/17/26 6567 City / Regulatory Review Draft Concept Plan - Phase 2 10 days Mon 4/20/26 Fri 5/1/26 66
68 City / Regulatory Meeting Draft Concept Plan -
Phase 2
0 days Fri 4/24/26 Fri 4/24/26 66FS+5 days
69 Phase 2 Implementation 127 days Mon 5/4/26 Tue 10/27/2670 Design and Permitting 80 days Mon 5/4/26 Fri 8/21/2671 Develop Draft PS&E package for permitting/review 20 days Mon 5/4/26 Fri 5/29/26 6272 City Review Draft PS&E package 5 days Mon 6/1/26 Fri 6/5/26 7173 Final PS&E package for permitting 5 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/12/26 7274 Develop Draft Permit applications and supporting documents
5 days Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/12/26 72
75 City submission of Permit Applications 0 days Fri 6/12/26 Fri 6/12/26 73,7476 Agency Review Period - Permitting 20 days Mon 6/15/26 Fri 7/10/26 7577 Receipt of Permit Conditions 0 days Fri 7/10/26 Fri 7/10/26 7678 Finalize PS&E for Permits 10 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/24/26 7779 Obtain Permits 20 days Mon 7/27/26 Fri 8/21/26 7880 Construction Bidding and Construction 97 days Mon 6/15/26 Tue 10/27/2681 Develop Construction Bid Documents 10 days Mon 6/15/26 Fri 6/26/26 7582 Bid Release 0 days Fri 6/26/26 Fri 6/26/26 8183 Bid Period 15 days Mon 6/29/26 Fri 7/17/26 8284 Receipt of Bids 0 days Fri 7/17/26 Fri 7/17/26 8385 Bid Review 5 days Mon 7/20/26 Fri 7/24/26 8486 Bid Award 0 days Tue 8/25/26 Tue 8/25/26 85FS+20 days,79FS+2 days87 Construction Notice to Proceed 0 days Tue 9/1/26 Tue 9/1/26 86FS+5 days88 Submittals/Review 10 days Wed 9/2/26 Tue 9/15/26 8789 Construction Start 0 days Tue 9/15/26 Tue 9/15/26 8890 Construction Period 30 days Wed 9/16/26 Tue 10/27/26 8991 Construction End 0 days Tue 10/27/26 Tue 10/27/26 90 1/19
1/211/21
1/28
2/19
3/10
5/25
7/6
4/6
5/15
5/29
6/19
7/3
3/20
4/24
6/12
7/10
6/26
7/17
8/25
9/1
9/15
10/2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
TaskSplit
MilestoneSummary
Project SummaryInactive Task
Inactive MilestoneInactive Summary
Manual TaskDuration-only
Manual Summary RollupManual Summary
Start-onlyFinish-only
External TasksExternal Milestone
DeadlineProgress
Manual Progress