Cities Index.
Agenda packet

South Lake Tahoe City Council
March 24, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
March 24, 2026
Body
South Lake Tahoe City Council
Pages
15
Original file
305.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

514
WC 89 06 00 A
Policy Number

ENDORSEMENT
Insured Name Policy Effective Date:
12:01 A.M., Standard Time
Agent Name Agent No.

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

Coverage Parts Affected
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.

All other terms and conditions of this Policy remain unchanged.

The information below is required to be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to the policy effective date.) Endorsement Effective Date , this endorsement forms part of Policy Number Insured Name:

Policy Effective Date:

NCCI Carrier Code:

Endorsement No:

ZAWCI9995401
05- 01- 2023
05/ 01/ 2023
001

TO BE ADJUSTED AT AUDIT
EDGEWOOD PARTNERS INSURANCE CENTER 34911

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
ZAWCI9995401
05- 01- 2023
QUALITY CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC.

CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC.

CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, SOUTH, INC.

QC SOUTHWEST, INC.

SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, INC.

F/ K/ A SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, P. C.

F/ K/ A SUMMIT ELT, INC.

GEOSERVICES, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY EXPLORATION, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY LIVING, LLC

GPR TESTING AND INSPECTION LLC

GSI ENGINEERING LLC

SPEEDIE & ASSOCIATES, LLC

DAN BROWN AND ASSOCIATES, PC

CARMICHAEL ENGINEERING LLC - A UES COMPANY

FAULKNER ENGINEERING SERVICES LLC
GRUBBS, HOSKYN, BARTON & WYATT, INC.

TO: OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
28355

Page 2 ends

515
WC 89 06 00 A
Policy Number

ENDORSEMENT
Insured Name Policy Effective Date:
12:01 A.M., Standard Time
Agent Name Agent No.

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

Coverage Parts Affected
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.

All other terms and conditions of this Policy remain unchanged.

The information below is required to be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to the policy effective date.) Endorsement Effective Date , this endorsement forms part of Policy Number Insured Name:

Policy Effective Date:

NCCI Carrier Code:

Endorsement No:

ZAWCI9995401
05- 01- 2023
05/ 01/ 2023
001

TO BE ADJUSTED AT AUDIT
EDGEWOOD PARTNERS INSURANCE CENTER 34911

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
ZAWCI9995401
05- 01- 2023
OBSIDIAN GROUP ACQUISITIONS, INC.

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, LLC
F/ K/ A UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC.

CENTURION CONSULTANTS HOLDINGS, INC.

CENTURION CONSULTANTS, LLC

ARIES CONSULTANTS, LLC
MCGINLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.

GEOTEK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. DBA UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, LLC

NOVA GEOTECHNICAL AND INSPECTION SERVICES, LLC

NOVA GEOTECHNICAL AND INSPECTION SERVICES - NORTHERN NEVADA LLC

NOVA GEOTECHNICAL AND INSPECTION SERVICES - SO CAL ( A CALIFORNIA

CORPORATION)

CONTOUR ENGINEERING, LLC

IQC SOUTHWEST LLC
RIVER CITY GEOPROFESSIONALS, INC. DBA UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES QUALITY CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC.

CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, INC.

CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND ENGINEERING, SOUTH, INC.

QC SOUTHWEST, INC.
28355

Page 3 ends

516
WC 89 06 00 A
Policy Number

ENDORSEMENT
Insured Name Policy Effective Date:
12:01 A.M., Standard Time
Agent Name Agent No.

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

Coverage Parts Affected
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.

All other terms and conditions of this Policy remain unchanged.

The information below is required to be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to the policy effective date.) Endorsement Effective Date , this endorsement forms part of Policy Number Insured Name:

Policy Effective Date:

NCCI Carrier Code:

Endorsement No:

ZAWCI9995401
05- 01- 2023
05/ 01/ 2023
001

TO BE ADJUSTED AT AUDIT
EDGEWOOD PARTNERS INSURANCE CENTER 34911

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
ZAWCI9995401
05- 01- 2023
SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, INC.

F/ K/ A SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, P. C.

F/ K/ A SUMMIT ELT, INC.

GEOSERVICES, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY EXPLORATION, LLC

GEOTECHNOLOGY LIVING, LLC

GPR TESTING AND INSPECTION LLC

GSI ENGINEERING LLC

SPEEDIE & ASSOCIATES, LLC

DAN BROWN AND ASSOCIATES, LLC

CARMICHAEL ENGINEERING LLC - A UES COMPANY

FAULKNER ENGINEERING SERVICES LLC
GRUBBS, HOSKYN, BARTON & WYATT, INC.

THE FOLLOWING ENTITY NAME( S) HAVE BEEN CHANGED FROM: DAN BROWN AND ASSOCIATES, PC TO: DAN BROWN AND ASSOCIATES, LLC
28355

Page 4 ends

517
Endorsement Number:

Policy Number: ZACAT9289701
Named Insured: OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
This endorsement is effective on the inception date of this Policy unless otherwise stated herein:

Endorsement Effective Date: 5/ 1/ 2023
00 CA0070 00 10 13 Page 1 of 1
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED – DESIGNATED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM

BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM

MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM

SCHEDULE
Name of Person(s) or Organization( s):

BY WRITTEN CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT
With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by the endorsement.

Under Covered Autos Liability Coverage, the Who is An Insured provision is amended to include as an “insured” the person(s) or organization( s) named in the Schedule above, but only with respect to their legal liability for your acts or omissions or acts or omissions of any person for whom Covered Auto Liability Coverage is afforded under this policy.

All other terms and conditions of this Policy remain unchanged. 518

COMMERCIAL AUTO
CA 04 49 11 16
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CA 04 49 11 16 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2016 Page 1 of 1 PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY –

OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM

BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM

MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM
With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by the endorsement.

A. The following is added to the Other Insurance
Condition in the Business Auto Coverage Form
and the Other Insurance – Primary And Excess
Insurance Provisions in the Motor Carrier
Coverage Form and supersedes any provision to
the contrary:

This Coverage Form's Covered Autos Liability
Coverage is primary to and will not seek
contribution from any other insurance available to
an "insured" under your policy provided that:

1. Such "insured" is a Named Insured under such
other insurance; and

2. You have agreed in writing in a contract or
agreement that this insurance would be
primary and would not seek contribution from
any other insurance available to such
insured".

B. The following is added to the Other Insurance
Condition in the Auto Dealers Coverage Form and
supersedes any provision to the contrary:

This Coverage Form's Covered Autos Liability
Coverage and General Liability Coverages are
primary to and will not seek contribution from any
other insurance available to an " insured" under
your policy provided that:

1. Such "insured" is a Named Insured under such
other insurance; and

2. You have agreed in writing in a contract or
agreement that this insurance would be
primary and would not seek contribution from
any other insurance available to such
insured".

POLICY NUMBER: ZACAT9289701
519
POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL AUTO
CA 04 44 10 13
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CA 04 44 10 13 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2011 Page 1 of 1

WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY

AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION)
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM

BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM

MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM
With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by the endorsement.

This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below.

Named Insured:

Endorsement Effective Date:

SCHEDULE
Name( s) Of Person( s) Or Organization( s):

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

The Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others
To Us condition does not apply to the person( s) or
organization( s) shown in the Schedule, but only to
the extent that subrogation is waived prior to the
accident’’ or the ‘‘ loss’’ under a contract with that
person or organization.

ZACAT9289701

ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHERE WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER

IS PERMITTED BY LAW AND IS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT PROVIDED SUCH CONTRACT WAS EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE LOSS.

OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
05/ 01/ 2023
520
CG 20 10 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 2 POLICY NUMBER: ZAGLB9255701 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED – OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS – SCHEDULED PERSON OR

ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization( s) Location(s) Of Covered Operations

WHERE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN ALL PROJECTS

CONTRACT, PRIOR TO KNOWN
LOSS.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
521

Page 2 of 2 ends

A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization( s) shown in the Schedule, but only with
respect to liability for " bodily injury", " property
damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused,
in whole or in part, by:

1. Your acts or omissions; or

2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your
behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations for
the additional insured(s) at the location(s)
designated above.

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted by
law; and

2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the
insurance afforded to such additional insured
will not be broader than that which you are
required by the contract or agreement to
provide for such additional insured.

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following additional
exclusions apply:

This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or
property damage" occurring after:

1. All work, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with such
work, on the project ( other than service,
maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or
on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the
location of the covered operations has been
completed; or

2. That portion of " your work" out of which the
injury or damage arises has been put to its
intended use by any person or organization
other than another contractor or subcontractor
engaged in performing operations for a
principal as a part of the same project.

C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following is added to
Section III – Limits Of Insurance:

If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most we
will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the
amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable limits of
insurance;
whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the
applicable limits of insurance.
522
CG 20 37 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 2 POLICY NUMBER: ZAGLB9255701 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 37 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED – OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS – COMPLETED OPERATIONS

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization( s) Location And Description Of Completed Operations

WHERE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN

CONTRACT, PRIOR TO KNOWN
LOSS.

ALL PROJECTS

PERFORMANCE OF OPERATIONS AT

ANY LOCATION ON BEHALF OF SUCH

PERSON(S) OR ORGANIZATION( S),
PRIOR TO LOSS.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
523

Page 2 of 2 ends

A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization( s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for " bodily injury" or
property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by
your work" at the location designated and
described in the Schedule of this endorsement
performed for that additional insured and included
in the "products- completed operations hazard".

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted by
law; and

2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the
insurance afforded to such additional insured
will not be broader than that which you are
required by the contract or agreement to
provide for such additional insured.

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following is added to
Section III – Limits Of Insurance:

If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most we
will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the
amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable limits of
insurance;
whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the
applicable limits of insurance.
524

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 01 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CG 20 01 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1 PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY –

OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
The following is added to the Other Insurance
Condition and supersedes any provision to the
contrary:

Primary And Noncontributory Insurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek
contribution from any other insurance available to
an additional insured under your policy provided
that:
1) The additional insured is a Named Insured
under such other insurance; and
2) You have agreed in writing in a contract or
agreement that this insurance would be
primary and would not seek contribution
from any other insurance available to the
additional insured.

POLICY NUMBER: ZAGLB9255701
525
CG 24 04 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1 POLICY NUMBER: ZAGLB9255701 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 24 04 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY

AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

ELECTRONIC DATA LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE PART DESIGNATED SITES

POLLUTION LIABILITY LIMITED COVERAGE PART DESIGNATED SITES

PRODUCTS/ COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK POLICY DESIGNATED TANKS

SCHEDULE
Name Of Person(s) Or Organization( s):

ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHERE WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER IS

PERMITTED BY LAW AND IS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT PROVIDED SUCH CONTRACT WAS EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE LOSS.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of
Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of
Section IV – Conditions:

We waive any right of recovery against the person(s)
or organization( s) shown in the Schedule above
because of payments we make under this Coverage
Part. Such waiver by us applies only to the extent that the insured has waived its right of recovery against
such person(s) or organization( s) prior to loss. This
endorsement applies only to the person(s) or
organization( s) shown in the Schedule above.

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
526
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.

The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective 05/01/2023 Policy No. ZAWCI9995401 Endorsement No.

Insured OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
OBSIDIAN GROUP ACQUISITIONS, INC.

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, LLC
F/K/A UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC.

CENTURION CONSULTANTS HOLDINGS, INC.

CENTURION CONSULTANTS, LLC

ARIES CONSULTANTS, LLC
MCGINLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.

GEOTEK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. DBA UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, LLC

NOVA GEOTECHNICAL AND INSPECTION SERVICES, LLC

NOVA GEOTECHNICAL AND INSPECTION SERVICES - NORTHERN NEVADA LLC Premium INCL.

Insurance Company ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
Countersigned By
1983 National Council on Compensation Insurance.

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 00 03 13 Ed. 4-84)

WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT
We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the Schedule.

Schedule

ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHERE WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO

RECOVER IS PERMITTED BY LAW AND IS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN

CONTRACT PROVIDED SUCH CONTRACT WAS EXECUTED PRIOR TO DATE OF LOSS.

For policies or exposure in Missouri:

Any person or organization for which the employer has agreed by written contract, executed prior to loss, may execute a waiver of subrogation. However, for purposes of work performed by the employer in Missouri, this waiver of subrogation does not apply to any construction group of classifications as designated by the waiver of right to recover from others (subrogation) rule in our manual. 527
POLICY NUMBER:

DATE OF ISSUE:

ZAWCI9995401
05- 02- 23
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.

The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective Policy No. Endorsement No.

Insured Premium $
Insurance Company
Countersigned By
05- 01- 23 ZAWCI9995401

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
OBSIDIAN GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC INCL.
1998 by the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. All rightsreserved.

From the WCIRB’s California Workers’ Compensation Insurance Forms Manual 1999.

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 04 03 06 Ed. 04-84)

WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT -

CALIFORNIA
We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. ( This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) You must maintain payroll records accurately segregating the remuneration of your employees while engaged in the work described in the Schedule.

The additional premium for this endorsement shall be % of the California workers’ compensation premium otherwise due on such remuneration.

SCHEDULE

PERSON OR ORGANIZATION JOB DESCRIPTION

ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHERE
2 ALL JOBS UNDER CONTRACT

WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER IS

PERMITTED BY LAW AND IS REQUIRED BY

WRITTEN CONTRACT PROVIDED SUCH

CONTRACT WAS EXECUTED PRIOR TO DATE
OF LOSS.
528
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:9
Agenda Item: Amendment to Agreement with BPR for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services and Amendments to Agreements with TRB and Associates and 4Leaf Inc. for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services
Executive Summary: A Request for Proposals was released from September 27, 2023, to October 18, 2023. At its November 21, 2023 meeting, the City Council authorized 3-year Professional Services Agreements with BPR Group, TRB and Associates, and 4Leaf Inc with a not-to-exceed cumulative total for all three firms of $230,000. On October 22, 2024 City Council authorized an amendment to the BPR Group contract to increase the not to exceed total to $700,000. Due to increased construction and VHR inspection activity, staff is recommending amendments to increase the not to exceed contract amounts for BPR Group to $950,000 and $350,000 for TRB and Associates and 4Leaf Inc.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to: (1) execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement with BPR for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services for a new not-to-exceed amount of $950,000; and 2) execute Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with TRB and Associates for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services for a new not-toexceed amount of $350,000; and 3) execute Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with 4Leaf Inc. for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services for a new not-to-exceed amount of $350,000.

Responsible Staff Member: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
02-BPR Amendment 2.docx
03-TRB Amendment 1.docx
04-4Leaf Amendment 1.docx
05-C-270-2024 BPR Consulting Amendment 1.pdf
06-C-257-2023 PSA with TRB and Associates.pdf
07-C-256-2023 PSA with 4Leaf Inc..pdf
01-Staff_Report-PSA_Amendments__1_.docx
529
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: Contract Amendment with BPR for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services and Contract Amendments with TRB and Associates and 4Leaf Inc. for Inspection, Plan Review, and Permit Technician Services (3-year contracts) Location: City-wide
Responsible Staff Member: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Background: The City of South Lake Tahoe Development Services Department experiences significant variation in workload throughout the year outside of the economically driven ebb and flow of general permit activity. The two main contributing factors are weather and the grading season that extends from roughly May 1st to October 15th. The impact of these factors greatly contributes to an oscillation of permit applications, permit issuances, plan reviews, and building inspections between the winter months and the summer months. The use of professional consulting services allows for consistent service delivery in the areas of building permit application intake and issuance, building plan reviews and building inspections.

A Request for Proposals was released from September 27, 2023, to October 18, 2023. At its November 21, 2023 meeting, the City Council authorized 3-year Professional Services Agreements with BPR Group, TRB and Associates, and 4Leaf Inc with a not-to-exceed cumulative total for all three firms of $230,000. At its October 22, 2024 meeting the City Council approved an amendment to the BPR contract to increase the not-to-exceed amount from $230,000 to $700,000.

Issue and Discussion: The City continues to experience a significant amount of largescale construction activity requiring the increased use of the third-party consultants, especially BPR Group that primarily provides on-call consulting services. For example, the speed of the module installation and construction of the Sugar Pine Village Affordable Housing Project requires a full-time inspector on-site. This enhanced inspection service will be necessary throughout the construction of three remaining phases. Additionally, the overall increased construction activity (city-wide) has placed further demand on plan check and inspection services provided throughout the Department Services Department During the development of the Department’s new permit management software during 2024 and 2025, BPR Group provided Permit Technician services to manage counter activity as staff employed their efforts in development of the software system. BPR has also been providing inspection and permit technician services for the VHR program since June 2025. Continued VHR inspection services are anticipated due to the proposed amendments to the VHR ordinance.
530
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 2
BPR Group has and continues to provide plan review and inspections services for large projects such as Sugar Pine Village, Target, the Multi-Generation Recreation and Aquatics Center, the Ice Areana, Zalanta, Heavenly Village, Sierra, Ulta Beauty, 5 Below and a variety of smaller projects of various uses and building types. Through these reviews, BPR has demonstrated proficiency in code knowledge, South Lake Tahoe local design criteria, and TRPA regulations. Contract staffing levels are tied to the overall construction activity and monitored through construction valuation. Recent years have seen an increase in construction activity and valuation, indicating a positive ongoing trend towards increased development and economic activity.

TRB and Associates and 4Leaf Inc. also both provide valuable and necessary specialized plan review services for numerous projects including the City’s new affordable housing project located at 3900 Lake Tahoe Blvd.

Financial Implications: Based on the increased need of the services provided by BPR Group, staff recommends increasing the not to exceed total contract amount of $700,000 as indicated in the amended Professional Services Agreement to $950,000 and increasing the contract amounts of $230,000 for TRB and Associates and 4Leaf Inc. to $350,000. Increasing the 3-year total contract amount will allow continued service of highly qualified inspectors, and permit technicians. It will also allow the ability to provide continued plan review for all project types and for larger projects that required mid project plan review for deferred submittals, design changes, fixes, and other items that must be reviewed for code compliance. Funding to support the Professional Services Agreements for On-Call Plan Review Services is fully provided by building permit and TRPA application fees. The expenditures budget is being allocated accordingly and proportionally in each of the three annual adopted budgets for the term of the contracts. Funding for VHR inspection services is budgeted separately and partially offset by the VHR inspection fees and is not associated with building permit and TRPA application fees.

Environmental Considerations: Approval of the Professional Services Agreement amendment is not considered a project by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

Policy Implications:

Continued implementation of the California Title 24 Code of Regulation, TRPA Regulations, and City of South Lake Tahoe City Code
531

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Amendment #2
This Amendment modifies the Professional Services Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and BPR Consulting Group (“Consultant”) entered into on November 29, 2023 (C-246-2023).

The Professional Services Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Section 2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue until November 29, 2026.

Section 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed $230,000 $700,000 $950,000 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

Exhibit B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Estimated fees (not to exceed) $950,000
(travel is included in the TOTAL (not to exceed amount) TOTAL (not to exceed) $950,000
532

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Bill Rogers, Principal-In-Charge
Date __________________________ Date _________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date _________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date __________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
533

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Amendment #1
This Amendment modifies the Professional Services Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and TRB and Associates (“Consultant”) entered into on November 21, 2023 (C-246-2023).

The Professional Services Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Section 2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue until November 21, 2026.

Section 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed $230,000 $350,000 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

Exhibit B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Estimated fees (not to exceed) $350,000
(travel is included in the TOTAL (not to exceed amount) TOTAL (not to exceed) $350,000
534

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Todd Bailey, Principal-In-Charge
Date __________________________ Date _________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date _________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date __________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
535

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Amendment #1
This Amendment modifies the Professional Services Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and 4Leaf Inc. (“Consultant”) entered into on November 21, 2023 (C-246-2023).

The Professional Services Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Section 2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue until November 21, 2026.

Section 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed $230,000 $350,000 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

Exhibit B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Estimated fees (not to exceed) $350,000
(travel is included in the TOTAL (not to exceed amount) TOTAL (not to exceed) $350,000
536

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Kevin Duggan, President
Date __________________________ Date _________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date _________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date __________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
537

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Amendment # 1
This Amendment dated October 22, 2024, modifies the Professional Services Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“ City”) and BPR Consulting Group (“ Consultant”) entered into on November 29, 2023 (C-246- 2023).

Due to increased permitting workload, the Professional Services Agreement is hereby amended to increase the maximum compensation over the three- year term, as described below.

1. Section 3 (Compensation), and is amended to read in their entirety as follows:

Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant' s compensation, including travel and outof-pocket expenses, exceed $ 700,000 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

2. Exhibit B (Schedule of Charges) is amended to change the not-to-exceed amount from $230,000 to $700,000.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Bill Rogers, Principal- In-Charge
Date __________________________ Date _________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date _________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

Heather Stroud ( Oct 23, 2024 14:45 PDT)
10/23/24
Cody Bass ( Oct 23, 2024 15:12 PDT)
10/23/2024
Bill Rodgers ( Oct 23, 2024 15:18 PDT)
Bill Rodgers
10/23/24
538

Page 2 of 2 ends

By______________________________ Date __________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Susan Blankenship ( Oct 23, 2024 14:30 PDT)
10/23/2024
539
C-270-2024 BPR Consulting Amendment 1
Final Audit Report 2024- 10-23
Created: 2024- 10-23
By: Michelle Davis ( medavis@cityofslt. us)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA9dNIwDCvoG0q2tjU3xMg89Zx7lPp_ B4E C-270-2024 BPR Consulting Amendment 1" History
Document created by Michelle Davis ([email protected]) 2024- 10- 23 - 9:02:24 PM GMT
Document emailed to Susan Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2024- 10- 23 - 9:02:28 PM GMT
Email viewed by Susan Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. us) 2024- 10- 23 - 9:30:36 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Susan Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024- 10-23 - 9:30:58 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Heather Stroud ([email protected]) for signature 2024- 10- 23 - 9:31:00 PM GMT
Email viewed by Heather Stroud ([email protected])
2024- 10- 23 - 9:41:15 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Heather Stroud ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024- 10-23 - 9:45:44 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Cody Bass ([email protected]) for signature 2024- 10- 23 - 9:45:46 PM GMT
Email viewed by Cody Bass (cbass@cityofslt. us)
2024- 10- 23 - 10:12:08 PM GMT
Document signing delegated to Cody Bass ([email protected]) by Cody Bass ([email protected]) 2024- 10- 23 - 10:12:12 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cody Bass ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2024- 10-23 - 10:12:21 PM GMT - Time Source: server 540
Document emailed to Bill Rodgers ( brodgers@bpr- grp. com) for signature 2024- 10- 23 - 10:12:21 PM GMT
Email viewed by Bill Rodgers ([email protected])
2024- 10- 23 - 10:18:00 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Bill Rodgers ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024- 10-23 - 10:18:23 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2024- 10- 23 - 10:18:23 PM GMT
541
l.

2. CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 21 stday of November 2023 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation ("City"} and TRB and Associates.

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special serviceswhich will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT
S.cope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, " Scope of Services," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, Compensation Schedule," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

Term/ Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for three ( 3) years.

C-257- 2023
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
Sue Blankenship ( Dec 8, 2023 09:26 PST) Dec 8, 2023
Cristi Creegan ( Dec 8, 2023 09:37 PST)
Cristi Creegan
Dec 8, 2023
Heather Stroud ( Dec 8, 2023 11:00 PST) Dec 8, 2023
Todd Bailey ( Dec 13, 2023 10:18 PST)
Todd Bailey
Dec 13, 2023
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
Todd Bailey ( Dec 13, 2023 10:18 PST)
Todd Bailey
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
C-257-2023 PSA with TRB and Associates
Final Audit Report 2023- 12-13
Created: 2023- 12-08
By: Michelle Davis ( medavis@cityofslt. us)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAJ9aPBOwT8- vi8XN_ dtMK1e8r5VYjK2W6 C-257-2023 PSA with TRB and Associates" History
Document created by Michelle Davis ([email protected]) 2023- 12- 08 - 5:00:53 PM GMT
Document emailed to Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2023- 12- 08 - 5:02:49 PM GMT
Email viewed by Sue Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. us) 2023- 12- 08 - 5:25:59 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 12-08 - 5:26:23 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2023- 12- 08 - 5:26:25 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023- 12- 08 - 5:36:44 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Cristi Creegan 2023- 12- 08 - 5:37:03 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cristi Creegan ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 12-08 - 5:37:05 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Heather Stroud ( hstroud@cityofslt. us) for signature 2023- 12- 08 - 5:37:07 PM GMT
Email viewed by Heather Stroud ([email protected])
2023- 12- 08 - 6:59:07 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Heather Stroud ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 12-08 - 7:00:46 PM GMT - Time Source: server 602
Document emailed to tbailey@trbplus. com for signature
2023- 12- 08 - 7:00:48 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023- 12- 13 - 6:16:11 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Todd Bailey 2023- 12- 13 - 6:18:16 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Todd Bailey ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2023- 12-13 - 6:18:18 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2023- 12- 13 - 6:18:18 PM GMT
603

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 21st day of November 2023 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“ City”) and 4Leaf Inc.(“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/ Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for three ( 3) years.

C-256-2023 604

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant’ s compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed 230,000 without additional written authorization from City. Please note that the not to exceed number is cumulative across three consultant firms.

Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’ s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “ Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days ( 30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.

C-256-2023 605

7. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant’ s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

8. Consultant’ s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three ( 3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three ( 3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’ s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’ s business, City may, by written request by C-256-2023 606
any of the above- named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’ s representatives, or Consultant’ s successor- in-interest.

9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’ s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’ s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer- employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

10. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, ( and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’ s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/ her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
C-256-2023 607
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [ FPPC Reg. 18700( a)(2)].

11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’ s field of expertise.

12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/ her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied.

14. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect ( including any and all C-256-2023 608
costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’ s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’ s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’ s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’ s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’ s work under this Agreement.

15. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’ s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’ s Liability Insurance for his/ her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’ s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’ s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City C-256-2023 609
at least thirty ( 30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty ( 30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims- Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) on a claims- made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single- limit per occurrence basis.

C-256-2023 610
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’ s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’ s under Consultant’ s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/ or work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’ s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty ( 30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’ s insurance policies.

C-256-2023 611
The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’ s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant:

Provide a copy to: 4Leaf, Inc.
8896 North Winding Way
Fair Oaks, CA 95628

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual C-256-2023 612
relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

18. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

19. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094. 5, and as provided by law.

20. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

21. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’ s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’ s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

C-256-2023 613

23. Drug- Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 ( Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 ( a). b. Establish a Drug- Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355( b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’ s or organization’ s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355( c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’ s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’ s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant 1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

24. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

C-256-2023 614

25. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

26. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

27. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

28. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

29. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

31. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

32. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.

C-256-2023 615
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CONSULTANT:

By ________________________________
Kevin Duggan, President
Date _____________________________
Business License # 009764
Date ________________________________
Date ________________________________
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE:

By___________________________
Cristi Creegan, Mayor
Date __________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti- Lobbying Certification
C-256-2023
Sue Blankenship ( Nov 28, 2023 14:33 PST) Nov 28, 2023
Cristi Creegan ( Nov 28, 2023 14: 44 PST)
Cristi Creegan
Nov 28, 2023
Heather Stroud ( Nov 28, 2023 14:52 PST)
Nov 28, 2023
Nov 29, 2023
616

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
C-256-2023 617
C-256-2023 618
C-256-2023 619
C-256-2023 620
C-256-2023 621
C-256-2023 622
C-256-2023 623
C-256-2023 624

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
TOTAL ( not to cumulatively exceed) $ 230,000
C-256-2023 625
C-256-2023 626
C-256-2023 627

EXHIBIT C

ANTI- LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form- LLL, “ Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Kevin Duggan, President
C-256-2023 628
By:________________________________________
C-256-2023 629

ANY PROPRIETOR/ PARTNER/ EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/ MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR

LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER

CONTACT
NAME:

FAXPHONE
A/C, No, Ext): A/C, No):(
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER EXPTYPEPOLICY EFF POLICYOF INSURANCE MM/ DD/ LIMITS( YYYY) ( MM/ DD/ YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES ( ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
RENTEDCLAIMS- DAMAGE TO MADE OCCUR $ PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO- POLICY AGGJECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP
OTHER:$
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(
Ea accident)
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $

OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident)

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $
PER OTHSTATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY INSURER( S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A
Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement( s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
ACORD 25 (2016/ 03) 1988- 2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE ( MM/ DD/ YYYY)
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
4/7/2023
License # 0C41366
925) 462- 8400 ( 925) 462- 8888
25674
4LEAF, Inc.
2126 Rheem Dr
Pleasanton, CA 94588
35378
A 1,000,000
X X 6800J268720 4/9/2023 4/9/2024 1,000,000
5,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
000A1,000,
X X 8107R025623 4/9/2023 4/9/2024
000A6,000,
CUP1S364055 4/9/2023 4/9/2024 6,000,000
A
X UB2T357728 4/9/2023 4/9/2024 1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
B Professional Liab MKLV7PL0005809 4/9/2023 Each Claim 2,000,000 B MKLV7PL0005809 4/9/2023 4/9/2024 Aggregate 2,000,000
The attached forms apply as required per written contract or written agreements between the listed parties and the insured, which are subject to the policy provisions. In the absence of such written contract or written agreement the attached form may not be applicable.

City of South Lake Tahoe its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are named is Additional Insured as respects to General Liability and Automobile Liability per attached endorsements CG D3 81 09 15 and CA T3 53 02 15. Primary and Non- Contributory applies to General Liability per attached endorsement CG D3 81 09 15. Waivers of Subrogation apply to General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers Compensation policies per attached endorsements CG D3 81 09 15, CA T3 53 02 15 and WC 99 03 76.

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Airport Road
Suite #300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
4LEAINC- 01 MINED1
Granite Professional Insurance Brokerage, Inc.
360 Lindbergh Avenue
Livermore, CA 94551 commercial@graniteins. com
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Evanston Insurance
X
4/9/2024
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
630
0 0 ,
1 !"#(
234
0 ) 0 ) 0 0
563 ) ) / - 0 0
0 ) 7 0 . )
8 - ) .
0 0 ) . (
0% ) * ) 0 0 0 ) ( ( + %) ) %
0 ) 0 9
0 0 %)
0 0 ) 0 ) 0
0 ) 7 0 ( )
352 ) 5 <
631
1 ) 0 0
0 0 ( ( %
0 0&*.+= 0 -
0 ( - )
0 0 > , (
0 ) 0 ) 0 0 - 0 0 > )
0 0 ) 7 ( % & ) % ) &
1 )( (
0 0 ( ( )
0 0&
1 % 0 0
0 0 )
@(333 % % A - ) % 0% )
0 0 ) 0
B / % 0 0 ( 0 -
1 0 ) ( %
0+( ! "
8 1 % 0 0 * 0+ % + %) % +
0 0 / ( ) - ?
233 ) % - ) >&
0 0 )
0 0( % )
1 ( 2.$ 3 "!. # 4 /"!) 5" "!!.( ! 3( ! " 8
0 0 )( + (
0 0 ) ( ( %
@3 ) *$+ % -
0 0 ) ( ( / ) ) % ) )
0 ) 0( ) ( -
A ) B( % ( ,
A ) % ) ) B & % &
352 )
632
0 0&= /
0 0&
6$2
0 0 *#+ -
0 0 ) - .
0 0 (
1 % )
0 0 0 0 -
9 9
2"( 1 ) + ? 5(333 )
0 0&
0 0 )
0 0 0 0 -
0 & ( 7 " 68" " ( 0 0 0 0 >
A ) B9' ( ) ) +
C2 )( + *&+ A ) B9
D23 ) 0 0&*$+ % A ) % ) -
B9

A ) - , -
0 ) ( !) 8 !()(. 68" " ( B9
0 ) 0 . %) ) -
0 0 0 0&
1 ) ? 23 ) +
5(233 ) + - , ' ( !) 7"! %) ) %
7 . 5 ( 7 "$ /"! 3 5). ( ( "! (
0 0 ) &
0 ( /"! 7"! 7 . 5 ( 7 "$ /"! 3 5). (
5" 6(" . (
1 ) ) )
2 ! 8"!( 3 / ) %)
1 ) ?< 33 0 0 - + ) 0 0
0 0( 0 0 0 0
0 09
352 ) @ <
633
29" ( 4 . !" 8!" " ()(. 4 ! !) #(
352 )
634
635
636
0-*($+ % "$ 1 (& ' 2!(' $+" 3 1 + * (& + $'& 0 +* (& (&&! &!%& 2! +* *$ )' )-'-*($+ $/ 34 6 # 5
637
C-256-2023 PSA with 4Leaf Inc.

Final Audit Report 2023- 11-29
Created: 2023- 11-28
By: Michelle Davis ( medavis@cityofslt. us)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAuG1Wqcr2Abu- FX2R4V_ XrWH0Ifu_ Zy8O C-256-2023 PSA with 4Leaf Inc." History
Document created by Michelle Davis ([email protected]) 2023- 11- 28 - 10:09:39 PM GMT
Document emailed to Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2023- 11- 28 - 10:11:48 PM GMT
Email viewed by Sue Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. us) 2023- 11- 28 - 10:33:28 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 11-28 - 10:33:41 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2023- 11- 28 - 10:33:44 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023- 11- 28 - 10:43:50 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Cristi Creegan 2023- 11- 28 - 10:44:02 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cristi Creegan ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 11-28 - 10:44:04 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Heather Stroud ( hstroud@cityofslt. us) for signature 2023- 11- 28 - 10:44:05 PM GMT
Email viewed by Heather Stroud ([email protected])
2023- 11- 28 - 10:52:04 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Heather Stroud ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 11-28 - 10:52:55 PM GMT - Time Source: server 638
Document emailed to Kevin Duggan ( kduggan@4leafinc. com) for signature 2023- 11- 28 - 10:52:57 PM GMT
Email viewed by Kevin Duggan ([email protected])
2023- 11- 29 - 6:42:36 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Kevin Duggan ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023- 11-29 - 6:43:24 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2023- 11- 29 - 6:43:24 PM GMT
639
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:10
Agenda Item: Purchase Authorization - Rubrik Licensing and Support Executive Summary: Rubrik licensing and support provide the software entitlements, maintenance, and technical assistance required to operate the existing Rubrik environment at the Police Department and IT building, and to protect Microsoft 365 data. Maintaining current licensing and support is a key control for business continuity and disaster recovery planning, and helps reduce operational risk associated with data loss, ransomware, and system outages. This purchase supports the City’s information security posture and continuity of operations, particularly for public safety operations at the Police Department.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion: (1) Approving the purchase of Rubrik subscription licensing and support from Cadence under the State of California CMAS cooperative purchasing agreement in the amount of $67,484.12; and (2) Authorizing the Interim an/or City Manager to execute a Purchase Order for this and subsequent renewal agreements for Rubrik licensing and support, and other substantially similar data protection/backup IT subscription services, procured through valid cooperative purchasing contracts, provided that renewal terms are substantially the same as the current agreements; adequate funding is appropriated in the approved budget; and the authority remains in effect unless modified or rescinded by City Council.

Responsible Staff Member: Gabriel Raab, Network Systems Administrator Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Rubrik Licensing and Support.docx
02-Quote Rubrik Co-Termed Renewal.pdf
03 - CMAS Juniper -Rubrik Contract #3-20-70-3296E Addendum 2.pdf 640
Council Agenda Report March 24th, 2026 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24th, 2026
Title: Purchase Authorization – Rubrik Licensing and Support.

Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Gabriel Raab
Background: The City utilizes Rubrik backup appliances to protect critical server and data assets at multiple locations, including the Police Department and the IT building. In addition, the City relies on Microsoft 365 for email, collaboration, and productivity services. These appliances protect critical financial and public saftey workloads from cyberattacks. Licensing and support are required to maintain backup functionality, receive security updates, and access vendor technical support for incident response and recovery operations.

Issue and Discussion: Rubrik licensing and support provide the software entitlements, maintenance, and technical assistance required to operate the existing Rubrik environment and to protect Microsoft 365 data. Maintaining current licensing and support is a key control for business continuity and disaster recovery planning, and helps reduce operational risk associated with data loss, ransomware, and system outages. This purchase supports the City’s information security posture and continuity of operations, particularly for public safety operations at the Police Department.

The Enterprise Edition provides enhanced recovery and cyber-resilience capabilities commonly used in municipal operations, including:
• Rapid recovery for virtual and physical workloads, including granular (file-level) and fullsystem restores, to reduce downtime for critical services. • Immutable backup architecture and ransomware-resiliency features to help protect backup data from unauthorized modification or deletion. • Advanced search and recovery workflows to locate and restore specific items quickly (e.g., emails/files), improving operational recovery time. • Policy-based automation for backup and retention to standardize protection levels across departments and reduce administrative overhead.
641
Council Agenda Report March 24th, 2026 Page 2 of 3
• Reporting and monitoring to support operational oversight, alerting, and audit readiness.

Maintaining Rubrik licensing and support ensures the City can continue to protect critical data and systems, including Microsoft 365, and supports reliable recovery operations for both general government and public safety services.

Staff recommends the purchase of Rubrik licensing and support for a period of 1 year for the City’s Rubrik backup appliances located at the Police Department and the IT building, and for Rubrik coverage of Microsoft 365, in the amount of $67,484.12, to be funded from the IT Software Budget (Account 10001840-46122).

The City’s Rubrik backup environment has been implemented in phases to address different operational needs. The core IT Rubrik appliance and associated licensing were purchased in 2021, the Police Department Rubrik appliance and licensing were purchased in 2022, and Rubrik coverage for Microsoft 365 was added in 2023 to provide backup and recovery capabilities for cloud-based productivity data.

This recommended action consolidates the licensing and support for the Police Department appliance, the IT building appliance, and Microsoft 365 into a single cotermed renewal. Co-terming aligns all subscriptions to the same renewal date, which simplifies administration and budgeting, reduces the risk of partial expirations, and provides one coordinated invoice and renewal cycle for improved billing and contract management.

In addition, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager or Interim City Manager to execute future Rubrik subscription licensing and support renewal agreements for the City’s existing Rubrik backup environment (Police Department, IT building appliances, and Microsoft 365), when procured under a valid cooperative purchasing contract or other authorized procurement method, provided the scope, terms, and conditions are substantially similar to the current agreement and the annual cost is within available Council-adopted appropriations. Delegating this authority will streamline future renewals, reduce administrative delays, and help ensure continuous vendor support, security updates, and licensing compliance. Maintaining uninterrupted Rubrik licensing and support is critical to the City’s ability to protect and recover public safety and Citywide systems, restore Microsoft 365 data, and sustain reliable IT services to the community.

Financial Implications: Funding for this purchase in the amount of $67,484.12 per the attached quote is available in the current year’s 2025/26 budget in account 10001840- 46122. This purchase will be made utilizing the State of California’s California Multiple Award Schedules (CMAS) contract program. CMAS is a State-negotiated cooperative purchasing vehicle administered by the California Department of General Services (DGS) that establishes pre-competed contracts with vendors for information technology products and services at set terms, conditions, and pricing. Using a CMAS agreement allows the City to satisfy competitive procurement requirements through an approved cooperative contract, reduce procurement lead time, and obtain Rubrik licensing and support under standardized State contract provisions.
642
Council Agenda Report March 24th, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Environmental Considerations: This action is not a project requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

Policy Implications: This action is consistent with Strategic Priority Efficient Government, Action Item 2.8, Evaluate appropriate systems and tools for processes and communications that are cyber safe.
643
Remittance Address:
4010 Foothills Blvd, Ste 103 PMB205
3-20-70-3296E
Roseville, CA 95747
Phone: 844.934.8326
Company: City of South Lake Tahoe Date: 3/12/2026 Expiration: 3/26/2026 Attn: Gabriel Raab Shipping Method: NA Sales Rep:

Project: Price Summary - Rubrik PD + City Renewals Est. Delivery: TBD Direct:

CMAS# Terms: NET30 Email:

Part Number Description Qty. List Price Unit Price Extended Tx Disc % RS-BT-FE-PE-PP Rubrik Foundation Edition License + Premium Support 30 $1,654.03 $578.91 $17,367.32 N 65% RS-HW-SVC-PE-S2 Support for R6000S-2 hardware 1 $3,346.22 $1,171.18 $1,171.18 N 65% RS-BT-FUE-PE-PP Enterprise Edition Add-on for Foundation, Premium Support, Prepay
30 $1,198.55 $419.49 $12,584.78 N 65%
RS-HW-SVC-9S-S2 Support for R6000S-2 hardware 1 $3,346.22 $1,673.11 $1,673.11 N 50% RS-BT-FE-PE-PP Rubrik Foundation Edition; per usable BETB; Premium support; prepay (30 TB)
30 $1,654.03 $496.21 $14,886.27 N 70%
RS-BT-FUE-PE-PP Enterprise Edition Add-on for Foundation, Premium Support, Prepay
30 $1,176.00 $388.08 $11,642.40 N 67%
RS-UR-FE-MD-BS-PP One (1) month of Rubrik Foundation Edition for M365 - Basic support, Prepay (20 GB)
40 $15.90 $15.11 $604.20 N 5%
RS-UR-FE-MD-BS-PP One (1) month of Rubrik Foundation Edition for M365 - Basic support, Prepay (50 GB)
250 $31.81 $30.22 $7,554.88 N 5%
Sub Total: $0.00
Non Taxable: $67,484.12
Tax: $0.00
Credit: $0.00
Freight: $0.00
Total: $67,484.12
Tax Rate: 0.000%
Fax: 844.923.5878
www.cadence.team
Alison_Riccardi
916-237-0918
[email protected]
PD - Rubrik s/n: BB220664040012
CITY - Rubrik s/n: AA213464040037
Rubrik M365 Renewal + Co-Term
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Term: 3/15/2026 - 4/5/2027
Term: 3/30/2026 - 4/5/2027
Term: 3/15/2026 - 4/5/2027
Term: 4/6/2026 - 4/5/2027
Term: 3/15/2026 - 4/5/2027
644
Remittance Address:
4010 Foothills Blvd, Ste 103 PMB205
3-20-70-3296E
Roseville, CA 95747
Phone: 844.934.8326
Company: City of South Lake Tahoe Date: 11/13/2025 Expiration: 3/14/2026 Attn: Gabriel Raab Shipping Method: NA Sales Rep:

Project: PD - CO-TERM Est. Delivery: TBD Direct:

CMAS# Terms: NET30 Email:

Part Number Description Qty. List Price Unit Price Extended Tx Disc % RS-BT-FE-PE-PP Rubrik Foundation Edition License + Premium Support 30 $1,654.03 $578.91 $17,367.32 N 65% RS-HW-SVC-PE-S2 Support for R6000S-2 hardware 1 $3,346.22 $1,171.18 $1,171.18 N 65% RS-BT-FUE-PE-PP Enterprise Edition Add-on for Foundation, Premium Support, Prepay
30 $1,198.55 $419.49 $12,584.78 N 65%
Sub Total: $0.00
Non Taxable: $31,123.27
Tax: $0.00
Credit: $0.00
Freight: $0.00
Total: $31,123.27
Tax Rate: 0.000%
Terms and Conditions
Warranty: NA
Maintenance: NA
Terms: No Returns
Equipment: All orders invoice upon receipt of purchase order Customer Signature authorizes Cadence Team to process the order in place of a purchase order. Prices are subject to change after the expiration date of the quote.

Customer Signature:

Print:

Title:

Date:

Fax: 844.923.5878
www.cadence.team
Alison_Riccardi
916-237-0918
[email protected]
Rubrik s/n: BB220664040012
)
)
)
Term: 3/15/2026 - 4/5/2027
Term: 3/30/2026 - 4/5/2027
645
Remittance Address:
4010 Foothills Blvd, Ste 103 PMB205
3-20-70-3296E
Roseville, CA 95747
Phone: 844.934.8326
Company: City of South Lake Tahoe Date: 11/13/2025 Expiration: 3/14/2026 Attn: Gabriel Raab Shipping Method: NA Sales Rep:

Project: City Co-Termed Renewal Est. Delivery: TBD Direct:

CMAS# Terms: NET30 Email:

Part Number Description Qty. List Price Unit Price Extended Tx Disc % RS-HW-SVC-9S-S2 Support for R6000S-2 hardware 1 $3,346.22 $1,673.11 $1,673.11 N 50% RS-BT-FE-PE-PP Rubrik Foundation Edition; per usable BETB; Premium support; prepay (30 TB)
30 $1,654.03 $496.21 $14,886.27 N 70%
RS-BT-FUE-PE-PP Enterprise Edition Add-on for Foundation, Premium Support, Prepay
30 $1,176.00 $388.08 $11,642.40 N 67%
Sub Total: $0.00
Non Taxable: $28,201.78
Tax: $0.00
Credit: $0.00
Freight: $0.00
Total: $28,201.78
Tax Rate: 8.750%
Terms and Conditions
Warranty: NA
Maintenance: NA
Terms: No Returns
Equipment: All orders invoice upon receipt of purchase order Customer Signature authorizes Cadence Team to process the order in place of a purchase order. Prices are subject to change after the expiration date of the quote.

Customer Signature:

Print:

Title:

Date:

Fax: 844.923.5878
www.cadence.team
Alison_Riccardi
916-237-0918
[email protected]
CITY - Rubrik s/n: AA213464040037
)
)
)
Term: 3/15/2026 - 4/5/2027
Term: 4/6/2026 - 4/5/2027
646
Remittance Address:
4010 Foothills Blvd, Ste 103 PMB205
3-20-70-3296E
Roseville, CA 95747
Phone: 844.934.8326
Company: City of South Lake Tahoe Date: 11/13/2025 Expiration: 3/14/2026 Attn: Gabriel Raab Shipping Method: NA Sales Rep:

Project: M365 Renewal + CoTerm Est. Delivery: TBD Direct:

CMAS# Terms: NET30 Email:

Part Number Description Qty. List Price Unit Price Extended Tx Disc % RS-UR-FE-MD-BS-PP One (1) month of Rubrik Foundation Edition for M365 - Basic support, Prepay (20 GB)
40 $15.90 $15.11 $604.20 N 5%
RS-UR-FE-MD-BS-PP One (1) month of Rubrik Foundation Edition for M365 - Basic support, Prepay (50 GB)
250 $31.81 $30.22 $7,554.88 N 5%
Sub Total: $0.00
Non Taxable: $8,159.08
Tax: $0.00
Credit: $0.00
Freight: $0.00
Total: $8,159.08
Tax Rate: 8.750%
Terms and Conditions
Warranty: NA
Maintenance: NA
Terms: No Returns
Equipment: All orders invoice upon receipt of purchase order Customer Signature authorizes Cadence Team to process the order in place of a purchase order. Prices are subject to change after the expiration date of the quote.

Customer Signature:

Print:

Title:

Date:

Fax: 844.923.5878
www.cadence.team
Alison_Riccardi
916-237-0918
[email protected]
Rubrik M365 Renewal + Co-Term
)
)
Term: 3/15/2026 - 4/5/2027
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:11
Agenda Item: Ordinance Amending Vacation Home Rental (VHR) Regulations to Remove 150-Foot Buffer, Establish a Cap of 900 VHRs in Residential Areas, and Make Other Changes (Second Reading) Executive Summary: On March 10, 2026, City Council passed a motion to hold a first reading (by title only) of this ordinance by a vote of 3-2 (Mayor Bass and Councilmember Robbins no). This ordinance amends the VHR regulations to remove the 150-foot buffer and replace it with a cap of 900 VHR permits in residential areas, and makes other changes. If adopted at this meeting, the ordinance will become effective 30 days later on April 23, 2026,
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass an Ordinance Amending Article V (Vacation Home Rentals) of Chapter 3.50 (Transient Lodging) and Table 2.35.070 (Appealable Actions and Matters) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code.

Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - VHR Ordinance Amendments 2nd Reading.docx 02 - Ordinance - VHR Amendments.docx
03 - VHR Ordinance Redline.pdf
04 - Appeal Hearings 2.35 Redline.pdf
668
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: Ordinance Amending Vacation Home Rental Regulations (Second Reading) Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046 Background: On June 17, 2025, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2025-1200, amending the Vacation Home Rental (“VHR”) provisions of the South Lake Tahoe City Code, by a vote of 4-1 (Robbins no). The 2025 Ordinance made the changes to the City’s VHR regulations including the following:
 Established a 150-foot buffer between VHR properties outside the Tourist Core Area Plan, except for condominiums. (§ 3.50.380(F))
 Prohibited VHRs in “multifamily dwellings,” but allowed VHRs in attached condominiums for applicants who had a permit as of September 1, 2016. (§ 3.50.380(D)(2))  Excluded timeshares from VHR regulation. (§ 3.50.370)  Required VHR owners outside Tourist Core Area Plan to use local property manager to check in guests and go over the rules, ensure compliance with operating conditions, receive real-time indoor sound monitoring and outdoor video monitoring to head off nuisance issues, and respond to complaints in person 24/7. (§§ 3.50.070;

3.50.390(B)(1)(b), 3.50.440)
 Changed occupancy limits outside Tourist Core Area Plan to 2 per bedroom, with up to five children aged 13 and under not counting towards the occupancy limit. (§ 3.50.440(A)(1))  Required defensible space inspection prior to permit issuance, for properties outside Tourist Core Area Plan. (§§ 3.50.390(A)(7)(b); 3.50.410(B)(2))  Required all VHR properties to be operated, maintained, and managed in compliance with conditions of operation irrespective of whether they are being used as a VHR at a given time. (§ 3.50.440).
 Clarified that appeals of VHR permit denials and revocations appealed to the Planning Commission are final and not subject to further appeal to City Council. (§ 3.50.430)  Authorized permitting preference for prior VHR and Qualified VHR permit holders in good standing. (§ 3.50.390(A)(1))
In conjunction with adopting the 2025 Ordinance, City Council requested that staff bring back a report on September 9, 2025, to get an update on the permitting process and discuss potential further amendments. On that date, City Council passed a motion by a vote of 4-1 (Councilmember Robbins no), directing staff to bring back two versions of an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2025-1200, both of which removed the 150-foot buffer and replaced it with a cap of 1200 VHRs in 669
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 3
residential areas, but with Option 2 additionally prohibiting VHRs from being adjacent to each other.

On October 21, 2025, City Council considered both versions but there was no successful vote to make any changes at that time, so Council directed staff to bring this item back once a councilmember had been appointed to fill the remainder of former Mayor Wallace’s term.

On February 10, 2026, City Council again considered both versions and passed a motion to move forward with Option 1 with a modification to lower the cap from 1200 to 900 VHRs within residential areas (3-2, Mayor Bass and Councilmember Robbins no).

On March 10, 2026, City Council voted to hold a first reading (by title only) of the proposed ordinance and refer second reading and adoption to the meeting on March 24 (3-2, Mayor Bass and Councilmember Robbins no).

Issue and Discussion: The draft ordinance includes the following changes to Ordinance No. 2025-1200:
 150-foot buffer is removed and replaced with a cap of no more than 900 VHR permits in residential areas;
 To complement the cap, a waitlist is established when the cap is reached;  A minimum age of 25 is established to rent a VHR;
 Attached condominiums are allowed to get VHR permits unless the applicable homeowners association rules prohibit VHRs;
 Requires advertising platforms to include “family friendly” language for VHRs in residential areas;
 Appeals of permit denials go to an independent hearing officer instead of the Planning Commission;
 Commercial and recreational areas are regulated with rules applicable to the Tourist Core Area Plan;
 Room night reporting is required;
 The prohibition on permit transfers is clarified to match existing practice, where a permit may be transferred into a family trust in which an owner is a trustee for estate planning purposes; and
 The preferred application period provision has been deleted as that period has closed.

Environmental Considerations: This Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that they may have a significant effect on the environment, and under CEQA Guidelines section 15308 because it is amending a regulatory process to protect the environment.

Financial Implications: Financial implications are uncertain. This Ordinance would result in the maximum number of VHRs being 900 within residential areas, which could be more or less than would have resulted under Ordinance No. 2025-1200. Under Ordinance No. 2025-1200, which included a 150-foot buffer, the maximum number of VHRs outside the Tourist Core was estimated to be 1,100 but likely would have ended up being lower depending on the distribution of VHRs throughout the city.
670
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Policy Implications: VHR regulation involves competing policy implications. Limiting, restricting, regulating, and enforcing the rules regarding VHRs protects against nuisance issues such as noise, trash, overcrowding, parking violations, and degradation of neighborhood character, while allowing the operation of VHRs can have positive economic benefits for the City, local businesses, and community.
671
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 17
Ordinance 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 24, 2026
An Ordinance Amending Article V (Vacation Home Rentals) of Chapter 3.50 (Transient Lodging) and Table 2.35.070 (Appealable Actions and Matters) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to Modify the Regulation of Vacation Home Rentals

FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City may make and enforce all regulations and ordinances using its police powers.

B. The City has regulated Vacation Home Rentals (“VHRs”), currently defined as the rental of an entire dwelling unit for less than 30 days, since the adoption of Ordinance No. 928 on January 21, 2003.

C. Between 2015-2018, the City Council held more than 17 public meetings with dozens of hours of public comment at which the City Council deliberated regulations related to, nuisances created by, and the benefits and costs of VHRs within the City. At those public meetings, the City Council, staff, and community members expressed concern about excessive noise, disorderly conduct, vandalism, overcrowding, traffic, congestion, illegal parking, and accumulation of trash and refuse at or around VHRs located outside the Tourist Core. During that time, the City expended resources in responding to numerous citizen complaints pertaining to VHRs, which required rapid response from police, fire, paramedic, and other City personnel.

D. Measure T was a citizens initiative that passed in the election of November 6, 2018. Beginning after a phase-out period, Measure T prohibited VHRs in certain areas of the City where they had previously been permitted, including residentially-zoned areas, multifamily dwellings, and areas added to the Tourist Core after 2017.

E. Soon after Measure T passed, an organization called South Lake Tahoe Property Owners Group filed a lawsuit challenging Measure T on various grounds, El Dorado County Superior Court Case No. SC20180243. In February 2021, Measure T was upheld in its entirety by the El Dorado County Superior Court, and Plaintiff filed an appeal. The court of appeal affirmed the superior court’s judgment upholding Measure T, except that it remanded the case for the trial court to consider whether the “permanent resident” exception in the Qualified VHR provisions of Measure T violates the dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. At no time during the lawsuit was an injunction in place prohibiting the implementation of Measure T’s 672
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 17
prohibition on VHRs in certain areas of the City including residentially-zoned areas, multifamily dwellings, and areas added to the Tourist Core after 2017, such that VHRs in these areas were phased out by the end of 2021 as required by Measure T.

F. On March 13, 2025, the El Dorado County Superior Court issued a ruling finding that the Qualified VHR provisions are unconstitutional because they impermissibly discriminate against interstate commerce, and that these provisions are not severable from the remainder of Measure T, requiring that Measure T be struck down in its entirety.

G. On April 1, 2025, the City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2025-1193, establishing a temporary, forty-five (45) day moratorium on the issuance of Vacation Home Rental permits for Vacation Home Rentals in areas where such permits were prohibited by Measure T, pursuant to California Government Code section 65858(a). On May 6, 2025, City Council adopted urgency ordinance (Ordinance No. 2025-1196) by a four-fifths vote (with Councilmember Jinkens voting no) to extend the temporary moratorium through June 19, 2025.

H. On April 22, 2025, the City Council received a staff report and passed a motion by a vote of 3- 2 (Mayor Pro Tem Bass and Councilmember Robbins voting no) to make certain amendments to the pre-Measure T VHR regulations that were in place as of November 2018.

I. On May 6, 2025, City Council passed a motion by a vote of 4-1 (Councilmember Robbins voting no) to make further amendments to the proposed ordinance and bring back that ordinance for a first reading on June 3, 2025.

J. On June 3, 2025, City Council passed a motion to hold a first reading (by title only) by a vote of 3-2 (Councilmembers Jinkens and Robbins no), and on June 17, 2025, City Council voted to pass the ordinance by a vote of 4-1 (Councilmember Robbins no), and directed staff to bring back an update to the City Council meeting on September 9, 2025, to discuss potential further amendments to that ordinance.

K. On September 9, 2025, City Council passed a motion by a vote of 4-1 (Councilmember Robbins no) to bring back two versions of this Ordinance for consideration including Version 1, in which: the 150-foot buffer is replaced with a cap of no more than 1,200 VHR permits in residential areas, a minimum age of 25 is established to rent a VHR, attached condominiums are allowed to get VHR permits unless the applicable homeowners association rules prohibit VHRs, requires advertising platforms to include “family friendly” language for VHRs in residential areas, appeals of permit denials go to an independent hearing officer instead of the Planning Commission, commercial and recreational areas are regulated with rules applicable to the Tourist Core Area Plan, and room night reporting is required; and Version 2 that included the same changes except that the 150-foot buffer was replaced with a prohibition of properties with VHR permits being adjacent to each other. 673
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 17
L. On October 21, 2025, City Council considered both versions of the ordinance but were not able to reach a majority vote to make any changes and directed staff to bring the item back once a fifth councilmember was appointed to fill the remainder of former Mayor Wallace’s term.

M. On February 10, 2026, City Council considered both versions of the ordinance and passed a motion by a vote of 3-2 (Mayor Bass and Councilmember Robbins no) to bring back Version 1 for a first reading with a revision to lower the VHR permit cap in residential areas from 1,200 to 900.

N. Related amendments to Table 2.35.070 (Appealable Actions and Matters) are included in this Ordinance to clarify that appeal decisions of VHR permit denials and revocations go to a hearing officer and not Planning Commission.

O. On March 20, 2026, City Council held a public hearing and passed a motion by a vote of 3-2 (Mayor Bass and Councilmember Robbins no) to hold a first reading of this ordinance (by title only) and refer second reading and adoption to the meeting on March 24, 2026. On February 27, 2026, notice of this public hearing was published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune pursuant to California Government Code section 65090.

Now, Therefore, the City Council of City of South Lake Tahoe does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Article V (Vacation Home Rentals) of Chapter 3.50 (Transient Lodging) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

3.50.370 Definitions.
“Bear box” shall have the same meaning as set forth in SLTCC 4.150.010. “City manager” shall mean the city manager as set forth in Chapter 2.10 SLTCC, or their designee. “Condominium” shall mean a dwelling unit in a residential development that is under a legal arrangement specifying that the unit is individually owned but the common areas are owned, controlled, and maintained through an organization consisting of all individual owners. “Dwelling unit” shall mean a building, or portion thereof, that contains living facilities including provisions for sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation for the exclusive use of one or more people maintaining a household, not including city-approved hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, or timeshares.
“Electronic signature” shall have the same meaning as set forth in SLTCC 2.40.010. “Good neighbor contract” shall mean a document prepared by the city manager that summarizes the conditions of operations in SLTCC 3.50.440 for which occupants are responsible for compliance and subject to citation for violating, to be signed by wet or electronic signature before or during check-in by the property manager and the responsible party(ies) entering into a vacation home rental contract for each vacation home rental in areas outside the tourist core area plan. “Multifamily dwelling unit” shall mean a dwelling unit that is attached, meaning that it shares at least one wall, floor, or ceiling with at least one other dwelling unit. Condominiums are not considered multifamily dwelling units.
674
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 4 of 17
“Occupant” shall mean any person who is on or in a vacation home rental property other than service providers, whether or not the person stays overnight.
“Owner” shall mean the person(s) or entity(ies) that hold legal or equitable title to a dwelling unit. “Property manager” shall mean the person designated by the owner to implement the requirements of SLTCC 3.50.440 in residential areas. The owner or an agent designated by the owner may serve as the property manager.
“Renewal application” shall mean an application for a renewed vacation home rental permit which application may be submitted by the vacation home rental applicant. “Rent” shall have that definition set forth in SLTCC 3.00.010. “Residential areas” shall mean areas zoned for residential use and excluding all areas within the Tourist Core Area Plan, Tahoe Valley Area Plan, Sierra-Tract Commercial Plan Area Statement, South Y Industrial Tract Community Plan, and Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and parcels zoned for recreational use.
“Vacation home rental” shall mean the rent or rental of an entire dwelling unit by the owner or agent to another person or group of persons for occupancy, dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of less than 30 consecutive calendar days. The rental of units within city-approved hotels, motels, time-shares, and bed and breakfasts shall not be considered to be vacation home rentals. “Vacation home rental applicant” shall mean the person(s) or entity(ies) who apply for a vacation home rental permit by submitting and signing a vacation home rental application. A vacation home rental applicant may be an owner(s) of the dwelling unit, an agent(s), or another authorized representative(s) of an owner of the dwelling unit.
“Vacation home rental permit” shall mean a permit issued to the property owner and pursuant to the provisions of this chapter that allows the use of a dwelling unit as a short-term rental. “Vacation home rental property” shall mean a parcel of real property, as shown on the latest equalized tax assessment roll as maintained by the assessor of the county of El Dorado, upon which a vacation home rental(s) is (are) maintained. “Vacation home rental property” includes the premises upon which a vacation home rental is located, including parking areas, driveways, landscaping, accessory structures, fences, walls, swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, tennis and paddleboard courts, and other similar and related improvements.
“Waitlist” shall mean the list of vacation home rental permit applicants the city manager maintains when the number of vacation home rental permits issued in residential areas exceeds the cap of 900, to be maintained in the order each application is deemed complete and used when vacation home rental permits become available.

3.50.380 Vacation home rentals – General provisions.

A. Vacation Home Rentals Allowed. Subject to the provisions of this article, vacation home rentals shall be permitted within the city.

B. Vacation Home Rental Permit Required to Operate. It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to rent, maintain, facilitate, advertise or list a dwelling unit as a short-term rental without a valid vacation home rental permit issued pursuant to this article.

C. Vacation Home Rental Permits Nontransferable.
675
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 5 of 17

1. Permit – Site Specific. It shall be unlawful for any person to give, grant or otherwise transfer a vacation home rental permit from one dwelling unit to another.

2. Transfer of Permits Prohibited. All permits issued by the city pursuant to this article shall be nontransferable to a different person or entity to whom said permit was issued. (a) Notwithstanding subsection (C)(2) of this section, a permit may be transferred from one owner of a vacation home rental to another owner of the vacation home rental as long as the transferee was an owner of the vacation home rental at the time the vacation home rental application was submitted to the city, and a permit may be transferred into a family trust in which an owner is a trustee for estate planning purposes.

3. Upon any change of ownership of a vacation home rental property, an initial vacation home rental application shall be submitted pursuant to SLTCC 3.50.390(A).

D. Multifamily Dwelling Units and Condominiums.

1. It shall be unlawful to rent, lease, use or operate a multifamily dwelling unit as a vacation home rental.

2. Condominiums are eligible for vacation home rental permits, except for condominiums that are part of a common interest development subject to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq. and which condominiums are subject to a prohibition on short-term rentals adopted by the common interest development pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 4741, as may be amended.

E. Agency and Property Management.

1. An owner may retain an agent to comply with the requirements of this article, including, without limitation, the filing of an application for a vacation home rental permit, the management of the vacation home rental, and compliance with the conditions of the permit. The owner of the vacation home rental is responsible for compliance with the provisions of this article and the failure of an agent to comply with this article shall not relieve the owner of their obligations as set forth in this article.

2. In residential areas, owners are required to designate and maintain a property manager at all times.

F. Cap. The total number of vacation home rental permits issued in residential areas shall not exceed 900.

G. Transient occupancy tax shall be assessed for vacation home rentals.

H. Permits and Fees Not Exclusive. Permits and fees required by this article shall be in addition to any license, permit or fee required under any provision of the city code. The issuance of any permit pursuant to this article shall not relieve the owner of the vacation home rental from their obligation to comply with all other provisions of the city code pertaining to use and occupancy of the vacation home rental.

I. No more than one vacation home rental shall operate on a parcel.

3.50.390 Vacation home rental application procedures.

A. Initial Applications.
676
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 6 of 17

1. All persons or entities interested in operating a vacation home rental may submit a vacation home rental application along with the application fee in an amount set forth in the city’s master fee schedule.

2. It shall be the applicant’s responsibility to provide all information and materials required to comply with the vacation home rental application submittal requirements.

3. The filing date of the vacation home rental application shall be the date when the city manager officially receives the last submission of information or materials required by subsection (B) of this section and the application is deemed complete. If the city manager determines an application submittal is incomplete, a vacation home rental applicant shall be notified of such incompleteness within 30 calendar days of receipt of the vacation home rental application by the city manager. If the city manager does not receive a complete application within 30 calendar days of providing notice of incompleteness, the city manager shall no longer consider that application and the application shall be deemed withdrawn.

4. All vacation home rental applications which have been deemed complete by the city manager shall be reviewed and processed in the order of the application’s filing date.

5. Once an application is deemed complete, the city manager shall make reasonable efforts to schedule an inspection of the vacation home rental within 14 days. Vacation home rental applicants shall have 45 days to make all changes and improvements to the vacation home rental which are required by the city pursuant to the inspection. If the vacation home rental applicant fails to make all changes and improvements to the vacation home rental within 45 days of the inspection, said applicant’s vacation home rental application shall be deemed withdrawn.

6. The city manager shall continue to review applications and inspect vacation home rental properties until all applications have been reviewed, or in residential areas, until the city can issue no further vacation home rental permits based on the cap in SLTCC 3.50.380(F), and then shall maintain a waitlist. The city shall issue no more than 150 vacation home rental permits per month.

7. Inspections Required in Residential Areas.
(a) The city manager shall inspect all dwelling units in residential areas for compliance with this article prior to issuing a vacation home rental permit for said dwelling unit. (b) Vacation home rental permit applicants may be required to make improvements or changes to the proposed vacation home rental property in order to ensure that the proposed vacation home rental property conforms with all plan area statements and building code standards which were in effect at time of construction of the vacation home rental property and that no health and safety violations which threaten the well-being of guests, neighbors or the community are present at the vacation home rental property, including compliance with defensible space requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 4291, as may be amended.
(c) Notwithstanding subsections (A)(7)(a) and (A)(7)(b) of this section, inspections shall not be required for vacation home rental renewal applications.

B. Vacation Home Rental Application and Renewal Application Filing Requirements.

1. Vacation home rental applications and renewal applications shall be submitted on forms provided by the city manager and shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:
(a) Owner(s) name(s).
677
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 7 of 17
(b) Property manager contact information, in residential areas including local contact number with 24-hour, seven days a week availability for reporting violations. Any change in the property manager and local contact number shall be promptly furnished to the city manager. (c) Square footage of home.
(d) Owner mailing address.
(e) Proposed vacation home rental address and assessor’s parcel number. (f) Vacation home rental permit number, if existing vacation home rental. (g) Number of bedrooms in vacation home rental.
(h) Number of paved parking spaces on the vacation home rental property. (i) Identification of outdoor hot tub, if any.

2. Vacation home rental applications and renewal applications filed by agents, representatives, or authorized representatives of the owner of the vacation home rental property shall include a declaration that such application is being made with the consent of the vacation home rental owner.

3. Vacation home rental applications and renewal applications shall be accompanied by a declaration that any and all applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions are consistent with and would not prohibit issuance of a vacation home rental permit for the proposed property.

4. The vacation home rental application and renewal application shall be accompanied by an application fee in an amount set forth by separate resolution of the city council which amount is calculated to recover the city’s full cost of reviewing, issuing and administering said permit.

5. If a renewal application is denied, and the applicant wishes to operate a vacation home rental, the applicant must initiate a vacation home rental application by filing an initial application and complying with the procedures of subsection (A) of this section.

3.50.400 Expiration and renewal of vacation home rental permits.

A. Vacation home rental permits shall expire one year after their issuance.

B. Vacation home rental permits must be renewed on an annual basis prior to expiration by filing with the city manager a renewal application and a renewal fee.

C. If a timely renewal application is filed, the vacation home rental permit shall not expire until the date that the city manager approves or denies the renewal application. If a timely renewal application is not filed, the vacation home rental permit shall expire and shall be considered null and void.

D. A renewal application shall be subject to all filing requirements set forth in SLTCC 3.50.390(B).

E. The city manager shall issue or deny a renewal application in accordance with the provisions of SLTCC 3.50.410(C).

3.50.410 Review, issuance and denial of vacation home rental permit applications.

A. Vacation home rental permits shall only be issued to the owner(s) of the vacation home rental property.

B. Criteria for Issuance – Initial Application. The city manager shall issue a vacation home rental permit where they make all of the following findings:
678
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 8 of 17

1. The vacation home rental application is complete and the applicant has complied with the submittal requirements of SLTCC 3.50.390(B).

2. In residential areas, inspection of the vacation home rental property has shown that the proposed vacation home rental property conforms with all plan area statements and building code standards which were in effect at time of construction of the vacation home rental property, that no health and safety violations which threaten the wellbeing of guests, neighbors or the community are present at the vacation home rental property, that the defensible space requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 4291, as may be amended, are met, and that the applicable requirements of SLTCC 3.50.440 are met including verifying the parking areas set forth on the application, the required interior and exterior signage, lighting, and that the required noise and video monitoring devices are installed and operational.

3. Neither the vacation home rental property nor the vacation home rental applicant has received three or more upheld citations within any three events and/or calls for service for violations of the city code which citations were issued during three separate events and/or calls for service within any 24-month period, and the vacation home rental property does not have outstanding fines for any upheld citations. For purposes of this section, upheld citations means citations which were neither overturned on appeal nor dismissed.

4. The vacation home rental property contains sufficient paved parking spaces to accommodate the maximum number of occupants. All required parking shall be constructed on the vacation home rental property prior to operation as a vacation home rental.

5. The proposed vacation home rental would not exceed the cap of 900 vacation home rental permits in SLTCC 3.50.380(F).

C. Criteria for Issuance – Renewal Application. The city manager shall issue a renewed vacation home rental permit where they make all of the following findings:

1. The renewal application is complete and the applicant has complied with the submittal requirements of SLTCC 3.50.390(B).

2. There have not been three or more upheld citations issued for violations of the city code which citations were issued during three separate events and/or calls for service within any 24-month period, and the vacation home rental property does not have outstanding fines for any upheld citations. For purposes of this subsection, upheld citations means citations which were neither overturned on appeal nor dismissed.

3. The vacation home rental permit has not lapsed, expired, been revoked, or suspended.

4. The vacation home rental is current on transient occupancy taxes and has paid all said taxes to the city in full by the date upon which said taxes became due.

5. The vacation home rental permit has not been transferred to another person, entity, or property.

D. Criteria for Denial. Vacation home rental permits shall not be issued or renewed where the city manager confirms that one or more of the criteria for issuance set forth in subsections (B) and (C) of this section have not been met. If the city manager denies the vacation home rental application or renewal application, they shall specify in writing the reasons for the denial and notify the applicant that the decision shall become final unless the applicant seeks an appeal pursuant to SLTCC

3.50.430.
679
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 9 of 17

3.50.420 Revocation of vacation home rental permit.

A. A vacation home rental permit issued under the terms of this article shall be revoked by the city manager at any time if they conclude any of the following:

1. The vacation home rental is not current on transient occupancy taxes and has not paid all said taxes to the city in full by the date upon which said taxes became due.

2. There have been three or more upheld citations for violations of the city code which citations were issued during three separate events and/or calls for service for violations of the city code at the vacation home rental within any 24-month period. For purposes of this section, upheld citations means citations which were neither overturned on appeal nor dismissed.

3. The vacation home rental applicant has submitted a vacation home rental application containing a material misrepresentation or omission of a material fact.

4. There has been a transfer or an attempt to transfer a vacation home rental permit to another person, entity or property.

B. A vacation home rental permit suspended or revoked pursuant to this section shall be deemed to be expired and shall no longer authorize the operation of a vacation home rental.

3.50.430 Appeal from city manager’s determination.

An applicant or any interested party who disagrees with the city manager’s decision to issue, deny, revoke, or suspend a vacation home rental permit may appeal that decision to a hearing officer in accordance with the appeal provisions of Chapter 2.35 SLTCC. The hearing officer’s decision shall be final and is not subject to further administrative appeals.

3.50.440 Conditions of operation.

All vacation home rental properties shall be operated, maintained, and managed on a day-to-day basis in compliance with the following operational conditions and requirements, irrespective of whether they are being used as a vacation home rental at a given time. In residential areas, the owner shall designate and maintain a property manager to ensure compliance with the conditions set forth in this section. Violation of any of the below conditions of operation shall subject the owner to citation in accordance with SLTCC 3.50.450. Additionally, violation of conditions of operation set forth in subsections (A), (C), (H), (K), (L), (O), (Q), and (R) of this section shall subject any occupant found violating such condition to citation in accordance with SLTCC 3.50.450.

A. Maximum Occupancy.

1. Occupancy of the vacation home rental shall be limited by (1) the number of paved parking spaces on the vacation home rental property as shown in Table 1 of this subsection, and (2) the number of bedrooms in the property as shown in Tables 2(a) and 2(b) of this subsection, whichever is lesser. For purposes of this subsection, occupancy shall be calculated by the number of persons present at the vacation home rental property at any given time.

Table 1. Number of Paved Parking Spaces Establishing Maximum Occupancy Number of
Parking Spaces
Maximum
Occupancy
1 4
2 8
680
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 10 of 17
Number of
Parking Spaces
Maximum
Occupancy
3 12
4 16
5 20
Table 2(a). Number of Bedrooms Establishing Maximum Occupancy (Outside Residential Areas)
Number of
Bedrooms
Maximum
Occupancy
Studio 4
1 6
2 8
3 10
4 12
5 14
Table 2(b). Number of Bedrooms Establishing Maximum Occupancy (In Residential Areas) Number of
Bedrooms
Maximum
Occupancy
Studio 2
1 2
2 4
3 6
4 8
5 10
Outside residential areas, where the maximum occupancy for a vacation home rental is based upon the number of bedrooms, occupancy of a vacation home rental with one or more bedrooms shall be calculated by multiplying the number of bedrooms by two and adding four. In residential areas, where the maximum occupancy for a vacation home rental is based upon the number of bedrooms, occupancy of a vacation home rental shall be calculated by multiplying the number of bedrooms by two. For vacation home rentals with one or more bedrooms, up to five children aged 13 and under do not count towards the maximum occupancy. For studios, up to two children aged 13 and under do not count towards the maximum occupancy.

The voluntary reduction of occupancy in order to reduce fees is not permitted.

The requirements of this subsection limiting maximum occupancy based on number of parking spaces shall not apply to any vacation home rental that is within a common interest development 681
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 11 of 17
subject to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq.; provided, that the board of directors of the association governing the common interest development has implemented rules or regulations regarding parking for occupants of vacation home rentals within such common interest development.

B. Each parking space required for a vacation home rental permit shall remain available for vacation home rental occupants. Each parking space shall be no less than nine feet wide and 19 feet long.

C. Commercial Activity Prohibited. Vacation home rentals shall not be used for commercial activities, including, but not limited to, weddings, receptions and large parties. All occupants of the vacation home rental shall be notified of the prohibition against commercial activities prior to the reservation, rental, or lease of a vacation home rental.

D. The owner of the vacation home rental shall be responsible for compliance with all provisions of the South Lake Tahoe City Code.

E. The owner of the vacation home rental shall post a copy of the permit and a copy of the conditions set forth in this section in a conspicuous place within the vacation home rental property.

F. All marketing and advertising of the vacation home rental shall include the vacation home rental permit number issued by the city. In residential areas, all marketing and advertising of the vacation home rental shall include a statement that the property is in a residential area and is subject to enhanced regulations and enforcement to prevent disturbances and preserve neighborhood character.

G. The owner shall agree to and authorize the city to enter the vacation home rental for the purpose of inspections when the city has received complaints of substandard housing conditions and/or has been made aware of substandard housing conditions.

H. Use of all outdoor spas or hot tubs shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.

I. Interior Signage. Vacation home rentals shall have a clearly visible and legible notice posted on or directly adjacent to the inside of the front door, containing the following information:

1. The name of the property manager and a telephone number enabled for text messaging at which that person may be reached on a 24-hour basis, seven days per week;

2. The maximum number of occupants for the vacation home rental;

3. The maximum number of vehicles permitted to be parked on the vacation home rental property;

4. The parking rules for seasonal snow removal;

5. The trash pickup day and notification that solid waste and recyclables shall not be left or stored on the exterior of the property except in a bear box or animal-resistant cart or container approved by the city or its franchisee under Chapter 4.150 SLTCC;

6. Notification that an occupant may be cited and fined for creating a disturbance or for violating any provision(s) of this article; and

7. Notification that failure to conform to the parking and occupancy limits of the vacation home rental is a violation of this article.
682
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 12 of 17
J. Exterior Signage. Vacation home rentals shall have a clearly visible and legible exterior sign, posted in a location which is visible from the adjacent right-of-way, containing the following information:

1. The name of the property manager and owner of the vacation home rental, and a telephone number at which the property manager may be reached on a 24-hour basis, seven days per week;

2. The maximum number of occupants for the vacation home rental;

3. The maximum number of vehicles permitted to be parked on the vacation home rental property;

4. The telephone number of the police department vacation home rental hotline, and the police department’s email address;

5. This section of the South Lake Tahoe City Code.

K. Parking. Occupants of vacation home rentals shall not park on areas of the vacation home rental property not designated as parking spaces or on any other private property without permission.

L. Noise. In addition to all noise standards set forth in the city code and TRPA Code, the use of any equipment generating noise and the use of outdoor amplified music, speakers or other amplified equipment is prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.

M. Emergency lighting (which may consist of plug-in or permanently installed systems) shall be installed, maintained and functional within the home at all times.

N. Any lights used to illuminate a vacation home rental property shall be designed so as to not spray onto adjoining properties and adjacent rights-of-way.

O. Parking of commercial vehicle(s) on vacation home rental property, except temporarily for durations of less than four hours, shall be prohibited.

P. Records of every night for which the vacation home rental is rented, including the name and contact information of the tenant who has arranged to rent the vacation home rental, the rental rate, the number of occupants per night, and the number of vehicles, shall be maintained for a minimum period of three years before such records are discarded or destroyed. Such records shall be made available to the city within 15 business days upon written request from the city.

Q. Camping and sleeping in tents, travel trailers, campers or recreational vehicles shall not be permitted on the vacation home rental property.

R. Trash.

1. Owners are responsible for compliance with all requirements for sorting, disposal, storage, and collection of solid waste, recyclables, and yard trimmings in Chapter 4.150 SLTCC. Solid waste and recyclables shall not be left or stored on the exterior of the property except in a container(s) within a bear box or in an animal-resistant cart or container approved by the city or its franchisee under Chapter 4.150 SLTCC. Owners are required to acquire and use an animal-resistant recycling cart within 30 days of receiving notice from the city or its franchisee that such recycling carts are available.

2. If a bear box is installed on the vacation home rental property, then all solid waste shall be stored in said bear box until collection. All bear boxes shall remain functional and maintained so as to ensure that wildlife cannot access trash. The requirements of this subsection shall not apply 683
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 13 of 17
to any person whose vacation home rental is within a common interest development subject to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq.; provided, that the board of directors of the association governing the common interest development has implemented rules or regulations requiring and enforcing the regular disposal of trash within such common interest development.

3. For vacation home rental properties with a bear box installed, Table 1 of this subsection establishes the number of trash cans within bear boxes required.

Table 1. Minimum Number of Trash Cans Within Bear Box
Size of Home Number of
Trash Cans
Less than 2,500 square
feet
2 2,500 – 3,500 square
feet
3 Greater than 3,500
square feet
4 4. Vacation home rental owners and property managers shall arrange for the necessary level of trash pick-up, drop-off, or other trash removal from the property so as to ensure that no trash is left on the street, exterior of the dwelling unit, or the right-of-way.

S. Owner or authorized agent shall include the vacation home rental permit number on all contracts, rental agreements, and in any advertising or websites depicting the vacation home rental.

T. Transient Occupancy Tax. The owner of the vacation home rental shall remit all transient occupancy tax payments and comply with Article II of this chapter. The owner or agent shall report the number of room nights rented for each vacation home rental when remitting transient occupancy tax payments.

U. For properties in residential areas, the property manager shall meet the occupants either in person or virtually to check them in at the beginning of each vacation home rental to, at a minimum:

1. Verify the identities of all responsible party(ies) entering into a vacation home rental contract;

2. Verify that all responsible party(ies) entering into a vacation home rental contract are 25 years of age or older; and

3. Ensure that the property manager and responsible party(ies) have signed the good neighbor contract certifying that the property manager has reviewed the conditions of operation of this section with the responsible party(ies), which good neighbor contract shall be maintained for three years and made available to the city upon written request within 15 business days.

V. For properties in residential areas, the owner shall install indoor noise and outdoor video monitoring devices to immediately alert the property manager 24 hours a day, seven days a week, of potential violations of the conditions of operation of this SLTCC 3.50.440, including those conditions of operation related to noise, trash, and parking. The purpose of this requirement is to provide property managers with access to real-time information to allow them to prevent nuisances before neighbors are disturbed and to prevent violations of the conditions of operation. 684
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 14 of 17
W. For properties in residential areas, the property manager shall provide and maintain a local contact number with 24-hour, seven days a week, availability for receiving reports of violations from the city and neighbors, and the property manager shall be available to respond in person within 60 minutes to such complaints, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

3.50.450 Enforcement.

A. Any use or condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this article shall be and hereby is declared a public nuisance and may be summarily abated by the city pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 731 or any other remedy available to the city.

B. Any use or condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this article shall be subject to citation in an amount set forth by separate resolution of the city council.

C. The city may issue a citation based wholly or in part on photographic, video, or audio recorded evidence provided by a third party upon submission of a signed affidavit from the person who took the photograph or made the recording authenticating the evidence, if a preponderance of the evidence shows that a violation occurred.

D. Appeals of citations are subject to Chapter 2.30 SLTCC, except for any appeal of a third citation within a 24-month period resulting in revocation of a vacation home rental permit is subject to Chapter

2.35 SLTCC, and will be heard by a hearing officer along with the appeal of the permit revocation under SLTCC 3.50.430.

3.50.460 No property rights conferred.

Vacation home rental permits shall not be construed as providing property rights or vested interests and entitlements in continued operation of a vacation home rental. Vacation home rental permits are revocable licenses which expire annually. Vacation home rental permits shall not run with the land.

SECTION 2. Table 2.35.070 (Appealable Actions and Matters) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

Table 2.35.070: Appealable Actions and Matters
Permit or Action Type Reference
Section
Intermediary Appeal
Officer or Board
Final Appeal
Officer or Board
Tax Determinations 3.20.060

3.20.110
Tax Collector City Council
Emergency
Communication System
Access Fee

3.30.170 Finance Director City Manager
Business and
Professions Tax and
License

3.35.170

3.35.260
None City Council
Business Classification 3.35.310 Tax Collector City Council Revocation of Business
Permit by the Chief of
Police for Violation of
California Health and
Safety Section 11364.5

3.35.420 None City Manager
685
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 15 of 17
Permit or Action Type Reference
Section
Intermediary Appeal
Officer or Board
Final Appeal
Officer or Board
Transient Lodging Tax
Redetermination

3.50.130 Finance Director City Manager
Transient Lodging:

Occupancy and Permits

3.50.040 Planning Commission City Council
Vacation Home Rental
Permit

3.50.430 None Hearing Officer
Vacation Home Rental
Permit Third Citation
and Revocation

3.50.450 None Hearing Officer
Animal Control Fees 4.05.080 None City Council
Massage 4.15.040 None City Council
Bingo Permit 4.20.060 None City Council
Mobile Vending Permit 4.35.080 None City Council
Alcohol Use Permit 4.70.130 None City Council
Escort Permit Grant,
Denial, Suspension or
Revocation

4.70.200 City Manager City Council
Private Patrol Permit 4.140.090 None City Council
False Alarm Permit 4.145.070 None City Manager
Refuse and Garbage 4.150.025 None City Council
Taxicab Suspension or
Revocation of Permit

4.155.110 None City Manager
Cannabis Public Safety
License

4.180.050 None City Council
Hazardous Vegetation
and Defensible Space

5.30.100 None Hearing Officer
Land Use Development
Standards

6.10.090

6.10.250
See 6.10.090 Table 1 See 6.10.090
Table 1
Housing: Unit
Determination

6.25.080 None City Council
Multifamily Dwelling
Inspection and
Maintenance Program

6.30.170 None Building Board of
Appeals
Plan Line Setback:

Building Permit

6.35.060 None Planning
Commission
Signs 6.40.270 Planning Commission City Council
Trees 6.50.040

6.50.180
None City Council
686
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 16 of 17
Permit or Action Type Reference
Section
Intermediary Appeal
Officer or Board
Final Appeal
Officer or Board
Condominium
Conversion

6.55.210 Planning Commission City Council
Use Permit and
Variances

6.55.220

6.55.580

6.55.590
Planning Commission City Council
Special Events and
Temporary Use Permit

6.55.230 Planning Commission City Council
Hosted Rental Permit 6.55.295 None Planning
Commission
Cannabis Use Permit 6.55.770 None City Council
Floodplain Management 6.65.160 None City Council
Mobile Vending
Location

6.70.060 Planning Commission City Council
Wireless Facility
Permits

6.75.040

6.75.080
Planning Commission City Council
Urban Runoff and
Storm Water Quality
Violations

7.15.180 Public Works Director City Council
Grading, Erosion, and
Sediment Control
Decisions

7.20.260 None Public Works
Director
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, and under CEQA Guidelines section 15308 because it is amending a regulatory process to protect the environment.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is directed to certify this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.

SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its adoption.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 24, 2026 by the following vote:
687
Ordinance 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 17 of 17
Yes:

No:

Abstain:

Absent:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
First Reading:

Published:

Second Reading:

Effective:

The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
688
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 1/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

3.50.370 Definitions.
“Bear box” shall have the same meaning as set forth in SLTCC 4.150.010. “Buffer zone” shall mean the area within 150 feet of any property line of a vacation home rental property, except for condominiums, as measured using the city of South Lake Tahoe’s geographic information system data.
“City manager” shall mean the city manager as set forth in Chapter 2.10 SLTCC, or their designee.
“Condominium” shall mean a dwelling unit in a residential development that is under a legal arrangement specifying that the unit is individually owned but the common areas are owned, controlled, and maintained through an organization consisting of all individual owners. “Dwelling unit” shall mean a building, or portion thereof, that contains living facilities including provisions for sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation for the exclusive use of one or more people maintaining a household, not including city-approved hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, or timeshares.
“Electronic signature” shall have the same meaning as set forth in SLTCC 2.40.010. “Good neighbor contract” shall mean a document prepared by the city manager that summarizes the conditions of operations in SLTCC 3.50.440 for which occupants are responsible for compliance and subject to citation for violating, to be signed by wet or electronic signature before or during check-in by the property manager and the responsible party(ies) entering into a vacation home rental contract for each vacation home rental in areas outside the tourist core area plan.
“Multifamily dwelling unit” shall mean a dwelling unit that is attached, meaning that it shares at least one wall, floor, or ceiling with at least one other dwelling unit., except that cCondominiums within the tourist core area plan are not considered multifamily dwelling units. “Occupant” shall mean any person who is on or in a vacation home rental property other than service providers, whether or not the person stays overnight. “Owner” shall mean the person(s) or entity(ies) that hold legal or equitable title to a dwelling unit.
“Property manager” shall mean the person designated by the owner to implement the requirements of SLTCC 3.50.440 in residential areas outside the tourist core area plan. The owner or an agent designated by the owner may serve as the property manager. “Renewal application” shall mean an application for a renewed vacation home rental permit which application may be submitted by the vacation home rental applicant. “Rent” shall have that definition set forth in SLTCC 3.00.010. “Residential areas” shall mean areas zoned for residential use and excluding all areas within the Tourist Core Area Plan, Tahoe Valley Area Plan, Sierra-Tract Commercial Plan Area Statement, 689
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 2/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

South Y Industrial Tract Community Plan, and Bijou/Al Tahoe Community Plan Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and parcels zoned for recreational use.
“Vacation home rental” shall mean the rent or rental of an entire dwelling unit by the owner or agent to another person or group of persons for occupancy, dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of less than 30 consecutive calendar days. The rental of units within city-approved hotels, motels, time-shares, and bed and breakfasts shall not be considered to be vacation home rentals.
“Vacation home rental applicant” shall mean the person(s) or entity(ies) who apply for a vacation home rental permit by submitting and signing a vacation home rental application. A vacation home rental applicant may be an owner(s) of the dwelling unit, an agent(s), or another authorized representative(s) of an owner of the dwelling unit.
“Vacation home rental permit” shall mean a permit issued to the property owner and pursuant to the provisions of this chapter that allows the use of a dwelling unit as a short-term rental. “Vacation home rental property” shall mean a parcel of real property, as shown on the latest equalized tax assessment roll as maintained by the assessor of the county of El Dorado, upon which a vacation home rental(s) is (are) maintained. “Vacation home rental property” includes the premises upon which a vacation home rental is located, including parking areas, driveways, landscaping, accessory structures, fences, walls, swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, tennis and paddleboard courts, and other similar and related improvements. “Waitlist” shall mean the list of vacation home rental permit applicants the city manager maintains when the number of vacation home rental permits issued in residential areas exceeds the cap of 900, to be maintained in the order each application is deemed complete and used when vacation home rental permits become available.

3.50.380 Vacation home rentals – General provisions.

A. Vacation Home Rentals Allowed. Subject to the provisions of this article, vacation home rentals shall be permitted within the city.

B. Vacation Home Rental Permit Required to Operate. It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to rent, maintain, facilitate, advertise or list a dwelling unit as a short-term rental without a valid vacation home rental permit issued pursuant to this article.

C. Vacation Home Rental Permits Nontransferable.

1. Permit – Site Specific. It shall be unlawful for any person to give, grant or otherwise transfer a vacation home rental permit from one dwelling unit to another.

2. Transfer of Permits Prohibited. All permits issued by the city pursuant to this article shall be nontransferable to a different person or entity to whom said permit was issued. (a) Notwithstanding subsection (C)(2) of this section, a permit may be transferred from one owner of a vacation home rental to another owner of the vacation home rental as long as the transferee was an owner of the vacation home rental at the time the vacation 690
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 3/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025. home rental application was submitted to the city, and a permit may be transferred into a family trust in which an owner is a trustee for estate planning purposes.

3. Upon any change of ownership of a vacation home rental property, an initial vacation home rental application shall be submitted pursuant to SLTCC 3.50.390(A).

D. Multifamily Dwelling Units and Condominiums.

1. It shall be unlawful to rent, lease, use or operate a multifamily dwelling unit as a vacation home rental.

2. Condominiums are eligible for vacation home rental permits, except for condominiums that are part of a common interest development subject to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq. and which condominiums are subject to a prohibition on short-term rentals adopted by the common interest development pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 4741, as may be amended.

2. Notwithstanding subsection (D)(1) of this section, owners of multifamily dwelling units that are condominiums and had a valid vacation home rental permit at such condominium on September 1, 2016, may apply for a vacation home rental permit for said multifamily dwelling unit and will be issued or denied a permit or renewal permit based on the criteria of SLTCC 3.50.410.

E. Agency and Property Management.

1. An owner may retain an agent to comply with the requirements of this article, including, without limitation, the filing of an application for a vacation home rental permit, the management of the vacation home rental, and compliance with the conditions of the permit.

The owner of the vacation home rental is responsible for compliance with the provisions of this article and the failure of an agent to comply with this article shall not relieve the owner of their obligations as set forth in this article.

2. In residential areas outside the tourist core area plan, owners are required to designate and maintain a property manager at all times.

F. Anticlustering RequirementsCap. The total number of vacation home rental permits issued in residential areas shall not exceed 900.

1. Outside of the tourist core area plan, a vacation home rental shall not operate on a parcel located within 150 feet of another parcel outside of the tourist core area plan with a vacation home rental permit.

2. No more than one vacation home rental shall operate on a parcel.

3. Distances under this subsection shall be calculated as a straight line from any parcel line of the permitted vacation home rental property to the parcel line of any other parcel.

Locational restrictions shall apply to an entire parcel if any portion of the parcel is located within the applicable buffer zone.
691
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 4/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

4. Notwithstanding subsection (F)(1) of this section, condominiums are exempt from the anti- clustering requirements, meaning that no buffer zone around condominiums is required, and condominiums are not subject to buffer zones around other vacation home rental properties.

G. Transient occupancy tax shall be assessed for vacation home rentals.

H. Permits and Fees Not Exclusive. Permits and fees required by this article shall be in addition to any license, permit or fee required under any provision of the city code. The issuance of any permit pursuant to this article shall not relieve the owner of the vacation home rental from their obligation to comply with all other provisions of the city code pertaining to use and occupancy of the vacation home rental.

I. No more than one vacation home rental shall operate on a parcel.

3.50.390 Vacation home rental application procedures.

A. Initial Applications.

1. All persons or entities interested in operating a vacation home rental may submit a vacation home rental application along with the application fee in an amount set forth in the city’s master fee schedule. For applications in areas where vacation home rentals were previously prohibited under Measure T, the city council may, by resolution, set an initial application period for applicants whose vacation home rental permit at the same property that is in good standing and was not renewed in 2021 because of Measure T, and for applicants whose qualified vacation home rental permit at the same property is in good standing and became void in April 2025 because of the court’s judgment in the Measure T lawsuit. Applications in such areas that are submitted by applicants not qualifying for the initial application period will not be accepted until the initial application period has expired.

2. It shall be the applicant’s responsibility to provide all information and materials required to comply with the vacation home rental application submittal requirements.

3. The filing date of the vacation home rental application shall be the date when the city manager officially receives the last submission of information or materials required by subsection (B) of this section and the application is deemed complete. If the city manager determines an application submittal is incomplete, a vacation home rental applicant shall be notified of such incompleteness within 30 calendar days of receipt of the vacation home rental application by the city manager. If the city manager does not receive a complete application within 30 calendar days of providing notice of incompleteness, the city manager shall no longer consider that application and the application shall be deemed withdrawn.

4. All vacation home rental applications which have been deemed complete by the city manager shall be reviewed and processed in the order of the application’s filing date.

5. Once an application is deemed complete, the city manager shall make reasonable efforts to schedule an inspection of the vacation home rental within 14 days. Vacation home rental applicants shall have 45 days to make all changes and improvements to the vacation home rental which are required by the city pursuant to the inspection. If the vacation home rental applicant fails to make all changes and improvements to the vacation home rental within 45 692
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 5/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025. days of the inspection, said applicant’s vacation home rental application shall be deemed withdrawn.

6. The city manager shall continue to review applications and inspect vacation home rental properties until all applications have been reviewed, or in residential areas, until the city can issue no further vacation home rental permits based on the cap in SLTCC 3.50.380(F), and then shall maintain a waitlist. The city shall issue no more than 150 vacation home rental permits per month.

7. Inspections Required in Residential Areas.
(a) The city manager shall inspect all dwelling units in residential areas for compliance with this article prior to issuing a vacation home rental permit for said dwelling unit. (b) Vacation home rental permit applicants may be required to make improvements or changes to the proposed vacation home rental property in order to ensure that the proposed vacation home rental property conforms with all plan area statements and building code standards which were in effect at time of construction of the vacation home rental property and that no health and safety violations which threaten the well-being of guests, neighbors or the community are present at the vacation home rental property, including compliance with defensible space requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 4291, as may be amended.
(c) Notwithstanding subsections (A)(7)(a) and (A)(7)(b) of this section, inspections shall not be required for vacation home rental renewal applications. (d) Notwithstanding subsections (A)(7)(a) and (A)(7)(b) of this section, inspections shall not be required for vacation home rentals located in the tourist core area plan.

B. Vacation Home Rental Application and Renewal Application Filing Requirements.

1. Vacation home rental applications and renewal applications shall be submitted on forms provided by the city manager and shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:
(a) Owner(s) name(s).
(b) Property manager contact information, in residential areas including local contact number with 24-hour, seven days a week availability for reporting violations. Any change in the property manager and local contact number shall be promptly furnished to the city manager.
(c) Square footage of home.
(d) Owner mailing address.
(e) Proposed vacation home rental address and assessor’s parcel number. (f) Vacation home rental permit number, if existing vacation home rental. (g) Number of bedrooms in vacation home rental.
693
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 6/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025. (h) Number of paved parking spaces on the vacation home rental property. (i) Identification of outdoor hot tub, if any.
(j) Permit number and expiration date of prior vacation home rental permit or qualified vacation home rental permit held by owner(s) at proposed vacation home rental property, if any.

2. Vacation home rental applications and renewal applications filed by agents, representatives, or authorized representatives of the owner of the vacation home rental property shall include a declaration that such application is being made with the consent of the vacation home rental owner.

3. Vacation home rental applications and renewal applications shall be accompanied by a declaration that any and all applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions are consistent with and would not prohibit issuance of a vacation home rental permit for the proposed property.

4. The vacation home rental application and renewal application shall be accompanied by an application fee in an amount set forth by separate resolution of the city council which amount is calculated to recover the city’s full cost of reviewing, issuing and administering said permit.

5. If a renewal application is denied, and the applicant wishes to operate a vacation home rental, the applicant must initiate a vacation home rental application by filing an initial application and complying with the procedures of subsection (A) of this section.

3.50.400 Expiration and renewal of vacation home rental permits.

A. Vacation home rental permits shall expire one year after their issuance.

B. Vacation home rental permits must be renewed on an annual basis prior to expiration by filing with the city manager a renewal application and a renewal fee.

C. If a timely renewal application is filed, the vacation home rental permit shall not expire until the date that the city manager approves or denies the renewal application. If a timely renewal application is not filed, the vacation home rental permit shall expire and shall be considered null and void.

D. A renewal application shall be subject to all filing requirements set forth in SLTCC

3.50.390(B).

E. The city manager shall issue or deny a renewal application in accordance with the provisions of SLTCC 3.50.410(C).

3.50.410 Review, issuance and denial of vacation home rental permit applications.

A. Vacation home rental permits shall only be issued to the owner(s) of the vacation home rental property.

B. Criteria for Issuance – Initial Application. The city manager shall issue a vacation home rental permit where they make all of the following findings:
694
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 7/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

1. The vacation home rental application is complete and the applicant has complied with the submittal requirements of SLTCC 3.50.390(B).

2. In residential areas, inspection of the vacation home rental property has shown that the proposed vacation home rental property conforms with all plan area statements and building code standards which were in effect at time of construction of the vacation home rental property, that no health and safety violations which threaten the wellbeing of guests, neighbors or the community are present at the vacation home rental property, that the defensible space requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 4291, as may be amended, are met, and that the applicable requirements of SLTCC 3.50.440 are met including verifying the parking areas set forth on the application, the required interior and exterior signage, lighting, and that the required noise and video monitoring devices are installed and operational.

3. Neither the vacation home rental property nor the vacation home rental applicant has received three or more upheld citations within any three events and/or calls for service for violations of the city code which citations were issued during three separate events and/or calls for service within any 24-month period, and the vacation home rental property does not have outstanding fines for any upheld citations. For purposes of this section, upheld citations means citations which were neither overturned on appeal nor dismissed.

4. The vacation home rental property contains sufficient paved parking spaces to accommodate the maximum number of occupants. All required parking shall be constructed on the vacation home rental property prior to operation as a vacation home rental.

5. The proposed vacation home rental would comply with the anti-clustering requirementsnot exceed the cap of 900 vacation home rental permits in of SLTCC

3.50.380(F).

C. Criteria for Issuance – Renewal Application. The city manager shall issue a renewed vacation home rental permit where they make all of the following findings:

1. The renewal application is complete and the applicant has complied with the submittal requirements of SLTCC 3.50.390(B).

2. There have not been three or more upheld citations issued for violations of the city code which citations were issued during three separate events and/or calls for service within any 24-month period, and the vacation home rental property does not have outstanding fines for any upheld citations. For purposes of this subsection, upheld citations means citations which were neither overturned on appeal nor dismissed.

3. The vacation home rental permit has not lapsed, expired, been revoked, or suspended.

4. The vacation home rental is current on transient occupancy taxes and has paid all said taxes to the city in full by the date upon which said taxes became due.

5. The vacation home rental permit has not been transferred to another person, entity, or property.
695
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 8/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

D. Criteria for Denial. Vacation home rental permits shall not be issued or renewed where the city manager confirms that one or more of the criteria for issuance set forth in subsections (B) and (C) of this section have not been met. If the city manager denies the vacation home rental application or renewal application, they shall specify in writing the reasons for the denial and notify the applicant that the decision shall become final unless the applicant seeks an appeal pursuant to SLTCC 3.50.430.

3.50.420 Revocation of vacation home rental permit.

A. A vacation home rental permit issued under the terms of this article shall be revoked by the city manager at any time if they conclude any of the following:

1. The vacation home rental is not current on transient occupancy taxes and has not paid all said taxes to the city in full by the date upon which said taxes became due.

2. There have been three or more upheld citations for violations of the city code which citations were issued during three separate events and/or calls for service for violations of the city code at the vacation home rental within any 24-month period. For purposes of this section, upheld citations means citations which were neither overturned on appeal nor dismissed.

3. The vacation home rental applicant has submitted a vacation home rental application containing a material misrepresentation or omission of a material fact.

4. There has been a transfer or an attempt to transfer a vacation home rental permit to another person, entity or property.

B. A vacation home rental permit suspended or revoked pursuant to this section shall be deemed to be expired and shall no longer authorize the operation of a vacation home rental.

3.50.430 Appeal from city manager’s determination.

An applicant or any interested party who disagrees with the city manager’s decision to issue, deny, revoke, or suspend a vacation home rental permit may appeal that decision to the planning commissiona hearing officer in accordance with the appeal provisions of Chapter 2.35 SLTCC.

The planning commissionhearing officer’s decision shall be final and is not subject to further administrative appeals.

3.50.440 Conditions of operation.

All vacation home rental properties shall be operated, maintained, and managed on a day-to-day basis in compliance with the following operational conditions and requirements, irrespective of whether they are being used as a vacation home rental at a given time. In residential areas outside the tourist core area plan, the owner shall designate and maintain a property manager to ensure compliance with the conditions set forth in this section. Violation of any of the below conditions of operation shall subject the owner to citation in accordance with SLTCC 3.50.450.

Additionally, violation of conditions of operation set forth in subsections (A), (C), (H), (K), (L), (O), (Q), and (R) of this section shall subject any occupant found violating such condition to citation in accordance with SLTCC 3.50.450.

A. Maximum Occupancy.
696
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 9/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

1. Occupancy of the vacation home rental shall be limited by (1) the number of paved parking spaces on the vacation home rental property as shown in Table 1 of this subsection, and (2) the number of bedrooms in the property as shown in Tables 2(a) and 2(b) of this subsection, whichever is lesser. For purposes of this subsection, occupancy shall be calculated by the number of persons present at the vacation home rental property at any given time.

Table 1. Number of Paved Parking Spaces Establishing Maximum Occupancy Number of Parking
Spaces
Maximum
Occupancy
1 4
2 8
3 12
4 16
5 20
Table 2(a). Number of Bedrooms Establishing Maximum Occupancy (Within Tourist Core Area PlanOutside Residential Areas) Number of
Bedrooms
Maximum
Occupancy
Studio 4
1 6
2 8
3 10
4 12
5 14
Table 2(b). Number of Bedrooms Establishing Maximum Occupancy (Outside Tourist Core Area PlanIn Residential Areas)
Number of
Bedrooms
Maximum
Occupancy
Studio 2
1 2
2 4
697
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 10/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

Number of
Bedrooms
Maximum
Occupancy
3 6
4 8
5 10
Within the tourist core area planOutside residential areas, where the maximum occupancy for a vacation home rental is based upon the number of bedrooms, occupancy of a vacation home rental with one or more bedrooms shall be calculated by multiplying the number of bedrooms by two and adding four. Outside the tourist core area planIn residential areas, where the maximum occupancy for a vacation home rental is based upon the number of bedrooms, occupancy of a vacation home rental shall be calculated by multiplying the number of bedrooms by two. For vacation home rentals with one or more bedrooms, up to five children aged 13 and under do not count towards the maximum occupancy. For studios, up to two children aged 13 and under do not count towards the maximum occupancy.

The voluntary reduction of occupancy in order to reduce fees is not permitted.

The requirements of this subsection limiting maximum occupancy based on number of parking spaces shall not apply to any vacation home rental that is within a common interest development subject to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq.; provided, that the board of directors of the association governing the common interest development has implemented rules or regulations regarding parking for occupants of vacation home rentals within such common interest development.

B. Each parking space required for a vacation home rental permit shall remain available for vacation home rental occupants. Each parking space shall be no less than nine feet wide and 19 feet long.

C. Commercial Activity Prohibited. Vacation home rentals shall not be used for commercial activities, including, but not limited to, weddings, receptions and large parties. All occupants of the vacation home rental shall be notified of the prohibition against commercial activities prior to the reservation, rental, or lease of a vacation home rental.

D. The owner of the vacation home rental shall be responsible for compliance with all provisions of the South Lake Tahoe City Code.

E. The owner of the vacation home rental shall post a copy of the permit and a copy of the conditions set forth in this section in a conspicuous place within the vacation home rental property.

F. All marketing and advertising of the vacation home rental shall include the vacation home rental permit number issued by the city. In residential areas, all marketing and advertising of the vacation home rental shall include a statement that the property is in a residential area and is subject to enhanced regulations and enforcement to prevent disturbances and preserve neighborhood character.
698
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 11/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

G. The owner shall agree to and authorize the city to enter the vacation home rental for the purpose of inspections when the city has received complaints of substandard housing conditions and/or has been made aware of substandard housing conditions.

H. Use of all outdoor spas or hot tubs shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.

I. Interior Signage. Vacation home rentals shall have a clearly visible and legible notice posted on or directly adjacent to the inside of the front door, containing the following information:

1. The name of the property manager and a telephone number enabled for text messaging at which that person may be reached on a 24-hour basis, seven days per week;

2. The maximum number of occupants for the vacation home rental;

3. The maximum number of vehicles permitted to be parked on the vacation home rental property;

4. The parking rules for seasonal snow removal;

5. The trash pickup day and notification that solid waste and recyclables shall not be left or stored on the exterior of the property except in a bear box or animal-resistant cart or container approved by the city or its franchisee under Chapter 4.150 SLTCC;

6. Notification that an occupant may be cited and fined for creating a disturbance or for violating any provision(s) of this article; and

7. Notification that failure to conform to the parking and occupancy limits of the vacation home rental is a violation of this article.

J. Exterior Signage. Vacation home rentals shall have a clearly visible and legible exterior sign, posted in a location which is visible from the adjacent right-of-way, containing the following information:

1. The name of the property manager and owner of the vacation home rental, and a telephone number at which the property manager may be reached on a 24-hour basis, seven days per week;

2. The maximum number of occupants for the vacation home rental;

3. The maximum number of vehicles permitted to be parked on the vacation home rental property;

4. The telephone number of the police department vacation home rental hotline, and the police department’s email address;

5. This section of the South Lake Tahoe City Code.

K. Parking. Occupants of vacation home rentals shall not park on areas of the vacation home rental property not designated as parking spaces or on any other private property without permission.
699
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 12/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

L. Noise. In addition to all noise standards set forth in the city code and TRPA Code, the use of any equipment generating noise and the use of outdoor amplified music, speakers or other amplified equipment is prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.

M. Emergency lighting (which may consist of plug-in or permanently installed systems) shall be installed, maintained and functional within the home at all times.

N. Any lights used to illuminate a vacation home rental property shall be designed so as to not spray onto adjoining properties and adjacent rights-of-way.

O. Parking of commercial vehicle(s) on vacation home rental property, except temporarily for durations of less than four hours, shall be prohibited.

P. Records of every night for which the vacation home rental is rented, including the name and contact information of the tenant who has arranged to rent the vacation home rental, the rental rate, the number of occupants per night, and the number of vehicles, shall be maintained for a minimum period of three years before such records are discarded or destroyed. Such records shall be made available to the city within 15 business days upon written request from the city.

Q. Camping and sleeping in tents, travel trailers, campers or recreational vehicles shall not be permitted on the vacation home rental property.

R. Trash.

1. Owners are responsible for compliance with all requirements for sorting, disposal, storage, and collection of solid waste, recyclables, and yard trimmings in Chapter 4.150 SLTCC.

Solid waste and recyclables shall not be left or stored on the exterior of the property except in a container(s) within a bear box or in an animal-resistant cart or container approved by the city or its franchisee under Chapter 4.150 SLTCC. Owners are required to acquire and use an animal-resistant recycling cart within 30 days of receiving notice from the city or its franchisee that such recycling carts are available.

2. If a bear box is installed on the vacation home rental property, then all solid waste shall be stored in said bear box until collection. All bear boxes shall remain functional and maintained so as to ensure that wildlife cannot access trash. The requirements of this subsection shall not apply to any person whose vacation home rental is within a common interest development subject to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq.; provided, that the board of directors of the association governing the common interest development has implemented rules or regulations requiring and enforcing the regular disposal of trash within such common interest development.

3. For vacation home rental properties with a bear box installed, Table 1 of this subsection establishes the number of trash cans within bear boxes required.

Table 1. Minimum Number of Trash Cans Within Bear Box
Size of Home Number of
Trash Cans
700
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 13/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

Size of Home Number of
Trash Cans
Less than 2,500 square feet 2
2,500 – 3,500 square feet 3
Greater than 3,500 square
feet
4 4. Vacation home rental owners and property managers shall arrange for the necessary level of trash pick-up, drop-off, or other trash removal from the property so as to ensure that no trash is left on the street, exterior of the dwelling unit, or the right-of-way.

S. Owner or authorized agent shall include the vacation home rental permit number on all contracts, rental agreements, and in any advertising or websites depicting the vacation home rental.

T. Transient Occupancy Tax. The owner of the vacation home rental shall remit all transient occupancy tax payments and comply with Article II of this chapter. The owner or agent shall report the number of room nights rented for each vacation home rental when remitting transient occupancy tax payments.

U. For properties outside the tourist core area planin residential areas, the property manager shall meet the occupants either in person or virtually to check them in at the beginning of each vacation home rental to, at a minimum:

1. Verify the identities of all responsible party(ies) entering into a vacation home rental contract; and

2. Verify that all responsible party(ies) entering into a vacation home rental contract are 25 years of age or older; and

23. Ensure that the property manager and responsible party(ies) have signed the good neighbor contract certifying that the property manager has reviewed the conditions of operation of this section with the responsible party(ies), which good neighbor contract shall be maintained for three years and made available to the city upon written request within 15 business days.

V. For properties outside the tourist core area planin residential areas, the owner shall install indoor noise and outdoor video monitoring devices to immediately alert the property manager 24 hours a day, seven days a week, of potential violations of the conditions of operation of this SLTCC 3.50.440, including those conditions of operation related to noise, trash, and parking.

The purpose of this requirement is to provide property managers with access to real-time information to allow them to prevent nuisances before neighbors are disturbed and to prevent violations of the conditions of operation.

W. For properties outside the tourist core area planin residential areas, the property manager shall provide and maintain a local contact number with 24-hour, seven days a week, availability for receiving reports of violations from the city and neighbors, and the property manager shall be 701
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 14/14
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025. available to respond in person within 60 minutes to such complaints, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

3.50.450 Enforcement.

A. Any use or condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this article shall be and hereby is declared a public nuisance and may be summarily abated by the city pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 731 or any other remedy available to the city.

B. Any use or condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this article shall be subject to citation in an amount set forth by separate resolution of the city council.

C. The city may issue a citation based wholly or in part on photographic, video, or audio recorded evidence provided by a third party upon submission of a signed affidavit from the person who took the photograph or made the recording authenticating the evidence, if a preponderance of the evidence shows that a violation occurred.

D. Appeals of citations are subject to Chapter 2.30 SLTCC, except for any appeal of a third citation within a 24-month period resulting in revocation of a vacation home rental permit is subject to Chapter 2.35 SLTCC, and will be heard by the planning commissiona hearing officer along with the appeal of the permit revocation under SLTCC 3.50.430.

3.50.460 No property rights conferred.

Vacation home rental permits shall not be construed as providing property rights or vested interests and entitlements in continued operation of a vacation home rental. Vacation home rental permits are revocable licenses which expire annually. Vacation home rental permits shall not run with the land.
702
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 1/3
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

2.35.070 Appeal hearings.

The hearing officer, board, commission or council of the city shall, upon timely receipt of a notice of appeal that complies with this chapter, schedule a hearing on the appeal. The hearing officer, board, commission or council shall either (1) make findings of fact at the appeal hearing, which findings of fact are based upon the evidence submitted and determine whether grounds exist for denial of the appeal; or (2) make findings of fact after the appeal hearing and in writing, notifying the appellant of the hearing officer, board, commission, or council’s decision.

Table 2.35.070 sets forth the various appealable actions and matters as well as the officer, board, commission or council charged with the responsibility of hearing each appealable action and matter. Intermediary appeals shall be first made to the intermediary appeal officer or board.

Appeals of decisions made by the intermediary appeal officer or board may be made to the final appeal officer or board. The decision of the final appeal officer or board shall be final and may not be appealed.

Table 2.35.070: Appealable Actions and Matters
Permit or Action Type Reference Section Intermediary Appeal Officer or Board
Final Appeal
Officer or Board
Tax Determinations 3.20.060

3.20.110
Tax Collector City Council
Emergency
Communication System
Access Fee

3.30.170 Finance Director City Manager
Business and Professions
Tax and License

3.35.170

3.35.260
None City Council
Business Classification 3.35.310 Tax Collector City Council Revocation of Business
Permit by the Chief of
Police for Violation of
California Health and
Safety Section 11364.5

3.35.420 None City Manager
Transient Lodging Tax
Redetermination

3.50.130 Finance Director City Manager
Transient Lodging:

Occupancy and Permits

3.50.040 Planning Commission City Council
Vacation Home Rental
Permit

3.50.430 None Planning
CommissionHearing
Officer
Vacation Home Rental
Permit Third Citation and
Revocation

3.50.450 None Planning
CommissionHearing
Officer
703
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 2/3
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

Permit or Action Type Reference Section Intermediary Appeal Officer or Board
Final Appeal
Officer or Board
Animal Control Fees 4.05.080 None City Council
Massage 4.15.040 None City Council
Bingo Permit 4.20.060 None City Council
Mobile Vending Permit 4.35.080 None City Council
Alcohol Use Permit 4.70.130 None City Council
Escort Permit Grant,
Denial, Suspension or
Revocation

4.70.200 City Manager City Council
Private Patrol Permit 4.140.090 None City Council
False Alarm Permit 4.145.070 None City Manager
Refuse and Garbage 4.150.025 None City Council
Taxicab Suspension or
Revocation of Permit

4.155.110 None City Manager
Cannabis Public Safety
License

4.180.050 None City Council
Hazardous Vegetation
and Defensible Space

5.30.100 None Hearing Officer
Land Use Development
Standards

6.10.090

6.10.250
See 6.10.090 Table 1 See 6.10.090
Table 1
Housing: Unit
Determination

6.25.080 None City Council
Multifamily Dwelling
Inspection and
Maintenance Program

6.30.170 None Building Board of
Appeals
Plan Line Setback:

Building Permit

6.35.060 None Planning
Commission
Signs 6.40.270 Planning Commission City Council
Trees 6.50.040

6.50.180
None City Council
Condominium
Conversion

6.55.210 Planning Commission City Council
Use Permit and Variances 6.55.220

6.55.580

6.55.590
Planning Commission City Council
Special Events and 6.55.230 Planning Commission City Council 704
South Lake Tahoe City Code Page 3/3
The South Lake Tahoe City Code is current through Ordinance 1200, passed June 17, 2025.

Permit or Action Type Reference Section Intermediary Appeal Officer or Board
Final Appeal
Officer or Board
Temporary Use Permit
Hosted Rental Permit 6.55.295 None Planning
Commission
Cannabis Use Permit 6.55.770 None City Council
Floodplain Management 6.65.160 None City Council
Mobile Vending Location 6.70.060 Planning Commission City Council Wireless Facility Permits 6.75.040

6.75.080
Planning Commission City Council
Urban Runoff and Storm
Water Quality Violations

7.15.180 Public Works Director City Council
Grading, Erosion, and
Sediment Control
Decisions

7.20.260 None Public Works
Director
705
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:12
Agenda Item: Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Mid-Year Budget Review, Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing, and Five-Year Financial Plan Update Executive Summary: The annual mid-year budget review is an essential element in maintaining the City's financial stability. It provides the City Council an opportunity to review the General Fund and other funds' budget status, adjust amounts in order to achieve a more accurate budget for the current fiscal year and help shape the development of next year's budget. The Five-Year Financial Plan update provides a forecast of revenues and expenditures for the General Fund over the five-year period for fiscal years 2026-2027 through 2030-2031. The Five-Year Financial Plan provides a multi-year view of the financial picture and allows for strategic discussions and planning needed to balance the General Fund budget and address City Council updated Strategic Plan 2025-2030 ensuring the City's financial sustainability in providing the community with core services, infrastructure and facilities improvements.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving FY 2025-2026 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments, Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Positions Listing for Changes Made during MidYear and Corresponding Salary Tables.

Responsible Staff Member: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance and Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report Mid Year Budget 5yr Plan Mar 2026 rv.docx 02-Resolution Mid-year Budget 2025-2026.docx
03-Position Allocation 25-26 Mar 2026 (Exh. A to Reso).pdf 04-Slry Tbls for Reso eff 3.28.2026 (Exh. B to Reso).pdf 05-5yr Financial Plan & Assumptions March 2026.pdf
06-General Fund Undesignated Fund Balance Activity Mar 2026.pdf 07-Strategic Plan Status Update March 2026
08-Public Works Remaining Workplan FY25-26
706
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 8
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: FY 2025-2026 Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan Update Location: All Departments
Responsible Staff Members: Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Background: The annual mid-year budget review is an important tool for maintaining the City’s financial stability. It provides the City Council with an opportunity to review the City’s fiscal condition and consider recommended budget amendments based on operational needs, unanticipated developments, and the City Council’s priorities for the current fiscal year. The midyear review also helps inform the development of the following year’s budget. The recommended amendments support the goals and initiatives outlined in the City’s 2025-2030 Strategic Plan, adopted by the City Council on May 6, 2025.

In accordance with recommendations from financial experts and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) on the importance for public agencies to conduct long-term financial planning, the City has been producing a Five-Year Financial Forecast annually since 2011. This forecast provides the public and City Council with critical information to guide financial and policy decisions.

When preparing the financial forecast, the City considers a variety of economic indicators to estimate revenues and expenditures over the five-year period. This multi-year analysis allows for strategic discussions and planning, ensuring the City’s long-term financial stability. Financial stability enables the City to provide core services, improve infrastructure and facilities, and address the City Council’s strategic priorities.

Issue and Discussion: The City’s FY 2025-2026 (FY 2026) budget reflects a positive but cautious outlook. Overall, current-year operating revenues are projected to remain largely flat compared to the adopted budget, with modest increases anticipated in several non-major revenue sources and Property Tax. Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax projections remain largely unchanged. Additional expenditure allocations are recommended for City services, capital projects, and implementation of City Council Strategic Priorities.

Mid-Year Budget Review
The current General Fund budget, after incorporating carry-forward appropriations, grants rollforward true-ups, and other adjustments approved by the City Council since the budget adoption (Attachment 06), reflect the use of $1,103,350 from General Fund undesignated excess reserves. The primary contributor to this net use of reserves is the carry-forward appropriations from FY 2025 approved by the City Council on October 21, 2025, for projects and purchases that were not completed in the prior fiscal year.
707
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 8
As part of the FY 2026 budget adoption presentation, the undesignated excess reserve was conservatively estimated at $1.6 million as of September 30, 2025. This estimate was later revised to approximately $4.1 million, as described in the FY 2026 budget document (p. 25). The actual excess reserve ultimately totaled $6.6 million. The increase in the final excess reserve balance resulted from expenditure savings of approximately $2.4 million (3.5%) and revenues exceeding projections by approximately $3.6 million (5.6%). The higher-than-anticipated reserve balance provides additional flexibility to address critical capital needs in accordance with the City’s committed reserve policy, which prioritizes the use of excess reserves for capital projects or other appropriations authorized by the City Council.

After accounting for carry-forward appropriations and other adjustments approved since adoption of the FY 2026 budget, approximately $5.5 million remains available for allocation at the City Council’s discretion. The proposed mid-year budget adjustments recommend allocating $4,062,393 of this amount to address critical capital and operating needs.

General Fund Revenue Adjustments
The recommended revenue adjustments for the General Fund total $1,561,474 and include the following:
 Property Tax Revenue: +$358,000 based on the first of two installments of property tax revenues received from El Dorado County. The City participates in the County’s Teeter plan, which requires the County to distribute the City’s full share of property tax based on current assessed values, regardless of actual collections. The County retains all interest and penalties resulting from delinquent tax payments.
 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): +$160,000 based on year-to-date performance and prior year actual results. The increase is primarily attributable to Redevelopment Area hotels.

Through December occupancy, TOT revenue collection is 5.6% lower citywide compared to the prior year.
 Property Tax in Lieu of MVLF: +$105,000 based on current year actuals.  Motor Vehicle In Lieu Tax: +$33,000 based on current year actuals.  Parking Citation Revenue: -$300,000 based on prior year actuals and current year revenues to date.
 Water Franchise Fees: +$16,000 based on actual receipts in FY 2025.  Miscellaneous Revenue Adjustments (net): +$111,306 reflecting several smaller revenue sources, including EV charging stations, golf course revenues, campground revenues, rebates, contractual reimbursements, real property transfer tax, and Mello Roos Tax, based on FY 2025 or current FY 2026 receipts.
 Transfer in from Recreation Center Capital Project: +$896,763 to return funding previously allocated from the General Fund as part of the Recreation Center Phase 2 budget reconciliation upon award of the Roebbelen construction contract. Funding is available from interest earnings in the bonds proceeds project account and is being transferred to the CIP account for use on the Roebbelen contract.
 Transfer in from Measure S Sales tax: +$127,720 to reimburse the General Fund for the actual FY 2025 cost of seven firefighters previously partially funded by the SAFER grant thru 2022.
 Transfer in from other Capital Project accounts: +$21,185 to close out completed capital projects, including Public Works relocation to 1740 D Street, software upgrade, and other projects.
708
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 8
 Transfer in from Stormwater fund: +$30,000 for Chipper Program equipment charges.  Transfer in from Opioid Abatement fund: +$2,500 to reimburse the General Fund for staff time.

General Fund Expenditure Adjustments
Operational adjustments reflect updated departmental needs, cost reallocations, and interfund transfers necessary to support ongoing City operations.

The recommended expenditure adjustments for the General Fund total $5,623,867 and include the following categories and items:

Personnel Needs:
 +$204,470 for two new full-time Police Officer positions for a portion of FY 2026, as approved by the City Council at the February 24, 2026 meeting, to support the Boat Patrol program.  +$75,000 for additional temporary and seasonal staffing in the Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Police Departments.
 +$11,588 for increases to Police Department overtime, position reclassifications in the City Manager’s Office and Finance Department, and vacation payouts across multiple departments, partially offset by reductions in health insurance benefit costs, as previously presented to the City Council on September 22, 2025.
 +$229,718 for an increase in the CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) prepayment, based on the June 30, 2024 actuarial valuation reports received in August 2025. These reports incorporate demographic data and financial information through June 30, 2024, including the FY 2024 investment return of 9.3%. While this return exceeded the 6.8% target (the discount rate) required to maintain the plan’s funded status and prevent additional increases to the UAL, it does not immediately reduce the City’s FY 2026 UAL payment due to the ramp-up methodology used by CalPERS. Positive investment performance from FY 2024 and FY 2025 (11.6%) will be phased into future rates over the next two decades.

Operational Needs:
 +$191,723 (net) for operational needs in the City Clerk, City Attorney, City Manager’s Office, and Finance Department (including IT). These costs include travel and training, implementation of the 311 citizen request platform, GovAI services, a new access control system at 1700 D Street, city manager recruitment consulting services, IT software subscription renewals, HR-related contracts and other operational expenses.  +$114,000 for Police Department needs, including communications costs, ammunition, utility cost, and replacement of ballistic vests.
 +$25,008 (net) for Fire Department needs, including mobile radios, equipment purchases and replacement of fire station mattresses.
 -$67,000 (net) for Public Works Department needs, including truck rental and software upgrades, offset by cost savings from the City Engineer contract.  +$220,476 for Parks and Recreation needs, including travel and training, equipment replacement, materials for the turf elimination project, budget reallocation for golf and parks division equipment previously allocated in the Vehicle Replacement Fund in the adopted budget, cleaning supplies for the new Recreation Center, increased electricity costs, and limited maintenance of the existing Recreation Center.
709
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 4 of 8
 +$904,470 in various Transfers Out, including:
o transfer out to the Debt Service Fund to address a funding shortfall in the adopted budget;
o transfer out to the Health Insurance fund due to additional expenditure accruals recognized in FY 2025 in accordance with accounting rules; o transfer out to the Ice Arena Fund to reimburse additional costs incurred in FY 2025; and
o transfer out to the AB 939 Fund and the Vehicle Replacement Fund for vehicle purchases, including replacement of a destroyed trash compactor truck (largely funded through insurance reimbursement), a liftgate for the new Recreation maintenance team, and two trucks for the Parks division to replace vehicles that are no longer operable.

Capital Needs:

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Requests total $3,714,414 in Transfers Out:
 +$250,000 for Eloise Street road maintenance to address maintenance previously requested by the City Council.
 +$300,000 for the Upper Truckee River Bridget Protection project.  +$1,000,000 for the El Dorado Beach Project to fund Phase 2 design and a portion of construction costs.
 +$194,414 for the Upper Bijou Park Creek Project to prepare separate construction drawings for the remaining six subprojects.
 +$800,000 for the James-Eloise Drainage Project to replace a failing storm drain.  +$400,000 for the Drainage Master Plan Update Project.  +$75,000 for the Citywide Energy Upgrade project to extend construction management services contract.
 +$450,000 for Phase 2 of the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Project to fund a previously unfunded lighting system component.
 +$100,000 for Boat Ramp replacement.
 +$145,000 for multiple facility improvements, including Carpenter Shop safety upgrades, a secondary fire water connection (fire water tie-in) at the new Recreation Center, and water tower rehabilitation.

Measure S Sales Tax General Fund Revenues and Expenditure Adjustments  +$1,000,00 –Transfer in from the Recreation Center Construction Project account to return funding previously allocated from the Measure S fund in FY 2023 as part of the Recreation Center Phase 2 budget reconciliation upon award of the Roebbelen construction contract.

Funding is available from interest earning in the bonds proceeds project account and is being transferred to the CIP account for use on the Roebbelen contract.  +$127,720 – Increase to the transfer out to the General Fund to reimburse additional FY 2025 costs for seven firefighters previously funded by the SAFER grant.

The projected fund balance in the Measure S Sales Tax fund at the end of FY 2026. after the proposed adjustments, is approximately $1.9 million. Staff is not recommending any additional appropriations from this balance at this time. The remaining balance is anticipated to support 710
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 5 of 8
future road rehabilitation allocations in FY 2027 and debt service for the Fire Station III construction bonds starting in FY 2027 or FY 2028.

Non-General Fund Programs
Special Revenue Funds
 Various revenue and expense line items will be adjusted to reflect updated projections, utilization of available fund balances, General Fund contributions (as noted above), and transfers between funds for program cost reimbursements.

Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
 Various CIP revenues and expenses will be adjusted to reflect updated project funding.

These projects are primarily funded through transfers from the General Fund, as described earlier in this report. Adjustments also include returning previously allocated funding to the General Fund, Measure S Sales Tax Fund, and Measure P TOT Fund due to project completion, return of funding, as well as reducing transfers-in where interest earnings in the bond proceeds project account held by the fiscal agent are sufficient to fund project costs.

Debt Service Funds
 Adjustments include reducing interest revenue as the 2023 bonds project account has been depleted for payments to Roebbelen and increasing transfer out to the Recreation Center Construction Project account using accumulated interest earnings from the bond proceeds project account.

Enterprise Funds
 The majority of the revenue adjustment reflects transfers between funds to correct an incorrect revenue allocation in FY 2025 within the Parking Garage Fund. The increase in expenditures is largely due to the addition of a new full-time Maintenance Technician position at the Airport, supported by excess operating revenues in that fund.

Internal Service Funds
 Adjustments include an increase in transfers in from the General Fund and a decrease in expenditures to account for additional expenditures recognized in FY 2025 related to the health insurance special assessment and corresponding adjustments in FY 2026.

General Fund Five-Year Financial Plan
The Five-Year Financial Plan analyzes major known and projected fiscal conditions to support informed long-term planning and decision-making regarding operational and capital improvement resources. The Plan focuses on the City’s General Fund and provides a forecast of revenues and expenditures for the five-year period from fiscal year 2026-2027 through 2030- 2031.

Key highlights of this Five-Year Financial Plan update include:
 Revenue Forecasting: Revenue projections are based on prior year actuals, current economic trends, and available economic indicators.
o Major City Revenues - Property Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), and Sales Tax, are projected to grow at a modest rate of 1.25% to 3.0%. Property tax revenue grew by 3.2% in FY 2025, and TOT revenue increased 6.4% in FY 2025 compared to the prior year. However, this robust increase is not expected to continue based on current 711
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 6 of 8
economic indicators. TOT revenue remains highly variable and dependent on weather conditions, visitor demand, and broader economic factors. Early FY 2026 trends indicate fewer room nights and variable sales activity, partially due to the Beach Retreat hotel closure, suggesting slower growth in TOT and Sales Tax revenues in the coming year.
o Project Area TOT increased 3.4% in FY 2024 and 10.0% in FY 2025, largely due to the full reopening of the Margaritaville hotel following renovations. Similar to City TOT, this revenue is projected to grow at a modest rate of 1.25% annually over the next several years.
o The plan assumes that at least $2.0 million annually from the Measure S Sales Tax fund in FY 2026 and beyond will be used to support staffing costs for seven firefighters previously funded by the SAFER grant, 50% of the Fire Division Chief/Fire Marshal position, and 100% of one Police Lieutenant position. This amount is expected to increase to approximately $2.3m by FY 2031.
o Parks and Recreation Revenues are projected based on full operations beginning in FY 2027, supported in part by transfers from the Measure P TOT fund. These transfers are expected to help offset the net operating cost of the new Recreation Center and reduce the financial burden on the City’s General Fund. However, this support is contingent on the availability of surplus Measure P TOT revenues and continued positive TOT trends. If these conditions do not occur, Measure P TOT revenues may not be available to support operations, and the City may need to cover the new Recreation Center operating deficit through the General Fund or other available funding sources.
 Expenditures:
o The majority of personnel and operating expenditures are projected to increase between 2% and 3% annually.
o Personnel expenditures reflect the impact of the fully implemented Classification & Compensation Study.
o Projected personnel costs incorporate the addition of two new Police Officer positions for the Boat Patrol Program.
o Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) cost projections are based on a 9.3% CalPERS investment return for the fiscal year ended June 30th, 2024. o The forecast assumes an annual prepayment of CalPERS UAL in July, which results in saving of over $100K annually.
o All one-time large capital expenditures have been removed from the projections. o No significant funding is included for major capital expenditures such as road rehabilitation or vehicle replacement. However, the projections include $500K annually for deferred maintenance over the next five years and limited funding for the road rehabilitation program in the next two years. The majority of road rehabilitation funding is expected to come from the Measure S Sales Tax Fund.

As of September 30, 2025, the City’s undesignated excess reserves totaled $6.6 million, excluding the required 25% reserve of $16.3 million for FY 2026 and the $2.0 million set-aside for anticipated future deficits (approved by City Council with the FY 2024 budget adoption). The FY 2026 amended budget uses $1.1 million of these reserves, reducing the available balance to $5.5 million prior to the proposed mid-year adjustments. Due to ongoing annual expenditure increases, an additional $680,000 will need to be added to the required 25% reserve for FY 2027. After the proposed mid-year adjustments of $4.1 million, the large majority of which are 712
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 7 of 8
for one-time expenditures, the City is projected to end FY 2026 with approximately $800K in undesignated excess reserves.

The table below presents a summary of the 2027-2031 General Fund Five-Year Financial Plan.

Preliminary estimates for FY 2027, which incorporate the assumptions previously listed in the Key Highlights section above, indicate that the General Fund is projected to have a small deficit in the upcoming fiscal year. Higher than anticipated revenue growth in FY 2025 largely eliminated the significant annual deficit that had previously been projected. Additionally, projected deficits in future years are eliminated through the supplementation of Measure P TOT funding for the new Recreation Center, totaling $500K annually. Without supplementation from this and other funds, the General Fund deficit over the next several years would have been approximately $700K.

Although revenues are expected to grow modestly, economic and political uncertainty may limit future revenue growth. As a result, the City will need to carefully monitor expenditures over the next several years, as projected deficits may increase and are anticipated to exceed $1 million in FY 2031. The $2.0 million previously set aside for anticipated future deficits is recommended to be retained for FY 2027 budget process. If these funds are not needed, they may be allocated to road rehabilitation or other pressing City needs in the adopted budget.

The Finance Department will begin the next fiscal year’s budget process in April 2026.

Measure S Sales Tax General Fund Five-Year Projections
Measure S sales tax is projected to generate $8.9 million on average annually for the next five years. The preliminary projected uses for FY 2027 include:
 $2.0 million for Fire Station II Staffing, 50% of the Fire Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal position, and 100% of the Police Lieutenant position.
 $137,000 for city-wide sidewalk snow removal.
 $5.1 million for road rehabilitation, cape seal, and expanded in-house street maintenance and snow removal programs.
 $0.4 million for snow removal equipment debt service payments and extended warranty payments for the new communications system.
 $2.2 million is projected to be allocated for Fire Station III construction bond financing debt service in FY 2027 and in at least each of the subsequent five years.

Attachment 05 provides a detailed analysis of the primary General Fund revenues by type and expenditures by department, as well as Measure S Sales Tax general fund revenues and financing uses through FY 2031.

Actual Actual
Budget before
M-Y
Budget after
M-Y Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 Rev. $62,404,855 $66,002,167 $67,210,442 $68,771,916 $67,933,786 $69,025,218 $70,196,911 $71,735,930 $73,108,295 Exp. $61,975,811 $67,799,012 $68,313,793 $73,937,660 $68,004,250 $69,032,028 $70,575,653 $72,680,288 $74,525,371 Fund Balance
Increase / (Usage) $429,044 ($1,796,845) ($1,103,351) ($5,165,744) ($70,464) ($6,810) ($378,742) ($944,358) ($1,417,076) General Fund Five-Year Plan Summary 2027 to 2031
713
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 8 of 8
Financial Implications: The General Fund budget currently utilizes $1.1 million of the available $6.6 million in undesignated excess reserves for one-time expenditures. The recommended midyear net budget appropriations of $4,062,393 will reduce the available undesignated reserves balance to approximately $1.5 million. The increase in the 25% mandatory reserve requirement will utilize an estimated additional $0.7 million, leaving a projected balance of approximately $0.8 million in excess reserves (differences are due to rounding).

Completion of the FY 2026 mid-year budget process will ensure continued operations through the end of the fiscal year and enable City staff to continue implementing the City Council’s priorities.

In addition to the mid-year budget appropriations, the accompanying resolution amends the City’s Allocated Position Listing by adding two new full-time equivalent (FTE) positions and approving salary schedules for one reclassified position. The fiscal impact of these actions is reflected in the proposed budget adjustments and the Five-Year plan.

The General Fund Five-Year Financial Plan update provides an analysis of the economic factors affecting the City’s revenue base, the specific revenue sources available to the City, and the projected obligation known at the time of the plan update. Multi-year financial planning is required under the City’s Financial Policies (Financial Planning) and serves as an essential tool for developing budget guidelines and evaluating the long-term fiscal impact of current-year decisions.

Environmental Considerations: This is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(2) (continuing administrative or maintenance activities, such as purchases for supplies) Policy Implications: Compliance with City Financial Policies: Budget Management, Section E and Financial Planning, Section B.
714
Resolution 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 3
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 24, 2026
Approving FY 2025-2026 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments and
Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing
for Changes Made During Mid-Year

BACKGROUND
A. The Mid-year budget review is recommended as part of the City’s Financial Policies – Budget Management.

B. The City Council Priorities 2025-2030 include priorities and goals, some of which are included in the fiscal year 2025-2026 mid-year budget adjustments.

C. The City Council wishes to amend the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year Total Budget for funding of continued operations and one-time costs through the end of the fiscal year.

D. There are staffing level changes approved which will amend the allocated position listing as described below (mid-year amendments reflect partial year). a. Establish one (1) full-time Communications Manager position. b. Eliminate one (1) full-time Communications and Project Specialist position. c. Establish one (1) full-time Financial Services Manager position. d. Eliminate one (1) full-time Financial Services Supervisor position. e. Establish one (1) full-time Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V position (Airport). f. Rename Associate Civil Engineer/Sr. Civil Engineer to Associate Engineer/Sr.

Engineer (no change in total FTE).

E. The Interim City Manager and Director of Finance recommend the budget adjustments summarized on the next page.
715
Resolution 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 3
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Adopts the 2025-2026 Fiscal year budget for the recommended adjustments listed above.

2. Adopts changes to the attached allocated position listing and the new salary table, attached hereto as Exhibits “A” and “B,” respectively.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 24, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:

Revenue Expense Net Change
Increase/(Decrease) (Increase)/Decrease Revenue/(Expense) General Fund:
100 General Fund * $ 1,561,474 $ (5,623,867) $ (4,062,393) 102 General Fund - Measure S Sales Tax 1,000,000 (127,720) 872,280 Total General Fund $ 2,561,474 $ (5,751,587) $ (3,190,113) Other Funds:
201 Gas Tax * $ - $ (30,673) $ (30,673)
207 Snow Removal * - (7,969) (7,969)
210 Vehicle Replacement 142,470 (142,470) -
211 Police Vehicle Replacement * (60,000) (85,000) (145,000) 218 VHR Program * - (256,485) (256,485)
220 Measure P TOT - 1,103,237 1,103,237
221 Ice Arena 50,000 - 50,000
231 AB 3229 COPS 120,000 (120,000) -
232 Safety Sales Tax (Prop 172) - 60,000 60,000
237 Boat Patrol - Grant 204,470 (204,470) -
240 AB 939 * 76,135 (86,135) (10,000)
243 Nuisance Abatement * - (1,483) (1,483)
244 Solid Waste 25,000 - 25,000
245 Stormwater Management Program * - (30,000) (30,000) 284 Measure S City Maintenance 3,000 - 3,000
290 Opioid Abatement Program * - (2,500) (2,500)
301 City CIP * 5,497,164 (5,530,943) (33,779)
310 Long Term Capital 145,000 (145,000) -
401 City Debt Service * (1,974,000) (3,000,000) (4,974,000) 501 Airport Enterprise Fund * 51,233 (66,548) (15,315)
510 Parking Bellamy Court * (40,000) (153,000) (193,000) 520 Parking Garage 173,000 (15,000) 158,000
550 Transit Operations * - (10,000) (10,000)
601 Health Insurance 380,000 792,862 1,172,862
Total Other Funds $ 4,793,472 $ (7,931,577) $ (3,138,105) Total All Funds $ 7,354,946 $ (13,683,164) $ (6,328,218) * Fund Balance Available
716
Resolution 2026-XXX March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 3
______________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
717
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 24/25 Adopted thru June'25 25/26 Adopted thru Mar'26 25/26 Budget

CITY COUNCIL
Council Member (Elected) Department Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00

CITY CLERK
City Clerk (Elected) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

CITY TREASURER
City Treasurer (Elected) Department Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications and Project Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Communications Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
Data and Innovation Program Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sustainability Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Transportation Manager 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00

5.00 5.25 5.00 5.00
Human Resources
Human Resources Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Principal &/or H.R. Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Airport
Airport Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.50 0.00
Department Total 12.00 12.25 12.00 12.50 0.00

CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Risk Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Paralegal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant I, II 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Total 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Financial Services
Financial Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
Financial Services Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
Accountant I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I / Payroll Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant (Transit JPA) 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00
Principal Management Analyst - Purchasing and Grants 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 4.00 4.25 4.00 4.00 0.00
Revenue
Accounting Technician I, II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Supervising Accounting Technician 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Assistant Management Analyst 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
1 of 3
718
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 24/25 Adopted thru June'25 25/26 Adopted thru Mar'26 25/26 Budget FINANCE DEPARTMENT (continues)
Information Systems
Information Systems Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Information Systems Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Systems Administrator 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
IT Analyst / Sr. IT Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Information Systems Technician I, II 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Total 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
Department Total 12.00 12.25 14.00 14.00 0.00

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Director of Development Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Clerk I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Planning
Planning Manager/Environmental Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Planner, Assistant Planner 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sr. Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Development Services Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00
Housing
Housing Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Planner, Assistant Planner- Housing 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
Building and Safety
Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pr Bldg & Sr Bldg Inspector, Bldg Inspector, Hsng Insp. 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 Sr. Permit Center Technician, Permit Center Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Total 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 0.00
Department Total 17.00 17.00 16.00 16.00 1.00

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Capital Program and Facilities Program Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Engineering
Complete Streets Program Manager 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Associate Civil Engineer, Associate Architect 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 Associate Civil Engineer, Sr. Civil Engineer 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 Associate Engineer, Sr. Engineer 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
Associate Planner, Assistant Planner (Transportation) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician I, II 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00
Engineering Project Manager 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Total 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.00 0.00
Maintenance Operations / Snow Removal
Maintenance Manager 2.17 2.17 2.00 2.00
Lead Maintenance Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Total 20.17 20.17 20.00 20.00 0.00
Fleet Maintenance
Maintenance Manager - Fleet 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Equipment Mechanic I, II, III 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Fleet Control Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00
Department Total 37.17 37.67 38.00 38.00 0.00
2 of 3
719
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 24/25 Adopted thru June'25 25/26 Adopted thru Mar'26 25/26 Budget

PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Director of Parks and Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation
Administrative Assistant I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Manager - Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technicians I, II, III, IV,V 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 Recreation Supervisor - Acquatics 0.00 0.42 1.00 1.00
Recreation Supervisor - Programs 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Events Coordinator 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Marketing and Events Coordinator 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Recreation Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Head Pool Lifeguard 1.00 1.42 2.00 2.00
Total 6.00 6.84 11.00 11.00
Parks
Maintenance Manager - Parks 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Maintenance Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technicians I, II, III, IV,V 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Total 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Department Total 16.00 16.84 21.00 21.00 0.00

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Division Chief (Grant Funded) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Deputy Chief 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Marshall 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fire Captain 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Fire Engineer 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Firefighter, Paramedic 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Firefighter, Paramedic (Meas. S, prev. SAFER Grant) 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Fire Safety Inspector I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant to the Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Department Total 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 0.00

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief of Police 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Police Sergeant 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Police Officer 31.00 31.10 31.00 32.00
Police Officer (cannabis) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Safety Dispatch Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Records Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Service Officer Supervisor 1.00 1.33 2.00 2.00 Public Safety Dispatcher 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Senior Police Records Tech, Police Record Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Evidence/Prop Tech, Evidence/Prop Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sr Community Svcs Officer, Community Svcs Officer 4.00 5.67 8.00 8.00 Parking Ambassador 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Code Compliance Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 69.00 71.10 74.00 75.00 0.00
Total City Employees 217.17 221.11 229.00 230.50 1.00
3 of 3
720
1435 COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
Index Key Value Hourly Monthly
1401/1451/01 47.91946 8,306
1401/1451/02 50.31544 8,721
1401/1451/03 52.83120 9,157
1401/1451/04 55.47276 9,615
1401/1451/05 58.24640 10,096
City of South Lake Tahoe
Salary Table Updates
Effective 3/28/2026
Approved by City Council 3/24/2026
1 of 1 721
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE GENERAL FUND FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN Fiscal Years 2027 to 2031 Actual Actual Budget Budget MY Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast REVENUES BY TYPE 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 Prop Tax 11,384,911 11,752,391 12,322,000 12,680,000 13,060,400 13,452,212 13,855,778 14,271,452 14,699,595 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 10,641,698 11,327,309 11,787,563 11,847,563 12,390,514 12,638,325 12,796,304 12,956,257 13,118,211 Sales Tax 7,101,512 7,581,798 7,737,140 7,737,140 7,951,284 8,050,675 8,151,308 8,253,200 8,356,365 Transfers IN 3,203,557 2,693,268 4,584,261 5,662,429 3,988,869 3,925,341 3,966,265 3,945,120 4,027,137 Vehicle License Fee 2,969,117 3,141,507 3,133,000 3,271,000 3,369,130 3,470,204 3,574,310 3,681,539 3,791,985 Measure Q 3,972,886 4,147,122 4,191,000 4,191,000 4,307,000 4,360,838 4,415,348 4,470,540 4,526,422 Parks & Recreation Revenue 1,059,366 993,826 1,666,097 1,651,097 2,066,097 2,128,080 2,191,922 2,257,680 2,325,410 Project Area TOT 7,513,043 8,264,006 7,900,000 8,000,000 8,240,000 8,404,800 8,509,860 8,616,233 8,723,936 Other Revenue 3,473,825 5,376,067 3,029,517 3,110,823 2,529,517 2,329,517 2,229,517 2,529,517 2,529,517 Police Revenue 2,698,593 2,551,756 2,749,364 2,494,364 2,569,195 2,646,271 2,725,659 2,807,429 2,891,652 Franchise Fees 2,214,663 2,231,402 2,360,000 2,376,000 2,447,280 2,520,698 2,596,319 2,674,209 2,754,435 Business License Tax 2,373,475 2,428,266 2,358,930 2,358,930 2,429,698 2,502,589 2,577,667 2,654,996 2,734,646 Public Services Revenue 3,167,262 2,666,821 2,286,450 2,286,450 2,291,450 2,296,450 2,301,450 2,306,450 2,311,450 Fire Revenue 630,949 846,628 1,105,120 1,105,120 293,352 299,219 305,203 311,307 317,534 Total Revenues 62,404,855$ 66,002,167$ 67,210,442$ 68,771,916$ 67,933,786$ 69,025,218$ 70,196,911$ 71,735,930$ 73,108,295$ EXPENDITURES BY DEPT s s
Police 14,508,708$ 17,557,103$ 16,379,626$ 16,825,025$ 16,728,021$ 17,277,009$ 17,620,502$ 17,962,397$ 18,355,111$ Fire 11,044,043 11,779,840 13,163,571 13,236,560 12,725,033 13,138,780 13,395,831 13,652,309 13,948,009 General Fund Transfers OUT 7,844,510 7,955,560 4,523,112 9,020,466 3,517,940 3,767,887 3,316,011 3,500,364 3,555,996 General Fund Transfer OUT - Debt Service 3,537,610 3,225,375 3,387,775 3,713,775 2,556,754 945,478 997,735 953,047 915,663 Parks and Recreation 4,435,057 5,248,958 6,525,685 6,756,161 7,389,622 8,071,097 8,778,786 9,504,090 10,247,463 General Government 5,167,964 6,189,271 7,275,821 7,413,878 7,575,169 7,731,227 7,931,799 8,137,760 8,349,260 Finance 3,020,976 3,471,520 3,627,604 3,774,260 3,861,216 3,942,455 4,039,994 4,140,046 4,242,676 Miscellaneous General Fund 5,456,227 5,305,552 4,915,305 4,814,241 4,940,290 5,265,074 5,384,041 5,495,833 5,347,550 Development Services 1,963,179 1,876,796 2,100,261 2,100,261 2,147,762 2,192,640 2,243,550 2,295,690 2,349,090 Public Works/Engineering 4,997,536 5,189,037 6,415,033 6,283,033 6,562,444 6,700,381 6,867,402 7,038,754 7,214,553 Total Expenses $ 61,975,811 $ 67,799,012 $ 68,313,793 $ 73,937,660 $ 68,004,250 $ 69,032,028 $ 70,575,653 $ 72,680,288 $ 74,525,371 Increase to / (Use of) Fund Balance 429,044$ (1,796,845)$ (1,103,351)$ (5,165,744)$ (70,464)$ (6,810)$ (378,742)$ (944,358)$ (1,417,076)$ 722

MEASURE S SALES TAX GENERAL FUND FIVE
-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN Fiscal Years 202
7 to 20
3 1 Actual Actual Budget w/M-Y Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast REVENUES 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 Measure S Sales Tax 7,933,783 8,294,649 8,382,000 8,614,000 8,721,675 8,830,696 8,941,080 9,052,843 Interest Revenue 46,023 56,884 46,000 40,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 10,000 Transfer - in 9,506 - 1,000,000 - - - - -
REVENUES TOTAL 7,989,312$ 8,351,533$ 9,428,000$ 8,654,000$ 8,751,675$ 8,870,696$ 8,981,080$ 9,062,843$ EXPENDITURES / FINANCING USESTechnical Services 6,413 600 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Transfer out for:

PAYGO - Communications System - - - 47,410 47,410 47,410 47,410 47,410 Financing - Communications System 554,643 554,643 - - - - - - Financing - Snow Removal Equipment 602,721 602,721 778,934 352,425 352,425 352,425 352,425 176,213 Financing - Fire Station 3 bonds - - - 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 Fire Station III Rehabilitation 800,000 500,000 - - - - - - Fire Station II Staffing 1,326,619 1,200,078 1,315,720 1,420,978 1,477,817 1,536,929 1,598,407 1,662,343 BC/Fire Marshall (vehicle, 50% funded position) 120,107 144,000 198,500 206,440 214,698 223,286 232,217 241,506 Police Lieutenant (100% funded) 309,124 303,208 326,050 339,092 352,656 366,762 366,762 366,762 Police Officer (partial year, if grant not renewed) - - - - - - - - Police Safety Equipment - - - - - - - - Stormwater Management Program and Project 136,054 99,352 - - - - - - South Shore Fuel Reduction Program 37,844 - - - - - - - Road Reconstruction & StormWater Projects 3,380,000 4,097,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Sidewalk snow removal 126,000 161,234 132,635 136,614 140,712 144,934 149,282 153,760 Recreation Center Construction - - - - - - - -
Streets Maintenance (in-house) - 630,000 1,023,798 900,000 800,000 700,000 700,000 800,000 Snow Removal (enhanced ops public streets) - 500,000 700,000 700,000 600,000 450,000 450,000 500,000 Vehicle Replacement 481,379 350,000 - - - - - -
Snow Removal Equipment Replacement 1,197,000 - - - - - - EXPENDITURES TOTAL 9,077,904$ 9,142,836$ 7,985,637$ 9,807,959$ 9,190,717$ 9,026,746$ 9,101,502$ 9,152,994$ INCREASE TO / (USE OF) FUND BALANCE (1,088,592)$ (791,303)$ 1,442,363$ (1,153,959)$ (439,042)$ (156,050)$ (120,423)$ (90,151)$ MEASURE S YEAR-END FUND BALANCE 1,258,040$ 466,738$ 1,909,101$ 755,142$ 316,100$ 160,050$ 39,627$ (50,523)$ 723
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ASSUMPTIONS 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 Property Tax 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%T.O.T./Project Area T.O.T 2.00% 2.00% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25%Sales Tax/Measure Q/Measure S 2.80% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25%Vehicle License Fee 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Franchise Fees 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Transfer-in from Measure S - funding for Fire and Police staffing (7 FFs,
50% of Fire Marshall/BC, 100% of Police Lt.) and Sidewalk Snow Removal
$2.0 million $2.1 million $2.2 million $2.2 million $2.3 million Transfer-in from Measure P for the
new Recreation Center Operations - $0.25 million - $0.25 million - 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031
Salaries 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%Health 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Pension 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%Pension (UAL) per CalPERS actuarial estimates; assumes prepayment $9,495,059 $10,281,718 $10,406,538 $10,506,201 $10,375,575 Road Repairs $250K $1.15 million $200K none none Transfers-out for other CIP Projects none none none none none Transfers-out for deferred maintenance $200K $280K $200K $200K $200K
Transfer-out to Vehicle and
Equipment Replacement none none none none none
Other Personnel Expenditures 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Other Operating Expenditures 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Contractual Services 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Capital Outlay 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

MAJOR REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS

MAJOR EXPENDITURE ASSUMPTIONS
724

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

GENERAL FUND - UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE ACTIVITY
THROUGH 3/10/2026
Beginning Fund Balance @ 10/01/2025 $ 34,042,091
Less: Unspendable amounts at the beginning of the fiscal year Non-Spendable (advances, encumbrances, prepaids, inventories, committed) (7,649,328) Restricted - General Liability Claims (500,000)
25% Reserve (16,267,568)
Set-aside for projected budget deficit per Resolution 2023-077 (2,000,000) Set-aside for Affordable Housing Project (Loan to Novin) per community survey (1,000,000) Available for 2025-2026 Expenditures 6,625,196$
Activity during FY 2025-2026:

Carryforward Encumbrances, net, ccm 10.21.25 (969,466)
GF grant funding roll forward true-up (98,884)
Various budget appropriations, ccm 01.13.26 (35,000)
Net Usage Subtotal (1,103,350)
Remaining Available Fund Balance @ 03/10/2026 5,521,846 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments, ccm 3.24.2026 ($4,062,393) Remaining Available Fund Balance @ 03/24/2026 $1,459,453 Less: Increase to 25% Reserve for FY 2027 - 25% of $67.8m (FY27 budget per Mar'26 5yr plan) ($683,494) Projected Ending Fund Balance @09/30/2026 $775,959
725
STRATEGIC PLAN 2025-2030

TIMELINE
Strategic Priority & Action Item Lead 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 Status

1. Ability for everyone who works here to live here.

1.1 Pro-actively work with current affordable housing developers and partner agencies to implement the Sugar Pine Village project. DevServ On schedule - seeking funding

1.2 Pro-actively work with an affordable housing developer and partner agencies to develop affordable and/or workforce housing at 3900 Lake Tahoe Blvd. DevServ On schedule - seeking funding

1.3 Continue to collaborate with Saint Joseph Community Land Trust and other organizations to increase capacity to address housing needs. DevServ Ongoing

1.4 Work with our business community to identify housing opportunities. DevServ

1.5 Seek AG opinion on TRPA land use authority through state legislature. CAO

1.6 Add “Rooted Renters" to "Lease to Locals" program. DevServ

1.7 Increase funding for "Lease to Locals" program. DevServ

1.8 Evaluate ability to reduce regulations for development and streamline approval process. DevServ, CMO
Implementing Concierge Service
and educational outreach early

1.9 Evaluate the feasibility of a citywide residential plan. DevServ

1.10 Continue to work with the Tahoe Coalition for the Homeless to rehabilitate properties purchased through Project HomeKey. DevServ CDBG grant closed out - CC
3/10/26

1.11 Identify and secure funding to develop a multi-family residential rehabilitation program. DevServ, CMO

2. Efficient Government

2.1 Clarify roles and expectations of commissions. Clerk, CMO CC discussed 1/13/26 - no changes

2.2 Perform a Worker Safety Rsk Analysis. CAO

2.3 Complete geothermal feasibility study. PW

2.4 Consider development of a legislative agenda in coordination with Cal Citiies. CMO, CAO

2.5 Determine next steps for City's annexation initiatives. CMO, CAO LAFCO approved cleanup 3/26/25.

CC discussed Hevenly 11/4/26 -
annexation tabled until CC makes
request

2.6 Evaluate impact of regulatory system at local, regional, and state levels. CMO, CAO

2.7 Allow the deployment of new technology that is scientifically safe. DevServ Ongoing

2.8 Evaluate appropriate systems and tools for processes and communication that are cyber-safe (i.e. website, AI framework, scheduling system). CMO, Finance
Ongoing. Website updated. AI
policy approved by CC 2/10/26 1
726
STRATEGIC PLAN 2025-2030

TIMELINE
Strategic Priority & Action Item Lead 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 Status

3. Ensure public safety

3.1 Evaluate bait theft prevention systems. Police

3.2 Seek grants and support legislative policy for Wildland Urban Interface, defensible space, and home hardening funding. Fire On schedule

3.3 Advocate with our legislature to get more funds for fire prevention and fuel reduction for the United States Forest Service (USFS) and California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC). CMO, Fire On schedule

3.4 Continue to modernize our wildfire preparedness and emergency evacuation plan in coordination with neighboring jurisdictions. Fire Ongoing

4. Grow and diversify the economy.

4.1 Identify viable second economies. CMO On schedule

4.2 Create Economic Development Advisory Committee to focus on local business retention and expansion programs as well as other potential economic development initiatives. CMO On schedule

4.3 Strive to develop 51 events per year in coordination with partners. Parks&Rec On schedule

4.4 Support Lake Tahoe Community Colleges (LTCC) to identify appropriate workforce development programs (i.e. nursing school, paramedic school, etc.) CMO

4.5 Evaluate cannabis tax and mitigation fee structure. CMO, Finance CC reduced tax and eliminated
public safety fee 11/4/25

4.6 Complete an update to the City's Economic Development element of the General Plan. CMO

4.7 Complete the Mid-Town Plan update. DevServ On schedule

5. Improve Transportation

5.1 Improve scooter safety for users and non-users. Police CC discussion 3/10/26 - on
schedule

5.2 Complete the conceptual US50 Corridor Planning study including transit options and cross-jurisdictional coordination (including gondola, widened bike lanes, speed reduction, Y mobility hub). PW On schedule

5.3 Complete traffic calming toolbox (including multi-modal traffic control device warrants). PW On schedule

5.4 Continue to support Transit JPA - increase funding for LakeLink microtransit. CMO 3 year agreement approved 1/27/26

5.5 Increase annual road repair through innovative maintenance and rehab program.

PW, CMO,
Finance
$6 million allocated to road rehab
and maintenance in FY 25/26 -
Ongoing
2 727
STRATEGIC PLAN 2025-2030

TIMELINE
Strategic Priority & Action Item Lead 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 Status

5.6 Prioritize the implementation of Complete Streets. PW Stateline Complete Street - On
schedule

5.7 Evaluation of city-wide parking management strategies including potential expansion of paid parking and reduction of parking requirements.

PW, CMO,
Police

6. Protect the natural enviornment

6.1 Update Storm Water and Drainage Master Plan. PW

6.2 Identify areas that are suitable to serve as drainage basins. PW

6.3 Ensure all storm water projects are in compliance with sediment total maximum daily load (TMDL) standards and always improve lake clarity. PW On schedule

6.4 Support CivicSpark Fellow position. CMO
FY 25/26 CivicSpark Fellow
approved and started 2/26. FY
26/27 application submitted

6.5 Evaluate the feasibility and cost implications of creating or joining a community choice aggregation option and municipal owned utility to reduce carbon emissions and improve grid reliability. CMO, CAO On schedule

7. Recreation and equitable access for all

7.1 Complete the new Recreation and Swim Complex and maintain the current complex in the meantime. PW, Parks&Rec On schedule

7.2 Implement the Vision Zero Plan. PW, Police On schedule

7.3 Increase connectivity and safety. PW, Police On schedule

7.4 Evaluate public pier options.

CMO,
Parks&Rec

7.5 Evaluate the possibility of building and maintaining a park in every neighborhood (pocket parks). Parks&Rec On schedule

7.6 Partner for Senior Services. Parks&Rec On schedule

7.7 Continue to improve access for people of all abilities to all public spaces. Parks&Rec, PW Ongoing
Project Start
Project Complete
Evaluate for Potential Operationalization
Completed
3 728
Public Works – FY 25/26
Remaining Workplan
Category Name Planning Design Construction
CIP
El Dorado Beach Revetment Y Y Y
Fire Station 3 New Building Y
Motel 6 Bike Bridge Scour Repair Y Y
New Parks Shop Y
Police Department
Roof Replacement Y
Facilities &
Buildings
1740 D Street - Final Y
ADA Upgrades City Wide Y
Backup Power Replacement Y
Bijou Bike Park Y
Cemetery Security Upgrades Y
Community Playfield Restrooms Y
Contract Services Y
Fire Station 1 Rehab Y
Fire Station 2 Rehab Y
General Facilities Sustainability Y
Lake View & Ski Run Electrical Y
Long Term Capital Replacement Y Y Y
Miscellaneous Maintenance Y
Multi-Generational Recreation Center Y
Regan Beach Rehabilitation Y
Services Center Rehab Y
Street Light Infrastructure Y
Technical Services Y
729
Public Works – FY 25/26
Remaining Workplan
Category Name Planning Design Construction
Other
Citywide Sustainability and Energy
Upgrade Project Y Y
EV Charging Stations - Microtransit
Electric Vans Y
Grant Application Consulting Services Y
Public Works and Snow Equipment
Vehicles Replacement

N/A N/A N/A
Roads
Annual Sealing Project (Cape Seal) Y
Annual Streets and Roads Paving and
Rehabilitation Y
Bijou Park Connector Project Y
Dennis Machida Memorial Bike Way
Phase 1C Y
Eloise Ave Road Rehab Y
Pioneer Trail Improvements - Phase II Y
Stateline Avenue Complete Streets
Project Y
Sugar Pine Multi-Use Trails - AHSC
Grant Y
Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Lighting
Improvements Y
Traffic Calming Toolbox Y
US 50 Corridor Study Y
US 50/89 Road Safety Audit
Implementation Y
Stormwater
& Env. Imp.

Bijou Park Creek - Upper Watershed Y Y Y
Drainage Improvements - Micro Areas
- City Wide Y
Drainage Master Plan Update Y
Drainage Pipe Replacement Y
James & Eloise
Drainage Pipe Replacement Y
Tahoe Valley Stormwater and
Greenbelt Improvement Project Y
730
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:13
Agenda Item: Continued Discussion of Comprehensive User Fee Study Report and Policy Direction on Cost Recovery
Executive Summary: On March 10, 2026, the City Council received a presentation of the Draft Comprehensive User Fee Study prepared by Government Consulting Partners (GCP). The purpose of the presentation was to review the study findings and obtain policy direction regarding cost recovery targets and potential fee adjustments. During the discussion, several Councilmembers expressed concerns regarding potential fee increases and requested additional information regarding the City's financial condition prior to providing direction. The item was continued pending presentation of the FY 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan update. This item returns to City Council to provide additional clarification regarding the proposed fee adjustments, including examples of fees that would increase or decrease, existing discounts for youth, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, and the proposed technology fee adjustment. Staff is requesting policy direction from City Council regarding cost recovery goals and the implementation approach for any recommended fee adjustments.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion providing direction regarding User Fees Study and Target Cost Recovery Levels on: (1) the level of cost recovery level desired for fee-supported services (full cost recovery vs. continued subsidy); (2) selection of an appeal fee structure; (3) reconfirming the City's approach to EMS under-recovery; and (4) continued General Fund subsidy levels for recreation and other community-benefit programs.

Responsible Staff Member: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff_Report-User_Fee_Study_Continued_Discussion.docx 02-GCP User Fee Study Feb 2026 rv.pdf
731
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 7
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: Continued Discussion of Comprehensive User Fee Study and Policy Direction on Cost Recovery
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Background: On March 10, 2026, the City Council received a presentation of the Draft Comprehensive User Fee Study prepared by Government Consulting Partners (GCP). The purpose of the item was to present the findings of the study and request policy direction regarding cost recovery targets, subsidy levels for certain services, and the potential implementation of updated user fees.

User fees are one of the primary tools used by local governments to ensure that individuals or organizations requesting specific services pay an appropriate share of the cost of providing those services, rather than shifting those costs broadly to taxpayers through the General Fund.

The City last completed a comprehensive cost-of-service review in 2015. Since that time, Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments have been implemented where appropriate; however, the City had not conducted a full recalculation of service costs using current staffing levels, overhead, and operational data.

The City retained Government Consulting Partners (GCP) in April 2025 to conduct a comprehensive review of user fees across all departments. The study evaluated:
• Direct staff time required to deliver services
• Fully burdened hourly rates (including benefits and overhead) • Operating and administrative support costs
• Current cost recovery levels
• Regional fee comparisons
• Recommended structural and policy changes
During the March 10 meeting, City Council discussed several policy considerations related to the proposed fee adjustments.

Several Councilmembers expressed concerns regarding potential increases to user fees and the potential economic impact on residents, homeowners, and businesses. Councilmembers noted that the cost of living and the cost of doing business are already increasing and emphasized the importance of maintaining affordability within the community.

Councilmembers also expressed support for maintaining subsidized access to certain community programs and services, particularly those benefiting youth, seniors, and individuals with disabilities.

Additional suggestions included exploring reduced fees for local residents and certain affordable housing development projects.
732
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 7
Councilmembers also raised questions regarding specific fee adjustments included in the study, including the proposed increase to the appeal fee and how fees should balance access to the appeals process with discouraging frivolous appeals.

During the discussion, Councilmembers also requested additional information regarding the City’s financial condition before providing policy direction on potential fee adjustments. The item was subsequently continued pending presentation of the Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan Update.

This item returns to Council to continue the discussion and request policy direction regarding the proposed use fee updates.

Financial Context
The FY 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan Update that Council received during March 24 meeting provided additional context for the City’s long-term financial outlook. The City’s current fiscal condition is relatively stable, as higher-than-anticipated revenues in FY 2025 significantly reduced the larger structural deficit that had previously been projected. However, the updated Five-Year Financial Plan indicates that small structural deficits are projected to begin in FY 2027 and may increase in later years if expenditure growth outpaces revenue growth. As part of the FY 2026 mid-year budget process, staff proposed to utilize a portion of undesignated excess reserves to fund one-time capital and operational needs. Following the proposed adjustments the City is projected to end FY 2026 with approximately $800,000 in undesignated excess reserves.

While the City remains financial stable, long-term fiscal planning requires careful consideration of both revenues and expenditures to maintain sustainable service levels and fund critical infrastructure needs. User fee policies are one component of these broader financial planning considerations.

Issue and Discussion:

Discounted fees and fee waivers for youth, seniors, people with disabilities, and non-profits During the March 10 discussion, Councilmembers express interest in ensuring that fees remain affordable for youth, seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Staff would like to clarify that discounted fees already exist within several City programs, particularly within the Parks and Recreation and Recreation Center fee structures. The following groups’ fees have special discounted levels, as adopted by City Council during November 5, 2025, meeting:

1. Youth pricing for recreation programs and aquatic center access.

2. Reduced rates for seniors for recreation programs and facility use.

3. Discounted annual passes for individuals with disabilities at the Recreation and Aquatics Center.

4. Resident versus non-resident pricing for certain recreation programs and facility rentals. (Continues next page)
733
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 7
Examples include:

Meeting Room
Rentals
Community
Room Rentals
Facility Day Use Facility Multi-Use
Passes
Recognized
Local Youth
Sport
Organizations
N/A No Charge
Youth
Organization
Meetings
N/A $15/hour
Non-Profit
Organizations
25% off Base
Rate
25% off Base
Rate
Senior Services
Meetings
No Charge No Charge
Standard Rate $25/hour $55/hour
Youth: 18 Years
and Under
$8
Medi-Cal, WIC,
Veteran – Adult
3 Medi-Cal, WIC,
Veteran – Youth
$2
Standard Adult $10
Youth Annual
Pass
$300
Youth Annual
Pass for GPA of

3.5 or higher
$150
Senior Annual
Pass
$300
Standard
Individual Annual
Pass
$480
Additional similar special and discounted rates are provided for youth, seniors, people with disabilities, and non-profits for golf course, swimming programs, Recreation facility multi-use day passes, dance/fitness room rental, and/or adult programs. These pricing structures are designed to maintain accessibility while recovering a portion of program costs.

On November 4, 2025 the City Council reviewed the Parks & Recreation User Fee Study and adopted the recommended fees for the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center.

The User Fee Study also assumes that Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response services will continue to be partially subsidized due to their community benefit. As previously directed and confirmed by the City Council, the Fire Chief’s office has discretionary authorization to waive fees under certain criteria, including patients on Medicare, Medicaid, and Medi-Cal, patients demonstrating a financial burden such as those on fixed income, or patients who petition for a fee waiver for other exigent circumstances.
734
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 4 of 7
Permit Fees for Affordable Housing Projects
During the Council discussion, some Councilmembers suggested reducing or waiving developmentrelated permit fees for projects that provide deed-restricted or affordable housing.

Staff noted that development review fees, such as planning, building, and engineering permit fees, are regulatory cost-recovery fees. Under California law, these fees must be reasonably related to the cost of providing the service and generally cannot vary based on the type of applicant or project.

Because staff time required for activities such as plan review, inspections, and coordination is typically similar regardless of the project type, reducing or waiving these fees for affordable housing projects would not reduce the City’s cost of providing the service.

Staff explained that if the City chooses to provide financial assistance to affordable housing projects, a more appropriate and potentially even a beneficial approach may be to address this through separate policy tools, such as:
• Development Agreements
• Housing incentives or subsidies approved by the City Council • Direct financial contributions or reimbursements from housing or other funding sources Under this approach, the City would continue to charge the standard regulatory fees required to recover the cost of service, while the City Council could choose to provide financial assistance through a Development Agreement or other policy mechanism if it determines that supporting a particular project serves a broader community benefit.

Staff noted that this structure helps maintain compliance with State law governing regulatory fees while still allowing the City to support affordable housing projects through separate policy decisions.

In some instances, city assistance provided directly to a project through these mechanisms allows the project to be more competitive for state and federal grants and financing programs.

Appeal Fee Discussion and Policy Considerations
Councilmembers also discussed the proposed increase to the appeal fee for administrative and quasi-judicial decisions. The study recommends increasing the appeal fee from $380 to $1,253.

This increase reflects the full cost of staff time required to review appeal materials, prepare staff reports, coordinate hearings, and support Planning Commission or City Council consideration.

Some Councilmembers expressed concern that a significant increase in appeal fees could discourage individuals from exercising their right to appeal City decisions, particularly for residents or small property owners who may already be navigating a complex regulatory process.

At the same time, Councilmembers and staff noted that appeals can require significant staff time and public resources. Several past situations were referenced where appeals were filed frequently, sometimes as a strategic tactic or with a low likelihood of success, which resulted in substantial staff and Council time being dedicated to those cases.

During the discussion, it was suggested that a higher appeal fee could help discourage frivolous or speculative appeals, while also recognizing that individuals who bring legitimate appeals should not be penalized for doing so.

As a potential solution, Councilmembers discussed the concept of making appeals fees refundable if the appellant prevails, allowing the City to discourage frivolous appeals while ensuring that applicants with valid appeals are not financially penalized.

Based on the discussion, several policy options could be considered regarding appeal fees:

Option 1: Maintain the Proposed Increased Appeal Fee at Full Cost Recovery (No Refunds) 735
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 5 of 7
Adopt the appeal fee recommended in the User Fee Study ($1,253), which reflects the estimated cost of staff time required to process appeals.

Option 2: Refund Fee if the Appeal is Successful
Adopt a higher appeal fee consistent with the cost of service but refund the fee if the appellant prevails in the appeal.

Option 3: Partial Refund Structure
The appeal fee would be collected at filing, with a portion refunded if the appeal is successful. Cons – more complex to administer than a non-refundable fee.

Option 4: Tiered Appeal Fee Structure
Establish different appeal fees depending on the type of appeal or applicant (for example, administrative appeals vs. major development appeals).

If Council wishes to balance accessibility with discouraging frivolous appeals, a refundable appeal fee structure may provide the most equitable approach, as it allows the City to recover the cost of processing appeals while ensuring that successful appellants are not financially penalized.

Other Key Fee Adjustments
The Draft User Fee Study includes a number of adjustments intended to better align fees with the cost of providing services and to simplify the City’s fee structure. The recommended adjustments are not limited to increases. In several cases, the study recommends reducing or restructuring fees where the analysis determined that current fees exceed the cost of service or where operational efficiencies have been achieved.

Examples of Fee Reductions
Several fees are recommended to be reduced as a result of the cost-of-service analysis. For example:
• Engineering review fees for certain services are recommended to decrease where the study found that current fees exceed the estimated cost of service. Examples are: Street/Property Abandonment fee, Encroachment Permit Fee.
• Business license renewal administrative fees are recommended to decrease due to efficiencies gained through automation and online processing of renewals – decrease from $68 to $63. New business one time 6 month license fee decreases from $42 to $32. • Several Fire permit fees, such as Fire Dance Permit Annual Fee, Fireworks/pyrotechnical Display Permit fees and Fire Plan Review Fee - Commercial, MFD, Special Event, are recommended to decrease.

Additionally, all Building fees are recommended to stay the same, while several Parks fees were recommended with no increase or several decreases.

Examples of Fee Increases
Some fees are recommended to increase where the study identified that current fees recover only a portion of the City’s actual cost of providing the service. Examples include:
• Certain planning and administrative processing fees where staff time required to process applications has increased since the last comprehensive fee study in 2015. 736
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 6 of 7
• New business license application administrative fees, which are recommended to increase from $86 to $108 (including the increased $31 Technology Fee) to better reflect the staff time required to process new business registrations and to recover the cost of several recent software upgrades.

In these cases, the recommended adjustments bring fees closer to the estimated cost of service while remaining within the limits allowed by California law governing regulatory fees.

Technology Fee Adjustment
The User Fee Study recommends increasing the City’s technology fee from $13 to $31 for applicable permits and licenses. This will allow to recover the actual annual system costs of $180,719.

The technology fee is intended to recover the cost of maintaining and supporting the digital systems that allow the City to provide modern customer service and efficient operations. These systems include:
• Online permitting and plan review platforms
• Business license administration systems
• Electronic payment processing
• Software licensing, maintenance, and system upgrades
• IT infrastructure necessary to support these services Since the last fee study, the City has significantly expanded its use of digital platforms to improve service delivery, streamline application processing, and provide online access to services for residents and businesses. While these systems improve efficiency and customer convenience, they also involve ongoing licensing, maintenance, and support costs.

The recommended adjustment to the technology fee reflects the City’s actual annual cost of maintaining these systems, which are used across multiple departments to support permitting, licensing, and customer service functions. Without this fee adjustment, these costs must be absorbed by the General Fund and funded by taxpayers rather than the users who benefit directly from the systems.

Many jurisdictions include a technology fee to support permitting and licensing systems, which have become essential tools for providing efficient customer service and modern government operations.

Adopting the updated technology fee helps ensure that the City can continue to maintain reliable digital services while aligning the fee with the actual cost of providing those services.

POLICY QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL
Staff requests direction regarding:

1. Target cost recovery levels for fee-supported services (full cost recovery vs. continued subsidy). Reviewing the summary results by department (Comprehensive Fee Study, page 11) would allow for discussion of fees by type.

2. Selection of an appeal fee structure.

3. Reconfirming of the City’s approach to EMS under-recovery.

4. Continued General Fund subsidy levels for recreation and other community-benefit programs.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)
Staff recommends that the City Council directs staff to adjust the Appeal Fee selecting one of the proposed options and accepting other GCP’s recommendations. 737
Council Agenda Report March 24, 2026 Page 7 of 7
The alternative option would be to not approve staff’s recommendation. If the City Council does not support staff’s recommendation, the current fee schedule will remain in effect, and the Master Fee Schedule will continue be updated as usual based on existing CPI adjustment formulas. This would result in an ongoing subsidy of project and permitting activities in the approximate amount of $1,007,194.

Financial Implications: The consultant’s report contains an estimated fiscal impact by department if full Cost of Services recovery is adopted. Adoption of full recommended adjustments would reduce General Fund subsidy by approximately $269,001 annually. Council direction may alter fiscal outcomes depending on selected cost recovery targets. Based on Council’s direction regarding cost recovery levels, staff will return with updated fiscal impact at a subsequent meeting.

Environmental Considerations: This is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

Policy Implications: This item supports the City’s Financial Policy “Strengthening Financial Position” and aligns with the 2025-2030 Strategic Plan, specifically the Core Value of “Sustainability” and the Strategic Priorities of “Efficient Government” and “Recreation and Equitable Access for All”. 738

C O M P R E H E N S I V E U S E R F E E S T U DY
Fe b r u a r y 2 0 2 6
GCP
GOVERNMENT CONSULTING PARTNERS, INC.
739

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Background…………………………………………….………………………………………..…………….…1
Existing South Lake Tahoe Fee Policy………………………………..………………….…………..……2 2 STUDY METHODOLOGY
Fee Inventory and Fee Structure Review………….………..…………….….…………………...….…4 Table: Proposed Fee Structure Changes and New Fees..………….….……..………5 Costing Methodology…………………….…………………………………..………………………….…....7 SME Focus Groups: Identifying Time Requirements by Task….…………………..………..….…7 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates: ……………………………..……………………….……...............…..8 3 FISCAL IMPACT
Summary Results by Department/ Division………..…..………..……………………….…….……11 4 ANALYSIS AND HIGHLIGHTS
Departmental Writeups………………………………………………………………….…..….….………13 5 FEE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Building……………………………………………………………………………...…..………………......…26 City Clerk……………………………………………………….…………………………………………........28 Engineering…………………………………………………….……………………………………….…....…29 Finance…………………………………….…………………………………………..…..…………..……..…31 Fire………………………………………………………………..………………………………………….....…33
Parks and Recreation……………….…………………………………………..…..…………..……….....35 Planning………………………………………………………...……………………………………..……...…39 Police…………………………………………………………….……………………………………..……...…41
6 FEE COMPARISON SURVEY
Survey of Fees Charged by Regional Agencies……………….…………………………………....…43

APPENDIX A
Adopted Recreation and Aquatic Center Fee Schedule…………………………………………...46 740

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 1
Government Consulting Partners, Inc (GCP) is a Sacramento-based consulting firm specializing in cost and revenue studies for state and local government.
1 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

The City of South Lake Tahoe delivers many services to the public for a fee. This report focuses on “user fees”, which are assessed in order to recover the cost of labor-based services or use of city facilities. A comprehensive review of user fees was last conducted in 2015. Since that time fees have been reviewed and increased annually by CPI where and when it was appropriate. The City engaged GCP to conduct a comprehensive review of user fee costs and associated revenues using 2025 financial and operational data.

User fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, Proposition 218 and the California Code of Regulations, including Government Code 66000 et seq. By law, user fees may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which they were levied, unless approved by a two-thirds vote of the electorate.

As more fiscal limitations are imposed on local government, user fees have become an increasingly important source of revenue. A user fee is a payment made by an individual or business that primarily benefits the individual or business rather than the community at large. Government agencies can charge a user fee for a service when 1) the individual’s decision to use a service is voluntary, and 2) the fee charged is reasonably related to the level of service rendered and cost of providing the service.

This report presented GCP’s comprehensive review of South Lake Tahoe’s user fees with the goal of aligning fees with current fiscal policy and Council priorities.

The study covered user fees charged by the following departments/divisions:
 Building
 City Clerk
 Engineering
 Finance
 Fire
 Parks and Recreation
 Planning
 Police
AQUATIC CENTER FEES – GCP also reviewed the City’s new Aquatic’s Center. GCP accelerated this portion of the study to accommodate the Center’s grand opening in early 2026. Aquatic Center fees were approved by Council in November 2025 under a separate report.

VACATION HOME RENTAL FEES - GCP reviewed staff’s internally prepared Vacation Home Rental (VHR) annual and inspection fee calculations and provided feedback. Updated VHR fees were adopted by Council in June, 2025 under a separate report.

GCP’s project’s scope included calculating the cost of each fee-related service, conducting a survey of fees charged by regional agencies, and recommending fee adjustments aligned with established Council policy. 741

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 2

S O U T H L A K E T A H O E E X I S T I N G F E E

P O L I C Y
GCP reviewed established Council user fee policy for setting fees and fee structures. The City’s Financial Policy was last revised in 2013. Section D provides the following guidance regarding the imposition of user fees:
742

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 3
Key user fee principles from the City’s policy include:
 Revenues from user fees shall not exceed the cost of providing the service.  Cost recovery goals shall be based on the total cost of delivering the service.  The method of assessing and collecting fees shall be as simple as possible.  Fee levels shall be sensitive to the market for similar services.  Fee levels shall be sensitive to smaller, infrequent users of the service.  The level of cost recovery shall consider community-wide versus special benefit.  The level of cost recovery shall consider the financial benefit to the service users.

The goal of this report is to present the study’s findings in a relevant and concise format that allows City leadership to make informed user-fee pricing decisions consistent with existing fee policy. 743

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 4
2 STUDY METHODOLOGY
Upon project commencement -GCP met with Finance staff to better understand the goals and priorities for the new fee schedule. A workplan was then developed to ensure that the proposed fee schedule resulting from the study reflects these priorities.

F E E S T R U C T U R E R E V I E W

A key component of the workplan included
restructuring of existing fees. In collaboration
with GCP, City staff reviewed the existing fee
structure and identified areas where fees
could be realigned to more accurately reflect
the City’s processes and the services being
provided. Every proposed change is
designed to accomplish one of several
things: streamline the fee calculation process;
increase user-friendliness; or increase equity
across the customer base.

As part of the restructuring process, GCP
surveyed fee schedules from comparison
agencies to better understand regional best
practice fee structures and trends. GCP
shared this compiled data with staff as well as
the actual fee schedules themselves.

All flat and tiered fees are supported by average processing times and staffing fully burdened hourly rates.

Reducing reliance on deposit-based fees in favor of flat or tiered structures increases predictability for customers.

The City recently instituted a customer portal enabling electronic plan submittals and payment services, greatly reducing wait times at the public counter.

Streamlining the fee schedule was a significant focus of the study. A streamlined fee schedule saves valuable time for both City counter staff and the City’s customers.

After GCP and City staff discussed and reviewed all available fee structure options a final consensus was reached for each group of fees. Table 1 summarizes the proposed fee structure changes.
744

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 5
Table 1: Proposed Fee Structure Changes and New Fees

CITY CLERK
11 Public Property Use Fee (for filming only) Change to See Facility Rental Fee Schedule
See Facility Rental Fee
Schedule
13 City Council AV Service Fee NEW Per Hour (1 hour
minimum)
14 Film Application Fee Special NEW
Applications that require
additional City Clerk, Fire,
Police or Public Works,
review will be charged
the hourly rate of the
Department Head
reviewing the Permit
Application.
15 Film Appliation Fee Rush (less than 7 business days) NEW Base Fee x 1.5 16 Film Permit Change Fee NEW Flat Fee

FINANCE
16 Business License Label Report $63 Flat Fee Remove
745

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 6

FIRE RESCUE
2 EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support, incident response Per Hour Flat Fee 3 EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support - with standby to support air ambulance transport, incident response Flat Fee Remove
4 EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support - with engine standby for CPR, incident response Flat Fee Remove 6 County Fire Services: Lake Valley Fire District Contract Per Hour Remove 7 County Fire Services: Fallen Leaf Fire District Contract Per Hour Remove 11 Wild Land Suppression: Ladder Truck CA OES Hourly Rate Remove 25 Pipeline/Power Lines: Fire Hydrant Flow Test Flat Fee Remove 26 Pipeline/Power Lines: Witnessed Acceptance Test Flat Fee Remove 28 Pipeline/Power Lines: Structure Fire Suppression (includes scene safety, initial investigation, traffic control, patient contact, hazard control) Hourly Flat Fee 37 Open Burning and Recreational Fires Flat Fee Remove
38 Ceremonial/Special Permit New Fee
43 Photographs Flat Fee Remove
44 Video Tape Duplication Flat Fee Remove
47 Per Event Inspection Per Hour Remove
50 Tree Removal Permit New Fee
51 Special Event / Fire Inspections (3 hour min if conducted outside regular work hours) Hourly Remove 55 Auto Alarm/Ext Supression System - 100 1-99 Per Inspection Remove 56 Auto Alarm/Ext Supression- 100+ Per Inspection Remove 57 Suppression Sys-50 hds/Dry Chem sys Flat Fee Remove
58 Suppression Sys-200 hds Flat Fee Remove
62 Board 7 Care Facility 7-50 Flat Fee Remove
63 Board 7 Care Facility 50+ Flat Fee Remove
70 Basic Fire Inspection - Hourly, after 4 hours New Fee 76 Fire Processing Permit Fee New Fee
746

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 7

C O S T I N G M E T H O D O L O G Y
Most fees in this study were calculated via a per-unit analysis approach. Commonly called a “bottom-up” approach, this method analyzes direct staff time required to deliver one unit of service. Indirect rates are then applied to reflect services and supplies, administrative and all overhead costs required to deliver each service. Resulting in a detailed, fully burdened cost perunit assessment.

GCP’s per-unit methodology includes the following five steps to build the individual per unit costs:

1. Define the fees to be analyzed.

2. Analyze direct staff time spent on the fee-related services.

3. Develop fully burdened hourly rates for direct staff.

4. Compare total costs to the current fee schedule.

5. Annualize results by extrapolating per-unit results by typical volume demand.

1. Define the fees to be analyzed
GCP worked with staff to identify any proposed new fees, obsolete fees and fee structure changes to establish a final list of fee-related services to be analyzed.

2. SME Focus Groups: Identifying time requirements by task Once all fee structure decisions were finalized, GCP interviewed subject matter experts (SME) to estimate the average time spent by task on each fee category. Each fee was reviewed individually, and City staff worked collaboratively with GCP to identify the specific tasks associated with each service. Table 2 below provides an example of the time/task documentation for a major sign review within Planning.
747

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 8
Table 2: Sample of Time / Task detail: Planning
Analyzing fee services
at this level of
granularity provides
higher confidence in
study results.

Accurate and
detailed time
estimates, multiplied
by staff FBHR’s form
the maximum the City
may legally charge by
fee category.

Table 3: Methods used to evaluate reasonableness
GCP performed a series of checks to
ensure the reasonableness of data inputs.

After several rounds of reasonableness
checks and data refinement final time
figures were then entered into the fee
model along with associated cost and
demand data.

These checks were used to focus GCP and staff’s internal quality control reviews on fees that are outliers in one way or another. Where possible, the City’s data systems were queried to provide data to either inform or corroborate staff’s efforts.

3. Develop fully burdened hourly rates (FBHR’s)
Establishing FBHR’s is essential to any user fee study engagement because these rates lay the foundation to calculating the full cost of providing services. FBHR’s can be used to determine how much it costs the City to deliver any labor-based service. Reliable FBHR’s ensure the study’s findings, recommendations and resulting fee schedules are based on real defensible costs. This promotes both transparency and financial sustainability.

Calculate the Annual Full Cost of Direct Staff: The FBHR calculation process incorporated data from the following sources:
 Staffing costs were calculated using the City’s budgeted compensation data, including salaries and benefits, for employees responsible for performing the feerelated services. 748

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 9
 Operating costs directly associated with service delivery—such as materials, supplies, and contracted services—were incorporated into the fully burdened rate to ensure a comprehensive reflection of total service costs.
 Overhead costs were included and applied to the division’s direct salary and benefit expenses to calculate the fully burdened hourly rates.
o Division overhead: Division overhead includes indirect costs such as labor from managers, supervisors and support staff, internal meetings, training, general counter time and shared supplies that support overall service delivery within the division.
o Citywide overhead: represents the allocation of indirect costs from the City’s cost allocation plan, covering central support service departments such as Human Resources, Information Technology, and Finance that provide essential resources and support to all departments throughout the organization.

Identify Annual Available Work Hours per FTE: This becomes the denominator in the rate.

Conceptually, the idea is to reflect the average number of hours in a year that an FTE is typically available to deliver services. By including only available work hours in the denominator, instead of the traditional 2,080, the rates are “fully burdened” sufficient to recover the full annual cost of one FTE, assuming normal construction demand levels.

For this study GCP used the industry-standard staffing available hours figure of 1,800.

4. Compare total service cost to the current fee charged Once the fully burdened hourly rate is applied to the time estimates for each fee category, this creates the “total cost” per unit. GCP compared the total cost for each fixed-fee service to the fee currently charged. This provided the initial results on the percentage of current cost recovery under the City’s existing fees.

If the current cost recovery for a particular service is under 100%, this implies the fee does not cover the cost of providing the service and can be increased. If the current cost recovery is over 100%, then the fee is set too high and must be lowered to comply with State laws prohibiting the making of a profit on user fee activities.

5. Annualization of the Per Unit results
GCP projected the annual fiscal impact by multiplying current and proposed fees by annual demand figures. Demand figures were estimated based on the following assumptions:
749

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 10
 Estimates of demand are used for any new or restructured fee categories.  Revenue produced by deposit-based fee categories is often difficult to predict. These fees are based on the type and complexity of the project. Deposit based fees are seen as revenue neutral since they are based on actual time spent multiplied by the hourly rate and therefore are assumed to be 100% cost recovery.
750

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 11
3 FISCAL IMPACT

S U M M A R Y R E S U L T S B Y D E P T / D I V I S I O N In cooperation with city staff, GCP developed cost and revenue projections for each area under study. Costs and revenues were primarily projected by extrapolating individual per-unit results for an entire year of demand activity. The combined findings result shows an overall $269,001 net revenue increase on an annual basis, assuming historic demand levels. The table below summarizes the fiscal impact of our findings and recommendations for each fee area under study.

The study’s fiscal projections are approximations and should be approached conservatively. It is recommended that staff monitor actual fiscal impacts beginning with the first six months of actual revenue data.

The fiscal impact table shows the current annual fee revenue of $4,002,706. With associated costs of $5,009,900 for an overall cost recover rate of 80%. Leaving $1,007,194 (20%) in unrecovered or subsidized costs.

If the recommended fee adjustments are adopted, annual revenues are projected to increase to $4,271,707 representing a $269,001 revenue increase.

Staff made careful considerations when developing these recommendations. While many fees are projected to increase, several are proposed at less than full cost recovery at this time. Moving to full cost would result in significant impacts to users. GCP recommends gradually monitoring these fees over the coming years to ensure they remain aligned with actual staff time and service delivery costs.
751

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 12

T E C H N O L O G Y S U R C H A R G E
The City assesses a flat $13 transaction fee to cover the cost of technology related to business licenses and building permits. The technology fee provides a dedicated revenue stream for the acquisition, update and regular
maintenance of the City’s HdL and
Community Development data licensing
and permitting systems and other related
technologies required to provide
advanced cloud-based services to its
customers.

The City’s projected cost of providing
technology services to permit-holders is
$180,719 annually, or $31 per business
license or development permit issued in a
typical year.

Having a dedicated revenue source for
technology costs improves transparency
and facilitates future cost/fee alignments.

Chapter 6 of this report compares the
proposed Technology Fee against similar
fees charged by regional cities and
counties.
752

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 13
4 ANALYSIS AND HIGHLIGHTS
The User Fee program chapter summarizes findings and recommendations for each department reviewed in the study. They present key financial results, including cost-of-service calculations, current cost recovery rates, and anticipated changes in revenue based on proposed fee updates.

This section also highlights recommended adjustments to each of the fee schedules, such as eliminating outdated fees, introducing new ones, and combining similar charges to enhance transparency and consistency. The full list of the proposed fees can be found in section 5 of this report.

B U I L D I N G
The Building division’s mission is to enforce minimum building code requirements to safeguard the public health, safety and general welfare through structural strength, means of egress, stability, sanitation, adequate light and ventilation, energy conservation and green building systems.

The Building division provides these services at the request of property owners and developers seeking to build or enhance and change the current use of their property.

GCP used a variety of methods to test whether the division’s fees meet the cost vs revenue standards of Government Code 66014 et seq. which states that revenue received in return for a service must not exceed reasonable related costs.

South Lake Tahoe’s building division operates in an environment that has complexities beyond most other departments, including:
 A limited five-month development window.
 Additional TRPA regulations and requirements add an additional layer of complexity to the City’s review and approval processes.

Building permits are charged based on the construction valuation (market value, less land costs and profit) of the proposed project. A flat 2% fee is applied against construction valuation to cover the cost of inspecting projects for adherence to the California Building Code. The division charges separate flat fees for individual electrical, plumbing and mechanical permits.

GCP prepared a total cost vs total revenue matchup for the Building division. 753

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 14
The analysis for the Building division projects an overall cost of $2,152,802 with associated revenues of $2,294,906, for a $142,104 revenue surplus. GCP recommends no adjustments to Building division fees in light of the fiscal analysis (aside from an increase in the Technology Fee as discussed on page 13 of this report, which would add $27,486 revenue). Building fees and costs are intended to even out over the course of a development cycle. GCP reviewed South Lake Tahoe’s Building revenues over a five-year period and finds revenue generated by current fee levels offsets the average cost of operating the Building division.

Multi-Year Trend Analysis
It is important to analyze a Building division over a period of years because building revenues are highly dependent on demand
levels and where we fall within the current
construction-cycle. The Table to the right
presents Building’s cost vs revenue picture
over a 5-year history. Figures reflect budgeted
costs and revenues. The full cost line reflects
internal costs (inspection, plan-check, public
counter) as well as support from Planning,
Public Works and Fire. Future revenue
depends heavily on construction demand,
while staffing and other costs remain relatively
stable over time to ensure projects are plan
checked and inspected within acceptable
timeframes.

C I T Y C L E R K
The City Clerk’s department is directly responsible to the public and serves as a direct link between the residents and their government. While a majority of the duties performed by the City Clerk’s department are non-fee related, there are a handful of user fees that the department is responsible for providing.

The user fee cost analysis for the City Clerk’s department shows an overall cost recovery of $13,015 (37%) with $21,971 (63%) unrecovered. GCP is recommending that all fees on the City Clerk’s fee schedule be set at 100% cost recovery. If the recommendations are adopted, the estimated annual revenue would increase to $34,971 for an increase of $21,956.

FEE AREA

COST OF FEE

RELATED

SERVICES

CURRENT

USER FEE

REVENUE
COST

RECOVERY
RATE

GENERAL

FUND SUBSIDY

PROJECTED

REVENUE
FROM

PROPOSED
FEES
COST

RECOVERY

RATE AT

PROPOSED
FEES

PROJECTED

REVENUE

INCREASE
City Clerk $34,971 $13,015 37% $21,956 $34,971 100% $21,956 754

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 15
New Fees Added
There are four new fees that are proposed to add to the fee schedule:
 City Council AV Service Fee
 Film Application Fee Special
 Film Application Fee Rush (less than 7 business days)  Film Permit Change Fee

In addition to the four new fees, the department is recommending setting the appeals fee at 100% cost recovery. Based on the comparison survey results below, the recommendation is to increase the current appeals fee from $380 to $1,253.

Note – fees used in a comparison survey are subject to change and present a snapshot in time.

The full list of the proposed fees can be found in section 5 of this report.

E N G I N E E R I N G
Engineering is charged with the task of safeguarding life, health, property, and public welfare through review, design, bid and construction of public improvement projects constructed on City property and within the City’s right-of-way. The division implements water quality programs to reduce the pollutant loads which flow into, and are discharged from the City’s storm water infrastructure to Lake Tahoe.

Engineering is also responsible for inspecting construction in the public right-of-way processing plans, permits and applications for land development. These services were the primary focus of GCP’s analysis.

City/Municipality Appeals Fee Type of Appeal
Douglas County, NV $ 898 Appeal of staff decision To Planning Commission (PC) Douglas County, NV $ 1,047 Appeal PC decision to Board of County Commission Placer County, CA $ 688 Appeal
Nevada County, CA $ 1,976 Planning Agency Appeals
Nevada County, CA $ 1,976 Planning Commission Appeals
Nevada County, CA $ 1,976 Zoning Administrator Appeals
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency $ 1,235 Appeal of Executive Director Decisions Tahoe Regional Planning Agency $ 1,668
Appeal of Local Government Decision Pursuant to Area Plan MOU
Peer Average $ 1,433
South Lake Tahoe (Current) $ 380
South Lake Tahoe (Proposed) $ 1,253
755

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 16
Engineering expended a total of $40,685 on providing fee-related services while generating $62,816 revenue, for an over recovery of $22,131. GCP recommends all fees be adjusted to 100% cost recovery. If the fee recommendations are adopted, the estimated annual revenue would decrease by $22,148.

F I N A N C E
The Finance department is responsible for protecting the City’s fiscal health and sustainability.

Although many of the Finance department’s duties are non-fee related, there are a handful of user fees that the department is responsible for providing.

The user fee cost analysis for the Finance department shows an overall cost recovery of $342,045 (103%) with an over recovery of $8,782. GCP is recommending that all fees on the Finance department fee schedule be set at 100% cost recovery. For those fees currently experiencing more than 100% cost recovery, the fee would need reduced to 100%. Fees currently experiencing less than 100% cost recovery would need to increase to 100%. If the fee recommendations are adopted, the estimated annual revenue would decrease to $333,263.

There are eight fees that are proposed to decrease. The decreases are a direct result of efficiencies in the process to provide services in addition to shifting work to a lower position title to perform.

Business and Professions Tax Rates
 Administrative Fee - New Business One Time 6 Month License Application  Administrative Fee - Annual Renewal (Including $31 Business License Technology Fee)  Business License Certificate - duplicate copy
TOT and Business License Reports
These four reports will not have an impact on revenue. The was no volume associated with these fees in the past year.

FEE AREA

COST OF FEE

RELATED

SERVICES

CURRENT

USER FEE

REVENUE
COST

RECOVERY
RATE

GENERAL

FUND SUBSIDY

PROJECTED

REVENUE
FROM

PROPOSED
FEES
COST

RECOVERY

RATE AT

PROPOSED
FEES

PROJECTED

REVENUE

INCREASE
Finance $333,263 $342,045 103% -$8,782 $333,263 100% -$8,782 756

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 17
 Motel Tax Master (name/address listing)
 Individual TOT Report
 Vacation Home Rental Master Report
 Vacation Home Rental Label Report
Miscellaneous
Return Check (NSF) Processing – 1st check was increased by CPI but is set by statue and should be reduced to $25.

The full list of the proposed fees can be found in section 5 of this report.

F I R E
The South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue Division provides essential life-safety services, including emergency medical response, fire suppression, rescue, hazardous-materials mitigation, wildfire prevention, and community risk-reduction. Because these services require highly trained staff, specialized equipment, and constant readiness, service fees must be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the true cost of service, meet the City’s cost-recovery goals, and sustain reliable emergency response in a community with significant seasonal demand and unique public-safety risks.

The cost analysis results for Fire Rescue fees is shown below.

The cost analysis for the Fire Recue shows an overall cost recovery of $159,490 (20%) current fee revenue with a cost of $785,699 leaving (80%) uncollected costs.

If staff fee recommendations are adopted, estimated annual revenue would increase to $206,661, an increase of $47,171 These projections are estimates only; actual revenues depend on activity levels, compliance, billing and collection practices, and any future changes to fee structures or City policies.

A significant portion of uncollected revenue is attributable to Fire Advanced and Basic Life Support services, which are rarely reimbursed at full cost. Insurance providers typically cover only a portion of actual expenses, creating a gap between true service costs—including personnel, equipment, supplies, and overhead—and amounts recovered. City staff estimate that only 25– 30% of actual service costs are currently collected.

FEE AREA

COST OF FEE

RELATED

SERVICES

CURRENT

USER FEE

REVENUE
COST

RECOVERY
RATE

GENERAL

FUND SUBSIDY

PROJECTED

REVENUE
FROM

PROPOSED
FEES
COST

RECOVERY

RATE AT

PROPOSED
FEES

PROJECTED

REVENUE

INCREASE
Fire Rescue $785,699 $159,490 20% $626,209 $206,661 26% $47,171 757

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 18
Updates to the Fee Schedule
GCP collaborated with the division’s staff to align fees with the services provided, confirming that the existing structure was well organized and effectively serving the City. Only a few minor adjustments were made to the overall layout of the fee schedule.

The current Fire Rescue fee schedule includes 60 fees, encompassing flat fees, actual cost, hourly rates, and fines. Following this study, 15 obsolete fees are recommended for removal, resulting in a proposed schedule of 45 fees.

The proposed Fire Rescue fees changes include:

New Fees:
 Ceremonial/Special Permit – Flat Fee
 Tree Removal Permit – Flat Fee
 Basic Fire Inspection, after hours – Per Hour
 Fire Processing Permit Fee – Flat Fee
Fee Removal:
 Following a comprehensive review, select fees are being removed to better align the fee schedule with current service delivery practices, cost recovery principles, and legal requirements. This update helps simplify the fee structure while ensuring fees are applied only where a clear and supportable relationship exists between the service provided and the fee charged. Below is a consolidated list of those services and a brief description of why it’s being removed. 758

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 19
Fee Restructuring
 Eleven fees are proposed to be converted from hourly rates to flat fees, as staff were unaware, they were listed as hourly and they were never intended or charged as such.

The full list of the proposed fees can be found in section 5 of this report.

Fee Removal Reason
EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support – with standby to
support air ambulance transport, incident response
Not charged separately. EMS services are billed under a flat-rate structure, making an additional standby fee unnecessary.

EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support – with engine standby
for CPR, incident response
Not charged separately. EMS services are provided under a flat-rate fee regardless of the level or type of medical response.

County Fire Services: Lake Valley Fire District Contract Fees are not charged to other fire agencies. Services are addressed through interagency agreements or invoicing as needed, not user fees.

County Fire Services: Fallen Leaf Fire District Contract Fees are not charged to other fire agencies. Services are handled through interagency agreements or invoicing as needed, not user fees.

Wild Land Suppression: Ladder Truck Ladder trucks are not deployed on wildland incidents.

Pipeline/Power Lines: Fire Hydrant Flow Test Hydrant flow testing is no longer performed by the Fire Department; hydrants are owned and maintained by STPUD.

Pipeline/Power Lines: Witnessed Acceptance Test The Fire Department does not perform witnessed acceptance testing.

Open Burning and Recreational Fires Open burning and recreational fires are not permitted within city limits.

Photographs No fee is charged. Public records requests are processed through the City Clerk’s Office, which may assess fees as applicable.

Video Tape Duplication No fee is charged. Public records requests are processed through the City Clerk’s Office, which may assess fees as applicable.

Per Event Inspection
Per-event inspections are not required for fire dancers holding a valid annual permit, as safety requirements are already demonstrated and approved.

Suppression Sys – 50 hds / Dry Chem Sys Consolidated into the automatic alarm/suppression system fee.

Suppression Sys – 200 hds Consolidated into the automatic alarm/suppression system fee.

Board & Care Facility (7–50) Consolidated into the daycare facility fee.

Board & Care Facility (50+) Consolidated into the daycare facility fee.

Special Event / Fire Inspections (3 hour min if conducted outside regular work hours) Already Covered in Fire Inspection Fee Auto Alarm/Ext Supression System - 100 1-99 Duplicate Fee - Already covered Auto Alarm/Ext Supression- 100+ Duplicate Fee - Already covered 759

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 20

P A R K S A N D R E C R E A T I O N
In phase I of the Parks and Recreation fee analysis, GCP focused on the fees for the new Recreation and Aquatics Center that is scheduled to open in spring 2026. On November 4, 2025, the City Council adopted the new Recreation and Aquatics Center fee schedule which is referenced in Appendix A of this study.

Phase II of the Parks and Recreation fee study represents the analysis of the remaining fee related program categories listed below:
 Outdoor Park Facility Rentals: Picnic Shelters and Picnic Areas  Outdoor Park Facility Rentals: Regan Beach West
 Special Event Facility Rentals (large scale events): Lakeview Commons; Bijou Park (entire park), Regan Beach
 Bijou Golf Course
 Campground
 Boat Ramp
The revenues for these program categories have been updated since the phase I report was issued. The results for the phase II service category analysis are shown below:

The user fee cost analysis for the remaining Parks and Recreation program categories show an overall cost recovery of $656,249 (66%) with $337,481 (34%) unrecovered. If staff recommendations are adopted, projected revenue would be $691,038 (70%) for an increase of $34,789.

Part of the unrecovered costs comes directly from the state capped fees for the Boat Ramp which shows an overall cost recovery of $36,464 (21%) with a cost of $169,971, leaving $133,507 (79%) unrecovered or subsidized by the city.

The individual program category results are listed below:

FEE AREA

COST OF FEE

RELATED

SERVICES

CURRENT

USER FEE

REVENUE
COST

RECOVERY
RATE

GENERAL

FUND SUBSIDY

PROJECTED

REVENUE
FROM

PROPOSED
FEES
COST

RECOVERY

RATE AT

PROPOSED
FEES

PROJECTED

REVENUE

INCREASE
Parks and Recreation $993,730 $656,249 66% $337,481 $691,038 70% $34,789 760

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 21
Many of the fees within the phase II categories represent facility rentals or use of government property. In 2010, Proposition 26 was adopted and states that user fees are limited to the "estimated reasonable cost of providing a service" by Government Code section 66014(a) and other supplementary legislation. In particular, Proposition 26 established that fees charged for the use of government property are exempt from Proposition 26. These include fees for parks and facility rentals as well as green fees, carts, and other equipment rental fees. All of these fees may be set at a price the market will bear.

Based on the overall results, GCP performed a comparison survey of various outdoor park facility rentals, 9-hole golf courses, and campgrounds. It is common for agencies to want to compare their fees to other agencies, however, it is important to note that not all facilities may be an apples-to-apples comparison. For example, a straight comparison of a 9-hole golf course does not take into account the quality or condition of the course or whether or not the facility offers a club house or other amenities. A comparison survey can provide some guidance when looking at the key considerations but ultimately staff’s comments were heavily considered when making the final recommendations.

Other key considerations that were taken into account when setting the recommendations included:
 Price Elasticity of Demand: When proposing fee recommendations, the elasticity of demand for the service should be considered. For example, will raising the fee result in a loss of participants or number of rentals or is the demand there to sustain participation levels. 29 Outdoor Park Facility Rentals: Picnic Shelters and
Picnic Areas $ 28,102.93 5,091.00 $ 18%
30 Outdoor Park Facility Rentals: Regan Beach West $ 28,102.93 25,902.00 $ 92% 31 Special Event Facility Rentals (large scale events):

Lakeview Commons; Bijou Park (entire park),
Regan Beach $ 25,756.16 6,504.00 $ 25%
39 Bijou Golf Course 203,765.00 $ 437,754.38 $ 47%
40 Campground 378,524.00 $ 304,042.63 $ 124%
41 Boat Ramp 36,464.00 $ 169,970.56 $ 21%
City of South Lake Tahoe
Parks and Recreation
Service Category Name

CURRENT
COST
RECOVERY %

CURRENT

REVENUE

TOTAL ANNUAL
COST
761

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 22
 Competition: Certain services, such as facility rentals, may be provided by neighboring communities or the private sector, and therefore demand for these services can be highly dependent on what else may be available.

The following represent some of the highlighted fee changes:

Outdoor Park Facility Rentals: Picnic Shelters and Picnic Areas and Regan Beach West - GCP recommends that the fees under this program category increase by CPI.

Special Event Facility Rentals (large scale events): Lakeview Commons; Bijou Park and Regan Beach
Currently there are two tiers for the Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or Regan Beach Special Event Rental: attendance up to 500 persons and attendance 501-1,000 persons.

Staff recommend adding a third tier for attendance 1,001-2,000 persons and adjusting the fees for the three tiers. (see below)
Other fee changes under this program category include:
 Increase in the Bijou Community Park Parking Lot Rental and the Community Playfield Parking Lot Rental fee
 New fee added for the Bijou Community Park Lawn Space (up to 100 persons)  Bijou Bike Park or Skate Park Rental and Disc Golf Course Rental for Tournaments & Special Events (Bijou Park) to increase by CPI.
 Facility Rental Setup Fee increase to match newly adopted fee on the Recreation and Aquatic Center fee schedule.

Bijou Golf Course
Fees are recommended to increase by 10% resulting in $18,872 in additional revenue.

Two new fees are recommended:
 Individual Senior Season Pass (no restrictions)
 Individual Junior Season Pass (no restrictions)
Campgrounds
Fee Name Comments
Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or
Regan Beach Special Event Rental, Attendance up to
500 persons
$1,091 Per Day $800 Per Day
Reduced by 27%
Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or
Regan Beach Special Event Rental, Attendance 501-
1,000 persons
$1,364 Per Day $1,364 Per Day
Increase by CPI
Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or
Regan Beach Special Event Rental, Attendance 1,001-
2,000 persons
New Per Day $1,900 Per Day
Increase fee from $1,364
to $1,900 which is a 39%
increase
Current Fee Proposed Fee
762

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 23
All but one fee is recommended to stay the same with no increase. The one exception is listed below:
 Campground Site Fee - No hook up, up to 6 people and 1 car (includes $10 infrastructure fee). This fee is recommended to increase 5%, resulting in $15,917 in additional revenue.

In addition to the phase II fees reviewed, staff recommend adding two new fees to the new Recreation and Aquatics Center fee schedule.
a. Family Dance
b. Gym Sports Event (per team)
c. Family Annual Pass (1 adult and 1 child)
d. Stage Rental Fee (Gym Rental, Pool Rental, Dance Fitness, Community Room and Event Space
The full list of the proposed fees can be found in section 5 of this report.

P L A N N I N G
The City’s planning, land use and zoning services are intended to protect, maintain and develop an attractive, safe, and healthy community by providing planning services to the general public, project applicants, and other City Departments.

The Planning division is responsible for reviewing and processing permits and applications for development
The cost analysis for Planning shows an overall cost of processing development projects of $497,592 while generating associated revenue of $340,255, for a 68% cost recovery rate.

If proposed fee adjustments are adopted, annual revenue will increase to approximately $497,259 for an increase of $157,034. These projections are estimates only; actual revenues depend on activity levels, compliance, billing and collection practices, and any future changes to fee structures or City policies.
763

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 24

P O L I C E
The Police department is primarily responsible for maintaining community quality of life by providing contemporary police response systems to meet the community’s expectations for service. The majority of services provided are not user fee related. However, the department does provide specific services which directly benefit an individual or business rather than the community as a whole and where a user fee charge is appropriate.

Several of the departments fees are restricted by the State of California. These fees have been proposed at the State prescribed amount. The remainder of fees are proposed for 100% cost recovery. The total cost of providing fee-eligible services annually is $171,158, while related revenue generated is $133,960 for a $37,198 subsidy. A combination of fee increases and decreases are proposed for a net $11,495 revenue increase.

FEE AREA

COST OF FEE

RELATED

SERVICES

CURRENT

USER FEE

REVENUE
COST

RECOVERY
RATE

GENERAL

FUND SUBSIDY

PROJECTED

REVENUE
FROM

PROPOSED
FEES
COST

RECOVERY

RATE AT

PROPOSED
FEES

PROJECTED

REVENUE

INCREASE
Police $171,158 $133,960 78% $37,198 $145,455 85% $11,495 764

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Comprehensive User Fee Study
Government Consulting Partners, Inc.
` Page 25
5 FEE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CITYWIDE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. GCP recommends the department update its user fees in non-study years by an annual inflation index to keep fees more closely aligned with staffing costs. We recommend the following index be applied as part of the regular budget cycle:
 Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI), San Francisco-OaklandHayward, December release.

Certain fees are exempt from these annual indexed adjustments, such as percentagebased fees or those limited by the State or Federal government to a specific dollar amount.

2. GCP recommends the City monitor the revenue generated by new and adjusted fees and performing a check at both six months and one year to ensure that new and restructured fees are performing the way they were intended.

3. GCP recommends that South Lake Tahoe conduct a detailed analysis at least every three to five years, with minor adjustments, such as new fees arising from new legislation, be incorporated as needed.

ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY DEPARTMENT/DIVISION
The following pages present GCP’s analysis and proposed fee for each user-fee related service.

765
Building
766
Fee Category
1 Building Permit Fee 2% % of valuation 2% 100% 100% 2% valuation 2 Administrative Processing $128 per hour/ 1 hr min. $128 100% 100% $151 per hour / 1 hr min. 3 Active Building Permit Extension $191 each $191 100% 100% $191 each 4 Building Plan Review Extension $191 each $191 100% 100% $191 each 5 Building Plan Review $128 per hour / 1 hr min. $128 100% 100% $128 per hour / 1 hr min. 6 Stop Work Notice of Violation $428 each $428 100% 100% $428 each 7 Stop Work/Red Tag Permit Fee 2x pmt each n/a n/a n/a 2x pmt 8 Special Building Inspections $177 per hour / 1 hr min. $177 100% 100% $177 per hour / 1 hr min. 9 Building Inspection/Reinspection Fee $177 each $177 100% 100% $177 each 10 Document Printing & Copying $0.10 per page $0.10 100% 100% $0.10 per page 11 Permit Technology Fee $13 each permit $31 42% 100% $31 each permit 12 Illegal Unit Review $1,107 each $1,107 100% 100% $1,107 each 13 Admin Fee for Cost of Collection on Liens, Nuisance, etc. 25% % of
collection costs 25% 100% 100% 25% of collection costs
14 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Application $177 each $177 100% 100% $177 each 15 Demolition Permit $440 each $440 100% 100% $440 each 16 Resid. Fire Sprinkler Insp: 1-50 heads $248 per inspection $248 100% 100% $248 per insp 17 Resid. Fire Sprinkler Insp: 51+ heads $604 per inspection $604 100% 100% $604 per insp 18 Resid. Fire Plan Review $128 hourly $128 100% 100% $128 hourly 19 General Plan/ Community Plan/Area Plan Maint Fee $1.15 construction
valuation $1.15 100% 100% $1.15 const val
21 Re-check Fee (4th + each add'l check) NEW each NEW 100% 100% $256 each 22 Fees for work not specifically identified elsewhere NEW hourly NEW 100% 100% $177 hourly City of South Lake Tahoe
Building PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Current Fee
Cost Per
Unit
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
To nearest $5
Fee
Description
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
767

REVENUE
10003110 BUILDING & SAFETY REVENUE ALL SOURCES USER FEE 33132 Federal ARP Act Funding $9,408 $9,408
34008 TRPA MOU $134,428 $134,428
34140 Building Fees $1,538,398 $1,538,398
34180 Printing & Duplicating $19 $19
34230 Fire-Prev Special Inspect Fees $153,184 $153,184
36322 Trans in From Bldg Permits (271) $250,000 $250,000 10003112 MFD REVENUE ALL SOURCES USER FEE
32900 Penalty & Interest $31,549
34151 MFD Annual Fee $160,481 $160,481
34154 SRO Fee $48,988 $48,988
27103110 REVENUE ALL SOURCES USER FEE
34140 Building Fees $502,076
35310 Interest/Dividends $70,354
2024 ACTUAL USER FEE REVENUE $2,294,906

EXPENSES
10003110 BUILDING & SAFETY EXPENSES ALL SOURCES USER FEE STAFFING $489,092 $489,092
BENEFITS $220,316 $220,316
CONTRACT SERVICES $416,306 $416,306
OTHER EXPENSES $20,544 $20,544
CITYWIDE INDIRECT COST $222,659 $222,659
10003112 MFD EXPENSES ALL SOURCES USER FEE
STAFFING $154,251 $154,251
BENEFITS $57,323 $57,323
OTHER EXPENSES $435 $435
CITYWIDE INDIRECT COST $32,707 $32,707
27103110 EXPENSES ALL SOURCES USER FEE
CITYWIDE INDIRECT COST $5,334 $227,993

TRANSFER IN FROM LR PLANNING ALL SOURCES USER FEE
PLANNING SUPPORT TO BUILDING $211,176

TRANSFER IN FROM FIRE ALL SOURCES USER FEE
FIRE SUPPORT TO BUILDING $50,000

TRANSFER IN FROM PUBLIC WORKS ALL SOURCES USER FEE
PW SUPPORT TO BUILDING $50,000
2024 ACTUAL EXPENSES $2,152,802
NET REVENUE SURPLUS $142,104

BUILDING DIVISION
Total Cost vs Total Revenue Matchup
2024 ACTUALS
768
City Clerk
769
1 Appeals $380 Per appeal $1,253 30% 100% $1,253 Per appeal 2 Document Printing and Copying - .10 per page plus
postage $0.10 Per document page $0.10 100% 100% $0.10 Per document page 3 City Council Chambers Use Application Fee $28 Per application $35 80% 100% $35 Per application 4 City Council Chambers Rental, M-F, 8-5 p.m. $44 Per Hour $50 88% 100% $50 Per Hour 5 Video Meeting Electronic File Transfer, 1 per Drive $5 Per Thumb Drive $5 100% 100% $5 Per Thumb Drive 6 Verbatim Transcript Service $0 Hourly or Actual Outsource Cost $0 0% 100% Hourly or Actual Outsource Cost
7 Notary Service $15 Per form $15 100% $15 Per form
8 Notary Service - Providing California Notary
Acknowledgement or Jurat Form $1 Per form $1 100% $1 Per form 9 Agenda Mailing Service, .10 per page plus postage $0.10 Per page plus postage $0 100% $0.10 Per page plus postage 10 Filming Application Fee Basic $197 Fixed Fee $164 120% 100% $164 Fixed Fee 11 Public Property Use Fee (for filming only) $767 Change to See Facility Rental Fee Schedule $0 0% See Facility Rental Fee Schedule 12 Temporary Sign Deposit (yard signs) $174 Refundable Deposit (Campaign) $0 0% $174 Refundable Deposit
(Campaign)
13 City Council AV Service Fee $0 New Fee: Per Hour (1 hour minimum) $99 0% 100% $99 New Fee: Per Hour (1 hour
minimum)
14 Film Application Fee Special $0
New Fee: Applications that
require additional City
Clerk, Fire, Police or Public
Works, review will be
charged the hourly rate of
the Department Head
reviewing the Permit
Application.
$192 0% 100% $192
New Fee: Applications that
require additional City
Clerk, Fire, Police or Public
Works, review will be
charged the hourly rate of
the Department Head
reviewing the Permit
Application.
15 Film Appliation Fee Rush (less than 7 business days) $0 New - Base Fee x 1.5 $0 0% $0 New - Base Fee x 1.5 16 Film Permit Change Fee $0 New - Fixed Fee $132 0% 100% $132 New - Fixed Fee 17 Airport Commercial Filming $0
Airport Commercial Filming
will be processed by Airport
Manager
$0 0% $0
Airport Commercial Filming
will be processed by Airport
Manager
Fee Category Fee Description Proposed Fee

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Current
Fee
Recommended
Cost Recovery
City of South Lake Tahoe -
City Clerk
Current
Cost
Recovery
Current
Cost Per
Unit
GCP
770
Engineering
771
1 Street/Property Abandonment $3,277 flat $2,855 115% 100% $2,855 flat 2 Single-Family Residential PW plan review $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 3 Multi-Family Residential PW plan review (6 units or less) $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 4 Large Multi-Family Residential PW plan review (7 or more units) $1,711 flat $145 n/a 100% $145 per hour
5 Commercial Development/Redev PW plan review $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 6 GIS Fee (special requests for information/maps) $347 flat $309 112% 100% $309 flat 7 Grading: <10 cubic yards (no fee) $0 free $0 n/a n/a $0 free 8 Grading: 10+ cubic yards $566 flat $754 75% 100% $754 flat 9 Grading: 8 - 350 cubic yards $957 REMOVE n/a n/a n/a REMOVE 10 Grading: 351+ cubic yards $2,468 REMOVE n/a n/a n/a REMOVE 11 Parcel Merger/Lot Line Adjustment/ Parcel Maps $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 12 Final Subdivision Map $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 13 Tentative Subdivision Map $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 14 Obstruction Permit $307 flat $340 n/a n/a $340 flat
15 Encroachment (street cut) Permit/Minor $766 flat $340 226% 100% $340 flat 16 Encroachment (street cut) Permit/Major $766
plus 1.5% of
Val over $20k $503 100% 100% $503
plus 1.5% of
Val over $20k
17 Transportation Yearly Permit $148 Set by State n/a n/a n/a $90 Set by State 18 Transportation Single Permit $105 Set by State n/a n/a n/a $16 Set by State 19 Permit Violation/ Stop Work Fee $1,532 flat n/a n/a n/a $1,532 flat 20 Storm Water Inspection Fee: Commercial $262 flat $293 90% 100% $293 flat 21 Storm Water Inspection Fee: Commercial Reinspection $131 flat $293 45% 100% $293 flat 22 Storm Water Inspection Fee: Industrial $327 flat $400 82% 100% $400 flat 23 Storm Water Inspection Fee: Industrial Reinspection $131 flat $400 33% 100% $400 flat 24 Easement Request/ Review $1,417 flat $4,368 32% 100% $4,368 flat 25 Reproduction Fee $4 per 23x26" $13 31% 100% $13 per 23x26" 26 Street Name Change actual cost actual cost n/a n/a n/a actual cost To nearest $1
Proposed Fee
Cost Per
Unit
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Public Works - Engineering
Org 3210
Fee Category Current Fee
Fee
Description
City of South Lake Tahoe

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
772
To nearest $1
Proposed Fee
Cost Per
Unit
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Public Works - Engineering
Org 3210
Fee Category Current Fee
Fee
Description
City of South Lake Tahoe

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
27 Unapproved Work (ROW)/ Correction Fee/ Inspections or Repairs to City Infrastructure $946 flat n/a n/a n/a $946 flat 28 PW Condominimization of Existing Resid. Development $128 per hour $145 88% 100% $145 per hour 29 PW Inspections/ Re-inspections $177 per insp $145 122% 100% $145 per hour 30 Third Party Plan Reviews New Fee Actual Cost n/a n/a n/a actual cost 31 Technology Fee $13 per permit $31 $1 $31 per permit
773
Finance
774
1 Administrative Fee - New license application
(Including $31 Business License Technology Fee) $86 application $108 80% $108 application 2 Administrative Fee - New Business One Time 6
Month License Application $42 application $32 131% $32 application 3 Administrative Fee - Annual Renewal (Including $31
Business License Technology Fee) $68 application $63 108% $63 application 4 AB1379 (amended SB1186; ADA info and access fee
- State of CA mandated; effective 1/1/2018 $4
per business
certificate $4 100% $4
per business
certificate
5 Business License Technology Fee; collected with
admin fee $13
business
application $31 42% $31
business
application
6 Business License Certificate - duplicate copy $19 certificate $12 158% $12 certificate 7 Lien Release Fee $0
lien: Passed on to
Seller through
Escrow $372 0% $372
lien: Passed on to
Seller through
Escrow
8 Administrative Fee for Delinquent Refuse
Collections $87 lien $87 100% $87 lien
9 Delinquent Tax Analysis $0
per project: At
cost using fully
burdened hourly
rate $0
per project: At cost
using fully
burdened hourly
rate
10 Motel Tax Master (name/address listing) $63 per report $40 158% $40 per report 11 Individual TOT Report $18
per motel/per
year $17 106% $17 per motel/per year
12 Vacation Home Rental Master Report $68 per report $40 170% $40 per report 13 Vacation Home Rental Label Report $63
per report plus
cost of labels $40 158% $40
per report plus cost
of labels
14 Business License Master Report, Standard Format $63 per report $79 80% $79 per report 15 Business License Master Report Requiring Specific
Formatting Due to Information Request $63
per report plus
fully burdened
hourly rate $79 80% $79
per report plus fully
burdened hourly
rate
17 Returned Check (NSF) Processing - 1st check $28 per check $25 112% $25 per check 18 Returned Check (NSF) Processing - Subsequent
checks $35 per check $35 100% $35 per check
Fee Category Cost
Recovery Fee Description

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Finance
Cost Per
Unit
City of South Lake Tahoe
Current Fee Proposed Fee
GCP
775
Fee Category Cost
Recovery Fee Description

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Finance
Cost Per
Unit
City of South Lake Tahoe
Current Fee Proposed Fee
19 Geobase Information Service, Research $0
At cost using fully
burdened hourly
rate per project $112 0% $112
At cost using fully
burdened hourly
rate per project
20 Stop Payment Fee $0
At cost using
actual bank
charge per check $0
At cost using actual
bank charge per
check
GCP
776
Department
Fire
777
2 EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support, incident response $532 Hourly --> Flat Rate $646 82% 93% $598 3 EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support - with standby to support air ambulance transport, incident response
$1,032 Remove Fee Remove
4 EMS: Advanced/Basic Life Support - with engine standby for CPR, incident response $1,032 Remove Fee Remove 6 County Fire Services: Lake Valley Fire District Contract Remove Fee Remove 7 County Fire Services: Fallen Leaf Fire District Contract Remove Fee Remove 9 Wild Land Suppression: Support Vehicle CA OES Rate CA OES Hourly Rate 100% 100% CA OES Rate 10 Wild Land Suppression: Pumping Engine CA OES Rate CA OES Hourly Rate 100% 100% CA OES Rate 11 Wild Land Suppression: Ladder Truck CA OES Hourly Rate - Remove
Remove
13 Motor Vehicle Accident: Level 1 Basic Response $1,159 Hourly --> Flat Rate $1,406 82% 100% $1,406 14 Motor Vehicle Accident: Level 2 Extrication $1,757 Hourly --> Flat Rate $1,879 94% 100% $1,878 15 Motor Vehicle Accident: Level 3 Multi Casualty $2,577 Hourly --> Flat Rate $3,337 77% 100% $3,337 17 Hazmat Cleanup: Level 1 Basic Response $771 Hourly --> Flat Rate $1,233 63% 100% $1,232 18 Hazmat Cleanup: Level 2 Full Alarm Response $2,577 Hourly --> Flat Rate $3,342 98% 100% $3,341 20 Bomb Squat Response: Level 1 Full Alarm Response $1,159 Hourly --> Flat Rate $1,233 94% 100% $1,232 21 Bomb Squat Response: Level 2 Full Alarm Engine Response plus TD Bomb Unit $2,577 Hourly --> Flat Rate $2,816 92% 100% $2,816 23 Pipeline/Power Lines: Level 1 Single Engine $1,159 Hourly --> Flat Rate $1,175 99% 100% $1,174 24 Pipeline/Power Lines: Level 2 Full Alarm Engine Response $2,577 Hourly --> Flat Rate $2,643 97% 100% $2,643 25 Pipeline/Power Lines: Fire Hydrant Flow Test $337 Remove Fee Remove 26 Pipeline/Power Lines: Witnessed Acceptance Test $337 Remove Fee Remove 27 Pipeline/Power Lines: Fire Watch Service Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost 100% 100% Actual Cost 28 Pipeline/Power Lines: Structure Fire Suppression (includes scene safety, initial investigation, traffic control, patient contact, hazard control) $2,577 Hourly --> Flat Rate $2,861 90% 100% $2,860 31 Level 1 Single Engine - Water Indicents $1,159 per incident $1,237 94% 100% $1,237 33 Level 1 in City - Search and Rescue $819 Per incident $1,233 66% 100% $1,232 35 False Alarm Responses 1st Offense $164 Fine $526 31% 31% $164 36 False Alarm Responses 2nd Offense + $274 Fine $526 52% 52% $274 37 Open Burning and Recreational Fires $273 Remove Fee Remove 38 Ceremonial/Special Permit $0 New Fee $70 0% 100% $70 39 Arson Investigation - Includes scene safety, investigation, source ID, Arson dog, equipment use, mobile detection and report Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost 100% 100% Actual Cost 40 Fire Investigation Reports $0 No Fee $41 0% 0% $0
41 Fire Incident Report $0 No Fee $41 0% 0% $0
42 Copies $0 Per Page --> No Fee $0 0% 0% $0
43 Photographs $0 Remove Remove
44 Video Tape Duplication $0 Remove Remove
45 Fireworks/Pyrotechnical Display Permit $448 flat $247 181% 100% $247 46 Fire Dance Permit Annual Fee $225 flat $189 119% 100% $189 47 Per Event Inspection Per Hour Remove Fee Remove
Fee Category
City of South Lake Tahoe
Fire Department PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Current Fee Fee Description Current Cost
Per Unit
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
778
Fee Category
City of South Lake Tahoe
Fire Department PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Current Fee Fee Description Current Cost
Per Unit
Current Cost
Recovery
Proposed Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
48 Defensible Space Inspections for AB38 (Real Estate Sale) $32 Hourly $148 22% 66% $98 49 Defensible Space Inspections for Homeowners (includes tree marking) $32 flat $148 22% 66% $98 50 Tree Removal Permit $0 New Fee $173 0% 43% $75
51 Special Event / Fire Inspections (3 hour min if conducted outside regular work hours) $177 Remove Fee Remove 53 Misc. Event Standby $0 CA OES Hourly Rate $338 0% 100% $337 55 Auto Alarm/Ext Supression System - 100 1-99 $248 Per Inspection Remove 56 Auto Alarm/Ext Supression- 100+ $445 Per Inspection Remove 57 Suppression Sys-50 hds/Dry Chem sys $248 Remove Fee Remove 58 Suppression Sys-200 hds $604 Remove Fee Remove
59 Underground Main Inspection <2” $121 Per Inspection $222 54% 100% $222 60 Underground Main Inspection >2” $248 Per Inspection $222 112% 100% $222 62 Board 7 Care Facility 7-50 $138 Remove Fee Remove
63 Board 7 Care Facility 50+ $343 Remove Fee Remove
64 Day Care Facility 6+ $128 Per Inspection $222 58% 89% $198 65 Fire Plan Review - Commercial, MFD, Special Event $263 Per Hour $199 132% 100% $199 66 Basic Fire Inspection, <1k k sq. ft. $96 flat $173 56% 100% $173 67 Basic Fire Inspection, 1k - 4k sq. ft. $134 flat $222 60% 100% $222 68 Basic Fire Inspection, 4k - 9k sq. ft. $161 flat $272 59% 100% $271 69 Basic Fire Inspection, >9 k sq. ft. $204 flat $346 59% 100% $345 70 Basic Fire Inspection - Hourly, after 4 hours $0 New Fee $99 0% 100% $99 71 Child Care Inspection Occupancy Permit Non-Home $109 flat $173 63% 100% $173 72 Child Care Inspection Occupancy Permit Home $109 flat $173 63% 100% $173 73 Miscellaneous Fire Services Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost 100% 100% Actual Cost 74 Fire Inspection/Re-Inspection (Including Special Events) $177 Per Hour $177 100% 100% $177 75 Operational Permit and Inspection CFC 105.6 - not including inspection $254 flat $247 103% 100% $247 76 Fire Processing Permit Fee New $151 100% $151
779
Parks and
Recreation
780
City of South Lake Tahoe
Parks and Recreation
Current Adopted
Fee
3/25/2025
Outdoor Park
Outdoor Park Facility Rentals
Alcohol Use Permit, City Sanctioned Public/Private
Outdoor Facilities $66 Each $66 $576 $576
Bijou Park, Kiwanis Picnic Shelter (4 Hours) $173 4 Hour Block $173 $2,096 $2,096 Bijou Park, Rotary Picnic Shelter (4 Hours) $173 4 Hour Block $173 $2,419 $2,419 Recreation Complex Group Picnic Areas (4 Hours) $173 4 Hour Block $173 $0 $0 Gazebos and Picnic Areas beyond 4 hour minimum rental $46 Hourly After 4 Hours
$46 $0 $0
Private Rental: Regan Beach West (Per Hour; 2-Hour
Minimum) (Rents for Wedding and special events) $222 Mon-Thur $/hr $222 $738 $738 $287 Fri & Sun $/hr $287 $7,200 $7,200
$349 Sat $/hr $349 $17,964 $17,964
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental
fee due
10% of total rental
fee due
10% of total rental
fee due
Public Special Event Park Rentals
Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or Regan
Beach Special Event Rental, Attendance up to 500 persons $1,091 Per Day $800 $0 $0 Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or Regan
Beach Special Event Rental, Attendance 501-1,000
persons
$1,364 Per Day $1,364 $0 $0
Lakeview Commons, Bijou Community Park or Regan
Beach Special Event Rental, Attendance 1,001-2,000
persons
New Per Day $1,900 $0 $0
Bijou Community Park Lawn Space (up to 100 persons) New Per Hour $50 $0 $0 Bijou Bike Park or Skate Park Rental $254 Per Day $254 $2,381 $2,381 Disc Golf Course Rental for Tournaments & Special Events (Bijou Park) $267 Per Day $267 $801 $801
Bijou Park Concession (absent lease agreement) $299 Per Day $299 $1,637 $1,637 Bijou Community Park Parking Lot Rental $105 Per Day $215 $0 $0 Community Playfield Parking Lot Rental $105 Per Day $215 $0 $0

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Program
Recovery
Percentage
Fee Category Fee Description Proposed Fee Current Revenue Projected Revenue 781
City of South Lake Tahoe
Parks and Recreation
Current Adopted
Fee
3/25/2025

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Program
Recovery
Percentage
Fee Category Fee Description Proposed Fee Current Revenue Projected Revenue Facility Rental Setup Fee $43 Per Hour Per Staff $48 $0 $0 Special Event Vendor Fee Not to Exceed
$125 per event
Not to Exceed
$125 per event
Not to Exceed $125
per event
$1,575 $1,575
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental
fee due
10% of total rental
fee due
10% of total rental
fee due
Group Rentals may be subject to $500 minimum or $1500
maximum security deposit and/or cleaning fees at the
discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
$500 $500 (Security
Deposit)
$500 minimum or
$1,500 Maximum
security deposit
and/or cleaning fees
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15
Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion
of City of South Lake Tahoe
$15 Minimum or
$50 Maximum
$15 (Cancellation
Fee)
$15 Minimum or
$50 Maximum $110 $110
Golf Course
9 Hole $20 Each $22 $77,765 $85,542
9 Hole Senior $18 Each $20 $36,990 $40,689
9 Hole Junior (17 and under) $11 Each $12 $1,408 $1,549 9 Hole Family (1 adult & 1 Junior (17 and under) $24 Each $26 $9,000 $9,900 Add 9 Holes $13 Each $14 $2,184 $2,402
Twilight (last 2 hours of tee times) $17 Each $19 $18,258 $20,084 Cart Rental $5 Each $6 $16,540 $18,194
Club Rental $17 Each $17 $15,045 $15,045
Golf Course Passes
20 Use $280 Each $308 $26,575 $29,232
10 Use $155 Each $171
10 Use Twilight (last 2 hours of daylight) $130 Each $143 10 Use Senior $140 Each $154
10 Use Family (1 Adult & 1 Junior (17 and under) $180 Each $198 782
City of South Lake Tahoe
Parks and Recreation
Current Adopted
Fee
3/25/2025

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Program
Recovery
Percentage
Fee Category Fee Description Proposed Fee Current Revenue Projected Revenue 10 Use Junior (17 and under) $85 Each $94
Individual Adult Season Pass (no restrictions) $450 Each $495 Individual Senior Season Pass (no restrictions) New Each $450 Individual Junior Season Pass (no restrictions) New Each $450 Administrative Fee for replacement of annual passes only $10 Each $10 Bijou Golf Course use in partnership with Boys and Girls Club No Charge No Charge No Charge
Campground
Campground Site Fee - No hook up, up to 6 people and 1
car (includes $10 infrastructure fee) $45 Per Day $47 $318,340 $334,257 Standard Cabin (includes $10 infrastructure fee) $90 Per Day $90 $0 $0 Reservation Fee (non-refundable) $10 Each $10 $32,805 $32,805 Cancellation Fee (Inside 30 days from arrival date) $50 One night rental fee $50 $7,747 $7,747
Cancellation Fee (Outside 30 days of arrival date) $10 Each $10 $1,480 $1,480 Dump Fee (charged to campers not staying in our
campground) $15 Each $15 $1,911 $1,911
Extra person $6 Each $6 $3,138 $3,138
Visitor Day Use $5 Each $5 $5 $5
Pets $2 Each $2 $5,112 $5,112
Extra Vehicle (no holding tanks) $6 Each $6 $7,650 $7,650 Motorcycles and Electric Scooters $3 Each $3 $6 $6
Late Checkout Fees $10 Per Site $10 $330 $330
Boat Ramp*
Day Use $17 Per Day $17 $36,464 $36,464
Annual Pass $138 Each $138
783
City of South Lake Tahoe
Parks and Recreation
Current Adopted
Fee
3/25/2025

PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Program
Recovery
Percentage
Fee Category Fee Description Proposed Fee Current Revenue Projected Revenue Recreation and Aquatic Center
Family Dance New
Per Person (Adults
and Children) $15 $0 $0
New Children under 2
are free Free $0 $0
Gym Sports Event New Per Team $40 $0 $0
Family Annual Pass (1 adult & 1 child) New Each $560 $0 $0 Stage Rental Fee (Gym Rental, Pool Rental, Dance Fitness, Community Room and Event Space)
New $150 $0 $0
*The Division of Boating and Waterways currently limits these fees to $17 for Day Use and $138 for an Annual Pass. 784
Planning
785
Fee Category
1 Deposit - Building Permit $1,000 Deposit n/a n/a n/a $1,000 Deposit 2 Residential Permit Processing $784 REMOVE n/a n/a n/a 3 Allocation Application Processing $784 Flat $951 82% 100% $950 Flat 8 Inclusionary Housing Plan Check Process NEW Flat $152 n/a 100% $150 Flat 13 Major General Planning Application $3,219 Flat $5,785 56% 100% $5,780 Flat 14 Minor General Planning Application $1,019 Flat $4,301 24% 100% $4,300 Flat 15 Permit Revision and/or Extension $600 Flat $1,294 46% 100% $1,290 Flat 16 Categorical Exemption $82 Flat $190 43% 100% $190 Flat 17 Negative Declaration Review $4,414 Flat n/a n/a 100% 18 Negative Declaration Preparation $7,991 Flat n/a n/a 100% 19 EIR/ EIS 25% Contract +25% n/a n/a 100%
20 Fence Permits (Commercial Only) $291 Flat $381 76% 100% $380 Flat 21 Home Occupation Permit $146 Flat $228 100% 100% $225 Flat 22 Minor Sign Review and Approval $161 Flat $457 100% 100% $455 Flat 23 Major Sign Review and Approval $400 Flat $609 100% 100% $605 Flat 24 Sign Permit Revision Application and Review $161 Flat $381 100% 100% $380 Flat 25 Locally Unique Sign Application $3,219 Flat $4,339 100% 100% $4,335 Flat 26 Minor Special Event Permit $231 Flat $1,028 100% 100% $1,025 Flat 27 Major Special Event Permit $459 Flat $1,028 100% 100% $1,025 Flat 28 Non-Profit Producer and Free Special Event $0 Free $1,028 0% 0% Free 29 Temporary Use Permit $689 Flat $913 100% 100% $910 Flat 30 Certificate of Compliance $888 Flat $913 100% 100% $910 Flat 31 Tentative Subdivision Map $5,850 Flat $6,584 100% 100% $6,580 Flat 32 Condominimization of Existing Resid Dev. $6,016 Flat $6,432 100% 100% $6,430 Flat 33 Cannabis Use Permit $5,816 Flat $5,556 100% 100% $5,555 Flat 36 Cannabis Annual Inspection Fee $2,100 Flat n/a n/a n/a $2,100 Flat 37 Cannabis Re-Inspection Fee $894 Flat n/a n/a n/a $894 Flat 38 Zoning Letter $253 Flat $343 100% 100% $340 Flat
39 Document Copying $0.10 Flat $0.10 100% 100% $0.10 Flat 40 Planning Review of Building Permits $128 Flat $152 100% 100% $150 Flat City of South Lake Tahoe
Planning PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Current Fee
Cost Per
Unit
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
To nearest $5
REMOVE
Contract +25%
Contract +25%
Contract +25%
Fee
Description
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
786
Fee Category
City of South Lake Tahoe
Planning PER UNIT ANALYSIS
Current Fee
Cost Per
Unit
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
To nearest $5
Fee
Description
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
41 Admin Fee for Cost of Collection on Leins and other
remedies 25% Admin % n/a n/a n/a 25% Admin
42 Public Notice Label Preparation $234 Flat $190 100% 100% $190 Flat 44 General Plan Amendment $8,855 dep Deposit $0 100% 100% 45 Community Plan Amendment/Area Plan/ Plan Area Statement $8,855 dep Deposit $0 100% 100% 46 Annexation Hourly Hourly $0 100% 100%
47 Mobile Vending: Location Permit $586 Flat $837 100% 100% $835 Flat 48 New Vendor Permit $177 Flat n/a n/a n/a REMOVE
49 Mobile Vending: Renewal Permit $88 Flat n/a n/a n/a REMOVE 50 Publicly Visible Art on Private Property: Public Murals $0 Free $799 100% 100% Free 51 Publicly Visible Art on Private Property: Non-Mural $257 Flat $951 100% 100% $950 Flat 52 Technology Fee $0
NEW
for Planning $31 0% 100% $31 Flat
$10,000 dep
$10,000 dep
$10,000 dep
787
Department
Police
788
1 Other Permits - New $474 each $533 89% 100% $533 each 2 Other Permits - Renewal $235 each $277 85% 100% $277 each 3 Pedicab Permit - Owner/Operator New $263 each $273 96% 100% $273 each 4 Pedicab Permit - Owner/Operator Renewal $92 each $91 101% 100% $91 each 5 Pedicab Permit - Driver New $156 each $197 79% 100% $197 each 6 Pedicab Permit - Driver Renewal $61 each $50 122% 100% $50 each 7 Sidewalk Vending Permit - New $165 each $227 73% 100% $227 each 8 Sidewalk Vending Permit - Renewal $28 each $80 35% 100% $80 each 9 Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity $459 each $458 100% 100% $458 each 10 Misdemeanor Booking $44 per booking $46 97% 100% $46 per booking 11 Fingerprinting $27 each $71 38% 100% $71 each
12 Live Scan Fingerprinting $18 each $85 21% 100% $85 each 13 Local Criminal Clearance Letter $10 each $45 22% 100% $45 each 14 Towed Vehicle Release $165 each $242 68% 100% $242 each 15 Special Police Service $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 16 DUI Incident Response - Police & Fire $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 17 Copy of Dispatch Event $0.11 per page $0.11 100% 100% $0.11 per page 18 Restitution Rate $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 19 Govt. Code Controlled Activities $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 20 Other Special Activities $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 21 Special Police Boat Service $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 22 Equipment Reimbursement $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 23 Firearm(s) Release (by appointment only) $44 per firearm $46 n/a n/a $46 per firearm 24 Ski Run Blvd. Vehicle Control $0 actual cost actual cost n/a n/a actual cost 25 Tape Duplication - Audio $23 tape $23 100% 100% $23 tape 26 Tape Duplication - Video $23 tape $23 100% 100% $23 tape 27 Crime Scene/Police Photo Reproduction (CD photo) $23 CD $23 100% 100% $23 CD 28 Taxicab Company Permit $5 annual $12 42% 100% $12 annual 29 Taxicab Vehicle Permit $5 annual per vehicle $27 19% 100% $27 annual 30 Taxicab Driver Permit $28 annual $51 55% 100% $51 annual To nearest $0.01
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
Cost per
Unit
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Description
City of South Lake Tahoe PER UNIT ANALYSIS Police Department Fee Category
Current
Fee
789
To nearest $0.01
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
Cost per
Unit
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Fee
Description
City of South Lake Tahoe PER UNIT ANALYSIS Police Department Fee Category
Current
Fee
31 False Alarm: 1st and 2nd $0 free free n/a n/a free
32 False Alarm: 3rd $50 penalty $161 n/a n/a $50 penalty 33 False Alarm: 4th $100 penalty $161 n/a n/a $100 penalty 34 False Alarm: 5th $150 penalty $161 n/a n/a $150 penalty 35 False Alarm: 6th $250 penalty $161 n/a n/a $250 penalty 36 False Alarm: Additional $25 penalty $161 n/a n/a $25 penalty 37 Non Permitted False Alarm
Penalty equal to
Pmt Fee penalty n/a n/a n/a
Penalty equal
to Pmt Fee
38 Initial Alarm Permit Application - Resident, 3 yr $41 permit $60 68% 100% $61 permit 39 Renewal Alarm Permit - Resident, 3 yr $19 permit $38 50% 100% $38 permit 40 Initial Alarm Permit Application - Business, 1 yr $41 permit $60 68% 100% $61 permit 41 Renewal Permit - Business, 1 yr $19 permit $38 50% 100% $38 permit 42 Public Safety License Fee $1,190 each $1,190 100% 100% $1,190 each 43 Public Safety License Renewal Fee $1,190 each $1,190 100% 100% $1,190 each 44 Public Safety License Amendment Fee $300 each $304 99% 100% $304 each 45 Shared Mobility Device Fee $83 per device $113 73% 100% $113 per device 46 Reposession Fee $0 State Fee $15 n/a n/a $15 Set by State 790
Fee
Comparison
Survey
791

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION
South Lake Tahoe
Current Fee
South Lake Tahoe
Proposed Fee Auburn El Dorado County Folsom Mammoth Lakes Placerville Placer County Truckee Building Permit 2% of valuation 2% of valuation
$2k val: $122
$100k val: $1,400
$1M val: $9,000

1.3% of valuation
$2k val: $138
$100k val: $1,104
$1M val: $7,360
$2k val: $225
$100k val: $2,153
$1M val: $14,495
$2k val: $95
$100k val: $1,200
$1M val: $7,500
SFD < 3,000 sq ft
$265
SFD > 3,000 sq ft
$193
Square Footage
Resid 2,500sf $2,767
Restaurant 5,000sf $
Plan Review $128/ hour $128/ hour 65% of bldg pmt fee $167/ hour 80% of bldg pmt fee included in permit $2k val: $95
$100k val: $600
$1M val: $3,300
50% of bldg pmt fee no information
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $177 $177 $1,500 + $500 each 30 day extension no information $942 $225 no information no information no information Re-check fee n/a $256 for 4th + each
additional check no information Review of 2nd corrections $247 no information $90/ hour no information $156/ hour no information Technology Fee $13/ permit $31/ permit 4% of development fee 5.65% of development fee no information no information no information 3.5% of development fees ($560 max fee) no information Appeals $380 $1,253 $1,455 $494 Owner Occupied: $264
Others: $536
Staff decision: $2,310
PC decision: $1,942 no information $774 no information
Document Printing & Copying $0.10 per page no information $0.15 per page $0.15 per page $0.10/ page (1st 10 pages free) no information no information 1st Page $2Each Add'l $1 B&W $0.10 per page
Color: $0.15/page
Notary Service $15 no information no information $15 per signature no information no information no information $15 $15 Filming Application - Basic Service $197 $164 no information 1-20 ppl: $255
21-50 ppl: $510
51+ ppl: $1,615
no information no information no information Free no information

BUILDING

CITY CLERK
792

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION
South Lake Tahoe
Current Fee
South Lake Tahoe
Proposed Fee Auburn El Dorado County Folsom Mammoth Lakes Placerville Placer County Truckee Street/ Property Abandonment $3,277 $2,855 ROW Vacation $2,075 $595 $5,750 no information $688 $2,000 deposit
Parcel Merger/ Lot Line Adjustment/ Parcel Map $128/ hour $145/ hour Resid: $1,758
Comm: $2,636
Merger: $732
LLA: $935
Merger: $340 $8,050 no information $500 Minor Land Division $1,993 $3,000 deposit Final Subdivision Map $128/ hour $145/ hour $3,342 + $63/lot $6,175 $11,500 + $144/ lot no information $3,856 + $20/lot deposit
Encroachment Permit/ Minor $766 $340 $296 + $141/year Application $167 $200 no information No dig $104 Other $336 no information $357
Encroachment Permit/ Major $766 + $1.5% of val
over $20k
$766 + $1.5% of val
over $20k
Per estimated value x
LET rate set by State
Application $167
Inspection:

On improved rd $251
Non improv rd $418
Non improved rd and
unstamped plans $585
$200 + $5/LF no information Up to $100k ENR: 2.5%
'$101k+ ENR 1.5%
ENR Cost Estimate:

Under $78k $3,927
$78k-$150k $3,927 +
5% over $78k
$150k-$250k $7,500 +
4% over $150k
ENR Cost Estimate:

Inspection:
$1-50k 6%
$50-250k 4%
Plan Check:
$1-50k 5%
$50-250k 3%
Easement Request/ Review $1,417 $4,368 no information $595 $3,450 no information $650 no information no information Administrative Fee -New License $86 $108 no information no information $29 no information no information no information no information Administrative Fee - License Renewal $42 $32 no information no information $29 no information no information no information no information Lien Release Fee $0 $372 Utility lien filing fee $90 Actual Cost assessed by Revenue Recovery
$125 no information no information
Levy on real property
$2,000
Earnings witholding
order $45
no information
Returned Check (NSF) $28 1st
$35 subsequent
$25 1st
$35 subsequent no information $25 $25 1st$35 subsequent no information no information no information $25 1st$35 subsequent

ENGINEERING

FINANCE
793

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION
South Lake Tahoe
Current Fee
South Lake Tahoe
Proposed Fee Auburn El Dorado County Folsom Mammoth Lakes Placerville Placer County Truckee Major General Planning Application $3,219 $5,780 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $8,524 Variance $6,175 Rezone Request$6,000
Variance and Zone Code
Amendment $6,000
deposit
General Plan Amend
$2,100
Zone Change $2,000
General Plan
Amendment $5,227 Annexation $11,500
Home Occupation Permit $146 $225 $364 no information $31 no information no information no information no information Temporary Use Permit $689 $910
Minor: $257 +$66/
extension
Major: $668 + $66/
extension
$1,112 $65 no information $200 no information $1,250 deposit Certificate of Compliance $888 $910 no information $1,000 deposit Revision: $2,470 no information $500 deposit Regular $600Conditinoal $1,950 $1,094 1-2 parcels $2,250
deposit
3+ parcels $3,750
deposit
Tentative Subdivision Map $5,850 $6,580 $3,213 + $60/lot $1,000 deposit $6,718 + $34/ lot $6,000 deposit $3,000 + $50/lot up to 4
lots
$30/lot over 5 lots
$1,961 deposit $10,000 deposit
Live Scan Fingerprinting $18 $85
As set by FBI.

No fee if required by
City
$17 $50 $40 + State and
DOJ fees $20 no information $20 + DOJ fees
Local Criminal Clearance Letter $10 $45 no information $30 $25 $50 no information Background Clearance Letter $33
Towed Vehicle Release $165 $242 no information $100 admin fee to contest abatement $200 $150 $241 no information $199
Taxicab Driver Permit $28/year $51/year no information $32/ license no information $45 per vehicle $60 no information $68 Renewal Alarm Permit - Business $19/year 38/year $24 $25 $20 no information $85 no information no information

PLANNING

POLICE DEPARTMENT
794
795
Appendix A
Adopted Recreation and Aquatic
Center Fee Schedule
796
Resolution 2025-094 November 4, 2025 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2025-094
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
November 4, 2025
Adopting the Schedule of Fees and Charges for the New Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center

BACKGROUND
A. User fees in California are required to conform to the California Constitution including Proposition 26 and statutory requirements including Government Code Sections 66014 through 66018. 5. User fees imposed to provide specific services, to cover reasonable regulatory costs to issue licenses and permits, for entrance to or use of city property, and fines for violating the City Code are generally excluded from the definition of "tax" under Proposition 26. Section 1 (e) of article XIIIC of the California Constitution describes these exceptions.

B. The City of South Lake Tahoe Finance Department periodically performs a comprehensive citywide review and evaluation of user fees and charges to ensure the City is accurately accounting for the total cost to provide fee-related services. The last User Fee Study was performed and approved by City Council in 2015.

C. The Finance Department determined it was necessary to update the study and engage the services of a qualified professional firm experienced in cost recovery and economic analysis to conduct a new, comprehensive study. The primary objective is to prepare a citywide costbased user fee study that calculates the full (100%) cost of providing specific City services and provides recommended fees for each applicable service, while also ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.

D. On April 22, 2025, City Council approved a Resolution for Government Consulting Partners GCP) to work with the City for a comprehensive review and evaluation of citywide user fees.

This includes developing a new fee structure for the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center.

E. This portion of the user fee study was performed under the general direction Parks & Recreation staff to provide a high-level cost analysis of revenue to costs as it relates to fees for services and programs, establishes fees for new services that will be offered in the new center and to provide a comparison survey to help guide recommendations.

F. The proposed fees were presented to the Parks & Recreation Commission on August 20, 2025, for their review.
797
Resolution 2025-094 November 4, 2025 Page 2 of 2
G. These fees are proposed for adoption now so that pass products, rentals and program registration can begin to be sold prior to opening the new center. The existing fees for the Recreation & Swim Complex will remain in place until the new center opens so that it can continue operations.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Adopts the new fee amounts according to the implementation dates as set forth in the applicable codes and all fees and charges as presented in the new Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center Master Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit " A." Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on November 4, 2025 by the following vote: Yes: Bass, Jinkens, Roberts
No: Robbins Date: _________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

Susan Blankenship ( Nov 5, 2025 13:45: 00 PST)
Cody Bass ( Nov 5, 2025 18: 25: 52 PST)
Nov 5, 2025
798
Gym Rentals
Full (2 Courts) Hourly $
250
1/ 2 Gym (1 Court) Hourly $
125
1/ 4 (1/ 2 Court) Hourly $
65 Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour Per Staff $ 48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
Meeting Room Rentals
Rental Per Hour $ 25
Non Fee No Charge No Charge
Senior Services Meetings No Charge No Charge
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Community Room Rentals
Rental Hourly $ 55
Recognized Local Youth Sport Organizations May Have Free Use of Meeting Rooms in the Recreation & Aquatics Center No Charge No Charge Youth Organization Meetings Hourly $ 15
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Senior Services Meetings No Charge No Charge
New Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center
Fee Description Unit Proposed Fee
ResidentProposed Non- Fee
799
Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour Per Staff $ 48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
Commercial Kitchen Rental
Commercial Kitchen Rental Hourly $ 50
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour Per Staff $ 48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
Dance/ Fitness Room Rental
Rental Hourly $ 55
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Senior Services Meetings No Charge No Charge
Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour Per Staff $ 48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
800
Event Space Rentals
Event Space Weekday Mon-Thurs $/ hr.$ 350
Event Space Weekend Fri -Sun $/ hr.$ 450
Event Space After Hours Per hour $ 100
Audio Video Ad On Flat Fee $ 150
Event Space Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour (2 hour minimum)$ 48 Ceremony Chair Package $ 7-$9 per chair comps $ 8 per chair Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
Pool Rental
Swimming Pool Rental Rate Hourly $ 85
Lap Pool Rental (Full) Hourly $ 85
Lap Pool Rental (1/ 2 pool) Hourly $ 45
Lap Lane Rental (1 Lane) Hourly $ 15
Play Pool Rental Hourly $ 95
Lifeguard Hourly Rate (Rental) Hourly Actual cost at fully burdened rate
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour Per Staff $ 48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
801
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
Party Room
Rental Weekday Mon-Thurs $/ hr.$ 40
Rental Weekend Fri -Sun $/ hr.$ 50
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Facility Rental Setup Fee Per Hour Per Staff $ 48
Group Rentals May Be Subject to $500 minimum or $1,500
Maximum Security Deposit and/ or Cleaning Fees at the Discretion of the City of South Lake Tahoe
500 (Security Deposit)$ 500 Minimum or
1,500 Maximum
Group Rentals May Be Subject to a Minimum of $15 Cancellation Fee and Maximum of $50 at the Discretion of City of South Lake Tahoe
15 (Cancellation Fee)$ 15 Minimum or
50 Maximum
Late Payment Penalty Fee 10% of total rental fee due 10% of total rental fee due
Party Packages
Mini Mountain Movers Party Package Session Rental $ 225 Batting Cages 2 Hour Party $ 300
Rockwall 1 Hour Party $ 200
Obstacle Course Pool Add On Per Event $ 75
Pool Party Package Session Rental $ 200
Aquatics
Obstacle Course Per Participant $ 5 plus facility drop
in fee
Lifeguard Certification Course Per Participant $ 235
Water Safety Instructor Certification Course Per Participant $ 299 Junior Lifeguards Per Participant Per 4 week
Session $ 200
Mini Lifeguards Per Participant Per 4 week
Session $ 185
802
Swim Team Per Participant Per
Month/ Session $ 120
Development Swim Team Per Participant Per
Month/ Session $ 105
Aquatics Special Class ( Ex Log Rolling) Per Participant Per Class $ 7 Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Classess 30 minutes Each $ 10 Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Classess 60 minutes Each $ 20 Float Fit Aquatics Fitness Classess 90 minutes Each $ 30 Locker Rental Per month $ 20
Swimming Programs
H2O Exercise: Adult 18-54 years Each $ 8 $ 10
H2O Exercise: Senior or Permanent Disability Each $ 6 $ 8 H2O Exercise: Adult 18-54 years - 10 Use Pass Each $ 60 $ 75 H2O Exercise: Senior or Perm Disability - 10 Use Pass Each $ 50 $ 65 H2O Exercise: Individual Annual Pass Each $ 295 $ 369
Swimming Lessons ( Group) 8 Class Session Each $ 50
Swimming Lessons ( Group) 6 Class Session Each $ 40
Swimming Lessons ( Group) 4 Class Session Each $ 30
Private Lessons ( 25 minutes) 1 Student Each $ 33
Private Lessons ( 25 minutes) 2 Students Each $ 45
Private Lessons ( 25 minutes) 3 Students Each $ 55
Master Swim Drop In Each $ 10 $ 12
Master Swim Session 10 Use Punch Card Each $ 70 $ 85
Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Facility Day Use: Includes Gym, Natatorium, Exercise Room, Walking Track Adult: 18-54 Year Each $ 10 $ 15
803
Youth: 18 Years and Under Each $ 8 $ 12
Senior 55 Years and Up or Permanent Disability Each $ 8 $ 12 Public Shower Adult/ Discount for Senior, Disabled, and Youth Each $ 3/$2 Daily Day Rate for Medi-Cal, WIC , and Veteran Participants Adult: 18 and Over Each $ 3
Youth: 18 Years and Under Each $ 2
Facility Multi-Use Day Passes: Includes Gym, Natatorium, Exercise Room, Walking Track Adult - 10 use punch card Each $ 80 $ 100
Adult - Monthly Each $ 65 $ 81
Adult - 90 Day (City Employees Only) Each $ 45
Senior or Permanent Disability - 10 use punch card Each $ 65 $ 81 Senior or Permanent Disability - Monthly Each $ 50 $ 63 Children 3 years and Under Are Free with a Paying Adult for Recreation Drop in only Each
Youth -10 use punch card Each $ 65 $ 81
Youth Monthly Each $ 50 $ 63
Couple Annual Pass Each $ 690 $ 863
Individual Annual Pass Each $ 480 $ 600
Youth Annual Pass Each $ 300 $ 375
Youth Annual Pass for GPA of 3.5 or higher (Resident Only - Ages 14-17) Each $ 150
Senior Annual Pass Each $ 300 $ 375
10% off Annual pass is purchased between January 1, 2026 - March 31, 2026
10% off Annual pass
is purchased
between 1/ 1/ 2026 -
3/ 31/ 2026
Family Annual Pass ( 2 adults + 2 children): Includes 20% discount on party packages and access to special member days Each $ 825 $ 1,031 804
Family Annual Pass - Each Additional Adult Each Additional Adult $ 345 $ 431 Family Annual Pass - Each Additional Senior or Child Each Additional Senior or Child $ 150 $ 188 Administrative Fee for replacement of annual passes only Each $ 10 Non-Profit Organizations 25% Off Base Rate 25% Off Base Rate Recreation Add Ons
Batting Cages Per Participant $ 5 plus facility drop
in fee
Batting Cages - 10 punch card Each $ 100 includes drop
in fee
Rockwall Per Participant $ 5 plus facility drop
in fee
Rockwall - 10 punch card Each $ 100 includes drop
in fee
Golf Simulator Hourly $ 50
Rockwall Hourly $ 150
Rec Center Special Events
Puzzle Event Per team $ 40
Family Dance Per Participant $ 15
Pickleball Tournament Per Team $ 75
Family Game Night Part of Season Pass No Extra Charge
Pool Special Events Per Participant $ 15
Pickleball Mixer Per Participant $ 25
Adult Programs
Adult Volleyball League Team Per Season Participant $ 400 Adult Volleyball League Individual Per Season Participant $ 66 Adult Basketball League Team Per Season Participant $ 550 Adult Basketball League Individual Per Season Participant $ 75 Pickleball Clinic Adults Per Participant Per Session $ 30 805
Pickleball Clinic Youth Per Participant Per Session $ 25 Senior Games Per Participant Per Event $ 10
Personal Training Per Participant Per Hour $ 60 $ 75
Adult Cornhole League Individual Per Season Per Team $ 50 Adult Fitness Classes 30 minutes Each $ 10 $ 12
Adult Fitness Classes 60 minutes Each $ 15 $ 18
Adult Fitness Classes 90 minutes Each $ 20 $ 25
Late Payment Registration for league play 10% increase to base fee 10% increase to base fee
Youth and Teens
Parents Night Out Per Participant $ 40
Kid's Summer Day Camp Each $ 40 $ 50
Kid's Summer Day Camp (Weekly Fee) Each $ 150 $ 188
Kid's Summer Day Camp Multi-Child Discount 10% Off Base Fee 10% Off Base Fee Youth Basketball League Per Season Participant $ 65
Youth Flag Football League Per Season Participant $ 95
Youth Street Hockey Per Season Participant $ 70
After School Enrichment Program Per Season Participant $ 120 Tiny Tots Sports League Per Season Participant $ 60
Youth Volleyball League Per Season Participant $ 75
Youth Soccer League Per Season Participant $ 65
Late Payment Registration for league play 10% increase to base fee 10% increase to base fee
806
Res 2025-094 Update to Master Fee Schedule
for New Rec Center
Final Audit Report 2025- 11-06
Created: 2025- 11-05
By: Michelle Davis ( medavis@cityofslt. gov)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAFJ0EW1Z67i6rYnIRFcQ7x3Ircvjuiyy5 Res 2025-094 Update to Master Fee Schedule for New Rec Ce nter" History
Document created by Michelle Davis ([email protected]) 2025- 11- 05 - 9:30:04 PM GMT
Document emailed to Susan Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2025- 11- 05 - 9:30:09 PM GMT
Email viewed by Susan Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. gov) 2025- 11- 05 - 9:44:49 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Susan Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025- 11-05 - 9:45:00 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2025- 11- 05 - 9:45:02 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2025- 11- 06 - 2:25:08 AM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Cody Bass 2025- 11- 06 - 2:25:50 AM GMT
Document e-signed by Cody Bass ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2025- 11-06 - 2:25:52 AM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2025- 11- 06 - 2:25:52 AM GMT
807
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Agenda Item #:14
Agenda Item: Possible Re-Use of Recreation and Swim Complex Executive Summary: At the City Council meeting on January 27, 2026, Councilmember Jinkens (seconded by Councilmember Roberts) requested that an item be brought back at a future meeting to discuss potential re-use of the Recreation and Swim Complex and creation of an ad-hoc subcommittee to discuss this possibility with El Dorado County. The 56 Acres Agreement with El Dorado County requires demolition of the Recreation and Swim Complex by 2037; however there are other challenges with continuing to keep the facility open and in operation. The most significant challenge is the cost, estimated at $775,000 per year for maintenance and utilities for the aging facility. If City Council desires to keep the facility open for use by community groups, staff recommends a rental rate to include full cost recovery for this unbudgeted expense. It is important to note that low- and no- cost rentals are available at the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center under the fee schedule for that facility approved by City Council on November 4, 2025.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Receive report and either: (1) Pass a Motion directing staff to explore feasibility and cost of keeping existing Recreation and Swim Complex open, to include inquiring whether any community groups want to rent space in the existing Recreation and Swim Center at full cost recovery and discussing permit requirements and mitigation fee costs with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; or (2) take no action.

Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - Rec Center Use.docx
02-Existing Conditions Report.pdf
03 - 56 Acres Agreement with El Dorado County.pdf
04 - Ground Lease.pdf
05 - 56-Acres Master Plan.pdf
06 - TRPA Permit.pdf
808
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 24, 2026
Title: Possible Re-Use of Recreation and Swim Complex
Location: 1180 Rufus Allen Blvd.

Responsible Staff Members: Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager (530) 542-6000 Heather Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046
Background: At the City Council meeting on January 27, 2026, Councilmember Jinkens (seconded by Councilmember Roberts) requested that an item be brought back at a future meeting to discuss potential re-use of the Recreation and Swim Complex and creation of an adhoc subcommittee to discuss this possibility with El Dorado County.

On August 20, 2019, City Council received a report regarding the history of decisions regarding the new recreation center project including previous analysis regarding renovation and expansion of the existing facility, originally built in 1975, versus building a new facility. City Council considered a draft Existing Conditions Assessment prepared by architect Williams + Paddon in 2016. At that meeting, City Council directed staff to order a more detailed conditions assessment report, which was prepared by Perkins & Will and presented to City Council on February 11, 2020.

This condition assessment is included in the agenda packet. It found that the building is structurally sound but that mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems had exceeded their life span and were in need of replacement. The condition assessment also identified areas of noncompliance with ADA accessibility codes, which would be required to be brought into compliance with the needed renovations. Additionally, the condition assessment included a hazardous materials assessment which identified the existence of asbestos and lead that would need to be remediated if renovations are made. Based on the assessment, which estimated that renovation of the existing facility would be nearly equivalent to the cost to build a new facility, City Council directed staff to continue with planning and design of the new recreation center on the location where it has been constructed.

During this time, staff was also negotiating the 56 Acres Agreement with El Dorado County, which City Council and the County Board of Supervisors both approved on January 18, 2022. This agreement included a property swap resulting in City ownership of the location where the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center is located and County ownership of the property where the existing Recreation and Swim Complex is located. The property swap was completed in July 2022 so that construction on the new facility could begin. At that time, in implementation of the 56 Acres Agreement, the City and County entered into a 50-year Ground Lease for the City to lease from the County certain County-owned property on the 56 Acres including the existing Recreation and Swim Complex site. Section 2.1 of the Ground Lease gives the City the “sole authority over the development, operation and use of the Leased Property” and 809
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 3
“the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the Leased Property.” Section 1.2 of the Ground Lease requires the City to demolish the existing recreation center upon completion of the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center pursuant to the terms of the 56 Acres Agreement, Section 2(b) of which requires that demolition to occur at the City’s sole expense and to the County’s satisfaction no later than February 22, 2037. There is a deed restriction on the Leased Property that it “shall be used solely and exclusively for public use” and prohibiting “[p]rivate residential, commercial, or industrial uses.” Concurrently with the approval of the 56 Acres Agreement, on January 18, 2022, the City Council approved the 56 Acres Master Plan after a multi-year public process. The 56 Acres Master Plan and its associated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration analyzed the project to include demolition of the existing Recreation and Swim Complex and the Master Plan shows that area as undeveloped green space.

The new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center required a permit from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA). Special Condition 8 of the TRPA permit, issued on April 28, 2022, requires that prior to opening the new facility, the City “shall discontinue all use of the existing swim and recreation center,” and requires that “[a]ny proposed future use of the existing swim and recreation center building is contingent upon review and approval of a TRPA Change in Operation application.” This condition resulted in a lower mobility mitigation fee ($16,197.40) than would have otherwise been due if both facilities were to remain open. Special Condition F of the TRPA permit requires the City to mitigate a portion or all of the 102,651 square feet of excess land coverage by either removing coverage within Hydrologic Transfer Area 4 – South Stateline or by submitting an excess coverage mitigation fee. Demolishing the 34,000-square-foot Recreation and Swim Complex would count towards this mitigation.

Issue and Discussion: There are some significant challenges to maintaining the existing Recreation and Swim Complex in operation after the opening of the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center. First, based on prior City Council decisions, staff has been working towards decommissioning and demolition of the Recreation and Swim Complex.

Significant funds would be needed to keep the facility open and operational for continued use.

Annual maintenance is about $391,000, and annual utility costs are approximately $180,000.

Even without keeping the pool in operation and only having the meeting rooms and gymnasium space available for rent by community groups, these ongoing costs would be substantial.

Additionally, the facility has been compromised by its age and snow loading, and has significant deferred maintenance in major building systems that would need to be addressed to keep it operational at an estimated cost of $204,000 per year. To keep the facility open for more than a couple of years, major repairs would be needed, to include a roof reinforcement/replacement estimated at $3,400,000, additional exterior hardening (windows, doors, paint, and siding to be replaced with fire resistant material) at $3,400,000, and if the pool were to continue in use, $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 is likely to be needed to demo and rebuild the area and replace the mechanical systems. Thus, even without the major repairs, the estimated annual cost to keep the Recreation and Swim Center open is $775,000. By comparison, the planned demolition is estimated at a one-time cost of $2,100,000.

Second, a TRPA Change in Operation permit would be needed to continue use of the existing Recreation and Swim Complex. It is likely that this change would trigger additional mobility mitigation fees, at an unknown cost to the City.
810
Council Agenda Report- March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Third, the County required demolition of the existing Recreation and Swim Complex by 2037 as a condition of the 56 Acres Agreement. Keeping the facility in operation beyond that date would require renegotiating and amending the agreement with the County.

Under current regulatory approvals and agreements, the City Council could direct staff to explore the feasibility of keeping the existing Recreation and Swim complex operational and available for lease by community groups in the short term. The estimated annual cost to keep the building operational, however, is $775,000, and if the building is open for more than a few years major repairs will be needed that are estimated to cost $6,800,000 (excluding the pool repairs). If City Council desires to keep the facility in operation, staff recommends passing on these costs to the lessee(s) because these costs are not covered by the current City budget. It is uncertain that local community groups would be interested in leasing this space at full cost recovery, so this may not be a feasible option.

It is important to note that space is available for non-profit groups at the new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center at the City Council-approved fee of $18.75/hour for meeting rooms and $41.25/hour for the community room. Meeting rooms are available for senior services meetings at no charge. The community room is also available to youth organizations for $15/hour and for senior services meetings and youth sports organizations at no charge.

Financial Implications: Keeping the existing Recreation and Swim Center open and operational is estimated to cost $775,000 per year. If the facility were to be kept open for more than a few years, major repairs would be needed to the roof and exterior, estimated at $6,800,000. Further, the required TRPA Change in Operation permit may trigger additional mobility mitigation fees in addition to the $16,197.40 already paid, in an amount unknown at this time, and not demolishing the existing Recreation and Swim Center would require the City to find an additional 34,000 square feet of coverage to retire or pay an additional coverage mitigation fee of $289,000 (8.50 x. 34,000 sq. ft.). By contrast, the planned demolition of the facility is estimated at $2,100,000.

Environmental Considerations: Maintaining the current Recreation and Swim Complex in operation in the short term is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines 15301 (Existing Facilities). However, keeping it in operation indefinitely likely would require an update to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 56 Acres Master Plan, adopted by City Council on January 18, 2022.

Policy Implications: 2025-2030 Strategic Plan Action 7.1 states “Complete the new Recreation and Swim Complex and maintain the current complex in the meantime.” Staff has accomplished this goal. Keeping the current complex in operation after completion of the new facility is beyond the scope of the current strategic plan. 811
Perkins&Will
South Lake Tahoe Recreation Swim Center
Existing Building Conditional Assessment
Final Report
January 23, 2020

812
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Section 1: Background..........................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose ..............................................................................................................................................................................4 Background .......................................................................................................................................................................4 Methodology.....................................................................................................................................................................5 Section 2: Cost Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................6 Cost Summary of Existing Building Renovation.............................................................................................................6 Cost Summary of New Recreation Center......................................................................................................................7 Cost Estimate for Existing Recreation Center Renovation ............................................................................................8 Cost Estimate assumptions ............................................................................................................................................18 Section 3: Building Assessment ........................................................................................................................................21 Code Compliance Assessment.......................................................................................................................................22 Compliance Options for existing building:...................................................................................................................23 Impacts on Building Renovation and Recommendations:..........................................................................................23 Existing and Accessibility Analysis.................................................................................................................................24 Section 4: Hazardous Materials Assessment..................................................................................................................28 Hazardous Materials Assessment .................................................................................................................................28 Impacts on Building Renovation:...................................................................................................................................29 Design Criteria.................................................................................................................................................................30 Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................................33 Section 6: Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Assessment .......................................................................................35 Observations ...................................................................................................................................................................35 Findings and Potential Issues.........................................................................................................................................37 Recommendations and Code Requirements ...............................................................................................................38 813
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following conditional assessment of the existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Center was conducted to identify the scope of work necessary to fully renovate the existing center, and to evaluate the cost of those improvements.

The assessment was conducted by Perkins&Will and Ward Young Architects, along with Sugarpine Engineering, Gabbart and Woods Engineering and DFH Cost Consulting. The consultant team conducted on-site visual assessment on December 5, 2019, and along with existing building documentation, prepared the following analysis.

The purpose of this assessment was to identify the cost difference between renovation of the existing center, and construction of a completely new center, on the current site, or another nearby location (undetermined). The previous planning process for the recreation center conducted on 2017 identified priority needs for a new center.

The cost estimates for the proposed new center were used for comparative purposes. Because many of the requested building components cannot fit within the existing center, the cost analysis assumes that the pool, gymnasium and running track would be newly cons tructed additions to the existing center.

Because the building never went through a major renovation since it’s construction in 1975, many of the original construction systems and materials are still in place. This brings a range of challenges from longevity, deterioration, code compliance, hazardous materials, and systems reaching the end of their useable life. If the building were to undergo a major renovation and addition, all of the building components and systems would require upgrades to current code and accessibility standards, as well as abatement of hazardous materials (asbestos) based on the report conducted by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc.

The total estimated construction cost of the existing 22,213 square feet of building is $8,827,931. For the purposes of comparison, new construction of similar building components (including fitness spaces, multiuse rooms, offices, support areas) of approximately 23,000 square feet would cost an estimated $11,621,000. This equates to a cost differential of $2,793,069 between new and renovated construction for similar building area and components. These figures all represent direct construction costs, and do not included site construction, asbestos abatement, design and engineering fees, equipment or other project development costs. 814
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |4
SECTION 1:BACKGROUND
Purpose
The City of South Lake Tahoe is faced with a decision to either build a new community recreation center on the current recreation and swim center site, or another potential site, or to renovate and expand the current recreation and pool building to accomplish a similar intent. The purpose of this report is to conduct a conditional assessment of the existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Swim Center to determine the cost and viability of renovating this structure to serve the long-term recreational needs of the community.

It is the purpose of this assessment to identify not only the necessary remediation and replacement, but to specifically identify the cost impact of those improvements. Depending on the type of use, and the anticipated scope of renovation, there are tiers of improvements that are necessary. The following types of use will determine the extent of the necessary remediation.
1) Do nothing
The existing building could continue in its current use and continue to function as a community center but minimal physical changes could occur without triggering code and accessibility improvements. The building and systems are still nearing their useable life, and would soon require significant remediation, but if no changes in use are proposed, no upgrades are specifically required. As long as no demolition disrupts the asbestos materials, they can remain in place. 2) Cosmetic improvements only
The building could also serve other similar uses and receive only cosmetic improvements such as paint and finishes installed over existing materials. Similar to option 1, only minimal changes could occur without triggering required upgrades. As long as no demolition disrupts the asbestos materials, they can remain in place.
3) Renovation/Addition
Completely renovate the existing building, and construct additions for the components that cannot fit in the existing structure including the new indoor pool, gymnasium and running track. The scope of the renovations assumes both remediation to current building code and accessibility standards, as well as replacement of materials and systems that are deteriorating or nearing the end of their usable life. The abatement of all asbestos is assumed as part of this option. The cost of this option is provided in Section 2 of this report.
4) Demolish and reconstruct a new facility
The entire building could also be demolished and reconstructed on either the current site, or another site. The cost of asbestos abatement would still be incurred to demolish the existing structure. The cost of new construction is also included in in Section 2 of this report.

Background
The existing structure was built in 1975, with limited improvements and regular ongoing maintenance over the life of the building. Because the building never went through a major renovation, many of the original construction systems and materials are still in place. This brings a range of challenges from longevity, deterioration, code compliance, hazardous materials, and systems reaching the end of their useable life.

The current building is a single-story structure constructed primarily of glu-laminated timber framing, stud framed interior and exterior walls, clad in wood shake shingles. The total building area is approximately 32,017 square feet. The pool complex is comprised of 11,360 square feet, surrounded by an exterior wall enclosure, and 815
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |5
an air-supported fabric roof structure covered seasonally. The remaining 20,657 square feet of building contains offices, classrooms, locker rooms, a gymnasium and other support areas for storage and building systems.

The existing site is asphalt paved with a large number of evergreen trees throughout the lot. Although the parking would likely be modified with a major addition renovation, the scope and cost of this work was not part of this study.

Methodology
The findings of this report are based on review of the existing building drawings, engineering judgment, visual observation, review of the works of others, and engineering experience. Items were evaluated to reasonable accuracy based on available information, and one visual review of the facility , and on-site visual inspection conducted on December 5, 2019. Many of the findings could be subject to interpretation and differing opinion could impact the recommendations and cost impacts, but the findings represent an objective professional opinion of the building conditions.

Documents
The report was created using available information in documents provided by the City. For the purposes of this initial study, the accuracy and detail contained in the documents is sufficient to draw the necessary conclusions.

All recommendations based on the information contained in these documents in subject to the validity of the content, and should be independently verified prior to any further design or construction.

The following documents were referenced as part of this report:
• Existing building construction documents by Clarence Feliciano and Schuler L. Jeffries AIA & Associates dated February 7, 1974
• Existing Conditions Assessment Report by Williams + Paddon Architects and Planners dated March 2016 • Needs Assessment Study: Swimming Pool by Aquatic Design Group dated March 2016 • Asbestos Renovation Survey by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc. dated September 17, 2019 • Lead Sampling Survey by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc. dated September 17, 2019 816
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |6
SECTION 2: COST ANALYSIS
Cost Summary of Existing Building Renovation
Building Component Area (gross sf) Construction Cost
Existing Building Renovation Cost 22,213 $8,827,931
(Includes Fitness, Community, Administration and Support Spaces) New Pool Complex Construction: 19,000 $9,660,000
New Gymnasium and Running Track Construction: 24,000 $6,281,000 Construction Cost of Renovation and Addition Recreation Center 65,213 $24,768,931 Cost Difference of renovation/addition versus newly constructed recreation center Renovation addition recreation center 65,213 $24,768,931 New recreation center 66,000 $27,562,000
Cost Difference -($ 2,793,069)
Diagram of Conceptual Renovation and Addition Plan
817
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |7
Cost Summary of New Recreation Center
Building Component Area Total Cost
Fitness, Community, Administration and Support Spaces 23,000 $11,621,000 New Pool Complex Construction: 19,000 $9,660,000
New Gymnasium and Running Track Construction: 24,000 $6,281,000 Total Construction Cost of New Recreation Center Building 66,000 $27,562,000 818
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |8
Cost Estimate for Existing Recreation Center Renovation NOTE: This cost estimate is preliminary in nature, based on the conceptual scope of work descriptions prepared by Perkins & Will and its consultants. It is subject to variation as the details of the design are finalized, as well as timing, market conditions, and phasing.

UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANT. UOM COST COST

COMMENTS /

ASSUMPTIONS
Note: The following estimate is based upon the assumption that an abatement contractor will have removed All asbestos and lead containing materials prior to the start of this work. This includes wood shakes, Redwood siding, and underlayment on roofs and exterior walls, all drywall on walls and ceilings, all Asbestos-containing floor coverings and mastic, fire doors, and ceramic wall tile.

GENERAL ITEMS
Barricades / Fences / Temp. Signs Excluded
Assumed to be with new
construction
General Conditions / Supervision 10 MO $60,000.00 $600,000 Small trailer in staging
area
Storage Units for Salvaged Materials 18 MO $500.00 $9,000 Layout of Demolition / Finish Work 26 WKS $3,400.00 $88,400 Full time layout /
supervision of demolition
Gravel for Temp Parking / Restore Excluded
Staging area assumed to
be with sitework
Subtotal of General Items $697,400

SITE CLEARING AND DEMOLITION
Assume this work is part of the new building project
DEMOLITION OF POOL AND STRUCTURE AND SEPARATION OF COLUMN LINE 22 WALL Disconnect Utilities to Pool
Excavate/Cut/Cap U.G. Water Lines 3 EA $500.00 $1,500
Excavate/Cut/Cap Sewer Main 4 EA $500.00 $2,000
Cut/Remove Sewer Vent Lines 4 EA $500.00 $2,000
Excavate/Cut/Cap Gas Main 1 EA $500.00 $500
Excavate and Remove UG Piping 702 LF $25.00 $17,550
Disconnect Electrical Services 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Remove Gallery Walkway and Corbels at Column Line 22 Wall Assumes C.L. 22 wall can
remain as is and
Fire Extinguisher Cabinets 2 EA $150.00 $300
becomes a new interior
wall at new pool
Drinking Fountains in CMU Chase 2 EA $500.00 $1,000
Hose Bibbs in CMU Chase 2 EA $500.00 $1,000
819
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |9
CMU Chases at Drinking Fountains 43 SF $5.00 $214
Misc. Wall Mounted Items1 LS $500.00 $500
Lobby Entry Doors2 EA $150.00 $300
Salvage Sight Rail Wood Pieces2 EA $100.00 $200
Lobby Entry Hollow Metal Frame 103 SF $5.00 $514
Sloped Plaster Soffit at Lobby Entry 60 SF $10.00 $600
Soffit Framing at Lobby Entry 40 SF $5.00 $200
Plywood Diaphragm at Lobby Entry 59 SF $5.00 $294
Wall and Framing at Lobby Entry 116 SF $3.50 $406
Glass and Frames at Room 48 81 SF $5.00 $404
Countertop / Supports in Room 487 LF $50.00 $350
Sawcut Conc. Knee wall at Room 487 VF $50.00 $350
Remove Conc. Knee wall at Room 48 44 SF $5.00 $222
Sawcut Slab on Grade in Office 487 LF $50.00 $350
Revolving Door / Framing at Air Lock1 EA $500.00 $500
Emergency Pool Exit Door / Frame1 EA $250.00 $250
Cut Wall Framing Above Exit Door8 VF $50.00 $400
Sawcut 6" Upper Wall at Emerg. Exit5 VF$75.00 $375
Sawcut CMU Wall at Emergency Exit2 VF $100.00 $200
Hand Excavate at Foundation1 LS $250.00 $250
Sawcut 10" Fdn Wall at Emerg. Exit3 VF $100.00 $300
Sawcut 12"Footing at Emergency Exit3 LF $125.00 $375
Cut Roof and Framing at C. L. 22 & B 11 LF $50.00 $550
Sawcut 6" Upper Wall at 22 & B5 VF $75.00 $375
Hand Excavate at Planter1 LS $50.00 $50
Sawcut CMU Planter Wall3 VF $75.00 $225
Sawcut 12" Planter Grade Beam4 VF $125.00 $500
Sawcut 12" Planter Slab3 LF $100.00 $300
Sawcut Entry Walk at Planter7 LF $50.00 $350
Hand Excavate at Foundation1 LS $250.00 $250
Sawcut 10" Fdn Wall at 22 & B3 VF $100.00 $300
Sawcut 12"Footing at 22 & B3 LF $125.00 $375
Shore Gallery Deck During Sawcuts 628 SF $20.00 $12,560 Sawcut Pool Gallery Deck at CL 22 115 LF $75.00 $8,625
Sawcut Deck Support Beams - 12"4 VF $200.00 $800
Sawcut Deck Support Corbels - 16" 32 VF $200.00 $6,400
Pool Demolition
Disconnect Electrical Connections1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Disconnect Plumbing1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Pool Equipment and Exposed Piping1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 Wood Roof Structure 3030 SF $3.00 $9,090
Wood Wall Structures 1653 SF $2.00 $3,306
Gallery Deck and Supporting Walls 4734 SF $15.00 $71,010 Pool Deck and Foundations 8722 SF $5.00 $43,610
Pool Shell and Buried Piping 4069 SF$10.00 $40,690
820
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |10
Close Existing Openings in Column Line 22 Wall
Assume single pane
aluminum storefront
At North End of Lobby 103 SF $65.00 $6,678
Reinstall Salvaged Sight Rail Pieces 2 EA $150.00 $300
At Office Room 48 48 SF $65.00 $3,109
Close opening at
removed Counting Area
At Air Lock Door 46 SF $65.00 $2,961
Replace with storefront
and two doors
Storefront Doors 4 EA $3,500.00 $14,000 Excludes panic hardware Add Shear Reinforcement to Column Line 22 CMU Walls Excluded Assume existing wall is
sufficient
Subtotal of Pool Demolition and Separation at Column Line 22 $292,317

EXTERIOR ENVELOPE MODIFICATIONS
Remove Wood Shake Roofing, Wall Siding, and Underlayment Excluded Separate budget Exterior Demolition
Built-up Flat Roofing
Multi-Use Area 4740 SF $3.00 $14,220
Fan Room 102 833 SF $3.00 $2,499
Central Area 10630 SF $3.00 $31,890
Damaged 3/4" Plywood Sheathing 1620 SF $1.50 $2,430
Assume 10% of flat roof
area
Sheet Metal Roofing at Multi-Use
At Fan Room Above Multi-Use 106 SF $7.50 $792
Above Column Line 22 Wall 162 SF $7.50 $1,215
Remove Skylights and Metal Frames
Wood trim at tops of
walls to remain
Central Area 18 EA $225.00 $4,050
North Slope by Pool Gallery 18 EA $200.00 $3,600
Temporary Opening Protection 738 SF $5.00 $3,690
Gypsum Sheathing at Flat Soffits
To allow access for
sprayed insulation
Sloped Soffits Excluded
Assume existing to
remain
Sloped Soffit at Multi-Use 144 SF $2.00 $288 Along south wall Flat Soffit 1602 SF $0.75 $1,202
Flat Soffit at Multi-Use Exit Doors 55 SF $2.00 $110
Flat Soffits at Building Entries 430 SF $1.50 $645
At Gable Ends 41 SF $4.00 $164
Remove Exterior Doors and Windows (Except Column Line 22) Salvage Interior Wood Trim Pieces 487 LF $2.50 $1,218
Type 2 Windows - 9 EA 326 SF $5.00 $1,631
Type 3 Windows - 12 EA 440 SF $5.00 $2,199
Type 5 Window - 1 EA 36 SF $5.00 $178
Hollow Metal Entry Doors/Closers 8 EA $100.00 $800
Salvage Sight Rail Wood Pieces 8 EA $100.00 $800
821
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |11
Entry Hollow Metal Frames - 4 EA 405 SF $5.00 $2,024
Clean Floor Closer Recesses 8 EA $30.00 $240
Hollow Metal Exit Doors 11 EA $75.00 $825
Hollow Metal Single Door Frames 3 EA $150.00 $450
Hollow Metal Double Door Frames 4 EA $150.00 $600
Temporary Closures in Exterior 1456 SF $2.50 $3,641
To protect interior from
weather
Clean Out Space Between Planters and Wall Sheathing
Assume planters to
remain in place
Salvage Cap Block at Wood Walls 187 LF $6.00 $1,122 Clean for reuse Vacuum Out Sand Filler at Walls 74 CF $35.00 $2,592
Sand in space between
planter & sheathing
Repair Waterproofing at Planters Excluded
Assume waterproofing is
intact
Replace Roofing
Repl. 3/4" Plywood Roof Sheathing 1620 SF $5.00 $8,102
Where removed at
damaged areas
Membrane Roofing with Perimeter Flashings, Penetration Flashings, and R-30 Insulation Raise Roof Drain Elevations 22 EA $800.00 $17,600
Increase Size of Roof Drain Piping 445 LF $70.00 $31,150 Remove and replace
with 1" larger pipe
Additional Overflow Drains 5 EA $1,500.00 $7,500
Multi-Use Area 4740 SF $15.00 $71,100
Fan Room 102 833 SF $15.00 $12,495
Central Area 10630 SF $15.00 $159,450
Sheet Metal Roofing with 3" Nailable Insulation and Ice and Water Shield To Replace Removed Sheet Metal Roofing
At Multi-Use Above Fan Room 106 SF $15.00 $1,583
Above Column Line 22 Wall 162 SF $20.00 $3,240
To Replace Wood Shakes
At Multi-Use 4898 SF $12.00 $58,777
Central Area East / West Sides 1456 SF $12.00 $17,477
Building Entries 1625 SF $15.00 $24,370
Central Area Skylight Monitors 619 SF $15.00 $9,290
Central Area Fan Room 577 SF $15.00 $8,654
North Slope by Pool Gallery 1843 SF $15.00 $27,645
Nailable Rigid Insulation - 3" Thick 11286 SF $4.00 $45,144 Additional insulation
sprayed from underside
Ice and Water Shield 11286 SF $3.00 $33,858
Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim
Cap / Counter at Membrane Roofs 1304 LF $25.00 $32,600
Drip / Edge at Roof Perimeter 616 LF $25.00 $15,400
Outside Corners / Hips / Ridges 775 LF $30.00 $23,250
Valley Flashing 87 LF $30.00 $2,610
Internal Gutters at Entries 114 LF $50.00 $5,700
Remove and replace with
deeper gutters
Skylight Opening Perimeters 326 LF $20.00 $6,520
Replace Skylights
822
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |12
Build Up Curb Heights
Attach a 4" x 12" to
existing frame piece
Central Area Monitors 168 LF $25.00 $4,200
North Slope by Pool Gallery 268 LF $25.00 $6,688
Flat Translucent Panel Skylights
Kalwall or equal -
mounted on wood curbs
Central Area Monitors 192 SF $90.00 $17,280
North Slope by Pool Gallery 468 SF $90.00 $42,120
Replace Soffits
Assuming removed due
to asbestos felt
Gypsum Sheathing Under Soffit
Panels
Sloped Soffits Excluded
Assume existing to
remain
Sloped Soffit at Multi-Use 144 SF $3.00 $433 Along south wall Flat Soffit 1602 SF $2.50 $4,005
Flat Soffit at Multi-Use Exit Doors 55 SF $2.50 $138
Flat Soffits at Building Entries 430 SF $2.50 $1,075
At Gable Ends 41 SF $5.00 $205
Soffit Boards
Assume Hardie panel or
similar
Sloped Soffits 1411 SF $4.50 $6,350
Sloped Soffits at Multi-Use 144 SF $4.50 $649 Along south wall Flat Soffits 1602 SF $4.00 $6,408
Flat Soffits at Multi-Use 55 SF $4.00 $220 At exit doors in south wall Flat Soffits at Building Entries 430 SF $4.00 $1,720
At entry doors in west
wall
At Gable Ends 41 SF $6.00 $246
Plywood Sheathing at Light Cove 287 SF $3.50 $1,005 1/2" sheathing Sloped Soffits at Light Coves 633 SF $5.00 $3,167 At building entries Vent Screen at Soffit 490 LF $5.00 $2,450
Trim Pieces
Assume Hardie trim
material
Perimeter Fascia Board 510 LF $40.00 $20,400 14" wide
Trim Under Gable Ends of Soffit 41 LF $10.00 $410
Trim at Vent Screen 1470 LF $8.00 $11,760
At Edges of Soffit Panels 1125 LF $7.00 $7,875
Fascia Board at Edge of Light Cove 128 LF $30.00 $3,840 12" wide Sloped Soffit at Light Coves 288 LF $10.00 $2,880
Flat Soffits at Building Entries 220 LF $7.00 $1,540
At entry doors in west
wall
Bottom of Bulkhead Walls at Entry 56 LF $10.00 $560
Repaint Louvers in Soffits 4 EA $150.00 $600
Repair Exposed Roof Beam Ends
Epoxy Wood Filler in Beam Ends 64 EA $50.00 $3,200
To repair weather
damage
Sheet Metal Cap Flashings on Beams 64 EA $150.00 $9,600 Restain Beam Ends 64 EA $25.00 $1,600
823
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |13
Replace Exterior Windows and Doors (Except Column Line 22) New Storefront Windows in Lieu of Original Hollow Metal Punched Window Openings 802 SF $85.00 $68,140
Building Entries at West Side 405 SF $85.00 $34,403
Sill Flashings Under Storefront 179 LF $20.00 $3,580
Storefront Doors w/Exit Hardware 8 EA $5,000.00 $40,000 New Hollow Metal Doors and Frames in Existing Openings
Hollow Metal Single Door Frames 3 EA $450.00 $1,350
Hollow Metal Double Door Frames 4 EA $500.00 $2,000
Hollow Metal Exit Doors 11 EA $750.00 $8,250
New Exit Door Hardware 11 EA $1,500.00 $16,500
Paint New Hollow Metal Frames 7 EA $60.00 $420
Paint New Hollow Metal Doors 11 EA $75.00 $825
Perimeter Membrane Flashings 625 LF $2.50 $1,563
Repair Damaged Plywood Sheathing on Sloped Roofs and Under Siding Assume 5% of area
damaged
Remove Existing Wall Sheathing 904 SF $2.50 $2,260
Replace Existing Sheathing 904 SF $5.00 $4,521
Modify Foundation Insulation Excluded
Assume existing is
sufficient
Insulate Exterior Walls and Sloped
Roofs
Except Column Line 22
wall
Sprayed Air Barrier on Sheathing
Under Sloped Metal Roofing 6504 SF $4.50 $29,268
On Sheathing Above Soffits 4782 SF $4.50 $21,519
On vertical walls above
soffits
Under Metal Wall Siding 3261 SF $4.50 $14,672
Under Fiber Cement Board Siding 8319 SF $4.50 $37,437
Rigid Insulation on Walls - 3"
Balance is sprayed
insulation
Under Metal Siding 3261 SF $4.00 $13,042
Under Fiber Cement Board Siding 8319 SF $4.00 $33,278
Spray Insulation Behind Planters 436 SF $5.00 $2,179
To fill void where sand is
removed
Spray Insulation in Framing
Under Sloped Roofing 6504 SF $2.50 $16,260
Above Soffits 4782 SF $2.50 $11,955
On vertical walls above
soffits
Under Metal Wall Siding 3261 SF $2.50 $8,151
Under Fiber Cement Board Siding 8319 SF $2.50 $20,798
Furring and Drywall on Ext. Walls 1257 SF $8.00 $10,058 To cover insul. in Boiler
Room, Hallway, etc.

New Exterior Wall Siding
Roof Gable and Step Walls
Metal siding on furring
over insulation
Fan Room Above Multi-Use 96 SF $30.00 $2,891
Gable Ends at Multi-Use 648 SF $28.00 $18,144
East Side at Roof Notches 96 SF $30.00 $2,869
824
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |14
Gables at East Side Roof Notches 218 SF $30.00 $6,543
Vertical Walls of Boiler Room 345 SF $28.00 $9,671
Vertical Walls Above Transformer 247 SF $28.00 $6,911
Roof Step Wall at Multi-Use 827 SF $28.00 $23,156
Fan Room Above Central Area 406 SF $30.00 $12,174
Gables at Skylight Monitors 234 SF $32.00 $7,488
Trim Strip at Base of Wall Panels 214 LF $60.00 $12,840 To simulate redwood trim
piece
Repaint Exposed Wall Louvers 8 EA $150.00 $1,200
Fiber Cement Wall Siding and Trim
Assume Hardie board
siding with trim strips
Multi-Use Area 5339 SF $12.00 $64,073
West Elevation 767 SF $12.00 $9,206
East Elevation 2213 SF $12.00 $26,553
Exterior Columns at Building Entry 86 SF $30.00 $2,573
Plywood Sheathing Under Siding 8319 SF $4.00 $33,278
To attach battens, trim,
etc.

Repaint Exposed Wall Louvers 2 EA $250.00 $500 At Boiler Room Caulking and Sealants for Exterior 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Subtotal of Exterior Envelope Modifications $1,523,752

MISCELLANEOUS INTERIOR DEMOLITION AND STRUCTURAL UPGRADES Remove items not
containing asbestos
Removal of Loose Equipment and Furnishings By Owner
Demolition in Fan and Storage Rooms
For access to sprayed
insulation
Wood Base in Multi-Use Fan Room 79 LF $1.00 $79
Multi-Use Fan Room Wall Drywall 844 SF $1.00 $844
Multi-Use Fan Room Ceiling Drywall 877 SF $1.25 $1,096
Remove/Reinstall Soffit Louver 1 LS $500.00 $500
For drywall material
handling
Multi-Use Storage Wall Drywall 144 SF $1.00 $144
Multi-Use Storage Ceiling Drywall 627 SF $1.25 $784 For fire sprinkler access Wood Base in Center Area Fan Room 111 LF $1.00 $111
Center Area Fan Room Wall Drywall 992 SF $1.00 $992
Center Area Fan Room Clng Drywall 833 SF $1.25 $1,041
Remove/Reinstall Wall Louver 1 LS $500.00 $500
For drywall material
handling
Dumpsters for Drywall Work 2 EA $500.00 $1,000
Demolition in Trash Room
For access to sprayed
insulation
Plaster on Walls 163 SF $5.00 $817
Plaster on Ceiling 109 SF $6.00 $653
Remove Finishes, Doors, and Interior Partitions Throughout Remainder of Building Miscellaneous Visqueen Enclosures 1 LS $500.00 $500
Miscellaneous Barricades / Closures 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500 825
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |15
Multi-Use Area 6101 SF $4.00 $24,404
Locker Room and Restroom Spaces 1914 SF $15.00 $28,710
Remove CMU walls and
floor slab
Balance of Center Area Space 10675 SF $5.00 $53,375
Not including Trash and
Boiler Rooms
Cut New Openings in CMU Walls 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000
To allow for new floor
plan
Upgrade Existing CMU Shear Walls
Preliminary Investigations 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000
To determine reinforcing
/ grouting pattern
Prepare Existing CMU Walls 6968 SF $1.75 $12,194
Reinforcing Mesh - 2" x 2" #12 6968 SF $2.50 $17,419
Protect Wood Ceiling Deck 2372 SF $2.50 $5,930
To protect exposed T&G
wood ceiling
Sprayed Gunite 4" Thick on One Side 6968 SF $6.00 $41,807 From floor to main roof
line
Premium for Close Tolerance Finish 6968 SF $3.00 $20,903 To allow for final finish
such as furring
Allowance for Foundation Upgrades 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000 In selected locations
where needed
Allowance for Additional Anchorage 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 At tops of CMU walls Upgrade Existing Plywood Shear Walls and Roof Decks
Increase nailing per
Structural Report
Multi-Use Exterior Walls 8277 SF $0.10 $828
Multi-Use Roof Deck 4740 SF $0.10 $474
Multi-Use Sloped Roof Deck 4898 SF $0.10 $490
Center Area Exterior Walls 3774 SF $0.10 $377
Center Area Interior Shear Walls 3139 SF $0.10 $314
Diaphragms Btwn Main / Upper Roofs 3751 SF $0.20 $750 In space between roofs Center Area Roof Deck 10630 SF $0.10 $1,063
Center Area Fan Room Roof Deck 833 SF $0.10 $83
North Sloped Roof by Pool Gallery 1843 SF $0.10 $184
Allowance for Added Anchor Bolts 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Allowance for Additional Tiedowns 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Allowance for Structural Modifications 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 Beams, etc. to
accommodate new
program
Subtotal of Interior Demolition and Structural Upgrades $394,866

INTERIOR FINISHES AND MEP MODIFICATIONS
Repair Finishes in Fan and Multi-Use Storage Rooms
Where removed for
insulation access
Wood Base in Multi-Use Fan Room 79 LF $20.00 $1,580
Multi-Use Fan Room Wall Drywall 844 SF $5.00 $4,219
Multi-Use Fan Room Ceiling Drywall 877 SF $6.00 $5,260
Multi-Use Storage Wall Drywall 144 SF $5.00 $720
Multi-Use Storage Ceiling Drywall 627 SF $6.00 $3,762
826
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |16
Wood Base in Center Area Fan Room 111 LF $20.00 $2,220
Center Area Fan Room Wall Drywall 992 SF $5.00 $4,961
Center Area Fan Room Clg Drywall 833 SF $6.00 $4,998
New Flooring in Multi-Use Storage 620 SF $6.00 $3,720
New Rubber Base in MU Storage 160 LF $2.50 $400
Repaint Wood Trim in Fan Rooms 258 LF $2.50 $645
Repaint Drywall in Fan Rooms 6053 SF $1.00 $6,053
Paint Misc. Items in Fan Rooms 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000
Repair Finishes in Trash Room
Where removed for
insulation access
Plaster on Walls 163 SF $10.00 $1,634
Plaster on Ceiling 109 SF $12.00 $1,306
Epoxy Paint in Trash Room 422 SF $2.50 $1,055
Repair Finishes in Boiler Room
Where modified for new
insulation
Paint Drywall Furring 623 SF $1.25 $778
Added to cover sprayed
insulation
Paint Exposed CMU / Gunite 560 SF $2.00 $1,120
Paint Exposed Wood Ceiling 610 SF $1.50 $915
Paint Exposed Wall Louvers 2 EA $250.00 $500
New Rubber Base on Furred Wall 53 LF $2.50 $133
Allowances for Finishes in Existing Spaces - New Partitions, Ceilings, Doors, Flooring, Millwork, and Specialty Items Multi-Use Area 6101 SF $50.00 $305,050
Locker Room and Restroom Spaces 1914 SF $250.00 $478,500 Balance of Center Area Space 10675 SF $60.00 $640,500
Temporary Heat for Finishes 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
Allowance for Specialties
Allowance for Interior Graphics 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 Includes paint and wall
mounted panels
Banners Hung From Ceiling 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
Acoustical Wall Panels 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000
Fire Sprinklers
New Water Main to Supply Sprinklers Excluded
Assume extended from
new addition
Dry System Valves and Compressor 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 Dry Sprinklers in Soffit Areas 4317 SF $8.00 $34,535
Multi-Use Fan and Storage Rooms 1504 SF $5.00 $7,518
Center Area Fan Room and Soffits 310 SF $6.00 $1,860
Multi-Use Area 6101 SF $5.00 $30,505
Cavity Between Main / Lower Roofs 10630 SF $6.50 $69,095 Center Area 12589 SF $5.00 $62,945
Fire Pump Excluded
Assume local water
pressure is sufficient
Plumbing In Center Area only
Remove Existing Piping Distribution 12589 SF $1.00 $12,589 Assume fixtures removed
w/interior demo
New Piping and Fixtures
Assume reusing existing
3" water service
827
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |17
Locker Room and Restroom Spaces 1914 SF $35.00 $66,990
Balance of Center Area Space 10675 SF $5.00 $53,375
Connections to HVAC Equipment 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
HVAC
Assume new system is
forced air vs. radiant
Disconnect Radiant Heat System 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500
Remove Equipment from Fan Rooms 2 EA $25,000.00 $50,000 Remove Existing Ductwork / Piping 21746 SF $3.00 $65,237 New HVAC Equip/Piping/Ductwork 21746 SF $32.00 $695,857 Assume equipment in
existing mechanical
rooms
Premium for Ducted Returns 21746 SF $5.00 $108,728
Reconnect Radiant Heat at Entries 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 Roof Flashing at New Flues 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500
Painting of Exposed Piping Excluded Assume pipe is insulated Painting of Exposed Ductwork 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
Excluded in Mechanical
Rooms
Temperature Controls 21746 SF $5.00 $108,728
Testing and Balancing 21746 SF $2.00 $43,491
Electrical and Low Voltage Systems
Temp. Electrical Power / Lighting 21746 SF $0.50 $10,873 Rem. Exist. Fixtures/Conduit/Wiring 21746 SF $1.00 $21,746 Rem. Exist. Low Voltage Cabling 21746 SF $0.50 $10,873
New Distribution Panels 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
Assume existing service
can be reused
New Lighting and Controls 21746 SF $12.00 $260,946
New Power Distribution 21746 SF $6.00 $130,473
Connect HVAC Equipment 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
Fire Alarm System 21746 SF $5.00 $108,728 Assume new system New MDF / IDF Equipment 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
Assume existing services
can be reused
Rough-in IT Conduit and Boxes 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
New Structured Cabling 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
A/V Conduit and Cabling 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
For sound systems and
televisions
A/V Equipment Excluded Assume with FF & E
Allowance for Sound Systems 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
In activity and multipurpose rooms
Rough-in Security Conduit and Boxes 21746 SF $1.00 $21,746 Security Cabling and Equipment 21746 SF $1.50 $32,618
Access control and
cameras
First Responder Radio Amplification System Excluded Assume not required Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Excluded
Assume with site
improvements
Standby Electrical Generator Excluded Assume not required Subtotal of Interior Finishes and MEP Modifications $3,859,839 828
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |18

BASE ESTIMATE SUMMARY
General Items $697,400
Pool Demolition and Separation of Structure at C.L. 22 $292,317 Exterior Envelope Modifications $1,523,752
Interior Demolition and Structural Upgrades $394,866
Interior Finishes and MEP Modifications $3,859,839
Subtotal $6,768,173
Indirect Costs - Insurance/Bonds/Permits-7% $473,772
Subtotal $7,241,945
General Contractor Overhead and Profit-6% $434,517
Subtotal $7,676,462
Design and Estimating Contingency-15% $1,151,469

Total Estimated Base Construction Cost $8,827,931
Remaining Building is 22,213 sq. ft. $397.42 /SF
Cost Estimate assumptions
• This estimate is based on the assumption this work will be part of a larger concurrent project that will include an addition to the existing building and reconstruction of the parking lot. The duration of construction will vary depending upon the phasing required. The General Conditions (supervision) in this estimate are based on an assumed duration of 10 months, which would be a portion of the larger project. • The existing building will be vacated during construction Prior to the start of this work, all materials containing asbestos or other hazardous materials will be removed and safely disposed of by an abatement contractor specialized in such removal. This will include removal of all wood shakes and redwood siding and underlying building paper; all interior drywall with texture, down to the underlying framing; all floor coverings adhered with mastic containing asbestos fibers; all asbestos-containing material in the pool area; and composite fire doors. Items that must be removed to gain access, such as cabinetry and wood trim shall also be disposed of prior to the start of this project. • This estimate includes demolition and removal of the existing Pool Gallery structure, pool deck, pool shell, and underground piping to make it ready for construction of the new addition. The common wall on Column Line 22 will left in place, but the suspended deck, supporting corbels, and windows and doors in this wall will be removed. It is assumed this wall will be incorporated into the new addition (but be separated by an expansion joint).
• Structural upgrades include the application of a 4" thick layer of reinforced sprayed concrete to upgrade existing CMU shear walls, additional nailing of existing wood shear walls and diaphragms, and allowances for additional attachment of shear walls to the existing structure and additional attachment of shear walls to existing foundations. It has been assumed the existing foundations are generally adequate to withstand the increased design loads, but an allowance has been included to upgrade a portion of existin g foundation locations.
• It is assumed the new program can be configured to work around existing shear wall locations, with only minor openings required.
829
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |19
• Allowances have been included to remove and replace up to ten percent (10%) of existing upper roo f sheathing and five percent (5%) of sheathing under sloped roofs and vertical walls. No allowance is included for repair of the main roof tongue and groove decking, except for within the interior finish allowances. • Existing floor slabs have been assumed to be left in place except at restroom and locker room areas, where floor slabs will be removed to allow for new sloped floors. These new floor slabs are included in the finish allowance for these spaces.
• New wall and roof insulation, air barrier, and upgraded doors, windows, and skylights will be provided for all exterior walls and roofs except for the wall on Column Line 22. New uninsulated storefront is included to close existing openings in this wall, but no insulation or finish is provided. It has been assumed the existing foundation insulation is sufficient.
• The new exterior envelope will consist of membrane roofing over 6" of rigid insulation on flat roofs; metal roofing over 3" of nailable rigid insulation on sloped roofs; metal siding over 3" of rigid insulation on gables and vertical walls; and cementitious fiber board siding over 3" of rigid insulation on walls currently covered with redwood siding. A sprayed air barrier will be applied to the substrate prior to installation of the rigid insulation (except a loose air barrier on flat roofs), and sprayed insulation will be applied to the interior surface of the exterior framed walls (except under flat roofs). Drywall will be replaced on the interior side of these exterior walls. Aluminum storefront framing has been assumed in lieu of the original hollow metal frames to improve thermal performance.
• Areas that are likely to remain in their current use, such as fan rooms, Multi-Use storage rooms, Boiler Room, and Trash Room will be left as is, except for modifications required to insulate the exterior walls and roofs, and be restored to their original condition.
• All work is to be done during normal business hours, without significant overtime or night work. • No provisions are included in this estimate for temporary space for Recreation Center personnel or storage of Owner equipment.
• As part of the new addition and site improvements, it will be necessary to extend a new water service main to supply fire sprinklers for both the new addition and this existing building. It has been assumed this new water main will be part of the site improvements, and not included as part of this work. The new Fire Sprinkler Entry Room and Fire Department response point will be in the new addition. • Fire sprinklers have been included as required by code for both for the main level and the interstitial space between the main and upper roofs. A separate dry fire sprinkler system has also been included for exterior soffits and concealed soffit framing.
• It has been assumed the existing 3" domestic water service, sanitary sewer service, electrical power, natural gas, and tele/data services are sufficient for this building and can be left as is and modified to reflect any new conditions.
• New HVAC equipment has been assumed to be located in the existing fan and boiler rooms. All existing equipment would be removed A premium for return ductwork has been included, versus the use of return air plenums, due to the wood structure.
• See the body of the estimate for further assumptions / inclusions / exclusions. • Items marked by "Allowance" were non-quantifiable.
• This estimate is based upon summer 2020 construction costs. If the project start date is after that, an escalation factor of five percent (5%) per year must be added. 830
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |20
• There were many assumptions required to prepare this cost estimate, some of which may not be correct. To attempt to account for this uncertainty, a contingency of fifteen percent (15%) has been included.

Exclusions
• Architect & Engineering or Other Consultant Fees
• Testing / Asbestos or Hazardous Materials Mitigation
• Field Inspections and Quality Control Testing
• Significant Temporary Heat or Cold Weather Protection • Planning and Zoning Permits, Fees, and Approvals
• Upgrades to the Electrical, Natural Gas, Water, Telephone, Cable TV, and Fiber Optic Services to the Building • Builder's Risk Insurance on the New Addition
• Reinforcement of the Existing Structure to Support New Snow Drift Loads • Additional Insulation on Foundation Walls or Under Floor Slabs • Additional Draft Stops in Soffits and Ceiling Cavities • ADA Door Operators
• Audio / Visual Equipment, Except for an Allowance for Sound Systems • Elevators or ADA Lifts
• Fire Pump or Standby Generator
• Removal of Existing Loose Furniture and Equipment
• Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E), Including All Fitness and Weight Equipment 831
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |21
SECTION 3: BUILDING ASSESSMENT
• Code Compliance Assessment
• Compliance Plans
• Existing Accessibility Analysis
832
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |22
Code Compliance Assessment
Assumptions
The Project consists of an alteration and addition to the existing Recreation Center Facility. The multi-use, administrative and locker room areas of the existing building will be retained and altered to accommodate a portion of the program requirements for the new facility. The balance of the program requirements are to be included in an addition to the building. The existing swimming pool and structure located to the north of the grid line 22 are to be eliminated and replaced with a new aquatic natatorium in the new addition. • There is no change in Occupancy Types from those at existing with Recreation & Swim Complex • Structural changes do not exceed 50%
Existing Conditions
• Building Area= 32,017 SF, Single Story
• Not currently protected by automatic fire sprinkler system (AFS) • Occupancy Type: Assembly A-3
• Type of Construction: Type VB
• 30 ft open on all sides of the building
Existing area approximations
• Multi-use Activity Areas, Administration 20,657 sf
• Swimming Pool Complex 11,360 sf
• Total 32,017 sf
Allowable Area and construction Type Analysis
Applicable Codes - 2019 California Building Code (CBC)
Allowable Building Area options based on Type of Construction:
• Type VB-NS
Area factor from Tables 506.2 = 6,000 sf
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
6,000 sf+ (6,000 x .75) = 10,500 sf
• Type VB -w/Automatic Fire System (AFS)
Area factor from Table 506.2 = 24,000 sf
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
24,000 sf+ (6,000 x .75) = 28,500 sf
Note: If no building addition or expansion is planned, the existing building would meet the allowable area limitations of Type VB construction, if an automatic fire sprinkler system is installed.

If a building addition is planned, the allowable area increase would decrease depending on the linear footage of existing perimeter. Assuming expansion on two sides (pool expansion in current location, gymnasium expansion elsewhere.

Existing building perimeter = 716 lin. ft.

Amount of perimeter affected by an addition = 288 lin. ft.

Allowable increase due to separation = (288/716 lf x 6000) = 2413 sf 24,000 sf+ 2,413 = = 26,413 sf
• Type IIIB - NS
Area factor from Table 506.2 = 9,500 sf
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
9,500 sf+ (9,500 x .75) = 16,625 sf
• Type IIIB -w/AFS
Area factor from Table 506.2 = 38,000 sf
833
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |23
Allowable area increase (separation all sides)
38,000 sf+ (9,500 x .75) = 45,125 sf
Compliance Options for existing building:
• Type VB
Add Automatic Fire Sprinkler System
Allowable area w/o separations = 24,000 sf
Actual Area = 20,400 ok
Provide building separation fire walls between the remaining portion of existing building and any new additions
• 2-hr if addition is V-A
• 3-hr if addition is 11I-B
Type III-B
Add Automatic Fire Sprinkler System
Change existing exterior bearing walls to 2-hr, n-combustible. Fire treated wood framing okay " Firewalls not required if total building area per story, including a Type III-B addition, does not exceed 45,125 sf and total building area (2-stories) does not exceed 90,250 sf.

Impacts on Building Renovation and Recommendations:
• Install new automatic fire sprinkler system
• Install new fire alarm and notification system
• Remove and replace building roof system, and any deck showing signs of deterioration • New roof insulation R35
• New exterior continuous EPS insulation at exterior, batt insulation inside stud cavity, R19 total • New exterior wall sheathing
834
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |24
Existing and Accessibility Analysis
The Access Compliance Assessment below, previously prepared by Williams + Paddon, generally identifies areas and elements of the existing facility that are not in compliance with current accessibility codes.

Alterations to the existing facility will be subject to the requirements of CBC Section 11 B-202. The requirements include full compliance for all altered elements and spaces and an accessible path of travel to the specific areas of alteration. The primary accessible path of travel shall include:

1. A primary entrance to the building or facility,

2. Toilet and bathing facility serving the area,

3. Drinking fountains serving the area,

4. Public telephones serving the area, and

5. Signage
The cost of the alteration will exceed the valuation threshold so full compliance with the requirements described above is mandatory regardless of cost unless the enforcing agency determines that the cost is an unreasonable hardship.

The following assessment was provided by Williams + Paddon in the facility assessment conducted March 2016. 835
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |25
836
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |26
837
SLT R
ecreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |27
838
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |28
SECTION 4: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
Hazardous Materials Assessment
The City of South Lake Tahoe commissioned a hazardous materials test of the existing building by Environmental Testing & Consulting Inc. dated September 17, 2019. In an excerpt from this report, the methodology and purpose are summarized as follows:

On September 12 and 17, 2019, a representative from Environmental Testing & Consulting (ETC) collected samples of building materials * (roofing, wood shake black paper, composite shingles, fire-taped walls/ceiling, stucco, knock down texture wall/ceiling, thermal system insulation, 12" x 12" white speckled floor tile/mastic, 4" and 6" cove base mastic, 12" x 12" ceiling tiles, composite fire doors, HVAC tape, and sheet flooring/mastic) in the areas (occupied space and exterior - please see attached sketch for exact sample locations) of the above-mentioned facility/residence intended for removal/renovation. The contractor described the scope of work.

The purpose of this survey was to determine if Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) existed in the building materials that may be disturbed by an intended renovation. With this knowledge, the Owner or the Owner's Agent can determine what abatement action is necessary for appropriate health and safety precautions and to comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulatory requirements prior to and during the proposed renovation. The survey work included conducting a visual inspection of the proposed work areas to determine types of building materials present, then developing and implementing a sampling plan of all accessible suspect asbestos containing materials in the intended renovation area. Samples were collected from th e impacted materials. The samples were analyzed for asbestos content by EPA Method 600/R-93/116.

From the summary, the description and location of all ACM detected in the survey is summarized in the following table. The following homogenous materials were determined to be ACM because the analytical results indicate they contain greater than 0.1%** asbestos:
839
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |29
The materials determined not to be ACM because they did not contain regulated quantities of asbestos include:
• Knock down texture wall/ceiling materials in the gym storage area (<1000 square feet) • Tar and gravel roofing (>6 square feet)
• Composite shingles (>6 square feet)
• Stucco around the pool (>6 square feet)
• Thermal system insulation (joints, elbows, etc.) in all mechanical rooms (>6 square feet) • HVAC tape/wrap in in all mechanical rooms (>6 square feet) • Stucco in the pool bathroom/locker room (>6 square feet) • Mini tank insulation in the pool mechanical room (>6 square feet) • 12" x 12" white speckled floor tile in the activity room, copy room, kitchen (>6 square feet) • 4" and 6" cove base mastic throughout (>6 square feet) • 12" x 12" ceiling tile in the bathrooms and administration offices (>6 square feet) • Fire-taped wall/ceiling materials in the mechanical room above the maintenance office (>6 square f eet) • Sheet flooring/mastic in the kitchen (>6 square feet) • Fire-taped wall/ceiling materials in the gym mechanical room (>6 square feet) Impacts on Building Renovation:
• Abate all drywall and texture containing asbestos, replace all new drywall and texture • Abate all floor tile and mastic, replace all floor tile • Abate exterior paper, remove shake shingles. Replace exterior building cladding with cementitious wood siding on new dens deck, building paper and sheathing 840
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |30
Section 5: StructuralAssessment
Introduction
Gabbart & Woods Tahoe Partners has been retained by Perkins & Will to provide assistance regarding the feasibility of incorporating portions of the existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center into a future Recreation Complex. This proposed complex includes new construction adjoining remodeled existing construction. Our narrative is prepared to provide such assistance.

Limitations
This narrative is of a general nature; in-depth analysis and calculations were not undertaken within this scope of work. No lateral analysis of the existing building was undertaken.

Existing Building Areas
The existing South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center is comprised of three general areas:
• Multi-Purpose / Gym Area
• Central Area with Entries/ Lobbies / Classrooms
• Pool Area
Within the context of this narrative, it is assumed that the existing Pool Area will be demolished and replaced by a new enclosed Pool Building. Therefore, this narrative will address the feasibility of retaining and remodeling only the Multi-Purpose / Gym Area and the Central Area with Entries / Lobbies / Classrooms.

Applicable Codes / Standards
The evaluations within this narrative are based upon the following Codes and Standards:
• 2019 California Building Code, including Chapter 34A, “Existing Structures” • 2019 California Existing Building Code
• ASCE Standard, ASCE 7-17, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures” • ASCE Standard, ASCE 41-17, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings” Existing Plans and Details / Site Visit
To obtain information for the preparation of this narrative, we referred to copies of the original plans and details by Schuyler L. Jeffries AIA & Associates, dated 2.6.74. We also visited the site on 11.20.19 to observe the visible elements of the structure.

DESIGN CRITERIA
The following Design Criteria applies to the proposed Recreation Complex, in accordance with the requirements of The City of South Lake Tahoe:

Structural Risk Category III, based upon conceivable occupancy of more than 150 people in the main gathering areas.

Snow Design
Snow Load (Pg) = 150 psf
• Exposure coefficient (Ce) = 1.0
• Thermal coefficient (Ct) = 1.0
• Snow Importance Factor (Is) =1.10, for Risk Category III Seismic Design
• Mapped spectral response acceleration (Ss) = 1.538
• Seismic Design Category D
• Seismic Site Class D
• Seismic Importance Factor (Ie) = 1.25, for Risk Category III Wind Design
• Wind Speed (Vult) = 130 mph
• Wind Speed (Vasd) = 101 mph
841
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |31
• Wind Exposure Category B
Soil Capacity = 1500 psf (Assumed default value unless a geotechnical report provides higher values) Floor Live Loads
• Multi-purpose areas = 100 psf
• Egress areas = 100 psf
• Classrooms / Offices= 50 psf
Existing Structural Systems Description
Multi-Purpose / Gym Area
The existing Multi-Purpose / Gym Area is a one-story structure consisting of central level timber roof framing, perimeter sloping mansard timber roof framing, timber ceiling framing, wood stud and plywood shear walls, a slab-on-grade floor, and concrete stem walls with shallow concrete continuous footings and spread pads.

Central Area with Entries/ Lobbies / Classrooms
The existing Central Area with Entries / Lobbies / Classrooms is a one-story structure consisting of level timber “upper” roof framing, level timber structural ceiling framing (aka “main roof” on the original plans) , perimeter sloping mansard roof framing, wood stud and plywood shear walls, concrete masonry unit (CMU) shear walls, and concrete stem walls with shallow concrete continuous footings and spread pads. A portion of the roof structure bears upon the concrete structure associated with the Pool Area which may be identified for demolition.

General Condition of the Existing Structural Systems (Observations are limited to those elements visible at the time of our site visit.)
Wood Roof Framing:

In general, the wood roof structure does not appear to show signs of structural distress. We did not observe significant structural cracks or visible signs of deflection beyond accepted norms.

Some wood members in the perimeter sloping mansard roofs, which are exposed to the outside elements show some normal, and repairable, deterioration.

The condition of the existing roof plywood diaphragms is not completely known, but those areas visible from below appear to be in good condition.

Wood Stud and Plywood Walls:

No visible signs of distress were noted in the wood stud and plywood walls. Walls appeared to be plumb and true.

CMU Walls:

No visible signs of distress were noted in the CMU walls. Walls appeared to be plumb and true. The wall reinforcing pattern is not known, nor is it known if the walls are solid grouted or partially grouted.

Concrete Floor Slabs:

According to the original plans, the slabs on grade are 4 inches thick with welded wire mesh, over 2 inches of sand over a vapor barrier over 4 inches of rock base. No visible signs of distress were noted in the slabs, nor were slabs observed to be significantly out of level.

Concrete Walls and Stem walls:

No visible signs of distress were noted in the concrete walls and stem walls.

Concrete Footings:

Concrete footings were not visible for observation however no signs of significant settlement were observed.

Load Resistance Requirements of the Existing Structural Systems as affected by Additions and Alterations Lateral Loads:
842
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |32
This narrative assumes that seismic forces will govern over wind forces in the general design of the lateral force system and its primary elements.

Governing Code Sections
• CBC Section 3403A.4 “Where the addition is structurally independent of the existing structure, existing lateral load-carrying structural elements shall be permitted to remain unaltered.” • CBC Section 3404A.4 / Exception 1 “Any existing lateral load-carrying structural element whose demand-capacity ratio with the alteration considered is no more than 10 percent greater than its demand-capacity ratio with the alteration ignored shall be permitted to remain unaltered.” Commentary
• The existing Lateral Force System consists of plywood wood roof diaphragms, plywood shear walls, and CMU shear walls.
• It is desirable that Additions be designed to be structurally independent of the existing building. This simplifies the path to code conformance by not placing additional demand upon the existing structure to resist lateral load forces from the Additions.
• Even if the Additions are independent of the existing building, there could be additional lateral load exerted on the existing roof due to drifting snow from the Additions. It would be desirable to configure roofs and /or parapets of the Additions to prevent the deposition of drifting snow onto the existing roof. • It is reasonable to assume that the existing roof diaphragms can be adapted to meet acceptable demand-capacity ratios.
• While it is desirable that an increase in the demand-capacity ratio of existing building shear walls due to alterations be limited to 10 percent, this may not be a realistic goal. Many of the existing building’s interior wood stud walls and CMU walls were detailed as shear walls and it is likely that proposed floor plan alterations may eliminate significant sections of these shear walls. If this is the case, the building’s remaining and new shear walls would require justification with the provisions of the 2019 CBC, or alternatively, with the tiered performance analysis procedures of ASCE 41 -17. ▪ Strengthening of the wood shear walls to meet the provisions of the 2019 CBC could be undertaken by increasing nailing, adding anchor bolts and supplementing tiedown hardware. ▪ CMU shear walls in buildings designated Seismic Design Category D must conform to the requirements of Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls (SRMSW) in order to meet the requirements of the 2016 CBC. These requirements in the present codes aim to provide ductility in the shear walls to deter brittle failure in a design level seismic event. The existing CMU shear walls almost certainly do not meet the reinforcing detailing required of SRMSW.

A tiered performance analysis of the existing CMU shear walls in accordance with ASCE 41-17 could be undertaken in conjunction with testing (non-destructive and / or destructive) of the existing wall grout and reinforcing. It may not be realistic however to expect that the existing walls would be found to provide the required performance characteristics.

More realistically, the existing CMU shear walls could be strengthened to meet the requirements of the 2019 CBC. This could be accomplished by adding surface mats of steel reinforcing bars and a pneumatically applied concrete (“shot-crete”) layer with a minimum thickness of at least 4 inches. Some new foundations may also be required in this strengthening process.
▪ CMU shear walls also must meet current code requirements regarding “out-of- plane” seismic forces (ie perpendicular to the wall surface). Anchorage force code requirements for attachmen t of the top of the CMU wall to the roof diaphragm have increased significantly since the time of the original design and therefore strengthening of these connections may be required. This may be accomplished by installing new epoxied anchors into the grouted walls and using welded steel plates with bolts to the wood roof framing.
▪ Grid line 22, the existing interface of the Central Area with the Pool Area, is an important line in the lateral load paths. A new shear wall or new moment frame system would be required here when the existing pool structure is demolished. Temporary shoring will be required. 843
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |33
Gravity (Snow) Loads
Governing Code Section:
• CBC Section 3403A.3 / Exception 1 “Any existing gravity load-carrying structural element for which an addition and its related alterations cause an increase in design gravity load of more than 5 percent shall be strengthened, supplemented, replaced, or otherwise altered as needed to carry the increased load required by this code for new structures.

Commentary
• Per the 2019 CBC, a Snow Importance factor of 1.10 is required if there is an assignment of structural Risk Category III to the building. The basic flat roof design snow load would therefore be Pr= (0.7) (1.0) (1.0) (1.1) 150=116 psf.
• Drifting Snow: In the proposed new Recreation Complex, it is possible that Additions will create conditions which could deposit drifting snow on the existing roof structures. Therefore, consideration should be given to additional drift snow loads in accordance with ASCE 7 -10, Section 7.7. As mentioned in the “lateral forces” section above, it would be desirable to configure roofs and /or parapets of the Additions to prevent the deposition of drifting snow onto the existing roof. Actual roof geometries will determine the design magnitude of the resulting drift snow loads. If it is thought that significant drifting will occur, we suggest that a drift surcharge load Pd of 70 psf, applied in a manner suggested in ASCE 7- 10 figure 7-8, be used.
• Design criteria for the existing building was not available for our review, but from our review of the original plans, as well as our spot check calculations for key roof members, we believe it is likely that the original design snow load was at least equivalent to the current basic 116 psf requirement, but perhaps less than that now required in areas which will experience drifting snow load. • Wood rafters and wood beams may be strengthened to meet the 2016 CBC design requirements in areas of drifting snow. For rafters, this may be accomplished by the addition of “sistered” like-sized members alongside the existing members. For beams this may be accomplished by the addition of new posts with footings to shorten the beam spans or by the addition of bolted steel plates alongside portions of the existing wood beams.
• We believe the vast majority of existing posts and footings will most likely be found to meet the requirements of the 2019 CBC.
• Grid line 22, the existing interface of the Central Area with the Pool Area, is an important line in the roof loads. A new bearing wall or new post and beam system would be required here when the existing pool structure is demolished. Temporary shoring will be required.

Summary
In summary, the existing building’s structural systems appear to be in good serviceable condition. The CMU shear walls are likely not designed to today’s ductility or diaphragm anchorage requirements, but other structural elements observed and reviewed on the plans are likely to be reasonably close to meeting today’s codes and standards of care.

Desirable characteristics of any Additions and Alterations, from a structural standpoint, might include:
• Design and detail the proposed Additions as independent structures with seismic joints at the interface with the existing building.
• Design the Additions’ roof geometry to not deposit significant drift snow load upon the existing roofs. • Leave intact, to a reasonable extent, the many existing wood stud and plywood shear walls. • Do not disturb the existing CMU shear walls.

Other recommendations for the future engineering design phase include:
• Undertake exploratory investigation (possibly including limited focused demolition) and testing of a representative sample of the existing CMU walls prior to design. 844
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |34
• Check the capacity of the existing anchorage details at the top of the CMU shear walls and consider strengthening these connections.
• In specific areas where shear walls are to be reduced in length or removed altogether, remaining shear walls may be strengthened, and / or new walls strategically added. Wood shear walls may be strengthened more easily and cost effectively than CMU shear walls. • Grid line 22, the interface of the existing Central Area and Pool Area, would require shoring during demolition of the existing pool structure. A new structural wall or new moment frame should be incorporated at this line to support lateral loads and snow loads from the existing structure. • Some exposed wood roof framing tails at the mansard roofs show normal signs of wear from exposure to moisture, and these members could benefit from added protection.

Finally, in any cost analysis it would be wise to provide an allowance for unforeseen conditions and potential structural issues currently not visible or known.
845
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |35
SECTION 6:MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING

ASSESSMENT
Summary
Sugarpine Engineering (SPE) was asked to review the existing envelope, mechanical, electrical, and plumbin g (MEP) systems in the facility indicated above. Envelope was reviewed for energy and thermal performance only.

The purpose of our field observation and subsequent research was to determine, to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty, whether the existing MEP systems have significant remaining useful life, and to what extent, if any, they can be kept or re-used for a remodel or expansion of this facility.

Our work considered whether systems are configured appropriately relative to current building codes, ordinances, published standards, and regional construction precedence. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of those findings.

Note that this report is based on engineering judgment, visual observation, review of the works of others , and engineering experience. Items were evaluated to reasonable accuracy based on available information, and one visual review of the facility. Should new information become available, we reserve the right to evaluate this information and any impact it that it may have on our findings. This is a summary report and is not an exhaustive report. No destructive testing or destructive investigation was performed.

Executive Summary
The facility appears to have been well-built when it was constructed. Most current MEP systems are built to last 20-25 years. 45 years is approaching the end of even the best-case lifespan of all parts of MEP systems, except generally ductwork and dry sheet metal. We recommend that some newer components be kept, but most of the systems in the facility should be replaced.

Observations

1. General:
a. The MEP systems were constructed in 1974, with final facility completion in 1975. b. Most of the systems are in the original configuration with original products, and generally match the design plans.
c. Facility is operational in its present condition.
d. Piping is likely nearing the end of its useful life. e. Evidence of severe ice damming and roof leaks.
f. Severe corrosion on all parts of the pool wing.
g. Windows and main doors are metallic storefront and steel framed systems. Double-pane clear glazing.
h. Service doors are hollow wood or steel.

2. Envelope:
a. No insulation on CMU block or concrete walls.
b. 2x6 walls with fiberglass batt (per original plans, not visible). c. Roof batt insulation thickness not visible, not clearly indicated on original plans. d. Evidence of severe and prolonged roof leaks; calcium stalactites and stalagmites. e. Evidence of severe and prolonged interior condensation and associated corrosion damage.

3. Pool:
a. Filters are sand type, manufactured in 2012.
b. Filter pump was manufactured in 2015. 15hp motor.
c. Boiler (pool heater) with its associated pump was manufactured in 2019. 1,260 MBH input, 1,071 MBH output nameplate rating.
d. Original heat exchanger (used to be fed by the main boilers) has been removed. e. Room humidity is high.
846
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |36
f. Evidence of condensation and corrosion.
g. Pool water treatment is done by adding oxidizers. No UV system exists. h. Chemical storage room MEP systems are extremely corroded.

4. Fire Protection:
a. No sprinkler system exists.
b. No alarm system exists.

5. Plumbing:
a. Metallic piping and plumbing fixtures in and near the pool area are severely corroded. b. Fixtures are mostly original, commercial and heavy-duty grade. c. Showerheads appear to be lower-flow than original.
d. Fiberglass packaged showers were added to the Women’s locker room somewhat recently. e. Main shower valves are original. At least one is leaking at the handle. f. Two domestic water heaters were new around 2006. Original boiler-heated tanks were replaced with gas-fired units at that time. Pumps appear to have been replaced around the same time. g. Piping and insulation appear to be original and in good condition. Note that pipe wall thickness was not evaluated, but neither our visual review nor staff report indicated any leaking pipes.

6. HVAC:
a. Large boiler was manufactured in 1974. 5,000 MBH input, 4,000 MBH output nameplate rating. b. Small boiler was manufactured in 2010 and replaced the second large boiler. 2,000 MBH input, 1,700 MBH output nameplate rating.
c. Numerous repairs have been made to almost all hot-water heating components; air handlers, valves, pumps, tanks, etc.
d. Most pumps have been repaired and/or replaced, assumed to be part of the 2010 mechanical repair/upgrade projects.
e. Expansion tank is atmospheric-type and appears to be original. f. Ductwork appears to be original.
g. Cogeneration gas turbine (heat + electricity) was manufactured in 2010. Is not in operation. Staff reports that it was possibly damaged during installation, doesn’t work, and has been off for years. h. Cogeneration heat exchanger was manufactured and installed same as turbine. System is piped but not used.
i. Piping and insulation appear to be original and in good condition. j. Air handling units and fans have leaks at their coil piping. k. Air handling units are original. Main exhaust fan wheel is unbalanced, or shaft is bent, causing the attic to shake.
l. Attic is being used as a return-air plenum.

7. Electrical
a. Generator is Cummins/Onan manufactured in 1991. 300 kW / 375 kVA, 120/208V, 3-phase. Remote outdoor radiator. Appears to be in good condition.
b. Automatic transfer switch is Cummins/Onan manufactured in 1991. 1000A, 120/208V, 3-phase.

NEMA 3R rated for outdoor installation. Appears to be in good condition. c. Main distribution switchboard is Westinghouse manufactured in 1974. 1000A, 120/208V, 3-phase.

This is the original switchboard. Shows signs of rust/oxidation and corrosion. Missing hardware and labeling. Housing not fully enclosed.
d. Distribution panelboards are Westinghouse. Appear to be original. Show sign s of rust/oxidation and corrosion. Circuit labeling unreliable.
e. Receptacles are a variety with most having been replaced at some point since the original construction. Many areas lack GFCI protections. Some outdoor receptacles lack adequate weatherproof coverings. Some areas lack sufficient receptacles, promoting the use of power strips and extension cords.
f. Switched receptacles would be required in office and lobby areas to meet current CA energy code.

8. Lighting
a. Fixtures are mostly a variety of incandescent, fluorescent, and compact fluorescent fixtures with a few newer LED fixtures.
b. Most lighting fixtures are functioning with some fixtures in disrepair. c. There are a variety of color temperatures lamps installed, resulting in some fixtures appearing yellow and others appearing blue in hue.
847
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |37
d. Most of the lighting fixtures will not comply with current CA energy codes because they are not dimmable or do not meet the required efficacy.
e. Light switching also generally does not comply with current CA energy codes. f. Parking lot lighting was observed during the daytime and was not reviewed for adequacy to remain.

Findings and Potential Issues

1. General:
a. Pipes generally wear out through corrosion and erosion in 30-50 years, depending on water quality. Copper can last longer if water quality is tightly controlled. b. Piping specialties (valves, fittings, flanges, gauges, etc.) have been replaced over time, and can be periodically replaced and repaired indefinitely if parts are available. c. Systems are generally in good condition, considering their age. Most HVAC and plumbing systems in facilities of this type are designed to last 20-30 years.

2. Envelope:
a. Wall insulation does not meet current energy code.
b. Insulation within walls may be damaged from long term exposure to severe condensation and roof leaks.
c. Roof insulation does not meet current energy code. Roof is not thick enough to be insulated per code.
d. Windows, skylights, and doors do not meet current energy code. e. Some windows, skylights, and doors are damaged/corroded beyond repair.

3. Pool:
a. CPVC piping has remaining useful life, as CPVC is generally nonreactive to pool water. Note however that with low material cost, re-using salvaged CPVC is generally not recommended.

Fittings with glue joints must be cut-out and cannot be reused. b. Sand filters and their controls have significant remaining useful life. c. Boiler, controls and flue have significant remaining useful life. d. Plumbing fixtures in the pool area have exceeded their useful life. e. Surge tank visually appears to be stable, but this is not verifiable. Configuration and access from the pool deck is a safety concern.
f. Plumbing fixture access and deck drainage does not comply with current plumbing or pool health codes.
g. Deck drain system has been repaired and deck patched in several locations. Drains have exceeded their useful life. Cannot locate an air gap as required by current code.

4. Fire Protection:
a. No system exists. NFPA 13 sprinkler and alarm systems are required by current codes.

5. Plumbing:
a. Shower valves need leak repair.
b. Plumbing fixtures can have a useful life of more than 50 years if properly maintained and parts remain available. However, current code requires lower flowrates, so these fixtures cannot be re-installed.
c. Fixtures and piping (brass devices, solder) likely contain lead. d. Parking lot storm drains are simple area wells and do not adequately drain, causing flooding of the facility.

6. HVAC:
a. Leaks at many pumps, valves and coils.
b. Corrosion exists on most components.
c. Ducts generally do not wear out unless exposed to corrosives. d. Pool area is extremely humid and condensation corrosion has destroyed windows, doors, trim, and other metal components. Surfaces are wet to the touch. Windows are dripping, with water staining on the floor from continuous wetting.
e. Corrosion is accelerated by chemical treatment.
f. Chemical room MEP systems are extremely corroded, and corroded electrical systems pose a safety hazard because grounding may be compromised.
g. Attic materials are not suitable for use as a return air plenum. 848
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |38
h. Fire and smoke dampers are not in current code-required locations and configurations. i. Heating water is constant-flow; does not comply with current energy code. j. Controls, alarms and safeties were not verified, but likely are not in compliance with current codes.

7. Electrical:
a. Generator and ATS may have significant useful life and can be re-used if the future design permits and if the generator meets the current emission requirements. Does not appear to have experienced significant usage.
b. Corroded and obsolete equipment and devices should be replaced out of safety and fire concerns.
c. Electrical Service is inadequate to provide power for EV Charging, required by current codes.

8. Lighting:
a. Fixtures are energy consuming and do not comply with current energy codes. b. Fixtures are not dimmable, so they can’t be used with code-required dimming and daylight controls.
c. Circuiting is not configured such that controls can be easily added. d. A substantial remodel will require that all lighting be brought up to current codes. e. Egress and Exit lighting does not meet current code.

Recommendations and Code Requirements

1. Pool:
a. Demolish entire pool area; no salvageable MEP infrastructure. b. Keep or re-use heating boiler, controls, flue.
c. Keep or re-use sand filters, controls.
d. Keep or re-use main circulation pump.
e. Replace entire deck drainage system.
f. Replace all plumbing fixtures.
g. Replace make-up water system.
h. Add UV disinfection system.
i. Upgrade chemical controls.
j. Replace all MEP systems in chemical and pool equipment rooms.

2. Envelope:
a. Replace all windows, skylights, and doors with code-compliant units. b. Apply new vapor barriers on interior surfaces of all walls and roofs. c. Apply new vapor permeable membranes on outside of walls and roofs. d. Apply sandwich panel or similar foam insulation on outside of all CMU and concrete walls. e. Remove all wall interior surfaces and exterior siding, then spray-foam solid all wall cavities. f. Increase roof thickness approx. 6”, and spray-foam solid all roof cavities.

3. Fire Protection:
a. Add fire sprinkler system to the facility.
b. Add fire alarm system to the facility.
c. Add new 8” fire water service to the facility.

4. Plumbing:
a. All new systems are recommended.
b. Replace all plumbing fixtures.
c. Replace all piping, valves and fittings.
d. Replace all water heaters. May use indirect heating in conjunction with boiler system replacement.
e. Replace all pumps.
f. Change parking lot drainage; route to storm drains.
g. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes.

5. HVAC:
a. All new systems are recommended.
b. Replace large boiler. Large boiler has exceeded its useful life. c. Small boiler may have useful life remaining. Typical lifespan is 20 years, so 10 remaining. d. Remove dysfunctional cogeneration unit.
849
SLT Recreation Swim Center Conditional assessment |39
e. Replace corroded unit heaters in chemical and pool equipment rooms. Other units may have useful life remaining.
f. Balance fans, clean and refurbish air handling units in place. Unit structure and configuration is still in good condition.
g. Add fire ratings and suitable treatments to attics used as return air plenums. h. Replace all valves and actuators.
i. Replace all piping in the building.
j. Replace entire boiler plant system with variable flow pumping and suitable devices. k. Replace all control valves; re-pipe all coils and devices for variable flow. l. Replace all controls with a unified digital control system. Although pneumatic controls have some remaining useful life, digital controls are generally more capable, expandable, less expensive to repair, and contractors are more familiar with service and maintenance. m. Re-seal all ductwork.
n. May keep air handling units, but replace all coils, controls, and fan motors. o. Replace all VFDs and electrical infrastructure.
p. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes.

6. Electrical:
a. Keep or re-use generator, if design permits.
b. Keep or re-use ATS, if design permits.
c. Replace all circuits, conductors, and conduits.
d. Replace all panels and subpanels.
e. Replace all disconnects and motor starters.
f. Replace all receptacles.
g. Add demand-responsive devices.
h. Upgrade electrical service and service entrance equipment (switchboard). i. Add Electric Vehicle chargers.
j. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes.

7. Lighting:
a. Replace all lighting fixtures with dimmable high-CRI LED fixtures. b. Replace all lighting controls.
c. Add daylighting controls, dimmers, timeclocks, occupancy sensors, and other code-required devices.
d. Change all lighting circuits.
e. Review exterior site lighting for adequacy.
f. Other changes or replacements as may be necessary due to architectural changes. g. Replace all egress and exit lighting; add fixtures as necessary. 850

AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE 56-ACRE PROPERTY
THIS AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE 56-ACRE PROPERTY (''Agreement'’) dated as of this a&day of Fe,b ruar,v 2022, the last day of execution (the -Effective Date"), is entered into by and between the CIT’Y OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a municipal corporation (-'City’'). and EL DORADO COUNTY. a political subdivision of the State of California (“County’'). The City and County may each be referred to as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties.

RECITALS
The following Recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:

A. The City owns approximately 15 acres of property in the City of South Lake Tahoe. also known as Assessor's Parcel Number 026-050-004 (the '-Original City Property’').

The Original City Property is a portion of an overall property known as the 56-Acres. The County owns the other approximately 41 acres of property that make up the 56-Acres, also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 026-050-003, 026-050-005. and 026-050-006 (the ''Original County Property“). The Original City Property was conveyed to the City by County by Grant Deed dated April 1 7, 1973. and recorded in the Official Records of El Dorado County on April 23. 1 973 ("Grant Deed-'). The Grant Deed includes certain terms regarding the City's use of the Original City Property. including that the property be used for public park. recreation, cultural and visitor services. The Original City Property and the Original County Property may hereinafter be referred to as the "56-Acre Property." which is depicted in Exhibit A, Site Map, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

B. The City and County currently utilize the 56-Acre Property for both City and County facilities, including a public beach. campground, senior center and senior nutrition program. ice arena. library, and vector control facilities. In addition, the City has leased portions of the 56-Acre Property to community groups and public agencies for visitor, art and emergency medical services purposes.

C. County and City have entered into various agreements over the last few decades to provide for the County's lease of the entire portion of the Original County Property to City and the construction of various facilities on the County Property. The original Lease of Real Property between the County and City was dated July 1, 1 968, and thereafter replaced with a new lease and series of amendments as follows: (1 ) Lease of Real Property between the County and City dated December 12. 1972; (2) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated December 9, 1986; (3) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated April 14. 1987; (5) Amendment to Lease of Real Property dated January 26, 20 10; (4) Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of El Dorado and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Construction of the El Dorado Beach Improvement Project in the South Lake Tahoe Recreational Area ("Beach Improvement MOU”);and (5) Amendment 1 to the Beach Improvement MOU dated April 17. 2014 " (collectively, the ''Original 56-Acre Agreements"). In addition, the City and County entered 1 C. –c,c> ? - MaD\851
into a Facility Use Agreement, dated February 15, 20 ]2 for the County's use of a portion of the City's leased property (collectively, the "Existing Use Agreement”).

D. The City has subleased certain portions of the Original County Property pursuant to the following lease agreements: (1) Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the South Lake Chamber of Commerce dated April 4, 2006; and (2) a Lease Agreement between the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Tahoe Art League dated May 7, 2012 (-County Property Subleases”). In addition, City has entered into a Sublease Agreement between the California Tahoe Emergency Services Operations Authority, dated February 1 1 , 2020 (“EMS Sublease’').

E. The City and County desire to work collaboratively to maximize the public benefits from the 56-Acre Property, update previous planning efforts and enable the provision of the highest quality recreation and government facilities and services on the 56-Acre Property.

F. The 56-Acre Property is anticipated to become the identifiable recreation and government center of the South Lake Tahoe, with the development of the site as a park-like campus with plentiful recreation facilities. the centralization of City government facilities and services and a "downtown“ environment centered on the 56-Acre Property and neighboring Harrison Avenue commercial district.

G. The City and County have worked collaboratively to identify future public improvements on the 56-Acre Property and negotiate terms for a new agreement for the 56-Acre Property to replace the Original 56- Acre Agreements.

H. The California Tahoe Conservancy has provided grant funding for the development of the 56-Acre Property and has expressed support for this Agreement.

I. On January 14. 2020. the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe and the Board of Supervisors of the County of El Dorado adopted similar resolutions, Resolution 2020- 006. and Resolution 007-2020 respectively, Outlining Proposed Terms for a New Agreement between El Dorado County and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of Recreation and Government Facilities on the ''56-Acres’' (''56-Acre Terms Resolution").

J. The City has prepared a Master Plan for the 56-Acre Property (''Master Plan’'), which includes, among other things, a new Multi-Generational Recreation/Swim/Senior Center Facility (the ''New Multi-Generational Center“). a depiction of which is shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

K. City and County have also agreed to exchange certain real property located on the 56-Acre Property to effectuate its development and to lease certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan. The subject property is exempt surplus property under the Surplus Lands Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq., and implementing guidelines as the transferring agency’s property is being exchanged for other property necessary for the transferring agency's use and is being transferred to another local agency for the transferee's use.
9 852
L. In connection with consideration of the Master Plan and this Agreement. the City completed review under the California Environmental Quality Act (''CEQA”) and prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration.

M. On January 1 8, 2022. the City Council approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Master Plan.

N. City and County desire to enter into this Agreement in accordance with the 56- Acre Terms Resolution and subsequent negotiations in order to set forth the terms and conditions. among other things relating to (1 ) the amendment and restatement of the Original 56- Acre Agreements; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with the Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56- Acre Property.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City and County hereby agree as follows:

1. RE PRES ENTAT IONS AND WARRANTIES / TERM P

1.1 Representations and Warranties.
(a) City Representations. City represents and warrants to County as follows:
(i) Authority. City is a municipal corporation of the State of California. City has full right, power and lawful authority to perform its obligations hereunder and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by City has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of City.
(ii) No Conflict. City's execution. delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract. agreement or order to which City is a party or by which it is bound. ( 111) Ownership of Property. City is the owner of the Original City Property.
(iv) No Litigation or Other Proceeding. To City's current actual knowledge, no litigation or other proceeding (whether administrative or otherwise) is outstanding or has been threatened which would prevent, hinder or delay the ability of City to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

Until the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. City shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section (a) not to be true. immediately give written Notice of such fact or condition to County.
3 853
(b) County’s Representations. County represents and warrants to City as follows:
(i) Authority. County is a political subdivision of the State of California. County has full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all of its obligations hereunder and the execution, performance and delivery of this Agreement by County has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of County. (ii) No Conflict. County's execution, delivery and performance of its obligations under this Agreement will not constitute a default or a breach under any contract, agreement or order to which County is a party or by which it is bound. (111) Ownership of Property. County is the owner of the Original County Property.
(iv) No Litigation or Other Proceeding. To County’s current actual knowledge, no litigation or other proceeding (whether administrative or otherwise) is outstanding or has been threatened which would prevent. hinder or delay the ability of County to perform its obligations under this Agreement.

Until the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, County shall, upon learning of any fact or condition which would cause any of the warranties and representations in this Section (b) not to be true, immediately give written Notice of such fact or condition to City. 1 .2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be fifty (50) years from the effective date of the Lease described in Section 3.1 below, unless and until earlier terminated as provided herein (''Initial Term"). The Agreement shall be automatically extended on an annual basis up to a total of ninety-nine (99) years, unless either Party notifies the other Party no later than sixty days prior to the end of the Initial Term, or the then-current term. of a Default (as defined in Section 7.2 below) under this Agreement. If the defaulting Party does not cure the Default as provided herein, the other Party may terminate this Agreement. The Initial Term in addition to any automatic extensions pursuant to this Section 1 .2 shall be referred to as the -'Term.

2. PROPERTY EXCHANGE.

2.1 Exchange of Property Interests. City and County have determined that the transfer of the property interests as provided herein will further a governmental purpose by facilitating development of the 56-Acre Property as provided in this Agreement. County will transfer certain real property concurrently with execution of the Lease at the Closing, and City and County will transfer other parcels after certain demolition work is performed. as provided in more detail below.
(a) Concurrently with execution of the Lease, County agrees to transfer to City that approximately 9.1 acres of the Original County Property to be used for the purpose of development and construction of the New Multi-Generational Center, civic center, and parking lot (collectively the "New Multi-Generational Center Site’') and grants an easement over approximately 4.8 acres of the Original County Property and Existing Recreation Center Site to be used as a right-oGway. as shown in Attachment 1 to Exhibit C. attached hereto and 4 854
incorporated herein by this reference, and referred to therein as "City of South Lake Tahoe Proposed Parcel 3-' and “Roadway & Utility Easement” (collectively. the -City Transfer Property"). In the event, all or a portion of the City Transfer Property is not developed within fifteen (15) years of the Effective Date consistent with the Master Plan, City shall transfer title and ownership of that portion of the City Transfer Property not developed as provided herein back to the County and the Lease shall be amended to incorporate such property to the Leased Property. The City Transfer Property shall be conveyed pursuant a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, which provides that title to the City Transfer Property shall revert to the County in the event that City no longer uses the City Transfer Property for public use ('-City Transfer Property Grant Deed’').
(b) Concurrently with execution of the Lease, City agrees to transfer to County that approximately 1 1 .45 acres of the Original City Property where the existing Recreation Center, excluding the ice arena, is located, as shown in Attachment I to Exhibit D, and referred to therein as ''EI Dorado County Proposed Parcel 5“ and "City of South Lake Tahoe to El Dorado County Transfer Parcel", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, the "Existing Recreation Center Site’'). The Existing Recreation Site shall be conveyed to County pursuant to a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, which provides that title to the Existing Recreation Center Site shall revert to the City in the event that County no longer uses the Existing Recreation Center Site for public use ("Existing Recreation Site Grant Deed’'). The Existing Recreation Center Site shall also be included in the Leased Property. City shall continue to operate the existing facilities on the Existing Recreation Center Site until completion of the New Multi-Generational Center, at which time City shall, at its sole cost and expense. vacate, abandon, and demolish, including removal of all Hazardous Materials, as defined in Section 5.2(b) below, the existing Recreation Center facility, in accordance with all Governmental Requirements to the satisfaction of the County ("Demolition of Existing Recreation Center Facility-). The Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility shall be completed within fifteen (15) years of the Effective Date. Upon the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Facility, City shall provide Notice to County. County shall review such Notice and may either accept completion of the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facility or provide Notice to City of such work that remains to be completed. (c) County agrees to transfer to City that approximately one acre of the Original County Property that is currently being used for a vector control facility ("Vector Control Facility"), as set forth in Attachment 1 to Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Vector Control Property’') within thirty (30) days of City's acceptance of the Demolition of the Vector Control Facility. as defined in Section 5.2(b). The Vector Control Property shall be conveyed pursuant a Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E. which provides that title to the Vector Control Property shall revert to the County in the event that City no longer uses the Vector Control Property for public use ("Vector Control Grant Deed"). Upon transfer of the Vector Control Property to City, the Vector Control Property shall be the sole responsibility of City.

2.2 As-Is Transfer. City and County specifically acknowledge that the City Transfer Property. the Existing Recreational Center Site and the Vector Control Property (collectively, the "Transfer Properties") being exchanged pursuant to the terms of this Agreement are being accepted by the transferee agency on an -AS IS WITH ALL FAULTS" basis and that neither 5 855
party is relying on any representations or warranties of any kind whatsoever, expressed or implied, from the other as to any matters concerning the properties. including without limitation :
their physical condition; geology; the development potential of the properties and their use. habitability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose; their zoning or other legal status:
compliance with law; the presence or removal of hazardous or toxic materials, substances, or wastes on, under or about the properties or any neighboring property.

2.3 Amendment to Grant Deed. In order to provide consistent restrictions among the various property deeds on the 56-Acre Property and remove restrictions that are no longer applicable. the Parties shall amend a prior Grant from County to City to modify the restrictive covenants. The Amendment to Grant Deed shall be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G ("Amendment to Grant Deed“).

2.4 Covenants. Prior to the transfer of the City Transfer Property and Vector Control Property. as applicable, County will not enter into any contract or lease or convey any real property interest. including easements, affecting the City Transfer Property or the Vector Control Property, as applicable. without City's written consent. Prior to the transfer of the Existing Recreation Center Site, City will not enter into any contract or lease or convey any real property interest, including easements, affecting the Existing Recreation Center Site, without County's wrItten consent.

3. LEASE OF CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY PROPERTY,

3.1 Lease. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. County shall lease to City and City shall ground lease from County the Leased Property, as defined below. The ground lease for the Property shall be in the form of the Ground Lease attached hereto as Exhibit E. subject to such minor revisions as may be approved by City and County (the "Lease"). City acknowledges and agrees that the Leased Property shall be used for purposes of development of governmental, recreation and community facilities to serve the community. with primary emphasis on recreation. as set forth in more detail in the Lease. Further. the Parties acknowledge that all structures and improvements on the Leased Property as of the date of the Lease are and shall be the sole property of the City and the City shall be responsible for all maintenance costs, as set forth in more detail in the Lease.

3.2 Leased Property. Prior to the Closing. the City and County shall process changes to the boundaries of the Original City Property and the Original County Property in order for the property lines to more accurately align with existing and planned facilities and structures, as shown on the Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Original County Property. as modified herein shall be referred to as the '-Leased Property." The Original City Property, as modified herein shall be referred to as the "City Property. (a) The City shall process a lot-line adjustment to modify the boundaries of the Original City Property and the Original County Property and adjust the lot-line so no structure is located on the lot line.
(b) The City shall process a Parcel Map to create a separate parcel for the real property on which the El Dorado County Library facility is located ("County Library 6 856
Property") and the parties acknowledge that the real property subject to the EMS Sublease (''ENIS Property’') is excluded from the Leased Property. Both the County Library Property and the EMS Property shall be retained by County and shall not be included in the Leased Property or subject to the terms of the Lease. City covenants that, as of the Effective Date, the City has completed lead. mold, and asbestos remediation and roof replacement on the EMS Property, and the County's ambulance service provider has initiated a major renovation project on the EMS Property, such that the City is not aware of outstanding maintenance or repair issues associated with the EMS Property. Prior to the Closing, City and County shall negotiate the termination of the existing EMS Sublease in order for County to have direct control and authority for the EMS Property and its use. City shall continue to be responsible for snow removal on the EMS Property and will assist with securing land coverage for the ambulance housing project as required by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, including but not limited to the transfer of not less than 50 square feet of City held land coverage for the project. Upon completion of the New Multi-Generational Center, the City shall be responsible for snow removal on County Library Property, which obligation shall be documented in the use agreement between the City and County for the New Multi-Generational Center as provided in Section

5.3(b) below.

3.3 Lease Rent Payments. Payments of rent for the Leased Property shall be as provided in the Lease, which provides for City to pay: (a) 50 percent (50%) of net operating profits from all existing and future revenue sources generated in the 56-Acre Property. excluding the ice arena, after the City sets aside fees from the campground on the 56- Acre Property and two percent (2%) of the total asset value of the facilities on the 56-Acre Property into a repair and replacement funds to be managed by the City; and (b) an amount equal to $200,000 (increased annually from the Effective Date) in year 30 of the Lease or retirement of debt for the New Multi-Generational Center, all as set forth in more detail in the Lease (the "Lease Rent'-).

As set forth in the Lease, County agrees to use all Lease Rent received for County infrastructure initiatives and services in the Tahoe Basin area of El Dorado County, including. but not limited to. roads, trails, facilities, and utilities.

3.4 County Property Subleases. The existing County Property Subleases shall remain in full force and effect under this Agreement and the Lease, as set forth in more detail therein. City shall also have authority to enter into further subleases consistent with the terms of the Lease.

3.5 Extension of County Lease Agreements. The County Lease Agreements are hereby extended and remain in full force and effect until the date the Lease is fully executed and effective.

3.6 Termination of Original 56-Acre Agreements. Upon full execution of the Lease, the Original 56-Acre Agreements shall be terminated and of no further force and effect.

4. CLOSING.

4.1 Title Review. Each Party may request title reports for the various parcels that comprise the 56-Acre Property and may work with a title company, at its sole cost and expense. to purchase title insurance for any property being accepted by such party prior to acceptance. In 7 857
the event there are any exceptions on title to any property required to be transferred herein that impact the transferee's ability to develop the property consistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Parties shall coordinate to remove such title exceptions prior to transfer.

4.2 Execution and Recordation of Lease, City Transfer Grant Deed and Amendment to Grant Deed. Within five business days of the satisfaction of the City and County Conditions Precedent to Closing, the City and County shall execute the Lease and the Amendment to Grant Deed and shall have the Lease or a Memorandum of Lease recorded against the Leased Property and the Amended Grant Deed recorded (''Closing").

4.3 City’s Conditions Precedent to Closing. City's obligation to proceed with the Lease is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by City of each and all of the conditions precedent described below (''City Conditions Precedent to Closing”). City’s Conditions Precedent to Lease are solely for the benefit of City and shall be fulfilled or waived within the time periods provided for herein :
(a) No Default. County shall not be in Default under this Agreement and no event shall have occurred which with the passage of time or giving of notice or both would constitute a default hereunder.
(b) Leased Property. City and County shall have adjusted the property lines of the Original City Property and the Original County Property as provided in Section 3.2.

Exhibit F.
(C) Lease. County shall have executed the Lease in the form attached as (d) Grant Deeds. County shall have executed the City Transfer Property Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit C.
(e) Amendment to Grant Deed. County shall have executed the Amendment to Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit G. (f) CEQA. No legal challenge has been fIled under CEQA within the applicable time period.

4.4 County’s Conditions Precedent to Closing. County's obligation to proceed with the Lease is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by County of each and all of the conditions precedent described below (“County Conditions Precedent to Closing"). which are solely for the benefit of County, and which shall be fulfilled or waived within the time periods provided for herein
(a) No Default by City. City shall not be in Default under this Agreement. and no event shall have occurred which with the passage of time or giving of notice or both would constitute a default hereunder.
(b) Leased Property. City and County shall have adjusted the property lines of the Original City Property and the Original County Property as provided in Section 3.2. 8 858
(C) Lease. City shall have executed the Lease in the form attached as Exhibit F.
(d) Grant Deed. City shall have executed a Certificate of Acceptance to the City Transfer Property Grant Deed.
(e) Amendment to Grant Deed. City shall have executed the Amendment to Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit G.
(f) CEQA. No legal challenge has been filed under CEQA within the applicable time period.
5 DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE 56-ACRES.

5.1 City Development. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, City shall have the sole authority over the development, operation and use of the 56-Acre Property. including without limitation. the Leased Property. and may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion. the type and nature of any and all improvements to be located on the 56-Acre Property, subject to the use requirements set forth in Section 6.1 below. The City authority described herein shall include the sole responsibility for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of all existing and new improvements on the 56-Acre Property, subject to the exceptions set forth in Section 5.2 below. County and City staff will work cooperatively in the development, construction, operation and maintenance of the 56-Acre Property.

5.2 Exceptions to City Authority and Responsibility. The following are the only exceptions to the City's sole authority and responsibility over the 56-Acre Property:
(a) County shall retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the EMS Property and the County Library Property, which is not included in the Leased Property and shall not be subject to the terms of the Lease, and all improvements and facilities located thereon
(b) County shall vacate, abandon, and demolish, including removal of all Hazardous Materials, as defined below. the Vector Control Facility, in accordance with all Governmental Requirements to the satisfaction of the City (''Demolition of Vector Control Facility’'). The Demolition of the Vector Control Facility shall be completed no later than fifteen (15) years after the Effective Date. Demolition of the Vector Control Facility is expressly contingent upon finding approximately one (1 ) acre of improved City-owned real property that County determines, in its reasonable discretion, is a suitable site for a new vector control facility ("New Vector Control Site"), which shall be transferred by City to County at no cost with full coverage credits. In the event that City and County have not agreed upon the New Vector Control Site within thirteen (13) years of the Effective Date. City and County shall meet and confer to ensure that an agreement is reached as to a reasonable site within the 15-year timeframe set forth herein. Upon the Demolition of the Vector Control Facility. County shall provide Notice to City. City shall review such Notice and may either accept completion of the Demolition of the Vector Control or provide Notice to County of such work that remains to be completed. The Vector Control Property shall be transferred to City as provided in Section

2.1 (c). “Hazardous Materials ’' means any substance, material. or waste which is or becomes 9 859
regulated by any local governmental authority, the State of California, or the United States Government, including any material or substance which is: (i) defined as a ''hazardous waste, "extremejy hazardous waste," or ''restricted hazardous waste” under Sections 251 15, 25117 or 25122.7, or listed pursuant to Section 25140 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law); (ii) defined as a "hazardous substance" under Section 2531 6 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act); (iii) defined as a "hazardous material,” ''hazardous substance.’' or ''hazardous waste“ under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory); (iv) defined as a ''hazardous substance’' under Section 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances); (v) petroleum; (vi) friable asbestos; (vii) polychlorinated biphenyls; (viii) listed under Article 9 or defined as “hazardous’' or ''extremely hazardous” pursuant to Article 1 1 of Title 22 of the California Administrative Code. Division 4, Chapter 20; (ix) designated as "hazardous substances’' pursuant to Section 31 1 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. $ 131 7); (x) defined as a ''hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1 004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. 42 U.S.C. $690 1. et sea. (42 U.S.C. $6903); or (xi) defined as ''hazardous substances’' pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation. and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §9601 , el seq.. as the foregoing statutes and regulations now exist or may hereafter be amended.
(c) Each Party shall be responsible for any and all costs associated with environmental remediation or Hazardous Materials on the real property. facilities or structures on the 56-Acre Property that it owns as of the Effective Date. Each Party shall be responsible for conducting Phase 1 investigations and testing upon undertaking any project on its real property. (d) City shall provide a location for the County's senior nutrition programs in existing or new City facilities located on the 56-Acre Property pursuant to the terms of a use agreement to be entered into between the Parties. County's programs and the operating costs associated with the programs shall be the sole responsibility of County.

5.3 Multi-Generational Center. The City shall endeavor to construct the New Multi-Generational Center on the 56-Acre Property as described in the Master Plan, subject to the following requirements:
(a) City shall be responsible for all design and construction costs associated with the New Multi-Generational Center and shall own and operate the New Multi-Generational Center
(b) The City shall allocate approximately 9,000 square feet of space in the New Multi-Generational Center for the purpose of providing older adult services and programs.

The space shall include a commercial kitchen and dining room for the purpose of accommodating the County Senior Nutrition Program and allowing shared use with the City.

County's use shall be documented in a separate use agreement between the Parties. The use agreement shall also include provisions providing for City's obligation to be responsible for snow removal on County Library Property upon completion of the New Multi-Generational Center. The City shall manage the space in order to maximize the use of all elements in the New 10 860
Multi-Generational Center for programs that benefit all user groups in the community. As part of the annual review set forth in Section 7.1 below, the Parties shall discuss programs and priorities of use in the New Multi-Generational Center, including City's commitment to serving seniors in the New Multi-Generational Center and allocation of staff or resources dedicated to older adult services and programs coordination.
(c) City shall be responsible for all Maintenance Costs, as defined below, associated with the New Multi-Generational Center and County shall be responsible for the Operating Costs. as defined below, of its programs and use of the New Multi-Generational Center. City and County shall share the Replacement Costs, as defined below, based on each Party's proportionate use of the facilities. The cost allocations provided herein shall be documented in the County and City use agreement described in Section 5.3(b) above. (i) "Operating Costs“ shall include costs to operate the County senior nutrition programs, including staff costs, costs to fund all programming, and cleaning of the commercial kitchen and dining room after County use.
(ii) -Maintenance Costs" shall include costs to maintain the building, parking area, hardscape, sidewalks, landscaping, and any equipment attached to the building whose removal would do harm to the structure, such as the foundation. roof, ventilation, plumbing, electrical, fire suppression, heating, and windows. (iii) "Replacement Costs" shall include replacement of any equipment or appliances in the commercial kitchen and dining facilities. (d) The existing Senior Center facility shall remain in operation until the completion of the New Multi-Generational Center. Upon completion of the New MultiGenerational Center, County. at its option, may elect to continue providing older adult services program at the existing Senior Center facility pursuant to the terms of the Lease.

5.4 Development of Existing Recreation Center Site. Upon completion of the Demolition of the Existing Recreation Center Facit ity, either Party may request that this Agreement be re-opened for good faith negotiations between the Parties to address redevelopment and re-use of the Existing Recreation Center Site. The Parties agree and acknowledge that it is anticipated the Existing Recreation Center Site will be developed as a government facility for shared use between County and City.

5.5 Historical Structures. In a manner consistent with the Master Plan, the City shall endeavor to adequately preserve all historically-significant buildings currently located on the 56-Acre Property and to locate and design any new recreational or government facilities in a manner that is complementary to the historically-significant buildings as identified in the Master Plan

5.6 City Leases. The City shall have sole discretion over leases of the City Property, including without limitation, the extension or termination of such leases, provided however that any and all leases between the City and a third party shall be in compliance with the general use guidelines set forth in this Agreement. With respect to the Leased Property, City shall have the right to maintain any subleases in effect as of the Effective Date and to sublease the Leased 11 861
Property to any other government entity or local community non-profit. Any other subleases of the L.eased Property require County’s prior approval.

5.7 Compliance with Laws; Indemnity and Waiver. Both City and County shall carry out all work and development under this Agreement. including County's demolition of the Vector Control Facility and City-s development on the 56-Acre Property, in conformity with all applicable laws. ordinances, statutes. codes, rules. regulations, orders and decrees, of the United States, the State of California, the County of El Dorado. the City. and of any other political subdivision or instrumentality exercising jurisdiction over the 56-Acre Property (collectively, the "Governmental Requirements"). including all state labor laws and standards; the County zoning and development standards; building. plumbing. mechanical and electrical codes; all other provisions of the City Municipal Code; and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including the Americans With Disabilities Act. 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq ..

Government Code Section 4450, et seq .. Government Code Section 1 1135, et seq.. and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 5 1 , et seq. Each Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party and its officers, employees. volunteers, agents and representatives from and against any and all present and future liabilities. obligations, orders, claims, damages, fines, penalties and expenses. including attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of or in any way connected with the first Party's failure to comply with all Governmental Requirements.

6. USE REQUIREMENTS.

6.1 Governmental Community Use. The City shall develop, operate and maintain the 56-Acre Property, except as set forth in Section 5.2 above, for recreation and government facilities, with primary emphasis on recreation. to serve the residents and visitors of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County. In the event City desires to use the 56- Acre Property for any use other than set forth in this Section 6.1. City may submit a written request for a use exception to the County. County shall consider such request in its reasonable discretion and respond in writing to City within 30 days of receipt of the request.

6.2 County Resident Use. ’l'he City shall allow residents of El Dorado County that do not reside within the City limits to use existing and new recreation facilities on the 56-Acre Property under the same policies and fee schedule applicable to City residents.

7. ANNUAL REVIEW, DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES.

7.1 Annual Review. The Parties shall meet at least once a year prior to the anniversary date of the Effective Date to review the status of the terms of the Agreement and to ensure adequate communication and strengthen the relationship between the Parties. Prior to the annual meeting date, each Party shall submit to the other Party an update on its compliance with the terms and obligations of this Agreement.

7.2 Default Remedies. Failure by either Party to perform any action or covenant required by this Agreement within the time periods provided herein following Notice shall constitute a “Default" under this Agreement. A Party claiming a Default shall give written Notice of Default to the other Party specifying the Default complained of. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. the claimant shall not institute any proceeding against the 12 862
other Party if such Party within 60 days following receipt of such Notice of Default immediately, with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay and completes such cure. correction or remedy with diligence

7.3 Dispute Resolution. In the event that the Party receiving a Notice of Default disputes the allegations or is not intending to cure, correct or remedy the alleged default, the Parties shall promptly meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues raised, mediation may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the Parties to the extent possible that litigation be avoided as a method of dispute resolution.

7.4 Institution of Legal Actions. Except as otherwise specitlcally provided herein, upon the occurrence of a Default. the Parties have the right, in addition to any other rights or remedies. to institute any action at law or in equity to cure. correct. prevent or remedy any Default, or to recover damages for any Default. or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. The Parties remedies in the event of a Default shall be limited to obtaining specific performance or injunctive relief. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of El Dorado, State of California. or in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of the State of California. Neither Party shall have the right to recover any consequential. punitive or special damages.

7.5 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of the Parties or upon satisfaction of all terms and obligations set forth herein and not otherwise addressed in the Lease or the Amended Grant Deed.

7.6 Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it. at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party, except as otherwise expressly provided herein

7.7 Inaction Not a Waiver of Default. Any failures or delays by either Party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any Default shall not operate as a waiver of any Default or of any such rights or remedies. or deprive either such Party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect. assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.

8. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

8. 1 No Assignment. The qualifications and identity of the Parties are of particular concern and material considerations for entering into this Agreement. Neither Party shall have the right during the Term to assign all or any portion of its rights, obligations or interests under this Agreement.

8.2 Mutual Indemnity.
(a) County shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to City), protect and hold City and its officers, employees. agents and representatives, harmless from any and all liabilities. obligations, orders. claims, damages, fines. penalties and expenses. 13 863
including attorneys' fees and costs (“Claims") to the extent caused by any of County’s activities under this Agreement or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by County and whether such Claims shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.
(b) City shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to County), protect and hold County and its offIcers. employees, agents and representatives. harmless from any and all Claims to the extent caused by any of City-s activities under this Agreement or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by City and whether such Claims shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Notices, Demands and Communications between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice (-'Notice") which either Party may desire to give to the other Party under this Agreement must be in writing and shall be given by certified mail. return receipt requested and postage prepaid. personal delivery. or reputable overnight courier (but not by facsimile or email), to the Party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the Party as set forth below, or at any other address as that Party may later designate by Notice.

I-o City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 L.isa Vlaloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Joseph D. Irvin. City Manager
Fo County: El Dorado County
Chief Administrative Office
330 Fair Lane
Placerville. CA 95667
Don Ashton. County Chief Administrative Officer
Any Notice shall be deemed received on the date of delivery if delivered by personal service, on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the return receipt if sent by certified mail, and on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the records of the overnight courier if sent via nationally recognized overnight courier. Notices sent by a Party's attorney on behalf of such Party shall be deemed delivered by such Party.

8.4 Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance. Subject to the limitations set forth below, performance by either Party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in Default. and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where delays are due to: war; insurrection; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; mres; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions: freight embargoes; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation, including court delays; or unusually severe weather; acts or omissions of the other Party. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if Notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within 30 days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of City and County. 14 864

8.5 Relationship between City and County. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between City and County is not that of a joint venture and that City and County shall not be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other.

8.6 Approvals and Actions. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by either Party, the City Manager of City or County Chief Administrative Officer of County, as applicable, or his or her designee is authorized to act on behalf of such Party, unless specifically provided otherwise or the context requires otherwise.

8.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

8.8 Integration. This Agreement, including the exhibits hereto, contain the entire understanding between the Parties relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

Each Party is entering this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each Party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such Party deems material.

8.9 Titles and Captions. Titles and captions are for convenience of reference only and do not defIne, describe or limit the scope or the intent of this Agreement or of any of its terms. References to section numbers are to sections in this Agreement. unless expressly stated otherwise. References to specific section numbers shall include all subsections which follow the referenced section.

8.10 Interpretation. As used in this Agreement. masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The words ''include" and "including'- shall be construed as if followed by the words -without limitation.’' The Parties acknowledge that each Party and his. her or its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that the rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any document executed and delivered by either Party in connection with this Agreement.

8.1 1 Modifications. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective. shall be made in writing and in each instance signed on behalf of each Party.

8.12 Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any Party or circumstances shall be held, to any extent. invalid or unenforceable. the remainder of this Agreement. or the application of the term. provision, condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected. and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

8.1 3 Computation of Time. The time in which any act is to be done under this Agreement is computed by excluding the first day, and including the last day. unless the last day is a holiday or Saturday or Sunday. and then that day is also excluded. The term -holiday’' shall mean all holidays as specified in Sections 6700 and 6701 of the California Government Code. If any act is to be done by a particular time during a day, that time shall be Pacific Time Zone time. 15 865

8.1 4 Legal Advice. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following:
they have carefully read this Agreement. and in signing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other Party, or their respective agents, employees. or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement.

8.1 5 Time of Essence. Time is expressly made of the essence with respect to the performance by City and County of each and every obligation and condition of this Agreement.

8.16 Mutual Cooperation. Each Party agrees to cooperate with the other to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement and, in that regard, shall execute any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary. helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement.

8.1 7 Conflicts of Interest. No member. oftlcial or employee of County or City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation. partnership or association in which he is directly or indirectly interested.

8. 1 8 Non-liability of Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee of either Party shall be personally liable to the other Party. in the event of any Default. breach or for any amount which may become due. or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

Each Party hereby waives and releases any claim it may have against the members, oftlcials or employees of the other Party with respect to any Default. breach or for any amount which may become due under the terms of this Agreement.

8.19 Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California. without regard to conflict of laws principles. shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.

6.20 Contract Administrators. The County officer or employee with responsibility for administration of this Agreement is Don Ashton. Chief Administrative Officer. or successor.

The City officer or employee for responsibility for administration of this Lease is Joe Irvin, City Manager. or successor.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blankl
16 866
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

CITY: COUNTY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
EL DORADO COUNTY, a political
subdivisiot rnla
By: B
By ) isors
ayor
By
Heather Stroud. City Attorne;
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: aP LI /1 m rk
ATTEST:

B)
Clerk
17 C - U, 7– :Lnx\ 867
s/4}}#iT/
L 44 f
--'-'-+
LA & f
\B,b
t:IA
R
/
dIP
R /
fi - su _ R_ .

I I C == fHE ? ! I; To ra dar
B
R
JR
dR
al .- -–-
R
&B
& le ;
TEr:{t::?i: { a:IIbI
R
\
R
R ++ R
R
8 ( )\r )1( L ; I
'S
R
q:?!)rR -1 - \
FOr V
868

EXHIBIT B

MASTER PLAN
++
I
LAKE!!TYly::IIng; he+
LAKE TAHOE #

TALL AC AVE
''.\ ,
8 rt t
t
on 100
n. LI G
869

EXHIBIT C

CITY TRANSFER PROPERTY GRANT DEED
Recorded at the Request of and
When Recorded Mail to:

City of South Lake Tahoe
1 901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe. CA 96150
Attention: Joe Irvin. City Manager
Document Entitled to Free
Recordation Pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383

NO TAX DUE

GRANT DEED
(EL DORADO COUNTY TO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE)
WHEREAS. the City of South Lake Tahoe. a municipal corporation (''City") and El Dorado County. a political subdivision of the State of California ("County") have entered into that certain Agreement for Development, Operation and Maintenance of the 56-Acre Property dated to set forth the terms and conditions relating to among other things ( 1 ) the amendment and restatement of a series of prior agreements regarding the lease and development of certain real property located within the County and City referred to as the 56-Acre Property; (2) City and County transfers of certain City and County-owned property to effectuate development of the 56- Acre Property; (3) the lease of certain property to City for City's ongoing development and use of the 56-Acre Property in accordance with a City-approved Master Plan; and (4) County's use of certain portions of the 56- Acre Property (the "56-Acre Agreement'-); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 56-Acre Agreement, County has agreed to transfer to City approximately 9.1 acres, resulting in an approximately 10.2-acre site when combined with existing City parcel for the purpose of development and construction of a new Multi-Generational Center. civic center, and parking lot, approximately 0.66 acres where the Ice Arena building is encroaching on County-owned property, and to grant easements over an approximately 4.8 acre site to be used as a right-of-way. in exchange for the City's grant to County of an approximately 11 .45 acre site for County governmental or recreational use.

NOW THEREFORE. the County does hereby grant to City, any and all right, title and interest in the real property located in the County of El Dorado, and described and depicted in Attachment 1 attached hereto. and referred to therein as ''City of South Lake Tahoe Proposed Parcel 3" ("Property'’) for public use. County further does hereby grant to the City a roadway Exhibit C- I
870
and utility easement as further depicted in Attachment 1 attached hereto, and referred to therein as -Roadway and Utility Easement." The Property shall be used for public use. Private residential, commercial, or industrial uses shall not be permitted; provided, however, that commercial uses clearly subservient and accessory to a public use shall be permitted. In the event the Property is not used for public use as provided herein, title and interest to the Property shall revert to the County.

Executed this day of . 202
COUNTY:

EL DORADO COUNTY. a political
subdivision of the State of California
By:

Exhibit C-2
871

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
)
)
On , before me,
Date
Jane Doe, Notary Public")
Name And TItle Of Officer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument,
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Mrma7)
Exhibit C-3
872

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated , from the County of El Dorado to the City of South Lake Tahoe (''City") is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. . adopted by the City Council on , and the grantee consents to the recordation of the Grant Deed on behalf of the City.

Dated :

CITY:

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE. a
municipal corporation
By:

Exhibit C-4
873

ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOTARY FOR CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF )
)
On
Date
Jane Doe. Notary PUbIIC“)
before me
Name And TItle Of Officer (e g
personally appeared
Name of SIgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s)
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY
under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal
TdTanre avt©m6iE
Exhibit C-5
874
ATTACHMENT 1

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Exhibit C-6
875
JN819S.001
City PcI 3.docx
2/11/2022
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE PROPOSED PARCEL 3

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property situate in Lot 1 of Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, County of El Dorado, City of South Lake Tahoe, State of California, and being a portion of Tract A as said Tract shown and delineated on that certain Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder and being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast Corner of said Section 32:

Thence from said Point of Commencement, along the Easterly line of said Section 32, North 00'20’03” West a distance of 1321.81 feet;
Thence continuing aFong said Easterly Section Line, North 00'15’50” West a distance of 775.91 feet to a point situate on the southerly Right-of-Way line of U,S. 50; Thence leaving said Section Line, along the aforementioned southerly Right-of-Way line, South 73'47’02” West a distance of 314.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning:

Thence from said True Point of Beginning, continuing along said southerly Right-of-Way line of U.S Highway 50, South 73'47’02” West a distance of 210.75 feet to a point of curvature; Thence continuing along said southerly Right-of-Way line, southerly and westerly 572.08 feet along the arc of a 990.00 foot radius tangent curve to the left through a central angle of 33'06’32"; Thence leaving said southerly Right-of-Way line, South 34'27’10" East a distance of 514.27 feet; Thence South 88'31’49" East a distance of 141.66 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03" West a distance of 90.63 feet;
Thence North 89'49’56" East a distance of 489.99 feet;
Thence North 00'20’03” West a distance of 11.36 feet;
Thence North 00'15’50” West a distance of 140.28 feet;
Thence leaving said proposed westerly Right-of-Way line, North 89'54’15" West a distance of 245.35 feet;
Thence North 00'04’52” East a distance of 547.79 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 9.112 acres of land, more or less.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is the aforementioned Record of Survey filed for record on November 16, 1988 in Book 16 of Records of Surveys at Page 30 in the office of the El Dorado County Recorder

Page 1 of 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting