Brentwood City Council
July 1, 2025

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
1 1 LS $4,800.00 $4,800.00
2 1 Unit $19.00 $19.00
3 1 Unit $17.00 $17.00
4 1 LF $0.45 $0.45
5 Per Hour $600.00 $600.00
6 Per Order $500.00 $500.00
TOTAL: $5,936.45
No Response No Response
Chris Pengilly
No Bid No Bid

DESCRIPTION
Demolition and Rack Back (10' x 15' Section)
6 x 8 x 20 Dualtex Split Face Random Score - Tan
6 x 8 x 16 Split Face - Tan
Shipping and Tax Included
#9 Ladder Wire
Traffic Control
Mold Fee for Special Order Items
David Hall Masonry

TABULATION OF BIDS
209.599.8722
4/4/2025
REASON: Only response received.

Eddie Erdelatz
[email protected]
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Sound Wall Repairs and Replacement 310 N. Cluff Avenue #205
Lodi, CA 95240
651 S. Stockton Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
747 Wilshire Avenue, Unit B
Stockton, CA 95203
David Hall Masonry John D. Wait Masonry Pengilly Masonry [email protected]
209.334.6722
Jasmine Olds
No Response No Response
[email protected]
209.467.7722

TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION
FY 2025-2026
Rates
FY 2026-2027
Rates
FY 2025-2026
Rates
FY 2026-2027
Rates
1 $1,623.00 $1,672.00 $2,950.00 $3,245.00
2 $5,923.00 $6,101.00 $7,265.00 $7,990.00
3 $1,947.00 $2,005.00 $3,150.00 $3,465.00
4 $6,129.00 $6,313.00 $8,150.00 $8,965.00
5 $1,622.00 $1,671.00 $3,150.00 $3,465.00
6 $5,750.00 $5,923.00 $8,350.00 $9,185.00
7 $1,622.00 $1,671.00 $3,650.00 $4,015.00
8 $5,923.00 $6,101.00 $8,450.00 $9,295.00
9 $1,622.00 $1,671.00 $3,500.00 $3,850.00
10 $5,923.00 $6,101.00 $8,150.00 $8,965.00
11 $172.00 $177.00 $185.00 $205.00
12 $108.00 $111.00 $250.00 $275.00
TOTAL: $38,364.00 $39,517.00 $57,200.00 $62,920.00 No Bid 3/19/2025
Dillon Electric
P.O. Box 187 Oakley, CA 94561
No Response
925-679-3932
Dave
Tennyson Electric Inc.
7275 National Drive Livermore, CA
34550
3/19/2025
925-606-1038
Mike Tennyson
DC Electric Group Inc.
40 Berry Drive Pacheco, CA 94553
925-293-9455
John Abraham
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Street Light Pole Repair and Replacement
Remove/replace Cobra streetlight pole
No Bid
DC Electric Group Inc.

Crane truck hourly rate
Above quotes must include disposal fee.

Light poles/fixtures will be supplied by the City
of Brentwood.

Lowest responsible bid.

Remove/replace Lumec pole/fixture
Remove/replace Lumec pole/fixture/base
Remove/replace Atio pole/fixture
Remove/replace Atio pole/fixture/base
Electrician hourly rate
Remove/replace Cobra streetlight pole/base
Remove/replace arterial Cobra double arm pole
Remove/replace arterial Cobra double arm pole/base
Remove/replace Hadco pole/fixture
Remove/replace Hadco pole/fixture/base

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Fence Replacement, Repairs and Supplies RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 30 $67.00 $2,010.00 $66.90 $2,007.00
2 1 $1,304.00 $1,304.00 $1,320.00 $1,320.00
Hourly Rates:
3 1 Regular repair rate per hour $200.00 $200.00 $130.00 $130.00 4 1 Emergency repair rate per hour $235.00 $235.00 $145.00 $145.00 5 1 Overtime repair rate per hour $300.00 $300.00 $185.00 $185.00 HOURLY RATES SUB-TOTAL: $735.00 $460.00
Material Rates:
6 1 1/4 yard 6 sack $201.00 $201.00 $80.00 $80.00
7 1 1/2 yard 6 sack $216.00 $216.00 $169.00 $169.00
8 1 3/4 yard 6 sack $230.00 $230.00 $238.00 $238.00
9 1 1 yard 5 sack $253.00 $253.00 $270.00 $270.00
10 1 1/2 yard 5 sack $210.00 $210.00 $162.00 $162.00
11 1 1 yard 4 sack $241.00 $241.00 $245.00 $245.00
12 1 1/2 yard 4 sack $187.00 $187.00 $170.00 $170.00
MATERIAL RATES SUB-TOTAL: $1,538.00 $1,334.00
1 yard 6 sack (line added by Delta Fence, not included in total ) $267.00 $290.37 TOTAL: $5,587.00 $5,121.00

TABULATION OF BIDS
Delta Fence Company, Inc.

Sylvia Stanley Brett Finberg
925.606.8167
3/28/2024
925.634.5990 209.637.9484
Delta Fence Company, Inc. Finberg Fencing, Inc. Chain Link Fence and Supply No Bid
Multi-Award - Quotes received were similar overall for many items. Given that each project may still be quoted separately, it makes sense to have two contracts. This will allow flexibility with supplly availability and/or time constraint issues for projects.

Staff will use the lowest price vendor per project when possible. 12154 Royal Ann Ct.

Brentwood, CA 94513
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 7650 Hawthorne Ave., Suite 2
Livermore, CA 94550
3/22/2024
6901 Brentwood Blvd.

Brentwood, CA 94513

NO RESPONSE
6' High Black Vinyl Clain Link - 30' Long Installed. Price to include posts, brackets, rails, bands, caps, ties, nuts, bolts, and anything else to complete job. Include tax and delivery.
4' Walk Gate Single Opening Installed. Price to include posts, fittings, and bracing to install walk gate into an existing fence.

Include tax and delivery

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Commercial Tires and Service for City Fleet RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION
FY 2024/25
Rates
FY 2025/26
Rates
FY 2024/25
Rates
FY 2025/26
Rates
1 1 315/80R22.5 New Goodyear 296 20 ply $493.83 $493.83 2 1 315/80R22.5 Waste Hauler Recap $329.00 $339.00
3 1 11R22.5 New Goodyear 751 16 ply $557.83 $557.83
4 1 11R22.5 Waste Hauler Recap $235.00 $245.00
5 1 255/70R22.5 New XZE 16 ply $459.61 $459.61
6 1 Hourly Rate (In Shop) N/C N/C
7 1 Hourly Rate (On-Site) $130.00 $135.00 $132.00 $132.00 8 1 Mounting Fee $22.00 $24.00 $24.50 $24.50
9 1 Flat Repair $45.00 $50.00 $47.50 $47.50
10 1 Fuel Charge (Per Trip) N/C N/C $15.00 $15.00
11 1 Trip Charge N/C N/C No trip charge No trip charge
12 1 After Hours Charge N/C N/C $161.00 $161.00
13 1 Tire Disposal Fee- Truck $13.00 $14.00 $18.50 $18.50 14 1 Tire Disposal Fee- Passenger $6.00 $7.00 $10.00 $10.00 TOTAL: $2,291.27 $2,325.27 Disqualified
Did not bid per specs
Did not bid per specs
Did not bid per specs
Did not bid per specs
Did not bid per specs
Did not bid per specs
925-825-5252 925-513-3432

TABULATION OF BIDS
East Bay Tire Company, Inc.

Lowest responsible bid.

David Sheeley
East Bay Tire Company, Inc. Les Schwab Tire
No Bid
No Bid
Goodyear Commercial Tires
6361 Lone Tree Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 4105 N. Wilcox Road
Stockton, CA 95215
3/12/2024 NO RESPONSE
545 Bliss Ave.

Pittsburg, CA 94565
Sean Kinnick Jason White
209-931-4442
3/12/2024

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Fence Replacement, Repairs and Supplies RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 30 $67.00 $2,010.00 $66.90 $2,007.00
2 1 $1,304.00 $1,304.00 $1,320.00 $1,320.00
Hourly Rates:
3 1 Regular repair rate per hour $200.00 $200.00 $130.00 $130.00 4 1 Emergency repair rate per hour $235.00 $235.00 $145.00 $145.00 5 1 Overtime repair rate per hour $300.00 $300.00 $185.00 $185.00 HOURLY RATES SUB-TOTAL: $735.00 $460.00
Material Rates:
6 1 1/4 yard 6 sack $201.00 $201.00 $80.00 $80.00
7 1 1/2 yard 6 sack $216.00 $216.00 $169.00 $169.00
8 1 3/4 yard 6 sack $230.00 $230.00 $238.00 $238.00
9 1 1 yard 5 sack $253.00 $253.00 $270.00 $270.00
10 1 1/2 yard 5 sack $210.00 $210.00 $162.00 $162.00
11 1 1 yard 4 sack $241.00 $241.00 $245.00 $245.00
12 1 1/2 yard 4 sack $187.00 $187.00 $170.00 $170.00
MATERIAL RATES SUB-TOTAL: $1,538.00 $1,334.00
1 yard 6 sack (line added by Delta Fence, not included in total ) $267.00 $290.37 TOTAL: $5,587.00 $5,121.00 No Bid
Multi-Award - Quotes received were similar overall for many items. Given that each project may still be quoted separately, it makes sense to have two contracts. This will allow flexibility with supplly availability and/or time constraint issues for projects.

Staff will use the lowest price vendor per project when possible. 12154 Royal Ann Ct.

Brentwood, CA 94513
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 7650 Hawthorne Ave., Suite 2
Livermore, CA 94550
3/22/2024
6901 Brentwood Blvd.

Brentwood, CA 94513

NO RESPONSE
6' High Black Vinyl Clain Link - 30' Long Installed. Price to include posts, brackets, rails, bands, caps, ties, nuts, bolts, and anything else to complete job. Include tax and delivery.
4' Walk Gate Single Opening Installed. Price to include posts, fittings, and bracing to install walk gate into an existing fence.

Include tax and delivery

TABULATION OF BIDS
Finberg Fencing, Inc.

Sylvia Stanley Brett Finberg
925.606.8167
3/28/2024
925.634.5990 209.637.9484
Delta Fence Company, Inc. Finberg Fencing, Inc. Chain Link Fence and Supply

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 BFAC $17,246.11 $21,944.00 $33,835.00
2 Library $30,351.86 $31,322.00 $34,556.00
3 Heritage High School Pool Bldg $10,320.00 $9,948.56 $8,700.00 4 City Hall $71,856.10 $61,248.00 $82,440.00
5 Community Center $25,868.63 $34,428.00 $58,900.00
6 Parking Garage $3,899.17 $6,864.00 $17,150.00
7 Police Dept. $44,892.00 $36,332.67 $48,250.00
8 Police Sub-Station $2,993.00 $1,839.80 $5,960.00
9 Public Works (MSC, Solid Waste, Wastewater, Fleet Bldgs.) $32,191.66 $38,604.00 $43,850.00 10 Women's Club $4,644.00 $1,839.80 $6,595.00
11 Senior Center $18,060.00 $15,699.64 $43,450.00
$181,413.53 $194,410.00 $270,731.00
TOTAL: $262,322.53 $260,070.47 $383,686.00
HIGHLIGHTED TOTALS:

TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Provide Janitorial Services for Various Buildings and Facilities Frank & Grossman Landscape Contractors, Inc.

Lowest Responsible bid for certain facilities
(highlighted). City Hall and the Community Center
(Civic Center) were awarded to same contractor.

Award for 2-year contract (2022/23 - 2023/24) with
option to extend an additional two years. Rick Oropeza William Martinez Donald Jacko Sr. 415-828-3946 925-934-5533 510-568-5951
Frank & Grossman Landscape
Contractors, Inc.

Universal Building Services and
Supply Company, Inc. Dad Services
1717 Solano Way, #29
Concord, CA 94523
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 6681 Foothill Blvd
Oakland, CA 94605
311 Depot Rd.

Hayward, CA 94545

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 $174.20 $202.13 $262.13 $224.00 $249.55
2 1 $685.48 $767.11 $768.06 $754.38 $757.74
3 1 $275.78 $281.62 $284.78 $303.42 $293.70
4 1 $165.89 $173.12 $169.75 $182.48 $175.87
5 1 $138.42 $142.81 $151.95 $144.90 $185.34
6 1 $1,141.59 $1,302.14 $1,313.40 $1,260.10 $1,311.64
7 1 $239.73 $247.51 $289.96 $270.00 $170.33
8 1 $38.14 $38.00 $46.67 $40.67 $47.22
9 1 $94.95 $108.77 $109.06 $121.00 $109.97
10 1 $394.35 $406.61 $486.68 $428.24 $449.30
11 1 $439.25 $473.20 $474.05 $510.00 $480.95
12 1 $4,699.84 $4,957.02 $5,162.84 $5,221.00 $5,213.47
$19.00 $14.00 $19.00 $19.00 $0.00
$331.43 $0.00 $381.19 $827.77 $826.44
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49.99
TOTAL: $8,838.05 $9,114.04 $9,919.52 $10,306.96 $10,321.51 Apple 10.9-inch iPad WiFi 10th gen - 256 GB
EcoStruxure IT Expert Access - 1 year - 100 node
eWaste
Shipping
Tax

DESCRIPTION
Cisco IP Phone 7841 - Desk phone
Lenovo ThinkCentre M70q Gen5 - PC
Lenovo ThinkCentre Tiny-in-One 24 Gen5 - 24" Monitor
DYMO LabelWriter 550
HP LaserJet Pro 3301fdw - Printer
Lenovo ThinkVision T24 - 24" Monitor for Dual Monitor
CyberPower Intelligent LCD - Desktop UPS
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen3 - Laptop
Jabra Engage 65 Mono - Headset
Jabra LINK - hook switch
Damon Tobacco
[email protected]
Ethan Mcleod
[email protected]
954.225.8092
Keith Nguyen
[email protected]
312.705.0246 ext 50246 732.317.3688
Tommy Baxter
[email protected]
925.412.3640
Christian Grejsen
[email protected]
GHA Technologies Inc.

TABULATION OF BIDS
404.689.5568
2/25/2025
Multi-Award Procurement - The nature of purchasing
Technology Goods and Software will require us to
purchase from not only the lowest bidder but also from
the one who can provide the needed goods. Often
vendors are out of stock. To prevent delays in
purchasing, we must utilize mulitple vendors.

REASON:
2/25/2025 2/25/2025
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Technology Goods and Software
2300 NW 55th Court, Suite 110
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
2537 Cedarcrest Rd, Ste 305 #48
Acworth, GA 30101
290 Davidson Avenue
Somerset, NJ 08873
Knight Technology Group Strictly Technology LLC CDW Government, LLC SHI International Corp. 200 N. Milwaukee Avenue
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
3/7/2025
GHA Technologies Inc.
8998 E Raintree Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
2/25/2025

RECOMMEND:

VENDOR: 4LEAF, Inc.

Independent Code
Consultants, Inc. (ICCI) Shums Coda Associates TRB+ Associates ADDRESS:
2126 Rheem Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588
5870 Stoneridge Mall
Rd. Suite 200
Pleasanton, CA 94588
5776 Stoneridge Mall
Rd. Suite 150
Pleasanton, CA 94588
3180 Crow Canyon
Place Suite 216
San Ramon, CA 94583
PHONE: 925-462-5959 925-264-9559 844-674-5179 925-866-2633 CONTACT: Craig Tole Abigail Obligacion Jenna Harris Todd Bailey TERMS: 1 year 1 year 1 year 1 year
RFP SUBMITTED: Yes Yes Yes Yes
SELECTED: Yes Yes No No

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
$105.00 $90.00 $95.00 $95.00
$115.00 $100.00 $115.00 $115.00
$120.00 $120.00 $125.00 $120.00
$160.00 $155.00 $140.00 $140.00
$145.00 $135.00 $140.00 $130.00
$150.00 Varies $175.00 $150.00
TOTAL W/O CASp: $645.00 $600.00 $615.00 $600.00
TABULATION OF BIDS Building Inspection and Plan Review Services Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Plans Examiner
Structural Plan Reviewer
Senior Building Inspector
Non-Structural Plans Examiner
Building Inspector I

DESCRIPTION
Building Inspector II
Entering into an Over 50's agreement with 2
companies, 4LEAF, Inc. and Independent Code
Consultants, Inc. (ICCI)
Agreement to enter contract with both companies
was determined based on full scope of services
offered, good standing established relationship with
the City of Brentwood and flexibility. Neighborhood
Services - Building Division requires the consulting
services to be available on a short notice with
seasoned staff that maintain City of Brentwood
standards.

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

REASON:

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 5 Gallons White Striping Paint $21.95 $21.97
2 5 Gallons Yellow Striping Paint $21.95 $21.97
3 5 Gallons Red Striping Paint $24.95 $24.97
4 5 Gallons Green Striping Paint $24.95 $24.97
5 5 Gallons Blue Striping Paint $24.95 $24.97
6 5 Gallons Stencil Coat $115.00 $115.00
7 5 Gallons Concrete Gray Paint
TOTAL: $233.75 $233.85

TABULATION OF BIDS
Interstate Sales, Inc.

Interstate Sales was the low bid.

Britany Melissa Villar Joseline
408 859-8998
3/4/2025
530-823-6070 530 823-6070
Interstate Sales, Inc. T-Man Traffic Supply Statewide
932 Fesler St.

El Cajon, CA 92020
Striping / Curb Paint
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] No Bid
130 Grobric Ct.

Fairfield, CA 94534
3/4/2025
12600 Locksley Ln. Ste 200
Auburn, CA 95602
No Bid

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Thermoplastic
RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 40 BAGS THERMOPLASTIC WHITE ALKYD 50 LB BAG $1.02 $1.05 2 40 BAGS THERMOPLASTIC YELLOW ALKYD 50 LB BAG $1.00 $1.03 3 40 BAGS GLASS BEADS 50 LB BAG $0.57 $0.60
TOTAL: $2.59 $2.68 No Bid

TABULATION OF BIDS
Interstate Sales, Inc.

Interstate Sales was lowest, responsible bidder.

Britany Melissa Joseline
408 859-8998
3/15/2024
530-823-6070 858 576-1412
Interstate Sales, Inc. T-Man Traffic Supply Safeway Sign 932 Fesler St.

El Cajon, CA 92020
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 130 Grobric Ct.

Fairfield, CA 94533
3/4/2025 3/4/2025
12600 Locksley Ln #200
Auburn, CA 95602

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 $174.20 $202.13 $262.13 $224.00 $249.55
2 1 $685.48 $767.11 $768.06 $754.38 $757.74
3 1 $275.78 $281.62 $284.78 $303.42 $293.70
4 1 $165.89 $173.12 $169.75 $182.48 $175.87
5 1 $138.42 $142.81 $151.95 $144.90 $185.34
6 1 $1,141.59 $1,302.14 $1,313.40 $1,260.10 $1,311.64
7 1 $239.73 $247.51 $289.96 $270.00 $170.33
8 1 $38.14 $38.00 $46.67 $40.67 $47.22
9 1 $94.95 $108.77 $109.06 $121.00 $109.97
10 1 $394.35 $406.61 $486.68 $428.24 $449.30
11 1 $439.25 $473.20 $474.05 $510.00 $480.95
12 1 $4,699.84 $4,957.02 $5,162.84 $5,221.00 $5,213.47
$19.00 $14.00 $19.00 $19.00 $0.00
$331.43 $0.00 $381.19 $827.77 $826.44
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49.99
TOTAL: $8,838.05 $9,114.04 $9,919.52 $10,306.96 $10,321.51 Apple 10.9-inch iPad WiFi 10th gen - 256 GB
EcoStruxure IT Expert Access - 1 year - 100 node
eWaste
Shipping
Tax

DESCRIPTION
Cisco IP Phone 7841 - Desk phone
Lenovo ThinkCentre M70q Gen5 - PC
Lenovo ThinkCentre Tiny-in-One 24 Gen5 - 24" Monitor
DYMO LabelWriter 550
HP LaserJet Pro 3301fdw - Printer
Lenovo ThinkVision T24 - 24" Monitor for Dual Monitor
CyberPower Intelligent LCD - Desktop UPS
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen3 - Laptop
Jabra Engage 65 Mono - Headset
Jabra LINK - hook switch
Damon Tobacco
[email protected]
Ethan Mcleod
[email protected]
954.225.8092
Keith Nguyen
[email protected]
312.705.0246 ext 50246 732.317.3688
Tommy Baxter
[email protected]
925.412.3640
Christian Grejsen
[email protected]
Knight Technology Group

TABULATION OF BIDS
404.689.5568
2/25/2025
Multi-Award Procurement - The nature of purchasing
Technology Goods and Software will require us to
purchase from not only the lowest bidder but also from
the one who can provide the needed goods. Often
vendors are out of stock. To prevent delays in
purchasing, we must utilize mulitple vendors.

REASON:
2/25/2025 2/25/2025
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Technology Goods and Software
2300 NW 55th Court, Suite 110
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
2537 Cedarcrest Rd, Ste 305 #48
Acworth, GA 30101
290 Davidson Avenue
Somerset, NJ 08873
Knight Technology Group Strictly Technology LLC CDW Government, LLC SHI International Corp 200 N. Milwaukee Avenue
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
3/7/2025
GHA Technologies Inc
8998 E Raintree Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
2/25/2025

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

QUOTE NO.:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
1 8 $ 199.99 $ 1,599.92 $ - $ - $ 403.00 $ 2,256.80
2 8 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 51.00 $ 285.60
3 7 $ 292.05 $ 2,044.35 $ - $ - $ 485.00 $ 2,376.50
4 7 $ 18.88 $ 132.16 $ - $ - $ 31.00 $ 151.90
5 7 $ 18.88 $ 132.16 $ - $ - $ 31.00 $ 151.90
6 7 $ 3,750.00 $ 26,250.00 $ - $ - $ 2,745.00 $ 13,450.50 7 7 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 115.00 $ 563.50
8 14 $ 104.99 $ 1,469.86 $ - $ - $ 195.00 $ 1,911.00
9 6 $ 104.99 $ 629.94 $ - $ - $ 195.00 $ 819.00
10 7 $ 1,199.00 $ 8,393.00 $ - $ - $ 1,371.00 $ 6,717.90 11 7 $ 83.95 $ 587.65 $ - $ - $ 141.00 $ 690.90
12 7 $ 83.95 $ 587.65 $ - $ - $ 141.00 $ 690.90
13 2 $ 83.95 $ 167.90 $ - $ - $ 141.00 $ 197.40
14 8 $ 1,109.00 $ 8,872.00 $ - $ - $ 1,383.00 $ 7,744.80 15 7 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 62.00 $ 303.80
16 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 62.00 $ 43.40
17 8 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 463.00 $ 2,592.80
18 8 $ 218.89 $ 1,751.12 $ - $ - $ 363.00 $ 2,032.80
19 8 $ 172.28 $ 1,378.24 $ - $ - $ 286.00 $ 1,601.60
20 2 $ 117.00 $ 234.00 $ - $ - $ 201.00 $ 281.40
21 2 $ 117.00 $ 234.00 $ - $ - $ 201.00 $ 281.40
22 14 $ 117.00 $ 1,638.00 $ - $ - $ 201.00 $ 1,969.80
23 4 $ 117.00 $ 468.00 $ - $ - $ 201.00 $ 562.80
24 15 $ 152.22 $ 2,283.30 $ - $ - $ 252.00 $ 2,646.00
25 1 $ 556.96 $ 556.96 $ - $ - $ 925.00 $ 647.50
26 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 348.00 $ 243.60
27 2 $ 538.08 $ 1,076.16 $ - $ - $ 894.00 $ 1,251.60
28 1 $ 207.68 $ 207.68 $ - $ - $ 345.00 $ 241.50
29 1 $ 68.44 $ 68.44 $ - $ - $ 113.00 $ 79.10
30 1 $ 68.44 $ 68.44 $ - $ - $ 113.00 $ 79.10
31 2 $ 922.76 $ 1,845.52 $ - $ - $ 1,150.00 $ 1,610.00
32 2 $ 30.09 $ 60.18 $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 70.00
33 1 $ 1,199.00 $ 1,199.00 $ - $ - $ 1,355.00 $ 948.50
34 1 $ 2,335.00 $ 2,335.00 $ - $ - $ 2,745.00 $ 1,921.50 35 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 112.00 $ 78.40
36 7 $ 1,097.60 $ 7,683.20 $ - $ - $ 1,537.00 $ 7,531.30 37 7 $ 154.00 $ 1,078.00 $ - $ - $ 220.00 $ 1,078.00
Whelen, 54"LIBERTY II DUO WCX, Center Section
Whelen, Adj Lightbar Mount Kit #94
Gamber-Johnson, 2020+ PIU Console Kit, Short, W Mongoose Xle 9, Cup, Arm Gamber-Johnson, Low Profile Quick Release Keyboard Tray LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba
LEHR/LEHR Auto (via Assumption
Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba
LEHR Auto Electric, Inc.)
Mike McGee
Whelen Vertex Super-LED Omni Directional Lighthead Amber Whelen Speaker Bracket Universal
Whelen ION Mirror-Beam Housing- Pair Utility 20+
Whelen, Mirror-Beam ION Duo - Blue/White
Whelen Mirror-Beam ION Duo- Red/White
Whelen, Liberty II WCX Lightbar 54"
Whelen Lightbar Strap Kit 20-23 Utility
Whelen ION T-Series DUO Red/Blue
Whelen ION T-Series DUO Amber/White
2020-2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility, TRIO™, Upper Rear Housing for Eight Lamp Whelen Vertex Super-LED Omni Directional Lighthead Red
Whelen Vertex Super-LED Omni Directional Lighthead Blue Whelen, Duo Linear ION - Red/White - Black Housing
Whelen, Duo Linear ION - Blue/White - Black Housing
Priority 1 Derotic
661 Garcia Ave Pittsburg, CA 94565 425 Harbor Blvd #6 Belont CA 94002
3145 Gold Valley Dr Ste 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
TABULATION OF BIDS RFQ 25001 - Outtfitting Products for Police Vehicles LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba LEHR/LEHR Auto (via
Assumption Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba LEHR
Auto Electric, Inc.)
Lowest Bidder
Marc Farber Kao Saephanah
[email protected] [email protected]
Whelen Siren Speaker 100W
4/24/2025 No Bid 4/16/2025
53323 5916
925-303-9513 650-654-990

DESCRIPTION
916-790-0336
[email protected]
Whelen Cencom Core WCX Remote Siren & Control Center
Whelen OBDII Canport Cable Kit Ford W/O OEM Option 61B
Whelen, SCANport KIT FOR C399
Whelen Core WCX 21 Push-Buttons & 4-Position Slide Control Head Whelen Vehicle-To-Vehicle Sync Module
Whelen Core WCX 16 Output Expansion Module
Whelen, Tracer Mounting Kit Interceptor Suv
Whelen, WeCanX Tracer 5-Lamp Housing
2020-2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility, Passenger Side Fender Mount 2020-2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility, Driver Side Fender Mount 2020-2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility, Eight Lamps, TRIO™ Whelen ION Duo Series Linear Red/Blue Blk Housing
Whelen, ION Duo Series Linear ION - Amber/White - Black Housing Whelen 12 Diode Interior Light, 6" Round Surface Mount Split Red/White WECANX Howler
One Pair Howler™ Mounting Bracket for 2020-2025, Ford Police Interceptor Utility ProFocus™, Select from Spot/Flood Combination Light or Floodlight from the Control Head Control Head for Arges®, Bail Bracket

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

QUOTE NO.:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba
LEHR/LEHR Auto (via Assumption
Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba
LEHR Auto Electric, Inc.)
Mike McGee
Priority 1 Derotic
661 Garcia Ave Pittsburg, CA 94565 425 Harbor Blvd #6 Belont CA 94002
3145 Gold Valley Dr Ste 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
TABULATION OF BIDS RFQ 25001 - Outtfitting Products for Police Vehicles LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba LEHR/LEHR Auto (via
Assumption Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba LEHR
Auto Electric, Inc.)
Lowest Bidder
Marc Farber Kao Saephanah
[email protected] [email protected]
4/24/2025 No Bid 4/16/2025
53323 5916
925-303-9513 650-654-990

DESCRIPTION
916-790-0336
[email protected]
38 7 $ 375.90 $ 2,631.30 $ - $ - $ 526.00 $ 2,577.40
39 7 $ 1,186.50 $ 8,305.50 $ - $ - $ 1,646.00 $ 8,065.40 40 7 $ 40.60 $ 284.20 $ - $ - $ 56.00 $ 274.40
41 2 $ 325.50 $ 651.00 $ - $ - $ 465.00 $ 651.00
42 7 $ 827.28 $ 5,790.96 $ - $ - $ 1,149.00 $ 6,434.40
43 1 $ 431.28 $ 431.28 $ - $ - $ 599.00 $ 479.20
44 1 $ 85.68 $ 85.68 $ - $ - $ 119.00 $ 95.20
45 4 $ 805.68 $ 3,222.72 $ - $ - $ 1,119.00 $ 3,580.80
46 1 $ 805.68 $ 805.68 $ - $ - $ 1,019.00 $ 895.20
47 7 $ 733.68 $ 5,135.76 $ - $ - $ 1,019.00 $ 5,706.40
48 7 $ 460.08 $ 3,220.56 $ - $ - $ 639.00 $ 3,578.40
49 6 $ 892.08 $ 5,352.48 $ - $ - $ 1,239.00 $ 5,947.20
50 7 $ 1,943.28 $ 13,602.96 $ - $ - $ 2,809.00 $ 15,730.40 51 7 $ 236.88 $ 1,658.16 $ - $ - $ 329.00 $ 1,842.40
52 1 $ 445.68 $ 445.68 $ - $ - $ 619.00 $ 495.20
53 7 $ 698.60 $ 4,890.20 $ - $ - $ 908.18 $ 5,403.67
54 7 $ 21.95 $ 153.65 $ - $ - $ 75.99 $ 319.16
55 9 $ 3,269.00 $ 29,421.00 $ - $ - $ 4,359.00 $ 33,346.35 56 9 $ 508.09 $ 4,572.79 $ - $ - $ 771.20 $ 5,552.64
57 9 $ 184.21 $ 1,657.89 $ - $ - $ 266.89 $ 1,921.61
58 9 $ 444.59 $ 4,001.31 $ - $ - $ 516.49 $ 3,718.73
59 8 $ 154.00 $ 1,232.00 $ - $ - $ 232.40 $ 1,487.36
60 16 $ 34.95 $ 559.20 $ - $ - $ 36.92 $ 443.04
61 8 $ 235.83 $ 1,886.64 $ - $ - $ 287.00 $ 1,836.80
62 2 $ 480.00 $ 960.00 $ - $ - $ 642.60 $ 1,028.16
63 2 $ 124.46 $ 248.92 $ - $ - $ 191.40 $ 306.24
64 1 $ 602.33 $ 602.33 $ - $ - $ 812.00 $ 649.60
65 1 $ 26.13 $ 26.13 $ - $ - $ 37.00 $ 29.60
66 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65.00 $ 52.00
67 1 $ 60.97 $ 60.97 $ - $ - $ 88.00 $ 70.40
68 1 $ 33.50 $ 33.50 $ - $ - $ 48.00 $ 38.40
69 1 $ 7.37 $ 7.37 $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 8.00
70 1 $ 882.39 $ 882.39 $ - $ - $ 1,278.00 $ 1,022.40
Able 2, Triple Outlet Box
Package – VSX Console with Front Bin, Cup Holder and Fuse Block for 2020-2025 Ford Interceptor Utility Front Bin Option for VSX Consoles for 2020-2025 Ford Interceptor Utility Self-Adjusting Double Cup Holder (Fixed Mount)
Console Accessory Bracket Kit with 2 Lighter Plug Outlets and 1 Blank for Rectangular Accessories for 2021-2025 Ford Interceptor Utility
Equipment Bracket Kit for VSX Consoles Front Tray Fits Motorola Remote Radio XTL-1500, XTL-2500, XTL-5000-05, APX-6500, APX-7500, & APX-8500
Mag Mic Magnetic Mic Kit
BLTX: USB Backlit Keyboard with Center Touchpad
SINCLAIR DISGUSED ANTENNA 150-174 MHz UHF MALE CON
STI-CO, Concealed Internal Antenna, 700MHz, 800MHz

CARPOWER SUPPLY - LIND
Cradlepoint, 5-Yr Renewal Netcloud Mobile Perf Adv Plan R1900 FIPS 8-IN-1 SHKFIN 4X5G MIMO, 2WIFI, BT,GPS
LEHRPIT#1 Panorama Antenna For Motorola APX8500 W/QMA
LEHRPIT#2 Panorama Antenna For Motorola APX6500 W/Duplexer DPX-210-270 Equipment Bracket Kit for VSX Consoles Front Tray Siren Light Control – Whelen Docking Station For Panasonic TOUGHBOOK 33 Tablet with Advanced Port Replication & Dual PassThru Antenna Connections PB450L4 Aluminum Bumper ION
Setina, Light-Ready PB450LR4 Push Bumper 21-25 Ford Truck F150.

Gamber-Johnson, Utility On-Dash Mount with 3" Extension Arm, Fits 20+ Ford Police Interceptor Setina 6VS SPT COATED POLY PARTITION
Setina, EZ Lift Single Drawer System Simplex, 20-24 Interceptor Utility Gamber-Johnson, Offset Adapter Bracket
2015+ Ford F-150 Mesh Window Guards
Setina, Window Barriers VS Steel Horizontal 20 Utility
Cargo Command Module
Patrol Power Harness Front Mt. Utility 2020+ (03-0211)
Setina, Wire Harness 4 Light Crosstube and Side
Setina, #10XL C Coated Poly Partition Tall
#10VS C RP Coated Poly Partition
Setina, Replacement Seat W/Center Pull Belts
Setina #12VS Vinyl Coated Expanded Metal Rear Partition TrimLine™ Panasonic TOUGHBOOK® 33 Tablet Docking Station, Lite Port, No RF

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

QUOTE NO.:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba
LEHR/LEHR Auto (via Assumption
Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba
LEHR Auto Electric, Inc.)
Mike McGee
Priority 1 Derotic
661 Garcia Ave Pittsburg, CA 94565 425 Harbor Blvd #6 Belont CA 94002
3145 Gold Valley Dr Ste 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
TABULATION OF BIDS RFQ 25001 - Outtfitting Products for Police Vehicles LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba LEHR/LEHR Auto (via
Assumption Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba LEHR
Auto Electric, Inc.)
Lowest Bidder
Marc Farber Kao Saephanah
[email protected] [email protected]
4/24/2025 No Bid 4/16/2025
53323 5916
925-303-9513 650-654-990

DESCRIPTION
916-790-0336
[email protected]
71 1 $ 231.00 $ 231.00 $ - $ - $ 320.00 $ 256.00
72 1 $ 370.51 $ 370.51 $ - $ - $ 536.00 $ 428.80
73 1 $ 606.35 $ 606.35 $ - $ - $ 892.00 $ 713.60
74 1 $ 26.13 $ 26.13 $ - $ - $ 37.00 $ 29.60
75 1 $ 54.94 $ 54.94 $ - $ - $ 78.00 $ 62.40
76 1 $ 35.51 $ 35.51 $ - $ - $ 51.00 $ 40.80
77 1 $ 68.34 $ 68.34 $ - $ - $ 99.00 $ 79.20
78 1 $ 13.40 $ 13.40 $ - $ - $ 19.00 $ 15.20
79 1 $ 2,538.00 $ 2,538.00 $ - $ - $ 3,525.00 $ 2,467.50 Subtotal $ 181,796.22 $ - $ 183,784.76
Shipping $ 1,730.00 $ - $ 9,995.00
Tax $ 15,907.17 $ - $ 16,081.17
$ 199,433.39 $ - $ 209,860.93
Troy Prod, 2021-22 Ford F150 Bench Plastic Seat w/ Os Belt System and Cab Window Screen TOTAL:
1-Piece Equipment Mounting Bracket, 4″ Mounting Space, Fits Whelen Arges Remote Spotlight Control Head
Standard Universal Rugged Phone Cradle & Industrial Strength Suction Cup Mount 3″ Accessory Pocket, 2.5″ Deep
USB-C & USB Type A Dual Port Charger
Mic Clip Bracket
5-Year Enhanced Protection Plan for DS-PAN-1204-2
Heavy-Duty Dash Mount for 2025 Ford Interceptor Utility Vehicle Premium Package – Rugged Chiclet Style Keyboard With Mount (Includes Emergency Key)

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 Hourly Rate for stripout $125.00 $165.00 No Bid
2 Hourly Rate for Outfitting $125.00 $165.00
3 Transportation of Vehicle Round Trip Flate Rate $250.00 $170.00 TOTAL: $500.00 $500.00 No Bid
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
425 Harbor Blvd. Suite 6 Belmont,
CA 94002
5/17/2024 No Bid
661 Garcia Ave., Pittsburg, CA
94565
Vendors sometimes get backlogged and can go for
extended periods of time to get vehicles ready for
service. We recommend awarding both vendors in case
one is unable to provide service in the time frame
needed for Public Safety. We will prioritize LEHR based on the lower hourly labor rate which will be the majority of the cost. Wattco will not exceed $50k therefore, is not included on Exhibit A.

TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Vehicle Installation Multiple Awards
Mike McGee Tye Whidby Marc and David Farber
209-879-4733
5/15/2024
925-303-9513 707-435-9233
LEHR Upfitter OpCo, LLC dba
LEHR/LEHR Auto (via Assumption
Agreement with Stommel, Inc. dba
LEHR Auto Electric, Inc.) Wattco Equipment Inc. Priority 1 Public Safety Equipment 2230 Cordelia Rd. Fairfield, CA
94534

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 1 1 $500.00 $525.00 $555.00 $582.75 $575.00 $600.00 No response No response 2 1 $590.00 $615.00 $610.00 $640.50 $700.00 $725.00 No response No response 3 1 $590.00 $615.00 $610.00 $640.50 $700.00 $725.00 No response No response 4 1 $890.00 $915.00 $1,025.00 $1,076.25 $925.00 $950.00 No response No response 5 1 $590.00 $615.00 $610.00 $640.50 $715.00 $750.00 No response No response 6 1 $500.00 $525.00 $555.00 $582.75 $575.00 $600.00 No response No response TOTAL: $3,660.00 $3,810.00 $3,965.00 $4,163.25 $4,190.00 $4,350.00 No Response No Response Additional charges:

Haul Biosolids to WM Altamont Landfill
10840 Altamont Pass Road, Livermore, CA 94550
Biosolids Hauling
Haul Biosolids to Lytek
1014 Chadbourne Road, Fairfield, CA 94534
Haul Biosolids to Synagro - Merced Land App and Compost Highway 152 and Harmon Road, El Nido, CA 93620
Haul Biosolids to Synagro - Solano Land Application
3845 Bithell Lane, Suisun City, CA 94585
Haul Biosolids to Potrero Hills Landfill
3675 Potrero Hills Ln., Suisun City, CA 94585
Haul Biosolids to Republic Services - Vasco Road Landfill 4001 North Vasco Road, Livermroe, CA 94551
TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

Lone Tree Trucking, Inc.

Lowest responsible bidder.

03.07.25 510-701-5616
Kent Botti
[email protected]
Michael Sanchez James Dunbar
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Ron Hein, Jr.

03.07.25 510-383-3556

03.07.25 No Respone
510-541-7000 707-419-0084
477 Roland Way
Oakland, CA 94621
P.O. Box 321
Byron, CA 94514
Lone Tree Trucking, Inc. S&S Trucking Lystek International, Inc. 1014 Chadbourne Road
Fairfield, CA 94534
R&D Hein Trucking, LLC
6237 Ricky Road
Copperopolis, CA 95228
Trailer rental, per trailer,
per month, $1,000
Bridge tolls included, if
tolls raise, rate raises
$100 standby per hour
Fuel surcharge to be
based on EIA.gov chart
Rejected loads at disposal
site are subject to
additional fees.

Trailer rental, per trailer,
per month, $1,000
$95 standby per hour
Add 10% for weekend/
holiday hauling
Trailer rental, per trailer,
per month, $1,250
Bridge toll $28 per load, if
tolls raise, rate raises
$100 standby per hour
Fuel surcharge to be
based on EIA.gov chart

TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND:

McCauley Agriculture & Pest Service,
Inc. VENDOR
REASON: Lowest responsible bid.

ADDRESS

QUOTE DATE
PHONE

CONTACT
TERMS
ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 2025/2026:

Total Cost per Service for All Locations on Bid Request $14,688.00 $23,324.56 1 2026/2027:

Total Cost per Service for All Locations on Bid Request $14,688.00 $24,023.84 3/2/2023
925-634-1255
Glen McCauley
[email protected]
Gary Nicolson
7039 Commerce Cir Suite B.

Pleasanton, CA 94566
[email protected]
Jeroen Wright
925-246-3978
30 North Greenville Rd.

Livermore, CA 94551
800-891-7710
No Bid
Herbicide
No bid
McCauley Agriculture BrightView Landscape Cagwin & Dorward 2150 Elkins Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
New Image Landscape Co.
3250 Darby Common
Fremont, CA 94539
3/22/2022
510-226-9191
Russell Takehara
[email protected]
No Bid No Bid
No Bid No Bid
[email protected]

TABULATION OF BIDS
RECOMMEND:

McCauley Agriculture & Pest
Service, Inc. VENDOR:

REASON: Lowest responsible bid
ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 Cost Per Acre Related to Number of Services
New Image Landscape Co.
3250 Darby Common
Fremont, CA 94539
3/22/2022
510-226-9191
Russell Takehara
McCauley Agriculture Cagwin & Dorward
3/22/2022
925-634-1255
Glen McCauley
[email protected]
BrightView Landscape
2150 Elkins Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
7039 Commerce Cir Suite B.

Pleasanton, CA 94566
30 North Greenville Rd.

Livermore, CA 94551
No Bid
$57,520 / $115,040 No Bid
[email protected]
error in adding costs
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Citywide Weed Abatement - Rough Mow & Hand Work per phone call with Justin
No Bid
[email protected]
Gary Nicolson
[email protected]
Jeroen Wright
925-246-3978 800-891-7710
Withdrew Bid Due to Pricing Mistake
3/22/2022

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION Straight Time Overtime UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 General Shop Labor $115.00 $172.50
2 1 Shop Services Machining and Balancing $125.00 $187.50 3 1 Field Superintendent / Foreman $195.00 $292.50
4 1 Field Balancing and Laser Alignment $180.00 $270.00 5 1 Crane plus Operator $245.00 $367.50
6 1 Health & Safety Coordinator $125.00 $187.50
7 1 Confined Space Team Member $135.00 $202.50
8 1 Millwright $185.00 $277.50
9 1 Certified Welder $115.00 $172.50
10 1 Code Welding / Technical Administration $125.00 $187.50 11 1 Field Engineering Services $195.00 $292.50
Service Truck $100/day
Travel $85.00/hr
Per Diem $75.00/day
Martials Markup 20%
TOTAL: $2,610.00
No Bid No Bid
No Bid No Bid
TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Mechanical Services Mechanical Analysis/Repair Inc dba "MarTech"
Lowest Responsible Bid
Dave Ruddock Rick Lemos Katie C.
650-561-8810
3/27/2024
209-333-8478 707-745-9970
Mechanical Analysis/Repair Inc dba
"MarTech" Unico Pan Pacific Mechanical
1209 Polk Street
Benicia, CA 94510
[email protected] rlemos@unicomechanical [email protected] 48363 Fremont Blvd
Fremont, CA 94538
n/a n/a
142 N. Cuff Ave.

Lodi, CA 95240

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Water Distribution and Wastewater parts RECOMMEND:

VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 $162.00 $162.00 $180.00 $180.00 $187.00 $187.00
2 1 $638.00 $638.00 $639.00 $639.00 $645.00 $645.00
3 1 $1,648.20 $1,648.20 $1,685.00 $1,685.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00 4 1 $45.10 $45.10 $45.00 $45.00 $45.75 $45.75
5 1 $25.10 $25.10 $25.25 $25.25 $26.00 $26.00
6 1 $46.50 $46.50 $46.25 $46.25 $47.25 $47.25
7 1 $88.15 $88.15 $88.25 $88.25 $89.00 $89.00
8 1 $41.00 $41.00 $22.00 $22.00 $43.00 $43.00
9 20 Ft. $42.00 $42.00 $45.00 $45.00 $43.00 $43.00
10 1 $61.77 $61.77 $66.00 $66.00 $61.75 $61.75
11 1 $11.99 $11.99 $12.75 $12.75 $12.00 $12.00
12 1 $11.38 $11.38 $12.10 $12.10 $11.50 $11.50
13 1 4" SDR, female x screw cap (clean out adapter) $9.96 $9.96 $6.10 $6.10 $10.25 $10.25 14 1 $11.97 $11.97 $12.75 $12.75 $12.00 $12.00
15 1 $322.14 $322.14 $325.00 $325.00 $346.00 $346.00
TOTAL: $3,165.26 $3,210.45 $3,229.50
4" SDR, 45 Bell x Bell
4" SDR, 22.5 Bell x spigot
4" SDR, 22.5 Bell x Bell
2" Ford Blow off valve Part # BLA18-777-TA-NL
B-16 Concrete Meter Box
B-16 Fibrelyte solid lid marked Water
F8 Concrete Box with F-8D Lid marked Sewer
4" SDR 35 Pipe
4" Maxadapter shielded sewer coupling
8" x 2" CC Bronze Double Strap Service Saddle, 8.99-9.67 4" Flange Gate Valve Iron Body Epoxy Coated with SS bolts Fire Hydrant break off-check valve, per COB Standard W-3 G5 Valve Box
G5 cast iron lid marked Water
Core & Main, LP
2025 East Leland Rd. Pittsburg, CA
94565
The bid is being awarded to Pace Supply Corporation,
Underground Republic Waterworks and Core & Main LP
due to the nature of purchasing parts. Often parts are
needed on an emergency basis and to prevent delays,
other vendors must be utilized. Staff will start with the lowest bidder to ensure best pricing. Underground
Republic Waterworks will not exceed $50k therefore, are not on Exhibit A.

REASON:

TABULATION OF BIDS
Multi-Award Procurement - may utilize one or all
vendors.

Steven Wright Joe Aliotti
3/18/2025
916-343-9437 925-655-7416
Pace Supply Corp. Underground Republic Waterworks
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1315 Main St.

Oakley,CA 94561
3/18/2025 3/18/2025
4015 Newton Rd
Stockton,CA95205
Christian Young
925-679-8005

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION 2024/25 2025/26 2024/25 2025/26 2024/25 2025/26 1 Hourly Rate- at your facility $180.00 $190.00
1 Hourly Rate- Service Truck/our facility or site of breakdown $195.00 $205.00 1 After Hours/Emergency call out rate $210.00 $225.00
List regular hours of operation:

Example: Monday through Friday 7:00AM to 4:30PM
Estimated response time to Brentwood 10 Minutes 10 Minutes Misc fees- List them
Fuel charges $2.00 $2.25
Please include any additional charges that may be billed:

TOTAL: $585.00 $622.25
Phil's Diesel Shane and Dave's Truck Stop Red Tag Repair 3550 S. Highway 99
Stockton, CA 95215
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 437 W Scotts Ave
Stockton, CA 95203

NO RESPONSE NO RESPONSE
11980 Byron Highway
Brentwood, CA 94513
No Bid No Bid
No Bid No Bid
TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Diesel Engine and Heavy Duty Truck Repair Phil's Diesel Clinic, Inc.

Lowest responsible bid
Shane Phillip Cannady [email protected]
844.573.3824

03.15.2024
925.634.4661 209.547.0443

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Generator Maintenance Services
RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION Rates 2024/25 Rates 2025/26 Rates 2024/25 Rates 2025/26 Rates 2024/25 Rates 2025/26 1 57 Quarterly Inspections $22,407.75 $22,407.75 $31,530.00 $31,530.00 2 19 Annual Inspection $35,100.00 $35,100.00 $27,570.00 $27,570.00 3 19 2 hour load bank tests $18,633.00 $18,633.00 $26,955.00 $26,955.00 TOTAL $76,140.75 $76,140.75 $86,055.00 $86,055.00
Hourly Rate: $190.00 $190.00 $195.00 $195.00
After hours rate: $285.00 $285.00 $273.00 $273.00
Holiday rate: $300.00 $300.00 $350.00 $350.00
Response Time: 2 hours 2 hours 2-4 hours 2-4 hours
Trip Charge: $2.95 per mile $2.95 per mile
$3.00 per mile +
hourly rate portal
to portal
$3.00 per mile +
hourly rate portal
to portal
TOTAL: $76,915.75 $76,915.75 $86,873.00 $86,873.00 No Bid The nature of generator maintenance and repairs will
require the City to utilize not only the lowest bidder but also the vendor who can provide services on an
emergency basis. This will allow flexability should there be availability and/or time constraint issues. Staff will use the lowest priced vendor for routine maintenance.

Staff do not anticipate spending over $50k with
California Diesel & Power therefore, it is not listed on Exhibit A.

No Bid

TABULATION OF BIDS
Multi-Award Procurement - may utilize one or both of
the following vendors: PowerGen, Inc and California
Diesel & Power
Victor Poley Mike Sartorio
3/15/2024
209-229-1990 925-229-2700
PowerGen, Inc. California Diesel & Power Dynamic Generator Service 150 Nardi Ln
Martinez, CA 94553
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3/12/2024
793 S. Tracy Blvd. #307
Tracy CA 95376

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL T-Shirt
Carhartt K87 EA EA $14.29 EA $22.00 EA $17.99 EA $16.99 $17.86 No Bid No Bid $21.24
$17.86 $25.25 $22.49 $21.24
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
T-Shirt Long
carhartt K126 EA EA $19.64 EA $25.75 EA $22.99 EA $21.24 $23.21 $28.50 No Bid $25.49
$23.21 No Bid $27.99 $25.49
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
Polo Short Sleeve
K500 EA EA $12.84 EA $16.99 EA $16.19 EA $15.29
$14.27 $17.99 $17.99 $16.99
$17.13 $19.99 $21.59 $20.39
$18.56 $20.99 $23.39 $20.39
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
Polo (s/s tall)
TLK500 EA EA $14.27 EA $17.99 EA $17.99 EA $16.99
$15.70 $18.99 $19.79 $18.69
$17.13 $19.99 $21.59 $20.39
$18.56 $20.99 $23.39 $22.09
$19.99 $21.99 $25.19 $23.79
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
The nature of purchasing apparel and providing safety
footwear for employees will require purchasing from not only the lowest bidder but also one that can provide the needed goods and services within a specified
timeframe. Often vendors are out of stock or do not
have the specific brands Employee's utilize, thus
requiring to utilize multiple vendors. It is anticipated that the spending with the other vendors will be under $50k
therefore, they are not on Exhibit A.

REASON:
3XLT
LT
Screenprinting
4XL
3XL
2XLT
XLT
2XL
S-XL
Screenprinting
LT-4XLT
3XL-4XL
Work Wear and Screen Printing Services
S-2XL
Screenprinting
LT-4XLT
3XL-4XL
S-2XL
TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

Multi-Award Procurement, may utilize one or all vendors 3/24/2025
310-612-4147
Ben Taylor
[email protected]
Jeff Monser Luis Aceves
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Clinton Killgrove
3/20/2025
925-759-1389
3/23/2025 3/24/2025
949-372-5192 408-314-2474
561 1st Street
Brentwood, CA 94513
1530 Neroly Rd.

Oakley, CA 94561
Purpose-Built Trade Co. Revolve Ink Work World
240 St. Paul St, STE 200C
Denver, CO 80206
Boot Barn
15345 Barranca Parkway
Irvine, CA 92618
4XLT
Screenprinting

Polo Long Sleeve
K500LS EA EA $17.84 EA $20.49 EA $22.49 EA $21.24
$19.27 $21.49 $24.29 $22.94
$22.13 $23.59 $27.99 $26.34
$23.56 $24.49 $29.69 No Bid
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
Polo (l/s tall)
TLK500LS EA EA $19.27 EA $23.49 EA $24.29 EA $22.94
$20.70 $24.49 $26.09 $24.64
$22.13 $25.49 $27.99 $26.34
$23.56 $27.59 $29.69 $28.04
$24.99 $27.49 $31.49 $29.74
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
Sweatshirt
Carhartt K121 EA EA $37.14 EA $43.75 EA $44.99 EA $42.49 $40.71 $46.75 No Bid $46.74
$40.71 No Bid $49.49 No Bid
$3.52 No Bid No Bid $2.50
Hat
Richardson 112 EA EA $7.85 EA $12.25 EA No Bid EA $8.00 $7.03 No Bid No Bid $2.35
Beanie
CP90L EA EA $4.48 EA $8.69 EA $5.39 EA $8.00
$7.03 No Bid No Bid $2.35

ANSI S/S
LUX-TSSP2BK EA EA $19.40 EA $26.49 EA No Bid EA $12.74
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50

ANSI L/S
LUX-TLSP3BK EA EA $23.58 EA $29.59 EA No Bid EA $17.84
$2.70 No Bid No Bid $2.50
Fee N/A $15.00 N/A $20.00
Discount Pants 12% 20-35% 10% 15%
Discount Boots 12% 5-20% 10% 15%
TOTAL: $671.02 $678.54 $622.45 $691.93
4XL
Screenprinting
LT
Embroidery
XLT
2XLT
3XLT
4XLT
Screenprinting
S-2XL
3XL-4XL
LT-3XLT
Screenprinting
OSFM - Note Substitution
S-XL
2XL
3XL
OSFM
Proposed Discount
Additional Fee's
Proposed Discount
Embroidery
S-4XL
Screenprinting
S-4XL
Screenprinting

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Concrete Materials
RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

QUOTE DATE:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
1 1 YARD $180.00 $165.00
2 $100.00 $165.00
3 $16.00 $10.00
4 $60.00 $10.00
5 $50.00
6 $4.00 $1.50
7 $11.26
8 $4.00 $11.26
Prevailing Wage Surcharge based on 9 Yard Average $150.00 $210.00 Please include any additional charges that may be billed:

Certified Payroll Recording Fee
TOTAL: $564.00 $584.02 No Bid
Retarder Per Ounce
Fiber Mesh
Fuel Surcharge Fee
Environmental Fee
Stand-By Time Per Minute After Allotted Time
Accelerator Per Ounce

DESCRIPTION
Locations: various locations within the City limits
2500 PSI Concrete Per City Specifications
Short Load Fee
Raymond Cook
[email protected]
Recommend awarding to the second lowest bidder, RC Readymix Company, Inc., as the lowest bidder is unable to fulfill insurance requirements.

Neils Larsen
[email protected]
3/25/2025
925-449-7785
Robert Costa
[email protected]
3/21/2025
RC Readymix Company, Inc.

TABULATION OF BIDS
925-432-3828 707-309-4379
1227 Greenville Rd.

Livermore, CA 94550
2170 Elkins Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
5640 La Rivera St. Unit B
Livermore, CA 94550
Antioch Building Materials Co. RC Readymix Company, Inc. Central Concrete

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
1 1 No Response No Response No Response
2 1 No Response No Response No Response
3 1 No Response No Response No Response
4 1 No Response No Response No Response
5 1 No Response No Response No Response
6 1 No Response No Response No Response
7 1 No Response No Response No Response
TOTAL: No Response No Response No Response

N/A N/A
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Pump Repair Services
405 Allan Street
Daly City, CA 94014
3825 Hopyard Road, Ste 195
Pleasanton, CA 94588
527 Whitney Street
San Leandro, CA 94577
Shape, Inc. Shape, Inc. Pump Repair Service, Co. Koffler Electrical

TABULATION OF BIDS
(925) 485-9720
N/A
No response from bidders. Director approval granted to select vendor of choice.

REASON:

Charlie Koffler
[email protected]
Nick Chavez
[email protected]
(415) 467-2150
Wayne Archer
[email protected]
(510) 567-0690
Supply and replace the shaft sleeve and seal for a Fairbanks Morse pump #8- C5425. Serial # of pump is: 234792-0. All materials to be used will be OEM parts. Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

Supply and replace the shaft sleeve and seal for a Fairbanks Morse pump #8- 5721. Serial # of pump is: 234953-0. All materials to be used will be OEM parts.

Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

Resurface rotor, supply and replace stator for Moyno pump #2E012GI CDX-X DAX. All materials to be used will be OEM parts. Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

Supply rotary lobes and wear plates for NETZSCH Nemo Pump #T206/300 BD-E.

All materials to be used will be OEM parts. Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

DESCRIPTION
Overhaul Flygt pump NP3300, 75 HP, including a new type N impeller with tungsten carbide coating, new insert ring, bearings, seals, o-ring kit, and labor.

Impeller is hard iron. All materials to be used will be OEM parts. Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

Overhaul Flygt pump CP3201, 30 HP, including a new type N impeller, new wear ring, bearings, seals, o-ring kit, and labor. Impeller is cast iron. All materials to be used will be OEM parts. Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

Overhaul Flygt pump NP3152, 20 HP, including a new type N impeller, new wear ring, bearings, seals, o-ring kit, and labor. Impeller is hard iron. All materials to be used will be OEM parts. Any shop fabrication or modification to pump is subject to manufacturer approval.

Please include any additional charges that may be billed:

TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT NAME:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 TON $43.75 $43.75 $47.82 $47.82
TOTAL: $43.75 $47.82
The nature of purchasing base rock used for various
repairs requires Public Works to purchase from not
only the lowest bidder but the one that can provide the needed goods. Quotes received from D. Foskett
Trucking and Shaver Trucking were similar overall.

REASON:

Multi-Award - may utilize one or both of the following
vendors: D. Foskett Trucking and Shaver Trucking
and Excavating, Inc.

No Bid
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3/4 inch Virgin Class II Base Rock - Delivered
3/13/2025
Joe Shaver Niels Larsen
3/7/2025
Rachelle Whitten
No Bid
Base Rock
Antioch Building Materials Co.
2170 Elkins Way Brentwood, CA
94513
No Bid
925-687-2976 925-446-9346 925-432-0171
D. Foskett Trucking, Inc. Shaver Trucking and Excavating Inc.

PO Box 920 Clayton, CA 94517
2401 Adams Lane Brentwood, CA
94513

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 $174.20 $202.13 $262.13 $224.00 $249.55
2 1 $685.48 $767.11 $768.06 $754.38 $757.74
3 1 $275.78 $281.62 $284.78 $303.42 $293.70
4 1 $165.89 $173.12 $169.75 $182.48 $175.87
5 1 $138.42 $142.81 $151.95 $144.90 $185.34
6 1 $1,141.59 $1,302.14 $1,313.40 $1,260.10 $1,311.64
7 1 $239.73 $247.51 $289.96 $270.00 $170.33
8 1 $38.14 $38.00 $46.67 $40.67 $47.22
9 1 $94.95 $108.77 $109.06 $121.00 $109.97
10 1 $394.35 $406.61 $486.68 $428.24 $449.30
11 1 $439.25 $473.20 $474.05 $510.00 $480.95
12 1 $4,699.84 $4,957.02 $5,162.84 $5,221.00 $5,213.47
$19.00 $14.00 $19.00 $19.00 $0.00
$331.43 $0.00 $381.19 $827.77 $826.44
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49.99
TOTAL: $8,838.05 $9,114.04 $9,919.52 $10,306.96 $10,321.51 2/25/2025 2/25/2025
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Technology Goods and Software
2300 NW 55th Court, Suite 110
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
2537 Cedarcrest Rd, Ste 305 #48
Acworth, GA 30101
290 Davidson Avenue
Somerset, NJ 08873
Knight Technology Group Strictly Technology LLC CDW Government, LLC SHI International Corp. 200 N. Milwaukee Avenue
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
3/7/2025
GHA Technologies Inc.
8998 E Raintree Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
2/25/2025
SHI International Corp.

TABULATION OF BIDS
404.689.5568
2/25/2025
Multi-Award Procurement - The nature of purchasing
Technology Goods and Software will require us to
purchase from not only the lowest bidder but also
from the one who can provide the needed goods.

Often vendors are out of stock. To prevent delays in
purchasing, we must utilize mulitple vendors.

REASON:

Damon Tobacco
[email protected]
Ethan Mcleod
[email protected]
954.225.8092
Keith Nguyen
[email protected]
312.705.0246 ext 50246 732.317.3688
Tommy Baxter
[email protected]
925.412.3640
Christian Grejsen
[email protected]
HP LaserJet Pro 3301fdw - Printer
Lenovo ThinkVision T24 - 24" Monitor for Dual Monitor
CyberPower Intelligent LCD - Desktop UPS
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen3 - Laptop
Jabra Engage 65 Mono - Headset
Jabra LINK - hook switch

DESCRIPTION
Cisco IP Phone 7841 - Desk phone
Lenovo ThinkCentre M70q Gen5 - PC
Lenovo ThinkCentre Tiny-in-One 24 Gen5 - 24" Monitor
DYMO LabelWriter 550
Apple 10.9-inch iPad WiFi 10th gen - 256 GB
EcoStruxure IT Expert Access - 1 year - 100 node
eWaste
Shipping
Tax

TABULATION OF BIDS
RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 2025/2026
$1,200.00
Relocation Fee $500.00
2 $1,225.00
Relocation Fee $500.00
$1,200.00
$500.00
Rocky Point Farm Living Systems
Cost Per Acre
TOTAL COST PER RELOCATION: No Bid No Bid No Bid
Star Creek Land Stewards Inc.

Lowest responsible bid. 36034 Highway 33
Coalings, CA 93210
City Grazing
100 Cargo Way
San Francisco, CA 94124
No Bid No Bid No Bid
1611 Hoffman Ln
Byron, CA 94514
Cost Per Acre
[email protected]
TOTAL COST PER ACRE:

Weed Abatement Using Goats
3/10/2025
209-704-1790
Andree Soares
408-507-5700
Mike Canaday
925-306-2093
William Adkins
[email protected]
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

Star Creek Land Stewards, Inc.
1232 California Ave
Los Banos, CA 93635
2026/2027
No Bid
[email protected] [email protected]
415-642-7172
No Bid No Bid

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 1 $174.20 $202.13 $262.13 $224.00 $249.55
2 1 $685.48 $767.11 $768.06 $754.38 $757.74
3 1 $275.78 $281.62 $284.78 $303.42 $293.70
4 1 $165.89 $173.12 $169.75 $182.48 $175.87
5 1 $138.42 $142.81 $151.95 $144.90 $185.34
6 1 $1,141.59 $1,302.14 $1,313.40 $1,260.10 $1,311.64
7 1 $239.73 $247.51 $289.96 $270.00 $170.33
8 1 $38.14 $38.00 $46.67 $40.67 $47.22
9 1 $94.95 $108.77 $109.06 $121.00 $109.97
10 1 $394.35 $406.61 $486.68 $428.24 $449.30
11 1 $439.25 $473.20 $474.05 $510.00 $480.95
12 1 $4,699.84 $4,957.02 $5,162.84 $5,221.00 $5,213.47
$19.00 $14.00 $19.00 $19.00 $0.00
$331.43 $0.00 $381.19 $827.77 $826.44
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49.99
TOTAL: $8,838.05 $9,114.04 $9,919.52 $10,306.96 $10,321.51 2/25/2025 2/25/2025
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Technology Goods and Software
2300 NW 55th Court, Suite
110
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
2537 Cedarcrest Rd, Ste 305
#48
Acworth, GA 30101
290 Davidson Avenue
Somerset, NJ 08873
Knight Technology Group Strictly Technology LLC CDW Government, LLC SHI International Corp 200 N. Milwaukee Avenue
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
3/7/2025
GHA Technologies Inc
8998 E Raintree Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
2/25/2025
Strictly Technology LLC

TABULATION OF BIDS
404.689.5568
2/25/2025
Multi-Award Procurement - The nature of purchasing
Technology Goods and Software will require us to
purchase from not only the lowest bidder but also from
the one who can provide the needed goods. Often
vendors are out of stock. To prevent delays in
purchasing, we must utilize mulitple vendors.

REASON:

Damon Tobacco
[email protected]
Ethan Mcleod
[email protected]
954.225.8092
Keith Nguyen
[email protected]
312.705.0246 ext 50246 732.317.3688
Tommy Baxter
[email protected]
925.412.3640
Christian Grejsen
[email protected]
HP LaserJet Pro 3301fdw - Printer
Lenovo ThinkVision T24 - 24" Monitor for Dual Monitor
CyberPower Intelligent LCD - Desktop UPS
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen3 - Laptop
Jabra Engage 65 Mono - Headset
Jabra LINK - hook switch

DESCRIPTION
Cisco IP Phone 7841 - Desk phone
Lenovo ThinkCentre M70q Gen5 - PC
Lenovo ThinkCentre Tiny-in-One 24 Gen5 - 24" Monitor
DYMO LabelWriter 550
Apple 10.9-inch iPad WiFi 10th gen - 256 GB
EcoStruxure IT Expert Access - 1 year - 100 node
eWaste
Shipping
Tax

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION
1 1 Supply and delivery of Sodium Bisulfite, 25%
2 1 Supply and delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5%
TOTAL:

PRICE PER GALLON PRICE PER GALLON
Any order under 2,000 gallons will have a $475.00 LTL fee added to the invoice. If split loads, the first order will be charged the LTL fee.

Thatcher Company of California, Inc.

PRICE PER GALLON
$1.97 plus tax
Hasa, Inc.

P.O. Box 27407
Salt Lake City, UT 84127-0407
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
23119 Drayton Street
Saugus, CA 91350
3/11/2025 n/a
8201 S 212th Street
Kent, WA 98032
No Bid No Bid
$5.22 plus tax No Bid No bid
$3.25 plus tax unable to meet requirements No Bid
TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Supply and Delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite 12.5% and Sodium Bisulfite 25% Univar Solutions USA, LLC
Univar Solutions USA, LLC was awarded the bid.

Thatcher Company of California, Inc., was unable to
meet chemical requirements; therefore, their bid was not accepted.

Tyler Andersen Christoper Coinish Jennifer M. Perras
661-259-5848
2/16/2024
253-872-5040 916-389-2517
Univar Solutions USA, LLC

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 BFAC $21,944.00 $17,246.11 $33,835.00
2 Library $31,322.00 $30,351.86 $34,556.00
3 Heritage High School Pool Bldg $9,948.56 $10,320.00 $8,700.00 4 City Hall $61,248.00 $71,856.10 $82,440.00
5 Community Center $34,428.00 $25,868.63 $58,900.00
6 Parking Garage $6,864.00 $3,899.17 $17,150.00
7 Police Dept. $36,332.67 $44,892.00 $48,250.00
8 Police Sub-Station $1,839.80 $2,993.00 $5,960.00
9 Public Works (MSC, Solid Waste, Wastewater, Fleet Bldgs.) $38,604.00 $32,191.66 $43,850.00 10 Women's Club $1,839.80 $4,644.00 $6,595.00
11 Senior Center $15,699.64 $18,060.00 $43,450.00
$65,660.47 $80,909.00 $112,955.00
TOTAL: $260,070.47 $262,322.53 $383,686.00
HIGHLIGHTED TOTALS:
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Provide Janitorial Services for Various Buildings and Facilities Universal Building Services and Supply Company, Inc.

Lowest responsible bid for certain facilities (highlighted).

City Hall and the Community Center (Civic Center) were
awarded to same contractor. Award for 2-year contract
(2022/23 - 2023/24) with option to extend an additional two years.

William Martinez Rick Oropeza Donald Jacko Sr.
925-934-5533 415-828-3946 510-568-5951
Universal Building Services and
Supply Company, Inc.

Frank & Grossman Landscape
Contractors, Inc. Dad Services
311 Depot Rd
Hayward CA, 94545
6681 Foothil Blvd
Oakland CA 94605
1717 Solano Way, #29
Concord CA, 94523

TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION
Unit Price
2025/2026
Unit Price
2026/2027 UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
1 Garage sweeping twice a month-every other Friday $342.00 $360.00 cost per service including stairs and corners
1 Pressure washing of stairs-quarterly $535.14 $563.31
cost per service
1 Dusting fixtures and pipes-quarterly $721.00 $758.00
cost per service
1 Complete garage pressure washing $8,335.00 $9,261.00
washing of deck, walls and ceiling
cost per service
TOTAL: $9,933.14 $10,942.31 No Bid No Bid
Universal Site Services, Inc. was the only bidder
Universal Site Services, Inc.

City Parking Structure Cleaning
Universal Site Services, Inc. Klean-Sweep CleanSweep Services, Inc. 760 E Capitol Ave
Milpitas, CA 95035
P.O. Box 3607
Torrance, CA 90510
1105 Kern Ave.

Sunnyvale, CA 94085
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3/38/2025
209-639-7593 310-628-8150 408.912.1512
Luis Rodriguez n/a Eric

RECOMMEND: VENDOR:

REASON:

ADDRESS:

QUOTE DATE:

PHONE:

CONTACT:

EMAIL:

ITEM # QTY DESCRIPTION FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 FY25/26 FY26/27 1 1 $37.49 $39.36 No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid TOTAL: $37.49 $39.36 No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid Republic Services-Vasco
Landfill
4001 North Vasco Rd
Livermore, CA 94553
Lowest responsible bidder.
1014 Chadbourne Rd.

Fairfield, CA 94534
10840 Altamont Pass Rd.

Livermore, CA 94550
Altamont Landfill Lystek International Limited
[email protected]
n/a
650.333.0729
Synagro-WWT, Inc.
435 Williams Ct., Suite 100
Baltimore, MD 21220
WasteCommenctions:

Portero Landfill
PO Box 68
Fairfield, CA 94533
[email protected] [email protected] John Pugliaresi
[email protected]
Biosolids Disposal
Lisa Williams/Eric Lynch
[email protected]
James Dunbar Susan Allala
n/a
707-430-5500
n/a
Joseph Lynch
n/a
209.547.7518 707.432.4627 Ext 54627
Disposal (per ton)
TABULATION OF BIDS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:

Waste Management of Alameda
County, Inc. dba Altamont Landfill
3/11/2025
925-421-5164

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
SUBJECT: 2024/25 and 2025/26 Operating Budget amendments; amending the fund balance commitments in the General Fund; and
approving the 2025/26 Pay Schedule
DEPARTMENT: Finance and Information Systems
STAFF: Kerry Breen, Director of Finance and Information Systems Christine Andrews, Asst. Dir. Of Finance & Information Systems Sonia Agostini, Accounting Manager

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution 1) amending the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 Operating Budgets, 2) amending the FY 2024/25 fund balance commitments in the General Fund and 3) approving the FY 2025/2026 Pay Schedule in accordance with 2 CCR Section 570.5 and authorizing the City Manager or Designee, in consultation with the City Attorney, to make ministerial revisions to it.

FISCAL IMPACT
Included in this report is an update of the two-year General Fund projection. This projection is conservative, reflects current known economic conditions, and includes the proposed FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 General Fund amendments detailed in this report. The two-year projection shows a positive result from ongoing operations, with operational revenues exceeding ongoing and one-time expenses by $2.4 million.

However, the increase in the 30% reserve requirement is likely to require a transfer in from the Budget Stabilization Fund in FY 2025/26.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
General Fund operating revenues are sufficient in the two-year period to cover operating and one-time expenses with no deficit spending from ongoing operations.

However, due to an increase in expenditures, staff projects that a net transfer from the Budget Stabilization Fund to the General Fund of $0.5 million in FY 2025/26 will be needed to increase the Reserve of 30% of expenses required by Budget and Fiscal Policies.

This net transfer would increase if capital project adjustments proposed in the 2025/26 – 2029/30 Capital Improvement Budget (Basketball court lighting, Fleet Electrification and Signal Replacements) are approved on July 22. This $360,000 cost would increase the projected transfer to approximately $810,000.

Proposed FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 Operating Budget amendments are summarized in the Background section. A detailed schedule of budget amendments can be found in Exhibit A and Exhibit B and detailed descriptions of each amendment can be found in Exhibit C.

The amendments included in this report are consistent with the City Council’s direction that current revenues cover current operational expenditures and that the General Fund reserve of 30% of operating expenditures is maintained.

Staff will keep the City Council informed of any significant economic impacts to the operating budget and the next scheduled financial update is in January 2026 at the FY 2025/26 Mid-Year Operating Budget presentation.

BACKGROUND
The City Council was scheduled to consider this item at its June 24, 2025 meeting, which was cancelled for lack of a quorum.

The City’s Operating Budget is prepared on a two-year cycle, which currently includes both FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26. Section 2.3 of the Council/Administrative Policy, No. 10-5, Budget and Fiscal Policies (“Policy”) requires that, prior to the commencement of the second year of the two-year budget, the City Council considers changes being recommended for the second year of the two-year budget at a public meeting.

Tonight’s action is the “mid-term” review of the 2025/26 Operating Budget required by this Policy. Staff has completed a thorough review of all of the City’s funds and operations and is recommending the Operating Budget amendments summarized in this report.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
PROJECTED GENERAL FUND FY 2024/25 RESULTS
As FY 2024/25 winds down, staff conservatively estimates an approximate break even General Fund result for the fiscal year. Continued vacancy savings along with one-time revenues have improved the City’s fiscal position from prior projections.

This projection includes continued full funding of the City’s replacement funds and the impacts from maintaining the 30% General Fund reserve requirement. Staff is increasingly optimistic that a modest surplus may ultimately be realized once the books are fully closed due to investment gains and a slowing of expenditures experienced in the second half of the fiscal year. Preliminary year-end results and analysis will be provided to the City Council in October via the annual Financial Snapshot, with the full audited financials scheduled for publication in December. 2025/26 GENERAL FUND PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENTS AND FISCAL

OUTLOOK
Staff combines both fiscal years (e.g. 2024/25 – 2025/26) of a budget period when analyzing and forecasting results in order to smooth out any one-year variations. The updated two-year projection is for a net Budget Stabilization draw of approximately $450,000, comprised of a breakeven result for FY 2024/25 and a projected Budget Stabilization Fund draw of $450,000 in FY 2025/26. The improved financial projection is largely a result of the release of remaining funding in the Parking Garage Security and Safety Enhancements project, which will return over $400,000 to the General Fund. Staff’s projection continues to remain conservative, with improvements possible during the year, if traditional budget savings start to become realized.

Should the City Council approve the $360,000 in capital project increases included in the draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget (Basketball court lighting, Fleet Electrification and Signal Replacements) the conservatively projected Budget Stabilization Fund draw would increase to $810,000, with likely improvements during the year should economic conditions remain similar to the current environment. The CIP Budget is scheduled to come to the City Council for consideration of adoption on July 22, 2025.

The forecast for next fiscal year includes an additional $140,000 in projected General Fund revenues, which includes increases in property tax ($260,000) and development ($370,000) largely offset by decreases in sales tax ($400,000) and other miscellaneous downward adjustments ($70,000). The decline in sales tax revenues is a somewhat concerning economic indicator, which may signal an overall economic slowdown. The increase in development revenue does not reflect an

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
increase in development activity; but rather the increased permitting fees approved by the City Council earlier this year.

On the expenditure side, a total of $1.28 million in expenditure increases are requested for next fiscal year. While $1.28 million in expenditure increases would typically raise concern, the majority of this reflects previously approved items ($470,000) from FY 2024/25 such as parks and recreation staffing and police contractual services; along with re-budgeted one-time costs ($540,000) such as Economic Development, Community Development and Human Resources strategic initiatives. Only $270,000 represents new requests (0.33% of total budget). The full detail of all budget requests (both increases and decreases) are summarized in the attached Exhibit C, with significant line item increases noted below:
 America’s 250th Anniversary celebration ($50,000)
 Animal Services ($100,000)
 Library ($30,000 – see Exhibit C, page C- 2, for benchmarking and other information related to this request)
 Signal Repair Services provided by the County ($150,000) Staff’s current General Fund projections incorporate the proposed FY 2025/26 General Fund amendments included in this report. In summary, staff’s current projections demonstrate that over the two year budget period, the General Fund is able to operate with a very reasonable net draw of $450,000 from the Budget Stabilization Fund. When accounting for the projected increase in the 30% reserve over the two year period (from $22.4 million to $25.5 million), the overall cash position of the General Fund continues to trend in a positive direction.

GENERAL FUND TEN-YEAR FISCAL MODEL PROJECTION
The Fiscal Model assesses the impacts of proposed budget changes and whether those changes affect the City’s goal of a sustainable financial future. The Fiscal Model helps evaluate how current decisions and economic trends may impact long-term fiscal health. It is important to note that the Fiscal Model provides an analysis for a specific point in time and many variables can and do significantly change the forecast.

The Fiscal Model is not a precise prediction of future results; instead, it identifies long-term trends and potential financial challenges. With proper planning and vision, the Fiscal Model allows for course corrections well in advance of potential financial problems becoming a reality.

A summary of the results of the current Fiscal Model forecast is presented in the following graph:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
The Budget Stabilization Fund, shown in green, has a projected 2024/25 year-end balance of $14.3 million. The significant drawdown in 2025/26 is primarily due to a discretionary $1.5 million pension prepayment authorized by the City Council. At the end of the ten-year period, the remaining Budget Stabilization Fund balance is projected to be about $1.3 million. It should be noted that staff’s very long-term projections indicate decreasing cost pressures in the 15-20 year timeframe, which should eliminate the need for the Budget Stabilization Fund at that time.

A few key factors included in the most current version of the Fiscal Model include:
 Increases for completed labor negotiations
 Increases in future CalPERS pension costs resulting from prior CalPERS underperformance, along with the resulting increase in unfunded obligations due to higher salary inflation.
 Estimated personnel savings rate falls to around 6.5% from the current 7.5%.  Operating cost placeholders for the future Sand Creek Sports Complex and Vineyards Amphitheater
 Impacts of absorbing the Affordable Housing costs into the General Fund when the Affordable Housing In-Lieu funds are exhausted (estimated 2030)  Slowing development, with an average of only 68 single family; 135 multifamily permits per year; and after the opening of Costco, modest commercial, office and industrial development
 Higher medium-term investment returns on cash balances due to higher interest rates

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
The Fiscal Model projections can, and will change over time, as new economic conditions emerge and the City Council enacts policy decisions. Staff will continue to update the Fiscal Model for these changes as they occur and report back regularly.

FY 2024/25 FUND BALANCE COMMITMENTS FOR THE GENERAL FUND Recommended changes in the fund balance commitments of the General Fund at year-end June 30, 2025 are summarized in Exhibit B. The commitment for the General Plan Update is being revised to re-spread the necessary set-aside to account for project timing changes as approved by the City Council on June 25, 2024. The increase in the Future Strategic Initiatives commitment is for expenditures budgeted to occur in FY 2024/25 that did not occur and are now expected to be spent in FY 2025/26.

ENTERPRISE FUNDS BUDGET AMENDMENTS
City Enterprise Funds with personnel have proposed net budget decreases as a result of lower Workers Compensation costs attributable to the City’s safety record, which was partially offset by an increase in health insurance premiums. Expenditure decreases are also being proposed to reduce transfers to the Insurance Fund to reflect lower estimated general insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

The additional proposed expenditure budget increase in the Solid Waste Enterprise is to account for the purchase of two new vehicles, primarily to ensure compliance with Senate Bill 1383 organics processing. In addition, the costs associated with the replacement of one frontload truck are estimated to be higher than amount set-aside in the replacement fund.

Detailed amounts and explanations of all budget requests can be found in the attached Exhibits A - C.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025

OTHER FUNDS BUDGET AMENDMENTS
The proposed revenue budget decrease is for the reduction in transfers in from other funds, reflecting lower estimated general insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

A variety of expenditure budget amendments are being proposed in Other Funds, including: 1) personnel cost adjustments for lower Workers Compensation costs attributable to the City’s safety record, offset slightly by an increase in health insurance premiums; 2) reduced transfers to the Insurance Fund to reflect lower estimated general insurance costs; 3) the carryover of unspent 2024/25 budgets for agriculture programs and services and vehicle and facilities replacements; and 4) to increase to replacement budgets for timing changes and new replacement needs.

Detailed amounts and explanations of all budget requests can be found in the attached Exhibits A - C.

FY 2024/25 BUDGET AMENDMENTS
A revenue budget increase in the General Fund in the amount of $98,830 is proposed to account for development impact fee administration reimbursement for parks planning costs. An expenditure increase for the same amount is proposed in the Parks and Trails Development Impact Fee Fund to account for this reimbursement to the General Fund for parks planning costs.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025
An increase in expenditure budget in the Special Revenue Asset Forfeiture Fund of $238 is being proposed to account for allowable costs incurred during investigation operations.

A budget adjustment totaling $51,195 is being proposed to increase expenditure budget in nine (9) Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Funds to account for utilities and other maintenance costs that are higher than anticipated in the original budget.

FY 2025/26 PAY SCHEDULE
In FY 2024/2025, the City reached agreement with all six bargaining groups and the agreements expire June 30, 2027. The MOUs outline the salary adjustments approved during the term of the agreements. In addition, the City approved the Compensation Summary, also expiring June 30, 2027, for Unrepresented Executive and Senior Management Employees. The salary adjustments reflected in the FY 2025/2026 Pay Schedule before you tonight for approval include the salary information for the six bargaining groups and unrepresented executive and senior management employees previously approved by Council in November, December, February, March, April, and June in FY 2024/2025.

California Public Employers’ Retirement System (CalPERS) employers are required by law to make a Council approved Pay Schedule publically available for not less than five years. (2 CCR § 570.5.) Staff recommends Council approve the Pay Schedule (Exhibit D) for FY 2025/2026, and authorize the City Manager or designee, in consultation with the City Attorney, to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule.

FY 2024/25 - FY 2025/26 BRENTWOOD EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION –

MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE DIVISION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BUDGET AMENDMENT
The City Council action on June 10, 2025 to approve the successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Employees’ Association Miscellaneous Office Division included an action to amend the Operating Budget for associated costs.

While the resolution included the total budget amendment, the reference to the budget amendment Exhibit was inadvertently omitted. In the action tonight, staff is requesting that the City Council approve these associated budget amendments by each fund in the attached Exhibit E.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.1
07/01/2025

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Adopt a resolution amending the 2024/25 or 2025/26 Operating Budget with changes as directed by the City Council.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A – Appropriation and Revenue Amendments to the City of Brentwood FY 2025/26 Operating Budget

4. Exhibit B – Appropriation and Revenue Amendments to the City of Brentwood FY 2024/25 Operating Budget and Amendments to the General Fund FY 2024/25 Fund Balance Commitments

5. Exhibit C – 2025/26 Proposed Budget Amendments

6. Exhibit D - Pay Schedule Effective July 1, 2025

7. Exhibit E - Appropriations Amendments to the City of Brentwood FY 2024/25 – FY 2025/26 Operating Budget ‐ Brentwood Employees' Association ‐ Miscellaneous Office Division Memorandum of Understanding

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

On August 13, 2024, the City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2024-85, directing staff to coordinate Veterans Day celebrations for 2024 in alignment with Option 3 as presented in the staff report, including an annual downtown parade and annual City sponsorship of the Military Veteran Banner Program; amend the FY 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget by $32,000; and annually fund future Veterans Day celebrations in the amount of $40,000.

On August 27, 2024, the City Council accepted an Inclusive and Adaptive Recreation Update report and provided direction to staff to bring back Option 2, as recommended by the Age and Disabilities Friendly Communities Committee, during the mid-year budget process.

On October 8, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-104, 1) approving and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute necessary documents to purchase Toro DXi Central Control System Irrigation Controllers for the Irrigation Controllers, CIP Project No. 352-52451, from SiteOne Landscape Supply in an amount not to exceed $280,852 in FY 2024/25, $274,155 plus a funding authorization contingency amount of $25,210 for a not to exceed funding authorization amount of $299,365 in FY 2025/26, $288,132 plus a funding authorization contingency amount of $55,639 for a not to exceed funding authorization amount of $343,771 in FY 2026/27, for a grand total not to exceed spending authority of $923,988 for the project; 2) amending the 2024/25 – 2025/26 Operating Budget for the associated funding transfers; and 3) amending the 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

On October 8, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-105, 1) approving the purchase and installation of playground equipment for Windsor Way Park, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract, in substantial conformance with the attached draft (and any necessary documents) in the amount of $213,611.00, plus funding authorization for a 10% contingency amount of $21,361.10, for a total spending authorization not to exceed amount of $234,972.10 with Yosso Group Inc., dba Specified Play Equipment Co. (SPEC) for the Windsor Way Park Playground Replacement, CIP Project No. 352-52452, 2) amending the 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program, and 3) amending the 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated project funding transfer.

On October 8, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-108, authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement and necessary documents for SCADA System Upgrade Services for the Water and Wastewater Supervisory Control

and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System Upgrade, CIP Project No. 562-56402 in the amount of $1,785,125, plus funding authorization for a 15% contingency of $267,769, for a total not to exceed funding authorization amount of $2,052,894 with W.M. Lyles Co.; 2) amending the 2024/25 – 2028/29 CIP to increase the Water 4 and Wastewater SCADA System Upgrade project sheet by $1,258,917 for a total project cost not to exceed $4,949,917; and 3) amending the 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated project funding transfers.

On October 22, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-112, approving the purchase of one new replacement Schwarze A9 Monsoon street sweeper for the Streets Maintenance Division from Municipal Maintenance Equipment, Inc. in Sacramento, CA; authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary documents in an amount not to exceed $431,520; and amending the 2024/25 Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund budget by $96,033.

On October 22, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-113, 1) approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and Liberty Union High School District regarding the Public Art and Design Academy in the amount of $18,630 2) amending FY 2024/25 or FY 2025/26 Operating Budget, by increasing the Public Art Acquisition Fund by $23,630 for the cost to build the artwork and for City staff to transport, install and complete landscaping of the project and 3) authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the MOU and make minor non-substantive revisions to it, in consultation with the City Attorney.

On November 12, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-116, 1) approving the purchase and installation of playground equipment for Egret Park Playground Replacement, CIP Project No. 352-52450, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a contract, and necessary documents, in the amount of $352,525.71, plus funding authorization for a 10% contingency amount of $35,252.57, for a total funding authorization not to exceed amount of $387,778.28 with Park Planet, a division of Park Associates, Inc. for Egret Park Playground Replacement, CIP Project No. 352-52450, 2) amending the FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 3 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and 3) amending 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated project funding transfer of $52,780 from the Parks and LLAD Replacement Fund.

On November 12, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-118, 1) approving and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute Contract Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with DSS Company dba Knife River Construction (“Knife River”) for the Pavement Management Program 2024 (Asphalt), CIP Project No. 336-31703 (“Project”), in the amount of $98,669.37 for a total not to exceed Contract price of $2,195,447.07; 2) amending the 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”); 3) amending the 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated Project funding transfer; 4) accepting the work performed by Knife River for the Project; and 5) requesting the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder.

On November 12, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-122, 1) approving and Authorizing the City Manager to execute a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Police Officers’ Association for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027; 2)

Approving the Pay Schedule in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 and authorizing the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule as approved by Council in the BPOA MOU; and 3) Adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $717,066; and to the 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $736,150.

On December 10, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-129, 1) authorizing the purchase and installation of a Fleet Management software system for the Public Works Fleet Maintenance Services Division from TT Faster LLC, dba FASTER Asset Solutions in Virginia Beach, VA; 2) authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement and any necessary documents for Fleet Management Information Solution Services in an amount not to exceed $116,330; and 3) amending the 2024/25 Fleet Maintenance Services Fund Operating Budget by $21,330.

On December 10, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-133, 1) approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Police Lieutenants’ Group for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027; 2) approving the Pay Schedule in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 and authorizing the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule as approved by Council in the Brentwood Police Lieutenants’ Group MOU; 3) Adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $87,289; and to the 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $94,914.

On January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-01, authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a grant agreement with Bay Area Air Quality Management District in the amount of $3,218,000 in grant funding for the Fleet Electrification Project, CIP Project No. 337- 37265; amend the 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program Fleet Electrification Project, CIP Project No. 337- 37265; and amend the 2024/25 Other Grant Fund Operating Budget for the associated project funding transfer and grant revenue in the amount of $3,218,000.

On January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-03, authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement and necessary documents with Peregrine Technologies, Inc. in a not to exceed amount of $217,500 over a threeyear term; funding authorization for a not to exceed contingency amount of $57,000; and amend the FY 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $91,500; and amend the FY 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $91,500.

On January 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-09, approving the purchase of one new replacement Schwarze A9 Monsoon street sweeper for $397,200 from Municipal Maintenance Equipment, Inc. in Sacramento, CA for the Streets Maintenance Division and one new medium duty Ford F650 dump truck for $118,700 from Mission Valley Ford in San Jose, CA, for the Wastewater Division; authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary documents in an amount not to exceed $515,900; and amending the 2024/25 Vehicle and Equipment Replacement

Fund Operating Budget by $61,713.

On January 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-10, adopting the appropriations and revenue amendments to the 2024/25 Operating Budget for the City of Brentwood per the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference; and (2) approving the addition of one (1) new full-time position, to begin on or after April 1, 2025, as follows: Recreation Coordinator I/II.

On January 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-11, 1) approving the contract documents, awards the bid, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract and necessary documents for the Public Art Spaces:

Fields of Time Project, CIP Project No. 337-37244, to MARC Builders LLC dba MARC Engineering as the lowest bidder in the amount of $79,942, plus funding authorization for a 10% contingency amount of $7,994 for additional services, for a total authorization not to exceed amount of $87,936, 2) amending the FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program for the Public Art Spaces, CIP Project No. 337-37244, as detailed in the amended CIP project sheet incorporated by reference; and 3) amending the FY 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated funding transfers.

On February 11, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-15, 1) Approving and authorize the City Manager to execute a successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Managers and Confidential Employees Association for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027, 2) approving the Pay Schedule in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 and authorize the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule as approved by Council in the Brentwood Managers and Confidential Employees Association MOU, and 3) adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 and 2025/26 General Operating Budget.

On February 11, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-16, 1) approving and authorize the City Manager to implement the Compensation Summary between the City of Brentwood and the Unrepresented Executive and Senior Management Employees for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027, 2) approving the Pay Schedule in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 and authorize the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule as approved by Council, and 3) adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 Operating Budget in the amount of $213,094; and to the 2025/26 Operating Budget in the amount of $193,775.

On February 25, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-19, 1) approving a memorandum of understanding between the City of Brentwood and Grace Arms of Antioch regarding the payment of $25,000 towards the operation of their Midnight Basketball League which includes a one-time inclusion in the City of Brentwood Activities Guide in 2025; a) Adding provision to require Grace Arms to reach out to Brentwood community members, b) Adding acknowledgment that City will endeavor to include Midnight Basketball information in Activities Guide as soon as practicable and will use social media outreach, as well, c) Adding provision that City will reach out to school district to communicate opportunity; 2) amending the FY 2024/25

General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $25,000 and 3) authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the Memorandum of Understanding and make minor non-substantive revisions to it in consultation with the City Attorney.

On March 11, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-22, 1) approving the contract documents, awards the bid, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute a construction contract and necessary documents, including the use of contingency amounts, for the Sand Creek Sports Complex Phase 1A Project, CIP Project No. 352-52466 to Robert A. Bothman, Inc., dba Robert Bothman Construction, as the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in the amount of $18,285,788, plus funding authorization for a 10% contingency amount of $1,828,579, for a total authorization not to exceed amount of $20,114,367; 2) amending the FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program for the Sand Creek Sports Complex, CIP Project No. 352-52466, as detailed in the amended CIP project sheet, Attachment 3, incorporated herein by reference; and 3) amending the FY 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated project funding transfers.

On March 11, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-24, 1) authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement and necessary documents with Flock Group, Inc. for fiscal year 2024/25 and 2025/26 in the amount of $109,275 plus contingency of $10,725 for a total not to exceed of $120,000 in each fiscal year, and a total agreement amount not to exceed $240,000; 2) amending the FY 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $120,000; and 3) amending the FY 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $103,500.

On March 11, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-26, amending the FY 2024/25 Other Grants Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $121,195.00 for the grant revenue and $121,195.00 for the grant expenditures, to accommodate the distribution of up to $121,194.85 in grant funds secured through the ADU Accelerator Program.

On March 25, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-34, 1) approving and authorizings the City Manager to execute a successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Supervisors and Professional Employees Association for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027, 2) approving the Pay Schedule in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, and authorizes the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule as approved by the City Council in the Brentwood Supervisors and Professional Employees Association MOU, and 3) adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 and 2025/26 Operating Budgets.

On April 22, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-40, 1) approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Employees Association Public Works Division for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027, 2) approving the Pay Schedule in accordance with 2 California Code of Regulations Section 570.5 and authorize the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager to make ministerial revisions to the Pay Schedule as approved by the City Council in the Brentwood Supervisors and Professional Employees Association MOU,

and 3) adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 Operating Budget in the amount of $456,830; and to the 2025/26 Operating Budget in the amount of $304,711.

On May 27, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-57, approving the City of Brentwood’s Consolidated Engineer’s Report for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts, and Final Engineer’s Reports for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 19-3, Landscape & Lighting Assessment District No. 21-1 and Citywide Park Maintenance District No. 98-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26; ordering maintenance of improvements; confirming the diagram and assessments; authorizing levying and collecting assessments; amending the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budgets for the Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts and Citywide Park Maintenance District, including revenues, appropriations, and transfers; and finding that the above actions are exempt from CEQA.

On May 27, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-58, 1) approving the contract documents, awarding the bid, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a contract and necessary documents for the City Facility Audiovisual System Upgrade Project, CIP Project No. 337-37259 to Conti LLC, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in the amount of $962,961.19, plus funding authorization for a 10% contingency amount of $96,296.12 for a total authorization not to exceed amount of $1,059,257.31; and 2) amending the 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program to include the revised project budget; and 3) amending the FY 2024/25 Operating Budget for the associated project funding transfer of $467,858 from the Information Systems Replacement Fund.

On June 10, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-62, 1) approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Brentwood and the Brentwood Employees Association Miscellaneous Office Division for the period of July 1, 2024-June 30, 2027; 2) establishing seven new job classifications, job descriptions, and salary ranges; 3) abolishing 18 obsolete job classifications, job descriptions, and salary ranges; 4) adopting the 2024/25 Pay Schedule in accordance with 2 CCR § 570.5 and authorize the Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager in consultation with the City Attorney to make ministerial revisions to it; 5) adopting Appropriations Amendments to the 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $670,252; and to the 2025/26 General Fund Operating Budget in the amount of $485,417.

On June 24, 2025, the City Council will consider a resolution to adopt the 2025/26 – 2029/30 Capital Improvement Program, including roadway, parks and trails, water, wastewater and community facilities improvements to be constructed during the next five years and amend the 2025/26 Operating Budget to account for all revenues, appropriations, project funding transfers and development impact fee revenue and expenditure budgets as detailed in the 2025/26 – 2029/30 CIP.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BRENTWOOD 1) AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2024/25
AND FY 2025/26 OPERATING BUDGETS, 2) AMENDING THE FY
2024/25 FUND BALANCE COMMITMENTS IN THE GENERAL
FUND AND 3) APPROVING THE FY 2025/26 PAY SCHEDULE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH 2 CCR SECTION 570.5 AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER OF DESIGNEE, IN CONSULTATION WITH

THE CITY ATTORNEY, TO MAKE MINISTERIAL REVISIONS TO IT
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-73,

1. Finding the action to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), as it relates to the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and

2. Amending the FY 2023/24 Operating Budget as detailed in Exhibit A; and

3. Amending the 2023/24 fund balance restrictions and commitments in the General Fund, as detailed in Exhibit A, with the exception that the displayed General Plan Update Reserve be reduced by $1,200,000, as a good faith measure during labor negotiations, which amount shall not be subject to Council/Administrative Policy No. 10-5 (‘Budget and Fiscal Policies’), Section

7.1.1.1; and

4. Adopting the revenues and appropriations as detailed in the 2024/25 – 2025/26 Operating Budget as detail in Exhibit B, incorporated herein by reference; and

5. Amending the 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as detailed in the CIP project sheets in Exhibit C; and

6. Approving the addition of ten (10) new positions to the City staff in FY 2024/25, as follows:

One (1) Code Enforcement Officer I/II
One (1) Equity Analyst
Two (2) Solid Waste Equipment Operator I/II
Two (2) Wastewater Collection System Worker I/II
One (1) Wastewater Collection Supervisor
Two (2) Street Maintenance Worker I/II
One (1) Geographic Information System (GIS) Technician; and WHEREAS, from the initial 2024/25 – 2025/26 Operating Budget adoption date through June 10, 2025, the City Council, by separate resolutions, amended various revenue or appropriation budgets within the FY 2024/25 or FY 2025/26 Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, the General Fund is budgeted to maintain 30% undesignated reserves for FY 2024/25; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brentwood has reviewed the recommended FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 Operating Budget amendments and General Fund commitments.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood hereby:
1) adopts the appropriations and revenue amendments to the FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 Operating Budgets for the City of Brentwood per the attached Exhibits A, B and C, which are incorporated herein by reference; and 2) adopts the appropriations amendments to the FY 2024/25 – 2025/26 Operating Budget, as detailed in the attached Exhibit E, which is incorporated herein by reference; and
3) amends the FY 2024/25 fund balance commitments in the General Fund, as detailed in the attached Exhibit B, which is incorporated herein by reference; and
4) approves the FY 2025/2026 Pay Schedule in accordance with 2 CCR Section 570.5, as detailed in the attached Exhibit D, which is incorporated herein by reference, and authorizes the City Manager or Designee, in consultation with the City Attorney, to make ministerial revisions to it.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a special meeting held on the 1
st day of July 2025 by the following vote:

Fund Name Revenues Expenditures Net Effect
General Fund:

Property Tax 261,495 $ - $ 261,495 $
Sales Tax (398,079) - (398,079)
Development 365,857 - 365,857
Other Revenue (net) (138,768) - (138,768)
Personnel - (83,594) 83,594
Legislative - 2,591 (2,591)
Economic Development - 165,853 (165,853)
City Clerk - 53,500 (53,500)
Human Resources - 50,000 (50,000)
Successor Agency - 14,107 (14,107)
Police Department - 100,405 (100,405)
Police Dispatch - 61,671 (61,671)
Library - 32,235 (32,235)
Animal Services - 102,255 (102,255)
Parks and Recreation 53,537 527,084 (473,547)
Building - 82,350 (82,350)
Community Enrichment - 5,474 (5,474)
Planning - 210,000 (210,000)
Streets - 2,000 (2,000)
Engineering - 20,100 (20,100)
Transportation - 154,680 (154,680)
CIP Admin - 1,000 (1,000)
Transfers In/Out - (218,725) 218,725
Sub-Total General Fund 144,042 $ 1,282,986 $ (1,138,944) $ Enterprise Funds:

Housing Enterprise - (3,483) 3,483
Housing Rental Trust - (1,769) 1,769
Solid Waste Enterprise - 1,189,245 (1,189,245)
Water Enterprise - (34,068) 34,068
Wastewater Enterprise - (38,768) 38,768
Other Funds:

Citywide Park Assessment District - (11,356) 11,356
Parks and Trails Development Impact Fee - 105,282 (105,282) Agriculture Land Administration - 77,266 (77,266)
Agriculture Land Acquisition - 174,593 (174,593)
Information Systems - 158,809 (158,809)
Vehicle and Equipment Replacement - 667,432 (667,432)
Information Systems Replacement - (130,000) 130,000
Facilities Replacement - 520,400 (520,400)
Fleet Maintenance Services - (4,247) 4,247
Facilities Maintenance Services - (3,911) 3,911
Insurance (350,000) (350,000) -
Sub-Total Enterprise and Other Funds 2 (350,000) ,315,425 (2,665,425) Total FY 2025/26 Amendments (205,958) $ 3,598,411 $ (3,804,369) $

EXHIBIT A
Appropriation and Revenue Amendments to the City of Brentwood FY 2025/26 Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Mid-Term Budget Amendments
Increase (Decrease)

Fund Name Revenue Expenditure Net Effect on Fund
General Fund:

Other Revenue 98,830 $ - $ 98,830 $
Sub-Total General Fund 98,830 - 98,830
Other Funds:

Parks and Trails Development Impact Fee - $ 98,830 $ $ (98,830) Asset Forfeiture - 238 (238)
Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts - 51,195 (51,195) Subtotal Other Funds - 150,263 (150,263)
Total 2024/25 Amendments 98,830 $ 150,263 $ (51,433) $
FY 2023/24
Final Original Amended
Restricted:

Brentwood Blvd Improvements $ - 678,000 $ - $
Total Restricted 678,000 - -
Committed:

General Plan Update $ 242,600 282,700 $ 622,600 $
City Council Redistricting 125,000 100,000 125,000
Future Capital Projects 800,000 800,000 800,000
Future Strategic Initiatives 374,616 - 364,960
Police Department 5th Beat 2,363,275 2,363,275 2,363,275 Successor Agency Payment Plan 2,087,999 687,303 687,303 Total Committed 4,218,178 6,008,590 4,963,138
Total Restricted and Committed 6,686,590 $ 4,218,178 $ 4,963,138 $ Increase (Decrease)
General Fund 2024/25 Fund Balance Restrictions and Commitments FY 2024/25

EXHIBIT B
Appropriation and Revenue Amendments to the City of Brentwood FY 2024/25 Operating Budget and Amendments to the General Fund FY 2024/25 Fund Balance Commitments Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget Amendments

EXHIBIT C
2025/26 PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENTS

GENERAL FUND
Revenues
Property taxes are the largest single source of revenue for the General Fund.

Property tax revenue is based on the assessed valuation of property in the City. The Contra Costa County assessor will use property values as of December 31, 2024 to develop the FY 2025/26 assessed valuation, which is expected to be announced on July 1, 2025. The most current property tax consultant projections support a 3.87% increase in assessed valuation for FY 2025/26. This is slightly higher than the budgeted estimate; accordingly, a $261,495 in property tax-related revenue is proposed for FY 2025/26. This amendment will bring the budget for all property taxrelated revenue to $27.5 million for FY 2025/26.

Sales taxes are the second largest source of revenue for the General Fund. Recently, with reduced discretionary consumer spending, sales tax growth rates have softened and are projected to continue to slow, with a downturn possible in certain business categories. Current projections from the City’s sales tax consultant estimate FY 2025/26 sales tax revenues will be $398,079 lower than the current budget. This estimate includes a conservative estimate of sales tax revenue from the new Costco, which opened in March 2025. After this adjustment, the sales tax revenue budget would be approximately $12.9 million for FY 2025/26.

Development revenue in FY 2025/26 is now projected to be $365,857 higher than originally budgeted due primarily to the increase in permitting fees approved by the City Council earlier this year.

Other revenue from a variety of sources is projected to decrease by about $85,200, as detailed below:
 Miscellaneous revenues are expected to have a decrease of $138,768 from the original budget made up of a shortfall in real property transfer tax, franchise fees, hotel tax, rental income, capital project personnel reimbursement and fines, offset by anticipated increases in business license fees, motor vehicle inlieu fees, and development impact fee administration reimbursement for parks planning costs.
 Parks and Recreation revenue budget increases of $48,215 and $4,150 are being proposed for increases in recreation program registration and for

C-2
reimbursements for staff assigned to external special events, respectively. An additional $2,500 is projected in donation revenue for amenity dedications.

These amounts are offset by a slight reduction of $1,328 in rental revenue for the Community Center.

Total combined General Fund revenue amendments are an increase of $144,042, which represents approximately 0.2% of the current budgeted revenue.

Expenditures – New Requests
A net expenditure budget decrease of $83,594 is being proposed in Personnel costs in the General Fund, to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($234,214), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($150,620).

Insurance costs are projected to be lower than originally budgeted in FY 2025/26.

A net expenditure budget decrease in transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $218,725 is proposed to reflect the lower estimated costs. This adjustment amount includes all General Fund divisions that incur these type of expenses.

The Legislative division is requesting a $2,591 amendment for increases in League of California Cities and Association of Bay Area Governments dues.

The City Clerk division is requesting an increase of $21,500 for one-time Municipal Code codification contractual services to implement any city Council Municipal Code Review Committee updates. In addition, a $12,000 amendment is being requested for increases in the cost for software services related to electronic signature, campaign and election disclosure and public records management.

Police Department is requesting a net increase in budget of $405. This includes $19,110 for contractual services such as CALID and County radio services; an increase of $14,500 for Automated External Defibrillator (AED) batteries; and an increase of $5,000 for outdoor furniture. These increases are offset by reductions in transcription services, contributions, substation, and software services costs totaling $38,205.

The Police Dispatch division is proposing a net increase of $61,671. This increase is mainly for contractual services and supplies for a phone maintenance agreement for the current 911 dispatch center system of $51,650. This agreement will maintain system operations until a new grant funded 911 system can be installed next year.

An increase of $12,000 is requested for CALID cost increases and an additional $4,000 is being proposed for a new satellite phone. These increases are offset by a reduction in software services costs of $5,979.

An increase in Library costs of $32,235 is proposed to account for an increase in the annual cost for the additional 12 hours per week of operations elected by the City, in addition to the 40 hours provided by the County. This increased cost is made up of

C-3
additional operating costs of $8,004 and $24,231 for the cost for security guard services for the additional 12 hours of operation.

Below is a table summarizing service hour elections by City:

Hours of Service Elected by City
40 46 52 56
Antioch El Cerrito Brentwood Danville
Clayton Hercules Concord Lafayette
Martinez San Ramon Pittsburg Orinda
Moraga Pleasant Hill San Ramon
Oakley San Pablo
Pinole Walnut Creek
Below is a summary of calls for service for the period beginning in January 2024 through early May 2025 (approximately 16 months). There were a total of 10 calls within the timeframe that were specific to the Library.

Nature of the Call
Number of Calls
for Service
Disturbing the Peace 2
911 Unknown 2
Suspicious Circumstance/Person 2
Public Drunkenness 1
Juvenile Complaint 1
Fighting 1
Threats 1
Total Calls for Service 10
An increase of $102,255 in Animal Services costs, provided by Contra Costa County, is proposed based on the County’s updated cost estimates and population allocations.

C-4
Parks and Recreation Department budget increases are proposed for the following:
 Parks Planning – $4,026 for cost increases in training, travel, dues, special services, contractual services – software, and fuel to account for all staff and vehicles allocated to this division.
 Sports and Recreation programs – $40,432 in contractual services and special services resulting from increases in program participation. This $40,432 is fully offset by registration revenues. A budget increase of $28,350 is proposed for contractual services related to adult softball umpire services.  Special Events – $50,000 to fund a celebration for America’s 250th anniversary on July 4, 2026. Although the event will take place in FY 2026/27, budget is being requested in FY 2025/26 as the majority of the costs for the event will be incurred in May and June of 2026.

The Building division is requesting an increase of $32,350 in contractual service for an increase in credit card processing fees ($20,000), offset entirely by increases in credit card surcharge revenue, costs for interactive voice response phone upgrades ($12,000), and a minor increase in permit software costs ($350).

The Community Enrichment division is requesting an increase of $5,474 for increases in contractual services for citation appeals hearing officer services ($3,500) and increased training and supplies costs ($1,974).

The Streets and CIP Administration divisions are requesting a $2,000 and $1,000 budget increase, respectively, for their proportional share of new office furniture in the Engineering Department.

The Engineering Department is requesting a $15,100 budget increase for permits/fees/tolls as a result of increased costs of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program and a $5,000 increase for its proportional share of new office furniture in the Engineering Department.

The Transportation division is requesting a budget increase of $152,680 for traffic signal maintenance, modifications and upgrades. This increase accounts for cost increases resulting from rising levels of maintenance and repair required as the City’s signal equipment ages. A budget adjustment for $2,000 is also requested for the division’s proportional share of new office furniture in the Engineering Department.

Total combined General Fund expenditure amendments for new requests are an increase of $268,750, which represents approximately 0.33% of current budgeted expenditures.

C-5
Expenditures – Amendments for Continuation of Previously Approved Budget Requests
The Police Department division is requesting an increase of $100,000 for continuation of investigative contractual services.

Parks and Recreation Department proposed budget increases are as follows:
 Parks Administration - $10,650 for an increase in communication costs, price increases for annual software costs, and new location and foot traffic data software.
 Adaptive Recreation - $199,301 to account for the FY 2025/26 costs for the Adaptive Recreation Coordinator position personnel costs along with the associated program costs.
 Brentwood Family Aquatic Center - $25,824 for increased part-time salaries due to increased training requirements.
 Community Center - $41,118 for an increase in part-time salaries ($28,717) due to the increased number of City events and additional training requirements and contractual services ($12,401) to account for higher janitorial services contract costs.
 Recreation programs – $10,283 for part-time salaries due to increased gymnastics participation, offset entirely by registration revenues in the same amount, and $25,000 annual costs for the late-night basketball program.  Special Events – $33,020 for part-time staffing and supplies and services costs for the annual Veteran’s Day event.
 External Special Events – $26,000 for part-time salaries to cover external special events, including associated training, and $2,580 for supplies, clothing, safety, and communication costs. These costs are offset by an estimated reimbursement revenue increase of $4,150 after accounting for anticipated fee waivers.
 Davis Camp Historical Site – $500 for ongoing routine maintenance of the monument.

Expenditures – Budget Carryover of Unspent 2024/25 Approved Budget The City Clerk division is requesting a carryover of $20,000 for one–time contractual services to update the Citywide document retention schedule.

The Economic Development division is requesting $165,853 to continue two prior year Strategic Initiatives. This request includes carryover budget for the Brentwood Boulevard and Downtown Incentive Program ($110,000) and the disposition of Cityowned parcels ($55,853).

The Human Resources division is requesting a $50,000 carryover for the development of an Equity Strategic Plan.

C-6
The recreation programs Special Events division is requesting a $30,000 budget carryover due to timing of the City Park Holiday Tree purchase.

A carryover budget of $14,107 in the Successor Agency division is proposed for the continued disposition activities for former RDA-owned parcels.

Finally, the Building and Planning divisions are requesting a carryover of $75,000 for safety improvements in the permit center and $185,000 to continue two prior year Strategic Initiatives for the General Plan Conservation and Open Space implementation plan ($115,000) and the General Plan Implementation Status Update ($70,000).

ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Solid Waste, Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds
The City provides residents with Solid Waste, Water and Wastewater services. The charges for these services (user fees), along with the costs for providing the services, are accounted for in individual Enterprise Funds. These funds are self-supporting and do not receive any General Fund support.

User fees are set in accordance with Proposition 218, which requires that customers be given the opportunity to challenge proposed rates. Rate studies are conducted periodically to ensure the enterprise rates are sufficient to cover: operating expenses, capital improvements, upgrades and costs associated with meeting both State and Federal guidelines and regulations. In June 2023, a new 5-year rate study was approved by the City Council. The following budget amendment requests are specific to each Enterprise:

Solid Waste
The Solid Waste Enterprise Fund accounts for the operation, maintenance and capital costs of the solid waste system.

A budget increase of $993,000 is being proposed for the purchase of a new automated side loader vehicle ($584,000) and new roll-off truck ($409,000), both of which are needed to ensure compliance with Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) organic waste processing. Although staff and the City’s SB 1383 consultants continually seek out grant funding opportunities, no grant funding is currently available for new vehicle costs required to comply with SB 1383 requirements. However, these anticipated additional costs for SB 1383 compliance are included in the current approved five-year Solid Waste rate study.

C-7
An additional $218,000 budget increase is proposed for the replacement of one frontload truck. This request will cover cost increases in excess of the amount that has been set-aside in the replacement fund for this vehicle.

A net expenditure budget decrease of $6,195 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($26,998), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($20,803).

A budget increase of $9,000 is proposed for Solid Waste’s proportional cost share of office furniture for the Assistant Director of Public Works position.

A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $24,560 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

Water
The Water Enterprise Fund accounts for the operation, maintenance and capital costs of the Water system.

A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $32,747 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

A net expenditure budget decrease of $10,321 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($27,056), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($16,735).

A budget increase of $9,000 is proposed for Water’s proportional cost share of office furniture for the Assistant Director of Public Works position.

Wastewater
The Wastewater Enterprise Fund accounts for the operation, maintenance and capital costs of the wastewater system
A net expenditure budget decrease of $8,591 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($28,140), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($19,549).

A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $40,177 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

A budget increase of $10,000 is proposed for Water’s proportional cost share of office furniture for the Assistant Director of Public Works position.

C-8
Housing Enterprise
The Housing Enterprise Fund accounts for the administration of the housing rental units, Affordable Housing and the First-Time Homebuyers program. A net expenditure budget decrease of $1,368 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($2,825), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($1,457). A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $2,115 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

Housing Rental Trust
The Housing Rental Trust Fund accounts for the operation and maintenance of the Housing rental units. A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $1,769 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

OTHER FUNDS
Citywide Park Assessment District
This fund accounts for special benefit assessments levied on property owners for citywide park maintenance. A net expenditure budget decrease of $37 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($7,684), offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($7,647).

A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $11,319 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

Parks and Trails Development Impact Fee
This fund accounts for development fees collected for the design and construction of parks within the City. A budget increase of $105,282 is proposed to account for administration reimbursement to the General Fund for parks planning costs.

Agriculture Land Acquisition and Agriculture Land Administration The Agriculture Land Acquisition Fund accounts for agriculture preservation fees collected from development and the Agriculture Land Administration Fund accounts for the administration of the Agriculture Land Fund activities.

An amendment of $174,593 is being requested in the Agriculture Land Acquisition Fund to carryover unspent funds originally allocated to the Agriculture Business Program Strategic Initiative and would allow this program to continue in FY 2025/26.

An amendment of $77,266 is proposed in the Agriculture Land Administration Fund to carryover unspent FY 2024/25 budget for Nail property legal and contractual services budget in support of the Agriculture Innovation Center project.

C-9
Information Systems
This fund provides a source of funding for the development and coordination of the City’s information system’s needs. A net expenditure budget decrease of $6,377 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($13,815), offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($7,438). A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $10,943 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26.

An increase of $176,129 is requested to account for the increasing cost of software licensing and services, contractual services in support of the implementation of the adopted IT Master Plan and contractual services in support of audiovisual functions.

Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
This fund provides a source of funding for vehicle and equipment replacement. A budget adjustment of $341,390 is being requested to move the replacement of one Solid Waste front loader truck up by one year from FY 26/27 to FY 25/26. A re-budget of $54,077 of unspent 2024/25 approved budget is being requested for replacement of one Police patrol vehicle and one DUI trailer not able to be procured in FY 2024/25.

An increase of $191,965 is requested to account for the change in timing and increased costs to outfit 14 new police vehicles. In addition, an $80,000 budget increase is requested for the replacement of ten police car modems so that they are compatible with upgraded systems.

Information Systems Replacement
This fund provides a source of funding for the replacement of information systems infrastructure including computer hardware and servers, audio visual systems, surveillance systems and the phone system. A budget decrease in the amount of $130,000 is proposed to account for a shift in budget as more systems are moving to cloud-based systems. Increases in the Information Systems Fund reflect this transition away from on premise infrastructure.

Facilities Replacement
This fund provide a source of funding for repairs or the replacement of City facilities.

A budget increase of $161,900 is requested at the Police Department for scale uninterruptible power supply replacements for the data center and server room and an additional $5,000 budget request to replace lobby furniture. A re-budget of $176,000 of unspent 2024/25 approved budget is being requested for replacement of the heating and air conditioning system at the Brentwood Senior Activity Center.

A budget increase of $37,500 is being requested for fire system replacements for

C-10
three warehouse buildings at the Corporation Yard. Lastly, a budget request of $140,000 is proposed to replace and relocate the flagpoles at City Hall.

Fleet Maintenance Services
This fund provides a source of funding for maintenance of all City vehicles, except for Police Department vehicles. A net expenditure budget decrease of $1,153 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($5,119), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($3,966). A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $4,094 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26. A budget increase of $1,000 is proposed for Fleet Maintenance Services’ proportional cost share of office furniture for the Assistant Director of Public Works position.

Facilities Maintenance Services
This fund provides a source of funding for maintenance and repairs of City facilities.

A net expenditure budget decrease of $1,369 is being proposed in personnel costs to account for lower projected Workers Compensation costs ($4,149), partially offset by a projected increase in health insurance premiums ($2,780). A budget amendment to decrease transfers to the Insurance Fund in the amount of $3,542 is proposed to reflect lower estimated insurance costs in FY 2025/26. A budget increase of $1,000 is proposed for Facilities Maintenance Services’ proportional cost share of office furniture for the Assistant Director of Public Works position.

Insurance
This fund provides a source of funding for future insurance costs and unforeseen expenses due to legal matters or lawsuits. Insurance costs for FY 2025/26 are projected to be lower than originally budgeted. An expenditure budget decrease in the amount of $350,000 is proposed to reflect the lower estimated costs. A revenue budget reduction for the same amount is proposed to account for reductions in transfers in from other Funds for their proportional share of the reduced costs.

PAY SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2025
Classification Class Code Bargaining Group STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Effective Date Accountant I 2381 SUPV 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.77 9,231.36 9,692.93 7/1/2025 Accountant II 2382 SUPV 8,802.25 9,242.35 9,704.47 10,189.70 10,699.18 7/1/2025 Accounting Assistant I 3301 MISC 5,506.04 5,781.35 6,070.42 6,373.94 6,692.63 7/1/2025 Accounting Assistant II 3302 MISC 6,077.65 6,381.52 6,700.60 7,035.63 7,387.42 7/1/2025 Accounting Manager 2420 MGMT 12,437.34 13,059.21 13,712.16 14,397.77 15,117.66 7/1/2025 Accounting Supervisor 2390 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Accounting Technician 3320 MISC 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Accounting Technician^ 3320X MISC 7,899.54 8,294.52 8,709.24 9,144.71 9,601.94 7/1/2025 Administrative Assistant I 3001 MISC 5,371.76 5,640.34 5,922.36 6,218.48 6,529.41 7/1/2025 Administrative Assistant II 3002 MISC 5,929.41 6,225.88 6,537.18 6,864.03 7,207.24 7/1/2025 Administrative Assistant II^^ 3002X MISC 6,512.29 6,837.91 7,179.80 7,538.80 7,915.73 7/1/2025 Administrative Supervisor 3040 MISC 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Administrative Technician 3020 MISC 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Assistant City Attorney 1200 ADDR 15,532.52 16,309.15 17,124.62 17,980.84 18,879.89 7/1/2025 Assistant City Clerk 2020 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Assistant City Manager 1100 DIRS 18,924.88 19,871.12 20,864.68 21,907.91 23,003.31 7/1/2025 Assistant Director of Finance and Information Systems 1245 ADDR 15,532.52 16,309.15 17,124.62 17,980.84 18,879.89 7/1/2025 Assistant Director of Finance and Information Systems* 1245X ADDR 15,929.57 16,726.05 17,562.34 18,440.46 19,362.49 7/1/2025 Assistant Director of Public Works 1231 ADDR 15,532.52 16,309.15 17,124.62 17,980.84 18,879.89 7/1/2025 Assistant Engineer 2681 SUPV 10,207.91 10,718.30 11,254.21 11,816.92 12,407.77 7/1/2025 Assistant Planner 2121 SUPV 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.76 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Associate Civil Engineer 2683 SUPV 11,838.04 12,429.94 13,051.43 13,704.02 14,389.20 7/1/2025 Associate Engineer 2682 SUPV 11,267.61 11,830.99 12,422.55 13,043.67 13,695.86 7/1/2025 Associate Planner 2122 SUPV 10,207.91 10,718.30 11,254.21 11,816.92 12,407.77 7/1/2025 Building Inspector I 3141 MISC 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Building Inspector I**** 3141X MISC 8,352.04 8,769.65 9,208.13 9,668.55 10,151.97 7/1/2025 Building Inspector II 3142 MISC 8,802.25 9,242.35 9,704.47 10,189.70 10,699.18 7/1/2025 Building Inspector II**** 3142X MISC 9,208.13 9,668.55 10,151.97 10,659.56 11,192.54 7/1/2025 Chief Building Official 2200 MGMT 14,071.72 14,775.30 15,514.07 16,289.77 17,104.26 7/1/2025 Chief Building Official* 2200X MGMT 14,152.20 14,859.81 15,602.80 16,382.94 17,202.09 7/1/2025 City Attorney 1015 CONTRACT 20,833.33 6/11/2024
City Clerk 2040 MGMT 12,748.28 13,385.69 14,054.98 14,757.73 15,495.61 7/1/2025 City Treasurer/Director of Finance and Information Systems 1115 DIRS 18,012.98 18,913.63 19,859.32 20,852.28 21,894.90 7/1/2025 Code Enforcement Officer I 3181 MISC 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Code Enforcement Officer II 3182 MISC 8,802.25 9,242.35 9,704.47 10,189.70 10,699.18 7/1/2025 Code Enforcement Supervisor 2210 SUPV 10,724.68 11,260.92 11,823.97 12,415.16 13,035.92 7/1/2025 Community Development Technician I 3221 MISC 7,224.41 7,585.63 7,964.91 8,363.16 8,781.32 7/1/2025 Community Development Technician II 3222 MISC 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025

MONTHLY SALARY
Salary Range for Incumbent as of 2/11/2025*, 3/25/2025**, 4/22/2025***, 6/10/2025****, ^former Accounting Specialist, ^^Former Human Resources Assistant II Page 1 of 7

EXHIBIT D

PAY SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2025
Classification Class Code Bargaining Group STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Effective Date

MONTHLY SALARY
Community Service Officer I 6001 MISC 6,077.65 6,381.52 6,700.60 7,035.63 7,387.42 7/1/2025 Community Service Officer II 6002 MISC 6,708.59 7,044.01 7,396.21 7,766.02 8,154.32 7/1/2025 Construction Inspector I 3481 MISC 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Construction Inspector I**** 3481X MISC 8,352.04 8,769.65 9,208.13 9,668.55 10,151.97 7/1/2025 Construction Inspector II 3482 MISC 8,802.25 9,242.35 9,704.47 10,189.70 10,699.18 7/1/2025 Construction Inspector II**** 3482X MISC 9,208.13 9,668.55 10,151.97 10,659.56 11,192.54 7/1/2025 Cross-Connection Control Specialist 4060 PWKS 7,779.90 8,168.90 8,577.35 9,006.21 9,456.52 7/1/2025 Deputy City Attorney 2100 ADDR 12,748.28 13,385.69 14,054.98 14,757.73 15,495.61 7/1/2025 Development Services Manager 2170 MGMT 13,393.66 14,063.34 14,766.51 15,504.84 16,280.08 7/1/2025 Director of Community Development 1130 DIRS 18,012.98 18,913.63 19,859.32 20,852.28 21,894.90 7/1/2025 Director of Engineering/City Engineer 1170 DIRS 18,012.98 18,913.63 19,859.32 20,852.28 21,894.90 7/1/2025 Director of Human Resources/Risk Manager 1180 DIRS 18,012.98 18,913.63 19,859.32 20,852.28 21,894.90 7/1/2025 Director of Parks and Recreation 1145 DIRS 18,012.98 18,913.63 19,859.32 20,852.28 21,894.90 7/1/2025 Director of Public Works 1160 DIRS 18,012.98 18,913.63 19,859.32 20,852.28 21,894.90 7/1/2025 Economic Development Manager 2240 MGMT 13,393.66 14,063.34 14,766.51 15,504.84 16,280.08 7/1/2025 Economic Development Manager* 2240X MGMT 14,152.20 14,859.81 15,602.80 16,382.94 17,202.09 7/1/2025 Electrician 4080 PWKS 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.09 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Engineering Manager 2720 MGMT 14,423.50 15,144.68 15,901.91 16,697.01 17,531.86 7/1/2025 Engineering Services Supervisor 2730 SUPV 9,479.05 9,953.00 10,450.66 10,973.19 11,521.85 7/1/2025 Engineering Services Supervisor** 2730X SUPV 9,674.32 10,158.02 10,665.94 11,199.23 11,759.18 7/1/2025 Engineering Technician 3520 MISC 8,378.10 8,797.00 9,236.86 9,698.70 10,183.63 7/1/2025 Engineering Technician**** 3520X MISC 8,411.72 8,832.31 9,273.92 9,737.63 10,224.50 7/1/2025 Environmental Compliance Inspector 3620 MISC 9,479.05 9,953.00 10,450.66 10,973.19 11,521.85 7/1/2025 Executive Assistant 3060 MISC 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 2610 SUPV 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.76 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Facilities Maintenance Worker I 4031 PWKS 5,929.41 6,225.88 6,537.18 6,864.03 7,207.24 7/1/2025 Facilities Maintenance Worker I*** 4031X PWKS 5,936.42 6,233.24 6,544.91 6,872.16 7,215.76 7/1/2025 Facilities Maintenance Worker II 4032 PWKS 6,544.96 6,872.21 7,215.82 7,576.61 7,955.44 7/1/2025 Fleet and Facilities Maintenance Manager 2770 MGMT 11,838.04 12,429.94 13,051.44 13,704.02 14,389.21 7/1/2025 Fleet Supervisor 2750 SUPV 9,479.05 9,953.00 10,450.66 10,973.19 11,521.85 7/1/2025 Fleet Supervisor** 2750X SUPV 9,596.90 10,076.75 10,580.58 11,109.61 11,665.10 7/1/2025 Geographic Information Systems Coordinator 2740 SUPV 10,207.91 10,718.30 11,254.21 11,816.92 12,407.77 7/1/2025 Geographic Information Systems Coordinator** 2740X SUPV 11,467.10 12,040.45 12,642.48 13,274.59 13,938.31 7/1/2025 Geographic Information Systems Technician 3510 MISC 8,378.10 8,797.00 9,236.86 9,698.70 10,183.63 7/1/2025 Housing Program Manager 2250 SUPV 11,549.31 12,126.77 12,733.11 13,369.76 14,038.26 7/1/2025 Housing Program Manager** 2250X SUPV 11,607.67 12,188.04 12,797.44 13,437.31 14,109.20 7/1/2025 Human Resources Analyst I 2071 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Human Resources Analyst II 2072 SUPV 9,958.94 10,456.87 10,979.73 11,528.71 12,105.14 7/1/2025 Salary Range for Incumbent as of 2/11/2025*, 3/25/2025**, 4/22/2025***, 6/10/2025****, ^former Accounting Specialist, ^^Former Human Resources Assistant II Page 2 of 7 Page 764 of 872

PAY SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2025
Classification Class Code Bargaining Group STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Effective Date

MONTHLY SALARY
Human Resources Analyst II** 2072X SUPV 10,078.08 10,581.99 11,111.08 11,666.63 12,249.97 7/1/2025 Human Resources Manager 2080 MGMT 12,748.28 13,385.69 14,054.98 14,757.73 15,495.61 7/1/2025 Human Resources Technician 3120 MISC 7,224.41 7,585.63 7,964.91 8,363.16 8,781.32 7/1/2025 Human Resources Technician**** 3120X MISC 8,402.19 8,822.30 9,263.42 9,726.58 10,212.91 7/1/2025 Information Systems Analyst 2520 SUPV 9,958.94 10,456.87 10,979.73 11,528.71 12,105.14 7/1/2025 Information Systems Analyst** 2520X SUPV 10,290.12 10,804.63 11,344.86 11,912.09 12,507.71 7/1/2025 Information Systems Manager 2540 MGMT 13,728.50 14,414.92 15,135.66 15,892.45 16,687.07 7/1/2025 Information Systems Manager* 2540X MGMT 14,128.38 14,834.79 15,576.54 16,355.36 17,173.13 7/1/2025 Information Systems Supervisor 2530 SUPV 11,267.61 11,830.99 12,422.55 13,043.67 13,695.86 7/1/2025 Information Systems Supervisor** 2530X SUPV 11,319.13 11,885.09 12,479.36 13,103.30 13,758.49 7/1/2025 Information Systems Technician I 3381 MISC 7,224.41 7,585.63 7,964.91 8,363.16 8,781.32 7/1/2025 Information Systems Technician II 3382 MISC 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Information Systems Technician II**** 3382X MISC 8,235.44 8,647.21 9,079.56 9,533.54 10,010.22 7/1/2025 Interim City Manager 1000 Resolution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,566.64 4/27/2025 Laboratory Analyst 2910 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Laboratory Supervisor 2920 SUPV 11,267.61 11,830.99 12,422.55 13,043.67 13,695.86 7/1/2025 Laboratory Technician I 4261 PWKS 7,405.02 7,775.27 8,164.04 8,572.24 9,000.85 7/1/2025 Laboratory Technician II 4262 PWKS 8,173.76 8,582.44 9,011.56 9,462.15 9,935.26 7/1/2025 Management Analyst I 2001 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Management Analyst II 2002 SUPV 9,958.94 10,456.87 10,979.73 11,528.71 12,105.14 7/1/2025 Management Analyst II** 2002X SUPV 10,078.08 10,581.99 11,111.08 11,666.63 12,249.97 7/1/2025 Mechanic I 4101 PWKS 6,708.59 7,044.01 7,396.21 7,766.02 8,154.32 7/1/2025 Mechanic II 4102 PWKS 7,405.02 7,775.27 8,164.04 8,572.24 9,000.85 7/1/2025 Mechanic II*** 4102X PWKS 7,569.28 7,947.75 8,345.13 8,762.40 9,200.52 7/1/2025 Park Maintenance Manager 2595 MGMT 12,133.99 12,740.69 13,377.72 14,046.60 14,748.93 7/1/2025 Park Maintenance Supervisor 2590 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Park Maintenance Worker I 4011 PWKS 5,929.41 6,225.88 6,537.18 6,864.03 7,207.24 7/1/2025 Park Maintenance Worker I*** 4011X PWKS 5,936.42 6,233.24 6,544.91 6,872.16 7,215.76 7/1/2025 Park Maintenance Worker II 4012 PWKS 6,544.96 6,872.21 7,215.82 7,576.61 7,955.44 7/1/2025 Parks Planner 2620 SUPV 10,207.91 10,718.30 11,254.21 11,816.92 12,407.77 7/1/2025 Payroll Manager 2410 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Payroll Technician 3070 MISC 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Payroll Technician**** 3070X MISC 7,899.54 8,294.52 8,709.24 9,144.71 9,601.94 7/1/2025 Planning Manager 2180 MGMT 14,071.72 14,775.30 15,514.07 16,289.77 17,104.26 7/1/2025 Planning Manager* 2180X MGMT 14,152.20 14,859.81 15,602.80 16,382.94 17,202.09 7/1/2025 Police Captain 1275 ADDR 16,935.26 17,782.02 18,671.13 19,604.69 20,584.92 7/1/2025 Police Chief 1175 DIRS 19,882.96 20,877.10 21,920.95 23,017.00 24,167.85 7/1/2025 Police Dispatch Supervisor 3432 MISC 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.75 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Salary Range for Incumbent as of 2/11/2025*, 3/25/2025**, 4/22/2025***, 6/10/2025****, ^former Accounting Specialist, ^^Former Human Resources Assistant II Page 3 of 7 Page 765 of 872

PAY SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2025
Classification Class Code Bargaining Group STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Effective Date

MONTHLY SALARY
Police Dispatcher I 3425 MISC 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Police Dispatcher II 3430 MISC 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Police Lieutenant 5000 LIEUT 15,070.14 15,823.64 16,614.83 17,445.55 18,317.85 7/1/2025 Police Officer 6100 BPOA 9,678.55 10,162.47 10,670.59 11,204.12 11,764.33 7/1/2025 Police Records Clerk I 3441 MISC 5,643.70 5,925.88 6,222.17 6,533.28 6,859.95 7/1/2025 Police Records Clerk I**** 3441X MISC 5,654.70 5,937.44 6,234.31 6,546.02 6,873.32 7/1/2025 Police Records Clerk II 3442 MISC 6,229.58 6,541.07 6,868.11 7,211.52 7,572.10 7/1/2025 Police Records Clerk II**** 3442X MISC 6,234.31 6,546.02 6,873.32 7,216.99 7,577.84 7/1/2025 Police Records Supervisor 3470 MISC 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.75 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Police Sergeant 6200 BPOA 11,808.42 12,398.83 13,018.77 13,669.69 14,353.20 7/1/2025 Principal Planner 2160 SUPV 12,394.37 13,014.09 13,664.80 14,348.04 15,065.45 7/1/2025 Project Services Specialist**** 3560X MISC 8,792.88 9,232.53 9,694.15 10,178.85 10,687.81 7/1/2025 Property and Evidence Technician I 6031 MISC 5,929.41 6,225.88 6,537.18 6,864.03 7,207.24 7/1/2025 Property and Evidence Technician I**** 6031X MISC 5,938.36 6,235.27 6,547.03 6,874.40 7,218.11 7/1/2025 Property and Evidence Technician II 6032 MISC 6,544.96 6,872.21 7,215.82 7,576.61 7,955.44 7/1/2025 Property and Evidence Technician II**** 6032X MISC 6,547.03 6,874.40 7,218.11 7,579.02 7,957.97 7/1/2025 Public Information Officer 1300 SUPV 9,958.94 10,456.87 10,979.73 11,528.71 12,105.14 7/1/2025 Recreation Coordinator 3420 MISC 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Recreation Manager 2660 MGMT 12,133.99 12,740.69 13,377.72 14,046.60 14,748.93 7/1/2025 Recreation Supervisor 2640 SUPV 9,022.30 9,473.41 9,947.08 10,444.44 10,966.66 7/1/2025 Risk and Safety Analyst 2065 SUPV 9,958.94 10,456.87 10,979.73 11,528.71 12,105.14 7/1/2025 Senior Accountant 2400 SUPV 9,958.94 10,456.87 10,979.73 11,528.71 12,105.14 7/1/2025 Senior Accounting Assistant 3303 MISC 6,385.33 6,704.60 7,039.82 7,391.82 7,761.40 7/1/2025 Senior Building Inspector 3160 MISC 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.90 7/1/2025 Senior Building Inspector**** 3160X MISC 10,126.94 10,633.29 11,164.95 11,723.20 12,309.37 7/1/2025 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 3200 MISC 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.90 7/1/2025 Senior Community Development Technician 3260 MISC 8,802.25 9,242.35 9,704.47 10,189.70 10,699.18 7/1/2025 Senior Community Development Technician**** 3260X MISC 9,116.88 9,572.72 10,051.35 10,553.92 11,081.61 7/1/2025 Senior Community Service Officer 6020 MISC 7,779.90 8,168.90 8,577.35 9,006.21 9,456.52 7/1/2025 Senior Construction Inspector 3500 MISC 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.90 7/1/2025 Senior Construction Inspector**** 3500X MISC 10,126.94 10,633.29 11,164.95 11,723.20 12,309.37 7/1/2025 Senior Engineer 2700 SUPV 12,437.34 13,059.21 13,712.16 14,397.77 15,117.66 7/1/2025 Senior Management Analyst 2010 SUPV 11,549.31 12,126.77 12,733.11 13,369.76 14,038.26 7/1/2025 Senior Management Analyst** 2010X SUPV 11,607.67 12,188.04 12,797.44 13,437.32 14,109.20 7/1/2025 Senior Park Maintenance Worker 4015 PWKS 7,224.41 7,585.63 7,964.91 8,363.16 8,781.32 7/1/2025 Senior Planner 2140 SUPV 11,267.61 11,830.99 12,422.55 13,043.67 13,695.86 7/1/2025 Senior Planner** 2140X SUPV 11,607.67 12,188.04 12,797.44 13,437.32 14,109.20 7/1/2025 Senior Police Records Clerk 3460 MISC 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Salary Range for Incumbent as of 2/11/2025*, 3/25/2025**, 4/22/2025***, 6/10/2025****, ^former Accounting Specialist, ^^Former Human Resources Assistant II Page 4 of 7 Page 766 of 872

PAY SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2025
Classification Class Code Bargaining Group STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Effective Date

MONTHLY SALARY
Senior Property and Evidence Technician 6033 MISC 7,224.41 7,585.63 7,964.91 8,363.16 8,781.32 7/1/2025 Senior Property and Evidence Technician**** 6033X MISC 7,525.53 7,901.80 8,296.90 8,711.74 9,147.32 7/1/2025 Senior Solid Waste Equipment Operator 4180 PWKS 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 4220 PWKS 7,405.02 7,775.27 8,164.04 8,572.24 9,000.85 7/1/2025 Senior Street Maintenance Worker*** 4220X PWKS 7,521.64 7,897.71 8,292.60 8,707.23 9,142.59 7/1/2025 Senior Wastewater Collection System Worker 4043 PWKS 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Senior Wastewater Collection System Worker*** 4043X PWKS 8,125.70 8,531.99 8,958.60 9,406.52 9,876.85 7/1/2025 Senior Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 4304 PWKS 10,207.91 10,718.30 11,254.21 11,816.92 12,407.77 7/1/2025 Senior Water Distribution Worker 4340 PWKS 8,378.10 8,797.00 9,236.86 9,698.70 10,183.63 7/1/2025 Senior Water Distribution Worker*** 4340X PWKS 8,540.77 8,967.81 9,416.20 9,887.01 10,381.35 7/1/2025 Senior Water Services Worker 4420 PWKS 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Senior Water Services Worker*** 4420X PWKS 7,739.38 8,126.35 8,532.66 8,959.30 9,407.26 7/1/2025 Solid Waste and Recycling Manager 2800 MGMT 11,838.04 12,429.94 13,051.44 13,704.02 14,389.21 7/1/2025 Solid Waste Equipment Operator I 4161 PWKS 6,544.96 6,872.21 7,215.82 7,576.61 7,955.44 7/1/2025 Solid Waste Equipment Operator II 4162 PWKS 7,224.41 7,585.63 7,964.91 8,363.16 8,781.32 7/1/2025 Solid Waste Supervisor 2780 SUPV 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.89 7/1/2025 Street Maintenance Worker I 4201 PWKS 5,929.41 6,225.88 6,537.18 6,864.03 7,207.24 7/1/2025 Street Maintenance Worker I*** 4201X PWKS 5,936.42 6,233.24 6,544.91 6,872.16 7,215.76 7/1/2025 Street Maintenance Worker II 4202 PWKS 6,544.96 6,872.21 7,215.82 7,576.61 7,955.44 7/1/2025 Street Sweeper Operator 4240 PWKS 6,544.96 6,872.21 7,215.82 7,576.61 7,955.44 7/1/2025 Street Sweeper Operator*** 4240X PWKS 6,868.82 7,212.27 7,572.88 7,951.52 8,349.10 7/1/2025 Streets Manager 2840 MGMT 11,549.31 12,126.78 12,733.12 13,369.77 14,038.26 7/1/2025 Streets Supervisor 2820 SUPV 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.89 7/1/2025 Streets Supervisor** 2820X SUPV 9,799.33 10,289.30 10,803.76 11,343.95 11,911.15 7/1/2025 Utilities Maintenance Mechanic 4130 PWKS 8,802.25 9,242.35 9,704.47 10,189.70 10,699.18 7/1/2025 Warehouse Coordinator 4140 PWKS 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Wastewater Collection System Supervisor 2950 SUPV 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.76 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Wastewater Collection System Worker I 4041 PWKS 6,385.33 6,704.60 7,039.82 7,391.82 7,761.40 7/1/2025 Wastewater Collection System Worker I*** 4041X PWKS 6,685.04 7,019.29 7,370.25 7,738.77 8,125.70 7/1/2025 Wastewater Collection System Worker II 4042 PWKS 7,048.21 7,400.62 7,770.65 8,159.18 8,567.14 7/1/2025 Wastewater Collection System Worker II*** 4042X PWKS 7,370.25 7,738.77 8,125.70 8,531.99 8,958.60 7/1/2025 Wastewater Operations Manager 2900 MGMT 13,066.98 13,720.33 14,406.35 15,126.67 15,883.00 7/1/2025 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator I 4301 PWKS 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator II 4302 PWKS 8,378.10 8,797.00 9,236.86 9,698.70 10,183.63 7/1/2025 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator III 4303 PWKS 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.75 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor 2880 SUPV 11,267.61 11,830.99 12,422.55 13,043.67 13,695.86 7/1/2025 Water Distribution Supervisor 2940 SUPV 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.89 7/1/2025 Salary Range for Incumbent as of 2/11/2025*, 3/25/2025**, 4/22/2025***, 6/10/2025****, ^former Accounting Specialist, ^^Former Human Resources Assistant II Page 5 of 7

PAY SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2025
Classification Class Code Bargaining Group STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E Effective Date

MONTHLY SALARY
Water Distribution Supervisor** 2940X SUPV 10,094.75 10,599.49 11,129.48 11,685.95 12,270.25 7/1/2025 Water Distribution Worker I 4321 PWKS 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Water Distribution Worker I*** 4321X PWKS 7,026.52 7,377.85 7,746.73 8,134.07 8,540.77 7/1/2025 Water Distribution Worker II 4322 PWKS 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Water Distribution Worker II*** 4322X PWKS 7,746.73 8,134.07 8,540.77 8,967.81 9,416.20 7/1/2025 Water Efficiency Specialist 4380 PWKS 7,974.39 8,373.12 8,791.78 9,231.36 9,692.94 7/1/2025 Water Operations Manager 2980 MGMT 12,437.34 13,059.21 13,712.16 14,397.77 15,117.66 7/1/2025 Water Production Supervisor 2960 SUPV 9,716.03 10,201.83 10,711.93 11,247.52 11,809.89 7/1/2025 Water Production Supervisor** 2960X SUPV 10,094.75 10,599.49 11,129.48 11,685.95 12,270.25 7/1/2025 Water Production Worker I 4361 PWKS 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Water Production Worker II 4362 PWKS 7,590.15 7,969.66 8,368.14 8,786.54 9,225.87 7/1/2025 Water Service Supervisor 2930 SUPV 9,247.86 9,710.24 10,195.76 10,705.55 11,240.83 7/1/2025 Water Service Worker I 4401 PWKS 6,229.58 6,541.07 6,868.11 7,211.52 7,572.10 7/1/2025 Water Service Worker I*** 4401X PWKS 6,367.20 6,685.57 7,019.84 7,370.83 7,739.38 7/1/2025 Water Service Worker II 4402 PWKS 6,876.30 7,220.11 7,581.12 7,960.17 8,358.19 7/1/2025 Water Service Worker II*** 4402X PWKS 7,019.84 7,370.83 7,739.38 8,126.35 8,532.66 7/1/2025 Salary Range for Incumbent as of 2/11/2025*, 3/25/2025**, 4/22/2025***, 6/10/2025****, ^former Accounting Specialist, ^^Former Human Resources Assistant II Page 6 of 7 Page 768 of 872

A B C D E
Pool Manager $ 23.45 $ 24.62 $ 25.86 $ 27.15 $ 28.51
Assistant Pool Manager $ 21.27 $ 22.33 $ 23.45 $ 24.62 $ 25.86 Lifeguard II $ 19.29 $ 20.26 $ 21.27 $ 22.33 $ 23.45
Lifeguard I $ 17.50 $ 18.38 $ 19.29 $ 20.26 $ 21.27
Aquatics Instructor $ 19.29 $ 20.26 $ 21.27 $ 22.33 $ 23.45 Aquatics Assistant $ 16.50 $ 17.33 $ 18.19 $ 19.10 $ 20.06 Senior Recreation Leader $ 22.11 $ 23.22 $ 24.38 $ 25.60 $ 26.88 Recreation Leader II $ 19.10 $ 20.06 $ 21.06 $ 22.11 $ 23.22 General Laborer $ 16.50 $ 23.22
Recreation Leader I (min wage/benchmark) $ 16.50 $ 17.33 $ 18.19 $ 19.10 $ 20.06

A B C D E
Police Officer Trainee $ 39.05
Minimum Wage Based
Effective 1/1/2025
Non-Minimum Wage Based
Effective 7/1/2025
Pay Schedule
Limited Service

EXHIBIT E
Appropriations Amendments to the City of Brentwood FY 2024/25 – FY 2025/26 Operating Budget ‐ Brentwood Employees' Association ‐ Miscellaneous Office Division Memorandum of Understanding
FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26
Fund Budget Increase Budget Increase
General Fund 524,084 $                     $                    385,705 Housing 6,708                                                        5,339 Solid Waste Enterprise 43,033                                                    31,321 Water Enterprise 23,214                                                    16,257 Wastewater Enterprise 44,024                                                    29,588 Information Systems 21,063                                                    10,685 Fleet Services 4,063                                                        3,261 Facilities Maintenance Services 4,063                                                        3,261 Total 670,252 $                $               485,417

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.2
07/01/2025
SUBJECT: Council approval to implement a lower water rate than previously approved in the FY 2023/24 – 2027/28 Rate Study
DEPARTMENT: Engineering
Finance
Public Works
STAFF: Kerry Breen, City Treasurer/Director of Finance & Information Systems
Casey Wichert, Director of Public Works
Allen Baquilar, Director of Engineering/City Engineer

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
The City Council consideration of implementing a lower water rate (4%) than originally contemplated (6.5%) in the FY 2023/24 – 2027/28 Rate Study, for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff reviews the Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste Enterprise Fund financial condition on an ongoing basis. While the Solid Waste and Wastewater Funds are within the financial parameters envisioned by the last utility rate study, through a combination of cost savings (both FY 2023/24 and FY 2024/25) and project cancellations there is an option in the Water Enterprise Fund to implement a lower annual rate increase than was previously approved by the City Council. While the approved rate study authorized an increase of 6.5%, staff is recommending reducing that to 4% for the 2025/26 fiscal year.

Staff is confident that the financial stability of the Water Fund will remain preserved with the lowered annual rate increase, and there will be no loss of service or ability to respond to potential infrastructure needs. Staff will continue to review all of the utilities on an ongoing basis and will recommend reduced rate increases in future years if conditions allow.

BACKGROUND
The City Council was scheduled to consider this item at its June 24, 2025 meeting, which was cancelled for lack of a quorum.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.2
07/01/2025
On June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted rate structures for the water, wastewater, and solid waste utilities for Fiscal Years 2023/24 through 2027/28. During staff’s presentation the City Council requested staff to analyze the revenue and expenses of the Enterprise Funds annually to determine if the full rate increases were needed in each subsequent fiscal year. As requested, staff analyzed the revenue and expenditures of the utility funds and determined a 4% increase, rather than the adopted 6.5% increase for FY 2025/26 would be sufficient to cover expenditures and maintain the financial health of the Water Enterprise.

Staff’s reasoning for this conclusion is based on the following:
 Cancellation of the Los Vaqueros Expansion Project
 Services and Supply: The quality of water in the Delta has been better than anticipated, resulting in lower treatment costs to convey and treat water than previously expected
 Operational budget savings of 10.7% in personnel costs Wastewater and Solid Waste rates will still need to be increased in line with the rate study, as the financial analysis did not support a change.

Staff recommends the City Council authorize staff to implement a 4% water rate increase rather than the previously approved 6.5% increase for FY 2025/26.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Not Applicable.

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous Action by the City Council is included on Attachment 1

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Not Applicable.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.2
07/01/2025

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Not approve the reduced rate and implement the planned water rate increase of 6.5%.

2. Direct staff to make other changes to the planned water rate increase.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

On July 26, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 96, approving and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Professional Service Agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. for a Comprehensive Water and Wastewater (including Non-potable Water) Rate and User Fee Study, in the amount of $76,290, plus a 10% contingency of $7,629 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $83,919.00.

On August 9, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-102, approving and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute a Professional Service Agreement with HF&H Consultants, LLC. for a Comprehensive Solid Waste Rate and User Fee Study, in the amount of $56,780, plus a 10% contingency of $5,678 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $62,458.

On April 12, 2023, a City Council Workshop was held to outline the utility rate process, identify utility enterprise expenses and present proposed water, wastewater and solid waste utility rates for Fiscal Years 2023/24 through 2027/28.

On April 21, 2023, Public Hearing Notices were sent to all property owners and customers of the parcels served by the City’s Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste utilities. The City also activated a website that provided interested parties access to the cost of service studies, answered frequently asked questions, and provided a rate calculator for customers to estimate their actual bill impact.

On June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-75, accepting and approving the Water and Wastewater Rate Study, and the rate structures for water utility service.

On June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-76 accepting and approving the Water and Wastewater Rate Study, and the rate structures for wastewater utility service.

On June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-77, accepting and approving the Water and Wastewater Rate Study, and the rate structures for solid waste utility service.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD IDENTIFYING USER CHARGES FOR WATER

UTILITY SERVICES, AND ADOPTING REVISED MONTHLY USER
CHARGES FOR WATER SERVICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 14.01 of the Brentwood Municipal Code, the City operates a municipal water system; and
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023- 75, accepting and approving the Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study and adopting rate structures for water utility service for Fiscal Years 2023/24 through 2027/28; and
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2023, the City Council directed staff to review the financial condition of each enterprise to confirm that the full rate increase was required on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, staff has analyzed revenue and expenses and have determined a 4% increase, rather than the adopted 6.5% increase for Fiscal Year 2025/26 would be sufficient to cover expenditures and maintain the financial health of the Water Enterprise; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines as set forth in Title 14, section 15378 of the California Code of Regulations, because it amends a government funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment (§ 15378(b)(4)) and is an administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment (§ 15378(b)(5)). Furthermore, if this Resolution were a project, it would be categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Title 14, Section 15273(a) of the California Code of Regulations, because it establishes rates and charges to fund current operating expenses of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to implement a 4% water rate increase rather than the previously adopted 6.5% increase for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby approve updating the previously adopted rates for Fiscal Year 2025/26 to the rates set forth in Exhibit “A” to this resolution, which is incorporated herein. The foregoing notwithstanding, if costs for 2025-26 increase by more than currently projected, the City may revise the rates for 2025-26 up to the maximum amounts approved in Resolution 2023-75.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a special meeting held on the 1
st day of July 2025 by the following vote:

EXHIBIT “A”
Water rates are comprised of a fixed (base) monthly charge in addition to a charge for the volume of water used

WATER RATES PER MONTH
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Monthly Base Rate
5/8” or 3/4” Meter 28.16 30.00 31.20
1” Meter 41.24 43.93 45.69

73.91 73.91 78.72 81.87
2” Meter 113.13 120.49 125.31
3” Meter 237.31 252.74 262.85
4” Meter 420.31 447.64 465.55
6” Meter 858.20 913.99 950.55
Usage Rate
Residential
Tier 1: Units 1-5 3.18 3.39 3.53
Tier 2: Units 6-14 6.60 7.03 7.31
Tier 3: Units 15-20 8.33 8.88 9.24
Tier 4: Units 21+ 8.43 8.98 9.34
Non-Residential
Tier 1: Units 1-5 3.20 3.41 3.54
Tier 1: Units 6+ 7.98 8.50 8.84
Non-Potable
All Units 1.08 1.19 1.24
Hydrant
All Units 8.91 9.49 9.87
Drought Surcharge
Per Unit
10% Reduction .46 .49 0.51
20% Reduction .95 1.01 1.05
30% Reduction 1.50 1.60 1.66
40% Reduction 2.35 2.50 2.60
50% Reduction 3.16 3.37 3.50
Unit =1,000 Gallons
Rates may be further adjusted in the event that costs that are not within the City’s control, such as water purchased costs, electrical costs, chemical costs, etc., exceed the amount projected. The additional costs may be recovered through the rates at the actual cost paid by the City.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.3
07/01/2025
SUBJECT: Adopt the City of Brentwood Local Roadway Safety Plan DEPARTMENT: Engineering
STAFF: Allen Baquilar, Director of Engineering/City Engineer Anju Pillai, Engineering Manager

TITLE/RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution adopting the City of Brentwood (“City”) Local Roadway Safety Plan.

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15262.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the Local Roadway Safety Plan (“LRSP”) prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., was $47,950. The cost of the LRSP is included in the 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget.

BACKGROUND
The City Council was scheduled to consider this item at its June 24, 2025 meeting, which was cancelled for lack of a quorum.

Federal regulations require that each state have a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (“SHSP”). A SHSP is a statewide data-driven traffic safety plan that coordinates the efforts of a wide range of organizations to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. In coordination with federal, state, local, and private sector safety stakeholders, the SHSP establishes goals, objectives, and challenge areas of traffic safety.

While the SHSP is used as a statewide approach for improving roadway safety, a LRSP is a means for providing local and rural road owners with an opportunity to identify and address unique highway safety needs in their jurisdictions, while contributing to the success of the SHSP. The LRSP offers a proactive approach to

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.3
07/01/2025
address safety needs and demonstrates the City’s responsiveness to safety challenges.

Along with all of the other cities in Contra Costa County, staff has prepared an LRSP (Attachment 2) to establish a framework and process for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing roadway safety improvements on City streets. The LRSP is a localized data-driven plan that provides opportunities to address unique roadway safety needs and reduce the number of fatal and severe injury collisions on roadways within the City of Brentwood. The LRSP also provides a toolbox of countermeasures to address the safety patterns to improve safety at key locations. These countermeasures can be incorporated in future projects to address traffic safety.

The LRSP or its equivalent must be updated and validated at least every five (5) years. The City will then go through the similar process to review crash data, engage with stakeholders and identify new traffic challenge areas and develop recommendations.

Adoption of an LRSP (or equivalent document) is a minimum requirement to be eligible for multiple transportation grants, such as the Highway Safety Improvement Program and the Safe Streets and Roads for All, that fund projects that reduce or eliminate roadway fatalities and injuries. Eligible projects include those that provide safety improvements at both signalized and non-signalized intersections, pedestrian/bike projects and other roadway safety improvements.

Contra Costa Transportation Authority (“CCTA”) has prepared a Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Safety Action Plan (“CCTSAP”). The CCTSAP is intended to support scoping and multi-jurisdiction bundled applications for competitive grant funding application opportunities. The CCTSAP incorporates the LRSPs of each of the jurisdictions throughout Contra Costa County. After review by its Planning Committee on December 5, 2024, the CCTA Board approved the CCTSAP on December 18, 2024 (Attachment 3), with an ability to incorporate revisions thereafter.

CCTA has a contract with Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the funding grantor, to incorporate the countywide LRSPs into the CCTSAP by June 30, 2025, which will also include the City’s adopted LRSP. This incorporation of the City’s LRSP into the CCTSAP will ensure that the City’s efforts to promote road safety are recognized on a regional level and will give the City an advantage when applying for grant funding to implement local and cross-jurisdictional safety projects.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. E.3
07/01/2025

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
Focus Area 1: Public Works, Goal 1 Transportation: Proactively engage and collaborate with regional transportation agencies and stakeholders to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods

PREVIOUS ACTION
Not Applicable.

DATE OF NOTICE
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project involves a planning study for possible future actions, which the City has not approved, adopted, or funded and does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report or negative declaration but does require consideration of environmental factors. Therefore, the City finds that the project is exempt from the CEQA in accordance with CEQA Section 15262.

ALTERNATIVE OPTION(S)

1. Do not approve staff’s recommendation.

2. Request staff to return

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Previous Action

2. Resolution

3. City of Brentwood Local Roadway Safety Plan Final Report

4. CCTA Resolution 21-40-G, as amended

PREVIOUS ACTION
Previous actions related to this agenda item that were taken by the Council are listed below. To view prior actions and materials, and Brentwood Municipal Code references in the staff report, as applicable:
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/meetings, and select the meeting date(s) desired to see the reference materials and videos.
 Visit www.brentwoodca.gov/municipalcode to research references to the Brentwood Municipal Code and search by the code section(s) cited.

On June 25, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-73, the City Council adopted a Resolution adopting the 2024/25 – 2025/26 Operating Budget, which includes funding for the Local Roadway Safety Plan of $47,950.

On June 10, 2025, the City Council passed a motion for this item to be continued to the June 24, 2025 City Council meeting.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRENTWOOD ADOPTING THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD LOCAL
ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN.

WHEREAS, Federal regulations require that each State have a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (“SHSP”); and
WHEREAS, a SHSP is a statewide data-driven traffic safety plan that coordinates the efforts of a wide range of organizations to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads; and WHEREAS, in coordination with federal, state, local, and private sector safety stakeholders, the SHSP establishes goals, objectives, and challenge areas of traffic safety; and
WHEREAS, while the SHSP is used as a statewide approach for improving roadway safety, a Local Road Safety Plan (“LRSP”) is a means for providing local and rural road owners with an opportunity to address unique highway safety needs in their jurisdictions while contributing to the success of the SHSP; and WHEREAS, along with all of the other cities in Contra Costa County, City of Brentwood staff has prepared an LRSP to establish a framework and process for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing roadway safety improvements on City streets; and
WHEREAS, the LRSP is a localized data-driven traffic safety plan that provides opportunities to address unique roadway safety needs and reduce the number of fatal and severe injury collisions on roadways within the City of Brentwood (“City”); and
WHEREAS, the LRSP also provides a toolbox of countermeasures to address the safety patterns to improve safety at key locations and these countermeasures can be incorporated in future projects to address traffic safety; and WHEREAS, the LRSP or its equivalent must be updated and validated at least every five years; and
WHEREAS, adoption of LRSP (or equivalent document) is a minimum requirement to be eligible for multiple transportation grants such as the Highway Safety Improvement Program and the Safe Streets and Roads for All, that targets

projects intended to reducing and eliminating roadway fatalities and injuries, including but not limited to safety improvements at signalized and non-signalized intersections, pedestrian/bike projects and roadway safety improvements; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa Transportation Authority (“CCTA”) has prepared a Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Safety Action Plan (“CCTSAP”); and WHEREAS, the CCTSAP is intended to support scoping and multi-jurisdiction bundled applications for competitive grant funding application opportunities to efficiently apply a Safe Systems Approach to achieve the Countywide Vision Zero policy of achieving zero fatal and severe injuries due to traffic collisions; and WHEREAS, the CCTSAP incorporates the LRSPs of each of the jurisdictions throughout Contra Costa County; and
WHEREAS, after review by its Planning Committee on December 5, 2024, the CCTA Board approved the CCTSAP on December 18, 2024, with an ability to incorporate revisions thereafter; and
WHEREAS, CCTA has a contract with Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the funding grantor, to incorporate the countywide LRSPs by June 30, 2025, which will also include the City’s adopted LRSP; and WHEREAS, this incorporation of the City’s LRSP into the CCTSAP will ensure that the City’s efforts to promote road safety are recognized on a regional level and will give the City an advantage when applying for grant funding to implement local and cross-jurisdictional safety projects; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of the LRSP prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., was $47,950; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the LRSP is included in the 2024/25 General Fund Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, the LRSP involves a planning study for possible future actions which the City has not approved, adopted, or funded and does not require the preparation of an EIR or negative declaration but does require consideration of environmental factors. Therefore, the City finds that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15262.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brentwood does hereby adopt the City of Brentwood Local Roadway Safety Plan, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit ‘A.’
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brentwood at a special meeting held on the 1
st day of July 2025 by the following vote:

LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN

CITY OF BRENTWOOD
Prepared for:

City of
Brentwood
Prepared by:

City of Brentwood LRSP ii May 2025

FINAL REPORT

CITY OF BRENTWOOD

LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Prepared for:

City of Brentwood
Engineering Department
150 City Park Way,
Brentwood, California 94513
(925) 516-5420
Prepared by:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 858-5800
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

May 2025

City of Brentwood LRSP iii May 2025

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The City of Brentwood’s employees and partners were instrumental in the development, review, and refinement of this LRSP. The City of Brentwood and Kimley-Horn would like to express their appreciation to the supporting staff and partners for their participation and contributions.

City of Brentwood
Anju Pillai (Engineering Manager)
Allen Baquilar (Director of Engineering/City Engineer)
Aman Grewal (Associate Engineer)
Michael Maanao (Police Sergeant)
External Agency Stakeholders
Aaron McAlister (Deputy Fire Chief)
Kristen Jobb (Director, Student Services)
Ron Alderman (Lead Electrician – Traffic Signals)
Community Stakeholders
Norm Cohen (Brentwood Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC))
Consultant Team (Kimley-Horn)
Robert Paderna, P.E., RSP1
Zachary Ramalingam, EIT
Zander Dally, AICP

STATUTORY NOTICE
23 U.S.C. § 409: US Code - Section 409: Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway- highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.

City of Brentwood LRSP iv May 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................10

1.1. Document Organization ...............................................................................................10

2. VISION, GOAL, AND OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................................12

3. PROCESS .............................................................................................................................14

3.1. Guiding Manuals..........................................................................................................14

3.1.1. Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners ..................14

3.1.2. Highway Safety Manual .....................................................................................15

3.2. Analysis Techniques ....................................................................................................16

4. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT...................................................................................................17

5. PUBLIC OUTREACH................................................................................................................18

6. REVIEW OF PLANNING DOCUMENTS..........................................................................................23

7. DATA SOURCES.....................................................................................................................24

7.1. Roadway Network........................................................................................................24

7.2. Intersections ...............................................................................................................24

7.3. Crashes.......................................................................................................................24

8. SAFETY TRENDS ....................................................................................................................25

8.1. Brentwood KSI Crashes Compared to Statewide KA Crashes.........................................25

8.2. California OTS Rankings for Brentwood.........................................................................26

8.3. Severity Level...............................................................................................................26

8.4. Annual Crashes ...........................................................................................................31

8.5. Crash Causes ..............................................................................................................32

8.6. Crash Types.................................................................................................................33

8.7. Lane Departure Crashes ..............................................................................................35

8.8. Aggressive and Impaired Driving Crashes......................................................................35

8.8.1. Aggressive Driving Crashes................................................................................36

8.8.2. Impaired Driving Crashes ..................................................................................37

8.9. Non-Motorized Crashes ...............................................................................................40

8.9.1. Bicycle Crashes ................................................................................................40

8.9.2. Pedestrian Crashes ...........................................................................................40

9. DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT...................................................................43

9.1. Framework ..................................................................................................................43

9.1.1. Federal Policies.................................................................................................43

9.1.2. State Policies ....................................................................................................43

9.2. Methodology................................................................................................................44

9.2.1. Underserved Communities................................................................................44

9.3. Demographic and Socioeconomic Assessment ............................................................47

9.4. Crash Data Equity Review ............................................................................................53

10. RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................55

10.1. Engineering Countermeasures ..................................................................................55

City of Brentwood LRSP v May 2025

10.1.1. Crash Modification Factors .............................................................................55

10.1.2. Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox ...........................................................55

10.1.3. High-Severity Crash Locations ........................................................................59

10.2. Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures .......................................................................61

11. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION..........................................................................................63

11.1. Evaluation ................................................................................................................63

11.2. Implementation........................................................................................................63

11.2.1. Near- and Mid-Term Focus Areas ....................................................................63

11.3. Funding....................................................................................................................64

11.3.1. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)..................................................64

11.3.2. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)...............................................................64

11.3.3. Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP)..................................................64

11.3.4. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)...........................................65

11.3.5. California SB 1................................................................................................65

11.3.6. California OTS Grants .....................................................................................65

11.3.7. ABAG Regional Funding Programs ...................................................................66

12. NEXT STEPS..........................................................................................................................67

City of Brentwood LRSP vi May 2025

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Intersection Network Screening Results
Appendix B Segment Network Screening Results
Appendix C Public Comments
Appendix D Summary of Programs, Policies, and Practices for the City of Brentwood

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 — Brentwood LRSP Stakeholder Meeting........................................................................17 Figure 2 — Social Pinpoint Public Comments..............................................................................19 Figure 3 — Summary of Feedback Received via Social Pinpoint....................................................20 Figure 4 — Safety Issues Survey (East Sub-Region)......................................................................21 Figure 5 — Crashes by Severity (2019 - 2023)...............................................................................27 Figure 6 — Citywide KSI Crashes (2019-2023) .............................................................................29 Figure 7 — Citywide Crashes (2019-2023)...................................................................................30 Figure 8 — Annual Crashes (2019 – 2023)....................................................................................31 Figure 9 — Annual KSI Crashes (2019 – 2023)..............................................................................31 Figure 10 — Total Crashes by Cause (2019 – 2023) ......................................................................32 Figure 11 — KSI Crashes by Cause (2019 – 2023).........................................................................33 Figure 12 — Crashes by Type (2019– 2023)..................................................................................34 Figure 13 — KSI Crashes by Type (2019 – 2023)............................................................................35 Figure 14 — Aggressive and Impaired Driving Crashes .................................................................36 Figure 15 — Aggressive Driving Crash Map ..................................................................................38 Figure 16 — Impaired Driving Crash Map.....................................................................................39 Figure 17 — Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes...............................................................................40 Figure 18 — Non-Motorized Crash Map.......................................................................................42 Figure 19 — City of Brentwood 2020 Population by Age and Sex ...................................................44 Figure 20 — Brentwood Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Census Tracts ...............................46 Figure 21 — Collision Victim Demographics by Race/Ethnicity in the City of Brentwood................47 Figure 22 — Types of Disabilities.................................................................................................48

City of Brentwood LRSP vii May 2025
Figure 23 — Mode Share in Brentwood........................................................................................49 Figure 24 — Severe and Fatal Crashes in the City of Brentwood ...................................................50 Figure 25 — Bike and Pedestrian Collisions in the City of Brentwood............................................51 Figure 26 — All Collisions in the City of Brentwood ......................................................................52 Figure 27 — Crash Victims by Gender .........................................................................................53 Figure 28 — Crash Victims by Gender and Age ............................................................................53 Figure 29 — Vulnerable Road User Crashes by Type of Violation ..................................................54 Figure 30 — CMF Calculation .....................................................................................................55

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 — Historical Trends: Brentwood KSI Crashes Compared to Statewide KSI Crashes...........25 Table 2 — Brentwood OTS Ranking (2022)...................................................................................26 Table 3 — KSI Crashes by Facility Type........................................................................................27 Table 4 — Crashes by Severity (2019 – 2023) ...............................................................................28 Table 5 — Brentwood Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox .....................................................56 Table 6 – High-Severity Crash Locations......................................................................................59 Table 7 - Countermeasures for Selected Case Study Locations....................................................60 Table 8 — Brentwood Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures Toolbox ...........................................62

City of Brentwood LRSP viii May 2025

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND TERMINOLOGY
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
ATP Active Transportation Program
ARIDE Advance Roadside Impaired Enforcement
CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEJST Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool
CMAQ California Mitigation and Air Quality
CMF Crash Modification Factor
CRF Crash Reduction Factor
CTC California Transportation Commission
DAC Disadvantaged Communities
DEV Daily Entering Volume
DRE Drug Recognition Expert
EO Executive Order
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
GIS Geographic Information System
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HFST High Friction Surface Treatment
HSM Highway Safety Manual
IIP Interregional Improvement Program
ITIP Interregional Transportation Improvement Program
KSI Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
LRSP Local Roadway Safety Plan
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual

City of Brentwood LRSP ix May 2025
MEV Million Entering Vehicles
NEV Neighborhood Electric Vehicle
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
PD Police Department
PDO Property Damage Only
RRFB Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
RIP Regional Improvement Program
RSTP Rural Surface Transportation Program
RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program
R/W Right-of-Way
SARC School Accountability Report Card
SB Senate Bill
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SRTS Safe Routes to School
SS4A Safe Streets and Roads for All
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TCAS Traffic Collision Analysis System (Draft)
TDM Transportation Demand Model
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System
US ACS United States Census American Community Survey
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled

City of Brentwood LRSP 10 May 2025

1. INTRODUCTION
This Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) identifies factors associated with the most prevalent vehicle crashes occurring in the City and proposes matching countermeasures to reduce or eliminate those crashes. This report identifies emphasis areas to inform and guide further safety evaluation of the City’s transportation network. The emphasis areas include the type of crash, certain locations, and notable relationships between current efforts and crash history. The LRSP analyzes crash data on an aggregate basis as well as at specific locations to identify high-crash locations, high-risk locations, and city-wide trends and patterns. The analysis of crash history throughout the City’s transportation network allows for the following opportunities:
 Identify factors in the transportation network that inhibit safety for roadway users of all modes of travel.
 Improve safety at high-crash locations and locations which experience a disproportionately high number of fatal and severe injury crashes.
 Develop safety measures aligning with the California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Five Es of safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, to encourage safer driver behavior and more favorable severity outcomes.

The process and analysis performed for the City’s LRSP includes a summary of vision and goals, crash history analysis, the establishment of emphasis areas, an equity assessment, a countermeasure toolbox, and a set of policy recommendations. The information compiled will provide a foundation for decision making and prioritization of safety countermeasures and projects that enhance safety equitably for all modes of travel within the City. The expanded implementation section will provide guidance to the City on applying for grant funding from various safety programs.

The intent of the LRSP is to:
 Create a greater awareness of road safety and risks
 Reduce the number of fatal and severe-injury crashes
 Develop lasting partnerships
 Provide support for grant funding opportunities
 Aid in the prioritization of investments in traffic safety

1.1. Document Organization
The LRSP is organized into the following sections:
 Section 1 presents an introduction to the LRSP.
 Section 2 presents the vision, goal, and objectives for the LRSP.  Section 3 presents the LRSP development process including guidance documents and analysis techniques.
 Section 4 presents the project stakeholders.
 Section 5 reviews City planning documents and policies.  Section 6 contains the LRSP data sources.
 Section 7 provides a summary of safety trends.
 Section 8 includes the City’s crash data equity analysis.  Section 9 includes recommended engineering and non-infrastructure countermeasures.

City of Brentwood LRSP 11 May 2025
 Section 10 summarizes the evaluation and implementation of the safety countermeasures.  Section 11 identifies next steps.
Appendices

City of Brentwood LRSP 12 May 2025

2. VISION, GOAL, AND OBJECTIVES
The Brentwood LRSP evaluates the transportation network as well as non-infrastructure programs and policies within the City. Mitigation measures are evaluated using criteria to analyze the safety of road users (drivers and passengers, bicyclists, and pedestrians), the interaction of modes, influences on the roadway network from adjacent municipalities, and the potential benefits of safety countermeasures. This effort utilizes historical data to identify trends and develop a toolbox of countermeasures applicable to conditions in the City that can be used for proactive identification and implementation of opportunities, without relying solely on a reaction and response to crashes as they occur.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) maintains a list of Proven Safety Countermeasures. The list currently has 20 Proven Safety Countermeasures, and LRSPs are included on the list of 20 Proven Safety Countermeasures. Implementation of LRSPs has improved safety in local jurisdictions across the country by providing a guide for local jurisdictions to systematically address the conditions that lead to fatal and severe-injury crashes. They provide a locally developed and customized roadmap to directly address the most common safety challenges in the given jurisdiction. Following discussions with Brentwood staff and a review of existing plans and policies for the area, the following Vision, Goals, and Objectives have been established for this project.

Vision: Support the California vision of moving towards significantly reducing fatalities and severe injuries for all road users.

Goal Objectives
Goal 1: Identify areas with a high risk for
crashes.
• Evaluate the City’s roadway network for
crash activity.
• Identify intersections and segments in
need of mitigation.
• Identify areas of interest with respect to
safety concerns for pedestrians and
bicycles.

Goal 2: Illustrate the value of a comprehensive
safety program and the systematic process.
• Demonstrate the systematic process’
ability to identify locations with higher
risk for crashes based on present
characteristics closely associated with
severe crashes.
• Demonstrate, through the systematic
process, the gaps and data collection
activities that can be improved upon.

City of Brentwood LRSP 13 May 2025
Goal 3: Define safety improvements for the
near-, mid- and long-term, including projects
for HSIP, SS4A and other programs with
funding consideration.
• Create the outline for a prioritization
process that can be used in forthcoming funding cycles. • Demonstrate the correlation between
the proposed safety countermeasures
with the Vision Zero Initiative and the
California State Highway Safety Plan
(SHSP).

Goal 4: Identify emphasis areas to prioritize
countermeasure application.
• Use systematic crash analysis to
identify emphasis areas.
• Prioritize emphasis areas for
countermeasure development.
• Align emphasis areas with City goals &
objectives.
• Align emphasis areas with current City
areas of concern.

Goal 5: Proposed List of Conceptual Priority
Projects for Implementation of
Countermeasures.
• Identify conceptual priority projects for
implementation.
• Identify similar areas where
countermeasures can be
implemented.
• Prioritize these countermeasures for
implementation based on cost, effort,
and timeline.

City of Brentwood LRSP 14 May 2025

3. PROCESS
The primary goal for the City of Brentwood and their safety partners is to provide safe, sustainable, and efficient mobility choices for their residents and visitors. Through the development and implementation of this LRSP, the City will continue its collaboration with safety partners to identify and discuss safety issues within the community.

Guidance on the LRSP process is provided at both the national (FHWA) and state (Caltrans) level, and both agencies have developed a general framework of data and recommendations for an LRSP.

The FHWA encourages:
 The establishment of a working group (Stakeholders) to participate in developing a LRSP  The review of crash, traffic, and roadway data to identify areas of concern  The establishment of goals, priorities, and countermeasures to recommend improvements at spot locations, systemically, and comprehensively
Caltrans guidance follows a similar outline with the following steps:

1. Establish leadership

2. Analyze the safety data

3. Determine emphasis areas

4. Identify strategies

5. Prioritize and incorporate strategies

6. Evaluate and update the LRSP
This LRSP documents the results of data and information obtained, including the vision, goals, and objectives for the LRSP; existing safety efforts; crash analyses; emphasis areas; the City’s existing countermeasure toolbox; and potential countermeasures for select priority locations. The development of the LRSP recommendations considers the Five Es of traffic safety defined by the California SHSP: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies throughout its process.

3.1. Guiding Manuals
The following section describes the analysis process undertaken to evaluate safety within the City at a systemic level. Using a network screening process, locations within the City that will most likely benefit from safety enhancements were identified. Using historic crash data, crash risk factors for the entire network are derived. The outcomes will inform the identification and prioritization of engineering and non-infrastructure safety countermeasures that address certain roadway characteristics and related behaviors that contribute to motor vehicle crashes as well as active transportation users.

This process uses the latest national and state best practices for statistical roadway analysis described in the following sections.

3.1.1. Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners The purpose of Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners (Version 1.7, April 2024) (LRSM) is to encourage local agencies to pursue a proactive approach to identifying and analyzing safety issues, while positioning themselves to be eligible for competitive federal, state,

City of Brentwood LRSP 15 May 2025
and local grant programs for project implementation funding opportunities. A proactive approach is defined as analyzing the safety of the entire roadway network through either a one-time, network wide analysis, or by routine analyses of the roadway network.

According to the LRSM, “The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) – Division of Local Assistance is responsible for administering California’s federal safety funding intended for local safety improvements.”
To provide the most benefit and to be competitive for grant funding, the analysis leading to countermeasure selection should focus on both intersections and roadway segments and be considerate of roadway characteristics and traffic volumes. The result should be a list of locations that are most likely to benefit from the implementation of cost-effective countermeasures, preferably prioritized by benefit/cost ratio. The LRSM suggests using a mixture of quantitative and qualitative measures to identify and rank locations that consider both crash frequency and crash rates. These findings should then be screened for patterns such as crash types and severity to aid in the determination of issues causing higher numbers of crashes and the potential countermeasures that could be most effective. Qualitative analysis should include field visits and a review of existing roadway characteristics and devices. The specific roadway context can then be used to assess what conditions may increase safety risk at the site and systematic level.

Countermeasure selection should be supported using Crash Modification Factors (CMFs). These factors are the peer reviewed product of before-and-after research that quantifies the expected rate of crash reduction that can be expected from a given countermeasure. If more than one countermeasure is under consideration, the LRSM provides guidance on how to apply CMFs appropriately.

3.1.2. Highway Safety Manual
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual (HSM), published in 2010, presents a variety of methods for quantitatively estimating crash frequency or severity at a variety of locations. This four-part manual is divided into Parts: A) Introduction, Human Factors, and Fundamentals, B) Roadway Safety Management Process, C) Predictive Method, and D) Crash Modification Factors.

Chapter 4 of Part B of the HSM discusses the network screening process. The network screening process is a tool for an agency to analyze their entire network as well as identify and rank locations that (based on the implementation of a countermeasure) are most to realize a reduction in the frequency of crashes.

The HSM identifies five steps in this process:

1. Establish Focus: Identify the purpose or intended outcome of the network screening process. This decision will influence data needs, the selection of performance measures and the screening method that can be applied.

2. Identify Network and Establish Reference Populations: Specify the types of sites or facilities being screened (i.e. segments, intersections, or geometrics) and identify groupings of similar sites or facilities.

3. Select Performance Measures: There are a variety of performance measures available to evaluate the potential to reduce crash frequency at a site. In this step, the performance measure is selected as a function of the screening focus and the data and analytical tools available.

City of Brentwood LRSP 16 May 2025

4. Select Screening Method: There are three screening methods described in this chapter:
ranking, sliding window, and peak searching. Each method has advantages and disadvantages; the most appropriate method for a given situation should be selected.

5. Screen and Evaluate Results: The final step in the process is to conduct the screening and analysis and evaluate the results.

The HSM provides several statistical methods for screening roadway networks to identify high risk locations based on overall crash histories.

3.2. Analysis Techniques
Intersections and roadways were analyzed using four crash metrics:
 Number of Crashes
 Equivalent Property Damage Only (HSM Ch. 4)
The initial steps of the crash analysis established sub-populations of roadway segments and intersections that have similar characteristics. For this LRSP, intersections were grouped by their control type (signalized and unsignalized) and segments by their roadway category (arterial, collector, minor collector, and local). Individual crash rates were calculated for each subpopulation. The sub-population level crash rates were then used to assess whether a specific location has more or fewer crashes than expected. These sub-populations were also used to determine typical crash patterns to help identify locations where unusual numbers of specific crash types are occurring.

The network screening process ranks intersections and roadway segments by the number of crashes that occurred at each one over the analysis period and then identifies areas that had more of a given type of crash than would be expected for that type of location. The crash type factors were:
 Crash severity - fatal, severe injury, other visible injury, complaint of pain, and property damage only (PDO)
 Crash type - broadside, rear-end, sideswipe, head-on, hit object, overturned, bicycle, pedestrian, and other
 Environmental factors – lighting and wet roads
 Driver behavior - impaired, aggressive, and distracted driving From the results of the network screening analyses, a short-list of locations was chosen based on crash activity, crash severity, crash patterns, location type, and area within the City to provide the greatest variety of locations covering the widest range of safety opportunities for countermeasure toolbox development. The intent is to populate the safety countermeasure toolbox with mitigation measures that will be applicable to most of the crash activity in the City.

The EPDO method is described in the Highway Safety Manual. This method assigns weighting factors to crashes based on injury level to develop a property damage only score. In this analysis, the injury crash costs were calculated for each location based on the latest Caltrans injury costs. This value is then divided by the injury cost for a property damage only crash. The resulting number is the equivalent number of property damage only crashes at each site. This value allows all locations to be compared based on injury crash costs. (HSM, Chapter 4).

The results of the network screening analysis for both intersections and roadway segments is presented in Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively.

City of Brentwood LRSP 17 May 2025

4. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
As part of the LRSP development, project stakeholders were identified and included in the process to ensure the local perspective was kept at the forefront of this planning effort. A stakeholder group comprised of staff from various City and County departments as well as key community members was formed. A complete list is available in the acknowledgements on page iii.

These stakeholders were called together to offer insight on the safety issues present in the City’s transportation network. The stakeholder group met on April 22, 2025 to review the results of the network screening and crash data analysis, provide comments, and ask questions.

Figure 1 — Brentwood LRSP Stakeholder Meeting

City of Brentwood LRSP 18 May 2025

5. PUBLIC OUTREACH
Figure 2 presents a map of the public comments received on the interactive map via Social Pinpoint.

Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is preparing a Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Safety Action Plan (CCTSAP). As part of this plan, CCTA received public comments through Social Pinpoint for the East County subregion. The CCTSAP project also held a tabling event at a Farmers’ Market in Brentwood in late September 2022 that encouraged residents to provide comments along with a discussion with the project team of common issues in Brentwood. In total, 41 comments on the interactive map and 33 survey responses were collected through Social Pinpoint.

City of Brentwood LRSP 19 May 2025
Figure 2 — Social Pinpoint Public Comments

City of Brentwood LRSP 20 May 2025
Figure 3 — Summary of Feedback Received via Social Pinpoint

City of Brentwood LRSP 21 May 2025
Most of the East Sub-Region survey responses and comments focused on walking and transit as a main topic, with some comments surrounding other related issues. There was a large concern related to schools and crossings/crosswalks. Figure 4 presents some of the safety issues identified in the survey responses for the East sub-region. The top five safety issues that the Eastern sub-region mentioned were pedestrian safety, speeding drivers, intersection safety, unsafe routes to school, and bicycle safety.

Figure 4 — Safety Issues Survey (East Sub-Region)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Large Trucks
Street Sideshows
Lighting
Not Enough Separation Between Modes
Pavement Conditions
Unsafe Hazard
Stop Sign/Red Light Violations
Visibility
Bicycle Safety
Unsafe Route to School
Intersection Safety
Speeding Drivers
Pedestrian Safety
What are some of the safety issues you face in this area?

City of Brentwood LRSP 22 May 2025
Online Social Pinpoint comments received within the East Sub-region were largely focused within Brentwood. Some of the most popular comments heard within the East Sub-region can be found below. A list of all the comments received in the City of Brentwood are found in Appendix C.

Top East Sub-Region Comments

1. “I feel like this intersection should have a light that once a cycle all cars stop and it lets all 4 crosswalks go at the same time. This would seriously cut down on who gets to go when. It so frustrating as a pedestrian but even more so as a driver.” 3 upvotes. [McClarren Rd and Griffith Ln]

2. “The cross walk to go to Brentwood Elementary school is extremely dangerous during drop off every single morning. Need a cross guard and cops. Everyone is always running stop signs and in a rush. Only a matter of time when someone is severely injured.” 3 upvotes. [Brentwood Elementary School]

3. “Trail is on both sides of Lone Tree, but with a stop light only down the way without good path access to the light and too little protection for bikes and pedestrians from such a busy road.” 2 upvotes. [Lone Tree Way and Trail Xing West of Anderson Ln]

4. “4-way crosswalk, only 2 ways protected by a crossing guard during school hours. Heavy traffic at all 4 corners. I have personally almost been hit while walking with my children on the unprotected side of the crosswalk and have witnessed children, walking on their own, almost being hit. The drivers are paying most of their attention to the crossing guard, so the unprotected crosswalks drivers rush through. I have also witnessed the crossing guard while stopping traffic, almost be hit by cars.” 2 upvotes. [McClarren Rd and Griffith Ln]

5. “4-way crossing for students walking/biking to school unsafe from all corners.” 2 upvotes. [McClarren Rd and Griffith Ln]

City of Brentwood LRSP 23 May 2025

6. REVIEW OF PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Existing plans, policies, and projects that were recently completed, planned, or are on-going within the City were compiled at the start of the LRSP process in order to gain perspective on the existing efforts for transportation-related improvements within the City. High-level key points regarding transportation improvements and safety-related topics were identified to inform decision making in this LRSP. The following plans and documents were reviewed:
Capital Improvement Programs, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 City of Brentwood General Plan, 2014
 Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan, 2002
 Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan Update, 2019 City of Brentwood Emergency Operations Plan, 2013
Contra Costa Countywide Vision Zero Action Plan, 2022
Contra Costa Transportation Authority Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP): East County Action Plan, 2023
Contra Costa County Active Transportation Plan
The City of Brentwood seeks to improve roadway safety by implementing the Safe System Approach. The Safe System Approach, as defined in the Caltrans SHSP, is built upon the following principles1
:
• Death and serious injuries are unacceptable
• Humans make mistakes
• Humans are vulnerable
• Responsibility is shared
• Safety is proactive
• Redundancy is crucial
While engineering countermeasures are a critical part of preventing fatal and severe injury crashes, the City also recognizes that policy plays a key role in safety as well. The city performed a literature review of relevant policies and programs to identify other means by which the Safe System Approach and road safety could be further established.

Appendix C presents a summary of local programs, policies, and practices as well as considerations of how they can be improved or enhanced to further support and prioritize road safety.
1 2020-2024 SHSP – Jan 2023 (PDF), Caltrans. January 2023. dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/safety-programs/documents/shsp/2023-shsp-full-report-2020-2024-a11y.pdf Source: What Is a Safe System
Approach? USDOT 2022.

City of Brentwood LRSP 24 May 2025

7. DATA SOURCES
The following data was obtained from the City for use in crash data analysis.

7.1. Roadway Network
The crash analysis, which is described in detail in Section 3, requires each corridor within the City to be classified. The City’s roadway network obtained directly from the City was categorized using FHWA’s roadway classification system provided in the roadway network. The roadway network classification was assigned to each corridor roadway segment as either a major arterial, minor arterial, collector, or local road. This was done in order to compare the functional design and capacity to better stratify analysis results, only comparing roadway segment safety performance with similar peer roadways (i.e., only arterials are compared to arterials, etc.) within the City.

7.2. Intersections
The crash analysis also requires each intersection within the City to be classified by control type.

Intersections throughout the City were classified by control type as either signalized or unsignalized (including roundabouts). The safety analysis also only compares intersection safety performance with similar control types (i.e., signalized intersections are only compared to signalized intersections, etc.) within the City.

7.3. Crashes
Injury collision data for the most recent five-year period (January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2023) was used for the collision analysis. Using data from the past five-year period is sufficient to identify potential trends in crashes by location and types, while not being so long as to have data that would include long-term technology and cultural changes. The collision data was obtained from UC Berkeley’s SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System. Collision records were allocated to intersection and the roadway network segments.

Knowing the impacts of the crash (the injuries or type of damage which occurred) is a key part of assessing the environment and safety factors around the site of the crash. The TIMS dataset used for this analysis categorizes crashes in the following categories:
• 1 – Fatality
 2 – Severe injury
 3 – Other Visible Injury
 4 – Complaint of Pain
Property damage only or “fender bender” crashes that did not result in any forms of injury are not included in this dataset. This LRSP includes crashes which occurred on the City’s roadway network (including intersections which border City limits). However, crashes along Highway 4 were not included as these belong to Caltrans right-of-way and are outside the jurisdiction of the City of Brentwood. It should be noted that though crashes along Highway 4 are not included in this study, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD) is a key stakeholder in the development of this LRSP and is responsible for responding to incidents along Highway 4. CCCFPD’s ability to respond to crashes on Highway 4 is dependent upon the City’s local roadway network and can be impacted by congestion or crashes on local roads.

City of Brentwood LRSP 25 May 2025

8. SAFETY TRENDS
The following sections contain the results of the analysis process which included evaluation of Brentwood fatal and severe injury (KSI) crashes compared to statewide levels, among other evaluations including crashes by severity level, cause, pedestrian, and bicycle crashes.

8.1. Brentwood KSI Crashes Compared to Statewide KA Crashes The California SHSP focuses on 16 challenge areas identified by the SHSP Executive Leadership and Steering Committees after an in-depth analysis of California KSI crash data as well as an extensive statewide outreach process that involved hundreds of diverse traffic safety partners around the state. Collisions can be attributed to 13 of the 16 challenge areas. Table 1 presents a summary of City’s historic challenge areas (2013-2022) by comparing KSI crashes to the statewide KSI crashes.

The City of Brentwood was higher than the statewide average in the following eight areas: Aggressive Driving, Impaired Driving, Intersections, Lane Departure, Young Drivers (15-20), Aging Drivers (≥65), Distracted Driving, and Occupant Protection.

Table 1 — Historical Trends: Brentwood KSI Crashes Compared to Statewide KSI Crashes California SHSP Challenge
Area
Brentwood
Comparison to
Statewide
Percentages
Percent of Fatal and Severe Injury
Crashes (2013-2022)
Differential
Brentwood
Percentages
Statewide
Percentages
Aggressive Driving Higher 51.2% 33.4% 17.8%
Impaired Driving Higher 33.1% 23.9% 9.1%
Intersections Higher 32.2% 24.3% 7.9%
Lane Departure Higher 49.6% 42.1% 7.5%
Young Drivers Higher 17.4% 12.1% 5.2%
Aging Drivers Higher 16.5% 12.8% 3.7%
Distracted Driving Higher 5.8% 4.4% 1.4%
Occupant Protection Higher 13.2% 13.1% 0.1%
Bicyclists Lower 6.6% 7.3% -0.7%
Work Zones Lower 0.8% 1.6% -0.7%
Commercial Vehicles Lower 4.1% 6.7% -2.5%
Motorcyclists Lower 14.0% 20.8% -6.7%
Pedestrians Lower 6.6% 18.9% -12.3%
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2013 – 2022).

Driver Licensing is based on crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting Service (FARS) (2013 – 2022).

Note: Percentages will not add up to 100%, as a fatality or severe injury could have involved multiple Challenge Areas (i.e., a young driver that was impaired and unrestrained).

City of Brentwood LRSP 26 May 2025

8.2. California OTS Rankings for Brentwood
The California OTS publishes annual reports ranking agencies of similar population by their crash profile. Table 2 presents the City of Brentwood’s 2022 (the most recent) OTS rankings. OTS notes that “Number 1 in the rankings is the highest, or ‘worst’” 2 . Compared to other cities of similar
population, Brentwood ranks among the top 50 in Total Fatal and Injury Crashes. Additionally, Brentwood ranks among the Top 50 for crashes involving Drivers under the Influence (< 35), Bicyclists, Composite crashes, Speed Related crashes, Nighttime crashes (9PM-2:59AM), Hit and Run crashes, and DUI Arrests.

Table 2 — Brentwood OTS Ranking (2022)
Crash Category Victims Killed or Injured OTS Ranking
Total Fatal and Injury 167 26/104
Alcohol Involved 14 59/104
Had Been Drinking Driver < 21 1 48/104
Had Been Drinking Driver 21 – 34 8 44/104
Motorcycles 7 54/104
Pedestrians 8 85/104
Pedestrians < 15 1 70/104
Pedestrians 65+ 0 98/104
Bicycle 16 23/104
Bicyclist < 15 4 28/104
Composite 93 29/104
Crash Category Fatal or Injury Crashes OTS Ranking
Speed Related 38 10/104
Nighttime (9:00pm – 2:59am) 19 27/104
Hit and Run 13 42/104
Type Of Arrests Arrests OTS Ranking
DUI Arrests 76 49/104

8.3. Severity Level
Over the observed five-year time period, there were a total of 636 crashes, 8 of which were fatal and 60 of which resulted in severe injuries, as shown in Figure 5. Nearly two-thirds of all crashes (63.1%) resulted in other visible injuries.
2 City of Brentwood OTS Crash Rankings Results, California Office of Traffic Safety. Accessed March 2025. https://www.ots.ca.gov/rankings/brentwood-2022/

City of Brentwood LRSP 27 May 2025
Figure 5 — Crashes by Severity (2019 - 2023)
UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 Eighty-three percent of crashes in the City occurred at intersections, with nearly half of all crashes (43%) occurring at signalized intersections. Table 3 presents the distribution of all crashes, and especially KSI crashes across the City’s various facility types (signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections, and roadway segments). Fifty-one percent of all KSI crashes occurred at unsignalized intersections, followed by 33.8% signalized intersections and 14.7% at roadway segments.

Table 3 — KSI Crashes by Facility Type
Facility Type Total Crashes Percentage KSI Crashes Percentage Signalized
Intersections 276 43.40% 23 33.82%
Unsignalized
Intersections 255 40.09% 35 51.47%
Roadway
Segments 105 16.51% 10 14.71%
Total 636 100% 68 100%
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 Total: 8
Total: 60
Total: 401
Total: 167
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections Roadway Segments

City of Brentwood LRSP 28 May 2025
Table 4 presents the distribution of all crashes by severity across the City’s facility types. Crashes were more common at signalized intersections, followed by unsignalized intersections and roadway segments.

Table 4 — Crashes by Severity (2019 – 2023)
Severity
Signalized
Intersections
Unsignalized
Intersections
Roadway
Segments Total
Crashes % Crashes % Crashes % Crashes %
Fatal 2 0.3% 4 0.6% 2 0.3% 8 1.3%
Severe 21 3.3% 31 4.9% 8 1.3% 60 9.4%
Other Visible Injury 166 26.1% 165 25.9% 70 11.0% 401 63.1% Complaint of Pain 87 13.7% 55 8.6% 25 3.9% 167 26.3%
Total 276 43.4% 255 40.1% 105 16.5% 636 100.0%
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 29 May 2025
Figure 6 — Citywide KSI Crashes (2019-2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 30 May 2025
Figure 7 — Citywide Crashes (2019-2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 31 May 2025

8.4. Annual Crashes
Figure 8 presents the number of annual crashes on roads in the City of Brentwood beginning in 2019.

The year with the most crashes was 2019, with a total of 150 crashes. Annual crashes trended downwards in the years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, with 2020 having the least number of crashes. Annual crashes have generally trended upwards since 2020.

It is likely that the COVID-19 pandemic influenced crash trends in 2020 and 2021. In 2020, the number of daily household trips decreased due to widespread shelter-in-place orders; fewer vehicles on the road could be connected to fewer vehicle conflicts and thus fewer crashes. However, reduced roadway volumes and congestion could also be connected to increased vehicle speeds, a phenomenon that numerous law enforcement agencies have reported. As volumes returned to “prepandemic” levels in 2021, law enforcement agencies in California anecdotally noted that vehicle speeds remained high; it is theorized that this pandemic-era aggressive driving behavior has persisted and is partially contributing to the increase in annual crashes than can be seen since 2020.

Figure 8 — Annual Crashes (2019 – 2023)
Figure 9 — Annual KSI Crashes (2019 – 2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 150
101
126 126 133
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total Linear (Total)
14 11
14 10
19 0
5 10
15 20
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total Linear (Total)

City of Brentwood LRSP 32 May 2025

8.5. Crash Causes
As shown in Figure 10, the most frequently identified crash causes were Unsafe Speeds, Improper Turning, and Traffic Signals and Signs. Crash causes that accounted for less than two percent are not pictured in the figure.

Figure 10 — Total Crashes by Cause (2019 – 2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 Unsafe Speed,
186, 29%
Improper Turning,
140, 22%
Traffic Signals and
Signs, 98, 15%
Automobile Right
of Way, 72, 11%
Driving or Bicycling
Under the Influence of
Alcohol or Drug, 41, 6%
Unknown, 20, 3%
Pedestrian Right of Way, 17, 3%
Pedestrian Violation, 11, 2% Other, 51, 8%

City of Brentwood LRSP 33 May 2025
The most common crash causes for KSI crashes include improper turning, unsafe speed and DUIs as show in Figure 11. Crash causes which accounted for more than one crash are presented in Figure 11. Improper turning is related to vehicles turning when or where it is unsafe to do so; these crashes mostly included hit-object crashes, bicycles, broadsides and sideswipes.

Figure 11 — KSI Crashes by Cause (2019 – 2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

8.6. Crash Types
According to reported data, approximately 636 injury crashes occurred within the City during the fiveyear study period on city owned and maintained roadways. Figure 12 indicates that broadsides and rear ends were the most common crash type within the City, followed by hit-object crashes. A large proportion of rear ends occurred at signalized intersections, while broadsides occurred most commonly at unsignalized intersections. The most common crash type along roadway segments was rear ends.

Improper Turning,
16, 25%
Unsafe Speed, 12,
19%
DUI, 10, 16%
Traffic Signals and
Signs, 9, 14%
Pedestrian
Violation, 5, 8%
Automobile Right
of Way, 4, 6%
Pedestrian Right of Way, 4, 6%
Other Hazardous Violation, 2, 3% Unknown, 2, 3%

City of Brentwood LRSP 34 May 2025
Figure 12 — Crashes by Type (2019– 2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 The most common crash types which resulted in fatal and severe injuries were broadsides and hitobject crashes, followed by crashes involving vulnerable road users (Figure 13). Though crashes involving vulnerable road users (bicycles and pedestrians) accounted for 15% of all crashes, they accounted for a disproportionately higher percentage (29%) of all KSI crashes. 13 34 24 11 11 6 2
Total: 7 Total: 5 Total: 2
77 92
22 22 21 22
16 70
34 35
30 27 26
27 0
20 40
60 80
100
120
140
160
180
Broadside Rear End Hit Object Sideswipe Head On Bike Ped Other Overturned Not Stated Segment Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections

City of Brentwood LRSP 35 May 2025
Figure 13 — KSI Crashes by Type (2019 – 2023)
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 Note: The crash marked as “Other” involved a single-vehicle incident where a motorcyclist lost control and crashed.

8.7. Lane Departure Crashes
Caltrans defines crashes involving lane departure as those with crash types listed as ‘Head-On’, ‘HitObject’, or ‘Overturned’. This also includes instances where a vehicle runs off the road or crosses into the opposing lane prior to the crash. There were 145 lane departure crashes over the study period in the City, with an average of approximately 29 lane departure crashes per year. Of the 145 lane departure crashes, 4 were fatal, 19 were reported with severe injuries, 95 with other visible injuries, and 27 with complaints of pain.

8.8. Aggressive and Impaired Driving Crashes
Figure 14 summarizes aggressive and impaired driving crashes by intersections and segments.

Additional information is included in the following sections. 2 4
1 2
1 8 4
2 4
2 3
5 7
8 5
5 4
1 0
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16
Broadside Hit Object Ped Bike Head On Rear End Sideswipe Overturned Other Segment Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections

City of Brentwood LRSP 36 May 2025
Figure 14 — Aggressive and Impaired Driving Crashes
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

8.8.1. Aggressive Driving Crashes
Aggressive driving includes primary collision factors such as unsafe speed, following too closely and violations related to traffic signals and signs. There were 291 aggressive driving crashes between 2019-2023. One of the crashes resulted in fatalities and twenty-one resulted in severe injuries.

Figure 15 illustrates the aggressive driving crashes within the City. A list of intersection segments of in order of the highest to lowest number of crashes due to aggressive driving is shown below:
• Balfour Rd & Summerset Dr to Fairview Ave
• O’Hare Ave & Sand Creek Rd to Town Center Terrace
A list of the intersections in order ofthe highest to lowest number of crashes due to aggressive driving is shown below:
• Sand Creek Rd and O'Hara Ave
• Balfour Rd and Cortona Way/Eagle Rock Way
• Sand Creek Rd and Shady Willow Ln
• Balfour Rd and Claremont Dr
Balfour Rd and Sellers Ave
41 11
171
10 79
20 Total: 291
Total: 41
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Aggressive Impaired
Segment Signalized Unsignalized

City of Brentwood LRSP 37 May 2025

8.8.2. Impaired Driving Crashes
Impaired driving crashes include all crashes where there was evidence of drug or alcohol use by the driver. Drivers do not need to exceed the legally defined threshold of intoxication to be counted, as Caltrans considers any level of alcohol consumption to have the potential to impact driver responsiveness and decision making. There were 41 impaired driving crashes between 2019-2023, three of which resulted in a fatality and seven of which resulted in severe injuries. Figure 16 depicts the impaired driving crashes within the City. The intersection segment Sand Creek Rd & Fairview Ave to Sandstone Dr was the one segment with a crash due to impaired driving. A list of the intersections in order of the highest to lowest number of crashes due to impaired driving is shown below:
• Lone Tree Way & Brentwood Blvd
• Grant St & Empire Ave
• Grant St & Fairview Ave
• Balfour Rd & Armstrong Way
• Balfour Rd & Rosegate Ave
• Remington St & Walnut Blvd
• Walnut Blvd & McClaren Rd
• Spruce St & Garin Pkwy

City of Brentwood LRSP 38 May 2025
Figure 15 — Aggressive Driving Crash Map
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 39 May 2025
Figure 16 — Impaired Driving Crash Map
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 40 May 2025

8.9. Non-Motorized Crashes
There were a total of 54 crashes involving bicycles and 45 crashes involving pedestrians, as shown in Figure 17 and Figure 18, respectively. Bicycle and pedestrian crashes were most common at intersections, particularly at unsignalized intersections.

Figure 17 — Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023 Figure 18 illustrates the locations of pedestrian and bicycle crashes at intersections within the City.

Additional information on pedestrian and bicycle crashes is in the following sections.

8.9.1. Bicycle Crashes
There were 48 bicycle-involved crashes in the City over the study period. Of the bicycle-involved crashes, 9 were reported with severe injuries, 35 with visible injuries, and 10 with complaints of pain.

The severe injury bicycle crashes occurred at the following locations:
• Sand Creek Rd & Las Montanas St
• Sand Creek Rd and Minnesota Ave
• Minnesota Ave & Valley Green Dr
• Brentwood Blvd & Central Ave
• Lone Tree Way & Ohara Ave (2)
• Lone Tree Way & Double K Rd
• Medallion Dr & Europena Dr
• Spyglass Dr between Augusta Dr and Monterey Ct

8.9.2. Pedestrian Crashes
Over the study period of 2019-2023, a total of 42 pedestrian-involved crashes occurred in the City.

Of the pedestrian-involved injury crashes, 2 crashes were fatal, 9 were reported with severe injuries, 26 were reported with other visible injuries, and 5 with complaints of pain. 2 5
15 18
25 25
Total: 42
Total: 48
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 Pedestrian Bicycle
Segment Signalized Unsignalized

City of Brentwood LRSP 41 May 2025
The fatal pedestrian crashes occurred at the following intersections:
• Brentwood Blvd & Harvest Dr
• Vineyards Pkwy & Solera St
The severe injury pedestrian crashes occurred at the following locations:
• Brentwood Blvd & Maple St
• Griffith Ln & Continente Ave
• Sand Creek Rd & Brentwood Blvd
• Griffith Ln & Shannon Dr
• Blue Bird Ln & Ohara Ave
• Brentwood Blvd & Fir St
• Lone Tree Way & Empire Ave
• Rutherford Circle & Garland Way
• Jennifer St & Garin Pkwy

City of Brentwood LRSP 42 May 2025
Figure 18 — Non-Motorized Crash Map
Source: UC Berkeley SafeTrek Transportation Injury Mapping System 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 43 May 2025

9. DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
This LRSP includes a citywide demographic and socioeconomic analysis to better understand how different population groups in the City of Brentwood are impacted by road safety. The framework used to guide the analysis is followed by a summary of the methodology. The equity analysis considers demographics and collisions, followed by general takeaways related to the equity and safety data. The analysis seeks to inform policy and program recommendations for the City in accordance with state and federal equity goals, with the objective of promoting equitable infrastructure investments which will enhance road safety for all road users.

9.1. Framework
This section applies a socioeconomic and demographic approach to the safety analysis conducted for the LRSP to supplement the technical collision data analysis by identifying any correlations between equity and safety data, in accordance with federal and state guidelines. This ensures that vulnerable and disadvantaged populations can benefit from additional safety considerations.

Meeting the needs of equity populations is a critical step in equitable distribution of resources and outcomes. As such, the equity analysis aims to summarize key safety and equity findings.

9.1.1. Federal Policies
Equity analysis in transportation planning became solidified by two key federal policies: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order (EO) 12898 in 1994. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. EO 12898 directs all federal agencies to develop an Environmental Justice Strategy that, “identifies and addresses the disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.” Both policies mandate transportation agencies to identify, address, and serve disadvantaged communities through their work.

More recently in 2021, EO 14008 was signed establishing Justice40 with the goal that 40 percent of the overall benefits of certain federal investments flow to disadvantaged communities that are marginalized, underserved, and overburdened by pollution. Previously published Justice40 tract maps and tools, specifically the recently archived US DOT Equitable Transportation Community (ETC) Explorer, were utilized in the equity analysis to identify disadvantaged communities. Although the US DOT ETC Explorer has been recently archived, the dataset is critical in identifying historically disadvantaged communities.

9.1.2. State Policies
California SB 535 (2012) directs investments of cap-and-trade funds towards “Disadvantaged Communities” (DACs). The SB 535 DAC Map (2022) was established to identify DACs throughout the state of California.

The equity analysis conducted as part of the LRSP initiated with an analysis of the 2022 California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) SB 535 DAC Map, a 2022 Justice40 tract map, the US DOT ETC Explorer, and the CEJST to determine if any tracts within the city were considered disadvantaged. The equity analysis identified four disadvantaged communities outlined in the

City of Brentwood LRSP 44 May 2025
recently archived US DOT ETC Explorer. See Figure 20 for Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Census Tracts in the City of Brentwood.

9.2. Methodology
Equity demographics were analyzed to better understand the population. The equity analysis builds on the crash data analysis from the LRSP and forms the basis for the equity policy and program recommendations provided.

Demographic data for the city’s population was collected from the United States Census American Community Survey (US ACS) 5-year estimates for 2023 for total population by race/ethnicity, age, and income to identify equity communities within the city. Age was included in the demographic data to capture the city’s young and aging populations.

9.2.1. Underserved Communities
Brentwood is located within an urbanized area with a population of approximately 64,2923 as of 2020. Figure 19 displays the 2020 population in the City of Brentwood broken down by age and sex.

Figure 19 — City of Brentwood 2020 Population by Age and Sex Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 DEC Demographic Profile for the City of Brentwood, Accessed April 2025 The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) has developed a list of SS4A Underserved Communities Census Tracts (historically disadvantaged communities). The disadvantaged census tracts identified in this list exceeded the 50th percentile (75th for resilience) across at least four of the following six transportation disadvantaged indicators. Each of the six disadvantage indicators are assembled at the census tract level using data from the Centre for Disease Control and 3 U.S. Census Bureau, Table DP1 Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics 2020 DEC Demographic Profile, Available at
https://data.census.gov/table/DECENNIALDP2020.DP1?q=profile+brentwood+city&g=160XX00US0608142.

City of Brentwood LRSP 45 May 2025
Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index, Census American Community Survey, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Smart Location Map, US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Location Affordability Index, EPA Environmental Justice Screen, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Resilience Analysis & Planning Tool, and FEMA National Risk Index.

1. Transportation Access disadvantage identifies communities and places that spend more, and longer, to get where they need to go (CDC Social Vulnerability Index, Census America Community Survey, EPA Smart Location Map, HUD Location Affordability Index).

2. Health disadvantage identifies communities based on variables associated with adverse health outcomes, disability, as well as environmental exposures (CDC Social Vulnerability Index).

3. Environmental disadvantage identifies communities with disproportionate pollution burden and inferior environmental quality (EPA EJ Screen).

4. Economic disadvantage identifies areas and populations with high poverty, low wealth, lack of local jobs, low homeownership, low educational attainment, and high inequality (CDC Social Vulnerability Index, Census America Community Survey, FEMA Resilience Analysis & Planning Tool).

5. Resilience disadvantage identifies communities vulnerable to hazards caused by climate change (FEMA National Risk Index).

6. Equity disadvantage identifies communities with a high percentile of persons (age 5+) who speak English "less than well" (CDC Social Vulnerability Index).

City of Brentwood 2025 LRSP 46 May 2025
Figure 20 — Brentwood Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) Census Tracts Source: USDOT ETC Explorer, Accessed August 2024.

City of Brentwood LRSP 47 May 2025

9.3. Demographic and Socioeconomic Assessment
The City of Brentwood is home to a diverse population. This section reports on the demographics data of road users in Brentwood as collected from the US Census Bureau and processed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Bay Area Vision Zero (BayVIZ) System. In terms of race and ethnicity, white people make up the largest population of crash victims by race/ethnicity in Brentwood at 48.8% and Hispanic or Latino origin account for 17.4% of crash victims. Persons of black heritage and other/unknown are overrepresented in fatal and severe injury crashes, accounting for 10.8% and 19.7% of fatal and severe injury crashes though they only account for 9% and 6.6% of the population, respectively. Figure 21 below provides a breakdown of populations by race and ethnicity and crash victims by race and ethnicity in Brentwood.

Figure 21 — Collision Victim Demographics by Race/Ethnicity in the City of Brentwood Source: Bay Area Vision Zero (BayVIZ) System, Fall 2023, Accessed April 2025 According to the 2023 American Community Survey, 29.2% of households in Brentwood speak a language other than English at home. Spanish is spoken in 13.0% of households; other IndoEuropean languages and Asian and Pacific Islander languages are spoken in 5.8% and 9.0% of households, respectively4
. In terms of age, approximately 15.1% of the population in Brentwood is 4 United States Census Bureau, Table S1601 Language Spoken at Home 2023 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Available at
https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2023.S1601?q=Language+Spoken+at+Home&g=010XX00US_160XX 00US0608142.

City of Brentwood LRSP 48 May 2025
65 years and older, and 26.1% of the population is under 18 years old5. Approximately 10.6% of the population in Brentwood is disabled6
. Figure 22 presents a breakdown of the types of disabilities (there is overlap between categories).

Figure 22 — Types of Disabilities
Source: 2023 American Community Survey, City of Brentwood According to 2023 American Community Survey, approximately 2.1% of workers in Brentwood walk to work and 0.2% commute by bike7
. However, cyclist and pedestrians account for 29.5% of fatal and severe injury crashes recorded during the study period. Figure 23 presents the mode share of trips in Brentwood.
5 United States Census Bureau, Table S0101 Age and Sex 2023 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Available at https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2023.S0101?g=160XX00US0608142. 6 United States Census Bureau, Table S1810 Disability Characteristics 2023 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Available at https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2023.S1810?q=disability&g=160XX00US0608142. 7 United States Census Bureau, Table S0801 Commuting Characteristics by Sex 2023 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Available at https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2023.S0801?q=commuting&g=160XX00US0608142.

City of Brentwood LRSP 49 May 2025
Figure 23 — Mode Share in Brentwood
Source: BayVIZ 2025 and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year 2019-2023 The City aims to increase the mode share for these active modes of transportation by making the City’s roadway network safer through infrastructure improvements, education, and community engagement. The options available to the City to improve its roadway network identified in the LRSP countermeasure toolbox will benefit residents, students, and individuals who travel across the City to access destinations. Implementing safety improvements will serve to mitigate disparity by increasing the safety for residents that commute via active transportation.

Approximately 19.1% of the total severe and fatal crashes in the City from 2019-2023 occurred within the disadvantaged communities. Figure 24 presents severe and fatal crashes citywide and within disadvantaged communities. Pedestrian and bicycle collisions in the disadvantaged communities account for approximately 35.7% of all citywide pedestrian and bicycle collisions. Figure 25 presents pedestrian and bicycle collisions citywide and within the disadvantaged communities from 2019-2023. Approximately 29.4% of all citywide injury collisions were located within disadvantaged communities from 2019-2023. Figure 26 presents all citywide collisions by severity and identifies the disadvantaged communities. The disadvantaged community census tracts account for approximately 22.7% of the land area within the City (approximately 2,155 acres of land is designated as a disadvantaged community within approximately 9,510 acres of city area) yet disproportionately experience more overall collisions and more pedestrian and bicycle collisions than the rest of the city.

City of Brentwood LRSP 50 May 2025
Figure 24 — Severe and Fatal Crashes in the City of Brentwood Source: TIMS Crash Data (2019 – 2023).

City of Brentwood LRSP 51 May 2025
Figure 25 — Bike and Pedestrian Collisions in the City of Brentwood Source: TIMS Crash Data (2019 – 2023).

City of Brentwood LRSP 52 May 2025
Figure 26 — All Collisions in the City of Brentwood
Source: TIMS Crash Data (2019 – 2023).

City of Brentwood LRSP 53 May 2025

9.4. Crash Data Equity Review
Crash victim demographics from the TIMS dataset were reviewed, particularly gender and age.

Figure 27 presents a breakdown of crashes by gender. From 2019-2023, approximately 48% of crash victims were female, 51% were male, and 1.1% were not stated.

Figure 27 — Crash Victims by Gender
Source: TIMS Crash Data, 2019-2023
Figure 28 presents a breakdown of crash victims by age. There were 87 crash victims of age 14 or younger, and 126 crashes where the victim(s) were ages 15-19. There were 213 crashes involving young drivers (age 19 or less). Over the study period, there were approximately 105 crashes where the crash victim was 65 years old or older.

Figure 28 — Crash Victims by Gender and Age
Source: TIMS Crash Data, 2019-2023

City of Brentwood LRSP 54 May 2025
Crash data from TIMS ranging from 2019-2023 was reviewed to determine the parties at fault in vehicle-pedestrian/bicycle crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists and is presented in Figure

29. Approximately 82.8% of crashes involving vulnerable road users were due to driver violations.

The most common driver violations were improper turning (turning at a distance unnecessarily far from a curb, turning without using turn signals, or making a type of turn prohibited by signage) and pedestrian right of way violations (making a maneuver from a motor vehicle without respecting the right-of-way of a pedestrian) each account for approximately 17% of vulnerable user collisions.

Followed by traffic signals and signs (collision was caused by inadequate, inconsistent, and/or confusing signage) at 16% and automobile right of way (making a maneuver without respecting the right-of-way of another driver) at 14%. Six percent of crashes involving vulnerable road users were due to pedestrian violations, and 9% were not assigned fault. Pedestrian violations included the following: pedestrian failure to cross at crosswalks between adjacent traffic signal controlled intersections (1%), pedestrian failure to yield ROW when crossing outside of marked and unmarked crossings (4%), and pedestrian failure to follow “WALK” or “WAIT” or “DON’T WALK” signals (1%).

Figure 29 — Vulnerable Road User Crashes by Type of Violation Source: TIMS Crash Data, 2019-2023
Improper Turning
17%
Pedestrian Right of
Way, 17%
Traffic SIgnals and Signs
16%
Automobile Right of
Way 14%
Unknown
9%
Unsafe Speed
7%
Pedestrian Violation
7%
Wrong Side of
Road 4%
Other Improper Driving, 3%
Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence, 2%
Other Than Driver (or Pedestrian), 2%
Brakes, 1% Other Hazardous
Violation, 1%

City of Brentwood LRSP 55 May 2025

10. RECOMMENDATIONS
The following sections provide more information on potential engineering and non-infrastructure safety countermeasures that might address conditions that were observed to contribute to crash activity in the City.

10.1. Engineering Countermeasures
The following sections contain a description of Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) and Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs) associated with the engineering countermeasures toolbox.

10.1.1. Crash Modification Factors
When identifying potential systemic safety improvements, it is important to look at CMFs for the proposed improvements. The CMF Method is found in Part D of the HSM. CMFs are defined as the ratio of effectiveness of one condition in comparison to another condition and represent the relative change in crash frequency due to a change in one specific condition. Countermeasures with CMFs less than one are expected to reduce crashes if applied, while those countermeasures with CMFs greater than one are expected to increase crashes. Figure 30 illustrates the definition of CMFs.

Figure 30 — CMF Calculation
A Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) is similar to a CMF but stated in different terms. A CRF is defined as a percentage of crash reduction that might be expected after the implementation of a given countermeasure at a specific site. In application, the higher a CRF value is, the more effective the countermeasure is at preventing crashes. The countermeasures proposed in this LRSP were chosen because of their effectiveness in reducing crashes, especially those most commonly occurring in the City.

10.1.2. Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox
The systemic improvements identified as most likely effective to be for Brentwood are listed in Table 5, and include a wide range of countermeasures that can be implemented in phases where appropriate. Many of these proposed countermeasures have already been implemented in the City, including but not limited to pedestrian countdown signal heads, conversion of stop-controlled intersections to roundabouts, and installation of retro-reflective backplates on traffic signal heads.

The CMF indicates how effective the countermeasure is at reducing crashes. CMFs and CRFs have been provided for reference to aid the City of Brentwood in understanding potential reductions from crashes by different countermeasures. Caltrans funding levels for each countermeasure are also provided to aid the City in determining what the local match would likely be if the City were to pursue grant funding. Most countermeasures are eligible for Caltrans funding up to 90%, though some are lower.

City of Brentwood LRSP 56 May 2025
Table 5 — Brentwood Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox Countermeasure
Also Addresses
Crash Modification
Factor (CMF)
Crash Reduction
Factor (CRF)
CRF Applies to
Caltrans Funding Cost to Implement
Pedestrian Bicycle All Nighttime Pedestrian and
Bicycle
Signalized Intersections
Modify signal to provide a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) X 0.4 60% X 90% $ Install Left Turn Lane, Add Left Turn Phase 0.45 55% X 90% $$$ Install High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) 0.45 55% X 90% $$$ Install intersection lighting 0.6 40% X 90% $$
Pedestrian scramble X 0.6 40% X 90% $$
Curb extensions X 0.63 37% X N/A $$
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Protected left turn phase 0.7 30% X 90% $$
Convert signal from pedestal-mounted to mast arm 0.7 30% X 90% $$$ Install signs with LED borders as advanced warning 0.7 30% X 90% $$ Install raised median on approaches 0.75 25% X 90% $$
Pedestrian countdown signal heads X 0.75 25% X 90% $
Signal ahead warning signs 0.85 15% X N/A $
Retroreflective backplates 0.85 15% X 90% $
Improve signal timing (coordination) 0.85 15% X 50% $$
Advanced stop bar before crosswalk and bicycle box X X 0.85 15% X 90% $ Install raised pavement markers and striping 0.9 10% X 90% $ Flashing yellow arrow 0.94 6% X N/A $
Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal) Varies Varies X 90% $$$ Convert intersection to mini/compact roundabout (from
signal) Varies Varies X 90% $$
Install a raised intersection X Not Available Not Available X N/A $$ Unsignalized Intersections
Install High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) 0.55 55% X 90% $$$ Pedestrian Signal or Pedestrian High Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK) X 0.45 55% X 90%
$$$
Install all-way STOP control 0.5 50% X 90% $
Directional median openings to restrict turning movements 0.5 50% X 90% $$ Reduced Left-Turn Conflict (R-CUT) intersections 0.5 50% X 90% $$$ Pedestrian refuge island X 0.55 45% X 90% $$
$$$ Requires design and construction of extensive infrastructure improvements $$ Requires procurement and/or minor construction activities $ Requires limited staff resources and can be implemented in-house with current engineering and/or maintenance staff

City of Brentwood LRSP 57 May 2025
Countermeasure
Also Addresses
Crash Modification
Factor (CMF)
Crash Reduction
Factor (CRF)
CRF Applies to
Caltrans Funding Cost to Implement
Pedestrian Bicycle All Nighttime Pedestrian and
Bicycle
Install splitter-islands on minor road approaches 0.6 40% X 90% $$ Crosswalk lighting X 0.6 40% X X 90% $$
Install splitter-islands on minor road approaches 0.6 40% X 90% $$ Add intersection lighting 0.6 40% X 90% $$
Colored bicycle lanes X 0.61 39% X 90% $
Curb extensions X 0.63 37% X N/A $$$
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing with enhanced safety X 0.65 35% X 90% $$$ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Install left-turn lane 0.65 35% X 90% $$
Install flashing beacons as advanced warning 0.7 30% X 90% (if beacons are utilized)
$$
Upgrade pavement markings 0.75 25% X 90% $
Install raised median on approaches 0.75 25% X 90% $$
Clear sight triangles 0.8 20% X 90% $
Install right-turn lane 0.8 20% X 90% $$
Install/upgrade intersection warning/regulatory signs 0.85 15% X 90% $ Install flashing beacons at stop-controlled intersections 0.85 15% X 90% $$ Convert intersection to roundabout Varies Varies X 90% $$$ Retroreflective strips on sign posts Not Available Not Available X 90% $ Install a raised intersection X Not Available Not Available X N/A $$$ Partial street closure or diagonal diverter Not Available Not Available X N/A $$ Full street closure X X Not Available Not Available X X N/A $$ Roadway Segments
Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatment) 0.45 55% X 90% $$$ Install chevron signs on horizontal curves 0.60 40% X 90% $ Remove or relocate fixed object outside of Clear Recovery Zone

0.65 35% X 90% $$$
Install pedestrian median fencing X X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Install bike lanes X X 0.65 35% X 90% $
Add segment lighting 0.65 35% X 90% $$
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) X X 0.65 35% X 90%
$$
Install raised pedestrian crossing X X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ $$$ Requires design and construction of extensive infrastructure improvements $$ Requires procurement and/or minor construction activities $ Requires limited staff resources and can be implemented in-house with current engineering and/or maintenance staff

City of Brentwood LRSP 58 May 2025
Countermeasure
Also Addresses
Crash Modification
Factor (CMF)
Crash Reduction
Factor (CRF)
CRF Applies to
Caltrans Funding Cost to Implement
Pedestrian Bicycle All Nighttime Pedestrian and
Bicycle
Install rectangular rapid flashing beacon X X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) 0.70 30% X 90% $$ Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs 0.70 30% X 90% $$ Install curve advance warning signs 0.75 25% X 90% $
Install impact attenuators 0.75 25% X 90% $$
Install centerline rumble strips/stripes 0.80 20% X 90% $$ Install edge line rumble strips/stripes 0.85 15% X 90% $$ Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting
(regulatory/warning) 0.85 15% X 90% $
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers 0.85 15% X 90% $ Speed feedback signs (mobile or fixed) X X Not Available Not Available X Opportunity for OTS funding
$$
Install lane narrowing treatments (extend curb inward/extend median) X Not Available Not Available X N/A $$
Install a chicane, deviation, or angled slow point Not Available Not Available X N/A $$$ Install speed hump Not Available Not Available X N/A $$ $$$ Requires design and construction of extensive infrastructure improvements $$ Requires procurement and/or minor construction activities $ Requires limited staff resources and can be implemented in-house with current engineering and/or maintenance staff

City of Brentwood LRSP 59 May 2025

10.1.3. High-Severity Crash Locations
The City identified high-severity crash locations as a result of the network screening analysis. Table 6 presents the locations and contains notes for why these locations were prioritized.

Table 6 – High-Severity Crash Locations
Priority Location Crashes EPDO Notes
Sand Creek Rd and Brentwood
Blvd 14 469
3 Severe Injury crashes, 3
Pedestrian crashes, 1 Bike crash, 9
Dark
Balfour Rd and Cortona
Way/Eagle Rock Way 10 431
3 Severe Injury crashes, 6
Broadsides, 7 Aggressive driving
crashes
Lone Tree Way and O'Hara Ave 10 431 3 Severe Injury crashes (2 involved bicycles)
Brentwood Blvd and Sims Rd 5 363 2 Severe Injury crashes. Most crashes related to Improper turning
Brentwood Blvd from Sims Rd to
Lone Tree Way 4 352 2 Severe Injury crashes (study with intersection above) Balfour Rd from City limits to
American Ave 3 342 1 Fatality, 1 Severe Injury crash, adjacent to Heritage High School 1 Existing signal modification project.

Six project case study locations were selected for further analysis and recommendations. For each of these locations, recommended countermeasures were developed to provide a case study to organize projects when applying for funding. These locations were identified through the analysis process based on their crash histories, the observed crash patterns, and their differing characteristics to provide the most insight into potential systemic safety countermeasures that the City can employ to achieve the most cost-effective safety benefits. The countermeasures are listed in Table 7.

An additional set of low-cost countermeasures is also recommended for systemic implementation across the City. These improvements include installing retroreflective signage and traffic signal backplates, as well as a recommendation to follow the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 413 to restrict parking within 20 feet of crosswalks on the vehicle approach side with the goal of improving visibility for all road users (also known as daylighting)8 . AB 413 was signed into law on October 10,
2023, with ticketed enforcement being permitted following January 1, 2025. While daylighting may be conducted with low-cost treatments such as signage, painted curbs, or raised delineators, it is recommended that the City also conduct outreach to inform the public about this new law and its impact in removing parking spaces.
8 AB-413 Vehicles: stopping, standing, and parking. October 10, 2023. Available at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB413

City of Brentwood LRSP 60 May 2025
Table 7 - Countermeasures for Selected Case Study Locations Countermeasure
Crash
Reduction
Factor
(CRF)
Cost
Sand Creek Rd and Brentwood Blvd
Upgrade to high-visibility crosswalks 25% $$
Upgrade signal heads to incorporate
retroreflective backplates 15% $
Upgrade pedestrian push buttons 25% $
Refresh limit lines 10% $
Implement Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 60% $
Balfour Rd and Cortona Way/Eagle Rock Way
Upgrade to high-visibility crosswalks 25% $$
Upgrade signal heads to incorporate
retroreflective backplates 15% $
Install advanced warning beacons on
approaches 30% $$
Upgrade pedestrian push buttons 25% $
Implement Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 60% $
Increased enforcement of speeding and
aggressive driving 5% $
Lone Tree Way and O'Hara Ave
Install colored bicycle lanes through
intersection 39% $
Upgrade signal heads to incorporate
retroreflective backplates 15% $
Install high-visibility crosswalks on all four
approaches 25% $$
Reduce number of receiving lanes on west
side (road diet) 35% $$$
Upgrade pedestrian push buttons 25% $
Implement Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 60% $
Brentwood Blvd and Sims Rd
Install left turn lane along Brentwood Blvd 35% $$$
Refresh limit line 25% $
Upgrade lighting near intersection 40% $$
Refresh center lines and edge lines 25% $

City of Brentwood LRSP 61 May 2025
Countermeasure
Crash
Reduction
Factor
(CRF)
Cost
Brentwood Blvd from Sims Rd to Lone Tree Way
Install speed feedback signage along
Brentwood Blvd 30% $$
Install center left turn lane 30% $$$
Refresh limit lines and center lines 25% $
Improve lighting along segment 35% $$
Balfour Rd from City limits to American Ave
Increased enforcement during school arrival
and dismissal 5% $
Road diet (reduce to one lane in each
direction) 35% $$$
Install retroreflective backplates 15% $
Implement leading pedestrian interval 60% $
Install speed feedback signage 30% $$
Install colored bike lanes 35% $
Consider reducing the number of receiving
lanes on west side (Road Diet) 35% $$
Citywide Systemic Improvements
Install retroreflective backplates on signal
heads 15% $
Implement intersection daylighting per AB 413 11% $
Install retro-reflective signage and strips at
unsignalized intersections 15% $

10.2. Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Countermeasures that Work, Ninth Edition, is a reference to assist safety stakeholders in selecting effective, science-based noninfrastructure traffic safety countermeasures for major highway safety problem areas. While many of the countermeasures are more appropriate to apply at the state-level or require legislative modifications to implement, Table 8 contains countermeasures that have demonstrated effectiveness and could be applied at the City level. Note that while there are several other noninfrastructure countermeasures available, only those which have an effectiveness rating of four stars or higher are presented. Access to Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) and Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) training for law enforcement is not included in the document but are countermeasures that could also be considered for the City.

City of Brentwood LRSP 62 May 2025
Table 8 — Brentwood Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures Toolbox Countermeasure Effectiveness Cost to
Implement Use Time to Implement
Aggressive Driving
Automated enforcement systems (red
light camera systems)
*****
Effective $$$† Medium Medium
Impaired Driving
Publicized Sobriety Checkpoints *****
Effective $$$ Medium Short
High-Visibility Saturation Patrols
(large number of law enforcement
officers patrolling a specific area)
****
Situational $$ High Short
Occupant Protection (Seat Belts, Helmets, Child Seats)
Short-term high visibility enforcement *****
Effective $$$ Medium Medium
Integrated nighttime seat belt
enforcement
(night time seat belt enforcement in
conjunction with High-Visibility
Saturation Patrols for impaired
driving)
****
Situational $$$ Unknown Medium
Distracted Driving
High visibility cellphone/text
messaging enforcement
****
Situational $$$ Low Medium
Effectiveness:
***** Demonstrated to be effective by several high quality evaluations with consistent results **** Demonstrated to be effective in certain situations Cost to Implement:
$$$ Requires extensive new facilities, staff, equipment, or publicity, or makes heavy demands on current resources $$ Requires some additional staff time, equipment, facilities, and/or publicity $ Can be implemented with current staff, perhaps with training; limited costs for equipment, facilities, and publicity †
Can be covered by income from citations
Use:

High: More than two-thirds of states, or a substantial majority of communities Medium: Between one-third and two-thirds of states or communities Low: Less than one-third of states or communities
Unknown: Data not available
Time to Implement:

Long: More than 1 year
Medium: More than 3 months but less than 1 year
Short: 3 months or less

City of Brentwood LRSP 63 May 2025

11. EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

11.1. Evaluation
The success of the LRSP can be evaluated using the general process outlined below. This process can be useful to monitor progress towards implementation of safety improvement projects and strategies, and to determine when updates to the LRSP should be considered.  Law enforcement continues monitoring and recording of traffic incidents on local roadways.  Conduct frequent progress meetings (annually or quarterly) betweenCity staff and a working group (i.e. traffic safety committee) to review the latest crash data, including assessing the effectiveness of safety countermeasures implemented, discussing ongoing traffic safety challenges, and tracking progress on plan implementation.  Maintain a list of focus/priority areas where there are transportation safety concerns based on review of crash data. The list of priority and/or top crash locations can be updated as an outcome of review of updated crash data and trends.
 Perform an update to the plan after no more than five years. It is recommended that updates to the LRSP be approved by City Council and made available to the public in accordance with Caltrans’ Local Roadway Safety Plan guidance.

11.2. Implementation
Implementation of the LRSP can be accomplished through development and implementation of safety improvement projects and strategies, the establishment of new/updated policies and programs, and development/strengthening of relationships with stakeholders.

With regard to projects, the following section identifies potential focus areas for the City in the nearto-mid-term.

11.2.1. Near- and Mid-Term Focus Areas
The opportunities identified in this LRSP provide more of the systemic countermeasures that can be applied within the City. Over the next three to five years, it is recommended that the City concentrate its efforts on the following emphasis areas:

1. Aggressive Driving

2. Speeding

3. Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians & Bicyclists)

4. Intersections with Unconventional Geometries
Analysis conducted at the citywide level indicated that these factors were some of the most frequent influences contributing to crashes within the City. The countermeasure opportunities previously discussed in this report for both systemic and project-specific improvements can be used as a basis for developing projects at locations where addressing these focus areas would be of the most benefit. Projects that address these focused areas can be developed with a high benefit-to-cost ratio (by applying City-wide crash rates), allowing competitive projects to be developed even at sites with little to no direct crash history, but with conditions that might contribute to future crashes.

City of Brentwood LRSP 64 May 2025

11.3. Funding
Competitive funding resources are available to assist in the development and implementation of safety projects in Brentwood. The City should continue to seek available funding and grant opportunities from local, state, and federal resources to accelerate their ability to implement safety improvements throughout Brentwood. The following is a high-level introduction into some of the main funding programs and grants for which the City can apply.

11.3.1. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The HSIP is a Federal program housed under Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. This program apportions funding as a lump sum for each state, which is then divided among apportioned programs. These flexible funds can be used for projects to preserve or improve safety conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, facilities for nonmotorized transportation, and other project types. Safety improvement projects eligible for this funding include:
 New or upgraded traffic signals
 Upgraded guard rails
 Pedestrian warning flashing beacons
 Marked crosswalks
California’s local HSIP focuses on infrastructure projects with national recognized crash reduction factors. Normally HSIP call-for-projects is made at an interval of one to two years. The applicant must be a city, a county, or a tribal government federally recognized within the State of California.

Additional information regarding this program at the Federal level can be found online at:
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/. California specific HSIP information – including dates for upcoming call for projects - can be found at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.html.

11.3.2. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)
The SS4A Grant Program is a federal program established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. A total of $5 billion are available from 2022-2026 in the form of planning grants and implementation grants. Grant applications for projects that implement the Safe Systems Approach, such as those related to speed management, improvements in underserved communities, and vulnerable road users, are encouraged. Implementation grant projects must be identified in an applicant’s qualifying Safety Action Plan. The SS4A Self-Certification Eligibility Worksheet describes the required elements of an Action Plan and can be accessed at: https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2024- 02/SS4A-FY24-Self-Certification-Worksheet.pdf
Additional information about implementation grants can be found at:
https://www.transportation.gov/grants/ss4a/implementation-grants

11.3.3. Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP)
Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a statewide funding program, created in 2013, consolidating several federal and state programs. The ATP funds projects that encourage increased mode share for walking and bicycling, improve mobility and safety for non-motorized users, enhance public health, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Projects eligible for this funding include:
 Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects

City of Brentwood LRSP 65 May 2025
 Bicycle and pedestrian planning projects (e.g. safe routes to school)  Non-infrastructure programs (education and enforcement) This program funding is provided annually. The ATP call for projects typically comes out in the spring.

Information on this program and cycles can be found online at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/

11.3.4. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) provides state and federal gas tax money for improvements both on and off the state highway system. STIP programming occurs every two years.

The programming cycle begins with the release of a proposed fund estimate, followed by California Transportation Commission (CTC) adoption of the fund estimate. The fund estimate serves to identify the amount of new funds available for the programming of transportation projects. Once the fund estimate is adopted, Caltrans and the regional planning agencies prepare transportation improvement plans for submittal. Caltrans prepares the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) using Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds, and regional agencies prepare Regional Transportation Improvement Programs (RTIPs) using Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. The STIP is then adopted by the CTC.

11.3.5. California SB 1
SB 1 is a landmark transportation investment to rebuild California by fixing neighborhood streets, freeways, and bridges in communities across California and targeting funds toward transit and congested trade and commute corridor improvements.

California’s state-maintained transportation infrastructure will receive roughly half of SB 1 revenue:
$26 billion. The other half will go to local roads, transit agencies, and an expansion of the state’s growing network of pedestrian and cycle routes. Each year, this new funding will be used to tackle deferred maintenance needs both on the state highway system and the local road system, including:
 Bike and Pedestrian Projects: $100 million
o This will go to cities, counties and regional transportation agencies to build or convert more bike paths, crosswalks and sidewalks. It is a significant increase in funding for these projects through the ATP.
 Local Planning Grants: $25 million

11.3.6. California OTS Grants
This program has funding for projects related to traffic safety, including transportation safety education and encouragement activities. Grants applications must be supported by local crash data (such as the data analyzed in this LRSP) and must relate to the following priority program areas:
 Alcohol Impaired Driving
 Distracted Driving
 Drug-Impaired Emergency Medical Services
 Motorcycle Safety
 Occupant Protection
 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
 Police Traffic Services
 Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Program

City of Brentwood LRSP 66 May 2025
 Roadway Safety and Traffic Records

11.3.7. ABAG Regional Funding Programs
ABAG provides funding allocation for various multi-modal transportation projects in the Bay Area.

Projects that are considered for this regional funding program must be eligible for Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Rural Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), or STIP funds.

Performance outcomes which are considered for selection include those which:
 Reduce regional VMT per capita
 Reduce regional congest VMT per capita
 Increase multi-modal or alternative travel choices
 Provide long term benefits, sustaining both rural and urban economies  Improve movement of goods, in and through the region
 Improve safety and security
Maintain and improve upon the existing transportation system

City of Brentwood LRSP 67 May 2025

12. NEXT STEPS
The City has completed this LRSP to guide the process of future transportation safety improvements for years to come. In addition to the actions identified in the Implementation Plan, the City can perform the following to guide the success of this LRSP and its overall safety efforts. • Develop investment program to help achieve the City’s crash reduction goals. • Work with state and partner agencies on implementation of large-scale programs and policies.
• Incorporate safety analysis findings in future updates of safety programs. • Monitor statewide safety priorities, guidance, and funding opportunities.

City of Brentwood LRSP 68 May 2025

APPENDIX A

INTERSECTION NETWORK SCREENING RESULTS

Intersection
Injury Crashes
EPDO*
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case Study Location
Sand Creek Rd and Brentwood Blvd 14 469 0 3 9 2 1 4 3 0 1 0 1 3 1 4 0 9 1 X Lone Tree Way and Shady Willow Ln 12 92 0 0 4 8 5 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 2 1 Balfour Rd and Fairview Ave 12 124 0 0 11 1 5 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 4 1 Sand Creek Rd and Fairview Ave 12 110 0 0 8 4 0 0 6 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 4 0 Sand Creek Rd and O'Hara Ave 12 110 0 0 8 4 1 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 3 2 Balfour Rd and Cortona Way/Eagle Rock Way 10 431 0 3 6 1 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 3 2 X Lone Tree Way and O'Hara Ave 10 431 0 3 6 1 3 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 5 1 4 0 X Sand Creek Rd and Sand Creek Xing 9 83 0 0 6 3 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 Sand Creek Rd and Shady Willow Ln 8 186 0 1 5 2 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 1 Central Blvd and Fairview Ave 8 72 0 0 5 3 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 Lone Tree Way and Canada Valley Rd 7 166 0 1 2 4 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 Central Blvd and Minnesota Ave 7 66 0 0 5 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Balfour Rd and Claremont Dr 7 70 0 0 6 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 Sand Creek Rd and Minnesota Ave 7 285 0 2 3 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 1 0 Brentwood Blvd and 2nd Ave 7 70 0 0 6 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 1 Walnut Blvd and Balfour Rd 7 171 0 1 3 3 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 Brentwood Blvd and Balfour Rd 7 66 0 0 5 2 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 1 2 0 Lone Tree Way and Jeffery Way 6 151 0 1 0 5 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 Balfour Rd and Griffith Ln 6 64 0 0 6 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 Central Blvd and Brentwood Blvd 6 169 0 1 4 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 Lone Tree Way and Heidorn Ranch Rd 5 31 0 0 0 5 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Lone Tree Way and Empire Ave 5 145 0 1 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 Lone Tree Way and Anderson Ln/Adams Ln 5 49 0 0 4 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 Brentwood Blvd and Grant St/Sunset Rd 5 158 1 0 3 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Balfour Rd and John Muir Pkwy 4 34 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 City of Brentwood Crash Summary
Signalized Intersections

Intersection
Injury Crashes
EPDO*
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case Study Location
City of Brentwood Crash Summary
Empire Ave and Shady Willow Ln Signalized Intersections 4 143 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 Lone Tree Way and Fairview Ave 4 38 0 0 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 Central Blvd and Griffith Ln 4 43 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 Lone Tree Way and Brentwood Blvd 4 143 0 1 1 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 Balfour Rd and Hudson Dr 4 34 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Balfour Rd and American Ave 3 28 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 Grant St and Empire Ave 3 32 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 Grant St and Fairview Ave 3 142 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 Central Blvd and 2nd St 3 32 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 Brentwood Blvd and Oak St 3 28 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 Pine St and 2nd St 3 32 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 Balfour Rd and McViking Way 3 28 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Unsignalized Intersections
Balfour Rd and Sellers Ave 11 109 0 0 9 2 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 3 0 Balfour Rd and Garin Pkwy 7 221 0 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 0 Balfour Rd and Armstrong Way 6 55 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 Balfour Rd and Rosegate Ave 5 54 0 0 5 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Brentwood Blvd and E Sims Rd 5 363 0 2 3 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 X Balfour Rd and Guise Way 5 208 0 1 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 Lone Tree Way and Double K Rd 4 198 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 O'Hara Ave and Grant St 4 38 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 Brentwood Blvd and Sunrise Rd 4 43 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Balfour Rd and Heritage High School Driveway 3 342 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 X Lone Tree Way and Windy Spring Ln 3 28 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Neroly Rd and Lavender Way 3 23 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

Intersection
Injury Crashes
EPDO*
Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case Study Location
City of Brentwood Crash Summary
Central Pkwy and Peachwillow Dr Signalized Intersections 3 32 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Dainty Ave and Walnut Blvd 3 23 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Brentwood Blvd and Spruce St 3 178 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 Remington St and Walnut Blvd 3 187 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 Brentwood Blvd and Havenwood Ave 3 28 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Walnut Blvd and McClaren Rd 3 32 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Spruce St and Garin Pkwy 3 28 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 *Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes

City of Brentwood LRSP 69 May 2025

APPENDIX B

SEGMENT NETWORK SCREENING RESULTS

Facility Limits
Injury Crashes
EPDO
2 Fatal
Serious Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
BroadsideSideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Priority Location
O'Hara Ave Sand Creek Rd to Town Center Terrace 5 204 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 Sand Creek Rd Shady Willow Ln to CA-4 Ramps 3 28 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Brentwood Blvd Lone Tree Way to E Sims Rd 4 352 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 X Brentwood Blvd Pine St to Diablo Way 4 43 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 Brentwood Blvd E Sims Rd to Neroly Rd/Delta Rd 4 43 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Minor Arterial
Major Arterial
City of Brentwood Crash Summary

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

City of Brentwood LRSP 70 May 2025

APPENDIX C

PUBLIC COMMENTS

City of Brentwood LRSP May 2025
No. Location Comment Up Votes
1 Adams Ln and Grant St
Cars always block bike lane or ignore crosswalk pedestrians. I’ve witnessed three close calls to kids on bike or walking getting hit by vehicle when they attempt to make a right turn on grant from adams.
0 2 Amber Ln and Salice Way We need to have a safety crosswalk between Salice Way and Amber Lane to allow kids to cross and attend Pioneer Elementary School safely. 0
3 American Ave and Heritage
High School North Driveway
This should be at the top of the list to fix. 0
4 American Ave and Heritage
High School South Driveway
There is only one way in and out of the access road to Adam’s MS and Heritage HS. During drop off and pick up times traffic is really bad. Creating an alternate entrance/exit would be extreme beneficial.
1 5 Anderson Ln North of
Kenwood Dr
After you leave the Brentwood Park there are no side walks or bike lanes as you approach Lone Tree. It very dangerous to walk or ride your bike on Anderson to Brownstone as well. 0 6 Armstrong Way S of Nunn St
People treat armstrong way like their personal drag race strip at all times of day. The noise is a nuisance and obviously safety is a concern as well. Some sort of traffic calming is in order!
0 7 Ascot Pl West of Dover Ct Many car speed thru Brentwood park around each exit/entrance 0 8 Balfour Rd and Brentwood
Blvd
Only one crossing guard and its a 4 way intersection, the guard stays on one corner by Jamba Juice only. I always see cars running lights and on top of that some kids crossing on foot or on bikes don't look and I've seen some close calls. 0 9 Balfour Rd and Tradition Way History of pedestrians hit by cars here. Needs a stop sign 1 10 Brentwood Blvd and Birch St
Children of all ages cross the street here and there is no crosswalk. The city is well aware that kids cross here with no safety measures in place and has done nothing about it. They are going to continue to cross here because it is simply the only route 2 11 Brentwood Blvd and Birch St Seriously need an over the road pedestrian bridge. 0 12 Brentwood Elementary
School
The cross walk to go to Brentwood Elementary school is extremely dangerous during drop off every single morning. Need a cross guard and cops. Everyone always running stop signs and in a rush. Only a matter of time when someone is severely injured. 3 13 Brentwood Elementary
School
I agree, and the people who park at the church and cross there instead of walking to the crosswalk is a problem. I know the principal goes out there to direct traffic, but it is a nightmare for those of us who live in the area and have to drop kids off. 0 14 Brentwood Elementary
School
The area is a big problem. I walked with my kids to school and drive them to school also.

The problems are drivers parking at the side of the street, parking at bike lanes and at the bus stop and leaving their vehicles unattended. Drivers not stopping, r 2