Folsom City Council
March 22, 2022

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions'and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer 0f2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified priot
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Califomia
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, within
suitable tadpole
habrtat.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, within
suitable
northwestern
pond turtle
habitat.
mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all consfiuction personnel to brief them on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the prqect area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation requirements. If new construction personnel are added to the project, the contractor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before itarting work. An environmental awareness handout that describes and illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.

Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey'
The Project Applicant($ shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours ofthe initiation ofconstruction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vernal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) tbr western spadefoot. If no western spadefoot individuals are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. Ifwestem spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures, Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle Survey' The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestem pond turtte survey within 48 hours ofthe initiation of construction activity within suitable habitat for northwestem pond turtle. If no northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biotogist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If northwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity of the proj€ct.
ws-2
(Addendum)
I\WPT-I
(Addendum)
106
-23
106
-24

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
Yes
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

On June 10,2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satrsfied its pre-construchon
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

Califomia
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval
of grading ot
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

During all
construction
phases
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase,
Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey.

The Prqect Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within l4 days prior to commencement of construction dwing the nesting season (1 February through 31 August).

If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualihed biologist in consultation with CDFW, The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent ofthe nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist. Once the young are independent ofthe nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction acfivity outsrde of the nesting season.

Comply with the Programmatic Agreement
The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identi$ing historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those adverse effects as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided,
These steps may be combined with deliverables and management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly reference the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each indivrdual development phase or off-site elemen! the applicable oversight agency (City of Folsom, El Dorado County, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) of all project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
> The project applicant shall retain the services ofa qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identifu locations that are sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of NB.I
(Addendum)
(Addendum)
3A$la
3A"$lb
(Addendum)
106
_t(
106
a6
106
-n

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
known resources, geomorphology, and topography. The inventory report shall specifu the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by consfuction, if appropnate.

The identificatron of any sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction of each individual development phase shall be performed in concert with monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.

For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of "significant" (under CEQA) cultural resources.

These findings shall be reviewed by the applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and treatment measures provided in this EIR/EIS.

Where possible, the prqect shall be configured or redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources. Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place if possible, as suggested under California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance ofhistoric properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800. > Where impacts cannot be avoided, ihe applicable agency or the prqect applicant(s) of all project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measur€s that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist of data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because ofthe data they contain (which may contribute to research). Altematively, for historical architectural, engineered, or landscape feahres, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive, narrative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIRJEIS. > To support the evaluation and treatment required under thrs Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare an appropriate prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate treatrnent.
> These steps and documents may be combined with the phasing ofmanagement and documents prepared pursuant to the FAPA to minimize the potenhal for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesOn June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultahon with the
City, SHPO, the fribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for culhral
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department. Compliance
with this condition is monitored through
construction inspection.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Depaftnent;
U,S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase,
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring If Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.

To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered culhral resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the followrng:
> Before the start of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct fraining for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity ofthe project APE, to educate them about the possibility of encountering buried culhral resources and inform them ofthe proper procedures should culfural resources be encounlered. > As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-lb, if the archaeologist determines that any portion ofthe SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored tbr potential discovery of as-yet-unknown cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with respect to monitoring. > Should any culfural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts ofbone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity ofthe find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and shall assess the significance ofthe find by evaluating the resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. If the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-lb shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved mitigation before resuming constructton activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase wittr the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitrvity training program is developed and implemented during a pre+onstruction meeting for construction supervisors, The sensitivrty training program shall provide information about notification procedwes when potenhal archaeological material is discovered, procedures for coordinafion between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and informatron about otlrcr treatrnent or issues that may arise ifculfural resources (including human remains) are discovered during prqect construchon. This protocol shall be communicated to all new conskuction nersonnel durins orientation and on a noster that is nlaced in a visible locatron inside the 3A"$2
(Addendum)
106
-n

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThere have been no human remarns
discovered during the cowse of grading
and construction in the project.

Sacramento
County
Coroner; Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
During
ground
all
disturbing
activities, for
any project
phase.
consfuctionjob trailer. The phone number ofthe USACE cultural resources staff member shall also be included.

The on*ite sensitivity training shall be canied out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor.

If unanticipated discoveries of additional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800. 16 ([), are made during the construction ofthe project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
> The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authonty to halt consfuction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius of the unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of Attachment G of the HPMP. The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, ifpresent, shall notifu the USACE within 24 hours ofihe discovery. > The USACE shall noti$ the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance with this HPTP.

Once the USACE makes a formal determination of eligibility for the resource, the USACE will notifu the SHPO within 48 hours of the determinatron and afford the SHPO an opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The SHPO shall respond within 72 hours ofthe request to consult, Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the treatment measures.

The prqect applicants shall be requred to submrt to the Crty proof of compliance in the form of a completed tairung roster and copy oftairung materials.

Suspend Ground-DisturbingActivities if Human Remains are Encountered and Complywith California Health and Safety Code Procedures.

In accordance with the Califomia Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground- disturbing activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applican(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area ofthe find and notifr the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature ofthe remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5[b]). if the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the NAHC by phone within24 hours of makrng that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner's findings are complete, the project applicant(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC- designated Most Likely Descendant shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition ofthe remains and take appropriate steDs to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for 3AS3
(Addendun)
r06
:29

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThe owner/applicant has provided
Geotechnical Report to the City. The
Geotechnical report for the subdivision is
on file with the City.

Geolory and Soils
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
of building
permits and
ground-
acting on notification ofa discovery ofNative American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code.

Upon the discovery of Native American remains, the procedures above regarding involvement ofthe applicable county coroner, notification of the NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensure that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and analysis, preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatment. As suggested by AB 2641 (Chapter 863, Statutes of 2006), the concemed parties may extend discussions beyond the irutial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. AB 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or €asement, or record a reinternment document with the county.

The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a locahon not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identifu an Most Likely Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendatron withrn 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy oftraining materials.

Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. Before building permits are issued and construction activities begin any project development phase, the project applicant(s) of each project phase shall hire a licensed geotechnical engineer to prepare a final geotechnical subsurface investigation report for the on- and off+ite facilities, which shall be 3A.7-1a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
-30

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
Compliance with this condition has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

Compliance wlth thls conditron has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
disturbing
activities.

Befbre issuance
of building
permits and
ground-
disturbing
activities.

Before the start
of construction
activities.
submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified betow). The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make recommendations on the following:
site preparation;
soil bearing capacity;
appropriate sources and types of fill;
potential need for soil amendments;
road, pavement, and parking areas,
structural foundations, including retaining-wall design; grading practices,
soil conosion of concrete and steel;
erosion/winterization,
seismic ground shaking;
liquefaction; and
> expansiveiunstablesoils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions, and shall determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the version ofthe CBC that is applicable at the time building and grading permits are applied for. All recommendations contained in the final geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented by the project applicant(s) of each project phase. Special recommendations contained in the geotechnical engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before construction begins. Design and construction of all new project development shall be in accordance with the CBC. The project applicant(s) shall provide for engineenng inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with recommendations contained in the geotechnical report.

Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement of hll, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on both on- and off-site construction areas.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and f,rosion Control Plan. Before grading permits are issued, the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase that would be located within the City ofFolsom shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control olan shall be submitted to the Citv Public Works Deoartment before issuance of eradins 3A.7-lb
(FPASP

EIRIEIS)
347-3 (FPASP
f,IR/EIS)
106
-31
r06
-32

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThe Community Development
Department has reviewed and all
improvement plans in the subdivision to
verifu compliance with mitigation
measure.

Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
earthmoving
activities.
permits for all new development. The plan shall be consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance, the City's Hillside Development Guidelines, and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan, The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills.

The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site+pecific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off+ite detention basin west of Prairie City Road, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a Califorrua Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before issuance ofa grading permit. The plan shall be consistent with Sacramento County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basrn.

The plans referenced above shall include the location, implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description of measures designed to control dust and stabilize the construction-site road and entrance, and a descriptron ofthe location and methods of storage and disposal of construction matenals. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering of stockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion.

Stabilization on steep slopes could include consfiuction of retaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Siabilization of construction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source oftransportation and deposition of excavated materials,
Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-l (discussed in Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land") would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.

Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations, The project applicant($ ofall project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist of perforated pipe and gravel, sunounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months away from building foundations. 3A.7-5 (FPASP
ErR/ErS)
r06
-33

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Greenhouse Gas f,missions and Climate Change
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
During
earthmoving
activities in the
Ione and
Mehrten
Formations.

Before approval
of small-lot
final maps and
building
permits for all
discretionary
development
project,
including all
on- and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required, To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically important paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) of all prqect phases where construction would occur in the ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
> Before the start ofany earthmoving activities for any project phase in the Ione or Mehrten Formations, the project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to train all construction personnel involved with earthmoving activities, including the site supenntendent, regarding the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen dwing construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered. > Ifpaleontological resources are discovered during earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall immediately cease work in the vicinity ofthe find and noti$ the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society ofVertebrate Paleontology guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Implenent Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions, To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particular discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures fbr reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use ofon-site equipment, worker commute trips, and truck trips carrying materials and equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for construction (e.g., concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most cunent list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract with the selected primary contactor. The project applicant($ for any padicular discretionary development aonlication mav submit to the Citv and SMAOMD a renort that substantiates whv snecific measures are 3A.7-10
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)

34.4-l (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
r06
-34
106
-35

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
project
construction.
considered infeasible for construction of that particular development phase and/or at that point in time, The report, including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by the City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction of each development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection of a primary contratrtor, this measure requires that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD's recommended measure s for reducing construction-related GHG emissions at the time of writing this EIR/EIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be requued to implement the following:
> Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
. reduce unnecessary idling (modi$, work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort); . perlbrm equipment maintenance (inspections, detect failures early, conections); . train equipment operators in proper use of equipment, ' use the proper size of equipment for the job; and
r use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains). > Use altemative luels for electricity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use electrical power.
r Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen fNOxl emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.) Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Progam (ARB 2009b)
> Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction worker commutes.
> Reduce electricity use in the construction office by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more efficient ones. > Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and demolition debris (goal ofat least 75% by weight). > Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials (goal ofat least 20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and cwb materials). > Minimize the amount ofconcrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option. > Produce concrete on-site if determined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
The owner/applicant worked with an
organization Urban Wood Rescue which
is a program in association with the
Sacramento Tree Foundation that makes
wood products tiom large trees that are
removed as a result of development. The
owner/applicant provided most of the
large trees that were removed as a part of
the grading and construction for the
project to Urban Wood Rescue and they
made table, fumiture, etc. from the trees
that were provided. The remaining trees
and tree canopy was mulched by the
owner/applicant and is stored on site to
use as mulch in the landscape areas
throughout the project. No removed trees
were transported to the landfill in
accordance with this condition of
approval.

The subdivision is not within any
identified area where contaminated
groundwater is present, Therefore there
is no required Phase I or Phase 2
Environmental Assessment required.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Departmenl
Before approval
of final maps
and/or building
permits for all
project phases
requtnng
discretionary
approval,
including all
on- and off-site
elements.

Befbre and
during earth
movlng
activities
> Use EPA-certified SmartWay trucks for deliveries and equipment transport. Additional information about the SmartWay Transport Partnershp Program is available from ARB's Heary-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).
> Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist of the use of nonpotable water from a local source.

In additron to SMAQMD-recommended measures, construction activity shall comply wrth all applicable mles and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.

Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The trees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all hawestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary iunding for urban and community forestry program (such as the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute [Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensure that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that of all harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., furniture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and fund an off-site tree program that includes a level oftree planting that, at a minimum, increases carbon sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime. This program shall be funded by the project applicant(s) of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an independent Certified Arborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements ofMitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3, "Biological Resources - Land." Final approval ofthe program shall be provided by the City.

Components of the program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the City of Folsom would simultaneously mitigate the loss of oak woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The California Urban Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008) All unused vegetation and tree material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative matenal should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant.

Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments atrd Implement Required Measures. The project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing fbr all areas of the SPA and include, as necessary. analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potential contamination sites 34,.4-2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.E-2 (FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
:36
106
-37

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThere are no overhead powerlines
existing within this subdivision and all
proposed and future utility lines to serve
this subdivision will be placed
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
At the
submission of
tentative map
applications.
that have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 3A.8-1) before construction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substancest > Prepare a ptan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off- site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution ofclean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall include measures that ensure the safe transport, use, and disposal of contaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and treat the contaminated groundwater to remove contaminants before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The project applicant(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws, The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous materials removed from the site at an appropriate off-site disposal facility.
> Notify ttre appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies ifevidence ofpreviously undiscovered soil or groundwater contamination (e.g., starned soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction activities. Any contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County Environmental Management Department, Central Valley RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, siate, or local regulatory agencies. > Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD pertairung to the contents ofany existing pole- mounted transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall determine whether existing on-site elechical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is identified, the maintenance and/or disposal of the transformer shall be subject to the regulations of the Toxic Substances Conhol Act under the authority of the Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applican(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure. Potential purchasers of residenfial properties near the transmission lines shall be made aware of the controversy sunounding EMF exposure. The California Department of Real Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant's final Subdivision Public Report application, which shall be provided to purchasers of properties within 100 feet from the 100-1 15kV oower line " or within 150 feet from the 220-230 kV power line . The notification would 3A.8-6 (TPASP
f,rR/EIS)
106
-38

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
under$ound in accordance with the
subdivision's conditions of approval.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
of grading
permits tbr the
project water
features.
include a discussion ofthe scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where background levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

Prepare and Implement a Vctor Control Plan in Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District, To ensure that operation and design ofthe stormwater syster\ includrng multiple planned detention basins, is consistent wth the recommendatrons ofthe Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control Distlict regarding mosquito control, the prqect applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Vector Control Plan, This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the City for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the detention basins rmder the City's jurisdictron. For the off-site detention basiq the plan shall be submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Conhol District BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008). The plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following components:
> Description ofthe project.
> Description ofdetention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
> Goals ofthe plan.
> Description ofthe water management elements and features that would be implemented, including:
. BMPs that would implemented on-site;
. public education and awareness;
. sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
r mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
. stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater Management Plan), > Long-term maintenance ofthe detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable conditions or maintenance by a homeowner's association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identifu and implement BMPs based on their potential effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could include, but are not limited to, the following:
> build shoreline penmeters as steep and uniform as practicable to discourage dense plant growth; 3A.8-7 (I?ASP
ErRixrs)
106
-39

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB
Hydrology and Water Quality
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Submlttal of the
State
Construction
General Permit
NOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development
and submittal of
any other
locally required
plans and
specifications
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all on-site
project phases
and off-site
elements and
> perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant densities to facilitate the ability ofmosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move thoughout vegetated area; > design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water. The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling; > coordinate cleaning ofcatch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito heatment operations; > enforce the prompt removal of silt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water quality;
> if the sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception of the inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area of water for mosquito egg- laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipes); and
> design struchres with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy dewatering ofthe unit if necessary (Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant(s) ofthe project phase containing the off-site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County).

Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant(s) of all projects disturbing one or more acres (including phased construction of smaller areas which are part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage under the SWRCB's NPDES stormwater permit for general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ), including preparation and submittal of a project-specific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) shall also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City of Folsom, El Dorado County (for the off+ite roadways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Alternatrve). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identifu and specify:
> the use ofan effective combination ofrobust erosion and sediment confrol BMPs and construction techniques accepted by the local jurisdictions for use in the project area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoff and the release, mobilizalion, and exposure of pollutants, including legacy sources of mercury from projeclrelated construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences > the implementation ofapproved local plans, non-stormwater management controls, permanent post- construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities; 3A.9-l (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
r06
-40

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThe Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from ttre State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB) The NDES Permit
City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

Before approval
of grading plans
and building
> the pollutants that are likely to be used dwing construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other types ofmaterials used for equipment operation;
> spill prevention and contrngency measures, including measures to prevent or clean up spills ofhazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
> personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP; and > the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation ofthe SWPPP. > Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and construction/demolition activitres and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as those listed below. > Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of construction. These measures may include silt fences, staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation. > Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas dishrbed by construction by slowing runoff velocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and transpiration. > Using drainage swales, ditches, and eafih dikes to control erosion and runoffby conveying surface runoff down sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoff to a watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and facility infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be marntarned and available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Caltrans shall coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado andior Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements Contained in Those Plans, Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills. demonstratine that off-site upstream runotl would be appropriately conveyed through the SPA, 3A.9-2 (FPASP
f,rwEIs)
106
-41

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
lSWPPP;, which outlines monitonng
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.
permits of all
project phases.
and that project-related on*ite runoff would be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfication impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
> an accurate calculation ofpre-project and post-project runoffscenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
> runoffcalculations for the 1O-year and 100-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and detention facility locations finalized in the design phase; > a description ofthe proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system; > project-specific standards for installing drainage systems; > City and El Dorado County flood control design requirements and measures designed to comply with them;
Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specitic range of conditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain current stream geomorphology.

These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> use of Low lmpact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoff at the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept stormwater);
> enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics; > bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bark erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for enhancement ofriparian habitat and maintenance of natural hydrologic and channel to floodplarn interactions; > minimize slope differences between any stormwater or detention facility outfall channel with the existing receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and > minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankmeni, and other encroachments into the channel and floodplain conidor, and utilize open bottom box culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado Coun8 Department ofTransportation that 100-year (0.01

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yeshas received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP's,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has prepared storm
drain design reports and provided storm
drain calculations for all of the proposed
storm drainage features and
detention/water quality and
hydromodification basins necessary to
serve this subdivision. These reports
have been reviewed and approved by the
Commuruty Development and Public
Works Departments.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Public Works
Department
Prepare plans
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all project
phases and off-
site elements
and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

AEP) flood flows would be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures within or down gradient of the SPA would not occur, and that hydromodification would not be would be changed (theincreased from pre-development levels such range of conditions should be calculated for
that existing stream geomorphology
each receiving water if feasible, or a conservative estimate of I +10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Qualityshould be used, e,g., an Partnership and/or City
Ep
of Folsom Public Works Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County shall include the elements described below.
> A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis of proposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage desi gn features.
> Predevelopment and post devetopment calculations demonstrating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the "'Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Placer Regions" ([SSQP 2007b] per NPDES Permit No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0142, page 46) and El Dorado County's NPDES SWMP (County of El Dorado 2004).
> Source control programs to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization, prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management of public trash collectron areas.
> A pond management component for the proposed basins that shall include management and maintenance requirements for the design features and BMPs, and responsible parties for maintenance and funding. > LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but are not limited to:
. surface swales,
. replacementofconventionalimpervioussurfaceswithpervioussurfaces(e.g.,porouspavement); . impervious surfaces disconnection; and
3A.9-3 (I?ASP
f,rR/f,IS)
106
-42

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
There are no existing or proposed dams
upstream from this subdivision and
therefore there is no requirement to
perform the analysis required in this
condition of approval.

The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practic'es
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construction inspection.

Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Noise and Vibration
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Departrnent
Prior to
submittal to the
City oftentative
maps or
improvement
plans.

Before and
during
construction
activities on the
SPA and within
El Dorado
Hills.
. trees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be placed along the natural drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage pattems. The reduction in runoff as a result of the LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoffreduction credit system methodology described in "Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4" (SSQP 2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoff volumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part ofthe U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans.

Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream of the Project Site and Make Improvements if Necessary. Prior to submrttal to the City of tentative maps or improvement plans the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall perform conduct studies to determine the extent of inundation in the case of dam failure. If the studies determine potential exposure of people or structures to a significant risk of flooding as a result of the failure of a dam, the applicants(s) shall implement of any feasible recommendations provided in that study, potentially through drainage improvements, subject to the approval of the City of Folsom Public Works Department.

Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors. To reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the prqect applicant(s) and their primary contractors for engineering design and construction of all project phases shall ensure that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year of project construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
> Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.

Monday ttrough Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. > All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-sensitive land uses.
3A.9-4 (FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.ll-l
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-43
106
-44

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesBlasting has been necessary tkoughout
the course of grading and construction in
this subdivision, The blasting has not
been within 2000 feet of any sensitive
receDtor, The blastine contractor has
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and
during
bulldozing and
blasting
activities on the
All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction exhaust mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with manufacfurers' recommendations. intake and
Equipment
engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.

A1l motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling.

Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g, using weldrng instead ofriveting, mixing concrete offsite instead ofon-site).

Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and generators) as planned phases are built out and fufure noise sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to future construction activities.

Written notification ofconstruction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet of construction activities. Notification shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction activities are anticipated to occur and contact information, including a daytime telephone number, for the project representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification, To the extent feasible, acoustic baniers (e,g., lead curtains, sound barriers) shall be constructed to reduce construction-generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses. The barriers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site construchon equipment.

When installed properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by approximately 8-10 dB (EPA 1971).

When futgre noise sensitive uses are within close proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise- attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be located betrveen noise sources and tuture residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise.

The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a construction noise management plan. This plan shall identiS specific measures to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above.

The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the construction noise management plan is approved by the City of Folsom. Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of the applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside ofthe City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries.

Implement Measures to Prevent f,xposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
> To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted within 275 feet ofexisting or future sensitive receptors.
3A.11-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-45

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
obtained a blasting permit from the City
and the Community Development
Department has verified compliance with
the permit through construction
inspection.

The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part ofthe required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construction inspection.

There are no sensitive receptors within
600 feet of any on-going construction
and grading activig in the subdivrsion.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
SPA and within
El Dorado Hills
and the County
of Sacramento
Before
submittal of
improvement
plans for each
project phase,
and during
project
operations for
testing of
emergency
generators.
> To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet ofexisting or fufixe sensitive receptors.
> All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of Califomia.
> A blasting plan, including estimates ofvibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement of the first blast.
> Each blast shall be monitored and documented for groundboume noise and vibration levels at the nearest sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project4enerated Stationary Sources' The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following measures to reduce the effect of noise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:
> Routine testing and preventive maintenance ofemergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitrve daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p,m,). All electrical generators shall be equipped with noise conhol (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers' specifications. > External mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate features designedto reduce noise emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustrcal louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment enclosures shall be oriented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby noise- sensitive receptors.
> Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emrssions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i,e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to l0 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of parking lot noise can be achieved by locating parkrng lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.
> Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a,m, to 10 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.l), Reduction of loading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as oossible from noise sensitive land uses. constructing noise baniers behveen loading docks and noise' 3A-Il-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-46

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
aCofOin
the
appropriate
phase of
developme
nt ofthe
project.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
aCofOin
the
appropriate
phase of
developme
nt of the
project.

The landscape and streetscape plans for
the subdivision include the required
masonry walls in the required height and
required locations. The Community
Development Department will monitor
compliance during construction and
verifu that the sound walls are complete
prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy in the subdivision.

The Community Development
Department will monitor compliance
during construction and veriff that the
sound walls are complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in
the subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
building
0ccupancy
Prior to
building
occupancy
sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topo$aphic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise- sensitive land uses.

Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise barriers, as detailed below, to reduce traffic noise levels below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of60 dB Ldn. > 6-foot tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway. > For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion ofthe project, a 7-foot tall solid noise banier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road. > For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase 1 and Phase 2 portions ofthe project, an 8-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the tratTic noise baniers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall banier height may be achieved by utilizing a banier and earthen berm combination. Other matenals may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use.

Barrier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of 1 17-122 feet from the ultimate alignment ofWhite Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White Rock Road improvements are funded and moving forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project appticant shall obtain the services of a noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual prop6rty boundary setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measures to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City ofFolsom noise standards.

Interior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been implemented.
> For the first-row ofhomes located along White Rock Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor building facades shall maintain minimum window assembly STC ratings of 34. > Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

4.13-l
(Addendum)

4.13-2
(Addendum)
106
-47
106
-4E

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and
approved all traflic control plans
required for the construction ofboth
off-site and on-site improvements
for this subdivision to verifu
compliance with City ordinances and
to minimize delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site elements outside
the City limits for this subdivision.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifr adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Public Services
City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the
approval of all
relevant plans
and/or permits
and during
construction of
atl project
phases.

Before issuance
of building
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

Prepare and Implement a Construction TraIIic Control Plan. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic control plans must follow any applicable standards ofthe agency responsible for the affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising of planned lane closwes, waming signage, a flag person to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by emergency vehicles. During project construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval of all project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applican(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties and Caltrans).

Incorporate California Fire Code; City ofFolsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFI) Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval. To reduce impacts related to the provision of new fire services, the project applicant($ of all project phases shall do the following, as described below. l. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City ofFolsom Fire Department fire prevention standards, Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic sprinkler systems, the availability ofadequate fire flow, and the locations of hydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section i7.57.080 ("Vehicular Access Requirements"). These plans shall describe access-road lengh, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and barricades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Baniers Standard, as required by the City ofFolsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for review and approval before the issuance of building permits.

In addition to the above measwes, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall incorporate the provisions described below for the portion ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area, if it is determined through CitylEl Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 1 78-acre portion of the SPA, 3A.1+1
(FPASP
ErR/XrS)

34.1+2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-49
106
-50

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verifu adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Thrs subdivision pay of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrashucture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance
of building
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
imolemented
submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklers shall submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a Calitbrnia State Licensed C-16 Contractor.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy of any structures until the project applicant(s) have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Department verifuing that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction of the City ofFolsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre area ofthe SPA within the EDHFD service area.

Fire Flow Requirements into
shall incorporate into their prqect designs
for those areas
fire flow California Fire Code, Folsom
Fire Code, and/or EDHFD of the SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verifu to City of Folsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance of occupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases.
the f,'olsom
(Intersection l). To Boulevard/Blue
Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must The applicant
be reconfigured to
consist oftwo left-tum lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. shall pay lts other appropriateproportionate share of funding of improvements, and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to
Road intersection (lntersection l).
as may be determined by a nexus study or
reduce the impacts to the Folsom BoulevardBlue Ravine
3A.t+3
(FPASP
ErR/XrS)
3A.15-ta
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-51
106
-52

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Conditron
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements wth the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
The Applicant Shall Pay a tr'air Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements at the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 2),
The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Scott Road (West)/Whife Rock Road Intersection (Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West),Ailhite Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal must be installed.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Intersection 41). To ensure that the Hillside DriveiEaston Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane and two through lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two through lanes and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements, 3A.15-lb
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

34.15-lc
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-le
oPASP
ErR/f,IS)
106
-53
r06
-54
106
-55

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traflic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department and
Caltrans
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented,
A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

Before project
build out.

Design of the
White Rock
Road widening
to four lanes,
from Grant Line
Road to Prairie
City Road, with
Intersection
F'und and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/lvliddle Road Intersection (Intersection 44), To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway,Middle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2). To ensure that the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including 'Jug handle" ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. 50/Hazel Avenue interchange is a mitigation measure tbr the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoadAMhite Rock Road Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Intersection 3). Improvements must be made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The cunently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build altematives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line).

This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road to be the through movement, The improvements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane two northhound left tum lanes- two northbound risht tum lanes. two westbound left turn lanes and 3A.15-lf
(FPASP
f,IR/EIS)

34.t5-th
(FPASP
ErR/XrS)
3A.15-li
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
-56
106
-57
106
-58

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permrt issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
improvements
has begun, and
because this
widening
project is
environmentally
cleared and
fully funded,
it's construction
is expected to
be complete
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Prqect or
altemative is
built.

Belbre project
build out.

Construction of
phase two of
the Hazel
Avenue
widening, from
Madison
Avenue to
Cunagh Downs
Drive, is
expected to be
completed by
yeu 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
complete. The
aoolicant shall
two westbound through lanes. This improvement also includes the signalizatron ofthe White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road,4Vhite Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment l0). To ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS between Cunagh Downs Dnve and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part ofthe County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.
3A.rs-lj
(TPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-59

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Conditron
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit in
the
subdivision
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building pernut issuance in this
subdivision.

El Dorado
County
Department of
Transportation
pay its
proportionate
share of funding
of
improvements
to the agency
responsible fbr
improvements,
based on a
pr0$am
established by
that agency to
reduce the
impacts to
Hazel Avenue
between
Madison
Avenue and
Cunagh Downs
Drive
(Sacramento
County
Roadway
Segment l0).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Irnprovements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock RoarVWindfield Way Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3), To ensure that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized and separate northbound left and right tum lanes must be striped. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).
3A.15-1r
(FPASP
f,rRlEIS)
106
-60

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision witl pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and the City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
Caltrans
lmprovement
should be built.

Before prqect
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U,S. 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/U .S. 50 Eastbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersechon 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an alternate must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel U.S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end ofthis parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they
route. It is preferred to alleviate the congestion on
reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Foliom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east of Folsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U. S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project Measure A funding,
Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l). To ensure ihat Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a buscarpool (HOV) lane must be constructed, This improvement is cunently planned as part ofthe Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and Community Enhancements Project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of imorovements to the asencv responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to 3A.15-1o
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.15-1p
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
3A.15-tq
(F',PASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
-61
106
-62
106
-63

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
a building
permit.

Condrtron
will be
satistled
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issrnnce of
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Coun8 Wide
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
Community
Enhancements
Project is
expected to be
completed by
yew 2013,
before the first
phase ofthe
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
complete.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project has
started since the
witing of the
DraftEIS/EIR.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
reduce the impacts to Eastbound U, S 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U,S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U,S. 50 Auxiliarv Lane Proiect. This imorovement is included in the oroposed 50 Conidor Mobilitv Fee Proeram. 3A.15-lr
oPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-ls
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
r06
-64
106
-65

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satist'ied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Developrirent
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
and Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
prqect phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Befbre project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and f,'olsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16)' To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible lbr improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U. S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18).
3A.15-lu
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-lv
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
106
-66
106
-67

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transnortation fees collected orior to
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Departrnent of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
Drior to
Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U,S.50 f,astbound/Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (f,'reeway Merge 4), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report tbr the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 EastboundlFolsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 f,astbound/Prairie City Road Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off-ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed, This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the imparts to the U.S, 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be (FPASP
3A.15-lw
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-lx
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-ly
(FPASP
[rR/Ers)
106
-68
106
-69
106
-70

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
a
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision,
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
determineO by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Partrcrpate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie Cify Road tr'lyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parlway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions, Such an improvement may involve a "braided ramp".

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave (Freeway Weave 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applican! to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9).

34.15-lz
(FPASP
ErRiErs)
3A.15-1aa
(FPASP
ErRiErs)
106
-71
106
-72

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructrue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Thrs subdrvrsron wrll pay rts tarr share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transnortation fees collected orior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
Countv
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build oul A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
nrior to
Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S,50 WestboundlEmpire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U. S, 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road otT ramp. The slip on ramp tiom soulhbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge29), Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32), To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be 3A.15-ldd
(F',PASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-lee
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-1ff
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-73
106
-74
106
-75

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements wrth the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prolect
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Metge 32).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33), To ensure that Westbound U.S, 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This aunliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 33).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34), To ensure that Westbound U.S, 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shalt pay its proportionate share of frnding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexls study or other appropnate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound i Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).
3A.15-lgg
(I"ASP
ErR/f,rs)
3A"15-lhh
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-76
106
-77

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
dre following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traflic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
buitding permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Departrnent of
Transportation
and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Departrnent of
Public Works
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before approval
of improvement
plans for all
project phases
any particular
discretronary
development
application that
includes
residential and
commercial or
mixed-use
development.

As a condition
of project
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
asreement for
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 WestboundAlazel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (tr'reeway Merge 38), To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard off ramp diverge must be conshucted. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concunent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Options for Alternative Transportation Modes, The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop commercial and mrxed-use development concunent with housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to intemalize vehicle trips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To further minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume of single-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent oftravel by transit. The project's fair-share participation and the associated trming of the improvements and service shall be identified in the project conditions ofapproval and/or the project's development agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT. 3A.15-tii
(FPASP
EIRiEIS)
3A.15-2a
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)
106
-78
106
-79

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a burlding
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay tts tair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPiF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Departrnent
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
all project
phases.

Concurrent with
construction for
all project
phases.

Concurrent with
construction for
all project
phases.

As a condrtron
of project
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program, The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the City's existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application shall join and participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Pay Full Cost of Identilied Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program. In accordance with Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because ofthe Specific Plan.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersecfion (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravtne Road intersectron operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No hoject delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated nght-tum lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of hmding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mecharusm paid for by applican! to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street{Blue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). 3A.15-2b
(FPASP
ErR/XrS)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP
ErwErs)

34.15-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-80
106
-81
106
-82
106
-83

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchue
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
during which
prqect phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
dunng which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
t'irst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 6). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, four tfuough lanes and a right-turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconftgured to consist oftwo left tum lanes, four through lanes, and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7), To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one left-through lane, and two dedicated right-tum lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell Street/Nesmith Court intersechon (Folsom Intersection 7). 3A.15-4b
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
106
-E4
106
-85

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condrtron
will be
satisfled
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrashucture
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permrt issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fatr share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Fotsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements t0 the f,ast Bidwell Streetflron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2l), To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /lron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a nght-tum lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane. It is agarnst the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, thrs improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23), To improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist of one left-turn lane, one shared left-through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/lron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch Road/lron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 24). To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all of the following improvements are required:

The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a right- turn lane. The westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-tum lanes, one through lane, and a tlrough-right lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lanes, three through lanes, and a righ!fum lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of

34.15-4d
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4e
(FPASP
EIRiEIS)
3A.15-4f
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)
106
-86
106
-87
106
-88

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traftic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivrsion will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval ofthe first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements,
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoadAilhite Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type of grade separated intersection or interchange, Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County's Proposed General Plan. Implementation ofthese improvements would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line RoadAVhite Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).
3A.15-4g
(F',PASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4i
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
t06
-89
106
-90

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specif-ic Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Thrs subdrvision will pay its larr share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes, This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Lnprovements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highway, this roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in F'air Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S, 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

To improve operation on Hazel Avenue between Cunagh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50 westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento County's general plan because the county's policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes.

Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A. l54q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and, therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall 3A.1s-4j
OPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4k
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)
3A.15-4t
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-91
106
-92
106
-93

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision wilt pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation,
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation,
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Participate in Fair Share F'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22)' To improve operation on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because of other development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segnent 2E)' To improve operation on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).
3A.15-4m
(FPASP
f,IR/f,IS)
3A.15-4n
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
-94
106
-95

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Intiastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation,
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County l). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right. Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County i).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Inprovements to Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U,S, 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection l). To ensure that the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane, one shared left through lane and three dedicated right-turn lanes.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1 ).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of knprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030.

Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffrc from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency 3A"15-4o
(FPASP
f,rR/f,rs)
3A.15-4p
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)

34.15-4q
(FPASP

ETRIEIS)
106
-96
r06
-97
106
-98

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
pflor to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
for
Eastbound U.S.
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in tr'air Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Conidor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic offofU.S, 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share f,'unding of hnprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4t). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Conidor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030, Construction ofthe Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of t'unding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). 3A.15-4r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4s
(FPASP
ErRrErs)
106
-99
I06
100

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satistied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
paymenl of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation,
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
dunng which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceplable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the northbound Prairie City noaa slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures 3A.15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6), To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A. I 54u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway offramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on the U'S, 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7)' To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A. I 5-4u, v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full aunliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus 3A.15-4r
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
101
106
102
t42
103

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condrtron
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements wrth the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation,
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U. S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7)
Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 f,astbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street- Scott Road off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound i Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in tr'air Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Inpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge2T).
3A.15-4w
oPASP
f,IR/ErS)
3A.15-4x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
104
106
I05

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satist'ied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This condition will be satisfied prior to
issuance ofthe 546n building permrt in
the Phase 2 portion ofthe Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch Regency project in
accordance with previous conditions of
approval The Phase 1 portion ofthe
Regency project consists of 545 dwelling
units, The VTSM for the Phase 2 portion
of the Regency project has not yet been
approved by the City Council,
The Capital Southeast Connector -JPA
has executed a construction contract with
Goodfellow Brothers, Inc. to construct
the Capital Southeast Connector from
Prairie City Road to East Bidwell Street.

The construction contract was executed
in December of 2020. Grading and
construction commenced in Apnl 2021.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

City of Folsom
Commuruty
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map t0
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 3$. To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard offramp, The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improv€ments, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35), East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6). Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the prqect applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figwe 4-2 of the Addendum:
> Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; > Southbound: one thru lane and one right tum lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; > Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-tums from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and > Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project's resnonsibilitv to the Sacramento Countv Transnortation Develonment Fee. The nroiect annlicant is 3A.15-4y
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)

4.17-l
(Addendum)

4.t7-2
(Addendum)
106
106
106
t07
106
108

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Occupancy
in the
subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Yes
The project will include the relocation
and signalization of the existing Whtte
Rock Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The owner/applicant will
pay the Sacramento County
Transportation Development Fee prior to
issuance of all building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the improvement plans tbr the
construction of these required
improvements includtng the plans for the
modification to the existing traffic signal
at the intersection of East Bidwell Street
and Mangim Parkway. These
improvements are currently under
construction.

The required improvements in thts
condition have been completed and
accepted by the City. These
improvements were constructed as part
ofthe off-site improvements for the
Mangini Ranch Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements,
with the
exception of the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 2
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improve ments
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
orior to
to pay
once the JPA has let contracts for conshuction
can
of the new intersection. This will insure
or more seconds of delay to the
Development Fee to
be
that the mitigation consfructed before project traffic adds fiveis intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street{Vhite Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry Figure 44 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation. -EastBidwe[street/ManginiParkwry.PriortobuildoutoftheTollBrothersSite,theprojectapplicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-5 of the Addendum):
> Northbound; One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right- turn lane in a I 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second tlru lane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);
> Southbound: One left-tum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one nght- turn lane in a 1 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot tapet;
> Eastbound and westbound: One lefttum lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one righlturn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.

East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry Gigure 4'6 of the Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared tlrough'right lane with a 150-foot taper; > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one tluough lane; > Westbound approach: One left tum lane in a 60-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane; 4-17-3
(Addendum)

4.17-4
(Addendum)
106
109
106
110

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permlt rn
the
subdivision
The Community Development
Department has approved the plans for
the reconstruction and signalization of
the East Bidwell StreeVAlder Creek
Parkway intersection in accordance with
this condition.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Construct all
geomefic
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
and one thru
southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
and the second
thru southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.
> Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part ofthe entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the fuhre.
f,ast Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkrray. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project apphcant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 of the Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-tum lane in a I 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right tum lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper. > Southbound approach: One left tum lane in a 240-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes.

The second southbound through lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way. > Westbound approach: One right tum lane, plus one left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions of approval from neighboring projects.

4.17-5
(Addendum)
106
t.t 1

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
Phase 3
subdivision
Yes
Yes
The Capital Southeast Connector-JPA
project is cunently under conshuction.

The Connector project will implement
and complete Option A in this condition.

The owner/applicant shall implement the
required improvements to the
intersection in compliance with this
condition prior to issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy in the Phase 3
(Traditional Subdivision) portion of the
project.

The Phase I Sanitary Sewer
infrastructure including the off+ite
sewer trunk main, the Alder Creek
Parkway sewer lift station and forced
main 1o serve this subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA landowners and
have been completed and accepted by
the City and are cunently in operation.

The City obtained a lefter from Regional
San which provides verification that
there is adequate capacity in the ensting
Regional San conveyance and treatment
system to accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at buildout,
Confirmation from Regional San was
required because the Folsom Plan Area
is served bv the eistins Resional San
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Utilities and Service Systems
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Departmenl and
City of Folsom
EWR
D€partment
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits tbr any
project phases.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate anticipated U-Tums. Expand or construct a signalized intersection as follows;
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right turns. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a left{J-tum in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Westbound: A ttru lane and a righfturn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U-hrns. > Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound right tum requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 of the Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and Off-Site Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all prqect phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proofto the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured through payment ofthe City's facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40, "Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrashuchre and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction ofthe City.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity, The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connechon and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.

4.11-6
(Addendum)
3A.16-l
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.16-3
(FPASP
ErR/XIS)
106
tt2
106
113
106
lt4

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Lift Station on Iron Point Road. The City
Sewer Lift Station and Forced Main
which connects to the Regional San Lift
Station has been accepted by the City
and is cunently in operation,
The owner/applicant has constructed the
necessary infrastructure to provide
potable water to the subdivision. The
potable Phase I water infrastructure for
the Folsom Plan Area has been reviewed,
approved and accepted by the City and is
cunently in operation.

The off-site potable water infrastructure
to serve the subdivision has been
reviewed, approved and accepted by the
City and is cunently in operation. In
addition, the City has verified that the
off+ite potable water infrastructure is
adequate to serve the subdivision.

This condition is not applicable to this
subdivision. The water supply for this
subdivision is provided by the City of
Folsom Water Treatment Plant rather
than an Off-Site Water Treatment Plant
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City ofFolsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability, a Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of any smallJot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential prqect not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) of that project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applican($ of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proofto the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction ofthe City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatrnent Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected), If an off-site water treatm€nt plant (WTP) altemative is selected (as opposed to the on- site WTP altemative), the project applican(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP, This shall involve prepanng a tentative maplevel study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval of the final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all protect phases. A certificate of occupancy shall not be 3A.18-1
(FPASP
ErwErs)
3A.I8-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)

34.18-2b
(FPASP
f,rR/Ers)
106
115
106
l16
106
tt7

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
approval of
a future
TMP,
The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need ibr the TMP and make '
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City.

Additional Measures
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval of first
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

Highway 50.
issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce f,xposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input ofthe City ofFolsom, the City ofRancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements fbr the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quanies with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jwisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City of Folsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quarries, has indicated that it intends to pr€pare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a fuhue TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction ofthe City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIRVFEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jwisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, ibrmulation of the precise means of mitigating ttre potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the Crty shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than 296 in one million (SMAOMD 2009.

Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure AIR-
1-Land
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
r06
118

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

March. Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version 2.2:7), or such different tbreshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any. With thrs mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air coniaminants would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identrfied above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet wrth the City of Folsom to dhcuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health Rrsk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitrve receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. Each project- level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of disclosure to the pubtic and decision makers. The project-level analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel trucks), and emission rates representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk determined by in the HM exceeds296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
. Implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the dispersion and filtration of mobile-source TACs associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the trees reach mahritv, which breaks the line of sight

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
approval of
a future
TMP.

The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction ofthe
City
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval of first
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

50. between U. S. 50 and the proposed homes. These trees should be planted before occupation of any affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe construction of potentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of these trees should be maintained ttrough the duration of the quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry prqect applicant(s).
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
. equip all affected residences and school buildings developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle Anesting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air iniake points to the interior rooms; . use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from roadway air pollution sources as possible; and . develop and implement an ongoing education and maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic. The Ctty of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 20 10, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development a$eement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility oftruck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the SPA and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion ofthe County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption ofa TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrichons or other actions- such as the annroval and imolementation of snecialized road imorovements to accommodate Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISf,-l-Land
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
119

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregotng reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 1538 I ), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activitie s on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City.

In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIBVFEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation ofthe precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions ofthe TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily imptemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for sensitive receptors to noise generated by quurry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of 3 dBA over existing conditions, as ideniified above.

The City encourages implementation ofthe following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City ofFolsom to discuss mitigation sfrategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site+pecific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City ofFolsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that are identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted using an approved th'ree dimensional traffic noise modeling program (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each project- tevel analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City of Folsom for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project-level analysis should account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the vear 2030 (including the percentage ofheaw trucks), Ifthe incremental

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

The FPA landowners have satrsfied all of
the mitigation measures for the design
and construction ofthe Phase 1 Water
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by the City of Folsom, then desrgn mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
> Model the benefits of soundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected receptors not to exceed a total height of eight feet (two-foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this mitigation measure is determined by the Crty of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion ofrubberized asphalt at the expense of the quarry truck applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigatron has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s). > Implement the installation ofrubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive receptors that carry quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of traffic noise levels. The inclusion of rubberized asphalt would provide an additional 3 to 5 dB of traffic noise reduction, The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by the quarry truck applicant(s). Sard mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project applican(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
> To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools:
. Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed construction plans of residences adjacent to affected roadways are avarlable to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks. r Determine the interior quarry truck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along aff'ected roadways. Quarry truck applicant(s) should pay for the cost of window package upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated windows) required to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quany truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be pard for by the quany project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off-Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructure and off-site water facility alternative improvements. The project applicant shall N/A106
120

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
and Sewer Backbone Infrastructure to
serve the first of development in the
FPA. The Phase 1 backbone
Infrastrucfure was completed and
accepted by the City in 20 I 8 and is
currently in use in the FPA and being
owned and operated by the City. The off-
site water facility altemative
improvements were not implemented.

The water for the FPA was provided
tluough the conservation of existing
water in the City. The new water supply
alternative was validated in 2014.

Department and
City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
building
permits for any
project phase,
the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to
the City's
satisfaction the
fair share
contribution
towards
implementation
of Backbone
Infrastructure
and Off-Site
Water Facility
improvements
and associated
required
mitigation as
identified in the
Folson South of
U.S. Highway
50 Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated
Negative
Declaration
(December
2014) or the
Revised
Proposed Of-
Site W'ater
Facility
Alternative
Addendum to
the FPASP

EIR/EIS
coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Folsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014):
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-l: Design above gound pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-1: Prepare and Implement NOX Reduction Plan > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2: Pay Off+ite Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissrons Generated by Construction.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, ifnecessary, Prepare and Implement aa Asbestos Dust Control Plan. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l: Conduct Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western Spadefoot Toad > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond Turtle > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's Hawk Nesting Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foraging Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored Blackbird > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8: Nesting Raptors > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-|0: Special-Status Bats > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l3: Conduct Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section 401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, OtherWaters of the U.S., and Waters of the State

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
(approved
December
2012); as
applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-I5: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l l: American Badger > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property heatment plans > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Sigruficance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required,
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3; Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with Califomia Health and Safety Code Procedures. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-l: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monilor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitrgation Measure VI-5(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan for the detention basin West of Prarne City Road. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VII-I: Greenhouse Gas Emissions > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVi-l: Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-3: North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure Vl4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-I North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measwes detarled in the Revised Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative Addendun to the FPASP EIPJEIS (approved December 11, 2012):
> 3B.l-2a. Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural Facilities.

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
> 38,1-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 3B.1-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 38.1-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
> 3B.2-1a: Develop and Implement a Construction NOX Reduction Plan, > 3B.2-1c: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during Construction.
> 3B.2-3a:. Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors. > 38.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and Implement Measwes to Reduce Annual DPM to Acceptable Concentrations.
> 38.4-1a: Implement GHG Reduction Measures dunng Construction. > 3B.4-lb Prepare and Implement an Off+ite Water Facilities Climate Action Plan. > 3A.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 3A.5-lb: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation ofCultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Mirumize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring ifRequtred, Stop Work ifCultLral Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> 3A.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with Califorma Health and Safety Code Procedures,
> 38.7-la. Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off+ite Water Facilities and Implement Required Measures.
> 38.7-1b: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency Measures Into Final Pipeline Design. > 3B..7-4: Implement Conosion Protection Measures.
> 3B..7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work ifPaleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
> 3B.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 3B.8-1b: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials Management Plan. > 38.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThe Capital Southeast Connector - JPA
project commenced construction in April
2021. Since the project has commenced
with construction this condition has been
satisfied,
cD (E)M
> 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 3B.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible Materials. > 38.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. > 3B.9-la: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. > 3B.9-lb: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. > 38.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for Structural Facilities. > 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment. > 38.ll-la: LimitConstructionHours.
> 38, I I -lb: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging. > 38.11-lc: Maximize the Use ofNoise Baniers.
> 38 1 l-ld: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction. > 38.1 l-le: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints. > 38,I 1-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization Measures. > 38,12-1: Provide for Continued Recreational Access as Identified in Mitigation Measure 3. l4-la. > 38.15-la: Prepare Traffic Control Plan.
> 38.15-1b: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions. > 38,16-3a, Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert, > 38.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
> 38,17-1al Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practices. > 38 l7-lb: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program. > 3A. l8-1 : Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. > 3A. l8-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. ll/hile Rock Road Shoalder Imptovements
The owner/applicant shall construct shoulder improvements along the project's entire frontage of westbormd White Rock Road to the satisfaction of the City prior to approval of the first small lot final map. In lieu of constructing the aforementioned interim shoulder improvements, the owner/applicant may enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and post

20.

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

YesThis condition will apply to the future
Phase 3 (Traditional Subdivision) and
therefore does not apply to the Phase lD
subdivision.
cD (E) (P)
cD (E) (P)
M
M
adequate security to the City's satisfaction to ensure construction of said improvements; the security shall be for a minimum period of l0 years.

If shoulder improvements are consffucted and/or funded by the owner/applicant, then said costs may be included in any applicable fee program established and approved for the Folsom Plan Area subject to approval by the City and the actual costs expended by the owner/applicant may therefore be eligible for a credit and/or reimbursement.

Ifconstruction ofthe Capital Southeast Connector Project between Scott Road and the El Dorado Cotmty line has commenced during the term of the required Subdivision Improvement Agreement, then the shoulder improvement condition will be deemed satisfied and the security shall be released to the owner/applicant.

The owner/applicant shall preserve the oak trees shown in the blue color on the attached Site Plan Exhibit for the Traditional Subdivision. The owner/applicant shall also make every attempt to preserve the tee shown in red on the attached Site Plan Exhibit provided thar the City Arborist concurs (since this oak tree will be approximaely 3' lower than adjacent pad grades). The additional land created from elimination of lots 49, 56, and 57 as shown on the Site Plan Exhibit shall be incorporated into the adjacent residential lots to the satisfaction of the Commmity Development Department. Consistent with FPASP Policy 10.19, the Community Development Director will allow modifications to the development standards to order to accommodate preservation ofthe oak tree on Lot 62 as shown on the attached Site Plan Exhibit. This condition shall be satisfied prior to approval ofthe Final Map for the Traditional Subdivision.

21.

03/22/2022 Item No.11.

This page is intentionally left blank.

03/22/2022 Item No.11.
lir ,rirr.rr:l
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 312212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10825 - A Resolution Directing the Preparation of Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and
Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IliReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10825 - A Resolution Directing the Preparation of Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge lllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Siena Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs. 1

03/22/2022 Item No.12.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City of Folsom has thirty existing Landscaping and Lighting Districts. Each year, as part of the annual assessment process, an Engineer's Report must be prepared in accordance with the requirement of Article 4 of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code andthe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

The Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 will address all thirty districts in one report and will be submitted for final approval to the City Council.

POLICY / RULE
Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code requires the City Council to adopt aresolution directing the preparation of the Engineer's Report as part of the annual assessment process for landscaping and lighting districts.

ANALYSIS
The Engineer's Report for the thirty Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 will be prepared by SCI Consulting Group. The Preliminary Engineer's Report is expected to be submitted for City Council review and approval on May I0,2022 and the final Engineer's Report and public hearing is scheduled for July 12,2022.

Included within the report for each district will be the following Plans and specifications for the maintenance of the improvements (on file in the Parks and Recreation Department)
Estimate of the cost of maintaining the improvements
Diagrams of the assessment districts
Assessment of the estimated costs for maintaining the improvements Each Landscaping and Lighting District levies and collects funds to cover operating and maintenance costs. The Fiscal Year 2022-2023budget for the Landscaping and Lighting Districts includes funding for the preparation of the Engineer's Report. There is no fiscal impact to the City of Folsom General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
N/A (This does not apply as there is no environmental review aspect to the engineer's report.)
A.

B.

C.

D.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
2 Page 626
03/22/2022 Item No.12.

ATTA
l. Resolution No. 10825 - A Resolution Directing the Preparation of Engineer's Report for the following Landscaping and Lighting Districts for Fiscal Year 2022^2023 American River Canyon North, American River Canyon North No. 2, American River Canyon North No. 3, Blue Ravine Oaks, Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2, Briggs Ranch, Broadstone, Broadstone No. 4, Broadstone Unit No. 3, Cobble Ridge, Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Hannaford Cross, Lake Natoma Shores, Los Cerros, Natoma Station, Natoma Valley, Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No. 2, Prospect Ridge, Sierra Estates, Silverbrook, Steeplechase, The Residences at American River Canyon, The Residences at American River Canyon II, Willow Creek Estates East, Willow Creek Estates East No. 2, Willow Creek Estates South, and Willow Springs
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks & Recreation Director
J Page 627
03/22/2022 Item No.12.

RESOLUTION NO. 10825

A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR

THE FOLLOWING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 AMERICAN RMR CANYON NORTH' AMERTCAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.2, AMERTCAN RIVER CANYON NORTH NO.3, BLUE RAVINE OAKS, BLUE RAVINE OAKS NO.2, BRIGGS RANCH, BROADSTONEO BROADSTONE NO. 4, BROADSTONE UNIT NO. 3, COBBLE RIDGE, COBBLE HrLLS RIDGE IIIREFLECTIONS II, FOLSOM HEIGHTS, FOLSOM HEIGHTS NO.2,

HANNAFORD CROSS, LAKE NATOMA SHORES, LOS CERROS, NATOMA

STATION, NATOMA VALLEY, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH, PRAIRIE OAKS RANCH NO. 2, PROSPECT RIDGE, SIERRA ESTATES, SILVERBROOK, STEEPLECHASE,

THE RESIDENCES AT AMERICAN RIVER CANYON, THE RESIDENCES AT

AMERICAN RIVER CANYON II, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES EAST NO. 2, WILLOW CREEK ESTATES SOUTH, AND WILLOW

SPRINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Folsom, has established thirty Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts described as follows:

American River Canyon North
American River Canyon North No. 2
American River Canyon North No. 3
Blue Ravine Oaks
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2
Briggs Ranch
Broadstone
Broadstone No. 4
Broadstone Unit No.3
Cobble Ridge
Cobble Hills Ridge IllReflections II
Folsom Heights
Folsom Heights No. 2
Hannaford Cross
Lake Natoma Shores
Los Cerros
; and
Natoma Station
Natoma Valley
Prairie Oaks Ranch
Prairie Oaks RanchNo. 2
Prospect Ridge
Sierra Estates
Silverbrook
Steeplechase
The Residences at American River
Canyon
The Residences at American River
Canyon II
Willow Creek Estates East
Willow Creek Estates East No. 2
Willow Creek Estates South
Willow Springs
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 ("Act"), Division 15, Part2 of the Streets and Highway Code, the assessment is for the maintenance of public areas including, but not limited to, landscaped areas, street corridors, project entryways, certain parks, parkways, medians, statuary, residential village entryways, sound walls, fences, project signage, streetscapes, landscape, lighting maintenance and lighting, water and utility bills; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Folsom has determined that said territories will be specifically benefited by the maintenance and servicing of said landscape and appurtenant Resolution No. 10825
Page I of2 Page 628
03/22/2022 Item No.12.
improvements; and
WHEREAS, Sections 22620 through 22631 of the Act provide for annual assessments after the formation of said districts; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to have the City's engineer prepare the Engineer's Report and file the same with the Clerk for submission to the City Council, and that SCI Consulting Group is hereby designated as Engineer of Work for purposes of these proceedings and is hereby ordered to prepare an E-ngineer's Report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter I of the Act and Article XIIID of the Califomia Constitution. Upon completion, the Engineer shall file the Engineer's Report with the Clerk of the Council for submission to the Council; and PASSED AND ADOPTED this}2"d day of March2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10825
Page2 ofZ Page 629
03/22/2022 Item No.12.

This page is intentionally left blank.

03/22/2022 Item No.12.
' '':'I
;-i::ir!"i
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: March 22,2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: ResolutionNo. 10826 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Westnet, Inc. for Fire Station No. 37 First-In Fire Station Alerting System Upgrades FROM: Fire Department
RECOMMENDATION / COI]NCII, ACTION
The Fire Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10826 - A Resolution authorizingthe City Manager to execute an agreement with Westnet, Inc. for Fire Station No. 37 First-In Fire Station Alerting System upgrades.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
A key component of fire and medical emergency services dispatching is fire station alerting.

Once the information required for an emergency response is gathered and the closest resources are determined, the fire station audio and visual alerts are activated. An interface between the Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system and the fire station alert system provides the most efficient method of dispatching emergency resources. Without a fully functioning alerting system, dispatchers must use back up "manual alerting" which takes longer and results in delays in overall response times.

Using the CAD system, the dispatcher enters a dispatch command. The CAD and fire station alert systems are connected to the stations via data connection circuits. The station alert signal activates relays at the stations to ring the station bell, turn on lights at night and open an audio path from the station radio to the station public address system. The dispatcher then proceeds with a voice dispatch with the details of the emergency response. 1

03/22/2022 Item No.13.

A11 Folsom Fire Stations are equipped with Westnet Alerting Systems along with the entire regional area. Westnet, Inc. has installed a dedicated server at the Sacramento Regional Fire/EMS Communications Center (SRFECC) as part of a region wide purchase to greatly enhance the capabilities and speed that emergency incidents are dispatched.

POLICY / RULE
Section 2.36.080, Award of Contracts of the Folsom Municipal Code states, in part, that contracts for supplies, equipment, services, and construction with an estimated value of $66,141 or greater shall be awarded by Ctty Council.

ANALYSIS
Fire Department staff did not solicit bids from fire station alerting companies due to Westnet, Inc. being the sole source provider for emergency alerting in the Sacramento region.

Department staff received quotes for Fire Stations 35,36 and37 from Westnet, Inc. to include installation, one year of technical support, and on-site warranty. Fire Department staff has determined that Station 37 is the priority for Westnet alerting system upgrades in the amount of $91,435.31.

The Fire Department has found the quote to be in order and recommends that the contract be awarded to Wesfiret, Inc. Staff will use the City's standard agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

F'INANCIAL IMPACT
The contract with Westnet, Inc. would be authorized for $91,435.31 Proiect Amount
Station 37 Westnet
Proiect X'unding
$e1 s.31
Amount
FY 2021-22 Proposed Level of Service Approval $ 44,000.00 ARPA Approved Fundine $ 47,435.3r
The Fiscal Year 2021-22 Generul Fund Operating Budget included alerting system upgrades at $44,000. Staff is requesting to utilize approved American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds of $47,435.31 to tully fund the project.
2 Page 632
03/22/2022 Item No.13.

EIYVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not considered a project under Section 15061(bX3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and as such is exempt from environmental review.

ATTACHMENT

1. ResolutionNo. 10826 - A Resolution authorizingthe City Manager to execute an agreement with Westnet, Inc. for Fire Station No. 37 First-In Fire Station Alerting System upgrados.

Submitted,
Ken Cusano, Fire Chief
aJ Page 633
03/22/2022 Item No.13.

RESOLUTION NO. 10826

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH WESTNET,INC. FOR FIRE STATION NO. 37 FIRST.IN F'IRE

STATION ALERTING SYSTEM UPGRADES
WHEREAS' the City of Folsom desires to contract for Fire Station alerting for Fire Station No. 37; and
WIIERSAS, this projectwas-ssle ssuroed fora bid quote with Vlestnet, Inc. in-the-amolnt of $91,435.31; and
WHEREAS' funds in the amount of $44,000 were included in the Fire Department Operating Budget in Fiscal Year 2021'22, fot this purpose; and WHEREAS, an additional appropriation in the amount of $47,435.31 was approved with ARPA tunding; and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attomey:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the Ciry Manager to execute an agreement with Westnet, Inc. for Fire Station No. 37 First-In Fire Station Alerting System upgrades.
pASSED AND ADOPTED this22 day of March2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10826

03/22/2022 Item No.13.
a; i;r,_lir! l.! !,!l.,i1i
Folsom City Council
Staff ort
MEETING DATE: 312212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10827 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with First Serve Productions, Inc. for the Sports Courts Acrylic Resurfacing Project
F'ROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 10827 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with First Serve Productions, Inc. for the Sports Courts Acrylic Resurfacing Proj ect.

BACKGRO IND / ISSIIR,
Several sports courts at various city facilities, including tennis courts, basketball courts, and pickle ball courts, are showing surface and structural degradation from normal use as well as seasonal impacts. Freeze and thaw cycles that cause aggregate base layers of the sports courts to shift, have contributed to approximately 5,015 lineal feet of cracked playing surface. To maintain a safe, level, and visually legible sports court surface, both acrylic resurfacing and crack repair should be performed. This project scope anticipates necessary repair requirements to the court surfaces at six park locations in addition to paint striping each court to provide usable and safe sports playing courts at the following locations:
o Ed Mitchell Park (8 Tennis Courts)
o Lembi Community Park (8 Pickle Ball Courts)
o Beacon Hill Park (l Basketball Court)
o Bud & Artie Davies Park(2 Tennis Courts)
o Granite Park(2 Tennis Courts)
o The Preserve Mini Park (l/2 Basketball Court)
1

03/22/2022 Item No.14.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, Public Works projects costing $66,141 or greater shall be competitively bid and contracted for by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
The Notice to Contractors for the City of Folsom Sports Courts Acrylic Resurfacing Project was published on January 5,2022 with noticing to local and electronic bid boards, Builder's Exchanges and the City of Folsom website. No pre-bid meeting was held.

The Parks and Recreation Department received one bid on January 26,2022:

Contractor Bid Add Alternates
1 First Serve Productions, Inc. $183,490.00 $68,375.00
The bid submitted by First Serve Productions, Inc., including the additive alternates, is $183,490 + 68,375:$251,865.00. This is the lowest responsible and responsive bid.

IMPACT
There are multiple funding sources for the park sites listed above with the total project cost outlined below.

Proiect costs:

Total Base Bid $183,490.00

68.375.00Total Add Al #1-7
Sub Total $251,865.00
Total Project Cost s277,052.00
Ed Park:

Proposition 68 Grant funding was awarded specifically for the Ed Mitchell Park tennis courts and will allow a substantial offset to the total project cost as outlined below. These grant monies were approved with Resolution No. 10586 - A Resolution Approving the Allocation of City Match Funding for Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program and Appropriation of Funds. The Proposition 68 Grant amount received is $271,000.00. The amount of $125,328 will be used from this grant funding for the Ed Mitchell tennis courts acrylic resurfacing and crack repair.
8 Court Acrylic Resurfacing $65,328.00
feet
2 Total Ed Mitchell Tennis Courts $125,328.00

03/22/2022 Item No.14.

Lembi Community Park:

Lembi Community Park is currently undergoing a conversion from two tennis courts to eight dedicated pickle ball courts. This conversion includes the acrylic resurfacing and striping. The eight pickle ball courts also require crack repairs to provide a usable and safe playing surface.

The eight pickleball courts, surfacing and crack repairs will be funded through the Folsom Pickleball Club (FPC).

Tennis to Pickle ball conversion $18,000.00
crack
Total Lembi Pickleball $31,125.00
Beacon Hill Park. Bud & Artie Davies Granite Park- The Preserve Mini Park:

These remaining sites will all be funded with the Park Renovation Project(PN002013). There are sufficient funds allocated and available to cover the costs of these renovations in the Park Dedication Fund (Fund 240).

Following is a summary of funding sources
Park Renovation Project (PN002013) 120,599.00*
Prop 68 Grant Funding 125,328.00
Lembi Pickleball from Folsom Pickleball Club 31.125.00
Total Project Cost $277,052.00
* Includes Contingency

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, 15300.1 - Relation to Ministerial Projects.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution No. 10827 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with First Serve Productions, Inc. for the Sports Courts Acrylic Resurfacing Project.

Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Director
Parks & Recreation Department
J Page 637
03/22/2022 Item No.14.

RESOLUTION NO. 10827

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH FIRST SERVE PRODUCTIONS, INC. F'OR THE SPORTS

COURTS ACRYLIC RESURF'ACING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom staff determined the need to resurface and repair the sports courts of Beacon Hill Park, Bud & Artie Davies Park, Ed Mitchell Park, Granite Park, Lembi Community Park, The Preserve Mini Park, The Shores Park; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department published a Notice to Contractors for bidding of the City of Folsom Sports Court Acrylic Resurfacing Project on January 5,2022; arfl WHEREAS' bids were opened on January 26,2022, and one responsive and responsible bid was received; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsive bid of $251,865.00 was received from First Serve Productions,Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the project will include a contingency of l0%o ot $25,187 for unanticipated sports court structural conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom Sports Court Acrylic Resurfacing Project is exempt under Article 19 Section 1500.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, there is sufficient funding budgeted and available in the Park Dedication Fund (Fund 240); and
WHEREAS, the Folsom Pickleball Club will provide funding in the amount of $31,125; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes:
l. The City Manager to execute a contract, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, in the amount of $ZS t ,965 with First Serve Productions, Inc. for the City of Folsom Sports Court Acrylic Resurfacing Project.

2. The City Manager, or designee, to approve project change orders not-to-exceed $25,187 for work associated with unanticipated sports court structural conditions. pASSED AND ADOPTED this22"d day of March2022 by the following roll-callvote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Resolution No. 10827

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR

03/22/2022 Item No.14.

ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10827
Page2 of2 Page 639
03/22/2022 Item No.14.

This page is intentionally left blank.

03/22/2022 Item No.14.

Book 2 Page 84
Folsom Public Financing Authority
Decembet 14,202I
Meetins Minutes
Joint Folsom Gitv Gouncil. Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agencv. Folsom Public Financinq Authoritv, South of 50 Parkinq Authority, and Folsom Ranch Financins Authoritv Meetinq
December 14.2021
ROLL CALL: Gouncil/ Board Members: Howell, Rodriguez, Aquino, Ghalamcherla, Kozlowski
CONSENT GALENDAR:

35. Approval of the September 14,2021 Joint City Council / Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Meeting Minutes

36. Receive and File the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority Monthly lnvestment Reports for the Month of September 2021 Motion by Gouncil/Boardmember Kerri Howell, second by Council/Boardmember Rosario Rodriguez to approve the consent calendar.

Motion carried with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Gou nci l/Boardmem ber(s) :

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Gou nci l/Boardmem ber(s) :

Council/Boardmember(s) :

Cou nci l/Boardmember(s) :

Howell, Rodriguez, Aquino, Chalamcherla,
Kozlowski
None
None
None

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the joint City Council / Redevelopment Successor Agency / Public Financing Authority / Folsom South of 50 Parking Authority / Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, the meeting was adjourned to the regular City Council meeting at 10:28 pm.

SUBMITTED BY
Christa Freemantle, City Clerk/Board Secretary
DRAFT - not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 641 03/22/2022 Item No.15.

Book 2 Page 85
Folsom Public Financing Authority
December 74,2027
ATTEST:

Mike Kozlowski, Mayor/Board Chair
DRAFT - not fficial until approved by the City Council Page 642 03/22/2022 Item No.15.

Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RE,COMMENDATION / COIINCIL ACTION
The Finance Department recommends that the City Council receive and file the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority monthly Investment Reports for the month of December 2021.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Under the Charter of the City of Folsom and the authority granted by the City Council, the Finance Director is responsible for investing the unexpended cash of the City Treasury. The primary objectives of the Crty's investment policy are to maintain the safety of investment principal, provide liquidity to meet the short and long-term cash flow needs of the City, and earn a market-average yield on investments. The City's portfolio is managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and is consistent with state and local laws and the City's investment policy. The Finance Department hereby submits the investment reports for the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority for the month of December 2021.

MEETING DATE: 3t2212022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Receive and File the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority Monthly Investment Reports for the Month of
December 2021
F'ROM: Finance Department
I

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

POLICY / RULE
l. Section 3.30.010(a) of the Folsom Municipal Code states "the term 'city' shall encompass the city of Folsom, the Folsom community redevelopment agency, and all other agencies and instrumentalities of the city under either the direct or indirect control of the city council, and this chapter regulates the investment of all moneys of those agencies."

2. Section 3.30.030(0 of the Folsom Municipal Code states that "the city's chief investment officer shall each month submit an investment report to the city council, which report shall include all required elements as prescribed by California Government code section 53646."

3. California Government Code, Sections 53601 through 53659 sets forth the state law governing investments for municipal governments in California.

4. Section 3.30.020(9) of the Folsom Municipal Code states that "all city cash shall be consolidated into one general bank account as set out in this code and invested on a pooled concept basis. Interest eamings shall be allocated to all city funds and subfunds according to fund and subfund cash and investment balance on at least a quarterly basis."

ANALYSN
Overview
The City has diversified investments in accordance with the City Investment Policy and Government Code. The City of Folsom's total cash and investments are invested on a pooled basis as required by the Folsom Municipal Code.

The Portfolio Summary of the City's current report includes a "Pooled Equtty Section" identi$ing the Redevelopment Successor Agency's (RDSA) and Folsom Public Financing Authority's (FPFA) portion of the investment pool. The RDSA and FPFA list these amounts under "Cash" in their respective sections. Currently, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority (FRFA) has no funds invested in Pooled Equtty.

City of Folsom
Total Cash and Investments
The following graph illustrates the City's monthly cash and investment balances for fiscal years 2018 through 2022. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result oftypical receipt of revenues less expenditures for operations, debt service, and capital improvements.

As of December 31,2021, the City's cash and investments totaled $I6t,954,751; an increase of $18,610,988 (13%) from December 31,2020.
2 Page 644
03/22/2022 Item No.16.
+20rilt8
City of Folsom Total Cash and Investments
(Fiscal Year)
+2118/rg
-2Or9l2O -2020121
AUG sEp ocl NOV ,AN Ft8 MAR
+202u22
MAY JUNAPRDECJUTS18o
S160
eoE
s140
sr20
Sloo
S80
The following chart shows the City's monthly cash and investment balances and percentage change for Fiscal Year 2021-22 alongwith the yearly dollar and percentage changes.

Total City Cash and Investments
Monthly
2021-22 Change 2020-21
Monthly
Change
Yeady $
Change
Yearly oh
Change
Jul
Aug
sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
$ 163,280,753
$ 149,509,252
g 146,444,211
$ 146,610,398
s 147,062,416
$ 161,954,751
$ 148,832,109
$ 140,982,833
$ 136,560,020
$ 138,527,756
$ 132,111,422
$ 143,343,763
$ 14,448,645
$ 8,526,419
$ 9,884,190
$ 8,082,642
$ 14,950,994
$ 18,610,988
-8%
-2%
0%
0%
t0%
-5%
-3%
t%
-5%
9%
t0%
6%
7%
6%
tl%
13%
The City's projected cash needs for the next six months are sfficiently provided for by anticipaied revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments. In addition, in accordance with Section 3.30.020(c) of the Municipal Code, less than 50o/o of the City's total cash is invested for a period longer than one year.

JPage 645
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

To Maturity as of December 31, 2021
3d Yrs
4-5 Yrs
10,964,143

2.3 Yrs
14,874,919

8.696
9,141,140 0 Days
22,O70,453

12.8961.2 Yrs
15,483,592
184-355
18,419,108
10,6%
1 Day
73,645,303

42.695
2-183
8,449,848

4.9%
Investment Performance
The City's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of December 2021 is presented in Attachment 1 to this report. Portfolio investment earnings (including pooled equity earnings for the RDSA and FPFA) for the three-month quarter ended December 31, 2027 totaled$324,878. The total rate of return of the investment portfolio for the same period was 0.85o%.

The following graph illustrates the total dollar amount and allocation percentages for December 31,2020 and December 31, 202L. The percentages in this graph are based on book value.
4 Page 646
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Clty of Folsom Portfolio Allocation
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
s-
MunicipalCash - Money Markel Local
Government
lnvestment
Pool
Commercial
Paper
Cerlificates of
Dcposit
Corporate US Agencies
BondsChccking Bonds
!D€ccmber 31, 2020 Cily Portfolio rDocomber 31, 2021 Clly Portfollo +u2%
A detailed listing of the portfolio holdings as of December 31, 2021is included in Attachment 2 to this report.

The Local Government Investment Pool (LAIF) yield typically moves in the same direction as market yields, but is less volatile, lagging somewhat behind market moves. This can be seen in the chart on the next page, illustrating the historical monthly change in yield from July 2019 through December 2021 for LAIF and two-year US Treasury securities. The effective rate of return for the City Portfolio is also included'
The Federal Funds rate reached its post-2008 global economic downturn peak at 2.50% in December 2018. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) began lowering the rate in July 2019, with three cuts resulting in the Federal Funds rate atl.75% as of December 31, 2019. Due to the Covid-l9 pandemic, the FOMC cut rates twice in March 2020, by 50 basis points on March 3rd, and lYo onMarch 15th. The effect of these rate cuts was to push down borrowing costs to help consumers and businesses handle the financial challenges posed by the economic slowdown that resulted from the pandemic. The Fed has maintained these low rates for two years, despite inflationary pressure to raise them, due to weak labor market figures. With the unemployment rate returning to pre-pandemic levels (3.8%February 2022 vs.3.5o/o February 2020), the Fed has signaled they intend to raise the Federal Funds rate at their March 15-16,2022 meeting, most likely by 25 basis points. The expectation has been for two or three more rate increases during 2022, but the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions associated with the conflict has thrown uncertainty into these expectations, as the war is likely to worsen inflation, but also simultaneously slow the economy through higher oil and gas prices and a falling stock market.
5Page 647
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Yield Comparison
Juty 2019 - December 2O2l

3.OOo/o

2.5OYo

2.OOo/o
l.5$o/o
l.OOYo

0.SOo/o
O.OOo/o
1$ eo<l+1"tr$p.S** .$ t"s+"|j}$r.$r- fS eee+$
+r.AIF +2 Yr Trsy -+_city
R
\^.-^
\\ ,\
\
f
A listing of transactions for the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 is included in Attachment 3 to this report.

Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency
Total Cash and Investments
The RDSA had total cash and investments of $l1,074,605 as of December 31, 2021. This is an increase of $212,659 (2%) since December 31,2020. The cash held by the RDSA is comprised of city-held funds, as well as 2011 bond proceeds to be utilized for housing and non-housing projects. These proceeds held by the Agency are broken out individually in the Portfolio Management Summary in Attachment 1.

The following table and graph illustrate the monthly balances and their respective percentage changes for the reporting period. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipt of revenues less expenditures for operations, debt service, and capital improvements.

Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency
2021-22
Monthly
Change 2020-21
Monthly
Change
Yearly $
Change
Yearly Vo
Change
Jul
Aug
sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
-29%
0Yo
0%
0%
48%
-29%
0%
0%
0%
s4%
451,471
414,948
415,013
418,857
423,273
212,659
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,454,334
7,474,685
7,474,875
7,474,989
7,474,989
11,074,605
$ 10,002,863
$ 7,059,737
s 7,059,862
$ 7,056,132
$ 7,051,717
$ 10,861,946
5%
6%
6%
6%
6%
2%
6 Page 648
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency Total Cash and Investments $15,000,000
s10,000,000
$5,000,000
s0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
8 2019.20 .2020-2t 4202t.-22
The RDSA's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The RDSA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of December 2021 is presented in Attachment l. The RDSA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended December 31, 2021 totaled $18,556. The effective rate of return for the RDSA investment portfolio for the same time period is 0.86%.

Folsom Public Financing Authority
Total Cash and Investments
The FPFA cash and investments totaled $38,623,011 as of December 31,2021. This is a decrease of $5,441,753 (12%) ftom December 31, 2020. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receip of debt service repayment revenues and the subsequent debt service expenditures. The following table and graph illustrate the monthly balances and their respective percentage changes for the reporting period.

Folsom Public Financing Authority
2021-22
Monthly
Change 2020-21
Monthly Yearly $
Chanse
Yearly o/o
Chanse
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
$ 43,982,425
$ 43,982,425
$ 38,732,656
$ 38,623,009
$ 38,623,010
$ 38,623,011
$ 58,623,181
s 61,219,871
$ 43,955,323
$ 43,845,768
$ 43,845,770
$ 44,064,764
$ (14,640,756)
8 (17,237,446)
$ (5,222,667)
I (5,222,759)
s (5,222,760)
g (5,441,753)
4%
-28%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
-25%
-28%
-12%
-t2%
-12%
-t2%
7Page 649
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Folsom Public Financing Authority Total Cash and Investments $75,000,000
s65,ooo,ooo
s55,000,000
s45,000,000
$35,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
tr2019-20 82020-2r .202t-22
The FPFA's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The FPFA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of December 202I is presented in attachment 1. The FPFA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended December 31,2021totaled $290,280. The effective rate of return for the FPFA investment portfolio for the same time period is 3.04oh.

Folsom Rsnch Financing Authority
Total Cash and Investments
The FRFA cash and investments totaled $95,290,002 as of December 31,202I, an increase of $11,260,002 from the prior year. This increase is due to the issuance of $11,815,000 Community Facilities District No. 21 (White Rock Springs Ranch) Local Obligations on April 21,2021. The only other activity within FRFA was the maturing of $555,000 of local obligations held by FRFA on September 1, 2021.

The Authority's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The FMA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of December 2021 is presented in attachment 1. The FRFA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended 8 Page 650
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

December 31,2021totaled $1,117,976. The effective rate of return for the FRFA investment portfolio for the same time period is 4.78%.

South of 50 Parking AuthoritY
Total Cash and Investments
The South of 50 Parking Authority cash and investments totaled $0 as of December 3I,2021.

The Authority's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
There is no investment activity for the South of 50 Parking Authority ATT

1. City of Folsom, Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, Folsom Public Financing Authority, and Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Portfolio Management Summary December 2021

2. City of Folsom Portfolio Holdings as of December 31,2021

3. City of Folsom Transaction Summary, Second Quarter of Fiscal Yeat2022 Submitted,
amagni, Finance Director
Agency Finance Officer
Folsom Public Financing Authority Treasurer
Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Treasurer
South of 50 Parking Authority Treasurer
9Page 651
03/22/2022 Item No.16.

ATTACHMENT 1

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Gity of Folsom
Gombined Gity of Folsom, Redevelopment
Successor AgencY, FPFA & FRFA
Portfolio Summaries
December 31,2021lF/.O lL,,S (OlVlI
Cash
Certificate Of Deposit
Commercial Peper
Coryorate Bond
FHLB Bond
Local Govemment lnvestment Pool
Money Market
Municipel Bond
Total , Average
Cash
Non-Housing 201 1A Proceeds
Housing 20118 Proceeds
Money Market
Tot l,Average
Folsom Drrhlic Flnanelno Arilhoritv
Cash
Money Market
Municipal Bond
Total t Averrge
Folsom Ranch
Money Ma]ket
Municipal Bond
Total I Average
W
50 Natoma St
Folsom, CA 95630
(916) 461-6080
Y" of
Portfolio
l$arket
Valur
Market
Value
Martet
Value
ilirkat
value
Days to
Meturilr,
Days to
ilrturltv
Accrued
lntercatYTM/'.

YTM
Cost
0-050%

2.190%
o341%
2"O49Yo

1.0070h
O-228o/o

0.010%
1 "42404

0.8500/6
0_850%

0.850%
o,0050/6
dDCGi

0.850%

0.005%
2-987olo
Cftl Value
2,020,099.00
7,6s0,335.19
7,483,61E.05
17,063,E20.00
6,019,940.00
90,411,204.32
3,284,452.4'l

39.072.879.55
CostValue
3,970,430,27
2,591,295.00
4,512,A77't7

2.91 Cost Value
Face AmounU
Shatos
Book
Value
2,020,099.00
7,650,395.7s
7,464,304.16
17,049,608.85
6,018,555.28
90,411,204.32
3,284,452.41
39,129.986.21
Eook
$ 161,954,7s3.73
'11,o74,602.44
19,249-El
3 173,04E,605.98
Book
Value
3,970,450"27
2,591.295.00
4,512,A77.17

2.94 Book
Value
19,249.81
158,760.76

38.445.000,00
2,020,099,00
7,652,000.00
7,500,000.00
17,030,000.00
6,000,000.00
90,411,204.32
3,2U,452,41
38 AOO OOO O0
?,970,430.27
2,591,295.00
4,512,877.17
2"94
19,249.81
158.760.76
38 rt45 0OO OO
2,020.099.00
7,7A2,A24.40
7,485,575.00
16,g$t,7E7.50
5,972,040,00
90,41'1,2U"32
3,2g/.,452.4'l

39.133.509,00
ol" ol
Portblio
flxt,00
lnbr€st Total Rate
1 s00
221
846
1484.
1 1
742
33,344.,f9
86,664.55
14,237.50
117

4.43 4,34

9.86 3.47

52.33 190

22.51 0.00
100,00

0.790% $ 172,787,755.73
Pooled
City of Folsm Cash and lnvesttnenls (excluding RDSA, FPFA & FRFA amounts) R€development Sucessor Agency (included in RDSA lnvesiment R€pojt) Public Financing Authority (includ€d in PFA lnveslment Report) Folsom Ranch Financing Authodty (included in FRFA lnvestment Reporl) Total Pooled Equity
Faca Amounu
D6{aval^^nant Srraroecar Aacncv YTM a Cost ihrac
184.474,51'
t 173,006,348.52 $ 173,048,805.98 t rru,023,49{.63 33tl $ 318,721.0s

93.59%
630%
0_01%

0.00%
100.00%
Accrued
lntaEsl
%ol
Poilfollo
3,970,430,27
2,591,295.00
4,512,477.17

2.94 Days to
ilaturitv
Days to
lltturitv
Accrued
lntenst
Accrued
lnterEst
35"85
2?.40
40"75
0,00
100.00
%ol
Portfolio

0.05 0.41

99.54 100.00
V. of
Poilfolio
I
I
1 1

0.800%0 ll,o74,6os38 $ 11,07460s,38 S 11,074,605.38 $ 1t'074'605.38 It Face AmounU
l]h.6e Costvalue
19,249^81
158,760 76
3a.445.000,00 2695 382.784-00
t 38,623,0'10.5? 3 36,623,010.57 $ 38,623,010.57 2683 3 382,784.00 19,249.81
15E,760,76

38.445.000.00
Financlna Authoritv YTM @ Cost

2.E87./" I 3E,623,010.57
FaceAmounu
Sharcs
Book
Value

1.81 95.290.000.00
o.005%

4.641%

1.81 95 290 000 00

1.81 9s 290.000.00

1.81 95.290.000,00 7397 1.474.254"16
\;:e' ,;7t -1--

4.941% $ 95,290,001.81 $
Maiclr.E.2022
$ 657,776.84
33,50/..47
606,628.46
Stacey Tamagni, Finance Direc{or Date
95,290,001.81 $ 95,290,00r.E1 t 95,290,001.81 7397 t 1,474,254.18 100.00

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

ATTACIIMENT 2

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

City of Folsom
Portfolio Holdings
Portfolio Holdings for lnv. Report
Report Format: By Transaclion
Portfolio / Report Group: City of Folsom
Group By: Security TyPe
Average By: Face Amount / Shares
As ol 1213112021
Doocrlptlon ls!uor Coupon
Rat FsceAmUSh.r€E
clc ol
Portfollo
Gash
Wells Faroo Cash Wells Faroo 0.000 20,099.00 0.01
Wells Farco Cash Wells Faloo 0.050 2.000.000.00 1.16
Sub Tolal / Averaoe Cash 0.050 2.020.099.00 1.17
Aooalachian Communitv CU 3.2 212812022 Aooalachian Communltv CU 3.200 245,000.00 Belmont Savinos Benk 2.7 5 311412023 Belmont Savinos Bank 2.750 246,000.00 o.'14 10t18t2022 Beneficial Bank 2.1 s0 247.000.00 0.14
Centerstate Bank, NA 1.4313012022 Cenlerstate Bank, NA 1.400 248.000-00 0.14 CIT Bank, NA 1.05 312812022 CIT Bank, NA 1.050 248.000.00 0.14 Citizens DeDosit Bank of Arlinalon , lnc. 3.1 61291 Citizens Deooslt Bank of Arlinoton, lnc. 3.100 246,000.00 0.14 Discover Bank 2.25 211512022 Discover Bank 2.250 247,000.0( o.14 Essential FCU 3.55 121512023 Essential FCU 3.550 245.000.00 0.14 Farmer's & Merchants Bank3.3 912712023 Farme/s & Merchants Bank 3.300 24s.000.00 0.11 First Bank of Hiqhland Patuz.2 812312022 First Bank of Hishland Park 2.200 247.000.00 o.14 Greenstate Credit Union 1,5 212812022 Greenstate Credit Union 1.900 249,000.00 0.14 Jefferson Financial FCU 2.45 1 1 I I 012022 Jefferson Financial FCU 2.450 245,000.00 o.14 Jonesboro State Bank 1.1 121812026 Jonesboro State Bank 1 .100 249.000.00 0.14 Medallion Bank 2.15 1011112022 Medallion Bank 2.'150 247.000.00 0.14 Moroan Slanlev Bank, NA 2.2 712512024 Moroan Stanlev Bank. NA 2.200 247.000.00 0.14 Moroan Slanlev Prlvate Bank. NA2.27t1812024 Moroan Stanlev Private 8ank. NA 2.200 247,000.00 0.14 National Coooerative Bank. NA 3.4 1212112023 National Cooperative Bank, NA 3.40C 24s,000.00 0.14 Neiqhbors FCU 3.3 gl1gt2o23 Neiqhbors FCU 3.300 245.000.00 0.14 New York Community Bank 0.65 911012024 New York Communitv Bank 0.650 249.000.00 0.14 Ravmond James Bank. NA 1.95 812312023 Ravmond James Bank, NA 1.950 247,000.00 0.14 Sallie Mae Bank2.6 411812O22 Sallie Mae Bank 2.600 246,000.00 0.14 Svnchronv Bank 2.4 511912022 Svnchronv Bank 2.400 240,000.00 0.14 Svnovus Bank 1.45 1011712022 Svnovus Bank 1.450 248.000.00 0.14 Texas Exchanoe Bank. SSB 1.25 1211012026 Texas Exchanoe Bank. SSB 't.250 249,000.00 o.14 T|AA. FSB 2.2 8t16t2022 TIAA. FSB 2.200 247,000.00 0.14 Toyota Financial Savinss Bank 0.65 919t2024 Tovota Financial Savinos Bank 0.650 249.000.00 0.14 UBS Bank USA2.9 41312024 UBS Bank USA 2.900 249.000.00 0.14 Uinta Countv Bank 2.6 211612023 Uinta Counlv Bank 2.600 246.000.00 o.14 VisionBank of lowa 2.15 513112022 VisionBank of lowa 2.150 247,000.00 0.14 Wells Faroo National Bank West LV 1.9 112912023 Wells Faroo National Bank West LV 1.90( 249.000.00 0.14 Wex Bank 1.4 41812022 Wex Bank '1.400 248.000.00 0.14
Suh Total / Averade ceriificate Of Deoosit 2.182 7.652.000.00 4.43 Naiixis NY O 8l,1912022 Natixis NY 0.000 5.000.000.001 2.89 fovota Motor Credit Cotp o 7 t2O12022 fovota Motor Credit Corp 0.000 2.500.000.001 '1.45 ub Tolel / Averaoe Commercial Paoer 0.000 7.500.000.001 4.34 Bank of America Coto O.8 212412026-22 Bank of America Com 0.800 2.000,000.001 1.16 Bank of Monlreal 1.22 311712026-22 Bank of Montreal 1.220 2.000.000.001 1.16 lank of Montreal S|ep713012025-21 Bank of Montreal 1.000 2.000.000.001 1.16 Bank of NY Mellon 2.6 2n12022-22 Bank of NY Mellon 2.600 1,000,000.001 0.58 Bank of NY Mellon 3.5 4/28/2023 Bank of NY Mellon 3_500 1.000,000.001 0.58 Barclavs Bank PLC 3 1011712023-22 Barclays Bank PLC 3.000 2.000.000.001 1.16 MUFG Union Bank NA 3.15 41112022-22 MUFG Union Bank NA 3.150 1.000.000.001 0.58 Pacific Lif€ GF ll 1 .2 612412025 Pacific Life GF ll 1.200 '1.500.000.001 0.87 State Street Com 2.653 511512023-22 Stale Str€et Coto 2.653 2.530,000.001 1.46 Wells Faroo & Co 2.625 712212022 Wells Faroo & Co 2.625 1.000.000.001 0.58 Wells Faroo & Co.3-069 112412023-22 Wells Faroo & Co. 3.069 1.000.000.001 0.58

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Total / Averaqe Corporate Bond 2.0841 17.030,000.00 9.86

0.600 2.000,000.001 1 .'16FHLBo.6 12t1

1.375 2.000,000.001 1 .16FHLB
zooo,ooo.ool 1.160.500FHLB

3.476.000.000.0010.825FHLB
F

FPFA LGIP
F o.22Sl 65,114,301.851 3?.q!

LAIF FPFA
-0.{za1
2s,296,9o2.471 't4.61
o.228l 90.411 ,204321 52.33

0.0101 1.2U.098.s7 o.71
Wells Faroo MM Wells Farqo 0.0101 2,050,353.84 1 .19
weraoe Monev Market 0.0101 3.2U,452.41 1.90
8t1 Alvord USD GOBs 1.062 1,280,000.00 0.74
Shores SD 0.269 12022 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.26S 300,000.00 o.17 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.369 125.000.0( 0.07
getmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.638 81112024 telmont-Redwood Shores SD 0.638 250,000.00 o.14 B 0.269 Belmont-Redwood Shores SD Ser B 0.269 140,000.00 0.08 Shores 0.369 Belmon[-Redwood Shores SD Ser B 0.369 170,000.00 0.10 Hills PFA Rev 0.493 300.000.00 o.17
Rev 0.73 Hills PFA 0.730 300.000.00 0.'17
St DWR Pwr 5t'l CA St DWR Pwr SUPP 2.000 1,000,000.00 0.58 DWR Pwr 2 t2022 Pwr Rev 2.000 1,000,000.00 0.58

1.913 Cabrillo CCD 1.913 230,000.00 0.13
Fin Auth Rev 1Cal 6at St fltn fac Pin Auth Rev 1.893 1.000,000.00 0.58 Carson 2.992 Carson RDA SA TABS 2.992 100.000.0 0.06

0.23TABs 8nt2a22 arson RDASA TABs 0.909 400,000.00
RDASA iarson RDASA TABs 0.981 300,000.00 0.17
TABS 1.188 Carson RDASA TABs 1 .188 o.23
TABS 1 Carson RDASA TABs 1.288 300.000.( 0.17

0.669 8/1
8t1t2025
ccD I 8t1t2023
Citrus CCD GOBs 0.669 400,000.00 0.23
ccD 0.819 400,000.00 0.23
Coast CCD GOBs 1.975 1,265,000.00 0.73

0. 0.702 1.000,000.00 0.58
8t112024 Colton USD 0.882 1.000,000.00 0.58
Revenue 0.685 11
Davis TABS 9t1t2022
Revenue 0.685 500.000.00 0.29
DaViS RDA-SA TABS 't.720 1.225.000.00 0.71

RDA-SAT
USD
Dist 1
TABs 1.750 625,000.00 0.36
Dixon USD 0.953 100.000.00 0.06
Folsom Cordova USD lmp Dist 2 2.000 't60.000.00 0.09
USD lmp Disl 2 2 1 Ql 1 12O23 otsom Cordova USD lmD Dist 2 2.000 165,000.00 0.10 Cordova USD lmp Dist 22101112024 FolCom Cordova USD lmp Dist 2 2.000 1,000,000.00 0,58 USD 2
RDA.SA 2.25 U1
Folsom Cordova USD lmp Dist 2 2.000 1.040,000.00 0.60
otttanO nOR-Snfngs 2.250 390.000.0 0.23
ESD 0.97 {ope ESD 0.97 300.000.00 0.17

1.17 8t1t2026 HoDe ESD 1.170 285.000.00 0.'t6
LA RDA Auth 2
Los Altos
ABs
LA Cntv RDA Ref Auth 2.000 1,235.000.00 0.71
SD 1.000 2.000.000.0 1.16
Murrieta RDA-SA TABs 2.500 250,000.00 0.14

0.561 Oak Grove SD 0.561 600.000.00 0.35
ornard SD GOBs 0.587 81112022 Oxnard SD GOBs 0.587 700,000.00 0.41 Oxnard UHSD 0.372 81 1 12022
Oxnard SD GOBs 0.820 345,000.00 0.20
oxnard UHSD 0.372 250.000.00 o.14
1 trnard UHSD 1.256 500,000.00 0.29
Palomar CCD 0.881 81112025 Palomar CCD 0.881 300,000.0c 0.17

0.67 Pittsburo USD .0-670 680,0001tc !.3S
ccD 0.634 91112024

1.84 711
8t1t2024
Rancho Santiago CCD GOBs 0.634 1.000.000.00 0.58
FiversiUe CnU PfA 1.840 195.000.0( 0.11
San Bernardino CCD 0.605 1,000,000. 0.58

0.921 9t1t2025 San Jose Evergreen CCD 0.921 1.000.000.00 0.58 RDA-SA San Jose RDA-SA 2.630 '1,000,000.00 0.58
San Jose RDA-SA 2.630 1.000,000.00 0.58

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Jose 8t1t2023 San Jose RDASA TABs 2.828 500,000.00 0.29 Sinta Clarita PFA Lease Rev 0.976 6/112024-20 Santa Clarita PFA Lease Rev 0.976 3s5"000.00 0.21 PFA Lease t2025-20

2.621
Rev 1.176 360.000.00 0.21
SF BART Rev Bonds 2.621 735.000.00 0.43
of Texas 11 St. of Texas GOB'S 3.011 2,000,000.00 1 .16 ol CA
CA 0.628
State of CA GO 2.500 1,000,000.00 0.58
Univ oI CA Revenue 0.628 125,000.00 0.07
of GA 0.833 Univ of CA Revenue 0.833 250.000.00 0.14
Univ of CA Revenue 2.657 5fi5l2023:19 Univ of CA Revenue 2.657 500,000.00 0.29 Univ of CA Revenue 3.283 511512022'18 Univ of CA Revenue 3.283 500,000.00 0.29 Contra Costa g1t2a22 Wesrcontra Costa USD 1.434 360,000-00 1 West Contra Costa USD 1_76'l 1.000.000.00 0.58
Area 1.847 West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agy 1.847 200.000.00 o.'12 /osemite CGD 0.561 1.000.000.0 0.58
Yosemite CCD 0.804 81112024 Yosemite CCD 0.804 500,000.00 0.2S

1.534 38.890.000.00 22.5'

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

ATTACHMENT 3

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

Gity of Folsom
Transactions Summary
Transaction Summary - lnvestment Report
Portfolio / Report Group: City of Folsom
GrouP BY: Action
Begin Date:1010112021, End Date: 1213112021
Osicrlption Securlty Type Seltlement
Dab teturltyDate Face
AnrUSharse Prlnclpal YTU@
Cost
State 1. 1218t2026 Certificate Of Deposit 't2t8t2021 't2t8t2026 249.000.001 249,000.00 1-100 NY 9t2022 nmmercial Paoer 12t21t2021 8t19t2022 s.ooo.ooo.ool 4.998.284.72 0.351 8t1t2022 MuniciDal Bond 't1t23t2021 8t11202:, 250,000.001 250,000.00 0.372 1 Municioal Bond 11t2312021 8t1t2025 500,000.001 500,000.00 1.256 Palomar CCD 0,88'l 8/1/2025 lunicioal Bond 10t13t2021 8t1t2025 300.000.001 300,000.00 0.88'l of GOB's 1 Municipal Bond 10t4t2021 10t'U2026 2.000.000.001 2.169.260.00 1.256 SSB 1 Certificate Of Deposit 12t10t2021 12t10t2026 249.000.001 249.000.00 1.254 Bank 0,65 certificats Of Deposit 12t6t2021 9t9t202 249,000.001 247.584.19 0.859 Tovota Motor Credit Com 0 712012022 commercial Paoer 12t22t2021 7t20t2022 2.500.000.001 2,495,333.33 0.321 Sub Total / Averaoe Buv 1 1.297.000.001 1 1.448,462.24
Matured

2.982 11 Municloal Bond 11t1t2021 11t1t2021 300,000.00 300.000.00 Public Service CU 3.15 1012612021 Certificate Of Deoosit 10t26t2021 10t26t2021 245,000-00 245.000.00 0.000 \rrtured 545,000.00 545,000.00

03/22/2022 Item No.16.

This page is intentionally left blank.

03/22/2022 Item No.16.