4 Five programs performed at or above 100 percent of their anticipated program goals, while five programs performed below their projected goals in the 2021 program year. The following paragraphs detail each program’s performance and provide explanation for each activity’s achievements and challenges.
Below Goal - Explanation of goal outcomes
Sacramento Self-Help Housing (SSHH) Renters Helpline reached 47 percent of its goal, or 211 of the goal to serve 450 persons. SSHH continues to struggle with a reduction in staff capacity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Renters Helpline is a regional program funded by the City and County of Sacramento, City of Elk Grove, City of Citrus Heights, and the City of Rancho Cordova. The City continues to jointly monitor this program with its partner jurisdictions and is seeking to improve SSHH’s program capacity.
Sacramento Self-Help Housing (SSHH) Housing Counseling reached 78 percent of its goal, or 117 of the goal to serve 150 persons. This is an improvement from last year, as SSHH only reached 25 percent of its goal to serve 150 persons in 2020. However, due to poor overall performance, this program will not be funded by CDBG in the 2022 program year.
Resources for Independent Living reached 0 percent of its goal to serve 3 persons with home modification services. Resources for Independent Living had difficulty reaching persons in need of this service.
Folsom Cordova Community Partnership reached 48 percent of its goal, serving 58 out of 120 youth.
Folsom Cordova Community Partnership continues to struggle with the impacts of COVID-19 and its consequences on youth involvement in its programs.
Rebuilding Together Sacramento reached 72 percent of its goal. A total of 13 projects were completed out of the annual goal of 18, all of which helped to serve low- to moderate-income individuals and seniors. The projects consisted of four roof replacements, two HVAC system replacements, one accessibility modification, and seven other critical system repairs. Rebuilding Together Sacramento did not reach its goal to assist 18 homes due to rising supply and labor costs as well as the provision of unexpected repairs to their clients’ homes.
Above Goal – Explanation of Outcomes
Code Enforcement reached 124 percent of its goal. The City-operated Code Enforcement program continues to help proactively address health and safety issues in both residential and commercial neighborhoods in the CDBG target area. In the 2021 program year, Code Enforcement officers responded to a total of 2,472 instances of code violation issues.
Rental Housing Inspection reached 139 percent of its goal. The Rental Housing Inspection program has been a pivotal program in addressing various housing conditions in rental housing units in the CDBG target area. The City uses CDBG funding to leverage the program and support the goal of inspecting ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
5 every registered rental unit in the City in two-year cycles. The program allows the City to proactively address deferred maintenance and housing conditions that pose health and safety risks to tenants without requiring tenants to first report on the housing conditions and risk potential retaliation from property owners and landlords. In the 2021 program year, 2,228 inspections occurred through the Rental Housing Inspection program.
The City’s Public Work’s Sidewalk Improvement project began construction during the program year and has drawdown funds. This project is still in progress and will be completed in 2022.
Meals on Wheels reached 177 percent of its goal. The Meals on Wheels program expected to serve 180 seniors but ended up assisting a total of 319 seniors in the program year. Due to COVID-19, there was higher demand for its services.
Boys & Girls Club reached 466 percent of its goal and was able to serve 466 youth, over its goal to serve 100.
Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.
The 2021 program year was the second year of the 2020-2024 Five Year Consolidated Plan. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identifies the following nine goals and priorities for projects that the City intends to fund through CDBG allocations during the plan’s five-year cycle. Those goals are as follows:
• Homelessness Prevention • Public Infrastructure • Public Facilities • Senior and Disability
Services
• Homeless Housing • COVID-19 Preparation,
Prevention, and Response
• Child and Youth Services • Housing Preservation
Program
• Program Administration
CDBG-funded programs in the 2021 program year aligned with seven of the nine goals that are outlined in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. The seven goals supported in 2021 were Homelessness Prevention, Senior Services, Child and Youth Services, Public Infrastructure, Housing Preservation Program, COVID19 Preparation, Prevention, and Response, and Program Administration (through CDBG-CV funding).
Table 1 above shows these goals and their associated projects in more detail, along with the one-year progress against the five-year goals established in the Consolidated Plan.
CARES Act CDBG-CV Funding Summary (Round 3 Allocation)
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES), Public Law 116-136 was signed by the president of the United States. This made available $5 billion in Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funds to respond to the growing effects of the historic ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
6 COVID-19 public health crisis. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) informed the City of Rancho Cordova that CARES Act funding would be allocated to the City based on the existing entitlement formulas for the CDBG program.
CDBG-CV funding was allocated to jurisdictions in three phases. HUD allocated the first and third phases of CDBG-CV funds to the City in the amount of $373,379 and $487,938, respectively. The City did not receive funding in the second phase of funding. During the 2021 program year, the City allocated the third phase of funding (Round 3) to public service projects. Each project was selected to assist in carrying out the City’s CDBG priority need of COVID-19 Preparation, Prevention, and Response, as identified in the amended 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan’s Strategic Plan. The following explanations are only brief summaries of program activities for Round 3 of CDBG-CV funding. The City of Rancho Cordova will provide the public with a full and more detailed report on all CARES Act-funded activities once further direction is provided by HUD regarding reporting requirements. • CDBG-CV Round 3 Activity Summaries:
o $7,697 in funding was allocated to Sacramento Self-Help Housing for a renter’s helpline, which provided counseling and mediation services for landlord/tenant disputes for City residents in a housing crisis or dispute. (Note: funding for this activity is from CDBG-CV Round 1 because SSHH’s contract was extended into the 2021 program year).
o $20,000 in funding was allocated to Sacramento Self-Help Housing for Navigator services, a program that provided support to transitional homeless and susceptible individuals by way of providing up to three months of rental and utility assistance and covering direct deposits.
o $150,000 in funding was allocated to Folsom Cordova Community Partnership for Relief Safety Net Services, which provided rental assistance, utility assistance, and emergency services, including the provision of food, diapers, and disinfectant supplies.
o $35,000 in funding was allocated to Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Sacramento to provide clothing and cold weather items to youth as well as academic packets, online club programs, food and snacks, books, DIY STEM activities, and family health resources.
o $125,000 in funding was allocated to Meals on Wheels by ACC for a senior nutrition program that would take over for the Great Plates program, which exhausted its funding in the 2021 program year.
o $105,000 in funding was allocated to Rebuilding Together Sacramento for homeownership repairs through the Roof Rehab & Repair Program and the Critical Systems Home Repair program.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
7 o $52,938 in funding was allocated to the City of Rancho Cordova’s Housing Division for the general administrative costs to facilitate and manage the CDBG-CV program.
Administrative costs include the management of monitoring efforts, assisting subrecipients of CDBG-CV funds with information and guidance on CDBG-CV policies and procedures, and any other general administration activities that are involved in the implementation of the CDBG-CV program.
Table 2, below, provides a detailed evaluation of the City’s individual CDBG-CV programs and projects, including accomplishments achieved and funds expended.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
8 Project/Activity Agency/Operator Goal Funding Total
Expenses Indicator Unit of Measure Goal Act. % Comp.
Planning and Administration City Staff
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$52,938 $33,983 NA NA NA NA NA
Renters Helpline Sacramento Self-Help
Housing
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$7,697 $0
Public Services Low/Mod
Housing Benefit Persons Assisted 420 0 0%
Navigator Sacramento Self-Help
Housing
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$20,000 $5,194.43 Public Services Low/Mod
Housing Benefit Persons Assisted 40 3 8%
Senior Nutrition Program Meals on Wheels by ACC
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$125,000 $69,316 Public Services other than
Low/Mod Housing Benefit Persons Assisted 148 106 72%
Emergency Services
Folsom Cordova
Community Partnership
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$60,000 $43,313 Public Services other than
Low/Mod Housing Benefit Persons Assisted 160 587 367%
Rental Assistance Folsom Cordova
Community Partnership
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$90,000 $86,321 Public Services Low/Mod
Housing Benefit Persons Assisted 60 339 565%
Clothes & Kicks for Kids! Boy & Girls Clubs of
Greater Sacramento
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$35,000 $35,000 Public Services other than
Low/Mod Housing Benefit Persons Assisted 155 170 110%
Critical Repair Program Rebuilding Together
Sacramento
COVID-19
Preparation,
Prevention, and
Response
$105,000 $105,000 Public Services Low/Mod
Housing Benefit
Households
Assisted 4 5 125%
Table 2 - Accomplishments – Program Year Accomplishments ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
9 CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).
91.520(a)
Race CDBG %
White 548 46.28%
Black or African American 194 16.39%
Asian 129 10.90%
American Indian or American Native 25 2.11%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 13 1.10%
American Indian or American Native and White 4 0.34%
Black or African American and White 3 0.25%
Asian and White 12 1.01%
American Indian or American Native and Black/African American 9 0.76% Other Multi-Racial 247 20.86%
Total 1,184 -
Ethnicity CDBG %
Hispanic 192 16.22%
Not Hispanic 992 83.78%
Total 1,184 -
Table 3 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative
The table above shows the racial and ethnic distribution of persons who received assistance or services through the regular entitlement CDBG program during the 2021 program year.
The City strives to make all of its programs and activities available to eligible low- and moderate-income residents regardless of sex, race, religious background, or disability. All of the CDBG-funded public service programs, including senior services, youth services, and housing counseling, are available to residents citywide. Projects that focus on facility or infrastructure improvements are generally limited to the CDBG target area to help make sure they benefit as many low- and moderate-income residents as possible.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
10 CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG public - federal $1,037,052 $835,850.36
CDBG-CV public - federal $487,938 $380,560.92
Table 4 - Resources Made Available
Narrative
In the 2021 program year, the City received an award of $635,018, and had $402,034 in prior year rollover funds. The following is a list of 2021 City CDBG programs and approved allocation amounts:
• Planning and Administration
o Planning and Administration – $119,804
o SSHH: Fair Housing Services – $7,200
• Housing Preservation Program
o Rental Housing Inspection Program – $51,000
o Code Enforcement – $51,000
o Housing Repair – $210,761
• Non-Housing Community Development Needs
o Public Infrastructure and Facilities
▪ ADA Sidewalk Improvement Project – $410,561
o Public Services
▪ Folsom Cordova Community Partnership: Group Mentoring Initiative – $43,699 ▪ Meals on Wheels: Senior Nutrition – $42,000
▪ SSHH: Renters Helpline – $9,900
▪ SSHH: Housing Counseling – $24,213
▪ Resources for Independent Living: Home Modification Assistance – $4,500 ▪ Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Sacramento: Club Connect Program – $62,414 All recipient and subrecipient programs performed according to CDBG Laws and Regulations, found in the Federal Code of Civil Procedure, 24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 570 Community Development Block Grants. In addition to all laws and regulations, the City and its subrecipients have made regular drawdowns and completed quarterly reports. All projects, aside from the ADA Sidewalk Improvement project, were completed during the program year, and all projects were completed within their allocated budget. The City has met timeliness requirements every year since becoming an entitlement jurisdiction.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
11 Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned
Percentage
of Allocation
Actual
Percentage
of Allocation
Narrative Description
CDBG Target Area 68% 79%
Rental Housing Inspection, Code Enforcement,
Critical Repairs, and ADA Sidewalks project
take place in the CDBG target area
Table 5 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative
Of the total funding available for the 2021 program year, approximately 79 percent ($609,123) was spent on activities in the CDBG target area (net administration expenses).
Geographic distribution of activities is widely varied, but most activities take place in or near low- or moderate-income areas. The location of an activity largely depends on the type of activity. Some of the City’s 2021 CDBG activities, such as Meals on Wheels and SSHH’s Housing Counseling, are able to serve populations across the entire City, while other projects and programs are located and provided to populations in the CDBG target area. The primary geographic area identified for use in CDBG-funded activities is the CDBG target area, which is made up of census tracts in which more than 50 percent of households earn less than 80 percent of area median income (AMI).
The Rental Housing Inspection program and Code Enforcement activities, funded by CDBG, take place in the City’s designated CDBG target areas, as seen in Map 1 below. The investment of other public and private funds in these areas will provide a comprehensive approach to revitalization.
As shown in Map 1, much of the City, including many residential neighborhoods, is in the CDBG target area. This allows for a significant percentage of the annual CDBG allocation to be focused in these lowmoderate income areas of the City.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
12 Map 1
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
13 Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Federal funds require additional regulation, labor compliance standards, and administration that can add a significant cost burden to a new affordable housing project or a rehabilitation project. For new construction and large-scale rehabilitation of affordable housing, the City prefers to pursue funding that does not significantly increase the building cost, unless there are sufficient federal funds to benefit the project’s bottom line. The CDBG allocation to the City does not add sufficient value to offset the increased costs for most of the City's affordable housing development efforts. Therefore, the City focuses CDBG funding either on projects that are already burdened with the federal reporting requirements or on projects where there is no other viable funding source and the project can be completed with the available CDBG funding.
The City’s CDBG program does not have any match requirements. The City has pursued State of California housing funds whenever appropriate and will continue to look for opportunities to leverage private and non-federal resources. The City will also begin to require that CDBG subrecipients demonstrate sufficient committed non-CDBG funding, so that projects will have the best results for the community and the low- and very low-income residents they are intended to serve. Sources may include tax credits, infrastructure infill grants, sustainable community grants, veterans housing grants, and, for the single-family owner-occupied housing rehabilitation program, CalHome funding.
The City did not utilize publicly owned land or property to address the needs identified in the 2021 Annual Action Plan.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
14 CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Total 0 0
Table 6 – Number of Households
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 0 0
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 0 0
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 0 0
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 0 0
Total 0 0
Table 7 – Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.
In the 2021 program year, the City continued to address its affordable housing needs in a variety of ways. For example, the City’s partnership with Rebuilding Together Sacramento made it possible for income-qualified residents to receive health and safety repairs to their homes. These residents might otherwise not have a habitable home, which could lead to homelessness. The repair program also contributes toward the continued preservation of the existing stock of affordable housing, a high priority goal identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. This program successfully repaired 13 homes within the CDBG target area.
The City also preserves affordable housing through code enforcement and rental inspection efforts, which ensure that all rental housing is safe and habitable. The continued success of the Rental Housing ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
15 Inspection and Code Enforcement programs, run by the City’s Neighborhood Services Division, is largely because of the funding and technical assistance received through the CDBG program.
Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.
The City plans to address housing needs, but without significant additional resources, the City will continue to focus CDBG dollars where they will do the most good for low- and moderate-income households through better access to affordable housing, services, and public infrastructure.
The City’s plan for the 2022 program year is to continue cooperating and actively engaging the County of Sacramento in its attention to homelessness issues, including chronic homelessness and near homelessness. The City will continue to contract with SSHH to provide housing counseling and homelessness prevention to Rancho Cordova residents. For anyone that wishes to learn more information about SSHH, information is accessible to Rancho Cordova residents at https://www.sacselfhelp.org/, by telephone, and by walk-in appointment.
Due to the continued success of Rebuilding Together Sacramento’s Critical Systems Repair project, the City will continue to fund this program in the 2022 AAP. This program has proven to be effective in assisting low-income individuals with housing repairs and directly benefitting individuals who lack alternative options to housing improvements. Additionally, this organization continues to abide by CDBG reporting and reimbursement procedures, which is a beneficial aspect to the administration costs of the CDBG program.
With 2021 program funds, the City allocated $102,000 to the two City-run Neighborhood Services projects: the Rental Housing Inspection program and Code Enforcement. These programs were able to exceed their planned goals for the program year and provide the CDBG target area with blight and nuisance prevention, along with assistance in mitigating rental housing unit dilapidation and safety problems. The City will continue to allocate CDBG funds to these two programs for the 2022 program year.
Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.
Number of Households
Served CDBG Actual % Total
Extremely Low Income 629 53%
Low Income 356 30%
Moderate Income 132 11%
Non-Low/Moderate Income 67 6%
Total 1,184 -
Total Low-to-Moderate
Income Persons Served 1,117 94%
Table 8 – Number of Households Served
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
16 Narrative Information
Income categories for the CDBG program are set through the HUD Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI) formula. HUD adjusts this formula each year to address inflation and changes in household costs. The CDBG requirement is that a minimum of 70 percent of all CDBG recipients must be low to moderate income. The HAMFI for Sacramento County in the 2021 program year was $90,625 for a family of four; since 80 percent of HAMFI is considered low income, this calculates to $72,500 for a family of four. All persons assisted with CDBG-funded programs are required to provide income data to identify which category they fit: extremely low income (30 percent or less of HAMFI), low income (31-50 percent of HAMFI), moderate income (51-80 percent of HAMFI), or above moderate income (81+ percent of HAMFI). About 94 percent of persons assisted through CDBG funds were low- to moderateincome individuals.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
17 CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City established a set of strategies and priority actions to expand homeless services and provide supportive housing opportunities to elderly persons, disabled veterans, and other persons with special needs. Since CDBG funding fluctuates from year to year, the City is seeking additional funding for programs and services aimed at assisting homeless persons and non-homeless special needs populations to supplement funding of current programs.
During the 2021 program year, the City continued its relationship with SSHH to assist homeless and special needs populations. SSHH provides vital homelessness prevention services and resources to individuals and families who are at imminent risk of homelessness due to housing discrimination and/or landlord disputes. SSHH provides a Renters Helpline, as well as Housing Counseling, to help with landlord/tenant disputes and housing discrimination cases. A collaborative approach between SSHH, California Apartment Association, and Project Sentinel provides a telephone hotline, tenant education and housing assistance, and mediation services for Rancho Cordova residents in a housing crisis or dispute. The SSHH team deals directly with concerns about landlord/tenant disputes while fair housing issues are identified and referred to Project Sentinel. The collaborative team aims to reduce housing discrimination, promote public awareness of fair housing laws and rights, and assist persons with disabilities, and to protect residents in danger of homelessness.
The City also contracts with SSHH for one full-time Outreach Navigator. The navigator seeks out homeless individuals and families to provide outreach services, which include connecting clients with immediate resources such as mental health services, general health services, substance abuse services, income services, identification documents and other documents necessary to help homeless persons meet the ultimate goal of finding shelter and housing. The Outreach Navigator also assists in gathering information through the Vulnerability Index Service Prioritization Decision Tool or VISPDAT. This program is not funded through CDBG but is supported through other City funds.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The City participates in the regional Continuum of Care (CoC) through the nonprofit Sacramento Steps Forward (SSF). SSF manages the Sacramento Area CoC process, which establishes a set of strategies and priority actions to expand the City’s homeless programs and services and provide supportive housing opportunities and services. The CoC is working on several system updates to improve the flow of shelters and transitional housing, which includes policy and process improvement for the County shelters, lower barriers to housing programs, and improvement to placements into the different housing ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
18 services offered in the region. Rancho Cordova is also home to the Mather Community Campus, a transitional living facility that supports homeless individuals and families and includes job training, as well as housing and supportive services. The City also coordinated with the County, Mather Veterans Administration Hospital, and a competitively selected nonprofit development team to develop a comprehensive range of housing opportunities for homeless, near-homeless, and disabled veterans.
None of these efforts are funded through CDBG and are all supported through other funding sources and staff time.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The City contracts with SSHH to provide counseling to low-income households who are at risk of becoming homeless. This program is intended to prevent homelessness, and the counseling helps individuals and households to maintain housing stability. Clients receiving services from SSHH also include those discharged from public institutions. The Housing Counseling providers keep a detailed database of housing resources that are available to homeless and near-homeless residents. SSHH also provided assistance to tenants facing relocation as the result of the sale or dilapidation of their housing or other catastrophe. Residents can also call the Renters Helpline at (916) 389-7877 and get access to homeless and homelessness prevention services. Through a collaborative approach between SSHH, the California Apartment Association, and Project Sentinel, the City is able to help facilitate the provision of a telephone hotline, tenant education, housing assistance, and mediation services for Rancho Cordova residents in a housing crisis or dispute.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
The City refers individuals to housing counseling providers that keep a detailed database of housing resources that are available to homeless and near-homeless residents. Rancho Cordova is home to the Mather Veterans Village, which provides transitional and permanent supportive housing specifically for homeless and near-homeless veterans in the region. The Mather Community Campus provides units as both a permanent and transitional living facility, as well as offering job training and supportive services for homeless individuals and families to prevent repeated patterns of homelessness. The City does not receive enough in CDBG funds to support these projects solely through the CDBG program and relies on ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
19 coordination with other agencies and nonprofits as well as alternative funding sources to support these projects.
Additionally, the City’s 2013-2021 Housing Element identifies a specific policy to remove potential constraints to housing for persons with disabilities:
• H.3.3 – Provide housing for special needs populations, including housing accessible for persons with disabilities (including veterans as a primary target group), large households, homeless individuals, and single-parent households.
Projects such as the Mather Veterans Village work to address underserved needs of individuals in the City with disabilities and other special needs. Concurrently, goals and policies in the Housing Element, such as the one mentioned above, work to break down barriers to affordable housing among these same populations.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
20 CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The City does not own any public housing; however, the local public housing authority, Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA), manages 747 public housing units across 10 apartment complexes and several single-family homes throughout the City. Additionally, there are 312 affordable housing units of various sizes (1, 2, 3, and 4 bedrooms) in the City, financed by SHRA. The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan does not include plans to construct or operate public housing.
Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
While the City is dedicated to increasing community outreach and involving neighborhoods in the decision-making process, the City does not plan to participate in any activities to increase resident involvement in SHRA-owned and -operated public housing unless specifically asked to do so by SHRA.
Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
SHRA has a Satisfactory Participation Score with HUD.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
21 CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) The City has undertaken a number of actions to reduce potential barriers and constraints to affordable housing and housing for special needs populations. These actions include identifying funds in support of affordable housing development and offering fee reductions, regulatory incentives, density incentives, and the operation of a home rehabilitation and repair program, as well as several other options. Details of these actions can be found in the City’s 2013–2021 Housing Element. The Housing Element includes a thorough analysis of governmental and regulatory barriers to affordable housing. The City has been aggressive in pursuing affordable housing development opportunities and has removed regulatory barriers. Note: the City adopted the 2021-2029 Housing Element during the 2021 program year.
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The need for affordable housing for lower-income households and supportive housing for persons with special needs continues to exceed available resources. The City has provided services, discussed previously in the Homeless and Other Special Needs narrative, and has worked to offer housing opportunities to underserved groups, including homeless individuals and veterans with disabilities. The City continues its active participation in County, Mather Veterans Administration Hospital, and service provider efforts to locate and develop a continuum of housing opportunities for disabled veterans.
The City has continued its work with neighboring jurisdictions, such as the County of Sacramento, City of Sacramento, City of Citrus Heights, and City of Elk Grove, and agencies such as SHRA and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, to address the regional issues that affect the needs of targetincome persons and special needs populations. The goal in this effort is to reduce the burden of providing services within each jurisdiction with CDBG funding. The City has worked directly with service providers and local, state, and federal agencies (e.g., HUD and the California Department of Housing and Community Development).
The City also plans to use its CDBG funds to promote the local provision of services for low- and moderate-income residents in Rancho Cordova. Furthermore, the City will encourage area service providers to offer services in the community. In the 2022 program year, several organizations (including SSHH, Meals on Wheels, and Folsom Cordova Community Partnership) are being funded with CDBG funds and continuing to provide services in Rancho Cordova.
The City addressed the worst-case housing needs of persons with disabilities through activities that serve the City generally. The City funded the Renters Helpline, Housing Counseling, Code Enforcement, Rental Housing Inspection Program, and Critical Repair Program during the 2021 program year:
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
22 • Renters Helpline responds to requests from Rancho Cordova residents in danger of becoming homeless.
• Housing Counseling provides support services to residents at risk of homelessness or to homeless persons to aid them in securing housing.
• Code Enforcement identifies health and safety violations present in single-family housing. • Rental Inspection Program inspects rental units for health and safety violations. • Critical Repair Program provides home repairs to single-family homeowners.
Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City works with a certified lead-based paint inspector to identify lead-based paint hazards when necessary. This inspector is qualified to conduct lead-based paint identification, assessment, and clearance services to reduce lead hazard.
The City complies with the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 as implemented in 24 CFR 35 Subpart B. Compliance includes the following strategy:
Housing Rehabilitation: All housing rehabilitation activities funded under this plan will assess lead hazard risk before proceeding, including the planned Emergency Repair Grant Program. This applies to any work on structures constructed prior to January 1, 1978. The work will comply with the appropriate level of protection indicated in 24 CFR 35.100. All work on homes constructed prior to January 1, 1978, will have a lead hazard risk assessment conducted as described in 24 CFR 35.110. At the completion of any prescribed lead hazard reduction activities, a clearance examination is required as described in 24 CFR
35.110.
When needed, Rebuilding Together Sacramento conducts lead-based paint inspections through a contractor. Additionally, the City provides free printed information regarding the potential hazards of lead-based paint at the City Hall permit counters.
Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City continues to fund public services intended to help poverty-level families. The City’s anti-poverty strategy is based on revitalizing Rancho Cordova’s existing housing stock to provide safe and decent places to live, and on supporting the services of social services agencies that promote income and housing stability. The City’s strategy also includes supportive services for target-income residents, including senior and youth services. For example, the City continued to fund SSHH in the 2021 program year, as SSHH provides vital services and resources to families who are homeless or are at imminent risk of homelessness, and Rebuilding Sacramento Together, a program that helps low-income homeowners rehabilitate necessary health- and safety-related issues in their homes in order to avoid homelessness due to habitability issues.
The City also continued to fund other anti-poverty programs, such as the Senior Nutrition program ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
23 offered by Meals on Wheels and the Folsom Cordova Community Partnership’s Group Mentoring Initiative for Youth populations and their families. This latter program supports youth and enhances community involvement through intensive one-on-one youth mentoring to help improve economic opportunities for low-income youth in Rancho Cordova.
In November 2020, Rancho Cordova voters approved Measure R, a half-cent sales tax measure, which will generate an estimated $8 million revenue for the City’s general fund. Funds may be used to attract jobs and address homelessness.
In November 2014, Rancho Cordova voters approved Measure H, a half-cent sales tax measure, which has generated revenue for the City’s general fund. The local fund is called the Community Enhancement Fund and provides funding for projects administered by individual residents, organizations, businesses, and community partners who are interested in enhancing the Rancho Cordova community. During the 2021 CDBG program year, there were several Community Enhancement Fund projects, many of which will reduce the number of poverty-level families. Projects include, but are not limited to, on-site youth career centers, senior nutritional support, youth meal services, food pantry improvements, home repairs, and a winter homeless shelter.
Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City developed a monitoring system to ensure that the activities carried out in furtherance of the AAP are done so in a timely manner in accordance with the federal monitoring requirements of 24 CFR 570.501 and 2 CFR 200 and all other applicable laws, regulations, policies, and sound management and accounting practices. The objectives of the monitoring plan are described in more detail in the Consolidated Plan.
The City’s Community Development Department is responsible for the management, implementation, and monitoring of Consolidated Plan documents, including the AAP and all other subsequent documents related to the implementation of the CDBG program.
City staff will administer the programs and activities funded with CDBG funds. These staff members will work with the individual City divisions, such as Public Works, as well as partner districts, such as Folsom Cordova Unified School District, to develop procedures and coordinate the administration of programs that will be carried out by these divisions. Designated staff will also work closely with the providers of CDBG-funded services and programs that are not carried out by the City.
Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City strives to provide training opportunities and technical assistance to grant subrecipients and works to establish best practices. The City’s goal is for all subrecipients to update their programs to integrate industry best practices into the day-to-day and long-term activities of programs. In addition, ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
24 the City is continuing its initiative to coordinate activities with neighboring cities, especially in regard to responding to fair housing-related efforts. Coordinated efforts include joint monitoring of common service providers, standardizing reporting requirements and forms to encourage efficiency and consistency, and sharing information from workshops.
During the 2021 program year, the City implemented contracts with local service organizations that provide assistance to senior/elderly households, households at imminent risk of homelessness, and special needs populations. These subrecipients have all received CDBG funding in the past from the City.
City staff and City Council have realized the continued need for these services.
The City will continue its work with neighboring jurisdictions, such as the County of Sacramento, City of Sacramento, City of Citrus Heights, and City of Elk Grove, and agencies such as SHRA and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, to address the regional issues that affect the needs of targetincome persons and special needs populations. The City also intends to work directly with service providers and local, state, and federal agencies (e.g., HUD and the California Department of Housing and Community Development).
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) On June 21, 2021, the City of Rancho Cordova adopted the 2021–2029 Housing Element. The Housing Element includes an analysis of vacant and underused land in the City that can be developed into housing for low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income housing. It also contains an analysis of potential governmental and nongovernmental constraints to housing development in the City as well as policies and goals the City should take to produce more affordable housing.
During the 2021 program year, the City partnered with SSHH to provide fair housing and landlord/tenant services. The City is also a partner in the Renters Helpline, a service offered by SSHH that is designed to determine if calls they receive represent a fair housing issue or a landlord/tenant or life crisis issue.
SSHH staff is trained to answer calls and make accurate determinations. In the City of Rancho Cordova, the Renters Helpline assisted 211 persons between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
25 CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
City staff communicated with the subrecipients’ staff responsible for each activity prior to the beginning of the program year. All subrecipients were informed of the obligations to collect the required information on income, household composition, and race and ethnicity. Staff provided technical assistance to subrecipients throughout the year as needed.
During the 2021 program year, City staff performed desk monitoring to examine the progress the subrecipients were making toward performance targets. Subrecipients are required to report the demographics of their service population on a quarterly basis, as well as additional supporting information such as general ledger and program accounting documents. Each subrecipient agreement contains provisions for reductions to or suspensions of payments in the event that targets are not being met (without valid reason) or past performance issues have not been resolved.
The City has continued to emphasize the importance for subrecipients to gather complete and accurate information on the persons and/or households they serve, and to regularly report their progress.
The City requires all applicable CDBG subrecipients to comply with minority/women business enterprise (MBE/WBE) requirements when procuring their activities. This is written into their subrecipient agreements. At each year’s Notice of Funding Availability meeting, staff informs potential CDBG subrecipients that they will be subject to a monitoring every year that they receive CDBG funds.
Additionally, for all construction projects that require adherence to Davis-Bacon, staff conducts a labor compliance review to ensure the project’s procurement has followed MBE/WBE standards.
In November 2021, CDBG staff conducted monitorings of the Folsom Cordova Community Partnership and Rebuilding Together Sacramento CDBG activities. Both organizations were found to be operating CDBG activities in accordance with HUD regulations and their subrecipient agreements.
The City will continue to conduct ongoing desk monitoring on all CDBG-funded programs throughout the 2022 program year, as well as a monitoring of two subrecipients that will be selected at a later date. The CDBG program has successfully met expenditure deadlines in years past and is on target to meet its deadlines for the 2021 program year. The City is also current on quarterly and semi-annual reports due to HUD.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
26 Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.
This report was made available for public review during a 15-day public comment period from March 4, 2022, to March 21, 2022.
A public notice announcing its availability was published in the Grapevine Independent and posted on the City’s website on February 18, 2022. The public notice included the purpose of the report, the premise of the CDBG program, information identifying the public hearing that will be held to approve of the CAPER, the address of City Hall, staff contact names, mailing addresses, phone numbers, the website to view the report, and information on where to direct comments and questions.
Copies of this CAPER are made available for public review and comment in electronic format found online on the City of Rancho Cordova’s website (www.cityofranchocordova.org). A public hearing to approve of this report will be held on March 21, 2022, at the Rancho Cordova City Council meeting.
All public comments that are received regarding this report will be provided once the final CAPER has been approved by City Council on March 21, 2022.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
27 CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.
NA
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
No.
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.
NA
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 4
MEMORANDUM
ITEM 10.2.
DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Elizabeth Sparkman, Community Development Director SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RIO DEL ORO SPECIFIC PLAN, IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR ELLIOTT HOMES, INC. WHICH ENSURES THAT ELLIOTT HOMES, INC. WILL CONSTRUCT AND PAY THE FULL COST
OF INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDED TO SERVE THEIR PORTION OF THE PLAN AREA
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would approve the Rio Del Oro Specific Plan, Implementation Plan for Elliott Homes, Inc.
BACKGROUND
On August 29, 2016, the City Council approved the Tier Two items for the Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project (RDOSP) including an Addendum to the previously approved Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, a Specific Plan Amendment to amend components of the previously approved Specific Plan, increasing the allowed development by 588 residential units; a Public Facilities Financing Plan; a Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map; an Infrastructure Phasing Master Plan; Affordable Housing Plans; and Amended and Restated Development Agreements. The location of the RDOSP in shown in Figure 1 on the next page.
The Public Facilities Finance Plan (Finance Plan) set forth a strategy to finance required Backbone Infrastructure and other Public Facilities serving the land uses in the RDOSP.
The Financing strategy is designed to assure the City that the required facilities will be constructed when needed and that the development within the RDOSP shall pay the full costs of infrastructure needed to serve the Plan Area, except where other funding sources are appropriate and available. The Financing Plan, in 2016 dollars, included the use of existing fee programs, development of a new Special Financing District, and the use of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District and private funding to finance the approximately $697 million in Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities Improvements. Of these costs, $71 million was expected to be funded by the RDOSP Special Financing District, $133.6 million was expected to be funded by private/other financing, and $492.4 million was
City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 4
expected to be funded by existing and proposed City, County, and Other Agency fee programs.
An Infrastructure Phasing Master Plan is an exhibit to the Financing Plan and sets forth a conceptual phasing plan for the major backbone infrastructure needed to serve the RDOSP.
The ten (10) development phases, comprised of Phases 1 - 5 for the Elliott Homes portion and Phases A - E for the Easton Development Company portion, can be developed independently of each other.
The Property Owners of the Elliott Homes, Inc. portion of the RDOSP, Figure 2 on the following page, has engaged Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., to and prepare a report entitled “Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan – Elliott Homes, Inc.” (the “EHI Implementation Plan”) which ensures that the required facilities will be constructed when needed and that the development within the Elliott Homes portion of the RDOSP shall pay the full costs of infrastructure needed to serve their portion of the Plan Area, except where other funding sources are appropriate and available. As the property owner, EHI has elected not to implement a Special Financing District over their portion of the project to spread the costs of any improvements or facilities not otherwise covered by existing fee programs. Instead, EHI has elected to use private or other financing to make up the difference between total costs of construction, including frontage lanes, and those costs
City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 4
covered by credits in existing programs. A copy of the EHI Implementation Plan is included with this report, Attachment 2, Exhibit A to the Resolution, and is on file with the City Clerk.
Facilities and Costs
The EHI Implementation Plan estimates the costs required to build the backbone infrastructure in Phases 1 - 5 and the estimated funding sources available. The Elliott Homes portion (Phases 1 - 5) will fund various types of infrastructure and public facilities that will serve development in this area. Infrastructure costs have been primarily developed by Wood Rodgers and details of these facilities and their itemized costs are shown in Appendices C and D of the EHI Implementation Plan. The remainder of the costs will be funded through various funding sources including:
City Transportation Development Impact Fee
City Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program
Sacramento Area Sewer District
Sacramento County Water Agency Zone 40
As detailed on Table 3 of the EHI Implementation Plan, total backbone infrastructure and public facilities costs at Project buildout of Phases 1 – 5 equal approximately $183.1 million ($2021). Including approximately $10.2 million in environmental mitigation costs, total improvement costs at Project buildout total approximately $193.4 million. Of these costs, $105.5 million is expected to be funded by private/other financing, and $87.9 million is expected to be funded by existing and proposed City, Sacramento County and Other Agency fee programs.
City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 4
For ease of reference, the EHI Implementation Plan also does the following:
summarizes provisions and fee structures contained within the Amended and Restated Development Agreement and the First and Second Amendments thereto; contains the phasing exhibits from the RDO Infrastructure Phasing Plan; contains roadway sizing and cross-sections from the Specific Plan; and contains maps of the conceptual parks and open space, bike and trails plan, and trails and open spaces plan that will be required to be constructed with development.
Staff will utilize the information contained in the EHI Implementation Plan to guide and require the construction of improvements in Phases 1 – 5 of the plan area. The EHI Implementation Plan is applicable only to the Elliott Homes, Inc. portion of the project and does not create a Special Financing District as referenced in the Finance Plan. It’s possible, and likely, that in the future as the Easton Development Company portion of the project moves forward, that property owner may elect to implement the Financing Plan for Phases A - E through a Special Financing District.
it is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the Resolution adopting EHI Implementation Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the general fund.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - EHI Implementation Plan
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RIO DEL ORO SPECIFIC PLAN, IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR ELLIOTT HOMES, INC.
WHEREAS, August 29, 2016, the City Council approved the Tier Two items for the Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project (RDOSP) including an Addendum to the previously approved Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, a Specific Plan Amendment to amend components of the previously approved Specific Plan, increasing the allowed development by 588 residential units; a Public Facilities Financing Plan; a Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map; an Infrastructure Phasing Master Plan; Affordable Housing Plans; and Amended and Restated Development Agreements.; and
WHEREAS, the Public Facilities Finance Plan (Finance Plan) set forth a strategy to finance required Backbone Infrastructure and other Public Facilities serving the land uses in the RDOSP; and
WHEREAS, the Financing strategy is designed to assure the City that the required facilities will be constructed when needed and that the development within the RDOSP shall pay the full costs of infrastructure needed to serve the Plan Area, except where other funding sources are appropriate and available; and
WHEREAS, the RDOSP identifies ten (10) development phases that can be developed independently of each other comprised of the Elliott Homes portion in Phases 1 – 5 and the Easton Development Company portion in Phases A – E; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner of the Elliott Homes, Inc. (EHI) portion of the RDOSP has engaged Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., to and prepare a report entitled “Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan – Elliott Homes, Inc.” (the “EHI Implementation Plan”), attached as Exhibit A, which ensures that the required facilities will be constructed when needed and that the development within the Elliott Homes portion of the RDOSP shall pay the full costs of infrastructure needed to serve their portion of the Plan Area, except where other funding sources are appropriate and available; and WHEREAS, as the property owner, EHI has elected not to implement a Special Financing District over their portion of the project to spread the costs of any improvements or facilities not otherwise covered by existing fee programs and instead, EHI has elected to use private or other financing to make up the difference between total costs of construction, including frontage lanes, and those costs covered by credits in existing programs; and WHEREAS, the EHI Implementation Plan is applicable to the Elliott Homes, Inc. portion of the project, without the implementation of a Special Financing District, for use by staff to guide and require the construction of improvements in Phases 1 – 5 of the Plan Area; and
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2
WHEREAS, public notice was provided as required by law and a public hearing was held on March 21, 2022, so that the City Council could consider all written and oral testimony prior to taking action on this matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does hereby approve and adopt the Rio Del Oro Specific Plan, Implementation Plan for Elliott Homes, Inc.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st day of March, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
Rio Del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan—
Elliott Homes, Inc.
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cordova
Elliott Homes, Inc.
Prepared by:
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
March 2022
EPS #202007
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ...................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings........................................................................... 6 Summary of Project Entitlements and Agreements ............................ 9 Policy Framework Overview .................................................................. 9 Tier 1 and Tier 2 Entitlements ............................................................. 10 Phasing ........................................................................................... 10 Financing Plan Summary .................................................................... 11 Development Agreement and ARDA ..................................................... 11 Park Development Agreement between Cordova Recreation and Park District and Alta Vista, LLC .......................................................... 14 Cost Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement ....................................... 16 Project and EHI Land Uses ............................................................ 19 Project Land Uses ............................................................................. 19 EHI Land Uses .................................................................................. 19 Easton Development Land Uses .......................................................... 19 EHI Infrastructure Costs, Phasing, and Fee Burdens .......................... 21 Implementation Plan Infrastructure Definitions ...................................... 21 EHI Backbone Infrastructure Costs and Public Facility Requirements ......... 23 Infrastructure and Public Facility Phasing .............................................. 26 Funding Sources ............................................................................... 29 Fees and Costs for EHI Development ................................................... 32 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendices
Appendix A: Guiding Principles for Funding Backbone Road Infrastructure Appendix B: Infrastructure Phasing Plan
Appendix C: EPS Summary of Infrastructure Costs and Credits Appendix D: Detailed Infrastructure Costs and Credits
Appendix E: Phase I Project Phasing Example
Appendix F: White Rock Road Cost Detail
List of Maps
Map 1. Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Boundary and Regional Context ............ 2 Map 2. Rio Del Oro Land Use Plan ....................................................... 3 List of Tables
Table 1. Developable Land Use Summary by Phase ................................. 4 Table 2. Developer-Constructed Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities Cost Summary—Phase 1-5 .............................. 24 Table 3. Sources and Uses of Funds—Phase 1–5 ................................... 33 Table 4. Single-Family Impact and Processing Fees ............................... 34 Table 5. Multifamily Impact and Processing Fees .................................. 35 Table 6. Incentive Fees—ARDA and Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA ......... 37 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 1
Executive Summary
Overview
The Rio del Oro Specific Plan, defined in this report as “RDOSP” or “Project,” is located on approximately 3,830 acres in the City of Rancho Cordova (City), south of U.S. Highway 50 and White Rock Road, north of Douglas Road, and east of Sunrise Boulevard. The Project, located generally west of Grant Line Road, is not demarcated by a roadway on its eastern boundary. Map 1 shows the RDOSP in its regional context.
RDOSP land is owned by two developers: Elliott Homes, Inc. (EHI), and Easton Development Company, Inc. (EDC), collectively referred to as the Master Developers. The Project is envisioned to include a combination of residential, commercial, and park and open space land uses across the 3,830-acre site. The Project includes approximately 12,120 residential units spread over almost 1,950 gross developable acres, as well as almost 510 acres of commercial development, and nearly 1,400 acres of public and quasi-public land uses.1 Map 2 shows the proposed land use plan of the Project, and Table 1 summarizes the buildout land use plan for the RDOSP.
RDOSP Implementation Plan Purpose
This RDOSP Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) relates to the first RDOSP development being commenced by EHI. The City required EHI to prepare this Implementation Plan to guide development of EHI’s portion of new development in the RDOSP.
The primary purpose of this Implementation Plan is to inform EHI, the City, and any subsequent developer in EHI’s portion of the Project about all of the Backbone Infrastructure and Other Public Facility requirements for each development phase. The Implementation Plan also identifies all currently applicable development impact fees and costs and summarizes any cost-sharing arrangements that exist between EHI and EDC.
1 The adopted RDOSP projected approximately 12,190 residential units and 520 acres of commercial development. The projections in this report reflect updated projections from Elliot Homes, current as of January 2022. Projections are rounded.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map 1
2 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map 2
3 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table 1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan ImplementationDevelopable Land Use Summary by Phase Land Use Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Total Phase A Phase B Phase C Phase D Phase E Total TOTAL Residential Uses units/acre
Single-Family 5.0 444 1,063 81 1,132 0 2,720 977 1,479 1,049 1,330 0 4,835 7,555 Medium-Density 8.0 132 159 368 296 0 955 158 536 384 0 0 1,078 2,033High-Density 26.0 300 0 548 596 0 1,444 0 234 858 0 0 1,092 2,536 Subtotal Residential Uses 876 1,222 997 2,024 0 5,119 1,135 2,249 2,291 1,330 0 7,005 12,124 Nonresidential Uses FAR
Local Town Center 0.25 0 0 0 0 265,042 265,042 0000 0 0 265,042 Regional Town Center 0.25 0 0 816,423 0 0 816,423 0000 413,058 413,058 1,229,481 Village Commercial 0.25 0 0 0 109,526 0 109,526 0 109,009 0 0 0 109,009 218,535Business Park 0.30 0 0 0 0 443,005 443,005 0000 638,633 638,633 1,081,638 Industrial Park 0.40 0 0 0 0 3,214,728 3,214,728 0 0 0 682,672 758,989 1,441,662 4,656,390Subtotal Nonresidential Uses 0 0 816,423 109,526 3,922,775 4,848,725 0 109,009 0 682,672 1,810,680 2,602,362 7,451,086 Residential Uses
Single-Family 98.9 219.3 16.8 233.7 0.0 568.7 201.6 304.4 216.6 274.5 0.0 997.0 1,565.7 Medium-Density 20.4 22.0 50.9 40.9 0.0 134.1 21.8 74.1 53.1 0.0 0.0 149.0 283.1High-Density 12.0 0.0 21.1 22.9 0.0 56.0 0.0 9.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 42.0 98.0Subtotal Residential Uses 131.3 241.3 88.7 297.5 0.0 758.7 223.4 387.5 302.8 274.5 0.0 1,188.0 1,946.8 Nonresidential Uses
Local Town Center 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.3 24.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.3 Regional Town Center 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 37.9 112.9Village Commercial 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 10.1 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 20.1Business Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.9 33.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 48.9 82.8Industrial Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 184.5 184.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.2 43.6 82.7 267.2Subtotal Nonresidential Uses 0.0 0.0 75.0 10.1 242.7 327.8 0.0 10.0 0.0 39.2 130.4 179.6 507.3 Total Developable Acres 131.3 241.3 163.6 307.5 242.7 1,086.5 223.4 397.5 302.8 313.6 130.4 1,367.6 2,454.1 lu detail
Source: RDOSP and Wood Rodgers.[1] Updates to Elliott Homes Phase 1 residential and Phase 5 nonresidential land uses current as of January 2022.
Developable Acres
Units per
Acre/FAR
Elliott Homes [1] Easton
Dwelling Units
Building Square Feet
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 4 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 5
This Implementation Plan is based on prior entitlement work already completed, including the following documents:
Tier 1 Entitlement and Development Agreement.
Tier 2 Development Agreement.
Project Public Facilities Financing Plan (Financing Plan), dated August 2016. Infrastructure Phasing Plan.
Affordable Housing Plan.
Project Conditions of Approval.
Park Development Agreement between EHI and Cordova Recreation and Park District (CRPD).
Cost Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement between EHI and Aerojet Rocketdyne Corporation (AR) and EDC, together referred to as AR/EDC.
Much of the detail in this Implementation Plan builds on the Financing Plan, which established the policy framework and technical information to support adoption of the recommended financing mechanism(s) for constructing Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities (as defined in Chapter 4) required to serve new RDOSP development. In this document, the term Improvements will also be used to describe the combination of Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities.
In coordination with the City and EHI, Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) prepared this Implementation Plan. Wood Rodgers, Inc., prepared the engineering design and cost estimates, which are current as of January 2021. Fees applicable to Project development are current as of January 2021.
Project Land Uses and Phasing
Land Use Summary
The RDOSP includes approximately 12,124 residential units over almost 1,950 developable acres of land, and residential development is concentrated in the central portion of the Project. The Project’s 1,950 developable residential acres include the following residential uses:
More than 7,555 single-family units with a density ranging from 2 to 6 dwelling units per acre and an average density of 5 dwelling units per acre. Approximately 2,033 medium-density units envisioned to include a variety of attached and detached products at an average density of 8 dwelling units per acre.
Approximately 2,536 high-density units at an average density of 26 dwelling units per acre.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
6 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
As outlined in the Specific Plan document, of the total residential units, a portion of the high-density units will be made available at affordable levels. The City and RDOSP project owners will enter into an affordable housing agreement, establishing terms and requirements related to the provision of affordable housing.
The RDOSP also includes almost 510 acres of nonresidential development, which consists of retail, office, and industrial development, totaling approximately
7.5 million building square feet.
Approximately 160 acres of the RDOSP are designated as commercial development. This includes 20 acres of Village (neighborhood) commercial, 24 acres of Local Town Center (community) commercial, and 113 acres of Regional Town Center (regional) commercial development.
In the RDOSP, there are 83 acres of Business Park (office) development and 267 acres of Industrial Park (industrial) development. The majority of the office and industrial development is contained in the Employment Center in the northwest quadrant of the Project. The Employment Center is envisioned to support a large variety of uses, including large employment centers, light manufacturing, small professional offices and services, assembly, and other moderate to heavy industrial uses.
Phasing Plan
As described, the Financing Plan established the policy framework regarding Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facility requirements, as well as conceptual Project phasing and financing. The Specific Plan and Appendix B of this Implementation Plan include an Infrastructure Phasing Plan, which establishes the phasing plan for the major Improvements needed to serve the RDOSP. After initiation of the Project, development will respond to market conditions and will occur in multiple phases. The Infrastructure Phasing Plan includes 10 separate development phasing areas, all of which can be developed independently of each other and in any order. The Project phasing is divided between the Master Developers and is based on the logical placement of infrastructure, utilities, and roads.
Summary of Findings
1. New EHI development is governed by the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (ARDA) (recorded on June 10, 2020), and two separate amendments to the ARDA—Amendments No 1 and No. 2.
2. Project backbone infrastructure and public facility construction requirements are identified in the ARDA (including all amendments thereto), the Financing Plan, and this Implementation Plan.
Appendix B illustrates the required EHI Backbone Infrastructure requirements by development phase in the EHI project. This Implementation ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 7
Plan includes estimated costs and potential fee program reimbursements/fee credits for those backbone infrastructure costs for EHI Phases 1 through 5.
3. City-implemented interim fees apply to the first 1,200 residential dwelling unit building permits.
Based on the terms of the ARDA, certain City-implemented development impact fees are subject to an initial incentive rate that applies only to the first 1,200 residential dwelling units. These Incentive Fees apply to any development in the Project regardless of ownership. A schedule of those fees is shown in Table 6. Separately, Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA applicable to EHI, included updated interim fees applicable only to EHI Phase 1 development. The interim fees applicable to EHI Phase 1 development are also illustrated in Table 6.
4. The City is constructing White Rock Road subject to the terms in the ARDA, and subsequent ARDA amendments.
Based on the terms of the ARDA and applicable amendments thereto, the City is taking lead construction responsibility for White Rock Road improvements generally from Luyung Drive to ½-mile east of Rancho Cordova Parkway. EHI has a cost-share obligation for certain portions of roadway and related drainage facility costs. The estimated costs of that arrangement are identified in this document.
5. EHI is not implementing a Plan Area Fee Program over their portion of the Project as outlined in the RDOSP Public Facilities Financing Plan.
Although the original Financing Plan assumed a Plan Area Fee Program would be implemented, EHI has decided not to form a Plan Area Fee. Instead, all required infrastructure that is not fully covered by an existing fee program will be privately financed or constructed directly by master developers.
6. Project backbone infrastructure obligations are not subject to costsharing agreements.
The estimated backbone infrastructure costs identified in this document are exclusive and apply only to EHI property, except where noted. For the most part, the Master Developers will construct the backbone infrastructure related to each of their own property holdings, with very little cost-sharing between them. As noted herein, there are limited exceptions to this arrangement, such as storm drainage infrastructure.
7. Project public facility obligations are not subject to cost-sharing agreements.
The estimated public facility costs identified in this document are exclusive and apply only to EHI property, except where noted. For the most part, the Master Developers will construct the public facilities related to each of their own property holdings, with very little cost-sharing between them. Relatedly, the Master Developers would be subject to all applicable City and other ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
8 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
agencies fees for public facility obligations. Again, there may be limited exceptions to this arrangement.
8. EHI park obligations are addressed in a Park Development Agreement between EHI and CRPD.
EHI obligations for park land dedication, rough grading, and park development for neighborhood park (at EHI’s election) is documented in the Park Development Agreement executed between EHI and CRPD.
9. EHI environmental mitigation obligations are addressed in a costsharing agreement between EHI and AR/EDC.
EHI and AR/EDC have entered into a Cost Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement (Cost Sharing Agreement) related to environmental mitigation costs. This agreement is a private agreement between private parties and does not involve the City. A summary of this agreement is included in this Implementation Plan because the Project phases of development are contingent on compliance with required environmental mitigation.
10.EHI and AR/EDC drainage facility obligations are mutually exclusive, except for one drainage channel and outfall that may require costsharing arrangements.
The Project includes one large storm drainage channel and associated storm drainage basins located in EHI’s Phase 3 and 4 that may be sized to accommodate drainage runoff from development in both EHI and AR/EDC properties. As such, when construction of those storm drainage channel and basin improvements are required by new EHI or AR/EDC development, the parties have mutually agreed to discuss potential cost-sharing arrangements for the storm drainage improvements. At this time, there are no binding agreements that require cost sharing for those storm drainage improvements, so they may or may not become shared costs in the future.
11.EHI, AR, EDC, and any subsequent developers or builders may cooperate on land-secured financing strategies; however, one large land-secured financing district including multiple property owners is not envisioned for the overall Specific Plan land uses.
Consistent with the overall strategy articulated in this document, the Master Developers may proceed with development at their own pace independently.
Correspondingly, there are no current plans to form land-secured financing districts for infrastructure financing that include the Master Developers’ projects within the same district. While areas of the Project may annex into one or more financing districts for ongoing services and maintenance obligations, those annexations will proceed independently.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
Summary of Project Entitlements and
Agreements
Policy Framework Overview
This chapter provides an overview of the RDOSP policy framework related to this Implementation Plan, including the following elements:
Tier 1 and Tier 2 Entitlements.
Phasing.
Financing Plan Overview.
Development Agreement and ARDA.
ARDA Amendments.
Park Development Agreement.
Cost Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement.
The Project is being processed in two separate phases or “Tiers” of development approvals for the Master Developers. The Tier 1 Entitlements were approved by the City on September 7, 2010 and included a Tier 1 Development Agreement for the Master Developers, the Specific Plan document, and the Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The two Tier 1 Development Agreements are nearly identical, except that one applies to EHI’s property and one applies to EDC’s property.
The Tier 1 Development Agreements vest the RDOSP and committed the City to consider future approval of the land uses and other details in the Specific Plan document. In the Tier 1 Development Agreements, the City agreed the Specific Plan document essentially is the blueprint for development, and the City and developers will both work toward the development it describes.
The Specific Plan document established the land plan (zoning map) and zoning regulations for development in the approximately 3,830-acre Project area. The Specific Plan document includes information about Project objectives, relation to other City documents, setting and surroundings, land use and circulation, environmental resources, public utilities, public services, and implementation. The Specific Plan Appendix includes the Rio del Oro Development Standards and Design Guidelines and the On-Site Infrastructure Phasing Master Plan.
Both parties agreed that before any Tier 2 Entitlements are approved, including the Tier 2 Development Agreements, and before physical development would be allowed, all developers in the Project area would agree to the Financing Plan, Phasing Master Plan, Affordable Housing Plan, and overall Project conditions of approval.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
10 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Tier 1 and Tier 2 Entitlements
Development in the Project will be governed by a series of development entitlements between the City and the developers. A multiple-tier approach to entitlement execution establishes the conditions of and mitigation measures for Project development. Because the initial limited entitlement did not include overall Project conditions and financing, there were to be multiple phases (Tiers) of development entitlements as follows:
Tier 1 Entitlements (approved by the City on August 5, 2010). The Tier 1 entitlement process included approval of the Specific Plan document, EIR, and a Tier 1 Development Agreement with identical terms for the Master Developers. The Tier 1 Development Agreement explained Tier 1 and Tier 2 processing in additional detail. The Tier 1 Development Agreements included as an exhibit the Large Lot Tentative Maps that serve as the basis for the land use plan described in the Specific Plan document. A corresponding amendment to the Aerojet Special Planning Area (SPA), which was previously approved by Sacramento County, was also approved by the City in 2010. Tier 2 Entitlements. The Tier 2 entitlement process was completed by the City and Master Developers between 2016 and 2020. The Financing Plan was approved concurrent with the Specific Plan document. Tier 2 entitlements included additional specific plan master planning, financing planning, and phasing planning for the Project. AR/EDC and EHI (or respective successors in interest, as provided for in the Tier 1 Development Agreements) each separately exercised their discretion to apply for a Tier 2 Development Agreement for its portion of the Specific Plan area at any time during the term of its Tier 1 Development Agreement.
Phasing
The Specific Plan document provides for a planned infrastructure system with coordinated phasing and construction of facilities. A total of 10 phases are proposed in the RDOSP. The On-Site Infrastructure Phasing Plan is provided in Appendix B, which includes a listing, by phase, of improvements and specific details relating to those improvements.
Infrastructure requirements for each phase of development include all on-site infrastructure necessary for each phase to proceed. The City approved a comprehensive Phasing Plan Master Plan as part of the Tier 2 Entitlement. The City will require, through map conditions, those off-site improvements necessary or beneficial in conjunction with a particular phase of development. Before approval of a small lot tentative map, the developer shall provide a phasing plan addressing sequencing and full buildout of all internal streets depicted on the tentative map. The phasing plan will also detail the timing of any required off-site infrastructure.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 11
Financing Plan Summary
Purpose and Goals of the Financing Plan
The Financing Plan identified the plan to finance the Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities required to serve the RDOSP, subject to the terms and conditions of the Tier 2 entitlements, including the Tier 2 Development Agreements. The Financing Plan was prepared based on the following principles:
1. Establish the policy framework for financing the required Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities.
2. Specify the Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities to be constructed.
3. Identify the distribution of cost burdens to the different land uses in the RDOSP.
4. Identify funding sources to pay for the Backbone Infrastructure improvements and Public Facilities.
5. Describe fee programs and possible financing districts.
6. Describe funding sources and financing districts for ongoing operations and maintenance.
Please see Appendix A for more detail regarding the Financing Plan guiding principles as originally articulated in the Project Specific Plan document.
Development Agreement and ARDA
The City and property owners had originally entered into a Tier 1 Development Agreement (Tier 1 DA) for the Project. Among other obligations, that Tier 1 DA required the parties, before development in the Project, to prepare and execute a Tier 2 DA. As described below, the City and EHI executed an ARDA that satisfied the obligation for a Tier 2 DA.
In June 2020, the City and EHI entered into an ARDA that granted certain rights and sets forth certain obligations for each party relative to development and implementation of the Project. Only those provisions that relate to financial or infrastructure construction are summarized in this Implementation Plan.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
12 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Purpose of the ARDA
The following language, which describes the purpose of the ARDA, is excerpted from the ARDA:
The City and Landowner desire to provide greater certainty and clarity to matters that are common, necessary and
essential for the development of the Property in the Specific Plan Area (as defined herein [in the ARDA]), including but not limited to dedication of open space and land for public facilities, financing and construction of required
infrastructure, as well as the contribution and
reimbursement of the facilities’ costs and services by and amongst Landowner and other landowners in the Specific
Plan Area, and its successors-in-interest. Additionally, Landowner desires to proceed with development consistent with the Entitlements or any Subsequent Entitlements that may be included within the scope of this ARDA as those
terms are defined herein. As contemplated and required by the Agreement, prior to any development being approved
for or occurring within the Property (including any approval of Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Maps (as defined herein) or grading or construction of any improvements within or serving the Property), Landowner must obtain approval
from the City of a Tier 2 Development Agreement (as
defined in the Agreement). This ARDA is intended to
replace the Agreement, implement the requirements of the Entitlements and the Specific Plan EIR/EIS (as defined
herein) as applied to development of the Property, and
satisfy the condition for a Tier 2 Development Agreement prior to development of the Property. (emphasis added).
As noted, the ARDA satisfied the prior Tier 1 DA condition that a Tier 2 DA be prepared such that the ARDA superseded and replaced the prior Tier 1 DA. Among other vested rights and obligations of the property owner, as well as of the City, the ARDA included certain “Incentive Fees” in its Section 5.7.1.
ARDA Section 5.7.1 created an incentive period, of up to 7 years from the ARDA effective date or the issuance of 1,200 residential building permits, in which certain fees, as identified in ARDA Exhibit E, would be in effect at lower-thantypical rates. During the incentive period, the incentive fees would also not be subject to inflationary adjustments. The incentive period and special rates applied to the following fees:
Community Places Fee.
Library Fee.
Park Development Fee.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 13
Transportation Fee.
Park Renovation Fee.
Affordable Housing Fee.
As described in more detail below and later in this Implementation Plan, subsequent amendments to the ARDA have amended the rights, applicability, and adjustments to the “incentive period exactions” originally created in ARDA Section 5.7.1.
First Amendment of ARDA By and Between the City and Alta Vista, LLC, Relative to the Project
Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA, which was specifically identified as only applying to the subset of the EHI property identified as Phase 1 (approved November 2019, recorded April 2020), was established to achieve the following outcomes:
Reduce certain nexus-based development impact fees on an interim basis (as adjusted over time).
Confirm EHI obligation to dedicate park and community places lands. Specify EHI is required to pay the City’s Park Development Fee, Community Places Fee, and City Community Renovation Fee (as adjusted over time). Reduce the required City Affordable Housing Fee to $3,700 per market-rate residential unit (as adjusted over time).
Identify City and EHI construction and cost responsibility for White Rock Road improvements.
Second Amendment of ARDA By and Between the City and Alta Vista, LLC, Relative to the Project
Amendment No. 2 to the ARDA (September 2021) clarified the EHI property subject to the ARDA and specifically revised the respective obligations for drainage improvements along Sunrise Boulevard and White Rock Road. The EHI obligation for Sunrise Boulevard drainage improvements is $900,000, payable in multiple increments as triggered, and the White Rock Road roadway and signal improvement costs from Parkway to Collector A shall be reimbursed by EHI to the City in an amount equal to 122.5 percent of the reasonable hard construction costs for certain improvements as identified in the ARDA. Similar EHI reimbursement obligations for drainage improvements associated with that same roadway segment are to be reimbursed by EHI to the City.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
14 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Park Development Agreement between
Cordova Recreation and Park District
and Alta Vista, LLC
In autumn of 2021, EHI (under the entity name “Alta Vista, LLC”) recorded a park development agreement (Park DA) between Alta Vista, LLC, and the Cordova Recreation and Park District (Park District) that established EHI’s obligations for park land dedication, park construction, and payment of park development impact fees. The following sections summarize the Park DA terms applicable to the EHI project.
Park Land Dedication
The Park DA established the following park land dedications for the EHI project:
Park land dedications shall be satisfied by dedication of lands identified in Exhibit 7-1 of the Specific Plan document.
Park land dedications shall be satisfied on a specific plan areawide basis and not on a project-by-project basis.
Developer (EHI) shall provide an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for 3 neighborhood park sites depicted in the Park DA Exhibit 1, for a total of
15.5 acres of park land.
Developer shall dedicate 64.3 acres of park land to the Park District for a portion of the Community Park site (depicted in Park DA Exhibit 1).
If, in the future, changes in land uses in the EHI project require additional park land as compared to what has been dedicated, any increase in park land dedication requirement may be satisfied by payment of an in-lieu fee to the Park District rather than through dedication of additional park land.
Park Development Impact Fees
The Park DA establishes the park development impact fee applicable to EHI Phase 1 and an “interim” incentive rate for the first 1,200 units in the entire Specific Plan area as follows:
The Phase 1 park development fee shall be $9,781.36 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU), with inflationary adjustments consistent with Section 5.7.1 of the ARDA.
Except as described immediately above, the park development fee shall be $8,998 per EDU without inflationary adjustment, either until construction of 1,200 units in the entire Specific Plan area or until October 19, 2023, whichever occurs first.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
Park development fees should be allocated as follows: 33 percent for neighborhood parks component, 53 percent for community parks component, 11 percent for districtwide parks component, and 3 percent for administration component.
The neighborhood parks component shall be used exclusively to provide credits to fund neighborhood parks construction and improvements. According to Section 2.3.1 of the PDA, the turnkey credit for neighborhood parks is based on the Neighborhood Park Fee Component equal to the construction cost per acre used to calculate the allocation set forth in Section 2.2, multiplied by the number of neighborhood park acres constructed. EHI’s portion of the RDOSP contains 15.5 acres of neighborhood parks for a total neighborhood park budget in EHI’s ownership of $7,924,605 or $511,265 per acre (2021$). The developer and CRPD will determine the actual budget for each neighborhood park at conceptual design phase to be flexible within 5 percent of the budget between the neighborhood parks, as long as the total amount expended for all neighborhood parks does not exceed $7,924,605.
The community park and districtwide park fee components shall be used exclusively to fund community park construction and improvements. EHI (or successor in interest in Park DA) may obtain credits against the neighborhood park fee component if EHI (or subsequent developer) constructs neighborhood parks for dedication to the Park District. Terms of how such credits would be calculated are articulated in the Park DA. The Park DA also includes provisions for Park District construction of neighborhood parks in the event EHI (or its successor) does not elect to construct neighborhood parks on a turnkey basis.
Street Frontage, Rough Grading, and Schedule
The Park DA also includes the following conditions:
EHI (or successor) is responsible for all costs associated with the design, engineering, fees, permits, and construction of street frontage improvements adjacent to neighborhood parks. Street frontage improvements are not eligible for park development impact fee credits.
If EHI (or successor) elects not to construct neighborhood parks on a turnkey basis, neighborhood park rough grading shall be commenced before issuance of 51 percent of the certificates of occupancy in the applicable project phase that includes such neighborhood park.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
16 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
EHI (or successor) shall commence rough grading of the community park site in the following phases:
— Community park phase 1 (approximately 20 acres) when construction of 30 percent of the planned units in EHI Phase 2 are completed. — Community park phase 2 (approximately 20 acres) when construction of 60 percent of the planned units in EHI Phase 2 are completed. — Community park phase 3 (approximately 20 acres) when construction of 90 percent of the planned units in EHI Phase 2 are completed. If necessary, either party to the agreement may postpone the rough grading requirements for neighborhood parks or the community park.
Other Park DA Provisions
The Park DA includes the following provisions, each of which are more fully described in the document:
EHI (or successor) shall have full discretion to develop neighborhood parks on a turnkey basis.
EHI (or successor) shall fully satisfy community park obligation by completion of rough grading, street frontage, and payment of the community park component of the park development impact fee.
EHI (or successor) shall be required to annex the EHI project into the Park District’s Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 2018-01 to fund EHI’s share of park maintenance costs.
Cost Sharing and Reimbursement
Agreement
Separate from agreements between EHI and public agencies or entities, EHI entered into a Cost Sharing Agreement with AR/EDC related to RDOSP combined environmental mitigation costs. This section briefly summarizes the main elements of that Cost Sharing Agreement.
Through the ARDA, Project conditions of approval, and conditions of other entitlements (i.e., environmental permits), EHI and AR/EDC collectively are responsible for certain “combined” environmental mitigation obligations and costs.
Because the parties each have responsibility to ensure the required conditions are met, the parties entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement to specify obligations of the two parties relative to one another. The Cost Sharing Agreement sets forth land dedication and conservation easement requirements, as well as the ability for any aspect of the development project to move forward in any sequence regardless of a designated development “phase.”
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 17
The agreement also includes certain reimbursement provisions meant as “mechanisms to achieve an ultimate fair share cost allocation for any monies advanced by either party that had to be advanced under the environmental mitigation requirements of the …. (environmental permits or ARDA).” For clarity, the agreement identifies three categories of combined environmental mitigation costs into the following categories:
1. EHI-funded Phase 1 Mitigation Costs.
2. Future “shared” mitigation costs—with uncertain timing.
3. Non-shared future individual mitigation costs for which each party is individually responsible.
Exhibit C to the Cost Sharing Agreement sets forth the estimated “fair share” obligation for combined environmental mitigation obligations for each party.
Below is a summary of the fair share items included in Exhibit C of the Cost Sharing Agreement.
EHI-Funded Phase 1 Mitigation
EHI funded the wetland preserve endowment for the 510-acre onsite wetland preserve (including the 12-acre onsite valley elderberry bush (VELB) preserve.
EHI also purchased 7.24 vernal pool credits and 5.6 seasonal wetland credits from the Clay Station Conservation Bank for approximately $3,973,800. Finally, EHI funded a 160-acre offsite Cook Preserve Endowment for approximately $915,000.
All together, the EHI-funded Phase 1 mitigation costs equal approximately $6.62 million.
The Cost Sharing Agreement establishes a 50/50 cost sharing arrangement for these costs and identifies the specific triggers applicable to actions by AR/EDC that would trigger repayment of their fair share of the EHI-funded Phase 1 mitigation costs.
Estimated Remaining Shared Mitigation Costs
Cost Sharing Agreement Exhibits B and C document approximately $2.2 million in additional future shared mitigation costs, for which the timing is uncertain and contingent on the timing of development in the Specific Plan area. If one party triggers the need for some or all of the costs within the $2.2 million, that party may elect to pay the full cost with the cost-sharing agreement, requiring the other party to fund their 50 percent fair share allocation.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
18 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Estimated Remaining Non-Shared Mitigation Costs
Cost Sharing Agreement Exhibits B and C also document additional “non-shared” mitigation requirements and costs related to subsequent wetland construction and ongoing endowment funding related thereto applicable to each party. The obligation to each party for their own wetland construction obligations in the 510-acre preserve is roughly estimated at approximately $0.5 million each but is subject to change. In addition, each party would separately be responsible for costs for ongoing monitoring and maintenance obligations, transplanting of elderberry shrubs, and the monitoring of such, as well as the cost to construct and maintain drainage corridors located on each party’s respective property.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 19
Project and EHI Land Uses
Project Land Uses
As shown in Table 1, the Project includes land uses under the Master Developers’ ownership and in several phases for each. The following sections briefly describe the land uses in the Project. The Master Developers may proceed with development in that portion of the Project under their control without being dependent on the other.
EHI Land Uses
As shown in Table 1, the EHI land uses are divided into 5 distinct phases, identified as Phases 1 through 5. Phase 1 development has commenced, thereby driving the desire for this document. Phase 1 is composed of approximately 444 low-density single-family dwelling units, 132 medium-density single-family dwelling units, and approximately 300 high-density units, for a total of 876 dwelling units.
Overall, the EHI phases are entitled for up to 5,119 dwelling units, composed of 2,720 low-density single-family units, 955 medium-density single-family units, and 1,444 high-density residential units. In addition, Phases 1 through 5 are permitted for approximately 337.7 acres of nonresidential development with
99.3 acres designated as local and regional town center, 10.1 acres of village commercial, and another 228.3 acres divided between business park and industrial park.
Easton Development Land Uses
While not a part of this Implementation Plan, Table 1 does include approximately 7,005 planned dwelling units and approximately 179.6 acres of nonresidential acreage planned for development.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
20 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 21
EHI Infrastructure Costs, Phasing, and
Fee Burdens
Implementation Plan Infrastructure
Definitions
The term “Backbone Infrastructure” often is used to describe all publicly owned facilities. Similar to the Financing Plan, this Implementation Plan uses the following definitions to more precisely define these items:
Backbone Infrastructure: This term includes most of the essential public service-based items that are underground or on the surface. These items include storm drainage, water, reclaimed water, sewer, and arterial roads.2 Backbone Infrastructure is sized to serve numerous individual development projects in the Project and in some cases serves the broader region’s development areas.
Public Facilities: This term includes these public facilities:
— Quimby parks, community places, green infrastructure, and trails. — Transit.
— Fire stations.
— Libraries.
— Other City Community Facilities.
— Schools.
This group of items provides amenities to the Project (e.g., park facilities and libraries) or houses employees providing services to the area (e.g., fire stations).
2 Arterial roads are major 4-lane streets, typically on an 84’ ROW with turning lanes.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
22 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Improvements: This term is used generically in the Financing Plan to include a combination of Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities when a precise breakdown is not required.
Subdivision Infrastructure: This group of improvements includes a subset of roadway improvements and in-tract improvements:
— Road Frontage on Backbone Infrastructure Roadways: Road frontage improvements are defined as the outside traffic lane; curb, gutter, sidewalk, bike lane, required frontage landscaping, joint utilities trench, street lighting, and associated water, sewer, and drainage utilities.
Road frontage is not generally considered Backbone Infrastructure, but this Financing Plan does identify the cost of road frontage for Backbone Infrastructure Roadways. This Implementation Plan identifies that private capital or other mechanisms will be used to fund these improvements, and installation of road frontage improvements will be the responsibility of adjacent development.
— Certain Collector Roads: Collector roads are 2-lane roads carrying local traffic to or from arterials. Collector roads are not generally considered Backbone Infrastructure, but this Implementation Plan includes certain unnamed local collector roads that are wider than the typical cross section and are separated from adjacent development by soundwalls. Collector roads are not covered by the City traffic development impact fee (TDIF), and private capital or other mechanisms will be used to fund these improvements.
— In-Tract Improvements include infrastructure and utilities (e.g., storm drainage, sewer, water, roads, soundwalls, and dry utilities) in an individual subdivision, commercial project, or multifamily project.
Items Excluded from the Implementation Plan
The following items are specifically excluded from the Implementation Plan:
1. The cost of In-Tract Improvements, which will be funded privately by developers.
2. The cost of right-of-way for roads, which will be dedicated, either as provided in the Development Agreement or on any Large Lot Final Map.
3. Other land dedication, right-of-way (excluding roads), and easement costs (e.g., park land dedication).
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 23
EHI Backbone Infrastructure Costs and
Public Facility Requirements
Table 2 summarizes the estimated cost of Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities for EHI Phases 1 through 5 and in total. Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities for which EHI is anticipated to have a construction responsibility were provided by Wood Rodgers, Inc., and are from May 2020. Other Public Facility costs, where fee payment will satisfy EHI’s obligations, are based on applicable fees current as of January 2022.3 Costs for environmental mitigation reflect EHI’s applicable share of costs based on the cost-sharing agreement between EHI and AR/EDC.
Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facility Cost Detail Appendix C contains a summary of Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facility costs for the EHI development. Detailed cost estimates from Wood Rodgers, Inc., are included as Appendix D, along with exhibits depicting the segments and major increments of Backbone Infrastructure required to be completed. Developer obligations to construct required Backbone Infrastructure are triggered by conditions of approval on respective development entitlements, the DA, the Phasing Plan and this Implementation Plan.
White Rock Road Construction Costs and Obligations
Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to the ARDA address the City’s construction of certain White Rock Road improvements adjacent to the EHI property and cost obligations of the City and EHI related to those improvements. A summary of the estimated costs and cost sharing for the White Rock Road improvements is included as Appendix F. Overall, EHI’s cost obligation to the White Rock Road improvements is approximately $1.9 million. The tables and information provided in Appendix F are for reference only and do not supersede the ARDA. In case of conflict, the ARDA governs.
Sunrise Road Drainage Costs
Amendment No. 2 to the ARDA also requires EHI to fund a portion of the cost of Sunrise Road drainage improvements. EHI’s total obligation towards such drainage cost equals $900,000, payable in three separate increments of $300,000 each as certain subdivision and final small lot map recordation occurs, as more fully described in Amendment No. 2 to the ARDA. EHI has paid 2 of the 3 installments of $300,000 to the City as of adoption of this Implementation Plan and has 1 installment remaining to pay the City.
3 These fee payments satisfy EHI’s obligations only. EDC’s obligation for improvements is not satisfied by this payment.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table 2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan ImplementationDeveloper Constructed Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities Cost Summary (2021$) - Phase 1-5Item Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 TotalBackbone Infrastructure Roadways [1] $5,855,140 $16,778,380 $5,385,800 $23,077,180 $21,080,710 $72,177,210 Water $488,568 $6,619,532 $338,846 $3,194,817 $1,212,362 $11,854,125 Drainage $5,117,357 $14,500,354 $4,597,148 $5,601,079 $2,062,949 $31,878,887Sewer Interim Facilities $0 $4,333,500 $640,184 $0 $0 $4,973,684Permanent Facilities $1,361,100 $8,506,700 $964,184 $2,000,465 $8,025,774 $20,858,222Subtotal Sewer $1,361,100 $12,840,200 $1,604,367 $2,000,465 $8,025,774 $25,831,906 Subtotal Backbone Infrastructure $12,822,165 $50,738,466 $11,926,161 $33,873,541 $32,381,795 $141,742,128 Public Facilities
Quimby Parks $1,178,100 $1,247,400 $0 $1,155,000 $14,853,300 $18,433,800 Community Places/Green Infrastructure [4] $3,864,000 $1,835,998 $5,637,599 $6,528,297 $1,958,450 $19,824,344Trails $566,797 $300,300 $617,386 $730,191 $920,766 $3,135,440 Subtotal Public Facilities $5,608,897 $3,383,698 $6,254,985 $8,413,488 $17,732,516 $41,393,584Total Backbone Infrastructure & Public Facilities $18,431,062 $54,122,164 $18,181,146 $42,287,029 $50,114,311 $183,135,712Environmental Mitigation Costs [5] $6,618,378 $375,000 $2,932,040 $151,750 $151,750 $10,228,918 TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS $25,049,440 $54,497,164 $21,113,186 $42,438,779 $50,266,061 $193,364,630 cost_sum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. ECORP cost estimates provided February 2022.[5] Includes the estimated endowment costs for the Wetland Preserve and Cook Property.[6] Estimated by EPS.[2] Includes on- and off-site backbone roadway frontage improvements not covered by the City TDIF. Americanos Boulevard wetland frontage includes the median section from Centennial Drive to Douglas Road, which is creditable against the City TDIF. Frontage costs also includeoutside lanes, curb, gutter, joint trench (dry utilities), sidewalk, and streetlight improvements. [1] Includes backbone roadway improvements funded by the City TDIF. Includes only the inside (center) lanes (e.g., the inside four lanes on a six lane arterial road or the inside two lanes on a four lane arterial road) and medians. [4] If the developer constructs any of the components of the Community Places fee, the developer would receive a fee credit against the Community Places fee. The PFFP anticipated significant costs of Green Infrastructure and Trails that are not covered by any fee programthat would be in the Specific Plan Fee Program (see Tables G-1, G-4, and G-5 in the PFFP). Community Places may be creditable, butGreen Infrastructure is a developer cost [3] Includes unnamed local collector roads (travel lanes, curb, gutter, joint trench, sidewalk, and streetlight improvements) that are wider than the typical cross section and are separated from adjacent development by in-tract improvements. These collector roads are not covered by Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
24 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 25
Offsets to Fees and Reimbursement for Construction of Eligible Infrastructure
As shown and as described below, all or a portion of the estimated costs may be eligible for fee credits and reimbursements through applicable local agency development impact fee programs. Developers may be eligible to receive credits and reimbursements for certain developer-constructed improvements up to the maximum amount permitted via the applicable local agency’s fee program policies. Any portion of cost not subject to credit or reimbursement shall be the developer’s responsibility.
Costs in Excess of Public Agency Fee Credits/Reimbursements The Improvements cost estimates are based on the estimated cost to construct the required Improvements regardless of how much a public agency may reimburse, either through fee credits, future cash reimbursements, or combination thereof. In addition, the Improvements cost estimates contain items that are not eligible for public agency fee program reimbursement. Hence, there is a difference between the estimated Improvements costs and that portion of the costs that may be reimbursed to the developer (e.g., through fee credits or cash reimbursement).
The tables in Appendices C and D illustrate the estimated total Improvements costs, how much of that cost may be subject to public agency reimbursement (labeled in the tables as “credits”), and the difference between those two. Each public agency has different rules governing the way in which they permit fee credits and reimbursements, so care should be taken when evaluating the estimated credits in Appendices C and D. One should not assume all potential public agency reimbursement may take the form of fee credits.
Shared Costs or Costs Subject to Cost-Sharing/Reimbursement Known Shared Costs
As described earlier, there are approximately $2.2 million in future wetland mitigation costs that will be shared 50/50 between EHI and AR/EDC pursuant to the terms of the Cost Sharing Agreement. If one party elects to fund all or a portion of these costs, that party would be entitled to reimbursement from the other party for one half of the costs.
Potential Future Shared Costs
Most of the storm drainage infrastructure in the Specific Plan area serves adjacent development areas, and the improvements are mutually exclusive between EHI and AR/EDC. However, there is one large storm drainage channel and an associated storm drainage basin located in EHI’s Phase 3 and 4 that may be sized to accommodate drainage runoff from development in both EHI and a portion of AR/EDC properties. As such, when construction of those storm drainage channel ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
26 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
and basin improvements are required by new EHI or AR/EDC development, the parties have mutually agreed to discuss potential cost-sharing arrangements for the storm drainage improvements. At this time, there are no binding agreements that require cost sharing for those storm drainage improvements, so they may or may not become shared costs in the future.
Infrastructure an d Public Facility
Phasing
Infrastructure and public facility phasing and requirements for the EHI property are governed by the following documents:
Financing Plan.
Infrastructure Phasing Master Plan (in Financing Plan). ARDA.
Park DA.
Cost Sharing Agreement.
Small Lot Tentative Map Conditions of Approval.
Implementation Plan (this document).
The exhibits in Appendix B and the cost estimates in Appendix D depict and quantify the infrastructure and public facility phasing obligations for the EHI project. The following text from the Rio Del Oro Financing Plan Phasing Plan Master Plan (Phasing Plan Master Plan), which was appended to the Financing Plan, describes the overall approach to infrastructure and development phasing for the Specific Plan area.
Phasing Plan Overview
The Specific Plan document provides for a comprehensively planned infrastructure system with coordinated phasing and construction of facilities. A total of 10 phases are proposed in the Specific Plan area. The EHI portion of the Project consists of Phases 1 through 5. The AR/EDC portion of the Project consists of Phases A through E and the Wetland Preserve (WP). Additional sub-phases are anticipated to occur in the Plan Area as individual tentative maps are approved.
The Plan Area is bordered by existing development on the west and portions of the south and east. The phases will generally develop from west to east and north to south. The Specific Plan document’s Section 4 (Circulation) and Section 6 (Public Utilities) describe the overall public facilities required to serve the Plan Area. The following section provides a detailed listing of the infrastructure requirements to be constructed by phase in the Plan Area. Infrastructure in each phase and off site may be phased or partially constructed based on the “Phased Performance Standards” described below. Exhibit B-1 identifies the geographic boundaries of each phase with land use by phase.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 27
The Phase numbering and lettering is intended to demonstrate a high-level path to completion of infrastructure for the entire Specific Plan area. It is highly unlikely that the Project will develop in phase order. Numbers 1 through 5 and letters A through E are put in order based on a best understanding of anticipated economic drivers (infrastructure cost) and market demand conditions and the need for new homes and businesses. Each phase may be developed independent to any other phase. It is anticipated that several phases will be under construction at any given time, and the plan allows each phase to develop independently from other phases.
This on-site phasing plan is intended to provide a platform for agreements that will be developed in the Small Lot Tentative Map Phasing plans that will ultimately guide infrastructure construction in the Specific Plan area. The following performance standards and individual phase descriptions and maps provide a basis for future development. This plan is not intended to condition the order of development and does not specify the magnitude of infrastructure requirements for individual small lot tentative map phasing plans. The plan is only intended to provide a platform for the development of Small Lot Tentative Map Phasing plans where detailed infrastructure phasing conditions will be developed.
Phasing Performance Standards
The following phasing performance standards come directly from the Phasing Plan Master Plan, which was appended to the Financing Plan. As shown, the phasing performance standards inform property owners and City staff as to the criteria that will be considered when conditions of approval are constructed for each small lot tentative subdivision map.
Phasing and additional sub-phases will be permitted based on following performance standards.
Two points of roadway access will be required for any development phase. A looped water system will be required for any development phase. Interim sewer and drainage facilities may be constructed consistent with the standards of the appropriate agencies.
Arterial traffic signals identified in the RDO Specific Plan will be constructed when traffic demand/LOS and/or safety concerns require the Intersection be signalized at the discretion of the City Engineer. If any tentative lot phasing plan builds only 2 legs of a future arterial/arterial roadway intersection, signal construction will be delayed until additional approaches are built. The timing of other traffic signals identified in the RDO Specific Plan will be identified in Small Lot Tentative Map Phasing plans. Additional signals may also be considered at that time.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
28 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Arterial roadways may be phased based on providing traffic lanes sufficient to provide adequate Level of Service (LOS) consistent with the City of Rancho Cordova standards and policies. Level of service widening from 2 to 4 lanes will be based on internal arterial roadways exceeding 15,300 ADT (LOS D).
A traffic study can be provided to demonstrate that the widening is needed for development outside of the Rio Del Oro plan area.
Arterial roadway phasing will consider whether it is feasible to provide complete streets, including vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian circulation and landscaping factors for consideration include:
— Limiting the expense of construction of offsite facilities. — Limiting exposure to reconstruction of facilities due to development on opposite sides of arterial roadways adjacent to undeveloped lands, limiting the expense of construction of offside frontage.
— Financial feasibility to provide complete streets.
— Priority to provide circulation for all modes along arterial corridors, phased arterial cross section elements should be continuous within each of the 10 phases identified within this plan.
— Parcel by parcel changes in cross section elements will not be permitted. Typical cross-sections have been developed for arterial roadway phasing options for 4-lane arterials, Exhibit B-12 and 6-lane arterials, Exhibit B-13. Grade separated trail crossings are identified as constructed within each plan phase where the crossing is located. The actual timing of these crossings will be based on the development of the trail system. Conditional timing for trail crossings will be identified in the Small Lot Tentative Map Phasing Plans. EHI assumes that grade-separated pedestrian crossings for the trails are part of the City CIP, and construction of these crossings is not the responsibility of EHI.
In some instances, out of phase trails may be requested to provide logical trail connections and completeness. There will be a focus on getting residents connected to schools.
Timing for infrastructure improvements identified in this Phasing Plan will be superseded by timing requirements identified in project conditions of approval.
Minor deviations from the Infrastructure Phasing Plan may be administratively approved by the Public Works Director.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 29
Phase 1 Example
Appendix E includes several exhibits that depict the level of detail and type of infrastructure phasing that will accompany each tentative subdivision map. As shown, the exhibits include the subdivision lotting, applicable cross-sections for roadways, greenbelts, drainage corridors, etc., as well as the infrastructure phasing for the tentative map area. In this Phase 1 example, the infrastructure requirements are also depicted by subphase.
Funding Sources
Several different funding sources will be used to fund Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities required to serve the Project. Initially, the developer will be required to fund and construct many of the required Improvements with private funding until public funding becomes available. Public funding sources primarily will be used to credit the developer for the advanced funding of Improvements and to ensure development that occurs at a later time ultimately pays its proportionate share for the required Improvements.
Existing and Potential Fee Programs
The City, Sacramento County, and Other Agencies serving the RDOSP have established development impact fee programs to fund regional costs for storm drainage, sewer, water, roads, and other capital facilities.
Existing City, Sacramento County, and Other Agency fee programs that will fund a portion of RDOSP infrastructure and public facility obligations include the following programs:
Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) Zone 11A (Storm Drainage) or the Storm Drain Impact Fee when adopted by the City.
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (Regional San) (Sewer, regional conveyance).
Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD) (Sewer, local collection). Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) Sacramento County Transportation Mitigation Fee Program (SCTMFP) Measure A fee. Sacramento County (Transit).
SCWA Zone 40 (Water).
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District (SMFD) (Fire Facilities).
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
30 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Rancho Cordova Citywide Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) (Roads and Transit).4
Rancho Cordova Community Facilities Fee (CFF) Program (Library and Other City Community Facilities).
Rancho Cordova Park Renovation Fee (Park Renovations).
Other potential fees that are expected to apply to RDOSP development but that have not yet been adopted include the following programs:
Citywide Park or Cordova Recreation and Park District (CRPD) Fee Program. Rancho Cordova Community Places Fee.
Proposed Capital Southeast Connector Project Financing Program.
The existing and potential fees listed above will be paid at various entitlement stages.5 Many of the RDOSP Improvements are included in the capital improvement programs (CIPs) of these existing and potential fee programs.
In those cases, developers who build eligible Improvements would receive a credit or reimbursement from the fee program based on such credit and reimbursement policies in place at the time these improvements are completed.
Private Financing
The City will condition private developers to construct facilities needed to serve development through the subdivision map process. Commercial and multifamily projects will be conditioned through the subdivision map process, the conditional use permit process, or the design review process.
4 Pursuant to the provisions of the Public Facilities Finance Plan, adopted with the RDOSP document and the Development Agreements applicable to all properties in the RDOSP, a setaside of the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) was established at $9,000 in 2015 as a dedicated funding source to fund certain core backbone roadways. As of January 1, 2022, the set-aside amount has inflated to $10,751.24 per single-family dwelling, which amount shall be collected at building permit and not be available to be applied as credits at building permit. The creditable amount available to be applied at building permit in any given year shall be the difference between the current transportation impact fee minus the current set-aside. 5 The City Storm Drain Impact fee will be paid at the time Improvement plans are submitted to and approved by the City. SASD fees will be paid at the final map approval stage for single-family subdivisions and at the building permit stage for multifamily and commercial properties. SCWA Zone 40 single-family water fees will be paid in two increments: 15 percent before approval of an improvement plan, and the remaining balance before the issuance of a building permit or connection to a water distribution system supplied by wholesale water from SCWA. Multifamily, open space, park, and public school water fees are paid before the approval of an improvement plan. Commercial water fees will be paid in two increments: a per-acre fee at the time improvement plans are submitted to and approved by the City, and per DUE at the building permit stage. All other fees described above will be paid at building permit.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 31
Because of the scale of Backbone Infrastructure improvements required, private capital initially may be a primary source of funding. To the extent fee revenues are available, the developers will receive fee credits or reimbursements for advance funding eligible projects included in fee programs, based on the City’s, Sacramento County’s, and Other Agencies’ reimbursement policies.
Land-Secured Financing
Maintenance Districts
New development in the Project, including the EHI project, will be required to annex into several existing CFDs for ongoing services and maintenance costs.
New development will be required to annex into the following CFDs:
City CFD No. 2013-2 (Police Services).
City CFD No. 2014-2 (Streets, Lighting and Landscape Maintenance). City CFD No. 2018-2 (Community Places and Neighborhood Greens). CRPD CFD No. 2018-01 (Park Maintenance).
Transit-related services tax.
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency assessment.
Water and Drainage Studies—SCWA 13.
City of Rancho Cordova Stormwater Utility Fee Area
Infrastructure District Options
At their discretion, EHI may wish to form one or more land-secured financing districts to fund eligible Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities or to pay eligible development impact fees. Again, at EHI’s discretion, the infrastructure financing district(s) may be formed directly through the City or may be formed through one of the statewide municipal finance authorities: either the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA) Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP) or the California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) Bond Opportunities for Land Development (BOLD) Program.
Regardless under which authority the infrastructure financing district is formed, it is likely EHI would establish such district(s) consistent with the City’s goals and policies for land-secured financing.
Whether EHI elects to form one or more infrastructure financing districts on the EHI project will not have any impact on AR/EDC’s ability to form infrastructure financing districts on their portion of the Specific Plan area.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
32 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
School Facility Funding
Funding for school facilities to serve the Project will be accomplished through the following mechanisms:
School development impact fees controlled by State law (Government Code §65995 et seq.).
Folsom-Cordova Unified School District (FCUSD) School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (SFID 1).
FCUSD School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 (SFID 3). The State School Facilities Program.
Summary of Funding Sources for Development of the RDOSP As shown in Table 3, total backbone infrastructure and public facilities costs at Project buildout equal approximately $183.1 million (2021$). Including approximately $10.2 million in environmental mitigation costs, total improvement costs at Project buildout total approximately $193.4 million.6 Of these costs, $105.5 million is expected to be funded by private/other financing, and $87.9 million is expected to be funded by existing and proposed City, Sacramento County, and Other Agency fee programs.
Fees and Costs for EHI Development
The following section summarizes the estimated development impact fees and costs applicable to new EHI development. The fees and costs are shown for both a typical low-density single-family residential unit, as well as a medium-density single-family unit. Fees for high-density residential would vary from those shown for either of these two categories. As noted above, and as shown in Tables 4 and 5, new EHI development will be subject to several City and Other Agency fees. The amounts shown in these tables are the gross fee amounts before any adjustments for fee credits may be applied.
Phase 1 Development Fees and Costs
The ARDA created a subset of adjusted fees that are defined as the “Incentive Fees.” The ARDA provided that these Incentive Fees would apply until construction of 1,200 units in the entire Specific Plan area or until October 19, 2023, whichever occurs first. In the original ARDA, these Incentive Fees were not subject to any annual escalation.
6 Due to rounding, some totals may not correspond with the sum of the separate figures.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table 3
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan ImplementationSources and Uses of Funds - Phase 1-5 (2021$) Improvement
Estimated
Improvement
Costs
TDIF
Funding
Drainage
Fee
Park
Development
Fee
Community
Places Fee
Other
Agency
Funding
Total Developer
Funding Elliott Easton
Total
Funding
[1] [10] [11]
DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS
Backbone Infrastructure
Roadways $72,177,210 $27,106,660 - - $45,070,550 $45,070,550 - $72,177,210Water $11,854,125 - - - - $11,854,125 [2] - - - $11,854,125Drainage $31,878,887 - $23,095,973 - - $8,782,914 $8,782,914 t.b.d. $31,878,887 Sewer $25,831,906 - - - - $25,831,906 [3] - - - $25,831,906Subtotal Backbone Infrastructure $141,742,128 $27,106,660 $23,095,973 $0 $0 $37,686,031 $53,853,464 $53,853,464 $0 $141,742,128 Public Facilities
Quimby Parks [6] $18,433,800 - - - - $18,433,800 $18,433,800 - $18,433,800Community Places/Green Infrastructure [6] [7] $19,824,344 - - - - - $19,824,344 $19,824,344 - $19,824,344Trails $3,135,440 - - - - - $3,135,440 $3,135,440 - $3,135,440 Subtotal Public Facilities $41,393,584 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,393,584 $41,393,584 $0 $41,393,584Total Backbone Infrastructure & Public Facilities $183,135,712 $0 $23,095,973 $0 $0 $37,686,031 $50,176,498 $50,176,498 $0 $110,958,502Environmental Mitigation Costs [9] $10,228,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,228,918 $10,228,918 TOTAL DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS $193,364,630 $27,106,660 $23,095,973 $0 $0 $37,686,031 $105,475,966 $95,247,048 $0 $193,364,630 bo su
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. ECORP cost estimates provided February 2022.[1] The sources of Other Agency Fee funding include:
[2] Sacramento County Zone 40.[3] SASD.[4] Folsom Cordova USD.[5] Sacramento Metro Fire Department. [6] Assumes cost is equal to fee revenue generated by Rio Del Oro development.[8] Facilities funded by CFF revenue include city hall, police facilities, community center, corporation yard, museum, parking structure, and administration (3.75%).[9] Includes the estimated endowment costs for the wetland preserve and Cook property. [11] Private/other funding may include private developer capital, Mello-Roos Community Facilities District, Benefit Assessment District, or other Infrastructure charge.[10] Financing mechanism for remaining Rio Del Oro infrastructure costs has not been determined at this time. Special Financing District may be private developer capital, Mello-Roos Community Facilities District, Plan Area Fee Program, Benefit Assessment District, or other Infrastructure charge.
RDOSP Phase 1-5
Proposed Funding Sources
Existing City, County, Other Fee/Funding Programs Developer Funded City Fees
[7] If the developer constructs any of the components of the Community Places fee, the developer would receive a fee credit against the Community Places fee. The PFFP anticipated significant costs of Green Infrastructure and Trails that are not covered by any fee program that would be in the Specific Plan Fee Program (see Tables G-1, G-4, and G-5 in the PFFP). Community Places may be creditable, but Green Infrastructure is a developer cost Relative obligation between parties is t.b.d.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
33 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table 4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Single-Family Impact and Processing Fees
Item
Fee per
Unit Agency
Current as of Feb-22
CITY/COUNTY/SPECIAL DISTRICT FEES PER UNIT [1]
Processing Fees per Unit [2]
Building Permit [3] $1,969 City
Plan Check [3] $1,313 City
C&D Ordinance Fee $122 City
Zone Check Fee $171 City
General Plan Cost Recovery $210 City
Building Compliance Inspection Fee - City
California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) Fee $13 City Strong Motion Instrumentation Fee $41 City
Sacramento Metro Fire District Plan Review Fee $629 Special District Subtotal Processing Fees per Unit $4,467
Development Impact Fees per Unit
Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD) Sewer Impact Fee (Expansion) [4] $2,586 Special District Regional SAN Impact Fee (New Areas) $6,479 Special District Zone 40 Water Development Fee $17,985 County
Zone 40 Water Meter New Service Processing Fee $376 County Storm Drainage Fee $2,551 City
Sacramento County Transportation Mitigation Fee (Measure A) $1,351 County Transportation Impact Fee [5] [6] $18,267 City
Affordable Housing Fee [5] $4,270 City
Community Facilities Fee - Community Facilities [5] $3,582 City Community Facilities Fee - Library [5] $637 City
Community Places Fee [5] $1,488 City
Park Renovation Fee [5] $778 City
Park Development Fee [7] $6,137 City
Sacramento Regional Transit Fee $175 Special District
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District Facilities Fee $1,477 Special District Subtotal Development Impact Fees per Unit $68,139
TOTAL CITY/COUNTY/SPECIAL DISTRICT FEES PER UNIT $72,606 School District Folsom Cordova USD
Estimated School Mitigation per Unit
A. Annual School Mello-Roos CFD Tax -
B. Present Value of School CFD Tax -
C. School Fee per Sq. Ft. $6.33 -
D. Total School Fee per Unit $15,192 School District
E. Total School Mitigation (B+D) $15,192
TOTAL FEES (PROCESSING/IMPACT/SCHOOL DISTRICT) PER UNIT $87,798 sfr fees
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; various agencies; EPS.
[2] Processing fees exclude mechanical, electrical, plumbing and other similar review fees. [3] Total permit fee is $1,750 plus 0.007 * valuation exceeding $100,000. [4] SASD Fee is calculated at $20,484 per acre, applied only to the residential lot area. [1] Based on a single-family residence of 2,400 square feet (SF) on a 5,500 SF lot at a density of 5.50 units per net acre with a construction permit valuation of $318,788.
[6] Pursuant to the provisions of the PFFP adopted with the RDOSP and the Development Agreements applicable to all properties in the RDOSP, a set-aside of the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) was established in 2015 as a dedicated funding source to fund certain core backbone roadways. The creditable amount available to be applied at building permit in any given year shall be the difference between the current transportation impact fee minus the current set-aside. [5] Reflects Incentive Fees from the First Amendment to the Development Agreement. See Table 6 for [7] Park Development Fee reflects elimination of the neighborhood park component because neighborhood parks are being developer constructed in lieu of that portion of the fee.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table 5
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Medium-Density Residential Impact and Processing Fees
Item
Fee per
Unit Agency
Current as of Jan-22
CITY/COUNTY/SPECIAL DISTRICT FEES PER UNIT [1]
Processing Fees per Unit [2]
Building Permit [3] $1,609 City
Plan Check [3] $1,073 City
C&D Ordinance Fee $100 City
Zone Check Fee $139 City
General Plan Cost Recovery $153 City
Building Compliance Inspection Fee - City
California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) Fee $9 City Strong Motion Instrumentation Fee $30 City
Sacramento Metro Fire Department Plan Review Fee $524 Special District Subtotal Processing Fees per Unit $3,638
Development Impact Fees per Unit
Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD) Sewer Impact Fee (Expansion) [4] $1,348 Special District Regional SAN Impact Fee (New Areas) $6,479 Special District Zone 40 Water Development Fee $17,985 County
Zone 40 Water Meter New Service Processing Fee $376 County Storm Drainage Fee $1,615 City
Sacramento County Transportation Mitigation Fee (Measure A) $1,351 County Transportation Impact Fee [5] [6] $18,267 City
Affordable Housing Fee [5] $4,270 City
Community Facilities Fee - Community Facilities [5] $3,582 City Community Facilities Fee - Library [5] $637 City
Community Places Fee [5] $1,488 City
Park Renovation Fee [5] $778 City
Park Development Fee [7] $6,137 City
Sacramento Regional Transit Fee $175 Special District
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District Facilities Fee $1,477 Special District Subtotal Development Impact Fees per Unit $65,965
TOTAL CITY/COUNTY/SPECIAL DISTRICT FEES PER UNIT $69,603 School District Folsom-Cordova USD
Estimated School Mitigation per Unit
A. Annual School Mello-Roos CFD Tax -
B. Present Value of School CFD Tax -
C. School Fee per Sq. Ft. $6.33
D. Total School Fee per Unit $10,761 School District
E. Total School Mitigation (B+D) $10,761
TOTAL FEES (PROCESSING/IMPACT/SCHOOL DISTRICT) PER UNIT $80,364 mdr fees
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; various agencies; EPS.
[2] Processing fees exclude mechanical, electrical, plumbing and other similar review fees. [3] Total permit fee is $1,750 plus 0.007 * valuation exceeding $100,000. [4] SASD Fee is calculated at $20,484 per acre, applied only to the residential lot area. [1] Based on a 1,700 square-foot single-family unit with 15.2 units per acre, 2,872 square feet of lot area per unit, and a construction permit valuation of $233,143.
[5] Reflects Incentive Fees from the First Amendment to the Development Agreement. See Table 6 for further details.
[7] Park Development Fee reflects elimination of the neighborhood park component because neighborhood parks are being developer constructed in lieu of that portion of the fee. [6] Pursuant to the provisions of the PFFP adopted with the RDOSP and the Development Agreements applicable to all properties in the RDOSP, a set-aside of the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) was established in 2015 as a dedicated funding source to fund certain core backbone roadways. The creditable amount available to be applied at building permit in any given year shall be the difference between the current transportation impact fee minus the current set-aside.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
36 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA
Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA amended the Incentive Fees applicable specifically to EHI Phase 1 development and reinstated an annual escalation factor to be applied to the Incentive Fees for EHI Phase 1.
Because this Implementation Plan describes the plan for EHI development, the amounts shown in Tables 4 and 5 reflect the Incentive Fees as implemented by Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA. The specific Incentive Fees applicable to EHI Phase 1 development are shown in the left-most column in Table 6 (in 2022 $).
Additional Incentive Fees
While Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA adjusted certain Incentive Fees applicable to EHI Phase 1, the original Incentive Fees in the ARDA would be applicable to any remaining EHI development or Project development (subject to the cumulative 1,200 dwelling unit or time period ceiling/duration). The Incentive Fees from the original ARDA are displayed in the middle column of Table 6. The following 2 scenarios describe the applicability of the original Incentive Fees, which are not subject to any annual adjustments.
First, consider the circumstance where no building permits were issued in EHI Phase 1, and Aerojet Phase A was to move forward with new vertical development. Notwithstanding the time period expiration, in this example, any Aerojet Phase A dwelling units would be subject to the Incentive Fees (up to a total of 1,200 dwelling units).
Next, consider the example where EHI’s Phase 1 low- and medium-density residential is fully completed and the total 576 dwelling units are constructed.
Then, if EHI were to proceed with Phase 2 development, there would be 624 dwelling units (1,200 less Phase 1’s 576 units) that would be subject to the Incentive Fees.
Expiration of Incentive Fees
As described in the ARDA, after 7 years from the effective date of the ARDA or 1,200 dwelling units, the incentive period would terminate, and the Incentive Fees would no longer be applicable. For reference, the right-most column in Table 6 shows the 2022 equivalent of these fees if the Incentive Fee had expired.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table 6
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Development Agreement-Based Fee Schedule
Fee Category
Elliott
Phase 1
RDO
Incentive Fee
Current Standard
City Fees
Applicability expires Dec. 4, 2034
expires 1,200 units or Oct.
19, 2023 whichever first
occurs No Incentive
Community Places Fee $1,488.42 $1,257.00 $1,641.89
Community Renovation Fee [1] $777.75 $0.00 $1,291.09
Park Development Fee [2] $6,137.21 $8,998.00 $11,473.50 Transportation Fee $18,266.69 $15,176.00 $19,299.32
Community Facilities Fee $3,581.95 $3,475.19 $3,753.21
CFF Library Fee $636.71 $424.00 $768.72
Affordable Housing Fee $4,269.80 $4,557.00 $6,264.48
Total Development Agreement Fees $35,158.53 $33,887.19 $44,492.21 da fees
[2] Park Development Fee (Phase 1) reflects elimination of the neighborhood park component because neighborhood parks are being developer constructed in lieu of that portion of the fee.
Source: City of Rancho Cordova, January 2022
[1] Community Renovation Fee has previously been referred to as Park Renovation Fee.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
37 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Report: Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Implementation Plan—Elliott Homes, Inc.
March 2022
38 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDICES:
Appendix A: Guiding Principles for Funding
Backbone Road Infrastructure
Appendix B: Infrastructure Phasing Plan
Appendix C: EPS Summary of Infrastructure
Costs and Credits
Appendix D: Detailed Infrastructure
Costs and Credits
Appendix E: Phase I Project Phasing Example
Appendix F: White Rock Road Cost Detail
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDIX A:
Guiding Principles for
Funding Backbone Road Infrastructure
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-1
Specific Plan Document Guiding
Principles for Financing (Edited)
This section presents the Guiding Principles for Financing defined in Section 8.5.1 in the Specific Plan document, with minor clarifying edits.7 This Implementation Plan is consistent with these Guiding Principles. This section eliminates the paragraph numbering used in the Specific Plan document but maintains the paragraph and section title.
Guiding Principles
A set of Guiding Principles defines the “rules” regarding the funding and construction of infrastructure and the phasing of development within the Specific Plan area. These rules clarify the approach for developing required infrastructure as each project or tentative subdivision map moves forward.
Development in the RDOSP shall be consistent with the following policies, which will be incorporated as Conditions of Approval for Tier 2 Entitlements and Subsequent Entitlements.
Responsibility for Infrastructure Funding
Development within the RDOSP shall pay the full costs of infrastructure needed to serve the Specific Plan area, except where other funding sources are appropriate and available. Amounts over and above the developer’s fair share will be reimbursed/credited after subsequent developers pay their fair share of the full costs of infrastructure, as detailed in the Tier 2 Entitlements (Development Agreements or Conditions of Approval).
The Financing Plan and the Tier 2 Entitlements will address issues associated with timing of financing and construction, fee credits and reimbursement for developers who install public facilities.
Timing of Infrastructure Funding
The Financing Plan shall provide a strategy for funding backbone infrastructure and community facilities consistent with the timing set forth in the Infrastructure Phasing Master Plan, the Tier 2 Entitlements, and these Guiding Principles.
Developers within the RDOSP shall be required to construct, or pay for the construction of, public improvements as needed pursuant to the approved phasing plans.
7 The edits are delineated by underlined text where language was added and strikethrough text when language was deleted. Eliminated text is denoted with strikethroughs.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A
March 2022
A-2 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
General Timing—Offsite & Onsite Infrastructure
Both on-site (in the Rio Del Oro Specific Plan area) and off-site (outside the physical boundaries of the Specific Plan area) public facilities and infrastructure improvements shall be installed to meet projected development demands in accordance with the City’s and/or other agency infrastructure requirements and policies, unless otherwise modified by the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Linking Requirements to General Plan
Before building permit issuance in the Rio Del Oro Project Area, infrastructure required of a specific project shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City, consistent with General Plan Circulation Element and Infrastructure Services and Finance Policies in effect at the time of small lot tentative map approval, unless otherwise modified by the Tier 2 Entitlements (including, but not limited to, the Tier 2 Development Agreement).
Refinement of Onsite Infrastructure
The Financing Plan shall provide the minimum infrastructure required to meet the development demands of each phase of development. These infrastructure requirements will be refined as part of the review and processing of individual projects prior to the approval of small lot tentative maps or prior to building permits for projects that do not require an associated small lot tentative map.
Tying Offsite Core to Internal Capital Projects
The City of Rancho Cordova Core Backbone Roadway Phasing Plan (attached as Exhibit 8-2), provides minimum Rio Del Oro offsite infrastructure required to meet development standards throughout the City. These offsite infrastructure improvements are required and will be timed with Rio Del Oro onsite capital improvement requirements as provided in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Offsite Core Infrastructure Timing
Offsite infrastructure timing requirements will be identified in the overall project Conditions of Approval and will be incorporated into the Financing Plan that will be prepared and approved by the City prior to the approval of the first Tier 2 Master Large Lot tentative map.
Finance Mechanisms and Funding Availability
Finance mechanisms that ensure the availability of funding for delivery of required onsite and offsite infrastructure will be in place prior to the approval of final maps or prior to the issuance of building permits for projects that do not require an associated final map. The required infrastructure will be consistent with defined roadway improvements in each phase of development and consistent with City Core Backbone Plan requirements.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-3
Forms of Dedication
All dedications shall be in a form approved by the City, including but not limited to grant deeds, easements, irrevocable offers of dedication, or other approved instruments. The type and form of the dedication shall be at the sole discretion of the City, or as otherwise provided for in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Right-of-Way and Easement Dedication
Developers shall be required to dedicate right-of-way, public utility easements, landscape easements and pedestrian easements for arterial roadway, collector and residential roads consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan, with the final map prior to improvement plan approval or the issuance of building permits for individual development proposals.
Park Dedications
All accepted parklands, paseos and other open space shall be dedicated to the City or another appropriate agency, as determined by the City. The timing for the delivery of parks, recreation facilities, paseos and open space within the subject phase shall be determined before the approval of the first small lot tentative subdivision map in the corresponding phase of the Specific Plan, or as set forth in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Major Roadway Timing and Completeness
The City’s goal is to have all infrastructure including onsite and offsite roadway improvements serving a community completed prior to the issuance of building permits in that community.
The Tier 2 Entitlement process will identify the specific timing of the construction of arterial and collector roadway improvements. Clarification of roadway elements that will be subject to this requirement will also be developed and finalized prior to completion of the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Internal Streets Timing and Completeness
The City’s goal is to ensure that the phasing of construction within each tentative subdivision map provides logical and reasonably complete infrastructure for residents who occupy homes within the subdivision prior to completion of the entire mapped subdivision. As such, the developer shall provide a phasing plan addressing sequencing and build-out of all internal streets depicted on the tentative map. A detailed agreement on requirements and timing for the Tentative Map Phasing Plan will be finalized as part of the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Logical Completion of Roadway Segments
All roadways, pedestrian facilities, and bikeways shall be constructed in logical and complete segments, connecting from intersection to intersection, to provide safe and adequate access with each phase of development as conditioned with the ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A
March 2022
A-4 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
approval of each small lot tentative map, or as set forth in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Two Points of Access
Each phase of a project or tentative subdivision map shall include a collector or local street system that provides at least two points of access to arterial roadways, to the satisfaction of the City.
Arterial Roadway Completeness
Wherever collector or local roadways intersect an arterial roadway, that arterial roadway shall be improved, in accordance with the “Logical Completion of Segments” and “Major Roadway Timing and Completeness” items above, from that point to the next completed arterial roadway segment, or as otherwise set forth in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Intersection Completion
When intersections are part of the required roadway improvements, they shall be constructed to their planned ultimate configuration, unless otherwise set forth in the Tier 2 Entitlements. Where an intersection is planned for signalization, the new signal shall be installed during construction of the intersection, unless the Tier 2 Entitlements specify otherwise.
Ultimate Utility Installation
Underground sewer, water and drainage facilities shall be installed to the ultimate planned capacity as part of required road construction, unless otherwise set forth in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Operations and Maintenance Financing
All properties shall be included in one or more financing districts (or will establish an alternative financing mechanism) to provide adequate funding as determined by the City for the annual operation and maintenance costs of streets, street lights, drainage ways, landscaping corridors, open space, parks, and other public facilities prior to the approval of final maps or prior to building permits for projects that do not require an associated final map, or as otherwise set forth in the Tier 2 Entitlements.
Police CFD for Residential Projects
Residential properties will be included in a Community Facilities District that supports police service costs prior to approval of a small lot tentative subdivision map, or for residential properties that do not require subdivision, prior to issuance of building permits.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A
March 2022
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-5
The improvements and requirements described in Appendix B and the cost estimates for these improvements in Appendix D are based on the City standards and policies in effect at the time of the Specific Plan document approval, subject to the terms and conditions of the amended and revised Tier 2 Development Agreement.
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A
March 2022
A-6 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDIX B:
Infrastructure Phasing Plan
Map B-1 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Phasing Plan
Map B-2 Rio Del Oro Phase 1 Infrastructure
Map B-3 Rio Del Oro Phase 2 Infrastructure
Map B-4 Rio Del Oro Phase 3 Infrastructure
Map B-5 Rio Del Oro Phase 4 Infrastructure
Map B-6 Rio Del Oro Phase 5 Infrastructure
Map B-7 Rio Del Oro Phase A Infrastructure
Map B-8 Rio Del Oro Phase B Infrastructure
Map B-9 Rio Del Oro Phase C Infrastructure
Map B-10 Rio Del Oro Phase D Infrastructure
Map B-11 Rio Del Oro Phase E Infrastructure
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-ASF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
63-A
MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B
MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A
MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31 BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
101-A
DP
100-DP
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP 25-D MP 58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A
MP
72-C
MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B
MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B
MP
19-B
HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B MP
5-C
MP
INTERNATIONALDRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D
GREENBELT
1-F
PARK
11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 DSF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A MD
12-A MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B MD
19-A MD
21 P / QP
22BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B CP
63-A MP
65HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A MD
93HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A MD 40 HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33HD 32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
EXTENSION
101-A DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP
25-D MP
58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E DP
4-A
SF
5-AMP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42 ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A MP
72-C MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF 78-E
SF
78-F SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B MP
19-B HD
58-B CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B MD
6-B
SF 6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B MP
5-CMP
INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT
SF
108-B GREENBELT
108-C GREENBELT
108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT
107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D GREENBELT
1-F PARK
11-B MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A GREENBELT
109-B GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-2 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
63-A
MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B
MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A
MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31 BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
101-A
DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP 25-D MP 58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10 MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A
MP
72-C
MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B
MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E
SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B
MP
19-B
HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B
MP
5-C
MP
INTERNATIONAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D
GREENBELT
1-F
PARK
11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-3
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A MD
12-A MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B MD
19-A MD
21 P / QP
22BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B CP
63-A MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58CP
60 HS / MS
74-A MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A MD
93HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A MD 40 HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33HD 32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP 103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
EXTENSION
101-A DP
100 -D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP
25-D MP
58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E DP
4-A
SF
5-AMP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42 ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A MP
72-C MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF 78-E
SF
78-F SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B MP
19-B HD
58-B CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B MD
6-B
SF 6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B MP
5-CMP
INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COL LECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT
SF
108-B GREENBELT
108-C GREENBELT
108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT
107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D GREENBELT
1-F PARK
11-B MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A GREENBELT
109-B GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-4 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
63-A
MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B
MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A
MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31 BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURECENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
101-A
DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP
25-D
MP
58-A
CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10 MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A
MP
72-C
MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B
MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E
SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B
MP
19-B
HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B
MP
5-C
MP
INTERNATIONAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D
GREENBELT
1-F
PARK
11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-5
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
63-A
MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B
MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A
MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
101-A
DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP 25-D MP 58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10 MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A
MP
72-C
MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B
MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E
SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B
MP
19-B
HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-BMP
5-C
MP
INTERNATI ONAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D
GREENBELT
1-F
PARK
11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-6
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
63-A
MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B
MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A
MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
101-A
DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP 25-D MP 58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A
MP
72-C
MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B
MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E
SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B
MP
19-B
HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B
MP
5-C
MP
INTERNATIONAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D
GREENBELT
1-F
PARK
11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-7
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
63-A
MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B
MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A
MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31 BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
101-A
DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP 25-D MP 58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A
MP
72-C
MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B
MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E
SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B
MP
19-B
HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B
MP
5-C
MP
INTERNATIONAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D
GREENBELT
1-F
PARK
11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-8
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A MD
12-A MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B MD
19-A MD
21 P / QP
22BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B CP
63-A MP
65HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A MD
93HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A MD 40 HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33HD 32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP 103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
EXTENSION
101-A DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP
25-D MP
58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E DP
4-A
SF
5-AMP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42 ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A MP
72-C MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF 78-E
SF
78-F SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B MP
19-B HD
58-B CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B MD
6-B
SF 6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B MP
5-CMP
INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT
SF
108-B GREENBELT
108-C GREENBELT
108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT
107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D GREENBELT
1-F PARK
11-B MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A GREENBELT
109-B GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-9 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A MD
12-A MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B MD
19-A MD
21 P / QP
22BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B CP
63-A MP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A MD
93HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A MD 40 HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33HD
32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP 103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
EXTENSION
101-A DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP
25-D MP
58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E DP
4-A
SF
5-AMP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42 ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A MP
72-C MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF 78-E
SF
78-F SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B MP
19-B HD
58-B CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B MD
6-B
SF 6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B MP
5-CMP
INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT
SF
108-B GREENBELT
108-C GREENBELT
108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT
107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D GREENBELT
1-F PARK
11-B MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A GREENBELT
109-B GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-10 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
COLLECTOR C
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A MD
12-A MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B MD
19-A MD
21 P / QP
22BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B CP
63-A MP
65HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP
70 SWD
71 MP
72-B MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 HS / MS
74-A MP
75 MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A MD
93HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A MD 40 HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33HD 32 PARK
31BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP 103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
FUTURE CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
EXTENSION
101-A DP
100-D P
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
98 - DP
25-D MP
58-A CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E DP
4-A
SF
5-AMP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42 ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 ES 16/17 PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C MP
10MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
72-A MP
72-C MP
73-B
BP
73-C
BP
73-D
BP
73-A
BP
74-B MP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF 78-E
SF
78-F SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63-B MP
19-B HD
58-B CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B MP
5-CMP
INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
92-C MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
COL LECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT
SF
108-B GREENBELT
108-C GREENBELT
108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT
107-B GREENBELT
107-C GREENBELT
107-D GREENBELT
1-F PARK
11-B MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A GREENBELT
109-B GREENBELT
77 PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 2
Wetlands
PHASE B
PHASE D
PHASE A
PHASE C
PHASE E
PHASE 5
Map B-11 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDIX C:
EPS Summary of
Infrastructure Costs and Credits
Table C-1 Summary of Estimated Roadway
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-1 Table C-2 Summary of Estimated Drainage
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-2 Table C-3 Summary of Estimated Water
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-3 Table C-4 Summary of Estimated Sewer
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-4 Table C-5 Summary of Estimated Parks
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-5 Table C-6 Summary of Estimated Green Infrastructure
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-6 Table C-7 Summary of Estimated Trails
Costs and Reimbursements................................... C-7 Table C-8 Summary of Estimated Environmental
Mitigation Costs .................................................. C-8 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Roadway Costs and Reimbursements [1] Est. Net after Est. Net after Est. Net after Est. Net after Est. Net after Est. Net after CIP ID Segment Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb.
Offsite Backbone Roadways
195-200 White Rock Road Phase 1 City $2,706,500 $0 $2,706,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $225,000 $2,931,500 $0 $2,931,500 Onsite Backbone Roadway
111-114 International Drive Phase 5 Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,493,460 $6,668,680 $3,824,780 $10,493,460 $6,668,680 $3,824,780 129-132 Rancho Cordova Parkway Elliott $3,148,640 $1,216,520 $1,932,120 $8,448,340 $5,878,520 $2,569,820 $0 $0 $0 $17,216,180 $4,962,240 $12,253,940 $5,756,020 $2,454,460 $3,301,560 $34,569,180 $14,511,740 $20,057,440 1-4 Rio del Oro Parkway Elliott $0 $0 $0 $8,330,040 $3,945,340 $4,384,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,330,040 $3,945,340 $4,384,700
24.1-24.4 Centennial Drive Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 27-30 Americanos Boulevard Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 8-11 Villagio Drive Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,927,700 $620,000 $3,307,700 $5,861,000 $1,360,900 $4,500,100 $0 $0 $0 $9,788,700 $1,980,900 $7,807,800 56-58 Douglas Road Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,082,400 0 $1,082,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,082,400 $0 $1,082,400 180 Sunrise Boulevard Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,700 0 $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,700 $0 $375,700 Subtotal Onsite Backbone Roadways $3,148,640 $1,216,520 $1,932,120 $16,778,380 $9,823,860 $6,954,520 $5,385,800 $620,000 $4,765,800 $23,077,180 $6,323,140 $16,754,040 $16,249,480 $9,123,140 $7,126,340 $64,639,480 $27,106,660 $37,532,820 Collector Roadways $0 $0 $0
Collector A White Rock Road to International Drive Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,837,890 $0 $1,837,890 $1,837,890 $0 $1,837,890 Collector B [2] Rio del Oro Parkway to Centennial Drive Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Collector C International Drive to Rancho Cordova Parkway Elliott $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,768,340 $0 $2,768,340 $2,768,340 $0 $2,768,340 Subtotal Collector Roadways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,606,230 $0 $4,606,230 $4,606,230 $0 $4,606,230 Total Roadways $5,855,140 $1,216,520 $4,638,620 $16,778,380 $9,823,860 $6,954,520 $5,385,800 $620,000 $4,765,800 $23,077,180 $6,323,140 $16,754,040 $21,080,710 $9,123,140 $11,957,570 $72,177,210 $27,106,660 $45,070,550 roadsum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. [1] Estimated reimbursements may take the form of fee credits, cash reimbursements, or combination of the two from the City's Transportation Development Impact Fee program depending on the fee program and agency policies. [2] Collector B is not within Elliot Homes' Phase 1-5.
Constructing
Entity
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Total
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
C-1 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Drainage Costs and Reimbursements [1] Phase
Constructing
Entity Costs Est. Reimb.
Est. Net After
Reimb.
Phase 1 Elliott $5,117,357 $5,933,072 ($815,715)
Phase 2 Elliott $14,500,354 $7,669,570 $6,830,784
Phase 3 Elliott $4,597,148 $3,621,974 $975,174
Phase 4 Elliott $5,601,079 $4,254,282 $1,346,797
Phase 5 Elliott $2,062,949 $1,617,075 $445,873
Subtotal $31,878,887 $23,095,973 $8,782,914
drainsum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided January 2022. [1] Estimated reimbursements may take the form of fee credits, cash reimbursements or combination of the two from the City's Storm Drainage Impact Fee program depending on the fee program and agency policies.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
C-2 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-3
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Water Costs and Reimbursements [1] Phase
Constructing
Entity Costs Est. Reimb.
Net After
Reimb.
Phase 1 Elliott $488,568 $488,568 $0
Phase 2 Elliott $6,619,532 $6,619,532 $0
Phase 3 Elliott $338,846 $338,846 $0
Phase 4 Elliott $3,194,817 $3,194,817 $0
Phase 5 Elliott $1,212,362 $1,212,362 $0
Subtotal $11,854,125 $11,854,125 $0
watersum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided January 2022. [1] Estimated reimbursements may take the form of fee credits, cash reimbursements or combination of the two from the Sacramento County Water Agency's Zone 40 Water Development Fee
program depending on the fee program and agency policies.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
C-3 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan ImplementationSummary of Estimated Sewer Costs and Reimbursements [1] Est. Net after Est. Net after Est. Net after
Phase Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb. Costs Reimb. Reimb.Phase 1 Elliott $0 $0 $0 $1,361,100 $1,361,100 $0 $1,361,100 $1,361,100 $0Phase 2 Elliott $4,333,500 $4,333,500 $0 $8,506,700 $8,506,700 $0 $12,840,200 $12,840,200 $0Phase 3 Elliott $640,184 $640,184 $0 $964,184 $964,184 $0 $1,604,367 $1,604,367 $0Phase 4 Elliott $0 $0 $0 $2,000,465 $2,000,465 $0 $2,000,465 $2,000,465 $0Phase 5 Elliott $0 $0 $0 $8,025,774 $8,025,774 $0 $8,025,774 $8,025,774 $0Subtotal $4,973,684 $4,973,684 $0 $20,858,222 $20,858,222 $0 $25,831,906 $25,831,906 $0 sewersum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided January 2022.
Interim Facilities Permanent Facilities
Constructing Entity
Total Costs
[1] Estimated reimbursements may take the form of fee credits, cash reimbursements or combination of the two from the Sacramento Area Sewer District's Sewer Impact Fee program depending on the fee program and agency policies.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
C-4
Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-5
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Parks Costs and Reimbursements [1] Phase
Constructing
Entity Costs Est. Reimb.
Net After
Reimb.
Phase 1 Elliott $1,178,100 $0 $1,178,100
Phase 2 Elliott $1,247,400 $0 $1,247,400
Phase 3 Elliott $0 $0 $0
Phase 4 Elliott $1,155,000 $0 $1,155,000
Phase 5 Elliott $14,853,300 $0 $14,853,300
Subtotal $18,433,800 $0 $18,433,800
parks sum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. [1] Estimated reimbursements may take the form of fee credits, cash reimbursements or combination of the two from the Cordova Recreation and Park Districts Park Fee program depending on the fee program and agency policies.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 C-5 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-6
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Green Infrastructure Costs and Reimbursements Phase
Constructing
Entity Costs Est. Reimb. [1] Net After Reimb.
Phase 1 Elliott $3,864,000 $0 $3,864,000
Phase 2 Elliott $1,835,998 $0 $1,835,998
Phase 3 Elliott $5,637,599 $0 $5,637,599
Phase 4 Elliott $6,528,297 $0 $6,528,297
Phase 5 Elliott $1,958,450 $0 $1,958,450
Subtotal $19,824,344 $0 $19,824,344
green infra
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. [1] All green infrastructure will be developer-constructed, and green infrastructure costs are not eligible for fee credits or reimbursements.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 C-6 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-7
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Trails Costs and Reimbursements
Phase
Constructing
Entity Costs Est. Reimb. [1]
Net After
Reimb.
Phase 1 Elliott $566,797 $0 $566,797
Phase 2 Elliott $300,300 $0 $300,300
Phase 3 Elliott $617,386 $0 $617,386
Phase 4 Elliott $730,191 $0 $730,191
Phase 5 Elliott $920,766 $0 $920,766
Subtotal $3,135,440 $0 $3,135,440
trails sum
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. [1] All trails will be developer-constructed, and trail costs are not eligible for fee credits or reimbursements.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 C-7 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table C-8
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Financing Plan Implementation Summary of Estimated Environmental Mitigation Costs
Phase
Constructing
Entity [1] Costs Est. Reimb. [1]
Net After
Reimb.
Phase 1 TBD 6,618,378.00 $ $0 $6,618,378
Phase 2 TBD 375,000.00 $ $0 $375,000
Phase 3 TBD 2,932,040.00 $ $0 $2,932,040
Phase 4 TBD 151,750.00 $ $0 $151,750
Phase 5 TBD 151,750.00 $ $0 $151,750
Subtotal $10,228,918 $0 $10,228,918
env. mitigation
Source: Wood Rodgers Cost Estimates provided February 2022. [1] The ultimate sharing of costs for environmental mitigation has yet to be determined.
Prepared by EPS 3/1/2022
C-8 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\202000\202007 Rio Del Oro Infrastructure Finance Implementation Plan\Model\202007 m2 02-23-22 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDIX D:
Detailed Infrastructure Costs and Credits
Table D.1-1 Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway
Costs by Road Segment and Phase (3 pages) ......... D-1 Table D.1-2 Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway
Credits/Reimbursements by Road
Segment and Phase (3 pages).............................. D-4 Map D.1-1 Onsite Roadway Improvements ............................ D-7 Map D.1-2 Offsite Roadway Improvements............................ D-8 Exhibit D.1-1 Funding of Typical Roadway Sections .................... D-9 Map D.1-3 Master Road Sections Exhibit .............................. D-10 Exhibit D.1-2 Roadway Sections A–C ....................................... D-11 Exhibit D.1-3 Roadway Sections D–D2..................................... D-12 Exhibit D.1-4 Roadway Section E–F2....................................... D-13 Exhibit D.1-5 Roadway Sections F-3–H .................................... D-14 Exhibit D.1-6 Roadway Sections I–L ........................................ D-15 Exhibit D.1-7 Roadway Sections M–O ...................................... D-16 Exhibit D.1-8 Typical 4-Lane Construction Phasing Options......... D-17 Exhibit D.1-9 Typical 6-Lane Construction Phasing Options......... D-18 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.2-1 Rio del Oro Drainage System Costs................................................ D-19 Table D.2-2 Drainage System Credits/Reimbursement (2 pages)......................... D-20 Map D.2-1 Preliminary Onsite Drainage System .............................................. D-22 Table D.3-1 Rio del Oro Water System Costs .................................................... D-23 Table D.3-2 Water System Credits/Reimbursement........................................... D-24 Map D.3-1 Water Service Boundaries ............................................................ D-25 Map D.3-2 Proposed Water Transmission Layout ............................................. D-26 Map D.3-3 Off-Site Water Improvements ....................................................... D-27 Table D.4-1 Rio del Oro Sewer System Cost (2 pages)....................................... D-28 Table D.4-2 Sewer System Credits/Reimbursements (3 pages) ........................... D-30 Map D.4-1 Onsite Sewer Improvements......................................................... D-33 Map D.4-2 Offsite Sewer Improvements......................................................... D-34 Table D.5-1 Rio Del Oro Open Space and Trails Total Cost Estimate..................... D-35 Table D.5-2 Rio Del Oro Open Space and Trails Summary .................................. D-36 Table D.5-3 Rio Del Oro Green Infrastructure Unit Cost...................................... D-37 Table D.5-4 Rio Del Oro Parks Unit Cost .......................................................... D-38 Table D.5-5 Rio Del Oro Trails Unit Cost .......................................................... D-39 Map D.5-1 Conceptual Park and Open Space Master Plan ................................. D-40 Map D.5-2 Trails and Open Spaces Plan ......................................................... D-41 Map D.5-3 Bikeways and Trails Plan .............................................................. D-42 Table D.6-1 Rio Del Oro Environmental Mitigation Cost ...................................... D-43 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.1-1Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway Costs by Road Segment and Phase Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Off-site Roadway
White Rock Road (CIP ID 195-200); White Rock Road is a CITY CIP Project to be constructed by the City. Elliott will reimburse the City for the Developer Frontage Portion of White Rock Road. 1 Developer Frontage Impr.
WRR Estimate/LuyungRCP w/Frontage $450 2700 $1,215,000 $0 $0 $0 500 $225,000 3200 $1,440,000 1B LLTM Parcels 65/66 Developer Frontage Impr.
WRR Estimate/LuyungRCP w/Frontage $450 1950 $877,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 1950 $877,500 1A Intersection (Right-in-Right-out) Unit 1A 6 x 2 Int (WRR/Unit 1A) $614,000 1 $614,000 1 $614,000 Subtotal White Rock Road $2,706,500 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $2,931,500 On-site Backbone Roadway
International Drive (CIP ID 111-114)
1 Rio del Oro Boundary to Rancho Cordova Parkway 98' ROW $1,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 3256 $5,730,560 3256 $5,730,560 1A Signalized Intersection at Collector Road C Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 $0 $0 1 $375,700 1 $375,700 2 Signalized Intersection at Rancho Cordova Parkway 6 x 6 Intersection $2,680,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $2,680,000 1 $2,680,0003 Rancho Cordova Parkway to Collector A 98' ROW $1,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 970 $1,707,200 970 $1,707,2004 Signalized Intersection at Centennial Drive 6 x 4 Intersection $2,131,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $05 Signalized Intersection at Americanos Boulevard 6 x 4 Intersection $2,131,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $06 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road 6 x 6 Intersection $2,680,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal International Drive $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,493,460 $10,493,460 Rancho Cordova Parkway (CIP ID 129-132)
1A Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road South Leg 98' ROW $1,760 400 $704,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 400 $704,0001B Sigalized Intersection RCP/Unit 3A 6x2 Intersection (RCP/Ui $614,000 2 White Rock Road to Phase 1 Boundary 98' ROW $1,760 1389 $2,444,640 $0 $0 $0 $0 1389 $2,444,6403 Phase 1 Boundary to Collector C 98' ROW $1,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 3057 $5,380,320 3057 $5,380,3204 Signalized Intersection at Collector Road C 6 x 2 $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $375,700 1 $375,7005 Collector C to Rio del Oro Parkway 98' ROW $1,760 $0 3064 $5,392,640 $0 $0 $0 3064 $5,392,6406 Signalized Intersection at High School / Middle SchooTraffic Signal $375,700 $0 1 $375,700 $0 $0 $0 1 $375,700 7 Signalized Intersection at Rio Del Oro Parkway 6 x 6 $2,680,000 $0 1 $2,680,000 $0 $0 $0 1 $2,680,000 8 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 98' ROW $1,760 $0 $0 $0 3418 $6,015,680 $0 3418 $6,015,680 8A 2-12x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $289,000 $0 $0 $0 1 $289,000 $0 1 $289,000 9 Signalized Intersection at Villagio Drive 6 x 2 Intersection $2,123,000 $0 $0 $0 1 $2,123,000 $0 1 $2,123,000 10 Villagio Drive to Preserve Boundary 98' ROW $1,760 $0 $0 $0 1800 $3,168,000 $0 1800 $3,168,000 10A Preserve Boundary to Douglas Road 76' ROW/108 SS $1,490 $0 $0 $0 3120 $4,648,800 $0 3120 $4,648,80010B 2-8x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $219,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 11 Signalized Intersection at Douglas Road-North Leg 76'ROW/108SS+Traffic S $971,700 $0 $0 $0 1 $971,700 $0 1 $971,700 Subtotal Rancho Cordova Parkway $3,148,640 $8,448,340 $0 $17,216,180 $5,756,020 $34,569,180 Rio del Oro Parkway (CIP ID 1-4)
1 Signalized Intersection at Sunrise Boulevard
East Leg; 98' ROW+ Traffic Signal $1,760 400 $1,079,700 $0 $0 $0 400 $1,079,700 2 Sunrise Boulevard to Rancho Cordova Parkway 98' ROW $1,760 $0 3782 4,084,600 $ $0 $0 $0 3782 $4,084,600 3 Signalized Intersection at High Density Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 1 $375,700 $0 $0 $0 1 $375,700 4 Signalized Intersection at Medium Density Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 1 $375,700 $0 $0 $0 1 $375,700 5 Rancho Cordova Parkway to Phase 2 Boundary 76' ROW $1,530 $0 1578 $2,414,340 $0 $0 $0 1578 $2,414,340 5A 2-8x6 Box Culverts $184,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0
6 Signalized Intersection at Centennial Drive 4 x 4 Intersection $2,456,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 7 Centennial Drive to Americanos Boulevard
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 8 Signalized Intersection at Americanos Boulevard 4 x 4 Intersection $2,456,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 9 Drainage Parkway to White Rock Road
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 10 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road 6 x 4 Intersection $2,433,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Rio del Oro Parkway $0 $8,330,040 $0 $0 $0 $8,330,040 Phase 5 Total
Roadway Costs
Phases 1-5
Description Unit Cost
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 Road Costs
D-1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.1-1Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway Costs by Road Segment and Phase Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Phase 5 Total
Roadway Costs
Phases 1-5
Description Unit Cost
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
Centennial Drive (CIP ID 24.1-24.4)
1 International Drive to Rio Del Oro Parkway
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio/PH-A Boundary
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2A 2-12x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $289,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 3 Roundabout at Villagio Drive Roundabout-Prices $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 4 Villagio/PH-C to Americanos Boulevard
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 4A 2-10x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts Prices $265,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 5 Signalized Intersection at Americanos Boulevard 4 x 4 Intersection $2,456,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 6 Americanos Boulevard to Collector B
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Centennial Drive $0 $0
Americanos Boulevard (CIP ID 27-30)
1 International Drive to Rio Del Oro Parkway 76' ROW $1,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 76' ROW $1,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2A 2-10x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $265,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 3 Signalized Intersection at Villagio Drive Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 4 Villagio Drive to Centennial Drive 76' ROW $1,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 4A 2-10x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $265,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 5 Centennial Drive to Douglas Road 76' ROW $1,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 5A 2-8x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $219,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 6 Signalized Intersection at Douglas Road 4 x 2 Intersection $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Americanos Boulevard $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Villagio Drive (CIP ID 8-11)
1 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road 6 x 2 Intersection $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $02 White Rock Road to Collector B 76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 3 Roundabout at Collector B Roundabout-Prices $231,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $04 Collector B to Americanos Boulevard 57' ROW $1,260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $05 Americanos Blvd to Drainage Parkway/Ph-5 Bdry 57' ROW $1,260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $06 Ph-4 Boundary to Morrison Creek Bridge 57' ROW $1,260 $0 $0 $0 3890 $4,901,400 $0 3890 $4,901,400 6A 2-8x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $219,600 $0 $0 $0 1 $219,600 $0 1 $219,600 7 Morrison Creek Bridge to Douglas Road
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) $1,480 $0 $0 2000 $2,960,000 500 $740,000 $0 2500 $3,700,000 8 Signalized Intersection at Medium / High Density Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 9 Signalized Intersection at Douglas Road
North Leg 76' ROW, 2 Lanes Res ROW 4 Lanes +Traffic Signal $1,480 $0 $0 400 $967,700 $0 $0 400 $967,700 Subtotal Villagio Drive $0 $0 $3,927,700 $5,861,000 $0 $9,788,700 Douglas Road (CIP ID 56-58)
1 Sunrise Boulevard to Villagio Drive Developer Frontage $440 $0 $0 2000 $880,000 $0 $0 2000 $880,0002 Rio Del Oro Boundary Douglas Frontage Douglas Frontage $440 $0 $0 460 $202,400 $0 $0 460 $202,400 Subtotal Douglas Road $0 $0 $1,082,400 $0 $0 $1,082,400 Sunrise Boulevard (CIP ID 180)
1 Signalized Intersection at RTC Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 $0 1 $375,700 $0 $0 1 $375,700 Subtotal Sunrise Boulevard $0 $0 $375,700 $0 $0 $375,700 202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 Road Costs
D-2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.1-1Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway Costs by Road Segment and Phase Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Phase 5 Total
Roadway Costs
Phases 1-5
Description Unit Cost
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
Collector A
1 White Rock Road to International Drive 65' ROW $810 $0 $0 $0 $0 2269 $1,837,890 2269 $1,837,8902 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road South Leg 65' ROW + Traffic Signal $375,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $375,700 1 $375,700 Subtotal Collector A $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,837,890 $1,837,890
Collector C
1 International Drive to Rancho Cordova Parkway 47' ROW $870 $0 $0 $0 $0 3182 $2,768,340 3182 $2,768,340 Subtotal Collector C $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,768,340 $2,768,340
Collector B
1 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 57' ROW $1,260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2 Villagio Drive to Centennial Drive 57' ROW $1,260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2A 2- 8 x 6 Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $184,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Collector B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Estimated On-Site Backbone Roadway Cost $5,855,140 $16,778,380 $5,385,800 $23,077,180 $21,080,710 $72,177,210 Per Rio Del Oro Large Lot Tentative Map Road Costs are based on Wood Rodgers' estimates and consistent with the current City-approved TDIF estimates 2015. The City is updating the TDIF/CIP, which is in draft form and was not used for this update. 202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 Road Costs
D-3
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.1-2Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway Credits/ Reimbursements by Road Segment and Phase Fee
Program
Line Item Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Off-site Roadway
White Rock Road (CIP ID 195-200)
1 CIP Portion
WRR to be constructed as a City CIP Project . $0.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1A Intersection (Right-in-Right-out) Village 2 6 x 2 Int (WRR/Village2) $0 1 $0 0 0 0 0 1 $0 Subtotal International Drive $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
On-site Backbone Roadway CIP Reimbursements
International Drive (CIP ID 111-114)
1 Rio del Oro Boundary to Rancho Cordova Parkwa98' Road Reimbursement $680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3256 $2,214,080 3256 $2,214,080 1A Signalized Intersection at Collector Road C 6 x 2 Int Reimburse $1,414,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $1,414,000 1 $1,414,000 2 Signalized Intersection at Rancho Cordova Parkw6 x 6 Int Reimburse $2,381,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $2,381,000 1 $2,381,000 3 Rancho Cordova Parkway to Collector A 98' Road Reimbursement $680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 970 $659,600 970 $659,6004 Signalized Intersection at Centennial Drive 6 x 4 Int Reimburse $2,131,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 Signalized Intersection at Americanos Boulevard 6 x 4 Int Reimburse $2,131,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $06 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road 6 x 6 Int Reimburse-North Leg $272,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal International Drive $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,668,680 $6,668,680 Rancho Cordova Parkway (CIP ID 129-132)
1 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road South Leg 98' Road Reimb $680 400 $272,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 400 $272,0002 White Rock Road to Phase 1 Boundary 98' Road Reimburse $680 1389 $944,520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1389 $944,5203 Phase 1 Boundary to Collector C 98' Road Reimburse $680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3057 $2,078,760 3057 $2,078,760 4 Signalized Intersection at Collector Road C 6 x 2 Int Reimburse $375,700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $375,700 1 $375,7005 Collector Road C to Rio del Oro Parkway 98' Road Reimburse $680 0 $0 3064 $2,083,520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3064 $2,083,520 6 Signalized Intersection at High School / Middle Sc6 x 2 Int. Reimburse $1,414,000 0 $0 1 $1,414,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $1,414,000 7 Signalized Intersection at Rio Del Oro Parkway 6 x 6 Int Reimburse $2,381,000 0 $0 1 $2,381,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $2,381,0008 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 98' Road Reimburse $680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3418 $2,324,240 0 $0 3418 $2,324,240 8A Box Culverts 2-12x8 Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 0 $0 1 $0 9 Signalized Intersection at Villagio Drive 6 x 2 Int Reimburse $1,414,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $1,414,000 0 $0 1 $1,414,000 10 Villagio Drive to Preserve Boundary 98' Road Reimburse $680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1800 $1,224,000 0 $0 1800 $1,224,000 10A Preserve Boundary to Douglas Road 76' ROW/108' SS RCP w/in P $1,490 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3120 $4,648,800 0 $0 3120 $4,648,800 10B 2-8x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 11 Signalized Intersection at Douglas Road 76'ROW/108SS+Traffic Signa $971,700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $971,700 0 $0 1 $971,700 Subtotal Rancho Cordova Parkway $1,216,520 $5,878,520 $0 $4,962,240 $2,454,460 $14,511,740 Rio del Oro Parkway (CIP ID 1-4)
1 Signalized Intersection at Sunrise Boulevard East Leg; 98' ROW + Traffic S $647,700 0 $0 1 $647,700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $647,700 2 Sunrise Boulevard to Rancho Cordova Parkway 98' Road Reimburse $680 0 $0 3782 $2,571,760 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3782 $2,571,760 3 Signalized Intersection at High Density Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 1 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 4 Signalized Intersection at Medium Density Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 1 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 5 Rancho Cordova Parkway to Phase 2 Boundary 76' Road Reimburse $460 0 $0 1578 $725,880 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1578 $725,880 5A 2-8x6 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 Signalized Intersection at Centennial Drive 4 x 4 Int Reimburse $2,076,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Phase 5 Total
Roadway Credits/
Reimbursments
Phases 1-5
Phase 4
Description Unit Reimbursement
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 Road Fee Reimburse
D-4
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.1-2Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway Credits/ Reimbursements by Road Segment and Phase Fee
Program
Line Item Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Phase 5 Total
Roadway Credits/
Reimbursments
Phases 1-5
Phase 4
Description Unit Reimbursement
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
7 Centennial Drive to Americanos Boulevard
76' ROW (2 Lanes, Reserv ROW 4 Lanes) $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 Signalized Intersection at Americanos Boulevard 4 x 4 Int Reimburse $2,076,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $09 Americanos Boulevard to White Rock Road 76' ROW (2 lanes, Reserv RO $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 10 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road 6 x 4 Int Reimburse $2,131,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Rio del Oro Parkway $0 $3,945,340 $0 $0 $0 $3,945,340 Centennial Drive (CIP ID 24.1-24.4)
1 International Drive to Rio Del Oro Parkway 76' ROW (2 Lanes Reserv RO $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 76' ROW (2 Lanes Reserv RO $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2A 2-12x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3 Roundabout at Villagio Drive Roundabout-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 Villagio Drive to Americanos Boulevard 76' ROW (2 Lanes Reserv RO $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4A 2-10x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 Signalized Intersection at Americanos Boulevard 4 x 4 Int Reimburse $2,076,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $06 Americanos Boulevard to Collector B 76' ROW (2 Lanes Reserv RO $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Rio del Oro Parkway $0 $0
Americanos Boulevard (CIP ID 27-30)
1 International Drive to Rio Del oro Parkway 76' Road Reimburse $460 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 Rio Del oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 76' Road Reimburse $460 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2A 2-10x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3 Signalized Intersection at Villagio Drive
2 Legs 76' ROW Road Reimb+Traffic Signal $743,700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 Villagio Drive to Centennial Drive 76' Road Reimburse $460 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4A 2-10x8 Box Culverts Box Culvert Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 Centennial Drive to Douglas Road 76' Road Reimburse $460 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5A 2-8x8 Box Culverts Box Culverts-Prices $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 Signalized Intersection at Douglas Road Traffic Signal $375,700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Americanos Boulevard $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Villagio Drive (CIP ID 8-11)
1 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 White Rock Road to Collector B
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) Reimb. $310 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Roundabout at Collector B $0 00 000 04 Collector B to Americanos Boulevard 76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) Reimb. $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 Americanos Boulevard to Drainage Pkwy/Ph-5 B
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) Reimb. $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 Road Fee Reimburse
D-5
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.1-2Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Rio del Oro On-Site Backbone Roadway Credits/ Reimbursements by Road Segment and Phase Fee
Program
Line Item Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Quantity Total Phase 5 Total
Roadway Credits/
Reimbursments
Phases 1-5
Phase 4
Description Unit Reimbursement
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
6 Ph-5 Boundary to Morrison Creek Bridge
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) Reimb. $310 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3890 $1,205,900 0 $0 3890 $1,205,900 6A 2-8x8 Box Culverts $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 0 $0 1 $0
7 Morrison Creek Bridget to Douglas Road
76' ROW(2 lanes, Rsv ROW 4 lanes) Reimb. $310 0 $0 0 $0 2000 $620,000 500 $155,000 0 $0 2500 $775,000 8 Signalized Intersection at Medium / High Density Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 9 Signalized Intersection at Douglas Road Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 0 $0 400 $0 0 $0 0 $0 400 $0 Subtotal Villagio Drive $0 $0 $620,000 $1,360,900 $0 $1,980,900 Douglas Road (CIP ID 56-58)
1 Sunrise Boulevard to Villagio Drive Developer Frontage $0.00 0 $0 0 $0 2000 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2000 $ - 2 Rio Del Oro Boundary Douglas Frontage Douglas Frontage $0.00 0 $0 0 $0 460 Subtotal Douglas Road $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ -
Sunrise Boulevard (CIP ID 180)
1 Signalized Intersection at RTC Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 Subtotal Sunrise Boulevard $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Collector A
1 White Rock Road to International Drive 65' ROW $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 1 $0 2 Signalized Intersection at White Rock Road Traffic Signal $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Local Road A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Collector C
1 International Drive to Rancho Cordova Parkway 47' ROW $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Subtotal Local Road C $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Collector B
1 Rio Del Oro Parkway to Villagio Drive 57' ROW $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 Villagio Drive to Centennial Drive 57' ROW $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2A 2- 8 x 6 Culverts $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Subtotal Unnamed Street B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Estimated On-Site Backbone Roadway Credit/Reimbursment $1,216,520 $9,823,860 $620,000 $6,323,140 $9,123,140 $27,106,660 Per Rio Del Oro Large Lot Tentative MapReimbursements per Update to the 2035 Transportation CIP and the Nexus Study for the Development Impact Fee Program, dated December 2013 202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 Road Fee Reimburse
D-6
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.1-1
D-7
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.1-2 D-8 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-1 D-9
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.1-3
D-10
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-2 D-11 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-3 D-12 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-4 D-13 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-5 D-14 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-6 D-15 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Exhibit D.1-7 D-16 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
38'
23'
R/W
LANDSCAPE
12'
TRAVEL LANES
8'
38'
23'
BIKE
LANE
R/W
3' 4'
12'
B
76' STREET SECTION
4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
76'
4' 5'
4'BIKE LANE 5'AC SIDEWALK
4'BIKE LANE
5' 2' 4' 2'
CLASS 1 TRAIL
14'
2' 12' 2'
5'11" 21'
LANDSCAPE
CORRIDOR /
P.U.E
EXISTING
NATURAL
LANDSCAPE
SHOULDER
SHOULDER
102'-108'
BIKE LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ LANE
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
(TYP.)
8'
31'-39'P.U.E.
5'AC SIDEWALK
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
DITCH AC DIKE W/
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
38'
23'
BIKE LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/
LANE
R/W
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.)
11'
TRAVEL LANES
8'
38'
23'
BIKE
LANE
R/W
3' 4'
CLASS 1 TRAIL
11' 12'
C
76' STREET SECTION
AMERICANOS BOULEVARD - SPECIAL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
8'
31'-39'
102'-108'
P.U.E.
12'
76'
14'
2' 12' 2'
7'
5'11" 21'
LANDSCAPE
CORRIDOR /
P.U.E
EXISTING
NATURAL
LANDSCAPE
SHOULDER
SHOULDER
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
38'
23'
BIKE LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ LANE
R/W
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.)
11'
TRAVEL LANES
5'
38'
23'
BIKE LANE
R/W
3' 4'
CLASS 1 TRAIL
11.5' 11.5'
A
76' STREET SECTION
4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
8'
31'-39'
102'-108'
P.U.E.
12'
76'
14'
2' 12' 2'
7'
5'11" 21'
LANDSCAPE
CORRIDOR /
P.U.E EXISTING NATURAL
LANDSCAPE
SHOULDER
SHOULDER
BIKE
LANE
3'
CL
R/W
12'
D
76' STREET SECTION
4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
76'
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
38'
23'
R/W
LANDSCAPE
12' 4' 5'
4'BIKE LANE
2'
102'-108'
BIKE LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ LANE
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
(TYP.)
8'
31'-39'P.U.E.
5'AC SIDEWALK
8'
TRAVEL LANES
38'
23'
BIKE
LANE
3' 4'
11'
CLASS 1 TRAIL
14'
2' 12' 2'
5'11" 21'
LANDSCAPE
CORRIDOR /
P.U.E
EXISTING
NATURAL
LANDSCAPE
SHOULDER
SHOULDER
DITCH AC DIKE W/
Exhibit D.1-8
D-17
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ BIKE LANE
R/W
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.)
12' 11'
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR BIKE
LANE
R/W
3' 4'
SIDEWALK 11' 12'
B
98' STREET SECTION
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)STREET TREES
8' 8'
VARIES VARIES
98'
P.U.E.
5'AC SIDEWALK
4' 5'
4'BIKE LANE
5'AC SIDEWALK
4'BIKE LANE
5' 2' 4' 2'
AC DIKE W/ DITCH
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ BIKE LANE
R/W
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.)
12' 11' 11'
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR BIKE
LANE
R/W
3' 4'
SIDEWALK 11' 11' 12'
C
98' STREET SECTION
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
8' 8'
VARIES VARIES
98'
P.U.E.
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ BIKE
LANE
R/W
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.)
12' 11' 11'
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
28'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR BIKE
LANE
R/W
3' 5'
SIDEWALK 14' 14'
5'
A
98' STREET SECTION
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
8' 8'
VARIES VARIES
98'
P.U.E. BIKE LANE
CL
MEDIAN
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/ BIKE
LANE
R/W
4' 3'
SIDEWALK
STREET TREES
LANDSCAPE
(TYP.)
12' 11'
TRAVEL LANES
8'
49'
34'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR BIKE
LANE
R/W
3' 4'
SIDEWALK 11' 11' 12'
D
98' STREET SECTION
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
NOT TO SCALE
(TYP.)
STREET TREES
8' 8'
VARIES VARIES
98'
P.U.E.
4'
BIKE LANE
5'
5' SIDEWALK
4' BIKE
LANE
AC DIKE W/ DITCH
Exhibit D.1-9
D-18
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.2-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio del Oro Drainage System Costs
DRAIN COST BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST Phase 1
12" Storm Drain 83 LF $ 77.00 $6,391
36" Storm Drain 1,010 LF $ 135.00 $136,350
42" Storm Drain 691 LF $ 205.00 $141,655
72" Storm Drain 429 LF $ 455.00 $195,195
Manhole 4 EA 15,700.00 $ $62,800
36" Culvert Headwall/Endwa 6 EA 22,150.00 $ $132,900
42" Culvert Headwall/Endwa 3 EA 25,500.00 $ $76,500
72" Culvert Headwall/Endwa 4 EA 44,800.00 $ $179,200
Caltrans Class III Rip Rap 9,600 Ton $ 64.00 $614,400
West Channel Excavation 28,000 CY $ 3.15 $88,200
South Channel Excavation 164,500 CY $ 3.15 $518,175
Detention Basin Excavation 394,600 CY $ 3.15 $1,242,990 Access Road 3"AC/6"AB 31,102 SF $ 3.25 $101,082
Access Ramp 6"PCC/4"AB 9,731 SF $ 20.75 $201,918
Post & Cable Fence 3' 2,099 LF $ 21.00 $44,079
Erosion Control/Hydroseed
Channels/Basin 12.2 AC 4,000.00 $ $48,800
S/T $3,790,635
Contingency (15%) $568,595
Engineering (20%) $758,127
Phase 1 Total $5,117,357
Phase 2
42" Storm Drain 2,830 LF $ 175.00 $495,250
48" Storm Drain 1,625 LF $193 $313,625
60" Storm Drain 1,990 LF $260 $517,400
Manhole 17 EA $12,000 $204,000
Channel Improvements 3,510 LF $250 $877,500
Detention Basin 25 AC $150,235 $3,755,864
Pump Station 33 CFS $138,708 $4,577,364
S/T $10,741,003
Contingency (15%) $1,611,150
Engineering (20%) $2,148,201
Phase 2 Total $14,500,354
Phase 3
30" Storm Drain 1,835 LF $102 $187,170
36" Storm Drain 930 LF $135 $125,550
54" Storm Drain 2,430 LF $235 $571,050
60" Storm Drain 2,610 LF $260 $678,600
72" Storm Drain 1,265 LF $ 345.00 $436,425
Manhole 17 LF $12,000 $204,000
Channel Improvements 4,810 LF $250 $1,202,500
S/T $3,405,295
Contingency (15%) $510,794
Engineering (20%) $681,059
Phase 3 Total $4,597,148
Phase 4
36" Storm Drain 1,065 LF $ 125.00 $133,125
42" Storm Drain 1,810 LF $ 175.00 $316,750
54" Storm Drain 1,375 LF $235 $323,125
Manhole 13 EA $12,000 $156,000
Detention Basin 6 AC $150,235 $901,407
Pump Station 5 CFS $138,708 $693,540
Channel Improvements 6,500 LF $250 $1,625,000
S/T $4,148,947
Contingency (15%) $622,342
Engineering (20%) $829,789
Phase 4 Total $5,601,079
Phase 5
42" Storm Drain 4,010 LF $ 175.00 $701,750
48" Storm Drain 1,020 LF $193 $196,860
Manhole 16 EA $12,000 $192,000
Channel Improvements 1,750 LF $250 $437,500
S/T $1,528,110
Contingency (15%) $229,217
Engineering (20%) $305,622
Phase 5 Total $2,062,949
TOTAL PHASES 1-5 $31,878,887
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-19 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.2-2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Drainage System Credits/Reimbursment
DRAIN CR/RE BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL CR/RE Phase 1
12" Storm Drain 83 LF $ 55.82 $4,633
36" Storm Drain LF 1,010 $ 127.92 $129,199
42" Storm Drain LF 691 $ 162.81 $112,502
72" Storm Drain LF 429 $ 285.00 $122,265
Manhole 4 EA 9,245.00 $ $36,980
36" Culvert Headwall/Endwal 6 EA 12,264.00 $ $73,584
42" Culvert Headwall/Endwal 3 EA 18,834.00 $ $56,502
72" Culvert Headwall/Endwal 4 EA 32,850.00 $ $131,400
Caltrans Class III Rip Rap 9,600 Ton $66.29 $636,384
West Channel Excavation 28,000 CY $ 4.54 $127,120
South Channel Excavation 164,500 CY $ 4.54 $746,830
Detention Basin 394,600 CY $ $1,791,484 4.54
Access Road 3"AC/6"AB 31,102 SF $ 3.75 $116,633
Access Ramp 6"PCC/4"AB 9,731 SF $ 24.00 $233,544
Post & Cable Fence 3' LF 2,099 $18.61 $39,062
Erosion Control/Hydroseed
Channels/Basin AC $3,011.97 $36,746 12.2
S/T $4,394,868
Contingency (15%) $659,230
Engineering (20%) $878,974
Phase 1 Total $5,933,072
Phase 2
42" Storm Drain LF 2,830 $ 126.06 $356,750
48" Storm Drain LF 1,625 $ 145.12 $235,820
60" Storm Drain LF 1,990 $ 171.73 $341,743
Manhole 17 EA 6,675.66 $ $113,486
Channel Improvements LF 3,510 $ 250.00 $877,500
Detention Basin 25 AC 150,234.56 $ $3,755,864
Pump Station 33 CFS -$ $0
S/T $5,681,163
Contingency (15%) $852,174
Engineering (20%) $1,136,233
Phase 2 Total $7,669,570
Phase 3
30" Storm Drain LF 1,835 $ 75.30 $138,176
36" Storm Drain LF 930 $ 92.10 $85,653
54" Storm Drain LF 2,430 $ 154.09 $374,439
60" Storm Drain LF 2,610 $ 171.73 $448,215
72" Storm Drain LF 1,265 $ 253.34 $320,475
Manhole 17 LF 6,675.66 $ $113,486
Channel Improvements LF 4,810 $ 250.00 $1,202,500
S/T $2,682,944
Contingency (15%) $402,442
Engineering (20%) $536,589
Phase 3 Total $3,621,974
Phase 4
36" Storm Drain LF 1,065 $ 92.10 $98,087
42" Storm Drain LF 1,810 $ 126.06 $228,169
54" Storm Drain LF 1,375 $ 154.09 $211,874
Manhole 13 EA 6,675.66 $ $86,784
Detention Basin 6 AC 150,234.56 $ $901,407
Pump Station 5 CFS -$ $0
Channel Improvements 6,500 LF $ 250.00 $1,625,000
S/T $3,151,320
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-20 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Contingency (15%) $472,698
Engineering (20%) $630,264
Phase 4 Total $4,254,282
Phase 5
42" Storm Drain LF 4,010 $ 126.06 $505,501
48" Storm Drain LF 1,020 $ 145.12 $148,022
Manhole 16 EA 6,675.66 $ $106,811
Channel Improvements LF 1,750 $ 250.00 $437,500
S/T $1,197,834
Contingency (15%) $179,675
Engineering (20%) $239,567
Phase 5 Total $1,617,075
TOTAL PHASES 1-5 $23,095,973
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-21 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
MAP D.2-1
D-22
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.3-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio del Oro Water System Costs
WATER COST BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST Phase 1
24" Water 1465 LF $238 $349,110
24" Butterfly Valve 1 EA $12,793 $12,793
S/T $361,903
Contingency (15%) $54,285
Engineering (20%) $72,381
Phase 1 Total $488,568
Phase 2
24" Water 9490 LF $238 $2,261,467
24" Butterfly Valve 5 EA $12,793 $63,965
1.5 MG Water Tank 1 EA $1,333,425 $1,333,425
Booster Pump Station 1 EA $1,244,500 $1,244,500
S/T $4,903,357
Contingency (15%) $735,504
Engineering (20%) $980,671
Phse 2 Total $6,619,532
Phase 3
12" Water 2080 LF $118.60 $246,688
12" Butterfly Valve 1 EA $4,309 $4,309
S/T $250,997
Contingency (15%) $37,650
Engineering (20%) $50,199
Phase 3 Total $338,846
Phase 4
12" Water 4395 LF $118.60 $521,247
24" Water 7600 LF $238.30 $1,811,080
12" Butterfly Valve 2 EA $4,309 $8,618
24" Butterfly Valve 2 EA $12,793 $25,586
S/T $2,366,531
Contingency (15%) $354,980
Engineering (20%) $473,306
Phase 4 Total $3,194,817
Phase 5
12" Water 1075 LF $118.60 $127,495
24" Water 3090 LF $238.30 $736,347
12" Butterfly Valve 2 EA $4,309 $8,618
24" Butterfly Valve 2 EA $12,793 $25,586
S/T $898,046
Contingency (15%) $134,707
Engineering (20%) $179,609
Phase 5 Total $1,212,362
TOTAL PHASES 1-5 $11,854,125
Water System Costs
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-23 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.3-2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Water System Credits/Reimbursement
WATER CR/RE BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL CR/RE Phase 1
24" Water 1465 LF $238.30 $349,110
24" Butterfly Valve 1 EA $12,793 $12,793
S/T $361,903
Contingency (15%) $54,285
Engineering (20%) $72,381
Phase 1 Total $488,568
Phase 2
24" Water 9490 LF $238.30 $2,261,467
24" Butterfly Valve 5 EA $12,793 $63,965
1.5 MG Water Tank 1 EA $1,333,425 $1,333,425
Booster Pump Station 1 EA $1,244,500 $1,244,500
S/T $4,903,357
Contingency (15%) $735,504
Engineering (20%) $980,671
Phase 2Total $6,619,532
Phase 3
12" Water 2080 LF 118.60 $ $246,688
12" Butterfly Valve 1 EA 4,309 $ $4,309
S/T $250,997
Contingency (15%) $37,650
Engineering (20%) $50,199
Phase 3 Total $338,846
Phase 4
12" Water 4395 LF 118.60 $ $521,247
24" Water 7600 LF 238.30 $ $1,811,080
12" Butterfly Valve 2 EA 4,309.00 $ $8,618
24" Butterfly Valve 2 EA $12,793 $25,586
S/T $2,366,531
Contingency (15%) $354,980
Engineering (20%) $473,306
Phase 4 Total $3,194,817
Phase 5
12" Water 1075 LF 118.60 $ $127,495
24" Water 3090 LF $238.30 $736,347
12" Butterfly Valve 2 EA 4,309 $ $8,618
24" Butterfly Valve 2 EA $12,793 $25,586
S/T $898,046
Contingency (15%) $134,707
Engineering (20%) $179,609
Phase 5 Total $1,212,362
TOTAL PHASES 1-5 $11,854,125
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-24 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.3-1 D-25 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.3-2 D-26 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.3-3
D-27
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.4-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio del Oro Sewer System Cost
SEWER COST BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST Phase 1
12" Trunk Sewer 4395 LF $ 90.00 $395,550
Manhole 6 EA 11,112.00 $ $66,672
S/T $462,222
Contingency (15%) $69,333
Engineering (20%) $92,444
Total $624,000
Sewer Lift Station (S-70) 1 EA 546,000.00 $ $546,000
S/T $546,000
Contingency (15%) $81,900
Engineering (20%) $109,200
Total $737,100
Phase 1 Total $1,361,100
Phase 2
12" Trunk Sewer 865 LF $ 90.00 $77,850
30" Trunk Sewer 2085 LF $ 297.00 $619,245
36" Trunk Sewer 2020 LF $ 321.00 $648,420
Manhole 12 EA 11,112.00 $ $133,344
S/T $1,478,859
Contingency (15%) $221,829
Engineering (20%) $295,772
TotaL Trunk Sewer $1,996,460
Sewer Lift Station 7.04 MGD 685,000.00 $ $4,822,400
S/T $4,822,400
Contingency (15%) $723,360
Engineering (20%) $964,480
Total Sewer Lift Station $6,510,240
Phase 2 Total $8,506,700
Phase 3
12" Trunk Sewer 2515 LF $ 90.00 $226,350
15" Trunk Sewer 2070 LF $ 182.00 $376,740
Manhole 10 EA 11,112.00 $ $111,120
S/T $714,210
Contingency (15%) $107,132
Engineering (20%) $142,842
Phase 3 Total $964,184
Phase 4
30” Trunk Sewer 4690 LF $ 297.00 $1,392,930
Manhole 8 EA 11,112.00 $ $88,896
S/T $1,481,826
Contingency (15%) $222,274
Engineering (20%) $296,365
Phase 4 Total $2,000,465
Phase 5
36” Trunk Sewer 4210 LF $ 321.00 $1,351,410
Manhole 9 EA 11,112.00 $ $100,008
S/T $1,451,418
Contingency (15%) $217,713
Engineering (20%) $290,284
Total Trunk Sewer Pipe $1,959,414
Sewer System Costs
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-28 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.4-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio del Oro Sewer System Cost
Sewer Lift Station 6.56 MGD 685,000.00 $ $4,493,600
S/T $4,493,600
Contingency (15%) $674,040
Engineering (20%) $898,720
Total Sewer Lift Station $6,066,360
Phase 5 Total $8,025,774
TOTAL PHASES 1-5 $20,858,222
INTERIM FACILITIES
SEWER COST BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST Phase 2
12” Force Main 15000 LF $ 214.00 $3,210,000
18” Force Main 15000 LF $ 303.00 $4,545,000
S/T $3,210,000
Contingency (15%) $481,500
Engineering (20%) $642,000
Phase 2 Total $4,333,500
Phase 3
12" Trunk Sewer 600 LF $ 90.00 $54,000
18" Trunk Sewer 1870 LF $ 195.00 $364,650
Manhole 5 LF 11,112.00 $ $55,560
S/T $474,210
Contingency (15%) $71,132
Engineering (20%) $94,842
Phase 3 Total $640,184
TOTAL INTERIM FACILITIES PHASES 1-5 $4,973,684
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-29 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.4-2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Sewer System Credits/Reimbursments
SEWER CR/RE BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL CR/RE Phase 1
12" Trunk Sewer 4395 LF 90.00 $ $395,550
Manhole 6 EA 11,112.00 $ $66,672
S/T $462,222
Contingency (15%) $69,333
Engineering (20%) $92,444
Total $624,000
Sewer Lift Station (S-70) 1 EA 546,000.00 $ $546,000
S/T $546,000
Contingency (15%) $81,900
Engineering (20%) $109,200
Total $737,100
Phase 1 Total $1,361,100
Phase 2
12" Trunk Sewer 865 LF 90.00 $ $77,850
30" Trunk Sewer 2085 LF 297.00 $ $619,245
36" Trunk Sewer 2020 LF 321.00 $ $648,420
Manhole 12 EA 11,112.00 $ $133,344
S/T $1,478,859
Contingency (15%) $221,829
Engineering (20%) $295,772
Total $1,996,460
Sewer Lift Station 7.04 MGD 685,000.00 $ $4,822,400
S/T $4,822,400
Contingency (15%) $723,360
Engineering (20%) $964,480
Total $6,510,240
Phase 2 Total $8,506,700
Phase 3
12" Trunk Sewer 2515 LF 90.00 $ $226,350
15" Trunk Sewer 2070 LF 182.00 $ $376,740
Manhole 10 EA 11,112.00 $ $111,120
S/T $714,210
Contingency (15%) $107,132
Engineering (20%) $142,842
Phase 3 Total $964,184
Phase 4
30” Trunk Sewer 4690 LF 297.00 $ $1,392,930
Manhole 8 EA 11,112.00 $ $88,896
S/T $1,481,826
Contingency (15%) $222,274
Engineering (20%) $296,365
Phase 4 Total $2,000,465
Phase 5
36” Trunk Sewer 4210 LF 321.00 $ $1,351,410
Manhole 9 EA 11,112.00 $ $100,008
S/T $1,451,418
Contingency (15%) $217,713
Engineering (20%) $290,284
Total Trunk Sewer Pipe $1,959,414
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-30 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Sewer Lift Station 6.56 MGD 685,000.00 $ $4,493,600
S/T $4,493,600
Contingency (15%) $674,040
Engineering (20%) $898,720
Total Sewer Lift Station $6,066,360
Phase 5 Total $8,025,774
TOTAL PHASES 1-5 $20,858,222
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-31 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
INTERIM FACILITIES
SEWER CR/RE BY PHASE QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL CR/RE Phase 2
12” Force Main 15000 LF 214.00 $ $3,210,000
18” Force Main 15000 LF 303.00 $ $4,545,000
S/T $3,210,000
Contingency (15%) $481,500
Engineering (20%) $642,000
Total $4,333,500
Phase 3
12" Trunk Sewer 600 LF 90.00 $ $54,000
18" Trunk Sewer 1870 LF $ 195.00 $364,650
Manhole 5 LF 11,112.00 $ $55,560
S/T $474,210
Contingency (15%) $71,132
Engineering (20%) $94,842
Total $640,184
TOTAL INTERIM FACILITIES PHASES 1-5 $4,973,684
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-32 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!( !(
!
")
")
)
60" SS
EXISTING S-70 LIFT STATION
60'' SS
60'
' SS
FUTURE WHITE ROCKINTERCEPTOR
PROPOSEDNORTHERNLIFT STATION
FUTUREAEROJECT-2INTERCEPTOR
PROPOSEDSOUTHERNLIFT STATION
FUTUREAEROJECT-2INTERCEPTOR
WHITE ROCK ROAD
DOUGLAS ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
RIO DEL ORO
PARKWAY
AM
ERICANOS
BOULEVARD
AMERICANOS BOULEVARD
RIO
DEL
ORO
PARKWAY
INTERNATIONAL
DRIVE
R
A
N
C
H
O
C
O
R
D
O
VA
P
A
R
KWAY
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
RANCHO
CORDOVA
PARKWAY FLOWS TO DOUGLAS
INTERCEPTOR
E
E
18" SS
INTERIMGRAVITYALIGNMENT
30'' SS
33'' SS 33'' SS
36'' SS
36'' SS
36'' SS
21'' SS
24'' SS
27'' SS
12'' SS
10'' SS
27'' SS
30''
SS
30'' SS
12'' SS
30'' SS
33'' SS
12'' SS
15'' SS
12'' SS
12'' SS 12'' SS
12'' SS
60'' SS
60''
SS
27''
SS
27'' SS
27'' SS
30'' SS
285' @ S=0.001
S=0452' @.0006
600' @ S=0.002
658' @ S=0.031
764' @ S=0.01
866' @ S
=0.003
960' @ S=0.01
1,216' @ S=0.001
1,151' @ S=0.0023
1,159' @ S=0.001
1,223' @ S=0.003
1,229' @
S=0.0072
1,244' @ S=0.008
1,263' @ S=0.0006
1,273' @ S=0.016
1,337' @ S=0.0011
1,380' @ S=0.001
1,417' @ S=0.014
1,676' @ S=0.001
1,748' @ S=0.0034
1,805' @ S=0.001
3,473' @
S=0.
001
1,948' @ S=0.0072
2,019' @ S=0.008
2,069' @ S=0.01
2,084' @ S=0.008
2,211' @ S=0.01
2,231' @ S=0.001 2,270' @ S=0.0023
2,324' @
S=0.0048
2,759' @
S=0.
0006
3,242' @ S=0.001
3,383' @ S=0.0036
3,498' @ S=0.0029
5,452' @
S=
0.0006
J:\1000-s\1032-RioDelOro\RioDelOro-OA\GIS\Tasks\Studies\Sewer_Study\Onsite_Sewer_Study_20141020.mxd 10/23/2014 8:26:25 AM jshillinsky ! Sewer Manhole
!( Existing Sewer Manhole
") Lift Station) Existing Lift Station
Proposed Sewer PipeFuture Aeroject-2 InterceptorFuture Whiterock InterceptorSewer Shed MajorSewer Shed MinorProposed Mass Grade Contour
RIO DEL ORO
ONSITE SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
OCTOBER, 2014
PRELIMINARY
0 800 1,600
Feet
NOTES:Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri,DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS,AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, NORTH
MAP D.4-1
D-33
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!(
!(
!
")
")
)
60" SS
EXISTING S-70 LIFT STATION
60'' SS
60'' SS
FUTURE WHITE ROCKINTERCEPTOR
PROPOSEDNORTHERNLIFT STATION
FUTUREAEROJECT-2INTERCEPTOR
PROPOSEDSOUTHERNLIFT STATION
FUTUREAEROJECT-2INTERCEPTOR
WHITE ROCK ROAD
DOUGLAS ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
RIO
DELORO
PARKWAY
AMERICANOS
BOULEVARD
AM
E
RICAN
O
S
B
O
ULEVARD
RIO
DEL ORO
PARKWAY
IN
TER
N
ATIO
NAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE
RANCHO
CORDOVA PARKWAY FLOWS TO DOUGLAS
INTERCEPTOR
E
E
DUAL 18"FORCE MAINSTO BRADSHAWINTERCEPTOR
12" & 18"FORCE MAINSTO BRADSHAWINTERCEPTOR
KILGORE ROAD
ZINFANDEL DRIVE
MATHER BLVD
30'' SS
33'' SS
33'' SS
36'' SS
36'' SS
36'' SS
21'' SS
24'' SS
27'' SS
12'' SS
10'' SS
27'' SS
30'' SS
30'' SS
12'' SS
30'' SS
33'' SS
12'' SS
15'' SS
12'' SS
12'' SS
12'' SS
12'' SS
60'' SS
60'' SS
27'' SS
27'' SS
27'' SS
30'' SS
285' @
S=0.001
S=0.0006
452' @
S=0.002
600' @
S=0.031
658' @
764' @
S=0.01
S=0.003
866' @
960' @ S=0.01
1,216' @
S=0.001
1,151' @ S=0.0023
1,159' @
S=0.001
1,223' @ S=0.003
1,229' @
S=0.0072
1,244' @
S=0.008
1,263' @ S=0.0006
1,273' @ S=0.016
1,337' @ S=0.0011
1,380' @ S=0.001
1,417' @ S=0.014
1,676' @
S=0.001
1,748' @ S=0.0034
1,805' @ S=0.001
3,473' @ S=0.001
1,948' @ S=0.0072
2,019' @ S=0.008
2,069' @ S=0.01
2,084' @
S=0.008
2,211' @ S=0.01
2,231' @ S=0.001
2,270' @ S=0.0023
2,324' @
S=0.0048
2,759' @ S=0.0006
3,242' @ S=0.001
3,383' @ S=0.0036
3,498' @ S=0.0029
5,452' @ S=0.0006
J:\1000-s\1032-RioDelOro\RioDelOro-OA\GIS\Tasks\Studies\Sewer_Study\Offsite_Sewer_Study_20141017.mxd 10/23/2014 6:47:34 AM jshillinsky ! Sewer Manhole
!( Existing Sewer Manhole
") Lift Station) Existing Lift Station
Proposed Sewer PipeFuture Aeroject-2 InterceptorFuture Whiterock InterceptorFuture Zinfandel InterceptorSewer Shed MajorSewer Shed MinorProposed Mass Grade Contour
RIO DEL ORO
OFFSITE SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
OCTOBER, 2014
PRELIMINARY
0 800 1,600
Feet
NOTES:Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri,DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS,AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, NORTH
MAP D.4-2
D-34
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.5-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio Del Oro Open Space and Trails Total Cost Estimate
PHASE QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1. 33.6 AC Open Space-Green Infrastructure $115,000.00 $3,864,000.00
5.1 AC Open Space-Parks $231,000.00 $1,178,100.00
7361 LF Trails $77.00 $566,797.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $5,608,897.00
2. 15.9652 AC Open Space-Green Infrastructure $115,000.00 $1,835,998.00
5.4 AC Open Space-Parks $231,000.00 $1,247,400.00
3900 LF Trails $77.00 $300,300.00
TOTAL PHASE 2 $3,383,698.00
3. 49.0226 AC Open Space-Green Infrastructure $115,000.00 $5,637,599.00 0 AC Open Space-Parks $231,000.00 $0.00
8018 LF Trails $77.00 $617,386.00
TOTAL PHASE 3 $6,254,985.00
4. 56.7678 AC Open Space-Green Infrastructure $115,000.00 $6,528,297.00 5 AC Open Space-Parks $231,000.00 $1,155,000.00
9483 LF Trails $77.00 $730,191.00
TOTAL PHASE 4 $8,413,488.00
5. 17.03 AC Open Space-Green Infrastructure $115,000.00 $1,958,450.00
64.3 AC Open Space-Parks $231,000.00 $14,853,300.00
11958 LF Trails $77.00 $920,766.00
TOTAL PHASE 5 $17,732,516.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $5,608,897.00
TOTAL PHASE 2 $3,383,698.00
TOTAL PHASE 3 $6,254,985.00
TOTAL PHASE 4 $8,413,488.00
TOTAL PHASE 5 $17,732,516.00
TOTAL PRELIMINARY OPINION OF COST $41,393,584.00
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-35 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.5-2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio Del Oro Open Space and Trails Summary
Phase 1 Phase2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Open Space[1] [AC]
Park / Community Park 5.1 5.4 --- 5 64.3
Drainage Parkways --- --- 17.3 36.3 1.1
Landscape Corridors / Greenbelts 21.6 14.32 5 --- 15.93 Open Space Preserve / Wetland Preserve --- --- --- 12 --- Private Recreation --- --- --- --- ---
Storm Water Detention 12 --- 24.9 6 ---
Neighborhood Green Area / Urban Plaza[3] --- 1.65 1.82 2.47 --- Total Open Space 38.7 21.37 49.02 61.77 81.33
Trails[2] [LF]
12' Off Street Trail 2339 3900 3026 --- 9332
10' Off Street Trail 5022 --- 4992 9483 2626
[1] Quantities based on XR_Fill_Prpsd_EX_updated_2020-12-14.dwg [2] Quantities based on Trails and Open Spaces exhibit dated August 30, 2018 [3] Approximate acreage. Final location and acreage to be determined at by T-Map 202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-36 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.5-3
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio Del Oro Green Infrastructure (Open Space-Drainage Parkways-Greenbelts-Detention) Unit Cost
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER AC COST
1. Subgrade Preparation 43,560.0 s.f. $0.15 $6,534.00
2. Excavation/Fine Grading-43,560 SF x 1 Ft x 1/27 1,613.0 c.y. $3.50 $5,645.50
3. Planting-Native Drainage Corridors 43,560 s.f. $1.00 $43,560.00
4. Temporary Irrigation 43,560 s.f. $1.00 $43,560.00
Total $99,299.50
Cost Escalation to 2020 15.59%
Use $115,000.00
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-37 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.5-4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio Del Oro Parks Unit Cost
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER AC COST
1. Subgrade Preparation 43,560.0 s.f. $0.15 $6,534.00
2. Excavation/Fine Grading-43,560 SF x 1 Ft x 1/27 1,613.0 c.y. $3.50 $5,645.50
3. Planting-Parks 43,560 s.f. $2.00 $87,120.00
4. Irrigation-Parks 43,560 s.f. $1.50 $65,340.00
5. Playground Equipment 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
Total $199,639.50
Cost Escalation to 2020 15.59%
Use $231,000.00
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-38 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table D.5-5
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Rio Del Oro Trails Unit Cost
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER LF COST
1. Subgrade Preparation 12.0 s.f. $0.15 $1.80
2. Excavation/Fine Grading 2.0 c.y. $3.50 $7.00
3. Paving 12 s.f. $3.50 $42.00
4. Fencing 1 l.f. $8.00 $8.00
5. DG Shoulder 4 s.f. $2.00 $8.00
Total $66.80
Cost Escalation to 2020 15.59%
Use $77.00
202007 m2 appendices 1/26/2022
D-39 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map D.5-1 D-40 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
2 5
B
3 A
4 Wetlands
C
E
D
1 AMERICANOS TRAIL
NORTH TRAIL
NORTH TRAIL
AMERICANOS
TRAIL
AMERICANOS TRAIL
RIO
TRAIL
PARK LOOP TRAIL
PARK
TRAIL
TRAIL
RIO
ORO
TRAIL
WEST TRAIL
WEST TRAIL
MOR
SON
RI
CREEK
TRAIL
LOOP
DEL
ORO
DEL
VILLAGIO DRIVE
COLLECTOR A
COLLECTOR B
FUTURE
CENTENNIAL
DRIVE EXTENSION
WHITE ROCK ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
INTERNATIONAL
DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
COLLECTOR B
AMERI
BOULEVARD
CANOS
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
EH
EDC
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PARKWAY
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
EH
EDC
AMERI
BOULE
CANOS
VARD
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
1-A
SF
2-A
SF
6-A
SF
9-A
SF
11-A
MD
12-A
MD
13-A
SF
14 B
SF
18-B
MD
19-A
MD
21 P / QP
22 BP 24BP 25-A MP
25-B
CP
65 HD
67-A
SF
66 MD
69-A
BP 70 SWD 71 MP
62 LTC
61 P / QP
58 CP
60 75 HS / MS
MD
78-D
SF
59 MD
92-A
MD
93 HD
89 SWD
90 MD
88 RTC
87 HD
86-A
SF
95 WETLAND
85-A
SF
84 HD
83 VC
82-B
SF
54-A
SF
52 SWD
53 HD
49 SF
48-B
SF
47-A
SF
46-B
MD 45-A
SF
44 PRIVATE
96 WETLAND
97 WETLAND
43 SF
39-A
MD 40
HD
38 VC
36-A
SF
37-A
SF
35-A
SF
57 SF
34 MD
33 HD 32 PARK
31 BP
110 - DP
91 - DP
102 - DP
LOT 58-D
DP
103 - DP
104 - DP
105 - DP
101-B DP
99 - DP
106 GREENBELT
101-A
DP
100-D P
98 - DP
25-D
BP
58-A
CP
55 SF
LOT 58-C
DP
LOT 58-E
DP
4-A
SF
5-A
MP
3-A
SF
50 ES
51 PARK
80 PARK
81 ES
41 PARK
42ES
8 ES
7 PARK
15 16/17 ES
PARK/OS
30 OS / P
76 ES
PARK
68 PARK
25-C
MP
10 MS
56 PARK
67-B
SF
67-C
SF
67-D
SF
69-B
BP
73-A
BP
78-A
SF
78-C
SF
78-E
SF
78-F
SF
78-B
SF
94 RTC
92-B
SF
82-A
SF
82-C
SF
82-D
SF
85-B
SF
111- OS
86-B
SF
46-A
MD
54-B
SF 54-C
SF
63 MP 19-B HD
58-B
CP
48-A
SF
35-B
SF
36-B
HD
37-B
SF
13-B
SF
13-C
SF
13-D
SF
13-E
SF
14 A
SF
14 C
SF
1-B
SF
1-D
SF
1-E
SF
2-B
SF
2-C
SF
9-B
SF
12-B
MD
6-B
SF
6-C
SF
39-B
SF
47-B
SF
45-B
SF
3-B
SF
3-C
SF
4-B
SF
5-B
MP
5-C
MP
92-C
MD
23 RTC 1-C
SF
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
18-A
MD
78-G
SF
78-H
108-A GREENBELT SF
108-B GREENBELT 108-C GREENBELT 108-D GREENBELT
108-F GREENBELT
108-E GREENBELT
67-E
SF
107-A GREENBELT 107-B GREENBELT 107-D GREENBELT 1-F PARK 11-B
MD
54-D
SF
14 D
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
77 107-C
GREENBELT
69-C
BP
73-B
BP
72-A
MP
74-A
GREENBELT
1.9 ± AC (N)
74-B
GREENBELT
6.5 ± AC (N)
GOLD DREDGE WAY
(COLLECTOR C)
72-B MP
8.2 ± AC (N)
72-C MP
7.9 ± AC (N)
72-E MP
6.5 ± AC (N)
72-D MP
6.1 ± AC (N)
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
231 Vernon Street Tel 916.341.7760Roseville, CA 95678 Fax 916.341.7767
AT GRADE STREET CROSSINGUNDER CROSSING
CLASS II BIKE LANECLASS I 10' OFF-STREET TRAIL
NORTH TRAILRIO DEL ORO TRAILPARK LOOP TRAILMORRISON CREEK TRAILLOCATION OF ON-STREET BIKE LANENEIGHBORHOOD BIKE ROUTE TO BESPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT TENTATIVE MAP CLASS I 12' OFF-STREET REGIONAL TRAIL
WEST TRAILAMERICANOS TRAIL
CROSSINGS
GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTUREFUNDED BY CIPLOW FLOW CHANNEL CROSSINGFEASIBILITY OF A TRAIL UNDERCROSSING TO REPLACE AT GRADE STREETCROSSINGS AT THESE LOCATIONS WILL BEEVALUATED AT THE TENTATIVESUBDIVISION MAP OR SCHOOL / PARKDESIGN REVIEW PHASES *
*ACTUAL LOCATION OF TRAIL AND GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING ASSOCIATED WITH COMMUNITY PARK TO BE DETERMINED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE FCUSD AND THE CRPD PRIOR TO DESIGN OF COMMUNITY PARK, SCHOOL SITE AND/OR SEPARATED CROSSING.
PHASE LINE
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPER CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED PHASING PLAN FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE. GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURES TO BE FUNDED AND CONSTRUCTED BY CITY.
Map D.5-2
D-41
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
RECREATION
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
PRESERVE
SF
SF
SF
SF
MD
MD
SF
SF
MD
MD
BP BP MP
CP
HD
SF
MD
SWD
LTC
P / QP
CP
HS / MS
MD
SF
MD
MD
HD
SWD
MD
RTC HD
SF
WETLAND
SF
HD
VC
SF
SF
SWD
HD
SF
SF
SF
MD
SF
PRIVATE
WETLAND
WETLAND
SF
MD
HD
VC
SF
SF
SF
SF
MD
HD PARK
BP
DP
DP
DP
DP
DP DP
DP
DP
GREENBELT
D P
DP
MP
CP
SF
DP
SF
MP
SF
ES
PARK
ES
PARK
ES
ES
PARK
ES
PARK
OS / P
ES
PARK
PARK
MP
MS
PARK
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
RTC
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
OS
SF
MD
SF
SF
HD
SF
SF
HD
SF
OS
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF SF
SF
SF
SF
SFSF
SF
MD
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
MP
MP
MD
RTC
SF
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING
SECURITY PARK
MD
SF
108-A GREENBELT SF
GREENBELT
GREENBELT
SF
GREENBELT
GREENBELT GREENBELT
PARK
MD
SF
SF
109-A
GREENBELT
109-B
GREENBELT
PARK AMERICANOS TRAIL
NORTH TRAIL
NORTH TRAIL
AMERICANOS
TRAIL
AMERICANOS TRAIL
RIO
TRAIL PARK LOOP TRAIL
PARK
TRAIL
TRAIL
RIO
ORO
TRAIL
WEST TRAIL
WEST TRAIL
SUNRISE BOULEVARD
WHITE
ROCK ROAD
RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY
RIO DEL ORO PAR
VILLAGIO DRIVE
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
A MER I CA NOS
BOUL EVA RD
INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
GOLD DREDGE WAY
COLLECTOR A
KWAY
MOR
SON RI
CREEK
TRAIL
LOOP
DEL
ORO
DEL
AMERICANOS BOULEVARD
DOUGLAS ROAD
2 5
B
3 A
4 Wetlands
C
E
D
1 GREENBELT
GREENBELT
MP
BP
BP
BP
MP
BP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
BP
GREENBELT
GREENBELT
CLASS II BIKE LANE
CLASS I 10' OFF-STREET TRAIL
CLASS I 12' OFF-STREET REGIONAL TRAIL
WEST TRAIL
AMERICANOS TRAIL
NORTH TRAILRIO DEL ORO TRAILPARK LOOP TRAILMORRISON CREEK TRAIL
ON-STREET BIKE LANE
LOCATION OFNEIGHBORHOOD BIKE ROUTE TO BE SPECIFICALLYLOCATED AT TENTATIVE MAP COMMUNITY PARKDRAINAGE PARKWAYSLANDSCAPE CORRIDORS / GREENBELTSOPEN SPACE PRESERVE / WETLAND PRESERVESTORM WATER DETENTIONNEIGHBORHOOD GREEN/URBAN PLAZA(LOCATION FLEXIBLE; TBD BY T-MAP)PRIVATE RECREATION
PARK/OPEN SPACE
GREEN STREETS / SEPARATED SIDEWALKNEIGHBORHOOD PASEOSLANDSCAPE CORRIDORS(LOCATION FLEXIBLE; TBD BY T-MAP)(LOCATION FLEXIBLE; TBD BY T-MAP) PARK
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE
DEVELOPER CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED PHASING PLAN
FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE.
PHASE LINE
Map D.5-3
D-42
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDIX E:
Phase 1 Project Phasing Example
Map E-1 Parcel 67 Tentative Subdivision Map Existing Conditions Map E-2 Parcel 67 Tentative Subdivision Map Proposed Conditions Map E-3 Parcel 67 Sub-Phase A Infrastructure Phasing
Map E-4 Parcel 67 Sub-Phase B Infrastructure Phasing
Map E-5 Parcel 67 Sub-Phase C Infrastructure Phasing
Map E-6 Parcel 67 Sub-Phase D Infrastructure Phasing
Map E-7 Parcel 67 Sub-Phase E Infrastructure Phasing
Map E-8 Parcel 67 Bikeway System
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map E-1 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Map E-2 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PARKWAY
CORDOVA
RANCHO
ROCK ROAD WHITE
DETENTION
BASIN
PROPOSED
DRIVE INTERNATIONAL
UNIT 1A
FUTURE
SIGNAL
PROPOSED
SIGNAL
FUTURE
SIGNAL
(110) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
SEWER OUTFALL
TO LUYUNG DRIVE
DRAINAGE
OUTFALL
UNIT 2
(105) 62'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3A
(52) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3B
(55) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1B
(122) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING
ALL WEATHER
ACCESS
& LANDSCAPE AMENITIES
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767
MAY, 2017
RIO DEL ORO
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 67 - SUB-PHASE A INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN
LEGEND
EVA (SECONDARY ACCESS)
NORTH
0 300 600
PROPOSED SIGNAL
FUTURE SIGNAL
SUB-PHASE A IMPROVEMENT AREA
TSM UNIT BOUNDARY
SEWER OUTFALL
DRAINAGE OUTFALL
NOTE:
UNIT 1A (47'X110') 110 LOTS
PHASE A
UNIT 1B (47'X110') 12 LOTS
TOTAL 136 LOTS
PROPOSED DRAINAGE DITCH,
UNIT 2 (62'X110') 14 LOTS
DETENTION BASIN AND LANDSCAPE AMENITIES.
-
-
DETENTION BASIN TO BE
CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES TO LIMIT
FLOW TO SUNRISE BOULEVARD DRAIN
SHED. (AS REQUIRED PER C.O.A.)
UPDATED DRAINAGE ANALYSIS &
BASIN PHASING PLAN TO BE
PROVIDED WITH IMPROVEMENT
PLANS.
Map E-3 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PARKWAY
CORDOVA
RANCHO
ROCK ROAD WHITE
DETENTION
BASIN
PROPOSED
DRIVE INTERNATIONAL
FUTURE
SIGNAL
PROPOSED
SIGNAL
EXISTING SIGNAL
110 ACRE-FT DETENTION
BASIN & PUMP STATION
UNIT 2
(105) 62'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1A
(110) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1B
(122) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3B
(55) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3A
(52) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING
ALL WEATHER
ACCESS
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767
MAY, 2017
RIO DEL ORO
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 67 - SUB-PHASE B INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN
LEGEND
NORTH
0 300 600
EXISTING SIGNAL
FUTURE SIGNAL
TSM UNIT BOUNDARY
PROPOSED SIGNAL
NOTE:
PHASE B
UNIT 3B (75'X110') 8 LOTS
TOTAL 117 LOTS
UNIT 3A (75'X110') 18 LOTS
UNIT 2 (62'X110') 91 LOTS
NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK
SUB-PHASE 'A' INFRASTRUCTURE
WILL BE EXISTING AT THIS POINT OF
PHASING.
NOTE:
SUB-PHASE B IMPROVEMENT AREA
EXISTING/
PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN AND LANDSCAPE
AMENITIES (IF NOT FULLY CONSTRUCTED WITH PHASE 1)
& LANDSCAPE AMENITIES
-
-
DETENTION BASIN TO BE
CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES TO LIMIT
FLOW TO SUNRISE BOULEVARD DRAIN
SHED. (AS REQUIRED PER C.O.A.)
UPDATED DRAINAGE ANALYSIS &
BASIN PHASING PLAN TO BE
PROVIDED WITH IMPROVEMENT
PLANS.
Map E-4 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PARKWAY
CORDOVA
RANCHO
ROCK ROAD WHITE
DETENTION
BASIN
PROPOSED
DRIVE INTERNATIONAL
FUTURE
SIGNAL
EXISTING
SIGNAL
EXISTING SIGNAL
DRAINAGE
OUTFALL
UNIT 3A
(52) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1A
(110) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS UNIT 2
(105) 62'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3B
(55) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1B
(122) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING
ALL WEATHER
ACCESS
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767
MAY, 2017
RIO DEL ORO
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 67 - SUB-PHASE C INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN
LEGEND
NORTH
0 300 600
EXISTING SIGNAL
FUTURE SIGNAL
SUB-PHASE C IMPROVEMENT AREA
TSM UNIT BOUNDARY
SUB-PHASE 'A' & 'B'
INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE EXISTING
AT THIS POINT OF PHASING.
NOTE:
NOTE:
PHASE C
UNIT 3B (75'X110') 8 LOTS
TOTAL 42 LOTS
UNIT 3A (75'X110') 34 LOTS
DRAINAGE OUTFALL
PROPOSED DRAINAGE DITCH
EXISTING/
& LANDSCAPE AMENITIES
-
-
DETENTION BASIN TO BE
CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES TO LIMIT
FLOW TO SUNRISE BOULEVARD DRAIN
SHED. (AS REQUIRED PER C.O.A.)
UPDATED DRAINAGE ANALYSIS &
BASIN PHASING PLAN TO BE
PROVIDED WITH IMPROVEMENT
PLANS.
Map E-5 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PARKWAY
CORDOVA
RANCHO
ROCK ROAD WHITE
DETENTION
BASIN
PROPOSED
DRIVE INTERNATIONAL
FUTURE
SIGNAL
EXISTING
SIGNAL
EXISTING SIGNAL
UNIT 1A
(110) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 2
(105) 62'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3A
(52) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1B
(122) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3B
(55) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING
ALL WEATHER
ACCESS
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767
MAY, 2017
RIO DEL ORO
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 67 - SUB-PHASE D INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN
LEGEND
NORTH
0 300 600
EXISTING SIGNAL
FUTURE SIGNAL
SUB-PHASE D IMPROVEMENT AREA
TSM UNIT BOUNDARY
SUB-PHASE 'A', 'B' AND 'C'
INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE EXISTING AT
THIS POINT OF PHASING.
NOTE:
NOTE:
PHASE D
UNIT 1B (47'X110') 20 LOTS
TOTAL 59 LOTS
UNIT 3B (75'X110') 39 LOTS
EXISTING/
& LANDSCAPE AMENITIES
-
-
DETENTION BASIN TO BE
CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES TO LIMIT
FLOW TO SUNRISE BOULEVARD DRAIN
SHED. (AS REQUIRED PER C.O.A.)
UPDATED DRAINAGE ANALYSIS &
BASIN PHASING PLAN TO BE
PROVIDED WITH IMPROVEMENT
PLANS.
Map E-6 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PARKWAY
CORDOVA
RANCHO
ROCK ROAD WHITE
DETENTION
BASIN
PROPOSED
DRIVE INTERNATIONAL
FUTURE
SIGNAL
EXISTING
SIGNAL
EXISTING SIGNAL
UNIT 1A
(110) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 2
(105) 62'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3A
(52) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 3B
(55) 75'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
UNIT 1B
(122) 47'X110' (TYP.) LOTS
FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING
ALL WEATHER
ACCESS
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767
MAY, 2017
RIO DEL ORO
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 67 - SUB-PHASE E INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN
LEGEND
NORTH
0 300 600
EXISTING SIGNAL
FUTURE SIGNAL
TSM UNIT BOUNDARY
SUB-PHASE 'A', 'B', 'C' AND 'D'
INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE EXISTING AT
THIS POINT OF PHASING.
NOTE:
NOTE:
PHASE E
UNIT 1B (47'X110') 90 LOTS
TOTAL 90 LOTS
SUB-PHASE E IMPROVEMENT AREA
EXISTING/
& LANDSCAPE AMENITIES
-
-
DETENTION BASIN TO BE
CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES TO LIMIT
FLOW TO SUNRISE BOULEVARD DRAIN
SHED. (AS REQUIRED PER C.O.A.)
UPDATED DRAINAGE ANALYSIS &
BASIN PHASING PLAN TO BE
PROVIDED WITH IMPROVEMENT
PLANS.
Map E-7 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PARKWAY
CORDOVA
RANCHO
ROCK ROAD WHITE
DETENTION
BASIN
PROPOSED
DRIVE INTERNATIONAL
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767
MAY 30, 2017
RIO DEL ORO
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 67 - BIKEWAY SYSTEM EXHIBIT
LEGEND
NORTH
0 300 600
FUTURE GRADE
SEPARATED CROSSING
FUNDED BY CIP.
CLASS I
10' "NORTH TRAIL"
CLASS I
12' "WEST TRAIL"
ADDITIONAL
CLASS III
BIKE ROUTES NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK
FUTURE GRADE
SEPARATED CROSSING
FUNDED BY CIP.
CLASS I 10' BIKE/
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
FUTURE CLASS III
BIKE ROUTE CONNECTION
CLASS III BIKE ROUTE (PER RDOSP EXHIBIT 4-6)
CLASS III BIKE ROUTE (ADDITIONAL PROVIDED
CLASS I WEST TRAIL (PER RDOSP EXHIBIT 4-6)
WEST TRAIL CONNECTION (ADDITIONAL
PROVIDED)
FUTURE CLASS I
CONNECTION
CLASS I NORTH TRAIL (PER RDOSP EXHIBIT 4-6)
Map E-8 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
APPENDIX F:
White Rock Road Cost Detail
Table F-1 Overall Cost Share Estimate—White Rock Road ....... F-1 Table F-2 Phase I Cost Sharing Details ................................. F-2 Table F-3 Cost Share Estimate—White Rock Road–
Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho
Cordova Parkway (3 pages) .................................. F-3 Table F-4 Cost Share Estimate—White Rock Road–
Fitzgerald Road to West Elliott Boundary &
East of Elliott/Aerojet Boundary (4 pages) .............. F-6 Table F-5 Cost Share Estimate—White Rock Road–
Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho
Cordova Parkway (2 pages) ................................ F-10 Table F-6 Rio del Oro White Rock Road Costs and
Credits/Reimbursements .................................... F-12 Table F-7 Rio del Oro Major White Rock Road
Developer Costs ................................................ F-13 Table F-8 White Rock Road Intersection Costs and
Credits/Reimbursements .................................... F-14 Table F-9 White Rock Road—Aerojet Portion
Drainage Costs ................................................. F-15 Exhibit F-1 White Rock Road—Surface Improvements
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table F-1
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Overall Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road
CITY COST + ELLIOTT COST
(PER DA'S) [2] [3] [4] = TOTAL COST
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $5,759,592 + $972,427 = $6,732,018 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $1,359,769 + $304,465 = $1,664,234 JOINT TRENCH $0 + $600,148 = $600,148
TOTAL $7,119,361 + $1,877,039 = $8,996,400
CITY COST + DEVELOPER COST
(PER DA'S) [7] = TOTAL COST [6] [8]
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $10,112,044 + $3,226,693 = $13,338,737 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $1,136,134 + $1,100,946 = $2,237,080 JOINT TRENCH $0 + $1,188,326 $1,188,326
TOTAL $11,248,178 + $5,515,965 = $16,764,144
CITY COST + DEVELOPER = TOTAL COST
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $15,871,636 + $4,199,120 = $20,070,756 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $2,495,903 + $1,405,411 = $3,901,314 JOINT TRENCH $0 $1,788,474 $1,788,474
TOTAL $18,367,539 + $7,393,005 = $25,760,544
[2] See Table F-2 for detail on cost sharing for Phase I. [6] Per Table F-6 and F-7, adjusted with current costs
[7] Per Finance Plan Table B-5 (98' R.O.W-WRR) for developer pay items only and adjusted with current costs [8] Per 2013 Rancho Cordova Fee Program 2013 Update adjusted with current costs [9] Per 2013 Rancho Cordova Fee Program 2013 Update & Rancho Cordova Storm Drain Schedule PHASE 1
WEST RDO BOUNDARY TO ELLIOTT/AEROJET PROPERTY LINE [4964 LF] [1] Unit prices based on WRR Phase 1 awarded project bid
AEROJET/EASTON PORTION
ELLIOTT/AEROJET PROPRTY LINE TO EAST RDO BOUNDARY [9829 LF]
TOTAL WRR
(WEST RDO BOUNDARY TO EAST RDO BOUNDARY) [14793 LF]
[5] Per WRR Phase 1 Improvement Plans and awarded project bid amount [3] Per 2019 Develpoment Agreement & White Rock Road Surface Improvements Elliott Pay Items Exhibit [4] Per Rio Del Oro - White Rock Road Storm Drain Cost Breakdown and Credits by CORC 202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-1 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table F-2
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.
Phase I Cost Sharing Details
Elliott
Direct
Elliott to
City TOTAL
Surface n/a $972,427 $972,427
Joint Trench $600,148 n/a $600,148
Drainage n/a $304,465 $304,465
TOTAL $600,148 $1,276,892 $1,877,039
F-2 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table F-3
Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Quantity (Total) Total Elliott Portion Costs Quantity (East of RCP) Unit Price Amount (East of RCP) Quantity (West of RCP) Amount (West of RCP) Notes 1 Mobilization LS 1 $555,000.00 $ 555,000.00
2 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 0.18 $18,000.00 0.09 $100,000.000 $9,000.00 0.09 $9,000.00 Proportion of hard construction cost. Split b/w East and West based on LF proportion
3 Construction Staking LS 1 $150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 0.18 $27,000.00 0.09 $150,000.000 $13,500.00 0.09 $13,500.00 Proportion of hard construction cost. Split b/w East and West based on LF proportion 4 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1 $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 0.18 $2,700.00 0.09 $15,000.000 $1,350.00 0.09 $1,350.00 Proportion of hard construction cost. Split b/w East and West based on LF proportion5 Temporary Check Dam LF 4,880 $3.00 $ 14,640.00 6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 51 $115.00 $ 5,865.00 19.00 $2,185.00 9.00 $115.000 $1,035.00 10.00 $1,150.00 7 Fiber Roll LF 12,050 $2.20 $ 26,510.00 1943.00 $4,274.60 1943.00 $2.200 $4,274.60 0.00 $0.00 Only adjacent to Parcels 65 and 66. Elliott constructing landscape adjacent to Parcel 67.
8 Hydroseed ACRE 6 $2,600.00 $ 15,600.00 1.200 $3,120.00 1.20 $2,600.000 $3,120.00 0.00 $0.00 Only adjacent to Parcels 65 and 66. Elliott constructing landscape adjacent to Parcel 67. 9 Traffic Control System LS 1 $574,714.50 $ 574,714.50 0.18 $103,448.61 0.09 $574,714.500 $51,724.31 0.09 $51,724.31 Proportion of hard construction cost. Split b/w East and West based on LF proportion 10 Construction Area Signs LS 1 $25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 0.18 $4,500.00 0.09 $25,000.000 $2,250.00 0.09 $2,250.00 Proportion of hard construction cost. Split b/w East and West based on LF proportion 11 Alternative Temporary Crash Cushion EA 1 $2,550.00 $ 2,550.00 0.18 $459.00 0.18 $2,550.000 $459.00 0.00 $0.0012 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF 950 $25.00 $ 23,750.00 69.91 $1,747.75 69.91 $25.000 $1,747.75 0.00 $0.00 13 Temporary High-Visibility Fence LF 350 $2.30 $ 805.00 350.00 $805.00 350.00 $2.300 $805.00 0.00 $0.00 Located on southside east of RCP.14 Roadway Excavation (F) CY 54,900 $12.50 $ 686,250.00 1536.00 $19,200.00 723.00 $12.500 $9,037.50 813.00 $10,162.5015 Unsuitable Material Excavation and Replacement (Contingency) CY 2,700 $21.00 $ 56,700.00 16 Remove Base and Surfacing SF 27,110 $2.00 $ 54,220.00 17 Remove Sidewalk LF 465 $6.75 $ 3,138.75 18 Remove Curb and Gutter LF 565 $6.75 $ 3,813.75 19 Remove Curb Ramp EA 6 $500.00 $ 3,000.00 20 Remove Culvert LF 40 $40.00 $ 1,600.00 21 Remove Fence LF 10,050 $1.50 $ 15,075.00 22 Remove Barricade EA 4 $450.00 $ 1,800.00 23 Remove Sign EA 15 $100.00 $ 1,500.00 24 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 18,430 $66.00 $ 1,216,380.00 459.00 $30,294.00 190.00 $66.000 $12,540.00 269.00 $17,754.00 Refer to surface exhibit. 25 Place HMA Dike (Type A) LF 45 $11.00 $ 495.00
26 Place HMA Dike (Type E) LF 970 $14.00 $ 13,580.00 27 Place HMA Overside Drain EA 2 $1,100.00 $ 2,200.00 28 Cold Plane AC Pavement SY 12,660 $2.75 $ 34,815.00 29 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 26,620 $30.00 $ 798,600.00 998.00 $29,940.00 300.00 $30.000 $9,000.00 698.00 $20,940.00 AB includes streets, curb ramps, C&G, sidewalk where attached. 30 Shoulder Backing TON 340 $45.00 $ 15,300.00
31 PCC Type 2 Curb & Gutter LF 7,090 $25.00 $ 177,250.00 4801.00 $120,025.00 2577.00 $25.000 $64,425.00 2224.00 $55,600.00 32 PCC Type 3 Curb LF 210 $65.00 $ 13,650.00
33 PCC Type 5 Curb LF 10,040 $15.00 $ 150,600.00 34 PCC Cross Gutter SF 610 $60.00 $ 36,600.00 35 PCC Driveway SF 760 $14.00 $ 10,640.00 36 PCC Sidewalk SF 12,300 $10.00 $ 123,000.00 4197.00 $41,970.00 2571.00 $10.000 $25,710.00 1626.00 $16,260.00 Where attached only. 37 PCC Stamped & Colored SF 5,150 $17.00 $ 87,550.00
38 Curb Ramp EA 34 $3,700.00 $ 125,800.00 10.00 $37,000.00 6.00 $3,700.000 $22,200.00 4.00 $14,800.00 39 Detectable Warning Surface EA 34 $525.00 $ 17,850.00 10.00 $5,250.00 6.00 $525.000 $3,150.00 4.00 $2,100.00 40 Adjust Valve to Finished Grade EA 1 $850.00 $ 850.00 41 Adjust Manhole to Finished Grade EA 12 $1,200.00 $ 14,400.00 42 Sidewalk Barricade EA 2 $750.00 $ 1,500.00
AWARDED BID ELLIOTT PORTION
F-3
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table F-3
Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Quantity (Total) Total Elliott Portion Costs Quantity (East of RCP) Unit Price Amount (East of RCP) Quantity (West of RCP) Amount (West of RCP) Notes
AWARDED BID ELLIOTT PORTION
43 Street Closure Barricade EA 4 $2,000.00 $ 8,000.00
44 Type II Barricade EA 10 $50.00 $ 500.00 45 Type III Barricade EA 40 $110.00 $ 4,400.00 46 Security Fence LF 5,200 $27.30 $ 141,960.00 47 16’ Security Gate EA 4 $3,050.00 $ 12,200.00 48 Fence (Type BW) LF 510 $14.00 $ 7,140.00 49 16’ Wire Mesh Gate EA 1 $1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 50 Decorative Metal Fence LF 65 $259.00 $ 16,835.00 51 Decorative Metal Gate EA 1 $20,150.00 $ 20,150.00 52 Midwest Guardrail System LF 125 $57.00 $ 7,125.00 53 Alternative In-Line Terminal System EA 2 $3,700.00 $ 7,400.00 54 Type B Drop Inlet EA 22 $3,000.00 $ 66,000.00 55 OCP Drop Inlet EA 9 $3,100.00 $ 27,900.00 56 OMP Drop Inlet EA 11 $2,000.00 $ 22,000.00 57 12” C900 PVC Pipe LF 1,850 $90.00 $ 166,500.00 58 18” C900 PVC Pipe LF 990 $130.00 $ 128,700.00 59 24” C900 PVC Pipe LF 1,500 $185.00 $ 277,500.00 60 15” Class III RCP LF 155 $75.00 $ 11,625.00 61 30” HDPE Pipe LF 735 $105.00 $ 77,175.00 62 42” HDPE Pipe LF 2,270 $150.00 $ 340,500.00 63 48” Storm Drain Manhole EA 11 $6,900.00 $ 75,900.00 64 60” Storm Drain Manhole EA 13 $9,000.00 $ 117,000.00 65 15” Flared End Section EA 2 $1,400.00 $ 2,800.00 66 Install 8” DIP (Restrained) LF 115 $120.00 $ 13,800.00 67 Install 10” DIP (Restrained) LF 470 $110.00 $ 51,700.00 68 Install 12” DIP LF 690 $80.00 $ 55,200.00 69 Install 12” DIP (Restrained) LF 570 $200.00 $ 114,000.00 70 Install 16” DIP LF 2,180 $115.00 $ 250,700.00 71 Install 16” DIP (Restrained) LF 610 $250.00 $ 152,500.00 72 Install 24” DIP LF 2,060 $145.00 $ 298,700.00 73 Install 24” DIP (Restrained) LF 870 $425.00 $ 369,750.00 74 Install 30” DIP (Restrained) LF 82 $675.00 $ 55,350.00 75 Install 10” Gate Valve EA 2 $3,400.00 $ 6,800.00 76 Install 12” Butterfly Valve EA 11 $5,500.00 $ 60,500.00 77 Install 16” Butterfly Valve EA 5 $8,900.00 $ 44,500.00 78 Install 24” Butterfly Valve EA 6 $20,000.00 $ 120,000.00 79 Install 30” Butterfly Valve EA 1 $35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 80 Install 4” In-Line Blow Off Assembly EA 2 $7,300.00 $ 14,600.00 81 Install 4” Temporary Blow Off Assembly EA 3 $6,400.00 $ 19,200.00 82 Install 6” Temporary Blow Off Assembly EA 2 $23,000.00 $ 46,000.00 83 Install 8” Temporary Blow Off Assembly EA 3 $19,000.00 $ 57,000.00 84 Install 1” Combo Air Release / Vacuum Assembly EA 1 $4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 85 Install 2” Combo Air Release / Vacuum Assembly EA 1 $8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 86 Install Wire Locating Station EA 5 $1,100.00 $ 5,500.00 87 Install Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 5 $12,500.00 $ 62,500.00 88 Reconnect 6” Water Service EA 1 $19,000.00 $ 19,000.00 89 Tie-In to Existing Pipelines EA 3 $8,000.00 $ 24,000.00 90 Disinfection and Testing LS 1 $150,000.00 $ 150,000.00
DIRECT REIMBURSEMENT FROM SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY TO CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA SEE TABLE F-9 FOR
DETAILS $304,465.00
SEE TABLE F-9 FOR DETAILS
COSTS REFLECT HARD CONSTRUCTION COSTS LESS CITY ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE FEE PROGRAM CREDITS.
F-4
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution