Rancho Cordova City Council
March 21, 2022

STOP G 2,800 SF S-1A 6,000 SF
DOUGLAS ROAD LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SCF 1" = 20'0" LP-1.2 15 Know what's below Call before you dig. CLIENT: PROJECT: ISSUE DATE DRAWN : CHECKED : SCALE: : SHEET TITLE: SHEET OF SHEETS 12345 JOB NO. : SCF FUHRMAN LEAMY LAND GROUP D3h5GN ¥ h3Rg5B3 ¥ hOLUD5ONh 2140 PROFESSIONAL DRIVE, SUITE 115 ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661 916.783.5263 ȏ fllandgroup.com REVISIONS DATE 678910 RSC.17034 ANATOLIA RETAIL PHASE 1 RSC ENGINEERING ROSEVILLE, CA SUNRISE BLVD. RANCHO CORDOVA,CA 16 1ST PC SUBMITTAL 11/13/17 2ND PC SUBMITTAL 3/12/18 3RD SUBMITTTAL 5/2/18 4TH SUBMITTAL 5/17/18 5TH SUBMITTAL 6/14/18 7TH SUBMITTAL 6/05/20 6TH SUBMITTAL 4/15/20 8.21.2020 8TH SUBMITTAL 8/21/20 GENERAL PLANTING NOTES FUTURE PHASE 2 LIMIT OF WORK - PHASE 1 MATCHLINE - SEE LP-1.1 FUTURE PHASE 2 LIMIT OF WORK ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Transportation Engineers
3853 Taylor Road, Suite G • Loomis, CA 95650 • (916) 660-1555 November 30, 2021
Mr. Russ Orsi
Dutch Bros.

Construction Manager
916-765-7270
[email protected]
RE: TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT FOR CA-3004 DUTCH BROTHERS RESTAURANT ON DOUGLAS ROAD, RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA.

Dear Mr. Orsi:

Thank you for contacting our firm regarding the Dutch Brothers coffee kiosk proposed in the approved Anatolia Marketplace shopping center on Douglas Road in Rancho Cordova. As we are aware the project is a 950 sf restaurant with dual entry drive-thru aisles that would replace building S-1A within the approved center.

City of Rancho Cordova staff has indicated that an initial assessment of project trip generation is needed in order to determine whether the Dutch Brothers restaurant is consistent with the assumptions for site development made when the Anatolia Marketplace was approved. An assessment of drive-thru queueing has also been requested. This letter provides the information requested by the City.

Previous Assumptions for Lot 2
Year 2021 Assessment of Anatolia Marketplace. The project site was included in a recent assessment of the feasibility of left turn access from Douglas Road into Anatolia Marketplace1. The approved site plan is noted in Figure 1. Building S-1A was assumed to be occupied by 5,000 sf of general retail uses. Building S-1A trip generation was estimated from rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, Volume 1 and pass-by trip assumptions were based on Users Guide and Handbook. 3rd Edition, 2017. After applying those rates the retail building was expected to generate a gross total of 301 daily, 10 a.m. and 27 p.m. peak hour trips. “Pass-by trips” drawn from the stream of traffic already passing on Douglas Road could reduce that estimate to 256 daily, 8 a.m. and 23 p.m. peak hour primary trips made by customers and employees for the specific purpose of visiting the site.

Dutch Brothers Project Trip Generation Forecasts
Institute of Transportation Engineers Rates. The amount of vehicular traffic associated with the Dutch Brothers project has been estimated on a peak hour basis from two perspectives. First, trip generation rates for coffee related uses that are presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition and 11th Edition were identified and reviewed to determine whether this 1 Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment for Westbound Left Turns Anatolia Marketplace Access intersection on Douglas Road, KDA, September 13, 2021
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Mr. Russ Orsi
Dutch Bros
November 30, 2021

data is applicable to the proposed Dutch Brothers project. As indicated in Table 1, rates are available for two coffee related uses with drive-thru lanes. Code 938 is a Coffee / Donut Shop with Drive-Thru and No Indoor Seating. While that description does match Dutch Brothers, all the data provided by ITE was collected at very small kiosks (100 sf) that generated 10 to 60 peak hour trips. Because these kiosks were so small their “per ksf” trip generation rates would greatly exaggerate a forecast for the larger Dutch Brothers building. Additional data was collected for the 11th Edition, but that data reports trip generation rates on a “per drive-thru aisle” basis without regard for the size of the building.

Alternatively, Code 937 is a Coffee / Donut Shop with Drive-Thru at sites where indoor seating is available. In this case the ITE data was collected at sites that ranged from 1,000 to 2,500 sf, but while the Dutch Brothers project does not offer indoor seating the forecasts from these “per ksf” trip rates may be somewhat helpful in understanding the trip generation characteristic of the Dutch Brothers project.

Dutch Brothers Data. As an alternative method, we have assembled available trip generation information specific to the Dutch Brothers operation (i.e., 865 sf with dual drive-thru aisles) and determined a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation forecasts from that perspective. As noted in Table 1, a 2019 report prepared by another firm included a survey of a similar Dutch Brothers in Stockton, California, and our firm surveyed three Dutch Brothers sites in Northern California 2020 - 2021. Average a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation rates were created from that data, and these results generally fall between the rates identified by Code 938 and Code 937 in the morning peak hour but are higher than either rate in the evening peak hour.

Peak Hour Trip Generation Forecasts. As indicated in Table 2, based on the data collected we expect that the proposed 950 sf Dutch Brothers project could generate 141 gross trips in the a.m. peak hour and 115 trips in the evening peak hour.

Daily Trip Generation. Data specific to the Dutch Brothers restaurant is not available on a daily basis, and we have typically estimated the business’s daily trip generation based on the characteristics of other coffee related uses. The sum of a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation rates has been compared to the available daily trip generation rates to suggest a factor that can be applied to the available Dutch Brothers peak hour data. For Code 938, 10th Edition (small kiosks) the sum of peak hour rates represents 21.3% of the daily rate. Using 11th Edition data the two peak periods are 30.6% of the daily rate. For Code 937 (Coffee Shop with seating), the sum equals 23.4% of the daily traffic, while for Code 934 (Fast-Food with Drive-Thru), the sum is equal to 16.6 % of the daily trip generation. The lower the percentage the more traffic caused during non-peak hours. Based on these relationships we conservatively estimate that the sum of Dutch Brothers a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation forecasts would be 16% of its daily traffic. We estimate that Dutch Brothers will generate 1,600 daily trips (i.e., (141+115) / 0.16 = 1,600). Again, this forecast is similar to but greater than the projection for the building as a whole based on ITE Code 937 data.

Pass-by Trips. A share of the trips generated by retail and service-related uses is often drawn from the stream of traffic already passing the business. These “pass-by” trips would be made by customers who simply turn into and out of Dutch Brothers as a part of another trip. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3 rd Edition presents pass-by trip rates based on interviews with patrons at various businesses, and this data was reviewed. In this case pass-by rates for two land use categories may be applicable. Pass-by rates are presented for Code 938 (10th Edition), and pass-by trips comprised 89% of the p.m. peak hour trips made at the small coffee kiosks included in that study. Similarly, pass-by trip rates for Code 934 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru are 49% of the a.m. and 50% of the p.m. trips for that use.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Mr. Russ Orsi
Dutch Bros
November 30, 2021

Recognizing that the pass-by trip characteristics of Dutch Brothers likely fall somewhere between these two published rates, we anticipate that 75% of the trips generated by the Dutch Brothers restaurant will be pass-by trips drawn from the 14,833 vehicles per day we counted on Douglas Road east of Sunrise Blvd this year. The remaining 400 daily, 35 a.m. and 29 p.m. peak hour trips would be made by customers for the primary purpose of visiting Dutch Brothers.

Trip Generation Conclusions
Table 2 identifies the total trip generation associated with the Dutch Brothers kiosk and compares the forecast to information for the approved retail use. As noted, the Dutch Brothers restaurant would generate more total trips than the approved use. However, because a greater share of these trips would be pass-by, the Dutch Brothers would generate only 149 additional primary daily trips made specially for the purpose of vising the site, with 25 more primary trips in the a.m. peak hour and 1 more primary trip in the p.m. peak hour. Thus, while specific driveway volumes associated with the proposed use may be higher, the effects of the proposed project on the regional circulation system would be similar to those previously identified, as the increases are less than the 1,000 daily trip and 100 peak hour trip thresholds used by the City. No further analysis of regional project effects should be needed.

Site Plan Review
The Dutch Brothers facilities are located immediately west of a mid-block right-turn-only driveway located between the Sunrise Blvd intersection and the Marketplace’s eastern driveway where inbound left turns are allowed, as shown in Figure 2. The entrance to the Dutch Brothers parking spaces and drive-thru aisles is located just off an internal intersection that itself is about 200 feet from Douglas Road. That intersection also connects Dutch Brothers to the eastern left-turn-in driveway. Dutch Brothers will have inbound access via a connection to the first east-west circulating aisle parallel to Douglas Road and via a second connection to the west beyond the adjoining S-1B building (Dentist Office / Fast Casual Restaurant). Exiting traffic could return to eastbound Douglas Road via the same driveway or continue through Anatolia Marketplace to reach Sunrise Blvd.

Drive-thru Queueing. We have assembled available information regarding the queuing characteristics of Dutch Brothers restaurants with dual drive-thru aisles in order to confirm the adequacy of the proposed site plan. As shown in the attached plan, the proposed Dutch Brothers has room for 5 vehicles approaching the delivery window and another 5 or 7 vehicles in each of the two entry aisles, for a total of 18 vehicles that can be stored inside the designated queueing areas. Dutch Brothers staff regularly takes in-line orders and delivers products during peak periods, and the exit pass-thru lane allows customers who have been serviced while still in line the opportunity to proceed around a time-consuming-order at the pick-up window.

As indicated in Table 3, drive-thru queues were measured at four other Dutch Brothers restaurants. Each is equipped with dual entry aisles and an exit pass-thru lane. This table identifies the maximum queue observed behind the ordering board in each lane and the maximum number of vehicles queueing at one time. As shown, the largest number of concurrent vehicles was in a range of 13 to 16 vehicles, and the 18 vehicles accommodated on the proposed site has the capacity for those totals. Thus, the design should be adequate.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Mr. Russ Orsi
Dutch Bros
November 30, 2021

Dutch Brothers typically monitors the effects of peak period queuing near its drive-thru entrances, and if excessive queues occur temporary traffic controls are implemented to direct incoming customers to alternative routes that stretch out the queue at an acceptable location. Temporary controls are preferable to permanent changes that limit access to all businesses at other times. The site layout can facilitate a temporary control plan by limiting access at the eastern connection to the east-west aisle and directing arriving traffic to the western connection about 250 feet away. From that point traffic to the drive-thru would turn into the east-west aisle adjoining the buildings, and any extra queue can be accommodated in this area (10 more cars). The area around the drive-thru entrance could also be marked “KEEP CLEAR” to inform customers of the need to avoid queuing and to set the stage for the time periods when temporary control goes into effect. Because peak coffee sales typically occur in the morning when most retail businesses and casual dining restaurants are not open, a temporary control plan can be implemented without appreciably affecting the coffee business’s neighbors. However, traffic that was destined for other businesses can still access storefront parking via the western connection if needed.

Overall, the project plan has the capacity to accommodate anticipated queuing on site, and if a longer queue was to occur, the aisle through the parking lot has the length to ensure that any backup would not reach a public street or interfere with overall shopping center access to Douglas Blvd.

Thank you for contacting our firm. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Kenneth D. Anderson, P.E.

President
Attachments: Tables 1 - 3, Dutch Brothers Site Plan, Anatolia Marketplace Plan Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Brothers 11 30 21.ltr
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

TABLE 1

DUTCH BROTHERS TRIP GENERATION RATES
Location
Size
(sf) Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound Trips
Rate
per ksf
Pass-by
Rate Inbound Outbound Trips
Rate
per ksf
Pass-by
Rate
Dutch Brothers Data Specific to 800+ sf model with dual drive thru Stockton, CA1 810 53% 47% 120 148.10 44% 56% 70 86.42
Sacramento, CA2 865 48% 52% 120 138.72 47% 53% 112 129.48 Roseville, CA3 865 52% 48% 114 131.79 50% 50% 66 76.30
Turlock, CA4 835 52% 48% 145 173.65 50% 50% 162 194.01
Average 51% 49% 125 148.07 48% 52% 103 121.55
ITE Data
ITE Code 9385 2,000.00 50% 50% 10 to 60 337.04 50% 50% 83.33 89% ITE Code 9386 179.00 50% 50% 50 to 150 39.81 50% 50% 5 to 110 15.03 ITE Code 9377 533.57 51% 49% 50 to 400 85.90 50% 50% 30 to 150 38.99 ITE Code 9348 467.48 51% 49% 20 to 500 44.61 49% 52% 48% 20 to 400 33.03 50% 1 Crane Transportation Group, survey of Stockton CA site 10/3/2019 2 4250 El Camino Avenue, Sacramento, CA 11/3/2020
3 2348 Sunrise Blvd, Roseville, CA 11/3/2020
4 1201 W. Monte Vista Ave, Turlock, CA, June 15, 2021
5 Coffee / Donut Shop with Drive-Thru and No Indoor Dining, 10th Edition. All samples are 100 sf 6 Coffee / Donut Shop with Drive-Thru and No Indoor Dining, 11th Edition. 7 Coffee / Donut Shop with Drive-Thru, 11th Edition. Samples ranged from 1,000 to 2,500 sf 8 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru, 11th Edition
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

TABLE 2
SITE S-1A TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
Land Use
Size
(sf) Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound Trips
Rate
per ksf
Pass-by
Rate Inbound Outbound Trips
Rate
per ksf
Pass-by
Rate
Approved use
Strip Retail
(Code 822)
5,000 272 7 5 12 2.36 17 16 33 6.59
Pass-by 41 2 15% 5 15%
Primary 231 10 28
Projections for Proposed Dutch Brothers
Estimate for
Dutch Brothers
Kiosk
950 1,600 72 69 141 148.07 55 60 115 121.55
Pass-by 1,200 53 53 106 75% 43 43 86 75%1
Primary 400 19 16 35 12 17 29
Change from Approved Use
Total Trips +1,328 +129 +82
Total Primary Trips +169 +25 +1
1 assumed average of rates for Code 938 and Code 934 values ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

TABLE 3

DUTCH BROTHERS DRIVE THRU QUEUE REPORTS WITH DUAL DRIVE THRU Location Time Period
Pick Up
Window
Entry Aisle
#1 #2 Total Vehicles
Sacramento, CA AM 3 5 5 13
PM 3 7 5 15
Roseville, CA AM 2 6 5 13
PM 2 3 2 7
Stockton, CA AM - 6 9 15
PM - 7 6 13
Turlock, CA AM 7 3 2 12
PM 7 4 5 16
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

VAN

PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD

DUTCH BROS COFFEE
1,002 SQ. FT. “ “ ” “ ” ” Dial 811 Callbefore you dig. Know what'sbelow. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1"=10' ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

5,000 SF
S-460' 83'-4" BUS STOP MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SIGN MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SIGN STOP BUS STOP MONUMENT SIGN MULTI-TENANT EXISTING POWER POLE STOP EXISTING POWER POLE TO BE RELOCATED

STOP STOP EXISTING POWER POLE RETAINING WALLS RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL STOP

STOP STOP STOP STOP
BUILDING LIMIT LINE 36" HIGH SCREEN WALL BERM OVERHEAD STRUCTURE 10' CLEAR

STOP STOP
(180' MIN. STACK LENGTH)
246' STACK LENGTH 36" HIGH SCREEN WALL BERM 60'
90'-0" 36" HIGH SCREEN WALL BERMP-1 4,268 SF 60 SEATS 96' 44'-5" (180' MIN. STACK LENGTH) 166' STACK LENGTH 60' 150' MONUMENT SIGN MULTI-TENANT 9,000 SF S-2 RETAINING WALL 5,476 SF S-1B 75 SEATS 40' 80' 3,101 SF GGAS PUMP CANOPY CARWASH 36" HIGH SCREEN WALL BERM 50' 5,945 SF S-3120'
10' 10' (180' MIN.) 253' STACK LENGTH 950 SF S1-A SCREEN WALL SITE NORTH ANATOLIA RETAIL CENTER ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE, LLC. SUNRISE BOULEVARD AND DOUGLAS ROAD 2237 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 160 Rosev宬lle, CA 95661 916.786.8178 1715 R Street., Ste. 200 Sa宦ra宰e宱to, CA 95811 宺害孰ar宦宫宬te宦ts.宦o宰 08/19/2021 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
SHT. A1 0 20' 40' 80' SCALE: 1"=40'-0" N
ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Transportation Engineers

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS AND

SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR WESTBOUND LEFT TURNS AT

ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE ACCESS INTERSECTION

ON DOUGLAS ROAD
Rancho Cordova, CA
Prepared for:

D.L.N. Rancho Cordova, LLC
6698 Mack Road
Sacramento, CA 95821
Prepared by:

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.
3853 Taylor Road, Suite G
Loomis, CA 95650
(916) 660-1555
November 30, 2021
4537-001
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS AND

SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR WESTBOUND LEFT TURNS AT

ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE ACCESS INTERSECTION ON DOUGLAS ROAD Rancho Cordova, CA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Criteria .................................................................. 1 Current Traffic Conditions............................................................................................................... 2 Anatolia Marketplace Traffic........................................................................................................... 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS REVIEW......................................................................................... 10 Summary Conclusions................................................................................................................... 10 Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume: (NOT SATISFIED).................................................. 10 Warrant 2: Four Hour Volumes: (NOT SATISFIED) .................................................................. 11 Warrant 3: Peak Hour Volume / Delay: (NOT SATISFIED)........................................................ 11 FEASIBILITY OF UNCONTROLLED LEFT TURNS ....................................................................... 12 Background Information................................................................................................................ 12 Evaluation Criteria......................................................................................................................... 12 Assessment..................................................................................................................................... 14 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX................................................................................................................................................ 15 ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 1 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21)

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS AND

SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR WESTBOUND LEFT TURNS AT

ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE ACCESS INTERSECTION ON DOUGLAS ROAD Rancho Cordova, CA

INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes an investigation of the need for traffic signal control at the Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road in Rancho Cordova. This existing intersection is intended to allow westbound left turns into the approved shopping center. This analysis is intended to determine whether the combination of current automobile traffic at the intersection when combined with the vehicular contribution from Phase 1 development in Anatolia Marketplace, results in conditions for westbound left turns that satisfy the requirements of guidelines contained in Chapter 4C of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). This report also addresses the factors that influence the feasibility of uncontrolled left turns across arterial streets without a traffic signal.

BACKGROUND
Summary of MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Criteria
Traffic volume data was evaluated using the signal warrant guidelines set forth in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

Nine (9) warrants for traffic signals are cited in Section 4-C of the California MUTCD. The specific thresholds used in these warrants depend upon the characteristics of the subject intersection. Table 1 summarizes the individual warrants and notes which might be applicable to the Anatolia Marketplace access intersection on Douglas Road. As indicated Warrants 1 through 3 deal with vehicular traffic volumes and should be assessed as part of the analysis. These are the warrants most commonly used to determine the need for signalization. Other warrants consider specialized conditions or ancillary factors and are not applicable. For example, there is no pedestrian activity across Douglas Road at this location, so Warrant 4 (Minimum Pedestrian Volume) and Warrant 5 (School Crossing) are not applicable. Similarly, an extra traffic signal isn’t needed to coordinate the flow of traffic along Douglas Road, and the access is not a part of the major roadway network, so Warrants 6 and 8 do not apply. Warrant 7 addresses the need for a traffic signal based on actual traffic crash experience, and this location has no crash history.

There is no railroad crossing at the access and Warrant 9 is not applicable.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 2 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) TABLE 1

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Warrant Description Applicable?
1A Minimum Vehicular Volumes (8-hr Warrant) Yes
1B Interruption of Continuous Traffic (8-hr Warrant) Yes 1C Combination (8-hr Warrant) Yes
2 Four Hour Warrant Yes
3A Peak Hour Delay Warrant Yes
3B Peak Hour Volume Warrant Yes
4 Minimum Pedestrian Volume No
5 School Crossing No
6 Coordinated System No
7 Crash Experience No
8 Roadway Network No
9 Intersection Near A Railroad Grade Crossing No
Current Traffic Conditions
Traffic data for Douglas Road was assembled to provide a basis for this assessment. Because left turns onto Douglas Road are not allowed at the intersection, westbound through traffic is not included in the warrants analysis.

Traffic Volume Data Collection. New hourly traffic counts were conducted on Douglas Road on Tuesday August 17, 2021 (refer to appendix). Over a 24-hour period eastbound Douglas Road carried 7,639 vehicles, and the highest hourly volume occurred between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. (i.e., 755 vehicles per hour).

Anatolia Marketplace Traffic
The additional traffic at the intersection associated with uses in the approved Anatolia Marketplace has been identified through a trip generation, distribution and assignment analysis that supplements the site’s 2016 traffic impact analysis. Because MUTCD makes use of traffic volumes occurring over the 8 highest volume hours of the day, traffic volume projections have been made for the project for the period from 5:00 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Project Characteristics. Anatolia Marketplace is a retail center located east of Sunrise Blvd and south of Douglas Road, as noted in Figure 1 (site plan). Development of the center is proceeding in phases, with a Chevron gas station being the initial occupant. A Dutch Brothers Coffee and surrounding convenience commercial uses are the balance of Phase 1. Anatolia Marketplace Phase 2 would involve development of a major anchor tenant. City of Rancho Cordova staff has asked that this warrant analysis consider conditions with the Chevron Station and with the balance of Phase 1 developed.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

SITE PLAN
4537-001 LT 11/30/2021
KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Engineers Figure 1
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 4 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) Trip Generation Forecasts. With one exception trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition that are
commonly accepted by the City of Rancho Cordova have been used. Trip generations rates that are specific to Dutch Brothers Coffee Kiosk have been used, as noted in the trip generation analysis complete for that use.
1 (attached). Phase 1 of Anatolia Marketplace including the Chevron station is expected to generate 9,092 trip ends over a 24-hour period (i.e., 4,546 into the site and 4,546 out). These trips would occur throughout the day, and the volume of traffic during the peak a.m. and p.m. commute hours are noted in Table 2. The pass-by rates associated with these uses were identified from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook2.

The volume of traffic generated by the Chevron station and the rest of Phase 1 of Anatolia Marketplace has also been estimated on an hourly basis using the time of day distribution identified for each use by ITE. This information is identified in Table 3. 1 Traffic Operational Analysis for CA 3004 Dutch Brothers Restaurant on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, KDA, 11/29/2021 2 Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2014 ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 5 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) TABLE 2
ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE TRIP GENERATION GAS STATION AND BALANCE OF PHASE 1 Land Use
ITE
Code Quantity
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Dentist Office 720 ksf 50% 50% 36.0 79% 21% 3.10 30% 70% 3.93

3.0 54 54 108 7 2 9 4 8 12
Fast Casual Restaurant 930 ksf 50% 50% 97.14 50% 50% 1.43 55% 45% 12.55

2.42 117 118 235 1 2 3 16 14 30
Pass-by 43% daily / pm 50 50 100 0 0 0 6 6 12
Net Primary 67 68 135 1 2 3 10 8 18
Strip Retail Space 822 ksf 50% 50% 54.45 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59

18.95 516 516 1,032 27 18 45 62 63 125
Pass-by 15% 77 77 154 3 3 6 9 9 18
Net Primary 439 439 878 24 15 39 53 54 107
Gasoline sales w/ Cstore
945 Position 50% 50% 265.12 50% 50% 16.06 50% 50% 18.42 12 Positions 1,591 1,590 3,181 97 97 194 111 110 221
Pass-by
50% daily,
62% am
56% pm
795 795 1,590 60 60 120 62 62 124
Net Primary 796 795 1,591 37 37 74 49 48 97
Dutch Brothers Coffee ksf 50% 50% 1,685.12 51% 49% 148.07 48% 52% 121.55

0.95 800 800 1,600 72 69 141 55 60 115
Pass-by 75%
daily and pm
600 600 1,200 53 53 106 43 43 86
Net Primary 200 200 400 19 16 35 12 17 29
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive-Thru
934 ksf 50% 50% 467.48 51% 49% 44.61 52% 48% 33.03

6.28 1,468 1,468 2,936 143 137 280 107 100 207
Pass-by 50% 734 734 1,468 70 70 140 52 52 104
Net Primary 734 734 1,468 73 67 140 55 48 103
Total Gross Trips 4,546 4,546 9,092 347 325 672 355 355 710 Pass-by 2,256 2,256 4,512 186 186 372 172 172 344
Net Primary 2,290 2,290 4,580 161 139 300 183 183 366
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 6 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) TABLE 3

HOURLY DISTRIBUTION OF

TRIPS ENTERING AND EXITING ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE
Time
Chevron
Balance of Phase 1
Total Phase 1
Fast Food Restaurants Retail Other1 Dutch Brothers
% of 24-Hour
Traffic
Trips % of 24-
Hour Traffic
Trips % of 24-
Hour Traffic
Trips Trips % of 24-Hour
Traffic
Trips Trips
In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out
Enter Exit 1,591 1,590 Enter Exit 1,468 1,468 Enter Exit 516 516 171 172 Enter Exit 800 800 4,545 4,546 4-5 a.m. 1.0 1.116 17 0.4 0.3 6 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1.9 1.5 15 12 37 34 5-6 a.m. 2.3 2.2 37 36 0.8 0.7 12 10 0.1 0.1 1 1 0 0 8.2 6.8 66 54 115 101 6-7 a.m. 4.7 4.575 72 2.3 1.9 34 28 0.3 0.2 2 1 1 0 10.0 8.9 80 71 192 173 7-8 a.m. 6.2 6.198 98 3.2 2.9 47 43 1.4 0.9 7 5 6 1 10.3 9.8 82 79 240 224 8-9 a.m. 5.8 5.992 94 3.4 3.3 50 48 2.6 1.5 13 8 8 3 10.0 10.1 80 81 243 234 9-10 a.m. 5.0 5.180 81 3.3 3.2 48 47 4.7 2.5 24 13 7 6 7.7 8.5 61 68 221 214 10-11 a.m. 5.2 5.282 82 4.0 3.7 59 54 7.1 4.1 37 21 7 6 7.2 7.6 57 61 241 225 11-12 p.m. 5.3 5.285 83 9.1 7.6 134 112 9.7 6.8 50 35 21 16 6.7 7.2 53 58 342 303 12-1 p.m. 5.8 5.892 92 11.7 11.8 172 173 10.6 9.4 55 49 19 23 5.4 6.1 43 49 380 384 1-2 p.m. 5.4 5.386 85 7.8 8.7 115 128 8.2 9.5 47 49 15 16 6.3 5.7 50 45 314 323 2-3 p.m. 6.1 5.8 96 93 5.8 6.4 85 94 8.9 9.2 46 47 13 13 5.2 5.6 41 45 281 292 3-4 p.m. 6.5 6.4 103 102 5.6 5.6 82 82 8.5 9.0 44 46 11 12 5.7 5.3 46 42 286 285 4-5 p.m. 7.2 7.1115 112 5.7 5.4 84 79 8.9 9.4 46 49 13 14 4.6 4.2 37 33 294 287 5-6 p.m. 7.2 7.1 115 112 6.8 6.4 100 94 9.2 9.4 47 49 15 16 2.7 3.4 21 27 295 296 6-7 p.m. 6.5 6.6103 104 7.3 7.2 107 106 7.6 8.5 39 44 14 16 2.7 3.0 21 34 284 295 7-8 p.m. 5.3 5.3 84 84 6.4 6.7 94 98 5.3 6.9 27 36 10 13 2.1 2.1 17 17 232 248 8-9 p.m. 4.3 4.5 68 71 5.8 6.0 85 88 3.2 5.6 17 29 6 7 1.2 1.9 10 15 186 210 9-10 p.m. 3.7 3.7 59 59 4.3 4.8 63 70 1.6 4.3 8 22 4 4 1.2 1.2 9 9 144 166 10-11 p.m. 2.7 2.843 44 2.7 3.2 40 47 0.7 1.5 4 8 1 2 0.4 0.6 3 5 90 106 11-12 a.m. 1.8 1.9 29 30 1.6 2.0 23 29 0.2 0.7 2 4 0 0 0.0 0.1 0 0 54 64 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition
1 Dentist office and fast casual restaurant
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 7 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) Trip Distribution. The regional distribution of trips to and from Anatolia Marketplace will likely reflect the trip origins / destinations within the trade area of individual businesses, as well as the share of trips drawn from the flow of traffic already passing the site on Sunrise Blvd and Douglas Road. Typically, primary trips drawn to convenience retail / service uses originate within 1 to 2 miles of the site. The trip distribution assumptions originally made in 2016 TIS were reviewed and updated to reflect development since 2016 in the southern Rancho Cordova area, and the assumptions made for this analysis are shown in Table 4. As shown, the Chevron station and buildings S-1A and S-1B will draw more pass-by traffic from Douglas Road than will other buildings along Sunrise Blvd.

TABLE 4
ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE PHASE 1 PRIMARY TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Directionality
Percent of Total
Primary Trips
Pass By Trips
Chevron
Dutch Brothers
and S-1B
S-2, P-1, S-3, S-4
To/From the north on Sunrise Blvd 15%
To/From the east on Douglas Blvd 35%
To/From the west on Douglas Blvd 5%
To/From the east on Herodian Dr 10%
To/From the east on Chrysanthy Blvd 15%
To/From the south on Sunrise Blvd 20%
Total 100%
Northbound Sunrise Blvd 25% 40%
Westbound Douglas Road 35% 10%
Eastbound Douglas Blvd 40% 25%
Southbound Sunrise Blvd 0% 25%
Total 100% 100%
Trip Assignment. The trips generated by businesses in Anatolia Marketplace would use the internal circulation system and project driveways along the “least time path” between the site and the destination noted under Trip Distribution. The choice of routes will vary based on the location of each business within the center, particularly with regards to exiting traffic headed north. Motorists leaving the far northeast corner of the site, such as the Chevron station, may turn right on Douglas Road and make U-turns at Cades Cove Drive. Alternatively, traffic headed south on Sunrise Blvd will likely travel through the site and turn left at the Herodian Drive traffic signal.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 8 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) Table 5 summarizes the derivation of total hourly traffic volumes at the Douglas Road / Anatolia Marketplace East driveway based on the sum of Chevron station traffic and trips from the balance of the Anatolia Marketplace Phase 1 site. In each case the table identifies the assignment of trips for each of the three movements that are input to Warrants 1, 2 and 3:

Major Street Volumes (columns H and I)
• Eastbound Douglas Road through traffic
• Eastbound Douglas Road right turns
Minor Approach Volume (columns J and K)
• Westbound left turn
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 9 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) TABLE 5

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT HOURLY TRAFFIC ESTIMATES

AT DOUGLAS ROAD / ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE ACCESS INTERSECTION Hour
Vehicles per hour (vph)
Eastbound Douglas Road Westbound Douglas Road
Eastbound T Left Turns hrough Traffic Eastbound Right Turns Total All Eastbound Traffic

A B C D E F G H I J K L
Existing Chevron
Balance of
Phase 1
Total
New Chevron
Balance of
Phase 1
Total
New
Existing Plus
Chevron alone
Existing Plus
Chevron and
Balance of
Phase 1
Chevron
Balance of
Phase 1
alone
Total New
A B C B+C E F E+F A+B+E A+D+G J K J+K
5:00 a.m. 118 2 6 8 4 0 4 125 131 13 22 35
6:00 a.m. 322 5 8 13 9 0 9 335 344 26 35 61
7:00 a.m. 367 12 12 24 11 0 11 390 402 34 43 77
8:00 a.m. 457 12 15 27 10 1 11 479 494 32 46 78
9:00 a.m. 317 10 16 26 9 0 9 336 352 28 44 72
10:00 a.m. 333 10 18 28 9 1 10 352 370 29 52 81
11:00 a.m. 404 10 26 36 9 1 10 423 450 30 88 118
12:00 a.m. 446 11 45 56 10 1 11 468 508 32 102 134
1:00 p.m. 409 10 39 49 9 1 10 429 464 30 78 108
2:00 p.m. 490 11 33 44 11 0 11 511 542 34 62 96
3:00 p.m. 569 13 32 42 11 1 12 593 621 36 62 98
4:00 p.m. 688 10 31 41 13 1 14 712 739 40 61 101
5:00 p.m. 755 11 32 43 13 1 14 778 807 39 64 103
6:00 p.m. 629 13 33 46 11 1 12 654 682 36 65 101
7:00 p.m. 450 11 27 38 9 1 10 470 494 29 54 83
8:00 p.m. 329 9 22 31 8 0 8 346 365 24 43 67
9:00 p.m. 209 7 17 24 6 1 7 223 239 21 31 52
10:00 p.m. 136 6 8 14 5 0 5 147 155 15 18 33
24 hr total 7,639 199 590 175 12 187 8,013 8,416 557 1,001 1,558 Volumes for Warrant 3 only Additional Volumes for Warrant 2 Additional volumes for Warrant 1 ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 10 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21)

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS REVIEW
Summary Conclusions
The traffic signal warrants analysis reached the conclusions noted below and noted in Table 6.

1. No traffic warrant relating to traffic volume is satisfied with operation of the Chevron station alone.

2. No traffic volume warrant is satisfied with full occupancy of Anatolia Marketplace Phase 1.

TABLE 6

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS SUMMARY
Warrant Description of Warrant
Warrant Satisfied?
Chevron
Station Alone
Buildout of
Phase 1
1A Minimum Vehicular Volumes (8-hr Warrant) No 80%
1B Interruption of Continuous Traffic (8-hr Warrant) No No 1C Combination (8-hr Warrant) No No
2 Four Hour Warrant No No
3A Peak Hour Delay Warrant No No
3B Peak Hour Volume Warrant No No
An explanation of the issues associated with each warrant follows.

Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume: (NOT SATISFIED) There are three parts to Warrant 1.

Warrant 1A: Minimum Vehicular Volume: (80% SATISFIED). The minimum vehicular volume is intended for applications where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. For each of any eight (8) hours on an “average” day (defined as a weekday representing traffic volumes normally and repeatedly found at the location), a total minimum volume of 420 vehicles per hour must be present on the two major street approaches. In the case of a signal controlling inbound left turns, only the affected major volume is included (i.e., only eastbound traffic). A minimum of 105 vehicles per hour in a single lane must be present on the higher of the minor street approaches (i.e., westbound left turn lane).

As shown on the attached worksheets (Figure 4C-101), the volumes forecast for the highest volume eight hours at the Douglas Road / Anatolia Marketplace East driveway do not reach the levels that fully satisfy this requirement for eight hours of the day with the Chevron station alone or with occupancy of Phase 1. Therefore, this warrant is not satisfied.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 11 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) Warrant 1B: Interruption of Continuous Traffic: (NOT SATISFIED). This warrant addresses the condition when the volume of traffic on the major street is so large as to require a traffic signal to accommodate minor street access. For each of any eight (8) hours on an average day, a minimum volume of 630 vehicles per hour must be present on eastbound Douglas Road, and a minimum of 53 vehicles per hour must be present in the left turn lane. This warrant is not satisfied with the Chevron station alone or with full occupancy of Phase 1.

Warrant 1C: Combination of Warrants: (NOT SATISFIED). Traffic signals may be warranted where conditions 1A and 1B are not 100% satisfied, but where both Warrants 1A and 1B are satisfied to the extent of 80% or more of the stated values. Condition A is satisfied to the 80% level, but Condition B is not satisfied to the 80% level. Thus, this combination of warrants is not met for all of the eight hours.

Warrant 2: Four Hour Volumes: (NOT SATISFIED)
Conditions for this warrant are intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. This Warrant is satisfied when, for each of any four hours or more of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles per hour in the left turn lane all fall above the curve as presented in Figure 4C-1. As shown in the attachments to this report, this warrant is not met for the four highest volume hours of the day.

Warrant 3: Peak Hour Volume / Delay: (NOT SATISFIED)
Warrant 3A: Peak Hour Delay: (NOT SATISFIED). The peak hour delay warrant suggests that the length of side street delay is sufficient to justify a traffic signal. Warrants are satisfied by a combination of total approach delay and minimum entering volumes. Total side street approach delay must exceed 4 vehicle-hours (one-lane approach), while the side street approach volume must exceed 100 vehicles per hour (vph) and the total entering volume must exceed 800 vph. SimTraffic simulation was used to identify delay length in the westbound left turn lane during the highest volume hour. In this case, with Phase 1 occupancy the total peak hour delay for westbound left turns is 0.2 vehicle hours, and the 95th percentile queue in the left turn lane is 65 feet. As total delay is well below the 4 vehicle hour threshold, this warrant is not satisfied.

Warrant 3B: Peak Hour Volume: (NOT SATISFIED). The peak hour volume signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of one hour of an average day, the minor street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. Warrants are satisfied when the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles per hour in the left turn lane falls above the curve presented in Figure 4C-3. As shown in the attachments to this report, the highest hourly volumes do not reach the levels that satisfy this warrant.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 12 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21)

FEASIBILITY OF UNCONTROLLED LEFT TURNS
This assessment of the feasibility of uncontrolled left turn access from Douglas Road into Anatolia Marketplace without a traffic signal is based on the speed of eastbound traffic on Douglas Road and the sight distance needed by westbound motorists to identify appropriate gaps in that traffic and safely complete left turns.

Background Information
Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds. A 24-hour count was made on Douglas Road in the area of the project access on August 17, 2021. That count indicated a total daily traffic volume on Douglas Road of 14,833 vehicles per day. More importantly the count was conducted in a manner that captured the speed of traffic as it passed. The speed limit is 55 mph. As indicated in Table 7, average speed of eastbound traffic over 24 hours was 50 mph, while the 85th percentile speed, which is commonly used to establish speed limits, was 56 mph. 5% of the eastbound traffic traveled at 60 mph or higher (i.e., 95% speed). The speeds were slightly higher in the westbound direction.

TABLE 7

CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SPEED INFORMATION

ON DOUGLAS ROAD EAST OF SUNRISE BLVD
Location Direction Daily
Volume
Speed (mph)
Average 85
th % 95th %
Douglas Road 800 feet
east of Sunrise Blvd
Eastbound 7,639 50 56 60
Westbound 7,194 52 58 62
Both 14,833 -
Sight Distance. A site visit was conducted to identify the sight distance available for motorists who would be waiting to turn left into the Anatolia Marketplace from westbound Douglas Road.

The horizontal alignment of Douglas Road in this area is straight, and there is a slight hump in the vertical alignment just east of the Sunrise Blvd intersection. However, as noted in the attached photograph taken from the left turn lane, the view is clear to the Sunrise Blvd intersection 800 feet away. While trees are in the median, their foliage is above the driver’s line of sight and do not interfere with sight distance.

Evaluation Criteria
Left turns across three lanes of travel create design requirements to ensure safety. In addition to the need for adequate sight distance from the left turn lane itself, the driveway’s receiving area needs to provide deceleration space for turning vehicles.

Sight Distance The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) publication Policy on the Design of Highways and Streets Table 9-17 outlines the distance at which an eastbound vehicle would need to be seen by a motorist waiting to turn left ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 13 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) into the project in order to have room to turn. These values are based on the time needed for a motorist to identify a gap in oncoming traffic and drive across Douglas Road. For automobiles across three lanes of traffic this time is assumed to be 6.5 seconds. A 60 mph design speed would match the 95th percentile speed on eastbound Douglas Road, and for a 60 mph design across three lanes of eastbound traffic that distance is 580 feet, as shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8

SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR LEFT TURNS ACROSS TRAFFIC Design Speed
(mph)
Stopping Sight
Distance (feet)
Intersection Sight Distance (feet)
Across 1 lane Across 2 lanes Across 3 lanes
35 250 285 310 335
40 305 325 355 385
45 360 365 400 430
50 425 405 440 480
55 495 445 485 525
60 570 490 535 580
65 645 530 580 625
Left turning vehicles will also need to be aware of traffic entering from the other Anatolia Marketplace driveway located about 240 feet to the west. Those vehicles will be visible from the westbound left turn lane. In this case, right turning traffic at the driveway will accelerate after making the turn and based on AASHTO Figure 2-33 could reach a speed of 30 to 32 mph and take 7 seconds to reach the next intersection. Because this travel time exceeds the time needed to complete the left turn, the distance between the two driveways and the available sight distance is adequate.

Deceleration. To make left turns into Anatolia Marketplace motorists will accelerate from a stop across three travel lanes and then move into the driveway. It is important that the driveway design allow that entry at the probable turning speed and provide subsequent deceleration space.

In this way entering vehicles will not need to slow down on Douglas Road itself when making the turn. Assuming that a driver reaches a speed of 25 mph when completing the turn, AASHTO Figure 2-34 suggests that another 120 feet is needed to come to a comfortable stop.

Left Turn Queue Storage. The existing left turn lane is 240 feet long. The lane would need to provide the space needed to accommodate the peak queues waiting to turn left. Two methods are available to identify peak queue length and left turn lane storage. First, the queue length is identified as a byproduct of operating Level of Service analysis and simulation. Secondly, the turn lane storage recommended in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) has been identified. The HDM suggests that un-signalized left turn lanes provide storage equivalent to a two-minute accumulation of peak hour vehicles, with a waiting vehicle assumed to occupy 25 feet.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 14 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21) Assessment
Sight Distance. The view looking westward from the existing left turn lane is clear through the Sunrise Blvd intersection, which is 800 feet away. As the sight distance exceeds the 580 foot AASHTO requirement, the view is adequate for left turns.

Driveway Deceleration. Under the current plan the driveway throat depth is 200 feet. This exceeds the comfortable deceleration distance from 25 mph. Entering traffic will not need to slow on Douglas Road when completing the turn, and the design is adequate to allow left turns without a signal.
95th Percentile Left Turn Queues / Storage. Under Existing Plus Phase 1 conditions the highest volume traffic hour would carry 103 westbound left turns. SimTraffic simulation of the intersection operation indicated an average delay for left turns of 7 seconds per vehicle at that time. The 95th percentile queue was estimated to be 65 feet long. The 240 feet lane can accommodate this queue.

Under HDM methods the storage requirement is based on left turn volume regardless of the amount of opposing eastbound traffic. With full occupancy of Phase 1 the highest volume hour had 97 westbound left turns, and the highest number of left turns in any one hour was 124 at noon. The 2 minute accumulation of these volumes is 4 and 5 vehicles, respectively, with corresponding storage lengths of 100 and 125 feet. These lengths can be accommodated in the existing 240 foot left turn lane.

Conclusion
Based on these criteria, left turns into the Anatolia Marketplace East driveway are feasible without a traffic signal.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment Page 15 Anatolia Marketplace Access on Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova, CA (11/30/21)

APPENDIX
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rancho Cordova
Date: Project #: CA21_070129_001

NB SB EB WB
0 0 7,639 7,194
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 6 7 13 0 0 124 112 236
00:15 0 0 8 6 14 0 0 109 102 211
00:30 0 0 14 6 20 0 0 101 112 213
00:45 0 0 17 45 6 25 23 70 0 0 112 446 99 425 211 871
01:00 0 0 8 3 11 0 0 106 90 196
01:15 0 0 7 3 10 0 0 96 106 202
01:30 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 106 105 211
01:45 0 0 4 19 5 13 9 32 0 0 101 409 123 424 224 833
02:00 0 0 5 3 8 0 0 124 124 248
02:15 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 86 133 219
02:30 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 119 133 252
02:45 0 0 0 8 7 17 7 25 0 0 161 490 122 512 283 1002
03:00 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 119 122 241
03:15 0 0 2 5 7 0 0 137 119 256
03:30 0 0 11 2 13 0 0 155 114 269
03:45 0 0 3 21 10 18 13 39 0 0 158 569 129 484 287 1053 04:00 0 0 10 4 14 0 0 158 145 303
04:15 0 0 7 14 21 0 0 166 131 297
04:30 0 0 5 14 19 0 0 192 155 347
04:45 0 0 10 32 13 45 23 77 0 0 172 688 126 557 298 1245 05:00 0 0 20 30 50 0 0 206 138 344
05:15 0 0 21 46 67 0 0 210 139 349
05:30 0 0 28 51 79 0 0 185 115 300
05:45 0 0 49 118 71 198 120 316 0 0 154 755 113 505 267 1260 06:00 0 0 60 74 134 0 0 194 128 322
06:15 0 0 75 89 164 0 0 165 77 242
06:30 0 0 87 108 195 0 0 138 110 248
06:45 0 0 100 322 135 406 235 728 0 0 132 629 84 399 216 1028 07:00 0 0 114 141 255 0 0 129 69 198
07:15 0 0 69 184 253 0 0 113 66 179
07:30 0 0 80 182 262 0 0 101 65 166
07:45 0 0 104 367 225 732 329 1099 0 0 107 450 54 254 161 704 08:00 0 0 100 177 277 0 0 98 57 155
08:15 0 0 147 128 275 0 0 79 37 116
08:30 0 0 123 126 249 0 0 93 40 133
08:45 0 0 87 457 122 553 209 1010 0 0 59 329 54 188 113 517 09:00 0 0 72 125 197 0 0 71 40 111
09:15 0 0 89 103 192 0 0 49 32 81
09:30 0 0 84 105 189 0 0 55 21 76
09:45 0 0 72 317 86 419 158 736 0 0 34 209 26 119 60 328 10:00 0 0 102 83 185 0 0 40 31 71
10:15 0 0 75 102 177 0 0 35 16 51
10:30 0 0 82 91 173 0 0 36 10 46
10:45 0 0 74 333 119 395 193 728 0 0 25 136 10 67 35 203 11:00 0 0 94 111 205 0 0 23 7 30
11:15 0 0 103 107 210 0 0 26 13 39
11:30 0 0 99 112 211 0 0 12 4 16
11:45 0 0 106 402 82 412 188 814 0 0 27 88 3 27 30 115
TOTALS 2441 3233 5674 5198 3961 9159
SPLIT % 43.0% 57.0% 38.3% 56.8% 43.2% 61.7%

NB SB EB WB
0 0 7,639 7,194
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 16:30 15:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 474 768 1143 780 560 1338
Pk Hr Factor 0.806 0.853 0.869 0.929 0.903 0.958
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 824 1285 2109 0 0 1443 1062 2505
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 474 768 1143 0 0 780 558 1338
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.806 0.853 0.869 0.000 0.000 0.929 0.900 0.958 Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total
14,833
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Douglas Rd E/O Sunrise Blvd
Tuesday
8/17/2021
DAILY TOTALS Total
14,833
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Day: City: Rancho Cordova
Date: Project #: CA21_070129_001
Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total 00:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 4 0 1 0 13
00:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 2 5 1 0 0 0 14
00:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 2 6 3 1 0 20
00:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 6 6 2 3 1 0 23
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 1 0 0 0 11
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 10
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 9
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 8
02:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 5
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 5
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 7
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 6
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 7
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 3 0 0 0 13
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 1 1 1 13
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 3 5 0 1 0 14
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 5 5 2 0 1 21
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 6 8 1 0 0 19
04:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 7 9 3 0 0 23
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 13 20 7 3 0 0 50
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 23 17 5 1 0 67
05:30 0 1 0 0 2 1 4 14 32 16 8 0 1 79
05:45 0 0 0 0 1 4 12 30 33 27 11 2 0 120
06:00 0 0 0 0 3 4 14 36 44 26 7 0 0 134
06:15 0 0 0 2 4 8 21 40 55 26 6 2 0 164
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 46 64 48 10 0 0 195
06:45 0 0 0 1 2 8 32 59 77 46 8 2 0 235
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 25 69 89 50 7 2 0 255
07:15 0 0 0 0 5 8 20 57 92 49 18 4 0 253
07:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 20 60 76 79 23 0 0 262
07:45 0 0 1 0 0 7 27 105 117 65 7 0 0 329
08:00 1 0 0 0 2 11 15 75 95 65 12 1 0 277
08:15 0 0 0 1 5 12 36 91 79 38 12 0 1 275
08:30 0 0 0 0 3 9 27 64 88 43 11 2 2 249
08:45 0 0 0 0 1 6 22 62 63 44 10 1 0 209
09:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 14 59 73 38 10 1 0 197
09:15 0 0 0 0 2 5 20 64 58 36 6 1 0 192
09:30 0 0 0 2 2 10 24 50 61 32 7 1 0 189
09:45 0 0 0 0 3 6 11 35 64 32 7 0 0 158
10:00 0 0 0 0 5 9 24 49 50 39 8 1 0 185
10:15 0 0 0 0 0 3 17 56 60 29 12 0 0 177
10:30 0 0 0 1 0 7 22 39 62 30 10 2 0 173
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 57 65 42 12 3 0 193
11:00 0 0 0 1 3 10 23 43 69 44 11 1 0 205
11:15 1 0 0 0 1 8 30 60 67 35 7 1 0 210
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 6 25 49 84 35 12 0 0 211
11:45 0 1 0 1 1 3 25 52 61 35 7 2 0 188
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 38 68 77 33 11 2 0 236
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 9 25 66 68 34 7 2 0 211
12:30 0 1 0 0 5 2 21 55 81 39 8 1 0 213
12:45 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 53 65 45 15 3 1 211
13:00 1 0 0 0 2 5 28 42 71 41 6 0 0 196
13:15 0 0 0 2 1 1 17 60 63 44 11 3 0 202
13:30 1 1 0 0 0 6 25 60 59 41 17 1 0 211
13:45 0 0 0 0 1 4 21 59 89 47 3 0 0 224
14:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 82 87 50 11 2 0 248
14:15 0 0 0 1 0 6 10 54 74 56 17 1 0 219
14:30 0 0 0 0 2 5 30 70 85 44 16 0 0 252
14:45 0 0 0 0 0 7 33 75 95 58 13 2 0 283
15:00 1 0 0 1 1 3 29 73 78 43 12 0 0 241
15:15 0 0 0 0 0 5 30 76 82 52 11 0 0 256
15:30 1 0 0 0 1 2 22 78 94 47 22 2 0 269
15:45 0 0 0 0 0 6 39 71 117 40 12 2 0 287
16:00 0 0 0 0 2 6 25 85 113 58 12 2 0 303
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 8 25 85 103 57 14 5 0 297
16:30 0 0 0 0 1 10 36 109 116 55 17 3 0 347
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 14 30 79 97 65 12 1 0 298
17:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 36 85 124 72 21 1 0 344
17:15 0 0 0 0 1 3 29 101 136 59 19 1 0 349
17:30 1 0 0 0 0 2 24 98 97 55 16 6 1 300
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 86 95 51 15 3 0 267
18:00 0 1 0 0 0 3 32 87 115 68 14 1 1 322
18:15 0 0 0 0 0 3 14 68 90 53 14 0 0 242
18:30 0 0 0 0 0 9 33 73 88 38 5 1 1 248
18:45 0 0 0 0 0 7 22 49 74 50 12 2 0 216
19:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 19 52 71 41 12 1 0 198
19:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 57 68 18 9 2 0 179
19:30 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 38 52 34 10 1 0 166
19:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 50 54 33 11 1 0 161
20:00 0 0 0 0 0 4 20 53 46 29 2 0 1 155
20:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 11 33 37 26 5 1 0 116
20:30 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 41 49 21 1 0 0 133
20:45 0 0 0 0 1 4 17 31 28 21 10 1 0 113
21:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 41 31 27 5 0 0 111
21:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 33 14 3 0 0 81
21:30 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 27 18 11 3 0 0 76
21:45 0 0 0 1 1 5 11 16 16 9 1 0 0 60
22:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 23 26 8 1 0 0 71
22:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 13 23 3 4 0 0 51
22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 16 16 7 1 0 0 46
22:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 6 15 1 2 0 0 35
23:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 12 3 3 0 0 30
23:15 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 9 17 7 0 0 0 39
23:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 3 2 2 0 0 16
23:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 11 2 2 0 0 30
9 5 1 16 71 368 1533 4104 5046 2843 736 89 12 14833
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 10% 28% 34% 19% 5% 1% 0% 100%
3 2 1 10 49 176 582 1505 1887 1131 286 35 7 5674
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 10% 13% 8% 2% 0% 0% 38%
01:30 11:45 07:00 06:00 09:15 07:45 11:15 07:45 07:15 07:15 07:15 06:30 07:45 07:30 1 2 1 3 12 39 118 335 380 258 60 8 3 1143
6 3 0 6 22 192 951 2599 3159 1712 450 54 5 9159
0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 6% 18% 21% 12% 3% 0% 0% 62%
12:45 12:00 12:30 12:30 16:00 16:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 17:00 15:45 17:15 16:30 2 1 2 8 38 131 374 473 251 71 12 2 1338
AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
2109 14% 1704 11% 2505 17% 8515 57%
Douglas Rd Summary 45 51 51 58 61 14833
Totals
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
% of Totals
Tuesday
AM Volumes
% AM
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Douglas Rd E/O Sunrise Blvd
8/17/2021
Summary
Directional Peak Periods
All Classes
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Volume
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Day: City: Rancho Cordova
Date: Project #: CA21_070129_001
Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total 00:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 16 19 13 6 3 0 70
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 13 6 6 1 0 1 32
02:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 5 3 3 0 0 25
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 15 9 3 1 1 39
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 10 21 27 6 1 1 77
05:00 0 1 0 0 3 8 25 73 108 67 27 3 1 316
06:00 0 0 0 3 9 23 91 181 240 146 31 4 0 728
07:00 0 0 1 0 8 29 92 291 374 243 55 6 0 1099
08:00 1 0 0 1 11 38 100 292 325 190 45 4 3 1010
09:00 0 0 0 3 7 22 69 208 256 138 30 3 0 736
10:00 0 0 0 1 5 21 75 201 237 140 42 6 0 728
11:00 1 1 0 2 5 27 103 204 281 149 37 4 0 814
12:00 PM 0 1 0 0 5 23 108 242 291 151 41 8 1 871
13:00 2 1 0 2 4 16 91 221 282 173 37 4 0 833
14:00 0 0 0 1 2 20 87 281 341 208 57 5 0 1002
15:00 2 0 0 1 2 16 120 298 371 182 57 4 0 1053
16:00 0 0 0 0 3 38 116 358 429 235 55 11 0 1245
17:00 1 0 0 0 2 11 104 370 452 237 71 11 1 1260
18:00 0 1 0 0 0 22 101 277 367 209 45 4 2 1028
19:00 0 0 0 0 1 12 76 197 245 126 42 5 0 704
20:00 0 0 0 0 2 15 64 158 160 97 18 2 1 517
21:00 0 0 0 1 1 11 36 108 98 61 12 0 0 328
22:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 35 58 80 19 8 0 0 203
23:00 1 0 0 1 0 5 13 31 43 14 7 0 0 115
9 5 1 16 71 368 1533 4104 5046 2843 736 89 12 14833
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 10% 28% 34% 19% 5% 1% 0% 100%
3 2 1 10 49 176 582 1505 1887 1131 286 35 7 5674
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 10% 13% 8% 2% 0% 0% 38%
02:00 05:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 1 1 1 3 11 38 103 292 374 243 55 6 3 1099
6 3 0 6 22 192 951 2599 3159 1712 450 54 5 9159
0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 6% 18% 21% 12% 3% 0% 0% 62%
13:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 16:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 18:00 17:00 2 1 2 5 38 120 370 452 237 71 11 2 1260
AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
2109 14% 1704 11% 2505 17% 8515 57%
Summary
ADT
14833
Percentiles
Street Name
Douglas Rd
85th
58 95th
61 50th
51 Average
51 15th Direction
45 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Douglas Rd E/O Sunrise Blvd
8/17/2021
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
All Speeds
Tuesday
Volume
PM Volumes
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Project #: CA21_070129_001 City: Rancho Cordova
Location: Date: 8/17/2021
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Douglas Rd E/O Sunrise Blvd
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
00:0001:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 Vehicles

NB SB EB WB
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

SimTraffic Performance Report EX PM PLUS PHASE 1
Baseline 11/30/2021
ANATOLAI CHEVRON SimTraffic Report
KDANDERSON & ASSOCIATES Page 1
3: Anatolia MP E & Douglas Road Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 2.4 0.1 0.1 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s) 0.7 0.2 6.7 0.4 3.0 1.1
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Queuing and Blocking Report EX PM PLUS PHASE 1
Baseline 11/30/2021
ANATOLAI CHEVRON SimTraffic Report
KDANDERSON & ASSOCIATES Page 2
Intersection: 3: Anatolia MP E & Douglas Road
Movement EB EB EB WB NB
Directions Served T T TR L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 3 5 8 84 57
Average Queue (ft) 0 0 0 34 26
95th Queue (ft) 2 3 5 65 52
Link Distance (ft) 1245 1245 1245 202
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

DOUGLAS ROAD

ANATOLIA MARKET PLACE (E)
60 X
X
X
X
479
32 468
32 429
30 511
34 593
36 712
40 778
39 654
36 X
X
X
473
26 462
26 425
26 509
28 589
32 708
33 773
31 647
27 X
X

EXISTING PLUS CHEVRON
11 – 26 - 2021
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

X
593
36 712
40 778
39 654
36 X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
778
39 X

EXISTING PLUS CHEVRON
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

EXISTING PLUS CHEVRON
3:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 593, 36
4:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 712, 40
5:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 778, 39
6:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 654, 36

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

PM ( ) : 778, 39

EXISTING PLUS CHEVRON STATION
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

DOUGLAS ROAD

ANATOLIA MARKET PLACE (E)
60 X
X
X
X
450
118
508
134
464
108
542
96 621
98 739
101
807
103
682
101
X
X
X
X
X

EXISTING PLUS PHASE I
11 – 26 - 2021
450
118
508
134
464
108
542
96 621
98 739
101
807
103
682
101
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

X
621
98 739
101
807
103
682
101
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
807
97 X

EXISTING PLUS PHASE I
X
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

EXISTING PLUS PHASE I
3:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 621, 98
4:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 739, 101
5:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 807, 103
6:00 PM ( ): MAJOR 682, 101

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

5:00 PM ( ) : 807, 103

EXISTING PLUS PHASE I
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 1 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
General Conditions

1. The approved entitlement is for a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review for the construction of a 1,002 SF drive-through coffee kiosk (Dutch Bros. Coffee) located within the Anatolia Marketplace shopping center on the southeast corner of Sunrise Boulevard and Douglas Road. The project is to be completed as described in the City Council Staff Report dated March 22, 2022 with Project Plans Exhibit A and conditions herein, for Project No. PLND-1021-0013.

On-Going Planning

2. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or challenging the validity of any environmental or other documentation submitted by the applicant related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.

On-Going Planning

3. Any future alteration to the buildings, change in use, intensification of the site, or modification to the parking and landscaped area must be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with all local, state, and federal regulations. Minor modifications that are found to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans such as colors, plant materials, or minor lot line adjustments, may be approved administratively. Major modifications shall be approved by the applicable decision making body.

On-Going Planning/
Building
/Public Works

4. Applicant/Developer shall not carry a negative account balance with the City for the processing of the project. If a negative account balance occurs, it will be the developer's responsibility to pay the balance due, in order to avoid delays in the processing of future permits or recordation of maps. Please email the Finance Department at [email protected] for the status of your account with the City.

On-Going Finance

5. Signage is not approved with this permit. All signage shall comply with the City of Rancho Cordova Zoning Code.

On-Going Planning

6. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition, paving and/or grading of any real property must adhere to the development standards outlined within the City’s Noise Element, RCMC 6.68 and RCMC 16.18.1407(F).

On-Going Planning/
Building/Code
Enforcement

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 2 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

7. In the event of the encounter of subsurface materials suspected to be of an archaeological or paleontological nature or if any human remains are found, all grading and/or excavation shall cease, the find shall be left untouched, and the City Planning Department shall be immediately notified. This requirement shall be noted on the Grading and Building Plans, prior to issuance of permits. A qualified professional archaeologist certified by the Register of Professional Archaeologists or paleontologist with a degree(s) in paleontology or geology, to evaluate and make recommendations as to disposition, mitigation and/or salvage. The recommendation shall be implemented before work may proceed.

On-going Planning/
Building

8. Applicant shall be responsible for all damage to City streets associated with construction of the project and shall repair any damage as soon as possible.

On-Going Public Works

9. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

On-Going Public Works

10. Applicant shall comply with all applicable conditions of approval for the Anatolia Marketplace Tentative Map (DD9966)
On-Going Public Works

11. Operator shall provide adequate staffing and operational mitigation measures to avoid excessive traffic queuing at the drive thru that disrupts either on-site circulation in the commercial center or off-site circulation on City roadways.

On-Going Public Works/
Planning

12. This Conditional Use Permit, Minor Design Review, and Exception shall expire 3 years from the date of approval, unless:

A. Substantial construction of the permitted use/design has commenced and is diligently pursued to completion; clear documentation is provided to establish that the permit holder has made a good faith effort to commence work upon the use; the permitted use has clearly been established; actual occupancy of an existing building or land occurs under the terms of the permitted use.

On-Going Planning

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 3 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
B. An extension is filed for and approved in accordance with RCMC 23.110.070 (extension of land use entitlement).

13. SMUD has existing overhead 69kV facilities along Douglas Road that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

On-Going SMUD

14. SMUD has existing underground 12kV facilities along Douglas Road that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

On-Going SMUD

15. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

On-Going SMUD

16. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

On-Going SMUD

17. All projects are subject to Sacramento Metro Air District rules at the time of construction. A complete listing of current rules is available at www.airquality.org or by calling 916-874-4800.

On-Going Sacramento
Metro Air
Quality

18. Water supply will be provided by the Sacramento County Water Agency. On-Going Sacramento County Water

19. Provide public water service to each building. On-Going Sacramento County Water

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 4 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans

20. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the Applicant to conduct a preengineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans
SMUD

21. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

22. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

23. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors). Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be found at:
https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Design-andConstruction-Services Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

24. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-ofways.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

25. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum SMUD requirements for access roads.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

26. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-feetwide: and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

27. The project has an approved Level 3 sewer study. Any changes to the approved study may require an addendum.

Prior to Submittal of
Improvement Plans
SASD

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 5 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

28. To obtain sewer service, construction of SASD sewer infrastructure will be required.

Current SASD Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SASD

29. SASD requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SASD’s sewer system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line or a separate connection to the SASD public sewer line. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SASD

30. Sewer easements may be required to service this parcel. All public sewer easements will be dedicated to SASD in a form approved by the District Engineer.

All public sewer easements will be at least 20 feet in width and will require continuous access for installation and maintenance. SASD will only provide maintenance in public right-of-ways and SASD dedicated sewer easements. No awning or overhang may encroach on the easement area. At minimum, an allweather access road must be provided to all manholes.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SASD

31. Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1-foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements.

Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10-feet (measured horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SASD

32. Permanent structures, walls, signs and footings will not be permitted within the existing SASD easement area unless express written permission is obtained from SASD.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SASD

33. All water lines shall be located within a public right-of-way or within easements dedicated to Sacramento County Water. Easements shall be reviewed and approved by Sacramento County Water Agency prior to Improvement Plan approval or Final Map approval.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
County Water

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 6 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

34. Destroy all abandoned wells on the proposed project site in accordance with the requirements of the Sacramento County Environmental Health Division. Clearly show all abandoned/destroyed wells on the improvement plans for the project.

Prior to abandoning any existing agricultural wells, applicant shall use water from agricultural wells for grading and construction.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
County Water

35. No water supply mains shall be located under structures such as box culverts and bridges. If the project will build box culverts and bridges to the ultimate width, water mains shall cross above ground attached to the side of the structures. Structures shall be designed accordingly. If the ultimate width is not being built, water mains shall cross underground routed outside of and around the ultimate structure footprint. 15-foot wide water main easements shall be dedicated for the portion outside of ROW. The crossing shall be be approved by he Agency Engineer.

Underground crossings and attachments to structures shall be included in the environmental impact analysis. Additional environmental permitting and other associated costs will be at applicant’s expense.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
County Water

36. Number, size, and location of driveways are subject to approval by the Public Works Department
Prior to Approval of
Improvement
Public Works

37. Applicant shall photo-document the condition of adjacent streets, sidewalks and infrastructure to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

38. A final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department in conjunction with improvement plan and or building permit submittal and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of permits and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC 23.716.020. The final landscape planting and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered licensed landscape architect and include the following items per RCMC 22.180.060:
 Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
 Irrigation Plan
 Soils Test
 Water Use Calculations
 Irrigation Schedule
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works/
Planning

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 7 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
 Permeability test for LID facilities’ locations
 Soil media specifications (LID features)

39. All landscape strips, medians, etc. that contain trees shall be designed to include continuous root barriers.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

40. Drainage Study: Applicant shall prepare and submit a project specific drainage study that includes but is not limited to: a pre- and post-project drainage analysis of the project impacts, identification of offsite project impacts or required offsite improvements, and identification of proposed connections to the City’s Storm Drainage System with adequate supporting calculations. The drainage study shall conform to the requirements of the Sacramento City/County Drainage Manual (Volume 2), County of Sacramento Improvement Standards (Section 9), and all other applicable City standards. The drainage study must be developed and stamped by a Professional Engineer and determined by the City to be accurate and adequate.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

41. Stormwater Quality- Post Construction
The improvement plans shall incorporate all applicable post construction stormwater quality measures; including source control (waste management areas, River Friendly Landscape, etc.) and full capture trash control measures into the site improvement plans in conformance with the most recent version of the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region. In addition, a maintenance covenant maybe required for applicable stormwater quality measures, as detailed in Appendix B of the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

42. Stormwater Quality– During Construction:

Compliance with the City’s Improvement Standards (Section 11) and Land Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance is required.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

43. The Erosion and Sediment Control plans for the site shall include a contingency plan for the implementation of a process to remove fine clay sediments prior to discharge to the City of Rancho Cordova’s storm drain system and/or Waters of the State (e.g., creeks, rivers) to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cordova. A polymer treatment system or comparable process shall be incorporated in the erosion and sediment control plan as part of the improvement plans submittal.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 8 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

44. Drainage System Design:

The applicant shall submit and obtain City approval of plans and specifications for the construction of public improvements and all grading. The drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the approved Drainage Study to accommodate runoff from the ultimate development and shall meet the City of Rancho Cordova’s Improvement Standards, construction standards, and Floodplain Management Ordinances in effect at the time of improvement plans submittal.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

45. All development within the City must comply with the City of Rancho Cordova’s Floodplain Management Ordinance. All new structures shall be protected from the 100-year (1 percent) flood event. Certified pad elevations (certified by a registered Civil Engineer or licensed Land Surveyor) shall be set at least one and two tenths foot (1.2') above all sources of 100-year flooding (see Section 9-1 of improvement standards). The overland release path must be shown on the improvement plans and the hydraulic computation must be provided to estimate the flow depths along the overland release paths. The calculations must be in conformance with Section 9-15 of the Improvement Standards.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

46. Provide a permanent concrete stamp, or other permanently applied message to the satisfaction of the City not including paint, which reads “No Dumping-Flows to Creek” or other approved message at each storm drain inlet.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

47. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

48. Show the design for a fire access roadway of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width, 13-feet, 6-inches of vertical clearance, and turning radii of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside dimension on the improvement plans. The access roadway shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any proposed building. The use of turf-block or grass-crete or similar alternate road surfaces is not approved for installation in fire apparatus access roadways.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metro Fire

49. Show the design for an approved fire apparatus turnaround. The fire apparatus turnaround shall conform to Sacramento Metro Fire Districts, Fire Prevention Standard #3. Fire access turn-around shall be located within 50 feet of the end of the access roadway.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metro Fire

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 9 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

50. Show on the plans how Fire Lanes will be marked. Fire Lane identification shall be provided along the required fire access roadway. Fire Lane identification shall be in accordance with the Sacramento Metro Fire Districts Fire Prevention Standard #3 and the California Vehicle Code. Vehicle parking is prohibited on any street less than 28 feet in width. Vehicle parking is permitted on both sides of streets 36 feet or more in width. Roadway widths shall be measured between the gutter-line or edge of pavement on opposite sides of the road. Identification of fire apparatus access roadways may be required on private roads.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metro Fire

51. Provide a note on the plan that reads, “Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed live load of 80,000 pounds, with a maximum axle load of 31,000 pounds, and meet Public Works Standards for roadways. A report, prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer, verifying the ability of the road to bear the required minimum weight, shall be submitted with any plan indicating construction of roadway. Verification of constructed roadway shall be provided by a registered geotechnical engineer prior to final of the project.” Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metro Fire

52. Show the location of the required fire hydrants for this project on the improvement plans. Approved fire hydrants capable of providing the required fire flow for the protection of any and all structures shall be located along the fire apparatus access roadway. The required fire hydrants shall be installed and operational prior to any construction, (including foundations) or on-site storage of combustible materials.

The minimum required fire flow for the protection of commercial developments is 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) at a pressure of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) for a two-hour duration.

Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metro Fire

53. Provide Fire Access Agreement between all parcels connected to and served by fire access. Fire Access Agreement shall be recorded with the Public Recorders Office having Jurisdiction.

Prior to
Recordation of the
Final Map
Sacramento
Metro Fire

54. Provide Fire Access Roadway Maintenance Agreement (RMA) between all parcels connected to and served by the fire access roadway. The Fire Access Roadway Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction. The roadway maintenance agreement shall include the following:
a) Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface Prior to
Recordation of the
Final Map
Sacramento
Metro Fire

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 10 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
b) Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen fee six inches (13’-6”) or width of twenty feet (20”)
c) Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of NO PARKINGFIRE LANE signage or striping. d) Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening systems
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits

55. Construction plans must include all windows and final architectural element details to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. This includes all building fixtures, exterior lighting, walkway lighting, parking lot lighting, and street-lights on the Site, Utility, Landscape, and Building Plans, prior to the issuance of any permits. The height and style of fixtures shall be shown. Energy-saving fixtures shall be used and noted on the plans and all illumination shall be installed in a manner that is glare shielded and directed away from adjacent properties and right-of-ways.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning

56. Applicant shall complete improvement plans to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Improvement plans shall include, but shall not be limited to:
 All onsite civil improvements
 Civil plan shall include an ADA access plan
 All facilities, including but not limited to, sidewalk, driveways, etc. shall be upgraded to meet current ADA requirements and City Standards.  Utility laterals
 Replacement of damaged sidewalk and curb and gutter along property frontage to the satisfaction of The Public Works Department. Sidewalk panels shall be replaced to the nearest joint
 Replacement of damaged pavement along property frontage to the satisfaction of The Public Works Department
 Public improvement plans shall clearly delineate all transitions to existing improvements
 All improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 11 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

57. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.) Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
SMUD

58. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
SMUD

59. The owner must contact the Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-6100 to determine if sewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
SASD

60. The Final Design of the project shall include bicycle parking as required by Chapter

23.719.110 and shall be designed according to the APBP Bicycle Parking Guidelines.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning/ Air
Quality

61. The applicant shall meet the following: Civil Site Plans and Architectural Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to Final Building Permit being issued.

Prior to Issuance of
Final Building
Permit
Fire

62. Rooftop equipment (HVAC, meters, refrigeration equipment, plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers), shall be screened from view on all sides with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure. Screening details shall be shown on the Building Plans and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits and installed prior to occupancy approval.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning

63. The applicant shall meet the following: Civil Site Plans and Architectural Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to Final Building Permit being issued.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
Metro Fire

64. Where a bridge or elevated surface is part of the fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB-17 Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
Metro Fire

65. Prior to issuance of building permits require water intensive commercial and industrial building permit applicants to conduct a water use efficiency review and submit the finding sin required environmental documentation for the project.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
County Water

66. Prior to the issuance of building permits require efficient cooling systems, recirculating pumps for fountains and pods, and water recycling systems for vehicle washing as a condition of service.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
County Water

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 12 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

67. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the project developer/owner shall pay Zone 40 development fees applicable at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with Title 4 of the Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) Code.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
County Water

68. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the project shall confirm to the specific provisions of the City of Rancho Cordova Landscaping Ordinance (Municipal Code Title 23, Chapter 23.716).

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
County Water
Prior to Final inspection/Certificate of Occupancy

69. Install improvements per the approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Prior to Final
Building Inspection
of the first unit
Public Works

70. Record drawings of grading and improvement plans (1 full size and 1 half size hard copy), as well as a compact disc containing said plans in AutoCAD and pdf format, and a GIS shape file, or equivalent to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Department.

Prior to Final
Building Inspection

71. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping, the designer shall certify that the landscape complies with all city water conserving landscape requirements.

Certification shall be accomplished by completion of a certificate of compliance on a form approved by the director of the City Public Works Department. Failure to submit a complete and accurate certificate of compliance will delay final approval of the project and/or discontinue water service per RCMC 22.180.090. Upon receipt of the certificate of compliance and site inspection from City staff, the landscaping performance bond will be released.

Prior to Final
Building Inspection
Public Works

72. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new or existing buildings in such a position as to be easily read from the street or road fronting the property. The minimum size of the numbers shall not be less than six (6) inches and shall be mounted immediately adjacent to a light source and shall also contrast with their background.

Prior to Granting
Final Occupancy
Sacramento
Metro Fire
ADVISORY:

1. Sacramento Metro Fire
a. Any gate shall be installed in accordance with The County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers Standard. Plan submittal is required prior to installation.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT – Dutch Bros Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 13 of 13 Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros PLND-1021-0013 March 21, 2022 Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review

2. Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD)
a. SASD Design Standards and Specifications require minimum 6-inch lower laterals for commercial and industrial buildings.
b. Construction of a grease trap or a sand oil separator may be required. The Applicant must verify with the applicable jurisdiction’s building department.
c. If the proposed garbage enclosure will contain a drain to the sewer, it must be covered. d. Any use of SASD sewer easements, which is not compatible or interferes with the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, or repair of SASD sanitary sewer(s), must not be allowed. Each proposed use must be reviewed and approved in writing by the District Engineer prior to the use of the easement by the Grantor. This includes landscaping.

3. Sacramento Air Quality
a. Where feasible, it is recommended that any new or repaved areas have an albedo of at least 0.25-0.5. It is also recommended that the roof on the new structure utilize a certified cool roof material. For parking lots where cool pavements or tree shading are not feasible, please consider solar photovoltaic shad structures to reduce urban heat islands, generate renewable energy, and provide shading to parked vehicles.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 4

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 4

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 4

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 12

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 11.1.

DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: PROJECT SUNRISE MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW AND RIO DEL ORO PHASE 5 FINAL MAP – PROJECT NO. PLND-0821-0003: - LOCATED WITHIN RIO DEL ORO SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL 71
____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS:

Alta Vista LLC
340 Palladio Parkway, Suite 521
Folsom, CA 95630
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

Panattoni Development Company, Inc.
8775 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95826
PROJECT: The Applicant is requesting a Major Design Review for a new 629,186 square foot single story warehouse distribution building with 132 docks doors, a mezzanine platform, offices, and site improvements, including landscaping, truck loading docks, trailer and associate parking. The request also includes a final map for Rio Del Oro Phase 5.

FILE: PLND-0821-0003
LOCATION: Located within Rio Del Oro Specific, known as Plan Parcel 71. Southwest corner of Future Rancho Cordova Parkway and International Drive, A portion of APN 072-0370-106-0000
APN:

ZONING:

A portion of 072-0370-106-0000
MP Industrial Office Park (RDOSP)

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution for the Rio Del Ordo Phase 5 Final Map, Determine the Project Sunrise project Exempt from CEQA per Section 15183, consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning for which an EIR was certified; and Adopt the Resolution for Project Sunrise Major Design Review.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the final map Resolutions will authorize the City to enter into Subdivision Improvement Agreement Contract No. 2022-37, guaranteeing the construction of public roads and utilities with Alta Vista, LLC and the recording of the final subdivision map creating commercial/industrial zoned lots, a neighborhood park, and a green belt located south of White Rock Road and east of Luyung Drive.

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 12
Adoption of the Resolution for the Project Sunrise Major Design Review for the construction of a new 629,186 sq. ft single story warehouse distribution building would allow the applicant to pursue necessary building permits for new construction.

BACKGROUND
On September 20, 2010, the City Council approved the Rio Del Oro (RDO) Specific Plan by adoption of Ordinance 14-2010. The City Council adopted Resolution 92-2010 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environment Impact Statement (State Clearinghouse #2003122057) for the RDO Specific Plan, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

RIO DEL ORO PHASE 5 FINAL MAP
The map has been examined and checked for compliance with Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova Municipal code and the California Subdivision Map Act. The City Council approved the Large Lot Tentative Map on September 19, 2016. A Development Agreement was entered on December 6, 2010. The City and Elliott Homes executed an Amended and Restated Development Agreement on October 19, 2016. A copy of the final map, Attachment 3, and copy of the vicinity map, Attachment 4, are included with this staff report. Elliott Homes submitted a revision to their Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, Rio Del Oro on March 3, 2022. The revision to the tentative map was found to be in substantial compliance with the originally approved tentative map on March 9, 2022. The substantial compliance tentative map is included as Attachment 5.

Roads are offered for dedication with this subdivision. Alta Vista, LLC has provided a performance and labor and material bond guaranteeing the construction of the public improvements. Wood Rodgers has waived the requirement for a bond to guarantee payment for setting the survey monuments with the subdivision. The soil report requirement has been satisfied by Wood Rodgers, dated November 2019.

There are no delinquent taxes against the property and the Tax Collector has so certified. The 2022/2023 estimated taxes have been secured with the Sacramento County Tax Collector.

MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW
The project site is vacant and zoned MP Industrial Office Park within the Rio Del Oro Specific Plan. The project is referred to as Parcel 71 and is on the southwest corner of future extensions of Rancho Cordova Parkway and International Drive (See Figure 1).

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 12
Figure 1: Site Location
Surrounding Land Use:

The following Table provides the current use, General Plan/Community Plan, and zoning of the adjacent properties (Table 1).

Table 1: Surrounding Designations and Existing Uses
Location Existing Use
General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation
North Vacant RDO SP Business Park
East Vacant RDO SP
Business Park and Local
Town Center
South Vacant RDO SP
Business Park and Industrial
Office Park
West Vacant RDO SP
Greenbelt and Heavy
Industrial

ANALYSIS
The Applicant is requesting a Major Design Review for a new 629,186 square foot single story warehouse distribution building with 132 docks doors, a mezzanine platform, 47,536 sf. ft. of

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 12
office space, and site improvements, including landscaping, truck loading docks, trailer and associate parking. Pursuant to Section 2.4.5.2 of the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines, a warehouse and/or local and regional distribution facility with multiple-bay shipping and receiving truck loading docks is a permitted use.

Site Plan Layout
As shown in the attached project plans and in Figure 2, the proposed building is situated centrally on the project site. Loading docks are included on three sides of the building, with the main entrance and employee parking facing Rancho Cordova Parkway. Numerous pedestrian pathways are provided to provide employees with the ability to travel to the buildings safely but to also walk from the building out to the site and onto the surrounding roadways.

The proposed project meets the Rio del Oro Specific Plan Design guidelines with the following features and amenities that benefit the built environment and protect environmental resources to improve the overall quality of life of the community:
- Automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit connections are encouraged through adjacent bus connection, trail connections, on-site ride share and pedestrian shelters, bicycle parking, and employee showers.
- Landscaping and sound walls will help screen the facility from the adjacent community. - Truck circulation has been designed to help reduce noise transmission to residential areas.
- Sign locations will respect the surrounding context to minimize any negative impact on the visual environment.
- Outdoor lighting fixtures will utilize LED to provide maximum energy efficiency as well as effective lighting.
- Light shielding will be utilized to limit light pollution and direct outdoor lighting downward and away from sensitive receptors.

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 12
 Figure 2: Project Site Plan
Traffic and Circulation:

Efficient and clearly marked on-site traffic circulation is a critical part of a project of this size and nature. With various trucks coming in and out of the site, the proposed onsite circulation pattern will minimize any conflicts. Trucks will enter the site off Gold Dredge Way near the western edge of the property. The trucks will then exit the site from another driveway further to the east on Gold Dredge Way. The truck traffic will head west on Gold Dredge, through the industrial area and out to Sunrise Blvd. Employees have various options to enter and exit the employee parking area, which includes access points on International Drive and Rancho Cordova Parkway. This area is separate from the truck staging, storage and loading areas of the site.

Various infrastructure improvements and with timing necessary to provide multi-modal access to and from the site are included in the phasing plan, Attachment 10. Improvements include, but are not limited to, trails, sidewalks, International Drive, Rancho Cordova Parkway, Gold Dredge Drive, and preparation of existing roadways west of the proposed site as necessary to receive heavy truck traffic.

Additional traffic review was done by NV5, a consultant, that took into consideration the efforts done with the EIR for the RDO Specific Plan. Conclusion of the report stated:

Site access will be provided by six driveways. Four driveways are proposed for personal vehicles and two driveways are proposed for line-haul trucks. The driveways are anticipated to operate efficiently as side street stop-controlled intersections. A total of 3,532 daily trips will be generated by the site, with 132 (86 entering, 46 exiting) during the AM standard peak hour and 510 (99 entering, 411 exiting) during the PM standard peak hour. The project is anticipated to be complete by 2023.

Based upon their analysis, the following conclusions were made:

City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 12
Build (2023)
 The proposed site is consistent with the Rio del Oro Specific Plan zoning.  The addition of project traffic to the study network does not result in any intersections operating at a Level of Service worse that D. All intersections perform similarly to No Build (2023), with expected increases in delays. Project driveways operate at LOS A.

Build+ (2023)
 With the exception of, White Rock Road at Sunrise Boulevard where LOS will drop to E during the evening peak hour, all intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service.
 Sunrise Boulevard / White Rock Road: As the intersection of Sunrise Boulevard and White Rock Road experiences an increase in congestion over time, we recommend the City consider other improvement options such as dual right-turn lanes on the westbound approach to the intersection.
 Project driveways operate at LOS A.
 Street or driveway connections to the property opposite the Receiving Center on Gold Dredge Way should either be aligned with the Receiving Center’s driveways or offset a minimum of 150 feet or a sufficient length to accommodate left-turn queues into all driveways.

Parking:

The project site provides a variety of parking stalls options for employees, including standard stall, accessible stalls, bicycle parking, van pool and numerous electric vehicle and future vehicle charging stations. There are also truck trailer parking areas for the trucks that would be coming into and out of the site.

Elevations:

The proposed elevations are typical of a tilt-up concrete industrial building. Various colors and elevation relief have been incorporated into the design to try and break up the long expansive walls. Additional materials include high performance glazing windows, metal and bronzed aluminum. Steps up and down in the roofline and pop out features help to break up the massing of the buildings. (See Figures 3-5).

City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 12
Figure 3 – Colored Elevations

City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 12
Figure 4 – Colored Renderings (View From International)

City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 12
Figure 5 – Colored Renderings (View from Rancho Cordova Parkway) Lighting:

The project has proposed adequate lighting throughout the property that meets the requirements for Chapter 23.725: Outdoor Lighting as well as the requirements and standards of Chapter 23.719.090: Design standards for surface parking lots, of the Rancho Cordova Zoning Code.

City Council Staff Report – Page 10 of 12
Landscaping:

The project proposes significant landscaping improvements along the boundary of the site and internal to it. Lines of screen trees have been planted internal to the site, as well as along the roadway to help with screening of the site. The project has been reviewed for compliance with applicable shade canopy requirements and the project plans show that the site plan is meeting the minimum 50% shade coverage for required parking areas.

Figure 6 – Proposed Landscape Plan
MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS:

The Major Design Review Permit, as conditioned, adheres to the approval findings defined by Zoning Code section 23.140.070, as follows:

A. Finding: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, complies with applicable zoning regulations, Specific Plan provisions, and special planning area provisions, and is consistent with the applicable Rancho Cordova design guidelines.

Evidence: The proposed project is consistent with the purpose and intent of adopted policies and regulations, including the RDO Specific Plan. The use is listed as a permitted used within the plan and was analyzed against the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent in height, setbacks, and architectural requirements of the plan. The project meets the applicable parking, lighting, and landscape requirements of the Zoning Code. The use is

City Council Staff Report – Page 11 of 12
not requesting any deviations, exemptions, or variances from standards that apply to the site.

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The site design, building architecture, and landscape plan are consistent with the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines and Zoning Code. The proposed building is located in the most suitable location on the site that provides adequate emergency safety access to the buildings, on-site circulation needs and overall suitability of the site. The proposed project material and colors are consistent with the area design guidelines and incorporate additional architectural character into a future developing area.

C. Finding: The architecture, including the character, scale, and quality of the design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements, establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of existing or anticipated buildings on adjoining and nearby properties.

Evidence: The proposed project design is consistent with the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines. The design, color, and materials have been designed to integrate and compliment the future developed surrounding area, but also provide additional architectural character to the area. Lighting plans have been provided showing minimum light spill out to the property line.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Evidence: The proposed project will not substantially affect current traffic flows or existing modes of transportation circulation. Ingress and egress to the site will be from various points along Rancho Cordova Parkway, International Drive and Gold Dredge Way. Some of these access points will accommodate one-way traffic, while others will have an in and out lane. Additionally, these access points may only be a right-in-rightout. There will be adequate signage throughout the site to avoid any circulation conflicts.

Bike racks have been included in the site plan.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project exempt from CEQA per Section 15183, consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning for which an EIR was certified. The City Council adopted Resolution 92- 2010 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environment Impact Statement (State Clearinghouse #2003122057) for the RDO Specific Plan, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The proposed project is a permitted use within the RDO Specific Plan and was contemplated in the previously certified EIR/EIS. Additional traffic analysis was conducted for the project against the previous EIR/EIS and was found to be consistent in terms of traffic and transportation. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared as part of the original RDO Specific Plan approval and all projects are subject to those applicable mitigation measures. A condition

City Council Staff Report – Page 12 of 12
of approval has been placed on the proejct that requires compliance with applciable mitigation measures such as pre construction surveys. The Sacramento Air Quality Management District has reviewed the project and found it to be consistent with the RDO Specific Plan Air Quality Management Plan. No additional studies were required of the proposed project, as it will adhere to the previously certified EIR/EIS.

RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Adopt the Resolution for the Rio Del Ordo Phase 5 Final Map, determine the Project Sunrise project Exempt from CEQA per Section 15183, consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning for which an EIR was certified; and adopt the Resolution for Rio Del Oro Delivery Station Major Design Review.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution for RDO Phase 5 Final Map

2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement

3. RDO-PH5-LLM-20220307

4. VMAP RDO Ph5

5. Substantial Compliance Map

6. Resolution for Project Sunrise Major Design Review

7. Exhibit A to the Resolution – Project Plans

8. Exhibit B to the Resolution – Conditions of Approval

9. Exhibit C to the Resolution – RDO MMRP

10. Exhibit D to the Resolution – Phasing Plan

11. Supplemental Studies

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF RIO DEL ORO PHASE 5, SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2019-004-05, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT CONTRACT NO. 2022-37
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Large Lot Tentative Map on September 19, 2016 per Resolution No. 107-2016; and
WHEREAS, Elliott Homes submitted a revision to their Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, Rio Del Oro on March 3, 2022. And the revision to the tentative map was found to be in substantial compliance with the originally approved tentative map on March 9, 2022; and WHEREAS, the map is in substantial compliance with the approved tentative map and the substantial compliance exhibit; and
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the map complies with Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova municipal code and the California Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the approval of final maps is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Regulation Section 15268(b)(3) as a ministerial approval.

WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with the developer to ensure necessary public improvements are completed and secured with a bond.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does approve the Final Map of Rio Del Oro Phase 5, Subdivision No. FM-2019-004-05 and does authorize the City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement 2022-37 with Alta Vista, LLC, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st day of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3

WHITE ROCK RD

SUNRISE
BLVD

RANCHO CORDOVA PKWY
SUNRISE PARK DR £¤50

JACKSON RD

W HITE R OCK RD

KIE FER BLVD

DOUGLAS RD

FAIR OAKS BLVD
¯
Aerial Photo Date: March 2018

LOCATION MAP
Path: X:\GIS_Staff\PROJECTS\PUBLIC_WORKS\DEVELOPMENT\SUBDIVISIONS\Subdivision_Vicinity_Maps\Pro_Project\Subdivision_Vicinity_Maps.aprx | Date: 2/10/2022 DETAIL
AREA

FINAL MAP OF
RIO DEL ORO PHASE 5
0 750 1,500
Feet
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 4

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 5

ITEM 11.1 ATTACHMENT 6
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR PROJECT SUNRISE PROJECT NO. PLND-0821-0003
WHEREAS, Panattoni Development Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Applicant) filed an application with the City of Rancho Cordova for a Major Design Review approval for Project Sunrise; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the appropriate authority to hear and take action on this project; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located within the Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Parcel 71; southwest corner of future extensions of Rancho Cordova Parkway and International Drive; a portion of APN 072-0370-106-0000; and
WHEREAS, the project was analyzed as part of the Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) which was adopted by Resolution 92-2010 certifying the Final EIR/EIS (State Clearinghouse #2003122057); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova has conducted a properly noticed public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented during the March 21, 2022 hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The proposed project is exempt from CEQA under Guidelines Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, and Zoning Code. The following evidence supports the CEQA exemption.

Finding: The project has been analyzed and is exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15183 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, and Zoning Code. The following evidence supports the CEQA exemption.

Evidence: The project exempt from CEQA per Section 15183, consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning for which an EIR was certified. The City Council adopted Resolution 92-2010 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environment Impact Statement (State Clearinghouse #2003122057) for the RDO Specific Plan, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The proposed project is a permitted use within the RDO Specific Plan and was contemplated in the previously certified EIR/EIS. Additional traffic analysis was conducted for the project against the previous EIR/EIS and was found to be consistent in terms of traffic and transportation. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared as part of the original RDO Specific Plan approval and all projects are subject to those applicable mitigation measures. A condition of approval has been placed on the proejct that requires compliance with applciable mitigation measures such as pre construction surveys.

The Sacramento Air Quality Management District has reviewed the project and found it to be

ITEM 11.1 ATTACHMENT 6
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 3
consistent with the RDO Specific Plan Air Quality Management Plan. No additional studies were required of the proposed project, as it will adhere to the previously certified EIR/EIS.

2. Approve the Major Design Review, subject to the Major Design Review Package (Exhibit A), the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B), and Phasing Plan (Exhibit D); supported by the following Findings and Evidence, as required by Zoning Code Section 23.140.070:

A. Finding: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, complies with applicable zoning regulations, Specific Plan provisions, and special planning area provisions, and is consistent with the applicable Rancho Cordova design guidelines.

Evidence: The proposed project is consistent with the purpose and intent of adopted policies and regulations, including the RDO Specific Plan. The use is listed as a permitted used within the plan and was analyzed against the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent in height, setbacks, and architectural requirements of the plan. The project meets the applicable parking, lighting, and landscape requirements of the Zoning Code. The use is not requesting any deviations, exemptions, or variances from standards that apply to the site.

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The site design, building architecture, and landscape plan are consistent with the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines and Zoning Code. The proposed building is located in the most suitable location on the site that provides adequate emergency safety access to the buildings, on-site circulation needs and overall suitability of the site. The proposed project material and colors are consistent with the area design guidelines and incorporate additional architectural character into a future developing area.

C. Finding: The architecture, including the character, scale, and quality of the design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements, establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of existing or anticipated buildings on adjoining and nearby properties.

Evidence: The proposed project design is consistent with the RDO Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines. The design, color, and materials have been designed to integrate and compliment the future developed surrounding area, but also provide additional architectural character to the area. Lighting plans have been provided showing minimum light spill out to the property line.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Evidence: The proposed project will not substantially affect current traffic flows or existing modes of transportation circulation. Ingress and egress to the site will be from various points along Rancho Cordova Parkway, International Drive and Gold Dredge

ITEM 11.1 ATTACHMENT 6
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 3
Way. Some of these access points will accommodate one-way traffic, while others will have an in and out lane. Additionally, these access points may only be a right-in-rightout. There will be adequate signage throughout the site to avoid any circulation conflicts.

Bike racks have been included in the site plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st day of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

F R O N T

FR O N T
T
G
T
T
211
314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 551 451 351 251 151 941 841 741 641 541 441 341 241 141 041 931 831 731 631 531 431 331 231 131 031 921 821 721 621 521 421 321 221 121 024111 911 811 711 511 311 111 011 901 801 701 601 501 401 301 201 224 223 222 221 220 219 218 217 216 215 214 213 212 211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313
232 231 230 229 228 227 226 225
611
L
B
B
B
L
B
L
L
H
H
D
H
D
Y
Y
D
Y
Y D
H
VAN

NAV NAV
VAN
VAN

NAV NAV
VAN
417' - 1"

FIRE TANK AND

PUMP HOUSE

SITE SECURITY FENCE

PRE-FABRICATED

GUARD HOUSE

PRE-FABRICATED

GUARD HOUSE
ROOF
ACCESS
STAIR

ELECTRICAL ROOM & FIRE

ACCESS CONTROL PANEL

FIRE CONTROL ROOM

RECRUITMENT
ENTRY

PRE-FABRICATED

EXTERIOR BREAK AREA
CANOPY

PRE-FABRICATED

EXTERIOR BREAK

AREA CANOPY

ELECTRICAL
ROOM

TRAILER STORAGE

TRAILER STORAGE

TRAILER STORAGE

TRAILER STORAGE

EASEMENT -

REFER TO CIVIL
533' - 2"
315' - 4"

PRE-FABRICATED SHELTER

MONUMENT
SIGN

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PUBLIC

WAY TO BUILDING ENTRANCE

MOTORCYCLE PARKING

MAIN BUILDING ENTRANCE

FIRE TRUCK STAGING

EMERGENCY

GENERATOR

AUGER COMPACTOR AUGER

EV TRUCK
STALLS (2)

FUTURE EV
TRUCK
STALLS (8)

RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY

INTERNATIONAL DRIVE

GOLD DREDGE WAY

KNOX BOX KNOX BOX KNOX BOX

KNOX BOX KNOX BOX
KNOX
BOX
KNOX
BOX

SOUND WALL

BUS STOP

TRUCK EXIT
TRUCK
ENTRY

ASSOCIATE

ENTRY/EXIT

ASSOCIATE

ENTRY/EXIT

ASSOCIATE

ENTRY/EXIT

ASSOCIATE

ENTRY/EXIT
PARCEL 73B
PARCEL 73E
PARCEL 72C PARCEL 72D
PARCEL 72B
PARCEL 73A
PARCEL 72A
PARCEL 69C
PARCEL 69A PARCEL 69B
PARCEL 74B

DETENTION BASIN

CUSTOMER

SUBSTATION

STORMWATER BASIN

STORMWATER
BASIN

STORMWATER BASIN

ASSOCIATE

ENTRY/EXIT

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

FROM PUBLIC WAY TO

BUILDING ENTRANCE

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

FROM PUBLIC WAY TO

BUILDING ENTRANCE

MONUMENT SIGN
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
A2.15
2A
P.U.E.
20' - 0"
x x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x x x x x x x x x
x
x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x
x x x x x
x
x x
x
x
x x
C C
C
C
C
A14.09
5A
V
V V
V
V
V V
V

KNOX BOX

KNOX BOX

BICYCLE STORAGE

LOCKERS

BICYCLE STORAGE

LOCKERS

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

TO BUILDING

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

TO BUILDING

KNOX BOX

EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR
EARR
EARR
EARR
EARR
EARR
EARR

EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR EARR
AM
EARR

BICYCLE RACKS

KNOX BOX

ELECTRICAL ROOM

KNOX BOX

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

TO BUILDING

PLAN KEY
- ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE
- INSTALLED EV CAR CHARGER
- FUTURE EV READY

V - ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING SPACE

C - CLEAN AIR / VAN POOL / EV

EAAR - EXTERIOR AREA OF ASSISTED RESCUE

AM - AMBULATORY
- ACCESSIBLE ENTRY/EXIT TO BUILDING
*ALL WAREHOUSE EXITS CONTAIN EXTERIOR

AREAS OF ASSISTED RESCUE
© DLR Group

REVISIONS
2/8/2022 3:01:11 PM
75-21908-00

12.02.2021 PROJECT SUNRISE

CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS

ARCHITECTURAL

SITE PLAN
AS1.1 PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
TRUE
N
SCALE: 1" = 100'-0"

ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
BUILDING FOOTPRINT = +/- 629,186 SF
130 LOADING DOCKS
702 TRAILER PARKING STALLS (702 TARGET)
832 TOTAL TRAILER LOCATIONS (832 TARGET)
1,008 CAR PARKING STALLS (1,000 TARGET)
APPROXIMATE GROSS SITE AREA: +/-88.80 AC
APPROXIMATE NET AREA: +/-83.36 AC
Zoning - (LI) Light Industrial
Gross Site Area - 88.80 Acres
Net Site Area - 83.36 Acres
Building Footprint - 629,186 SF
Lot Coverage - 17.3%
Building Height - 50'-2"
Front Setback Required - 20'-0"
Side Setback Required - 30'-0" at corner streets, 20'-0" at interior sies Vehicle Parking Required (Rio Del Oro Specific Plan) - 1 / employee = 1,000 Spaces Vehicle Parking Provided - 1,008 spaces
Accessible Parking Required - 20 + 1/100 over 1,000 = 21 spaces Accessible Parking Provided - 24 spaces (8 van, 16 car) Bicycle Parking Required (CALGreen 2019 x Rio Del Oro Air Quality & Emissions Reduction Plan) - .05 x 1,008 x 1.20= 61
Bicycle Parking Provided - 62 spaces
CLEAN AIR / VAN POOL / EV Required (Rio Del Oro Air Quality & Emissions Reduction Plan) - .10 x 1,008 = 101 spaces
CLEAN AIR / VAN POOL / EV Provided - 101 spaces
EVSE Installed Required (City of Rancho Cordova) = 2 spaces EVSE Installed Provided - 2 spaces
EVSE Future Ready Required (CALGreen 2019) - .06 x 1,008 = 61 spaces EVSE Future Ready Provided - 60 spaces + 2 installed = 62 total

PROJECT DATA
ADD#001 02.08.2022
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001 ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
C-27769 EXP. 5-31-23Attachment A11 to Addendum ADD#001 dated February 8, 2022 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7 Exhibit A to the Resolution

605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H.
605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H. 605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H. 605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H. OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES (TYPICAL) OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES (TYPICAL) OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES (TYPICAL) OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES (TYPICAL) FIRE TANK SEE SHEETS LA-2 & LA-3 FOR PARKING LOT SHADING DESIGNATIONS. ACACIA ANEURA/MULGA 24" BOX 26 ACER TRUNCATUM/SHANTUNG MAPLE 24" BOX 14 CEDRUS DEODARA/DEODAR CEDAR 15 GALLON 137 CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS/WESTERN REDBUD STANDARD 24" BOX 64 ERYTHRINA CRISTA-GALLI/COCKSPUR CORAL TREE 24" BOX 32 LAURUS NOBILIS "SARATOGA"/GRECIAN LAUREL 24" BOX 25 PARKINSONIA X. 'DESERT MUSEUM'/PALO VERDE 15 GALLON 61 PISTACIA CHINENSIS/CHINESE PISTACHE 15 GALLON 88 QUERCUS LOBATA/VALLEY OAK* 15 GALLON 178 QUERCUS WISLIZENII/INTERIOR LIVE OAK 15 GALLON 125 SCHINUS MOLLE/CALIF. PEPPER 15 GALLON 69 SOPHORA JAPONICA/JAPANESE PAGODA TREE 24" BOX 52 ULMUS PROPINQUA 'EMERALD SUNSHINE'/HYBRID ELM 24" BOX 32 __________ ____________ __________ SIGNATURE DATE I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN. SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA (SEE PLANT PALETTE AT RIGHT) WATER QUALITY BASIN (SEE PLANTS MARKED "*" IN THE PLANT PALETTE AT RIGHT) TURF AREA, RECREATIONAL SOD EDGING, STEEL (BLACK, 4" DEPTH) CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE FOR INTERSECTIONS AT PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS & PUBLIC STREETS. NO OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL EXCEED 2'-6" IN HEIGHT. JUNIPERUS C. "SAN JOSE"/SAN JOSE JUNIPER 1 GALLON JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO'/PROSTRATE JUNIPER 1 GALLON IRIS DOUGLASIANA/DOUGLAS IRIS 1 GALLON HESPERALOE X. 'BRAKE LIGHTS'/HYBRID RED YUCCA 2 GALLON DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LITTLE REV'/BLACK FLAX LILY 5 GALLON DIETES BICOLOR 5 GALLON CAREX DIVULSA/EURASIAN GRAY SEDGE (15" O.C. TRIANG.)* LINERS COTONEASTER D. "LOWFAST"/PROSTRATE COTONEASTER 1 GALLON CALLISTEMON V. 'LITTLE JOHN'/DWF. BOTTLE BRUSH 5 GALLON CISTUS SALVIIFOLIUS/SAGELEAF ROCKROSE 1 GALLON CISTUS HYBRIDUS/WHITE ROCKROSE 5 GALLON CISTUS COBARIENSIS 'LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE'/YELLOW ROCKROSE 5 GALLON CHONDROPETALUM ELEPHANTINUM/CAPE RUSH* 5 GALLON BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIGEON POINT'/DWF. COYOTE BRUSH* 1 GALLON AGAVE WEBERI/WEBER AGAVE 5 GALLON AGAVE X. 'BLUE GLOW'/BLUE GLOW AGAVE 5 GALLON ASCLEPIAS SPECIOSA/SHOWY MILK WEED 1 GALLON ARCTOSTAPHYLOS D. "HOWARD McMINN"/MANZANITA* 5 GALLON ACACIA REDOLENS "DESERT CARPET"/PROSTRATE ACACIA 1 GALLON TULBAGHIA VIOLACEA/SOCIETY GARLIC 1 GALLON TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS/DWARF GERMANDER 1 GALLON SALVIA C.'WINNEFRED GILMAN'/COMPACT CLEVELAND SAGE 5 GALLON SALVIA X. 'BEE'S BLISS'/CREEPING SAGE* 1 GALLON ROSMARINUS O. "COLLINGWOOD INGRAM"/ROSEMARY 1 GALLON ROSA CALIFORNICA/WILD ROSE* 5 GALLON PYRACANTHA F. "SANTA CRUZ"/PROSTRATE PYRACANTHA 1 GALLON PYRACANTHA F. "MOHAVE"/MOHAVE PYRACANTHA 5 GALLON PENSTEMON HETEROPHYLLUS 'MARGARITA B.O.P.'/BEARD TONGUE 1 GALLON PANICUM VIRGATUM 'SHENANDOAH'/SWITCH GRASS* 1 GALLON NANDINA DOMESTICA 'GULF STREAM'/DWF. HEAVENLY BAMBOO 5 GALLON NERIUM O. "DWARF RED"/PETITE RED OLEANDER 5 GALLON MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM/CREEPING BOOBIALLA 1 GALLON MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS/DEER GRASS* 5 GALLON MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS/PURPLE MUHLY GRASS 1 GALLON MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM/OREGON GRAPE 5 GALLON MACFADYENA UNGUIS-CATI/CATS CLAW VINE 5 GALLON LIMONIUM PEREZII/SEA LAVENDER 1 GALLON LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'LOMLON'/LIME TUFF DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GALLON KNIPHOFIA UVARIA 'FLAMENCO'/RED HOT POKER 1 GALLON *PLANTS SUITABLE FOR WATER QUALITY BASIN USE 20' DIA. TREES CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS 314 S.F. 0 0 4 0 628 S.F. ERYTHRINA C. 314 S.F. 0 0 1 0 157 S.F. 20' TOTAL: 785 S.F. 25' DIA. TREES PARKINSONIA X. 490 S.F. 0 0 4 0 980 S.F. ULMUS PROPINQUA 490 S.F. 0 24 2 0 9310 S.F. 25' TOTAL: 10290 S.F. 35' DIA. TREES CEDRUS DEODARA 962 S.F. 55 0 25 0 64935 S.F. PISTACHIA CHINENSIS 962 S.F. 85 1 1 0 82973 S.F. QUERCUS LOBATA 962 S.F. 0 0 3 0 1443 S.F. QUERCUS WISLIZENII 962 S.F. 0 1 1 0 1203 S.F. SCHINUS MOLLE 962 S.F. 30 5 23 0 43531 S.F. SOPHORA JAPONICA 962 S.F. 33 0 0 0 31746 S.F. 35' TOTAL: 225830 S.F. 20'x20' 25'x25' 70'x35' 20'x20' 20'x20' 40'x30' 25'x25' 40'x40' 80'x80' 60'x80' 40'x50' 40'x30' 50'x60' 2'x12' 4'x8' 3'x4' 2'x2' 5'x8' 2'x8' 4'x6' 2'x5' 4'x8' 2'x10' 3'x8' 1'x10' 1'x2' 3'x5' 2'x3' 2'x2' 1'x2' 2'x10' 2'x8' 3'x4' 3'x4' 3'x4' 30'x30' 4'x6' 3'x4' 3'x6' 1'x12' 3'x5' 2'x2' 3'x4' 1'x3' 8'x12' 2'x8' 4'x8' 2'x6' 2'x8' 2'x6' 2'x4' 2'x3' GRASSES, NATIVE PERENNIAL 1' HYDROSEED 1. 25% OF ALL TREES WILL BE 24" BOX SIZE. PROPOSED TREE QUANTITY: 903 REQUIRED 24" BOX SIZE: 226 24" BOX TREES PROVIDED: 245 2. 30% OF ALL TREES WILL BE EVERGREEN. PROPOSED TREE QUANTITY: 903 REQUIRED EVERGREEN TREES: 271 EVERGREEN TREES PROVIDED: 382 3. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL TREES WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE. 4. PRE-EMERGENT WILL BE PROVIDED IN ALL NON-SEEDED AREAS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 5. ALL TREES WILL MAINTAIN A 10' MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM LIGHT POLES AND 6' FROM UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. TREE LOCATIONS WILL BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PREPARATION WHEN ALL UTILITIES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED. 6. WATER QUALITY BASINS WILL GENERALLY BE IRRIGATED WITH ROTOR HEADS. SHRUB & TREE PLACEMENT WILL BE COORDINATED TO PREVENT OBSTRUCTION OF THE SPRAY PATTERNS. 7. PLANT HEIGHTS WILL NOT EXCEED 30" WITHIN THE LINES OF SIGHT ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND IN CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE AREAS. Turf 0.7 Overhead 0.75 0.93 14,042 13,059 420,214 51.9 Low Water Use 0.2 Overhead 0.75 0.27 597,653 161,366 5,192,445 Low Water Use 0.2 Drip 0.81 0.25 199,997 49,999 1,608,876 811,692 224,424 7,221,535 11,753,381 224,424 811,692 0.276 NORTH SCALE 1 INCH = 80 FEET FULL SITE PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA-1

PROJECT SUNRISE FACILITY

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Garth Ruffner
Landscape Architect
(916)797-2576
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H. OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES (TYPICAL) 605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H. FIRE TANK PARKING LOT SHADING: F = FULL TQ= THREE QUARTER H= HALF Q= QUARTER NOTE: RED STIPPLED AREAS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PARKING LOT SHADING CALCULATION 25' 18' 7' 8' 24' 24' 26' SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA (SEE PLANT PALETTE, SHEET LA-1) WATER QUALITY BASIN (SEE PLANTS MARKED "*" IN THE PLANT PALETTE, SHEET LA-1) TURF AREA, RECREATIONAL EDGING, STEEL (BLACK, 4" DEPTH) CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE AT DRIVEWAYS ULMUS PROPINQUA'EMERALD SUNSHINE'/HYBRID ELM SOPHORA JAPONICA/JAPANESE PAGODA TREE SCHINUS MOLLE/CALIF. PEPPER QUERCUS WISLIZENII/INTERIOR LIVE OAK QUERCUS LOBATA/VALLEY OAK PISTACIA CHINENSIS/CHINESE PISTACHE PARKINSONIA X. 'DESERT MUSEUM'/PALO VERDE LAURUS NOBILIS "SARATOGA"/GRECIAN LAUREL ERYTHRINA CRISTA-GALLI/COCKSPUR CORAL TREE CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS/WESTERN REDBUD CEDRUS DEODARA/DEODAR CEDAR ACER TRUNCATUM/SHANTUNG MAPLE ACACIA ANEURA/MULGA NORTH SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET NORTH PARKING PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA-2

PROJECT SUNRISE FACILITY

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Garth Ruffner
Landscape Architect
(916)797-2576
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

605' LINE OF SIGHT - 50 M.P.H. PARKING LOT SHADING: F = FULL TQ= THREE QUARTER H= HALF Q= QUARTER NOTE: RED STIPPLED AREAS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PARKING LOT SHADING CALCULATION 24' 24' 7' 26' 8' SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREA (SEE PLANT PALETTE, SHEET LA-1) WATER QUALITY BASIN (SEE PLANTS MARKED "*" IN THE PLANT PALETTE, SHEET LA-1) TURF AREA, RECREATIONAL EDGING, STEEL (BLACK, 4" DEPTH) CLEAR VISION TRIANGLE AT DRIVEWAYS ULMUS PROPINQUA'EMERALD SUNSHINE'/HYBRID ELM SOPHORA JAPONICA/JAPANESE PAGODA TREE SCHINUS MOLLE/CALIF. PEPPER QUERCUS WISLIZENII/INTERIOR LIVE OAK QUERCUS LOBATA/VALLEY OAK PISTACIA CHINENSIS/CHINESE PISTACHE PARKINSONIA X. 'DESERT MUSEUM'/PALO VERDE LAURUS NOBILIS "SARATOGA"/GRECIAN LAUREL ERYTHRINA CRISTA-GALLI/COCKSPUR CORAL TREE CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS/WESTERN REDBUD CEDRUS DEODARA/DEODAR CEDAR ACER TRUNCATUM/SHANTUNG MAPLE ACACIA ANEURA/MULGA NORTH SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET LA-3 SOUTH PARKING PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN

PROJECT SUNRISE FACILITY

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Garth Ruffner
Landscape Architect
(916)797-2576
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

1 0.11
2 1.12
3344556677889910
10 11
11 12
12 13
13 14
14 15
15 16
16 17
17 18
18 19
19 20
20 AA
AA
A.1
B
BC
C
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
JJK
KL
LM
M
B.1
L.6
C.1
D.1
D.6
F.4
G.2
H.1
H.9
J.8
K.8
J.3 J.3 570' - 0" 50' - 0" 60' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 50' - 0" 10' - 0" 50' - 0" 1020' - 0" 92' - 2"
10' - 0" 50' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 60' - 0" 39' - 9" 52' - 5" A2.13
4D
A2.10
1A
A2.12
5B
A2.11
5C
A2.01
4A
A2.03
4A
B.15
L.55
A2.09
5A
A2.14
3A
A4.07
5A
A4.06
3A
A4.05
1A
A4.08 1A
2A
A5.1
2A
A5.1
570' - 0"
25' - 2" 478' - 4" 66' - 6"

MATCHLINE - AREA MATCHLINE - AREA
EF

MATCHLINE - AREA MATCHLINE - AREA
BC

MATCHLINE - AREA A

MATCHLINE - AREA D

MATCHLINE - AREA C

MATCHLINE - AREA F

MATCHLINE - AREA BMATCHLINE - AREA A

MATCHLINE - AREA EMATCHLINE - AREA D
1B A4.02
A4.12
1A
A4.06
1A
A4.07
1A
A5.1
1A
A5.1
3A
A5.1
3A
A5.1
4A
A5.1
4A
A5.1
B.12

19.9 19.9
L.58

GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL NOTES
1t

1. ALL INTERIOR CMU WALLS SHALL BE 8 INCHES NOMINAL
THICKNESS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

2. WALL TYPES SHALL BE DESIGNATED ON FLOOR PLANS THUS:

SEE SHEET A8.1 FOR WALL TYPES.

3. ALL MASONRY WALLS AND INTERIOR STUD WALLS SHALL

EXTEND TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR OR ROOF DECK ABOVE
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

4. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE AT ALL FULL HEIGHT NONBEARING WALLS FOR 2-INCH VERTICAL MOVEMENT OF THE

BUILDING STRUCTURE WITHOUT TRANSFER OF COMPRESSIVE
LOADS TO WALL. FILL IRREGULARITIES BETWEEN TOP OF WALL

AND DECK ABOVE WITH MINERAL WOOL INSULATION OR FIRE

STOPPING MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MEET FIRE RATING OF
RESPECTIVE WALLS.

5. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BRACING OF NON-LOAD
BEARING MASONRY WALLS.

6. FURNISH AND INSTALL FIRE-TREATED WOOD BLOCKING OR

METAL BACKING PLATE IN METAL STUD PARTITIONS FOR THE
PROPER ANCHORAGE OF ALL WALL ATTACHED ITEMS; I.E.

TOILET ACCESSORIES, CASEWORK, MILLWORK, WALLMOUNTED FIXTURES, MARKER BOARDS, TACK BOARDS, DOOR

STOPS, AUDIO VISUAL BRACKETS, AND OTHER WALL ATTACHED
ITEMS.

7. GYPSUM BOARD SURFACES SHALL BE ISOLATED WITH

CONTROL JOINTS WHERE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS AND AS
DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.

8. MASONRY CONTROL JOINTS (CJ) AND CONTROL JOINTS ABOVE (CJA) SHALL BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND

BUILDING ELEVATIONS, AND WHERE LARGE PLUMBING VENTS

OR RISERS OCCUR IN SINGLE WYTHE MASONRY WALLS, AND

WHERE MASONRY WALLS BEARING ON THE CONCRETE FLOOR

SLAB ABUT MASONRY WALLS BEARING ON CONCRETE
FOOTINGS OR AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.

9. "MBD" AND "TBD" INDICATE MARKER BOARDS AND TACK
BOARDS ON PLANS. THE LENGTH PRECEDES THE
DESIGNATION (EXAMPLE 16' MBD). ALL BOARDS ARE 4'-0" TALL.

SEE WALL ELEVATIONS OR SPECIFICATIONS FOR MOUNTING
HEIGHT.

10. EXTEND FURRING CHANNELS AND GYPSUM BOARD UP 6
INCHES ABOVE FINISHED CEILING ON CMU WALLS.

11. SCRIBE GYPSUM WALL BOARD OF WALLS AND PARTITIONS TO IRREGULARITIES OF DECK ABOVE. SEAL TIGHTLY AROUND ALL
PENETRATIONS.
© DLR Group

REVISIONS

KEY PLAN
A B D
C
E
F
2/8/2022 10:31:45 AM
75-21908-00

12.02.2021 PROJECT SUNRISE

CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS

OVERALL FIRST

FLOOR PLAN
A1.1 PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
TRUE
N
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"
OVERALL FLOOR PLAN, LEVEL 1
ADD#001 02.08.2022
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
ADD#001
C-27769 EXP. 5-31-23Attachment A12 to Addendum ADD#001 dated February 8, 2022 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7 Exhibit A to the Resolution

SCALE: 1” = 40’-0”
08-25-2021

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA

PROJECT SUNRISE
P2
P3
P1
P6
P1
P2
P3 P1
P6
P1
P3
P2
P1
P1 P6
P1
P2
P3
P6
P1

SF MP G

REFER TO MATERIALS BOARD

FOR MATERIALS,

MANUFACTURERS & COLORS CURTAINWALL
- SF FINISH

CONCRETE

PANEL WITH

FORMLINER

CONCRETE

PANEL WITH

FORMLINER

CURTAINWALL
- SF FINISH

CONCRETE

PANEL WITH

FORMLINER SF CURTAINWALL
- SF FINISH

CONCRETE

PANEL WITH
FORMLINER GRADE AT DOCK 96' - 0" GRADE AT DOCK 96' - 0"

PEDESTRIAN
DOOR - TYP.

OVERHEAD

DOOR WITH
SEAL - TYP.

PEDESTRIAN
DOOR - TYP.

OVERHEAD

DOOR WITH
SEAL - TYP.

PEDESTRIAN
DOOR - TYP.

OVERHEAD

DOOR WITH
SEAL - TYP.

MAIN
ENTRY

RECRUITMENT
ENTRY

SCUPPER WITH
DOWNSPOUT - TYP.

SCUPPER WITH
DOWNSPOUT - TYP.

OVERHEAD

DOOR WITH
SEAL - TYP.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7 Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7
Exhibit A to the Resolution

08-25-2021

MATERIAL BOARD
P1
G
SF
MP
P2 P3 P6
PAINT
P1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW #7646 ‘FIRST STAR’
P2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW #7016 ‘MINDFUL GRAY’
P3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW #7017 ‘DORIAN GRAY’
P6 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW PANTONE COLOR #2995C
G SOLARBAN 60

SOLARGRAY

GLAZING

SF KAWNEER

ALUMINUM - DARK BRONZE

STOREFRONT
MP ALPOLIC 4MM WET SYSTEM
COLOR TO MATCH P6

COMPOSITE METAL PANEL

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA

PROJECT SUNRISE
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 7 Exhibit A to the Resolution

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 1 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
General Conditions

1. The approved entitlement is for a Major Design
Reivew for a +/- 629,186 sq. ft. single story
warehouse distribution facility with 132 dock doors,
(RDO Parcel 71, APN: 072-0370-106), as described in
the City Council Staff Report dated March 21, 2022
and Project Plans (Exhibit A) with the conditions
herein, for project number PLND-0821-0003.

On-Going Planning

2. The term of the Major Design Review approval is the
later of (i) the date of the Develoment Agreement (DA)
expires or (ii) the date three years from the date of
City Council approval of the Major Design Review
(unless extended).

Three years,
commencing with the
date of approval or
under the terms of the
DA.

Planning

3. This project shall also comply with the Rio Del Oro
Specific Plan standards, including the conditions of
approval and all applicable reports from the Tier II
approval DD8403 outlined in:
 Resolution 106-2016 (Addendum references
the MMRP),
 Resolution 107-2006 (Affordable Housing and
Financing Plans, Infrastructure Phasing, and
Large Lot TSM)
Ordinance 10-2016 (Development Agreements)
On-Going Planning

4. The development approved by this action is subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) adopted by City Council per Resolution 106-
2016 and shall comply with all applicable measures.

On-Going Planning

5. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, officers, agents, employees, and
representatives from liability for any award, damages,
costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to
any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation
related to approval of this permit. Applicant further
On-Going Planning

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 2 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such
action.

6. Any future alteration to the buildings, change in
use, intensification of the site, or modification to
the parking and landscaped area must be
reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with
all local, state, and federal regulations. Minor
modifications that are found to be in substantial
conformance with the approved plans such as
colors, plant materials, or minor lot line
adjustments, may be approved administratively.

Major modifications shall be approved by the
applicable decision making body.

On-Going Planning/
Building /Public Works

7. Applicant/Developer shall not carry a negative account balance with the City for the processing of the project.

If a negative account balance occurs, it will be the
developer's responsibility to pay the balance due, in
order to avoid delays in the processing of future
permits or recordation of maps. Please email the
Finance Department at
[email protected] for the status of
your account with the City.

On-Going Finance

8. Left turn access to/from the site and International
Drive shall only be allowed until such time that
International Drive connects to Sunrise Boulevard.

When International Drive connects to Sunrise
Boulevard, a median or other physical barrier will be
constructed eliminating left turn access to/from
International. Right turn access to/from International
will be maintained.

Ongoing. Public Works

9. Trucks and other non-passenger vehicles with
destinations beginning, ending, or including this site
shall not be permitted to drive on:
 Luyung Drive north of Gold Dredge.

Ongoing. Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 3 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
Fitzgerald Road north of Gold Dredge.

10. Applicant shall be responsible for all damage to City streets associated with construction of the project and shall repair any damage as soon as possible.

On-Going Public Works

11. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition, paving and/or grading of any
real property must adhere to the development
standards outlined within the City’s Noise Element and
RCMC 6.68.

On-Going Planning

12. Signage is not approved with this permit. All signage shall comply with the City of Rancho Cordova Zoning
Code.

On-Going Planning

13. Project shall comply with the Rio Del Ordo Air Quality Management Plan.

On-Going Planning/SMAQMD

14. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its
easements on or adjacent to the subject property that
it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for
any damages to the developed property with said
easement that unreasonably interferes with those
needs.

On-Going SMUD

15. The Applicant shall disclose existing or proposed 69 kV electrical facilities to future and/or potential owners.

On-Going SMUD
Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans

16. Stormwater Quality- Post Construction
The improvement plans shall incorporate all applicable
post construction stormwater quality measures;
including source control (loading docks, waste
management areas), treatment control,
hydromodification management, low impact
development, and full capture trash control measures
into the site improvement plans in conformance with
the most recent version of the Stormwater Quality
Design Manual for the Sacramento Region. The
applicant shall prepare and submit a PostConstruction Stormwater Quality Control Plan that Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 4 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
includes details and sizing calculations of all the
proposed post construction stormwater quality
measures. In addition, a maintenance covenant is
required for all proposed post construction stormwater
quality measures, as detailed in Appendix B of the
Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the
Sacramento Region.

17. Stormwater Quality– During Construction:

SWPPP – the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be executed
through all phases of grading and project construction.

The SWPPP shall incorporate Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to ensure that potential water quality impacts during construction phases are minimized.

These measures shall be consistent with the City’s
Improvement Standards and Land Grading and
Erosion Control Ordinance. During construction, the
applicant shall implement BMPs in accordance with
the SWPPP and the City’s Improvement Standards.

Advisory Condition: Construction General Permit
The project applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General
Permit For Storm Water Discharges Associated With
Construction And Land Disturbance Activities
(Construction General Permit). Permits are issued by
the State Water Resources Control Board.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

18. The SWPPP for the site shall include a contingency
plan for the implementation of a process to remove
fine clay sediments prior to discharge to the City of
Rancho Cordova’s storm drain system and/or Waters
of the State (e.g., creeks, rivers) to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cordova. A polymer treatment
system or comparable process shall be incorporated
in the erosion and sediment control plan as part of the Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 5 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
improvement plans submittal. This system shall be
implemented by qualified professionals with training
and proven experience in this field.

19. Drainage System Design:

The applicant shall submit and obtain City approval of
plans and specifications for the construction of public improvements and all grading. The drainage system
shall be designed in accordance with the approved
Drainage Study to accommodate runoff from the
ultimate development and shall meet the City of
Rancho Cordova’s Improvement Standards,
construction standards, and Floodplain Management
Ordinances in effect at the time of improvement plans
approval.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

20. All development within the City must comply with the City of Rancho Cordova’s Floodplain Management
Ordinance. All new structures shall be protected from
the 100-year (1 percent) flood event. Certified pad
elevations (certified by a registered Civil Engineer or licensed Land Surveyor) shall be set at least one and
two tenths foot (1.2') above all sources of 100-year
flooding (see Section 9-1 of improvement standards).

The overland release path must be shown on the
improvement plans and the hydraulic computation
must be provided to estimate the flow depths along
the overland release paths. The calculations must be
in conformance with Section 9-15 of the Improvement
Standards.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

21. Provide a permanent concrete stamp, or other
permanently applied message to the satisfaction of
the City not including paint, which reads “No DumpingFlows to Creek” or other approved message at each storm drain inlet.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 6 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)

22. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as
“private” in the improvement plans.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

23. All stormwater basins shall be designed with a natural aesthetic appearance that blends into the surrounding
landscape and development..

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works and
Planning

24. Pay the drainage impact fees to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cordova’s Public Works Department.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

25. Number, size, and location of driveways are subject to approval by the Public Works Department
Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

26. Applicant shall photo-document the condition of
adjacent streets, sidewalks and infrastructure to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

27. Enter into a frontage agreement and bond for
construction of public improvements per the approved
Public Works plans to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Department.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

28. A final landscape plan shall be submitted in
conjunction with improvement plan and or building
permit submittal and approved by the planning and
public works departments prior to issuance of permits
and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC

23.716.020. The final landscape planting and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered licensed
landscape architect nd include the following items per
RCMC 22.180.060:
 Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
 Irrigation Plan
 Soils Test
 Water Use Calculations
Irrigation Schedule
Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

29. All landscape strips, medians, etc that contain trees shall be designed to include continuous root barriers
and appropriately sized for their proposed planters.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 7 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
Tree species shall be pre-approved by the Public
Works Department.

30. Protected trees shall be replaced or mitigated per
Rancho Cordova Municipal Code 19.12.120. Tree
replacement is one inch per one inch ratio. In-lieu
payment is $165 per inch.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Public Works

31. All landscape corridor walls shall be designed of
masonry construction using graffiti resistant materials.

Wall design and materials shall be subject to City’s
approval.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works and
Planning

32. Show the design for a fire access roadway of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width, 13-feet, 6-inches
of vertical clearance, and turning radii of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside dimension on the improvement
plans. The access roadway shall extend to within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any proposed building. The use of turf-block or
grass-crete or similar alternate road surfaces is not
approved for installation in fire apparatus access
roadways.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

33. Show the design for a minimum of 2 remote fire
access roadways. Remote fire access roadways shall
be spaced a distance apart that is no less than ½ the
diagonal measurement of the overall project site.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

34. Show the design for aerial apparatus access. Aerial apparatus access shall conform to Sacramento Metro
Fire Districts, Fire Prevention Standard #3.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

35. Show the design for an approved fire apparatus
turnaround. The fire apparatus turnaround shall
conform to Sacramento Metro Fire Districts, Fire
Prevention Standard #3. The fire access turn-around
shall be located within 50 feet of the end of the access roadway.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

36. Show on the plan how Fire Lanes will be marked. Fire Lane identification shall be provided along the
Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 8 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
required fire access roadway. Fire Lane identification
shall be in accordance with the Sacramento Metro
Fire Districts Fire Prevention Standard #3 and the
California Vehicle Code. Vehicle parking is prohibited
on any street less than 28 feet in width. Vehicle
parking is permitted on both sides of streets 36 feet or more in width. Roadway widths shall be measured
between the gutter-line or edge of pavement on
opposite sides of the road. Identification of fire
apparatus access roadways may be required on
private roads.

37. Provide a note on the plan that reads, “Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to
support the imposed live load of 80,000 pounds, with
a maximum axle load of 31,000 pounds, and meet
Public Works Standards for roadways. A report,
prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer,
verifying the ability of the road to bear the required
minimum weight, shall be submitted with any plan
indicating construction of roadway. Verification of
constructed roadway shall be provided by a registered
geotechnical engineer prior to final of the project.”
Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

38. Show the location of the required fire hydrants for this project on the improvement plans. Approved fire
hydrants capable of providing the required fire flow for the protection of any and all structures shall be
located along the fire apparatus access roadway. The
required fire hydrants shall be installed and
operational prior to any construction or on-site storage of combustible materials. The minimum required fire
flow for the protection of commercial developments is
1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) at a pressure of 20
pounds per square inch (psi) for a two-hour duration.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

Sacramento Metro Fire
District

39. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SMUD

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 9 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of ways

40. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum
SMUD requirements for access roads.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SMUD

41. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20- feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and
appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface
Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SMUD

42. The Applicant shall dedicate a 20-foot easement for future 69 kV routes that will be required to connect the new
substation into SMUD’s Distribution System. Associated
future overhead 69kV will be installed along both sides of International Drive, then continues west and crosses their property and then heads west along the proposed Gold
Dredge Way. If a 12.5-foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) is also required along these streets, the 12.5-foot PUE will be located directly adjacent to the street right-of-way, with the 20-foot 69 kV easement directly adjacent to the PUE.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SMUD

43. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to
the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate
with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for
the cost of relocation or removal.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
SMUD

44. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD
easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD
performing work on the Applicant’s property
Prior to approval of
improvement plans
SMUD

45. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting
requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances
from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service
conductors). Information regarding SMUD siting
requirements can be found at:
https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-andPrior to approval of improvement plans
SMUD

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 10 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
Rebates/Design-and-Construction-Services

46. 47. To obtain sewer service, construction of SASD sewer infrastructure will be required. Current SASD Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SASD

48. SASD requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SASD’s sewer
system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line or a separate connection to the SASD public sewer line. These improvements must be
shown on the plans.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SASD

49. Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured
horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SASD

50. The project has an approved Level 3 sewer study. Any changes to the approved study may require an addendum.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans.

SASD
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

51. Applicant shall complete improvement plans to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Improvement plans shall include, but shall not be
limited to:
 All frontage, utility and arterial road improvements
necessary for access to the site including Rancho
Cordova Parkway, International, and Gold Dredge
and as identified on the phasing plan.
 Pavement improvements including existing Gold
Dredge Way, Luyung south of Gold Dredge, and
Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 11 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
Mechanical west of Luyung as depicted in the
phasing plan.
 All onsite civil improvements.
 Frontage improvements including sidewalk,
driveways and landscaping shall conform with the
Rio Del Oro Specific Plan. Sidewalks on Rancho
Cordova Parkway and International shall be
minimum 8-feet wide separated minimum 6-feet
from the back of curb. Sidewalks on Road Gold
Dredge shall be minimum 7-feet wide and may be
attached or detached.
 Driveways shall be designed and constructed per
Sacramento County Standard Drawing 4-35, Type
A driveway.
 Civil plan shall include an ADA access plan
 The drainage system shall be designed in
accordance with the approved Drainage Study to
accommodate runoff from the ultimate
development and shall meet the City of Rancho
Cordova’s Improvement Standards, construction
standards, and Floodplain Management
Ordinances in effect at the time of improvement
plans approval.
 Utility laterals.
 Provide street lighting as required by the City of
Rancho Cordova Code. Street Lighting shall
conform to all City improvement standards, and
necessary easements shall be granted to
accommodate those standards.
 Other improvements per the approved phasing
plan or as needed for adequate function and
connection to the development.
 All improvements to be designed and
constructed to the satisfaction of the
Public Works Department.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 12 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)

52. Provide Fire Access Agreement between all parcels
connected to and served by fire access. Fire Access
Agreement shall be recorded with the Public
Recorders Office having jurisdiction.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento Metro Fire
District

53. Provide Fire Access Roadway Maintenance
Agreement (RMA) between all parcels connected to
and served by the fire access roadway. The Fire
Access Roadway Maintenance Agreement shall be
recorded with the Public Recorders Office having
jurisdiction. The roadway maintenance agreement
shall include the following:
a) Provisions for the necessary repair and
maintenance of the roadway surface
b) Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway
and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of
thirteen feet six inches (13’ 6”) or width of twenty feet (20’)
c) Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or
replacement of NO PARKINGFIRE LANE signage or
striping
d) Provisions for the necessary repair and
maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates
and opening systems
Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento Metro Fire
District

54. The applicant shall meet the following: Civil Site Plans and Architectural Plans shall be submitted and approvedprior to Final Building Permit being issued. Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm plans shall be submitted prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Please note: The Sacramento Metro Fire
District does not allow deferred submittals for Fire Sprinkler or Fire Alarm plans.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento Metro Fire
District

55. Where a bridge or elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be
constructed and maintained in accordance with
AASHTO HB-17.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento Metro Fire
District

56. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the Prior to Issuance of SMUD

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 13 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
Applicant to conduct a pre-engineering meeting with
all utilities to ensure property clearances are
maintained.

Building Permit

57. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the project developer/owner shall pay Zone 40
development fees applicable at the time of building
permit issuance in accordance with Title 4 of the
Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) Code.

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SCWA

58. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the project shall conform to the specific provisions of the City of Rancho Cordova Landscaping Ordinance (Municipal Code Title 23, Chapter 23.716).

Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SCWA

59. The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at
[email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-
6100 to determine if sewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SASD
Prior to Final Inspection

60. During and upon completion of the installation of the landscaping for the project, the project landscape
architect/designer shall certify that the installed
landscape complies with the approved plans.

Certification shall be accomplished by completion of
site visits at key installation milestones. Key
milestones at a minimum shall include: rough grade,
soil amendment verification, Plant material inspection, irrigation coverage test and final installation.

Certification shall include signed site observation
reports, photographs and documentation verifying
implementation of soil report recommendations.

Failure to submit complete and accurate
documentation to the Planning Department will delay
final approval/occupancy of the project.

Prior to final building
inspection of the first
unit
Public Works

61. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping, the designer shall certify that the landscape complies
Prior to final Building
Inspection
Public Works

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 14 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (date
and Signature)
with all city water conserving landscape requirements.

Certification shall be accomplished by completion of a
certificate of compliance on a form approved by the
director of the city public works department. Failure to submit a complete and accurate certificate of
compliance will delay final approval of the project
and/or discontinue water service per RCMC

22.180.090. Upon receipt of the certificate of
compliance and site inspection from City staff, the
landscaping performance bond will be released.

62. Install public and onsite improvements per the
approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of
the Public Works Department.

Prior to final building
inspection of the first
unit
Public Works

63. As-built reproducible grading and improvement plans (1 full size and 1 half size hard copy), as well as a
compact disc containing said plans in AutoCAD and
pdf format, and a GIS shape file, or equivalent to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be submitted
and approved by the Public Works Department.

Prior to final building
inspection
Public Works

64. In addition to the conditions of approval, the mitigation monitoring and reporting program must be completed
in accordance with their implementation timing prior to final inspection. This is to satisfy the requirements of the project’s CEQA review.

Prior to Final
Inspection/ Certificate
of Occupancy
Planning

65. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new or existing buildings in such a position as to be
easily read from the street or road fronting the
property. The minimum size of the numbers shall not
be less than six (6) inches and shall be mounted
immediately adjacent to a light source and shall also
contrast with their background.

Prior to Final
Inspection/ Certificate
of Occupancy
Sacramento Metro Fire
District

ADVISORY

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 8
Project Sunrise Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council –DRAFT Page 15 of 15 Project Sunrise
March 21, 2022 Major Design Review
Planning
Graffiti resistant paint shall be provided on all exterior surfaces, to allow for efficient cleaning of any graffiti on the structure.

Sacramento County Water Agency
 Water supply will be provided by the Sacramento County Water Agency.  Provide public water service to each building.
 All water lines shall be located within a public right-of-way or within easements dedicated to SCWA. Easements shall be reviewed and approved by Sacramento County Water Agency prior to Improvement Plan approval or Final Map approval.  Destroy all abandoned wells on the proposed project site in accordance with the requirements of the Sacramento County Environmental Health Division. Clearly show all abandoned/destroyed wells on the improvement plans for the project. Prior to abandoning any existing agricultural wells, applicant shall use water from agricultural wells for grading and construction.  No water supply mains shall be located under structures such as box culverts and bridges. If the project will build box culverts and bridges to the ultimate width, water mains shall cross above ground attached to the side of the structure.

Structures shall be designed accordingly. If the ultimate width is not being built, water mains shall cross underground routed outside of and around the ultimate structure footprint. 15-foot wide water main easements shall be dedicated for the portion outside of ROW. The crossing shall be be approved by the Agency Engineer. Underground crossings and attachments to structures shall be included in the environmental impact analysis. Additional environmental permitting and other associated costs will be at applicant’s expense.

SASD
 ONGOING: SASD Design Standards and Specifications require minimum 6-inch lower laterals for commercial and industrial buildings.
 ONGOING: Construction of a grease trap or a sand oil separator may be required. The applicant must verify with the applicable jurisdiction’s building department.
 ONGOING: SASD prohibits gates that prevent access within sewer easements unless the District standards for accessibility through gates are met.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

RIO DEL ORO SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement

3.4 DRAINAGE, HYDROLOGY, AND WATER QUALITY

3.4-1: Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements. Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) for all project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City demonstrating that off-site upstream runoff would be appropriately conveyed through the project site, and that project-related on-site runoff would be appropriately contained in detention basins to reduce flooding impacts. Furthermore, the project applicant(s) for all project phases may be required to participate in drainage improvements along Sunrise Boulevard; this will be determined through continuing consultation with the Sacramento County Department of Water Resources.

Before approval of grading
plans and building permits
for all project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department.

3.4-3: Implement Measures or Best Management Practices to Reduce Water Quality Effects of Temporary Construction Activities. Before the approval of grading permits and improvement plans project applicant(s) for all project phases shall consult with the City, the SWRCB, and the Central Valley RWQCB to acquire the appropriate regulatory approvals that may be necessary to obtain Section 401 water quality certification, an SWRCB statewide NPDES stormwater permit for general construction activity, and any other necessary site-specific WDRs or waivers under the Porter-Cologne Act. The project applicant(s) shall prepare and submit the appropriate NOIs and prepare the SWPPP and any other necessary engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control. The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identify and specify:
► the use of erosion and sediment–control BMPs, including construction techniques that will reduce the potential for runoff and other measures to be implemented during construction; ► the means of waste disposal;
► the implementation of approved local plans, nonstormwater-management controls, permanent postconstruction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities; ► the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges, and other types of materials used for equipment operation;
► spill prevention and contingency measures, including measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
► personnel training requirements and procedures that will be used to ensure that workers are Before approval of grading
permits and improvement
plans and throughout all site
work and construction for all
project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department,
SWRCB, and Central Valley
RWQCB.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP; and
► the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP.

Where applicable BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and construction and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include such measures as the following:
► Implementing temporary erosion-control measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of sediment into nearby drainage conveyances. These measures may include silt fences, staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation.
► Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoff velocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and transpiration. ► Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoff by conveying surface runoff down sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoff to a watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and facility infrastructure.

All construction contractors shall retain a copy of the approved SWPPP on the construction site.

3.5 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

3.5-2 (2008 RDEIR/SDEIS): Submit Proof of Water Supply Availability. The following shall be required for all legislative-level development projects, including community plans, general plan amendments, specific plans, rezonings, and other plan-level discretionary entitlements, but excluding tentative subdivision maps, parcel maps, use permits, and other project-specific discretionary land-use entitlements or approvals:
► Proposed water supplies and delivery systems shall be identified at the time of development Before the approval of
project-specific
discretionary land-use
entitlements and approvals
(subsequent to the approval
of the specific plan),
including all final small-lot
maps; or for nonresidential
City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
project approval to the satisfaction of the City. The water agency or company proposing to provide service (collectively referred to as “water provider”) to the project may provide several alternative methods of supply and/or delivery, provided that each is capable individually of providing water to the project. The project applicant or water provider shall make a factual showing prior to project approval that the water provider or providers proposing to serve the development project has or have legal entitlements to the identified water supplies or that such entitlements are reasonably foreseeable by the time of subsequent, project-specific discretionary land-use entitlements or approvals. This factual showing shall also demonstrate that the water provider’s identified water supply is reasonably reliable over the long term (at least 20 years) under normal, single-dry and multiple-dry years.

The following shall be required for project-specific discretionary land-use entitlements and approvals including, but not limited to, all tentative subdivision maps, parcel maps, or use permits:
► An assured water supply and delivery system shall be available or reasonably foreseeable at the time of project approval. The water agency providing service to the project may provide several alternative methods of supply and/or delivery, provided that each is capable individually of providing water to the project.
► The project applicant, water agency (or agencies), or water company (or companies) providing water service to the project site shall make a factual showing consistent with, or the City shall impose conditions similar to, those required by Government Code Section 66473.7 in order to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the project. Prior to recordation of any final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar projectspecific discretionary land use approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant or water provider shall demonstrate the availability of a long-term, reliable water supply for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. This assurance of water supply shall identify that the water provider has legal entitlement to the water source and that the water source is reasonably reliable (at least 20 years) under normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Such demonstration shall consist of a written certification from the water provider that either existing sources are available or that needed improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.
projects, before issuance of
use permits, building
permits, or other
entitlements.

3.5-3 (2008 RDEIR/SDEIS): Submit Proof of an Off-Site and On-Site Infrastructure Delivery System or Assure that Adequate Financing is Secured.

Before the approval of
project-specific,
discretionary land-use
City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
The following shall be required for all legislative-level development projects, including community plans, general plan amendments, specific plans, rezonings, and other plan-level discretionary entitlements, but excluding tentative subdivisions maps, parcel maps, use permits, and other project-specific discretionary land-use entitlements or approvals:
► All required water treatment and delivery infrastructure for the project shall be in place at the time of subsequent, project-specific discretionary land-use entitlements or approvals, or shall be assured prior to occupancy through the use of bonds or other sureties to the City’s satisfaction. Water infrastructure may be phased to coincide with the phased development of large-scale projects.

The following shall be required for project-specific discretionary land-use entitlements and approvals including, but not limited to, all tentative subdivision maps, parcel maps, or use permits:
► Off-site and on-site water infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate water to the subdivision shall be in place prior to the issuance of building permits or their financing shall be assured to the satisfaction of the City prior to the approval of the Final Map, consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, or prior to the issuance of a similar, project-level entitlement for nonresidential land uses.
► Off-site and on-site water distribution systems required to serve the subdivision shall be in place and contain water at sufficient quantity and pressure prior to the issuance of any building permits. Model homes may be exempted from this policy as determined appropriate by the City, and subject to approval by the City.
entitlements and approvals
(subsequent to the approval
of the specific plan),
including all final small-lot
maps, or for nonresidential
projects, before the issuance
of use permits, building
permits, or other
entitlements.

3.5-4 (2008 RDEIR/SDEIS): Implement the same mitigation measures called for in the 2006 DEIR/DEIS and in the Recirculated DEIR/Supplemental DEIS, as specifically set forth in Table ES-1.

Implement the same
mitigation measures called
for in the 2006 DEIR/DEIS
and in the Recirculated
DEIR/Supplemental DEIS,
as specifically set forth in
Table ES-1, and modified by
the MMRP and Findings of
Fact.

City of Rancho Cordova
Building Department

3.5-4 (2006 DEIR/DEIS): Submit Proof of Adequate Wastewater and Implement On- and Off-Site Infrastructure Service or Assure that Adequate Financing is Secured. Before the Before approval of small-lot
final maps and building
City of Rancho Cordova
Building Department

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
approval of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) shall submit proof to the City that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is assured through the use of bonds or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on- and off-site wastewater conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to Rio del Oro subdivisions shall be in place before the approval of the final map, or their financing shall be assured to the satisfaction of the City.
permits for all project
phases.

3.5-6: Demonstrate Adequate Wastewater Treatment Capacity. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map–level study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD and CSD-1. Approval of the final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity.

Before approval of building
permits for all project
phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Building and Safety, and
Public Works Departments.

3.6 PUBLIC SERVICES

3.6-1: Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plans. The project applicant(s) and/or project contractor(s) for all project phases shall prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic control plans must follow standards of the agency responsible for the affected roadway and must be signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising of planned lane closures, warning signage, a flagperson to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by emergency vehicles. During project construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department for review and approval before the approval of all project plans or permits for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

Before approval of grading,
improvement, or
construction plans and
permits and during
construction for all project
phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department.

3.6-2: Incorporate California Fire Code and SMFD Fire Prevention Standards into Project Design and Submit Project Design to SMFD for Review and Approval. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, SMFD Fire Prevention Standard 441.1051, and other applicable requirements based on SMFD fire prevention standards. Approved plans showing access design shall be provided to SMFD as described by Fire Prevention Standard 444.302 (“Fire Apparatus Access Roads”). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment.

Before approval of
improvement plans and
issuance of occupancy
permits or final inspections
for all project phases.

Sacramento Metropolitan
Fire District and City of
Rancho Cordova Building
and Safety Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
Improvement plans showing hydrant locations shall be submitted to the SMFD Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. Fire hydrant details and SMFD notes shall be shown on the plans or improvement drawings as detailed in Fire Prevention Standard 441.1051. A letter from the Sacramento County Water Agency shall be obtained verifying that adequate water is available for fire flow.

In addition, as required by the City General Plan, new commercial and industrial development, as well as multi-family residential development with five or more units must incorporate on-site fire suppression systems into project designs.

If security gates are installed at the project site, the project applicant(s) shall obtain a copy of the County Fire Code, Amendment VII, “Emergency Access Gates and Barriers.” The design of the entry shall conform to this standard.

The City shall not authorize the occupancy of any structures until the project applicant(s) has obtained a Certificate of Release (Standard 441.105, “Certificate of Release—Residential”) from SMFD verifying that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction of SMFD.

3.7 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES

3.7-1: Prepare and Implement a Grading and Erosion Control Plan. A grading and erosion control plan shall be prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer retained by the project applicant(s) for all project phases. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Department of Public Works before the issuance of grading permits for all new development within the project site. The plan shall be consistent with the City’s Land Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance as well as the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases. The plan shall include the location, implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description of measures designed to control dust and stabilize the construction-site road and entrance, and a description of the location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing.

Stabilization of construction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source of Before the issuance of
grading permits for all
project phases, and
throughout project
construction.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works, Building and
Safety, and Planning
Departments.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
transportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.4-3 (discussed in Section 3.4, “Drainage, Hydrology, and Water Quality”) will help reduce erosion-related impacts.

3.7-3a: Prepare a Geotechnical Study and Implement All Applicable Recommendations.

Before the approval of grading plans for all project phases, a final geotechnical subsurface investigation report shall be prepared by the project applicant(s) for the proposed development and shall be submitted to the City. The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make recommendations on the following:
► site preparation;
► appropriate sources and types of fill;
► potential need for soil amendments;
► road, pavement, and parking areas;
► structural foundations, including retaining wall design; ► grading practices;
► erosion/winterization;
► special problems discovered on-site (e.g., groundwater and expansive/unstable soils); and ► slope stability.

The geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions and determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the CBC. If the soils report indicates the presence of critically expansive soils or other soil problems that would lead to structural defect if not corrected, additional investigations may be required for subdivisions before building permits are issued. This shall be so noted on the project grading plans. Recommendations contained in the geotechnical engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before the issuance of building permits. Design and construction of all new development in all phases of the proposed project shall be in accordance with the CBC and the County Land Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance. It is the responsibility of the project applicant(s) to provide for engineering inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with recommendations contained in the report.

Before approval of grading
plans for all project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department.

3.7-3b: Ensure On-Site Monitoring by a Geotechnical Engineer. All earthwork shall be monitored by a geotechnical engineer retained by the project applicant(s) for all project phases.

The geotechnical engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement of fill, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on the subject site and other sites. Before Before issuance of grading
permit and during
construction activities for all
City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
export/import of any soil to/from an off-site location, the project applicant(s) shall obtain a grading permit from the City Department of Public Works.
project phases.

3.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES

3.9-2: Record Eligible Historic Resources to Historic American Building Survey Standards and on Appropriate State Forms. If the Solid Propellant Assembly Area and the Sigma Test Area structures and their earthen berms must be demolished for project implementation, built elements of the eligible districts shall be documented by the project applicant(s) according to Historic American Building Survey (HABS) standards and recorded as cultural resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks) Series 523 Primary and Archaeological Site records, and other appropriate forms from State Parks. The project applicant(s) shall have this documentation completed before approval of demolition permits for any of the historic structures or features.

Before approval of
demolition permits for the
historic structures.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

3.9-3: Provide Preconstruction Worker Education and Stop Potentially Damaging Work if Human Remains are Uncovered during Construction. Before initiation of construction or ground-disturbing activities associated with the project, the project applicant(s) for all project phases shall require all construction personnel to be alerted to the possibility of buried cultural resources. The general contractor and its supervisory staff shall be responsible for monitoring the construction project for disturbance of cultural resources. Should any cultural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifacts, human remains, or architectural remains be encountered during any development activities, work shall be suspended and the City shall be notified immediately. The project applicant(s) shall retain a City-approved qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and recommend mitigation deemed necessary for the protection or recovery of any cultural resource concluded by the archaeologist to represent historical resources or unique archaeological resources. The City shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined by the City to be feasible in light of approved land uses. The project applicant(s) shall implement the approved mitigation before the resumption of construction activities at the construction site.

In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during construction at the project site, work within 50 feet of the remains shall be suspended immediately, and the City and the County Coroner shall be notified immediately. If the remains are determined by the County Coroner to be Native American, the NAHC shall be notified within 24 hours of that determination (Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]), and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be Before approval of grading
plans and during all grounddisturbing activities for all project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The NAHC will then assign a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to serve as the main point of Native American contact and consultation.

Following the coroner’s findings, the MLD and the archaeologist shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The project applicant(s) shall be required to implement any feasible, timely-formulated mitigation deemed necessary for the protection of the burial remains.

Construction work in the vicinity of the burials shall not resume until the mitigation is completed.

This measure shall be included in all grading and improvement plans for all project phases.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement

3.9-6: Monitor Construction in Culturally Sensitive Areas and Stop Potentially Damaging Work if Archaeological Sites or Human Remains are Uncovered during Construction.

Because areas of increased cultural sensitivity have been identified as a result of Native American contacts, the project applicant(s) of Phase 1 shall retain a City-approved qualified professional archaeologist to provide on-site monitoring during construction activities in these sensitive areas, as depicted in Exhibit 3.9-1. If the archaeologist notes unusual amounts of bone, stone, shell, burned soils, or other possible indications of buried archaeological resources, construction in the vicinity shall be halted until the find can be assessed. The archaeologist shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and shall recommend mitigation deemed necessary for the protection or recovery of any cultural resource concluded by the archaeologist to represent historical resources or unique archaeological resources. The City shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined by the City to be feasible in light of approved land uses. The project applicant(s) shall implement the approved mitigation before the resumption of construction activities at the construction site.

In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during construction at the project site, work within 50 feet of the remains shall be suspended immediately, and the City and the County Coroner shall be notified immediately. If the remains are determined by the County Coroner to be Native American, the NAHC shall be notified within 24 hours of that determination (Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]), and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The NAHC will then assign an MLD to serve as the main point of Native American contact and consultation. Following the coroner’s findings, the MLD and the archaeologist shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and shall take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The project applicant(s) of Phase 1 shall be required to implement any feasible, timelyformulated mitigation deemed necessary for the protection of the burial remains. Construction work in the vicinity of the burials shall not resume until the mitigation is completed.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.9-3 discussed above will help reduce potential impacts to cultural resources.

Before approval of grading
and improvement plans and
during all ground-disturbing
activities in the sensitive
areas of development Phase

1. City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

3.10 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

3.10-1a: Secure Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions, and Ensure No Net Loss of Wetlands, Other Waters of the United States, and Associated Functions and Values. Before the approval of grading and improvement plans and before any Before the approval of
grading or improvement
plans or any groundU.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Sacramento
District; Central Valley

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
groundbreaking activity associated with each distinct project phase, the project applicant(s) for each project phase requiring the fill of wetlands or other waters of the United States or waters of the state shall obtain all necessary permits under Sections 401 and 404 of the CWA or the State’s PorterCologne Act for the respective phase. The project applicant(s) shall commit to replace, restore, or enhance on a “no net loss” basis (in accordance with USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the Natural Resources Element of the City General Plan) the acreage of all wetlands and other waters of the United States subject to USACE jurisdiction and waters of the state subject to RWQCB jurisdiction and the City General Plan that would be removed, lost, and/or degraded with implementation of project plans for that phase. Wetland habitat shall be restored, enhanced, and/or replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the City, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes.

To accomplish this mitigation, the project applicant(s) shall take the following steps:
► As part of the Section 404 permitting process, a draft wetland MMP has been developed for the project (Appendix Q) by ECORP Consulting on behalf of the project applicant(s) (ECORP 2009). Before any ground-disturbing activities that would adversely affect wetlands and before engaging in mitigation activities associated with each phase of development, the project applicant(s) shall submit the draft wetland MMP to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the City for review and approval of those portions of the plan over which they have jurisdiction. Once the MMP is approved and implemented, mitigation monitoring will continue for a minimum of 10 years from completion of mitigation, or human intervention (including recontouring and grading), or until the performance standards identified in the approved MMP have been met, whichever is longer. Monitoring reports shall include baseline CRAM scores and the CRAM scores from all previous years shall be plotted to show the “restoration trajectory.” The plan shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City, in accordance with the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance, as well as to the satisfaction of those agencies with jurisdiction over all or portions of the plan. ► In conjunction with preparation and implementation of an approved wetland MMP, the project applicant(s) shall prepare and submit plans for the creation of jurisdictional waters of the United States, including wetlands, at an adequate mitigation ratio to offset the aquatic functions and values that would be lost at the project site, account for the temporal loss of habitat, and contain an adequate margin of safety to reflect anticipated success. The MMPs must demonstrate how the aquatic functions and values that would be lost through project implementation will be replaced. The habitat MMP for jurisdictional wetland features will disturbing activities for any
project development phase
containing wetland features.

The MMP must be approved
before any impact on
wetlands can occur.

Mitigation shall be
implemented on an ongoing
basis throughout and after
construction, as required.

Regional Water Quality
Control Board; and City of
Rancho Cordova Planning
Department, as appropriate
depending on agency
jurisdiction, and as
determined during the
Section 401 and Section 404
permitting processes and in
compliance with the City’s
Grading and Erosion Control
Ordinance.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
need to be consistent with USACE’s December 30, 2004, Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Proposal Guidelines. The wetland MMP shall also mitigate impacts on vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, and shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or mitigate any off-site project-related impacts. The wetland creation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
● target areas for creation;
● a complete biological assessment of the existing resources in the target areas, including a CRAM analysis conducted during the wet season to establish baseline conditions; ● specific creation and restoration plans for each target area; ● performance standards for success that will illustrate that the compensation ratios are met; and
● a monitoring plan, including schedule and annual report. As requested by EPA, the monitoring plan shall incorporate CRAM analysis and the following elements:
 intensive monitoring of hydrology early on (this can be phased out as created wetlands are achieving target standards);
 CRAM analysis conducted annually for 5 years after any construction adjacent to assessment areas to determine whether these areas are retaining functions and values;
 analysis of CRAM data, including assessment of potential stressors, to determine whether any remedial activities may be necessary;
 corrective measures if performance standards are not met;  monitoring of vegetation communities and targeted special-status species as success criteria for hydrologic function have become established and the creation site “matures” over time;
 reference locations for comparison to compensatory vernal pools to document success;
 adaptive management measures to be applied if performance standards are not being met;

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-15 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
 responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and  responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or corrective actions.
● An operations and management plan for the Preserve shall be prepared and submitted to USACE and USFWS for review and approval. The plan shall include detailed information on the habitats present within the target area, the long-term management and monitoring of these habitats, legal protection for the target area (e.g., conservation easement, declaration of restrictions), and funding mechanism information (e.g., endowment).
► For each phase of development, including off-site project-related impacts, the project applicant(s) shall secure the permits and regulatory approvals described below and shall implement all permit conditions. For each respective phase, all permits, regulatory approvals, and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats shall be secured before implementation of any grading activities within 250 feet of waters of the United States or wetland habitats, including waters of the state, that potentially support federally listed species. The setback may be reduced to a distance approved by the City and USFWS if a wetland avoidance plan is developed and implemented by a qualified biologist. The wetland avoidance plan must be approved by USFWS and the City and shall demonstrate that all direct and indirect impacts on wetlands will be avoided. Project phases in upland areas with no wetlands or waters of the United States within 250 feet, and no overland hydrologic flow patterns, the disturbance of which may affect such waters, may begin construction before these particular permits are obtained. Buffers around wetlands that do not support federally listed species shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the edge of these features in accordance with conditions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and associated best management practices (BMPs). See Section 3.4, “Drainage, Hydrology, and Water Quality,” of the 2006 DEIR/DEIS for a further discussion of the NPDES. ● Authorization to place dredged or fill material into waters of the United States shall be secured from USACE through the CWA Section 404 permitting process before any fill is placed in jurisdictional wetlands or other waters of the United States. USACE has determined that the project will require an individual permit. In its final stage and once approved by USACE, the proposed MMP for the project is expected to detail proposed wetland restoration, enhancement, and/or replacement activities that would ensure no net loss of aquatic functions and values in the project vicinity. Approval and implementation

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-16 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
of the wetland MMP shall fully mitigate all impacts on jurisdictional waters of the United States, including jurisdictional wetlands. In addition to USACE approval, approval by the City and the Central Valley RWQCB, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes, will also be required. To satisfy the requirements of the City and the Central Valley RWQCB, mitigation of impacts on nonjurisdictional wetlands and waters of the state beyond the jurisdiction of USACE shall be included in the same mitigation and monitoring plan.

Wetland mitigation must be approved before any impacts on waters of the United States or waters of the state commence.
● Water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA will be required before issuance of a Section 404 permit. Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the project applicant(s) shall obtain water quality certification for the applicable phase of the project. Any measures required as part of the issuance of water quality certification shall be implemented.

If Section 401 and 404 permit requirements ensure no net loss of all wetland features, including vernal pools, and these requirements are addressed before any ground-disturbing activities, no additional mitigation will be required by the City. Written approval from the City indicating that these requirements fulfill all no-net-loss obligations must be obtained before the approval of grading or improvement plans or any ground-disturbing activities in any project phase containing wetland features.

3.10-1b: Include in Drainage Plans All Wetlands that Remain On-Site. A model-based watershed analysis was conducted by ECORP Consulting (Appendix Q) to determine hydrologic effects on wetlands within the 507-acre preserve. The long-term viability of the preserve was analyzed using all of the following factors:
► the size of the preserve,
► the amount of watershed area required to support the wetlands within the preserve, ► the potential impacts from the construction of Rancho Cordova Parkway and Americanos Boulevard,
► the construction of the mitigation wetlands within the preserve, and Before approval of
improvement and drainage
plans, and on an ongoing
basis throughout and after
project construction, as
required for all project
phases.

U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Sacramento
District; and City of Rancho
Cordova Public Works and
Planning Departments.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
► the watershed area needed to support the hydrologic function of each mitigation wetland.

The proposed construction design includes measures to reduce interference with the hydrology that sustains vernal pools on-site, including the use of con-span bridge systems (Exhibits 2-7 and 2-8 in the 2006 DEIR/DEIS) as natural substrate span crossings over Morrison Creek. Rancho Cordova Parkway and Americanos Boulevard would cross Morrison Creek with a clear span of the delineated wetlands within the channel bank, so no construction would occur within the channel and no fill or modification of the channel would be required.

GIS analysis of a LiDAR-derived topographic model (Appendix Q) and wetland delineation data were used to determine the watershed-to-wetland ratio (WWR) for the wetlands within the preserve.

It was found that the proposed configuration of the preserve conserves almost 100% of the original watershed area and would not negatively affect the hydrologic function of the vernal pools. GIS analysis calculated the mean watershed ratio of existing vernal pools in the preserve at 7.14:1. This WWR would be maintained for all existing vernal pools, except that the WWR of one small pool (0.053 acre) would be reduced to 6.62:1. The adverse effect on this vernal pool should not be considered significant because pools of this size class require a WWR of only 3.26:1 to maintain functionality.

To minimize indirect effects on water quality and wetland hydrology, the project applicant(s) of each project phase shall include drainage plans in their improvement plans and shall submit the drainage plans to the City Public Works Department for review and approval. Before approval of these improvement plans, the project applicant(s) for all project phases shall commit to implement all measures in their drainage plans to avoid and minimize erosion and runoff into Morrison Creek and all wetlands that would remain on-site. Appropriate runoff controls such as berms, storm gates, detention basins, overflow collection areas, filtration systems, and sediment traps shall be implemented to control siltation and the potential discharge of pollutants. For runoff during construction, see Section 3.4, “Drainage, Hydrology, and Water Quality,” of the 2006 DEIR/DEIS for a further discussion of the NPDES (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan).

The project shall result in no net change to peak flows into Morrison Creek and associated tributaries off-site or within the preserve. The project applicant(s) shall establish a baseline of conditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow conditions shall be established for 2-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year storm events. These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the stormwater system on the project site. The baseline conditions, monitoring standards, and a monitoring program shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. The engineered channel and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-18 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
standards, which are described in Section 3.4, “Drainage, Hydrology, and Water Quality,” of the 2006 DEIR/DEIS are met. The discharge site into Morrison Creek and associated tributaries shall be monitored to ensure that preproject conditions are being met. Stormwater runoff from Rancho Cordova Parkway would be discharged out of the wetland preserve to the north and south, and runoff from the central portion of the road would drain into a water quality treatment swale before being discharged into the wetland preserve (Exhibit 3.10-4). Runoff from Americanos Boulevard would be directed into a water quality treatment basin before being discharged into Morrison Creek (Exhibit 3.10-5). The water quality swale and treatment basins would be designed according to the Stormwater and Water Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions (Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership 2007) and shall meet the performance standards described in Section 3.4, “Drainage, Hydrology, and Water Quality,” of the 2006 DEIR/DEIS. Corrective measures shall be implemented as necessary. The mitigation measures will be satisfied when the monitoring standards are met for 5 consecutive years without undertaking corrective measures to meet the performance standard.

3.10-2a: Secure and Implement Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. A Section 1602 streambed alteration agreement from DFG will be required for construction affecting the bed and bank of Morrison Creek. As a condition of issuance of the streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant(s) for all project phases shall prepare a habitat MMP. The draft wetland MMP shall address impacts on the stream channel of Morrison Creek and shall include mitigation of impacts on riparian habitats to the satisfaction of DFG, subject to limitations on its authority set forth in Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq. The MMP shall include performance standards and success criteria to ensure that mitigation habitat would be successfully maintained.

Any conditions of issuance of the streambed alteration agreement shall be implemented as part of project construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and current and historic riparian habitat associated with Morrison Creek that is within the area subject to DFG jurisdiction.

The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Morrison Creek and its associated current and historic riparian habitat.

Before the approval of
grading or improvement
plans or any construction
activities (including clearing
and grubbing) that affect the
bed and bank or current and
historic riparian habitat
associated with Morrison
Creek.

California Department of
Fish and Game.

3.10-2b: Preserve, Restore, or Create Riparian Habitat at Satisfactory Ratio to Fulfill Local Planning Framework Requirements. Goal NR.1, Policy NR 1.9 of the City General Plan calls for the protection and preservation of the diverse wildlife and plant habitats in Rancho Cordova and incorporation of “large interconnected wooded open space corridors in new development areas Before the approval of
grading or improvement
plans or any construction
activities and before removal
City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department in
consultation with California
Department of Fish and

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
to provide movement corridors, and nesting sites for migratory songbirds and raptors.” Portions of the on-site riparian habitat such as the 57 acres of cottonwood willow riparian woodland and 4 acres of willow scrub have been determined to provide important habitat for wildlife, both at present and in the long term, because of existing conditions that support the perpetuation of these habitats. To implement Goal NR.1, a habitat MMP shall be developed and implemented to replace the 57 acres of cottonwood willow riparian woodland and 4 acres of willow scrub at no-net-loss acreage to preserve the overall habitat functions and values. Elements of the habitat MMP may include habitat preservation on-site, enhancement of on-site riparian habitat types, or enhancement or protection of habitat off-site. The specific ratios of habitat lost to habitat created shall be determined by the City in consultation with DFG as a trustee agency protecting the wildlife resources of the state. The ratios shall be consistent with the City’s policy and shall be adequate to protect and preserve the diverse resources in the City.

Any conditions of issuance of the riparian MMP shall be implemented as part of project construction activities that adversely affect riparian habitat. The riparian habitat MMP shall be developed by the project applicant(s) and submitted to the City before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the cottonwood willow riparian woodland and willow scrub on-site. The cottonwood–willow riparian forest habitat and willow woodland shall be either preserved or replaced on- or off-site on a no-net-loss basis because it provides functioning riparian habitat that is self-sustaining at the present time. If preservation of this on-site habitat type is chosen, the hydrology that supports this habitat must also be preserved to ensure the long-term viability of this habitat type.

The remainder of the riparian habitat on the project site consists mostly of old senescent trees and shrubs and does not appear to be regenerating. It is likely that portions of these communities would not persist at the site under the current environmental conditions even without project implementation. Because of the poor quality of the majority of the riparian habitat on the project site, the project mitigation for this riparian habitat shall be limited to the replacement and/or restoration of its current function and value (which consists of nesting and foraging habitat for raptors and other birds, as well as foraging habitat and shelter for numerous common wildlife species) as determined acceptable to the City in consultation with DFG as a trustee agency. of any riparian vegetation as
required for any project
phase.

Game.

3.10-3: Perform Tree Survey and Avoid or Replace Native Oak Trees and Other Native Trees Scattered Throughout the Project Site. Before the approval of any development in areas identified to contain trees, the City shall require that a determinate survey of tree species and size be performed. If any native oaks or other native trees of 6 inches or greater dbh, multitrunk native Before the approval of any
development in any project
phase that contains areas
that have been identified to
City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-20 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
oaks or native trees of 10 inches or greater dbh, or nonnative trees of 18 inches or greater dbh that have been determined by a qualified professional to be in good health are found to exist in the development area, such trees shall be avoided if feasible. If such trees cannot feasibly be avoided, the project applicant(s) for all project phases containing trees shall implement one of the following measures:
► All such trees that will be removed or otherwise damaged by project implementation shall be replaced at an inch-for-inch ratio. A replacement tree planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional or licensed landscape architect and shall be submitted to the City for approval before removal of trees; OR
► The project applicant(s) shall submit a mitigation plan that provides for complete mitigation of the removal of such trees in coordination with the City by a method comparable to an inch-byinch replacement. The mitigation plan shall be subject to City approval. ► The tree planting or mitigation plan shall include monitoring requirements and success criteria, as determined by a qualified professional, to ensure that replacement trees survive to maturity and can be reasonably expected to persist for the normal life span of the particular species being monitored. Monitoring of replacement trees shall continue for a period of five years following planting and trees that do not survive or meet the success criteria shall be replaced.

Loss of trees mitigated through implementation of mitigation measures associated with riparian habitat impacts shall not be subject to this mitigation measure. If the City adopts a tree preservation ordinance at any time in the future, any future development activities shall be subject to that ordinance instead.
contain trees.

3.10-4a: Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates and Implement Permit Conditions. No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for federally listed vernal pool invertebrates, or within adequate buffer areas (250 feet or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS), until a BO has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site construction. Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation describing methods to protect existing vernal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

A revised draft wetland MMP was developed by ECORP Consulting in June 2009 and is the Before the approval of any
grading or improvement
plans, before any grounddisturbing activities within
250 feet of said habitat, and
on an ongoing basis
throughout construction as
applicable for all project
phases as required by the
mitigation plan, BO, and/or
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Sacramento
District; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; and City of
Rancho Cordova Planning
Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-21 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
applicant’s proposed plan for addressing project impacts on habitats that potentially support federally listed vernal pool invertebrates. The draft MMP, included in Appendix Q to this document, is subject to review and approval by the appropriate regulatory agencies. Project implementation would result in the fill of 33.9 acres of habitat that could potentially support federally listed vernal pool invertebrates. This habitat consists of 17.5 acres of vernal pools, 4.2 acres of seasonal wetland swale, and 12.2 acres of seasonal wetlands. Indirect impacts on an additional 2.2 acres of vernal pools would also result from project implementation.

Proposed mitigation in the draft MMP includes a combination of on-site preservation and compensatory mitigation (i.e., creation of vernal pools), as well as off-site mitigation through purchase of a 160-acre property, known as the Cook Property, and credit purchase in the Clay Station Mitigation Bank. The Cook Property mitigation proposal would preserve 21.7 acres of existing wetland habitat, including 2.7 acres of vernal pools, 2.6 acres of seasonal wetland swale, and 9.9 acres of seasonal wetland within the Mather Core Recovery Area that could potentially support federally listed branchiopods. Surveys in the vicinity of the Cook Property have identified vernal pool fairy shrimp and vernal pool tadpole shrimp, and the property is contiguous with other conservation properties that support vernal pool habitat. The Clay Station Mitigation Bank would provide compensatory mitigation in the form of 16.7 acres of created vernal pool habitat that has met success criteria and currently supports both vernal pool fairy shrimp and vernal pool tadpole shrimp.

Proposed on-site mitigation consists of designation of a 507-acre wetland preserve in the southern portion of the project site. A total of 20.4 acres of existing vernal pools would be retained in the proposed preserve and an additional 13.4 acres would be restored and created in the preserve under the proposed MMP. The proposed preserve also contains 2.5 acres of seasonal wetland swale, 3.3 acres of seasonal wetland, 0.6 acre of pond, and 1.9 acres of ephemeral drainage. All of these features, as well as that portion of Morrison Creek that is within the 507-acre wetland preserve, would be preserved. In addition, the proposed draft MMP proposes creation of 16.9 acres of seasonal wetlands within the open space corridors that would be developed for the project.

In summary, the project would directly or indirectly affect 36.1 acres of potential vernal pool branchiopod habitat; the proposed MMP would preserve 41.4 acres of potential habitat and would create 47.8 acres of potential habitat. This would result in a preservation ratio of 1.15:1 and a compensatory mitigation ratio of 1.32:1, which would result in no net loss of vernal pool or seasonal wetland habitat that could potentially support federally listed vernal pool invertebrates. The details of the MMP are still being developed and reviewed by USACE, and the June 2009 draft is not the final, approved version.

The project applicant(s) shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss BMPs.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-22 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
of acreage, function, and value of affected vernal pool habitat. The final habitat MMP shall be consistent with the SSCHCP (if adopted) or shall provide an alternative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat.

The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall ensure that there is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and restoration of vernal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health. A watershed analysis of the hydrologic function of the wetland preserve was conducted by ECORP Consulting on behalf of the project applicant(s) (Appendix Q). GIS analysis of a hydrologic model created from LiDAR-derived topography and wetland delineation data was used to determine the minimum watershed area required to support hydrologic function of the wetlands within the preserve. It was found that the proposed configuration of the preserve would conserve almost 100% of the original watershed area and would not negatively affect the hydrologic function of existing vernal pools. The land used to satisfy this mitigation measure shall be protected through a conservation easement acceptable to USACE, the City, and USFWS.

The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall identify the extent of indirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identifying all such habitat within 250 feet of project construction activities or by providing an alternative technical evaluation. If a lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage of vernal pool habitat for each wetted acre of any indirectly affected vernal pool habitat at a ratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion of the Section 7 consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat, and before any ground-disturbing activity within 250 feet of the habitat. The project applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for direct or indirect impacts that have already been mitigated to the satisfaction of USFWS through another BO or mitigation plan.

A standard set of BMPs shall be applied to construction occurring in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USFWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3.4, “Drainage, Hydrology, and Water Quality,” of the 2006 DEIR/DEIS for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

3.10-4b: Obtain Incidental Take Permit for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.

No project construction shall proceed in areas containing VELB habitat (i.e., elderberry shrubs) until a BO has been issued by USFWS, and the project applicant(s) for all project phases have abided by all pertinent conditions in the BO relating to the proposed construction, including Before the approval of any
grading or improvement
plans or any grounddisturbing activity within
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Sacramento
District; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; California

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-23 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
conservation and minimization measures, intended to be completed before on-site construction.

Conservation and minimization measures are likely to include preparation of supporting documentation that describes methods for relocating and maintaining existing shrubs and associated vegetation.

Relocation of existing elderberry shrubs and planting of new elderberry seedlings shall be implemented on a no-net-loss basis. Detailed information on monitoring success of relocated and planted shrubs and measures to compensate (should success criteria not be met) would also likely be required in the BO. Ratios for mitigation of VELB habitat will ultimately be determined through the ESA Section 7 consultation process with USFWS, but shall be a minimum of “no net loss.” Section 7 consultation for the project is ongoing, and a VELB mitigation plan is being developed by ECORP Consulting. The final VELB mitigation plan may include transplanting all existing shrubs, as well as planting elderberry seedlings in the open space corridors, and purchase of credits in a USFWS-approved mitigation bank. Based on the current (dated) knowledge of the number of shrubs on-site and the latest VELB preservation guidelines, it is expected that approximately 3,088 seedlings would need to be planted over an area of approximately 25 acres to fulfill VELB mitigation requirements and no net loss of habitat. Implementation of the final approved plan would satisfy mitigation requirements for the removal of elderberry savanna, a sensitive habitat as identified by DFG, as well as single elderberry shrubs. A copy of the USFWSapproved mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any ground-disturbing activities within 100 feet of VELB habitat for all project phases.

Should delisting of VELB occur, a mitigation plan that would compensate for the removal of elderberry savanna, a sensitive habitat as identified by DFG, would still be required. The mitigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by DFG and the City before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any ground-disturbing activities that would affect elderberry savanna for all project phases.
100 feet of VELB habitat as
applicable for all project
phases, and on an ongoing
basis as required by the
mitigation plan and/or BO.

Department of Fish and
Game (if VELB delisted);
and City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

3.10-4c: Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for Nesting Raptors and, if Found, Establish Appropriate Buffers. To mitigate impacts on Swainson’s hawk and other raptors (including burrowing owl) for all project phases, the project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the project site and active burrows on the project site. The surveys shall be conducted before the approval of grading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construction for all project phases. To the extent feasible, guidelines Before the approval of
grading and improvement
plans, before any grounddisturbing activities, and
during project construction
as applicable for all project
phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-24 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
provided in Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in the Central Valley (Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000) shall be followed. If no nests are found, no further mitigation is required.

If active nests are found, impacts on nesting Swainson’s hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishment of appropriate buffers around the nests. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that any young have fledged and the nest is no longer active. DFG guidelines recommend implementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile buffers, but the size of the buffer may be adjusted if a qualified biologist and the City, in consultation with DFG, determine that such an adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect the nest.

Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after construction activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest.

If active burrows are found, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-disturbing activities. The City shall consult with DFG. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors on all burrows to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial burrows within the project vicinity, as needed. If active burrows contain eggs and/or young, no construction shall occur within 50 feet of the burrow until young have fledged. Once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside burrows, these burrows may be collapsed.

3.10-4d: Prepare and Implement a Swainson’s Hawk Mitigation Plan. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall implement one of the following measures:
► Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first, the project applicant(s) shall preserve, to the satisfaction of the City, suitable Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1:1 mitigation of habitat value for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat lost as a result of the project, as determined by the City after consultation with DFG and a qualified biologist.

The 1:1 habitat value shall be based on Swainson’s hawk nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, availability, and use within the City’s planning area. If specific data for Rancho Cordova’s Swainson’s hawk habitat are not available at the time that this mitigation measure is being implemented, the mitigation ratio shall be consistent with the 1994 DFG Swainson’s Hawk Guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through either the transfer of fee title or perpetual Before the approval of
grading, improvement, or
construction plans and
before any grounddisturbing activity in any
project development phase
that would affect
Swainson’s hawk foraging
habitat.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-25 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento County. The City, after consultation with DFG, will determine the appropriateness of the mitigation land.

Before approval of such proposed mitigation, the City shall consult with DFG regarding the appropriateness of the mitigation. If mitigation is accomplished through conservation easement, then such an easement shall ensure the continued management of the land to maintain Swainson’s hawk foraging values, including but not limited to ongoing agricultural uses and the maintenance of all existing water rights associated with the land. The conservation easement shall be recordable and shall prohibit any activity that substantially impairs or diminishes the land’s capacity as suitable Swainson’s hawk habitat.

The project applicant(s) shall transfer said Swainson’s hawk mitigation land, through either conservation easement or fee title, to a third-party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and DFG named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 815.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City, after consultation with DFG. The City, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form of the conservation easement. The City, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

The project applicant(s), after consultation with the City, DFG, and the Conservation Operator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement of the conservation easement. If an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City to be distributed to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nonprofit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity. The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest of any conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior written approval of the City and DFG.

If the Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transferred to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG.

The City Planning Department shall ensure that mitigation habitat is properly established and

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-26 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
is functioning as habitat by conducting regular monitoring of the mitigation site(s) for the first 10 years after establishment of the easement. OR
► The project applicant(s) may participate in a future City Swainson’s Hawk Foraging Habitat Ordinance (once adopted) as an alternative to the measure above. OR ► The project applicant(s) may participate in a future habitat conservation plan (once adopted) as an alternative to the above measures.

3.10-5: Incorporate Measures to Protect Greene’s Legenere in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Direct impacts on the population of Greene’s legenere located within the wetland preserve shall be avoided to the maximum extent feasible.

An MMP for Greene’s legenere is being developed on behalf of the project applicant(s) by ECORP Consulting. Before the approval of grading plans or any ground-breaking activity within 250 feet of any Greene’s legenere population, the mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The plan shall be submitted concurrently to DFG and USFWS for review and comment, and the City may consult with these entities before approval of the plan. The plan is required to maintain viable plant populations on-site and shall include avoidance measures for the existing population to be retained and mitigation measures for the populations to be directly affected. Possible avoidance measures include fencing of the population before construction and exclusion of project activities from the fenced-off areas, and construction monitoring by a qualified botanist to keep construction crews away from the population. Indirect impacts (i.e., changes in hydrology) shall be minimized by placing culverts to the vernal pool where this population occurs, if necessary. Possible mitigation for the two populations of Greene’s legenere that would be removed during construction of the drainage parkway includes the collection of seeds from the existing populations and inoculation of the collected seeds into existing or compensatory vernal pools within the wetland preserve.

The mitigation plan proposes that the best option for the successful germination of seeds would be to inoculate existing pools that are similar in size and depth and hydration period, and with similar associated species as the pools that currently support Greene’s legenere. Mitigation for the populations of legenere proposed to be directly affected shall commence before the approval of any plans for, or any ground-breaking activities near, the locations of such legenere populations.

Monitoring of the existing population of Greene’s legenere and the seeded populations shall be conducted in conjunction with monitoring of vernal pools and shall continue for a minimum period of 5 years.

Before the approval of
grading or improvement
plans or any groundbreaking activity within 250
feet of any Greene’s
legenere population,
including grubbing and
clearing, for any project
development phase.

Ongoing monitoring shall
occur for a minimum of 5
years following the
completion of all
construction activities.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-27 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement

3.11 VISUAL RESOURCES

3.11-3: Require Development to Conform to City General Plan Design Guidelines. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall include design, architectural, development, and maintenance standards in the Rio del Oro Specific Plan that will ensure minimization of impacts to the existing visual character of the site. Through this process the project applicant(s) shall ensure that urban development at the project site is substantially consistent with the Design Guidelines adopted as part of the City General Plan.

OR
Before the approval of building permits, all structures and facilities shall adhere to the City’s design review process.

Before approval of building
permits for all structures
within all project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

3.11-4: Screen Construction Staging Areas. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall locate staging and material storage areas as far away from sensitive land uses (i.e., residential areas, schools, parks) and/or nearby roadways as possible. Staging and material storage areas shall be approved by the City before the approval of grading plans and building permits for all project phases, and shall be screened from adjacent occupied land uses in earlier development phases to the maximum extent practicable. Screens may include berms or fences. The screen design shall be approved by the City to reduce further visual effects to the extent possible.

Before approval of grading
plans and building permits,
and during all phases of
construction for all project
phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department.

3.11-5: Screen Mining Areas. Before the issuance of certificates of occupancy and final inspections for facilities where mining activities will be visible, the project applicant(s) for all project phases shall visually screen project-related development from mining activities to the maximum extent practicable. If mining activities, including reclamation activities, are anticipated to occur for more than 1 year after project approval, a combination of fast-growing shrubs and trees shall be planted around mining project boundaries to provide screening.

Before the issuance of
certificates of occupancy
and final inspections for
facilities where mining
activities would be visible
for all project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

3.11-6: Establish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and Implement a Lighting Plan. To reduce impacts associated with light and glare, the project applicant(s) for all project phases shall conform to the following guidelines:
► Meet the minimum City lighting standards for all project-related lighting. All lighting fixtures shall be designed to be consistent with the Design Guidelines contained in the City General Plan.

Before approval of building
permits for all phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning and Public Works
Departments.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-28 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
► Shield or screen lighting fixtures to direct the light downward and prevent light spill on adjacent properties.
► Place and direct flood or area lighting needed for construction activities or for nighttime sporting activities to not disturb adjacent residential areas and passing motorists. ► Prohibit the use of harsh mercury vapor, low-pressure sodium, or fluorescent bulbs for public lighting in residential neighborhoods.
► Use appropriate building materials, lighting, and signage in the office/commercial areas to prevent light and glare from adversely affecting motorists on nearby roadways. ► Design exterior lighting as an integral part of the building and landscape design in the Rio del Oro Specific Plan area. Lighting fixtures shall be architecturally consistent with the overall site design and character and shall be consistent with the City’s Design Guidelines. ► Establish standards for outdoor lighting to reduce high-intensity nighttime lighting and glare as part of the Rio del Oro Specific Plan design guidelines/standards. Consideration shall be given to design features, namely directional shielding for street lighting, parking lot lighting, and other significant light sources, that will reduce effects of nighttime lighting. In addition, consideration shall be given to the use of automatic shutoffs or motion sensors for lighting features to further reduce excess nighttime light. All nighttime lighting shall be shielded to prevent the light from shining off of the surface intended to be illuminated.

A lighting plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval which shall include the above elements. The lighting plan may be submitted concurrently with other improvement plans, and shall be submitted before the installation of any lighting or the approval of building permits for all phases. The project applicant(s) of all future phases shall implement the approved lighting plan.

3.13 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

3.13-2a: Require the Project Applicant(s) to Cooperate with Aerojet and Regulatory Agencies to Preserve, Modify, or Close Existing Groundwater Monitoring Wells. The project applicant(s) shall work with Aerojet, DTSC, and the Central Valley RWQCB or any successor to establish the preservation, modification, or closure of existing groundwater monitoring wells. If groundwater wells are to be affected by proposed tentative maps, then the project applicant(s) or successors shall provide the City with evidence that the relocation, modification, or closure of the well(s) is approved by the appropriate agencies as part of the City’s final map approval process Before approval of small-lot
tentative maps for any
portions of the project site
except the Phase 1 area as
shown in Exhibit 3.13-1.

California Department of
Toxic Substances Control,
Central Valley Regional
Water Quality Control
Board, Aerojet General
Corporation, and City of
Rancho Cordova Planning

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-29 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
and before development. Department.

3.13-2b: Coordinate Development Activities to Avoid Interference with Remediation Activities. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall provide notice to Aerojet or any successor in interest and DTSC, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the City of the location, nature, and duration of construction activities within each phase of development at least 1 month before the construction activities begin in areas on or near property with current or planned remediation activities. Before the approval of grading plans for all project phases, the project applicant(s) shall work with Aerojet, DTSC, and the Central Valley RWQCB or any successor to schedule the timing of construction activities to prevent potential conflicts with remediation activities.

Before approval of grading
plans and during
construction activities for all
project phases.

California Department of
Toxic Substances Control,
Central Valley Regional
Water Quality Control
Board, Aerojet General
Corporation, and City of
Rancho Cordova Planning
Department.

3.13-2c: Notify the City in Writing that DTSC-Required Notification Obligations Regarding Deed Restrictions and/or Easements Have Been Fulfilled. Pursuant to its oversight over investigations of hazardous substances and determination of remedial action, DTSC establishes, as appropriate, deed restrictions (e.g., restrictions on future groundwater uses or future land uses) or easements (e.g., continued access to groundwater wells and pipelines) on property with associated notice requirements. The project applicant(s) for all such affected project phases shall provide notification in writing to the City that said required DTSC notification obligations have been fulfilled. Evidence of the method of notification required by DTSC shall be submitted to the City before approval of final maps and/or the issuance of permits for sales trailers and model homes.

The project applicant(s) for such affected project phases shall coordinate with the City to include this provision as part of tentative map approval.

Before approval of small-lot
final maps and/or issuance
of permits for sales trailers
and model homes for all
project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Planning Department.

3.13-3: Conduct a Hazardous-Building-Materials Study and Implement all Applicable Regulations. Before the approval of demolition permits for any existing on-site buildings, the project applicant(s) for all project phases, except development Phase 1 shall hire a qualified consultant to investigate whether any of the existing on-site structures contain lead or ACMs that could become friable or mobile during demolition activities. If lead-containing materials or ACMs are found, the project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the County Environmental Management Department to ensure that such materials are properly removed (i.e., by an accredited inspector in accordance with EPA and Cal-OSHA standards). In addition, all activities (construction or demolition) in the vicinity of these materials shall comply with Cal-OSHA standards related to exposure of workers to asbestos and lead. The lead-containing materials and ACMs shall be handled properly and transported to an appropriate off-site disposal facility.

Before approval of
demolition permits for
existing on-site structures
and during all demolition
activities for all project
phases, except development
Phase1.

County of Sacramento
Environmental Management
Department and City of
Rancho Cordova Planning
Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-30 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement

3.13-5: Implement Public-Safety Features during Construction Activities and Mining Operations. The following public-safety protection features shall be implemented before the approval of grading plans and building permits for all project phases, and before issuance of future mining permits:
► Temporary fencing shall be installed around construction areas with signage indicating the presence of an active construction zone, and warning the public to keep out. ► Temporary fencing shall be installed around mining areas with signage indicating the presence of active mining operations, and warning the public to keep out. ► Mining equipment shall not be operated and mining activities shall not occur within 1,100 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor, or within 375 feet if a temporary barrier is constructed in accordance with the following specifications:
● The barrier shall be located as close to the noise source or as close to the receptor as possible and shall break the line of sight between the source and receptor. ● The barrier shall be constructed with three-quarter-inch Medium Density Overlay (MDO) plywood sheeting, or other acceptable material having a surface weight of 2 pounds per square foot (lb/sf) or greater, and a demonstrated Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25 or greater as defined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method E90.
● Weather- and abuse-resistant material shall be used for a temporary acoustical curtain.

The material shall exhibit superior hanging and tear strength during construction with a surface weight of at least 1 lb/sf. The material shall have a minimum breaking strength of 120 pounds per inch (lb/in) per Federal Test Method Standard (FTMS) 191 A-M5102 and minimum tear strength of 30 lb/in per ASTM Test Method D117. Based on the same test procedures, the absorptive material facing shall have a minimum breaking strength of 100 lb/in and minimum tear strength of 7 lb/in. The material shall have an STC rating of 25 or greater, based on certified sound transmission loss data taken according to ASTM Test Method E90. It shall also have a Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) rating of 0.70 or greater, based on certified sound absorption coefficient data according to ASTM Test Method C423.
● The mating surfaces of the barrier sides shall be installed flush with each other. Gaps between barrier units, and between the bottom edge of the barrier panels and the ground, shall be closed with material that will completely close the gaps, and be dense enough to attenuate noise.

Before the approval of
grading plans and building
permits for all project
phases, before issuance of
future mining permits, and
during all project
construction for all project
phases and mining activities.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department
and Building and Safety
Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-31 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement

3.13-6: Develop and Implement Site-Specific Wetland Mosquito Management Guidelines.

Before the start of construction activities for all project phases, the project applicant(s) shall develop a set of site-specific Wetland Mosquito Management Guidelines. The guidelines shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The project applicant(s) shall implement the guidelines once they have been approved.

Before the start of
construction activities and as
specified in the guidelines
for all project phases.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department
and Building and Safety
Department.

3.14 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

3.14-1: Mitigation Measure Common to All Impacts under Impact 3.14-1 To avoid repetition, the information contained in the following mitigation measure applies to all other mitigation measures required under Impact 3.14-1. The project applicant(s) for all project phases shall participate in the necessary improvements identified in all of the following mitigation measures. The project’s fair-share participation and the associated timing of the improvements shall be identified in Tier 2 entitlements for the project and before any Development Activity, as that term is defined in the Tier 1 Development Agreements, on the property.The mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the project will be amended to include these participation and timing details for traffic improvements.

The timing and enforcement would be the same for all identified mitigation measures associated with Impact 3.14-1.

As part of Tier 2
entitlements and before any
Development Activity, as
that term is defined in the
Tier 1 Development
Agreements.

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-32 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement

3.14-1a: Participate in Improvements to the SR 16/Excelsior Road Intersection (Intersection 1). To ensure that the SR 16/Excelsior Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, all of the following improvements are required:
► The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane.
► The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.
► The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one right-turn lane.
► The westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.

These improvements would require widening of SR 16 east and west of the intersection to accommodate the additional lanes.

Improvements to the SR 16/Excelsior Road intersection are contained within the SunRidge Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan and zoning conditions. The CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan/SunRidge Specific Plan Project state that physical improvement of this intersection is feasible.

Implementation of the improvements described above would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operations. If these improvements are completed concurrent with development of the SunRidge Specific Plan and implemented before development Phase 1 of the Rio del Oro project, then the project impact at this intersection would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Improvements to this intersection must be coordinated with Caltrans, the County, and other potentially affected oversight agencies.

The impact conclusion reached in the DEIR/DEIS is significant and unavoidable because the identified improvements fall under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and the County, and neither the City nor the project applicant(s) would have control over their timing or implementation.

See timing listed for 3.14-1. See enforcement listed for

3.14-1.

3.14-1b: Participate in Improvements at the SR 16/Eagles Nest Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensure that the SR 16/Eagles Nest Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal must be installed at this intersection, and the eastbound and westbound approaches See timing listed for 3.14-1. See enforcement listed for

3.14-1.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-33 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/rightturn lane.

These improvements would require widening of SR 16 for 1,000 feet on both sides of this intersection to accommodate the additional through lanes.

Improvements to the SR 16/Eagles Nest Road intersection are contained within the SunRidge Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan and zoning conditions. The CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan/SunRidge Specific Plan Project state that physical improvement of this intersection is feasible.

Implementation of the improvements described above, including the necessary widening of SR 16, would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection. If these improvements are completed concurrent with development of the SunRidge Specific Plan and implemented before development Phase 1 of the Rio del Oro project, then the project impact at this intersection would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Improvements to this intersection must be coordinated with Caltrans, the County, and other potentially affected oversight agencies.

3.14-1c: Participate in Improvements to the SR 16/Sunrise Boulevard Intersection (Intersection 3). To ensure that the SR 16/Sunrise Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane; and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane.

An additional through lane would be needed in the eastbound and westbound directions, which would require widening of SR 16 on both sides of the intersection for a minimum of 1,000 feet in both directions. With these improvements, this intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS.

Improvements to the SR 16/Sunrise Boulevard intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, are scheduled for Measure A funding, and are within the Mather Field Specific Plan Financing Plan. Implementation of the improvements described above, including the necessary widening of SR 16, would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection. If these improvements are completed concurrent with development of the Mather Field Specific Plan and implemented before development Phase 1 of the Rio del Oro project, then the project impact at this intersection would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

See timing listed for 3.14-1. See enforcement listed for

3.14-1.

Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project AECOM
City of Rancho Cordova and USACE MMRP-34 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 9
Exhibit C to the Resolution
Note: PP = Proposed Project Alternative; HD = High Density Alternative; IM = Impact Minimization Alternative; NF = No Federal Action Alternative; NP = No Project Alternative.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing Enforcement
Improvements to this intersection must be coordinated with Caltrans, the County, and other potentially affected oversight agencies.

The impact conclusion reached in the DEIR/DEIS is significant and unavoidable because the identified improvements fall under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and the County, and neither the City nor the project applicant(s) would have control over their timing or implementation.

3.14-1d: Participate in Improvements to the SR 16/Grant Line Road Intersection (Intersection 4). To ensure that the SR 16/Grant Line Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, all of the following improvements are required:
► The northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane.
► Protected left-turn signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches.
► The eastbound and westbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane.

These improvements would require widening of SR 16 1,000 feet on both sides of the intersection.

Improvements to the SR 16/Grant Line Road intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, are scheduled for Measure A funding, and are within the Mather Field Specific Plan Financing Plan. Implementation of the improvements described above, including the necessary widening of SR 16, would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection; with them, this intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS. If these improvements are completed concurrent with development of the Mather Field Specific Plan and implemented before development Phase 1 of the Rio del Oro project, then the project impact at this intersection would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Improvements to this intersection must be coordinated with Caltrans, the County, and other potentially affected oversight agencies.

See timing listed for 3.14-1. See enforcement listed for

3.14-1.

3.14-1e: Participate in Improvements to the Florin Road/Sunrise Boulevard Intersection (Intersection 5). To ensure that the Florin Road/Sunrise Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one through lane and See timing listed for 3.14-1. See enforcement listed for

3.14-1.