Agenda packet — Rancho Cordova City Council, March 21, 2022 (part 5 of 10)

Table F-3
Rio del Oro Specific PlanImplementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Quantity (Total) Total Elliott Portion Costs Quantity (East of RCP) Unit Price Amount (East of RCP) Quantity (West of RCP) Amount (West of RCP) Notes

AWARDED BID ELLIOTT PORTION
91 Pipe Abandon and Removal LS 1 $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
92 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 55,900 $0.45 $ 25,155.00 93 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SF 3,890 $3.00 $ 11,670.00 94 Temporary Traffic Stripe (Paint) LF 34,200 $0.33 $ 11,286.00 95 Roadside Sign EA 18 $315.00 $ 5,670.00 96 Relocate Sign EA 2 $200.00 $ 400.00 97 Object Marker EA 7 $75.00 $ 525.00 98 Channelizer (Surface Mounted) EA 60 $33.00 $ 1,980.00 99 Sound Wall SF 2,400 $64.00 $ 153,600.00 100 Traffic Signal – Fitzgerald Road LS 1 $400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 101 Traffic Signal – Rancho Cordova Pkwy LS 1 $340,000.00 $ 340,000.00 102 Traffic Signal – Collector A LS 1 $320,000.00 $ 320,000.00 1.00 $320,000.00 1.00 $320,000.000 $320,000.00 0.00 $0.00103 Intersection Lighting/Traffic Signal Conduit – Luyung Drive LS 1 $200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 104 Traffic Signal Conduit – Future Collector (“Arenal Drive”) LS 1 $44,000.00 $ 44,000.00 1.00 $44,000.00 1.00 $44,000.000 $44,000.00 0.00 $0.00 105 Street Lighting LS 1 $60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
106 Traffic Signal Interconnect Conduit LF 9,400 $57.00 $ 535,800.00 107 12-Strand Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable LF 600 $9.00 $ 5,400.00 108 96-Strand Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable LF 7,100 $6.00 $ 42,600.00 109 Soil Amendment SF 36,900 $ 0.65 $ 23,985.00 110 1 Gallon Groundcover EA 1,870 $ 45.50 $ 85,085.00 111 4" Pot Groundcover EA 5,400 $ 8.50 $ 45,900.00 112 Mulch CY 345 $ 80.00 $ 27,600.00 113 Plant Establishment Period LS 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 114 4" PVC Irrigation Conduit LF 1,700 $ 10.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 7,562,588.00 $ 815,918.96 $ 599,328.16 $ 216,590.81
$ 1,313,600.00 $ 304,465.00
$ 2,043,500.00 $ - $ 461,652.00 $ - $ 205,570.00 $ - $ 11,586,910.00 $ 3,476,073.00 $ 15,062,983.00

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (LANDSCAPE)

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE
30% (SURVEYS, DESIGN, INSPECTION & CONTINGENCY)
TOTAL

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS)

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (DRAINAGE)

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (WATER)

TOTAL (JOINT TRENCH) (ELLIOTT CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILTY) F-5
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 556 of 1447 ends

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ITEM 10.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 557 of 1447 ends

Table F-4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to West Elliott Boundary & East of Elliott/Aerojet Boundary (Non-Elliot Frontage) Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 0.3 $555,000.00 $ 166,500.00
2 Clearing and Grubbing LS 0.3 $100,000.00 $ 30,000.00
3 Construction Staking LS 0.3 $150,000.00 $ 45,000.00
4 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 0.3 $15,000.00 $ 4,500.00 5 Temporary Check Dam LF 75.0 $3.00 $ 225.00
6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 8.0 $115.00 $ 920.00 7 Fiber Roll LF 1,845.0 $2.20 $ 4,059.00
8 Hydroseed ACRE 0.7 $2,600.00 $ 1,820.00
9 Traffic Control System LS 0.3 $574,714.50 $ 172,414.35 10 Construction Area Signs LS 0.3 $25,000.00 $ 7,500.00 11 Alternative Temporary Crash Cushion EA 1.0 $2,550.00 $ 2,550.00 12 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF 950.0 $25.00 $ 23,750.00 13 Temporary High-Visibility Fence LF 26.0 $2.30 $ 59.80 14 Roadway Excavation (F) CY 1,050.0 $12.50 $ 13,125.00 15 Unsuitable Material Excavation and Replacement (Contingency) CY 810.0 $21.00 $ 17,010.00 16 Remove Base and Surfacing SF 0.0 $2.00 $ -
17 Remove Sidewalk LF 465.0 $6.75 $ 3,138.75
18 Remove Curb and Gutter LF 565.0 $6.75 $ 3,813.75
19 Remove Curb Ramp EA 3.0 $500.00 $ 1,500.00
20 Remove Culvert LF 0.0 $40.00 $ -
21 Remove Fence LF 990.0 $1.50 $ 1,485.00
22 Remove Barricade EA 3.0 $450.00 $ 1,350.00
23 Remove Sign EA 11.0 $100.00 $ 1,100.00
24 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 4,210.0 $66.00 $ 277,860.00 25 Place HMA Dike (Type A) LF 45.0 $11.00 $ 495.00
26 Place HMA Dike (Type E) LF 581.0 $14.00 $ 8,134.00
27 Place HMA Overside Drain EA 1.0 $1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 28 Cold Plane AC Pavement SY 12,660.0 $2.75 $ 34,815.00 29 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 4,115.0 $30.00 $ 123,450.00 30 Shoulder Backing TON 108.0 $45.00 $ 4,860.00
31 PCC Type 2 Curb & Gutter LF 930.0 $45.00 $ 41,850.00 32 PCC Type 3 Curb LF 210.0 $65.00 $ 13,650.00
33 PCC Type 5 Curb LF 243.0 $15.00 $ 3,645.00
34 PCC Cross Gutter SF 610.0 $60.00 $ 36,600.00
35 PCC Driveway SF 760.0 $14.00 $ 10,640.00
36 PCC Sidewalk SF 4,813.0 $10.00 $ 48,130.00
37 PCC Stamped & Colored SF 0.0 $17.00 $ -
38 Curb Ramp EA 14.0 $3,700.00 $ 51,800.00
39 Detectable Warning Surface EA 14.0 $525.00 $ 7,350.00 40 Adjust Valve to Finished Grade EA 1.0 $850.00 $ 850.00 41 Adjust Manhole to Finished Grade EA 10.0 $1,200.00 $ 12,000.00 42 Sidewalk Barricade EA 1.0 $750.00 $ 750.00
F-6
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 558 of 1447 ends

Table F-4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to West Elliott Boundary & East of Elliott/Aerojet Boundary (Non-Elliot Frontage) Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 43 Street Closure Barricade EA 0.0 $2,000.00 $ -
44 Type II Barricade EA 10.0 $50.00 $ 500.00
45 Type III Barricade EA 40.0 $110.00 $ 4,400.00
46 Security Fence LF 320.0 $27.30 $ 8,736.00
47 16’ Security Gate EA 1.0 $3,050.00 $ 3,050.00
48 Fence (Type BW) LF 510.0 $14.00 $ 7,140.00
49 16’ Wire Mesh Gate EA 1.0 $1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
50 Decorative Metal Fence LF 65.0 $259.00 $ 16,835.00
51 Decorative Metal Gate EA 1.0 $20,150.00 $ 20,150.00
52 Midwest Guardrail System LF 125.0 $57.00 $ 7,125.00
53 Alternative In-Line Terminal System EA 2.0 $3,700.00 $ 7,400.00 54 Type B Drop Inlet EA 2.0 $3,000.00 $ 6,000.00
55 OCP Drop Inlet EA 0.0 $3,100.00 $ -
56 OMP Drop Inlet EA 0.0 $2,000.00 $ -
57 12” C900 PVC Pipe LF 228.0 $90.00 $ 20,520.00
58 18” C900 PVC Pipe LF 0.0 $130.00 $ -
59 24” C900 PVC Pipe LF 0.0 $185.00 $ -
60 15” Class III RCP LF 0.0 $75.00 $ -
61 30” HDPE Pipe LF 0.0 $105.00 $ -
62 42” HDPE Pipe LF 0.0 $150.00 $ -
63 48” Storm Drain Manhole EA 1.0 $6,900.00 $ 6,900.00
64 60” Storm Drain Manhole EA 0.0 $9,000.00 $ -
65 15” Flared End Section EA 0.0 $1,400.00 $ -
66 Install 8” DIP (Restrained) LF 115.0 $120.00 $ 13,800.00 67 Install 10” DIP (Restrained) LF 470.0 $110.00 $ 51,700.00 68 Install 12” DIP LF 690.0 $80.00 $ 55,200.00
69 Install 12” DIP (Restrained) LF 570.0 $200.00 $ 114,000.00 70 Install 16” DIP LF 2,180.0 $115.00 $ 250,700.00
71 Install 16” DIP (Restrained) LF 610.0 $250.00 $ 152,500.00 72 Install 24” DIP LF 2,060.0 $145.00 $ 298,700.00
73 Install 24” DIP (Restrained) LF 870.0 $425.00 $ 369,750.00 74 Install 30” DIP (Restrained) LF 82.0 $675.00 $ 55,350.00 75 Install 10” Gate Valve EA 2.0 $3,400.00 $ 6,800.00
76 Install 12” Butterfly Valve EA 11.0 $5,500.00 $ 60,500.00 77 Install 16” Butterfly Valve EA 5.0 $8,900.00 $ 44,500.00 78 Install 24” Butterfly Valve EA 6.0 $20,000.00 $ 120,000.00 79 Install 30” Butterfly Valve EA 1.0 $35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 80 Install 4” In-Line Blow Off Assembly EA 2.0 $7,300.00 $ 14,600.00 81 Install 4” Temporary Blow Off Assembly EA 3.0 $6,400.00 $ 19,200.00 82 Install 6” Temporary Blow Off Assembly EA 2.0 $23,000.00 $ 46,000.00 83 Install 8” Temporary Blow Off Assembly EA 3.0 $19,000.00 $ 57,000.00 84 Install 1” Combo Air Release / Vacuum Assembly EA 1.0 $4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 F-7
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 559 of 1447 ends

Table F-4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to West Elliott Boundary & East of Elliott/Aerojet Boundary (Non-Elliot Frontage) Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 85 Install 2” Combo Air Release / Vacuum Assembly EA 1.0 $8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 86 Install Wire Locating Station EA 5.0 $1,100.00 $ 5,500.00 87 Install Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 5.0 $12,500.00 $ 62,500.00 88 Reconnect 6” Water Service EA 1.0 $19,000.00 $ 19,000.00 89 Tie-In to Existing Pipelines EA 3.0 $8,000.00 $ 24,000.00 90 Disinfection and Testing LS 1.0 $150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 91 Pipe Abandon and Removal LS 1.0 $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 92 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 20,590.0 $0.45 $ 9,265.50 93 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SF 755.0 $3.00 $ 2,265.00 94 Temporary Traffic Stripe (Paint) LF 5,670.0 $0.33 $ 1,871.10 95 Roadside Sign EA 9.0 $315.00 $ 2,835.00
96 Relocate Sign EA 2.0 $200.00 $ 400.00
97 Object Marker EA 2.0 $75.00 $ 150.00
98 Channelizer (Surface Mounted) EA 0.0 $33.00 $ -
99 Sound Wall SF 7,000.0 $64.00 $ 448,000.00
100 Traffic Signal – Fitzgerald Road LS 1.0 $400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 101 Traffic Signal – Rancho Cordova Pkwy LS 0.0 $340,000.00 $ - 102 Traffic Signal – Collector A LS 0.0 $320,000.00 $ - 103 Intersection Lighting/Traffic Signal Conduit – Luyung Drive LS 1.0 $200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 104 Traffic Signal Conduit – Future Collector (“Arenal Drive”) LS 0.0 $44,000.00 $ - 105 Street Lighting LS 1.0 $60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
106 Traffic Signal Interconnect Conduit LF 2,820.0 $57.00 $ 160,740.00 107 12-Strand Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable LF 180.0 $9.00 $ 1,620.00 108 96-Strand Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable LF 2,130.0 $6.00 $ 12,780.00 109 Irrigation - Sleeving LF 0.0 $ 10.00 $ -
110 Irrigation - POC / Master Valve / Flow Sensor EA 0.0 $ 3,600.00 $ - 111 Irrigation - Controller EA 0.0 $ 4,600.00 $ -
112 Irrigation - Mainline LF 0.0 $ 14.50 $ -
113 Irrigation - Wire LF 0.0 $ 1.25 $ -
114 Irrigation - Gate Valves EA 0.0 $ 560.00 $ -
115 Irrigation - Quick Coupler Valves EA 0.0 $ 460.00 $ - 116 Irrigation - Remote Control Valves EA 0.0 $ 490.00 $ - 117 Irrigation - Laterals LF 0.0 $ 7.00 $ -
118 Irrigation - Tree Bubblers EA 0.0 $ 60.00 $ -
119 Irrigation - Audit EA 0.0 $ 1,460.00 $ -
120 Soil Preparation - Amendment / Finish Grading SF 0.0 $ 0.65 $ - 121 Planting - 15 Gallon Trees EA 0.0 $ 400.00 $ -
122 Planting - Root Barriers EA 0.0 $ 30.00 $ -
123 Planting - Bark Mulch CY 0.0 $ 80.00 $ -
124 Plant Establishment Period - 120 Days LS 0.0 $ 12,000.00 $ - F-8
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 560 of 1447 ends

Table F-4
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to West Elliott Boundary & East of Elliott/Aerojet Boundary (Non-Elliot Frontage) Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount $ 2,556,262.25
$ 33,420.00
$ 2,043,500.00
$ -
$ 4,633,182.25
$ 1,389,954.68
$ 6,023,136.93
TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (LANDSCAPE - ITEMS 109 - 124)

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE
30% (SURVEYS, DESIGN, INSPECTION & CONTINGENCY)

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE
TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - ITEMS 1-53 AND 92-108) TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (DRAINAGE - ITEMS 54 - 65)
TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (WATER - ITEMS 66 - 91)
F-9
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 561 of 1447 ends

Table F-5
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway (Elliot Pay Items - Surface Improvements) Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 2 Clearing and Grubbing LS 0.09 $100,000.00 $9,000.00
3 Construction Staking LS 0.09 $150,000.00 $13,500.00
4 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 0.09 $15,000.00 $1,350.00 6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 9.00 $115.00 $1,035.00 7 Fiber Roll LF 1943.00 $2.20 $4,274.60
8 Hydroseed ACRE 1.20 $2,600.00 $3,120.00
9 Traffic Control System LS 0.09 $574,714.50 $51,724.31 10 Construction Area Signs LS 0.09 $25,000.00 $2,250.00 11 Alternative Temporary Crash Cushion EA 0.18 $2,550.00 $459.00 12 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF 69.91 $25.00 $1,747.75 13 Temporary High-Visibility Fence LF 350.00 $2.30 $805.00 14 Roadway Excavation (F) CY 723.00 $12.50 $9,037.50
24 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 190.00 $66.00 $12,540.00 29 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 300.00 $30.00 $9,000.00
31 PCC Type 2 Curb & Gutter LF 2577.00 $25.00 $64,425.00 36 PCC Sidewalk SF 2571.00 $10.00 $25,710.00
38 Curb Ramp EA 6.00 $3,700.00 $22,200.00
39 Detectable Warning Surface EA 6.00 $525.00 $3,150.00 102 Traffic Signal – Collector A LS 1.00 $320,000.00 $320,000.00 104 Traffic Signal Conduit – Future Collector (“Arenal Drive”) LS 1.00 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 $ 599,328.16
$ 734,176.99
East of Rancho Cordova Parkway

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS)
TOTAL ELLIOTT PAYMENT TO CITY AT 122.5% OF HARD CONSTRUCTION COSTS 202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-10 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 562 of 1447 ends

Table F-5
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Cost Share Estimate - White Rock Road-Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway (Elliot Pay Items - Surface Improvements) Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 2 Clearing and Grubbing LS 0.09 $100,000.00 $9,000.00
3 Construction Staking LS 0.09 $150,000.00 $13,500.00
4 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 0.09 $15,000.00 $1,350.00 6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 10.00 $115.00 $1,150.00 9 Traffic Control System LS 0.09 $574,714.50 $51,724.31 10 Construction Area Signs LS 0.09 $25,000.00 $2,250.00 14 Roadway Excavation (F) CY 813.00 $12.50 $10,162.50
24 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 269.00 $66.00 $17,754.00 29 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 698.00 $30.00 $20,940.00 31 PCC Type 2 Curb & Gutter LF 2224.00 $25.00 $55,600.00 36 PCC Sidewalk SF 1626.00 $10.00 $16,260.00
38 Curb Ramp EA 4.00 $3,700.00 $14,800.00
39 Detectable Warning Surface EA 4.00 $525.00 $2,100.00 $ 216,590.81
$ 238,249.89
$ 972,426.88
West of Rancho Cordova Parkway

TOTAL BASE BID PRICE (SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS)
TOTAL ELLIOTT PAYMENT TO CITY AT 110% OF HARD CONSTRUCTION COSTS

TOTAL ELLIOTT PAYMENT TO CITY
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-11 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 563 of 1447 ends

Table F-6
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Rio del Oro White Rock Road Costs and Credits/Reimbursements

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST

1. Subgrade Preparation 63 s.f $0.15 $9.45

2. Excavation 4.5 c.y. $12.50 $56.25

3. 6" HMA (Type A) 2 tons $66.00 $138.60

4. 17" Aggregate Base 3 c.y $30.00 $90.00

5. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 l.f. $25.00 $25.00

6. Median Curb, Type 5 (6" Barrier Curb) 2 l.f. $15.00 $30.00

7. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (turf & street trees) 13 s.f. $5.57 $72.42

8. Median Top Soil Import (18") 0.8 c.y. $10.00 $8.00

9. Signing & Striping 1 l.f. $6.39 $6.39

10. Erosion Control 119 s.f. $0.10 $11.90

11. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 2 l.f. $12.09 $24.17

12. Joint Trench 1 l.f. $93.00 $93.00

13. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 l.f. $57.00 $57.00

14. 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6 s.f. $10.00 $60.00
Subtotal $682.19
30% (surveys, design, inspection and contingency) $204.66 Grand Total per Foot $886.85
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
White Rock Road 98-Foot Right-of-Way
(4 Travel Lanes and Inside Landscaped Median)
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-12 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 564 of 1447 ends

Table F-7
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

Rio del Oro Major White Rock Road Developer Costs

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICEPER FT COST

1. Subgrade Preparation 19.0 s.f $0.15 $2.85

2. Excavation 1.3 c.y. $12.50 $16.25

3. 6" HMA (Type A) 0.7 tons $66.00 $47.52

4. 17" Aggregate Base 0.8 c.y $30.00 $24.90

5. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1.0 l.f. $25.00 $25.00

6. Median Curb, Type 5 (6" Barrier Curb) 0.0 l.f. $15.00 $0.00

7. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (turf & street trees) 0.0 s.f. $5.57 $0.00

8. Median Top Soil Import (18") 0.0 c.y. $10.00 $0.00

9. Signing & Striping 0.3 l.f. $6.39 $1.92

10. Erosion Control 50.0 s.f. $0.10 $5.00

11. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing) 1.0 l.f. $12.09 $12.09

12. Joint Trench 1.0 l.f. $93.00 $93.00

13. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1.0 l.f. $57.00 $57.00

14. 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6.0 s.f. $10.00 $60.00
Subtotal $345.53
30% (surveys, design, inspection and contingency) $103.66 Grand Total per Foot $449.18
Preliminary Developer Cost Per Linear Foot
98' R.O.W. (White Rock Road)
(4 Travel Lanes and Inside Landscaped Median)
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-13 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 565 of 1447 ends

Table F-8
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

White Rock Road Intersection Costs and Credits/Reimbursements

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE COST

1. Subgrade Preparation 152,810 s.f $0.15 $22,921.50

2. Excavation 8,355 c.y. $12.50 $104,437.50

3. 6" HMA (Type A) 2,782 tons $66.00 $183,620.25

4. 17" Aggregate Base 3,893 c.y $30.00 $116,780.56

5. 5.5" Asphaltic Concrete Paving 1,997 tons $66.00 $131,806.81

6. 13" Aggregate Base 2,411 c.y. $30.00 $72,342.59

7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 3,152 l.f. $25.00 $78,800.00

8. Median Curb, Type 5 (6" Barrier Curb) 3,500 l.f. $15.00 $52,500.00

9. Handicap Ramp 16 ea $3,700.00 $59,200.00

10. Median Pedestrian Refuge 545 s.f. $6.00 $3,270.00

11. 7' Sidewalk 980 s.f $10.00 $9,800.00

12. Median Landscaping 16,030 s.f. $5.57 $89,303.17

13. Cobble Fill 1,760 s.f. $5.00 $8,800.00

14. Signing & Striping 11,000 l.f. $6.39 $70,338.03

15. Erosion Control 152,810 s.f. $0.10 $15,281.00

16. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 8 ea $6,000.00 $48,000.00

17. Traffic Signal 1 ea $320,000.00 $320,000.00

18. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1,800 l.f. $57.00 $102,600.00 Subtotal $1,489,801.41
30% (surveys, design, inspection and contingency) $446,940.42 Grand Total $1,936,741.84
Preliminary Cost Per Each
6 x 4 Intersection
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-14 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 566 of 1447 ends

Table F-9
Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Implementation Plan - Elliott Homes, Inc.

White Rock Road - Aerojet Portion Drainage Costs
Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Credit Amount 1 24" Pipe LF 500.0 $ 185.00 $ 92,500.00
2 Drain Inlet EA 2.0 $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00
3 Drain Inlet Laterals LF 70.0 $ 90.00 $ 6,300.00
4 Manhole (Assume 60") EA 1.0 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00
$ 227.60
Item No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Credit Amount 1 City Drainage Reimbursement LF 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
$ 15.59
$ 115.59

1. Based on Rancho Cordova Fee Program 2013 Update & WRR Phase 1 Teichert bids FOOTNOTES:

TOTAL DRAINAGE COST PER 500 LF

LF COST

REIMBURSABLE DRAINAGE CREDITS PER LF (CITY COST)
COST ESCALATION TO 2020 (15.59% INCREASE)

LF DRAINAGE CREDIT
202007 m2 appendices 02-23-22 2/24/2022
F-15 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 567 of 1447 ends

Exhibit F-1 ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 568 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 13

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 10.3.

DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: GODDARD SCHOOL – TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP & MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW – PROJECT NO. PLND-0921-0008 & PLND-1121-0018 – LOCATED AT 3370 ZINFANDEL DRIVE; APN: 072-2360-041-0000
PROPERTY OWNER:

Rancho Cordova Retirement Residence, LP
Hawthorn Construction Group, LLC
2260 McGilchrist Street SE
Salem, OR 97302
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

WSEE Holding LLC
1601 Merkley Ave, #1350
West Sacramento, CA 95691
PROJECT: Goddard School TPM & DR
FILE: PLND-0921-0008 & PLND-1121-0018
LOCATION: 3370 Zinfandel Drive
APN: 072-2360-041-0000
PLANNER: Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner

RECOMMENDATION
Determine the project exempt per Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) and Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines; and Adopt the Resolution for a Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would determine the project exempt from further CEQA analysis and approve the Applicant’s request to subdivide the property into 2 separate parcels (Parcel A & Parcel B) and would also allow for the construction of the Goddard School building and layout as proposed within the project plans.

BACKGROUND
The project site is an existing 4.281-acre property located at 3370 Zinfandel Drive and zoned Business and Professional Office (BP) within the Zinfandel Special Planning Area (ZSPA). The ZSPA was originally approved by Sacramento County on August 7, 2002 and was intended to permit infill development in a manner consistent with the General Plan that allows for mixed land use development including residential, industrial, office, commercial, public/quasi-public, and

Page 569 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 13
recreational uses. Since the ZSPA was approved in 2002 under the Sacramento County Zoning Code, this code continues to be applicable when processing applications within the Special Planning Area.

Figure 1: Project Location

PROJECT DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS
The Applicant has submitted two separate applications for the Goddard School project. These two applications have been combined and presented to City Council as one project to better portray the overall development. This project would be a re-location of their existing school located at 10710 Bear Hollow Drive (See Figure 2). Both applications have been reviewed by Staff and the analysis for each entitlement is provided below. No use permit is required with this application as the Goddard School caters to preschool and daycare services which is categorized as a commercial child day care facility which is allowed by right in this zoning designation.

Page 570 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 13
Figure 2: Goddard Relocation

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
The first application was received on September 19, 2021, for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a +/-4.281 acre parcel into two separate parcels to separate the future Goddard School site from the adjacent vacant property. The proposed map shows the existing parcel (072-2360- 041-0000) split into Parcel A at 1.500 acres and Parcel B at 2.781 acres. The future +/-10,457 SF Goddard School is proposed to be located on Parcel A while Parcel B is to remain vacant at this time (See Figure 2). The applicant has also provided an Access Agreement between Parcel A and the adjacent parcel to the northwest that is currently used as additional parking for the Blue Shield of California building across the bike trail.

Existing Goddard School Location
Proposed Goddard School Location

Page 571 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 13
Figure 2: Proposed Tentative Parcel Map
Surrounding Uses
The Goddard School will be located along Zinfandel Drive just north of Bear Hollow Drive. The project site is surrounded by the following uses.

Table 1: Surrounding Designations and Existing Uses
Location Existing Use
General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation
Subject Site Undeveloped lot
Office Mixed Use
(OMU)
Business Professional Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (BP ZSPA)
North
Blue Shield Overflow
Parking Lot
Office Mixed Use
(OMU)
Business Professional Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (BP ZSPA)
East
Single Family
Residential Subdivision
Low Density
Residential (LDR)
Low Density Zinfandel Special
Planning Area (LD ZSPA)
South Stone Creek Village
Commercial Mixed
Use (CMU)
Regional Commercial Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (RC ZSPA)
West
Rancho Cordova
Retirement Facility
Office Mixed Use
(OMU)
Business Professional Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (BP ZSPA)

Page 572 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 13
Figure 3: Surrounding Uses Aerial Map
The two projects shown adjacent to the project site have not yet bet constructed. The Rancho Cordova Retirement Facility was approved in December of 2019 and is anticipated to start construction in Spring 2022. Stone Creek Village was approved October 18, 2021 and the commercial aspect of the project, which includes the Sprouts grocery store, is currently under construction.

Required permits and Regulatory Basis
According to the State Subdivision Map Act and Municipal Code, a parcel may be subdivided into multiple separate lots with a Parcel Map, guided by the following provisions:

1. Subdivision Map Act

2. RCMC Title 22, Land Development, provides the local authority under the Subdivision Map Act to subdivide land.

3. RCMC Title 23, Zoning
Title 22 - Land Development: Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code regulates land division and is intended to supplement and implement the Subdivision Map Act. The proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with requirements and procedures of a tentative parcel map application.

Stone Creek
Village
(Sprouts)
Rancho
Cordova
Retirement
Facility
Proposed Goddard School Location

Page 573 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 13

FINDINGS & EVIDENCE
Section 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act requires a City to deny approval of a tentative map, if any of the following findings are found to be true. In the case of the proposed map, none of the required findings were found to be true. The following evidence supports the map request:

A. Finding: That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

Evidence: The proposed Tentative Parcel Maps is consistent with both the General Plan and the Zinfandel Special Planning Area (ZSPA). The site is listed as Office Mixed Use (OMU) within the City’s General Plan which encourages the integration commercial and/or residential use in conjunction with office use of a site. The ZSPA zoning designation is Business and Professional Office (BP). The proposed map will not affect the existing zoning designations of the two parcels and both parcels will continue to be consistent with the minimum lot sizes required for BP zoning as required by the 2003 Sacramento County Zoning Code.

B. Finding: That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

Evidence: The design of the map is consistent with applicable OMU standards of the General Plan and the BP zoning of the Zinfandel Special Planning Area. The anticipated future development of the Goddard School within Parcel A of the project and the adjacent single-family homes, maintains the office mixed-use development that was intended by this zone and general plan designation.

C. Finding: That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable to subdivide. The existing +/-4.281-acre parcel will be split into two separate lots, Parcel A and Parcel B, however the resulting lots will continue to be consistent with required development standards for the BP zoning designation. Each new parcel will be supported by cross-lot access easement that allows access between parcels as well as to Zinfandel Drive that is recorded by the County. Both parcels will also have access to adequate utilities for future development. The map has also been conditioned to have reciprocal parking and access agreements between parcels to maintain the seamless circulation and adequate parking as originally approved.

D. Finding: That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.

The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is dividing the existing parcel in to two separate parcels. The two new parcels will continue to meet the minimum lot size requirements for the BP zoning designation.

E. Finding: That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Evidence: The proposed design of the Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause any environmental damage. The site is currently undeveloped without any sensitive plant

Page 574 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 13
and/or wildlife. The Tentative Parcel Map is only to subdivide the existing parcel into two separate parcels and will not affect the use or zoning of the parcels. Therefore, project will continue to be consistent with the approved EIR for the Zinfandel Special Planning Area and can be found exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines.

F. Finding: That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

Evidence: The subdivision of one parcel into two separate parcels would not cause any serious public health problems. The ingress from Zinfandel Drive to the new parcels is already existing and the overall project has been reviewed by Staff for any concerns regarding traffic. The subdivision would allow Goddard School to obtain Parcel A for the development of their building would not result in any future public health issues.

G. Finding: That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the legislative body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.

Evidence: No change is proposed with this subdivision and a condition has been placed on the project to note on the map that reciprocal access and parking between parcels shown hereon shall be granted/reserved prior to the sale and/or reconveyance of said parcels. All necessary easement have been required to be shown on the map for future development of the parcels.

MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW
The second application was received on November 12, 2021, for a Major Design Review for the construction of a new +/-10,457 SF single level building with 10 classrooms, multi-purpose room, administrative offices, a warming kitchen, approximately 11,100 SF of outdoor playground area, parking lot and trash enclosures. This new construction would be a re-location of the existing Goddard School currently located 10710 Bear Hollow Drive. The project site plan and circulation has also been reviewed as part of this design review.

Site Design
The proposed Goddard School is located along Zinfandel Drive with a right in, right out direct access entrance that is shared with the adjacent Blue Shield of California parking lot. The Applicant has also included a direct pedestrian connection from Zinfandel Drive to the main entrance of the facility. The Applicant worked directly with the Public Works Department providing a Trip Generation Memorandum that determined that given the existing school is already located less than ½ mile away, no new traffic flow would be generated from the proposed new facility and therefore no additional traffic study or analysis was necessary for the allowed use.

The proposed parking lot also provides adequate parking spaces on-site. The facility requires 1 space per employee (total of 22 employees) and 1 space for every 8 persons at facility capacity (168 children) which is a total of 43 required parking spaces. The proposed site design provides 48 spaces which is more than adequate parking for the facility.

Page 575 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 13
The project site will be including wrought iron fencing surrounding a portion of the property. The proposed fencing will be 6’ in height and will surround the outdoor play area as well as the sides of the buildings to enclose the classroom exits. The wrought iron material was chosen to allow visibility through the fence for staff to see on the other side of the fence for any potential danger (See Figure 3 in Green). A 4’ wrought iron fence will also be installed internally to bisect the playground area into separate areas for different age levels.

As an added safety measure to the property, the Applicant has included Traffic Guard bollards that have been tested for low impact vehicle protection. Bollards will be included on the north and west sides of the building along the parking areas (See Figure 3 in Red). Bollards have not been included along Zinfandel Drive as these bollards are only intended to protect the building at parking lot speeds. However, the site plan includes a row of trees along Zinfandel Drive that not only provided shade for pedestrians but also a layer of protection from vehicles traveling along Zinfandel Drive.

Figure 4: Goddard School Site Plan
Building Design
The applicant has included architectural elevations with their submittal. The building is proposed to be a flat roof building with parapet walls designed to screen any roof-mounted mechanical equipment as required by the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code. A tower element was added to the front main entrance to highlight the entry while also providing a variation in roofline for added visual interest. The design includes a variety of exterior finishes such as

Page 576 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 13
stone veneer, steel awnings, metal roofing, and cornices for added detail (See Figures 5-8 for building elevations)
Figure 5: North Elevation facing Blue Shield Parking Lot Figure 6: East Elevation Facing Zinfandel Drive
Figure 7: West Elevation facing future Retirement Facility Figure 8: South Elevation facing playground area and vacant parcel

Page 577 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 10 of 13
Site Landscaping
As part of the submitted project plans, the Applicant has provided preliminary landscape plans for the project site. The preliminary plans include landscape surrounding the entire property boundary with a significant amount of landscaping along Zinfandel Drive and a stormwater basin at the north end of the property. The plant schedule for the site includes a colorful and functional variety of trees, shrubs and groundcover that will enhance the visual aesthetic of the property while also serving as a barrier along Zinfandel Drive and as a natural filtration system for the stormwater basin. The plan includes trees that provide the minimum 50% shading requirement for parking areas as well as shrubs along the property boundaries that also soften the look of the 6’ wrought iron security fencing surrounding the property making the site more inviting and compatible with the future adjacent retirement facility and the surrounding singlefamily homes (See Figure 9). Additional details regarding the landscaping of the site, including plant species and size, can be seen in the project plans (Attachment 2).

Figure 18: Preliminary Landscape Plan

DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS & EVIDENCE
Approval of the Major Design Review, subject to the Design Review Package (Attachment 2) and the Conditions of Approval (Attachment 3) must provide sufficient evidence for the Findings required by Zoning Code Section 23.141.070. Findings and supportive evidence are shown below:

A. Finding: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, complies with applicable zoning regulations, Specific Plan provisions, and special

Page 578 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 11 of 13
planning area provisions, and is consistent with the applicable Rancho Cordova Design Guidelines.

Evidence: The proposed Goddard School is located within a Office Mixed Use (OMU) designation within the City’s General Plan. The OMU designation encourages the integration of commercial and office with residential uses. The project is also located within the Business and Professional Office use (BP) zone of the Zinfandel Special Planning Area (ZSPA). The Goddard School is considered a child day care facility and this use in conjunction with the surrounding single-family homes in the area, is consistent with the mixed-use objectives of both the General Plan and ZSPA. The building has been proposed directly along Zinfandel Drive with significant landscaping allowing the building to be the focus of the site with parking areas minimized in visibility, which is consistent with the efforts of the City’s Design Guidelines.

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The proposed facility will be a child day care facility for children ages 6 weeks to 6 years old. The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape is suitable as it provides an inviting building, softened with a variety of landscaping, as well as easy access from Zinfandel Drive for parents to drop off/pick up their children. The construction of the facility with the additional landscaping will enhance the character of the neighborhood and the community by developing the site which currently lays vacant along Zinfandel Drive.

C. Finding: The architecture, including the character, scale, and quality of the design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of existing or anticipated buildings on adjoining and nearby properties.

Evidence: The project design has considered the surrounding homes as well as the future retirement facility proposed on the adjacent parcel in order to provide a compatible design concept for the area. The project includes a soft main body color with brown accent colors and stone veneer as well as awnings and a pitched roof at the entry that is consistent both with homes in the area as well as the future Sprouts shopping center currently under construction across Bear Hollow Drive.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Evidence: The Applicant worked with the Public Works Department regarding traffic analysis and provided a Trip Generation Memorandum for the operation of the facility.

This facility is a relocation of an existing facility that is less than ½ mile away. Given the results of the Trip Generation Memorandum and the proximity of the existing facility, it was determined that there would not be a significant increase in traffic in the area and that no further traffic analysis was necessary for the allowed use. In addition, the Applicant has provided direct pedestrian access to the public right of way as well as adequate parking on-site.

Page 579 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 12 of 13

GENERAL PLAN
The project site is located within the Office Mixed Use (OMU) designation of the City’s General Plan. The OMU designation encourages the integration of commercial and/or residential use in conjunction with office use of a site. The Goddard School is considered a commercial child care facility however the use is compatible with the office use to the north, the surrounding singlefamily homes in the area and the future development of the retirement facility on the adjacent parcel.

ZONING CODE
The project is located within the Zinfandel Special Planning Area (ZSPA) and is zoned Business and Professional Office (BP) which is consistent with the OMU designation of the General Plan.

The BP zone refers to the allowable uses and standards provided within the commercial land use table within the Sacramento County Zoning Code. The use is allowed by right within this zone and the project has been constructed consistent with the development standards required by the Sacramento County Code.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff anticipates that the project will have a positive fiscal impact due to the short term and longterm positions for the construction and operation of the childcare facility. The development of building and the property from vacant land to a business will also provide an additional positive impact through the increase in property taxes on the site as well as within the surrounding area.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Tentative Parcel Map associated with the Goddard School would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15315. This exempts from CEQA projects that involve the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. The Goddard School Tentative Parcel Map involves dividing an existing 3.37- acre parcel into two separate parcels of Parcel 1 (1.5 acres) and Parcel 2 (1.87 acres). As this Tentative Subdivision Map divides property located in an existing urban area into two parcels, is in conformance with the General Plan, including the Zinfandel Special Planning Area, and zoning, requires no variances or exceptions, has available all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards, and the parcel has not been involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, it is exempt from CEQA review. The project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.

The Major Design Review associated with the Goddard School would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183. This exempts from CEQA projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The Goddard School Major Design Review involves development of a 10,457 square foot single level building with 10 classrooms along with outdoor playground areas, parking lot, and a trash enclosure located within the Villages of Zinfandel

Page 580 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 13 of 13
Special Planning Area. Approximately 11,100 square feet of playground space will be constructed in two separate playground areas. The development also includes landscaping and drainage improvements. The business park site was identified in the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area EIR. As this Major Design Review is consistent with the Special Plan and the environmental documentation prepared for the Special Plan, it is exempt from CEQA review.

So long as the project does not have any project-specific significant effects peculiar to the Major Design Review and not identified in the previous environmental documentation, the project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.

RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council find the project to be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15315 Minor Land Divisions and 15183 Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning and adopt the resolution approving the Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review for the Goddard School (PLND-0921-0008 & PLND-1121-0018), subject to the findings, Project Plans (Attachment 2) and Conditions of Approval (Attachment 3).

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Project Plans

3. Exhibit B to the Resolution - Conditions of Approval

4. 500’ Radius Map and Labels

Page 581 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 5

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL PROJECT NO. PLND-0921-0008 AND PLND-1121- 0018
WHEREAS, WSEE Holding LLC, (hereinafter referred to as Applicant) filed two separate applications for a Tentative Parcel Map and a Major Design Review approval for the Goddard School project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the appropriate authority to hear and take action on this project; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located at 3370 Zinfandel Drive and includes a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the existing +/-4.281-acre parcel into two parcels, Parcel A at 1.5 acres and Parcel B at +/-2.781-acres; and
WHEREAS, the project also includes a Major Design Review for a new +/-10,457 SF single level building with outdoor playground areas and parking lot improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova has conducted a properly noticed public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented during the hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The CEQA exemption found in California Code of Regulation Title 14, Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) and Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning) are adequate exemptions according to the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act.

A. Finding: The project has been analyzed and is exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15315 “Minor Land Divisions” and Section 15183 “Projects Consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning”.

Evidence: The Tentative Parcel Map associated with the Goddard School would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15315. This exempts from CEQA projects that involve the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. The Goddard School Tentative Parcel Map involves dividing an existing 3.37-acre parcel into two separate parcels of Parcel 1 (1.5 acres) and Parcel 2 (1.87 acres). As this Tentative Subdivision Map divides property located in an existing urban area into two parcels, is in conformance with the General Plan, including the Zinfandel Special Planning Area, and zoning, requires no variances or exceptions, has available all services and access to the

Page 582 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 5
proposed parcels to local standards, and the parcel has not been involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, it is exempt from CEQA review. The project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.

The Major Design Review associated with the Goddard School would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183. This exempts from CEQA projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are projectspecific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The Goddard School Major Design Review involves development of a 10,457 square foot single level building with 10 classrooms along with outdoor playground areas, parking lot, and a trash enclosure located within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area.

Approximately 11,100 square feet of playground space will be constructed in two separate playground areas. The development also includes landscaping and drainage improvements. The business park site was identified in the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area EIR. As this Major Design Review is consistent with the Special Plan and the environmental documentation prepared for the Special Plan, it is exempt from CEQA review. So long as the project does not have any project-specific significant effects peculiar to the Major Design Review and not identified in the previous environmental documentation, the project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.

2. Section 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act requires a City to deny approval of a tentative map, if any of the following findings are found to be true. In the case of the proposed map, none of the required findings were found to be true. The following evidence supports the map request:

A. Finding: That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

B. Finding: That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

C. Finding: That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

Page 583 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 5
Evidence: The site is physically suitable to subdivide. The existing +/-4.281-acre parcel will be split into two separate lots, Parcel A and Parcel B, however the resulting lots will continue to be consistent with required development standards for the BP zoning designation. Each new parcel will be supported by cross-lot access easement that allows access between parcels as well as to Zinfandel Drive that is recorded by the County. Both parcels will also have access to adequate utilities for future development.

The map has also been conditioned to have reciprocal parking and access agreements between parcels to maintain the seamless circulation and adequate parking as originally approved.

D. Finding: That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.

Evidence: The proposed design of the Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause any environmental damage. The site is currently undeveloped without any sensitive plant and/or wildlife. The Tentative Parcel Map is only to subdivide the existing parcel into two separate parcels and will not affect the use or zoning of the parcels. Therefore, project will continue to be consistent with the approved EIR for the Zinfandel Special Planning Area and can be found exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines.

F. Finding: That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

Page 584 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 4 of 5

3. Approval of the Major Design Review, subject to the Design Review Package (Exhibit A) and the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B) must provide sufficient evidence for the Findings required by Zoning Code Section 23.141.070. Findings and supportive evidence are shown below:

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Evidence: The Applicant worked with the Public Works Department regarding traffic analysis and provided a Trip Generation Memorandum for the operation of the facility.

This facility is a relocation of an existing facility that is less than ½ mile away. Given the

Page 585 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 5 of 5
results of the Trip Generation Memorandum and the proximity of the existing facility, it was determined that there would not be a significant increase in traffic in the area and that no further traffic analysis was necessary for the allowed use. In addition, the Applicant has provided direct pedestrian access to the public right of way as well as adequate parking on-site.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st day of March, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 586 of 1447 ends

A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC : 760-217-5449 : Yucaipa, CA Project Description – Proposed Goddard School
Property information
Address: 3370 Zinfandel Dr. Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
APN – 072-2360-041-0000
Application – Major Design Review Application
Applicant
WSEE Holding LLC
1601 Merkley Ave #1350
West Sacramento
Owner’s Representative
Andrew Hinman
A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC
m: 760.217.5449
[email protected]
Project Background
The applicant currently operates the Goddard School in Rancho Cordova, CA and will be moving into this new Goddard school to own and operate.

The Goddard School is a franchised early childhood development center. The franchisor of The Goddard School is Goddard Systems, Inc. (GSI).

Goddard Systems Inc.

GSI, the franchisor of The Goddard School, has more than 550 locations in 37 states and has been in business since 1988. There are currently 14 centers either open or in development in California. The Goddard School core curriculum emphasizes early childhood development and incorporates enrichment programs in chess, coding, fitness, foreign languages, music, robotics, sign languages, yoga and more. The Goddard School Franchise is consistently named one of the top childcare franchises in the United States by Entrepreneur magazine.

A key factor that sets The Goddard School apart from other franchise system childcare centers is that they require there to be an “owner-on-site.” Other franchises will sell multiple licenses to a franchisee and let them have an onsite manager. Requiring an “owner-on-site” is an inherently better model as the business is being managed by the actual owner rather than a paid employee. Additional licenses will not be sold to the franchisee unless their business meets the high-quality brand standards of the franchise.

Site Selection
The following factors are the reason that the Goddard School franchise has identified this as an excellent site for one of their locations.
• Commercial location close to a high density of residential. • Excellent demographics for families with children under the age 5.

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 587 of 1447 ends

A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC : 760-217-5449 : Yucaipa, CA • Close proximity to Zinfandel Dr., a major thoroughfare. • The use of childcare works in this location with no negative impacts to the neighboring properties as it’s a permitted use.

Proposed Use
The proposed building is +-10,442sf. The school is proposed to have 168 children from the ages of 6 weeks through 6 years old. If there is a demand for school age children for after-school that may be included in the school’s program. There will be 22 staff when the school is at full capacity. The floor plan is based on the GSI standards as well as CA childcare licensing regulations. Included in the interior space will be:
• Secured front entrance with biometrics entrance device for parents • 10 classrooms designed to meet the childcare requirements for the corresponding age group • Large multi-purpose room
• Owner’s and Director’s office
• Warming Kitchen with pantry for reheating lunches brought for the children by the parents. • Staff work room
• Adult restrooms
• Service rooms such as a janitor’s closet, IT closet, laundry and storage There is approximately +-11,100 square feet of playground space proposed. There will be 2 separate playgrounds areas. The playgrounds will have playground structures and are separated by age group as required by the state regulations.

The hours of operation for the center are from 7am – 6pm, Monday through Friday. The center will typically be closed on the weekends and holidays. On occasion evening or weekend events may be held at the school.

Events will be planned to accommodate the number of families that can be parked on site.

Building Elevations
The building is a flat roof building with parapet walls to screen the HVAC equipment. A tower element was added at the front entrance to define the entrance and allow for building signage. The parapet walls on the corner of the building were elevated to give the roof line greater interest.

The exterior finishes blend well together, are aesthetically pleasing and include stucco, stone veneer, steel awnings, standing seam metal roof and textured cornice around top of the parapet.

Site Design
The site is located south off Zinfandel Drive between International Drive and Bear Hollow Drive. The design of the site strategically utilizes all the property.

The building was situated on the site to create an adequate number of parking spaces along the building so that parents can park their car and enter the building without crossing a drive aisle.

A wrought iron fence is used around the playgrounds as well as the building to ensure that classroom exits are contained for safety and security. The one infant room door on the front of the building is not fenced but will be protected with delayed egress panic bars.

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 588 of 1447 ends

A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC : 760-217-5449 : Yucaipa, CA Parent Drop-off and Pick-up
Drop-off at the school would occur in the morning between 7:00 – 9:00 AM. Standard pick-up would be from 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM. Some children will leave earlier than 4:00 PM if they are registered as part-time. The student dropoff process includes parents parking their car, taking their children inside the facility to sign them in, and walking their children to their classroom. This entire process is expected to take 5-10 minutes.

For pick-up, parents must follow a similar process: park their car, pick their child up at their classroom, and sign the child out. Again, this process would take about 5-10 minutes. Student pick-ups are staggered between the hours of 4:00 – 6:00 PM, but about 20-30% of students will have already been picked up before this period because they are part-time.

Playgrounds
Below are photos of the standard GSI playgrounds. The playgrounds are appropriately designed for the corresponding age groups. They are designed with integral shade structures and a poured-in-place rubber safety surfacing to meet the fall zone requirements for state childcare licensing. They are designed in primary colors to be visually stimulating to children. The safety surfacing is a tan color to be resistant to fading due to ultraviolet light.

Preschool Playground
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 589 of 1447 ends

A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC : 760-217-5449 : Yucaipa, CA Infant/Toddler Playground
Fencing
Fencing is critical at a childcare center. Fencing is proposed around the playgrounds as well as the sides of the building to enclose the classroom exits. The proposed fencing is 6’ tall around the perimeter for security. The interior separator fencing is the same as the perimeter fencing but only 4’ tall. The fencing was chosen as one that you can see through for security. Rather than using a privacy fence, the wrought iron style fence was selected so that teachers can see the other side of the fence.

The fencing is made by Ameristar and is a powder coated steel fence with a lifetime warranty to reduce the maintenance to keep the fence looking attractive. It is designed with a flush top and bottom rail to be safe for children.

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 590 of 1447 ends

A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC : 760-217-5449 : Yucaipa, CA Car Protection
GSI has a requirement for car protection of their buildings. The measures have been put in place for the safety of the children. GSI specifies Traffic Guard bollards that have been tested to meet ASTM standard FM3016 for low impact vehicle protection. GSI requirements meet the most current standard to meet top quality safety standards.

Below is a picture of the Bollards. They can be made in any color. This photo is just for reference.

Bollards are shown on the north and west sides of the building along the parking areas. Bollards are used in these locations because they are meant to stop head on collisions at parking lot speeds.

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 591 of 1447 ends

A Hinman Construction and Consulting LLC : 760-217-5449 : Yucaipa, CA ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 592 of 1447 ends

BEAR HOLLOW DR VAN PARKING NO D D
ZINFANDEL DR GODDARD SCHOOL 3370 ZINFANDEL DR RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 © TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. XXXXX PREPARED FOR RANCHO CORDOVA C 87934
SCALE: 1" = 50'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 24"X36" NORTH
NOTES:

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ISSUED BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, TITLE NO. FSSE-FTO2000663-KD AMENDMENT F, DATED JULY 14, 2021 AND DEPICTS THE REAL PROPERTY AND PLOTTABLE EXCEPTIONS DESCRIBED THEREIN. EXCEPTIONS OTHER THAN EASEMENTS, SERVITUDES AND RIGHTS OF WAY, AS SPECIFIED IN THE 2021 MINIMUM

STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY AND ARE NOT REPRESENTED HEREON. EASEMENTS, SERVITUDES AND RIGHTS OF

WAY ARE DESIGNATED BELOW WITH THE CORRESPONDING NUMBER FROM THE EXCEPTIONS LISTED

IN SAID PRELIMINARY REPORT
EXCEPTIONS:

WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER (BLANKET IN NATURE).

AGREEMENT PER BOOK 20000824, PAGE 1286, O.R.S.C. (BLANKET IN NATURE).

AGREEMENT PER BOOK 20030404, PAGE 11, O.R.S.C. (BLANKET IN NATURE).

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PER BOOK 20030606, PAGE 877 AND BOOK 20070717, PAGE 1286, O.R.S.C. (BLANKET IN NATURE).

PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT PER BOOK 317 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 7 (PLOTTED).

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER BOOK 317 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 7 (PLOTTED).

CENTRALIZED MAIL DELIVERY EASEMENT PER BOOK 317 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 7 (PLOTTED).

NOTES, RECITALS, LEGENDS AND/OR CONDITIONS PER BOOK 317 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 7 (BLANKET IN NATURE).

AVIGATION EASEMENT PER BOOK 20050526, PAGE 184, O.R.S.C. (BLANKET IN NATURE).

PROPERTY LIMITATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS PER BOOK 20150310, PAGE 793, AND PARTIAL REVOCATION OF USE RESTRICTIONS PER INSTRUMENT NO. 202002260971, O.R.S.C. (BLANKET IN NATURE).

DECLARATION OF COVENANTS PER BOOK 20150728, PAGE 1355, O.R.S.C. (BLANKET IN NATURE).

NOTES, RECITALS, LEGENDS AND/OR CONDITIONS PER BOOK 226 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 3 (BLANKET IN NATURE).

DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENTS PER BOOK 20160330, PAGE 1232, O.R.S.C. (NOT ON SURVEYED PROPERTY).

DECLARATION OF ACCESS, FIRE ACCESS, UTILITY AND FIRE ACCESS ROADWAY MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS PER DOCUMENT# 202006010645, O.R.S.C. (PLOTTED).

EASEMENTS DELINEATED ON OR OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON BOOK 241 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 5 (EASEMENTS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ARE NOT ON THE SURVEYED PROPERTY. SEE EXCEPTIONS 10a, 10b AND 10c FOR DELINEATED EASEMENTS).

EASEMENT FOR SEWER PER DOCUMENT# 202008051516, O.R.S.C. (PLOTTED).

DECLARATION OF COVENANTS (DEVICE MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS) PER DOCUMENT# 202009291563, O.R.S.C. (DOES NOT AFFECT THE SURVEYED PROPERTY).

GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PER DOCUMENT# 202010201273, O.R.S.C. (NOT PLOTTABLE FROM RECORD INFORMATION).

NOTES, RECITALS, LEGENDS AND/OR CONDITIONS PER BOOK 241 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 5 (BLANKET IN NATURE).

BASIS OF BEARINGS:

THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS IDENTICAL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF ZINFANDEL DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON FINAL MAP NO. 95-0533.7 OF "VILLAGES OF ZINFANDEL UNIT NO. 9", FILED IN BOOK 317 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 7, BASED UPON FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON.

BENCHMARK:

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO BENCHMARK #22-051: RAMSET & 7/8" METAL DISC STAMPED "CO. B.M. 22-51" LOCATED IN TOP OF ROLL CURB ABOVE D.I. CENTER OF CURB RETURN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH WHITEROCK RD. & ROCKINGHAM DR. & 0.30+/- MILES EASTERLY OF MATHER FIELD RD.

ELEV=91.32 (NAVD88).

ADDRESS:
3370 ZINFANDEL DRIVE, RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670.

FLOOD ZONE:

ZONE X UNSHADED (AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD) PER THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 06067C0208H, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 16, 2012.

EXISTING LAND AREA:

4.281± ACRES (GROSS)

3.373± ACRES (NET - EXCLUDES PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT OF WAY)

THERE WAS NO OBSERVED EVIDENCE OF CURRENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING ADDITIONS WITHIN THE SURVEYED PROPERTY.

NOTE:

RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND PARKING BETWEEN PARCELS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE GRANTED/ RESERVED PRIOR TO THE SALE AND/ OR RECONVEYANCE OF SAID PARCELS.

LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE

EXISTING CONTOUR

EXISTING SEWER LINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE

PROPOSED CONTOUR

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE
PROPOSED 2" WATER LINE
PROPOSED 6" FIREWATER LINE
PROPOSED 6" SEWER LINE
PROPOSED 6' NON TRAFFIC RATED FENCE

PROPOSED EASEMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

THE SURVEYED PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL ONE:

PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2020-004-01, FILED JUNE 8, 2020 IN BOOK 241 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 5, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS.

RESERVING THEREFROM A NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT AND A NON-EXCLUSIVE UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2020-004-01, FILED JUNE 8, 2020 IN BOOK 241 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 5,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN

DECLARATION OF ACCESS, FIRE ACCESS, UTILITY AND FIRE ACCESS ROADWAY MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, RECORDED JUNE 1, 2020, BOOK 20200601, PAGE 645, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PARCEL TWO:

A NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT AND A NON-EXCLUSIVE UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT BOTH ON, OVER AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2020-004-01, FILED JUNE 8, 2020 IN BOOK 241 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 5, SACRAMENTO

COUNTY RECORDS, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DECLARATION OF

ACCESS, FIRE ACCESS, UTILITY AND FIRE ACCESS ROADWAY MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, RECORDED JUNE 1, 2020, BOOK 20200601, PAGE 645, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

APN: 072-2360-041-0000

ZONE SUMMARY
EXISTING PARCEL: 1
CURRENT ZONE: BP (ZSPA)
CURRENT OWNER: RANCHO CORDOVA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE L P
CURRENT USAGE: VACANT
EXISTING PARCEL: 2
CURRENT ZONE: BP (ZSPA)
CURRENT OWNER: RANCHO CORDOVA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE L P
CURRENT USAGE: VACANT

LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 N85°24'48"E 55.91'
L2 S43°45'09"E 3.19'
L3 S46°14'51"W 89.42'

CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH
C1 63.50' 44°12'19" 48.99'
C2 800.00' 6°54'38" 96.49'
C3 800.50' 1°28'09" 20.51'
L4 N50°39'46"W 55.17'
L5 N40°36'39"E 58.42'
L6 S39°20'14"W 22.63'

BUILDING SETBACKS

FRONT BUILDING SETBACK
25'
10' LANDSCAPE AREA
INTERIOR SIDE 20'
STREET SIDE 25'
REAR SIDE 25'
L7 N49°11'37"W 60.00'
TPM 1.0
PROPOSED PARCEL: A
CURRENT ZONE: BP (ZSPA)
PROPOSED OWNER: WSEE HOLDING LLC
PROPOSED USAGE: EDUCATION
PROPOSED PARCEL: B
CURRENT ZONE: BP (ZSPA)
CURRENT OWNER: RANCHO CORDOVA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE L P
PROPOSED USAGE: VACANT

MAP PREPARED BY
JACOB GLAZE, P.E.

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
(714) 786-6297
BY:_______________________________________
JACOB GLAZE, P.E. R.C.E.# 87934 DATE
1/18/2022

LAND OWNER

RANCHO CORDOVA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE L P
2260 MCGILCHRIST ST
SALEM, OR 97302

SURVEYOR
JOHN E. KLAMM L.S.

TSD ENGINEERING, INC.
785 ORCHARD DRIVE, SUITE #110
FOLSOM, CA 95630

APPLICANT

BILL PU

WSEE HOLDING LLC
1601 MERKLEY AVENUE #1350
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691
WATER DISTRICT:

GOLDEN STATE WATER

COMPANY
SEWER DISTRICT:

SACRAMENTO AREA SEWER

DISTRICT
FIRE DISTRICT:

SACRAMENTO

METROPOLITAN FIRE

DISTRICT

TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. XXX-XXX
A.P. NO.: XXX-XXX-X
JANUARY 2022

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

EARTHWORK QUANTITIES
CUT: 650.0 CY
FILL : 3,000.0 CY
NET: 2,350.0 CY (FILL)

DRAINAGE AREA

1.500 AC

LOT SUMMARY
EXISTING PARCEL: 1
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 186,464 SF

TOTAL NET AREA (EXCLUDES PUBLIC
R.O.W.): 146,928 SF
LAND USE: VACANT
EXISTING PARCEL: 2
TOTAL AREA: 239,101 SF
LAND USE: VACANT
PROPOSED PARCEL A:

TOTAL AREA: 65,310 SF
LAND USE: BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL
PROPOSED PARCEL B:

TOTAL AREA: 121,159 SF
LAND USE: VACANT
LINE TABLE: CURVE TABLE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT:

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT
ZONING DISTRICT:

BP (ZSPA) BUSINESS AND

PROFESSIONAL OFFICE,

ZINFANDEL SPECIAL

PLANNING AREA
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 593 of 1447 ends

VAN

PARKING NO
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 594 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 595 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 596 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 597 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 598 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 599 of 1447 ends

VAN

PARKING
NO ZIFANDEL DRIVE CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG C 87934 DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 SITE PLAN C1.0 2 LEGEND SITE CONSTRUCTION NOTES NORTH ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 600 of 1447 ends

3 SITE DETAILS 1 C1.1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING 3 ACCESSIBLE RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN TRUNCATED DOMES 1 CONCRETE CURB NON-TRAFFIC RATED FENCE 11 7 10 9 POUR-IN PLACE PLAY SURFACING HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION 2 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION 6 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4 THICKENED EDGE DETAIL 5 8 12 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG C 87934 DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 601 of 1447 ends

CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG C 87934 DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 7 SITE DETAILS 2 C1.2 1 HANDRAILS ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 602 of 1447 ends

VAN

PARKING
NO D ZIFANDEL DRIVE CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG C 87934 DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C2.0 4 KEY NOTES GRADING LEGEND NORTH ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 603 of 1447 ends

D D
VAN

PARKING

NO ZIFANDEL DRIVE
BEAR HALLOW DRIVE CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG C 87934 DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 UTILITY PLAN C3.0 5 LEGEND NOTE SANITARY SEWER NOTES DOMESTIC WATER NOTES NORTH FIRE WATER NOTES IRRIGATION NOTES ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 604 of 1447 ends

D
VAN

PARKING
NO ZINFANDEL DR. TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT HEIGHT/SPREAD CAL. WUCOLS SIZE AT MATURITY 4 PLATANUS RACEMOSA / CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX 10-12` HT. X 4-5` SPR. 2" CAL. LOW 40` HT. X 25` SPR. 6 PRUNUS MUME / JAPANESE FLOWERING APRICOT 24" BOX 8`-10` HT. X 3`-4` SPR. 1.5" CAL. MODERATE 30` HT. X 30` SPR. 6 QUERCUS LOBATA / VALLEY OAK 15 GAL. 7`-8` HT. X 4`-5` SPR, 1" CAL. LOW 40` HT. X 25` SPR. 8 SAMBUCUS NIGRA CAERULEA / BLUE ELDERBERRY 15 GAL. 6-8` HT. X 2-3` SPR. 1" CAL. LOW 15` HT. X 10` SPR. 12 ULMUS PARVIFOLIA `TRUE GREEN` / TRUE GREEN LACEBARK ELM 15 GAL. 7`-8` HT. X 2`-3` SPR. 1" CAL. MODERATE 30` HT. X 30` SPR. SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS SIZE 32 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' / KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS 5 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 3` HT. X 3` SPR. 70 CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' / LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 4` HT. X 4` SPR. 45 DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 2` HT. X 4` SPR. 53 EUONYMUS JAPONICUS 'GREEN SPIRE' / GREEN SPIRE EUONYMUS 5 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 6` HT. X 4` SPR. 24 LOROPETALUM CHINENSE RUBRUM 'PURPLE MAJESTY' / PURPLE MAJESTY FRINGE FLOWER 5 GAL. 48" O.C. MODERATE 6` HT. X 4` SPR. 42 MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 'LENCA' TM / REGAL MIST PINK MUHLY GRASS 5 GAL. 48" O.C. LOW 4` HT. X 4` SPR. 60 RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'SOUTHERN MOON' / SOUTHERN MOON YEDDA HAWTHORN 5 GAL. 72" O.C. LOW 5` HT. X 6` SPR. 118 SALVIA CHAMAEDRYOIDES / MEXICAN BLUE SAGE 5 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 2` HT. X 3` SPR. GROUND COVERS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS 187 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS X 'EMERALD CARPET' / EMERALD CARPET MANZANITA 1 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW 32 DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'LITTLE REV' / LITTLE REV FLAX LILY 1 GAL. 24" O.C. LOW 175 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE' TM / BREEZE MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 30" O.C. LOW 41 TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS 'PROSTRATUM' / PROSTRATE GERMANDER 1 GAL. 36" O.C. LOW SOD QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS 3,567 SF NATIVE MOW FREE FESCUE BLEND SOD MODERATE PLANT SCHEDULE 155 LF 6" MOW CURB CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 COREY CAMERON P.L.A No. 6625 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 07-31-22 LDLDCC PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 6 NORTH LANDSCAPE NOTE: THE SELECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS BASED ON CLIMATIC, AESTHETIC, AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITH APPROPRIATE SOIL AMENDMENTS, FERTILIZERS AND APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTS BASED UPON A SOILS REPORT FROM AN AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN FROM THE SITE. DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL FILL IN BETWEEN SHRUBS TO SHIELD THE SOIL FROM THE SUN, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION, AND RUN-OFF. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A 3" DEPTH TO HELP CONSERVE WATER, LOWER SOIL TEMPERATURE, AND REDUCE WEED GROWTH. THE SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO GROW IN THEIR NATURAL FORMS. ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA MUNICIPAL CODE. IRRIGATION NOTE: AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE 100% COVERAGE FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE WATER SUPPLY FOR THIS SITE IS A POTABLE WATER CONNECTION AND A DEDICATED IRRIGATION METER WILL BE PROVIDED. LOW VOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLANT GROWTH WITH NO WATER LOSS DUE TO WATER CONTROLLERS, AND OTHER NECESSARY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL POINT SOURCE SYSTEM SHALL BE ADEQUATELY FILTERED AND REGULATED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED DESIGN PARAMETERS. ALL IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA MUNICIPAL CODE. I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLAN. COREY R. CAMERON, LLA 6625 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TREE BOX SIZE NOTE: 25% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE 24% BOX OR LARGER. TOTAL TREES: 36 TREES TOTAL 24" BOX TREES: 10 (27%) TREE NOTE: 30% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE OF EVERGREEN SPECIES. TOTAL TREES: 36 TREES TOTAL EVERGREEN TREES: 12 (33%) ROOT BARRIER NOTE: ALL TREES WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE ARE TO RECEIVE ROOT CONTROL BARRIER. PRE-EMERGENT NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO APPLY PRE-EMERGENT IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPE PLANTERS AND TO INSTALL A WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL WOOD BARK MULCH AREAS. SITE LIGHT NOTE: ALL TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10' CLEAR BETWEEN CENTER OF TREE AND CENTER OF LIGHT POLE. Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 605 of 1447 ends

D
VAN

PARKING
NO 75% 25% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25% 75% 50% 25%25% 25% 25% 50% TREE 25% 50% 75% 100% TOTAL ULMUS PARVIFOLIA GRAND TOTAL (7) 240 SQFT (3) 481 SQFT (2) 721 SQFT - 4,565 SQFT 4,723 SQFT PRUNUS MUME (2) 79 SQFT - - - 158 SQFT PARKING LOT SHADE CANOPY TOTAL PARKING AREA = 7,717 SQFT 50% SHADE REQ. = 3,859 SQFT PROVIDED = 4,723 SQFT / 61% *TREE SHADE SHOWN AT 15 YEAR MATURITY ULMUS PARVIFOLIA = 35' DIA 25% = 241 SQFT 50% = 481 SQFT 75% = 722 SQFT 100% = 962 SQFT PRUNUS MUME = 20' DIA 25% = 79 SQFT 50% = 157 SQFT 75% = 236 SQFT 100% = 314 SQFT CALIFORNIA SHEETS DATE RANCHO CORDOVA IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET OF NO. REVISIONS BY APP DATE DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: © PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE GODDARD SCHOOL R.C.E. No. 87934 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 12-31-21 JACOB GLAZE DESIGN: AZ DATE: 11-09-21 DRAWN: MM CHECKED: JSG DATE: 11-09-21 DATE: 11-09-21 7 COREY CAMERON P.L.A No. 6625 REGISTRATION EXPIRES: 07-31-22 LDLDCC TREE SHADE PLAN L1.1 7 ZINFANDEL DRIVE NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 606 of 1447 ends

SV | Stone - El Dorado Stone
Style - Cliffstone
Color - Whitebark
P1 |
The Goddard School
Rancho Cordova, CA
P2 |
French White
DEW311
Brown Eyes
DE5265
P3 | Downing to Earth
DET634
Zinfandel Dr.

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 607 of 1447 ends

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 January 25, 2022
Bill Pu
WSEE Holding LLC
1601 Merkley Avenue #1350
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Subject: Trip Generation Memorandum for the Proposed Goddard School Project at 3370 Zinfandel Drive in the City of Rancho Cordova, California Dear Mr. Pu:

This memorandum has been prepared to evaluate the trip generating characteristics of the proposed Goddard School project located at 3370 Zinfandel Drive in the City of Rancho Cordova, California.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located at the southwest corner of Zinfandel Drive and Bear Hollow Drive in the City of Rancho Cordova. The existing site is currently vacant. The currently undeveloped parcel will be subdivided into 2 parcels, the westernmost of which will contain the proposed 1.5- acre Goddard School. The school has a projected enrollment of 168 students.

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
A trip generation analysis has been prepared to determine the net amount of traffic that would be generated by the proposed project.

Peak hour trips for the proposed Goddard School were determined based on data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Trip generation rates for Day Care Center (Land Use 565) were used in determining project trips.

Morning and evening peak hour trip generation estimates are summarized on Table 1. The project is estimated to generate 131 morning peak hour trips (69 inbound and 62 outbound) and 132 evening peak hour trips (62 inbound and 70 outbound).

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 608 of 1447 ends

Mr. Pu, January 25, 2022, Page 2
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 TABLE 1

SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Trip Generation Rates 1
ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Code Unit In Out Total In Out Total
Day Care Center 565 Students 0.413 0.367 0.78 0.371 0.419 0.79 Trip Generation Estimates
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Quantity Unit In Out Total In Out Total
Day Care Center 168 Students 69 62 131 62 70 132
1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 609 of 1447 ends

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714-939-1030

Page 1 ends

DRAINAGE MEMORANDUM
From: Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc.

Date: 1/19/2022
Subject: Goddard School – Rancho Cordova Rainwater Management Summary Existing Conditions
The existing site consists of vacant land that with natural land cover and low-lying plantings. It drains from the northwest to southeast corner of the parcel into a catch basin near Bear Hollow Road. The catch basin then outlets into a 24” Storm Drain line which ultimately connects in to the existing 24” Storm Drain line running south along Bear Hollow Road.

Proposed Conditions
The proposed project includes the addition of an approximately 11,500 SF early childhood education facility, associated parking to the west of the building and a play area to the east of the building.

Storm water runoff on the site is divided into two drainage areas.

Runoff from the first drainage area, consisting of the building and parking lot area, is directed into catch basins and conveyed via underground HDPE pipe into an infiltration basin located along the western property line. The infiltration basin has been sized to address the requirements for Sacramento County as outlined in the section below. An overflow connection has been provided from the basin which outlets to the southeast corner of the site.

The second drainage area, consisting of the play area, is directed into a vegetated swale along the eastern property line. The swale flows south where it flows into a catch basin that also connects into a pipe along the southeast corner of the site. From that point, water is conveyed via an underground pipe which ties into a catch basin near Bear Hollow Drive.

Water Quality and Quantity
The above ground bioretention basin was designed to capture and treat the storm water runoff based on the Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices (BMP) Design Manual as outlined in the 2018 Commercial LID Credits spreadsheet which has been attached for reference.

The rational method was used to analyze the 100-year event in accordance with the Sacramento Hydrology Manual. This was completed to calculate the peak discharges for the proposed project conditions. The combination of the soil and coverage type was used as the basis to calculate the soil loss rate. See attached documentation.

The Sacramento Hydrology Manual references the use of the Sacramento County Hydrologic Calculator program which implements the standards from the hydrology manual. The program was utilized to complete the hydrology analysis for the current study. The proposed site conditions were ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 610 of 1447 ends

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714-939-1030

Page 2 ends

inputted to perform the Sacramento County HEC-1 method with the Hydrologic Calculator which exports a 100-year, 24-hour hydrograph.

Utilizing the exported hydrograph information from the Sacramento Hydrologic calculator program to import into Bently’s PondPak program to analyze the ponding requirements for the site. The results of the PondPak program’s result are attached which shows a detainment volume for the system of 3,238 cubic feet. The basin shown on the plans is designed with a capacity of about 4,000 cubic feet to adequately detain the full volume from the analysis.

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 611 of 1447 ends

Sacramento Hydrologic Calculator Report
November 10, 2021 11:08
Project Title: Goddard School Method: Sacramento County HEC-1 method Comments: Date: 11/10/2021
Prepared by: RC
Watershed Hydrologic Summary Data
Watershed
Area
(acres)
Mean
Elevation
(ft)
Lag Times Basin "n" Loss Rates Percent Impervious
Method
Lag Time
(min) Method
Basin
"n" Method
Loss Rate
(in/hr) Method
Impervious
Area (%)
WS001 1.5 100 Travel Time - - - Computed - Specified 75 Travel Time Component Method Data for Lag Time Computation Watershed
Overflow Gutter Flow Channel and Pipe Flow
Land Use
Slope
(ft/ft)
Length
(ft)
Slope
(ft/ft)
Side
Slope
(ft/ft) Type
Length
(ft)
Slope
(ft/ft)
Width or
Diameter
(ft)
Design or
Flow (cfs)
Mannings
"n"
WS001 Commercial - 275 0.25 0.02:1 Pipe 185 .0176 0.67 0 0.01 Pipe 159 0.063 0.67 0 0.01
Infiltration Loss Rate Data
Watershed
Soil
Cover
Group
Land Use Impervious Area Percent
(% or acres)
95 90 85 80 75 70 60 50 40 30 25 20 15 10 5 2 1 1
*
WS001
B 100
C
D
Refer to the help file for Land Use Impervious Area Percent *Dense Oaks, Shrubs, Vines
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 612 of 1447 ends

Scenario Calculation Summary
Scenario Summary
ID 1
Label Base
Notes
Active Topology Base Active Topology
Hydrology Base Hydrology
Rainfall Runoff Base Rainfall Runoff
Physical Base Physical
Initial Condition Base Initial Condition
Boundary Condition Base Boundary Condition
Infiltration and Inflow Base Infiltration and Inflow
Output Base Output
User Data Extensions Base User Data Extensions
PondPack Engine Calculation Options Base Calculation Options Output Summary
Output Increment 3.000 min Duration 1,440.000 min
Rainfall Summary
Return Event Tag Rainfall Type (N/A)
Total Depth (N/A) in Storm Event (N/A)
Executive Summary (Nodes)
Maximum
Pond
Storage
(ft³)
Maximum
Water
Surface
Elevation
(ft)
Peak Flow
(ft³/s)
Time to
Peak
(min)
Hydrograph
Volume
(ft³)
Return Truncation
Event
(years)
Label Scenario
A Base 0 None 301.000 300.000 1.39 (N/A) (N/A)
Det-A (IN) Base 0 None 95,153.000 300.000 1.39 (N/A) (N/A) Det-A Base 0 None 88,887.000 1,365.000 1.34 99.657 3,238.000 (OUT)
Outfall A Base 0 None 88,887.000 1,365.000 1.34 (N/A) (N/A) Executive Summary (Links)
Node Flow
Direction
Peak Flow End Point
(ft³/s)
Peak Time
(min)
Hydrograph
Volume
(ft³)
Label Type Location
Outlet-A Pond Outlet Upstream 95,153.000 300.000 1.39 Det-A Pond Inflow Pond
Outflow
Outlet-A Pond Outlet Outflow 88,887.000 1,365.000 1.34 Det-A Outlet-A Pond Outlet Link 88,887.000 1,365.000 1.34
Outlet-A Pond Outlet Downstream 88,887.000 1,365.000 1.34 Outfall A Messages
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 1 of 2
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
11/10/2021
PondPack CONNECT Edition
[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
Goddard.ppc Center
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 613 of 1447 ends

Name of Drainage Shed: Fill in Blue Highlighted boxes
Location of project:

Step 1 - Open Space and Pervious Area Credits
Is your project within the drainage area of a common drainage plan that includes open space? If not, skip to 1 b. 1 a. Common Drainage Plan Area acres ACDP
Common Drainage Plan Open Space (Off-project) acres AOS a. Natural storage reservoirs and drainage corridors acres b. Buffer zones for natural water bodies acres
c. Natural areas including existing trees, other vegetation, and soil acres d. Common landscape area/park acres
e. Regional Flood Control/Drainage basins acres
1 b. Project Drainage Shed Area (Total) acres A
Project-Specific Open Space (In-project, communal**) acres APSOS a. Natural storage reservoirs and drainage corridors acres b. Buffer zones for natural water bodies acres
c. Natural areas including existing trees, other vegetation, and soil acres d. Landscape area/park acres
e. Flood Control/Drainage basins acres
** Doesn't include impervious areas within individual lots and surrounding individual units. That is accounted for below using Form D-1a in Step 2.

Area with Runoff Reduction Potential A - APSOS = acres AT Assumed Initial Impervious Fraction AT / A = I
Open Space & Pervious Area LID Credit (Step 1)
(AOS/ACDP+APSOS/A)x100 = pts
Step 2 - Runoff Reduction Credits
Runoff Reduction Treatments
Impervious
Area
Managed
Efficiency
Factor
Effective Area
Managed (AC)
Porous Pavement:

Option 1: Porous Pavement 0 acres x = 0.000 acres
(see Fact Sheet, excludes porous pavement used in Option 2) Option 2: Disconnected Pavement use Form D-2a for credits 0.00 acres (see Fact Sheet, excludes porous pavement used in Option 1) Landscaping used to Disconnect Pavement 0.0000 acres = 0.00 acres (see Fact Sheet)
Disconnected Roof Drains 0 acres = 0.00 acres
(see Fact Sheet and/or Table D-2b for summary of requirements) Ecoroof 0 acres = 0.00 acres
(see Fact Sheet)
Interceptor Trees use Form D-2b for credits 0.00 acres
(see Fact Sheet)
Total Effective Area Managed by Runoff Reduction Measures AC 0.00 acres Runoff Reduction Credit (Step 2) (AC / AT )*100 = 0 pts

1.09 27
Appendix D-2: Commercial Sites: Low Impact Development (LID) Credits and Treatment BMP Sizing Calculations Goddard Rancho Cordova
Sacramento

0.41 see area example
below
0 0
0 0
0 0

1.50 0.00

0.73 see area example
below

0.00 0.00

0.41 0.00
0 Commercial
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 614 of 1447 ends

Porous Pavement Type
Efficiency
Multiplier
Cobblestone Block Pavement 0.40 21 ft
Pervious Concrete/Asphalt 0.60 24 ft
Modular Block Pavement & 0.75 28 ft
Reinforced Grass Pavement 1.00 32 ft
Form D-2a: Disconnected Pavement Worksheet
See Fact Sheet for more information regarding Disconnected Pavement credit guidelines Effective Area Managed (A C)
Pavement Draining to Porous Pavement

2. Enter area draining onto Porous Pavement acres Box K1

3. Enter area of Receiving Porous Pavement acres Box K2 (excludes area entered in Step 2 under Porous Pavement)

4. Ratio of Areas (Box K1 / Box K2) Box K3

5. Select multiplier using ratio from Box K3 and enter into Box K4 Ratio (Box D) Multiplier
Ratio is ≤ 0.5 1.00
Ratio is > 0.5 and < 1.0 0.83 Box K4
Ratio is > 1.0 and < 1.5 0.71
Ratio is > 1.5 and < 2.0 0.55

6. Enter Efficiency of Porous Pavement (see table below) Box K5 Porous Pavement Type
Efficiency
Multiplier
Cobblestone Block Pavement 0.40
Pervious Concrete
Asphalt Pavement 0.60
Modular Block Pavement
Porous Gravel Pavement 0.75
Reinforced Grass Pavement 1.00

7. Multiply Box K2 by Box K5 and enter into Box K6 acres Box K6

8. Multiply Boxes K1,K4, and K5 and enter the result in Box K7 acres Box K7

9. Add Box K6 to Box K7 and multiply by 60%, and enter the Result in Box K8 acres This is the amount of area credit to enter into the "Disconnected Pavement" Box of Form D-2 Form D-2b: Interceptor Tree Worksheet
See Fact Sheet for more information regarding Interceptor Tree credit guidelines New Evergreen Trees

1. Enter number of new evergreen trees that qualify as Interceptor Trees in Box L1. trees Box L1

2. Multiply Box L1 by 200 and enter result in Box L2 sq. ft. Box L2 New Deciduous Trees

3. Enter number of new deciduous trees that qualify as Interceptor Trees in Box L3. trees Box L3

4. Multiply Box L3 by 100 and enter result in Box L4 sq. ft. Box L4 Existing Tree Canopy

5. Enter square footage of existing tree canopy that qualifies as Existing Tree canopy in Box L5. sq. ft. Box L5

6. Multiply Box L5 by 0.5 and enter the result in Box L6 sq. ft. Box L6 Total Interceptor Tree EAM Credits
Add Boxes L2, L4, and L6 and enter it into Box L7 sq. ft. Box L7 acres Box L8
This is the amount of area credit to enter into the "Interceptor Trees" Box of Form D-2 Table D-2a Table D-2b
≤ 3,500 sq ft

0.00 0.00

0.00 Minimum travel
distance
≤ 7,500 sq ft

0.00 0.00
1 ≤ 5,000 sq ft
≤ 10,000 sq ft

0.00 Maximum roof size

0.00 0
0 0
0 0
Divide Box L7 by 43,560 and multiply by 20% to get effective area managed and enter result in Box L8 Commercial
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 615 of 1447 ends

Step 3 - Runoff Management Credits
Capture and Use Credits
Impervious Area Managed by Rain barrels, Cisterns, and automatically-emptied systems (see Fact Sheet) - enter gallons, for simple rain barrels 0.00 acres Automated-Control Capture and Use System
(see Fact Sheet, then enter impervious area managed by the system) 0.00 acres Bioretention/Infiltration Credits
Impervious Area Managed by Bioretention BMPs Bioretention Area sq ft (see Fact Sheet) Subdrain Elevation inches
Ponding Depth, inches inches 0.00 acres
Impervious Area Managed by Infiltration BMPs
(see Fact Sheet) Drawdown Time, hrs 12 drawdown_hrs_inf Soil Infiltration Rate, in/hr 2.00 soil_inf_rate
Sizing Option 1: Capture Volume, acre-ft 0.00 capture_vol_inf 0.00 acres Sizing Option 2: Infiltration BMP surface area, sq ft 700 soil_surface_area 0.60 acres Basin or trench? approximate BMP depth 2.00 ft
Impervious Area Managed by Amended Soil or Mulch Beds
(see Fact Sheet) Mulched Infiltration Area, sq ft mulch_area 0.00 acres Total Effective Area Managed by Capture-and-Use/Bioretention/Infiltration BMPs 0.60 ALIDc Runoff Management Credit (Step 3) ALIDC/AT*200 = 109.9 pts Total LID Credits (Step 1+2+3) LID compliant, check for treatment sizing in Step 4 137.3 Adjusted Area for Flow-Based, Non-LID Treatment AT - AC -ALIDC = 0.49 AAT Adjusted Impervious Fraction of A for Volume-Based, Non-LID Treatment AAT / A = 0.33 IA

Further treatment is required, see choose flow-based or volume-based sizing in Step 4 Step 4a Treatment - Flow-Based (Rational Method)
Calculate treatment flow (cfs): Flow = Runoff Coefficient x Rainfall Intensity x Area Table D-2c
Look up value for i in Table D-2c (Rainfall Intensity) i Roseville i = 0.20 in/hr
Obtain AAT from Step 3 AAT Sacramento i = 0.18 in/hr
Folsom i = 0.20 in/hr
Use C = 0.95 C
Flow = 0.95 * i * AAT cfs
Step 4b Treatment - Volume-Based (ASCE-WEF)
Calculate water quality volume (Acre-Feet): WQV = Area x Maximized Detention Volume (P0 )
Obtain A from Step 1 A 12 hrs Specified Draw Down time
P0
Calculate treatment volume (acre-ft):

Treatment volume = A x (P0 / 12) Acre-Feet
v06232012

0.02 1.50

0.17 0.18 Rainfall Intensity

0.49 0.95

0.08 Does project require hydromodification management? If yes, proceed to using SacHM.

Obtain P0: Maximized Detention Volume from figures E-1 to E-4 in Appendix E of this manual using IA from Step 2.

Commercial
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 616 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 617 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 618 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 619 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 620 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 621 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 622 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 623 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 624 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 625 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 626 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 627 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 628 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 629 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 630 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 1 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
On-Going Conditions

1. The approved entitlement is for a Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Permit for the Goddard School as
described in the City Council staff report dated March 21, 2022 and attached Tentative Parcel Map (Exhibit A) and
Project Plans (Exhibit B) with conditions herein, for project numbers PLND–1021-0008 and PLND-1121-0018.

Project
Description
On-Going Planning

2. Applicant(s) agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless with Counsel selected by the City of Rancho Cordova
(“City”) and its agents, officers, consultants, and employees (“City’s Agents”) from any and all claims, actions, suits, or proceedings against the City or the City’s Agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by the City, or the City’s Agents concerning the project (collectively “Claim”).

The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. Nothing in this paragraph obligates the City to defend any Claim and the City is not required to pay or perform any
settlement arising from any such Claim not defended by the City, unless the settlement is approved in writing by the City.

General On-Going Planning

3. Any future alteration to the buildings, change in use, intensification of the site, or modification to the parking and landscaped area must be reviewed by the City to ensure
compliance with all local, state, and federal regulations.

Minor modifications that are found to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans such as colors, plant materials, or minor lot line adjustments, may be approved administratively. Major modifications shall be approved by the applicable decision making body.

General On-Going Planning

Page 631 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 2 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

4. Applicant/Developer shall not carry a negative account balance with the City for the processing of the project. If a negative account balance occurs, it will be the developer's responsibility to pay the balance due, in order to avoid delays in the processing of future permits or recordation of maps. Please email the Finance Department at
[email protected] for the status of your account with the City.

General On-Going Planning

5. The Permit is valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of City Council approval unless an extension is
granted by the Community Development Director or
substantial construction of the permitted use or project has commenced and is diligently pursued to completion.

Expiration On-Going Planning

6. Noise sources associated with construction, repair,
remodeling, demolition, paving and/or grading of any real property must adhere to the development standards
outlined within the City’s Noise Element, RCMC 6.68 and RCMC 16.18.1407(F).

Noise On-Going Code Enforcement
/Building

7. The removal and replanting of landscape not listed on the approved plan set must be consistent with RCMC

23.716.080 through 23.716.090 and reviewed by the
Planning Department prior to the removal. All landscape care, maintenance, and tree pruning must adhere to RCMC

23.716.100 through 23.716.110.

Landscaping On-Going Planning

8. Applicant shall be responsible for all damage to City streets associated with construcitno of the proejct and shall repair any damage as soon as possible
Sidewalk Repair On-Going Public Works

9. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

Storm Drain
Facilities
On-Going Public Works

10. SASD Design Standards and Specifications require
minimum 6-inch lower laterals for commercial and industrial buildings
Design Standards On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

Page 632 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 3 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

11. Construction of a grease trap or a sand oil separator may be required. The Applicant must verify with the applicable jurisdiction’s building department
Grease Trap /
Sand Oil
Separator
On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

12. If the proposed garbage enclosure will contain a drain to the sewer, it must be covered.

Trash Enclosure On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

13. SASD prohibits gates that prevent access within sewer easements unless the District standards for accessibility through gates are met.

Gate Installations On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

14. Any use of SASD sewer easements, which is not
compatible or interferes with the construction,
reconstruction, operation, maintenance, or repair of SASD sanitary sewer(s), must not be allowed. Each proposed
use must be reviewed and approved in writing by the
District Engineeer prior to the use of the easement by the Grantor. This includes landscaping
Sewer Easements On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

15. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its
easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any
damages to the developed property within said easement
that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

Easements On-Going SMUD

16. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applciant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

Relocation or
Removal
On-Going SMUD

17. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD
easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD
performing work on the Applicant’s property.

Future Facility On-Going SMUD

Page 633 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 4 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

18. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the
Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and
appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

Irrevocable Offer
of Dedication
On-Going SMUD

19. Applicant shall work with SMUD for any additional
permitting required for the project as well as the payment of required fees that may be required as part of SMUD’s
review.

Additional
Permits/fees
On-Going SMUD

20. Design Standards and Specifications require minimum 6- inch lower laterals for commercial and industrial buildings.

SASD Design
Standards
On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District
Prior to Recordation of Map

21. Provide a drainage easement along the south edge of Parcel B per Section 9-7, County of Sacramento
Improvement Standards. The easement will allow the
drainage system from Parcel A to tie into the existing
drainage system along Bear Hollow Drive. The easement
shall have a minimum width of 15-feet.

Drainage
Easement
Prior to Recordation of
Final Map
Public Works

22. A note shall be placed on the final map stating that “Reciprocal access and parking between parcels shown
hereon shall be granted/reserved prior to the sale and/or reconveyance of said parcels
Reciprocal Access
and Parking
Prior to Recordatin of
Final Map
Public Works

23. Dedicate public utility easements, for the installation and maintenance of water, gas, sewer, drainage facilities, traffic control devices and dry utilities as shown on the tentative map.

Public Utility
Easements
Prior to Recordation of
Final Map
Public Works

24. The proposed parcel A is proposed to be served by a private sewer lateral which crosses the proposed parcel B.

Therefore, a private sewer easement must be granted from parcel B to parcel A. A note stating the following must be placed on the Final Map: “PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT
TO BE GRANTED TO PARCEL A”.

Sewer Easements Prior to Recordation of
Final Map
SASD/ Public
Works

Page 634 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 5 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

25. Permanent structures, walls, signs and footings will not be permitted within the existing SASD easement area unless express written permission is obtained from SASD.

SASD Easements Prior to Recordation of
Final Map/Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District
Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans

26. Show the design for a fire access roadway of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width, 13-feet, 6-inches of vertical clearance, and turning radii of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside dimension on the improvement plans. The access
roadway shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any proposed building.

The use of turf-block or grass-crete or similar alternate road surfaces is not approved for installation in fire
apparatus access roadways.

Fire Access
Roadway
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

27. Show the design for an approved fier apparatus turnaround.

The fire apparatus turnaround shall conform to Sacramento Metro Fire Districts, Fire Prevention Standard #3. The fire access turn-around shall be located within 50 feet of the end of the access roadway
Fire Apparatus
Turnaround
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

28. Show on the plan how Fire Lanes will be marked. Fire Lane identification shall be provided along the required fire access roadway. Fire Lane identification shall be in
accordance with the Sacramento Metro Fire Districts Fire Prevention Standard #3 and the California Vehicle Code.

Vehilce parking is prohibited on any street less than 28 feet in width. Vehicle parking is permitted on both sides of streets 36 feet or more in width. Roadway widths shall be measured between the gutter-line or edge of pavement on opposite sides of the road. Identification of fire apparatus access roadways may be required on private roads.

Fire Lanes Priro to Approvla of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

Page 635 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 6 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

29. Provide a note on the plan that reads, “Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed live load of 80,000 pounds, with a maximum
axle load of 31,000 pounds, and meet Public Works
Standards for roadways. A report, prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer, verifying the ability of the orad to bear the required
Fire Apparatus
Access Roads
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department.

30. Show the location of the required fire hydrants for this project on the improvement plans. Approved fire hydrants capable of providing the required fire flow for the protection of any and all structures shall be located along the fire apparatus access roadway. The required fire hydrants
shall be installed and operational prior to any construction or on-site storage of combustible materials. The minimum requried fire flow for the protection of commercial
devleopments is 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) at a
pressure of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) for a two-hour duration.

Fire Hydrants Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

31. Drainage Study: Applicant shall prepare and submit a project specific drainage study that includes but is not limited to: a pre- and post-project drainage analysis of the project impacts, identification of offsite project impacts or required offsite improvements, and identification of
proposed connections to the City’s Storm Drainage System with adequate supporting calculations. The drainage study shall conform to the requirements of the Sacramento
City/County Drainage Manual (Volume 2), County of
Sacramento Improvement Standards (Section 9), and all
other applicable City standards. The drainage study must be developed and stamped by a Professional Engineer and determined by the City to be accurate and adequate.

Drainage Study Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 636 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 7 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

32. Stormwater Quality- Post Construction
The improvement plans shall incorporate all applicable post construction stormwater quality measures; including source control (loading docks, waste management areas),
treatment control, hydromodification management, low
impact development, and full capture trash control
measures into the site improvement plans in conformance with the most recent version of the Stormwater Quality
Design Manual for the Sacramento Region. The applicant
shall prepare and submit a Post-Construction Stormwater Quality Control Plan that includes details and sizing
calculations of all the proposed post construction
stormwater quality measures. In addition, a maintenance covenant is required for all proposed post construction stormwater quality measures, as detailed in Appendix B of the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region.

Stormwater Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 637 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 8 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

33. Stormwater Quality– During Construction:

SWPPP – the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be executed through all phases of grading and project construction. The SWPPP shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to
ensure that potential water quality impacts during
construction phases are minimized. These measures shall be consistent with the City’s Improvement Standards and Land Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance. During
construction, the applicant shall implement BMPs in
accordance with the SWPPP and the City’s Improvement
Standards.

Construction General Permit
The project applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit For Storm
Water Discharges Associated With Construction And Land
Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit).

Permits are issued by the State Water Resources Control Board.

Stormwater
Quality
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

34. The SWPPP for the site shall include a contingency plan for the implementation of a process to remove fine clay
sediments prior to discharge to the City of Rancho
Cordova’s storm drain system and/or Waters of the State (e.g., creeks, rivers) to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cordova. A polymer treatment system or
comparable process shall be incorporated in the erosion and sediment control plan as part of the improvement plans submittal. This system shall be implemented by qualified professionals with training and proven experience in this field.

SWPPP Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 638 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 9 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

35. Drainage System Design:

The applicant shall submit and obtain City approval of plans and specifications for the construction of public
improvements and all grading. The drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the approved Drainage
Study to accommodate runoff from the ultimate
development and shall meet the City of Rancho Cordova’s Improvement Standards, construction standards, and
Floodplain Management Ordinances in effect at the time of improvement plans approval.

Drainage System Prior to Approval of
Imrpovement Plans
Public Works

36. All development within the City must comply with the City of Rancho Cordova’s Floodplain Management Ordinance. All
new structures shall be protected from the 100-year (1
percent) flood event. Certified pad elevations (certified by a registered Civil Engineer or licensed Land Surveyor) shall be set at least one and two tenths foot (1.2') above all sources of 100-year flooding (see Section 9-1 of
improvement standards). The overland release path must
be shown on the improvement plans and the hydraulic
computation must be provided to estimate the flow depths along the overland release paths. The calculations must be in conformance with Section 9-15 of the Improvement
Standards.

Floodplain
Management
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

37. Provide a permanent concrete stamp, or other permanently applied message to the satisfaction of the City not including paint, which reads “No Dumping-Flows to Creek” or other approved message at each storm drain inlet.

Concrete Stamp Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

38. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

Storm Drain
Facilities
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

39. Enter into a frontage agreement and bond for construction of public improvements per the approved Public Works
plans to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Frontage
Agreement
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 639 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 10 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

40. A final landscape plan shall be submitted in conjunction with improvement plan and or building permit submittal and approved by the planning and public works departments
prior to issuance of permits and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC 23.716.020. The final
landscape planting and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered licensed landscape architect and include the following items per RCMC 22.180.060:
• Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
• Irrigation Plan
• Soils Test
• Water Use Calculations
• Irrigation Schedule
• Permeability test for LID facilities’ locations
• Soil media specifications (LID features)
Landscape Plan Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

41. All landscape strips, medians, etc. that contain trees shall be designed to include continuous root barriers. Trees
shall be appropriately sized for their proposed planters. City arborist shall approve all trees.

Tree Installation Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

42. To obtain sewer service, construction of SASD sewer infrastructure will be required. Current SASD Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements
must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

Sewer
Infrastructure
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

43. SASD requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SASD’s sewer
system. If there is more than one buildgin in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line or a separate connection to the SASD public sewer line. These improvements must be
shown on the plans.

SASD
Connections
Priro to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer Distrcit

Page 640 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 11 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

44. Sewer easements will be required to service this parcel. All public sewer easeements will be dedicated to SASD in a
form approved by the District Engineer. All public sewer easeements will be at least 20 feet in width and will require continuous access for installation and maintenance. SASD will only provide maintenance in public right-of-ways and SASD dedicated sewer easements. No awning or
overhang may encroach on the easement area. At
minimum an all-weather access road must be provided to
all manholes.

Sewer Easements Prior to Approva of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

45. Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured
horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

Sewer Clearances Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

46. Lower Laterals must not directly connect to trunk lines (lines with flow greater than 1 MGD)
Lines Prior to Approoval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer district

47. The project has an approved Level 3 sewer study. Any changes to the approved study may require an addendum.

Sewer Study Prior to the
SUBMITTAL of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

48. The applicant shall meet the following: Civil Site Plans and Architectural Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm plans shall be submitted prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Please note: The Sacramento Metro Fire
District does not allow deferred submittals for Fire
Sprinkler or Fire Alarm plans.

Plan Submittals Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

Page 641 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 12 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

49. Applicant shall complete improvement plans to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Improvement plans shall include, but shall not be limited to:
 All onsite civil improvements
 Civil plan shall include an ADA access plan
 Utility laterals
 Replace any damaged sidewalk, curb, and gutter along
property frontage to the satisfaction of The Public
Works Department. Sidewalk panels shall be replaced
to the nearest joint and be ADA compliant.
 Public improvement plans shall clearly delineate all
transitions to existing improvements
 All improvements to be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Provide a landscaping plan. Plan shall include landscaping along the strip fronting Zinfandel Drive.

Improvement
Plans
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

50. The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at
[email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-
6100 to determine if sewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.

Sewer Impact
Fees
Prior to Issuance of a
Building Permit
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

51. Applicant shall submit a a Final Landscape Plan for review with the Building Permit submittal.

Landscape Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Planning

52. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the applicant to conduct a pre-engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.

Structural
Setbacks
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD

53. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate
trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

Utility Clearance Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD

Page 642 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 13 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

54. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD
equipment, transformer location, service conductors).

Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be
found at: https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutionsand-Rebates/Design-and-Construction-Services.

Siting
Requirements
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD

55. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20- feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and
appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

Vehicular Access Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD
Prior to Final Inspection

56. During and upon completion of the installation of the landscaping for the project, the project landscape
architect/designer shall certify that the installed landscape complies with the approved plans. Certification shall be accomplished by completion of site visits at key installation milestones. Key milestones at a minimum shall include:
rough grade, soil amendment verification, Plant material inspection, irrigation coverage test and final installation.

Certification shall include signed site observation reports, photographs and documentation verifying implementation
of soil report recommendations. Failure to submit complete and accurate documentation to the Planning Department
will delay final approval/occupancy of the project.

Landscaping Prior to Final Building
Inspection of the First
Unit
Public Works

57. Install onsite improvements per the approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Department.

On-Site
Improvements
Prior to Final
Inspectino of the First
Unit
Public Works

Page 643 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 14 of 14 ends

City Council Goddard School Project
March 21, 2022 Tentative Parcel Map and Major Design Review Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

58. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping, the designer shall certify that the landscape complies with all city water conserving landscape requirements. Certification shall be accomplished by completion of a certificate of compliance on a form approved by the director of the city public works department. Failure to submit a complete and accurate certificate of compliance will delay final approval of the project and/or discontinue water service per RCMC

22.180.090. Upon receipt of the certificate of compliance and site inspection from City staff, the landscaping
performance bond will be released.

Water
Conservation
Requirements
Prior to Final Building
Inspection
Public Works

59. Record drawings of grading and improvement plans (1 full size and 1 half size hard copy), as well as a compact disc containing said plans in AutoCAD and pdf format, and a
GIS shape file, or equivalent to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be submitted and approved by the Public
Works Department.

Drawing
Recordation
Prior to Final Building
Inspection
Public Works

60. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new or existing buildings in such a position as to be easily read from the street or road fronting the property. The minimum size of the numbers shall not be less than six (6) inches and shall be mounted immediately adjacent to a light
source and shall also contrast with their background.

Addresses Prior to Final Building
Inspection
Sacramento
Metro Fire
ADVISORY:
 FIRE: Any Gates shall be installed in accordance with The County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers Standard. Plan submittal is required prior to installation.

Page 644 of 1447 ends

Subject APN: 072-2360-041-0000 Address: 3370 ZINFANDEL DR 500’ RADIUS RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
Advanced Listing Services Inc
Ownership Listings & Radius Maps
P.O. Box 2593 •Dana Point, CA •92624
Office: (949) 361-3921 •Cell: (949) 310-6869
www.Advancedlisting.com [email protected]
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 645 of 1447 ends

#10824
9/13/2021
500' Ownership Listing
500' Occupant Listing
Prepared for:
072-2360-041-0000

RANCHO CORDOVA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE L P
3370 ZINFANDEL DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
Corey Hecht
12199 15th Street
Yucaipa CA 92399
WSEE Holding LLC
1601 Merkley Ave. #1350
West Sacramento CA 95691
072-0680-075-0000
6AZ TP3 LLC
2001 WILSHIRE BLVD #420
SANTA MONICA CA 90403
072-0690-096-0000

CEGM RANCHO CORDOVA LLC
200 W MADISON ST #3200
CHICAGO IL 60606
072-1960-014-0000

ZSE CYNTHIA VANG LEE
10896 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-015-0000

WENDELL VILLACARLOS
10892 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-016-0000

BOLCHI ROJHANI FAMILY TRUST
10888 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-017-0000

JULIE E BARETSKY
10884 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-018-0000

DENNIS C GODFREY SURVIVORS TRUST
10880 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-019-0000

ROWENA KUMAR
200 MOON CIR #221
FOLSOM CA 95630
072-1960-020-0000

JOHN D DYTE
10872 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-021-0000

MARCEL ROBERTSON
10901 PINELLA WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-022-0000

DENIS MYRMYR
10905 PINELLA WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-051-0000 072-1960-052-0000

RECREATION CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR #230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-013-0000

CAMPANA LIVING TRUST
18024 CHICKAREE DR
OREGON CITY OR 97045
072-1970-014-0000

GELEIN FAMILY TRUST
3312 CORVINA DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-015-0000

MANUEL S MORADA
10857 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-016-0000

KEVIN LUONG
10861 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-017-0000

INGE SHIRLEY LIVING TRUST
10865 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-018-0000

ARTHUR WEINER
9672 175TH PL
REDMOND WA 98052
072-1970-019-0000

NSHAN SIMONYAN
3380 TREFETHEN CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-020-0000

BABAK & VERONICA JAFARNEJAD

REVOCABLE TRUST
3372 TREFETHEN CT
NIMBUS CA 95670
072-1970-023-0000

GILBERT FAMILY TRUST
3381 TREFETHEN CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-024-0000

ARMAN DARBINYAN
3385 TREFETHEN CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-025-0000

KELLEY L WENTWORTH
3389 TREFETHEN CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-026-0000

AMBER SCHAFFNER
10864 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 646 of 1447 ends

072-1970-027-0000

JON LEE
10860 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-028-0000

CHRISTINE POK
10856 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-029-0000

DIANA RAZMIKOVNA MURADYAN
10852 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-030-0000

HUY T LE
10848 BIANCO CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-031-0000

MICHAEL DIPPON
10844 BIANCO CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-032-0000

CRYSTAL M HUCKLEBERRY
10840 BIANCO CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-033-0000

JUSTIN BALL
3301 CORVINA DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-034-0000

BILLECI FAMILY TRUST
3305 CORVINA DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-035-0000

CRISTINA CIBOTAR
3309 CORVINA DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-036-0000

ARMEN TOROSIAN
3313 CORVINA DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-047-0000, 48, 49

RECREATION CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR #230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-036-0000

KHUSHWINDER S & SURINDER K
WARRIN
476 HIGGINS ST
FOLSOM CA 95630
072-2100-037-0000

JAMES L GREATHOUSE
10901 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-038-0000

GEORGE MICHESCU
10897 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-039-0000

STEVEN ENZO GRASSI
10893 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-040-0000

MICAH WELKER
10889 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-041-0000

MEGAN A LOSSER
10885 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-042-0000

JANE M KWON FAMILY TRUST
10881 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-043-0000

DZMITRY HRYNASHKA
10877 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-044-0000

RECREATION CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR #230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-030-0000

DAROLD LAWRENCE COOPER

LIVING TRUST
11025 ORLEANS RIVER CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-031-0000

PEDRO ARIZMENDIZ
10869 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-032-0000

ANTHONY A HAMILTON
10865 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-033-0000

DING ZHOU FAMILY TRUST
44333 PARKMEADOW DR
FREMONT CA 94539
072-2210-034-0000

ROBERT E & SUNJA C YINGLING
10857 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-035-0000

POPAL HOMAYOON BAHRAMAN
10853 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-036-0000
NY TAN
10849 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2360-002-0000

ELLIOTT ASHTON PLACE LLC
340 PALLADIO PKWY #521
FOLSOM CA 95630
072-2360-037-0000

REC CORDOVA
2197 CHASE DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2360-039-0000

CEGM RANCHO CORDOVA LLC
200 W MADISON ST #3200
CHICAGO IL 60606
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 647 of 1447 ends

072-2360-041-0000 072-2360-042-0000

RANCHO CORDOVA RETIREMENT

RESIDENCE L P
2260 MCGILCHRIST ST
SALEM OR 97302
072-2590-059-0000

ESPERANZA SANCHEZ
166 BLACK POWDER CIR
FOLSOM CA 95630
072-2590-100-0000 072-2590-101-0000

RECREATION CORDOVA
2197 CHASE DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3050-207-0000

CAPITAL VILLAGE SOUTH

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
1731 E ROSEVILLE PKWY #140
ROSEVILLE CA 95661
072-3260-019-0000

BELINDA GOCHANGCO
10833 BARDEN
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-020-0000

CUONG Q PHAM
10831 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-021-0000

SHANE SHIMABUKURO
10830 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-022-0000

SARA PURDY
10832 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-023-0000

JOHN DYER
10834 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-024-0000

AMADO FLORES CARRILLO
10836 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-025-0000

MICHAEL P SKIKOS
5390 ASPEN MEADOWS DR
EL DORADO HILLS CA 95762
072-3260-026-0000

DAVID CHO
10840 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-027-0000

CHUONG TRAN
5502 DOUGLAS AVE
AUBURN WA 98092
072-3260-037-0000

MARCIA B MCGRATH FAMILY TRUST
11230 GOLD EXPRESS DR #310
GOLD RIVER CA 95670
072-3260-038-0000
SONG FAMILY 2017 TRUST
12053 TIRESIAS WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742
072-3260-039-0000

CRUZ GRACIANNE DELA
10845 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-040-0000
2008 DHIRAJ & BHAVNA D TALWAR

FAMILY TRUST
2105 BIG SANDY CT
GOLD RIVER CA 95670
072-3260-041-0000

HANS A GREGERSON
10841 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-042-0000

GARIK GASPARYAN
10839 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-043-0000

TEMUUJIN MUNKHBOLD
10837 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-044-0000

AARON A COCHRAN
10835 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-045-0000

FREDERICK NAGUIT
10833 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-046-0000

MITCHELL OLSON
10831 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-047-0000

JOSH D BONDOC AARON
10820 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-048-0000

ULVIYYA YUSIFOVA
473 11TH AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94118
072-3260-049-0000

SHEILA WING REVOCABLE LIVING TR
10824 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-050-0000

COBBS TRUST
10826 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-051-0000

HEIDI SAYLOR
10828 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-052-0000

JOANNE DAVID
10830 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-053-0000

MARK YIEH
18794 MOUNT LASSEN DR
CASTRO VALLEY CA 94552
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 648 of 1447 ends

072-3260-054-0000

CHANDRA S LALCHANDANI REVOCABLE TR
4110 RIDING CLUB LN
SACRAMENTO CA 95864
072-3260-055-0000

HONG DU
10836 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-056-0000

SAMUEL K STREATER
10838 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-057-0000

DEBORAH E MAGILL
10840 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-058-0000

JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ
10842 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-059-0000

ASHWIN THIRUNAHARI
1992 LARKHALL CIR
FOLSOM CA 95630
072-3260-060-0000

SOLEDAD F DEGOMEZ
10846 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-061-0000

LOUIS CULLO
10848 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-062-0000

FRANK JOSEPH BISASE
10850 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-063-0000

AMRA MESIC
10852 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-0680-075-0000

OCCUPANT
3301 ZINFANDEL DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-0690-096-0000

OCCUPANT
3300 ZINFANDEL DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1960-019-0000

OCCUPANT
10876 BIANCO WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-013-0000

OCCUPANT
3316 CORVINA DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-1970-018-0000

OCCUPANT
3388 TREFETHEN CT
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2100-036-0000

OCCUPANT
10905 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-030-0000

OCCUPANT
10873 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2210-033-0000

OCCUPANT
10861 BELLONE WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-2590-059-0000

OCCUPANT
3488 NOUVEAU WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-025-0000

OCCUPANT
10838 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-027-0000

OCCUPANT
10842 BARDEN DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-037-0000

OCCUPANT
10849 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-038-0000

OCCUPANT
10847 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-040-0000

OCCUPANT
10843 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-048-0000

OCCUPANT
10822 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-053-0000

OCCUPANT
10832 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-054-0000

OCCUPANT
10834 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
072-3260-059-0000

OCCUPANT
10844 ARRINGTON DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 649 of 1447 ends

SACRAMENTO SANITATION DISTRICT
10060 GOETHE ROAD
SACRAMENTO CA 95827

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY

SANITATION DISTRICT
10060 GOETHE ROAD
SACRAMENTO CA 95827

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER
AGENCY
10151 FLORIN ROAD
SACRAMENTO CA 95829
PG&E
2730 GATEWAY OAKS DRIVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95833
PG&E
343 SACRAMENTO STREET
AUBURN CA 95603
SMUD
6301 S STREET MS B304
SACRAMENTO CA 95817
SMUD
6301 S STREET MS B304
SACRAMENTO CA 95817
SMUD
6301 S STREET MS B404
SACRAMENTO CA 95817

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN FIRE
10545 ARMSTRONG AVE STE 310
MATHER CA 95655

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT
1965 BIRKMONT DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742

GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
3005 GOLD CANAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 650 of 1447 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1
ITEM 10.4.

DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA'S ADJUSTED STORM DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2022

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution approving the attached Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approval of the 2022 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

BACKGROUND
The City's Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program was established in 2020 through the City Council's adoption of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code (RCMC) Chapter 16.95. The City started collecting fees under this program in March 2021. The fees collected as part of the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program facilitate new development through construction of major drainage infrastructure that provides regional benefits, while mitigating development impacts of the City’s drainage system. The fees are collected at the project approval phase.

On an annual basis, the impact fees are adjusted to account for inflation based on the Engineering News - Record (ENR) index. This year the adjustment is 8.03%. In addition, credits and reimbursements pursuant to RCMC 16.95.110 and 16.95.120 are adjusted annually.

The 2022 Storm Drainage Impact Fee schedule (Attachment 2) includes a table showing the current fees, and the proposed 2022 fees; that will take effect immediately upon approval of this resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The proposed resolution will have no impact on the General Fund. Funds collected pursuant to the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program will be used for City storm drainage purposes.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Storm Drainage Impact Fee Table

Page 651 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.4. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ADJUSTED STORM DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2022
WHEREAS, the City separated from Sacramento County's Zone 11 drainage fee program and created a Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program in 2020; and WHEREAS, City Council Adopted Municipal Code Chapter No. 16.95 Establishing The City's Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program In October 2020; and WHEREAS, the County of Sacramento Board of Supervisors approved the separation of the City of Rancho Cordova from the Zone 11 drainage fee program and the transfer agreement in March 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City started implementing the new Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program in March 2021; and
WHEREAS, annually in January, the City will update the drainage impact fee schedule to account for inflation based on the Engineering News-Record Index, and this year the increase is

8.03%; and
WHEREAS, the adjusted 2022 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule is included in Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA adopts the 2022 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st of March 2022 by following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Donald Terry, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 652 of 1447 ends

Drainage Impact Fee by Land Use - Effective March 2022
Land Use Percent
Impervious
Construction
Cost/Acre
Administration
Cost/Acre
Total
Fee/Acre
Commercial/Office/retail1
70% $ 23,412 $ 937 $ 24,349
Industrial1
70% $ 23,412 $ 937 $ 24,349
High Density Residential - - - -
RMH 75% $ 25,086 $ 1,004 $ 26,090
RD-302
70% $ 23,412 $ 937 $ 24,349
RD-25 70% $ 23,412 $ 937 $ 24,349
RD-20 70% $ 23,412 $ 937 $ 24,349
Medium Density Residential - - - -
RD-15 70% $ 23,412 $ 937 $ 24,349
RD-10 60% $ 20,068 $ 803 $ 20,871
RD-7 50% $ 16,723 $ 669 $ 17,392
RD-6 40% $ 13,379 $ 535 $ 13,914
Low Density Residential - - - -
RD-5 40% $ 13,379 $ 535 $ 13,914
RD-4 38% $ 12,710 $ 508 $ 13,218
RD-3 33% $ 10,871 $ 434 $ 11,305
RD-2 28% $ 9,198 $ 367 $ 9,565
RD-1 25% $ 8,362 $ 335 $ 8,697
AR-1 17% $ 5,686 $ 227 $ 5,913
AR-2 10% $ 3,344 $ 134 $ 3,478
AR-5 10% $ 3,344 $ 134 $ 3,478
AR-10 10% $ 3,344 $ 134 $ 3,478
Mowed Grass with graded and piped to drain 20% $ 6,689 $ 268 $ 6,957 Mowed grass with no piped drainage 10% $ 3,344 $ 134 $ 3,478 Impervious Area of Park2
75% $ 25,086 $ 1,004 $ 26,090
School Campus with detention 25% $ 8,362 $ 335 $ 8,697
School Campus 50% $ 16,723 $ 669 $ 17,392
1 Impervious area for Commercial and Industrial reduced to reflect the use of Low Impact Development (LID) practices, meeting HMP Requirements and increased landscaping standards. Actual fees may vary if LID not utilized. 2 A school or park that detains greater than 50% of peak flow value, at the discretion of the City, may reduce the fee by 50%.

ITEM 10.4. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 653 of 1447 ends

Drainage Impact Fee by Land Use
Land Use Percent
Impervious
Construction
Cost/Acre
Administration
Cost/Acre
Total
Fee/Acre
Commercial/Office/retail1
70% $ 21,673 $ 867 $ 22,540
Industrial1
70% $ 21,673 $ 867 $ 22,540
High Density Residential - - - -
RMH 75% $ 23,222 $ 929 $ 24,151
RD-302
70% $ 21,673 $ 867 $ 22,540
RD-25 70% $ 21,673 $ 867 $ 22,540
RD-20 70% $ 21,673 $ 867 $ 22,540
Medium Density Residential - - - -
RD-15 70% $ 21,673 $ 867 $ 22,540
RD-10 60% $ 18,577 $ 743 $ 19,320
RD-7 50% $ 15,481 $ 619 $ 16,100
RD-6 40% $ 12,385 $ 495 $ 12,880
Low Density Residential - - - -
RD-5 40% $ 12,385 $ 495 $ 12,880
RD-4 38% $ 11,766 $ 470 $ 12,236
RD-3 33% $ 10,063 $ 402 $ 10,465
RD-2 28% $ 8,515 $ 340 $ 8,855
RD-1 25% $ 7,741 $ 310 $ 8,051
AR-1 17% $ 5,264 $ 210 $ 5,474
AR-2 10% $ 3,096 $ 124 $ 3,220
AR-5 10% $ 3,096 $ 124 $ 3,220
AR-10 10% $ 3,096 $ 124 $ 3,220
Mowed Grass with graded and piped to drain 20% $ 6,192 $ 248 $ 6,440 Mowed grass with no piped drainage 10% $ 3,096 $ 124 $ 3,220 Impervious Area of Park2
75% $ 23,222 $ 929 $ 24,151
School Campus with detention 25% $ 7,741 $ 310 $ 8,051
School Campus 50% $ 15,481 $ 619 $ 16,100
1 Impervious area for Commercial and Industrial reduced to reflect the use of Low Impact Development (LID) practices, meeting HMP Requirements and increased landscaping standards. Actual fees may vary if LID not utilized. 2 A school or park that detains greater than 50% of peak flow value, at the discretion of the City, may reduce the fee by 50%.

ITEM 10.4. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 654 of 1447 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1

ITEM 10.5.

DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Michelle Mingay, Senior Finance Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS AND AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE FORMATION OF

THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA ARISTA DEL SOL COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-1

RECOMMENDATION
Continue the public hearing to the May 16, 2022 City Council Meeting.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
This item will be continued to the May 16, 2022 City Council meeting.

ATTACHMENT(S)
None

Page 655 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 15

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 10.6.

DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: DUTCH BROS. COFFEE –CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW– PROJECT NO. PLND-1021-0013- LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST

CORNER OF SUNRISE BOULEVARD AND DOUGLAS ROAD IN ANATOLIA

MARKETPLACE
____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS:

Anatolia Marketplace, LLC
Mark Enes
7919 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95826
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

Anatolia Marketplace, LLC
Mark Enes
7919 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95826
PROJECT: The Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review for a 1,002 SF Dutch Bros. Coffee kiosk building with dual drive-thrus.

The project includes significant site improvements including landscaping, outdoor lighting, and an outdoor patio area with seating. The patio area includes a walk-up window for customers as well as a shade canopy for weather protection.

FILE: PLND-1021-0013
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Sunrise Boulevard and Douglas Road in Anatolia Marketplace
APN:

ZONING:
067-2370-002-0000
General Commercial (GC)
PLANNER: Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would approve a Conditional Use Permit for the requested dual drive- thrus as well as approval of the Minor Design Review for the 1,002 SF Dutch Bros. Coffee kiosk building and coinciding site improvements.

Page 656 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 15

PROJECT HISTORY
The project site is located at the corner of Sunrise Boulevard and Douglas Road and is zoned General Commercial (GC) within the Sunridge Specific Plan Overlay (SDSPO) (See Figure 1).

The site is located within the Anatolia Marketplace Shopping Center, previously known as Anatolia Retail Center (DD9600) which was originally approved on December 5, 2016 (Resolution 136-2016). The approval included a Major Design Review for the overall layout and design concept of the shopping center, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for proposed drive-thrus for pad sites and an Adjustment for a height increase on the center’s proposed freestanding signage. In the original approval, the project site was part of a large building, shown as S-1 (See Figure 2). Since 2016 the property owners have made some slight modifications to the approved layout under the substantial conformance section (Section 23.110.180) of the Zoning Code. The approved modifications resulted in the division of building S-1 into two separate buildings shown as S-1A and S-1B (See Figure 3). This split was followed by a Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM) that was approved on June 15, 2020 (Resolution 70-2020) which placed each building on its own parcel (See Figure 4).

Figure 1: Project Location
Anatolia Marketplace Location

Page 657 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 15
Figure 2: Original Anatolia Retail Center Layout
Figure 3: Substance Conformance Approval

Page 658 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 15
Figure 4: Approved Tentative Map

ANALYSIS
The Applicant is requesting the development of a coffee kiosk with drive-thru services within an approved shopping center. The project will include a 1,002 SF building with 392 SF canopy area and two drive-thru lanes. The project will also include new parking, landscaping, and lighting on-site. The entitlements that will be analyzed individually are as follows.  Conditional Use Permit
 Minor Design Review

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS
The project is located within the Sunridge Specific Plan (SDSP) and is zoned General Commercial (GC). As shown in Figure 2, the original approval in 2016 did include a drive-thru for the overall S-1 building. However, when the buildings were split apart into S-1A and S-1B via substantial conformance, the approved drive-thru was moved over to the S-1B building and therefore the drive-thru for this property would be a new drive-thru that would require a separate use permit. Per the Rancho Cordova Municipal code, a coffee drive-thru kiosk is categorized as a “drive-in and drive-thru sales and service” use and per Table 23.316-1, would require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) at this location. In addition, the code provides additional development and design standards in Section 23.910.030 that are specific for this type of use, and which were utilized as part of this project’s review.

Page 659 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 15
Site Plan Layout:

The overall project site is approximately 0.81 acres in size and consists of a 1,002 SF coffee kiosk building and two drive-thru lanes. The typical customer for a Dutch Bros. Coffee kiosk utilizes the drive-thru however, the Applicant has provided a 392 SF canopy which includes tables and seating to accommodate the pedestrian walk-up window for customers utilizing alternative modes of transportation. In addition to the short-term bicycle parking spaces on-site, the proposed project provides 14 on-site vehicle spaces and will also be included within a Parking and Access Agreement for the overall Anatolia Marketplace Shopping Center. The project includes two drive-thru entrances as well as a drive-thru exit and passing lane; however, the applicant has provided crosswalks to ensure that a direct pedestrian path is maintained from the public sidewalk to other areas of the shopping center. (See Figure 5) Drive-Thru Design and Strategy
As a drive-thru service use, a significant portion of the Dutch Bros. Coffee business is conducted through the drive-thru window and vehicle stacking and traffic control were a high priority as part of this review. In anticipation of a high volume of customers for this use, the Applicant has taken additional precautions to ensure that the business does not affect adjacent properties within the shopping center. The dual drive-thru lanes provide a total of 360 feet of vehicle stacking distance which is twice the minimum amount required by the municipal code (180 ft). This stacking distance can accommodate up to 18 vehicles during peak business hours. The site plan also includes a bypass lane which allows customers to exit the drive-thru should they receive their drink prior to the person in front of them, further reducing the number of vehicles in the stacking lane. The drive-thru design also includes the required 30-inch screening wall to screen the headlights of vehicles that are waiting in the queue from passersby along Douglas Road and the adjacent shopping center entrance. This screen will have stone veneer consistent with the overall shopping center and proposed building (See Figure 5) In addition to the project’s increased stacking capability, Dutch Bros. Coffee is also proposing, what they call, a runner system, that is designed to increase speed and efficiency in serving drive-thru customers. This business does not have the traditional menu order board and instead employee “runners” travel from vehicle to vehicle to greet customers and take orders throughout the drive-thru utilizing a handheld device to transmit orders to drink station employees within the building. Runners are also able to process payment with this device which reduces time at the drive-up window where the customer can pick up their order and exit the site. If an order is completed prior to the customer reaching the window, the order will be brought to the customer in the drive-thru lane and the customer can utilize the bypass lane to exit the site, reducing the number of vehicles unnecessarily waiting in the drive-thru lane.

As a proactive measure, Dutch Bros. Coffee also requires all employees to attend a monthly meeting to discuss traffic plans in detail. Employees will gather before each shift to ensure that a traffic strategy is set and followed. There are approximately 3-4 runners per shift and 1 additional staff member added whose sole responsibility is traffic control which includes instructing vehicles to pull forward, directing cars into waiting areas or bypass lanes, and ensuring cars are not blocking the road or other areas that are not allowed to be blocked.

Page 660 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 15
Figure 5: Project Site Plan
Traffic
The Applicant has worked directly with the Public Works Department regarding any potential traffic concerns that could affect the City’s public rights of way. The Applicant has provided a Trip Generation Analysis for on-site circulation as well as a Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis and Safety Assessment for westbound left turns at the Anatolia Marketplace Access Intersection on Douglas Road.

The Trip Generation Analysis compared the proposed Dutch Bros. Coffee site design and location to other locations in both Stockton and other areas of Northern California with similar traffic designs and strategies. The comparison showed that the largest number of concurrent vehicles at the busiest of the three locations was in the range of 13 to 16 vehicles within the queue at peak hours. The proposed design has the capacity for up to 18 vehicles to be stacked within drive-thru lanes and therefore the design was determined to be adequate. Should the queueing exceed 18 vehicles at any point, Dutch Bros. Coffee has a temporary traffic control strategy that guides additional vehicles through the parking lot aisle and away from the Douglas Road
Shopping Center
Entrance

Page 661 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 15
shopping center entrance and any public right of way. This control measure is proposed to be precautionary and queueing beyond 18 vehicles is not anticipated.

The Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis provided an additional assessment of how the project may trigger the need for traffic signal control at the intersection of Douglas Road and the Anatolia Shopping Center entrance. The Applicant worked with the Public Works Department regarding this analysis, and it was agreed that left turns into the Anatolia Marketplace Driveway will continue to be feasible with the proposed project and that no additional traffic signal would be necessary at this intersection.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
As required per Zoning Code section 23.134.070, Conditional Use Permits are a discretionary quasi-judicial decision by City Council. Council may approve or approve with conditions an application for a Conditional Use Permit after all the following findings and evidence are met:

A. Finding: The site size, dimensions, location, topography, and access are adequate for the needs of the proposed use, considering the proposed building mass, parking, traffic, noise, vibration, exhaust/emissions, light, glare, erosion, odor, dust, visibility, safety, and aesthetic considerations.

Evidence: The proposed project is for a 1,0002 SF coffee kiosk drive-thru service use.

The proposed location is adequate for the needs of the proposed use and provides sufficient parking, outdoor seating area, and more than accommodates the required vehicle stacking distance. The use does not utilize traditional menu ordering boards and therefore reduces the amount of noise for a drive-thru use. The project is also located away from neighboring residential uses and will not create any lighting concerns for adjacent properties.

B. Finding: The negative impacts of the proposed use on adjacent properties and on the public can be mitigated through application of other code standards or other reasonable conditions of approval.

Evidence: The Applicant thoroughly analyzed potential on-site and off-site traffic concerns regarding the proposed use and has provided more than adequate vehicle stacking distance to minimize queuing onto adjacent properties. The Applicant is meeting the required additional development standards required for drive-thru service uses and has provided their traffic control strategy for the site which has been shown to be effective at other Dutch Bros. Coffee locations. The Applicant has also provided additional analysis to show that there will be no off-site traffic effects to public rights of way and that any additional trips to the property by customers will not significantly impact the intersection of Douglas Road and the Anatolia Shopping Center access point.

C. Finding: All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal.

Evidence: The overall shopping center was intended for retail and restaurant uses and the public facilities intended for the shopping center have been constructed to provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.

D. Finding: The project meets the requirements of the zoning code including development standards, design guidelines, and special use provisions.

Page 662 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 15
Evidence: The project location is zoned General Commercial (GC) which allows for a drive-thru service use with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed drive-thru is meeting all required development standards as well as special use development standards specifically for drive-thru uses. These special standards include minimum lane widths for drive-thru aisles, distance requirements for ingress and egress to drive-thrus, as well as additional landscape requirements and pedestrian access. The proposed use has met all applicable requirements.

E. Finding: If structures and site plans are considered nonconforming, the elements of a project that are nonconforming have been brought into compliance with the Zoning Code, where feasible.

Evidence: The proposed project would be a new development and has been reviewed with current codes and regulations. There are no nonconforming structures or aspects of the site plan that are included as part of this project.

MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
A minor design review is required for new construction of nonresidential buildings equal to or greater than 1,000 SF and less than 5,000 SF as well as significant changes to all nonresidential site plans that impact required site plan elements. The proposed project is for a 1,002 SF building and involves a completely new development which includes landscaping, drive-thrus, and parking and lighting areas. Therefore, a minor design review approval is required for this project.

Elevations
The proposed coffee kiosk building is 24 feet in height at its tallest point with multiple metal awnings and is consistent with the company’s standard design for Dutch Bros. Coffee with their signature blue and gray color scheme. However, the building does incorporate materials such as fiber cement wood-like siding, a medium sand body color, and stone veneer that is consistent with the original paint and materials that were approved as part of the overall shopping center in 2016. The stone veneer will also be incorporated into the pillars of the 392 SF canopy for walk up orders and outdoor seating as well as the 30-inch screening wall along the drive-thru. This allows the building to blend in with any future buildings constructed on-site while also maintaining a signature Dutch Bros. Coffee look. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment will be screened from public view as required by the Rancho Cordova Zoning Code (See Figures 6- 9).

Page 663 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 15
Figure 6: South Elevation Facing Parking Lot
Figure 7: East Elevation Facing Shopping Center Entrance

Page 664 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 10 of 15
Figure 8: North Elevation Facing Douglas Road
Figure 9: West Elevation Facing Pad S-1b
Figure 10: Elevation Renderings

Page 665 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 11 of 15
Lighting:

The project has proposed adequate lighting throughout the property that meets the requirements for Chapter 23.725: Outdoor Lighting as well as the requirements and standards of Chapter 23.719.090: Design standards for surface parking lots, of the Rancho Cordova Zoning Code. All parking lot lighting and shopping center lighting was approved as part of the original shopping center approval.

Landscaping:

The project proposes a variation of landscaping throughout the site in addition to the 35-foot landscape and pedestrian easement along Douglas Road that was already approved as part of the shopping center. The preliminary landscape plan shows a bioswale along the entrance to the shopping center to the east, tree planting for parking lot shading requirements as well as trees planted along the west side of the site separating the drive-thru from the adjacent property. Additional shrubs and groundcover will also be included along the drive-thru screening wall proposed along the shopping center entrance and Douglas Road (See Figures 11 & 12)

Page 666 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 12 of 15
Figure 11: Preliminary Landscape Plan
Figure 12: Landscape Area to be Installed by Shopping Center 35-Foot Landscape & Pedestrian Easement Previously approved preliminary landscape and pedestrian easement landscaping

Page 667 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 13 of 15

MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS & EVIDENCE
As required per Zoning Code section 23.140.070, the approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions an application for a minor design review after all of the following findings are met:

A. Finding: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, complies with applicable zoning regulations, Specific Plan provisions, and special planning area provisions, and is consistent with the applicable Rancho Cordova design guidelines
Evidence: The proposed site location is within the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) general plan land use designation and is consistent with the objectives of that designation. The proposed Dutch Bros. Coffee building is also consistent with all applicable standards and requirements of the Sunridge Specific Plan and Rancho Cordova Municipal Code. The project adhered to the Rancho Cordova Design Guidelines as well as additional use specific requirements for drive-thru service uses.

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The project location is currently an undeveloped shopping center that is in early stages of construction. The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for a drive-thru use. The proposed drive-thru lanes are screened as required by the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and the applicant included an outdoor patio seating area to encourage a pedestrian friendly gathering space for customers and nearby residents. The development of the site will enhance the character of the neighborhood.

Evidence: The architecture has been reviewed to ensure that the project is consistent with the overall design concept of the previously approved shopping center. The design proposes Dutch Bros. Coffee’s signature blue and gray color scheme and incorporates the main base color, stone veneer, and wood siding used on the other buildings throughout the shopping center. Once constructed, the proposed building will be consistent with adjacent properties and other buildings within the shopping center.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflict with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Page 668 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 14 of 15
ensure that the drive-thru does not interfere with on-site circulation. The Applicant has also included pedestrian walkways across the drive-thru lanes to ensure pedestrian connections are still maintained to public rights of way. No conflicts with circulation will be created as part of the proposed project.

GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE CONSISTENCY
General Plan:

The project site is located within a Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) general plan designation.

The Commercial Mixed-Use category encourages the integration of retail and service commercial uses with office and/or residential uses. Although Dutch Bros. Coffee primarily provides drive-thru services for its customers, the Applicant also includes a walk-up window and outdoor patio area to provide a pedestrian friendly experience for customers and residents of the adjacent residential area.

Zoning Ordinance:

The project site is zoned General Commercial (GC) within the Sunridge Specific Plan (SDSP).

The SDSP encourages a mix of uses organized around the residential neighborhood unit. The SDSP is primarily residential however, it also provides for some complementary commercial areas. The three core commercial areas of the specific plan are the Sunridge Shopping Center across the street from the proposed project site, Anatolia Marketplace which is currently under construction and where the proposed project is to be located, and the Montelena Shopping Center on the corner of Douglas Road and Rancho Cordova Parkway. The proposed drive-thru service use is allowed as part of the GC zone within the SDSP and meets all required standards and requirements that are applicable per the specific plan and the Rancho Cordova Zoning Code.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Minor Design Review associated with the Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros. Coffee would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183. This section exempts from CEQA projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are projectspecific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros. Coffee Minor Design Review involves construction and operation of a new Dutch Bros. Coffee located within the Sunridge Specific Plan area. The commercial site was previously approved as part of the overall Anatolia Marketplace Retail Center project and was identified in the Sunridge Specific Plan Revised EIR (2011, SCH 1997022055). As this Minor Design Review is consistent with the Sunridge Specific Plan and the environmental documentation prepared for the Sunridge Specific Plan, it is exempt from CEQA review.

An assessment of traffic operations was prepared for the proposed Dutch Bros. Coffee to determine whether the Dutch Bros. Coffee is consistent with the assumptions for site development made when the Anatolia Marketplace was approved. The assessment concludes that the project plan has the capacity to accommodate anticipated queuing on site, and if a longer queue was to occur, the aisle through the parking lot has the adequate length to ensure that any vehicle queuing would not extend into a public right of way or interfere with overall shopping center access to Douglas Boulevard.

Page 669 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 15 of 15
The project does not have any project-specific significant effects peculiar to the Minor Design Review and not identified in the previous environmental documentation, therefore, the project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.

RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:
 Find that the project is Exempt from CEQA per CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning; and  Approve the Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Minor Design Review for the Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros. Coffee – Project No. PLND-1021-0013.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution– Project Plans

3. Exhibit B to the Resolution – Conditions of Approval

4. 500’ Radius Map and Labels

Page 670 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 4

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XXX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE ANATOLIA MARKETPLACE DUTCH BROS. COFFEE – PROJECT NO. PLND-1021-0013
WHEREAS, Anatolia Marketplace, LLC (hereinafter referred to as Applicant) filed an application with the City of Rancho Cordova for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Minor Design Review approval for the Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros. Coffee project; and WHEREAS, the project site is located within the Anatolia Marketplace shopping center located at the southeast corner of Douglas Road and Sunrise Boulevard within a General Commercial (GC) zoning designation; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is for a 1,002 SF coffee kiosk with dual drive-through lanes which is considered a drive-through service use and requires a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review per Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Table 23.316-1; and WHEREAS, the City Council is the appropriate authority to hear and take action on this project; and
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning and would not result in any significant effects to the environment, and therefore was determined to be Exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Section 15183 (Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning): and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova has conducted a properly noticed public hearing pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented during the hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The CEQA exemption found in California Code of Regulation Title 14, Section 15183 (Consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning) is an adequate exemption according to the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act.

A. Finding: The project has been analyzed and is exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15183 “Consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning.”
Evidence: The Minor Design Review associated with the Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros. Coffee would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183. This section exempts from CEQA projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The Anatolia Marketplace Dutch Bros. Coffee Minor Design Review involves construction and operation of a new Dutch Bros. Coffee located

Page 671 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 4
within the Sunridge Specific Plan area. The commercial site was previously approved as part of the overall Anatolia Marketplace Retail Center project and was identified in the Sunridge Specific Plan Revised EIR (2011, SCH 1997022055). As this Minor Design Review is consistent with the Sunridge Specific Plan and the environmental documentation prepared for the Sunridge Specific Plan, it is exempt from CEQA review.

The project does not have any project-specific significant effects peculiar to the Minor Design Review and not identified in the previous environmental documentation, therefore, the project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required.

2. Approve the Conditional Use Permit Amendment subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit B, and subject to the findings as defined by Zoning Code Section

23.134.070 and evidence as follows:

A. Finding: The site size, dimensions, location, topography, and access are adequate for the needs of the proposed use, considering the proposed building mass, parking, traffic, noise, vibration, exhaust/ emissions, light, glare, erosion, odor, dust, visibility, safety, and aesthetic considerations.

Evidence: The proposed project is for a 1,0002 SF coffee kiosk drive-thru service use.

The proposed location is adequate for the needs of the proposed use and provides sufficient parking, outdoor seating area, and more than accommodates the required vehicle stacking distance. The use does not utilize traditional menu ordering boards and therefore reduces the amount of noise for a drive-through use. The project is also located away from neighboring residential uses and will not create any lighting concerns for adjacent properties.

B. Finding: The negative impacts of the proposed use on adjacent properties and on the public can be mitigated through application of other code standards or other reasonable conditions of approval.

Evidence: The Applicant thoroughly analyzed potential on-site and off-site traffic concerns regarding the proposed use and has provided more than adequate vehicle stacking distance to minimize queuing onto adjacent properties. The Applicant is meeting the required additional development standards required for drive thru services uses and has provided their traffic control strategy for the site which has been shown to be effective at other Dutch Bros locations. The Applicant has also provided additional analysis to show that there will be no off-site traffic effects to public rights of way and that any additional trips to the property by customers will not significantly impact the intersection of Douglas Road and the Anatolia Shopping Center access point.

Page 672 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 4
C. Finding: All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal.

D. Finding: The project meets the requirements of the zoning code including design standards, design guidelines, and special use provisions.

Evidence: The project location is zoned General Commercial (GC) which allows for a drive-through service use with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed drive-through is meeting all required development standards as well as special use development standards specifically for drive-through uses. These special standards include minimum lane widths for drive-through aisles, distance requirements for ingress and egress to drive-throughs, as well as additional landscape requirements and pedestrian access. The proposed use has met all applicable requirements.

E. Finding: If structures and site plans are considered nonconforming, the elements of a project that are nonconforming have been brought into compliance with the zoning code, where feasible.

3. To approve the Design Review, subject to the Minor Design Review Package (Exhibit A) and the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B); supported by the following Findings and Evidence, as required by Zoning Code Section 23.140.070:

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The project location is currently an undeveloped shopping center that is in early stages of construction. The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for a drive-through use. The proposed drive-through lanes are screened as required by the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and the applicant included an outdoor patio seating area to encourage a pedestrian friendly gathering space for customers and

Page 673 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 4 of 4
nearby residents. The development of the site will enhance the character of the neighborhood.

C. Finding: The architecture, including the character, scale, and quality of design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements, establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of existing or anticipated buildings on adjoining and nearby properties
Evidence: The architecture has been reviewed to ensure that the project is consistent with the overall design concept of the previously approved shopping center. The design proposes Dutch Bros. Coffee’s signature blue and gray color scheme and incorporates the main base color, stone veneer, and wood siding used on the other buildings throughout the shopping center. Once constructed, the proposed building will be consistent with adjacent properties and other buildings within the shopping center.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Evidence: The Applicant included a trip generation analysis as well as a traffic signal warrants analysis and safety assessment as part of their project submittal. These items were thoroughly reviewed by the Public Works Department, and it was determined the proposed use would not have a significant impact on off-site traffic circulation. The applicant has also proposed a vehicle stacking distance twice the minimum required distance and a specific traffic control strategy for their drive-through queueing to ensure that the drive-through does not interfere with on-site circulation. The Applicant has also included pedestrian walkways across the drive-through lanes to ensure pedestrian connections are still maintained to public rights of way. No conflicts with circulation will be created as part of the proposed project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st day of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 674 of 1447 ends

PROJECT NARRATIVE
Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review
Dutch Bros Coffee
SEQ – Sunrise Boulevard and Douglas Road
Rancho Cordova, California 95742
Prepared by:

Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.

December 8, 2021
Our Job No. 22015
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 675 of 1447 ends

1 22015.003-Narrative.docx
Project Overview
The project proposes to develop a 35,414-square-foot parcel for construction of a new 1,002-square-foot Dutch Bros Coffee with dual drive-through lanes and associated site improvements, including a trash enclosure, parking, landscaping, and various site amenities.

This project is located on parcel S-1A of the Anatolia Marketplace development. The property is currently zoned as General Commercial (GC). The drive-through use requires a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review application.

Site Amenities
A separate covered service window will be offered for walk-up customers on the eastern side of the building opposite the drive-through service window. It faces the main entrance and sidewalk to the overall development to attract the attention of nearby pedestrians. The canopy provides shade and weather protection when customers are ordering. A bench will be provided under the canopy for seating options.

In addition, a shade tree and well-designed landscaping will be provided to create beautiful scenery.

An ADA path will connect to the main sidewalk and will include clearly marked crosswalks to cross the entrance and exit of the drive-through lanes. The ADA path also extends to the parking lot and adjacent parcels to provide the maximum pedestrian access from all surrounding areas.

Parking Evaluation
City Code requires one (1) parking spaces per two (2) employees. During peak periods, up to eight (8) employees may be on shift, requiring five (4) parking spaces. This project will include surface parking for 14 vehicles. The site will also include two (2) bicycle parking spaces.

Queuing and Stacking
Approximately 360 feet of stacking space is available behind the drive-through window to provide queuing for up to 18 vehicles. Dutch Bros Coffee will implement a runner system at the proposed facility that is designed to increase speed and efficiency in serving drive-through customers. Dutch Bros Coffee employees travel from vehicle to vehicle to greet customers and take orders. These "runners" utilize a handheld device to transmit customer's orders to the multiple drink stations inside the building. Additionally, runners will charge individuals while in line, so by the time they arrive at the service window, they may pick up their order and be on their way. This system decreases wait times, while allowing the runners to have a more personal face-to-face interaction with customers.

The drive-through will not include any speaker boxes. All customer orders are taken in person either at the window or with a runner that carries a handheld device to transmit orders to the kitchen. This ordering process minimizes noise impacts and decreases the amount of vehicle idling at menu boards that are common at traditional drive-through facilities.

Traffic Control Measures
The Dutch Bros Coffee site is proposing an extensive directional sign package that will direct customers throughout the site. In addition, the layout of the site was designed to create the best possible flow and the maximum queuing possible to reduce spillover onto neighboring properties or the public roads.

All staff are required to attend a monthly shop meeting to discuss traffic plans in detail. In addition, the staff will gather before each shift to ensure that the traffic strategy is set.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 676 of 1447 ends

2 22015.003-Narrative.docx
Approximately three (3) or four (4) staff will be dedicated to the parking area throughout the day to take orders and receive payments. In addition, one (1) person's sole responsibility will be traffic control. Tactics will include instructing all vehicles to pull forward as close as possible to utilize the maximum queuing available, directing cars into the waiting area or the escape lane, if needed, and ensuring no cars are blocking the road or areas they are not allowed to block.

These measures, in addition to implementing the runner system described above, will reduce customers' time at the window to 30 to 45 seconds. If customers are taking longer than that timeframe, the drink runners will bring drinks to the customers in line behind the window to allow those customers to exit via the bypass lane. This means customers are not required to reach the drive-through window to receive their order and exit the site. These measures significantly minimize the potential for queuing spillover outside the dedicated drive-through lanes.

Site Design and Orientation
The proposed Dutch Bros Coffee will include a separate customer window that is oriented to the eastern side of the site to serve pedestrian walk-up traffic only. The vehicle drive-through lane wraps around the east, north, and west property lines with the window and exit located on the west side of the property. A 30-inch wall will be provided along the northern and eastern property line to screen vehicle headlines from the right-of-way.

Architecture
The proposed building is visually interesting and will be constructed with a variety of high-quality building materials and painted with simple, bold colors. Vertical and horizontal façade breaks, building massing, and modulation have all been incorporated into the design of the building. Canopy awnings are provided over all entrances and service doors, including a large 300-square-foot canopy over the customer walk-up service window providing weather protection. The building features modulation with a tower element, building wall articulation, and building materials that are aesthetic and compatible with other newer developments in the community. Colorful and visually interesting wall signs depicting the Dutch Bros Coffee logos will be installed on all sides of the building.

Signs and Lighting
Signs proposed for use at the project site will conform to the City of Rancho Cordova Zoning Code. Signs proposed to be installed at the project site include wall signs, menu signs, drive-through, parking lot, and directional signs. Signs will be constructed with high-quality materials and properly installed under separate permits.

Site lighting will be provided at the project site for the safety and security of all customers, pedestrians, and employees. Outdoor lighting and illumination at the site will include parking lot security lighting and pedestrian scale lighting within the patio space and along the pedestrian pathway. Exterior building lighting will be installed on the building façade. The drive-through area will be provided with security lighting. All lights will include shields to direct light toward the project site and keep glare away from the adjacent land uses and rights-of-way.

Conclusion
The proposed Dutch Bros Coffee will enhance the commercial character of the General Commercial (GC) district. Dutch Bros Coffee is a successful business that will promote improvement of the existing commercial area. Dutch Bros Coffee locations are known to be clean and well maintained, providing quick service from friendly staff. The proposed coffee shop will provide excellent products and service, along with enhanced landscaping areas, lighting, and pedestrian open space at the project site that will benefit all customers and users in the immediate vicinity and the surrounding areas. The above narrative demonstrates how the proposal will increase the overall quality of the project site and positively impact the citizens and businesses of the surrounding community and the City of Rancho Cordova.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 677 of 1447 ends

DOUGLAS ROAD VAN

PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD

DUTCH BROS COFFEE
1,002 SQ. FT. “ “ ” “ ” ” Dial 811 Callbefore you dig. Know what'sbelow. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1"=20' ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 678 of 1447 ends

VAN

PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD

DUTCH BROS COFFEE
1,002 SQ. FT. “ “ ” “ ” ” Dial 811 Callbefore you dig. Know what'sbelow. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1"=10' ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 679 of 1447 ends

VAN

PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD

DUTCH BROS COFFEE
1,002 SQ. FT. “ “ ” “ ” ” Dial 811 Callbefore you dig. Know what'sbelow. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1"=10' ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 680 of 1447 ends

VAN

PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD

DUTCH BROS COFFEE
1,002 SQ. FT. “ “ ” “ ” ” Dial 811 Callbefore you dig. Know what'sbelow. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1"=10' ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 681 of 1447 ends

2'-10"
(ALIGN W/ FINISH

ON BLDG)
1'-8"
(2'-6" MIN.) ADJACENT FINISHED LANDSCAPE GRADE SITE CMU SCREENING WALL; COORD. FINISH MATERIALS W/ BLDG “ “ ” “ ” ” Dial 811 Callbefore you dig. Know what'sbelow. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 682 of 1447 ends

DOUGLAS ROAD

SUNRISE BOULEVARD

HERODIAN DRIVE
VAN
VAN
S-2
9,000 SF
S-1B
4,050 SF
S-4
5,000 SF
VAN
S-3
5,950 SF
VAN
P-1
3,200 SF
S-1A
6,000 SF
VAN
FUTURE PHASE 2
FUTURE PHASE 2
32 RSC ENGINEERING

ANATOLIA RETAIL CENTER
PHASE 1
4001-4045 SUNRISE BOULEVARD

SOUTHEAST CORNER

DOUGLAS RD AND SUNRISE BLVD

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA

ANATOLIA, LLC

FIRE RISER STUB UP

FIRE RISER DETAIL
C11.0

FIRE SHEET
LEGEND

FIRE LANE CURB DETAIL

CONSTRUCTION
TYPE BUILDING* AREA (SF) # OF FLOORS
25 ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 683 of 1447 ends

DRIVE-THRU WINDOW

LOOKING NORTH-EAST LOOKING SOUTH-EAST
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 684 of 1447 ends

WALK-UP WINODW

LOOKING SOUTH-WEST LOOKING NORTH-WEST
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 685 of 1447 ends

FLOOR PLAN
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
PRE-FAB. METAL

AWNING, ABOVE
COOLER
UNISEX

ACCESSIBLE

RESTROOM

PRODUCTION
ELEC.

AREA
10'-0" 28'-2"
50'-0"
12'-0" 9'-0" 5'-0"
1'-0" 32'-0" 10'-0"
9'-0" 15'-6"
26'-0"
MECH.

ROOM
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
PRE-FAB. METAL

AWNING, ABOVE
PRE-FAB. METAL
AWNING, ABOVE.

PRE-FAB. METAL

AWNING, ABOVE
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
AWNING

DOWNSPOUT

LOCATION
28'-0" (CANOPY)
14'-0" (CANOPY)
1'-6"
SQUARE FOOTAGE :

GROSS = 1,002 SQ. FT.

DRIVE-THRU SERVICE
WINDOW

WALK-UP SERVICE
WINDOW
1'-0"PROPOSED

ELECTRICAL GEAR

LOCATION
7'-0"
10'-10"
PRE-FAB.

METAL

AWNING,
ABOVE

EXTERIOR TABLE

AND BENCHES

EXTERIOR TABLE

AND BENCHES
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 686 of 1447 ends

ROOF PLAN
1 4"
PER 1'-0"
1 4"
PER 1'-0"
1 4"
PER 1'-0"
1 4"
PER 1'-0"
CRICKET 1
4"
PER 1'-0"
EQ15A
COORD. W/ MECHANICAL;
INSTALLED ON SLEEPERS.

PRE-FAB

METAL AWNING,

BY OTHERS, BELOW

PRE-FAB METAL AWNING,

BY OTHERS, BELOW
PRE-FAB. METAL AWNING,

BY OTHERS, BELOW

SLOPED RIGID

INSULATION VALLEY
1 4"
PER 1'-0"
AWNING DRAIN TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF CURB AT DRIVE AISLE

W/ TRENCH DRAIN
AWNING DRAIN TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF CURB

OR DAYLIGHT TO LANDSCAPE

W/ TRENCH DRAIN
AWNING DRAIN TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF CURB

OR DAYLIGHT TO LANDSCAPE

W/ TRENCH DRAIN
AWNING DRAIN TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF

CURB AT DRIVE AISLE
1 4"
PER 1'-0"

ROOF MOUNTED
HVAC EQUIP.;
COORD. W/
MECH.

PARAPET 1 ROOF DRAIN W/ OVERFLOW;
CONNECT PARAPET 2 ROOF DRAIN TO

STORM SEWER OR DAYLIGHT THROUGH

FACE OF CURB AT DRIVE AISLE
W/ TRENCH DRAIN.

DAYLIGHT OVERFLOW 18" ABOVE GRADE.
1 4"
PER 1'-0"

CRICKET

CRICKET
EQ31

BUILDING
PARAPET 1

BUILDING
PARAPET 2
CANOPY ROOF DRAIN TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF CURB

OR DAYLIGHT TO LANDSCAPE

W/ TRENCH DRAIN
1 4"
PER 1'-0"

CANOPY ROOF OVERFLOW,
DAYLIGHT 1" PROUD

OF SOFFIT MATERIAL
CANOPY ROOF DRAIN TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF CURB

OR DAYLIGHT TO LANDSCAPE

W/ TRENCH DRAIN

CANOPY ROOF OVERFLOW,
DAYLIGHT 1" PROUD

OF SOFFIT MATERIAL
RIDGE

CRICKET CRICKET
P-14 P-14
P-14 P-14
1/4"
PER 1'-0"
1/4"
PER 1'-0"
PARAPET 2 ROOF DRAIN
W/ OVERFLOW;

DRAIN AND DAYLIGHT ONTO
PARAPET 1 ROOF.

DAYLIGHT OVERFLOW
18" ABOVE GRADE.

P-14
ROOFING MATERIAL :

DURO-LAST INC.

DURO-LAST - 50 MIL - WHITE
EQ8A
COORD. W/ MECH;
(2ND UNIT IN CLIMATE
ZONES 1-4)
PRE-FAB. METAL AWNING,

BY OTHERS, BELOW
06 NOTE :

ROOF PARAPET IS GREATER THAN
42" ABOVE ROOF LEVEL; NO FALL

PROTECTION REQUIRED AND

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
SCREENED BY PARAPET. PARAPET 2 ROOF DRAIN
W/ OVERFLOW;

DRAIN AND DAYLIGHT ONTO
PARAPET 1 ROOF.

DAYLIGHT OVERFLOW
18" ABOVE GRADE.

BUILDING
PARAPET 2
1 4"
PER 1'-0"

AWNING DRAIN
TO DOWNSPOUTS;

CONNECT TO STORM SEWER

OR DAYLIGHT TO FACE OF

CURB AT DRIVE AISLE

W/ TRENCH DRAIN
PRE-FAB.

METAL AWNING,

BY OTHERS,
BELOW
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 687 of 1447 ends

SOUTH ELEVATION
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 688 of 1447 ends

EAST ELEVATION - WALK-UP WINDOW
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 689 of 1447 ends

NORTH ELEVATION
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 690 of 1447 ends

WEST ELEVATION - DRIVE-THRU WINDOW
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 691 of 1447 ends

TRASH ENCLOSURE
6'-0"
20'-0"
4'-0" 8"
5'-6"
6'-0" 4'-0" CL CL CL
CL
2 A9
5 A9
3 A9
4 A9
7'-0"
8 1/2"
1"
6'-0" T.O. WALL
(2) 4'-4" x 5'-8"

STEEL GATES,
W/ 6" DIA. HSS

GATE POST,
FILLED W/ CONC.;
EMBED 36" INTO
CONC. FTG.
3'-1" x 5'-2" PEDESTRIAN

ACCESS GATE,
W/ 4" HSS POSTS,
FILLED W/ CONC.,
EMBED 36" INTO
CONC. FTG.

DUMPSTER BY

GARBAGE SERVICE

PROVIDER
1/2" DIA. x 24"L CANE BOLT

LATCH RODS
6"H x 6"W CONC. CURB

AT SIDES OF
TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.

CONC. SLAB

W/ REINFORCEMENT,

PER STRUCTURAL

CORRUGATED METAL

PAINTED PER PLAN
3/4" PIPE
SET INTO CONC. SLAB,
12" DEEP
CONC.CURB
PER
CIVIL DWGS.

PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES
IN CONC. APRON FOR
GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP. CMU, PER PLAN
- SOLID GROUT

ALL CELLS
6" METAL BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC.
6"H x 6"W CONC. CURB

AT SIDES OF
TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
(3) 3"X1/4" STEEL PLATES

WELDED TO METAL DECK
6" DIA. HSS GATE POST
FILL SOLID w/ CONCRETE,
EMBED 3'-0" INTO CONC. FTG.

W/ 5/8" Ø x 6" ANCHOR,

PAINT PER PLAN

PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES
IN CONC. APRON FOR
GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP.

HSS GATE POST

PAINT PER PLAN
6" DIA. HSS GATE POST
FILL SOLID w/ CONCRETE,
EMBED 3'-0" INTO CONC. FTG.

W/ 5/8" DIA. x 6" ANCHOR,

PAINT PER PLAN
CMU WALLS 3
1'-6" TYP.
1'-6" TYP.

SLOPE: 1/8" PER FOOT
7'-4" 8'-6"
12'-0" 10'-0"
CONC. APRON SLAB

W/ REINFORCEMENT,

PER STRUCTURAL
(2) 4'-4" x 5'-8" STEEL GATES,
W/ 6" DIA. HSS GATE POST,
FILLED W/ CONC.;
EMBED 36" INTO
CONC. FTG.

PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES
IN CONC. APRON FOR
GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP.

CLCL
P-16

YARD HYDRANT LOCATION,
PROVIDE 3/4" WATER LINE,
COORD. W/ PLUMBING

CANE BOLT
"HOLD-OPEN" TABS

TRASH ENCLOSURE MATERIALS
ID MATERIAL MANUFACTURER COLOR NOTES 3
CMU BLOCK WILLAMETTE-GRAYSTONE CHARCOAL SPLIT FACE, 8x16x8; 8x8x8 AS NECESARY
CMU CAP WILLAMETTE-GRAYSTONE CHARCOAL 12x16x2
PT-2 PAINT SHERWIN-WILLIAMS- BLDG DB DARK GRAY,

GATES BODY
PT-3 PAINT SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
- BLDG DB BLUE, GATE

FRAMES & POSTS
CMU WALLS3

PEDESTRIAN

ACCESS DOOR,

W/ CORRUGATED METAL,

PAINTED PER PLAN

PROVIDE SIMILAR LOCKING

MECHANISM TO MAIN GATE

TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION
1 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
2 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
3 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
5 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
4 TRASH ENCLOSURE

PLAN/ ELEVATIONS
A9.0
SHEET NAME:

SHEET NUMBER:
2021 DB Franchising USA, LLC
REV: DATE: DESCRIPTION: c
1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100
PORTLAND, OR 97214
V. 503.552.9079
F. 503.241.7055
WWW.GNICHARCH.COM

AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
“The name DUTCH BROS. and all associated logos, distinctive designs, content, information, and other materials featured, displayed, contained herein, and made available by Dutch Bros., including but not limited to, the “look and feel” of the establishments and products, all text, images, colors, configurations, graphics, designs, illustrations, photographs, and pictures (collectively, the “Materials”) are owned by and/or licensed by DB Franchising USA, LLC and are protected by copyright, trademark, trade dress, patent, and/or other intellectual property rights and unfair competition laws under the United States and foreign laws.” Project No: CA-3004
Dutch Bros Coffee - New Freestanding Store
Sunrise Blvd & Douglas Rd
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
For: Dutch Bros Coffee
110 SW 4th Street
Grants Pass, OR 97526 DB-2550-A1

ISSUED FOR DESIGN
REVIEW: 12.08.2021
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 692 of 1447 ends

AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

WALK-UP WINODW MATERIAL BOARD

AWNINGS & DOORS - PAINT
MANUFACTURER: SCHERWIN-WILLIAMS
COLOR: BLDG DB GRAY DARK

ROOFING MATERIAL
MANUFACTURER: DURO-LAST
DL-60 - 60 MIL
COLOR: WHITE

CANOPY SOFFIT
MANUFACTURER: HEWN
PROFILE: NW SPRUCE

NATURAL & SEALED
COLOR: PER MFR.

CULTURED STONE
MANUFACTURER: ELDORADO STONE
PROFILE: LEDGECUT33
COLOR: PER MFR.

WINDOW SYSTEM
MANUFACTURER: KAWNEER OR SIMILAR
PROFILE: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
FINISH: CLEAR NO 14 / 17

FIBER CEMENT SIDING
MANUFACTURER: NICHIHA
PROFILE: ILLUMINATION
COLOR: BLDG DB BLUE

FIBER CEMENT SIDING
MANUFACTURER: NICHIHA
PROFILE: VINTAGEWOOD
COLOR: REDWOOD
STUCCO
MANUFACTURER: -
PROFILE: 3-COAT, ACRYLIC FINE

SAND FINISH
COLOR: DET640 TAWNY OWL
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 693 of 1447 ends

DUTCH BROS COFFEE
1,002 SQ. FT.

KEYED NOTES GENERAL NOTES
8"
3"
36"

SITE NOTES
NORTH
PLAN
1/32" = 1'-0" 0 8' 32' 64'
ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1
NORTH
PLAN
1/32" = 1'-0" 0 8' 32' 64'
SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 2

2.2 2.9

4.3 7.3

12.1 12.0

7.0 4.0

2.4 5.8

8.7 7.1

8.6 10.8

10.2 6.5

4.4 3.9

3.4 17.1

14.8 13.0

5.0 3.8

4.1 3.8

2.4 2.8

3.3 3.6

1.6 2.3

3.0 3.9

1.8 2.2

3.0 3.8

2.5 2.0

2.1 2.6

2.9 1.7

1.9 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.9

2.3 2.4

3.2 3.1

2.9 2.8

2.8 3.0

3.4 3.6

3.6 3.3

5.6 4.8

4.6 4.4

4.4 4.5

4.8 5.3

5.0 1.2

17.4 0.2

0.3 0.6

0.5 0.4

0.5 0.8

1.4 0.9

1.7 2.0

3.0 3.9

3.6 2.7

2.5 2.5

2.5 1.0

1.8 2.1

2.6 3.0

2.9 2.5

2.6 2.9

3.4 1.0

1.4 1.6

1.9 2.2

2.2 2.0

2.1 2.7

0.9 1.2

1.2 1.4

1.6 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.8 0.7

0.7 0.8

1.0 1.0

1.1 1.0

0.9 1.2

0.4 0.5

0.5 0.6

0.8 0.7

0.6 0.6

0.7 0.8

1.7 2.0

2.7 4.0

3.6 2.2

2.0 1.6

1.1 1.0

2.0 2.6

3.4 4.0

4.0 3.4

3.2 2.6

2.1 1.0

1.7 2.2

3.1 3.8

4.0 3.9

3.9 4.3

1.0 1.4

1.8 2.5

3.2 3.5

1.4 0.8

0.9 1.3

2.3 2.3

0.9 0.4

0.5 0.7

0.3 0.3

0.4 0.1

0.1 0.1 0.1

0.1 0.1

0.1 4.4

0.7 0.6

0.8 1.0

1.4 1.7

1.3 1.3

1.1 1.3

1.6 1.7

2.4 1.3

1.1 0.7

0.7 0.2

0.2 0.2

0.4 0.8

1.0 0.9

0.6 0.4

0.3 0.3

0.5 0.9

1.2 1.1

0.6 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.3 0.4

0.4 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.2 0.3

0.4 0.5

0.4 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.2 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

0.1 2.9

4.7 5.4

6.2 6.8

4.9 6.4

8.0 9.3

5.2 7.0

9.1 8.2

10.3 9.4 6.5

1.0 11.5

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.8 0.4

0.2 1.0

0.6 0.2

1.3 0.7

0.2 1.0

0.6 0.3

0.7 0.4

0.2 0.3

0.3 0.2

0.2 0.2

0.7 0.7

0.7 2.1

1.7 1.5

3.6 2.9

2.1 1.8

7.3 4.4

3.0 2.8

3.5 5.2

8.7 8.8

4.6 2.2

1.5 1.3

3.4 2.7

2.2 1.9

2.5 3.3

4.9 6.4

4.9 2.9

1.8 0.1 1.1

0.1 12.5
L6 @ 10'
L7 @ 10'
L7 @ 10'
L7 @ 10'
L7 @ 10'
L9 @ 10'L9 @ 10'
L9 @ 10'L9 @ 10'
L9 @ 10'L9 @ 10'
L9 @ 10'L9 @ 10'
P(T4) @ 22'
P(T3) @ 22'
P(T3) @ 22'
P(T3) @ 22'
P(T4) @ 22'
P(T4) @ 22'
L6 @ 10'
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
Drive Thru 4.7 fc 17.4 fc 1.2 fc 14.5:1 3.9:1
Drive Way 0.6 fc 2.9 fc 0.1 fc 29.0:1 6.0:1
Parking 1.7 fc 4.4 fc 0.1 fc 44.0:1 17.0:1
Trash 7.1 fc 11.5 fc 1.0 fc 11.5:1 7.1:1
Landscape 2.2 fc 12.5 fc 0.1 fc 125.0:1 22.0:1
Perimeter at Street 0.3 fc 1.3 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
Catalog Number
Symbol Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Lamp Lumens Per
Lamp Wattage
P(T4)
3 NLS Lighting NV-1-T4-48L-1-40K-UNVHSST4 OPTICS WITH BLACK HSS 9674 156 L9
8 DMF LIGHTING DRD5S-4R-10930 DRD5S-4R-10930 1015 11.8
L7
4 Self DRD5S-4R-10930 CROWN-L90-277V 830_BA110 LED 4200 40 L6
2 RAB LIGHTING INC. WPLED26-WPLED26/D10
(WALLPACK) - ALED26-
ALED26/D10 (AREA LIGHTER)

CAST FINNED METAL HOUSING,
MACHINED METAL HEAT SINK, 1
CIRCUIT BOARD WITH 1 LED,

MOLDED PLASTIC REFLECTOR WITH

SEMI-SPECULAR FINISH, CLEAR FLAT

GLASS LENS IN CAST BROWN
PAINTED METAL FRAME.

ONE WHITE MULTI-CHIP LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED),
TILTED 33-DEGREES FROM VERTICAL BASE-UP POSITION.

INPUT VOLTAGE TO THE LED DRIVERS. Facade, Government,
Harbor, Healthcare, Hospitality, Hotel, Industrial, Institutional, Library Manufacturing, Marine, Medical, Office, Parking, Parks, Pathway Pedestrian, Pool, Recreation, Residential, Retail, Site, Tunnel, Underpass, Utility, Walkway Warehouse, Water
Treatment, Direct, Emergency, Security
3474 30
P(T3)
3 NLS Lighting, LLC NV-1-T3-48L-1-40K-UNV T3 silicone optics 19184 156 A11

ELECTRICAL

SITE & PHOTOMETRIC
PLAN
SHEET NAME:

SHEET NUMBER:
2021 DB Franchising USA, LLC
REV: DATE: DESCRIPTION:

XX.XX.XX c
1001 SE SANDY BLVD, SUITE 100
PORTLAND, OR 97214
V. 503.552.9079
F. 503.241.7055
WWW.GNICHARCH.COM
AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY “The name DUTCH BROS. and all associated logos, distinctive designs, content, information, and other materials featured, displayed, contained herein, and made available by Dutch Bros., including but not limited to, the “look and feel” of the establishments and products, all text, images, colors, configurations, graphics, designs, illustrations, photographs, and pictures (collectively, the “Materials”) are owned by and/or licensed by DB Franchising USA, LLC and are protected by copyright, trademark, trade dress, patent, and/or other intellectual property rights and unfair competition laws under the United States and foreign laws.” 796 Merus Court
St. Louis, MO 63026
T 636.349.1600
F 636.349.1730
Project No: CA-3004
Dutch Bros Coffee - New Freestanding Store
Sunrise Blvd & Douglas Rd
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
For: Dutch Bros Coffee
110 SW 4th Street
Grants Pass, OR 97526 DB-2550-A1

ISSUED FOR DESIGN
REVIEW: 01.19.2022
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 694 of 1447 ends

DOUGLAS RD

LOW LANDSCAPE WALL
(BY OTHERS, REFER TO CIVIL ENG. PLANS)

STEEL EDGING
(3) MUH RIG
(6) MUH RIG
(7) JUN AUI
(2) BUX SUF
(1 RHA SOU

RIVER ROCK
COBBLE
(3) LAU XSA
(22) JUN AUI

FES SKB
(6) RHA SOU
(6) BUX SUF
(5) JUN AUI

COP KIR

FES SKB

BIO SOD

EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN

BIOFILTRATION
POND
3'-6" 17'-8"
5' 3'-6"

TRASH ENCLOSURE

STEEL EDGING

LOT LINE

PROPOSED DETENTION POND/VEGETATED SWALE
- 3:1 SLOPES MAX. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR

INFORMATION & DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

NAN HAR
(3) JUN AUI
(2) JUN AUI

FES SKB
(2) MUH RIG

FES SKB

NAN HAR
(6) JUN AUI
(1) PIS KEI
721.5 SF SHADE COVERAGE
75% SHADE INCLUDED
PARKING AREA 1
2,980 SF
PARKING AREA 2
798 SF
(1) PIS KEI
481 SF SHADE COVERAGE
50% SHADE INCLUDED
(1) PIS KEI
721.5 SF SHADE COVERAGE
75% SHADE INCLUDED

NAN HAR

NAN HAR
Scale 1" = 10'
0' 5' 10' 20'

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS NEAR ALL NEWLY-PLANTED TREES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF PAVING OR CURBS. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE "CENTURY" OR "DEEP-ROOT" 24" DEEP PANELS (OR EQUAL). BARRIERS SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE. INSTALL PANELS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE CONTRACTOR USE ROOT BARRIERS OF A TYPE THAT COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE THE ROOTBALL.

ROOT BARRIERS

MULCHES

LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL SITE AREA:

LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 4,145 SF
HARD SURFACE ALLOWED: 1,022 SF (25%)
HARD SURFACE PROVIDED: 402 SF

PLANT SIZE
TOTAL TREES PROVIDED: 5
24" BOX TREES REQUIRED (25%): 1
24" BOX TREES PROPOSED: 5 (100%)

EVERGREEN TREE
TOTAL TREES PROVIDED: 5
EVERGREEN TREES REQUIRED (30%): 1.2
EVERGREEN TREES PROVIDED: 5 (100%)
AFTER ALL PLANTING IS COMPLETE, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 3" LAYER OF HARDWOOD MULCH, NATURAL (UNDYED), IN ALL PLANTING AREAS (EXCEPT FOR TURF AREAS).

ABSOLUTELY NO EXPOSED GROUND SHALL BE LEFT SHOWING ANYWHERE ON THE PROJECT

AFTER MULCH HAS BEEN INSTALLED (SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GENERAL GRADING AND PLANTING NOTES" AND SPECIFICATIONS).

GENERAL PLANTING NOTES

1. BY SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCOPE OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR

CONFIRMS THAT HE HAS READ, AND WILL COMPLY WITH, THE ASSOCIATED NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS WITH THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ALL APPLICABLE JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE ELEMENTS AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS. UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE DESIGNER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN WORKIGN IN THE VICINITY OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.

4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL EXISTING VEGETATION (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED TO REMAIN).

5. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PLANTING. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY ARE MET (I.E., MINIMUM PLANT QUANTITIES, PLANTING METHODS, TREE PROTECTION METHODS, ETC.).
a. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PLANT QUANTITIES; PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ON LEGENDS AND CALLOUTS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. IN THE

EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLAN AND THE PLANT LEGEND, THE PLANT QUANTITY AS

SHOWN ON THE PLAN (FOR INDIVIDUAL SYMBOLS) OR CALLOUT (FOR GROUNDCOVER PATTERNS) SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE.
b. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF SOME OF THE PLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, THE LANDSCAPE

CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING (VIA PROPER CHANNELS).
c. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, PROVIDE REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOS OF ALL PLANTS PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO INSPECT, AND APPROVE OR REJECT, ALL PLANTS DELIVERED TO THE JOBSITE.

REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTALS.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPE IN A HEALTHY CONDITION FOR 90 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE FOR THE

START OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, AND FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD.

7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL WEED CONTROL LAYER PER SPECIFICATIONS IN ALL MULCH AND RIVER ROCK COBBLE AREAS.

8. NURSERY STAKES TO BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.

9. SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS. LP-1

LANDSCAPE
PLAN
BR
RM/BR
BR
(800) 680-6630
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com

EVERGREEN

D E S I G N G R O U P
“ “ ”
“ ” ”

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS CAL MATURE SIZE (W`XH`) QTY REMARKS LAU XSA LAURUS X 'SARATOGA' 24" BOX L 2" CAL 30` X 40` 3

SARATOGA HYBRID LAUREL
PIS KEI PISTACIA CHINENSIS 'KEITH DAVEY' 24" BOX L 2" CAL 40` X 40` 3

KEITH DAVEY CHINESE PISTACHE
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS MATURE SIZE (W`XH`) QTY BUX SUF BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS 'SUFFRUTICOSA' 5 GAL M 3X4 9

SUFFRUTICOSA COMMON BOXWOOD
JUN AUI JUNIPERUS X PFITZERIANA 'AUREA IMPROVED' 5 GAL L 3X4 45

GOLD COAST PFITZER JUNIPER
MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 5 GAL L 3X3 11

DEER GRASS
RHA SOU RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'RUTRHAPH1' TM 5 GAL L 5X6 6

SOUTHERN MOON YEDDA HAWTHORN
GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS MATURE SIZE (W`XH`) SPACING QTY BIO SOD BIOFILTRATION SOD TM SOD N/A 1X1 972 SF AVAILABLE FROM DELTA BLUE GRASS

DELTA BLUE GRASS
COP KIR COPROSMA KIRKII 1 GAL L 1`X6` 48" o.c. 25

CREEPING MIRROR PLANT
FES SKB FESTUCA X 'SISKIYOU BLUE' 1 GAL L 1X1 12" o.c. 947

SISKIYOU BLUE FESCUE
NAN HAR NANDINA DOMESTICA 'HARBOUR DWARF' 1 GAL L 1`X4` 36" o.c. 67

HARBOUR DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO
-- RIVER ROCK COBBLE N/A N/A 323 SF
1 1/2" - 3" SIZE, 4" DEEP

PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
TOTAL PARKING AREA: 3,778 SF
TOTAL SHADING REQUIRED (50%): 1,889 SF
PARKING LOT AREA 1: 2,980 SF
SHADE PROVIDED:
(1) CHINESE PISTACHE - 35' CANOPY - 75% SHADE VALUE - 721.5 SF COVERAGE (1) CHINESE PISTACHE - 35' CANOPY - 75% SHADE VALUE - 721.5 SF COVERAGE PARKING LOT AREA 2:

SHADE PROVIDED: 798 SF
CHINESE PISTACHE - 35' CANOPY - 50% SHADE VALUE - 481 SF COVERAGE TOTAL PARKING LOT SHADING PROVIDED: 1,924 SF (50.9%)

PARKING LOT SHADE CALCULATIONS
8-30-22
02-23-22
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 695 of 1447 ends

PLANT SPACING
C SCALE: NTS
4 X
2X
3 2
1 5
6 7
4 1
2 3
SHRUB, PERENNIAL, OR ORNAMENTAL GRASS.
3" MIN. DEPTH MULCH, TYPE AND DEPTH PER
PLANS. PLACE NO MORE THAN 1" OF MULCH
WITHIN 6" OF PLANT CENTER.

FINISH GRADE.

BACKFILL. AMEND AND FERTILIZE ONLY AS
RECOMMENDED IN SOIL FERTILITY ANALYSIS.

ROOT BALL.

UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.
3" HIGH EARTHEN WATERING BASIN.
5 6
7 SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING
B SCALE: NTS
8 WEED FABRIC UNDER MULCH.
8 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
4 TURF (WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN).
3 PLANT.
2 MULCH LAYER.
1 CURB.
1 2 3 4

OF MATURE CANOPY
24" MIN. TO EDGE

DISTANCE PER PLAN
E SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

PLANTING AT PARKING AREA

TREE PLANTING
A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
PLANT CENTER (TYP.) EQUAL
EQUAL
EQUAL

EDGE OF PLANTING AREA
EQUAL
NOTE: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL TRIANGULAR SPACING (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS AS INFORMAL GROUPINGS). REFER TO PLANT LEGEND FOR SPACING DISTANCE BETWEEN PLANTS. 1) STEP 1: DETERMINE TOTAL PLANTS FOR THE AREA WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULA:

TOTAL AREA / AREA DIVIDER = TOTAL PLANTS

PLANT SPACING AREA DIVIDER PLANT SPACING AREA DIVIDER
6" 0.22 18" 1.95
8" 0.39 24" 3.46
10" 0.60 30" 5.41
12" 0.87 36" 7.79
15" 1.35
2) STEP 2: SUBTRACT THE ROW (S) OF PLANTS THAT WOULD OCCUR AT THE EDGE OF THE PLANTED AREA WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH / PLANT SPACING = TOTAL PLANT SUBTRACTION EXAMPLE: PLANTS AT 18" O.C. IN 100 SF PLANTING AREA, 40 LF PERIMETER STEP 1: 100 SF/1.95 = 51 PLANTS
STEP 2: 51 PLANTS - (40 LF / 1.95 = 21 PLANTS) = 30 PLANTS TOTAL 5 6
7 4
1 8
9 11
10 12

PREVAILING
WINDS
NOTES:

1. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO SETTING TREE.

2. REMOVE EXCESS SOIL APPLIED ON TOP OF THE ROOTBALL THAT COVERS THE ROOT FLARE. THE PLANTING HOLE DEPTH SHALL BE

SUCH THAT THE ROOTBALL RESTS ON UNDISTURBED SOIL, AND THE ROOT FLARE IS 2"-4" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.

3. FOR B&B TREES, CUT OFF BOTTOM 1/3 OF WIRE BASKET BEFORE

PLACING TREE IN HOLE, CUT OFF AND REMOVE REMAINDER OF

BASKET AFTER TREE IS SET IN HOLE, REMOVE ALL NYLON TIES, TWINE, ROPE, AND OTHER PACKING MATERIAL. REMOVE AS MUCH BURLAP FROM AROUND ROOTBALL AS IS PRACTICAL.

4. REMOVE ALL NURSERY STAKES AFTER PLANTING.

5. FOR TREES 36" BOX/2.5" CAL. AND LARGER, USE THREE STAKES OR DEADMEN (AS APPROPRIATE), SPACED EVENLY AROUND TREE.

6. STAKING SHALL BE TIGHT ENOUGH TO PREVENT TRUNK FROM

BENDING, BUT LOOSE ENOUGH TO ALLOW SOME TRUNK MOVEMENT
IN WIND.

7. NURSERY STAKES SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. 1 2
3 TREE CANOPY.

CINCH-TIES (24" BOX/2" CAL. TREES AND SMALLER) OR
12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE WITH NYLON TREE
STRAPS AT TREE AND STAKE (36" BOX/2.5" CAL. TREES
AND LARGER). SECURE TIES OR STRAPS TO TRUNK
JUST ABOVE LOWEST MAJOR BRANCHES.

GREEN STEEL T-POSTS. EXTEND POSTS 12" MIN. INTO
UNDISTURBED SOIL.
24" X 3/4" P.V.C. MARKERS OVER WIRES.

PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD DEADMAN, TWO PER
TREE (MIN.). BURY OUTSIDE OF PLANTING PIT AND
18" MIN. INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL.
3" MIN. DEPTH MULCH, TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS. DO
NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 6" OF TRUNK.

FINISH GRADE.

BACKFILL. AMEND AND FERTILIZE ONLY AS
RECOMMENDED IN SOIL FERTILITY ANALYSIS.

ROOT BALL.

UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.
4" HIGH EARTHEN WATERING BASIN.

TRUNK FLARE.

CONIFEROUS
TREE

PREVAILING
WINDS

STAKING EXAMPLES (PLAN VIEW)
2 4
6 7
8 9
10 11
1 4
3X ROOTBALL DIA.
5 2
3 5
12 NON-CONIFEROUS
TREE
13 13 FINISH GRADE.

ROOT BARRIER - PLAN VIEW F SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

GENERAL
A. QUALIFICATIONS OF LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR

1. ALL LANDSCAPE WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SINGLE FIRM SPECIALIZING IN LANDSCAPE PLANTING.

2. A LIST OF SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED PROJECTS OF THIS TYPE, SIZE AND NATURE MAY BE REQUESTED BY THE OWNER FOR FURTHER QUALIFICATION MEASURES.

B. SCOPE OF WORK

1. WORK COVERED BY THESE SECTIONS INCLUDES THE FURNISHING AND PAYMENT OF ALL MATERIALS, LABOR,

SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, LICENSES, TAXES AND ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THE EXECUTION,

INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, SPECIFIED HEREIN AND / OR SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, NOTES, AND DETAILS.

2. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, CODES AND REGULATIONS

REQUIRED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH WORK, INCLUDING ALL INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS

REQUIRED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN SUPPLY, TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS.

3. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES (WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, TELEVISION, ETC.) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK.

PRODUCTS
A. ALL MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS SHALL BE NEW.

B. CONTAINER AND BALLED-AND-BURLAPPED PLANTS:

1. FURNISH NURSERY-GROWN PLANTS COMPLYING WITH THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014). PROVIDE WELL-SHAPED, FULLY BRANCHED, HEALTHY, VIGOROUS STOCK FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, EGGS, LARVAE, AND DEFECTS SUCH AS KNOTS, SUN SCALD, INJURIES, ABRASIONS, AND DISFIGUREMENT. ALL PLANTS WITHIN A SPECIES SHALL HAVE SIMILAR SIZE AND SHALL BE OF A FORM TYPICAL FOR THE SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE, AND WITH SIMILAR CLIMACTIC CONDITIONS.

2. ROOT SYSTEMS SHALL BE HEALTHY, DENSELY BRANCHED ROOT SYSTEMS, NON-POT-BOUND, FREE FROM ENCIRCLING AND/OR GIRDLING ROOTS, AND FREE FROM ANY OTHER ROOT DEFECTS (SUCH AS J-SHAPED ROOTS).

3. TREES MAY BE PLANTED FROM CONTAINERS OR BALLED-AND-BURLAPPED (B&B), UNLESS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANTING LEGEND. BARE-ROOT TREES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.

4. ANY PLANT DEEMED UNACCEPTABLE BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY

REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND SHALL BE REPLACED WITH AN ACCEPTBLE PLANT OF LIKE TYPE AND SIZE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN EXPENSE. ANY PLANTS APPEARING TO BE UNHEALTHY, EVEN IF DETERMINED TO STILL BE ALIVE, SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED. THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGES AS TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF PLANT MATERIAL.

5. ALL TREES SHALL BE STANDARD IN FORM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. TREES WITH CENTRAL LEADERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF LEADER IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED. PRUNE ALL DAMAGED TWIGS AFTER PLANTING.

6. CALIPER MEASUREMENTS FOR STANDARD (SINGLE TRUNK) TREES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: SIX INCHES ABOVE THE

ROOT FLARE FOR TREES UP TO AND INCLUDING FOUR INCHES IN CALIPER, AND TWELVE INCHES ABOVE THE ROOT FLARE FOR TREES EXCEEDING FOUR INCHES IN CALIPER.

7. MULTI-TRUNK TREES SHALL BE MEASURED BY THEIR OVERALL HEIGHT, MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. WHERE CALIPER MEASUREMENTS ARE USED, THE CALIPER SHALL BE CALCULATED AS ONE-HALF OF THE SUM OF THE CALIPER OF THE THREE LARGEST TRUNKS.

8. ANY TREE OR SHRUB SHOWN TO HAVE EXCESS SOIL PLACED ON TOP OF THE ROOT BALL, SO THAT THE ROOT FLARE HAS BEEN COMPLETELY COVERED, SHALL BE REJECTED.

C. TOPSOIL: SANDY TO CLAY LOAM TOPSOIL, FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN ½ INCH, FOREIGN MATTER, PLANTS, ROOTS, AND SEEDS.

D. COMPOST: WELL-COMPOSTED, STABLE, AND WEED-FREE ORGANIC MATTER, pH RANGE OF 5.5 TO 8; MOISTURE CONTENT 35 TO 55 PERCENT BY WEIGHT; 100 PERCENT PASSING THROUGH 3/4-INCH SIEVE; SOLUBLE SALT CONTENT OF 5 TO 10 DECISIEMENS/M; NOT EXCEEDING 0.5 PERCENT INERT CONTAMINANTS AND FREE OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC TO PLANTINGS. NO MANURE OR ANIMAL-BASED PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED.

E. FERTILIZER: GRANULAR FERTILIZER CONSISTING OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND OTHER NUTRIENTS IN

PROPORTIONS, AMOUNTS, AND RELEASE RATES RECOMMENDED IN A SOIL REPORT FROM A QUALIFIED SOIL-TESTING AGENCY (SEE BELOW).

F. MULCH: SIZE AND TYPE AS INDICATED ON PLANS, FREE FROM DELETERIOUS MATERIALS AND SUITABLE AS A TOP DRESSING OF TREES AND SHRUBS.

G. TREE STAKING AND GUYING

1. STAKES: 6' LONG GREEN METAL T-POSTS.

2. GUY AND TIE WIRE: ASTM A 641, CLASS 1, GALVANIZED-STEEL WIRE, 2-STRAND, TWISTED, 0.106 INCH DIAMETER.

3. STRAP CHAFING GUARD: REINFORCED NYLON OR CANVAS AT LEAST 1-1/2 INCH WIDE, WITH GROMMETS TO PROTECT TREE TRUNKS FROM DAMAGE.

I. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES: ANY GRANULAR, NON-STAINING PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE THAT IS LABELED FOR THE SPECIFIC ORNAMENTALS OR TURF ON WHICH IT WILL BE UTILIZED. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES SHALL BE APPLIED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S LABELED RATES.

METHODS
A. SOIL PREPARATION

1. BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE GRADE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE WITHIN +/-0.1' OF FINISH GRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST.

2. SOIL TESTING:
a. AFTER FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SOIL SAMPLES FROM THE PROJECT'S LANDSCAPE AREAS TESTED BY AN ESTABLISHED SOIL TESTING LABORATORY. EACH SAMPLE

SUBMITTED TO THE LAB SHALL CONTAIN NO LESS THAN ONE QUART OF SOIL, TAKEN FROM BETWEEN THE SOIL SURFACE AND 6" DEPTH. IF NO SAMPLE LOCATIONS ARE INDICATED ON THE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE A MINIMUM OF THREE SAMPLES FROM VARIOUS REPRESENTATIVE LOCATIONS FOR TESTING. b. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE SOIL TESTING LABORATORY PROVIDE RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING: SOIL TEXTURAL CLASS, GENERAL SOIL FERTILITY, pH, ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT, SALT (CEC), LIME, SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR) AND BORON CONTENT.
c. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO SUBMIT THE PROJECT'S PLANT LIST TO THE LABORATORY ALONG WITH THE SOIL SAMPLES.
d. THE SOIL REPORT PRODUCED BY THE LABORATORY SHALL CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING (AS APPROPRIATE): SEPARATE SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL MIX RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GENERAL

ORNAMENTAL PLANTS, XERIC PLANTS, TURF, AND NATIVE SEED, AS WELL AS PRE-PLANT FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANY OTHER SOIL RELATED ISSUES. THE REPORT SHALL ALSO PROVIDE A FERTILIZER PROGRAM FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD AND FOR LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZERS PER THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. ANY CHANGE IN COST DUE TO THE SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS, EITHER INCREASE OR DECREASE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER WITH THE REPORT.

4. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY, THE SOIL PREPARATION SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING:
a. TURF: INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS INTO THE TOP 8" OF SOIL BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLING AFTER CROSS-RIPPING:
i. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT - 4 CU. YDS. PER 1,000 S.F. ii. PREPLANT TURF FERTILIZER (10-20-10 OR SIMILAR, SLOW RELEASE, ORGANIC) - 15 LBS PER 1,000 S.F. iii. "CLAY BUSTER" OR EQUAL - USE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED RATE b. TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS: INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS INTO THE TOP 8" OF SOIL BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLING AFTER CROSS-RIPPING:
i. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT - 4 CU. YDS. PER 1,000 S.F. ii. 12-12-12 FERTILIZER (OR SIMILAR, ORGANIC, SLOW RELEASE) - 10 LBS. PER CU. YD. iii. "CLAY BUSTER" OR EQUAL - USE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED RATE iv. IRON SULPHATE - 2 LBS. PER CU. YD.

5. IN THE CONTEXT OF THESE PLANS, NOTES, AND SPECIFICATIONS, "FINISH GRADE" REFERS TO THE FINAL ELEVATION OF THE SOIL SURFACE (NOT TOP OF MULCH) AS INDICATED ON THE GRADING PLANS. a. BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE ROUGH GRADES OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE WITHIN +/-0.1' OF FINISH GRADE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE DETAILED INSTRUCTION ON TURF AREA AND PLANTING BED PREPARATION.
b. CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN FINISH GRADES AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLANS, AND CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN SLOPES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE

DRAINAGE AWAY FROM STRUCTURES AT THE MINIMUM SLOPE SPECIFIED IN THE REPORT AND ON THE GRADING

PLANS, AND AREAS OF POTENTIAL PONDING SHALL BE REGRADED TO BLEND IN WITH THE SURROUNDING GRADES AND ELIMINATE PONDING POTENTIAL.
c. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE EXPORT OF ANY SOIL WILL BE

NEEDED, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE ROUGH GRADE PROVIDED, THE AMOUNT OF SOIL AMENDMENTS TO BE ADDED (BASED ON A SOIL TEST, PER SPECIFICATIONS), AND THE FINISH GRADES TO BE ESTABLISHED. d. ENSURE THAT THE FINISH GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO WALKS AND OTHER WALKING SURFACES, AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS, IS 3" BELOW THE ADJACENT FINISH SURFACE, IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR PROPER MULCH DEPTH. TAPER THE SOIL SURFACE TO MEET FINISH GRADE, AS SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS, AT APPROXIMATELY 18" AWAY FROM THE WALKS. e. ENSURE THAT THE FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO WALKS AND OTHER WALKING SURFACES, AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS, IS 1" BELOW THE FINISH SURFACE OF THE WALKS. TAPER THE SOIL SURFACE TO MEET FINISH GRADE, AS SPECIFIED ON THE GRADING PLANS, AT APPROXIMATELY 18" AWAY FROM THE WALKS.
f. SHOULD ANY CONFLICTS AND/OR DISCREPANCIES ARISE BETWEEN THE GRADING PLANS, GEOTECHNICAL

REPORT, THESE NOTES AND PLANS, AND ACTUAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY BRING SUCH ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, OWNER, OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.

6. ONCE SOIL PREPARATION IS COMPLETE, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO DEBRIS, TRASH, OR STONES LARGER THAN 1" REMAINING IN THE TOP 6" OF SOIL.

B. SUBMITTALS

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUBMITTALS AND SAMPLES, IF REQUIRED, TO THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, AND RECEIVE APPROVAL IN WRITING FOR SUCH SUBMITTALS BEFORE WORK COMMENCES.

2. SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDE PHOTOS OF PLANTS WITH A RULER OR MEASURING STICK FOR SCALE, PHOTOS OR

SAMPLES OF ANY REQUIRED MULCHES, AND SOIL TEST RESULTS AND PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE

TESTING LAB (INCLUDING COMPOST AND FERTILIZER RATES AND TYPES, AND OTHER AMENDMENTS FOR TREE/SHRUB, TURF, AND SEED AREAS AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE).

3. SUBMITTALS SHALL ALSO INCLUDE MANUFACTURER CUT SHEETS FOR PLANTING ACCESSORIES SUCH AS TREE STAKES AND TIES, EDGING, AND LANDSCAPE FABRICS (IF ANY).

4. WHERE MULTIPLE ITEMS ARE SHOWN ON A PAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE THE ITEM BEING CONSIDERED.

C. GENERAL PLANTING

1. REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS AND STAKES FROM PLANTS.

2. EXCEPT IN AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH ORNAMENTAL GRASSES, APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES AT THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED RATE.

3. POSITION THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN THEIR INTENDED LOCATION AS PER THE PLAN. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF ALL POSITIONING OF PLANT MATERIALS.

4. TRENCHING NEAR EXISTING TREES:
a. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) OF EXISTING TREES, AND SHALL EXERCISE ALL POSSIBLE CARE AND PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID INJURY TO TREE ROOTS, TRUNKS, AND BRANCHES. THE CRZ IS DEFINED AS A CIRCULAR AREA EXTENDING OUTWARD FROM THE TREE TRUNK, WITH A RADIUS EQUAL TO 1' FOR EVERY 1" OF TRUNK DIAMETER-AT-BREAST-HEIGHT (4.5' ABOVE THE AVERAGE GRADE AT THE TRUNK).
b. ALL EXCAVATION WITHIN THE CRZ SHALL BE PERFORMED USING HAND TOOLS. NO MACHINE EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CRZ.
c. ALTER ALIGNMENT OF PIPE TO AVOID TREE ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER. WHERE TREE ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE FIELD, TUNNEL UNDER SUCH ROOTS. WRAP EXPOSED ROOTS WITH SEVERAL LAYERS OF BURLAP AND KEEP MOIST. CLOSE ALL TRENCHES WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINES WITHIN 24 HOURS.
d. ALL SEVERED ROOTS SHALL BE HAND PRUNED WITH SHARP TOOLS AND ALLOWED TO AIR-DRY. DO NOT USE ANY SORT OF SEALERS OR WOUND PAINTS.

D. TREE PLANTING

1. TREE PLANTING HOLES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO MINIMUM WIDTH OF TWO TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL, AND TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL LESS TWO TO FOUR INCHES.

2. SCARIFY THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE PLANTING HOLE PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE TREE. REMOVE ANY GLAZING THAT MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED DURING THE EXCAVATION OF THE HOLE.

3. FOR CONTAINER AND BOX TREES, TO REMOVE ANY POTENTIALLY GIRDLING ROOTS AND OTHER ROOT DEFECTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SHAVE A 1" LAYER OFF OF THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL OF ALL TREES JUST BEFORE PLACING INTO THE PLANTING PIT. DO NOT "TEASE" ROOTS OUT FROM THE ROOTBALL.

4. INSTALL THE TREE ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SO THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL IS TWO TO FOUR INCHES ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GRADE.

5. BACKFILL THE TREE HOLE UTILIZING THE EXISTING TOPSOIL FROM ON-SITE. ROCKS LARGER THAN 1" DIA. AND ALL OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SOIL PRIOR TO THE BACKFILL. SHOULD ADDITIONAL SOIL BE

REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS TASK, USE STORED TOPSOIL FROM ON-SITE OR IMPORT ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL FROM OFF-SITE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL BE OF SIMILAR TEXTURAL CLASS AND COMPOSITION IN THE ON-SITE SOIL.

6. TREES SHALL NOT BE STAKED UNLESS THE JURISDICTION OR LOCAL CONDITIONS (SUCH AS HEAVY WINDS OR SLOPES) REQUIRE STAKES TO KEEP TREES UPRIGHT. SHOULD STAKING BE REQUIRED, THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREE STAKES (BEYOND THE MINIMUMS LISTED BELOW) WILL BE LEFT TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION.

SHOULD ANY TREES FALL OR LEAN, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL STRAIGHTEN THE TREE, OR REPLACE IT SHOULD IT BECOME DAMAGED. TREE STAKING SHALL ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES:
a. 1"-2" TREES (OR #15 GAL - 24” BOX): TWO STAKES PER TREE b. 2-1/2"-4" TREES (OR 36” - 48” BOX): THREE STAKES PER TREE c. TREES OVER 4" CALIPER (OR >48” BOX): GUY AS NEEDED
d. MULTI-TRUNK TREES: THREE STAKES PER TREE MINIMUM, QUANTITY AND POSITIONS AS

NEEDED TO STABILIZE THE TREE

7. UPON COMPLETION OF PLANTING, CONSTRUCT AN EARTH WATERING BASIN AROUND THE TREE. COVER THE INTERIOR OF THE TREE RING WITH MULCH (TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS).

8. FOR TREES IN TURF AREAS, DO NOT PLANT GRASS ALL THE WAY TO THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. LEAVE THE AREA OVER THE ROOT BALL AND INSTALL MULCH WITH AT LEAST 2” OF SPECIFIED MULCH. SEE MULCH SPECIFICATION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

E. SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING

4. DIG THE PLANTING HOLES TWICE AS WIDE AND 2" LESS DEEP THAN EACH PLANT'S ROOTBALL. INSTALL THE PLANT IN THE HOLE. BACKFILL AROUND THE PLANT WITH SOIL AMENDED PER SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS.

5. INSTALL THE WEED BARRIER CLOTH, OVERLAPPING IT AT THE ENDS. UTILIZE STEEL STAPLES TO KEEP THE WEED BARRIER CLOTH IN PLACE.

6. WHEN PLANTING IS COMPLETE, INSTALL MULCH (TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS) OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS, COVERING THE ENTIRE PLANTING AREA.

I. MULCH

6. INSTALL MULCH TOPDRESSING, TYPE AND DEPTH PER MULCH NOTE, IN ALL PLANTING AREAS AND TREE RINGS.

7. DO NOT INSTALL MULCH WITHIN 6" OF TREE ROOT FLARE. MULCH AT THE BASE OF SHRUBS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM 1”

DEPTH OVER ROOT BALL

8. MULCH COVER WITHIN 6" OF CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBS SHALL NOT PROTRUDE ABOVE THE FINISH SURFACE OF THE WALKS AND CURBS. FINISH GRADE OF MULCH AT CURBS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 1” LOWER THAN THE ADJACENT CURB OR SIDEWALK. MULCH COVER WITHIN 12" OF WALLS SHALL BE AT LEAST 3" LOWER THAN THE TOP OF WALL.

J. CLEAN UP

1. DURING LANDSCAPE PREPARATION AND PLANTING, KEEP ALL PAVEMENT CLEAN AND ALL WORK AREAS IN A NEAT, ORDERLY CONDITION.

2. DISPOSED LEGALLY OF ALL EXCAVATED MATERIALS OFF THE PROJECT SITE.

K. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

1. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE SITE CLEAN, FREE OF DEBRIS AND TRASH, AND SUITABLE FOR USE AS INTENDED. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN REQUEST AN INSPECTION BY THE OWNER TO DETERMINE FINAL ACCEPTABILITY.

2. WHEN THE INSPECTED PLANTING WORK DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE AND/OR REPAIR THE REJECTED WORK TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION WITHIN 24 HOURS.

3. THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PERIOD WILL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE LANDSCAPE WORK HAS BEEN RE-INSPECTED BY THE OWNER AND FOUND TO BE ACCEPTABLE. AT THAT TIME, A WRITTEN NOTICE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE ISSUED BY THE OWNER, AND THE MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE PERIODS WILL COMMENCE.

L. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS FOR 90 DAYS BEYOND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE WORK BY THE OWNER. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WEEKLY SITE VISITS FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS (AS APPROPRIATE): PROPER

PRUNING, RESTAKING OF TREES, RESETTING OF PLANTS THAT HAVE SETTLED, MOWING AND AERATION OF LAWNS,

WEEDING, TREATING FOR INSECTS AND DISEASES, REPLACEMENT OF MULCH, REMOVAL OF LITTER, REPAIRS TO THE

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DUE TO FAULTY PARTS AND/OR WORKMANSHIP, AND THE APPROPRIATE WATERING OF ALL PLANTINGS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER, WITH SCHEDULING ADJUSTMENTS BY SEASON TO MAXIMIZE WATER CONSERVATION.

2. SHOULD SEEDED AND/OR SODDED AREAS NOT BE COVERED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THE LANDSCAPE

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING THESE AREAS AND OBTAINING A FULL, HEALTHY STAND OF PLANTS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

3. TO ACHIEVE FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST OCCUR:
i. THE LANDSCAPE SHALL SHOW ACTIVE, HEALTHY GROWTH (WITH EXCEPTIONS MADE FOR SEASONAL DORMANCY). ALL PLANTS NOT MEETING THIS CONDITION SHALL BE REJECTED AND REPLACED BY HEALTHY PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
j. ALL HARDSCAPE SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. k. SODDED AREAS MUST BE ACTIVELY GROWING AND MUST REACH A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 1 1/2 INCHES BEFORE FIRST MOWING. BARE AREAS LARGER THAN TWELVE SQUARE INCHES MUST BE RESODDED (AS APPROPRIATE) PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. ALL SODDED TURF SHALL BE NEATLY MOWED.

M. WARRANTY PERIOD, PLANT GUARANTEE AND REPLACEMENTS

1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL TREES, SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, SOD, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE OWNER'S FINAL ACCEPTANCE (90 DAYS FOR ANNUAL PLANTS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE AND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ANY

PLANTS WHICH DIE IN THAT TIME, OR REPAIR ANY PORTIONS OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WHICH OPERATE IMPROPERLY.

2. AFTER THE INITIAL MAINTENANCE PERIOD AND DURING THE GUARANTEE PERIOD, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR

SHALL ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS WHEN PLANT DEATH CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED DIRECTLY TO OVERWATERING OR OTHER DAMAGE BY HUMAN ACTIONS.

N. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF (2) COPIES OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. A RECORD

DRAWING IS A RECORD OF ALL CHANGES THAT OCCURRED IN THE FIELD AND THAT ARE DOCUMENTED THROUGH CHANGE ORDERS, ADDENDA, OR CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT DRAWING MARKUPS.

TYPICAL CURB AND GUTTER

TYPICAL PLANTING AREA
LINEAR ROOT BARRIER MATERIAL. SEE

PLANTING NOTES FOR TYPE AND
MANUFACTURER. INSTALL PER
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

TREE CANOPY

TREE TRUNK
1 TYPICAL WALKWAY OR PAVING
2 3
4 5
6 1
4 2
3 5
6 5' 5' 5' 5'

OPEN LANDSCAPE
TO 10'

PARKWAY

OR ISLAND
NOTES:
1) INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS NEAR ALL

NEWLY-PLANTED TREES THAT ARE LOCATED
WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF PAVING OR CURBS.
2) BARRIERS SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY
ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE. UNDER NO

CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE CONTRACTOR

USE ROOT BARRIERS OF A TYPE THAT
COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE THE ROOTBALL.

BR
RM/BR
BR
(800) 680-6630
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com

EVERGREEN
D E S I G N G R O U P LP-2
“ “ ”
“ ” ”

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
4 FINISH GRADE.
4 3
2 1
NOTES:
1) INSTALL EDGING SO THAT STAKES WILL BE ON INSIDE OF PLANTING BED. 2) BOTTOM OF EDGING SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 1" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 3) TOP OF MULCH SHALL BE 1" LOWER THAN TOP OF EDGING.
3 MULCH, TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS.
2 TAPERED STEEL STAKES.
1 ROLLED-TOP STEEL EDGING PER PLANS.

D SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

STEEL EDGING
8-30-22
02-23-22 LANDSCAPE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 696 of 1447 ends

DOUGLAS RD

LOT LINE

LOT LINE
3/4" BALL VALVE
3/4" R.P. ASSEMBLY
3/4" MASTER VALVE /

FLOW SENSOR
M
C
R

CONTROLLER SHALL BE PLACED
INSIDE OF ELECTRICAL ROOM.

SEE CONTROLLER NOTE.
2 4.0
1"

3.5 5
1"
1 1
3/4
1 DRIP
DRIP

3.5 3
DRIP 1"
3/4
6 3.5
1" DRIP
4 10.8
1"
1 3/4
10 3.0
1" DRIP
3/4
11 1.0
1" TREE

4.0 8
DRIP 1"

2.0 TREE 1"
7 10.8
1"
1 1
1 3.0
1" TREE
QC
QC
QC
1 1
1 1
1 1

2.0 12
DRIP 1"
BP
1 Scale 1" = 10'
0' 5' 10' 20' LI-1

LANDSCAPE
PLAN
BR
RM/BR
BR
(800) 680-6630
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com

EVERGREEN

D E S I G N G R O U P
“ “ ”
“ ” ”

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN 8-30-22
02-23-22

POINT OF CONNECTION
CONNECT MAINLINE DOWNSTREAM OF 3/4" WATER
METER (BY OTHERS). VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.

CONTROLLER NOTE
LOCATE CONTROLLER AT LOCATION SHOWN ON PLAN. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
120 VAC POWER TO CONTROLLER LOCATION IS NOT WITHIN THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR'S SCOPE OF WORK, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.

HOOK-UP OF CONTROLLER TO 120 VAC SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE

LOCATION OF WIRE SLEEVE PENETRATIONS THROUGH BUILDING WITH OWNER AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. STATION RUN ORDER SHALL MATCH PLANS.

IRRIGATION DISCLAIMER
THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPING, VALVES, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS OR

OUT OF PROPERTY BOUNDARIES ARE FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES OR LIMITS INDICATED ON PLAN. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL

VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL ABOVE-GRADE IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITH THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, OR IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQURED TO MOVE SUCH ITEMS AT HIS OWN COST.

IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL FINAL QUANTITIES PER DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ANY QUANTITIES PROVIDED ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO THE CONTRACTOR ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ABSOLUTE.

IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING SLEEVES FOR ALL PIPING UNDER ROADWAYS AND WALKWAYS, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVES FOR ALL CONTROLLER WIRES OCCURRING UNDER ALL ROADWAYS AND WALKWAYS. SLEEVES FOR CONTROLLER WIRES SHALL BE 2" DIA. AND CONTAIN NO MORE THAN 25 WIRES. FOR PLAN CLARITY, ONLY SOME REPRESENTATIVE SLEEVES ARE SHOWN; SOME SLEEVES MAY NOT BE SHOWN.

SLEEVING / WIRING NOTES:

RAINBIRD PEB SERIES ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL, "TREE BUBBLER ZONE" VALVE SEE INSTALLATION NOTE #N-5 REGARDING TREE BUBBLER LATERAL PIPE

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: CLASS 200
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: SCHEDULE 40 PVC
IRRIGATION SLEEVE, SCH. 40 PVC, MIN. TWICE SIZE OF PIPE TO BE INSERTED IRRIGATION SLEEVES, SCH. 40 PVC, MIN. TWICE SIZE OF PIPE TO BE INSERTED NOTE:

RAINBIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM / 150-PRB-COM SERIES AUTOMATIC DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY WITH 40 PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR XCZ-100-PRB-COM - 1" BALL VALVE WITH 1" PESB VALVE AND 1" PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI QUICK-CHECK BASKET FILTER. 0.3GPM TO 20GPM.

FLOW RANGE: 15-62GPM.

XCZ-150-PRB-LCDR - 1-1/2" PESB-R SCRUBBER GLOBE VALVE WITH SINGLE 1-1/2" PRESSURE REGULATING (40PSI) QUICK-CHECK BASKET FILTERS. #"
#
Valve Number
Valve Size
Valve Flow
Valve Callout
#

VALVE KEY
*** ALL PIPE TO BE SIZED SUCH THAT FLOWS WILL NOT EXCEED VELOCITY OF 5 FPS ***

REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SHRUB PLACEMENT
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21
PVC CLASS 200 IRRIGATION PIPE. ONLY LATERAL
TRANSITION PIPE SIZES 1" AND ABOVE ARE INDICATED
ON THE PLAN, WITH ALL OTHERS BEING 3/4" IN SIZE.

AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAINBIRD XFS-CV-06-12 SERIES DRIP TUBE IN SHRUB BED INSTALLED AT 2" DEPTH LASCO "V101N" SERIES SCH. 80 PVC TRUE UNION BALL VALVE, MAINLINE SIZE ZURN / WILKINS 375XLB SERIES REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR INSTALLED PER CITY CODE WITH SAME SIZE BRONZE BALL VALVE INSTALLED ON THE UP-STREAM SIDE.

M IRRIGATION WATER METER AND TAP, SIZE AS NOTED ON THE PLAN C RAINBIRD ESP12LXMEF SERIES AUTOMATIC WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER WITH ONE ESPLXMSM8 STATION MODULE AND WR2-RFC RAIN / FREEZE SENSOR LOCATE SENSOR AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT QC RAINBIRD 33-DNP QUICK COUPLING VALVE WITH 3/4" PVC BALL VALVE "MASTER" ELECTRIC VALVE ( SAME SIZE AS METER ) WITH RAINBIRD FLOW SENSOR MODEL #FS100B SERIES MOUNTED IN STRONGBOX SMOOTH TOUCH ENCLOSURE.

RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-PRS SERIES POP UP SPRAY HEADS WITH ADAPTER AND RAINBIRD #1402 SERIES BUBBLER NOZZLES@ 25psi. ( TWO PER TREE ) SEE INSTALLATION NOTE #N-5 REGARDING TREE BUBBLER LATERAL PIPE IRRIGATION_LEGEND
RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-PRS SERIES 12H POP UP SPRAY HEAD WITH U-SERIES NOZZLE AT 25 PSI.

Rain Bird D Series "VERTICAL PUMP STATION" 3hp Providing 15 gpm @ 20psi boost. BP BOOST ON DISCHARGE SIDE OF PUMP SHALL BE 55 PSI MINIMUM.

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 697 of 1447 ends

BR
RM/BR
BR
(800) 680-6630
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com

EVERGREEN
D E S I G N G R O U P LI-2
“ “ ”
“ ” ”

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
8-30-22
02-23-22 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
CONTROL ZONE KIT N.T.S.

DRIP TUBE N.T.S.

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE N.T.S.

DRIP END FEED LAYOUT

DRIP CENTER FEED LAYOUT

DRIP ISLAND LAYOUT
MANUAL LINE FLUSH VALVE N.T.S. DRIP ZONE INDICATOR N.T.S.

N.T.S.

WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER N.T.S.
8 10
5 6
2 9
7 4
3 1 PAVEMENT SURFACE

TRENCH BACKFILL
SCH. 40 PVC MAINLINE SLEEVE - SEE PLANS FOR SIZE
SCH. 40 PVC LATERAL SLEEVE - SEE PLANS FOR SIZE

LOCATOR WIRE W/BURIED CAUTION TAPE

PVC IRRIGATION MAINLINE

SLEEVING

TRENCHING
2 3
5 10 11
1 3
4 6
9 8 7

FINISH GRADE

PVC IRRIGATION LATERAL

SAND BACKFILL
SCH. 40 PVC WIRE SLEEVE FOR CONTROL WIRES, MIN. 2" DIA. 11 CONTROL WIRES - TAPE TO MAINLINE AT 10' INTERVALS 18" MIN. 24" MIN. 12" MIN. 18" MIN. 1 18" MIN. 24" MIN.
2 24" MAX 18" MIN. 24" MAX
9 8 7
12 PVC CAP, SOLVENT WELDED
4" MIN.
12 TYP.
2 12" SUMP
DEPTH
12" DIA.

GRAVEL FILL

SUMP PIT
1 2
NOTE:

AUTOMATIC VALVES ARE TO BE LOCATED
AT LOW POINTS OF LATERAL LINES.

LOCATE END DRAIN VALVE 12"
UPSTREAM FROM LAST HEAD.

PIPE TRENCH
1 FINISH GRADE
45d TO 30d GAP BELOW

HORIZONTAL
3 3 LATERAL LINE PIPE
4 AUTOMATIC DRAIN VALVE
4 AUTOMATIC DRAIN VALVE N.T.S.

PIPE AND SLEEVE INSTALLATION N.T.S.

WATER TAP DIAGRAM N.T.S.

CITY MAINLINE
5 ISOLATION VALVE (PER PLAN)

WATER METER

SERVICE LINE
2 TAP
3 4
1 8 BACKFLOW DEVICE (WHERE SHOWN)
6 7 BLOW OFF VALVE (BOV)

MANUAL DRAIN VALVE (BALL VALVE)
WINTERIZATION PROCEDURE:

1. TURN OFF EITHER THE METER AND ISOLATION

VALVE (DEDICATED IRRIGATION METER) OR
ISOLATION VALVE (DOMESTIC TAP).

2. OPEN ONE CONTROL VALVE TO RELIEVE

PRESSURE

3. SLOWLY OPEN MANUAL DRAIN VALVE.

4. REPEAT PROCEDURE FOR ALL MANUAL DRAIN
VALVES ALONG IRRIGATION MAINLINE.

5. CLOSE MANUAL DRAIN VALVES AND BLOW OUT
REMAINING WATER FROM THE BLOWOUT VALVE.

SLOWLY INCREASE AIR PRESSURE, NOT TO
EXCEED 80 PSI. DO NOT BLOWOUT SYSTEM
FROM BACKFLOW. BLOWOUT SYSTEM TWICE
BUT NOT TO EXCEED AT MORE THAN 2 MIN.

INTERVALS.

M
M

DEDICATED IRRIGATION TAP

IRRIGATION CONNECTION FROM DOMESTIC WATER
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
TO

IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TO

DOMESTIC
SYSTEM

TO IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
1 2
3 4
6 7 8
5 BOV
BOV
RP DEVICE N.T.S.

RAIN SENSOR, ROOF MOUNT N.T.S. RP DEVICE WITH ENCLOSURE N.T.S. 2 1
1 2

PARAPET OR EAVE

AUTOMATIC RAIN SENSOR -

INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S

INSTRUCTIONS
TREE BUBBLER N.T.S. TREE BUBBLER N.T.S.

N.T.S.

QUICK COUPLER VALVE WITH PVC BALL VALVE
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 698 of 1447 ends

BR
RM/BR
BR
(800) 680-6630
11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92505
www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com

EVERGREEN
D E S I G N G R O U P LI-3
“ “ ”
“ ” ”

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
8-30-22
02-23-22 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILSIRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS

GENERAL
A. QUALIFICATIONS OF IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR

1. ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SINGLE IRRIGATION CONTRACTING FIRM SPECIALIZING IN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. SEE THE IRRIGATION PLAN FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEM LAYOUT.

2. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE ON ITS STAFF A LICENSED IRRIGATION INSTALLER, AS REGULATED BY THE APPROPRIATE LOCAL JURISDICTION. A LICENSED

IRRIGATION INSTALLER SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES AS WORK IS IN PROGRESS. THE OWNER MAY DEMAND THAT WORK STOP UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR

PROVIDES FOR A LICENSED IRRIGATION INSTALLER TO BE PRESENT AT THE PROJECT SITE AND SUPERVISING ALL IRRIGATION WORK.

3. A LIST OF SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED PROJECTS OF THIS TYPE, SIZE AND NATURE MAY BE REQUESTED BY THE OWNER FOR FURTHER QUALIFICATION MEASURES.

B. SCOPE OF WORK

1. WORK COVERED BY THESE SECTIONS INCLUDES THE FURNISHING AND PAYMENT OF ALL

MATERIALS, LABOR, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, LICENSES, TAXES, FEES, AND ANY OTHER ITEMS

THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THE EXECUTION, INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, SPECIFIED HEREIN AND/OR SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION PLANS, NOTES, AND DETAILS.

2. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, CODES AND

REGULATIONS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH WORK,

INCLUDING ALL INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN SUPPLY, TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. IN CASE OF

CONFLICT BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND LOCAL AND/OR STATE CODES, CODES SHALL PREVAIL.

3. THE INTENT OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE 100% COVERAGE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC; COORDINATE IRRIGATION INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. ACTUAL LOCATION OF CONTROLLER,

BACKFLOW DEVICE, PIPING, VALVES, SPRAY HEADS, DRIP IRRIGATION, AND RELATED EQUIPMENT MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED BASED ON ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS.

4. FOR CLARITY PURPOSES, SOME IRRIGATION LINES AND EQUIPMENT ARE SHOWN IN HARDSCAPE AREAS WITHOUT ACCESS SLEEVES; THESE LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A COMMON TRENCH OR AT THE BACK OF CURB IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. MINOR FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

PRODUCTS
A. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND WITHOUT FLAWS OR DEFECTS OF ANY TYPE AND SHALL BE THE BEST OF THEIR CLASS AND KIND. ALL MATERIALS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM GUARANTEE OF ONE YEAR AGAINST MATERIAL DEFECTS OR DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE

OF THE BRANDS AND TYPES NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS OR AS SPECIFIED HEREIN, OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FIRST OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE IRRIGATION DESIGNER FOR

AN 'APPROVED EQUAL' BEFORE INSTALLING SUCH MATERIALS IN THE FIELD, OR THE CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO REPLACE SUCH MATERIALS AT HIS OWN COST.

B. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES SHALL BE OF THE SIZE AND TYPE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.

INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTION UNITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH IRRIGATION CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES.

C. PIPING

1. PRESSURE SUPPLY LINES, DOWNSTREAM OF THE POINT-OF-CONNECTION:
a. SCHEDULE 40 PVC FOR ALL PIPE 1-1/2" OR LESS
b. CLASS 315 PVC FOR ALL PIPE 2" TO 2-1/2"
c. CLASS 200 PVC, GASKETED, FOR ALL PIPE 3" AND LARGER

2. SLEEVING AND NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINES (DOWNSTREAM FROM VALVES): CLASS 200 PVC

3. FITTINGS: SCH. 40 PVC, EXCEPT AS NOTED OTHERWISE.

D. VALVES AND DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLIES: TYPE AND SIZE AS NOTED ON PLANS. EACH VALVE SHALL

BEAR A PRE-MANUFACTURED, NUMBERED WATERPROOF TAG BEARING A NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO ITS VALVE SEQUENCE OF OPERATION ON THE CONTROLLER. THE OPERATION SEQUENCE SHALL MATCH THAT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

E. QUICK COUPLERS, BALL VALVES, AND GATE VALVES: TYPE AND SIZE PER PLANS.

F. VALVE BOXES: TYPE AND SIZE AS NOTED ON DETAILS. ALL VALVES BOXES SHALL BE LOCKING BOLT-DOWN TYPE, FURNISHED WITH LIDS AND BOLTS. BOXES SHALL BE OF A SIZE TO CONTAIN THE ENTIRE VALVE AND/OR VALVE ASSEMBLY. THE VALVE BOX LID SHALL HAVE THE VALVE STATION NUMBER HEAT-BRANDED INTO THE LID WITH 2" HIGH LETTERS.

G. FIXED SPRAY HEADS AND ROTORS: PLASTIC BODY POP-UP, WITH A REMOVABLE PLASTIC SPRAY NOZZLE. EXACT TYPE, MODEL, AND NOZZLE SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON PLANS.

H. INTEGRAL EMITTER DRIP TUBING: TUBING MODEL AND FLOW RATE AS NOTED ON PLANS, WITH

INTEGRAL EMITTERS WELDED TO THE INSIDE WALL OF THE TUBING AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE TUBING ASSEMBLY.

I. AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER: TYPE AND MODEL PER PLANS. PROVIDE VANDAL-PROOF ENCLOSURE FOR ALL EXTERIOR INSTALLATIONS. PROVIDE LINE-VOLTAGE DISCONNECT SWITCH WITH GROUND FAULT PROTECTION.

J. 24 VOLT VALVE WIRE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF #14 GAUGE, U.F. APPROVED FOR DIRECT BURIAL, SINGLE CONDUCTOR IRRIGATION WIRE. EACH CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE A DIFFERENT COLOR STATION AND COMMON WIRE.

1. STATION WIRE - ANY COLOR EXCEPT WHITE OR BLUE

2. COMMON WIRE - WHITE

3. EXTRA COMMON WIRES - BLUE
K. WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE ENCASED IN A WATERPROOF COMPOUND OR GEL. ALL FIELD SPLICES SHALL BE LOCATED IN A 6 INCH ROUND VALVE BOX.

L. RAIN SENSOR: TYPE AND MODEL PER PLANS.

METHODS
A. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPING, VALVES, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN

PAVED AREAS OR OUT OF PROPERTY BOUNDARIES ARE FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY, AND

SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES OR LIMITS INDICATED ON PLAN. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL ABOVE-GRADE

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITH THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO

INSTALLATION, OR IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQURED TO MOVE SUCH ITEMS AT HIS OWN COST. ENSURE FIELD COORDINATION IS MADE EARLY ON IN THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE SO PLACEMENT LOCATION IS CORRECT.

B. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO

COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, AND SHALL OBTAIN ALL ENGINEERING, LANDSCAPE, AND OTHER APPLICABLE PLANS & DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY REVIEW THE PLANS

AND REPORT ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY.

C. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN

ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADES OR DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN THE ENGINEEERING. SUCH

OBSTRUCTIONS OR DIFFERENCES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE IRRIGATION DESIGNER. IN THE EVENT THAT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS AND NECESSARY COSTS.

D. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ANY AND ALL FEES AND PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.

E. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK, CONFIRM THE STATIC WATER PRESSURE IS AT LEAST 65 PSI. IF STATIC WATER PRESSURE IS OUTSIDE OF THE STATED RANGE, DO NOT PROCEED

WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFYING THE IRRIGATION DESIGNER AND OWNER IN WRITING, AND OBTAINING SUBSEQUENT DIRECTION FOR CORRECTIONAL MEASURES. SHOULD THE IRRIGATION

CONTRACTOR CHOOSE TO BEGIN THE INSTALLATION WITHOUT SUCH NOTIFICATION, THE

IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED TO ENSURE THE SYSTEM IS WORKING PROPERLY. NO CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE AUTHORIZED IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES.

F. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES (WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, TELEVISION, ETC.) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATIONS OF WALLS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES.

G. COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AND ANY REQUIRED SLEEVES THROUGH THE BUILDING FOR CONTROL WIRES.

H. TRENCHING NEAR EXISTING TREES:

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER WITHIN THE

CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) OF EXISTING TREES, AND SHALL EXERCISE ALL POSSIBLE CARE AND PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID INJURY TO TREE ROOTS, TRUNKS, AND BRANCHES. THE CRZ IS

DEFINED AS A CIRCULAR AREA EXTENDING OUTWARD FROM THE TREE TRUNK, WITH A RADIUS EQUAL TO 1' FOR EVERY 1" OF TRUNK DIAMETER-AT-BREAST-HEIGHT (4.5' ABOVE THE AVERAGE GRADE AT THE TRUNK).

2. ALL EXCAVATION WITHIN THE CRZ SHALL BE PERFORMED USING HAND TOOLS. NO MACHINE EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CRZ.

3. ALTER ALIGNMENT OF PIPE TO AVOID TREE ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER. WHERE TREE ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE FIELD, TUNNEL UNDER SUCH ROOTS. WRAP EXPOSED ROOTS WITH SEVERAL LAYERS OF BURLAP AND KEEP MOIST. CLOSE ALL TRENCHES WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINES WITHIN 24 HOURS.

4. ALL SEVERED ROOTS SHALL BE HAND PRUNED WITH SHARP TOOLS AND ALLOWED TO AIR-DRY. DO NOT USE ANY SORT OF SEALERS OR WOUND PAINTS.

I. BACKFILL

1. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE FROM RUBBISH, ROCK LARGER THAN 1", LARGE STONES, BRUSH,

SOD, FROZEN MATERIAL OR OTHER UNSUITABLE SUBSTANCES THAT MAY DAMAGE PIPE DURING THE BACKFILLING OPERATIONS. SEPARATE OUT ROCKS LARGER THAN 1 INCH IN

ANY DIRECTION FROM EXCAVATED MATERIAL, AND REMOVE FROM AREAS TO RECEIVE LANDSCAPING. COVER FOR BOTH TOP AND SIDES OF PIPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES OF ROCK-FREE SOIL, SAND, OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL.

2. IN THE EVENT THAT THE MATERIAL FROM THE EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING IS FOUND TO BE

UNSUITABLE FOR USE IN BACKFILL, IT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERLY AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN PURCHASE AND AND FURNISH SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL

CONSISTING OF EARTH, LOAM, SANDY CLAY, SAND OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIALS FREE OF DEBRIS.

J. BACKFLOW PREVENTER INSTALLATION: CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING

WATER SOURCES AT LOCATION SHOWN ON PLANS AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER, AND SHALL

MAKE ANY MINOR CHANGES IN LOCATION AS MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS. BACKFLOW PREVENTER HEIGHT SHALL BE AS PER LOCAL CODES AND IRRIGATION DETAILS. INSTALL A BRASS BALL VALVE IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF THE BACKFLOW DEVICE TO SERVE AS AN ISOLATION VALVE. TO EVERY EXTENT POSSIBLE, INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER ION A LOCATION SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW (SUCH AS BEHIND A SHRUB ROW).

K. PIPING:

1. PIPE SIZE SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF

SMALLER PIPE SIZES SHALL BE PERMITTED, BUT SUBSTITUTIONS FOR LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED.

2. MAINLINE PIPE AND WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 18 INCHES (24" FOR MAINLINE 3"-5", AND 30" FOR MAINLINE 6" AND GREATER). LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 12 INCHES.

3. ASSEMBLE ALL THREADED FITTINGS WITH TEFLON TAPE, WHICH SHALL BE APPLIED TO MALE THREADS ONLY.

4. ALL SOLVENT-WELD CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH APPROVED SOLVENT-WELD PRIMER AND GLUE.

5. PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FROM ANY OTHER PIPE AND 2" VERTICAL CLEARANCE FROM ANY PIPES THAT CROSS OVER OR UNDER.

L. VALVES

1. VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS AND THE IRRIGATION DETAILS.

2. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED FLUSH WITH THE GRADE, WITH CLEAN PEA GRAVEL LOCATED BELOW THE VALVE AS NOTED ON THE DETAILS. LOCATE BOXES WITHIN 12 TO 24" OF SIDEWALKS OR LANDSCAPE EDGES, WITH TOPS OF BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE IN TURF, AND 3" ABOVE FINISH GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS (TO AVOID BEING COVERED BY MULCH).

3. EACH VALVE BOX COVER SHALL BE HEAT-BRANDED WITH THE CONTROLLER STATION NUMBER.

4. DO NOT INSTALL MORE THAN TWO VALVES IN A JUMBO BOX.

M. DRIP IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS AND THE IRRIGATION DETAILS.

1. SUBSURFACE DRIP LINES SHALL BE BURIED NO MORE THAN 2" BELOW FINISH GRADE.

2. DRIP LINES MOUNTED ON GRADE SHALL BE LOCATED BENEATH LANDSCAPE FABRIC, AND SECURED IN PLACE WITH WIRE STAPLES AT A MAXIMUM OF 24"-36" ON CENTER.

N. SPRAY, ROTOR, AND BUBBLER HEADS:

1. ALL SPRAY AND ROTOR HEAD LOCATIONS SHALL BE STAKED, FLAGGED AND/OR OTHERWISE CLEARLY MARKED ON THE GROUND PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SPRINKLER HEAD STAKING

SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE INSTALLATION.

2. ALL SPRAY HEADS SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH A 12 INCH MINIMUM LENGTH OF 12 INCH FLEX PVC. THE FLEX PVC SHALL BE SOLVENT WELDED TO SCHEDULE 40 PVC FITTINGS WITH WELD-ON #795 SOLVENT AND #P-70 PRIMER. ALL ROTORS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO LATERAL LINES WITH PRE-MANUFACTURED SWING JOINTS.

3. ALL ROTOR, SPRAY AND BUBBLER HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR AND FLUSH TO

FINISH GRADE AND WITH A CLEARANCE OF FOUR INCHES (MINIMUM) FROM THE EDGE OF ANY

BUILDINGS, WALLS, BOULDERS, AND HARDSCAPE, WITH A CLEARANCE OF TWELVE INCHES (MINIMUM) FROM BUILDINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

4. ALL ROTOR, SPRRAY AND BUBBLER HEADS AND VALVES SHALL BE FLUSHED AND ADJUSTED FOR OPTIMUM COVERAGE WITH MINIMUM OVERSPRAY ON WALKS, STREETS, WALLS, ETC.

5. LATERAL PIPE TO TREE STREAM BUBBLER HEADS IS OMITTED FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY.

CONNECT TREE BUBBLER HEADS TO VALVES AS SHOWN WITH CLASS 200 PVC PIPE SIZED TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY OF 5 FEET PER SECOND
O. AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER:

1. INSTALL THE CONTROLLER AT THE LOCATION INDICATED BY THE OWNER. INSTALL CONTROLLER WITH A BACKUP BATTERY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.

2. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE 120 V.A.C. ELECTRICAL POWER TO CONTROLLER AND DEDICATE ONE (1) 20-AMP BREAKER FOR EACH CONTROLLER. IT SHALL BE

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO MAKE THE FINAL HOOK-UP FROM THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE TO THE CONTROLLER UNIT ONLY.

3. ALL VALVE CONTROL WIRE SHALL BE AWG 14 TYPE UF, 600 VOLT TEST, DIRECT BURIAL. NO SPLICES SHALL BE ALLOWED EXCEPT AT VALVES AND CONTROLLER. WHERE SPLICES MAY

BE NECESSARY DUE TO EXCESSIVELY LONG WIRE RUNS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALL SPLICES IN 6" ROUND VALVE BOXES WITH 3M'S "DBY-DIRECT BURIAL SPLICE KIT". THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL ALL WIRES WITH WATERPROOF TAGS AND MARKERS AT ALL SPLICES AND VALVE MANIFOLDS, AND SHALL LEAVE A 24" COIL OF EXCESS WIRE AT EACH CONNECTION.

4. PROVIDE #10 COMMON WIRE, DIRECT BURIAL, TO ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES.

5. CONNECT ALL DIRECT BURIAL WIRES TO VALVES USING 3M'S "DBY-DIRECT BURIAL SPLICE KIT" (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED).

6. PROVIDE THREE ADDITIONAL IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES ALONG EACH BRANCH OF MAINLINE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION. STUB ADDITIONAL CONTROL WIRES INTO BACK OF IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS.

7. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL CONTROL WIRE SLEEVES AND PIPE SLEEVES UNDER PAVED AREAS PRIOR TO PAVING - SEE SLEEVING NOTES.

P. INSTALL THE RAIN SENSOR IN THE VICINITY OF THE CONTROLLER, AND COORDINATE LOCATION WITH THE OWNER. PROVIDE MINIMUM 5' CLEARANCE FROM OTHER OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT, FREE

AND CLEAR OF ANY TREE CANOPY OR OTHER OVERHEAD OBSTRUCTIONS, AND ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE SPRINKLER COVERAGE. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO

ENSURE THE RAIN SENSOR IS PLACED IN A LOCATION WHERE IT CAN RECEIVE ADEQUATE RAINFALL WITHOUT OBSTRUCTIONS. IF IT IS PLACED IN AN INADEQUATE LOCATION, THE

IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO RELOCATE IT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

Q. THE PUMP SHALL NOT BE STARTED UNTIL A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PUMP MANUFACTURER INSPECTS THE INSTALLATION AND START-UP. ANY DAMAGE TO THE PUMP WITHOUT A WRITTEN

REPORT FROM THE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL, AT THE OWNER'S OPTION, BE IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN COST.

R. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

S. QUALITY CONTROL

1. PERFORM COVERAGE TESTS AFTER IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS COMPLETED, BUT PRIOR TO ANY

PLANTING AND PERFORM TESTING IN THE PRESENCE OF THE IRRIGATION DESIGNER AND THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.

2. TEST SYSTEM TO ASSURE THAT ALL LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS ARE WATERED COMPLETELY AND UNIFORMLY.

3. MAKE ALL NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE, INCLUDING REALIGNMENT OF HEADS AND REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES.

T. CLEAN UP

1. DURING IRRIGATION EXCAVATION AND INSTALLATION, KEEP ALL PAVEMENT CLEAN AND ALL WORK AREAS IN A NEAT, ORDERLY CONDITION.

2. DISPOSED LEGALLY OF ALL EXCAVATED MATERIALS OFF THE PROJECT SITE.

U. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

1. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE SITE CLEAN, FREE OF DEBRIS AND TRASH, AND SUITABLE FOR USE AS INTENDED. THE IRRIGATION

CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN REQUEST AN INSPECTION BY THE OWNER TO DETERMINE FINAL ACCEPTABILITY.

2. WHEN THE INSPECTED WORK DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE AND/OR REPAIR THE REJECTED WORK TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION WITHIN 24 HOURS.

3. THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD WILL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE WORK HAS BEEN RE-INSPECTED BY THE OWNER AND FOUND TO BE ACCEPTABLE. AT THAT TIME, A WRITTEN NOTICE OF FINAL

ACCEPTANCE WILL BE ISSUED BY THE OWNER, AND THE MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE PERIODS WILL COMMENCE.

4. CONTROLLER CHART: THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 11" X 17"

COLOR-CODED, LAMINATED COPY OF THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT AND PLACE IT IN THE CONTROLLER'S COVER. THE CONTROLLER CHART SHALL CLEARLY DELINEATE THE AREAS COVERED BY EACH VALVE, USING A SEPARATE COLOR FOR EACH ZONE.

5. TURN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IN TO THE OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION:
a. QUICK COUPLER KEYS (2)
b. CONTROLLER MANUAL (1)
c. CONTROLLER KEYS (2)
d. A MINIMUM OF (2) COPIES OF RECORD DRAWINGS. A RECORD DRAWING IS A RECORD

OF ALL CHANGES THAT OCCURRED IN THE FIELD AND THAT ARE DOCUMENTED

THROUGH CHANGE ORDERS, ADDENDA, OR CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT DRAWING MARKUPS.

V. REFER TO THE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND START OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD.

W. WARRANTY

1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE WARRANTED (LABOR AND MATERIALS) TO REMAIN OPERATIONAL FOR A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. DURING THIS PERIOD, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO REPAIR ANY SETTLEMENT OF THE IRRIGATION TRENCHES.

2. BY THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ANY IRRIGATION PART THAT IS EITHER

NON-OPERATIONAL OR THAT IS OPERATING BELOW STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND SHALL BE REPLACED. REPLACEMENTS

SHALL BE OF THE SAME KIND AS SPECIFIED IN THE IRRIGATION LEGEND, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AS ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED.

3. IRRIGATION PARTS DAMAGED OR IMPAIRED DUE TO ACTS OF GOD, VANDALISM, AND/OR THE OWNER'S IMPROPER MAINTENANCE SHALL NOT BE COVERED BY THIS WARRANTY.

X. SHOULD THE PERMITTING JURISDICTION REQUIRE AN IRRIGATION AUDIT, THE IRRIGATION

CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A THIRD-PARTY CERTIFIED LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDITOR, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
25 PSI

51.1 PSI

3.0 PSI

1. LOSS AT 1" SERVICE LINE: 22 / 100'

2. LOSS AT 1" WATER STUB OUT FOR 10.8 GPM:

3. LOSS AT 3/4" BACKFLOW PREVENTOR

4. LOSS AT 1" MAINLINE

TOTAL PRESSURE LOSS

6. LOSS AT SECTION LATERAL PVC PIPE

8. LOSS AT SPRAY HEAD NOZZLE

5. LOSS AT 1" ELECTRIC VALVE

7. LOSS AT MASTER VALVE

2.0 PSI

1.9 PSI

11.0 PSI

2.7 PSI

2.0 PSI

3.5 PSI

CRITICAL ANALYSIS
#"
#
Valve Number
Valve Size
Valve Flow
Valve Callout
#

VALVE KEY
1 2
4 ZONE
#

PSI LOSS AT

WATER METER

PSI LOSS PSI LOSS AT PSI LOSS AT

ZONE VALVE

PSI LOSS AT

LATERAL PIPE

PSI LOSS AT TOTAL PSI

REQUIRED

3.5 ZONE
TYPE
ZONE
GPM
3 10.8

AT BACKFLOW MAINLINE HEAD / NOZZLE

RESIDUAL
PSI
3 4

3.5 BUBBLER 11.0 2.0

3.0 3.0

2.0 0.3

0.5 0.5

1.9 PSI LOSS AT

MASTER VALVE

3.0 3.0

11.0 11.0

11.0 3.5

3.5 3.5

25.0 30.0

30.0 25.0
DRIP
DRIP
SPRAY

0.20 0.35

0.35 3.14

45.0 51.35

51.35 49.54

20.0 13.65

13.65 15.46

ZONE PRESSURE LOSS CHART
5 7 10.8
6 3.5

3.5 3.0

3.0 2.0

0.5 0.5

1.9 3.0

3.0 3.0

11.0 11.0

11.0 3.5

3.5 3.5

30.0 30.0

25.0 DRIP
DRIP
SPRAY

0.35 0.35

3.14 51.35

51.35 49.54

13.65 13.65

15.46 8 4 DRIP 0.5 11.0 3.0 0.35 3.0 3.5 30.0 51.35 13.65 9 11 1
10 2
3 2.0

3.0 2.0

0.2 0.3

0.1 3.0

3.0 3.0

11.0 11.0

11.0 3.5

3.5 3.5

25.0 30.0

25.0 BUBBLER
DRIP

BUBBLER

0.10 0.20

0.03 45.0

51.0 44.63

20.0 14.0

20.37 12 2 DRIP 0.2 11.0 3.0 0.10 3.0 3.5 30.0 50.80 14.20 ON SITE STATIC PRESSURE IS 35 PSI
BOOSTER PUMP TO SUPPLY 20 PSI BOOST
RAINBIRD PEB SERIES ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL, "TREE BUBBLER ZONE" VALVE SEE INSTALLATION NOTE #N-5 REGARDING TREE BUBBLER LATERAL PIPE

FLOW RANGE: 15-62GPM.

XCZ-150-PRB-LCDR - 1-1/2" PESB-R SCRUBBER GLOBE VALVE WITH SINGLE 1-1/2" PRESSURE REGULATING (40PSI) QUICK-CHECK BASKET FILTERS. *** ALL PIPE TO BE SIZED SUCH THAT FLOWS WILL NOT EXCEED VELOCITY OF 5 FPS ***

RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-PRS SERIES POP UP SPRAY HEADS WITH ADAPTER AND RAINBIRD #1402 SERIES BUBBLER NOZZLES@ 25psi. ( TWO PER TREE ) SEE INSTALLATION NOTE #N-5 REGARDING TREE BUBBLER LATERAL PIPE RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-PRS SERIES 12H POP UP SPRAY HEAD WITH U-SERIES NOZZLE AT 25 PSI.

Rain Bird D Series "VERTICAL PUMP STATION" 3hp Providing 15 gpm @ 20psi boost. BP BOOST ON DISCHARGE SIDE OF PUMP SHALL BE 55 PSI MINIMUM.

IRRIGATION_LEGEND
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 699 of 1447 ends

Pump Tech Spec
Rain Bird’s single pump, Vertical Multi-Stage
station in a powder-coated green enclosure is
designed for small to midsize boost, flooded
suction and suction lift applications such
as city parks and buildings, sports fields,
commercial buildings, small home owner’s associations and large residential sites. Its small footprint, durable multistage pump configuration, and choice of options make it an ideal choice for Turf irrigation applications with
flows up to 200 gpm (12.6 lps, 45.4 m3
/h).

At-A-Glance Description
• Reliability – Integrated Plug-n-Pump
provide single source responsibility for the
entire pumping system insuring trouble-free
installation and operation.
• Energy efficient – Variable Frequency Drive
(VFD) maintains constant pressure at varying
flow demand.
• Inlet and discharge isolation valves for
easier mechanical serviceability.
• Easy Start-up – All stations are water-tested
at the factory prior to shipment.

Standard Features
• Plumbing Configurations
- Inlet and Discharge Piping on the same
side of the enclosure (as shown)
• Mechanical Features
- Inlet Butterfly Isolation Valve
- Discharge Butterfly Isolation Valve
- Silent Check Valve
• Pressure / Flow
- Stainless Steel Pressure Transducer
- Flow Switch
• Enclosures / External Connections
- Polyester Powder Coated Steel Enclosure
- Polyester Powder-Coated Steel Deck and
Piping
- Re-Prime Piping (Suction Lift only)
- Thermostat and Fan on Mechanical
Enclosure
• Pump Control
- Pump Start Relay
- VFD - Variable Frequency Drive for
Control of Pressure
• Display
- Monochrome Touch Screen Display
Optional Features
• Plumbing Configurations
- Inlet and Discharge Piping through the
deck (bottom)
- Mechanical Feature
- Pressure Relief Valve
• Pressure / Flow
- Paddle Wheel Flow Meter
• Enclosures
- Environmental Package: includes heater
and insulation/sound dampening
Accessories
• Discharge Filter
- Wye Strainer (1/8” openings)
• Intake Filters
- HDPE Suction Intake Piping
- Foot Valve
- Intake Screen
• External Connections
- Bladder Tank
- Zee Pipe
• Lake Level Control
- Lake Level Shut Off (Float)
Vertical Multistage – 1 Pump – D Series
Low to Medium Flow Pump Station
3 to 15 HP; Up to 115 psi (7.9 bar); Up to 200 gpm (12.6 lps, 45.4 m3/h) (1) Refer to pump performance curves, provided upon request from [email protected] Vertical Multistage – 1 Pump – Green Enclosure
Motor Size 3 HP 5 HP 7 ½ HP 10 HP 15 HP
Pump Type Vertical Multi-Stage
Power Requirement
480/60/3 V/HZ/PH
208-230/60/3 V/HZ/PH
208-230/60/1 V/HZ/PH
Inlet Pressure Requirement Suction Lift or Boost Applications Outlet Pressure Up to 115 psi (7.9 bar) (1)
Outlet Flow Up to 200 gpm (12.6 lps, 45.4 m3/h) (1)
Concrete Slab Dimensions (min) 90" x 48" (229 cm x 122 cm) Platform Skid Dimensions (min) 78" x 36" (198 cm x 91 cm) Inlet / Discharge Size 4" Standard - 2", 3", and 6" adapters available Cabinet Height (from slab) 52" (132 cm)
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 700 of 1447 ends

p/n SMEFPTSVMS1GR Rev A
Rain Bird Corporation - Pumps Division
6991 E. Southpoint Road
Tucson, AZ 85756
Applications Group: (520) 806-5620
Fax: (520) 741-6191
E-mail: [email protected]
The Intelligent Use of Water™
www.rainbird.com
® Registered Trademark of Rain Bird Corporation
© 2013 Rain Bird Corporation 6/13
Details
Plan View Profile View
Side View
ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 701 of 1447 ends

ITEM 10.6. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 702 of 1447 ends

DOUGLAS ROAD
SUNRISE BOULEVARD VAN S-2 9,000 SF S-1B 4,050 SF
VAN

MENU SIDE
BACK
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 3,200 SF
VAN LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SCF 1" = 20'0" LP-1.1 14 Know what's below Call before you dig. CLIENT: PROJECT: ISSUE DATE DRAWN : CHECKED : SCALE: : SHEET TITLE: SHEET OF SHEETS 12345 JOB NO. : SCF FUHRMAN LEAMY LAND GROUP D3h5GN ¥ h3Rg5B3 ¥ hOLUD5ONh 2140 PROFESSIONAL DRIVE, SUITE 115 ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661 916.783.5263 ȏ fllandgroup.com REVISIONS DATE 678910 RSC.17034 ANATOLIA RETAIL PHASE 1 RSC ENGINEERING ROSEVILLE, CA SUNRISE BLVD. RANCHO CORDOVA,CA 16 1ST PC SUBMITTAL 11/13/17 2ND PC SUBMITTAL 3/12/18 3RD SUBMITTTAL 5/2/18 4TH SUBMITTAL 5/17/18 5TH SUBMITTAL 6/14/18 7TH SUBMITTAL 6/05/20 6TH SUBMITTAL 4/15/20 8.21.2020 8TH SUBMITTAL 8/21/20 PLANT MATERIAL LIST AND LEGEND TREES SHRUBS GROUNDCOVERS MATCHLINE - SEE LP-1.2 LIMIT OF WORK - PHASE 1 MATCHLINE - SEE LP-1.0 S-1A PAD
ITEM 10.6.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 703 of 1447 ends

Rancho Cordova City CouncilMarch 21, 2022

Rancho Cordova City Council
March 21, 2022