Agenda packet — Rancho Cordova City Council, March 21, 2022 (part 9 of 10)

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21
Future Volume (veh/h) 21
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 31
Arrive On Green 0.52
Sat Flow, veh/h 59
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 665
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1860
Q Serve(g_s), s 20.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.7
Prop In Lane 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 970
V/C Ratio(X) 0.69
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1273
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 12.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.9
LnGrp LOS B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1161 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 627 19 13 899 0 68 0 23 1 0 4
Future Volume (veh/h) 3 627 19 13 899 0 68 0 23 1 0 4
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1811 1870 1870 1811 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 627 19 13 899 0 68 0 23 1 0 4
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 262262222222
Cap, veh/h 4 2111 64 17 2156 0 236 0 118 90 11 95
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.63 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3410 103 1781 3532 0 1401 0 1572 164 150 1259 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 316 330 13 899 0 68 0 23 5 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1721 1792 1781 1721 0 1401 0 1572 1573 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 4.8 4.8 0.4 7.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 4.8 4.8 0.4 7.4 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.80
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 4 1065 1110 17 2156 0 236 0 118 196 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.30 0.30 0.74 0.42 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.19 0.03 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 208 1928 2009 240 3918 0 972 0 945 1000 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.8 5.0 5.0 27.5 5.3 0.0 25.0 0.0 24.2 23.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 110.7 0.2 0.1 46.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.3 1.7 1.8 0.7 2.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 138.5 5.1 5.1 73.7 5.4 0.0 25.7 0.0 25.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F AAEAACACCAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 649 912 91 5
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.7 6.4 25.5 24.0
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 6.0 40.0 9.7 5.6 40.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.5 7.5 62.5 33.5 6.5 63.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 2.4 6.8 2.2 2.1 9.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 15.9 0.0 0.0 25.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.2
HCM 6th LOS A
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1162 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 511 112 18 586 30 1 204 43 30 20 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 511 112 18 586 30 1 204 43 30 20 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1811 1870 1870 1811 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 511 112 18 586 30 204 43 30 20 51 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 262262 22222
Cap, veh/h 6 1185 544 23 1180 60 288 166 116 146 76
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3441 1580 1781 3330 170 1781 1024 714 1781 934 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 511 112 18 302 314 204 0 73 20 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1721 1580 1781 1721 1780 1781 0 1739 1781 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 6.3 2.8 0.6 7.6 7.6 6.0 0.0 2.0 0.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 6.3 2.8 0.6 7.6 7.6 6.0 0.0 2.0 0.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.41 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 6 1185 544 23 609 630 288 0 281 146 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.43 0.21 0.77 0.50 0.50 0.71 0.00 0.26 0.14 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 242 1904 874 275 983 1017 1179 0 1151 727 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.5 13.9 12.8 27.1 13.9 14.0 21.9 0.0 20.2 23.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 92.0 0.2 0.2 40.3 0.6 0.6 3.2 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.3 3.6 1.5 0.8 4.4 4.5 4.5 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 119.4 14.2 12.9 67.4 14.6 14.6 25.1 0.0 20.7 23.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS F BBEBB CACCA
Approach Vol, veh/h 627 634 277 114
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.6 16.1 23.9 28.9
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.4 6.2 24.5 10.0 5.7 25.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.5 8.5 30.5 22.5 7.5 31.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.0 2.6 8.3 4.9 2.1 9.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.0 8.8 0.3 0.0 9.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1163 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 43
Future Volume (veh/h) 43
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 64
Arrive On Green 0.08
Sat Flow, veh/h 788
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 94
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1722
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9
Prop In Lane 0.46
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 141
V/C Ratio(X) 0.67
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 703
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.9
LnGrp LOS C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1164 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
7: Gold Drdege Way & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 181 10 55 83 10 128
Future Vol, veh/h 181 10 55 83 10 128
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 20220
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 181 10 55 83 10 128
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 249 101 0 0 140 0
Stage 1 99 -----
Stage 2 150 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 739 954 - - 1443 -
Stage 1 925 -----
Stage 2 878 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 731 950 - - 1440 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 731 -----
Stage 1 923 -----
Stage 2 870 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 11.5 0 0.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 740 1440 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.258 0.007 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11.5 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0 -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1165 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
8: Luyung Dr & Gold Drdege Way 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 61 23 5 172 9 15 67 2 4 58 8
Future Vol, veh/h 14 61 23 5 172 9 15 67 2 4 58 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 14 61 23 5 172 9 15 67 2 4 58 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 263 173 66 214 176 72 68 0 0 71 0 0 Stage 1 72 72 - 100 100 -------
Stage 2 191 101 - 114 76 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 690 720 998 743 717 990 1533 - - 1529 - - Stage 1 938 835 - 906 812 -------
Stage 2 811 811 - 891 832 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 548 708 994 669 705 986 1530 - - 1526 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 548 708 - 669 705 -------
Stage 1 927 831 - 895 802 -------
Stage 2 624 801 - 803 828 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.7 11.8 1.3 0.4

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1530 - - 727 714 1526 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.135 0.261 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 10.7 11.8 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - BBAA -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 1 0 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1166 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 9: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & White Rock Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 211 137 16 137 270 44
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 211 137 16 137 270 44
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1870 1870 1811 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 211 137 16 137 270 44
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 622622
Cap, veh/h 963 442 43 1627 574 283
Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.47 0.17 0.17
Sat Flow, veh/h 3532 1579 3456 3532 3456 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 211 137 16 137 270 44
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1579 1728 1721 1728 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 2.1 0.1 0.7 2.2 0.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 2.1 0.1 0.7 2.2 0.7
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 963 442 43 1627 574 283
V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.31 0.37 0.08 0.47 0.16
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 5929 2721 2438 7793 3346 1554
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.4 8.7 14.9 4.4 11.5 10.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.4 5.2 0.0 0.6 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.5 9.0 20.2 4.4 12.1 10.8
LnGrp LOS A A C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 348 153 314
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.7 6.1 11.9
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.6 5.9 14.0 19.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 21.5 52.5 69.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 2.1 4.1 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 0.0 4.4 2.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1167 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 0 7 35 28 54 36
Future Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 0 7 35 28 54 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 022022022202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - - None
Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - 150 - - - 200 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 0 7 35 28 54 36
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 256 263 49 215 278 8 92 007900
Stage 1 200 200 - 60 60 --------
Stage 2 56 63 - 155 218 --------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 --------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 --------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 676 641 1009 723 629 1072 1501 - - 1414 1609 - - Stage 1 783 735 - 944 844 --------
Stage 2 949 842 - 832 721 --------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 634 600 1005 677 589 1068 1498 - - 1482 1482 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 634 600 - 677 589 --------
Stage 1 767 702 - 925 827 --------
Stage 2 918 825 - 782 689 --------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.8 8.8 5.9 3.1

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1498 - - 634 1005 677 1068 1482 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - 0.446 0.016 0.006 0.013 0.043 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 15.2 8.6 10.3 8.4 7.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C ABAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 2.3 0 0 0 0.1 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1168 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.8
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 0 7 35 28 54
Future Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 0 7 35 28 54
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 0 7 35 28 54
Number of Lanes 110110110011
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2222
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2222
HCM Control Delay 12.2 7.7 8.8 9

HCM LOS BAAA

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 60%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 27 7 283 16 4 14 63 90
LT Vol 27 0 283 0 4 0 63 0
Through Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
RT Vol 0 7 0 16 0 14 0 36
Lane Flow Rate 27 7 283 16 4 14 63 90
Geometry Grp 77777777
Degree of Util (X) 0.046 0.01 0.436 0.019 0.007 0.018 0.104 0.129 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.102 4.893 5.552 4.348 5.854 4.645 5.958 5.173 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 586 729 648 822 610 767 602 692
Service Time 3.851 2.641 3.287 2.083 3.605 2.396 3.695 2.91 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.01 0.437 0.019 0.007 0.018 0.105 0.13 HCM Control Delay 9.1 7.7 12.5 7.2 8.6 7.5 9.4 8.7
HCM Lane LOS AABAAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0 2.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.3 0.4
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1169 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 36
Future Vol, veh/h 36
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 2
Mvmt Flow 36
Number of Lanes 0
Approach
Opposing Approach
Opposing Lanes
Conflicting Approach Left
Conflicting Lanes Left
Conflicting Approach Right
Conflicting Lanes Right
HCM Control Delay

HCM LOS

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1170 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
11: Gold Dredege Way & Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 141
Future Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 141
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 0 150 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 34 0 0 0 0 141
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 75 75 143 0 - 0
Stage 1 73 -----
Stage 2 2 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 920 971 1437 - - -
Stage 1 941 -----
Stage 2 1020 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 916 967 1434 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 916 -----
Stage 1 939 -----
Stage 2 1018 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1434 - 916 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.037 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 9.1 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1171 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
11: Gold Dredege Way & Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 141
Future Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 141
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 222222
Mvmt Flow 34 0 0 0 0 141
Number of Lanes 111111
Approach EB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 0
Conflicting Approach Right NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 0 2
HCM Control Delay 8.3 0 7.3

HCM LOS A - A

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 0 34 0 0 141
LT Vol 0 0 34 0 0 0
Through Vol 000000
RT Vol 0 0 0 0 0 141
Lane Flow Rate 0 0 34 0 0 141
Geometry Grp 777777
Degree of Util (X) 0 0 0.05 0 0 0.152
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.664 4.664 5.282 4.781 4.593 3.893 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 0 675 0 0 918
Service Time 2.421 2.421 3.036 2.534 2.333 1.632
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 0.05 0 0 0.154
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.4 8.3 7.5 7.3 7.3
HCM Lane LOS N N A N N A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.5
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1172 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
12: Driveway 1/Sarapiqui Way & International Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 36 27 0 141 16 0
Future Vol, veh/h 36 27 0 141 16 0
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 022022
Mvmt Flow 36 27 0 141 16 0
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7 7.5

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 57% 100%
Vol Thru, % 0% 0% 0%
Vol Right, % 100% 43% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 141 63 16
LT Vol 0 36 16
Through Vol 0 0 0
RT Vol 141 27 0
Lane Flow Rate 141 63 16
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.134 0.07 0.019
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.422 4.027 4.352
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 1045 889 821
Service Time 1.454 2.054 2.388
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.071 0.019
HCM Control Delay 7 7.4 7.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.2 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1173 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
13: Driveway 2 & International Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 157 0 0 63 0 141
Future Vol, veh/h 157 0 0 63 0 141
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22022
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22220
Mvmt Flow 157 0 0 63 0 141
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 161
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 889
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 886
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.8

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 886 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1174 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
14: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 3 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 34 47 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 34 47 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 61 0 34 47 27
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 41 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1028 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 1024 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1024 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.06 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1175 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
15: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 4 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 34 81 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 34 81 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 61 0 34 81 27
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 58 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1002 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 998 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 998 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.061 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1176 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
16: Industrial Driveway/Driveway 5 & Gold Dredege Way 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 34 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Future Vol, veh/h 0 34 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222220
Mvmt Flow 0 34 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 38 - - 143
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - ------- 6.22 - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----------
Follow-up Hdwy - ------- 3.318 - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 1034 0 0 910
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - ------- 1030 - - 908
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 9.1

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - - - 908
HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---- 0.023
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 9.1
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - - 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1177 of 1447 ends

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Project Sunrise (Revised) 17: Gold Dredge Way & Driveway 6 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 27 34 162 0 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 27 34 162 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 34 162 0 0 0
Pedestrians 2 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 164 254 166
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 164 254 166
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1427 719 877
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 61 162
Volume Left 27 0
Volume Right 0 0
cSH 1427 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0
Control Delay (s) 3.4 0.0
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 3.4 0.0
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1178 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
18: Mechanical Dr & Luyung Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour
2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 0 0 0 0 64
Future Vol, veh/h 10 0 0 0 0 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 10 0 0 0 0 64
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1 0 - 0 21 1
Stage 1 - - - - 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - 20 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - 996 1084
Stage 1 - - - - 1022 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1003 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - 990 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 990 -
Stage 1 - - - - 1016 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1003 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 7.2 0 8.5

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1622 - - - 1084
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.059
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.2 - - - 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1179 of 1447 ends

Build+ (2023)
(2023 With Project + Potential Industrial Park)
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1180 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 61 145 384 135 172 244 355 50 193 1246 146 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 61 145 384 135 172 244 355 50 193 1246 146 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1648 1796 1796 1648 1796 1796 1841 1796 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 145 384 135 172 244 355 193 1246 146 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 17 7 7 17 7 7 4 7
Cap, veh/h 208 700 339 236 1043 352 261 1653 500
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 3319 3131 1518 3319 4499 1518 3319 5025 1519 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 145 384 135 172 244 355 193 1246 146 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1659 1566 1518 1659 1500 1518 1659 1675 1519 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 11.3 7.9 5.3 4.6 24.2 5.9 23.1 7.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 11.3 7.9 5.3 4.6 24.2 5.9 23.1 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 208 700 339 236 1043 352 261 1653 500 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.55 0.40 0.73 0.23 1.01 0.74 0.75 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 334 735 356 324 1043 352 410 1709 517 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.9 35.9 34.5 47.5 32.5 40.1 47.0 31.2 26.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.2 0.8 0.8 5.2 0.1 50.1 4.1 1.9 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.4 7.6 5.2 4.1 2.9 19.6 4.5 14.0 4.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.1 36.6 35.3 52.7 32.7 90.1 51.1 33.1 26.3 LnGrp LOS DDDDCF DCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 664 771 1585
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.7 63.6 34.7
Approach LOS D E C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 40.3 12.9 29.1 13.7 48.6 12.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 6 5.5 * 5.8 5.5 6.0 5.5 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 * 36 10.2 * 25 12.9 39.6 10.5 24.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.2 25.1 7.3 13.3 7.9 20.3 6.5 26.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 9.2 0.2 4.4 0.3 15.5 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.3
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1181 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 461 1150 145
Future Volume (veh/h) 461 1150 145
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1796
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 461 1150 145
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 7
Cap, veh/h 524 2051 620
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.41 0.41
Sat Flow, veh/h 3319 5025 1520
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 461 1150 145
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1659 1675 1520
Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 18.3 6.5
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 18.3 6.5
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 524 2051 620
V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.56 0.23
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 557 2051 620
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.0 23.7 20.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.4 0.3 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 10.8 11.1 4.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.4 24.0 20.4
LnGrp LOS E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1756
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.5
Approach LOS C
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1182 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 179 52 269 7 16 88 6 226 1463 15 85 1039 Future Volume (veh/h) 179 52 269 7 16 88 6 226 1463 15 85 1039 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1870 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 179 52 269 7 16 88 226 1463 15 85 1039 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222 24224
Cap, veh/h 301 353 525 10 25 139 274 2274 23 109 2080
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1870 2781 1781 248 1366 3456 5129 53 1781 5025 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 179 52 269 7 0 104 226 956 522 85 1039 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1870 1390 1781 0 1615 1728 1675 1831 1781 1675 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 1.6 6.0 0.3 0.0 4.3 4.5 15.4 15.4 3.3 10.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 1.6 6.0 0.3 0.0 4.3 4.5 15.4 15.4 3.3 10.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.03 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 301 353 525 10 0 164 274 1485 812 109 2080 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.15 0.51 0.72 0.00 0.64 0.83 0.64 0.64 0.78 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1020 1263 1878 113 0 684 274 1549 847 172 2367 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.5 23.5 25.3 34.5 0.0 30.0 31.5 15.1 15.1 32.1 15.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.2 0.8 67.2 0.0 4.0 18.3 0.9 1.6 11.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.5 1.2 3.5 0.5 0.0 3.2 4.3 8.6 9.5 2.9 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.4 23.7 26.1 101.6 0.0 34.0 49.8 15.9 16.6 43.3 15.2 LnGrp LOS C C C F A C D B B D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 500 111 1704 1389
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 38.3 20.6 16.8
Approach LOS C D C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 36.3 5.5 18.7 11.0 34.2 11.5 12.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.7 5.5 * 5.1 * 5.6 5.5 * 5.5 5.5 5.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 6.7 32.1 * 4.4 * 47 5.5 * 33 20.5 29.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 17.4 2.3 8.0 6.5 12.6 5.5 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 15.3 0.6 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1183 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 265
Future Volume (veh/h) 265
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 265
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 655
Arrive On Green 0.41
Sat Flow, veh/h 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 265
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.2
Prop In Lane 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 655
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 745
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.7
LnGrp LOS B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1184 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 34 3 1 56 4 102 3 7 1589 110 207 887 Future Volume (veh/h) 34 3 1 56 4 102 3 7 1589 110 207 887 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1870 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 36 0 1 59 0 102 7 1589 110 207 887 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222 24224
Cap, veh/h 92 0 40 333 0 147 10 2258 156 249 2939
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.01 0.47 0.47 0.14 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 0 1561 3563 0 1575 1781 4798 332 1781 4867 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 36 0 1 59 0 102 7 1109 590 207 610 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1561 1781 0 1575 1781 1675 1780 1781 1675 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 4.8 0.3 20.2 20.2 8.7 6.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 4.8 0.3 20.2 20.2 8.7 6.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 92 0 40 333 0 147 10 1576 838 249 2023 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.69 0.73 0.70 0.70 0.83 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 949 0 416 833 0 368 109 1610 856 317 2023 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.9 0.0 36.5 32.2 0.0 33.8 38.2 16.1 16.1 32.2 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 5.7 68.5 1.4 2.6 13.7 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.6 0.6 11.0 11.9 7.9 3.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.6 0.0 36.8 32.4 0.0 39.6 106.7 17.5 18.7 45.9 7.5 LnGrp LOS D A D C A D F B B D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 37 161 1706 1144
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.5 36.9 18.3 14.4
Approach LOS D D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.5 41.3 7.5 5.2 51.6 12.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.7 5.1 5.5 * 4.8 5.1 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 14 37.0 20.5 * 4.7 45.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 22.2 2.8 2.3 8.8 6.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 14.0 0.1 0.0 20.7 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1185 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50
Future Volume (veh/h) 50
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 50
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 165
Arrive On Green 0.60
Sat Flow, veh/h 274
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 327
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1791
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.8
Prop In Lane 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1081
V/C Ratio(X) 0.30
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1081
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.6
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1186 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 1 0 24 0 7 1 13 1715 73 22 7
Future Volume (veh/h) 46 1 0 24 0 7 1 13 1715 73 22 7
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 46 1 0 24 0 7 13 1715 73 7
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222 222 2
Cap, veh/h 82 2 74 61 0 54 29 2911 124 16
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.01 Sat Flow, veh/h 1745 38 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5022 214 1781 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 0 24 0 7 13 1162 626 7
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1783 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1832 1781 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 11.9 11.9 0.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 11.9 11.9 0.2 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 83 0 74 61 0 54 29 1973 1062 16
V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.13 0.45 0.59 0.59 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 625 0 555 624 0 555 180 2966 1596 206 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 0.0 25.8 0.0 25.5 26.6 7.3 7.3 26.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.1 10.3 0.3 0.5 16.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 5.7 6.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.3 0.0 0.0 29.8 0.0 26.6 36.8 7.6 7.8 43.4 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C D A A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 47 31 1801
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.3 29.1 7.9
Approach LOS C C A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.0 36.1 7.0 5.4 35.7 6.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.3 47.5 19.1 5.5 48.3 19.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 13.9 3.4 2.4 7.3 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 17.7 0.1 0.0 7.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.0
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1187 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 889 71
Future Volume (veh/h) 889 71
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 889 71
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2760 220
Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57
Sat Flow, veh/h 4821 384
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 627 333
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1702 1801
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 5.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 5.3
Prop In Lane 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1948 1031
V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.32
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3016 1596
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 6.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.5 2.7
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.2 6.3
LnGrp LOS A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 967
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5
Approach LOS A
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1188 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 761 29 4 582 1 13 0 18 0 0 1
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 761 29 4 582 1 13 0 18 0 0 1
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1648 1870 1870 1648 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 761 29 4 582 1 13 0 18 0 0 1
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 17 2 2 17 2222222
Cap, veh/h 4 1881 72 6 2350 4 197 0 49 0 0 49
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3075 117 1781 3207 6 1389 0 1570 0 0 1570 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 387 403 4 284 299 13 0 18 0 0 1
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1566 1627 1781 1566 1647 1389 0 1570 0 0 1570 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 6.0 6.0 0.1 2.8 2.8 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 6.0 6.0 0.1 2.8 2.8 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 4 958 995 6 1147 1207 197 0 49 0 0 49 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.69 0.25 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 157 2031 2110 248 2112 2222 943 0 892 0 0 892 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 4.7 4.7 23.2 2.0 2.0 22.1 0.0 22.1 0.0 0.0 21.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.3 90.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 4.9 4.9 114.2 2.1 2.1 22.3 0.0 26.6 0.0 0.0 22.1 LnGrp LOS A A A F A A C A C A A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 790 587 31 1
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.9 2.9 24.8 22.1
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.0 5.7 34.0 7.0 0.0 39.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 6.5 60.5 26.5 4.1 62.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 2.1 8.0 2.0 0.0 4.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 14.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.5
HCM 6th LOS A
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1189 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 81 390 224 19 360 31 147 70 21 15 15 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 81 390 224 19 360 31 147 70 21 15 15 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1648 1870 1870 1648 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 81 390 224 19 360 31 147 70 21 15 15 24 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 17 2 2 17 2222222
Cap, veh/h 105 997 503 25 799 68 242 187 56 69 25 40
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.04 0.04 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3131 1580 1781 2918 250 1781 1380 414 1781 644 1030 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 81 390 224 19 192 199 147 0 91 15 0 39 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1566 1580 1781 1566 1602 1781 0 1794 1781 0 1674 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 4.3 5.0 0.5 4.5 4.6 3.5 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.0 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 4.3 5.0 0.5 4.5 4.6 3.5 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.0 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.62
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 105 997 503 25 429 438 242 0 243 69 0 65 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.39 0.45 0.76 0.45 0.45 0.61 0.00 0.37 0.22 0.00 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 579 2071 1045 299 790 808 1258 0 1266 779 0 732 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.7 11.8 12.1 21.9 13.4 13.4 18.2 0.0 17.6 20.8 0.0 21.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.4 0.3 0.6 36.1 0.7 0.7 2.5 0.0 1.0 1.6 0.0 8.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.8 2.0 2.5 0.8 2.3 2.4 2.5 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.1 12.1 12.7 58.0 14.1 14.2 20.6 0.0 18.5 22.3 0.0 29.7 LnGrp LOS C BBEBBCABCAC
Approach Vol, veh/h 695 410 238 54
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.6 16.2 19.8 27.7
Approach LOS B B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.6 6.1 19.7 7.2 8.1 17.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 7.5 29.5 19.5 14.5 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 2.5 7.0 3.0 4.0 6.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.0 7.1 0.1 0.1 5.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.5
HCM 6th LOS B
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1190 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
7: Gold Drdege Way & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 117 35 109 219 76 22
Future Vol, veh/h 117 35 109 219 76 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 20220
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 117 35 109 219 76 22
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 397 223 0 0 330 0
Stage 1 221 -----
Stage 2 176 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 608 817 - - 1229 -
Stage 1 816 -----
Stage 2 855 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 567 814 - - 1227 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 567 -----
Stage 1 814 -----
Stage 2 799 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 0 6.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 610 1227 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.249 0.062 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.8 8.1 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1191 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
8: Luyung Dr & Gold Drdege Way 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 251 38 3 126 0 15 32 7 10 46 28
Future Vol, veh/h 13 251 38 3 126 0 15 32 7 10 46 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 13 251 38 3 126 0 15 32 7 10 46 28
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 213 153 64 295 164 40 76 0 0 41 0 0 Stage 1 82 82 - 68 68 -------
Stage 2 131 71 - 227 96 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 744 739 1000 657 729 1031 1523 - - 1568 - - Stage 1 926 827 - 942 838 -------
Stage 2 873 836 - 776 815 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 632 723 996 454 714 1027 1520 - - 1565 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 632 723 - 454 714 -------
Stage 1 915 820 - 931 828 -------
Stage 2 731 826 - 513 808 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13.1 11.2 2.1 0.9

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1520 - - 744 705 1565 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.406 0.183 0.006 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 13.1 11.2 7.3 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - BBAA -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2 0.7 0 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1192 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 9: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 133 105 32 161 27 8
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 133 105 32 161 27 8
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1648 1870 1870 1648 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 133 105 32 161 27 8
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 17 2 2 17 2 2
Cap, veh/h 768 387 83 1579 90 80
Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.50 0.03 0.03
Sat Flow, veh/h 3214 1579 3456 3214 3456 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 105 32 161 27 8
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1566 1579 1728 1566 1728 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 768 387 83 1579 90 80
V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.27 0.38 0.10 0.30 0.10
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 8490 4280 738 8490 3689 1730
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.0 7.1 11.3 3.0 11.2 10.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.4 2.9 0.0 1.8 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.1 7.5 14.1 3.1 13.0 11.2
LnGrp LOS AABABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 238 193 35
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.3 4.9 12.6
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.1 11.2 17.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 5.0 63.5 63.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 2.2 3.3 2.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.8 3.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.7
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1193 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 0 24 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 107 30
Future Vol, veh/h 24 0 24 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 107 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202 202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - 150 - - 200 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222 222
Mvmt Flow 24 0 24 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 107 30
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 148 153 73 85 168 10 139 0 0 13 0 0 Stage 1 124 124 - 29 29 ---- ---
Stage 2 24 29 - 56 139 ---- ---
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ---- ---
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 ---- ---
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 806 738 974 892 724 1069 1442 - - 1604 - - Stage 1 867 792 - 984 870 ---- ---
Stage 2 991 870 - 949 781 ---- ---
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 800 731 970 863 717 1065 1439 - - 1601 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 800 731 - 863 717 ---- ---
Stage 1 861 790 - 977 863 ---- ---
Stage 2 984 863 - 924 779 ---- ---
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 0 3.2 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1439 - - 800 970 - - 1601 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.03 0.025 -----
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 9.6 8.8 0 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - AAAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1194 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 0 24 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 107
Future Vol, veh/h 24 0 24 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 107
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 24 0 24 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 107
Number of Lanes 110110110011
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 7.7 0 7.7 8.1

HCM LOS A - A A

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 78%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 22%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 8 11 24 24 0 0 0 137
LT Vol 8 0 24 0 0 0 0 0
Through Vol 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 107
RT Vol 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 30
Lane Flow Rate 8 11 24 24 0 0 0 137
Geometry Grp 77777777
Degree of Util (X) 0.012 0.014 0.036 0.028 0 0 0 0.17
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.186 4.685 5.411 4.208 4.957 4.957 4.626 4.472 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 685 757 666 856 0 0 0 799
Service Time 2.959 2.457 3.111 1.908 2.658 2.658 2.374 2.22 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 0.015 0.036 0.028 0 0 0 0.171
HCM Control Delay 8 7.5 8.3 7 7.7 7.7 7.4 8.1
HCM Lane LOS AAAANNNA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0.6
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1195 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 30
Future Vol, veh/h 30
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 2
Mvmt Flow 30
Number of Lanes 0
Approach
Opposing Approach
Opposing Lanes
Conflicting Approach Left
Conflicting Lanes Left
Conflicting Approach Right
Conflicting Lanes Right
HCM Control Delay

HCM LOS

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1196 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
11: Gold Dredege Way & Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 0 0 0 0 97
Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 0 0 0 97
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 0 150 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 19 0 0 0 0 97
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 53 53 99 0 - 0
Stage 1 51 -----
Stage 2 2 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 949 1003 1492 - - -
Stage 1 965 -----
Stage 2 1020 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 945 999 1489 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 945 -----
Stage 1 963 -----
Stage 2 1018 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1489 - 945 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.02 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 8.9 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1197 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
11: Gold Dredege Way & Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 0 0 0 0 97
Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 0 0 0 97
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 222222
Mvmt Flow 19 0 0 0 0 97
Number of Lanes 111111
Approach EB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 0
Conflicting Approach Right NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 0 2
HCM Control Delay 8.1 0 7

HCM LOS A - A

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 0 19 0 0 97
LT Vol 0 0 19 0 0 0
Through Vol 000000
RT Vol 0 0 0 0 0 97
Lane Flow Rate 0 0 19 0 0 97
Geometry Grp 777777
Degree of Util (X) 0 0 0.027 0 0 0.104
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.615 4.615 5.205 4.704 4.568 3.867 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 0 687 0 0 927
Service Time 2.346 2.346 2.941 2.44 2.287 1.587
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 0.028 0 0 0.105
HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.3 8.1 7.4 7.3 7
HCM Lane LOS N N A N N A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.3
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1198 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
12: Driveway 1/Sarapiqui Way & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 8 0 12 24 0
Future Vol, veh/h 30 8 0 12 24 0
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 022022
Mvmt Flow 30 8 0 12 24 0
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 7.2 6.4 7.3

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 79% 100%
Vol Thru, % 0% 0% 0%
Vol Right, % 100% 21% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 12 38 24
LT Vol 0 30 24
Through Vol 0 0 0
RT Vol 12 8 0
Lane Flow Rate 12 38 24
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.011 0.042 0.028
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.384 3.994 4.211
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 1057 899 852
Service Time 1.406 2.008 2.226
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.042 0.028
HCM Control Delay 6.4 7.2 7.3
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.1 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1199 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
13: Driveway 2 & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 36 0 0 38 0 12
Future Vol, veh/h 36 0 0 38 0 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22022
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22220
Mvmt Flow 36 0 0 38 0 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 40
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 1037
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - ---- 1033
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.5

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 1033 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1200 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
14: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 3 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 19 109 22
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 19 109 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 5 0 19 109 22
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 70 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 985 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 981 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 981 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1201 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
15: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 4 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 19 92 22
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 19 92 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 5 0 19 92 22
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 61 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 998 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 994 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.6 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 994 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1202 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
16: Industrial Driveway/Driveway 5 & Gold Dredege Way 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 17 4 0 97 0 0 0 2 0 0 36
Future Vol, veh/h 0 17 4 0 97 0 0 0 2 0 0 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222220
Mvmt Flow 0 17 4 0 97 0 0 0 2 0 0 36
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 23 - - 99
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - ------- 6.22 - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----------
Follow-up Hdwy - ------- 3.318 - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 1054 0 0 962
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - ------- 1050 - - 960
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.4 8.9

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1050 - - - 960
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.038
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - - 8.9
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1203 of 1447 ends

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Project Sunrise (Revised) 17: Gold Dredge Way & Driveway 6 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 36 211 122 0 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 36 211 122 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly flow rate (vph) 36 211 122 0 0 0
Pedestrians 2 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 124 409 126
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 124 409 126
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1475 583 923
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 247 122
Volume Left 36 0
Volume Right 0 0
cSH 1475 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0
Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 1.3 0.0
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1204 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
18: Mechanical Dr & Luyung Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour
2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 0 0 0 0 31
Future Vol, veh/h 81 0 0 0 0 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 81 0 0 0 0 31
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1 0 - 0 163 1
Stage 1 - - - - 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - 162 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - 828 1084
Stage 1 - - - - 1022 -
Stage 2 - - - - 867 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - 787 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 787 -
Stage 1 - - - - 971 -
Stage 2 - - - - 867 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 7.3 0 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1622 - - - 1084
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 - - - 0.029
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 - - - 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1205 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 152 356 159 3 281 533 658 75 265 1155 213 Future Volume (veh/h) 26 152 356 159 3 281 533 658 75 265 1155 213 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1767 1826 1826 1767 1826 1826 1856 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 152 356 159 281 533 658 265 1155 213 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 9 5 5 9 5 5 3 5
Cap, veh/h 207 843 388 346 1410 451 323 1462 446
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 3374 3357 1544 3374 4823 1544 3374 5066 1544 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 152 356 159 281 533 658 265 1155 213 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 1678 1544 1687 1608 1544 1687 1689 1544 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 10.4 10.1 9.5 10.3 34.2 9.0 24.6 13.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 10.4 10.1 9.5 10.3 34.2 9.0 24.6 13.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 207 843 388 346 1410 451 323 1462 446 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.42 0.41 0.81 0.38 1.46 0.82 0.79 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 843 388 458 1410 451 360 1494 455 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.0 36.7 36.6 51.4 32.9 41.4 51.9 38.4 34.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.9 0.3 0.7 8.1 0.2 218.1 12.9 2.9 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.3 7.5 6.8 7.7 7.0 60.8 7.7 15.4 8.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.9 37.0 37.3 59.5 33.1 259.5 64.9 41.2 35.1 LnGrp LOS E D D E C F E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 667 1472 1633
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.0 139.3 44.3
Approach LOS D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.5 39.8 17.5 35.2 16.7 47.6 12.7 40.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 6 5.5 * 5.8 5.5 6.0 5.5 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 * 35 15.9 * 27 12.5 42.0 8.5 34.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.6 26.6 11.5 12.4 11.0 34.3 7.2 36.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 7.0 0.5 4.9 0.2 7.3 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 67.1
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1206 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 488 1521 187
Future Volume (veh/h) 26 488 1521 187
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1856 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 488 1521 187
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 3 5
Cap, veh/h 549 1802 550
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.36 0.36
Sat Flow, veh/h 3374 5066 1545
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 488 1521 187
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 1689 1545
Q Serve(g_s), s 16.6 32.3 10.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.6 32.3 10.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 549 1802 550
V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.84 0.34
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 591 1818 554
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.0 34.7 27.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.7 3.8 0.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 12.5 19.2 6.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.7 38.5 28.0
LnGrp LOS E D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 2196
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.0
Approach LOS D
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1207 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 319 24 198 27 36 91 10 404 1287 5 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 319 24 198 27 36 91 10 404 1287 5 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 319 24 198 27 36 91 404 1287 5
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222 232
Cap, veh/h 423 400 595 33 49 125 401 2655 10
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1870 2782 1781 468 1182 3456 5209 20 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 319 24 198 27 0 127 404 834 458
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1870 1391 1781 0 1650 1728 1689 1852 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 0.9 5.5 1.4 0.0 6.8 10.5 14.6 14.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.1 0.9 5.5 1.4 0.0 6.8 10.5 14.6 14.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 423 400 595 33 0 174 401 1722 944 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.06 0.33 0.83 0.00 0.73 1.01 0.48 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 783 934 1389 120 0 536 401 1722 944 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.4 28.3 30.1 44.3 0.0 39.2 40.0 14.4 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.1 0.3 37.9 0.0 5.7 47.0 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.1 0.7 3.2 1.7 0.0 5.3 11.2 8.5 9.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.2 28.4 30.4 82.2 0.0 44.9 87.0 14.7 14.8 LnGrp LOS D C C F A D F B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 541 154 1696
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.7 51.5 31.9
Approach LOS D D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 51.7 6.8 25.0 16.0 42.8 16.6 15.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.7 5.5 * 5.1 * 5.6 5.5 * 5.5 5.5 5.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 14 35.3 * 6.1 * 45 10.5 * 38 20.5 29.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 16.6 3.4 7.5 12.5 27.4 10.1 8.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 15.8 0.0 1.1 0.0 9.9 1.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1208 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 38 1634 311
Future Volume (veh/h) 38 1634 311
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 1634 311
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 2
Cap, veh/h 48 2086 652
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.41 0.41
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 5066 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 38 1634 311
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1689 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 25.4 13.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 25.4 13.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 48 2086 652
V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.78 0.48
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 266 2110 659
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.8 23.1 19.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 24.5 2.0 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.0 14.4 8.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.3 25.1 20.0
LnGrp LOS E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1983
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.1
Approach LOS C
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1209 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 111 19 15 190 5 265 9 5 1128 68 45 88 Future Volume (veh/h) 111 19 15 190 5 265 9 5 1128 68 45 88 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 125 0 15 194 0 265 5 1128 68 88
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222 232 2
Cap, veh/h 217 0 95 663 0 294 7 2325 140 113
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.06 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 0 1569 3563 0 1580 1781 4885 294 1781 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 125 0 15 194 0 265 5 780 416 88
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1569 1781 0 1580 1781 1689 1802 1781 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 0.0 0.9 4.6 0.0 16.0 0.3 15.3 15.3 4.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 0.0 0.9 4.6 0.0 16.0 0.3 15.3 15.3 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 217 0 95 663 0 294 7 1607 858 113 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.00 0.16 0.29 0.00 0.90 0.72 0.49 0.49 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 750 0 330 684 0 303 95 1654 882 225 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.5 0.0 43.4 34.1 0.0 38.8 48.5 17.4 17.4 44.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 27.6 85.8 0.2 0.4 10.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.7 0.0 0.6 3.5 0.0 13.0 0.5 9.2 9.8 4.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.0 0.0 44.1 34.4 0.0 66.4 134.3 17.6 17.8 55.7 LnGrp LOS D A D C A E F B B E
Approach Vol, veh/h 140 459 1201
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.7 52.9 18.2
Approach LOS D D B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 51.5 11.4 5.2 57.2 23.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.7 5.1 5.5 * 4.8 5.1 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 12 47.7 20.5 * 5.2 54.7 18.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.7 17.3 5.3 2.3 24.2 18.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 22.5 0.4 0.0 27.8 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.8
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1210 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1695 23
Future Volume (veh/h) 1695 23
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1695 23
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 2
Cap, veh/h 2754 37
Arrive On Green 0.53 0.53
Sat Flow, veh/h 5150 70
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1111 607
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1689 1843
Q Serve(g_s), s 22.2 22.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22.2 22.2
Prop In Lane 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1806 985
V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.62
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1896 1035
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.7 15.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 12.1 13.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.3 16.7
LnGrp LOS B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1806
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.4
Approach LOS B
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1211 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 183 3 43 56 0 9 10 916 5 34 3 1885 Future Volume (veh/h) 183 3 43 56 0 9 10 916 5 34 3 1885 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000 00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 3 43 56 0 9 10 916 5 3 1885
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222 22
Cap, veh/h 239 4 216 89 0 79 22 2760 15 7 2712
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.53 0.53 0.00 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1754 29 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5241 29 1781 5206 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 186 0 43 56 0 9 10 595 326 3 1232
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1783 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1865 1781 1702 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 0.0 1.8 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 7.4 7.4 0.1 20.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 0.0 1.8 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 7.4 7.4 0.1 20.0 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 243 0 216 89 0 79 22 1793 982 7 1773 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.20 0.63 0.00 0.11 0.45 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 439 0 390 439 0 390 133 2172 1190 148 2209 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 28.2 34.2 0.0 33.4 36.0 10.0 10.0 36.5 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.0 0.0 0.4 7.1 0.0 0.6 13.3 0.1 0.2 34.1 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.1 0.0 1.2 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 4.4 4.9 0.2 11.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.6 0.0 28.6 41.4 0.0 34.0 49.4 10.1 10.2 70.7 13.9 LnGrp LOS D A C D A C D B B E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 229 65 931 1909
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.3 40.3 10.5 14.2
Approach LOS C D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.0 43.8 15.5 5.4 43.4 9.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.7 5.1 5.5 4.5 5.1 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 6.1 46.9 18.1 5.5 47.7 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 9.4 9.4 2.4 22.0 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.3 0.7 0.0 16.3 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1212 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21
Future Volume (veh/h) 21
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 30
Arrive On Green 0.52
Sat Flow, veh/h 58
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 674
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1860
Q Serve(g_s), s 20.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.0
Prop In Lane 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 969
V/C Ratio(X) 0.70
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1207
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 12.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.5
LnGrp LOS B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1213 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 650 19 13 994 0 68 0 23 1 0 4
Future Volume (veh/h) 3 650 19 13 994 0 68 0 23 1 0 4
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1767 1870 1870 1767 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 650 19 13 994 0 68 0 23 1 0 4
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 292292222222
Cap, veh/h 4 2144 63 17 2185 0 224 0 118 83 12 94
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.01 0.65 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3330 97 1781 3445 0 1401 0 1572 154 161 1261 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 327 342 13 994 0 68 0 23 5 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1678 1749 1781 1678 0 1401 0 1572 1576 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 5.2 5.3 0.4 8.9 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 5.2 5.3 0.4 8.9 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.80
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 4 1080 1126 17 2185 0 224 0 118 189 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.30 0.30 0.75 0.45 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.20 0.03 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 191 1727 1800 220 3510 0 893 0 867 918 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.3 4.8 4.8 30.0 5.3 0.0 27.3 0.0 26.4 26.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 111.2 0.2 0.2 47.4 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.3 1.9 1.9 0.7 3.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 141.5 4.9 4.9 77.4 5.4 0.0 28.0 0.0 27.2 26.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F AAEAACACCAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 672 1007 91 5
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 6.3 27.8 26.1
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 6.1 44.6 10.0 5.6 45.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.5 7.5 62.5 33.5 6.5 63.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 2.4 7.3 2.2 2.1 10.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 28.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.2
HCM 6th LOS A
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1214 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 520 126 18 622 30 1 264 43 30 20 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 520 126 18 622 30 1 264 43 30 20 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1767 1870 1870 1767 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 520 126 18 622 30 264 43 30 20 51 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 292292 22222
Cap, veh/h 6 1155 544 23 1153 56 345 199 139 145 76
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3357 1580 1781 3259 157 1781 1024 715 1781 934 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 520 126 18 320 332 264 0 73 20 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1678 1580 1781 1678 1738 1781 0 1739 1781 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 7.2 3.4 0.6 9.1 9.1 8.4 0.0 2.1 0.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 7.2 3.4 0.6 9.1 9.1 8.4 0.0 2.1 0.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.41 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 6 1155 544 23 594 615 345 0 337 145 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.45 0.23 0.78 0.54 0.54 0.76 0.00 0.22 0.14 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 223 1711 806 253 884 915 1087 0 1061 670 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.8 15.2 14.0 29.4 15.4 15.4 22.8 0.0 20.3 25.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 92.5 0.3 0.2 41.9 0.8 0.7 3.5 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.4 4.1 1.9 0.9 5.3 5.5 6.4 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 122.3 15.5 14.2 71.3 16.2 16.2 26.4 0.0 20.6 26.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F BBEBB CACCA
Approach Vol, veh/h 650 670 337 114
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.9 17.7 25.1 31.1
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.1 6.3 26.1 10.4 5.7 26.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.5 8.5 30.5 22.5 7.5 31.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4 2.6 9.2 5.2 2.1 11.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.0 8.8 0.3 0.0 10.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1215 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 43
Future Volume (veh/h) 43
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 64
Arrive On Green 0.08
Sat Flow, veh/h 788
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 94
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1722
Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2
Prop In Lane 0.46
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 140
V/C Ratio(X) 0.67
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 648
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.2
LnGrp LOS C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1216 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
7: Gold Drdege Way & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 320 70 55 123 24 128
Future Vol, veh/h 320 70 55 123 24 128
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 20220
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 320 70 55 123 24 128
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 297 121 0 0 180 0
Stage 1 119 -----
Stage 2 178 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 694 930 - - 1396 -
Stage 1 906 -----
Stage 2 853 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 678 926 - - 1393 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 678 -----
Stage 1 904 -----
Stage 2 835 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16 0 1.2

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 712 1393 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.548 0.017 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16 7.6 0
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 3.4 0.1 -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1217 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
8: Luyung Dr & Gold Drdege Way 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 11.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 115 23 6 371 9 15 67 3 4 58 8
Future Vol, veh/h 14 115 23 6 371 9 15 67 3 4 58 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 14 115 23 6 371 9 15 67 3 4 58 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 363 174 66 242 177 73 68 0 0 72 0 0 Stage 1 72 72 - 101 101 -------
Stage 2 291 102 - 141 76 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 593 719 998 712 717 989 1533 - - 1528 - - Stage 1 938 835 - 905 811 -------
Stage 2 717 811 - 862 832 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 339 707 994 600 705 985 1530 - - 1525 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 339 707 - 600 705 -------
Stage 1 927 831 - 894 801 -------
Stage 2 377 801 - 722 828 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12 16 1.3 0.4

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1530 - - 669 708 1525 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.227 0.545 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 12 16 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.9 3.3 0 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1218 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 9: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 211 146 22 137 306 68
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 211 146 22 137 306 68
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1767 1870 1870 1767 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 211 146 22 137 306 68
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 922922
Cap, veh/h 935 440 58 1573 636 318
Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.47 0.18 0.18
Sat Flow, veh/h 3445 1579 3456 3445 3456 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 211 146 22 137 306 68
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1678 1579 1728 1678 1728 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 2.3 0.2 0.7 2.5 1.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 2.3 0.2 0.7 2.5 1.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 935 440 58 1573 636 318
V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.33 0.38 0.09 0.48 0.21
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 5564 2618 2346 7313 3219 1503
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.8 9.1 15.4 4.7 11.6 10.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.4 4.1 0.0 0.6 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.9 9.5 19.5 4.7 12.1 10.9
LnGrp LOS AABABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 357 159 374
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.2 6.7 11.9
Approach LOS A A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 6.0 14.3 20.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 21.5 52.5 69.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 2.2 4.3 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.0 4.4 2.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.9
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1219 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 60 7 35 28 68 36
Future Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 60 7 35 28 68 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 022022022202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - - None
Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - 150 - - - 200 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 60 7 35 28 68 36
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 300 337 56 282 352 38 106 0 0 67 69 0 0 Stage 1 214 214 - 120 120 --------
Stage 2 86 123 - 162 232 --------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 --------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 --------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 630 583 999 648 571 1026 1483 - - 1297 1530 - - Stage 1 768 724 - 872 796 --------
Stage 2 912 793 - 824 711 --------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 589 544 995 605 533 1022 1480 - - 1379 1379 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 589 544 - 605 533 --------
Stage 1 753 689 - 855 780 --------
Stage 2 881 777 - 772 677 --------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16.2 9.1 2.1 2.9

HCM LOS C A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1480 - - 589 995 605 1022 1379 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - 0.48 0.016 0.007 0.014 0.046 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 16.6 8.7 11 8.6 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C ABAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 2.6 0 0 0 0.1 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1220 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 60 7 35 28 68
Future Vol, veh/h 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 60 7 35 28 68
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 283 0 16 4 0 14 27 60 7 35 28 68
Number of Lanes 110110110011
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2222
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2222
HCM Control Delay 12.9 8 9.1 9.2

HCM LOS BAAA

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 90% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 65%
Vol Right, % 0% 10% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 35%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 27 67 283 16 4 14 63 104
LT Vol 27 0 283 0 4 0 63 0
Through Vol 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 68
RT Vol 0 7 0 16 0 14 0 36
Lane Flow Rate 27 67 283 16 4 14 63 104
Geometry Grp 77777777
Degree of Util (X) 0.046 0.104 0.451 0.02 0.007 0.019 0.106 0.153 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.143 5.565 5.742 4.537 6.085 4.874 6.054 5.307 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 580 641 625 784 584 727 590 673
Service Time 3.908 3.33 3.498 2.292 3.864 2.653 3.812 3.064 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 0.105 0.453 0.02 0.007 0.019 0.107 0.155 HCM Control Delay 9.2 9 13.2 7.4 8.9 7.7 9.5 9
HCM Lane LOS AABAAAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.3 2.3 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.5
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1221 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
10: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 36
Future Vol, veh/h 36
Peak Hour Factor 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 2
Mvmt Flow 36
Number of Lanes 0
Approach
Opposing Approach
Opposing Lanes
Conflicting Approach Left
Conflicting Lanes Left
Conflicting Approach Right
Conflicting Lanes Right
HCM Control Delay

HCM LOS

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1222 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
11: Gold Dredege Way & Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 94 0 0 0 0 155
Future Vol, veh/h 94 0 0 0 0 155
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 0 150 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 94 0 0 0 0 155
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 82 82 157 0 - 0
Stage 1 80 -----
Stage 2 2 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 911 961 1420 - - -
Stage 1 934 -----
Stage 2 1020 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 907 957 1417 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 907 -----
Stage 1 932 -----
Stage 2 1018 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1417 - 907 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.104 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 9.4 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1223 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
11: Gold Dredege Way & Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 94 0 0 0 0 155
Future Vol, veh/h 94 0 0 0 0 155
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 222222
Mvmt Flow 94 0 0 0 0 155
Number of Lanes 111111
Approach EB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 0
Conflicting Approach Right NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 0 2
HCM Control Delay 9 0 7.7

HCM LOS A - A

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 0 94 0 0 155
LT Vol 0 0 94 0 0 0
Through Vol 000000
RT Vol 0 0 0 0 0 155
Lane Flow Rate 0 0 94 0 0 155
Geometry Grp 777777
Degree of Util (X) 0 0 0.139 0 0 0.177
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.92 4.92 5.308 4.807 4.809 4.107 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 0 670 0 0 879
Service Time 2.623 2.623 3.085 2.584 2.509 1.807
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0 0.14 0 0 0.176
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.6 9 7.6 7.5 7.7
HCM Lane LOS N N A N N A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.6
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1224 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
12: Driveway 1/Sarapiqui Way & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 36 27 0 141 16 0
Future Vol, veh/h 36 27 0 141 16 0
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 022022
Mvmt Flow 36 27 0 141 16 0
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7 7.5

HCM LOS A A A

Page 1225 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
13: Driveway 2 & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 157 0 0 63 0 141
Future Vol, veh/h 157 0 0 63 0 141
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22022
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22220
Mvmt Flow 157 0 0 63 0 141
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 161
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 889
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 886
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.8

Page 1226 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
14: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 3 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 94 61 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 94 61 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 61 0 94 61 27
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 48 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1017 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 1013 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1013 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.06 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1227 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
15: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 4 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 94 95 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 61 0 94 95 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 61 0 94 95 27
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 65 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 992 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 988 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 988 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.062 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1228 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
16: Industrial Driveway/Driveway 5 & Gold Dredege Way 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 82 3 0 155 0 0 0 12 0 0 21
Future Vol, veh/h 0 82 3 0 155 0 0 0 12 0 0 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222220
Mvmt Flow 0 82 3 0 155 0 0 0 12 0 0 21
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 88 - - 157
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - ------- 6.22 - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----------
Follow-up Hdwy - ------- 3.318 - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 970 0 0 894
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - - 966 - - 892
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.8 9.1

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 966 - - - 892
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.024
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - - 9.1
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1229 of 1447 ends

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Project Sunrise (Revised) 17: Gold Dredge Way & Driveway 6 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Project Sunrise (Revised) Synchro 11 Report
NV5 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 27 89 362 0 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 27 89 362 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 89 362 0 0 0
Pedestrians 2 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 364 509 366
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 364 509 366
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 98 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1206 511 678
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 116 362
Volume Left 27 0
Volume Right 0 0
cSH 1206 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.21
Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0
Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.0
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 2.0 0.0
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1230 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Project Sunrise (Revised)
18: Mechanical Dr & Luyung Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour
2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 0 0 0 0 64
Future Vol, veh/h 10 0 0 0 0 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 10 0 0 0 0 64
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1 0 - 0 21 1
Stage 1 - - - - 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - 20 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - 996 1084
Stage 1 - - - - 1022 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1003 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - 990 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 990 -
Stage 1 - - - - 1016 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1003 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 7.2 0 8.5

Page 1231 of 1447 ends

Build+ (2023)
(2023 With Project + Potential Industrial Park)
White Rock Road at Sunrise Boulevard with Revised
Westbound Lane Striping
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1232 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned Synchro 11 Report NV5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 61 145 384 135 172 244 355 50 193 1246 146 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 61 145 384 135 172 244 355 50 193 1246 146 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1648 1796 1796 1648 1796 1796 1841 1796 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 145 384 135 172 244 355 193 1246 146 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 17 7 7 17 7 7 4 7
Cap, veh/h 213 575 278 242 602 513 270 1676 507
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 3319 3131 1517 3319 3131 2671 3319 5025 1520 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 145 384 135 172 244 355 193 1246 146 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1659 1566 1517 1659 1566 1335 1659 1675 1520 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 10.8 7.5 4.8 6.4 11.7 5.3 20.7 6.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 10.8 7.5 4.8 6.4 11.7 5.3 20.7 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 213 575 278 242 602 513 270 1676 507 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.67 0.48 0.71 0.41 0.69 0.71 0.74 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 335 804 390 335 804 686 482 1733 524 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.2 35.8 34.5 42.7 33.3 35.5 42.2 27.8 23.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.8 1.4 1.3 4.3 0.4 1.9 3.5 1.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.1 7.2 4.9 3.6 4.3 6.7 4.0 12.6 4.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.0 37.2 35.8 47.0 33.8 37.4 45.7 29.5 23.5 LnGrp LOS DDDDCD DCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 664 771 1585
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.0 38.4 31.0
Approach LOS D D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.4 37.4 12.4 23.1 13.2 45.6 11.5 23.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 6 5.5 * 5.8 5.5 6.0 5.5 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 * 33 9.5 * 24 13.7 39.8 9.5 24.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.6 22.7 6.8 12.8 7.3 18.2 6.0 13.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 8.7 0.2 4.5 0.4 17.0 0.2 3.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1233 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned Synchro 11 Report NV5
Movement SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 461 1150 145
Future Volume (veh/h) 461 1150 145
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1841 1796
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 461 1150 145
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 4 7
Cap, veh/h 558 2112 639
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.42 0.42
Sat Flow, veh/h 3319 5025 1520
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 461 1150 145
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1659 1675 1520
Q Serve(g_s), s 12.6 16.2 5.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.6 16.2 5.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 558 2112 639
V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.54 0.23
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 757 2122 642
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.9 20.5 17.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.3 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 9.1 9.8 3.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.4 20.8 17.7
LnGrp LOS D C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1756
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5
Approach LOS C
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1234 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned Synchro 11 Report NV5
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 152 356 159 3 281 533 658 75 265 1155 213 Future Volume (veh/h) 26 152 356 159 3 281 533 658 75 265 1155 213 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1767 1826 1826 1767 1826 1826 1856 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 152 356 159 281 533 658 265 1155 213 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 9 5 5 9 5 5 3 5
Cap, veh/h 213 696 320 345 827 669 337 1594 486
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.10 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 3374 3357 1543 3374 3357 2717 3374 5066 1544 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 152 356 159 281 533 658 265 1155 213 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 1678 1543 1687 1678 1358 1687 1689 1544 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 10.4 10.1 9.0 15.7 26.6 8.5 22.4 12.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 10.4 10.1 9.0 15.7 26.6 8.5 22.4 12.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 213 696 320 345 827 669 337 1594 486 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.51 0.50 0.81 0.64 0.98 0.79 0.72 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 321 736 338 412 827 669 504 1675 511 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 38.8 38.7 48.5 37.3 41.4 48.5 33.6 30.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.4 0.6 1.2 10.2 1.7 30.5 4.8 1.5 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.8 7.5 6.8 7.5 10.5 16.8 6.6 13.8 7.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.1 39.4 39.9 58.7 39.0 71.8 53.4 35.1 30.7 LnGrp LOS E D D E D E D D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 667 1472 1633
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.1 57.4 37.5
Approach LOS D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.2 40.7 16.8 28.7 16.5 48.4 12.5 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 6 5.5 * 5.8 5.5 6.0 5.5 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 * 37 13.5 * 24 16.5 43.0 10.5 27.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.5 24.4 11.0 12.4 10.5 31.2 6.9 28.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 10.4 0.3 4.3 0.6 11.1 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.5
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

User approved changes to right turn type.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1235 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Project Sunrise (Revised) 1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned Synchro 11 Report NV5
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 488 1521 187
Future Volume (veh/h) 26 488 1521 187
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1856 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 488 1521 187
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 3 5
Cap, veh/h 571 1946 593
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.38 0.38
Sat Flow, veh/h 3374 5066 1545
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 488 1521 187
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 1689 1545
Q Serve(g_s), s 15.5 29.2 9.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.5 29.2 9.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 571 1946 593
V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.78 0.32
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 718 1973 602
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.5 29.9 23.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 2.1 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 11.2 17.0 6.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.7 32.0 24.1
LnGrp LOS D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 2196
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.9
Approach LOS D
Timer - Assigned Phs
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1236 of 1447 ends

Local Transportation Analysis for
Rancho Cordova, CA Receiving Center

Appendix F – Potential Traffic from Anticipated Industrial Park

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1237 of 1447 ends

Trip Generation
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1238 of 1447 ends

Industrial Park (130) Based upon methodology from ITE's Trip Generation, 10th Edition (2017) Project Trips
Project Land Use Total Inbound Outbound Variable Equation Used1 Industrial Park Autos 819,000 SF 1000 S.F.

Daily 2,335 1,168 1,168 LN(T) = 0.52LN(X) + 4.45 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 295 250 45 T = 0.40(X) 81% 19%
PM Peak Hour 295 57 238 T = 0.40(X) 21% 79%
Trucks
Daily 467 234 234
AM Peak Hour 33 15 18
PM Peak Hour 33 12 21
All Vehicles
Daily 2,802 1,401 1,401
AM Peak Hour 328 265 63
PM Peak Hour 328 69 259
Note:
1 Where: T = Trips; X = Density by Variable
Project
Density
In/Out
Distribution
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1239 of 1447 ends

Trip Distribution and Traffic Volume Figures
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1240 of 1447 ends

Figure F - 1
Potential Industrial
Trip Distribution -
Passenger Vehicles
Rancho Cordova, CA
Project Sunrise
Legend
%(%) = In (Out) Distribution
= Traffic Volume Direction
White Rock
Road
Gold Dredge
Way
Fitzgerald
Road
Luyung
Drive
Sunrise
Boulevard
International
Drive
Gold Valley
Drive
Gold Dredge
Way
International
Drive
Driveway6
Driveway1
Driveway 3
Driveway2
Driveway 4
Driveway5
International
Drive
(40%)
(20%) 20%
40%
SPEED
LIMIT
30 Rancho Cordova
Parkway
Rancho Cordova
Parkway
20%
(20%)
(20%)
20%
(10%)
(40%)
10%
40%
10%
(10%)
Mechinical
Drive
(40%)
40%
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
35 SPEED
LIMIT
35 (15%)
(25%)15% 25%
(50%)
(25%)
25%(75%)
75%
10%
(15%)
(10%)15%
(25%)
25%
(25%)
25%
(75%)
75%
(25%)
25%
(25%)
25%
25%
(20%)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
45 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1241 of 1447 ends

Figure F - 2
Potential Industrial
Passenger Vehicle
Trips
Project Sunrise
Rancho Cordova, CA
Legend
00(00) = AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
= Traffic Volume Direction
White Rock
Road
Gold Dredge
Way
Fitzgerald
Road
Luyung
Drive
Sunrise
Boulevard
International
Drive
Gold Valley
Drive
Gold Dredge
Way
International
Drive
Driveway 6
Driveway 1
Driveway
3 Driveway 2
Driveway
4 Driveway 5
International
Drive
0 (0)0 (0)18 (95)0 (0)
9 (48)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
50 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
100 (23)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
30 Rancho Cordova
Parkway
Rancho Cordova
Parkway
50 (11)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
9 (48)
9 (48) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
50 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
5 (24)
18 (95)
0 (0)
25 (6)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
100 (23)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
25 (6)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
5 (24)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Mechinical
Drive
18 (95)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
100 (23)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
35 SPEED
LIMIT
35 7 (36)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
38 (9)
63 (14)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
23 (119)
11 (60)
0 (0)
63 (14) 34 (179) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
188 (43)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
25 (6)
7 (36)
5 (24)
0 (0)
38 (9)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
0 (0)
0 (0)
34 (179)
0 (0)
188 (43)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
63 (14)
9 (48)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
45 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1242 of 1447 ends

Figure F - 3
Potential Industrial
Trip Distribution -
Trucks
Rancho Cordova, CA
Project Sunrise
Legend
%(%) = In (Out) Distribution
= Traffic Volume Direction
White Rock
Road
Gold Dredge
Way
Fitzgerald
Road
Luyung
Drive
Sunrise
Boulevard
International
Drive
Gold Valley
Drive
Gold Dredge
Way
International
Drive
Driveway6
Driveway1
Driveway 3
Driveway2
Driveway 4
Driveway5
International
Drive
(90%)
90%
SPEED
LIMIT
30 Rancho Cordova
Parkway
Rancho Cordova
Parkway
(90%)
90%
(5%)
(90%)
5%
90%
(5%)
5%
5%
(5%)
Mechinical
Drive
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
35 SPEED
LIMIT
35 (95%) (95%) (5%)
5%95%
(100%)
100%
5%
(5%)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
45 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1243 of 1447 ends

Figure F - 4
Potential Industrial
Truck Trips
Rancho Cordova, CA
Project Sunrise
Legend
00(00) = AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
= Traffic Volume Direction
White Rock
Road
Gold Dredge
Way
Fitzgerald
Road
Luyung
Drive
Sunrise
Boulevard
International
Drive
Gold Valley
Drive
Gold Dredge
Way
International
Drive
Driveway 6
Driveway 1
Driveway
3 Driveway 2
Driveway
4 Driveway 5
International
Drive
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
16 (19)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
14 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
30 Rancho Cordova
Parkway
Rancho Cordova
Parkway
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
16 (19)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
14 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
16 (19)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
14 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
1 (1)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Mechinical
Drive
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
35 SPEED
LIMIT
35 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
17 (20)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0) 17 (20) 1 (1) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
14 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
18 (21)
0 (0)
15 (12)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
45 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1244 of 1447 ends

Figure F - 5
Potential Industrial
Trips
Rancho Cordova, CA
Project Sunrise
Legend
00(00) = AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
= Traffic Volume Direction
White Rock
Road
Gold Dredge
Way
Fitzgerald
Road
Luyung
Drive
Sunrise
Boulevard
International
Drive
Gold Valley
Drive
Gold Dredge
Way
International
Drive
Driveway 6
Driveway 1
Driveway
3 Driveway 2
Driveway
4 Driveway 5
International
Drive
0 (0)0 (0)18 (95)0 (0)
9 (48)
0 (0)
16 (19)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
50 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
14 (11)
100 (23)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
30 Rancho Cordova
Parkway
Rancho Cordova
Parkway
50 (11)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
25 (67) 0 (0)
9 (48) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
64 (22)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
6 (25)
34 (114)
0 (0)
26 (7)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
114 (34)
0 (0)
0 (0)1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
26 (7)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
6 (25)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Mechinical
Drive
18 (95)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
100 (23)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
35 SPEED
LIMIT
35 7 (36)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
38 (9)
63 (14)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
40 (139)
11 (60)
0 (0)
63 (14) 51 (199) 1 (1) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
202 (54)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
25 (6)
7 (36)
5 (24)
0 (0)
38 (9)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
0 (0)
0 (0)
52 (200)
0 (0)
203 (55)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
11 (60)
0 (0)
0 (0)
63 (14)
63 (14)
9 (48)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
1 (1)
0 (0)
SPEED
LIMIT
45 SPEED
LIMIT
45 ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1245 of 1447 ends

Local Transportation Analysis for
Rancho Cordova, CA Receiving Center

Appendix G – Queuing Results for Signalized Intersections

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1246 of 1447 ends

2023 No Build
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1247 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 206 369 85 172 237 323 234 1198 124 371 1104 145 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.63 0.22 0.55 0.28 0.74 0.61 0.69 0.20 0.73 0.58 0.22 Control Delay 54.9 43.5 2.4 52.3 36.8 26.1 51.4 31.9 4.6 51.2 27.4 4.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.9 43.5 2.4 52.3 36.8 26.1 51.4 31.9 4.6 51.2 27.4 4.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 120 0 56 50 75 76 249 0 121 211 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 170 9 96 75 178 123 330 34 180 282 42 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 348 775 469 348 1114 516 437 1770 625 580 1949 680 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.48 0.18 0.49 0.21 0.63 0.54 0.68 0.20 0.64 0.57 0.21 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1248 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 52 269 7 54 216 1414 85 943 265 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.13 0.34 0.06 0.29 0.81 0.62 0.51 0.41 0.31 Control Delay 32.8 23.5 4.8 36.6 20.2 59.1 17.6 45.4 14.5 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.8 23.5 4.8 36.6 20.2 59.1 17.6 45.4 14.5 3.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 18 0 3 7 52 186 39 108 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 50 32 16 40 #121 263 #100 158 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1427 723 1395 938
Turn Bay Length (ft) 420 300 150 400 425 235
Base Capacity (vph) 1000 1242 1918 110 710 268 2272 168 2318 866 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.04 0.14 0.06 0.08 0.81 0.62 0.51 0.41 0.31 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1249 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 19 1 24 25 29 10 1664 61 937
v/c Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.15 0.16 0.11 0.08 0.52 0.36 0.25 Control Delay 38.6 38.7 0.0 38.5 38.5 0.9 40.6 12.5 42.8 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 38.6 38.7 0.0 38.5 38.5 0.9 40.6 12.5 42.8 6.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 10 0 12 13 0 5 223 31 67
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 32 0 37 38 0 21 298 72 134
Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 855 2083 1722
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 140 140 250 245
Base Capacity (vph) 497 502 548 439 443 498 122 3202 186 3724 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.52 0.33 0.25 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1250 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 21 7 14 1750 29 949
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.11 0.02 0.08 0.46 0.16 0.24
Control Delay 37.0 38.5 0.1 40.6 9.4 40.3 6.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.0 38.5 0.1 40.6 9.4 40.3 6.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 9 0 6 83 12 35
Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 34 0 27 320 44 142
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 347 1611 2083
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 215 240
Base Capacity (vph) 577 575 598 165 3815 193 3922
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.46 0.15 0.24
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1251 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 623 4 545 13 18 1
v/c Ratio 0.22 0.01 0.18 0.02 0.03 0.00
Control Delay 3.3 15.5 1.3 14.3 0.1 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.3 15.5 1.3 14.3 0.1 0.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 000100
Queue Length 95th (ft) 100 9 44 17 0 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 850 652 1122 258
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 200
Base Capacity (vph) 3210 560 3224 1663 1429 1458
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.01 0.17 0.01 0.01 0.00
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1252 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour 2023 No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 285 161 19 364 136 91 15 39
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.18 0.06 0.27 0.29 0.19 0.05 0.12
Control Delay 27.0 12.8 4.0 30.2 19.0 25.4 21.6 29.6 18.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 27.0 12.8 4.0 30.2 19.0 25.4 21.6 29.6 18.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 30 0 6 59 45 24 5 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 85 39 29 115 110 71 24 34
Internal Link Dist (ft) 652 785 4269 119
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 756 2150 1082 420 1770 1203 1222 894 858 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.05 0.21 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.05 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1253 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 338 148 284 452 401 292 1117 186 455 1486 187 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.54 0.32 0.68 0.40 0.74 0.79 0.68 0.28 0.81 0.78 0.27 Control Delay 66.7 44.5 2.1 56.4 36.8 23.9 65.5 36.7 3.1 57.4 35.3 5.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.7 44.5 2.1 56.4 36.8 23.9 65.5 36.7 3.1 57.4 35.3 5.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 66 117 0 103 101 107 108 267 0 163 352 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) #122 166 3 155 133 223 #186 345 30 #235 449 56 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 259 821 544 486 1506 641 382 1639 653 627 1903 692 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.41 0.27 0.58 0.30 0.63 0.76 0.68 0.28 0.73 0.78 0.27 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1254 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 305 24 198 27 116 285 1197 43 1588 311 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.53 0.72 0.55 0.46 0.76 0.40 Control Delay 42.6 28.0 5.3 48.0 25.2 51.9 22.6 54.5 26.9 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.6 28.0 5.3 48.0 25.2 51.9 22.6 54.5 26.9 6.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 10 0 15 20 82 198 23 279 23
Queue Length 95th (ft) 134 32 29 45 74 #155 286 63 396 92 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1427 723 1395 938
Turn Bay Length (ft) 420 300 150 400 425 235
Base Capacity (vph) 770 921 1456 118 585 394 2183 107 2077 785 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.03 0.14 0.23 0.20 0.72 0.55 0.40 0.76 0.40 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1255 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 66 15 64 65 51 14 1179 75 1718 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.38 0.05 0.37 0.38 0.17 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.50 Control Delay 48.2 48.2 0.3 48.2 48.2 1.3 49.5 16.1 48.9 11.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.2 48.2 0.3 48.2 48.2 1.3 49.5 16.1 48.9 11.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 40 0 37 38 0 8 165 43 187
Queue Length 95th (ft) 87 90 0 87 88 0 31 250 95 359
Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 855 2083 1722
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 140 140 250 245
Base Capacity (vph) 405 412 493 369 372 463 108 2980 256 3373 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.13 0.40 0.29 0.51 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1256 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 43 54 9 10 902 37 1840
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.12 0.32 0.04 0.10 0.34 0.28 0.64
Control Delay 46.8 0.7 48.0 0.2 50.1 15.7 51.1 16.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.8 0.7 48.0 0.2 50.1 15.7 51.1 16.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 101 0 30 0 6 124 21 244
Queue Length 95th (ft) 200 0 78 0 26 188 62 453
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 347 1611 2083
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 215 240
Base Capacity (vph) 450 483 374 421 105 3132 143 3233
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.09 0.14 0.02 0.10 0.29 0.26 0.57 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1257 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 565 13 657 68 23 5
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.25 0.03 0.28 0.15 0.03 0.01
Control Delay 20.3 6.7 19.5 6.7 16.4 0.1 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 20.3 6.7 19.5 6.7 16.4 0.1 0.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 30 2 36 10 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 105 18 121 52 0 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 850 652 1122 258
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 400 200
Base Capacity (vph) 430 3390 496 3406 1508 1405 1333
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.17 0.03 0.19 0.05 0.02 0.00
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1258 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour 2023 No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 430 112 18 374 205 73 20 94
v/c Ratio 0.02 0.41 0.20 0.08 0.36 0.47 0.16 0.07 0.32
Control Delay 33.2 19.3 5.1 32.1 18.1 26.1 15.6 28.6 23.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.2 19.3 5.1 32.1 18.1 26.1 15.6 28.6 23.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 54 0 5 45 53 10 5 17
Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 149 32 31 124 171 54 31 79
Internal Link Dist (ft) 652 785 4269 119
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 273 2097 996 310 2122 1234 1220 821 816 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.21 0.11 0.06 0.18 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.12 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1259 of 1447 ends

2023 Build
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1260 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build AM Peak Hour 2023 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 206 384 85 172 244 337 234 1230 146 401 1136 145 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.22 0.56 0.29 0.77 0.63 0.71 0.24 0.77 0.59 0.22 Control Delay 55.6 43.8 2.4 53.6 37.1 29.0 52.5 32.8 6.5 53.5 27.6 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.6 43.8 2.4 53.6 37.1 29.0 52.5 32.8 6.5 53.5 27.6 5.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 126 0 58 52 89 78 266 4 134 223 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 176 9 96 77 196 123 340 49 195 290 42 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 342 772 468 332 1096 509 421 1734 615 571 1935 675 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.50 0.18 0.52 0.22 0.66 0.56 0.71 0.24 0.70 0.59 0.21 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1261 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build AM Peak Hour 2023 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 52 269 7 54 223 1453 85 975 265 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.13 0.33 0.06 0.29 0.84 0.64 0.51 0.42 0.31 Control Delay 32.9 23.3 4.7 36.9 20.4 62.9 18.1 45.8 14.8 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.9 23.3 4.7 36.9 20.4 62.9 18.1 45.8 14.8 3.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 18 0 3 7 54 195 39 113 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 72 50 31 16 41 #127 276 #100 167 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1427 723 1395 938
Turn Bay Length (ft) 420 300 150 400 425 235
Base Capacity (vph) 996 1236 1911 110 707 267 2261 167 2308 863 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.04 0.14 0.06 0.08 0.84 0.64 0.51 0.42 0.31 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1262 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build AM Peak Hour 2023 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 19 1 27 27 68 10 1673 93 937
v/c Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.27 0.09 0.60 0.55 0.26 Control Delay 39.0 39.0 0.0 39.3 39.2 4.1 41.0 14.2 51.7 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.0 39.0 0.0 39.3 39.2 4.1 41.0 14.2 51.7 6.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 10 0 14 14 0 5 225 49 67
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 33 0 41 41 9 21 302 #119 135
Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 855 2083 1722
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 140 140 250 245
Base Capacity (vph) 449 454 507 397 401 462 110 2800 168 3549 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.09 0.60 0.55 0.26 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1263 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build AM Peak Hour 2023 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 23 7 14 1761 29 954
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.13 0.03 0.09 0.48 0.17 0.25
Control Delay 38.9 40.0 0.1 42.1 10.5 41.9 6.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 38.9 40.0 0.1 42.1 10.5 41.9 6.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 11 0 7 166 15 71
Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 37 0 27 325 44 144
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 347 1611 2083
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 215 240
Base Capacity (vph) 522 521 553 149 3704 175 3816
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.48 0.17 0.25
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1264 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build AM Peak Hour 2023 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 690 4 565 13 18 1
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.01 0.19 0.03 0.03 0.00
Control Delay 3.2 16.8 1.2 15.6 0.1 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.2 16.8 1.2 15.6 0.1 0.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 000100
Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 9 46 17 0 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 850 652 1122 258
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 200
Base Capacity (vph) 3212 515 3224 1652 1418 1449
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.01 0.18 0.01 0.01 0.00
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1265 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build AM Peak Hour 2023 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 352 161 19 384 136 91 15 39
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.21 0.18 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.05 0.12
Control Delay 27.3 12.8 4.0 30.5 19.0 25.7 21.8 29.9 19.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 27.3 12.8 4.0 30.5 19.0 25.7 21.8 29.9 19.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 38 0 6 63 45 25 5 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) 76 103 39 28 122 111 72 24 34
Internal Link Dist (ft) 652 785 4269 119
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 752 2143 1079 416 1761 1198 1216 889 853 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.16 0.15 0.05 0.22 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.05 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1266 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 356 148 284 533 563 292 1136 213 491 1510 187 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.45 0.28 0.70 0.39 0.93 0.83 0.77 0.35 0.87 0.85 0.28 Control Delay 72.8 41.7 1.6 59.9 35.5 47.3 72.5 42.7 5.2 65.2 41.4 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 72.8 41.7 1.6 59.9 35.5 47.3 72.5 42.7 5.2 65.2 41.4 6.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 125 0 109 121 266 115 297 0 192 395 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) #122 175 3 155 156 #493 #186 352 50 #275 459 56 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 242 789 532 454 1406 614 357 1482 612 585 1777 657 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.45 0.28 0.63 0.38 0.92 0.82 0.77 0.35 0.84 0.85 0.28 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1267 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 323 24 198 27 116 366 1225 43 1612 311 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.05 0.23 0.24 0.53 0.93 0.49 0.29 0.78 0.40 Control Delay 42.7 27.8 5.2 48.4 25.3 74.4 18.6 46.0 27.7 7.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.7 27.8 5.2 48.4 25.3 74.4 18.6 46.0 27.7 7.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 91 10 0 15 20 109 182 24 287 25
Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 32 29 45 74 #222 283 60 410 95 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1427 723 1395 938
Turn Bay Length (ft) 420 300 150 400 425 235
Base Capacity (vph) 765 915 1448 117 582 392 2498 259 2064 780 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.03 0.14 0.23 0.20 0.93 0.49 0.17 0.78 0.40 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1268 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 66 15 84 86 151 14 1189 99 1718 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.40 0.05 0.46 0.47 0.49 0.14 0.46 0.52 0.56 Control Delay 50.2 50.3 0.3 50.4 50.6 12.5 51.3 17.6 53.0 14.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 50.2 50.3 0.3 50.4 50.6 12.5 51.3 17.6 53.0 14.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 42 0 52 54 0 9 178 59 197
Queue Length 95th (ft) 89 91 0 109 111 55 31 261 121 373 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 855 2083 1722
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 140 140 250 245
Base Capacity (vph) 375 381 468 342 344 441 100 2694 237 3074 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.34 0.14 0.44 0.42 0.56 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1269 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 43 55 9 10 913 37 1881
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.12 0.34 0.04 0.10 0.34 0.29 0.66
Control Delay 48.1 0.7 48.8 0.2 50.6 15.5 52.2 17.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.1 0.7 48.8 0.2 50.6 15.5 52.2 17.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 0 31 0 6 126 21 261
Queue Length 95th (ft) 200 0 80 0 26 191 62 480
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 347 1611 2083
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 215 240
Base Capacity (vph) 437 482 363 422 100 3042 134 3074
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.09 0.15 0.02 0.10 0.30 0.28 0.61 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1270 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 646 13 899 68 23 5
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.26 0.04 0.36 0.20 0.04 0.01
Control Delay 28.0 5.7 26.8 6.2 23.1 0.1 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 28.0 5.7 26.8 6.2 23.1 0.1 0.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 37 3 58 15 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 125 23 180 67 0 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 850 652 1122 258
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 400 200
Base Capacity (vph) 332 3241 383 3261 1188 1266 1181
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.20 0.03 0.28 0.06 0.02 0.00
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1271 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build PM Peak Hour 2023 Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 511 112 18 616 205 73 20 94
v/c Ratio 0.02 0.44 0.19 0.09 0.49 0.51 0.17 0.08 0.35
Control Delay 37.8 20.5 4.9 36.8 18.4 30.9 18.2 33.0 27.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.8 20.5 4.9 36.8 18.4 30.9 18.2 33.0 27.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 70 0 6 86 63 12 6 20
Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 176 32 32 209 179 57 32 82
Internal Link Dist (ft) 652 785 4269 119
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 242 1895 912 274 2000 1128 1117 726 724 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.27 0.12 0.07 0.31 0.18 0.07 0.03 0.13 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1272 of 1447 ends

2023 Build+
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1273 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 206 384 135 172 244 355 243 1246 146 501 1150 145 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.65 0.34 0.58 0.29 0.81 0.66 0.74 0.25 0.92 0.59 0.22 Control Delay 57.7 44.6 8.2 55.2 37.4 33.1 54.8 34.6 6.6 67.5 28.1 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.7 44.6 8.2 55.2 37.4 33.1 54.8 34.6 6.6 67.5 28.1 5.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 72 127 0 59 52 104 83 280 4 178 236 2 Queue Length 95th (ft) 113 177 47 97 77 219 128 345 49 #289 294 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 327 720 453 318 1022 494 402 1687 593 545 1936 663 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.53 0.30 0.54 0.24 0.72 0.60 0.74 0.25 0.92 0.59 0.22 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1274 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 52 269 7 104 232 1478 85 1039 265 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.11 0.31 0.07 0.45 0.90 0.68 0.53 0.47 0.32 Control Delay 34.3 22.5 4.4 37.4 17.5 74.9 19.9 48.1 16.4 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.3 22.5 4.4 37.4 17.5 74.9 19.9 48.1 16.4 3.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 18 0 3 7 57 200 39 122 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 50 31 16 52 #136 291 #103 185 44 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1427 723 1395 938
Turn Bay Length (ft) 420 300 150 400 425 235
Base Capacity (vph) 957 1188 1847 106 694 257 2174 161 2219 840 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.04 0.15 0.07 0.15 0.90 0.68 0.53 0.47 0.32 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1275 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 19 1 30 30 102 10 1699 207 937 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.35 0.09 0.71 0.67 0.26 Control Delay 39.1 39.2 0.0 39.6 39.5 4.3 41.3 20.0 45.2 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.1 39.2 0.0 39.6 39.5 4.3 41.3 20.0 45.2 6.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 10 0 15 15 0 5 273 106 67
Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 33 0 44 44 9 22 360 #217 135
Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 855 2083 1722
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 140 140 250 245
Base Capacity (vph) 450 455 542 395 398 497 108 2393 317 3548 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.21 0.09 0.71 0.65 0.26 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1276 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 24 7 14 1788 29 960
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.13 0.03 0.09 0.47 0.17 0.25
Control Delay 38.1 38.9 0.1 40.6 9.5 40.7 6.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 38.1 38.9 0.1 40.6 9.5 40.7 6.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 12 0 7 153 14 64
Queue Length 95th (ft) 58 37 0 27 310 44 135
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 347 1611 2083
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 215 240
Base Capacity (vph) 555 553 566 159 3770 182 3885
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.47 0.16 0.25
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1277 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 790 4 583 13 18 1
v/c Ratio 0.31 0.01 0.22 0.03 0.03 0.00
Control Delay 4.4 21.5 2.3 20.2 0.1 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.4 21.5 2.3 20.2 0.1 0.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 010100
Queue Length 95th (ft) 133 10 48 19 0 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 850 652 1122 258
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 200
Base Capacity (vph) 3023 433 3052 1502 1305 1347
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.01 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.00
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1278 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 390 224 19 391 147 91 15 39
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.30 0.32 0.19 0.05 0.12
Control Delay 28.4 13.0 3.6 31.7 19.3 26.5 22.2 31.1 19.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 28.4 13.0 3.6 31.7 19.3 26.5 22.2 31.1 19.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 44 0 7 66 50 25 5 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) 79 116 45 29 126 121 74 25 35
Internal Link Dist (ft) 652 785 4269 119
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 740 2016 1085 392 1663 1186 1204 874 839 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.19 0.21 0.05 0.24 0.12 0.08 0.02 0.05 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1279 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 356 159 284 533 658 340 1155 213 514 1521 187 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.46 0.30 0.71 0.39 1.09 0.98 0.79 0.36 0.91 0.86 0.29 Control Delay 74.9 41.9 2.4 60.8 35.6 90.5 97.3 44.2 5.3 71.0 42.5 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 74.9 41.9 2.4 60.8 35.6 90.5 97.3 44.2 5.3 71.0 42.5 6.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 126 0 109 121 ~433 137 302 0 203 399 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) #124 175 12 156 157 #666 #233 360 50 #300 464 56 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 236 779 530 441 1356 603 347 1457 598 569 1762 643 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.46 0.30 0.64 0.39 1.09 0.98 0.79 0.36 0.90 0.86 0.29 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1280 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
2: Sunrise Blvd & International Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 323 24 198 27 127 414 1292 43 1634 311 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.05 0.23 0.24 0.56 1.06 0.52 0.29 0.79 0.40 Control Delay 42.8 27.8 5.2 48.6 24.7 103.3 19.0 46.1 28.2 7.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.8 27.8 5.2 48.6 24.7 103.3 19.0 46.1 28.2 7.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 91 10 0 15 20 ~136 195 24 294 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 32 29 45 77 #261 304 60 420 98 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1427 723 1395 938
Turn Bay Length (ft) 420 300 150 400 425 235
Base Capacity (vph) 764 914 1447 117 586 391 2496 259 2062 777 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.03 0.14 0.23 0.22 1.06 0.52 0.17 0.79 0.40 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1281 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
3: Sunrise Blvd & Fitzgerald Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 66 15 97 98 265 14 1196 133 1718 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.05 0.48 0.48 0.73 0.14 0.50 0.65 0.56 Control Delay 51.8 51.9 0.3 49.8 49.9 25.2 53.1 19.9 59.2 15.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 51.8 51.9 0.3 49.8 49.9 25.2 53.1 19.9 59.2 15.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 43 0 63 64 41 9 188 83 202
Queue Length 95th (ft) 91 93 0 121 123 131 32 281 #181 402 Internal Link Dist (ft) 376 855 2083 1722
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 140 140 250 245
Base Capacity (vph) 368 373 461 335 337 469 98 2543 232 3041 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.57 0.14 0.47 0.57 0.56 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1282 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
4: Sunrise Blvd & Mechanical Dr 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 43 56 9 10 921 37 1906
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.12 0.33 0.03 0.09 0.35 0.29 0.67
Control Delay 46.3 0.7 44.5 0.2 45.0 15.4 48.6 16.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.3 0.7 44.5 0.2 45.0 15.4 48.6 16.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 0 29 0 5 123 19 252
Queue Length 95th (ft) 189 0 74 0 24 180 58 453
Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 347 1611 2083
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 215 240
Base Capacity (vph) 385 438 384 438 116 2862 129 2908
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.10 0.15 0.02 0.09 0.32 0.29 0.66 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1283 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
5: Gold Valley Dr & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 669 13 994 68 23 5
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.30 0.05 0.44 0.26 0.04 0.01
Control Delay 32.7 6.2 31.3 7.1 28.5 0.2 0.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.7 6.2 31.3 7.1 28.5 0.2 0.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 41 4 70 18 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 132 25 210 76 0 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 850 652 1122 258
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 400 200
Base Capacity (vph) 271 3093 312 3109 951 1151 1066
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.22 0.04 0.32 0.07 0.02 0.00
Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1284 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
6: Fitzgerald Rd & White Rock Rd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 520 126 18 652 265 73 20 94
v/c Ratio 0.02 0.46 0.21 0.10 0.53 0.58 0.16 0.09 0.37
Control Delay 40.5 22.4 6.0 39.6 20.7 32.1 17.6 35.5 29.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 40.5 22.4 6.0 39.6 20.7 32.1 17.6 35.5 29.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 78 0 6 102 89 13 7 22
Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 196 41 33 244 231 56 34 86
Internal Link Dist (ft) 652 785 4269 119
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 223 1701 852 253 1813 1069 1060 671 671 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.31 0.15 0.07 0.36 0.25 0.07 0.03 0.14 Intersection Summary
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1285 of 1447 ends

2023 Build+
White Rock Road at Sunrise Boulevard with Revised
Westbound Lane Striping
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1286 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned 2023 Build+ AM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned Synchro 11 Report NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 206 384 135 172 244 355 243 1246 146 501 1150 145 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.66 0.31 0.60 0.42 0.46 0.64 0.79 0.24 0.81 0.60 0.22 Control Delay 60.7 44.7 3.2 56.1 39.4 5.8 52.6 37.5 2.7 52.4 28.0 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.7 44.7 3.2 56.1 39.4 5.8 52.6 37.5 2.7 52.4 28.0 5.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 127 0 59 77 0 82 288 0 168 229 2 Queue Length 95th (ft) #125 178 15 97 115 40 127 361 22 #236 294 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 302 726 497 302 726 887 436 1581 601 684 1936 663 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.53 0.27 0.57 0.34 0.40 0.56 0.79 0.24 0.73 0.59 0.22 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1287 of 1447 ends

Queues Project Sunrise (Revised)
1: White Rock Rd & Sunrise Blvd 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned 2023 Build+ PM Peak Hour WB T Reassigned Synchro 11 Report NV5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 356 159 284 533 658 340 1155 213 514 1521 187 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.53 0.35 0.78 0.70 0.67 0.78 0.73 0.35 0.84 0.83 0.30 Control Delay 63.4 45.7 6.7 66.6 48.0 14.9 63.1 39.8 8.2 59.6 39.5 11.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.4 45.7 6.7 66.6 48.0 14.9 63.1 39.8 8.2 59.6 39.5 11.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 131 0 111 201 67 131 295 14 196 393 31 Queue Length 95th (ft) 108 181 45 #169 265 142 184 350 74 259 457 86 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1394 850 927 1359
Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 700 275 185 385 190 380 175
Base Capacity (vph) 295 676 450 380 761 979 464 1581 603 662 1829 630 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.53 0.35 0.75 0.70 0.67 0.73 0.73 0.35 0.78 0.83 0.30 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1288 of 1447 ends

Local Transportation Analysis for
Rancho Cordova, CA Receiving Center

Appendix H – Driveway Volumes during the Site’s Peak Hour and Synchro Analysis Reports
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1289 of 1447 ends

2023 Site Driveway Traffic Volumes During Site Peak Hours Site Traffic
Approved Development
+Site Traffic
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1290 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC
11: Driveway 1/Sarapiqui Way & International Dr 2023 with Project AM Site Peak 2023 with Project AM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 201 8 0 44 24 0
Future Vol, veh/h 201 8 0 44 24 0
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 022022
Mvmt Flow 201 8 0 44 24 0
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 8.6 7 7.8

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 96% 100%
Vol Thru, % 0% 0% 0%
Vol Right, % 100% 4% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 44 209 24
LT Vol 0 201 24
Through Vol 0 0 0
RT Vol 44 8 0
Lane Flow Rate 44 209 24
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.046 0.243 0.031
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.804 4.186 4.657
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 947 857 773
Service Time 1.805 2.219 2.658
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.244 0.031
HCM Control Delay 7 8.6 7.8
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1291 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
12: Driveway 2 & International Dr 2023 with Project AM Site Peak 2023 with Project AM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 0 0 209 0 44
Future Vol, veh/h 68 0 0 209 0 44
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22022
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22220
Mvmt Flow 68 0 0 209 0 44
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 72
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 996
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 992
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.8

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 992 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1292 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
13: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 3 2023 with Project AM Site Peak 2023 with Project AM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 19 0 8 175 151
Future Vol, veh/h 0 19 0 8 175 151
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 19 0 8 175 151
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 167 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 854 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 851 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 851 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.022 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1293 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
14: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 4 2023 with Project AM Site Peak 2023 with Project AM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 19 0 8 43 151
Future Vol, veh/h 0 19 0 8 43 151
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 19 0 8 43 151
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 101 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 941 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 937 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 937 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.02 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1294 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
15: Industrial Driveway/Driveway 5 & Gold Dredege Way 2023 with Project AM Site Peak 2023 with Project AM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 8 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
Future Vol, veh/h 0 8 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 20222222220
Mvmt Flow 0 8 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 12 - - 64
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - ------- 6.22 - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----------
Follow-up Hdwy - ------- 3.318 - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 1069 0 0 1006
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - ------- 1065 - - 1004
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 8.8

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) ---- 1004
HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---- 0.048
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 8.8
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - - 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1295 of 1447 ends

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
16: Gold Dredge Way & Driveway 6 2023 with Project AM Site Peak 2023 with Project AM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 51 8 110 0 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 51 8 110 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly flow rate (vph) 51 8 110 0 0 0
Pedestrians 2 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 112 224 114
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 112 224 114
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 97 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1490 737 937
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 59 110
Volume Left 51 0
Volume Right 0 0
cSH 1490 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0
Control Delay (s) 6.5 0.0
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 6.5 0.0
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1296 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th AWSC
11: Driveway 1/Sarapiqui Way & International Dr 2023 with Project PM Site Peak 2023 with Project PM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 79 27 0 136 16 0
Future Vol, veh/h 79 27 0 136 16 0
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles, % 022022
Mvmt Flow 79 27 0 136 16 0
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.1 7.6

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 75% 100%
Vol Thru, % 0% 0% 0%
Vol Right, % 100% 25% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 136 106 16
LT Vol 0 79 16
Through Vol 0 0 0
RT Vol 136 27 0
Lane Flow Rate 136 106 16
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.132 0.122 0.02
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.496 4.159 4.426
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 1015 861 802
Service Time 1.557 2.191 2.492
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.134 0.123 0.02
HCM Control Delay 7.1 7.8 7.6
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.4 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1297 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
12: Driveway 2 & International Dr 2023 with Project PM Site Peak 2023 with Project PM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 152 0 0 106 0 136
Future Vol, veh/h 152 0 0 106 0 136
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22022
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22220
Mvmt Flow 152 0 0 106 0 136
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 156
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 895
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 892
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.8

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 892 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.152 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1298 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
13: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 3 2023 with Project PM Site Peak 2023 with Project PM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 58 0 34 79 59
Future Vol, veh/h 0 58 0 34 79 59
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 58 0 34 79 59
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 73 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 981 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 977 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 977 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.059 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - -
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1299 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
14: Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Driveway 4 2023 with Project PM Site Peak 2023 with Project PM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 58 0 34 78 59
Future Vol, veh/h 0 58 0 34 78 59
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 02220
Mvmt Flow 0 58 0 34 78 59
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 73 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - 6.9 ----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 ----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 981 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 977 ----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

Page 1300 of 1447 ends

HCM 6th TWSC
15: Industrial Driveway/Driveway 5 & Gold Dredege Way 2023 with Project PM Site Peak 2023 with Project PM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 34 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
Future Vol, veh/h 0 34 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 02202202202
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 20222222220
Mvmt Flow 0 34 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 38 - - 138
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - ------- 6.22 - - 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----------
Follow-up Hdwy - ------- 3.318 - - 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 1034 0 0 916
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - ------- 1030 - - 914
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 9

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - - - 914
HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---- 0.02
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 9
HCM Lane LOS A - - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - - 0.1
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1301 of 1447 ends

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
16: Gold Dredge Way & Driveway 6 2023 with Project PM Site Peak 2023 with Project PM Site Peak Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 18 34 154 0 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 18 34 154 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 34 154 0 0 0
Pedestrians 2 2 2
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 0 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 156 228 158
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 156 228 158
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1436 749 886
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 52 154
Volume Left 18 0
Volume Right 0 0
cSH 1436 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.09
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0
Control Delay (s) 2.7 0.0
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 2.7 0.0
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 11

Page 1302 of 1447 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 12.1.

DATE: March 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Steve Harriman, Public Works Division Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would adopt the Urban Forest Master Plan as a policy guidance reference document for the future maintenance, development and improvement of the urban forest in Rancho Cordova.

BACKGROUND
In 2019, the City was awarded an Urban and Community Forestry Proposition 68 Grant from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire). The grant funds are intended to mitigate climate change through the implementation of tree planting projects, with a focus on planting in low income and under-canopied neighborhoods. The grant award from CalFire was in the amount of $369,500 and included funds for the preparation of the UFMP, additional staff resources from the Sacramento Tree Foundation to assist with community outreach and engagement, and the planting of 750 trees during the grant term.

The primary objective of the UFMP is to provide a third-party analysis of the City’s Urban Forest Program, including an evaluation of the current condition of the urban forest and identification of opportunities for improvement. The document includes a Strategic Plan with specific recommendations for implementation in the coming years.

The development of the UFMP included significant community outreach and engagement to measure values and priorities related to the future management of the urban forest. The outreach included an on-line survey for residents and businesses, two virtual townhall meetings, and stakeholder interviews with City Council members and representatives from the Cordova Recreation and Park District, Folsom Cordova Unified School District, SMUD, Sacramento Tree Foundation, Volunteers in Neighborhood Services, and City staff from the Public Works and Community Development Departments.

A key finding is the current tree canopy cover ratio in Rancho Cordova is 6%, which includes

Page 1303 of 1447 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
both developed neighborhoods and areas slated for future development with relatively low canopy cover. The plan recommends a 20% canopy ratio goal for Rancho Cordova and includes a series of recommended actions in the coming years to realize the 20% canopy goal.

The UFMP also focuses on strategies for new development, which is generally higher density with smaller planting spaces for medium and large stature trees compared to older neighborhoods. The plan highlights the importance of careful species selection in high-density new neighborhoods to maintain the health of the trees and protect sidewalks, curbs, driveways, and underground infrastructure from root damage. The plan also highlights the advantages of medium and large stature trees in new developments, including larger tree canopies that provide cleaner air and shaded streets, sidewalks, and houses.

With a focus on climate change, the plan recommends the City continually update the approved tree species list to provide “climate ready trees” for changing climate conditions in the coming decades. Finally, the plan urges the City to pursue planting projects in large open spaces like parks and stormwater basins to allow the planting of medium and large stature trees to allow the City to meet the 20% canopy goal.

Adoption of the resolution fulfills the requirements of the CalFire grant and provides recommendations to City staff and the community to protect, maintain and enhance the urban forest in Rancho Cordova.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
This project has no impact on the General Fund.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Urban Forest Master Plan

3. UFMP Council Presentation Final 3 21 22 PDF

Page 1304 of 1447 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN AS A POLICY

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR THE PROTECTION, MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF RANCHO CORDOVA’S URBAN FOREST
WHEREAS, in 2019, the City was awarded an Urban and Community Forestry Proposition 68 Grant from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; and WHEREAS, the grant award of $369,500 includes funds for Sacramento Tree Foundation staff to assist with community outreach and engagement, the planting 750 trees with a focus on low income and under-canopied neighborhoods, and the preparation of the Urban Forest Master Plan (“UFMP”); and
WHEREAS, the City hired Dudek through a competitive procurement process to prepare the City’s UFMP; and
WHEREAS, the development of the UFMP incorporated significant public outreach and engagement, including an on-line survey, two virtual townhall meetings, and stakeholder interviews with City Councilmembers, partner organizations and community leaders; and WHEREAS, the UFMP provides a third party analysis of the City’s Urban Forest Program to establish long term goals and identify opportunities for improvement; and WHEREAS, the study determined the current canopy cover ratio in Rancho Cordova is 6% and establishes a long-term goal of 20%; and
WHEREAS, the plan recommends the City continually update the approved tree species list to provide “climate ready trees” for changing climate conditions in the coming decades; and WHEREAS, the plan also recommends the City pursue planting of medium and large stature trees in parks and stormwater basins and channels to assist in meeting the 20% canopy goal.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does adopt the Urban Forest Master Plan as a policy guidance document for the protection, maintenance and enhancement of the City’s Urban Forest and directs staff to amend Chapter 19 of the City’s Municipal Code to add a reference to the plan as a policy guidance document.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 21st day of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Page 1305 of 1447 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Donald Terry, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 1306 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA

URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN
Prepared by
FEBRUARY 2022
Technical Review by
Urban Forest Innovations
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1307 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 3
Working in partnership as community members, stakeholders and the City, we will improve public health, access to nature, and environmental equity for all of Rancho Cordova through sustainable management of the urban forest.

VISION
VISION
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1308 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
VISION........................................................................................................ 2 PART 1 - URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN
HISTORICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT................12
STATUS OF THE URBAN FOREST...........................................16 Canopy Cover .............................................................................................17 Environmental Services/Economic Benefit...............................21 Species Diversity .....................................................................................24 DBH / Age Distribution........................................................................26 Height Distribution .................................................................................28 Tree Condition ..........................................................................................28 Relative Performance Index & Summary ...................................29 Importance Values Summary ...........................................................30 Tree Management & Maintenance..................................................30 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT......................................................32 Public Survey .............................................................................................34 Community Meetings ............................................................................34

WHY THE CITY NEEDS AN URBAN FOREST
MASTER PLAN.......................................................................................38 Biotic Threats..............................................................................................41 Abiotic Threats ..........................................................................................41 URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES........45
Urban Forest Sustainability ...............................................................46 Tree Management & Maintenance..................................................48 Growing the Urban Forest..................................................................50 Development & Urban Forest Protection ..................................53 Community Engagement & Partnerships ..................................54 STRATEGIC PLAN...............................................................................57 Urban Forest Sustainability ...............................................................59 Tree Management & Maintenance................................................. 60 Growing the Urban Forest..................................................................63 Development & Urban Forest Protection ..................................65 Community Engagement & Partnerships ..................................68

FIGURES
Figure 1 Canopy Cover...........................................................................18 Figure 2 Developed Area Land Cover Distribution...............19 Figure 3 Trees Help Capture Carbon.............................................21 Figure 4 Age Distribution of the Rancho Cordova Tree
Inventory.......................................................................................................26 Figure 5 Benefits of Trees.................................................................. 40 Figure 6 Planning for Trees................................................................43 TABLES
Table 1 Canopy Cover and Land Cover Assessment.............17 Table 2 Number of Trees Needed to Increase
Canopy Cover ............................................................................................20 ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1309 of 1447 ends

6 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 3 Annual Environmental Services
Provided by Rancho Cordova’s Tree Inventory......................20 Table 4 Financial Value of Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory.............................................................................................21 Table 5 Top 10 Families in Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory............................................................................................23 Table 6 Height Distribution of Rancho Cordova’s Public
Tree Inventory............................................................................................28 Table 7 Tree Condition of Rancho Cordova’s Public Tree
Inventory.......................................................................................................28 Table 8 Relative Performance Index of the Top 10 Species in Rancho Cordova’s Inventory........................................................29 Table 9 Importance Values of the Top 10 Tree
Species in the Rancho Cordova Inventory................................30 Table 10 Community Engagement Emerging Themes.......35
PART 2 - TECHNICAL ASSESMENT

DEVELOPING THE RANCHO CORDOVA
URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN.............................................73 Working Group Meetings....................................................................74 Stakeholder Interviews.........................................................................74 Community Engagement....................................................................75 Urban Forest Management Practices...........................................75 Status of the Urban Forest.................................................................76 CHAPTER 1: URBAN FOREST SUSTAINABILITY ........78

1.1 Defining Urban Forest Sustainability......................................79

1.2 Tree Inventory Analysis ................................................................ 80

1.2.1 Urban Forest Services & Benefits..................................... 80

1.2.1.1 Environmental Services & Benefits ........................... 80

1.2.1.2 Economic Value....................................................................83

1.2.1.3 Species Diversity.................................................................84

1.2.1.4 Age Distribution ..................................................................88

1.2.1.5 Tree Condition ......................................................................94

1.2.1.6 Importance Value................................................................97 Chapter 1 Recommendations............................................................99 CHAPTER 2: TREE MANAGEMENT &
MAINTENANCE...................................................................................100

2.1 Urban Forest Governance...........................................................101

2.1.1 Public Works Department ....................................................101

2.1.2 Community Members............................................................102

2.1.3 Analysis & Strategic Directions .......................................102

2.2 Urban Forest Program Resources........................................102

2.2.1 Urban Forest Program Funding......................................102

2.2.1.1 Measure H/Community Enhancement Fund .....102

2.2.1.2 General Fund......................................................................103

2.2.1.3 Grant Funding....................................................................103

2.2.1.4 Other Funding Sources ................................................103

2.2.2 Analysis and Strategic Directions.................................103

2.3 Urban Forest Maintenance.......................................................109

2.3.1 Overview ......................................................................................109

2.3.2 Current Status...........................................................................110

2.3.2.1 Tree Establishment Care...............................................110

2.3.2.2 Tree Pruning..........................................................................111

2.3.2.3 Stump Removal ..................................................................111

2.3.2.4 Service Request and Emergency Response......111

2.3.2.5 Community Engagement in Urban Forest
Maintenance........................................................................................112

2.3.2.6 Tree Risk Management ..................................................113

2.3.2.7 Pest, Disease, and Invasive Species
Management .......................................................................................113

2.3.3 Analysis and Strategic Directions...................................115

2.3.3.1 Tree Establishment Care................................................115

2.3.3.2 Tree Pruning ....................................................................... 118

2.3.3.3 Stump Removal ................................................................ 119

2.3.3.4 Service Request and Emergency Response.... 119

2.3.3.5 Community Engagement in Urban Forest
Maintenance......................................................................................120

2.3.3.6 Tree Risk Management..................................................121

2.3.3.7 Pest, Disease, and Invasive Species
Management ......................................................................................122 Chapter 2 Recommendations..........................................................125 CHAPTER 3: GROWING THE URBAN FOREST.......... 128

3.1 Canopy Cover ................................................................................... 129

3.2 Rancho Cordova’s Canopy Cover......................................... 129

3.2.1 Methodology.............................................................................. 129

3.2.2 Canopy Cover and Land Cover Assessment ............131

3.2.2.1 Factors That Impact Canopy Cover .......................132

3.2.3 Canopy Cover Equity...........................................................134

3.2.3.1 CalEnviroScreen................................................................ 135

3.2.3.2 Urban Heat Island........................................................... 139

3.2.4 Increasing Canopy Cover ..................................................141

3.2.5 Canopy Cover Opportunities and
Constraints ...........................................................................................143

3.2.5.1 Developed Area ...............................................................143

3.2.5.2 New Development ........................................................ 147

3.2.5.3 Stormwater Capture ....................................................149

3.2.5.4 Stormwater Detention Basins ................................150 Chapter 3 Recommendations...........................................................151 CHAPTER 4: DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN
FOREST PROTECTION..................................................................154

4.1 Development..................................................................................... 155

4.1.1 Community Specific Plans................................................... 155

4.1.2 Role of Community Development Department..... 158

4.1.3 Design Guidelines ................................................................... 159

4.1.4 Code Enforcement ................................................................. 163

4.2 Relationship to Other City Documents.............................164

4.2.1 Rancho Cordova General Plan.........................................164

4.2.2 Pedestrian Master Plan & Bicycle Master Plan ......170

4.2.3 Rancho Cordova Municipal Code ..................................172

4.3 Urban Forest Protection – Tree Preservation
Ordinance....................................................................................................172

4.3.1 Definitions ................................................................................... 174

4.3.2 Application Procedure and Decision Criteria .........175

4.3.3 Emergency Conditions ....................................................... 176

4.3.4 Tree Replacement Plan ...................................................... 176

4.3.5 Activity Allowed Near Protected Trees......................177

4.3.6 Tree Protection Measures ................................................ 178 ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1310 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.3.7 Effectiveness of the Ordinance ................................... 179 Chapter 4 Recommendations ......................................................... 181 CHAPTER 5: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND
PARTNERSHIPS ..................................................................................184

5.1 Community Engagement ........................................................... 185

5.1.1 Equity and Inclusion................................................................ 185

5.1.1.1 Barriers to Equity................................................................186

5.1.2 Public Feedback Results ..................................................... 187

5.1.2.1 Community Meetings...................................................... 187

5.1.2.2 Online Survey.....................................................................189

5.1.2.3 Community Values and Concerns ..........................189

5.2 City Partnerships............................................................................. 191

5.2.1 Sacramento Tree Foundation........................................... 192

5.2.1.2 Neighborwoods Program............................................ 192

5.2.1.3 Sacramento Shade.......................................................... 193

5.2.1.4 City and SacTree Partnership................................... 193

5.2.2 Sacramento Municipal Utility District ......................... 195

5.2.3 Cordova Recreation and Parks District ..................... 197

5.2.3.1 City Partnership................................................................ 197

5.2.4 Folsom Cordova Unified School District ..................198

5.2.5 Partnership Expansion........................................................199 Chapter 5 Recommendations.....................................................201 CHAPTER 6: ACTION PLAN.....................................................204

6.1 Implementation Plan....................................................................205

6.2 Monitoring Plan .............................................................................208

FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Tree Benefits Increase with Size & Age .................81 Figure 1-2 Age Distribution of Rancho Cordova’s Top 10
Inventory Species....................................................................................92 Figure 3-1 Canopy Cover ...................................................................130 Figure 3-2 Canopy Cover Attributed to
Public and Private Trees .................................................................... 133 Figure 3-3 CalEnviroScreen Results by Census Tract........137 Figure 3-4 Urban Heat Island Effect...........................................140 Figure 3-5 Tree Inventory and Available
Planting Locations ................................................................................145 TABLES
Table 1-1 Annual Environmental Services
Provided by Rancho Cordova’s Tree Inventory......................82 Table 1-2 Financial Value of Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory............................................................................................83 Table 1-3 Top 10 Families in Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory............................................................................................85 Table 1-4 Top 10 Genera in Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory............................................................................................86 Table 1-5 Top 10 Species in Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory............................................................................................87 Table 1-6 Recommended Urban Forest
Distribution by DSH Measurements and Age......................... 90 Table 1-7 Age Distribution of Rancho Cordova’s
Tree Inventory........................................................................................... 90 Table 1-8 Height Distribution of Trees in the Inventory .....93 Table 1-9 Tree Inventory Condition Categories ......................94 Table 1-10 Condition of Tree Inventory........................................94 Table 1-11 Condition of Tree Inventory
by Age and Diameter at Standard Height (DSH)..................95 Table 1-12 Relative Performance Index of the
Top 10 Species in the City’s Inventory.........................................96 Table 1-13 Top 10 Importance Values of Tree
Species in Rancho Cordova...............................................................98 Table 2-1 CEF “Enhance the City’s Urban Forest”
Project Funding, by Fiscal Year and Outcomes...................102 Table 2-2 Comparison of Rancho Cordova
Urban Forestry Budget Relative to Comparable
Jurisdictions .............................................................................................106 Table 2-3 Forestry Budget ...............................................................107 Table 2-4 Tree Program Percent of Total Budget ...............107 Table 2-5 Total Municipal Budget.................................................108 Table 2-6 Average Budget Per Public Tree.............................108 Table 2-7 Forestry Budget Per Capita.......................................109 Table 2-8 Pruning Cycles in Select
California Jurisdictions.........................................................................117 Table 3-1 Canopy Cover and Land Cover Assessment .......131 Table 3-2 Comparison of Canopy Cover with
Other California Cities ........................................................................134 Table 3-3 CalEnviroScreen Score, Poverty Level,
and Canopy Cover by Census Tract............................................ 138 Table 3-4 Rancho Cordova Heat Health Index
Years 2011–2030..................................................................................... 142 Table 3-5 Total Number of Trees Needed to
Increase Canopy Cover ......................................................................144 Table 3-6 Total Number of Trees to Plant per
Year for 30 Years to Increase Canopy Cover.........................144 Table 3-7 Housing Units by Structure........................................146 Table 4-1 Tree Preservation-Related Goals,
Policies, and Action Items ................................................................166 Table 4-2 Development and Community
Character-Related Goals, Policies, and Action Items ....... 167 Table 4-3 Private Tree Maintenance-Related
Goals, Policies and Action Items................................................... 168 Table 4-4 Sustainability-Related Goals, Policies,
and Action Items ............................................................................168 Table 4-5 Municipal Code Policies Related to Trees...........173 Table 5-1 Zip Codes of Survey Respondents .........................190 Table 5-2 Demographics of Survey Respondents
Compared to Demographics of the City
of Rancho Cordova...............................................................................190 Table 6-1 Rancho Cordova’s Vibrant Cities Lab
Community Assessment and Goal Setting Scores............209 GLOSSARY........................................................................................ 228 REFERENCES..................................................................................232 8 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1311 of 1447 ends

PART 1:

URBAN FOREST

MASTER PLAN
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1312 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 13
The area where Rancho Cordova sits was originally the
Tribal lands of the Nisenan, Maidu, and Miwok peoples
(Native Land Digital 2015). In the twentieth century, due to escalating Cold War concerns, Mather Air Force Base
and Aerojet General Corporation were built in the area, which attracted a large workforce. These groups spurred the development of homes and other infrastructure
(Escalante 2019). Rancho Cordova’s history of serving as a regional employment center continues today, drawing
thousands to the City each day to work. In 2006, the
City established a General Plan to address the major
issue of an aging housing supply that did not meet the
needs of the commuting workforce and the desire for the development of a walkable community with a distinct
identity.

The area generally north and west of Sunrise Boulevard
contains most of the City’s urban footprint, existing
housing, and existing trees owned by both private
residents and the City itself. The area generally south and east of Sunrise Boulevard primarily consists of
undeveloped land and scattered industrial and rural
residential uses, with oak and cottonwood woodlands,
grasslands, vernal pool areas, and open water and
Historical and Environmental Context

HISTORICAL AND

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1313 of 1447 ends

14 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 15 rivers. The City’s riparian areas comprise the historically tree-abundant parts of the City. As the City continues
to grow and expand, Specific Plans have been created
for areas of new development to continue to address
a lack of affordable housing with proximity to jobs and services. In areas where high-density housing is important, communities have been designed to include compact and
small trees to accommodate more housing units. As a
tradeoff, parks and parklets incorporate trees in specific areas rather than on a house-by-house basis.

The City of Rancho Cordova officially incorporated on
July 1, 2003 to build and develop a City that reflects the values and priorities of the community and provide an
increased level of service to residents (Rancho Cordova 2021). Community leaders continue to assess the needs
of the community, and increasing city-wide canopy cover has emerged as a community priority. In 2015 the City
began an urban forest program led by the Department
of Public Works to implement programs and policies to
promote healthy trees, which now includes free trees for residential and commercial properties, stump removal, and community engagement and education programs. The City
was recognized for its exceptional efforts receiving a Tree City USA designation in 2016 and the Growing Greenprint award in 2017 from the Sacramento Tree Foundation,
and the Project of the Year Award for the Bear Hollow
Tree Planting Project from the American Public Works
Association in 2020.

While the City has been celebrated for its urban forest program, City staff recognized that continued expansion and appropriate maintenance of the urban forest happens beyond one department and extends into multiple
City departments, elected officials, and community
stakeholders. The City understands that the success of
the urban forest program is dependent on all stakeholders working toward a shared vision and goals. The City
decided to develop an urban forest master plan (UFMP)
to create a unifying vision and a long-term strategic plan to guide City decisions and management of the urban
forest. In 2018 the City was awarded a grant from the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to fund the development of the UFMP, as well as
supporting community engagement efforts to plant 750
trees in Rancho Cordova communities. The UFMP reflects
the commitment of City staff that began when it was
incorporated in 2003, to build a resilient and healthy city for current and future stakeholders of Rancho Cordova.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1314 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 17
Status of the Urban Forest

STATUS OF THE URBAN FOREST
Canopy Cover
Rancho Cordova has a total canopy cover of
approximately 6%. However, the majority of development
in the City is located in the northwestern portion of the City, while the southeastern portion remains largely
undeveloped. Therefore, the canopy cover in each portion of the City was separately analyzed to provide a more
accurate depiction of the City’s canopy cover and establish realistic canopy cover goals. As shown in Table 1, Rancho Cordova currently has a canopy cover of approximately
12% within its developed area footprint and a canopy
cover of approximately 1.4% in the undeveloped portion
of the City. As such, Rancho Cordova’s 12% canopy
cover represents the canopy cover where the majority of community members live and work. The City’s land cover
distribution is depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2 provides a breakdown of the land cover classes within the developed portion of the City.

Table 1: Canopy Cover and Land Cover Assessment
Land Cover Type Developed Land Cover Type Undeveloped
Acres % Cover Acres % Cover
Tree 1,186 11.7% Tree 166 1.4%
Grass/shrub 1,689 16.7% Grass/shrub 609 5.0%
Bare dirt 2,193 21.7% Bare dirt 10329 85.0%
Impervious surface 4,862 21.7% Impervious surface 1004 8.3% Water 171 1.7% Water 42 0.3%
Rancho Cordova has a
total canopy cover of
approximately 6%.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1315 of 1447 ends

18 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 19 80 50
50 16
5 MILES
Carmichael
Fair Oaks
Sloughhouse
RANCHO

CORDOVA

LAND COVER DISTRIBUTION

DEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED
City of Rancho Cordova
Developed/Undeveloped
Tree Canopy
Grass/Shrub
Bare Dirt
Water
Impervious Surface
FIGURE 1:

CANOPY COVER
Developed area
canopy cover: 12%
Undeveloped area
canopy cover: 1.4%
Status of the Urban Forest
Figure 2

DEVELOPED AREA

LAND COVER DISTRIBUTION
Grass/Shrub
Tree Canopy
Bare Dirt
Water
Impervious Surface

48.1%

1.7%

11.7%

16.7%

21.7%
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1316 of 1447 ends

20 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 21 The total number of trees needed, by canopy size, to
increase canopy cover in the developed portion of the City is provided in Table 2. For example, if the City elected to plant entirely 50-foot-diameter canopy trees, a total of 18,604 trees are needed to reach a 20% canopy cover.

Environmental Services/Economic Benefits
Trees provide a variety of environmental services and
benefits that can be classified into three primary categories:
environmental, social, and economic. The estimated annual environmental services provided by trees in the inventory are presented in Table 3 and the financial value of the inventoried trees is shown in Table 4. Figure 3 presents how trees help capture carbon and provides comparisons of the equivalent emissions.

Table 3: Benefits and Services Provided by Rancho Cordova’s Public Tree Inventory Service Annual Environmental
Benefit
Annual Environmental Impact Annual Economic
Value
Carbon Storage
(carbon held in tree)
832.3 tons The carbon stored in the City’s urban
forest is equivalent to the carbon
emitted from 659 cars driven for 1 year.
$141,951
Carbon Sequestration
(carbon removed
from air)

28.5 tons The carbon removed from the City’s
air by the urban forest is equivalent to
an average passenger vehicle driving
259,305 miles.
$4,870
Avoided Runoff 17 ft3 This benefit is the equivalent of 125 gallons of water per year.
$1,120
Air Pollution Removal 869.2 lbs/year Currently, 3.2 million people die worldwide annually from air pollution;
this number could rise to 6.2 million by
2050.
$980
Sources: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) and i-Tree Analysis (USFS 2020).

Figure 3: How Trees Capture Carbon

TREES HELP CAPTURE CARBON ONE TREE IN A COMMUNITY FOREST Trees in metropolitan areas and small towns in the U.S. are responsible for almost one-fifth of the country’s captured and stored carbon emissions.

They also shade buildings in the summer and block wind in the winter, which reduces the use of air conditioners and heaters—avoiding millions of tons of carbon emissions.

One tree can capture an
average of.062 metric
tons of carbon dioxide
(CO2) over its lifetime
That is equal to the
carbon emissions from
driving one car 1,500
miles
.062

METRIC TONS
1,500
MILES
Forest products, like
lumber and wood furniture, currently store more
than 100 million metric
tons of CO2
Soils hold 58% of the carbon in
community forests, which is more than
all the carbon stored in trees and
forest wood products combined.

That is equal to the
carbon emissions from
driving more than 21
million cars
for an entire year
100,000,000

METRIC TONS
21,000,000

CARS PER YEAR
Table 4: Financial Value of Rancho Cordova’s Tree Inventory Value Description Asset
Amount
Per-Tree
Value
Structural Tree replacement
cost
$7.13 Million $1,823
Functional Value based on
the services trees
perform
$6,970/year $1.78
Sources: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) and i-Tree Analysis (USFS 2020).

Status of the Urban Forest
Table 2: Number of Trees Needed to Increase Canopy Cover Total Canopy
Total Number of Trees by Canopy Spread
20 ft diameter 35 ft diameter 50 ft diameter 75 ft diameter Western redbud Callery pear Chinese pistache Interior live oak 14% 32,229 10,520 5,155 2,291
16% 60,255 19,667 9,638 4,282
18% 88,280 28,815 14,121 6,274
20% 116,306 37,963 18,604 8,266
25% 186,369 60,832 29,811 13,246
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1317 of 1447 ends

22 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 23 Species Diversity
Rancho Cordova’s
City managed tree
inventory consists of
3,910 trees, composed
of 28 families,
43 genera, and
76 species.

Table 5: Top 10 Families in Rancho Cordova’s Tree Inventory Family Diversity
Sustainability Goal: No Family Greater than 20% of Inventory Rank Genus Number of trees % of Inventory
1 Fagaceae 1269 32%
2 Lythraceae 705 18%
3 Anacardiaceae 616 16%
4 Platanaceae 424 11%
5 Ulmaceae 232 6%
6 Rosaceae 226 6%
7 Fabaceae 80 2%
8 Juglandaceae 64 2%
9 Pinaceae 42 1%
10 Sapindaceae 37 1%
Source: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (West Coast Arborists 2016) Status of the Urban Forest
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1318 of 1447 ends

24 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 25 Genus Diversity
TOP 10 Genera in Rancho Cordova’s Tree Inventory
Sustainability Goal: No Genus Greater than 10% of Inventory

1. Quercus 2. Lagerstroemia 3. Pistacia 4. Platanus 5. Zelkova

6. Pyrus 7. Sequoia 8. Prunus 9. Cercis 10. Juglans
32%
3%
18%
3%
13%
2%
11%
2%
5%
1%
Source: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) Species Diversity
TOP 10 Species in Rancho Cordova’s Tree Inventory
Sustainability Goal: No Species Greater than 5% of Inventory Source: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019)

1. Lagerstroemia indica
Crape myrtle

6. Zelkova serrata
Sawtooth zelkova
2 Pistacia chinensis
Chinese pistache

7. Quercus agrifolia
Coast live oak

3. Quercus lobata
Valley oak

8. Pyrus calleryana
Ornamental pear

4. Platanus X hispanica
London plane

9. Sequoia sempervirens
Coast redwood

5. Quercus wislizeni
Interior live oak

10. Quercus douglasii
Blue oak
18%
5%
13%
5%
12%
3%
11%
3%
9%
2%
Status of the Urban Forest
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1319 of 1447 ends

26 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 27 DBH/Age Distribution Summary
Figure 4 provides a breakdown of the age
distribution of the Rancho Cordova tree inventory.

Based on urban forestry research (Richards 1983),
there are more small stature, immature, and
young trees than are recommended to maintain a
sustainable urban forest. The City can expect trees’
environmental services to significantly increase
as the current tree population ages and tree size
increases. A continued investment in tree planting
and existing tree maintenance will be needed to
ensure a sustainable age distribution is retained.

Status of the Urban Forest
DBH/Age Distribution Summary
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Mature
Middle
Aged
Young
Immature
Recommended age distribution of trees.
25+ in
≤6 in
7-18 in
19-24 in
Age Distribution of
the Rancho Cordova
Tree Inventory
20%
9% 39%
32%
Figure 4

DBH / AGE DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1320 of 1447 ends

28 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 29 Height Distribution - The height distribution of Rancho Cordova’s tree inventory includes:

Tree Condition - The condition of Rancho Cordova’s tree inventory includes:

Relative Performance Index Summary
The relative performance index (RPI) identifies which
species are doing well and which many be having issues.

Trees with an RPI of 1 or higher are performing as well or better than the entire inventory.

Table 6: Height Distribution of Rancho Cordova’s Public Tree Inventory Height (feet) Size Classification Number of trees % of Inventory 0–15 Small 2,155 55%
16–30 Small 1,213 31%
31–45 Medium 330 8%
46–60 Large 160 4%
60+ Large 51 1%
Functional Value based on the services trees perform $6,970/year $1.78 Source: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) Table 7: Condition of Rancho Cordova’s Public Tree Inventory Condition Number of Trees Percent
Good 1,162 29.70%
Fair 2,659 68.00%
Poor 78 2.20%
Dead 4 0.10%
Total 3,910 100%
Source: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) Table 8: Relative Performance Index of the Top 10 Species in Rancho Cordova’s Inventory Relative Performance Index (RPI)
Goal: Top 6 Species Have an RPI Score of 1.0 or Higher
Rank Botanical name Common name RPI
City Inventory 0.3
1 Lagerstroemia indica Crape myrtle 0.7
2 Pistacia chinensis Chinese pistache 0.97
3 Quercus lobata Valley oak 2.13
4 Platanus X hispanica London plane 0.06
5 Quercus wislizeni Interior live oak 2
6 Zelkova serrata Sawtooth zelkova 0.67
7 Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak 0.13
8 Pyrus calleryana Ornamental pear 0.1
9 Sequoia sempervirens Coast redwood 0.07
10 Quercus douglasii Blue oak 0.5
Sources: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) and i-Tree Analysis (USFS 2020).

Status of the Urban Forest
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1321 of 1447 ends

30 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 31 Importance Values Summary
The importance value of tree species combines the
percentage of the species in the population of City-owned trees with its corresponding percentage of leaf area.

Tree Management and Maintenance

FUNDING
The City’s Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance and management of 3,910 City-owned trees.

In fiscal year 2019/2020, the City’s urban forestry program operating budget expenditure was approximately $329,000 (approximately $84 per tree or $4.50 per capita). Existing funding levels allow the City to meet basic urban forest maintenance obligations, such as grid pruning and service request and emergency response. However, the City’s
urban forestry budget is considerably smaller than the
average across comparably sized and nearby comparator
municipalities, as measured by several factors. Increasing urban forest resources would significantly enhance the
City’s capacity for effective urban forest maintenance, community outreach and engagement, and successful
pursuit of urban forest goals and objectives.

STAFF
The City has one 0.5 FTE contract arborist who is
responsible for supporting tree related tasks. The number of FTEs in Rancho Cordova is lower than the average
number for a city of Rancho Cordova’s size (Hauer and
Peterson 2016a), but is supplemented with contracted
crews to perform tree pruning, removal, and other
management activities.

Table 9: Importance Values of the Top 10 Tree Species in the Rancho Cordova Inventory Botanical name Common name Importance value
Platanus X hispanica London Plane 35.2
Quercus lobata Valley Oak 27.9
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 19.3
Quercus wislizenii Interior Live Oak 18.4
Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 17.6
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 13.9
Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova 9.2
Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood 8.3
Quercus ouglasii Blue Oak 6.4
Pyrus calleryana Ornamental Pear 4.8
Source: City of Rancho Cordova Tree Inventory (WCA 2019) and I-Tree (USFS 2020) Status of the Urban Forest
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1322 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 33
Community Engagement

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To understand the Rancho Cordova community’s
sentiments toward trees, and how these perceptions
affect the urban forest, several community engagement
activities were conducted. A UFMP that reflects the
community is more likely to be implemented upon
completion and will result in achieving the goals of the City urban forestry program. Community engagement
conducted for the UFMP included community meetings,
stakeholder interviews, a project webpage, an online
survey, an educational video, social media posts, and print flyers.

Over 97% of survey
respondents agreed
that trees are a valuable
asset to Rancho Cordova
that contributes to their
quality of life.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1323 of 1447 ends

34 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 35 Public Survey
An online survey was created to evaluate the public’s
perception and understanding of the City’s trees, and to offer a space for public feedback as the City developed the UFMP. The 20-question survey was open between
October 26, 2020, and February 7, 2021. A total of 236
survey responses were received.

Comments received during community meetings,
stakeholder interviews and survey responses were
analyzed to determine major community themes, values,
and priorities that were expressed for the City’s urban forest, as detailed in Table 10.

Community Meetings
Two online community meetings were held via zoom
on December 10 and 14, 2020 and were attended by 18
community members.

Table 10: Community Engagement Emerging Themes
Trees Valued
Survey respondents agree that trees are valuable assets to Rancho Cordova‘s quality of life.

The American River Parkway is highly valued by residents.

Trees are valued for providing habitat.

Large, healthy trees should be preserved.

Development
Many residents expressed concerns and a lack of trust regarding new development in the City and the need to include residents in the planning process.

Residents expressed concerns related to tree-infrastructure conflicts.

Residents disliked that trees are being removed for new development.

Tree Management/Maintenance
Residents expressed concerns regarding nesting birds and tree maintenance activities.

City tree pruning of private property trees could help encourage trees on private property.

Tree Policies Desire for tree policies and protections that are equitably enforced for developers, residents, and especially new development.

Areas Lacking Trees
High density housing areas lack large trees.

Lower income areas.

New development.

Public transit stations, bus stops, residential corridors.

Community
Education/Outreach
Residents expressed a desire for more education and support related to the urban forest, incentives for tree planting, free tree programs, establishment care, watering, maintenance and care.

More community events and volunteer opportunities are desired.

Tree planting events and efforts present opportunities for job-training and internships.

Community Engagement
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1324 of 1447 ends

36 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 37 Table 10: Community Engagement Emerging Themes, continued.

Canopy Cover Residents desire to preserve existing canopy cover.

Preserving and increasing canopy cover will depend on single-family homeowners.

Species Diversity
Desire for native trees.

Residents appreciate the native trees along the American River Parkway and would like to see more native trees in this area that provide wildlife habitat and shade.

Community Engagement
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1325 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 39
“Urban forest” is a term used to describe the collection of trees found within the built environment. An urban forest is distinguished by its existence among paved surfaces, buildings, parks, and a large human population. Rancho
Cordova’s urban forest is primarily human-created—the
result of tree planting and greening activities carried out by people—rather than a native forest ecosystem. The
City’s urban forest requires regular maintenance to keep roads, sidewalks, and parks clear and safe, as well as to maintain the health of the trees. The concept of an urban forest challenges us to think holistically about trees found within the City and how to manage this natural resource for the benefits that create enjoyment for present and
future generations. Figure 5 displays just a few of the many different services and benefits of an urban forest.

Rancho Cordova’s urban forest will face threats from
abiotic and biotic factors as it grows over time. Abiotic factors are those that are the result of nonliving conditions or processes such as climate change, development, lack of community awareness or understanding, and unfavorable
growing conditions. Biotic factors are the result of living organisms that cause issues in trees, such as pathogens or pests.

The difference between abiotic and biotic factors is an important distinction when considering the management
strategies needed to improve tree health. A tree suffering from lack of water due to ongoing drought conditions
may need to be examined more closely and replaced with
a new tree species that has lower water requirements to help the urban forest adapt to climate change. Similarly, an oak tree infected by the pathogen that causes sudden oak death, Phytophthora ramorum, will require certain
management actions to help prevent the spread of the
pathogen to more trees.

WHY THE CITY NEEDS AN URBAN

FOREST MASTER PLAN
Why the City Needs an Urban Forest Master Plan
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1326 of 1447 ends

40 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 41 TREES CLEANER AIR 100 trees remove 53
tons of carbon dioxide
and 430 pounds of other
air pollutants per year.

The Benefits of

COMBATS

CLIMATE CHANGE
By reducing energy demand
and absorbing carbon dioxide,
trees and vegetation decrease
the production and negative
effects of air pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions.

CAPTURES
RAINWATER 100 mature trees can
capture and store
about 139,000 gallons
of rainwater per year.

CLEANER
WATER A medium-sized tree
intercepts up to 2,300
gallons of stormwater
runoff per year.

INCREASES
BUSINESS Shoppers will spend 9%
to 12% more for goods
and services in business
districts with a high quality
tree canopy.

REDUCES

URBAN HEAT

ISLAND EFFECT
Shaded surfaces may be
20–45°F cooler than the
peak temperatures of
unshaded areas.

IMPROVES PUBLIC HEALTH
People are less likely to be hospitalized for athsma
when they live in neighborhoods with many trees.

SAVES ENERGY
Strategically placed
shade trees can help
save up to 56% on
annual air-conditioning
costs for homes and
businesses.

IMPROVES MENTAL HEALTH
People living in neighborhoods with less than 10%
tree canopy are more likely to report symptoms of
depression, stress and anxiety.

GREEN

ECONOMY
In 2009, urban forestry
supported 60,067 jobs in
California resulting in $3.3
billion individual income.

CO2

REMOVED
equals

RESILIENT

COMMUNITIES
139K

RAINWATER
equals

HEALTHIER
PEOPLE
COOLER

SURFACE
equals

SUSTAINABLE
LIVING
$3.3

BILLION
equals

ECONOMIC
VALUE
Biotic Threats

INVASIVE PESTS AND DISEASES
California acquires a new invasive species approximately every 40 days (Hoddle 2021), and the Sacramento
region has been identified by the California
Department of Food and Agriculture as one of
the top 5 regions at risk for the establishment of
invasive pests and diseases.

These new threats have the potential to cause billions
of dollars in damages to urban forests, wildlands, and
agricultural settings, and pose a real risk to urban forest sustainability and environmental benefits if a particular tree species is severely infested.

One of the most important factors of a pest management
program is frequent monitoring for signs and symptoms of disease development or pest infestations. Early detections of plant health problems will provide the City with the best chance to sustain a healthy urban forest canopy
for the future. For specific pests and diseases that have either been documented and are actively managed in
Rancho Cordova, or ones have the potential to establish in the area, see Chapter 2.3.3.7: Pest, Disease, and Invasive Species Management.

Abiotic Threats

CLIMATE CHANGE
Climate change is predicted to cause substantial negative impacts to commonly planted street tree species in
California (McBride and Lacan 2018). Over the past
century, average maximum temperatures in
California have increased between 1.6°F to 2.5°F
and these temperatures are expected to continue to rise over the coming years. In the San Joaquin-Sacramento
Basin, increases in frequency, length, and intensity of heatwaves are projected (Cayan et. al. 2009). Conditions of wet and dry seasons are expected to become more
extreme, with longer more intense periods of drought and heavier periods of precipitation with increased flooding (Swain et al. 2018). Finding additional irrigation water or funding for irrigation improvements for street trees will present a challenge (McBride and Lacan 2018). Due
to these predicted weather and climate changes, the
City will need to critically reexamine its street tree
palette and plan for a hotter, drier future as five of
its most common street tree species may be as risk.

Figure 5 The Benefits of Trees
Why the City Needs an Urban Forest Master Plan
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1327 of 1447 ends

42 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 43 This topic is discussed in greater detail in Chapter 1: Urban Forest Sustainability.

IMPROPER TREE MAINTENANCE
While the City owns and maintains thousands of trees,
the majority of Rancho Cordova’s urban forest
consists of private trees on single-family residential lots, apartment complexes, parking lots, and commercial lands.

The City’s tree ordinance requires permits for removal
or tree maintenance of native oak species and any tree
with a trunk diameter of 24 inches or greater. However, residents are not always aware of protected tree and
permit requirements and might unknowingly violate the
ordinance. Further, not all residents know that trees need establishment care and supplemental water during their
first years, and excessive pruning or absence of pruning can lead to health problems or future tree death. The lack of tree knowledge amongst Rancho Cordova residents is
also a common issue for other municipal urban forestry
programs.

DEVELOPMENT
Planning that does not incorporate space for mature
trees is a threat to the success of the urban forest. It is also avoidable, as many of the 25,000 housing units
planned for development are yet to be built, and the
opportunity exists to prioritize space for medium
to large-size trees that provide environmental,
economic, and public health benefits.

Figure 6 presents how varying parkway widths affect
the ability to plant large shade trees. Planning for trees in advance by providing for parkways that are suitable
for large trees can ultimately determine the return on
investment. The benefits and services provided by trees is directly related to tree size and age. Issues related to development of existing and new areas in the City are
further discussed in Chapter 4: Development and Urban
Forest Protection.

Why the City Needs an Urban Forest Master Plan
50’
40’
Less Shade
More Shade
Most Shade
30’
20’
10’
5’ Wide 8’ Wide 10’ Wide
Large Tree
50’+
Parkway widths determine tree size and species that can be planted Shade and cooling properties
vary based on tree size and species
Sun is at its strongest
Small Tree
20’-35’
Medium Tree
35’-50’
10 AM 2 PM
Figure 6 Planning for Trees
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1328 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 45

URBAN FOREST

MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
Urban Forest Management Challenges
The urban forest management challenges in this section
represent overarching themes that pertain to the five
focus areas of the UFMP. Each finding is discussed further in the appropriate chapter and supported by the various methods used to analyze the Rancho Cordova urban forest program.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1329 of 1447 ends

46 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 47 1 2
3 FOCUS #1: URBAN FOREST SUSTAINABILITY Urban Forest Management Challenges City managed trees are young/
immature and not yet providing a
high level of environmental services:

The environmental services provided by trees
increase as they mature and grow larger.

Approximately 93% of City managed trees are
considered immature (54%) and young (39%),
and 86% of trees are small stature measuring
less than 30 feet in height. The age and height
distribution largely reflect a recent increase in
tree planting activities since the City began its
urban forest program as oppose to managing
small stature species.

The City managed tree inventory
needs increased diversity to be
resilient to multiple emerging
threats:

Species diversity within an urban forest is
an important sustainability indicator that
helps to determine how vulnerable the tree
population is to potential threats like pests,
diseases, drought, and extreme heat. In Rancho
Cordova’s City managed tree inventory, the top
5 most common species total 63% of the total
inventory. If an unknown threat caused decline
of one or more of these species the City could
potentially lose a significant portion of its tree
inventory.

Parks, open space, and recreation are
a valued community asset:

The City of Rancho Cordova is a unique
community that has abundant access to
walking trails, the American River, and other
natural recreation areas while being located
within the urban Sacramento County region.

This unique landscape is a valued asset for
residents and is a significant opportunity
to implement tree planting projects with
multiple health and quality of life benefits.

In the developing areas of the City, new
residential communities are being built
adjacent to large stormwater basins that may
provide an opportunity to plant trees while
reducing stormwater management costs of
the City, creating shaded walking paths, and
providing habitat for local wildlife. The Bear
Hollow Stormwater Basin project completed
in 2018/2019, which included the planting of
500 native trees, provides a replicable model
for other stormwater basin tree planting
projects in the City. Identifying these planting
opportunities and developing a planting
strategy that includes maintenance for the
first three years after the trees are planted, will
allow the City to anticipate future budget needs
and apply for grant funding to support project
implementation. The developed footprint of the
City has an extensive network of walking trails
and parks that are an important component of
promoting a healthy and active lifestyle. They
also provide avenues for residents to safely
travel by bike or walking to places they work,
shop, and recreate. With increasing annual
temperatures brought on by climate change,
providing healthy and extensive tree canopy
cover that shades these areas is important
strategy to ensure residents can continue to
use trails and recreation areas during extreme
heat events.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1330 of 1447 ends

48 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 49 FOCUS #2: TREE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE Urban Forest Management Challenges 1 2 Stump removal program provides a framework for the city to expand other urban forest services to private property:

The City stump removal program will send an arborist crew to a residential property to remove tree stumps from front yards and then replace it with a free shade tree. This is a unique municipal program that uses general fund dollars to improve the aesthetic appeal and value of private properties. This program can serve as a model to further develop urban forest services that help private properties with a resource to develop mature, healthy, and safe trees in front yards of residential properties. The specific services should be determined by further engagement efforts could include tree pruning, tree planting, or installing low water use irrigation for tree establishment.

Better Coordination is Needed Between City Staff:

While City staff appear willing and eager to work together to achieve goals for the UF, there seems to be a lack of effective coordination/cooperation (i.e., ‘silos’) between departments so that they are not necessarily aware of what each other is doing that may directly influence the urban forest. Improving coordination will take direct staff input as to what processes and practices can be improved to enhance coordination around urban forest related issues, with a focus on addressing urban forest issues early on in any process (e.g., development planning).

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1331 of 1447 ends

50 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 51 commitment to invest the staff time and
resources to understand the unique needs
of smaller neighborhood segments, and is
working to address those needs. This will
require a mix of strategies and engagement
activities like integrating urban forestry
programs with other City services or
developing tree related incentives and rebates.

It may also require an expansion of City staff
and/or increasing its partnership with the
Sacramento Tree Foundation, which currently
leads the urban forest related engagement
efforts of the City, to dedicate more time
building relationships in underserved areas.

Underserved neighborhoods are in
need of trees:

The Office of Environmental Health
Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) on behalf
of the California Environmental Protection
Agency (CalEPA) developed the California
Communities Environmental Health Screening
Tool (CalEnviroScreen) which identifies a
will be important for the City to demonstrate
an equitable level of investment into both
communities to limit the perception of favoring
one community over another. This will include
upholding the same standards for commercial
and residential development, expectations
of private property owners to preserve and
expand canopy cover, and planting and
maintaining trees in the public space.

An education campaign for private
property owners is needed:

Private property owners manage a significant
amount of the Rancho Cordova’s canopy
cover. Private property owners also have the
most available space to plant new trees in
the City. This combination underscores the
scale by which private property owners can
impact the preservation and expansion of the
urban forest. Increasing participation from
private landowners requires an outreach and
engagement strategy that demonstrates
to communities that the City is making a
1 2
3 FOCUS #3: GROWING THE URBAN FOREST Urban Forest Management Challenges Unique approaches are needed for
the developed and undeveloped
portions of the city:

Land use in the City of Rancho Cordova is
largely divided along Sunrise Blvd, with an
established urban footprint to the north
and west of Sunrise Blvd, and planned
development for the area to the south and
east of Sunrise Blvd. The differences in
developed and undeveloped land use are
reflected in the strategies the City implements
to effectively expand canopy cover and
establish and maintain healthy trees for current
and future residents. The developed footprint
of the City requires more focus on preserving
and protecting mature trees, in addition to
planting new trees with unique approaches
on private property. The undeveloped area
requires more focus on effectively and
sustainably incorporating trees into new
residential development, by reassessing
minimum planting spaces required. While the
strategies are specific for each situation, it
communities vulnerability to pollution hazards
based on their pollution burden and population
characteristics (https://oehha.ca.gov/
calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-30).

According to CalEnviroScreen 18% of Rancho
Cordova residents are considered to have
a high vulnerability to pollution hazards,
with 53% having a moderate to high level of
vulnerability. These neighborhoods also have a
canopy cover between 7%-12%, which is below
the Citywide target of 20% presented in the
UFMP. The combination of a high vulnerability
to pollution hazards and low canopy cover
necessitates prioritizing efforts to increase
the population of large healthy trees in these
neighborhoods. Accomplishing this requires
participation from residents, businesses and
other private landowners to plant and preserve
trees on private property, as there are few
remaining locations in the public space for the
City to plant trees.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1332 of 1447 ends

52 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 53 coordination on tree placement and species
selection. This has resulted in some residential
communities built in the last 15 years already
experiencing conflicts between trees and
sidewalks that required the removal of trees
to repair the damage at a significant cost to
the city. New residential home builders will
need to understand how the standards impact
their projects and if they will incur additional
project costs or delays in development.

Implementation of the new standards will be
difficult without a commitment from all City
staff and elected officials.

There is a need to increase
awareness of and compliance with
the City’s tree protection ordinance:

The City Municipal Code Chapter 19.12
Preservation and Protection of Trees
establishes policy to protect trees on private
property which includes a variety of native
trees that can grow to maturity, provide a high
level of canopy cover, and avoid conflicts with
other infrastructure.

Tree planting plans must be included
in the beginning of the planning
review process:

The ability of the City to effectively integrate
trees into new development in part depends
on the coordination between the Department
of Public Works and Community Development
to create and implement design standards
that will ensure trees are incorporated
throughout the design process and afforded
the necessary above- and below-ground
growing space to reach maturity, while
minimizing conflicts with other infrastructure
such as roads and sidewalks, streetlights, solar
panels, and underground utilities. The City is
improving the site plan review process, but
faces challenges from the previous lack of
1 2
3 FOCUS #4: DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN FOREST PROTECTION Urban Forest Management Challenges Trees are not effectively integrated
into new developments:

Expanding canopy cover in the built urban
environment is often limited by planning
decisions that occurred years ago and left
limited space to plant trees in parkways, or
on land designated as a commercial property
or parking lot. It is uncommon for municipal
arborists to have a relatively blank canvas
with which to plan and design an urban
forest. However, the planned development of
approximately 25,000 new single-family home
units in the City presents an opportunity to
plan and design communities with extensive
canopy cover that can provide a maximum
level of environmental services to residents,
with lower on-going maintenance costs to the
City. Implementing community development
and design standards, like the Sacramento Tree
Foundation Green Neighborhood program,
would ensure neighborhoods are built with
oak species and other non-native species
that meet a certain size. It was expressed by
City staff in interviews and stakeholders in
community engagement meetings that most
private property owners are not aware of the
City tree protection ordinance. This is further
supported by results of the public survey that
had 78% of respondents indicate that they
did not know the City had an urban forest
program until taking the survey. Increasing
canopy cover is dependent on both preserving
trees and planting new ones. It will be difficult
for the City to protect the existing canopy
and mature trees if residents are not aware of
the regulations that limit when trees can be
removed on private property and without the
enforcement of replacement policies.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1333 of 1447 ends

54 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 55 1 FOCUS #5: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS Urban Forest Management Challenges to adopt the recommendations of the UFMP,
and to implement steps to reach the goals
and objectives of the UFMP. The interviews
revealed that running a successful City for the
benefit of the residents was the primary value
of City staff.
2 The city should engage a broad
range of groups and stakeholders
in stewardship of Rancho Cordova’s
urban forest:

While the direct management of the Cityowned portion of the urban forest is the responsibility of the Department of Public
Works, a variety of City internal stakeholders,
such as Community Development, and external
stakeholders such as Sacramento Municipal
Utility District (SMUD), Cordova Recreation
& Parks District (CRPD), and the Sacramento
Tree Foundation, have a direct influence on
the management of the urban forest. These
external partners provide a wide range of
expertise and resources that benefit the
Rancho Cordova urban forest program. They
also manage large areas of land, such as parks
and schools, that offer strategic opportunities
to expand the urban forest where residents
live and play. The partnership between the
City, external stakeholders, community
members, and business owners can benefit by
establishing a working group to define shared
goals and resources.

Collaboration and positive outcomes
drive decisions by city staff, elected
officials, and stakeholders:

Throughout the urban forest master plan
(UFMP) process City staff and external
stakeholders consistently displayed a
willingness to actively participate in the
development of the UFMP, and to contribute
staff time and resources to the implementation
of UFMP goals and objectives. The extent to
which Rancho Cordova will be successful in
reaching the goals established in the UFMP
is largely dependent on the willingness of
City Council, staff and external stakeholders
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1334 of 1447 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 57
The Rancho Cordova UFMP is a planning document with goals that will be achieved over a 40-year timeframe. The vision statement describes the long-term desired result of those actions. The vision statement is a guide for UFMP development and should continue to guide the City in future decisions about the urban forest and its management.

STRATEGIC PLAN
Strategic Plan
Vision Statement
Working in partnership as community members, stakeholders and the City, we will improve public health, access to nature, and environmental equity for all of Rancho Cordova through sustainable management of the urban forest.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1335 of 1447 ends

58 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 59 The remaining aspects of the Strategic Plan provide goals, targets, and actions to guide the City in achieving its vision for the urban forest.

Guiding principles: Reflect the identified values of the City and community stakeholders as priorities for the UFMP.

Focus: Represent the five main overarching areas of the urban forest program.

Goals: Provide a desired outcome for the focus areas.

Targets: Measurable ways to determine if the City is progressing towards its goals.

Actions: Specific steps the City will take to achieve targets.

Guiding Principles Definition
Access and Equity All communities have equal access to the benefits of trees.

Healthy and Active
Communities
Trees create a healthy environment for active transportation and recreation, with vibrant and diverse outdoor space and habitat for wildlife.

A City Planned for Trees
Tree species are selected for planting in the development of the urban landscape to grow to maturity without interfering with adjacent infrastructure and contribute to canopy cover goals.

Provide Resources for
Sustainable Management
The City funds the urban forest program at a level to meet the goals of the UFMP.

Partnerships and
Engagement
Priorities of the urban forest program are developed with and achieved by collaborating with community members and external stakeholders.

Resiliency and
Climate Change
The City will develop an urban forest to thrive against current and future environmental threats.

FOCUS #1: Urban Forest Sustainability
Goal: The City-managed tree population will be resilient and prepared for climate change.

Targets

1.1 The City tree inventory will comprise no more than 5% of one species, 10% of one genus, or 20% of one family, excluding areas with defined strategies for native or regional species.

1.2 The City recommended tree species list will comprise a minimum of 65% of trees that are known to be very-low or low water use trees by the Water Use Classification of Landscape Species rankings.

Recommended Actions

1.A
Update the City’s recommended tree species list so all trees are expected to be adapted to anticipated climate conditions. Continue to include new species into the City tree planting list that are drought tolerant, resilient to heat, and promote species diversity.

1.B
Annually complete a health assessment of mature trees to assist in determining if tree species are maintaining health and vigor in response to climate change or should be removed from the planting list.

1.C Annually monitor the City’s oak trees to ensure they remain a healthy asset.

1.D Develop an appropriate maintenance plan to preserve tree canopy cover, and a strategy to remove and replace failing species.

1.E Work with Sacramento County to ensure native tree species are prioritized to be planted along The American River Parkway.

1.F Prioritize large stature trees in developing areas of the City.

1.G Prioritize native trees in wildland areas.

1.H Every two years conduct an audit of the City tree inventory to ensure species are predicted to be adapted to increase in heat and drought conditions in Rancho Cordova due to climate change.

Strategic Plan: Urban Forest Sustainability
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1336 of 1447 ends

60 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 61 FOCUS #2: Tree Management and Maintenance
Goal: Trees in Rancho Cordova will be maintained to improve the health, longevity, safety and functional capacity of the existing urban forest, and ensure that the future urban forest can reach its genetic potential to provide the full range of services in a safe and cost-effective way.

Targets

2.1 The urban forest program will have the financial and human resources necessary to be managed at a sustainable level by increasing urban forestry funding to a minimum level of $9.40 per capita by 2035 or sooner.

2.2 The City tree inventory will maintain a minimum of 80% of trees rated as having a good or better health rating.

2.3 The City tree inventory will maintain a minimum of 80% of trees rated as having a good or better structural rating.

Recommended Actions

2.A Establish the City Arborist as a full-time permanent staff position.

2.B Continue, and enhance, the Urban Forest Program Stump Removal Service program.

2.C Develop a funding mechanism to support the watering and establishment care of newly planted City maintained trees for a minimum three-year period.

2.D Complete a financing study of the urban forest program that provides analysis for the fiscal impact to implement the UFMP and mechanisms to fund tree management.

2.E Increase performance auditing of City contractors to ensure work is performed to City standards.

2.F Increase resources to support effective and proactive pest, disease and invasive species management.

2.G Ensure the Ballot Measure H 0.5 cent sales tax increase continues to fund the Community Enhancement Fund.

2.H Ensure Measure R becomes a source of funding for the urban forest to meet program goals.

2.I Maintain funding for a five-year inspection and pruning cycle for City-managed trees.

2.J Annually review the level of funding generated through in-lieu mitigation fees and appropriate funds to tree planting and establishment care projects.

2.K Develop and apply tree maintenance specifications.

2.L Add a tree service request functionality to the Fresh Connect online service request portal.

2.M Ensure consistent application of tree establishment care operations for all City-managed trees including watering and structural pruning.

2.N Implement a “3-in-10” (or better) young tree structural pruning program for City-managed trees.

2.O
Regularly review and update City tree management practices to reflect the current industry standards as defined by the International Society of Arboriculture, American National Standards Institute, and current research.

2.P
Trees planted as part of a City managed project will be inspected and approved by a qualified arborist before planting to ensure trees have good structure, no girdling roots, and are in good health.

2.Q Enhance tree inventory to include standards-based tree risk assessment.

2.R Develop a tree risk management policy.

Strategic Plan: Tree Management and Maintenance
ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1337 of 1447 ends

62 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 63

2.S Continue, and enhance application of, conservation-based tree risk mitigation.

2.T
Inspect trees for signs of decline, insect infestation, or pathogen infection. Collect samples from suspect trees and submit to a diagnostic laboratory or the Agriculture Commissioner’s Office of Sacramento County.

2.U Enhance the tree inventory to include pest and disease identification if observed.

2.V Develop IPM-based monitoring and response plans and procedures for priority pests and diseases

2.W Increase community awareness of urban forest pests, diseases, and invasive species Strategic Plan: Growing the Urban Forest
FOCUS #3: Growing the Urban Forest
Goal: Citywide canopy cover will continue to expand and be equitably distributed across all neighborhoods.

Targets

3.1 Achieve a minimum of 20% canopy cover of all census tracts in the developed footprint of the city by 2050.

3.2 Annually plant 750 trees on residential properties through the Sacramento Shade Program that advance the city towards its canopy cover goal.

3.3 Annually plant 750 City-managed trees on public property advance the city towards its canopy cover goal.

3.4 Maintain a 95% stocking rate of all available city managed tree planting locations.

3.5 Achieve a minimum 35% canopy cover over sidewalks, streets, and front yards in all existing residential communities.

Recommended Actions

3.A Identify and maintain a list of all possible City managed tree planting locations including streets, city facilities, and open space areas to inform planting plans.

3.B Increase enforcement of the city policy that requires 50% canopy cover over parking lots on commercial and industrial properties.

3.C Develop a strategy to provide City services on trees located in the front yards of residential homes.

3.D City-maintained stormwater basins will prioritize the planting of large stature trees and species known to support native habitat and wildlife.

3.E City-maintained naturally occurring open space areas will prioritize the planting of large stature trees and species known to support native habitat and wildlife.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1338 of 1447 ends

64 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 65

3.F Work with local tree nurseries to ensure tree species and quantities are available to meet City tree planting goals.

3.G
Conduct an urban heat island mapping exercise of the City to determine locations that experience the greatest impact from the urban heat island effect and utilize this information to prioritize locations for increased tree planting and management activities.

3.H Ensure all City bus stops are provided with adequate canopy cover so that passengers can safely use public transit.

3.I Ensure all residents have access to parks and schools with a high level of canopy cover.

3.J Prioritize tree planting activities towards to streets that feed into schools and parks.

3.K Prioritize the use of large stature trees in areas of high-density housing where parklets are designed as a community feature.

3.L Assess and identify neighborhoods with low canopy cover and focus tree planting activities in these locations.

3.M Plant trees along populated walkways and thoroughfares that provide access to bus stops and other forms of public transportation.

3.N Complete an updated City-wide canopy cover study every 3-5 years.

3.O Prioritize tree planting efforts towards neighborhoods with the lowest level of tree canopy cover and those identified by CalEnviroScreen 3.0 as having a high vulnerability to pollution hazards.

Strategic Plan: Development and Urban Forest Protection FOCUS #4: Development and Urban Forest Protection
Goal: The City will ensure that development projects are directed towards meeting urban forest program goals and that planning decisions are guided by arboricultural knowledge and expertise.

Targets

4.1 City planning documents will be updated by 2025 so they include trees and urban forestry elements that contribute to achieving City canopy cover goals.

4.2 All review and permit processes that include tree related decisions will incorporate the expertise of an objective certified arborist by 2022.

4.3 All new residential communities will be designed and built to achieve a 35% canopy cover over the entire community within 30 years.

Recommended Actions

4.A Update all Specific Plans to reflect the goals and strategies presented in the UFMP.

4.B Revise Design Guidelines to allow planter strips to separate sidewalks from the street edge in areas with high pedestrian activity.

4.C Review and update the parking lot shading requirement so it is directed towards encouraging the planting of large stature shade trees and providing the soil volume needed for healthy growth.

4.D Review and update the General Plan based on goals, standards, and recommendations presented in the UFMP.

4.E
Pedestrian Master Plan and Bicycle Master Plan - Update both documents to incorporate trees and strategies of the UFMP. Shading of walking trails, bike paths, and other avenues for non-vehicular travel.

4.F Update the City design guidelines to include the use of alternative sidewalk design methods if the minimum parkway width or soil volume levels cannot be achieved through existing conditions.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1339 of 1447 ends

66 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 67

4.G Develop mechanisms that require or incentivize trees to be preserved during site development when feasible.

4.H Review the tree replacement ratios to ensure they replace lost canopy over a shorter time frame and promote the use of medium to large stature trees.

4.I Include trees in the first stages of community development so the size of planting space available for street trees can accommodate large stature trees.

4.J Revise City standards so all new development, including new residential home communities, will be designed with parkways that are a minimum of 8’ in width between the curb and sidewalk.

4.K
Create standards that maximize the potential for energy efficient homes and communities by ensuring trees can shade and cool homes/buildings without interfering with the ability of solar panels to generate energy.

4.L
Develop the process for new residential home communities to receive certification as a ‘Green Neighborhood’ through the Sacramento Tree Foundation Green Neighborhood program as a condition of approval for development.

4.M
Revise City standards so all tree planting projects and development plans for new residential home communities will select tree species based on the city recommended tree species list and comply with standards for tree spacing and species diversity.

4.N Require certified arborists to complete tree surveys and reports submitted to the city for development projects

4.O Include City arborist or on-call third party consulting arborist review of all tree surveys and reports submitted to the city.

4.P Include City arborist or on-call third party consulting arborist review of all tree removal permit applications.

4.Q
Include City arborist or on-call third party consulting arborist review of all development plans in the initial stages of planning so there is ample time to update plans to meet the recommendations of the arborist review.

4.R Update the process for emergency conditions so a City designated certified arborist who is ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified is required to decide the appropriate response to tree emergencies.

4.S
Update the plan and review process for development projects to state that the City arborist must verify that tree planting plans match the approved plan and have the authority to reject any trees that do not meet American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1) Strategic Plan: Development and Urban Forest Protection ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1340 of 1447 ends

68 | RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN RANCHO CORDOVA URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN | 69 Strategic Plan: Community Engagement and Partnerships
FOCUS #5: Community Engagement and Partnerships
Goal: The City of Rancho Cordova will have an engaged citizenry who benefit equally from the benefits and services provided by trees and meaningful partnerships to gain support for and further define the priorities of the urban forest program.

Targets

5.1 Annually have a minimum of 1,000 community stakeholders participate in urban forest programs.

5.2 Annually a minimum of 500 trees will be planted in diverse communities as well as disinvested parts of the City on both public and private property.

5.3 City partnerships with other government and private landowners will result in a 50% increase in canopy cover on non-City managed property by 2050.

Recommended Actions

5.A Develop an education and outreach program that provides residents with training and information on proper tree care and maintenance.

5.B Maintain a list of trusted arborists and tree trimming companies that residents should use.

5.C Increase awareness of the urban forest program through an expansion of community engagement efforts through City communications and the Sacramento Tree Foundation.

5.D Hold community events throughout the year to increase stakeholder participation in the urban forest program and further engagement in refining UFMP strategies and implementation.

5.E
Develop print, social media, and web-based engagement platforms to update community stakeholders and City departments on implementation of the UFMP and other urban forest program activities.

5.F Increase public awareness of the tree preservation ordinance.

5.G Conduct outreach to property managers of apartment complexes, single-family homes, and other residential dwellings to encourage participation in the urban forest program.

5.H
Develop relationships with community leaders that are inclusive of the diverse demographics of the City and implement in-person, culturally competent engagement activities to targeted demographics and communities when feasible.

5.I Ensure tree planting programs address the long-term maintenance costs of trees, especially in disadvantaged communities.

5.J Provide the resources to have a full-time Sacramento Tree Foundation staff member dedicated to supporting City community engagement efforts and expansion of the urban forest.

5.K Explore an expansion of the partnership between SMUD, SacTree, and the City to determine if other opportunities exist to benefit community members.

5.L
Increase coordination between SMUD and the City on utility line clearance pruning, and in the planning, design, and implementation of future projects to prevent future tree/infrastructure conflicts.

5.M
Partner with Cordova Recreation and Parks District (CRPD), Folsom Cordova Unified School District (FCUSD), Twin Rivers Unified School District, and Sacramento City Unified School District on a grant application to fund a complete inventory of all CRPD managed park trees and school disctrict managed trees.

5.N Collaborate with CRPD and FCUSD on grant applications to support tree planting, establishment care, and tree inventory activities.

5.O Develop an interagency working group between SacTree, SMUD, CRPD, FCSD, other relevant agencies and the city to coordinate urban forestry activities throughout Rancho Cordova.

5.P
Develop an urban forest advisory committee consisting of City staff, the City arborist, Sacramento Tree Foundation, and community stakeholders to guide the implementation of the UFMP. Ensure the advisory committee leverages existing urban forest-related volunteer and community engagement efforts to expand the City’s community partnerships

5.Q Collaborate with CRPD and FCUSD to develop a tree planting palette that is aligned with city recommendations and prioritizes trees that support native habitat and wildlife.

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1341 of 1447 ends

Rancho Cordova City CouncilMarch 21, 2022

Rancho Cordova City Council
March 21, 2022