CONSTRUCTION NOISE STANDARDS
To analyze noise impacts originating from the construction of Ritz -Carlton Residences, noise from construction activities are typically evaluated against standards established under a City's Municipal Code. The Municipal Code noise standards for construction are described below for the City of Rancho Mirage to determine the potential noise impacts at nearby receiver locations.
To control noise impacts associated with the construction of the proposed Project, the City has established limits to the hours of operation. The City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, Section
15.04.030 indicates that construction, shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekdays. Construction activity is not permitted on Sundays or major holidays. (1) However, neither the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan or Municipal Code establish numeric maximum acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase.
According to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, local noise ordinances are typically not very useful in evaluating construction noise. They usually relate to nuisance and hours of allowed activity, and sometimes specify limits in terms of maximum levels, but are generally not practical for assessing the impact of a construction project. Project construction noise criteria should account for the existing noise environment, the absolute noise levels during construction activities, the duration of the construction, and the adjacent land use. The FTA provides noise level criterion of 80 dBA Leq at residential land uses that indicates when noise control measures should be evaluated. The FTA states, "While it is not the purpose of this manual to specify standardized criteria for construction noise impact, the ... Guidelines can be considered reasonable criteria for assessment. If these criteria are exceeded, there may be adverse community reaction." (2) In addition to absolute noise limits, the temporary noise level increases over the existing ambient conditions must be considered under CEQA Significance Threshold A. Recent court cases have also placed an emphasis on the increase as opposed to the noise level limit. However, limits and acceptable increases are not unrelated since, often, the noise level limits can subtly include the increase limit.
While specific noise ordinances can vary widely, many jurisdictions across California set construction noise level limits around 75 to 80 dBA Leq and only allow construction during daytime hours (e.g., City and County of Los Angeles, City and County of San Diego, City and County of San Francisco, etc.) In contrast, everyday noise limits are stricter because they apply to continuous, long-term activities where excessive noise can greatly affect the quality of life over time. Thus, for everyday noise limits, many jurisdictions across California set residential daytime noise level limits around 55 dBA Leq during daytime hours. This implies that during daytime hours, many California communities consider an increase of 20 dBA over the daytime limit an acceptable temporary increase for construction activities. This is also illustrated in the adoption of many CEQA documents statewide that use an 80 dBA Leq limit for assessing construction impacts while using everyday noise level limits of local noise ordinances in assessing on -site operational impacts.
URBAN CROSSROADS
1205
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
However, since an increase of 20 dBA could result in noise levels over 85 dBA Leq, which the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CaIOSHA) identifies as a potentially hazardous noise level, the increase should not be allowed to result in an absolute noise level greater than 80 dBA Leq at any residence, which is consistent with the FTA recommendations.
Therefore, if the Project -related construction noise levels generate a temporary noise level increase above the existing daytime ambient noise levels of up to 20 dBA Leq, not to exceed 80 dBA Leq, or an increase of 5 dBA Leq above the existing nighttime ambient noise levels, then the Project construction noise level increases will not be considered a potentially significant impact.
SENSITIVE RECEIVER LOCATIONS
To assess the potential for short-term construction noise impacts, the following sensitive receiver locations, as shown in Exhibit C, were identified as representative locations for analysis. Sensitive receivers are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could otherwise adversely affect the use of the land. Noise -sensitive land uses are generally considered to include schools, hospitals, single-family dwellings, mobile home parks, churches, libraries, and recreation areas. Moderately noise -sensitive land uses typically include multi -family dwellings, hotels, motels, dormitories, outpatient clinics, cemeteries, golf courses, country clubs, athletic/tennis clubs, and equestrian clubs. Land uses that are considered relatively insensitive to noise include business, commercial, and professional developments.
Land uses that are typically not affected by noise include: industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, undeveloped land, parking lots, warehousing, liquid and solid waste facilities, salvage yards, and transit terminals.
To describe the potential off -site Project noise levels, 8 receiver locations in the vicinity of the Project site were identified. All distances are measured from the Project site boundary to the outdoor living areas (e.g., private backyards) or at the building facade, whichever is closer to the Project site. The selection of receiver locations is based on FHWA guidelines and is consistent with additional guidance provided by Caltrans and the FTA. (3) (2) Other sensitive land uses in the Project study area that are located at greater distances than those identified in this noise analysis will experience lower noise levels than those presented in this report due to the additional attenuation from distance and the shielding of intervening structures. Distance is measured in a straight line from the Project boundary to each receiver location.
R1: Located approximately 591 feet north of the Project site, R1 represents existing residential homes (1 Santa Rosa Mountain Lane) west of Frank Sinatra Drive. A 24 -hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L1, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R2: Location R2 represents the Ritz -Carlton Rancho Mirage located northeast of the Project site at roughly 66 feet. A 24 -hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L2, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R3: Location R3 represents the existing residential homes (29 Grande View Court) on the south side of Mirada Circle at approximately 21 feet from the Project site.
R4: Location R4 represents the existing residential home located at 30 Grande View Court approximately 33 feet from the Project site boundary.
R5: Location R5 represents the existing residential home located at 31 Mirada Circle approximately 69 feet from the Project site boundary.
URBAN CROSSROADS
1206
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
R6: Location R6 represents the existing residential home located at 46 Mirada Circle approximately 108 feet from the Project site boundary.
R7: Location R7 represents the existing residential home located 45 Mirada Circle approximately 125 feet from the Project site boundary.
R8: Location R8 represents the existing residential home located at 1 Mirada Circle approximately 160 feet from the Project site boundary.
EXHIBIT C: RECEIVER AND CONSTRUCTION NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS G�3
Heavy equipment (80,000 pounds or
more), vibratory rollers, large fully loaded
trucks, and jackhammers shall not be used
within 75 feet of any receiver location at
the time of Project construction.
LEGEND;
Con truttion Activity # nista me from receiver t6 Projeti SitE boundary {in feel I ReCeii r LCOtiCr15 75-fDat buffer for large loaded trucks and mobile equipment (›61J DO] lbs_)
CADNAA NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
To fully describe the exterior construction noise levels from the Project, Urban Crossroads, Inc. developed a noise prediction model using the CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement)
URBAN CROSSROADS
1207
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
computer program. CadnaA can analyze multiple types of noise sources using the spatially accurate Project site plan georeferenced Nearmap aerial imagery, topography, buildings, and barriers in its calculations to predict outdoor noise levels. Using the ISO 9613 protocol, CadnaA will calculate the distance from each noise source to the noise receiver locations, using the ground absorption, distance, and barrier/building attenuation inputs to provide a summary of the noise level at each receiver and the partial noise level contributions by noise source.
Consistent with the ISO 9613 protocol (4), the CadnaA noise prediction model relies on the reference sound power level (LW) to describe individual noise sources. While sound pressure levels (e.g., Leq) quantify in decibels the intensity of given sound sources at a reference distance, sound power levels (LW) are connected to the sound source and are independent of distance.
Sound pressure levels vary substantially with distance from the source and diminish because of intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption, wind, and other factors. Sound power is the acoustical energy emitted by the sound source and is an absolute value that is not affected by the environment.
The construction noise level calculations provided in this noise analysis account for the distance attenuation provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source (i.e., a point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. A default ground absorption factor of 0.5 was used in the noise analysis to account for mixed ground representing a combination of hard and soft surfaces.
CONSTRUCTION NOISE ASSESSMENT
This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from the short-term construction activities associated with the development of the Project. Exhibit C shows the construction activity boundaries in relation to the nearby sensitive receiver locations.
CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS
The FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual recognizes that construction projects are accomplished in several different stages and outlines the procedures for assessing noise impacts during construction. Each stage has a specific equipment mix, depending on the work to be completed during that stage. As a result of the equipment mix, each stage has its own noise characteristics; some stages have higher continuous noise levels than others, and some have higher impact noise levels than others. The Project construction activities are expected to occur in the following stages:
• Demolition
• Site Preparation
• Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating
URBAN CROSSROADS
1208
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
To describe construction noise activities, this construction noise analysis was prepared using reference construction equipment noise levels from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), which includes a national database of construction equipment reference noise emission levels. (9) The RCNM equipment database provides a comprehensive list of the noise -generating characteristics for specific types of construction equipment. In addition, the database provides an acoustical usage factor to estimate the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Consistent with FTA guidance for detailed construction noise assessment, Table 1 presents the combined noise levels for the loudest construction activities expected for each stage, assuming all equipment operates at the same time.
TABLE 1: CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
Construction
Stage
Reference
Construction
Equipmnet
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Composite Reference
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Demolition
Concrete Saw
83.0 84.4
Excavator
77.0 Backhoe
74.0 Site
Preparation
Tractor
80.0 82.9
Front End Loader
75.0 Dozer
78.0 Grading
Tractor
80.0 84.2
Grader
81.0 Compactor (ground)
76.0 Building
Construction
Crane
73.0 82.1
Generator
78.0 Gradall
79.0 Paving
Paver
74.0 77.8
Dump Truck
72.0 Roller
73.0 Architectural
Coating
Man Lift
68.0 76.2
Compressor (air)
74.0 Generator (<25kVA)
70.0 FHWA Road Construction Noise Model.
CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS
Construction activities are best evaluated as mobile sources since these activities tend to vary considerably, not only as the speed and power of the equipment varies, but also as the
URBAN CROSSROADS
1209
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
equipment constantly changes in terms of its distance from the receivers and its relative location. (5) Construction projects involve various stages, and activities frequently shift from one location to another. For example, during the initial stages, noise -generating activities might concentrate in one area, and then move to another section as construction progresses.
Using the reference construction equipment noise levels and the CadnaA noise prediction model, calculations of the Project construction noise level impacts by phase at the nearby sensitive receiver locations were completed. To account for the dynamic nature of construction activities, the CadnaA construction noise analysis evaluates the noise source activities as multiple moving point sources or work crews within the limits of construction for the loudest phase of construction activity. Construction impacts are based on the highest noise level calculated at each receiver location and the relative difference between construction phases. As shown in Table 2, the construction noise levels by phase are expected to range from 43.3 to 70.3 dBA Leq at the nearby receiver locations. Appendix B includes the detailed CadnaA construction noise model inputs.
TABLE 2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY
Receiver
Location'
Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq)
Demolition
Site
Preparation
Grading
Building
Construction
Paving
Architectural
Coating
Highest
Levels'
R1
51.5 50.0
51.4 49.2
45.0 43.3
51.5 R2
69.2 67.7
69.1 66.9
62.7 61.0
69.2 R3
69.9 68.4
69.8 67.6
63.4 61.7
69.9 R4
70.3 68.8
70.2 68.0
63.8 62.1
70.3 R5
69.9 68.4
69.8 67.6
63.4 61.7
69.9 R6
64.8 63.3
64.7 62.5
58.3 56.6
64.8 R7
66.2 64.7
66.1 63.9
59.7 58.0
66.2 R8
55.7 54.2
55.6 53.4
49.2 47.5
55.7 1Construction noise source and receiver locations are shown in Exhibit C.
Z Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the construction noise source activity to nearby receiver locations.
CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix B.
URBAN CROSSROADS
1210
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
TABLE 3: DAYTIME CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL INCREASES
Receiver
Location'
Highest
Construction
Noise Level'
Maximum
Limit
(dBA Ley)
Threshold
Exceeded?4
Measurement
Location3
Reference
Ambient
Noise
Levels"
Combined
Project
and
Ambients
Project
Increase6
Increase
Criteria
Increase
Criteria
Exceeded?
R1
51.5 80.0
No
L1
49.7 53.7
4.0 20.0
No
R2
69.2 80.0
No
L2
53.4 69.3
15.9 20.0
No
R3
69.9 80.0
No
L3
50.4 69.9
19.5 20.0
No
R4
70.3 80.0
No
L3
50.4 70.3
19.9 20.0
No
R5
69.9 80.0
No
L3
50.4 69.9
19.5 20.0
No
R6
64.8 80.0
No
L3
50.4 65.0
14.6 20.0
No
R7
66.2 80.0
No
L3
50.4 66.3
15.9 20.0
No
R8
55.7 80.0
No
L3
50.4 56.8
6.4 20.0
No
1 Construction noise source and receiver locations are shown on Exhibit C. 'Total Project daytime construction noise levels as shown in Table 2. 3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A, Ritz Carlton Residences Noise Study.. 4 Observed daytimeambient noise levels as shown in Table 5-1, Ritz Carlton Residences Noise Study. 5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project construction activities. 6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project construction activities. 1211
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL INCREASES
To describe the temporary Project construction noise level contributions to the existing ambient noise environment, the Project construction noise levels were combined with the existing ambient noise level measurements at the nearest off -site receiver locations. The difference between the combined Project -construction and ambient noise levels is used to describe the construction noise level contributions. Temporary noise level increases that would be experienced at sensitive receiver locations when Project construction -source noise is added to the ambient daytime conditions are presented in Table 3. A temporary noise level increase of 20 dBA is considered a potentially significant impact.
As indicated in Table 3, the Project will contribute to construction noise level increases ranging from 4.0 to 19.9 dBA Leq during the daytime hours at the nearest receiver locations. The unmitigated construction noise analysis shows that the nearest receiver locations will not exceed the substantial temporary noise level increase threshold of 20 dBA Leq or 80 dBA Leq threshold during Project construction activities. The temporary construction noise level increase analysis shows that the noise impacts due to Project construction noise are considered less than significant.
CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods employed. The operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Construction vibration is generally associated with pile driving and rock blasting. However, no pile -driving or rock -blasting activities are planned for the Project.
Unlike noise, which is measured from the center of activity and experienced over time, vibration refers to a single, instantaneous event affecting a building structure, typically caused by a specific piece of equipment. Ground -borne vibration is almost never a problem outdoors. (5 p. 118) Ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction equipment are summarized in Table 4. Based on the representative vibration levels presented for various construction equipment types, it is possible to estimate the potential for building damage using the following vibration assessment methods defined by the FTA. To describe the vibration impacts the FTA provides the following equation: VdBdistance = VdBref x 30Log (D/25) TABLE 4: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment
Vibration Decibels (VdB)
at 25 feet'
Small bulldozer
58 Jackhammer
79 Loaded Trucks
86 Large bulldozer
87 Vibratory Roller
94 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment
URBAN CROSSROADS
1212
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
Table 5 presents the expected Project related vibration levels at the nearby receiver locations. At distances ranging from 21 to 591 feet from Project construction activity, construction vibration velocity levels are expected to range from 45.8 to 89.3 VdB and will exceed the FTA 80 VdB threshold for human annoyance at receiver locations R2 through R5. The construction vibration analysis shows that the unmitigated Project -related vibration impacts will be potentially significant during the construction activities at the Project site, and mitigation is required.
TABLE 5: UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS Receiver'
Distance
to Const.
Activity
(Feet),
Receiver Vibration Levels (VdB)3
Threshold
(VdB)
Threshold
Exceeded? 4
Small
Bulldozer
Jack-
hammer
Loaded
Trucks
Large
Bulldozer
Vibratory
Roller
Highest
Vibration
Levels
R1
591'
16.8 37.8
44.8 45.8
52.8 52.8
80 No
R2
66'
45.4 66.4
73.4 74.4
81.4 81.4
80 Yes
R3
21'
60.3 81.3
88.3 89.3
96.3 96.3
80 Yes
R4
33'
54.4 75.4
82.4 83.4
90.4 90.4
80 Yes
R5
69'
44.8 65.8
72.8 73.8
80.8 80.8
80 Yes
R6
108'
38.9 59.9
66.9 67.9
74.9 74.9
80 No
R7
125'
37.0 58.0
65.0 66.0
73.0 73.0
80 No
R8
160'
33.8 54.8
61.8 62.8
69.8 69.8
80 No
1 Receiver locations are shown on Exhibit C.
2 Distance from receiver locations to the source of the nearest construction activity. 3 Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 4. 54Does the vibration level exceed the FTA acceptable vibration level? Therefore, a 75 -foot vibration buffer zone mitigation measure is required to restrict the use of heavy construction equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds), vibratory rollers, large loaded trucks, vibratory rollers, and jackhammers within 75 feet of occupied sensitive receiver locations R2 through R5. With the mitigation measures identified in this analysis and shown in Exhibit C, the mitigated vibration levels with the 75 -foot buffer zone will be reduced to 79.7 VdB and will satisfy the FTA 80.0 VdB threshold for human annoyance, as shown in Table 6. Therefore, impacts with the construction vibration mitigation measure identified in this study will be less than significant.
Further, vibration levels at the site of the closest sensitive receiver are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period but will occur rather only during the times that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the Project site perimeter. Moreover, construction at the Project site will be restricted to the daytime hours between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday to Saturday, consistent with City of Rancho Mirage requirements thereby, eliminating potential vibration impacts during the sensitive evening and nighttime hours.
URBAN CROSSROADS
1213
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
TABLE 6: MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS Receiver'
Distance
to Const.
Activity
(Feet)Z
Receiver Vibration Levels (VdB)3
Threshold
(VdB)
Threshold
Exceeded?4
Small
Bulldozer
Jack-
hammer
Loaded
Trucks
Large
Bulldozer
Vibratory
Roller
Highest
Vibration
Levels
R2
75'
43.7 64.7
71.7 72.7
79.7 79.7
80 No
R3
75'
43.7 64.7
71.7 72.7
79.7 79.7
80 No
R4
75'
43.7 64.7
71.7 72.7
79.7 79.7
80 No
R5
75'
43.7 64.7
71.7 72.7
79.7 79.7
80 No
'Receiver locations are shown on Exhibit C.
2 Distance from receiver locations to the source of the nearest construction activity. 3 Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 4. 'Does the vibration level exceed the FTA acceptable vibration level?
URBAN CROSSROADS
1214
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Ms. Joanne Chan
Kam Sang Company Inc.
November 26, 2024
REFERENCES
1. City of Rancho Mirage. Municipal Code, Sections 15.04.030.
2. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA Report No. 0123. September 2018.
3. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program. Technical Noise Supplement - A Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Sacramento, CA : s.n., September 2013.
4. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics — Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors — Part 2. s.l. : International Organization for Standardization, 2024. ISO 9613-2:2024.
5. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA Report No. 0123. September 2018.
URBAN
CROSSROADS
1215
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
APPENDIX A
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE MUNICIPAL CODE NOISE STANDARDS
URBAN
CROSSROADS
1216
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
This page intentionally left blank
URBAN
CROSSROADS
1217
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
Mirage Municipal Code
Pr, vr,o,c, Next Main Collapse Search Print
Title 8 HEALTH AND SAFETY
Chapter 8.45 NOISE
8.45.010 Purpose.
The city has established a quality of life and environment in which peace and quiet is highly valued by its residents, visitors and businesses. The existence of excessive noise within the city is a condition which is detrimental to the health, safety, comfort, welfare and quality of life of the citizenry and shall be regulated in the public interest. This chapter has been created to implement the goals and policies of the noise element of the city's general plan and to prohibit undesirable noises in the community. This chapter shall be referred to and cited as the Rancho Mirage noise ordinance. (Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.020 Definitions.
Ambient noise level means the all encompassing noise level associated with a given environment, being a composite of sounds from all sources, excluding the alleged offensive noise, at the location and approximate time at which a comparison with the alleged offensive noise is to be made.
Cumulative period means an additive period of time consisting of individual time segments which may be continuous or interrupted.
Decibel (dBA) means a unit of sound level measured on a sound level meter using the A -weighting network.
Emergency means any occurrence or set of circumstances involving actual or imminent physical danger, crisis, trauma or property damage which demands immediate action.
Noise level means the same as sound level the terms are interchangeable.
Person means any individual, association, partnership, corporation, organization, or public agency, including associated officer(s), employee(s) or department(s).
Sound level means the quantity of decibels measured using the frequency weighting of A of a sound level meter.
Sound level meter means an instrument meeting the American National Standards Institute's standard S 1.4-1983 or later revision, for Type 1 or Type 2 specifications; or an instrument and the associated recording and analyzing equipment which will provide equivalent data. (Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.030 Exterior noise level limits.
No person shall operate or cause to be operated any source of sound or allow the creation of sound or noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person which causes the noise level, as measured on any other property, to exceed:
A. The noise level for the applicable zone specified in Table A-1 for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour of the applicable time period.
Table A-1
Land Use/Zone
Residential, Low Density (R -E, H -R, R -L-2, R -L-3)
Residential, Medium and High Density, Hospital, Open
Space (OS, R -M, R -H, MHP)
Time of Day
7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Noise Level (dBA)
55 50
45 60
55 1218
10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
50 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
65 Commercial Office, Resort Commercial, Mixed Use,
Institutional (O, P, Rs -H, M -U)
6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
60 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
55 Commercial Neighborhood, General Commercial,
Commercial Recreation, Light Industrial (C -N, C -G, I -L) 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
70 65
10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
60 B. For cumulative periods of time less than thirty minutes in an hour, all the noise standards in Table A-1 are increased according to Table B-1.
Table B-1
Duration of Sound
dBA Adjustment
15-30 minutes per hour
+ 3
10-15 minutes per hour
+ 5
5-10 minutes per hour
+ 10
1-5 minutes per hour
+ 15
Any period of time less than 1 minute per hour
+ 20
C. If the measured ambient noise level exceeds the dBA limits in Table A-1, the noise limits and their adjustments for the first three categories in Table B-1 shall be increased in five dBA increments as needed to encompass or reflect said ambient noise level. The maximum noise level under the last two categories in Table B-1 shall be increased, if necessary, only to equal the ambient noise level. (Ord. 1015 § 2, 2011; Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.040 Noise level measurement.
A. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels shall be at the point of the property line of the affected property nearest the alleged offending noise source. If possible, the ambient noise shall be measured at the same location along the property line.
B. If the measurement location is on a boundary between two different locations, the noise level limit applicable to the lower noise zone shall apply.
C. Upon receipt of a complaint or a request to investigate, the code compliance officer, equipped with an American National Standards Institute Type 2 or better sound level meter, may investigate the complaint. The investigation shall consist of measurements and the gathering of data to adequately define the noise problem and shall include the following:
1. Type and measurement of noise source;
2. Location of noise source relative to complainant's or affected property;
3. Time period during which noise source is considered to be intrusive;
4. Total duration of noise levels measured;
5. Date(s) and time(s) of noise measurement survey. (Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.050 Special provisions and exemptions.
The following activities and noise sources shall be exempted from the provisions of this chapter:
A. School bands, school athletic and other activities occurring on a school campus; 1219
B. Outdoor gatherings, dance, shows, entertainment for events authorized through the city's special events process; C. Activities conducted in public parks and public playgrounds that are dependent upon such facilities for their operation;
D. Any emission of sound for purposes of alerting persons to an emergency or the general emission of sound during performance of emergency work;
E. Construction, alteration, repair, grading or improvement of any building, structure, road or improvement to real property for which a permit has been issued by the city if said construction occurs within the allowable hours set forth in Section 15.04.030(A)(10);
F. The operation of any equipment and machinery at any time within any zone by the city, its employees, or any agent or franchisee of the city in the course of performing maintenance, construction or trash collection. (Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.060 Additional prohibition.
It is unlawful and a nuisance for any person to keep, maintain or permit upon any lot or parcel of land within the city under his or her control any animal, including any fowl, which by any sound or cry shall habitually disturb the peace and comfort of any person in the reasonable and comfortable enjoyment of life or property. (Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.065 Landscape maintenance.
A. It is unlawful and a public nuisance for any person to permit or perform for -hire landscape and non- emergency exterior hardscape maintenance activities such as, but not limited to, tree trimming, re -seeding, lawn mowing, leaf blowing, dust and debris clearing and any other landscaping or nonemergency exterior hardscape maintenance activities which utilize any motorized saw, sander, drill, grinder, leaf -blower, lawnmower, hedge trimmer, edger, or any other similar tool or device any time on Saturday and Sunday and between the hours of six p.m. and seven a.m. the next day during weekdays, unless otherwise provided in this section.
B. The regular mowing or grooming of golf courses, grass tennis courts, grass croquet courts, and lawn bowling areas shall be exempt from the restrictions set forth in this section. The allowed work hours for mowing or green preparation for golf courses, grass tennis courts, grass croquet courts, and lawn bowling areas shall be between five thirty a.m. and seven p.m., seven days per week and during all seasons of the year.
C. Nothing set forth in this section shall permit any person from engaging in any activities that exceed the exterior noise level limits set forth in Section 8.45.030 or otherwise constitute a public nuisance as set forth in Section 14.60.325 of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 979, § 1, 2009; Ord. 936, § 3, 2006)
8.45.070 Administration.
The noise control program established by this chapter shall be administered by and is the responsibility of the code compliance division as directed by the director of the community development department. (Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995)
8.45.080 Violations and enforcement procedures.
Violations of this chapter are declared to be a nuisance and subject to the procedures, remedies and penalties set forth in Title 14. (Ord. 916 §4, 2006; Ord. 633 § 1(Exh. A), 1995) View the mobile version.
1220
This page intentionally left blank
URBAN
CROSSROADS
1221
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
APPENDIX B
CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS
URBAN
CROSSROADS
1222
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
This page intentionally left blank
URBAN
CROSSROADS
1223
12610-10 Noise Memo.docx
12610
CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 12610_05_Construction.cna Date: 28.10.24
Analyst: B. Lawson
Calculation Configuration
Configuration
Parameter
Value
General
Max. Error (dB)
0.00 Max. Search Radius (#(Unit,LEN))
2000.01
Min. Dist Src to Rcvr
0.00 Partition
Raster Factor
0.50 Max. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))
999.99
Min. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))
1.01 Min. Length of Section (%)
0.00 Proj. Line Sources
On
Proj. Area Sources
On
Ref. Time
Daytime Penalty (dB)
0.00 Recr. Time Penalty (dB)
5.00 Night-time Penalty (dB)
10.00 DTM
Standard Height (m)
0.00 Model of Terrain
Triangulation
Reflection
max. Order of Reflection
2 Search Radius Src
100.00
Search Radius Rcvr
100.00
Max. Distance Source - Rcvr
1000.00 1000.00
Min. Distance Rvcr - Reflector
1.00 1.00
Min. Distance Source - Reflector
0.10 Industrial (ISO 9613)
Lateral Diffraction
some Obj
Obst. within Area Src do not shield
On
Screening
Incl. Ground Att. over Barrier
Dz with limit (20/25)
Barrier Coefficients C1,2,3
3.0 20.0 0.0
Temperature (#(Unit,TEMP))
10 rel. Humidity (%)
70 Ground Absorption G
030
Wind Speed for Dir. (#(Unit,SPEED))
3.0 Roads (RLS-90)
Strictly acc. to RLS-90
Railways (FTA/FRA)
Aircraft (777)
Strictly acc. to AzB
Receiver Noise Levels
Name
Sel.
M.
ID
Level Lr
Limit. Value
Land Use
Height
Coordinates
Day
Eve
Night
Day
Eve
Night
Type
Auto
Noise Type
X
Y
Z
(d8A)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
R1
R1
51.5 32.5
32.5 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498278.71
2223255.93
612.92
R2
R2
69.2 38.4
38.4 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498990.95
2222767.65
647.26
R3
R3
69.9 42.1
42.1 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498881.84
2222114.07
677.54
R4
R4
70.3 32.2
32.2 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498710.78
2222103.28
685.09
R5
R5
69.9 38.2
38.2 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498539.14
2222093.84
677.54
R6
R6
64.8 35.7
35.7 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498360.19
2222003.12
674.50
R7
R7
66.2 36.5
36.5 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6498216.10
2222028.54
671.45
R8
R8
55.7 25.4
25.4 80.0
0.0 0.0
5.00 r 6497921.76
2222287.44
640.91
Point Source(s)
Name Sel.
M. ID Result. PWL
Lw / Li
Value
Correction
Sound Reduction
Attenuation
Operating Time
Day
KO
Freq.
Direct.
Height
Coordinates
Day Evening Night Type
(dBA)
norm.
Day
Evening
Night
R
Area
Special
Night
X
Y
Line Source(s)
Name
(dBA)
(dBA)
dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) (ft=) (min) (min) (min) (dB) (Hz) (ft) (ft) (ft) Sel.
M.
ID
Result. PWL
Result PWL'
Lw / Li
Value
Correction
Sound Reduction
Attenuation
Operating Time
Day
(min) (min) (min) (dB) (Hz)
KO
Freq.
Direct.
Moving
Number
Day
(dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA)
Evening
Night
Day
Evening
Night
Type
norm.
Day
Evening
Night
R
Area
Special
Night
Name
ID
Height
Begin
Coordinates
End
y
Ground
dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A)
(fte)
Day
Evening
(ft) (ft)
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1224
Area Source(s)
Name
Sel.
M.
ID
Result. PWL
Result. PWL"
Lw/ Li
Correction
Sound Reduction
Attenuation
Operating Time
KO
Day
Evening
Night
Day
Evening
Night
Type
Value
norm.
Day
Evening
Night
R
Area
Day
Special
Night
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
(dBA)
dB(A)
dB(A)
dB(A)
dB(A)
(ft')
(min)
(min)
(min)
(dB)
SITEBOUNDARY
SITEBOUNDARY00001
122.0
16.0 16.0
75.1 -31.0
-31.0
PWL-Pt
116
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
SITEBOUNDARY
SITEBOUNDARY00002
109.8
109.8
109.8
65.2 65.2
65.2 Lw"
65.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 Name
ID
Height
Coordinates
Begin
End
x
y
z
Ground
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
SITEBOUNDARY
SITEBOUNDARY00001
8.00 r
6498380.67
2222673.55
626.49
618.49
6498403.33
2222664.71
631.50
623.50
6498426.73
2222658.03
633.44
625.44
6498450.64
2222653.58
634.43
626.43
6498474.87
2222651.40
634.75
626.75
6498499.19
2222651.50
634.75
626.75
6498523.40
2222653.89
634.75
626.75
6498547.28
2222658.54
634.75
626.75
6498570.61
2222665.41
634.75
626.75
6498593.20
2222674.45
635.44
627.44
6498614.84
2222685.56
638.57
630.57
6498635.33
2222698.67
640.13
632.13
6498651.94
222269167
641.41
633.41
6498669.17
2222688.83
642.77
634.77
6498686.74
2222687.21
643.91
635.91
6498704.38
2222687.84
643.91
635.91
6498721.80
2222690.70
643.91
635.91
6498738.72
2222695.74
643.91
635.91
6498754.36
2222706.57
643.91
635.91
6498768.86
2222718.88
643.91
635.91
6498782.07
2222732.57
643.91
635.91
6498793.86
2222747.49
643.91
635.91
6498804.13
2222763.50
643.91
635.91
6498825.16
2222752.98
643.91
635.91
6498832.75
2222761.75
643.91
635.91
6498915.11
2222705.67
643.91
635.91.
6498930.30
2222730.21
643.91
635.91
6499123.04
2222603.46
642.68
634.68
6499191.38
2222528.70
640.08
632.08
6499260.30
2222491.32
637.72
629.72
6499259.72
2222373.33
622.16
614.16
6499242.20
2222342.37
619.18
611.18
6499229.93
2222314.92
611.73
603.73
6499090.42
2222314.86
612.05
604.05
6499046.37
2222134.12
627.90
619.90
6498794.92
2222135.96
698.86
690.86
6498633.21
2222137.13
673.07
665.07
6498599.88
2222154.65
670.29
662.29
6498580.56
2222160.27
668.94
660.94
6498560.64
2222163.15
667.77
659.77
6498538.01
2222163.03
666.72
658.72
649852038
2222160.49
665.42
657.42
6498501.22
2222155.01
662.82
65482
6498434.51
2222122.97
662.10
654.10
6498414.61
222211630
660.99
652.99
6498394.04
222211107
659.66
651.66
6498373.12
2222110.36
658.96
650.96
6498352.14
2222111.19
658.98
650.98
6498331.42
2222114.54
658.49
650.49
6498311.25
2222120.37
657.36
649.36
6498291.93
2222128.58
654.65
646.65
6498273.74
2222139.07
653.07
645.07
6498259.63
2222149.79
653.07
645.07
6498175.29
2222238.75
653.07
645.07
6498136.34
2222272.54
653.07
645.07
6498115.19
2222287.32
645.57
637.57
6498085.39
2222304.63
643.91
635.91
6498082.82
2222307.03
643.91
635.91.
6498080.62
2222309.79
643.91
635.91
6498078.86
2222312.84
643.91
635.91
6498077.56
2222316.12
643.91.
635.91
6498078.19
2222321.70
64498
636.98
6498079.76
2222327.09
645.52
637.52
6498082.23
2222332.13
645.40
637.40
6498085.53
2222336.67
644.80
636.80
6498089.55
2222340.59
644.53
636.53
6498101.29
2222350.51
646.95
638.95
6498114.36
2222358.60
646.48
638.48
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
1225
Name
ID
Height
Coordinates
Begin
End
x
y
z
Ground
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
6498137.19
2222368.16
653.05
645.05
6498144.43
2222374.05
653.07
645.07
6498150.68
2222380.99
653.07
645.07
6498155.78
2222388.82
653.07
645.06
6498159.60
2222397.34
653.07
645.07
6498162.06
2222406.34
653.07
645.07
6498163.10
2222415.62
653.07
645.07
6498162.69
2222424.95
653.07
645.07
6498166.30
2222438.83
651.01
643.01
6498171.42
222245122
648.96
640.96
6498177.99
2222464.96
647.18
639.18
6498187.06
2222474.99
648.53
640.53
6498197.81
2222484.51
645.71
637.71
6498207.15
2222485.16
645.52
637.52
6498216.31
2222487.12
644.48
636.48
6498225.10
2222490.34
644.02
636.02
6498233.35
2222494.78
643.91
635.91
6498240.89
222250033
643.91
635.91
6498248.82
2222511.15
643.91
635.91
6498254.98
2222523.06
643.91
635.91
6498259.23
2222535.77
643.91
635.91
6498261.48
2222549.00
643.91
635.91
6498321.69
2222604.40
634.75
626.75
SITEBOUNDARY
SITEBOUNDARY00002
8.00 r
6499469.57
2223172.98
500.03
492.03
6499792.64
2222957.84
41.85 33.85
6499791.42
2222791.89
54.36 46.36
6499463.63
2222514.81
654.66
646.66
6499405.40
2222589.98
653.07
645.06
6499402.30
2222644.91
653.07
645.06
6499393.79
2222696.74
659.79
651.79
6499386.06
2222729.23
662.22
654.22
6499428.61
2222850.68
653.44
645.44
6499430.15
2222879.31
650.91
642.91
6499303.28
2222958.99
625.92
617.92
6499336.55
2223017.01
598.11
590.11
Barrier(s)
Name
Sel.
M.
ID
Absorption
left
Z-Ext.
Cantilever
Height
Coordinates
right
horz.
vert.
Begin
End
y
(ft)
z
Ground
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
Building(s)
Name
(ft)
Sel.
M.
ID
RB
Residents
Absorption
Height
Begin
Coordinates
(ft)
y
Ground
(ft)
Ground Absorption(s)
Name
Sel.
M.
ID
G
Coordinates
y
(ft)
(ft)
Vertical Area Source(s)
Name
(ft)
(ft)
ID
Height
Begin
Coordinates
End
y
Ground
(ft) (ft)
Rail
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
Name
Sel.
M.
ID
Lw'
Train Class
Correct.
Vmax
Day
(dBA) (dBA)
Night
Track
Sound Level Spectra
Name
(dB) (km(mph)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
ID
Type
1/3 Oktave Spectrum (dB)
Weight.
Roads
25 31.5
40 5
63 80
100 125
160
200
250 315 400
500 630
800
1000
1250 1600 2000
Name
Sel.
M.
ID
Lme
Count Data
exact Count Data
Speed Limit
Auto
SCS
Surface
Gradient
Mult. Reflection
Day
Evening
Night
DTV
Str.class.
M
p(%)
Truck
Dist.
Dstro
Type
Drefl
Hbuild
Dist.
2500
3150
4000 5000 6E
(dBA) (dBA) (dBA)
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
Day
Evening
Night Day
Evening
Night (mph) (mph)
1226
(dB)
(%) (dB) (ft) (ft)
RoadsGeo
Name
Height
Begin.
(ft)
Coordinates
Dist
LSlope
End
Y
Ground
(ft)
(%)
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
1227
Appendix Fl
Traffic Report
1228
URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
PREPARED BY:
Aric Evatt, PTP
[email protected]
(949) 660-1994 x204
Robert Vu, PE
[email protected]
(949) 660-1994 x238
JULY 20, 2020
12609-05 Report REV
1229
1230
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDICES III
LIST OF EXHIBITS V
LIST OF TABLES VII
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS IX
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Summary of Findings 1
1.2 Project Overview 1
1.3 Analysis Scenarios 3
1.4 Study Area 4
1.5 Analysis Findings 5
1.6 On -Site Roadway and Site Access Improvements 9
1.7 Sight Distance Analysis 12
1.8 Special Event Traffic Management Plan 12
2 METHODOLOGIES 17
2.1 Level of Service 17
2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis 17
2.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Methodology 19
2.4 Queuing Analysis 20
2.5 Minimum Level of Service (LOS) 20
2.6 Deficiency Criteria 20
3 AREA CONDITIONS 21
3.1 Existing Circulation Network 21
3.2 City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Circulation Element 21
3.3 Truck Routes 21
3.4 Transit Service 21
3.5 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities 27
3.6 Existing (2019) Traffic Counts 27
3.7 Existing Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis 31
3.8 Existing Conditions Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis 31
3.9 Queuing Analysis 31
4 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC 35
4.1 Project Trip Generation 35
4.2 Project Trip Distribution 35
4.3 Modal Split 39
4.4 Trip Assignment 39
4.5 Cumulative Growth Traffic 39
4.6 Horizon Year (2040) Volume Development 48
5 E+P TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 51
5.1 Roadway Improvements 51
5.2 E+P Traffic Volume Forecasts 51
5.3 E+P Intersection Operations Analysis 51
5.4 E+P Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis 51
5.5 E+P Queuing Analysis 51
12609-05 Report REV
12'31
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
5.6 Recommended Improvements 57
6 EAP (2023) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 59
6.1 Roadway Improvements 59
6.2 EAP (2023) Traffic Volume Forecasts 59
6.3 EAP (2023) Intersection Operations Analysis 59
6.4 EAP (2023) Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis 59
6.5 EAP (2023) Queuing Analysis 64
6.6 Recommended Improvements 64
7 EAPC (2023) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 67
7.1 Roadway Improvements 67
7.2 EAPC (2023) Traffic Volume Forecasts 67
7.3 EAPC (2023) Intersection Operations Analysis 67
7.4 EAPC (2023) Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis 67
7.5 EAPC (2023) Queuing Analysis 72
7.6 Recommended Improvements 72
8 HORIZON YEAR (2040) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 75
8.1 Roadway Improvements 75
8.2 Horizon Year Without Project Traffic Volume Forecasts 75
8.3 Horizon Year With Project Traffic Volume Forecasts 75
8.4 Intersection Operations Analysis 75
8.5 Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis 81
8.6 Queuing Analysis 81
8.7 Recommended Improvements 81
9 LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISMS 87
9.1 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program 87 10 REFERENCES 89
12609-05 Report REV
1232
etiCi iRiOit2krYS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT
APPENDIX 3.1: EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS - DECEMBER 2019
APPENDIX 3.2: EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 3.3: EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 3.4: EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS QUEUING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 4.1: POST PROCESSING WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 5.1: E+P CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 5.2: E+P CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 5.3: E+P CONDITIONS QUEUING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.1: EAP (2023) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.2: EAP (2023) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.3: EAP (2023) CONDITIONS QUEUING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.1: EAPC (2023) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.2: EAPC (2023) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.3: EAPC (2023) CONDITIONS QUEUING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 8.1: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 8.2: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 8.3: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT
ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 8.4: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT
ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 8.5: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS QUEUING ANALYSIS
WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 8.6: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS QUEUING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 12609-05 Report REV
12133
URBAN
C F 1Sh4RC . L S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1 23 4
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 2
EXHIBIT 1-2: LOCATION MAP 6
EXHIBIT 1-3: SUMMARY OF DEFICIENT INTERSECTIONS BY ANALYSIS SCENARIO 7 EXHIBIT 1-4: SITE ADJACENT ROADWAY AND SITE ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS 11 EXHIBIT 1-5: SIGHT DISTANCE 13
EXHIBIT 1-6: EVENT OPERATIONS PLANNING SCHEDULE 14
EXHIBIT 3-1: EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS 22 EXHIBIT 3-2: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT 23 EXHIBIT 3-3: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS -SECTIONS 24 EXHIBIT 3-4: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED TRUCK ROUTES 25 EXHIBIT 3-5: EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE 26
EXHIBIT 3-6: EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 28
EXHIBIT 3-7: EXISTING (2019) WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 29 EXHIBIT 3-8: EXISTING (2019) SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 30 EXHIBIT 3-9: EXISTING (2019) SUMMARY OF LOS 32
EXHIBIT 4-1: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 38
EXHIBIT 4-2: PROJECT ONLY WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 40
EXHIBIT 4-3: PROJECT ONLY SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 41
EXHIBIT 4-4: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP 42
EXHIBIT 4-5: CUMULATIVE ONLY WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 46 EXHIBIT 4-6: CUMULATIVE ONLY SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 47 EXHIBIT 5-1: E+P WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 52
EXHIBIT 5-2: E+P SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 53
EXHIBIT 5-3: E+P SUMMARY OF LOS 54
EXHIBIT 6-1: EAP (2023) WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 60
EXHIBIT 6-2: EAP (2023) SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 61
EXHIBIT 6-3: EAP (2023) SUMMARY OF LOS 62
EXHIBIT 7-1: EAPC (2023) WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 68
EXHIBIT 7-2: EAPC (2023) SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 69
EXHIBIT 7-3: EAPC (2023) SUMMARY OF LOS 70
EXHIBIT 8-1: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 76 EXHIBIT 8-2: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 77 EXHIBIT 8-3: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 78 EXHIBIT 8-4: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 79 EXHIBIT 8-5: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT SUMMARY OF LOS 82 EXHIBIT 8-6: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT SUMMARY OF LOS 83 12609-05 Report REV
1235
URBAN
f R2 ACA S4R C]A [JS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1236
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS 5
TABLE 2-1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION OF LOS 17 TABLE 2-2: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION OF LOS 18 TABLE 2-3: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOCATIONS 19
TABLE 3-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS 33 TABLE 3-2: PEAK HOUR QUEUING SUMMARY FOR EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS 34 TABLE 4-1: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY - TYPICAL OPERATION 36 TABLE 4-2: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY - WEEKEND SPECIAL EVENT 37 TABLE 4-3: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LAND USE SUMMARY 43
TABLE 4-4: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY 44 TABLE 5-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR E+P CONDITIONS 55
TABLE 5-2: PEAK HOUR QUEUING SUMMARY FOR E+P CONDITIONS 56 TABLE 6-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EAP (2023) CONDITIONS 63 TABLE 6-2: PEAK HOUR QUEUING SUMMARY FOR EAP (2023) CONDITIONS 65 TABLE 7-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EAPC (2023) CONDITIONS 71 TABLE 7-2: PEAK HOUR QUEUING SUMMARY FOR EAPC (2023) CONDITIONS 73 TABLE 8-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORIZON YEAR (2040) CONDITIONS 80 TABLE 8-2: PEAK HOUR QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR HORIZON YEAR (2040) CONDITIONS 84 12609-05 Report REV
1237
URBAN
C r¢ra�,4r�c�ac�s
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1238
URBAN
CwaO$zRraADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
(1) Reference
ADT Average Daily Traffic
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CMS Changeable Message Sign
CMP Congestion Management Program
CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments
E+P Existing Plus Project
EAP Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project
EAPC Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HCS Highway Capacity Software
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
LOS Level of Service
MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
N/A Not Applicable
NP Without Project
PeMS Performance Measurement System
PHF Peak Hour Factor
Project Ritz -Carlton Residences
PSA Public Service Announcements
RivTAM Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SAT Saturday
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
sf Square Feet
SHS State Highway System
TIA Traffic Impact Analysis
TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
WP With Project
12609-05 Report REV
1239
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1240
ILURBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed Ritz -Carlton Residences ("Project"), which is located north of Mirada Circle and east of Frank Sinatra Drive, in the City of Rancho Mirage as shown on Exhibit 1-1.
The purpose of this TIA is to evaluate the potential circulation system deficiencies that may result from the development of the proposed Project, and recommend improvements to achieve acceptable circulation system operational conditions. This TIA has been prepared based on scoping agreement with the City of Rancho Mirage. (1) To ensure that this TIA satisfies the City of Rancho Mirage's traffic study requirements, Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared a traffic study scoping package for review by City staff prior to the preparation of this report. The Agreement provides an outline of the Project study area, trip generation, trip distribution, and analysis methodology. The Agreement approved by the City is included in Appendix 1.1.
1.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
For Existing (2019), EAPC (2023), and Horizon Year (2040) traffic conditions, the addition of Project traffic to study area intersections did not result in deficient intersection LOS operations.
However, it is recommended that the following improvements be implemented to accommodate Horizon Year (2040) With Project weekend special event 95th percentile traffic flows:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage from 260' to 400' for the NBL movement • Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage from 170' to 250' for the EBL movement
1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW
It is our understanding that the Project is to expand the existing Ritz -Carlton hotel by 106 residential dwelling units, a 6,966 restaurant, and a 23,843 square foot venue. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the Project will be constructed within a single phase of development with a projected Opening Year of 2023.
Access to the Project site will be provided via the following roadways:
• Frank Sinatra Drive on SR -111 (full access)
Regional access to the project site is provided via the SR -111 at Frank Sinatra Drive. 12609-05 Report REV
1241
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Resid ences Tr affic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 1-1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
12609 - siteplan. dwg
liriA6!!D CROS SROADS
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
Trips generated by the Project's proposed land uses have been estimated based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. (2) The proposed Project is anticipated to generate a net total of 1,068 trip -ends per day, 51 AM peak hour trips and 86 PM peak hour trips.
It should be noted that the venue will generate trips outside the weekday AM and PM peak hours.
The trip generation estimate during special event has been calculated based on a maximum allowable occupancy of 0.8 per parking space. As such, the proposed Project (special event) is anticipated to generate a net total of 416 weekend peak hour trips.
The assumptions and methods used to estimate the Project's trip generation characteristics are discussed in greater detail in Section 4.1 Project Trip Generation of this report.
1.3 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
For the purposes of this traffic study, potential impacts to traffic and circulation have been evaluated for each of the following conditions:
• Existing (2019) Conditions
• E+P Conditions
• Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project (EAP) (2023) Conditions • Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project Plus Cumulative (EAPC) (2023) Conditions • Horizon Year (2040) Without Project
• Horizon Year (2040) With Project
All study area intersections will be evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition analysis methodology.
1.3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing physical conditions have been disclosed to represent the baseline traffic conditions as they existed at the time this report was prepared.
1.3.2 E+P CONDITIONS
The E+P analysis determines circulation system deficiencies that would occur on the existing roadway system in the scenario of the Project being placed upon Existing conditions.
1.3.3 EAP CONDITIONS
The EAP (2023) traffic conditions analyses determine potential traffic impacts based on a comparison of the EAP traffic conditions to Existing conditions. To account for background traffic growth, an ambient growth factor from Existing conditions of 6.12% (2 percent per year over 3 years, compounded annually) for 2023 conditions is included for EAP traffic conditions.
Consistent with County of Riverside traffic study guidelines, the EAP analysis is intended to identify "Opening Year" deficiencies associated with the development of the proposed Project based on the expected background growth within the study area. 12609-05 Report REV
1243
UREA N
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
1.3.4 EAPC CONDITIONS
The EAPC (2023) traffic conditions analyses determine the potential near -term cumulative circulation system deficiencies. Background traffic for these analysis scenarios follow the same ambient growth methodology described above for EAP traffic conditions. However, EAPC traffic conditions also include the addition of cumulative development traffic. The comprehensive list of cumulative development projects was compiled from information provided by the City of Rancho Mirage and Cathedral City.
1.3.5 HORIZON YEAR (2040) CONDITIONS
Traffic projections for Horizon Year (2040) with Project conditions were derived from the Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RivTAM) modified to represent buildout of the City of Rancho Mirage. The Horizon Year (2040) conditions analysis will be utilized to determine if improvements funded through regional transportation mitigation fee programs, such as the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) program, or other approved funding mechanisms can accommodate the long-range cumulative traffic at the target level of service (LOS) identified by the City of Rancho Mirage (lead agency).
The Horizon Year (2040) conditions analysis will be utilized to determine if improvements funded through regional transportation mitigation fee programs, such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), or other approved funding mechanism (e.g., Community Facilities District, etc.) can accommodate the long-range cumulative traffic at the target Level of Service (LOS) identified in the City of Rancho Mirage (lead agency) General Plan. Other improvements needed beyond the "funded" improvements (such as localized improvements to non-TUMF) are identified as such. Each of these regional transportation fee programs are discussed in more detail in Section 9 Local and Regional Funding Mechanisms.
1.4 STUDY AREA
The Project study area was defined in coordination with the City of Rancho Mirage. Consistent with County of Riverside traffic study guidelines, the study area includes any intersection of "Collector" or higher classification street, with "Collector" or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. Exhibit 1-2 presents the study area and intersection analysis locations.
The "50 peak hour trip" criteria generally represents a minimum number of trips at which a typical intersection would have the potential to be substantively impacted by a given development proposal. Although each intersection may have unique operating characteristics, this traffic engineering rule of thumb is a widely utilized tool for estimating a potential area of impact (i.e., study area).
To ensure that this TIA satisfies the needs of the City of Rancho Mirage, Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared a Project specific traffic study scoping agreement for review by City staff prior to the preparation of this TIA. The agreement provides an outline of the study area, trip generation, trip distribution, and analysis methodology. The agreement approved by the City of Rancho Mirage is included in Appendix 1.1.
12609-05 Report REV
1244
Cli=t05.1ROAOS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
1.4.1 INTERSECTIONS
The following 3 study area intersections shown on Exhibit 1-2 and listed in Table 1-1 were selected for this TIA based on consultation with City of Rancho Mirage staff. In general, the study area includes intersections where the Project is anticipated to contribute 50 or more peak hour trips, and input from the City of Rancho Mirage staff.
TABLE 1-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS
ID
Intersection Location
Jurisdiction
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
Rancho Mirage
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
Rancho Mirage
3 Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
Rancho Mirage
1.5 ANALYSIS FINDINGS
This section provides a summary of the analysis results for Existing (2019), E+P, EAP (2023), EAPC (2023), and Horizon Year (2040) traffic conditions. A summary of intersection LOS by analysis scenario is sown on Exhibit 1-3.
1.5.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Intersection Operations
For Existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS during the peak hours.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
No study area intersections currently warrant a traffic signal based on peak hour volumes.
Queuing Analysis
A queuing analysis was performed for the study area intersections to assess vehicle queues along the roadways. No intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows.
1.5.2 E+P CONDITIONS
Intersection Operations
The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any deficiencies consistent with Existing traffic conditions.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
No study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal under E+P traffic conditions. 12609-05 Report REV
1245
etiCi IROArYS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 1-2: LOCATION MAP
LEGEND:
0 = EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION
O = FUTURE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION
12609 - locmap.dwg
II2DIII CROSSROADS
URBAN
1246
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 1-3: SUMMARY OF DEFICIENT INTERSECTIONS BY ANALYSIS SCENARIO #
Intersection
Existing (2019)
a
w
EAP (2023)
EAPC (2023)
Horizon Year
(2040)
Without Project
Horizon Year
(2040)
With Project
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
NA
NA
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
()
)
3 Highway 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
.'
�
,
LEGEND:
= AM PEAK HOUR LOS
ri = PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
= LOS A -D
= LOS E
= LOS F
= NOT AN ANALYSIS LOCATION FOR THIS SCENARIO
12609 - sdias.dwg
12, CROSSROADS
URBAN
1247
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
Queuing Analysis
For E+P conditions, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
1.5.3 EAP 2023 Conditions
Intersection Operations
For EAP 2023 conditions, the addition of ambient growth and Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any deficiencies consistent with Existing traffic conditions.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
No study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal under EAP 2023 traffic conditions.
Queuing Analysis
For EAP 2023 conditions, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
1.5.4 EAPC 2023 Conditions
Intersection Operations
For EAPC 2023 conditions, the addition of ambient growth, cumulative projects, and Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any deficiencies consistent with Existing traffic conditions.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
No study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal under EAPC 2023 traffic conditions.
Queuing Analysis
For EAPC 2023 conditions, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the 12609-05 Report REV
1248
1 -URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
1.5.4 Horizon Year (2040) Conditions
Intersection Operations
For Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, no study area intersections are anticipated to operate at unacceptable levels of service. With the addition of Project traffic, no additional study area intersections are anticipated to operate at unacceptable levels of service.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
No study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal under Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project traffic conditions.
Queuing Analysis
No intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday and weekend 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project. With the addition of Project traffic, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
1.6 ON -SITE ROADWAY AND SITE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
The Project is proposed to have access onto the SR -111 at Frank Sinatra Drive. Regional access to the Project site will be provided by the SR -111.
Roadway improvements necessary to provide site access and on -site circulation are assumed to be constructed in conjunction with site development and are described below. These improvements should be in place prior to occupancy.
1.6.1 SITE ADJACENT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The recommended site -adjacent roadway improvements for the Project are described below.
These improvements need to be incorporated into the Project description prior to Project approval or imposed as conditions of approval as part of the Project approval. Exhibit 1-4 illustrates the site adjacent and site access roadway improvement recommendations.
Frank Sinatra Drive is a north -south oriented roadway located along the Project's western boundary. Frank Sinatra Drive appears to be currently constructed at its ultimate full -section 12609-05 Report REV
1249
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
width as a Local Street (60 -foot right-of-way) between the Project's northern and southern boundaries.
1.6.2 SITE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
The recommended site access driveway improvements for the Project are described below.
Exhibit 1-4 also illustrates the on -site and site adjacent recommended intersection lane improvements for Project traffic conditions.
It is recommended that the following improvements be implemented to accommodate Horizon Year (2040) With Project weekend special event 95th percentile traffic flows:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage from 260' to 400' for the NBL movement • Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage from 170' to 250' for the EBL movement The following intersection recommendations represent the minimum lanes that must be provided to achieve acceptable peak hour operations:
Frank Sinatra Drive & Driveway 1 — Construct the intersection with a stop control on the westbound approach and the following geometrics:
• Northbound Approach: One shared through -right turn lane. • Southbound Approach: One shared left -through lane.
• Eastbound Approach: Not Applicable (N/A).
• Westbound Approach: One shared left -right turn lane.
Driveway 2 & Foothill Boulevard — Maintain the existing stop control on the westbound approach and the following existing geometrics:
• Northbound Approach: One left turn lane and one shared through -right turn lane. • Southbound Approach: One left turn lane and one shared through -right turn lane. • Eastbound Approach: One shared left -through -right turn lane. • Westbound Approach: One shared left -through -right turn lane.
On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project site.
Sight distance at each project access point should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans and City of Rancho Mirage sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans.
12609-05 Report REV
1250
CIFICA%5•FEOAOS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Tr affic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 1-4: SITE ADJACENT ROADWAY AND SITE ACCESS REC OMMENDATI ONS LEGEND:
• = STOP SIGN
= EXISTING LANE
= LANE IMPROVEMENT
• •
•
4 416,
,1I el
12609 - recs. dwg
•
to- NIP
•iAr'#*
ON -SITE TRAFFIC SIGNING AND STRIPING SHOULD BE
IMPLEMENTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETAILED
CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT SITE.
SIGHT DISTANCE AT EACH PROJECT ACCESS POINT
SHOULD BE REVIEWED WITH RESPECT TO STANDARD
CALTRANS AND CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE SIGHT
DISTANCE STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION
OF FINAL GRADING, LANDSCAPE AND STREET
IMPROVEMENT PLANS.
FRANK SINATRA DRIVE IS A NORTH -SOUTH ORIENTED
ROADWAY LOCATED ALONG THE PROJECT'S WESTERN
BOUNDARY . FRANK SINATRA DRIVE APPEARS TO BE
CURRENTLY CONSTRUCTED AT ITS ULTIMATE
FULL -SECTION WIDTH AS A LOCAL STREET (60 -FOOT
RIGHT-OF-WAY) BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S NORTHERN
AND SOUTHERN BOUNDARIES .
Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
Frank Sinatra Dr . &
Dwy. 2
lej, CROS SROADS
UR BAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
1.7 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
The intersection sight distance has been evaluated for Driveway 1 and Driveway 2 on Frank Sinatra Drive. As defined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Highway Design Manual, sight distance is the continuous length of highway ahead visible to the driver.
At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. For the purposes of this analysis, a 7 1/2 second criterion has been applied to the outside travel lanes in either direction to provide the most conservative sight distance.
The 7 % second criterion allows waiting vehicles to either cross all lanes of through traffic by turning left or cross the near lanes by turning right without requiring through traffic to radically alter their speed.
Adequate visibility for vehicular and pedestrian traffic can be provided at each Project driveway by limiting sight obstructions within the limited use area. Any landscaping/hardscape within the limited use area should not exceed 30 -inches (2.5 -feet) in height. The limited use area should be kept clear of any landscaping or any other obstructions that may impede the visibility of the driver, including on -street parking. Minimum corner sight distance for the Project driveways is illustrated on Exhibit 1-5, however, sight distance should be re-evaluated once the driveway has been constructed.
1.8 SPECIAL EVENT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
It is recommended that the Project applicant coordinate with the City staff to refine the traffic management plan prior to the Special Event. Exhibit 1-6 shows a high-level event operations planning. (3)
Special event flaggers, law enforcement personnel, and portable changeable message signs (CMS) are recommended to facilitate the movement of special event traffic, shuttles and pedestrians.
1.8.1 CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS
Portable changeable message signs (CMS) are recommended along the major routes of Highway 111 and Frank Sinatra Drive in order to facilitate guests to and from the on -site and off -site parking.
1.8.2 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS/EVENT FLAGGERS
Law enforcement personnel and/or special event flaggers are recommended to direct traffic at the following key locations:
• Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
• Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
12609-05 Report REV
1252
URBAI' S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Project Traffic Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 1-5: SIGHT DISTANCE
LEGEND:
• MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCE LINES
= LIMITED USE AREA
(THERE SHALL BE NO OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE LIMITED USE AREA.
OBSTRUCTIONS INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY SIGNS OR OBJECTS HIGHER THAN 2.5' MEASURED FROM PAVEMENT WITHIN THE AREA OF LIMITED USE.) 12609 - sight distance.dwg
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 60 120
I I I
1"=120'
OURBAN
CROSSROAC,S
1253
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 1-6: EVENT OPERATIONS PLANNING SCHEDULE
Perform Situation Analysis and
Risk Assessanent
•
Landuct Public. Uutroch
EVENT OPERATIONS PLANNING TIMELINE- .
Reetin-q on
Event Concept
and Review Past
Lessorrs Learned
•
Submit Permit
Application
•
Develop Thn:il Plan
.
Develop Travel Demand Management Initaai s
•
LstabLish Palicies and Agreements
•
Meeting or
Traffic Manayernerrf.
Ilan Requirements
Flea :ring with
Public to
Assess Needs
Approve
Mithaatian
•
Marring on
Traffic Management
Plan Review
•
Issue Permit
ARQravat
•
Athance to
tmylementatt'ur
Prtl^vitlES
DAYS
Event
Source: Managing Travel for Planned Special Events Handbook: Executive Summary (June 2007) prepared by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
1.8.3 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS
Public service announcements (PSA) are recommended to provide information to event guests prior to the event. Examples include, but are not limited to:
• Online event information (i.e., suggested routes, parking, etc.) • CMS prior to the event
• Brochures
1.8.4 SIGNAL TIMING ADJUSTMENTS
Coordinate with the City staff to provide traffic signal timing adjustment based on the expected peak arrival and departure periods of the special event at the following intersections:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
1.8.5 PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
The recent rise in popularity of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) such as Uber and Lyft, has the potential to significantly change future parking demands. The TNC or ridesharing model, in which users can request rides through their smartphones, provides on -demand transportation in personal vehicles with direct point-to-point trips. The use rather than ownership model of TNCs may over time substantially reduce the need for dedicated parking. In addition, on -demand 12609-05 Report REV
1254
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
transportation increases the need to promote accessible drop-off and pick-up areas. Recognizing increased parking demand during special events, the following parking management strategies should be considered:
• Drop-off and Pick-up areas: Provide convenient and accessible drop-off and pick-up areas to promote ridesharing and reduce parking demands. In addition, the Project applicant may consider providing short-term parking with time restrictions of 10-15 minutes to provide staging areas for ridesharing vehicles.
• Off -site Employee Parking: To maximize the available on -site parking supply, employees should park off -site. According to the parking ratios published by ULI, employees can account for approximately 25% of the available parking supply. Providing off -site parking facilities with convenient shuttle service to bring employees to and from an off -site facility during special events can substantially increase the available of on -site parking supply. • Valet Parking: Implementation of valet parking during special events can substantially increase the available on -site parking capacity. In addition, valet parking will also provide for convenient accessible parking special events.
12609-05 Report REV
1255
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1256
'► URBAN
C IRC➢44RC L S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
2 METHODOLOGIES
This section documents the methodologies and assumptions used to perform this traffic assessment.
2.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE
Traffic operations of roadway facilities are described using the term "Level of Service" (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are typically defined ranging from LOS A, representing completely free -flow conditions, to LOS F, representing breakdown in flow resulting in stop -and -go conditions. LOS E represents operations at or near capacity, an unstable level where vehicles are operating with the minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow.
2.2 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
The definitions of LOS for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control.
The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway.
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. (4) The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control.
2.2.1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
The City of Rancho Mirage require signalized intersection operations analysis based on the methodology described in the HCM 6th Edition (4). Intersection LOS operations are based on an intersection's average control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. For signalized intersections LOS is directly related to the average control delay per vehicle and is correlated to a LOS designation as described in Table 2-1.
TABLE 2-1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION OF LOS
Description
Average Control
Delay (Seconds),
V/C ≤ 1.0
Level of Service,
V/C ≤ 1.0
Level of Service,
V/C > 1.0
Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length.
0 to 10.00
A
F
Operations with low delay occurring with good
progression and/or short cycle lengths.
10.01 to 20.00
B
F
Operations with average delays resulting from fair
progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear.
20.01 to 35.00
C
F
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C
35.01 to 55.00
D
F
12609-05 Report REV
1257
CoD.URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
Operations with high delay values indicating poor
progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios.
Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.
55.01 to 80.00
E
F
Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers
occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths
80.01 and up
F
F
Source: HCM 6th Edition
Equations are used to determine measures of effectiveness such as delay and queue length. The level of service and capacity analysis performed by Synchro takes into consideration optimization and coordination of signalized intersections within a network. All signalized study area intersections have also utilized the Synchro software.
The peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted using a peak hour factor (PHF) to reflect peak 15 minute volumes. Common practice for LOS analysis is to use a peak 15 -minute rate of flow.
However, flow rates are typically expressed in vehicles per hour. The PHF is the relationship between the peak 15 -minute flow rate and the full hourly volume (e.g. PHF = [Hourly Volume] / [4 x Peak 15 -minute Flow Rate]). The use of a 15 -minute PHF produces a more detailed analysis as compared to analyzing vehicles per hour. Existing PHFs have been used for all analysis scenarios. Per Chapter 4 of the HCM 6th Edition, PHF values over 0.95 often are indicative of high traffic volumes with capacity constraints on peak hour flows while lower PHF values are indicative of greater variability of flow during the peak hour. (7)
2.2.2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
The City of Rancho Mirage require the operations of unsignalized intersections be evaluated using the methodology described in the HCM 6th Edition. (4) The LOS rating is based on the weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle (see Table 2-2).
TABLE 2-2: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DESCRIPTION OF LOS Description
Average Control Delay Per
Vehicle (Seconds)
Level of Service,
V/C ≤ 1.0
Level of Service,
V/C > 1.0
Little or no delays.
0 to 10.00
A
F
Short traffic delays.
10.01 to 15.00
B
F
Average traffic delays.
15.01 to 25.00
C
F
Long traffic delays.
25.01 to 35.00
D
F
Very long traffic delays.
35.01 to 50.00
E
F
Extreme traffic delays with
intersection capacity exceeded.
> 50.00
F
F
Source: HCM 6th Edition
At two-way or side -street stop -controlled intersections, LOS is calculated for each controlled movement and for the left turn movement from the major street, as well as for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the delay is computed as the average of 12609-05 Report REV
1258
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
all movements in that lane. For all -way stop controlled intersections, LOS is computed for the intersection as a whole.
2.3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
The term "signal warrants" refers to the list of established criteria used by Caltrans and other public agencies to quantitatively justify or ascertain the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection. This TIA uses the signal warrant criteria presented in the latest edition of the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), for all study area intersections. (5) The signal warrant criteria for Existing conditions are based upon several factors, including volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, frequency of accidents, and location of school areas.
The CAMUTCD indicates that the installation of a traffic signal should be considered if one or more of the signal warrants are met. (5) Specifically, this TIA utilizes the Peak Hour Volume - based Warrant 3 as the appropriate representative traffic signal warrant analysis for existing study area intersections for all analysis scenarios. Warrant 3 is appropriate to use for this TIA because it provides specialized warrant criteria for intersections with rural characteristics (e.g. located in communities with populations of less than 10,000 persons or with adjacent major streets operating above 40 miles per hour). For the purposes of this study, the speed limit was the basis for determining whether Urban or Rural warrants were used for a given intersection.
Future intersections that do not currently exist have been assessed regarding the potential need for new traffic signals based on future average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, using the Caltrans planning level ADT-based signal warrant analysis worksheets.
Traffic signal warrant analyses were performed for all of the following unsignalized study area intersections (see Table 2-3):
TABLE 2-3: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOCATIONS
ID
Intersection Location
1 Frank Sinatra Drive & Driveway 1
2 Frank Sinatra Drive & Driveway 2
The Existing conditions traffic signal warrant analysis is presented in the subsequent section, Section 3 Existing Conditions of this report. The traffic signal warrant analysis for future conditions is presented Section 5 E+P Traffic Analysis, Section 6 EAP (2023) Traffic Analysis, Section 7 EAPC (2023) Traffic Analysis, and Section 8 Horizon Year (2040) Traffic Analysis of this report.
It is important to note that a signal warrant defines the minimum condition under which the installation of a traffic signal might be warranted. Meeting this condition does not require that a traffic control signal be installed at a particular location, but rather, that other traffic factors and conditions be evaluated in order to determine whether the signal is truly justified. It should also be noted that signal warrants do not necessarily correlate with LOS. An intersection may 12609-05 Report REV
1259
cwrass•ticiAos
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
satisfy a signal warrant condition and operate at or above acceptable LOS or operate below acceptable LOS and not meet a signal warrant.
2.4 QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis has been conducted for all intersections and Project driveways. The 95th percentile queuing of vehicles has been assessed along these roadways to determine potential queuing issues at the intersections.
The traffic progression analysis tool and HCM intersection analysis program, Synchro, has been used to assess the potential impacts/needs of the intersections with traffic added from the proposed Project. The 50th percentile maximum queue is the maximum back of queue on a typical cycle during the peak hour, while the 95th percentile queue is the maximum back of queue with 95th percentile traffic volumes during the peak hour. In other words, if traffic were observed for 100 cycles, the 95th percentile queue would be the queue experienced with the 95th busiest cycle (or 5% of the time). The 50th percentile or average queue represents the typical queue length for peak hour traffic conditions, while the 95th percentile queue is derived from the average queue plus 1.65 standard deviations. The 95th percentile queue is not necessarily ever observed; it is simply based on statistical calculations.
2.5 MINIMUM LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
Per Goal 1, Policy 1 of the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the following LOS will be utilized for study area intersections located within the City: Require development to achieve a peak hour LOS D or better at intersections and roadway segments.
2.6 DEFICIENCY CRITERIA
To determine whether the addition of project traffic at a study intersection would result in a deficiency, the following will be utilized:
• A deficiency occurs at study area intersections if the pre -Project condition is at or better than LOS D (i.e., acceptable LOS), and the addition of project trips causes the peak hour LOS of the study area intersection to operate at unacceptable LOS (i.e., LOS E or F). Per the County of Riverside traffic study guidelines, for intersections currently operating at unacceptable LOS (LOS E or F), a deficiency would occur if the Project contributes 50 or more peak hour trips to pre -project traffic conditions.
12609-05 Report REV
1260
"r URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
3 AREA CONDITIONS
This section provides a summary of the existing circulation network, the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Circulation Network, and a review of existing peak hour intersection operations, traffic signal warrant, and queuing analyses.
3.1 EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK
The study area includes a total of 3 intersections as shown previously on Exhibit 1-1. Exhibit 3-1 illustrates the study area intersections and identifies the number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and intersection traffic controls.
3.2 CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT Exhibit 3-2 shows the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Circulation Element, and Exhibit 3-3 illustrates the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan roadway cross -sections.
A brief description of each roadway including existing and planned roadway width is provided below:
Frank Sinatra Drive is an east -west major collector running through the City of Rancho Mirage.
Most of Frank Sinatra Drive is constructed to its ultimate design standards with a 100 -foot right- of-way. However, Frank Sinatra Drive, west of Highway 111, is designated as a two lane roadway in the General Plan.
Highway 111 is the major arterial connecting most of the commercial centers of the Coachella Valley. As a major arterial, the route runs north-west to south-east diagonally within the study area. Highway 111 provides three through travel lanes in each direction. Highway 111 is designated as a Riverside County CMP roadway.
3.3 TRUCK ROUTES
The City of Rancho Mirage designated truck route map is shown on Exhibit 3-4. Highway 111 is identified as designated truck route.
3.4 TRANSIT SERVICE
The City of Rancho Mirage and is currently served by the SunLine Transit Agency (STA), a public transit agency serving various jurisdictions throughout Coachella Valley. The existing bus routes provided within the City are shown on Exhibit 3-5. Transit service is reviewed and updated by STA periodically to address ridership, budget and community demand needs. Changes in land use can affect these periodic adjustments which may lead to either enhanced or reduced service where appropriate. It should also be noted that SunDial service provides special services for the disabled and seniors (60+).
12609-05 Report REV
1261
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-1: EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS
CATHEDRAL CITY
er
30 FRANK SINATRA DR.
(+� SITE
0 DWY.2
. �*
l
I�.
ti
so
30 2U
RANCHO MIRAGE
4D
p
741.
35 : 4411
AiO•II•�
It1'IJ� '_
�►� !$ 4,4
*1116110 aff
•
SAL
ore-Rirt-41*"lik 06,111
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
Future
Intersection
2 Frank
-*
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
el
-
3 Frank
L.L.-
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
4 f —
I
_
LEGEND:
4 D
U
25 = TRAFFIC SIGNAL
= STOP SIGN
= NUMBER OF LANES
• DIVIDED
= UNDIVIDED
= CHANNELIZED YIELD
= SPEED LIMIT (MPH)
12609 - icon.dwg
URBAN
1262
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-2: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT Circulation Roadway Plan
Q Critical Intersections
City Roadways
Major Arterial (6D)
Minor Arterial (4D)
_ Minor Arterial (4D)
(Conceptual Alignment)
Major Collector (4D)
5D - Six -lane Divided Roadway
4D - Four -fond divided Roadway
City Limits
Sphere of Influence
Source: Riverside County, 2016; City of Rancho
Mirage, 2016.
Conceptual_
Alignment
SITE
Ramon Rd
Dinah Shore Dr
o`
r
c
Q
Gerald Ford Dr
Frank Sinatra Dr
1 1. 1 1 I j '
Country Club Dr
Rancho Las Palmas Dr
Conceptual
Alignment
v
c
o
12609 - gpce.dwg
Iri:2! CROSSROADS
URBAN
1263
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-3: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN STREET CROSS SECTIONS Major Arterial*
(Six Lanes divided, no parking)
*Highway 111 has special design geometrics, See Rancho Mirage Highway 111 Alignment Study, 1996.
Minor Arterial
(Four Lanes divided, w/bike lane/no parking)
Major Collector
(Four Lanes divided, w/bike lane/no parking)
Minor Collector
(Four Lanes undivided, w/parking)
Local
60'
10' [ 8' 12' 12' 8' [ 10'
(Two Lanes, w/parking)
12609 - cross-sections.dwg
C!!ii CROSSROADS
URBAN
1264
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-4: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED TRUCK ROUTES Designated Truck Routes
• • • I Time Restricted Truck Routes
F-1 City Limits
r
r Sphere of Influence
Suora,, flfrenWe County. 2016:
Esrl Wald Imagery, 2017
Ramon Rd
v
6 Dinah Shore br
•••••••••iiii
SITE
te-
irtk
a
o
Gerald Ford Dr
1 Alf
.. --r 11 w
10/111
j . •, t '
Frank Sinatra Dr •
Country Club Dr
12609 - trucks.dwg
C!, CROSSROAIS
URBAN
1265
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-5: EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES
B
FRANK SINATRA DR.
_ SITE
I /® DWY.2 .?I�
�® 0L4/}.
' rJ
I
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
= SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY ROUTE 111 B = BUS STOP
12609 - transit.dwg
12, CROSSROADS
URBAN
1266
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
3.5 BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities within City are shown on Exhibit 3-6. The General Plan identifies that Pedestrian and other non -motor circulation is encouraged in the City wherever possible.
3.6 EXISTING (2019) TRAFFIC COUNTS
The intersection LOS analysis is based on the traffic volumes observed during the peak hour conditions using traffic count data collected in December 2019. The following peak hours were selected for analysis:
• Weekday AM Peak Hour (peak hour between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM) • Weekday PM Peak Hour (peak hour between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM) • Saturday Mid -day Peak Hour (peak hour between 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM) The weekday AM, weekday PM, and Saturday mid -day peak hour count data is representative of typical peak hour traffic conditions in the study area. There were no observations made in the field that would indicate atypical traffic conditions on the count dates, such as construction activity or detour routes and near -by schools were in session and operating on normal schedules.
The raw manual peak hour turning movement traffic count data sheets are included in Appendix
3.1. These raw turning volumes have been flow conserved between intersections with limited access, no access and where there are currently no uses generating traffic.
Existing weekday average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on arterial highways throughout the study area are shown on Exhibit 3-7. Existing ADT volumes are based upon factored intersection peak hour counts collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. using the following formula for each intersection leg:
Weekday PM Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 6.23 = Leg Volume A comparison of the PM peak hour and daily traffic volumes of various roadway segments within the study area indicated that the peak -to -daily relationship is approximately 16.06 percent. As such, the above equation utilizing a factor of 6.23 estimates the ADT volumes on the study area roadway segments assuming a peak -to -daily relationship of approximately 16.06 percent (i.e., 1/0.01606 = 6.23) and was assumed to sufficiently estimate average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for planning -level analyses. Existing weekday AM and weekday PM intersection volumes are shown on Exhibit 3-7, and Saturday peak hour intersection volumes are shown on Exhibit 3-8. 12609-05 Report REV
1267
URBAN
CR.u%5R[7A O5
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-6: EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
4 B
CATHEDRAL CITY
LEGEND:
FRANK SINATRA DR.
SITE
/ - DWY. 2 �N
O1/y•
' J
2 RANCHO MIRAGE
B
0 O
= SIDEWALK
= CROSSWALK ON TWO APPROACHES
= BUS STOP
= NO CROSSWALK
= FUTURE INTERSECTION
1 2
3 = BIGHORN OVERLOOK TRAIL
= JACK RABBIT TRAIL
= CHUCKWALLA TRIAL
12609 - peds.dwg
4 = ROAD RUNNER TRAIL
12, CROSSROADS
URBAN
1268
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-7: EXISTING (2019) WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY 46
er
FRANK SINATRA DR.
03 0.5 SITE
h 'O- DWY. 2
/0/
°w
I�.
RANCHO MIRAGE
14.5 1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
Future
Intersection
2 Frank
N
o m —IN
i l,
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
'-15(8)
—0(4) m
f—0(0)
3 Frank
N
N C
a —CO
- CO"'
.7- N
j 4 l,.f-260(149)
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
'-362(301)
55(30)
0(16)
t ('
14(33)-
35(32)-*
714(1193)-.-
87(174)-*
1(2)-
0 0 0
20(51)-
1(0)-
t- n o
17(24)
LEGEND:
10.0 = ACTUAL (COUNT -BASED) VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
10.0 - ESTIMATED VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
Iri:2! CROSSROADS
URBAN
1269
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-8: EXISTING (2019) SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
er
CATHEDRAL CITY
SITE
.0 DWY.2 �*
l
RANCHO MIRAGE
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Highway 111 &
Frank Sinatra Dr.
4-27
Z co
4-160
Future
Intersection
m m
--1
—o
m .7- °r
--28
X141
1-47
t r"
19-41
0--
O N m
42--
4 o m
anrn
0-
11 -t
LEGEND:
10 = SATURDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1270
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
3.7 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Existing peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis of this report. The intersection operations analysis results are summarized in Table 3-1 which indicates that all existing study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS D or better) during one or more of the peak hours.
Consistent with Table 3-1, a summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for Existing conditions are shown on Exhibit 3-9. The intersection operations analysis worksheets are included in Appendix 3.2 of this TIA.
3.8 EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrants for Existing traffic conditions are based on existing peak hour intersection turning volumes. For Existing (2019) traffic conditions, no existing study area intersections appear to currently warrant a traffic signal based on peak hour traffic flows (see Appendix 3.3).
3.9 QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis was performed for study area intersection to assess vehicle queues along the roadways. Existing (2019) queuing analysis findings are presented in Table 3-2.
As shown on Table 3-2, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows.
Worksheets for Existing (2019) conditions queuing analysis are provided in Appendix 3.4. 12609-05 Report REV
1271
'► URBAN
C R2 ACA S4R C7R[JS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3-9: EXISTING (2019) SUMMARY OF LOS
CATHEDRAL CITY
FRANK SINATRA DR.
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
(J _; = AM PEAK HOUR LOS
T = PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
= LOS A•D
= LOS E
® = LOS F
= NOT AN ANALYSIS LOCATION FOR THIS SCENARIO
12609 - los.dwg
12, CROSSROADS
URBAN
1272
Table 3-1
Intersecti on Analysis f or Existing (2019) Conditi ons #
Intersection
Traffic
Control3
Intersection Approach Lanes'
Delay2 (secs .)
Le vel of Ser vice
Northbound
Southb ound
Eastbound
Westbound
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
SAT
L T R
L T R
L T R
L T R
AM
PM
AM
PM
1 2
3 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr .
CSS
TS
1 1 0
1 3 1
Future Intersection
1 1 0
2 3 1
0 1 0
1 1 0
0 1 0
2 1 1
9 .0
19 .9
9.4 19 .2
9 .7
18.1 A
B
A
B
A
B
When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped . To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes.
L = Left; T = Thro ugh; R = Right
2 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control .
For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3 CSS = Cross -street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal
Lam► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Table 3-2
Peak Hour Queuing Summary for Existing (2019) Conditions Intersection
Movement
Available Stacking
Distance (Feet)
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
AM
PM
SAT
AM
PM
SAT
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
Future Intersection
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
SBL
220
0 10
10 Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
200
34 28
45 Yes
Yes
Yes
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
NBL
260
66 59
82 Yes
Yes
Yes
SBR
300
0 0
0 Yes
Yes
Yes
EBL
170
35 60
43 Yes
Yes
Yes
EBT/R
270
41 74
51 Yes
Yes
Yes
1 Stacking Distance is acceptable if the required stacking distance is less than or equal to the stacking distance provided. An additional 15 feet of stacking which is assumed to be provided in the transition for turn pockets is reflected in the stacking distance shown on this table, where applicable. 2 Maximum queue length for the approach reported.
��► URBAN
1274
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
4 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC
This section presents the traffic volumes estimated to be generated by the Project, as well as the Project's trip assignment onto the study area roadway network.
It is our understanding that the Project is to expand the existing Ritz -Carlton hotel by 106 residential dwelling units, a 6,966 restaurant, and a 23,843 square foot venue. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the Project will be constructed within a single phase of development with a projected Opening Year of 2023.
Access to the Project site will be provided via the following roadways:
• Frank Sinatra Drive on SR -111 (full access)
Regional access to the project site is provided via the SR -111 at Frank Sinatra Drive.
4.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to and produced by the specific land uses being proposed for a given development.
Weekday trip generation rates used to estimate Project traffic and a summary of the Project's weekday trip generation are shown in Table 4-1. The weekend special event trip generation summary is shown in Table 4-2. The trip generation rates are based upon data collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (ITE Land Use Code 220) and Quality Restaurant (ITE Land Use Code 931) land uses in their published Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. (2) The ITE Trip Generation Manual does not provide trip generation rates for a venue since the use is very specific. As such, vehicle trips are calculated based on a maximum allowable occupancy of 0.8 per parking space.
As shown on Table 4-1, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate a net total of 1,068 trip - ends per day, 51 AM peak hour trips and 86 PM peak hour trips.
It should be noted that the venue will generate trips outside the weekday AM and PM peak hours.
As shown on Table 4-2, the proposed Project (special event) is anticipated to generate a net total of 416 weekend peak hour trips.
4.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The trip distribution patterns for the proposed Project are graphically depicted on Exhibit 4-1.
The trip distributions have been developed based on past work experience in the vicinity of the Project site and refined to reflect the roadway network and the surrounding uses in the vicinity of the proposed Project as they exist today.
12609-05 Report REV
1275
URBAN
Table 4-1
Project Trip Generation Summary - Typical Operations
Land Use
ITE LU
Code
Units2
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Rates:'
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
220
DU
0.11 0.35
0.46 0.35
0.21 0.56
7.32 Quality Restaurant
931
TSF
0.49 0.24
0.73 5.23
2.57 7.80
83.84 Land Use
Quantity
Units2
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Summary:
Ritz -Carlton Residences
106
DU
11 38
49 37
22 59
776
Sky Mesa Restaurant
6.966
TSF
3 2
5 36
18 54
586
Internal Capture (50%)3
-2
-1
-3
-18
-9
-27
-294
Total
12 39
51 55
31 86
1,068
Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE),Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). 2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Internal capture reduction of 50% has been applied as a significant portion of the patrons would be internal to the existing hotel. 1276
( URBAN
CROSSROAC.S
Table 4-2
Project Trip Generation Summary - Weekend Special Event Land Use
ITE LU
Code
Units2
Arrival Peak Hour
Departure Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Rates:'
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
220
DU
0.35 0.35
0.70 0.35
0.35 0.70
Quality Restaurant
931
TSF
6.30 4.38
10.68 6.30
4.38 10.68
Venue
Not Available
Land Use
Quantity
Units2
Arrival Peak Hour
Departure Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Summary:
Ritz -Carlton Residences
106
DU
37 37
74 37
37 74
Sky Mesa Restaurant
6.966
TSF
44 31
75 44
31 75
Internal Capture (50%)3
-22
-16
-38
-22
-16
-38
Venue4
381
Spaces
295
10 305
10 295
305
Total
354
62 416
69 347
416
1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE),Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). 2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Internal capture reduction of 50% has been applied as a significant portion of the patrons would be internal to the existing hotel.
4 Vehicle trips are calculated based on a maximum allowable occupancy of 0.8 per parking space. 1277
( URBAN
CROSSROAC.S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 4-1: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CATHEDRAL CITY
FRANK SINATRA DR.
LEGEND:
RANCHO MIRAGE
35 10 = PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT
12609 - trip.dwg
OURBAN
CROSSROAC.S
1278
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
4.3 MODAL SPLIT
Although the use of public transit, walking, and/or bicycling have the potential to reduce Project - related traffic, such reductions have not been taken into considerations in this traffic study in order to provide a conservative analysis of the Project's potential to contribute to circulation system deficiencies.
4.4 TRIP ASSIGNMENT
The assignment of traffic from the Project area to the adjoining roadway system is based upon the Project trip generation, trip distribution, and the arterial highway and local street system improvements that would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the Project. Based on the identified Project traffic generation and trip distribution patterns, Project weekday ADT, weekday AM peak hour, and weekday PM peak hour peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-2. Project (Special Event) weekend arrival and departure peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-3.
4.5 CUMULATIVE GROWTH TRAFFIC
4.5.1 AMBIENT GROWTH RATE
Future year traffic forecasts have been based upon background (ambient) growth at 8.24 percent (2 percent per year over 4 years) for EAP and EAPC traffic conditions. The ambient growth factor is intended to approximate regional traffic growth. This ambient growth rate is added to existing traffic volumes to account for area -wide growth not reflected by cumulative development projects. Ambient growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the development of future projects that have been approved but not yet built and/or for which development applications have been filed and are under consideration by governing agencies, for EAPC traffic conditions.
4.5.2 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines require that other reasonably foreseeable development projects which are either approved or being processed concurrently in the study area also be included as part of a cumulative analysis scenario. A cumulative project list was developed for the purposes of this analysis through consultation with planning and engineering staff from the City of Rancho Mirage.
Exhibit 4-3 illustrates the cumulative development location map. A summary of cumulative development projects and their proposed land uses are shown on Table 4-3. If applicable, the traffic generated by individual cumulative projects was manually added to the Opening Year Cumulative forecasts to ensure that traffic generated by the listed cumulative development projects in Table 4-3 are reflected as part of the background traffic. Trip generation rates used to estimate cumulative development project traffic and a summary of the cumulative development project's weekday trip generation are shown in Table 4-4. 12609-05 Report REV
1279
URBArYS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 4-2: PROJECT ONLY WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
4,01411.
FRANK SINATRA DR.
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Highway 111 &
Frank Sinatra Dr.
�o(o)
X0(0)
o —
,-39(31)
,15,-e4 .
.-0(0)
moo
X4(19)
L.
f —o(0)
�1 ,i 1.
f —o(0)
,1 ) 1.
*—o(0)
r-
0(0)—#
1 t r"
70(8)-4
1 t r-
00 0(0)—
o.-0
14(11)—
r700
0 0
0(0)-*
0 0
m
16(12)
N IN 0 0
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 m VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1280
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 4-3: PROJECT ONLY SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
er
FRANK SINATRA DR.
RANCHO MIRAGE
1 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Frank
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
o a
o' o
X0(0)
,.- o
'-0(0)
-- m
62(347)
"' '
-*-0(0)
m ;57l;
124(24)
i 1.
X0(0)
i 1.
f-0(0)
.1 i r.
I-0(0)
f [-
0(0)-
0(0)-
62(347)-.-
0(0)-t
16(87)-4
1 t r"
O a
0(0)—
22(121)- -
S'O'S
0 0
0(0)-
25(139)
N o 0
e
LEGEND:
10(10) = ARRIVAL(DEPARTURE) PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1281
CROSSROADS
Rr't2-C'ur$tari Residences Traffic l rryfled ANO f ysxs EXHIBIT 4- : CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP
Elms
RMR
t
Pica
PMI
yyw,, �p
Source, Efn Lriga Geb GecEyo, Earthstar� toq'r# 9r� 31d' CNE J irlus Lt USLtA USGS araifipbfAtAtier
Cofnrrtuirlty, Sodrces -tEP.r Gartrun Irrterrnap, tticrernerr P oip, GEBC0I, SCS, FAO, 1+I PS, h1RrLAdl, LeooBase, ICiC+I Kadaster NL' Ordnance Survey, Esri.Japan. F+iETI. Esr China (I -long Kong}, (c) Ope'n5treetMap cronttib tors i.gci The e' ,5 IJse Corn uniw 226og d. rrrytd
1282
ICD w
CW +'o-SFc
Table 4-3
Cumulative Development Land Use Summary
TAZ
Project
Case Number
Land Use
Quantity
Unitsl
City of Rancho Mirage
RM1
RM 38 JV LLC
DA190002 / TTM36620
Residential
82 DU
RM2
Carefield Senior Living
PDP18004 / DA180003 / EA180002
Residential
84 DU
RM3
ECHO at Rancho Mirage
PDP18003
Residential
9 DU
RM4
Santa Barbara Cove Estates
PDP18001 / TTM35573
Residential
20 DU
RM5
Pulte Homes/ Del Webb
PDP17001 / TTM36809
Residential
1,200
DU
RM6
Veneto
MOD16019
Residential
34 DU
RM7
Revelle
PDP13003 / FDP13004
Residential
32 DU
RM8
Bella Clancy
ZTA05003 / EA050025 / MOD05016 / FDP04002 / PDP03015
Residential
20 DU
RM9
Mirada Villas
FDP05004 / PDP04011 / MOD06024 / MOD11040
Residential
46 DU
RM10
Estilo
PDP12003 / FDP12005
Residential
39 DU
RM11
RM Five -1 LLC/Kilani
TPM37222R / EA190008
Residential
4 DU
RM12
Heinrich/Steinberg
TPM34232 / TPPMX34232 / TPM34233 / TPMX34233
Residential
4 DU
RM13
Rancho Mirage LLC
TPM34741 / EA060009 / TPMX-34741 / PDPX34741
Residential
4 DU
RM14
La Paloma Homes, Inc.
TTM37637
Residential
13 DU
RM15
Monterey Medical Center
TTM37703 / PDP17002
Medical Office
75.164
TSF
RM16
38 JV, LLC c/o Meriwether Companies
TTM36621 / EA130007 / TTM3X36621
Residential
10 DU
RM17
38 JV, LLC c/o Meriwether Companies
TTM36620 / EA130006 / SPA13001 / TTM2X36620
Residential
97 DU
RM18
38 JV, LLC c/o Meriwether Companies
TTM36622 / EA130008 / TTM3X36622
Residential
10 DU
RM19
GRV Mirage, LLC (ECHO)
TTM35619 / EA070011
Residential
9 DU
RM20
Ken Catanzarite
TTM35573
Residential
20 DU
RM21
Miragedunes Properties
TTM05004 / TTM33329 /TTM2X33329
Residential
9 DU
RM22
AMS Development Group (Bellavia)
TTM35089
Residential
18 DU
RM23
IN -N -OUT Burgers
PDP19002 / EA190004 / CUP19007 / ZTA19002 / DA190001
Commercial
3.995
DU
RM24
DHO Medical Office Building
PDP19001 / EA190001
Medical Office
13.800
TSF
RM25
Chase Bank
PDP18005
Bank
3.470
TSF
RM26
Section 31 Specific Plan Project
SP180001 / EIR18001 / GPZMA18003
Hotel
400
Rooms
Commercial
175.000
TSF
Residential
1,932
DU
RM27
Tower Energy Group
CUP18004 / TPM37486 / EA180004
Commercial
5.565
TSF
RM28
Oasis Ranch LLC
PDP18002 / TTM37461
Hotel
60 Rooms
Residential
108
DU
RM29
Horizon Pacific Rancho Cove
MSA Consulting
PDP16003 / TTM37122
Commercial
20.000
TSF
Hotel
100
Rooms
Residential
35 DU
RM30
Hazelden Betty Ford Center
--
Hospital
56 Beds
Office
6.399
TSF
Cathedral City
CC1
Grove @ The Edge
Commercial
--
TSF
Hotel
100
Rooms
Residential
--
DU
CC2
Cathedral City Senior Living ICUP 16-051
Residential
140
DU
DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
1283
( URBAN
CROSSROADS
Table 4-4
Cumulative Development Project Trip Generation Summary
Land Use
ITE LU
Code
Units2
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
SAT Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Rates:'
Single -Family Detached Housing
210
DU
0.19 0.56
0.74 0.62
0.37 0.99
9.44 0.50
0.43 0.93
Hotel
310
Rooms
0.28 0.19
0.47 0.31
0.29 0.60
8.36 0.40
0.32 0.72
Shopping Center
820
TSF
0.58 0.36
0.94 1.83
1.98 3.81
37.75 2.34
2.16 4.50
Land Use
Quantity
Units2
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
SAT Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Summary:
Mirada Villas - SFDU (75% Built)
9 DU
2 5
7 6
3 9
86 5
4 9
Horizon Pacific Rancho Cove MSA Consulting
Commercial
20.000
TSF
12 7
19 37
40 77
756
47 43
90 Hotel
100
Rooms
28 19
47 31
29 60
836
40 32
72 SFDU
35 DU
6 19
25 22
13 35
332
18 15
33 Total
46 45
91 90
82 172
1,924
105
90 195
Ken Catanzarite - SFDU
20 DU
4 11
15 12
7 19
190
10 9
19 Santa Barbara Cove Estates - SFDU
20 DU
4 11
15 12
7 19
190
10 9
19 Total
8 22
30 24
14 38
380
20 18
38 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). 2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
1284
ei URBAN
CROSSROAC+S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
Cumulative development project weekday ADT, weekday AM peak hour, and weekday PM peak hour peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-5. Cumulative development project weekend peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-6.
4.5.3 NEAR -TERM TRAFFIC FORECASTS
The "buildup" approach combines existing traffic counts with a background ambient growth factor to forecast EAP (2023) and EAPC (2023) traffic conditions. An ambient growth factor of 2% per year accounts for background (area -wide) traffic increases that occur over time up to the year 2023 from the year 2019 (compounded 2% per year growth over a 4 -year period). Project traffic is added to assess both forecast EAP (2023) and EAPC (2023) traffic conditions. Traffic volumes generated by cumulative development projects are not included in the EAP (2023) traffic conditions.
The near -term traffic analysis includes the following traffic conditions, with the various traffic components:
• EAP (2023)
o Existing 2019 volumes
o Ambient growth traffic (8.24%)
o Typical Weekday or Saturday Special Event Project Traffic • EAPC (2023)
o Existing 2019 volumes
o Ambient growth traffic (8.24%)
o Cumulative Development traffic
o Typical Weekday or Saturday Special Event Project Traffic The currently adopted Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2016 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) / Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) (April 2016) growth forecasts for the City of Rancho Mirage identifies projected growth in population of 49,800 in 2012 to 61,700 in 2040, or a 23.90 percent increase over the 28 -year period. (6) The change in population equates to roughly a 0.77 percent annual growth rate, compounded annually. Similarly, growth over the same 28 -year period in households is projected to increase by 34.19 percent, or a 1.06 percent annual growth rate. Finally, growth in employment over the same 28 -year period is projected to increase by 45.26 percent, or a 1.34 percent annual growth rate. The average growth rate is 1.34%, compounded annually between Year 2012 and Year 2040.
The average growth rate is estimated at approximately 3.44%, compounded annually between Existing (2019) and EAPC (2023) traffic conditions. The annual growth rate at each individual intersection is not lower than 3.24% compounded annually to as high as 3.63% compounded annually over the same time period. Therefore, the annual growth rate utilized for the purposes of this analysis would appear to conservatively approximate the anticipated regional growth in traffic volumes in the City of Rancho Mirage for EAPC (2023) traffic conditions, especially when considered along with the addition of project -related traffic. 12609-05 Report REV
1285
URBAN
C RCa44TIC]AeaS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 4-5: CUMULATIVE ONLY WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
er
CATHEDRAL CITY
4,01411.
FRANK SINATRA DR.
SITE
oI°I/C WY.
/�.DWY.2
RANCHO MIRAGE
741.
0.3 IAN qg
att�'IJ� Mir
V� W41, 4
= y *mow. a.
t
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Frank
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
0(0)
--�
—5(9)
Future
Intersection
o N o
j L.
.-0(0)
�0(o)
m N in
-1(2)
f-2(7)
0(0),
0(0)—
0(0)-i,
t
o vi 0
scar N -e
4(5)-4
2(1)—
2(1)—s a
1 t r-
ST • in a •
n
d'
LEGEND:
10(10) =AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 = VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1286
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 4-6: CUMULATIVE ONLY SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Highway 111 &
Frank Sinatra Dr.
4-0
M
4-11
Future
-1
�
~0
~6
Intersection
�
0-41
t
r'
6-41
t
r'
0—
0 I(1
0 1—
N btO
1!1
0—i,
2—*
LEGEND:
10 = SATURDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1287
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
4.6 HORIZON YEAR (2040) VOLUME DEVELOPMENT
Traffic projections for Horizon Year (2040) without Project conditions were derived from the Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RivTAM) using accepted procedures for model forecast refinement and smoothing for study area intersections located within the County of Riverside.
The current version of the RivTAM reflects the local input in the adopted 2016 SCAG RTP within the County of Riverside.
The traffic forecasts reflect the area -wide growth anticipated between Existing (2019) conditions and Horizon Year (2040) traffic conditions. In most instances the traffic model zone structure is not designed to provide accurate turning movements along arterial roadways unless refinement and reasonableness checking is performed. Therefore, the Horizon Year (2040) peak hour forecasts were refined using the model derived long range forecasts, base (validation) year model forecasts, along with existing peak hour traffic count data collected at each analysis location in December 2019. The RivTAM has a base (validation) year of 2012 and a horizon (future forecast) year of 2040. The difference in model volumes (2040-2012) defines the growth in traffic over the 28 -year period.
The refined future peak hour approach and departure volumes obtained from the model output data are then entered into a spreadsheet program consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP Report 255), along with initial estimates of turning movement proportions. A linear programming algorithm is used to calculate individual turning movements which match the known directional roadway segment forecast volumes computed in the previous step. This program computes a likely set of intersection turning movements from intersection approach counts and the initial turning proportions from each approach leg.
Typically, the model growth is prorated and is subsequently added to the existing (base validation) traffic volumes to represent Horizon Year traffic conditions. In an effort to conduct a conservative analysis, reductions to traffic forecasts from either Existing or Opening Year Cumulative traffic conditions were not assumed as part of this analysis. As such, in conjunction with the addition of cumulative projects that are not consistent with the General Plan, additional growth has also been applied on a movement -by -movement basis, where applicable, to estimate reasonable Horizon Year (2040) forecasts. Horizon Year (2040) turning volumes were compared to EAPC (2023) volumes in order to ensure a minimum growth as a part of the refinement process. The minimum growth includes any additional growth between EAPC (2023) and Horizon Year (2040) traffic conditions that is not accounted for by the traffic generated by cumulative development projects and ambient growth rates assumed between Existing (2019) and EAPC (2023) conditions. Adjustments have not been made to study area intersections that may be affected by new future roadway connections, where travel patterns would likely get affected and forecasts may potentially decrease from the EAPC conditions. Future estimated peak hour traffic data was used for new intersections and intersections with an anticipated change in travel patterns to further refine the Horizon Year (2040) peak hour forecasts.
The future Horizon Year (2040) Without Project peak hour turning movements were then reviewed by Urban Crossroads, Inc. for reasonableness, and in some cases, were adjusted to achieve flow conservation, reasonable growth, and reasonable diversion between parallel 12609-05 Report REV
1288
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
routes. Flow conservation checks ensure that traffic flow between two closely spaced intersections, such as two adjacent driveway locations, is verified in order to make certain that vehicles leaving one intersection are entering the adjacent intersection and that there is no unexplained loss of vehicles. The result of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes which are suitable for traffic operations analysis. Post -processing worksheets for Horizon Year (2040) without Project traffic conditions are provided in Appendix 4.1. 12609-05 Report REV
1289
ILURBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1290
URBAN
CwaO$zRraADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
5 E+P TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This section discusses the traffic forecasts for Existing Plus Project (E+P) traffic conditions and the resulting peak hour intersection operations, traffic signal warrant, and queuing analyses.
5.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for E+P conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following:
• Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for E+P conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements at the Project's frontage and driveways).
5.2 E+P TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
This scenario includes Existing traffic volumes plus Project traffic. E+P weekday ADT, weekday AM and weekday PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 5-
1. Weekend special event peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 5-2.
5.3 E+P INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
E+P peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2 Methodologies of this TIA. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 5-1, which indicate that there are no intersections operating at an unacceptable LOS with the addition of Project traffic.
Consistent with Table 5-1, a summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for E+P conditions is shown on Exhibit 5-3. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for E+P traffic conditions are included in Appendix 5.1 of this TIA.
5.4 E+P TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
Traffic signal warrants for E+P traffic conditions are based on planning level (ADT) and peak hour intersection volumes. For E+P traffic conditions, no study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix 5.2).
5.5 E+P QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis was performed for study area intersections to assess vehicle queues that may potentially impact peak hour operations. Queuing analysis findings are presented in Table 5-2.
It is important to note that lengths are consistent with the measured distance between the intersection and the end of the storage area.
12609-05 Report REV
1291
( URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 5-1: E+P WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
1 Frank
m"Izi,- 4-39(31)
i 1.
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
x-0(0)
2 Frank
.. N
c v
i 1.
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
15(8)
t-0(4)
'4-0(0)
3 Frank
N
N.
Cor0
M N m
v N
j i 1.
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
-362(301)
~59(49)
f -26O(149)
f
0(16)
1 t
24(41)-4
40(54)-*'
714(1193)-.-
87(174)-*
0 0
1(2)—
o .-
0 34(62)-
N
1(0)—
in
0 33(36)
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 ® VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1292
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 5-2: E+P SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
FRANK SINATRA DR.
RANCHO MIRAGE
1 Frank
co
v
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Coom
m m`
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
27(27)
3 Frank
y N
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
X160(160)
O Co
62(347)
m m m
•-1(1)
',7 m
~152(52)
1_f
-0(0)
i Ir
,4-0(0)
i
f-141(141)
f
1(1)-#
0(0)-
79(364)-.-
3(3)-*
35(106)-
190(76)--*
1078(1078)-.-
95(95)-*
0 0
0(0)-
64(163)-+
c c
N
0(0)-*
36(150)
LEGEND:
10(10) = ARRIVAL(DEPARTURE) PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1293
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 5-3: E+P SUMMARY OF LOS
'"I'swniKto
LEGEND:
▪ = AM PEAK HOUR LOS
= PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
C) = LOS A -D
▪ = LOS E
• = LOS F
12609 - los.dwg
URBAN
1294
CROSSROADS
Table 5-1
Intersecti on Analysis for E+P Conditions
Existing (2019)
E+P
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Ser vice
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Ser vice
Traffic
Weekday
Weekday
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
#
Intersection
Control
AM
PM
SAT
AM
PM
SAT
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 1
--/CSS
Future Intersection
8.5 8.5
8.6 10 .3
A
A
A
B
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 2
CSS
9.0 9.4
9 .7
AAA
9.2 10.2
15.5 15 .8
A
B
C
C
3 Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
TS
19.9 19 .2
18.1 BBB
20.6 20.0
23.0 26.1
CCCC
1 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersecti on de ay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control .
For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 2 CSS = Cross -street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal
3 Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
L?► URBAN
CROSS RCIA L S
Table 5-2
Peak Hour Queuing Summary for E+P C onditi ons
Intersectio n
Movement
Available
Stacking
Distance
(Feet)
Existing (2019)
E +P
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
SBL/T
200
0 0
36 0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
100
Future Intersection
46 46
44 89
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
SBL
220
0 10
10 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 14
9 39
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
200
34 28
45 Yes
Yes
Yes
37 34
45 37
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
NBL
260
66 59
82 Yes
Yes
Yes
72 101 2
368 2
118
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
SBR
300
0 0
0 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 0
0 0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
EBL
170
35 60
43 Yes
Yes
Yes
51 70
67 2332
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
EBT/R
270
41 74
51 Yes
Yes
Yes
151
92 101
325
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
D
C
tacking Distance is acceptable if the required stacking distance is less than or equal to the stacking distance pr ovided. An additional 15 feet of stacking which is assumed to be pr ovided in the transition f or turn pockets is reflected in the stacking distance sho wn on this table, where applicable. 2 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be lo nger. Queue sho wn is maximum after two cycles. 3 Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
��► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
As shown on Table 5-2 and consistent with Existing (2019) conditions, there are no potential queuing issues anticipated during the weekday peak 95th percentile traffic flows for E+P traffic conditions. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
Worksheets for E+P conditions queuing analysis are provided in Appendix 5.3.
5.6 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
5.6.1 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS DEFICIENCIES AT INTERSECTIONS No improvement strategies have been recommended for study area intersections as there no deficient intersections for E+P traffic conditions.
5.6.2 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS QUEUES
As shown previously on Table 5-2, there are no weekday peak hour queuing issues anticipated at the study area intersections for E+P traffic conditions. However, it is recommended that the following improvements be implemented to accommodate E+P weekend special event 95th percentile traffic flows:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage for the NBL movement • Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage for the EBL movement 12609-05 Report REV
1297
'► URBAN
C r¢r1 RC L S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1298
URBAN
C IRC➢44RC L S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
6 EAP (2023) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This section discusses the methods used to develop Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project (EAP) (2023) traffic conditions and the resulting peak hour intersection operations, traffic signal warrant, and queuing analyses.
6.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for EAP conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following:
• Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for EAP conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements at the Project's frontage and driveways).
6.2 EAP (2023) TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
To account for background traffic growth, an ambient growth from Existing conditions of 8.24% (2 percent per year over 4 years, compounded annually) is included for EAP traffic conditions.
Cumulative development projects are not included as part of the EAP analysis. EAP weekday ADT, weekday AM, and weekday PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 6-1. Weekend special event peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 6-2.
6.3 EAP (2023) INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
EAP peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2 Methodologies of this TIA. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 6-1, which indicate that there are no intersections operating at an unacceptable LOS with the addition of ambient growth and Project traffic.
Consistent with Table 6-1, a summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for EAP conditions is shown on Exhibit 6-3. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for EAP traffic conditions is included in Appendix 6.1 of this TIA.
6.4 EAP (2023) TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
Traffic signal warrants for EAP traffic conditions are based on planning level (ADT) and peak hour intersection volumes. For EAP traffic conditions, no study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix 6.2).
12609-05 Report REV
1299
► URBAN
C rxr1S,S.RC L S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 6-1: EAP (2023) WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY 46
1 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Frank
Co CO
r Co
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
rn in
. n N
4-16(9)
M N c
X392(326)
,r N
X39(31)
,1 7, "'
.-0(4)
" N
64(51)
4 1..
i-0(0)
j 4 I.
X0(0)
j 4 l,.
281(161)
f r-
0(17)
t ('
25(44)-4
43(57)-*
773(1291)-.-
94(188)-*
N o
1(2)—
o m o
36(66)—
rn
1(0)—*
iz o
34(38)
In
LEGEND:
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 m VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1300
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 6-2: EAP (2023) SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
FRANK SINATRA DR.
RANCHO MIRAGE
1 Frank
��
`N, or
N m
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
62(347)
f-0(0)
2 Frank
m m"
ram^ mq'
i L.
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
-29(29)
-*-1(1)
t-0(0)
3 Frank
Co
N Cl
Illco Cl
j*
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
X173(173)
-.-154(54)
*-153(153)
f
1(1)-
0(0)-
80(365)-.-
3(3)-*
37(108)-t1
} r-
ry o
0(0)-
67(166)-+
o .r.... --n;
m .-
N o
N
0(0)-*
37(151)-,
,T.; ,
m
.- n G
LO
LEGEND:
10(10) = ARRIVAL(DEPARTURE) PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1301
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 6-3: EAP (2023) SUMMARY OF LOS
'"I'swniKto
LEGEND:
▪ = AM PEAK HOUR LOS
= PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
= LOS A -D
▪ = LOS E
• = LOS F
12609 - los.dwg
URBAN
1302
CROSSROADS
Table 6-1
Intersection Analysis f or EAP (2023) Conditi ons
Existing (2019)
EAP (2023)
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Ser vice
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Ser vice
Traffic
Weekday
Weekday
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
#
Intersection
Control
AM
PM
SAT
AM
PM
S AT
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 1
--/CSS
Future Intersection
8.6 8.5
8.7 10 .3
A
A
A
B
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 2
CSS
9.0 9.4
9 .7
AAA
9.2 10.3
15.8 16 .1
A
B
C
C
3 Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
TS
19.9 19 .2
18.1 BBB
21.5 20.8
24.1 28.3
CCCC
1 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersecti on de ay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control .
For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 2 CSS = Cross -street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal
3 Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
Lam► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
6.5 EAP (2023) QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis was performed for study area intersections that may potentially impact peak hour operations. Queuing analysis findings are presented in Table 6-2. It is important to note that lengths are consistent with the measured distance between the intersection and the end of the storage area. As shown on Table 6-2 and consistent with Existing (2019) conditions, there are no potential queuing issues anticipated during the peak 95th percentile traffic flows for EAP (2023) traffic conditions. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
Worksheets for EAP (2023) conditions queuing analysis are provided in Appendix 6.3.
6.6 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
6.6.1 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS DEFICIENCIES AT INTERSECTIONS No improvement strategies have been recommended for study area intersections as there no deficient intersections for EAP (2023) traffic conditions.
6.6.2 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS QUEUES
As shown previously on Table 6-2, there are no weekday peak hour queuing issues anticipated at the study area intersections for EAP (2023) traffic conditions. However, it is recommended that the following improvements be implemented to accommodate EAP (2023) weekend special event 95th percentile traffic flows:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage for the NBL movement • Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage for the EBL movement 12609-05 Report REV
( URBAW
C rzra sRC . E's
1304
Table 6-2
Peak H our Queuing Summary for EAP (2023) C onditi ons
Intersection
Movement
Available
Stacking
Distance
(Feet)
Existing (2019)
EAP (2023)
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
SBL/T
200
0 18
27 9
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
100
Future Intersection
44 44
48 96
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
SBL
220
0 10
10 Yes
Yes
Yes
10 22
0 33
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
200
34 28
45 Yes
Yes
Yes
24 32
54 42
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
NBL
260
66 59
82 Yes
Yes
Yes
75 108 2
376 2
125 2
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
SBR
300
0 0
0 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 0
39 0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
EBL
170
35 60
43 Yes
Yes
Yes
53 74
70 2382
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
EBT/R
270
41 74
51 Yes
Yes
Yes
62 96
106
330
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
D
D
C
C
tacking Distance is acceptable if the required stacking distance is less than or equal to the stacking distance pr ovided. An additional 15 feet of stacking which is assumed to be pr ovided in the transition f or turn pockets is reflected in the stacking distance sho wn on this table, where applicable. 2 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be lo nger. Queue sho wn is maximum after two cycles.
Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
��► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1306
ILURBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
7 EAPC (2023) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This section discusses the methods used to develop Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Projects Plus Project (EAPC) (2023) traffic conditions and the resulting peak hour intersection operations, traffic signal warrant, and queuing analyses.
7.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for EAPC conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following:
• Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for EAPC conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements at the Project's frontage and driveways).
• Driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by cumulative developments to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for EAPC conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements along the cumulative development's frontages and driveways).
7.2 EAPC (2023) TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
To account for background traffic growth, other known cumulative development projects in the study area were included in addition to an ambient growth from Existing conditions of 8.24% (2 percent per year over 4 years, compounded annually) for EAPC traffic conditions. EAPC weekday ADT, weekday AM, and weekday PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 7-1. Weekend peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 7-2.
7.3 EAPC (2023) INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
EAPC peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2 Methodologies of this TIA. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 7-1, which indicate that there are no intersections operating at an unacceptable LOS with the addition of ambient growth, cumulative projects, and Project traffic.
Consistent with Table 7-1, a summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for EAPC conditions is shown on Exhibit 7-3. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for EAPC traffic conditions is included in Appendix 7.1 of this TIA.
7.4 EAPC (2023) TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
Traffic signal warrants for EAPC traffic conditions are based on planning level (ADT) and peak hour intersection volumes. For EAPC traffic conditions, no study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix 7.2). 12609-05 Report REV
1307
( Cli=405.1ROAOS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 7-1: EAPC (2023) WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
1 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Si;
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Frank
m
m tD
0 Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
l
.. N
T-16(9)
a FA a
—397(335)
a
4-39(31)
o m m
•-0(4)
a N
65(53)
I.
f-0(0)
i T..
f-0(0)
J i [..*-283(168)
f 1'
0(17)
1 t ('
29(49)-4
44(59)-
821(1346)
101(192)-*
F.' C
1(2)—
o ao 0
38(67)—
0 1(0)-
0 36(39)
N
o+
Ifl
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 m VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1308
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 7-2: EAPC (2023) SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
FRANK SINATRA DR.
RANCHO MIRAGE
1 Frank
Si
v
N m
1. Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
62(347)
f-0(0)
2 Frank
i n
m o"
00 iD
i 1.
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
29(29)
O
f-0(0)
3 Frank
M
P1 N
a m ry
m m
i 1.
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
184(184)
-156(56)
*-159(159)
f
1(1)-
0(0)-
85(370)-.-
3(3)-*
43(114)—#
1 t (--
n o
0(0)--
68(167)-+
ry m CO
co
n 0
N
0(0)—*
39(153)-
m o
M CO
C,1
N
LEGEND:
10(10) = ARRIVAL(DEPARTURE) PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1309
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 7-3: EAPC (2023) SUMMARY OF LOS
'"I'swniKto
LEGEND:
▪ = AM PEAK HOUR LOS
= PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
C) = LOS A -D
▪ = LOS E
• = LOS F
12609 - los.dwg
URBAN
1310
CROSSROADS
Table 7-1
Intersecti on Analysis for EAPC (2023) C onditions
Existing (2019)
EAPC (2023)
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Service
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Service
Traffic
Weekday
Weekday
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
#
Intersection
Control
AM
PM
SAT
AM
PM
SAT
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 1
--/CSS
Future Intersecti on
8.6 8.6
8.7 10.4
A
A
A
B
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 2
CSS
9.0 9.4
9 .7
AAA
9.3 10.4
16.0 16.3
A
B
C
C
3 Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr .
TS
19.9 19.2
18 .1
BBB
21.7 21.3
24.9 30.5
CCCC
1 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control.
For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 2 CSS = Cross -street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal
3 Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
t?► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
7.5 EAPC (2023) QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis was performed for study area intersections that may potentially impact peak hour operations. Queuing analysis findings are presented in Table 7-2. It is important to note that lengths are consistent with the measured distance between the intersection and the end of the storage area. As shown on Table 7-2 and consistent with Existing (2019) conditions, there are no potential queuing issues anticipated during the peak weekday 95th percentile traffic flows for EAPC (2023) traffic conditions. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
Worksheets for EAPC (2023) conditions queuing analysis are provided in Appendix 7.3.
7.6 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
7.6.1 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS DEFICIENCIES AT INTERSECTIONS No improvement strategies have been recommended for study area intersections as there no deficient intersections for EAPC (2023) traffic conditions.
7.6.2 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS QUEUES
As shown previously on Table 7-2, there are no weekday peak hour queuing issues anticipated at the study area intersections for EAPC (2023) traffic conditions. However, it is recommended that the following improvements be implemented to accommodate EAPC (2023) weekend special event 95th percentile traffic flows:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage for the NBL movement • Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage for the EBL movement 12609-05 Report REV
1312
ILL URBA11i1
Table 7-2
Peak Hour Queuing Summary for EAPC (2023) Conditions
Intersection
Movement
Available
Stacking
Distance
(Feet)
Existing (2019)
EAPC (2023)
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
95th Percentile Queue (Feet)2
Acceptable? 1
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
SBL/T
200
9 0
30 0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
100
Future Intersection
44 45
43 79
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
SBL
220
0 10
10 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 0
21 34
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
200
34 28
45 Yes
Yes
Yes
28 29
40 48
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
NBL
260
66 59
82 Yes
Yes
Yes
77 113 2
379 2
131 2
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
SBR
300
0 0
0 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 0
0 0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
EBL
170
35 60
43 Yes
Yes
Yes
57 862
822
2512
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
EBT/R
270
41 74
51 Yes
Yes
Yes
64 99
109
336
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
C
tacking Distance is acceptable if the required stacking distance is less than or equal to the stacking distance pr ovided. An additional 15 feet of stacking which is assumed to be pr ovided in the transition f or turn pockets is reflected in the stacking distance sho wn on this table, where applicable. 2 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be lo nger. Queue sho wn is maximum after two cycles. 3 Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
��► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1314
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
8 HORIZON YEAR (2040) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
This section discusses the methods used to develop Horizon Year Without and With Project and the resulting intersection operations, traffic signal warrants, and queuing analysis.
8.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for Horizon Year conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following:
• Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for Horizon Year With Project conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements at the Project's frontage and driveways). • Driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by cumulative developments to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for Horizon Year conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements along the cumulative development's frontages and driveways).
8.2 HORIZON YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes the refined post -process volumes obtained from the RivTAM (see Section
4.6 Horizon Year (2040) Volume Development of this TIA for a detailed discussion on the post - processing methodology). The weekday ADT, weekday AM, and weekday PM peak hour volumes which can be expected for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 8-1. Weekend peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 8-2.
8.3 HORIZON YEAR WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
This scenario includes the refined post -process volumes obtained from the RivTAM, plus the traffic generated by the proposed Project. Horizon Year (2040) With Project traffic forecasts assumes buildout of the Project. The weekday ADT, weekday AM, and weekday PM peak hour volumes which can be expected for Horizon Year (2040) With Project traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 8-3. Weekend peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 8-4.
8.4 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
LOS calculations were conducted for the study intersections to evaluate their operations under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions with roadway and intersection geometrics consistent with Existing conditions. As shown in Table 8-1, no study area intersections are anticipated to operate at unacceptable levels of service under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. With the addition of Project traffic, no additional study area intersections are anticipated to operate at unacceptable levels of service. 12609-05 Report REV
URBAN
1315
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 8-1: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES er
CATHEDRAL CITY
vioikkOi
FRANK SINATRA DR.
° 0.6 SITE
iT'DWY.2
/( °w
RANCHO MIRAGE
.040,40, ft
**IOW:4!
17.6 : 4411
a
IA "Al
V!t9W 4
= y gd11irlihS. .
1,1
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
Future
Intersection
2 Frank
Z -
o a .1
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
L18(29)
X0(1)
X0(0)
3 Frank
M
C,1 IN
m n N
a -m m
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
—489(184)
62(56)
X330(159)
0(1),
1(0)-4
22(370)-.-
0(3)-*
21(114)_J
43(82)-*
851(1233)-.-
104(108)-*
1(0)-
26(167)-
1(0)-*
22(153)-*
LEGEND:
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 = VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1316
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 8-2: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
er
FRANK SINATRA DR.
(+� SITE
0 DWY.2
. �*
l
I�.
RANCHO MIRAGE
741. ft
: 4411
IAN ri
iirstr
V� W 4
_ ~ *maths. all
1 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Frank
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
4-32
,
4-200
r00i o
�0
0 . N m
'-1
�0
v d ^'�
f35
l_176
f
1-47
t r'
24-#1
t i-
NO
0y
ON a
52-+
S a Co
0 14-
LEGEND:
10 = SATURDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
13'17
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 8-3: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
4,01411.
FRANK SINATRA DR.
1 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank
Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Frank
up—
Highway 111 &
Sinatra Dr.
N IA
.. FO m
X18(10)
a Ln--
-489(354)
a
X39(31)
Zr-
o u�i
X0(5)
cg m
66(57)
4 L.
t-0(0)
j 4 I.
X0(0)
j 4 l,.
330(178)
r-
o+ 0
0(19)-t
1(2)—
1 t r"
0 0 0
31(53)-41
40(73)—
ri P.
a
N
1(0)-
° 0
CO
38(42)—t
co Lo N
v :a
- CO
C
CO
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES
10.0 m VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1318
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 8-4: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CATHEDRAL CITY
er
FRANK SINATRA DR.
RANCHO MIRAGE
1 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 1
2 Frank Sinatra Dr. &
Dwy. 2
3 Highway 111 &
Frank Sinatra Dr.
Si SE
r:, a
VI
N
- a
,
a N -32(32)
e tO in
X200(200)
N N
62(347)
419, m
—1(1)
N d' N
—159(59)
f-0(0)
j*
( 0(0)
i l.,
*-176(176)
f
1(1)-
0(0)-
88(373)-.-
4(4)-s
40(111)-#
202(88)
1347(1347)-.-
119(119)-s
o+ 0
0(0)-
74(173)-+
rn 0
0(0)-*
39(153)
N
LEGEND:
10(10) = ARRIVAL(DEPARTURE) PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION VOLUMES
12609 - vols.dwg
URBAN
1319
CROSSROADS
Table 8-1
Intersection Analysis f or Horizon Year (2040) C onditions #
Intersection
Traffic
Control
2040 Without Project
2040 With Project
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Service
Delay2 (secs.)
Level of Service
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
1 2
3 Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 1
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy . 2
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr .
--/CSS
9.1 22.7
Future
9.7 22.6
Intersecti on
10 .0
20 .3
A
CCC
A
B
8.6 9.3
23.2 8.6
10.5 23.2
8.7 16.3
27.1 10.4
16.7 34.1
A
A
CCCC
A
B
A
C
B
C
CSS
TS
1 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control.
For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 2 CSS = Cross -street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal
3 Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Hour
t?► URBAN
CROSSROADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
A summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project traffic conditions are shown on Exhibits 8-5 and 8-6, respectively. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions are included in Appendix
8.1 of this TIA. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions are included in Appendix 8.2 of this TIA.
8.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
A traffic signal warrant analysis was performed at the unsignalized driveways for Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project traffic conditions. No study area intersections are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal under Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project traffic conditions.
Traffic signal warrants worksheets for Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project conditions are provided in Appendix 8.3 and Appendix 8.4, respectively.
8.6 QUEUING ANALYSIS
A queuing analysis was performed for the study area intersections to assess vehicle queues along the roadways. Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project queuing analysis findings are presented in Table 8-2.
As shown on Table 8-2, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday and weekend 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project.
With the addition of Project traffic, no intersection turning movements are anticipated to experience periodic queuing issues during one or both peak hours based on the weekday 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows. However, the following movements are anticipated to exceed the available storage lengths based on the weekend special event 95th percentile peak hour traffic flow:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — NBL movement
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — EBL movement
Worksheets for Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project conditions queuing analysis are provided in Appendices 8.5 and 8.6, respectively.
8.7 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
8.7.1 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS DEFICIENCIES AT INTERSECTIONS The study area intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions.
The study area intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of Project traffic. As such, no improvements have been recommended for Horizon Year (2040) traffic conditions.
12609-05 Report REV
1321
( URBAN
C R2 ACA S4R C7A[JS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 8-5: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT SUMMARY OF LOS
RANCHO MIRAGE
LEGEND:
(J _; = AM PEAK HOUR LOS
T = PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
= LOS A•D
= LOS E
® = LOS F
= NOT AN ANALYSIS LOCATION FOR THIS SCENARIO
12609 - los.dwg
12, CROSSROADS
URBAN
1322
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 8-6: HORIZON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT SUMMARY OF LOS DWY. 2
L�(c,wY
LEGEND:
= AM PEAK HOUR LOS
= PM PEAK HOUR LOS
= SATURDAY LOS
= LOS A -D
= LOS E
• = LOS F
12609 - los.dwg
12, CROSSROADS
URBAN
1323
Table 8-2
Peak Hour Queuing Summary f or H orizon Year (2040) Conditions Intersection
Movement
Available
Stacking
Distance
(Feet)
2040 With out Pr oject
2040 With Project
95th Percentil e Queue (Fe et}
Acc eptable? 1
95th Perc entil e Queue (Fe et
Acc eptable? 1
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
SAT
Weekday
Saturday
Weekday
Saturday
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
AM
PM
Arr3
Dep3
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 1
SBL/T
200
10 24
37 15
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WBL/R
100
Future Intersection
47 49
46 89
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Frank Sinatra Dr. & Dwy. 2
SBL
220
0 0
14 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 10
14 51
Yes
Yes
Yes
Y es
WBL/R
200
31 36
40 Yes
Yes
Yes
37 31
44 46
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr.
NBL
260
75 68
97 Yes
Yes
Yes
83 121 2
392 2
146 2
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
SBR
300
0 0
0 Yes
Yes
Yes
0 0
43 0
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
EBL
170
46 75
51 Yes
Yes
Yes
61 972
74 2462
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
0 EBT/R
270
48 89
75 Yes
Yes
Yes
68 107
115
343
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
0 acking Distance is acceptable if the required stacking distance is less than or equal to the stacking distance provided. An additional 15 feet of stacking which is assumed to be provided in the transition for turn p ockets is refl ected in the stacking distance shown on this table, where applicable. 2 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Arr = Arrival Peak Hour; Dep = Departure Peak Ho ur
(�► URBAN
CRQSSRCIADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
8.7.2 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ADDRESS QUEUES
As shown previously on Table 8-2, there are no weekday peak hour queuing issues anticipated at the study area intersections for Horizon Year (2040) traffic conditions. However, it is recommended that the following improvements be implemented to accommodate Horizon Year (2040) weekend special event 95th percentile traffic flows:
• Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage from 260' to 400' for the NBL movement • Hwy. 111 & Frank Sinatra Dr. (#3) — extend storage from 170' to 250' for the EBL movement 12609-05 Report REV
1325
ILURBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1326
ILURBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
9 LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISMS
9.1 TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) PROGRAM The TUMF program is administered by CVAG based upon a regional Nexus Study most recently updated in 2009 to address major changes in right of way acquisition and improvement cost factors. CVAG is currently in the process of completing a current Nexus Study update to the program. Final changes to network facilities, network cost allocations, and fee changes were not available at the time this assessment was prepared. This regional program was put into place to ensure that development pays its fair share and that funding is in place for construction of facilities needed to maintain the requisite level of service and critical to mobility in the region. The CVAG TUMF boundary covers many of the municipalities in the Coachella Valley while WRCOG TUMF cover those found in Western Riverside County.
TUMF fees are imposed on new residential, industrial, and commercial development through application of the TUMF fee ordinance and fees are collected at the building or occupancy permit stage. In addition, an annual inflation adjustment is considered each year in February. In this way, TUMF fees are adjusted upwards on a regular basis to ensure that the development impact fees collected keep pace with construction and labor costs, etc. 12609-05 Report REV
1327
I URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1328
URBAN
CwaO$zRraADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
10 REFERENCES
1. Riverside County Transportation Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide. County of Riverside : s.n., Updated April 2008.
2. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation. 10th Edition. 2017.
3. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Managing Travel for Planned Special Events. s.l. : FHWA, 2003.
4. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). s.l. : National Academy of Sciences, 2010.
5. California Department of Transportation. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). [book auth.] California Department of Transportation. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). 2014.
6. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. April 2016.
7. City of Rancho Mirage General Plan. City of Rancho Mirage. November 2005. 12609-05 Report REV
1329
Cok URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report REV
1330
URBAN
CwaO$zRraADS
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX 1.1:
APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT
12609-05 Report
1331
URBAN
C F 1Sh4RC . L S
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report
1332
ILURBAN
CROSSROADS
0 URBAN
October 15, 2019
Mr. Bill Enos
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
260 E. Baker St. I Suite 200 I Costa Mesa, CA 92626 I (949) 660-1994 SUBJECT: SLOPING AGREEMENT FOR RITZ-CARLTON RESIDENCES TRAFFIC IMPACT AND PARKING
ANALYSIS
Dear Mr. Bill Enos:
The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit this scoping agreement for Ritz -Carlton Residences ("Project"), which is located north of Mirada Circle and east of Frank Sinatra Drive, in the City of Rancho Mirage. It is our understanding that the Project is to expand the existing Ritz -Carlton hotel by 106 residential dwelling units, a 6,966 restaurant, and a 23,843 square foot venue. The traffic analysis will be conducted for the buildout of the Project with an anticipated opening year of 2023.
Our goal is to obtain comments from City of Rancho Mirage staff, to ensure that the traffic study fully addresses the potential impacts of the proposed Project. The remainder of this letter describes the proposed analysis methodology, Project trip generation, trip distribution, and Project traffic assignment/project trips on the surrounding roadway network. The following scoping assumptions have been prepared in accordance with the County of Riverside's Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide (April 2008) as the City of Rancho Mirage does not have its own traffic impact analysis guidelines.
The preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1.
Access to the Project site will be provided via the following roadways:
• Frank Sinatra Drive on SR -111 (full access)
Exhibit 2 depicts the location of the proposed Project in relation to the existing roadway network.
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted and produced by a development, and is based upon the specific land uses planned for a given project. In order to develop the traffic characteristics of the proposed project, trip -generation statistics published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) for the proposed land use was used. The trip generation summary illustrating daily and peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are shown in Table 1. As shown on Table 1, the proposed Project (typical 13133
12609-04 Scope
Mr. Bill Enos
City of Rancho Mirage
October 15, 2019
operations) is anticipated to generate a net total of 1,068 trip -ends per day, 51 AM peak hour trips and 86 PM peak hour trips.
It should be noted that the venue will generate trips outside the weekday AM and PM peak hours. As shown on Table 2, the proposed Project (special event) is anticipated to generate a net total of 416 peak hour trips.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The trip distribution patterns for the Project are graphically depicted on Exhibit 3. The trip distributions have been developed based on past work experience in the vicinity of the Project site and refined to reflect the roadway network and the surrounding uses in the vicinity of the proposed Project as they exist today.
STUDY AREA
The traffic impact study area was defined in conformance with the requirements of County of Riverside's Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide. Consistent with the County's TIA guidelines, study area intersections have been identified for the Project based on the contribution of 50 or more peak hour trips. Exhibit 2 presents the study area intersection analysis locations.
TRAFFIC COUNTS
Weekday traffic counts will be conducted during AM (7-9 AM) and PM (4-6 PM) peak hours once the scoping agreement has been approved during a typical Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday when local schools are in session and operating on a typical bell schedule. Weekend traffic counts will be conducted during the Saturday mid -day (10 AM to 2 PM) peak hours once the scoping agreement has been approved.
AMBIENT GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS
The ambient growth rate of 8.24% will be utilized for an opening year of 2023 (2% compounded over 4 years).
ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
The following analysis scenarios are proposed for this traffic study:
• Existing (2019)
• Existing Plus Project (E+P)
• Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project (E+A+P) (2023) 12609-04 Scope
13334
► URBAN
CDicl5R (MA, PS
Mr. Bill Enos
City of Rancho Mirage
October 15, 2019
• Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Projects Plus Project (E+A+C+P) (2023) • Horizon Year (2040) Without Project
• Horizon Year (2040) With Project
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA
Per Goal 1, Policy 1 of the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the following LOS will be utilized for study area intersections located within the City: Require development to achieve a peak hour LOS D or better at intersections and roadway segments.
PREFERRED ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
For the purposes of this analysis, signalized intersection operations analysis will be based on the methodology described in the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Intersection LOS operations are based on an intersection's average control delay. Unsignalized intersections will be evaluated using the methodology described in the HCM 6th Edition. At two-way or side -street stop -controlled intersections, LOS is calculated for each controlled movement and for the left turn movement from the major street, as well as for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane.
OPEN ITEMS - CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Please provide a list of cumulative projects to be included in the analysis. The City of Cathedral City will also be consulted for their input on cumulative projects within their jurisdiction.
SPECIAL ISSUES
The following issues will also be addressed as part of the TIA:
• Site Access Evaluation: Recommendations regarding site access and internal circulation features to accommodate peak hour traffic volumes will be included in the traffic study. Queuing analyses will be prepared for all turn lanes into the project site for "with project" scenarios. • Site Distance Evaluation: Recommendations regarding stopping, passing and corner sight distance standards at the Project driveways will be included in the traffic study. The evaluation will be determined from the Caltrans Highway Design Manual and based on the posted speed limit on Frank Sinatra Drive.
• Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: Signal warrant analysis will be prepared for unsignalized intersections for all study scenarios, except when an intersection is warranted in an earlier scenario. Peak hour volume based warrants (CA MUTCD Warrant 3) will be utilized for existing 12609-04 Scope
13135
URBAN
Mr. Bill Enos
City of Rancho Mirage
October 15, 2019
conditions. For future scenarios, CA MUTCD Figure 4C-103, Traffic Signals Warrant Worksheet (Average Traffic Estimate Form) will be utilized.
• Queuing Analysis: Queuing analyses will be prepared for all study area intersections in each analysis scenario. The analysis will identify the necessary lengths of turn pockets with storage and appropriate turn pocket transitions which adheres to the General Plan roadway classifications for the site adjacent roadways.
• Parking Analysis: Parking analysis will be prepared as described below:
• Review the parking policies in the City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code and General Plan Circulation Element.
• Identify parking requirements such as parking restrictions, minimum aisle widths, minimum turning radius, etc.
• Calculate the parking requirements and peak parking demand based on the City of Rancho Mirage Zoning Code. Compare the City of Rancho Mirage parking requirements for the Project uses with typical parking rates.
• Describe the historical monthly parking utilization at the project site based on a review of aerial photos.
• Estimate the proposed Ritz -Carlton Residences Project parking supply requirements based on a review of the existing parking demand counts. This includes shared parking opportunities and potential parking demand reductions associated with project design features promoting ride -sharing as well as bicycle, pedestrian and transit activities. • Determine if adequate parking supply is available to support the proposed uses. • Summarize the findings of the parking analysis in a letter report. • Special Event Queuing Analysis: Special Event Queuing analysis will be prepared as described below:
• Determine trip generation for the Project during special events. • Develop the Project trip distribution patterns during special events. • Conduct a queuing analysis at the study area intersections to identify the storage necessary to accommodate queuing during peak hour traffic flows for special events. 12609-04 Scope
13136
URBAN
Mr. Bill Enos
City of Rancho Mirage
October 15, 2019
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5992.
Respectfully submitted,
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.
.
Pranesh Tarikere, PE
Senior Engineer
12609-04 Scope
13137
URBAN
Table 1
Project Trip Generation Summary - Typical Operations
Land Use
ITE LU
Code
Units2
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Rates:'
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
220
DU
0.11 0.35
0.46 0.35
0.21 0.56
7.32 Quality Restaurant
931
TSF
0.49 0.24
0.73 5.23
2.57 7.80
83.84 Land Use
Quantity
Units2
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Summary:
Ritz -Carlton Residences
106
DU
11 38
49 37
22 59
776
Sky Mesa Restaurant
6.966
TSF
3 2
5 36
18 54
586
Internal Capture (50%)3
-2
-1
-3
-18
-9
-27
-294
Total
12 39
51 55
31 86
1,068
1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). 2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Internal capture reduction of 50% has been applied as a significant portion of the patrons would be internal to the existing hotel. 13138
liri::4wr,D CROSSROADS
URBAN
Table 2
Project Trip Generation Summary - Weekend Special Event Land Use
ITE LU
Code
Units2
Arrival Peak Hour
Departure Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Rates:1
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
220
DU
0.35 0.35
0.70 0.35
0.35 0.70
Quality Restaurant
931
TSF
6.30 4.38
10.68 6.30
4.38 10.68
Venue
Not Available
Land Use
Quantity
Units2
Arrival Peak Hour
Departure Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Project Trip Generation Summary:
Ritz -Carlton Residences
106
DU
37 37
74 37
37 74
Sky Mesa Restaurant
6.966
TSF
44 31
75 44
31 75
Internal Capture (50%)3
-22
-16
-38
-22
-16
-38
Venue4
381
Spaces
295
10 305
10 295
305
Total
354
62 416
69 347
416
1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). 2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Internal capture reduction of 50% has been applied as a significant portion of the patrons would be internal to the existing hotel.
4 Vehicle trips are calculated based on a maximum allowable occupancy of 0.8 per parking space. 13139
eirl' CROSSROADS
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Resid ences Tr affic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
12609 - siteplan. dwg
1:!!D CROS SROADS
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 2: LOCATION MAP
LEGEND:
0 = EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION
O = FUTURE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION
12609 - locmap.dwg
II2DICROSSROAIDS
URBAN
1 3141
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
EXHIBIT 3: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CATHEDRAL CITY
FRANK SINATRA DR.
LEGEND:
RANCHO MIRAGE
35 10 = PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT
12609 - trip.dwg
OURBAN
CROSSROAIS
1 342
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX 3.1:
EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS - DECEMBER 2019
12609-05 Report
1343
URBAN
Ritz -Carlton Residences Traffic Impact Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
12609-05 Report
1344
URBAN
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 01RNM_Frank Sinatra_DW2 AM
Site Code : 0511983_ 1
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 1
Frank Sinatra Drive
Southbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Int. Total
07:00 AM
2 9
0 11
0 0
5 5
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 1
19 07:15 AM
4 11
0 15
0 0
3 3
0 5
0 5
0 0
0 0
23 07:30 AM
4 8
0 12
0 0
4 4
1 4
0 5
0 0
1 1
22 07:45 AM
2 8
0 10
0 0
3 3
0 6
0 6
0 0
0 0
19 Total
12 36
0 48
0 0
15 15
1 17
0 18
0 1
1 2
83 08:00 AM
0 7
0 7
0 0
2 2
0 5
0 5
0 0
0 0
14 08:15 AM
1 5
0 6
0 0
1 1
0 3
0 3
0 0
0 0
10 08:30 AM
3 6
0 9
0 0
0 0
0 9
0 9
0 0
0 0
18 08:45 AM
3 5
3 11
0 0
4 4
0 6
0 6
0 0
0 0
21 Total
7 23
3 33
0 0
7 7
0 23
0 23
0 0
0 0
63 Grand Total
19 59
3 81
0 0
22 22
1 40
0 41
0 1
1 2
146
Apprch %
23.5 72.8
3.7 0
0 100
2.4 97.6
0 0
50 50
Total %
13 40.4
2.1 55.5
0 0
15.1 15.1
0.7 27.4
0 28.1
0 0.7
0.7 1.4
Frank Sinatra Drive
Southbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time
Left Thru Riqht App. Total
Left Thru I Ric ht I App. Total
Left I Thru I Richt I App. Total
Left I Thru Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM
2 9
0 11
0 0
5 5
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 1
19 07:15 AM
4 11
0 15
0 0
3 3
0 5
0 5
0 0
0 0
23 07:30 AM
4 8
0 12
0 0
4 4
1 4
0 5
0 0
1 1
22 07:45 AM
2 8
0 10
0 0
3 3
0 6
0 6
0 0
0 0
19 Total Volume
12 36
0 48
0 0
15 15
1 17
0 18
0 1
1 2
83 % App. Total
25 75
0 0
0 100
5.6 94.4
0 0
50 50
P H F
.750
.818
.000
.800
.000
.000
.750
.750
.250
.708
.000
.750
.000
.250
.250
.500
.902
Int. Total
13145
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
Weather: Clear
File Name : 01RNM_Frank Sinatra_DW2 AM
Site Code : 0511983_ 1
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
m —S
Frank Sinatra Drive
Out In Total
32 I 48
80 0 36 12]
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 All
Total Volume
4 r
Left Thru Right
1 17
37 18
0 55
Out In Total
Frank Sinatra nrivP
0 N
co
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Be ins at:
07:00 AM
07:00 AM
07:45 AM
07:00 AM
+0 mins.
2 9
0 11
0 0
5 5
0 6
0 6
0 1
0 1
+15 mins.
4 11
0 15
0 0
3 3
0 5
0 5
0 0
0 0
+30 mins.
4 8
0 12
0 0
4 4
0 3
0 3
0 0
1 1
+45 mins.
2 8
0 10
0 0
3 3
0 9
0 9
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
12 36
0 48
0 0
15 15
0 23
0 23
0 1
1 2
% App. Total
25 75
0 0
0 100
0 100
0 0
50 50
P H F
.750
.818
.000
.800
.000
.000
.750
.750
000
.639
.000
.639
.000
.250
.250
.500
13146
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 01RNM_Frank Sinatra_DW2 PM
Site Code : 0511983_ 1
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 1
Frank Sinatra Drive
Southbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Int. Total
04:00 PM
5 7
0 12
0 2
2 4
0 7
0 7
3 2
0 5
28 04:15 PM
7 5
0 12
0 1
2 3
0 3
0 3
1 0
0 1
19 04:30 PM
7 3
0 10
0 1
2 3
0 7
0 7
3 0
0 3
23 04:45 PM
6 3
1 10
0 0
2 2
0 3
0 3
9 0
0 9
24 Total
25 18
1 44
0 4
8 12
0 20
0 20
16 2
0 18
94 05:00 PM
8 2
1 11
0 0
6 6
0 4
0 4
1 0
0 1
22 05:15 PM
9 4
0 13
1 0
3 4
0 3
0 3
2 0
0 2
22 05:30 PM
4 4
0 8
0 0
3 3
1 2
0 3
2 0
0 2
16 05:45 PM
4 5
1 10
0 0
5 5
0 6
1 7
4 0
0 4
26 Total
25 15
2 42
1 0
17 18
1 15
1 17
9 0
0 9
86 Grand Total
50 33
3 86
1 4
25 30
1 35
1 37
25 2
0 27
180
Apprch %
58.1 38.4
3.5 3.3
13.3 83.3
2.7 94.6
2.7 92.6
7.4 0
Total %
27.8 18.3
1.7 47.8
0.6 2.2
13.9 16.7
0.6 19.4
0.6 20.6
13.9 1.1
0 15
Frank Sinatra Drive
Southbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time
Left Thru Riqht App. Total
Left Thru I Ric ht I App. Total
Left I Thru I Right I App. Total
Left I Thru Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM
5 7
0 12
0 2
2 4
0 7
0 7
3 2
0 5
28 04:15 PM
7 5
0 12
0 1
2 3
0 3
0 3
1 0
0 1
19 04:30 PM
7 3
0 10
0 1
2 3
0 7
0 7
3 0
0 3
23 04:45 PM
6 3
1 10
0 0
2 2
0 3
0 3
9 0
0 9
24 Total Volume
25 18
1 44
0 4
8 12
0 20
0 20
16 2
0 18
94 % App. Total
56.8 40.9
2.3 0
33.3 66.7
0 100
0 88.9
11.1 0
P H F
.893
.643
.250
.917
.000
.500
1.00 .750
.000
.714
.000
.714
.444
.250
.000
.500
.839
Int. Total
13147
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
Weather: Clear
File Name : 01RNM_Frank Sinatra_DW2 PM
Site Code : 0511983_ 1
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
N
to
m -S
h
Frank Sinatra Drive
Out In Total
44 44
88 1 18 25]
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PII
Total Volume
T r
Left Thru Right
o
20 18
20 0
38 Out In Total
Frank Sinatra nrivP
co
N
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
04:00 PM
04:00 PM
+0 mins.
5 7
0 12
0 0
6 6
0 7
0 7
3 2
0 5
+15 mins.
7 5
0 12
1 0
3 4
0 3
0 3
1 0
0 1
+30 mins.
7 3
0 10
0 0
3 3
0 7
0 7
3 0
0 3
+45 mins.
6 3
1 10
0 0
5 5
0 3
0 3
9 0
0 9
Total Volume
25 18
1 44
1 0
17 18
0 20
0 20
16 2
0 18
% App. Total
56.8 40.9
2.3 5.6
0 94.4
0 100
0 88.9
11.1 0
PHF
.893
.643
.250
.917
.250
.000
.708
.750
.000
.714
.000
.714
.444
.250
.000
.500
13148
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
Weather: Clear
Grouos Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 01RNM_Frank Sinatra_DW2 SAT
Site Code : 05_119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 1
Frank Sinatra Drive
Southbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru I Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Int. Total
10:00 AM
3 3
1 7
0 0
5 5
0 6
0 6
0 0
0 0
18 10:15AM
0 2
1 3
0 0
7 7
0 7
0 7
0 0
0 0
17 10:30 AM
3 1
0 4
0 0
6 6
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
12 10:45 AM
5 3
2 10
1 0
9 10
0 7
0 7
1 0
0 1
28 Total
11 9
4 24
1 0
27 28
0 22
0 22
1 0
0 1
75 11:00 AM
4 1
0 5
0 0
7 7
0 4
0 4
1 1
0 2
18 11:15 AM
7 1
1 9
2 0
8 10
1 3
0 4
1 0
0 1
24 11:30 AM
5 8
1 14
0 0
7 7
0 2
1 3
0 0
0 0
24 11:45 AM
7 4
2 13
0 0
5 5
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
22 Total
23 14
4 41
2 0
27 29
1 13
1 15
2 1
0 3
88 12:00 PM
5 5
1 11
1 0
5 6
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
21 12:15 PM
8 5
0 13
0 1
10 11
0 7
2 9
0 0
0 0
33 12:30 PM
4 3
1 8
0 0
6 6
0 3
0 3
0 0
0 0
17 12:45 PM
12 5
2 19
0 0
5 5
0 2
1 3
0 0
0 0
27 Total
29 18
4 51
1 1
26 28
0 16
3 19
0 0
0 0
98 01:00 PM
9 6
0 15
0 0
6 6
0 5
0 5
1 0
0 1
27 01:15 PM
5 5
4 14
0 1
6 7
0 0
1 1
2 0
0 2
24 01:30 PM
11 4
1 16
0 0
4 4
1 2
0 3
0 1
0 1
24 01:45 PM
8 4
0 12
0 0
10 10
0 1
0 1
2 0
1 3
26 Total
33 19
5 57
0 1
26 27
1 8
1 10
5 1
1 7
101
Grand Total
96 60
17 173
4 2
106
112
2 59
5 66
8 2
1 11
362
Apprch %
55.5 34.7
9.8 3.6
1.8 94.6
3 89.4
7.6 72.7
18.2 9.1
Total %
26.5 16.6
4.7 47.8
1.1 0.6
29.3 30.9
0.6 16.3
1.4 18.2
2.2 0.6
0.3 3
Frank Sinatra Drive
Southbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru I Right I App. Total
Left I Thru I Right I App. Total
Left I Thru Right App, Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 12:15 PM
12:15 PM
8 5
0 13
0 1
10 11
0 7
2 9
0 0
0 0
33 12:30 PM
4 3
1 8
0 0
6 6
0 3
0 3
0 0
0 0
17 12:45 PM
12 5
2 19
0 0
5 5
0 2
1 3
0 0
0 0
27 01:00 PM
9 6
0 15
0 0
6 6
0 5
0 5
1 0
0 1
27 Total Volume
33 19
3 55
0 1
27 28
0 17
3 20
1 0
0 1
104
% App. Total
60 34.5
5.5 0
3.6 96.4
0 85
15 100
0 0
P H F
.688
.792
.375
.724
.000
.250
.675
.636
.000
.607
.375
.556
.250
.000
.000
.250
.788
Int. Total
13149
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
Weather: Clear
File Name : 01RNM_Frank Sinatra_DW2 SAT
Site Code : 05_119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 2
rg
Y
a0
h
Frank Sinatra Drive
Out In Total
45 55
100
3 19 33
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 12:15 PII
Total Volume
T r
Left Thru Right
I 0
17 19
20 3
39 Out In Total
Frank Sinatra nriva
ca
03 Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
12:45 PM
10:45 AM
10:00 AM
01:00 PM
+0 mins.
12 5
2 19
1 0
9 10
0 6
0 6
1 0
0 1
+15 mins.
9 6
0 15
0 0
7 7
0 7
0 7
2 0
0 2
+30 mins.
5 5
4 14
2 0
8 10
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 1
+45 mins.
11 4
1 16
0 0
7 7
0 7
0 7
2 0
1 3
Total Volume
37 20
7 64
3 0
31 34
0 22
0 22
5 1
1 7
% App. Total
57.8 31.2
10.9 8.8
0 91.2
0 100
0 71.4
14.3 14.3
P H F
.771
.833
.438
.842
.375
.000
.861
.850
.000
.786
.000
.786
.625
.250
.250
.583
1 315 0
Location: Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
PEDESTRIANS
Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
North Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
East Leg
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
South Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
West Leg
Parking Lot Driveway
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
4 3
2 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
5 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
4 2
9 0
15 Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
North Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
East Leg
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
South Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
West Leg
Parking Lot Driveway
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
1 0
0 1
2 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
1 0
3 1
5 Date: 12/7/2019
Day: Saturday
North Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
East Leg
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
South Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
West Leg
Parking Lot Driveway
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
3 0
0 0
3 0
2 2
4 2
7 1
1 1
0 1
1 10
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
2 0
4 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
7 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
7 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
25 0
14 0
39 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
11 Location: Rancho Mirage
N/S: Frank Sinatra Drive
E/W: Driveway 2
IY Nola al
BICYCLES
Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Left
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Left
Left
Thru
Right
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Thru
Right
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Left
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Left
Left
Thru
Right
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Thru
Right
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Date: 12/7/2019
Day: Saturday
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Ritz -Carlton Driveway
Left
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Parking Lot Driveway
Left
Left
Thru
Right
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Thru
Right
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
rouos Printed- Pass enger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
N orthbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
E xclu. Total
I nclu. Total
Int . Total
07:00 AM
36 136
8 1
180
33 13
39 0
85 6
145
18 0
169
6 3
1 1
10 2
444
446
07:15 AM
58 176
9 5
243
40 16
74 0
130
5 194
23 0
222
7 2
2 0
11 5
606
611
07:30 AM
83 262
11 6
356
57 13
100
0 170
8 170
21 0
199
4 4
8 1
16 7
741
748
07:45 AM
67 301
14 3
382
66 14
107
0 187
13 183
23 0
219
6 6
4 2
16 5
804
809
Total
244
875
42 15
1161
196
56 320
0 572
32 692
85 0
809
23 15
15 4
53 19
2595
2614
08:00 AM
58 270
7 3
335
69 14
77 0
160
6 177
17 0
200
2 4
4 2
10 5
705
710
08:15 AM
60 295
6 1
361
68 14
78 0
160
8 184
26 0
218
2 6
1 1
9 2
748
750
08:30 AM
62 220
8 5
290
55 6
90 0
151
6 221
13 0
240
2 9
4 1
15 6
696
702
08:45 AM
68 271
10 5
349
59 9
94 0
162
8 222
28 0
258
4 7
6 3
17 8
786
794
Total
248
1056
31 14
1335
251
43 339
0 633
28 804
84 0
916
10 26
15 7
51 21
2935
2956
Grand Total
492
1931
73 29
2496
447
99 659
0 1205
60 1496
169
0 1725
33 41
30 11
104
40 5530
5570
Apprc h %
19. 7
77.4 2. 9
37. 1
8.2 54.7
3 .5
86.7 9.8
31 .7
39.4 28 .8
Total %
8.9 34.9
1. 3
45.1 8.1
1.8 11.9
21.8 1.1
27 .1
3.1 31 .2
0.6 0.7
0.5 1 .9
0.7 99.3
pssnger Vehicles
enger V ehicles
469
95.3 1829
94.7 67
91. 8
93. 1
2392
94.7 431
96. 4
95 96
642
97.4 0
1168
96.9 57
95 1459
97.5 168
99.4 0
1684
97.6 30
90 .9
41 100
28 93.3
90.9 109
94 .8
0 0
0 0
5353
96 .1
I Axle V ehicles
20 90
6 118
15 3
15 33
3 32
0 35
2 0
2 5
0 0
191
2 Axle Vehicles
4. 1
4.7 8. 2
6.9 4.7
3. 4
3 2.3
0 2.7
5 2.1
0 0
2 6 .1
0 6.7
9.1 4.3
0 0
3 .4
COAX� Vehicles
2 5
0 7
1 0
1 2
0 4
0 4
1 0
0 1
0 0
14 % 3 Axle Vehicles
0. 4
0. 3
0 0
0.3 0.2
0 0.2
0 0.2
0 0 .3
0 0
0 .2
3 0
0 0
0 .9
0 0
0 .3
4+ Axle Trucks
1 7
0 8
0 1
1 2
0 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 % 4+ Axle Trucks
0. 2
0. 4
0 0
0.3 0
1 0.2
0 0.2
0 0.1
0.6 0
0 .1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 .2
Highwa y 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatr a Driv e
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
L eft
Thru Right I App . Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM
83 262
11 356
57 13
100
170
8 170
21 199
4 4
8 16
741
07:45 AM
67 301
14 382
66 14
107
187
13 183
23 219
6 6
4 16
804
08:00 AM
58 270
7 335
69 14
77 160
6 177
17 200
2 4
4 10
705
08:15 AM
60 295
6 361
68 14
78 160
8 184
26 218
2 6
1 9
748
Total Volume
268
1128
38 1434
260
55 362
677
35 714
87 836
14 20
17 51
2998
% App. To tal
18.7 78.7
2.6 38.4
8.1 53.5
4. 2
85.4 10.4
27.5 39 .2
33.3 PHF
. 807
. 937
. 679
. 938
.942
. 982
. 846
.905
. 673
.970
.837
.954
.583
.833
.531
.797
.932
Int. Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
co
o
o
C
N
" O
N
Highway 111
Out In T otal
1090
1434
2524
38 1128
268
Right Thru Le[:_f_Dt
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger Vehicl es
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
47 14
Left Thru Right
35 714
1405
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
836
87 2241
2 rn
O1
N
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
08:00 AM
07:00 AM
+0 mins.
83 262
11 356
57 13
100
170
6 177
17 200
6 3
1 10
+ 15 mins.
67 301
14 382
66 14
107
187
8 184
26 218
7 2
2 11
+ 30 mins.
58 270
7 335
69 14
77 160
6 221
13 240
4 4
8 16
+45 mins.
60 295
6 361
68 14
78 160
8 222
28 258
6 6
4 16
Total Volume
268
1128
38 1434
260
55 362
677
28 804
84 916
23 15
15 53
% App. Total
18.7 78. 7
2. 6
38 .4
8.1 53 .5
3.1 87 .8
9 .2
43 .4
28.3 28 .3
PHF
.807
.937
.679
.938
.942
.982
.846
.905
.875
.905
.750
.888
.821
.625
.469
.828
01 Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Le ft
07:00 AM
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
07:45 AM
Total 231 819 37 13 1087
Ri. ht
RTOR
A. Total
35 55
81 60
117
167
245
290
6 7
11 13
0 4
6 3
158
229
337
363
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
08:45 AM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h
Total %
th
55 58
57 68
238
469
19. 8
8.8 253
281
211
265
1010
1829
77.3 34.4
7 6
8 9
30 3
1 5
5 14
315
345
276
342
1278
67 27 2365
2. 8
1.3 44.5
Left
Thru
Ri•ht
RTOR
A.. . Total
29 39
55 63
12 16
12 13
38 0
73 0
99 0
103 0
79 128
166
179
186 53 313 0 552
66 67
54 58
245
14 13
6 9
42 77
73 89
90 329
0 0
0 0
0 157
153
149
157
616
431 95 642 0 1168
36. 9 8.1 55
8.1 1.8 12.1
22 Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
166
218
197
216
797
6 142
5 190
8 168
12 181
31 681 85
18 23
21 23
0 0
0 0
5 8
6 7
26 57
3 .4
1.1 172
178
216
212
778
1459
86.6 27 .4
17 25
13 28
83 0
0 0
0 0
168 0
10 3.2
194
211
235
247
887
1684
31 .7
Left
Thru
R' ht
RTOR
A . Total E xclu. Total
6 6
4 5
3 2
4 6
1 2
7 4
1 0
0 2
10 10
15 15
21 15 14 3
2 1
2 4
9 4
6 9
7 26
4 1
4 5
14 2
1 1
3 7
30 41 28 10
30 .3 41.4 28.3
0 .6 0.8 0.5
I nclu. Total
1 413
4 585
6 715
5 773
50 16 2486
10 8
15 16
49 99
1.9 5
2 6
8 21
676
717
675
762
2830
Int . Total
414
589
721
778
2502
681
719
681
770
2851
37 5316 5353
0.7 99.3
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left I
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left I
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left I
Thru 1 Right f App. Total
Left I
Thru I Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM
81 245
11 337
55 12
99 166
8 168
21 197
4 4
7 15
715
07:45 AM
60 290
13 363
63 13
103
179
12 181
23 216
5 6
4 15
773
08:00 AM
55 253
7 315
66 14
77 157
5 172
17 194
2 4
4 10
676
08:15 AM
58 281
6 345
67 13
73 153
8 178
25 211
1 6
1 8
717
Total Volume
254
1069
37 1360
251
52 352
655
33 699
86 818
12 20
16 48
2881
% App. Total
18.7 78.6
2.7 38. 3
7.9 53.7
4 85 .5
10.5 25
41.7 33.3
PHF
. 784
.922
.712
.937
.937
.929
. 854
.915
.688
.965
.860
.947
.600
.833
.571
.800
.932
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
C-
.
01 o
o
N
C
o)
7 LL O
N
N
Highway 111
Out In T otal
1063
1360
2423
37 1069
254
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger Vehicl es
47 14
Left Thru Right
33 699 86
1336
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
818
2154
2 N
N
0 cn
cn
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
+0 mins.
81 245
11 337
55 12
99 166
8 168
21 197
4 4
7 15
+ 15 mins.
60 290
13 363
63 13
103
179
12 181
23 216
5 6
4 15
+ 30 mins.
55 253
7 315
66 14
77 157
5 172
17 194
2 4
4 10
+45 mins.
58 281
6 345
67 13
73 153
8 178
25 211
1 6
1 8
Total Volume
254
1069
37 1360
251
52 352
655
33 699
86 818
12 20
16 48
% App. Total
18.7 78. 6
2.7 38 .3
7.9 53 .7
4 85 .5
10 .5
25 41.7
33 .3
PHF
.784
.922
.712
.937
.937
.929
.854
.915
.688
.965
.860
.947
.600
.833
.571
.800
000
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Le ft
07:00 AM
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
07:45 AM
Ri. ht
RTOR
A. Total
1 3
2 6
15 9
15 10
2 2
0 1
0 0
18 14
17 17
Total 12 49 5 2 66
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
08:45 AM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h %
Total %
th
3 2
3 0
8 13
14 8
6 41
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
20 90 6 2
17. 2 77.6 5. 2
10.6 47.9 3.2
16 16
11 7
50 116
61.7 L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
3 1
2 3
9 2
1 0
0 1
1 1
1 4
0 0
0 0
5 2
3 8
3 1
1 1
6 15
45.5 8
0 0
0 1
0 4
0 4
8 0
0 0
0 0
3 15 0
9.1 45 .5
1. 6 8
18 3
6 1
5 15
33 17.6
Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
0 0
0 2 0
3 0
1 0
2 0
8 0
0 0
0 2
3 1
3 9
1 0
0 1
2 5
6 4
9 24
3 32
8 .6 91 .4
1 .6 17
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 6
4 10
26 0 0 35
0 0 18 .6
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A•.., Total E xclu. Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 2 0 2 1
50 0 50
1 .1 0 1.1
2 0
1 0
1 2
4 2 .1
I nclu. Total
0 25
19 22
29 95 98
Int . Total
26 20
23 29
0 0
0 0
0 25
29 16
23 93
25 29
16 23
93 3 188 191
1.6 98.4
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left I
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left I
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left I
Thru 1 Right f App. Total
Left I
Thru I Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM
2 15
0 17
2 0
1 3
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 1
22 07:45 AM
6 10
1 17
3 1
4 8
1 2
0 3
1 0
0 1
29 08:00 AM
3 13
0 16
3 0
0 3
1 5
0 6
0 0
0 0
25 08:15 AM
2 14
0 16
1 1
4 6
0 6
0 6
1 0
0 1
29 Total Volume
13 52
1 66
9 2
9 20
2 14
0 16
2 0
1 3
105
% App. Total
19.7 78. 8
1.5 45
10 45
12.5 87 .5
0 66 .7
0 33.3
PHF
.542
.867
.250
.971
.750
.500
. 563
.625
.500
.583
.000
.667
.500
.000
.250
750
.905
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
C.
O
co
o
o
C
c
•
" O
N
Highway 111
Out In T otal
25 66
91 52
13 Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
47 14
Left Thru Right
2 14
0 62
16 78
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
2 O
co
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
+0 mins.
2 15
0 17
2 0
1 3
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 1
+ 15 mins.
6 10
1 17
3 1
4 8
1 2
0 3
1 0
0 1
+ 30 mins.
3 13
0 16
3 0
0 3
1 5
0 6
0 0
0 0
+45 mins.
2 14
0 16
1 1
4 6
0 6
0 6
1 0
0 1
Total Volume
13 52
1 66
9 2
9 20
2 14
0 16
2 0
1 3
% App. Total
19.7 78.8
1. 5
45 10
45 12.5
87 .5
0 66 .7
0 333
PHF
.542
.867
.250
.971
.750
.500
.563
.625
.500
.583
.000
.667
.500
.000
.250
.750
co
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Frank Sinatra Dri ve
Westbound
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left
07:00 AM
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
07:45 AM
Right RTOR
A. Total
0 1
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 1
0 0 1
Total 1 2 0 0 3
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
08:45 AM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h °Ao
Total %
0 2 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0
1 3 0 0 4
2 5 0 0 7
28. 6 71.4 0
14.3 35.7 0
50 Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 o o 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1
0 0
1 1 0 1 0 2
50 0 50
7.1 0 7.1
14.3 Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0 0 2
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1
0 2 0 0 2
0 4 0 0 4
0 100 0
0 28 .6 0 28 .6
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A . Total E xclu. Total
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o o 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1 0 0 0 1
100 0 0
7.1 0 0
7 .1
I nclu. Total
0 0
0 0
3 2
1 1
Int . Total
3 2
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 1
3 1
7 2
1 3
1 7
0 14 14
0 100
V
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru I Right f App. Total
Left
Thru Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 07:45 AM
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 08:00 AM
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 08:15 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 Total Volume
1 3
0 4
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 % App. Total
25 75
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
PHF
.250
.375
.000
.500
.000
. 000
.250
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.625
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
W
O
o
o
� C
o)
c
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
4 o
3 Right Thru Left
5 Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
3 Axle Vehicles
47 14
Left Thru Right
0 0
0 0
3 O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
2 o
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Begins at:
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
+0 mins.
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+15 mins.
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+ 30 mins.
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+ 45 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
1 3
0 4
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% App. Total
25 75
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
PHF
.250
.375
.000
.500
.000
.000
.250
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Frank Sinatra Dri ve
Westbound
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left
07:00 AM
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
07:45 AM
Total
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
08:45 AM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h
Total %
Ri. ht RTOR
A. Total
0 3 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1
0 2 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0 3
1 7 0 0 8
12. 5 87.5 0
8.3 58.3 0 66.7
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0
o o o o o
0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1
0 1 1 0 2
0 50 50
0 8. 3 8.3 16.7
Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1
0 1 1 0 2
0 50 50
0 8 .3 8.3 16 .7
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A . Total E xclu. Total
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 1
I nclu. Total
3 Int . Total
3 0
3 1
o 2 2
0 1 1
0 2 2
0 0 0
0 5 5
0 12 12
0 100
�v
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru I Right f App. Total
Left
Thru Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
3 07:45 AM
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 08:00 AM
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 08:15 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
1 Total Volume
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
7 % App. Total
0 100
0 0
100
0 0
50 50
0 0
0 PHF
.000
.500
.000
.500
.000
.250
. 000
.250
.000
.250
.250
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.583
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
o
o
� C
o)
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
4 o
4 o
Right Thru Left
5 Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
4+ Axle Trucks
47 14
Left Thru Right
0 1 1
4 2
2 o
O ut In To tal
Hinhwav 111
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra AM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 07:30 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
+0 mins.
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
+ 15 mins.
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+ 30 mins.
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+45 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
% App. Total
0 100
0 0
100
0 0
50 50
0 0
0 PHF
.000
.500
. 000
.500
.000
.250
.000
:250
.000
.250
.250
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
rouos Printed- Pass enger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
N orthbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right I RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. T otal
E xclu. Total I I nclu. Total
Int . Total
04:00 PM
77 275
4 1
356
40 9
82 0
131
7 339
48 0
394
7 7
7 0
21 1
902
903
04:15 PM
60 278
7 2
345
37 5
78 0
120
10 323
51 0
384
8 6
4 0
18 2
867
869
04:30 PM
106
289
4 1
399
43 10
80 0
133
8 274
52 0
334
5 8
5 1
18 2
884
886
04:45 PM
99 293
6 1
398
35 7
80 0
122
7 289
50 0
346
10 9
5 1
24 2
890
892
Total
342
1135
21 5
1498
155
31 320
0 506
32 1225
201
0 1458
30 30
21 2
81 7
3543
3550
05:00 PM
86 252
4 2
342
40 3
65 0
108
9 319
50 0
378
13 26
7 1
46 3
874
877
05:15 PM
77 338
5 2
420
31 10
76 0
117
8 311
22 1
341
5 8
7 3
20 6
898
904
05:30 PM
86 257
0 0
343
27 5
63 0
95 9
306
35 0
350
5 3
8 3
16 3
804
807
05:45 PM
49 222
5 2
276
22 3
42 0
67 10
268
23 0
301
5 5
7 1
17 3
661
664
Total
298
1069
14 6
1381
120
21 246
0 387
36 1204
130
1 1370
28 42
29 8
99 15
3237
3252
Grand Total
640
2204
35 11
2879
275
52 566
0 893
68 2429
331
1 2828
58 72
50 10
180
22 6780
6802
Apprc h %
22. 2
76.6 1. 2
30. 8
5.8 63.4
2 .4
85.9 11.7
32 .2
40 27 .8
Total %
9.4 32.5
0. 5
42.5 4.1
0.8 8.3
13.2 1
35 .8
4.9 41 .7
0.9 1.1
0.7 2 .7
0.3 99.7
-_4 nger vehicles
636
2177
35 2859
274
51 560
885
67 2380
323
2771
58 70
50 188
0 0
6703
h•-ssenger V ehicles
99. 4
98. 8
100
100
98.9 99. 6
98. 1
98.9 0
99 .1
98.5 98
97.6 100
97 .9
100
97.2 100
100
98 .9
0 0
98 .5
1t♦Te i Axle v ehicles
3 24
0 27
0 1
6 7
1 44
7 52
0 2
0 2
0 0
88 e 2Axle Vehldes
0. 5
1.1 0
0 0.9
0 1.9
1.1 0
0.8 1 .5
1.8 2.1
0 1.8
0 2.8
0 0
1 .1
0 0
1.3 e Vehicles
1 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 3
1 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 3 Axle Vehicles
0. 2
0 0
0 0. 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 .1
0.3 0
0 .1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.1
4+ Axle Trucks
0 2
0 2
1 0
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 4+ Axle Trucks
0 0. 1
0 0
0.1 0. 4
0 0
0 0.1
0 0 .1
0 0
0 .1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 .1
Highwa y 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatr a Driv e
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App . Total
L eft
Thru Right 1 App . Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM
106
289
4 399
43 10
80 133
8 274
52 334
5 8
5 18
884
04:45 PM
99 293
6 398
35 7
80 122
7 289
50 346
10 9
5 24
890
05:00 PM
86 252
4 342
40 3
65 108
9 319
50 378
13 26
7 46
874
05:15 PM
77 338
5 420
31 10
76 117
8 311
22 341
5 8
7 20
898
Total Volume
368
1172
19 1559
149
30 301
480
32 1193
174
1399
33 51
24 108
3546
% App. To tal
23.6 75.2
1.2 31
6.2 62.7
2. 3
85.3 12.4
30.6 47 .2
22.2 PHF
. 868
.867
. 792
. 928
.866
.750
. 941
.902
. 889
.935
.837
.925
.635
.490
.857
.587
.987
Int. Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
C-
.
o
o
C
c
m s
" O
CO
LO
N
Highway 111
Out In T otal
1527
1559
3086
19 1172
368
Right Thru Le[:_f_Dt
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger Vehicl es
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
47 14
Left Thru Right
32 1193
174
1345
O ut In To tal
Hinhwav 111
1399
2744
2 wn
O
0 co
w
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:00 PM
04:00 PM
04:30 PM
+0 mins.
106
289
4 399
40 9
82 131
7 339
48 394
5 8
5 18
+ 15 mins.
99 293
6 398
37 5
78 120
10 323
51 384
10 9
5 24
+ 30 mins.
86 252
4 342
43 10
80 133
8 274
52 334
13 26
7 46
+45 mins.
77 338
5 420
35 7
80 122
7 289
50 346
5 8
7 20
Total Volume
368
1172
19 1559
155
31 320
506
32 1225
201
1458
33 51
24 108
% App. Total
23.6 75. 2
1. 2
30 .6
6.1 63 .2
2.2 84
13 .8
30 .6
47.2 22 .2
PHF
.868
.867
.792
.928
.901
.775
.976
.951
.800
.903
.966
.925
.635
.490
.857
.587
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Total 340 1120 21
Right RTOR
A. Total
77 60
104
99 273
275
282
290
4 7
4 6
1 2
1 1
354
342
390
395
05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h
Total %
-41
85 76
86 49
296
250
333
256
218
1057
636 2177
22. 3 76.4
9.5 32.6
4 5
0 5
14 2
2 0
2 6
1481
339
414
342
272
1367
35 11 2848
1. 2
0.5 42.6
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
39 37
43 35
9 5
10 7
81 78
79 80
0 0
0 0
129
120
132
122
154 31 318 0 503
40 31
27 22
120
3 10
4 3
20 62
75 63
42 242
0 0
0 0
0 105
116
94 67
382
274 51 560 0 885
31 5.8 63.3
4.1 0.8 8.4 13.2
Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
383
369
329
339
7 329
10 313
8 270
7 283
32 1195 193
47 46
51 49
0 0
0 0
8 314
8 307
9 299
10 265
35 1185
50 22
35 23
130
0 1
0 0
1420
372
337
343
298
1350
67 2380 323 1 2770
2 .4 85.9 11.7
1 35 .6 4.8 41 .5
Left
Thru
Ri • ht
RTOR
A... T otal E xclu. Total I nclu. Total
7 8
5 10
30 29 21 2 80
7 6
7 9
7 4
5 5
0 0
21 18
17 24
13 5
5 5
28 26
8 3
4 41
7 7
8 7
29 1
3 3
1 8
46 20
16 16
98 58 70 50 10 178
32 .6 39.3 28.1
0 .9 1 0.7
2.7 1
2 2
2 3
6 3
3 15
887
849
868
880
3484
862
887
795
653
3197
Int . Total
888
851
870
882
3491
865
893
798
656
3212
22 6681 6703
0.3 99.7
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left I
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left I
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left I
Thru I Right f App. Total
Left I
Thru I Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM
104
282
4 390
43 10
79 132
8 270
51 329
5 7
5 17
868
04:45 PM
99 290
6 395
35 7
80 122
7 283
49 339
10 9
5 24
880
05:00 PM
85 250
4 339
40 3
62 105
8 314
50 372
13 26
7 46
862
05:15 PM
76 333
5 414
31 10
75 116
8 307
22 337
5 8
7 20
887
Total Volume
364
1155
19 1538
149
30 296
475
31 1174
172
1377
33 50
24 107
3497
% App. Total
23.7 75. 1
1. 2
31. 4
6.3 62.3
2.3 85 .3
12.5 30 .8
46.7 22 .4
PHF
.875
.867
.792
.929
. 866
.750
.925
.900
.969
.935
.843
.925
.635
.481
.857
.582
.986
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
o
o
o)
c
LL
oo
co
Highway 111
Out In T otal
1503
1538
3041
19 1155
364
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Passenger Vehicl es
47 14
Left Thru Right
31 1174
172
1328
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
1377
2705
2 o)
0 co
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
104:30
PM
04:30 PM
+0 mins.
104
282
4 390
43 10
79 132
8 270
51 329
5 7
5 17
+ 15 mins.
99 290
6 395
35 7
80 122
7 283
49 339
10 9
5 24
+ 30 mins.
85 250
4 339
40 3
62 105
8 314
50 372
13 26
7 46
+45 mins.
76 333
5 414
31 10
75 116
8 307
22 337
5 8
7 20
Total Volume
364
1155
19 1538
149
30 296
475
31 1174
172
1377
33 50
24 107
% App. Total
23.7 75.1
1. 2
31 .4
6.3 62.3
2.3 85 .3
12.5 30 .8
46.7 22 .4
PHF
.875
.867
.792
.929
.866
.750
.925
.900
.969
.935
.843
.925
.635
.481
.857
.582
W
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Right RTOR
A. Total
0 1
0 3
1 7
0 2
0 0 1
0 0 3
0 0 8
0 0 2
Total 1 13 0 0 14
05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h %
Total %
1 2 0 0 3
1 4 0 0 5
0 1 0 0 1
0 4 0 0 4
2 11 0 0 13
3 24 0 0 27
11.1 88.9 0
3. 4 27.3 0 30.7
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
o o 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 3 0 3
0 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 4 0 5
Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
0 10
0 7
0 4
0 5
1 0 11
5 0 12
0 0 4
1 0 6
26 7 0 33
1 4 0 0 5
0 4 0 0 4
0 7 0 0 7
0 3 0 0 3
1 18 0 0 19
0 1 6 0 7 1 44 7 0 52
0 14.3 85 .7 1 .9 84 .6 13.5
0 1. 1 6.8 8 1.1 50 8 59 .1
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A•.., Total E xclu. Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o o 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
0 0 2 0 0 2
0 100 0
0 2.3 0
2 .3
I nclu. Total
Int . Total
0 0
0 0
13 13
15 15
14 14
8 8
50 50
0 11 11
0 10 10
0 9 9
0 8 8
0 38 38
0 88 88
0 100
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App . Total
Left
Thru I Right f App. Total
Left
Thru Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM
1 7
0 8
0 0
1 1
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
14 04:45 PM
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 5
1 6
0 0
0 0
8 05:00 PM
1 2
0 3
0 0
3 3
1 4
0 5
0 0
0 0
11 05:15 PM
1 4
0 5
0 0
1 1
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
10 Total Volume
3 15
0 18
0 0
5 5
1 17
1 19
0 1
0 1
43 % App. Total
16.7 83. 3
0 0
0 100
5.3 89 .5
5.3 0
100
0 PHF
. 750
.536
.000
.563
.000
. 000
.417
.417
.250
.850
.250
.792
.000
.250
.000
.250
.768
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
C-
.
01 0 ,
o
o
� C
o)
c
2 5
LL
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
22 18
40 o
15 3
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
47 14
Left Thru Right
17 15
19 34
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
2 o
c,
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
+0 mins.
1 7
0 8
0 0
1 1
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
+ 15 mins.
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 5
1 6
0 0
0 0
+30 mins.
1 2
0 3
0 0
3 3
1 4
0 5
0 0
0 0
+ 45 mins.
1 4
0 5
0 0
1 1
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
3 15
0 18
0 0
5 5
1 17
1 19
0 1
0 1
% App. Total
16.7 83. 3
0 0
0 100
5.3 89 .5
5.3 0
100
0 PHF
.750
.536
. 000
.563
.000
.000
.417
.417
.250
.850
.250
.792
.000
.250
.000
.250
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Frank Sinatra Dri ve
Westbound
Groups Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Total
05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h %
Total %
-44
Right RTOR
A. Total
o 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
2 o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 2
50 50 0
16.7 16.7 0 33. 3
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o o 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 o
0 0
0 o o 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 1
0 0 0
0 0 2
1 0 1
0 0 1
3 1 0 4
o o 0 0 0
o o o o o
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 3 1 0 4
0 75 25
0 50 16 .7 66 .7
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A . Total E xclu. Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o o 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o o 0 0 o
o o o
o o o
0 I nclu. Total
Int . Total
0 0
0 0
1 2
2 1
1 2
2 1
o
0 0
0 0
o
0 0
0 0
o
0 0
0 0
0 6 6
0 100
�l
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru I Right f App. Total
Left
Thru Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
2 04:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 05:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 05:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total Volume
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
3 % App. Total
100
0 0
0 0
0 0
50 50
0 0
0 PHF
.250
.000
.000
.250
. 000
. 000
. 000
.000
.000
.250
.250
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.375
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
0 o
o
� C
o)
c
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
2 o
o
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
3 Axle Vehicles
47 14
Left Thru Right
o
o
2 2
o
O ut In To tal
Hinhwav 111
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
+0 mins.
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
+ 15 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
+ 30 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+45 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
% App. To tal
100
0 0
0 0
0 0
50 50
0 0
0 PHF
.250
.000
.000
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
:250
.250
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
-44
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Highway 111
Southbound
Thru
Frank Sinatra Dri ve
Westbound
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Trucks
Highway 111
Northbound
Thru
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No :1
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Total
05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
Grand Total
Apprc h %
Total %
OD
Right RTOR
A. Total
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
o o 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 2 0 0 2
0 100 0
0 40 0
40 Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A.. . Total
1 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1
100 0 0
20 0 0
20 Left
Ri • ht
RTOR
Total
o o 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 2 0 0 2
0 100 0
0 40 0
40 Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
A•.., Total E xclu. Total
o o 0 0 o
o o 0 0 o
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 o
o o o
o o o
0 I nclu. Total
0 o 1 1
o o o
o 1 1
1 Int . Total
1 o 1 1
0 1 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 2
0 5 5
0 100
V
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru I Right f App. Total
Left
Thru Right f App . Total
Pe ak Hour Analysis From 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Pe ak Hour for Entire Inte rsection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 04:45 PM
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 05:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 05:15 PM
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 Total Volume
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
3 % App. Total
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
PHF
.000
.500
.000
.500
. 000
. 000
. 000
.000
.000
.250
.000
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.750
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
0 o
o
o)
c
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
2 o
2 o
Right Thru Left
3 Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
4+ Axle Trucks
47 14
Left Thru Right
0 0
2 3
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
2 o
o
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra PM
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/11/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 04:30 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
04:30 PM
+0 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+15 mins.
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+ 30 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
+ 45 mins.
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
0 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
% App. Total
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
PHF
.000
.500
.000
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
.000
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
rouos Printed- Pass enger Vehicles - Large 2 Axle Vehicles - 3 Axle Vehicles - 4+ Axle Trucks File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
N orthbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Le ft
Thru
Right I RTOR
App. Total
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. T otal
E xclu. Tot al I I nclu. Total
Int . Total
10:00 AM
48 236
5 1
289
35 1
61 50
97 2
194
24 6
220
8 9
8 0
25 57
631
688
10:15 AM
37 237
4 0
278
51 7
45 39
103
3 190
25 4
218
3 11
4 0
18 43
617
660
10:30 AM
33 265
4 2
302
30 1
55 46
86 5
202
22 2
229
9 7
4 0
20 50
637
687
10:45 AM
38 276
7 1
321
38 1
63 52
102
9 206
29 4
244
2 12
5 0
19 57
686
743
Total
156
1014
20 4
1190
154
10 224
187
388
19 792
100
16 911
22 39
21 0
82 207
2571
2778
11:00 AM
47 294
4 0
345
36 5
37 26
78 8
227
29 4
264
9 8
3 0
20 30
707
737
11:15 AM
49 277
8 0
334
36 5
59 52
100
8 255
26 3
289
6 10
4 0
20 55
743
798
11:30 AM
54 310
6 2
370
35 10
54 49
99 9
283
31 5
323
7 8
3 0
18 56
810
866
11:45 AM
44 291
7 1
342
37 8
47 44
92 12
252
31 2
295
7 5
3 0
15 47
744
791
Total
194
1172
25 3
1391
144
28 197
171
369
37 1017
117
14 1171
29 31
13 0
73 188
3004
3192
12:00 PM
45 277
5 0
327
32 4
44 42
80 7
245
39 4
291
9 4
2 0
15 46
713
759
12:15 PM
50 225
6 1
281
35 4
44 23
83 10
229
20 1
259
6 9
4 0
19 25
642
667
X2:30 PM
51 288
9 0
348
39 3
55 45
97 8
268
49 3
325
8 8
3 0
19 48
789
837
2:45 PM
52 277
11 4
340
34 11
55 42
100
9 280
28 4
317
9 6
3 0
18 50
775
825
To tal
OD
198
1067
31 5
1296
140
22 198
152
360
34 1022
136
12 1192
32 27
12 0
71 169
2919
3088
1:00 PM
43 285
7 2
335
34 13
41 37
88 12
236
25 3
273
4 9
2 0
15 42
711
753
1:15 PM
43 281
10 1
334
38 7
50 41
95 11
265
17 3
293
7 7
3 0
17 45
739
784
01:30 PM
50 275
11 1
336
34 6
34 29
74 14
273
20 3
307
5 12
4 0
21 33
738
771
01:45 PM
52 330
8 0
390
35 2
35 31
72 11
304
33 3
348
3 14
2 0
19 34
829
863
Total
188
1171
36 4
1395
141
28 160
138
329
48 1078
95 12
1221
19 42
11 0
72 154
3017
3171
Grand Total
736
4424
112
16 5272
579
88 779
648
1446
138
3909
448
54 4495
102
139
57 0
298
718
11511
12229
Apprch %
14 83.9
2. 1
40 6. 1
53.9 3.1
87 10
34 .2
46.6 19 .1
Total %
6.4 38.4
1 45. 8
5 0.8
6.8 12. 6
1.2 34
3.9 39
0.9 1 .2
0.5 2.6
5 .9
94.1 Passe nger Vehicles
729
4373
110
5226
575
85 771
2074
138
3859
444
4495
100
136
55 291
0 0
12086
% Pa sse nge r Ve hide s
99 98.8
98. 2
87. 5
98.8 99. 3
96. 6
99 99. 2
99 100
98.7 99.1
100
98.8 98
97.8 96 .5
0 97 .7
0 0
98 .8
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
7 44
2 55
4 3
6 17
0 37
4 41
2 3
2 7
0 0
120
% Large 2a zle Vehic le s
1 1
1.8 12.5
1 0.7
3.4 0.8
0.6 0.8
0 0. 9
0.9 0
0.9 2
2 .2
3.5 0
2.3 0
0 1
3 Axle Vehicles
0 1
0 1
0 0
2 3
0 3
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 % 3 Ax le Vehicles
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.3
0.2 0.1
0 0.1
0 0
0.1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 .1
4+ Axle Trucks
0 6
0 6
0 0
0 0
0 10
0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
16 % 4+ Axle Trucks
0 0.1
0 0
0.1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0. 3
0 0
0 .2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 .1
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 2
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour fo r Entire Intersection Begins at 01:00 PM
01:00 PM
43 285
7 335
34 13
41 88
12 236
25 273
4 9
2 15
711
01:15 PM
43 281
10 334
38 7
50 95
11 265
17 293
7 7
3 17
739
01:30 PM
50 275
11 336
34 6
34 74
14 273
20 307
5 12
4 21
738
01:45 PM
52 330
8 390
35 2
35 72
11 304
33 348
3 14
2 19
829
Total Volume
188
1171
36 1395
141
28 160
329
48 1078
95 1221
19 42
11 72
3017
% App. Total
13.5 83. 9
2.6 42 .9
8.5 48.6
3.9 88 .3
7 .8
26 .4
58.3 15.3
PHF
.904
.887
.818
.894
.928
.538
.800
.866
.857
.887
.720
.877
.679
/50
.688
.857
.910
Int. Total
Cb
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
W
Cb
01 o
o
C
B
LL O
o
oo
N
N
7 Highway 111
Out In T otal
1257
1395
2652
36 1171
188
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 01:00 PM
Passenger Vehicl es
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
3 Axle Vehicles
4+ Axle Trucks
47 14
Left Thru Right
48 1078
95 1323
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
1221
2544
2 -
01 a
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 3
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 4
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
01:00 PM
10:00 AM
01:00 PM
10:00 AM
+0 mins.
43 285
7 335
35 1
61 97
12 236
25 273
8 9
8 25
+ 15 mins.
43 281
10 334
51 7
45 103
11 265
17 293
3 11
4 18
+ 30 mins.
50 275
11 336
30 1
55 86
14 273
20 307
9 7
4 20
+45 mins.
52 330
8 390
38 1
63 102
11 304
33 348
2 12
5 19
Total Volume
188
1171
36 1395
154
10 224
388
48 1078
95 1221
22 39
21 82
% App. Total
13.5 83. 9
2. 6
39 .7
2.6 57.7
3.9 88 .3
7.8 26 .8
47.6 25 .6
PHF
.904
.887
.818
.894
.755
.357
.889
.942
.857
.887
.720
.877
.611
.813
.656
.820
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
roues Printed- Passenger Vehicles
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Le ft
Thru
Right I RTOR
App. Total
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. T otal
E xclu. Tot al I l nclu. Total
Int . Total
10:00 AM
47 223
5 1
275
35 1
60 50
96 2
191
24 6
217
7 8
7 0
22 57
610
667
10:15 AM
37 233
4 0
274
51 7
45 39
103
3 188
25 4
216
3 11
4 0
18 43
611
654
10:30 AM
33 262
3 1
298
28 1
54 46
83 5
199
21 2
225
9 6
3 0
18 49
624
673
10:45 AM
38 273
7 1
318
38 0
63 52
101
9 204
29 4
242
2 12
5 0
19 57
680
737
Total
155
991
19 3
1165
152
9 222
187
383
19 782
99 16
900
21 37
19 0
77 206
2525
2731
11:00 AM
47 291
4 0
342
36 5
37 26
78 8
225
29 4
262
9 8
3 0
20 30
702
732
11:15 AM
47 275
8 0
330
35 5
59 52
99 8
253
26 3
287
6 10
4 0
20 55
736
791
11:30 AM
54 307
6 2
367
34 10
54 49
98 9
280
31 5
320
7 8
3 0
18 56
803
859
11:45 AM
44 287
7 1
338
37 8
46 43
91 12
251
31 2
294
7 5
3 0
15 46
738
784
Total
192
1160
25 3
1377
142
28 196
170
366
37 1009
117
14 1163
29 31
13 0
73 187
2979
3166
12:00 PM
45 274
5 0
324
32 3
44 42
79 7
240
38 4
285
9 4
2 0
15 46
703
749
12:15 PM
49 225
5 0
279
35 3
43 22
81 10
228
20 1
258
6 9
4 0
19 23
637
660
2:30 PM
51 285
9 0
345
39 3
55 45
97 8
262
48 3
318
7 8
3 0
18 48
778
826
2:45 PM
51 273
11 4
335
34 11
54 42
99 9
276
28 4
313
9 5
3 0
17 50
764
814
To tal
196
1057
30 4
1283
140
20 196
151
356
34 1006
134
12 1174
31 26
12 0
69 167
2882
3049
CC).
1:00 PM
42 283
7 2
332
34 13
40 36
87 12
232
25 3
269
4 9
2 0
15 41
703
744
1:15 PM
43 280
10 1
333
38 7
49 40
94 11
261
17 3
289
7 7
3 0
17 44
733
777
01:30 PM
49 274
11 1
334
34 6
34 29
74 14
269
20 3
303
5 12
4 0
21 33
732
765
01:45 PM
52 328
8 0
388
35 2
34 30
71 11
300
32 3
343
3 14
2 0
19 33
821
854
Total
186
1165
36 4
1387
141
28 157
135
326
48 1062
94 12
1204
19 42
11 0
72 151
2989
3140
Grand Total
729
4373
110
14 5212
575
85 771
643
1431
138
3859
444
54 4441
100
136
55 0
291
711
11375
12086
Apprch %
14 83.9
2. 1
40. 2
5. 9
53. 9
3.1 86.9
10 34 .4
46.7 18.9
Total %
6.4 38. 4
1 45. 8
5.1 0.7
6.8 12.6
1.2 33.9
3 .9
39 0.9
1 .2
0.5 2.6
5 .9
94 .1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru Right I App . Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 01:00 PM
01:00 PM
42 283
7 332
34 13
40 87
12 232
25 269
4 9
2 15
703
01:15 PM
43 280
10 333
38 7
49 94
11 261
17 289
7 7
3 17
733
01:30 PM
49 274
11 334
34 6
34 74
14 269
20 303
5 12
4 21
732
01:45 PM
52 328
8 388
35 2
34 71
11 300
32 343
3 14
2 19
821
Total Volume
186
1165
36 1387
141
28 157
326
48 1062
94 1204
19 42
11 72
2989
% App. Total
13.4 84
2. 6
43.3 8. 6
48. 2
4 88. 2
7.8 26 .4
58.3 15 .3
PHF
. 894
.888
. 818
.894
. 928
.538
. 801
. 867
.857
. 885
.734
.878
.679
.750
.688
.857
.910
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
o
o
C
C
in
N
LL O
N
m
7 Highway 111
Out In T otal
1238
1387
2625
36 1165
186
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 01:00 PM
Passenger Vehicl es
47 14
Left Thru Right
48 1062
94 1317
O ut In To tal
Hiahwav 111
1204
2521
r
2 N
-
rn
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
+0 mins.
42 283
7 332
34 13
40 87
12 232
25 269
4 9
2 15
+ 15 mins.
43 280
10 333
38 7
49 94
11 261
17 289
7 7
3 17
+ 30 mins.
49 274
11 334
34 6
34 74
14 269
20 303
5 12
4 21
+45 mins.
52 328
8 388
35 2
34 71
11 300
32 343
3 14
2 19
Total Volume
186
1165
36 1387
141
28 157
326
48 1062
94 1204
19 42
11 72
% App. Total
13.4 84
2. 6
43 .3
8.6 48 .2
4 88 .2
7 .8
26 .4
58.3 15 .3
PHF
.894
.888
.818
.894
.928
.538
.801
.867
.857
.885
.734
.878
.679
.750
.688
.857
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Large 2 Axle Vehicles
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Le ft
Thru
Right I RTOR
App. Total
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
E xclu. Total
I nclu. Total
Int . Total
10:00 AM
1 12
0 0
13 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 1
1 1
0 3
0 18
18 10:15AM
0 4
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
5 10:30 AM
0 3
1 1
4 2
0 1
0 3
0 2
1 0
3 0
1 1
0 2
1 12
13 10:45 AM
0 2
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 1
0 2
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
5 Total
1 21
1 1
23 2
1 1
0 4
0 7
1 0
8 1
2 2
0 5
1 40
41 11:00 AM
0 2
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 11:15AM
2 1
0 0
3 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
4 11:30 AM
0 2
0 0
2 1
0 0
0 1
0 3
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
6 11:45 AM
0 3
0 0
3 0
0 1
1 1
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 5
6 Total
2 8
0 0
10 2
0 1
1 3
0 4
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
1 17
18 12:00 PM
0 3
0 0
3 0
1 0
0 1
0 3
1 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
8 12:15 PM
1 0
1 1
2 0
1 1
1 2
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 5
7 X2:30 PM
0 3
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
1 0
5 1
0 0
0 1
0 9
9 C42:45 PM
1 3
0 0
4 0
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 0
3 0
1 0
0 1
0 9
9 To tal
co
1:00 PM
2 1
9 2
1 0
1 0
12 3
0 0
2 0
2 0
1 0
4 0
0 0
11 4
2 0
0 0
13 4
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
2 0
31 7
33 7
1:15 PM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
1 1
0 4
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
1 6
7 01:30 PM
1 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
6 01:45 PM
0 2
0 0
2 0
0 1
1 1
0 3
1 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
1 7
8 Total
2 6
0 0
8 0
0 2
2 2
0 15
1 0
16 0
0 0
0 0
2 26
28 Grand Total
7 44
2 2
53 4
3 6
4 13
0 37
4 0
41 2
3 2
0 7
6 114
120
Apprch %
13. 2
83 3. 8
30. 8
23. 1
46.2 0
90 .2
9.8 28 .6
42.9 28.6
Total %
6.1 38. 6
1.8 46. 5
3.5 2.6
5.3 11.4
0 32.5
3.5 36
1.8 2.6
1.8 6.1
5 95
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru Right I App . Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 01:00 PM
01:00 PM
1 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
7 01:15 PM
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 1
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
6 01:30 PM
1 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
6 01:45 PM
0 2
0 2
0 0
1 1
0 3
1 4
0 0
0 0
7 Total Volume
2 6
0 8
0 0
2 2
0 15
1 16
0 0
0 0
26 % App. Total
25 75
0 0
0 100
0 93.8
6. 2
0 0
0 PHF
.500
.750
. 000
.667
.000
. 000
. 500
.500
.000
.938
.250
1.00 .000
.000
.000
.000
.929
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
O
o
o
� C
o)
C
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
17 8
25 o
6 2
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 01:00 PM
Large 2 Axle Vehicles
47 14
Left Thru Right
0 15
16 22
Out In To tal
Hiahwav 111
2 o
v,
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaaroach Be ins at:
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
+0 mins.
1 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
+ 15 mins.
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 1
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
+30 mins.
1 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
+45 mins.
0 2
0 2
0 0
1 1
0 3
1 4
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
2 6
0 8
0 0
2 2
0 15
1 16
0 0
0 0
% App. Total
25 75
0 0
0 100
0 93 .8
6.2 0
0 0
PHF
.500
.750
. 000
.667
.000
.000
.500
.500
.000
.938
.250
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
roues Printed- 3 Axle Vehicles
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Dri ve
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right I RTOR
App. Total
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
E xclu. Total
I nclu. Total
Int . Total
10:00 AM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 10:15AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10:30 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 11:00 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 11:15AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 11:30 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 11:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 12:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 12:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 X2:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 C42:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 To tal
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 C41:00 PM
1:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
01:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0,
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
2 Grand Total
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 2
1 2
0 3
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
1 6
7 Apprch %
0 100
0 0
0 100
0 100
0 0
0 0
Total `)/0
0 16. 7
0 16. 7
0 0
33.3 33.3
0 50
0 50
0 0
0 0
14 .3
85.7 Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru Right I App . Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 01:00 PM
01:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 01:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total Volume
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 % App. Total
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
PHF
.000
.000
. 000
.000
.000
. 000
. 250
. 250
.000
. 000
. 000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
O
o
o
� C
o)
c
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
o
o
o
o
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 01:00 PM
3 Axle Vehicles
47 14
Left Thru Right
o
0 o
0 0
0 O ut In To tal
Hinhwav 111
2 o
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
+0 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+ 15 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+ 30 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+45 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
% A pp. Total
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 0
PHF
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
.250
000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
01 Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- 4+ Axle Truc
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No :1
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Dri ve
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatr a Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right I RTOR
App. Total
L eft
Thru
Right
RTOR
App . Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
RTOR
App. Total
E xclu. Total
I nclu. Total
Int . Total
10:00 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10:15AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 10:30 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 10:45 AM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 Total
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 11:00 AM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 11:15AM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 11:30 AM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 11:45 AM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 Total
0 4
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 7
7 12:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 12:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 X2:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 C42:45 PM
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 To tal
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
5 "4;1:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 Grand Total
0 6
0 0
6 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
0 0
10 0
0 0
0 0
0 16
16 Apprch %
0 100
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
Total `)/0
0 37. 5
0 37. 5
0 0
0 0
0 62.5
0 62 .5
0 0
0 0
0 100
Highway 111
Southbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Westbound
Highway 111
Northbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru I Right App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App. Total
Left
Thru I Right I App . Total
Left
Thru Right I App . Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 01:00 PM
01:00 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:15 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:30 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 01:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 Total Volume
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 % App. Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
PHF
.000
.000
. 000
.000
.000
. 000
. 000
. 000
.000
. 250
. 000
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
Int . Total
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
0 o
o
� C
o)
c
2 5
" O
o
Highway 111
Out In T otal
o
o
o
o
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Pe ak Hour Begins at 01:00 PM
4+ Axle Trucks
47 14
Left Thru Right
o
o
0 2
o
o
O ut In To tal
Hinhwav 111
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 2
Counts Unlimited
PO Box 1178
Cor ona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Hwy 111_Frank Sinatra SAT
Site Code : 05119831
Start Date : 12/7/2019
Page No : 3
Highway 111
S outhbound
Fr ank Sin atr a Drive
W estbound
Highway 111
Northb ound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Left
Thru Right I App. Total
L eft
Thru Right
App . Total
Left
Thru Right
App. Total
Pe ak Ho ur Analysis Fro m 01:00 PM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Ho ur fo r Each Aaproach Be ins at:
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
01:00 PM
+0 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+15 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+30 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
+45 mins.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
Total Volume
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
% App. Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 100
0 0
0 0
PHF
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.250
.000
.250
.000
.000
.000
.000
Int . Total
Location: Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
PEDESTRIANS
Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
North Leg
Highway 111
Pedestrians
East Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
South Leg
Highway 111
Pedestrians
West Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 4
4 0
8 0
3 6
2 2
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 0
0 3
3 0
0 2
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 2
1 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 14
10 0
24 Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
North Leg
Highway 111
Pedestrians
East Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
South Leg
Highway 111
Pedestrians
West Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 0
1 0
1 1
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 1
3 0
4 Date: 12/7/2019
Day: Saturday
North Leg
Highway 111
Pedestrians
East Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
South Leg
Highway 111
Pedestrians
West Leg
Frank Sinatra Drive
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
6 8
2 0
5 0
0 4
0 0
0 6
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 0
0 4
4 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 3
TOTAL VOLUMES:
3 10
19 3
35 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Location: Rancho Mirage
N/S: Highway 111
E/W: Frank Sinatra Drive
BICYCLES
Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
Southbound
Highway 111
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Highway 111
Eastbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
3 Date: 12/11/2019
Day: Wednesday
Southbound
Highway 111
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Highway 111
Eastbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Left
Thru
Right
Lef
Thru
Right
Le
Thru
Right
Le
Thru
Right
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
3 Date: 12/7/2019
Day: Saturday
Southbound
Highway 111
Westbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Northbound
Highway 111
Eastbound
Frank Sinatra Drive
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES:
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
3 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
1400
City of Rancho Mirage
Frank Sinatra Drive
W/ Highway 111
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
RNMFSW111
Site Code: 051-19831
Start 12/7/2019 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time
Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
12:15
12:30
9 7
4 16
21 18
4 2
1 17
25 17
12:45
2 19
22 74
2 30
9 89
31 163
01:00
1 16
0 29
01:15
0 22
4 27
01:30
1 24
0 30
01:45
2 22
4 84
1 18
5 104
9 188
02:00
2 13
1 25
02:15
1 18
0 26
02:30
0 14
1 30
02:45
1 20
4 65
1 29
3 110
7 175
03:00
1 11
0 28
03:15
1 16
1 26
03:30
0 23
1 31
03:45
0 20
2 70
1 28
3 113
5 183
04:00
2 16
1 30
04:15
0 28
0 32
04:30
1 18
0 19
04:45
2 10
5 72
6 24
7 105
12 177
05:00
6 24
2 22
05:15
4 24
3 16
05:30
0 18
7 15
05:45
4 20
14 86
10 10
22 63
36 149
06:00
2 18
7 14
06:15
5 18
7 13
06:30
2 19
8 18
06:45
8 16
17 71
21 13
43 58
60 129
07:00
12 15
15 10
07:15
7 13
13 9
07:30
12 16
16 12
07:45
19 8
50 52
33 12
77 43
127
95 08:00
9 12
17 8
08:15
16 9
20 10
08:30
14 11
7 8
08:45
16 20
55 52
20 20
64 46
119
98 09:00
26 15
20 12
09:15
16 3
17 14
09:30
16 13
10 8
09:45
22 8
80 39
21 6
68 40
148
79 10:00
17 16
8 13
10:15
20 17
10 12
10:30
16 16
12 7
10:45
19 20
72 69
14 11
44 43
116
112
11:00
20 8
12 5
11:15
20 11
23 5
11:30
16 16
20 4
11:45
13 2
69 37
22 2
77 16
146
53 Total
Combined
Total
AM Peak
Vol.
P.H.F.
PM Peak
Vol.
P.H.F.
Percentag
e
394
1165
771
09:00
80 0.769
- 03:30
- 87
0.777
394
1165
771
422
1252
830
07:30
86 0.652
03:30
121
0.945
33.8% 66.2% 33.7% 66.3%
422
1252
830
816
2417
1601
1401
City of Rancho Mirage
Frank Sinatra Drive
W/ Highway 111
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]