Agenda packet — Roseville City Council, April 16, 2025 (part 23 of 27)

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-020-047-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 127 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-048-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 128 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-049-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 129 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-050-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 130 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-051-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 131 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-052-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 132 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-053-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 133 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-054-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 134 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-055-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 135 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-056-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 136 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-057-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 137 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-058-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 138 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-059-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 139 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-060-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 140 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-061-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 141 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-062-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 142 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-063-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 143 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-064-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 144 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-065-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 145 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-066-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 146 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-020-067-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 147 SILVERADO VILLAGE UNIT 2 PH B S-39 480-030-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 48 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 49 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 50 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 52 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 53 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 54 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 55 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 56 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 57 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 58 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 59 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 94 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 95 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 96 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 97 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 98 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 99 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 100 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 101 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 102 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 103 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 104 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 105 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 106 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 113 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 114 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 115 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 116 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 117 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-030-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 51 & X SILVERADO OAKS UT #7 PH A T-77 480-040-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 36 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 37 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 38 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 39 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 40 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 41 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 Willdan Financial Services Page 73 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-040-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 42 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT #7 PH A MOR BK T PG 77 480-040-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 43 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 44 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 45 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 46 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 47 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 107 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 108 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 109 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 110 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 111 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 112 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 118 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 119 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 120 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 121 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 122 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 91 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 92 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-040-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 93 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 1 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 2 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 3 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 4 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 5 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 6 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 7 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 8 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 9 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 10 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 11 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 12 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 17 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 18 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 19 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 20 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LOT 13 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LTS 13 & 14 SILVERADO OAKSU NIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-050-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LT15&PORLTS14&16SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 A T-77 480-050-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LOT 16 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 21 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 22 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 23 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 24 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 25 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 26 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 27 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 28 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 29 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 30 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 31 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 32 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 33 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 34 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-060-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 35 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 60 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 61 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 Willdan Financial Services Page 74 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-070-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 62 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 63 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 64 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 65 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 66 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 67 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 68 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 69 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 70 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 71 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 72 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 73 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 74 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 75 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 76 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 77 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 78 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 79 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 80 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 81 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 82 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 83 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 84 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 85 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 86 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 87 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 88 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 89 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-070-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 90 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH A T-77 480-080-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 353A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 353B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 386A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 388 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 404 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 405 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 406 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 407 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 408 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 409 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 410A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 410B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 412 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 413 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 414 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 415 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 416 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 417 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 418 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 419 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 420 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 421 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 422 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 423 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 424 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 426A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 427 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-042-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 430 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 Willdan Financial Services Page 75 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-080-047-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LOT 387 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-051-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 390 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-053-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 411B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-055-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 425B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-057-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 431B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-060-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 428B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-062-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 429A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-080-064-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 386 B & POR 387 SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-065-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LTS 389B & 390 SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-066-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 389 A & POR 389 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-067-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 411 A & POR 411 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-068-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 425 A & POR 425 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-069-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 426 B & POR 431 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-070-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 431 A & POR 431 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-071-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 428 A & POR 428 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-080-072-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 429 B & POR 429 A SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-090-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 354 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 355 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 356 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 357 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 358 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 359 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 360 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 361 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 362 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 363 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 364 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 365 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 366 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 367 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 368 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 369 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 370 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 371 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 372A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 372B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 373 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 374 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 375 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 376 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 377 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 380 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 381 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 382 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 383 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 384 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 391 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-038-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 392 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-039-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 393 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-040-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 394 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-041-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 395 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-042-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 396 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-043-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 397A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-044-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 397B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-045-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 398 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-046-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 399 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-047-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 400 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 Willdan Financial Services Page 76 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-090-048-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 401 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-049-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 402 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-050-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 403 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-051-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LOT 378B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-053-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 379A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-055-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LT 385B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT 7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-057-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 378A POR 378B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F MOR T-82 480-090-058-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 379 B & POR 379 A SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-090-059-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 385 A & POR 385 B SILVERADO OAKS U7 PH F T-82 480-100-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 123A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 123B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 124 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 125 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 126 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 127 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 128 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 129 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 130 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 131A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 131B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 132 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 133 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 134 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 135 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 136 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 137 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 138 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 139 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 140 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 141 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 142A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 142B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 143A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 143B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 144 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 145 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 146 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 147 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 148 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 149 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 150 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 151A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 151B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 152 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-036-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 153 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 154A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-038-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 154B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-039-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 155 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-040-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 156 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-041-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 157 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-042-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 158 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-043-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 159 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-044-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 160A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-045-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 160B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-046-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 161 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-047-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 162A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-048-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 162B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 Willdan Financial Services Page 77 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-100-049-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 163 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-050-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 164 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-051-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 165 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-052-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 166 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-053-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 167A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-054-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 167B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-055-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 168 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-056-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 169 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-057-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 170 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-058-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 171 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-059-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 172 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-060-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 173 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-061-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 174 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-062-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 175 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-063-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 176A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-064-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 176B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-065-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 177A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-066-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 177B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-067-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 178 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-068-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 179 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-069-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 180 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-070-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 181 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-071-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 182 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-072-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 183 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-073-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 184 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-074-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 185 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-075-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 186 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-076-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 187 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-077-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 188 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-078-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 189A SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-100-079-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 189B SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PH B U-16 480-110-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 190 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 191 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 192 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 193 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 194 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 195 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 196 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 197 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 198 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 199 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 200 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 201 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 202 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 203 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 204 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 205 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 206 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 207 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 208 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 209 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 210 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 211 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 212 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 213 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 214 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 215 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 Willdan Financial Services Page 78 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-110-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 216 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 217 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 218 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 219 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 220 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 221 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 222 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 223 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 224 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-036-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 225 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 226 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-038-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 227 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-039-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 235 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-040-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 236 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-041-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 237 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-042-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 238 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-043-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 239 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-044-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 240 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-045-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 241 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-046-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 242 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-047-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 243 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-048-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 244 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-049-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 245 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-050-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 246 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-051-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 247 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-052-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 248 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-053-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 249 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-054-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 250 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-055-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 251 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-056-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 252 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-057-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 253 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-058-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 254 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-059-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 255 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-060-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 256 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-110-061-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 257 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 228 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 229 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 230 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 231 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 232 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 233 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 234 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 258 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 259 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 260 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 261 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 262 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 263 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 264 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 265 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 266 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 267 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 268 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 269 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 270 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 271 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 272 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 Willdan Financial Services Page 79 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-120-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 273 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 274 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 275 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 276 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 277 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 278 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 279 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 280 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 281 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 282 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 283 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 284 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 285 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-036-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 286 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-120-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 287 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 288 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 289 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 290 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 291 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 292 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 293 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 294 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 295 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 296 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 297 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 298 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 299 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 300 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 301 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 302 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 309 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 310 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 311 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 312 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 313 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 314 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 315 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 316 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 317 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 318 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 319 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 320 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 321 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 322 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 323 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 324 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 325 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-130-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 326 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 303 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 304 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 305 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 306 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 307 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 308 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 327 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 328 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 329 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 Willdan Financial Services Page 80 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-140-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 330 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 331 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 332 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 333 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 334 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 335 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 336 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 337 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 338 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 339 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 340 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 341 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 342 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 343 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 344 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 345 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 346 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 347 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 348 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 349 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-140-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 350 SILVERADO OAKS #7 PH C MOR U-52 480-150-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 450 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 451 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 452 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 453 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 454 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 455 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 456 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 457 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 458 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 459 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 460 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 461 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 462 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 463 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 464 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 465 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 466 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 467 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 468 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 469 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 470 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 471 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 472 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 473 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 474 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 475 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 476 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 477 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 478 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 479 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 480 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 481 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 482 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 483 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-150-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 484 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G BK V PG74 480-150-036-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 485 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 Willdan Financial Services Page 81 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-160-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 432 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G MOR V-74 480-160-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 433 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 434 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 435 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 436 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 437 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 438 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 439 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 440 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 441 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 442 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 443 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 444 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT #7 PHASE G MOR V-74 480-160-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 445 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 446 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 447 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 448 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 449 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 486 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 487 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 488 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 489 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 490 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 491 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 492 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 493 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 494 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 495 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 496 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 497 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 498 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 499 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 500 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 501 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 502 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-036-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 503 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-160-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 504 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 7 PHASE G V-74 480-170-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 21 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 22 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 23 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 24 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 25 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 26 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 27 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-170-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 28 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 29 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 30 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 31 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 32 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 33 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 34 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 35 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 36 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 37 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 38 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 39 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 40 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 Willdan Financial Services Page 82 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE MAXIMUM ASMT CHARGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Northwest Roseville Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
480-170-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 41 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 42 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 45 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 46 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 47 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 48 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 49 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-030-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 50 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-031-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 51 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-032-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 52 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-033-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 53 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-034-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 54 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-035-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 55 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-036-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 56 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-170-037-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 57 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-038-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 58 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-039-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 59 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-040-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 60 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-041-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 61 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BL V PG 75 480-170-042-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 62 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-043-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 63 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-044-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 64 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-045-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 65 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-046-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 66 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-047-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 67 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-048-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 68 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-052-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 POR LOT 43 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-170-053-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 44 & POR 43 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR V-75 480-180-001-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 69 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-002-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 70 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-003-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 71 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-004-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 72 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-005-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 73 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT #8 MOR V-75 480-180-006-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 74 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-007-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 75 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-008-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 76 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-009-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 77 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-010-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 78 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-011-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 79 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-012-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 80 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-013-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 81 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-014-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 82 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-015-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 90 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-016-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 91 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-017-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 92 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-018-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 93 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-019-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 94 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-020-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 95 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-021-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 96 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-022-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 97 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-023-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 98 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-024-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 99 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-025-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 100 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-026-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 101 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-027-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 102 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-028-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 103 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 480-180-029-000 Assessable A 100.00 100.00 LOT 104 SILVERADO OAKS UNIT NO 8 MOR BK V PG 75 Willdan Financial Services Page 83 of 84

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-122

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to seek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay for the annual costs of the improvements.

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting, park and hardscape areas including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, project identification signs, special street signs, special lighting for signage, granite entryways, sculptures and sculpture park, special paving materials, and other public improvements within the street right-of-way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements. 2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and any annexations thereto. The District is known and designated as the:
“Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District”
Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by the City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 5 Public Hearing(s): The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.

Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing this Resolution to be published once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 25-122
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2025.
,
Mayor
City of Roseville
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-123

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the district known and designated as the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and, WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and, WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within each Zone, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE OLYMPUS POINTE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:
a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’sReport. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 25-123
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2025.
,
Mayor
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590

51.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
City of Roseville

Olympus Pointe
Landscaping and Lighting District
FY 2025/26 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: April 16, 2025
Public Hearing: May 21, 2025

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

Olympus Pointe
Landscaping and Lighting District
City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California
This Report describes the District and any relevant zones therein, including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2025/26 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.

Reference is hereby made to the Placer County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this _____ day of _________, 2025
Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville
By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Project Manager
District Administration Services
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1 A. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION.....................................2 C. CLARIFICATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS .........................................2 D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT ...............................................3 E. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT.............................3 F. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS .........................5 G. DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES ...........................6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...................................................................... 7 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................7 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS................................................................................7 C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY............................................................9 D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA.......................................................11 E. BASE MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATES .............................................11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ............................................................................................12 A. FY 2025/26 BUDGET.............................................................................12 B. FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT RATES .....................................................13 C. FY 2025/26 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION .....................................13 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ...................................................13 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .......18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ......................................................20 APPENDIX B — FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT ROLL ............................................22 DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the certain public improvements within the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”) within the City. The District, which was formed in 1989, is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “1972 Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District boundaries, any new annexations, improvements maintained by the District and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026.

The District consists of two (2) benefit Zones (“Zones”). The improvements that benefit properties within each Zone and the costs associated with those improvements are identified and budgeted separately. Each parcel within a Zone is assessed proportionately for only those improvements and services that are a direct and special benefit to the properties within the respective Zone. The assessments are based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements that provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Placer County Assessor’s Office.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution, order the improvements to be made, if any, and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District and respective Zones for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025/26. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved by the City Council.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID (“Article XIIIC” and “Article XIIID”) and the provisions of the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act [Government Code Section 53750 and following] (the “Implementation Act”). Articles XIIIC and XIIID and the Implementation Act collectively are hereinafter referred to as “Proposition 218”.

The District’s Maximum Assessment Rates for all Zones and the Inflationary Adjustment Factor were previously approved and confirmed through property owner ballot proceedings and as such, comply with the provisions of Proposition 218.

C. CLARIFICATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
In order to increase consistency with the City’s other districts and to facilitate presentation within the Engineer’s Report, the names of both Zones were redesignated, commencing with FY 2007/2008, as follows:
• The “Non-Residential/Multi-Family Residential Zone” was redesignated to “Zone A.” (1)

• The “Residential Zone” was redesignated to “Zone D.” (2) (1) Prior to FY 2005/2006, this territory was known as “Zone A”. In FY 2005/2006, Zone A was redesignated to the “Non-Residential/Multi-Family Residential Zone”. (2) Prior to FY 2005/2006, this territory was known as “Zones B & C”. In FY 2005/2006, Zones B & C were combined and redesignated to the “Residential Zone”.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT
The Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District is located in the City of Roseville at the southerly edge of Placer County, northeast of the intersection of Interstate 80 and Douglas Boulevard. The site is generally bounded by Interstate 80 on the west, East Roseville Parkway and Olympus Drive to the north, Douglas Boulevard to the south and Sierra College Boulevard to the east. See Appendix A for a rendering of the District boundary map.

The District consists of two zones as described below. These zones were established by the City through a District reengineering commencing with the FY 2005/2006 levy. Additional information regarding the reengineering is provided in Section III of the Report.

Zone A
Zone A includes land zoned for non-residential and multi-family residential uses.

The Zone comprises the majority of the District and is primarily west and south of East Roseville Parkway, east of Interstate 80 and north of Douglas Boulevard. The territory that was originally designated as “Zone A” consisted of 581.78 assessable acres when it was redesignated as the “Non-Residential/Multi-Family Zone” commencing with the FY 2005/06 levy. It was then redesignated back to “Zone A” commencing with the FY 2007/08 levy.

Zone D
Zone D includes two single-family residential developments on the eastern side of the District. The Zone is bisected by Olympus Drive and Sierra College Boulevard on the District’s eastern boundary and includes 468 developed single-family residences. Originally, each residential development was designated as separate zone (Zones B and C). The area was redesignated as the “Residential Zone” commencing with the FY 2005/2006 levy and then redesignated to the “Zone D” commencing with the FY 2007/2008 levy.

E. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

F. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS
This District, through the levy special assessments, provides funding for the maintenance and operation of the following improvements located within the public rights-of-way and dedicated easements: project identification signs, including surrounding landscape and hardscape; special street materials; sculptures and sculpture park; special street signs; special lighting for the project identification signs and special illuminated street signs; and landscaped street medians (the “Improvements”). The specific locations of the improvements within the district are described as follows:

1. Zone A
a. Landscaped Median Islands:
• Eureka Road from Douglas Boulevard to Taylor Road Connector • Sunrise Avenue from southern boundary of the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan (the “NERSP”) to East Roseville Parkway
• East Roseville Parkway from Douglas Boulevard to Rocky Ridge Drive • Douglas Boulevard from eastern boundary of NERSP to Rocky Ridge Drive
b. Project identification signs (granite entryways) and special paving materials:
• Eureka Road at Douglas Boulevard
• East Roseville Parkway at Douglas Boulevard
• Eureka Road at Taylor Road
c. Sculpture and Sculpture Park:
• Aris Demetrio’s original sculpture located on Parcel 14 • Sculpture park (0.85 acres located on Parcel 14)
d. Special street signs:
• Eureka Road at Sunrise Avenue, Rocky Ridge Drive, Lead Hill Drive and Douglas Boulevard
• Lead Hill Drive at Rocky Ridge Drive
• Sunrise Avenue at Auto Mall entrance
• East Roseville Parkway at Taylor Road, Lead Hill Drive, Olympus Drive and Douglas Boulevard
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 • Olympus Drive at Sierra College Boulevard:

2. Zone D
a. Landscaped Frontage:
• Southern side of Olympus Drive from East Roseville Parkway to Sierra College Boulevard, excluding any landscaping not within or adjacent to the Zone
• Northern side of Olympus Drive from the Zone boundary (the former Zone C boundary), which is 175 feet southwest of Corniche Lane, to Sierra College Boulevard, western side of Sierra College Boulevard from Olympus Drive to the Zone boundary (the former Zone C boundary), which is approximately 600 feet.
b. Project identification signs and special paving materials:
• Sierra College Boulevard at Olympus Drive
G. DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the Improvements and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of Improvements or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the Improvements including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, mowing, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste.

Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the Improvements including any decorative lighting and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the special street signs.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by public agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of streetlights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities. Streets and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than the assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
In addition, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act require that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost for the proportional special benefit conferred to that parcel. Article XIIID and the Implementation Act further provide that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. They also require that publicly owned properties, which specifically benefit from the improvements, be assessed.

B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
The City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID and the Implementation Act for both the NonResidential/Multi-Family Zone (Zone A) and the Residential Zone (Zone D). Each Zone’s Improvements, the associated costs and assessments had been reviewed, identified, and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and Act.

All Improvements associated with these Zones have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties to their full potential. As such, these Improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these Improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the Improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the Improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within these Zones receives special benefit from the Improvements maintained and financed by the assessments. Specifically, the assessments associated with the Zones are for the maintenance of the Improvements installed as part of the original development of the parcels within the Zones. The desirability and security of properties within each Zone is enhanced by the close proximity of these amenities to those properties.

The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated costs to provide all necessary service, operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep the Zone Improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition.

The special benefits associated with these improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the Zones providing a positive representation of the area.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, and dust and debris control.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels within the Zones by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

All of the preceding special benefits allowed the property to be developed for the enjoyment of the property owners and contribute to an ongoing specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the Zones.

The improvements are for the special benefit, enhancement, and use of properties within the Zones. Although the improvements include public easements, rights-ofway, streets, and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the construction and installation of these Improvements were only necessary for the development of properties within the Zones and were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the Zone’s boundaries.

Therefore, any public access or use of the Improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Zones or to the public at large. In making this determination, it should be noted that all parkway and perimeter landscaping within the City is both funded and maintained by a special district, individual property owners or through some type of association.

C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
To establish the special benefit to the individual lots and parcels within the District an Equivalent Benefit Unit (“EBU”) system is used. The EBU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the Improvements are apportioned as a function of land use type, size, and development. Acreage of common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of a subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).

EBU Application Table
Land Use EBU per Unit/Acre
Single Family Residential 1.00 per Unit
Multi-Family Residential 1.00 per Acre
Non-Residential 1.00 per Acre
Exempt 0.00 per Acre
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10

1. Definitions and Formulas Related to the Product Type EBU Method Single-Family Residential — This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential parcel that is part of a final tract map.

Multi-Family Residential — This land use is defined as a residential parcel anticipated to have or has more than one residential unit.

Non-Residential — Parcels that are not considered Single Family Residential, Multi- Family Residential or Exempt.

Exempt Parcels — This land use identifies properties that are not assessed and are assigned 0.0 EBU per acre. This land use classification may include, but is not limited, to lots or parcels identified as public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas, greenbelts, parkways, park properties and other publicly owned properties that are part of the District Improvements.

These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the Improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

2. Zone Benefit Formula
The benefit formula applied to parcels within each Zone is based on the preceding Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) Application Table. Each parcel's EBU correlates the parcel’s special benefit received as compared to all other parcels benefiting from the Improvements.

The following formula is used to calculate the EBU for each parcel (proportional benefit).

Parcel Type EBU x Units/Acres = Parcel EBU
The total number of Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) is the sum of all individual EBUs applied to parcels within each Zone that receive a special benefit from the Improvements. An assessment amount per EBU (Assessment Rate) for each Zone is established by taking the total costs associated with the Zone’s Improvements and dividing that amount by the total number of EBUs within each Zone of all parcels benefiting from those Improvements. This Rate is then applied back to each individual parcel based on their assigned EBUs to determine the parcel’s proportionate special benefit and assessment obligation from those Improvements.

Zone Budget/ Total EBU = Assessment per EBU
Assessment per EBU x Parcel EBU = Maximum Parcel Assessment Amount DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
The purpose of establishing an Assessment Range Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments rather than initiating protest ballot proceedings to approve small increases in annual costs. This District provides for an annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate in an amount equal to three percent (3%).

The Maximum Assessment Rate is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment rate (less than or equal to this Maximum Assessment Rate) is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

Although the Maximum Assessment Rate will increase each year, the actual assessment rate may go up and down as compared to the previous year(s). The Maximum Assessment Rate adjustment is designed to allow for the adjustment of the annual assessment for inflation in order to maintain the original purchasing power of the District budget. The Maximum Assessment Rate calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to Proposition 218 balloting requirements.

E. BASE MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT RATES
The base assessment rates and the annual inflationary adjustment to each Zone are listed in the table below:

Zone Base Year
Base Year
Maximum
Assessment
Rate per EBU
Annual
Inflationary
Adjustment (1)
Zone A FY 2005/06 $296.65 3.00%
Zone D FY 2005/06 $99.76 3.00%
(1) The Annual Inflationary Adjustment commences with the Fiscal Year 2006/2007 assessments.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2025/26 BUDGET
Fund balance information of each Zone is reported in Section C on the following page.

The total balance to levy for the district is $236,613.82.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 B. FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT RATES
C. FY 2025/26 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS
Contract Maintenance - Landscaping – Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping improvements, DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 irrigation, and related drainage systems, as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”). The costs to maintain improvements within the District’s entryway areas are not included in this amount.

Contract Maintenance - Parks - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of park improvements, as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

Repair & Maintenance – Landscaping – Projected costs for repairs and/or maintenance of landscaping improvements. This would include work and materials not covered under contract maintenance.

Repair & Maintenance – Parks - Projected costs for repairs and/or maintenance of park improvements. This would include work and materials not covered under contract maintenance such as repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance – Lighting - This line item includes bulb replacement together and general maintenance together with repairs that are generally unforeseen.

Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work - This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portion of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Utilities Telecom – connectivity services required for the operation of certain improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures - Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Rehab Reserve Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumulate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or replacement of District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15

ADMINISTRATION COSTS
City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City Finance Department and other Departments in preparing the annual budget for the Engineer’s Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would also include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District, as well as costs to perform legal review of documents.

Contract Administration – Park’s Dept – Estimated Costs of Park and Recreation Department staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Consulting and Professional Services – Includes the costs and expenses of contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts and the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out-of-pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
Replenishment/(Use) of Operating Reserve – A “Replenishment” increases the levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. On the other hand, a “Use” of the Operating Reserve decreases the levy by drawing funds from the Operating Reserve for current year expenditures. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Operating Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Contribution for / (Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal year for each zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with any applicable adjustments to the budget as described above.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

Total Assessable Acreage - The total acreage within each zone expected to be assessed in the current fiscal year.

Total Assessable Units - The total number of assessable single-family units within each zone expected to be assessed in the current fiscal year.

Total Equivalent Benefit Units (“EBUs”) - Total assessable EBUs within the District for the current fiscal year. Each assessable parcel is assigned EBUs as shown in Section II C of this Report.

Applied Assessment Rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) - The assessment rate per EBU to be applied to the applicable Zone for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Assessment Rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) - The maximum assessment rate per EBU that can be applied to the applicable Zone for the current fiscal year.

Potential Maximum Assessment Per Zone – The total amount that can be assessed to all parcels within each Zone for the current fiscal year based upon the expected number of assessable units and acres.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Operating Reserve Balance 7-1-2025 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each Zone. These beginning balances shall be used to fund each Zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approximate six-month delay between the start of the District’s fiscal year and the receipt of the collections from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 Replenish from FY 2025/26 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2025/26 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six-month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2025 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2025. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2025/26 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2025/26 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of July 1, 2025 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2025. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6-30-2026 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2026. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six-months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.

REHABILITATION RESERVE
Beginning Rehab Reserve Balance 7-1-2025 (est.) — The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of July 1, 2025. Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Collect from FY 2025/26 Levy — This amount is added to the FY 2025/26 levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 restorations or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2025/26 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Ending Rehab Reserve Balance 6-30-2026 (est.) - The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of June 30, 2026. These funds shall be used to provide for future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Should the District have no Rehabilitation Reserve or related activity, the Rehabilitation Reserve information may not be presented in the Report.

E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

The Report provides a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures by Zone related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A. The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are shown in the table below.

Zone A
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19 Zone D
Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP
The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report.

These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a rendering of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 21 DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
FY 2025/26 Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District Page 22 APPENDIX B — FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, may be submitted to the City Clerk, under a separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and other property that cannot be developed, excepting common area parcels. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempt from assessment.

The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2025/26 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller.

The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
015-450-014-000 Non Residential A 252.68 583.47 0.0 1.089 1.09 1.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 27-1 015-450-015-000 Non Residential A 212.32 490.24 0.0 0.915 0.92 PAR 2 PMOR 27-1 015-450-024-000 Non Residential A 250.14 577.57 0.0 1.078 1.08 POR LOT 9 NORTHEAST PLAN #2P-97 015-450-027-000 Non Residential A 494.02 1,140.68 0.0 2.129 2.13 2.1 AC LOT 13 NORTHEAST PLAN#2P-97& FR 015-450-030-000 Non Residential A 237.14 547.57 0.0 1.022 1.02 1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 27-131 015-450-031-000 Non Residential A 437.40 1,009.95 0.0 1.885 1.89 1.9AC PAR 2 PMOR 27-131 015-450-042-000 Non Residential A 1,449.52 3,346.88 0.0 6.2467 6.25 1.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28 89 015-450-044-000 Non Residential A 281.86 650.82 0.0 1.2147 1.21 PAR 3 PMOR 28 89 015-450-057-000 Non Residential A 370.46 855.38 0.0 1.5965 1.60 TAYLOR RD 1905 ROS 1.6 AC POR PAR 4 PMOR 015-450-058-000 Non Residential A 463.06 1,069.21 0.0 1.9956 2.00 2.O AC POR PARS 1 2 & 4 PMOR 29-11 015-450-059-000 Non Residential A 671.46 1,550.40 0.0 2.8937 2.89 2.9 AC PAR 3 & POR PARS 1 2 & 4 PMOR 29-11 015-450-063-000 Non Residential A 423.38 977.59 0.0 1.8246 1.82 1.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-106 015-450-064-000 Non Residential A 557.08 1,286.31 0.0 2.4008 2.40 2.5 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-106 015-450-065-000 Non Residential A 445.66 1,029.02 0.0 1.9206 1.92 2.0 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-106 015-450-066-000 Non Residential A 623.94 1,440.67 0.0 2.6889 2.69 2.8 AC PAR 4 PMOR 29-106 015-450-079-000 Non Residential A 2,288.90 5,284.96 0.0 9.864 9.86 11.5 AC PAR 3 & 4 PMOR 27-131 & SEC 36 11 6 015-450-080-000 Non Residential A 387.92 895.72 0.0 1.6718 1.67 PAR A PMOR 32-133 015-450-083-000 Non Residential A 310.36 716.61 0.0 1.3375 1.34 PAR E PMOR 32-133 015-450-085-000 Non Residential A 1,008.66 2,328.94 0.0 4.3468 4.35 1.3AC PAR F PMOR 33-135 015-450-086-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - 16.1 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 28 89 046-070-006-000 MF Residential A 2,343.68 5,411.41 0.0 10.1 10.10 9.6 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-012-001-000 Non Residential A 11,485.18 26,518.57 0.0 49.495 49.50 53.2 AC PAR 4 PMOR 22-158 SBE# 2737-31-3 048-013-001-000 Non Residential A 466.48 1,077.08 0.0 2.0103 2.01 2.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-12 048-013-004-000 Non Residential A 638.72 1,474.80 0.0 2.7526 2.75 2.6 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-12 048-013-005-000 Non Residential A 319.36 737.40 0.0 1.3763 1.38 1.3 AC PAR 4 PMOR 29-12 048-013-006-000 Non Residential A 2,320.46 5,357.83 0.0 10.0 10.00 10.0AC POR PAR 2 & 3 PMOR 26-145 048-013-007-000 Non Residential A 232.04 535.78 0.0 1.0 1.00 1 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-20 048-013-008-000 Non Residential A 301.66 696.52 0.0 1.3 1.30 1.3 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-20 048-013-009-000 Non Residential A 90.72 209.49 0.0 0.391 0.39 PAR 4 PMOR 29-20 048-013-010-000 Non Residential A 232.04 535.78 0.0 1.0 1.00 1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-20 048-013-011-000 Non Residential A 1,284.24 2,965.24 0.0 5.5344 5.53 6.2 AC POR PAR 1 PMOR 32-28 048-013-012-000 MF Residential A 1,532.80 3,539.17 0.0 6.6056 6.61 7.4 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-013-013-000 Non Residential A 672.92 1,553.77 0.0 2.9 2.90 PAR 5 & POR 2 PMOR BK 29 PG 12 048-013-014-000 Non Residential A 649.72 1,500.19 0.0 2.8 2.80 POR PCL 2 PMOR BK 29 PG 12 048-021-016-000 Non Residential A 193.52 446.84 0.0 0.834 0.83 PAR A PMOR 27-157 048-021-017-000 Non Residential A 578.72 1,336.24 0.0 2.494 2.49 2.5 AC PAR B PMOR 27-157 048-021-018-000 Non Residential A 720.26 1,663.07 0.0 3.104 3.10 3.1 AC PAR C PMOR 27-157 048-021-019-000 Non Residential A 643.92 1,486.80 0.0 2.775 2.78 2.8 AC PAR D PMOR 27-157 048-021-020-000 Non Residential A 854.38 1,972.75 0.0 3.682 3.68 3.7 AC PAR E PMOR 27-157 048-021-021-000 Non Residential A 917.04 2,117.41 0.0 3.952 3.95 4.0 AC PAR F PMOR 27-157 City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
048-021-022-000 Non Residential A 497.26 1,148.18 0.0 2.143 2.14 2.1 AC PAR G PMOR 27-157 048-021-052-000 MF Residential A 2,927.48 6,759.38 0.0 12.6159 12.62 11.9 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-021-053-000 Non Residential A 98.40 227.23 0.0 0.4241 0.42 POR PAR 1 PMOR 32-28 048-451-003-000 Non Residential A 476.38 1,099.96 0.0 2.053 2.05 2.1 AC PAR 2 PMOR 27-36 SBE# 2748-31-31 048-451-004-000 Non Residential A 79.82 184.31 0.0 0.344 0.34 PAR 1 PMOR 27-36 048-451-005-000 Non Residential A 466.18 1,076.39 0.0 2.009 2.01 2 AC PAR 3 PMOR 27-36 048-451-006-000 Non Residential A 2,255.96 5,208.88 0.0 9.722 9.72 9.7AC PAR 4 PMOR 27-36 048-451-007-000 Non Residential A 140.38 324.15 0.0 0.605 0.61 PAR 18 PMOR 27-36 048-451-009-000 Park A - - 0.0 0.0 - PAR 5 PARK PMOR 27-36 048-451-010-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - 5.2AC PAR 6 COMMON AREA PMOR 27-36 048-451-011-000 Non Residential A 226.24 522.39 0.0 0.975 0.98 POR PAR 8 & 9 PMOR 27-36 048-451-012-000 Non Residential A 747.64 1,726.29 0.0 3.222 3.22 3.2 AC PAR 7 PMOR 27-36 048-451-013-000 Non Residential A 154.30 356.30 0.0 0.665 0.67 PAR 17 PMOR 27-36 048-451-014-000 Non Residential A 226.70 523.46 0.0 0.977 0.98 1AC PAR 16 PMOR 27-36 048-451-015-000 Non Residential A 370.80 856.18 0.0 1.598 1.60 1.6 AC POR PAR 14 & 15 PMOR 27-36 048-451-016-000 Non Residential A 997.80 2,303.87 0.0 4.3 4.30 4.3 AC POR PAR 8 & 9 PMOR 27-36 048-451-018-000 Non Residential A 312.34 721.22 0.0 1.3461 1.35 1.4 AC PAR 1 PMOR 29-23 048-451-019-000 Non Residential A 267.72 618.19 0.0 1.1538 1.15 1.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-23 048-451-020-000 Non Residential A 157.56 363.80 0.0 0.679 0.68 POR PAR 12 PMOR 27-36 048-451-022-000 Non Residential A 2,669.70 6,164.18 0.0 11.505 11.51 11.5 AC POR PAR 10 PMOR 27-36 048-451-024-000 Non Residential A 289.58 668.66 0.0 1.248 1.25 1.1 AC POR PAR 13 PMOR 27-36 048-451-026-000 Non Residential A 208.58 481.62 0.0 0.8989 0.90 POR PARS 14 & 15 PMOR 27-36 048-452-004-000 Non Residential A 2,513.52 5,803.60 0.0 10.832 10.83 10.8 AC L 6 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-005-000 Non Residential A 1,439.84 3,324.53 0.0 6.205 6.21 5.6 AC POR L9 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-006-000 Non Residential A 176.58 407.73 0.0 0.761 0.76 POR PAR 2 & 3 PMOR 28-73 048-452-007-000 Non Residential A 445.52 1,028.70 0.0 1.92 1.92 1.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-73 048-452-009-000 Non Residential A 3,039.82 7,018.76 0.0 13.1 13.10 13.1 AC POR PAR 4 PMOR 28-73 048-452-010-000 Non Residential A 974.58 2,250.29 0.0 4.2 4.20 4.2 AC POR PAR 4 PMOR 28-73 048-452-011-000 Non Residential A 538.58 1,243.55 0.0 2.321 2.32 1.7ACPOR L 9 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-012-000 Non Residential A 631.86 1,458.94 0.0 2.723 2.72 2.3 AC POR L 4 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-013-000 Non Residential A 421.38 972.98 0.0 1.816 1.82 2.2 AC P L 4 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-014-000 Non Residential A 812.16 1,875.24 0.0 3.5 3.50 3.5 AC L 5 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-015-000 Non Residential A 557.14 1,286.41 0.0 2.401 2.40 2.4 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 28-96 048-452-016-000 Non Residential A 1,170.44 2,702.49 0.0 5.044 5.04 5 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 28-96 048-452-017-000 Non Residential A 802.42 1,852.74 0.0 3.458 3.46 3.5 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-96 048-452-019-000 Non Residential A 1,781.42 4,113.21 0.0 7.677 7.68 7.7 AC PAR 2 & 3 PMOR 27-100 048-452-020-000 Non Residential A 617.70 1,426.25 0.0 2.662 2.66 2.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 27-100 048-452-021-000 Non Residential A 2,604.02 6,012.56 0.0 11.222 11.22 11.2 AC L 7 AUTOMALL Q-74 048-452-022-000 Non Residential A 450.86 1,041.03 0.0 1.943 1.94 1.9 AC PAR 4 PMOR 28-74 048-452-023-000 Non Residential A 619.32 1,430.00 0.0 2.669 2.67 2.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-74 Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
048-452-024-000 Non Residential A 268.70 620.44 0.0 1.158 1.16 1.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 28-74 048-452-025-000 Non Residential A 299.34 691.16 0.0 1.29 1.29 1.3 PAR 3 PMOR 28-74 048-452-026-000 Non Residential A 1,415.48 3,268.28 0.0 6.1 6.10 6.1 AC PAR 1 PMOR 35-36 048-452-027-000 Non Residential A 580.10 1,339.46 0.0 2.5 2.50 2.5 AC PAR 2 PMOR 35-36 048-452-028-000 Non Residential A 371.26 857.25 0.0 1.6 1.60 1.6 AC PAR 3 PMOR 35-36 048-460-023-000 Park A - - 0.0 0.0 - 1.9 AC LOT 15 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 048-460-024-000 Non Residential A 2,238.20 5,167.89 0.0 9.6455 9.65 7.3 AC LOT 16 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 048-460-025-000 Non Residential A 1,782.60 4,115.94 0.0 7.6821 7.68 5.8 AC LOT 17 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 048-460-026-000 Non Residential A 648.22 1,496.71 0.0 2.7935 2.79 2.1 AC LOT 18 STONE POINT SUBD NO 00-07 048-460-027-000 Open Space A - - 0.0 0.0 - 25.9 AC L19 OPN SP FLD PLAIN ACCESS BIKE 048-460-030-000 Non Residential A 1,406.20 3,246.84 0.0 6.06 6.06 4.6 AC P LOTS 2&3 STONE POINT SUBD 00-007 048-460-031-000 Non Residential A 1,436.36 3,316.50 0.0 6.19 6.19 4.7 AC LOT5& P LOTS3&4 STONE POINT SUBD00 048-460-032-000 Non Residential A 458.74 1,059.24 0.0 1.977 1.98 1.5 AC POR LOT 1 & 2 STONE POINT SUBD Y-64 048-460-034-000 MF Residential A 686.28 1,584.58 0.0 2.9575 2.96 3.3 AC POR PAR 2 PMOR 32-28 048-460-035-000 Non Residential A 415.94 960.39 0.0 1.7925 1.79 2.0 AC POR PAR 1 PMOR 32-28 048-460-036-000 Non Residential A 1,821.08 4,204.77 0.0 7.8479 7.85 5.9 AC PAR 1 PMOR 32-70 048-460-037-000 Non Residential A 274.68 634.26 0.0 1.1838 1.18 PAR 2 PMOR 32-70 048-460-038-000 Non Residential A 274.68 634.26 0.0 1.1838 1.18 PAR 3 PMOR 32-70 048-460-039-000 Non Residential A 1,728.46 3,990.94 0.0 7.4488 7.45 5.6 AC PAR 4 PMOR 32-70 048-460-058-000 Non Residential A 6,172.46 14,251.83 0.0 26.6 26.60 POR LOT 6, 7, 8 & 9 STONE POINT II MOR BK AA 456-290-001-000 Non Residential A 104.82 242.07 0.0 0.4518 0.45 UNT110-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-002-000 Non Residential A 34.92 80.64 0.0 0.1505 0.15 UNT115-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-003-000 Non Residential A 70.64 163.15 0.0 0.3045 0.30 UNT120-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-004-000 Non Residential A 80.38 185.60 0.0 0.3464 0.35 UNT130-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-005-000 Non Residential A 88.20 203.65 0.0 0.3801 0.38 UNT140-1ST FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-006-000 Non Residential A 92.50 213.62 0.0 0.3987 0.40 UNT210-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-007-000 Non Residential A 111.08 256.48 0.0 0.4787 0.48 UNT220-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-009-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - CMN ARA FLR 1 BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-010-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - CMN ARA FLR 2 BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-011-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LT C BLDG E AMD CONDO PL NORTH SUNRISE 456-290-012-000 Non Residential A 77.24 178.36 0.0 0.3329 0.33 UNT230-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-013-000 Non Residential A 73.38 169.47 0.0 0.3163 0.32 UNT240-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-290-014-000 Non Residential A 43.94 101.48 0.0 0.1894 0.19 UNT250-2ND FLR BLD E-N.SNRSE PROF CTR 456-300-007-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - PAR B COMMON AREA N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-015-000 Non Residential A 53.10 122.64 0.0 0.2289 0.23 UNIT 390 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-019-000 Non Residential A 61.36 141.71 0.0 0.2645 0.26 UNIT 330 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-020-000 Non Residential A 62.80 145.04 0.0 0.2707 0.27 UNIT 300 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-021-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOBBY COMMON AREA N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-022-000 Non Residential A 158.58 366.15 0.0 0.6834 0.68 UNIT 110 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-023-000 Non Residential A 57.52 132.82 0.0 0.2479 0.25 UNIT 180 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO Willdan Financial Services Page 3 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
456-300-026-000 Non Residential A 40.92 94.51 0.0 0.1764 0.18 UNIT 200 1ST AMNDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-027-000 Non Residential A 180.56 416.95 0.0 0.7782 0.78 UNIT 270 BLG B 1ST AMNDED N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-028-000 Non Residential A 59.98 138.50 0.0 0.2585 0.26 UNIT 290 BLG B 1ST AMNDED N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-029-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOBBY COMMON AREA N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-030-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOBBY COMMON AREA 1ST AMDED SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-300-031-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - UNIT 190 STORAGE AMNDED CONDO SUNRISE PROF CEN 456-300-032-000 Non Residential A 100.98 233.17 0.0 0.4352 0.44 UNIT350 AMENDED BLG B N SUNRISE PROF CEN CONDO 456-330-001-000 Non Residential A 113.72 262.59 0.0 0.4901 0.49 POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-002-000 Non Residential A 105.90 244.53 0.0 0.4564 0.46 POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-003-000 Non Residential A 168.30 388.60 0.0 0.7253 0.73 POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-004-000 Non Residenital A - - 0.0 0.0 - POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-005-000 Non Residenital A - - 0.0 0.0 - POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 456-330-006-000 Non Residenital A - - 0.0 0.0 - POR PAR D PMOR 32-133 459-010-001-000 Non Residential A 1,749.86 4,040.34 0.0 7.541 7.54 7.5 AC PAR A PMOR 25-64 459-010-002-000 Non Residential A 1,728.74 3,991.58 0.0 7.45 7.45 7.5 AC PAR B PMOR 25-64 459-010-003-000 Non Residential A 1,090.62 2,518.18 0.0 4.7 4.70 4.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 28-43 459-010-007-000 Non Residential A 603.54 1,393.57 0.0 2.601 2.60 2.6 AC PAR 2 PMOR 25-70 459-010-012-000 Non Residential A 573.14 1,323.38 0.0 2.47 2.47 2.5 AC PAR 14 DOUGLAS CENTER PH 1 S-98 459-010-019-000 Non Residential A 879.46 2,030.62 0.0 3.79 3.79 3.8 AC PAR 1 DOUGLAS CENTER PHASE 2 T-32 459-010-026-000 Non Residential A 432.68 999.07 0.0 1.8647 1.86 1.9 AC POR PAR 4 & 5 DOUGLAS CENTER PHASE 2 T-32 459-010-028-000 Non Residential A 614.86 1,419.72 0.0 2.6498 2.65 2.7 AC LT 9 T-32&POR LT 5 DOUGLAS CENTER PH 1 S-98 459-010-030-000 Non Residential A 175.66 405.59 0.0 0.757 0.76 PAR 1 PMOR T-94 459-010-031-000 Non Residential A 186.30 430.18 0.0 0.8029 0.80 PAR 2 PMOR T-94 459-010-040-000 Non Residential A 1,294.56 2,989.08 0.0 5.5789 5.58 5.5 AC PAR 13 DOUGLAS CENTER PH 3 U-89 459-010-041-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - 1.3 AC POR PAR A PMOR T-64 & PAR 8 DGLS CEN PHS-98 459-010-044-000 Non Residential A 2,212.54 5,108.64 0.0 9.5349 9.53 9.3AC PAR10 - 12 DOUGLAS CEN P 3 & POR P2 - 4 PH 2 459-010-047-000 Non Residential A 374.98 865.83 0.0 1.616 1.62 1.6 AC PAR A PMOR 30-17 459-010-048-000 Non Residential A 656.22 1,515.19 0.0 2.828 2.83 2.8 AC PAR B PMOR 30-17 459-010-049-000 Non Residential A 1,793.12 4,140.21 0.0 7.7274 7.73 7.7 AC PAR 1 PMOR 31-95 459-010-050-000 Non Residential A 1,443.80 3,333.64 0.0 6.222 6.22 6.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 31-95 459-010-051-000 Non Residential A 1,630.10 3,763.82 0.0 7.0249 7.02 7.0AC PAR3 PM 31-95 SBE# 2745-31-11,SBE 135-31-122 459-010-052-000 Non Residential A 1,676.68 3,871.35 0.0 7.2256 7.23 7.2 AC PAR 4 PMOR 31-95 459-010-053-000 Non Residential A 398.84 920.90 0.0 1.71881 1.72 1.8 AC PAR 1 PMOR 35-17 459-010-054-000 Non Residential A 421.00 972.07 0.0 1.81429 1.81 1.9 AC PAR 2 PMOR 35-17 459-020-001-000 Non Residential A 178.78 412.82 0.0 0.7705 0.77 PAR 1 BLDG 1 LAVA RIDGE PROF CEN S-102 459-020-003-000 Non Residential A 141.82 327.47 0.0 0.6112 0.61 PAR 3 BLDG 3 LAVA RIDGE PROF CEN S-102 459-020-006-000 Non Residential A 62.82 145.09 0.0 0.2708 0.27 UNIT 1 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-007-000 Non Residential A 74.06 171.02 0.0 0.3192 0.32 UNIT 2 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-008-000 Non Residential A 33.56 77.53 0.0 0.1447 0.14 UNIT 3 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 459-020-009-000 Non Residential A 26.32 60.81 0.0 0.1135 0.11 UNIT 4 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER CONDO BLD 2 Willdan Financial Services Page 4 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-020-010-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - BUILDING COMMON AREA 459-030-001-000 Non Residential A 145.48 335.94 0.0 0.627 0.63 PAR 4 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-002-000 Non Residential A 145.48 335.94 0.0 0.627 0.63 PAR 5 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-003-000 Non Residential A 231.58 534.71 0.0 0.998 1.00 PAR 6 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-004-000 Non Residential A 152.68 352.55 0.0 0.658 0.66 PAR 7 LAVA RIDGE PROF CENTER PH 2 T-70 459-030-006-000 Non Residential A 198.40 458.09 0.0 0.855 0.86 PAR 1 PMOR 29-147 459-030-007-000 Non Residential A 215.80 498.28 0.0 0.93 0.93 PAR 2 PMOR 29-147 459-030-008-000 Non Residential A 198.40 458.09 0.0 0.855 0.86 PAR 3 PMOR 29-147 459-040-001-000 Non Residential A 187.16 432.16 0.0 0.8066 0.81 PAR 1 PMOR 29-054 459-040-002-000 Non Residential A 157.50 363.69 0.0 0.6788 0.68 PAR 2 PMOR 29-054 459-040-003-000 Non Residential A 212.18 489.92 0.0 0.9144 0.91 PAR 3 PMOR 29-054 459-040-004-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - 1.8 AC PAR A COMMON AREA PMOR 29-054 459-040-005-000 Non Residential A 171.70 396.48 0.0 0.74 0.74 PAR 1 POR 29-77 459-040-006-000 Non Residential A 171.70 396.48 0.0 0.74 0.74 PAR 2 POR 29-77 459-040-007-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - 1.1 AC PAR 3 PMOR 29-77 COMMON AREA 459-040-008-000 Non Residential A 117.40 271.11 0.0 0.506 0.51 PAR 1 PMOR 29-146 459-040-009-000 Non Residential A 128.08 295.75 0.0 0.552 0.55 PAR 2 PMOR 29-146 459-040-010-000 Non Residential A 141.54 326.83 0.0 0.61 0.61 PAR 3 PMOR 29-146 459-040-011-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - 1.0 AC PARCEL A COMMON AREA PMOR 29-146 459-050-001-000 Non Residential A 281.26 649.42 0.0 1.2121 1.21 1.2 AC PAR 2 PMOR 29-87 459-050-002-000 Non Residential A 304.70 703.54 0.0 1.3131 1.31 1.3 AC PAR 4 PMOR 29-87 459-050-003-000 Non Residential A 295.50 682.32 0.0 1.2735 1.27 PAR A1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-004-000 Non Residential A 123.36 284.88 0.0 0.5317 0.53 PAR A2 PMOR 29-122 459-050-005-000 Non Residential A 295.50 682.32 0.0 1.2735 1.27 PAR A3 PMOR 29-122 459-050-007-000 Non Residential A 189.66 437.95 0.0 0.8174 0.82 PAR B1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-008-000 Non Residential A 94.04 217.15 0.0 0.4053 0.41 PAR B2 PMOR 29-122 459-050-009-000 Non Residential A 119.80 276.62 0.0 0.5163 0.52 PAR B3 PMOR 29-122 459-050-011-000 Non Residential A 282.10 651.35 0.0 1.2157 1.22 PAR C1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-012-000 Non Residential A 282.06 651.30 0.0 1.2156 1.22 PAR C2 PMOR 29-122 459-050-014-000 Non Residential A 614.90 1,419.77 0.0 2.6499 2.65 EUREKA RD 1544 STE 140 ROS PAR D1 PMOR 29-122 459-050-016-000 Non Residential A 705.14 1,628.14 0.0 3.0388 3.04 PAR 'A1' PMOR 29-142 459-050-018-000 Non Residential A 705.14 1,628.14 0.0 3.0388 3.04 PAR 'B1' PMOR 29-142 459-050-020-000 Non Residential A 816.44 1,885.15 0.0 3.5185 3.52 PAR 'C1' PMOR 29-142 459-070-001-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 1 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-002-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 2 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-003-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 3 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-004-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 4 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-005-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 5 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-006-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 6 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-007-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 7 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 Willdan Financial Services Page 5 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-070-008-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 8 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-009-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 9 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-010-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 10 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-011-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 11 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-012-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 12 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-013-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 13 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-014-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 14 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-015-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 15 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-016-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 16 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-017-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 17 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-018-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 18 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-019-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 19 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-020-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 20 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-021-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 21 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-022-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 22 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-023-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 23 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-024-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 24 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-025-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 25 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-026-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 26 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-027-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 27 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-028-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 28 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-029-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 29 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-030-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 30 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-031-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 31 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-032-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 32 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-033-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 33 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-034-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 34 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-035-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 35 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-036-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 36 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-037-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 37 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-038-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 38 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-039-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 39 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-040-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 40 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-041-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 41 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-042-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 42 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-043-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 43 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-044-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 44 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-045-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 45 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-046-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 46 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-047-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 47 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 Willdan Financial Services Page 6 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-070-048-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 48 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-049-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 49 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-050-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 50 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-051-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 51 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-052-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 52 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-053-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 53 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-054-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 54 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-055-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 55 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-056-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 56 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-057-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 57 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-058-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT C COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 459-070-059-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT D COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-060-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT E COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-061-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT F COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-062-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT G COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-063-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT H COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-064-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT M COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-065-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT O COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-070-066-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT P COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-001-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 58 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-002-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 59 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-003-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 60 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-004-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 61 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-005-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 62 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-006-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 63 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-007-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 64 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-008-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 65 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-009-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 66 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-010-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 67 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-011-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 68 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-012-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 69 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-013-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 70 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-014-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 71 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-015-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 72 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-016-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 73 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-017-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 74 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-018-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 75 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-019-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 76 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-020-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 77 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-021-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 78 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 Willdan Financial Services Page 7 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-080-022-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 79 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-023-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 80 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-024-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 81 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-025-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 82 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-026-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 83 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-027-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 84 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-028-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 85 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-029-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 86 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-030-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 89 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-031-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 90 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-032-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 91 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-033-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 92 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-034-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 93 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-035-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 94 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-036-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 95 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-037-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 96 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-038-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 97 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-039-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 98 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-040-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 99 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-041-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 100 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-042-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 101 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-043-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 102 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-044-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 103 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-045-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 104 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-046-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 105 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-047-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 106 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-048-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 107 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-049-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 108 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-050-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 109 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-051-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 110 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-052-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 111 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-053-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 112 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-054-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 113 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-055-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 114 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-056-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 115 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-057-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 116 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-058-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 117 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-059-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 118 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-060-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 119 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-061-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 120 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 Willdan Financial Services Page 8 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-080-062-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 121 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-063-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 122 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-064-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 123 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-065-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 124 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-066-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 125 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-067-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 126 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-068-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 127 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-069-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 128 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-070-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 129 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-071-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 130 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-072-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 131 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-073-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 132 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-074-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT I COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-075-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT J COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-076-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT K COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-077-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT L COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-080-078-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - POR LOT N COM AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-090-001-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 1 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-002-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 2 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-003-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 3 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-004-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 4 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-005-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 5 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-006-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 6 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-007-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 7 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-008-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 8 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-009-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 9 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-010-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 10 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-011-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 11 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-012-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 12 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-013-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 13 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-014-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 14 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-015-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 15 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-016-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 16 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-017-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 17 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-018-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 18 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-019-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 19 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-020-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 20 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-021-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 21 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-022-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 22 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-023-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 23 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 Willdan Financial Services Page 9 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
459-090-024-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 24 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-025-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 25 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-026-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 26 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-027-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 27 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-028-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 28 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-029-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 29 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-030-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 30 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-031-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 31 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-032-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 32 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-033-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 33 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-034-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 34 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-035-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 35 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-036-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 36 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-037-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 37 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-038-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 38 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-039-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 39 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-040-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 40 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-041-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 41 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-042-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 42 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-043-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 43 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-044-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 44 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-045-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 45 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-046-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 46 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-047-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 47 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-048-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 48 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-049-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 49 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-050-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 50 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-051-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 51 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-052-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 52 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-053-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 53 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-054-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 54 STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-055-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 87 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-090-056-000 SF A 232.04 535.78 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 88 STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-090-057-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT B COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-058-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT C COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-059-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT D COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-060-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT E COMMON AREA STONE POINT VIL 14 MOR DD-4 459-090-061-000 Common Area A - - 0.0 0.0 - POR LOT N COM AREA STONE POINT VIL 11 12 459-090-062-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT 10A PARK STONE POINT LARGE LOT SUBD MOR CC-94 459-090-063-000 Exempt A - - 0.0 0.0 - LOT 10B PARK STONE POINT LARGE LOT SUBD MOR CC-94 Willdan Financial Services Page 10 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-160-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 10 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-039-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-040-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 11 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-160-041-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-042-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-043-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-044-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-045-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-046-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-047-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-048-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-049-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-050-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-051-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-052-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-053-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-054-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-055-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-056-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-057-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-058-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-160-059-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 Willdan Financial Services Page 12 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-170-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-039-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-040-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-170-041-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 1 S-11 460-180-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 10 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A Willdan Financial Services Page 13 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-180-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-039-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-040-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-041-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-042-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-043-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-044-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-045-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-046-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-047-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-048-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-049-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-050-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-051-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-052-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-053-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-054-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-055-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-180-056-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2A 460-190-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 Willdan Financial Services Page 14 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-190-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-039-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-040-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-041-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-042-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-043-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-044-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 Willdan Financial Services Page 15 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
460-190-045-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 101 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-046-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 102 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-047-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 103 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-048-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 104 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-049-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 105 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-050-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 106 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-051-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 107 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-052-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 108 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-053-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 109 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-054-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 110 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-055-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 111 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-056-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 112 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-057-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 113 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 460-190-058-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 114 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS PHASE 2B S-54 461-011-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-011-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 Willdan Financial Services Page 16 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-012-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-039-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-040-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-041-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-042-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-043-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-044-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMEDNED) T-38 461-012-045-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-046-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-047-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-048-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-049-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-050-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-051-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-052-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-053-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-054-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-055-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-056-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-057-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-058-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-059-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-060-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-061-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-062-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-063-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-064-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 Willdan Financial Services Page 17 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-012-065-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-066-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-067-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-068-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-069-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-070-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-071-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-072-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-073-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-074-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-075-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-076-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-077-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-078-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-012-081-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOTS 10 & 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-012-082-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 POR LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS # 4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 1 (AMENDED) T-38 461-013-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 101 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 102 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 103 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 104 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 105 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 106 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 3 MOR T-39 461-013-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 107 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 Willdan Financial Services Page 18 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-013-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 108 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 109 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 110 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 111 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 112 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 113 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 114 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 115 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 116 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 117 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 118 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 119 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-013-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 120 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT 4 T-12 461-013-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 121 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS #4 PH 2 MOR T-39 461-021-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 64 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 65 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 66 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 67 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 68 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 69 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 70 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 71 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 72 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 73 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 74 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 75 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 76 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 77 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 78 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 79 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 80 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-021-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 81 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 82 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 83 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 84 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 85 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 86 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 87 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 88 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 89 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 19 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-022-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 90 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 91 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 92 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 93 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 94 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 95 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-022-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 96 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 97 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 98 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 99 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 100 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 101 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 102 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 103 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 104 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 105 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 106 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 107 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 108 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 109 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 110 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 111 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 112 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 113 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 114 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 115 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-023-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 116 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 117 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 118 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 119 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 120 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 121 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 122 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 123 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 124 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 125 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 126 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 127 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 128 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 129 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 20 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-024-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 130 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 131 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 132 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 133 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-024-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 134 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-001-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 1 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-002-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 2 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-003-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 3 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-004-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 4 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-005-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 5 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-006-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 6 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-007-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 7 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-008-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 8 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-009-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 9 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-010-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 10 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-011-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 11 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-012-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 12 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-013-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 13 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-014-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 14 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-015-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 15 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-016-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 16 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-017-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 17 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-018-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 18 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-019-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 19 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-020-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 20 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-021-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 21 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-022-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 22 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-023-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 23 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-024-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 24 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-025-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 25 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-026-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 26 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-027-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 27 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-028-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 28 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-029-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 29 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-030-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 30 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-031-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 31 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-032-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 32 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-033-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 33 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-034-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 34 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-035-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 35 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Willdan Financial Services Page 21 of 22

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY ZONE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
SF
UNITS

NON-RES

ACREAGE EBU LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Olympus Pointe Landscaping & Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
461-025-036-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 36 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-037-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 37 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-038-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 38 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-039-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 39 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-040-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 40 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-041-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 41 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-042-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 42 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-043-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 43 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-044-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 44 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-045-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 45 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-046-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 46 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-047-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 47 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-048-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 48 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-049-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 49 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-050-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 50 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-051-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 51 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-052-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 52 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-053-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 53 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-054-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 54 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-055-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 55 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-056-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 56 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-057-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 57 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-058-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 58 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-059-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 59 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-060-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 60 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-061-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 61 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-062-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 62 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 461-025-063-000 SF Residential D 150.18 180.18 1.0 0.0 1.00 LOT 63 OLYMPUS HEIGHTS UNIT #3 T-25 Summary Fields Zone A Zone D Total
ACTIVE PARCELS 400 468 868
LEVIED PARCELS 358 468 826
CHARGE $166,329.58 $70,284.24 $236,613.82
MAXIMUM ASMT $384,051.59 $84,323.16 $468,374.76
SF UNITS 186 468 654
NON-RES ACREAGE 530.8045 0.0000 530.8045
EBU 716.8045 468.0000 1,184.8045
Willdan Financial Services Page 22 of 22
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-124

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, , City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-125

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance, operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting, streetscape and hardscape areas, including monuments, landmark and gateway features, bulb-outs, walls, fencing, signage, special lighting, paving, transit facilities, ground cover, shrubs, plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, and other public improvements within the street rightof-way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District. The District is known and designated as:
“Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District”
Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by the City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 25-125
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2025.
,
Mayor
City of Roseville
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-126

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the district known and designated as the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and, WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and, WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE RIVERSIDE AVENUE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report, as presented, consists of the following:
a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’sReport. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 25-126
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2025.
,
Mayor
City of Roseville
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
City of Roseville

Riverside Avenue
Landscaping and Lighting District

FY 2025/26 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: April 16, 2025
Public Hearing: May 21, 2025

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

Riverside Avenue
Landscaping and Lighting District
City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California
This Report describes the District and any relevant zones therein, including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2025/26 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION ......................................... 1 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES.............................................. 2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT................................. 2 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE .......... 4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .....................................................................6 A. GENERAL............................................................................................................ 6 B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 6 C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY................................................................... 8 D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA................................................................ 9 III. DISTRICT BUDGET..........................................................................................11 A. FY 2025/26 BUDGET .................................................................................... 11 B. FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT RATES ............................................................. 12 C. FY 2025/26 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION .......................................... 12 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ........................................................... 12 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ....... 17 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................18 APPENDIX B — FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT ROLL ..............................................20 FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed in January of 2007 and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”).

The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District, any new annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. The special benefit assessments are based on historical and estimated costs to maintain the District improvements. These assessments, which provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District, will provide funding for the operation and maintenance of District improvements.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Placer County Assessor’s Office. The Placer County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Tax Code Accounts, to identify on the County’s tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will, by resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025/26. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
The City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with Section 22500 (the “1972 Act”); Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”); and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, beginning with Government Code Section 53750 (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”) initiated proceedings for the FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 formation of the District on November 15, 2006 and to levy and collect annual assessments against lots and parcels within the District for FY 2007/08. On January 17, 2007, pursuant to Assessment Law, the City conducted a Public Hearing and tabulated the returned ballots. The City determined that a majority protest did not exist and approved the District’s maximum assessment rate and annual inflationary adjustment factor.

Pursuant to the 1972 Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls. The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and Assessment Law.

C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The proposed territory within the District consists of all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land as shown on the Boundary Map titled “Boundary Map of Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District” contained within this report in Appendix A-1.

The District is bounded by Douglas Boulevard to the north, Darling Way to the south and includes parcels that front Riverside Avenue. It is centrally located between Interstate 80 and Downtown Roseville and is east of the Union Pacific Railroad.

The District currently has a mix of different types of land uses including automotive related retail and car lots, community/neighborhood retail, offices, services, and residential units.

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District, through the levy of special assessments, is to provide funding for ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements located within the public rights-of-ways and dedicated easements located within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, all materials, equipment, utilities, labor, and appurtenant facilities related to the ongoing maintenance of the improvements. The improvements to be maintained and services are generally described as follows:

Landscaping Improvements
The general landscaping improvements in the District are to be consistent with the improvements on Vernon Street located north of the District, which intersects Riverside Avenue. As a gateway to downtown Roseville, Riverside Avenue’s compatibility with Vernon Street links the downtown area and Riverside Gateway area together.

The landscaping improvements have been designed to enhance the area within the District and may include, but are not limited to ground cover, shrubs and plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting, masonry walls or other fencing, hardscape improvements, monuments and landmarks, mid-block bulbs, bulb-outs, and associated appurtenant located within the street rights-of-way and public areas within the District. Specifically, the proposed landscape improvement areas for this District are:
• Landscaping and hardscape improvements within the public rights-of-way of the streets within the District including, but not limited to, Riverside Avenue including the corners of Riverside Avenue and Second Street, Third Street, Fourth Street, Fifth Street, Sixth Street, Darling Way, Fern Street, Cherry Street, and Bonita Street.
• Decorative banners along Riverside Avenue.
• Transit facilities include bus stop seating and decorative shelters. • Roundabout improvements including plantings, paving, and landmark feature located at the intersection of Vernon St., Douglas Blvd., and Riverside Ave. • A Gateway feature located at the intersection of Darling Way and Riverside Avenue.
• Various amenities associated with the landscape improvements and public areas within the District, including, but not limited to, trash receptacles, street furniture, bike racks, entry signs, sidewalks, fencing, and retaining walls.

Specifically, not included as District improvements are those improvements located on private property, improvements and facilities that are outside the boundaries of the District and/or area funded by other sources available to the City.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 Public Lighting Improvements
The lighting improvements may include, but are not limited to, the cost of providing, maintaining, and servicing of lighting fixtures, poles, meters, conduits, electrical cable, and associated appurtenant facilities associated with:
• Lighting facilities within the landscaped areas and public areas including safety lights, security lights or ornamental lights installed as part of the District improvements; and
• Public street light improvements located on the streets within the District.

Specifically excluded from the assessment are the street light energy costs.

These costs are to be paid for by the City from other revenue sources.

Detailed maps and descriptions of the location and extent of the specific improvements to be maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Works and by reference are made part of this Report.

Description of Maintenance and Services
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping and street lighting improvements, or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping improvements including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, mowing, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the irrigation of the landscape improvements or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation of the landscaping improvements or appurtenant facilities. The street lighting improvements shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination; however, the City will be paying the actual energy costs of the streetlights.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The Implementation Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping improvements, streetlights, and traffic signals.

Streets and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than the assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
In addition, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act require that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost for the proportional special benefit conferred to that parcel. Article XIIID and the Implementation Act further provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. They also require that publicly owned properties that specifically benefit from the improvements be assessed.

B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service;”
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over, and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the District as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment revenues generated by District will be used solely for such purposes.

The costs of the proposed improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit. The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as an essential component and local amenity that provides a direct reflection and extension of the properties within the District which the property owners and residents have expressed a high level of support.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) set forth in the Report is based on the premise that each assessed property receives special benefits from the landscape and lighting improvements within the District, and the assessment obligation for each parcel reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefits as compared to other properties that receive special benefits.

To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report, have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identified as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit.”
Proper maintenance and operation of parkway landscaping and streetlights provides special benefit to adjacent properties by providing community character, security, safety, and vitality. In addition, these improvements will enhance the ability of property owners to attract and maintain customers as well as increase the viability of commercial development.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 Landscaping Special Benefit
Landscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade, and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. Specifically, they provide a sense of ownership and a common theme in the community providing aesthetic appeal and increased desirability of properties.

Landscaping provides special benefit to those developments that are directly adjacent to the public streets.

Landscaping General Benefit
The Improvements were installed to directly benefit the property owners in the District to enhance business and development opportunities. Therefore, it has been determined that there are no general benefits associated with the landscaping improvements.

Lighting Special Benefit
The operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting along local streets and arterial streets of a development provide the following special benefits:
• Improved security of lots and parcels along the perimeter of the development;
• Improved nighttime visibility for the local access of emergency vehicles; and • Improved safety and traffic circulation to and from parcels.

Street Lights General Benefit
Similar to the landscaping improvements described above, the Improvements were installed to directly benefit the property owners in the District to enhance business and development opportunities. Therefore, it has been determined that there are no general benefits associated with lighting improvements.

C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within the District, a formula that spreads the costs of the maintenance based on the special benefit must be established. The improvements have been reviewed and a formula has been established to apportion the maintenance costs based on benefit.

The method of assessment is based on the front footage of each parcel located within the District. The parcel’s Front Footage was determined based on Assessor Parcel maps or other sources. Only Front Footage on Riverside Avenue was used.

Based on the above formula, the FY 2007/08 maximum assessment rate approved on January 17, 2007 through a property owner balloting (the “Initial FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 Assessment Rate” or the “Base Year Maximum Assessment Rate”) is $6.45 per each foot of frontage.

The following formulas were used to first calculate the District’s Initial Assessment Rate and then each parcel’s FY 2007/08 assessment (proportional benefit):

Step 1:

Balance to Levy ÷ Total Front Footage =
Maximum Front Footage Rate
Step 2:

Parcel Front Footage x Maximum Front Footage Rate =
Maximum Assessment
The Total Front Footage was the sum of all the Front Feet within the District. The Initial Assessment Rate per Front Foot was established by taking the total cost of improvements (Balance to Levy) and dividing that amount by the Total Front Footage within the District. The Initial Assessment Rate per Front Foot, which is also the FY 2007/08 Maximum Front Footage Rate, is then applied back to each individual parcel’s Front Footage to determine the parcel’s proportionate special benefit and assessment obligation (The FY 2007/08 Maximum Assessment).

D. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
The purpose of establishing an Assessment Range Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessment rates without requiring the District to go through the requirements of Proposition 218 in order to get a small increase in assessments. This District provides for an annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate of the lesser of the percentage change in the area’s Local Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, which is currently the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (the “CPI”) or three percent (3%) (the “Escalation Percentage”).

The CPI in this adjustment shall be determined through CPI data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics from December to December, beginning with the period from December 2006 to December 2007.

In applying this year’s inflationary adjustment, the Escalation Percentage will increase the FY 2025/26 maximum assessment rate by 2.38% over that of the prior year.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 The Assessment Range Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District beginning in fiscal year 2008/09. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment rate for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment Rate, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The Maximum Assessment Rate is equal to the FY 2007/08 Maximum Assessment Rate, which was approved on January 17, 2007 through a property owner balloting (the “Initial Assessment Rate” or “Base Year Assessment Rate”) and adjusted annually by the Escalation Percentage.

Beginning in the second fiscal year (Fiscal Year 2008/09) and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment Rate would be recalculated, and a new Maximum Assessment Rate established within the District.

The Maximum Assessment Rate is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

Although the Maximum Assessment Rate will increase each year, the actual assessment rate may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment Rate adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The Maximum Assessment Rate calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase in the annual assessment rate and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate, then the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to balloting.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2025/26 BUDGET
Fund balance information is reported in Section C on the following page.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 B. FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT RATES
C. FY 2025/26 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET:

DIRECT COSTS
Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping improvements, irrigation, and related drainage systems, as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 Repair & Maintenance - Landscaping - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance – Lighting - This line item includes bulb replacement and repairs that are generally unforeseen. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Repair & Maintenance - Streetscape/Signage - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures - Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Contract Administration – Park’s Dept – Estimated Costs of Park and Recreation Department staff to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 cost of the Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.

County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out of pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

Contribution for /(Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 ASSESSMENT RATES:

Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government-owned land, public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Total Assessable Front Footage - The total amount of assessable Front Footage within the District in accordance with the Method of Assessment Section of this Report.

Applied Assessment Rate - The assessment rate to be applied to the front footage of each non-exempt parcel within the District for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Assessment Rate - The Maximum Assessment Rate per front foot for the current fiscal year.

Potential Maximum Assessment – The total amount that can be assessed against all non-exempt District parcels for the current fiscal year based upon the expected assessable front footage within the District.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

Replenish from FY 2025/26 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2025/26 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six-month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2025 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2025. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Use for FY 2025/26 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2025/26 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 July 1, 2025 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2025. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Collect from FY 2025/26 Levy — This amount is added to the levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

The Report provides a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A. The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are shown in the table below.

From time to time, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing needs due to the condition of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the District’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and/or operation of the improvements.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP
The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report. These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a summary of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19 FY 2025/26 Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, shall be submitted to the City Clerk, under separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-ways including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempt from assessment.

At the conclusion of the public hearing for the District and the proposed assessments, approval of the Report (as submitted or as modified) confirms the method of apportionment and the assessment rate to be levied against each eligible parcel and thereby constitutes the approved levy and collection of assessments for FY 2025/26. The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2025/26 property tax roll for each parcel.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the Current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
FRONT

FOOTAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
014-011-004-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 L 7 8 THEILE SUB 014-011-008-000 Assessable 1,658.32 1,658.34 165.0 LOTS 2 3 4 FR 1 THEILE SUB 014-011-009-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 5 6 THEILE SUBD 014-013-003-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR LOT 1 THEILE SUB 014-013-004-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR LOT 2 THEILE SUB 014-013-005-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 3 THEILE SUB 014-013-006-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 4 THEILE SUB 014-013-007-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 5 THEILE SUB 014-013-008-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 6 THEILE SUBD 014-013-009-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 7 THEILE SUBD 014-013-010-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR L 8 THEILE SUBD 014-024-003-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 1 THEILE SUB 014-024-004-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 2 THEILE SUB 014-024-005-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 3 THEILE SUBD 014-024-006-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 4 THEILE SUB 014-024-007-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 5 THEILE SUB 014-024-008-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 6 THEILE SUB 014-024-009-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 7 THEILE SUB 014-024-010-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 8 THEILE SUB 014-033-005-000 Assessable 572.86 572.88 57.0 FR LOT 2 THEILE 2 SUB 014-033-007-000 Assessable 1,145.74 1,145.76 114.0 POR LOT 4 THEILE #2 SUB MOR C-34 014-033-008-000 Assessable 1,145.74 1,145.76 114.0 FR LOT 5 THEILE 2 SUB 014-033-009-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 FR LOT 6 THEILE 2 SUB 014-033-014-000 Assessable 1,145.74 1,145.76 114.0 FR L 3 THEILE #2 SUBD 014-033-025-000 Assessable 572.86 572.88 57.0 PAR A PMOR 22 132 014-033-028-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR L 1 THEILE 2 SUBD 014-033-029-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR L 1 THEILE 2 SUBD 014-053-003-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 1 2 THEILE 3 SUB 014-053-004-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 3 THEILE 3 SUB 014-053-005-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 4 THEILE 3 SUB 014-053-006-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 5 THEILE 3 SUB 014-053-007-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 6 THEILE 3 SUB 014-053-008-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 7 THEILE #3 014-053-023-000 Assessable 1,452.90 1,452.90 144.56 L 8 THEILES SUBD 014-084-034-000 Assessable 1,141.92 1,141.94 113.62 FR SEC 11 10 6 014-091-014-000 Assessable 341.70 341.72 34.0 FR LOT 12 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-015-000 Assessable 331.66 331.67 33.0 FR LOTS 11 12 CHERRY GLEN 014-091-016-000 Assessable 331.66 331.67 33.0 FR LOT 11 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-017-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 L 10 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-018-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 9 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-019-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 7 8 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-020-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 6 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-021-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 5 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-022-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 4 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-023-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR LOTS 1 2 3 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-091-024-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 FR LOTS 1 2 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-141-012-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 12 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-013-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 11 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-014-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 10 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-015-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 9 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-016-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 8 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-017-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 7 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-019-000 Assessable 334.68 334.68 33.3 FR LOT 5 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-020-000 Assessable 334.68 334.68 33.3 FR LOTS 4 5 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-021-000 Assessable 334.68 334.68 33.3 FR LOT 4 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-022-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 3 CHERRY GL TR 014-141-023-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 1 2 CHERRY GL TR City of Roseville
Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 2

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
FRONT

FOOTAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
014-141-026-000 Assessable 251.26 251.26 25.0 FR LOT 6 BLK B CHERRY GLEN 014-141-027-000 Assessable 251.26 251.26 25.0 FR LOT 6 BLK B CHERRY GLEN 014-191-016-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 11 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-017-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 10 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-018-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 9 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-019-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 8 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-020-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 7 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-021-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 5 6 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-022-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 3 4 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-023-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 FR LOTS 1 2 CHERRY GL TR 014-191-025-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 12 CHERRY GL TR 014-251-011-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 L 6 7 CHERRY GL TR 014-251-012-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 L 4 5 CHERRY GL TR 014-251-013-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 3 CHERRY GL TR 014-251-014-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 LOT 2 CHERRY GL TR 014-251-015-000 Assessable 502.52 502.53 50.0 FR LOT 1 CHERRY GLEN TR 014-251-021-000 Assessable 1,005.04 1,005.05 100.0 LOTS 8 9 CHERRY GL TR 014-251-027-000 Assessable 1,507.56 1,507.58 150.0 1.2 AC SEC 11 10 6 472-180-009-000 Assessable 1,514.40 1,514.41 150.68 PARCEL A PARCEL MOR 1 11 Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 76
LEVIED PARCELS 76
CHARGE $50,048.54
MAXIMUM ASMT $50,049.17
FRONT FOOTAGE 4,979.76
Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 2
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-127

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-128

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS

FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) that provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting, hardscape and streetscape areas within the District including, gateways, signage, street trees, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking stripes, pavers, planters, turf, trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, and other public improvements within the street right-of-way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District. The District is known and designated as:
“Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District”
Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by the City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 25-128
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2025.
,
Mayor
City of Roseville
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 25-129

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the district known and designated as the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and, WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and, WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL FOR THE VERNON STREET LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report, as presented, consists of the following:
a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’sReport. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 25-129
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2025.
,
Mayor
City of Roseville
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
,
City Clerk
City of Roseville

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
City of Roseville

Vernon Street
Landscaping and Lighting District
FY 2025/26 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: April 16, 2025
Public Hearing: May 21, 2025

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:

Vernon Street
Landscaping and Lighting District
City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California
This Report describes the District and any relevant zones therein, including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2025/26 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION.................................1 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES...............................................2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT .................................2 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE...........4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .................................................................5 A. GENERAL ............................................................................................................5 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS..........................................................................................5 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................8 D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT.....................................................9 E. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATION..............................................................10 F. DETERMINATION OF FRONT FOOTAGE ..................................................10 III. DISTRICT BUDGET......................................................................................11 A. FY 2025/26 BUDGET ......................................................................................11 B. FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT RATES .............................................................12 C. FY 2025/26 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ...........................................12 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ..........................................................12 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........17 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP .......................................................18 APPENDIX B — FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT ROLL ..............................................20 FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed in January of 2001 and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”).

Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025/26. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION
All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218).

The District has been formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Pursuant FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 to the Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls.

The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the Act.

Prior to FY 2001/02, the City initiated (Resolution 00-523) and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings (Resolution 01-22) in accordance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution (“Article XIIID”) for the parcels within the District.

An annual rate escalator was also included in the ballot that allows for an annual inflationary increase equal to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area (the “CPI”) of each succeeding year (the “Escalation Percentage”). At the conclusion of the Public Hearing held on January 17, 2001, all property owner ballots returned were tabulated to determine if majority protest existed. The result of the protest proceeding was an approval of the assessment rate and the annual inflationary increase for maintaining the improvements within the District.

Pursuant to the Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls.

C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The District is located in downtown Roseville and includes all parcels that front along Vernon Street between Folsom Road and the Riverside/Douglas Boulevard.

See Appendix A for District boundary map.

D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District ensures the continued maintenance, servicing, administration and operation of various landscape, lighting and streetscape improvements and associated appurtenances that are required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. The assessable parcels receive benefit from the above improvements within the District.

Specific improvements include installation, maintenance and servicing of public facilities, including, but not limited to street trees, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking stripes, turf, brick pavers, planters, gateways, benches, bike racks, signage, trash receptacles, and lighting throughout the boundaries of the District (the “Improvements’).

As applied herein, “installation” means the construction of public Improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting, and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage, lights, equipment, turf, brick pavers, planters, gateways, benches, bike racks and signage.
“Maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any Improvement, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste, and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of Improvements to remove or cover graffiti. “Servicing” means the furnishing of electric current, or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other Improvements; or water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other Improvements.

Plans and specification for the Improvements to be maintained are on file in the office of the Economic and Community Services Director at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678.

All assessable parcels identified as being within the District share in both the cost and the benefits of the improvements. The costs associated with the Improvements are equitably spread among all benefiting parcels within the District.

Only parcels that receive direct benefit from the Improvements are assessed, and each parcel is assessed in proportion to the estimated benefit received. The funds collected are dispersed and used for only the services and operation provided to the District.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the Improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel.

B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over, and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report, have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identified as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit”. The City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID. Each of the proposed Improvements, the associated costs and assessments were identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID and 1972 Act. Additionally, the Improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the Improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.

The City annually levies and collects special benefit assessments in order to maintain and service the District Improvements. The District provides for specific Improvements and services that include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and lighting Improvements and associated appurtenances located within the District’s public rights-of-way and dedicated easements. The annual assessment is based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the Improvements that provide a benefit to properties within these Districts. The FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 Improvements within the District and the costs of those Improvements are identified and budgeted separately, including all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves.

All Improvements within the District and the properties associated with those Improvements were reviewed for benefit prior to the formation of the District.

Because the Improvements affront the benefited parcels, it has been determined that there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large. In making this determination it should be noted that similar improvements within California are typically maintained by individual property owners, through some type of association or a special district as allowed by State Law since the on-going maintenance of these improvements are a special benefit to the properties associated with those improvements.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) for the District is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives special benefit from the Improvements maintained and financed by District assessments.

The presence of these Improvements and the close proximity of the Improvements to the properties within the District enhance the desirability and security of properties within the District.

The landscape Improvements provided by the District may include landscaped parkways, perimeters, entryways, local medians, slopes, internal amenities, and appurtenant facilities. Street lighting Improvements may include all energy costs and necessary maintenance to the facilities related thereto. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated costs to provide all necessary service, operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep these Improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping Improvements are specifically:

The special benefits associated with all landscaping Improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the Improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained Improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained landscaped areas.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 • Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods. Specifically:
• Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on streets and roads within the Districts. • Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved ingress and egress to property.
• Reduced vandalism and other criminal acts and damage to Improvements or property.
• Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed, among all assessable parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the Improvements. The special benefit formula used should reflect the composition of the parcels, the Improvements and services provided to fairly proportion the costs based on estimated special benefit to each parcel within the District. All assessable parcels within the District shall receive a direct special benefit from the services and Improvements provided by the District.

Article XIIID of the California Constitution specifies that only special benefits are assessable, and that the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on any parcel. Since the District is a downtown business area and the Improvements that affront each District parcel primarily attract and retain an increased customer base, these benefits enhance the District parcels and there is no measurable benefit to the public at large. Therefore, 100% of the Improvements are considered special benefit to the District parcels. The cost of FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 maintaining the Improvements is therefore identified as special benefit and has been allocated to the special assessments.

It was determined that a uniform assessment rate per foot of frontage upon Vernon Street would fairly distribute the net amount to be assessed due to the following reasons:

1. The assessments are based upon a specific property owner’s special benefit received from the Improvements.

2. The special benefits should be directly related to the extent at which a property fronts the improvements, relative to other properties in the District.

The base assessment rate for the District was $4.59 per linear foot in FY 2001/02 and was determined using the formula below.

Balance to Levy
Assessment Rate Per Foot =
Total Feet of Frontage
The annual assessment amount for each parcel was then determined using the formula below:

Parcel Front Footage x Rate per Linear Foot = Parcel Assessment Amount D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT
Commencing with FY 2002/03, the maximum assessment rate is to increase annually by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward (“CPI”) as of January of each succeeding year (the “Escalation Percentage”). Since the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics does not publish a CPI for January; the CPI for preceding month shall be used since this is the CPI available in the month of January. The District’s starting CPI Index of 184.1, December of 2000, is hereby established as the base CPI (the “Base Year CPI Index”).

In applying this year’s CPI increase, the Escalation Percentage will increase the FY 2025/26 maximum assessment rate by 2.38% over that of the prior year.

If the proposed assessment increases over the prior fiscal year by a percentage no greater than the Escalation Percentage as defined above, then the proposed assessment is not considered an increase. This assessment range formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment rate for the Current Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated maximum assessment rate, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 E. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATION
Any property owner, who believes that the assessment levied on the subject property is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of assessment, may file a written appeal with the Finance Director of the City of Roseville or his or her designee. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then current Fiscal Year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee will promptly review the appeal and any information provided by the property owner. If the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee finds that the assessment should be modified, the appropriate changes shall be made to the assessment roll. However, if any such changes are approved after the County of Placer’s deadline for adjustments to the tax roll, the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee is authorized to approve a refund of the reduction amount to the property owner. Any dispute over the decision of the Director of Housing and Redevelopment or his or her designee, shall be referred to the City Council of the City of Roseville and the decision of the City Council of the City of Roseville shall be final.

F. DETERMINATION OF FRONT FOOTAGE
The front footage of each assessable parcel is subject to revision and/or correction using measurements of front footage found on the then current Placer County Assessor’s Parcel Maps or through direct measurement by City personnel. Any such correction that increases a Parcel Assessment shall not be considered an increased assessment subject to the procedural provisions of Article XIIID.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2025/26 BUDGET
Fund balance information is reported in Section C on the following page.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 B. FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT RATES
C. FY 2025/26 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:

BUDGET

DIRECT COSTS
Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping corridors, street medians, entryways, irrigation, and related drainage systems as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 Repair & Maintenance – Landscaping - This line item includes repairs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

Repair & Maintenance – Lighting - This line item includes bulb replacement and repairs that are generally unforeseen. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc.

Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.

Rehab Reserve Expenditures – Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out-of-pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.

ASSESSMENT RATES:

Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government-owned land, FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.

Total Assessable Front Footage - The total linear footage of that portion of each assessable parcel’s boundary that is contiguous with Vernon Street.

Applied Assessment Rate per Front Foot - This amount represents the rate being applied to the front footage of each parcel for the Current Fiscal Year.

Maximum Assessment Rate per Front Foot - This amount represents the maximum rate that can be applied to the front footage of each parcel for the Current Fiscal Year.

Maximum Potential Assessment – The total amount that is expected to be assessed against all parcels within the District for the Current Fiscal Year.

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:

Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 Ending Rehab Reserve Balance 6-30-2026 (est.) - The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of June 30, 2026. These funds shall be used to provide for future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. Should the District have no Rehabilitation Reserve balances or related activity, no Rehabilitation Reserve information shall be presented in the Report.

From time to time, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing needs due to the condition of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the Districts’ Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department or equivalent, in order to provide for the maintenance and/or operation of the improvements.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP
The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the 1972 Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report. These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.

For general reference purposes, a summary of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.

FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19 FY 2025/26 Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX B — FY 2025/26 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-ways including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
FRONT

FOOTAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
013-070-004-000 Assessable 2,044.00 2,044.02 235.61 FR SEC 2 10 6 013-071-001-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 8 BLK 1 RSVL RESVY C-33 SBE#294-31-15 PAR 1 013-071-002-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 7 BLK 1 RSVL RESVY C-33 SBE#294-31-16 PAR 1 013-071-003-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 6 BLK 1 RSVL RESVY C-33 SBE#294-31-16 PAR 1 013-071-004-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 LOT 4,5 BLK 1 RSVL RESVY C-33 SBE#294-31-12 PAR 1 013-071-006-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 FR LOTS 1 2 BLK 1 013-071-009-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 3 POR 2 BLK 1 RSVL RSVY C-33 SBE#294-31-12 PAR 1 013-072-008-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 POR LOTS 15 & 16 BLK 15 ROSEVILLE TOWNSITE 013-072-010-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 LOTS 13 14 BLK 15 013-072-011-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 12 BLK 15 013-072-012-000 Assessable 1,301.30 1,301.31 150.0 L 9 10 11 BLK 15 013-073-011-000 Assessable 1,127.80 1,127.81 130.0 LOTS 1 2 BUTLER SUBD 013-091-003-000 Assessable 1,301.30 1,301.31 150.0 L 1 2 3 BL 3 013-091-010-000 Assessable 1,891.24 1,891.24 218.0 LOTS 4, 5 , 6&7&POR 8 & CITY ST BLK3 TOWN OF RSVL 013-092-005-510 Assessable 216.88 216.89 25.0 FR L 5 BLK 2 013-092-005-520 Assessable 216.88 216.89 25.0 FR L 5 BLK 2 013-092-006-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 FR LOT 4 BLK 2 013-092-007-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 3 BLK 2 013-092-008-000 Assessable 349.18 349.19 40.25 FR LOT 2 BLK 2 013-092-009-000 Assessable 520.26 520.27 59.97 FR LOTS 1 2 BLK 2 013-092-014-000 Assessable 1,301.30 1,301.31 150.0 FR SEC 2 10 6 013-093-003-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 FR LOTS 14 LOTS 15 16 BLK 14 013-093-004-000 Assessable 251.58 251.59 29.0 FR LOT 14 BLK 14 013-093-005-000 Assessable 182.18 182.18 21.0 FR L 14 BLK 14 RSVLLE 013-093-006-000 Assessable 659.32 659.33 76.0 FR LOT 12 LOT 13 BLK 14 013-093-007-000 Assessable 1,509.52 1,509.53 174.0 LOTS 9 10 11 FR LOT 12 BLK 14 013-121-002-000 Assessable 1,301.30 1,301.31 150.0 L 4 5 6 BLK 5 013-121-003-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 3 BLK 5 013-121-004-000 Assessable 868.58 868.58 100.12 PAR A PMOR 18 117 013-121-005-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 L 7 BLK 5 RSVLE 013-121-006-000 Assessable 434.28 434.29 50.06 L 8 BLK 5 RSVLLE 013-122-001-000 Assessable 435.06 435.07 50.15 FR L 7 8 BLK 4 013-122-002-000 Assessable 203.86 203.87 23.5 FR LOT 7 BLK 4 013-122-003-000 Assessable 228.58 228.60 26.35 FR L 7 BLK 4 013-122-004-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 L 6 BLK 4 013-122-005-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 5 BLK 4 013-122-009-000 Assessable 782.42 782.44 90.19 L 1 FR L 2 BLK 4 013-122-010-000 Assessable 520.52 520.53 60.0 L 3 FR 2 BLK 4 RSVLLE 013-122-011-000 Assessable 173.50 173.51 20.0 FR L 4 BLK 4 RSVLLE 013-122-012-000 Assessable 260.26 260.26 30.0 FR L 4 BLK 4 RSVL 013-123-017-000 Assessable 955.68 955.69 110.16 PAR 1 PMOR 18 155 013-123-021-000 Assessable 631.12 631.14 72.75 PAR 1 PMOR 32-99 013-123-024-000 Assessable 1,263.92 1,263.92 145.69 1.1 AC PAR 3 PMOR 32-99 013-123-026-000 Assessable 618.20 618.21 71.26 PAR 2 PMOR 32-99 013-124-006-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 16 BLK 13 013-124-007-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 L 15 BLK 13 013-124-008-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 LOT 14 BLK 13 013-124-017-000 Assessable 1,301.30 1,301.31 150.0 LOTS 11 12 13 BLK 13 & POR ALLEY WAY 013-124-018-000 Assessable 674.08 674.08 77.7 LOT 10 BLK 13 & POR CITY STREET & ALLEY WAY 013-151-004-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 POR L 7 & 8 BLK 6 013-152-012-000 Assessable 433.76 433.77 50.0 L 11 BLK 10 013-152-017-000 Assessable 867.54 867.54 100.0 PAR A PMOR 21 141 013-152-021-000 Assessable 2,168.84 2,168.86 250.0 LOTS 12-16 BLK 10 ROSEVILLE ORIGINAL TOWN 013-153-013-000 Assessable 1,257.92 1,257.94 145.0 FR L 10 L 11 12 BLK 11 013-153-014-000 Assessable 511.84 511.85 59.0 LOT 9 FR 10 BLK 11 013-153-019-000 Assessable 648.82 648.84 74.79 LOT 13 FR LOT 14 BLK 11 013-153-023-000 Assessable 1,086.24 1,086.25 125.21 PAR A & B PMOR 1 1 City of Roseville
Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 2

ASSESSOR

PARCEL NUMBER
ASMT

CATEGORY CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
FRONT

FOOTAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Preliminary Assessment Roll
013-161-001-000 Assessable 563.90 563.90 65.0 FR L 9 10 BLK 8 013-161-002-000 Assessable 780.78 780.79 90.0 FR LOT 10 11 BLK 8 013-162-001-000 Assessable 3,470.16 3,470.17 400.0 BLK 9 ROSEVILLE 013-250-032-000 Not Balloted - - 0.0 FR SEC 2 10 6
013-250-033-000 Not Balloted - - 0.0 53.6 AC FR SEC 2 10 6 SBE # 872-31-2Y PAR 57 013-250-034-000 Not Balloted - - 0.0 FR SEC 2 10 6 SBE # 872-31-2Y PAR 58 MRO Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 63
LEVIED PARCELS 60
CHARGE $46,593.08
MAXIMUM ASMT $46,593.66
FRONT FOOTAGE 5,370.76
Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 2

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3840
File #: 0210
Title:

Sales Tax Revenue Consulting Services - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
Contact: N. Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected] Meeting Date: 4/16/2025
Item #: 7.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a fourth amendment to a professional services agreement with MuniServices, LLC to provide sales tax and transactions and use tax auditing, projection, recovery, and consultant services.

BACKGROUND
On April 7, 2021, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with MuniServices, LLC, to provide sales tax and transactions and use tax auditing, projection, recovery, and consultant services. The agreement terms included an initial two-year term and an annual not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 per year, or $300,000 over the total agreement term. MuniServices, LLC's compensation is based on a portion of quarterly revenues received by the City due to their audit and recovery services.

On June 15, 2022, the City Council authorized the City Manager to amend this agreement to increase the not-to-exceed amount to $250,000 per year because MuniServices identified a higher than anticipated amount of misallocated sales tax and transaction and use tax from their audit and recover services.

The initial two-year term of the agreement expired on April 7, 2023. The City Council authorized staff to exercise an agreement option to extend the agreement for an additional one-year period commencing on April 8, 2023, and ending on April 7, 2024. The next year, the second additional one-year extension was approved.

Staff now recommends exercising the option to extend the agreement for a final additional oneyear period through April 16, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
This agreement is structured to only compensate MuniServices, LLC based on the amount of additional revenues received by the City due to their audit and recovery services. The additional one-year extension will increase the total not-to-exceed amount from $1 million to $1.25 million.

The additional sales and use tax revenues that the City receives for the General Fund from these services more than offsets the cost.

Adequate appropriations are available in the FY2024-25 approved budget to fund this amendment. Staff will incorporate the cost of this agreement into the proposed FY2025-26 budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061 {b )(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Respectfully Submitted,
Nancy Rothlisberger, Budget Manager
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-096
MuniServices (Sales Tax Consulting) - FourthAmendment to PSA RESOLUTION NO. 25-096

APPROVING A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND MUNISERVICES, LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Fourth Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for tax revenue consulting services, by and between the City of Roseville and MuniServices, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Fourth amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
[B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Sales Tax Consulting.docx:03/03/2025] A25-00256 KA

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Tax Revenue Consulting Services
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and MuniServices, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(“CONSULTANT”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT previously entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated April 7, 2021 and amended on June 15, 2022, April 5, 2023, and April 3, 2024 (“Agreement”) regarding tax revenue consulting services (“Project”); and WHEREAS, CITY is exercising its option to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one (1) year period; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing and able to provide such additional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY is exercising its option to extend the term of this Agreement for an additional (1) year commencing on April 8, 2025 and ending on April 7, 2026.” [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Sales Tax Consulting.docx:03/03/2025] A25-00256 KA

2. Section 3 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY shall pay two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), in consideration of the additional services to the Fourth Amendment to Agreement. This brings the total not to exceed contract amount to one million two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,250,000).”

3. The Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph regarding compliance with the Levine Act:
“24. The Levine Act Disclosure. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to CITY elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the CITY decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by CONSULTANT and/or its agent(s), CONSULTANT is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.”

4. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Fourth Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Sales Tax Consulting.docx:03/03/2025] A25-00256 KA Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Fourth Amendment to Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a MUNISERVICES, LLC, a Delaware
municipal corporation limited liability company
BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

SCOTT PETTINGELL
Finance Director
ceo CFO

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3834
File #: 0200
Title: Municipal Advisor Services - Professional Services Agreements Contact: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] Meeting Date: 4/16/2025
Item #: 7.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt two resolutions authorizing the City Manager to execute professional services agreements with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. and PFM Financial Advisors LLC for Municipal Advisor Services.

BACKGROUND
As needed, the City requires municipal advisor services related to issuing bonds, which are highly technical and demand specialized expertise. Each bond transaction can be complex and requires a unique skill set to help the City mitigate risk, make informed decisions, and achieve the lowest overall cost of capital. As a full-service city, there is a need for a wide range of municipal advisory services across various financial functions that the City manages daily. Historically, the City has retained a single Municipal Advisor; however, it sought to broaden its perspective, particularly for situations involving utilities and special tax bonds related to Community Facilities Districts. In December 2024, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Municipal Advisor Services and received several responses. After reviewing the proposals and interviewing the top-ranked firms, City staff recommends contracting with PFM Financial Advisors, LLC (PFM) and Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. (Fieldman) to meet the City's diverse financial needs.

PFM has been a national leader in providing independent financial advice to local, state, and regional government clients for over 48 years. PFM serves over half of the 50 largest municipal utilities in the country and has extensive experience with Community Facilities Districts, General Fund, utility, electric, water, and sewer transactions.

Fieldman brings nearly six decades of experience and has worked with over 140 cities.

Additionally, Fieldman has served as the City's consultant for continuing disclosure related to nonland secured debt compliance for over a decade, providing them with an in-depth understanding of the City's debt.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended professional services agreement with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. has a not-to-exceed amount of $500,000 through June 30, 2028. This fee covers financial advisory services related to bond issuances and is structured based on the amount and type of bonds issued. These expenses are categorized as bond issuance costs, with the total amount dependent on the number of bond issuances each year.

The recommended professional services agreement with PFM has a not-to-exceed amount of $350,000 through June 30, 2028, and consists of two components:

1. Annual Retainer – A $25,000 annual fee for general financial advisory services, split between the General Fund ($10,000) and Electric Fund ($15,000). An adequate budget is available to cover the General Fund and Electric portion for the remainder of FY2024-25.

2. Bond Issuance Costs – Fees for financial advisory services related to bond issuances, with total costs dependent on the number of bond issuances each year.

Bond issuance costs are typically contingent upon bond issuance and are paid from bond proceeds. A large portion of the work the Municipal Advisors provide will be related to public improvements within a Community Facilities District and, therefore, funded by property owners within the CFD. Any additional municipal advisory services will be budgeted based on the specific type of work provided.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-091
Signed Fieldman contract
Resolution 25-092
Signed PFM contract
RESOLUTION NO. 25-091

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for municipal advisor services, by and between the City of Roseville and Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025]

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Municipal Advisor Services
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc., a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY desires professional services consisting of municipal advisor services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a proposal dated January 16, 2025, which describes the scope of work to be performed by CONSULTANT, the budget for the work, and the schedule for performance of the work; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide such professional services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution and expire on June 30, 2028. The City Manager may, in his or her discretion, elect to extend the Agreement in one (1) year increments for up to an additional two (2) years by giving CONSULTANT thirty (30) days advance written notice of each optional one (1) year renewal. Such extensions shall be memorialized by a written amendment to this Agreement.

2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 2 3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the budget estimate and rates (rates subject to annual inflationary increases on the annual anniversary of contract execution date) as described in EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).

CONSULTANT shall submit one monthly invoice for its services. Such invoices shall be delineated by task, the person performing the services, and the hourly rate, which shall be stated in time increments of not greater than one tenth (1/10) hours. CITY shall pay invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY. [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 3 CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 4 primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 5 regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

6. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 6 this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

7. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

8. Reserved.

9. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

10. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

11. Public Contracts: Conflicts of Interest. CONSULTANT’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of the CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 7 on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

13. The Levine Act Disclosure. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to CITY elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the CITY decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by CONSULTANT and/or its agent(s), CONSULTANT is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

15. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 8 will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s oncall needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

16. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 9 Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

18. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

19. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days [\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 10 advance written notice. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any Material, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

22. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Jeannine Thrash Anna Sarabian
City of Roseville Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc.
311 Vernon Street 19900 MacArthur Blvd. #1100
Roseville, CA 95678 Irvine, CA 92612
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 11 Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES,
municipal corporation INC., a California corporation
BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
Anna Sarabian, Vice Chairperson/Sr. Vice President
James Fabian, Sr. Vice President/Secretary
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\My_Documents\CITYATTORNEY\ayekelly\My Documents\Municipal Advisor Services Fieldman Rolapp and Associates.docx;03/19/2025] 12 APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

SCOTT PETTINGELL
Finance Director
RFP for Municipal Advisor

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
January 16, 2025
PAGE | 13
Integrity: Fieldman stands out for its commitment to transparency and principled advice. We don’t just say yes; we say what’s best. That means delivering honest, conservative recommendations, even advising when it may be wise to hold off on a project. Clear communication and transparency are at the core of our advisory process, ensuring that the City’s interests are always our top priority.

Service: We pride ourselves on the hands-on, proactive approach we bring to our clients, becoming an extension of staff, working together every step of the way. Our 80/20 approach to transaction management anticipates challenges and ensures that unforeseen events do not disrupt the bond issuance process. This proactive approach allows us to deliver creative solutions and excellent service throughout every project.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN

PLAN OF FINANCE
Our approach is designed to comprehensively address the City’s Scope of Services, providing proactive and innovative solutions to meet its financial planning, debt management, and financial implementation needs. Each component of our methodology reflects our commitment to excellence, deep industry expertise, and a collaborative partnership with City staff.

RFP for Municipal Advisor

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
January 16, 2025
PAGE | 14
RFP for Municipal Advisor

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
January 16, 2025
PAGE | 15
RFP for Municipal Advisor

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
January 16, 2025
PAGE | 16

PROPOSED WORK SCHEDULE
A typical financing timeline spans approximately four months from the initial kick-off conference call to the bond closing date.

We reviewed the City’s recent CFD bond sales and observed that many have indicated that future parity bonds are expected to be issued only to fund deferred impact fees and the remaining authorization will be available to be utilized by the City thereafter. However, we noted the Creekview CFD phase 5 development, planned for an additional 285 single-family residential units, will be annexed into the CFD as a separate Improvement Area, with bonds issued subsequently.

As there are possible refunding opportunities expected in the near term, we believe the next likely financing will be either a new money CFD issuance or refunding. To assist with planning, we have attached sample new money and refunding CFD schedules for your reference as Appendix F.

STAFF AND EQUIPMENT
All work is done in-house, not by any sub-consultants or sub-contractors. Mr. Porr and Mrs. Nichols will advise solely on any utility financings and Dr. Sarabian, Ms. Redmon and Mr. Jasper will be the core team on all financings. No additional equipment, training or installation services are required.

TAB: F: COST PROPOSAL
Our goal is always to provide value in the services that we provide to our clients, far in excess of our fees. Our fee is premised on the concept that assignments, per the RFP, could involve:

1. Fixed fees and expenses for transaction services

2. Hourly fees for as-needed services

3. Continuing disclosure services
Months 1 to 4: Develop Legal and Financing Documents; and Plan of Finance Kick-Off Finance Team Call
All-Hands Team Check-in Calls
Draft and Review Resolutions
Draft and Review Preliminary
Official Statement
Review/Finalize Plan of Finance
and Cashflows
Monitor Market Conditions
Months 2 to 3: Develop Credit Rating Strategy; and
Approve Financing
Draft Credit Rating Presentation
Virtual Meeting with Rating
Agency
Receive Rating
Prepare Staff Memo and
Presentation for City Council
Meeting to Approve Financing
City Council Approves Financing
Month 4: Bond Sale
Sell Bonds
Finalize All Documents including
the Final Official Statement, and
all related Legal Documents
Close Financing/Deliver Bond
Proceeds to City
RFP for Municipal Advisor

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
January 16, 2025
PAGE | 17
Fee for Transaction Services
Based on the Scope of Services outlined in the RFP, we propose the following tentative fees, subject to negotiation with the City.

For transactions that include multiple series of bonds, the full transaction fee will not be charged for each additional series of bonds. For any series in excess of one a fee of not to exceed $20,000 per each additional series will be added to the transaction fee above. For any pooled refundings with multiple underlying CFDs or improvement areas, we will negotiate an additional fee to be added to the base transaction fee that will depend on the number of underlying districts and the complexity of the transaction. Typically, the all-in pooled refunding transaction fees range between $65,000 and $125,000.

Payment of fees pursuant to debt issuance shall be contingent on, and payable, at the closing of the debt issue(s) undertaken to finance the City’s financings. The fees listed above shall increase each January 1st beginning January 1, 2026 by three percent (3.00%).

Expenses will be billed for separately and will cover, among other things, travel, lodging, conference calls, internet posting, subsistence, overnight courier, computer, and fax transmission charges.

Advances made on behalf of the City for costs of preparing, printing or distributing disclosure materials or related matter whether by postal services or electronic means, may also be billed to the City upon prior authorization. Additionally, a surcharge of six percent (6.00%) of the compensation amount is added to verifiable out-of-pocket costs for recovery of costs such as telephone, postage, document reproduction and the like.

Fee for As-Needed Financial Advisory Services
CFD formation services and other ad-hoc financial advisory services performed will be billed at the then current hourly rates. The table below reflects the rates in effect as of the date of this RFP submission. If needed, we will be happy to negotiate a not-to-exceed amount for each project, depending on the specific scope of work at the time. Typically, CFD formation services are in the range of $35,000-$40,000, sometimes less if the formation is straightforward and completed expeditiously.

DEBT TRANSACTION SIZE CFD BONDS NON-CFD
BONDS
(EXCLUDING

UTILITY

FINANCINGS)

UTILITY

FINANCINGS
up to $10,000,000 $40,000 $48,000 $48,000
$10,000,001 to $25,000,000 $52,000 $60,000 $60,000
$25,000,001 to $50,000,000 $60,000 $68,000 $75,000
$50,000,001 to $100,000,000 $65,000 $75,000 $90,000
$100,000,001 to $200,000,000 $80,000 $90,000 $125,000
Greater than $200,000,000 To be negotiated
RFP for Municipal Advisor

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
January 16, 2025
PAGE | 18

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Effective January 1, 2025
Executive Officer $427
Principal $417
Executive/Senior Vice President $406
Vice President $346
Assistant Vice President $319
Senior Associate $287
Associate $254
Analyst $141
Administrative Assistant $103
Hourly compensation will be billed on a monthly basis and will be due thirty (30) days from invoice date. Invoices not paid within sixty (60) days are subject to a two percent (2.00%) late fee for every month payment is late. The hourly rates listed above shall increase each January 1st beginning January 1, 2026 by three percent (3.00%).

Fee for Continuing Disclosure Consulting Services
For services on Annual Reporting and CDIAC Annual Reporting, the Consultant will be compensated $6,500 for Federal and State Filings per year. Such amount shall increase by the Annual Inflation Adjustment.

For services on Reporting of Significant Event Notices (Rating Changes) and Termination of Reporting Obligation, the Consultant will be compensated at $500 per notice.

For services on Continuing Disclosure Compliance Review, the Consultant will be compensated at $5,000 per year.

For Additional Services, the Consultant will be compensated at hourly rates.

TAB G: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS
Non-substitution for the designated members of the team without approval by City staff(Section 4.0) We commit to the City that the designated project team will be used for this project if Fieldman is selected. Departure or reassignment of, or substitution for, any member of the designated project team shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City.

The absence of a conflict of interest (Section 9.4)
We confirm that there is not any actual, apparent, direct, indirect, or potential conflicts of interest that may exist with respect to the Firm relative to the services to be provided to the City.

Indicate your ability and agreement to fulfill the indemnification and insurance requirements contained in the sample contract (Section 9.7).

If selected, the Firm will fulfill the indemnification and insurance requirements contained in the sample contract within the time frame required.

RESOLUTION NO. 25-092

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PFM FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for municipal advisor services, by and between the City of Roseville and PFM Financial Advisors LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
[B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025]

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Municipal Advisor Services
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and PFM Financial Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025]

3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the budget estimate and rates (rates set forth in this Agreement are guaranteed by Consultant for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of execution of this Agreement and to be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index for Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA (CPI) once the CPI information is available in the month subsequent to the anniversary date of the Agreement), as described in EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Total compensation shall not exceed three hundred fifty thousand dollars ($350,000), which includes a fixed fee annual retainer in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per year, plus additional costs per services as described in EXHIBIT “B”.

4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole 3 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a 4 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. 5 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, and agents.
6 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

6. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

7. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

8. Reserved.

9. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

10. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement. 7 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025]

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

13. The Levine Act Disclosure. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to CITY elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the CITY decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by CONSULTANT and/or its agent(s), CONSULTANT is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as 8 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] further described at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

15. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on- 9 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

16. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

18. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such 10 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

19. Termination of Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any Material, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Jeannine Thrash Michael Berwanger
City of Roseville PFM Financial Advisors LLC
311 Vernon Street 222 N. Pacific Coast Hwy, 10th Floor
Roseville, CA 95678 El Segundo, CA 90245
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

25. Registered Municipal Advisor; Required Disclosures. CONSULTANT is a registered municipal advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 15Ba1-2. The parties agree that if CITY has designated CONSULTANT as its independent registered municipal advisor (“IRMA”) for purposes of SEC Rule 15Ba1-1(d)(3)(vi) (the “IRMA exemption”), the services provided pursuant to such designation shall be the services described in Exhibit A hereto, subject to any agreed upon limitations. Verification of independence (as is required under the IRMA exemption) shall be the responsibility of such third party seeking to rely on such IRMA exemption.

CONSULTANT shall have the right to review and approve in advance any representation of 12 [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] CONSULTANT’s role as IRMA to CITY.

MSRB Rules require that municipal advisors make written disclosures to their clients of all material conflicts of interest, certain legal or disciplinary events and certain regulatory requirements, which are provided in CONSULTANT’s Disclosure Statement delivered to CITY prior to or together with this Agreement.

26. Additional Services. Upon request of CITY, an affiliate of CONSULTANT or a third party referred or otherwise introduced by CONSULTANT and/or designated by CITY may agree to additional services to be provided by such affiliate or third party under a separate writing, including separate scope and compensation, between CITY and such affiliate or third party. For the sake of clarity, any separate agreement between CITY and an affiliate of CONSULTANT or third party shall not in any way be deemed an amendment or modification of this Agreement.

27. Information to be Furnished to CONSULTANT. All information, data, reports, and records in the possession of CITY or any third party necessary for carrying out any services to be performed under this Agreement (“Data”) shall be furnished to CONSULTANT.

CONSULTANT may rely on the Data in connection with its provision of the services under this Agreement and the provider thereof shall remain solely responsible for the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of such Data.
[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. , adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the day of , 20 , and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a PFM FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC, a
municipal corporation Delaware limited liability company BY: BY:

DOMINICK CASEY its:

City Manager
ATTEST:
and
BY:
its:

BY:

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY:

SCOTT PETTINGELL
Finance Director
1 Michael Berwanger, Managing Director
[B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] EXHIBIT “A”
City of Roseville - Request for Proposals RFP #10-031 Municipal Advisor 30 E. Project Plan
DEBT ISSUANCE SERVICES: TIMELINE AND IMPLEMENTATION
When working on a transaction, PFM takes responsibility for coordinating between members of the financing team and scheduling the events necessary to keep the project on track. By identifying and ensuring the project meets key dates and closing processes, as well as preparing for common and potential issues which must be overcome, PFM assures that the financing is initiated, implemented and closed smoothly. Our depth of experience on a wide array of transactions requiring tailored yet flexible approaches and schedules gives us the organizational capacity, proficiency and foresight to manage a deal of any size or complexity.

The bond issuance process is one which contains a number of distinct, but inter-related steps. Our goal at PFM is to lead our clients’ borrowings through these steps to allow for a seamless and successful execution. Our philosophy is to ensure that the City is kept involved (to any degree which you desire), informed and educated on each step in the process to ensure you understand and are informed for the decisions to be made.

We have grouped the tasks within a transaction into six steps and included estimated timing for each:

Step 1: Developing a plan of finance
Team: Mike, Christine, Brian Timeline: 2-4 weeks
Unless not already determined by a specific recommendation, the first step within the transaction process is development of the plan of finance. At the outset, we will work with Roseville to (i) determine the amount of borrowing necessary, and (ii) analyze debt structuring alternatives and determine the most appropriate method of sale (negotiated, competitive or private placement). PFM will convene an all-hands meeting as soon as practical after the selection process is completed and will lead a thorough and organized discussion focused on the City’s specific goals and objectives for the financing and on the long-term sustainability of the City’s bond program.

Step 2: Assembling of the financing team and managing the schedule Team: Mike, Christine, Brian, Jaime, Louise, Connor Timeline: 4-6 weeks In our role as financial advisor, PFM has assisted our clients in selecting financial services professionals to the extent needed. These professionals may include underwriters, bond counsel, placement agents, verification consultants, trustees, printing firms, bond insurance companies and other debt issuance related providers. As the largest financial advisor in the nation, we have significant experience working with the major market participants including many of the team members Roseville has worked with in the past. With our understanding of market rates for fees, we are happy to assist as needed to negotiate fees with any existing team members or to assist the City in reevaluating its strategy.

We will also create a schedule and efficiently manage the team to meet milestones.

Provide a detailed discussion of your firm’s approach to the successful implementation of this project. Include thorough discussions of methodologies you believe are essential to accomplishing this project. Include a proposed work schedule to accomplish all of the required tasks within the desired timeline. Identify the staff who would be assigned to each task, including sub-consultants and sub-contractors. List any necessary equipment, training or installation services required.

City of Roseville - Request for Proposals RFP #10-031 Municipal Advisor 31 Step 3: Preparation and review of authorizing documents and disclosure document Team: Mike, Christine, Brian, Jaime, Louise, Connor Timeline: 5-6 weeks We will make sure that the financing plan is properly developed and well-defined in advance of the drafting of documents, that the authorizing resolution accurately reflects the financing plan, and that the content of the financing plan is well communicated to City staff and to City Council. PFM will assist the City and its disclosure counsel in the preparation and distribution of the preliminary and final official statements to provide the market with timely and accurate information about the City and any bond-related issues. The basic role of the financial advisor is to review and comment on the document before posting. At PFM, we play a larger role than that. Our standard practice is to help the City review and refine information for the sections of the document that address the financial operations of the City. Over time, we have been streamlining this process to make the development of preliminary official statements less burdensome on City staff.

Step 4: Development and implementation of credit and investor relations strategy Team: Mike, Christine, Brian, Jaime, Louise, Connor Timeline: 4-5 weeks With PFM’s national reach and our California-focused team for the City’s engagement, we have a strong understanding of the rating agency methodologies which drive bond ratings as well as the issues, concerns, and points of emphasis consistent with the City’s peers. We have developed specialized models to evaluate our local government clients’ credit based on the most recent rating criteria published by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, enabling us to assist in assessing the likely outcome of a rating process, as well as to evaluate the potential impact of financial and policy decisions on our clients’ credit ratings. PFM frequently discusses potential rating calibration changes with the rating agencies. This provides us additional insight into the evolution of their views and how current ratings may be affected.

PFM is a strong proponent of a well thought-out, comprehensive investor relations program designed to stimulate investor demand and enable an issuer to achieve lower costs of borrowing. In order to maximize the benefits of an investor relations program, outreach must encompass both institutional and retail investors, and the tools and techniques used should be targeted to the specific — and sometimes markedly different — investment decision making processes and drivers of both groups. The strongest factors impacting investor demand are (i) level of investor awareness of the sale, and (ii) understanding of the issuers’ credit and bond structure. Both of these factors benefit from proactive, strategic issuer outreach, both ongoing and transaction specific. PFM would be available to assist the City and its Underwriter(s) in the preparation of investor presentations with the goal of providing relevant information needed in order to maximize investor participation in the City’s financings.

Step 5: Management of the bond sale process and the establishment of interest rates Team: Mike, Christine, Brian, Jaime, Louise, Connor, Todd Timeline: 2 weeks PFM’s Pricing Group provides pricing resources and negotiation support for PFM’s clients nationwide – continually enhancing, expanding and centralizing the firm’s bond pricing expertise. The Pricing Group is in the market more than any financial advisor or underwriting firm, pricing on average 15-19 transactions each week.

We use high-level quantitative analysis to develop our own price views, independent of the underwriters. We analyze historical and comparable transactions on a maturity-by-maturity basis using a variety of analytical methods including our proprietary Option Adjusted Spread model. Beyond developing an interest-rate scale, we analyze different couponing structures, bond amortizations, and call features.

City of Roseville - Request for Proposals RFP #10-031 Municipal Advisor 32 We communicate early and often with the underwriting team, to specifically discuss pre-sale marketing efforts and strategies to reach target investors, offer our own
separate retail and institutional coupon and re-offering yield targets, and ensure that all parties are on the same page.

During the order period, we actively monitor the sale of the debt, discuss the orders and pricing strategy with the underwriting team, and provide constant feedback to the issuer. When negotiating with underwriters, our
suggested levels are based on real data and real market information to ensure that we are not “chasing” the
market later. Because the PFM Pricing Group often has
several transactions in the market, we are receiving up to the minute market feedback and are communicating
with multiple investment banks. Therefore, the issuer is not relying solely upon its senior manager. We also know which firms are putting their capital to work, what
strategies they prefer, and how to ensure they will
effectively price the City’s bonds.

Step 6: Assist with closing
Team: Mike, Christine, Brian, Jaime, Louise, Connor Timeline: 2-4 weeks We will assist with all aspects of closing including reviewing all closing documents and preparing a closing wire memorandum. We will manage the team to support a smooth pre-closing and closing process.

Sample Financing Schedule
To further illustrate the process described above, we have drafted a sample schedule below with a detailed financing schedule in Appendix B. Please note, the exact timing, steps, and working group participants will be customized depending on the transaction.

With PFM’s experienced team, no additional training is needed to provide the scope of services. [B:\City Attorney\corres\Kelly\Contracts 2025\Municipal Advisors PSA - PFM Financial Advisors JL edits.docx;03/19/2025] EXHIBIT “B”
City of Roseville - Request for Proposals RFP #10-031 Municipal Advisor 33 F. Cost Proposal
We greatly value the opportunity to work the City. We hope our commitment is reflected in the proposed rates below.

As discussed in Section C., we have a deep bench of team members who will devote all time necessary to support the City with its projects.

Annual Retainer
$25,000 ($6,250/quarter)
Transaction-Based Fees
PFM’s proposed fees for all bond or similar debt instrument related transactions are as follows:

PFM Transaction Fees (Utilities and General Fund)
Par Amount Fixed Fee
< $25 million $45,000
$25 million - $50 million $55,000
> $50 million $80,000
PFM Transaction Fees (CFDs)
Par Amount Fixed Fee
< $50 million $38,000
Credit Facility Replacement. Transaction-based fee would apply.

Complex Transactions. For complex transactions, such as POBs, gas prepayments or energy prepayments with the use of tax credit structures, PFM would negotiate a mutually agreed upon fee, which may exceed the range above based on the amount and complexity of work involved.

Structured Products. PFM Swap Advisors LLC professionals would oversee all elements of any swap transaction, and Roseville would have a separate engagement for those services. Such fee arrangements would be negotiated with Roseville and be fully transparent to all parties. Fees are usually set as 2/3 of one basis point per annum times the notional amount or invested balance outstanding over time, plus $10,000 per transaction.

Rate Adjustment: Fees will be subject to annual inflationary increases based on CPI on the annual anniversary of the contract execution.

Provide a total cost proposal for all products and services to be delivered, and a breakdown of costs delineated by tasks as described in your project plan. Include a schedule of hourly rates for all proposed staff and the amount of time each person will be devoted to this project. Define any reimbursable expenses requested to be paid by the City and identify which fees will be based on a not-to-exceed basis. (Any MSRB fees imposed upon municipal advisors should not be passed through to the issuer.)
City of Roseville - Request for Proposals RFP #10-031 Municipal Advisor 34 Special Projects Fees (As-Needed)
Hourly rates to be used for special projects not covered under the fees outlined above, such as the development of a specific financial model, would continue to be billed based upon PFM’s hourly rates or based upon mutually agreeable fixed fees. PFM’s proposed hourly rates are presented in the table below.

PFM Hourly Rates
Title Rate
Managing Director $400
Director $375
Senior Managing Consultant $350
Senior Analyst / Analyst $325
Rate Adjustment: All hourly rates will be subject to annual inflationary increases based on CPI on the annual anniversary of the contract execution.

Reimbursable Expenses
In addition to our fees, we would expect to be reimbursed for our data fees and out-of-pocket expenses, including travel, mileage, parking, meals, etc. Appropriate expense documentation and third-party receipts would be provided upon request with each invoice. We estimate travel expenses would be approximately $1,000 with local-only travel or $5,000 with out-of-state travel.

We do not want fees to be an obstacle to PFM being retained as Roseville’s financial advisor. We are willing to negotiate agreed-to fees that could better reflect the workload and complexity of particular transactions or set of transactions, and we are happy to discuss this proposal in greater detail with you and to provide any additional information.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3848
File #: 0800-02
Title: Five Star Intertie Improvement Project – Agreements Contact: William Montz 916-774-5545 [email protected] Meeting Date: 4/16/2025
Item #: 7.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) for construction, operation and maintenance of the Five Star Intertie Improvements Project;
2) Adopt a resolution to approve a Construction Agreement for the Project with Sierra National Construction, Inc. in the amount of $698,640 and authorize the City Manager to execute it; and 3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve and pay for contract change orders for this project that could increase the contract amount by no more than 10% ($69,864), for a not-toexceed total contract amount of $768,504.

BACKGROUND

1. MOU: In September 2010, the City of Roseville (City) entered into an agreement with PCWA, as a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Exploration into a Water Capacity Partnership. As part of the MOU, it was recognized that construction of additional water facilities for the benefit of sharing capacity, would provide redundancy and operational flexibility within each Party’s water system. The Parties anticipated that any future development or implementation of the partnership would be governed by future agreements(s), and approval of any such agreements will be subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all other applicable environmental laws or regulations.

Rehabilitation of the Five Star intertie between the City’s and PCWA’s water distribution systems was identified as a mutually beneficial project under the existing MOU. This MOU provides additional obligations to the Parties as it relates to this Construction Project and the subsequent maintenance obligations.

Under the proposed agreement, the City will retain and compensate the contractor and Construction Management (CM) services for the Project. Both PCWA and the City will perform their own programming for the Project, with programming equipment furnished by the contractor.

2. Construction Contract. To increase water supply resiliency and improve operational functionality, the City and PCWA desire to energize and automate the Intertie, which includes the replacement of the flow measurement instrument for automation compatibility. With improvements complete, the Intertie will be capable of remote monitoring and operation via PCWA’s Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and remote monitoring through the City’s SCADA system. The communication link between the Intertie and the City’s SCADA system will be through a fiber pathway, whereas the communication link between the Intertie and PCWA’s SCADA system will be via cellular wireless technology.

To energize the Intertie, an electric transformer, meter pedestal, and power distribution panel will be installed. Two process logic controllers (PLC) panels are required to communicate the signals from the Intertie to the City and PCWA SCADA systems.

On November 20, 2024, the plans and specifications for the project were approved by City Council and a Request for Bids for construction services was published on November 21, 2024.

On January 8, 2025, five contractors submitted proposals to the City Clerk’s office and a public bid opening identified Design-Build Inc. as the apparent lowest bidder. However, Design-Build Inc.’s proposal was disqualified due to unresponsiveness and Sierra National Construction Inc.’s proposal was identified and verified as the next lowest bidder.

FISCAL IMPACT
Under the proposed Agreement with PCWA, the Construction Agreement with Sierra National Construction, Inc. is $698,640, and the not-to-exceed change order authority request is for 10% ($69,864), making the total not-to-exceed contract value $768,504. Project funding is from available resources in the Water Construction Fund. The Water Construction Fund is funded by water connection fees paid for by developers.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Agreement with PCWA is not a “project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guideline Section 15378). The execution of this Agreement will not result in approval or authorization of any physical projects. Consequently, no CEQA action is required for the Agreement.

For the Construction Agreement, this project qualifies for a Class 1 Exemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The project involves modification of existing facilities to increase water distribution system operational flexibility. The improvements do not result in expansion of use. No sensitive resources are present on the project site. Therefore, the Class 1 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
William Montz, Assistant Engineer
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-103
PCWA Agreement
Resolution 25-104
Agreement with Sierra National
Bid Summary Sheet
CEQA
RESOLUTION NO. 25-103

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN PLACER COUNTY WATER

AGENCY AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Construction, Operation and Maintenance of the Five Star Intertie Improvements, by and between Placer County Water Agency and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY

AND CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR

CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE

FIVE STAR INTERTIE IMPROVEMENTS
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY, hereinafter called "Agency" and the CITY OF ROSEVILLE, hereinafter called “City,” (collectively referred to as “Parties” or individually as “Party”) shall be effective on the date executed by the Agency and City.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Agency and City entered into an agreement titled Contract Between the Placer County Water Agency and the City of Roseville Relating to Water Supplies and Exchanges dated September 1, 2010, and amended on May 23, 2023 (hereafter “Water Supply Contract”); and
WHEREAS, the Water Supply Contract specifies the provisions and conditions of the annual water entitlement amounts, supply reliability exchanges, emergency deliveries, and capacity sharing between the two Parties. The Water Supply Contract dictates the times and quantities of its annual water entitlements, the semiannual payment structure, and required maintenance fees; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 amendment to Water Supply Contract provides for the City’s annual entitlement of up to 30,000 acre-feet of untreated water in drier years and up to 44,000 acre-feet in most years from the Agency's Middle Fork Project (based upon an incremental "build up" schedule), with delivery of the untreated water from the Agency to the City at Folsom Reservoir; and
2 WHEREAS, delivery of water from Folsom Reservoir is subject to United States Bureau of Reclamation ("USBR") operations of its Central Valley Project ("CVP") and is vulnerable to drought when reservoir levels can become extraordinarily low and fall below the intake serving the City and halt delivery of water provided under the Water Supply Contract, as well as the City's CVP supply from the USBR; and
WHEREAS, the Agency and City recognize that in the aforementioned drought and low reservoir level times, there may be a need for the City to purchase water from the Agency, necessitating improvements to accomplish this; and
WHEREAS, the Agency and City jointly agreed to explore leveraging their existing water capacity by strategically sharing reasonable portions of existing capacity and exploring new water delivery options to the City through the Agency’s pump stations and existing infrastructure through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered by the Parties on May 6, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as “2020 MOU”). The Parties agreed to split equally the costs of any outside services undertaken pursuant to the 2020 MOU and individually bear the cost of each Parties’ respective staff time, overhead, and other internal costs among other responsibilities set forth in the 2020 MOU; and
WHEREAS, the initial explorations provided through the 2020 MOU, found that improvements to the manually operated intertie between the Parties at Five Star Boulevard would be the first mutually beneficial project to entertain; and WHEREAS, other additional projects may be pursued as future explorations continue through the 2020 MOU; and
3 WHEREAS, the Five Star Boulevard Intertie connects the City’s treated water to the Agency’s 12-inch treated water pipelines and is estimated to convey up to 4 MGD to the City for additional reliability; and
WHEREAS, the Agency and City jointly agree that improvements to the existing Five Star Intertie located on or about 6710 Stanford Ranch Road, Roseville CA 95678 (APN: 017-123- 043-000) (hereinafter referred to as “Five Star Facility”,) are required to improve operational functionality, redundancy, and water supply resiliency for the benefit of the City. Therefore, the Parties are working jointly to design and install improvements at the Five Star Intertie; reference and incorporated herein by a set of plans and specifications entitled “Five Star Intertie Improvement Project” (herein referred to as “Plans”) prepared by GHD Inc., at 943 Reserve Drive, Roseville, CA 95678; and that will include the installation of equipment to automate and provide remote capabilities for monitoring and operating the Five Star Intertie, as well as upgrading flow measurement equipment for compatibility; and
WHEREAS, the Agency is willing to accept ownership of the Five Star Facility in accordance with the Plans; and
WHEREAS, the Five Star Facility was designed by GHD Inc., a consultant, hired by the City on July 21, 2021 (hereinafter “Consultant”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to engage a qualified construction contractor (hereinafter “Contractor”). The costs for the Consultant’sservices and the Contractor will be borne as outlined in Section 5 of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS it is the Parties’ intention that by signing this Agreement, the Agency hereby, grants the Contractor permission to access the Agency’s service area to install all the 4 work, as outlined in this Agreement and in the Plans.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED as follows:

1. Incorporation of Recitals: The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by reference.

2. Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to memorialize the Parties’ agreement with respect to the design and construction of the Five Star Facility which is intended to increase water supply resiliency between the Agency and City.

3. No Transfer of Authority: Except as otherwise set forth herein, nothing in this Agreement grants the Parties any power or authority to alter any water right, contract right, or any similar right of any Party, or to direct the water-delivery practices of any Party without the prior written consent of the other Party and receipt of all required approvals.

4. Proposed Facility: The Five Star Facility to be installed modifies an existing facility with system automation, flow monitoring equipment, and associated telemetry.

5. Timing and Terms for Designing and Constructing Facilities: The Parties agree to the following conditions for the proposed installation of the Five Star Facility:
a) Design and Construction
i. The City shall be responsible for retaining and compensating the Consultant for the design portion of the work called for under this Agreement.
ii. The City shall be responsible for paying all costs incurred by PCWA for services under this Agreement, including but not limited to inspections, plans review, submittals review, and coordination.
5 iii. Plans for the proposed Five Star facility shall be developed by Consultant and approved by the City and the Agency (which such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld).
iv. The City shall be responsible for retaining the Contractor to perform the work called for under this Agreement and all costs under this Agreement and the City’s agreement with the Contractor.
v. The Agency and City shall mutually agree on a method to coordinate construction administration, construction engineering and design, construction surveying, shop drawing review, communications and meetings, traffic control, scheduling, inspection and testing of the work that pertain to design, construction, and installation of the Agency Facilities.
vi. The City shall be responsible for retaining and paying all costs associated with managing the construction contract, including construction management, testing, and inspection services under this Agreement. vii. The Agency shall perform all programming of their Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and configure their switch and radio for their telemetry setup. The Contractor will furnish the PLC, switch, and radio and provide to the Agency. Costs incurred by the Agency for all programming shall be reimbursed by the City.
viii. The City shall submit to the Agency for review and approval all change orders affecting the Agency Facilities prior to the City’s approval and 6 execution of such change orders. The City will be responsible for all other Project-related change orders, delays, and extra work incurred by the contractor. The Agency and City will jointly work to negotiate change order requests and claims by the contractor to resolve any claims directly related to the Agency Facilities in a timely manner, provided that neither the City nor the Agency shall agree to the resolution of any such change order request or claim without the other's approval. In the event agreement cannot be reached related to active ongoing work within three (3) working days of presentation of a critical request for change order or claim, the City shall have the right to direct the contractor to proceed on a force account basis.
b) Delineation of Ownership
i. PCWA shall own all facilities north of the existing MJxFL adapter, downstream of the flow meter, within the flow meter vault. As denoted on the Five Star Intertie Improvement Project Plans.
ii. The City shall own all facilities south of the existing MJxFL adapter, downstream of the flow meter, within the flow meter vault. As denoted on the Five Star Intertie Improvement Project Plans.
iii. The City shall own certain telemetry facilities and all electronic connections designated to send electronic data to the City at the Five Star Facility, whenever such facilities are installed.
7 iv. The Agency shall own the system automation, flow monitoring and associated telemetry (that provide data to the Agency) at the Five Star Facility, whenever such facilities are installed.

6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) days advance written notice.

7. Time: This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by all Parties. The City and Agency commit to working together expeditiously to have the Five Star Facility installed no later than Fall 2025, barring any reasonably unforeseen circumstances outside of the control of either Party.

8. Plans: It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to prepare plans and specifications for installing the Five Star Facility and submit them to the City and the Agency for acceptance, pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement. All materials to be furnished and all construction shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications. The plans and specifications, when approved in writing by the City and the Agency, shall become a part of this Agreement.

9. Installation of Facilities: The Contractor will install the Five Star Facility described in the plans and specifications accepted by the City and the Agency in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, including but not limited to Section 5, and the Improvement Standards.

10. Property and Right of Entry: The Agency agrees to allow the City, Consultant, and Contractor, access and a right of entry upon the Five Star Facility, for the limited purpose of performing the work called for under this Agreement and for ongoing access required for the 8 operation and maintenance of the City’s telemetry facilities. Agency acknowledges it is not conveying any other property interest in the Five Star Facility, other than those delineated in this Agreement, specifically this Section 10 and Section 5 above.

The Parties agree and acknowledge that they will endeavor to have the Five Star Facility called for under this Agreement installed in existing Public Utility Easements (hereinafter “PUE”) or other public rights of way (hereinafter “ROW”). If the Five Star Facility called for under this Agreement cannot be installed in existing PUE or ROW, City, at the City’s sole cost and expense, shall be responsible for determining whether any private property rights need to be acquired for installation of the Five Star Facility and whether such acquisition is feasible. Should the City determine the acquisition is not feasible, then that portion of the work will not proceed.

Should the City determine that the acquisition of private property rights is feasible, the City will be solely responsible for providing to the Agency any real property rights necessary for the Five Star Facility to be installed, and for the ongoing operation and maintenance thereof. Any such real property rights shall include any consent or endorsement of all lienholders, lessees, or other parties with any interest in the real property being conveyed. The City shall provide the Agency with exhibits identifying all locations requiring the acquisition of real property rights and the Agency shall provide the City with the appropriate document for the associated real property rights to be acquired by the City. The City shall provide to the Agency a copy or copies of the recorded document or documents conveying the real property rights.

11. Grade Established: No work shall be performed or installation made until street subgrades have been established to the satisfaction of the City and the Agency. 9 12. Environmental Permitting Services: The Agency will coordinate with the City, and provide support for these services. The City shall be responsible for serving as the lead agency, providing any environmental permitting services.

13. Acceptance: The City and Agency shall accept the complete Five Star Facility, when a) the facilities are satisfactorily installed in accordance with the City and the Agency’s approved plans and specifications;
b) all grading and paving is completed;
c) any required easements are received, accepted and recorded by the City and the Agency; and
d) two (2) copies of any recorded final map with addresses marked for each lot or parcel are provided.

Immediately upon acceptance, all rights, titles, and interest in the Five Star Facility shall be vested in the Parties as set forth in this Agreement. Within 30 days from acceptance, the Agency shall invoice the City for the costs of work performed pursuant to Section 5. The City shall make such payment in full within 30 days of receipt. The City and Agency, if mutually agreed upon in writing, may operate the Five Star Facility in advance of acceptance.

14. Long-Term Operation and Maintenance: The Water Supply Contract specifies the provisions and conditions of the annual water entitlement amounts, supply reliability exchanges, emergency deliveries, and capacity sharing between the two Parties. The Water Supply Contract dictates the times and quantities of its annual water entitlements, the semiannual payment structure, and required maintenance fees. 10 a) Operations
i. The City shall request written notification (at least 48 hours in advance) of needing water through the Five Star Facility. Such requests shall contain an estimated maximum daily quantity of water to be delivered and an estimated length of time that water is to be delivered.
ii. The City designated contact will be the Operations Manager and the Agency’s designated contact will be the Director of Technical Services. iii. In the event of an emergency, the City may request an immediate delivery of water. City operators shall contact and coordinate directly with the Agency’s distribution operators. The Agency’s distribution operators shall have the discretion to furnish up to 4 MGD to the City through the Five Star Facility. A list of emergency contacts for each Party is provided in Exhibit A attached to and made a part of this MOU.
iv. The Five Star Facility is not intended for intermittent peaking. v. The PRV intertie is designed to be operated on a flow control mode (primary) and Pressure Control Mode (secondary).
b) Maintenance
i. Each Party is responsible for the maintenance, repairs, and capital replacements of the portion of the Five Star Facility they own. The 11 Parties agree that they will always maintain their portion of the Five Star Facility in good and usable condition.
ii. The City is responsible for all utility expenses at this facility, including electricity and fiber communications.
iii. The Agency is responsible for any expenses associated with telemetry facilities and all electronic connections designated to send electronic data to the Agency.
iv. The Agency will provide ongoing access required for the operation and maintenance of the City’s telemetry facilities.
v. The Agency will provide ongoing access required for the operation and maintenance of the City’s telemetry facilities.

15. Inspection of Books: The proper officers or agents of any Party shall have reasonably full and free access at all reasonable times to the account books and official records of the other Party, insofar as they pertain to matters and things provided for in this Agreement.

16. Indemnification:
a) The Agency and City agree that each shall mutually defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other, and their directors, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, from all claims, costs, losses, damages and expenses (including attorney's fees of any kind) arising from their respective negligence (including claims for personal injury or death, damage to property, damages due to runoff onto other properties, and loss of business), arising from the 1) design of the Five Star Facility, 2) performance of work under this Agreement, 3) 12 performance of construction at the Five Star Facility, 4) or challenges to the adequacy of the environmental review for such work.
b) The Agency and City also agree that the construction agreement with Contractor for the performance of work under this Agreement (and any subcontract entered into by Contractor for the performance of work called for under this Agreement) shall require that the Contractor and subcontractor defend, indemnify and save harmless the City and the Agency and their directors, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, from all claims, costs, losses, damages and expenses (including attorney's fees of any kind) arising from the Contractor's performance of the work called for under this Agreement, including claims for personal injury or death, damage to property, damages due to runoff onto other properties, and loss of business. Contractor and subcontractor's indemnity, defense and hold harmless obligations will belimited only to the extent any such damages, losses and/or injuries directly result from the negligent acts or omissions, breach of contract or willful misconduct of the Contractor or its subcontractors.

17. Insurance: The Parties agree to maintain insurance, or hereby certify that they are self-insured, at the minimum insurance limits discussed below:
a) General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 million aggregate b) Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit c) Workers' Compensation: Statutory
d) Policies must be primary and non-contributory
13 The Parties further agree that the City shall require the Contractor to furnish the Agency with a certificate(s) of insurance and Additional Insured Endorsement (ISO CG 2010) or equivalent as satisfactory proof that Contractor (and any of its subcontractors) carries the minimum insurance required by this Agreement. Additionally, the City shall require the Contractor to include Placer County Water Agency as a named insured on those required insurance policies.

18. Performance and Payment Bonds: Prior to construction of any of the Five Star Facility and during all such construction, the City shall require Contractor to provide and maintain a Performance Bond and a Public Works Payment Bond each with a penal sum of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the Five Star Facility. The Performance Bond and Public Works Payment Bond shall be in a form acceptable to the City. Contractor shall be required to maintain the Performance Bond and Payment Bond at all times during the life of this Agreement and until the completion and acceptance of the Five Star Facility by the City and the Agency and any applicable warranty/maintenance period. All bonds shall be issued by California admitted surety insurers.

19. Assignment of Agreement: The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties, but no assignment or transfer of this Agreement, or any part hereof, or interest herein, shall be valid until and unless approved by the City and the Agency. Such approval will not be unreasonably denied.

20. Notices: All notices that are required either expressly or by implication to be given by any party to the other under this Agreement shall only be signed by authorized officers of the notifying party. All notices to Parties required by this Agreement shall be hand-delivered or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, to the following addresses:
14 City of Roseville Placer County Water Agency
Environmental Utilities Director Director of Technical Services 2005 Hilltop Circle, P.O. Box 6570
Roseville, CA 95747 Auburn, CA 95604

21. Miscellaneous Terms:
a) Remedies. The use by any Party of any remedy specified for the enforcement of this Agreement is not exclusive and shall not deprive the Party using such remedy of, or limit the application of, any other remedy provided by law.
b) Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be in Placer County, California. The Parties each waive any federal court removal and/or jurisdictional rights they may have. c) Severability. If one or more clauses, sentences, paragraphs or provisions of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable, it is hereby agreed by the Parties that the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and will continue in full force and effect, but only to the extent that the intent of the Parties can be effectuated without the provision(s) held unlawful, invalid or unenforceable. Such clauses, sentences, paragraphs or provisions shall be deemed reformed so as to be lawful, valid and enforced to the maximum extent possible.
d) Prevailing Wage. The Parties acknowledge that the construction work called for under this Agreement by Contractor requires the paying of 15 prevailing wages.
e) Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and previous communications or agreements pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby superseded.

Any revisions may be made only by a written amendment to this Agreement, signed by all Parties to this Agreement.
f) Dispute Resolution. In recognition of the negative consequences associated with disputes both in terms of lost time and expense to all Parties, the Parties agree to attempt to settle their disputes by good-faith, non-binding mediation as a condition precedent to the institution of legal proceedings by any Party. Request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the other Parties to this Agreement. If mediation would jeopardize the substantive rights of any Party including, but not limited to, the application of any applicable statute of limitations or other timing requirement, then such Party may proceed to enforce such rights notwithstanding this mediation requirement and mediation will be required during the dispute resolution process to the extent it may be used without jeopardizing the substantive rights of any Party. The Parties shall share the mediator’s fee and any filing fees equally. The mediation shall be held in Placer County, California unless another location is mutually agreed upon.
g) Headings. The paragraph headings used in this Agreement are intended for 16 convenience only and shall not be used in interpreting this Agreement or in determining any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.
h) No Third Party Beneficiaries. The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement creates rights and obligations solely between the Parties and is not intended to benefit any other party. No provision of this Agreement shall in any way inure to the benefit of any third person so as to constitute any such third person as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement or any of its items of conditions, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto.
i) Reasonable Cooperation; No Agency. The Parties will reasonably cooperate with each other, including the execution of all necessary documents required to perform the obligations under this Agreement, and to carry out the purpose and intent of this Agreement; provided that each Party understands and agrees that there is no agency or joint venture relationship between the Parties, and no Party is authorized to act for or on behalf of any other Party except as expressly authorized under this Agreement.
j) Construction and Interpretation. This Agreement is entered into freely and voluntarily. This Agreement has been arrived at through negotiation, and each Party has had a full and fair opportunity to revise the terms of this Agreement. Consequently, the normal rule of construction that any 17 ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not apply in construing or interpreting this Agreement.
k) Waiver. The waiver at any time by a Party of its rights with respect to a default or other matter arising in connection with this Agreement will not be deemed a waiver with respect to any other default or matter. l) Allocation of Liabilities. The Parties expressly agree that the debts, liabilities and obligations of each Party shall remain the debts, liabilities and obligations of that Party and shall not be the debts, liabilities and obligations of the other Parties.
m) Attorney’s Fees. In any action brought by either Party to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney’s fees.
n) Privileges and Immunities. All of the privileges and immunities from liability; exemptions from laws, ordinances and rules; and all pension, relief, disability, worker's compensation and other benefits that apply to the activity of officers, agents or employees of the Parties when performing their respective functions for those Parties will, to the extent permitted by law, apply to them to the same degree and extent while engaged in the performance of any of the functions and other duties under this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed by the Parties that, notwithstanding anything contained herein, the employees of each Party shall continue to be entirely and exclusively under the direction, 18 supervision, and control of the employing Party.
o) Counterparts. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement may be executed and delivered in counterparts which, when taken together, shall constitute a fully executed Agreement. In addition, this Agreement may be executed via electronic pdf transmission and any such pdf signature shall be deemed to be an original signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date written below.

PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY
BY:

Date:

ATTEST:

Clerk, Board of Directors

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
BY:

Date:

ATTEST:

City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 25-104

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SIERRA NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, an Agreement for the Five Star Intertie Improvement project, by and between the City of Roseville and Sierra National Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Five Star Intertie Improvements Project
Project Location: The Intertie improvements would be constructed within an existing intertie station, and within public right of way, located at the northwest corner of Five Star Boulevard and Stanford Ranch Rad at 6710 Stanford Ranch Road in the City of Roseville, Placer County, CA (APN: 017-123-043-000).

Project Description: The Roseville Environmental Utilities Department proposes construction of improvements as follows: The Five Star Intertie is a manually operated intertie between the City and the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA). To improve operational functionality, this project would entail installation of equipment to automate and provide remote capabilities via cellular wireless technology for monitoring and operation of the intertie via a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. Since the location does not have power service, a new transformer is required, which will be tied into the existing junction box. The project will also include replacement of any flow measurement instruments for automation compatibility. The project does not include any new long-term water supply; it only allows for more efficient distribution of existing surface and ground water supplies.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency Carrying Out Project: Roseville Environmental Utilities Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 1 Exemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 1 consists of …. minor alteration of existing public …. facilities….involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing…. examples include but are not limited to: (b) Existing facilities of both investor and publicly-owned utilities used to provide electric power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services;” The project involves modification of existing facilities to increase water distribution system operational flexibility. The improvements do not result in expansion of use. No sensitive resources are present on the project site. Therefore the Class 1 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: William Montz, Roseville Environmental Utilities Department, 2005 Hilltop Circle, Roseville, CA 95747 (916) 774-5545.

Signature: Date: 5-24-2023
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3841
File #: 0800-02
Title: Sewer System Management Plan Recertification
Contact: Tracie Mueller 916-746-1812 [email protected] Meeting Date: 4/16/2025
Item #: 7.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to recertify the City of Roseville’s Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP).

BACKGROUND
The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) issued a Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) Order No. 2006-0003-DWQ in May 2006. Under this WDR, all public entities that own or operate a sanitary sewer system greater than one mile in length that collects or conveys wastewater must prepare a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). The intent of the SSMP is to facilitate proper funding, operation and management of the sanitary sewer system to reduce sanitary sewer spills, their impacts to the State’s water bodies, and to protect public health. The City’s SSMP must be certified by the Roseville City Council and recertified when major updates are made to the plan.

The Roseville City Council adopted and certified the original SSMP in 2007. In October 2022, the Roseville City Council recertified the City’s SSMP based on recommended changes proposed during an audit by an outside consultant.

On June 6, 2023, the SWRCB issued an updated WDR, Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ. This order replaced the old order and provided updated guidance and regulations related to owning and operating a sanitary sewer system designed to convey sewage. This updated guidance and regulation required an update to the City’s SSMP. In addition, the Wastewater Collection System underwent a required periodic audit by an outside consultant using the current SSMP.

Recommendations were made as to edits and additions needed for compliance with the new WDR and audit findings. These recommendations have been incorporated into an updated SSMP which includes terminology changes, changes to the City’s sewer emergency response plan, naming and classification of spills for reporting purposes, as well as other minor edits and clean up items.

The certified 2022 edition SSMP, the proposed updated SSMP and associated documents, and the new updated WDR are provided for background. Proposed changes to the 2022 certified SSMP were not provided due to the number of formatting changes made. Following is a summary of changes made in the proposed SSMP:

The term SSO (Sanitary Sewer Overflow) changed to Spill throughout the document per the new updated WDR.

A change in terminology and classification of spills on Pages 16-17 of the proposed SSMP.

There are 4 categories of spills, all of which changed when compared to the previous SSMP. This is due to changes in the new updated WDR from the SWRCB.

Attachment D of the new updated WDR is the guidance document for the requirements of the SSMP. Excerpts from this Attachment have been added and updated throughout the proposed SSMP to provide clarity on the intent of most sections for reference purposes.

Appendix 10.6 – SSMP Performance Audit has been added to provide a required updated audit report.

Appendix 9.3 – Spill History has been updated to provide up to date spill information.

Appendix 6 – the Spill Emergency Response Plan has been updated per the new updated WDR.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended action of recertification of the City of Roseville Sewer System Management Plan does not have a direct fiscal impact. The costs for compliance for all elements of the SSMP are funded annually through the Wastewater Operations Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves an action taken by the City of Roseville to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves protection of the environment. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 8 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15308). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Tracie Mueller, Wastewater Utility Manager
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Sewer System Management Plan 2025
Resolution 25-097
Updated Order - WDR Sanitary Sewer
Sewer System Management Plan 2022
Notice of Exemption
Sewer System Management Plan
For
City of Roseville
WDID 5SSO10935
Revised 12 MAR 2025
2 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Table of Contents
SSMP Change Log ...............................................................................................................................5 List of Acronyms............................................................................................................................... 12 List of Terms..................................................................................................................................... 14 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 18 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Sewer System Management Plan Requirements................................................................................ 19 City Historical Spill Performance ....................................................................................................... 19 0 SSMP Overview............................................................................................................................. 20 1 Goals and Introduction.................................................................................................................. 21

1.1 SSMP Goals............................................................................................................................... 21

1.2 SSMP Plan Update..................................................................................................................... 22

1.3 Sewer System Asset Overview................................................................................................... 22

1.4 Updated Sewer System Map...................................................................................................... 23 2 Organization................................................................................................................................. 25

2.1 Legally Responsible Official (LRO) .............................................................................................. 25

2.2 SSMP Responsibility Chart......................................................................................................... 25

2.3 Organizational Lines of Authority .......................................................................................... 27

2.4 Chain of Communication Reporting Chart .................................................................................. 28 3 Legal Authority ............................................................................................................................. 30

3.1 Industrial Pretreatment Program............................................................................................... 32

3.2 Design and Construction Standards............................................................................................ 32

3.3 Sewer Access Authority.............................................................................................................. 32

3.4 Fats Oils and Grease.................................................................................................................. 32

3.5 Regulation of Sewer Use-Enforcement ....................................................................................... 33

3.6 Inter – Agency and Satellite Agreements................................................................................ 33

3.6.1 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement South Placer Wastewater Authority ..............................33

3.6.2 South Placer Wastewater Facilities Operation and Use Agreement........................................33

3.6.3 Contract and Operating Agreement between SRCSD and SASD ..............................................33

3.7 Legal Authority Documents.................................................................................................... 33 4 Operation and Maintenance.......................................................................................................... 35

4.1 Collection System Maps and Information ............................................................................... 35

4.1.1 Map Update Policy ...................................................................................................................36

4.2 Operation and Maintenance .................................................................................................. 37

4.2.1 Preventative Maintenance Program ........................................................................................38 3 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.2.2 Corrective Maintenance Program ............................................................................................40

4.2.3 Infrastructure Repair ................................................................................................................41

4.3 Training and Certification....................................................................................................... 43

4.3.1 New Hires .................................................................................................................................43

4.3.2 Training and Tracking ...............................................................................................................43

4.3.3 Certification ..............................................................................................................................45

4.4 Equipment and Critical Spare Parts Inventory......................................................................... 45

4.5 Critical Spare Parts................................................................................................................. 46 5 Design and Performance Provisions............................................................................................... 49

5.1 Sanitary Sewer Design Standards ........................................................................................... 49

5.1.1 Sanitary Sewer Construction Standards...................................................................................49

5.1.2 Comprehensive Response to Climate Impact...........................................................................50

5.2 Sewer System Construction and Performance Testing............................................................. 50

5.2.1 Testing Of Installed Improvements ..........................................................................................50

5.2.2 Punchlist Process......................................................................................................................53

5.2.3 Repairing Installed Improvements ...........................................................................................53 6 Spill Emergency Response Plan...................................................................................................... 55

6.1 Notification Procedures......................................................................................................... 55

6.2 Emergency Response Procedures........................................................................................... 57

6.2.1 Goals of SERP............................................................................................................................57

6.2.2 Respond and Assess..................................................................................................................57

6.2.3 Spill Categories .........................................................................................................................58

6.2.4 Spill Containment .....................................................................................................................59

6.2.5 Traffic Control (WWC Personnel) .............................................................................................61

6.2.6 Correct Cause............................................................................................................................61

6.2.7 Final Volume Estimate (WWC Personnel) ................................................................................63

6.2.8 Initiate Cleanup (WWC Personnel)...........................................................................................68

6.2.9 Receiving Water Sampling (Industrial Waste Section) .............................................................68

6.2.10 Notification Requirements (Superintendent/Supervisor)........................................................69

6.3 Staff and Contractor Training ................................................................................................. 69

6.4 Spill Mitigation and Containment........................................................................................... 70 SSOERP – SSO Start Time Policy......................................................................................................... 73 SSOERP – Flooded Structure Procedures ............................................................................................ 74 SSOERP – Water Quality Sampling..................................................................................................... 75 SSOERP – Sewer Call For Service ........................................................................................................ 77 SSOERP – Sewer Lift Station Failure Response.................................................................................... 78 SSOERP – SSO Chain of Communication ............................................................................................. 79 7 Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program ........................................................................................... 81

7.1 Public Education Outreach..................................................................................................... 82 4 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

7.2 FOG Disposal Plan.................................................................................................................. 82

7.3 Legal Authority...................................................................................................................... 82

7.4 GRD, Design Standards, BMPs, Recordkeeping and Reporting ................................................. 83

7.4.1 Requirement to Install GRD......................................................................................................83

7.4.2 Design Standards......................................................................................................................83

7.4.3 Best Management Practices.....................................................................................................84

7.4.4 Records and Reporting Requirements......................................................................................84

7.5 Authority to Inspect............................................................................................................... 84

7.6 Hot Spot Identification and PM Schedule ............................................................................... 84

7.7 FOG Source Control Measures................................................................................................ 85 8 System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan and Capital Improvements................................... 87

8.1 System Evaluation and Condition Assessment ........................................................................ 87

8.2 Capacity Assessment and Design Criteria................................................................................ 88

8.3 Prioritization of Corrective Action .......................................................................................... 88

8.4 Capital Improvement Plan ..................................................................................................... 89 9 Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modification ................................................................... 91

9.1 Metrics to Prioritize SSMP Activities....................................................................................... 91

9.2 Monitor and Measure Element Effectiveness.......................................................................... 91

9.3 SSMP Performance Monitoring and Update Process............................................................... 93

9.4 Spill Trends............................................................................................................................ 93

9.5 Monitoring, Measurement & Modification............................................................................. 93 10 Program Audit and Annual Report............................................................................................. 95

10.1 Audit Process Summary ......................................................................................................... 95

10.2 SSMP Audit Documents ......................................................................................................... 95 11 Communication Program........................................................................................................... 97

11.1 Purpose of the Communication Program................................................................................ 97

11.2 SSMP Development and Implementation ............................................................................... 97

11.3 Public Outreach..................................................................................................................... 97

11.3.1 Utility Exploration Center.........................................................................................................98

11.3.2 Live Sewer Smart ......................................................................................................................98

11.4 Tributary/Satellite Communication ........................................................................................ 98 5 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

SSMP CHANGE LOG
Order WQ 2022-0103-DWG Specification Section 5.5
During the time period in between SSMP updates, the Enrollee shall continuously document changes to its SSMP in a change log attached to the SSMP. These records will demonstrate when a subsection(s) was changed or updated and who authorized the change. 6 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
City of Roseville-SSMP Change Log
Date Section Comments Approval
12/11/13
A complete update of SSMP, both
intranet version, and city website
version
Chris Bracco
1/9/14 Supporting Documents for SSMP
Audit\SSMP Resoultion_14.pdf Council resolution for SSMP adoption Chris Bracco 4/7/14
Supporting Documents for SSMP
Audit\Roseville SSMP Audit FY13 -
FINAL.pdf
Final SSMP Audit- Waterworks
Engineering Chris Bracco
4/7/14 Supporting Documents for SSMP
Audit\SSMP Resoultion_14.pdf SSMP Resolution 2014 Chris Bracco 3/24/15 Appendix B\APPENDIX B1_Contact List.doc
Updated Rich Plecker as Utility
Director Chris Bracco
3/24/15 Appendix B\APPENDIX B2_Contact List.doc
Updated Dave Rawe as claims
administrator Chris Bracco
4/30/15 Master_Roseville_SSMP.doc Added Goal re: design and construction standards Chris Bracco
9/8/16 Appendix B\APPENDIX B1_Contact List.doc
Updated City Council/PUC members
per 14/15 Audit Rec. Chris Bracco
10/31/16 Appendix B\APPENDIX B2_Contact List.doc
Updated RWQCB Contact
Information Chris Bracco
10/31/16
Appendix C\Appendix C-7 Contract
and Operations Agreement
SASD_SRCSD.pdf
Contract with SASD & Sac Regional Chris Bracco
10/31/16 Appendix G\Appendix G-4 FOG
Inspection Form.pdf Addition of FOG Inspection Form Chris Bracco 9/22/16
Appendix I\Appendix I-4 - Key
Performance Indicators
Benchmarking.xlsx
Addition of Key Performance
Indicator Sheet Chris Bracco
10/31/16 Appendix J\Appendix J-1_Rsvl
WWC SSMP Audit Procedure.doc SSMP Audit procedures Chris Bracco 9/25/19 Appendix B\APPENDIX B1_Contact List.doc Updated council and PUC Chris Bracco 9/25/19 Appendix B\APPENDIX B2_Contact List.doc Update contact information Chris Bracco 7 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
City of Roseville-SSMP Change Log
9/25/19 Appendix C\APPENDIX C-3
Sanitary Sewer Design.doc Update Link Chris Bracco
9/25/19 Appendix D\Appendix D-5 CWEA
Certification.docx Chris Bracco
9/25/19 Appendix F\Appendix F-1\4_SSO
Field Report.pdf
Updated SSO overflow charts in field
report
Chris Bracco
9/25/19
Appendix F\Appendix F-1\2_SSO
Emergency Response
Procedures.pdf
Added updated field report Chris Bracco
9/25/19 Appendix F\Appendix F-1\1_SSO
Flowchart.pdf Chris Bracco
9/25/19
Appendix I\APPENDIX I-4 Key
Performance Indicators
Benchmarking.pdf
Chris Bracco
9/25/19
SSMP Audit_ Update Data\SSMP
Audit Update FY
15_18\Roseville_SSMP_Audit_FY15-
18 - FINAL-stamped.pdf
Chris Bracco
10/14/19 Completed Update of SSMP both
intranet and City Website version Chris Bracco
5/13/20 Appendix B\APPENDIX B1_Contact List.pdf
Added Kevin Ryan Supervisor to
contact list Chris Bracco
5/13/20 Appendix B\APPENDIX B2_Contact List.pdf
Added Kevin Ryan Supervisor to
contact list Chris Bracco
5/13/20 Appendix F\Appendix F-1\3_SSO
Notification Guide .doc
Added Kevin Ryan Supervisor to
contact list Chris Bracco
5/13/20
Appendix I\Appendix I-4 Key
Performance Indicators
Benchmarking.pdf
KPI sheet with updated numbers Chris Bracco
2/05/22 Update and re-write the entire SSMP
SSMP was re-formatted and
subsequent changes to operation and
maintenance have been included.

Daniel Pruden
10/05/22 SSMP Certification City Council Resolution 22-382 Daniel Pruden 06/11/24 SSMP Internal Audit
SSMP Audit conducted by Fischer
Compliance using the re-issued order
2022-103-DWQ
Daniel Pruden
8 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
City of Roseville-SSMP Change Log
10/30/24 SSMP Internal Audit Certification Certified audit was complete on CIWQS Daniel Pruden
3/12/25 SSMP Update
Updated SSMP per the internal audit
and the re-issued order 2022-0103-
DWQ
Daniel Pruden
4/16/25 SSMP Certification SSMP Approved by City Council Daniel Pruden 9 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
City of Roseville-SSMP Change Log
10 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
City Council Resolution
11 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

T H I S P A G E L E F T I N T E N T I O N A L L Y B L A N K 12 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

LIST OF ACRONYMS
BMP Best Management Practice
CASA California Association of Sanitation Agencies
CCTV Closed-Circuit Television
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CIP Capital Improvement Plan or Capital Improvement Project City City of Roseville
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System
CM Corrective Maintenance
CMMS Computerized Maintenance Management System
CBT Computer Based Training
CWEA California Water Environment Association
CVCWA Central Valley Clean Water Association
EDU Equivalent Dwelling Unit
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ERP Emergency Response Plan
EUD Environmental Utilities Department
FOG Fats, Oils, and Grease
FSE Food Service Establishments
GIS Geographical Information System
GPS Global Positioning System
GRD Grease Removal Device
GWDR General Waste Discharge Requirements or Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) I/I Inflow / Infiltration
ICS Incident Command System
IERP Integrated Emergency Response Plan
IWD Industrial Waste Division
LRO Legally Responsible Official
MGD million gallons per day
MRP Monitoring and Reporting Program
NASSCO National Association of Sewer System Companies
NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OERP Overflow Emergency Response Plan
OES Office of Emergency Services
Order SWRCB Order No. 2006-0003-DWQ adopted May 2, 2006 PACP Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program
PdM Predictive Maintenance
PM Preventative Maintenance
PMP Preventative Maintenance Program
POTWs Publicly Owned Treatment Works
R&R Rehabilitation and Replacement
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SDS Safety Data Sheets
SERP Spill Emergency Response Plan
SIUs Significant Industrial Users
13 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SPW Safety Plus Web
SPWA South Placer Wastewater Authority
SSMP Sewer System Management Plan
SPILL Sanitary Sewer Overflow
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
UPC Uniform Plumbing Code
USA Underground Service Alert
WDP Waste Discharge Permit
WW Wastewater
WWC Wastewater Collection
WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant
14 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

LIST OF TERMS
Authorized Representative – The person designated, for a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency, as either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official or a duly authorized representative of that person.

Blockage – Something that partially or fully blocks the wastewater from flowing through a sewer pipeline. The blockage can be caused by debris in the sewer, grease buildup, root intrusion, or a partial or complete pipeline collapse. If not caught in time, the blockage may cause an overflow.

California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) - CASA is a non-profit, statewide trade association representing public agencies that provide wastewater collection, treatment, disposal, and/or water reclamation services to about 90 percent of the sewered population in California.

Website: http://www.casaweb.org/
California Water Environment Association (CWEA) – CWEA is an association of 8,000-plus professionals in the wastewater industry. CWEA is committed to keeping California's water clean.

CWEA trains and certifies wastewater professionals, disseminates technical information, and promotes sound policies to benefit society by protecting and enhancing the water environment. CWEA offers services at the state level and locally through 17 local geographical sections. In addition, through their on-line bookstore, CWEA offers technical references for sewer system operation and maintenance.

Website: http://www.cwea.org/ .

Central Valley Clean Water Association (CVCWA) – CVCWA is an association comprised of over 50 wastewater treatment and collection system agencies. CVCWA’s mission is to effectively represent the interests of public wastewater agencies in the Central Valley in regulatory matters and to support the exchange of information so members can best meet their business challenges.

Website: http://www.cvcwa.org/ .

Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board – Also known as Regional Water Board or RWQCB. The mission of this state regulatory agency is to: preserve, enhance, and restore the quality of California's water resources, and ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. Website: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/ .

Dynamic Model – Computer hydraulic model simulation which solves the complete dynamic flow routing equations (St. Venant’s equations) for accurate simulation of backwater, looped connections, surcharging, and pressure flow in a collection system.

Enrollee – The legal public entity that owns a sanitary sewer system, as defined by the GWDR, which has submitted a complete and approved application for coverage under the GWDR. This is also called a sewer system agency or wastewater collection system agency.

Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) - Fats, oils, and grease that are discharged into the sanitary sewer collection system by Food Service Establishments (FSE), homes, apartments, and other sources. FOG is a major cause of blockages leading to increased maintenance and sometimes spills. 15 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
FOG Control Program – To be implemented at the Enrollee’s discretion. May include public education program; plan and schedule for the disposal of FOG; legal authority to prohibit FOG related discharges; requirement to install grease removal devices; authority to inspect grease producing facilities; identification of sanitary sewer system sections subject to FOG blockages and the establishment of a cleaning schedule for each section; development and implementation of source control measures for all sources of FOG.

Geographical Information System (GIS) – A database linked with mapping, which includes various layers of information used by government officials. Examples of information found on a GIS can include a sewer map; sewer features such as pipe location, diameter, material, condition, last date cleaned or repaired. The GIS also typically contains base information such as streets and parcels.

Governing Board – This is the governing board of the sewer entity developing the SSMP. Examples would be the Board of Directors, the City Council, or the County Board of Supervisors.

GWDR – General Waste Discharge Requirements – A GWDR is an authorization to discharge waste with certain conditions, which can be issued on an individual basis or to a group of dischargers. The Statewide General WDR for Sanitary Sewer Systems was adopted by the SWCRB and will be implemented by the Regional Water Boards and SWRCB.

Infiltration – The seepage of groundwater into a sewer system, including service connections. Seepage frequently occurs through defective or cracked pipes, pipe joints, connections or manhole walls and joints.

Inflow – Water discharged into a sewer system and service connections from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellars, yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, around manhole covers or through holes in the covers, cross connections from storm and combined sewer system, catch basins, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters or drainage. Inflow differs from infiltration in that it is a direct discharge into the sewer rather than a leak into the sewer itself.

Lateral – The portion of sewer that connects a home or business with the main line in the street.

Sometimes sewer system agencies own or maintain a portion of the lateral.

Upper Lateral: Portion of lateral from building to property line (or easement line), usually privately owned and maintained.

Lower Lateral: Portion of lateral from property line (or easement line) to sewer mainline in the street or easement. This portion of the lateral is sometimes privately owned and maintained and sometimes publicly owned and maintained.

Monitoring and Reporting Program - The Monitoring and Reporting Program established in the WDR that establishes monitoring, record keeping, reporting and public notification requirements for the GWDR.

Private Lateral: That portion of the Lateral that is owned and maintained by the private property owner that it serves. Based on an individual agency’s ordinance, this may just be the Upper Lateral or can include the Lower Lateral.
16 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Preventative Maintenance (PM) – Regularly scheduled servicing of machinery, infrastructure or other equipment using appropriate tools, tests, and lubricants. This type of maintenance can prolong the useful life of equipment, infrastructure, and machinery and increase its efficiency by detecting and correcting problems before they cause a breakdown of the equipment, or failure of the infrastructure.

R-Value – Is the amount of rainfall that reaches the collection system via infiltration and inflow. This value is typically expressed as a percentage of total rainfall volume that reaches the collection system.

Regional Water Board – Is a short name for any of the nine regional boards including the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Rehabilitation and Replacement Plan (also referred to as a Capital Improvement Plan) – Identifies and prioritizes system deficiencies and implements short-term and long-term rehabilitation actions to address each deficiency.

Sanitary Sewer Systems – Any system of pipes, pump stations, sewer lines, or other conveyances, upstream of a wastewater treatment plant head works used to collect and convey wastewater to the publicly owned treatment facility. Temporary storage and conveyance facilities are part of the sanitary sewer system and discharges into these temporary storage facilities are not to be considered spills.

Satellite Collection System – The portion, if any, of a sanitary sewer system owned or operated by a different public agency than the agency that owns and operates the wastewater treatment facility to which the sanitary sewer system is tributary.

Sewer System Management Plan-SSMP – A series of written site-specific programs that address how a collection system owner/operator conducts their daily business as is outlined in the WDR. Each SSMP is unique for an individual discharger. The plan includes provisions to provide proper and efficient management, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewer systems, while taking into consideration risk management and cost benefit analysis. Also, must contain a spill response plan. Certification is offered by technically qualified and experienced persons and provides a useful cost-effective means for ensuring that SSMPs are developed and implemented appropriately.

Spill – A spill is a discharge of sewage from any portion of a sanitary sewer system due to a sanitary sewer system overflow, operational failure, and/or infrastructure failure. Exfiltration of sewage is not considered to be a spill under this General Order if the exfiltrated sewage remains in the subsurface and does not reach a surface water of the State.

Spill Emergency Response Plan – Identifies measures to protect public health and the environment. A plan must include the following: notification procedure, appropriate response plan, regulatory notification procedures, employee training plan, procedures to address emergency operations, a program that ensures all reasonable steps are taken to contain and prevent discharges.

Spill Categories- Category 1 - any volume of sewage from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that results in a discharge to:
• A surface water, including a surface water body that contains no flow or volume of water. • A drainage conveyance system that discharges to surface waters when the sewage is not fully captured and returned to the sewer system or disposed of properly. 17 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
• Any spill volume not recovered from a drainage conveyance system is considered a discharge to surface water unless the drainage conveyance system discharges to a dedicated stormwater infiltration basin or facility
Category 2 - is a spill of 1,000 gallons or greater from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that does not discharge to a surface water.

Category 3- is a spill of equal to or greater than 50 gallons and less than 1,000 gallons from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that does not discharge to a surface water.

Category 4 - is a spill of less than 50 gallons from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that does not discharge to a surface water.

Stakeholder - A person or organization that has a vested interest in the development and outcome of the SWRCB Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ, Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems.

State Water Resources Control Board: Also called the State Board. This is the State agency that developed and passed the GWDR for collection systems and the agency that maintains the spill reporting web site.

Static Model – A computer hydraulic model that uses the Manning’s Equation to determine hydraulic capacity of the gravity pipelines and either the Manning’s or Hazen-Williams Equations to determine the hydraulic capacity of the pressure pipeline system. The capacity is compared to the peak hydraulic flow in the system to determine potential deficiencies. The static model assumes the peak hydraulic flow occurs at all locations within the collection system at the same time.

Stoppage – Something that partially or fully blocks the wastewater from flowing through a sewer pipeline. A stoppage can be caused by debris in the sewer, grease buildup, root intrusion, or a partial or full collapse of the pipeline. If not caught in time, a stoppage may cause an overflow. This is also called a blockage.

System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan – A required component of an agency’s SSMP and is an important part of any agency’s overall Capital Improvement Plan that provides hydraulic capacity of key sanitary sewer system elements for dry weather peak flow conditions, as well as the appropriate design storm or wet weather event.

Wastewater Collection System: See Sanitary Sewer System. 18 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville (City) is a Council-Manager form of government in which responsibilities are vested in the City Council and City Manager. In this form of government, the City Council’s role is that of a legislative policy-making body which determines not only local laws that regulate community life, but also determines public policy and gives direction to the City Manager. The City Manager administers the affairs of the city government in a business-like prudent manner.

The City’s Public Utilities Commission studies and advises the City Council on all utility issues related to city-owned utilities (electric, water, sewer, and solid waste).

The City’s Wastewater Utility is one of five utilities operated in the Environmental Utilities Department (EUD). The Wastewater Utility is responsible for operation and maintenance of all wastewater facilities owned by the City including the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs), the wastewater collection system, the water quality lab and the recycled water utility.

The City’s Wastewater Collection (WWC) Division is a division of Environmental Utilities Department (EUD). The WWC Division is responsible for management, operation, maintenance, and capacity assurance of the City’s sanitary sewer collection system, including inspecting, cleaning, repairing, and monitoring the gravity sewer lines, force mains, and lift station.

The City initiated a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) assessment in 2005 to evaluate how well the Wastewater Collection (WWC) Division would comply with the anticipated State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) order No. 2006-0003 for Sanitary Sewer Systems. That SSMP assessment indicated that the City was positioned fairly well to comply with the SWRCB’s SSMP requirements.

In March of 2007, the WWC division along with consultant assistance, began writing the SSMP and reviewing all remaining policies, procedures, and programs to comply with the SWRCB’s WDR.

The plan described how the City would address each element of the SSMP contained in the SWRCB’s WDR to eliminate preventable Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs). The WWC staff completed the development of the SSMP, which the City Council approved on 21 JAN 09.

On June 11, 2024, the City successfully completed its latest SSMP Audit, adhering to Attachment 10 of the Reissued Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) State Water Board Order No. 2022-0103- DWQ. The results of the audit demonstrate the City's full compliance with the Reissued WDR and emphasize the effectiveness of several successful work programs that are currently being implemented. This commitment to maintaining high standards underscores the City’s dedication to environmental responsibility and public health
19 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
The city continues to monitor, measure, and modify the existing SSMP as changes and program improvements are identified. The city has developed a Key Performance Indicator worksheet, which is used to monitor and measure the effectiveness of the various elements of the SSMP.

Roseville’s SSMP has been audited six times since being certified by the SWRCB

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
The City’s Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) developed in 2009 as a practical and essential resource, set a strong foundation for effective sewer management. This revised SSMP not only retains vital information from the original document but also integrates valuable insights from recent audits and best practices, ensuring the city takes its efforts to the next level. It is designed to address the specific size, scale, and complexity of the City’s sanitary sewer system, fully complying with the requirements stated in the Reissued WDR, particularly in Specifications 5.2 and Attachment D.

CITY HISTORICAL SPILL PERFORMANCE
The statistical records from the City’s Wastewater Collection Division (WWC) reveal that, prior to implementation of the SSMP, the City faced a moderate rate of sewer spills compared to similarly sized agencies in California. However as demonstrated in Table 1, since adopting the SSMP, the City’s spill performance metrics have consistently outperformed State and Regional averages in both number and volume associated with spills. This consistent improvement highlights the City’s commitment to effective wastewater management. Additionally, when spills do occur, they are swiftly addressed, ensuring that public health and the environment remain protected from any adverse effects.

Figure 1-System Spill
Summary
20 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
0 S S M P O ve r vie w
The City of Roseville (City) is required to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ adopted December 6, 2022, entitled Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems (General Order).

In response to this General Order, the City has thoroughly revised its previous SSMP to align with the requirements outlined in the Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) for Sanitary Sewer Systems. The SSMP serves as a "living document," showcasing the City’s ongoing management activities, procedures, and decision-making processes for operating and maintaining the system.

The City developed an SSMP specific to the wastewater collection system operated and maintained by wastewater collection personnel in the City of Roseville. This SSMP documents the activities the city will utilize to manage, operate, and maintain its wastewater collection system. The city shall take all steps feasible to eliminate spill, but in the event an spill does occur, will take all steps necessary to contain and mitigate the negative impacts of an spill 21 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S M P E L E M E N T 1
1 G oa l s a nd I ntr o d u c ti o n
Att. D-1 The goal of the SSMP is to provide a plan and schedule to properly manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the City’s sanitary sewer system, reduce and prevent spills and contain and mitigate spills that do occur. The plan must include a narrative Introduction section that discusses the following items: (1) A general description of the Enrollee’s SSMP, and discuss plan implementation and updates, (2) A schedule for updating the SSMP and scheduling internal audits. The schedule must include milestones for incorporating activities addressing spill prevention, and (3) A description of the Enrollee owned assets and service area.

1.1 SSMP Goals
The City’s WWC Division has established eight goals to guide the implementation, and success of Roseville’s SSMP. These goals are designed to facilitate and target the management, operation, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer collection system in a manner that will sustain the infrastructure, protect public health and the environment, and achieve compliance with State Water Resources Control Board’s WDR for Sanitary Sewer Systems. These goals include:

1. Properly manage, operate, and maintain all portions of the City’s wastewater collection system.

2. Provide adequate capacity to convey peak wastewater flows.

3. No repeat overflows from the same location.

4. Maintain a rate of Spills/100 miles of pipe, that is lower than the state and regional average.

5. Maintain a recovery rate for Spills/100 miles of pipe, that is higher than the state and regional average.

6. Mitigate the impacts that are associated with any Spills that may occur.

7. Comply with all applicable regulatory notification and reporting requirements.

8. Maintain high design and construction standards for new and rehabilitated infrastructure.

To achieve the goals outlined in the City’s SSMP, the City is committed to implementing various programs that address issues related to its wastewater system. The City takes pride in maintaining strict design and construction standards, along with a robust operations and maintenance program. This program includes chemical root control, closed circuit television (CCTV) inspections, and skilled construction crews capable of performing both simple and complex repairs to the system.

The City emphasizes proactive maintenance and inspection and is well-equipped to handle the challenges of operating its wastewater collection system while ensuring the highest standards of service delivery.
22 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Although the City is proactive in preventing spills, it has also established an effective Spill Emergency Response Plan to respond quickly if a spill occurs. The City will take all necessary actions to contain the spill and mitigate its negative impacts. Additionally, the City utilizes Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the effectiveness of its spill management efforts.

1.2 SSMP Plan Update
The City of Roseville completed a comprehensive SSMP audit conducted by Fischer Compliance on June 11, 2024. This audit confirmed that the City's long-standing SSMP has been effective in meeting the required elements through its various programs and the adoption of new technology.

Since most sewer spills originate from lower laterals, the City invested in a lateral lining trailer and set an annual KPI target for lateral lining to address issues identified during CCTV inspections.

The City consistently increases its KPI goals and has achieved significant milestones in cleaning, televising, responding to service requests, and making main and lateral repairs. These efforts demonstrate its commitment to proactive infrastructure management and reducing spills from the sewer system.

Additionally, the City has utilized the look-up tool on the CIWQS website to identify the date of the next scheduled audit and the subsequent update of its SSMP, as shown in Table 1.

1.3 Sewer System Asset Overview
Figure – 2 outlines the City of Roseville’s geographical service area. The information provided in this SSMP was gathered from the City’s Economic Development website located here: City of Roseville Demographics
Table 1 – SSMP Update Schedule
23 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
The city’s service area covers approximately 44.20 square miles and includes 54,622 residential connections, 1,932 commercial connections, and 600 industrial connections, as well as two regional wastewater treatment plants. The Wastewater Collection Division serves approximately 166,000 sewer customers. The wastewater collection and conveyance system is comprised of 885 miles of sewer pipe, with diameters ranging from 4 inches to 84 inches. It includes 12,538 manholes and 17 neighborhood lift stations, which together convey an average dry weather flow of about 18.5 million gallons per day (MGD). Sanitary sewage is transported from the City’s eastern boundaries to the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and from its northern and western boundaries to the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant.

1.4 Updated Sewer System Map
The WWC Division maintains an up-to-date electronic map of the wastewater collection system as required by Att. D-1.3 of the Re-issued Order. The City uses ESRI GIS software to map all utilityrelated data. The GIS map platform, referred to as Roseville GeoViewer, shows all gravity main segments with the direction of flow, manhole information, pumping facilities, pressure pipes, and valves. In addition, the GeoViewer allows users to turn on/off different layers and base maps to display the information they need.

Figure 2 – City of Roseville Service Area
24 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

T H I S P A G E L E F T I N T E N T I O N A L L Y B L A N K 25 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S M P E L E M E N T 2
2 O r ga niza ti o n
Att. D-2 The Plan must identify organizational staffing responsible and integral for implementing the local SSMP through an Organizational chart or similar document that includes, the name of the Legally Responsible official as required in section 5.1;The position, titles, telephone numbers and email addresses for management, administrative and maintenance positions responsible for implementing specific SSMP elements; Organizational lines of authority; and Chain of communication for reporting spills from receipt of complaint or other information, including the person responsible for reporting spills to the State and Regional Water Boards and other agencies as applicable.
2 . 1 L e g al l y R e spo nsi bl e O f f i cia l ( L RO ) The City of Roseville has identified the Wastewater Utility Manager and the Wastewater Collection Superintendent as the LRO’s or authorized representatives for the wastewater collection division.

Historically, the Wastewater Collection Superintendent is responsible for the certification of spill reports involving Roseville’s wastewater collection system. 2 . 2 S S M P R e spo nsi b il i ty C ha r t
The City of Roseville operates under a Council-Manager form of government, where responsibilities are shared between the City Council and the City Manager. The City Council serves as the legislative and policy-making body, establishing local laws, shaping public policy, and providing guidance to the City Manager. The City Manager oversees the administration of city operations in a professional and efficient manner, delegating authority to each Environmental Utilities (EU) management group to ensure the effective operation of their respective utilities. The following chart provides a detailed overview of position descriptions and responsibilities related to SSMP implementation.

SSMP Element Responsible Position
I. Goals
Responsibility for the divisions goals resides with the WWC Superintendent, Mr. Dan Pruden. However, goals for the
wastewater collection division are developed through collaboration between the WWC Superintendent, the WWC Supervisor and field crews. Mr. Pruden can be reached at (916)746-1891
II. Organization
The Environmental Utilities (EU) Director, Mr. Sean Bigley, recommends any updates to the City Manager for organizational structure within the Wastewater Collection Division. Mr. Bigley can be reached at (916)774-5770.
26 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
III. Legal Authority
The City Manager, City Attorney and Roseville City Council ultimately uphold city ordinances within the Roseville Municipal Code.

IV. Operations &
Maintenance
The Wastewater Collection Superintendent has overall
responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the collection system. The Asst. EU Director, (TBD), oversees, recommends, and administers the O&M budget. EU Engineering provides support through the GIS Division for up-to-date mapping of the system.

V. Design and
Construction
Standards
The Development Services Division and EU Engineering collaborate to identify and maintain the design and construction standards.

Development Services Division manages the inspection of all new development, CIP and infill projects to ensure all standards are met.

All projects receive EU Director approval related to Utility work.

VI. Spill
Emergency
Response Plan
The Wastewater Collection Superintendent and Supervisors Mr.

Shane Rodgers, Mr. Kevin Ryan and Mr. Cody Wilbanks, maintain the spill emergency response plan. The plan is implemented as an annual training, where revisions to the plan may be made based on field crew feedback. Mr. Rodgers can be reached at (916)746-1894, Mr. Ryan at (916)746-1893 and Mr. Wilbanks at (916)746-1889 VII. FOG Control
Program
The Wastewater Collection Superintendent and Supervisor identify hot spots from Food Service Establishments (FSE) and maintain an effective cleaning PM schedule to eliminate spills. The FOG Control Program including permitting of FSEs, inspection of facilities and monitoring pump out records is administered by the Wastewater Collection Superintendent.

VIII. System
Evaluation and
Capacity
Assurance Plan
EU Engineering Principal Engineer, Mr. Arashdeep Singh, administers the SECAP program to ensure the hydraulic model is up to date, and to assure capacity for current and future development. Mr. Singh can be reached at (916)746-1854
IX. Monitoring,
Measurement
and Program
Modifications
The Wastewater Collection Superintendent with assistance from the Wastewater Collection Supervisors monitors the implementation and assesses the success of the overall SSMP elements. The superintendent tracks Key Performance Indicators and adjusts programs as needed.
27 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

2.3 Organizational Lines of Authority
The Wastewater Collection Division is one of five utilities operated in the Environmental Utilities Department (EUD). The Environmental Utilities Department has defined its lines of authority in the attached Figure 3.

Figure 3 – EUD Wastewater Utility
X. SSMP Audits
The Asst EU Director is responsible for SSMP program audits, with assistance from the Wastewater Collection Superintendent and Principal Engineer for Wastewater Division
XI. Communication
Plan
The EU Public Information Officer, Mr. Maurice Chaney,
communicates with the EU Director, City Manager, City Council, nearby agencies, and the public on the City’s SSMP monitoring and modifications. Mr. Chaney can be reached at (916)774-5539. 28 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

2.4 Chain of Communication Reporting Chart
Office hours for the WWC Division are Monday through Friday from 0630 to 1600, except for holidays. The Administration Technician or service call worker receives all service calls during regular business hours. If received in the office, a service request is created with the caller information, the problem, and contact information. This information is transferred to the service call worker, in which they respond, access the problem, and provide a solution. An answering service, contracted by WWC Division, receives all after-hours calls to gather information and dispatch to the on-call service worker via an assigned mobile phone. The on-call service worker is available 24 hours per day and is furnished with a service van and equipment to facilitate a timely response. A response time goal is 20 minutes during business hours and 40 minutes for after-hour service calls. The van is equipped with containment devices to manage lower lateral blockages and spills, and to prevent spills from entering a storm drain inlet or channel. Should the situation require additional resources, the on-call worker would contact crew members from the call-out sheet for assistance.

Figure 4, included in the division’s SERP, summarizes the chain of communication when receiving calls for service.

Figure 4 – Spill Chain of Communication
29 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

T H I S P A G E L E F T I N T E N T I O N A L L Y B L A N K 30 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S M P E L E M E N T 3
3 L e g al Au tho ri ty
Att. D-3 The plan must include copies or an electronic link to the Enrollee’s current sewer system use ordinances, service agreements and/or other legally binding procedures to demonstrate the Enrollee possesses the necessary legal authority to: (1).Prevent illicit discharges into its sanitary sewer system from inflow and infiltration (I&I); unauthorized stormwater; chemical dumping; unauthorized debris; roots; fats, oils, and grease; and trash, including rags and other debris that may cause blockages; (2). Collaborate with storm sewer agencies to coordinate emergency spill responses, ensure access to storm sewer systems during spill events, and prevent unintentional cross-connections of sanitary sewer infrastructure to storm sewer infrastructure; (3). Require that sewer system components and connections be properly designed and constructed; (4).Ensure access for maintenance, inspection, and/or repairs for portions of the service lateral owned and/or operated by the Enrollee; (5). Enforce any violation of its sewer ordinances, service agreements, or other legally binding procedures; and (6). Obtain easement accessibility agreements for locations requiring sewer system operations and maintenance, as applicable.

The Roseville Municipal Code (RMC) found here, Roseville Municipal Code, provides specific legal authority for the WWC division to operate and manage the wastewater collection system. The City’s current legal authority is established through existing codes, regulations, ordinances, and permitting procedures that allows the City to require and enforce various measures for ensuring the proper and efficient operation, management, and maintenance of the City’s wastewater collection system. Table 2 indicates the code section for the legal authority required.

Table 2 – RMC Codes for Legal Authority
Legal Authority RMC Number Description
Ability to prevent illicit discharges into the
wastewater system

14.20.040 Definition of illicit discharge

14.26.010 Purpose and policy of industrial
wastewater
Ability to require all sewers and
connections are properly designed and
constructed

14.12.040 Building and sewer connection
requirements

14.14.030 FOG discharge permit required

14.14.070 Prohibitions for FSE construction
Ensure proper access to portions of the
lateral owned by the city
Charter Article X
Sec 10.01 General powers respecting utilities

14.14.290 Right of entry
Ability to limit the discharge of FOG 14.12.050 Use of public sewers

14.14.010 Purpose

14.14.030 FOG discharge permit required

14.14.040 Fog discharge limitation
31 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

14.14.070 Prohibitions

14.14.120 Interceptor maintenance requirements
Ability to enforce all sewer ordinances 14.12.060 Sewer use- enforcement authority

14.14.330 FOG – determination of non-compliance

14.14.350 FOG- Permit suspension or revocation

14.14.360 FOG- penalties and violations
32 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
3 . 1 I nd u str i al Pre tr ea tme nt Pro g ra m
In addition to the RMC, the City of Roseville Industrial Waste Division (IWD) oversees and administers the Pretreatment Program Enforcement Response Plan (ERP). This plan outlines operational procedures intended to ensure that the Significant Industrial Users (SIUs), and the small Commercial/Industrial dischargers to the sanitary sewer system are appropriately permitted and monitored. To assure compliance by these dischargers, the IWD implements enforcement procedures specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with 40CFR 403.5 (f) (5). The ERP specifies criteria by which IWD personnel determine the enforcement action most appropriate to the nature of the violation. The Pretreatment Enforcement Response Plan is attached to the SSMP as Appendix 3-1.
3 . 2 D e si g n a nd Co nstr u c tio n Sta nd a r d s
The City of Roseville’s design and construction standards regulate and guide the design and preparation of plans and construction of the City of Roseville’s sanitary sewer systems and related public improvements, and set guidelines for all private works, which involve related improvements. The City’s Design and Construction standards are located on their website at:

Roseville Design and Construction Standards
3 . 3 S e w er Ac c e ss Au tho r i ty
The RMC section 10.01 states the City shall possess all powers granted to cities by state law to construct, condemn, purchase, acquire, add to, maintain, and operate, either within or outside its corporate limits, including, but not by way of limitation, public utilities for supplying water, light, heat, power, gas, transportation, sewage and refuse collections, treatment and disposal services, or any of them, to the municipality and the inhabitants thereof; Each city-owned utility shall be financially self-sufficient, and shall fully compensate the city general fund for all goods, services, real property and rights to use or operate on or in city-owned real property. 3 . 4 F a ts Oi l s a nd G re a se
The City of Roseville limits the discharge of Fats, Oils and Grease from Food Service Establishments through Section 14.14 of the RMC. Section 14.14 was adopted to facilitate the maximum beneficial use of the city’s sewer services and facilities while preventing blockages of the sewer lines resulting from discharges of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) into the public sewer, and to specify appropriate FOG discharge requirements for food service establishments (FSEs). Section

14.14 establishes conditions for permitting, inspection, pumping and recordkeeping, and right of entry for inspection. The City’s FOG ordinance is located at FOG Ordinance 33 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

3.5 Regulation of Sewer Use – Enforcement
Sections 14.12.060 and 14.14.360 (FOG Ordinance) of the RMC prescribes the enforcement actions available to the city when violations of the code are discovered. Violation of the RMC may be charged as either an infraction or misdemeanor upon discretion of the City Attorney.

3.6 Inter-Agency and Satellite Agreements
The City of Roseville operates two Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities where sewer from satellite systems flow into City wastewater mains. As such, the Environmental Utilities Department maintains the following agreements to address regional and satellite systems.

3.6.1 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement South Placer Wastewater Authority The purpose for this agreement is to provide for planning, acquisition, financing, ownership, construction, and operation of Regional Wastewater Facilities. The participants in the SPWA create a public entity which is separate from the City, the District, and the County. The SPWA services the areas the City of Roseville, Placer County and South Placer Municipal Utility District. The agreement is attached to the SSMP as Appendix 3-2.

3.6.2 South Placer Wastewater Facilities Operation and Use Agreement The agreement known as the Joint Powers Agreement, supersedes all other previous agreements.

The new agreement indicates the City of Roseville shall operate and maintain Regional Wastewater Facilities for the mutual benefit of and provide wastewater treatment services to the areas depicted on Exhibit A, areas which are within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City, District and County, so long as the District and County pay the City their proportionate shares.

This agreement is attached to the SSMP as Appendix 3-3

3.6.3 Contract and Operating Agreement between SRCSD and SASD This agreement between the City of Roseville, Sacramento Area Sewer District and Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District defines points where flows enter and exit each other’s area of service and points of demarcation for City and County assets. In addition, the agreement is to meet regulatory requirements and provide a basis for SASD, SRCSD and the City of Roseville to work together to provide service to users, establish operation and maintenance responsibilities and outline rates and fees. This agreement is attached to the SSMP as Appendix 3-4

3.7 Legal Authority Documents
Refer to Appendices 3-1 through 3-4 for Legal Authority Documents:

Appendix 3-1 Pretreatment Program Enforcement Response Plan – TOC Appendix 3-2 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Placer Wastewater Authority Appendix 3-3 Agreement Regarding the Operation and Use of the South Placer Regional WW Facilities
Appendix 3-4 Wastewater Service Agreement by Contract & Operating Agreement Between SASD, SRCSD and City of Roseville.
34 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

T H I S P A G E L E F T I N T E N T I O N A L L Y B L A N K 35 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S M P E L E M E N T 4
4 O p er a ti o n a nd M a i nte na nce
Att. D - 4 The plan must include the items listed below that are appropriate and applicable to the Enrollee’s system.(1). An up to date map(s) of the sanitary sewer system, and procedures for maintaining and providing State and regional Board staff access to the maps. The maps must show gravity line segments and manholes, pumping facilities, pressure pipes and valves, and applicable stormwater conveyance facilities within the sewer system service area boundaries. (2). A scheduling system and data collection system for preventative operation and maintenance activities conducted by staff and contractors. The scheduling system must include: Inspection and maintenance activities; Higher frequency inspections and maintenance of known problem areas, including areas with tree root problems; Regular visual and closed circuit television (CCTV) inspections of manholes and sewer pipes. The data collection system must document data from system inspection and maintenance activities, including system areas/components prone to root intrusion potentially resulting in system backup and/or failure. (3). In house and external training provided on a regular basis for sanitary sewer system operations and maintenance staff and contractors. The training must cover: The requirements of this order; The enrollee’s Spill Emergency Response Plan procedures and practice drills; Skilled estimation of spill volume for field operators; and Electronic CIWQS reporting procedures for staff submitting data. (4). An inventory of sewer system equipment, including the identification of critical replacement and spare parts.

The Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Program is essential to fulfill the city’s duty to serve the residents and businesses of the City of Roseville. It is also the most significant part of the city’s effort to eliminate the occurrence of SSOs and stay compliant with the general order.

The city’s O&M program is comprised of these elements:

1. Collection System Mapping

2. Preventive Maintenance

3. Rehabilitation and Replacement

4. Staff Training and Certification

5. Equipment And Replacement Parts Inventories, Including Critical Replacement Parts

4.1 Collection System Maps and Information
The WWC Division maintains an up-to-date electronic map of the wastewater collection system as required by Section D.13(iv)(a) of the Order. The City uses ESRI GIS software to map all utilityrelated data. The GIS map platform, referred to as Roseville GeoViewer, shows all gravity main segments with the direction of flow, manhole information, pumping facilities, pressure pipes, and valves. In addition, the GeoViewer allows users to turn on/off different layers and base maps to display the information they need. Additional map layers available in GeoViewer include:
• Hot Spot Locations
• CIPP Lined Mainline Segments
• Food Service Establishments and Grease Removal Devices • Waterways
• Roadways
36 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
• City Boundaries
• Stormwater System
Figure 5 shows the GIS map system, and how it incorporates each of the sewer shed basins within the City of Roseville’s jurisdictional boundaries.

4.1.1 Map Update Policy
This policy aims to provide uniformity in identifying, verifying, documenting, and tracking the changes to the sewer mapping system. In addition, this document will describe the process in which the mapping system shall be updated.

A significant effort is placed upon maintaining a very complete, accurate, and up-to-date wastewater collection map which is an essential component for the proper operation and maintenance of a wastewater collection system. Maps are updated as new sub-divisions are accepted or when field crews repair, rehabilitate or replace components of the system that require updating the maps. A mapping update policy has been developed to address procedures that ensure mapping updates or revisions are correct and completed in GIS.

Figure 5 – Wastewater Grid Map
37 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
CCTV crews identify discrepancies between existing system maps and real time field data. The operator shall note the discrepancies and submit changes to the WWC Supervisor when differences are identified.

Construction and Maintenance crews identify any new infrastructure added to the system.

Information required for CMMS Map Change will be directed to the WWC Supervisor. The information required for Mains, Laterals, and SMH’s are:
• Mains - Grid map area, the distance between SMH’s and pipe size, pipe material • Laterals –Grid map area, C/O location, length, depth, pipe size, material, and depth. • SMH – Grid map area, depth, barrel diameter, access cover size and material, number of and pipe size of inlets and outlets, barrel lining/coating, drops Y/N.

The Supervisor will create a work order in Maximo listing the Classification as “Map Change.” Then select “Log” and “Add Row” to add a description of the asset that needs to be added/changed. In the Log section of the work order, the Supervisor will list all the details gathered from the field and attach a map if required. Do not change the status of the work order in Maximo CMMS.

The GIS group automatically receives all map change requests. Once all map changes are updated, the Supervisor will receive an email informing them of the completed work order, at which time the GIS group closes the work order.

4.2 Operation and Maintenance
The WWC Division’s O&M program focuses on eliminating sewer backups and overflows, increasing the lifespan of the infrastructure, and bringing uninterrupted service to the residents of Roseville. WWC division provides service to 146,875 customers. Within the 43.05 square miles of Roseville, the City inspects and maintains 17 lift stations, approximately 578 miles of sewer mains ranging from 6- to 84- inch diameter, and 293 miles of lower laterals. Table 3 below represents a few performance indicators the WWC division tracks and measures their performance against.

Table 3 – Operation and Maintenance Activities
FY
17-18
FY
18-19
FY
19-20
FY
20-21
FY
21-22
FY
22-23
FY
23-24
Total Miles of Pipe Cleaned 283.12 226.1 235.9 296.14 288.73 301.36 295.57 Total Miles of Pipe CCTV
Inspected 64.1 119.9 94.65 94.65 50.05 51.59 53.53
Number of SSOs Caused by
Hot Spots 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Miles of Pipe Rehabilitated or
Repaired 1.49 .5 .54 3.4 3.83 .29 4.43
Total Number of Spills Main
and Lateral 25 31 32 51 32 30 27
38 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.2.1 Preventative Maintenance Program
The WWC Division of the Environmental Utilities Department is responsible for the City's sewer system and implements preventative and corrective maintenance approaches to operate and maintain the system efficiently. The division's PM program involves cleaning sewers on a recurring schedule, including regular CCTV inspection to determine the efficiency of those PM activities. The GIS system divides the city into grids, enabling targeted PM scheduling for an individual grid based on history, CCTV inspection, and infrastructure's age. The WWC division schedules cleaning as often as every three months or up to ten years, with the age and condition of the pipe being key factors. The scheduled maintenance projects that are identified in Maximo are included in Appendix 4-1.

Corrective maintenance projects and work orders are a concerted effort utilizing the PM and CCTV inspection programs. Information gathered during routine cleaning, repair work and inspection, generates the development of repair and replacement work orders. The following paragraphs describe the City's current operation and maintenance procedures for maintaining the wastewater collection system.

4.2.1.1 PM Cleaning Program
The WWC Division is equipped with three combination sewer cleaners to keep the sewer system operating efficiently and minimize line stoppages and calls for service. Sewer cleaning using hydraulic or mechanical methods performed on a routine basis helps remove accumulated debris in the pipe such as sand, silt, grease, roots, and rocks. Scheduled maintenance projects have been developed for each map grid based on historical data and field crew input.

4.2.1.2 Hot Spot Cleaning
In addition to scheduled maintenance, the WWC division aggressively cleans identified problem areas, known as hot spots. This list of hot spots has been compiled based on historical data, field crew observations, and CCTV condition assessments. These mainline segments tend to have more frequent backups due to sluggish flows, poor grade, and sags, The frequency of Hot Spot cleaning ranges from 1-6 months, depending on history and CCTV inspection data. The WWC division strives to reduce and eliminate these hot spot areas during CIP projects or rehabilitation projects performed by City crews. Currently, the WWC division has 276 segments identified as Hot Spots.

4.2.1.3 Electroscan Inspection
To identify and quantify locations of I&I entering the sewer system, the WWC division invested in Electroscan Technology, adding the equipment to a newer CCTV inspection truck. Using Electroscan, a probe is pulled through the mainline, and electricity is measured and used to identify any defect where the pipe may leak. This enables crews to pinpoint CCTV inspection of the pipe section before scheduling repair work to correct the deficiency. Electroscan has also proved valuable as a QA/QC tool for accepting Cured-In Place-Pipe rehabilitation projects. The city performed pre-post Electroscan inspections on sewer mains rehabilitated with CIPP technology. This pilot study proved the effectiveness of the Electroscan Technology in locating defects CCTV inspection didn’t identify.
39 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.2.1.4 CCTV Inspection Program
The WWC Division operates three CCTV vans to inspect the wastewater collection system. CCTV operators utilize NASSCO’s PACP coding format when inspecting sewer mains and laterals. All observations are coded and captured in the Granite Net Software system and are archived in a database for access. CCTV inspection crews also perform continual condition assessment inspections on existing infrastructure. For example, CCTV crews inspect mainline segments and lower laterals, looking for deficiencies to minimize problems within the collection system. In addition, sewer inspections identify unwanted connections and sources of I&I into the wastewater system. Finally, CCTV crews inspect new subdivisions or commercial projects before being accepted into the city and the time of warranty acceptance. These inspections are crucial to receiving infrastructure installed to City design and construction standards. Figure 6 includes a sample CCTV report from GraniteNet inspection software. .

Figure 6 – CCTV Inspection
Report
40 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.2.1.5 Root Control Program
The WWC Division has an effective chemical root control program, using Vaporooter products to limit or eliminate root growth in the City-owned portion of the lower lateral. In addition, the WWC division has two qualified applicators licenses (QAL) that allow the division to chemically treat laterals for a more effective root control program rather than contracting out for this service.

This program has dramatically reduced the division's exposure to back injuries resulting from loading and unloading a gas-powered eel from the truck each time. It also lessens the element of crush injuries and trip and fall hazards from eel rods across the ground. In addition, chemical root control has successfully reduced the maintenance time per lateral, which is evident in the reduction of lower lateral backups and overflows.

4.2.1.6 Lift Station Inspection and Maintenance
The city currently has 17 neighborhood lift stations throughout its service area. All 17 stations are equipped with a duplex or triplex pumping system, with the lead/lag pump cycled based on pumping hours. Power outages happen very infrequently. However, all new lift stations and four of the currently active seventeen lift stations are equipped with a 4-hour emergency overflow storage basin. WWC crews inspect the stations monthly, cycle pumps through a pull-down sequence, test floats for operation, and record the condition and any deficiencies at the station. In addition, all Lift Stations are equipped with a SCADA system, which the WWTP operators monitor 24 hours per day. Besides inspections, City crews perform wet-well cleaning and de-ragging of pumps every six months to eliminate pump failures and potential odor complaints.

4.2.1.7 Easement Maintenance Program
To enhance access to hard-to-reach areas while permanent easement access solutions are developed, the City has acquired a sewer easement machine, which extends the capabilities of its current hydro-vac equipment. Additionally, the City owns and operates essential equipment, including a flail mower and box scraper attachments for its skip loader, to support easement maintenance. Once fully developed, the Easement Maintenance Program will include scheduled inspections and maintenance, vegetation management, including the use of chemical weed control to ensure unobstructed access and debris removal to ensure clear paths for crews and equipment.

Regular inspections will help identify issues such as encroachments, erosion, or obstructions that could impact sewer lines or manholes, while vegetation management will focus on trimming or removing trees and plants that may damage infrastructure or hinder maintenance activities.

4.2.2 Corrective Maintenance Program
WWC construction crews perform all repair work to the existing infrastructure. Work orders and projects are developed from information found during maintenance activities, inspections based on calls for service and condition assessment inspection findings. The Corrective Maintenance programs are defined below.
41 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.2.3 Infrastructure Repair
The WWC Division performs routine, emergency, and complex repairs, and replacements to its existing infrastructure. This work includes sewer main installation and repair, sewer manhole installation, and lateral repair and replacements. As a result, city crews have undertaken large projects, installing new mainline segments that have eliminated hot spots, replaced aging infrastructure, and upsized mains to provide additional system capacity. In addition, the WWC Construction crew has performed contractor caliber work at the City’s Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant at significant cost savings for the city.

4.2.3.1 Infill Projects
Depending on their schedule and workload, the WWC division construction crew holds the first choice for any proposed connection to existing infrastructure. If city crews are busy, contractors will be allowed to perform the work under the direction of a city inspector. However, if city crews complete the work, the contractor will schedule the work through the WWC Supervisor. City crews will complete the work on a time and material basis for the contractor.

4.2.3.2 CIPP Lateral Lining
The vast majority of the city’s spills have occurred in the lower lateral, caused by breaks in the VCP and root intrusion. As a result, the city invested in the trenchless technology Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP), purchasing an LMK lateral lining trailer. Lateral lining through an existing cleanout makes it possible to repair and reinstate the pipe integrity without disturbing landscape, sidewalks, roadways and with minimal disruption of service to the resident. CIPP essentially creates a pipe
within a pipe and eliminates further root intrusion and sewer overflows. During condition assessment, lower laterals are CCTV inspected, and work orders are created for those identified as viable for CIPP lining. These work orders are then prioritized based on history and the number of calls for service.

4.2.3.3 Cleanout Installation Program
The WWC Division invests many resources in preventing backups that potentially become spills.

Since the City owns the lower portion of the lateral, access to the lateral through a cleanout is imperative in assessing its condition. The WWC Division has identified homes and businesses without a city cleanout and developed projects to install cleanouts at each service location. One installed, the lower lateral is inspected and if necessary, additional work orders for maintenance or repair are created. Currently, the city installs over 100 cleanouts per year on this project. 42 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.2.3.4 Wet Weather Protocol
The City of Roseville Wastewater Division has prepared the sewer infrastructure in off-site areas and creek crossings to withstand flooding during severe rain events. The division has identified and grouped all sewer manholes along creeks into an Off-Site Sewer Manhole Inspection project.

All manholes within the project have concrete collars poured to deflect any floating debris should creek levels leave their banks. In addition, wastewater crews have secured the manholes with either bolt-down covers or drilled and bolted tabs to ensure the covers from moving. Additionally, the division has installed all creek crossings per the City standard detail SS-9, installed on 8” Ibeams driven a minimum of 30’ into bedrock. Ductile iron pipe crossings are then attached with ½” x 3” wide straps welded to ½” thick plate.

Due to the extensive preparation of the system, the wastewater division is confident during a significant rain event, the system will be undamaged. However, after creek levels recede, the wastewater division visually inspects all infrastructure to ensure no damage has occurred. If Wastewater crews identify any areas of concern, repairs are made quickly (Given a higher priority) to prepare for future rain and flooding events.

Before every significant rain event, the management staff identifies any areas of concern within the system and will establish a schedule for additional inspection should the need arise. In an emergency, equipment and personnel are readily available to assist the on-call service worker should the need arise.

4.2.3.5 Rehabilitation and Replacement
Over the past fifteen years, experience has shown that identifying and prioritizing areas and sewer segments for assessment and rehabilitation is complex. It requires the availability of tremendous amounts of data, expertise in applying PACP coding, and professional judgment. During this time, the WWC Division has significantly advanced its knowledge of the collection system and its sewer assessment and rehabilitation approach. The City has recognized that CCTV inspection is the best method for identifying and prioritizing problematic areas. As such, the City continuously inspects pipelines and utilizes NASSCO’s PACP coding standard to develop a list of assets that need rehabilitation. When defects are identified, the City evaluates the risk of failure and assigns a priority ranking to each asset.

Prioritizing those assets relies on several factors, including:
• Severity and extent of the defects (PACP Score).
• Maintenance records and SSO occurrences.
• Hydraulic capacity needs and projection.
• The estimated remaining useful life of the infrastructure.

This detail-oriented condition assessment approach enables the division to plan and design CIP projects to rehabilitate sewer infrastructure in a planned and organized manner. The supervisor will review the maintenance history of the main, any spill history and determine if the segment should be rehabilitated or continue established preventative maintenance. The main will be added an asset group already created in Maximo CMMS if conditions warrant rehabilitation. Based on current condition, history of calls, and field crew observations, the assets are then prioritized for rehabilitation.
43 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Once the asset group is established, the WWC Superintendent will meet with EU Engineering to review the data and create a CIP project for the upcoming fiscal year, based on priorities and estimated cost. This process ensures the projects will be completed timely, reducing the potential occurrence of an SSO.

4.3 Training and Certification
One challenge when defining a training program is an influx of new employees. Entry-level employees with no training are a potential safety liability in the wastewater field. Training for new hires is predominantly on-the-job training, with classroom and online training finishing the remaining required training. As soon as available, new employees are scheduled for Confined Space Entry, Traffic Control &Flagging, and Excavation and Trench Shoring training, the division’s most significant safety liabilities.

4.3.1 New Hires
On their first day, a new employee will be issued a task booklet, which defines the necessary skills and training for their position. The new hire and Supervisor will go through the book, discuss how the employee will receive training, and receive sign-off on the tasks. The booklet covers all areas involving the wastewater collection system and is an aid in developing qualified, knowledgeable, and capable employees. When the employee becomes proficient in a task, the SR Utility Maintenance Worker or the crew leader signs and dates the book, verifying they have observed the employee satisfactorily complete the task. The training defined in the task booklet is provided through various methods, mainly on-the-job training, and begins the first day on the job. Finally, at the end of the probationary period, new hires are put through a series of activities to demonstrate their proficiency in all skills learned.

4.3.2 Training and Tracking
Safety training constitutes a significant portion of the training received each year and tracking individual completion of training can be insurmountable. The WWC Division utilizes a computerbased software, Safety Plus Web (SPW), to monitor and track each employee’s level of completion.

Supervisors can query individual employee training records or the entire division, to see which courses need completion. In addition, SPW provides Competency-Based Training (CBT), requiring employees to pass a test at the end of each presentation, demonstrating their understanding of the training material.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) have been developed for all equipment and procedures within the division to train new employees and provide a refresher for veteran employees. These SOPs are reviewed annually during a safety meeting and revised should there be a process change.

Therefore, SOP development and training is an ongoing process.

The WWC division holds weekly safety meetings where supervisors or subject matter experts present safety topics specific to the wastewater collection field. These meetings are interactive with the crews and presenters and are great learning opportunities. In addition, the training course is added to SPW, allowing employees to fulfill the training online if they are absent. 44 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Finally, as new training requirements are developed, they are implemented into SPW to ensure all employees receive the required training throughout the year. Table 4 lists the required training specific for the WWC division.

Table 4 – Wastewater Collection Required Training
Training Title Frequency Delivery
Asbestos Cement Pipe Training Initial and Refresher Initial – 1X Refresher – Annual Outside Trainer
Back Safety Annual CBT or Tailgate
Backhoe Operator Certification Refresher – 3 Yrs. CBT, Classroom, Hands-On
Bloodborne Pathogens Training Annual CBT, Classroom
Confined Space Entry-Permit Required Annual
Outside Trainer
CBT, Classroom,
Hands-On
Crystalline Silica Standard Annual CBT, Classroom
Defensive Driving Annual CBT, Classroom
Dry Creek Emergency Action Plan Annual CBT, Classroom
Excavation, Trenching and Shoring Initial
Refresher – Annual
Outside TrainerInitial, CBT,
Classroom
Fall Protection Plan Initial and Refresher Initial – 1X Refresher – 3 Yrs. CBT, Classroom
Fire Extinguisher Training Initial – 1X
Refresher- Annual CBT, Classroom
First Aid, AED and CPR Training Initial
Renewal -Annual
Outside Trainer,
Classroom
Gas Detector Training Annual Outside Trainer,
CBT, Classroom
Hazard Communication Initial
Annual Refresher CBT, Classroom
Hearing Conservation Annual CBT, Classroom
Heat Illness Prevention Annual CBT, Classroom
Injury and Illness Prevention Plan Annual CBT, Classroom Lock Out Tag Out Initial CBT, Classroom
Personal Protective Equipment Initial CBT, Classroom
Respiratory Protection Plan Annual CBT, Classroom
Spill Emergency Response (SERP) Annual CBT, Classroom
Sewer System Management Plan and CIWQS Requirements Annual CBT, Classroom Traffic Control and Flagging 1X
Refresher – 3 Yrs. Outside Trainer
Underground Utility Locating Annual CBT, Classroom,
Outside Trainer
Violence in the Workplace Annual CBT, Classroom
45 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.3.3 Certification
The CWEA Technical Certification Program provides certification in various wastewater disciplines to promote the knowledge and skills of wastewater professionals. The City requires employees to take and pass the Collection System Operator Grade I test to be eligible for promotion to the Journey Level. The test for the required CWEA certification ensures that employees who hold this certification possess the knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform the collection system operator duties skillfully. In addition, to renew the certificate, the employee must complete 12 hours of continuing education training every two years. Information on CWEA certification can be found on the CWEA Homepage

4.4 Equipment and Critical Spare Parts Inventory
The WWC division owns an assortment of maintenance equipment and vehicles equipped both for routine maintenance and emergency response. This equipment is maintained by the Vehicle Maintenance Division of Central Services. Table 5 lists the maintenance equipment the WWC division currently owns.

Table 5 – WWC Equipment List
Qty Equipment Purpose
3 Mainline and Lateral CCTV Inspection Vans Inspection
3 Combination Hydro-Jetters PM, Emergency Response
1 Chain Flail Cutter 8”-20” diameter cleaning PM, Emergency Response 1 LMK Lateral Lining Trailer Repair
2 3 Axle Dump Truck Emergency Response, Repair
2 Caterpillar 430 Backhoe Loader Emergency Response, Repair 1 John Deere 210 Skip Loader PM, Emergency Response, Repair 1 Caterpillar 304 Excavator Emergency Response, Repair
6 Ford F-550 Crew Truck w/ Service Body; Fully equipped PM, Emergency Response, Repair 1 Emergency Response Trailer - Trailer includes 1ea. - 2” centrifugal pump, 1 ea.- 2” submersible pump, 20’ of suction hose and 200’ of discharge hose. Equipped with pipe plugs 4”- 15”, dry sweep, air compressor, generator, spill berms and required PPE.

Emergency Response, Repair
1 8-inch Trailer mounted solids handling pump, cam lock Emergency Response, Repair 1 6-inch Trailer mounted trash pump, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 1 4-inch Trailer mounted trash pump, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 60’ 8-inch suction hose, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 500’ 8-inch discharge hose, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 165’ 6-inch suction hose, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 400’ 6-inch discharge hose, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 40’ 4-inch suction hose, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 200’ 4-inch discharge hose, cam lock fittings Emergency Response, Repair 3 6’-10” pass through air plug, cam lock fitting Emergency Response, Repair 1 Lansas pipe plug, 24’ – 48” Emergency Response, Repair 46 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4.5 Critical Spare Parts
Wastewater Collection is a division of the Environmental Utilities Department, which encompasses Regional Wastewater Treatment Plants, Mechanical Maintenance, Water Distribution, Technical Services Engineering, and Solid Waste Division. The WWC Division operates, inspects and maintains the lift stations within the boundaries of the City of Roseville, however, all electrical and mechanical maintenance tasks are performed by the PM Technicians from Mechanical Maintenance Division. The Materials Technician maintains the WWC Division’s inventory list and re-order levels at Dry Creek WWTP. The list of critical spare parts is in Table 6.

Table 6 – WWC Critical Spare Parts
1 Lansas pipe plug, 26” – 60” Emergency Response, Repair 1 Lansas pipe plug, 42” – 78” Emergency Response, Repair 3 10”-16” pass through air plug, cam lock fitting Emergency Response, Repair 3 15”-21” pas through air plug, cam lock fitting Emergency Response, Repair 2 10” pass through plug, threaded end Emergency Response, Repair 1 10’ x 9’ aluminum shore box Emergency Response, Repair 2 10’ x 4’ aluminum shore box Emergency Response, Repair 2 End Shores 24” to 42” Emergency Response, Repair
5 22”-36” Speed Shore 5’ length Emergency Response, Repair 4 28”-45” Speed Shore 7’ length Emergency Response, Repair 6 22”-36” Speed Shore 7’ length Emergency Response, Repair 6 48” x 96” Fin-form Plywood Emergency Response, Repair EU
Name
PLC Model Pumps Fuses Level
Control
Comm
Connection
HMI Heater/Overloads
WC06 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
Fiber PA-200 Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC07 Koyo D2-250 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
GE MDS SD4 Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC08 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC09 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC11 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC13 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC14 Modicon
M340
N/A On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
GE MDS SD4 SE Maguells
HMISTU855
N/A
47 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
WC15 Modicon
M340
N/A On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
GE MDS SD4 SE Maguells
HMISTU855
N/A
WC16 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC17 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed/
1-warehouse
On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC19 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC22 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed/
1-warehouse
On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC23 Modicon
M340
2-Installed/
1-warehouse
On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
Proxim Radio to
PG. Future Fiber
PA-220r
SE Maguells
HMISTU855
Installed/Warehouse
WC24 Koyo D2-250 2 +
1-Installed
On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC25 Koyo D2-250 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
GE MDS SD4 Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC26 Koyo D2-250 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
WC28 Koyo D2-250-1 2-Installed On Site Transducer/
Floats -
Warehouse
MDS 4710A Optimate
OP-620
Installed/Warehouse
48 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

T H I S P A G E L E F T I N T E N T I O N A L L Y B L A N K 49 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S M P E L E M E N T 5
5 D e si g n a nd Pe r fo r ma nc e Pr o vi sio ns
Att. D-5 Updated design criteria and construction standards and specifications, for the construction, installation, repair, and rehabilitation of existing and proposed system infrastructure components, including but not limited to pipelines, pump stations, and other system appurtenances.(b) Procedures and standards for inspection and testing of newly constructed, newly installed, repaired, and rehabilitated system pipelines, pumps, and other equipment and appurtenances.

5.1 Sanitary Sewer Design Standards
The purpose of the City Design Standards is to provide direction in the application of improvements that are to be dedicated to the public and accepted by the City for maintenance or operation and to provide for joint development of those facilities to be used by and for the protection of the public. This includes certain private works and improvements to be installed within existing City rights-of-way and easements. Whereas these Standards intend to govern all new construction, City staff shall interpret and apply the Standards in a manner that achieves their intent while encouraging and enabling the redevelopment of infill and vacant parcels, especially within the City’s Redevelopment Project Area. These Standards shall apply to, regulate, and guide the preparation of traffic impact studies and the design and preparation of plans for construction of streets, highways, alleys, drainage, sewerage, traffic signals, site access, water supply facilities and related public improvements, and shall set guidelines for all private works which involve drainage, grading, trees, and related improvements. The City’s sewer Design Standards are located on the City’s website at Sewer Design Standards

5.1.1 Sanitary Sewer Construction Standards
The purpose of the City Construction Standards is to provide minimum standards to be applied to improvements which are to be dedicated to the public and accepted by the city for maintenance or operation and certain private works, as well as improvements to be installed within existing rightsof-way and easements. This is necessary to provide for coordinated development of required facilities to be used by and for the protection of the public. These Construction Standards shall apply to, regulate, and guide construction of streets, highways, alleys, drainage, sewerage, traffic signals, site access, water supply facilities and related public improvements, and shall set guidelines for all private works which involve drainage, grading, trees and related improvements.

The City’s sewer Construction Standards are located on the City’s website at Sewer Construction Standards
All improvements within the City rights-of-way shall be installed in accordance with the approved improvement plans and specifications, the City of Roseville Design Standards, the City of Roseville Construction Standards, and the State of California Department of Transportation Specifications. 50 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

5.1.2 Comprehensive Response to Climate Impact
In response to the State Water Board adopted Resolution 2017-0012, titled Comprehensive Response to Climate Change, the City of Roseville Wastewater Collection Division has taken the steps to reduce its carbon footprint by requiring the use of vitrified clay pipe over PVC pipe in all sewer infrastructure projects. The natural materials, minimal processing, and durability of vitrified clay pipes make them have a lower carbon footprint compared to other types of pipes. Vitrified clay pipe, made from natural and abundant materials like clay and water, emit significantly fewer greenhouse gases during production compared to PVC, which relies on fossil fuel-based materials and energy-intensive chemical processes. The production of vitrified clay pipe, on average, results in the emission of around 250 kg of CO₂ per ton. In contrast, manufacturing the same amount of PVC pipe can produce over 1,900 kg of CO₂, which is nearly 8 times higher in emissions. Thus, the City of Roseville makes an environmentally conscious decision to require vitrified clay pipe. This choice not only decreases greenhouse gas emissions but also offers many advantages, such as remarkable durability, recyclability, and minimal environmental impact when the pipe reaches the end of its lifecycle. The City of Roseville has showed its dedication to sustainable development and climate-conscious planning by requiring the use of Vitrified Clay Pipe instead of PVC.

The City has developed a project for easement mainline condition assessment to evaluate system accessibility and identify critical areas based on condition and environmental impact in case of a blockage or spill. These areas are offsite and are subject to flooding and bank erosion, therefore the city’s efforts here will prevent environmental impacts from spills should they occur. The project will provide a comprehensive understanding of the system’s condition, recommend improvements for access to the offsite segments, and prioritize areas for action with a ranking system from 1 to 10, guiding the City’s efforts to address the most critical issues.

5.2 Sewer System Construction and Performance Testing
Section 91-12 of the City’s Sanitary Sewer Construction standards defines the criteria for testing of installed sewer improvements. Sewer mains, services, manholes and appurtenances shall be tested by the following procedures.

5.2.1 Testing Of Installed Improvements
A. Sewer Mains and Services – Public and private sewer mains and services shall be air-tested per ASTM C828 by the Contractor and the Environmental Utilities Department shall provide closed circuit TV inspection, after installation of the joint trench utility crossings and subgrade elevations have been met. Additionally, pipeline segments beneath road bases to be lime- treated shall be tested before and after the lime treatment process.

B. Air Pressure Test – Sewer mains and laterals shall be pressure tested in accordance with the National Clay Pipe Institute recommended guidelines with the following amendment:
51 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

1. The minimum test time shall be 60 seconds. The section of a sewer being tested must be pressurized to 3.5 psi, and during the test time must hold 2.5 psi or greater, or the section has failed.

2. For mains installed in an area where the water table is higher than the pipe, the test pressure shall be increased 0.5 PSI per foot of water over the pipe.

3. The test gauge shall be liquid-filled, capable of testing up to 15 PSI, and graduated to 1/10 PSI.

C. TV Inspection – TV inspection of sewer mains and services shall be performed by the Environmental Utilities Department, Wastewater Division. Costs for said inspection shall be borne by the Contractor. Preliminary inspections may be performed by outside contractors but shall not be accepted by the Environmental Utilities Department as an official record.

1. The sewer system shall be completely cleaned by an approved method prior to TV inspection. The sewer system shall be rejected if any of the following conditions exist:
a. For main lines 12 inches and smaller - standing water or sags greater than 1⁄2 inch in depth at acceptance or greater than 1 inch at warranty. b. For main lines exceeding 12 inches - standing water or sags greater than 3⁄4 of an inch in depth at acceptance and greater than 1 1⁄2 inches at warranty. c. Standing water in services.
d. Offset joints.
e. Joint separations greater than 1⁄2 inch wide.
f. Damaged pipe.

D. Inspection Criteria for Coated Ductile Iron Pipe – All ductile iron sewer will have the following additional inspection requirements:

1. The condition of the barrel section of pipe as well as 360◦ at each joint shall be recorded to a DVD or portable drive. Once completed, and the inspection demonstrates the pipe meets the City’s construction standards, the contractor may proceed with the backfill of the trench. The Contractor shall provide the DVD and a map of the section inspected, to the Wastewater Collection Division for review prior to the City’s acceptance inspection.

2. Upon finding any deficiency in the pipe which does not meet the design and construction standards of the City of Roseville, it is strongly encouraged that the contractor makes the necessary corrections at that time. If deficiencies aren’t corrected City forces at time of acceptance CCTV will identify these deficiencies and require the contractor to dig and replace the pipe sections; there will be no exceptions.

3. The observation data on the DVD provided to the City shall include the following:
a. City wide job number.
b. Encroachment permit number.
c. Project name.
d. Location (street name)
e. Manhole numbers (based on approved plan set or city asset numbers if applicable). f. Direction of inspection (upstream or downstream).
g. Date of inspection.
52 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

4. The speed of travel shall be slow enough to inspect each pipe joint, wye connection, coating integrity, and potential sags. Camera speed should travel at a rate of no more than 30 feet per minute. The camera speed shall be steady and slow enough to record features and defects.

E. Manholes – Sewer manholes shall pass a vacuum test consisting of the following criteria and procedures:

1. The test shall be performed after assembly of the manhole and installation of the pipe entering or exiting the manhole, but prior to backfilling. The Contractor shall perform the test and supply all test equipment. The Development Services Inspector shall witness the test results.

2. Lift holes shall be filled with non-shrink grout prior to testing.

3. Pipe entering and exiting the manhole shall be plugged. The plug shall be places on the flex joint outside of the manhole base. Securely brace the plugs to prevent them from being drawn into the manhole. Unused channels shall be permanently plugged with a plastic or clay stopper.

4. A vacuum of 10 inches of mercury shall be drawn to start the test. The amount of time required for the vacuum to drop to 9 inches shall be measured. The manhole will pass the test if the amount of elapsed time is greater than 60 seconds for a 48-inch manhole, 75 seconds for a 60-inch manhole, 90 seconds for a 72-inch manhole and 120 seconds for an 84- inch manhole. A liquid-filled vacuum gauge shall be used for testing. All detectable leaks shall be repaired with non- shrink grout while the vacuum is drawn. No mortar shall be applied to the inside of the manhole until the vacuum test has passed.

5. If the manhole fails the initial test, necessary repairs shall be made with a non-shrink grout while the vacuum is still being drawn. Retesting shall proceed until elapsed times are satisfactory.

6. After passing the vacuum test, all joints shall then be mortared, inside and out. Outside mortared joints shall be allowed to dry 24 hours or as approved by the Development Services Inspector before backfilling.

7. If damage to the manhole is evident any time during the construction, the Development Services Inspector may require repairs to be made on the manhole which will require a new vacuum test prior to acceptance.

8. Topside Improvements – When all water, recycled water and sewer infrastructures have passed air, vacuum, pressure, and continuity test as well as CCTV inspection the Development Services Inspector will email a notification to internal departments indicating that the project is ready for road bases and top side improvements only. This does not constitute approval for use of the infrastructure.

9. Tying Into the City System – A tie-in procedure shall be submitted and approved by the Environmental Utilities Department prior to the proposed work. The contractor shall allow for up to 7 days for review of the procedures by the Environmental Utilities Department.

The sewer system shall be tied into the City system within 10 working days upon completing and passing all the testing procedures. Tie-ins shall be conducted as specified in Section 91- 2 of the Construction Standards.
53 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

5.2.2 Punchlist Process
After the sewer manholes have been raised and finished to grade, the sewer system shall have a final ball and flush in the presence of the Development Services Inspector. The system shall then have a final TV inspection to ensure the entire sewer system is intact for warranty. Final ball and flush can be done by city forces on a time and material basis at the request of the contractor.

When all improvements are complete, the contractor shall provide a written request for a punch list inspection of the improvements. With the assistance and presence of the Contractor, the wastewater facilities punch list shall be generated by the Development Services Inspector and Wastewater Collection Division.

5.2.3 Repairing Installed Improvements
Sewer mains, services, manholes and appurtenances shall be repaired per these Construction Standards and by the following procedures.

A. Repairing Vitrified Clay Pipe

1. Damaged pipe shall be exposed and replaced in-kind by “bridging” the new pipe into place. Coupling devices shall not be used.

2. Sagging or misaligned pipe shall be exposed and corrected in place if possible. If the pipe is defective, then a new pipe shall be bridged in place.

3. After the correction has been completed, the excavation shall be backfilled and compacted to grade as specified. The repairs shall then be retested per section 91-12 of these Construction Standards.
54 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

T H I S P A G E L E F T I N T E N T I O N A L L Y B L A N K 55 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S M P E L E M E N T 6
6 S p il l E mer g enc y R e sp o nse Pl a n

6.1 Notification Procedures
The WWC division maintains an Overflow Emergency Response Plan that covers the wastewater system and Lift Station response and procedures. Page numbers included in the flowchart reference the Spill Emergency Response Plan, not the SSMP. Figure 7 summarizes the response procedures. Refer to Appendix 6 for the complete Spill Emergency Response Plan.

Att. D-6 The Plan must include an up to date Spill Emergency Response Plan to ensure prompt detection and response to spills to reduce spill volumes and collect information for prevention of future spills. The Spill Emergency Response Plan must include procedures to: (1) Notify primary responders, appropriate local officials, and appropriate regulatory agencies of a spill in a timely manner; (2) Notify other potentially affected entities (for example, health agencies, water suppliers, etc.) of spills that potentially affect public health or reach waters of the State; (3) Comply with the notification, monitoring and reporting requirements of this General Order, State law and regulations, and applicable Regional Water Board Orders; (4) Ensure that appropriate staff and contractors implement the Spill Emergency Response Plan and are appropriately trained; (5) Address emergency system operations, traffic control and other necessary response activities; (6) Contain a spill and prevent/minimize discharge to waters of the State or any drainage conveyance system; (7) Minimize and remediate public health impacts and adverse impacts on beneficial uses of waters of the State; (8) Remove sewage from the drainage conveyance system; (9) Clean the spill area and drainage conveyance system in a manner that does not inadvertently impact beneficial uses in the receiving waters; (10) Implement technologies, practices, equipment, and interagency coordination to expedite spill containment and recovery; (11) Implement pre-planned coordination and collaboration with storm drain agencies and other utility agencies/departments prior, during, and after a spill event; (12) Conduct post-spill assessments of spill response activities; (13) Document and report spill events as required in this General Order; and (14) Annually, review and assess effectiveness of the Spill Emergency Response Plan, and update the Plan as needed.

Figure 7 – SERP Flowchart
56 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
The WWC division strives to operate, manage, and maintain all parts of the sanitary sewer system to prevent spills and mitigate the impacts quickly and efficiently should an spill occur. The OnCall emergency vehicle contains a three-ring binder that includes the division’s spill emergency response manual, the response plan, chain of communication, and notification procedures. In addition, the truck is equipped with the necessary tools and equipment to control and contain overflows and clear lower lateral blockages. The truck is outfitted with pneumatic plugs, rubber berms, and dry sweep, all of which are effective means of containment. Table 7 summarizes the division’s notification procedures.

Table 7 – Notification Guide
57 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

6.2 Emergency Response Procedures
The City of Roseville developed this Spill Emergency Response. This plan ensures that all spill responses are conducted efficiently and effectively while meeting all regulatory requirements of the General Order.

The Division has provided all employees with a binder containing the SERP, estimation tables and strategies for notifying primary responders, local officials and regulatory agencies.

6.2.1 Goals of SERP
This SERP aims to ensure that all wastewater collection personnel follow the established guidelines in cleaning up and decontaminating spills within the City's collection system service area. The City's goals concerning spill response are:

A. Respond quickly to minimize the extent of the spill;

1. The division's goal is a 20-minute response time during business hours and 40 minutes after hours.

B. Contain the spill to the extent feasible;
C. Eliminate the cause of the spill;
D. Eliminate public contact with the spill;
E. Mitigate the impact of the spill; and
F. Comply with the RWQCB Monitoring and Reporting requirements

6.2.2 Respond and Assess
Calls for service come through either the office landline or a 24-hour answering service. Calls for service to the Administrative Technician are documented in a service request in the City's CMMS.

In turn, the Technician will dispatch the call with all information to the on-call service worker via cellular phone. After business hours, the City's contracted answering service is provided a script of questions used to collect information from the caller. Once gathered, they also dispatch the call information via cellular phone to the on-call service worker. After the call, the answering service time stamps the call, and an email is sent to the division management and service call address with all pertinent information regarding the call. Additionally, the wastewater treatment plant staff monitors lift station SCADA alarms. Operators notify the on-call service worker via cellular phone if they receive an alarm at any of the City's lift stations.

Assessment starts with the phone call to the customer. Upon contact with the resident, request that the resident stop all water use, then begin gathering as much relevant information as possible such as:

A. Description of problem
B. Specific location if a spill has occurred (e.g.,. manhole in the street, front or back of the property, cleanout box)
C. The approximate time the spill was noticed helps tremendously in determining the start time of the spill.
58 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
D. Any other observations from the caller (e.g., currently spilling, odor, duration of the spill, slow drains, currently spilling, water use in home)
E. If the service worker believes an active spill is occurring, they will mobilize a hydro-vac immediately to the location.

F. The wastewater crewmember arriving first at the scene is the First Responder. Upon arrival, the first Responder will quickly assess the spill to determine the extent, spill category, and resources needed to address the spill. The First Responder is responsible for the following:

1. Location of the spill by the address and cross street the spill appearance point (i.e., manhole, cleanout, lift station, etc.)

2. Documenting the time the call was received, time of arrival, and determining the start and stop times of the spill. The SSO Start Time Policy in will aid in establishing the start and stop time for the spill.

3. Determine the extent and the category of the spill;
i. If the spill is a Category 1 or 2, notify the Superintendent or Supervisor immediately. Cal OES notification is required within 2 hours of becoming aware of the spill.
ii. Did the spill cause a backup in a structure? – The Flooded Structures Procedures in Section 6.4 addresses the process
iii. Did the spill enter into a drainage conveyance system? iv. If a potential for public exposure is present, control foot and auto traffic through the area
v. Other concerns due to the spill
a. Is the spill related to a street collapse?
b. Is the spill related to recent construction work?
c. Has the spill displaced a manhole cover creating a traffic hazard

4. Requesting additional wastewater crews or personnel as needed;

5. All field documentation, including photographs of the spill and completion of the Field Spill Report Form
G. If the spill is a Category 1, follow directions from RWQCB, Placer County Environmental Health, or the Department of Fish and Wildlife for posting warning signs around the contaminated area.

6.2.3 Spill Categories
Individual spill notification, monitoring and reporting must be in accordance with the following spill categories:

A. Category 1 - any volume of sewage from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that results in a discharge to:

1. A surface water, including a surface water body that contains no flow or volume of water.
i. A drainage conveyance system that discharges to surface waters when the sewage is not fully captured and returned to the sewer system or disposed of properly.
59 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
ii. Any spill volume not recovered from a drainage conveyance system is considered a discharge to surface water unless the drainage conveyance system discharges to a dedicated stormwater infiltration basin or facility.

2. Category 2 - is a spill of 1,000 gallons or greater from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that does not discharge to a surface water.

3. Category 3- is a spill of equal to or greater than 50 gallons and less than 1,000 gallons from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that does not discharge to a surface water.

4. Category 4 - is a spill of less than 50 gallons from or caused by a sanitary sewer system regulated under this General Order that does not discharge to a surface water.

6.2.4 Spill Containment
Containment of a spill becomes increasingly difficult once the overflow reaches a drainage conveyance system or a waterway. The quicker the spill's source and extent can be identified, contained, or controlled significantly reduces the spill's impact. Upon arrival, survey the scene to determine the potential spill appearance point. There are times when responding to a spill, the source of the spill is potable water, a backyard drain, or a storm issue. Once confirmed that the spill is the sewer, mobilize the necessary personnel and equipment for assistance. During dry weather, the drainage conveyance system can store the spill, if plugged at a point downstream of the spill. Multiple techniques are identified to contain the spill depending on the circumstances, spill category, and material available. In no particular order, the list below includes possible containment options for field crews
60 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

1. Containment with Hydro-Vac
Determine a location downstream of the spill appearance point where the hydro-vac unit can be set up to capture all spilled water. Ensure no storm drain inlets are between the containment and spill appearance points. Continue vacuuming overflow until the blockage has been cleared, then proceed with the spill's cleanup. Wash all debris and spill evidence into the vacuum tube for removal and disposal at the DCWWTP.

2. Containment Using Berms and Mats
Utilize dirt, dry sweep, a rubber berm, sandbags, or other obstructing material that is readily available to block drain inlets and ponds the spill to a naturally low area to contain and minimize the spill's impact. If possible, divert the spill to a downstream manhole unaffected by the blockage. Attempt containment by covering any affected storm drain inlets with rubber mats and securing them with sandbags, dirt, or other heavy objects to keep them in place.

3. Containment Using Pneumatic Plugs
Plugging the affected drain inlet or multiple drain inlets with a pneumatic plug can be effective. For example, a pneumatic plug in the storm drain outfall would prevent the overflow from reaching the waterway. However, depending on the location within the City, drain inlets will vary in size, so utilizing plugs may not be the best option.

H. Backup in Structure
Advise the customer to keep family members and pets out of the spill areas to not track any contamination into non-affected areas. If necessary, evacuate affected people and pets.

1. During regular business hours, notify Risk Management at 916-774-5420 or 916-774- 5202. After hours or if there is no answer at the above numbers, contact Risk Manager Virginia Bolmsn at 916-501-2073.

2. If Risk Manager or their staff cannot be reached, contact one of the approved restoration companies in the order below and authorize cleanup services only:
i. Serv-Pro 916-632-2250
ii. Restoration Management 800-400-5058

3. Before the restoration company or the Risk Manager arrives, hand the resident our camera and ask them to photograph the affected area. Do not enter the house, even if invited.

4. If the resident declines the cleaning services, request that they sign and date the Declination of Clean Up Services Form.

I. Overflow into Storm Drain Conveyance System (DCS)

1. Trace overflow in the DCS to the downstream endpoint using the Stormwater Map on the GIS. Plug all affected storm drain outfalls or block the creek and channels to contain the spill.
61 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

2. While tracing the system, if you determine that the spill is contained within a mainline section, plug the downstream end at a manhole to contain the spill. Many storm drain manholes are built with sumps in the base, and depending on the spill volume, these sumps may prevent the spill from continuing downstream. Note all the storm drain assets cleaned on the Field Spill Report Form.

3. If a stormwater pump station is near the spill and may be affected, contact Streets Division to turn off the pumps.

J. If the spill is a Category 1 spill, follow directions from RWQCB, Placer County Environmental Health, or the Department of Fish and Wildlife for posting warning signs around the containment area.

6.2.5 Traffic Control (WWC Personnel)
Traffic control may be needed immediately to protect the health and safety of the public and responding wastewater crews. Typically, immediate traffic control is necessary if there is a street collapse or significant undermining of the pavement section related to the blockage and sewer spill, if the manhole cover is ajar, or if the spill causes street flooding. In addition, temporary traffic control may be needed to allow responding crews to contain and clear the blockage and prevent sewer from being further dispersed by vehicular traffic.

K. Provide traffic control per Cal Trans Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH) B. Control public contact with the spill by isolating the area with barricades, signs or traffic cones.

C. If necessary, use other departments (i.e. Police, Public Works) to ensure adequate traffic control. Contact Roseville Police/Fire Dispatch at 916-774-5123 to coordinate.

6.2.6 Correct Cause
The cause of the overflow may be located a considerable distance downstream of the spill in areas with flat terrain. During significant rain events, overflows can be caused by excessive I&I in the collection system. I&I can significantly increase the flow in a collection system and cause overflows from pipes that are only partially blocked. I&I can also directly affect the hydraulic capacity of mainlines and lift stations. Under these conditions, stopping the overflow may not be possible until the flows recede.

L. Locate the cause of the overflow

1. Sewer Main
i. Check flow in manholes
ii. Blockage should be between a manhole with sluggish flow or surcharging and a manhole with very little flow or completely dry
iii. Clear the mainline blockage using a hydro-vac unit from the dry manhole.

Refer to SOP WWC-002 for hydro-vac procedures. Observe the material that flows downstream after clearing the obstruction to determine the possible cause of the blockage and note it on the spill report form.
iv. Continue to monitor manholes in the area until the surcharged manhole empties.
62 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
v. If the blockage cannot be cleared. Increase containment and request additional crews for assistance.
a. Perform a CCTV inspection to determine the blockage
b. Request additional hydro-vacs to contain, or initiate by-pass pumping c. Dig and repair the sewer main to correct pipe defect

2. Sewer Service
i. Check flow in the city cleanout. If the riser is full of water, wait until a hydrovac is onsite to remove or contain the water before eeling. If the cleanout is holding but not full, carefully insert the gas powered ell rod and cutting head into the service until you contact the obstruction. Inserting the eel rod quickly, can cause the service to spill. Proceed with the eeling process until the service drains, then CCTV inspect to identify the blockage details. ii. If the City cleanout is dry and the resident is still plugged, the stoppage is likely on the private side and is not the City's responsibility. However, it is good customer service to CCTV the service to ensure the City line is clear. iii. If no city cleanout exists, but the resident has a 4" private cleanout, run this private cleanout to clear the blockage. Once removed, CCTV to determine the location of the problem. Refer to Appendix D to determine if the private cleanout meets the criteria before using city equipment. iv. Check the upstream and downstream mains if a city or private cleanout cannot be located. If the main is running clear, notify the resident that the problem is on their side, and explain the city cleanout installation policy. v. If the service line ties into a dead-end run, regardless if the City cleanout is clear, clean the mainline segment with a hydro-vac.

3. Lift Station
i. Check the alarm status inside the control panel for indication of a problem. ii. If no power is present:
a. Contact Roseville Electric to verify the outage and an estimated time the power will be restored.
b. Determine the wet well level and remaining downtime left at the station. c. If downtime exceeds the max allowable retention, mobilize additional wastewater crews and a hydro-vac to the station. If the power outage is extensive, request multiple hydro-vacs for assistance.
d. Continue vacuuming the wet well until power is restored and the lift station operates in auto mode. Watch the station for an entire pump cycle before leaving.
iii. If power is present, but the pumps aren't operating in auto, switch the controls to the hand position. If the pumps are operational in hand mode, contact the on-call EU electrician and continue running and monitoring the station in hand mode.
63 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
iv. If portable generation is required to power the station, the on-call EU Electrician must be onsite to make the connections. All control panels have an exterior plug and disconnects for portable generation connection, with each station having a specific cable. All cables are labeled and located in the EU Maintenance shop.

4. Force Main
i. If the spill is from a ruptured force main, control the power using the written Energy Control Procedures (ECP), located in the door panel at the station. A qualified electrician shall perform the switching of any panel breakers. ii. Contain the spill from the pipe break using the containment procedures in Section IV.
iii. Monitor and control the wet well levels using bypass pumping or hydro-vac units until the repair is completed.
iv. If the station is equipped with dual force mains, transfer flows to the additional force main to continue normal lift station operation.

6.2.7 Final Volume Estimate (WWC Personnel)
The final overflow volume is estimated to determine if additional reporting to regulatory agencies is required and for the City of Roseville’s records when reporting to CIWQS. A minimum of five (5) pictures are required for every spill response, and locations are noted on the field spill report. Place an object in the photo for contrast. The following methods are approved for determining the gallons spilled during an overflow event.

Eyeball Estimation- Estimate the overflow rate out of a clean out by estimating the time needed to fill up a known volume, such as a five-gallon bucket. Imagine the amount of water that would spill from this bucket. This method is useful on spills that occur on hard surfaces such as concrete or asphalt
Measured Volume- The volume of most small spills that have been contained can be estimated using this method. The shape, dimensions and depth of the contained wastewater are needed. This information is used to calculate area and volume of the spills.

1. Determine the shape of the spill

2. Measure or pace off the dimensions. Measure the depth at several locations and calculate the average. Convert all dimensions to feet.

3. To calculate the area square footage, use the following:
a. Rectangle: Length (ft.) x Width (ft.)
W
I
D
T
H
LENGTH
H
BASE
H
E
I
G
H
T

DIAMETER
64 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
b. Triangle: Height (ft.) x Base (ft.) x .5
c. Circle: Diameter (ft.) x Diameter (ft.) x .785
d. Multiply the area (sq. ft.) by the depth (feet), to get the volume in cubic feet.

Multiply your volume by 7.48 to convert to gallons.

Not all SSO’s will conform to the shapes above. If this occurs, break the area up as much as possible into known shapes and calculate the volume in each.

Calculating large volume spills is challenging because the area and depth are difficult to measure, and chances are these spills are not fully contained. Several methods are available to determine the volume.

Flow Estimation Chart- The table below (Section 5 of the SSOERP binder) presents pictures with varying flowrates of sewage overflowing from a manhole. Estimate the overflow rate by comparing the overflowing manhole with the pictures shown below.

Original Spill
Original spill
broken out into
three known
shapes
65 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Flow Rate and Duration- Overflow volume can be estimated by multiplying the overflow duration by the overflow rate. The overflow rate can be determined by pick hole or vent hole spill height (section 5, SSOERP binder), flow meter data, SCADA information and pump data from lift stations.

The overflow volume can be estimated with the following formula:

Volume (gal)= estimated flow rate (gpm) x duration of overflow (minutes) 66 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
The charts below represent measurement point and flow rates based off height of water column measured.

Estimated Flow EDU Chart – This method can be used for overflows from residential properties when enough information has been gathered through interviewing the resident.

Be clear with your questions and explanation for the interview. Only interview residents from the household contributing to the SSO. The table below is based off our design criteria of 190 gpd and is included on the Field Spill report. It is a quick way to estimate volume from small overflows.

Figure 1- Flow Rate Exiting MH Pick Hole
67 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Figure 8 – EDU Flow Chart
Time Period
Estimated City Flow Rate Per EDU (190 gpd) Spill

A B C D E F
Gallons
Per
Period
Hours Per
Period
A÷B =
Gallons
Per Hour
C÷60 =
Gallons
Per Minute
Minutes
Spill Was
Active
D x E=
Gallons
Spilled Per
Period
6am -Noon 75 6 12.5 .21
Noon – 6pm 55 6 9.16 .15
6pm -
Midnight 50 6 8.33 .14
Midnight -
6am 10 6 1.67 .03
Total Estimated Spill Volume
However, if a large spill occurs with multiple homes, commercial or mixed-use involved, and there isn’t sufficient information to calculate an estimate, use the City of Roseville Design Standard 9-2, Average Dry Weather Unit Flow Factors chart below. Count the units that are affecting the overflow and multiply by the flow factors on the chart below based on the land use designation.
68 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

6.2.8 Initiate Cleanup (WWC Personnel)
Disinfection of contaminated soil or drainage ways is only performed when directed by appropriate agencies such as Placer County Environmental Health and CA Dept of Fish and Wildlife
A. Flooded building or structure

1. If building or structure is flooded due to a failure in the city’s collection system, contact Risk Management or Dave Rawe after hours. Risk Management will respond and assess and notify restoration companies on contract with the city.

2. Storm Drain or Drainage Way
i. Pump out or vacuum any ponded water present
ii. Remove debris
iii. Wash concrete and contain all wash water and remove iv. Remove contaminated soil and plants
v. High pressure clean affected storm drains and vacuum all water vi. Remove all containment and finish flushing and vacuuming area

3. Street, Curb or Gutter
i. Remove debris with Vactor
ii. Wash pavement, curb and gutter area , and vacuum all water with Vactor
iii. If Vactor decant pump is used, utilize decant apparatus to alleviate possibility of secondary spill and provide fall protection at open manhole.

6.2.9 Receiving Water Sampling (Industrial Waste Section) To comply with subsection D.7(v) of the SSS WDRs, the enrollee shall develop and implement an SSO Water Quality Monitoring Program to assess impacts from SSOs to surface waters in which 50,000 gallons or greater are spilled to surface waters. The SSO Water Quality Monitoring Program, shall, at a minimum:

I. Contain protocols for water quality monitoring
II. Account for spill travel time in the surface water and scenarios where monitoring may not be possible (e.g. safety, access restrictions)
III. Require water quality analyses for ammonia and bacterial indicators to be performed by an accredited or certified laboratory.

IV. Require instruments and devices used to implement the SSO Water Quality Monitoring Program to be properly maintained and calibrated, including any records to document maintenance and calibration to ensure their continued accuracy.

V. Within 48 hours of the enrollee becoming aware of the SSO, require water quality sampling for, at a minimum, the following constituents
a. Ammonia
b. Appropriate Bacterial indicator(s) per the applicable Basin Plan water quality objective or Regional Board direction which may include total and fecal coliform, enterococcus, and e- coli.
69 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

6.2.10Notification Requirements (Superintendent/Supervisor) All overflows are required by law, to be promptly reported to regulatory agencies. The Legal Responsible Official (s) or their designee will make all notifications to regulatory agencies regarding reportable SSOs. All SSOs are tracked in the City of Roseville’s CMMS.

A. Prompt notification to regulatory agencies will be achieved by using the SSO Notification Guide (Tab 4)
B. All information regarding the spill will be documented on the SSO Field Report Form
C. Documentation and Data Tracking

1. All SSOs are tracked with a service request module in the City of Roseville’s CMMS. Completed service requests, work order requests and any overtime tags are turned into Superintendent/Supervisor for QA/QC. These are all resolved in the CMMS. Service requests for after-hours call will be generated the following business day.

2. Follow up PM work orders are generated to CCTV inspect affected lines and recommendations from CCTV crew are reviewed by Superintendent or Supervisor. Further recommendations regarding repair, replacement, or preventative maintenance schedule adjustment are made on the System Failure Analysis Form.

3. Field report forms are turned into Supervisor or Superintendent, who enters data into the CIWQS website. A minimum of 5 pictures is required for every SSO
D. Ensure that all appropriate documentation has been completed in the CMMS.

1. Private commercial spills, crew will provide a work order request to Supervisor documenting hours worked, equipment used and actions taken for billing purposes.

2. Private residential spills, crew will provide a work order request to Supervisor documenting hours worked, equipment used and actions taken.

6.3 Staff and Contractor Training
To train WWC Employees on the importance of the SSOERP, Supervisors created a Powerpoint Presentation as a training resource. The interactive presentation covers the written SSOERP in a classroom setting. This setting allows employees to clarify any elements within the procedure. The annual training is followed by a competency test and classroom spill simulation. In addition, WWC employees built a spill simulator in the training yard at the DCWWTP to test employees’ skills in estimating spills. If desired, supervisors can create spills from either a manhole, cleanout, or both. The water is metered and creates an accurate simulation within the confines of the WWTP.

Contractors are provided with the City’s wastewater collection system policies and procedures.

Per the contract, they are required to train all their employees on the City’s wastewater collection system policies and procedures before performing work on the City’s wastewater collection and conveyance system.
70 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25

6.4 Spill Mitigation and Containment
The WWC Division has written the attached SOP for spill mitigation and containment. The plan is described throughout the SSOERP and in the Table 6-1 flowchart. Whenever a Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) occurs, the highest priority is to contain the overflow and minimize the exposure to the public or the environment. This procedure will address the specific processes available to contain an SSO. Containment of an SSO becomes more difficult once the overflow reaches storm drain systems or a waterway. The quicker the source and the extent of the overflow can be identified, contained, or controlled, reduces the SSO's impact exponentially. Following the Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) goals, quick response and containment will protect public health and safety while minimizing the environment's negative impacts.

The assessed hazards that may exist when responding to an SSO are:
• Traffic control
• Bloodborne pathogens
• Slips, trips, and falls
• Atmospheric conditions
• Pneumatic plugs
• Sprains and back injuries
Upon arrival to the location, survey the scene to determine the potential overflow location and source. There are times when called for a sewer overflow, and the source is potable water or storm drainage. Once determined, the water source is the sewer, mobilize the necessary wastewater collection personnel and equipment needed for assistance. Determine the category of the overflow, discharge points, and whether the SSO can reach Water of the State. Immediate notification to the Office of Emergency Services is required, should the overflow reach waters of the state. If the spill cannot be eliminated by controlling water flow from a residential or commercial building, more than likely, this spill is either a plugged main, structural deficiency, or an inoperable lift station.

The area impacted by the spill and the potential work area shall be secured to divert vehicle traffic and pedestrians away from the area by using any combination of signs, cones, delineators, barricades, arrow boards, or caution tape. Multiple techniques are identified to contain the spill depending on the circumstances, spill category, and material available. In no order, the list below is possible containment options.
71 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Containment
Situation Options for Containment
Curb and
Gutter
• Create berm with rubber berm, dry sweep, dirt, or
sandbags; Utilize natural low spots or grade deviations • Use hydro-vac to control overflow
Lift Station
Failure
• Use hydro-vac to contain
• Backup generator
• Bypass pumping
Open Space
• Dig a trench for containment
• Sandbag berm
• Dirt berm
Creek • Plug all affected storm drain inlets
Storm Drain
System (Dry)
• Plug all affected storm drain inlets; plug outfall if necessary
• Contain using the hydro-vac
• Request additional hydro-vac support if necessary
Storm Drain
System
(Storm Event)
• Plug all affected storm drain inlets
• Emergency bypass pumping
• Turn off stormwater pump station if applicable
Building
▪ Evacuate residents if needed
▪ Pop cleanout cap off; If no city cleanout, attempt to locate ▪ Pop private cleanout if available
▪ Contain outside if overflow is relieved by
locating/removing cleanout cap
Containment with Hydro-Vac
Determine a location downstream of the spill appearance point where the hydro-vac unit can be set up and capture all water, including wash down water. Ensure no storm drain inlets are between the containment point you choose and the overflow point. Continue vacuuming overflow until the blockage has been cleared. Once cleared, wash remaining spill water to the vac tube to be vacuumed up.

Containment Using Berms and Mats
Utilize dirt, rubber berm, dry sweep, or other obstructing material to block drain inlets and pond the spill to a low natural area to contain and minimize the spill's effects. If possible, divert the spill to a downstream manhole that is not affected by the blockage.

Attempt containment by covering the affected storm drain inlet with rubber mats. Secure the mat in place with sandbags, dirt, or other heavy objects to keep in place. 72 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
Containment Using Pneumatic Plugs
Plugging the affected drain inlet or multiple drain inlets with a pneumatic plug can be effective. A pneumatic plug in the storm drain outfall would prevent the overflow from reaching the waterway. However, depending on the location within the City, drain inlets will vary in size, so utilizing plugs may not be the best option.
73 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S O E R P S S O S t a r t T i m e P o l i c y
Upon receiving call, note exact time that call received from answering service or administrative staff. This time will be used as a base for when the SSO started. Notify resident or business to stop using all water if possible.

A. Upon arrival, note if spill location point is or is not actively spilling. If not spilling from spill location point, but there is clear evidence of spill that requires a Vactor for cleanup effort, then document occurrence as a spill.

B. Initiate SSOERP to ensure that the SSO is contained, and the cause is corrected.

C. Photograph all affected areas, during the SSO, demonstrating containment and after cleanup.

Use something in picture to gauge size of area features (i.e. tape measure, 5 gal bucket, etc) Email pictures to the Superintendent after completing necessary paperwork.

D. Provide detailed description of the SSO event, including exact times of arrival, SSO stop time, containment procedures, and names of collection personnel assisting you in the overflow.

E. The following questions should be asked of the resident or the individual reporting the potential SSO:

1. Did you notice water coming from the cleanout at the property line or manhole in the street? If so, what was the approximate time?

2. Were your drains running slowly at any time prior to you calling? If so, what was the approximate time?

3. If there were neighbors outside, close to the area of the SSO, did they notice water spilling? If so, what was the approximate time?

4. Be prepared to provide a brief summary of how you determined the start time, describing the steps you took while coming to your decision.

F. If the above questions do not produce an accurate account for the SSO start time, use the time the call was received by either the office personnel or the after-hours answering service, and subtract 15 minutes. Record this time as actual start time on the SSO Field Report Form.

G. If the evidence of the spill travels a farther distance than the logic of the 15 minutes, the field crew/responders shall try to recreate the spill the following day, using clean water.

H. In the event of an SSO from a sewer lift station, the start time will be determined using information gathered from the SCADA system.

I. SSO Stop time will be determined by either:

1. The arrival time of the service worker if the overflow had stopped prior to their arrival.

2. Clearing the blockage.

3. Interview of resident or witnesses
74 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN | Updated 12 MAR 25
S S O E R P F l o o d e d S t r u c t u r e P r o c e d u r e s In the event a failure in the City’s wastewater collection system causes a Sanitary Sewer Overflow in a resident’s home or business, instruct them to:

1. Keep people and pets away from the affected area(s), and do not track contamination throughout non-affected areas.

Roseville City CouncilApril 16, 2025

Roseville City Council
April 16, 2025