Roseville City Council
October 7, 2026

1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65 Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd
2 4 5
Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16
Country Club Dr 17
Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536
Roseville Pkwy 3031
Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way
Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd
Village Green Dr Old Coach Dr
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2.dwg May 01, 2025 - 12:00pm - mliu Layout Tab: Study Intersections Study Intersections 4Figure
# STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND EXISTING TERMINAL ACCESS (STAA) TRUCK ROUTE EXCEEDS CA. LENGTH LIMIT EXISTING CA. LEGAL TRUCK ROUTE *
1 *
2 STAA ROUTE ENDS AT WATT AVE STAA ROUTE ENDS AT SIERRA COLLEGE BL THROUGH STAA ROUTE TO BE COMPLETED WITH FUTURE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION *
3 STAA ROUTE ENDS 1000' EAST OF WASHINGTON THROUGH STAA ROUTE TO BE COMPLETED WITH FUTURE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION *
4 STAA ROUTE ENDS 800' NORTH OF DOUGLAS BL DRAWN BY: R. YAKIMCHUK SCALE: NONE DATE: OCTOBER 2021 TRUCK ROUTES BLUE OAKS BLVD BASELINE RD

FIDDYMENT RD

FOOTHILLS BLVD

FOOTHILLS BLVD

ROSEVILLE RD

RIVERSIDE AVE CIRBY WAY
SUNRISE AVE N. SUNRISE AVE

SIERRA COLLEGE BLVD DOUGLAS BLVD
I-80

EUREKA RD
HWY 65

NIBLICK DR

STANFORD RANCH RD

WASHINGTON BLVD

LEAD HILL
HAYDEN
PKWY

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD
*
1 *
2 3 *
4 ROCKY RIDGE BLUE OAKS BLVD

WESTBROOK BL VISTA GRANDE BL
SANTUCCI BL LENGTH LIMIT (FEET) NB U-TURN 30' BRIDGE 35' FREEDOM WY* Truck Route Map 5 Source: Roseville Truck Routes, Updated October 2021

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Existing Conditions Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 20

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
The active transportation network consists of both pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure that work together to provide mobility options for all those that live, work, study, or play in Roseville.

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are important components of the transportation network in the study area. They not only offer non-vehicular opportunities for both commute and recreational trips but also provide connections to the region’s transit network.

Existing Bicycle Facilities
The City of Roseville Parks, Trails & Bikeways Map classifies bicycle facilities into three categories:
◼ Multi-use Paths – Designed for cyclists, pedestrians, and non-motorized vehicles; familyfriendly. ◼ Bike Lanes– On-street lanes for cyclists; speed and traffic levels vary; often accompanied by sidewalks open to cyclists.
◼ Bike Routes – Shared roadways for bicycles and vehicles, typically on streets with lower traffic volumes and speeds.

As shown in Figure 6, a multi-use path exists on Highland Pointe Drive north of Pleasant Grove Boulevard and bike routes are designated along Hallissy Drive/Gold Coast Drive. Bike lanes are present along all the roadway segments included in the study area.

CRASH HISTORY
The crash history analysis for the project was based on the most recent five years of data covering fatal and injury crashes in Placer County along Philip Road near the project frontage.

The crash data spans from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023. The Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), which is maintained by SafeTREC at the University of California, Berkeley,3 was utilized to obtain the crash data and perform a crash analysis. TIMS only includes reports on fatal and injury crashes (severe injury other visible injury and complaint of pain) and excludes crashes that are property damage-only.

Philip Road had a total of two reported crashes during the period between January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023. Both the crashes were reported as other visible injury crashes and occurred with a fixed object. While one crash had a primary crash factor of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the other crash involved unsafe speed. Both the crashes did not involve a pedestrian/bicyclist/motorcyclist.
3 Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley. 2025. https://tims.berkeley.edu/

1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65 Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd
2 4 5
Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16
Country Club Dr 17
Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536
Roseville Pkwy 3031
Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way
Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd
Village Green Dr Old Coach Dr
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2.dwg May 01, 2025 - 12:00pm - mliu Layout Tab: Study Intersections Study Intersections 4Figure
# STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Map 6 WESTBROOK

PHILLIP
HARVEY

OLD COACH

MINERS RAVINE

WESTBROOK

PLEASANT GROVE

LOVELAND

PHILLIP

SYMPHONY

NEW MEADOW
N. HAYDEN

PHILLIP

CRAWFORD

SCHELLHOUS HOLT

CUMBERLAND

VISTA G

U RANDE PLAND

PROVINCETOWN

SOLAIRE

BRICK MASON

GARLAND WAY

CRIMSON RIDGE WAY
BRADY
Mahany Fitness Center
More information about
parks, recreation facilities,
biking and walking
in Roseville:
roseville.ca.us/GetActive
Constructionanticipated2023–25
Maidu Regional Park
Maidu Regional Park
Downtown Roseville
92 94
95 90
30 32
38 44
65 34
86 63
47 40
45 52
56 53
55 57
76 84
46 33
75 43
93 72
87 85
12 80
66 83
60 58
42 91
79 49
36 74
50 61
39 37
89 88
41 68
71 59
51 70
7 2
78 48
69 82
67 35
64 81
29 17
23 3
6 22
26 4
9 8
24 5
96 77
69 27
18 19
28 15
25 21
13 16
20 14
11 31
73 62
54 98
97 10
98 99
100
101
102
Source: Roseville Parks, Trails & Bikeways Map,Updated April 2024

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 22
CEQA Evaluation
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) transportation analysis for the proposed project, evaluates the transportation impact areas that may be considered in environmental documentation for the project. A separate Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) evaluates other transportation issues such as roadway and intersection capacity which are not part of the environmental evaluation under CEQA.

State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, XVII. Transportation identifies the following factors that were evaluated:

1. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?

2. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) (vehicle miles of travel (VMT) assessment)?

3. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

4. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? The following sections include regulations and policies which apply to the CEQA evaluation, and an assessment of each of the factors identified above.

REGULATORY SETTING
This section summarizes applicable federal, state, regional, and local plans, laws, and regulations that are relevant to this analysis. The information from these regulations provide context for the discussion related to the project’s consistency with applicable policies, plans, laws, and regulations. The details of the plans and policies identified are provided in Appendix A.

Federal
No federal plans, policies, regulations or laws are applicable to the provision of land use or resources of the proposed project.

State
SENATE BILL 743
Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) was signed into law in September 2013 and took full effect in July 2020.

Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013) required changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines regarding the analysis of transportation impacts. The purpose of SB 743 is to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050 (2021)
4 The California Transportation Plan 2050 is a long-range transportation roadmap to achieve a safe, resilient and universally accessible transportation system that supports vibrant communities, 4 https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportation-planning/documents/ctp-2050-v3-a11y.pdf

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 23
advances racial and economic justice, and improves public and economic health in the State of California.

Regional
SACOG NEXT GENERATION TRANSIT STRATEGY (2021)5
SACOG’s Next Generation Transit Strategy builds upon its 2020 MTP-SCS vision for a high quality, resilient and sustainable public transit system. The objectives of the strategy are as follows:
• Getting around by transit is fast, reliable and competitive with driving. • Reduced disparities in travel time and cost; more travel options for disadvantaged communities.
• Improved transit access to top employment centers and destinations. • Transit feels easy, seamless, and safe for all users. • More coordination between agencies leads to better service for all. • Makes the best use of public dollars by minimizing costs while maintaining or increasing ridership.
• Service is adequately and consistently funded.
• Meets or exceeds targets for renewable energy, emissions and VMT.

SACOG MTP/SCS (2020)
6 SACOG’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) outlines a transportation and land use strategy to support regional prosperity, enhance access to jobs and economic opportunities, and provide transportation options and affordable housing for all. The Plan is based on four priority policy areas:
• Build vibrant places for today’s and tomorrow's residents. • Foster the next generation of mobility solutions.
• Modernize the way we pay for transportation infrastructure. • Build and maintain a safe, reliable, and multimodal transportation system.

SACOG CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS UPDATE (2020) 7
Congestion management involves implementing strategies to enhance transportation system performance and reliability by minimizing the negative effects of congestion on the movement of people and goods. Congestion Management Process (CMP) provides updated data on transportation system performance and evaluates alternative strategies that address both state and local needs. The following are the objectives outlined in the CMP:
• Maintain or improve travel time reliability for freight and passenger vehicles • Reduce traffic congestion for freight and passenger vehicles. • Promote development that encourages making trips by public transit. • Support proactive and innovative education and transportation demand management programs, covering all parts of the urbanized area, to offer a variety of choices to driving alone.
5 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/308/638218230960130000 6 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/76/638212804736270000 7 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/1810/638376412235970000

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 24
• Prioritize investments in transit, bike, and pedestrian improvements that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). • Implement pilot projects aimed at making micromobility (such as bike and scooter share) work for urban, suburban, and low-income areas of the region.

SACOG REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB DESIGN GUIDANCE8
Mobility hubs provide a seamless connection between different transportation options, enabling people to easily transition between modes to reach their destinations. The vision of SACOG’s Regional Mobility Hub Design Guidance is to establish a network of regional hubs that prioritize people, focusing on universal accessibility, safety, and community integration. These hubs are to be designed to seamlessly connect two or more transportation modes, including transit, biking, walking, shared mobility services, carpooling/vanpooling, and on-demand services and provide integrated, equitable mobility through flexible and user-friendly design.

PLACER COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2019) 9
The Placer County Regional Transportation Plan is a document developed to provide policy and funding guidelines for short-range and long-range transportation needs for the county’s transportation system over the next twenty years. The Plan’s goal is to support well-planned growth and land use patterns while improving environmental quality through better management of the transportation system. Additionally, the Plan seeks to improve access and mobility for all individuals, ensure viable travel options to jobs, services, and housing across the county.

PLACER COUNTY GENERAL PLAN (2013 UPDATE) 10
Placer County General Plan (last updated in May 2013) serves as a guiding document for land use and development in the County. Several goals and policies of the Plan are applicable to the proposed project.

PLACER COUNTY SUSTAINABILITY PLAN (2020) 11
The Placer County Sustainability Plan puts forward the analyzes and recommendations for GHG reduction and climate adaptation strategies in the unincorporated county. It sets GHG emission reduction targets for the years 2030 and 2050 for the county in MTCO2e/person and includes strategies to reduce transportation-related GHG emissions.

PLACER COUNTY REGIONAL BIKEWAY PLAN (2018) 12
The Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan updates the prior Regional Bikeway Plan adopted in 2002 and establishes a vision to promote safe, convenient, and enjoyable bicycling by establishing a comprehensive system of bikeways that link the communities throughout the county. The Plan develops a regional system of bikeways that connect six incorporated cities and other unincorporated areas of the county and proposes bikeways in the unincorporated 8 https://www.sacog.org/planning/transportation/sustainable-mobility-program/mobility-hubs 9 https://pctpa.specialdistrict.org/files/e9ce02f5b/Final_2040_RTP_Full_Document.pdf 10 https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/8571/Introduction-PDF 11 https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/42940/PCSP-ADOPTION?bidId= 12 https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/57938/Placer-County-Regional-Bikeway-Plan-FINAL-20180629?bidId=

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 25
county or bikeways requiring multijurisdictional coordination. The Plan aims to enhance bicycling for commuter and recreational use in the county through policies in three categories: safety, mobility and preservation.

The Plan proposes the following bikeways in the project’s study area:
• Baseline Road between Fiddyment Road and West County limits – Buffered Bike Lane • Pleasant Grove Road between Baseline Road and Moore Road – Shared Use Path/Side Path
Local
CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL PLAN (2020)
13 The City of Roseville General Plan 2035, adopted in 2020, acts as a policy guide for the city's future development and growth. The Plan is intended to be long-range, comprehensive and community focused. The Plan designates land use categories throughout the city, defining each land use category, including general uses, development, intensity, siting and compatibility standards.

The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines Roseville’s objectives for its circulation system, including the overall framework, level of service standards, design requirements, and policies that align with the city’s broader planning, economic, social, and environmental goals.

The objective of this element is to ensure accessibility to key destinations for all modes of travel, enhance travel options for residents, workers, and visitors, and maintain the transportation network in optimal condition.

The General Plan notes the LOS policy as “maintain a LOS “C” standard at a minimum of 70 percent of all signalized intersections and roadway segments in the City during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Exceptions to the LOS “C” standard may be considered where improvements required to achieve the standard would adversely affect pedestrian, bicycle, or transit access, and where feasible LOS improvements and travel demand reducing strategies have been exhausted.”
CITY OF ROSEVILLE PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN (2011) 14
The City of Roseville’s Pedestrian Master Plan focuses on improving the design and development of public pedestrian pathways to create a safe, efficient, and visually appealing environment for all pedestrians. The Plan aims to establish a well-connected network of sidewalks and street crossings, providing Roseville residents with diverse transportation options, including walking, biking, transit, and driving. It prioritizes inclusive design, incorporating policies, projects, and programs to promote walking as a fundamental mode of transportation, while also supporting health and recreation for people of all ages and abilities. Additionally, it proposes the creation of Pedestrian Overlay Districts in areas where increased pedestrian activity is desired through the provision of enhanced pedestrian facilities.
13 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services/Planning/City%20of% 20Roseville%20GP.pdf
14 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/Biking%20&%20Walking/Plan ning/2-2011_Pedestrian%20Master%20Plan_WEB.pdf

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 26
CITY OF ROSEVILLE COMMUNITYWIDE SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN (2010) 15 The City of Roseville Communitywide Sustainability Action Plan (SAP) outlines key objectives aimed at implementing transportation measures that reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and associated Greenhouse Gas (GHG), NOx and PM10 emissions. The objectives of the Plan aim to reduce the overall environmental footprint of the transportation system and serve as guidelines in setting VMT reduction strategies for the proposed project.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN (2008) 16
The City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan aims to achieve a balanced, multi-modal transportation system by developing a well-connected, safe, and accessible bikeway network that serves bicyclists of all levels and provides Roseville residents a variety of transportation choices, including automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian options. The Plan also focuses on creating bikeway support facilities such as bike racks and repair stations to encourage both commuter and recreational cycling. The plan sets a goal to increase bicycle use in the City by 50 percent by 2020, promoting cycling for work, school, play and other destinations through incentives and encouragement efforts.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES (2008) 17 The Community Design Guidelines establishes design and technical guidelines including a list of specific recommendations and requirements for each land use category including commercial, office and industrial, multi-family and compact residential, for including in project design.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS (2023) 18
Section 4 of the Design Standards document establishes guidelines for the preparation of traffic studies to ensure consistency of analysis and adequate information to aid City staff and decision makers in the consideration of project approval regarding impacts to the City’s transportation system.

CEQA TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
The transportation analysis assesses how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the implementation of the proposed project. This analysis includes effects that would result in significant impacts under the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. 15 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/Roseville%20Transit/Air%20Qu ality/SAP010611.pdf
16 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/Biking%20&%20Walking/Plan ning/2008%20Bicycle%20Master%20Plan2.pdf
17 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services/Planning/General%20 Plan/cdgweb032408.pdf
18 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services/Engineering/Transport ation%20Planning/Traffic%20Impact%20Study%20Standards/DS-SECTION%204_2016%20100%20percent.pdf

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 27
Thresholds of Significance
The Project’s impact is considered significant if it would:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guideline section 15064.3, subdivision (b). c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). d) Result in inadequate emergency access.

CEQA Project Impacts and Proposed Mitigations
TRAF-1 The proposed Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. (Finding: Less than significant) The project will not require substantial modifications to the transportation network except for Phillip Road along the project frontage. The modifications would not explicitly conflict with any program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including those relating to transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The project is not located within the Pedestrian Overlay Districts outlined in the City or Roseville’s Pedestrian Master Plan (2011). The project does not prohibit implementation of bicycle facilities planned in the City of Roseville's Bicycle Master Plan (2008. Additionally, the project site is not directly served by any transit routes.

Therefore, the project impact due to a conflict with existing plans, ordinances, or policies will be less than significant.

TRAF-2 Project implementation may result in VMT metrics that are greater than the applicable thresholds (15 percent below the City’s Baseline VMT metric) (Finding: Significant and Unavoidable)
Table 2 shows the City of Roseville’s established VMT thresholds derived from Table 4.3-5 of the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (certified on August 5, 2020). 19 These
thresholds are based on the City of Roseville travel forecasting model using 2016 land use assumptions and the VMT threshold is 15% below the Citywide baseline VMT metric.

Table 2: City of Roseville VMT Thresholds
Measure Non-Residential Projects Residential Projects
VMT Produced 5,459,700 1,822,100
No. of Residents 120,812 120,812
No. of Employees 67,530 --
19 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services/Engineering/Design% 20and%20Construction%20Standards/2023%20City%20of%20Roseville%20Design%20and%20Construction%20Standards.pdf (page 62 of 630).

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 28
Measure Non-Residential Projects Residential Projects
Service Population 188,342 --
Base year VMT Metric 29.0 VMT per service population 15.1 VMT per capita VMT Threshold (15% below
Base year VMT Metric)

24.5 VMT per service population 12.8 VMT per capita
The City uses VMT per service population as an efficiency metric to determine VMT impacts for non-residential projects. The service population is the sum of residents and employees. As shown in Table 2, the VMT per service population threshold for non-residential projects for the City of Roseville is 24.5.

Kittelson prepared a VMT calculation citywide and the project using the 2020 City of Roseville travel forecasting model to reflect the most recent baseline year and model. Table 3 shows the Existing Citywide Conditions and Project TAZ VMT for the full build-out of the project. The detailed methodology to calculate the Project TAZ VMT is discussed in Appendix B.

Table 3. Project TAZ VMT and Citywide Baseline VMT
Measure Existing Citywide
Conditions (2020) 1
Project TAZ VMT with
Project
VMT Produced 7,172,610 29,8052
Number of Residents 140,629 183
Number of Employees 80,350 6964
Service Population 220,979 714
VMT Metric (VMT per service population) 32.5 41.7

1. Obtained using the City of Roseville travel forecasting model for the year 2020.

2. Reported VMT is the sum of “VMT From” and “VMT To” from the Project TAZ (Traffic Analysis Zone). The VMT Produced for Project TAZ includes the VMT from residents, employees and trucks.

3. The 2020 land use in the model includes 5 single family and 2 multifamily homes for the Project TAZ. As provided in Table VMT-1, Section 4 Traffic Impact Studies of the City of Roseville’s Design Standards, the number of residents per dwelling unit in the Project TAZ is calculated based on the conversion factor of 2.68 for singlefamily homes and 2.32 for multi-family homes.

4. The number of employees is based on the trip generation for the full build-out of the project.

The VMT per service population with the project is greater than the City’s VMT per service population threshold of 24.5 for non-residential projects. Therefore, the proposed project would be considered to have a significant VMT impact. Further, as shown in Table 3, The Project TAZ VMT for the full build-out of the project is greater than the Existing Citywide conditions for the base year 2020.

Mitigation
Mitigation for VMT impacts for employment uses would include mitigation measures TRAF-2-1 through TRAF-2-3. The potential effectiveness of mitigation measures for VMT has been estimated using the CAPCOA Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity20. It should be noted that the total 20 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity, December, 2021, https://www.airquality.org/ClimateChange/Documents/Final%20Handbook_AB434.pdf

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 29
project VMT includes discretionary VMT (commute VMT from employees) and mandatory VMT (truck trips). Mitigation measures TRAF-2-1 through TRAF-2-3 are identified to reduce the discretionary commute VMT from employees, which represents only a portion of the total project VMT.

Mitigation Measure TRAF-2-1: Based on the City of Roseville’s Transportation System Management (TSM) Ordinance, all businesses or common work locations (such as office building/complex, commercial/retail center, industrial building/park) with 50 or more employees are required to have a TSM Plan and designate a Site TSM Coordinator who serves as a liaison between the City of Roseville and employees/businesses at the site. The goals of the TSM Ordinance are to reduce vehicle emissions, vehicle miles traveled and traffic congestion, improve air quality and transportation efficiency. Accordingly, the proposed project shall implement a commute trip reduction program consistent with other trip reduction strategies in the City of Roseville,21 which would include the alternative transportation options as the following:
• Bicycling and walking,
• Carpooling,
• Flexible Work hours,
• Riding the bus to work,
• Vanpooling.

The CAPCOA Handbook Measure T-4 estimates that a voluntary commute trip reduction program can reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions commute VMT by up to 4.0 percent with full participation of all eligible employees.

Mitigation Measure TRAF-2-2: Provide an employee sponsored Vanpool program. The CAPCOA Handbook Measure T-10 estimates that provision of employee-sponsored vanpool can reduce GHG emissions from the commute VMT by up to 20.4 percent. Vanpooling is a flexible form of public transportation that provides groups of 5 to 15 people with a cost-effective and convenient rideshare option for commuting.

Mitigation Measure TRAF-2-3: Contribute to implementation of extending transit network coverage and hours in Roseville, including potential service to the Project area. Implementation of an expanded transit service would require both capital expenditures for support facilities, including construction of transit stops and facilitating extensions of future transit routes. The CAPCOA Handbook Measure T-24 estimates that extending transit network and coverage can reduce GHG emissions from VMT by up to 4.6 percent. Note that these VMT reductions would occur citywide and would not exclusively affect Project trips.

SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
VMT reduction depends on factors such as actual implementation of planned land use development, demographic change, the cost of fuel, infrastructure changes such as addition of bike lanes, and the competitiveness of transit relative to driving, which relates to congestion along vehicular commute routes that are not under the project’s jurisdiction, as well as transit provided by parties other than the project or the City of Roseville. 21 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/TSM/TSM%20Handbook%20- %20Section%20IV.pdf

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis CEQA Evaluation Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 30
The feasibility and effectiveness of the mitigation measures for the proposed project is unknown at this time, and even if implemented to the estimated percentages would not obtain the target VMT levels. The project cannot demonstrate definitively that implementation of these policies would achieve VMT reductions to meet the VMT per service population thresholds. Therefore, the VMT impact for the proposed project would remain significant and unavoidable.

TRAF-3 The proposed Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). (Finding: Less Than Significant) Hazards are typically assessed at the individual project level when an actual design and construction of a circulation facility is proposed. The potential impacts associated with the proposed project would be analyzed and evaluated in detail through the city review process when the design plans become available. The City’s Design and Construction Standards22 provide for coordinated and standardized development of city facilities, including roadways.

To provide access to the project site, Phillip Road would be improved from its current condition along the frontage of the project site and east to the westerly terminus of Blue Oaks Boulevard.

The improvements to Phillip Road are expected to reflect the City’s Street Geometric Requirements (Table 7-1 of the City of Roseville Design Standards), 48-foot right of way Collector/Industrial Street requirements, with sidewalk constructed along the north side.

The proposed project driveways will be required to follow the City’s design standards as they apply to, regulate, and guide the design and preparation of plans, and the construction of streets, highways, alleys, drainage, traffic signals, site access, and related public improvements.

The project will include a public driveway connecting to Phillip Road. Based on Section 5-4 of the City of Roseville’s Design Standards, “the number of driveways serving a parcel or site for land uses other than single family residential or duplex land uses, shall be minimized but not to a point that could cause local congestion within the public right-of-way. For projects requiring a Traffic study, the study shall evaluate the proposed site access for the project. The study shall discuss balancing the number of driveways for the project, so the number of driveways is minimized, while still providing enough access points to minimize congestion and delay.” The local transportation analysis for the proposed project includes analysis of the project driveways on Phillip Road in the Cumulative with Project scenario to confirm the geometry is appropriate to serve anticipated volumes.

Section 7-14 of the City of Roseville’s Design Standards requires that “all new driveways for Office/Commercial/Industrial land uses have a minimum throat width of 35 feet. The minimum width may be reduced to 25 feet if the driveway is a secondary access or restricted to right turn movements.” The City of Roseville will review the design and connection of new driveways and would ensure that the design and construction of new driveways would meet the City’s Design Standards and would not interfere with the movement of vehicles along existing roads.

The roadway connections to the project will meet the City’s design standards and does not include any unusual geometric designs or hazards. The project is located in an area that is 22 https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/development_services/engineering_land_development/construction_management _inspection/design_construction_standards

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 31
compatible with its surroundings for its use, bringing larger vehicles away from the urban areas of the City and providing separate access for larger vehicles to access the site. Therefore, potential impacts related to hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required.

TRAF-4 The proposed Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. (Finding: Less than Significant)
Emergency response requires a balance of emergency response time and evacuation needs with other community concerns, such as urban design and traffic calming. The proposed project would implement components of the roadway consistent with the City’s Design and Construction standards to ensure adequate emergency access is provided. The project does not create any constraints to access or evacuation along the roadway network. Therefore, impacts related to inadequate emergency access would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 32
Local Transportation Analysis
The local transportation analysis identifies the effects of the project on traffic operations in terms of vehicle delay and level of service (LOS), queuing issues and signal warrants.

Recommendations are provided for locations where traffic operations would be deficient relative to the City of Roseville standards.

ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES
The traffic operations analyses were conducted based on the methodologies described below.

Traffic Volumes
Traffic volumes for existing conditions were determined using intersection turn movement data collected at the study intersections in October 2024.

The opening year (2028) baseline conditions added the estimated trips generated by Phillip Road Site project to the existing counts.

The cumulative year (2040) baseline traffic volumes were based on projections developed by Fehr & Peers which used the city’s 2035 model and added the estimated trips generated by Philip Road Site project in 2028, assuming that the model represents buildout of all the planned developments in the study area, and that those would be completed by that time.

For both the opening year plus project and cumulative year plus project scenarios, projectgenerated traffic was added to the respective opening year scenario or cumulative year scenario’s traffic volumes.

Intersection Delay and Level of Service (LOS)
Level of service (LOS) describes the operating conditions experienced by motorists. LOS is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors, including speed and travel time, traffic interruptions and delay, freedom to maneuver, driving comfort, and convenience. LOS A through LOS F covers the entire range of traffic operations that might occur. Motorists using a facility that operates at a LOS A experience very little delay, while those using a facility that operates at a LOS F will experience long delays.

Table 4 presents the relationship of average delay to level of service for both signalized and unsignalized intersections.

The City of Roseville Design Standard Section 4 - Traffic Impact Studies (2023) contains standards to be used in conducting an intersection LOS analysis. The city requires the latest version of the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology to evaluate peak hour LOS at both signalized and unsignalized intersections. For signalized intersections or all-way stop-controlled intersections, the HCM procedure calculates a weighted average control delay in seconds per vehicle at a signalized intersection and assigns a level of service designation based upon the delay. For unsignalized two-way stop-controlled intersections, the HCM methodology calculates a weighted average control delay in seconds per vehicle for each controlled intersection leg; the LOS for the worst approach is used as the LOS performance measure.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 33
Study intersections were evaluated for the AM peak hour, occurring between 7-9 AM, and the PM peak hour, occurring between 4-6 PM. Intersection LOS for these peak hours is calculated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodologies as implemented by the Synchro traffic analysis software.

Table 4: Level of Service Definitions for Intersections LOS Description of Traffic Conditions
Signalized Intersection
Average Delay Per
Vehicle (Seconds)
Unsignalized
Intersection
Average Delay Per
Vehicle (Seconds)
A Free flowing. Most vehicles do not have
to stop.
≤10.0 ≤10.0
B Minimal delays. Some vehicles have to
stop, although waits are not
bothersome.
>10.0 and ≤20.0 >10.0 and ≤15.0
C Acceptable delays. Significant numbers
of vehicles have to stop because of
steady, high traffic volumes. Still, many
pass without stopping.
>20.0 and ≤35.0 >15.0 and ≤25.0
D Tolerable delays. Many vehicles have to
stop. Drivers are aware of heavier traffic.

Cars may have to wait through more
than one red light. Queues begin to
form, often on more than one
approach.
>35.0 and ≤55.0 >25.0 and ≤35.0
E Significant delays. Cars may have to
wait through more than one red light.

Long queues form, sometimes on
several approaches.
>55.0 and ≤80.0 >35.0 and ≤50.0
F Excessive delays. Intersection is jammed.

Many cars have to wait through more
than one red light, or more than 60
seconds. Traffic may back up into “upstream” intersections. >80.0 >50.0
Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (Washington D.C., 2022)

CITY OF ROSEVILLE LOS STANDARDS
Per the City of Roseville Traffic Impact Studies (2016), the peak hour design objective shall be a minimum intersection Level of Service (LOS) “C.” A comparison of LOS with and without project conditions shall be provided for all signalized intersections (both existing and future).

Intersections where LOS degrades from acceptable to unacceptable, as defined by the City’s current LOS policy, must be identified, along with feasible recommended improvements. An “impact” refers to a violation of the City’s intersection LOS policy, which requires maintaining a minimum LOS C at 70% or more of all signalized intersections and roadway segments during the PM peak hour, or causing an intersection operating at LOS “C” to degrade to worse than LOS C.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 34
Exceptions to the LOS C standard may be considered if the city determines that the necessary improvements are unacceptable based on established implementation criteria. Additionally, Pedestrian Districts may be exempt from the LOS standard.

Recommended Improvements
Intersection LOS without and with the project are compared for all analysis scenarios to determine operational deficiencies based on the LOS standards and criteria for the city. Where deficiencies were found, recommendations are made for changes to improve the intersection to a non-deficient condition, where improvements are feasible. Peak hour signal warrant analyses are conducted as necessary to assess whether an unsignalized intersection meets the peak hour signal warrant.

PROJECT TRAFFIC
Project-related trip estimates were calculated to assess the project’s potential impact on traffic operations for the roadway network.

Trip Generation
For the RRTO facilities, trucks are the primary trip generator and estimated based on the tonnage of materials being processed, including but not limited to collection vehicles, self-haul vehicles, and transfer trucks. The type of collection vehicles and the weights per load values were associated with the amount of tonnage to be processed to estimate likely trip generation, i.e., total daily trips, incoming and outgoing AM and PM peak hour trips. Based on the provided project description, the assumed payload for the refuse/recycling collection trucks is 9 tons and the assumed payload for the transfer/commodity shipment trucks is 20 tons. The annual truck trips for 2028 are 30,000 for refuse or recycling collection trucks and 13,500 for transfer or commodity shipment trucks. The annual truck trips for 2040 are 74,000 for refuse or recycling collection trucks and 33,000 for transfer or commodity shipment trucks. Since trucks are larger and less maneuverable than typical vehicles within the local circulation system, a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factor of 2 has been applied to the project trucks. The resulting number of trips would be used in the local transportation analysis. Additionally, the AM and PM peak hour rates were estimated based on a similar project in San Juan Capistrano, California, assuming AM and PM trips account for 10% of daily trips, respectively. The number of total facility throughout tons and the project annual truck trips are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Estimated Quantity of Annual Materials Managed at the RRTO and Project Annual Tributary Traffic for Materials Receipt and Removal
Year
Total Facility Throughput
Tons
Refuse or Recycling
Collection Trucks
Transfer or Commodity
Shipment Trucks
2028 270,000 30,000 13,500
2040 660,000 74,000 33,000
Based on the combined RRTO and EU Operations Facility Corporation Yard sizing efforts, the staffing levels, i.e., the number of employees by each construction phase are shown in Table 6.

As per the table, the net new employees to be accommodated at the proposed project would

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 35
be 439 (in 2028), and 531 (in 2040). The trips generated by the existing 165 employees at the Hilltop Circle Corporation Yard would be added to each of the analysis scenarios to establish total employees using the site.

For estimating the number of trips made by employees for the proposed project, Kittelson used the 12th Edition ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Code 710 (General office building) rates, shown in Table 7. Kittelson calculated the employee trip generation estimates for use in the local transportation analysis, they are shown in Table 8.

Table 6: Number of Employees during each phase of construction for combined RRTO and EU Operations Facility Corporation Yard
Functional Use Existing Conditions 2028 2058
MRF N/A 28 81
Transfer Station N/A 10 13
Future Potential Compost
Facility
N/A NA 13
Scale House N/A 5 8
Business Services and
Management
11 33 33
Technical Services 13 30 30
EU Fleet Services 19 37 37
Refuse and Stormwater Utility 61 138 138
Water Utility 61 148 148
Shared Spaces N/A N/A N/A
Vendor Lease Area N/A 10 30
TOTAL 165 439 531
Table 7: ITE Vehicle Trip Generation Rate for ITE Land Use Code 710: General Office Building for Weekday
ITE Land Use Code Unit Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
710 Employees 3.44 86% 14% 0.49 18% 82% 0.45
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition.

The truck trips and employee trips are combined to obtain the total number of daily trips generated by the project. As shown in Table 8, the proposed project is expected to generate 2,748 daily trips with 363 AM (289 inbound and 74 outbound) peak hour trips and 339 PM (83 inbound and 256 outbound) peak hour trips in the opening year of 2028. At full buildout in 2040, the project is expected to generate 4,040 daily trips with 506 AM (376 inbound and 130 outbound) peak hour trips and 478 PM (139 inbound and 339 outbound) peak hour trips.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 36
Table 8: Overall Vehicle Trip Generation Estimate (Based on ITE Land Use Code 710 for General Office Building) Source: * ITE Trip Generation Manual 12th Edition & Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition **AM and PM peak hour rates = 10% of daily trips (based on a similar project in San Juan Capistrano, California 23 Existing employees provided for informational purposes. 24 The employee estimates for RRTO facility and corporation yard include the existing and the proposed project employee estimates.

Land Use Unit Size
Week
day
Daily
Rate PCE
Weekday
Daily
Vehicle
Trips
Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour
Average
Rate
In% Out% In Out Total Average
Rate
In% Out% In Out Total
2024 Trip Generation23
General Office Building* Employees 165 3.44 N/A 568 0.49 86% 14% 70 11 81 0.45 18% 82% 13 61 74 2028 Trip Generation24
General Office Building* Employees 604 3.44 N/A 2,078 0.49 86% 14% 255 41 296 0.45 18% 82% 49 223 272 RRTO Facility and Corporation
Yard**
Truck Trips 335 - 2 670 0.10 50% 50% 34 33 67 0.10 50% 50% 34 33 67 Total Proposed Project Trips in 2028 2,748 289 74 363 83 256 339 2058 Trip Generation
General Office Building* Employees 696 3.44 N/A 2,394 0.49 86% 14% 293 48 341 0.45 18% 82% 56 257 313 RRTO Facility and Corporation
Yard**
Truck Trips 823 - 2 1,646 0.10 50% 50% 83 82 165 0.10 50% 50% 83 82 165 Total Proposed Project Trips in 2058 4,040 376 130 506 139 339 478

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 37
Trip Distribution
For the new proposed project trips, Kittelson considered the travel time comparison for travel between the project site using city roadways to state highway system, i.e., SR 65 and interstate 80 (I-80) when developing trip distribution. This was supplemented by information on the expected distribution of the proposed project trips using the City of Roseville base year (2020) travel demand model.

The trip distribution assumptions in the opening year and cumulative year are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively, include:
◼ Approximately 50 percent of trips would use Blue Oaks Boulevard to access SR 65 via the interchange. In the cumulative year, once Placer Parkway is built, 30 percent of trips would shift from Blue Oaks Boulevard to Placer Parkway to access SR 65. ◼ Approximately 5 percent would take Fiddyment Road to access SR 65. ◼ Approximately 30 percent would use Westbrook Boulevard to Pleasant Grove Boulevard, to either travel to/from the east on Pleasant Grove Boulevard to access I-80 or to/from the south on Fiddyment Road.
◼ Approximately 10 percent would use S Brewer Road to travel on Baseline Road to access SR-99 or I-80.
◼ The remaining 5 percent would remain within the area west of Fiddyment Road and south of Blue Oaks Boulevard.

The trip distribution for trucks generally follows a similar pattern, however, the truck routes being used today for these purposes and proposed project site driveways are considered for determining the truck trip assignment separately.

Study Scenarios
The LTA will examine traffic operations at study intersections for the following scenarios in the AM and PM peak hours:
◼ Existing Conditions
– Provides an overview of intersection operations as of October 2024, based on the turning movement counts collected at that time.
◼ Opening Year No Project Conditions (2028)
– Represents traffic conditions in the year 2028 assuming the Philip Road Site Project is built, but without project-generated traffic.
– Includes roadway improvements on Blue Oaks Boulevard and Phillip Road implemented after the traffic volumes were collected in October 2024. ◼ Opening Year Plus Project Conditions (2028)
– Evaluates how the transportation network will operate in 2028 with the proposed project. – Assumes the same lane configurations and traffic control measures as the Opening Year No Project scenario.
◼ Cumulative Year No Project Conditions (2040)
– Projects transportation network performance in 2040 based on area buildout, excluding project-generated traffic.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 38
– Reflects network changes identified in the Roseville Housing Element Synchro files developed by Fehr & Peers, as detailed in the Cumulative Year No Project Traffic Volume section.
◼ Cumulative Year Plus Project Conditions (2040)
– Assesses future transportation operations in 2040 with the proposed project in place. – Maintains the same lane configurations and traffic control types as the Cumulative No Project scenario.

1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr
\\kittelson.com\fs\H_Projects\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2.dwg Sep 18, 2024 - 5:44pm - kphan Layout Tab: Study Intersections Study Intersections 4 NTER 4 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr
\\kittelson.com\fs\H_Projects\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2.dwg Sep 18, 2024 - 5:44pm - kphan Layout Tab: Study Intersections Study Intersections 4 TER 4 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND Future Placer Parkway FUTURE PLACER PARKWAY TRIP DISTRIBUTION RATE 5
Cumulative Year
Trip Distribution
10% 5% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 20% 10% 30% 30% Cumulative Year Trip Distribution 8

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 41

EXISTING TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
Existing Traffic Volumes
Weekday intersection vehicle turning movement counts were collected during the AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods on Thursday, October 24, 2024, at the study intersections. The existing counts for the study intersections in the AM and PM peak hour are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively. The intersection turning movement count data are provided in Appendix C. The existing lane configurations and traffic control types are shown in Figure 11.

Existing Intersection Operations
Table 9 summarizes the operational performance of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours under existing conditions. Most of the intersections currently operate at LOS C or better during both AM and PM peak hours.

The signalized intersections operating at LOS D or worse in the AM peak hour are:
◼ Intersection 14: Fiddyment Road & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D ◼ Intersection 15: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D ◼ Intersection 17: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D ◼ Intersection 18: Washington Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E ◼ Intersection 19: Hallissy Drive/Gold Coast Drive & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D ◼ Intersection 20: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Roseville Parkway – LOS E ◼ Intersection 27: Fiddyment Road & Baseline Road – LOS D ◼ Intersection 28: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard/Cook Riolo Road & Baseline Road – LOS D The signalized intersections operating at LOS D or worse in the PM peak hour are:
◼ Intersection 17: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D ◼ Intersection 18: Washington Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D ◼ Intersection 20: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Roseville Parkway – LOS E ◼ Intersection 21: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Highland Pointe Drive – LOS D ◼ Intersection 27: Fiddyment Road & Baseline Road – LOS D ◼ Intersection 29: Foothills Boulevard & Baseline Road/Main Street – LOS D Additionally, each of the all-way stop-controlled intersections currently operate at LOS C or better. The LOS calculation sheets for existing conditions are shown in Appendix D.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 42
Table 9: Existing Traffic Operations
ID North-South Street East-West Street
Control
Type
Existing AM Existing PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1* Westbrook Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd AWSC1 0.44 A 0.37 A
2 Hayden Pkwy Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 22.0 C 15.7 B
3 Fiddyment Rd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 30.1 C 30.7 C
4 Diamond Creek
Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy
Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 29.5 C 10.2 B
5 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 30.6 C 19.5 B 6 Walgreens
Dwy/Roseville Pkwy
Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 8.9 A 7.9 A
7 New Meadow Dr Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 9.1 A 7.8 A
8 Foothills Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 26.8 C 33.4 C 9 Fidelity Wy Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 2.5 A 3.7 A
10 Washington Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 24.9 C 20.1 C 11 Santucci Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd AWSC2 8.0 A 7.6 A
12 Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 22.6 C 18.1 B 13 Market St Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 29.3 C 25.2 C 14 Fiddyment Rd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 49.7 D 34.0 C 15 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 54.1 D 34.1 C 16 Country Club Dr Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 11.0 B 6.6 A 17 Foothills Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 42.7 D 47.7 D 18 Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 59.9 E 50.5 D 19 Hallissy Dr/Gold Coast
Dr
Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 50.1 D 25.7 C
20 Pleasant Grove Blvd Roseville Pkwy Signalized 67.7 E 60.8 E 21 Pleasant Grove Blvd Highland Pointe Dr Signalized 31.1 C 35.4 D 22 Pleasant Grove Blvd SR 65 SB Ramps Signalized 10.9 B 8.9 A 23 Pleasant Grove Blvd SR 65 NB Ramps Signalized 13.8 B 14.5 B 24 Santucci Blvd/Watt
Ave
Baseline Rd Signalized 23.3 C 26.6 C
25 Westbrook Blvd Baseline Rd Signalized 21.6 C 12.2 B

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 43
ID North-South Street East-West Street
Control
Type
Existing AM Existing PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS
26 Market St/Stargazer Dr Baseline Rd Signalized 15.1 B 13.8 B 27 Fiddyment Rd Baseline Rd Signalized 35.9 D 37.3 D
28 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd/Cook Riolo Rd
Baseline Rd Signalized 37.5 D 34.6 C
29 Foothills Blvd Baseline Rd/Main St Signalized 32.2 C 38.4 D 30* Westbrook Blvd Brookstone Dr (North) AWSC 20.1 C 9.2 A 31* Westbrook Blvd Brookstone Dr (South) AWSC 14.1 B 9.5 A 32 Fiddyment Rd Parkland Wy/Angus Rd Signalized 18.0 B 18.0 B 33 Fiddyment Rd N Hayden Pkwy Signalized 23.8 C 15.9 B
34 Fiddyment Rd Crawford Pkwy/Old
Coach Dr
Signalized 34.2 C 16.2 B
35 Fiddyment Rd Hayden Pkwy Signalized 11.3 B 10.4 B
36 Fiddyment Rd Village Green Dr/Del
Webb Blvd
Signalized 18.5 B 19.7 B
Notes:
* These intersections were unsignalized when turning movement counts were collected in October 2024 but were signalized in early 2025. As a result, the existing conditions analysis does not reflect the updated signalization; however, the 2028 opening year scenarios will incorporate these changes.

AWSC = All-way stop control. Delay = Average vehicle delay in seconds 1 The HCM 7th Edition methodology for all-way stop-controlled intersections does not support configurations with more than three lanes per leg; therefore, LOS is reported based on the ICU method. 2 The HCM 7th Edition methodology for all-way stop-controlled intersections does not support configurations with more than three lanes per leg. However, since some movements have zero volume, lane configurations were modified to allow delay and LOS to be reported.
3 The study area includes a portion of all signalized intersections citywide.

Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:41pm - creynolds Layout Tab: Exist AM 1-20 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 9Figure 17 18 19 20 22 137
385
11 142
119 5855 247 3970
67 194
105
68 257
138 84 360 117 65265 56
62 403
371
51 562
405 61 40366 415 260 230
95 38
129
50 84
288 51 1464 141 46996 131
268
123
257
74 151
250 92 1513 207 205 815 73
21 11
150
18 15
51 31 1915 104 188 1035 33
42 376 33 2061 51226 140
162
84 413
24 50
130 82 1912 202 324 1299 240
35 1051 2320 277 91210
238
475
374
478
95 2017 356 306 638 141 4 5
36 185
111
55 297
265 50 18333 80140 119
19 87
128
68 118
106 76 59312 69286 37
190
558
445
69 806
163 77 719 276 292 193 83
132
397
208
113
577
338 82 1139 205 168 561 190
75 166 166347 90831
161
524
691
88 519
311 208 1484 138 375 625 134
161
611
232
199
559
121 246 1596 241 211 760 76
52 23
44 64
17 142 14 200110 21890 85
32 1090
1007
88 575
487 167 78239 428 246 353 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:41pm - creynolds Layout Tab: Exist AM 21-36 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 9Figure 265
1143
57 151
927
168 21418 149 31719
989
423
524
1065 8637 346
899
188
1280
101 296 297
41 59
285
53 134
29 8 29633 404 667 18
342
151 132 493 749 77
20 237
120
36 92 67 57033 11660 51
47 757
266
344
795
368 243 38942 209 309 217
36 147
56 59
119
198 43 67723 45500 142
346
994
68 120
947
94 144 283 560 96155 116
26 279
190
267 25175
148
252
18 322 49 160
32 392
54 7
213
23 17 11380 714858
158
395
18 22
337 4 10220 200 36328
95 636
15 18
844
10 288 267 5277
99 685
144
846 160 176
53 648
41 92
938
11 1272195 211210 22
989
423
524
1065 8637 346 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:42pm - creynolds Layout Tab: Exist PM 1-20 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 10 Figure 17 18 19 20 30 54
237 5
37 78 33239 228 3988
28 91
62 55
95 98 44 30443 71395 132
39 550
476
61 502
301 92 25337 674 472 444
237
28 363
196 39 133947 311821 246
338
124
208
59 79
160 121 1214 141 359 1656 209
46 10
130 9
12 26 37 145970 259 2064 30
26 180 27 1595 142320 319
289
44 366
90 196
374 66 1406 278 340 2312 124
95 932 2032 257 132028
5411
563
465
355
171 1932 259 313 1003 221 3 7
31 160
67 17
137
182 14 11925 86132 174
16 81
72 62
79 113 50 4479 69517 131
386
872
458
89 783
162 79 480 280 451 656 122
242
276
174
124
393
223 106 984 173 203 1138 226
41 100 137829 101 1539
283
488
590
153
882
420 150 1242 124 759 1232 180
190
377
287
312
685
163 248 1687 222 389 1600 95
387
44 203
57 13 202620 372069 80
46 1164
842
175
1277
544 274 53723 912 502 765 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:42pm - creynolds Layout Tab: Exist PM 21-36 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 10 Figure 381
1688
14 201
1495
100 40810 359 100 14118
1863
454
306
1690 1526 290
1570
446
1599
188 381 342
58 103
349
29 56
23 38 72049 292 458 33
135
113 224 886 640 121
27 248
65 29
71 86 86821 6676 92
51 816
252
319
843
300 370 43852 328 411 360
42 132
25 75
103
157 81 73427 36871 217
611
1114
72 172
1338
135 161 232 466 130 339 115
33 206
132
168 11833
146
203
19 185 3676
47 295
73 9
451
70 44045 626650
151
393
36 47
478 7 306 106 2256
170
792
54 30
773
10 20 115 4712
146
905
153
994 128 133
79 914
53 188
948
17 1382979 392620 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:39pm - creynolds Layout Tab: ELC and TCD Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control at Study Intersections (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 11 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:40pm - creynolds Layout Tab: ELC and TCD_2 Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control at Study Intersections (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 11 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 50

OPENING YEAR TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
The opening year is identified as 2028, when Phase 1 of the project will be constructed and operational. Phase 1 will include the initial phase of the RRTO building, consisting of a large multipurpose facility designed to handle all three waste streams (recyclables, municipal solid waste, and organic waste), along with an administration building to support RRTO employee and management needs. Phase 1 will also include the development of an entrance/exit scale plaza, an administration office with employee parking, and the Vendor Lease Area.

Opening Year No Project Traffic Volumes
Based on discussions with the city, the opening year no project scenario assumes existing traffic volumes plus traffic generated by the Phillip Road Site Project, located at 6382 Phillip Road, approximately two miles east of the Roseville EU Operations Center project site. The Phillip Road Site Project is a mixed-use industrial development that includes manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution uses. The site will be internally connected by a bridge spanning Pleasant Grove Creek and the Pleasant Grove Creek Bypass Channel. The project also includes parks, utility extensions, and roadway improvements along Blue Oaks Boulevard and Phillip Road. Off-site roadway connections will be provided via Blue Oaks Boulevard and Benchmark Drive.

Trip generation for the Phillip Road Site Project was estimated using ITE land use trip generation rates, with the detailed land use breakdown and trip generation calculations provided in Appendix E. The trip distribution assumptions are consistent with the draft environmental impact report that Ascent provided in February 2023 related to this project). 25 Project-generated trips
were added to existing volumes to establish the opening year no project scenario volumes at each study intersection during the AM and PM peak hours, as shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13, respectively.

This scenario reflects the roadway improvements on Blue Oaks Boulevard and Phillip Road, including the signalization of the intersections along Westbrook Boulevard at Blue Oaks Boulevard and Brookstone Drive, which were implemented after the turning movement counts were collected in October 2024. The lane configurations and traffic control types at the study intersections under opening year conditions are illustrated in Figure 14.

Opening Year No Project Intersection Operations
Table 10 summarizes the operational performance of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours under opening year no project conditions. With the planned lane configurations and traffic volumes for the opening year, 9 of the 32 signalized intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or worse during the AM peak hour, and 8 are projected to operate at LOS D or worse during the PM peak hour.

The signalized intersections operating at LOS D or worse in the AM peak hour are:
◼ Intersection 12: Westbrook Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (from LOS C in the existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 14: Fiddyment Road & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
25 Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Panattoni Project by Ascent, February 2023.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 51
◼ Intersection 15: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E (from LOS D in the existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 17: Foothill Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 18: Washington Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 19: Hallissy Drive/Gold Coast Drive & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 20: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Roseville Parkway – LOS E (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 27: Fiddyment Road & Baseline Road – LOS D (same as existing conditions) ◼ Intersection 28: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard/Cook Riolo Road & Baseline Road – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
The signalized intersections operating at LOS D or worse in the PM peak hour are:
◼ Intersection 8: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (from LOS C in the existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 10: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (from LOS C in the existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 14: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 17: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 18: Washington Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 20: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Roseville Parkway – LOS E (same as existing conditions)
◼ Intersection 27: Fiddyment Road & Baseline Road – LOS D (same as existing conditions) ◼ Intersection 29: Foothills Boulevard & Baseline Road/Main Street – LOS D (same as existing conditions)
The LOS calculation sheets for opening year no project conditions are shown in Appendix F.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 52
Table 10: Opening Year No Project Traffic Operations
ID Intersection
Existing
Control
Type
Existing AM Existing PM
Opening
Year
Proposed
Control
Type
Opening Year
No Project AM
Opening
Year No
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Westbrook Blvd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
AWSC1 0.44 A 0.37 A Signalized 32.6 C 22.5 C
2 Hayden Pkwy &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 22.0 C 15.7 B Signalized 20.4 C 14.7 B
3 Fiddyment Rd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 30.1 C 30.7 C Signalized 32.7 C 32.1 C
4 Diamond Creek
Blvd/Prairie
Woods Wy & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 29.5 C 10.2 B Signalized 30.3 C 10.4 B
5 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd & Blue Oaks
Blvd
Signalized 30.6 C 19.5 B Signalized 22.9 C 18.0 B
6 Walgreens
Dwy/Roseville
Pkwy & Blue Oaks
Blvd
Signalized 8.9 A 7.9 A Signalized 8.2 A 7.4 A
7 New Meadow Dr
& Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 9.1 A 7.8 A Signalized 8.9 A 8.0 A
8 Foothills Blvd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 26.8 C 33.4 C Signalized 27.5 C 36.4 D
9 Fidelity Wy & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 2.5 A 3.7 A Signalized 2.6 A 3.8 A
10 Washington Blvd
& Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 24.9 C 20.1 C Signalized 24.2 C 40.9 D
11 Santucci Blvd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
AWSC2 8.0 A 7.6 A Signalized 7.8 A 12.2 B
12 Westbrook Blvd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 22.6 C 18.1 B Signalized 52.9 D 30.1 C
13 Market St &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 29.3 C 25.2 C Signalized 32.1 C 26.6 C
14 Fiddyment Rd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 49.9 D 34.0 C Signalized 52.4 D 48.2 D
15 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd & Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Signalized 54.1 D 34.1 C Signalized 56.5 E 30.9 C
16 Country Club Dr
& Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 11.0 B 6.6 A Signalized 11.0 B 6.7 A

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 53
ID Intersection
Existing
Control
Type
Existing AM Existing PM
Opening
Year
Proposed
Control
Type
Opening Year
No Project AM
Opening
Year No
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
17 Foothill Blvd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 42.7 D 47.7 D Signalized 42.8 D 48.0 D
18 Washington Blvd
& Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 59.9 E 50.5 D Signalized 61.7 E 52.0 D
19 Hallissy Dr/Gold
Coast Dr &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 50.1 D 25.7 C Signalized 52.3 D 26.5 C
20 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & Roseville
Pkwy
Signalized 67.7 E 60.8 E Signalized 68.1 E 58.2 E
21 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & Highland
Pointe Dr
Signalized 26.7 C 28.1 C Signalized 26.5 C 28.2 C
22 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & SR 65 SB
Ramps
Signalized 8.2 A 5.9 A Signalized 8.1 A 5.9 A
23 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & SR 65 NB
Ramps
Signalized 13.8 B 14.5 B Signalized 13.6 B 14.4 B
24 Santucci
Blvd/Watt Ave &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 23.3 C 26.6 C Signalized 23.3 C 26.6 C
25 Westbrook Blvd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 21.6 C 12.2 B Signalized 21.6 C 12.2 B
26 Market
St/Stargazer Dr &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 15.1 B 13.8 B Signalized 15.1 B 13.8 B
27 Fiddyment Rd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 35.9 D 37.3 D Signalized 45.9 D 48.6 D
28 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd/Cook Riolo
Rd & Baseline Rd
Signalized 37.5 D 34.6 C Signalized 37.5 D 34.3 C
29 Foothills Blvd &
Baseline Rd/Main
St
Signalized 32.2 C 38.4 D Signalized 32.2 C 38.4 D
30 Westbrook Blvd &
Brookstone Dr
(North)
AWSC 20.1 C 9.2 A Signalized 10.4 B 7.2 A
31 Westbrook Blvd &
Brookstone Dr
(South)
AWSC 14.1 B 9.5 A Signalized 11.4 B 8.3 A

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 54
ID Intersection
Existing
Control
Type
Existing AM Existing PM
Opening
Year
Proposed
Control
Type
Opening Year
No Project AM
Opening
Year No
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
32 Fiddyment Rd &
Parkland
Wy/Angus Rd
Signalized 18.0 B 18.0 B Signalized 18.0 B 18.1 B
33 Fiddyment Rd &
N Hayden Pkwy
Signalized 23.8 C 15.9 B Signalized 26.6 C 17.3 B
34 Fiddyment Rd &
Crawford
Pkwy/Old Coach
Dr
Signalized 34.2 C 16.2 B Signalized 33.0 C 16.3 B
35 Fiddyment Rd &
Hayden Pkwy
Signalized 11.3 B 10.4 B Signalized 11.5 B 10.7 B
36 Fiddyment Rd &
Village Green
Dr/Del Webb
Blvd
Signalized 18.5 B 19.7 B Signalized 18.7 B 19.8 B
AWSC = All-way stop control. Delay = Average vehicle delay in seconds 1 The HCM 7th Edition methodology for all-way stop-controlled intersections does not support configurations with more than three lanes per leg; therefore, LOS is reported based on the ICU method. 2 The HCM 7th Edition methodology for all-way stop-controlled intersections does not support configurations with more than three lanes per leg. However, since some movements have zero volume, lane configurations were modified to allow delay and LOS to be reported.
3 The study area includes a portion of all signalized intersections citywide.

Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2025

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:44pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 No Project AM 1-20 Opening Year No Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 12 Figure 17 18 19 20 32 1111
1007
88 599
487 167 78239 428 246 353
52 23
44 64
17 142 14 202210 21914 85
332
582
445
69 827
163 77 740 403 292 217 83
19 87
128
68 118
106 76 74112 69452 37
161
611
232
199
559
121 246 1617 241 211 784 76
161
524
691
88 519
311 208 1505 138 375 649 134
75 166 168447 90855
132
397
208
113
577
338 82 1160 205 168 585 190
36 185
111
55 297
421 50 18333 80140 295 4 5
238
475
374
478
95 2165 356 306 804 141
35 1051 2468 277 91376
186
84 413
24 50
130 82 2060 223 324 1465 240
95 38
129
50 84
288 51 1654 141 461210 131
42 376 33 2230 1416 140
81 403
371
98 562
405 103 59383 415 474 230
21 11
150
18 15
51 31 2084 104 188 1225 33
72 194
105
68 257
138 84 609 121 65545 56
292
123
257
74 151
250 92 1682 228 205 1005 73
202
137
385
11 142
119 0 320 215 247 333 70 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:45pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 No Project AM 21-36 Opening Year No Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 12 Figure 95 678
15 18
891
10 288 267 5277
179
416
18 22
361 4 10220 224 36328
53 672
41 92
959
11 1272195 211210
104
704
144
863 160 180
32 413
54 7
237
23 17 11380 714858
148
428
18 478 49 160
26 455
194
423 25675
346
994
68 120
947
94 144 283 560 96155 116
36 147
56 59
119
198 43 67723 45500 142
41 59
285
53 134
29 8 29633 404 667 18
47 923
266
344
943
368 243 38942 209 309 217
920
188
1304
101 296 297
20 237
120
36 92 67 57033 11660 51
342
151 132 493 749 77
265
1164
57 151
951
168 21418 149 31719 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 989
423
524
1065 8637 346

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:46pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 No Project PM 1-20 Opening Year No Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 13 Figure 17 18 19 20 46 1195
842
175
1304
544 274 53723 912 502 765
387
44 203
57 13 205720 372096 80
549
899
458
89 814
162 79 511 468 451 683 122
16 81
72 62
79 113 50 6679 69707 131
190
377
287
312
685
163 248 1718 222 389 1627 95
283
488
590
153
882
420 150 1273 124 759 1259 180
41 100 140929 101 1566
242
276
174
124
393
223 106 1015 173 203 1165 226
31 160
67 17
137
414 14 11925 86132 375 3 7
541
563
465
355
171 2152 259 313 1193 221
95 932 2252 257 132218
316
44 366
90 196
374 66 1626 309 340 2502 124
237
28 363
196 39 162247 312065 246
26 180 27 1846 2537 319
61 550
476
115
502
301 155 53662 674 716 444
46 10
130 9
12 26 37 171070 259 2281 30
33 91
62 55
95 98 44 67549 71715 132
365
124
208
59 79
160 121 1465 172 359 1873 209
236
54 237 5
37 78 3 421 278 228 375 88 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:46pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 No Project PM 21-36 Opening Year No Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 13 Figure 170
855
54 30
827
10 200 115 4712
182
424
36 47
505 7 306 133 2256
79 941
53 188
979
17 1382979 392620
151
927
153
1019 128 139
47 326
73 9
478
70 44045 626650
146
404
19 417 3676
33 407
138
400 12333
611
1114
72 172
1338
135 161 232 466 130 339 115
42 132
25 75
103
157 81 73427 36871 217
58 103
349
29 56
23 38 72049 292 458 33
51 1006
252
319
1063
300 370 43852 328 411 360
1601
446
1626
188 381 342
27 248
65 29
71 86 86821 6676 92
135
113 224 886 640 121
381
1719
14 201
1522
100 40810 359 100 14118 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 381
1719
14 201
1522
100 40810 359 100 14118

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:38pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 LC and TCD Opening Year Lane Configuration and Traffic Control at Study Intersections (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 14 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:39pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 LC and TCD_2 Opening Year Lane Configuration and Traffic Control at Study Intersections (Intersections 21-38) Roseville, CA 14 Figure 38 37 37 38 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 61
Opening Year Plus Project Traffic Volumes
The opening year plus project conditions combine the opening year no project volumes with the project-generated volumes, which are estimated based on the trip generation and trip distribution assumptions for Phase 1 described in the sections above.

The opening year plus project traffic operations are evaluated for AM and PM peak hours. This scenario assumes the opening year no project intersection lane configurations and traffic control types. The opening year plus project volumes for the study intersections in the AM and PM peak hour are shown in Figure 15 and Figure 16, respectively. The lane configurations and traffic control types under opening year plus project conditions are the same as those under the no project scenario, shown in Figure 14.

Opening Year Plus Project Intersection Operations
Table 11 summarizes the operational performance of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours under opening year plus project conditions. Most of the intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during both AM and PM peak hours.

All intersections are expected to maintain the same level of service (LOS) as under the no project scenario, with two exceptions:
◼ Intersection 3 (Fiddyment Road & Blue Oaks Boulevard) is projected to degrade from LOS C to LOS D during the PM peak hour.
◼ Intersection 12 (Westbrook Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard) is also expected to degrade from LOS C to LOS D during the PM peak hour.

The unsignalized passenger vehicle driveway intersection is expected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour. The unsignalized truck driveway intersection is expected to operate at LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour. Improvements to address the impacts caused by project traffic are discussed in the Improvement Recommendations section.

The LOS calculation sheets for opening year plus project conditions are provided in Appendix G.

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:47pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 With Project AM 1-20 Opening Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 15 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 289
137
385
11 142
119 364 237 247 506 70
72 194
105
68 257
138 84 653 121 65718 56
95 403
371
112
562
405 107 63087 415 619 230
95 38
129
50 84
288 51 1691 141 461355 131
306
123
257
74 151
250 92 1715 232 205 1135 73
21 11
150
18 15
51 31 2117 104 188 1355 33
42 376 33 2263 51546 140
200
84 413
24 50
130 82 2090 227 324 1581 240
35 1051 2498 277 91492
238
475
374
478
95 2195 356 306 920 141 4 5
36 243
111
55 312
428 50 18333 80140 324
19 87
128
68 118
106 76 74812 69481 37
332
582
445
69 827
163 77 747 403 292 246 83
132
397
208
113
577
338 82 1167 205 168 614 190
75 166 169147 90884
161
524
691
88 519
311 208 1512 138 375 678 134
161
611
232
199
559
121 246 1624 241 211 813 76
52 23
44 64
17 142 14 202910 21943 85
32 1115
1011
88 613
487 167 78239 442 246 353

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:47pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 With Project AM 21-36 Opening Year Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-38) Roseville, CA 15 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 37 38 3 30 3 561 550 31 4
37 26 565 577 230
265
1168
57 151
965
168 21418 149 31719
1014
423
524
1103 8637 346
924
188
1318
101 296 297
41 59
314
53 134
29 8 29633 411 667 18
349
158 161 493 749 106
20 237
120
36 92 67 57733 11689 51
61 923
266
344
943
368 243 39346 209 323 217
36 147
56 59
119
198 43 68123 45514 142
346
994
68 120
947
94 144 287 560 96169 116
26 542
194
445 25675
148
515
18 500 49 160
32 417
54 7
251
23 17 11380 714858
179
420
18 22
375 4 10220 224 36328
95 682
15 18
905
10 288 267 5277
104
718
144
867 160 180
53 686
41 92
963
11 1272195 211210

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:48pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 With Project PM 1-20 Opening Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 16 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 261
54 237 5
37 78 3 575 355 228 425 88
33 91
62 55
95 98 44 82949 71765 132
65 550
476
119
502
301 168 66475 674 758 444
237
28 363
196 39 175047 312107 246
369
124
208
59 79
160 121 1580 185 359 1910 209
46 10
130 9
12 26 37 182570 259 2318 30
26 180 27 1961 142574 319
320
44 366
90 196
374 66 1728 322 340 2535 124
95 932 2354 257 132251
5411
563
465
355
171 2254 259 313 1226 221 3 7
31 177
67 17
137
440 14 11925 86132 383
16 81
72 62
79 113 50 6939 69715 131
549
899
458
89 814
162 79 537 468 451 691 122
242
276
174
124
393
223 106 1041 173 203 1173 226
41 100 143529 101 1574
283
488
590
153
882
420 150 1299 124 759 1267 180
190
377
287
312
685
163 248 1744 222 389 1635 95
387
44 203
57 13 208320 372104 80
46 1208
855
175
1308
544 274 53723 916 502 765

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:48pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2028 With Project PM 21-36 Opening Year Plus Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-38) Roseville, CA 16 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 37 38 3 30 3 707 638 31
22 201 5 732 647 44
381
1732
14 201
1526
100 40810 359 100 14118
1907
454
306
1721 1526 290
1614
446
1630
188 381 342
58 103
357
29 56
23 38 72049 318 458 33
161
139 232 886 640 129
27 248
65 29
71 86 89421 6684 92
55 1006
252
319
1063
300 370 45165 328 415 360
42 132
25 75
103
157 81 74727 36875 217
611
1114
72 172
1338
135 161 245 466 130 343 115
33 432
138
477 12333
146
429
19 494 3676
47 339
73 9
482
70 44045 626650
182
437
36 47
509 7 306 133 2256
170
868
54 30
831
10 20 115 4712
151
931
153
1032 128 139
79 945
53 188
992
17 1382979 392620

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 66
Table 11: Opening Year Plus Project Traffic Operations
ID Intersection
Proposed
Control
Type
Opening Year
No Project AM
Opening
Year No
Project PM
Opening Year
Plus Project
AM
Opening
Year Plus
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Westbrook Blvd
& Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 32.6 C 22.5 C 34.2 C 28.3 C
2 Hayden Pkwy &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 20.4 C 14.7 B 21.6 C 16.3 B
3 Fiddyment Rd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 32.7 C 32.1 C 33.1 C 39.2 D
4 Diamond Creek
Blvd/Prairie
Woods Wy &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 30.3 C 10.4 B 30.3 C 14 B
5 Woodcreek
Oaks Blvd & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 22.9 C 18.0 B 23.1 C 19.9 B
6 Walgreens
Dwy/Roseville
Pkwy & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 8.2 A 7.4 A 8.0 A 7.2 A
7 New Meadow
Dr & Blue Oaks
Blvd
Signalized 8.9 A 8.0 A 9.0 A 8.7 A
8 Foothills Blvd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 27.5 C 36.4 D 27.8 C 42.0 D
9 Fidelity Wy &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 2.6 A 3.8 A 2.6 A 4.1 A
10 Washington Blvd
& Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 24.2 C 40.9 D 23.8 C 45.2 D
11 Santucci Blvd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
AWSC2 7.8 A 12.2 B 19.7 B 19.3 B
12 Westbrook Blvd
& Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Signalized 52.9 D 30.1 C 54.9 D 40.2 D
13 Market St &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 32.1 C 26.6 C 32.2 C 29.7 C
14 Fiddyment Rd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 52.4 D 48.2 D 52.4 D 49.4 D

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 67
ID Intersection
Proposed
Control
Type
Opening Year
No Project AM
Opening
Year No
Project PM
Opening Year
Plus Project
AM
Opening
Year Plus
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
15 Woodcreek
Oaks Blvd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 56.5 E 30.9 C 56.8 E 33.4 C
16 Country Club Dr
& Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Signalized 11.0 B 6.7 A 11.0 B 7.0 A
17 Foothills Blvd &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 42.8 D 48.0 D 42.7 D 53.7 D
18 Washington Blvd
& Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Signalized 61.7 E 52.0 D 62.2 E 54.9 D
19 Hallissy Dr/Gold
Coast Dr &
Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 52.3 D 26.5 C 52.7 D 29.7 C
20 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & Roseville
Pkwy
Signalized 68.1 E 58.2 E 68.1 E 60.9 E
21 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & Highland
Pointe Dr
Signalized 26.5 C 28.2 C 26.4 C 29.1 C
22 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & SR 65 SB
Ramps
Signalized 8.1 A 5.9 A 8.0 A 6.0 A
23 Pleasant Grove
Blvd & SR 65 NB
Ramps
Signalized 13.6 B 14.4 B 13.6 B 14.8 B
24 Santucci
Blvd/Watt Ave &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 23.3 C 26.6 C 23.6 C 29.4 C
25 Westbrook Blvd
& Baseline Rd
Signalized 21.6 C 12.2 B 23.7 C 14.0 B
26 Market
St/Stargazer Dr
& Baseline Rd
Signalized 15.1 B 13.8 B 15.2 B 14.5 B
27 Fiddyment Rd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 45.9 D 48.6 D 46.7 D 52.0 D

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 68
ID Intersection
Proposed
Control
Type
Opening Year
No Project AM
Opening
Year No
Project PM
Opening Year
Plus Project
AM
Opening
Year Plus
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
28 Woodcreek
Oaks Blvd/Cook
Riolo Rd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 37.5 D 34.3 C 37.7 D 34.7 C
29 Foothills Blvd &
Baseline
Rd/Main St
Signalized 32.2 C 38.4 D 32.4 C 39.2 D
30 Westbrook Blvd
& Brookstone Dr
(North)
Signalized 10.4 B 7.2 A 10.4 B 7.7 A
31 Westbrook Blvd
& Brookstone Dr
(South)
Signalized 11.4 B 8.3 A 11.2 B 9.0 A
32 Fiddyment Rd &
Parkland
Wy/Angus Rd
Signalized 18.0 B 18.1 B 18.0 B 19 B
33 Fiddyment Rd &
N Hayden Pkwy
Signalized 26.6 C 17.3 B 26.9 C 21.9 C
34 Fiddyment Rd &
Crawford
Pkwy/Old
Coach Dr
Signalized 33.0 C 16.3 B 33.7 C 21.3 C
35 Fiddyment Rd &
Hayden Pkwy
Signalized 11.5 B 10.7 B 11.5 B 11.4 B
36 Fiddyment Rd &
Village Green
Dr/Del Webb
Blvd
Signalized 18.7 B 19.8 B 18.7 B 21.6 C
37 Phillip Road &
Passenger
Vehicle
Driveway
TWSC1- - - - 37.6 E 431.3 F
38 Phillip Road &
Truck Driveway
TWSC1- - - - 26.1 D 37.6 E
Notes:

AWSC = All-way stop control. TWSC = Two-way stop control. Delay = Average vehicle delay in seconds Bold = Deficient (causing an intersection operating at LOS C to operate at worse than LOS C) 1The reported delay reflects the worst-performing approach at the two-way stop controlled intersection 2 The study area includes a portion of all signalized intersections citywide.

Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 69

SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
A signal warrant analysis was conducted for peak hour study periods using the procedures outlined in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The Peak Hour Signal Warrant is intended to determine where traffic conditions suggest that, for at least one hour of an average day, minor-street traffic experiences undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. Peak Hour Signal Warrant analyses were conducted for two project driveway intersections under opening year conditions, which are one lane per direction on all roads. Figure 17 presents the warrant analysis results for the intersection of Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway, while Figure 18 shows the findings for the intersection of Phillip Road and the Truck Driveway. The plotted point, representing the total vehicles per hour on Phillip Road (both approaches combined) and the vehicles per hour on the Passenger Vehicle Driveway approach, falls above the applicable curve for the combination of approach lanes.

Therefore, the intersection at Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway meets the peak hour signal warrant under cumulative plus project conditions, whereas the intersection at Phillip Road and the Truck Driveway does not meet the warrant criteria.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 70
Figure 17: Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis for Intersection of Phillip Road and Passenger Vehicle Driveway
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026
Figure 18: Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis for Intersection of Phillip Road and Truck Driveway Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026
1384, 223
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Higher Minor Street
Combined Major Street
Warrant #3 - Peak Hour
100% Warrant Factor
1 Major / 1 Minor
Traffic Volumes
1348, 33 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Higher Minor Street
Combined Major Street
Warrant #3 - Peak Hour
100% Warrant Factor
1 Major / 1 Minor
Traffic Volumes

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 71

IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations for lane modifications and traffic control changes are provided to address operational deficiencies under opening year plus project conditions. Table 12 lists the recommended improvements for opening year traffic associated with the development of Phase 1 of the Roseville EU Operations Center Project. Table 13 shows the traffic operational changes with and without the recommended improvements.

For the intersection of Fiddyment Road and Blue Oaks Boulevard, an overlap phase to provide northbound right-turn movements with a green arrow during westbound left-turns was analyzed and found to improve operations to LOS C for the PM peak. However, this would restrict westbound U-turns which currently are desired to maintain circulation for the larger roadway network. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and this location would degrade to LOS D during the PM peak hour. For the intersection of Westbrook Boulevard and Pleasant Grove Boulevard, adding an additional southbound left turn lane is found to improve traffic operations to LOS C during the PM peak hour.

It is recommended that a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Phillip Road and Passenger Vehicle Driveway. With these improvements, the intersection of Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway is expected to improve from LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour to LOS A during both peak hours. Since the intersection of Phillip Road and the Truck Driveway does not meet signal warrant criteria, no feasible improvement is identified to improve its operations.

The synchro operational result reports for opening year plus project conditions with improvements are shown in Appendix H.

Table 12: Recommended Improvements
ID Intersection Lane Changes
Traffic Control
Change
3 Fiddyment Rd & Blue Oaks Blvd No feasible improvements are identified at this location
12 Westbrook Blvd & Pleasant Grove Blvd Add an additional southbound left turn lane
None
37 Phillip Road & Passenger Vehicle Driveway None Add a signal 38 Phillip Road & Truck Driveway No feasible improvements are identified at this location

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 72
Table 13: Intersection Operations with Recommended Improvements – Opening Year Plus Project ID Intersection
Peak
Hour
Opening
Year Plus
Project
Recommended Improvements
Opening Year
Plus Project
With
Improvement
Delay LOS Delay LOS
12 Westbrook
Blvd &
Pleasant
Grove Blvd
AM 54.9 D Add an additional southbound
left turn lane

38.4 D
PM 40.2 D 27.3 C
37 Phillip Road
& Passenger
Vehicle
Driveway
AM 37.6 E Add a signal 9.3 A
PM 431.1 F 16.5 A
Table 14: 95th percentile queues Results with Recommended Improvements – Opening Year Plus Project
# Intersection
Cumulative
Plus Project
Scenario
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

L R L R L R L R
1 2
Westbrook
Blvd &
Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Planned
Storage
240 250 240 250 240 250 240 250
AM 53 0 75 29 84 35 292 6
PM 21 0 80 25 78 0 301 0
The results are as follows:
◼ As shown in Table 13, the recommended roadway improvements would provide acceptable operations (LOS C or better) at the intersection of Westbrook Boulevard and Pleasant Grove Boulevard in the PM peak hour but it doesn’t change the LOS in the AM peak hour.
◼ The intersection of Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway is expected to improve to LOS A during the both peak hours.
◼ As shown in Table 14, the 95th percentile queue analysis indicates that all queues can be accommodated within the planned storage lengths, with the exception of the southbound left-turn movements at Westbrook Boulevard and Pleasant Grove Boulevard. These queues are expected to be contained within the taper lengths and are not anticipated to interfere with through traffic.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 73

CUMULATIVE YEAR TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
Cumulative conditions refer to the full buildout of the project and the surrounding area, anticipated by the year 2040. To represent cumulative conditions with the project, the full trip generation associated with the Roseville EU Operations Center Project was added to the cumulative no project volumes.

Cumulative No Project Traffic Volumes
Cumulative no project traffic volumes were obtained from the Roseville Housing Element Synchro files developed by Fehr & Peers. These volumes were based on the City's 2035 travel demand model, which assumes the Phillip Road Site Project is not developed. The trips generated by the Phillip Road Site Project were then added to these volumes. The resulting cumulative volumes for the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figure 19 and Figure 20, respectively.

Cumulative no project traffic operations were evaluated for both the AM and PM peak hours.

This scenario uses the intersection lane configurations and traffic control types identified in the Roseville Housing Element Synchro files and changes compared to existing conditions are attached in Appendix I. The proposed lane configurations and traffic control types are illustrated in Figure 21.

Cumulative No Project Intersection Operations
Table 17 summarizes the operations of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours under Cumulative No Project conditions. With the proposed lane configurations and traffic volumes, all intersections are expected to be signalized, with 19 intersections projected to operate at LOS D or worse during the AM peak hour and the PM peak hour.

The signalized intersections operating at LOS D or worse in the AM peak hour are:
• Intersection 1: Westbrook Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 3: Fiddyment Road and Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS E • Intersection 4: Diamond Creek Boulevard/Prairie Woods Way & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS D
• Intersection 5: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 8: Foothills Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 10: Washington Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 12: Westbrook Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E • Intersection 13: Market Street & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 14: Fiddyment Road & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 15: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E • Intersection 17: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E • Intersection 18: Washington Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 19: Hallissy Drive/Gold Coast Drive & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 20: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Roseville Parkway – LOS F • Intersection 24: Santucci Boulevard/Watt Avenue & Baseline Road – LOS D • Intersection 25: Westbrook Boulevard & Baseline Road – LOS E • Intersection 27: Fiddyment Road & Baseline Road – LOS E

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 74
• Intersection 28: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard/Cook Riolo Road & Baseline Road – LOS F • Intersection 29: Foothills Boulevard & Baseline Road/Main Street – LOS E The signalized intersections operating at LOS D or worse in the PM peak hour are:
• Intersection 1: Westbrook Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 3: Fiddyment Road and Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 4: Diamond Creek Boulevard/Prairie Woods Way & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F
• Intersection 5: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 8: Foothills Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 10: Washington Boulevard & Blue Oaks Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 13: Market Street & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 14: Fiddyment Road & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS F • Intersection 15: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 17: Foothills Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E • Intersection 18: Washington Boulevard & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS E • Intersection 19: Hallissy Drive/Gold Coast Drive & Pleasant Grove Boulevard – LOS D • Intersection 20: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Roseville Parkway – LOS F • Intersection 21: Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Highland Pointe Drive – LOS E • Intersection 24: Santucci Boulevard/Watt Avenue & Baseline Road – LOS E • Intersection 25: Westbrook Boulevard & Baseline Road – LOS D • Intersection 27: Fiddyment Road & Baseline Road – LOS E • Intersection 28: Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard/Cook Riolo Road & Baseline Road – LOS F • Intersection 29: Foothills Boulevard & Baseline Road/Main Street – LOS E The LOS calculation sheets for cumulative no project conditions are shown in Appendix J.

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:56pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 No Project AM 1-20 Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 19 Figure 17 18 19 20 26 1365
1060
256
854
889 216 140824 590 1049 497
55 76
38 28
28 163 14 243724 401138 125
408
1418
966
77 1141
152 159 760 644 608 470 76
56 122
204
101
277
54 113 103613 120 626 181
317
846
294
304
654
68 228 2211 295 159 1019 67
180
993
740
132
441
185 502 1768 175 561 934 164
103
232 2323 141 116 1163
131
909
522
243
448
385 141 1572 202 200 911 220
39 1081
54 79
934
793 103 50218 97306 495
330
711
62 5
323
72 5 460 580 109 254 62
189
622
442
766
112 3164 329 663 1057 388
60 1710 3433 350 751613
360
584
350
63 578
702 229 2943 612 516 1713 868
34 28
114
53 39
480 77 276768 821232 156 555
375
248 15 36935 051954 75
56 1104
503
162
912
294 269 1460 120 354 596 157
18 13
120 6615 2 357810 221905 69
42 108
138
118
105
292 60 142734 84586 43
203
588
460
82 265
316 123 2814 424 250 1185 494
202
677
587
69 897
443 59 595 209 264 384 136 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:56pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 No Project AM 21-36 Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 19 Figure 92 1488
21 23
1175
11 1022 260 42611
213
1482
81 28
838
25 866 280 77416
62 1506
46 65
1336
32 12917 120 243326
105
1414
153
1283 248 189 5
1576
44 26
585
37 76895 7739100
17 1332
10 1397 4750
58 1322
110
1283 210 125
439
1427
60 128
1090
66 179 452 946 55294 84
232
451
82 302
88 264 222 1347 124 50818 167
69 803
320
562
899
99 424 149462 596 1519 35
237
1275
251
1006
892
459 546 1377 105 276 1037 311
1166
371
1471
245 823 1085
212
63 12
105
120
161 12 1923 163 71916 98
1385
409
386
1908 152 577
37 536
548
632
695
275 461 124811 289 1483 179
215
1896
22 202
1836
347 2574 144 44249 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:57pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 No Project PM 1-20 Cumulative No Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 20 Figure 17 18 19 20 40 1291
770
280
1517
730 390 96030 1110 1170 820
350
80 30
20 30
70 20 205120 902317 100
763
1147
870
200
1391
150 120 651 538 1150 957 170
30 140
170
70 220
40 40 97030 230 800 370
280
510
320
240
1310
170 200 1641 230 460 2127 70
320
420
710
450
1510
240 280 1471 210 820 1677 140
170
120 1841 100 240 2437
250
560
320
280
1070
270 250 1351 200 340 1847 540
20 900
80 100
1300
562 80 36040 60520 561
640
510
120 5
1110
90 5 330 430 80450 90
550
1210
520
560
190 2940 260 510 1580 260
260 1290 2940 240 402430
597
860
560
250
880
730 110 2290 181 450 3130 480
30 20
50 170
40 370 70 198350 403274 360 555
405
140 50 23515 053897 260
122
980
460
224
1180
90 263 99355 660 1724 350
50 20
20 20
20 60 20 2361 340 180 3857 50
65 100
120
90 140
100 170 1251 126 200 1800 260
447
530
290
50 940
430 210 1991 171 660 2997 330
336
730
530
110
920
250 170 809 469 980 796 510 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:57pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 No Project PM 21-36 Cumulative No Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-36) Roseville, CA 20 Figure 180
1563
50 160
1454
20 805 110 5510
121
1311
100
200
1657 5 605 107 110 1080
120
1297
60 150
1551
50 1504090 100 8040
135
1442
210
1615 110 136 5
1171
60 120
1817
220 50305 4060130
40 1421
60 1972 2020
100
1341
196
1982 8550
680
1330
70 230
2070
150 230 400 460 70550 110
190
60 50
60 490
200 350 105090 501280 220
110
1060
350
610
1110
60 610 1490 110 340 1680 90
170
940
570
700
1450
380 700 1090 300 350 1370 300
1571
560
1867
250 800 1210
170
100
20 20
70 70 60 1410 230 201890 150
1921
1060
580
2087 140 580
30 680
300
460
670
230 530 103040 560 1190 260
370
1931
20 280
2007
180 6305 360 150 30360 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 4:00pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 LC and TCD Cumulative Year Lane Configuration and Traffic Control at Study Intersections (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 21 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:37pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 LC and TCD_2 Cumulative Year Lane Configuration and Traffic Control at Study Intersections (Intersections 21-38) Roseville, CA 20 Figure 38 37 37 38 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 81
Table 15: Cumulative No Project Traffic Operations
ID North-South Street East-West Street
Control
Type
Cumulative No
Project AM
Cumulative No
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Westbrook Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 37.9 D 86.5 F 2 Hayden Pkwy Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 27.8 C 30.5 C
3 Fiddyment Rd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 67.5 E 82.6 F
4 Diamond Creek
Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy
Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 49.9 D 99.6 F
5 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 48.6 D 130.2 F 6 Walgreens Dwy/Roseville
Pkwy
Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 3.0 A 8.9 A
7 New Meadow Dr Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 8.1 A 15.3 B
8 Foothills Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 127.9 F 157.4 F 9 Fidelity Wy Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 29.3 C 12.6 B
10 Washington Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Signalized 88.6 F 48.7 D 11 Santucci Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 23.3 C 33.0 C 12 Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 74.0 E 31.3 C 13 Market St Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 44.6 D 43.7 D 14 Fiddyment Rd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 130.5 F 104.2 F 15 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 58.4 E 50.3 D 16 Country Club Dr Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 22.3 C 24.2 C 17 Foothills Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 59.1 E 70.8 E 18 Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 52.2 D 70.5 E 19 Hallissy Dr/Gold Coast Dr Pleasant Grove Blvd Signalized 46.8 D 46.3 D 20 Pleasant Grove Blvd Roseville Pkwy Signalized 100.7 F 99.5 F 21 Pleasant Grove Blvd Highland Pointe Dr Signalized 30.3 C 70.8 E 22 Pleasant Grove Blvd SR 65 SB Ramps Signalized 10.7 B 15.0 B 23 Pleasant Grove Blvd SR 65 NB Ramps Signalized 33.2 C 33.4 C 24 Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave Baseline Rd Signalized 49.3 D 64.0 E 25 Westbrook Blvd Baseline Rd Signalized 58.4 E 40.0 D
26 Market St/Stargazer Dr Baseline Rd Signalized 21.7 C 19.0 B

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 82
ID North-South Street East-West Street
Control
Type
Cumulative No
Project AM
Cumulative No
Project PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS
27 Fiddyment Rd Baseline Rd Signalized 61.9 E 75.8 E
28 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd/Cook Riolo Rd
Baseline Rd Signalized 143.7 F 168.4 F
29 Foothills Blvd Baseline Rd/Main St Signalized 70.7 E 72.6 E 30 Westbrook Blvd Brookstone Dr
(North)
Signalized 8.5 A 7.4 A
31 Westbrook Blvd Brookstone Dr
(South)
Signalized 5.2 A 5.0 A
32 Fiddyment Rd Parkland Wy/Angus
Rd
Signalized 26.1 C 30.3 C
33 Fiddyment Rd N Hayden Pkwy Signalized 34.6 C 33.8 C
34 Fiddyment Rd Crawford Pkwy/Old
Coach Dr
Signalized 28.5 C 20.6 C
35 Fiddyment Rd Hayden Pkwy Signalized 13.3 B 12.5 B
36 Fiddyment Rd Village Green Dr/Del
Webb Blvd
Signalized 26.5 C 30.6 C
Notes:

Delay = Average vehicle delay in seconds
1 The study area includes a portion of all signalized intersections citywide.

Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 83
Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volumes
The cumulative plus project conditions reflect cumulative no project traffic volumes combined with proposed project generated trips, estimated based on the trip generation and distribution assumptions described in earlier sections. Traffic operations under these conditions were evaluated for both the AM and PM peak hours. This analysis assumes the same intersection lane configurations and traffic control types as in the cumulative no project scenario, as shown in Figure 21 previously. The cumulative plus project volumes for the study intersections in the AM and PM peak hour are shown in Figure 22 and Figure 23, respectively.

Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Operations
Table 16 summarizes the operations of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours in cumulative plus project conditions. All intersections are projected to operate at the same LOS as under the Cumulative No Project scenario. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in additional operational deficiencies on the roadway network in the cumulative year.

The Phillip Road/Passenger Vehicle Driveway and Phillip Road/Truck Driveway intersections are both expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. Signal warrant analyses and recommended improvements for these two driveways are presented in the following sections.

The LOS calculation sheets for cumulative year with project conditions are shown in Appendix K.

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:58pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 With Project AM 1-20 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 22 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 240
677
587
69 897
443 59 634 222 264 497 136
42 108
138
118
105
292 60 146634 84699 43
75 1104
503
181
912
294 276 1486 127 354 671 157
34 28
114
53 39
480 77 279368 821307 156
222
588
460
82 265
316 123 2834 431 250 1241 494
18 13
120 6615 2 359810 221961 69 555
375
248 15 37135 52010 75
379
584
350
63 578
702 229 2956 619 516 1751 868
60 1710 3446 350 751651
189
622
442
766
112 3177 329 663 1095 388
330
786
62 5
349
72 5 460 580 109 254 62
39 1081
54 79
934
806 103 50218 97306 533
56 122
204
101
277
54 113 104913 120 664 181
408
1418
966
77 1141
152 159 773 644 608 508 76
131
909
522
243
448
385 141 1585 202 200 949 220
103
232 2336 141 116 1201
180
993
740
132
441
185 502 1781 175 561 972 164
317
846
294
304
654
68 228 2224 295 159 1057 67
55 76
38 28
28 163 14 245024 401176 125
26 1372
1067
256
873
889 216 140824 609 1049 497

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 30 31 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 3:59pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 With Project AM 21-36 Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-38) Roseville, CA 22 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 37 38 8 74 8 892 660 75 5
43 29 937 730 264
215
1903
22 202
1855
347 2574 144 44249
1392
409
386
1927 152 577
1173
371
1490
245 823 1085
69 841
320
562
912
112 424 149462 596 1519 73
37 536
548
632
695
275 461 126111 289 1521 179
212
63 12
105
120
161 12 1936 163 71954 98
256
1275
251
1006
892
459 546 1384 112 276 1056 311
232
451
82 302
88 264 222 1354 124 50837 167
439
1427
60 128
1090
66 179 459 946 55313 84
58 1360
110
1296 210 125
17 1370
10 1410 4750 5
1583
44 26
604
37 76895 7739100
213
1489
81 28
857
25 866 280 77416
92 1495
21 23
1194
11 1022 260 42611
105
1433
153
1290 248 189
62 1525
46 65
1343
32 12917 120 243326

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 4:29pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 With Project PM 1-20 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 1-20) Roseville, CA 23 Figure 17 18 19 20 # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 350
730
530
110
920
250 170 911 503 980 838 510
65 100
120
90 140
100 170 1353 126 200 1842 260
129
980
460
231
1180
90 280 106172 660 1752 350
30 20
50 170
40 370 70 205150 403302 360
454
530
290
50 940
430 210 2042 188 660 3018 330
50 20
20 20
20 60 20 2412 340 180 3878 50 555
405
140 50 24025 53918 260
604
860
560
250
880
730 110 2324 198 450 3144 480
260
1290 2974 240 402444
550
1210
520
560
190 2974 260 510 1594 260
640
538
120 5
1178
90 5 330 430 80450 90
20 900
80 100
1300
596 80 36040 60520 575
30 140
170
70 220
40 40 100430 230 814 370
763
1147
870
200
1391
150 120 685 538 1150 971 170
250
560
320
280
1070
270 250 1385 200 340 1861 540
170
120 1875 100 240 2451
320
420
710
450
1510
240 280 1505 210 820 1691 140
280
510
320
240
1310
170 200 1675 230 460 2141 70
350
80 30
20 30
70 20 208520 902331 100
40 1308
787
280
1524
730 390 96030 1117 1170 820

© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS 1 3 24 25Blue Oak Blvd 14 18 Pleasant Grove Blvd Baseline Rd 12 Santucci Blvd
Westbrook Blvd
Fiddyment Blvd Blue Oak Blvd
Washington Blvd Pleasant Grove Blvd 29 Main Rd
Foothills Blvd SITE
Westbrook Blvd
Pleasant Grove Boulevard PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD
Fiddyment Blvd 27
State Highway 65
State Highway 65
Phillip Rd
Watt Ave 10
Fidelity Wy 9
Brookstone Dr
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
Diamond Creek Blvd 2 4 5 Roseville Pkwy 6
New Meadow Dr 7
Foothill Blvd 8 21 20
Market St 13 11 15 16Country Club Dr 17 Hallissy Dr 19 2223 26 28 32 33 34 Crawford Pkwy 3536 Roseville Pkwy 3031 Hayden Pkwy
Angus Rd
Prairie Woods Way Highland Pointe Dr
Gold Coast Dr
Del Webb Blvd Village Green Dr
Old Coach Dr N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 H:\28\28453 - Roseville Utility Operations Center\report\figs\28453_Figs_v2 - 20260825.dwg Aug 31, 2026 - 4:30pm - creynolds Layout Tab: 2040 With Project PM 21-36 Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour Volumes (Intersections 21-38) Roseville, CA 23 Figure # STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING ROADWAY STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT SITE LEGEND 38 37 37 38 8 74 8 1454 1268 75
26 231 6 1522 1317 50
370
1948
20 280
2014
180 6305 360 150 30360
1938
1060
580
2094 140 580
1588
560
1874
250 800 1210
110
1074
350
610
1144
94 610 1490 110 340 1680 104
30 680
300
460
670
230 530 106440 560 1204 260
170
100
20 20
70 70 60 1444 230 201904 150
177
940
570
700
1450
380 700 1107 317 350 1377 300
190
60 50
60 490
200 350 106790 501287 220
680
1330
70 230
2070
150 230 417 460 70557 110
100
1355
196
2016 8550
40 1435
60 2006 2020 5
1188
60 120
1824
220 50305 4060130
121
1328
100
200
1664 5 605 107 110 1080
180
1580
50 160
1461
20 805 110 5510
135
1449
210
1632 110 136
120
1304
60 150
1568
50 1504090 100 8040

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 88
Table 16: Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Operations
ID Intersection
Proposed
Control
Type
Cumulative
No Project
AM
Cumulative
No Project
PM
Cumulative
Plus Project
AM
Cumulative
Plus Project
PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Westbrook Blvd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 37.9 D 86.5 F 39.2 D 94.1 F
2 Hayden Pkwy & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 27.8 C 30.5 C 28.0 C 30.8 C
3 Fiddyment Rd & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 67.5 E 82.6 F 68.3 E 81.9 F
4 Diamond Creek
Blvd/Prairie Woods
Wy & Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 49.9 D 99.6 F 50.8 D 172.3 F
5 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd & Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 48.6 D 130.2 F 49.5 D 128.6 F
6 Walgreens
Dwy/Roseville Pkwy &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 3.0 A 8.9 A 2.9 A 8.9 A
7 New Meadow Dr &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 8.1 A 15.3 B 8.9 A 15.4 B
8 Foothills Blvd & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 127.9 F 157.4 F 129.9 F 159.8 F
9 Fidelity Wy & Blue
Oaks Blvd
Signalized 29.3 C 12.6 B 29.7 C 12.7 B
10 Washington Blvd &
Blue Oaks Blvd
Signalized 88.6 F 48.7 D 88.4 F 48.7 D
11 Santucci Blvd &
Pleasant Grove Blvd
Signalized 23.3 C 33.0 C 24.7 C 34.8 C
12 Westbrook Blvd &
Pleasant Grove Blvd
Signalized 74.0 E 31.3 C 78.2 E 32.3 C
13 Market St & Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Signalized 44.6 D 43.7 D 45.4 D 44.5 D
14 Fiddyment Rd &
Pleasant Grove Blvd
Signalized 130.5 F 104.2 F 129.7 F 104.6 F
15 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd & Pleasant
Grove Blvd
Signalized 58.4 E 50.3 D 58.8 E 50.3 D
16 Country Club Dr &
Pleasant Grove Blvd
Signalized 22.3 C 24.2 C 22.3 C 25.8 C
17 Foothills Blvd &
Pleasant Grove Blvd
Signalized 59.1 E 70.8 E 59.5 E 70.9 E

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 89
ID Intersection
Proposed
Control
Type
Cumulative
No Project
AM
Cumulative
No Project
PM
Cumulative
Plus Project
AM
Cumulative
Plus Project
PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
18 Washington Blvd &
Pleasant Grove Blvd
Signalized 52.2 D 70.5 E 52.4 D 72.1 E
19 Hallissy Dr/Gold Coast
Dr & Pleasant Grove
Blvd
Signalized 46.8 D 46.3 D 47.4 D 46.3 D
20 Pleasant Grove Blvd
& Roseville Pkwy
Signalized 100.7 F 99.5 F 102.6 F 100.9 F
21 Pleasant Grove Blvd
& Highland Pointe Dr
Signalized 30.3 C 70.8 E 30.3 C 70.9 E
22 Pleasant Grove Blvd
& SR 65 SB Ramps
Signalized 10.7 B 15.0 B 10.6 B 15.2 B
23 Pleasant Grove Blvd
& SR 65 NB Ramps
Signalized 33.2 C 33.4 C 33.2 C 33.6 C
24 Santucci Blvd/Watt
Ave & Baseline Rd
Signalized 49.3 D 64.0 E 49.9 D 64.3 E
25 Westbrook Blvd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 58.4 E 40.0 D 60.6 E 40.2 D
26 Market St/Stargazer
Dr & Baseline Rd
Signalized 21.7 C 19.0 B 21.8 C 19.1 B
27 Fiddyment Rd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 61.9 E 75.8 E 62.2 E 76.7 E
28 Woodcreek Oaks
Blvd/Cook Riolo Rd &
Baseline Rd
Signalized 143.7 F 168.4 F 146.3 F 169.4 F
29 Foothills Blvd &
Baseline Rd/Main St
Signalized 70.7 E 72.6 E 70.5 E 73.0 E
30 Westbrook Blvd &
Brookstone Dr (North)
Signalized 8.5 A 7.4 A 8.5 A 7.5 A
31 Westbrook Blvd &
Brookstone Dr (South)
Signalized 5.2 A 5.0 A 5.2 A 5.1 A
32 Fiddyment Rd &
Parkland Wy/Angus
Rd
Signalized 26.1 C 30.3 C 26.4 C 30.4 C
33 Fiddyment Rd & N
Hayden Pkwy
Signalized 34.6 C 33.8 C 34.9 C 34.9 C
34 Fiddyment Rd &
Crawford Pkwy/Old
Coach Dr
Signalized 28.5 C 20.6 C 28.8 C 20.7 C

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 90
ID Intersection
Proposed
Control
Type
Cumulative
No Project
AM
Cumulative
No Project
PM
Cumulative
Plus Project
AM
Cumulative
Plus Project
PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
35 Fiddyment Rd &
Hayden Pkwy
Signalized 13.3 B 12.5 B 13.3 B 12.6 B
36 Fiddyment Rd &
Village Green Dr/Del
Webb Blvd
Signalized 26.5 C 30.6 C 27.0 C 31.1 C
37 Phillip Road &
Passenger Vehicle
Driveway
TWSC1 - - - - 156.8 F 938.7
9 F
38 Phillip Road & Truck
Driveway
TWSC1 - - - - 134.5 F 256.8
3 F
Notes:

TWSC = Two-way stop control. Delay = Average vehicle delay in seconds 1The reported delay reflects the worst-performing approach at the two-way stop-controlled intersection 2 The study area includes a portion of all signalized intersections citywide.

Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026

SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
Peak Hour Signal Warrant analyses were conducted for two project driveway intersections under cumulative year conditions, which are assumed to be one lane per direction on all roads. Figure 24 presents the warrant analysis results for the intersection of Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway. Figure 25 shows the findings for the intersection of Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway and Truck Driveway. The plot point for the Phillip Road and Passenger Vehicle Driveway intersection falls above the applicable warrant curve for the corresponding number of approach lanes. Therefore, this intersection meets the Peak Hour Signal Warrant under cumulative plus project conditions. The plot point for the Phillip Road and Truck Driveway intersection falls below the applicable warrant curve, indicating that the intersection does not meet the Peak Hour Signal Warrant criteria under cumulative plus project conditions.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 91
Figure 24: Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis for Intersection of Phillip Road and Passenger Vehicle Driveway
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026
Figure 25: Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis for Intersection of Phillip Road and Truck Driveway Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2026
2845, 257
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Higher Minor Street
Combined Major Street
Warrant #3 - Peak Hour
100% Warrant Factor
1 Major / 1 Minor
Traffic Volumes
2730, 82
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Higher Minor Street
Combined Major Street
Warrant #3 - Peak Hour
100% Warrant Factor
1 Major / 1 Minor
Traffic Volumes

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 92

IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations are provided for lane modifications and traffic control improvements at the project driveway intersections to address level of service (LOS) deficiencies under cumulative plus project conditions.

As shown in Table 17, it is recommended that a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Phillip Road and Passenger Vehicle Driveway. Since the intersection of Phillip Road and the Truck Driveway does not meet the Peak Hour Signal Warrant criteria, no feasible improvements are identified to improve its operations.

Table 18 summarizes the traffic operations with and without the recommended improvements.

With these improvements, the intersection of Phillip Road and the Passenger Vehicle Driveway is expected to improve from LOS F to LOS A during the AM peak hour, and from LOS F to LOS D during the PM peak hour. Achieving LOS C in the PM peak hour would require widening Phillip Road to four lanes.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 93
Table 17: Recommended Improvements Under Cumulative Year Plus Project Conditions ID Intersection
Lane
Changes
Traffic Control
Change
37 Phillip Road & Passenger Vehicle Driveway* None Add a signal 38 Phillip Road & Truck Driveway No feasible improvements are identified at this location
* The City noted that they will need to take this item to the City Council for adoption as an allowable signal that does not meet the City’s General Plan LOS policy (i.e., LOS C or better).

Table 18: Intersection Operations with Recommended Improvements – Cumulative Year Plus Project
ID Intersection
Control
Type
Peak
Hour
Cumulative Year
Plus Project
Recommended
Improvements
Cumulative
Year Plus
Project
With
Improvement
Delay LOS Delay LOS
37 Phillip Road
& Passenger
Vehicle
Driveway
Signalized AM 156.8 F
Add a signal

7.4 A
PM 938.79 F 52.6 D
The LOS calculation sheets for cumulative plus project conditions with improvements are shown in Appendix L.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Local Transportation Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 94

SITE ACCESS
Visitors to the site will primarily be accessed by vehicles based on the proposed land use.

Employees working may access the site by driving, taking transit, or bicycling. It is unlikely walking trips will be a reasonable way to reach the site due to its proximity to residential areas. Access to the site by personal vehicle, transit, bicycling, and walking were considered.

Vehicle
There are two driveways provided for vehicle access – one for personal vehicles and one for trucks. The analysis performed in this report identified the following configurations for the driveways should be included in site design.
• The Phillip Road / Passenger Vehicle Driveway should include two outbound lanes (one left turn and one right turn) for outbound traffic and a single inbound lane that can be accessed from both directions via a shared westbound through-right lane and an eastbound left-turn lane. The driveway is anticipated to need a traffic signal in the future, but would not need it for opening year. Widening of Phillip Road to four lanes would be beneficial in the future to achieve LOS C or better during both peak hours. • The Phillip Road / Truck Driveway should include a single outbound lane and a single inbound lane that can be accessed from both directions via a shared westbound through-right lane and an eastbound left-turn lane. The driveway should be wide enough to account for larger truck movements in and out of the driveway. The intersection can be stop-controlled for the driveway (free flowing on Phillip Road). Widening of Phillip Road to four lanes would be needed in the future to achieve LOS C or better during both peak hours.

Transit
A transit stop adjacent to the site is not anticipated and would not have demand generated the project for use by opening year. Additionally, no transit routes are planned along Phillip Road, as outlined in the Circulation Element of the General Plan 2035 adopted by the City Council in August 2020. Future evaluation of transit stops may be considered as the area further builds out around the site. It is not anticipated that taking transit will be a reasonable option for people accessing the site.

Bicycle
Although no specific bikeways are identified near the site in the city's Bicycle Master Plan, it is recommended that the site provide locker room facilities for employees who choose to commute by bicycle.

Walking
The project would develop sidewalks adjacent to the site according to the City’s Design Standards. Further sidewalk connections from the site to other areas of the City will be dependent on future development and is not anticipated to be available by opening year or in the near term. It is not anticipated that walking will be a reasonable option for people accessing the site.

August 31, 2026 Roseville EU Operations Center – Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 95
Appendix
A – CEQA Transportation Analysis – Document Review
B – Methodology to Calculate Project VMT
C – Turning Movement Count Data
D – Existing Conditions Synchro Reports
E – Phillip Road Site Project Trip Generation
F – Opening Year No Project Conditions Synchro Reports
G – Opening Year With Project Conditions Synchro Reports H – Opening Year With Project and Improvements Conditions Synchro Reports I – Intersection Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Types Changes in Opening Year J – Cumulative Year No Project Conditions Synchro Reports K – Cumulative Year With Project Conditions Synchro Reports L – Cumulative Year With Project and Improvements Conditions Synchro Reports

Appendix A
CEQA Transportation Analysis – Document
Review

State
SENATE BILL 743
Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) was signed into law in September 2013 and took full effect in July 2020.

Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013) required changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines regarding the analysis of transportation impacts. The purpose of SB 743 is to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.

Prior to implementation of SB 743, CEQA transportation analyses of individual projects typically determined impacts on the circulation system in terms of roadway delay and/or capacity usage at specific locations, such as street intersections or freeway segments. SB 743 changes include the elimination of auto delay, level of service (LOS), and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts.

Under SB 743, a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact. Therefore, level of service (LOS) and other similar vehicle delay or capacity metrics can no longer serve as transportation impact metrics for CEQA analysis. The California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) updated the CEQA Guidelines and provided a final technical advisory in December 201826 (OPR Technical Advisory), which recommends Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts under CEQA. The California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted the CEQA Guidelines including the Guidelines section implementing SB 743. The changes have been approved by the Office of Administrative Law and are now in effect.

Revisions to CEQA transportation analysis requirements do not preclude the application of local general plan policies, municipal and zoning codes, conditions of approval, or any other planning requirements through a city’s planning approval process. These requirements aim to ensure adequate operation of the transportation system in terms of transportation congestion measures related to vehicular delay and roadway capacity.

Other key guidance includes:
• VMT is the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impact. • OPR recommends tour- and trip-based travel models to estimate VMT but ultimately defers to local agencies to determine the appropriate tools. • OPR recommends measuring VMT for residential and office projects on a “per rate” basis.

Specifically, OPR recommends VMT per capita for residential projects and VMT per employee for office projects.
• OPR recommends that a per capita or per employee VMT that is fifteen percent below that of existing development may be a reasonable threshold (page 10). In other words, an office project that generates VMT per employee that is more than 85 percent of the regional VMT per employee could result in a significant impact. OPR notes that this threshold is supported by evidence that connects this level of reduction to the State’s emissions goals (pages 10-11).
26 California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, “Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA,” December 2018.

• For retail projects, OPR recommends measuring the net decrease or increase in VMT in the planning area with and without the project. The recommended impact threshold is any increase in total VMT.
• Lead agencies ultimately have the discretion to set or apply their own significance thresholds, provided they are based on significant evidence. • Cities and counties still have the ability to use measures of delay such as LOS for other plans, studies, or network monitoring. However, according to CEQA section 15064.3, Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts, “effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact.” CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050 (2021)
27 The California Transportation Plan 2050 is a long-range transportation roadmap to achieve a safe, resilient and universally accessible transportation system that supports vibrant communities, advances racial and economic justice, and improves public and economic health in the State of California. The Plan emphasizes implementation and puts forward goals, policies and recommendations to meet the future multimodal mobility needs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). The following are the goals are applicable to the proposed project:
• Safety: Provide a safe and secure transportation system. o Eliminate fatalities and serious injuries on the transportation system. o Improve personal security and infrastructure security on the transportation system. o Improve emergency preparedness, response, and recovery on the transportation system.
• Climate: Achieve statewide GHG emission reduction targets and increase resilience to climate change.
o Advance a clean, carbon neutral transportation system. o Increase climate resiliency.
• Equity: Eliminate transportation burdens for low-income communities, communities of color, people with disabilities and other disadvantaged groups. o Improve transportation-related economic, environmental, and public health outcomes for disadvantaged communities.
o Improve access to a range of high-quality, safe, and affordable mobility options within disadvantaged communities.
o Support disadvantaged communities in playing an active and direct role in transportation decision making.
• Accessibility: Improve multimodal mobility and access to destinations for all users. o Increase access to destinations.
o Increase the competitiveness of transit, shared mobility, and active transportation options.
o Provide integrated and seamless travel connections.
o Optimize system performance for all modes.
• Quality of life and public health: Enable vibrant, healthy communities. o Expand access to healthy transportation options.
o Reduce household transportation costs.
o Improve transportation-related public health outcomes. o Support enjoyable trip experiences and vibrant public spaces. 27 https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportation-planning/documents/ctp-2050-v3-a11y.pdf

• Environment: Enhance environmental health and reduce negative transportation impacts.
o Improve air quality and minimize pollutants from transportation. o Protect and enhance California’s natural resources and ecosystems. o Protect and enhance California historic and cultural resource. • Economy: Support a vibrant, resilient economy.
o Support diverse, equitable, and sustained economic growth. o Facilitate efficient, reliable, and sustainable goods movement. o Support local and regional economic development.
• Infrastructure: Maintain a high-quality, resilient transportation system. o Preserve and maintain existing multimodal transportation assets in a state of good repair.
o Increase infrastructure resiliency to climate change and natural disasters.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is the primary State agency responsible for transportation issues. As owner/operator of the State Highway System, Caltrans may review projects and plans as a commenting agency or responsible agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In relation to this role, Caltrans published the Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide” in May 2020. This replaced the “Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies” (December 2002), which established Measures of Effectiveness based on level of service targets.

Caltrans recommends following the guidance on methods of VMT assessment found in OPR’s Technical Advisory. Caltrans comments on a CEQA document may note methodological deviations from those methods and may recommend that significance determinations and mitigation be aligned with state greenhouse gas reduction goals as articulated in OPR’s guidance, the California Air Resources Board’s Scoping Plan, and related documentation.

Caltrans facilities within the study area include State Route 65 (SR 65).

For projects that may physically affect facilities under its administration, Caltrans requires encroachment permits before any construction work may be undertaken.

Regional
SACOG NEXT GENERATION TRANSIT STRATEGY (2021)28
SACOG’s Next Generation Transit Strategy builds upon its 2020 MTP-SCS vision for a high quality, resilient and sustainable public transit system. The strategy is organized around four key focus areas:
• Seamless User Experience
• Planning and Funding
• Transit Design and Delivery
• Reduce Mobility Disparities
The objectives of the strategy are as follows:
28 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/308/638218230960130000

• Getting around by transit is fast, reliable and competitive with driving. • Reduced disparities in travel time and cost; more travel options for disadvantaged communities.
• Improved transit access to top employment centers and destinations. • Transit feels easy, seamless, and safe for all users. • More coordination between agencies leads to better service for all. • Makes the best use of public dollars by minimizing costs while maintaining or increasing ridership.
• Service is adequately and consistently funded.
• Meets or exceeds targets for renewable energy, emissions and VMT.

SACOG MTP/SCS (2020)
29 SACOG’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) outlines a transportation and land use strategy to support regional prosperity, enhance access to jobs and economic opportunities, and provide transportation options and affordable housing for all. The Plan is based on four priority policy areas:
• Build vibrant places for today’s and tomorrow's residents. • Foster the next generation of mobility solutions.
• Modernize the way we pay for transportation infrastructure. • Build and maintain a safe, reliable, and multimodal transportation system.

SACOG CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS UPDATE (2020) 30
Congestion management involves implementing strategies to enhance transportation system performance and reliability by minimizing the negative effects of congestion on the movement of people and goods. Congestion Management Process (CMP) provides updated data on transportation system performance and evaluates alternative strategies that address both state and local needs. SACOG's CMP is an integral component of its MTP-SCS, with updates occurring every four years. The latest update to the CMP objectives in 2020 involved integrating updated MTP policies/objectives and collaborating with the CMP working group.

The following are the objectives outlined in the CMP:
• Maintain or improve travel time reliability for freight and passenger vehicles • Reduce traffic congestion for freight and passenger vehicles. • Promote development that encourages making trips by public transit. • Support proactive and innovative education and transportation demand management programs, covering all parts of the urbanized area, to offer a variety of choices to driving alone.
• Prioritize investments in transit, bike, and pedestrian improvements that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). • Implement pilot projects aimed at making micromobility (such as bike and scooter share) work for urban, suburban, and low-income areas of the region. 29 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/76/638212804736270000 30 https://www.sacog.org/home/showpublisheddocument/1810/638376412235970000

SACOG REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB DESIGN GUIDANCE31
Mobility hubs provide a seamless connection between different transportation options, enabling people to easily transition between modes to reach their destinations. The vision of SACOG’s Regional Mobility Hub Design Guidance is to establish a network of regional hubs that prioritize people, focusing on universal accessibility, safety, and community integration. These hubs are to be designed to seamlessly connect two or more transportation modes, including transit, biking, walking, shared mobility services, carpooling/vanpooling, and on-demand services and provide integrated, equitable mobility through flexible and user-friendly design.

PLACER COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2019) 32
The Placer County Regional Transportation Plan is a document developed to provide policy and funding guidelines for short-range and long-range transportation needs for the county’s transportation system over the next twenty years. The Plan’s goal is to support well-planned growth and land use patterns while improving environmental quality through better management of the transportation system. Additionally, the Plan seeks to improve access and mobility for all individuals, ensure viable travel options to jobs, services, and housing across the county. The goals and objectives of the Plan relevant to the proposed project are:

Goal 1: Highways/Streets/Roadways - Maintain and upgrade a safe, efficient, and convenient countywide roadway system that meets the travel needs of people and the movement of goods through and within the region.
• Objective A: Identify and prioritize improvements to the roadway system. • Objective B: Construct, maintain, and upgrade roadways to meet current safety standards.
• Objective C: To promote economic development, prioritize roadway maintenance and improvement projects on principal freight and tourist travel routes in Placer County.

Goal 2: Public Transit - Provide effective, convenient, regionally and locally coordinated transit service that connects residential areas with employment centers, serves key activity centers and facilities, and offers a viable option to the drive-alone commute. • Objective A: Provide transit services that fulfill all “unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet.”
• Objective B: Tailor transit services and programs to the area’s population characteristics and special needs.
• Objective C: Develop and encourage the use of public transit as a viable alternative to the automobile in order to maximize transit ridership.
• Objective D: Coordinate various transportation services to maximize efficiency and convenience and minimize duplication of services.

Goal 5: Goods Movement - Provide for the safe and efficient movement of goods through, within, and into Placer County.
• Objective A: Promote a balance of roads, rail, and airports for the improvement of goods transport.
31 https://www.sacog.org/planning/transportation/sustainable-mobility-program/mobility-hubs 32 https://pctpa.specialdistrict.org/files/e9ce02f5b/Final_2040_RTP_Full_Document.pdf

• Objective B: Mitigate conditions that transporters of goods and local jurisdictions deem dangerous or unacceptable.

Goal 6: Active & Alternative Transportation - Promote a safe, convenient, and efficient transportation system for bicyclists, pedestrians, and users of low-speed vehicles, as part of a balanced overall transportation system.
• Objective A: Plan and develop a continuous and easily accessible bicycle, pedestrian, and low-speed vehicle system within the region.
• Objective B: Provide a bicycle, pedestrian, and low-speed vehicle system that emphasizes the safety of people and property.
• Objective C: Integrate pedestrian, bicycle, and low-speed vehicle facilities into a multimodal transportation system that encourages alternatives to driving alone. • Objective D: Promote the development of multi-use trails in rural and open space areas.

Goal 7: Transportation Systems Management (TSM) - Provide an economical alternative to single-occupant vehicle travel through the use of alternative transportation methods. • Objective A: Create a multi-modal transportation network between major residential areas, educational and recreational facilities, and employment centers. • Objective B: Advance the use of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in a thorough, cost-effective manner.
• Objective C: Promote the use of technology to reduce work-related, education related, and personal trips.

Goal 9: Integrated Land Use, Air Quality & Transportation Planning - By integrating land, air, and transportation planning, build and maintain the most efficient and effective transportation system possible while achieving the highest possible environmental benefit. • Objective A: Provide information and support services to jurisdictions regarding the countywide transportation impacts of local land use decisions. • Objective B: Provide transportation infrastructure that meets existing and future needs.

PLACER COUNTY GENERAL PLAN (2013 UPDATE) 33
Placer County General Plan (last updated in May 2013) serves as a guiding document for land use and development in the County. The goals and policies of the Plan that are applicable to the proposed project:

Goal 3.B: To promote a safe and efficient mass transit system, including both rail and bus, to reduce congestion, improve the environment, and provide viable non-automotive means of transportation in and through Placer County.
• Policy 3.B.1. The County shall work with transit providers to plan and implement additional transit services within and to the County that are timely, cost-effective, and responsive to growth patterns and existing and future transit demand. • Policy 3.B.3. The County shall consider the need for future transit right-of-way in reviewing and approving plans for development. Rights-of-way may either be exclusive or shared with other vehicles.
33 https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/8571/Introduction-PDF

• Policy 3.B.7. The County shall continue to explore development of other rail systems, such as the Roseville to Marysville service, to serve Placer County residents, workers, and businesses.
• Policy 3.B.11. The County shall support efforts to provide demand-responsive service ("paratransit") and other transportation services for those unable to use conventional transit.

Goal 3.C: To maximize the efficient use of transportation facilities so as to: 1) reduce travel demand on the County's roadway system; 2) reduce the amount of investment required in new or expanded facilities; 3) reduce the quantity of emissions of pollutants from automobiles; and 4) increase the energy-efficiency of the transportation system. • Policy 3.C.1. The County shall promote the use of transportation systems management (TSM) programs that divert automobile commute trips to transit, walking, and bicycling. • Policy 3.C.2. The County shall promote the use, by both the public and private sectors, of TSM programs that increase the average occupancy of vehicles.

Goal 3.D: To provide a safe, comprehensive, and integrated system of facilities for nonmotorized transportation. • Policy 3.D.1. The County shall promote the development of a comprehensive and safe system of recreational and commuter bicycle routes that provide connections between the County's major employment and housing areas and between its existing and planned bikeways.
• Policy 3.D.2. The County shall work with neighboring jurisdictions to coordinate planning and development of the County's bikeways and multi-purpose trails with those of neighboring jurisdictions.
• Policy 3.D.4. The County shall promote non-motorized travel (bikeways, pedestrian, and equestrian) through appropriate facilities, programs, and information. • Policy 3.D.10. Consider the accessibility and accommodation of cycle and pedestrian traffic, where appropriate, on and across major thoroughfares. • Policy 3.D.11. The County shall work to achieve equality of convenience and choice among all modes of transportation – pedestrian, cycling, transit and motor vehicles, through a balanced and interconnected transportation system. • Policy 3.D.112. Provide safe and comfortable routes for walking, cycling, and where feasible, public transportation, to encourage use of these modes of transportation, enable convenient and active travel as part of daily activities, reduce pollution, and meet the needs of all users of the roadway system.

PLACER COUNTY SUSTAINABILITY PLAN (2020) 34
The Placer County Sustainability Plan puts forward the analyzes and recommendations for GHG reduction and climate adaptation strategies in the unincorporated county. It sets GHG emission reduction targets for the years 2030 and 2050 for the county in MTCO2e/person. The strategies identified in the Plan to reduce transportation-related GHG emissions are:
• Strategy T-1: Facilitate the installation of public electric vehicle (EV) charging stations at existing and new residential and non-residential uses.
34 https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/42940/PCSP-ADOPTION?bidId=

• Strategy T-4: Partner with surrounding regional transit agencies to improve connectivity to regional transportation systems.
• Strategy T-5: Partner with incorporated communities and regional agencies to develop bikeways and trails between communities.
• Strategy T-9: Increase on-demand micro-transit opportunities in the county to provide reliable transit between underserved areas and major transportation hubs. • Strategy T-11: Encourage active transportation use by increasing street and roadway safety through infrastructure improvements.
• Strategy T-12: Consider the feasibility of implementing bike share programs in developed areas of the county, in concert with incorporated communities and regional agencies.

PLACER COUNTY REGIONAL BIKEWAY PLAN (2018) 35
The Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan updates the prior Regional Bikeway Plan adopted in 2002 and establishes a vision to promote safe, convenient, and enjoyable bicycling by establishing a comprehensive system of bikeways that link the communities throughout the county. The Plan develops a regional system of bikeways that connect six incorporated cities and other unincorporated areas of the county and proposes bikeways in the unincorporated county or bikeways requiring multijurisdictional coordination. The Plan aims to enhance bicycling for commuter and recreational use in the county through policies in three categories: safety, mobility and preservation.

The Plan proposes the following bikeways in the project’s study area:
• Baseline Road between Fiddyment Road and West County limits – Buffered Bike Lane • Pleasant Grove Road between Baseline Road and Moore Road – Shared Use Path/Side Path
Local
CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL PLAN (2020)
36 The City of Roseville General Plan 2035, adopted in 2020, acts as a policy guide for the city's future development and growth. The Plan is intended to be long-range, comprehensive and community focused. The Plan designates land use categories throughout the city, defining each land use category, including general uses, development, intensity, siting and compatibility standards.

The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines Roseville’s objectives for its circulation system, including the overall framework, level of service standards, design requirements, and policies that align with the city’s broader planning, economic, social, and environmental goals.

The objective of this element is to ensure accessibility to key destinations for all modes of travel, enhance travel options for residents, workers, and visitors, and maintain the transportation network in optimal condition.
35 https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/57938/Placer-County-Regional-Bikeway-Plan-FINAL-20180629?bidId= 36 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services/Planning/City%20of% 20Roseville%20GP.pdf

The General Plan includes the following goals and policies related to transportation and circulation applicable to the proposed project:

Goal CIRC2 Maintain an appropriate level of transportation service for all of Roseville's residents, employees, and consumers through a balanced transportation system that considers automobiles, transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians.
• Policy CIRC2.1 Maintain a LOS "C" standard at a minimum of 70 percent of all signalized intersections and roadway segments in the City during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

Exceptions to the LOS “C” standard may be considered where improvements required to achieve the standard would adversely affect pedestrian, bicycle, or transit access, and where feasible LOS improvements and travel demand-reducing strategies have been exhausted.
• Policy CIRC2.2 Strive to meet the level of service standard through a balanced transportation system that reduces the auto emissions that contribute to climate change, by providing alternatives to the automobile and avoiding excessive vehicle congestion through roadway improvements, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and transit improvements.
• Policy CIRC2.3 Work with neighboring jurisdictions to provide acceptable and compatible levels of service on the roadways that cross the City's boundaries. • Policy CIRC2.4 Secure adequate funding for all components of the City's transportation system to ensure the level of service policy is maintained. • Policy CIRC2.5 Pedestrian, bicycle travel, and transit access have a higher priority than automobile travel in the City’s Pedestrian Districts, and development projects in these areas are exempt from the City’s LOS standard.
• Policy CIRC2.6 Prioritize investments in pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access in Pedestrian Districts.

Goal CIRC3 Provide a safe, convenient, and efficient transit system to enhance mobility; reduce congestion; reduce auto emissions, including emissions that contribute to climate change; improve the environment; and provide viable non-automotive means of transportation in and through Roseville.
• Policy CIRC3.1 Promote transit service that is convenient, cost-effective, and responsive to the challenges and opportunities of serving Roseville and surrounding communities and explore opportunities for transit innovation and service improvements. • Policy CIRC3.2 Pursue all available sources of funding for sustainable transit services. • Policy CIRC3.3 Continue to study options for introducing high quality transit and/or other regional transit linkages to Roseville and developing convenient connections to Sacramento Regional Transit light rail service.
• Policy CIRC3.4 Support and remain actively involved in planning for the expansion of Capitol Corridor rail service, as well as other regional linkages. • Policy CIRC3.5 Consider access to health care, community services and employment, and the needs of persons who may be transit-dependent when making decisions regarding transit service.
• Policy CIRC3.6 Identify opportunities to increase the number and/or capacity of parkand-ride lots as needed, to increase transit and carpool/vanpool use. • Policy CIRC3.7 Pursue transit routes that optimize ridership.

• Policy CIRC3.8 Include transit improvements with new roadway or roadway expansion projects.

Goal CIRC4 Reduce vehicle miles traveled on the City's and regional roadway systems, while expanding mobility options for residents, employees, and visitors. • Policy CIRC4.1 The City will review and condition projects as appropriate, to reduce travel demand per capita and per employee by promoting increased density near transit, improving the quality of non-vehicular transportation options, providing incentives for non-vehicular travel, encouraging the mixing of complementary land uses in proximity to one another, and using other feasible methods.
• Policy CIRC4.2 Work with appropriate agencies to develop implementation measures to reduce vehicular travel demand and total vehicle miles traveled and meet air quality and greenhouse gas emissions goals.
• Policy CIRC4.3 Specific Plan Amendments and land use development projects not included in a Specific Plan shall be evaluated for consistency with the City’s VMT Impact Standards.
• Policy CIRC4.4 If the evaluation required by CIRC4.3 finds a Specific Plan Amendment or land use development project not included in an adopted Specific Plan is inconsistent with thresholds established within the City’s VMT Impact Standards, on-site land use, transportation, and urban design-related VMT-reducing features should be prioritized to demonstrate consistency. If feasible on-site features cannot achieve the VMT threshold, Specific Plan Amendments and land use development projects outside Specific Plan Areas may demonstrate equivalent consistency through off-site actions or fair-share fee contributions, or if consistency cannot be achieved, shall implement all feasible measures.
• Policy CIRC4.5 Policy CIRC4.3 does not apply to projects that propose residential or office uses in Transit Priority Areas or low-VMT areas. Low-VMT areas are those shown to have per-capita, per-employee, or per-service-population VMT rates that are at least 15 percent less than the baseline citywide or regional rate. • Policy CIRC4.6 Promote and incentivize Infill development, particularly affordable housing development, through assistance in obtaining outside grant funding and reductions or deferrals in impact fees.
• Policy CIRC4.7 Continue to educate the public and business community about alternative modes of travel through Safe Routes to School, Transportation Systems Management, and other local and regional programs and events.

Goal CIRC5.1 Increase the percentage of all trips made by bicycles in Roseville.

Goal CIRC5.2 Establish and maintain a safe, comprehensive, and integrated bikeway and trail system that encourages the use of bikes and walking for commuting, recreational, and other trips.

Goal CIRC5.3 Maintain the Bicycle Friendly Community Designation from the League of American Bicyclists.
• Policy CIRC5.1 Develop a comprehensive and safe system of recreational and commuter bicycle routes and trails that provides connections between the City's major destinations (including employment) and housing areas and between its existing and planned bikeways.
• Policy CIRC5.2 Coordinate Roseville's bikeway and trail system with those of neighboring jurisdictions to provide both local and regional connections. • Policy CIRC5.3 Pursue available sources of funding for bikeways and trails. • Policy CIRC5.4 Enhance bicycle education, encouragement, and enforcement programs targeted at adult and child bicyclists and motorists. • Policy CIRC5.5 Specific Plans shall incorporate an off-street, Class I bicycle system as part of the comprehensive on-street and off-street bikeway plan. • Policy CIRC5.6 Educate, encourage, and enforce programs that increase bicyclist and motorist awareness of the rights and responsibilities of bicyclists in order to foster a climate of acceptance for bicycle riding.
• Policy CIRC5.7 Include on-street and off-street bicycle improvements with new roadway and roadway expansion projects.

Goal CIRC6.1 Increase the percentage of pedestrian trips in Roseville. • Policy CIRC6.1 Establish and maintain a safe and continuous pedestrian network that provides connections between residential areas and commercial retail and services, employment, public services, parks, and public transit. • Policy CIRC6.2 Promote development patterns that encourage people to walk to destinations.
• Policy CIRC6.3 Enhance pedestrian-friendly street environments and design public spaces and destinations in a way that encourages walking. • Policy CIRC6.4 Sidewalks shall be required in all new Specific Plan Areas, with new roadway construction, and with roadway expansion.
• Policy CIRC6.5 In reviewing proposed development projects and implementing public projects, the City will incorporate standards designed to protect the security of pedestrians and minimize the potential for collisions involving pedestrians. • Policy CIRC6.6 In the Infill Area, the City will actively seek funding sources to complete and maintain sidewalk networks.

In addition to the Circulation Element, other elements in the General Plan including Chapter 4 Air Quality and Climate Change Element and Chapter 5 Open Space and Conservation Element include components relevant to the proposed project.

Chapter 4 Air Quality and Climate Change Element: The goals and policies in the Air Quality and Climate Element relevant to the proposed project are:

Goal AQ1.3 Coordinate all forms of public transport to decrease vehicle miles traveled, while encouraging an increase in the commute vehicle occupancy rate.

Goal AQ.4 Increase the capacity of the pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation systems and promote vehicular transportation that uses less-polluting fuels, such as electricity.

Goal AQ1.5 Provide adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities for present and future transportation needs.

Goal AQ1.6 Promote a well-designed and efficient transit system.

Goal AQ1.7 Improve transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access to lessen dependence on automobile travel and reduce household transportation costs. • Policy AQ1.12 Develop transportation systems that reduce vehicle emissions by improving the desirability of walking, bicycling, and public transportation relative to vehicular travel.
• Policy AQ1.13 Identify feasible strategies to reduce transportation emissions from new projects and existing development within the Planning Area. • Policy AQ1.14 Encourage alternative modes of transportation, including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit use.
• Policy AQ1.15 Promote and incentivize low-emissions vehicles and associated charging infrastructure and pursue funding from state programs and other sources to facilitate local purchase and use of electric vehicles.
• Policy AQ1.16 Implement land use policies that maintain and improve air quality and expand opportunities for transit-oriented development, which allows residents to significantly reduce vehicular transportation and associated air pollutant emissions. • Policy AQ1.17 Conserve energy and reduce air pollutant emissions by encouraging energy efficient building designs and transportation systems and promoting energy efficiency retrofits of existing structures.
• Policy AQ1.18 Promote building and transportation energy efficiency in new residential and commercial development by encouraging and incentivizing implementation measures early in the design and development process.

Chapter 5 Open Space and Conservation Element: The goals and policies in the Open Space and Conservation Element relevant to the proposed project are:

Goal OS1.3 Provide access to public open space areas through a network of pedestrian and bicycle trails that will be adequately managed and protected. • Policy OS1.1 Provide an interconnecting system of open space corridors that, where feasible, incorporate bikeways and pedestrian paths.
• Policy OS1.2 Provide interconnected open space corridors between open space and habitat resources, recreation areas, schools, employment, commercial service, and residential areas.
• Policy OS1.3 Work with adjacent jurisdictions to connect the City with regional open space and trail systems, providing a network of open space and habitat resources,

pathways, and, where feasible, equestrian trails through the City to link nearby communities.
• Policy OS1.4 Require all new development to provide pedestrian and bicycle linkages to existing and planned open space systems. Where such access cannot be provided through the creation of open space connections, identify alternative linkages.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN (2011) 37
The City of Roseville’s Pedestrian Master Plan focuses on improving the design and development of public pedestrian pathways to create a safe, efficient, and visually appealing environment for all pedestrians. The Plan aims to establish a well-connected network of sidewalks and street crossings, providing Roseville residents with diverse transportation options, including walking, biking, transit, and driving. It prioritizes inclusive design, incorporating policies, projects, and programs to promote walking as a fundamental mode of transportation, while also supporting health and recreation for people of all ages and abilities. Additionally, it proposes the creation of Pedestrian Overlay Districts in areas where increased pedestrian activity is desired through the provision of enhanced pedestrian facilities.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COMMUNITYWIDE SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN (2010) 38 The City of Roseville Communitywide Sustainability Action Plan (SAP) outlines key objectives aimed at implementing transportation measures that reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and associated Greenhouse Gas (GHG), NOx and PM10 emissions. The objectives of the Plan relevant to the proposed project are:
• Objective T-2: Manage the availability and cost of parking to minimize driving demand, encourage alternatives to driving and reduce emissions. • Objective T-3: Increase carpool and vanpool opportunities to increase the non-single occupancy vehicle mode share (by ~2%).
• Objective T-4: Enhance local and regional transit systems to increase transit ridership (~1% mode shift).
• Objective T-5: Expand and enhance the bikeway network and support facilities and encourage their use to increase bike ridership (~1% biking and walking combined mode shift).
• Objective T-6: Improve the pedestrian environment to increase walking. • Objective T-8: Promote use of alternative fuel or high-fuel efficient vehicles to help reduce emissions.
• Objective T-9: Enhance efficiency of the City's roadway network to reduce vehicle delays and emissions while maintaining or enhancing the bicycle and pedestrian environment.
37 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/Biking%20&%20Walking/Plan ning/2-2011_Pedestrian%20Master%20Plan_WEB.pdf
38 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/Roseville%20Transit/Air%20Qu ality/SAP010611.pdf

The objectives of the Plan aim to reduce the overall environmental footprint of the transportation system and serve as guidelines in setting VMT reduction strategies for the proposed project.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN (2008) 39
The City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan aims to achieve a balanced, multi-modal transportation system by developing a well-connected, safe, and accessible bikeway network that serves bicyclists of all levels and provides Roseville residents a variety of transportation choices, including automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian options. The Plan also focuses on creating bikeway support facilities such as bike racks and repair stations to encourage both commuter and recreational cycling. The plan sets a goal to increase bicycle use in the City by 50 percent by 2020, promoting cycling for work, school, play and other destinations through incentives and encouragement efforts.

Additionally, the Plan identifies existing and proposed bicycle routes in the City. The proposed bikeway system includes 28 miles of Class I trails, 27 miles of Class II bike lanes and 33 miles of proposed Class III bike routes, totaling approximately 95 miles of new bikeways. In the study area, the Plan proposes a Class II bike lane along Blue Oaks Boulevard between Fiddyment Road and Lower Bank Drive.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES (2008) 40 The Community Design Guidelines establishes design and technical guidelines including a list of specific recommendations and requirements for each land use category including commercial, office and industrial, multi-family and compact residential, for including in project design. The design goals for office and industrial development in relation to transportation are:

1. To seek site designs that preserve, enhance, and incorporate the natural features of a site as an element within the overall design.

2. To require project designs to incorporate pedestrian and transit linkages within the project, with adjacent properties, and with the City as a whole.

3. To establish a streetscape presence and appearance through setbacks, landscaping, building placement and architecture that defines the pedestrian and vehicle corridor, and presents an appealing and continuous theme along a sidewalk or street. 39 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Public%20Works/Biking%20&%20Walking/Plan ning/2008%20Bicycle%20Master%20Plan2.pdf
40 https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7964838/File/Government/Departments/Development%20Services/Planning/General%20 Plan/cdgweb032408.pdf

Appendix B
Methodology to Calculate Project VMT

APPENDIX B

METHODOLOGY TO CALCULATE PROJECT VMT
This section outlines the methodology followed to calculate Project VMT.

1. Based on the 2020 City of Roseville’s travel forecasting model, the project is in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 848.

2. In the base year 2020, TAZ 848 includes 5 single-family homes and 2 multi-family homes.

3. The land use types in the model that are relevant to the project’s trip generation are Office (for employee trips) and Industrial (for truck trips).

4. However, the Office and Industrial land use types are included as Thousand Square Feet (KSF) in the model, while the project trip generation is measured in units of the number of employee trips and number of truck trips.

5. To be compatible with the land use inputs in the model, the project employee and truck trips are converted to KSF units.

6. The project trip generation for employees and trucks is calculated based on the full build-out of the project.

Table 1. Project Trip Generation in units of Thousand Square Feet Project Weekday Daily Vehicle
Trips (full build-out)
Model Trip Generation Rates Project Trip
Generation to use in
the model (KSF)
Land Use
Type
Units Daily Vehicle Trip
Rate
2318 (Employees) Office KSF 17.7 130.94
586 (Trucks) Industrial KSF 7.6 77.1
*KSF – Thousand Square Feet
As shown in Table 1, the project trip generation (in KSF) is added to TAZ 848 to calculate the With Project VMT.

7. The 2020 City of Roseville travel forecasting model is run for the No Project and With Project scenarios.

8. Total VMT for TAZ 848 is the sum of “VMT From” and “VMT To” of the TAZ.

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑀𝑇 = 𝑉𝑀𝑇𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 + 𝑉𝑀𝑇𝑇𝑜
Table 2 shows the Total VMT for the Project TAZ 848 for the No Project and With Project scenarios. The Total VMT includes the VMT Produced from residents, employees and trucks.

Table 2. Total VMT for the Project TAZ (848)
Scenario VMT From VMT To Total VMT
Project TAZ No Project 289 289 578
Project TAZ With Project (full build out) 15,153 15,230 30,383

9. The Project VMT is then calculated as the difference in the Project TAZ VMT for the No Project and With Project scenarios.

𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑉𝑀𝑇 = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑀𝑇(𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡) − 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑀𝑇(𝑁𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡) Project VMT = 30,383 – 578 = 29,805.

Appendix C
Turning Movement Count Data

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fiddyment Rd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723519 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
1018 694
51 562 405
375 61 230 905
403 0.88 260
530 66 415 1192
62 403 371
1028 836
Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:40 AM -- 7:55 AM

1.9 2.6

3.9 2.7 0.5

4.8 0 0 2.2

1.7 2.7

3.8 19.7 3.1 1.3

14.5 4.5 1.6
4 3.9
0 0 1
0 0 0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0 4
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fiddyment Rd
(Northbound)
Fiddyment Rd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 5 17 23 0 27 50 6 0 5 21 5 0 21 25 13 0 218
7:05 AM 2 20 16 0 23 45 6 0 3 17 5 0 15 14 7 0 173
7:10 AM 3 21 27 0 30 34 5 0 5 28 3 0 30 10 17 0 213
7:15 AM 7 25 23 0 20 33 6 0 5 49 6 1 34 16 21 2 248
7:20 AM 8 51 27 0 42 47 4 0 4 43 7 1 37 18 18 1 308
7:25 AM 3 21 36 0 44 56 4 0 4 58 8 0 34 16 17 0 301
7:30 AM 7 48 32 0 18 41 2 0 4 37 3 0 33 16 22 2 265
7:35 AM 3 39 30 0 53 53 5 0 1 37 9 0 41 18 17 2 308
7:40 AM 8 28 32 0 47 62 6 0 6 44 5 0 31 20 15 0 304
7:45 AM 4 46 33 0 39 72 7 1 5 18 2 0 43 30 16 2 318
7:50 AM 8 44 39 0 60 58 4 0 9 31 4 0 22 20 15 0 314
7:55 AM 4 29 29 0 21 42 2 0 4 12 5 0 36 31 16 0 231 3201 8:00 AM 0 26 30 0 21 39 4 0 7 34 4 0 27 21 26 0 239 3222 8:05 AM 9 26 40 0 12 24 2 1 2 20 9 0 32 29 26 3 235 3284 8:10 AM 1 20 20 0 26 35 5 0 8 20 4 0 30 25 21 3 218 3289 8:15 AM 9 36 38 0 18 23 3 0 5 23 5 1 34 18 15 1 229 3270 8:20 AM 3 33 27 0 28 35 4 0 4 16 4 1 36 15 19 2 227 3189 8:25 AM 5 21 21 0 15 35 3 0 8 21 8 0 34 14 13 2 200 3088 8:30 AM 10 27 34 0 22 35 4 1 4 27 5 0 21 22 12 2 226 3049 8:35 AM 3 17 33 0 27 30 0 0 4 28 8 0 22 17 8 1 198 2939 8:40 AM 6 34 31 0 25 19 1 0 4 25 3 0 24 15 11 1 199 2834 8:45 AM 3 23 25 0 29 38 6 0 7 34 3 1 34 20 16 5 244 2760 8:50 AM 8 35 41 0 19 31 5 0 5 26 4 1 23 16 19 3 236 2682 8:55 AM 3 25 28 0 16 38 6 0 6 21 3 0 33 24 21 2 226 2677 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 80 472 416 0 584 768 68 4 80 372 44 0 384 280 184 8 3744 Heavy Trucks 12 20 4 4 24 4 0 0 4 8 8 0 88
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fiddyment Rd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723520 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
864 1093
61 502 301
571 92 444 1590
253 0.95 472
382 37 674 1067
39 550 476
1170 1065
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM

0.7 0.3

3.3 0.4 0.7

0.9 0 0 0.8

0.8 0.6

0.8 2.7 1.5 0.7
0 0.5 0.8

1.1 0.7
0 0 2
1 0 0 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 1 3
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fiddyment Rd
(Northbound)
Fiddyment Rd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 6 37 35 0 21 37 3 1 8 15 8 0 57 22 21 5 276
4:05 PM 5 33 36 0 32 49 6 0 7 19 5 0 56 33 46 4 331
4:10 PM 11 53 36 0 22 18 5 0 4 29 5 0 40 38 29 9 299
4:15 PM 5 56 33 0 33 56 2 0 4 27 3 0 38 39 22 4 322
4:20 PM 1 60 24 0 31 58 7 1 1 15 4 0 31 32 32 3 300
4:25 PM 2 50 32 0 19 44 9 2 7 20 3 1 46 33 30 2 300
4:30 PM 3 29 29 0 11 23 2 1 4 22 3 1 49 40 26 3 246
4:35 PM 5 40 44 0 29 35 5 0 7 21 3 0 37 33 25 3 287
4:40 PM 5 27 27 0 28 27 2 1 9 22 1 0 43 39 40 4 275
4:45 PM 3 44 35 0 26 41 2 1 4 18 4 0 59 32 26 2 297
4:50 PM 2 45 31 0 26 48 2 1 1 23 5 0 41 33 32 7 297
4:55 PM 4 61 37 0 13 36 2 1 7 13 2 0 36 38 32 5 287 3517 5:00 PM 3 42 36 0 25 43 7 1 4 24 4 0 48 36 41 3 317 3558 5:05 PM 3 26 37 0 20 47 4 1 7 22 2 0 66 37 47 5 324 3551 5:10 PM 1 48 39 0 34 66 8 1 5 15 4 0 36 26 29 3 315 3567 5:15 PM 6 37 30 0 20 39 3 0 4 22 1 0 54 36 43 2 297 3542 5:20 PM 2 66 45 0 20 54 8 0 11 17 3 0 38 31 28 6 329 3571 5:25 PM 5 42 48 0 23 27 8 0 9 22 4 0 66 47 39 2 342 3613 5:30 PM 1 50 31 0 23 43 0 0 9 22 4 0 53 36 33 6 311 3678 5:35 PM 4 36 40 0 38 42 4 2 10 21 3 0 58 62 40 3 363 3754 5:40 PM 4 77 49 0 26 45 2 2 7 22 6 0 48 34 30 3 355 3834 5:45 PM 3 33 41 0 18 29 4 0 7 20 2 0 53 45 30 4 289 3826 5:50 PM 0 57 51 0 28 46 6 0 13 27 1 0 43 29 42 5 348 3877 5:55 PM 6 36 29 1 19 21 7 0 6 19 3 0 67 53 42 2 311 3901 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 36 652 480 0 348 520 24 16 104 260 52 0 636 528 412 48 4116 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 16 0 0 28
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Washington Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723521 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
947 141
374 478 95
1250 0 141 1085
2017 0.92 638
2373 356 306 2588
238 0 475
1139 713
Peak-Hour: 7:35 AM -- 8:35 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:50 AM -- 8:05 AM

3.7 0.7

4.5 3.3 2.1

3.1 0 0.7 2.5

3.4 2.4

3.2 2.2 3.6 3.3

2.9 0 3.2

3.1 3.1
1 1 0
1 0 0 0
0 0
0 2
1 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Washington Blvd
(Northbound)
Washington Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 8 0 22 0 3 18 19 0 0 97 16 0 8 26 11 0 228
7:05 AM 19 0 29 0 4 23 24 0 0 118 31 0 23 20 9 0 300
7:10 AM 7 0 28 0 6 25 25 0 0 118 28 0 8 18 10 0 273
7:15 AM 5 0 20 0 2 26 16 0 0 125 29 0 27 32 17 0 299
7:20 AM 9 0 34 0 5 45 24 0 0 120 38 0 11 17 8 0 311
7:25 AM 19 0 30 0 2 28 33 0 0 159 38 0 26 33 7 0 375
7:30 AM 10 0 29 0 2 38 30 0 0 187 28 0 18 33 11 0 386
7:35 AM 20 0 38 0 5 22 23 0 0 172 49 0 19 46 17 0 411
7:40 AM 15 0 40 0 8 40 32 0 0 166 23 0 19 47 13 0 403
7:45 AM 24 0 44 0 8 31 33 0 0 123 22 0 32 55 13 1 386
7:50 AM 12 0 58 0 7 48 31 0 0 227 20 0 23 59 17 0 502
7:55 AM 26 0 48 0 6 39 35 0 0 165 28 0 25 51 13 0 436 4310 8:00 AM 17 0 43 0 7 53 33 0 0 207 19 0 21 45 10 0 455 4537 8:05 AM 19 0 30 0 2 33 28 0 0 174 44 0 30 52 3 0 415 4652 8:10 AM 16 0 42 0 11 53 33 0 0 174 35 0 22 44 12 0 442 4821 8:15 AM 28 0 51 0 11 36 22 0 0 161 34 0 35 75 12 0 465 4987 8:20 AM 17 0 24 0 16 47 33 0 0 158 19 0 23 57 13 0 407 5083 8:25 AM 23 0 34 0 7 32 38 0 0 129 40 0 36 50 8 0 397 5105 8:30 AM 21 0 23 0 7 44 33 0 0 161 23 0 20 57 10 0 399 5118 8:35 AM 22 0 41 0 3 25 31 0 0 135 30 0 28 50 12 0 377 5084 8:40 AM 10 0 30 0 7 33 29 0 0 142 33 0 22 37 8 0 351 5032 8:45 AM 19 0 27 0 7 15 22 0 0 136 45 0 26 42 10 0 349 4995 8:50 AM 15 0 22 0 10 26 33 0 0 125 27 0 16 30 7 0 311 4804 8:55 AM 17 0 19 0 7 21 24 0 0 157 34 0 16 40 11 0 346 4714 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 220 0 596 0 80 560 396 0 0 2396 268 0 276 620 160 0 5572 Heavy Trucks 12 0 28 0 12 16 0 76 4 4 12 0 164
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Washington Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723522 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
991 222
465 355 171
2009 0 221 1537
1932 0.96 1003
2191 259 313 2666
541 1 563
927 1105
Peak-Hour: 4:55 PM -- 5:55 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:10 PM -- 5:25 PM

2.3 1.4

2.8 2.3 1.2

1.2 0 1.4 1

1.4 1.1

1.3 0.8 0.6 1.4

0.2 0 1.4

1.3 0.8
1 2 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
1 0
2 0
0 0 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Washington Blvd
(Northbound)
Washington Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 35 0 47 0 12 50 40 0 0 108 15 0 19 73 6 0 405
4:05 PM 53 0 54 0 9 32 66 0 0 74 23 0 23 81 19 0 434
4:10 PM 38 0 34 0 18 45 47 0 0 87 9 0 14 49 14 0 355
4:15 PM 51 0 65 0 11 27 48 0 0 80 8 0 15 81 10 0 396
4:20 PM 35 0 32 0 8 45 56 0 0 91 5 0 12 63 13 0 360
4:25 PM 53 0 54 0 9 29 51 0 0 87 10 0 32 89 12 0 426
4:30 PM 35 0 39 0 9 40 48 0 0 97 7 0 21 60 15 0 371
4:35 PM 44 0 55 0 6 27 37 0 0 52 11 0 38 65 26 0 361
4:40 PM 26 0 43 0 8 34 25 0 0 120 11 0 32 57 16 0 372
4:45 PM 39 0 65 0 5 31 31 0 0 99 19 0 25 88 16 0 418
4:50 PM 25 0 23 0 17 34 37 0 0 186 18 0 21 54 19 0 434
4:55 PM 57 0 51 0 16 17 57 0 0 156 21 0 25 71 25 0 496 4828 5:00 PM 33 0 48 0 20 32 45 0 0 177 19 0 19 76 20 0 489 4912 5:05 PM 60 0 65 0 12 17 37 0 0 149 20 0 35 90 18 0 503 4981 5:10 PM 37 0 37 0 15 38 39 0 0 193 20 0 19 95 23 0 516 5142 5:15 PM 50 0 46 0 9 28 43 0 0 148 22 0 33 96 24 0 499 5245 5:20 PM 37 0 49 0 14 35 35 0 0 184 34 0 19 83 19 0 509 5394 5:25 PM 57 1 48 0 8 33 38 0 0 139 23 0 36 94 12 0 489 5457 5:30 PM 32 0 50 0 22 32 38 0 0 120 16 0 28 87 16 0 441 5527 5:35 PM 58 0 48 0 11 19 31 0 0 150 17 0 34 80 17 0 465 5631 5:40 PM 37 0 28 0 20 43 36 0 0 199 25 0 20 84 12 0 504 5763 5:45 PM 51 0 54 0 9 21 28 0 0 155 22 0 31 80 22 0 473 5818 5:50 PM 32 0 39 0 15 40 38 0 0 162 20 0 14 67 13 0 440 5824 5:55 PM 49 0 51 0 8 22 20 0 0 98 19 0 24 61 30 0 382 5710 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 496 0 528 0 152 404 468 0 0 2100 304 0 284 1096 264 0 6096 Heavy Trucks 0 0 8 4 8 20 0 20 0 0 4 0 64
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Westbrook Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723523 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
272 210
11 142 119
71 0 70 356
58 0.82 39
113 55 247 559
22 137 385
445 544
Peak-Hour: 7:10 AM -- 8:10 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AM
4 11

9.1 4.9 2.5

21.1 0 10 5.9

17.2 30.8

11.5 5.5 0.8 3.6

9.1 11.7 1.8

2.7 4.6
4 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Westbrook Blvd
(Northbound)
Westbrook Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 2 12 16 0 10 4 0 0 0 2 3 0 11 1 10 0 71
7:05 AM 1 9 11 0 6 10 1 0 0 3 4 0 15 3 5 0 68
7:10 AM 1 9 19 1 8 4 4 3 0 8 7 0 11 2 7 0 84
7:15 AM 0 11 22 0 15 12 4 0 0 12 7 0 7 4 5 0 99
7:20 AM 0 12 22 0 25 25 0 0 0 8 9 0 23 2 5 0 131
7:25 AM 1 8 20 0 12 30 1 0 0 6 6 0 28 2 1 0 115
7:30 AM 3 15 32 0 12 21 0 0 0 8 5 0 30 2 11 0 139
7:35 AM 1 11 51 0 10 17 0 0 0 3 8 0 32 1 5 0 139
7:40 AM 3 21 50 0 2 7 0 0 0 3 3 0 15 4 8 0 116
7:45 AM 3 24 69 0 8 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 2 4 0 126
7:50 AM 3 12 48 0 1 1 1 0 0 4 4 0 20 3 8 0 105
7:55 AM 2 6 22 0 6 4 1 0 0 3 4 0 25 5 6 0 84 1277
8:00 AM 1 6 14 0 7 6 0 0 0 1 2 0 30 7 4 0 78 1284
8:05 AM 3 2 16 0 10 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 17 5 6 0 69 1285
8:10 AM 1 6 14 0 8 3 0 0 0 6 4 0 9 4 6 0 61 1262
8:15 AM 1 3 14 0 7 4 0 0 0 3 3 0 10 8 5 0 58 1221
8:20 AM 1 7 6 0 9 7 0 0 0 5 2 0 12 3 4 0 56 1146
8:25 AM 2 4 6 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 1 0 9 4 7 0 44 1075
8:30 AM 2 7 14 0 6 6 1 0 0 5 3 0 6 3 4 0 57 993
8:35 AM 0 3 17 0 7 9 1 0 0 9 2 0 7 1 7 0 63 917
8:40 AM 2 9 18 0 9 5 0 0 1 6 0 0 8 4 4 0 66 867
8:45 AM 0 2 12 0 10 4 1 0 0 4 2 0 6 2 5 0 48 789
8:50 AM 2 3 16 0 7 4 0 0 0 4 3 0 8 3 3 0 53 737
8:55 AM 0 7 25 0 12 5 0 0 0 3 1 0 14 7 8 0 82 735
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 28 188 532 0 96 180 0 0 0 56 64 0 308 28 96 0 1576 Heavy Trucks 4 20 0 0 12 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 44
Buses
Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Westbrook Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723524 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
120 145
5 37 78
73 3 88 355
32 0.81 39
74 39 228 347
30 54 237
305 321
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM

0.8 0.7
0 0 1.3
0 0 1.1 0.6
0 0

1.4 2.6 0.4 0.6
0 0 0.4

0.7 0.3
7 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4
0 1
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Westbrook Blvd
(Northbound)
Westbrook Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 2 16 0 6 10 0 0 0 1 1 0 24 2 2 0 64
4:05 PM 2 6 22 0 3 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 15 4 4 0 65
4:10 PM 1 5 19 0 7 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 21 5 4 0 67
4:15 PM 1 5 22 0 6 8 0 0 0 2 2 0 17 8 6 0 77
4:20 PM 0 7 19 0 9 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 18 5 5 0 70
4:25 PM 1 5 22 1 3 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 26 7 10 1 83
4:30 PM 1 4 19 1 9 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 19 2 4 0 68
4:35 PM 1 8 19 0 8 5 0 0 0 2 1 0 27 0 5 0 76
4:40 PM 4 4 17 0 4 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 4 11 0 65
4:45 PM 3 2 13 0 8 6 0 0 0 2 1 0 18 1 10 0 64
4:50 PM 1 3 10 0 11 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 21 3 8 0 64
4:55 PM 3 3 13 0 10 6 0 0 0 3 2 0 16 2 6 0 64 827
5:00 PM 2 3 17 0 6 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 14 2 9 0 63 826
5:05 PM 2 1 20 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 15 2 8 0 62 823
5:10 PM 0 3 16 0 8 7 0 0 0 1 5 0 18 2 3 0 63 819
5:15 PM 6 7 21 0 7 5 0 0 0 4 6 0 12 4 3 0 75 817
5:20 PM 4 8 20 0 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 20 4 4 0 69 816
5:25 PM 1 3 22 0 7 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 18 2 10 0 69 802
5:30 PM 3 7 24 0 3 3 1 0 0 3 5 0 20 5 8 0 82 816
5:35 PM 5 5 27 0 12 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 23 7 10 0 97 837
5:40 PM 1 5 19 0 4 2 1 0 0 4 4 0 33 5 10 0 88 860
5:45 PM 4 5 16 0 8 3 1 0 3 3 7 0 14 2 4 0 70 866
5:50 PM 1 2 18 0 6 1 1 0 0 5 1 0 21 1 9 0 66 868
5:55 PM 0 5 17 1 3 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 20 3 10 0 66 870
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 36 68 280 0 76 28 8 0 0 36 52 0 304 68 112 0 1068 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8
Buses
Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Westbrook Blvd -- Pleasant Grove Blvd QC JOB #: 16723525 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
617 354
55 297 265
229 50 119 339
183 0.79 140
266 33 80 575
36 185 111
396 332
Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AM

4.1 5.6
0 7.1 1.5

2.2 2 2.5 2.1

2.2 2.1

3.8 15.2 1.3 1.4

5.6 8.6 0

6.8 5.4
1 1 27
2 0 2 0
1 2
4 0
0 0
0 4 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Westbrook Blvd
(Northbound)
Westbrook Blvd
(Southbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Eastbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 4 15 4 0 12 15 1 0 0 6 2 0 6 5 7 2 79
7:05 AM 4 11 4 0 13 20 2 0 4 9 4 0 9 5 4 1 90
7:10 AM 3 13 5 0 10 24 1 0 0 4 4 0 6 6 10 1 87
7:15 AM 1 14 10 0 21 38 2 0 0 9 2 0 6 9 8 3 123
7:20 AM 5 10 10 0 24 19 10 0 1 17 1 0 12 26 11 1 147
7:25 AM 5 20 13 1 18 37 13 0 3 12 2 0 2 16 9 2 153
7:30 AM 5 23 9 0 27 29 12 0 13 15 5 0 4 14 6 4 166
7:35 AM 3 21 12 2 26 19 4 0 6 34 6 0 3 8 10 1 155
7:40 AM 7 28 11 0 22 46 1 0 10 20 6 0 4 3 11 1 170
7:45 AM 1 20 13 0 21 14 3 0 9 15 1 0 5 11 9 1 123
7:50 AM 0 11 9 0 28 26 4 0 1 9 0 0 2 5 10 1 106
7:55 AM 1 11 4 0 13 21 2 1 0 11 4 0 5 21 6 1 101 1500
8:00 AM 3 11 6 0 20 19 2 0 0 15 0 0 4 11 16 1 108 1529
8:05 AM 2 6 9 0 23 14 1 0 2 9 2 1 8 7 6 0 90 1529
8:10 AM 0 10 5 0 21 15 1 0 4 17 4 0 8 9 17 1 112 1554
8:15 AM 1 10 9 1 11 11 0 0 1 18 2 0 10 9 5 1 89 1520
8:20 AM 1 11 4 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 1 0 1 4 8 0 60 1433
8:25 AM 0 5 7 0 10 13 1 0 0 13 0 0 2 12 5 1 69 1349
8:30 AM 1 5 5 0 6 9 1 0 2 8 2 0 2 8 15 4 68 1251
8:35 AM 0 6 2 1 11 8 1 0 3 12 4 0 4 7 8 0 67 1163
8:40 AM 1 6 3 0 12 11 1 0 2 9 1 0 1 0 6 0 53 1046
8:45 AM 0 8 3 0 16 7 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 3 6 0 55 978
8:50 AM 0 3 1 0 10 6 1 0 0 9 1 0 2 14 9 0 56 928
8:55 AM 1 6 6 0 16 10 0 0 1 8 0 0 3 6 6 0 63 890
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 60 288 128 8 300 376 68 0 116 276 68 0 44 100 108 24 1964 Heavy Trucks 8 12 0 0 20 0 4 4 16 0 4 4 72
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 28 28
Bicycles 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 16
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Westbrook Blvd -- Pleasant Grove Blvd QC JOB #: 16723526 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
336 348
17 137 182
176 14 174 392
119 0.95 132
158 25 86 383
31 160 67
237 258
Peak-Hour: 4:10 PM -- 5:10 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM

3.6 2.3
0 6.6 1.6

2.3 14.3 0.6 1

0.8 2.3

2.5 4 0 1.3

3.2 3.1 1.5

4.2 2.7
0 0 2
0 2 4 3
0 2
0 1
2 3
1 3 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Westbrook Blvd
(Northbound)
Westbrook Blvd
(Southbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Eastbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 2 18 5 0 11 12 2 0 0 10 6 0 5 8 8 0 87
4:05 PM 1 14 5 1 13 9 6 0 3 8 5 0 5 13 14 0 97
4:10 PM 0 16 6 0 13 8 0 0 0 16 1 0 2 16 16 0 94
4:15 PM 3 10 4 2 12 10 2 0 1 11 1 0 4 9 17 2 88
4:20 PM 4 12 9 0 15 11 1 0 5 9 5 0 7 10 9 3 100
4:25 PM 4 12 5 0 18 8 4 0 0 8 2 0 3 6 12 2 84
4:30 PM 0 18 5 0 17 10 0 0 0 15 0 0 7 10 12 1 95
4:35 PM 2 15 4 0 9 19 2 0 2 15 2 0 9 21 15 0 115
4:40 PM 3 10 5 0 18 13 0 0 1 5 1 0 5 10 19 2 92
4:45 PM 4 15 7 0 13 9 0 0 2 3 3 0 5 10 10 0 81
4:50 PM 1 10 9 1 16 13 2 0 0 11 2 0 5 6 19 0 95
4:55 PM 2 11 3 1 17 12 1 0 1 10 3 0 7 10 12 3 93 1121
5:00 PM 3 16 5 0 6 15 2 0 1 9 2 0 7 14 20 1 101 1135
5:05 PM 1 15 5 0 28 9 3 0 1 7 3 0 10 10 13 1 106 1144
5:10 PM 1 11 6 0 11 8 1 0 3 8 1 0 8 9 14 4 85 1135
5:15 PM 2 16 6 0 14 9 2 0 2 9 1 0 5 4 11 1 82 1129
5:20 PM 0 8 8 0 13 15 5 0 1 10 1 0 4 9 10 3 87 1116
5:25 PM 3 12 5 0 14 6 0 0 1 8 0 0 6 17 15 1 88 1120
5:30 PM 1 17 3 0 13 8 2 0 0 13 1 0 4 10 11 4 87 1112
5:35 PM 3 6 7 0 13 13 1 0 0 10 6 0 6 9 14 1 89 1086
5:40 PM 1 11 7 0 5 10 2 0 3 5 0 0 2 12 25 0 83 1077
5:45 PM 2 22 4 0 13 10 1 1 0 6 2 0 7 10 17 0 95 1091
5:50 PM 4 13 3 0 16 11 1 0 1 3 2 0 8 16 12 3 93 1089
5:55 PM 4 13 5 0 16 11 0 0 0 7 4 0 5 10 17 0 92 1088
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 20 172 56 0 176 168 8 0 12 140 12 0 84 164 184 12 1208 Heavy Trucks 4 0 4 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 32
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 20
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fiddyment Rd -- Pleasant Grove Blvd QC JOB #: 16723527 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
1038 718
69 806 163
446 77 83 568
719 0.89 193
1072 276 292 1329
190 558 445
1378 1193
Peak-Hour: 7:10 AM -- 8:10 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:35 AM -- 7:50 AM

4.6 7.5

4.3 4.6 4.9

5.2 3.9 7.2 4.4

0.7 2.6

0.8 0.4 4.8 2.3

7.9 8.1 3.8

3.8 6.5
0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 1 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fiddyment Rd
(Northbound)
Fiddyment Rd
(Southbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Eastbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 12 28 24 1 4 71 3 0 2 24 26 0 18 11 1 0 225
7:05 AM 10 34 30 0 4 80 2 0 7 30 24 0 15 18 0 0 254
7:10 AM 12 33 27 0 5 69 5 0 6 49 15 0 20 23 9 0 273
7:15 AM 22 50 35 1 9 63 4 0 3 39 32 0 18 11 11 0 298
7:20 AM 17 51 39 1 7 69 4 0 9 45 20 0 22 14 4 0 302
7:25 AM 18 53 33 0 13 67 4 0 3 51 24 0 19 18 7 0 310
7:30 AM 18 50 54 0 17 55 5 0 4 61 20 0 25 19 6 0 334
7:35 AM 11 50 44 0 12 76 10 0 8 85 24 0 25 12 5 0 362
7:40 AM 10 59 48 1 16 80 7 0 6 83 26 0 22 12 5 1 376
7:45 AM 13 42 55 0 13 79 3 0 15 58 29 0 25 16 3 0 351
7:50 AM 21 42 27 1 24 63 10 0 10 73 17 0 35 25 11 1 360 7:55 AM 20 53 31 1 19 70 7 0 5 62 23 0 27 16 7 0 341 3786 8:00 AM 9 47 22 0 19 56 7 0 4 60 17 0 30 16 6 0 293 3854 8:05 AM 13 28 30 1 9 59 3 0 4 53 29 0 22 11 9 0 271 3871 8:10 AM 21 52 31 0 13 38 3 0 2 35 22 0 18 24 3 0 262 3860 8:15 AM 14 39 40 1 12 67 5 0 1 44 17 0 18 17 5 0 280 3842 8:20 AM 5 53 28 0 5 56 7 0 5 43 20 0 26 15 5 0 268 3808 8:25 AM 18 56 40 1 13 51 1 0 6 37 23 0 20 29 1 0 296 3794 8:30 AM 16 48 38 1 7 59 4 1 4 50 16 0 20 21 2 1 288 3748 8:35 AM 9 60 36 1 8 50 0 1 5 37 19 0 29 21 6 0 282 3668 8:40 AM 10 41 40 1 13 46 3 0 5 62 20 0 19 19 9 0 288 3580 8:45 AM 15 51 38 0 13 48 1 1 4 52 18 0 24 16 7 0 288 3517 8:50 AM 10 39 40 0 12 43 3 0 5 40 7 0 25 32 6 0 262 3419 8:55 AM 8 60 42 2 10 50 0 0 4 43 6 0 15 17 4 0 261 3339 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 136 604 588 4 164 940 80 0 116 904 316 0 288 160 52 4 4356 Heavy Trucks 12 64 4 8 24 8 0 0 0 16 0 8 144
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fiddyment Rd -- Pleasant Grove Blvd QC JOB #: 16723528 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
1034 1079
89 783 162
1108 79 122 1229
480 0.95 656
839 280 451 1094
386 872 458
1537 1716
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM

2.3 1
0 3.1 0

0.2 0 0 0.8
1 0.3

0.8 0.7 1.8 1
0 1.3 1.3

2.2 1
2 0 0
1 0 2 0
0 1
3 1
0 0
0 0 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fiddyment Rd
(Northbound)
Fiddyment Rd
(Southbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Eastbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 28 77 31 1 20 68 5 0 5 42 13 0 30 46 13 0 379
4:05 PM 21 75 41 1 12 70 6 0 7 38 23 0 25 48 8 0 375
4:10 PM 33 71 56 2 18 66 8 1 6 43 14 0 38 42 12 0 410
4:15 PM 17 58 35 2 9 66 4 0 5 29 22 0 53 50 14 2 366
4:20 PM 31 54 29 3 11 51 2 0 4 47 21 0 27 38 10 0 328
4:25 PM 27 72 49 2 20 54 5 1 4 33 9 0 41 54 11 0 382
4:30 PM 29 69 43 5 12 75 5 0 5 27 9 0 38 47 8 1 373
4:35 PM 28 50 32 1 8 58 6 0 6 45 28 0 43 35 2 0 342
4:40 PM 30 55 40 0 12 44 5 0 5 65 12 0 32 63 17 0 380
4:45 PM 32 74 53 4 11 60 10 0 5 41 24 0 39 39 8 1 401
4:50 PM 29 84 36 1 11 79 8 0 8 22 17 0 35 34 11 0 375
4:55 PM 25 45 39 1 13 50 7 0 5 44 18 0 59 58 8 0 372 4483 5:00 PM 35 52 32 2 12 44 4 0 3 57 27 0 42 57 12 0 379 4483 5:05 PM 20 68 31 1 14 64 10 0 7 54 21 0 31 44 7 0 372 4480 5:10 PM 19 65 39 2 13 75 6 0 3 30 27 0 39 50 16 0 384 4454 5:15 PM 28 75 40 1 14 75 5 0 8 41 21 0 35 49 9 0 401 4489 5:20 PM 39 95 38 5 10 76 8 1 8 20 25 0 45 64 17 0 451 4612 5:25 PM 40 64 31 1 18 71 7 2 10 39 16 0 44 43 3 0 389 4619 5:30 PM 31 84 40 2 11 73 8 0 11 40 22 0 39 52 7 0 420 4666 5:35 PM 43 73 38 1 11 78 6 0 1 52 23 0 27 63 14 0 430 4754 5:40 PM 28 63 39 1 8 41 6 1 8 50 29 0 50 88 9 0 421 4795 5:45 PM 21 54 27 4 19 63 11 2 10 35 25 0 33 44 6 0 354 4748 5:50 PM 21 78 57 1 14 69 10 0 7 38 28 0 42 58 8 0 431 4804 5:55 PM 38 101 46 2 12 54 8 0 3 24 16 0 24 44 14 0 386 4818 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 408 880 468 16 120 768 80 4 80 568 296 0 464 812 120 0 5084 Heavy Trucks 0 4 4 0 44 0 0 4 4 8 4 0 72
Buses
Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4
Bicycles 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Washington Blvd -- Pleasant Grove Blvd QC JOB #: 16723529 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
879 928
199 559 121
1125 246 76 1047
1596 0.89 760
2083 241 211 1956
161 611 232
1004 1004
Peak-Hour: 7:35 AM -- 8:35 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM

4.1 1.6

4.5 2.5 10.7

4.3 2 0 2.9

1.8 3.7

1.9 2.1 0.9 2.4

6.8 1.6 1.7

2.1 2.5
4 0 12
0 0 0 0
1 1
2 0
0 0
0 6 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Washington Blvd
(Northbound)
Washington Blvd
(Southbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Eastbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 4 24 9 0 4 13 8 0 11 69 4 0 6 48 1 1 202
7:05 AM 4 16 11 0 4 12 9 0 14 89 9 0 8 49 2 0 227
7:10 AM 12 26 21 0 8 38 10 0 8 76 17 0 5 39 1 1 262
7:15 AM 9 22 15 0 4 6 16 0 21 117 12 0 12 63 2 2 301
7:20 AM 5 28 14 0 7 40 6 0 16 88 16 1 12 41 1 0 275
7:25 AM 11 42 22 0 5 29 10 0 32 138 15 0 4 61 4 2 375
7:30 AM 7 56 29 0 1 37 16 0 23 79 7 0 19 48 3 0 325
7:35 AM 13 54 23 0 6 39 14 0 50 156 21 0 11 61 8 0 456
7:40 AM 19 85 22 0 9 52 20 0 21 99 17 0 19 59 9 1 432
7:45 AM 9 57 29 0 13 35 23 0 29 144 4 0 10 97 10 0 460
7:50 AM 15 87 20 0 8 65 29 0 19 113 21 0 31 64 9 0 481
7:55 AM 23 60 25 0 6 37 19 0 23 173 13 0 13 62 6 0 460 4256 8:00 AM 9 56 12 0 10 67 18 0 20 118 27 0 26 55 6 0 424 4478 8:05 AM 17 32 14 0 2 32 17 0 9 156 32 0 11 69 8 0 399 4650 8:10 AM 11 41 14 0 17 54 17 0 14 107 32 0 28 56 3 1 395 4783 8:15 AM 11 32 21 0 10 40 7 0 18 151 24 2 6 68 3 0 393 4875 8:20 AM 14 46 17 0 12 54 12 0 13 116 22 0 22 57 5 2 392 4992 8:25 AM 6 25 17 0 9 34 16 0 18 154 18 0 10 72 4 0 383 5000 8:30 AM 14 36 18 0 19 50 7 0 7 109 10 3 17 40 5 3 338 5013 8:35 AM 10 18 18 0 11 26 11 0 15 156 11 1 8 63 3 1 352 4909 8:40 AM 8 21 17 0 11 41 18 0 8 120 17 0 23 38 6 0 328 4805 8:45 AM 7 21 35 0 6 30 11 0 13 179 13 0 13 84 7 0 419 4764 8:50 AM 17 20 12 0 14 38 12 0 9 100 14 0 19 47 6 1 309 4592 8:55 AM 20 16 19 0 2 22 9 0 15 116 14 1 17 67 3 0 321 4453 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 188 816 296 0 108 548 284 0 284 1720 152 0 216 892 100 0 5604 Heavy Trucks 24 16 4 8 4 20 0 24 0 0 24 0 124
Buses
Pedestrians 0 8 0 32 40
Bicycles 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 16
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Washington Blvd -- Pleasant Grove Blvd QC JOB #: 16723530 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
1160 701
312 685 163
2121 248 95 2084
1687 0.98 1600
2157 222 389 2146
190 377 287
1287 854
Peak-Hour: 4:25 PM -- 5:25 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:45 PM -- 5:00 PM

1.9 1

0.6 2 3.7

0.9 0.8 1.1 0.9

0.9 0.9
1 1.8 0.5 1.1

1.1 1.1 0.3

1.6 0.8
0 2 1
1 0 0 0
2 0
2 3
0 1
1 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Washington Blvd
(Northbound)
Washington Blvd
(Southbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Eastbound)
Pleasant Grove Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 16 23 22 0 21 56 22 0 11 86 13 0 28 130 6 1 435 4:05 PM 19 32 27 0 15 45 20 0 18 149 13 0 27 144 0 2 511 4:10 PM 23 32 25 2 23 69 28 0 10 90 8 0 26 127 2 3 468
4:15 PM 21 37 24 0 10 32 17 0 13 143 14 1 15 151 4 0 482 4:20 PM 16 39 19 0 11 41 25 0 11 108 11 0 41 157 7 2 488 4:25 PM 18 19 26 0 12 52 23 0 11 190 19 2 19 174 6 0 571 4:30 PM 14 35 23 0 22 71 24 0 15 107 12 0 34 109 2 1 469 4:35 PM 16 22 33 0 10 50 31 0 20 152 22 2 16 122 2 0 498 4:40 PM 9 33 28 0 10 53 28 0 14 123 31 2 43 151 1 1 527 4:45 PM 19 22 19 0 20 44 27 0 29 165 16 2 26 132 5 1 527 4:50 PM 16 41 24 0 12 52 23 0 18 128 11 3 37 123 19 0 507 4:55 PM 12 37 22 0 16 64 20 0 27 152 15 1 42 141 10 2 561 6044 5:00 PM 17 40 15 0 11 56 26 0 21 146 20 2 28 115 11 2 510 6119 5:05 PM 22 29 19 0 16 56 22 0 17 137 20 1 33 134 4 1 511 6119 5:10 PM 18 41 28 0 5 73 36 0 20 124 14 0 38 116 10 1 524 6175 5:15 PM 15 31 24 0 16 66 30 0 18 130 19 1 29 143 15 0 537 6230 5:20 PM 14 27 26 0 13 48 22 0 19 133 23 3 35 140 10 0 513 6255 5:25 PM 12 35 25 0 11 54 25 0 22 122 17 3 35 150 9 1 521 6205 5:30 PM 17 51 25 0 9 53 21 0 13 110 17 0 22 153 3 1 495 6231 5:35 PM 15 26 17 0 17 56 23 0 13 108 13 1 26 146 3 1 465 6198 5:40 PM 14 35 18 0 12 36 31 0 16 126 14 0 23 138 11 0 474 6145 5:45 PM 21 37 27 0 13 35 24 0 18 119 14 0 23 136 7 0 474 6092 5:50 PM 20 38 20 0 10 43 28 0 17 114 9 0 20 132 5 0 456 6041 5:55 PM 21 35 16 0 12 42 14 0 14 98 8 1 31 138 4 1 435 5915 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 188 400 260 0 192 640 280 0 296 1780 168 24 420 1584 136 12 6380 Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 8 16 0 0 24 4 0 16 0 80
Buses
Pedestrians 4 0 4 4 12
Bicycles 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave -- Baseline Rd QC JOB #: 16723531 CITY/STATE: Placer, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
216 85
53 134 29
760 8 18 1089
296 0.91 667
337 33 404 610
41 59 285
572 385
Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:10 AM -- 7:25 AM

4.2 11.8

1.9 4.5 6.9

3.8 12.5 5.6 2.9

14.5 3.1

13.6 6.1 2.5 12.6

17.1 13.6 11.2

3.1 12.2
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave
(Northbound)
Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 2 6 23 0 2 9 3 0 0 27 2 0 29 66 2 0 171
7:05 AM 2 7 23 0 3 13 8 0 2 19 5 0 20 50 2 0 154
7:10 AM 7 4 23 0 3 12 5 0 0 32 3 0 49 80 1 0 219
7:15 AM 6 7 23 0 3 10 3 0 1 21 0 0 22 59 2 0 157
7:20 AM 0 1 22 0 2 13 5 0 2 37 2 0 38 57 0 0 179
7:25 AM 2 6 30 0 4 11 2 0 0 22 4 0 29 38 3 0 151
7:30 AM 5 2 34 0 4 10 5 0 2 32 3 0 34 60 1 0 192
7:35 AM 5 4 25 0 2 12 4 0 0 19 2 0 29 54 5 0 161
7:40 AM 4 3 24 0 0 12 4 0 1 21 3 0 43 39 0 0 154
7:45 AM 3 4 14 0 2 9 3 0 0 19 1 0 42 57 1 0 155
7:50 AM 3 9 24 1 1 12 4 0 0 31 7 0 41 45 0 0 178
7:55 AM 1 6 20 0 3 11 7 0 0 16 1 0 28 62 1 0 156 2027
8:00 AM 6 1 21 0 2 5 4 0 0 31 3 0 28 52 1 0 154 2010
8:05 AM 4 3 23 0 3 17 4 0 1 17 7 0 19 55 3 0 156 2012
8:10 AM 1 4 22 0 2 5 7 0 2 32 7 0 31 45 2 0 160 1953
8:15 AM 0 7 27 0 3 15 6 0 2 20 2 0 28 50 2 0 162 1958
8:20 AM 4 3 18 0 3 6 6 0 4 28 8 0 15 33 4 0 132 1911
8:25 AM 0 7 16 0 2 9 0 0 1 26 4 0 16 39 0 0 120 1880
8:30 AM 0 8 17 0 1 6 2 0 3 22 6 0 21 40 2 0 128 1816
8:35 AM 5 7 15 0 2 2 1 0 1 25 5 0 25 32 0 0 120 1775
8:40 AM 2 2 14 0 1 9 4 0 1 15 2 0 28 42 1 0 121 1742
8:45 AM 1 6 23 0 0 6 3 0 2 36 4 0 18 35 2 0 136 1723
8:50 AM 5 4 24 0 1 6 4 0 2 22 1 0 27 33 2 0 131 1676
8:55 AM 3 3 12 0 3 4 4 0 0 19 5 0 21 35 1 0 110 1630
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 52 48 272 0 32 140 52 0 12 360 20 0 436 784 12 0 2220 Heavy Trucks 16 4 36 0 0 4 0 64 4 12 28 0 168
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave -- Baseline Rd QC JOB #: 16723532 CITY/STATE: Placer, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
108 174
29 56 23
545 38 33 783
720 0.93 458
807 49 292 1092
58 103 349
397 510
Peak-Hour: 4:40 PM -- 5:40 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:40 PM -- 4:55 PM

3.7 1.1

3.4 5.4 0

4.6 2.6 3 4.3

1.8 5

1.7 0 3.4 1.6

1.7 0 1.1

3.3 1
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave
(Northbound)
Santucci Blvd/Watt Ave
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 5 4 33 0 3 3 7 0 2 58 3 0 26 37 2 0 183
4:05 PM 5 7 31 0 1 5 5 0 3 49 3 0 22 36 4 0 171
4:10 PM 4 8 21 0 2 5 6 0 1 54 8 0 28 41 1 0 179
4:15 PM 6 4 24 0 4 4 7 0 3 73 4 0 14 39 4 0 186
4:20 PM 4 7 21 0 2 7 3 0 0 59 2 0 12 37 1 0 155
4:25 PM 7 11 26 0 2 3 3 0 4 57 4 0 27 30 4 0 178
4:30 PM 4 11 36 0 1 3 4 0 6 56 4 0 20 44 7 0 196
4:35 PM 4 6 31 0 2 3 2 0 2 46 5 0 27 31 2 0 161
4:40 PM 5 10 26 0 4 4 2 0 1 71 6 0 35 46 6 0 216
4:45 PM 3 7 29 0 4 6 2 0 5 55 10 0 29 32 1 0 183
4:50 PM 3 8 32 0 3 4 2 0 5 65 2 0 19 50 0 0 193
4:55 PM 7 8 25 0 4 1 2 0 3 58 3 0 30 38 4 0 183 2184
5:00 PM 5 8 29 0 1 3 1 0 2 61 4 0 17 35 1 0 167 2168
5:05 PM 3 6 16 0 2 2 3 0 2 65 3 0 21 48 3 0 174 2171
5:10 PM 8 9 32 0 2 0 2 0 4 59 3 0 25 38 3 0 185 2177
5:15 PM 3 6 38 0 2 6 4 0 4 57 3 0 20 38 2 0 183 2174
5:20 PM 5 6 25 0 0 5 6 0 5 68 6 0 15 35 7 0 183 2202
5:25 PM 5 19 31 0 0 5 1 0 3 60 3 0 22 29 4 0 182 2206
5:30 PM 1 8 32 0 0 6 2 0 2 57 2 0 21 31 1 0 163 2173
5:35 PM 10 8 34 0 1 14 2 0 2 44 4 0 38 38 1 0 196 2208
5:40 PM 6 8 34 0 3 5 2 0 0 73 2 0 15 29 4 0 181 2173
5:45 PM 4 3 32 0 1 5 3 0 2 62 2 0 23 33 5 0 175 2165
5:50 PM 6 11 31 0 0 2 2 0 1 50 1 0 24 24 6 0 158 2130
5:55 PM 9 12 23 0 4 6 5 0 5 76 7 0 11 21 1 0 180 2127
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 44 100 348 0 44 56 24 0 44 764 72 0 332 512 28 0 2368 Heavy Trucks 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 28 0 16 28 0 88
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Westbrook Blvd -- Baseline Rd QC JOB #: 16723533 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
493 209
342 0 151
1091 132 77 826
493 0.95 749
625 0 0 644
0 0 0
0 0
Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:00 AM -- 7:15 AM

3.2 15.3

2.3 0 5.3

3.6 20.5 6.5 4.4
12 4.1

13.8 0 0 10.4
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Westbrook Blvd
(Northbound)
Westbrook Blvd
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 13 0 36 0 20 37 0 0 0 55 3 0 164
7:05 AM 0 0 0 0 6 0 34 0 14 34 0 0 0 79 10 0 177
7:10 AM 0 0 0 0 9 0 35 0 19 34 0 0 0 64 9 0 170
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 39 0 19 31 0 0 0 48 3 0 151
7:20 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 28 0 11 51 0 0 0 63 4 0 165
7:25 AM 0 0 0 0 9 0 21 0 8 40 0 0 0 51 3 0 132
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 13 0 27 0 10 63 0 0 0 58 7 0 178
7:35 AM 0 0 0 0 16 0 20 0 6 46 0 0 0 72 2 0 162
7:40 AM 0 0 0 0 21 0 23 0 5 42 0 0 0 60 4 0 155
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 21 0 35 0 4 36 0 0 0 74 9 0 179
7:50 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 23 0 9 46 0 0 0 68 9 0 166
7:55 AM 0 0 0 0 13 0 21 0 7 33 0 0 0 57 14 0 145 1944
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 28 0 9 41 0 0 0 65 8 0 162 1942
8:05 AM 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 0 11 38 0 0 0 65 8 0 154 1919
8:10 AM 0 0 0 0 10 0 22 0 8 41 0 0 0 53 1 0 135 1884
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 13 0 17 0 8 40 0 0 0 52 8 0 138 1871
8:20 AM 0 0 0 0 21 0 9 0 12 45 0 0 0 45 7 0 139 1845
8:25 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 19 0 6 39 0 0 0 48 5 0 125 1838
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 20 0 17 0 14 29 0 0 0 44 7 0 131 1791
8:35 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 22 0 5 30 0 0 0 36 5 0 109 1738
8:40 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 12 0 3 34 0 0 0 57 10 0 124 1707
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 13 0 18 0 9 44 0 0 0 37 7 0 128 1656
8:50 AM 0 0 0 0 10 0 14 0 8 49 0 0 0 42 5 0 128 1618
8:55 AM 0 0 0 0 8 0 13 0 5 20 0 0 0 47 3 0 96 1569
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 112 0 420 0 212 420 0 0 0 792 88 0 2044 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 4 44 76 0 0 40 4 168
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Westbrook Blvd -- Baseline Rd QC JOB #: 16723534 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Wed, Oct 23 2024
248 345
135 0 113
775 224 121 761
886 0.96 640
1110 0 0 999
0 0 0
0 0
Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:50 PM -- 5:05 PM

1.6 0.9
3 0 0

4.8 0.4 1.7 4.6

2.5 5.2

2.1 0 0 2.2
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Westbrook Blvd
(Northbound)
Westbrook Blvd
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 18 68 0 0 0 45 9 0 153
4:05 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 17 0 15 78 0 0 0 49 9 0 178
4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 15 0 11 67 0 0 0 47 15 0 165
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 11 0 15 83 0 0 0 48 11 0 174
4:20 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 10 0 21 73 0 0 0 43 14 0 168
4:25 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 13 0 12 47 0 0 0 61 6 0 145
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 9 0 12 0 18 80 0 0 0 58 9 0 186
4:35 PM 0 0 0 0 9 0 10 0 20 79 0 0 0 54 9 0 181
4:40 PM 0 0 0 0 8 0 20 0 16 72 0 0 0 57 5 0 178
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 11 0 15 77 0 0 0 49 10 0 166
4:50 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 11 0 13 77 0 0 0 72 6 0 189
4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 11 0 14 91 0 0 0 56 13 0 192 2075
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 9 0 6 0 24 63 0 0 0 49 18 0 169 2091
5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 14 0 9 0 22 69 0 0 0 53 7 0 174 2087
5:10 PM 0 0 0 0 8 0 13 0 19 73 0 0 0 45 7 0 165 2087
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 12 0 11 0 19 79 0 0 0 46 12 0 179 2092
5:20 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 15 76 0 0 0 63 9 0 185 2109
5:25 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 9 0 29 50 0 0 0 38 16 0 155 2119
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 22 63 0 0 0 52 5 0 151 2084
5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 20 0 19 67 0 0 0 48 8 0 168 2071
5:40 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 9 0 26 83 0 0 0 54 25 0 210 2103
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 8 0 19 75 0 0 0 37 8 0 157 2094
5:50 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 0 20 69 0 0 0 46 18 0 165 2070
5:55 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 12 0 22 72 0 0 0 29 14 0 156 2034
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 104 0 112 0 204 924 0 0 0 708 148 0 2200 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 32 4 60
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fiddyment Rd -- Baseline Rd QC JOB #: 16723535 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
1507 1217
344 795 368
700 243 217 735
389 0.92 309
674 42 209 1023
47 757 266
1046 1070
Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM

4.2 8.7

6.1 4.5 1.9

7.4 14.8 9.7 7.2

5.7 8.4

9.5 14.3 2.9 3.7

10.6 6.5 3.4

4.6 5.9
0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fiddyment Rd
(Northbound)
Fiddyment Rd
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 4 33 15 0 10 69 41 0 9 26 4 0 14 29 8 0 262
7:05 AM 2 73 10 0 21 57 32 0 15 16 1 0 12 19 6 0 264
7:10 AM 1 36 15 0 21 57 40 0 23 27 2 0 18 33 17 0 290
7:15 AM 11 65 22 0 29 70 27 0 12 27 2 0 10 22 14 0 311
7:20 AM 1 72 19 0 21 75 28 0 17 29 2 0 21 26 25 0 336
7:25 AM 3 55 18 0 27 62 23 0 30 22 3 0 15 17 14 0 289
7:30 AM 2 63 16 0 29 63 22 0 34 40 4 0 17 22 19 0 331
7:35 AM 4 79 25 0 29 54 35 0 13 43 3 0 13 36 20 0 354
7:40 AM 4 58 30 0 41 70 28 0 14 40 5 0 16 25 13 0 344
7:45 AM 3 62 30 0 42 58 24 0 17 36 4 0 14 32 21 0 343
7:50 AM 5 53 17 0 38 86 31 0 16 49 4 0 17 30 16 0 362
7:55 AM 4 75 21 0 31 78 31 0 35 31 6 0 25 22 17 0 376 3862 8:00 AM 3 44 16 0 38 48 27 0 19 22 4 0 19 31 19 0 290 3890 8:05 AM 3 78 30 0 22 71 42 0 9 23 3 0 12 25 14 0 332 3958 8:10 AM 4 53 22 0 21 60 26 0 27 27 2 0 30 21 25 0 318 3986 8:15 AM 3 37 24 0 22 52 24 0 10 29 4 0 13 21 20 0 259 3934 8:20 AM 8 65 22 0 22 50 25 0 15 34 4 0 24 25 13 0 307 3905 8:25 AM 2 38 18 0 21 52 31 0 24 21 8 0 17 37 29 0 298 3914 8:30 AM 6 66 19 0 34 58 25 0 13 32 4 0 9 26 27 0 319 3902 8:35 AM 4 66 25 0 27 57 23 0 13 21 7 0 17 17 12 0 289 3837 8:40 AM 7 71 21 0 29 45 27 0 22 27 2 0 10 14 21 0 296 3789 8:45 AM 0 50 14 0 30 55 28 1 25 25 6 0 19 22 21 0 296 3742 8:50 AM 6 29 21 0 25 45 26 0 21 32 4 0 9 17 19 0 254 3634 8:55 AM 3 43 7 0 15 32 21 0 18 20 2 0 16 26 17 0 220 3478 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 48 760 272 0 444 888 344 0 272 464 56 0 224 336 216 0 4324 Heavy Trucks 4 32 16 4 28 20 24 16 16 4 16 16 196
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fiddyment Rd -- Baseline Rd QC JOB #: 16723536 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
1462 1546
319 843 300
781 370 360 1099
438 0.95 411
860 52 328 990
51 816 252
1223 1119
Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:10 PM -- 5:25 PM

2.4 1.8

4.7 2 1
4 4.3 0.6 1.8

3.2 3.9

3.8 5.8 0.6 1.7
0 1.2 0

1.8 0.9
0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fiddyment Rd
(Northbound)
Fiddyment Rd
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 4 40 17 0 24 73 26 0 42 28 1 0 20 21 37 0 333
4:05 PM 0 53 21 0 23 42 22 0 31 30 4 0 27 28 34 0 315
4:10 PM 2 54 19 1 22 72 31 0 31 29 2 0 25 39 33 0 360
4:15 PM 5 69 13 0 18 69 28 0 30 33 1 0 24 36 28 0 354
4:20 PM 4 61 26 0 21 80 32 0 41 59 2 0 27 32 29 0 414
4:25 PM 4 52 25 0 23 72 31 0 41 39 7 0 15 23 28 0 360
4:30 PM 6 67 18 0 24 62 25 0 35 51 4 0 26 33 25 0 376
4:35 PM 6 55 20 0 20 72 27 0 22 37 5 0 32 42 31 0 369
4:40 PM 7 87 33 0 16 77 26 0 28 25 4 0 21 26 40 0 390
4:45 PM 2 63 9 0 36 64 17 0 29 35 4 0 29 37 31 0 356
4:50 PM 3 66 21 0 22 64 41 0 31 28 1 0 29 43 24 0 373
4:55 PM 3 64 21 0 29 74 17 0 26 37 3 0 22 42 36 0 374 4374 5:00 PM 4 76 22 0 25 73 17 0 28 37 4 0 34 23 19 0 362 4403 5:05 PM 3 71 24 0 22 66 22 0 38 42 6 0 24 34 24 0 376 4464 5:10 PM 5 62 21 0 23 70 41 0 36 35 3 0 24 27 37 0 384 4488 5:15 PM 4 49 18 0 33 80 37 0 45 40 7 0 19 31 31 0 394 4528 5:20 PM 4 90 30 0 20 72 29 0 23 33 6 0 33 40 34 0 414 4528 5:25 PM 4 66 15 0 30 69 20 0 29 38 5 0 35 33 28 0 372 4540 5:30 PM 6 60 19 0 25 68 23 0 34 41 5 0 23 37 32 0 373 4537 5:35 PM 4 69 20 0 17 62 24 0 37 40 3 0 25 28 31 0 360 4528 5:40 PM 2 36 16 0 20 70 16 0 40 37 6 0 32 45 47 0 367 4505 5:45 PM 8 54 15 0 18 60 34 0 34 29 5 0 25 36 36 0 354 4503 5:50 PM 1 64 12 0 23 67 19 0 30 39 4 0 11 16 31 0 317 4447 5:55 PM 7 48 17 1 30 73 28 0 27 23 7 0 23 31 24 0 339 4412 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 52 804 276 0 304 888 428 0 416 432 64 0 304 392 408 0 4768 Heavy Trucks 0 8 0 4 4 28 16 32 4 0 12 0 108
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Foothills Blvd -- Baseline Rd/Main St QC JOB #: 16723537 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
1161 1254
120 947 94
615 144 116 367
283 0.92 155
987 560 96 445
346 994 68
1609 1408
Peak-Hour: 7:25 AM -- 8:25 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:40 AM -- 7:55 AM

3.3 5.7

3.3 3.5 1.1

5.9 1.4 2.6 2.7

4.2 3.9

3.3 3.4 1 3.1

7.5 6.7 1.5

3.3 6.7
0 2 0
0 0 1 0
2 1
0 1
0 0
5 3 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Foothills Blvd
(Northbound)
Foothills Blvd
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd/Main St
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd/Main St
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 16 44 6 0 4 56 7 0 8 13 39 0 9 5 2 0 209
7:05 AM 18 48 4 0 3 81 5 0 3 11 41 0 7 7 4 0 232
7:10 AM 19 58 5 0 1 67 9 0 13 15 36 0 10 11 2 0 246
7:15 AM 28 41 1 1 7 59 11 1 7 19 47 0 8 10 4 0 244
7:20 AM 18 66 6 0 2 67 8 1 9 25 38 0 6 6 12 0 264
7:25 AM 39 70 10 3 8 74 5 0 4 18 49 0 3 12 5 0 300
7:30 AM 20 62 12 0 7 60 8 0 19 23 53 0 6 9 15 0 294
7:35 AM 24 67 11 0 6 84 3 0 17 30 54 0 5 10 16 0 327
7:40 AM 40 85 7 0 17 64 10 0 11 15 54 0 8 9 15 0 335
7:45 AM 16 92 3 0 3 101 13 0 16 19 56 0 17 16 10 0 362
7:50 AM 33 105 3 0 8 78 17 0 8 33 48 0 6 17 8 0 364
7:55 AM 27 80 4 0 7 92 8 0 9 21 42 0 8 9 9 0 316 3493
8:00 AM 26 66 5 0 7 86 16 0 13 32 40 0 7 18 9 0 325 3609 8:05 AM 32 111 3 1 7 67 3 0 9 22 44 0 5 14 3 0 321 3698 8:10 AM 20 89 2 1 10 92 13 0 18 22 42 0 3 15 10 0 337 3789 8:15 AM 26 75 3 1 6 77 11 0 12 28 34 0 16 17 10 0 316 3861 8:20 AM 37 92 5 0 8 72 13 0 8 20 44 0 12 9 6 0 326 3923 8:25 AM 20 63 4 0 5 74 4 0 15 23 36 0 10 18 9 0 281 3904 8:30 AM 23 72 7 0 10 101 10 2 10 14 42 0 4 7 5 0 307 3917 8:35 AM 21 43 2 1 6 70 4 0 16 24 48 0 4 22 4 0 265 3855 8:40 AM 28 60 2 0 6 56 7 0 15 17 52 0 7 22 6 0 278 3798 8:45 AM 27 54 2 1 4 87 9 1 10 24 47 0 2 8 12 0 288 3724 8:50 AM 27 91 0 0 6 84 9 0 4 24 35 0 6 17 4 0 307 3667
8:55 AM 21 59 5 0 6 54 10 1 17 18 33 0 3 13 7 0 247 3598 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 356 1128 52 0 112 972 160 0 140 268 632 0 124 168 132 0 4244 Heavy Trucks 12 44 0 0 32 8 0 4 16 4 8 4 132
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 4 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Foothills Blvd -- Baseline Rd/Main St QC JOB #: 16723538 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
1645 1396
172 1338 135
1109 161 115 584
232 0.96 339
859 466 130 433
611 1114 72
1947 1797
Peak-Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM

1.7 2.1

1.2 1.9 0.7

1.5 1.9 0.9 1.4

2.2 1.5

1.9 1.7 1.5 1.6

1.6 2.3 1.4

1.8 2.1
5 7 6
3 0 1 0
0 0
1 4
0 0
0 3 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Foothills Blvd
(Northbound)
Foothills Blvd
(Southbound)
Baseline Rd/Main St
(Eastbound)
Baseline Rd/Main St
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 59 83 2 1 14 81 10 1 11 28 43 0 5 31 7 0 376
4:05 PM 47 89 4 2 4 109 10 1 8 10 41 0 9 24 7 0 365
4:10 PM 63 106 7 2 11 94 18 0 12 17 29 0 9 28 4 0 400
4:15 PM 36 100 7 1 9 115 12 0 12 19 40 0 6 29 8 0 394
4:20 PM 52 77 5 0 8 134 12 0 13 18 24 0 7 20 10 0 380
4:25 PM 33 87 10 2 13 85 9 1 18 25 20 0 17 25 11 0 356
4:30 PM 45 82 4 1 15 94 14 1 10 21 37 0 8 29 9 0 370
4:35 PM 48 94 7 0 8 113 13 1 14 16 41 0 12 27 9 0 403
4:40 PM 65 84 1 2 24 79 15 1 15 13 39 0 3 27 10 0 378
4:45 PM 50 119 3 1 4 102 15 0 11 17 36 0 15 20 15 0 408 4:50 PM 47 113 3 1 11 103 11 0 14 23 47 0 12 37 7 0 429 4:55 PM 38 76 6 0 8 125 9 1 13 5 39 0 7 27 8 0 362 4621 5:00 PM 40 112 9 0 10 119 11 2 10 28 36 0 14 20 8 0 419 4664 5:05 PM 46 91 10 0 9 112 5 1 13 12 34 0 8 24 6 0 371 4670 5:10 PM 45 89 4 1 8 119 14 0 19 27 47 0 4 38 11 0 426 4696 5:15 PM 48 88 6 1 14 112 20 1 14 24 43 0 13 30 7 0 421 4723 5:20 PM 56 84 6 1 20 112 14 0 14 21 38 0 13 30 14 0 423 4766 5:25 PM 49 93 11 1 7 131 24 1 13 26 28 0 9 29 6 0 428 4838 5:30 PM 56 77 3 2 12 105 19 0 12 10 43 0 15 28 16 0 398 4866 5:35 PM 55 80 4 1 12 107 15 0 12 17 42 0 7 22 13 0 387 4850 5:40 PM 68 92 7 4 14 91 15 0 16 22 33 0 13 34 4 0 413 4885 5:45 PM 55 82 7 1 17 100 18 1 13 10 27 0 9 29 9 0 378 4855 5:50 PM 45 84 3 3 18 122 21 1 15 18 33 0 10 22 5 0 400 4826 5:55 PM 47 88 4 1 4 64 12 0 18 18 24 0 10 26 9 0 325 4789 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 612 1060 92 12 164 1420 232 8 164 284 436 0 140 356 108 0 5088 Heavy Trucks 8 28 0 0 12 4 8 4 4 4 8 0 80
Buses
Pedestrians 4 12 0 16 32
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hayden Pkwy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723539 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
463 320
68 257 138
412 84 56 386
360 0.86 265
561 117 65 604
67 194 105
440 366
Peak-Hour: 7:20 AM -- 8:20 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:05 AM -- 8:20 AM

2.8 3.1

4.4 1.9 3.6
10 4.8 7.1 10.6

7.5 14

5.5 0 0 5.5

1.5 1 1

1.1 1.1
0 17 1
2 0 102 2
0 0
0 0
19 1
1 2 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Hayden Pkwy
(Northbound)
Hayden Pkwy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 1 3 3 0 11 1 4 0 3 23 2 0 1 30 6 0 88
7:05 AM 1 3 3 0 12 7 4 0 2 18 6 0 1 15 4 0 76
7:10 AM 3 6 4 0 10 7 3 0 4 26 2 2 4 12 6 0 89
7:15 AM 2 10 4 0 18 7 1 0 7 36 2 4 0 16 4 0 111
7:20 AM 2 19 5 0 12 12 4 0 12 42 4 1 3 22 1 0 139
7:25 AM 4 20 5 0 10 4 1 0 9 45 3 2 5 13 4 0 125
7:30 AM 10 27 4 0 9 14 5 0 5 27 0 5 3 16 4 0 129
7:35 AM 6 15 10 0 12 26 13 0 10 41 9 2 1 11 1 0 157
7:40 AM 2 12 8 0 24 29 8 0 6 29 8 1 3 19 2 1 152
7:45 AM 4 7 8 0 8 26 7 0 3 21 6 0 3 28 4 0 125
7:50 AM 0 12 7 0 10 19 6 0 3 32 8 1 10 19 9 0 136
7:55 AM 10 14 10 0 13 19 6 0 5 28 4 0 6 32 8 0 155 1482 8:00 AM 3 19 10 2 10 18 3 0 6 24 9 1 5 24 5 0 139 1533
8:05 AM 8 19 11 0 8 21 5 0 5 30 23 1 8 29 6 0 174 1631
8:10 AM 5 12 14 0 15 44 4 0 3 17 21 0 11 33 8 0 187 1729 8:15 AM 11 18 13 0 7 25 6 0 3 24 22 0 6 19 4 0 158 1776 8:20 AM 4 17 9 0 9 12 5 0 2 29 6 0 3 13 4 0 113 1750
8:25 AM 10 22 10 0 13 5 3 0 3 18 3 0 4 13 4 0 108 1733
8:30 AM 6 21 13 0 10 4 1 0 3 30 0 1 4 24 4 0 121 1725
8:35 AM 2 3 7 0 17 2 2 0 1 36 2 0 1 22 13 1 109 1677
8:40 AM 1 4 9 0 9 6 1 0 0 22 0 0 1 17 8 1 79 1604
8:45 AM 1 4 5 0 12 3 4 0 0 18 1 0 1 15 6 0 70 1549
8:50 AM 2 1 3 0 5 4 2 0 1 32 0 0 0 21 7 0 78 1491
8:55 AM 1 0 1 0 9 1 2 0 0 21 0 0 2 9 9 0 55 1391
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 96 196 152 0 120 360 60 0 44 284 264 4 100 324 72 0 2076 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 8 0 4 4 24 0 0 48 12 100
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 32 4 36
Bicycles 4 4 0 0 144 0 0 0 44 4 0 0 200
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hayden Pkwy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723540 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
248 263
55 95 98
482 44 132 598
304 0.90 395
391 43 71 465
28 91 62
208 181
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM
0 0
0 0 0

0.6 0 0 0.5

0.7 0.8

0.8 2.3 0 0.4
0 0 0

0.5 0
0 6 2
0 0 6 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
1 5 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Hayden Pkwy
(Northbound)
Hayden Pkwy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 2 4 12 0 12 5 8 0 2 32 6 0 4 37 11 0 135
4:05 PM 3 4 3 0 10 2 1 0 3 27 2 0 4 31 14 0 104
4:10 PM 2 6 6 0 4 5 2 0 2 28 3 0 9 27 10 0 104
4:15 PM 4 4 6 0 4 7 1 0 3 14 1 0 7 26 13 1 91
4:20 PM 2 6 7 0 12 4 1 0 4 23 5 0 12 34 14 1 125
4:25 PM 2 5 6 0 9 9 4 0 2 16 2 0 6 26 12 1 100
4:30 PM 1 0 5 0 7 5 6 0 8 21 1 1 8 38 8 0 109
4:35 PM 1 5 4 0 3 0 4 0 4 26 1 0 8 20 8 0 84
4:40 PM 1 5 1 0 11 8 5 0 5 21 3 0 4 45 18 1 128
4:45 PM 3 2 6 0 6 8 4 0 2 27 1 0 6 19 13 0 97
4:50 PM 3 3 6 0 9 3 4 0 3 16 3 0 10 28 5 0 93
4:55 PM 2 3 5 0 9 9 6 0 3 24 1 1 7 19 13 2 104 1274
5:00 PM 0 7 5 0 5 7 3 0 1 31 3 0 4 31 5 0 102 1241
5:05 PM 2 6 4 0 11 6 6 0 6 24 0 0 11 38 8 0 122 1259
5:10 PM 0 9 2 0 7 11 6 0 5 25 2 1 4 26 6 0 104 1259
5:15 PM 1 3 5 0 7 4 9 0 4 35 6 0 7 47 11 0 139 1307
5:20 PM 2 9 5 0 5 14 5 0 0 18 2 0 7 27 13 0 107 1289
5:25 PM 5 2 9 0 12 6 3 0 0 15 4 0 6 20 11 0 93 1282
5:30 PM 0 6 4 0 9 16 3 0 4 37 8 1 5 38 12 0 143 1316
5:35 PM 5 15 7 0 12 11 6 0 5 22 4 1 4 24 10 0 126 1358
5:40 PM 3 10 8 0 11 7 3 0 3 24 4 0 2 36 14 0 125 1355
5:45 PM 4 12 3 0 8 6 2 0 4 27 3 0 9 41 16 0 135 1393
5:50 PM 3 6 4 0 7 4 4 0 4 25 3 0 5 32 10 1 108 1408
5:55 PM 3 6 6 0 4 3 5 0 4 21 4 1 6 35 16 0 114 1418
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 32 124 76 0 128 136 48 0 48 332 64 8 44 392 144 0 1576 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 16 0 16
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 20
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Diamond Creek Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723541 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
422 207
50 84 288
1157 51 131 1173
1464 0.84 996
1656 141 46 1886
95 38 129
263 262
Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM

1.4 1.9
0 3.6 1

3.7 0 1.5 3.8

2.4 4.2

2.2 0.7 0 2.1

1.1 5.3 1.6

1.5 1.9
16 122 0
24 1 66 2
2 0
7 0
45 9
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Diamond Creek Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy
(Northbound)
Diamond Creek Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 3 0 9 1 0 0 0 86 1 0 0 59 6 0 165
7:05 AM 1 0 4 0 19 3 1 0 2 66 1 0 3 53 4 1 158
7:10 AM 2 0 2 0 7 0 1 0 0 101 3 0 2 69 5 0 192
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 0 1 95 4 0 3 52 6 0 181
7:20 AM 1 1 4 0 14 3 3 0 5 153 11 0 2 58 3 0 258
7:25 AM 8 1 3 0 32 4 1 0 2 102 9 0 5 45 5 0 217
7:30 AM 5 2 6 0 20 7 2 0 7 138 15 0 9 69 7 1 288
7:35 AM 4 5 13 0 24 13 1 0 4 106 24 4 5 66 7 2 278
7:40 AM 3 1 8 0 33 16 10 0 4 112 19 4 3 72 5 0 290
7:45 AM 10 2 18 0 24 8 9 1 2 143 13 2 5 106 10 0 353
7:50 AM 15 5 24 0 24 11 6 1 0 135 19 1 5 87 11 2 346
7:55 AM 18 8 26 0 35 15 5 1 0 108 20 3 1 90 10 1 341 3067 8:00 AM 13 10 16 0 27 4 5 0 1 103 16 0 5 75 10 0 285 3187 8:05 AM 19 1 8 0 16 5 2 0 4 174 5 1 3 116 17 0 371 3400 8:10 AM 3 1 4 0 22 4 3 0 3 122 4 1 0 83 13 0 263 3471
8:15 AM 2 1 2 0 23 0 3 0 4 90 3 0 0 57 12 1 198 3488
8:20 AM 0 1 3 0 18 0 3 0 3 135 1 0 1 80 13 1 259 3489
8:25 AM 3 1 1 0 19 1 1 0 3 98 2 0 1 95 16 0 241 3513
8:30 AM 2 0 3 0 14 0 2 0 3 105 2 0 1 78 13 1 224 3449
8:35 AM 1 0 2 0 16 1 3 1 2 134 0 0 1 76 16 0 253 3424
8:40 AM 0 0 3 0 19 1 3 0 2 159 1 0 0 68 7 0 263 3397
8:45 AM 2 1 2 0 17 0 2 0 2 104 0 1 1 87 9 0 228 3272
8:50 AM 0 0 1 0 14 0 2 0 1 128 2 0 1 65 11 0 225 3151
8:55 AM 0 0 3 0 10 2 1 0 3 96 0 0 1 65 8 1 190 3000
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 172 60 272 0 332 136 80 12 8 1544 208 24 44 1132 124 12 4160 Heavy Trucks 0 4 8 8 4 0 0 36 0 0 36 8 104
Buses
Pedestrians 68 48 264 0 380
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 108 0 4 8 136 20 0 0 276
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Diamond Creek Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723542 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
235 292
36 3 196
1880 39 246 2098
1339 0.90 1821
1425 47 31 1573
23 7 28
71 58
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:10 PM -- 5:25 PM

1.3 0.7

2.8 0 1

0.8 0 0.8 0.8
1 0.8
1 0 0 1
0 0 0
0 0
1 6 0
4 1 2 1
0 0
4 1
0 2
1 0 3
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Diamond Creek Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy
(Northbound)
Diamond Creek Blvd/Prairie Woods Wy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 1 4 0 12 0 3 0 5 118 2 0 1 144 9 0 299
4:05 PM 2 0 4 0 12 1 3 0 4 121 5 0 2 147 23 1 325
4:10 PM 4 1 1 0 18 0 9 0 2 130 3 0 2 124 16 0 310
4:15 PM 1 2 0 0 18 0 1 0 3 83 4 0 0 175 17 0 304
4:20 PM 1 1 4 0 8 1 2 0 4 99 1 0 3 132 20 1 277
4:25 PM 2 0 2 0 16 1 6 0 2 91 2 0 1 151 14 0 288
4:30 PM 1 3 0 0 19 1 2 0 4 101 4 1 2 138 24 1 301
4:35 PM 3 1 1 0 14 1 1 0 1 108 2 0 1 126 13 2 274
4:40 PM 1 2 1 0 13 0 2 0 2 96 1 0 1 164 25 0 308
4:45 PM 2 0 1 0 11 0 3 0 0 118 3 0 2 144 24 0 308
4:50 PM 4 1 2 0 10 1 4 0 3 88 4 0 0 153 18 0 288
4:55 PM 2 1 1 0 16 1 2 0 1 73 0 0 0 125 11 1 234 3516
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 14 0 2 0 2 119 2 0 1 185 22 2 352 3569
5:05 PM 1 0 4 0 20 0 1 0 3 88 5 0 0 120 17 0 259 3503
5:10 PM 0 2 2 0 10 0 3 0 2 152 6 0 2 196 20 1 396 3589
5:15 PM 5 0 0 0 22 0 8 0 6 131 7 0 2 136 24 1 342 3627
5:20 PM 3 1 2 0 15 0 5 0 5 89 4 0 0 178 25 0 327 3677
5:25 PM 2 0 4 0 21 0 2 0 6 98 4 0 5 107 16 1 266 3655
5:30 PM 2 0 4 0 17 2 2 0 3 119 4 0 4 163 21 1 342 3696
5:35 PM 6 2 4 0 25 1 2 0 0 104 10 0 1 134 20 0 309 3731 5:40 PM 3 0 3 0 9 0 2 0 5 132 2 0 2 187 25 0 370 3793
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 6 0 3 107 1 0 1 139 13 1 284 3769
5:50 PM 1 1 2 0 10 0 2 0 0 116 1 0 1 154 23 2 313 3794
5:55 PM 0 1 0 0 20 0 1 0 4 84 1 0 2 122 20 1 256 3816
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 32 12 16 0 188 0 64 0 52 1488 68 0 16 2040 276 8 4260 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 20 0 0 8 0 32
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Woodcreek Oaks Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723543 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
475 271
74 151 250
1175 92 73 1093
1513 0.90 815
1812 207 205 2025
268 123 257
557 648
Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM

1.9 6.6

1.4 1.3 2.4

3.6 1.1 15.1 5.1
2 4.7
2 2.4 3.4 2

1.1 4.9 1.6

2.5 2
7 11 1
3 5 4 2
1 0
4 0
2 4
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
(Northbound)
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 17 2 13 0 16 3 3 0 1 89 3 1 7 51 9 0 215
7:05 AM 18 4 11 0 22 2 4 0 3 79 8 0 16 37 5 1 210
7:10 AM 13 2 16 0 13 4 3 0 1 107 3 0 2 58 2 0 224
7:15 AM 13 2 17 0 23 4 3 0 3 89 3 0 13 43 4 0 217
7:20 AM 10 4 10 0 14 8 2 0 8 173 11 0 8 56 10 2 316
7:25 AM 13 16 30 0 35 2 6 0 10 94 17 2 14 41 8 2 290
7:30 AM 11 13 20 0 16 10 2 0 9 125 19 1 16 63 7 0 312
7:35 AM 27 2 25 0 35 7 5 0 8 104 21 1 17 47 7 0 306
7:40 AM 19 10 19 0 21 13 18 0 3 143 24 1 21 62 6 0 360
7:45 AM 32 12 28 0 23 34 6 0 3 119 13 2 11 67 7 0 357
7:50 AM 17 10 21 0 19 18 8 0 5 165 20 5 17 70 4 0 379
7:55 AM 35 19 36 0 32 17 6 0 9 108 29 2 17 69 4 1 384 3570 8:00 AM 24 9 20 0 13 4 8 0 5 128 21 2 11 68 11 0 324 3679 8:05 AM 28 11 22 0 23 20 4 0 8 156 21 1 7 76 5 0 382 3851 8:10 AM 20 8 9 0 14 9 7 0 7 149 12 0 26 78 4 2 345 3972 8:15 AM 14 9 19 0 14 16 3 1 6 87 10 2 16 62 8 1 268 4023 8:20 AM 18 4 19 0 14 3 4 0 6 141 12 1 21 70 5 0 318 4025 8:25 AM 23 16 19 0 25 0 3 0 5 88 5 0 19 83 5 2 293 4028 8:30 AM 15 8 23 0 6 1 2 0 8 125 4 1 14 72 9 2 290 4006
8:35 AM 24 1 25 0 22 3 1 0 4 127 12 2 15 71 6 0 313 4013 8:40 AM 18 4 24 0 11 0 1 0 1 161 6 2 16 66 8 0 318 3971 8:45 AM 21 1 29 0 19 4 2 0 3 116 10 1 8 65 3 2 284 3898 8:50 AM 8 5 19 0 11 3 4 0 3 134 8 0 9 59 4 2 269 3788
8:55 AM 17 6 18 0 17 2 0 0 6 87 3 1 16 53 2 1 229 3633
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 336 164 340 0 296 276 80 0 68 1568 248 36 180 824 60 4 4480 Heavy Trucks 8 0 0 4 4 0 0 28 12 8 36 20 120
Buses
Pedestrians 0 8 12 0 20
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 4 12 0 0 24
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Woodcreek Oaks Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723544 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
298 420
59 79 160
2088 121 209 2224
1214 0.94 1656
1476 141 359 1596
338 124 208
564 670
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:10 PM -- 5:25 PM
1 0.5
0 0 1.9

0.6 0 1 0.6

1.3 0.6

1.4 2.8 0.3 1.3

0.9 0 0.5

0.9 0.6
3 3 0
0 1 5 0
6 1
2 1
1 0
1 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
(Northbound)
Woodcreek Oaks Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 12 10 19 0 12 8 2 0 6 82 9 1 42 166 21 3 393
4:05 PM 33 6 18 0 11 8 4 0 12 123 13 3 29 129 18 0 407
4:10 PM 35 15 16 0 13 6 7 0 6 100 12 6 11 111 16 1 355
4:15 PM 18 12 18 0 5 9 1 0 10 106 14 3 38 167 18 1 420
4:20 PM 29 7 16 0 13 8 5 1 6 84 13 4 31 91 7 0 315
4:25 PM 21 9 12 0 3 9 5 0 7 71 13 2 41 142 16 0 351
4:30 PM 33 2 10 0 19 8 6 0 5 108 10 3 30 118 11 2 365
4:35 PM 14 13 16 0 11 8 2 0 11 96 20 5 26 132 9 0 363
4:40 PM 28 11 16 0 9 8 4 0 6 107 13 3 29 145 23 3 405
4:45 PM 24 6 19 0 14 7 2 0 8 81 8 6 36 143 15 2 371
4:50 PM 25 15 13 0 16 9 3 0 4 91 11 2 19 141 13 1 363
4:55 PM 27 12 16 0 8 6 2 0 10 84 10 4 36 122 10 0 347 4455 5:00 PM 33 7 12 0 12 4 8 0 6 88 13 4 22 141 20 0 370 4432 5:05 PM 21 8 18 0 14 10 2 0 9 83 17 6 40 143 15 0 386 4411 5:10 PM 41 10 19 0 14 8 7 0 12 112 14 2 24 145 17 0 425 4481 5:15 PM 27 12 17 0 12 4 3 0 14 118 13 6 32 123 18 3 402 4463 5:20 PM 35 7 14 0 10 8 8 0 3 119 9 2 22 151 23 0 411 4559 5:25 PM 27 13 18 0 14 8 6 0 9 67 13 4 29 103 19 0 330 4538 5:30 PM 18 6 18 0 20 8 8 1 2 103 11 4 23 166 17 1 406 4579 5:35 PM 20 7 16 0 11 6 4 0 9 134 12 0 38 154 13 1 425 4641 5:40 PM 38 9 20 0 14 9 3 0 4 101 11 1 24 146 14 4 398 4634 5:45 PM 20 11 15 0 15 5 4 0 7 86 8 3 35 108 18 3 338 4601 5:50 PM 31 21 21 0 16 6 4 0 5 114 14 1 22 152 16 2 425 4663 5:55 PM 27 13 20 0 7 3 2 0 6 89 6 2 33 124 19 1 352 4668 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 412 116 200 0 144 80 72 0 116 1396 144 40 312 1676 232 12 4952 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 8 0 24
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 16 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 20
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Walgreens Dwy/Roseville Pkwy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723545 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
84 71
18 15 51
1078 31 33 1256
1915 0.94 1035
2050 104 188 2116
21 11 150
307 182
Peak-Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM
0 0
0 0 0

5.1 0 0 4.8

2.1 5.3

2.1 3.8 2.7 2
0 0 1.3

2.9 1.1
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0
4 1
0 0
0 0 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Walgreens Dwy/Roseville Pkwy
(Northbound)
Walgreens Dwy/Roseville Pkwy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 1 0 10 0 3 0 1 0 0 114 6 0 16 67 2 0 220
7:05 AM 0 0 8 0 1 1 1 0 2 113 9 0 6 65 1 0 207
7:10 AM 2 0 10 0 2 1 3 0 2 121 3 0 10 53 2 0 209
7:15 AM 1 1 14 0 2 0 1 0 2 118 10 2 8 55 0 0 214
7:20 AM 0 0 8 0 4 0 2 0 1 151 8 0 16 72 4 0 266
7:25 AM 1 1 10 0 4 0 2 0 0 180 10 0 9 66 1 0 284
7:30 AM 2 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 140 6 0 7 84 1 0 253
7:35 AM 0 0 17 0 1 0 1 0 2 171 7 0 7 66 0 0 272
7:40 AM 2 0 14 0 4 0 0 0 5 126 9 0 22 96 3 0 281
7:45 AM 1 0 15 0 1 2 2 0 4 209 9 0 15 78 5 0 341
7:50 AM 0 1 14 0 3 2 1 0 2 135 10 1 18 86 0 0 273
7:55 AM 1 1 14 0 2 0 2 0 5 210 11 0 8 84 3 0 341 3161
8:00 AM 2 0 13 0 8 2 1 0 2 116 11 1 13 81 7 0 257 3198
8:05 AM 1 3 11 0 1 0 0 0 2 214 11 1 15 83 3 0 345 3336
8:10 AM 4 0 11 0 4 0 2 0 2 148 7 0 18 95 3 0 294 3421
8:15 AM 2 0 9 0 0 2 3 0 3 124 8 1 14 85 3 0 254 3461
8:20 AM 5 1 13 0 9 2 3 0 2 116 10 0 21 84 3 0 269 3464
8:25 AM 0 0 11 0 8 0 0 0 2 170 5 0 18 96 3 0 313 3493
8:30 AM 2 2 13 0 10 2 0 0 0 113 9 0 18 96 1 0 266 3506
8:35 AM 0 2 14 0 0 2 3 0 2 175 6 0 13 89 1 0 307 3541
8:40 AM 3 1 12 0 5 1 1 0 1 185 7 0 17 78 1 0 312 3572
8:45 AM 0 0 13 0 3 0 1 0 4 145 4 1 14 76 4 0 265 3496
8:50 AM 2 0 15 0 2 0 0 0 1 116 9 0 15 66 0 0 226 3449
8:55 AM 0 0 6 0 2 1 0 0 2 156 5 0 20 84 1 0 277 3385
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 8 8 172 0 24 16 20 0 44 2216 120 4 164 992 32 0 3820 Heavy Trucks 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 36 8 4 68 0 124
Buses
Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4
Bicycles 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Walgreens Dwy/Roseville Pkwy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723546 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
47 69
9 12 26
2127 37 30 2353
1459 0.94 2064
1566 70 259 1615
46 10 130
341 186
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:35 PM -- 5:50 PM
0 0
0 0 0

0.6 0 0 0.6

1.2 0.6

1.1 0 0.4 1.1
0 0 0

0.3 0
1 0 2
0 0 0 0
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 1 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Walgreens Dwy/Roseville Pkwy
(Northbound)
Walgreens Dwy/Roseville Pkwy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 4 0 12 0 4 3 1 0 7 114 6 0 13 160 3 0 327
4:05 PM 3 0 9 0 4 0 1 0 1 139 6 0 38 197 4 0 402
4:10 PM 2 0 14 0 1 2 2 0 3 134 2 0 17 157 4 0 338
4:15 PM 1 0 14 0 2 1 3 0 0 109 1 2 24 192 3 0 352
4:20 PM 7 0 13 0 0 1 1 0 2 107 12 1 21 115 2 1 283
4:25 PM 6 1 8 0 2 0 1 0 0 78 5 0 30 190 2 0 323
4:30 PM 3 1 6 0 4 3 1 0 4 108 6 0 23 137 1 0 297
4:35 PM 3 1 11 0 3 0 2 0 1 110 2 0 24 173 5 0 335
4:40 PM 5 1 5 0 0 1 3 0 4 132 8 0 20 179 2 0 360
4:45 PM 3 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 1 99 5 0 23 197 0 0 337
4:50 PM 1 1 6 0 1 0 3 0 1 93 10 3 20 168 3 0 310
4:55 PM 1 2 10 0 1 1 0 0 3 88 4 0 33 158 0 0 301 3965
5:00 PM 4 0 9 0 3 0 1 0 1 105 7 0 13 189 2 1 335 3973
5:05 PM 5 1 14 0 4 1 1 0 0 106 7 1 32 183 1 0 356 3927
5:10 PM 5 0 11 0 2 2 1 1 1 139 3 0 15 178 3 0 361 3950
5:15 PM 3 3 13 0 3 0 0 0 3 134 5 3 27 153 2 0 349 3947
5:20 PM 4 0 12 0 1 0 1 0 5 128 9 1 15 165 2 0 343 4007
5:25 PM 5 0 7 0 1 2 0 0 3 87 6 1 22 165 4 0 303 3987
5:30 PM 1 0 7 0 2 2 1 0 1 125 4 0 16 195 4 0 358 4048
5:35 PM 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 142 6 1 29 190 1 0 384 4097
5:40 PM 4 2 13 0 4 1 0 0 5 126 7 2 16 156 4 0 340 4077
5:45 PM 7 1 14 0 2 0 1 0 2 123 8 0 21 203 3 0 385 4125
5:50 PM 3 2 10 0 2 3 2 0 4 127 6 0 26 145 2 0 332 4147
5:55 PM 2 0 9 1 1 1 1 0 2 117 2 0 26 142 2 0 306 4152
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 52 16 152 0 24 4 4 0 32 1564 84 12 264 2196 32 0 4436 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 16 0 36
Buses
Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: New Meadow Dr -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723547 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
418 172
42 0 376
1269 33 140 1371
2061 0.90 1226
2094 0 5 2442
0 0 0
0 0
Peak-Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM

0.5 1.2

4.8 0 0

5.1 3 0.7 4.7
2 5.1

2.1 0 0 1.7
0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
New Meadow Dr
(Northbound)
New Meadow Dr
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 24 0 1 0 1 102 0 0 0 64 3 0 195
7:05 AM 0 0 0 0 19 0 4 0 1 146 0 0 0 84 2 0 256
7:10 AM 0 0 0 0 33 0 2 0 0 118 0 0 0 63 5 0 221
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 16 0 3 0 0 147 0 0 0 72 4 0 242
7:20 AM 0 0 0 0 36 0 4 0 0 137 0 0 0 75 6 0 258
7:25 AM 0 0 0 0 34 0 7 0 1 217 0 0 0 79 11 1 350
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 41 0 3 0 2 140 0 0 0 79 7 0 272
7:35 AM 0 0 0 0 27 0 1 0 2 196 0 0 0 84 9 0 319
7:40 AM 0 0 0 0 28 0 6 0 3 145 0 0 0 101 9 0 292
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 44 0 1 0 3 216 0 0 0 109 12 1 386
7:50 AM 0 0 0 0 69 0 3 0 3 145 0 0 0 89 13 0 322
7:55 AM 0 0 0 0 28 0 7 0 3 225 0 1 0 101 8 1 374 3487
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 31 0 2 0 4 128 0 0 0 93 14 0 272 3564
8:05 AM 0 0 0 0 41 0 6 0 2 220 0 0 0 112 7 0 388 3696
8:10 AM 0 0 0 0 46 0 8 0 1 154 0 0 0 81 14 0 304 3779
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 21 0 4 0 0 149 0 0 0 112 15 0 301 3838
8:20 AM 0 0 0 0 23 0 3 0 3 137 0 0 0 112 9 0 287 3867
8:25 AM 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 0 5 177 0 0 0 113 8 0 317 3834
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 23 0 2 0 3 135 0 0 0 107 14 0 284 3846
8:35 AM 0 0 0 0 19 0 2 0 1 185 0 0 0 107 14 0 328 3855
8:40 AM 0 0 0 0 19 0 2 0 4 190 0 0 0 90 12 3 320 3883
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 0 3 174 0 0 0 102 5 0 298 3795
8:50 AM 0 0 0 0 26 0 3 0 0 136 0 0 0 76 12 4 257 3730
8:55 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 165 0 0 0 97 3 0 277 3633
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 564 0 44 0 36 2344 0 4 0 1196 132 8 4328 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 76 0 120
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: New Meadow Dr -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723548 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
206 341
26 0 180
2351 27 319 2653
1595 0.94 2320
1622 0 14 1789
0 0 0
0 0
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:35 PM -- 5:50 PM

0.5 0.6
0 0 0.6

0.6 0 0.6 0.6
1 0.6
1 0 0 1
0 0 0
0 0
1 1 0
0 1 0 0
1 0
2 1
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
New Meadow Dr
(Northbound)
New Meadow Dr
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 18 0 6 0 1 151 0 1 0 185 26 2 390
4:05 PM 0 0 0 0 14 0 4 0 3 140 0 0 0 213 21 0 395
4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 2 0 2 153 0 0 0 195 24 1 394
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 16 0 3 0 2 124 0 0 0 207 13 1 366
4:20 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 3 0 1 111 0 1 0 162 25 2 322
4:25 PM 0 0 0 0 16 0 3 0 5 93 0 0 0 195 26 0 338
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 16 0 4 0 1 92 0 0 0 180 14 1 308
4:35 PM 0 0 0 0 16 0 6 0 0 139 0 1 0 174 17 2 355
4:40 PM 0 0 0 0 15 0 2 0 0 147 0 0 0 200 26 1 391
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 21 0 5 0 1 106 0 0 0 220 17 0 370
4:50 PM 0 0 0 0 14 0 5 0 1 91 0 0 0 188 18 0 317
4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 14 0 2 0 2 92 0 0 0 189 16 0 315 4261
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 15 0 4 0 2 118 0 0 0 188 23 2 352 4223
5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 121 0 0 0 234 19 2 393 4221
5:10 PM 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 143 0 1 0 183 31 1 376 4203
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 27 0 3 0 4 169 0 0 0 188 29 2 422 4259
5:20 PM 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 130 0 0 0 187 27 2 358 4295
5:25 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 1 99 0 2 0 197 33 0 350 4307
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 4 0 1 123 0 0 0 205 20 0 370 4369
5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 1 169 0 1 0 214 27 1 428 4442
5:40 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 2 128 0 0 0 179 28 2 354 4405
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 4 144 0 1 0 226 25 1 413 4448
5:50 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 3 136 0 0 0 166 24 1 345 4476
5:55 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 4 115 0 0 0 153 33 0 320 4481
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 140 0 28 0 28 1764 0 8 0 2476 320 16 4780 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 16 0 44
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Foothill Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723549 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
204 406
24 50 130
1485 82 240 1863
1912 0.93 1299
2196 202 324 2456
162 84 413
575 659
Peak-Hour: 7:40 AM -- 8:40 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM

10.3 3.2
0 6 13.8

4.3 1.2 3.3 3.8

1.9 4.2

1.9 1.5 2.2 3.5

5.6 4.8 7.7

2.3 6.8
0 0 0
0 0 0 1
8 0
2 1
1 1
0 1 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Foothill Blvd
(Northbound)
Foothill Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 11 4 15 0 8 0 0 0 6 88 9 0 9 62 13 0 225
7:05 AM 4 2 7 0 4 2 2 0 5 162 13 0 6 82 15 0 304
7:10 AM 8 8 18 0 10 4 7 0 4 104 6 0 18 48 11 0 246
7:15 AM 2 4 22 0 8 3 2 0 2 163 10 0 13 85 5 1 320
7:20 AM 15 11 25 0 13 7 4 0 5 137 14 0 7 63 17 1 319
7:25 AM 10 6 27 0 2 2 3 0 3 210 20 0 22 94 10 1 410
7:30 AM 8 5 23 0 14 6 3 0 5 161 15 0 19 70 14 0 343
7:35 AM 8 2 39 0 8 2 1 0 3 189 14 0 13 101 11 0 391
7:40 AM 13 7 32 0 13 9 1 0 2 157 16 0 24 95 18 0 387
7:45 AM 12 1 34 0 3 4 0 0 9 183 15 0 31 140 27 0 459
7:50 AM 11 10 46 0 16 3 1 0 5 162 20 0 31 84 23 0 412
7:55 AM 9 6 44 0 12 3 1 0 12 174 24 0 23 112 32 0 452 4268 8:00 AM 17 13 36 0 12 4 5 0 8 156 16 0 22 82 17 0 388 4431 8:05 AM 10 6 41 0 7 3 3 0 2 194 24 0 34 116 19 0 459 4586 8:10 AM 17 11 38 0 12 6 5 0 17 157 16 0 29 82 18 0 408 4748 8:15 AM 13 7 29 0 11 2 0 0 4 175 18 0 25 134 18 0 436 4864 8:20 AM 11 6 28 0 17 6 3 0 4 118 10 0 22 91 8 0 324 4869 8:25 AM 10 4 27 0 7 4 3 0 12 157 19 0 35 136 23 0 437 4896 8:30 AM 25 6 30 0 11 2 0 0 3 129 13 0 21 98 19 1 358 4911 8:35 AM 14 7 28 0 9 4 2 0 4 150 11 0 26 129 18 0 402 4922 8:40 AM 14 2 27 0 19 8 3 0 5 155 16 0 21 84 19 1 374 4909 8:45 AM 13 7 31 0 11 3 7 0 12 185 16 0 25 114 17 2 443 4893 8:50 AM 16 10 23 0 19 8 6 0 7 108 22 0 14 77 27 0 337 4818 8:55 AM 6 7 18 0 14 3 4 0 13 168 15 0 22 91 23 1 385 4751 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 128 68 496 0 124 40 8 0 104 2076 236 0 340 1344 328 0 5292 Heavy Trucks 20 8 28 16 8 0 4 36 4 4 68 8 204
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 8 0 4 0 0 24
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:38 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Foothill Blvd -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723550 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
660 220
90 196 374
2703 66 124 2776
1406 0.94 2312
1750 278 340 2155
289 44 366
807 699
Peak-Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM -- 5:20 PM

1.1 4.1
0 2.6 0.5

0.6 3 2.4 1.3

1.2 0.6

1.4 1.8 5.3 1.2

0.3 9.1 1.6

3.5 1.6
0 0 0
0 0 1 3
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Foothill Blvd
(Northbound)
Foothill Blvd
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 15 4 21 0 28 20 13 0 4 124 12 1 30 187 15 3 477 4:05 PM 34 3 28 0 38 17 11 1 1 146 14 1 19 195 12 0 520 4:10 PM 24 6 24 0 29 29 9 0 3 83 19 1 39 168 13 1 448
4:15 PM 14 8 29 0 18 12 11 0 3 73 37 0 31 197 7 0 440
4:20 PM 16 5 25 0 26 16 6 0 8 67 30 6 37 172 11 0 425
4:25 PM 28 7 31 0 24 15 5 0 5 78 30 3 24 187 11 2 450
4:30 PM 15 2 29 1 17 23 13 0 7 90 27 0 30 132 12 0 398
4:35 PM 18 3 31 0 11 25 12 0 5 78 41 1 28 184 1 0 438
4:40 PM 22 6 31 0 36 22 7 0 5 52 43 2 40 180 7 1 454
4:45 PM 27 0 31 0 33 18 4 0 3 107 38 0 25 212 6 1 505
4:50 PM 15 4 28 0 15 16 6 0 2 90 27 1 31 160 8 0 403
4:55 PM 31 1 14 0 29 10 7 0 5 169 21 1 36 208 9 3 544 5502 5:00 PM 15 5 44 0 32 23 9 0 1 93 15 2 25 168 8 2 442 5467 5:05 PM 33 4 27 0 52 27 8 0 2 115 19 1 22 220 9 1 540 5487 5:10 PM 24 6 33 0 31 26 12 0 4 100 28 1 39 163 9 1 477 5516 5:15 PM 34 2 37 0 27 15 3 0 4 148 26 2 26 210 16 1 551 5627 5:20 PM 21 7 25 0 13 15 6 0 9 140 23 2 22 177 20 0 480 5682 5:25 PM 30 4 30 0 19 3 7 0 6 96 17 0 19 220 11 0 462 5694 5:30 PM 14 4 25 0 31 12 6 0 10 106 14 1 30 187 14 0 454 5750 5:35 PM 27 2 36 2 48 13 12 0 1 130 24 1 23 204 9 0 532 5844 5:40 PM 16 5 36 0 44 18 10 0 5 112 26 2 33 183 5 0 495 5885 5:45 PM 21 0 31 0 16 2 8 0 1 136 9 1 27 223 8 1 484 5864 5:50 PM 11 2 36 1 12 10 3 0 3 102 13 2 20 158 4 0 377 5838 5:55 PM 33 3 33 0 23 11 4 0 1 162 18 0 23 218 7 0 536 5830 Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 364 48 388 0 440 272 92 0 40 1452 292 16 348 2372 136 12 6272 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 16 4 0 32
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:39 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Fidelity Wy -- Blue Oaks Blvd QC JOB #: 16723551 CITY/STATE: Roseville, CA DATE: Thu, Oct 24 2024
1051 0
1051 0 0
2261 0 0 1219
2320 0.95 1210
2597 277 9 2355
0 0 35
286 35
Peak-Hour: 7:35 AM -- 8:35 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:50 AM -- 8:05 AM

5.1 0

5.1 0 0

3.8 0 0 2.7

3.1 2.6

3.2 4 11.1 3.1
0 0 5.7

4.2 5.7
0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
1 0 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Fidelity Wy
(Northbound)
Fidelity Wy
(Southbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Eastbound)
Blue Oaks Blvd
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 70 0 0 114 5 0 0 56 0 0 247
7:05 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 137 8 0 1 65 0 0 270
7:10 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 53 0 0 155 11 0 0 49 0 0 272
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 134 9 0 0 50 0 0 258
7:20 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 79 0 0 185 16 0 0 52 0 0 333
7:25 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 60 0 0 192 16 0 1 80 0 0 352
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 218 16 0 0 62 0 0 377
7:35 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 77 0 0 196 26 0 0 86 0 0 386
7:40 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 106 0 0 200 26 0 0 88 0 0 425
7:45 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 91 0 0 179 18 0 0 111 0 0 404
7:50 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 223 34 0 1 99 0 0 456
7:55 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 84 0 0 193 30 0 1 104 0 0 413 4193
8:00 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 95 0 0 207 26 0 1 90 0 0 423 4369
8:05 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 83 0 0 195 21 0 0 102 0 0 405 4504
8:10 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 84 0 0 216 26 0 1 92 0 0 423 4655
8:15 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 58 0 0 191 27 0 1 117 0 0 398 4795
8:20 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 86 0 0 175 14 0 0 110 0 0 386 4848
8:25 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 90 0 0 167 14 0 0 106 0 0 382 4878
8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 98 0 0 178 15 0 4 105 0 0 401 4902
8:35 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 95 0 0 143 17 0 1 87 0 0 345 4861
8:40 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 85 0 0 191 30 0 0 79 0 0 387 4823
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 85 0 0 191 20 0 0 77 0 0 376 4795
8:50 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 95 0 0 142 13 0 1 82 0 0 336 4675
8:55 AM 0 0 6 0 0 0 61 0 0 182 22 0 0 70 0 0 341 4603
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 20 0 0 0 1112 0 0 2492 360 0 12 1172 0 0 5168 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 64 8 0 40 0 160
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 11/5/2024 3:39 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212