7 JOSEPH CALDWELL, PE, CPESC, CPSWQ,
QSD, QSP, CFM
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Joseph is the Practice Leader with WEBB's Water Resources Department. He leads staff development and oversees the department's quality assurance/quality control program, ensuring all projects meet technical standards from concept through final design. Joseph specializes in master drainage planning, backbone drainage infrastructure, and water quality systems for regional flood control projects. A Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control and Storm Water Quality, he brings expertise in hydrology, hydraulics, and environmental compliance. His experience includes designing regional flood control basins, levees, and miles of backbone drainage infrastructure, as well as hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the San Jacinto River from Railroad Canyon to the existing Army Corps levee in the City of San Jacinto. Joseph's extensive knowledge of local agency design standards and strong professional relationships enable efficient project delivery and approval.
JEFF HART, PE
TECHNICAL ADVISOR AND QA/QC
Jeff is the Deputy Director with WEBB's Water Resources Department, bringing 26 years of public works experience to support the execution of all water resources projects. He is also responsible for assigning project managers to each project and ensuring all project obligations are met with the highest standard. Jeff has previously managed and implemented over $800M of Capital Improvement Projects. He has split his years of experience working with both public and private sector clients, serving as City Engineer, Public Works Director, and Floodplain Manager for the public sector, as well as Director of Engineering and Deputy Director of Water Resources for the private sector. Jeff is well versed, having acted as a representative across various committees, councils, boards, and commissions. Jeff has served as project manager, overseeing and implementing several infrastructure projects, including domestic water, wastewater, recycled water, drainage, transportation, and land development throughout Southern California and Nevada.
ERIC HAYS, PE
PROJECT MANAGER
Eric is a Senior Engineer with WEBB's Water Resources
Department and leads the drainage design team. He brings extensive experience in project management, hydrology,
hydraulics, and drainage design, and a proven ability to deliver innovative and cost-effective solutions across various projects.
Eric has prepared preliminary design reports, alternative analyses, and final design plans and reports for flood control infrastructure and storm drain systems serving residential, commercial, industrial, and public agency clients. Beyond his expertise in drainage design, Eric has a strong background in civil site development and public works projects. He has led the preparation of site grading, street improvement, sewer, bike trail plans, and Water Quality Management Plans and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans. His experience also extends to railroad grade crossing improvements, survey, construction staking, and construction support, giving clients a well-rounded resource who can support projects from planning through delivery.
s r'
RANJIT SINGH, PE
LEAD ENGINEER
Ranjit is a Senior Engineer with WEBB's Water Resources Department. He brings extensive experience in hydrology, hydraulics, drainage design, and Water Quality Management Plans, delivering practical and efficient solutions for various projects. Ranjit has supported clients through preliminary design reports, alternative analysis studies, and final design plans for flood control infrastructure and storm drain systems serving residential, commercial, industrial, and public agency projects. In addition to his expertise in drainage design, Ranjit has a strong background in civil site development and public works projects. He has developed site grading, street improvement, sewer, bike trail plans, Water Quality Management Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans, and railroad grade crossing improvements. Ranjit also brings hands-on field experience, including survey, construction staking, and construction observation, providing clients with comprehensive support from design through project completion.
A L B E R T A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
8 JOSHUA O'ROURKE, EIT, QISP, GIS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Joshua is an Assistant Engineer with WEBB's Water Resources Department. He specializes in stormwater and water resources design and brings strong skills in hydraulic modeling, civil and structural design, and water quality solutions. Joshua is experienced in advanced 2D HEC-RAS modeling, preparation of CLOMRs/LOMRs, and groundwater recharge projects. He also has experience coordinating and using models to satisfy resource agency habitat concerns. He has contributed to designing and preparing construction documents for complex drainage and water resource projects, including storm drain (RCP & RCB), concrete and earthen open channels, and energy dissipation facilities. Joshua also develops engineering calculations, cost estimates, and quantities, and leverages Python programming to streamline. His combination of technical design expertise and innovative problem -solving ensures efficient, high -quality projects delivered on schedule.
j''� Nick is a Deputy Director with WEBB's Traffic and
�I Transportation Department. Nick assists clients with street improvements, traffic signal upgrades, and signing and striping modifications. He also develops temporary traffic control plans for construction while working closely with public agencies, contractors, and construction managers to safely expedite projects, thus minimizing impacts to traffic and businesses. Nick and his team also currently work with multiple public agencies as on -call engineers to help agencies keep projects moving forward. In addition, Nick assists other engineers on street light installations, sewer and water plans, and expert witness testimony. He is also well -versed in the AutoTURN vehicle simulation program which assists in transportation improvements for constrained travel areas such as intersection curb returns and driveways.
AA,
NICHOLAS LOWE, MS, PE, TE
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT
JEFFREY HUTCHINS, PLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT
Jeff is the Manager of WEBB's Landscape Architecture
Department with over 35 years of experience designing resilient, community -focused open spaces across Southern California. A licensed Landscape Architect, he brings a balanced approach that blends creative vision with technical precision to deliver sustainable, maintainable, and impactful projects. Jeff manages projects from concept through construction, overseeing client coordination, environmental review, site analysis, material selection, cost estimating, and QA/QC. He excels in integrating site -specific solutions with long-term functionality, ensuring that design, budget, and constructability align from the outset. His leadership supports seamless collaboration across WEBB's interdisciplinary teams and leverages advanced design tools to achieve cohesive, high -quality outcomes.
STEPHANIE STANDERFER
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT
Stephanie is the Vice President and Director of WEBB's
Environmental Services Department. She has over 25 years of experience as an environmental professional, specializing in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance for public and private clients. Her expertise reflects the dynamic and interdisciplinary nature of CEQA, and she serves as the Principal in Charge of the department, overseeing workload management, project progress, and staff development. Stephanie has worked primarily in Inland Southern California, representing a wide range of clients including transportation agencies, healthcare providers, resource conservation districts, community college districts, local agency formation commissions, infrastructure districts, cities, counties, and private developers. Her diverse project experience enables her to anticipate and navigate challenges that arise during CEQA compliance.
REED CHILTON, PE, QSD
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SUPPORT
Reed is the Director of WEBB's Construction Management and Inspection and Land Survey and Mapping Department and
brings extensive experience delivering complex public and private infrastructure projects from planning through construction completion. He specializes in managing large-scale, multi- discipline projects that require close coordination with public agencies, developers, contractors, and utility providers. Reed oversees construction management, inspection, and survey services for a wide range of infrastructure improvements, including sewer and storm drain systems, domestic and recycled water pipelines, wastewater treatment facilities, dry utilities, street and highway improvements, street lighting, traffic signals, and associated landscaping. His experience spans projects in active roadways, operating facilities, environmentally sensitive areas, and high -profile public corridors where safety, continuity of service, and schedule control are critical.
A L B ER T A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
9 ► 1.5 - Monthly Progress Report and Invoice
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
► 1.1 - Meetings and Coordination
Regular, well -planned, and well -executed meetings
are essential for advancing the project and keeping all stakeholders engaged. This begins with a Project Kick-off meeting and continues throughout the life of the project with Monthly Progress Meetings. WEBB will prepare draft agendas for review at least two working days before
each meeting. Meeting minutes and Action Item Lists
will be distributed within three working days of each
meeting. Based on our proposed project schedule, we
have budgeted for 14 Meetings, including the Kick-off
Meeting and Monthly Coordination Meetings, and three
(3) additional coordination meetings, including preparation and attendance at a City Council Meeting to present the project.
► 1.2 - Project Schedule
A preliminary project schedule is included as part of this proposal. This schedule will be augmented and updated
monthly to track the project's overall progress. This will be compared with the baseline schedule and will identify any potential slippage early. This will help keep the project on track by allowing us to schedule the resources needed to complete it and, if required, develop a schedule recovery plan.
► 1.3 - Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Receiving deliverables that are technically accurate and high quality is a non-negotiable expectation that the City rightfully deserves to have. To ensure that this happens, we have designated an independent QA/QC Team for this
project. This team of Senior Level Associates will review and comment on each milestone deliverable throughout
the project. Jeff Hart, PE, has been designated as the
Quality Assurance Officer and will lead the Independent QA/QC Team throughout this project. No formal submittal or job -related correspondence will be submitted without review and documented signoff by Jeff.
► 1.4 - Shared Documents Folder
To facilitate effective communication and project delivery, a shared folder will be set up using either Microsoft
SharePoint or Teams. WEBB will coordinate with the City to establish the file structure for this folder.
A L B E R T
WEBB
WEBB will submit itemized monthly invoices by the 15th of each month for services rendered in the previous month.
Each invoice will include the percentage complete for each task and subconsultant cost and reimbursable expenses
with supporting documentation.
O Deliverables:
0 Meeting Agendas and Minutes
O Action Item Lists
O Monthly Project Schedules
D QA/QC Plan
O Signed QA/QC Review Sheets
O Shared Document Folder
TASK 2 - DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS
► 2.1 - Project Database
Good information leads to good design; to that end, WEBB will gather, review, and compile a database of relevant information to be used for the analysis and design of the project. Included in this database will be previous studies and improvement plans, hydrological soil information for the watershed, and rainfall data. Information obtained from the project investigations (i.e., right-of-way mapping, utility research, pothole data, and geotechnical investigations) will be included in the database.
► 2.2 - Basis of Design Memorandum
A Basis of Design Memorandum will be prepared to
document the items in the Project Database, along with
analysis and design parameters and decisions, to avoid
misunderstandings regarding the project moving forward.
Our experience working with clients and agencies is that these Memorandums are very helpful, ensuring there
is no loss of continuity when staff rotations or transfers inevitably occur.
O Deliverables:
O Project Database (stored in the Shared Document
Folder)
D Basis of Design Memorandum
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
10 A S S OC I AT E S
TASK 3 - INVESTIGATIONS
► 3.1 - Survey and Control
WEBB will verify the survey control and aerial topography that has already been flown for the project alignment
by RCFC&WCD as part of the downstream Marshall
Creek Channel Project. WEBB will supplement the aerial
topography with field shots of critical design points, such as the inverts of the sewer manholes along the project
alignment. Topography will be obtained in the horizontal and vertical datums and at the resolution required by
RCFC&WCD and the City.
► 3.2 - Right -of -Way Base Map
Base Map RCFC&WCD prepared a right-of-way base map
as part of the downstream Marshall Creek Channel Project.
WEBB will verify this linework. The parcel where the
proposed channel will be located is currently owned by the City. As a result, it is anticipated that the entire project will be located within the existing public right-of-way and the dedicated parcel on the south side of Brookside Avenue.
As such, Preliminary Title Reports will not be required to verify the base map.
► 3.3 - Utility Research and Potholing
• Field Review - WEBB will conduct a field review to
identify further utilities and other project constraints to be considered during design.
• USA Dry and Wet Utility Research - WEBB will
utilize USA service to research and identify known
utilities in the project area. Letters will be sent to
each identified agency requesting backup utility
information. All collected utility information will be
indexed.
• Preliminary Utility Base Map - All utility
information will be plotted on a preliminary utility
base map that will be used to verify the storm drain
alignment.
• Recommended Pothole Exhibit - Based on the
first phase of subsurface investigation, the 30%
alignment will be prepared for each facility. WEBB
will identify all utilities that require precise location.
WEBB will collaborate with the City to develop
this exhibit, which will serve as the basis for the
subsurface investigation.
• Subsurface Investigation - Our subsurface
investigation will consist of field locating utilities by both geophysical identification and potholes, and
the horizontal alignment of all known utilities along
the alignment. Vertical depths from the surface will
also be identified through this process. We have
included a budget for 10 potholes, but we will
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
charge the City for the actual number of potholes
needed for the design of this facility.
• Final Utility Base Map (after Subsurface
Investigation) - The Preliminary Utility Base
Map will be updated based on the subsurface
investigation to determine conflicts and to be
shown on the final design plans.
• Technical Memorandum - A technical
memorandum will be prepared to document and
summarize the utility research and potholing task,
and will include utility conflicts, relocations, and
associated costs.
► 3.4 - Geotechnical Investigation
WEBB has teamed with Geocon, Inc. (Geocon), who will
provide geotechnical services for this project. Geocon
and WEBB have teamed on several RCFC&WCD Projects
(including the downstream Marshall Creek Project) and,
as such, know the geotechnical requirements for an
RCFC&WCD design. Based on our review of the project,
we have budgeted for five (5) borings.
► 3.5 - Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis
WEBB will review and verify the hydrology prepared from previous studies, relying heavily on the approved hydrology for Marshall Creek that we prepared by RCFC&WCD.
As needed, WEBB will augment and refine the existing
RCFC&WCD study to obtain design flow rates for this
project. Calculations will be prepared for both the 100 - Year and 10 -Year storm events. Recommended flow rates
and backup hydrology calculations will be summarized
in a Technical Memorandum included as part of the 30%
Submittal.
D Deliverables:
II Survey Control and Right of Way Analysis
Memorandum
Right -of -Way Base Map and Topographic Surface
Utility Research Letters
Utility Base Map
Recommended Pothole Exhibit
Pothole Report
Utility Research
Potholing Technical Memorandum
Geotechnical Report
H&H Technical Memorandum
000000000
TASK 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
As outlined in the RFP, the Brookside Channel and street improvements were outlined in the Sundance Specific Plan
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
11 A S S OC I AT E S
Environmental Impact Report and its 3 Addenda (SCH
89070309). The implementation of the Brookside Channel
and street improvements outlined in the RFP would
be consistent with the original intent of the Sundance
Specific Plan. As a result, no further CEQA analysis would be required. Based on this, our scope of work will be to provide the City with a No Further Action (NFA) letter to place in its administrative file for the project.
However, the original EIR and subsequent Addenda
did not address MSHCP Consistency for the proposed
project. Since the project will require review and approval by RCFC&WCD, the City, as a Permittee to the MSHCP,
will be required to demonstrate to RCFC&WCD that it has complied with the MSHCP requirements. Therefore, we
have included MSHCP compliance studies in our scope of
work so that when the City submits its plans and applies for encroachment permits from RCFC&WCD, there will be
sufficient information for RCFC&WCD, also an MSHCP
Permittee, to make its own CEQA findings and MSHCP
findings (using the City's NFA Letter).
Based on our current understanding of the Project, WEBB will team with Osprey to conduct the following biological services:
► 4.1 - Biological Resource Assessment and MSHCP
Consistency Analysis Report
Osprey will conduct a comprehensive literature review of the project area and its immediate surroundings to identify any previously documented sensitive biological resources.
This review will include analyses of existing environmental databases (e.g., CNPS, WRMSHCP), agency records
(e.g., CNDDB), and relevant biological studies to establish a baseline understanding of potential constraints at the project site. Following the literature review, Osprey will perform a detailed reconnaissance -level field survey on foot within the project study area, encompassing the
project footprint and a 50 -foot buffer. Survey methods will be tailored to maximize the detection of sensitive habitats and species identified in the literature review.
These may include, but are not limited to, burrowing owls, riverine areas, vernal pools, and sensitive plant species.
Observations will be carefully documented, with attention given to habitat conditions, vegetation communities, and any signs of protected wildlife species. Survey methods will be reconnaissance -level only and are not intended to satisfy protocol -level survey requirements unless explicitly stated under subsequent tasks.
Based on the findings, Osprey will prepare an MSHCP
Consistency Analysis Report. This report will include a comprehensive list of species observed within the project footprint, detailed vegetation and land cover descriptions, and mapped exhibits depicting all identified biological resources. The report will provide a clear assessment
A L B E R T
WEBB
of potential environmental constraints and regulatory
considerations relevant to the project. The report will be prepared in accordance with the WRMSHCP standards.
► 4.2 - WRMSHCP Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment
and Report
The proposed project is located within a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(WRMSHCP)-designated burrowing owl survey area. To
ensure compliance with WRMSHCP guidelines, a qualified
Osprey biologist will conduct a burrowing owl habitat
assessment following the WRMSHCP Burrowing Owl
Survey Instructions (2006). This assessment will involve a systematic pedestrian survey of the project site to identify potential burrowing owl habitat, including natural burrows and suitable man-made structures. If suitable habitat is identified, Osprey will expand the survey to include the project site and a 150 -meter (approximately 500 -foot) buffer around the project boundary in suitable habitat.
The presence of suitable habitat will trigger the need for a focused burrow survey (Task T3) to evaluate potential burrowing owl activity further. If no suitable habitat is found, no additional surveys will be required, and Osprey will prepare a habitat assessment report summarizing the findings, including site photographs, survey methodology, and a project location map.
Optional tasks for Focused Burrow Surveys and Report,
Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and Report, and Narrow
Endemic Plant Species Survey(s) and Report have been
included in Task 7.
TASK 5 - FINAL DESIGN AND CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS
The overall objective of this project is to prepare Plans, Specifications, and Estimates that the City can use to bid and construct the project. It is anticipated that there will be 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% Submittals to allow for review
and collaboration during the project's design.
► 5.1 - 30% Submittal Package
A 30% Plan Set will be developed in accordance with the City and RCFC&WCD Design and Drafting Standards. The
30% design will establish the permanent and temporary
construction easements that are required for this project.
The Channel Plan will show the plan, profile, and sections of the channel along with proposed lateral connections
in plan view. The street plan will show a plan view of the proposed street, including the ADA Ramp at the southeast corner of Brookside Avenue and Cherry Avenue, a new
right -turn pocket from northbound Cherry Avenue to
Eastbound Brookside Avenue, and an eastbound right -
turn pocket to southbound Orchard Heights. Based upon
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
12 A S S OC I AT E S
the channel and road alignment a conceptual trail and
landscape plan will also be prepared. The Hydrology
Technical Memorandum prepared in Task 3 will be included with the 30% submittal.
Engineer's Estimate - Material quantities will be
calculated from the 30% Plan. A preliminary Engineer's
Estimate will be prepared from these initial quantities using RCFC&WCD's Planning Cost Spreadsheets.
30% QA/QC - Before the 30% submittal to the City,
WEBB will conduct a QA/QC review by our designated
Independent Engineering & Drafting QC Taskforce,
which is not involved in the design and production of
the improvement plans. WEBB will submit copies of our
internal review comments to the City as part of the 30% Field Walk - Following the 30% Submittal, WEBB will
coordinate a Field Walk along the alignment with City and Flood Control Staff. Taking time to identify constraining conflicts at this stage is an investment that yields great returns in both time and budget through the remainder of the project. WEBB will incorporate all comments from the Field Walk into future submittals.
O Deliverables
0 30% Channel and Street Plans
0 Conceptual Trail and Landscape Plans
2 Engineer's Estimate
0 30% QA/QC
► 5.2 - 60% Submittal Package
WEBB will address all comments from the 30% submittal.
The 60% Submittal will include pothole information,
profiles of all lateral facilities, and a profile and sections on the street improvement plan. Signing and striping plans will also be prepared with the 60% Submittal.
Draft Hydrology and Hydraulics Report - A draft
Hydrology and Hydraulics Report will be included with the 60% Submittal.
Trail/Public Access Plan - The 60% submittal will include details of the materials, plants, and irrigation equipment required for the public access trail/channel maintenance road.
Quantities and Draft Specifications - Quantities will be calculated based on the 60% Plans. Draft Specifications will be prepared for the project using the City's and
RFCF&WCD's boilerplate specifications.
60% QA/QC - Before the 60% submittal to the City,
WEBB will conduct a QA/QC review by our designated
Independent Engineering & Drafting QC Taskforce,
which is not involved in the design and production of
A L B E R T
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
the improvement plans. WEBB will submit copies of our
internal review comments to the City as part of the 60% Deliverables:
0 60% Channel, Trail, and Street Plans
O Conceptual Trail and Landscape Plans
D Draft Hydrology and Hydraulics Report
O Quantities and Draft Specifications
0 60% QA/QC
► 5.3 - 90% Submittal Package
WEBB will address all comments from the 60% submittal
and prepare a comprehensive 90% submittal package.
Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Report - WEBB will
incorporate any comments from the Draft Hydrology and
Hydraulics Report and prepare a Final Hydrology and
Hydraulics Report for submittal with the 90% Plans.
90% Improvement Plans - WEBB will address plan check
comments from the 60% Review.
90% Cost Estimate - Material quantities will be reviewed and updated from the 90% Plans. An updated Engineer's
Estimate will be prepared from these initial quantities using unit costs from WEBB's Construction Database.
90% Draft SWPPP - WEBB anticipates this will be a Type
1 Project as defined by the Construction General Permit.
A 90% Draft SWPPP will be prepared for the selected
contractor to use in preparing a project bid. The contractor will finalize and implement the SWPPP during construction.
Draft Traffic Control Plans - The temporary traffic control plans will provide traffic control equipment layouts, phased construction work areas, and detour plans to cover the
proposed Project improvements. All efforts will be made to prioritize construction zone safety while maintaining traffic in the area. The temporary traffic control plans will conform to CA MUTCD standards.
Erosion Control Plan - WEBB will prepare an Erosion
Control Plan along with the 90% SWPPP.
90% Specifications - WEBB will prepare 90%
Specifications based on comments from the 60% review
and any additions made during the 90% Submittal
Process.
90% QA/QC - Before the 90% submittal to the City,
WEBB will conduct a QA/QC review from our designated
Independent Engineering and Drafting QC Taskforce
that is not involved in the design and production of the improvement plans. WEBB will submit copies of our
internal review comments to the City as part of the 90% submittal.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
13 D Deliverables:
An optional task for Additional Utility Relocation
Coordination has been included in Task 7.
00000000
Final Hydrology and Hydraulics Report
90% Design Plans
90% Quantities and Estimate
90% Draft SWPPP
Draft Traffic Control Plans
Erosion Control Plan
90% Specifications
90% QA/QC
► 5.4 - 100% Submittal Package
The final submittal will address all plan check comments from the 90% submittal. Included with this submittal will be the final technical specifications, final bid quantities, and final Engineer's Estimate. Mylar plans (or Digital Equivalent) will be delivered to the City and other agencies for final signatures.
O Deliverables:
EI 100% Design Plans
RI 100% Quantities and Estimate
I1 100% Specifications
RI Final Traffic Control Plans
EI Signed Mylars
An optional task for Plat and Legal has been included in Task 7.
TASK 6 - UTILITY RELOCATION COORDINATION
Conflicts with several existing utilities are anticipated due to the proposed roadway and drainage improvements.
These include a 14" water line owned by Beaumont Cherry Valley Water Company (BCVWC), several power poles
and guys with overhead electrical and telecom, and a gas line. Based on the utility conflicts identified in Task 3.3, WEBB and WEBB's dry utility consultant, Utility Specialists SW Inc., will coordinate with the utility owners to relocate their facilities. It is assumed that the utility owners will prepare the relocation design plans. WEBB will review
the relocation drawings to ensure they are consistent
with the proposed improvements. If needed, WEBB will
provide a separate scope and budget for the design of
utility relocation plans. WEBB will also send copies of the proposed street and storm drain plans to the utility owners identified in Task 3.3 at the 60% and 90% submittal stages to confirm that their facilities are plotted correctly on the plans. Because the actual number of utility conflicts and relocations will not be known until the design progresses, an allowance for Additional Utility Relocation Coordination has been included in the optional scope section.
A L B E R T
WEBB
TASK 7 - OPTIONAL TASKS
► 7.1 - Plats and Legal
Plats and legal descriptions may be required for the City to convey all or a portion of the City -owned property to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District as right-of-way for the channel improvements.
The right-of-way requirements and need for plats and
legals will be coordinated with the District as the project progresses. If required, this task includes preparing two legal descriptions and plats and coordination with County Staff for review, approval, and signature for recordation. ► 7.2 - Additional Utility Relocation Coordination
As stated in Task 6, the actual number of utility conflicts and relocations will not be known until the design
progresses. An allowance for additional utility relocation coordination is included in this section, if needed, as determined by WEBB and the City based on the number of
utility conflicts and relocations identified.
► 7.3 - Focused Burrow Surveys and Report (If needed)
If the habitat assessment (Task 4.2) confirms the presence of suitable burrowing owl habitat within the project
site, Osprey will conduct a focused burrow survey in
accordance with WRMSHCP guidelines. This survey will
systematically evaluate the project site and a 150 -meter (approximately 500 -foot) buffer to identify suitable natural burrows and man-made structures that could support
burrowing owls. Pedestrian transects will be spaced no
more than 30 meters (100 feet) apart to ensure complete ground coverage. Transect spacing will be adjusted as
needed based on terrain, vegetation density, and ground visibility. During the survey, Osprey will document the GPS coordinates of all potential burrows, owl sign, and any observed owls. Survey conclusions will be based on site access available at the time of survey; access restrictions outside the project footprint may limit survey coverage and will be documented accordingly. If suitable burrows or burrowing owls are detected, additional focused
burrowing owl surveys will be required in accordance with WRMSHCP protocols (Task 7.4). If no potential burrows
or owls are found, no further surveys will be necessary, and Osprey will prepare a detailed report summarizing the findings, including site photographs, survey methodology, and mapped transect locations.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
14 A S S OC I AT E S
► 7.4 - Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and Report (If
needed)
If suitable burrowing owl burrows are identified during the focused burrow survey (Task 7.3), Osprey will conduct
focused burrowing owl surveys over four separate days,
with the initial survey occurring concurrently with the focused burrow survey. Upon arrival, an Osprey biologist will use binoculars and spotting scopes to scan the site and the adjacent 150 -meter (500 -foot) buffer for owls, burrows, and owl sign, particularly in areas with limited access. Surveyors will then walk the project site and
buffer area in pedestrian transects, spaced no more than 30 meters (100 feet) apart, ensuring complete ground
coverage while adjusting for terrain and vegetation density.
This will be done while minimizing disturbance near any occupied burrows. If access to adjacent areas is restricted, surveys will be conducted from a distance using binoculars and spotting scopes. Upon completion of the surveys,
a final report will be submitted to CASC. The report will detail the survey methodology, transect width, duration, conditions, and results. Additionally, the report will include maps highlighting the locations of identified burrows. If no owls are observed, no further surveys will be required until 30 days before grading, at which point a preconstruction survey will be required.
► 7.5 - Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey(s) and
Report (If needed)
The project is located in a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area for Marvin's onion and Many -stemmed
Dudleya. If the initial habitat assessment outlined in Task
4.1 determines that suitable habitat for these plant species is present within the project site, Osprey will conduct protocol -level surveys for these species, as required
under the MSHCP, during their appropriate flowering
periods. Surveys will be conducted in suitable habitat
areas in accordance with the guidelines of the California Native Plant Society and the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Osprey estimates that up to
three field days with one senior biologist will be needed to complete the surveys. Surveys are seasonally constrained and dependent on appropriate phenological conditions.
If surveys cannot be completed during the applicable
blooming period, they may be deferred to the next suitable survey window.
After completing the field surveys, Osprey will prepare a letter report documenting the survey results. The report will include a detailed site description, survey methodology, and findings, noting any areas occupied by sensitive
plant species and, if applicable, providing an estimate of the affected acreage. If necessary, the report will include mitigation recommendations for potential impacts to
sensitive plant species observed on the project site.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
Assumptions
The following general assumptions are made relative to
this scope and cost:
1. Osprey will provide up to two rounds of revisions
to all reports described in this proposal to address
any comments received. If additional revisions
are required, a separate scope and fee may be
required.
2. Protocol -level surveys, agency coordination,
permitting support, mitigation planning,
construction monitoring, or regulatory approvals are
not included unless explicitly stated in the scope of
services.
3. Focused surveys (Tasks 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5) are
conditional and will only be initiated upon written
authorization from the Client.
4. A MSHCP 30 -Day Preconstruction Survey is not
included in the scope of services. If required, a
separate scope and fee will be required.
5. Surveys requiring specific seasonal timing (e.g.,
narrow endemic plant surveys) are subject to
appropriate phenological conditions. If conditions
are unsuitable, surveys may need to be postponed
to the next appropriate survey window.
6. This proposal assumes that accurate, up-to-date
project plans will be provided before fieldwork.
Significant changes to project design or limits of
disturbance may require revisions to scope and
cost.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
15 Critical Issues and Solutions
Coordination with RCFC&WCD
RCFC&WCD has very particular and unbending standards.
Since they will ultimately accept this project for operation and maintenance, all aspects must meet their standards.
Each step of the process (design, environmental
documentation and permitting, and construction
inspection) must follow a prescribed process.
The WEBB Team assembled for this project has
successfully navigated projects (both City -Sponsored
and Developer -Sponsored) time and time again. Our
team has a combined relationship of over 65 years with
RCFC&WCD. Our proven track record will ensure your
project receives RCFC&WCD approval in the most efficient manner possible.
Especially critical to this project is the inclusion of a shared Public Access Trial/Maintenance Road. Our
experience designing and processing similar projects
through RCFC&WCD will benefit the City. We know the
decision makers at RCFC&WCD and understand the ideal
time to engage them throughout the design process.
We are currently working with the District to design the downstream segment, which will streamline project
coordination and provide us with greater insight into the project.
Traffic Control and Impacts to Local
Residents
The reconstruction of Brookside Avenue will, unfortunately, cause some disruption to traffic and residents. To the
extent that the project can be designed and construction sequenced to minimize disruptions, the fewer complaints City Staff will have to field. The roadway needs to be
configured to direct cross street drainage to the proposed channel. Additionally, continuous access must be provided to the residences along the alignment. WEBB has assigned Nicholas Lowe (Nick), PE, TE, the Deputy Director of our Traffic and Transportation Department, to oversee the
preparation and coordination of the roadway design and
the traffic control plan for this project with the City.
Nick's experience working for both public agencies and
private engineering firms is a significant advantage for this project. Nick's knowledge of procedures and protocols
will ensure this project is constructed in a manner that
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
minimizes impacts on residents. We will initially meet with the City to coordinate design constraints, construction phasing, and accessibility. Because this is so critical, it is essential that traffic control and construction sequencing be developed as part of the plan set, rather than left to the contractor. This will help secure consistent bids from various contractors and avoid misunderstandings about
how construction will be phased, and accessibility will be maintained.
Scope Management and Cost Control
Controlling costs and staying on schedule are critical
components of every project. By managing the scope of
work and budget, it is easier to control the schedule and deliver a project on time and within budget. WEBB will do this through earned value tracking that can be linked to the project schedule.
Using the detailed person -hour estimate and project
schedule, the monthly revenue for each task can be
developed and tracked. This information is critical to
the project, as it helps analyze where specific tasks
are ahead or behind schedule relative to the original
schedule. This system can also be used to project trends that indicate when a particular task is likely to exceed budget. This can be used to determine whether a task's
effort is out of scope, so these issues can be resolved before they become problems. We have budgeted for up
to 15 progress and coordination meetings with the City, RCFC&WCD, and one (1) board meeting.
Deliverables and Design
Approach
Based upon our experience with similar projects, we
anticipate the following plans and sheets to be prepared for this project:
Channel Improvement Plans:
• Cover Sheet (1 sheet)
• Plan and Profile (2-3 sheets Assuming 1 "=50'
District Standard)
• Lateral Connections and Catch Basins (4-6 sheets)
• Details (7-10 sheet)
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
16 Street Improvement/Traffic Control Plans:
• Cover Sheet (1 sheet)
• Plan and Profile (2-11 sheets)
• Details (12-15 sheets)
Erosion Control Plans:
• Cover Sheet (1 sheet)
• Construction BMP Plans (2-3 sheets)
• BMP Details (4-5 sheets)
Design activities will commence with detailed utility
research, aerial topography, and surveyed alignment
bases, complemented by geotechnical analysis. The 30%
design plans will establish the alignment and profile of the storm drain and basin grading, identify potential utility conflicts, and recommend subsurface investigations. As
design progresses, specifications, traffic control plans, and structural details will be developed.
Preparation of Plats and Legals has been included as an optional task in Task 7.
Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
Throughout the project, quality assurance and quality
control will be prioritized. An independent QA/QC team, led by Jeff Hart, PE, will review all milestone deliverables to ensure technical accuracy and high quality. Monthly
progress reports will summarize activities, highlight
upcoming tasks, and address critical issues to maintain project momentum.
Our comprehensive approach ensures the design meets
the County's needs, addresses existing deficiencies, and supports future development within the project area.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Project Schedule
ID
Task Name
Duration
Start
Finish
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3r
Jan Mar May
Jul Sep Nov
Jan Mar May
1 Notice to Proceed/Contract Award 0 days Tue 4/7/26 Tue 4/7/26 4/7
2 3
Project Management 280 days Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
Work Plan, QA/QC Plan, Schedule 9 days Tue 4/7/26 Fri 4/17/26 WEBB
"r,
City,RCFC,WEBB
City,RCFC,WEBB
4 5
Kickoff Meeting 1 wk Mon 4/20/2E Fri 4/24/26
6 Monthly Progress Meetings 14 mons
Additional Coordination Meetings and 14 mons
City Council Meeting (Dates TBD)
Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
City,RCFC,WEBB
7 8
Progress Reports and Schedule Updates 14 mons
Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
W
WEBB
9 10
Data Gathering and Analysis 110 days
Mon 4/27/2(Fri 9/25/26
I
11 Project database (gather, review, 4 wks
compile)
Mon Fri 5/22/26
4/27/26
B
WEBB
ir
+4 7/3
12 Draft Basis of Design Memorandum 2 wks Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/19/26 .,1WEBB 13 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 6/22/2E Fri 7/3/26 14 Submit Draft Memo (w/concept exhibit) 0 days Fri 7/3/26 Fri 7/3/26 15 Final Basis of Design Memorandum 2 wks Mon 7/20/2E Fri 7/31/26 .WEBS
,BB
-N 8/28
019/25
16 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 8/3/26 Fri 8/14/26 17 Submit Final Memo (w/30% plans) 0 days Fri 8/28/26 Fri 8/28/26 18 Agency Approval 0 days Fri 9/25/26 Fri 9/25/26
19 20
Survey and Control and Right of Way Base 190 days
Map
Mon Fri 1/15/27
4/27/26
1 I
21 Aerial and Field Topography and Base 4 wks
Map
Mon Fri 5/22/26
4/27/26
-UlIEBB
B
WEBB
WEBB
22 Right of Way Base Mapping 4 wks Mon 4/27/2E Fri 5/22/26 23 Draft Technical Memorandum 2 wks Mon 5/25/2E Fri 6/5/26 24 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/19/26 Submit Draft Memo (w/30% plans) 0 days Fri 8/28/26 Fri 8/28/26 4 8/28
WEBB
'• WEBB
25 26
Final Technical Memorandum 2 wks Mon 9/28/2E Fri 10/9/26 27 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 10/12/2 Fri 10/23/26 1/15
28 Submit Final Memo (w/60% plans) 0 days Fri 12/18/26 Fri 12/18/26 29 Agency Approval 0 days Fri 1/15/27 Fri 1/15/27
30 31
Utility Research and Potholing 240 days Mon 4/27/2(Fri 3/26/27 32 Utility Research 4 wks Mon 4/27/2E Fri 5/22/26
- +mi,-WEBB
�l
_
EBB
WEBB
Underground
Solutions
33 Field Review/Site Visit 1 wk Mon 5/25/2E Fri 5/29/26 34 Preliminary Utility Base Map 1 wk Mon 6/1/26 Fri 6/5/26 35 Pothole Exhibit 1 wk Mon 8/17/2E Fri 8/21/26
36 Subsurface Investigation - potholing 4 wks Mon 9/28/2E Fri 10/23/26
4.,.,, WEBB
WEBB
WEBB
*, 12/18
,_,,WEBB
WEBB
H 2/26
o13/26
37 Final Utility Base Map 2 wks Mon 10/26/2 Fri 11/6/26 Draft Technical Memorandum 1 wk Mon 11/30/2 Fri 12/4/26 38 39
QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 12/7/2E Fri 12/18/26 40 Submit Draft Memo (with 60% plans) 0 days Fri 12/18/26 Fri 12/18/26 41 Final Technical Memorandum 2 wks Mon 2/1/27 Fri 2/12/27 42 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 2/15/27 Fri 2/26/27 43 Submit Final Memo (w/90% plans) 0 days Fri 2/26/27 Fri 2/26/27 44 Agency Approval 0 days Fri 3/26/27 Fri 3/26/27
45 46
Geotechnical Investigation 40 days Mon 4/27/2E Fri 6/19/26
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S O C I AT E S
ID
Task Name
Duration
Start
Finish
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
Jan Mar J May,
Jul
Se')
Nov
Jan Mar May
Jul
47 Geotechnical Investigation and Report 8 wks Mon 4/2712E Fri 6/19/26
Ili
48 49
Environmental Services 240 days Mon 8/3/26
Fri 7/2/27
I
_iwfii
WEBB
_f
50 CEQA NFA Letter 2 wks Mon 8/3/26
Fri 8/14/26
51 MSHCP Consistancy Report 3 mons Mon 8/3/26
BUOW Report 3 mons Mon 8/3/26
Fri 10/23/26
4. a,___
Fri 10/23/26
52 53
Optional Focused BUOW Burrowing and
Species Surveys
5 mons
Mon
2/15/27
Fri 7/2/27
54 Optional - NEPSSA
5 mons
Mon 2/15/27
Fri 7/2/27
Glty,RCFC
.�
v
55 56
30% Submittal
Hydrology Analysis and Technical Memo
80 days
4 wks
Mon 6/8/26
Mon 6/8/26
Fri 9/25/26
Fri 7/3/26
iiimmini
-
57 WEBB
WEBS
..--. 7/3
C
City,RCFC
c
{WE
48/28
BB
WEBB
58 Street and Storm Drain Concept Exhibits
4 wks
Mon 6/8/26
Fri 7/3/26
Fri 7/3/26
Fri 7/17/26
59 Submit Concept Exhibits
Concept Exhibits - Agency
Review/Approval
0 days
2 wks
Fri 7/3/26
Mon 7/6/26
60 61
30% Storm Drain Plan and Cost Estimate
30% QA/QC and Address QA/QC
comments
4 wks
2 wks
Mon 7/20/2E
Mon
8/17/26
Fri 8/14/26
Fri 8/28/26
62 Fri 8/28/26
63 30% Submittal
0 days
Fri 8/28/26
64 Agency Review
4 wks
Mon 8/31/2€
Fri 9/25/26
Tswi..all
65 66
60% Submittal
60 days
Mon 10/26/1
Fri 1/15/27
i
67 Final H&H anaylsis and Draft Drainage
Report
6 wks
Mon
10/26/26
Fri 12/4/26
WEBB
..,....
68 60% Plans, Cost Estimate, and Draft
Specifications
6 wks
Mon
10/26/26
Fri 12/4/26
WEBB
Tiit7rWEBB
--.12/18
yam,-City,RCFC
60% QA/QA and Address QA/QC
Comments
60% Submittal
2 wks
0 days
Mon
12/7/26
Fri 12/18/26
Fri 12/18/26
Fri 12/18/26
69 70
71 Agency Review
4 wks
Mon 12/21/2
Fri 1/15/27
72 73
90% Submittal
50 days
Mon 1/18/21
Fri 3/26/27
I
I
-WEBB
WEBB
74 Final Drainage Report
4 wks
Mon 1/18/27
Fri 2/12/27
Fri 2/12/27
75 90% Plans, Estimate, Specifications, and
strucural calculations
4 wks
Mon
1/18/27
,,w-
WEBB
._
4-/26
WEBB
_ _..„_City,RCFC
76 Draft SWPPP and Erosion Control Plans
90% QA/QA and Address QA/QC
Comments
4 wks
2 wks
Mon 1/18/27
Mon
2/15/27
Fri 2/12/27
77 Fri 2/26/27
Fri 2/26/27
Fri 3/26/27
78 90% Submittal
Agency Review
0 days
4 wks
Fri 2/26/27
Mon 3/1/27
79 80
81 100% Submittal
60 days
Mon 3/29/21
Fri 6/18/27
I
' -WEBB
m_
WEBB
L-WEBB
i
4/23
82 Final Signed Drainage report, plans,
special provisions, and estimate
2 wks
Mon
3/29/27
Fri 4/9/27
Fri 4/9/27
Fri 4/23/27
83 Final Draft SWPPP & Erosion Control Plan
Final QA/QC and Address QA/QC
comments
2 wks
2 wks
Mon 3/29/27
Mon
4/12/27
84 Fri 4/23/27
85 Final Submittal 0 days Fri 4/23/27
86 Agency Signatures/Approval 8 wks Mon 4/26/27
Fri 6/18/27
1.....". City,RCFC
89 Utility Relocation Coordination 10 mons Mon 9/28/2E
Fri 7/2/27
WEBB,City
N
2/18
.4-2/26
90 60% Utility Notice 0 days Fri 12/18/26
90% Utility Notice 0 days Fri 2/26/27
Fri 12/18/26
Fri 2/26/27
91 A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ASSOCIATES
WEBB has provided comprehensive information throughout this proposal regarding our qualifications, approach, and understanding of the Brookside Street Improvements project. Optional services, including Plats and Legal Descriptions, Additional Utility Relocation Coordination, and conditional biological surveys, have been detailed in Task 7 of our Scope of Services and are available for separate authorization as project needs are identified.
We believe the preceding sections of this proposal fully demonstrate our technical capabilities, project understanding, strategic advantages through our Marshall Creek design leadership, and commitment to delivering quality results for the City of Beaumont. We have no additional information to provide at this time that has not already been addressed in the Cover Letter, Project Understanding, Scope of Services, Team Qualifications, or Critical Issues and Solutions sections of this proposal.
WEBB looks forward to the opportunity to discuss any aspects of our proposal in greater detail during the interview process, should the City request clarification or additional information on any element of our approach to this important infrastructure project.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
20 MARSHALL CREEK, STAGE 1
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Protecting homes along Brookside Avenue from recurring stormwater flooding required a design that could manage large flows while minimizing disruption to the surrounding neighborhood. For the Marshall Creek, Stage 1 project, WEBB prepared final design and PS&E documents for a new storm drain system that captures and conveys approximately 1,900 cfs of runoff to the existing Marshall Creek channel.
The work supports the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in reducing flood risk, improving drainage reliability, and preparing infrastructure for future upstream improvements.
WEBB addressed several complex challenges through detailed analysis and coordination. Two-dimensional hydraulic modeling was used to design a downstream outlet that dissipates energy and aligns with existing channel conditions, thereby reducing erosion risk and environmental impacts. Tight right-of-way constraints along the Shane Lane corridor required alignment optimization and evaluation of precast reinforced concrete box sections to maintain constructability. Traffic control planning and sequencing preserved residential access during construction. WEBB also coordinated utilities, land acquisition exhibits, environmental documentation, and final bid -ready plans, providing a comprehensive solution that balances hydraulic performance, community needs, and long-term system resilience.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
Project Highlights
Reference:
Michael Venable, PE
Engineering Manager
1995 Market Street, Riverside, CA
92501
[email protected]
951.955.1248
Duration:
2025 - Present
WEBB Contract:
$599,100
Construction Cost:
$8 M
Project Team:
Scott Hildebrandt, PE
Joseph Caldwell, PE, CPESC,
CPSWQ, QSD, QSP, CFM
Eric Hays, PE
Ranjit Singh, PE
Joshua O'Rourke, EIT, QISP, GIS
Jaimee Bourgeois, MS, PE, TE
Son Le
Reed Chilton, PE, QSD
Haley Franco
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
21 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT
NORTH INDIO CHANNEL
PHASE 1 AND 2
DURATION
2013 - 2025
Protecting a growing desert
community from regional flooding
required a solution that balanced
capacity, constructability, and
neighborhood impacts. The North
Indio Regional Flood Control Project
delivers a 3.3 -mile stormwater
conveyance system that strengthens
flood protection for the City of
Indio and unincorporated Riverside
County while supporting long-term
watershed management goals.
Working in close coordination
with CVWD, WEBB served as lead
engineering consultant from planning
through construction, providing
alignment studies, cost evaluations,
construction documents, utility
coordination, and right-of-way
acquisition. Key challenges included
integrating the system into existing
infrastructure and minimizing
impacts to residents, addressed
through optimized alignments,
strategic land acquisition, and value
engineering that maintained high
safety and performance standards
while controlling costs.
CLIENT CONTACT
David Wilson, PE
Engineering Manager
[email protected]
760.398.2661 Ext. 2736
51501 Tyler Street, Coachella, CA 92236
A L B E R T A.
WEBB
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WOODCREST RINEHART
DRAINAGE PLAN
DURATION
2021 - 2025
WEBB conducted a comprehensive
discharge analysis using 2D RAS
modeling to assess environmental
impacts, leading to the development
of 30%, 60%, and 90% Design
Plans that comply with District
standards and incorporate
essential feedback. Our team
diligently documented the design
parameters with a Memorandum
of Understanding, ensuring
clarity and consensus on project
objectives. Critical tasks included
land acquisition coordination, GIS
mapping for CEQA and permitting,
and detailed utility coordination,
which were integral to our planning
and execution phases. We finalized
the project with a robust Hydrology
and Hydraulics Report, complete
bid items, cost estimates, and
a 90% Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan, ensuring all digital
and physical documentation was
signed, stamped, and ready for
implementation.
CLIENT CONTACT
Michael Venable
Engineering Manager
[email protected]
951.955.1248
1995 Market Street, Riverside, CA 92501
CITY OF INDIO
THE CIVIC CENTER STORM
DRAIN (SD2201) AND OASIS
STREET BEAUTIFICATION
(ST2303) PROJECTS
DURATION
2022 - 2025
Reducing chronic neighborhood
flooding and improving street
safety drove this comprehensive
drainage and streetscape effort for
the City of Indio. WEBB prepared
the City's Master Drainage Plan to
pinpoint recurring problem areas
and translate long-standing needs
into an implementable capital
project. In collaboration with the
City, WEBB supported a successful
State of California Urban Flood
Protection Grant application and
advanced the project through
final Plans, Specifications, and
Estimates. Improvements include
new storm drains, drainage swales,
curb extensions, curb ramps,
rain gardens, street lighting, and
multimodal enhancements across
multiple corridors. When the project
scope expanded late in design,
WEBB mobilized additional in-house
resources to maintain momentum
and deliver bid -ready documents
that balanced flood protection,
water quality, and community
improvements.
CLIENT CONTACT
Tim Wassil, PE, PMP, CCM
Public Works Director
[email protected]
760.391.4018
100 Civic Center Mall, Indio, CA 92201
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
22 A S S OC I AT E S
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
PERRIS VALLEY CHANNEL
LATERAL B, STAGE 4
DURATION
2021 - 2018
Adapting legacy drainage
infrastructure to support modern
development was essential to
protecting critical facilities and
enabling growth in the City of Perris.
As part of the evolving Perris Valley
Master Drainage Plan, WEBB led
the evaluation and realignment of
Lateral B, a key regional facility
affected by development constraints
and operations at March Air Reserve
Base. Working closely with the
March Joint Powers Authority and
Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District,
WEBB identified an optimized
alignment east of I-215 to improve
constructability and long-term
integration. The completed
downstream segment and ongoing
Stage 4 design and bidding support
will strengthen flood protection,
enhance regional capacity, support
future development, and safeguard
vital infrastructure.
CLIENT CONTACT
Entcho Anguelov
Engineering Project Manager
[email protected]
951.955.1234
1995 Market Street, Riverside, CA 92501
A L B E R T
WEBB
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BEDFORD WASH CHANNEL
DURATION
2018 - 2020
Balancing flood protection with
environmental stewardship guided
the extension of the Bedford Wash
Channel from the I-15 freeway to
Bedford Canyon. WEBB advanced
the project from preliminary
planning through 30 percent design,
studies, agency approvals, and
coordination to support permitting
and final construction drawings.
Early concepts relied on a fully
concrete -lined channel, but WEBB
guided stakeholders toward a
soft -bottom alternative that better
preserved natural habitat while
maintaining hydraulic performance.
A major challenge was managing
high -velocity 100 -year storm
flows that threatened downstream
infrastructure. WEBB addressed
this risk by designing a debris basin
to capture heavy material while
allowing finer sediment to pass,
delivering a resilient, environmentally
responsive flood control solution.
CLIENT CONTACT
Edwin Quinonez
Assistant Chief Engineer
[email protected]
951.955.1452
1995 Market Street, Riverside, CA 92501
MARCH JOINT POWERS
AUTHORITY
HEACOCK CHANNEL
DURATION
2013 - 2024
Transforming an undersized earthen
channel into a resilient regional
facility, this project advances critical
flood protection along approximately
10,000 linear feet from Lateral A of
the Perris Valley Storm Drain north to
Cactus Avenue. Final improvement
plans, traffic control plans, and
a comprehensive hydrology and
hydraulics report were prepared
to support long-term capacity and
operational reliability. The effort
required close coordination across
multiple jurisdictions, including
March Air Reserve Base, the
March Joint Powers Authority as
the lead agency, and the Riverside
County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District as the
future operator. Environmental
documentation addressed
groundwater contamination, a
capped landfill, biological resources,
hazardous materials, and water
quality to secure approvals and
position the project for successful
implementation.
CLIENT CONTACT
Danielle Wheeler
Executive Director
[email protected]
951.656.700
14205 Meridian Parkway, Riverside, CA,
92518
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
23 A S S OC I AT E S
I. RESUMES
JOSEPH CALDWELL, PE, CPESC, CPSWQ, QSD, QSP, CFM
PRACTICE AREA LEADER I WATER RESOURCES
Joseph Caldwell, PE, CPESC, CPSWQ, QSD, QSP, CFM, is the Practice Leader with WEBB's Water Resources Department. He leads staff development and oversees the department's quality assurance/quality control program, ensuring all projects meet technical standards from concept through final design.
Joseph specializes in master drainage planning, backbone drainage infrastructure, and water quality systems for regional flood control projects. A Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control and Storm Water Quality, he brings expertise in hydrology, hydraulics, and environmental compliance.
His experience includes designing regional flood control basins, levees, and miles of backbone drainage infrastructure, as well as hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the San Jacinto River from Railroad Canyon to the existing Army Corps levee in the City of San Jacinto. Joseph's extensive knowledge of local agency design standards and strong professional relationships enable efficient project delivery and approval.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Arts and Music Line, Coachella Valley Association of Governments • North Indio Channel Phase 1 and 2, Coachella Valley Water District • Woodcrest Rinehart Drainage Plan, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• Water Master Plan, City of Imperial
• Perris Valley Channel Lateral B, Stage 4, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• Sunnymead MDP LINE B -16A, Stage 2, City of Moreno Valley Public Works • Heacock Channel March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• Lateral C-1 Stormdrain, City of Wildomar
• San Jacinto River Stage 3 Master Plan, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• 2022 Wastewater Master Plan, Rubidoux Community Services District • Sewer Master Plan, Jurupa Community Services District • Master Water Plan, Jurupa Community Services District •
Hemet MDP Line C, Stage 4, Riverside County Flood Control and Water EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 24 Years
WEBB: 24 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Civil Engineer C 67239 CA
Civil Engineer 030017 NV
Civil Engineer C 76114 AZ
Civil Engineer 14217483 UT
Civil Engineer 0066347 CO
CERTIFICATIONS:
Certified Professional in Erosion and
Sediment Control CPESC 5311
Certified Professional in Stormwater
Quality CPSWQ 544
Qualified SWPPP Developer QSD
00076
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner QSP
00076
Certified Floodplain Manager CFM
EDUCATION:
BS, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University
MS, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Public Works Association
Floodplain Management Association
Conservation District
• MDP and Line C-1 Storm Drain, City of Desert Hot Springs • The Civic Center Storm Drain (SD2201) and Oasis Street Beautification (ST2303) Projects, City of Indio • Wildwood Creek Basin, City of Yucaipa
• Beaumont Recharge Facility, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency • Perris Valley Commerce Center Specific Plan and EIR, City of Perris • Eastern Coachella Valley Stormwater Master Plan and EIR, Coachella Valley Water District • Bedford Wash Channel, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Homeland/Romoland Master Drainage Plan and EIR, Riverside County Flood Control District & Water Conservation District
• University Wash Storm Drain Project, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Palm Springs MDP Line 43, Lateral 43-A, and Lateral B-03, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• Perris Valley Storm Drain Project & Trail Project, City of Perris
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
24 JEFF HART, PE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, WATER RESOURCES I WATER RESOURCES
Jeff Hart is the Deputy Director with WEBB's Water Resources Department, bringing 26 years of public works experience to support the execution of all water resources projects. He is also responsible for assigning project managers to each project and ensuring all project obligations are met with the highest standard. Jeff has previously managed and implemented over $800M of Capital Improvement Projects.
He has split his years of experience working with both public and private sector clients, serving as City Engineer, Public Works Director, and Floodplain Manager for the public sector, as well as Director of Engineering and Deputy Director of Water Resources for the private sector. Jeff is well versed, having acted as a representative across various committees, councils, boards, and commissions.
Jeff has served as project manager, overseeing and implementing several infrastructure projects, including domestic water, wastewater, recycled water, drainage, transportation, and land development throughout Southern California and Nevada.
As a Principal Engineer for the Coachella Valley Water District, he oversaw the initial Chromium -6 compliance study, which was ultimately heading to the largest public works construction project ever in the Coachella Valley ($400M) before a judgment invalidating the new MCL in 2017. Recent water resource projects include the implementation of a $100M wastewater treatment plant upgrade for the City of Beaumont, including the ability to produce recycled water via RO and the construction EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 26 Years
WEBB: 3 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Civil Engineer C 70910 CA
Civil Engineer C 19069 NV
CERTIFICATIONS:
Qualified SWPPP Developer
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner
EDUCATION:
BS, General Civil Engineering
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
of a 22 -mile brine line.
Along with experience in regional infrastructure projects, Jeff has extensive knowledge and experience with planning, entitlement, development (residential, commercial, and industrial), capital improvement development, and budgeting.
His extensive experience translates to an understanding of all the steps required to successfully complete a project efficiently and on schedule.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Talavera Phase 2 Water Main Replacements, Coachella Valley Water District • Highway 86 Water Transmission Main, Phase 3 and 4, Coachella Valley Water District • Perris 4th and 7th Street Lift Stations, Eastern Municipal Water District • Mesa Lift Station and 16" Force Main Project, City of Beaumont • Water and Sewer Evaluation, Highland Fairview
• PLC Upgrade Project, 9 Lift Stations, City of Beaumont • Backbone Feasibility Study, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency • Avenue 60 Directional Drill Water Main, Coachella Valley Water District • Waste Water Treatment Plant Expansion, City of Beaumont • Brine Line Extension, City of Beaumont
• Fire Station 66 Water Improvements, City of Beaumont
• West of Devers Transmission Line Project, City of Beaumont/Edison • Tequesquite Arroyo Trunk Sewer, City of Riverside
• Sunbird Mobile Home Domestic Water Project, Coachella Valley Water District • Airport Blvd. Hwy 111 Bridge Water Main, Coachella Valley Water District • Torres Martinez Tribal Water Improvements, Coachella Valley Water District • Wastewater Master Plan, City of Fontana
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
25 ERIC HAYS, PE
SENIOR ENGINEER I WATER RESOURCES
Eric Hays, PE, is a Senior Engineer with WEBB's Water Resources Department and leads the drainage design team. He brings extensive experience in project management, hydrology, hydraulics, and drainage design, and a proven ability to deliver innovative and cost-effective solutions across various projects. Eric has prepared preliminary design reports, alternative analyses, and final design plans and reports for flood control infrastructure and storm drain systems serving residential, commercial, industrial, and public agency clients.
Beyond his expertise in drainage design, Eric has a strong background in civil site development and public works projects. He has led the preparation of site grading, street improvement, sewer, bike trail plans, and Water Quality Management Plans and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans. His experience also extends to railroad grade crossing improvements, survey, construction staking, and construction support, giving clients a well-rounded resource who can support projects from planning through delivery.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 25 Years
WEBB: 14 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Civil Engineer C 73614 CA
EDUCATION:
BS, Civil Engineering
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Civil Engineers
• North Indio Channel Phase 1 and 2, Coachella Valley Water District • Woodcrest Rinehart Drainage Plan, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Beaumont Recharge Facility - San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency • Line E Drainage Plan, City of San Jacinto
• University Wash Storm Drain Project, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • North Indio Regional Flood Control Channel, Coachella Valley Water District • Master Drainage Plan Update, City of Lake Elsinore Public Works • Third St Grade Separation, City of Riverside
• Wilson Basin, City of Yucaipa
• San Jacinto Master Drainage Plan, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Etiwanda Storm Drain, Goodman
• BMP Retrofit Master Plan, City of Eastvale
• Paradise Knolls Slope Protection, Strategic Land Partners • Thousand Palms Channel Preliminary Design Report, Coachella Valley Water District • Belle Terre Backbone Storm Drain, Regent Properties
• San Jacinto Valley MDP Line E Preliminary Design Report, San Jacinto Master Developer, LLC
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
26 RANJIT SINGH, PE
SENIOR ENGINEER I WATER RESOURCES
Ranjit Singh, PE, is a Senior Engineer with WEBB's Water Resources Department.
He brings extensive experience in hydrology, hydraulics, drainage design, and Water Quality Management Plans, delivering practical and efficient solutions for various projects. Ranjit has supported clients through preliminary design reports, alternative analysis studies, and final design plans for flood control infrastructure and storm drain systems serving residential, commercial, industrial, and public agency projects.
In addition to his expertise in drainage design, Ranjit has a strong background in civil site development and public works projects. He has developed site grading, street improvement, sewer, bike trail plans, Water Quality Management Plans, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans, and railroad grade crossing improvements. Ranjit also brings hands-on field experience, including survey, construction staking, and construction observation, providing clients with comprehensive support from design through project completion.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Woodcrest Rinehart Drainage Plan, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• Sunnymead MDP LINE B -16A, Stage 2, City of Moreno Valley Public Works • Heacock Channel March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension, City of Banning
MDP and Line C-1 Storm Drain, City of Desert Hot Springs •
•
• The Civic Center Storm Drain (SD2201) and Oasis Street Beautification (ST2303) Projects, City of Indio
• Speedway Commerce Center II Backbones, Hillwood Investment Properties • Heacock Channel Design Phase 3, March Joint Powers Authority • Bedford Wash Engineering Services, The New Home Company • Perris Valley Channel Lateral B, Stage 5, Hillwood Investment Properties • Thousand Palms Master Drainage Plan, The Berger Foundation • Cherry Valley Boulevard Storm Drain, Stage 1, Shopoff Realty Investments • San Jacinto Valley MDP Line E Preliminary Design Report, San Jacinto Master Developer, LLC EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 23 Years
WEBB: 13 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Civil Engineer C 68716 CA
EDUCATION:
MS, Civil Engineering
University of Toledo
BS, Civil Engineering
Sardar Patel College of Engineering,
Mumbai India
AS, Civil Engineering
K.J. Somaiya Polytechnic, Mumbai,
India
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Civil Engineers
Air & Waste Management
Association
American Water Works Association
Water Environment Federation
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
27 JOSHUA O'ROURKE, EIT, QISP, GIS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER I WATER RESOURCE.
Joshua O'Rourke, EIT, is an Assistant Engineer with WEBB's Water Resources Department. He specializes in stormwater and water resources design and brings strong skills in hydraulic modeling, civil and structural design, and water quality solutions. Joshua is experienced in advanced 2D HEC-RAS modeling, preparation of CLOMRs/LOMRs, and groundwater recharge projects. He also has experience coordinating and using models to satisfy resource agency habitat concerns.
He has contributed to designing and preparing construction documents for complex drainage and water resource projects, including storm drain (RCP & RCB), concrete and earthen open channels, and energy dissipation facilities. Joshua also develops engineering calculations, cost estimates, and quantities, and leverages Python programming to streamline. His combination of technical design expertise and innovative problem -solving ensures efficient, high -quality projects delivered on schedule.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Woodcrest Rinehart Drainage Plan, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• Belle Terre Regional Infrastructure Water Storage, Eastern Municipal Water District
• North Indio Regional Flood Control Channel, Coachella Valley Water District • Third St Grade Separation, City of Riverside
• San Jacinto Valley MDP Line E Preliminary Design Report, San Jacinto Master Developer, LLC EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 9 Years
WEBB: 9 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Engineer in Training 168923 CA
CERTIFICATIONS:
Qualified Industrial Stormwater
Practitioner 00689
Geographic Information System
EDUCATION:
BS; Environmental Resources
Engineering
Humboldt University
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
28 NICHOLAS LOWE, MS, PE, TE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC &
TRANSPORTATION
Nick Lowe, MS, PE, TE, is a Deputy Director with WEBB's Traffic and Transportation Department. Nick assists clients with street improvements, traffic signal upgrades, and signing and striping modifications. He also develops temporary traffic control plans for construction while working closely with public agencies, contractors, and construction managers to safely expedite projects, thus minimizing impacts to traffic and businesses. Nick and his team also currently work with multiple public agencies as on -call engineers to help agencies keep projects moving forward.
In addition, Nick assists other engineers on street light installations, sewer and water plans, and expert witness testimony. He is also well -versed in the AutoTURN vehicle simulation program which assists in transportation improvements for constrained travel areas such as intersection curb returns and driveways. With increasing traffic pressure amid booming growth throughout Southern California, Nick's work on regional transportation solutions provides a tangible benefit to the public through improvements in safety, mobility, and quality of life. Nick is active in several industry associations.
Nick also provides grant funding assistance to cities including Carson, Los Angeles, Lake Elsinore, Palm Springs, and Cathedral City and has helped these cities secure nearly $100 million in funding to install bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, advanced dilemma zone detection, flashing beacons, and left turn phasing at over 50 signalized intersections.
1 EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 15 Years
WEBB: 14 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Civil Engineer C 87666 CA
Traffic Engineer TE 3065 CA
EDUCATION:
MS, Civil Engineering
University of Southern California
BS, Civil Engineering
Stevens Institute of Technology
AFFILIATIONS:
Institute of Transportation Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Intelligent Transportation Society of
California
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Arts and Music Line, Coachella Valley Association of Governments • Landau Boulevard at McCallum Way Traffic Signal Intersection Improvements, City of Cathedral City • Palm Springs HAWK Signal SB821, City of Palm Springs - Public Works • PLC North - Offsite Infrastructure Improvements, IDI Logistics • North Indio Channel Phase 1 and 2, Coachella Valley Water District • Indian Canyon Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements, City of Palm Springs • On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, City of Palm Springs • On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, City of Lake Elsinore • On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, City of Carson • On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, City of Cathedral City • On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, City of Hemet
• The Civic Center Storm Drain (SD2201) and Oasis Street Beautification (ST2303) Projects, City of Indio • On -Call Engineering Services, City of Indio
• Calhoun Street Improvement Project, City of Indio
• On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, County of Riverside • 4th Street Gravity Sewer Pipeline, Eastern Municipal Water District • Antonio Parkway Recycled Water Traffic Control Plans, Santa Margarita Water District • Recycled Water Program - Segment 3, Jurupa Community Services District • Cherry Valley Boulevard and Interstate 10 Interchange Improvements, TSG Cherry Valley, L.P. • Palm Canyon Pedestrian Safety Improvements, City of Palm Springs - Public Works • Perris Valley Storm Drain Trail, Phase 2 (Multi -Disciplinary Project), City of Perris • Highway Safety Improvement Program Application and Highway Safety Improvement Program Traffic Signal Improvements, City of Cathedral City
• Perris Valley Storm Drain Trail, Phase 2, City of Perris
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
29 JEFFREY HUTCHINS, PLA
MANAGER I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Jeff Hutchins, PLA, is the Manager of WEBB's Landscape Architecture Department with over 35 years of experience designing resilient, community -focused open spaces across Southern California. A licensed Landscape Architect, he brings a balanced approach that blends creative vision with technical precision to deliver sustainable, maintainable, and impactful projects.
Jeff manages projects from concept through construction, overseeing client coordination, environmental review, site analysis, material selection, cost estimating, and QA/QC. He excels in integrating site -specific solutions with long-term functionality, ensuring that design, budget, and constructability align from the outset.
His leadership supports seamless collaboration across WEBB's interdisciplinary teams and leverages advanced design tools to achieve cohesive, high -quality outcomes.
His portfolio includes iconic civic spaces such as SoFi Stadium, Dodger Stadium, the LA Zoo, and the George Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, as well as parks, greenways, and educational campuses. Jeff is known for transforming infrastructure into public assets, turning roadways into trails, linking public works with park systems, and designing parks that incorporate sustainable funding and programming models.
He has extensive experience with both K-12 and higher education institutions, including work with the LA Community College District, and regularly partners with public agencies and nonprofits to create outdoor environments that support student health and academic success.
As a department leader, Jeff mentors staff, elevates design standards, and advances WEBB's landscape practice. His commitment to sustainability and real -world solutions ensures every project is not only visionary but buildable and enduring.
EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 39 Years
WEBB: 6 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Landscape Architect PLA 3815 CA
EDUCATION:
BS, Landscape Architecture
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Landscape
Architects
Vice President of Programs (2013)
Southern California Chapter
Treasurer (2004-2009)
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona Landscape
Architecture
Advisory Board Member (former)
UCLA Landscape Architecture
Extension
Advisory Board Member (former)
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Hillcrest Park Master Plan, City of Fullerton
• Western Gage Median Park, City of Los Angeles
• Buchanan Elementary, City of Los Angeles
• Coachella Central Park, City of Coachella
• Sharp, Telfair, Haddon, and O'Melveny Elementary Schools, City of Los Angeles • The Great Park, City of Irvine (beginning stages design) • So-Fi Stadium, City of Inglewood
• George Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, City of Los Angeles • Green Valley Park, City of Perris
• Beverly Gardens Park Restoration Plan, City of Beverly Hills • Franklin Ivar Park, Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority • Vista Hermosa Park, Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority • BioTech Campus, City of Thousand Oaks
• Dodgers Stadium Site Improvement, City of Los Angeles • Faith and Hope Park, City of Los Angeles
• Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Highway, City of Long Beach • Hillcrest Park, City of Fullerton
• Ishihara Buffer Park, City of Santa Monica
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
30 STEPHANIE STANDERFER
VICE PRESIDENT I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Stephanie Standerfer is the Vice President and Director of WEBB's Environmental Services Department. She has over 25 years of experience as an environmental professional, specializing in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance for public and private clients. Her expertise reflects the dynamic and interdisciplinary nature of CEQA, and she serves as the Principal in Charge of the department, overseeing workload management, project progress, and staff development.
Stephanie has worked primarily in Inland Southern California, representing a wide range of clients including transportation agencies, healthcare providers, resource conservation districts, community college districts, local agency formation commissions, infrastructure districts, cities, counties, and private developers. Her diverse project experience enables her to anticipate and navigate challenges that arise during CEQA compliance. She regularly leads coordination among large teams of environmental planners, engineers, and agency staff, and actively guides clients through the complexities of environmental compliance.
In addition to her CEQA background, Stephanie has extensive habitat conservation experience and provides Expert Witness work in this field. For eight years, she served as contract staff to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), the agency responsible for implementing the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). In this role, she provided review, consultation, and training on MSHCP implementation procedures and policies. She developed guidance documents for the RCA and its 17 participating cities and worked closely with regulatory agencies to resolve compliance issues.
Her conservation biology and regulatory compliance leadership experience has fostered strong, collaborative relationships with regulatory bodies, allowing her to identify and address potential project issues proactively. She also led the preparation of conservation planning studies for the County of San Bernardino, including management of the San Bernardino County Regional Conservation Investment Strategy (RCIS), one of the few RCISs approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 28 Years
WEBB: 19 Years
a
Nivii "5]
EDUCATION:
MS, Environmental Sciences
Washington State University,
Pullman
BS, Environmental Sciences
University of California, Riverside
AFFILIATIONS:
American Planning Association
Association of Environmental
Professionals
President, Inland Empire Chapter
Greater Riverside Chamber of
Commerce
Chair -Elect
Executive Board
City of Riverside Cultural Heritage
Board
Chair (2003-2011)
Clients benefit from Stephanie's interdisciplinary background in environmental planning. Known as a CEQA authority, she frequently receives requests to provide peer reviews of environmental documents. Clients also seek Stephanie's strategic guidance on CEQA, regulatory compliance, and MSHCP expertise. She is a regular speaker at conferences and seminars across the state, sharing insights on environmental compliance. Stephanie values close collaboration with clients and colleagues and takes pride in building long-standing professional relationships.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Central Plaza Peer Review/MND, City of Lake Elsinore
• Banning Industrial EIR, Banning Industrial, LLP
• General Plan Update EIR (Beaumont 2040 Plan), City of Beaumont • Duke Warehouse at Patterson Avenue and Markham Street EIR, City of Perris • Perris Valley Storm Drain Trail and Street Improvement, IS/MND, City of Perris • Goodman Commerce Center EIR, City of Eastvale
• Villages of Lakeview Specific Plan EIR, County of Riverside • San Jacinto River Stage III Program EIR, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • WTP Upgrade and Brineline, IS/MND, CEQA-Plus and CEQA, City of Beaumont
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
31 REED CHILTON, PE, QSD
DIRECTOR I CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION
Reed Chilton, PE, QSD, is the Director of WEBB's Construction Management and Inspection and Land Survey and Mapping Department and brings extensive experience delivering complex public and private infrastructure projects from planning through construction completion. He specializes in managing large-scale, multi -discipline projects that require close coordination with public agencies, developers, contractors, and utility providers.
Reed oversees construction management, inspection, and survey services for a wide range of infrastructure improvements, including sewer and storm drain systems, domestic and recycled water pipelines, wastewater treatment facilities, dry utilities, street and highway improvements, street lighting, traffic signals, and associated landscaping. His experience spans projects in active roadways, operating facilities, environmentally sensitive areas, and high -profile public corridors where safety, continuity of service, and schedule control are critical.
Throughout his career, Reed has led all phases of construction delivery, including preparation of specifications and bid documents, contract administration, permitting, submittal and RFI coordination, change order negotiation, and review and approval of pay estimates. He is highly skilled in managing complex traffic control, utility conflicts, and multi -agency coordination, and is known for maintaining clear documentation and accountability to support agency compliance and funding requirements.
EXPERIENCE:
Industry: 16 Years
WEBB: 13 Years
REGISTRATIONS:
Civil Engineer C 83827 CA
CERTIFICATIONS:
Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD)
C83827
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering
Brigham Young University
Master of Science, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University
As a department director, Reed provides strategic oversight, mentoring, and quality control for multidisciplinary teams, ensuring projects are executed efficiently, safely, and in full compliance with contract requirements. His hands-on leadership and depth of technical and regulatory knowledge make him a trusted partner for clients seeking reliable delivery of critical infrastructure projects.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Highway 111 Off -Site Improvements - Detention Center Phase 1, County of Riverside Economic Development Agency
• Madison Street Improvements, City of Indio
• 21/22 Pavement Management, City of Indio
• Highway 111 Off -site Improvements - Detention Center Phase 2, City of Indio • Golden and College Reservoirs Evaluation and Replacement, Golden State Water Company • Granite Hill Water Transmission, Jurupa Community Services District • CIP and Development Inspection Services, Jurupa Community Services District • Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade and Expansion and Brine Line Design, City of Beaumont • Bain Street Waterline Repair and Replacement, Jurupa Community Services District • Huston Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Primary Clarifier and Dewatering Building Improvements, Crestline Sanitation District
• Perris Logistics Center North Off -site Improvements at Redlands/Ellis, IDI Logistics • Perris Logistics Center North I215/Bonnie Interchange, IDI Logistics • Water Reclamation Facility #1 Centrifuge Phase 2 Expansion, City of Corona Department of Water and Power • 14-MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority • On -Call Project Management and Construction, City of Irvine • Benedict Reservoir, Jurupa Community Services District • Downtown Sewer Replacement, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District • Rider III Distribution Center, IDI Logistics
A L B E R T A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
32 GEOCON
LISA BATTIATO, CEG, APM, LEED AP
REGIONAL MANAGER/SENIOR GEOLOGIST
Ms. Lisa Battiato has more than 27 years of
experience providing geologic consulting services
throughout California.
Her experience
encompasses a wide range of projects including
transportation and water infrastructure;
educational, medical, commercial, and industrial
facilities; mixed -use and multi -family residential
developments; and other large-scale land
developments. Her technical expertise includes
seismic hazard analyses; subsurface fault, landslide, liquefaction, and geotechnical investigations and assessments; geologic mapping; pavement distress mitigation; geotechnical services during utility installation and roadway construction; geologic evaluations of levee stability; project management services for large, hillside grading projects; and supervision of materials testing services during construction. Ms.
Battiato has been actively involved in determining methods and designs necessary for slope stabilization, seepage, mitigation of collapsible soils, induced soil settlement, expansive soils, subsurface dewatering, and drainage. Some of her relevant project experience includes:
CITY OF MENIFEE, ON -CALL GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT, MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA Geocon became an on -call consultant to the City of Menifee in 2018. We have provided geotechnical consultation during forensic investigation of Paloma Wash Trail, for the planning and design of Murrieta Road Pavement Recycling and Widening. We have worked with the City to provide the information to make reasonable, cost-effective planning decisions for the public infrastructure projects. Ms. Battiato serves as the project manager.
EXPERIENCE
27 years of experience
16 years with Geocon
EDUCATION
- BS, Geology, University of
California, Riverside
REGISTRATIONS
CA: Certified Engineering
Geologist, No. 2316
CA: Professional Geologist,
No. 7512
CERTIFICATIONS
Accredited Pavement
Manager
LEED Accredited
Professional
Envision Sustainability
Credential
Geothermal Professional
OSHA 40 -Hour
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
APWA
AEG
ASCE
Cal APA
IGS
Team RCD Director
PALOMA WASH TRAIL, MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA
Geocon performed geotechnical observation and testing services during construction of the Palomar Wash Trail Improvements project between Newport Road and Holland Road in the City of Menifee. The proposed improvements included removal and replacement of existing asphalt concrete pavement, accessible ramps, lighting, landscaping and hardscaping, and construction of a pedestrian crosswalk.
In addition, Geocon provided the initial pavement evaluation of the Paloma Wash Trail where we detailed the distress and provided solutions to prevent future distress as well as proposed remediation for the existing transverse cracking. Ms. Battiato was project manager during both project phases and performed the site evaluation and report principal review.
SALT CREEK TRAIL, CANYON LAKE, MENIFEE AND HEMET, CALIFORNIA Ms. Battiato managed Geocon's site reconnaissance for the proposed Salt Creek Trail beginning in Canyon Lake, passing through Menifee, and terminating in Hemet, California. We performed a site reconnaissance, a review of published geologic maps, published geologic reports, and previous geotechnical reports for projects near the proposed trail. Preliminary geotechnical recommendations were prepared for design of the proposed trail as well as geotechnical considerations for each of the anticipated trail crossings. Ms. Battiato ensured that Geocon's services were completed within budget and on schedule.
A L B E R T A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
UNDERGROUND SOLUTIONS
ILir
PCSiICI
ti
Education
1986-1989 Orange Glen High
School — Escondido, CA
Licenses/Certifications
10 -Hr OSHA, Competent
Person, BNSF Safety Course,
Staking University Certificate
of Locating Competency
(Electro-magnetic
instruments)
Years of Experience
28 years
Firm
Underground Solutions, Inc.
A L B E R T
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
Thomas C. Mueller, V.P. Field Operations
Project Manager I
Thomas (T.C.) Mueller has over twenty-five (25) years of hands-on general engineering contracting experience in the San Diego / Riverside area with emphasis on safety and production. Familiarity with various types of utility installation, soil conditions, excavation equipment, traffic control and safe practices. Past experience installing utilities is found to be invaluable in determining locations and depths of existing utilities when potholing.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Customer
Project Name
Description
Dates
Filanc
Contruction
P-1220 Raw Water
Pipeline — MCAS
Camp Pendleton
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation.
GPR/Electromagnetic utility
locating
4/2017 - Current
Reyes
Construction
P-132 Ordinance
Build-up Facility —
MCAS - Camp
Pendleton
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation.
GPR/Electromagnetic utility
locating
10/2016
Latitude 33
MCAS Yuma
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation.
GPR/Electromagnetic utility
locating
3/2016
University
Mechanical
P-250 Steam Plant
Decentralization —
MCRD - San Diego
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation.
GPR/Electromagnetic utility
locating
6/2016 - Current
GLR
Komada LPS
Munitions —
Vandenberg Air
Base - Lompoc
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation
3/2016
Eastern
Municipal Water
Dist.
2 -year Potholing
Agreement -As
Needed # 103601
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation
2016 - Current
Riverside Co.
Flood Control
FY 2013/14 & FY
2015/16 Multi Yr
Potholing
Agreement
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation
2015 - 2016
Kiewit/Shea
Desalination
Plant
Carlsbad
Desalination Plant
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation
3/2013 - 11/2015
Hazen and
Sawyer
(Coachella Valley
Dist. Pro'ect)
Chromium 6 Water
Treatment Facility
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation.
GPR/Electromagnetic utility
locating
2/2016 - 9/2016
Parsons
Brinckerhoff
Mid -Coast Trolley
Contract 5000932
Utility Potholing via Air
Excavation
3/2013 - 4/2016
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
34 Utility Specialists
Results through teamwork
Resumes
Tony L. Nissen — Principal
Seasoned construction and utility management professional with over 30 years of experience in project oversight, dry utility design, and infrastructure coordination. Proven ability to mitigate conflicts during design phases, streamline construction processes, and deliver projects on time and within budget.
Specific Responsibilities
Tony's responsibilities include oversight of corporate policies and procedures and management of the Inland Empire staff including dry utility planning, coordination, and project management. Preparation of dry utility designs, conflict mitigation, field verification and contractor bid package preparation and reconciliation are also tasks included within his scope of responsibility.
Project Experience and Responsibility
• City of Cypress — Cerritos Ave & Valley View St. Street Widening Project - Utility Project Manager - Study and review of street improvement plans for Cerritos Ave, Valley View Street & Ball Rd to determine conflicts with existing Dry Utility poles and infrastructure Project included meetings with utility representatives to discuss possible relocation scenarios and timeframes associated with each. I managed the design process through to the relocation of multiple 112kV Transmission Poles with 12kV underbuilt systems, telephone, cable TV, and natural gas systems.
• McCaII Blvd Street Widening Project, Menifee, Ca.: We are currently coordinating between the City of Menifee and SCE, SCG, Frontier, Charter Communications and Crown Castle (on behalf of Brookfield) to relocate existing poles and above ground structures along 2 miles of McCall Blvd in the City of Menifee, Ca.
• Audie Murphy Ranch — Menifee, Ca. Master planned community — 2,200 home master development.
Project involves conflicts, relocations, and conversions of 33kv and 12kv electric power lines.
Coordination and resolution of consents/grant out right of way conflicts with utility agency. Provide cost estimates and construction schedules pertaining to dry utility work. Coordination with engineer to provide design support consultation resolving proposed street improvements and dry utility facility locations. • Murrieta Marketplace — Murrieta, Ca. Commercial Retail Development consisting of major infrastructure planning and coordination. Winchester Rd (Highway 79) widening improvements. Project involves conflicts, relocations, and conversions of 33kv and 12kv electric power lines and transmission gas lines. Indentify and coordinate resolution of county road vacation and utility agency easement quitclaims. Responsible for coordination and planning with Caltrans, civil engineer, EMWD, and dry utility agencies to provide conflict resolution and construction management.
Rod Santos — Assistant Project Manager
Rod has over 4 years of experience in construction and dry utility management. Previously, he had experience constructing and managing renewable energy, specifically EV Charging, across the country as a project manager organizing and facilitating with JHAs, utility companies and contractors. Rod has been with Utility Specialists managing and coordinating dry utilities between SCE, local authorities and clients.
Specific Responsibilities
Rod's responsibilities include overseeing and managing projects in the Inland Empire. He works closely with SCE, developers and contractors to ensure projects progress and advance smoothly from initial conception to project completion.
Inland Empire Office
41870 Kalmia St, Suite 125
Murrieta, CA 92562
Phone: 951-834-9595
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
San Diego/Corporate Office
4429 Morena Blvd
San Diego, CA 92117
Phone: 858-581-2250
Orange County Office
25909 Pala, Suite 260
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Phone: 949-770-1900
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
MARSHALL PAYMARD
61 Blazewood, Foothill Ranch, CA, 92610 • Cell: (949) 356-8476 [email protected]
EDUCATION
6/2008
BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY (B.A), University of California, Santa Cruz
CERTIFICATIONS
• FAA Part 107 Commercial UAV Pilot Certification
• GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) Graduate Certificate, University of California Los Angeles (In Progress)
• Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(A) coastal California gnatcatcher permit (application process)
• Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(A) Quino checkerspot butterfly permit (application process)
• Wetland Training Institute (WTI)- Wetland Delineation Certificate • California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resource Board Visual Method 9 Emissions Evaluations Certificate
• Orange County Wildlife Trackers Certificate
PROFESSIONAL TRAININGS
• Southern California Chapter of The Wildlife Society (TWS)- Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus californicus) Workshop (Lecture and Survey Series)
• Wetland Training Institute (WTI)- Wetland Delineation and Advanced Hydric Soils • The Wildlife Society: Drone Technology & Regulation: A Workshop for Biologist • Sierra Research Station- Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (USFWS Accepted Training) • Southwest Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, Flat -tailed Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) Biological Monitor Training and Seminar • Desert Tortoise Council, Desert Tortoise Surveying, Monitoring, and Handling Techniques Workshop
• CNPS: Vegetation Mapping Workshop and Flora of the Sonoran Desert Workshop
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• The Wildlife Society
• Society of Wetland Scientist (SWS)
Paymard 116
A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S OC I AT E S
The cost proposal has been submitted separately, as requested in the RFP.
K. LICENSE AND INSURANCE CONFIRMATION
WEBB maintains comprehensive insurance coverage in full compliance with the requirements outlined in the RFP and Professional Service Agreement. We understand the importance of protecting our clients and organization throughout the project. Our insurance policies cover general liability, professional liability, workers' compensation, and automobile liability, ensuring that all aspects of the work are adequately insured.
WEBB confirms that we will obtain and maintain an active City of Beaumont Business License prior to contract execution and throughout the duration of the project, as required by Proposal Requirements Section K of the RFP. We understand this is a mandatory requirement for performing engineering design services for the Brookside Street Improvements project.
Our firm commits to providing proof of an active City of Beaumont Business License at the time of contract execution, and we will ensure the license remains current and in good standing for the entire term of the Professional Services Agreement.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
37 Ii
CO
O
I.,
cc
Z o-
WW�
to 2
gO
°O U
U
C
U
) oci
M N
o w O
_g0WN
w ' ILI
au N
W>+
JP,u) cp
Im CC 1—c.
LL
951.686.1070
3788 McCray Street
Riverside. CA 92506
Cost Proposal
Item
Description
Jeff T. Hart, Principal II
Joseph C. Caldwell,
Principal II
Eric Hays, Principal II
Ranjit Singh, Principal
Joshua J. O'Rourke,
Associate II
Haley C. Franco,
Assistant V
Reed E. Chilton,
Principal II
Stephanie N.
Standerfer, Principal II
Emily Webb, Associate
II
Noemi Avila, Assistant
II
Nicholas R. Lowe,
Principal II
Son H. Le, Senior I
Cole Benner, Assistant
V
Deborah A. Saulina,
Assistant V
Jeffrey P. Hutchins,
Senior II
Guillermo Gonzalez,
Assistant V
Joseph Chang,
Assistant IV
Michael E. Johnson,
Principal II
Jon Ros, Senior II
Riley Skvarca,
Assistant V
Asia Lazo, Project
Coordinator
2 -Man Survey Party
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Sub -consultant
budget
Expenses
Total/tasks
Billout Rate
$ 290
$ 290
$ 290
$ 275
$ 195
$ 170
$ 290
$ 290
$ 210
$ 140
$ 290
$ 225
$ 170
$ 170
$ 235
$ 170
$ 155
$ 290
$ 235
$ 170
$ 110
$ 291
Task 1 -
Project Management
6 9
78 16
8 106
20 3
3 8
257
$ 59,205
$ -
$ -
$ 59,100
1.1 Work Plan and Project Initiation
1 8
8 1
1 19
$ 4,430
$ -
$ 4,400
1.2 Meetings and Coordination
$ -
$ -
$ -
1.3 - Kickoff Meeting (1)
1 1
4 1
2 4
1 1
15 $ 3,610
$ -
$ 3,600
1.4 - Monthly Progress Meetings (13)
26 13
26 16
2 8
91 $ 21,885
$ -
$ 21,900
1.5 - Additional Coordination Meetings (2)
2 4
2 2
4 2
16 $ 3,940
$ -
$ 3,900
1.6 - City Council Meeting (1)
2 4
4 4
14 $ 3,200
$ -
$ 3,200
1.7 - Project Coordination - General (14 Months)
7 14
21 $ 4,410
$ -
$ 4,400
1.8 Project Schedule/Updates - (14 months)
7 14
21 $ 4,410
$ -
$ 4,400
1.9 Qa/Qc Coordination and Management (4 Submittals)
4 4
4 4
16 $ 4,160
$ -
$ 4,200
1.10 Shared Documents Folder Management (14 months)
14 2
16 $ 2,720
$ -
$ 2,700
1.11 Monthly Progress Reports and Invoice (14 Months)
14 14
28 $ 6,440
$ -
$ 6,400
Task 2 -
Data Gathering and Analysis
3 3
7 10
40 13
3 6
3 6
94 $ 20,130
$ -
$ -
$ 20,200
2.1 Project Database (gather, review, and compile data) 2 4
16 8
30 $ 6,160
$ -
$ 6,200
2.2 Basis of Design Memorandum - Draft
2 4
16 1
2 4
2 4
35 $ 7,370
$ -
$ 7,400
2.3 Basis of Design Memorandum - Final
2 8
1 1
2 1
2 17
$ 3,480
$ -
$ 3,500
2.5 Qa/Qc (2 submittals)
3 3
3 3
12 $ 3,120
$ -
$ 3,100
Task 3.1/3.2
- Survey and Control/Right of Way Base Map
2 3
7 3
20 9
8 16
9 2
24 103
$ 24,549
$ -
$ 160
$ 24,700
3.1 Field Topographic Mapping
2 4
2 1
3 9
1 16
38 $ 8,991
$ -
$ 107
$ 9,100
3.2 Right of Way Base Map
2 4
2 3
13 1
8 33
$ 8,063
$ -
$ 53
$ 8,100
3.2.1 Technical Memo - Draft
1 1
2 8
2 2
16 $ 3,610
$ -
$ 3,600
3.2.2 Technical Memo - Final
1 4
1 2
8 $ 1,805
$ -
$ 1,800
3.2.3 Qa/Qc (2 submittals)
2 2
2 2
8 $ 2,080
$ -
$ 2,100
Task 3.3
- Utility Research and Coordination
2 2
6 16
56 16
1 2
1 4
106
$ 22,789
$ 23,161
$ 359
$ 46,300
3.3.1 Field Review/Site Visit
1 2
8 11
$ 2,400
$ 1,150
$ 53
$ 3,600
3.3.2 USA Dry and Wet Utility Research
4 8
12 $ 2,140
$ 575
$ 200
$ 2,900
3.3.3 Preliminary Utility Base Map
4 8
12 $ 2,660
$ -
$ 2,700
3.3.4 Recommended Pothole Exhibit
1 2
4 7
$ 1,620
$ 575
$ 2,200
3.3.5 Subsurface Investigation - 10 potholes
Underground Solutions
1 4
2 1
2 1
4 15
$ 3,244
$ 17,986
$ 106
$ 21,300
3.3.6 Final Utility Base Map
1 2
4 7
$ 1,620
$ -
$ 1,600
3.3.7 Utilty Research - Draft Technical Memorandum (1st Submittal) 1 4
16 4
25 $ 5,190
$ 2,300
$ 7,500
3.3.8 Utilty Research - Final Technical Memorandum (2nd Submittal) 1 8
9 $ 1,835
$ 575
$ 2,400
3.3.9 Qa/Qc (2 submittals)
2 2
2 2
8 $ 2,080
$ -
$ 2,100
$ -
$ -
$ -
Task 3.4
- Geotechnical Investigation
1 2
4 2
9 $ 1,960
$ 19,884
$ -
$ 21,800
3.4.1 Geotechnical Investigation and Report
Geocon
1 2
4 2
9 $ 1,960
$ 19,884
$ 21,800
Task 3.5
- H&H Analysis
2 4
12 40
3 61
$ 13,350
$ -
$ -
$ 13,400
3.5.1 Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis
2 8
24 34
$ 7,460
$ -
$ 7,500
3.5.2 Technical Memorandum
1 4
16 2
23 $ 4,850
$ -
$ 4,900
3.5.3 Qa/Qc (1 submittal)
2 1
1 4
$ 1,040
$ -
$ 1,000
Task 4 -
Environmental Documentation and Regulatory Compliance
1 2
1 8
12 4
28 $ 6,250
$ 14,950
$ -
$ 21,200
4.1 CEQA NFA Letter
1 2
1 8
12 4
28 $ 6,250
$ -
$ 6,300
4.2 MSHCP Consistency Report = Osprey
$ -
$ 8,625
$ 8,600
4.3 BUOW Report = Osprey
$ -
$ 6,325
$ 6,300
A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S O C I AT E S
Item
Description
Jeff T. Hart, Principal II
Joseph C. Caldwell,
Principal II
Eric Hays, Principal II
Ranjit Singh, Principal
Joshua J. O'Rourke,
Associate II
Haley C. Franco,
Assistant V
Reed E. Chilton,
Principal II
Stephanie N.
Standerfer, Principal II
Emily Webb, Associate
II
Noemi Avila, Assistant
II
Nicholas R. Lowe,
Principal II
Son H. Le, Senior I
Cole Benner, Assistant
V
Deborah A. Saulina,
Assistant V
Jeffrey P. Hutchins,
Senior II
Guillermo Gonzalez,
Assistant V
Joseph Chang,
Assistant IV
Michael E. Johnson,
Principal II
Jon Ros, Senior II
Riley Skvarca,
Assistant V
Asia Lazo, Project
Coordinator
2 -Man Survey Party
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Sub -consultant
budget
Expenses
Total/tasks
Task 5.1
- 30% Submittal - Preliminary Design
4 6
21 38
112
8 4
12 30
80 12
2 16
345
$ 73,270
$ -
$ 200
$ 73,400
5.1.1 Street Improvement Concept Exhibit
4 12
16 32
$ 6,580
$ -
$ 6,600
5.1.2 Storm Drain Concept Exhibit
2 4
8 20
34 $ 7,840
$ -
$ 7,800
5.1.3 30% Street Improvement plans
8 16
60 84
$ 16,120
$ -
$ 16,100
5.1.4 30% concept landscape plans
6 2
16 24
$ 4,230
$ -
$ 4,200
5.1.5 30% Storm Drain Plan
8 24
80 4
116
$ 25,200
$ -
$ 25,200
5.1.6 Cost Estimate
1 2
8 2
4 17
$ 3,530
$ -
$ 3,500
5.1.7 Qa/Qc (2 submittal)
4 4
4 2
4 2
20 $ 5,450
$ -
$ 5,500
5.1.8 Field Walk
4 4
4 2
4 18
$ 4,320
$ -
$ 200
$ 4,500
Task 5.2
- 60% Submittal Package
2 2
25 60
164
6 2
10 46
148
6 18
8 62
559
$ 113,120
$ -
$ -
$ 113,100
5.2.1 Draft Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
2 8
24 34
$ 7,460
$ -
$ 7,500
5.2.2 60% Storm Drain Plans
16 32
100
4 152
$ 33,620
$ -
$ 33,600
5.2.3 60% Street Improvement/Signing & Striping plans
8 40
140
2 190
$ 35,460
$ -
$ 35,500
5.2.4 60% Landscape and Trail Plans
11 8
56 75
$ 12,625
$ -
$ 12,600
5.2.5 60% Cost Estimate
1 4
16 2
4 2
2 31
$ 6,420
$ -
$ 6,400
5.2.6 Draft Specifications
4 16
24 2
4 4
4 1
4 63
$ 13,935
$ -
$ 13,900
5.2.7 Qa/Qc (1 submittal)
2 2
2 2
2 4
14 $ 3,600
$ -
$ 3,600
Task 5.3
- 90% Submittal Package
2 2
17 38
148
6 8
10 46
128
4 18
4 46
477
$ 96,470
$ 8,625
$ -
$ 105,100
5.3.1 Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
1 4
16 21
$ 4,510
$ -
$ 4,500
5.3.2 90% Storm Drain Plans
8 16
80 4
108
$ 23,000
$ -
$ 23,000
5.3.3 90% Street Improvement/Signing & Striping/Traffic Control plans 8 40
120
2 170
$ 32,060
$ -
$ 32,100
5.3.4 90% Landscape and Trail Plans
8 4
40 52
$ 8,760
$ -
$ 8,800
5.3.5 Structural Calculations/details (Transition)
1 2
4 7
$ 1,620
$ 8,625
$ 10,200
5.3.6 90% Cost Estimate
1 2
8 2
4 2
2 21
$ 4,310
$ -
$ 4,300
5.3.7 90% Draft SWPPP
1 4
16 21
$ 4,510
$ -
$ 4,500
5.3.8 Erosion Control Plans
1 2
8 11
$ 2,400
$ -
$ 2,400
5.3.9 90% Specifications
2 8
16 2
4 4
2 4
4 46
$ 9,960
$ -
$ 10,000
5.3.10 Qa/Qc (1 submittal) and constructibilty Review
2 2
2 2
8 4
20 $ 5,340
$ -
$ 5,300
Task 5.4
-100% Submittal Package
2 4
11 18
48 2
2 4
14 20
8 2
135
$ 30,090
$ -
$ -
$ 30,100
5.4.1 Final signed plans
2 4
8 24
2 8
16 2
66 $ 14,190
$ -
$ 14,200
5.4.2 Final Specifications
2 4
8 1
4 2
21 $ 4,900
$ -
$ 4,900
5.4.3 Final Estimate
2 4
8 1
2 4
2 23
$ 5,130
$ -
$ 5,100
5.4.4 Final Draft SWPPP/Erosion Control Plans
1 2
8 11
$ 2,400
$ -
$ 2,400
5.4.5 Qa/Qc (1 submittal)
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 14
$ 3,470
$ -
$ 3,500
Task 6 -
Utility Relocation Coordination
10 20
18 48
$ 9,860
$ 33,925
$ -
$ 43,800
6.1 Wet Utilty Relocation Coordination - BCVWC Water Line 8 16
8 32
$ 6,800
$ -
$ 6,800
6.2 Dry Utility Relocation Coordination - Poles, gas, and Telecom 2 4
2 8
$ 1,700
$ 33,925
$ 35,600
6.3 Notice to Owners (60% and 90% submittals)
8 8
$ 1,360
$ -
$ 1,400
Task 7 -
Optional Tasks
10 28
10 6
12 1
67 $ 14,730
$ 9,315
$ -
$ 24,200
7.1 Lecals and Plats (2)
2 4
2 6
12 1
27 $ 6,370
$ -
$ 6,400
7.2 Additional Utility Relocation Coordination (Allowance 8 24
8 40
$ 8,360
$ -
$ 8,400
7.3/7.4
Focused BUOW burrow&species surveys =Osprey
$ -
$ 3,565
$ 3,600
7.5 NEPSSA = Osprey
$ -
$ 5,750
$ 5,800
Total
23 33
198
213
690
200
16 11
12 10
59 136
382
13 59
16 132
14 29
11 4
28 2289
$ 485,773
$109,860
$ 719
$ 596,400
A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S O C I AT E S
Cost Proposal Breakdown
WEBB Associates
Total/task
Stormdrain, Street, Access Trail and Environmental
$ 471,600
Subtotal
$ 471,600
Subconsultants
Geotechnical
$ 19,900
Potholes/Utility Research
$ 23,200
MSHCP Consistency
$ 8,625
Burrowing Owl Report
$ 6,325
Structural Calculations
$ 8,625
Dry Utility Relocation
$ 33,925
Subtotal
$ 100,600
Total
$ 572,200
Optional Tasks
Legals and Plats (2)
$ 6,400
Additional Utility Relocation Coordination (Allowance)
$ 8,400
Focused BUOW burrow&species surveys Osprey
$ 3,600
NEPSSA Osprey
$ 5,800
In Addition to Total
$ 24,200
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Hourly Rate Schedule
CLASSIFICATION
Engineers/Project Managers/Planners/Scientists/
Assessment/Special Tax Consultants/Landscape Architects/Designers Principal II
Principal I
Senior III
Senior II
Senior I
Associate I I I
Associate II
Associate I
Assistant V
Assistant IV
Assistant I I I
Assistant II
Assistant I
Survey Services
Rates
$/Hour
290.00
275.00
245.00
235.00
225.00
210.00
195.00
185.00
170.00
155.00
140.00
130.00
95.00 2 -Person Survey Party 291.00
1 -Person Survey Party 201.00
Inspection Services
Construction Manager 245.00
Inspector (Non -Prevailing Wage) 136.00
Inspector Overtime (Non -Prevailing Wage) 185.00
Inspector (Prevailing Wage) 147.00
Inspector Overtime (Prevailing Wage) 195.00
Administrative Services
Project Coordinator 110.00
Administrative Assistant III 99.00
Administrative Assistant II 88.00
Administrative Assistant I 70.00
Other Direct Expenses
Incidental Charges Cost + 15%
Postage Cost
Subcontracted Services Cost + 15%
Special Consultant 355.00
Survey/Inspection Per Diem Prevailing Wage Rate
In -House Delivery Up to 1/2 hour 31.00
In -House Delivery 1/2 Hour up to 1 Hour 62.00
In -House Delivery Over 1 Hour up to 2 Hours 114.00
In -House Delivery Over 2 Hours 165.00
Survey/Inspection Vehicle 0.81/Mile
Mileage 0.72/Mile
Note: All rates are subject to change based on annual inflation and cost of living adjustments. Prevailing wages are dictated by the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). As such, the indicated rate will remain in effect until revised rates are published by the DIR. The rate shown shall be subject to renegotiation to remain in compliance with State requirements if prevailing wages are increased by the DIR.
A FINANCE CHARGE of 1 % % per month (18% per year) will be added to any unpaid amount commencing thirty (30) days from invoice date. A mechanic's lien may be filed for any invoice remaining unpaid after thirty (30) days from invoice date.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
5 C26-26
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ("Agreement") is made and effective on this day of , by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT, a California municipal corporation ("City") whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223, and Albert A. Webb Associates, a California corporation whose address is 3788 McCray Street Riverside, California 92506 ("Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "parties."
RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understanding, and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:
A. City desires to engage Contractor to provide the following services: Engineering Design Services for Capital Improvement Project R26-08: Brookside Street Improvements; and, B. Contractor has made a proposal ("Proposal") to the City to provide such professional services, which Proposal Scope of Services is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and,
C. Contractor agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to City that Contractor possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel, and equipment to provide such services.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows:
1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall automatically terminate on April 30, 2029, unless extended by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the City.
C26-26
2. Services to be Performed. Contractor agrees to provide the services ("Services") as follows: Engineering Design Services for Capital Improvement Project R26-08: Brookside Street Improvements in accordance with Exhibit "A". All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. Contractor designates Joseph Caldwell, as Contractor's Representative responsible for overseeing the Services provided by Contractor ("Contractor's Representative"). City designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as the Project Manager ("Project Manager") in connection with the delivery of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall supply, at its sole expense, all equipment, tools, materials, and supplies necessary to perform Services. In the event that the Proposal contains terms that are in addition to or in conflict with this Agreement, other than the price for Services, such terms shall not be valid and shall be of no force or effect.
3. Associates and Subcontractors. Contractor may, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors, and consultants as Contractor deems necessary to perform the Services; provided, however, that Contractor shall not subcontract any of the Services without the prior written consent of City.
4. Compensation.
4.01 Contractor shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Proposal and shall not increase any rate without the prior written consent of the City. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, total fees and charges paid by City to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of Five Hundred Ninety -Six Thousand Four Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($596,400.00).
4.02 Contractor shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the City, in writing.
4.03 Contractor shall submit to City, on or before the fifteenth (15th) of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The City shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. City shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to Contractor. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to City's:
a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;
b. Verification that the hours billed, when multiplied by the approved hourly rates, result in the correct total;
C26-26
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If City determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, City shall either return the bill to Contractor with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly and give notice to Contractor of the adjustment.
4.04 If the work is satisfactorily completed, City shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Should City dispute any portion of any invoice, City shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advise Contractor in writing of the disputed portion.
5. Obligations of Contractor.
5.01 Contractor agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proposal. In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement or contain additional terms that purport to bind the City other than the Services to be rendered and the hourly rate for the Services, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.
5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, Contractor will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. Contractor shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers. Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.
5.03 Contractor shall keep City informed as to the progress of the Services by means of regular and frequent consultations. Additionally, when requested by City, Contractor shall prepare written status reports.
5.04 Contractor is responsible for paying, when due, all income and other taxes, fees, and withholding, including withholding state and federal taxes, social security, unemployment and worker's compensation, incurred as a result of the compensation paid under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by City resulting from Contractor's failure to comply with this provision.
5.05 In the event Contractor is required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications and/or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
C26-26
5.06 Contractor represents that it possesses all required licenses necessary or applicable to the performance of Services under this Agreement and the Proposal and shall obtain and keep in full force and effect all permits and approvals required to perform the Services herein.
In the event City is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, Contractor shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.
5.07 Contractor shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment Eligibility Verification information from Contractor's employees, in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and shall ensure that Contractor's employees are eligible to work in the United States.
5.08 In the event that Contractor employs, contracts with, or otherwise utilizes any Ca1PERS retirees in completing any of the Services performed hereunder, such instances shall be disclosed in advance to the City and shall be subject to the City's advance written approval.
5.09 Drug -free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Contractor hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug -free workplace.
5.10 Contractor shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder including, but not limited to California Depailinent of Industrial Relations (Cal/OSHA) regulations; and the U.S. Department of Transportation Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act, related to their scope of work and operations. In case of conflict, the most stringent shall apply.
5.11 Contractor shall keep itself informed concerning and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any federal, state or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.
5.12 By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that Contractor (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the conditions, circumstances, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Contractor warrants that Contractor has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should the Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Contractor
C26-26
shall immediately inform the City of such facts and shall not proceed except at Contractor's sole risk until written instructions are received from the Project Manager.
Contractor warrants all Services under the Agreement to be of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material and workmanship. Contractor agrees that for a period of one year (or the period of time specified elsewhere in the Agreement or in any guarantee or warranty provided by any manufacturer or supplier of equipment or materials incorporated into the Services, whichever is later) after the date of final acceptance, Contractor shall within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the City of any defect in the Services or non-conformance of the Services to the Agreement, commence and prosecute with due diligence all Services necessary to fulfill the terms of the warranty at Contractor's sole cost and expense. Contractor shall act sooner as requested by the City in response to an emergency. In addition, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair and replace any portions of the Services (or work of other contractors) damaged by Contractor's defective Services or which becomes damaged in the course of repairing or replacing defective Services. For any Services so corrected, Contractor's obligation hereunder to correct defective Services shall be reinstated for an additional one-year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected Services. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor.
In the event that Contractor fails to fulfil its obligations under this Section, or under any other warranty or guaranty under this Agreement, to the satisfaction of the City, the City shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non -conforming Services and any work damaged by such services or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor's sole expense. Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the City for any expenses incurred hereunder upon demand.
Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.
5.13 Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
6. Insurance. Contractor hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal -OSHA.
Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" are copies of Certificates of Insurance and endorsements as required by Section 7.02.
If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Contractor shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:
C26-26
6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 in the aggregate; Contractor agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured's City, its officials, employees and agents. Contractor also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.
6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident.
If Contractor or Contractor's employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, Contractor shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.
6.03 Workers' Compensation insurance for any of Contractor's employees that will be providing any Services hereunder. Contractor will have a state -approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by California law. The provisions of any Workers' Compensation insurance will not limit the obligations of Contractor under this Agreement.
Contractor expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents. Sole proprietors with no employees, LLCs, or partnerships using the services of members or partners who do not carry Workers' Compensation insurance acknowledge that they are not subject to the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of California and agree to complete a signed workers' compensation exemption form.
6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required _ /Not Required (X); Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by Contractor, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for City.
6.05 Cyber Liability Insurance REQUIRED IF CHECKED HERE ONLY [ (Technology Professional Liability — Errors and Omissions), with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate or the full per occurrence limits of the policies available, whichever is greater. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Contractor in this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations. Contractor will file with City, before beginning professional services, certificates of insurance (Acord Form 25 or equivalent) satisfactory to City evidencing.
C26-26
6.06 If Claims Made Policies (applies only to professional liability and cyber liability policies):
i. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
ii. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the contract work.
7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage.
7.01 No liability insurance coverage provided shall prohibit Contractor from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contractor waives all rights of subrogation against City regardless of the applicability of insurance proceeds and shall require all contractors and subcontractors to do the same.
7.02 Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish City with certificates of insurance, endorsements, and upon request, complete copies of all policies, including complete copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf.
7.03 All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a minimum A.M. Best rating of "A:VII". The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business in California. The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.
7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.
Contractor acknowledges and agrees that that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contractor or any subcontractor, shall apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance, indemnity or self-insurance available to City.
7.05 All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by City, as the need arises. Contractor shall not make any reductions
C26-26
in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent.
7.06 Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contractor or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.
7.07 The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers. If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
8. Indemnification.
8.01 Contractor and City agree that City, its employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys' fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way related to the performance of this Agreement by Contractor or any subcontractor or agent of either as set forth herein. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to City. Contractor acknowledges that City would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of Contractor to defend, indemnify, and protect City as set forth herein.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its employees, agents and officials, from and against any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, injuries, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys' fees incurred by City, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of, or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement.
Contractor's obligation to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits, and proceedings in which Contractor (and/or Contractor's agents and/or employees) is alleged to be an employee of City. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by Contractor as they are incurred by City.
C26-26
b. Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement or this Section, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of City, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8A Indemnification Design Professionals. In the event that Contractor is a design professional under California Civil Code Section 2782.8 this Section 8A shall apply instead of Section 8. To the fullest extent permitted by California law and in accordance with California Civil Code section 2782.8, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, trustees and members ("Indemnified Parties") from any and all actions, assessments, counts, citations, claims, costs, damages, demands, judgments, liabilities (legal, administrative or otherwise), losses, notices, expenses, fines, penalties, proceedings, responsibilities, violations, attorney's and consultants' fees and causes of action including, but not limited to those for, injury to property or persons, including personal injury and/or death ("Claim(s)"), to the extent that the Claim(s) arises out of, pertains to, or relates to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its directors, officials, officers, employees and consultants arising out of, connected with, or resulting from the performance of the Services, the Project, or this Agreement. This indemnity excludes liability caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnified Parties. The cost to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend charged to Contractor shall not exceed Contractor's proportionate percentage of fault.
9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.
9.01. In the event Contractor performs additional or different services than those described herein without the prior written approval of the City Manager and/or City Council of City, Contractor shall not be compensated for such services. Contractor expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the City in writing.
9.02 Contractor shall promptly advise the City Manager and Finance Director of City as soon as reasonably practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events which may affect the scope and/or cost of Services. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and/or requests for additional services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the City and/or City Council.
10. Termination of Agreement.
10.01. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, or for no cause, at any time by giving twenty (20) days' written notice to Contractor.
C26-26
10.02 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due Contractor for undisputed Services performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within thirty (30) business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement. Immediately upon termination, Contractor agrees to promptly provide and deliver to City all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of Contractor and pertain to City.
11. Status of Contractor.
11.01 Contractor shall perform the Services in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling, and not as an employee of City. However, Contractor shall regularly confer with City's City Manager or Project Manager as provided for in this Agreement.
11.02 Contractor agrees that it is not entitled to the rights and benefits afforded to City's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, Workers' Compensation, retirement, Ca1PERS, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Contractor is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, Workers' Compensation and other insurance, training, permits, and licenses for itself and its employees and subcontractors.
11.03 Contractor hereby specifically represents and warrants to City that it possesses the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of City and that the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services in the same geographic area where the City is located. Further, Contractor represents and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor has the full authority to bind Contractor to this Agreement.
12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.
12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties, and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed, or obtained by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services performed for the City shall become the sole property of City, and Contractor shall promptly deliver all such materials to City upon request. At the City's sole discretion, Contractor may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to City upon request, at no cost to City.
Page of 1910
C26-26
12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, City shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement.
Contractor shall not use such data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall Contractor release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of City.
12.03 Contractor shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all-time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as City may deem necessary, Contractor shall make available to City's agents for examination all of such records and shall permit City's agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.
13. Miscellaneous Provisions.
13.01 This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of Services by Contractor for City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such Services in any manner whatsoever. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties.
13.02 Contractor shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of City. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.
13.03 Contractor shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with City if required by California law and/or the City's conflict of interest policy.
13.04 If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.
13.05 This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California. The parties agree that venue in any litigation between them shall be in Riverside County, California.
C26-26
13.06 Contractor covenants that neither it nor any officer or principal of its firm has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, either directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their Services hereunder. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.
13.07 Contractor has read and is aware of the provisions of Section 1090 et seq. and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code relating to conflicts of interest of public officers and employees. Contractor agrees that they are unaware of any financial or economic interest of any public officer or employee of the City relating to this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that if such a financial interest does exist at the inception of this Agreement, the City may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving notice thereof. Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.
13.08 Improper Consideration. Contractor shall not offer (either directly or through an intermediary) any improper consideration such as, but not limited to, cash, discounts, services, the provision of travel or entertainment, or any items of value to any officer, employee or agent of the City in an attempt to secure favorable treatment regarding this Agreement or any contract awarded by City. The City, by notice, may immediately terminate this Agreement if it determines that any improper consideration as described in the preceding sentence was offered to any officer, employee or agent of the City with respect to the proposal and award process of this Agreement or any City contract. This prohibition shall apply to any amendment, extension or evaluation process once this Agreement or any City contract has been awarded. Contractor shall immediately report any attempt by any City officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from Contractor. 13M9 Severability. If any portion, section, sentence, provision or paragraph of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.
13.10 Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall be responsible to comply with applicable prevailing wages laws. As a condition of payment, if applicable Contractor shall show proof of payment of wages under applicable state and federal laws and regulations relating to prevailing wages in accordance with the "General Wage Determination Made By the Director of Industrial Relations Pursuant To California Labor Code, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, Sections 1770, 1773 and 1773.1", for Riverside County and/or 40 U.S.C. Section 276a, et. seq. Such wage rates shall conform with those posted at City offices and the project site. In the event that the Contractor fails to pay the prevailing wages, the Contractor shall be solely liable for penalties and for the Page of 1910
C26-26
shortfall in wages and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City under Section 8.01 against any of the same. The following Labor Code sections are hereby referenced and made a part of this Agreement:
1. Section 1775 - Penalty for Failure to Comply with Prevailing Wage Rates.
2. Section 1777.4 - Apprenticeship Requirements.
3. Section 1777.5 - Apprenticeship Requirements.
4. Section 1813 - Penalty for Failure to Pay Overtime.
5. Sections 1810 and 1811 - Working Hour Restrictions.
6. Section 1776 - Payroll Records.
7. Section 1773.8 - Travel and Subsistence Pay.
13.11 Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry.
13.12 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.
Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or Services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non -defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
13.13 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.
13.14 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement.
C26-26
13.15 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
13.16 Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.
13.17 The recitals set forth in the preamble of this Agreement are hereby incorporated into and made a substantive part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
13.18 Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party ("electronic signature"). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
C26-26
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above written.
CITY:
CITY OF BEAUMONT
By: By:
Print
Name:
Date:
ATTEST:
By:
Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
John O. Pinkney, City Attorney
Date:
CONTRACTOR:
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Digitally signed by Joseph C. Caldwell
DM: F -US, [email protected],
O=Albert A. Webb Assodates, CN=Joseph C.
Caldwell
Reason: I agree to the teams defined by the
placement of my signature on Nis document
Date: 2026.04.1413:34:56-0700'
Print
Name: Joseph C. Caldwell
Date: 4/14/2026
C26-26
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSAL -SCOPE OF SERVICES
CO
O
I.,
cc
Z o-
WW�
to 2
gO
°O U
U
C
U
) oci
M N
o w O
_g0WN
w ' ILI
au N
W>+
JP,u) cp
Im CC 1—c.
LL
951.686.1070
3788 McCray Street
Riverside. CA 92506
Cost Proposal
Item
Description
Jeff T. Hart, Principal II
Joseph C. Caldwell,
Principal II
Eric Hays, Principal II
Ranjit Singh, Principal
Joshua J. O'Rourke,
Associate II
Haley C. Franco,
Assistant V
Reed E. Chilton,
Principal II
Stephanie N.
Standerfer, Principal II
Emily Webb, Associate
II
Noemi Avila, Assistant
II
Nicholas R. Lowe,
Principal II
Son H. Le, Senior I
Cole Benner, Assistant
V
Deborah A. Saulina,
Assistant V
Jeffrey P. Hutchins,
Senior II
Guillermo Gonzalez,
Assistant V
Joseph Chang,
Assistant IV
Michael E. Johnson,
Principal II
Jon Ros, Senior II
Riley Skvarca,
Assistant V
Asia Lazo, Project
Coordinator
2 -Man Survey Party
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Sub -consultant
budget
Expenses
Total/tasks
Billout Rate
$ 290
$ 290
$ 290
$ 275
$ 195
$ 170
$ 290
$ 290
$ 210
$ 140
$ 290
$ 225
$ 170
$ 170
$ 235
$ 170
$ 155
$ 290
$ 235
$ 170
$ 110
$ 291
Task 1 -
Project Management
6 9
78 16
8 106
20 3
3 8
257
$ 59,205
$ -
$ -
$ 59,100
1.1 Work Plan and Project Initiation
1 8
8 1
1 19
$ 4,430
$ -
$ 4,400
1.2 Meetings and Coordination
$ -
$ -
$ -
1.3 - Kickoff Meeting (1)
1 1
4 1
2 4
1 1
15 $ 3,610
$ -
$ 3,600
1.4 - Monthly Progress Meetings (13)
26 13
26 16
2 8
91 $ 21,885
$ -
$ 21,900
1.5 - Additional Coordination Meetings (2)
2 4
2 2
4 2
16 $ 3,940
$ -
$ 3,900
1.6 - City Council Meeting (1)
2 4
4 4
14 $ 3,200
$ -
$ 3,200
1.7 - Project Coordination - General (14 Months)
7 14
21 $ 4,410
$ -
$ 4,400
1.8 Project Schedule/Updates - (14 months)
7 14
21 $ 4,410
$ -
$ 4,400
1.9 Qa/Qc Coordination and Management (4 Submittals)
4 4
4 4
16 $ 4,160
$ -
$ 4,200
1.10 Shared Documents Folder Management (14 months)
14 2
16 $ 2,720
$ -
$ 2,700
1.11 Monthly Progress Reports and Invoice (14 Months)
14 14
28 $ 6,440
$ -
$ 6,400
Task 2 -
Data Gathering and Analysis
3 3
7 10
40 13
3 6
3 6
94 $ 20,130
$ -
$ -
$ 20,200
2.1 Project Database (gather, review, and compile data) 2 4
16 8
30 $ 6,160
$ -
$ 6,200
2.2 Basis of Design Memorandum - Draft
2 4
16 1
2 4
2 4
35 $ 7,370
$ -
$ 7,400
2.3 Basis of Design Memorandum - Final
2 8
1 1
2 1
2 17
$ 3,480
$ -
$ 3,500
2.5 Qa/Qc (2 submittals)
3 3
3 3
12 $ 3,120
$ -
$ 3,100
Task 3.1/3.2
- Survey and Control/Right of Way Base Map
2 3
7 3
20 9
8 16
9 2
24 103
$ 24,549
$ -
$ 160
$ 24,700
3.1 Field Topographic Mapping
2 4
2 1
3 9
1 16
38 $ 8,991
$ -
$ 107
$ 9,100
3.2 Right of Way Base Map
2 4
2 3
13 1
8 33
$ 8,063
$ -
$ 53
$ 8,100
3.2.1 Technical Memo - Draft
1 1
2 8
2 2
16 $ 3,610
$ -
$ 3,600
3.2.2 Technical Memo - Final
1 4
1 2
8 $ 1,805
$ -
$ 1,800
3.2.3 Qa/Qc (2 submittals)
2 2
2 2
8 $ 2,080
$ -
$ 2,100
Task 3.3
- Utility Research and Coordination
2 2
6 16
56 16
1 2
1 4
106
$ 22,789
$ 23,161
$ 359
$ 46,300
3.3.1 Field Review/Site Visit
1 2
8 11
$ 2,400
$ 1,150
$ 53
$ 3,600
3.3.2 USA Dry and Wet Utility Research
4 8
12 $ 2,140
$ 575
$ 200
$ 2,900
3.3.3 Preliminary Utility Base Map
4 8
12 $ 2,660
$ -
$ 2,700
3.3.4 Recommended Pothole Exhibit
1 2
4 7
$ 1,620
$ 575
$ 2,200
3.3.5 Subsurface Investigation - 10 potholes
Underground Solutions
1 4
2 1
2 1
4 15
$ 3,244
$ 17,986
$ 106
$ 21,300
3.3.6 Final Utility Base Map
1 2
4 7
$ 1,620
$ -
$ 1,600
3.3.7 Utilty Research - Draft Technical Memorandum (1st Submittal) 1 4
16 4
25 $ 5,190
$ 2,300
$ 7,500
3.3.8 Utilty Research - Final Technical Memorandum (2nd Submittal) 1 8
9 $ 1,835
$ 575
$ 2,400
3.3.9 Qa/Qc (2 submittals)
2 2
2 2
8 $ 2,080
$ -
$ 2,100
$ -
$ -
$ -
Task 3.4
- Geotechnical Investigation
1 2
4 2
9 $ 1,960
$ 19,884
$ -
$ 21,800
3.4.1 Geotechnical Investigation and Report
Geocon
1 2
4 2
9 $ 1,960
$ 19,884
$ 21,800
Task 3.5
- H&H Analysis
2 4
12 40
3 61
$ 13,350
$ -
$ -
$ 13,400
3.5.1 Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis
2 8
24 34
$ 7,460
$ -
$ 7,500
3.5.2 Technical Memorandum
1 4
16 2
23 $ 4,850
$ -
$ 4,900
3.5.3 Qa/Qc (1 submittal)
2 1
1 4
$ 1,040
$ -
$ 1,000
Task 4 -
Environmental Documentation and Regulatory Compliance
1 2
1 8
12 4
28 $ 6,250
$ 14,950
$ -
$ 21,200
4.1 CEQA NFA Letter
1 2
1 8
12 4
28 $ 6,250
$ -
$ 6,300
4.2 MSHCP Consistency Report = Osprey
$ -
$ 8,625
$ 8,600
4.3 BUOW Report = Osprey
$ -
$ 6,325
$ 6,300
A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S O C I AT E S
Item
Description
Jeff T. Hart, Principal II
Joseph C. Caldwell,
Principal II
Eric Hays, Principal II
Ranjit Singh, Principal
Joshua J. O'Rourke,
Associate II
Haley C. Franco,
Assistant V
Reed E. Chilton,
Principal II
Stephanie N.
Standerfer, Principal II
Emily Webb, Associate
II
Noemi Avila, Assistant
II
Nicholas R. Lowe,
Principal II
Son H. Le, Senior I
Cole Benner, Assistant
V
Deborah A. Saulina,
Assistant V
Jeffrey P. Hutchins,
Senior II
Guillermo Gonzalez,
Assistant V
Joseph Chang,
Assistant IV
Michael E. Johnson,
Principal II
Jon Ros, Senior II
Riley Skvarca,
Assistant V
Asia Lazo, Project
Coordinator
2 -Man Survey Party
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Sub -consultant
budget
Expenses
Total/tasks
Task 5.1
- 30% Submittal - Preliminary Design
4 6
21 38
112
8 4
12 30
80 12
2 16
345
$ 73,270
$ -
$ 200
$ 73,400
5.1.1 Street Improvement Concept Exhibit
4 12
16 32
$ 6,580
$ -
$ 6,600
5.1.2 Storm Drain Concept Exhibit
2 4
8 20
34 $ 7,840
$ -
$ 7,800
5.1.3 30% Street Improvement plans
8 16
60 84
$ 16,120
$ -
$ 16,100
5.1.4 30% concept landscape plans
6 2
16 24
$ 4,230
$ -
$ 4,200
5.1.5 30% Storm Drain Plan
8 24
80 4
116
$ 25,200
$ -
$ 25,200
5.1.6 Cost Estimate
1 2
8 2
4 17
$ 3,530
$ -
$ 3,500
5.1.7 Qa/Qc (2 submittal)
4 4
4 2
4 2
20 $ 5,450
$ -
$ 5,500
5.1.8 Field Walk
4 4
4 2
4 18
$ 4,320
$ -
$ 200
$ 4,500
Task 5.2
- 60% Submittal Package
2 2
25 60
164
6 2
10 46
148
6 18
8 62
559
$ 113,120
$ -
$ -
$ 113,100
5.2.1 Draft Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
2 8
24 34
$ 7,460
$ -
$ 7,500
5.2.2 60% Storm Drain Plans
16 32
100
4 152
$ 33,620
$ -
$ 33,600
5.2.3 60% Street Improvement/Signing & Striping plans
8 40
140
2 190
$ 35,460
$ -
$ 35,500
5.2.4 60% Landscape and Trail Plans
11 8
56 75
$ 12,625
$ -
$ 12,600
5.2.5 60% Cost Estimate
1 4
16 2
4 2
2 31
$ 6,420
$ -
$ 6,400
5.2.6 Draft Specifications
4 16
24 2
4 4
4 1
4 63
$ 13,935
$ -
$ 13,900
5.2.7 Qa/Qc (1 submittal)
2 2
2 2
2 4
14 $ 3,600
$ -
$ 3,600
Task 5.3
- 90% Submittal Package
2 2
17 38
148
6 8
10 46
128
4 18
4 46
477
$ 96,470
$ 8,625
$ -
$ 105,100
5.3.1 Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
1 4
16 21
$ 4,510
$ -
$ 4,500
5.3.2 90% Storm Drain Plans
8 16
80 4
108
$ 23,000
$ -
$ 23,000
5.3.3 90% Street Improvement/Signing & Striping/Traffic Control plans 8 40
120
2 170
$ 32,060
$ -
$ 32,100
5.3.4 90% Landscape and Trail Plans
8 4
40 52
$ 8,760
$ -
$ 8,800
5.3.5 Structural Calculations/details (Transition)
1 2
4 7
$ 1,620
$ 8,625
$ 10,200
5.3.6 90% Cost Estimate
1 2
8 2
4 2
2 21
$ 4,310
$ -
$ 4,300
5.3.7 90% Draft SWPPP
1 4
16 21
$ 4,510
$ -
$ 4,500
5.3.8 Erosion Control Plans
1 2
8 11
$ 2,400
$ -
$ 2,400
5.3.9 90% Specifications
2 8
16 2
4 4
2 4
4 46
$ 9,960
$ -
$ 10,000
5.3.10 Qa/Qc (1 submittal) and constructibilty Review
2 2
2 2
8 4
20 $ 5,340
$ -
$ 5,300
Task 5.4
-100% Submittal Package
2 4
11 18
48 2
2 4
14 20
8 2
135
$ 30,090
$ -
$ -
$ 30,100
5.4.1 Final signed plans
2 4
8 24
2 8
16 2
66 $ 14,190
$ -
$ 14,200
5.4.2 Final Specifications
2 4
8 1
4 2
21 $ 4,900
$ -
$ 4,900
5.4.3 Final Estimate
2 4
8 1
2 4
2 23
$ 5,130
$ -
$ 5,100
5.4.4 Final Draft SWPPP/Erosion Control Plans
1 2
8 11
$ 2,400
$ -
$ 2,400
5.4.5 Qa/Qc (1 submittal)
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 14
$ 3,470
$ -
$ 3,500
Task 6 -
Utility Relocation Coordination
10 20
18 48
$ 9,860
$ 33,925
$ -
$ 43,800
6.1 Wet Utilty Relocation Coordination - BCVWC Water Line 8 16
8 32
$ 6,800
$ -
$ 6,800
6.2 Dry Utility Relocation Coordination - Poles, gas, and Telecom 2 4
2 8
$ 1,700
$ 33,925
$ 35,600
6.3 Notice to Owners (60% and 90% submittals)
8 8
$ 1,360
$ -
$ 1,400
Task 7 -
Optional Tasks
10 28
10 6
12 1
67 $ 14,730
$ 9,315
$ -
$ 24,200
7.1 Lecals and Plats (2)
2 4
2 6
12 1
27 $ 6,370
$ -
$ 6,400
7.2 Additional Utility Relocation Coordination (Allowance 8 24
8 40
$ 8,360
$ -
$ 8,400
7.3/7.4
Focused BUOW burrow&species surveys =Osprey
$ -
$ 3,565
$ 3,600
7.5 NEPSSA = Osprey
$ -
$ 5,750
$ 5,800
Total
23 33
198
213
690
200
16 11
12 10
59 136
382
13 59
16 132
14 29
11 4
28 2289
$ 485,773
$109,860
$ 719
$ 596,400
A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S O C I AT E S
Cost Proposal Breakdown
WEBB Associates
Total/task
Stormdrain, Street, Access Trail and Environmental
$ 471,600
Subtotal
$ 471,600
Subconsultants
Geotechnical
$ 19,900
Potholes/Utility Research
$ 23,200
MSHCP Consistency
$ 8,625
Burrowing Owl Report
$ 6,325
Structural Calculations
$ 8,625
Dry Utility Relocation
$ 33,925
Subtotal
$ 100,600
Total
$ 572,200
Optional Tasks
Legals and Plats (2)
$ 6,400
Additional Utility Relocation Coordination (Allowance)
$ 8,400
Focused BUOW burrow&species surveys Osprey
$ 3,600
NEPSSA Osprey
$ 5,800
In Addition to Total
$ 24,200
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S O C I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Hourly Rate Schedule
CLASSIFICATION
Engineers/Project Managers/Planners/Scientists/
Assessment/Special Tax Consultants/Landscape Architects/Designers Principal II
Principal I
Senior III
Senior II
Senior I
Associate I I I
Associate II
Associate I
Assistant V
Assistant IV
Assistant I I I
Assistant II
Assistant I
Survey Services
Rates
$/Hour
290.00
275.00
245.00
235.00
225.00
210.00
195.00
185.00
170.00
155.00
140.00
130.00
95.00 2 -Person Survey Party 291.00
1 -Person Survey Party 201.00
Inspection Services
Construction Manager 245.00
Inspector (Non -Prevailing Wage) 136.00
Inspector Overtime (Non -Prevailing Wage) 185.00
Inspector (Prevailing Wage) 147.00
Inspector Overtime (Prevailing Wage) 195.00
Administrative Services
Project Coordinator 110.00
Administrative Assistant III 99.00
Administrative Assistant II 88.00
Administrative Assistant I 70.00
Other Direct Expenses
Incidental Charges Cost + 15%
Postage Cost
Subcontracted Services Cost + 15%
Special Consultant 355.00
Survey/Inspection Per Diem Prevailing Wage Rate
In -House Delivery Up to 1/2 hour 31.00
In -House Delivery 1/2 Hour up to 1 Hour 62.00
In -House Delivery Over 1 Hour up to 2 Hours 114.00
In -House Delivery Over 2 Hours 165.00
Survey/Inspection Vehicle 0.81/Mile
Mileage 0.72/Mile
Note: All rates are subject to change based on annual inflation and cost of living adjustments. Prevailing wages are dictated by the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). As such, the indicated rate will remain in effect until revised rates are published by the DIR. The rate shown shall be subject to renegotiation to remain in compliance with State requirements if prevailing wages are increased by the DIR.
A FINANCE CHARGE of 1 % % per month (18% per year) will be added to any unpaid amount commencing thirty (30) days from invoice date. A mechanic's lien may be filed for any invoice remaining unpaid after thirty (30) days from invoice date.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
5 The City of Beaumont is seeking a consultant to deliver complete, bid -ready Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for the Brookside Street Improvements, while
successfully coordinating with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and
meeting all applicable City, County, and District standards.
This Project is part of a broader master drainage effort led by RCFC&WCD, and the Brookside improvements
must integrate seamlessly with the Marshall Creek Stage 1 Storm Drain Project, including hydraulic performance, physical tie-in geometry, and RCFC&WCD review and
approval protocols.
Understanding of Services
Brookside Avenue currently functions as an unintended
flood conveyance corridor during storm events, resulting in roadway closures and impaired access during heavy
rains. The City's objective is to convert Brookside from a flood -prone route into a reliable roadway by constructing a channel along the south side of Brookside Avenue that captures flows and ties into downstream facilities, while also improving roadway grades, elevations, and pavement section design.
WEBB understands that this Project is not a single -
discipline drainage design effort; it is a coordinated, multi - agency infrastructure program requiring integrated delivery of the following interdependent components:
• Drainage Channel Design (RCFC&WCD
Standards): Design an appropriately sized, fully
lined concrete trapezoidal channel on the south
side of Brookside Avenue with access ramps for
maintenance and a compliant interface to Marshall
Creek Stage 1 downstream facilities.
• Roadway Improvements and Flow Transfer:
Redesign Brookside Avenue between Cherry
Avenue and Orchard Heights Avenue to safely
transfer storm flows from the roadway to the new
channel. The design must consider the City's intent
to transition from an inverted crown section to a tilt
section and incorporate appropriate transitions and
collection/conveyance features.
• Intersection and Turn Pocket Improvements:
Deliver street widening and intersection
improvements at Cherry/Brookside, including a
northbound Cherry to eastbound Brookside right -
turn pocket, and provide a right -turn pocket at
Orchard Heights Avenue (eastbound Brookside to
southbound Orchard Heights), considering pole
conflicts and feasible alternatives.
• ADA and Multi -Use Access: Design a new ADA
ramp at the southeast corner of Cherry/Brookside,
and a 20 -foot public access/maintenance road
adjacent to the channel, with driveway approaches
at Cherry and Orchard Heights, per RCFC&WCD
standards.
• Utility Coordination and Relocation Plans:
Identify, pothole as needed, and coordinate
with utility owners for design of relocations and
permitting for affected utilities (including likely
waterline relocation and potential SCE pole
relocations), along with anticipated gas and
communications conflicts.
• Environmental and MSHCP Compliance: Prepare
a No Further Action (NFA) letter for the City's
administrative record to document this project was
evaluated in previous CEQA documents. Prepare
compliance studies for the Western Riverside
County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
for use in obtaining encroachment permits from
RCFC&WCD.
• Progressive Design Submittals: Prepare and
manage 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% plan
submittals for City and RCFC&WCD review,
incorporating Partner Led Project guidance, and
delivering complete PS&E, specifications, and
engineer's cost estimates at required milestones.
Because RCFC&WCD will review each milestone submittal
and the Brookside channel cannot adversely impact
the downstream facility, the controlling success factor is early, continuous hydraulic and design integration
between Brookside and Marshall Creek Stage 1, coupled
with disciplined management of utility conflicts, ROW
constraints, and construction phasing impacts on
residents and access. WEBB's team approach is built
to reduce rework, shorten review cycles, and deliver a
complete, coordinated PS&E package that can be bid with confidence and constructed with fewer change orders.
Participating Firms
WEBB will serve as the prime consultant for this project with the following subconsultants offering support:
• Geocon, Inc. - Geotechnical Analysis
• Underground Solutions, Inc. - Potholing
• Utility Specialists - Dry Utility Consulting
• Osprey Environmetnal Associates, Inc. -
Environmental Consulting
► 1.5 - Monthly Progress Report and Invoice
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
► 1.1 - Meetings and Coordination
Regular, well -planned, and well -executed meetings
are essential for advancing the project and keeping all stakeholders engaged. This begins with a Project Kick-off meeting and continues throughout the life of the project with Monthly Progress Meetings. WEBB will prepare draft agendas for review at least two working days before
each meeting. Meeting minutes and Action Item Lists
will be distributed within three working days of each
meeting. Based on our proposed project schedule, we
have budgeted for 14 Meetings, including the Kick-off
Meeting and Monthly Coordination Meetings, and three
(3) additional coordination meetings, including preparation and attendance at a City Council Meeting to present the project.
► 1.2 - Project Schedule
A preliminary project schedule is included as part of this proposal. This schedule will be augmented and updated
monthly to track the project's overall progress. This will be compared with the baseline schedule and will identify any potential slippage early. This will help keep the project on track by allowing us to schedule the resources needed to complete it and, if required, develop a schedule recovery plan.
► 1.3 - Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Receiving deliverables that are technically accurate and high quality is a non-negotiable expectation that the City rightfully deserves to have. To ensure that this happens, we have designated an independent QA/QC Team for this
project. This team of Senior Level Associates will review and comment on each milestone deliverable throughout
the project. Jeff Hart, PE, has been designated as the
Quality Assurance Officer and will lead the Independent QA/QC Team throughout this project. No formal submittal or job -related correspondence will be submitted without review and documented signoff by Jeff.
► 1.4 - Shared Documents Folder
To facilitate effective communication and project delivery, a shared folder will be set up using either Microsoft
SharePoint or Teams. WEBB will coordinate with the City to establish the file structure for this folder.
A L B E R T
WEBB
WEBB will submit itemized monthly invoices by the 15th of each month for services rendered in the previous month.
Each invoice will include the percentage complete for each task and subconsultant cost and reimbursable expenses
with supporting documentation.
O Deliverables:
0 Meeting Agendas and Minutes
O Action Item Lists
O Monthly Project Schedules
D QA/QC Plan
O Signed QA/QC Review Sheets
O Shared Document Folder
TASK 2 - DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS
► 2.1 - Project Database
Good information leads to good design; to that end, WEBB will gather, review, and compile a database of relevant information to be used for the analysis and design of the project. Included in this database will be previous studies and improvement plans, hydrological soil information for the watershed, and rainfall data. Information obtained from the project investigations (i.e., right-of-way mapping, utility research, pothole data, and geotechnical investigations) will be included in the database.
► 2.2 - Basis of Design Memorandum
A Basis of Design Memorandum will be prepared to
document the items in the Project Database, along with
analysis and design parameters and decisions, to avoid
misunderstandings regarding the project moving forward.
Our experience working with clients and agencies is that these Memorandums are very helpful, ensuring there
is no loss of continuity when staff rotations or transfers inevitably occur.
O Deliverables:
O Project Database (stored in the Shared Document
Folder)
D Basis of Design Memorandum
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
10 A S S OC I AT E S
TASK 3 - INVESTIGATIONS
► 3.1 - Survey and Control
WEBB will verify the survey control and aerial topography that has already been flown for the project alignment
by RCFC&WCD as part of the downstream Marshall
Creek Channel Project. WEBB will supplement the aerial
topography with field shots of critical design points, such as the inverts of the sewer manholes along the project
alignment. Topography will be obtained in the horizontal and vertical datums and at the resolution required by
RCFC&WCD and the City.
► 3.2 - Right -of -Way Base Map
Base Map RCFC&WCD prepared a right-of-way base map
as part of the downstream Marshall Creek Channel Project.
WEBB will verify this linework. The parcel where the
proposed channel will be located is currently owned by the City. As a result, it is anticipated that the entire project will be located within the existing public right-of-way and the dedicated parcel on the south side of Brookside Avenue.
As such, Preliminary Title Reports will not be required to verify the base map.
► 3.3 - Utility Research and Potholing
• Field Review - WEBB will conduct a field review to
identify further utilities and other project constraints to be considered during design.
• USA Dry and Wet Utility Research - WEBB will
utilize USA service to research and identify known
utilities in the project area. Letters will be sent to
each identified agency requesting backup utility
information. All collected utility information will be
indexed.
• Preliminary Utility Base Map - All utility
information will be plotted on a preliminary utility
base map that will be used to verify the storm drain
alignment.
• Recommended Pothole Exhibit - Based on the
first phase of subsurface investigation, the 30%
alignment will be prepared for each facility. WEBB
will identify all utilities that require precise location.
WEBB will collaborate with the City to develop
this exhibit, which will serve as the basis for the
subsurface investigation.
• Subsurface Investigation - Our subsurface
investigation will consist of field locating utilities by both geophysical identification and potholes, and
the horizontal alignment of all known utilities along
the alignment. Vertical depths from the surface will
also be identified through this process. We have
included a budget for 10 potholes, but we will
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
charge the City for the actual number of potholes
needed for the design of this facility.
• Final Utility Base Map (after Subsurface
Investigation) - The Preliminary Utility Base
Map will be updated based on the subsurface
investigation to determine conflicts and to be
shown on the final design plans.
• Technical Memorandum - A technical
memorandum will be prepared to document and
summarize the utility research and potholing task,
and will include utility conflicts, relocations, and
associated costs.
► 3.4 - Geotechnical Investigation
WEBB has teamed with Geocon, Inc. (Geocon), who will
provide geotechnical services for this project. Geocon
and WEBB have teamed on several RCFC&WCD Projects
(including the downstream Marshall Creek Project) and,
as such, know the geotechnical requirements for an
RCFC&WCD design. Based on our review of the project,
we have budgeted for five (5) borings.
► 3.5 - Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis
WEBB will review and verify the hydrology prepared from previous studies, relying heavily on the approved hydrology for Marshall Creek that we prepared by RCFC&WCD.
As needed, WEBB will augment and refine the existing
RCFC&WCD study to obtain design flow rates for this
project. Calculations will be prepared for both the 100 - Year and 10 -Year storm events. Recommended flow rates
and backup hydrology calculations will be summarized
in a Technical Memorandum included as part of the 30%
Submittal.
D Deliverables:
II Survey Control and Right of Way Analysis
Memorandum
Right -of -Way Base Map and Topographic Surface
Utility Research Letters
Utility Base Map
Recommended Pothole Exhibit
Pothole Report
Utility Research
Potholing Technical Memorandum
Geotechnical Report
H&H Technical Memorandum
000000000
TASK 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
As outlined in the RFP, the Brookside Channel and street improvements were outlined in the Sundance Specific Plan
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
11 A S S OC I AT E S
Environmental Impact Report and its 3 Addenda (SCH
89070309). The implementation of the Brookside Channel
and street improvements outlined in the RFP would
be consistent with the original intent of the Sundance
Specific Plan. As a result, no further CEQA analysis would be required. Based on this, our scope of work will be to provide the City with a No Further Action (NFA) letter to place in its administrative file for the project.
However, the original EIR and subsequent Addenda
did not address MSHCP Consistency for the proposed
project. Since the project will require review and approval by RCFC&WCD, the City, as a Permittee to the MSHCP,
will be required to demonstrate to RCFC&WCD that it has complied with the MSHCP requirements. Therefore, we
have included MSHCP compliance studies in our scope of
work so that when the City submits its plans and applies for encroachment permits from RCFC&WCD, there will be
sufficient information for RCFC&WCD, also an MSHCP
Permittee, to make its own CEQA findings and MSHCP
findings (using the City's NFA Letter).
Based on our current understanding of the Project, WEBB will team with Osprey to conduct the following biological services:
► 4.1 - Biological Resource Assessment and MSHCP
Consistency Analysis Report
Osprey will conduct a comprehensive literature review of the project area and its immediate surroundings to identify any previously documented sensitive biological resources.
This review will include analyses of existing environmental databases (e.g., CNPS, WRMSHCP), agency records
(e.g., CNDDB), and relevant biological studies to establish a baseline understanding of potential constraints at the project site. Following the literature review, Osprey will perform a detailed reconnaissance -level field survey on foot within the project study area, encompassing the
project footprint and a 50 -foot buffer. Survey methods will be tailored to maximize the detection of sensitive habitats and species identified in the literature review.
These may include, but are not limited to, burrowing owls, riverine areas, vernal pools, and sensitive plant species.
Observations will be carefully documented, with attention given to habitat conditions, vegetation communities, and any signs of protected wildlife species. Survey methods will be reconnaissance -level only and are not intended to satisfy protocol -level survey requirements unless explicitly stated under subsequent tasks.
Based on the findings, Osprey will prepare an MSHCP
Consistency Analysis Report. This report will include a comprehensive list of species observed within the project footprint, detailed vegetation and land cover descriptions, and mapped exhibits depicting all identified biological resources. The report will provide a clear assessment
A L B E R T
WEBB
of potential environmental constraints and regulatory
considerations relevant to the project. The report will be prepared in accordance with the WRMSHCP standards.
► 4.2 - WRMSHCP Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment
and Report
The proposed project is located within a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(WRMSHCP)-designated burrowing owl survey area. To
ensure compliance with WRMSHCP guidelines, a qualified
Osprey biologist will conduct a burrowing owl habitat
assessment following the WRMSHCP Burrowing Owl
Survey Instructions (2006). This assessment will involve a systematic pedestrian survey of the project site to identify potential burrowing owl habitat, including natural burrows and suitable man-made structures. If suitable habitat is identified, Osprey will expand the survey to include the project site and a 150 -meter (approximately 500 -foot) buffer around the project boundary in suitable habitat.
The presence of suitable habitat will trigger the need for a focused burrow survey (Task T3) to evaluate potential burrowing owl activity further. If no suitable habitat is found, no additional surveys will be required, and Osprey will prepare a habitat assessment report summarizing the findings, including site photographs, survey methodology, and a project location map.
Optional tasks for Focused Burrow Surveys and Report,
Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and Report, and Narrow
Endemic Plant Species Survey(s) and Report have been
included in Task 7.
TASK 5 - FINAL DESIGN AND CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS
The overall objective of this project is to prepare Plans, Specifications, and Estimates that the City can use to bid and construct the project. It is anticipated that there will be 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% Submittals to allow for review
and collaboration during the project's design.
► 5.1 - 30% Submittal Package
A 30% Plan Set will be developed in accordance with the City and RCFC&WCD Design and Drafting Standards. The
30% design will establish the permanent and temporary
construction easements that are required for this project.
The Channel Plan will show the plan, profile, and sections of the channel along with proposed lateral connections
in plan view. The street plan will show a plan view of the proposed street, including the ADA Ramp at the southeast corner of Brookside Avenue and Cherry Avenue, a new
right -turn pocket from northbound Cherry Avenue to
Eastbound Brookside Avenue, and an eastbound right -
turn pocket to southbound Orchard Heights. Based upon
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
12 A S S OC I AT E S
the channel and road alignment a conceptual trail and
landscape plan will also be prepared. The Hydrology
Technical Memorandum prepared in Task 3 will be included with the 30% submittal.
Engineer's Estimate - Material quantities will be
calculated from the 30% Plan. A preliminary Engineer's
Estimate will be prepared from these initial quantities using RCFC&WCD's Planning Cost Spreadsheets.
30% QA/QC - Before the 30% submittal to the City,
WEBB will conduct a QA/QC review by our designated
Independent Engineering & Drafting QC Taskforce,
which is not involved in the design and production of
the improvement plans. WEBB will submit copies of our
internal review comments to the City as part of the 30% Field Walk - Following the 30% Submittal, WEBB will
coordinate a Field Walk along the alignment with City and Flood Control Staff. Taking time to identify constraining conflicts at this stage is an investment that yields great returns in both time and budget through the remainder of the project. WEBB will incorporate all comments from the Field Walk into future submittals.
O Deliverables
0 30% Channel and Street Plans
0 Conceptual Trail and Landscape Plans
2 Engineer's Estimate
0 30% QA/QC
► 5.2 - 60% Submittal Package
WEBB will address all comments from the 30% submittal.
The 60% Submittal will include pothole information,
profiles of all lateral facilities, and a profile and sections on the street improvement plan. Signing and striping plans will also be prepared with the 60% Submittal.
Draft Hydrology and Hydraulics Report - A draft
Hydrology and Hydraulics Report will be included with the 60% Submittal.
Trail/Public Access Plan - The 60% submittal will include details of the materials, plants, and irrigation equipment required for the public access trail/channel maintenance road.
Quantities and Draft Specifications - Quantities will be calculated based on the 60% Plans. Draft Specifications will be prepared for the project using the City's and
RFCF&WCD's boilerplate specifications.
60% QA/QC - Before the 60% submittal to the City,
WEBB will conduct a QA/QC review by our designated
Independent Engineering & Drafting QC Taskforce,
which is not involved in the design and production of
A L B E R T
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
the improvement plans. WEBB will submit copies of our
internal review comments to the City as part of the 60% Deliverables:
0 60% Channel, Trail, and Street Plans
O Conceptual Trail and Landscape Plans
D Draft Hydrology and Hydraulics Report
O Quantities and Draft Specifications
0 60% QA/QC
► 5.3 - 90% Submittal Package
WEBB will address all comments from the 60% submittal
and prepare a comprehensive 90% submittal package.
Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Report - WEBB will
incorporate any comments from the Draft Hydrology and
Hydraulics Report and prepare a Final Hydrology and
Hydraulics Report for submittal with the 90% Plans.
90% Improvement Plans - WEBB will address plan check
comments from the 60% Review.
90% Cost Estimate - Material quantities will be reviewed and updated from the 90% Plans. An updated Engineer's
Estimate will be prepared from these initial quantities using unit costs from WEBB's Construction Database.
90% Draft SWPPP - WEBB anticipates this will be a Type
1 Project as defined by the Construction General Permit.
A 90% Draft SWPPP will be prepared for the selected
contractor to use in preparing a project bid. The contractor will finalize and implement the SWPPP during construction.
Draft Traffic Control Plans - The temporary traffic control plans will provide traffic control equipment layouts, phased construction work areas, and detour plans to cover the
proposed Project improvements. All efforts will be made to prioritize construction zone safety while maintaining traffic in the area. The temporary traffic control plans will conform to CA MUTCD standards.
Erosion Control Plan - WEBB will prepare an Erosion
Control Plan along with the 90% SWPPP.
90% Specifications - WEBB will prepare 90%
Specifications based on comments from the 60% review
and any additions made during the 90% Submittal
Process.
90% QA/QC - Before the 90% submittal to the City,
WEBB will conduct a QA/QC review from our designated
Independent Engineering and Drafting QC Taskforce
that is not involved in the design and production of the improvement plans. WEBB will submit copies of our
internal review comments to the City as part of the 90% submittal.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
13 D Deliverables:
An optional task for Additional Utility Relocation
Coordination has been included in Task 7.
00000000
Final Hydrology and Hydraulics Report
90% Design Plans
90% Quantities and Estimate
90% Draft SWPPP
Draft Traffic Control Plans
Erosion Control Plan
90% Specifications
90% QA/QC
► 5.4 - 100% Submittal Package
The final submittal will address all plan check comments from the 90% submittal. Included with this submittal will be the final technical specifications, final bid quantities, and final Engineer's Estimate. Mylar plans (or Digital Equivalent) will be delivered to the City and other agencies for final signatures.
O Deliverables:
EI 100% Design Plans
RI 100% Quantities and Estimate
I1 100% Specifications
RI Final Traffic Control Plans
EI Signed Mylars
An optional task for Plat and Legal has been included in Task 7.
TASK 6 - UTILITY RELOCATION COORDINATION
Conflicts with several existing utilities are anticipated due to the proposed roadway and drainage improvements.
These include a 14" water line owned by Beaumont Cherry Valley Water Company (BCVWC), several power poles
and guys with overhead electrical and telecom, and a gas line. Based on the utility conflicts identified in Task 3.3, WEBB and WEBB's dry utility consultant, Utility Specialists SW Inc., will coordinate with the utility owners to relocate their facilities. It is assumed that the utility owners will prepare the relocation design plans. WEBB will review
the relocation drawings to ensure they are consistent
with the proposed improvements. If needed, WEBB will
provide a separate scope and budget for the design of
utility relocation plans. WEBB will also send copies of the proposed street and storm drain plans to the utility owners identified in Task 3.3 at the 60% and 90% submittal stages to confirm that their facilities are plotted correctly on the plans. Because the actual number of utility conflicts and relocations will not be known until the design progresses, an allowance for Additional Utility Relocation Coordination has been included in the optional scope section.
A L B E R T
WEBB
TASK 7 - OPTIONAL TASKS
► 7.1 - Plats and Legal
Plats and legal descriptions may be required for the City to convey all or a portion of the City -owned property to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District as right-of-way for the channel improvements.
The right-of-way requirements and need for plats and
legals will be coordinated with the District as the project progresses. If required, this task includes preparing two legal descriptions and plats and coordination with County Staff for review, approval, and signature for recordation. ► 7.2 - Additional Utility Relocation Coordination
As stated in Task 6, the actual number of utility conflicts and relocations will not be known until the design
progresses. An allowance for additional utility relocation coordination is included in this section, if needed, as determined by WEBB and the City based on the number of
utility conflicts and relocations identified.
► 7.3 - Focused Burrow Surveys and Report (If needed)
If the habitat assessment (Task 4.2) confirms the presence of suitable burrowing owl habitat within the project
site, Osprey will conduct a focused burrow survey in
accordance with WRMSHCP guidelines. This survey will
systematically evaluate the project site and a 150 -meter (approximately 500 -foot) buffer to identify suitable natural burrows and man-made structures that could support
burrowing owls. Pedestrian transects will be spaced no
more than 30 meters (100 feet) apart to ensure complete ground coverage. Transect spacing will be adjusted as
needed based on terrain, vegetation density, and ground visibility. During the survey, Osprey will document the GPS coordinates of all potential burrows, owl sign, and any observed owls. Survey conclusions will be based on site access available at the time of survey; access restrictions outside the project footprint may limit survey coverage and will be documented accordingly. If suitable burrows or burrowing owls are detected, additional focused
burrowing owl surveys will be required in accordance with WRMSHCP protocols (Task 7.4). If no potential burrows
or owls are found, no further surveys will be necessary, and Osprey will prepare a detailed report summarizing the findings, including site photographs, survey methodology, and mapped transect locations.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
14 A S S OC I AT E S
► 7.4 - Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and Report (If
needed)
If suitable burrowing owl burrows are identified during the focused burrow survey (Task 7.3), Osprey will conduct
focused burrowing owl surveys over four separate days,
with the initial survey occurring concurrently with the focused burrow survey. Upon arrival, an Osprey biologist will use binoculars and spotting scopes to scan the site and the adjacent 150 -meter (500 -foot) buffer for owls, burrows, and owl sign, particularly in areas with limited access. Surveyors will then walk the project site and
buffer area in pedestrian transects, spaced no more than 30 meters (100 feet) apart, ensuring complete ground
coverage while adjusting for terrain and vegetation density.
This will be done while minimizing disturbance near any occupied burrows. If access to adjacent areas is restricted, surveys will be conducted from a distance using binoculars and spotting scopes. Upon completion of the surveys,
a final report will be submitted to CASC. The report will detail the survey methodology, transect width, duration, conditions, and results. Additionally, the report will include maps highlighting the locations of identified burrows. If no owls are observed, no further surveys will be required until 30 days before grading, at which point a preconstruction survey will be required.
► 7.5 - Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey(s) and
Report (If needed)
The project is located in a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area for Marvin's onion and Many -stemmed
Dudleya. If the initial habitat assessment outlined in Task
4.1 determines that suitable habitat for these plant species is present within the project site, Osprey will conduct protocol -level surveys for these species, as required
under the MSHCP, during their appropriate flowering
periods. Surveys will be conducted in suitable habitat
areas in accordance with the guidelines of the California Native Plant Society and the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Osprey estimates that up to
three field days with one senior biologist will be needed to complete the surveys. Surveys are seasonally constrained and dependent on appropriate phenological conditions.
If surveys cannot be completed during the applicable
blooming period, they may be deferred to the next suitable survey window.
After completing the field surveys, Osprey will prepare a letter report documenting the survey results. The report will include a detailed site description, survey methodology, and findings, noting any areas occupied by sensitive
plant species and, if applicable, providing an estimate of the affected acreage. If necessary, the report will include mitigation recommendations for potential impacts to
sensitive plant species observed on the project site.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
Assumptions
The following general assumptions are made relative to
this scope and cost:
1. Osprey will provide up to two rounds of revisions
to all reports described in this proposal to address
any comments received. If additional revisions
are required, a separate scope and fee may be
required.
2. Protocol -level surveys, agency coordination,
permitting support, mitigation planning,
construction monitoring, or regulatory approvals are
not included unless explicitly stated in the scope of
services.
3. Focused surveys (Tasks 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5) are
conditional and will only be initiated upon written
authorization from the Client.
4. A MSHCP 30 -Day Preconstruction Survey is not
included in the scope of services. If required, a
separate scope and fee will be required.
5. Surveys requiring specific seasonal timing (e.g.,
narrow endemic plant surveys) are subject to
appropriate phenological conditions. If conditions
are unsuitable, surveys may need to be postponed
to the next appropriate survey window.
6. This proposal assumes that accurate, up-to-date
project plans will be provided before fieldwork.
Significant changes to project design or limits of
disturbance may require revisions to scope and
cost.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
15 Critical Issues and Solutions
Coordination with RCFC&WCD
RCFC&WCD has very particular and unbending standards.
Since they will ultimately accept this project for operation and maintenance, all aspects must meet their standards.
Each step of the process (design, environmental
documentation and permitting, and construction
inspection) must follow a prescribed process.
The WEBB Team assembled for this project has
successfully navigated projects (both City -Sponsored
and Developer -Sponsored) time and time again. Our
team has a combined relationship of over 65 years with
RCFC&WCD. Our proven track record will ensure your
project receives RCFC&WCD approval in the most efficient manner possible.
Especially critical to this project is the inclusion of a shared Public Access Trial/Maintenance Road. Our
experience designing and processing similar projects
through RCFC&WCD will benefit the City. We know the
decision makers at RCFC&WCD and understand the ideal
time to engage them throughout the design process.
We are currently working with the District to design the downstream segment, which will streamline project
coordination and provide us with greater insight into the project.
Traffic Control and Impacts to Local
Residents
The reconstruction of Brookside Avenue will, unfortunately, cause some disruption to traffic and residents. To the
extent that the project can be designed and construction sequenced to minimize disruptions, the fewer complaints City Staff will have to field. The roadway needs to be
configured to direct cross street drainage to the proposed channel. Additionally, continuous access must be provided to the residences along the alignment. WEBB has assigned Nicholas Lowe (Nick), PE, TE, the Deputy Director of our Traffic and Transportation Department, to oversee the
preparation and coordination of the roadway design and
the traffic control plan for this project with the City.
Nick's experience working for both public agencies and
private engineering firms is a significant advantage for this project. Nick's knowledge of procedures and protocols
will ensure this project is constructed in a manner that
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
minimizes impacts on residents. We will initially meet with the City to coordinate design constraints, construction phasing, and accessibility. Because this is so critical, it is essential that traffic control and construction sequencing be developed as part of the plan set, rather than left to the contractor. This will help secure consistent bids from various contractors and avoid misunderstandings about
how construction will be phased, and accessibility will be maintained.
Scope Management and Cost Control
Controlling costs and staying on schedule are critical
components of every project. By managing the scope of
work and budget, it is easier to control the schedule and deliver a project on time and within budget. WEBB will do this through earned value tracking that can be linked to the project schedule.
Using the detailed person -hour estimate and project
schedule, the monthly revenue for each task can be
developed and tracked. This information is critical to
the project, as it helps analyze where specific tasks
are ahead or behind schedule relative to the original
schedule. This system can also be used to project trends that indicate when a particular task is likely to exceed budget. This can be used to determine whether a task's
effort is out of scope, so these issues can be resolved before they become problems. We have budgeted for up
to 15 progress and coordination meetings with the City, RCFC&WCD, and one (1) board meeting.
Deliverables and Design
Approach
Based upon our experience with similar projects, we
anticipate the following plans and sheets to be prepared for this project:
Channel Improvement Plans:
• Cover Sheet (1 sheet)
• Plan and Profile (2-3 sheets Assuming 1 "=50'
District Standard)
• Lateral Connections and Catch Basins (4-6 sheets)
• Details (7-10 sheet)
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
16 Street Improvement/Traffic Control Plans:
• Cover Sheet (1 sheet)
• Plan and Profile (2-11 sheets)
• Details (12-15 sheets)
Erosion Control Plans:
• Cover Sheet (1 sheet)
• Construction BMP Plans (2-3 sheets)
• BMP Details (4-5 sheets)
Design activities will commence with detailed utility
research, aerial topography, and surveyed alignment
bases, complemented by geotechnical analysis. The 30%
design plans will establish the alignment and profile of the storm drain and basin grading, identify potential utility conflicts, and recommend subsurface investigations. As
design progresses, specifications, traffic control plans, and structural details will be developed.
Preparation of Plats and Legals has been included as an optional task in Task 7.
Quality Assurance and
Quality Control
Throughout the project, quality assurance and quality
control will be prioritized. An independent QA/QC team, led by Jeff Hart, PE, will review all milestone deliverables to ensure technical accuracy and high quality. Monthly
progress reports will summarize activities, highlight
upcoming tasks, and address critical issues to maintain project momentum.
Our comprehensive approach ensures the design meets
the County's needs, addresses existing deficiencies, and supports future development within the project area.
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
A S S OC I AT E S
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Project Schedule
ID
Task Name
Duration
Start
Finish
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3r
Jan Mar May
Jul Sep Nov
Jan Mar May
1 Notice to Proceed/Contract Award 0 days Tue 4/7/26 Tue 4/7/26 4/7
2 3
Project Management 280 days Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
Work Plan, QA/QC Plan, Schedule 9 days Tue 4/7/26 Fri 4/17/26 WEBB
"r,
City,RCFC,WEBB
City,RCFC,WEBB
4 5
Kickoff Meeting 1 wk Mon 4/20/2E Fri 4/24/26
6 Monthly Progress Meetings 14 mons
Additional Coordination Meetings and 14 mons
City Council Meeting (Dates TBD)
Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
City,RCFC,WEBB
7 8
Progress Reports and Schedule Updates 14 mons
Tue 4/7/26 Mon 5/3/27
W
WEBB
9 10
Data Gathering and Analysis 110 days
Mon 4/27/2(Fri 9/25/26
I
11 Project database (gather, review, 4 wks
compile)
Mon Fri 5/22/26
4/27/26
B
WEBB
ir
+4 7/3
12 Draft Basis of Design Memorandum 2 wks Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/19/26 .,1WEBB 13 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 6/22/2E Fri 7/3/26 14 Submit Draft Memo (w/concept exhibit) 0 days Fri 7/3/26 Fri 7/3/26 15 Final Basis of Design Memorandum 2 wks Mon 7/20/2E Fri 7/31/26 .WEBS
,BB
-N 8/28
019/25
16 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 8/3/26 Fri 8/14/26 17 Submit Final Memo (w/30% plans) 0 days Fri 8/28/26 Fri 8/28/26 18 Agency Approval 0 days Fri 9/25/26 Fri 9/25/26
19 20
Survey and Control and Right of Way Base 190 days
Map
Mon Fri 1/15/27
4/27/26
1 I
21 Aerial and Field Topography and Base 4 wks
Map
Mon Fri 5/22/26
4/27/26
-UlIEBB
B
WEBB
WEBB
22 Right of Way Base Mapping 4 wks Mon 4/27/2E Fri 5/22/26 23 Draft Technical Memorandum 2 wks Mon 5/25/2E Fri 6/5/26 24 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 6/8/26 Fri 6/19/26 Submit Draft Memo (w/30% plans) 0 days Fri 8/28/26 Fri 8/28/26 4 8/28
WEBB
'• WEBB
25 26
Final Technical Memorandum 2 wks Mon 9/28/2E Fri 10/9/26 27 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 10/12/2 Fri 10/23/26 1/15
28 Submit Final Memo (w/60% plans) 0 days Fri 12/18/26 Fri 12/18/26 29 Agency Approval 0 days Fri 1/15/27 Fri 1/15/27
30 31
Utility Research and Potholing 240 days Mon 4/27/2(Fri 3/26/27 32 Utility Research 4 wks Mon 4/27/2E Fri 5/22/26
- +mi,-WEBB
�l
_
EBB
WEBB
Underground
Solutions
33 Field Review/Site Visit 1 wk Mon 5/25/2E Fri 5/29/26 34 Preliminary Utility Base Map 1 wk Mon 6/1/26 Fri 6/5/26 35 Pothole Exhibit 1 wk Mon 8/17/2E Fri 8/21/26
36 Subsurface Investigation - potholing 4 wks Mon 9/28/2E Fri 10/23/26
4.,.,, WEBB
WEBB
WEBB
*, 12/18
,_,,WEBB
WEBB
H 2/26
o13/26
37 Final Utility Base Map 2 wks Mon 10/26/2 Fri 11/6/26 Draft Technical Memorandum 1 wk Mon 11/30/2 Fri 12/4/26 38 39
QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 12/7/2E Fri 12/18/26 40 Submit Draft Memo (with 60% plans) 0 days Fri 12/18/26 Fri 12/18/26 41 Final Technical Memorandum 2 wks Mon 2/1/27 Fri 2/12/27 42 QA/QC and Address QA/QC comments 2 wks Mon 2/15/27 Fri 2/26/27 43 Submit Final Memo (w/90% plans) 0 days Fri 2/26/27 Fri 2/26/27 44 Agency Approval 0 days Fri 3/26/27 Fri 3/26/27
45 46
Geotechnical Investigation 40 days Mon 4/27/2E Fri 6/19/26
A L B E R T
A.
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A S S O C I AT E S
ID
Task Name
Duration
Start
Finish
1st Quarter l 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
Jan Mar May
Jul
Se')
Nov
Jan Mar May
Jul
47 Geotechnical Investigation and Report 8 wks Mon 4/2712E Fri 6/19/26
48 49
Environmental Services 240 days Mon 8/3/26
Fri 7/2/27
I
_iwfii
WEBB
_f
50 CEQA NFA Letter 2 wks Mon 8/3/26
Fri 8/14/26
51 MSHCP Consistancy Report 3 mons Mon 8/3/26
BUOW Report 3 mons Mon 8/3/26
Fri 10/23/26
.I.
a,___
Fri 10/23/26
52 53
Optional Focused BUOW Burrowing and
Species Surveys
5 mons
Mon
2/15/27
Fri 7/2/27
54 Optional - NEPSSA
5 mons
Mon 2/15/27
Fri 7/2/27
Clity,RCFC
.�
v
55 56
30% Submittal
Hydrology Analysis and Technical Memo
80 days
4 wks
Mon 6/8/26
Mon 6/8/26
Fri 9/25/26
Fri 7/3/26
iiimmini
-
57 WEBB
WEBS
..--. 7/3
C
City,RCFC
c
{WE
48/28
BB
WEBB
58 Street and Storm Drain Concept Exhibits
4 wks
Mon 6/8/26
Fri 7/3/26
Fri 7/3/26
Fri 7/17/26
59 Submit Concept Exhibits
Concept Exhibits - Agency
Review/Approval
0 days
2 wks
Fri 7/3/26
Mon 7/6/26
60 61
30% Storm Drain Plan and Cost Estimate
30% QA/QC and Address QA/QC
comments
4 wks
2 wks
Mon 7/20/2E
Mon
8/17/26
Fri 8/14/26
Fri 8/28/26
62 Fri 8/28/26
63 30% Submittal
0 days
Fri 8/28/26
64 Agency Review
4 wks
Mon 8/31/2€
Fri 9/25/26
Tswi..all
65 66
60% Submittal
60 days
Mon 10/26/1
Fri 1/15/27
i
67 Final H&H anaylsis and Draft Drainage
Report
6 wks
Mon
10/26/26
Fri 12/4/26
WEBB
..,....
68 60% Plans, Cost Estimate, and Draft
Specifications
6 wks
Mon
10/26/26
Fri 12/4/26
WEBB
Tiit7rWEBB
--.12/18
yam,-City,RCFC
60% QA/QA and Address QA/QC
Comments
60% Submittal
2 wks
0 days
Mon
12/7/26
Fri 12/18/26
Fri 12/18/26
Fri 12/18/26
69 70
71 Agency Review
4 wks
Mon 12/21/2
Fri 1/15/27
72 73
90% Submittal
50 days
Mon 1/18/21
Fri 3/26/27
I
I
-WEBB
WEBB
74 Final Drainage Report
4 wks
Mon 1/18/27
Fri 2/12/27
Fri 2/12/27
75 90% Plans, Estimate, Specifications, and
strucural calculations
4 wks
Mon
1/18/27
,,w-
WEBB
._
4-/26
WEBB
_ _.,,_City,RCFC
76 Draft SWPPP and Erosion Control Plans
90% QA/QA and Address QA/QC
Comments
4 wks
2 wks
Mon 1/18/27
Mon
2/15/27
Fri 2/12/27
77 Fri 2/26/27
Fri 2/26/27
Fri 3/26/27
78 90% Submittal
Agency Review
0 days
4 wks
Fri 2/26/27
Mon 3/1/27
79 80
81 100% Submittal
60 days
Mon 3/29/21
Fri 6/18/27
I
' -WEBB
m_
WEBB
L-WEBB
i
4/23
82 Final Signed Drainage report, plans,
special provisions, and estimate
2 wks
Mon
3/29/27
Fri 4/9/27
Fri 4/9/27
Fri 4/23/27
83 Final Draft SWPPP & Erosion Control Plan
Final QA/QC and Address QA/QC
comments
2 wks
2 wks
Mon 3/29/27
Mon
4/12/27
84 Fri 4/23/27
85 Final Submittal 0 days Fri 4/23/27
86 Agency Signatures/Approval 8 wks Mon 4/26/27
Fri 6/18/27
1.....". City,RCFC
89 Utility Relocation Coordination 10 mons Mon 9/28/2E
Fri 7/2/27
WEBB,City
N
2/18
.4-2/26
90 60% Utility Notice 0 days Fri 12/18/26
90% Utility Notice 0 days Fri 2/26/27
Fri 12/18/26
Fri 2/26/27
91 A L B E R T
WEBB
CITY OF BEAUMONT
R-26-08 BROOKSIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ASSOCIATES
C26-26
EXHIBIT "B"
CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
ALBEAWE-01
VSUNGA
,
,acoRO CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
kta.....---'
DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
4/2/2026
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER License # 0757776
HUB International Insurance Services Inc.
PO Box 5345
Riverside, CA 92517
CONTACT Karen Rosati
NAME:
PHO
(A/C, No, Ext): (951) 779-8543 FAX
(AAc, No):(951) 231-2572
ADDRESS: [email protected]
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURER A:Travelers Property Casualty Company of America 25674
INSURED
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
INSURER B : Lexington Insurance Company
19437
INSURER C :
INSURER D :
INSURER E :
INSURER F :
COVERAGES
CERTIFICATE NUMBER:
REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLIC ES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
ADDL
INSD
SUBR
WVD
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFF
(MM/DD/YYYY)
POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)
LIMITS
A
X
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
X
X
P-630-8W805292-TIL-25
9/1/2025
9/1/2026
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 1,000,000
CLAIMS -MADE IX OCCUR
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
MED EXP (Any one person)
300,000
$
_$ 5,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$ 1,000,000
GEN'L
AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES
POLICY JECT I X PRO- LOC
OTHER:
PER:
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 2,000,000
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$ 2,000,000
$
A
AUTOMOBILE
X
X
LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
OWNED
_
X
SCHEDULED
AUTOS
NON -OWNED
AUTOS ONLY
X
BA-9T94622A-25-43-G
9/1/2025
9/1/2026
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
1,000,000
$
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
$
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
$
PROPERTY DAMAGE
Per accident)
$
$
A
X
UMBRELLA LIAB
EXCESS LIAB
X
OCCUR
CLAIMS -MADE
CUP -9T948494-25-43
9/1/2025
911/2026
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 2,000,000
AGGREGATE
$ 2,000,000
DED I X RETENTION $ 0
$
A WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y/ N
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? Y
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
N /A
X
UB-4J648178-25-43-G
9/1/2025
9/1/2026
X PER OTH-
STATUTE i I ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$ 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$ 1'000'000
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
1,000,000
$
B
Professional Liab.
031711122
9/1/2025
9/1/2026
Ded $150k/EaClaim 2M
2,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: Brookside Channel and Street Project
The City of Beaumont, its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents and volunteers are Additional Insured with regard to the General Liability policy per the attached endorsement form CGD414 04/08. Waiver of Subrogation applies with regard to the General Liability policy per the attached endorsement form CGD379 02/19. Waiver of Subrogation applies with regard to the Auto Liability policy per the attached endorsement form CAT353 02/15. Waiver of Subrogation applies with regard to the Workers' Compensation policy per the attached endorsement form WC990376A.
Should the policies be cancelled before the expiration date, Hub International Insurance Services Inc. (Hub), independent of any rights which may be afforded SEE ATTACHED ACORD 101
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
P��e 541 of g� © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
The ACORD name an ogo are registers marks of ACORD
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: ALBEAWE-01
VSUNGA
/ 1
ACORL7
LOC #: 0
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE
AGENCY License # 0757776
HUB International Insurance Services Inc.
NAMED INSURED
A. Associates
cCray Street
3788 Alb8rt McCray
Riverside, CA 92506
POLICY NUMBER
SEE PAGE 1
CARRIER
SEE PAGE 1
NAIC CODE
SEE P 1
EFFECTIVE DATE: SEE PAGE 1
ADDITIONAL REMARKS
THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance Description of Operations/Locations/Vehicles:
within the policies to the certificate holder named below, will provide to such certificate holder notice of such cancellation within thirty (30) days of the cancellation date, except in the event the cancellation is due to non-payment of premium, in which case Hub will provide to such certificate holder notice of such cancellation within ten (10) days of the cancellation date ACORD 101 (2008/01)
© 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
The ACORD name }yg J, doom telrodl ®arks of ACORD
Albert A. Webb Associates
Policy Number: P-630-8W805292-TIL-25
POLICY TERM: 9/1/2025 - 9/1/2026
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED - WRITTEN
CONTRACTS (ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS)
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
1. The following is added to SECTION II - WHO IS
AN INSURED:
Any person or organization that you agree in a
"written contract requiring insurance" to include as
an additional insured on this Coverage Part, but:
a. Only with respect to liability for "bodily injury",
"property damage" or "personal injury"; and
b. If, and only to the extent that, the injury or
damage is caused by acts or omissions of
you or your subcontractor in the performance
of "your work" to which the "written contract
requiring insurance" applies. The person or
organization does not qualify as an additional
insured with respect to the independent acts
or omissions of such person or organization.
The insurance provided to such additional insured
is limited as follows:
c. In the event that the Limits of Insurance of
this Coverage Part shown in the Declarations
exceed the limits of liability required by the
"written contract requiring insurance", the in-
surance provided to the additional insured
shall be limited to the limits of liability required
by that "written contract requiring insurance".
This endorsement shall not increase the limits
of insurance described in Section III — Limits
Of Insurance.
d. This insurance does not apply to the render-
ing of or failure to render any "professional
services" or construction management errors
or omissions.
e. This insurance does not apply to "bodily in-
jury" or "property damage" caused by "your
work" and included in the "products -
completed operations hazard" unless the
"written contract requiring insurance" specifi-
cally requires you to provide such coverage
for that additional insured, and then the insur-
ance provided to the additional insured ap-
plies only to such "bodily injury" or "property
damage" that occurs before the end of the pe-
riod of time for which the "written contract re-
quiring insurance" requires you to provide
such coverage or the end of the policy period,
whichever is earlier.
2. The following is added to Paragraph 4.a. of SEC-
TION IV - COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CONDITIONS:
The insurance provided to the additional insured
is excess over any valid and collectible "other in-
surance", whether primary, excess, contingent or
on any other basis, that is available to the addi-
tional insured for a loss we cover. However, if you
specifically agree in the "written contract requiring
insurance" that this insurance provided to the ad-
ditional insured under this Coverage Part must
apply on a primary basis or a primary and non-
contributory basis, this insurance is primary to
"other insurance" available to the additional in-
sured which covers that person or organization as
a named insured for such loss, and we will not
share with that "other insurance". But this insur-
ance provided to the additional insured still is ex-
cess over any valid and collectible "other insur-
ance", whether primary, excess, contingent or on
any other basis, that is available to the additional
insured when that person or organization is an
additional insured under any "other insurance".
3. The following is added to SECTION IV - COM-
MERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS:
Duties Of An Additional Insured
As a condition of coverage provided to the addi-
tional insured:
a. The additional insured must give us written
notice as soon as practicable of an "occur-
rence" or an offense which may result in a
claim. To the extent possible, such notice
should include:
CG D4 14 04 08
Q 2008 The Travelers Companies, Inc.
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
i. How, when and where the "occurrence"
or offense took place;
ii. The names and addresses of any injured
persons and witnesses; and
iii. The nature and location of any injury or
damage arising out of the "occurrence" or
offense.
b. If a claim is made or "suit" is brought against
the additional insured, the additional insured
must:
i. Immediately record the specifics of the
claim or "suit" and the date received; and
ii. Notify us as soon as practicable.
The additional insured must see to it that we
receive written notice of the claim or "suit" as
soon as practicable.
c. The additional insured must immediately send
us copies of all legal papers received in con-
nection with the claim or "suit", cooperate with
us in the investigation or settlement of the
claim or defense against the "suit", and oth-
erwise comply with all policy conditions.
d. The additional insured must tender the de-
fense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to
any provider of other insurance which would
cover the additional insured for a loss we
cover. However, this condition does not affect
whether this insurance provided to the addi-
tional insured is primary to that other insur-
ance available to the additional insured which
covers that person or organization as a
named insured.
4. The following is added to the DEFINITIONS Sec-
tion:
'Written contract requiring insurance" means that
part of any written contract or agreement under
which you are required to include a person or or-
ganization as an additional insured on this Cover-
age Part, provided that the "bodily injury" and
"property damage" occurs and the "personal in-
jury" is caused by an offense committed:
a. After the signing and execution of the contract
or agreement by you;
b. While that part of the contract or agreement is
in effect; and
c. Before the end of the policy period.
Q 2008 The Travelers Companies, Inc.
CG D4 14 04 08
Albert A. Webb Associates
Policy Number: P-630-8W805292-TIL-25
POLICY TERM: 9/1/2025 - 9/1/2026
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
XTEND ENDORSEMENT FOR ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS
AND SURVEYORS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF COVERAGE — This endorsement broadens coverage. However, coverage for any injury, damage or medical expenses described in any of the provisions of this endorsement may be excluded or limited by another endorsement to this Coverage Part, and these coverage broadening provisions do not apply to the extent that coverage is excluded or limited by such an endorsement. The following listing is a general coverage description only. Read all the provisions of this endorsement and the rest of your policy carefully to determine rights, duties, and what is and is not covered.
A. Non -Owned Watercraft — 75 Feet Long Or Less
B. Who Is An Insured — Unnamed Subsidiaries
C. Who Is An Insured — Retired Partners, Members,
Directors And Employees
D. Who Is An Insured — Employees And Volunteer
Workers — Bodily Injury To Co -Employees, Co -
Volunteer Workers And Retired Partners,
Members, Directors And Employees
E. Who Is An Insured — Newly Acquired Or Formed
Limited Liability Companies
F. Blanket Additional Insured — Controlling Interest
G. Blanket Additional Insured — Mortgagees,
Assignees, Successors Or Receivers
PROVISIONS
A. NON -OWNED WATERCRAFT - 75 FEET
LONG OR LESS
1. The following replaces Paragraph (2) of
Exclusion g., Aircraft, Auto Or Watercraft,
in Paragraph 2. of SECTION I -
COVERAGES — COVERAGE A — BODILY
INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE
LIABILITY:
(2) A watercraft you do not own that is:
(a) 75 feet long or less; and
(b) Not being used to carry any person
or property for a charge;
2. The following replaces Paragraph 2.e. of
SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED:
e. Any person or organization that, with
your express or implied consent, either
H. Blanket Additional Insured — Governmental
Entities — Permits Or Authorizations Relating To
Premises
I. Blanket Additional Insured — Governmental
Entities — Permits Or Authorizations Relating To
Operations
J. Incidental Medical Malpractice
K. Medical Payments — Increased Limit
L. Amendment Of Excess Insurance Condition —
Professional Liability
M. Blanket Waiver Of Subrogation — When Required
By Written Contract Or Agreement
N. Contractual Liability — Railroads
uses or is responsible for the use of a
watercraft that you do not own that is:
(1) 75 feet long or less; and
(2) Not being used to carry any person
or property for a charge;
B. WHO IS AN INSURED - UNNAMED
SUBSIDIARIES
The following is added to SECTION II - WHO IS
AN INSURED:
Any of your subsidiaries, other than a partnership
or joint venture, that is not shown as a Named
Insured in the Declarations is a Named Insured
if:
a. You are the sole owner of, or maintain an
ownership interest of more than 50% in, such
subsidiary on the first day of the policy
period; and
CG D3 79 02 19
© 2017 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
b. Such subsidiary is not an insured under
similar other insurance.
No such subsidiary is an insured for "bodily
injury" or "property damage" that occurred, or
"personal and advertising injury" caused by an
offense committed:
a. Before you maintained an ownership interest
of more than 50% in such subsidiary; or
b. After the date, if any, during the policy period
that you no longer maintain an ownership
interest of more than 50% in such subsidiary.
For purposes of Paragraph 1. of Section II — Who
Is An Insured, each such subsidiary will be
deemed to be designated in the Declarations as:
a. A limited liability company;
b. An organization other than a partnership,
joint venture or limited liability company; or
c. A trust;
as indicated in its name or the documents that
govern its structure.
C. WHO IS AN INSURED - RETIRED PARTNERS,
MEMBERS, DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES
The following is added to Paragraph 2. of
SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED:
Any person who is your retired partner, member,
director or "employee" that is performing services
for you under your direct supervision, but only for
acts within the scope of their employment by you
or while performing duties related to the conduct
of your business. However, no such retired
partner, member, director or "employee" is an
insured for:
(1) "Bodily injury":
(a) To you, to your current partners or
members (if you are a partnership or
joint venture), to your current members
(if you are a limited liability company) or
to your current directors;
(b) To the spouse, child, parent, brother or
sister of that current partner, member or
director as a consequence of Paragraph
(1)(a) above;
(c) For which there is any obligation to
share damages with or repay someone
else who must pay damages because of
the injury described in Paragraph (1)(a)
or (b) above; or
(d) Arising out of his or her providing or
failing to provide professional health care
services.
Unless you are in the business or occupation
of providing professional health care
services, Paragraphs (1)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
above do not apply to "bodily injury" arising
out of providing or failing to provide first aid
or "Good Samaritan services" by any of your
retired partners, members, directors or
"employees", other than a doctor. Any such
retired partners, members, directors or
"employees" providing or failing to provide
first aid or "Good Samaritan services" during
their work hours for you will be deemed to be
acting within the scope of their employment
by you or performing duties related to the
conduct of your business.
(2) "Personal injury":
(a) To you, to your current or retired
partners or members (if you are a
partnership or joint venture), to your
current or retired members (if you are a
limited liability company), to your other
current or retired directors or
"employees" while in the course of his or
her employment or performing duties
related to the conduct of your business,
or to your other "volunteer workers"
while performing duties related to the
conduct of your business;
(b) To the spouse, child, parent, brother or
sister of that current or retired partner,
member, director, "employee" or
"volunteer worker" as a consequence of
Paragraph (2)(a) above;
(c) For which there is any obligation to
share damages with or repay someone
else who must pay damages because of
the injury described in Paragraph (2)(a)
or (b) above; or
(d) Arising out of his or her providing or
failing to provide professional health care
services.
(3) "Property damage" to property:
(a) Owned, occupied or used by; or
(b) Rented to, in the care, custody or control
of, or over which physical control is
being exercised for any purpose by;
you, any of your retired partners, members
or directors, your current or retired
"employees" or "volunteer workers", any
current partner or member (if you are a
partnership or joint venture), or any current
member (if you are a limited liability
company) or current director.
© 2017 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. CG D3 79 02 19 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
D. WHO IS AN INSURED - EMPLOYEES AND
VOLUNTEER WORKERS - BODILY INJURY
TO CO -EMPLOYEES, CO -VOLUNTEER
WORKERS AND RETIRED PARTNERS,
MEMBERS, DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES
The following is added to Paragraph 2.a.(1) of
SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED:
Paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c) above do not
apply to "bodily injury" to a current or retired co -
"employee" while in the course of the co -
"employee's" employment by you or performing
duties related to the conduct of your business, or
to "bodily injury" to your other "volunteer
workers" or retired partners, members or
directors while performing duties related to the
conduct of your business.
E. WHO IS AN INSURED - NEWLY ACQUIRED
OR FORMED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
The following replaces Paragraph 3. of
SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED:
3. Any organization you newly acquire or form,
other than a partnership or joint venture, and
of which you are the sole owner or in which
you maintain an ownership interest of more
than 50%, will qualify as a Named Insured if
there is no other similar insurance available
to that organization. However:
a. Coverage under this provision is
afforded only:
(1) Until the 180th day after you acquire
or form the organization or the end
of the policy period, whichever is
earlier, if you do not report such
organization in writing to us within
180 days after you acquire or form it;
or
(2) Until the end of the policy period,
when that date is later than 180 days
after you acquire or form such
organization, if you report such
organization in writing to us within
180 days after you acquire or form it;
b. Coverage A does not apply to "bodily
injury" or "property damage" that
occurred before you acquired or formed
the organization; and
c. Coverage B does not apply to "personal
and advertising injury" arising out of an
offense committed before you acquired
or formed the organization.
For the purposes of Paragraph 1. of Section
II — Who Is An Insured, each such
organization will be deemed to be
designated in the Declarations as:
a. A limited liability company;
b. An organization other than a partnership,
joint venture or limited liability company;
or
c. A trust;
as indicated in its name or the documents
that govern its structure.
F. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED
CONTROLLING INTEREST
1. The following is added to SECTION II -
WHO IS AN INSURED:
Any person or organization that has financial
control of you is an insured with respect to
liability for "bodily injury", "property damage"
or "personal and advertising injury" that
arises out of:
a. Such financial control; or
b. Such person's or organization's
ownership, maintenance or use of
premises leased to or occupied by you.
The insurance provided to such person or
organization does not apply to structural
alterations, new construction or demolition
operations performed by or on behalf of such
person or organization.
2. The following is added to Paragraph 4. of
SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED:
This paragraph does not apply to any
premises owner, manager or lessor that has
financial control of you.
G. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED -
MORTGAGEES, ASSIGNEES, SUCCESSORS
OR RECEIVERS
The following is added to SECTION II - WHO IS
AN INSURED:
Any person or organization that is a mortgagee,
assignee, successor or receiver and that you
have agreed in a written contract or agreement
to include as an additional insured on this
Coverage Part is an insured, but only with
respect to its liability as mortgagee, assignee,
successor or receiver for "bodily injury", "property
damage" or "personal and advertising injury"
that:
a. Is "bodily injury" or "property damage" that
occurs, or is "personal and advertising injury"
caused by an offense that is committed,
CG D3 79 02 19
© 2017 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
subsequent to the signing of that contract or
agreement; and
b. Arises out of the ownership, maintenance or
use of the premises for which that
mortgagee, assignee, successor or receiver
is required under that contract or agreement
to be included as an additional insured on
this Coverage Part.
The insurance provided to such mortgagee,
assignee, successor or receiver is subject to the
following provisions:
a. The limits of insurance provided to such
mortgagee, assignee, successor or receiver
will be the minimum limits that you agreed to
provide in the written contract or agreement,
or the limits shown in the Declarations,
whichever are less.
b. The insurance provided to such person or
organization does not apply to:
(1) Any "bodily injury" or "property damage"
that occurs, or any "personal and
advertising injury" caused by an offense
that is committed, after such contract or
agreement is no longer in effect; or
(2) Any "bodily injury", "property damage" or
"personal and advertising injury" arising
out of any structural alterations, new
construction or demolition operations
performed by or on behalf of such
mortgagee, assignee, successor or
receiver.
H. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED -
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES - PERMITS OR
AUTHORIZATIONS RELATING TO PREMISES
The following is added to SECTION II - WHO IS
AN INSURED:
Any governmental entity that has issued a permit
or authorization with respect to premises owned
or occupied by, or rented or loaned to, you and
that you are required by any ordinance, law,
building code or written contract or agreement to
include as an additional insured on this
Coverage Part is an insured, but only with
respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property
damage" or "personal and advertising injury"
arising out of the existence, ownership, use,
maintenance, repair, construction, erection or
removal of any of the following for which that
governmental entity has issued such permit or
authorization: advertising signs, awnings,
canopies, cellar entrances, coal holes,
driveways, manholes, marquees, hoist away
openings, sidewalk vaults, elevators, street
banners or decorations.
I. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED -
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES - PERMITS
OR AUTHORIZATIONS RELATING TO
OPERATIONS
The following is added to SECTION II - WHO IS
AN INSURED:
Any governmental entity that has issued a permit
or authorization with respect to operations
performed by you or on your behalf and that you
are required by any ordinance, law, building code
or written contract or agreement to include as an
additional insured on this Coverage Part is an
insured, but only with respect to liability for
"bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal
and advertising injury" arising out of such
operations.
The insurance provided to such governmental
entity does not apply to:
a. Any "bodily injury", "property damage" or
"personal and advertising injury" arising out
of operations performed for the
governmental entity; or
b. Any "bodily injury" or "property damage"
included in the "products -completed
operations hazard".
J. INCIDENTAL MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
1. The following replaces Paragraph b. of the
definition of "occurrence" in the
DEFINITIONS Section:
b. An act or omission committed in
providing or failing to provide "incidental
medical services", first aid or "Good
Samaritan services" to a person, unless
you are in the business or occupation of
providing professional health care
services.
2. The following replaces the last paragraph of
Paragraph 2.a.(1) of SECTION II - WHO IS
AN INSURED:
Unless you are in the business or occupation
of providing professional health care
services, Paragraphs (1)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
above do not apply to "bodily injury" arising
out of providing or failing to provide:
(a) "Incidental medical services" by any of
your "employees" who is a nurse,
nurse assistant, emergency medical
technician, paramedic, athletic trainer,
audiologist, dietician, nutritionist,
© 2017 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
CG D3 79 02 19
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
occupational therapist or occupational
therapy assistant, physical therapist or
speech -language pathologist; or
(b) First aid or "Good Samaritan services"
by any of your "employees" or "volunteer
workers", other than an employed or
volunteer doctor. Any such "employees"
or "volunteer workers" providing or failing
to provide first aid or "Good Samaritan
services" during their work hours for you
will be deemed to be acting within the
scope of their employment by you or
performing duties related to the conduct
of your business.
3. The following replaces the last sentence of
Paragraph 5. of SECTION III - LIMITS OF
INSURANCE:
For the purposes of determining the
applicable Each Occurrence Limit, all related
acts or omissions committed in providing or
failing to provide "incidental medical
services", first aid or "Good Samaritan
services" to any one person will be deemed
to be one "occurrence".
4. The following exclusion is added to
Paragraph 2., Exclusions, of SECTION I -
COVERAGES - COVERAGE A - BODILY
INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE
LIABILITY:
Sale Of Pharmaceuticals
"Bodily injury" or "property damage" arising
out of the violation of a penal statute or
ordinance relating to the sale of
pharmaceuticals committed by, or with the
knowledge or consent of the insured.
5. The following is added to the DEFINITIONS
Section:
"Incidental medical services" means:
a. Medical, surgical, dental, laboratory, x-
ray or nursing service or treatment,
advice or instruction, or the related
furnishing of food or beverages; or
b. The furnishing or dispensing of drugs or
medical, dental, or surgical supplies or
appliances.
6. The following is added to Paragraph 4.b.,
Excess Insurance, of SECTION IV -
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CONDITIONS:
This insurance is excess over any valid and
collectible other insurance, whether primary,
excess, contingent or on any other basis,
that is available to any of your "employees"
for "bodily injury" that arises out of providing
or failing to provide "incidental medical
services" to any person to the extent not
subject to Paragraph 2.a.(1) of Section II —
Who Is An Insured.
K. MEDICAL PAYMENTS - INCREASED LIMIT
The following replaces Paragraph 7. of
SECTION III - LIMITS OF INSURANCE:
7. Subject to Paragraph 5. above, the Medical
Expense Limit is the most we will pay under
Coverage C for all medical expenses
because of "bodily injury" sustained by any
one person, and will be the higher of:
a. $10,000; or
b. The amount shown in the Declarations of
this Coverage Part for Medical Expense
Limit.
L. AMENDMENT OF EXCESS INSURANCE
CONDITION - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
The following is added to Paragraph 4.b.,
Excess Insurance, of SECTION IV -
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CONDITIONS:
This insurance is excess over any of the other
insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent
or on any other basis, that is Professional
Liability or similar coverage, to the extent the
loss is not subject to the professional services
exclusion of Coverage A or Coverage B.
M. BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION —
WHEN REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT
OR AGREEMENT
The following is added to Paragraph 8., Transfer
Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us,
of SECTION IV - COMMERCIAL GENERAL
LIABILITY CONDITIONS:
If the insured has agreed in a written contract or
agreement to waive that insured's right of
recovery against any person or organization, we
waive our right of recovery against such person
or organization, but only for payments we make
because of:
a. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" that
occurs; or
b. "Personal and advertising injury" caused by
an offense that is committed;
subsequent to the signing of that contract or
agreement.
CG D3 79 02 19
© 2017 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. Page 5 of 6 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
N. CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY - RAILROADS
1. The following replaces Paragraph c. of the
definition of "insured contract" in the
DEFINITIONS Section:
c. Any easement or license agreement;
2. Paragraph f.(1) of the definition of "insured
contract" in the DEFINITIONS Section is
deleted.
© 2017 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. CG D3 79 02 19 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
Albert A. Webb Associates
Policy Number: BA-9T94622A-25-43-G
Policy Term: 09/01/2025 to 09/01/2026
COMMERCIAL AUTO
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
BUSINESS AUTO EXTENSION ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF COVERAGE — This endorsement broadens coverage. However, coverage for any injury, damage or medical expenses described in any of the provisions of this endorsement may be excluded or limited by another endorsement to the Coverage Part, and these coverage broadening provisions do not apply to the extent that coverage is excluded or limited by such an endorsement. The following listing is a general cover- age description only. Limitations and exclusions may apply to these coverages. Read all the provisions of this en- dorsement and the rest of your policy carefully to determine rights, duties, and what is and is not covered.
A. BROAD FORM NAMED INSURED
B. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED
C. EMPLOYEE HIRED AUTO
D. EMPLOYEES AS INSURED
E. SUPPLEMENTARY PAYMENTS - INCREASED
LIMITS
F. HIRED AUTO - LIMITED WORLDWIDE COV-
ERAGE - INDEMNITY BASIS
G. WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE - GLASS
PROVISIONS
A. BROAD FORM NAMED INSURED
The following is added to Paragraph A.1., Who Is
An Insured, of SECTION II — COVERED AUTOS
LIABILITY COVERAGE:
Any organization you newly acquire or form dur-
ing the policy period over which you maintain
50% or more ownership interest and that is not
separately insured for Business Auto Coverage.
Coverage under this provision is afforded only un-
til the 180th day after you acquire or form the or-
ganization or the end of the policy period, which-
ever is earlier.
B. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED
The following is added to Paragraph c. in A.1.,
Who Is An Insured, of SECTION II - COVERED
AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE:
Any person or organization who is required under
a written contract or agreement between you and
that person or organization, that is signed and
executed by you before the "bodily injury" or
"property damage" occurs and that is in effect
during the policy period, to be named as an addi-
tional insured is an "insured" for Covered Autos
Liability Coverage, but only for damages to which
H.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
HIRED AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE - LOSS OF
USE - INCREASED LIMIT
PHYSICAL DAMAGE - TRANSPORTATION
EXPENSES - INCREASED LIMIT
PERSONAL PROPERTY
AIRBAGS
NOTICE AND KNOWLEDGE OF ACCIDENT OR
LOSS
BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
UNINTENTIONAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS
this insurance applies and only to the extent that
person or organization qualifies as an "insured"
under the Who Is An Insured provision contained
in Section II.
C. EMPLOYEE HIRED AUTO
1. The following is added to Paragraph A.1.,
Who Is An Insured, of SECTION II - COV-
ERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE:
An "employee" of yours is an "insured" while
operating an "auto" hired or rented under a
contract or agreement in an "employee's"
name, with your permission, while performing
duties related to the conduct of your busi-
ness.
2. The following replaces Paragraph b. in B.5.,
Other Insurance, of SECTION IV - BUSI-
NESS AUTO CONDITIONS:
b. For Hired Auto Physical Damage Cover-
age, the following are deemed to be cov-
ered "autos" you own:
(1) Any covered "auto" you lease, hire,
rent or borrow; and
(2) Any covered "auto" hired or rented by
your "employee" under a contract in
an "employee's" name, with your
CA T3 53 02 15
© 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 4 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
COMMERCIAL AUTO
permission, while performing duties
related to the conduct of your busi-
ness.
However, any "auto" that is leased, hired,
rented or borrowed with a driver is not a
covered "auto".
D. EMPLOYEES AS INSURED
The following is added to Paragraph A.1., Who Is
An Insured, of SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS
LIABILITY COVERAGE:
Any "employee" of yours is an "insured" while us-
ing a covered "auto" you don't own, hire or borrow
in your business or your personal affairs.
E. SUPPLEMENTARY PAYMENTS - INCREASED
LIMITS
1. The following replaces Paragraph A.2.a.(2),
of SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS LIABIL-
ITY COVERAGE:
(2) Up to $3,000 for cost of bail bonds (in-
cluding bonds for related traffic law viola-
tions) required because of an "accident"
we cover. We do not have to furnish
these bonds.
2. The following replaces Paragraph A.2.a.(4),
of SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS LIABIL-
ITY COVERAGE:
(4) All reasonable expenses incurred by the
"insured" at our request, including actual
loss of earnings up to $500 a day be-
cause of time off from work.
F. HIRED AUTO — LIMITED WORLDWIDE COV-
ERAGE — INDEMNITY BASIS
The following replaces Subparagraph (5) in Para-
graph B.7., Policy Period, Coverage Territory,
of SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDI-
TIONS:
(5)
Anywhere in the world, except any country or
jurisdiction while any trade sanction, em-
bargo, or similar regulation imposed by the
United States of America applies to and pro-
hibits the transaction of business with or
within such country or jurisdiction, for Cov-
ered Autos Liability Coverage for any covered
"auto" that you lease, hire, rent or borrow
without a driver for a period of 30 days or less
and that is not an "auto" you lease, hire, rent
or borrow from any of your "employees",
partners (if you are a partnership), members
(if you are a limited liability company) or
members of their households.
(a) With respect to any claim made or "suit"
brought outside the United States of
America, the territories and possessions
of the United States of America, Puerto
Rico and Canada:
(i)
You must arrange to defend the "in-
sured" against, and investigate or set-
tle any such claim or "suit" and keep
us advised of all proceedings and ac-
tions.
(ii) Neither you nor any other involved
"insured" will make any settlement
without our consent.
(iii) We may, at our discretion, participate
in defending the "insured" against, or
in the settlement of, any claim or
"suit".
(iv) We will reimburse the "insured" for
sums that the "insured" legally must
pay as damages because of "bodily
injury" or "property damage" to which
this insurance applies, that the "in-
sured" pays with our consent, but
only up to the limit described in Para-
graph C., Limits Of Insurance, of
SECTION II — COVERED AUTOS
LIABILITY COVERAGE.
(v) We will reimburse the "insured" for
the reasonable expenses incurred
with our consent for your investiga-
tion of such claims and your defense
of the "insured" against any such
"suit", but only up to and included
within the limit described in Para-
graph C., Limits Of Insurance, of
SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS
LIABILITY COVERAGE, and not in
addition to such limit. Our duty to
make such payments ends when we
have used up the applicable limit of
insurance in payments for damages,
settlements or defense expenses.
(b) This insurance is excess over any valid
and collectible other insurance available
to the "insured" whether primary, excess,
contingent or on any other basis.
(c) This insurance is not a substitute for re-
quired or compulsory insurance in any
country outside the United States, its ter-
ritories and possessions, Puerto Rico and
Canada.
© 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
CA T3 53 02 15
COMMERCIAL AUTO
You agree to maintain all required or
compulsory insurance in any such coun-
try up to the minimum limits required by
local law. Your failure to comply with
compulsory insurance requirements will
not invalidate the coverage afforded by
this policy, but we will only be liable to the
same extent we would have been liable
had you complied with the compulsory in-
surance requirements.
(d) It is understood that we are not an admit-
ted or authorized insurer outside the
United States of America, its territories
and possessions, Puerto Rico and Can-
ada. We assume no responsibility for the
furnishing of certificates of insurance, or
for compliance in any way with the laws
of other countries relating to insurance.
G. WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE — GLASS
The following is added to Paragraph D., Deducti-
ble, of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE
COVERAGE:
No deductible for a covered "auto" will apply to
glass damage if the glass is repaired rather than
replaced.
H. HIRED AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE - LOSS OF
USE - INCREASED LIMIT
The following replaces the last sentence of Para-
graph A.4.b., Loss Of Use Expenses, of SEC-
TION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE:
However, the most we will pay for any expenses
for loss of use is $65 per day, to a maximum of
$750 for any one "accident".
I. PHYSICAL DAMAGE - TRANSPORTATION
EXPENSES - INCREASED LIMIT
The following replaces the first sentence in Para-
graph A.4.a., Transportation Expenses, of
SECTION III — PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVER-
AGE:
We will pay up to $50 per day to a maximum of
$1,500 for temporary transportation expense in-
curred by you because of the total theft of a cov-
ered "auto" of the private passenger type.
J. PERSONAL PROPERTY
The following is added to Paragraph A.4., Cover-
age Extensions, of SECTION III — PHYSICAL
DAMAGE COVERAGE:
Personal Property
We will pay up to $400 for "loss" to wearing ap-
parel and other personal property which is:
(1) Owned by an "insured"; and
(2) In or on your covered "auto".
This coverage applies only in the event of a total
theft of your covered "auto".
No deductibles apply to this Personal Property
coverage.
K. AIRBAGS
The following is added to Paragraph B.3., Exclu-
sions, of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE
COVERAGE:
Exclusion 3.a. does not apply to "loss" to one or
more airbags in a covered "auto" you own that in-
flate due to a cause other than a cause of "loss"
set forth in Paragraphs A.1.b. and A.1.c., but
only:
a. If that "auto" is a covered "auto" for Compre-
hensive Coverage under this policy;
b. The airbags are not covered under any war-
ranty; and
c. The airbags were not intentionally inflated.
We will pay up to a maximum of $1,000 for any
one "loss".
L. NOTICE AND KNOWLEDGE OF ACCIDENT OR
LOSS
The following is added to Paragraph A.2.a., of
SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS:
Your duty to give us or our authorized representa-
tive prompt notice of the "accident" or "loss" ap-
plies only when the "accident" or "loss" is known
to:
(a) You (if you are an individual);
(b) A partner (if you are a partnership);
(c) A member (if you are a limited liability com-
pany);
(d) An executive officer, director or insurance
manager (if you are a corporation or other or-
ganization); or
(e) Any "employee" authorized by you to give no-
tice of the "accident" or "loss".
M. BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
The following replaces Paragraph A.5., Transfer
Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us,
of SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDI-
TIONS:
5. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against
Others To Us
We waive any right of recovery we may have
against any person or organization to the ex-
tent required of you by a written contract
signed and executed prior to any "accident"
or "loss", provided that the "accident" or "loss"
arises out of operations contemplated by
CA T3 53 02 15
© 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
COMMERCIAL AUTO
such contract. The waiver applies only to the
person or organization designated in such
contract.
N. UNINTENTIONAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS
The following is added to Paragraph B.2., Con-
cealment, Misrepresentation, Or Fraud, of
SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS:
The unintentional omission of, or unintentional
error in, any information given by you shall not
prejudice your rights under this insurance. How-
ever this provision does not affect our right to col-
lect additional premium or exercise our right of
cancellation or non -renewal.
© 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission.
CA T3 53 02 15
TRAVELERS)
ONE TOWER SQUARE
HARTFORD CT 06183
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY
ENDORSEMENT WC 99 03 76 ( A) - 003
POLICY NUMBER: UB-4)648178-25-43-G
WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS
ENDORSEMENT - CALIFORNIA
(BLANKET WAIVER)
We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule.
The additional premium for this endorsement shall be 2.00 % of the California workers' compensation pre- mium.
Person or Organization
ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION
FOR WHICH THE INSURED HAS
AGREED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT
EXECUTED PRIOR TO LOSS TO
FURNISH THIS WAIVER.
Schedule
Job Description
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.
(The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.)
Endorsement Effective 9/1/2025-9/1/2026 Policy No. UB-4J648178-25-43-G Endorsement No.
Insured Albert A. Webb Associates Premium
Insurance Company Countersigned by
DATE OF ISSUE: 09-1-23
ST ASSIGN: Page 1 of
BEAUMONT
C A L I F O R N I A
California Levine Act Statement
California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits any Beaumont City Council Member from participating in any action related to a contract or application if he or she receives any political contributions totaling more than $500 within the previous twelve months, and for twelve months following the date a final decision from the business/board or applicant.
The Levine Act also requires a member of the Beaumont City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding.
Current Beaumont City Council Members are listed at:
https://www.beaumontca.govl29/City-Council
Proposers are responsible for accessing this link to review the names prior to answering the following questions.
1. Have you or your company, or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any Beaumont City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application, or the anticipated date of any Council action? YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
X NO
2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any Beaumont City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application?
YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
X NO
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the Beaumont City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It does however, preclude the identified Council Member(s) from participating in any actions related to your proposal or application.
April 6, 2026
94r
Digitally signed by Joseph C. Caldwell
DN: C=uS,
Eyoseph.caled [email protected],
O=Albert A. Webb Associates, CN=Joseph C.
Caldwell
Reason: I agree to the terms defined by the
placement of my signature on this document
Date: 2026.04.0616:38:56-07'00'
Date Signature of authorized individual
Albert A. Webb Associates
Company/Applicant Name
City of Beaumont 1550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, CA 92223 I (951) 769-8520 I BeaumontCA.gov
BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N A -
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, City Engineer I Public Works Director BY: Dustin Christensen, Principal Engineer
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Fehr & Peers Professional Service Agreement — Capital Improvement Project (CIP) R26-13 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Description: Award a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Fehr & Peers for the preparation of a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (CIP R26-08).
Background and Analysis:
On August 19, 2025, the City Council approved a Grant Agreement between the City and the Riverside County Transportation Commission. This grant awarded SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program funding for the completion of a new citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
The City's current Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan was last updated in 2011. This project will provide a new and updated citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan that will guide future bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements, active transportation planning, and related policy implementation efforts.
On February 24, 2026, the City publicly issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) inviting qualified planning and traffic design consultants to submit proposals for the preparation of a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Highlights of the scope of services include the following:
• Project Management
• Review and analysis of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Bicycle and Pedestrian network development and conceptual design • Community and stakeholder engagement
• Final updated citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
On March 23, 2026, the City received six (6) proposals in response to its request. Each firm was evaluated by a four -person panel of city staff from the public works and planning departments. Proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria:
• Demonstrated Professional Skills and Credentials (20%) • Related Experience and Previous Projects (15%)
• Understanding of the Scope of Services (25%)
• Approach to Performing the Services (25%)
• Ability and Available Resources to perform the required services (15%) Based on the proposal evaluations and scoring, staff recommend awarding a contract to Fehr & Peers. Fehr & Peers provided the best scope and team to perform the work.
Fehr & Peers are also very familiar with the city and have a long relationship delivering quality work. Their previous work within the city will aid them in providing a more detailed and thorough master plan.
For reference and transparency, the full proposal from Fehr & Peers has been included as an attachment to this report. The scope and fee provided is commensurate with the level of effort required to complete the proposed work.
Fiscal Impact:
The cost to prepare this staff report is estimated to be $350.
Funding for this Project is provided by CIP R26-13 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
The following is a summary of the funding and budget for the project:
CIP R26-13 Bicycle & Pedestrian Path Master Plan Project Funding Summary
Estimated Total Project Budget= $396,699
Current Project Budget= $396,699
CIP R26-13 Bicycle & Pedestrian Path Master Plan Project Budget Summary
Project
Component
Est. Total
Budget
Current Paid to Remaining
Budget Date Budget
Project Management
MIR
Preliminary Services
Environmental
Design
$396,699 $396,699
Permits
Right -of -Way
I
Construction
Construction Management
Equipment
otal
$396,699
$396,699
$-
Recommended Action:
Approve the agreement with Fehr and Peers for professional planning and design services, for the period of May 5, 2026, through May 5, 2031, in an amount not to exceed $248,110;
Approve the contingency of $24,811 for a total not -to -exceed of $272,921 and authorize the City Manager to sign off on any preceding amendments or purchase change orders within the authorized contingency amount; and,
Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to Fehr & Peers in the amount of $248,110 for professional planning and design services.
Attachments:
A. Proposal and Fee for Planning and Design Services — Fehr & Peers B. Professional Services Agreement — Fehr & Peers
C. Levine Act Statement — Fehr & Peers
Fehr & Peers
Proposal for City of
Beaumont Bicycle &
Pedestrian Master Plan
Prepared for:
City of Beaumont
I
Submitted on:
March 23, 2026
Submitted by:
Fehr & Peers
A. Cover Letter
March 23, 2026
Re: Request for Proposal for
Planning & Design Services for
the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master
Plan Update
Barbara Mason
Purchasing Manager
City of Beaumont
[email protected]
2025 Client
Feedback
Client survey results show
we consistently met or
exceeded expectations:
99% in quality
98% in value
99% in service
100% say they would use us again
Dear Barbara,
Fehr& Peers
We love working with Beaumont. Since completing the City's Mobility Element in 2020, we have enjoyed helping the City with critical issues that are important both to residents and elected officials. This has included implementation of aspects of the Mobility Element, serving as an extension of City staff related to reviewing studies submitted for development projects, and working on critically needed infrastructure like the I-10/Highland Springs and I-10/Oak Valley interchanges. Our deep understanding of all modes of travel in Beaumont has helped us better inform and advise City decision makers for each of those projects.
The Mobility Element took a thoughtful approach to implementing a layered network of complete streets. Coming into this project with an understanding of these layers, and the context for which modes should be prioritized on each street, sets us up for success as we approach this new Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
However, some things have changed since the Mobility Element was completed, including our work on a much more focused truck route study, the results of which did suggest modifications to the truck system. One of the key components of this effort will be to take a more detailed look at the pedestrian and bicycle planned systems and ensure that we separate those vulnerable users from heavy vehicle truck routes to maximize safety on those streets.
Other important factors to be addressed as part of this effort include the City's recent assessment of the downtown area of 6th Street, the massive industrial development activity that has occurred in the southwest part of the City, and safe access for kids to schools. This is the optimum time to complete this effort, and we believe we are the right firm to do this for the City of Beaumont.
Our internal team consists of both planners and engineers. This blend ensures that the plan includes policy language and direction for implementation, but also ensures that any treatments we propose on City streets can be delivered in a practical way. Furthermore, many members of our team (including myself) already know the City, City Council, and other key stakeholders, as well as city processes and regulations. All of this will allow us to hit the ground running, and ultimately increase the value of the project for the City. Donna Lewandowski, our project manager, served as an Active Transportation Planner for local and state governments for 20 years. She brings a deep understanding of public agency needs and processes as well as the needs of the community. She is also a certified Road Safety Professional 2 in the Behavioral discipline (RSP2B).
Please note that I am authorized to negotiate contracts on behalf of Fehr & Peers. As such, please coordinate directly with me (contact 2 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan
information is below).
Jason D. Pack, P.E.
Principal
3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420
Riverside, CA 92501
951.274.4800
[email protected]
I will note that, although I am authorized to negotiate the contract on behalf of Fehr & Peers, if our contractual fee is over $250,000 the contract will need to be signed by a vice president of the firm. As such, Sarah Brandenberg, P.E., a vice president of our firm has co- signed this letter to affirm our commitment to the City of Beaumont, acknowledge the accuracy of the information contained within this proposal, and she will be the one ultimately executing the contract (if needed).
We affirm that the information above is accurate and that Sarah and I have the ability to negotiate and execute a contract with the City as required. We further certify that Fehr & Peers, under penalty of perjury, complies with nondiscrimination requirements of the State and Federal Government.
If you have any questions or concerns about our proposal, please reach out directly. Otherwise, we hope to continue to improve the community of Beaumont!
Sincerely,
FEHR & PEERS
Jason D. Pack, PE
Principal
Fehr & Peers
Sarah Brandenberg, TE
Vice President
Fehr & Peers
Putting People First in Every
Solution
Whether it's people or goods,
we work with communities
to plan for safe, efficient
movement that supports
their needs. We strive to be
national leaders in planning,
engineering, research, and
operations, and work to
remain at the forefront of
transportation technology,
policy, and design.
Recognizing the diverse
needs and different ways
our transportation systems
work for people, our data -
driven strategies help clients
confidently reach their goals,
creating lasting impact for all
members of the communities
we serve.
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 3
Table
of Contents
Technical Proposal
B
Cover Letter
Page :a
Key Staff
Introduction/
Information
E
Firm Profile
F
Scope of Services Approach
G H
Additional Information References Resumes
Appendix
Sample Project Sheets Page 4-3
This proposal reads like a
book.
We've adjusted the settings
to two -page spread view to
make your digital reading
experience more enjoyable.
Happy reading!
4 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan
B. Introduction/Information
At Fehr & Peers, we are passionate about
transforming transportation consulting through
innovation and creativity. We derive inspiration
from partnering with communities like Beaumont
to understand and help them shape local
transportation futures objectively tailored to their
unique community needs. Above all, we prioritize
these relationships.
As we grow, our commitment to inclusive, local,
and long-term community partnerships remains
central to our philosophy. Together with our clients,
we are motivated by shared success, and the
positive impact our work has on the communities
we serve. Improving communities is at the heart of
everything that Fehr & Peers does.
With a local office in Riverside, we are familiar
with the western Riverside region. We know that
Beaumont is one of California's fastest -growing
cities, with a population increase of over 17% since
2020, when we worked with the City to prepare
the Mobility Element of the Elevate Beaumont
2040 General Plan Update. We understand how
high rates of community growth present many
challenges to Cities and City Staff. It can be difficult to find a balance that provides for the infrastructure
needs of the community, while protecting the
things that make Beaumont, Beaumont —the
rural mountain environment, the small-town
community feel, and access to the things that
make a community and its residents able to live
a healthy and vibrant life: good jobs, recreational
opportunities, and community services.
Beaumont residents and visitors alike desire safe,
connected, and enjoyable networks for walking,
rolling, or bicycling. This project presents a major
opportunity for the City of Beaumont to develop
an updated, comprehensive Bicycle & Pedestrian
Master Plan (Plan) that will enhance the existing
transportation network by integrating bicycle and
pedestrian improvements using a context -sensitive
approach. The Elevate Beaumont Mobility Element
included a Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Network
map. This new project represents a chance to
build on that preliminary work, to develop a
comprehensive and cohesive network for active
transportation users.
Together, we can build an extensive citywide
plan with a complete bicycle and pedestrian
network that connects residents and visitors to
both everyday services and outdoor recreation
amenities. We can build a plan that will identify and
prioritize a community and data -driven vision for
safe, inviting, multi -modal transportation in and
around the City, while providing City staff with the
resources and tools needed to secure funding for
implementation.
Data -Driven, Locally Grounded Deliverables
We approach bicycle and pedestrian network
planning with a data -driven methodology based
on state and federal best practices documents,
such as the FHWA's Bikeway Selection Guide.
This methodology will set the baseline, but all
recommendations will be grounded in the local
context of Beaumont.
The Team
Our team is structured to deliver the full range of
services requested, blending expertise in active
transportation planning and design, as well as
thoughtful community engagement. The team
includes both planners and engineers. Some
already know the city well and can provide detailed
local understanding, while others will bring an
outside perspective to the planning process.
Expert Knowledge
From our work on similar plans, we recognize
several considerations that will be especially
important for this project. First, acknowledging
local history and maintaining the character
of the community through context -sensitive
recommendations is essential for a successful
plan. Second, every street has unique physical
challenges that require both creativity and
engineering expertise. Lastly, knowledge of grant
funding sources and scoring is paramount to
project prioritization, so that impactful walking
and biking improvements can be advanced to
implementation.
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 5
C. Firm Profile
Fehr & Peers
We are a California -based S Corporation providing transportation planning and engineering services, with 25 offices and over 400 staff nationwide. Since 1985, we've partnered with public and private clients to design safer, more effective ways for people and goods to move —creating spaces where everyone can thrive, today and for generations to come.
Bringing together data, technology, and the lived experiences of the communities we serve, we help clients make confident, well-informed decisions. Along the way, we've earned national recognition for raising the bar on how transportation projects are planned, designed, and delivered. Many of our first clients still trust us with their transportation needs after decades of collaboration —a testament to the strong partnerships we build and the innovative mindset we bring to every project. We don't just follow trends —we help clients anticipate what's next.
LOCATION OF
THE PRINCIPAL
OFFICE THAT WILL
BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION
OF THIS
CONTRACT
3880 Lemon Street
Suite 420
Riverside, CA 92501
954.274.4800
• Year Founded: 1985
• Form: S -Corporation
• Number of Employees:
403
• Number of Offices: 25
Services Offered
With a blend of multimodal expertise, national perspective, and local insight fueled by our strong and longstanding relationships, we tailor solutions across a wide range of services to meet each community's unique needs.
Active Transportation
Climate Resilience & Evacuation
Community Engagement & Equity
Complete Streets
Curbside Management
Data Science
Emerging Technologies
Engineering & Design
Freight & Goods Movement
Grant Funding
Land Use & Transportation
Multimodal Operations Analysis
Parking
Public Lands & Recreation
Safe Routes to School
Safe System & Vision Zero
Sports Venues & Special Events
Transit Planning
Transportation Demand Management
Transportation Economics
Travel Behavior Forecasting
Visual Storytelling
VMT Impacts
6 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan
Fehr & Peers Office Locations and Number of Staff
Fehr & Peers has 25 offices nationwide, ranging in size from 2 to 56 employees each. This includes five branch offices in Southern California (Riverside, Orange County, Los Angeles, Long Beach and San Diego).
We will primarily serve the City of Beaumont from our Riverside office and will supplement it with support from our other Southern California offices.
00 •0000.0•
0000 ••00410,.041.0
6000 0.0000••0000.0.00
•00 0041000060041600606000,190110000001,60001100041000 0041000410000004111000410000004100,004,0410000111000000410 0 •0e 0000.••..0..000.00••000.00.0.00.01.000•.00.•10•••
•••...••••••.••••..••0.•.•.•••..•.••.••.,••..•.00..• •
0 ....e......v..•s6..e..........................• .00 00• • �•••..•....•....•••..........1.••••.•••.••••••••••••••••..f 00 0000000000000,00000000004100000,600000004000000110000000000 •0•.00..0•.0••0,0•.•00.000.00000.00••000•.0.41.•0.06.00.00.. •.••••••••••••.•••••1•••..•••••••.•••.•••••••.••••.•.•••.•• •6 •.•1.••.•.0.16.1••000••1.0,•.•0•►0.••0/0.1••1•.••1•••0.1.•• •04.
0.6000••••.y ••.•.•.00•••0•••.••••••.•••••••••••••••••0••• ••••c •••.•.•006• ••••.••••••.••6.••••••••.•.•••••••.•••••••••• 000001 00000000000 00111041000000000000000001900001,00.000000.00110000 •410000► •••41.00.1•.0,•••01••6.6••1••.0••1•••.••.••••••0•••.••0.0••• •.00061 ••••••••.•••••.•••.•••••••.•••.•••••01••••0.•••.0..••••0•• •00000 •000.60.0600• •••••••••••6.0.10••••1.6••0..••••010.••011.••0•••.1.0..•.0• 00600 .•116••••••16 400•.•••••••••••0••••••••••••.•••••••••••••.••••0••O••••••• 0.••01 •••0..1.0.0.. ,►•9••0,.•0•••00.000•••0••.0.0••••00••••••••.••••••0••••••••• 0.0••••0••••••0.•••••• --.71•••0,6•.0,0.0, •••••.•.6.06••610...•0••1•.•.•60.600•.•••0,.6••6•••••••••.•0••• •••.•••••••• .•0.•0s0410v••.00.6.0••6•.0.60••00•••0•.0.0••0.00.•0006.00.0•• 00000600060.0011111...0060000660.0000000000••.0.•600000•.0.•0•.06••00.06.006 161 .464,00000000000000000000 00000000900011001041•0000111,0001100000000000.060800 e1 •1.1••10•••..•.1••1.•• •••••010.1.1.1•.1••1••11••1.11••1•••11•.•.1.1•••333•• .1..•.0..••...•...•.•• •.••.1•••0,.41.0•..•.•.•.6...1•.•...•••.....1.1..•...
A•v6e416sssv..es.vv00,6v.. 0000•••.00.0,060.0.•.0.0.•00.••00.100•..000•..6.►60• 900000.•.00000.000000.0,.6•••.•...0000000...00000000000,.00000000./.•••0.•..00 :0000..0000.060.01.6.600•.060.00s•0•••se000006.000000060000,6.0.60006.0.0000.6 9••.•.••••••.66••1.11••.••••....•41.1••11•••.•••..•.••••1.•.••••.••••6••••••.0 .6/0.000000.10.410••010.0.0••410041.0410000.•.6000000041.//0,••000••0.1.1.0..•0.00•• .*0000•e•...0.0.0..0.•••.•••••••••0,•••••••••.•1.0.0••.••••.•00.0••.•..•...••••01 ^"t^v••••.••••.0•••.•.••.•.0•.•••00•.0.0••.0.00••••••••••v••••.••••0•••••••••• •••••••0.0••••e•••••0•••.•••v••••s•••••0••••0.••••..•••6••.•.••••••.•0• D00000•••••••.•••••.•••••.••••••0041••••s•••••.••ss••0•.s.41•••0•.se•0.•• ! ! 49060•.10...•0.060.•0.61.0...se.se•.e..1..0.•1.••..•e••••..6•.•41s••410 =00.0,1.0410•.••.••000.0060000000000..•••0.00••0.6000000000000006.6.0 >••00000.00.s/41.0410.000000600000000.0000000.41•.••.•••..010•••06041•• ! -.a•.••►••0•appppespspeasolDppeeopve•ps1••600,66.00.0.0••.•00.0.0.00.•• 70000006.© •.•••s•••1.•••.••••e•••••••
00C 9064104140000,0000011000000000
414.- _ _ .. _ Q _.•141.41•••••••0••••••1•••••
•p►or9irv6ralvgolr•vviouv (0.41000•••0.0.0.••.001.10•
seeeresl •0.0.00./ 0 ••••0•..•0.000.•0..•0.000•
0.0.0.00.► _,0••6.00•••6.0000•.•••0.6.60
••.••••••• 06 0990••.••••••.•••••6••.0•.6.00•
•.6.000000000••00000600000000000000• •• 0.6.6
•006000.600.00••0000.0000.1.600 • 41•
••600.0••••06.0..•66••.0•.••1.•6 •
•e••. 9040.000•0004 •• • 00 •
V0ilie
O`n
O
Office
Locations
Portland
Seattle
Tacoma
Roseville
Sacramento
Stockton
Rocky Mountain South
(Boise
Boulder
Denver
Salt Lake City
Dallas
Orlando
Tampa
see***
•0.000,
00•..09
96000'00,,
•6666.4
••6.6666,
0000011,00000
600000••066.
6006000606 9
000
e..
Bay Area Southwest
Oakland
Petaluma
San Francisco
San Jose
Walnut Creek
East
Washington D.C.
Los Angeles
Long Beach
Orange County
Phoenix
Riverside
San Diego
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 7