Beaumont City Council
May 5, 2026

D. Key Staff
Brief Biographies
Jason Pack, PE

PRINCIPAL I PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE
Jason is a Principal at Fehr & Peers with more than 26 years of experience delivering transportation planning and engineering solutions for communities across California.

As Principal -in -Charge, Jason will provide strategic oversight and senior technical guidance, drawing on extensive experience with corridor plans, active transportation studies, and multimodal mobility analyses. He has completed more than 20 projects for the City of Beaumont, including circulation planning, corridor studies, and transportation peer reviews, giving him a strong understanding of the City's transportation network and planning priorities. Jason also brings deep expertise in travel demand analysis, VMT assessment, and multimodal corridor planning, helping agencies develop implementable strategies that support safer, more connected bicycle and pedestrian networks.

Donna Lewandowski

ASSOCIATE I PROJECT MANAGER
Donna has more than 22 years of experience advancing transportation safety, active transportation, and public health initiatives. She brings extensive project management experience leading multimodal planning efforts that integrate data -driven safety analysis, field assessments, and community engagement to develop practical recommendations for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Donna has managed numerous safety and active transportation studies, including Complete Streets safety assessments and Safe Routes to School programs across Southern California, where she led collision analysis, corridor evaluations, and stakeholder coordination to develop implementable improvement strategies. Her background working with state and local agencies provides a strong understanding of agency processes and grant -funded planning efforts, helping communities translate planning recommendations into projects that enhance safety, connectivity, and accessibility for all roadway users.

Matt Benjamin

PRINCIPAL I TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Matt brings more than 20 years of experience advancing multimodal transportation and safety initiatives across Southern California. For this project, Matt will provide technical support informed by his extensive work on active transportation plans, Safe Routes to School programs, and pedestrian safety studies. His experience includes leading complex multimodal planning efforts that integrate collision analysis, field assessments, and community engagement to develop practical safety improvements and connected bicycle and pedestrian networks. Matt has helped cities develop implementable strategies that prioritize safety, improve access to schools and transit, and position communities for active transportation grant funding. 8 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Jolene Hayes

PRINCIPAL I TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Jolene has more than 26 years of experience in transportation planning, land use, and mobility policy development. For this project, Jolene will provide technical support informed by her extensive work on circulation and mobility element updates, multimodal planning, and corridor studies throughout Southern California. Her experience includes evaluating transportation networks, integrating bicycle and pedestrian facilities into broader mobility plans, and working with communities and agencies to balance safety, accessibility, and economic needs. Jolene also brings direct experience working with the City of Beaumont, where she led the Beaumont Truck Routing Study, providing valuable insight into the City's transportation system and planning priorities.

Trevor Lien

SENIOR ENGINEER/PLANNER I PLANNING LEAD
Trevor has spent more than a decade delivering data -driven active transportation and multimodal planning projects across Southern California. As Planning Lead, Trevor will guide the development of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan using a data - driven approach that integrates safety analysis, network connectivity evaluation, and implementable design strategies. His experience includes leading and supporting bicycle master plans, active transportation plans, and multimodal implementation strategies for agencies such as the Orange County Transportation Authority, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, and the City of San Diego.

Trevor's work focuses on identifying network gaps, prioritizing improvements, and developing feasible bicycle and pedestrian recommendations that position communities for successful implementation and future funding.

Claude Strayer

PRINCIPAL I ENGINEERING LEAD
Claude is a transportation engineer with more than 16 years of experience designing multimodal roadway improvements that enhance safety and accessibility for people walking and biking. As Engineering Lead, Claude will guide the development of planning -level design concepts and feasibility assessments for recommended bicycle and pedestrian improvements. His experience includes the design of bikeways, intersection treatments, traffic signal upgrades, signing and striping plans, and sidewalk improvements, with work supporting complete streets initiatives and active transportation projects across the country. Claude regularly leads multidisciplinary teams in developing concept designs and preparing implementation -ready materials that help agencies move bicycle and pedestrian improvements from planning into delivery.

Kristin Brown

SENIOR ENGINEER/PLANNER I OUTREACH
Kristin Brown has ten years of experience designing and leading community engagement programs that support inclusive, people -focused transportation planning.

As Outreach Lead, Kristin will guide engagement for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, building on her experience delivering outreach for active transportation and Safe Routes to School initiatives. She has led stakeholder interviews, workshops, pop-up events, and data -driven engagement strategies that connect with residents, businesses, and community groups, and translate input into actionable recommendations. Kristin's approach emphasizes meeting people where they are, elevating diverse perspectives, and helping agencies develop bicycle and pedestrian plans that reflect community priorities and support successful implementation.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 9

E. Scope of Services
Fehr & Peers' extensive prior work for the City of
Beaumont has given us a thorough understanding
of transportation in the City. Being able to build
on the analysis and mapping performed for these
previous studies (including the current Circulation
Element, and the recent Truck Route Study) will
allow us to focus more time and effort on providing
solutions, developing concepts and creating
materials that will directly translate into impactful
grant applications.

Task 1— Project
Management
Task 1.1 Project Initiation
Fehr & Peers will facilitate a kick-off meeting
with the Beaumont Project Management team to
review project communication protocols, schedule,
scope of work, and data needs. This meeting will
also serve as our first opportunity to hear from
City staff on their overall vision for the project and
any context that the project team should keep
front and center, such as any new or ongoing
transportation projects, industrial developments
and truck routes, market conditions, or design
concerns.

We will work with City staff to determine the
optimal composition of a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC). Once convened, this
committee will serve in an advisory capacity for
the development of the Master Plan by helping
to determine the goals and targets of the Plan,
incorporating input from other agencies and
stakeholders, and providing feedback during key
phases of Plan development.

Task 1.2 Project Schedule
and Management
Fehr & Peers will work with City staff to finalize a
detailed project schedule that identifies meeting
schedules, key milestones and deliverables. As
Project Manager, Donna will be responsible for
monitoring schedule adherence and managing
the workload and resource assignments of the
technical team. The schedule will be monitored
and updated as necessary throughout the project
period, in coordination with City staff. Fehr &
Peers will closely track the project budget, using
monthly progress reports as a ledger of work
completed, and a check -in point with Beaumont to
demonstrate project progress.

Task 1.3 Meetings and Coordination
Fehr & Peers will set up recurring conference calls
with the Beaumont Project Management team
for the duration of the project, using Microsoft
Teams or another platform if preferred by the City.

Early on, these meetings may be used for focused
discussions on urgent topics such as data needs,
goals and objectives, the composition of the BPAC,
upcoming outreach, etc. Other calls may be used
simply for updates on progress. The calls will be
bi-weekly for the majority of the project schedule,
through the development of the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Network (Task 5). After that, we have
assumed that coordination calls can be monthly,
with additional communication on an as -needed
basis. We will provide agendas in advance of each
meeting and share meeting notes with participants
within one business day following each meeting.

In addition to regular management conference
calls, we anticipate four meetings with the BPAC
during the project period. We envision these
meetings to be held in person with a call -in option,
but can be held entirely virtually if preferred. We
will fine-tune the topics for each BPAC meeting,
but these may include:

Session 1: Introduce the project to the committee,
help them understand the overall role of the BPAC,
and the expectations of being a member. Provide
input on the community engagement strategy and
public outreach activities.

Session 2: Set the goals and targets for the Plan,
and identify opportunities for —and challenges to —
improved bicycle and pedestrian access.

Session 3: Interactive review of the recommended
10 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Bicycle and Pedestrian Network, and corridor
prioritization methodology.

Session 4: Interactive review of the Draft Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan, and provide input on
potential implementation strategies.

The sessions described above are intended to
provide an example of how the series of BPAC
meetings could be designed. Our team is open to
other engagement strategies, and looks forward to
working with the City to refine the role of the BPAC
and meeting progression.

Additionally, we anticipate up to 3 meetings
with other agencies or stakeholder groups not
represented on the BPAC, to gather additional
relevant information.

Task 1.4 Quality Assurance
and Quality Control
At Fehr & Peers, we recognize that our technical
analysis is important, but so is the way the
methods and results are communicated, as well
as the process by which the work is reviewed for
quality assurance and control.

At the core of the QC process is a hierarchy of
staff that are responsible for various aspects of
each project. The following hierarchy may be
employed on any given project depending on the
project requirements and resources.

The Principal -in -Charge (PIC) provides oversight,
review, and strategic direction on the study as
necessary.

The Project Manager (PM) is responsible for
the overall quality of the study, and adherence to
schedule and budget. The PM is the primary point
of contact for the client.

The Project Engineer/Planner conducts the
technical calculations, prepares reports, and
supports the PM.

Experts are individuals that have considerable
experience on specific topics and are available to
collaborate on innovative solutions to a variety of
planning and operational problems.

Our Technical/Administrative Staff includes
individuals who prepare high -quality graphics,
process reports, set up conference calls, and
conduct other project -related activities as
necessary. This staff allows our engineers and
project managers to focus on the technical
analysis.

Quality control and quality assurance are
provided through structured internal review
processes, including review by the project team
and, when appropriate, review by staff external
to the core project team. Work quality will be
managed through detailed written work plans
based on Fehr & Peers' recommended practices
and senior staff review of all deliverables.

Task 1.5 Documentation
and Grant Compliance
Fehr & Peers has completed numerous projects
funded through the SB 821 program, and is
well versed in the grant eligibility requirements
and documentation needs for reimbursement.

Project progress and completion supporting
documentation will be provided.

TASK 1 DELIVERABLES
Meeting Agendas
Draft and Final Meeting Minutes
Documentation required for grant compliance
Task 2 - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Task 2.1 Review of Existing
Plans and Data
Fehr & Peers' recent transportation planning work
for the City of Beaumont, including the Mobility
Element of the Elevate Beaumont 2040 General
Plan Update and the 2024 Truck Route Study, as
well as the WRCOG Active Transportation Plan,
has provided Fehr & Peers a comprehensive
understanding of the transportation policy
landscape, existing plans, and available data,
not only within the City but also within the entire
western Riverside region. We will build on these
prior efforts, by identifying and documenting any
new or updated policies or plans relevant to this
project.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 11

The Fehr & Peers team is already familiar with
national and state best practices in active
transportation planning and complete streets
design and we will incorporate appropriate best
practices into the ATP.

Task 2.2 Existing Bicycle and
Pedestrian Facilities Inventory
For the Elevate Beaumont 2040 General Plan
Update, we inventoried the existing bicycle
network and identified a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Priority Network. We will build on this work,
identifying and mapping changes to the existing
network that have occurred within the past five
years.

Task 2.3 Field Review and
Reconnaissance
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory
created in Task 2.2 will be verified through a
combination of review of up-to-date aerial
imagery and field observation. Potential barriers
and constraints will be noted and documented
along the existing network.

Task 2.4 Safety and Traffic
Context Review
To analyze transportation safety within the City
of Beaumont, we will review the most recent five
years of publicly available crash data from the
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) at
UC Berkeley SafeTREC. Analysis will include injury
crashes of all modes, but will focus on crashes
involving people walking and biking. The resulting
safety analysis will identify factors common among
crashes in the City, particularly as pertains to
bicycle and pedestrian safety. This analysis will
consider factors such as:

Crash locations in relation to key walking and
bicycling destinations, such as parks, schools,
and entertainment areas.

Types of crashes, such as broadside and rear -
end.

Primary collision factors
Proximity to intersections,
Time of day
Presence of lighting
This analysis will generate graphs and charts of
common crash characteristics and a hot -spot map
of injury crash locations by mode.

Task 2.5 Connectivity and
Accessibility Analysis
We will overlay the existing bicycle and pedestrian
facility network with the crash analysis from
Task 2.4 and maps of key walking and bicycling
destinations such as schools, entertainment
centers and recreational facilities; and transit
routes and stops. This will allow us to identify
where barriers such as difficult roadway crossings,
geographical features, or network gaps exist.

TASK 2 DELIVERABLES
Existing Conditions Memorandum summarizing:

Existing plans and data review
Existing bicycle and pedestrian network
Field review findings
Crash and hot spot analysis
Connectivity analysis
Task 3 - Field
Review and
Constraints
Analysis
Task 3.1 Right -of -Way Review
and Feasibility Analysis
The ease with which bicycle and pedestrian
facility improvements can be made often rests
on the availability of sufficient existing pavement
width and rights -of -way. Acquiring additional
easements and rights -of -way can significantly
increase the cost and complexity of a roadway
project. The Fehr & Peers team will gather
available data sets to review roadway widths and
right-of-way easements for the transportation
network in Beaumont. We will use these to
determine locations where bicycle and pedestrian
improvements might be possible within the
existing corridor width, and locations where
acquiring additional easements or rights -of -way
12 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

may be required to move a proposed project
forward.

Task 3.2 Corridor and
Intersection Assessment
For key corridors and intersections, we will
conduct planning level assessments to determine
constraints that are likely to affect facility
implementation, such as geographic features that
limit the ability to widen a roadway or sidewalk,
difficult crossing conditions, and locations where
alternative design treatments may overcome these
limitations.

Task 3.3 Physical and
Operational Constraints
Preexisting infrastructure —such as utility
placement, drainage features, or other structures —
can also constrain the ability to implement bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. Contextual roadway
features such as vehicle speed, traffic volumes,
and multiple turn lanes can influence the types
of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is
appropriate and implementable. These can also
affect construction costs and schedules. Fehr &
Peers will identify and document these potential
barriers and constraints along key corridors.

Task 3.4 Planning Level ADA and
Accessibility Considerations
Accessibility considerations related to potential
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, such as
the existence and placement of ADA-compliant
curb ramps, and steeps grades can impact the
types of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that can
be implemented. Fehr & Peers will identify and
document these considerations at a planning level.

TASK 3 DELIVERABLES
Technical Memorandum summarizing the
findings from Tasks 3.1 through 3.4
Supporting maps and exhibits, as necessary,
to illustrate the findings summarized in the
Technical Memo
Task 4 - Policy,
Plan, and
Standards Review
Task 4.1 Review of City
Plans and Policies
The Fehr & Peers team will review the City of
Beaumont Plans and Policies identified in Task 2.1.

Our review will consider the following factors:

Support of safety and active transportation in
City infrastructure
Requirements for including safety and active
transportation in new development
Engagement with and education of the
community in support of safety and active
transportation
Historic (last five years) and planned funding
for projects and programs to improve roadway
safety and increase walking and biking
Alignment with the Safe System Approach
Task 4.2 Review of Regional
and State Guidance
Regional and state plans and guidance for bicycle
and pedestrian planning include the WRCOG
Active Transportation Plan developed by Fehr
& Peers, Alta Planning and Raimi + Associates
in 2018, the Southern California Association of
Governments' (SCAG) Connect SoCal 2024
Plan, and Caltrans documents "Toward an Active
California" and the Highway Design Manual. We
will review regional and state -level bicycle and
pedestrian planning documents with a focus on
alignment between City plans and policies and
state and regional priorities, particularly as they are reflected in potential funding sources.

Task 4.3 Review of Design
Standards and Guidelines
The Fehr & Peers team is well informed on state
and national design standards for bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, including the national Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, llth Edition
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 13

Revision 1 (MUTCD), effective December 2025,
the California MUTCD effective in January 2026,
the AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and
Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, 2nd Edition
(2021), the AASHTO Guide for the Development
of Bicycle Facilities, 5th Edition (2024) and the
NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2025). These
plans will be reviewed for their applicability to the
Beaumont context to inform project -level designs
for bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the City.

Task 4.4 Policy Consistency
Assessment
Consistency between the policies and guidelines
reviewed in Tasks 4.1 through 4.3 will be assessed
as they pertain to the goals defined for this
new Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, as
developed through this planning process. Any
inconsistencies will be catalogued in this task, and
recommendations for reconciling them will be
included in the Final Plan.

TASK 4 DELIVERABLES
Technical Memorandum documenting findings
from the plan and policy review, with summary
tables
Task 5 - Bicycle
and Pedestrian
Network
Development
Task 5.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Network Framework
The Mobility Element of the Elevate Beaumont
2040 General Plan used a layered approach
to develop a network that meets the needs
of all roadway users. We will build off of this
contextual understanding of which modes should
be prioritized on which streets, and consider
additional elements such as proximity to bicycle
and pedestrian destinations and generators such
as schools and parks, roadway widths, speeds and
constraints, safety considerations, modifications
recommended in the recent Truck Route Study,
industrial development in the southwest part of the
City, and the City's assessment of the downtown
area of 6th Street. We believe that a framework
for developing a complete bicycle and pedestrian
network that takes all of these considerations into
account will best serve the City of Beaumont.

Task 5.2 Connectivity and Access
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Network developed
for this Plan should be prioritized to serve the
destinations people want to access most via active
transportation modes. These destinations will be
identified by the Community and Stakeholder
Engagement tasks, but generally include schools,
parks, entertainment destinations, neighborhood
services and transit stops. The Connectivity and
Accessibility Analysis performed in Task 2.4 will
form the basis for this task to ensure that priority is given to closing gaps in connectivity from housing
areas to these destinations.

Task 5.3 Safety -Driven
Network Development
When people do not feel safe and comfortable
using active transportation modes, they often
opt for vehicular travel. While not always the
case, high -crash corridors and intersections
will be avoided by bicyclists and pedestrians,
and represent barriers to choosing active travel.

Building on the hot -spot map created in Task 2.4,
we will identify a high -injury network (HIN). The
resulting safety analysis will identify intersections
and corridors within the city with high rates of
serious crashes. This network will be prioritized
based on a system of factor weighting we will
develop in collaboration with the BPAC. Common
weight considerations include injury severity,
bicyclist or pedestrian involvement, children and
older adults, and proximity to schools and parks.

Task 5.4 Corridor Prioritization
and Phasing
The primary purpose of this task will be to
prioritize the top corridors or intersections for
interventions that will be developed further in
Task 6. We will create a prioritization framework
based on the high -injury network developed in
Task 5.3, combined with other priorities the City
wishes to include. Examples of characteristics
that can be used in the prioritization methodology
14 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

are key locations for pedestrian and bicycle trip
generators, and locations that would increase
network connectivity or reduce gaps and barriers.

This methodology will be used to prioritize
locations and develop recommended facility
concepts and designs for the network. We
will examine factors like context, street and
intersection configurations, and national, state, and
local guidance. Recommendations will be stratified
using the FHWA's Safe System Roadway Design
Hierarchy (FHWA-SA-22-069).

SAFE SYSTEM

ROADWAY DESIGN

HIERARCHY

TIER REMOVE SEVERE
1 CONFLICTS
1MM

TIER REDUCE VEHICLE
2 SPEEDS
EMI
TIER
3 MANAGE CONFLICTS

IN TIME

TIER INCREASE ATTENTIVENESS
4 AND AWARENESS
Task 5.5 Planning -Level
Cost Considerations
The Fehr & Peers team will develop planning level
cost considerations for the facility concepts and
designs developed in Task 5.4.

TASK 5 DELIVERABLES
Draft Bicycle Network maps and exhibits
Summary of corridor prioritization and phasing
Technical Memorandum documenting network
development, phasing, and recommendations
Task 6 -
Conceptual
Design and Plan
Development
Task 6.1 Conceptual
Design Development
The Fehr & Peers team will develop recommended
conceptual designs for the top 5 priority corridors
or locations identified in Task 5. Recommended
designs will be based on context, priority modes
identified for each corridor, and technical
feasibility. Priority corridors and locations will be
sorted by facility classification and priority mode.

Cross sections will be developed for each facility
type, depicting average right-of-way width and
proposed configurations that show travel lanes,
parking, shoulders, curb/gutter, sidewalk and bike
path, and other amenities. These designs will
optimize the street for all modes of travel, with
consideration given to priority modes identified for
each network street.

Cross sections and conceptual designs will
be illustrated in a manner to help the public
understand the vision and engage with the
planning process. Concepts will be presented in
the second round of Community Engagement to
gauge community comfort with and enthusiasm for
different facility types and cross sections.

Task 6.2 Mapping and Exhibits
Fehr & Peers will create maps depicting the
planned pedestrian and bicycle network by
existing roadway classification and priority mode
for each corridor, recommended facility types,
and proposed implementation phase. We will
also provide maps showing how the existing and
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 15

proposed networks connect to key destinations
and publicly owned lands such as parks, schools,
and neighborhood services. Draft network maps
will be prepared and revised based on the second
round of community engagement and one round
of comments from the City and BPAC.

TASK 6 DELIVERABLES
Conceptual design exhibits and typical cross
sections
Draft and Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan maps
Task 7 -
Community and
Stakeholder
Engagement
At Fehr & Peers, we center community feedback as
one of the most important components in creating
and improving healthy, sustainable communities.

We will provide equitable public outreach,
generating insightful feedback and meaningful
recommendations, to provide the most
comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan for the City of Beaumont. This is an exciting
opportunity to partner with the City in creating a
safe and accessible active transportation system
that embraces classic and new forms of mobility,
as it connects users across Beaumont's "rustic,
rural beauty, and charm."
Our public outreach strategy will employ diverse
types of engagement initiatives aimed at raising
project awareness and capturing feedback across
a wide range of stakeholders. This approach
enables the City to provide a Final Plan that
reflects community -wide values and aspirations.

Task 7.1 Community
Engagement Strategy
The goal of this engagement strategy is to
connect with as comprehensive a cross section of
community members as possible, over a 15 -month
timeframe. We aim to reach residents and small
business owners, families and bike enthusiasts,
and those who walk, run, or roll for transportation
or enjoyment. We will engage with community
members of varying ages (young and old alike)
and mobility levels. With growth in the housing and
warehouse sectors of the City, we will also aim to
reach incoming residents, workforce populations,
warehouse owners, and property developers.

City and elected officials will continue to play a
role in providing critical and strategic feedback
that shapes a safe, successful, and sustainable
Plan. Fehr & Peers will work closely with the City
of Beaumont to tailor this list of stakeholders to
ensure we connect with the right organizations.

Task 7.2 Public Outreach Activities
Creating and hosting compelling, interactive, and
convenient public outreach activities will help
attract feedback through both in -person and
online mediums. It is important to create hands-on
initiatives and events to ensure public awareness
and education about the Plan, while simultaneously
fostering community ownership and buy -in. We will
have activities that are meaningful and convenient
for the community, to ensure as much participation
as possible.

We will work with the City to create two public
outreach surveys that collect measurable data,
informing a numbers -based Plan. These surveys
will be the backbone of our public outreach
strategy and will be launched first at the start
of outreach, and then toward the later months
of outreach, allowing them to run alongside
stakeholder meetings and public outreach events,
as we move across the 15 -month timeline. These
surveys will be deployed online so that they are
always accessible and convenient for participants,
while being easily administered at in -person
meetings or events.

The first survey will focus on how community
members use the current bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure, giving them an opportunity to talk
about barriers to using the existing system, while
identifying specific areas of concern through an
interactive map. The second survey will build
off the findings from the first survey and will be
deployed during the second half of the timeline.

As the public outreach process gains momentum,
Fehr & Peers staff will expand outreach efforts
by hosting 6 pop-up events across the City at
established community gatherings like Beaumont
16 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Nights or the annual Lavendar Festival. At these
pop-up events attendees can learn about City's
goals and vision for the project, supported by
posters that highlight current and future active
transportation routes and paths. Posters will also
provide visual examples of bike and pedestrian
facilities to help attendees create a vision for what
they would like to see implemented in the City.

Attendees will then be able to vote on each facility
type by placing a green dot on the poster. This will
create a visual representation of the infrastructure
community members agree on. Finally, everyone
will be encouraged to take the online survey at the
pop-up event, or will be given a reminder card to
fill out the survey at a more convenient time. These
pop -ups create an opportunity to engage with
a wide and diverse range of stakeholders during
events around the city.

Digital and print communication materials will
support all outreach initiatives across the course
of the engagement process. Themes focused on
active transportation and lifestyles, bicycle and
pedestrian safety, and community empowerment
and awareness will be employed to underscore
the City's commitment to "abundant recreational
opportunities and rich community life."
We will create materials that bring awareness to
the project, educate people on the Master Plan,
direct people to the online survey, and invite
the community to the interactive engagement
workshop. Social media campaigns that utilize the
City's accounts across Instagram, Facebook, and
Linkedln will complement this approach.

Printed materials such as posters and postcards
will be created to place in businesses and anchor
institutions around the City. Digital announcements
will be posted in local online information platforms
like Nextdoor. By creating a comprehensive
communication strategy, we ensure that the
public outreach process stays top of mind with the
community as a whole.

Task 7.3 Stakeholder Coordination
Coordinating with key stakeholders, such as
WRCOG, school districts, transit providers, and
council members will help gather feedback
and recommendations rooted in the strategic
and functional reality of Beaumont. We will
work directly with the City to curate this list of
stakeholders, then engage them through in -
person and virtual listening sessions, and phone
calls where necessary. Throughout this process
we will document all responses, generating a
holistic foundation of feedback from a variety of
contributors.

Task 7.4 Documentation
of Public Input
Throughout the public outreach process, we will
collect quantitative and qualitative data that will
inform the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan,
through both analysis of numerical measurements
and context -rich feedback. We will prepare a
report that describes the entire public outreach
process, summarizes all feedback, and identifies
themes, concerns, and recommendations
that emerge from analyzing community and
stakeholder feedback. This information will be
presented in a clear, straightforward way to help
inform and construct the City's updated Plan. We
will draft an initial report on engagement efforts
and results for the City for review. The finalized
engagement report will be included in the Final
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as an appendix.

TASK 7 DELIVERABLES
Community Engagement Plan
Pop-up Event Materials
Online surveys (2)
Summary of public and stakeholder input and
responses
Documentation suitable for inclusion in the Draft
and Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Task 8 - Final
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Master Plan
Task 8.1 Draft Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan
Fehr & Peers will compile summaries, technical
memos and exhibits from previous tasks into a
Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. This
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 17

Draft will include maps, tables, images, and text
based on these prior deliverables, using graphic
elements and layout for reading comprehension
both online and in print. The Plan itself will be
focused on key needs, messages, and deliverables
for use by City staff, elected officials, and the
public. Supporting data will be provided in
appendices.

The Draft Plan will be provided to the project team
and the BPAC for one round of comments.

Task 8.2 Implementation Strategy
Fehr & Peers will create an implementation
strategy to drive construction of walking and
biking projects; rollout of non -infrastructure
programs; and ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and
adjustment of these programs and improvements.

This program will include the following:

Identification of prioritized (high/medium/low
priority) projects stratified by short-, medium -
and long-term implementation actions
Planning -level cost estimates and potential
funding sources and strategies to support grant
applications
Identification of next steps and potential project
partners to advance projects to design and
implementation phases.

Task 8.3 Final Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan
Comments received from the BPAC and City staff
will be reviewed and incorporated in the Final Plan
as appropriate. Comments and resolutions will be
documented in tabular form and provided with the
Final Plan.

Task 8.4 City Council
Presentation and Approval
An executive summary and presentation of
the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will be
prepared and presented to the Beaumont City
Council by the Fehr & Peers team. All deliverables
and supporting materials will be compiled and
provided in digital format to the City.

TASK 8 DELIVERABLES
Draft Bicycle Master Plan
Final Bicycle Master Plan
Executive summary document
City Council presentation
Digital deliverables and supporting files
Task 9 - Project
Closeout and Grant
Documentation
Task 9.1 Final Review and Approvals
Final City Council comments will be addressed by
Fehr & Peers staff, and we will work with City staff
to obtain approval of the Final Plan.

Task 9.2 Grant
Documentation Support
The Fehr & Peers team will provide documentation
as required for grant reimbursement as
documented in the SB 821 grant guidelines and
agreement.

Task 9.3 Project Closeout
Fehr & Peers will confirm the completion of all
tasks in the project scope, provide final copies of
all project deliverables, and attend a close-out
meeting with City staff if requested.

TASK 9 DELIVERABLES
Final approved Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan and supporting documentation
Project closeout summary
Grant documentation support materials, as
requested
Optional Tasks
Fehr & Peers would like to suggest several optional
tasks that we believe will increase community
acceptance of the Plan, and strengthen the benefit
of recommended safety countermeasures.
18 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Optional Task 1: - Community
Walk Audits
Walk audits are versatile tools for pedestrian
planning efforts. They can increase public
engagement with the planning process, build
awareness of pedestrian design, and identify safety
issues specific to walking. Walk audits are both
educational for the participating members, as
well as an excellent method to gather community
input on specific, high -profile corridors. They can
be particularly effective for generating support
when conducted with elected officials or high-level
City decision -makers. Fehr & Peers recommends
conducting community or decision -maker walk
audits for the top two locations identified in Task

5. For this task, Fehr & Peers staff would lead the
audits and provide documentation of the process
and outcomes. The information collected would be
added to the Community Engagement data, and
used to determine effective, community -approved
countermeasures.

Optional Task 2 — Common
Crash Profiles Involving
Bicyclists or Pedestrians
For this task, Fehr & Peers would perform
a systemic analysis of different factors that
contribute to crashes, with the goal of identifying
common crash profiles involving bicyclists or
pedestrians in the City of Beaumont. Used with
GIS data, crash profiles can be used to determine
where bicycle or pedestrian crashes may be
expected to occur in the future, even if those
locations have not yet experienced collisions These
profiles would then be used to determine what
countermeasures will be most effective in reducing
injury crashes, and where on the identified network
they could be used to greatest effect.
000
o
•
Optional Task 3 — Detailed Concept
Designs and Cost Estimates
For this task, Fehr & Peers would prepare detailed
concept designs and cost estimates for up
to three of the top -ranked projects identified
through the network development and corridor
prioritization efforts. Projects that have more in-
depth design and cost estimating are more likely
to be successful when applying for implementation
funding.

Optional Task 4 — Grant Support
Fehr & Peers' staff are experienced grant writers,
helping clients secure over $150 million in safety
planning and implementation funding in the
past 10 years, including $116 million in SS4A
implementation funding. Fehr & Peers also has
helped secure over $32 million in HSIP funding,
over $570 million in federal funding, and a total
of over $969 million for clients throughout the
country.

For this task, Fehr & Peers would help Beaumont
craft compelling grant narratives that communicate
the context and a clear purpose and need to the
reviewers. Project descriptions will highlight the
unique aspects of the project while staying within
the funding agency's guidance. We will produce
visual aids supported by the data and analysis
completed through this planning effort. This task
was estimated at approximately 54 hours. The
number of projects/grants that can be addressed
will be dependent on complexity of the project and
type of funding being applied for.

Optional Task 5 — Addendum
to the General Plan
This Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan represents
a continuation of work begun during the
development of the Mobility Element of the Elevate
Beaumont 2040 General Plan Update. As such, we
have an opportunity to strengthen the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan by amending the General
Plan to integrate the final bicycle and pedestrian
network resulting from this project into the goals,
priorities and policies of the General Plan. Robust
integration with the General Plan can help both
garner public support for projects and obtain grant
support for implementation.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 19

F. Approach
Fehr & Peers considers each potential assignment
carefully, and only pursues projects to which we
can commit the appropriate time, effort, and
resources to provide excellent services. We are
able to offer a dedicated team for this project and
can supplement it as needed from our large pool
of resources. Our approach to each project we
commit to includes the following:

Ongoing Communication
with City Staff
Fehr & Peers understands that collaboration and
open communication lead to successful, high -
quality, on -time and on -budget projects. We
prioritize setting clear expectations and creating
open channels of communication from the start.

We remain in continual communication with our
clients throughout each project and have a proven
record of success working as a team with the City
of Beaumont.

Defined Expectations
Fehr & Peers will work with City staff to identify
expectations at project onset. By communicating
clearly from the beginning, we can create a
schedule and budget that will work for Beaumont.

Overcoming Challenges
We are aware that however well expectations are
defined at the outset of a project, circumstances
may change. Challenges can arise due to a range
of issues including tight schedules, limited budget
resources, neighborhood controversy/opposition,
and interactions with adjacent agencies. Fehr &
Peers has successfully dealt with each of these
issues on prior projects. We can respond to tight
schedules by reassigning staff. We can tailor our
scope of work to meet budget expectations. We
can adjust our engagement approach to address
neighborhood concerns.
20 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

We strive to remain nimble, so that we are able
to adjust our study approach, call upon additional
resources when necessary, and address other
potential issues as they arise.

Delivering On Schedule
Before a project begins, we analyze and forecast
the time and resources needed to complete project
deliverables by their scheduled due date. Workload
is managed on a weekly basis to ensure sufficient
progress is made based on schedule commitments.

Project managers meet weekly to plan staff loading
and resolve any potential conflicts with project
commitments.

Cost Control/
Managing Budget
Fehr & Peers relies on a state-of-the-art project
management system, the Deltek VantagePoint
platform, which provides on-line, real-time cost
and budget status. This information is used to
generate weekly and monthly progress reports.

These monthly reports are provided with each
invoice and include comparisons of project budget
spent versus workload complete.

Communicating with Other
Stakeholders and the Public
With frequent multi -agency coordination
experience from numerous projects, and our
experience in multiple jurisdictions, we understand
the demands and sometimes competing interests
of stakeholders on planning and engineering
projects. Our initial proposed designs and planning
solutions take into account agency requirements,
national best practices, and the local context,
thereby minimizing controversy when initially
reviewed by stakeholders and affected community
members during the planning phase. We
understand, however, that public and stakeholder
concerns can still arise. These can be alleviated
through in-depth knowledge of the area, photos
documenting conditions, micro -simulation, clear
communication, and listening with empathy to truly
understand the needs and concerns of affected
community members and stakeholders.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 21

Project Schedule 2026
Project Start Date: June 2026
Jun
L
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Tasks
__
Task 1 - Project Management

1.1 Project Initiation

1.2 Project Schedule and Management

1.3 Meetings and Coordination

1.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

1.5 Documentation and Grant Compliance
Task 2 - Existing Conditions Analysis

2.1 Review of Existing Plans and Data

2.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory

2.3 Field Review and Reconnaissance

2.4 Safety and Traffic Context Review

2.5 Connectivity and Accessibility Analysis
Task 3 - Field Review and Constraints Analysis

3.1 Right -of -Way Review and Feasibility Analysis

3.2 Corridor and Intersection Assessment

3.3 Physical and Operational Constraints

3.4 Planning -Level ADA and Accessibility Considerations Task 4 - Policy, Plan, and Standards Review

4.1 Review of City Plans and Policies

4.2 Review of Regional and State Guidance

4.3 Review of Design Standards and Guidelines

4.4 Policy Consistency Assessment
Task 5 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Development

5.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Framework

5.2 Connectivity and Access

5.3 Safety -Driven Network Development

5.4 Corridor Prioritization and Phasing

5.5 Planning -Level Cost Considerations
Task 6 - Conceptual Design and Plan Development

6.1 Conceptual Design Development

6.2 Mapping and Exhibits
Task 7 - Community and Stakeholder Engagement

7.1 Community Engagement Strategy

7.2 Public Outreach Activities

7.3 Stakeholder Coordination

7.4 Documentation of Public Input
Task 8 - Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.1 Draft Bicycle Master Plan

8.2 Implementation Strategy

8.3 Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.4 City Council Presentation and Approval
Task 9 - Project Closeout and Grant Documentation

9.1 Final Review and Approvals

9.2 Grant Documentation Support

9.3 Project Closeout
C
S
22 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

2027
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct
Notes and Major Deliverables
B
B = BPAC Meeting
2 = All Task 2 Deliverables
3 = All Task 3 Deliverables
4 = All Task 4 Deliverables
5 5 = All Task 5 Deliverables
D
6 D = Draft Master Plan Maps, 6 = All Task 6 Deliverables C = Community Engagement Plan
S
S = Summaries of Public Input and Responses
D
D = Documentation for Inclusion in the Master Plan
D
D = Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
F
F = Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
8 D = All Remaining Task 8 Deliverables
9 9 = All Task 9 Deliverables
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 23

G. Additional Information
Requested Contract Changes
If awarded this contract, Fehr & Peers hopes to be able to negotiate a contract with the City that has similar terms to what was agreed upon in our On -Call Agreement between the City and Fehr & Peers, dated February 7, 2023, including a comparable indemnification obligation. We believe this approach serves the best interests of both parties, as the previously established terms ensure that our insurance will protect the City in the event of a claim.
24 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

H. References

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ATP
FEBRUARY 2021 - OCTOBER 2024
Fehr & Peers led the development of County of
Santa Barbara's first Active Transportation Plan,
engaging communities across unincorporated
areas to develop a prioritized set of policies
and more than 35 pedestrian and bicycle
improvements that support safer, more sustainable
everyday travel. Services included data analysis,
safety analysis, community engagement,
conceptual design, cost estimating and grant
support.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Mark Friedlander
Active Transportation Manager
County of Santa Barbara Public Works,
Transportation Division
(805) 568-3576
[email protected]

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
LRSP
JANUARY 2022 - NOVEMBER 2022
Fehr & Peers developed a Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) focused on County maintained roadways
within unincorporated San Bernardino County.

We used a dual -pronged approach: 1) identifying
priority systemic safety improvement projects
based on high -risk roadway features that are
correlated with fatal and severe collision types, and
2) reviewing collision trends to develop behavioral
countermeasures. The plan also included
stakeholder engagement, the development of six
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant
applications for the County under a constrained
timeline, and helped the County secure millions of
dollars in funding for project implementation.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Noel Castillo, P.E.

Deputy Director - Transportation
Department of Public Works
[email protected]
Phone: 909-387-7916
825 E. Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 25

•

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
•
N

WRCOG ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PLAN
NOVEMBER 2016 - JULY 2018
Fehr & Peers led the team preparing the Western
Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Active
Transportation Plan (ATP). This included obtaining
and reviewing relevant planning documents;
establishing a working group to engage a broad
section of stakeholders; and developing a
survey instrument and survey methodology to
determine the sub region's general needs, values
and concerns surrounding walking, bicycling,
and transit. The existing conditions analysis also
included collision analysis; economic indicators;
and data on key health topics including obesity
rates, physical activity rates, chronic diseases
affected by air quality and physical activity
(including asthma, coronary diseases, and cancer),
and mortality rates. The final ATP included
priority projects as well as goals, objectives, and
performance metrics for the implementation of the
plan.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Christopher Tzeng
Program Manager
Western Riverside Council of Governments
[email protected]
951.405.6711
ct. Lr. eerwhac Cooney AMe hmP aum Mama, Ormi
• t.e •nt S*kamt to knee. lSRl ! Sake, .o.: .+i i.JO rake O.+Wk t-s.em y Bike Fariliutk Safe Bike Caws: Data(lrannekouse Bicycle Haw* 1,304 45
Gke Casey.
roe and Day
•µ8.,t. 151 AM
130% 1t 54 AN
Toro And Grr wy
Collision severity
kt`�M 111111111111111111111
Caryyra
dPan
• 306-SS9AY MAO -859M
O ka. 249
•3W SSe"
6 106 kW
•No. •.
169
o
O o p p
11;
Akohaltrwelml
°•
•
®o
me
©°m ••
00 ° o •"•
° ° O e
° D ° • ° 0
9 o ,

SBCTA ATP PROJECT

PRIORITIZATION AND GRANT

SUPPORT
APRIL 2023 - JUNE 2024
Fehr & Peers developed a methodology to evaluate
and prioritize proposed bicycle, pedestrian
and safe routes to school projects across San
Bernardino County. This included stakeholder
outreach and the development of a web -based
tool to collect stakeholder and agency input and
to present the final rankings. Fehr & Peers also
supported the development of four ATP grant
applications.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Ginger Koblasz
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA)
(909) 884-8276
[email protected]
1170 W 3rd Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410 US
26 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ATP/SAFE ROUTES TO

SCHOOL PLAN
JULY 2022 - JULY 2023
Fehr & Peers developed an APA-award winning
school -focused active transportation plan for
Rancho Cucamonga. Services included data
analysis, safety analysis, community engagement,
conceptual design, cost estimating and grant
support.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Justine Garcia
City of Rancho Cucamonga
(909) 774-2046

CORONA COMPLETE

STREETS SAFETY

ASSESSMENT
JUNE 2021 — ONGOING
Fehr & Peers provides peer review of
transportation impact studies for the City
to ensure consistency with adopted SB 743
thresholds and traffic impact study guidelines,
documenting findings through technical
memoranda.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Rosie Ureno
City Traffic Engineer
(951) 817-5708
[email protected]
400 South Vicentia Avenue
Corona, CA 92882

WESTMINSTER GARDEN

GROVE BOULEVARD

CYCLE TRACK & LRSP
AUGUST 2016 - JANUARY 2018
& JANUARY 2021 - ONGOING
Fehr & Peers previously supported the City of
Westminster by evaluating a potential cycle
track along Garden Grove Boulevard. We are
currently developing the City's Local Road
Safety Plan, using a data -driven approach to
identify priority projects and strategies that
improve safety for all roadway users.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Adolfo Ozaeta
Assistant City Manager
City of Westminster
8200 Westminster Blvd
Westminster CA 92683
(714) 548-3462
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 27

u)
G
N
ce
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 29

Fehr& Peers
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 1999
Registrations
Licensed Traffic Engineer
(TR2402)
Years of Experience
Total: 26 years
With Fehr & Peers: 26 years
Affiliations
Association of Environmental
Professional (AEP)
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
American Planning Association
(APA)
Urban Land Institute (ULI)
Recognitions
WTS Honorable Ray LaHood
Award Winner (Man of the
Year) — IE Chapter, 2023
Presentations
VMT-Related:
• 2023 UCLA Land Use Law
and Policy
• 2022 National APA
• 2022 Western ITE
• 2022 CEAC Public Works
Officers Institute
• 2022 SBCOG City/County
• 2019 California APA
• 2019 CSU Facilities
Jason D. Pack, PE
Principal I Principal -in -Charge
About
Jason is a Principal at Fehr & Peers in Southern California, where he blends deep technical expertise with forward -thinking leadership. In addition to managing a wide range of transportation projects, Jason spearheads the firm's research and development initiatives in emergency evacuation assessment —helping communities plan for the unexpected.

With a strong foundation in travel demand forecasting, traffic operations (including micro -simulation), VMT and big data analysis, and transit ridership forecasting, Jason excels at translating complex data into actionable insights. He is a trusted advisor to clients navigating the evolving landscape of NEPA and CEQA transportation impact studies.

Jason's recent work includes leading mobility analyses for major infrastructure projects, guiding SB 743 implementation strategies including helping agencies establish VMT banks and exchanges, and supporting compliance with California's latest evacuation planning mandates (SB 99 and AB 747). Whether shaping future - focused transportation policies or solving today's toughest mobility challenges, Jason is driven by a mission to make smarter, safer, and more sustainable communities a reality.

Relevant Project Experience
City of Beaumont Experience
Jason has completed a wide variety of over 20 projects for the City of Beaumont in California, including:
• Beaumont General Plan Circulation Element
• Beaumont Peer Review Services
• Pennsylvania Avenue Grade SEP
• Beaumont South of SR 60 Roadway Nexus Study
• I-10 and Oak Valley Parkway PAED
• Beaumont Truck Route Study
• Beaumont 6th Street Revitalization Test
• Beaumont Gorgonio Professional Center Peer Review
• Beaumont Highland Springs at 6th Street Signal Timing • Beaumont Marketplace at Oak Valley Peer Review
• Beaumont Noble Creek Vista Peer Review
• Beaumont Truck Route & Parking Ordinance
• Beaumont Oak Valley Village TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont Mustang Trip Gen Peer Review
• Beaumont Heights Business Peer Review
• Beaumont San Jacinto Peer Review
• Beaumont Lilac Center TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont 79 North Center TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont Pointe TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont Orchard Logistics Peer Review
• Beaumont Legacy Peer Review
30 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr& Peers
Presentations (cont.)
Future of Transportation:
• 2018 SBCTA City/County
• 2017 WRCOG Planning
Parking:
• 2018 OC Planning Directors
Emergency Evacuation
• 2022 National APA
• 2022 California APA
Multimodal LOS
• ULI SCIC
• I-10 Pennsylvania Avenue Support
Specific Plans/Master Plans/Corridor Plans
Jason has completed assessments for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. Key projects are identified below:
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan, Anaheim, CA
• MAG High Capacity Transit Corridors Sustainability Study, Phoenix, CA • RTC of Southern Nevada High Capacity Transit Study, Las Vegas, CA • Long Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan, Long Beach, CA • Cal Poly Pomona Master Plan
• Holt Boulevard Corridor Plan, Ontario, CA
• High Speed Rail Access Study, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
• HART District Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
• Wine Country Community Plan, Riverside County, CA
• CollegeTown Specific Plan, Fullerton, CA
• Mall Specific Plan, Westminster CA
• The Resort/Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, CA • Bus Rapid Transit TOD Overlay Study, San Bernardino, CA Design Studies
Jason has taught complete streets design for UC Berkeley Technology Transfer, Caltrans, and LA Metro; but has also been involved in a variety of design -related studies. These design focused efforts are described below:
• Foothill Boulevard — Rancho Cucamonga
• Haven Avenue — Rancho Cucamonga
• LRSP Corridor Safety Enhancements
• Montclair
• Westminster
• Lake Elsinore
• Downtown Roseville
• Downtown Victorville
• Adalanto Specific Plan
• The Resort Specific Plan
• Cal Poly Pomona Transit Lane
• Cal Poly Pomona Bikeway Project
• Fullerton Bikeway Connection Study
• San Jose Bicycle Freeway Corridor Study
• Holt Boulevard BRT Corridor Concept Design
• Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan Complete Street Concepts • Carlsbad Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategies (CATS) Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 31

Fehr&Peers
Education
Master of Public Health —
Policy and Management,
University of Arizona,
Tucson AZ (2022)
Master of Science —
Urban Planning,
University of Arizona,
Tucson AZ (2007)
Graduate Certificate —
Sustainable Tourism,
Arizona State University,
Tempe AZ (2016)
Bachelor of Science —
Psychology,
Northern Arizona University,
Flagstaff AZ, (1999)
Registrations
American Institute of Certified
Planners (#34532)
Road Safety Professional
Level 1 (#1132)
Level 2 - Behavioral (#29)
Years of Experience
Total: 22 years
With Fehr & Peers: 1 year
Affiliations
American Planning Association
(APA)
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Presentations
Vulnerable Road User Planning
and Design Tools — ASCE
National Conference (2023)
Lost in Translation: Bridging the
Communication Gap Between
Transportation and Public
Health — AZ APA (2023)
Donna C. Lewandowski, AICP, RSP2B
Associate Transportation Planner I Project Manager
About
Donna has over two decades of experience working at the intersection of transportation and public health. She is a certified Level 2 Road Safety Professional in the behavioral discipline, and brings perspectives from public health, sustainability and human behavior to her transportation planning projects. Donna has significant program and project management experience and has secured over two dozen federal grant awards in both the transportation and public health fields.

She has served on NCHRP Research Project Panels and provided technical assistance on National Institute of Health grant panels.

Donna has worked for both state and county governments, giving her a thorough knowledge of agency processes and requirements. She excels in public presentations, engaging with diverse stakeholders, decision -makers and the media.

Relevant Project Experience
Complete Streets Safety Assessment (Riverside, CA)
Project Manager. Donna led interviews with local staff to understand their safety concerns for the corridors, reviewed historic collision data to understand key safety issues, and completed field visit safety and walking audits. The final summary report included project recommendations with conceptual designs of proposed improvements in a 10 -mile long corridor in Riverside.

Complete Streets Safety Assessment (Corona, CA)
Project Manager. Donna led interviews with local staff to understand their safety concerns for the corridors, reviewed historic collision data to understand key safety issues, and completed field visit safety and walking audits. The final summary report included project recommendations with conceptual designs of proposed improvements in two key corridors and a key intersection in Corona.

Safe Routes to School Study (La Habra, CA)
Project Manager. Donna is leading the development of a Safe Routes to School Study for 15 schools across urban and suburban areas. For each school, the team will conduct walk audits and detailed collision analyses using state and local data.

The final report will identify infrastructure improvements that enhance safety and position the City for future grant funding opportunities.

Complete Streets Safety Assessment (Tustin, CA)
Project Manager. Donna led interviews with local staff to understand their safety concerns for the corridors, reviewed historic collision data to understand key safety issues, and completed field visit safety and walking audits. The final summary report included project recommendations with conceptual designs of proposed improvements in two key corridors in Tustin.

Providence Mission Hospital Safety Mobility Study (Mission Viejo, CA) Project Manager. Donna led the development of a safety and mobility study for the hospital campus. Steps included a close analysis of crash reports over a two-year period; two campus field visits to assess the circulation, signage, and roadway 32 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr&Peers
Presentations (cont.)
Bottom -up and Top -down:

Addressing walking and
bicycling in rural areas through
a health lens - APBP (2022)
markings; development of recommendations to improve pedestrian and vehicle safety; and creation of a slide deck to communicate the study steps and results.

SS4A Vision Zero and Safety Action Plan (Glendale, AZ)
Project Manager. Donna is leading the crash analysis and creation of a high -injury network, and leading several components of the final product: development of a Vision Zero Plan and a Neighborhood Safety Plan, and a Speed Study. Additionally, she assisted in the development and execution of a visioning workshop.

Local Road Safety Plan, Scottsdale Road (Scottsdale, AZ)* Behavioral Safety Specialist. Donna led a Road Safety Assessment for a 6 -lane mixed -use arterial roadway. The analysis included a 5 -year crash analysis, field observations, a multi -jurisdictional Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) analysis to determine the cumulative effect of multiple TIAs in the corridor, and interviews with staff from transportation, police, and fire to better understand the safety concerns.

In addition to infrastructure and programmatic recommendations, the final report included policy and implementation actions to incorporate safety analysis into TIA requirements.

Road Safety Assessment, SR89A from Robert Road to the Base of Mingus Mountain (Prescott Valley, AZ)*
Behavioral Safety Specialist. Donna led a Road Safety Assessment for an 8 -mile segment of a two-lane rural highway. The analysis included a 5 -year crash analysis, field observations, and interviews with staff from transportation, police, and fire to better understand the safety concerns in the corridor. Analysis was completed separately for the corridor and one major intersection. The final report included infrastructure and programmatic recommendations, to increase safety throughout the corridor.

Safe Routes to School Plan (Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, AZ)* Lead Planner. Donna led the planning process, reviewing the vehicular pick-up and drop-off circulation plan, and assessing bicycle and pedestrian connectivity with the surrounding neighborhoods. The plan recommended physical improvements around the school and programmatic recommendations for all 6 SRTS E's, a walking and biking route map, and a funding and implementation plan.

Statewide Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment (Colorado Department of Transportation)*
Lead Planner. Donna was responsible for performing an equity analysis to identify high -risk areas and populations; interpreting the results of qualitative and quantitative analyses; identifying and analyzing related plans within Colorado and its policy peer states; and conducting consultations with representatives of identified high -risk populations. The final VRU report was completed using a Safe System Approach.

SS4A Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (Waterloo, IA)*
Project Manager. Donna led the development of an SS4A-compliant Safety Action Plan for the downtown area, which included a vulnerable immigrant population. The data -driven analysis resulted in recommendations for both location -specific and systemic countermeasures to increase the safety of all roadway users. *Work performed before joining Fehr & Peers
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 33

Fehr& Peers
Education
Master of Urban Planning,
University of California, Los
Angeles, 2003
Bachelor of Arts, International
Relations Florida State
University, 1998
Years of Experience
Total: 23 years
With Fehr & Peers: 13 years
Presentations
Bring Your Curb Enthusiasm!
Introducing ITE's new
Curbside Management
Practitioner's Guide —
Association of Pedestrian and
Bicycle Professionals
Conference (2019)
Bikeway Planning Studio - USC,
Sol Price School of Public
Policy (2015)
Bikeway Planning and Design —
UCLA Department of Urban
Planning, Transportation
Planning Lecture Series (2010,
2012)
Bikeway Planning and Design —
Cal Poly Pomona, Department
of Landscape Architecture
Lecture Series (2010)
Matt Benjamin
Principal I Technical Support
About
Over the past 20+ years, Matt has approached transportation planning from a variety of perspectives, both as a user of all modes, and through his work in the public, non-profit, and private sectors. He has a long track record of leading complex multimodal transportation and safety projects that have been implemented throughout Southern California including complete streets projects, safety improvements, bike share systems, mobility hubs and next generation bus stops. Matt regularly coordinates teams of planners, data scientists, and engineers to develop appropriate complete streets and traffic safety countermeasures.

Relevant Project Experience
Rancho Cucamonga Active Transportation Plan (ATP) (Rancho Cucamonga, CA) Project Manager. Fehr & Peers is developing a school -focused ATP for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Building on the City's award -winning General Plan, also supported by Fehr & Peers, the new plan strengthens the City's layered mobility network with a comprehensive approach to safe, connected travel options. As part of this work, Fehr & Peers is developing design details for each project, identifying new improvements to complete the network, with a strong focus on school access.

The team provides regular updates to all local school districts and facilitates discussions with youth leaders through the City's Annual Teen Summit. The final plan delivers a detailed, implementable list of projects designed to improve mobility and safety for students and the broader community.

Citywide Pedestrian Safety Study (Moreno Valley, CA)
Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers partnered with the City of Moreno Valley to complete a citywide systemic pedestrian safety analysis focused on improving safety at uncontrolled crosswalks and enhancing access to bus stops. The team developed a prioritized list of safety projects to position the City for future grant funding and created an action plan with performance metrics, benchmarks, and implementation strategies. To capture near misses and unreported incidents, Fehr & Peers launched a bilingual webmap survey and convened a multidisciplinary stakeholder group, including senior advocates, multicultural organizations, and public health representatives —to guide plan development and ensure community perspectives were reflected throughout.

Santa Ana Safe Routes to School (Santa Ana, CA)
Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers was part of a team that developed Safe Routes to School plans for every school in the City of Santa Ana. Fehr & Peers staff led walk audits of elementary, middle and high schools in Santa Ana including collecting roll call surveys of student mode share from teachers, interviewing school principals and key staff familiar with pick-up and drop-off activities, and facilitating discussions with parents in English and Spanish. Fehr & Peers also prepared detailed school improvement maps for 29 schools that will be used for securing grant funding for implementation.

The Anaheim Resort Mobility Study (Anaheim, CA)
Project Manager. Matt managed the Anaheim Resort Area Mobility Plan which created a long-term vision for mobility in the Anaheim Resort Area which attracts 34 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr & Peers
millions of visitors annually from around the world. The study identifies transformative mobility and safety improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit users in and around the Anaheim Resort Area that will be carried forward in conjunction with other major real estate development and infrastructure projects in this dynamic regional activity center.

City of Westminster Safe Routes to School (Westminster, CA) Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers is partnered with Alta Planning and Design to develop Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plans for 21 schools in the City of Westminster, California. Fehr & Peers staff led the collection of existing conditions, including collision history, conformance with other plans, and school -area counts.

Fehr & Peers completed a detailed review of school -related collisions and prepared an analysis of gaps within a quarter mile walkshed of each school. Finally, Fehr and Peers will use knowledge of the local area and understanding of client's needs to provide a feasibility review of proposed projects.

City of Oxnard Safe Routes to School (SRTS), Phases I & II (Oxnard, CA) Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers is completing a multiyear SRTS program for the City of Oxnard, covering 52 schools across urban, suburban, and agricultural areas.

For each school, the team conducts walk audits and detailed collision analyses using state and local data. The findings identify infrastructure improvements that enhance safety and position the City for future grant funding opportunities. 2022 Vision Zero Safety Analysis (Los Angeles, CA)
Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers supported LADOT in updating its Vision Zero technical analysis, evaluating implemented countermeasures, refining the High - Injury Network, and prioritizing future safety investments. The effort incorporated systemic safety analysis, big data, and near -miss analytics to assess outcomes and focus strategies proven to improve roadway safety, helping Los Angeles track progress and advance its Vision Zero program.

LABOE Sidewalk & Transit Amenities Program (STAP) (Los Angeles, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Fehr & Peers is providing planning, engineering logistical support to StreetsLA for the implementation of the City's Sidewalk and Transit Amenities (STAP) program. We are working as part of a large multidisciplinary team as a subconsultant, and are responsible for the planning, design, manufacture, and installation of over 3,000 new bus shelters in advance of the 2028 Olympic Games.

Fehr & Peers is specifically supporting the development of data management protocols and a plan for strategically clustering and sequencing the installation of bus shelters to maximize public benefit and the sustainability of the program. Fehr & Peers is also assisting with desktop and field -based data collection, and the preparation of site plans and electrical plans.

Orange County Mobility Hub Strategy (Orange County, CA) Project Manager. Fehr & Peers led technical tasks for OCTA's regional mobility hub strategy, defining hub typologies to guide planning and developing a suitability web map based on five demand profiles representing commuters, students, tourists, and other users. The team also created and applied a methodology to estimate potential mode shift using regional travel demand model outputs and time and cost analysis, helping identify high -potential locations and inform implementation strategies across Orange County.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 35

Fehr&Peers
Education
Master of City and Regional
Planning, University of Texas at
Arlington, 1999
Bachelor of Arts, Political
Science, University of Texas at
Arlington, 1997
Years of Experience
Total: 26 years
With Fehr & Peers: 8 years
Registrations
AICP (26392)
Affiliations
Transportation Research Board
(TRB) Intermodal Freight
Committee (AT045)
American Planning Association
(APA)
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Women's Transportation
Seminar (WTS)
Jolene Hayes, AICP
Principal I Technical Support
About
Jolene, located in our Orange County office of Fehr & Peers, has 27 years of experience in local, regional and statewide transportation, land use and goods movement planning and research, environmental analysis, and implementation.

With a focus on collaboration and stakeholder input, Jolene focuses on the development of sustainable transportation solutions. Her work frequently requires a deep level of understanding community concerns, industry needs, and State economic and environmental sustainability goals to develop cross -cutting solutions that reduce greenhouse gases while fostering economic vitality. Throughout her career, Jolene has planned, prioritized and implemented a variety of transportation projects ranging from traffic calming and bikeway improvements to major freight infrastructure projects. She is well -versed in local, regional and national issues and understands the importance of balancing the movement of goods and people on railways, roadways and waterways from a local, port, regional, state and national perspective.

Relevant Project Experience
Town of Apple Valley Circulation Plan Update (Apple Valley, CA) Associate -in -Charge. Jolene led the Town's update of its circulation element. The update was prompted by the removal of the High Desert Corridor through the Town, and it also incorporated new policies to address state legislative requirements.

Beaumont Truck Routing Study (Beaumont, CA)
Project Manager. Jolene led a detailed analysis to assist the City with developing a truck route network to serve a major industrial warehousing hub that is quickly growing. The analysis consisted of a land use study of truck generating uses and sensitive receptors, existing truck volumes on local roadways, truck origins/destinations, existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and detailed AutoTurn analysis of the truck route network to identify potential improvements needed to accommodate trucks.

City of Hesperia General Plan Mobility Element Update (Hesperia, CA) Project Manager. Jolene led the update to the Circulation Element prompted by an update to the City's Housing Element. This update incorporates policies that conform with state legislation, such as complete streets and provisions for truck routes, and identifies future transportation system improvements, such as changes to roadway classifications and access to the future Brightline Station.

City of Ontario General Plan Update and Amendment (Ontario, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Jolene led the update of The Ontario Plan (the City's General Plan) Mobility Element, which revisited roadway classifications, truck routes, and bicycle facilities throughout the City. Following completion of this effort, the City received a Specific Plan proposal that requires changes to planned truck and bicycle routes. She is currently assisting the City with a General Plan Amendment to update the Land Use and Mobility Elements.
36 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr&Peers
City of Barstow General Plan Update (Barstow, CA)
Associate -in -Charge. Jolene led the update of the City's Mobility Element, which is now in the public review and comment period. The update was prompted by the incorporation of additional land to support the expansion of the BNSF Railway's Barstow rail yard known as the Barstow International Gateway (BIG). This effort required revisiting the City's bikeway network and designated truck routes to minimize conflicts.

SBCTA & WRCOG Assembly BiII 98 (AB 98) Guidance (San Bernardino & Riverside Counties, CA)
Principal -in -Charge. Following the passage of AB 98 on September 30, 2024, Jolene led a regional effort for SBCTA and WRCOG member agencies to assist them with implementation. AB 98 requires jurisdictions to adopt truck routes consistent with the legislation, such as using roadways that avoid sensitive receptors. For this effort, her team mapped all existing truck routes and developed guidance on updating development standards and codes to comply.

City of Jurupa Valley Freight Study (Jurupa Valley, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Jolene is currently leading the City's AB 98 compliance and Mobility Element Update with a special focus on improving safety by reducing truck -involved collisions and conflicts. This effort consists of a robust public outreach process to identify areas of concern, such as bike/ped concerns, a deep analysis of truck movements throughout the City, and a full update to the City's Mobility Element.

City of Colton AB 98/SB 415 Implementation (Colton, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Jolene is leading the implementation of Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), which superseded AB 98 on October 3, 2025, for the City of Colton. This effort included a robust public outreach and interjurisdictional coordination effort combined with data analysis to identify preferred truck routes throughout the community. Pursuant to the legislation, Colton was required to incorporate truck routes into its General Plan by January 1, 2026. Doing so also required an addendum to the General Plan EIR and tribal consultation. Currently, Jolene is ensuring the code amendments comply with the law's zoning and building standards.

City of Industry On -Call Transportation Planning Services (City of Industry, CA) Project Manager. Jolene is leading this on -call transportation support services contract with the City, which began in 2021. The majority of the support has been peer review of transportation impact studies, and preparation of VMT analyses for City -led projects.

City of Coachella RAISE (BUILD) 2025 Grant (Coachella, CA) Project Manager. Jolene managed the USDOT grant application for a new interchange at SR 86 at Avenue 50. The effort consisted of data collection for updating the BCA, preparing all required grant sections, and preparing graphics that demonstrate the Project's importance.

San Gabriel Valley COG VMT Tool Update
Project Manager. Jolene assisted 27 SGVCOG member cities comply with the initial SB 743 requirements. This effort began in 2019, and most recently, she worked with the participating cities to update their thresholds, transportation study guidelines, and the online VMT Assessment Tool to reflect the SCAG 2024 RTP/SCS.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 37

Fehr & Peers
Education
Master of Urban and Regional
Planning, University of
California, Irvine, 2018
Bachelor of Science in
Kinesiology, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, 2015
Registrations
League of American Bicyclists —
League Certified Instructor
(LCI)
Federal Aviation Administration
Part 107 Commercial Drone
Pilot
Years of Experience
Total: 10 years
With Fehr & Peers: 2 years
Expertise
Active Transportation Planning
(ATP)
Data Ontology and Strategy
Complete Streets
Implementation
Systemic Safety Analysis
Multimodal Corridor Planning
Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Safe Routes for Seniors (SRFS)
General Plans
Grant Writing / Funding
E -Mobility Planning
Traffic Analysis
Transportation Demand
Modeling
Trevor Lien
Senior Engineer / Planner I Planning Lead
About
Trevor Lien is a Senior Engineer I Planner with ten years of experience delivering data -driven transportation planning and implementation projects across Orange, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and Riverside counties. He brings end -to -end project expertise spanning traffic analysis, multimodal complete streets, environmental/ CEQA, data ontology, systemic safety, active transportation, e -mobility, freight and goods movement, first/last-mile connectivity, grant/implementation planning, and Safe Routes to School and for Seniors. The ethos Trevor embodies is: 1) attention to detail with a clear vision, 2) efficiency in everything, and 3) balanced insight driven by data.

Relevant Project Experience
SBCTA Active Transportation Plan Update & Data Management Plan (San Bernardino County, CA)
Project Manager. Trevor updated the countywide Active Transportation Plan (ATP), refreshing multimodal data sources and creating a prioritization methodology for hundreds of bicycle, pedestrian, SRTS, and points -of -interest projects in preparation for SBCTA's funding call. This effort resulted in a robust ATP and Data Management Plan for seamless integration and use in funding and implementation phasing by the SBCTA.

OCTA Active Transportation On -Call Services (Orange County, CA)* Project Manager. Trevor led a multidisciplinary team in providing active transportation support services for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The contract involved ATP and grant -writing technical assistance meetings, as well as guiding the county's SRTS stakeholder committee to develop a vision for SRTS planning. This three-year program advanced OCTA's strategic objectives to address countywide mobility needs.

Los Angeles County Bicycle Master Plan (Los Angeles, CA)* Planning Lead. Trevor guided feasibility analysis, design guidelines, recommendations, and conceptual plan development. The feasibility analysis identified quick -build, implementable segments through a customized GIS tool, while the design guidelines refreshed a decades -old document with cutting -edge research. Trevor's recommendations planned for thousands of miles of bike infrastructure, using feasibility, LTS, safety, and equity metrics as core indicators.

Trevor maintained regular check -ins throughout the project with strategic advisors to ensure the project met its goals and delivered successful outcomes.

OCTA Mobility Hubs Study (Orange County, CA)
Project Manager. Trevor led the development of a comprehensive mobility hub assessment evaluating ten locations across Orange County. He directed the creation of a multi -phase site prioritization scheme designed to translate theoretical hub locations into sites with high operational potential. The methodology incorporated dozens of criteria including political will, demand, and administrative / implementation complexity. Trevor worked directly with OCTA staff 38 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr & Peers
to ensure the scoring schema aligned with the agency's vision, goals, and objectives.

Irvine Boulevard Class IV Pilot Report (Irvine, CA)*
Project Manager. Trevor led a multidisciplinary team of engineers and planners in evaluating six separated bike lane options along Irvine Boulevard, a pioneering case study for the City of Irvine. Key deliverables included graphical cross sections, an implementation strategy map for Class IV facilities, and engineering conceptual plans for four intersection types —freeway, large, regular, and T -intersection. Trevor oversaw the development of detailed per -mile cost estimates and presented the Pilot Report to the Transportation Commission.

OCTA E -Bike Safety Plan (Orange County, CA)*
Planning Lead. Trevor oversaw task delivery for this initiative. Key outcomes included an assessment of existing data, non -infrastructure resources, and strategies for e -bike safety, resulting in targeted action items for countywide improvements. The project also incorporated educational e -bike rodeos, virtual workshops, and stakeholder engagement efforts to connect with communities across the county.
"HB In Motion" — Multimodal Implementation Plan (Huntington Beach, CA)* Project Manager. Trevor directed a team of planners and engineers to deliver the plan successfully. Primary outcomes featured phased pedestrian and bicycle networks, along with strategies for integrating e -bike mobility in the city. He facilitated stakeholder and public workshops, collaborated with city officials, and ensured the plan reflected community needs.

San Diego Bicycle Master Plan (San Diego, CA)
Project Planner. Trevor supported the initial phases of the master plan update, conducting a best practices review of local and national bicycle planning efforts and analyzing the state of San Diego's existing network. His work established a data -driven foundation by layering multiple datasets to identify gaps and opportunities across the city. This groundwork informed the development of an implementation -focused bicycle network designed for integration into San Diego's existing funding and delivery processes.

SBCTA Comprehensive Project Hub (San Bernardino County, CA) Project Data and Systems Lead. Trevor led the development and visioning of SBCTA's Comprehensive Project Hub, a centralized, GIS-enabled platform designed to track project lifecycles, funding, status, and performance across SBCTA programs and member agencies. He supported the development of the Proof of Concept and Version 1.0 Roadmap by helping define the guiding vision, phased implementation strategy, and standardized data ontology, including project metadata schema, unique project identifiers, and cross -departmental data integration processes. Trevor's work strengthened SBCTA's ability to manage, visualize, and report on projects.
*Work performed before joining Fehr & Peers
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 39

Fehr& Peers
Education
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Northeastern
University, 2011
Registrations
Civil Engineer:

California (PE 86774)
Arizona (PE 68882)
Hawaii (PE 17856)
Utah (PE 13889397-2202)
Road Safety Professional 1
(TPCB)
Years of Experience
Total: 16 years
With Fehr & Peers: 9 years
Affiliations
National Committee on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices
(NCUTCD), Technical Member
ITE Pedestrian & Bicycle
Standing Committee Executive
Committee Member
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Member
Certifications
Roadway and Interchange
Lighting Design Training —MD
State Highway (2014)
Sustainable Transportation
Professional (STP) Certification
— Greenroads Foundation
(2013)
Signing & Pavement Marking
Design Training — MD State
Highway (2013)
Claude Strayer, PE, RSP,
Principal I Engineering Lead
About
Claude is a principal transportation engineer with over 16 years of experience.

Specializing in design, his experience includes managing projects focused on signing and striping, design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, traffic signal upgrades, wayfinding, temporary traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and lighting enhancements. He is well -versed in numerous industry standard references including the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, is a certified road safety professional (Level 1) and serves on the Executive Committee of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Standing Committee of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).

He has served as Engineer of Record and led teams of designers on a variety of other transportation engineering projects such as temporary traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and lighting. He also has experience performing traffic analysis as well as studies with respect to parking and traffic circulation.

Relevant Project Experience
SDSU Mission Valley Campus Engineering (San Diego, CA)
Project Manager. Fehr & Peers handled the transportation planning analysis and design services for the planned SDSU Mission Valley campus at the SDCCU (formerly Qualcomm) Stadium site. This included assisting with the site planning and development of the overall mobility network, which involved multimodal facilities and design of two multilane roundabouts. This included the preparation of the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the environmental document that included the traffic operations analysis (i.e., level of service at intersections, on roadways, and on freeway facilities). We are currently working at the final design level of the design including roadway signing and striping and traffic signals PS&E for both on and off -site improvements.

SANDAG North Park Mid -City PS&E (San Diego, CA)
Fehr & Peers completed the planning, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for 11 traffic signal modifications along the Meade, Georgia, and Landis bikeways in the North Park -Mid City area of San Diego, as well as the wayfinding design for the Meade and Landis bikeways. The signal modifications included the preparation of 100% plans that addressed the planned removal of separate left -turn lanes at numerous intersections, the installation of curb extensions/bend outs, and modifications to signal phasing. The wayfinding plans included PS&E for confirmation and destination signage based on guidelines previously prepared for SANDAG by Fehr & Peers.

City of Beverly Hills On -Call Traffic Engineering Services (Beverly Hills, CA) Lead Engineer. Fehr & Peers serves the City of Beverly Hills with an on -call contract for traffic engineering services. We have assisted the City in a wide range of tasks, including an in-depth assessment of safety and operations at a complex intersection, which included presentations to the City Council and Traffic and Parking Commission; development of a Transportation Division Procedures Manual for internal use; review of site plans for the new bikeshare stations; assessment and implementation of a pilot project to convert traditional school crosswalks to 40 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr&Peers
continental; evaluation of existing and proposed crosswalks to identify appropriate treatments/enhancements; and traffic -related concerns submitted by residents and business owners. We have also prepared plan check comments for temporary traffic control plans associated with minor encroachment permit work and very complex utility work associated with the Metro Westside Subway Project. We have commenced work on a signal modification and corridor synchronized timing plan update along Olympic Boulevard. In addition, we have served as the on -site Traffic Engineer for the City with the recent retirement of City staff.

LABOE Complete Streets Project (Los Angeles, CA)
Engineering QC. Fehr & Peers served as a subconsultant to develop complete streets project recommendations for three corridors (Culver Boulevard, Highland Avenue, and La Brea Avenue) on the City of Los Angeles High Injury Network (HIN). Fehr & Peers led a Roadway Safety Assessment and ADA assessment of each corridor which included a multidisciplinary team of both local and outside agency experts from around the country. The safety and ADA assessment along with a review of existing traffic patterns and future plans for each corridor informed the development of detailed concept plans for each corridor. Fehr & Peers prepared the detailed concept plans for complete streets elements including new and modified traffic signals, crosswalks, and intersection signing and striping. Fehr & Peers also assisted with cost estimation and the preparation of the final Project Development Reports for each corridor that will be used to inform the development of PS&E.

Honolulu Complete Streets Planning & Design (Honolulu, HI) Engineer of Record. Fehr & Peers conducted multimodal transportation analysis, complete streets planning, and design plan development for 15.6 miles of bikeway facilities throughout Honolulu's Primary Urban Center (PUC). This project was envisioned as a critical first phase of the expansion of a low traffic stress bicycle and pedestrian network, and a trophy project for Honolulu's leadership in innovative bikeway planning and design. A key component of our work focused on the design, which Mr. Strayer contributed to, of Complete Streets that provide improved and balanced bike, pedestrian, transit, and vehicular mobility and access while supporting the civic life of streets and an economically and environmentally sustainable context. Mr. Strayer was the project manager of the design phase which included final (PS&E) design of signing and striping, bicycle facilities, and traffic signal modifications, specifically for Pensacola Street between Wilder Avenue and Waimanu Street.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 41

Fehr & Peers
Years of Experience
Total: 10
With Fehr & Peers: 1
Education
Master of Urban Placemaking
and Management,
Pratt Institute, 2019
Bachelor of Arts,
Communication,
University of California, Santa
Barbara, 2008
Affiliations
WTS-Los Angeles
Mentorship Program
Participant, 2024
Coro New York Leadership
Center
Neighborhood Leadership
Program Participant, 2020
Presentations
Sam Schwartz (now TYLin)
Open Streets Webinar,
Panelist 2022
Urban Design Forum
Good Form Series,
Presenter 2022
Kristin Brown
Senior Engineer/Planner I Outreach Lead
About
Kristin is a placemaking and planning professional that first connected with community engagement by volunteering with her local neighborhood association.

Throughout her career, Kristin has been deeply involved in diverse community engagement efforts that support public space management and operations, community programming, and advocacy. Her work helps transform neighborhoods by creating and maintaining healthy, vibrant, and sustainable communities.

Select Project Experience
LADOT Olympics Active Transportation Corridors (Los Angeles, CA) Engagement and Grant Support. Fehr & Peers is supporting the City of LA in delivering 40 miles of complete street projects ahead of the 2028 Olympic & Paralympic Games. In addition to extensive technical analysis, Fehr & Peers is leading large-scale community engagement efforts along each corridor. Our strategy involves a carefully designed survey to help gather feedback, supported by a series of pop-up events to connect with community members in spaces they already frequent. Kristin is currently coordinating all graphics for the project's upcoming grant application.

Oxnard Safe Routes to School (Oxnard, CA)
Engagement Analyst. As part of a multiyear effort developing Safe Routes to School plans for the City of Oxnard, Fehr & Peers led multiple phases of engagement, gathering data both pre- and post -project. Kristin led the analysis of this data, studying the effect of the project on how Oxnard students travel to school.

Columbus Avenue Business Improvement District (BID) Open Streets Program* (New York, NY)
Project Manager. Kristin led all planning, engagement, communications, resourcing, staffing, programming, and analytical components of creating a nine -block Open Streets program for the Columbus Avenue BID. She engaged with residents, business owners, city agencies, and elected officials to garner support and address concerns, all while opening the program within an ambitious two -month time frame. The first season saw a 45% increase in pedestrian traffic with over 30k visitors to the program, garnering a 98% approval rating from business owners and residents.

Brooklyn Bridge Park Community Engagement Workshop and Vision Plan, Emily Warren Roebling Plaza* (Brooklyn, NY)
Project Manager. Kristin worked closely with the Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation and the Brooklyn Bridge Park Community Advisory Council to develop and lead a community workshop that would determine the direction of the last plaza to be built in Brooklyn Bridge Park. She helped coordinate interviews with over 30 individual stakeholders, and led breakout sessions at an engagement workshop with over 80 attendees. She analyzed both quantitative and qualitative data from the feedback gathered, and used the findings to help develop a vision plan for the park, making recommendations for design, programming, and governance. *Work performed before joining Fehr & Peers
42 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Sample Project Sheets
Appendix
We bring the ability to develop tailored project sheets that clearly present relevant experience, using multi -page formats where appropriate to align with Beaumont's priorities and decision - making needs.

Representative examples are provided on the
following pages to illustrate this approach.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 43

CONNECT RC SAMPLE PROJECT SHEETS
PROJECT IDEA 07
Cucamonga Creek Trail
Resurfacing & Crossing
Enhancements
Base Line Road C > Demens Creek Trail

CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
Distance 06 Miles
Existing Bike Facility Class I Off -Street Bikeway
PlanRC Bike/Pad Priority Yes
Schools Valle Vista Elementary
Population Within
Quarter Mile

3.700

PROJECT BENEFITS
Recommendations
O Class I Bikeway enhancements
along Cucamonga Creek Trail
including trail resurfacing,
wayfinding improvements, and
at -grade crossing improvements,
including a high -visibility
crosswalk that ties in with
existing signal at the following:
▪ Carnelian Street end wed Hill
Country Club Drive
(0 Access to Schools) (O Access to Jobs/Retail I o Access to Parks & Re

PROJECT AREA FEATURES
3rd
tie Creek hall resurfacing end ace cements would
greatly Improve ® the biking experience on the trail.

Preliminary Cost $497,000
Estimate:
4V4P.

F-
Ongoing Planning Effort
The 2023 2024 Capital
Improvements Program (CIPIlists
Cucamonga Creek Channel trail
between Foothill Boulevard and
Base Line Road for trail pavement
resurfacing. This will enhance
pedestrian and bicyclist safety
by restoring the existing trail to a
new condition and extending the
pavement life.

Existing Facility
- Class I Bike Path
- Class II Bike Lane
- Class 111 Bike Route
27 45
Proposed Facility

1.1 Traci Resurfacing
111 Hlgh-VIslbllcy Crosswalk
® We'd -Waling Improvements
AddRtonal stgnage can help direct
bicyclists onto the paved paths and
pedestrians 8 equestrian users onto
the PG paths.

Cucamonga — Red Hill

PROJECT IDEA II
Hermosa Avenue
Buffered Bike Lane and New Sidewalks

CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
Distance 1.0 Mlles
Typical Width 42'-60'
Number of Lanes 2-5
Posted Speed Llmh 45 MPH
AADT Estimate (2019) 10,911
Street Typology Bicycle Corridor
Existing Bike Facility
PleoRC Bike/Ped Priority Yes
Schools
Doha Merced Elementary
Rancho Cucamonga Middle
Transit
Trail Connection
Percent of Population
Recommendations
O Class II Buffered Bike Lane along Hermosa
Ave. from Baseline Rd. to Foothill Blvd.

O Enhance comfort through lane reduction
from Baseline Pd. to Foothill Blvd. from
4 -lanes to 2 -lanes,
OAdd Sidewalks along west side of Hermosa
Ave. at the following locations:
i Between approximately ti5 ft. south of Hemlock St. and 275 ft. north of Norwick St.
▪ About 300 ft. south of 8th Street foropproximotely250 ft
Typical Existing Cross -Section: Between Baseline
Road and Foothill Boulevard
Within Quarter Mile 5,040 Recommended Cross section 64' (Restripe to 2 travel lanes from Baseline Road to Foothill Boulevard(
mimmasci

14. Preliminary Cost
$322,000 I I I I I I I
Estimate:

PROJECT BENEFITS
(O Access to Schools) \(a Access to Parks & ec u
(0 Access to Jabs/Retail (0 Access to Transit)
(O Network Connectivity) (0 Collision Histor)
(0 Key Barrier/Gap Closure)
7 5' TT IS try k" 7

PROJECT AREA FEATURES
travel lap long
buf e traffic
fered and provide llowHermosa Ave. can ereer...°ass bicycle facilities improveBuffered bike lanes along Hermosa
Ave. can designate space
e. network
connectivity
44 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Bike Network Recommendations Capital Improvement Plan
/0001/G G IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
Capital Improvement Plan
This Plan Includes a wide range of projects
with varying degrees of cost. Project cost
estimates were developed to give a general
idea of the anticipated cost for the projects. Soft
costs, including permitting and environmental
support, design and preliminary engineering,
specifications and estimates, utility
coordination, drainage and Storm Water
Pollution Prevention (SWPP), construction
management and inspection, mobilization, traffic
control, and general contingencies, were considered.

Soft costs are typically calculated as a percent
of construction costs but can vary depending on
the type, size, and complexity of the project. The
table to the right shows the breakdown of soft
costs as a percentage of construction costs
applied to these planning -level cost estimates,
The costs in this Plan are for informational purposes
only. More detailed cost estimates should be
developed for each project In the design phase.

Typical Soft Cost Assumptions Applied
Construction Allowances
Mobilization
Traffic Control
10%
5°%
Stormwater Pollution 5°%
Prevention Plans
Utilities
Drainage
Contigency
15%
30%
25%
Program/Project Soft Costs
Preliminary Engineering 10%
Environmental Clearance
Final Design/ PUS
Construction Management
What is a Quick -Build vs. Permanent Build?
Quick -build is an approach to building
infrastructure using low-cost. shorter -term
materials to lessen construction impacts and
Implementation timelines. Bicycle facilities
and pedestrian crossing improvements can
be installed with quick -build materials to
provide near -term safety benefits while waiting
for funding for the permanent project.

Permanent -build projects typically include
modifications to the curb line, utility work,
and/or durable materials such as concrete.

Project elements could Include street trees,
stormwater retention features, lighting, and
sidewalk improvements. Bicycle facilities and
pedestrian crossing improvements are built
using more durable materials than quick -
build projects, such as concrete barriers.

Permanent Improvements can replace quick -
build elements over time as the project evolves
and based on public input, interest, and use.

COVINA ACTIVE STREETS & MOLTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY PLAN

COVINA ACTIVE STREETS

SAMPLE PROJECT SHEETS

PRIORITY PROJECT
Workman Street & Hollenbeck Avenue
Pedestrian and Streetscape Enhancements
Purpose
Provide a more comfortable route to school for
Workman Elementary School and Covina High School
students and faculty by increasing tree canopy and
green infrastructure, providing pedestrian -scale
lighting, and installing crosswalk enhancements.

Planning -level Coat Estimate
(Construction & Design)
Permanent Build
$4.75-7.5M
Benefits
• Investment in historically
marginalized community
• Improves safety and comfort
• Improves access to transit
on Rowland Avenue
• Provides increased
access to schools
• Builds climate resilience
through green infrastructure
and tree canopy
Design Treatments
1!n wgh-vm'knry imrmwater
rosewa plure
veaaing
a.atdan
.� Interval
ute 71.
vlon
r* Tranalt
� SM1elter
- Bike Facilities
- Street Trees,
Pedestrian -scale
wideed and
widened
Sidewalks
Corridor -wide
Treatments
= WartledIre
i: Bike Detection
IT;,I, concoct zone
Marking
tar ammo
Tightening
®t oavlighdng
Project Imelemenrrlon will require further engineering feasibility. design, and community engagement 29 PRIORITY PROJECT
4th Avenue
Bicycle Boulevard
Purpose
Provide a bicycle boulevard and improve pedestrian safety along 4th Avenue. Incorporate landscaping and green
infrastructure into curb extensions and traffic circles.

Planning -level Cost Estimate
(Construction & Design)
Permanent Build Quick Build
$1.5-2.5M $375-600K
Corridor -wide
Treatments
wayfinding
Bete Detection
Tightenn'gn
eoPeto
eria,atoda, a
'x41 00
Center St
DRY et st
Benefits
• Investment In historically
marginalized community
• improves safety and
comfort for all users
• Improves access to transit
on radius Street
• Provides increased access to Covina
Park, Emanate Health Inter -Community
Hospital, downtown Covina, and
Covina Valley USD District Field
• Can be Implemented through repaving
and other quick-bulld methods
Considerations
- Sharrows should be installed at least
very 250' and be spaced In the center
of the lane out of the door zone
• Traffic calming elements (traffic circle,
speed humps) should be spaced every
250'-400' to effectively manage speeds
Design Treatments
(/'�l speed Hump till erosswlakillry
f Tramicelrcle • curs Ezterelo
l l� Tremlc signal t cyclln
on g
Bike Facilities
Project Implementation Will require nevher engineering feaslblll sign, and community engagement
COVINAA JIVE SIREEi95.MIII.IIM00AL CONNECIIVII I FI.Ah DO Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 45

421 Chapter 5: Recommendations
Oxnard High School (9-12)
Oxnard High School sees a large amount of pedestrian activity and vehicle congestion during arrival and dismissal, partially due to the location on Gonzales Road and partially due to the size of the school. Recommendations focus on increasing comfort for pedestrians and cyclists and reducing traffic congestion. iig QUICK ACTION
• SCHOOL STAFF: Prepare a plan to enforce and monitor a reversible lane on Campus Road during arrival and dismissal.
• PARENTS/GUARDIANS/STUDENTS: Outside of arrival/dismissal, there is noparking permitted along Gonzales Road. rintrd
11131%10

LOCATION KEY FINDING
ACTION
LEAD
0 Many students were observed
using the sidewalk on the
southside of Gonzales Road.
, Widen the sidewalk and install sidewalk City of Oxnard lighting.
• Pede osing re
short forstriana 100crossing times were
short tot 0100, wide roadway.timeswe
Reevaluate signal timing for
pedestrians and potentially lengthen
during arrival & dismissal periods.

City of Oxnard
O Parents& guardians park in the
bike lane during dismissal period. -r —� Soria School (K-8) 431 Chapter 5: Recommendations
0 The curb radius on the
southwest and southeast corners
of the intersection are large,
leading to increased speeds for
turning vehicles.

During dismissal period, only
having one northbound lane leads
to traffic congestion.
c

OXNARD SAFE

ROUTE TO SCHOOLS

SAMPLE PROJECT
SHEETS
Soria's location diverts a lot of traffic during arrival and dismissal periods onto Dunkirk Drive, creating congested conditions for bicyclists and pedestrians trying to access the school from the neighborhood to the south.

El QUICK ACTION
• SCHOOL STAFF: Pilot closure of parking lot entrance onto Dunkirk Drive during dismissal to reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts.
• PARENTS/GUARDIANS/STUDENTS: Try parking a few blocks away in the neighborhood to the south of the school campus during arrival and dismissal and walking the remaining distance to meet your child. ! Indicates near -term project
ACTION
LEAD

LOCATION KEY FINDING
0 Collision analysis shows a history
of vehicles being struck by autos
along Dunkirk after drivers do not
yield to stop signs.
.� Stripe crosswalks on all south legs to
funnel kids to school. Add signage on
cross street to alert that traffic does not
stop.

City of Oxnard
0 Bike lanes along Patterson abruptly Install signage on the roundabout end at roundabout, forcing bikes to 1 approach instructing drivers and cyclists Cityof Oxnard r to share the road and stripe sharrows in
merge into traffic. the roundabout.

Gap in northbound bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.

Restripe right turn lane to provide a
Class II bike facility in the northbound
direction and pave concrete sidewalk
over dirt driveway.

City of Oxnard
or
Northbound slip lane for right
turning vehicles creates narrow
pedestrian island. Additionally,
there is no conflict striping in the
shared bike lanes and right turn
lanes.

Stripe a bike conflict zone on the west
and eastbound turn lanes where bicycles
share the lanes. Evaluate signal timing City of Oxnard
and traffic flow impacts of removing slip
lane.
46 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

ABOUT THE SUBAREA
Santa Ynez Valle ATP SAMPLE PROJECT SHEETS

EXISTING CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW
Unincorporated communities include Ballard Los Alamos Los Olives and Santa Ynez A Existing Bike Facilities

9.5 miles
a Transit
Santa Ynez Valley Transit
Express Routs (21trips/day)
serves 6 stops in Santa Cnx
Los Olivos Loop 18 trips/day)
serves 12 stops in Los Olloos and
Santa Ynez
Santa Marla Regional Transit O
Breeze 100(6 trips/day)
serves 1 stop in Loa Alamos
O Schools
10 O Ballard Elementary
0 Dunn School
O Los Olivos Elementary
O Midland School
O Olga L Reed Elementary
o Santa Ynez Elementary
O Santa Ynez High
O Santa Ynez Valley Charter
O Santa Ynez Valley Christian Academy
O Santa Vnez Valley Family School
* Destinations
0 Chumash Resort/Cultural Center
o Nojaqui Falls Park
Oostrichland USA
O Santa Ynez Park
0 Santa Ynez Valley Historical Museum
0 Wineries 8 ranches
M

CONTEXT MAP
Chapters Active Transportation Projects & Toolbox 125

SANTA YNEZ
VALLEY
Project Recommendations
Los Olivos Ped/Bike
Enhancements

LOS OLIVOS
Baseline Avenue Ped/
Bike Enhancements
Refugio Road Ped/
Bike Enhancements
SANTA ON E2

RESERVATION
I

SANTA YNEZ VALLEY
Los Olivos
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK >
b Past years of community feedback have remarked upon walkability in Los Olivos.

Some comments on State Route 154 request bike facilities there. a1 General feedback from the rest of Santa Ynez Valley emphasized safer access to schools.
e Observation
•
•
Alamo pintado Avenue is the only east -west
connection across the creek but it lacks width
for sidewalks or passing space for bicyclists.

Location -Specific
Feedback
A Constraint
State Route 154 is a Caltrans facility
and any changes would require
Implementation by Caltrans.
9 Opportunity
However, the abandoned railroad right-of-way parallels much of 52-154 through town, enabling the possibility of a dedicated Class I facility as approved in the Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan 120091. r Lack of sidewalks in the north
part of Los Olivos and ewalks are too narrow.
existing
xisting Bike La
'dating Bikeways
- Class II Bike Lanes
Pod/Bike Collision severity, aces -acts
•
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 47

SR-1.5.4/Foxen Canyon Rd is
a site of 2 KSI bike collisions.

Chapters ActiveTranseortation Projects Si Toolbox
SANTA YNEZ VALLEY PROJECT 4
Los Olivos Ped/Bike
Enhancements
Railway Avenue Path & Alamo Pintado Avenue
Recommendations
O Pedestrian Network Enhancements
Add mailced crosswalks as indicated along Alamo Pintado Avenue Add Inflll sidewalk, pedestrian paths, and ped. bridge across creek i n n-nnis at State Route154/Foxen Canyon Pd
Planning and implementation of projects on Caltrans facilities Is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans
0 Class I Multi -Use Path
er railroad right-of-way on south side of State Route 154 per Santa Vnez Valley Community Plan 12009)
annn .. Crossing
as Neale.
a vlerninlac/
ew
Proposed Corridor Facility
Multi -Use Path (Class. II
Sidewalk /Walking Path

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

PROJECT AREA FEATURES
w.W
Local businesses and tasting
rooms in Los Olivos are key
ped/bike activity generators.

M lag
Missing sidewalks on
Alamo Pintado Avenue.

Class II In Forme, oon Weal woy
per com Chun Icy elan Pne91
Manned cnnavdallc
utea
On Wart

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

ATP SAMPLE PROJECT SHEETS
48 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr & Peers
Cost Proposal for City
of Beaumont Bicycle &
Pedestrian Master Plan
Prepared for:

City of Beaumont
Submitted on:

March 23, 2026
Submitted by:

Fehr & Peers

Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont
Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan
Tasks
Task 1 - Project Management

1.1 Project Initiation

1.2 Project Schedule and Management

1.3 Meetings and Coordination

1.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

1.5 Documentation and Grant Compliance
Task 2 - Existing Conditions Analysis

2.1 Review of Existing Plans and Data

2.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory

2.3 Field Review and Reconnaissance

2.4 Safety and Traffic Context Review

2.5 Connectivity and Accessibility Analysis
Task 3 - Field Review and Constraints Analysis

3.1 Right -of -Way Review and Feasibility Analysis

3.2 Corridor and Intersection Assessment

3.3 Physical and Operational Constraints

3.4 Planning -Level ADA and Accessibility Considerations Task 4 - Policy, Plan, and Standards Review

4.1 Review of City Plans and Policies

4.2 Review of Regional and State Guidance

4.3 Review of Design Standards and Guidelines

4.4 Policy Consistency Assessment
Task 5 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Development

5.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Framework

5.2 Connectivity and Access

5.3 Safety -Driven Network Development

5.4 Corridor Prioritization and Phasing

5.5 Planning -Level Cost Considerations
Task 6 - Conceptual Design and Plan Development

6.1 Conceptual Design Development

6.2 Mapping and Exhibits
Task 7 - Community and Stakeholder Engagement

7.1 Community Engagement Strategy

7.2 Public Outreach Activities

7.3 Stakeholder Coordination

7.4 Documentation of Public Input
Task 8 - Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.1 Draft Bicycle Master Plan

8.2 Implementation Strategy

8.3 Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.4 City Council Presentation and Approval
Task 9 - Project Closeout and Grant Documentation

9.1 Final Review and Approvals

9.2 Grant Documentation Support

9.3 Project Closeout
Fully Loaded Rate
Fehr Et Peers (Prime)
Donna
Jason Pack
Lewandowski
Principal -in -
Project
Charge
Manaaer
$220.00 $385.00
Matt
Benjamin
Technical
Su000rt
$380.00
Jolene Hayes Trevor Lien Claude Strayer
Technical Planning Engineering
Support Lead Lead
$315.00 $220.00 $320.00
2 1
14 2
30 4
4 4 4
14 2
4 8
4 2
2 2
2 2
2 1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
4 2
6 4
4 8
4 2
2 8
2 2
2 4
2 4
2 2
2 2
2 8
2 2
2 2
2 8
2 2
2 4
8 4 4 4 60
8 2 4 2 16
4 2 4 2 20
4 2
4 4
4 1
4 1
4 4
4 4
4 4
12 20
4 Total Without Optional Tasks
175 51 34 18 116 60
Optional Tasks
Optional Task 1- Community Walk Audits (2)
Optional Task 2 - Common Crash Profiles (Bicycle and Pedestrian) Optional Task 3 - Detailed Concept Designs and Cost Estimates Optional Task 4 - Grant Support
Optional Task 5 - Addendum to the General Plan
10 8
8 4 6
8 2 2
12 8 4
4 20
8 4
12 4
Total With All Optional Tasks
FALSE 65 46 22 144 80
Notes:

Actual billing rate at the time of service may vary depending on the final staffing plan at the time the project starts; the overall fee will not be exceeded.

Mileage is billed at the IRS rate plus 10% handling fee.

All other direct and subconsultant expenses are billed with 10% handling fee.

Other direct costs such as computer, communications, and reproduction charges are billed as a percentage of labor.

Rates and staff are subject to change at any time, without notice, and within the total budget shown 2 Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan

Kristin Brown
Outreach
Lead
$200.00
Planner/
Engineer III
$190.00
Graphics/GIS
Project
Coordinator
$240.00 $165.00
Labor
Hours
Direct Labor
Costs
Direct
Costs
Total
16 30
120
40 24
4 4
12 8
8 4
2 2
4 12
12 4
2 2
2 8
16 4
1 6 $1,430 $70 $1,500
2 18 $4,180 $210 $4,390
7 65 $14,255 $710 $14,965
2 14 $4,650 $230 $4,880
2 16 $3,410 $170 $3,580
1 9 $2,135 $110 $2,245
1 9 $1,805 $90 $1,895
3 23 $4,535 $230 $4,765
3 27 $5,775 $290 $6,065
3 29 $6,615 $330 $6,945
12 $3,230 $160 $3,390
10 $2,750 $140 $2,890
9 $2,365 $120 $2,485
9 $2,365 $120 $2,485
9 $1,970 $100 $2,070
7 $1,590 $80 $1,670
11 $2,870 $140 $3,010
12 $2,630 $130 $2,760
1 11 $3,205 $160 $3,365
1 11 $2,525 $130 $2,655
3 27 $6,415 $320 $6,735
2 16 $4,330 $220 $4,550
2 20 $5,810 $290 $6,100
16 7 65
12 22
$17,565 $880 $18,445
6 52 $12,240 $610 $12,850
4 36 $7,100 $360 $7,460
15 137 $26,915 $3,100 $30,015
7 59 $12,455 $620 $13,075
4 32 $6,670 $330 $7,000
20 13 113 $26,225 $1,310 $27,535
16 6 54 $12,230 $610 $12,840
8 5 45 $10,945 $550 $11,495
16 3 25 $5,985 $300 $6,285
9 $2,585
6 $1,430
6 $1,430
$130
$70
$70
$2,715
$1,500
$1,500
230 92 128 115
1,019
$234,620
$13,490
$248,110
20 20
12 12
12 6 56
4 36
5 47
6 54
4 32
$11,390
$8,340
$13,125
$12,240
$9,160
$570
$420
$660
$610
$460
$11,960
$8,760
$13,785
$12,850
$9,620
230 132 164 140
1,023
$288,875
$16,210
$305,085
Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 3

C26-41

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ("Agreement") is made and effective on this day of , by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT, a California municipal corporation ("City") whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223, and FEHR & PEERS, an S corporation whose address is 3880 Lemon Street Suite 420 Riverside, California 92501 ("Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "parties."

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understanding, and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. City desires to engage Contractor to provide the following services: Engineering Design Services for Capital Improvement Project R26-13: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update; and,
B. Contractor has made a proposal ("Proposal") to the City to provide such professional services, which Proposal Scope of Services is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and,
C. Contractor agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to City that Contractor possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel, and equipment to provide such services.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows:

1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall automatically terminate on May 31, 2028, unless extended by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the City.

C26-41

2. Services to be Performed. Contractor agrees to provide the services ("Services") as follows: Professional Services for Capital Improvement Project R26-13: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update in accordance with Exhibit "A". This contract includes the following optional services: Optional Task 2: Common Crash Profiles (Bicycles and Pedestrian), Task 3: Detailed Conceptual Designs, and Task 4: Grant support. All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. Contractor designates Sarah Brandenberg, as Contractor's Representative responsible for overseeing the Services provided by Contractor ("Contractor's Representative"). City designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as the Project Manager ("Project Manager") in connection with the delivery of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall supply, at its sole expense, all equipment, tools, materials, and supplies necessary to perform Services. In the event that the Proposal contains terms that are in addition to or in conflict with this Agreement, other than the price for Services, such terms shall not be valid and shall be of no force or effect.

3. Associates and Subcontractors. Contractor may, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors, and consultants as Contractor deems necessary to perform the Services; provided, however, that Contractor shall not subcontract any of the Services without the prior written consent of City.

4. Compensation.

4.01 Contractor shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Proposal and shall not increase any rate without the prior written consent of the City. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, total fees and charges paid by City to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of Two Hundred Eighty -Three Thousand Five Hundred Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($283,505.00).

4.02 Contractor shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the City, in writing.

4.03 Contractor shall submit to City, on or before the fifteenth (15th) of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The City shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. City shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to Contractor. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to City's:
a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;

C26-41
b. Verification that the hours billed, when multiplied by the approved hourly rates, result in the correct total;
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If City determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, City shall either return the bill to Contractor with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly and give notice to Contractor of the adjustment.

4.04 If the work is satisfactorily completed, City shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Should City dispute any portion of any invoice, City shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advise Contractor in writing of the disputed portion.

5. Obligations of Contractor.

5.01 Contractor agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proposal. In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement or contain additional terms that purport to bind the City other than the Services to be rendered and the hourly rate for the Services, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.

5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, Contractor will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. Contractor shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers. Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.

5.03 Contractor shall keep City informed as to the progress of the Services by means of regular and frequent consultations. Additionally, when requested by City, Contractor shall prepare written status reports.

5.04 Contractor is responsible for paying, when due, all income and other taxes, fees, and withholding, including withholding state and federal taxes, social security, unemployment and worker's compensation, incurred as a result of the compensation paid under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by City resulting from Contractor's failure to comply with this provision.

C26-41

5.05 In the event Contractor is required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications and/or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

5.06 Contractor represents that it possesses all required licenses necessary or applicable to the performance of Services under this Agreement and the Proposal and shall obtain and keep in full force and effect all permits and approvals required to perform the Services herein.

In the event City is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, Contractor shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.

5.07 Contractor shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment Eligibility Verification information from Contractor's employees, in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and shall ensure that Contractor's employees are eligible to work in the United States.

5.08 In the event that Contractor employs, contracts with, or otherwise utilizes any Ca1PERS retirees in completing any of the Services performed hereunder, such instances shall be disclosed in advance to the City and shall be subject to the City's advance written approval.

5.09 Drug -free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Contractor hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug -free workplace.

5.10 Contractor shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder including, but not limited to California Department of Industrial Relations (Cal/OSHA) regulations; and the U.S. Department of Transportation Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act, related to their scope of work and operations. In case of conflict, the most stringent shall apply.

5.11 Contractor shall keep itself informed concerning and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any federal, state or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.

5.12 By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that Contractor (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the conditions, circumstances, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this

C26-41
Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Contractor warrants that Contractor has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should the Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Contractor shall immediately inform the City of such facts and shall not proceed except at Contractor's sole risk until written instructions are received from the Project Manager.

Contractor warrants all Services under the Agreement to be of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material and workmanship. Contractor agrees that for a period of one year (or the period of time specified elsewhere in the Agreement or in any guarantee or warranty provided by any manufacturer or supplier of equipment or materials incorporated into the Services, whichever is later) after the date of final acceptance, Contractor shall within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the City of any defect in the Services or non-conformance of the Services to the Agreement, commence and prosecute with due diligence all Services necessary to fulfill the terms of the warranty at Contractor's sole cost and expense. Contractor shall act sooner as requested by the City in response to an emergency. In addition, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair and replace any portions of the Services (or work of other contractors) damaged by Contractor's defective Services or which becomes damaged in the course of repairing or replacing defective Services. For any Services so corrected, Contractor's obligation hereunder to correct defective Services shall be reinstated for an additional one-year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected Services. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor.

In the event that Contractor fails to fulfil its obligations under this Section, or under any other warranty or guaranty under this Agreement, to the satisfaction of the City, the City shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non -conforming Services and any work damaged by such services or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor's sole expense. Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the City for any expenses incurred hereunder upon demand.

Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.

5.13 Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

6. Insurance. Contractor hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal -OSHA.

Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Attached hereto as

C26-41
Exhibit "B" are copies of Certificates of Insurance and endorsements as required by Section 7.02.

If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Contractor shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:

6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 in the aggregate; Contractor agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured's City, its officials, employees and agents. Contractor also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.

6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident.

If Contractor or Contractor's employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, Contractor shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

6.03 Workers' Compensation insurance for any of Contractor's employees that will be providing any Services hereunder. Contractor will have a state -approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by California law. The provisions of any Workers' Compensation insurance will not limit the obligations of Contractor under this Agreement.

Contractor expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents. Sole proprietors with no employees, LLCs, or partnerships using the services of members or partners who do not carry Workers' Compensation insurance acknowledge that they are not subject to the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of California and agree to complete a signed workers' compensation exemption form.

6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required _ /Not Required (X); Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by Contractor, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for City.

6.05 Cyber Liability Insurance REQUIRED IF CHECKED HERE ONLY [ (Technology Professional Liability — Errors and Omissions), with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate or the full per occurrence limits of the policies available, whichever is greater. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Contractor in this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach

C26-41
response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations. Contractor will file with City, before beginning professional services, certificates of insurance (Acord Form 25 or equivalent) satisfactory to City evidencing.

6.06 If Claims Made Policies (applies only to professional liability and cyber liability policies):
i. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
ii. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the contract work.

7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage.

7.01 No liability insurance coverage provided shall prohibit Contractor from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contractor waives all rights of subrogation against City regardless of the applicability of insurance proceeds and shall require all contractors and subcontractors to do the same.

7.02 Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish City with certificates of insurance, endorsements, and upon request, complete copies of all policies, including complete copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf.

7.03 All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a minimum A.M. Best rating of "A:VII". The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business in California. The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.

7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.

Contractor acknowledges and agrees that that all insurance coverage required to be provided by

C26-41
Contractor or any subcontractor, shall apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance, indemnity or self-insurance available to City.

7.05 All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by City, as the need arises. Contractor shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent.

7.06 Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contractor or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

7.07 The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers. If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

8. Indemnification.

8.01 Contractor and City agree that City, its employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys' fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way related to the performance of this Agreement by Contractor or any subcontractor or agent of either as set forth herein. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to City. Contractor acknowledges that City would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of Contractor to defend, indemnify, and protect City as set forth herein.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its employees, agents and officials, from and against any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, injuries, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys' fees incurred by City, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of, or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement.

C26-41
Contractor's obligation to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits, and proceedings in which Contractor (and/or Contractor's agents and/or employees) is alleged to be an employee of City. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by Contractor as they are incurred by City.
b. Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement or this Section, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of City, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8A Indemnification Design Professionals. In the event that Contractor is a design professional under California Civil Code Section 2782.8 this Section 8A shall apply instead of Section 8. To the fullest extent permitted by California law and in accordance with California Civil Code section 2782.8, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, trustees and members ("Indemnified Parties") from any and all actions, assessments, counts, citations, claims, costs, damages, demands, judgments, liabilities (legal, administrative or otherwise), losses, notices, expenses, fines, penalties, proceedings, responsibilities, violations, attorney's and consultants' fees and causes of action including, but not limited to those for, injury to property or persons, including personal injury and/or death ("Claim(s)"), to the extent that the Claim(s) arises out of, pertains to, or relates to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its directors, officials, officers, employees and consultants arising out of, connected with, or resulting from the performance of the Services, the Project, or this Agreement. This indemnity excludes liability caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnified Parties. The cost to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend charged to Contractor shall not exceed Contractor's proportionate percentage of fault.

9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.

9.01. In the event Contractor performs additional or different services than those described herein without the prior written approval of the City Manager and/or City Council of City, Contractor shall not be compensated for such services. Contractor expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the City in writing.

9.02 Contractor shall promptly advise the City Manager and Finance Director of City as soon as reasonably practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events which may affect the scope and/or cost of Services. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and/or requests for additional services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the City and/or City Council.

C26-41

10. Termination of Agreement.

10.01. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, or for no cause, at any time by giving twenty (20) days' written notice to Contractor.

10.02 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due Contractor for undisputed Services performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within thirty (30) business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement. Immediately upon termination, Contractor agrees to promptly provide and deliver to City all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of Contractor and pertain to City.

11. Status of Contractor.

11.01 Contractor shall perform the Services in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling, and not as an employee of City. However, Contractor shall regularly confer with City's City Manager or Project Manager as provided for in this Agreement.

11.02 Contractor agrees that it is not entitled to the rights and benefits afforded to City's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, Workers' Compensation, retirement, Ca1PERS, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Contractor is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, Workers' Compensation and other insurance, training, permits, and licenses for itself and its employees and subcontractors.

11.03 Contractor hereby specifically represents and warrants to City that it possesses the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of City and that the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services in the same geographic area where the City is located. Further, Contractor represents and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor has the full authority to bind Contractor to this Agreement.

12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.

12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties, and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed, or obtained by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services

C26-41
performed for the City shall become the sole property of City, and Contractor shall promptly deliver all such materials to City upon request. At the City's sole discretion, Contractor may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to City upon request, at no cost to City.

12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, City shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement.

Contractor shall not use such data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall Contractor release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of City.

12.03 Contractor shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all-time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as City may deem necessary, Contractor shall make available to City's agents for examination all of such records and shall peiiiiit City's agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.

13. Miscellaneous Provisions.

13.01 This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of Services by Contractor for City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such Services in any manner whatsoever. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties.

13.02 Contractor shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of City. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

13.03 Contractor shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with City if required by California law and/or the City's conflict of interest policy.

13.04 If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

C26-41

13.05 This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California. The parties agree that venue in any litigation between them shall be in Riverside County, California.

13.06 Contractor covenants that neither it nor any officer or principal of its firm has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, either directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their Services hereunder. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.

13.07 Contractor has read and is aware of the provisions of Section 1090 et seq. and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code relating to conflicts of interest of public officers and employees. Contractor agrees that they are unaware of any financial or economic interest of any public officer or employee of the City relating to this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that if such a financial interest does exist at the inception of this Agreement, the City may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving notice thereof. Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.

13.08 Improper Consideration. Contractor shall not offer (either directly or through an intermediary) any improper consideration such as, but not limited to, cash, discounts, services, the provision of travel or entertainment, or any items of value to any officer, employee or agent of the City in an attempt to secure favorable treatment regarding this Agreement or any contract awarded by City. The City, by notice, may immediately terminate this Agreement if it determines that any improper consideration as described in the preceding sentence was offered to any officer, employee or agent of the City with respect to the proposal and award process of this Agreement or any City contract. This prohibition shall apply to any amendment, extension or evaluation process once this Agreement or any City contract has been awarded. Contractor shall immediately report any attempt by any City officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from Contractor.

13.09 Severability. If any portion, section, sentence, provision or paragraph of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.

13.10 Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall be responsible to comply with applicable prevailing wages laws. As a condition of payment, if applicable Contractor shall show proof of payment of wages under applicable state and federal laws and regulations relating to

C26-41
prevailing wages in accordance with the "General Wage Determination Made By the Director of Industrial Relations Pursuant To California Labor Code, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, Sections 1770, 1773 and 1773.1", for Riverside County and/or 40 U.S.C. Section 276a, et. seq. Such wage rates shall conform with those posted at City offices and the project site. In the event that the Contractor fails to pay the prevailing wages, the Contractor shall be solely liable for penalties and for the shortfall in wages and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City under Section 8.01 against any of the same. The following Labor Code sections are hereby referenced and made a part of this Agreement:

1. Section 1775 - Penalty for Failure to Comply with Prevailing Wage Rates.

2. Section 1777.4 - Apprenticeship Requirements.

3. Section 1777.5 - Apprenticeship Requirements.

4. Section 1813 - Penalty for Failure to Pay Overtime.

5. Sections 1810 and 1811 - Working Hour Restrictions.

6. Section 1776 - Payroll Records.

7. Section 1773.8 - Travel and Subsistence Pay.

13.11 Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry.

13.12 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.

Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or Services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non -defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

13.13 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

C26-41

13.14 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement.

13.15 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

13.16 Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

13.17 The recitals set forth in the preamble of this Agreement are hereby incorporated into and made a substantive part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.

13.18 Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party ("electronic signature"). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

C26-41
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above written.

CITY: CONTRACTOR:

CITY OF BEAUMONT FEHR & PEERS
By: By:

Print
Name:

Date:

ATTEST:

By:

Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

John O. Pinkney, City Attorney
Date:

Print
Name:

Date:

Page of 1910

C26-41
EXHIBIT "A"

PROPOSAL -SCOPE OF SERVICES

Fehr & Peers
Cost Proposal for City
of Beaumont Bicycle &
Pedestrian Master Plan
Prepared for:

City of Beaumont
Submitted on:

March 23, 2026
Submitted by:

Fehr & Peers

Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont
Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan
Tasks
Task 1 - Project Management

1.1 Project Initiation

1.2 Project Schedule and Management

1.3 Meetings and Coordination

1.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

1.5 Documentation and Grant Compliance
Task 2 - Existing Conditions Analysis

2.1 Review of Existing Plans and Data

2.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory

2.3 Field Review and Reconnaissance

2.4 Safety and Traffic Context Review

2.5 Connectivity and Accessibility Analysis
Task 3 - Field Review and Constraints Analysis

3.1 Right -of -Way Review and Feasibility Analysis

3.2 Corridor and Intersection Assessment

3.3 Physical and Operational Constraints

3.4 Planning -Level ADA and Accessibility Considerations Task 4 - Policy, Plan, and Standards Review

4.1 Review of City Plans and Policies

4.2 Review of Regional and State Guidance

4.3 Review of Design Standards and Guidelines

4.4 Policy Consistency Assessment
Task 5 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Development

5.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Framework

5.2 Connectivity and Access

5.3 Safety -Driven Network Development

5.4 Corridor Prioritization and Phasing

5.5 Planning -Level Cost Considerations
Task 6 - Conceptual Design and Plan Development

6.1 Conceptual Design Development

6.2 Mapping and Exhibits
Task 7 - Community and Stakeholder Engagement

7.1 Community Engagement Strategy

7.2 Public Outreach Activities

7.3 Stakeholder Coordination

7.4 Documentation of Public Input
Task 8 - Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.1 Draft Bicycle Master Plan

8.2 Implementation Strategy

8.3 Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.4 City Council Presentation and Approval
Task 9 - Project Closeout and Grant Documentation

9.1 Final Review and Approvals

9.2 Grant Documentation Support

9.3 Project Closeout
Fully Loaded Rate
Fehr Et Peers (Prime)
Donna
Jason Pack
Lewandowski
Principal -in -
Project
Charge
Manaaer
$220.00 $385.00
Matt
Benjamin
Technical
Su000rt
$380.00
Jolene Hayes Trevor Lien Claude Strayer
Technical Planning Engineering
Support Lead Lead
$315.00 $220.00 $320.00
2 1
14 2
30 4
4 4 4
14 2
4 8
4 2
2 2
2 2
2 1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
4 2
6 4
4 8
4 2
2 8
2 2
2 4
2 4
2 2
2 2
2 8
2 2
2 2
2 8
2 2
2 4
8 4 4 4 60
8 2 4 2 16
4 2 4 2 20
4 2
4 4
4 1
4 1
4 4
4 4
4 4
12 20
4 Total Without Optional Tasks
175 51 34 18 116 60
Optional Tasks
Optional Task 1- Community Walk Audits (2)
Optional Task 2 - Common Crash Profiles (Bicycle and Pedestrian) Optional Task 3 - Detailed Concept Designs and Cost Estimates Optional Task 4 - Grant Support
Optional Task 5 - Addendum to the General Plan
10 8
8 4 6
8 2 2
12 8 4
4 20
8 4
12 4
Total With All Optional Tasks
FALSE 65 46 22 144 80
Notes:

Actual billing rate at the time of service may vary depending on the final staffing plan at the time the project starts; the overall fee will not be exceeded.

Mileage is billed at the IRS rate plus 10% handling fee.

All other direct and subconsultant expenses are billed with 10% handling fee.

Other direct costs such as computer, communications, and reproduction charges are billed as a percentage of labor.

Rates and staff are subject to change at any time, without notice, and within the total budget shown 2 Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan

Kristin Brown
Outreach
Lead
$200.00
Planner/
Engineer III
$190.00
Graphics/GIS
Project
Coordinator
$240.00 $165.00
Labor
Hours
Direct Labor
Costs
Direct
Costs
Total
16 30
120
40 24
4 4
12 8
8 4
2 2
4 12
12 4
2 2
2 8
16 4
1 6 $1,430 $70 $1,500
2 18 $4,180 $210 $4,390
7 65 $14,255 $710 $14,965
2 14 $4,650 $230 $4,880
2 16 $3,410 $170 $3,580
1 9 $2,135 $110 $2,245
1 9 $1,805 $90 $1,895
3 23 $4,535 $230 $4,765
3 27 $5,775 $290 $6,065
3 29 $6,615 $330 $6,945
12 $3,230 $160 $3,390
10 $2,750 $140 $2,890
9 $2,365 $120 $2,485
9 $2,365 $120 $2,485
9 $1,970 $100 $2,070
7 $1,590 $80 $1,670
11 $2,870 $140 $3,010
12 $2,630 $130 $2,760
1 11 $3,205 $160 $3,365
1 11 $2,525 $130 $2,655
3 27 $6,415 $320 $6,735
2 16 $4,330 $220 $4,550
2 20 $5,810 $290 $6,100
16 7 65
12 22
$17,565 $880 $18,445
6 52 $12,240 $610 $12,850
4 36 $7,100 $360 $7,460
15 137 $26,915 $3,100 $30,015
7 59 $12,455 $620 $13,075
4 32 $6,670 $330 $7,000
20 13 113 $26,225 $1,310 $27,535
16 6 54 $12,230 $610 $12,840
8 5 45 $10,945 $550 $11,495
16 3 25 $5,985 $300 $6,285
9 $2,585
6 $1,430
6 $1,430
$130
$70
$70
$2,715
$1,500
$1,500
230 92 128 115
1,019
$234,620
$13,490
$248,110
20 20
12 12
12 6 56
4 36
5 47
6 54
4 32
$11,390
$8,340
$13,125
$12,240
$9,160
$570
$420
$660
$610
$460
$11,960
$8,760
$13,785
$12,850
$9,620
230 132 164 140
1,023
$288,875
$16,210
$305,085
Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 3

Fehr & Peers
Proposal for City of
Beaumont Bicycle &
Pedestrian Master Plan
Prepared for:

City of Beaumont
I
Submitted on:

March 23, 2026
Submitted by:

Fehr & Peers

A. Cover Letter
March 23, 2026
Re: Request for Proposal for
Planning & Design Services for
the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master
Plan Update
Barbara Mason
Purchasing Manager
City of Beaumont
[email protected]
2025 Client
Feedback
Client survey results show
we consistently met or
exceeded expectations:
99% in quality
98% in value
99% in service
100% say they would use us again
Dear Barbara,
Fehr& Peers
We love working with Beaumont. Since completing the City's Mobility Element in 2020, we have enjoyed helping the City with critical issues that are important both to residents and elected officials. This has included implementation of aspects of the Mobility Element, serving as an extension of City staff related to reviewing studies submitted for development projects, and working on critically needed infrastructure like the I-10/Highland Springs and I-10/Oak Valley interchanges. Our deep understanding of all modes of travel in Beaumont has helped us better inform and advise City decision makers for each of those projects.

The Mobility Element took a thoughtful approach to implementing a layered network of complete streets. Coming into this project with an understanding of these layers, and the context for which modes should be prioritized on each street, sets us up for success as we approach this new Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

However, some things have changed since the Mobility Element was completed, including our work on a much more focused truck route study, the results of which did suggest modifications to the truck system. One of the key components of this effort will be to take a more detailed look at the pedestrian and bicycle planned systems and ensure that we separate those vulnerable users from heavy vehicle truck routes to maximize safety on those streets.

Other important factors to be addressed as part of this effort include the City's recent assessment of the downtown area of 6th Street, the massive industrial development activity that has occurred in the southwest part of the City, and safe access for kids to schools. This is the optimum time to complete this effort, and we believe we are the right firm to do this for the City of Beaumont.

Our internal team consists of both planners and engineers. This blend ensures that the plan includes policy language and direction for implementation, but also ensures that any treatments we propose on City streets can be delivered in a practical way. Furthermore, many members of our team (including myself) already know the City, City Council, and other key stakeholders, as well as city processes and regulations. All of this will allow us to hit the ground running, and ultimately increase the value of the project for the City. Donna Lewandowski, our project manager, served as an Active Transportation Planner for local and state governments for 20 years. She brings a deep understanding of public agency needs and processes as well as the needs of the community. She is also a certified Road Safety Professional 2 in the Behavioral discipline (RSP2B).

Please note that I am authorized to negotiate contracts on behalf of Fehr & Peers. As such, please coordinate directly with me (contact 2 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

information is below).

Jason D. Pack, P.E.

Principal
3880 Lemon Street, Suite 420
Riverside, CA 92501
951.274.4800
[email protected]
I will note that, although I am authorized to negotiate the contract on behalf of Fehr & Peers, if our contractual fee is over $250,000 the contract will need to be signed by a vice president of the firm. As such, Sarah Brandenberg, P.E., a vice president of our firm has co- signed this letter to affirm our commitment to the City of Beaumont, acknowledge the accuracy of the information contained within this proposal, and she will be the one ultimately executing the contract (if needed).

We affirm that the information above is accurate and that Sarah and I have the ability to negotiate and execute a contract with the City as required. We further certify that Fehr & Peers, under penalty of perjury, complies with nondiscrimination requirements of the State and Federal Government.

If you have any questions or concerns about our proposal, please reach out directly. Otherwise, we hope to continue to improve the community of Beaumont!
Sincerely,

FEHR & PEERS
Jason D. Pack, PE
Principal
Fehr & Peers
Sarah Brandenberg, TE
Vice President
Fehr & Peers
Putting People First in Every
Solution
Whether it's people or goods,
we work with communities
to plan for safe, efficient
movement that supports
their needs. We strive to be
national leaders in planning,
engineering, research, and
operations, and work to
remain at the forefront of
transportation technology,
policy, and design.

Recognizing the diverse
needs and different ways
our transportation systems
work for people, our data -
driven strategies help clients
confidently reach their goals,
creating lasting impact for all
members of the communities
we serve.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 3

Table
of Contents
Technical Proposal
B

Cover Letter
Page :a
Key Staff

Introduction/
Information
E

Firm Profile
F

Scope of Services Approach
G H

Additional Information References Resumes
Appendix
Sample Project Sheets Page 4-3
This proposal reads like a
book.

We've adjusted the settings
to two -page spread view to
make your digital reading
experience more enjoyable.

Happy reading!
4 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

B. Introduction/Information
At Fehr & Peers, we are passionate about
transforming transportation consulting through
innovation and creativity. We derive inspiration
from partnering with communities like Beaumont
to understand and help them shape local
transportation futures objectively tailored to their
unique community needs. Above all, we prioritize
these relationships.

As we grow, our commitment to inclusive, local,
and long-term community partnerships remains
central to our philosophy. Together with our clients,
we are motivated by shared success, and the
positive impact our work has on the communities
we serve. Improving communities is at the heart of
everything that Fehr & Peers does.

With a local office in Riverside, we are familiar
with the western Riverside region. We know that
Beaumont is one of California's fastest -growing
cities, with a population increase of over 17% since
2020, when we worked with the City to prepare
the Mobility Element of the Elevate Beaumont
2040 General Plan Update. We understand how
high rates of community growth present many
challenges to Cities and City Staff. It can be difficult to find a balance that provides for the infrastructure
needs of the community, while protecting the
things that make Beaumont, Beaumont —the
rural mountain environment, the small-town
community feel, and access to the things that
make a community and its residents able to live
a healthy and vibrant life: good jobs, recreational
opportunities, and community services.

Beaumont residents and visitors alike desire safe,
connected, and enjoyable networks for walking,
rolling, or bicycling. This project presents a major
opportunity for the City of Beaumont to develop
an updated, comprehensive Bicycle & Pedestrian
Master Plan (Plan) that will enhance the existing
transportation network by integrating bicycle and
pedestrian improvements using a context -sensitive
approach. The Elevate Beaumont Mobility Element
included a Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Network
map. This new project represents a chance to
build on that preliminary work, to develop a
comprehensive and cohesive network for active
transportation users.

Together, we can build an extensive citywide
plan with a complete bicycle and pedestrian
network that connects residents and visitors to
both everyday services and outdoor recreation
amenities. We can build a plan that will identify and
prioritize a community and data -driven vision for
safe, inviting, multi -modal transportation in and
around the City, while providing City staff with the
resources and tools needed to secure funding for
implementation.

Data -Driven, Locally Grounded Deliverables
We approach bicycle and pedestrian network
planning with a data -driven methodology based
on state and federal best practices documents,
such as the FHWA's Bikeway Selection Guide.

This methodology will set the baseline, but all
recommendations will be grounded in the local
context of Beaumont.

The Team
Our team is structured to deliver the full range of
services requested, blending expertise in active
transportation planning and design, as well as
thoughtful community engagement. The team
includes both planners and engineers. Some
already know the city well and can provide detailed
local understanding, while others will bring an
outside perspective to the planning process.

Expert Knowledge
From our work on similar plans, we recognize
several considerations that will be especially
important for this project. First, acknowledging
local history and maintaining the character
of the community through context -sensitive
recommendations is essential for a successful
plan. Second, every street has unique physical
challenges that require both creativity and
engineering expertise. Lastly, knowledge of grant
funding sources and scoring is paramount to
project prioritization, so that impactful walking
and biking improvements can be advanced to
implementation.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 5

C. Firm Profile
Fehr & Peers
We are a California -based S Corporation providing transportation planning and engineering services, with 25 offices and over 400 staff nationwide. Since 1985, we've partnered with public and private clients to design safer, more effective ways for people and goods to move —creating spaces where everyone can thrive, today and for generations to come.

Bringing together data, technology, and the lived experiences of the communities we serve, we help clients make confident, well-informed decisions. Along the way, we've earned national recognition for raising the bar on how transportation projects are planned, designed, and delivered. Many of our first clients still trust us with their transportation needs after decades of collaboration —a testament to the strong partnerships we build and the innovative mindset we bring to every project. We don't just follow trends —we help clients anticipate what's next.

LOCATION OF

THE PRINCIPAL

OFFICE THAT WILL

BE RESPONSIBLE

FOR THE

IMPLEMENTATION

OF THIS

CONTRACT
3880 Lemon Street
Suite 420
Riverside, CA 92501
954.274.4800
• Year Founded: 1985
• Form: S -Corporation
• Number of Employees:
403
• Number of Offices: 25
Services Offered
With a blend of multimodal expertise, national perspective, and local insight fueled by our strong and longstanding relationships, we tailor solutions across a wide range of services to meet each community's unique needs.

Active Transportation
Climate Resilience & Evacuation
Community Engagement & Equity
Complete Streets
Curbside Management
Data Science
Emerging Technologies
Engineering & Design
Freight & Goods Movement
Grant Funding
Land Use & Transportation
Multimodal Operations Analysis
Parking
Public Lands & Recreation
Safe Routes to School
Safe System & Vision Zero
Sports Venues & Special Events
Transit Planning
Transportation Demand Management
Transportation Economics
Travel Behavior Forecasting
Visual Storytelling
VMT Impacts
6 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr & Peers Office Locations and Number of Staff
Fehr & Peers has 25 offices nationwide, ranging in size from 2 to 56 employees each. This includes five branch offices in Southern California (Riverside, Orange County, Los Angeles, Long Beach and San Diego).

We will primarily serve the City of Beaumont from our Riverside office and will supplement it with support from our other Southern California offices.
00 •00000.•
0000 •••000,.00•.
6000 0.0000••0000.0.00
600 0041000060041600606000,190110000001,60001100041000 .••••.•..•.• 01.00•••••0••••••••••••••1.0.0.••• 0 •0e 0000.••..0..000.00••000.00.0.00.01.000•.00.•10•••
•••...••••••.••••..••0.•.•.•••..•.••.••.,••..•.00..• •
0 ...........•..es6..e..........................• .00 00• • �•••..•....•e...•••..........1.••••.•••.••••••••••••••••..f 00 0000000000000,00000000004100000,600000004000000110000000000 •0•.00..0•.0••0,0•.•00.000.00000.00••0.0•.0.0.00.06.00.00.. •.••••••••••••.•••••e•••..•••••••.•••.•••••••.••••.•.•••.•• •,u •.•1.••.•.0.16.•••000•./•0,•••0•►0.••0•••1.•1.0••1./.0.1••• •04.

0.600•••••0 ••.•.•.00•••0••••••••••.••••••1••••••.•.•..•• ••••c 000000.0060 ••••.••••••.•••.••••••••.•.•••••••.•••••••••• •••••9 ••000000000 ..••••••••••••••••..••••••.•••.•.•..•►.•••... ••0000► ••••000.1•.0,•••01••6.60.1••.0••1•••.••.••••••0•••.••0.0••• •.00061 ••••••••.•••••.•••.•••••••.•••.•••••01••••0.•••.0..••••0•• •00000 •000.60.0600• 000000000000600000000000000000000,00000000000000000000000000 00600 .•116••••••16

4.0•.•••••••••••0••••••••••••.•••••••••••••.••••0••0••••••• 0.••00 ••100..1.0.0•. ,009••0,.•0•••00.000•••0.0.0.0••••00.000.0••00.00000.000••••• 000••••0••••••0••••••. --.71•••0,6••0,0.0, •••••.•.6.06••610...•.••1•.•.•6••600•.•••0,.6••6•••••••••.•0••• •••.•••••••0 .•0.•0.000.11.00.6•.•06••.•010•..••••..•0•••1••..•6.0•••0•••• 0000060006.00000011111•.•1•.•.•.••..•10...••••••....••.•6••.•.•••1•.••.•••0100• 161 .464,00000000000000000000 ••••0,.009000••60,•••••0.6.1•••••••.•1••1•••..•. e1 •1.1••11•••..•.1••1.•• •••••01••1.1.1•.1••1••11••1.11••1.1.11•.•.1.1•••333•• .1•.•.0..•••..••..•.•1• 0•••01.0.0010••••••••.•.6...1•.•...•••.....1.1..•... 61••.6.1••...•..•••••66 0000•••.00.0,060.0.•.0.0.•00.••00.100•..000•..6.0.06 .••••••16••1.•••••••1.•••••1••••••0••••.•.•••••••1••••••••.111••/•10•••1••••• :0••6•....•.•00.61.6.0•••..6••6.61••.•...••6.0......••...6.•••••.••0••.6...•• 9••.•.•••••1.661.1.11••.••••....•.•1••11•••.•••..•.••••1.•.••••1••••6.1••••.• .e/00••0000.10100••000.0.0••00•.•000000•••.00••0.0.••110••000.00.101.0..•0.00•• •a••••/ e•... 0. 0000.0.•••.••••••••••0••••0•••••1.00.••.••••.•00. 0••.• e.•...•••001 ^"toveseese••••••••••••••••••.•••••0.0.0eeeeee0•••••••••00.0•••••••0•••••••••• •••••••0.0••••0•••••0•••.•••v••••••••••0••••0.••••..•••6••.•.••••••••.• D•06•••••••••.•••••e••••••••••••00006.60•••••.•0,.•••0•.6•.•••0•.se•00•• ! ! 49060.•10...•0.060.•0.01.01..•e.•e•.e..1.•0.•1.••..•e••••..6•.•..••se

00.•0000.000.00000•.0.6000..0000.0••••0000.010.0000000.0000000600.0 >•••.000.00..1/•••0...0.•06.•.0•►00.0000000.0•.••0•••.0010•••••00,•• ! -.a•.••►••0•appppespspeasolDppeeopve•ps1••0••0••00.0000.0•,0.00000000• 70000006.© •.•••••••1.•••.••••e•••••••
000 9.00.0,••0,6.0,0,.6.00.9.909•••

10... - .. Q ••66.6.66••6••6.66••1••••.
•p►or9irv6ralvgolr•vviouv (0.0000•••00,0.00•••0.1.10•
seeeresl •10.0.00.1 0 •••00•..•0.0000.000.0.000•

0.0.041006► _,0••6.00•••6.0000•.•••0.0.60
••.•••••••e 060990••.••••••.•••••6••.0•.6.00•
•.6.000000000• 000006000000000000006 •• 069.6
•0,060006600.00••0000.0000.1.060 • ••
•0660••6•••00.00.•66••.0•.••1.•6 •
•e••. 9040.000•0004 •• • 00 •
V000
O`n
O
Office
Locations
Portland
Seattle
Tacoma
Roseville
Sacramento
Stockton
Rocky Mountain South
(Boise
Boulder
Denver
Salt Lake City
Dallas
Orlando
Tampa
.ogee*
•00000,
00•..09
96000'00,1►,
•6666.4
..••e•66,
••66666.66.0
600000••066.
6006000606 9
000
e..

Bay Area Southwest
Oakland
Petaluma
San Francisco
San Jose
Walnut Creek
East
Washington D.C.

Los Angeles
Long Beach
Orange County
Phoenix
Riverside
San Diego
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 7

D. Key Staff
Brief Biographies
Jason Pack, PE

PRINCIPAL I PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE
Jason is a Principal at Fehr & Peers with more than 26 years of experience delivering transportation planning and engineering solutions for communities across California.

As Principal -in -Charge, Jason will provide strategic oversight and senior technical guidance, drawing on extensive experience with corridor plans, active transportation studies, and multimodal mobility analyses. He has completed more than 20 projects for the City of Beaumont, including circulation planning, corridor studies, and transportation peer reviews, giving him a strong understanding of the City's transportation network and planning priorities. Jason also brings deep expertise in travel demand analysis, VMT assessment, and multimodal corridor planning, helping agencies develop implementable strategies that support safer, more connected bicycle and pedestrian networks.

Donna Lewandowski

ASSOCIATE I PROJECT MANAGER
Donna has more than 22 years of experience advancing transportation safety, active transportation, and public health initiatives. She brings extensive project management experience leading multimodal planning efforts that integrate data -driven safety analysis, field assessments, and community engagement to develop practical recommendations for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Donna has managed numerous safety and active transportation studies, including Complete Streets safety assessments and Safe Routes to School programs across Southern California, where she led collision analysis, corridor evaluations, and stakeholder coordination to develop implementable improvement strategies. Her background working with state and local agencies provides a strong understanding of agency processes and grant -funded planning efforts, helping communities translate planning recommendations into projects that enhance safety, connectivity, and accessibility for all roadway users.

Matt Benjamin

PRINCIPAL I TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Matt brings more than 20 years of experience advancing multimodal transportation and safety initiatives across Southern California. For this project, Matt will provide technical support informed by his extensive work on active transportation plans, Safe Routes to School programs, and pedestrian safety studies. His experience includes leading complex multimodal planning efforts that integrate collision analysis, field assessments, and community engagement to develop practical safety improvements and connected bicycle and pedestrian networks. Matt has helped cities develop implementable strategies that prioritize safety, improve access to schools and transit, and position communities for active transportation grant funding. 8 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Jolene Hayes

PRINCIPAL I TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Jolene has more than 26 years of experience in transportation planning, land use, and mobility policy development. For this project, Jolene will provide technical support informed by her extensive work on circulation and mobility element updates, multimodal planning, and corridor studies throughout Southern California. Her experience includes evaluating transportation networks, integrating bicycle and pedestrian facilities into broader mobility plans, and working with communities and agencies to balance safety, accessibility, and economic needs. Jolene also brings direct experience working with the City of Beaumont, where she led the Beaumont Truck Routing Study, providing valuable insight into the City's transportation system and planning priorities.

Trevor Lien

SENIOR ENGINEER/PLANNER I PLANNING LEAD
Trevor has spent more than a decade delivering data -driven active transportation and multimodal planning projects across Southern California. As Planning Lead, Trevor will guide the development of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan using a data - driven approach that integrates safety analysis, network connectivity evaluation, and implementable design strategies. His experience includes leading and supporting bicycle master plans, active transportation plans, and multimodal implementation strategies for agencies such as the Orange County Transportation Authority, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, and the City of San Diego.

Trevor's work focuses on identifying network gaps, prioritizing improvements, and developing feasible bicycle and pedestrian recommendations that position communities for successful implementation and future funding.

Claude Strayer

PRINCIPAL I ENGINEERING LEAD
Claude is a transportation engineer with more than 16 years of experience designing multimodal roadway improvements that enhance safety and accessibility for people walking and biking. As Engineering Lead, Claude will guide the development of planning -level design concepts and feasibility assessments for recommended bicycle and pedestrian improvements. His experience includes the design of bikeways, intersection treatments, traffic signal upgrades, signing and striping plans, and sidewalk improvements, with work supporting complete streets initiatives and active transportation projects across the country. Claude regularly leads multidisciplinary teams in developing concept designs and preparing implementation -ready materials that help agencies move bicycle and pedestrian improvements from planning into delivery.

Kristin Brown

SENIOR ENGINEER/PLANNER I OUTREACH
Kristin Brown has ten years of experience designing and leading community engagement programs that support inclusive, people -focused transportation planning.

As Outreach Lead, Kristin will guide engagement for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, building on her experience delivering outreach for active transportation and Safe Routes to School initiatives. She has led stakeholder interviews, workshops, pop-up events, and data -driven engagement strategies that connect with residents, businesses, and community groups, and translate input into actionable recommendations. Kristin's approach emphasizes meeting people where they are, elevating diverse perspectives, and helping agencies develop bicycle and pedestrian plans that reflect community priorities and support successful implementation.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 9

E. Scope of Services
Fehr & Peers' extensive prior work for the City of
Beaumont has given us a thorough understanding
of transportation in the City. Being able to build
on the analysis and mapping performed for these
previous studies (including the current Circulation
Element, and the recent Truck Route Study) will
allow us to focus more time and effort on providing
solutions, developing concepts and creating
materials that will directly translate into impactful
grant applications.

Task 1— Project
Management
Task 1.1 Project Initiation
Fehr & Peers will facilitate a kick-off meeting
with the Beaumont Project Management team to
review project communication protocols, schedule,
scope of work, and data needs. This meeting will
also serve as our first opportunity to hear from
City staff on their overall vision for the project and
any context that the project team should keep
front and center, such as any new or ongoing
transportation projects, industrial developments
and truck routes, market conditions, or design
concerns.

We will work with City staff to determine the
optimal composition of a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC). Once convened, this
committee will serve in an advisory capacity for
the development of the Master Plan by helping
to determine the goals and targets of the Plan,
incorporating input from other agencies and
stakeholders, and providing feedback during key
phases of Plan development.

Task 1.2 Project Schedule
and Management
Fehr & Peers will work with City staff to finalize a
detailed project schedule that identifies meeting
schedules, key milestones and deliverables. As
Project Manager, Donna will be responsible for
monitoring schedule adherence and managing
the workload and resource assignments of the
technical team. The schedule will be monitored
and updated as necessary throughout the project
period, in coordination with City staff. Fehr &
Peers will closely track the project budget, using
monthly progress reports as a ledger of work
completed, and a check -in point with Beaumont to
demonstrate project progress.

Task 1.3 Meetings and Coordination
Fehr & Peers will set up recurring conference calls
with the Beaumont Project Management team
for the duration of the project, using Microsoft
Teams or another platform if preferred by the City.

Early on, these meetings may be used for focused
discussions on urgent topics such as data needs,
goals and objectives, the composition of the BPAC,
upcoming outreach, etc. Other calls may be used
simply for updates on progress. The calls will be
bi-weekly for the majority of the project schedule,
through the development of the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Network (Task 5). After that, we have
assumed that coordination calls can be monthly,
with additional communication on an as -needed
basis. We will provide agendas in advance of each
meeting and share meeting notes with participants
within one business day following each meeting.

In addition to regular management conference
calls, we anticipate four meetings with the BPAC
during the project period. We envision these
meetings to be held in person with a call -in option,
but can be held entirely virtually if preferred. We
will fine-tune the topics for each BPAC meeting,
but these may include:

Session 1: Introduce the project to the committee,
help them understand the overall role of the BPAC,
and the expectations of being a member. Provide
input on the community engagement strategy and
public outreach activities.

Session 2: Set the goals and targets for the Plan,
and identify opportunities for —and challenges to —
improved bicycle and pedestrian access.

Session 3: Interactive review of the recommended
10 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Bicycle and Pedestrian Network, and corridor
prioritization methodology.

Session 4: Interactive review of the Draft Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan, and provide input on
potential implementation strategies.

The sessions described above are intended to
provide an example of how the series of BPAC
meetings could be designed. Our team is open to
other engagement strategies, and looks forward to
working with the City to refine the role of the BPAC
and meeting progression.

Additionally, we anticipate up to 3 meetings
with other agencies or stakeholder groups not
represented on the BPAC, to gather additional
relevant information.

Task 1.4 Quality Assurance
and Quality Control
At Fehr & Peers, we recognize that our technical
analysis is important, but so is the way the
methods and results are communicated, as well
as the process by which the work is reviewed for
quality assurance and control.

At the core of the QC process is a hierarchy of
staff that are responsible for various aspects of
each project. The following hierarchy may be
employed on any given project depending on the
project requirements and resources.

The Principal -in -Charge (PIC) provides oversight,
review, and strategic direction on the study as
necessary.

The Project Manager (PM) is responsible for
the overall quality of the study, and adherence to
schedule and budget. The PM is the primary point
of contact for the client.

The Project Engineer/Planner conducts the
technical calculations, prepares reports, and
supports the PM.

Experts are individuals that have considerable
experience on specific topics and are available to
collaborate on innovative solutions to a variety of
planning and operational problems.

Our Technical/Administrative Staff includes
individuals who prepare high -quality graphics,
process reports, set up conference calls, and
conduct other project -related activities as
necessary. This staff allows our engineers and
project managers to focus on the technical
analysis.

Quality control and quality assurance are
provided through structured internal review
processes, including review by the project team
and, when appropriate, review by staff external
to the core project team. Work quality will be
managed through detailed written work plans
based on Fehr & Peers' recommended practices
and senior staff review of all deliverables.

Task 1.5 Documentation
and Grant Compliance
Fehr & Peers has completed numerous projects
funded through the SB 821 program, and is
well versed in the grant eligibility requirements
and documentation needs for reimbursement.

Project progress and completion supporting
documentation will be provided.

TASK 1 DELIVERABLES
Meeting Agendas
Draft and Final Meeting Minutes
Documentation required for grant compliance
Task 2 - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Task 2.1 Review of Existing
Plans and Data
Fehr & Peers' recent transportation planning work
for the City of Beaumont, including the Mobility
Element of the Elevate Beaumont 2040 General
Plan Update and the 2024 Truck Route Study, as
well as the WRCOG Active Transportation Plan,
has provided Fehr & Peers a comprehensive
understanding of the transportation policy
landscape, existing plans, and available data,
not only within the City but also within the entire
western Riverside region. We will build on these
prior efforts, by identifying and documenting any
new or updated policies or plans relevant to this
project.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 11

The Fehr & Peers team is already familiar with
national and state best practices in active
transportation planning and complete streets
design and we will incorporate appropriate best
practices into the ATP.

Task 2.2 Existing Bicycle and
Pedestrian Facilities Inventory
For the Elevate Beaumont 2040 General Plan
Update, we inventoried the existing bicycle
network and identified a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Priority Network. We will build on this work,
identifying and mapping changes to the existing
network that have occurred within the past five
years.

Task 2.3 Field Review and
Reconnaissance
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory
created in Task 2.2 will be verified through a
combination of review of up-to-date aerial
imagery and field observation. Potential barriers
and constraints will be noted and documented
along the existing network.

Task 2.4 Safety and Traffic
Context Review
To analyze transportation safety within the City
of Beaumont, we will review the most recent five
years of publicly available crash data from the
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) at
UC Berkeley SafeTREC. Analysis will include injury
crashes of all modes, but will focus on crashes
involving people walking and biking. The resulting
safety analysis will identify factors common among
crashes in the City, particularly as pertains to
bicycle and pedestrian safety. This analysis will
consider factors such as:

Crash locations in relation to key walking and
bicycling destinations, such as parks, schools,
and entertainment areas.

Types of crashes, such as broadside and rear -
end.

Primary collision factors
Proximity to intersections,
Time of day
Presence of lighting
This analysis will generate graphs and charts of
common crash characteristics and a hot -spot map
of injury crash locations by mode.

Task 2.5 Connectivity and
Accessibility Analysis
We will overlay the existing bicycle and pedestrian
facility network with the crash analysis from
Task 2.4 and maps of key walking and bicycling
destinations such as schools, entertainment
centers and recreational facilities; and transit
routes and stops. This will allow us to identify
where barriers such as difficult roadway crossings,
geographical features, or network gaps exist.

TASK 2 DELIVERABLES
Existing Conditions Memorandum summarizing:

Existing plans and data review
Existing bicycle and pedestrian network
Field review findings
Crash and hot spot analysis
Connectivity analysis
Task 3 - Field
Review and
Constraints
Analysis
Task 3.1 Right -of -Way Review
and Feasibility Analysis
The ease with which bicycle and pedestrian
facility improvements can be made often rests
on the availability of sufficient existing pavement
width and rights -of -way. Acquiring additional
easements and rights -of -way can significantly
increase the cost and complexity of a roadway
project. The Fehr & Peers team will gather
available data sets to review roadway widths and
right-of-way easements for the transportation
network in Beaumont. We will use these to
determine locations where bicycle and pedestrian
improvements might be possible within the
existing corridor width, and locations where
acquiring additional easements or rights -of -way
12 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

may be required to move a proposed project
forward.

Task 3.2 Corridor and
Intersection Assessment
For key corridors and intersections, we will
conduct planning level assessments to determine
constraints that are likely to affect facility
implementation, such as geographic features that
limit the ability to widen a roadway or sidewalk,
difficult crossing conditions, and locations where
alternative design treatments may overcome these
limitations.

Task 3.3 Physical and
Operational Constraints
Preexisting infrastructure —such as utility
placement, drainage features, or other structures —
can also constrain the ability to implement bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. Contextual roadway
features such as vehicle speed, traffic volumes,
and multiple turn lanes can influence the types
of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is
appropriate and implementable. These can also
affect construction costs and schedules. Fehr &
Peers will identify and document these potential
barriers and constraints along key corridors.

Task 3.4 Planning Level ADA and
Accessibility Considerations
Accessibility considerations related to potential
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, such as
the existence and placement of ADA-compliant
curb ramps, and steeps grades can impact the
types of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that can
be implemented. Fehr & Peers will identify and
document these considerations at a planning level.

TASK 3 DELIVERABLES
Technical Memorandum summarizing the
findings from Tasks 3.1 through 3.4
Supporting maps and exhibits, as necessary,
to illustrate the findings summarized in the
Technical Memo
Task 4 - Policy,
Plan, and
Standards Review
Task 4.1 Review of City
Plans and Policies
The Fehr & Peers team will review the City of
Beaumont Plans and Policies identified in Task 2.1.

Our review will consider the following factors:

Support of safety and active transportation in
City infrastructure
Requirements for including safety and active
transportation in new development
Engagement with and education of the
community in support of safety and active
transportation
Historic (last five years) and planned funding
for projects and programs to improve roadway
safety and increase walking and biking
Alignment with the Safe System Approach
Task 4.2 Review of Regional
and State Guidance
Regional and state plans and guidance for bicycle
and pedestrian planning include the WRCOG
Active Transportation Plan developed by Fehr
& Peers, Alta Planning and Raimi + Associates
in 2018, the Southern California Association of
Governments' (SCAG) Connect SoCal 2024
Plan, and Caltrans documents "Toward an Active
California" and the Highway Design Manual. We
will review regional and state -level bicycle and
pedestrian planning documents with a focus on
alignment between City plans and policies and
state and regional priorities, particularly as they are reflected in potential funding sources.

Task 4.3 Review of Design
Standards and Guidelines
The Fehr & Peers team is well informed on state
and national design standards for bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, including the national Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, llth Edition
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 13

Revision 1 (MUTCD), effective December 2025,
the California MUTCD effective in January 2026,
the AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and
Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, 2nd Edition
(2021), the AASHTO Guide for the Development
of Bicycle Facilities, 5th Edition (2024) and the
NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2025). These
plans will be reviewed for their applicability to the
Beaumont context to inform project -level designs
for bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the City.

Task 4.4 Policy Consistency
Assessment
Consistency between the policies and guidelines
reviewed in Tasks 4.1 through 4.3 will be assessed
as they pertain to the goals defined for this
new Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, as
developed through this planning process. Any
inconsistencies will be catalogued in this task, and
recommendations for reconciling them will be
included in the Final Plan.

TASK 4 DELIVERABLES
Technical Memorandum documenting findings
from the plan and policy review, with summary
tables
Task 5 - Bicycle
and Pedestrian
Network
Development
Task 5.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Network Framework
The Mobility Element of the Elevate Beaumont
2040 General Plan used a layered approach
to develop a network that meets the needs
of all roadway users. We will build off of this
contextual understanding of which modes should
be prioritized on which streets, and consider
additional elements such as proximity to bicycle
and pedestrian destinations and generators such
as schools and parks, roadway widths, speeds and
constraints, safety considerations, modifications
recommended in the recent Truck Route Study,
industrial development in the southwest part of the
City, and the City's assessment of the downtown
area of 6th Street. We believe that a framework
for developing a complete bicycle and pedestrian
network that takes all of these considerations into
account will best serve the City of Beaumont.

Task 5.2 Connectivity and Access
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Network developed
for this Plan should be prioritized to serve the
destinations people want to access most via active
transportation modes. These destinations will be
identified by the Community and Stakeholder
Engagement tasks, but generally include schools,
parks, entertainment destinations, neighborhood
services and transit stops. The Connectivity and
Accessibility Analysis performed in Task 2.4 will
form the basis for this task to ensure that priority is given to closing gaps in connectivity from housing
areas to these destinations.

Task 5.3 Safety -Driven
Network Development
When people do not feel safe and comfortable
using active transportation modes, they often
opt for vehicular travel. While not always the
case, high -crash corridors and intersections
will be avoided by bicyclists and pedestrians,
and represent barriers to choosing active travel.

Building on the hot -spot map created in Task 2.4,
we will identify a high -injury network (HIN). The
resulting safety analysis will identify intersections
and corridors within the city with high rates of
serious crashes. This network will be prioritized
based on a system of factor weighting we will
develop in collaboration with the BPAC. Common
weight considerations include injury severity,
bicyclist or pedestrian involvement, children and
older adults, and proximity to schools and parks.

Task 5.4 Corridor Prioritization
and Phasing
The primary purpose of this task will be to
prioritize the top corridors or intersections for
interventions that will be developed further in
Task 6. We will create a prioritization framework
based on the high -injury network developed in
Task 5.3, combined with other priorities the City
wishes to include. Examples of characteristics
that can be used in the prioritization methodology
14 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

are key locations for pedestrian and bicycle trip
generators, and locations that would increase
network connectivity or reduce gaps and barriers.

This methodology will be used to prioritize
locations and develop recommended facility
concepts and designs for the network. We
will examine factors like context, street and
intersection configurations, and national, state, and
local guidance. Recommendations will be stratified
using the FHWA's Safe System Roadway Design
Hierarchy (FHWA-SA-22-069).

SAFE SYSTEM

ROADWAY DESIGN

HIERARCHY

TIER REMOVE SEVERE
1 CONFLICTS
1MM

TIER REDUCE VEHICLE
2 SPEEDS
EMI
TIER
3 MANAGE CONFLICTS

IN TIME

TIER INCREASE ATTENTIVENESS
4 AND AWARENESS
Task 5.5 Planning -Level
Cost Considerations
The Fehr & Peers team will develop planning level
cost considerations for the facility concepts and
designs developed in Task 5.4.

TASK 5 DELIVERABLES
Draft Bicycle Network maps and exhibits
Summary of corridor prioritization and phasing
Technical Memorandum documenting network
development, phasing, and recommendations
Task 6 -
Conceptual
Design and Plan
Development
Task 6.1 Conceptual
Design Development
The Fehr & Peers team will develop recommended
conceptual designs for the top 5 priority corridors
or locations identified in Task 5. Recommended
designs will be based on context, priority modes
identified for each corridor, and technical
feasibility. Priority corridors and locations will be
sorted by facility classification and priority mode.

Cross sections will be developed for each facility
type, depicting average right-of-way width and
proposed configurations that show travel lanes,
parking, shoulders, curb/gutter, sidewalk and bike
path, and other amenities. These designs will
optimize the street for all modes of travel, with
consideration given to priority modes identified for
each network street.

Cross sections and conceptual designs will
be illustrated in a manner to help the public
understand the vision and engage with the
planning process. Concepts will be presented in
the second round of Community Engagement to
gauge community comfort with and enthusiasm for
different facility types and cross sections.

Task 6.2 Mapping and Exhibits
Fehr & Peers will create maps depicting the
planned pedestrian and bicycle network by
existing roadway classification and priority mode
for each corridor, recommended facility types,
and proposed implementation phase. We will
also provide maps showing how the existing and
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 15

proposed networks connect to key destinations
and publicly owned lands such as parks, schools,
and neighborhood services. Draft network maps
will be prepared and revised based on the second
round of community engagement and one round
of comments from the City and BPAC.

TASK 6 DELIVERABLES
Conceptual design exhibits and typical cross
sections
Draft and Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan maps
Task 7 -
Community and
Stakeholder
Engagement
At Fehr & Peers, we center community feedback as
one of the most important components in creating
and improving healthy, sustainable communities.

We will provide equitable public outreach,
generating insightful feedback and meaningful
recommendations, to provide the most
comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan for the City of Beaumont. This is an exciting
opportunity to partner with the City in creating a
safe and accessible active transportation system
that embraces classic and new forms of mobility,
as it connects users across Beaumont's "rustic,
rural beauty, and charm."
Our public outreach strategy will employ diverse
types of engagement initiatives aimed at raising
project awareness and capturing feedback across
a wide range of stakeholders. This approach
enables the City to provide a Final Plan that
reflects community -wide values and aspirations.

Task 7.1 Community
Engagement Strategy
The goal of this engagement strategy is to
connect with as comprehensive a cross section of
community members as possible, over a 15 -month
timeframe. We aim to reach residents and small
business owners, families and bike enthusiasts,
and those who walk, run, or roll for transportation
or enjoyment. We will engage with community
members of varying ages (young and old alike)
and mobility levels. With growth in the housing and
warehouse sectors of the City, we will also aim to
reach incoming residents, workforce populations,
warehouse owners, and property developers.

City and elected officials will continue to play a
role in providing critical and strategic feedback
that shapes a safe, successful, and sustainable
Plan. Fehr & Peers will work closely with the City
of Beaumont to tailor this list of stakeholders to
ensure we connect with the right organizations.

Task 7.2 Public Outreach Activities
Creating and hosting compelling, interactive, and
convenient public outreach activities will help
attract feedback through both in -person and
online mediums. It is important to create hands-on
initiatives and events to ensure public awareness
and education about the Plan, while simultaneously
fostering community ownership and buy -in. We will
have activities that are meaningful and convenient
for the community, to ensure as much participation
as possible.

We will work with the City to create two public
outreach surveys that collect measurable data,
informing a numbers -based Plan. These surveys
will be the backbone of our public outreach
strategy and will be launched first at the start
of outreach, and then toward the later months
of outreach, allowing them to run alongside
stakeholder meetings and public outreach events,
as we move across the 15 -month timeline. These
surveys will be deployed online so that they are
always accessible and convenient for participants,
while being easily administered at in -person
meetings or events.

The first survey will focus on how community
members use the current bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure, giving them an opportunity to talk
about barriers to using the existing system, while
identifying specific areas of concern through an
interactive map. The second survey will build
off the findings from the first survey and will be
deployed during the second half of the timeline.

As the public outreach process gains momentum,
Fehr & Peers staff will expand outreach efforts
by hosting 6 pop-up events across the City at
established community gatherings like Beaumont
16 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Nights or the annual Lavendar Festival. At these
pop-up events attendees can learn about City's
goals and vision for the project, supported by
posters that highlight current and future active
transportation routes and paths. Posters will also
provide visual examples of bike and pedestrian
facilities to help attendees create a vision for what
they would like to see implemented in the City.

Attendees will then be able to vote on each facility
type by placing a green dot on the poster. This will
create a visual representation of the infrastructure
community members agree on. Finally, everyone
will be encouraged to take the online survey at the
pop-up event, or will be given a reminder card to
fill out the survey at a more convenient time. These
pop -ups create an opportunity to engage with
a wide and diverse range of stakeholders during
events around the city.

Digital and print communication materials will
support all outreach initiatives across the course
of the engagement process. Themes focused on
active transportation and lifestyles, bicycle and
pedestrian safety, and community empowerment
and awareness will be employed to underscore
the City's commitment to "abundant recreational
opportunities and rich community life."
We will create materials that bring awareness to
the project, educate people on the Master Plan,
direct people to the online survey, and invite
the community to the interactive engagement
workshop. Social media campaigns that utilize the
City's accounts across Instagram, Facebook, and
Linkedln will complement this approach.

Printed materials such as posters and postcards
will be created to place in businesses and anchor
institutions around the City. Digital announcements
will be posted in local online information platforms
like Nextdoor. By creating a comprehensive
communication strategy, we ensure that the
public outreach process stays top of mind with the
community as a whole.

Task 7.3 Stakeholder Coordination
Coordinating with key stakeholders, such as
WRCOG, school districts, transit providers, and
council members will help gather feedback
and recommendations rooted in the strategic
and functional reality of Beaumont. We will
work directly with the City to curate this list of
stakeholders, then engage them through in -
person and virtual listening sessions, and phone
calls where necessary. Throughout this process
we will document all responses, generating a
holistic foundation of feedback from a variety of
contributors.

Task 7.4 Documentation
of Public Input
Throughout the public outreach process, we will
collect quantitative and qualitative data that will
inform the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan,
through both analysis of numerical measurements
and context -rich feedback. We will prepare a
report that describes the entire public outreach
process, summarizes all feedback, and identifies
themes, concerns, and recommendations
that emerge from analyzing community and
stakeholder feedback. This information will be
presented in a clear, straightforward way to help
inform and construct the City's updated Plan. We
will draft an initial report on engagement efforts
and results for the City for review. The finalized
engagement report will be included in the Final
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as an appendix.

TASK 7 DELIVERABLES
Community Engagement Plan
Pop-up Event Materials
Online surveys (2)
Summary of public and stakeholder input and
responses
Documentation suitable for inclusion in the Draft
and Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Task 8 - Final
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Master Plan
Task 8.1 Draft Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan
Fehr & Peers will compile summaries, technical
memos and exhibits from previous tasks into a
Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. This
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 17

Draft will include maps, tables, images, and text
based on these prior deliverables, using graphic
elements and layout for reading comprehension
both online and in print. The Plan itself will be
focused on key needs, messages, and deliverables
for use by City staff, elected officials, and the
public. Supporting data will be provided in
appendices.

The Draft Plan will be provided to the project team
and the BPAC for one round of comments.

Task 8.2 Implementation Strategy
Fehr & Peers will create an implementation
strategy to drive construction of walking and
biking projects; rollout of non -infrastructure
programs; and ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and
adjustment of these programs and improvements.

This program will include the following:

Identification of prioritized (high/medium/low
priority) projects stratified by short-, medium -
and long-term implementation actions
Planning -level cost estimates and potential
funding sources and strategies to support grant
applications
Identification of next steps and potential project
partners to advance projects to design and
implementation phases.

Task 8.3 Final Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan
Comments received from the BPAC and City staff
will be reviewed and incorporated in the Final Plan
as appropriate. Comments and resolutions will be
documented in tabular form and provided with the
Final Plan.

Task 8.4 City Council
Presentation and Approval
An executive summary and presentation of
the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will be
prepared and presented to the Beaumont City
Council by the Fehr & Peers team. All deliverables
and supporting materials will be compiled and
provided in digital format to the City.

TASK 8 DELIVERABLES
Draft Bicycle Master Plan
Final Bicycle Master Plan
Executive summary document
City Council presentation
Digital deliverables and supporting files
Task 9 - Project
Closeout and Grant
Documentation
Task 9.1 Final Review and Approvals
Final City Council comments will be addressed by
Fehr & Peers staff, and we will work with City staff
to obtain approval of the Final Plan.

Task 9.2 Grant
Documentation Support
The Fehr & Peers team will provide documentation
as required for grant reimbursement as
documented in the SB 821 grant guidelines and
agreement.

Task 9.3 Project Closeout
Fehr & Peers will confirm the completion of all
tasks in the project scope, provide final copies of
all project deliverables, and attend a close-out
meeting with City staff if requested.

TASK 9 DELIVERABLES
Final approved Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan and supporting documentation
Project closeout summary
Grant documentation support materials, as
requested
Optional Tasks
Fehr & Peers would like to suggest several optional
tasks that we believe will increase community
acceptance of the Plan, and strengthen the benefit
of recommended safety countermeasures.
18 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Optional Task 1: - Community
Walk Audits
Walk audits are versatile tools for pedestrian
planning efforts. They can increase public
engagement with the planning process, build
awareness of pedestrian design, and identify safety
issues specific to walking. Walk audits are both
educational for the participating members, as
well as an excellent method to gather community
input on specific, high -profile corridors. They can
be particularly effective for generating support
when conducted with elected officials or high-level
City decision -makers. Fehr & Peers recommends
conducting community or decision -maker walk
audits for the top two locations identified in Task

5. For this task, Fehr & Peers staff would lead the
audits and provide documentation of the process
and outcomes. The information collected would be
added to the Community Engagement data, and
used to determine effective, community -approved
countermeasures.

Optional Task 2 — Common
Crash Profiles Involving
Bicyclists or Pedestrians
For this task, Fehr & Peers would perform
a systemic analysis of different factors that
contribute to crashes, with the goal of identifying
common crash profiles involving bicyclists or
pedestrians in the City of Beaumont. Used with
GIS data, crash profiles can be used to determine
where bicycle or pedestrian crashes may be
expected to occur in the future, even if those
locations have not yet experienced collisions These
profiles would then be used to determine what
countermeasures will be most effective in reducing
injury crashes, and where on the identified network
they could be used to greatest effect.
000
o
•
Optional Task 3 — Detailed Concept
Designs and Cost Estimates
For this task, Fehr & Peers would prepare detailed
concept designs and cost estimates for up
to three of the top -ranked projects identified
through the network development and corridor
prioritization efforts. Projects that have more in-
depth design and cost estimating are more likely
to be successful when applying for implementation
funding.

Optional Task 4 — Grant Support
Fehr & Peers' staff are experienced grant writers,
helping clients secure over $150 million in safety
planning and implementation funding in the
past 10 years, including $116 million in SS4A
implementation funding. Fehr & Peers also has
helped secure over $32 million in HSIP funding,
over $570 million in federal funding, and a total
of over $969 million for clients throughout the
country.

For this task, Fehr & Peers would help Beaumont
craft compelling grant narratives that communicate
the context and a clear purpose and need to the
reviewers. Project descriptions will highlight the
unique aspects of the project while staying within
the funding agency's guidance. We will produce
visual aids supported by the data and analysis
completed through this planning effort. This task
was estimated at approximately 54 hours. The
number of projects/grants that can be addressed
will be dependent on complexity of the project and
type of funding being applied for.

Optional Task 5 — Addendum
to the General Plan
This Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan represents
a continuation of work begun during the
development of the Mobility Element of the Elevate
Beaumont 2040 General Plan Update. As such, we
have an opportunity to strengthen the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan by amending the General
Plan to integrate the final bicycle and pedestrian
network resulting from this project into the goals,
priorities and policies of the General Plan. Robust
integration with the General Plan can help both
garner public support for projects and obtain grant
support for implementation.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 19

F. Approach
Fehr & Peers considers each potential assignment
carefully, and only pursues projects to which we
can commit the appropriate time, effort, and
resources to provide excellent services. We are
able to offer a dedicated team for this project and
can supplement it as needed from our large pool
of resources. Our approach to each project we
commit to includes the following:

Ongoing Communication
with City Staff
Fehr & Peers understands that collaboration and
open communication lead to successful, high -
quality, on -time and on -budget projects. We
prioritize setting clear expectations and creating
open channels of communication from the start.

We remain in continual communication with our
clients throughout each project and have a proven
record of success working as a team with the City
of Beaumont.

Defined Expectations
Fehr & Peers will work with City staff to identify
expectations at project onset. By communicating
clearly from the beginning, we can create a
schedule and budget that will work for Beaumont.

Overcoming Challenges
We are aware that however well expectations are
defined at the outset of a project, circumstances
may change. Challenges can arise due to a range
of issues including tight schedules, limited budget
resources, neighborhood controversy/opposition,
and interactions with adjacent agencies. Fehr &
Peers has successfully dealt with each of these
issues on prior projects. We can respond to tight
schedules by reassigning staff. We can tailor our
scope of work to meet budget expectations. We
can adjust our engagement approach to address
neighborhood concerns.
20 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

We strive to remain nimble, so that we are able
to adjust our study approach, call upon additional
resources when necessary, and address other
potential issues as they arise.

Delivering On Schedule
Before a project begins, we analyze and forecast
the time and resources needed to complete project
deliverables by their scheduled due date. Workload
is managed on a weekly basis to ensure sufficient
progress is made based on schedule commitments.

Project managers meet weekly to plan staff loading
and resolve any potential conflicts with project
commitments.

Cost Control/
Managing Budget
Fehr & Peers relies on a state-of-the-art project
management system, the Deltek VantagePoint
platform, which provides on-line, real-time cost
and budget status. This information is used to
generate weekly and monthly progress reports.

These monthly reports are provided with each
invoice and include comparisons of project budget
spent versus workload complete.

Communicating with Other
Stakeholders and the Public
With frequent multi -agency coordination
experience from numerous projects, and our
experience in multiple jurisdictions, we understand
the demands and sometimes competing interests
of stakeholders on planning and engineering
projects. Our initial proposed designs and planning
solutions take into account agency requirements,
national best practices, and the local context,
thereby minimizing controversy when initially
reviewed by stakeholders and affected community
members during the planning phase. We
understand, however, that public and stakeholder
concerns can still arise. These can be alleviated
through in-depth knowledge of the area, photos
documenting conditions, micro -simulation, clear
communication, and listening with empathy to truly
understand the needs and concerns of affected
community members and stakeholders.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 21

Project Schedule 2026
Project Start Date: June 2026
Jun
L
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Tasks
__
Task 1 - Project Management

1.1 Project Initiation

1.2 Project Schedule and Management

1.3 Meetings and Coordination

1.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

1.5 Documentation and Grant Compliance
Task 2 - Existing Conditions Analysis

2.1 Review of Existing Plans and Data

2.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory

2.3 Field Review and Reconnaissance

2.4 Safety and Traffic Context Review

2.5 Connectivity and Accessibility Analysis
Task 3 - Field Review and Constraints Analysis

3.1 Right -of -Way Review and Feasibility Analysis

3.2 Corridor and Intersection Assessment

3.3 Physical and Operational Constraints

3.4 Planning -Level ADA and Accessibility Considerations Task 4 - Policy, Plan, and Standards Review

4.1 Review of City Plans and Policies

4.2 Review of Regional and State Guidance

4.3 Review of Design Standards and Guidelines

4.4 Policy Consistency Assessment
Task 5 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Development

5.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Framework

5.2 Connectivity and Access

5.3 Safety -Driven Network Development

5.4 Corridor Prioritization and Phasing

5.5 Planning -Level Cost Considerations
Task 6 - Conceptual Design and Plan Development

6.1 Conceptual Design Development

6.2 Mapping and Exhibits
Task 7 - Community and Stakeholder Engagement

7.1 Community Engagement Strategy

7.2 Public Outreach Activities

7.3 Stakeholder Coordination

7.4 Documentation of Public Input
Task 8 - Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.1 Draft Bicycle Master Plan

8.2 Implementation Strategy

8.3 Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

8.4 City Council Presentation and Approval
Task 9 - Project Closeout and Grant Documentation

9.1 Final Review and Approvals

9.2 Grant Documentation Support

9.3 Project Closeout
C
S
22 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

2027
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct
Notes and Major Deliverables
B
B = BPAC Meeting
2 = All Task 2 Deliverables
3 = All Task 3 Deliverables
4 = All Task 4 Deliverables
5 5 = All Task 5 Deliverables
D
6 D = Draft Master Plan Maps, 6 = All Task 6 Deliverables C = Community Engagement Plan
S
S = Summaries of Public Input and Responses
D
D = Documentation for Inclusion in the Master Plan
D
D = Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
F
F = Final Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
8 D = All Remaining Task 8 Deliverables
9 9 = All Task 9 Deliverables
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 23

G. Additional Information
Requested Contract Changes
If awarded this contract, Fehr & Peers hopes to be able to negotiate a contract with the City that has similar terms to what was agreed upon in our On -Call Agreement between the City and Fehr & Peers, dated February 7, 2023, including a comparable indemnification obligation. We believe this approach serves the best interests of both parties, as the previously established terms ensure that our insurance will protect the City in the event of a claim.
24 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

H. References

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ATP
FEBRUARY 2021 - OCTOBER 2024
Fehr & Peers led the development of County of
Santa Barbara's first Active Transportation Plan,
engaging communities across unincorporated
areas to develop a prioritized set of policies
and more than 35 pedestrian and bicycle
improvements that support safer, more sustainable
everyday travel. Services included data analysis,
safety analysis, community engagement,
conceptual design, cost estimating and grant
support.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Mark Friedlander
Active Transportation Manager
County of Santa Barbara Public Works,
Transportation Division
(805) 568-3576
[email protected]

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
LRSP
JANUARY 2022 - NOVEMBER 2022
Fehr & Peers developed a Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) focused on County maintained roadways
within unincorporated San Bernardino County.

We used a dual -pronged approach: 1) identifying
priority systemic safety improvement projects
based on high -risk roadway features that are
correlated with fatal and severe collision types, and
2) reviewing collision trends to develop behavioral
countermeasures. The plan also included
stakeholder engagement, the development of six
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant
applications for the County under a constrained
timeline, and helped the County secure millions of
dollars in funding for project implementation.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Noel Castillo, P.E.

Deputy Director - Transportation
Department of Public Works
[email protected]
Phone: 909-387-7916
825 E. Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 25

•

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
•
N

WRCOG ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PLAN
NOVEMBER 2016 - JULY 2018
Fehr & Peers led the team preparing the Western
Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Active
Transportation Plan (ATP). This included obtaining
and reviewing relevant planning documents;
establishing a working group to engage a broad
section of stakeholders; and developing a
survey instrument and survey methodology to
determine the sub region's general needs, values
and concerns surrounding walking, bicycling,
and transit. The existing conditions analysis also
included collision analysis; economic indicators;
and data on key health topics including obesity
rates, physical activity rates, chronic diseases
affected by air quality and physical activity
(including asthma, coronary diseases, and cancer),
and mortality rates. The final ATP included
priority projects as well as goals, objectives, and
performance metrics for the implementation of the
plan.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Christopher Tzeng
Program Manager
Western Riverside Council of Governments
[email protected]
951.405.6711
ct. Lr. eerwhac Cooney AMe hmP aum Mama, Ormi
• t.e •nt S*kamt to knee. lSRl ! Sake, .o.: .+i i.JO rake O.+Wk t-s.em y Bike Fariliutk Safe Bike Caws: Data(lrannekouse Bicycle Haw* 1,304 45
Gke Casey.
roe and Day
•µ8.,t. 151 AM
130% 1t 54 AN
Toro And Grr wy
Collision severity
kt`�M 111111111111111111111
Caryyra
dPan
• 306-SS9AY MAO -859M
O ka. 249
•3W SSe"
6 106 kW
•No. •.
169
o
0 0 p p
11;
Akohaltrwelml
°•
•
®o
me
0°m ••
00 ° o •"•
° ° O e
o ° � ° 0
D 0 �
9 o ,

SBCTA ATP PROJECT

PRIORITIZATION AND GRANT

SUPPORT
APRIL 2023 - JUNE 2024
Fehr & Peers developed a methodology to evaluate
and prioritize proposed bicycle, pedestrian
and safe routes to school projects across San
Bernardino County. This included stakeholder
outreach and the development of a web -based
tool to collect stakeholder and agency input and
to present the final rankings. Fehr & Peers also
supported the development of four ATP grant
applications.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Ginger Koblasz
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA)
(909) 884-8276
[email protected]
1170 W 3rd Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410 US
26 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ATP/SAFE ROUTES TO

SCHOOL PLAN
JULY 2022 - JULY 2023
Fehr & Peers developed an APA-award winning
school -focused active transportation plan for
Rancho Cucamonga. Services included data
analysis, safety analysis, community engagement,
conceptual design, cost estimating and grant
support.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Justine Garcia
City of Rancho Cucamonga
(909) 774-2046

CORONA COMPLETE

STREETS SAFETY

ASSESSMENT
JUNE 2021 — ONGOING
Fehr & Peers provides peer review of
transportation impact studies for the City
to ensure consistency with adopted SB 743
thresholds and traffic impact study guidelines,
documenting findings through technical
memoranda.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Rosie Ureno
City Traffic Engineer
(951) 817-5708
[email protected]
400 South Vicentia Avenue
Corona, CA 92882

WESTMINSTER GARDEN

GROVE BOULEVARD

CYCLE TRACK & LRSP
AUGUST 2016 - JANUARY 2018
& JANUARY 2021 - ONGOING
Fehr & Peers previously supported the City of
Westminster by evaluating a potential cycle
track along Garden Grove Boulevard. We are
currently developing the City's Local Road
Safety Plan, using a data -driven approach to
identify priority projects and strategies that
improve safety for all roadway users.

REFERENCE CONTACT
Adolfo Ozaeta
Assistant City Manager
City of Westminster
8200 Westminster Blvd
Westminster CA 92683
(714) 548-3462
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 27

u)
G
N
ce
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 29

Fehr& Peers
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 1999
Registrations
Licensed Traffic Engineer
(TR2402)
Years of Experience
Total: 26 years
With Fehr & Peers: 26 years
Affiliations
Association of Environmental
Professional (AEP)
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
American Planning Association
(APA)
Urban Land Institute (ULI)
Recognitions
WTS Honorable Ray LaHood
Award Winner (Man of the
Year) — IE Chapter, 2023
Presentations
VMT-Related:
• 2023 UCLA Land Use Law
and Policy
• 2022 National APA
• 2022 Western ITE
• 2022 CEAC Public Works
Officers Institute
• 2022 SBCOG City/County
• 2019 California APA
• 2019 CSU Facilities
Jason D. Pack, PE
Principal I Principal -in -Charge
About
Jason is a Principal at Fehr & Peers in Southern California, where he blends deep technical expertise with forward -thinking leadership. In addition to managing a wide range of transportation projects, Jason spearheads the firm's research and development initiatives in emergency evacuation assessment —helping communities plan for the unexpected.

With a strong foundation in travel demand forecasting, traffic operations (including micro -simulation), VMT and big data analysis, and transit ridership forecasting, Jason excels at translating complex data into actionable insights. He is a trusted advisor to clients navigating the evolving landscape of NEPA and CEQA transportation impact studies.

Jason's recent work includes leading mobility analyses for major infrastructure projects, guiding SB 743 implementation strategies including helping agencies establish VMT banks and exchanges, and supporting compliance with California's latest evacuation planning mandates (SB 99 and AB 747). Whether shaping future - focused transportation policies or solving today's toughest mobility challenges, Jason is driven by a mission to make smarter, safer, and more sustainable communities a reality.

Relevant Project Experience
City of Beaumont Experience
Jason has completed a wide variety of over 20 projects for the City of Beaumont in California, including:
• Beaumont General Plan Circulation Element
• Beaumont Peer Review Services
• Pennsylvania Avenue Grade SEP
• Beaumont South of SR 60 Roadway Nexus Study
• I-10 and Oak Valley Parkway PAED
• Beaumont Truck Route Study
• Beaumont 6th Street Revitalization Test
• Beaumont Gorgonio Professional Center Peer Review
• Beaumont Highland Springs at 6th Street Signal Timing • Beaumont Marketplace at Oak Valley Peer Review
• Beaumont Noble Creek Vista Peer Review
• Beaumont Truck Route & Parking Ordinance
• Beaumont Oak Valley Village TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont Mustang Trip Gen Peer Review
• Beaumont Heights Business Peer Review
• Beaumont San Jacinto Peer Review
• Beaumont Lilac Center TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont 79 North Center TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont Pointe TIA Peer Review
• Beaumont Orchard Logistics Peer Review
• Beaumont Legacy Peer Review
30 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr& Peers
Presentations (cont.)
Future of Transportation:
• 2018 SBCTA City/County
• 2017 WRCOG Planning
Parking:
• 2018 OC Planning Directors
Emergency Evacuation
• 2022 National APA
• 2022 California APA
Multimodal LOS
• ULI SCIC
• I-10 Pennsylvania Avenue Support
Specific Plans/Master Plans/Corridor Plans
Jason has completed assessments for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. Key projects are identified below:
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan, Anaheim, CA
• MAG High Capacity Transit Corridors Sustainability Study, Phoenix, CA • RTC of Southern Nevada High Capacity Transit Study, Las Vegas, CA • Long Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan, Long Beach, CA • Cal Poly Pomona Master Plan
• Holt Boulevard Corridor Plan, Ontario, CA
• High Speed Rail Access Study, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
• HART District Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
• Wine Country Community Plan, Riverside County, CA
• CollegeTown Specific Plan, Fullerton, CA
• Mall Specific Plan, Westminster CA
• The Resort/Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Rancho Cucamonga, CA • Bus Rapid Transit TOD Overlay Study, San Bernardino, CA Design Studies
Jason has taught complete streets design for UC Berkeley Technology Transfer, Caltrans, and LA Metro; but has also been involved in a variety of design -related studies. These design focused efforts are described below:
• Foothill Boulevard — Rancho Cucamonga
• Haven Avenue — Rancho Cucamonga
• LRSP Corridor Safety Enhancements
• Montclair
• Westminster
• Lake Elsinore
• Downtown Roseville
• Downtown Victorville
• Adalanto Specific Plan
• The Resort Specific Plan
• Cal Poly Pomona Transit Lane
• Cal Poly Pomona Bikeway Project
• Fullerton Bikeway Connection Study
• San Jose Bicycle Freeway Corridor Study
• Holt Boulevard BRT Corridor Concept Design
• Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan Complete Street Concepts • Carlsbad Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategies (CATS) Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 31

Fehr&Peers
Education
Master of Public Health —
Policy and Management,
University of Arizona,
Tucson AZ (2022)
Master of Science —
Urban Planning,
University of Arizona,
Tucson AZ (2007)
Graduate Certificate —
Sustainable Tourism,
Arizona State University,
Tempe AZ (2016)
Bachelor of Science —
Psychology,
Northern Arizona University,
Flagstaff AZ, (1999)
Registrations
American Institute of Certified
Planners (#34532)
Road Safety Professional
Level 1 (#1132)
Level 2 - Behavioral (#29)
Years of Experience
Total: 22 years
With Fehr & Peers: 1 year
Affiliations
American Planning Association
(APA)
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Presentations
Vulnerable Road User Planning
and Design Tools — ASCE
National Conference (2023)
Lost in Translation: Bridging the
Communication Gap Between
Transportation and Public
Health — AZ APA (2023)
Donna C. Lewandowski, AICP, RSP2B
Associate Transportation Planner I Project Manager
About
Donna has over two decades of experience working at the intersection of transportation and public health. She is a certified Level 2 Road Safety Professional in the behavioral discipline, and brings perspectives from public health, sustainability and human behavior to her transportation planning projects. Donna has significant program and project management experience and has secured over two dozen federal grant awards in both the transportation and public health fields.

She has served on NCHRP Research Project Panels and provided technical assistance on National Institute of Health grant panels.

Donna has worked for both state and county governments, giving her a thorough knowledge of agency processes and requirements. She excels in public presentations, engaging with diverse stakeholders, decision -makers and the media.

Relevant Project Experience
Complete Streets Safety Assessment (Riverside, CA)
Project Manager. Donna led interviews with local staff to understand their safety concerns for the corridors, reviewed historic collision data to understand key safety issues, and completed field visit safety and walking audits. The final summary report included project recommendations with conceptual designs of proposed improvements in a 10 -mile long corridor in Riverside.

Complete Streets Safety Assessment (Corona, CA)
Project Manager. Donna led interviews with local staff to understand their safety concerns for the corridors, reviewed historic collision data to understand key safety issues, and completed field visit safety and walking audits. The final summary report included project recommendations with conceptual designs of proposed improvements in two key corridors and a key intersection in Corona.

Safe Routes to School Study (La Habra, CA)
Project Manager. Donna is leading the development of a Safe Routes to School Study for 15 schools across urban and suburban areas. For each school, the team will conduct walk audits and detailed collision analyses using state and local data.

The final report will identify infrastructure improvements that enhance safety and position the City for future grant funding opportunities.

Complete Streets Safety Assessment (Tustin, CA)
Project Manager. Donna led interviews with local staff to understand their safety concerns for the corridors, reviewed historic collision data to understand key safety issues, and completed field visit safety and walking audits. The final summary report included project recommendations with conceptual designs of proposed improvements in two key corridors in Tustin.

Providence Mission Hospital Safety Mobility Study (Mission Viejo, CA) Project Manager. Donna led the development of a safety and mobility study for the hospital campus. Steps included a close analysis of crash reports over a two-year period; two campus field visits to assess the circulation, signage, and roadway 32 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr&Peers
Presentations (cont.)
Bottom -up and Top -down:

Addressing walking and
bicycling in rural areas through
a health lens - APBP (2022)
markings; development of recommendations to improve pedestrian and vehicle safety; and creation of a slide deck to communicate the study steps and results.

SS4A Vision Zero and Safety Action Plan (Glendale, AZ)
Project Manager. Donna is leading the crash analysis and creation of a high -injury network, and leading several components of the final product: development of a Vision Zero Plan and a Neighborhood Safety Plan, and a Speed Study. Additionally, she assisted in the development and execution of a visioning workshop.

Local Road Safety Plan, Scottsdale Road (Scottsdale, AZ)* Behavioral Safety Specialist. Donna led a Road Safety Assessment for a 6 -lane mixed -use arterial roadway. The analysis included a 5 -year crash analysis, field observations, a multi -jurisdictional Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) analysis to determine the cumulative effect of multiple TIAs in the corridor, and interviews with staff from transportation, police, and fire to better understand the safety concerns.

In addition to infrastructure and programmatic recommendations, the final report included policy and implementation actions to incorporate safety analysis into TIA requirements.

Road Safety Assessment, SR89A from Robert Road to the Base of Mingus Mountain (Prescott Valley, AZ)*
Behavioral Safety Specialist. Donna led a Road Safety Assessment for an 8 -mile segment of a two-lane rural highway. The analysis included a 5 -year crash analysis, field observations, and interviews with staff from transportation, police, and fire to better understand the safety concerns in the corridor. Analysis was completed separately for the corridor and one major intersection. The final report included infrastructure and programmatic recommendations, to increase safety throughout the corridor.

Safe Routes to School Plan (Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, AZ)* Lead Planner. Donna led the planning process, reviewing the vehicular pick-up and drop-off circulation plan, and assessing bicycle and pedestrian connectivity with the surrounding neighborhoods. The plan recommended physical improvements around the school and programmatic recommendations for all 6 SRTS E's, a walking and biking route map, and a funding and implementation plan.

Statewide Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment (Colorado Department of Transportation)*
Lead Planner. Donna was responsible for performing an equity analysis to identify high -risk areas and populations; interpreting the results of qualitative and quantitative analyses; identifying and analyzing related plans within Colorado and its policy peer states; and conducting consultations with representatives of identified high -risk populations. The final VRU report was completed using a Safe System Approach.

SS4A Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (Waterloo, IA)*
Project Manager. Donna led the development of an SS4A-compliant Safety Action Plan for the downtown area, which included a vulnerable immigrant population. The data -driven analysis resulted in recommendations for both location -specific and systemic countermeasures to increase the safety of all roadway users. *Work performed before joining Fehr & Peers
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 33

Fehr& Peers
Education
Master of Urban Planning,
University of California, Los
Angeles, 2003
Bachelor of Arts, International
Relations Florida State
University, 1998
Years of Experience
Total: 23 years
With Fehr & Peers: 13 years
Presentations
Bring Your Curb Enthusiasm!
Introducing ITE's new
Curbside Management
Practitioner's Guide —
Association of Pedestrian and
Bicycle Professionals
Conference (2019)
Bikeway Planning Studio - USC,
Sol Price School of Public
Policy (2015)
Bikeway Planning and Design —
UCLA Department of Urban
Planning, Transportation
Planning Lecture Series (2010,
2012)
Bikeway Planning and Design —
Cal Poly Pomona, Department
of Landscape Architecture
Lecture Series (2010)
Matt Benjamin
Principal I Technical Support
About
Over the past 20+ years, Matt has approached transportation planning from a variety of perspectives, both as a user of all modes, and through his work in the public, non-profit, and private sectors. He has a long track record of leading complex multimodal transportation and safety projects that have been implemented throughout Southern California including complete streets projects, safety improvements, bike share systems, mobility hubs and next generation bus stops. Matt regularly coordinates teams of planners, data scientists, and engineers to develop appropriate complete streets and traffic safety countermeasures.

Relevant Project Experience
Rancho Cucamonga Active Transportation Plan (ATP) (Rancho Cucamonga, CA) Project Manager. Fehr & Peers is developing a school -focused ATP for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Building on the City's award -winning General Plan, also supported by Fehr & Peers, the new plan strengthens the City's layered mobility network with a comprehensive approach to safe, connected travel options. As part of this work, Fehr & Peers is developing design details for each project, identifying new improvements to complete the network, with a strong focus on school access.

The team provides regular updates to all local school districts and facilitates discussions with youth leaders through the City's Annual Teen Summit. The final plan delivers a detailed, implementable list of projects designed to improve mobility and safety for students and the broader community.

Citywide Pedestrian Safety Study (Moreno Valley, CA)
Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers partnered with the City of Moreno Valley to complete a citywide systemic pedestrian safety analysis focused on improving safety at uncontrolled crosswalks and enhancing access to bus stops. The team developed a prioritized list of safety projects to position the City for future grant funding and created an action plan with performance metrics, benchmarks, and implementation strategies. To capture near misses and unreported incidents, Fehr & Peers launched a bilingual webmap survey and convened a multidisciplinary stakeholder group, including senior advocates, multicultural organizations, and public health representatives —to guide plan development and ensure community perspectives were reflected throughout.

Santa Ana Safe Routes to School (Santa Ana, CA)
Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers was part of a team that developed Safe Routes to School plans for every school in the City of Santa Ana. Fehr & Peers staff led walk audits of elementary, middle and high schools in Santa Ana including collecting roll call surveys of student mode share from teachers, interviewing school principals and key staff familiar with pick-up and drop-off activities, and facilitating discussions with parents in English and Spanish. Fehr & Peers also prepared detailed school improvement maps for 29 schools that will be used for securing grant funding for implementation.

The Anaheim Resort Mobility Study (Anaheim, CA)
Project Manager. Matt managed the Anaheim Resort Area Mobility Plan which created a long-term vision for mobility in the Anaheim Resort Area which attracts 34 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr & Peers
millions of visitors annually from around the world. The study identifies transformative mobility and safety improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit users in and around the Anaheim Resort Area that will be carried forward in conjunction with other major real estate development and infrastructure projects in this dynamic regional activity center.

City of Westminster Safe Routes to School (Westminster, CA) Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers is partnered with Alta Planning and Design to develop Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plans for 21 schools in the City of Westminster, California. Fehr & Peers staff led the collection of existing conditions, including collision history, conformance with other plans, and school -area counts.

Fehr & Peers completed a detailed review of school -related collisions and prepared an analysis of gaps within a quarter mile walkshed of each school. Finally, Fehr and Peers will use knowledge of the local area and understanding of client's needs to provide a feasibility review of proposed projects.

City of Oxnard Safe Routes to School (SRTS), Phases I & II (Oxnard, CA) Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers is completing a multiyear SRTS program for the City of Oxnard, covering 52 schools across urban, suburban, and agricultural areas.

For each school, the team conducts walk audits and detailed collision analyses using state and local data. The findings identify infrastructure improvements that enhance safety and position the City for future grant funding opportunities. 2022 Vision Zero Safety Analysis (Los Angeles, CA)
Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers supported LADOT in updating its Vision Zero technical analysis, evaluating implemented countermeasures, refining the High - Injury Network, and prioritizing future safety investments. The effort incorporated systemic safety analysis, big data, and near -miss analytics to assess outcomes and focus strategies proven to improve roadway safety, helping Los Angeles track progress and advance its Vision Zero program.

LABOE Sidewalk & Transit Amenities Program (STAP) (Los Angeles, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Fehr & Peers is providing planning, engineering logistical support to StreetsLA for the implementation of the City's Sidewalk and Transit Amenities (STAP) program. We are working as part of a large multidisciplinary team as a subconsultant, and are responsible for the planning, design, manufacture, and installation of over 3,000 new bus shelters in advance of the 2028 Olympic Games.

Fehr & Peers is specifically supporting the development of data management protocols and a plan for strategically clustering and sequencing the installation of bus shelters to maximize public benefit and the sustainability of the program. Fehr & Peers is also assisting with desktop and field -based data collection, and the preparation of site plans and electrical plans.

Orange County Mobility Hub Strategy (Orange County, CA) Project Manager. Fehr & Peers led technical tasks for OCTA's regional mobility hub strategy, defining hub typologies to guide planning and developing a suitability web map based on five demand profiles representing commuters, students, tourists, and other users. The team also created and applied a methodology to estimate potential mode shift using regional travel demand model outputs and time and cost analysis, helping identify high -potential locations and inform implementation strategies across Orange County.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 35

Fehr&Peers
Education
Master of City and Regional
Planning, University of Texas at
Arlington, 1999
Bachelor of Arts, Political
Science, University of Texas at
Arlington, 1997
Years of Experience
Total: 26 years
With Fehr & Peers: 8 years
Registrations
AICP (26392)
Affiliations
Transportation Research Board
(TRB) Intermodal Freight
Committee (AT045)
American Planning Association
(APA)
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Women's Transportation
Seminar (WTS)
Jolene Hayes, AICP
Principal I Technical Support
About
Jolene, located in our Orange County office of Fehr & Peers, has 27 years of experience in local, regional and statewide transportation, land use and goods movement planning and research, environmental analysis, and implementation.

With a focus on collaboration and stakeholder input, Jolene focuses on the development of sustainable transportation solutions. Her work frequently requires a deep level of understanding community concerns, industry needs, and State economic and environmental sustainability goals to develop cross -cutting solutions that reduce greenhouse gases while fostering economic vitality. Throughout her career, Jolene has planned, prioritized and implemented a variety of transportation projects ranging from traffic calming and bikeway improvements to major freight infrastructure projects. She is well -versed in local, regional and national issues and understands the importance of balancing the movement of goods and people on railways, roadways and waterways from a local, port, regional, state and national perspective.

Relevant Project Experience
Town of Apple Valley Circulation Plan Update (Apple Valley, CA) Associate -in -Charge. Jolene led the Town's update of its circulation element. The update was prompted by the removal of the High Desert Corridor through the Town, and it also incorporated new policies to address state legislative requirements.

Beaumont Truck Routing Study (Beaumont, CA)
Project Manager. Jolene led a detailed analysis to assist the City with developing a truck route network to serve a major industrial warehousing hub that is quickly growing. The analysis consisted of a land use study of truck generating uses and sensitive receptors, existing truck volumes on local roadways, truck origins/destinations, existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and detailed AutoTurn analysis of the truck route network to identify potential improvements needed to accommodate trucks.

City of Hesperia General Plan Mobility Element Update (Hesperia, CA) Project Manager. Jolene led the update to the Circulation Element prompted by an update to the City's Housing Element. This update incorporates policies that conform with state legislation, such as complete streets and provisions for truck routes, and identifies future transportation system improvements, such as changes to roadway classifications and access to the future Brightline Station.

City of Ontario General Plan Update and Amendment (Ontario, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Jolene led the update of The Ontario Plan (the City's General Plan) Mobility Element, which revisited roadway classifications, truck routes, and bicycle facilities throughout the City. Following completion of this effort, the City received a Specific Plan proposal that requires changes to planned truck and bicycle routes. She is currently assisting the City with a General Plan Amendment to update the Land Use and Mobility Elements.
36 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr&Peers
City of Barstow General Plan Update (Barstow, CA)
Associate -in -Charge. Jolene led the update of the City's Mobility Element, which is now in the public review and comment period. The update was prompted by the incorporation of additional land to support the expansion of the BNSF Railway's Barstow rail yard known as the Barstow International Gateway (BIG). This effort required revisiting the City's bikeway network and designated truck routes to minimize conflicts.

SBCTA & WRCOG Assembly BiII 98 (AB 98) Guidance (San Bernardino & Riverside Counties, CA)
Principal -in -Charge. Following the passage of AB 98 on September 30, 2024, Jolene led a regional effort for SBCTA and WRCOG member agencies to assist them with implementation. AB 98 requires jurisdictions to adopt truck routes consistent with the legislation, such as using roadways that avoid sensitive receptors. For this effort, her team mapped all existing truck routes and developed guidance on updating development standards and codes to comply.

City of Jurupa Valley Freight Study (Jurupa Valley, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Jolene is currently leading the City's AB 98 compliance and Mobility Element Update with a special focus on improving safety by reducing truck -involved collisions and conflicts. This effort consists of a robust public outreach process to identify areas of concern, such as bike/ped concerns, a deep analysis of truck movements throughout the City, and a full update to the City's Mobility Element.

City of Colton AB 98/SB 415 Implementation (Colton, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Jolene is leading the implementation of Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), which superseded AB 98 on October 3, 2025, for the City of Colton. This effort included a robust public outreach and interjurisdictional coordination effort combined with data analysis to identify preferred truck routes throughout the community. Pursuant to the legislation, Colton was required to incorporate truck routes into its General Plan by January 1, 2026. Doing so also required an addendum to the General Plan EIR and tribal consultation. Currently, Jolene is ensuring the code amendments comply with the law's zoning and building standards.

City of Industry On -Call Transportation Planning Services (City of Industry, CA) Project Manager. Jolene is leading this on -call transportation support services contract with the City, which began in 2021. The majority of the support has been peer review of transportation impact studies, and preparation of VMT analyses for City -led projects.

City of Coachella RAISE (BUILD) 2025 Grant (Coachella, CA) Project Manager. Jolene managed the USDOT grant application for a new interchange at SR 86 at Avenue 50. The effort consisted of data collection for updating the BCA, preparing all required grant sections, and preparing graphics that demonstrate the Project's importance.

San Gabriel Valley COG VMT Tool Update
Project Manager. Jolene assisted 27 SGVCOG member cities comply with the initial SB 743 requirements. This effort began in 2019, and most recently, she worked with the participating cities to update their thresholds, transportation study guidelines, and the online VMT Assessment Tool to reflect the SCAG 2024 RTP/SCS.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 37

Fehr & Peers
Education
Master of Urban and Regional
Planning, University of
California, Irvine, 2018
Bachelor of Science in
Kinesiology, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, 2015
Registrations
League of American Bicyclists —
League Certified Instructor
(LCI)
Federal Aviation Administration
Part 107 Commercial Drone
Pilot
Years of Experience
Total: 10 years
With Fehr & Peers: 2 years
Expertise
Active Transportation Planning
(ATP)
Data Ontology and Strategy
Complete Streets
Implementation
Systemic Safety Analysis
Multimodal Corridor Planning
Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Safe Routes for Seniors (SRFS)
General Plans
Grant Writing / Funding
E -Mobility Planning
Traffic Analysis
Transportation Demand
Modeling
Trevor Lien
Senior Engineer / Planner I Planning Lead
About
Trevor Lien is a Senior Engineer I Planner with ten years of experience delivering data -driven transportation planning and implementation projects across Orange, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and Riverside counties. He brings end -to -end project expertise spanning traffic analysis, multimodal complete streets, environmental/ CEQA, data ontology, systemic safety, active transportation, e -mobility, freight and goods movement, first/last-mile connectivity, grant/implementation planning, and Safe Routes to School and for Seniors. The ethos Trevor embodies is: 1) attention to detail with a clear vision, 2) efficiency in everything, and 3) balanced insight driven by data.

Relevant Project Experience
SBCTA Active Transportation Plan Update & Data Management Plan (San Bernardino County, CA)
Project Manager. Trevor updated the countywide Active Transportation Plan (ATP), refreshing multimodal data sources and creating a prioritization methodology for hundreds of bicycle, pedestrian, SRTS, and points -of -interest projects in preparation for SBCTA's funding call. This effort resulted in a robust ATP and Data Management Plan for seamless integration and use in funding and implementation phasing by the SBCTA.

OCTA Active Transportation On -Call Services (Orange County, CA)* Project Manager. Trevor led a multidisciplinary team in providing active transportation support services for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The contract involved ATP and grant -writing technical assistance meetings, as well as guiding the county's SRTS stakeholder committee to develop a vision for SRTS planning. This three-year program advanced OCTA's strategic objectives to address countywide mobility needs.

Los Angeles County Bicycle Master Plan (Los Angeles, CA)* Planning Lead. Trevor guided feasibility analysis, design guidelines, recommendations, and conceptual plan development. The feasibility analysis identified quick -build, implementable segments through a customized GIS tool, while the design guidelines refreshed a decades -old document with cutting -edge research. Trevor's recommendations planned for thousands of miles of bike infrastructure, using feasibility, LTS, safety, and equity metrics as core indicators.

Trevor maintained regular check -ins throughout the project with strategic advisors to ensure the project met its goals and delivered successful outcomes.

OCTA Mobility Hubs Study (Orange County, CA)
Project Manager. Trevor led the development of a comprehensive mobility hub assessment evaluating ten locations across Orange County. He directed the creation of a multi -phase site prioritization scheme designed to translate theoretical hub locations into sites with high operational potential. The methodology incorporated dozens of criteria including political will, demand, and administrative / implementation complexity. Trevor worked directly with OCTA staff 38 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr & Peers
to ensure the scoring schema aligned with the agency's vision, goals, and objectives.

Irvine Boulevard Class IV Pilot Report (Irvine, CA)*
Project Manager. Trevor led a multidisciplinary team of engineers and planners in evaluating six separated bike lane options along Irvine Boulevard, a pioneering case study for the City of Irvine. Key deliverables included graphical cross sections, an implementation strategy map for Class IV facilities, and engineering conceptual plans for four intersection types —freeway, large, regular, and T -intersection. Trevor oversaw the development of detailed per -mile cost estimates and presented the Pilot Report to the Transportation Commission.

OCTA E -Bike Safety Plan (Orange County, CA)*
Planning Lead. Trevor oversaw task delivery for this initiative. Key outcomes included an assessment of existing data, non -infrastructure resources, and strategies for e -bike safety, resulting in targeted action items for countywide improvements. The project also incorporated educational e -bike rodeos, virtual workshops, and stakeholder engagement efforts to connect with communities across the county.
"HB In Motion" — Multimodal Implementation Plan (Huntington Beach, CA)* Project Manager. Trevor directed a team of planners and engineers to deliver the plan successfully. Primary outcomes featured phased pedestrian and bicycle networks, along with strategies for integrating e -bike mobility in the city. He facilitated stakeholder and public workshops, collaborated with city officials, and ensured the plan reflected community needs.

San Diego Bicycle Master Plan (San Diego, CA)
Project Planner. Trevor supported the initial phases of the master plan update, conducting a best practices review of local and national bicycle planning efforts and analyzing the state of San Diego's existing network. His work established a data -driven foundation by layering multiple datasets to identify gaps and opportunities across the city. This groundwork informed the development of an implementation -focused bicycle network designed for integration into San Diego's existing funding and delivery processes.

SBCTA Comprehensive Project Hub (San Bernardino County, CA) Project Data and Systems Lead. Trevor led the development and visioning of SBCTA's Comprehensive Project Hub, a centralized, GIS-enabled platform designed to track project lifecycles, funding, status, and performance across SBCTA programs and member agencies. He supported the development of the Proof of Concept and Version 1.0 Roadmap by helping define the guiding vision, phased implementation strategy, and standardized data ontology, including project metadata schema, unique project identifiers, and cross -departmental data integration processes. Trevor's work strengthened SBCTA's ability to manage, visualize, and report on projects.
*Work performed before joining Fehr & Peers
Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 39

Fehr& Peers
Education
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Northeastern
University, 2011
Registrations
Civil Engineer:

California (PE 86774)
Arizona (PE 68882)
Hawaii (PE 17856)
Utah (PE 13889397-2202)
Road Safety Professional 1
(TPCB)
Years of Experience
Total: 16 years
With Fehr & Peers: 9 years
Affiliations
National Committee on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices
(NCUTCD), Technical Member
ITE Pedestrian & Bicycle
Standing Committee Executive
Committee Member
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Member
Certifications
Roadway and Interchange
Lighting Design Training —MD
State Highway (2014)
Sustainable Transportation
Professional (STP) Certification
— Greenroads Foundation
(2013)
Signing & Pavement Marking
Design Training — MD State
Highway (2013)
Claude Strayer, PE, RSP,
Principal I Engineering Lead
About
Claude is a principal transportation engineer with over 16 years of experience.

Specializing in design, his experience includes managing projects focused on signing and striping, design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, traffic signal upgrades, wayfinding, temporary traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and lighting enhancements. He is well -versed in numerous industry standard references including the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, is a certified road safety professional (Level 1) and serves on the Executive Committee of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Standing Committee of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).

He has served as Engineer of Record and led teams of designers on a variety of other transportation engineering projects such as temporary traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and lighting. He also has experience performing traffic analysis as well as studies with respect to parking and traffic circulation.

Relevant Project Experience
SDSU Mission Valley Campus Engineering (San Diego, CA)
Project Manager. Fehr & Peers handled the transportation planning analysis and design services for the planned SDSU Mission Valley campus at the SDCCU (formerly Qualcomm) Stadium site. This included assisting with the site planning and development of the overall mobility network, which involved multimodal facilities and design of two multilane roundabouts. This included the preparation of the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the environmental document that included the traffic operations analysis (i.e., level of service at intersections, on roadways, and on freeway facilities). We are currently working at the final design level of the design including roadway signing and striping and traffic signals PS&E for both on and off -site improvements.

SANDAG North Park Mid -City PS&E (San Diego, CA)
Fehr & Peers completed the planning, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for 11 traffic signal modifications along the Meade, Georgia, and Landis bikeways in the North Park -Mid City area of San Diego, as well as the wayfinding design for the Meade and Landis bikeways. The signal modifications included the preparation of 100% plans that addressed the planned removal of separate left -turn lanes at numerous intersections, the installation of curb extensions/bend outs, and modifications to signal phasing. The wayfinding plans included PS&E for confirmation and destination signage based on guidelines previously prepared for SANDAG by Fehr & Peers.

City of Beverly Hills On -Call Traffic Engineering Services (Beverly Hills, CA) Lead Engineer. Fehr & Peers serves the City of Beverly Hills with an on -call contract for traffic engineering services. We have assisted the City in a wide range of tasks, including an in-depth assessment of safety and operations at a complex intersection, which included presentations to the City Council and Traffic and Parking Commission; development of a Transportation Division Procedures Manual for internal use; review of site plans for the new bikeshare stations; assessment and implementation of a pilot project to convert traditional school crosswalks to 40 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Fehr&Peers
continental; evaluation of existing and proposed crosswalks to identify appropriate treatments/enhancements; and traffic -related concerns submitted by residents and business owners. We have also prepared plan check comments for temporary traffic control plans associated with minor encroachment permit work and very complex utility work associated with the Metro Westside Subway Project. We have commenced work on a signal modification and corridor synchronized timing plan update along Olympic Boulevard. In addition, we have served as the on -site Traffic Engineer for the City with the recent retirement of City staff.

LABOE Complete Streets Project (Los Angeles, CA)
Engineering QC. Fehr & Peers served as a subconsultant to develop complete streets project recommendations for three corridors (Culver Boulevard, Highland Avenue, and La Brea Avenue) on the City of Los Angeles High Injury Network (HIN). Fehr & Peers led a Roadway Safety Assessment and ADA assessment of each corridor which included a multidisciplinary team of both local and outside agency experts from around the country. The safety and ADA assessment along with a review of existing traffic patterns and future plans for each corridor informed the development of detailed concept plans for each corridor. Fehr & Peers prepared the detailed concept plans for complete streets elements including new and modified traffic signals, crosswalks, and intersection signing and striping. Fehr & Peers also assisted with cost estimation and the preparation of the final Project Development Reports for each corridor that will be used to inform the development of PS&E.

Honolulu Complete Streets Planning & Design (Honolulu, HI) Engineer of Record. Fehr & Peers conducted multimodal transportation analysis, complete streets planning, and design plan development for 15.6 miles of bikeway facilities throughout Honolulu's Primary Urban Center (PUC). This project was envisioned as a critical first phase of the expansion of a low traffic stress bicycle and pedestrian network, and a trophy project for Honolulu's leadership in innovative bikeway planning and design. A key component of our work focused on the design, which Mr. Strayer contributed to, of Complete Streets that provide improved and balanced bike, pedestrian, transit, and vehicular mobility and access while supporting the civic life of streets and an economically and environmentally sustainable context. Mr. Strayer was the project manager of the design phase which included final (PS&E) design of signing and striping, bicycle facilities, and traffic signal modifications, specifically for Pensacola Street between Wilder Avenue and Waimanu Street.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle Et Pedestrian Master Plan 41

Fehr & Peers
Years of Experience
Total: 10
With Fehr & Peers: 1
Education
Master of Urban Placemaking
and Management,
Pratt Institute, 2019
Bachelor of Arts,
Communication,
University of California, Santa
Barbara, 2008
Affiliations
WTS-Los Angeles
Mentorship Program
Participant, 2024
Coro New York Leadership
Center
Neighborhood Leadership
Program Participant, 2020
Presentations
Sam Schwartz (now TYLin)
Open Streets Webinar,
Panelist 2022
Urban Design Forum
Good Form Series,
Presenter 2022
Kristin Brown
Senior Engineer/Planner I Outreach Lead
About
Kristin is a placemaking and planning professional that first connected with community engagement by volunteering with her local neighborhood association.

Throughout her career, Kristin has been deeply involved in diverse community engagement efforts that support public space management and operations, community programming, and advocacy. Her work helps transform neighborhoods by creating and maintaining healthy, vibrant, and sustainable communities.

Select Project Experience
LADOT Olympics Active Transportation Corridors (Los Angeles, CA) Engagement and Grant Support. Fehr & Peers is supporting the City of LA in delivering 40 miles of complete street projects ahead of the 2028 Olympic & Paralympic Games. In addition to extensive technical analysis, Fehr & Peers is leading large-scale community engagement efforts along each corridor. Our strategy involves a carefully designed survey to help gather feedback, supported by a series of pop-up events to connect with community members in spaces they already frequent. Kristin is currently coordinating all graphics for the project's upcoming grant application.

Oxnard Safe Routes to School (Oxnard, CA)
Engagement Analyst. As part of a multiyear effort developing Safe Routes to School plans for the City of Oxnard, Fehr & Peers led multiple phases of engagement, gathering data both pre- and post -project. Kristin led the analysis of this data, studying the effect of the project on how Oxnard students travel to school.

Columbus Avenue Business Improvement District (BID) Open Streets Program* (New York, NY)
Project Manager. Kristin led all planning, engagement, communications, resourcing, staffing, programming, and analytical components of creating a nine -block Open Streets program for the Columbus Avenue BID. She engaged with residents, business owners, city agencies, and elected officials to garner support and address concerns, all while opening the program within an ambitious two -month time frame. The first season saw a 45% increase in pedestrian traffic with over 30k visitors to the program, garnering a 98% approval rating from business owners and residents.

Brooklyn Bridge Park Community Engagement Workshop and Vision Plan, Emily Warren Roebling Plaza* (Brooklyn, NY)
Project Manager. Kristin worked closely with the Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation and the Brooklyn Bridge Park Community Advisory Council to develop and lead a community workshop that would determine the direction of the last plaza to be built in Brooklyn Bridge Park. She helped coordinate interviews with over 30 individual stakeholders, and led breakout sessions at an engagement workshop with over 80 attendees. She analyzed both quantitative and qualitative data from the feedback gathered, and used the findings to help develop a vision plan for the park, making recommendations for design, programming, and governance. *Work performed before joining Fehr & Peers
42 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan

Sample Project Sheets
Appendix
We bring the ability to develop tailored project sheets that clearly present relevant experience, using multi -page formats where appropriate to align with Beaumont's priorities and decision - making needs.

Representative examples are provided on the
following pages to illustrate this approach.

Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan 43

CONNECT RC SAMPLE PROJECT SHEETS
PROJECT IDEA 07
Cucamonga Creek Trail
Resurfacing & Crossing
Enhancements
Base Line Road C > Demens Creek Trail

CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
Distance 06 Miles
Existing Bike Facility Class I Off -Street Bikeway
PlanRC Bike/Pad Priority Yes
Schools Valle Vista Elementary
Population Within
Quarter Mile

3.700

PROJECT BENEFITS
Recommendations
O Class I Bikeway enhancements
along Cucamonga Creek Trail
including trail resurfacing,
wayfinding improvements, and
at -grade crossing improvements,
including a high -visibility
crosswalk that ties in with
existing signal at the following:
▪ Carnelian Street end wed Hill
Country Club Drive
(0 Access to Schools) (O Access to Jobs/Retail I o Access to Parks & Re

PROJECT AREA FEATURES
3rd
tie Creek hall resurfacing end ace cements would
greatly Improve ® the biking experience on the trail.

Preliminary Cost $497,000
Estimate:
4V4P.

F-
Ongoing Planning Effort
The 2023 2024 Capital
Improvements Program (CIPIlists
Cucamonga Creek Channel trail
between Foothill Boulevard and
Base Line Road for trail pavement
resurfacing. This will enhance
pedestrian and bicyclist safety
by restoring the existing trail to a
new condition and extending the
pavement life.

Existing Facility
- Class I Bike Path
- Class II Bike Lane
- Class 111 Bike Route
27 45
Proposed Facility

1.1 Traci Resurfacing
111 Hlgh-VIslbllcy Crosswalk
® We'd -Waling Improvements
AddRtonal stgnage can help direct
bicyclists onto the paved paths and
pedestrians 8 equestrian users onto
the PG paths.

Cucamonga — Red Hill

PROJECT IDEA II
Hermosa Avenue
Buffered Bike Lane and New Sidewalks

CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
Distance 1.0 Mlles
Typical Width 42'-60'
Number of Lanes 2-5
Posted Speed Llmh 45 MPH
AADT Estimate (2019) 10,911
Street Typology Bicycle Corridor
Existing Bike Facility
PleoRC Bike/Ped Priority Yes
Schools
Doha Merced Elementary
Rancho Cucamonga Middle
Transit
Trail Connection
Percent of Population
Recommendations
O Class II Buffered Bike Lane along Hermosa
Ave. from Baseline Rd. to Foothill Blvd.

O Enhance comfort through lane reduction
from Baseline Pd. to Foothill Blvd. from
4 -lanes to 2 -lanes,
OAdd Sidewalks along west side of Hermosa
Ave. at the following locations:
i Between approximately ti5 ft. south of Hemlock St. and 275 ft. north of Norwick St.
▪ About 300 ft. south of 8th Street foropproximotely250 ft
Typical Existing Cross -Section: Between Baseline
Road and Foothill Boulevard
Within Quarter Mile 5,040 Recommended Cross section 64' (Restripe to 2 travel lanes from Baseline Road to Foothill Boulevard(
mimmasci

14. Preliminary Cost
$322,000 I I I I I I I
Estimate:

PROJECT BENEFITS
(O Access to Schools) \(a Access to Parks & ec u
(0 Access to Jabs/Retail (0 Access to Transit)
(O Network Connectivity) (0 Collision Histor)
(0 Key Barrier/Gap Closure)
7 5' TT IS try k" 7

PROJECT AREA FEATURES
travel lap long
buf e traffic
fered and provide llowHermosa Ave. can ereer...°ass bicycle facilities improveBuffered bike lanes along Hermosa
Ave. can designate space
e. network
connectivity
44 Proposal for City of Beaumont Bicycle a Pedestrian Master Plan