Agenda packet — Rancho Cordova City Council, April 18, 2022 (part 3 of 11)

L-1
LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET N. MATHER BLVD. & BEAR HOLLOW DR. LOGISTICENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA SHEET INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET TITLE VICINITY MAP Landscape Architect Ph: (510) 353-3952 Contact: Francisco Castellanos PROJECT SITE Architect Ware Malcomb 4683 Chabot Drive, Suite 300 Ph: (925) 480-6146 Contact: Leticia DeBrito Pleasanton, CA 94588 North ima 344 20th Street Oakland, CA 94612 Entitlement Package PROJECT SITE Owner SEQ. Dermody Properties 5500 Equity Avenue Ph: (775) 335-0126 Contact: Elizabeth Teske Reno, NV 89502 SITE MAP North L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Landscape Title Sheet Conceptual Planting Plan Conceptual Irrigation Plan Employee Patio Enlargement Planting Imagery Overall Illustrative Conceptual Shade Plan FCBA21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 314 of 1542 ends

WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S1MH: 24 S1 MH: 24 S1MH: 24
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S2 MH: 24 S3 MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1 MH: 24 S3 MH: 24 S3MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S3MH: 24 WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S1MH: 24 L-2 N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0" 0 25 50 100 CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN FCBA21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

DATE REMARKS
architecture
planning
interiors
graphics
civil engineering
4683 Chabot Dr #300
Pleasanton, CA 94588
P 925.244.9620
F 925.244.9621 JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 12-14-2021 PLANNING SUBMITTAL RANCHO CORDOVA
Use of the plans and specifications contained
herein shall be restricted to the original site for
which they were prepared; publication thereof is
expressly limited to such use. Reproduction,
publication, or reuse by any method, in whole orin part, without the express written consent of imais prohibited. Title to said plans remains the soleproperty of ima; visual contact shall constitute acceptance of these restrictions. SIGNATURE DATE
01-21-2022 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL TREE LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14 SYMBOLS SIZE SPACING QTY. REMARKS LANDSCAPE AREA: 147,861 S.F. PROJECT TYPE: PRIVATE WATER SOURCE: POTABLE PERCENTAGE OF EVERGREEN TREES: 53% LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'NATCHEZ' 48" BOX PER PLAN DECIDUOUS, MULTI-TRUNK LAURUS NOBILIS 24" BOX EVERGREEN, LOW BRANCHING PISTACIA CHINENSIS 24" BOX 11 OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' 48" BOX EVERGREEN, STANDARD WUCOLS LOW VERY LOW BIO-RETENTION BASINS LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14 SYMBOLS SIZE SPACING QTY. BACCHARIS PILULARIS 6' W X 1' H 6' W X 2' H 5' O.C. CAREX DIVULSA 24" O.C. 2' W X 2' H ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'HOWARD MCMINN' 5 GAL. 6' O.C. - 6' W X 6' H --- ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET' ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'HUNTINGTON CARPET' GROUNDCOVER LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14 SYMBOLS SIZE SPACING QTY. 1 GAL. 5' O.C. 6' W X 1' H 1 GAL. 6' O.C. 6' W X 2' H-- SHRUB LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14 SIZE SPACING QTY. MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' 5 GAL. 36" O.C. 3' W X 3' H DIETES IRIDIOIDES 5 GAL. 30" O.C. 2' W X 2' H CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' 5 GAL. 48" O.C. 5' W X 4' H SYMBOLS PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'BRIGHT N TIGHT' 5 GAL. 6' W X 10' H -
-98
7 BOTANIC NAME FORTNIGHT LILY DWARF MYRTLE CAROLINA LAUREL CHERRY DWARF CALLISTEMON COMMON NAME WUCOLS BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE SWEET BAY COAST LIVE OAK CHINESE PISTACHE SWAN HILL OLIVE 48" BOX LOW 401340 5 WUCOLS HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME WUCOLS DESERT CARPET ACACIA MCMINN MANZANITA COYOTE BUSH EUROPEAN GREY SEDGE LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW SUMMARY DATA VINE LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14 SYMBOLS SIZE SPACING QTY. REMARKS 14 WUCOLS MODERATE BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME FICUS PUMILA CREEPING FIG 5 GAL. SELF- ATTACHING TO METAL SCREEN MATURE SIZE: 12' W X 25' H MATURE SIZE MATURE SIZE MATURE SIZE ULMUS PARVIFOLIA EVERGREEN ELM 24" BOX 14 PER PLAN 6' O.C. 16' O.C. 6' O.C. QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA DECIDUOUS, STANDARD EVERGREEN, STANDARD DECIDUOUS, STANDARD LOW MODERATE PER PLAN PER PLAN PER PLAN PER PLAN PER PLAN LOW 1 GAL. 1 GAL. 1 GAL. LOW LOW ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET' DESERT CARPET ACACIA ARBUTUS 'MARINA' MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE 24" BOX 40 EVERGREEN, LOW BRANCHING PER PLAN LOW MATURE SIZE 20' W X 25' H 25' W X 30' H 60' W X 50' H 20' W X 20' H 75' W X 65' H 70' W X 60' H 35' W X 35' H PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA LONDON PLANE 24" BOX 23 DECIDUOUS, STANDARD PER PLAN MODERATE 40' W X 80' H LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK BIO-RETENTION BASIN PLANTING SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING, TYP. BIO-RETENTION BASIN PLANTING SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING, TYP. SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING, TYP. CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE

NORTH MATHER BOULEVARD
BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE PROPERTY LINE SCREENING FENCE ENLARGEMENT A SHEET L-4 NOTES: 1. 30% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVERGREEN 2. ROOT BARRIERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE. 3. MINIMUM 3" DEPTH BARK MULCH IN ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTERS. 4. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPE AREAS. 5. INSTALL A WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL BARK AND/OR ROCK AREAS (AS APPLICABLE). SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY 20'
20'
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY GATE
20'
20' BIO-RETENTION BASIN PLANTING SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY 20'
20'
20' 20'
20'
20'
20'
20' FENCE AT BASIN
ITEM 11.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 315 of 1542 ends

WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S2 MH: 24 S3MH: 24 S2 MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1 MH: 24 S1 MH: 24 S3MH: 24 S3MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S3 MH: 24 WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S1MH: 24
A
M
F L-3
CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION PLAN N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0" 0 25 50 100 FCBA21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

NORTH MATHER BOULEVARD
BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE ZONE 16 ZONE 22 ZONE 24 ZONE 29 ZONE 30 ZONE 35 - 20%4.5' 15.94 89.5 A-19 120 - FURTHEST VALVE SYSTEM 'A' XXX 4.5 85 60 -25 2" - 20%5' 2.5" 2.5" X" 3" 4" 1.5" 2.5" X-X/X" 2" 56.07 90A-18 124.3 2.2 456.3 4085 0 -

33.2 0.6604502.7 120 1.5" SYSTEM 'A' XXX
5 2"8560 123.6

26.2 0
-

33.2 0.6 5.804502.7 1.5" 2" 60 SYSTEM WATER PRESSURE 17 RESIDUAL PRESSURE (#17-#16) PUMP REQUIRED 18 ELEVATION LOSS PRESSURE REQUIRED AT CONTROL VALVE TOTAL PRESSURE REQUIRED (#14+15) TOTAL SYSTEM PRESSURE LOSS (SUM OF #1-#13) BACKFLOW PREVENTER LATERAL LINE LOSS ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE MASTER CONTROL VALVE 1490 FEET OF MAIN LINE (TYPE CLASS 315) XXX FEET OF MAIN LINE (TYPE SCHEDULE 40) FITTING LOSS FLOW METER GATE VALVE BALL VALVE WATER SERVICE LINE WATER METER 31113141615124109876521 PRESSURE LOSS CALCULATIONS WATER METER NUMBER: HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE: ELEVATION DIFFERENCE: WATER METER SIZE: WATER METER ELEVATION: STATIC PRESSURE (PSI): ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE SIZE: TOTAL METER GPM DEMAND: STATIC PRESSURE AT ECV: ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE (ECV): RCV DEMAND: GPM ECV ELEVATION: SIZE DESCRIPTION NO. LOSS (PSI) - LARGEST VALVE ELEVATION LOSS BACKFLOW PREVENTER LATERAL PRESSURE LOSS ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE MASTER CONTROL VALVE 1155 FEET OF MAIN LINE (TYPE CLASS 315) XXX FEET OF MAIN LINE (TYPE SCHEDULE 40) FITTING LOSS FLOW METER GATE VALVE BALL VALVE WATER SERVICE LINE WATER METER 31113124109876521 PRESSURE LOSS CALCULATIONS WATER METER NUMBER: HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE: ELEVATION DIFFERENCE: WATER METER SIZE: WATER METER ELEVATION: STATIC PRESSURE (PSI): ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE SIZE: TOTAL METER GPM DEMAND: STATIC PRESSURE AT ECV: ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE (ECV): RCV DEMAND: GPM ECV ELEVATION: SIZE DESCRIPTION NO. LOSS (PSI) NOTE: STATIC WATER PRESSURE READING AT THE POINT-OF-CONNECTION FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS 60 PSI. STATIC WATER PRESSURE READING WAS PROVIDED BY GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY ON 10/11/2021. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY STATIC WATER PRESSURE IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2" 2.5" 2.5" X" 3" 4" 1.5" 2.5" X-X/X" 2" 110 25 PUMP SETTING 19 RESIDUAL PRESSURE (#19-#16) 20 60 -24.1 45 39.1 84.1 SYSTEM WATER PRESSURE 17 RESIDUAL PRESSURE (#17-#16) PUMP REQUIRED 18 PRESSURE REQUIRED AT CONTROL VALVE TOTAL PRESSURE REQUIRED (#14+15) TOTAL SYSTEM PRESSURE LOSS (SUM OF #1-#13) 141615 110 25.9 PUMP SETTING 19 RESIDUAL PRESSURE (#19-#16) 20 IRRIGATION DESIGN INTENT CONSUMING WATER FOR IRRIGATION IN EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS HAS BECOME MORE EXPENSIVE. THE PROPOSED PROJECT'S IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPING ACT 2006 AND THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 23, DIVISION 2, CHAPTER 2.7, AND EXECUTIVE ORDER B-29-15. IRRIGATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE SUPPLIED WITH NON-POTABLE WATER FROM A NEW IRRIGATION-USE WATER METER. THE WATER METER WILL OPERATE A DEDICATED, REDUCED-PRESSURE TYPE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY TO PROTECT THE NON-POTABLE WATER SYSTEM. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL UTILIZE A HIGH EFFICIENCY IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO INCLUDE A SMART CONTROLLER, DRIP IRRIGATION AND POP-UP LOW SPRINKLERS. TREES WILL BE IRRIGATED ON A BUBBLER SYSTEM FOR DEEP ROOT WATERING. ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ON THE SITE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT RUNOFF, OVER-SPRAY, LOW HEAD DRAINAGE AND OTHER SIMILAR CONDITIONS WHERE WATER FLOWS OUT OF THE DESIGNATED LANDSCAPE AREA. DESCRIPTION LOW WATER USE PLANT MATERIAL WITH SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION SYMBOL LOW WATER USE PLANT MATERIAL WITH PRESSURE-REGULATED OVERHEAD SPRAY SPRINKLERS (BIO-FILTRATION BASIN) IRRIGATION HYDROZONE LEGEND ITEM 11.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 316 of 1542 ends

WMH: 28
W MH: 28 MH: 28 L-4 S C A L E: 1/8" = 1' - 0" 0 4 8 16
EMPLOYEE PATIO ENLARGEMENT SECURED SITE FURNISHINGS ,TYP. (6 TABLES) A ENLARGEMENT A 1/8"=1'-0" CONCEPTUAL WALL DETAIL 1"=1'-0" FCBA21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 317 of 1542 ends

L-5
PLANTING IMAGERY FCBA21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 318 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 319 of 1542 ends

WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S1MH: 24 S1 MH: 24 S1MH: 24
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S2 MH: 24 S3 MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1MH: 24 S1 MH: 24 S3 MH: 24 S3MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S2MH: 24 S3MH: 24 WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28
WMH: 28 S1MH: 24 L-7 N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0" 0 25 50 100 CONCEPTUAL SHADE PLAN FCBA21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH MATHER BOULEVARD
BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE 25% - 35' R 50% - 35' R 50% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 50% - 75' R 100% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 25% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 25% - 35' R 25% - 35' R 50% - 75' R 100% - 35' R 50% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 100% - 35' R 25% - 75' R 50% - 75' R 25% - 35' R PARKING LOT 1 AREA: 17,099 S.F LOT 1 SHADE AREA: 8,844 S.F LOT 1 SHADE PERCENTAGE: 52% SHADED PARKING AREA - SUMMARY DA 50% - 35' R 25% - 35' R 25% - 35' R ITEM 11.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 320 of 1542 ends

C202
C203
C201
© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L

E G U A

N O U R A N D M E I K L E
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 321 of 1542 ends

© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E C202 C203
C201
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 322 of 1542 ends

C202
C203
C201
© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 323 of 1542 ends

C302
C304 C301
C303
© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 324 of 1542 ends

© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E C302
C304 C301
C303
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 325 of 1542 ends

© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E C302
C304 C301
C303
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 326 of 1542 ends

© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E C302
C304 C301
C303
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 327 of 1542 ends

© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E C402 C403
C401
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 328 of 1542 ends

© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E C402 C403
C401
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 329 of 1542 ends

C402
C403
C401
© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 330 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 331 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 332 of 1542 ends

SACRAMENTO METRO FIRE DATE
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 333 of 1542 ends

LOGISTIC CENTER AT

RANCHO CORDOVA

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
SNR21-0064-00

12.06.2021
TOTAL PAGES IN THIS PACKAGE: 7
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 334 of 1542 ends

PAGE 2 LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA 12.06.2021
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
CURRENT LANDSCAPING This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 335 of 1542 ends

PAGE 3 LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA 12.06.2021
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
CURRENT LANDSCAPING This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 336 of 1542 ends

PAGE 4 LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA 12.06.2021
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
CURRENT LANDSCAPING This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 337 of 1542 ends

PAGE 5 LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA 12.06.2021
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
FUTURE LANDSCAPING This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 338 of 1542 ends

PAGE 6 LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA 12.06.2021
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
FUTURE LANDSCAPING This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 339 of 1542 ends

PAGE 7 LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA 12.06.2021
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
FUTURE LANDSCAPING This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 340 of 1542 ends

Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
BAC Job # 2021-192
Prepared For:

DPML Bear Hollow, LLC.

Prepared By:

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc.

Dario Gotchet, Principal Consultant
January 26, 2022
Attn: Shelagh Danna
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. ● P.O. Box 7968, Auburn, CA. 95604 ● Phone: (530) 537-2328 ● bacnoise.com ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 341 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 1 ends

Introduction
The Logistic Center is located north of Mather Boulevard and west of Bear Hollow Drive in the City of Rancho Cordova, California. The project consists of the development of an industrial building (approximately 155,000 ft2) containing warehouse and office uses, and associated parking. The location of the project site with aerial imagery is shown in Figure 1. The project conceptual site plan is presented as Figure 2.

Due to the potential for elevated project-generated on-site operations noise levels at nearby residential uses, Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) was retained to prepare this noise assessment. Specifically, the purposes of this assessment are to quantify noise levels associated with project on-site industrial operations, to assess the state of compliance of those noise levels with applicable City of Rancho Cordova noise standards, and if necessary, to recommend measures to reduce those noise levels to acceptable limits.

Noise Fundamentals and Terminology
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. Sound is defined as any pressure variation in air that the human ear can detect. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), they can be heard, and thus are called sound. Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale allows a million-fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB. Another useful aspect of the decibel scale is that changes in levels (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness. Appendix A contains definitions of Acoustical Terminology. Figure 3 shows common noise levels associated with various sources.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by weighing the frequency response of a sound level meter by means of the standardized A-weighing network.

There is a strong correlation between A-weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and community response to noise. For this reason, the A-weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A-weighted levels in decibels.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the “ambient” noise level, which is defined as the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given noise environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq) over a given time period (usually one hour). The Leq is the foundation of the Day-Night Average Level noise descriptor, Ldn or DNL, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 342 of 1542 ends

Legend
0 500 Figure 1
Scale (Feet)
250
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
Project Area
Project Boundary (Approximate)
Long-term Noise Measurement Location
1 2
3 # Existing Residential Uses
Existing Solid Noise Barriers
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 343 of 1542 ends

Legend
0 200 Figure 2
Scale (Feet)
100
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
Conceptual Site Plan
On-Site Truck Circulation Route
Truck Trailer Parking Areas
Truck Loading Docks
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 344 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 4 ends

Figure 3
Noise Levels Associated with Common Noise Sources
DNL is based upon the average noise level over a 24-hour day, with a +10-decibel weighting applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because DNL represents a 24-hour average, it tends to disguise short-term variations in the noise environment. DNL-based noise standards are commonly used to assess noise impacts associated with traffic, railroad, and aircraft noise sources.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 345 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 5 ends

Criteria for Acceptable Noise Exposure
Rancho Cordova General Plan
Policies N.1.1 through N.1.4 of the Rancho Cordova Noise Element specifically pertain to noise generated by non-transportation noise sources, such as those associated with project on-site operations. Those policies, and the corresponding actions which are applied to those policies, are provided below:

Policy N.1.1 Establish standards and policies consistent with those in Tables N-1 and N-2 to govern maximum sound levels in new development.

Action N.1.2.1 – Adopt a Noise Ordinance with noise level performance standards, including maximum allowable noise exposure, ambient versus nuisance noise, method of measuring noise, and enforcement procedures.

Policy N.1.2 Ensure that the indoor and outdoor areas of new projects will be located, constructed, and shielded from noise sources in compliance with the City’s noise standards to the maximum extent feasible.

Action N.1.2.1 – Require new development of noise-creating uses to conform with the City’s maximum noise levels.

Action N.1.2.2 – Require an acoustical analysis as part of the environmental review process when noise-sensitive land uses are proposed in areas where current or projected exterior noise levels exceed the City’s standards.

Action N.1.2.3 – Require any potential noise impacts identified during the acoustical analysis to be mitigated in the project design to the maximum extent feasible.

Policy N.1.3 Ensure that proposed non-residential land uses likely to exceed the City’s standards do not create noise disturbances in existing noise-sensitive areas.

Action N.1.3.1 - Require an acoustical analysis as part of the environmental review process when proposed non-residential land uses are likely to produce noise levels that exceed the City’s noise standards. The acoustical analysis must be prepared by a qualified person experienced in environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics and must estimate existing and projected cumulative noise levels and compare those levels to the policies within this Element.

Action N.1.3.2 - Require any noise impacts identified in the acoustical analysis to be mitigated in conjunction with the project design.

Policy N.1.4 Mitigate noise created by proposed non-transportation noise sources to comply with the City’s noise standards to the maximum extent feasible.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 346 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 6 ends

Action N.1.4.2 – Consider restricting the hours of operation of loading docks, trash compactors, and other noise-producing uses in commercial areas that are adjacent to residential uses.

The City’s non-transportation noise level performance standards referenced in these policies are provided in Table N-1 of the Noise Element. That table is reproduced in this report below as Table 1.

Table 1
Noise Level Performance Standards For New Projects Affected by or Including Non-Transportation Noise Sources1
Stationary Noise Source
Noise Level
Descriptor
Daytime
7 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Nighttime
10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

Typical Hourly Leq, dB 55 45
Tonal, Impulsive, Repetitive, or
Consist Primarily of Speech or Music Hourly Leq, dB 50 40 1 The City may impose noise level standards which are more or less restrictive than those specified above based upon determination of existing low or high ambient noise levels.

Source: Rancho Cordova General Plan Noise Element, Table N-1.

Existing Ambient Noise Environment within the Project Vicinity The existing ambient noise environment within the project vicinity is defined primarily by traffic on N. Mather Boulevard, Bear Hollow Drive and Airpark Drive, and by aircraft operations associated with Mather Airport to the south. To generally quantify the existing ambient noise environment within the project vicinity, BAC conducted a long-term (48-hour) noise level survey from December 8-9, 2021. Photographs of the noise survey location are provided as Appendix B.

A Larson-Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 820 precision integrating sound level meter was used to complete the noise level measurement survey. The meter was calibrated immediately before use with an LDL Model CAL200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy off the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).

The long-term ambient noise level survey results are summarized in Table 2. The detailed results of the ambient noise survey are contained in Appendix C in tabular format and graphically in Appendix D.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 347 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 7 ends

Table 2
Summary of Long-Term Noise Survey Measurement Results1
Site Description2 Date DNL
Average Measured
Hourly Noise Levels (dBA)
Daytime3 Nighttime4
Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
North of the project site at
residential uses and Airpark Drive
12/8/21 60 59 78 52 73
12/9/21 61 59 79 54 74
1 Detailed summaries of the noise monitoring results are provided in Appendices C and D. 2 Long-term noise survey location is identified on Figure 1. 3 Daytime hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
4 Nighttime hours: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2021)
The BAC noise measurement site was selected to be representative of the ambient noise level environment at the nearest residential uses to the project area, located to the north along Airpark Drive. As indicated in Table 2, average measured noise levels (Leq) at the survey location exceeded Rancho Cordova General Plan daytime and nighttime noise level standards applicable to noise-sensitive uses.

Noise Impacts from Project-Generated On-Site Operations According to the provided site drawings (dated October 1, 2021), the project proposes the construction of an industrial building (approximately 155,000 ft2) containing warehouse and office uses with associated parking. The location of the proposed industrial building is shown in Figure

2. Noise generated by heavy trucks arriving and departing the site, backing into the loading docks, and coupling/decoupling, will be one of the primary noise sources associated with this project.

Once the heavy trucks are docked at the loading bays, they will be loaded and unloaded from within the building, so no outside loading/unloading activities would occur, and noise generated by such activities would be contained within the building. Another primary noise source associated with the project has been identified as mechanical equipment (HVAC). However, it is the experience of BAC in similar industrial projects that mechanical equipment would either be housed in an equipment room or located on the roof of the buildings and shielded by screen walls (parapets).

Noise generated by project-related activities were quantified through a combination of reference noise level measurements and application of accepted noise modeling techniques. Separate discussions of noise generated by on-site heavy truck circulation and trailer coupling/decoupling are provided in the following sections.

The Rancho Cordova General Plan daytime and nighttime performance standards of 55 and 45 dB Leq (respectively) were applied to project on-site operations noise generation and assessed at ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 348 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 8 ends

the nearest existing residential uses. The nearest existing residential uses are represented by numeric values on Figure 1 – identified as Residential 1-3. For the purposes of this assessment, it was assumed that on-site operations would occur during both daytime and nighttime hours.

However, satisfaction of the General Plan’s nighttime noise level standard would ensure for compliance with the General Plan’s less restrictive daytime noise level limit. As a result, the following analyses focus on compliance with the General Plan’s nighttime noise level standard of 45 dB Leq at the nearest residential uses.

On-Site Heavy Truck Circulation
Based on a review of the site drawings, the heavy truck access point will be on the north end of the development off Bear Hollow Drive. The truck access point and on-site truck circulation route and are shown on Figure 2.

The project site plan indicates that the industrial building will have 27 truck loading docks. To assess project on-site truck circulation noise exposure relative to the General Plan’s hourly average (Leq) noise level descriptor, it is necessary to identify the number of truck movements occurring during a typical busy hour of operations. For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the project could have up to 50 on-site heavy truck trips during a worst-case busy hour (believed to be conservative).

Heavy truck arrivals and departures, and on-site truck circulation, will occur at low speeds. To quantify the noise generation of slow moving trucks, BAC utilized single-event passby noise test results for slow-moving heavy trucks conducted at the West El Camino truck stop in Sacramento, California. The passby measurements were conducted at a reference distance of 50 feet at a location suitable for isolation of individual passby events. During the truck passbys, Larson-Davis Laboratories Model 820 and 2900 sound level meters and frequency analyzers were used to quantify noise levels and event frequency content for each event. The results of the heavy truck measurements indicated that maximum noise levels ranged from 69 to 77 dB Lmax, with a mean of 74 dB Lmax. Truck passby levels measured in terms of Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) ranged from 77 to 85 dB, with a mean 83 dB. Based on the conservative estimate of 50 trips per hour, and an SEL of 83 dB per passby, the hourly average noise level generated by on-site heavy truck circulation computes to 64 dB Leq at a reference distance of 50 feet from the passby route.

Assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a moving point source), and a calculated reference noise level of 64 dB Leq at a distance of 50 feet, worstcase on-site heavy truck circulation noise exposure was predicted at the nearest existing residential uses. The results of those predictions relative to the City’s nighttime noise level standard are provided in Table 3.

It should be noted that existing solid noise barriers ranging from 6 to 7 feet-in-height are constructed along the property boundaries of the nearest existing residential uses. The locations of the existing noise barriers are illustrated on Figure 1. To account for the attenuation that would be provided by the existing noise barriers, the predicted noise levels in Table 3 have been conservatively reduced by 5 dB.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 349 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 9 ends

Table 3
Predicted On-Site Truck Circulation Noise Exposure vs. City Nighttime Noise Standard Receiver1 Distance (ft)2
Predicted Noise Level,
Leq (dB)3
City Nighttime Noise
Standard, Leq (dB)
Residential 1 1,000 40
Residential 2 1,200 39 45
Residential 3 1,000 40
1 Locations of nearest residential uses are shown on Figure 1. 2 Distances scaled from on-site truck circulation route to nearest residential uses using the provided site plan and City of Rancho Cordova online viewer.
3 Predicted noise levels include an offset of -5 dB to account for shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers. The locations of the existing noise barriers are shown on Figure 1.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2022)
As indicated in Table 3, worst-case on-site truck circulation noise levels are predicted to satisfy the Rancho Cordova General Plan nighttime noise level standard of 45 dB Leq at the nearest residential uses. The predicted compliance includes consideration of shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers at the locations illustrated on Figure 1. In addition, the predicted noise levels in Table 3 are below or within the range of measured ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the project area (near Residential 1).

Based on the analysis and results provided above, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for this aspect of the project.

It should be noted that screening provided by existing and future intervening structures constructed on adjacent parcels to the north and east of the project would likely reduce projectgenerated on-site operations noise levels at the nearest existing residential uses (Residential 1- 3). However, without having finalized site plans indicating building location and orientation on those properties, the degree in which project operations noise levels would be attenuated is difficult to determine with a high level of accuracy. Nonetheless, excluding any consideration of shielding that may be provided existing or future structures on adjacent properties, the predicted noise levels in Table 3 would satisfy the applicable General Plan noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

On-Site Heavy Truck Backing and Trailering Activities
Noise would be generated during brief periods by trucks backing into warehouse building loading docks and trailer parking areas during trailer coupling/decoupling activities (including backup beepers). It was assumed that heavy trucks would not be permitted to idle while on-site, and that refrigerator trucks (if applicable), would be plugged into loading bay power. The locations of the truck loading docks and trailer parking areas are shown on Figure 2.

To quantify the noise generated by truck backup warning devices and trailer coupling/decoupling activities, BAC conducted noise level measurements of a similar sized warehouse distribution facility in Patterson, California over a 48-hour period in August of 2015. The noise level results from the Patterson facility indicate that the measured average noise levels for the entire monitoring period were 54 dB Leq and 71 dB Lmax at a distance of 100 feet from the effective noise ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 350 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 10 ends

center of the truck backing, coupling and decoupling area. Based on the reference noise level data provided above, and assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a moving point source), truck backing and trailering noise associated with the loading docks and trailer parking areas was predicted at the nearest existing residential uses.

The results of those predictions relative to the City’s nighttime noise level standard are provided below in Table 4.

As mentioned previously, existing solid noise barriers ranging from 6 to 7-feet-in-height are constructed along the property boundaries of the nearest existing residential uses (illustrated on Figure 1). To account for the attenuation that would be provided by the existing noise barriers, the predicted noise levels in Table 4 have been conservatively reduced by 5 dB.

Table 4
Predicted Truck Backing and Trailering Noise Exposure vs. City Nighttime Noise Standard Receiver1
Distance (ft)2
Predicted Noise Level,
Leq (dB)3 City Nighttime
Noise Standard,
Leq (dB)
Loading
Docks
Trailer
Parking
Loading
Docks
Trailer
Parking
Residential 1 1,100 1,000 33 34
Residential 2 1,300 1,300 32 32 45
Residential 3 1,100 1,100 33 33
1 Locations of nearest residential uses are shown on Figure 1. 2 Distances scaled from closest loading dock and trailer parking areas to residential uses using provided site plan and City of Rancho Cordova online viewer.
3 Predicted noise levels include an offset of -5 dB to account for shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers. The locations of the existing noise barriers are shown on Figure 1.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2022)
The Table 4 data indicate that truck backing and trailering noise levels are predicted to satisfy the Rancho Cordova General Plan nighttime noise level standard of 45 dB Leq at the nearest residential uses. The predicted compliance includes consideration of shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers at the locations illustrated on Figure 1. Further, the predicted noise levels in Table 4 are below the range of measured ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the project area (near Residential 1). Based on the analysis and results provided above, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for this aspect of the project.

As discussed previously, the screening provided by existing and future intervening structures constructed on adjacent parcels to the north and east of the project would likely reduce projectgenerated on-site operations noise levels at the nearest existing residential uses (Residential 1- 3). Nonetheless, excluding any consideration of shielding that may be provided by those structures, the predicted noise levels in Table 4 would satisfy the applicable General Plan noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 351 of 1542 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Page 11 ends

Conclusions
Based on the analysis and results presented in this report, noise levels associated with projectgenerated on-site operations at the proposed Logistic Center are predicted to satisfy the applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise criteria at the nearest existing residential uses.

The predicted compliance includes consideration of shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers at the locations illustrated on Figure 1. In addition, predicted on-site operations noise levels are expected to be below or within the range of measured ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the project area. As a result, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for the project.

It should be noted that screening provided by existing and future intervening structures constructed on adjacent parcels to the north and east of the project would likely reduce projectgenerated on-site operations noise levels at the nearest existing residential uses. However, without having finalized site plans indicating building location and orientation on those properties, the degree in which project operations noise levels would be attenuated is difficult to determine with a high level of accuracy. Nonetheless, excluding any consideration of shielding that may be provided existing or future structures on adjacent properties, the predicted on-site operations noise levels presented in this report would satisfy the applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

These conclusions are based on the operations assumptions cited herein, BAC file data, and the studied site design presented in Figure 2 (dated October 1, 2021). Deviations from the resources cited herein could cause noise levels to differ from those predicted in this assessment. It should be noted that, although noise levels associated with operations at the proposed industrial center are predicted to comply with applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise level limits at the nearest residential uses, it is ultimately up to the future individual businesses/tenants of the development to comply with said noise standards.

This concludes our environmental noise assessment for the Logistic Center in Rancho Cordova, California. Please contact BAC at (530) 537-2328 or [email protected] with comments or questions regarding this assessment.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 352 of 1542 ends

Appendix A
Acoustical Terminology
Acoustics The science of sound.

Ambient Noise The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre-project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

Attenuation The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A-Weighting A frequency-response adjustment of a sound level meter that conditions the output signal to approximate human response.

Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound. A Bell is defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one-tenth of a Bell.

CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level. Defined as the 24-hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 - 10 p.m.) weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of 10 prior to averaging.

Frequency The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz.

IIC Impact Insulation Class (IIC): A single-number representation of a floor/ceiling partition’s impact generated noise insulation performance. The field-measured version of this number is the FIIC.

Ldn Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq Equivalent or energy-averaged sound level.

Lmax The highest root-mean-square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

Loudness A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

Masking The amount (or the process) by which the threshold of audibility is for one sound is raised by the presence of another (masking) sound.

Noise Unwanted sound.

Peak Noise The level corresponding to the highest (not RMS) sound pressure measured over a given period of time. This term is often confused with the “Maximum” level, which is the highest RMS level.

RT60 The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

STC Sound Transmission Class (STC): A single-number representation of a partition’s noise insulation performance. This number is based on laboratory-measured, 16-band (1/3- octave) transmission loss (TL) data of the subject partition. The field-measured version of this number is the FSTC.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 353 of 1542 ends

Legend
Appendix B
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
Photographs of Noise Survey Location
A Site 1: Facing east along residential boundaries and Airpark Drive B
C
Site 1: Facing west along residential boundaries and Airpark Drive Site 1: Facing northeast looking at noise monitoring equipment A
B
C
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 354 of 1542 ends

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 45 72 34 30
1:00 AM 36 64 30 28 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 43 68 34 31 Leq (Average) 62 51 59 58 36 52
3:00 AM 46 71 34 31 Lmax (Maximum) 90 71 78 86 64 73
4:00 AM 52 81 37 34 L50 (Median) 55 39 48 46 30 37
5:00 AM 51 72 39 34 L90 (Background) 48 35 43 43 28 33
6:00 AM 58 86 46 43
7:00 AM 60 75 50 46 Computed DNL, dB 60
8:00 AM 61 77 53 48 % Daytime Energy 90%
9:00 AM 60 86 49 46 % Nighttime Energy 10%
10:00 AM 62 87 55 46
11:00 AM 58 78 49 46
12:00 PM 56 73 48 46
1:00 PM 56 76 50 46
2:00 PM 61 90 52 47
3:00 PM 60 78 51 44
4:00 PM 59 80 48 44
5:00 PM 58 79 47 43
6:00 PM 56 73 45 40
7:00 PM 55 74 44 39
8:00 PM 51 71 41 37
9:00 PM 53 72 39 35
10:00 PM 52 72 39 36
11:00 PM 48 72 38 35
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) GPS Coordinates 38°34'18.02" N
121°17'11.77" W
Appendix C-1
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Wednesday, December 08, 2021
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 355 of 1542 ends

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 48 69 36 33
1:00 AM 45 69 43 37 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 50 72 43 41 Leq (Average) 62 52 59 59 45 54
3:00 AM 54 80 41 38 Lmax (Maximum) 84 71 79 83 69 74
4:00 AM 55 83 42 38 L50 (Median) 53 45 49 54 36 44
5:00 AM 54 74 46 42 L90 (Background) 48 42 45 50 33 41
6:00 AM 59 76 54 50
7:00 AM 62 84 53 48 Computed DNL, dB 61
8:00 AM 62 82 52 48 % Daytime Energy 84%
9:00 AM 59 80 50 48 % Nighttime Energy 16%
10:00 AM 57 79 50 47
11:00 AM 59 84 49 47
12:00 PM 58 83 50 46
1:00 PM 57 83 49 46
2:00 PM 59 76 51 46
3:00 PM 57 74 48 44
4:00 PM 59 77 50 42
5:00 PM 61 84 52 46
6:00 PM 56 75 48 44
7:00 PM 56 75 48 43
8:00 PM 56 74 46 43
9:00 PM 52 71 45 42
10:00 PM 52 70 46 44
11:00 PM 51 71 45 44
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) GPS Coordinates 38°34'18.02" N
121°17'11.77" W
Appendix C-2
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Thursday, December 09, 2021
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 356 of 1542 ends

60 dB
Appendix D-1
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Wednesday, December 08, 2021
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA
Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 357 of 1542 ends

61 dB
Appendix D-2
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Thursday, December 09, 2021
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA
Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 358 of 1542 ends

March 9, 2022
Mr. George Condon, Partner, West Region

DERMODY
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, CA 89502
RE: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE AND TRUCK / AUTOMOBILE CIRCULATION

ASSESSMENT FOR BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE BUSINESS/ PROFESSIONAL SITE,

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Dear Mr. Condon:

As requested, KD Anderson & Associates has completed this assessment of the probable trip generation associated with the uses on the Bear Hollow Drive Business/Professional (BP) site proposed in Rancho Cordova. The project involves construction of a 155,040 sf building in the BP (Business Park) zone at the intersection of Mather Blvd & Bear Hollow Drive. The building would be configured with 147,290 sf of warehouse space and 7,750 sf of supporting office space. The building would be accompanied by 27 truck loading docks, 32 trailer stalls and 98 automobile parking stalls.

Our work has involved review of the characteristics of the proposed project, consideration of potential trip generation rates presented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition, selection of applicable trip
generation rates and calculation of the project’s overall and truck trip generation forecasts. In turn, that information will be used by the City of Rancho Cordova to determine whether the potential traffic impacts associated with the project are inherently less than significant based on the number of trips generated or if subsequent analysis is needed to confirm a finding of no significant impact.

Our work also included identification of the most likely truck route to the site and quantification of the automobile trip distribution on the streets leading to the site.

Trip Generation Rates. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition offers trip generation rates that
are appropriate for most land uses, and we reviewed this reference as well as other available published materials. As noted in Table 1, trip generation rates are available for a variety of uses that might occupy a BP site. In general, the rates are dependent on employee density and the extent of travel to and from the site throughout the day. The buildings used for industrial / warehouse uses typically contain a small area of office space used to support the business operation, and that activity is included in the overall trip generation rates. Each land use category was also supported by truck trip generation rates.

The nature of the occupants of the buildings is unknown. Trip generation rates are available for General Light Industrial Uses (Code 110), and these rates are presented in Table 1 below. Based on the project description, the site could also be developed with Warehouse uses, and the ITE rate for Warehousing (Code 150) has been identified. Finally, specialized warehousing has been a common type of development in the Rancho Cordova area, and ITE identifies High Cube Warehousing (Code 154) as follows:

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 359 of 1542 ends

A high-cube warehouse (HCW) is a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials) prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical HCW has a high level of on-site automation and logistics management. The automation and logistics enable highlyefficient processing of goods through the HCW. The HCWs included in this land use include transload and short-term facilities. Transload facilities have a primary function of consolidation and distribution of pallet loads (or larger) for manufacturers, wholesalers, or retailers. They typically have little storage duration, high throughput, and are high-efficiency facilities. Short-term HCWs are high-efficiency distribution facilities often with custom/special features built into structure for movement of large volumes of freight with only short-term storage of products.

Trip Generation Forecast. The number of peak hour trips associated with the project has been estimated for each land use category, and the results are also presented in Table 1. As shown, as a “worst case”, applying the Light Industrial rate could generate 755 trips over the course of the day (i.e., ½ inbound and ½ outbound) and would suggest 115 trips in the weekday a.m. peak hour and 101 trips in the p.m. peak hour. Alternatively, warehouse space as envisioned in the site plan, would generate 265 daily trips and 26 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 28 p.m. peak hour trips. The forecast associated with High Cube warehousing is even lower (i.e., 217 daily trips with 12 a.m. peak hour and 16 p.m. peak hour trips).

TABLE 1

TRIP GENERATION RATES FORECAST
ITE
Code
Description
Average Trips per Unit
Unit Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
% in % out Total % in % out Total
110 General Light Industrial ksf 4.87 88% 12% 0.74 14% 86% 0.65 150 Warehousing ksf 1.71 77% 23% 0.17 28% 72% 0.18
154 High Cube warehouse ksf 1.40 77% 23% 0.08 28% 72% 0.10 Bear Hollow Drive Project
110 General Light Industrial
155.04
755 101 14 115 14 87 101
150 Warehousing 265 20 6 26 8 20 28
154 High Cube Warehouse 217 9 3 12 4 12 16
Trip Generation Conclusions. The City of Rancho Cordova’s traffic study guidelines typically determine the need for additional traffic impact analysis based on consideration of a project’s overall trip generation estimate. Those projects generating fewer than 1,000 daily or 100 peak hour trips do not typically require traffic impact analysis. If the Bear Hollow Drive BP site is developed with “General Light Industrial” uses (i.e., “worst case”) then the project’s trip generation estimates fall above those thresholds in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 360 of 1542 ends

Truck Traffic. Because the overall volume of traffic created by the project is low, a key issue may be the amount of truck traffic caused by the project and the routes followed by trucks traveling to and from the site. Table 2 presents estimates for the truck trips accompanying site development under the three alternative ITE land use trip generation categories. As indicated total daily truck trip generation (i.e., inbound and outbound total) ranges from 34 to 91 daily trips. The land use category generating the most total vehicle trips (i.e., warehouse) generates fewer truck trips..

TABLE 2

TRUCK TRIP GENERATION RATES FORECAST
ITE
Code
Description
Average Trips per Unit
Unit Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
% in % out Total % in % out Total
110 General Light Industrial ksf 0.25 60% 40% 0.01 50% 50% 0.01 150 Warehousing ksf 0.60 52% 48% 0.02 52% 48% 0.03
154 High Cube warehouse ksf 0.22 49% 51% 0.02 47% 53% 0.01 Bear Hollow Drive Project
110 General Light Industrial
155.04
39 1 1 2 1 1 2
150 Warehousing 93 2 1 3 2 3 5
154 High Cube Warehouse 34 1 2 3 2 1 2
Truck Routes. Most truck traffic to and from uses along the Zinfandel Drive corridor is oriented to and from US 50. While routes selected by automobile drives often reflect the shortest or most direct routes, truck drivers focus on routes that feature few stops that can most easily accommodate the turning requirements of large trucks. Those routes may not necessarily represent the shortest straight-line distance.

In this case, five possible routes have been identified in Table 3. Most truck traffic is expected to be oriented to the west on US 50, and in that direction routes using the Mather Field Road interchange, rather than the Zinfandel Drive interchange, are shorter, avoid most residential areas and have fewer stops. Based on this information, it is likely that truckers would choose Route 2, which avoids all residential areas for travel to the west.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 361 of 1542 ends

TABLE 3
COMPARATIVE ROUTES TO US 50 FOR TRUCKS
Route Path Adjoining Land Use Besides
Industrial / Commercial?
Stops Distance2
S (miles) ignals1 Stop
Signs Total
1 US 50 to Mather Field Rd to International Dr to
Femoyer St to Airpark Dr to Bear Hollows Dr to site

0.15 mi Residential but no fronting
homes.
5 3 8 14.1
2 US 50 to Mather Field Rd to International Dr to
Femoyer St to Mather Blvd to No. Mather Blvd to Bear
Hollow Dr to site
No Residential, no school, no park
5 5 10 14.7
3 US 50 to Zinfandel Dr to Bear Hollow Dr to site 0.5 mi Residential but no fronting homes. School, park 6 3 9 15.2
4 US 50 to Zinfandel Dr to Spoto Dr to N. Mather Blvd
to Bear Hollow Dr to site

0.5 mi Residential but no fronting
homes. Park 8 2 10 15.6
5 US 50 to Zinfandel Dr to N. Mather Blvd to Bear
Hollow Dr to site
No residential, no school or Park
9 2 11 15.6
1 including US 50 off-ramps
2 distance from “Sacramento” using Google Earth Pro
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 362 of 1542 ends

Automobile Trip Distribution. The proposed project would add automobile trips to streets surrounding the project, primarily as a result of travel by commuting employees. The distribution of those trips would primarily reflect the location of residences within the greater Rancho Cordova – Sacramento County / Folsom area, as well as the travel time along alternative local routes that connect the site with the regional circulation network.

Table 4 presents preliminary assumptions relating to trip distribution as well as a tabulation of daily and peak hour trips on each facility.

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 363 of 1542 ends

TABLE 4

PRELIMINARY PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Direction Destination Route Share of
Total Local Street Share
Trips with
Light Industrial Rate
AM PM Daily
East Folsom / El Dorado Co Zinfandel Dr to US 50 20% Bear Hollow Dr 15% 17 15 111 Spoto Drive 5% 6 5 38
North Citrus Heights / Sac Co Zinfandel Dr to US 50 to Sunrise Blvd 35% Bear Hollow Dr 28% 32 28 210 Spoto Drive 7% 8 7 52
South South Rancho Cordova Mather Blvd to Douglas Rd 10% Mather Blvd 5% 6 5 38 N. Mather Blvd to Zinfandel Dr N. Mather Blvd 5% 6 5 38 West Sacramento County International Dr to Mather Field Rd to US 50 30% Bear Hollow Dr 30% 35 31 228
Northeast Stonecreek Neighborhoods Bear Hollow Dr
5%
Bear Hollow Dr 2% 2 2 16
Spoto Drive Spoto Drive 1% 1 1 8
N. Mather Blvd N. Mather Blvd 2% 2 2 16
115 101 755
Index
#
% of Total
Bear Hollow Drive 1 Zinfandel Dr to Airpark Dr 45% 52 45 340 2 Airpark Dr to access 75% 86 76 566
3 Access to N. Mather Blvd 25% 29 25 189
Spoto Drive 4 N. Mather Blvd to Zinfandel Drive 8% 9 8 98 N. Mather Blvd 5 Mather Blvd to Bear Hollow Dr 13% 15 13 38 6 Bear Hollow Drive to Spoto Dr 20% 23 20 151
7 Spoto Drive to Zinfandel Drive 7% 8 7 53
Airpark Drive 8 Femoyer Street to Bear Hollow Dr 30% 35 30 227 ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 364 of 1542 ends

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information.

Sincerely yours,
KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Kenneth D. Anderson, P.E.

President
Attachment: site plan, index map, ITE code 110, 150 and 154 worksheets Bear Hollow Dr BP Trip Generation 03.09.22.ltr
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 365 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 366 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 1

TRIP ASSIGNMENT INDEX MAP
0000-00 RA 3/9/2022

PROJECT

LOCATION
4 1
2 8
3 6
5 7
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 367 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 1:55 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=110&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General … https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=110&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&co… 1/1 General Light Industrial
(110)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 37
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 45
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

4.87 0.34 - 43.86 4.08
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 3.76(X) + 50.47 R²= 0.61
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 100 200 300 400 0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 368 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 1:57 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=110&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Ur… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=110&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&coun… 1/1 General Light Industrial
(110)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 41
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 65
Directional Distribution: 88% entering, 12% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.74 0.02 - 4.46 0.61
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.68(X) + 3.81 R²= 0.66
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 100 200 300 400 0
100
200
300
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 369 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 1:57 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=110&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Ur… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=110&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&cou… 1/1 General Light Industrial
(110)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 40
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 58
Directional Distribution: 14% entering, 86% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.65 0.07 - 7.02 0.56
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.72 Ln(X) + 0.38 R²= 0.55 Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0
100
200
300
400
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 370 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 2:42 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=150&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General … https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=150&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&co… 1/1 Warehousing
(150)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 31
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 292
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

1.71 0.15 - 16.93 1.48
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 1.58(X) + 38.29 R²= 0.92
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 371 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 2:43 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=150&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Ur… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=150&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&cou… 1/1 Warehousing
(150)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 36
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 448
Directional Distribution: 77% entering, 23% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.17 0.02 - 1.93 0.19
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.12(X) + 23.62 R²= 0.69
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 372 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 2:43 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=150&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General U… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=150&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&cou… 1/1 Warehousing
(150)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 49
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 400
Directional Distribution: 28% entering, 72% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.18 0.01 - 1.80 0.18
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.12(X) + 26.48 R²= 0.65
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 373 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 2:45 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=154&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General … https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=154&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&co… 1/1 High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse
(154)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 91
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 798
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

1.40 0.20 - 4.32 0.86
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ****
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 374 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 2:46 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=154&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Ur… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=154&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&cou… 1/1 High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse
(154)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 102
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 846
Directional Distribution: 77% entering, 23% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.08 0.01 - 0.31 0.05
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ****
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 0
100
200
300
400
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 375 of 1542 ends

1/28/22, 2:47 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=154&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General U… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=154&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&cou… 1/1 High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse
(154)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 103
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 840
Directional Distribution: 28% entering, 72% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.10 0.00 - 0.25 0.06
Data Plot and Equation T = Trip Ends
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ****
Trip Gen Manual, 11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 0
100
200
300
ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 376 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 1 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
On-Going Conditions

1. The approved entitlement is for a Major Design Review Permit for the Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova as
described in the City Council staff report dated April 18, 2022 and attached Project Plans (Exhibit A) with conditions herein (Exhibit B), for project number PLND–1021-0015.

Project
Description
On-Going Planning

2. Applicant(s) agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless with Counsel selected by the City of Rancho Cordova
(“City”) and its agents, officers, consultants, and employees (“City’s Agents”) from any and all claims, actions, suits, or proceedings against the City or the City’s Agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by the City, or the City’s Agents concerning the project (collectively “Claim”).

The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. Nothing in this paragraph obligates the City to defend any Claim and the City is not required to pay or perform any
settlement arising from any such Claim not defended by the City, unless the settlement is approved in writing by the City.

General On-Going Planning

Minor modifications that are found to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans such as colors, plant materials, or minor lot line adjustments, may be approved administratively. Major modifications shall be approved by the applicable decision making body.

General On-Going Planning

Page 377 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 2 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
responsibility to pay the balance due, in order to avoid delays in the processing of future permits or recordation of maps. Please email the Finance Department at
[email protected] for the status of your account with the City.

5. The Permit is valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of City Council approval unless an extension is
granted by the Community Development Director or
substantial construction of the permitted use or project has commenced and is diligently pursued to completion.

Expiration On-Going Planning

6. Noise sources associated with construction, repair,
remodeling, demolition, paving and/or grading of any real property must adhere to the development standards
outlined within the City’s Noise Element, RCMC 6.68 and RCMC 16.18.1407(F).

Noise On-Going Code Enforcement
/Building

7. The removal and replanting of landscape not listed on the approved plan set must be consistent with RCMC

23.716.080 through 23.716.090 and reviewed by the
Planning Department prior to the removal. All landscape care, maintenance, and tree pruning must adhere to RCMC

23.716.100 through 23.716.110.

Landscaping On-Going Planning

8. PG&E has existing gas distribution facilities within a Public Utility Easemetn (PUE) along N. Mather Blvd and Bear
Hollow Drive in the area of the proposed landscaping. The Company strongly suggests all vegetation be kept a
minimum of 5-feet away from distribution lines for safety access.

Landscaping On-Going PG&E

9. Applicant shall be responsible for all damage to City streets associated with construction of the project and shall repair any damage as soon as possible.

Sidewalk Repair On-Going Public Works

10. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

Storm Drain
Facilities
On-Going Public Works

Page 378 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 3 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

11. SASD Design Standards and Specifications require
minimum 6-inch lower laterals for commercial and industrial buildings.

Design Standards On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

12. Construction of a grease trap or a sand oil separator may be required. The Applicant must verify with the applicable jurisdiction’s building department.

Grease Trap /
Sand Oil
Separator
On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

13. If any proposed garbage enclosure will contain a drain to the sewer, it must be covered.

Trash Enclosure On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

14. Any use of SASD sewer easements, which is not
compatible or interferes with the construction,
reconstruction, operation, maintenance, or repair of SASD sanitary sewer(s), must not be allowed. Each proposed
use must be reviewed and approved in writing by the
District Engineeer prior to the use of the easement by the Grantor. This includes landscaping.

Sewer Easements On-Going Sacramento Area
Sewer District

15. SMUD has existing underground 12kV facilities along Bear Hollow Drive and N. Mather Boulevard that will need to
remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintain all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities
Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances
during construction and upon building completion. If the requried clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

Existing
Underground
Utilities
On-Going SMUD

16. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its
easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any
damages to the developed property within said easement
that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

Easements On-Going SMUD

17. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applciant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

Relocation or
Removal
On-Going SMUD

Page 379 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 4 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

18. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD
easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD
performing work on the Applicant’s property.

Future Facility On-Going SMUD

19. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the
Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and
appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

Irrevocable Offer
of Dedication
On-Going SMUD
Prior to Approval of Grading Plans

20. Applicant shall complete the trip generation analysis to included an evaluation of th proposed site access
driveways to be approved by the Public Works Department.

Trip Generation
Analysis
Prior to Approval of
Grading Plans
Public Works
Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans

21. Show the design for a fire access roadway of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width, 13-feet, 6-inches of vertical clearance, and turning radii of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside dimension on the improvement plans. The access
roadway shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any proposed building.

The use of turf-block or grass-crete or similar alternate road surfaces is not approved for installation in fire
apparatus access roadways.

Fire Access
Roadway
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

22. Show the design for a minimum of 2 remote fire access roadways. Remote fire access roadways shall be spaced a distance apart that is no less than ½ the diagonal
measurement of the overall project site.

Fire Access Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

23. Show the design for aerial apparatus access. Aerial apparatus access shall conform to Sacramento Metro Fire Districts, Fire Prevention Standard #3.

Aerial Apparatus
Access
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

Page 380 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 5 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

24. Show the design for an approved fire apparatus turnaround.

The fire apparatus turnaround shall conform to Sacramento Metro Fire Districts, Fire Prevention Standard #3. The fire access turn-around shall be located within 50 feet of the end of the access roadway.

Fire Apparatus
Turnaround
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

25. Show on the plan how Fire Lanes will be marked. Fire Lane identification shall be provided along the required fire access roadway. Fire Lane identification shall be in
accordance with the Sacramento Metro Fire Districts Fire Prevention Standard #3 and the California Vehicle Code.

Vehilce parking is prohibited on any street less than 28 feet in width. Vehicle parking is permitted on both sides of streets 36 feet or more in width. Roadway widths shall be measured between the gutter-line or edge of pavement on opposite sides of the road. Identification of fire apparatus access roadways may be required on private roads.

Fire Lanes Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

26. Provide a note on the plan that reads, “Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed live load of 80,000 pounds, with a maximum
axle load of 31,000 poiunds, and meet Public Works
Standards for roadways. A report, prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer, verifying the ability of the road to bear the requried minimum weight, shall be submitted with any plan indicating construction of roadway. Verification of constructed roadway shall be provided by a registered
geotechnical engineer prior to final of the project.”
Fire Apparatus
Access
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

27. Show the location of the required fire hydrants for this project on the improvement plans. Approved fire hydrants capable of providing the required fire flow for the protection of any and all structures shall be located along the fire apparatus access roadway. The required fire hydrants
shall be installed and operational prior to any construction or on-site storage of combustible materials. The minimum Fire Hydrants Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

Page 381 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 6 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
requried fire flow for the protection of commercial
devleopments is 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) at a
pressure of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) for a two-hour duration.

28. Provide Fire Access Agreement between all parcels
connected to and served by fire access. Fire Access
Agreement shall be recorded with the Public Recorders
Office having jurisdiction.

Fire Access
Agreement
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

29. Provide Fire Access Roadway Maintenance Agreement
(RMA) between all parcels connected to and served by the fire access roadway. The Fire Access Roadway
Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction. The roadway
maintenance agreement shall include the following:
 Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface.
 Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway nd
infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen feet six inches (13’-6”) or width of twenty feet (20’)
 Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or
replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage or
striping
 Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening
systems.

Fire Access
Roadway
Maintenance
Agreement
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

30. Drainage Study: Applicant shall prepare and submit a project specific drainage study that includes but is not limited to: a pre- and post-project drainage analysis of the project impacts, identification of offsite project impacts or required offsite improvements, and identification of
proposed connections to the City’s Storm Drainage System with adequate supporting calculations. The drainage study shall conform to the requirements of the Sacramento
Drainage Study Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 382 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 7 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
City/County Drainage Manual (Volume 2), County of
Sacramento Improvement Standards (Section 9), and all
other applicable City standards. The drainage study must be developed and stamped by a Professional Engineer and determined by the City to be accurate and adequate.

31. Stormwater Quality- Post Construction
The improvement plans shall incorporate all applicable post construction stormwater quality measures; including source control, waste management areas) and low impact
development measures into the site improvement plans in conformance with the most recent version of the
Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento
Region. The applicant shall prepare and submit a PostConstruction Stormwater Quality Control Plan that includes details and sizing calculations of all the proposed post construction stormwater quality measures. In addition, a maintenance covenant is required for all proposed post
construction stormwater quality measures, as detailed in Appendix B of the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for
the Sacramento Region.

Stormwater Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

32. Stormwater Quality– During Construction:

SWPPP – the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be executed through all phases of grading and project construction. The SWPPP shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to
ensure that potential water quality impacts during
construction phases are minimized. These measures shall be consistent with the City’s Improvement Standards and Land Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance. During
construction, the applicant shall implement BMPs in
accordance with the SWPPP and the City’s Improvement
Standards.

Advisory Condition: Construction General Permit
Stormwater
Quality
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 383 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 8 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
The project applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit For Storm
Water Discharges Associated With Construction And Land
Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit).

Permits are issued by the State Water Resources Control Board.

33. The SWPPP for the site shall include a contingency plan for the implementation of a process to remove fine clay
sediments prior to discharge to the City of Rancho
Cordova’s storm drain system and/or Waters of the State (e.g., creeks, rivers) to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cordova. A polymer treatment system or
comparable process shall be incorporated in the erosion and sediment control plan as part of the improvement plans submittal.

SWPPP Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

34. Drainage System Design:

The applicant shall submit and obtain City approval of plans and specifications for the construction of public
improvements and all grading. The drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the approved Drainage
Study to accommodate runoff from the ultimate
development and shall meet the City of Rancho Cordova’s Improvement Standards, construction standards, and
Floodplain Management Ordinances in effect at the time of improvement plans submittal.

Drainage System Prior to Approval of
Imrpovement Plans
Public Works

35. All development within the City must comply with the City of Rancho Cordova’s Floodplain Management Ordinance. All
new structures shall be protected from the 100-year (1
percent) flood event. Certified pad elevations (certified by a registered Civil Engineer or licensed Land Surveyor) shall be set at least one and two tenths foot (1.2') above all sources of 100-year flooding (see Section 9-1 of
Floodplain
Management
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 384 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 9 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
improvement standards). The overland release path must
be shown on the improvement plans and the hydraulic
computation must be provided to estimate the flow depths along the overland release paths. The calculations must be in conformance with Section 9-15 of the Improvement
Standards.

36. Provide a permanent concrete stamp, or other permanently applied message to the satisfaction of the City not including paint, which reads “No Dumping-Flows to Creek” or other approved message at each storm drain inlet.

Concrete Stamp Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

37. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

Storm Drain
Facilities
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

38. Number, size, and location of driveways are subject to approval by the Public Works Department.

Driveways Prior to Approval of
Imrpovement Plans
Public Works

39. Enter into a frontage agreement and bond for construction of public improvements per the approved Public Works
plans to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Frontage
Agreement
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

40. A final landscape plan shall be submitted in conjunction with improvement plan and or building permit submittal and approved by the planning and public works departments
prior to issuance of permits and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC 23.716.020. The final
landscape planting and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered licensed landscape architect and include the following items per RCMC 22.180.060:
 Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
 Irrigation Plan
 Soils Test
 Water Use Calculations
 Irrigation Schedule
 Permeability test for LID facilities’ locations
 Soil media specifications (LID features)
Landscape Plan Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 385 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 10 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

41. All landscape strips, medians, etc. that contain trees shall be designed to include continuous root barriers. Trees
shall be appropriately sized for their proposed planters.

Tree Installation Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

42. Provide a pedestrian connection adjacent to the proposed driveway access from the project site to N. Mather
Boulevard. Pedestrian access point on N. Mather shall also include additional signage pointing to ADA accessible route along Bear Hollow Drive.

Additional
Pedestrian
Connections
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

43. To obtain sewer service, construction of SASD sewer infrastructure will be required. Current SASD Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements
must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

Sewer
Infrastructure
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

44. SASD requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SASD’s sewer
system. If there is more than one buildgin in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line or a separate connection to the SASD public sewer line. These improvements must be
shown on the plans.

SASD
Connections
Priro to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer Distrcit

45. Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured
horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

Sewer Clearances Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

46. The project has an approved Level 3 sewer study. Any changes to the approved study may require an addendum.

Sewer Study Prior to the
SUBMITTAL of
Improvement Plans
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

Page 386 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 11 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

47. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and apprutenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-way.

Easement
Dedications
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

48. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum
SMUD requirements for access roads.

Easement
Dedications
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SMUD

49. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the applicant to conduct a pre-engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.

Structural
Setbacks
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD

50. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate
trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

Utility Clearance Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD

51. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD
equipment, transformer location, service conductors).

Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be
found at: https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutionsand-Rebates/Design-and-Construction-Services.

Siting
Requirements
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD

52. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20- feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and
appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

Vehicular Access Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
SMUD
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

53. The Rancho Cordova Police Department has reviewed the plan design for the Logisticenter and has the following RCPD
Recommendations
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Rancho Cordova
Police Department

Page 387 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 12 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
recommendations for the project:
 Any glass doors should be secured with a deadbolt
lock with minimum throw of 1 inch. The outside ring
should be free moving.
 The jamb on all aluminum fram swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to withstand 1600lbs. of
pressure in both vertical distance of 3 inches and a
horizontal distance of 1 inch each side of the strike, so as to prevent violation of the strike.
 Overhead roll-up doors should be so secured on the
inside that the lock cannot be defeated from the outside and should also be secured with a cylinder lock or
padlock from the inside.
 Doors with glass panel and door with glass panels
adjacent to the door frame should be secured with
burglary-resistant glazing or the equivalent, if doublecylinder deadbolt locks are not installed.  Windows that are capable of being opened should be
secured on the inside with a locking device capable fo
withstanding a force of three hundred 300lbs. applied in any direction.
 Parking lots, driveways, ciruclations areas, aisles,
passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to
buildings shall be provided with high intensity discharge lighting with sufficient wattage to provide adequate
illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or abou the premises during the hours of
darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on site. Such lighting
should be equipped with vandal resistant covers. A
lighting level of .5 to 1 foot candle minimum, maintained at ground level, is required. A combination of wall and pole mounted fixtures may be used.

Page 388 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 13 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
 All exterior doors should be provieed with a light source and should be adequately illuminated at all hours to
make clearly visible the presence of any person on or
about the premises and provide adequate illumination
for persons exiting the building.
 Graffiti resistant paint should be used on all exterior surfaces, to allow for efficient cleaning of any graffiti on the structure.
 Shatter resistant glass or glazing should be used for all exterior-facing windows.
 Each premises, while closed for business after dark,
should be sufficiently lighted by use of interior night lights.
 Due to the amount of hours the facility will be
unoccupied, an alarm system should be installed. The
type of alarm is dependent upon the nature of the
individual business.

54. The applicant shall meet the following: Civil Site Plans and Architectural Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm plans shall be submitted prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Please note: The Sacramento Metro Fire
District does not allow deferred submittals for Fire
Sprinkler or Fire Alarm plans.

Plan Submittals Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

55. Where a bridge or elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB-17.

Apparatus Access Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
Metropolitan Fire
Department

56. Property Owner/Applicant shall participate in or provide a funding mechanism for maintenance services for the
project’s stormwater drainage and flood protection system.

This may be accomplished through annexation to the City’s Stormwater Utility Fee District, or other financial
mechanism as may be proposed and provided by the
Maintenance
Services for
Stormwater
drainnge and flood
protection
The annexation shall
occur prior to issuance
of buildign permit. The
annual fee
commences when a
building permit is
Public Works

Page 389 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 14 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Property Owner for the same purpose of providing a
funding mechanism to fund the operation and maintenance of the Project’s stormwater drainage and flood protection system. Costs associated with the annexation shall be
borne by the Property Owner/Applicant through payment of the annexation costs in the amount of $7,000 per
annexation. Contact Elizabeth Sparkman at (916) 851-
8714 with regard to the process to satisfy this condition of approval.
issued

57. Property Owner/Applicant shall participate in or provide a funding mechanism for maintenance services for the fair share of existing and all new public improvements
associated with the project including, but not limited to, streets, bridges/culverts, traffic signals, traffic signs, striping and legends, ITS operations, street lights and safety lights, and public frontage and median landscape improvements.

This may be accomplished through annexation to the City’s Communities Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Street Lighting and Road Maintenance). All costs associated with the
annexation shall be borne by the Property Owner/Applicant through payment of the annexation costs of the CFD
annexation in the amount of $5,000 per annexation.

Contact Elizabeth Sparkman at (916) 851-8714 with regard to the process to satisfy this condition of approval.

Maintenance
Services for Fair
Share of Public
Improvements
The annexation shall
occur prior to issuance
of building permit. The
annual fee
commences when a
building permit is
issued
Public Works

58. Applicant shall complete improvement plans to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Improvement plans shall include, but shall not be limited to:
 All onsite civil improvements
 Civil plan shall include an ADA access plan
 All facilities, including but not limited to, sidewalk, driveways, etc. shall be upgraded to meet current ADA
requirements and City Standards.

Improvement
Plans
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

Page 390 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 15 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
 Provide sidewalk, curb, and gutter improvements along the frontage of Bear Hollow Drive.
 Utility laterals
 Replacement of damaged sidewalk and curb and gutter
along property frontage of North Mather Blvd. shall be
completed to the satisfaction of The Public Works
Department. Sidewalk panels shall be replaced to the
nearest joint
 Replacement of damaged pavement along property
frontage to the satisfaction of The Public Works
Department
 Public improvement plans shall clearly delineate all
transitions to existing improvements
 All improvements to be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
 Complete installation of all improvements shown on
the improvement plan to satisfaction of the City prior
to occupancy

59. Secure City of Rancho Cordova Public Works Department approval of final grading plans, as required by City
Ordinance
Grading Plans Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Public Works

60. The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at
[email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-
6100 to determine if sewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.

Sewer Impact
Fees
Prior to Issuance of a
Building Permit
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

61. Applicant shall submit a a Final Landscape Plan for review with the Building Permit submittal.

Landscape Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Planning

62. The wrought iron fencing surrounding the west side
detention pond shall be removed and the pond remain open unless required by another department or agency.

Landscape Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Planning

63. Applicant shall increase the screening wall height and gate along Bear Hollow to 10 feet in order to properly screen the Screening Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Planning

Page 391 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 16 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
loading dock area from the public right of way.

64. All projects are subject to Sacramento Metro Air District rules and regulations in effect at the time of construction.

Please visit our website to find a list of the most common rules that apply at the construction phase of projects.

Construction
Rules and
Regulation
Prior to beginning of
Construction
Sacramento
Metropolitan Air
District
Prior to Final Inspection

65. During and upon completion of the installation of the landscaping for the project, the project landscape
architect/designer shall certify that the installed landscape complies with the approved plans. Certification shall be accomplished by completion of site visits at key installation milestones. Key milestones at a minimum shall include:
rough grade, soil amendment verification, Plant material inspection, irrigation coverage test underdrain installation (as applicable) and final installation. Certification shall include signed site observation reports, photographs and documentation verifying implementation of soil report
recommendations. Failure to submit complete and accurate documentation to the Planning Department will delay final approval/occupancy of the project.

Landscaping Prior to Final Building
Inspection of the First
Unit
Public Works

66. Install public and onsite improvements per the approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

On-Site
Improvements
Prior to Final
Inspectino of the First
Unit
Public Works

67. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping, the designer shall certify that the landscape complies with all city water conserving landscape requirements. Certification shall be accomplished by completion of a certificate of compliance on a form approved by the director of the city public works department. Failure to submit a complete and accurate certificate of compliance will delay final approval of the project and/or discontinue water service per RCMC Water
Conservation
Requirements
Prior to Final Building
Inspection
Public Works

Page 392 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.2. ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 17 of 17 ends

City Council Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

22.180.090. Upon receipt of the certificate of compliance and site inspection from City staff, the landscaping
performance bond will be released.

68. Record drawings of grading and improvement plans (1 full size and 1 half size hard copy), as well as a compact disc containing said plans in AutoCAD and pdf format, and a
GIS shape file, or equivalent to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be submitted and approved by the Public
Works Department.

Drawing
Recordation
Prior to Final Building
Inspection
Public Works

69. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new or existing buildings in such a position as to be easily read from the street or road fronting the property. The minimum size of the numbers shall not be less than six (6) inches and shall be mounted immediately adjacent to a light
source and shall also contrast with their background.

Addresses Prior to Final Building
Inspection
Sacramento
Metro Fire
ADVISORY:
 FIRE: Any Gates shall be installed in accordance with The County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers Standard. Plan submittal is required prior to installation.
 PG&E: As a reminder, before any digging or excavation occurs, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) by dialing 811 a minimum of 2 working days prior to commencing any work. This free and independent service will ensure that all existing underground utilities are identified and marked on-site.

Page 393 of 1542 ends

RANCHO CORDOVA CITY LIMITS

NAVIGATOR

ELEMENTARY
STONE
CREEK
PARK
SONOMA
PARK

SCHIRRA AVE

FINO CT

FEMOYER ST
A
MICICT

SOLERA DR

ROBOLA WAY

RIOJO WAY

CAP ROCK
WAY

R AINSONG CIR

BYINGTON WAY

ARMSTRONG AVE

ENVERO WAY

GRISSOM AVE

VERDECA
W AY

MATHER BLVD

MACREADY AVE

SUPERFORTRESS AVE

BARDOLINO WAY

QUEENS ARBOR DR

N MATHER BLVD

PORTICO CIR

FEMOYER ST

N MATHER BLVD SPOTO DR

AIRPARK DR

BEAR HOLLOW DR
Sacramento
County
/
1000 ft Buffer
Subject Parcel
Parcels within Buffer
0 0.17
Miles
ATTACHMENT 4 ITEM 11.2.

Page 394 of 1542 ends

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
6850 AIRPORT BLVD
SACRAMENTO CA 95837

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER
AGENCY
700 H ST 7650
SACRAMENTO CA 95814

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
700 H ST STE 4650
SACRAMENTO CA 95814

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
6900 AIRPORT BLVD
SACRAMENTO CA 95837

CURRENT RESIDENT
3678 LEMAY ST
MATHER CA 95655

CURRENT RESIDENT
10625 SUPERFORTRESS AVE
MATHER CA 95655

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1501 I ST STE 10 100
SACRAMENTO CA 95814

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
700 H ST STE 6750
SACRAMENTO CA 95814

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10842 N MATHER BLVD
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10679 BEAR HOLLOW DR
GOLD RIVER CA 95670

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED SCH DIST
1965 BIRKMONT DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742

ELLIOTT HOMES INC
340 PALLADIO PKWY STE 521
FOLSOM CA 95630

CURRENT RESIDENT
10801 N MATHER BLVD
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

ELLIOTT HOMES INC
340 PALLADIO PKWY STE 521
FOLSOM CA 95630

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
6850 AIRPORT BLVD
SACRAMENTO CA 95837

CURRENT RESIDENT
10601 BEAR HOLLOW DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

STATE OF CALIF
707 3RD ST FL 5
WEST SACRAMENT CA 95605

CORDOVA RECREATION/PARK DISTRICT
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR STE 230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10765 N MATHER BLVD
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

DPML BEAR HOLLOW LLC
5500 EQUITY AVE
RENO NV 89502

SHCHERBANYUK LARISA/VIKTOR/ERICA
3541 CAP ROCK WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
3545 CAP ROCK WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

SIN LISENG
992 HILDEBRAND CIR
FOLSOM CA 95630

CURRENT RESIDENT
3549 CAP ROCK WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

KIEU ALEXANDRA
202 W HARVEY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92707

TORRES PAULA T/MINERVA
3448 VERDECA WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

KUTSUMI TAKAHIRO
3444 VERDECA WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
ATTACHMENT 4 ITEM 11.2.

Page 395 of 1542 ends

BATH JOHN/CORAZON
3440 VERDECA WAY
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CORDOVA RECREATION AND PARK

DISTRICT
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR STE 230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CORDOVA RECREATION AND PARK

DISTRICT
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR STE 230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CORDOVA RECREATION AND PARK

DISTRICT
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR STE 230
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
3625 SPOTO DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10949 N MATHER BLVD
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

GPT PROPS TRUST
PO BOX 847
CARLSBAD CA 92018

KIM LAWRENCE
10839 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

WOODBURY BRUCE C/XIULING SU
10849 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10851 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

SNEED CARISSA KEIKO/KINLEY LARRY

JONG/ETAL
4306 KENTWOOD LN
FAIR OAKS CA 95628

EMILY HAULMAN SANCHEZ LIVING
TRUST
10861 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

RODRIGUEZ EDELMIRA S/MANUEL S
10863 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

BELLON JOSHUA MICHAEL/HANNAH
HERAN
10865 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

FAUSTINO RONNIE U/MARIA

GERALDINE B
10871 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10873 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

THOMAS JOJI
653 N SAN MARCOS DR
TRACY CA 95391

EVANS ANDRE D/ELYSHIA L
10879 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

AKEPATI SURESH K/LATHAREDDY

MURAMREDDY
10881 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CHUNG FELIX/PHILIP CAMARILLO
10883 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

MAGALONG EMMANUEL

MIGUEL/JENNY ROSAS
10885 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

GARIGIPATI RAJANI/SRINIVASA RAO

CHUNDRU
10887 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

LEE CHYULJEONG
10889 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

MARCU ABEL/VITA MUDRIK
10891 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CALANZA CRIS F
3668 SPOTO DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

HEMWATTAKIT PIRUN
3664 SPOTO DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

SAINI KURAN
3660 SPOTO DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CURRENT RESIDENT
10893 PORTICO CR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

SHRI JAI RANCHHODRAI INC
4219 E WATERLOO RD
STOCKTON CA 95215
ATTACHMENT 4 ITEM 11.2.

Page 396 of 1542 ends

VERANDA AT STONE CREEK

ASSOCIATION
340 PALLADIO PKWY STE 521
FOLSOM CA 95630

VERANDA AT STONE CREEK

ASSOCIATION
340 PALLADIO PKWY STE 521
FOLSOM CA 95630
ATTACHMENT 4 ITEM 11.2.

Page 397 of 1542 ends

SACRAMENTO SANITATION DISTRICT
10060 GOETHE ROAD
SACRAMENTO CA 95827

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY

SANITATION DISTRICT
10060 GOETHE ROAD
SACRAMENTO CA 95827

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER
AGENCY
10151 FLORIN ROAD
SACRAMENTO CA 95829
PG&E
2730 GATEWAY OAKS DRIVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95833
PG&E
343 SACRAMENTO STREET
AUBURN CA 95603
SMUD
6301 S STREET MS B304
SACRAMENTO CA 95817
SMUD
6301 S STREET MS B304
SACRAMENTO CA 95817
SMUD
6301 S STREET MS B404
SACRAMENTO CA 95817

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN FIRE
10545 ARMSTRONG AVE STE 310
MATHER CA 95655

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT
1965 BIRKMONT DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742

GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
3005 GOLD CANAL DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
2729 PROSPECT PARK DR
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670
ATTACHMENT 4 ITEM 11.2.

Page 398 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 19

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 11.3.

DATE: April 18, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: June Cowles, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL CENTER MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT; PROJECT NO. PLND-1121-0020 PROPERTY OWNER:

Dermody Properties
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, Nevada 89502
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

Dermody Properties
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, Nevada 89502
PROJECT: The applicant requests a Major Design Review Amendment for development of four light industrial warehouse with office accessory buildings totaling 602,004 square-feet that includes parking, lighting, and landscaping located within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area.

FILE: PLND-1021-0020
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Zinfandel Drive and Baroque Drive APN: 072-380-001 thru 018-0000
PLANNER: June Cowles, Senior Planner

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution approving a Major Design Amendment Review for four light industrial warehouse buildings totaling 602,004 square-feet of light industrial warehouse with office accessory buildings that includes parking, lighting, and landscaping for the Stonecreek Industrial Center, subject to the findings contained in the attached resolution and the Conditions of Approval.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would permit the construction of 602,004 square feet of light industrial buildings within the Zinfandel Special Planning Area (“ZSPA”) and allow the applicant to submit for and necessary building permits to begin construction of the proposed light industrial project and associated infrastructure.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project, Stonecreek Industrial Center, is located at the Southeast corner of Zinfandel Drive and Baroque Drive Figure 1: Site Location

Page 399 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 19
Figure 1: Site Location
Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (ZSPA)
The site is located within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (ZSPA). • The Special Planning Area was approved in 2002 by Sacramento County. • The ZSPA includes residential, commercial, business professional, light industrial, park, bike trails, and open space uses.
• A Final Environmental Impact Report was certified for the Special Planning Area in 1998 by Sacramento County and a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted.

Adjacent General, Zoning, and Surrounding Land Uses:

The following Table provides the current use, General Plan/Community Plan, and zoning (Table 1: Surrounding Designations and Existing Uses and Figure 2: Zoning Map) Table 1: Surrounding Designations and Existing Uses
General Plan Zoning Land Use
Subject
Property
Light Industrial ZSPA Light Industrial Proposed Light Industrial buildings
North Light Industrial and
Low Density
Residential
Open Space and
ZSPA Low Density
Residential
Bike Path and
Single Family residential
subdivision
South Open Space and Light
Industrial
Open Space and (ZSPA)
Light Industrial
Bike Path and Undeveloped
land

Page 400 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 19
East Light Industrial, Open
Space and Public
Quasi
ZSPA Light Industrial, Open
Space, and Parks Open
Space Habitat
Water Tank, Bike Path, and
Folsom Canal
West Light Industrial ZSPA Light Industrial Industrial Warehouse building
Figure 2: Adjacent Zoning and Land Uses:

Mather Airport Overfly Safety Zone
The project site is located within the Mather Airport overfly safety zone which is “governed” by Sacramento Area of Council of Governments and the Mather Airport Land Use Plan. Figure 3:

Mather Airport Overfly Safety Zone.

Zone 1 (depicted in purple) is the Clear Zone.

Zone 2 (depicted in green) is the Approach-Departure Zone. The proposed project, outlined in red, is located within the Approach-Departure Zone.

Page 401 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 19
Figure 3: Mather Overfly Safety Zone
Mather Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan
The Mather Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan dictates/imposes/controls the safety zone surrounding the runways.

The concerns of the airport land use planning fall into three categories:
• Height Restrictions- protecting the navigable airspace around airports for aircraft safety;
• Noise Compatibility- minimizing the number of people exposed to noise from aircraft operations;
• Safety of Persons on the Ground- minimizing the number of people exposed to hazards related to aircraft operations and accidents.

Thoughtful planning in these three areas, reflected in land use policies and regulations:
• will minimize the exposure of the public to noise and safety hazards; • will provide safer aircraft operations;
• and will help protect the airport and the public resources it represents from encroachment by incompatible land development.

The Mather Airport Land Use Plan includes a Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Safety table. The Table list land use categories that are not allowed and allowed uses with some restrictions such as the following within the Overfly Safety Zone; • Land uses that attract large concentration of birds within approach-climbout areas are not allowed.
• Land uses that produce smoke are not allowed
• Land uses with flashing lights are not allowed
• Land uses that reflect light are not allowed
• Land uses that generate electronic interference are not allowed • Land uses related to flammable materials are not allowed • Some land uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration of people.

A large concentration of people is defined as a gathering of individuals in an area that

Page 402 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 19
would result in an average density of greater than 25 persons per acre per hour during any 24 hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time.

All proposed uses within the Mather Airport Approach-Departure are reviewed by the Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG).

Previous Entitlement Approval:

The project site had previous entitlements that were approved as follows:

April 2006: Tentative Parcel Map that included the light industrial zoned area to the west and south. Divided 3 parcels into 93 parcels.

Feb 2009: Tentative Subdivision Map Amendment and Design Review that included amending the project site into 10 parcels to accommodate 10 industrial buildings.
2017: The Tentative Subdivision Map expired in 2017
June 2019 Tentative Parcel Map for 18 parcels and a Major Design Review for 603,830 square foot light industrial buildings to include parking, lighting, and landscaping. Figure 4: 2019 Stonecreek Industrial Site Plan Figure 4: 2019 Stonecreek Industrial Site Plan
Existing Conditions:

The site has been previously graded and includes grassland. The existing bike paths with landscaping are located along the north, south, and east property lines. Figure 5: Baroque Drive Street View. Along the bike path to the south is a drainage ditch. A pedestrian crossing

Page 403 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 19
signal is located on Zinfandel Drive, close to the southern property line. Figure 6: Zinfandel Drive Street View. A water tower is located adjacent to the northeast corner.

Figure 5: Baroque Drive Street View
On Baroque Drive (bike path along the north property line) looking southwest Figure 6: Zinfandel Drive Street View
On Zinfandel Drive (bike path along the south property line) looking northeast

ANALYSIS
The proposed Stonecreek Industrial Center Major Design Amendment project, Table 2:

Proposed Stonecreek Information, includes four (4) warehouse/office buildings totaling 602,004 square feet with parking, lighting, and landscaping as follows:

Table 2: Proposed Stonecreek Information
Building Bldg Sqft Site Acres Vehicle Parking
Spaces
Building
Dock Stalls
Trailer Parking
Spaces
A 169,536 10.68 204 37
B 169,536 11.19 113 39
C 137,136 9.92 127 39
D 125,796 8.87 161 35
Total 602,004 40.65 605 150 85

Page 404 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 19
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:

The proposed Stonecreek Industrial Center is located within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area designation of Light Industrial. Target uses for this area include limited industrial uses. The proposed project use is consistent with the General Plan designation.

ZONING CODE:

The project site is zoned Light Industrial Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (LI ZSPA) which allows for industrial/retail flex and manufacturing and warehousing uses. As stated earlier the Stonecreek Industrial Center is also located within the Mather Airport Approach-Departure Zone which limit the uses in this area.

MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT:

Site Design
The applicant, Dermody Properties, is proposing the following:
• Four (4) warehouse/office buildings totaling 602,004 square feet that will be built in 2 phases.
• 605 vehicle parking spaces
• 150 building dock stalls
• 85 trailer parking spaces, may be installed at a later date shown in Phase 2 • 3 driveways and a new traffic signal on Zinfandel Drive • An emergency vehicle access driveway on Baroque Drive The proposed Stonecreek Industrial Center site plan layout includes building front elevations facing the north (along Baroque Drive) and the south (along the bike path) with the rear elevations that include truck dock doors facing interior to the site. The proposed uses for the four buildings are Warehouse use: 511,703 sqft and Office use 90,301 sqft. Figure 7:

Proposed Site Plan. The map will be consistent with the site plan development as 4 lots or less as a condition of approval.

Page 405 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 19
Figure 7: Proposed Site Plan
The two northern building front elevations face Baroque Drive and the southern building front elevations face the bike path trail and canal. Figure 8: Proposed Phased Site Plan. The side elevations of Building A and D will be facing Zinfandel Drive and include decorative sound walls that will partially screen the rear elevations/dock doors. Figure 9: Building A and D Side Elevation Locations with Sound Walls.

Page 406 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 19
Figure 8: Proposed Phased Site Plan
Figure 9: Building A and D Side Elevation Locations with Soundwalls Decorative
Sound walls
Building A
Zinfandel Drive

Page 407 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 10 of 19
The site plan includes truck trailer parking that is located on the eastern side of the site. Figure 10: Truck Trailer Parking Location. The applicant states that the truck trailer parking location may be installed at a later time. A condition of approval has been included as follows: “The truck trailer parking shall be screened from Baroque Drive with a solid fence and landscaping.” Vehicle parking and landscaping surround the proposed four buildings. The southern existing bike and pedestrian trail is located approximately 10 feet above the site and therefore the screening along the southern bike and pedestrian includes several shrubs and trees Figure 10: Truck Trailer Parking Location
Access
The applicant provided a Traffic Signal Feasibility Study, Attachment 4, for the proposed new traffic signal on Zinfandel Drive.

The proposed project includes access driveways as follows; • The Zinfandel Drive northern driveway and middle driveway will be right-in and right-out driveways.
• The Zinfandel southern driveway includes a new traffic signal that will provide an all access driveway (left turns and right turns).
• The existing bike trail will be relocated to the south side of the new driveway. The existing pedestrian signal will be removed and the pedestrian and bike crossing will be combined with the new signal.
• The Emergency Vehicle Access driveway on Baroque Drive will include an electronic gate and will be utilized by emergency vehicles only. The California Fire Code requires that access to the site is provided at several site specific locations.

Existing Masonry Wall
Screening: Solid
Fence and
Landscaping
Trailer Parking

Page 408 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 11 of 19
Sidewalk along Zinfandel Drive will be constructed along with pedestrian connections to the existing bike trail on Baroque Drive. Figure 11: Access Driveway Locations Figure 11: Access Driveway Locations
Traffic Signal Feasibility Study
The Traffic Signal Feasibility Study for the new signal on Zinfandel Drive, conclusions stated the following:

1. The addition of signalized access for the Stonecreek Industrial Center reduces overall delay at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection. However, all study intersections are projected to satisfy the City’s LOS D minimum standard under either access alternative.

2. The addition of a signalized access reduces the volume of traffic using the southbound left turn lane at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection. The morning peak hour queue in that lane which is projected to exceed the available storage without the signal would be contained in the available lane with the signaled access.

New Signal
Location with Bike
and Pedestrian
Crossing
EVA Driveway
Right in Right
Out Driveways

Page 409 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 12 of 19

3. Adding a new signalized access would reduce the overall travel speed on Zinfandel Drive from Douglas Road to the new access, but the difference in the overall average speed from Douglas Road to International Drive is only one mph.

4. The new crossing could increase the distance traveled by pedestrians and cyclists along the trail by about 200 feet.

5. The new crossing would increase the possibility of conflicts between pedestrian – cyclists and automobiles – trucks that do not exist today. This issue can be addressed in the final design of the access intersection, however, by designing the signal to place pedestrians and vehicles leaving the project by turning left in separate signal phases, by widening the intersection as necessary to ensure that trucks turning requirements do not encroach into opposing driveway lanes or into the Class II bike lanes along Zinfandel Drive. Wide landings, consistent with the current crossing layout would also be needed at the new intersection corners.

6. Because the trail approaches Zinfandel Drive at a 90-degree angle, the current crossing layout provides bicyclists with a view up and down Zinfandel Drive as the approach the street. Bicyclists can identify a gap in automobile traffic and cross without using the signal, as was observed. The introduction of turns on the trail at the new intersection could require arriving bicyclists to stop to determine the availability of gaps in traffic.

7. Limiting Baroque Drive access to “emergency vehicles only” would divert roughly 1,865 daily project trips from Baroque Drive to other access locations.

8. The new signalized access will allow the site to be designed to focus truck traffic (i.e., 152 to 362 daily trips) away from Baroque Drive.

Trip Generation Analysis:

The Villages of Zinfandel Specific Plan Area Environmental Impact Report (EIR) included a traffic study that assumed the transportation impacts of the plan area including the subject light industrial site on the City roadway network. To ensure conformance with the plan area EIR, a trip generation analysis was completed by KD Anderson & Associates for the approved Stonecreek Industrial Center. Trips were differentiated between passenger cars and large delivery trucks and the analysis demonstrated that the proposed project will generate less trips than assumed in the original specific plan EIR. The proposed Stonecreek Industrial Center is projected to generate 2,986 daily trips with 421 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 409 trips in the p.m. peak hour. Trucks will comprise a share of the project trips. Trucks would comprise different and generally lower shares of the project’s traffic during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour commute hours as employee commute trips would be the primary component at that time.

Parking
Consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and ZSPA the proposed project parking complies with the required parking for light industrial warehouse and office use. The parking requirement for the proposed uses are 500 parking stalls. The site plan includes 605 parking stalls. The parking spaces are evenly distributed throughout the site. 50 bike racks are provided with 25 long-term bike storage cabinets on site. Staff states that internal bike rooms are preferred rather than the long-term bike cabinets. However, the site plan shows where the long term cabinets would be located if internal bike storage rooms are not utilized. Additional landscaping buffer is provided between the building parking area and the adjacent bike trail. The project includes a shared parking agreement condition of approval.

Page 410 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 13 of 19
Bike and Pedestrian Trail Connections
The proposed project provides the following pedestrian and bike trail connections Figure 12:

New Pedestrian and Bike Trail Connections as follows:
• Yellow Line: New sidewalk built along Zinfandel Drive that will provide connection from the existing northern and southern pedestrian and bike trail. • Orange Line: Several connections from the site to the existing pedestrian and bike trail.

Figure 12: New Pedestrian and Bike Trail Connections
The immediate area to the project site includes existing Class I and Class II Bike Trails. Figure 13: Vicinity Bike Trail Map. The addition of the sidewalk with connections will complete a loop around the project site of approximately 1.22 miles.

Page 411 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 14 of 19
Figure 13: Vicinity Bike Trail Map
Architectural Design
The proposed project includes one-story buildings that are designed for warehouse and office accessory uses. Figure 14: Building Elevations and Figure 15: Building Perspectives. The proposed buildings have a consistent architectural style and theme building design. The buildings include a variety of materials and colors that are consistent with the surrounding area (light and dark tones with an accent color, different texture paneling to include wood texture).

Figure 16: Building Material. The loading dock areas are internal to the site.

Project
Site

Page 412 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 15 of 19
Figure 14: Building Elevations
Figure 15: Building Perspectives
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Side Elevations
Corner Elevation
Soundwall along Zinfandel Driveway

Page 413 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 16 of 19

Page 414 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 17 of 19
Figure 16: Building Materials
Consistent with the Villages of Zinfandel Design Guidelines and the City of Rancho Cordova Design Guidelines the proposed project includes the following architecture design:
• The project buildings provide quality building design consisting of durable and maintainable materials.
• The design of the building is consistent with the context of the area. • Building materials include concrete walls with integrated window and doors systems. The composition of materials results in a clean, attractive appearance. • Blank walls that face public streets are avoided with changes in wall depth, inset windows and doors, significant percentage of windows on facades facing the street and architecture elements to provide visual interest. • Site buildings have a consistent architectural style and theme. Buildings that are visible from the public streets are designed to a higher level of detail. • The buildings include varied roof parapets. A horizontal roof element is provided at the building entries to provide weather protection and scale down the building at this location. The design of the façade, through the use of windows and decorative breaks in the concrete walls helps break-down long and high walls into a more human scale

Page 415 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 18 of 19
• The site and building design are compatible with adjacent residential development. The site is located within the Villages of Zinfandel SPA and is close to residential and commercial areas within this development. The site and building design, materials, and colors fit in with the neighborhood.

Landscape Plan
The proposed landscape plan includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover that provides the required shade area and enhances the appearance of the site. Figure 17:

Landscape Plan. Accent landscaping has been provided at key project entries. Additional landscaping is provided along the area between the parking and bike trail on Baroque Drive to provide a natural buffer between the open space/bike trail and residential subdivision. The sound screen wing walls, front and side elevations of the buildings include trellises with vines for a vertical landscape element. A line of trees are provided along the southern property that is adjacent to the bike trail. The overall plan is consistent with the City Zoning Ordinance and the Villages of Zinfandel SPA.

Figure 17: Landscape Plan
Lighting Plan
The proposed lighting plan includes parking lot and building lighting. The applicant has provided a photometric lighting plan that is consistent with the City of Rancho Cordova Zoning Ordinance 23.725 Outdoor Lighting to include shields to direct lighting downward.

Utilities
The proposed project will utilize and extend existing water, sewer and electrical infrastructure.

Noise Study
The applicant provided a noise study, completed by Bollard Acoustical Consultants, that analyzed noise impacts associated with the potential uses to include traffic and truck traffic.

Attachment 5: Noise Analysis. The Noise Analysis included the site plan, potential uses for the

Page 416 of 1542 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 19 of 19
site, and the traffic analysis, completed by KD Anderson & Associates to complete the study.

The study concluded that based on the analysis and results, noise levels associated with project generated off-site traffic and on-site operations at the proposed Stonecreek Industrial Park are expected to satisfy the applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise criteria at the nearest existing residential uses. As a result, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for the project.

Neighborhood Meeting
The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on October 26, 2021. The applicant provided a report on the meeting. Attachment 6: Neighborhood Meeting Report.

FISCAL ANALYSIS OF PROJECT
The City anticipates that this project will provide additional revenues from temporary construction jobs, and permanent employment.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project applicant is requesting approval of a Major Design Review for the proposed project.

Under CEQA, the City lacks the discretion under the Major Design Review approval process to consider environmental effects not related to the design of the Project, including, but not limited to human health impacts from toxic air contaminants, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts of biological resources.

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) Section 15183, consistent with Community Plan, General Plan and Zoning. In addition the project will comply with the Villages of Zinfandel mitigation monitoring plan. A description of the evidence for the exemption is found in the findings included in Attachment 1. The proposed project included a noise study and biological resource review. Appropriate conditions of approval are included to minimize any impacts for noise and biological resources to include surveys prior to grading the site.

RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council find the project as follows ro be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and adopt the Resolution approving the Major Design Amendment Review for Stonecreek Industrial Center PLND-1121-0020, subject to the findings, (Attachment 2) Project Plans and (Attachment 3) Conditions of Approval.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Project Plans

3. Exhibit B to the Resolution - Conditions of Approval

4. Signal Feasibility Study

5. Noise Study

6. Neighborhood Meeting Report

7. 500’ Radius Map with Mailing Labels

8. PowerPoint Presentation

Page 417 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL CENTER PROJECT NO. PLND-1121-0020 WHEREAS, Dermody Properties (hereinafter referred to as Applicant) filed an application with the City of Rancho Cordova for a Major Design Review Amendment approval for the Stonecreek Industrial Center Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the appropriate authority to hear and take action on this project; and
WHEREAS, the project site located is within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area. The proposed project includes total of 602,004 square feet of light industrial buildings to include parking, lighting, and landscaping; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova has conducted a properly noticed public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented during the hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The proposed project is exempt from CEQA under Guidelines Section 15183: (Consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan, and Zoning Code). The following evidence supports the CEQA exemption.

A. Finding: The project has been analyzed and is exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15183 “Consistent with Community Plan, General Plan, and Zoning Evidence: The project applicant is requesting approval of a Major Design Review for the proposed project. Under CEQA, the City lacks the discretion under the Major Design Review approval process to consider environmental effects not related to the design of the Project, including, but not limited to human health impacts from toxic air contaminants, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts of biological resources. The proposed project site location is within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area.

A Final Environmental Impact Report was certified for the Special Planning Area in 1998 by Sacramento County and a Mitigation Monitoring Program was adopted. In addition, development of the project site is consistent with the Villages of Zinfandel EIR and was analyzed in the 2006 General Plan EIR. The proposed project includes light industrial buildings totaling 602,004 square-feet, to include parking, lighting, and landscaping. The proposed project is consistent with the Community Plan, General Plan, and Zoning.

2. To approve the Design Review, subject to the Major Design Review Package (Exhibit A) and the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B) as modified; supported by the following Findings and Evidence, as required by Zoning Code Section 23.141.070:

Page 418 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 3
A. Finding: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, complies with applicable zoning regulations, Specific Plan provisions, and special planning area provisions, and is consistent with the applicable Rancho Cordova design guidelines.

Evidence: The proposed project is consistent with the purpose and intent of adopted policies and regulations, including the General Plan, Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area designation, Zoning Code, and City and Villages of Zinfandel SPA development standards and design guidelines as well as the height limits within the Mather Airport Land Use Plan.

The use is permitted within the light industrial district and the Mather Airport Land Use Plan.

B. Finding: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The proposed site design includes a total of 602,004 square-feet of light industrial warehouse with office accessory buildings, with parking area, lighting, and landscaping.

The building elevations visible from public streets are designed with windows, a variety of materials, textures, and massing which provides a human scale and interest to the buildings.

A horizontal roof element is provided at the building entries to provide weather protection and scale down the building at this location. The design of the façade, through the use of windows and decorative breaks and landscape trellis along the concrete walls helps breakdown long and high walls into a more human scale. The building architecture, use of color, and material are consistent with the surrounding area, Villages of Zinfandel SPA, and City Design Guidelines.

C. Finding: The architecture, including the character, scale, and quality of the design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements, establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of existing or anticipated buildings on adjoining and nearby properties.

Evidence: The proposed buildings have a consistent architectural style and theme. Building elevations that are visible from the public streets are designed to a higher level of detail.

The design, color, and materials have been designed to integrate and compliment the surrounding approved buildings. The site and building design are compatible with adjacent residential development and light industrial areas. The site and building design are fit in with the surrounding area. The combination of building materials, forms and architectural elements provide visual relief to the facades. The façades have an acceptable level of articulation with building off-sets at entrances and horizontal details above doorways. The site and landscape plan meet the design requirements. The landscape plan includes canopy trees to provide for the required parking lot shading. Additional landscaping is provided to add visual interest and color in well-designed compositions. Pedestrian walkways and connections to the existing bike/pedestrian are provided to help integrate the project with the surrounding neighborhood and to encourage non-vehicular trips to the site.

D. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.

Evidence: The proposed project anticipated traffic is consistent with the Villages of Zinfandel Specific Plan Area Environmental Impact Report (EIR) traffic study that assumed the transportation impacts of the plan area including the subject light industrial site on the City

Page 419 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 3
roadway network. The proposed EVA driveway on Baroque Drive bisects the existing pedestrian/bike trail and therefore the project includes a condition of approval for appropriate signs for safe crossings at the driveway. The pedestrian sidewalk on Zinfandel Drive will connect the north and south existing pedestrian/bike trail. Bike racks and bike long term storage/ and inside bike storage areas that may be provided within the building are consistent with the Zoning Code bike storage requirements. The pedestrian connections to the existing bike/pedestrian trail are provided to help integrate the project with the surrounding neighborhood and to encourage non-vehicular trips to the site.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 18th day of April 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 420 of 1542 ends

project number : scale : stamp
drawn by :checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 2 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 3RD SUBMITTAL 03-07-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A00.1 COVER SHEET P:530-662-1755 F:530-662-4602 CIVIL ENGINEER: LAUGENOUR and MEIKLE P.O. BOX 828 WOODLAND, CA 95776 BRYAN BONINO [email protected] VICINITY MAP: PROJECT TEAM: OWNER DERMODY PROPERTIES RENO, NEVADA 89502 GEORGE CONDON [email protected] JEFF LEONHARDT, SACRAMENTO, CA 95811 1718 3RD STREET, SUITE 101 RMW ARCHITECTURE & INTERIORS ARCHITECT: P: 916-956-0033 P:916-449-1400 x405 [email protected] [email protected] JEFF AMBROSIA AUBURN, CA 95603 1223 HIGH ST. YAMASAKI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER P: 530-885-0040 500 EQUITY AVENUE PROJECT ARCHITECT & A00.1 * COVER SHEET A00.2 * PROJECT RENDERINGS A00.3 * PHASING PLAN A01.0 * PRELIMINARY MASTER SITE PLAN A01.1 * ENLARGED SITE PLAN - A A01.2 * ENLARGED SITE PLAN - B A01.3 * ENLARGED SITE PLAN - C A01.4 * ENLARGED SITE PLAN - D A01.5 SITE DETAILS A01.6 * SITE DETAILS A03.1 * EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - A & B A03.2 * EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - C A03.3 * EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - D A04.1 * LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM C201 CIVIL SITE PLAN C301 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C302 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C303 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C304 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C401 UTILITIES PLAN C402 UTILITIES PLAN C403 UTILITIES PLAN C404 UTILITIES PLAN C801 CROSS SECTIONS C802 CROSS SECTIONS C901 FIRE PLAN L1* LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 PLANTING PLAN A L1.2 PLANTING PLAN B L1.3 PLANTING PLAN C L1.4 PLANTING PLAN D L1.5 PLANT SCHEDULE AND NOTES E1.1 OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.2 BUILDING A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.3 BUILDING B PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.4 BUILDING C PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.5 BUILDING D PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.6 LIGHTING CUT SHEETS * DENOTES A SHEET TO BE PRINTED IN FULL COLOR SHEET INDEX: PERSPECTIVE IMAGE OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS LOCATION PROJECT PROJECT DESIGNER ASLA, CLIA, LEED AP PLANNING SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS FOR: STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH EAST CORNER OF BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE RANCHO CORDOVA, CA Site: The project site is located on the north east side of Zinfandel Drive and North Baroque, in the City of Rancho Cordova, California. The 41± acre site is currently undeveloped. Building: The project plan proposes four industrial buildings totaling 602,004 square feet. The industrial buildings will be of Type VB construction, site cast, tilted concrete panels with a variety of architectural enhancements. The typical wall panels are to be enhanced with reveals and a textured elastomeric, multicolored coating system. The areas around the building entries are also enhanced with fluted and wood textured formliner, tinted glazing in aluminum frames and overhead steel-framed painted canopies. The placement of these enhancements is focused at those locations most visible from the public roadways. Site Access and Parking: There are three site entrance driveways proposed along Zinfandel Drive. The southernmost entrance proposes relocating the existing traffic light to serve this entry / exit. The center driveway will primarily serve semi traffic. The northernmost driveway will be for vehicle parking only. The site plan proposes a total of 832 vehicle parking stalls for employees and or customers. Signage: The proposed signage in this submittal includes is for reference only. Criteria for future tenant signage will be provided at a later and under a separate permit as required. Landscaping: The project will be fully landscaped using plants appropriate for and indigenous to the City of Rancho Cordova. Low water use plants will be used extensively, while moderate water use plants will be concentrated at accent points, such as driveways and building entries. For further landscaping design information, see "Design Notes" on the LP Preliminary Landscape Plan. Sustainable Materials & Construction Practices: The project will incorporate a variety of sustainable materials and construction practices to include the following: 1) A storm water pollution prevention plan to minimize contamination, erosion, and dust pollution during construction. 2) Storage and collection of recyclable materials. 3) Construction waste management. 4) Environmental tobacco smoke control. 5) Heat reflecting roof membranes. 6) Light pollution reduction. 7) Water efficient landscaping. 8) Water use reduction methods. 9) Low VOC emitting sealants, adhesives, coatings, floorings, and wood materials. 10) Roof structures designed to accommodate additional weight for roof-top photovoltaic electricity generation panel arrays. 11) California Green Building Code compliant electric vehicle charging stations at seven locations. 12) The project architect is a LEED accredited professional and will apply his knowledge of LEED techniques and practices to the project design and construction. PROJECT NARRATIVE: ZINFANDEL DRIVE N MATHER BLVD. BAROQUE DR. DERMODY PROPERTIES 1 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 421 of 1542 ends

A00.2

TYPICAL

BUILDING

RENDERINGS
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

AS NOTED
RDG 11-10-2021
JDL
A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021
1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022
issue : description : date :
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
1 PROJECT RENDERINGS
A: VIEW OF TYPICAL BUILDING MAIN CORNER ENTRY
B: VIEW OF TYPICAL BUILDING FRONT ELEVATION
C: VIEW OF TYPICAL BUILDING SECONDARY ENTRY
E: VIEW OF PROPOSED BUILDING ALONG ZINFANDEL
D: VIEW OF MONUMENT SIGN
F: VIEW FROM SOUTHERN BIKE PATH LOOKING NORTH
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 422 of 1542 ends

T T T T BAROQUE DRIVE ZINFANDEL DRIVE BAROQUE DRIVE T T T A 169,536 SQ. FT. 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 37 DOCK DOORS 2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS D 125,796 SQ. FT. 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 35 DOCK DOORS 2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS C 137,136 SQ. FT. 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 37 DOCK DOORS 2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS B 169,536 SQ. FT. 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 39 DOCK DOORS 2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS NO TRUCKS STOP ONLY VEHICLES EMERGENCY project number : scale : stampdrawn by :checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A00.3 CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN 1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PHASE 1 PHASE 2 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 423 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T T
T T

BAROQUE DRIVE

ZINFANDEL DRIVE

BAROQUE DRIVE
T
T T
A
169,536 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
37 DOCK DOORS
2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS
D
125,796 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
35 DOCK DOORS
2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS
C
137,136 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
37 DOCK DOORS
2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS
B
169,536 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
39 DOCK DOORS
2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS

NO TRUCKS
STOP
ONLY

VEHICLES

EMERGENCY

SITE CONCRETE LANDSCAPE AREA
BUILDING AREA ASPHALT AREA EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 9' X 10' OVERHEAD

DOCK LEVEL DOOR
12' X 14' OVERHEAD

GRADE LEVEL DOOR

NEW PARCEL LINE

FIRE DEPARTMENT
TURN RADIUS:

BUILDING A
1/A01.1

BUILDING B
1/A01.2

BUILDING D
1/A01.4

BUILDING C
1/A01.3
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

AS NOTED
RDG 11-10-2021
JDL
A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021
1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022
2 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS
3RD SUBMITTAL
03-07-2022
issue : description : date :
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
A01.0

PRELIMINARY

OVERALL

SITE PLAN
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

KEY PLAN OVERALL SITE STATISTICS

KEYNOTES

SITE LEGEND
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
1 1
2 2
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 424 of 1542 ends

T T
T T
A
169,536 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
37 DOCK DOORS
2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS
D

NO TRUCKS
STOP
ONLY

VEHICLES

EMERGENCY
T T
T T

ZINFANDEL DRIVE

BAROQUE DRIVE

SITE CONCRETE LANDSCAPE AREA

BUILDING AREA ASPHALT AREA FIRE DEPARTMENT
TURN RADIUS:

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 9' X 10' OVERHEAD

DOCK LEVEL DOOR
12' X 14' OVERHEAD

GRADE LEVEL DOOR

NEW PARCEL LINE

BUILDING A
APN: 072-2860-002
ZONING: LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (ZSPA)
SITE AREA: 465,092.69 G.S.F. = 10.68 ACRES
BUILDING AREA: 169,536 G.S.F.

F.A.R.: 36.45%
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III OR V-B
BUILDING HEIGHT 48'-0"
NUMBER OF STORIES: 1
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:

WAREHOUSE: (85% ASSUMED) 81 (169,536 * 85% = 161,059 @ 0.5 / 1,000 S.F.) OFFICE: (15% ASSUMED) 69 (169,536 * 15% = 25,430 S.F. @2.7 / 1,000) BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA ZONING 23.719.110 :

SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 15 (10% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 8 (5% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 150
TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED:

STANDARD STALLS: 9'X19' (17' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 131
COMPACT STALLS: 8'X16' (14' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 48 (25% MAX OF TOTAL PARKING ALLOWABLE = 53) ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 8 (7 TOTAL ADA STALLS REQ'D PER 2019 CBC 11B.208.2) REQUIRED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIR VEHICLES PER 2019 CGBC TABLE 5.106.5.2 AND TABLE 5.106.5.3.3:

EV CHARGING STALLS: 13 (6% OF TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 211 * 0.06 = 13) STANDARD EV STALLS: 11
VAN ACCESSIBLE EV STALLS: 1
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 1
CLEAR AIR VEHICLES (CARPOOL / VANPOOL): 4 (17 TOTAL CLEAN AIR - 13 REQ'D EV = 4 ) TOTAL CLEAR AIR VEHICLES: 17 (8% OF TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 211 * 0.08 = 17 ) SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 16 (8 RACKS PROVIDED, 2 BIKES EACH) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 8 (FINAL AMOUNT TBD @ TIME OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 204
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
A01.1

ENLARGED

SITE PLAN

BUILDING A
KEYNOTES:

SITE INFORMATION / STATISTICS:

SITE LEGEND
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
1 A04.1
ELEVATION REFERENCE:

DETAIL NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
D
A03.1
C
A03.1
A
A03.1
B
A03.1
1 A04.1
ELEVATION REFERENCE:

DETAIL NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 A01.6
3 A01.6
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2
1 2
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 425 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T T
T T
T T
C
137,136 SQ. FT.

B
169,536 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
39 DOCK DOORS
2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS

NO TRUCKS

FIRE DEPARTMENT
TURN RADIUS:

BUILDING B
APN: 072-2860-002
ZONING: LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (ZSPA)
SITE AREA: 487,313.19 G.S.F. = 11.19 ACRES
BUILDING AREA: 169,536 G.S.F.

F.A.R.: 34.79%
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III OR V-B
BUILDING HEIGHT 48'-0"
NUMBER OF STORIES: 1
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:

WAREHOUSE: (85% ASSUMED) 81 (169,536 * 85% = 161,059 @ 0.5 / 1,000 S.F.) OFFICE: (15% ASSUMED) 69 (169,536 * 15% = 25,430 S.F. @2.7 / 1,000 BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA ZONING 23.719.110 :

SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 15 (10% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 8 (5% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 150
TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED:

STANDARD STALLS: 9'X19' (17' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 94
COMPACT STALLS: 8'X16' (14' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 2 (25% MAX OF TOTAL PARKING ALLOWABLE = 28) ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 6 (5 TOTAL ADA STALLS REQ'D PER 2019 CBC 11B.208.2) REQUIRED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIR VEHICLES PER 2019 CGBC TABLE 5.106.5.2 AND TABLE 5.106.5.3.3:

EV CHARGING STALLS: 7
STANDARD EV STALLS: 5
VAN ACCESSIBLE EV STALLS: 1
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 1
CLEAR AIR VEHICLES (CARPOOL / VANPOOL): 4 ( 11 TOTAL CLEAN AIR - 7 REQ'D EV = 4 ) TOTAL CLEAR AIR VEHICLES: 11
SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 14 (7 RACKS PROVIDED, 2 BIKES EACH) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 8 (FINAL AMOUNT TBD @ TIME OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 113

SITE CONCRETE LANDSCAPE AREA
BUILDING AREA ASPHALT AREA EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 9' X 10' OVERHEAD

DOCK LEVEL DOOR
12' X 14' OVERHEAD

GRADE LEVEL DOOR

NEW PARCEL LINE
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
A01.2

ENLARGED

SITE PLAN

BUILDING B
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
SITE INFORMATION / STATISTICS:

SITE LEGEND
KEYNOTES:
1 A03.1
ELEVATION REFERENCE:

DETAIL NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
D
A03.1
A
A03.1
B
A03.1
C
A03.1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 2
2 2
1 2
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 426 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS TT C 137,136 SQ. FT. 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 37 DOCK DOORS 2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS NO TRUCKSSITE CONCRETE LANDSCAPE AREA BUILDING AREA ASPHALT AREA EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 9' X 10' OVERHEAD DOCK LEVEL DOOR 12' X 14' OVERHEAD GRADE LEVEL DOOR NEW PARCEL LINE FIRE DEPARTMENT TURN RADIUS: BUILDING C APN: 072-2860-002 ZONING: LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (ZSPA) SITE AREA: 432,037.76 G.S.F. = 9.92 ACRES BUILDING AREA: 137,136 G.S.F. F.A.R.: 31.74% CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III OR V-B BUILDING HEIGHT 48'-0" NUMBER OF STORIES: 1 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: WAREHOUSE: (85% ASSUMED) 58 (137,136 * 85% = 116,565 @ 0.5 / 1,000 S.F.) OFFICE: (15% ASSUMED) 56 (137,136 * 15% = 20,571 S.F. @2.7 / 1,000) BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA ZONING 23.719.110 : SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 12 (10% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 6 (5% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 114 TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED: STANDARD STALLS: 9'X19' (17' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 90 COMPACT STALLS: 8'X16' (14' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 20 (25% MAX OF TOTAL PARKING ALLOWABLE = 34) ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 6 (6 TOTAL ADA STALLS REQ'D PER 2019 CBC 11B.208.2) REQUIRED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIR VEHICLES PER 2019 CGBC TABLE 5.106.5.2 AND TABLE 5.106.5.3.3: EV CHARGING STALLS: 7 STANDARD EV STALLS: 5 VAN ACCESSIBLE EV STALLS: 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 1 CLEAR AIR VEHICLES (CARPOOL / VANPOOL): 4 ( 16 TOTAL CLEAN AIR - 10 REQ'D EV CHARGING STALLS) = 6 TOTAL CLEAR AIR VEHICLES: 11 SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 12 (6 RACKS PROVIDED, 2 BIKES EACH) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS : 6 (FINAL AMOUNT TBD @ TIME OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 127 project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 2 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 3RD SUBMITTAL 03-07-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A01.3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN BUILDING C 1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SITE INFORMATION / STATISTICS: SITE LEGEND 1 A03.1 ELEVATION REFERENCE: DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CA03.2 DA03.2 AA03.2 BA03.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 427 of 1542 ends

DEL DRIVE T T T T D 125,796 SQ. FT. 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 35 DOCK DOORS 2 GRADE LEVEL DOORS NO TRUCKS T T T T SITE CONCRETE LANDSCAPE AREA BUILDING AREA ASPHALT AREA FIRE DEPARTMENT TURN RADIUS: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 9' X 10' OVERHEAD DOCK LEVEL DOOR 12' X 14' OVERHEAD GRADE LEVEL DOOR NEW PARCEL LINE BUILDING D APN: 072-2860-002 ZONING: LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (ZSPA) SITE AREA: 386,180.47 G.S.F. = 8.87 ACRES BUILDING AREA: 125,796 G.S.F. F.A.R.: 32.57% CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III OR V-B BUILDING HEIGHT 48'-0" NUMBER OF STORIES: 1 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: WAREHOUSE: (85% ASSUMED) 54 (125,796 * 85% = 106,927 @ 0.5 / 1,000 S.F.) OFFICE: (15% ASSUMED) 51 (125,796 * 15% = 18,869 S.F. @2.7 / 1,000) BICYCLE PARKING PER CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA ZONING 23.719.110 : SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 11 (10% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 5 (5% OF REQUIRED VEHICLE STALLS) TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 105 TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED: STANDARD STALLS: 9'X19' (17' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG)102 COMPACT STALLS: 8'X16' (14' W/ 2'-0" OVERHANG) 36 (25% MAX OF TOTAL PARKING ALLOWABLE = 40) ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 6 (6 TOTAL ADA STALLS REQ'D PER 2019 CBC 11B.208.2) REQUIRED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIR VEHICLES PER 2019 CGBC TABLE 5.106.5.2 AND TABLE 5.106.5.3.3: EV CHARGING STALLS: 13 (6% OF TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 211 * 0.06 = 13) STANDARD EV STALLS: 16 VAN ACCESSIBLE EV STALLS: 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 1 CLEAR AIR VEHICLES (CARPOOL / VANPOOL): 4 ( 19 TOTAL CLEAN AIR - 14 REQ'D EV = 5 ) TOTAL CLEAR AIR VEHICLES: 17 (8% OF TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 211 * 0.08 = 17 ) SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING STALLS: 12 (6 RACKS PROVIDED, 2 BIKES EACH) LONG TERM BICYCLE STALLS: 8 (FINAL AMOUNT TBD @ TIME OF TENANT IMPROVEMENT) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 161 project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 2 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 3RD SUBMITTAL 03-07-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A01.4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN BUILDING D KEYNOTES: SITE INFORMATION / STATISTICS: 1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SITE LEGEND 1 A03.1 ELEVATION REFERENCE: DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CA03.3 DA03.3 A A03.3 BA03.3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 428 of 1542 ends

A01.5

SITE DETAILS
2 DUMPSTER ELEVATIONS

FRONT ELEVATION

SIDE ELEVATION
1 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN
DDD
3 TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION
4 CANE BOLT SECTION
5 SIDE BOLT ELEVATION AT HEAD
6 HINGE ELEVATION, TYP.
7 GATE JAMB

WARNING DOMES AT SITE RAMPS
9 TYPICAL RAMP DETAIL
12 DOUBLE ACCESSIBLE STALLS
VAN
MINIMUM FINE $250
11 SIGN AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS
13 ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS

INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY
COLOR: WHITE
3'-0" WIDE MIN 3'-0" HIGH MIN
BLUE BACKGROUND COLOR SHALL APPROXIMATE FS 15090
IN FEDERAL STANDARD 595C.

NOTES:

1. THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY AND ITS BACKGROUND SHALL HAVE A NON-GLARE FINISH.

2. CHECK W/ THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION FOR REQUIREMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN IN THIS DETAIL.
14 BIKE RACK - INVERTED U STYLE
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
15 3~
7~
17 BICYCLE LOCKER - DOUBLE

WALKWAY PER

SITE PLAN

1. GRIND WELDS SMOOTH, TYP.

2. PAIINT EXPOSED STL, TYP U.O.N.

NOTE:
1 1/2" OD PAINTED STL TUBE HOR. /

VERT RAILING, TYP
1 1/2" OD PAINTED STL TUBE POST, THICKNESS
& SPACING AS REQ'D SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS

FOR APPROVAL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
CBC 1607A.8.1 REQUIRED DESIGN LOADS.

GUARDRAIL

CURB AS OCCURS, FIELD VERIFY HEIGHT AND
WIDTH. SEE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR
DETAILS AND MORE INFORMATION.

NOTE: DESIGN SHOWN IS FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE PER 2013 CBC 1013.1.

SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS

FOR FOOTING AND CONNECTION DETAIL

GUARDRAIL SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR
50 plf X 6'-0" POST SPACING = 300 lbs.

M = 300 lbs x 42" = 12,600 lb-in.
18 8
FIXED NON-REMOVABLE BOLLARD 10
1 19

NOT USED
20 STAMPED CONCRETE DETAIL

BUTTERFIELD COLOR
CONCRETE COLOR: UCP U20 SMOKE
TEXTURE SKIN: NEW BRICK SOLDIER COURSE STACKED BST6901 2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 429 of 1542 ends

3761

ZINFANDEL DRIVE

STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK

STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK
A01.6

SITE DETAILS
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
2 ADDRESS POST SIGN
1 MONUMENT SIGN DETAIL AND RENDERING (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) 3 SOUND WALL DETAIL
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 430 of 1542 ends

12.9 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A B C D E F F E D C B A FL1: CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH "FITZGERALD FORMLINERS" #14329 (3/4" DEEP WITH 4" RIBS) PAINT TO MATCH P4 P1: PAINT 1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7064 PASSIVE P2: PAINT 2 KELLY MOORE KMW43 WHITEST WHITE P3: PAINT 3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7670 GRAY SHINGLE P4: PAINT 4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7075 WEB GRAY GL1: DARK GRAY VISION GLAZ. VITRO GRAYLITE II GLASS 1/4" DUAL PANE GLAZING IN THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINUM FRAMES AL1: ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM P5: PAINT 5 BENJAMIN MOORE 2005-10 RED ROCK P6: PAINT 6 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7671 ON THE ROCKS FL2: CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH "FITZGERALD FORMLINERS" #16020 (WOOD PLANK TEXTURE) PAINT AS SPECIFIED 1 2 3 4 5 project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A03.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDINGS A & B 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FINISH LEGEND: P2 P5 P1 AL1 P2 P5 B: REAR ELEVATION D: RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION C: LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 2 ENLARGED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2- P1 P6 P3 P4 KEYNOTES: P6 P1 P3 P1 P6 FL1 P3 P4 P1 P6 P3 P2 P2 G1 P1 FL1 P6 FL2 P5 P4 A: FRONT ELEVATION P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P1 P4 FL2 P6 P2 P2 P2 P4 1 1 1 1 P4 1 1 P4 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 431 of 1542 ends

FL1: CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH "FITZGERALD FORMLINERS" #14329 (3/4" DEEP WITH 4" RIBS) PAINT TO MATCH P4 P1: PAINT 1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7064 PASSIVE P2: PAINT 2 KELLY MOORE KMW43 WHITEST WHITE P3: PAINT 3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7670 GRAY SHINGLE P4: PAINT 4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7075 WEB GRAY GL1: DARK GRAY VISION GLAZ. VITRO GRAYLITE II GLASS 1/4" DUAL PANE GLAZING IN THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINUM FRAMES AL1: ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM P5: PAINT 5 BENJAMIN MOORE 2005-10 RED ROCK P6: PAINT 6 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7671 ON THE ROCKS FL2: CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH "FITZGERALD FORMLINERS" #16020 (WOOD PLANK TEXTURE) PAINT AS SPECIFIED project number : scale : stamp drawn by :checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A03.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A: FRONT ELEVATION FINISH LEGEND:P2 P5 P1 AL1 P5 B: REAR ELEVATION D: RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION C: LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 2 ENLARGED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2- P1 P6 P3 P4 KEYNOTES: P1 P6 P3 P1 P4 FL2 FL1 P3 P1 P6 P3 P2 P6 P2 P2 G1 P1 FL1 P6 FL2 P5 P2 P4 P2 P4 1 1 1 P6 1 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 432 of 1542 ends

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E E D C B A FL1: CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH "FITZGERALD FORMLINERS" #14329 (3/4" DEEP WITH 4" RIBS) PAINT TO MATCH P4 P1: PAINT 1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7064 PASSIVE P2: PAINT 2 KELLY MOORE KMW43 WHITEST WHITE P3: PAINT 3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7670 GRAY SHINGLE P4: PAINT 4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7075 WEB GRAY GL1: DARK GRAY VISION GLAZ. VITRO GRAYLITE II GLASS 1/4" DUAL PANE GLAZING IN THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINUM FRAMES AL1: ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM P5: PAINT 5 BENJAMIN MOORE 2005-10 RED ROCK P6: PAINT 6 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7671 ON THE ROCKS FL2: CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH "FITZGERALD FORMLINERS" #16020 (WOOD PLANK TEXTURE) PAINT AS SPECIFIED 1 2 3 4 5 project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED RDG 11-10-2021 JDL A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 11-10-2021 1 PLND-1121-0020 PC COMMENTS 01-21-2022 issue : description : date : 1718 Third Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95811 RMW Architecture Interiors Office 916 449-1400 rmw.comOWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK A03.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING D 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A: FRONT ELEVATION FINISH LEGEND: P2 P5 P1 AL1 P2 P5 B: REAR ELEVATION D: RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION C: LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 2 ENLARGED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2- P1 P6 P3 P2 KEYNOTES: P1 P3 P6 P1 FL2 P4 P3 P1 P6 P2 P3 P6 P2 P2 G1 P2 P2 P1 FL1/P4 P6 FL2 P5 P4 P4 P4 P6 P2 1 1 1 1 P2 P4 FL1/P4 P2 P2 P5 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 433 of 1542 ends

BAROQUE DRIVE

ZINFANDEL DRIVE
A
169,536 SQ. FT.
36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT 36' INTERNAL CLR. HEIGHT
STOP
ONLY

VEHICLES EMERGENCY
13 12

ZINFANDEL
BAROQUE DR.

B A
BAROQUE DR.

B A
A04.1

LINE OF SIGHT

EXHIBIT
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
2 EX-1
3 EX-1
4 LINE OF SIGHT DETAIL @ BAROQUE DR. 3LINE OF SIGHT DETAIL @ ZINFANDEL DR. 2 LINE OF SIGHT DETAIL @ BAROQUE DR.
4 EX-1
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :
2214068.00

TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:
500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502

GEORGE CONDON
Partner, West Region
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE

SOUTH EAST CORNER OF

STONECREEK

INDUSTRIAL PARK
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 434 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T TT T
ONLY

VEHICLES

EMERGENCY STOP

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

RECORD DRAWINGS
© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E LM ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 435 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T TT T
ONLY

VEHICLES

EMERGENCY STOP

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

RECORD DRAWINGS
© L A U G E N O U R
A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R

A N D M E I K L E LM
ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 436 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T TT T

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

RECORD DRAWINGS
© L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L E G U A N O U R A N D M E I K L E LM ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 437 of 1542 ends

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 438 of 1542 ends

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 439 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T TT T
ONLY

VEHICLES EMERGENCY STOP

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

A N D M E I K L E
ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 440 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
T TT T

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

A N D M E I K L E
ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 441 of 1542 ends

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 442 of 1542 ends

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 443 of 1542 ends

LMLAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING ·

REDUCED PLOT RECORD DRAWINGS
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 444 of 1542 ends

LMLAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING ·

REDUCED PLOT RECORD DRAWINGS
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 445 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS T T T T ONLY VEHICLES EMERGENCY STOP LMLAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING · REDUCED PLOT RECORD DRAWINGS © L A U G E N O U R A N D M E I K L E © L A N E G U O U R A N D M E I K L E LM APPROVED BY:

SACRAMENTO METRO FIRE DATE
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 446 of 1542 ends

T T T T ZINFANDEL DRIVE

ZINFANDEL DRIVE
BAROQUE DRIVE BAROQUE DRIVE LANDSCAPE PLANL1 project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK 1223 HIGH STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603 (530) 885-0040 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Y A M A S A K I FAX (530) 885-0042 NORTH KEY MAP L1.1 L1.2 L1.4 L1.3 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 447 of 1542 ends

T T ZINFANDEL DRIVE project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK 1223 HIGH STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603 (530) 885-0040 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Y A M A S A K I FAX (530) 885-0042 0' 60' 30' 120' SCALE: 1"=30' NORTH KEY MAP L1.1 L1.2 L1.4 L1.3 PLANTING PLAN AL1.1 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 448 of 1542 ends

BAROQUE DRIVE project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK 1223 HIGH STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603 (530) 885-0040 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Y A M A S A K I FAX (530) 885-0042 0' 60' 30' 120' SCALE: 1"=30' NORTH KEY MAP L1.1 L1.2 L1.4 L1.3 PLANTING PLAN BL1.2 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 449 of 1542 ends

project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK 1223 HIGH STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603 (530) 885-0040 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Y A M A S A K I FAX (530) 885-0042 0' 60' 30' 120' SCALE: 1"=30' NORTH KEY MAP L1.1 L1.2 L1.4 L1.3 PLANTING PLAN CL1.3 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 450 of 1542 ends

T T
ZINFANDEL DRIVE project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK 1223 HIGH STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603 (530) 885-0040 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Y A M A S A K I FAX (530) 885-0042 0' 60' 30' 120' SCALE: 1"=30' NORTH KEY MAP L1.1 L1.2 L1.4 L1.3 PLANTING PLAN DL1.4 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 451 of 1542 ends

project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 2214068.00 AS NOTED A INITIAL PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK 1223 HIGH STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603 (530) 885-0040 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Y A M A S A K I FAX (530) 885-0042 KEY MAP L1.1 L1.2 L1.4 L1.3 PLANT SCHEDULE AND NOTES L1.5 ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 452 of 1542 ends

project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date : approved for the architect by : approved for the owner by : sheet no. : 22011 AS NOTED WVN XX-XX-XXXX WVN A 03-09-2022 issue : description : date : OWNER / DEVELOPER: TENANT'S DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: 500 Equity Avenue Reno, NV 89502 GEORGE CONDON Partner, West Region PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA BAROQUE DRIVE & ZINFANDEL DRIVE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK E1.1 OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ITEM 11.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 453 of 1542 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 454 of 1542 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 455 of 1542 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 456 of 1542 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 457 of 1542 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 458 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 1 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

1. The approved entitlement is for a Major Design Review Permit Amendment for a total of 602,004 square feet of light industrial buildings to include parking, lighting, and landscaping within Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area, as described in the City Council staff report dated April 18, 2022 and Exhibit A with the conditions herein, for Project No. PLND 1121-0020.

Project Description On-Going Planning

2. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.

General On-Going Planning

3. Any future alteration to the buildings, change in use, intensification of the site, or modification to the parking and landscaped area must be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with all local, state, and federal regulations. Minor modifications that are found to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans such as colors, plant materials, or minor lot line adjustments, may be approved administratively. Major modifications shall be approved by the applicable decision making body.

General On-Going Planning/
Building /Public
Works

4. Applicant/Developer shall not carry a negative account balance with the City for the processing of the project. If a negative account balance occurs, it will be the developer's responsibility to pay the balance due, in order to avoid delays in the processing of future permits or recordation of maps. Please email the Finance Department at [email protected] for the status of your account with the City.

General On-Going Finance

5. The Permit is valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of City Council approval unless an extension is granted by the Community Development Director.

Expiration On-Going Planning

6. The applicant shall comply with the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area Mitigation Monitoring Plan.

Environmental On-Going Planning/
Publics Works

Page 459 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 2 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

7. Signage is not approved with this permit. All signage shall comply with the City of Rancho Cordova Zoning Code.

Signage On-Going Planning

8. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, demolition, paving and/or grading of any real property must adhere to the development standards outlined within the City’s Noise Element, RCMC 6.68 and RCMC 16.18.1407(F).

Construction On-Going Planning/
Building/Code
Enforcement

9. Access to the bike trail and the crossing at Zinfandel Drive shall be maintained and open at all times during construction.

Trail Access On-Going Public Works

10. The trailer parking area in Phase 2, if installed, shall be screened with solid fencing and landscaping along Baroque Drive and evergreen landscaping along the bike trail.

Trailer Parking
Screening
On-Going Planning

11. There shall be no outside storage of goods area on the project site. Use On-Going Planning

12. Applicant shall be responsible for all damage to City streets associated with construction of the project and shall repair any damage as soon as possible.

Construction On-Going Public Works

13. The removal and replanting of landscape not listed on the approved plan set must be consistent with RCMC 23.716.080 through 23.716.090 and reviewed by the Planning Department prior to the removal. All landscape care, maintenance, and tree pruning must adhere to RCMC 23.716.100 through 23.716.110.

Landscaping On-Going Planning

14. All storm drain facilities within private lots shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as “private” in the improvement plans.

Infrastructure On-Going Public Works

15. The applicant shall record a map to 4 lots or less and complies with the development that is part of this approval.

Map Prior to approval of
grading plans
Public Works
Prior to Recordation of Final Maps

16. A note shall be placed on the final map stating that “Reciprocal access and parking between parcels shown hereon shall be granted/reserved prior to the sale and/or conveyance of said parcels.

Prior to Approval of
Final Map
Public Works

Page 460 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 3 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

17. Dedicate a 15 foot Pedestrian Easement contiguous to Zinfandel Drive right-of-way.

Easement Prior to Recording of
Final Parcel Map
Public Works

18. Permanent structures, walls, signs, and footings will not be permitted within the existing SASD easement area unless express written permission is obtained from SASD.

Easement Prior to Recording of
Final Map/Approval
of Improvement
Plans
SASD

19. Record a maintenance agreement involving all the parcels of the subject map assuring timely maintenance of the private utilities.

Infrastructure
Maintenance
Prior to Recording of
Final Parcel Map
Public Works

20. Provide Fire Access Agreement between all parcels connected to and served by fire access. Fire Access Agreement shall be recorded with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction.

Access Agreement Prior to Recording of
Final Parcel Map
Fire

21. Provide Fire Access Roadway Maintenance Agreement (RMA) between all parcels connected to and served by the fire access roadway. The Fire Access Roadway Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction. The roadway maintenance agreement shall include the following:
a) Provisions for the necessary repair and
maintenance of the roadway surface
b) Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway
and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height
of thirteen feet six inches (13’6”) or width of twenty
feet (20’)
c) Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or
replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage
or striping
d) Provisions for the necessary repair and
maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access
gates and opening systems
Maintenance
Agreement
Prior to Recording of
Final Parcel Map
Fire

Page 461 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 4 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans

22. Obtain an easement and right of entry from Cordova Recreation and Park District for the developer’s installation of a driveway and bike path spurs per the tentative map and the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works and CRPD. Ongoing maintenance of asphalt and concrete within the easement will be the responsibility of the Stonecreek Industrial Center owner(s).

Infrastructure Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
CRPD/
Public Works

23. Civil improvement plans shall not be approved by the City until a complete submittal for accompanying landscaping has been submitted.

Landscaping Plan Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

24. Incorporate full capture trash systems for all priority land use areas in accordance with the requirements in the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento region dated July 2018.

Infrastructure Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

25. Number, size, and location of driveways are subject to approval by the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

26. Applicant shall photo-document the condition of adjacent streets, sidewalks and infrastructure to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

27. Enter into a frontage agreement and bond for construction of public improvements per the approved Public Works plans to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Improvement Bond Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

28. A final landscape plan shall be submitted in conjunction with improvement plan and or building permit submittal and approved by the planning and public works departments prior to issuance of permits and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC

23.716.020. The final landscape planting and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered licensed landscape architect and include the following items per RCMC 22.180.060:
 Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
 Irrigation Plan
 Soils Test
 Water Use Calculations
 Irrigation Schedule
Landscaping Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

Page 462 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 5 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

29. The plans shall include a note that states “The contractor shall be responsible for repairing all damaged trail landscape and irrigation as a result of this project to an “as was” or better condition. The contractor shall coordinate all work on CRPD property with Construction Inspector.

Landscape and
irrigation around trail
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public
Works/CRPD

30. Applicant shall provide evidence of a recorded cross access and parking agreement with the adjacent property owners.

Easement Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

31. All new structures shall be protected from the 100-year (1 percent) flood event. Certified pad elevations (certified by a registered Civil Engineer or licensed Land Surveyor) shall be set at least one and two tenths foot (1.2') above all sources of 100-year flooding (see Section 9-1 of improvement standards). The overland release path must be shown on the plans and the hydraulic computation must be provided to estimate the flow depths along the overland release paths. The calculations must be in conformance with Section 9-15 Improvement Standards.

Flood Survey Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works

32. a. Each owner is responsible for installing collector sized sewer pipeline and appurtenances across the parcel
frontage as a condition of approval. These improvements must be shown on the plans.
b. To obtain sewer service, construction of SASD sewer
infrastructure will be required. Current SASD Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed
c. SASD requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SASD’s sewer
system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to Sewer Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
SASD and Public
Works

Page 463 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 6 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
a private onsite sewer line or a separate connection to the SASD public sewer line. These improvements must be
shown on the plans
d. Lower Laterals must not directly connect to main lines more than 19 feet deep / directly to trunk lines (lines with flow greater than 1 MGD).
e. Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured
horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.
f. The project has an approved Level 3 sewer study. Any changes to the approved study may require an addendum.

33. The applicant shall comply with the Fire conditions as follows; a. Show the design for a fire access roadway of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width, 13-feet, 6-inches of vertical clearance, and turning radii of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside dimension on the improvement plans. The access
roadway shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any proposed building. The use of turf-block or grass-crete or similar alternate road surfaces is not approved for installation in fire apparatus access roadways.
b. Show on the plans how Fire Lanes will be marked. Fire Lane identification shall be provided along the required fire access roadway. Fire Lane identification shall be in accordance with the Sacramento Metro Fire Districts Fire Prevention
Standard #3 and the California Vehicle Code. Vehicle
parking is prohibited on any street less than 28 feet in width.

Fire Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans
Sac Metro Fire
District/ Public
Works

Page 464 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 7 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Vehicle parking is permitted on both sides of streets 36 feet or more in width. Roadway widths shall be measured
between the gutter-line or edge of pavement on opposite sides of the road. Identification of fire apparatus access roadways may be required on private roads.
c. Provide a note on the plan that reads, “Fire access roadways shall be built to bear a minimum of 80,000 pounds and meet the Sacramento County Public Works Standards for
roadways. A report, prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer, verifying the ability of the road to bear the required minimum weight, shall be submitted with any plan indicating construction of roadway. Verification of constructed roadway shall be provided by a registered geotechnical engineer prior to final of the project.” Required Private streets and fire apparatus access roads shall be installed to the “first lift,” (Up to the last one inch of pavement) identified, and verified by SMFD prior to any construction, (including foundations) or on-site storage of combustible materials.
d. Show the location of the required fire hydrants for this project on the improvement plans. Approved fire hydrants capable of providing the required fire flow for the protection of any and all structures shall be located along the fire apparatus access roadway. The required fire hydrants shall be installed and operational prior to any construction, (including
foundations) or on-site storage of combustible materials.

The minimum required fire flow for the protection of
commercial developments is 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) at a pressure of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) for a twohour duration. Fire hydrant maximum spacing is 300 feet between hydrants.

34. Prior to any construction activity, a pre-construction determinate survey shall be required for work that will commence during the migratory bird nesting season (February 1 through August 31). This survey is to determine if there is active onsite nesting by birds Survey At Improvement
Plans/ grading
permit issuance.

Planning

Page 465 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 8 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) would be affected by construction activities. If all construction activity would occur outside this time, the survey is not required. If nesting activity is observed, consultation with the City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be conducted in order to determine the appropriate mitigation, if any, required to minimize impacts to nesting birds. No activity may occur within 100 feet of any nesting activity or as otherwise required following consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

35. Enter into a frontage agreement and bond for construction of public improvements per the approved Public Works plans to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Bond Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plan
Public Works

36. An approved traffic control and pedestrian routing plan is required prior any construction within City ROW.

Traffic and
pedestrian routing
plan
Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plan
Public Works
Prior to Approval of Building

37. Install improvements per the approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

38. The following roadway and intersection improvements shall be completed:
a) Install intersection improvements for a T-intersection at the southwest property boundary
b) Install a 3-way traffic signal for the T-intersection at the southwest property boundary
c) Realign bike trail with signal and intersection improvements d) Install a 325 foot turn pocket, or such length approved by Public Works Dept, with the installation of the 3-way traffic signal
e) Provide facilities to accommodate a bus stop on the eastside of Zinfandel Drive just north of the proposed site access signal, including but not limited to: bus turnout, bus pad, Intersection
Improvements
Prior to Issuance of
building permits
Public Works

Page 466 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 9 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center
April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
bench, shelter, etc. to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Other improvements as deemed necessary by the City for safe function of the development and roadway system.

39. All trash enclosures and refuse areas shall comply with zoning code regulations and all service provider standards regarding amount, design, and access based upon the project’s estimated need and waste pickup schedules. Trash enclosures should try to incorporate the same architectural treatments, materials and colors as the main building in order to properly screen them from view. The gate to the trash enclosure shall be an opaque metal gate.

Architectural Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning

40. Bicycle Parking shall be installed in accordance with RCMC

23.719.115. All parking shall be located near main entrances and not impede onsite automobile and pedestrian access. The final design and location will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.

Bicycle Parking Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning

41. A final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department in conjunction with improvement plan and or building permit submittal and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of permits and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC 23.716.020. The final landscape planting and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered licensed landscape architect and include the following items per RCMC 22.180.060:
• Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
• Irrigation Plan
• Soils Test
• Water Use Calculations
• Irrigation Schedule
Landscaping Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning

42. Vines with vertical trellises shall be incorporated along the front elevation and side elevations for buildings to the satisfaction of the Planning Department.

Landscaping Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Planning

43. SASD and the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District may require additional sewer impact fee payments in accordance with Sewer fee Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
SASD/Public Works

Page 467 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 10 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
each District’s Ordinance. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant should contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at 916-876- 6100 for sewer impact fee information.

44. Applicant shall contact and work with Rancho Cordova Police Dept. regarding lighting position, security cameras, and overall security of the site.

Lighting and
Security
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Police
Dept./Planning

45. Applicant shall complete improvement plans to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Improvement plans shall include, but shall not be limited to:
 All onsite civil improvements.
 Civil plan shall include an ADA access plan
 New street striping as necessary to accommodate
improvements.
 New 7’ detached sidewalks and frontage improvements along entire property frontage adjacent to Zinfandel Drive pursuant to city standards.
 New 7-foot detached sidewalk shall extend along Zinfandel Drive and connect to the existing sidewalk ramp located on the south side of Baroque Drive where it intersects with Zinfandel Drive. The 7-foot detached sidewalk shall then continue to the east to connect with the existing bike trail.
 All landscape strips, medians, etc that contain trees shall be installed with continuous root barriers.
 Three type A driveways on Zinfandel Drive per the approved tentative map and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
 A modified Type A driveway with ramps. Reroute the existing bike trail along Baroque Drive per the approved tentative map to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Install a stop sign at the driveway exit to Baroque Drive.
 Vehicular access to the site via Baroque Driveway shall not be permitted. Treatments shall include signage and striping to the Infrastructure Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

Page 468 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 11 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
satisfaction of the Public Works Department for this driveway for Emergency Access Only.
 Utility laterals
 Construct one paved connection from the proposed north side of the parking lot to the existing bike trail near the east end of the project in proposed Building B lot. Location and alignment of connections shall be to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
 All newly constructed bike paths shall be minimum 10-feet paved width with additional 2-feet of compacted decomposed granite shoulder on both sides.
 Public improvement plans shall clearly delineate all transitions to existing improvements.
 All improvements to be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
 A note shall be placed on the parcel map summarizing the required public improvements.

46. Designer shall certify that installed landscaping conforms to City water conservation landscape requirements.

Landscape Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
Public Works

47.  SMUD has existing underground 12kV facilities along Baroque Dr that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of
California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon
building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.
 Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre-engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.  Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the
Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD
Infrastructure Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
SMUD / Public
Works

Page 469 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 12 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD
performing work on the Applicant’s property.
 In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.
 SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its
easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any
damages to the developed property within said easement
that unreasonably interferes with those needs.
 The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate
trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).  In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the
Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and
appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.
 The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD
equipment, transformer location, service conductors).

Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be
found at: https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-andRebates/Design-and-Construction-Services.  The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways.  The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities

Page 470 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 13 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum
SMUD requirements for access roads.
 The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather
vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20- feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and
appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.
 The Applicant shall disclose existing or proposed 69 kV electrical facilities to future and/or potential owners along Folsom South Canal.

48. Install improvements per the approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Improvements Prior to Final
Building Inspection
Public Works

49. The applicant shall meet the following: Civil Site Plans and Architectural Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm plans shall be submitted prior to Final Building Permit being issued. Please note: The Sacramento Metro Fire District does not allow deferred submittals for Fire Sprinkler and/or Fire Alarm plans.

Fire Prior to Final
Building Inspection
Fire

50. During and upon completion of the installation of the landscaping for the project, the project landscape architect/designer shall certify that the installed landscape complies with the approved plans.

Certification shall be accomplished by completion of site visits at key installation milestones. Key milestones at a minimum shall include:
rough grade, soil amendment verification, Plant material inspection, irrigation coverage test and final installation. Certification shall include signed site observation reports, photographs and documentation verifying implementation of soil report
recommendations. Failure to submit complete and accurate documentation to the Planning Department will delay final approval/occupancy of the project.

Landscaping Prior to final building
inspection of the first
unit
Public Works

51. If gates are installed they shall be in accordance with Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers Standard. Plan submittal is required prior to installation.

Fire Prior to Final
Inspection/
Fire

Page 471 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 3
PLND 1121-0020 Conditions of Approval Exhibit B to the Resolution City Council Page 14 of 14 Stonecreek Industrial Center April 18, 2022 Major Design Review Amendment
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Certificate of
Occupancy

52. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new or existing buildings in such a position as to be easily read from the street or road fronting the property. The minimum size of the numbers shall not be less than six (6) inches and shall be mounted immediately adjacent to a light source and shall also contrast with their background.

Fire Prior to Final
Inspection/
Certificate of
Occupancy
Fire

53. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping, the designer shall certify that the landscape complies with all city water conserving landscape requirements. Certification shall be accomplished by completion of a certificate of compliance on a form approved by the director of the city public works department. Failure to submit a complete and accurate certificate of compliance will delay final approval of the project and/or discontinue water service per RCMC 22.180.090. Upon receipt of the certificate of compliance and site inspection from City staff, the landscaping performance bond will be released.

Landscaping Prior to Final
Inspection/
Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning/ Public
Works

54. As-built reproducible grading and improvement plans (1 full size and 1 half size hard copy), as well as a compact disc containing said plans in AutoCAD and pdf format, and a GIS shape file, or equivalent to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Department.

Plans Prior to final building
inspection
Public Works

Page 472 of 1542 ends

January 21, 2022
Mr. George Condon
Dermody
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
RE: STONECREEK INDUSTRIAL CENTER TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEASIBILITY, RANCHO

CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Condon:

Thank you for contacting our firm regarding the feasibility of signalized access to the Stonecreek Industrial Center in Rancho Cordova. As we understand, the Stonecreek Industrial Center project, approved by the City of Rancho Cordova in 2019 (file DD9800) involves roughly 600,000 sf of light industrial uses located off of Zinfandel Drive at Baroque Drive. Per the original site layout, as approved by the City in 2019, the project’s access is focused on Baroque Drive, and its Zinfandel Drive access is limited to two right-turn-only driveways. You have proposed to modify the site layout to add a new signalized full access intersection on Zinfandel Drive. The access would be at the south end of the project immediately north of the existing signalized trail crossing which would be relocated to the south side of the new driveway intersection. Your proposed site layout also limits access to Baroque Drive driveway to emergency vehicles only. Non-emergency automobile and truck traffic will be excluded from the Baroque Drive driveway and will be directed to the Zinfandel Drive driveways, thus reducing traffic on Baroque Drive.

Background Information
Project Characteristics. The Stonecreek Industrial Center project is located regionally in Figure 1, while the approved project site plan is presented as Figure 2. That plan included two right-turn-only driveways on Zinfandel Drive south of Baroque Drive and a full access on Baroque Drive at Tinta Fina Drive. The Stonecreek Community bike trail runs along the south side of the property, and a signalized crossing exists on Zinfandel Drive. Under the proposed access scenario shown in Figure 3, a new full access intersection would be created on Zinfandel Drive roughly 100 feet to the north of the trail crossing, and the trail would be redirected along Zinfandel Drive to that location. Two right-turn-only driveways would also be provided on Zinfandel Drive and access to Baroque Drive would remain, although it would be limited to emergency vehicles only.

Analysis Approach. Because Stonecreek Industrial Center is an approved project, the analysis is intended to consider whether the change in project access is likely to result in any appreciable change to traffic operating conditions in this area of Rancho Cordova. To address this question traffic operations have been assessed under current and long term future conditions in terms of:
• Intersection Level of Service at key locations
• Average travel speeds along Zinfandel Drive
• Effects on Trail Users
• Queuing at key intersections
• Automobile and truck traffic volumes on Baroque Drive ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 473 of 1542 ends

Our analysis has made use of available traffic data and new traffic volume counts to create “existing” conditions data for four study area intersections during typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours when area schools are in session under “pre-COVID” conditions. Current use of the Zinfandel Drive trail crossing signal was monitored on a weekday and weekend basis. The amount of vehicular traffic associated with the Stonecreek Industrial Center was estimated using trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and the regional distribution of site traffic was suggested based on current travel patterns. Project trips were then assigned into and out of the site via the project driveways under “approved” and “proposed” access scenarios. Intersection Levels of Service based on delay and 95th percentile queues as well as average travel speed on Zinfandel Drive were then determined with and without the project using procedures that are accepted by the City and that account for pedestrian / trail crossing activity. The adequacy of traffic operations was then determined by comparing resulting Levels of Service and 95th percentile queues to adopted minimum standards and turn lane storage. Long term conditions were forecast using information from previous traffic studies for the area and City traffic model Year 2055 projections, and conditions with and without the proposed access were again evaluated.

Current Traffic Conditions
Traffic Count Data. An a.m. (7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) peak hour traffic and pedestrian volume base was established for these study area intersections:

1. Zinfandel Drive / Bear Hollow Drive

2. Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive

3. Zinfandel Drive / Spoto Drive

4. Zinfandel Drive / Bike / Pedestrian Crossing
New traffic counts were collected at these locations on July 1, 2021. Because these count volumes would likely be affected by the effects of COVID-19 as well as local schools being closed for the summer it was necessary to adjust these volumes to non-Covid conditions. The adjustment was accomplished by also counting the adjoining Zinfandel Drive / International Drive intersection and comparing those results to Year 2016 traffic counts available from the City of Rancho Cordova. Adjustment factors based on northbound and southbound traffic south of International Drive were identified and applied to the Year 2021 counts made at other locations. Resulting “existing” traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4, and traffic count data and adjustment worksheet are included in the appendix to this report.

Zinfandel Drive / Trail Crossing Activity. The existing trail crossing on Zinfandel Drive was monitored to determine use of the existing traffic signal. The crossing was monitored from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Thursday July 1, 2021 and on Saturday July 3, 2021, and the results are included in the appendix.

Table 1 summarizes the observed data in terms of the number of times that the crossing signal was activated to stop traffic as well as the number of pedestrians and bicyclists who used the crossing. It is important to note that this data was collected during the summer when temperatures were high. As a result, it is likely that trail use is greater during more temperate months than was observed in July.

However, the collected data is useful for determining the effects of the existing crossing signal on Zinfandel Drive traffic flow. It is also worth noting that the tally of pedestrians and cyclists at the crossing included some users who crossed Zinfandel Drive without activating the traffic signal.

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 474 of 1542 ends

TABLE 1

ZINFANDEL DRIVE / STONECREEK COMMUNITY BIKE TRAIL CROSSING ACTIVITY Parameter
6:00 a.m. to
10:00 a.m.
10:00 a.m. to
2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m. to
8:00 p.m.

Total
Thur Sat Thur Sat Thur Sat Thur Sat
# traffic signal
activations1 14 16 11 8 6 5 31 29
Pedestrians 16 22 7 8 4 3 27 33
Cyclists 21 24 9 12 5 10 35 46
1 some pedestrians and cyclists crossed without activating the signal Operational Analysis. Tables 2 thru 4 present information regarding existing conditions based on intersection Level of Service, queuing and overall travel speed on Zinfandel Drive. Table 2 identities current intersection Levels of Service based on HCM based analysis using SYNCHRO software. As noted, all study intersections operate at LOS D or better. Assuming five signal activations per hour by cyclists and pedestrians, the existing trail crossing operates at LOS A with relatively little overall delay.

Table 3 identifies current peak period vehicle queues at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection based on SimTraffic microsimulation analysis. Simulation parameters suggested by the City of Rancho Cordova were employed (i.e., 30 minute seeding prior to peak hour and 3.5 second pedestrian crossing time. Ten distinct model runs were made, the outlying two runs were discarded and the average of the eight remaining runs was reported. The Synchro/SimTraffic software is intended to be a stochastic model (i.e., randomness is intentional when running the simulations). The results for each individual run will vary within each scenario and between scenarios, and this variation may result in some intersections having lower delays and/or shorter queues in the ‘Plus Project’ scenarios than in the ‘No Project’ scenarios. This is a normal occurrence for stochastic models, and it is not unexpected that delays or queues could improve at one intersection while increasing at other intersections. All 95th percentile queue can be accommodated by existing storage.

Table 4 identifies the average travel speeds along Zinfandel Drive from Douglas Road to International Drive. In each case the average sped reflects the combination of intersection approach delay and running time on the segment individual segments. After accounting for the effects of traffic signals, the average speed over this two-mile length of Zinfandel Drive ranges from 30 to 34 mph, which represent LOS C conditions under the thresholds contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). However, the average speeds on individual segments can be lower at locations where signal delay affects a short portion of Zinfandel Drive.

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 475 of 1542 ends

TABLE 2

EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
Intersection
Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Zinfandel Drive / Bear Hollow Drive Signal 14 B 13 B
Zinfandel Drive / Spoto Drive Signal 6 A 6 A
Zinfandel Dr / Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd Signal 13 B 13 B Zinfandel Dr / Stonecreek Community Bike
Trail Crossing
Signal 1 A 1 A
TABLE 3

EXISTING PEAK PERIOD QUEUES
Intersection Direction Lane Storage
(feet)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Volume
(veh/hr)
95th % Queue
(feet)
Volume
(vph)
95 th % Queue
(feet)
Zinfandel Dr / Baroque Dr /
Mather Blvd
NB Left 180 20 <25 45 <25
SB left 170 30 50 10 55
EB Left 160 50 55 15 30
WB All 7401 25 50 105 60
1 distance to Tinta Fina Drive intersection
TABLE 4

EXISTING ZINFANDEL DRIVE TRAVEL SPEEDS
Intersection Direction Distance
(miles)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Speed
(mph)
LOS
Speed
(mph) LOS
International Drive SB - - - - -
Bear Hollow Drive SB 0.26 20 E 21 D
Spoto Drive SB 0.32 34 C 32 B
Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd SB 0.37 28 C 24 D
Bike Trail Crossing SB 0.25 33 C 32 C
Douglas Road SB 0.82 43 A 40 B
Total SB 2.01 34 C 31 C
Douglas Road NB - - - - -
Bike Trail Crossing NB 0.82 51 A 52 A
Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd NB 0.25 20 E 20 E
Spoto Drive NB 0.37 38 B 34 C
Bear Hollow Drive NB 0.32 25 D 24 D
International Drive NB 0.26 18 E 16 E
Total NB 2.01 30 C 30 C
Free flow speed is 55 mph
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 476 of 1542 ends

Project Characteristics
The amount of vehicular traffic associated with the Stonecreek Industrial Center and its distribution to the study area street system has been identified based on trip generation rates published by the Institute for Transportation Engineers and distribution assumptions based on current travel patterns and consideration of the nature of the uses that would occupy the site.

Trip Generation. As noted in Table 5, trip generation rates are available for various types of industrial uses. The use with the highest rates (i.e., General Light Industrial) have been assumed. The project will include a limited amount of ancillary office space to support the industrial uses that is permitted under City of Rancho Cordova zoning. Typically, 5% to 10% of light industrial space may be used as office, and the trips associated with ancillary office use are included in the industrial trip generation rates. The Stonecreek Industrial Center is projected to generate 2,986 daily trips with 421 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 409 trips in the p.m. peak hour.

Trucks will comprise a share of the project trips, but actual shares will likely depend on the nature of individual users. Assuming the range of daily truck trip generation rates identified for various types of industrial uses, Stonecreek Industrial Center could generate 152 to 362 daily truck trips, with half being trips into the facility and half being outbound. This would represent roughly 5% to 12% of the daily trip generation estimate. Trucks would comprise different and generally lower shares of the project’s traffic during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour commute hours as employee commute trips would be the primary component at that time. This analysis assumed that trucks comprise 5% of the project traffic in the peak commute direction during each time period.

TABLE 5

TRIP GENERATION RATES AND FORECASTS
Code Descriptions Unit Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates
110
General Light Industrial ksf 4.96 88% 12% 0.70 13% 87% 0.63 Trucks only 0.25
130
Industrial Park ksf 3.37 81% 19% 0.40 21% 79% 0.40
Truck Only 0.57
140
Manufacturing ksf 3.93 77% 23% 0.62 31% 69% 0.67
Trucks Only 0.57
150 Warehousing ksf 1.74 77% 23% 0.17 27% 73% 0.19
Trucks only 0.60
154
High Cube Warehouse –
Transload and
Short term Storage
ksf 1.40 77% 23% 0.08 28% 72% 0.10
Truck only 0.22
Stonecreek Industrial Center Forecasts
110 Stonecreek Center – total 602.0 2,986 373 48 421 49 330 379 Stonecreek Center - Trucks 152 to 362
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 477 of 1542 ends

Trip Distribution. The directional distribution of project trips will likely reflect regional employee commute patterns and the locations of access to the regional highway system. As indicated in Table 6, this analysis assumes 70% of the project’s trips are oriented to the north. This distribution was assumed for both current and long-term conditions.

TABLE 6

DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION ASSUMPTIONS
Direction Route Share of Total Trips
North Zinfandel Drive 70%
West Mather Blvd 15%
South Zinfandel Drive 15%
Trip Assignment. The assignment of project trips to its access points will reflect the overall regional trip distribution assumptions, the internal travel time through the site to each driveway for individual users and the traffic controls in place at each driveway. Figures 5 and 6 identify “project only” trips assuming access as approved and with access as proposed with a signalized access on Zinfandel Drive.

Table 7 compares the volume of traffic using each project driveway under the two access alternatives. As shown, under the approved plan the majority of the project’s trips would be expected to use Baroque Drive.

The addition of the signalized access to Zinfandel Drive would shift traffic patterns and the new signalized driveway would carry the majority of project trips.

TABLE 7

TRIP ASSIGNMENT TO PROJECT DRIVEWAYS
Access Location
Approved Plan Proposed Plan
Daily Volume
(ADT) Share of Total Daily Volume(ADT) Share of Total
North Zinfandel Driveway 202 7% 337 11%
Central Zinfandel Driveway 929 31% 649 22%
South Zinfandel Driveway - - 2,000 67%
Baroque Drive Access 1,855 62% - -
Total 2,986 100% 2,986 100%
Traffic Operational Analysis
Traffic Volumes. The evaluation of traffic operating conditions with occupancy of Stonecreek Industrial Center makes use of the “Existing Plus Project” traffic volumes presented in Figures 7 and 8.

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 478 of 1542 ends

Intersection Level of Service. Table 8 compares the peak hour intersection Levels of Service occurring with implementation of the approved access plan and with the proposed traffic signal on Zinfandel Drive.

As indicated, all locations would satisfy the City of Rancho Cordova’s minimum LOS D standard under either access scenario. In the morning peak hour the length of average delays at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection would be less with the addition of signalized access to Zinfandel Drive.

Intersection Queues. Table 9 compares the 95th percentile queues anticipated at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection and at the new signalized access under the two access scenarios. By reducing the number of turning vehicles the proposed access plan reduces queue lengths.

The primary difference in the two alternatives is in the southbound left turn lane from Zinfandel Drive onto Baroque Drive. At this location the a.m. peak hour queue is likely to exceed the available storage length if approved access is implemented. However, this queue length is shortened with creation of the proposed signalized access, and the resulting 95thpercentile queue is contained within the available storage.

Average Travel Speed on Zinfandel Drive. Table 10 compares average travel speeds along Zinfandel Drive under the two access alternatives. As indicated, converting the pedestrian / bicycle crossing signal to a full access intersection, the proposed access plan could lower the average speed of northbound travel from Douglas Road to the new access by 14 mph in the a.m. peak hour and 9 mph in the p.m. peak hour, but would increase the average speed north of that point. As a result, there is no difference between the two access alternatives in the average travel speed along the overall length of northbound Zinfandel Drive from Douglas Road to International Drive. Similarly, while there are very minor variations in the average speed from intersection to intersection, there is no appreciable difference in the overall average speed on southbound Zinfandel Drive.

Effects on Alternative Transportation Modes. The extent to which the proposed change to Stonecreek Industrial Center access affects pedestrian and bicycle circulation has been considered.

Trail Modification. To accommodate the proposed access the existing Stonecreek Community Trail would be modified as shown in the project site plan and in Figure 3. New trail extensions would be created along both sides of Zinfandel Drive for about 100 feet to the new signalized intersection. A new crossing on the south side of the intersection would be created.

Effects on Trail Users. The change could have these effects on Trail users:

1. The new crossing would lengthen the distance along the trail for pedestrians and cyclists.

2. The new crossing at a new vehicular access could introduce the possibility of conflicts between pedestrian – cyclists and automobiles – trucks that do not exist today. This issue can be addressed in the final design of the interaction, however, by designing the traffic signal to separate pedestrians from traffic turning left out of the site and by widening the intersection as necessary to ensure that truck turning requirements do not encroach into opposing driveway lanes or into the Class II bike lanes along Zinfandel Drive. The engineered layout included in the appendix addresses these requirements. Wide landings, consistent with the current crossing layout would also be needed at the new intersection corners.

3. The current crossing layout provides bicyclists with a view up and down Zinfandel Drive as they approach the street. Bicyclists can identify a gap in automobile traffic and cross without using ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 479 of 1542 ends

the signal, as was observed. The introduction of turns on the trail at the new intersection could require arriving bicyclists to stop to determine the availability of gaps in traffic, which could enhance safety at the new crossing.

Truck Traffic. The industrial center will generate truck traffic that uses Zinfandel Drive to reach the regional circulation system. As discussed earlier, 152 to 362 daily truck trips could occur. Under the approved plan, all truck arriving from the north would use Baroque Drive and the Tinta Tina Drive intersection to enter the site. Exiting traffic would be split between Baroque Drive and the two approved Zinfandel Drive driveways, but it is likely that truck drivers would favor the signalized Baroque Drive connection. With the proposed signalized access on Zinfandel Drive the site layout can be configured to direct truck to that location, and trucks will not use Baroque Drive.

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 480 of 1542 ends

TABLE 8

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
Intersection Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approved Access Proposed Access Approved Access Proposed Access Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Zinfandel Drive / Bear Hollow Drive Signal 14 B 14 B 13 B 13 B Zinfandel Drive / Spoto Drive Signal 6 A 6 A 6 A 6 A
Zinfandel Dr / Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd Signal 21 C 14 B 17 B 14 B Zinfandel Drive / North Driveway WB Stop 12 B 12 B 11 B 12 B Zinfandel Drive / Central Driveway WB Stop 13 B 13 B 12 B 12 B Zinfandel Drive / South Driveway Signal - - 10 B - - 6 A Zinfandel Drive / Stonecreek Community
Bike Trail Crossing
Signal 1 A - - 1 A - -
TABLE 9

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK PERIOD QUEUES
Intersection Direction Lane
Storage
(feet)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approved Access Proposed Access Approved Access Proposed Access Volume
(veh/hr)
95th %
Queue (feet)
Volume
(vph)
95th %
Queue (feet)
Volume
(vph)
95th %
Queue (feet)
Volume
(vph)
95 th %
Queue (feet)
Zinfandel Dr /
Baroque Dr /
Mather Blvd
NB
Left 180 25 45 27 30 47 45 45 45
Through - 866 200 864 195 625 180 682 160
SB left 170 291 200 30 50 79 85 60 100
EB Left 160 50 70 55 40 15 30 15 35
WB All 7401 92 70 75 45 225 130 105 70
Zinfandel Dr / Access
SB Left - - - 317 180 - - 41 100
Through - 382 65 375 75 975 165 925 380
NB Through - 906 70 906 215 467 30 467 85
BOLD values exceed available storage by 20 feet
1 distance to Tinta Fina Dr intersection
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 481 of 1542 ends

TABLE 10

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ZINFANDEL DRIVE TRAVEL SPEEDS
Intersection Direction
Distance
(miles)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approved Access Proposed Access Approved Access Proposed Access Average
Speed (mph) LOS
Average
Speed (mph) LOS
Average
Speed (mph) LOS
Average
Speed (mph) LOS
International Drive SB - - - - - - - - -
Bear Hollow Drive SB 0.26 20 E 20 E 21 D 21 D
Spoto Drive SB 0.32 34 C 34 C 32 C 32 B
Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd SB 0.36 29 C 25 D 22 D 23 D
Bike Trail Crossing / signal SB 0.25 33 C 32 B 32 C 24 D Douglas Road SB 0.82 43 A 43 A 40 B 40 B
Total SB 2.00 33 C 33 C 30 C 31 C
Douglas Road NB - - - - - - - - -
Bike Trail Crossing / signal NB 0.82 51 A 37 B 52 A 43 A Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd NB 0.25 13 F 18 E 17 E 18 E
Spoto Drive NB 0.36 38 B 38 B 37 B 37 C
Bear Hollow Drive NB 0.32 25 D 25 D 24 D 24 D
International Drive NB 0.26 17 E 17 E 16 E 16 E
Total NB 2.00 28 C 28 C 29 C 29 C
Free flow speed is 55 mph
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 482 of 1542 ends

Long Term Traffic Conditions
The difference in traffic operations between the two access alternatives was also considered within the contexts of long term traffic conditions.

Traffic Volume Forecasts. The assessment of long term traffic operations in this area of Rancho Cordova makes use of three sources of information.
• Peak hour intersection volumes / geometry identified in the Villages of Zinfandel Traffic Impact Analysis (VZTIA)1. This work accompanied the original Sacramento County entitlement for the Stonecreek area.
• City of Rancho Cordova travel demand forecasting model Year 2055 intersection traffic volume forecasts. A.m. and p.m. peak hour forecasts were available for the Zinfandel Drive intersections at International Drive and the Douglas Road. • Current development plans for the vacant parcel along the west side of Zinfandel Drive between Bear Hollow Drive and Spoto Drive.

The approach taken to develop future traffic volume is as follows:

A. Future turning movement forecasts from the VZTIA we compared to the traffic model projections for Zinfandel Drive south of International Drive. That review indicated that northbound traffic volume in the a.m. peak hour was similar but the traffic model forecasts for the southbound direction were less than half of the VZTIA projections. Similarly, in the p.m. peak hour the two sources were similar in the southbound direction, but the traffic model’s northbound volume was about half of the VZTIA volumes.

B. Local trip generation / distribution and assignment analysis was conducted for the development project at Bear Hollow Drive.

C. VZTIA forecast were manually factored to reflect the traffic model relationships and the volume of traffic produced by the Bear Hollow Drive project and by Stonecreek Industrial Center. In the case of the Industrial Center the share of project traffic oriented to the south was assumed to increase from 15% under existing conditions to 25% in the future as the southern Rancho Cordova area is developed.

Resulting future a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volume forecasts assuming the two project access alternatives are presented in Figures 9 and 10.

Future Circulation System Improvements. The analysis of future traffic operations assumes implementation of the long term improvements assumed in the VZTIA. As shown in the traffic volume figures, these improvements include:
• Completion of 6-lane Zinfandel Drive south to Douglas Road • At the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection:
- Dual northbound left turn lanes on Zinfandel Drive
- Right turn lanes on Zinfandel Drive
1 Villages of Zinfandel Traffic Impact Analysis, DKS, 2001 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 483 of 1542 ends

- Dual eastbound right turn lanes on Mather Blvd
- Westbound left turn lane on Baroque Drive
Intersection Level of Service. Table 11 compares the peak hour intersection Levels of Service occurring with implementation of the approved access plan and with the proposed traffic signal on Zinfandel Drive.

These conditions assume a PHF of 1.00. As indicated, all locations would satisfy the City of Rancho Cordova’s minimum LOS D standard under either access scenario. In the morning peak hour the length of average delays at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection would be less with the addition of signalized access to Zinfandel Drive.

Intersection Queues. Table 12 compares the 95thpercentile queues anticipated at the Zinfandel Drive / Baroque Drive / Mather Blvd intersection and at the new signalized access under the two access scenarios. By reducing the number of turning vehicles the proposed access plan reduces queue lengths.

The primary difference in the two alternatives remains in the southbound left turn lane from Zinfandel Drive onto Baroque Drive. At this location the a.m. peak hour queue is likely to exceed the available storage length if approved access is implemented. The queue length is shortened with creation of the proposed signalized access, and the resulting 95thpercentile queue will not exceed the available storage.

Average Travel Speed on Zinfandel Drive. Table 13 compares average travel speeds along Zinfandel Drive under the two access alternatives. As indicated, converting the pedestrian / bicycle crossing signal to a full access intersection the proposed access plan could lower the average speed of northbound travel from Douglas Road to the new access by 17 mph in the a.m. peak hour and 7 mph in the p.m. peak hour, but would increase the average speed on segments north of that point. As a result, there is only a 1 mph difference between the two access alternatives in the average northbound travel speed along the overall length of Zinfandel Drive. In the southbound direction the new signalized access would increase the speed on the segment approaching Baroque Drive and lower the speed approaching the new access.

However, the overall speed along the length of Zinfandel Drive will not be appreciably different.

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 484 of 1542 ends

TABLE 11

LONG TERM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
Intersection Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approved Access Proposed Access Approved Access Proposed Access Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Average Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Zinfandel Drive / Bear Hollow Drive Signal 18 C 18 C 22 C 22 C Zinfandel Drive / Spoto Drive Signal 7 A 7 A 10 B 10 B
Zinfandel Dr / Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd Signal 36 D 25 C 31 D 28 C Zinfandel Drive / North Driveway WB Stop 29 D 30 D 16 C 17 C Zinfandel Drive / Central Driveway WB Stop 33 D 31 D 19 C 18 C Zinfandel Drive / South Driveway Signal - - 10 B - - 5 A Zinfandel Drive / Bike Trail Crossing Signal 1 A - - 1 A - - ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 485 of 1542 ends

TABLE 12

LONG TERM PEAK PERIOD QUEUES
Intersection Direction Lane
Storage
(feet)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approved Access Proposed Access Approved Access Proposed Access Volume
(veh/hr)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Volume
(vph)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Volume
(vph)
95th %
Queue
(feet)
Volume
(vph)
95 th %
Queue
(feet)
Zinfandel Dr /
Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd
NB
Left 180 500 155 502 120 200 95 213 105
through - 1,880 280 1,878 215 1,030 175 1,087 195
SB Left 170 280 225 19 105 75 180 41 140
EB Left 160 60 60 60 60 65 65 65 70
WB Left 7401 240 190 233 170 190 165 140 135
Zinfandel Dr / Ped Xing /
Access
SB
Left - - - 317 170 - - 41 50
Through - 960 125 953 100 2,395 310 2,345 270
NB Through - 2,395 190 2,395 220 1,024 120 1,025 140
BOLD values exceed available storage by 20 feet
1 distance to Tinta Fina Drive intersection
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 486 of 1542 ends

TABLE 13

LONG TERM ZINFANDEL DRIVE TRAVEL SPEEDS
Intersection Direction
Distance
(miles)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approved Access Proposed Access Approved Access Proposed Access Average
Speed (mph) LOS
Average
Speed (mph) LOS
Average
Speed (mph) LOS
Average
Speed (mph) LOS
International Drive SB - - - - - - - - -
Bear Hollow Drive SB 0.26 16 F 16 F 14 F 14 F
Spoto Drive SB 0.32 28 C 28 C 26 D 26 D
Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd SB 0.36 22 D 21 D 22 D 23 D
Bike Trail Crossing / signal SB 0.25 32 C 31 C 29 C 23 D Douglas Road SB 0.82 39 B 41 B 34 B 34 B
Total SB 2.00 29 C 29 C 24 D 24 D
Douglas Road NB - - - - - - - - -
Bike Trail Crossing / signal NB 0.82 49 A 38 B 51 A 44 A Baroque Dr / Mather Blvd NB 0.25 14 F 16 F 20 E 22 E
Spoto Drive NB 0.36 36 B 35 B 36 B 36 B
Bear Hollow Drive NB 0.32 22 E 21 E 24 D 24 D
International Drive NB 0.26 13 F 13 F 11 E 11 F
Total NB 2.00 24 D 23 D 24 D 23 D
Free flow speed is 55 mph
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 487 of 1542 ends

Overall Conclusion

4. The new crossing could increase the distance traveled by pedestrians and cyclists along the trail by about 200 feet.

6. Because the trail approaches Zinfandel Drive at a 90 degree angle, the current crossing layout provides bicyclists with a view up and down Zinfandel Drive as the approach the street.

Bicyclists can identify a gap in automobile traffic and cross without using the signal, as was observed. The introduction of turns on the trail at the new intersection could require arriving bicyclists to stop to determine the availability of gaps in traffic.

7. Limiting Baroque Drive access to “emergency vehicles only” would divert roughly 1,865 daily project trips from Baroque Drive to other access locations.

8. The new signalized access will allow the site to be designed to focus truck traffic (i.e., 152 to 362 daily trips) away from Baroque Drive.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Kenneth D. Anderson, P.E.

President
Attachments. Figures, engineered site plan, Traffic Counts, LOS Calc Worksheets, Villages at Zinfandel Traffic Study Appendix
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 488 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 1

VICINITY MAP
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022

PROJECT

LOCATION
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 489 of 1542 ends

figure
2 APPROVED SITE PLAN
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 490 of 1542 ends

figure
3 SITE PLAN WITH NEW SIGNALIZED ACCESS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 491 of 1542 ends

3 7
4 6
5 1
2 KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 4

EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr (South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Third Driveway
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection
(40) 5
(1000) 445
(165) 85
0 (10)50 (955 (540)
20)
25 (20)
5 (5)
5 (5)
(130) 170
(5) 1
(35) 30
(45) 30
(825) 340
(15) 30
40 (30)20 (790 (420)
10)
30 (20)
20 (5)
25 (80)
(15) 50
(15) 0
(15) 10
(0) 5
(920) 400
(60) 55
10 (885 (495)
10)
(50) 55
(10) 5
(0) 0
(30) 20
0 (0)
55 (75)
(30) 20
(40) 50
R1-1
(925) 375
850 (460)
(925) 375
850 (460)
(925) 375
850 (460)
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 492 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 5

APPROVED PROJECT ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS 3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr
(South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/ Access/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Ped Crossing
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection (0) 0
(34) 261
(0) 0
0 (0)0 34 (232)
(0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
(0) 0
(0) 0
(0) 0
(34) 261
(0) 0(0) 0
5 25 (174)11 (1)
(37)
8 (58)
2 (12)
7 (50)
(0) 0
(7) 56
(0) 0
(0) 0
(34) 261
(0) 0
0 34 (232)
(0) 0
(0)
(0) 0
3 7
4 6
5 1
2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 493 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 6

PROJECT ONLY WITH SIGNALIZED ACCESS

TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr (South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/ EVA Access/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Third Driveway
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection (0) 0
(34) 261
(0) 0
0 (0)0 34 (232)
(0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
(0) 0
(0) 0
(0) 0(0) 0
(34) 261
(0) 0
0 (0)7 34 (232)
(50)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
(0) 0
(0) 0
(7) 56
(0) 0
(34) 261
(0) 0
0 34 (232)
(0) 0
(0)
(0) 0
3 7
4 6
5 1
2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 494 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 7

EXISTING PLUS APPROVED PROJECT

TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr (South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/ Access/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Ped Crossing
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection
(40) 5
(1034) 706
(165) 85
0 (10)50 (989 (772)
20)
25 (20)
5 (5)
5 (5)
(130) 170
(5) 1
(35) 30
(79) 291
(825) 340
(15) 30
51 (31)25 (815 (594)
47)
38 (78)
22 (17)
32 (130)
(15) 50
(22) 56
(15) 10
(0) 5
(954) 661
(60) 55
10 (919 (727)
10)
(50) 55
(10) 5
3 7
4 6
5 1
2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 495 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 8

EXISTING PLUS PROJECT WITH SIGNALIZED ACCESS

TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr (South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/ EVA Access/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Third Driveway
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection
(40) 5
(1034) 706
(165) 85
0 (10)50 (989 (772)
20)
25 (20)
5 (5)
5 (5)
(130) 170
(5) 1
(35) 30
(45) 30
(859) 601
(15) 30
40 (30)27 (824 (652)
60)
30 (20)
20 (5)
25 (80)
(15) 50
(15) 0
(22) 66
(0) 5
(954) 661
(60) 55
10 (919 (727)
10)
(50) 55
(10) 5
3 7
4 6
5 1
2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 496 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 9

CUMULATIVE PLUS PLUS APPROVED PROJECT

TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr (South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/ Access/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Ped Crossing
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection
(50) 10
(1760) 780
(415) 240
5 (10)145 (200)1660 (780)
25 (20)
5 (5)
5 (40)
(290) 320
(5) 5
(95) 35
(75) 280
(1815) 460
(50) 100
500 (200)1610 (850)270 (180)
40 (70)
25 (20)
240 (190)
(65) 60
(60) 95
(390) 260
(10) 10
(1740) 770
(80) 80
130 (1580 (925)
80)
(100) 90
(200) 70
3 7
4 6
5 1
2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 497 of 1542 ends

KD Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Engineers
figure 10

CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT WITH SIGNALIZED ACCESS

TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
3464-02 RA 1/21/2022
3 7
2 Zinfandel Dr/ Baroque Dr (South)
Zinfandel Dr/ Spoto Dr
Tinta Fina Dr/ EVA Access/
Baroque Dr (South)
6 Zinfandel Dr/ Third Driveway
5 Zinfandel Dr/ Second Driveway
4 Zinfandel Dr/ First Driveway
1 Zinfandel Dr/ Bear Hollow Dr
Stop Sign
Legend
AM Peak Hour Volume
R1-1
XX
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volume
Signalized Intersection
(50) 10
(1760) 780
(415) 240
5 (10)145 (200)1660 (780)
25 (20)
5 (5)
5 (40)
(290) 320
(5) 5
(95) 35(4) 19 (1849) 721
(50) 100
500 (213)1619 (908)259 (179)
32 (12)
23 (8)
233 (140)
(65) 60
(53) 39
(397) 316
(0) 10
(1740) 770
(80) 80
130 (1575 (925)
80)
(100) 90
(200) 70
3 7
4 6
5 1
2 ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 498 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 499 of 1542 ends

NO TRUCKS
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ

LMLAUGENOUR

AND MEIKLE
CIVIL ENGINEERING·LAND SURVEYING·PLANNING
· REDUCED PLOT

Page 500 of 1542 ends

ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 501 of 1542 ends

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 21-070099-001 Day:

City: Rancho Cordova Date:

AM 149 292 76 5 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 84 673 123 5 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0
0 141 0 51
0 285 0 147
1 0 3 0 0 79 0 35
71 0 207 0 TEV 1912 0 2779 0 25 0 7
202 0 265 0 PHF 0.93 0.96
64 0 162 0
0 0 0 0

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 15 95 581 36 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 5 111 643 53 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 934
Zinfandel Dr & International Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Zinfandel Dr Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 7/1/2021

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 770 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
449 0 338
Cars (AM) 929 HT (AM)
International Dr

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
International Dr
408 0 467

CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 396

NORTHBOUND
Zinfandel Dr
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
3 0
0 1
00 000
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 20 120 0
4 10
2 0
3 0
082
170
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
4 4
3 0
4 0
062
060
137
275
160 79
262
207
84665121
9457436
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
47 143
61 35
198
71 14928674
11163753
3464-02
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 502 of 1542 ends

National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Zinfandel Dr & International Dr
City: Rancho Cordova Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 17 122 6 0 18 58 20 1 11 39 11 0 2 23 5 1 334
7:15 AM 22 122 8 0 17 50 22 0 7 47 21 0 9 33 15 0 373
7:30 AM 26 162 11 0 18 61 34 1 10 49 19 0 11 47 12 0 461 7:45 AM 21 180 20 1 27 77 48 0 20 54 12 0 6 31 16 2 515 8:00 AM 31 161 8 1 21 85 24 3 17 58 19 1 11 30 16 2 488 8:15 AM 33 140 14 3 10 69 43 1 24 41 14 0 7 39 7 3 448
8:30 AM 27 130 6 0 14 62 34 0 23 39 12 0 8 30 27 5 417
8:45 AM 15 115 12 0 28 80 21 1 18 57 7 0 13 43 21 3 434

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 192 1132 85 5 153 542 246 7 130 384 115 1 67 276 119 16 3470 APPROACH %'s : 13.58% 80.06% 6.01% 0.35% 16.14% 57.17% 25.95% 0.74% 20.63% 60.95% 18.25% 0.16% 14.02% 57.74% 24.90% 3.35% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 111 643 53 5 76 292 149 5 71 202 64 1 35 147 51 7 1912 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.841 0.893 0.663 0.417 0.704 0.859 0.776 0.417 0.740 0.871 0.842 0.250 0.795 0.782 0.797 0.583 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 24 117 10 2 17 135 25 0 65 61 26 0 17 66 26 3 594 4:15 PM 20 136 4 1 32 184 22 1 62 47 33 0 25 56 17 5 645 4:30 PM 20 155 11 4 22 180 28 2 69 79 36 1 22 66 26 6 727 4:45 PM 16 131 8 5 31 137 18 1 49 64 37 0 17 59 40 11 624 5:00 PM 26 151 8 1 27 182 18 2 44 60 49 1 18 84 38 5 714 5:15 PM 33 144 9 5 43 174 20 0 45 62 40 1 22 76 37 3 714 5:30 PM 30 128 2 2 25 163 16 0 35 45 36 0 27 71 23 4 607 5:45 PM 20 154 7 2 36 150 20 1 20 33 35 1 23 54 31 9 596

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 189 1116 59 22 233 1305 167 7 389 451 292 4 171 532 238 46 5221 APPROACH %'s : 13.64% 80.52% 4.26% 1.59% 13.61% 76.23% 9.75% 0.41% 34.24% 39.70% 25.70% 0.35% 17.33% 53.90% 24.11% 4.66% PEAK HR : 04:30 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 95 581 36 15 123 673 84 5 207 265 162 3 79 285 141 25 2779 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.720 0.937 0.818 0.750 0.715 0.924 0.750 0.625 0.750 0.839 0.827 0.750 0.898 0.848 0.881 0.568 21-070099-001
7/1/2021
Data - Total
Zinfandel Dr Zinfandel Dr International Dr International Dr AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.928 0.914 0.859 0.889 0.857
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.956 0.952 0.934 0.861 0.914
ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 503 of 1542 ends

National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Zinfandel Dr & International Dr
City: Rancho Cordova Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 17 119 6 0 17 56 20 1 11 39 11 0 2 22 5 1 327
7:15 AM 22 118 8 0 17 48 21 0 6 47 21 0 8 33 15 0 364
7:30 AM 26 161 11 0 17 57 34 1 10 47 17 0 11 45 12 0 449 7:45 AM 21 178 20 1 26 77 48 0 20 54 11 0 6 31 15 2 510 8:00 AM 31 160 8 1 21 85 24 3 17 57 19 1 11 29 15 2 484 8:15 AM 33 138 14 3 10 67 43 1 24 40 14 0 7 38 5 3 440
8:30 AM 27 128 6 0 14 61 34 0 23 38 12 0 8 29 24 5 409
8:45 AM 15 114 11 0 26 76 20 1 18 56 7 0 13 42 20 3 422

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 192 1116 84 5 148 527 244 7 129 378 112 1 66 269 111 16 3405 APPROACH %'s : 13.74% 79.89% 6.01% 0.36% 15.98% 56.91% 26.35% 0.76% 20.81% 60.97% 18.06% 0.16% 14.29% 58.23% 24.03% 3.46% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 111 637 53 5 74 286 149 5 71 198 61 1 35 143 47 7 1883 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.841 0.895 0.663 0.417 0.712 0.841 0.776 0.417 0.740 0.868 0.803 0.250 0.795 0.794 0.783 0.583 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 24 116 10 2 17 132 25 0 65 60 26 0 17 66 26 3 589 4:15 PM 20 135 4 1 32 183 22 1 62 47 33 0 25 54 17 5 641 4:30 PM 20 155 11 4 21 177 28 2 69 79 35 1 22 62 25 6 717 4:45 PM 15 130 8 5 31 135 18 1 49 62 37 0 17 58 39 11 616 5:00 PM 26 147 8 1 26 180 18 2 44 60 49 1 18 81 38 5 704 5:15 PM 33 142 9 5 43 173 20 0 45 61 39 1 22 74 35 3 705 5:30 PM 29 125 2 2 25 162 16 0 35 45 36 0 27 71 23 4 602 5:45 PM 20 151 7 2 36 147 20 1 20 33 34 1 22 53 31 9 587

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 187 1101 59 22 231 1289 167 7 389 447 289 4 170 519 234 46 5161 APPROACH %'s : 13.66% 80.42% 4.31% 1.61% 13.64% 76.09% 9.86% 0.41% 34.46% 39.59% 25.60% 0.35% 17.54% 53.56% 24.15% 4.75% PEAK HR : 04:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 94 574 36 15 121 665 84 5 207 262 160 3 79 275 137 25 2742 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.712 0.926 0.818 0.750 0.703 0.924 0.750 0.625 0.750 0.829 0.816 0.750 0.898 0.849 0.878 0.568 21-070099-001
7/1/2021
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.956 0.946 0.927 0.859 0.908
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.923
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.916 0.851 0.880 0.853
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Cars
Zinfandel Dr Zinfandel Dr International Dr International Dr ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 504 of 1542 ends

National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Zinfandel Dr & International Dr
City: Rancho Cordova Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7
7:15 AM 0 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9
7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 12
7:45 AM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5
8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 4
8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 8
8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 8
8:45 AM 0 1 1 0 2 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 12

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 16 1 0 5 15 2 0 1 6 3 0 1 7 8 0 65
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 94.12% 5.88% 0.00% 22.73% 68.18% 9.09% 0.00% 10.00% 60.00% 30.00% 0.00% 6.25% 43.75% 50.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 6 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 4 4 0 29
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 10
4:45 PM 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 8
5:00 PM 0 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 10
5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 9
5:30 PM 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
5:45 PM 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 9

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 2 15 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 13 4 0 60
APPROACH %'s : 11.76% 88.24% 0.00% 0.00% 11.11% 88.89% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 57.14% 42.86% 0.00% 5.56% 72.22% 22.22% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:30 PM 291 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 7 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 10 4 0 37
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.438 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.667 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.625 0.500 0.000 21-070099-001
7/1/2021
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM

0.925 0.500 0.625 0.625 0.700
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM

0.604
PM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.750 0.400 0.438 0.667
AM

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - HT
Zinfandel Dr Zinfandel Dr International Dr International Dr ITEM 11.3. ATTACHMENT 4

Page 505 of 1542 ends

Rancho Cordova City CouncilApril 18, 2022

Rancho Cordova City Council
April 18, 2022