Hemet City Council
August 9, 2022

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:

Malcolm Lilienthal
Mayor (District 3)
Karlee Meyer
Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Russ Brown
Council Member (District 2)
Joe Males
Council Member (District 4)
Linda Krupa
Council Member (District 5)

Eddie Pust
Interim City Manager
Steven Graham
Interim City Attorney
John P. Maier
City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, August 9, 2022
City Council Chamber
450 E. Latham Ave., Hemet, California 92543
REGULAR MEETING AT 7:00 P.M.

In accordance with the Governor’s Declarations of Emergency for the State of California (Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20) and the Governor’s Stay at Home Order (Executive Order N-33-20), the City of Hemet is providing alternative measures for the public to attend/view City Council Meetings.

Council Chamber: In-person participation is limited in the Council Chamber in order to maintain social distancing room capacity.

Live Stream: This meeting will be live streamed on the City's website at hemetca.gov/agenda.

Public Comments: Members of the Public who wish to comment on matters before the Council, in lieu of attending in person, may submit comments on or before 2:00 p.m. the day of the meeting by using the following link: Online Comment Form. Comments will be recorded in the official meeting record.

Teleconference: Residents may also submit public comments by teleconference during Communications from the Public by using the following Zoom link:

City Council Meeting Zoom
Webinar ID: 816 7383 0544
Passcode: 745765
Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):

US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782
We appreciate your understanding during this unprecedented time of social distancing under the Safer at Home orders. These procedures may be modified in the future as social and public gathering protocols change. Thank you.

Notice Regarding Americans with Disability Act
In compliance with the Americans with Disability Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or if you need agenda documents provide in an alternate format, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 765-2307 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
Page
CLOSED SESSION – 5:00 P.M.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - RULES OF DECORUM, RESOLUTION NO. 4545
At this time, members of the public may only comment on an item appearing on the agenda. Please adhere to the following when addressing the Council:

Comments will be limited to 3 minutes or less.

Comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not directed to individual Council Members.

Please follow the adopted rules of decorum: Resolution No. 4545.

4. DISCUSSION ITEMS

4.A CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED

LITIGATION
Significant Exposure to Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9
Number of Cases (2)

4.B CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED

LITIGATION
Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (4) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9
Number of Cases (1)

4.C PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Pursuant to Section 54957
Title: City Manager

4.D PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Pursuant to Section 54957
Title: City Attorney

4.E CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property APN: 456-050-044

Agency negotiator: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment

5. ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION

6. WORK STUDY ITEM - 6:00 P.M.

6.A A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Adopting City Council Protocols
Staff Report #22-349 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive the report on the Council Protocols from the Council Protocols Ad-Hoc Committee with assistance from the City Manager and City Attorney;

2. Review, discuss, and revise the Council Protocols as the Council deems appropriate;

3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Adopting City Council Protocols, as amended if applicable.
17 - 109
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M.

7. CALL TO ORDER

8. ROLL CALL

9. INVOCATION

10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

11. CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT

11.A City Attorney’s Report regarding Closed Session
Recommendation: Information Only

12. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Welcome to a meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Hemet • Anyone who wishes to speak during public comment or on a particular item will be required to fill out a speaker slip and turn it in to the City Clerk. Each request will cover one speaker. • There is a 3-minute-per-person time limit for all general public comments on non-public hearing items. • All who wish to speak, including Council members and staff, need to be recognized by the Mayor before speaking.
• Members of the public shall comply with the adopted Rules of Decorum, Resolution No. 4545. A copy of which can be requested through the City Clerk’s Office.

• You may also fill out a form and submit your comments online at www.hemetca.gov and it will be read aloud.

Submittal must be done before 2:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. • Please state your name and item you are commenting on before speaking.

12.A Public Comment for Items Listed on the Agenda: Consent and Discussion Items

12.B Public Comment for Items Not Listed on the Agenda, but within Jurisdictional Matter

13. PRESENTATIONS

13.A Women's Equality Day Proclamation
Women's Equality Day - Proclamation
111

13.B Never Give Up Day Proclamation
Never Give Up Day - Proclamation
113

13.C Back to School Month Proclamation
Back to School Month - Proclamation
115

13.D Eastern Municipal Water District Drought Update
Staff Report #22-341 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive a presentation from EMWD regarding the current drought update.
117 - 131

13.E Presentation on Board of State and Community Corrections, California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) Grant, Hemet Community Wide Collaborative: An Approach to Violence Reduction
Staff Report #22-313 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive a presentation on the Board of State and Community Corrections, California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant:

Hemet Community Wide Collaborative: An Approach to Violence Reduction.
133 - 142

14. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The City Council’s Procedures for Public Hearing will be as follows:
• Staff will provide a report and clarification of items presented. • The public hearing will be opened for comments for those IN FAVOR of or IN OPPOSITION to the item:
followed by rebuttal to any comments made.
• The Public Hearing will be closed, and the City Manager may respond to any questions raised by the public (the public will not have an opportunity to respond.).
• Discussion will be brought back to the City Council for direction or action.

14.A A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Hemet and Direct the Finance Director to Establish Total Project Appropriations per the CIP for New Requests Only
Staff Report #22-344 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Continue the Public Hearing and take testimony, if any; and

2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City of Hemet; and

3. Direct the Finance Director to establish total project appropriations per the CIP for new requests only.
143 - 254

14.B An Interim Urgency Ordinance of the City of Hemet, California, Extending Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-2000 Establishing Temporary Emergency Sleeping Cabins, to June 28, 2023
Staff Report #22-334 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Open the Public Hearing and take testimony, if any; and,

2. Adopt an Interim Urgency Ordinance of the City of Hemet, California, Extending Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-2000 Establishing Temporary Emergency Sleeping Cabins, to June 28, 2023.
255 - 340

14.C Public Hearing to Consider Establishing City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Tres Cerritos), to Establish an Appropriations Limit, Therefore, to Authorize the Submittal of the Levy of Special Taxes, to Submit the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of Such Community Facilities District; Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Qualified Electors of City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Tres Cerritos) Propositions Regarding the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the Annual Levy of a Special Tax Within the Community Facilities District; and, Declaring the Results of a Special Election in City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Tres Cerritos) and Directing the Recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien, generally located between Warren Road, Celeste Road and Rose Road (DR Horton)
Staff Report #22-333 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:
341 - 429

1. Open the Public Hearing and take testimony, if any; and,

2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, to establish City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Tres Cerritos), to establish an appropriations limit therefore, to authorize the submittal of the levy of special taxes, and to submit the establishment of an appropriations limit, to the qualified electors of such Community Facilities District; and,

3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, calling a special election and submitting to the qualified electors of City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022- 01 (Tres Cerritos) propositions regarding the establishment of an appropriations limit and the annual levy of a special tax within the Community Facilities District; and

4. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, declaring the results of a special election in City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Tres Cerritos) and directing the recording of a notice of special tax lien; and

5. Waive full reading, read by title only, and introduce an Ordinance entitled, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Tres Cerritos) authorizing the levy of a special tax therein.

15. RECEIVE AND FILE

15.A Investment Report for May 2022
Staff Report #22-317 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive and file the Investment Report for May 2022.
431 - 549

15.B The City of Hemet Warrant Registers Dated June 30, 2022, in the amount of $951,411.94 and July 14, 2022, in the amount of $4,704,593.72. The Payroll Periods of June 13, 2022 – June 26, 2022, in the amount of $799,974.01 and June 27, 2022 – July 10, 2022, in the amount of $1,536,575.55
Staff Report #22-327 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive and file the City of Hemet Warrant Registers.
551 - 686

15.C Code Compliance Strategic Plan - Neighborhood Enhancement Program (NEP) Update
Staff Report #22-331 - Pdf
Recommendation:
687 - 689

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive and file the update on the Neighborhood Enhancement Programs (NEP) incorporated within the Code Compliance Division's Strategic Plan Objectives.

16. CONSENT CALENDAR
All Consent Calendar items will be acted upon by a single action of the City Council unless otherwise requested by an individual Council Member for separate consideration.

16.A Approval of the City Council Meeting Minutes of April 26, 2022, and City Council Meeting Minutes of May 24, 2022
Staff Report #22-346 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Approve the City Council Meeting Minutes of April 26, 2022, and City Council Meeting Minutes of May 24, 2022.
691 - 706

16.B Consider Authorization of a Letter of Opposition to Senate Bill 1127 (Atkins): Workers' compensation: liability presumptions, as amended June 13, 2022
Staff Report #22-321 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Consider Authorization of a Letter of Opposition to Senate Bill 1127 (Atkins): Workers' compensation: liability presumptions, as amended June 13, 2022.
707 - 717

16.C A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Declaring a 2005 KME Type 1 Fire Engine (Number 3263) as Surplus and Donating the Fire Engine to the Hemet Unified School District
Staff Report #22-343 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, declaring Engine Number 3263 Surplus and Donating the Fire Engine to the Hemet Unified School District.
719 - 724

16.D A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding the Purchase of a First-In Alerting Advanced System for the Amount of $471,663.24 from Westnet, Inc. utilizing the HGAC discount contract #EC07-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and all Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement, Authorizing Additional Installation Expenditures Not to Exceed 11% of the Original Price or 725 - 749

$525,000; Authorizing the Finance Director to Re-appropriate $200,000 from ARPA fund account 270-7018-5400 to ARPA fund account 270- 7017-5400 as Supplemental Appropriations to Cover the Additional Costs Staff Report #22-332 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding the Purchase of a First-In Alerting Advanced System for the Amount of $471,663.24 from Westnet, Inc. utilizing the HGAC discount contract #EC07-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and all Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement, Authorizing Additional Installation Expenditures Not to Exceed 11% of the Original Price or $525,000; Authorizing the Finance Director to Reappropriate $200,000 from ARPA fund account 270-7018-5400 to ARPA fund account 270-7017-5400 as Supplemental Appropriations to Cover the Additional Costs.

16.E A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding Willdan Engineering, a Construction Management and Inspection Agreement as Approved in Final Form by the City Attorney for an Amount Not to Exceed $305,789.00 for the Citywide Sewer Replacement and Relining Project, CIP 5653B Staff Report #22-329 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding Willdan Engineering, a Construction Management and Inspection Agreement as Approved in Final Form by the City Attorney for an Amount Not to Exceed
$305,789.00 for the Citywide Sewer Replacement and Re-lining Project, CIP 5653B; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all agreement documents as approved in final form by the City Attorney.
751 - 1216

16.F A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Accepting the Funding Award in the Amount of $120,150 from the State of California, Department of Recycling Resources and Recovery, Through the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant; and Authorizing the Finance Director to Record Revenues to Account 110-0454 in the amount of $120,150, and to Record a Supplemental Appropriation of $120,150 in the Public Works Park Fund 110-4250-2801 for Eligible Funding Expenditures
Staff Report #22-328 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:
1217 -
1223

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, accepting the funding award in the amount of $120,150 from the State of California, Department of Recycling Resources and Recovery, through the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant; and authorizing the Finance Director to record revenues to account 110-0454 in the Amount of $120,150, and record a supplemental appropriation of $120,150 in the Public Works Park Fund 110-4250-2801 for eligible funding expenditures.

16.G A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Ongoing Agreement with Liebert, Cassidy, Whitmore for Continued Representation in Employee-Related Matters, for an Annual Not-to-Exceed Amount of $100,000, with a One-Time Exception of an Adjusted Annual Not-to-Exceed Amount of $135,000 for FY 21/22 Staff Report #22-345 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Ongoing Agreement with Liebert, Cassidy, Whitmore for Continued Representation in Employee-Related Matters, for an Annual Not-to-Exceed Amount of $100,000, with a One-Time Exception of an Adjusted Annual Not-to-Exceed Amount of $135,000 for FY 21/22. 1225 -
1233

16.H A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Hemet and Edward J. Pust
Staff Report #22-342 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the First Amendment to Employment Agreement Between the City of Hemet and Edward J. Pust.
1235 -
1241

16.I A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Rescinding Resolution 2021-001, and Authorizing Investment of City of Hemet Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund
Staff Report #22-318 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Rescinding Resolution 2021-001, and Authorizing Investment of City of Hemet Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund.
1243 -
1248

16.J Resolutions of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving Replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Improvement Security for Tract Map Nos. 33825 and 33825-1, located in McSweeny 1249 -
1388

Farms Specific Plan Area, north of McSweeny Parkway and east of State Street (Richmond American Homes)
Staff Report #22-336 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, approving a replacement subdivision improvement agreement and improvement security for tract map No. 33825, located in the McSweeny Farms specific plan area, north of McSweeny Parkway and east of State Street (Richmond American Homes); and,

2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, approving a replacement subdivision improvement agreement and improvement security for tract map No. 33825-1, located in the McSweeny Farms specific plan area, north of McSweeny Parkway and east of State Street (Richmond American Homes).

16.K A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding the Purchase of Two (2) Fully-Outfitted 2023 Chevrolet Traverse LS W/1FL for the Amount of $100,731.29 from National Auto Fleet Group Utilizing the Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract #091521-NAFG Competitively Solicited Purchasing Contract and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement
Staff Report #22-281 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, awarding the purchase of two (2) fully-outfitted 2023 Chevrolet Traverse LS W/1FL for the Amount of $100,731.29 from National Auto Fleet Group utilizing the Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract #091521-NAFG competitively solicited purchasing contract and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement and purchase orders in support of the agreement.
1389 -
1419

16.L A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding the Purchase of One (1) Fully-Outfitted 2023 Ford Transit T-350 Prisoner Transport Van for the Amount of $86,917.37 from National Auto Fleet Group Utilizing the Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract #091521-NAFG Competitively Solicited Purchasing Contract and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement
Staff Report #22-340 - Pdf
Recommendation:
1421 -
1450

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, awarding the purchase of (1) Fully-Outfitted 2023 Ford Transit T-350 Prisoner Transport Van for the Amount of $86,917.37 from National Auto Fleet Group Utilizing the Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract #091521- NAFG Competitively Solicited Purchasing Contract and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement.

16.M A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. a Construction Management and Inspection Agreement in an Amount Not to Exceed $230,914.75 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Upgrades Project, CIP No. 5651, Federal Aid Project No. HSIPL-5186(017); Authorizing the City Manager to Execute All Contract Documents, and Authorizing the Finance Director to Appropriate an Additional $69,504.75 of Unencumbered DIF (Fund 329) to Fund the Construction and Construction Management of this Project
Staff Report #22-261 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding Southstar Engineering & Consulting, Inc. a Construction Management and Inspection Agreement in an Amount Not to Exceed $230,914.75 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Upgrades Project, CIP No. 5651, Federal Aid Project No. HSIPL-5186(017); Authorizing the City Manager to Execute All Contract Documents, and Authorizing the Finance Director to Appropriate an Additional $69,504.75 of Unencumbered DIF (Fund 329) to Fund the Construction and Construction Management of this Project.
1451 -
1695

16.N A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding Genesis Construction, Citywide Sewer replacement, CIP 5653B in the Amount of $2,417,000.00, and Waive any Minor Bid Irregularities, and Authorize the City Manager to Execute all Contract Documents and Approve Additional Construction Expenditures Not to Exceed 10% of the Contract Amount or $241,700.00, and Authorize the City Clerk to Record the Notice of Completion upon Acceptance of the Work by the City Engineer
Staff Report #22-326 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, awarding Genesis Construction Citywide Sewer replacement, CIP 5653B in the amount of $2,417,000.00, and Waive any Minor Bid Irregularities, 1697 -
1789

and Authorize the City Manager to Execute all Contract Documents and Approve Additional Construction Expenditures Not to Exceed 10% of the Contract Amount or $241,700.00, and Authorize the City Clerk to Record the Notice of Completion upon Acceptance of the Work by the City Engineer.

16.O A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Authorizing the Finance Director to Increase Revenues by $60,000 and Establish Supplemental Appropriations in FY2021/22 of $60,000 for the Previously Approved Fourth Amendment for Services Between the City of Hemet and 4Leaf, Inc.

Staff Report #22-319 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Authorizing the Finance Director to Increase Revenues by $60,000 and Establish Supplemental Appropriations in FY2021/22 of $60,000 for the Previously Approved Fourth Amendment for Services Between the City of Hemet and 4Leaf, Inc.
1791 -
1796

16.P A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding the Purchase of a 45 Foot Public Safety Mobile Command Center for the Amount of $1,199,976.50, from LDV Custom Specialty Vehicles utilizing the HGACBuy contract #AM10-20, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement
Staff Report #22-284 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding the Purchase of a 45-Foot Public Safety Mobile Command Center for the Amount of $1,199,976.50 from LDV Custom Specialty Vehicles utilizing the HGACBuy contract #AM10-20, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and Purchase Orders in Support of the Agreement.
1797 -
1857

16.Q A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Agreement for Services between the City of Hemet and Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. for a Contract Amount Annually of $200,000 and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement for a Three (3) Year Term With Up To Two (2) Additional One (1) Year Extensions
Staff Report #22-312 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:
1859 -
1883

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Agreement for Services between the City of Hemet and Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. for a Contract Amount Annually of $200,000 and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement for a Three (3) Year Term With Up To Two (2) Additional One (1) Year Extensions.

17. DISCUSSION - ACTION ITEMS

17.A A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, to Join in Support or Become a Board Member of Solve the Water Crisis Coalition Staff Report #22-339 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California to join in support or become a Board Member of Solve the Water Crisis Coalition.
1885 -
1902

17.B A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving an Agreement for Consulting Services with SoftResources LLC for the Acquisition of an Enterprise Resource Planning Software System in the amount of $132,400 and Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute the Agreement, Purchase Orders, and all other Supporting Documents related to the Agreement
Staff Report #22-322 - Pdf
Recommendation:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving an Agreement for Consulting Services with SoftResources LLC for the Acquisition of an Enterprise Resource Planning Software System in the amount of $132,400 and Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute the Agreement, Purchase Orders, and all other Supporting Documents related to the Agreement.
1903 -
2213

18. CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS

COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN

1. Infrastructure Commission

2. League of California Cities

3. Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency

4. Ramona Bowl Board of Directors

5. Hemet San Jacinto Water Master Board *

6. Western Community Energy

7. Western Riverside Council of Governments *

8. CAJPIA Board

COUNCIL MEMBER KRUPA

1. Hemet Housing Authority

2. Investment Oversight Committee

3. Hemet Public Library Board of Trustees

4. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission *

5. League of California Cities

6. Riverside County Transportation Commission *

7. Riverside Transit Agency

8. Western Riverside County Conservation Authority *

9. Hemet San Jacinto Water Master Board *

10.Planning Commission

COUNCIL MEMBER MALES

1. Hemet Housing Authority

2. Skate Park Committee

3. League of California Cities

4. Riverside Transit Agency *

5. Western Riverside Council of Governments *

6. Planning Commission

MAYOR PRO TEM MEYER

1. Investment Oversight Committee

2. League of California Cities

3. CAJPIA Board

MAYOR LILIENTHAL

1. Hemet Housing Authority

2. Skate Park Committee

3. Community Action Commission of Riverside County

4. League of California Cities

5. Riverside County Transportation Commission *

6. Riverside Transit Agency *

7. Western Riverside Council of Governments *

AD-HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS

1. Council Protocols Ad-Hoc Committee (Brown/Krupa)

2. Vision and Mission Ad-Hoc Committee (Lilienthal/Meyer)

3. Clean up/Graffiti Ad-Hoc Committee (Lilienthal/Meyer)

4. Homeless Outreach Ad-Hoc Committee (Lilienthal/Meyer)

5. Business Outreach Ad-Hoc Committee (Males/Lilienthal)

6. City Attorney RFP Ad-Hoc Committee (Brown/Meyer)

7. Cal Trans Liaison Ad-Hoc Committee (Brown/Krupa)

8. CDBG Ad-Hoc Committee (Lilienthal/Males)

9. Banner Program Ad-Hoc Committee (Krupa/Males)

INTERIM CITY MANAGER PUST

19. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
If Members of Council have items for consideration at a future City Council meeting, please state the agenda item to provide direction to the City Manager.

1. Broadcasting of City Council Meetings

2. Animal Control Regulations for Businesses

3. Solar Feasibility

4. Review of Resolution No. 4703

5. Review of Section 82-172 of the City of Hemet Municipal Code

6. Traffic Study for Intersections of Myers Street/Devonshire Avenue & Warren Road/Devonshire Avenue

20. ADJOURNMENT

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, John Paul Maier, MMC, City Clerk for the City of Hemet, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall located at 445 E. Florida Ave., the Council Chamber located at 450 E. Latham Ave., Hemet, CA, and the City Website.

Date & Time: August 4, 2022 at 5:15 p.m.

Meeting Schedule: The City Council of the City of Hemet regularly meets on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m., unless otherwise noted. Closed and Special Sessions will be duly noticed as needed.

Council Agendas: Agendas for Regular Meetings are available for public review on the City’s website at hemetca.gov and in the City Clerk’s Office, 445 E. Florida Ave. typically by 4:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the meeting, but no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Agendas for Closed and Special Sessions are made available at least 72 hours prior to the meeting when possible, but no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting.

Livestream: Regular City Council Meetings are available for viewing during the meeting at hemetca.gov.

Use of Equipment: Please contact the City Clerk’s Office if requesting to use the chamber equipment as part of a scheduled presentation 24 hours prior to the meeting at (951) 765-2307

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Aug 09 2022
Department: City Attorney
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Steven Graham, Interim City Attorney;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☒ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Adopting City Council Protocols RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive the report on the Council Protocols from the Council Protocols Ad-Hoc Committee with assistance from the City Manager and City Attorney;

2. Review, discuss, and revise the Council Protocols as the Council deems appropriate;

3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Adopting City Council Protocols, as amended if applicable.

BACKGROUND:

At the February 25, 2020 meeting of the City Council, the City Council created the Council Protocols Ad-Hoc Committee and the Mayor assigned Councilmembers Brown and Krupa (then serving as Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem respectively) to the Committee. The Committee has met diligently with the City Manager and City Attorney, as required since that time to develop the Council Protocols attached to this report.

On February 8, 2022, the City Council held an initial discussion regarding the City Council Protocols and determined to continue the item for one month to provide City Councilmembers the opportunity to review.

On February 22, 2022, the City Council adopted a Policy on Admonishments and Censure, and directed the City Attorney to revise the draft City Council Protocols to incorporate this new policy.

ANALYSIS:

Beginning in January 2021, the City Council held several community meetings to discuss and develop the City of Hemet Strategic Plan. The purpose of the Strategic Plan was to ensure that the City of

6.A

Hemet is a model of excellence in local government, providing a safe, well-planned community of equal opportunity for all. In particular, the Strategic Plan includes the following values:
• Open, honest, and representative form of democracy;
• Operating with the highest ideals of honor and integrity in order to merit the respect, trust, and confidence of the citizens of Hemet
• Acknowledging the Council's primary responsibility is to those who live, work, visit or otherwise come into contact with the City of Hemet
Of the five overarching goals, one that has received a significant amount of attention by the City Council in the following year has been an emphasis on Organizational Effectiveness, which includes the City Council adopting policies that provide consistency in governance and lessening of liabilities.

The Council Protocols included with this report intend on providing both a procedure for the Councilmembers to govern themselves effectively, but also to serve as a guide to members of the public in their interactions with the Council. The operation of local government is highly regulated, under state laws such as the Brown Act and Political Reform Act, along with FPPC regulations and common law provisions related to due process. By adopting the Council Protocols, the Committee seeks to not only summarize existing law, but elevate the operation of the Hemet City Council to a higher level of transparency and ethical decision-making.

DISCUSSION:

The Council Protocols contain a significant number of provisions, which are outlined below and summarized in the attached PowerPoint Presentation. The City Council is requested to review, discuss, and revise the Council Protocols as the City Council deems appropriate.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

On February 25, 2020, the Council Protocols Ad-Hoc Committee was formed and Councilmembers Brown and Krupa were appointed. The Committee has met regularly since then to develop the Council Protocols.

On February 8, 2022, the City Council held an initial discussion regarding the City Council Protocols and determined to continue the item for one month to provide City Councilmembers the opportunity to review.

On February 22, 2022, the City Council adopted a Policy on Admonishments and Censure, and directed the City Attorney to revise the draft City Council Protocols to incorporate this new policy.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

The Council Protocols are designed to meet the Strategic Plan Goal of Organizational Effectiveness, which seeks to "identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability". Finalizing the Council Protocols is listed as an Action Item under Organizational Effectiveness in the Strategic Plan.

6.A

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
ALTERNATIVE(S):

In the alternative to adopting the Council Protocols, the City Council may elect to do any of the following:

1. Refer the matter back to the Committee to incorporate the City Council's feedback into a future draft;

2. Direct staff, including the City Manager or City Attorney, to draft language amending the Council Protocols and return at a future City Council meeting

3. Table the item and do not approve the Council Protocols.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1: HMT - Council Protocols Resolution
Attachment 2: Council Protocols PowerPoint
Attachment 4: Rosenberg's Rules of Order
Attachment 3_ Hemet - City Council Protocols

6.A

CITY OF HEMET
Hemet, California
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING CITY COUNCIL PROTOCOLS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, desires to operate in a transparent and efficient manner to give the public confidence in the City Council’s decision-making; and
WHEREAS, members of the Hemet City Council are required to comply with state ethics laws, conflict of interest regulations and disclosure, and all requirements related to open meeting laws; and WHEREAS, The City Council Protocols provides a procedure and guide for both the City Council and members of the public regarding important aspects of City Council protocol, responsibilities and activities.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the City of Hemet Council Protocols, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED ON this _______________ day of __________________ . 2022.
________________________________
Malcolm Lilienthal, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

6.A

Hemet CityCouncil
February 8,2022
City Council Protocols SubcommitteeReport
Councilmembers Krupa and Brown
1

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
The purpose of the City Council Protocols is
to document and formalize the way the
Hemet City Council does business. The
Protocolsserve asaguide formembers of
the public with business before the City
Council and as procedures formembers of
the City Council.

The City
2 Council Protocols
primarily support the Strategic
Plan goal of Organizational
Effectiveness.

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Relevant Strategic Plan Values:  We believe in an open, ho nest, and
representative form of democracy.
 We are dedicated to the highest ideals of
honor and integrity in order to merit the
respect, trust and confidence of the citizens
of Hemet.
 We believe our primary responsibility is to
those who live, work, visit or otherwise
come in contact with our City.
3

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
City Council Protocols Preamble
“The City Council for the City of Hemet
declares that residents, businesses, and City
staff of Hemet are entitled to have fair, open,
ethical, efficient
government and Cityofficialsshould
continually strive
andaccountable local
that
to earn the public’s
confidence. Accordingly, Members of the City
Council must pledge to hold themselves and
each other responsible for observing the
standards set forth in these Protocols, and to
enforce these Protocols when necessary to
preserve the integrity of City government or
the public’s image of the City.”
4

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
City Council Protocols Outline

1. Definitions

2. Setting a Higher Standard

3. Openness

4. Fairness of Process

5. Agenda Preparation

6. Council Committees

7. Appointments

8. Councilmember Administrative Support
5

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
City Council Protocols Outline

9. Use of City Resources and Personnel

10. Use of City Council Chambers

11. Community Relations and Policies

12. Ethical Decision-making

13. Efficiency andAccountability

14. Interaction of Members

15. Enforcement

16. Failure to Observe Council Protocols
Appendixes
6

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Setting a Higher Standard
Section2
“Byadopting these Protocols, the City
Council and each of its Members intends to
and not
existing
to supersede
legal framework
supplement
California’s
applicable to local governments. Similarly,
the City Council intends that these Protocols
will not existing
obligations,
merely restate
but will establish
legal
a higher
standard ofconductforMembers in the
governance of the City…”
7

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Openness
Section3

3.1 Public Meetingsshall becompliant
with the BrownAct

3.2 Serial Meetings are prohibited

3.3 Closed Session Discussionsshall
beconfidential and held in
accordance with the Brown Act
8

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Fairness
Section4

4.1Membersshall base their decisions
on the facts and merits of the matter

4.2 Once an application for approval ofa
Development Project has been filed,
Members may only meet with person
pursuingthe project ata noticed
directed by the Council, or in
presence of the City
Manager
public meeting of the Council, as the
or
designee.
9

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Fairness
Section4

4.3 Membersshall disclose meetings,
site visits, and independent research
related toDevelopment Project
approvals before the City Council.

4.4 Members shall preserve fairness and
integrity by ensuring decorum during
City Council deliberations
10

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Fairness
Section4

4.5 Rosenberg’s Rules of
adopted as theCity
Order is
Council’s
parliamentary procedure

4.6 Quasi-judicial hearings (which
includes most Development Project
hearings)
attached
are rulesgoverned bythe
regarding Quasi-
judicial hearings
11

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Agenda Preparation
Section5
Only the followingmay place items on City
Council agendas:

The City Council (5.4)
The Mayor (5.3)
The City Manager (5.2)
Council Subcommittees (5.5)
Individual members may not place items on
the City Council agenda (5.6)
12

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Council Committees
Section6
The City Council establishes Council
Committees (6.1) and the Mayor appoints
Members to the Council Committee (6.1.1)
Council Committeesshall report on their
progress each month to the entire Council
(6.1.1)andshall transmit their
recommendations to the City Council (6.2).

The City Managermayassign staff to
support Committees as resources allow (6.3)
13

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Appointments
Section7
The Mayor appoints Members to the boards
of other public agencies(7.1) while keeping
in mind the best interests of the City,a fair
distribution of assignments, and any specific
knowledge held by individual Members
Each Member of the City Council shall have
theability to applications for,
interview,and for City Council
review
nominate
ratification one member of each City
Commission
14

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Appointments – MeasureU
Section7
Following each general election, the City
Council willseta date for interviews and
appointment to the MeasureU Citizen
Oversight Committee.

The City Clerk will post a public notice with a
deadline at least 30 days before the
scheduled meeting soliciting applications to
the MeasureU Committee. The applications
will be provided to each Member of the City
Council at least 14 days before the meeting.
15

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Appointments – MeasureU
Section7
The City Council shall interview each
applicant, after which, each Member shall
individually rank the applicants
Thehighest ranked applicant from each
Membershall be deemednominated, thus
ensuring that each Member has an
opportunity to nominate one person of their
choice. In the event two Members ranked the
same person first, either Member may
choose to nominate their second-highest
applicant until there are5 nominees
16

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Appointments – MeasureU
Section7
For the remaining2 MeasureU Committee
seats, the two applicants with the highest
average rank among all Members, who were
not otherwise nominated earlier, will be
deemed nominated
The CityCouncil will vote toapprove the
nominees. If any nominee is not approved by
the City Council, then anyMembermay
nominate another person until7 persons
meetingthe residency requirements of
Measure U have are appointed
17

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Appointments – Vacancies
Section7
Should any seat on the City Council become
vacant, the City Clerkshall notify the
Members and publisha publicnotice
soliciting applications for a period of 30 days
Following the application deadline, the Mayor
shall calla special meeting of the City
Council to consider the appointment of an
applicant to the vacated seat
18

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Administrative Support
Section8
Correspondence received will be processed
by staff unlessmarked personal or
confidential (8.1.1)
Correspondence from Members shall state
either the City Council’s adopted position on a matter, or clearly identify that this is the Member’s personal opinion or position (8.1.2)
20

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Administrative Support
Section8
Correspondence sent to the City generally
and related to Non-Agenda items will be
routed to City staff to draft a response (8.1.4)
Correspondencesent to the City generally
and related to Agenda items will be routed to
the City Clerk for incorporated into the
forthcoming meeting agenda packet(8.1.4)
Correspondence addressed to the Council or a Member will be routed to the Council or Member(8.1.4)
20

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Administrative Support
Section8
The Mayor is the spokesperson for the City
of Hemet and shall make representations on
behalf of the Council and sign letters
representing theofficial position of the City
(8.2.1)
Members shall only use City letterhead and
the City Seal/Logo for official City business (8.2.2 and 8.2.3). Such correspondence will be copied to the entire Council.(8.2.5)
21

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Administrative Support
Section8
Members will be provided with non-City
letterhead stationaryforcommunications,
whichshall be mailed at the personal
expense of the Member (8.2.6)
The City Manager will prepare draft position
letters for the City Council when the Council
is asked to take an official position, for
Council approval ata subsequent meeting
(8.2.8) unless the matter is one of urgency, in
which case the Mayor may senda response
(8.2.9)
22

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
City Resources and Personnel
Section9
City resources andpersonnelmay not be
used for personal business (9.2)
Members may request City personnel appear
at outside events directly related to City
business (9.3.1)subject to theapproval of
the City Manager
Members may request the City Manager
direct staff to perform research or the City
Attorney perform research(9.3.2 and9.3.3)
23

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
City Council Chambers Use
Section 10
The City Council may designate any place
within its jurisdiction as the official Council
Chambers and their regular meeting place (10.1)
The Council Chambers may be used for
educational election forums, but shall not be
used for political or commercial purposes.
(10.2)
24

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
City Council Chambers Use
Section 10
City broadcasting capability shall be limited
to City Council, Planning Commission,
Advisory Bodies, and City-related emergency
or informational purposes (10.4)
25

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Community Relations
Section 11
The Mayor shall act as the ceremonial
representative of the City at public events (11.1) and if not available, the Mayor Pro Tem or any Member appointed by the Mayor
Proclamations may be requested and issued
by the City Council. Unique proclamations
should be requested at least4 weeks before
the Council meeting and routine
proclamations may be requested with less
time
26

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Community Relations
Section 11
Members participating in non-City organized
or sponsored events or organizations should
be clear that they are participating in their
individualcapacity and not asa
representative of the City of Hemet.
27

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Ethical Decision-making
Section 12
Incorporates “Guidelines for Making Ethical
Decisions”
Encourages nonparticipation for bothactual
and perceived conflicts
Includes prohibition on Members participating
in decisions that affecta contractor or vendor
that has madea campaign contribution to the
Member
28

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Efficiency and Accountability
Section 13 Members
are prohibited from interfering in
theexecutive operations of
government, including directing
the City
staff to
perform tasks or directing the City Manager
related to personnel matters
30

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Interactions of Members
Section 14
Mayor is the Presiding Officer of the Council
and responsible for maintaining order and
decorum, as well as the City’s ceremonial
head of government and spokesman
Members shall maintain decorum at Council
meetings, dress professionally,andkeep
discussions on topic
Members shall only use their titles when conducting official City business or for background/expertise purposes
30

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Enforcement
Section 15
Members
theyhave
shall
read
signa statement
and understood
affirming
the City
Protocols
The Council is responsible for monitoring and
take corrective action, including removal of an
offending Member from committees and other
governmental boards
31

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Enforcement
Section 15
Any personmay makeacomplaint that a
Memberhas violated the Council Protocols,
whichshall be investigated by the City
Manager
The City Manager shall report their findings to
the City Council fora determination. The
Council may dismiss the complaint, issuea
warning, reprimand the offending Member, or
(in the most serious cases) censure the
Member
32

6.A

City
Council
Protocols
Report
Failure to Observe
Section 16
The Council Protocols are procedural only
and the failure of the Council to adhere to the
Protocols will not invalidate any action taken,
nor providea private right of action
33

6.A

Discussion
& Follow-up

34

6.A

Rosenberg’s Rules of Order
REVISED 2011
Simple Rules of Parliamentary Procedure for the 21st Century By Judge Dave Rosenberg

6.A

ii
MISSION and CORE BELIEFS
To expand and protect local control for cities through education and advocacy to enhance the quality of life for all Californians.

VISION
To be recognized and respected as the leading advocate for the common interests of California’s cities.

About the League of California Cities
Established in 1898, the League of California Cities is a member organization that represents California’s incorporated cities.

The League strives to protect the local authority and automony of city government and help California’s cities effectively serve their residents. In addition to advocating on cities’ behalf at the state capitol, the League provides its members with professional development programs and information resources, conducts education conferences and research, and publishes Western City magazine.
© 2011 League of California Cities. All rights reserved.

About the Author
Dave Rosenberg is a Superior Court Judge in Yolo County. He has served as presiding judge of his court, and as presiding judge of the Superior Court Appellate Division. He also has served as chair of the Trial Court Presiding Judges Advisory Committee (the committee composed of all 58 California presiding judges) and as an advisory member of the California Judicial Council. Prior to his appointment to the bench, Rosenberg was member of the Yolo County Board of Supervisors, where he served two terms as chair. Rosenberg also served on the Davis City Council, including two terms as mayor. He has served on the senior staff of two governors, and worked for 19 years in private law practice. Rosenberg has served as a member and chair of numerous state, regional and local boards. Rosenberg chaired the California State Lottery Commission, the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, the Yolo County Economic Development Commission, and the Yolo County Criminal Justice Cabinet. For many years, he has taught classes on parliamentary procedure and has served as parliamentarian for large and small bodies.

6.A

1 Table of Contents
About the Author............................................................................................................ii Introduction....................................................................................................................2 Establishing a Quorum...................................................................................................2 The Role of the Chair......................................................................................................2 The Basic Format for an Agenda Item Discussion........................................................2 Motions in General.........................................................................................................3 The Three Basic Motions................................................................................................3 Multiple Motions Before the Body.................................................................................4 To Debate or Not to Debate............................................................................................4 Majority and Super-Majority Votes ...............................................................................5 Counting Votes................................................................................................................5 The Motion to Reconsider..............................................................................................6 Courtesy and Decorum ..................................................................................................7 Special Notes About Public Input..................................................................................7

6.A

2 Establishing a Quorum
The starting point for a meeting is the establishment of a quorum.

A quorum is defined as the minimum number of members of the body who must be present at a meeting for business to be legally transacted. The default rule is that a quorum is one more than half the body. For example, in a five-member body a quorum is three.

When the body has three members present, it can legally transact business. If the body has less than a quorum of members present, it cannot legally transact business. And even if the body has a quorum to begin the meeting, the body can lose the quorum during the meeting when a member departs (or even when a member leaves the dais). When that occurs the body loses its ability to transact business until and unless a quorum is reestablished.

The default rule, identified above, however, gives way to a specific rule of the body that establishes a quorum. For example, the rules of a particular five-member body may indicate that a quorum is four members for that particular body. The body must follow the rules it has established for its quorum. In the absence of such a specific rule, the quorum is one more than half the members of the body.

The Role of the Chair
While all members of the body should know and understand the rules of parliamentary procedure, it is the chair of the body who is charged with applying the rules of conduct of the meeting. The chair should be well versed in those rules. For all intents and purposes, the chair makes the final ruling on the rules every time the chair states an action. In fact, all decisions by the chair are final unless overruled by the body itself.

Since the chair runs the conduct of the meeting, it is usual courtesy for the chair to play a less active role in the debate and discussion than other members of the body. This does not mean that the chair should not participate in the debate or discussion. To the contrary, as a member of the body, the chair has the full right to participate in the debate, discussion and decision-making of the body. What the chair should do, however, is strive to be the last to speak at the discussion and debate stage. The chair should not make or second a motion unless the chair is convinced that no other member of the body will do so at that point in time.

The Basic Format for an Agenda Item Discussion
Formal meetings normally have a written, often published agenda.

Informal meetings may have only an oral or understood agenda. In either case, the meeting is governed by the agenda and the agenda constitutes the body’s agreed-upon roadmap for the meeting. Each agenda item can be handled by the chair in the following basic format:

Introduction
The rules of procedure at meetings should be simple enough for most people to understand. Unfortunately, that has not always been the case. Virtually all clubs, associations, boards, councils and bodies follow a set of rules — Robert’s Rules of Order — which are embodied in a small, but complex, book. Virtually no one I know has actually read this book cover to cover. Worse yet, the book was written for another time and for another purpose. If one is chairing or running a parliament, then Robert’s Rules of Order is a dandy and quite useful handbook for procedure in that complex setting. On the other hand, if one is running a meeting of say, a five-member body with a few members of the public in attendance, a simplified version of the rules of parliamentary procedure is in order.

Hence, the birth of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order.

What follows is my version of the rules of parliamentary procedure, based on my decades of experience chairing meetings in state and local government. These rules have been simplified for the smaller bodies we chair or in which we participate, slimmed down for the 21st Century, yet retaining the basic tenets of order to which we have grown accustomed. Interestingly enough, Rosenberg’s Rules has found a welcoming audience. Hundreds of cities, counties, special districts, committees, boards, commissions, neighborhood associations and private corporations and companies have adopted Rosenberg’s Rules in lieu of Robert’s Rules because they have found them practical, logical, simple, easy to learn and user friendly.

This treatise on modern parliamentary procedure is built on a foundation supported by the following four pillars:

1. Rules should establish order. The first purpose of rules of parliamentary procedure is to establish a framework for the orderly conduct of meetings.

2. Rules should be clear. Simple rules lead to wider understanding and participation. Complex rules create two classes: those who understand and participate; and those who do not fully understand and do not fully participate.

3. Rules should be user friendly. That is, the rules must be simple enough that the public is invited into the body and feels that it has participated in the process.

4. Rules should enforce the will of the majority while protecting the rights of the minority. The ultimate purpose of rules of procedure is to encourage discussion and to facilitate decision making by the body. In a democracy, majority rules. The rules must enable the majority to express itself and fashion a result, while permitting the minority to also express itself, but not dominate, while fully participating in the process.

6.A

3 Ninth, the chair takes a vote. Simply asking for the “ayes” and then asking for the “nays” normally does this. If members of the body do not vote, then they “abstain.” Unless the rules of the body provide otherwise (or unless a super majority is required as delineated later in these rules), then a simple majority (as defined in law or the rules of the body as delineated later in these rules) determines whether the motion passes or is defeated.

Tenth, the chair should announce the result of the vote and what action (if any) the body has taken. In announcing the result, the chair should indicate the names of the members of the body, if any, who voted in the minority on the motion. This announcement might take the following form: “The motion passes by a vote of 3-2, with Smith and Jones dissenting. We have passed the motion requiring a 10-day notice for all future meetings of this body.”
Motions in General
Motions are the vehicles for decision making by a body. It is usually best to have a motion before the body prior to commencing discussion of an agenda item. This helps the body focus.

Motions are made in a simple two-step process. First, the chair should recognize the member of the body. Second, the member of the body makes a motion by preceding the member’s desired approach with the words “I move … ”
A typical motion might be: “I move that we give a 10-day notice in the future for all our meetings.”
The chair usually initiates the motion in one of three ways:

1. Inviting the members of the body to make a motion, for example, “A motion at this time would be in order.”

2. Suggesting a motion to the members of the body, “A motion would be in order that we give a 10-day notice in the future for all our meetings.”

3. Making the motion. As noted, the chair has every right as a member of the body to make a motion, but should normally do so only if the chair wishes to make a motion on an item but is convinced that no other member of the body is willing to step forward to do so at a particular time.

The Three Basic Motions
There are three motions that are the most common and recur often at meetings:

The basic motion. The basic motion is the one that puts forward a decision for the body’s consideration. A basic motion might be: “I move that we create a five-member committee to plan and put on our annual fundraiser.”
First, the chair should clearly announce the agenda item number and should clearly state what the agenda item subject is. The chair should then announce the format (which follows) that will be followed in considering the agenda item.

Second, following that agenda format, the chair should invite the appropriate person or persons to report on the item, including any recommendation that they might have. The appropriate person or persons may be the chair, a member of the body, a staff person, or a committee chair charged with providing input on the agenda item.

Third, the chair should ask members of the body if they have any technical questions of clarification. At this point, members of the body may ask clarifying questions to the person or persons who reported on the item, and that person or persons should be given time to respond.

Fourth, the chair should invite public comments, or if appropriate at a formal meeting, should open the public meeting for public input.

If numerous members of the public indicate a desire to speak to the subject, the chair may limit the time of public speakers. At the conclusion of the public comments, the chair should announce that public input has concluded (or the public hearing, as the case may be, is closed).

Fifth, the chair should invite a motion. The chair should announce the name of the member of the body who makes the motion.

Sixth, the chair should determine if any member of the body wishes to second the motion. The chair should announce the name of the member of the body who seconds the motion. It is normally good practice for a motion to require a second before proceeding to ensure that it is not just one member of the body who is interested in a particular approach. However, a second is not an absolute requirement, and the chair can proceed with consideration and vote on a motion even when there is no second. This is a matter left to the discretion of the chair.

Seventh, if the motion is made and seconded, the chair should make sure everyone understands the motion.

This is done in one of three ways:

1. The chair can ask the maker of the motion to repeat it;

2. The chair can repeat the motion; or

3. The chair can ask the secretary or the clerk of the body to repeat the motion.

Eighth, the chair should now invite discussion of the motion by the body. If there is no desired discussion, or after the discussion has ended, the chair should announce that the body will vote on the motion. If there has been no discussion or very brief discussion, then the vote on the motion should proceed immediately and there is no need to repeat the motion. If there has been substantial discussion, then it is normally best to make sure everyone understands the motion by repeating it.

6.A

4 First, the chair would deal with the third (the last) motion on the floor, the substitute motion. After discussion and debate, a vote would be taken first on the third motion. If the substitute motion passed, it would be a substitute for the basic motion and would eliminate it. The first motion would be moot, as would the second motion (which sought to amend the first motion), and the action on the agenda item would be completed on the passage by the body of the third motion (the substitute motion). No vote would be taken on the first or second motions.

Second, if the substitute motion failed, the chair would then deal with the second (now the last) motion on the floor, the motion to amend. The discussion and debate would focus strictly on the amendment (should the committee be five or 10 members). If the motion to amend passed, the chair would then move to consider the main motion (the first motion) as amended. If the motion to amend failed, the chair would then move to consider the main motion (the first motion) in its original format, not amended.

Third, the chair would now deal with the first motion that was placed on the floor. The original motion would either be in its original format (five-member committee), or if amended, would be in its amended format (10-member committee). The question on the floor for discussion and decision would be whether a committee should plan and put on the annual fundraiser.

To Debate or Not to Debate
The basic rule of motions is that they are subject to discussion and debate. Accordingly, basic motions, motions to amend, and substitute motions are all eligible, each in their turn, for full discussion before and by the body. The debate can continue as long as members of the body wish to discuss an item, subject to the decision of the chair that it is time to move on and take action.

There are exceptions to the general rule of free and open debate on motions. The exceptions all apply when there is a desire of the body to move on. The following motions are not debatable (that is, when the following motions are made and seconded, the chair must immediately call for a vote of the body without debate on the motion):

Motion to adjourn. This motion, if passed, requires the body to immediately adjourn to its next regularly scheduled meeting. It requires a simple majority vote.

Motion to recess. This motion, if passed, requires the body to immediately take a recess. Normally, the chair determines the length of the recess which may be a few minutes or an hour. It requires a simple majority vote.

Motion to fix the time to adjourn. This motion, if passed, requires the body to adjourn the meeting at the specific time set in the motion. For example, the motion might be: “I move we adjourn this meeting at midnight.” It requires a simple majority vote.

The motion to amend. If a member wants to change a basic motion that is before the body, they would move to amend it. A motion to amend might be: “I move that we amend the motion to have a 10-member committee.” A motion to amend takes the basic motion that is before the body and seeks to change it in some way.

The substitute motion. If a member wants to completely do away with the basic motion that is before the body, and put a new motion before the body, they would move a substitute motion. A substitute motion might be: “I move a substitute motion that we cancel the annual fundraiser this year.”
“Motions to amend” and “substitute motions” are often confused, but they are quite different, and their effect (if passed) is quite different.

A motion to amend seeks to retain the basic motion on the floor, but modify it in some way. A substitute motion seeks to throw out the basic motion on the floor, and substitute a new and different motion for it. The decision as to whether a motion is really a “motion to amend” or a “substitute motion” is left to the chair. So if a member makes what that member calls a “motion to amend,” but the chair determines that it is really a “substitute motion,” then the chair’s designation governs.

A “friendly amendment” is a practical parliamentary tool that is simple, informal, saves time and avoids bogging a meeting down with numerous formal motions. It works in the following way: In the discussion on a pending motion, it may appear that a change to the motion is desirable or may win support for the motion from some members. When that happens, a member who has the floor may simply say, “I want to suggest a friendly amendment to the motion.” The member suggests the friendly amendment, and if the maker and the person who seconded the motion pending on the floor accepts the friendly amendment, that now becomes the pending motion on the floor. If either the maker or the person who seconded rejects the proposed friendly amendment, then the proposer can formally move to amend.

Multiple Motions Before the Body
There can be up to three motions on the floor at the same time.

The chair can reject a fourth motion until the chair has dealt with the three that are on the floor and has resolved them. This rule has practical value. More than three motions on the floor at any given time is confusing and unwieldy for almost everyone, including the chair.

When there are two or three motions on the floor (after motions and seconds) at the same time, the vote should proceed first on the last motion that is made. For example, assume the first motion is a basic “motion to have a five-member committee to plan and put on our annual fundraiser.” During the discussion of this motion, a member might make a second motion to “amend the main motion to have a 10-member committee, not a five-member committee to plan and put on our annual fundraiser.” And perhaps, during that discussion, a member makes yet a third motion as a “substitute motion that we not have an annual fundraiser this year.” The proper procedure would be as follows:

6.A

5 Motion to close nominations. When choosing officers of the body (such as the chair), nominations are in order either from a nominating committee or from the floor of the body. A motion to close nominations effectively cuts off the right of the minority to nominate officers and it requires a two-thirds vote to pass.

Motion to object to the consideration of a question. Normally, such a motion is unnecessary since the objectionable item can be tabled or defeated straight up. However, when members of a body do not even want an item on the agenda to be considered, then such a motion is in order. It is not debatable, and it requires a two-thirds vote to pass.

Motion to suspend the rules. This motion is debatable, but requires a two-thirds vote to pass. If the body has its own rules of order, conduct or procedure, this motion allows the body to suspend the rules for a particular purpose. For example, the body (a private club) might have a rule prohibiting the attendance at meetings by non-club members. A motion to suspend the rules would be in order to allow a non-club member to attend a meeting of the club on a particular date or on a particular agenda item.

Counting Votes
The matter of counting votes starts simple, but can become complicated.

Usually, it’s pretty easy to determine whether a particular motion passed or whether it was defeated. If a simple majority vote is needed to pass a motion, then one vote more than 50 percent of the body is required. For example, in a five-member body, if the vote is three in favor and two opposed, the motion passes. If it is two in favor and three opposed, the motion is defeated.

If a two-thirds majority vote is needed to pass a motion, then how many affirmative votes are required? The simple rule of thumb is to count the “no” votes and double that count to determine how many “yes” votes are needed to pass a particular motion. For example, in a seven-member body, if two members vote “no” then the “yes” vote of at least four members is required to achieve a two-thirds majority vote to pass the motion.

What about tie votes? In the event of a tie, the motion always fails since an affirmative vote is required to pass any motion. For example, in a five-member body, if the vote is two in favor and two opposed, with one member absent, the motion is defeated.

Vote counting starts to become complicated when members vote “abstain” or in the case of a written ballot, cast a blank (or unreadable) ballot. Do these votes count, and if so, how does one count them? The starting point is always to check the statutes.

In California, for example, for an action of a board of supervisors to be valid and binding, the action must be approved by a majority of the board. (California Government Code Section 25005.) Typically, this means three of the five members of the board must vote affirmatively in favor of the action. A vote of 2-1 would not be sufficient. A vote of 3-0 with two abstentions would be sufficient. In general law cities in Motion to table. This motion, if passed, requires discussion of the agenda item to be halted and the agenda item to be placed on “hold.” The motion can contain a specific time in which the item can come back to the body. “I move we table this item until our regular meeting in October.” Or the motion can contain no specific time for the return of the item, in which case a motion to take the item off the table and bring it back to the body will have to be taken at a future meeting. A motion to table an item (or to bring it back to the body) requires a simple majority vote.

Motion to limit debate. The most common form of this motion is to say, “I move the previous question” or “I move the question” or “I call the question” or sometimes someone simply shouts out “question.” As a practical matter, when a member calls out one of these phrases, the chair can expedite matters by treating it as a “request” rather than as a formal motion. The chair can simply inquire of the body, “any further discussion?” If no one wishes to have further discussion, then the chair can go right to the pending motion that is on the floor.

However, if even one person wishes to discuss the pending motion further, then at that point, the chair should treat the call for the “question” as a formal motion, and proceed to it.

When a member of the body makes such a motion (“I move the previous question”), the member is really saying: “I’ve had enough debate. Let’s get on with the vote.” When such a motion is made, the chair should ask for a second, stop debate, and vote on the motion to limit debate. The motion to limit debate requires a two-thirds vote of the body.

Note: A motion to limit debate could include a time limit. For example: “I move we limit debate on this agenda item to 15 minutes.” Even in this format, the motion to limit debate requires a twothirds vote of the body. A similar motion is a motion to object to consideration of an item. This motion is not debatable, and if passed, precludes the body from even considering an item on the agenda. It also requires a two-thirds vote.

Majority and Super Majority Votes
In a democracy, a simple majority vote determines a question. A tie vote means the motion fails. So in a seven-member body, a vote of 4-3 passes the motion. A vote of 3-3 with one abstention means the motion fails. If one member is absent and the vote is 3-3, the motion still fails.

All motions require a simple majority, but there are a few exceptions.

The exceptions come up when the body is taking an action which effectively cuts off the ability of a minority of the body to take an action or discuss an item. These extraordinary motions require a two-thirds majority (a super majority) to pass:

Motion to limit debate. Whether a member says, “I move the previous question,” or “I move the question,” or “I call the question,” or “I move to limit debate,” it all amounts to an attempt to cut off the ability of the minority to discuss an item, and it requires a two-thirds vote to pass.

6.A

6 Now, exactly how does a member cast an “abstention” vote? Any time a member votes “abstain” or says, “I abstain,” that is an abstention. However, if a member votes “present” that is also treated as an abstention (the member is essentially saying, “Count me for purposes of a quorum, but my vote on the issue is abstain.”) In fact, any manifestation of intention not to vote either “yes” or “no” on the pending motion may be treated by the chair as an abstention. If written ballots are cast, a blank or unreadable ballot is counted as an abstention as well.

Can a member vote “absent” or “count me as absent?” Interesting question. The ruling on this is up to the chair. The better approach is for the chair to count this as if the member had left his/her chair and is actually “absent.” That, of course, affects the quorum. However, the chair may also treat this as a vote to abstain, particularly if the person does not actually leave the dais.

The Motion to Reconsider
There is a special and unique motion that requires a bit of explanation all by itself; the motion to reconsider. A tenet of parliamentary procedure is finality. After vigorous discussion, debate and a vote, there must be some closure to the issue. And so, after a vote is taken, the matter is deemed closed, subject only to reopening if a proper motion to consider is made and passed.

A motion to reconsider requires a majority vote to pass like other garden-variety motions, but there are two special rules that apply only to the motion to reconsider.

First, is the matter of timing. A motion to reconsider must be made at the meeting where the item was first voted upon. A motion to reconsider made at a later time is untimely. (The body, however, can always vote to suspend the rules and, by a two-thirds majority, allow a motion to reconsider to be made at another time.)
Second, a motion to reconsider may be made only by certain members of the body. Accordingly, a motion to reconsider may be made only by a member who voted in the majority on the original motion. If such a member has a change of heart, he or she may make the motion to reconsider (any other member of the body — including a member who voted in the minority on the original motion — may second the motion). If a member who voted in the minority seeks to make the motion to reconsider, it must be ruled out of order. The purpose of this rule is finality. If a member of minority could make a motion to reconsider, then the item could be brought back to the body again and again, which would defeat the purpose of finality.

If the motion to reconsider passes, then the original matter is back before the body, and a new original motion is in order. The matter may be discussed and debated as if it were on the floor for the first time.

California, as another example, resolutions or orders for the payment of money and all ordinances require a recorded vote of the total members of the city council. (California Government Code Section 36936.) Cities with charters may prescribe their own vote requirements. Local elected officials are always well-advised to consult with their local agency counsel on how state law may affect the vote count.

After consulting state statutes, step number two is to check the rules of the body. If the rules of the body say that you count votes of “those present” then you treat abstentions one way. However, if the rules of the body say that you count the votes of those “present and voting,” then you treat abstentions a different way. And if the rules of the body are silent on the subject, then the general rule of thumb (and default rule) is that you count all votes that are “present and voting.” Accordingly, under the “present and voting” system, you would NOT count abstention votes on the motion. Members who abstain are counted for purposes of determining quorum (they are “present”), but you treat the abstention votes on the motion as if they did not exist (they are not “voting”). On the other hand, if the rules of the body specifically say that you count votes of those “present” then you DO count abstention votes both in establishing the quorum and on the motion. In this event, the abstention votes act just like “no” votes.

How does this work in practice?
Here are a few examples.

Assume that a five-member city council is voting on a motion that requires a simple majority vote to pass, and assume further that the body has no specific rule on counting votes. Accordingly, the default rule kicks in and we count all votes of members that are “present and voting.” If the vote on the motion is 3-2, the motion passes. If the motion is 2-2 with one abstention, the motion fails.

Assume a five-member city council voting on a motion that requires a two-thirds majority vote to pass, and further assume that the body has no specific rule on counting votes. Again, the default rule applies.

If the vote is 3-2, the motion fails for lack of a two-thirds majority. If the vote is 4-1, the motion passes with a clear two-thirds majority. A vote of three “yes,” one “no” and one “abstain” also results in passage of the motion. Once again, the abstention is counted only for the purpose of determining quorum, but on the actual vote on the motion, it is as if the abstention vote never existed — so an effective 3-1 vote is clearly a two-thirds majority vote.

Now, change the scenario slightly. Assume the same five-member city council voting on a motion that requires a two-thirds majority vote to pass, but now assume that the body DOES have a specific rule requiring a two-thirds vote of members “present.” Under this specific rule, we must count the members present not only for quorum but also for the motion. In this scenario, any abstention has the same force and effect as if it were a “no” vote. Accordingly, if the votes were three “yes,” one “no” and one “abstain,” then the motion fails. The abstention in this case is treated like a “no” vote and effective vote of 3-2 is not enough to pass two-thirds majority muster.

6.A

7 Appeal. If the chair makes a ruling that a member of the body disagrees with, that member may appeal the ruling of the chair. If the motion is seconded, and after debate, if it passes by a simple majority vote, then the ruling of the chair is deemed reversed.

Call for orders of the day. This is simply another way of saying, “return to the agenda.” If a member believes that the body has drifted from the agreed-upon agenda, such a call may be made. It does not require a vote, and when the chair discovers that the agenda has not been followed, the chair simply reminds the body to return to the agenda item properly before them. If the chair fails to do so, the chair’s determination may be appealed.

Withdraw a motion. During debate and discussion of a motion, the maker of the motion on the floor, at any time, may interrupt a speaker to withdraw his or her motion from the floor. The motion is immediately deemed withdrawn, although the chair may ask the person who seconded the motion if he or she wishes to make the motion, and any other member may make the motion if properly recognized.

Special Notes About Public Input
The rules outlined above will help make meetings very publicfriendly. But in addition, and particularly for the chair, it is wise to remember three special rules that apply to each agenda item:

Rule One: Tell the public what the body will be doing.

Rule Two: Keep the public informed while the body is doing it.

Rule Three: When the body has acted, tell the public what the body did.

Courtesy and Decorum
The rules of order are meant to create an atmosphere where the members of the body and the members of the public can attend to business efficiently, fairly and with full participation. At the same time, it is up to the chair and the members of the body to maintain common courtesy and decorum. Unless the setting is very informal, it is always best for only one person at a time to have the floor, and it is always best for every speaker to be first recognized by the chair before proceeding to speak.

The chair should always ensure that debate and discussion of an agenda item focuses on the item and the policy in question, not the personalities of the members of the body. Debate on policy is healthy, debate on personalities is not. The chair has the right to cut off discussion that is too personal, is too loud, or is too crude.

Debate and discussion should be focused, but free and open. In the interest of time, the chair may, however, limit the time allotted to speakers, including members of the body.

Can a member of the body interrupt the speaker? The general rule is “no.” There are, however, exceptions. A speaker may be interrupted for the following reasons:

Privilege. The proper interruption would be, “point of privilege.” The chair would then ask the interrupter to “state your point.” Appropriate points of privilege relate to anything that would interfere with the normal comfort of the meeting. For example, the room may be too hot or too cold, or a blowing fan might interfere with a person’s ability to hear.

Order. The proper interruption would be, “point of order.” Again, the chair would ask the interrupter to “state your point.” Appropriate points of order relate to anything that would not be considered appropriate conduct of the meeting. For example, if the chair moved on to a vote on a motion that permits debate without allowing that discussion or debate.

6.A

1400 K Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 658-8200 | Fax (916) 658-8240
www.cacities.org
To order additional copies of this publication, call (916) 658-8200. $10
© 2011 League of California Cities. All rights reserved.

Printed on recycled paper.

6.A

City Council
Protocols
City of Hemet

6.A

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
-i1. DEFINED TERMS.................................................................................................2

2. SETTING A HIGHER STANDARD WITHIN THE EXISTING
FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................2

3. OPENNESS..........................................................................................................3

3.1 Public Meetings..........................................................................................3

3.2 Council Communications and Serial Meetings...........................................3

3.3 Closed Session Discussions......................................................................3

4. FAIRNESS OF PROCESS ...................................................................................3

4.1 Decisions on the merits..............................................................................3

4.2 Meetings with Applicants and Interested Persons. ....................................3

4.3 Disclose Meetings, Site Visits, and Independent Research.......................4

4.4 Decorum & Debate.....................................................................................4

4.5 Parliamentary Procedure: Rosenberg’s Rules of Order.............................4

4.6 Quasi-Judicial Hearings. ............................................................................5

4.7 Attentiveness at Meetings..........................................................................5

5. AGENDA PREPARATION & PLACING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.....................5

5.1 Preparing the Agenda. ...............................................................................5

5.2 Agency Items – Placement by City Manager. ............................................5

5.3 Agenda Items – Placement by Mayor. .......................................................5

5.4 Agenda Items – Placement by Council. .....................................................6

5.5 Agenda Items – Placement by Council Committee....................................6

5.6 Agenda Items – Placement by Individual Members...................................6

5.7 Consultation Regarding the Draft and Posted Agendas. ...........................6

5.8 Matters Not Appearing on the Agenda.......................................................7

6. COUNCIL COMMITTEES.....................................................................................7

6.1 Purpose......................................................................................................7

6.2 Committee Recommendations...................................................................8

6.3 Staffing.......................................................................................................8

7. APPOINTMENTS..................................................................................................8

7.1 Appointments by Mayor to Other Public Agencies.....................................8

7.2 Appointments by Council to City Commissions..........................................9

6.A

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
-ii7.3 Measure U Citizen Oversight Committee.................................................10

7.4 City Council Vacancies ............................................................................11

8. COUNCIL MEMBER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT .........................................12

8.1 Processing Correspondence....................................................................12

8.2 Council Correspondence..........................................................................13

9. USE OF CITY PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT OR RESOURCES.........................14

9.1 Overview. .................................................................................................14

9.2 Use of City Resources. ............................................................................14

9.3 City Manager Authorization......................................................................15

10. USE OF CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS...............................................................16

10.1 Primary Purpose. .....................................................................................16

10.2 Calendar...................................................................................................16

10.3 Parameters...............................................................................................16

10.4 City-Owned and Operated Television and Broadcasting Capability. .......17

11. COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND POLICIES ......................................................17

11.1 Mayor to Act as Council Ceremonial Representative...............................17

11.2 Honoring Residents and Other Worthy Persons......................................17

11.3 Council Member Participation in Community Activities............................18

12. ETHICAL DECISION MAKING ...........................................................................19

12.1 Avoiding the Appearance of Impropriety..................................................19

12.2 Ethical Principles to Follow. .....................................................................19

13. EFFICIENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY..............................................................22

13.1 Members Shall Not Interfere with Operations. .........................................22

13.2 Stay Out of Personnel Matters.................................................................22

13.3 Orders and Direction to Employees. ........................................................22

13.4 Staff Liaisons to City Commissions / Committees and Outside Agencies. .................................................................................................23

13.5 Operations and Service Levels. ...............................................................23

13.6 Political Solicitation and Activities. ...........................................................23

14. INTERACTION OF MEMBERS ..........................................................................23

6.A

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
-iii14.1 Mayor. ......................................................................................................23

14.2 At Public Meetings. ..................................................................................24

14.3 Relations with Fellow Members. ..............................................................25

14.4 Public Communication and Appearance..................................................26

15. ENFORCEMENT ................................................................................................26

15.1 Member Responsibility.............................................................................26

15.2 Council Authority......................................................................................27

15.3 Violation of Oath of Office or the Law. .....................................................27

15.4 Violation of Protocols. ..............................................................................27

16. FAILURE TO OBSERVE COUNCIL PROTOCOLS............................................29 APPENDIX A – LEGAL FRAMEWORK & RESOURCES................................................1 APPENDIX B – GUIDELINES FOR MAKING ETHICAL DECISIONS.............................1 APPENDIX C – ROSENBERG’S RULES OF ORDER....................................................1 APPENDIX D – EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR CITY COUNCIL ..........................1 APPENDIX E – Procedural Rules for Quasi-Judicial Hearings .......................................2

6.A

PREAMBLE
The City Council for the City of Hemet (“City”) declares that residents, businesses, and City staff of Hemet are entitled to have fair, open, ethical, efficient and accountable local government and that City officials should continually strive to earn the public’s confidence. Accordingly, Members of the City Council must pledge to hold themselves and each other responsible for observing the standards set forth in these Protocols, and to enforce these Protocols when necessary to preserve the integrity of City government or the public’s image of the City.

6.A

1. DEFINED TERMS
“Brown Act” means the California Ralph M. Brown Act; Sections 54950 – 54963 of Chapter 9, of Part I of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code as the Act or any of its sections or subparts may be amended from time to time. “City” means the municipal corporation and general law city incorporated as the City of Hemet, California.
“Council” means the City Council of the City of Hemet, acting through a majority of its Membership.
“Development Project” means those projects seeking or requiring a Specific Plan, Zone Change, Development Agreement, Density Bonus, Subdivision Tract Map, or a Conditional Use Permit for a sensitive use (i.e. adult business, massage parlor, etc.), or an industrial or commercial use having a building area of 20,000 square feet or more.
“FPPC” means the Fair Political Practices Commission established pursuant to Government Code Section 83100 et seq.
“FPPC Regulations” mean the rules and regulations promulgated by the FPPC to implement the Political Reform Act: Sections 18109—18997 of Division 6 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations.
“Members” mean all Members of the Council collectively. “Member” means each Member of the Council individually. “Political Reform Act” means the California Political Reform Act of 1974; Sections 81000 – 91014 of Title 9 of the California Government Code. “Serial Meeting” means a series of communications of any kind, by a majority of Councilmembers, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, as prohibited under Government Code section 59952.2.

2. SETTING A HIGHER STANDARD WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAMEWORK By adopting these Protocols, the City Council and each of its Members intends to supplement and not to supersede California’s existing legal framework applicable to local governments. Similarly, the City Council intends that these Protocols will not merely restate existing legal obligations, but will establish a higher standard of conduct for Members in the governance of the City. Members are referred to Appendix “A” (Legal Framework & Resources) for pertinent resources. Members are expected to be familiar with and to seek guidance about the applicability of the legal framework.

6.A

3. OPENNESS
Openness or transparency in decision making is of the utmost importance in maintaining ethical, representative local governance. Members shall adhere to the following standards:

3.1 Public Meetings.

Members shall make it a priority to hold public meetings in accordance with the Brown Act. Members shall seek guidance from the City Attorney as to the accepted interpretation of Brown Act requirements and shall apply those provisions broadly in favor of the public’s right to participate in public decisions.

3.2 Council Communications and Serial Meetings.

Communications between Members shall be conducted in accordance with the Brown Act. Members shall not engage in “serial meetings” with colleagues – a discussion of City issues among a majority of Members either collectively (i.e., all meeting together) or in a sequence (A talks to B who talks to C). Members shall not use other persons as intermediaries to accomplish a serial meeting or to circumvent the Ralph M. Brown Act.

3.3 Closed Session Discussions.

As part of a properly agendized meeting, Members may only hold sessions closed to the public, at advisement of the City Attorney, in accordance with the commonly accepted interpretation of Brown Act requirements. Discussions held in closed session are to be directly limited to the matter at hand. Such discussions, along with materials reviewed, are confidential and shall not be disclosed except as the City Attorney may advise.

4. FAIRNESS OF PROCESS
Members shall comply with the meeting and hearing procedures set forth by Council Ordinance or Resolution. Additionally, in order to cultivate an environment of fairness and to encourage public confidence in City decisions, Members shall adhere to the following standards of conduct:

4.1 Decisions on the merits.

Members shall base their decisions on the facts and merits of each matter, not upon personal or other biases, and shall strive to make decisions that are in the best interests of the community as a whole.

4.2 Meetings with Applicants and Interested Persons.

Except as provided below, a Member may meet and/or communicate with any person interested in a Development Project at any time before or after the filing

6.A

of an application for the Development Project. All meetings and communications must be in compliance with the Brown Act.

After an application for an approval or permit has been filed with the City relating to the Development Project, Members shall only meet and communicate with the project applicant and/or owners (including their agents, representatives and contractors) with regard to the Development Project as part of a noticed and agendized Council meeting, as may otherwise be directed by Council (e.g., at an ad hoc Committee meeting), or in the presence of the City Manager or his/her designee.

4.3 Disclose Meetings, Site Visits, and Independent Research.

Prior to any Council deliberations regarding a Development Project at a noticed Council meeting, Members shall publicly disclose information about the Development Project that they have obtained from sources other than those presented in the staff report. For example, Members should disclose meetings with the project owner, property owner and/or applicant, the Members own site visit, communications received from members of the public, or interested parties concerning the project. Disclosure is required to provide for transparent decision making and to share information the other Members and the public that may influence their decision or that of Members.

4.4 Decorum & Debate.

To ensure the fairness and integrity of the deliberative process, the presiding officer shall preserve decorum and conduct meetings in an orderly manner consistent with Council Resolution 4545, as it may be amended, or repealed and replaced, from time to time.

Members are encouraged to ask probing questions, engage in debate, and challenge assertions where necessary in making decisions. However, Members agree to conduct themselves in a manner that is civil, polite and respectful, exhibiting courtesy and respect to their fellow Members and the public. Members shall refrain from unnecessarily interrupting speakers and shall not engage in abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other Members, City staff and/or the public.

4.5 Parliamentary Procedure: Rosenberg’s Rules of Order.

Except as may otherwise be adopted by Council or as may otherwise be provided by applicable provisions of state law or federal law or the State or Federal Constitutions, the conduct of Council meetings shall be governed by the system of parliamentary procedures set forth in the latest revised edition of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order. Irregularities or mistakes in the application or practice of such order or parliamentary procedures in general shall not invalidate an otherwise legal decision or action of the Council. Members are referred to Rosenberg’s Rules appended hereto as Appendix “C” for reference.

6.A

4.6 Quasi-Judicial Hearings.

Except as may otherwise be adopted by Council or as may otherwise be provided by applicable provisions of state law or federal law or the State or Federal Constitutions, the conduct of quasi-judicial hearings shall be governed by the rules set forth in Appendix “E” attached hereto.

4.7 Attentiveness at Meetings.

Members shall remain attentive to the business at hand at Council and Committee meetings. Members shall not communicate via phone calls, text messages or e-mails from the dais regarding any matter that is currently being considered by the Council. Members shall place cell-phones and other communication devices in “off” or “silent” mode unless being used to review the agenda, staff reports or other pertinent information. Members shall refrain from side-bar conversations with other Members while at the dais.

5. AGENDA PREPARATION & PLACING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA

5.1 Preparing the Agenda.

The Brown Act requires that no action may be taken by Council outside of a properly noticed and agendized public meeting. The City shall adhere to the requirements of the Brown Act in noticing Meetings and in preparing, posting and providing agendas for Council meetings. Prior to agenda posting, a draft agenda shall be prepared by the City Manager and City Clerk in consultation with the City Attorney and the City’s Department Heads.

5.2 Agency Items – Placement by City Manager.

Subject to the authority reserved to the Council in 5.4, below, the Council authorizes the City Manager to prepare and place such items on the agenda for each Council meeting, whether regular, special or emergency, as the City Manager reasonably determines to be necessary for the orderly management and operation of the City. The City Manager shall also have authority to remove items from the agenda or to reschedule items to subsequent Council meetings.

5.3 Agenda Items – Placement by Mayor.

Subject to the authority reserved to Council in Section 5.4 below and the authority of the City Council as a whole to control its agenda, the Council authorizes the Mayor to place such items on the agenda for each Council meeting, whether regular, special or emergency, as the Mayor reasonably determines to be necessary for consideration by Council. The Mayor shall consult with the City Manager in advance of the agenda publication deadline regarding such items to ensure they are ready for Council discussion, do not unduly interfere with other City Council business, and that Brown Act requirements may be met.

6.A

5.4 Agenda Items – Placement by Council.

Future Agenda Items. The agenda for each regular Council meeting shall designate a place for Council to identify “future agenda items” which the Council, by the affirmative vote of a majority of its Membership, may direct the City Manager to place on the agenda of a future Council meeting, and may specify the relative priority of the item along with date or time frame within which the item shall return to Council for study, discussion, or action. The items must be items of City Business or other items relevant to the City including without limitation informational presentations or ceremonial items.

5.4.1 Further Work on Existing Item. The Council may by the affirmative vote of a majority of its Membership, direct the City Manager to place items related to or in furtherance of an existing agenda item on a future agenda of the City Council to study, discuss, or act.

5.5 Agenda Items – Placement by Council Committee.

Where a Council Committee (whether standing or ad hoc) has been established as provided for in these Protocols, the Council Committee, is authorized to direct the City Manager to submit an update, report, and/or recommendation of the Council Committee, directly related to its subject jurisdiction on an upcoming agenda of the Council either as an update report, a study item or an item for discussion and action.

5.6 Agenda Items – Placement by Individual Members.

Individual Members may not direct the City Manager to place an item on a future Council meeting agenda. Individual Members may consult with and recommend to the City Manager items of City Business that they desire to be included on an agenda. However, Members are encouraged to utilize the process identified in Section 5.4 to place matters on a Council agenda.

5.7 Consultation Regarding the Draft and Posted Agendas.

Each Member is encouraged to schedule time with the City Manager to review the draft agenda for an upcoming meeting for the purpose of preparing for the meeting and having an opportunity to ask questions and obtain desired facts in advance of the meeting or to have such available at the meeting. Members are encouraged to identify to the City Manager and/or City Attorney any questions or additional information they desire related to any item on the posted agenda as soon as possible before the holding of a regular or special meeting, so as to provide the City Manager or City Attorney sufficient time to adequately address the question or request.

6.A

5.8 Matters Not Appearing on the Agenda.

No action or discussion shall take place on any item not appearing on the agenda for a regular meeting as posted, unless it falls under a noted exception within the Brown Act (i.e. item of subsequent need or emergency item). However, where an item has been raised by a member of the public during the public comment period, a Member may, ask the speaker for additional information or for contact information. The Member may also inquire of the City Manager about the topic, or the Council may direct the City Manager to review the matter and report back at a subsequent meeting or to have the appropriate Department Head following up with the speaker.

6. COUNCIL COMMITTEES

6.1 Purpose.

From time to time, the Council will find it desirable to create a Committee of the Council consisting of two of its Members. These Committees are typically formed to study, investigate, and make recommendations to the full Council regarding specific topics. In some instances these are standing Committees subject to the agenda and open meeting requirements of the Brown Act and in other instances these are ad hoc Committees that are not open to the public. In order for the Committees to serve effectively, it is necessary to establish certain policies for the conduct of City business by Committees.

6.1.1 Appointment.

Council Committees shall be appointed by the Mayor. Committee Members shall be promptly notified of their selection and the scope of the Committee assignment. The Mayor shall designate the term of the Committee and identify whether it is a standing appointment (on-going) or a short-term (ad hoc) assignment.
a) Standing Committee.

Standing Committee is a Committee that has a continuing subject matter jurisdiction or has a meeting schedule that is fixed by the Council and must comply with the same agenda and meeting requirements as does a full meeting of the Council. Standing Committees may include staff members or members of the public as Members of the Committee.
b) Ad Hoc Committee.

Ad Hoc Committee is a Committee that has a specific purpose and limited duration, does not have a continuing subject matter

6.A

jurisdiction, and does not have a meeting schedule that is fixed by the Council. Ad Hoc Committees may only include two Council Members as Members, but may request that the City Manager provide certain staff members to assist the Committee.
c) Committee Meetings.

Council Committee meetings shall be scheduled at times which allow for each Member to attend. Each Member should make an effort to accommodate the Committee meeting schedule. The schedule of Committee meetings shall be promptly communicated to each Committee Member. Individual Committee Members shall not meet with other citizens or organizations during a fact finding process or any other reason associated with the scope of the Committee’s purpose without first notifying all other Committee Members.
d) Communications.

Committee Members are obligated to keep the full Council well informed of the Committees’ meetings and work and shall report to the full Council at least once per month either by written or oral report offered at a regular Council meeting.

6.2 Committee Recommendations.

Generally, Committee Members should reach agreement on findings and recommendations to present to the City Council. When the opinions of Committee Members are divergent, each Member may submit his/her findings and recommendations separately to the City Council. Although written minutes of each Committee meeting are not required, Committee findings and recommendations should be presented to the City Council in a written document.

6.3 Staffing.

The City Manager may assign staff to Committees for the purposes of administrative services, to attend Committee meetings, and to assist with Committee presentations to the City Council, as staff are available for such tasks.

7. APPOINTMENTS

7.1 Appointments by Mayor to Other Public Agencies.

The Mayor shall at least annually or as more often as is reasonably necessary, appoint Members to positions (including alternates) with other governmental entities (e.g., Hemet / San Jacinto Water Master; Riverside Transit Agency; WRCOG, RCTC, etc.), and other public oriented organizations on which the City is entitled to positions (e.g., voting delegates at the League of California Cities).

6.A

In making these appointments, the Mayor shall be mindful of the best interests of the City, of creating a fair distribution of assignments among the Members, and any specific knowledge or interest expressed by Council Members as may be appropriate under the Brown Act.

7.2 Appointments by Council to City Commissions.

Except for those committees, boards, and commissions (collectively referred to herein as “City Commissions”) that have an alternative procedure, such as the Measure U Oversight Committee, which is governed by the terms of Measure U adopted by the voters of Hemet and Section 7.3 below, all appointments to City Commissions shall be through the following process:

Each Commission seat shall be assigned a number 1 through 5 each corresponding to a separate Member’s District.

When a Commission seat becomes vacant, or in advance of the current term of an appointee expiring, the City Clerk shall provide notice to the public as provided under the Maddy Act soliciting for interested persons to submit completed applications to the City Clerk. The City Clerk may group several vacant or expiring seats in one public notice.

The above does not prohibit a Member whose Commission appointee seat(s) become vacant or are expiring, from directly communicating with potential applicants within their District or the City at-large (or sphere of influence where allowed by City Ordinance) and encouraging them to submitting an application for their open seat(s).

All applications for a particular Commission seat, received by the City Clerk on or prior to the submittal deadline, shall be provided to the relevant Member for review and consideration.

Within the time specified by the City Clerk, the Member may conduct any interview or meeting process determined best in their own judgement. The Member is encouraged contact the City Department Head assigned to the Commission to discuss the specific knowledge, skills, experience or other traits, that may be helpful in serving on the Commission
The Member shall then nominate and submit the name of one person per Commission seat assigned to them for ratification by the City Council. No Commissioner may be seated without their appointment first being ratified by a majority of the members of the City Council voting at a duly noticed regular City Council meeting.

Notwithstanding the expiration of a term, any person appointed to a Commission shall continue to serve until a successor is appointed or the seat is otherwise vacated.

6.A

7.3 Measure U Citizen Oversight Committee

7.3.1 Qualifications. The Measure U Citizen Oversight Committee (“Committee”) is composed of seven members. All members of the Committee must be either:
(a) a resident of the City of Hemet;
(b) a resident of the City of Hemet’s Sphere of Influence; or (c) own a business having its primary offices located within the City of Hemet.

7.3.2 Applications.
(a) On or about the first regular meeting of December of each evennumbered year, the City Council shall set a future meeting date for interviews and consideration for appointment to the Committee. (b) The City Clerk shall thereafter post a public notice soliciting applications to the Committee with the deadline for returning applications set at least thirty days prior to the date set by the City Council for interviews. All applicants for appointment or reappointment must fill out a City of Hemet Measure U Citizen Oversight Committee application as approved by the City Council. The City Clerk shall transmit the applications to the members of the City Council at least fourteen days prior to the date set by the City Council for interviews and consideration of appointment to the Committee.

7.3.3 Appointment.
(a) On the day and time set by the City Council for interviews and consideration of appointment to the Committee, the City Council shall interview each applicant. Each City Councilmember shall then rank the applicants in order of preference.
(b) The top-ranked applicant for each City Councilmember shall be deemed nominated to the Committee. In the event two or more Councilmembers have the same applicant as their top-ranked applicant, then either Councilmember may elect to nominate their second ranked applicant, if not already nominated.
(c) The City Clerk shall then tally the remaining applicants, and the applicants receiving the highest ranks who were not nominated in the manner described above shall be deemed nominated to the Committee until there are seven nominations.

6.A

(d) The City Clerk shall then verify that the seven nominations contain a sufficient number of residents of the City of Hemet (a minimum of four).

If a sufficient number of residents have been nominated, the City Clerk shall read the names of the seven nominees to the Committee and the City Council shall vote whether to approve the nominations to the Committee.
(e) If there are fewer than four residents nominated to the Committee through the process described above, or in the event that the City Council does not approve any of the applicants nominated in the process described above, the City Council may receive nominations from City Councilmembers and vote upon such nominations until seven applicants have been appointed to the Committee.
(f) The foregoing shall not be construed to limit the authority of the City Council to appoint any qualified person to the Committee or require the appointment of any person. The purpose of this section is only to describe the process by which nominations to the Committee will be considered by the City Council.

7.4 City Council Vacancies
Consistent with state law, the preference of the City Council is to fill any vacancy that may occur on the City Council by appointment rather than incur the costs of calling a special election. Therefore, to ensure that the City Council has adequate time to receive and consider applications for appointment, the following actions shall be taken in the event a vacancy occurs on the City Council:

7.4.1 The City Clerk shall immediately notify the remaining members of the City Council of any vacancy that occurs.

7.4.2 The City Clerk shall publish a Notice of City Council Vacancy in a newspaper of general circulation for the City of Hemet stating that the City Council is seeking applications for appointment to fill a vacancy on the City Council. The notice shall state the length of the term to be filled, the deadline by which applications must be received, and the date by which an appointment must be made. Applications will only be considered from applicants who meet the residency and voter registration requirements of the Hemet Municipal Code for the district in which the vacancy exists. The deadline for receiving applications shall be no later than thirty (30) days after the vacancy occurs.

7.4.3 The application may request the applicant provide such information as the City Council may desire, and amend from time to time, but shall include the applicant’s name, age, primary residence address for the previous thirty (30) days, whether applicant is a registered voter, and a certification from the applicant that all information contained in the application is true and correct.

7.4.4 Following the application deadline, the Mayor shall call a special

6.A

meeting of the City Council for consideration of appointing any applicant the City Council determines qualified to fill the vacancy. If an applicant is appointed by the City Council, the applicant shall immediately take the oath of office and subsequently assume the duties as prescribed.

8. COUNCIL MEMBER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

8.1 Processing Correspondence.

8.1.1 When incoming correspondence (whether in writing or by email or other electronic format) is received addressed to a Member, it is opened by staff and placed in Member’s mailbox. Correspondence Mail marked “personal” or “confidential” shall be provided to the Member unopened.

8.1.2 Correspondence sent from the full Council or a Member regarding City projects, programs, actions, or issues must reflect the position of the Council (i.e. determined by not less than a majority of the Council’s Membership), unless the Member clearly identifies that they are stating their own personal opinion or position regarding the matter.

8.1.3 If a Member desires staff action regarding individually received mail, such as having it listed on the agenda or requesting a response from staff, the Member shall submit the request to the City Manager.

8.1.4 Types of Correspondence.
a) General Correspondence (Non-Agenda Items).

If the correspondence relates to a City matter not on a forthcoming agenda, it is routed by the City Manager to the appropriate Department Head or staff member who may draft a response with copies to Council Members and appropriate staff members. b) City Council Meeting/Agenda Related Correspondence.

If the correspondence relates to an item on a forthcoming City Council meeting agenda, it is provided to the City Clerk for inclusion in the Council packet for that business item and copied to the City Manager and appropriate staff members.
c) Correspondence Addressed to a Member.

If the correspondence is addressed to the full City Council or an individual Member, then it shall be routed directly to the full Council if so addressed or to the individual Member as the case may be.

6.A

8.2 Council Correspondence.

8.2.1 Mayor is Spokesperson. When appropriate, the Mayor shall make representations on behalf of the entire Council as provided at a Council meeting, and shall sign any letters representing the official position of the City Council.

8.2.2 Use of City Letterhead. Members shall only use City letterhead for the purpose of corresponding as a matter of official City business or matters within the scope of the Member’s official duties as a Council Member.

8.2.3 Use of City Seal & Logos. Members shall adhere to the City’s ordinance and polices regarding use of the City Seal and Logos.

8.2.4 Additional Restrictions on Use of City Letterhead, Seal & Logos. In addition to the restrictions by City ordinance or policy, Members shall not use City letterhead, City Seal or Logos, or other City resources where doing so would create the appearance of impropriety, including without limitation:
a) Using public office for personal gain or to promote personal business,
b) Giving preferential treatment to any person or group, c) Pursuing primarily personal interests or purposes,
d) Impeding governmental responsiveness or efficiency.
e) Use for Member campaign purposes.

8.2.5 Response Copied to Council. All Council Member
correspondence using City letterhead shall be copied to the full Council, to be received and filed at the next regularly scheduled meeting. For example, responses to citizen letters shall be copied to the full Council along with the original citizen correspondence.

8.2.6 Personal Correspondence.

Upon request, City Council Members shall be provided individual non-City letterhead stationery and envelopes for use in communications. These communications (including e-mail responses) shall be prepared by and sent at the expense of individual Council Members. Council Members may

6.A

utilize the City's outgoing mail service; however, postage shall be at the Council Member’s expense. Personal correspondence to or from Council Members do not require listing on the City Council agenda.

8.2.7 Correspondence Responding to Proposed County, State or Federal Legislation.

A request to the City to take a position on County, State, or Federal Legislation or regulations from a Member or recognized organization shall be brought to the City Manager who shall place the request on the agenda for the next available Council meeting. The City Manager shall provide a proposed position letter or resolution for Council consideration at the meeting. A vote of the majority of Council Membership shall be required for the City to take a position on the legislation or regulation. At the direction of Council, the City Manager shall send the letter or resolution to the organization or governmental entity.

8.2.8 Urgency Matters.

If the proposed legislation or regulation is considered by the City Manager or Mayor to be extremely beneficial or extremely detrimental to the City’s interests, a letter may be prepared immediately for the Mayor’s signature, with copies being provided to the whole Council.

This procedure is particularly appropriate if the City’s position is similar or identical to a past City position on this matter and/or is consistent with the position taken by the League of California Cities.

9. USE OF CITY PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT OR RESOURCES

9.1 Overview.

The City has a great many complex services, programs and projects being carried out at the direction of the Council. The orderly management and control of these programs and projects are essential to the effective and efficient accomplishments of these efforts. The Council’s role is to provide policy direction and the role of the City Manager is to organize and carry out the policies.

Effective management and control require Council and professional staff to maintain their respective roles. The following rules and procedures are designed to help assure clear direction and efficiency of City operations.

9.2 Use of City Resources.

State law prohibits the use of City personnel or other public resources for any personal use or personal business and other non-City activity by elected or appointed official of which said use is not directly related to City business.

Member campaign activities are considered personal and not City business.

6.A

9.3 City Manager Authorization.

9.3.1 Outside Activities.

The use of City personnel or other resources for outside activities which are directly related to City business, such as JPAs or recognized community groups, requested by an individual Member shall be considered by the City Manager and approved at the City Manager’s discretion or by the Council as an agendized item at a regular public meeting. Prior to volunteering or encouraging the use of staff for an issue of a Council Committee, ad hoc Committee, neighborhood meeting, regional board, the board of another jurisdiction, or other activity, a Member shall confer with the City Manager, the latter of whom shall determine if it conforms to Council policy or if it is necessary to present the request for staff use to the Council at a City Council meeting.

9.3.2 Requests for Research or Information from City Staff.

Council Members shall make their request for services or information to the City Manager and not directly to City staff. The individual Member may make his/her request orally or in writing to the City Manager. The use of City staff to respond to an individual Member’s request for any purpose that is likely to exceed two (2) hours of total staff time must be approved by the majority vote of the Council Membership. The City Manager shall provide an estimate of the cost and how the request affects the Council’s goals and projects. This request shall then be agendized at a regular Council meeting for Council consideration. Members should be mindful of limited staff and City resources.

9.3.3 Request for Research or Information from City Attorney.

Council Members may request information or research from the City Attorney on a given topic directly when it is anticipated that the request can be completed by the City Attorney in less than an hour. Requests for legal review that are anticipated to take more than one hour to complete shall be directed to the Council for consideration during a Council meeting.

Requests for new information or policy direction shall be brought to the full Council at a regular meeting for consideration.

9.3.4 Requests from Public.

Requests from the public (including governmental entities) for information whether directly or to Member or City staff shall be treated as a public

6.A

records request and handled in accordance with the City’s policies and the Public Records Act.

10. USE OF CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS

10.1 Primary Purpose.

The City Council may designate any location within the City of Hemet that meets the requirements of the Brown Act as its regular meeting place and such location shall be known as the City Council Chambers. The primary purpose of the City Council Chambers is for meetings of the City Council, and may be used for meetings of the Planning Commission, Infrastructure Commission, other City Council advisory bodies, and Task Forces established by the Council or City Manager for City business, as may be convenient or appropriate. The Council may consider other uses of the Chambers consistent with the provisions set forth below.

10.2 Calendar.

A calendar of use shall be maintained by the City Clerk’s office, and all requests for use should be regularly calendared or scheduled through that office.

10.3 Parameters.

10.3.1 The City Council Chambers shall not be used for political or commercial purposes except as outlined herein. The City shall allow the use of the Council Chambers for the conduct of educational election forums, whether for city, county, state, or national offices/ballot measures, if all of the following conditions are met:
a) The forum is not a campaign event, rally or activity, or political fundraising event; and
b) The forum is open to the public; and
c) The forum is for educational purposes, which may include candidate debates or meetings with the community; and
d) When the event is chaired and moderated in an impartial and objective way which is fair to all candidates/ballot measures.

10.3.2 Special Rules for Ballot Measures.

6.A

a) In accordance with Government Code Section 54964, staff shall ensure that any use of City funds to promote or host a forum on any ballot measure complies with the following requirements: (1) any use of funds for informational activities related to the forum is not prohibited by the Constitution or laws of the State of California, and (2) any informational materials provided through the use of City funds constitutes an accurate, fair, and impartial presentation of relevant facts to aid the voters in reaching an informed judgment regarding the ballot measure. In accordance with Government Code
Section 54964, staff shall also ensure that City funds are not used for the purpose of supporting or opposing the election or defeat of any candidate.

10.4 City-Owned and Operated Television and Broadcasting Capability.

Use of City-owned and operated television and broadcasting capability shall be limited to broadcast of City Council, Planning Commission, and other City advisory body meetings, and for City-related emergency or informational purposes as authorized by the City Manager. Use of the video broadcasting system by an outside agency is not allowed except with the permission of the City Council at least two weeks prior to the event. If such use is granted it is subject to appropriate personnel – equipment – overhead charges as established by the City Manager.

11. COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND POLICIES

11.1 Mayor to Act as Council Ceremonial Representative.

The Mayor has been delegated the responsibility to act as the City Council’s ceremonial representative at public events and functions. In the Mayor’s absence, the “Mayor Pro Tem” assumes this responsibility. In both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem’s absence, the Mayor shall appoint another Member to assume this responsibility.

11.2 Honoring Residents and Other Worthy Persons.

It is the policy of the City Council to honor people and organizations who have contributed to the improvement or to the welfare of the City. Recommendations may be made by citizens to an appropriate Commission, Board, or Committee or directly to the City Council. The City Council may request the advice of a Commission, Board or Committee to determine merit or, if desirable, to hold a public hearing prior to a formal dedication. Recognition may also be given to individuals for their personal achievement or for enhancing the image of the City.

The accolades could include awards, certificates, resolutions or proclamations. In addition, perpetual plaques or awards can be bestowed on individuals.

11.2.1 Proclamations and Resolutions of Support.

6.A

If any person requests a proclamation or resolution of support for any person or organization, the following procedure should be followed:
a) Incoming requests for proclamations or resolutions of support shall be provided to the City Manager, or their designee, in writing at least four (4) weeks prior to the Council meeting date and should include the draft content of the proclamation or resolution. Content may be changed
after submission at the discretion of the City Manager. The matter shall then be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting for approval, and may thereafter be presented by the Mayor at the Council meeting or an event, or be picked up/mailed. In the event that the Mayor is unable to attend an event, the “Mayor Pro Tem” or a Member may attend on
behalf of the Council.
b) If a request for a proclamation or resolution is submitted with insufficient content, the requestor should be contacted and advised that a certificate of recognition is more appropriate for the occasion.
c) If a request for a certificate of recognition is submitted with insufficient content that requestor should be contacted to provide additional information about the request.
d) Certain requests for recognition are considered routine in nature and may be processed by the City Manager in
whatever manner deemed appropriate, without the need for the four (4) weeks advance notice discussed above. Such routine requests include, but are not limited to Student of the Month, New Business Recognitions, Recognition of certain days/weeks/months to coincide with their customary
observance (a standing list of which may be approved by the Council and updated as the Council directs) and recognition of significant life events for Hemet residents (e.g.,
recognition of Centenarians, 50-year anniversaries) and retirements of City staff following significant years of service. e) If a request for a perpetual plaque or award is submitted, or if a request for dedication of a municipal building, room, or facility, is submitted, the request shall be directed to Infrastructure Commission for public hearing consistent with the City’s naming policy. If after the public hearing the Infrastructure Commission recommends dedication to the
Council, the Council shall hold a public hearing prior to taking action on the dedication request.

6.A

11.3 Council Member Participation in Community Activities.

From time to time, Members may choose to participate in non-city organized or sponsored organizations, activities, committees, events, and task forces. When a Member participates in these types of activities, the Member is not acting on behalf of the City Council. Members may identify themselves as Members of the Council, but must indicate that they are acting as an individual Member, rather than representing the Council. Acting or participating on behalf of the City Council is limited to those instances when the Council has formally designated the Member as its representative to the organization or for the activity.

12. ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
Members shall observe the highest standards of ethical conduct in dealing with the community and carrying out their official duties. In every action and decision, Members should avoid even the appearance of impropriety and are strongly encouraged to apply the guidelines for “Making Ethical Decisions” provided below.

12.1 Avoiding the Appearance of Impropriety.

12.1.1 Making Ethical Decisions.

Members are referred to Appendix “B” (Guidelines for Making Ethical Decisions) for the process Members are encouraged to utilize in making City related decisions.

12.1.2 Council Members May Need to Refrain From Participating.

Conflict-of-interest issues are complex and opaque to the public. Some situations are not “legal” conflicts of interest, but may nevertheless pose the “appearance of impropriety” to the public. In such situations, the Member should not participate in the matter.

12.1.3 Smell Test.

Council Members shall do an ethical “smell check” or “gut check” regarding the matter. What is your conscience telling you?

12.1.4 Assistance.

To assist in making a decision not to participate, Members should consult the Guidelines for Making Ethical Decisions (below), the City Attorney or the FPPC helpline, and/or their constituents.

12.2 Ethical Principles to Follow.

12.2.1 Be a Good Steward.

6.A

Good stewardship of the public’s interest must be the Member’s primary concern.

12.2.2 The Common Good.

Members shall work for the common good of the citizens and not for any private gain, political advantage or personal interest.

12.2.3 Fairness and Equity.

Members shall treat all members of the public and issues before them in a fair and equitable manner.

12.2.4 Impartiality.

Members shall be independent of special interests and impartial in decision making.

12.2.5 Avoid Personal Interests.

Members are prohibited from using their official positions to influence decisions in which they have a personal financial interest, are members of an interested organization, or have a personal relationship that would be affected.

12.2.6 No Personal Gain.

Members shall not take advantage of, or use, public property and equipment, public services, confidential public information, public resources, or other opportunities afforded by their office, for personal gain.

12.2.7 Appearing Before Council.

Members shall not appear before the City Council or other City Board or Commission representing any private interest or community group.

Council Members are permitted to speak as a member of the public on any matter that affects them personally, but may not participate in the matter as a Member.

12.2.8 Gifts.

Members shall refrain from accepting gifts, favors or promises of future benefits that might compromise their independence, or the appearance that they are independent and unbiased.

12.2.9 Campaign Contributions.

As an integral part of running for an elective office, Members have a right to receive campaign contributions, to the extent and as allowed by law.

6.A

Members should review and become familiar with the City’s local campaign contribution limitation.

12.2.10 Conflict where Campaign Contribution Received.

No Member shall not participate in any City decision or action where the Member has accepted a campaign contribution from any Contractor, Vendor or Developer that has a direct interest in the decision or action, within the past twelve (12) months unless the Member’s participation would be legally required pursuant to Section 18705 “Legally Required Participation” of the FPPC Regulations.

For the purposes of this section, "Contractor" and "Vendor" means any person or entity who has an existing contract, agreement, or other arrangement to provide the City with goods, services, or other items, or who has an interest in or expectation of obtaining such a contract, agreement or arrangement in the future. The terms “Contractor” and “Vendor” include agents and representatives of the Contractor or Vendor, and where the Contractor or Vendor is a business entity, includes all owners, principals, shareholders, partners (whether general or limited), members, officers, directors, and managers.

Example: Member A received a $250 campaign contribution from Contractor X during the most recent election eight (8) months ago. The City Council is now being asked to vote on an amendment to the agreement with Contractor X. Because Member A received a campaign contribution within the past twelve (12) months, Member A would be prohibited from participating in the decision on amending the contract.

For the purposes of this section, "Developer" means any person or entity who is currently seeking, or who has an interest in or expectation of seeking from the City a Specific Plan, Zone Change, Development Agreement, Density Bonus, Subdivision Tract Map, or a Conditional Use Permit for a sensitive use (i.e., adult business, massage parlor, etc.), or an industrial or commercial use having a building area of 20,000 square feet or more. "Developer" includes agents and representatives of the Developer, and where the Developer is a business entity, includes all owners, principals, shareholders, partners (whether general or limited), members, officers, directors, and managers.

Example: Member B received a $250 campaign contribution from Developer X during the most recent election ten (10) months ago. The City Council is now being asked to vote on Developer’s application to construct a 25,000 square foot distribution facility. Because Member B received a campaign contribution within the past twelve (12) months and because the facility is over 20,000 square feet in size, Member B would be prohibited from participating in the decision regarding the application.

6.A

13. EFFICIENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
The City of Hemet operates under a council-manager form of government under which the Council’s role is to provide legislative direction, set City policy and monitor its implementation. The City Manager serves as the City’s administrative head and is responsible for directing the day-to-day operations of the City and for administering all City business.

13.1 Members Shall Not Interfere with Operations.

No Member of the City Council shall interfere with the execution by the City Manager of his/her powers and duties; nor shall any Member direct the City Manager to appoint or remove any officer or employee of the City. Except for the purpose of inquiry, no Council Member shall deal with the administrative services of City except by and through the City Manager; nor shall any Council Member give any order or direction to any subordinate officer or employee of City. This section shall not apply during a period of disaster proclaimed by the Governor or City Council in accordance with California law, when the normal functioning of the City’s government is not feasible based on the Circumstances.

13.2 Stay Out of Personnel Matters.

Members shall not interfere with the appointment, evaluation, discipline or removal by the City Manager of any Department Head or employee of the City.

13.2.1 Exception – City Attorney.

The City Attorney is hired, appointed, evaluated, and removed directly by the Council.

13.2.2 Exception – City Manager.

The City Manager is hired, appointed, evaluated and removed directly by the City Council.

13.3 Orders and Direction to Employees.

Only the City Manager may give orders and direction to City employees.

Members shall not direct the work or actions of City employees.

13.3.1 Requests for Information.

6.A

All Members shall direct requests for information, research, or reports to the City Manager and applicable Department Head or his/her designee, and not to City Employees. If there is a legal question, it should be directed to the City Attorney. Questions regarding elections and disclosure statements may be addressed to the City Clerk.

13.3.2 Responses.

Responses to Member substantive information inquiries shall be provided to all Members of the same category (e.g., a response to a request by a Council Member shall be provided to all Council Members).

13.3.3 Notification.

Where the City Manager or Department Head provides general facts or information about the City, a program, or a City event to one Member, it should be provided to all Members of the same category.

13.4 Staff Liaisons to City Commissions / Committees and Outside Agencies.

Members serving as the City’s representative to a City Commission or Committee or to an outside agency may interact directly with the City employee assigned to that effort by the City Manager.

13.5 Operations and Service Levels.

Criticisms of City operations and service levels may be made only to the City Manager and not to City employees or Department Heads, unless first cleared through the City Manager or expressed in general during a Council meeting.

13.6 Political Solicitation and Activities.

Members shall not solicit political support from City employees (e.g., financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, etc.).

Members shall not engage in political activities at City Hall or other City facilities.

This provision is not intended to impair the free exercise of federal and state constitutional and statutory rights by City employees.

14. INTERACTION OF MEMBERS

14.1 Mayor.

14.1.1 Honorary Presiding Officer.

The positions of Mayor is generally considered honorary and ceremonial, but also serves an important procedural role as the presiding officer at

6.A

meetings of the City Council. Persons appointed to the position by a majority of the City Council serve at the pleasure of the City Council.

14.1.2 Maintain Order, Decorum and Procedure.

The Mayor is responsible for maintaining order and decorum of meetings and enforcing the City’s decorum rules where necessary. The Mayor is responsible for the order of business at meetings, the efficient flow of business during meetings, and for preserving the right of the public to be heard in an orderly fashion.

14.1.3 Ceremonial Head.

The Mayor is the ceremonial head of the City and signs all proclamations, officiates at all City functions, and welcomes visiting dignitaries.

14.1.4 Spokesperson.

The Mayor is the official spokesperson for the City and has the lead responsibility for communications with the press and public on official City business. The Mayor shall work on press releases and statements to the press with the City Manager and shall report the majority position adopted by the Council, and not his or her personal opinion on matters. This section shall not be construed to prevent the dissemination of information from the City Manager on factual matters related to the operation of the City (?).

14.2 At Public Meetings.

14.2.1 Follow Rules of Order, Decorum and Procedure.

Members shall adhere to the rules of order, decorum and procedure for the conduct of public meetings adopted by the City Council from time to time. Abiding by these rules will maintain civility and the orderly conduct of business.

14.2.2 Keep Conduct Professional.

Members shall conduct themselves in an orderly, professional, and business-like manner to ensure that the business of the City shall be attended to efficiently and thoroughly.

14.2.3 Professional Attire.

Members should wear professional and business-like attire at public meetings. The Mayor may allow business casual attire during the summer or for special events or occasions.

6.A

14.2.4 Keep Comments on Topic.

Public meetings are to attend to and resolve City business. Members shall avoid being overly repetitious and shall endeavor to limit their comments to the subject matter at hand. Members are encouraged to fully express their views and to explore the views of others, but Members should also be mindful of avoiding lengthy or unproductive debates.

14.2.5 Ask Questions in Advance.

When preparing for public meetings, Members are encouraged to provide their questions far enough in advance to the City Manager or City Attorney so that meaningful information and responses can be shared at the meeting.

14.3 Relations with Fellow Members.

14.3.1 Civility.

Members shall always practice civility. By doing so, the Member helps the City to fulfill its potential by putting the common good ahead of personal rivalries or irritations. Civility is best fostered by a collective commitment to following established rules of procedure.

14.3.2 Team Spirit.

While Members may occasionally disagree, Members shall strive foster a collegiate or team-oriented environment among themselves.

14.3.3 Retreats, Goal Setting and Training.

To encourage a strong working relationship and communication, Members should have at least one retreat, goal setting session, and/or group training session each year.

14.3.4 Different Points of View.

Members shall exercise tolerance for the different opinions, perspectives, and points of view of their colleagues and shall recognize their right to express these views on matters of City business within the established rules of decorum and order of business.

14.3.5 Managing Conflict.

Members shall manage disagreement with civility and professionalism and shall not allow disagreement to turn into open conflict or hostility.

Members shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal

6.A

attacks upon the character or motives of other Members, City employees and/or members of the public.

14.4 Public Communication and Appearance.

14.4.1 Personal versus City Positions.

It is an important part of each Member’s responsibility to communicate with the public. In communications regarding City business, it is important to distinguish a Member’s personal views and opinions and the adopted City position. When appearing before another governmental agency or organization, the Member shall clearly set forth the City’s official position, and then may express their own position.
a) Expressing Dissent.

Each Member has a right under the First Amendment to express their views and opinions, even if contrary to the official position of the City. However, Members shall express their dissenting views with tact and civility.

14.4.2 Use of Official Titles.

Members may use their official title only when conducting official City business, for informational purposes, or as an indication of background and expertise, after having carefully considered whether they are exceeding or appearing to exceed their authority.

14.4.3 Response to Public Communication.

Members are encouraged to respond promptly to letters, telephone calls and other communications received from members of the Public who have requested a response. Members are not required to respond to commercial solicitations or to anonymous, obnoxious, or harassing communications.

15. ENFORCEMENT

15.1 Member Responsibility.

Upon adoption of these Protocols and thereafter upon assuming office, each Member shall sign a statement affirming they read and understood these Protocols. Each Member is responsible for adhering to these Protocols, as well as the laws that comprise the basic legal framework for local government discussed in the first part of the Protocols.

6.A

15.2 Council Authority.

Only the City Council has the authority, but not the legal obligation, to monitor each Member’s adherence to these Protocols and to take corrective action for violations, as provided below.

15.2.1 Training and Education.

The City Council shall sponsor periodic training opportunities for Members to become more familiar with the Protocols and the legal framework (See Appendix “A”).

15.2.2 Council Members.

Under California law, the Council does not have the legal authority to remove Members elected or appointed to the City Council or to otherwise deprive them of their office. However, as provided in Section 15.4, a majority of the Council Members may remove a Council Member from all Council honorary and/or ceremonial positions and ad-hoc and standing Committees, as well as from positions with other governmental agencies or other organizations they hold by virtue of appointment by the City Council.

15.3 Violation of Oath of Office or the Law.

All Members take an oath upon assuming office, pledging to uphold the Constitutions of the State of California and United States of America, laws of the City, and the statutes of the state and the federal government. In addition, Members commit to disclosing to the appropriate authorities and/or to the City Council any behavior or activity that may qualify as corruption, abuse, fraud, bribery or other violation of the law.

Constitutional and legal violations do not fall under these enforcement procedures and should rather be investigated and enforced under the appropriate civil or criminal proceedings by the appropriate authorities.

15.4 Violation of Protocols.

15.4.1 Complaint.

Where any person has substantial evidence that a Member has materially violated these Protocols, they may file a written statement with the City Clerk who shall then provide it to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

15.4.2 Enforcement.

6.A

The City Council shall enforce these Protocols against Members utilizing the procedures outlined in the City of Hemet’s Admonition/Censure Policy, attached hereto as Appendix F.

16. FAILURE TO OBSERVE COUNCIL PROTOCOLS
These Protocols are adopted to expedite the transaction of the business of the Council in an orderly fashion and are procedural only and the failure to strictly observe such rules does not affect the jurisdiction of the Council or invalidate action taken at a meeting that is otherwise held in conformity with law. These Protocols shall not be construed as creating any private right of action with any person for their enforcement, enforcement of the Protocols rests exclusively with the City Council in their sound discretion.

6.A

APPENDIX A – LEGAL FRAMEWORK & RESOURCES

1.0 Legal Framework
Law or Regulations Citation
California Laws
California Constitution Article XI §§ 2, 5, 7, & 11.

General City Authority
Ralph M. Brown Act Government Code §§ 54950 et seq.

Open Meeting Laws
California Public Records Act Government Code §§ 6250 et seq.

Public Records Disclosure
California Political Reform Act Government Code §§ 81000 et seq.

Conflicts, Disclosures & Campaigns
FPPC Regulations 2 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 18109 et seq.

Conflicts, Disclosures & Campaigns
Legally Required Participation 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18708 California Anti-Self Dealing Law Government Code §§ 1090 et seq.

Self Interest in Contracts
California Incompatibility of Office Law Government Code § 1126 & § 1099 Holding Two Public Offices
Hemet City Documents
City Municipal Code Chapter 2 “Administration”
City Council Rules of Order and Protocols
Reimbursement Policy

6.A

2.0 Online Resources
Resource Web Address
State of California www.ca.gov/index.asp
Portal to State Websites
Official Cal. Legislative Information www.leginfo.gov
California Bills & Codes Online
Cal. Fair Political Practice Commission www.fppc.ca.gov Conflict of Interest Info
Cal. Attorney General https://oag.ca.gov
See AG Opinions
Cal. Senate www.senate.ca.gov
Bill Information Online
Cal. Secretary of State www.sos.ca.gov
Election Information
LA County Registrar–Recorder/County Clerk www.lavote.net Election Information
League of California Cities www.cacities.org
Municipal resources
Institute for Local Government www.ca-ilg.org
Municipal resources
Cal. Association of Joint Powers Authorities www.cajpa.org Risk Management & Training
Marrkula Institute for Applied Ethics www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision Ethical Decision Making

6.A

APPENDIX B – GUIDELINES FOR MAKING ETHICAL DECISIONS1
How to Make an Ethical Decision. When presented with an opportunity to participate in making a decision for the City, the City Official should:

A. Recognize whether an ethical issue is involved.

1. Will the decision result in damage or injury to people?

2. Is there a clear good or bad result?

3. Is the result compelled under the law or does it hinge on budgetary, efficiency, or other community concerns?

4. Ethical decisions are often not the easiest decision, nor the most popular.

B. Get the facts.

1. Read the staff report and get questions answered by the City Manager in advance.

2. Are there alternatives that would lead to better or worse results?

3. What are the viewpoints of the stakeholders? Are some more important than others?

4. Are there any unanticipated consequences?
C. Evaluate alternative actions. Which option will:

1. Produce the most good and do the least harm? (See The Markkula Center’s Utility Test.)
a. Identify the alternative actions that are possible and the persons and groups (the stakeholders) who will be affected by these actions.
b. For each of the most promising alternatives, determine the benefits and costs to each person or group affected.
c. Select the action in the current situation that produces the greatest benefits over costs for all affected.
1 From the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at the University of Santa Clara, available at https://www.scu.edu/media/ethics-center/resources/making.pdf

6.A

d. Ask what would happen if the action were a policy for all similar situations.

2. Best respect the rights of all who have a stake? (See The Markkula Center’s Rights Test.)
a. Identify the right being upheld or violated.
b. Explain why it deserves the status of a right.
c. Ask whether that right conflicts with the rights of others.

3. Treat people equally or proportionately? (See The Markkula Center’s Justice Test.)
a. What is the distribution of benefits and burdens? Is the distribution fair?
b. If disagreement persists over which outcome is fair, select a fair process to decide the issue.

4. Best serve the community as a whole? (See The Markkula Center’s Common Good Test.)
a. Identify what parts of the common good are involved. b. Explain obligations to promote or protect the common good. c. Discern whether the proposed action conflicts with an obligation to promote or protect the common good.

5. Lead the City Official to act as the sort of person or official as they want to be? (See The Markkula Center’s Virtue Test.)
a. Will the action help to make you the kind of person you want to be?
b. Will the action fit the City’s reputation or vision of what it would like to be?
c. Will the action maintain the right balance between
excellence and success for the City?
D. Make a decision and test it.

1. Which approach best suits the situation and arrives at the most ethical decision?

6.A

2. Which option is likely to be most respected by the Member’s colleagues and constituents?
E. Act and reflect on the outcome.

1. How can the decision be implemented to best reflect the intention and reasons for the decision?

2. What was the end result of the decision and what feedback has the City Official received?

6.A

APPENDIX C – ROSENBERG’S RULES OF ORDER

6.A

APPENDIX D – EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR CITY COUNCIL

6.A

APPENDIX E – Procedural Rules for Quasi-Judicial Hearings Rule 1 - Hearing Procedures

1.01 The Mayor shall announce the agenda item number and state the subject of the agenda item. The Mayor shall then identify that the agenda item is a quasijudicial hearing and announce that the hearing is open.

1.02 The Mayor shall direct the City Clerk to administer the following oath to any person that desires to testify before the City Council on the item:
"Any member of the public wishing to address this City Council on this item please stand and raise your right hand."
The City Clerk shall then administer the following oath:
"Do you solemnly affirm that the testimony you are about to give before the City Council will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? If so, please say 'I do."'

1.03 The Mayor shall then request that the members of the City Council disclose any communications they have had under Rule 6 or any item required to be disclosed under the Council Protocols.

1.04 The Mayor shall then invite the City Manager, or other appropriate City staff member, to report on the item including any recommendation that they might have. The City Manager, or other appropriate City staff member shall have a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed fifteen (15) minutes, to report on the item.

1.05 The Mayor shall then ask members of the City Council if they have any questions for the City staff giving the report. At this point, the members of the City Council may ask clarifying questions to the City staff person who reported on the item and City staff shall be given a reasonable amount of time to respond.

1.06 The Mayor shall then invite the applicant or appellant, if any, to provide evidence and testimony on the item. The applicant or appellant shall have a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed fifteen (15) minutes, to provide evidence and testimony.

1.07 The Mayor shall then ask members of the City Council if they have any questions for the applicant or appellant. At this point, the members of the City Council may ask clarifying questions to the appellant or applicant and they shall be given time to respond.

6.A

1.07 The Mayor shall then invite any members of the public to provide evidence and testimony on the item. The Mayor shall inquire as to whether the member of the public has been sworn in and request that they state their name and address for the record. Members of the public shall have a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed three (3) minutes, to provide evidence and testimony.

1.08 The Mayor shall then invite the applicant or appellant, if any, to provide any rebuttal evidence and testimony. The applicant or appellant shall have a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed five (5) minutes, to provide rebuttal evidence and testimony.

1.09 The Mayor shall then ask members of the City Council if they have any final questions for the applicant or appellant. At this point, the members of the City Council may ask clarifying questions to the appellant or applicant and they shall be given a reasonable amount of time to respond.

1.10 The Mayor shall then announce that the public hearing is closed and invite a motion for the City Council to consider. The Mayor shall announce the name of the member of the City Council who makes the motion. The Mayor shall then invite a second to the motion and announce the name of the member of the City Council who seconds the motion.

1.11 The Mayor shall then invite members of the City Council to discuss the motion. If there is no desired discussion, or after the discussion has ended, the Mayor shall then announce that the City Council will vote on the motion. If there has been no discussion or only brief discussion, the vote may proceed immediately. If there has been substantial discussion, the Mayor may ask the City Clerk to read the motion before the vote is taken.

1.12 The City Council shall memorialize the decision in writing and may instruct the City Manager to prepare a written decision for approval during a subsequent meeting of the City Council.

Rule 2 - Hearings Are Informal; Rules of Evidence
Quasi-judicial hearings before the City Council are intended to be informal in nature and accessible to members of the public. Formal rules of evidence and discovery do not apply.

Rule 3 - Records of Proceedings
The City Clerk shall record all quasi-judicial hearings by audio and/or video recording device, as available.

Rule 4 - Time Limits

6.A

Notwithstanding the time limits contained in Rule 1 above, the Mayor shall give City staff providing the report on the item, the applicant or appellant bringing the matter before the City Council, and any other person with a direct interest in the decision sufficient time to provide evidence and testimony, and may, at the discretion of the Mayor, allow for additional time.

Rule 5 - Oaths; Identification
Any person wishing to provide testimony during a quasi-judicial hearing may do so without the oath described in these Rules being administered or providing their name and address. The City Council may determine both the weight and credibility given to unsworn or anonymous testimony.

Rule 6 – Communications

6.01 Members of the City Council may receive information relevant to the item through communications with any person prior to the hearing. These communications are known as "ex parte communications" and are substantive oral or written communications concerning quasi-judicial matters that occur outside of the quasi-judicial hearing. Such communications raise due process concerns for the parties involved in the hearing. When members of the City Council have had ex parte communications relevant to the quasi-judicial hearing, the Member of the City Council shall disclose the communication and the substance of the information received at the beginning of the hearing.

6.02 While the hearing is before the City Council, there shall be no communication, direct or indirect, regarding any issue in the proceeding, to the members of the City Council, without notice and an opportunity for all persons present at the hearing to participate in the communication.

6.03 Ex parte communications after the hearing has closed and before the final decision is rendered are prohibited because there is no opportunity for rebuttal.

Rule 7 – Attention
The Members of the City Council shall be attentive to the evidence and testimony being presented.

Rule 8 - Identification of Quasi-Judicial Matters on the Agenda The City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, will identify agenda items involving quasi-judicial decisions on the agenda for the City Council with reference given to these Rules. This identification is intended to inform the City Council, interested parties, and the public that these Rules will apply to the item, but the failure to identify an item shall not be cause for continuance.

6.A

APPENDIX F – ADMONITION/CENSURE POLICY

CITY OF HEMET

ADMONITION/CENSURE POLICY
I. Purpose
This policy applies the elected officials of the City of Hemet and concerns conduct offensive to the laws, regulations, rules, and norms governing ethical, effective, and transparent government. Any action taken by the City Council under this policy shall be a final action and is not subject to an appeal or reconsideration.

II. Policy
It is the policy of the Council that all elected officials of the City shall perform their duties in an ethical and lawful manner that furthers the public interest.

Actions counter to these principals undermines the effectiveness of the City government as a whole and foster distrust from the public.

The Council therefore determines that it may take action to admonish or censure any elected official of the City, by the affirmative votes of a majority of the members of the Council for any of the following (“Violations”):

A. Conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendre to, any crime or offense (other than minor traffic violations or similar offenses) which is likely to have a material adverse impact on the City’s or elected official’s reputation;
B. Failure of the elected official to observe or perform any of his or her duties and obligations, or failure to follow the provisions of state law or City ordinance or policy, when such failure continues for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of his or her receipt of notice from the City Council specifying the acts or omissions deemed to amount to that failure; C. Conviction of any crime involving an “abuse of office or position,” as that term is defined in Government Code Section 53243.4;
D. Any action or inaction by the elected official that materially and adversely: (a) impedes or disrupts the operations of City or its organizational units; (b) is detrimental to employees or

6.A

public safety; or (c) violates City’s properly established rules or procedures.

Depending on the circumstances of alleged violations, the Council may initiate an investigation of the allegations prior to the filing of a request for any of the actions described in this policy. An investigation, however, is not required.

Nothing in this policy shall preclude individual elected officials from making public statements regarding such alleged conduct. While the Council has broad discretion in deciding certain actions it may choose to take for violations of the above, which would not require the Council to adopt policy, including but not limited to voting to remove a elected official from a Committee or Board, a vote of no confidence in a particular elected official, or reassignment of duties as authorized by state law, this policy provides definitions and procedures related to two types of actions: admonition and censure.

III. Admonition
An admonition of an elected official is informal in nature. An admonition may be issued in response to a particular alleged Violation and may be issued by the Council without any findings of fact regarding allegations. As an admonition it is by its nature a warning or reminder, the Council is not required to conduct an investigation or separate hearings to determine whether the allegation is true. The Council recognizes the right to criticize is protected by the First Amendment, and that the Council may do so as a body.

IV. Censure
Censure is an official reprimand or condemnation made by Council in response to specified conduct by an elected official of the City. Censure is disciplinary in nature and requires the formal adoption of a resolution setting forth the elected official’s alleged Violation(s). Although not required, censure could involve an investigation and it must protect the due process rights of the elected official being investigated. Censure carries no fine or suspension of the rights of the elected official.

V. Procedure
A. Admonition. The Council may determine, by a vote of a majority of its members, to make an informal admonition at any Council meeting during the Reports of Councilmembers portion of the meeting. The Councilmember moving the informal admonition must state on the record the basis for the informal admonition, including the alleged Violation(s). After receiving the motion, the Presiding Officer shall ask

6.A

for a second. If no second is received, the motion shall not be considered. If a second to the motion to admonish is received, the City Council shall, after discussion and public comment, vote on whether to make the informal admonition.

The vote on the informal admonition shall then be entered into the minutes by the City Clerk and shall state the following:

1. The name of the elected official admonished and the
particular type of behavior that is alleged to be Violation(s); and

2. Any direction given to the elected official to correct the behavior that is alleged to be Violation(s).

B. Censure. The Council may, as part of a public hearing item placed on the agenda at a regular meeting of the Council, discuss and take action on to formally censure an elected official. The City Clerk shall provide a formal notice of the public hearing to the elected official who is the subject of the potential censure. The notice shall contain the specific allegations and/or charges on which the proposed censure is based and the date and time that the matter will be heard. At the hearing, the Councilmembers who requested the hearing shall have a cumulative total time of no more than 10 minutes to state the reason(s) they are requesting the censure, and the elected official who is the subject of the action shall have up to 10 minutes to respond. Following the hearing, the Council may take action by a majority vote of its members setting forth its findings and decision.

The Council may direct the City Attorney to prepare for adoption at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting, a resolution of censure that clearly sets forth the facts supporting the allegations of misconduct giving rise to the censure. A resolution of censure may include the imposition of such actions against the elected official that are permitted by law, such as removal from a Committee or Board, a vote of no confidence in a particular elected official, or reassignment of duties as authorized by state law.

6.A

13.A

City of Hemet
California
Proclamation
Never Give Up Day
WHEREAS, the City of Hemet proudly joins community members in CelebratingNeverGiveUpDayonThursday,August 18,2022;and
WHEREAS, Never Give Up Day is focused on cultivating a mindset determinationtohelppeoplegetthroughdifficultchallenges;and WHEREAS, Never Give Up Day not only applauds people for reaching their goals but also supports those who are still trying to achieve their goals;and
WHEREAS, Never Give Up Day remains relevant for health care providing organizations, associations and charities in their efforts to establishacalltoactionandfundraisingactivities;and
WHEREAS, The City of Hemet recognizes Never Give Up Day and its positiveinfluenceforpeopleacrossourcommunity.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Mayor Lilienthal along with theHemetCityCouncildoherebyproclaimAugust 18,2022as:

NeverGiveUpDay
intheCityof Hemetandcalluponallcitizens tomakethisdaya
springboardforawareness raisingactions.

PresentedAugust9,2022
Malcolm Lilienthal, Mayor
Karlee Meyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Russ Brown, Council Member
Linda Krupa, Council Member
Joe Males, Council Member

13.B

13.C

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Aug 09 2022
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Acting City Manager
Brenda Chavez, Executive Assistant;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

Eastern Municipal Water District Drought Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive a presentation from EMWD regarding the current drought update.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Hemet City Council Drought Update August 2022

13.D

1 | emwd.org
EMWD Drought Update
August 9, 2022

13.D

2 | emwd.org
California Drought Update

13.D

3 | emwd.org
Statewide Drought Conditions • 100 percent of California is in “moderate” or worse
drought conditions
• 2020-2021 was the hottest
two year stretch on record
• 2022 is driest start to any
calendar year on record Date: July 28, 2022

13.D

4 | emwd.org
Status of California’s Water Supply Sources • State Water Project water allocation began at zero percent – Currently at 5 percent allocation • Major reservoirs still well below
historic averages
• 2020-2022 is the lowest
consecutive three-year runoff total
in history
• 50 percent of statewide rainfall
typically occurs in January through
March – January 2022: 14 percent of normal – February 2022: 4 percent of normal – March 2022: 16 percent of normal

13.D

5 | emwd.org
Colorado River Supply • Lake Powell elevation has fallen to its lowest level since it was first filled – Full power production elevation: 3525 ft – Current elevation: 3539 feet • Lake Mead currently at 1042 feet elevation – Elevation in 2021: 1084 feet – At 1045 feet, MWD starts losing access to water stored in Lake Mead
– At 1025 feet, MWD loses all access to
water stored in Lake Mead
• USBR reduced deliveries from Lake Powell
Reservoir Capacity Percent Full
Lake Powell 6.41 MAF 28%
Lake Mead 7.12 MAF 27%

13.D

6 | emwd.org
New Water Supply Challenges • Snowpack in Upper Colorado River Basin is 90 percent of normal
• Runoff for Upper Basin is
71 percent of normal
• Climate change is resulting in
earlier spring blooms, further
reducing runoff into reservoirs
• Warmer springs are resulting in
faster snow melt and evaporation
• California is becoming more
dependent on atmospheric rivers
for its rain and snow
• Development of new facilities is
critical toward managing the
“new normal”
Date: July 28, 2022

13.D

7 | emwd.org
Drought Response

13.D

8 | emwd.org
State Drought Response • Executive Order N-7-22 signed on March 28, 2022 – Water agencies to advance to Level 2 of water shortage contingency plans • Encourages agencies to go beyond 20% to prepare for long-term drought – Enacted plans to ensure water shortage reduction up to 20% – Directed Department of Water Resources to develop strategies to improve water conservation
– Directed State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) to consider adoption of a nonfunctional turf regulation
• In May 2022, the State Board passed prohibition of
irrigation of nonfunctional turf for Commercial,
Institutional and Industrial customers with the following exceptions: – Shared irrigation device with trees or other perennial non-turf plants
– Certification that turf is low water use variation meeting certain requirements – Landscape irrigated with recycled water

13.D

9 | emwd.org
Regional Drought Response • MWD Emergency Water Shortage declared on April 26, 2022
• Reduced allocation has been
established for MWD agencies
most heavily dependent on SWP
supplies – Some agencies moved to
mandatory one day per week
irrigation beginning June 1, 2022
• These regulations do NOT currently apply to EMWD • MWD could expand regulations if water supply savings are not achieved by September 2022
• EMWD will continue to advocate for equitable regulations that account for factors such as proactive investments in reliability, population growth and regional climate variations

13.D

10 | emwd.org
EMWD Drought Response Actions • EMWD moved to Stage 3a of its Water Shortage Contingency Plan – Voluntary reduction of up to 25 percent encouraged through water use efficiency requirements such as:
• No variances or adjustments for filling swimming pools, establishing new landscapes, or leaks not repaired within 48 hours.
• Customers are encouraged to remain within their water budgets! • Upgraded water usage/billing system includes water use tracking capabilities to assist customers in understanding their water use and staying within their water budget
• Up to $3 per square foot rebate through EMWD, regional programs to remove turf.

EMWD’s customers have removed millions of square
feet of non-functional turf over the past decade!

13.D

11 | emwd.org
State Board Regulations • In May 2022, the State Board passed regulations prohibiting irrigation of nonfunctional turf – Applies to Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional (CII) properties irrigated by potable
water
– Allows irrigation on turf on the same valve as
trees, shrubs, and other perennial plants
– Excludes residential customers – Excludes parks, sports fields, and other turf used for recreation
– Excludes landscapes irrigated with recycled water – Excludes turf that is certified as a low water use variation meeting certain requirements

13.D

12 | emwd.org
How to Comply? • Direct landscapers to shut off irrigation to all eligible nonfunctional turf, but continue irrigating trees, shrubs and other perennial plants – EMWD can provide template letter to send to landscape personnel • Take advantage of EMWD’s rebates and programs – Commercial and Multi-Family Drip Rebate – Free Deep Drip Watering Stakes – Landscape Irrigation Survey – Public Agency Landscape Program – Water Savings Incentive Program – Large Commercial Landscape Program – SoCal Water$mart Rebates • Turf grass replacement – Accelerated Retrofit Program • HOAs – Please note: Fines cannot be assessed for residents who are not maintaining turf grass during a drought declaration

13.D

13 | emwd.org
What Can Residential Customers Do? • Customers are encouraged to focus efforts on outdoor
irrigation – EMWD’s Landscapes for Living
program offers resources,
including device rebates,
sample landscape plans, and
much more
– Reducing irrigation times by 2
minutes for every 10 minutes of
run time will provide significant
savings while maintaining plant
health
– Customers are encouraged to
maintain trees, shrubs and
other plants.

13.D

14 | emwd.org
Contact Information
Kevin Pearson
Public Affairs Officer
(951) 928-3777 Ext. 4219
[email protected]

13.D

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Aug 09 2022
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Veronica Allen, Management Analyst;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

Presentation on Board of State and Community Corrections, California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) Grant, Hemet Community Wide Collaborative: An Approach to Violence Reduction RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Receive a presentation on the Board of State and Community Corrections, California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant: Hemet Community Wide Collaborative: An Approach to Violence Reduction.

BACKGROUND:

On February 8, 2022, this item was presented to the Hemet City Council to approve the application for the California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) funds in the amount of $963,573 to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). BSCC awarded the City grant funding and on July 12, 2022, the Hemet City Council accepted the grant funding and authorized the City Manager to sign all documents. City Council requested a presentation on the City's CalVIP program.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

On July 12, 2022, this item was presented to the Hemet City Council to accept the Board of State and Community Corrections, California Violence Intervention and Prevention grant funds in the amount of $963,573 and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents. City Council approved by a vote of 5-0.

On February 8, 2022, this item was presented to the Hemet City Council to approve the application for the California Violence Intervention and Prevention (CalVIP) funds in the amount of $963,573 to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). City Council approved by a vote of 5-0.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

13.E

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

The proposed action aligns with Council Adopted Objective under Quality of Life.

Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

The proposed action aligns with Council Adopted Objective under Community Engagement.

Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

GOAL FOUR: PARTNERSHIP & COLLABORATION
To pursue partnerships that will increase the opportunities available to the community, including our businesses, unemployed, and youth populations.

The proposed action aligns with Council Adopted Objective under Partnership and Collaboration.

Objective 2: Develop concepts and programs to enhance the quality of life services.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this presentation.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1: CalVIP presentation August 9, 2022

13.E

Hemet City Council
Hemet’s CalVIP Grant Proposal – City Manager’s Office
August 9, 2022

13.E

Strategic Plan Integration
Quality of Life Partnership &
Collaboration
Organizational
Effectiveness
Community
Engagement
Economic
Opportunity
Select the Strategic Plan
objective that relates and
the related Action Item.

13.E

Housing Element Update
Background on CalVIP
• Assembly Bill (AB) 1603 – the Break the Cycle of Violence Act (October 11, 2019) • Established CalVIP grant program and BSCC authority to administer it. • CalVIP grants support evidence-based, violence-reduction initiatives in communities disproportionately impacted by violence.
• Specifically, “group-member involved” (gangs, crews, sets, etc.) homicides, shootings, and aggravated assaults

13.E

Housing Element Update
Hemet’s Successful Proposal
• A City “Office of Violence Prevention” (OVP) • A three-year $963,573 grant that funds:
a. A full-time program coordinator
b. A community-based agency to provide direct services
c. Training and Technical Assistance
d. Mandatory evaluation and reporting

13.E

Housing Element Update
OVP: Three Basic Goals

1. Reduce violence as measured by homicides and non-fatal injury shootings citywide.

2. Reduce recidivism for individuals at very highest risk of violence, as the first step in ongoing efforts to improve outcomes for this population.

3. Strengthen city – community relationships and cooperation (including the police department)

13.E

Housing Element Update
OVP: Three Basic Functions
OVP will be responsible for three activities:

1. Community Outreach: Engage community partners to play meaningful roles in outreach and social services.

2. Intervention and Life-coaching: Work with these partners on evidence-based relationship building and service efforts to ensure better outcomes for young people at highest risk of violence and make Hemet a safer city.

3. Program Accountability and Performance Management: Manage data collection and analysis – invest program resources where they will be most effective in reducing violence and ensure progress toward goals.

13.E

Housing Element Update
OVP has a Foundation in Proven
Interventions
Community-based programs that utilize credible messengers and cognitive-based therapy (CBT) enable people at very highest risk to make better decisions about their futures:

1. Credible messengers: trained community members with similar backgrounds that have successfully turned their lives around.

2. CBT: helping people make well-informed decisions about their safety and life goals.

13.E

Discussion & Follow Up

13.E

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Aug 09 2022
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Noah Rau, Public Works Director/City Engineer, Steve Loriso; ☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☒ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Hemet and Direct the Finance Director to Establish Total Project Appropriations per the CIP for New Requests Only RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Continue the Public Hearing and take testimony, if any; and

2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City of Hemet; and

3. Direct the Finance Director to establish total project appropriations per the CIP for new requests only.

BACKGROUND:

The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) of any City is a policy document that sets forth the City's program for identifying and completing large capital improvement projects, which is updated annually to ensure compliance with City Council, constituent's needs, and Strategic Plan. On August 10, 2021, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 through Fiscal Year 2022-2023 CIP document, with the promise by Staff that a multi-year CIP was in the works. This five-year CIP document fulfills that promise.

The proposed Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 CIP was presented on June 6, 2022, to the Infrastructure Commission.

The proposed Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 CIP was determined to be in conformance with the City’s General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65401 at the Planning Commission Meeting of May 17, 2022.

14.A

ANALYSIS:

Over the past several years, Engineering and Public Works have collaborated to review the existing CIP, closeout lingering projects, and develop a solid list of projects that will carry the City forward, while maintaining fiscal responsibility with available funding sources.

The proposed CIP includes over 90 projects, with an estimated budget of $71,540,000 for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 alone, across various departments, and an additional $35,360,000 through Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The revenue sources for these projects include the following:
• Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads (County 1/2 cent sales tax for transportation) • Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
• Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax (Gas Tax)
• Developer Impact Fees (DIF)
• Developer Deposits/Bond Proceeds
• Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
• Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
• Active Transportation Projects (ATP)
• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
• Measure "U" (City of Hemet Public Safety)
• Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District • City Sanitary Sewer
• City Water
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• National Fitness Campaign Grant
• Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Districts
• SB 821
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

On July 12, 2022, the Council opened the public hearing for the fiscal year 22/23 through fiscal year 26/27 CIP.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 1: The proposed action aligns with Council adopted objective: enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight by increasing the number of paved lane miles. Additionally, the CIP advances the public health, safety and general welfare of the community, and thereby serves the community’s interests.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The specific fiscal impacts by the fund are noted in the attached CIP, including those impacts to the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

14.A

Do not adopt the Resolution Approving the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Provide alternate direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1_ Reso-FY2022-2027
Attachment 2_ CIP-20220627-FINAL_FY22-23-FY26-27

14.A

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xxx

CITY OF HEMET
Hemet, California
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 THROUGH
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE

CITY OF HEMET AND DIRECT THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH

TOTAL PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS PER THE CIP FOR NEW

REQUESTS ONLY
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt and annually update a Capital Improvement Program to identify capital project and equipment purchases, provide a planning schedule and identify options for financing the plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Hemet Engineering and Public Works Departments prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027; and
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022, the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program was presented to the Planning Commission and was found to be in accordance with the City’s General Plan, as required by Government Code Section 65401; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2022, the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program was presented to the Infrastructure Commission and was recommended to be adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2022, the City Council opened a public hearing to consider the approval of the City’s Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year

14.A

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xxx
2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and heard and considered written and oral evidence submitted at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2022, the City Council continued the public hearing to consider the approval of the City’s Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and heard and considered additional written and oral evidence submitted at said hearing; and WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council Direct the Finance Director to establish total project appropriations per the CIP for new requests only; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby determines and finds that each proposed expenditure of public funds reflected in the proposed Capital Improvement Program advances the public health, safety or general welfare and thereby serves the community’s interests.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hemet does hereby resolve:

1. Based on the true and correct recital above incorporated by this reference herein, the recommended Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 Capital Improvement Program, filed with the City Clerk, is hereby approved, and adopted.

2. Direct the Finance Director to establish total project appropriations per the CIP for new requests only.

3. City staff has determined that the City of Hemet’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because the Plan is not a “project” as defined by CEQA, but involves the creation of government funding mechanisms or other

14.A

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xxx
government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. The City Council has reviewed City staff’s determination of exemption and, based on its own independent judgment, concurs with staff’s determination of exemption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August 2022. ____________________________
Malcolm Lilienthal, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
John Maier, City Clerk

14.A

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xxx
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 9th day of August 2022, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Member:

ABSTAIN: Council Member:

ABSENT: Council Member:
_________________________________
John Maier, City Clerk

14.A

14.A

City of Hemet
FY 2022/23 — FY 2026/27 Proposed
Capital Improvement Program
City of Hemet | FY 2022/23 — FY 2026/27 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

14.A

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

14.A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 — FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 CITY OF HEMET

CITY OF HEMET
445 E FLORIDA AVENUE
HEMET, CA 92543
951-765-2300
WWW.HEMETCA.GOV

CITY COUNCIL

MALCOLM LILIENTHAL, MAYOR

KARLEE MEYER, MAYOR PRO TEM

JOE MALES, COUNCIL MEMBER

RUSS BROWN, COUNCIL MEMBER

LINDA KRUPA, COUNCIL MEMBER

CITY STAFF

EDDIE PUST, ACTING CITY MANAGER

NOAH RAU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY

ENGINEER

LORENA ROCHA, FINANCE DIRECTOR

14.A

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

14.A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27
CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME PAGE NUMBER
NA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
NA PROJECT SUMMARY 3
NA FUNDING SUMMARY 7
5507 STATE STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS 11
5542 ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING (SAN JACINTO PROJECT) 12
5590 STATE STREET STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT 13
5592 WESTSIDE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN 14
5598 ECHO HILLS AND SANTA FE ST. WATER IMPROVEMENTS - PH. 3 15 5627 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT 16
5639 UPDATE DIF ANALYSIS 17
5651 LED SAFETY LIGHTING AND PED COUNTDOWN SIGNAL HEADS 18 5653 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS/RE-LINING 19
5655 ECHO HILLS TANK SITE AND WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS 20 5656 4" TO 8" WATER MAIN UPGRADE - TAYLOR, APRICOT AND HARVARD 21 5657 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS - ALLEY 1, RAMONA, ALESSANDRO, INEZ, ELMWOOD, CARMALITA, JUANITA, ALLEY 2 22 5659 STETSON AVE. WATER MAIN INSTALLATION, KIRBY TO LYON 23 5660 WATER DROP REPLACEMENTS - KIRBY ST. NEIGHBORHOODS 24 5661 OAKLAND AVE. AND SANTA FE ST. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT 25 5663 SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION 26
5668 INTERIM SEATTLE BASIN IMPROVEMENTS 27
5670 CHAMBERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 28
5676 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE MODULAR REPLACEMENT 29
5679 FIRE STATION FACILITY UPGRADES 30
5690 CITYWIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 31
5696 HEMET VALLEY BIKEWAY CONNECT 32
5697 MCSWEENY - PH. 1 PUNCHLIST 33
5698 MCSWEENY - PH. 2 MCSWEENY PKWY. CROSSING 34
5699 MCSWEENY - PH. 3 STATE ST. CROSSING 35
5704 2019/20 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 36
5706 ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING, WARREN TO SANDERSON 37
5708 2020/21 TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE 38
5709 2020/21 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (SAN JACINTO STREET) 39 5711 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE 40
5713 2020/21 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 41
5717 WELL 15 & 16 TREATMENT 42
5718 SKATEBOARD PARK AT GIBBEL PARK 43
5719 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS 44
5720 WELL SITE SECURITY FENCING (FIRE STATION #2) 45
5721 CLARIFIER UNITS FOR CORP. YARD 46
5722 2021/22 ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS 47
5723 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, WARREN AND DEVONSHIRE 48 5724 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL VISIBILITY UPGRADES 49
5725 2021/22 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD 50
5726 2021/22 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS, TBD 51 5727 2021/22 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, EL GRANDE ESTATES 52 5728 STATE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FRUITVALE TO ESPLANADE 53 5729 2021/22 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 54 5730 CATCH BASIN TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE INSTALLATION 55
5731 PARK STRUCTURE EVALUATION 56
5732 POLICE DEPARTMENT/PIO FACILITY UPGRADE 57
5733 FIRE STATION NO. 3 FACILITY SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 58 5734 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY 59
5735 NATIONAL FITNESS CAMPAIGN EQUIPMENT 60
TBD MARY HENLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 61
TBD BRUBAKER PARK IMPROVEMENTS 62
TBD CITYWIDE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 63

TABLE OF CONTENTS

14.A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27
CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME PAGE NUMBER

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TBD SOLAR POWERED STREET LIGHTS 64
TBD SIMPSON CENTER - ADA PARKING AND FIRE LANE IMPROVEMENTS 65 TBD BADGE READERS AT CITY FACILITIES 66
TBD LIBRARY VENTILATION IMPROVEMENTS 67
TBD TELEPHONE AND NETWORK MODERNIZATION 68
TBD CHILDREN'S PATIO AT LIBRARY 69
TBD REFRESH LIBRARY FIREWALL 70
TBD POLICE EXTERNAL SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES 71 TBD FIRE STATION FACILITY EVALUATION/RETROFIT/REMODEL, INTERNAL FIRE STATION SYSTEM UPGRADES 72 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD 73
TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 74 TBD 2022/23 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 75
TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 76 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 77 TBD WATER/SEWER SYSTEM GIS MAPPING 78
TBD TANK 4 RE-COAT 79
TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD 80
TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 81 TBD 2023/24 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 82 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 83 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 84 TBD TANK 1 RE-COAT 85
TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD 86
TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 87 TBD 2024/25 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 88 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 89 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 90 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD 91
TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 92 TBD 2025/26 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 93 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 94 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 95 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD 96
TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 97 TBD 2026/27 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 98 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 99 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD 100

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

TOTAL COST TO

COMPLETE
5507 STATE STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS WATER $ 490,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 490,000 5542 ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING (SAN JACINTO PROJECT) DEVELOPER $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 475,000 RCFC $ 1,570,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,570,000
5592 WESTSIDE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN DIF $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5598 ECHO HILLS AND SANTA FE ST. WATER IMPROVEMENTS - PH. 3 WATER $ 336,838 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 336,838 5627 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT WATER $ 1,670,570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,670,570 5639 UPDATE DIF ANALYSIS DIF $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 DIF $ - $ 79,466 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 79,466
HSIP $ 930,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 930,900
TOTAL $ 930,900 $ 79,466 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,010,366 5653 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS/RE-LINING SEWER $ 6,060,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,060,000 5655 ECHO HILLS TANK SITE AND WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS WATER $ 3,470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,470,000 5656 4" TO 8" WATER MAIN UPGRADE - TAYLOR, APRICOT AND HARVARD WATER $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 5657 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS - ALLEY 1, RAMONA, ALESSANDRO, INEZ, ELMWOOD, CARMALITA, JUANITA, ALLEY 2
WATER $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000
5659 STETSON AVE. WATER MAIN INSTALLATION, KIRBY TO LYON WATER $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 5660 WATER DROP REPLACEMENTS - KIRBY ST. NEIGHBORHOODS WATER $ - $ 240,000 $ 2,760,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 5661 OAKLAND AVE. AND SANTA FE ST. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT WATER $ 4,390,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,390,000 5663 SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION SEWER $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,000 5668 INTERIM SEATTLE BASIN IMPROVEMENTS DIF $ 194,603 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 194,603 5670 CHAMBERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS DIF $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 5676 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE MODULAR REPLACEMENT FACILITIES $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 5679 FIRE STATION FACILITY UPGRADES FACILITIES $ 57,222 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 57,222 5690 CITYWIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS RMRA $ 1,344,320 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,344,320 MEASURE 'A' $ 320,747 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 320,747 ATP $ 2,087,996 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,087,996
TOTAL $ 2,408,743 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,408,743
5697 MCSWEENY - PH. 1 PUNCHLIST CSCDA $ 363,314 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 363,314 5698 MCSWEENY - PH. 2 MCSWEENY PKWY. CROSSING CSCDA $ 2,080,227 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,080,227 5590 STATE ST. STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

PROJECT SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

LED SAFETY LIGHTING AND PED COUNTDOWN SIGNAL HEADS
56515696

HEMET VALLEY BIKEWAY CONNECT

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

TOTAL COST TO

COMPLETE
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

PROJECT SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5699 MCSWEENY - PH. 3 STATE ST. CROSSING CSCDA $ 4,274,665 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,274,665 MEASURE 'A' $ 1,685,363 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,685,363 RMRA $ 45,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,690 TOTAL $ 1,731,053 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,731,053
5706 ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING, WARREN TO SANDERSON TUMF $ 1,870,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,870,000 5708 ANNUAL TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE MEASURE 'A' $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 5709 2020/21 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION MEASURE 'A' $ 650,544 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,544 5711 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE MEASURE 'A' $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 5713 2020/21 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION RMRA $ 498,638 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 498,638 5717 WELL 15 & 16 TREATMENT WATER $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 PARKS $ 165,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,500 ARPA $ 1,950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,950,000 TOTAL $ 2,115,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,115,500
5719 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS WATER $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 5720 WELL SITE SECURITY FENCING (FIRE STATION #2) WATER $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 5721 CLARIFIER UNITS FOR CORP. YARD DIF $ 107,340 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 107,340 CDBG $ 257,572 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 257,572 MEASURE 'A' $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 357,572 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 357,572
5723 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, WARREN AND DEVONSHIRE DIF $ 390,000 $ 1,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000 5724 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL VISIBILITY UPGRADES HSIP $ 53,079 $ 245,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 298,879 5725 2021/22 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 5726 2021/22 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS, TBD MEASURE 'A' $ 1,992,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,992,500 5727 2021/22 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, EL GRANDE ESTATES RMRA $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 MEASURE 'A' $ 82,733 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 82,733 SB821 $ 248,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 248,200 TOTAL $ 330,933 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 330,933
5729 2021/22 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD SEWER $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 5730 CATCH BASIN TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE INSTALLATION STORM DRAIN $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000 5722
2021/22 ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS
5728

STATE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FRUITVALE TO ESPLANADE
5704
2019/20 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
5718

SKATEBOARD PARK AT GIBBEL PARK

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

TOTAL COST TO

COMPLETE
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

PROJECT SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARKS $ 19,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,000 PRE 218 LLMD $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000 POST 218 LLMD $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000 TOTAL $ 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,000
5732 POLICE DEPARTMENT/PIO FACILITY UPGRADES M.U. - POLICE $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 5733 FIRE STATION NO. 3 FACILITY SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS M.U. - FIRE $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 5734 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY M.U. - FIRE $ 745,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 745,000 5735 NATIONAL FITNESS CAMPAIGN EQUIPMENT NFC $ 151,275 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 151,275 TBD MARY HENLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS ARPA $ 696,215 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 696,215 TBD BRUBAKER PARK IMPROVEMENTS ARPA $ 1,032,035 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,032,035 TBD CITYWIDE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARPA $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 TBD SOLAR POWERED STREET LIGHTS ARPA $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 TBD SIMPSON CENTER - ADA PARKING AND FIRE LANE IMPROVEMENTS ARPA $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD BADGE READERS AT CITY FACILITIES ARPA $ 165,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000 TBD LIBRARY VENTILATION IMPROVEMENTS ARPA $ 1,052,473 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,052,473 TBD TELEPHONE AND NETWORK MODERNIZATION ARPA $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 TBD CHILDREN'S PATIO AT LIBRARY ARPA $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 TBD REFRESH LIBRARY FIREWALL ARPA $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD POLICE EXTERNAL SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES ARPA $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000

TBD FIRE STATION FACILITY EVALUATION/RETROFIT/REMODEL, INTERNAL

FIRE STATION SYSTEM UPGRADES
ARPA $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000
TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 TBD 2022/23 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION RMRA $ - $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,900,000 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD WATER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD SEWER $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 WATER $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000
SEWER $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000
TOTAL $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000
TBD TANK 4 RE-COAT WATER $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD

WATER/SEWER SYSTEM GIS MAPPING
5731

PARK STRUCTURE EVALUATION

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

TOTAL COST TO

COMPLETE
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

PROJECT SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TBD 2023/24 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD RMRA $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD WATER $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD SEWER $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD TANK 1 RE-COAT WATER $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ 1,750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,750,000 TBD 2024/25 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD WATER $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD SEWER $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD 2025/26 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,400,000 $ - $ - $ 2,400,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD WATER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD SEWER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD MEASURE 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD 2026/27 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,600,000 $ - $ 2,600,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD WATER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD SEWER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 TOTAL $ 61,685,558 $ 9,770,266 $ 10,965,000 $ 7,750,000 $ 8,200,000 $ $ 8,400,000 50,000 $ 106,820,824

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
5696 HEMET VALLEY BIKEWAY CONNECT $ 2,087,996 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,087,996 $ 2,087,996 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,087,996
5718 SKATEBOARD PARK AT GIBBEL PARK $ 1,950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,950,000 TBD MARY HENLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS $ 696,215 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 696,215 TBD BRUBAKER PARK IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,032,035 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,032,035 TBD CITYWIDE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 TBD SOLAR POWERED STREET LIGHTS $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 TBD SIMPSON CENTER - ADA PARKING AND FIRE LANE IMPROVEMENTS $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD BADGE READERS AT CITY FACILITIES $ 165,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000 TBD LIBRARY VENTILATION IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,052,473 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,052,473 TBD TELEPHONE AND NETWORK MODERNIZATION $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 TBD CHILDREN'S PATIO AT LIBRARY $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 TBD REFRESH LIBRARY FIREWALL $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD POLICE EXTERNAL SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000

TBD FIRE STATION FACILITY EVALUATION/RETROFIT/REMODEL, INTERNAL FIRE STATION SYSTEM UPGRADES $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 11,145,723 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,145,723
5722 2021/22 ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS $ 257,572 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 257,572 $ 257,572 $ - $ - $ - $ 257,572
5697 MCSWEENY - PH. 1 PUNCHLIST $ 363,314 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 363,314 5698 MCSWEENY - PH. 2 MCSWEENY PKWY. CROSSING $ 2,080,227 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,080,227 5699 MCSWEENY - PH. 3 STATE ST. CROSSING $ 4,274,665 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,274,665 $ 6,718,206 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,718,206
5542 ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING (SAN JACINTO PROJECT) $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 475,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 475,000
5592 WESTSIDE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5639 UPDATE DIF ANALYSIS $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 5651 LED SAFETY LIGHTING AND PED COUNTDOWN SIGNAL HEADS $ - $ 79,466 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 79,466 5668 INTERIM SEATTLE BASIN IMPROVEMENTS $ 194,603 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 194,603 5670 CHAMBERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 5721 CLARIFIER UNITS FOR CORP. YARD $ 107,340 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 107,340 FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

FUNDING SUMMARY

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CSCDA)DEVELOPER DEPOSITDEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA)

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

FUNDING SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5723 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, WARREN AND DEVONSHIRE $ 390,000 $ 1,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000 $ 1,011,943 $ 1,679,466 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,691,409 5676 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE MODULAR REPLACEMENT $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 5679 FIRE STATION FACILITY UPGRADES $ 57,222 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 57,222 $ 132,222 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 132,222
5651 LED SAFETY LIGHTING AND PED COUNTDOWN SIGNAL HEADS $ 930,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 930,900 5724 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL VISBILITY UPGRADES $ 53,079 $ 245,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 298,879 $ 983,979 $ 245,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,229,779
5696 HEMET VALLEY BIKEWAY CONNECT $ 320,747 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 320,747 5704 2019/20 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION $ 1,685,363 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,685,363 5708 2020/21 TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 5709 2020/21 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION $ 650,544 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,544 5711 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 5722 2021/22 ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 5725 2021/22 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 5726 2021/22 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ 1,992,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,992,500 5728 STATE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FRUITVALE TO ESPLANADE $ 82,733 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 82,733 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 1,750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,750,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ 750,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 4,961,887 $ 3,300,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,550,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 50,000 $ 19,761,887 5733 FIRE STATION NO. 3 FACILITY SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 5734 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY $ 745,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 745,000 $ 895,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 895,000

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)FACILITIES MAINTENANCEMEASURE 'A'MEASURE 'U' - FIRE

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

FUNDING SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5732 POLICE DEPARTMENT /PIO FACILITY UPGRADES $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000
5735 NATIONAL FITNESS CAMPAIGN EQUIPMENT $ 151,275 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 151,275 $ 151,275 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 151,275
5718 SKATEBOARD PARK AT GIBBEL PARK $ 165,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,500 5731 PARK STRUCTURE EVALUATION $ 19,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,000 $ 184,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 184,500
5731 PARK STRUCTURE EVALUATION $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000
5731 PARK STRUCTURE EVALUATION $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000
5590 STATE ST. STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT $ 1,570,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,570,000 $ 1,570,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,570,000
5690 CITYWIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,344,320 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,344,320 5704 2019/20 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION $ 45,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,690 5713 2020/21 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION $ 498,638 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 498,638 5727 2021/22 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, EL GRANDE ESTATES $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 TBD 2022/23 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION $ - $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,900,000 TBD 2023/24 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 TBD 2024/25 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 TBD 2025/26 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,400,000 $ - $ - $ 2,400,000 TBD 2026/27 SB1 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,600,000 $ - $ 2,600,000 $ 3,138,648 $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 2,600,000 $ - $ 14,238,648 5728 STATE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FRUITVALE TO ESPLANADE $ 248,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 248,200 $ 248,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 248,200
5653 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS/RE-LINING $ 6,060,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,060,000 5663 SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,000 5729 2021/22 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 POST-PROP 218 LLMDMEASURE 'U' - POLICESEWERNATIONAL FITNESS CAMPAIGNPRE-PROP 218 LLMDROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA)RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL (RCFC)SB 821PARKS

14.A

CIP
NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED
26/27

PROJECTED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
FY 2022/23 - FY 2026/27

FUNDING SUMMARY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD WATER/SEWER SYSTEM GIS MAPPING $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 7,720,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 15,470,000 5730 CATCH BASIN TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE INSTALLATION $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000
5706 ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING, WARREN TO SANDERSON $ 1,870,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,870,000 $ 1,870,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,870,000
5507 STATE STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS $ 490,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 490,000 5598 ECHO HILLS AND SANTA FE ST. WATER IMPROVEMENTS - PH. 3 $ 336,837 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 336,837 5627 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT $ 1,670,570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,670,570 5655 ECHO HILLS TANK SITE AND WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS $ 3,470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,470,000 5656 4" TO 8" WATER MAIN UPGRADE - TAYLOR, APRICOT AND HARVARD $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 5657 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS - ALLEY 1, RAMONA, ALESSANDRO, INEZ, ELMWOOD, CARMALITA, JUANITA, ALLEY 2 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 5659 STETSON AVE. WATER MAIN INSTALLATION, KIRBY TO LYON $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 5660 WATER DROP REPLACEMENTS - KIRBY ST. NEIGHBORHOODS $ - $ 240,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 5661 OAKLAND AVE. AND SANTA FE ST. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT $ 4,390,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,390,000 5717 WELL 15 & 16 TREATMENT $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 5719 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 5720 WELL SITE SECURITY FENCING (FIRE STATION #2) $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 TBD 2022/23 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD WATER/SEWER SYSTEM GIS MAPPING $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 TBD TANK 4 RE-COAT $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD 2023/24 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD TANK 1 RE-COAT $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 TBD 2024/25 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2025/26 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 TBD 2026/27 CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 17,972,407 $ 840,000 $ 4,610,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 29,422,407 $ 61,685,558 $ 9,770,266 $ 10,965,000 $ 7,750,000 $ 8,200,000 $ $ 8,400,000 50,000 $ 106,820,824

WATERSTORM DRAINTRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF)

2,760,000 $

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 5,000
Planning/Design $ 40,000
ROW
Construction $ 404,545
CM/Inspection $ 40,455
Other
Total Cost $ - $ - $ 490,000
WATER $ 490,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - $ - $ 490,000
Project Cost:

Source of Funds:

FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
5507
Public Works
Project Description/Justification:

Infrastructure
Water
$ 404,545
$ 40,455
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Construction of 24" Distribution Line on State Street to expand flow capacity. The 24" line will replace the existing 12" Asbestos Cement Pipe (ACP) main from Stetson Avenue to just north of Chambers Street with 24" C-905 (plastic pipe) to increase volume of water flow into and out of tanks more efficiently. The existing 12" water main will be plugged and abandoned in place. The 24" main from just north of Chambers Street to the access road up to the tanks was previously constructed while a new main from State Street up to the water tanks will be constructed per a separate project.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ 5,000
$ 40,000

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

STATE STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
Design
$ 490,000 $ -
$ 490,000 $ -
$ 490,000
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 4,750
Planning/Design $ 38,000
ROW
Construction $ 392,955
CM/Inspection $ 39,295
Other
Total Cost $ - $ 475,000 - $
DEVELOPER $ 475,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ 475,000 $ - $ 475,000 - $ - $
$ 475,000

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
5542
Public Works
Roads
Project Description/Justification:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING (SAN JACINTO PROJECT)
Design
Project Cost: COST

COMPLETE
Engineering
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
COST

COMPLETE
$ 4,750
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
This project entails the widening of Esplanade Ave. from Warren Rd. to Sanderson Ave. only on the north side of the street in San Jacinto Jurisdiction. The roadway will be widened to include 4 through lanes and a sidewalk on the north side. New traffic signals will be installed at the intersections of Warren Rd. and Cawston Rd. The project will provide safety for pedestrians and decrease traffic congestion. San Jacinto is the lead agency and minimal work will be done in the City of Hemet. However, improvements on the south side of Warren, including sidewalk will be completed as part of a separate project.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
$ 38,000
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
$ 39,295
$ 392,955
$ 475,000 $ -

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 15,700
Planning/Design $ 157,000
ROW
Construction $ 1,270,273
CM/Inspection $ 127,027
Other
Total Cost $ - $ 1,570,000 - $
Source of Funds:

RCFC $ 1,570,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ 1,570,000 $ - $ 1,570,000 - $ - $
$ 1,570,000
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
Project Description/Justification:
5590
Public Works
Infrastructure
Engineering
Design

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

STATE STREET STORM DRAIN REPLACEMENT
Project Cost: 26/27 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
$ 1,270,273
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
State Street Storm Drain Replacement pertains to the replacement of the existing storm drain line on State St. from Menlo Ave. to Esplanade Ave. This is a joint project with the City of San Jacinto (lead agency) and Riverside County. Replacement will prevent street failure, improve drainage in the immediate area, and provide safer roads during wet weather conditions. Riverside County Flood Control is funding the improvements.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
$ 15,700
$ 157,000

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
$ 127,027
$ 1,570,000

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - $ - - $
DIF $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - $ - $ - - $ - $
$ - $ -
$ -

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
$ -
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

WESTSIDE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
$ -
5592
Public Works
Project Description/Justification:

Infrastructure
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
Source of Funds:
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
Engineering
Planning
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The Westside Master Drainage Plan will provide drainage improvement methods for various locations within the City. Improvement of the City's drainage system will help transport water brought upon by rain to prevent flooding and better preserve the quality of City streets.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
$ -
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 2,500
Planning/Design $ 10,000
ROW
Construction $ 324,338
CM/Inspection $ -
Other
Total Cost $ - $ 336,838 - $
WATER $ 336,838
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - $ 336,838 - $
COST

COMPLETE
$ 336,838
$ 336,838 $ -
$ 10,000
$ 324,338
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The project will install a new 8" PVC line to replace the existing 4" steel line. The proposed 8" line will connect to an existing 8" PVC watermain. The existing 4" line will be abandoned in place. Installing the proposed line will help the City meet water demands of the surrounding area.

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
$ 2,500
Public Works
Water
Project Description/Justification:

Design
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
Infrastructure

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
ECHO HILLS AND SANTA FE ST. WATER IMPROVEMENTS - PH. 3
5598
$ 336,838 $ -
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 16,706
Planning/Design $ 167,057
ROW $ -
Construction $ 1,319,750
CM/Inspection $ 167,057
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,670,570 $
WATER $ 1,670,570
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,670,570 $

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
5627
$ 1,670,570 $ -
$ 167,057
$ 1,670,570 $ -

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
$ 1,670,570
Source of Funds:
$ 16,706
$ 167,057
$ 1,319,750
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Planning
Infrastructure
Public Works
Water
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Description/Justification:

Currently, three of the City's wells are offline due to non compliant nitrate levels.

Installation of a nitrate treatment system would bring the three offline wells back into service and would allow for the City to meet demand. In addition, much needed maintenance on current online wells may be performed if the three current offline wells are up and running.

LOCATION MAP
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ 300,000
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $
DIF $ 300,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

UPDATE DIF ANALYSIS
5639
$ 300,000 $ -
$ 300,000 $ -

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
$ 300,000
Source of Funds:
$ 300,000
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Planning
Infrastructure
All
NA
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Description/Justification:

The City relies on Development Impact Fees in order to fund new city facilities such as police, fire, general government, drainage systems and other infrastructure improvements necessary to support the new development. The City has not updated the current Development Impact Fees since 2006 and good management accounting practices recommend that DIFs should be updated every five years to reflect the current needs of the community as well as address increases in costs associated with the construction of the proposed improvements.

LOCATION MAP
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction $ 769,439
CM/Inspection $ 69,466 $ 230,927
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 79,466 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,010,366 $
DIF $ 79,466 $ 79,466
HSIP $ 930,900
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 79,466 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,010,366 $
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ 930,900
$ 161,461
$ 769,439
$ -
$ -
$ 930,900

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
$ 930,900
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
5651
Signals

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

LED SAFETY LIGHTING AND PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN SIGNAL HEADS Construction
Public Works
Engineering
Project Description/Justification:

Install LED luminaire safety lighting and pedestrian countdown signal heads at the signalized intersections on the following corridors: Cawtson Ave., Domenigoni Pkwy., Kirby St., Latham Ave., Lyon Ave., Sanderson Ave., State St., and Stetson St.; Mountain Ave. & Soboba St., Warren Rd. & Mustang Wy.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost: 26/27 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 60,600
Planning/Design $ 606,000
ROW $ -
Construction $ 4,903,091
CM/Inspection $ 490,309
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,060,000 $
SEWER $ 6,060,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ 6,060,000 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,060,000 $ - $ $ 6,060,000
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CITYWIDE SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENTS/RE-LINING
Project Description/Justification:
5653
Public Works
Infrastructure
$ 6,060,000 $ -
$ 4,903,091
$ 490,309
COST

COMPLETE
Project Cost:

Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
$ 606,000
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
$ 60,600
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Annually reline or repair existing sewer main lines to provide adequate protection to the City's sewer infrastructure and to address areas previously identified as deteriorating or in need of serious maintenance. City runs the risk of the weakest points in infrastructure becoming in violation of State of CA and Riverside Public Health Department requirements. Failed infrastructure can result in system back ups and ground water contamination. This project will be constructed in several phases with Phase 1 already completed.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Wastewater
Construction

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 34,700
Planning/Design $ 277,600
ROW $ -
Construction $ 2,880,100
CM/Inspection $ 277,600
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,470,000
WATER $ 3,470,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,470,000
$ 277,600
5655
Public Works
Project Description/Justification:

Infrastructure
Water
$ 34,700
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
COST

COMPLETE
Design

ECHO HILLS TANK SITE AND WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Cost: 26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The addition of a third tank at the Echo Hills site will provide the Water Division the ability to pump during off-peak time at a reduced energy rate. The addition of a 2 million gallon storage capacity would also provide water for improved fire protection and meet the Department of Water Resources recommended storage capcity for the City to meet supply needs on its highest demand days. This project will also construct a new 24" line from the water tanks to the existing 24" main on State St.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
COST

COMPLETE
$ -
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Source of Funds:
$ 3,470,000
$ 3,470,000
$ 3,470,000

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ 2,880,100
$ 277,600
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 7,500
Planning/Design $ 60,000
ROW $ -
Construction $ 622,500
CM/Inspection $ 60,000
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $
WATER $ 750,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $
$ 60,000
$ 7,500
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
$ 622,500
$ 60,000
$ 750,000 $ -
$ 750,000 $ -
$ 750,000
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
Water
5656
Public Works
Infrastructure
Project Description/Justification:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4" TO 8" WATER MAIN UPGRADE - TAYLOR, APRICOT, AND HARVARD Design
COST

COMPLETE
The project will upgrade undersized 4" mainlines up to standard with an 8" mainline. This will supply enough flow and pressure and provide adequate fire protection. Areas to be addressed through this project include Taylor, Apricot, and Harvrd.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost:
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 12,000 $ $ 12,000
Planning/Design 96,000 $ $ 96,000
ROW $ -
Construction 996,000 $ $ 996,000
CM/Inspection 96,000 $ $ 96,000
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $
WATER 1,200,000 $ $ 1,200,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $ - $

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITYWIDE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS - ALLEY 1, RAMONA, ALESSANDRO, INEZ, ELMWOOD, CARMALITA, JUANITA, ALLEY 2 Project Cost:
5657
Public Works
Infrastructure
Project Description/Justification:
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
Planning
Water
The project calls for the replacement of aging water mains. The project will allow the City to maintain its overall water system to mitigate against corrosion and health risks that come with aging water mains.

COST

COMPLETE
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 4,500 $ $ 4,500
Planning/Design 36,000 $ $ 36,000
ROW $ -
Construction 373,500 $ $ 373,500
CM/Inspection 36,000 $ $ 36,000
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 $
WATER 450,000 $ $ 450,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 $ - $
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
Water
5659
Public Works
Infrastructure
Project Description/Justification:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
STETSON AVE. WATER MAIN INSTALLATION, KIRBY TO LYON
Design
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The project calls for the installation of approximately 3,440 feet of 12" C-900 along the storm drain channel on Stetson Ave. The installation of the main will allow even water distribution throughout the system and help with blending water from wells that have water quality challenges. Completion of this project is necessary to support future water capacity from restored operation of wells 4 and 14.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost:

COST

COMPLETE
$ -
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Planning/Design $ 240,000 $ 240,000
ROW $ -
Construction $ 2,490,000 $ 2,490,000
CM/Inspection $ 240,000 $ 240,000
Other $ -
Total Cost $ $ - 240,000
2,700,000
$ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000
WATER $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ 3,000,000 - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 26/27 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
COST

COMPLETE

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WATER DROP REPLACEMENTS - KIRBY ST. NEIGHBORHOODS
Water
Project Cost:
5660
Public Works
Infrastructure
Project Description/Justification:
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Design
The project will replace water lines installed under existing storm drain infrastructure that have experienced constant failures in the weld joints. The water main lines are constructed of cement mortar lined steel pipes that were cut at installation to angle under the pipe around existing storm drain facilities. These weld joints have been failing (3 to 5 years) due to water deteriorating exposed weld joints inside of the pipe bends.

These drops vary in depth and pipe size. Depths are from 4 to over 14 feet. Sizes are from 8 to 12 inches. The project area includes residential areas in the vicinity of Sanderson Ave on the west, Stetson Ave on the south and Santa Teresa Way on the east.

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

$ 2,700,000
$ 2,760,000

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 3,900 $ $ 3,900
Planning/Design 40,000 $ $ 40,000
ROW $ -
Construction 3,951,000 $ $ 3,951,000
CM/Inspection 395,100 $ $ 395,100
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 4,390,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,390,000 $
WATER 4,390,000 $ $ 4,390,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 4,390,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,390,000 $ - $ 25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
OAKLAND AVE. AND SANTA FE ST. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
Project Cost:
5661
Public Works
Infrastructure
Project Description/Justification:

Design
Water
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
The City maintains an existing Cement Mortar Lined and Coated steel pipe that runs from the Park Hill Tank site to Florida Ave. Over the last five years the water main has had several failures due to deterioration of the internal steel liner. This main line is critical for delivering water from the Park Hill well/storage site throughout the system, and has become difficult to spot repair due to the age of the pipe, and metal fatigue.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ 1,600 $ 1,600
Planning/Design $ 16,000 $ 16,000
ROW $ -
Construction $ 126,400 $ 126,400
CM/Inspection $ 16,000 $ 16,000
Other $ -
Total Cost $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,000
SEWER $ 160,000 $ 160,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,000
Project Description/Justification:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION
5663
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
$ -
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The City has identified several existing sewer manholes that are broken/damaged throughout the sewer system. This project will provide funding to rehabilitate these manholes.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Design
Infrastructure
Public Works
Wastewater

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 1,946 $ $ 1,946
Planning/Design 192,657 $ $ 192,657
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 194,603 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 194,603 $
DIF 194,603 $ $ 194,603
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 194,603 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 194,603 $

LOCATION MAP
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Infrastructure
Project Description/Justification:

Planning
Engineering
The project will improve the Seattle Basin to help address the City's westside drainage and flooding problems. These improvements are being coordinated with the Westside Master Drainage Plan Update.
$ -
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

INTERIM SEATTLE BASIN IMPROVEMENTS
Project Cost:
5668
Public Works
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 200 $ $ 200
Planning/Design 19,800 $ $ 19,800
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $
DIF $ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
$ -

CHAMBERS STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
5670
Public Works
Infrastructure
Project Cost:

Planning
Project Description/Justification:

Engineering
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The project will improve drainage on Chambers St. from State St. to Lyon Ave.

Improving the drainage will help transport water brought upon rain to prevent flooding and better preserve the street.

COST

COMPLETE
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other 75,000 $ $ 75,000
Total Cost $ - 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $
FACILITIES 75,000 $ $ 75,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $
Project Description/Justification:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE MODULAR REPLACEMENT
5676
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
$ -
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The project will replace the existing modular office building at the Corp Yard. The existing building is over 35 years old and has exceeded its useful life. The building has been tested and identified as containing mold in all sections. The structure has since been red tagged and is no longer occupiable. Cost estimation shows that building replacement would be more cost effective than abatement and repair of the existing building. A new building would allow for a new conference room with ADA compliant meeting space.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Planning
Facilities
Public Works
Facilities Maintenance

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 57,222 $ $ 57,222
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 57,222 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 57,222 $
FACILITIES 57,222 $ $ 57,222
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 57,222 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 57,222 $
Project Description/Justification:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

FIRE STATION FACILITY UPGRADES
5679
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
$ -
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Upgrades to Fire Station 1, 2, and 3 facilities to replace dilapidated cabinetry, inefficient appliances, and working surfaces. The 24-hour activity of the Fire Stations create wear and tear in the kitchen areas. The kitchen areas have suffered past termite and water damage. Although several repairs have been done over the years to extend the useful life of surfaces, cabinetry, and equipment, the kitchen areas are now beyond repair.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Closeout
Facilities
Fire

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 13,443 $ $ 13,443
Planning/Design 107,546 $ $ 107,546
ROW $ -
Construction 1,112,119 $ $ 1,112,119
CM/Inspection 111,212 $ $ 111,212
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 1,344,320 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,344,320 $
RMRA 1,344,320 $ $ 1,344,320
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 1,344,320 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,344,320 $ - $ FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

CITYWIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
5690
Public Works
Roads
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Design
Project Description/Justification:

Engineering

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The project will provide rehabilitation to streets outlined in Districts 1, 4, and 5. The rehabilitation of these streets will provide vehicle safety and help the City maintain its roads.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 15,000 $ $ 15,000
Planning/Design 10,000 $ $ 10,000
ROW $ -
Construction 2,086,747 $ $ 2,086,747
CM/Inspection 199,000 $ $ 199,000
Other 97,996 $ $ 97,996
Total Cost $ - 2,408,743 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,408,743 $
MEASURE 'A' 320,747 $ $ 320,747
ATP 2,087,996 $ $ 2,087,996
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 2,408,743 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,408,743 $
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Design

HEMET VALLEY BIKEWAY CONNECT
Project Cost:
5696
Public Works
Roads
Project Description/Justification:

Install Class II and Class III bicycle facilities, bicycle detection, bike boxes, bike lockers, bike repair stations, sidewalk, curb, gutter, curb ramps, and transportation mobility station with bicycle staging area, complimenting neighboring projects. A community outreach campaign is included to promote safety and healthy lifestyle goals. The project is located on Palm Avenue and Gilbert Street, Johnston Avenue between Palm Avenue and Gilbert Street, Gilbert Street between Whittier Avenue and Chambers Street, Chambers Street between Gilbert Street and State Street.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Engineering
$ -
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction 363,314 $ $ 363,314
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 363,314 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 363,314 $
CSCDA 363,314 $ $ 363,314
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 363,314 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 363,314 $
Project Cost:
5697
Public Works
Roads & Signals
Project Description/Justification:

Construction
The project will complete Phase 1 of McSweeny Farms punchlist items. The work will include the removal and reconstruction of failed asphalt concrete pavement, plcaement of slurry seal, and replacement of traffic striping located on State Street, South Village Loop, and Newport Road at the locations indicated on the map. As well as the installation of two new traffic signals at the intersections of State St & McSweeny Pkwy and State Street & South Village Loop.

COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Engineering
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MCSWEENY - PH. 1 PUNCHLIST
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
$ -
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction 2,080,227 $ $ 2,080,227
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 2,080,227 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,080,227 $
CSCDA 2,080,227 $ $ 2,080,227
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 2,080,227 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,080,227 $
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
The project consists of completing McSweeny Parkway Crossing (Phase 2). The work will include the construction of concrete culvert structure within Cactus Valley Channel to allow the permanent construction of McSweeny Parkway over Cactus Valley Channel, along with road, landscape and hardscape improvements along McSweeny Parkway.

LOCATION MAP
5698
Public Works
Infrastructure & Roads
Project Description/Justification:

Construction
Engineering
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
$ -

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MCSWEENY - PH. 2 MCSWEENY PKWY. CROSSING

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
Project Cost: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction 4,274,665 $ $ 4,274,665
CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 4,274,665 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,274,665 $
CSCDA 4,274,665 $ $ 4,274,665
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 4,274,665 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,274,665 $ - $

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MCSWEENY - PH. 3 STATE ST. CROSSING
Project Cost:
5699
Public Works
Infrastructure & Roads
Project Description/Justification:

Construction
Engineering
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
The Project consists of construction of the Cactus Valley Channel crossing State Street.

The work will include the construction of concrete culvert structure (within Cactus Valley Channel) to allow the permanent construction of State Street over Cactus Valley Channel, along with road, landscape and hardscape improvements along State Street.

COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 17,311 $ $ 17,311
Planning/Design 138,484 $ $ 138,484
ROW $ -
Construction 1,432,053 $ $ 1,432,053
CM/Inspection 143,205 $ $ 143,205
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 1,731,053 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,731,053 $
MEASURE 'A' 1,685,363 $ $ 1,685,363
RMRA 45,690 $ $ 45,690
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 1,731,053 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,731,053 $
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
$ -
$ -
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Engineering
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2019/20 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Project Cost:
5704
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Public Works
Roads
Project Description/Justification:

Design & Close out
The project will provide rehabilitation to streets outlined in Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4. The rehabilitation of these streets will provide vehicle safety and help the City maintain its roads. This project is being completed in three phases.

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 18,700 $ $ 18,700
Planning/Design 149,600 $ $ 149,600
ROW $ -
Construction 1,552,100 $ $ 1,552,100
CM/Inspection 149,600 $ $ 149,600
Other $ -
Total Cost $ - 1,870,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,870,000 $
TUMF 1,870,000 $ $ 1,870,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 1,870,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,870,000 $ - $ Project Cost:
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE
$ -

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
Design
Project Description/Justification:

Engineering
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ESPLANADE AVE. WIDENING, WARREN TO SANDERSON
5706
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
This project entails the widening of Esplanade Ave. from Warren Rd. to Sanderson Ave. only on the south side of the street in the City's Jurisdiction. The roadway will already be widened to 4 through lanes with the San Jacinto project with a sidewalk on the north side. This project will provide a paved shoulder and sidewalk on the south side. The project will provide safety for pedestrians and decrease traffic congestion.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
Public Works
Roads

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction $ 50,000 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ CM/Inspection $ -
Other $ -
Total Cost $ 50,000 - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ MEASURE 'A' $ 50,000 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ 50,000 - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 50,000
$ 50,000

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
5708
Public Works
Project Description/Justification:

Construction
Project Cost:

Roads
Streets
The project will provide the replacement of painted or thermoplastic traffic lanes, parking lanes, markings and crosswalks as well as the placement of raised pavement markers as required. This will increase vehicle and pedestrian safety.

COST

COMPLETE
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027

ANNUAL TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST
$ 50,000

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration 6,505 $ $ 6,505
Planning/Design 52,044 $ $ 52,044
ROW $ - $ -
Construction 539,952 $ $ 539,952
CM/Inspection 52,044 $ $ 52,044
Other $ - $ -
Total Cost $ - 650,544 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,544 $
MEASURE 'A' 650,544 $ $ 650,544
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 650,544 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,544 $ - $
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
5709
Public Works
Project Description/Justification:
2020/21 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
$ -
Construction
Roads
Engineering
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost:

Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The project will provide rehabilitation to various streets within the City. The rehabilitation of these streets will provide vehicle safety and help the City maintain its roads. Streets to be included are currently being evaluated, however, will include a partner project with Riverside County for San Jacinto Street. 23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST

14.A

Project Number:

Category:

Department:

Division:

Project Status:

Administration $ -
Planning/Design $ -
ROW $ -
Construction $ -
CM/Inspection $ -
Other 90,000 $ $ 90,000
Total Cost $ - 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 $
MEASURE 'A' 90,000 $ $ 90,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Cost $ - 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ - $
FY 2022/2023 - FY 2026/2027
5711
Public Works
Project Description/Justification:

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
$ -
Planning
Roads
Engineering
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
Project Cost:

Source of Funds: PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS
22/23 NEW

REQUEST

PREVIOUSLY

APPROPRIATED
26/27 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
COST

COMPLETE
COST

COMPLETE

PROJECTED

FUTURE YEARS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The City’s streets have not been thoroughly evaluated since either 2014 or 2016. This project will evaluate the condition of all existing City maintained streets and prepare a report prioritizing the City’s future pavement maintenance and rehabilitation efforts. A pavement management program is necessary to efficiently spend the City’s limited pavement maintenance and rehabilitation dollars.

LOCATION MAP
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST
25/26 NEW

REQUEST
23/24 NEW

REQUEST
24/25 NEW

REQUEST