Cities Index.
Agenda packet

San Jacinto City Council
November 15, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
November 15, 2022
Body
San Jacinto City Council
Pages
266
Original file
366.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanjacintoca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

The Act, and related amendments to California law, require that all groundwater basins designated as high- or mediumGroundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) program and that are subject to critical overdraft conditions must be managed under a new Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), or a coordinated set of GSPs, by January 31, 2020. High- and medium-priority basins that are not subject to critical overdraft conditions must be managed under a GSP by January 31, 2022. Where GSPs are required, one or more local groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) must be formed to cover the basin and prepare and implement applicable GSPs. The Act does not apply to basins that are managed under a court-approved adjudication, or to low-or very-low-priority basins.

A GSA has the authority to require registration of groundwater wells, measure and manage extractions, require reports and assess fees, and to request revisions of basin boundaries, including establishing new subbasins. The preparation of a GSP by a GSA is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Each GSP must include a physical description of the covered basin, such as groundwater levels, groundwater quality, subsidence, information on groundwater-surface water interaction, data on historical and projected water demands and supplies, monitoring and management provisions, and a description of how the plan would affect other plans, including city and county general plans.

The Act
table in which the soil is completely saturated with water but does not include water that flows in known -h). GSPs are reviewed by the DWR to
by the Act, sustainable groundwater management means that groundwater uses within basins managed Chronic lowering of groundwater levels (not including overdraft during a drought, if a basin is otherwise managed);
Significant and unreasonable reductions in groundwater storage; Significant and unreasonable seawater intrusion;
Significant and unreasonable degradation of water quality; Significant and unreasonable land subsidence; and
Surface water depletions that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial uses (Water Code Section 10721(w)).

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2528 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-23 Utilities and Service Systems Water Conservation Act of 2009
Water Code Sections 10800, et seq. creates a framework for future planning and actions by urban (and agricult
reduce Statewide per capita water consumption by 20 percent by 2020. Additionally, the State is required to make incremental progress towards this goal by reducing per capita water use by at least 10 percent by 2015. Each urban retail water supplier was required to develop water use targets and an interim water use target by July 1, 2011. Each urban retail water supplier was required, by July 2011, to include in their water management plan the baseline daily per capita water use, water use target, interim water use target, and compliance daily per capita water use.

Efficiency Standards
CCR Title 24 contains the California Building Standards, including the California Plumbing Code (Part 5), which promotes water conservation. CCR Title 20 addresses Public Utilities and Energy and includes appliance efficiency standards that promote water conservation. In addition, several California laws listed below require water-efficient plumbing fixtures in structures:

CCR Title 20 Section 1604(g) establishes efficiency standards that give the maximum flow rate of all new showerheads, lavatory faucets, sink faucets, and tub spout diverters; CCR Title 20 Section 1606 prohibits the sale of fixtures that do not comply with established efficiency regulations;
CCR Title 24 Sections 25352(i) and (j) address pipe insulation requirements, which can reduce water used before hot water reaches equipment or fixtures. Insulation of water-heating systems is also required; and
Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3 requires low-flush toilets and urinals in virtually all buildings.

Urban Water Management Planning Act
The Urban Water Management Planning Act has as its objectives the management of urban water demands and the efficient use of urban water. Under its provisions, every urban water supplier is required public or private
water supplier that provides water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 AF of water annually. The plan must identify and quantify the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier, quantify the projected water use for a water demand management measures. The urban water
supplier should make every effort to ensure the appropriate level of reliability in its water service sufficient to meet the needs of its various categories of customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. The Department of Water Resources must receive a copy of an adopted urban water management plan.

Senate Bill (SB) 610 and Assembly Bill (AB) 901
The State Legislature passed SB 610 and AB 901 in 2001. Both measures modified the Urban Water Management Planning Act.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2529 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-24 Utilities and Service Systems SB 610 requires additional information in an urban water management plan if groundwater is identified as a source of water available to an urban water supplier. It also requires that the plan include a description of all water supply projects and programs that may be undertaken to meet total projected water use. SB 610 requires a city or county that determines a project is subject to CEQA to identify any public water system that may supply water to the project and to request identified public water systems to prepare a specified water supply assessment. The assessment must include, among other information, an identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, or water service contracts relevant to the identified water supply for the proposed project, and water received in prior years pursuant to these entitlements, rights, and contracts.

AB 901 requires an urban water management plan to include information, to the extent practicable, relating to the quality of existing sources of water available to an urban water supplier over given time periods. AB 901 also requires information on the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability. The bill requires a plan to describe plans to supplement a water source that may not be available at a consistent level of use, to the extent practicable. Additional findings and declarations relating to water quality are required.

Senate Bill (SB) 221
SB 221 adds Government Code Section 66455.3, requiring that the local water agency be sent a copy of any proposed residential subdivision of more than 500 dwelling units within five days of the subdivision application being accepted as complete for processing by the city or county. It also adds Government Code Section 66473.7, establishing detailed requirements for establishing exists to support any proposed residential subdivisions of more than 500 dwellings, including any such subdivision involving a development agreement. When approving a qualifying subdivision tentative map, the city or county must include a condition requiring availability of a sufficient water supply. The applicable public water system must provide proof of availability. If there is no public water system, the city or county must undertake the analysis described in Government Code Section 66473.7. The analysis must include consideration of effects on other users of water and groundwater.

Local
City of San Jacinto 2020 Urban Water Management Plan
The City of San Jacinto is an urban water supplier that provides water and wastewater services to a portion of the City. The UWMP provides urban water suppliers (including the City) with a reliable management action plan for long-term resource planning to ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water supply needs. In addition, the 2020 UMWP incorporates water supply reliability determinations resulting from potential prolonged drought, regulatory revisions, and/or changing climatic conditions.

Eastern Municipal Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan EMWD provides potable water, recycled water, and wastewater services to an area of approximately 555 square miles in western Riverside County. EMWD is both a retail supplier, selling to residential and commercial customers, and a wholesale supplier, selling to other water agencies. The 2020 UWMP addresses the water supply sources, projected demands, and supply reliability for EMWD.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2530 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-25 Utilities and Service Systems Lake Hemet Municipal Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan LHMWD is an urban water supplier that provides water and wastewater services to a portion of the City.

The UWMP provides urban water suppliers (including the City) with a reliable management action plan for long-term resource planning to ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water supply needs.

City of San Jacinto Municipal Code
The San Jacinto Municipal Code, Chapter 13.44, Storm Water Management, and the following Municipal Code sections address water supply and conservation.

Municipal Code Section 13.04.070, Rationing of Water Authority, establishes a water conservation and supply shortage project that reduce water consumption within the City through conservation, enabling of effective water supply planning, assuring reasonable and beneficial use of water, preventing waste of water, and maximizing the efficient use of water within the City.

SJDC Chapter 17.325, Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation, addresses landscaping requirements and water-efficient landscaping standards throughout the City. SJDC Section 17.325.060, Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements, requires project applicants proposing new or rehabilitated landscape subject to Chapter 17.325 to submit a landscape and irrigation package (Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package) to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or other final City approval for the project site. The Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package includes an irrigation design plan and grading design plan to ensure efficient use of water and minimize soil erosion, runoff, and water waste. SJDC Section 17.325.110, Recycled Water, requires that recycled/reclaimed water be utilized for landscaping and irrigation whenever available, and that reclaimed irrigation equipment be specified on the landscape plans.

Municipal Code Section 17.600.100, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, requires new developments or modifications to existing development to be designed to control pollutants in storm water and urban runoff in order to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of receiving waters. The City Engineer will have the authority to approve the Best Management Practices (BMPs).

Groundwater Management Plan (GWMP)
The San Jacinto Basin is identified as Basin Number 8-005 pursuant to DWR Bulletin 118. Pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 (SGMA), the San Jacinto Basin was designated a high- -San
Jacinto Watermaster submits its Annual Report to DWR and will need to develop a GSP. SGMA requires the San Jacinto Basin be managed by a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) by 2022, and that a GSP tern portion
of the San Jacinto Basin (West San Jacinto GSA) on April 24, 2017.

In April 2013, a Stipulated Judgment (Judgment), Case Number RIC 1207274, was entered with the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside adopting the GWMP and creating the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster. The Judgment declares individual water rights of EMWD, LHMWD, Cities

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2531 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-26 Utilities and Service Systems of Hemet and San Jacinto, and other private groundwater pumpers, to groundwater in 1) the Canyon Subbasin, 2) the San Jacinto Upper Pressure Sub-basin downstream to Bridge Street, and 3) the Hemet Subbasin. These sub-basins are collectively called the Management Area and are located in the San Jacinto Valley. The Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster Board is the governing body for the Management Area. - actual production. Carry-over credits can be used to reduce the amount of water for which a Replenishment Assessment must be paid. Carryover credits can also be transferred to the Watermaster or another public agency. Carryover credits may be retained for more than one calendar year.

WASTEWATER
Federal
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 United States Code Section 1251 et seq.) is the cornerstone of water quality protection in the United States. The statute employs a variety of regulatory and non-regulatory tools to sharply reduce direct pollutants discharges into waterways, finance municipal wastewater treatment facilities, and manage polluted runoff. These tools are employed to achieve the broader goal of restoring and maintaining the chemical, physical, and biological integrit United States Environmental Protection Agency n.d.).
-point source
municipal sewage plants and industrial facilities. The CWA makes it illegal to discharge pollutants from a point source to the waters of the United States. CWA Section 402 creates the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulatory program. Point sources must obtain a discharge permit from the proper authority (usually a state, sometimes EPA, a tribe, or a territory). NPDES permits cover industrial and municipal discharges, discharges from storm sewer systems in larger cities, storm water associated with numerous kinds of industrial activity, runoff from construction sites disturbing more than one acre, mining operations, and animal feedlots and aquaculture facilities above certain thresholds.

All sothat sends its wastewater into a city sewer system, so it eventually goes to a sewage treatment plant. program.

State
State Water Resources Control Board/Regional Water Quality Control Board In California, all wastewater treatment and disposal systems fall under the overall regulatory authority of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the nine California Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs), who are charged with the responsibility of protecting beneficial uses of State waters (ground and surface) from a variety of waste discharges, including wastewater from individual and municipal systems. The Study Area falls within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2532 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-27 Utilities and Service Systems policies. These are
criteria and/or prohibitions related to the siting, design, construction, and maintenance of on-site sewage f providing overall direction, organizational
and technical assistance, and a communications link to the State legislature.

The RWQCBs may waive or delegate regulatory authority for on-site sewage disposal systems to counties, cities or special districts. Although not mandatory, it is commonly done and has proven to be administratively efficient. In some cases, this is accomplished through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), whereby the local agency commits to enforcing the Basin Plan requirements or other specified standards that may be more restrictive. The RWQCBs generally elect to retain permitting authority over large and/or commercial or industrial on-site sewage disposal systems, depending on the volume and character of the wastewater.

Local
2018 Sewer Master Plan Update
The City of San Jacinto an
infrastructure; and presents a capital improvement plan schedule and cost estimates of potential system improvements.

City of San Jacinto Municipal Code
Title 13, Public Services, of the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code includes regulations related to sewer service fees and charges, sewer construction standards, sewer connection requirements, sewer system extensions, and the registration of sewer contractors.

Material protection measures, as described in Municipal Code Chapter 13.28, Sewer Construction Standards, are required during all construction activities and/or as requirements to obtain coverage under the applicable NPDES General Construction Activities Stormwater Permit and State Water Board 401 Water Quality Certification. The NPDES permit requires the preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) identifying BMPs to control surface runoff, erosion, and sedimentation.

STORMWATER AND FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES
Federal
Clean Water Act
The CWA, initially passed in 1972, regulates the discharge of pollutants into watersheds throughout the nation. Section 402(p) of the act establishes a framework for regulating municipal and industrial stormwater discharges under the NPDES Program. Section 402(p) requires that stormwater associated with industrial activity that discharges either directly to surface waters or indirectly through municipal separate storm sewers must be regulated by an NPDES permit.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2533 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-28 Utilities and Service Systems The SWRCB is responsible for implementing the CWA and does so through issuing NPDES permits to cities and counties through regional water quality control boards. Federal regulations allow two permitting options for storm water discharges (individual permits and general permits). Pursuant to Section 402 of the CWA and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, municipal stormwater discharge in the City of San Jacinto is subject to the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) of the MS4 Permit (R8-2010-0033) and NPDES Permit No. CAS618033.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits are required for discharges to navigable waters of the United States, which includes any discharge to surface waters, including lakes, rivers, streams, bays, oceans, dry stream beds, wetlands, and storm sewers that are tributary to any surface water body. NPDES permits are issued under the CWA, Title IV, Permits and Licenses, Section 402 (33 USC 466 et seq.).

The RWQCB issues these permits in lieu of direct issuance by the Environmental Protection Agency, subject to review and approval by the EPA Regional Administrator (EPA Region 9). The terms of these including pre-treatment, sludge management, effluent limitations for specific industries, and antidegradation. In general, the discharge of pollutants is to be eliminated or reduced as much as practicable Technically, all NPDES permits issued by the RWQCB are also Waste Discharge Requirements issued under the authority of the CWA.

These NPDES permits regulate discharges from publicly owned treatment works, industrial discharges, stormwater runoff, dewatering operations, and groundwater cleanup discharges. NPDES permits are issued for five years or less, and therefore must be updated regularly. To expedite the permit issuance process, the RWQCB has adopted several general NPDES permits, each of which regulates numerous discharges of similar types of wastes. The SWRCB has issued general permits for stormwater runoff from construction sites statewide. Stormwater discharges from industrial and construction activities in San Jacinto can be covered under these general permits, which are administered jointly by the SWRCB and RWQCB.

Construction throughout the City of San Jacinto could disturb more than one acre of land surface for centralized and regional structural BMPs (and possibly for those distributed structural BMPs larger than one acre), affecting the quality of stormwater discharges into waters of the United States. The City would therefore be subject to the NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, Construction General Permit), as amended by Order 2010-0014-DWQ and Order 2012-0006-DWQ). The Construction General Permit regulates discharges of pollutants in stormwater associated with construction activity to waters of the United States from construction sites that disturb one or more acres of land surface, or that are part of a common plan of development or sale that disturbs more than one acre of land surface.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2534 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-29 Utilities and Service Systems The Construction General Permit requires the development and implementation of a SWPPP that includes specific BMPs designed to prevent pollutants from contacting stormwater and keep all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. The SWPPP BMPs are intended to protect surface water quality by preventing the off-site migration of eroded soil and construction-related pollutants from the construction area.

State
California Water Code
surface waters and groundwater is the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1970 (Division 7 of the California Water Code) (Porter-Cologne Act). The Porter-Cologne Act grants the SWRCB and each of the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) power to protect water quality, and is the primary - Cologne Act grants the SWRCB and the RWQCBs authority and responsibility to adopt plans and policies, to regulate discharges to surface and groundwater, to regulate waste disposal sites, and to require cleanup of discharges of hazardous materials and other pollutants. The Porter-Cologne Act also establishes reporting requirements for unintended discharges of any hazardous substance, sewage, or oil or petroleum product.

Each RWQCB must formulate and adopt a Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) for its region. The regional plans are to conform to the policies set forth in the Porter-Cologne Act and established by the SWRCB in its State water policy. The Porter-Cologne Act also provides that a RWQCB may include within its regional plan water discharge prohibitions applicable to particular conditions, areas, or types of waste.

State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board) Storm Water Strategy The Storm Water Strategy is founded on the results of the Storm Water Strategic Initiative, which served developed guiding principles to serve as the foundation of the storm water program; identified issues that support or inhibit the program from aligning with the guiding principles; and proposed and prioritized projects that the Water Boards could implement to address those issues. The State Water Board staff created a strategy-based document called the Strategy to Optimize Management of Storm Water (STORMS). STORMS includes a program vision, missions, goals, objectives, projects, timelines, and consideration o
Program.

Local
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) for the Santa Ana River Basin A Basin Plan is designed to preserve and enhance water quality and protect the beneficial uses of all regional waters. The Basin Plan is a resource for the Regional Board and others who use water and/or discharge wastewater in the region that the Basin Plan is designed to cover. Other agencies and organizations involved in environmental permitting and resource management activities also use the

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2535 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-30 Utilities and Service Systems Basin Plan. Finally, the Basin Plan provides valuable information to the public about local water quality issues.

The Santa Ana Region (Region 8) includes the upper and lower Santa Ana River watersheds, the San Jacinto River watershed, and several other small drainage areas. The Santa Ana Region covers parts of southwestern San Bernardino County, western Riverside County, and northwestern Orange County. The Study Area is located within this region.

Municipal NPDES Permit Waste Discharge Requirements
In response to the Federal Clean Water Act, the Riverside County Watershed Protection program regulates waste dischargers under a NPDES Permit administered by the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. Specifically, the municipalities are regulated with regard to their jurisdiction over and/or maintenance responsibility for municipal storm drain systems and watercourses that they own or operate.

The NPDES Permit is concerned primarily with regulating trash, pollutants of concern, and excessive hydrologic runoff which can carry sediment and cause flooding.

As stated above, pursuant to Section 402 of the CWA and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, municipal stormwater discharge in the City of San Jacinto is subject to the WDRs of the MS4 Permit (Order Number R8-2010-0033) and NPDES Permit No. CAS618033.

The NPDES Permit identifies watershed-wide waste discharge requirements for discharges of storm water runoff associated with new development in the San Jacinto Watershed. It requires developers to complete a SWPPP to address the specific circumstances of each project site. These SWPPPs must: 1) identify all pollutant sources; 2) identify all non-storm water discharges; 3) implement BMPs to reduce or eliminate pollutants in storm water discharges; and 4) develop a maintenance schedule for BMPs installed during construction. The SWPPP must be submitted and approved by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board concurrently with the Notice of Intent to comply with the terms of the Permit prior to construction activities of one acre or more. A storm water diversion plan is needed for strategic recharge Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Master Drainage Plan for San Jacinto Valley Zone 4
The purpose of the Master Drainage Plan report is to identify an integrated network of drainage facilities that will alleviate both known and anticipated drainage problems within the San Jacinto Valley area. The Master Drainage Plan provides an effective and economical approach to providing flood protection and drainage to the area and may be used to guide construction scheduling of the principal drainage facilities.

The Master Drainage Plan will also serve as a guide for locating and sizing local critical drainage facilities necessary to support orderly development within the area.

Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plan
The 2017 Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for the Santa Ana Region (SAR) principal document that translates the MS4 Permit requirements into Permittee programs and implementation plans to manage Urban Runoff. The DAMP was prepared and is periodically updated using a consensus building process that involving public and private sector input and public review through the

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2536 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-31 Utilities and Service Systems CEQA process. The DAMP serves as a model to document the SAR MS4 Permit compliance programs and to provide guidance to the Permittees in the development and implementation of their Local Implementation Plans (LIPs) which contain the enforceable elements of the Permittee compliance programs.

City of San Jacinto 2018 Sewer Master Plan Update
In 2018, the City of San Jacinto updated their Sewer Master Plan to outline the existing resources and conditions of the existing sewer system. The 2018 Update identifies areas for necessary upkeep and provides a detailed overview of the types of facilities available to the City for the use of handling wastewater.

City of San Jacinto Municipal Code
The City of San Jacinto is required to implement procedures with respect to the entry of non-stormwater discharges into its municipal stormwater system. The City of San Jacinto regulates stormwater discharge in accordance with the NPDES permit through Municipal Code Chapter 13.44, Storm Water Management.

SOLID WASTE
Federal
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) was enacted in 1976 to address the huge volumes of municipal and industrial solid waste generated nationwide. After several amendments, the Act as it stands today governs the management of solid and hazardous waste and underground storage tanks (USTs). RCRA, enacted in 1976, is an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965. RCRA has been amended several times, most significantly by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. RCRA is a combination of the first solid waste statutes and all subsequent amendments. RCRA authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate waste management activities. RCRA authorizes states to develop and enforce their own waste management programs, in lieu of the federal program, if a state's waste management program is substantially equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal program.

State
California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939 and SB 1322) The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939 and SB 1322) requires every city and county to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element to its Solid Waste Management Plan that identifies how each jurisdiction will meet the mandatory State waste diversion goals of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent -use solid waste
to the use of a variety of waste management practices to safely and effectively handle the municipal solid waste stream with the least adverse impact on human health and the environment. The Act has established a waste management hierarchy, as follows: Source Reduction; Recycling; Composting; Transformation; and Disposal.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2537 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-32 Utilities and Service Systems California Integrated Waste Management Board Model Ordinance Subsequent to the Integrated Waste Management Act, additional legislation was passed to assist local jurisdictions in accomplishing the goals of AB 939. The California Solid Waste Re-use and Recycling Access Act of 1991 (§42900-42911 of the Public Resources Code) directs the California Integrated Waste recyclable materials in development projects. The model ordinance requires that any new development project, for which an application is submitted on or after September 1, 1994, include family detached homes, recycling areas are required to serve only the needs of the homes within that subdivision.

California Mandatory Commercial Recycling Law (AB 341)
Assembly Bill (AB) 341 directed CalRecycle to develop and adopt regulations for mandatory commercial recycling. CalRecycle initiated formal rulemaking with a 45-day comment period beginning Oct. 28, 2011.

The final regulation was approved by the Office of Administrative Law on May 7, 2012. The purpose of AB 341 is to reduce GHG emissions by diverting commercial solid waste to recycling efforts and to expand the opportunity for additional recycling services and recycling manufacturing facilities in California.

Beginning on July 1, 2012, businesses have been required to recycle, and each jurisdiction has implemented programs that include education, outreach, and monitoring. Jurisdictions were required to start reporting on their 2012 Electronic Annual Report (due August 1, 2013) on their initial education, outreach, and monitoring efforts, and, if applicable, on any enforcement activities or exemptions implemented by the jurisdiction.

In addition to Mandatory Commercial Recycling, AB 341 sets a statewide goal for 75 percent disposal reduction by the year 2020. This is not written as a 75 percent diversion mandate for each jurisdiction.

The 50 percent disposal reduction mandate still stands for cities, counties, and State agencies (including community colleges) under AB 939. CalRecycle continues to evaluate program implementation as it has in the past through the Annual Report review process for entities subject to either AB 939.

Assembly Bill 1826 Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling In October 2014 Governor Brown signed AB 1826, requiring businesses to recycle their organic waste on and after April 1, 2016, depending on the amount of waste they generate per week. This law also requires that on and after January 1, 2016, local jurisdictions across the state implement an organic waste recycling program to divert organic waste generated by businesses, including multifamily residential dwellings that consist of five or more units (please note, however, that multi-family dwellings are not required to have a food waste diversion program). Organic waste (also referred to as organics) means food waste, green waste, landscape and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, and food-soiled paper waste that is mixed in with food waste. This law phases in the mandatory recycling of commercial organics over time, while also offering an exemption process for rural counties. In particular, the minimum threshold of organic waste generation by businesses decreases over time, which means an increasingly greater proportion of the commercial sector will be required to comply.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2538 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-33 Utilities and Service Systems Starting on January 1, 2019, businesses that generate four cubic yards or more of commercial solid waste per week shall arrange for organic waste recycling services. By Summer/Fall 2021, if CalRecycle determines that the statewide disposal of organic waste in 2020 has not been reduced by 50 percent of the level of disposal during 2014, the organic recycling requirements on businesses will expand to cover businesses that generate two cubic yards or more of commercial solid waste per week. Additionally, certain exemptions may no longer be available if this target is not met.

Senate Bill 1383 Short-lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Methane Emissions Reductions In September 2016, Governor Brown signed SB 1383, establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) in various sectors of -Lived Climate Pollutant
Reduction Strategy, established pursuant to SB 605, in order to achieve reductions in the statewide emissions of short-lived climate pollutants. Actions to reduce short-lived climate pollutants are essential to address the many impacts of climate change -risk
communities, and on the environment.

As it pertains to solid waste, SB 1383 establishes targets to achieve a 50 percent reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75 percent reduction by 2025.

The law grants CalRecycle the regulatory authority required to achieve the organic waste disposal reduction targets and establishes an additional target that not less than 20 percent of currently disposed edible food is recovered for human consumption by 2025.

Local
City of San Jacinto Municipal Code
Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Garbage Collection and Disposal, requires mandatory solid waste collection of residential, commercial, and industrial uses. It also establishes recycling of recyclable materials and separation of green waste, which is intended to increase the diversion of recyclable materials from landfills, conserve capacity, extend the useful life of landfills utilized by the City, and help meet State law diversion requirements.

Municipal Code Chapter 8.34, Construction and Demolition Waste Management, requires project applicants for every project covered by the chapter to divert a minimum of 50 percent of the construction and demolition debris resulting from that project, in compliance with State and local statutory goals and policies, and to create a mechanism to secure compliance with the stated diversion requirement to reduce the amount of waste generated within San Jacinto.
4 permit with the State Regional Water Quality Board, full trash capture devices are mandated.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2539 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 34 Utilities and Service Systems

ELECTRICAL POWER, NATURAL GAS, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Federal
Federal Energy Regulation Commission
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission duties include the regulation of the transmission and sale of electricity and natural gas in interstate commerce, licensing of hydroelectric projects, and oversight of related environmental matters.

State
California Public Utilities Commission
Established in 1911, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regulates privately owned electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies.

The commission is organized into several advisory units, an enforcement division, and a strategic planning group. SJP, SCE, and SoCalGas are regulated by the CPUC.

5.19.4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND THRESHOLDS
Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, which includes questions related to utilities and service systems. The issues presented in the Initial Study Environmental Checklist have been utilized as thresholds of significance in this section. Accordingly, a project may create a significant environmental impact if it would:

Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects; Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years;
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments;
Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals; and/or Not comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2540 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 35 Utilities and Service Systems

5.19.5 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
USS 1: Would the Project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Impact Analysis:

WATER
In regard to water facilities, the General Plan Update is expected to result in population and employment growth within the Study Area, and thus, an overall increase in demand on water supply, which would necessitate construction of future water supply infrastructure. Based on the anticipated growth, as described in Section 3.0, Project Description, and summarized in Table 3 4, General Plan 2040 Buildout by Land Use Designation, buildout under the General Plan Update could yield a net change over existing conditions of an additional 16,252 housing units, an additional population of 54,280 people, an additional 21,839,634 square feet of non residential building square footage, and an additional 19,674 jobs within the Study Area.

This increased demand for water infrastructure would primarily be located within areas that are already developed and serviced by the City of San Jacinto Water Department and EMWD. The City has identified future water infrastructure projects including pipeline improvement projects, replacement of the Grand Well, and establishment of a second pressure zone.

Since no specific development projects are proposed as part of the General Plan Update, the environmental effects from constructing or expanding facilities are unknown at this time. All water infrastructure construction activities associated with future development would be subject to compliance with existing local, State, and federal laws, ordinances, and regulations, which would ensure impacts are reduced to less than significant levels. The City would continue to coordinate with EMWD to ensure adequate water distribution facilities are available to serve future development. Furthermore, these future water facilities would be subject to General Plan Update policies and actions intended to protect the environment. Policy RM 2.1 directs the City to cooperate with federal, State, and county governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and quantity of local and regional groundwater resources. Policy RM 2.2 protect aquifers within the Basin and encourages groundwater recharge. Policy RM 2.3 promotes residential, commercial, and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices. Action RM 2e requires, through the development review process, that sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7. Policy RM 9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM 9a directs the City to continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community. This would specifically involve, during the

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2541 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 36 Utilities and Service Systems processing of development proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development. Action RM 9b directs cooperation with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM 9e directs cooperation with the Hemet San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities to a level that is less than significant.

WASTEWATER
In regard to wastewater, the General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population and employment growth within the Study Area, and thus, an overall increase in demand on the existing sewer system associated with increased sewage flows.

As shown in Table 5.19 13, the City’s 2018 Sewer Master Plan estimates that the City’s total wastewater flow by 2040 would be 5.2 MGD, assuming a population of 120,700. Based on the anticipated growth under the General Plan Update, as described in Section 3.0, Project Description, and summarized in Table 3 4, General Plan 2040 Buildout by Land Use Designation, buildout under the General Plan Update would accommodate a population of 107,152. Therefore, using the wastewater generation rate of 43 gpcd, as calculated in the 2018 Sewer Master Plan, the City’s total wastewater flow for 2040 under the General Plan Update would be 4.6 MGD. This is approximately 0.6 MGD less than the 5.2 MGD projected 2040 wastewater flow in the 2018 Sewer Master Plan Update. Therefore, the sewer system under the 2018 Sewer Master Plan accommodates the projected population growth of implementation of the General Plan Update.

The 2018 Sewer Master Plan Update maintains that the total amount of wastewater flow to the EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley RWRF where San Jacinto sewer water is treated and/or disposed of, projected for the year 2040 would be approximately 18.6 MGD. The current capacity for the San Jacinto Valley RWRF is 14 MGD and the maximum capacity for the treatment facility is 27 MGD. The 2018 Sewer Master Plan Update maintains that the City’s sewer service area population is approximately 28 percent of the population within the San Jacinto Valley. Therefore, assuming the City’s wastewater flows as a percentage of the total San Jacinto Valley RWRF remains the same, the total amount of wastewater flow to the EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley RWRF where San Jacinto sewer water is treated and/or disposed of, projected for the year 2040 would be approximately 16.4 MGD. The current capacity for the San Jacinto Valley RWRF is 14 MGD and the maximum capacity for the treatment facility is 27 MGD. Therefore, the ultimate capacity of the facility would be able to meet the project wastewater production from the City of San Jacinto.

The General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; therefore, the environmental effects of future wastewater collection systems are unknown at this time. Future developments would be reviewed by the City, during site plan review in order to determine if sufficient local and trunk sewer capacity exists to serve the specific development, in accordance with SJDC Chapter 17.630, Site Plan and

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2542 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 37 Utilities and Service Systems Design Review. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies, and actions to ensure adequate wastewater services and facilities and that potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of new or expanded infrastructure would be reduced. Policy RM 9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM 9a directs the City to continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.

This would specifically involve, during the processing of development proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development. Action RM 9b directs cooperation with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM 9c directs the City to work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities to a level that is less than significant.

STORMWATER
Develop under the proposed General Plan Update would result in increased areas of impervious surfaces throughout the Study Area, resulting in the need for additional or expanded stormwater drainage, conveyance and retention infrastructure. As described above, RCFCWCD provides flood control services within the Study Area, and is responsible for the regional drainage facilities, while the City controls the local facilities. The infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve new growth would involve development of some facilities on site within new development projects, some facilities off site on appropriately designated land, and may also involve improvements to existing facilities and disturbance of existing rights of way. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded drainage facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the General Plan Update does not propose or approve any specific development project nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded public facilities.

Stormwater drainage and conveyance facilities would be evaluated at the project level in association with subsequent development projects. However, the facilities would be primarily provided on sites with land use designations that allow such uses and the environmental impacts of constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those associated with new development, redevelopment, and infrastructure projects under the General Plan. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. As such, this is a less than significant impact and no additional mitigation is required.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2543 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 38 Utilities and Service Systems The General Plan Update policies and actions would further ensure that there is adequate stormwater drainage and flood control infrastructure to serve future development under the General Plan Update, and would ensure that future drainage and flood control infrastructure projects do not result in adverse environmental impacts. Policy RM 2.5 directs the City to work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy. Action RM 2a requires new development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through implementation of BMPs. It also requires existing development to control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Policy RM 9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM 9f ensures the City refers to the Master Drainage Plan during the annual budget and capital improvement program process to identify the resources needed to designate, preserve, and acquire land for necessary flood control and drainage facilities. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater facilities to a level that is less than significant.

ELECTRICAL, NATURAL GAS, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
In regard to electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication services, the Study Area is within the service areas of SJP and SCE, SoCalGas, and various telecommunication providers. New growth anticipated by the General Plan Update would require increased electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services, potentially resulting in the new construction or relocation of facilities. The environmental effects of future expansions of electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities would be evaluated with each development proposal and would require a separate environmental review related to the construction and operation of new electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure. Future implementing projects under the General Plan Update would have to coordinate with each utility provider to establish service, provide any necessary extensions of facilities, and comply with regulations in existence at that time. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations.

Furthermore, these future facilities would be subject to General Plan Update goals and policies intended to protect the environment. Policy RM 5.4 promotes the use of energy efficient materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure. Policy RM 5.5 promotes energy conservation and recycling by the public and private sectors. Policy RM 5.6 directs the City to collaborate with local service providers in determining and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean, modern, and cost effective ways. Policy RM 9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities to a level that is less than significant.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2544 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 39 Utilities and Service Systems Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU 2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City requirements.

Action LU 2a: Cooperate with LAFCo and the County of Riverside to direct growth outside the City limits on lands that are served, or planned to be served, with a full range of urban services, such as public water and sewer, an extensive road network, public transit, safety and emergency response services, parks, trails, and open space.

Policy LU 3.8: Public Utilities. Ensure land uses and development are compatible with existing and proposed utility facilities including the San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment Facility.

Action LU 3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM 2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water resources.

Policy RM 2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.

Policy RM 2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and encourage groundwater recharge.

Policy RM 2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices.

Policy RM 2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible.

Policy RM 2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Policy RM 2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential negative impacts to groundwater.

Policy RM 2.7: Reclaimed Water. Promote the expanded use of reclaimed water, where feasible.

Action RM 2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2545 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 40 Utilities and Service Systems impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00 65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8 2002 0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).

Action RM 2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream.

Action RM 2c: In cooperation with the state, regional, and local water agencies and suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Specifically, support the expansion of the use of recycled water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Cooperate with these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in development projects.

Action RM 2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water conservation in the following ways:

Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs
Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional water districts
Establishing water conservation education programs
Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.

Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.

Action RM 2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7.

Action RM 2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation areas and quasi active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or drainage detention.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2546 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 41 Utilities and Service Systems Action RM 2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size requirement of one half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection is infeasible.

Action RM 2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as feasible.

Policy RM 5.4: Energy Efficient Materials. Promote the use of energy efficient materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure.

Policy RM 5.5: Energy Conservation. Promote energy conservation and recycling by the public and private sectors.

Policy RM 5.6: Energy Needs. Collaborate with local service providers in determining and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean, modern, and cost effective ways.

Policy RM 9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto.

Policy RM 9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.

Policy RM 9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational amenities, and facilities.

Policy RM 9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas targeted for near term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities through the orderly extension of infrastructure.

Policy RM 9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new development.

Policy RM 9.6: Telecommunications. Encourage service providers to make available the highest level of telecommunications infrastructure, along with a wide range of modern telecommunications services for San Jacinto’s residences, businesses, and institutions.

Action RM 9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community. Specifically, the City should:

During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2547 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 42 Utilities and Service Systems the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development.

Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any new development.

Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in new public and private development and redevelopment projects.

Action RM 9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.

Action RM 9c: Work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.

Action RM 9d: Whenever feasible, require the installation and use of reclaimed water systems for irrigation purposes in new developments.

Action RM 9e: Cooperate with the Hemet San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations.

Action RM 9f: During the annual budget and CIP process, refer to the Master Drainage Plan to identify the resources needed to designate, preserve, and acquire land for necessary flood control and drainage facilities.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS 2: Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Impact Analysis: The General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population and employment growth within the Study Area, and a corresponding increase in the demand for additional water supplies.

As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, and summarized in Table 3 4, General Plan 2040 Buildout by Land Use Designation, buildout under the General Plan could yield a total of 32,081 housing units, a population of 107,152 people, 24,413,227 square feet of non residential building square footage, and 26,989 jobs within the Study Area. This represents development growth over existing conditions of up to 16,252 new housing units, 54,280 people, 21,839,634 square feet of new non residential building square footage, and 19,674 new jobs.

As discussed above, water service is provided in the vast majority of the Study Area by City of San Jacinto Water Department and EMWD, while LHMWD provides water services to only a small portion of the City.

All three service providers have concluded in their respective UWMPs that they would be able to meet projected future water demands under normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. The City’s 2020 UWMP indicates the City can meet water demands during five consecutive year drought periods over the next 20

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2548 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 43 Utilities and Service Systems years; EMWD’s 2020 UWMP indicates that EMWD can meet retail water demands during five consecutive year drought periods over the next 20 years; and LHMWD’s 2020 UWMP indicates that LHMWD can meet water demands during five consecutive year drought periods through 2040.

For future qualifying projects, a Water Supply Assessment would be required pursuant to SB 610 for inclusion in the project’s CEQA analysis. The Water Supply Assessment discerns whether the expected demand from the development being proposed has been accounted for in the forecasted demands in the most recent UWMP. A Written Verification of Supply per SB 221 is prepared as a condition of approval for a subdivision map of 500 units or more. Considered a fail safe mechanism to provide sufficient evidence that adequate water supplies are available before construction begins, the Written Verification of Supply is also prepared/adopted by the water supplier and approved by the land use authority. Depending on the project, one or both of these analyses may be required. Development proposals that may not warrant a Water Supply Assessment and/or Written Verification of Supply, but meet the definition of a project under CEQA, would still require an analysis of sufficient water supplies in the CEQA process. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure that adequate water supply, treatment, and distribution capacity is available to meet the needs of the proposed development without negatively impacting the existing community. Policy RM 2.1 directs the City to cooperate with federal, State, and county governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and quantity of local and regional groundwater resources. Policy RM 2.2 protect aquifers within the Basin and encourages groundwater recharge. Policy RM 2.3 promotes residential, commercial, and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices.

Action RM 2e requires, through the development review process, that sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7. Policy RM 9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM 9a directs the City to continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.

This would specifically involve, during the processing of development proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development. Action RM 9b directs cooperation with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM 9c directs the City to work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary. Action RM 9d requires, whenever feasible, the installation and use of reclaimed water systems for irrigation purposes in new developments. Action RM 9e directs cooperation with the Hemet San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations. Through implementation of existing federal, State, and local regulations and the General Plan

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2549 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 44 Utilities and Service Systems Update goals, policies, and actions, the environmental impacts to water supplies would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU 2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City requirements.

Action LU 2a: Cooperate with LAFCo and the County of Riverside to direct growth outside the City limits on lands that are served, or planned to be served, with a full range of urban services,such as public water and sewer, an extensive road network, public transit, safety and emergency response services, parks, trails, and open space.

Policy LU 3.8: Public Utilities. Ensure land uses and development are compatible with existing and proposed utility facilities including the San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment Facility.

Action LU 3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM 2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water resources.

Policy RM 2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.

Policy RM 2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and encourage groundwater recharge.

Policy RM 2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices.

Policy RM 2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible.

Policy RM 2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Policy RM 2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential negative impacts to groundwater.

Policy RM 2.7: Reclaimed Water. Promote the expanded use of reclaimed water, where feasible.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2550 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 45 Utilities and Service Systems Action RM 2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00 65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8 2002 0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).

Action RM 2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream.

Action RM 2c: In cooperation with the state, regional, and local water agencies and suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Specifically, support the expansion of the use of recycled water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Cooperate with these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in development projects.

Action RM 2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water conservation in the following ways:

Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs
Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional water districts
Establishing water conservation education programs
Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.

Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.

Action RM 2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2551 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 46 Utilities and Service Systems Action RM 2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation areas and quasi active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or drainage detention.

Action RM 2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size requirement of one half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection is infeasible.

Action RM 2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as feasible.

Policy RM 9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto.

Policy RM 9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.

Policy RM 9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational amenities, and facilities.

Policy RM 9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas targeted for near term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities through the orderly extension of infrastructure.

Policy RM 9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new development.

Action RM 9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community. Specifically, the City should:

During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development.

Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any new development.

Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in new public and private development and redevelopment projects.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2552 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 47 Utilities and Service Systems Action RM 9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.

Action RM 9c: Work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.

Action RM 9d: Whenever feasible, require the installation and use of reclaimed water systems for irrigation purposes in new developments.

Action RM 9e: Cooperate with the Hemet San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS 3: Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Impact Analysis: As discussed above, the total amount of projected wastewater flow to EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley RWRF, where San Jacinto sewer water is treated and/or disposed of, for the year 2040 would be approximately 16.4 MGD. The current capacity for the San Jacinto Valley RWRF is 14 MGD and the maximum capacity for the treatment facility is 27 MGD. Therefore, the ultimate capacity of the facility would be able to meet the projected wastewater production from the City of San Jacinto.

As noted above, the General Plan Update enables additional development but does not include specific development proposals. At the time future projects are proposed, they would require a separate environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that time to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate wastewater facilities capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand. Policy LU 2.1 ensures that new development corresponds to the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City requirements. Policy RM 9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM 9a directs the City to continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community. This would specifically involve, during the processing of development proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development. Action RM 9b directs cooperation with the water districts to update population projections,

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2553 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 48 Utilities and Service Systems water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM 9c directs the City to work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary. The implementation of existing federal, State, and local regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity and impacts would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

Policy LU 2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City requirements.

Action LU 2a: Cooperate with LAFCo and the County of Riverside to direct growth outside the City limits on lands that are served, or planned to be served, with a full range of urban services, such as public water and sewer, an extensive road network, public transit, safety and emergency response services, parks, trails, and open space.

Policy LU 3.8: Public Utilities. Ensure land uses and development are compatible with existing and proposed utility facilities including the San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment Facility.

Action LU 3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM 9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto.

Policy RM 9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.

Policy RM 9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational amenities, and facilities.

Policy RM 9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas targeted for near term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities through the orderly extension of infrastructure.

Policy RM 9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new development.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2554 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 49 Utilities and Service Systems Action RM 9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community. Specifically, the City should:

During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development.

Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any new development.

Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in new public and private development and redevelopment projects.

Action RM 9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.

Action RM 9c: Work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS 4: Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Impact Analysis: Future development of projects as contemplated under the General Plan Update may increase the population within the Study Area by an additional 54,280 people. As described above, the City of San Jacinto has achieved a disposal rate of 3.8 PPD per resident in 2019. Assuming these disposal rates remain constant throughout the life of the General Plan Update, the new growth under General Plan buildout would result in a net increase of approximately 206,264 PPD of solid waste over existing conditions, which equals 103.1 net TPD or 37,631.5 net tons of solid waste per year.

The City’s projected increase in solid waste generation associated with 2040 buildout under the General Plan Update is within the permitted capacity of both the Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill and El Sobrante Landfill. As noted previously, the vast majority (95 percent) of solid waste disposed from the City of San Jacinto in 2019 went to two waste disposal facilities: Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill (69 percent) and El Sobrante Landfill (26 percent) (CalRecycle 2021). Other landfills that received relatively small amounts of waste from the City in 2019 include:

Azusa Land Reclamation Co. Landfill (15 tons);
Badlands Sanitary Landfill (1,117 tons);

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2555 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 50 Utilities and Service Systems McKittrick Waste Treatment Site (7 tons);
San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill (1 ton); and
Sycamore Landfill (352 tons).

Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 8.7 million tons as of 2020, is permitted a maximum throughput of 5,000 TPD, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2029 with the potential for expansion. El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 8.7 million tons as of 2019, is permitted a maximum throughput of 16,054 TPD, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2051, beyond the 20 year planning horizon of the General Plan Update. Conservatively assuming the Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill reaches full capacity during the 20 year planning horizon of the General Plan Update, the El Sobrante Landfill would have adequate capacity to accommodate the City’s projected solid waste generation under buildout of 203.6 TPD. Further, it is more likely that future solid waste would be distributed to the other landfills serving the City.

In addition, all future development would be required to comply with the mandatory commercial and multifamily recycling requirements of AB 341, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste. Furthermore, the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions that would reduce the demand for solid waste disposal. Policy RM 10.1 ensures compliance with local, regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting. Policy RM 10.2 provides adequate waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities. Policy RM 10.4 ensures participation in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region. Policy RM 10.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas. Policy RM 10.7 promotes citywide educational programs to inform citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations. Action RM 10a ensures solid waste collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.

Action RM 10b includes standard language in requests for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates. Action RM 10c encourages the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including: increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling programs; increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and reduced yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques.

Through the implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions, this is a less than significant impact.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2556 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 51 Utilities and Service Systems Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM 10.1:Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.

Policy RM 10.2:Solid Waste Collection. Provide adequate waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities.

Policy RM 10.4:Source Reduction and Recycling Efforts. Participate in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region
Policy RM 10.5:Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas.

Policy RM 10.6:Fees and Funding. Work with appropriate service providers to periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve state and federal mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for service delivery.

Policy RM 10.7:Public Education. Promote citywide educational programs to inform citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.

Action RM 10a:On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.

Action RM 10b:Include standard language in requests for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.

Action RM 10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including the following:

Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics;
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2557 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 52 Utilities and Service Systems Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e waste) drop off services and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e waste.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS 5: Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Impact Analysis: As discussed in the settings section, Chapter 8.32 of the Municipal Code establishes mandatory solid waste and recycling collection to comply with the requirements of AB 939 and AB 341.

The City has also established disposal and mandatory recycling requirements for commercial facilities, single family residential and multifamily residential premises to comply with State law diversion requirements. As permitted by AB 939, the City authorizes a private solid waste franchisee (i.e., CR&R) to handle the City’s solid waste and requires CR&R to cooperate in the preparation of solid waste disposal characterization studies and the preparation of waste stream audits. CR&R and the City work together to submit information to meet the reporting requirements of AB 939, or any other law or regulation, to reach the solid waste and recycling goals mandated by the AB 939.

The General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions would reduce the demand for solid waste disposal.

Policy RM 10.1 ensures compliance with local, regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting. Policy RM 10.2 provides adequate waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities. Policy RM 10.4 ensures participation in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region. Policy RM 10.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas. Policy RM 10.7 promotes citywide educational programs to inform citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations. Action RM 10a ensures solid waste collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan. Action RM 10b includes standard language in requests for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates. Action RM 10c encourages the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including: increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling programs; increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and reduced yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques.

Through the implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions, future development implemented by the General Plan Update would continue to comply with

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2558 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 53 Utilities and Service Systems management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste and impacts would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM 10.1:Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.

Policy RM 10.2:Solid Waste Collection. Provide adequate waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities.

Policy RM 10.4:Source Reduction and Recycling Efforts. Participate in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region
Policy RM 10.5:Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas.

Policy RM 10.6:Fees and Funding. Work with appropriate service providers to periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve state and federal mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for service delivery.

Policy RM 10.7:Public Education. Promote citywide educational programs to inform citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.

Action RM 10a:On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.

Action RM 10b:Include standard language in requests for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.

Action RM 10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including the following:

Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics;

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2559 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 54 Utilities and Service Systems Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e waste) drop off services and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e waste.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

5.19.6 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Impact Analysis: Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for water, wastewater, stormwater, solid waste, electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services within the Study Area.

WATER
Cumulative water impacts are analyzed in terms of impacts to San Jacinto, EMWD and LHMWD water supplies and facilities. Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for water services within the City of San Jacinto Water District, EMWD, and/or LHMWD service area. It is required that every urban water supplier assess the reliability to provide water service to its customers under normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. As indicated above, all three water service providers in the Study Area have concluded in their respective UWMPs that they would be able to meet projected future water demands under normal, dry, and multiple dry water years.

Future development projects accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update would be evaluated by the City on a project by project basis to determine potential impacts to water supplies and infrastructure. The continued assessment of individual projects for impacts to the water supply system would assure projects would only be approved if adequate water supplies exist at the time of their implementation. All future development would be subject to all applicable federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations in place for water supply and infrastructure. Further, new development would be required to pay all applicable connection fees and ongoing user fees related to the provision of water services. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in cumulatively considerable water supply and infrastructure impacts.

WASTEWATER
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for wastewater services within the sewer service area. As discussed above, the total amount of projected wastewater flow to EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley RWRF, where San Jacinto sewer water is treated and/or disposed of, for the year 2040 would be approximately 16.4 MGD. The current capacity for the San Jacinto Valley RWRF is 14 MGD and the maximum capacity for the treatment facility is 27 MGD. Therefore, the ultimate capacity of the facility would be able to meet the projected wastewater production from the City of San Jacinto. The General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; individual development projects would be required to verify that existing capacity exists to convey and treat the

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2560 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 55 Utilities and Service Systems potential wastewater generated with the new development. At the time future wastewater facilities are proposed, they would require a separate environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that time would address potential environmental impacts related to the construction and operation of new wastewater facilities. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate wastewater services and facilities. Therefore, cumulative impacts to wastewater services and facilities would be less than significant.

STORMWATER
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for stormwater services within the Study Area. As discussed above, the General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; therefore, the environmental effects of future storm water drainage facilities are unknown at this time. At the time future stormwater facilities are proposed, they would require a separate environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that time would address potential environmental impacts related to the construction and operation of new stormwater facilities. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate stormwater service and facilities. Therefore, cumulative impacts to stormwater services and facilities would be less than significant.

SOLID WASTE
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for solid waste collection and disposal services. San Jacinto, along with cities and County lands in the surrounding area, would continue to use common landfill resources, thereby gradually reducing the capacity of local landfills.

As noted above, the General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; however, the increase in solid waste generation due to future individual and cumulative development projects together could significantly impact solid waste resources. Individual development projects and related cumulative projects would be required to meet current recycling goals, reducing the amount of solid waste requiring disposal at landfills. Future developments would be reviewed on a project by project basis and solid waste impacts would be evaluated based on existing and planned disposal facilities and capacities available at that time.

In addition, all future development would be required to comply with the mandatory commercial and multifamily recycling requirements of AB 341, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste. Furthermore, the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions would reduce the demand for solid waste disposal.

Therefore, the contribution of the General Plan Update to cumulative impacts associated with increased solid waste would be less than significant.

ELECTRIC POWER, NATURAL GAS, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services within the Study Area. As noted above, the General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; individual development projects would be required to verify that electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications usage generated

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2561 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19 56 Utilities and Service Systems with the new development would not create significant environmental impacts. Therefore, the contribution of the General Plan Update to cumulative impacts associated with increased electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No Mitigation Required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

5.19.7 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
Impacts to utilities and service systems associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. No significant unavoidable impacts to utilities and service systems would occur as a result of the General Plan Update.

5.19.8 REFERENCES
CalRecycle, Jurisdiction Disposal by Facility: Disposal during 2019 for San Jacinto, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility, accessed September 10, 2021.

CalRecycle, SWIS Facility/Site Summary: El Sobrante Landfill (33 AA 0217), https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/Site/Summary/2402, accessed September 10, 2021.

CalRecycle, SWIS Facility/Site Summary: Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill (33 AA 0007), https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/Site/Summary/2368, accessed September 10, 2021.

CalRecycle, Jurisdiction Disposal Tonnage Trend, Jurisdiction: San Jacinto https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/AnnualReporting/ReviewReports, accessed September 10, 2021.

Stetson Engineers, Inc., City of San Jacinto 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, May 2021.

City of San Jacinto, 2018 Sewer Master Plan Update, February 2019.

City of San Jacinto, 2018 Water System Master Plan Update, March 2018.

CR&R Environmental Services, City of San Jacinto, https://crrwasteservices.com/cities/california/county of riverside/city of san jacinto/, accessed September 14, 2021.

Department of Water Resources, California’s Groundwater: Bulletin 118 – Update 2003, October 2003.

HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc., Purified Water Replenishment Project (SCH No. 2020049002) Draft Environmental Impact Report, February 2021.

Highspeedinternet.com, Internet Providers in San Jacinto, CA, https://www.highspeedinternet.com/ca/san jacinto?zip=92583, accessed September 17, 2021.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2562 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-57 Utilities and Service Systems Lake Hemet Municipal Water District, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, December 2021.

Lake Hemet Municipal Water District, Jason Venable, Customer Service Supervisor, email communication, September 13, 2021.

Riverside County, Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plan Santa Ana Region, June 2017.

Riverside County Department of Waste Resources, Kinika Hesterly, Urban/Regional Planner IV, email communication, December 30, 2020.

San Jacinto Power, FAQ, http://sanjacintopower.com/about/f_a_q, accessed September 17, 2021.

Southern California Edison, Who We Are, https://www.sce.com/about-us/who-we-are, accessed September 14, 2021.

Southern California Gas Company, Company Profile, https://www.socalgas.com/about-us/companyprofile, accessed September 14, 2021.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Introduction to the Clean Water Act, https://cfpub.epa.gov/watertrain/pdf/modules/introtocwa.pdf, accessed September 13, 2021.

Water Systems Consulting, Inc., Eastern Municipal Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, July 2021.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2563 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.19-58 Utilities and Service Systems This page intentionally left blank.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2564 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Document Path: Y:\ProjectData\DeNovo\Riverside\SanJacinto\Task_20_GP_EIR\mxd\SJC_Fig5-19-1_WaterServiceArea_211012.mxd

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2565 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2566 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Document Path: Y:\ProjectData\DeNovo\Riverside\SanJacinto\Task_20_GP_EIR\mxd\SJC_Fig5-19-2_SewerLinesAndServiceArea_211012.mxd

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2567 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2568 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-1 Wildfire

5.20 WILDFIRE
This section analyzes potentially significant impacts related to wildfire that could result from implementation of the General Plan Update. Potential impacts are identified and mitigation measures to address potentially significant impacts are recommended, as necessary. The discussion of fire suppression resources is located in Section 5.15, Public Services, of this EIR.

5.20.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

WILDFIRE HAZARDS
Threat from wildfire hazards is determined based on a number of factors, including fuel loading (vegetation); topography; climatic conditions, such as wind, humidity, and temperature; and the proximity of structures and urban development to fire hazards. Wildland fire hazards are most pronounced in Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) areas and areas of development that are located within Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs). WUI areas typically contain higher amounts of vegetation that can serve as fuel for fires. Generally, the periods of greatest risk for wildland fire are the late summer and early fall when vegetation is at its driest. Human activity, including residential and agricultural burning, campfires, and the use of fireworks can all trigger fires. Natural causes such as lightning strikes may also start fires.

The State has charged the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) with the identification of FHSZ within State Responsibility Areas (SRA). In addition, CAL FIRE must recommend Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) identified within any Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). The FHSZ maps are used by the State Fire Marshall as a basis for the adoption of applicable building code standards and are meant to help limit wildfire damage to structures through planning, prevention, and the application of risk reduction measures
(e.g., flammable vegetation), slope, and fire weather. There are three zones, based on increasing fire hazard: moderate, high, and very high. Figure 5.20-1, Fire Hazard Severity Zones, shows FHSZ in the Study Area.

Local Responsibility Areas
Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) are concentrated on the interior edges of the City boundaries. The open space area on the western boundary of the City (up against Lakeview Mountains) is designated as a VHFHSZ. In addition, a mountainous undeveloped area in the southeast portion of the City, known as Park Hill, is also identified as a VHFHSZ under local responsibility, as well as the eastern edge along San Jacinto River.

State Responsibility Areas
SRAs are typically areas outside of City limits, but within Spheres of Influence. There are pockets of FHSZs within SRAs to the east and west of the City. However, the only SRA within the Study Area is on the eastern portion of the Sphere of Influence; a majority of this SRA is designated as a VHFHSZ, with a very small pocket of moderate to high fire hazard threat along the San Jacinto River.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2569 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-2 Wildfire
CAL FIRE has also been charged with producing mapping datasets that depict fire threat potential throughout California. CAL FIRE ranks fire threat based on the availability of fuel and the likelihood of an area burning (based on topography, fire history, and climate). These two factors are combined to create a five-point scale of fire threats ranging from Low to Extreme. The fire threat for the Study Area is shown in Figure 5.20-2, Fire Threat Areas. The majority of the Study Area is unranked because it consists of urban development that has no wildfire potential. However, areas designated as having Very High risk are located within, and adjacent to, the western and eastern portions of the Study Area. These areas also possess lands that have been designated as a VHFHSZ. The area known as Park Hill within the Study Area has also been identified as having fire risk ranging from Low to High with the majority of this area also categorized as being within a VHFHSZ.

IDENTIFYING FIRE HAZARDS
Fuel rank is a ranking system developed by CAL FIRE that incorporates four wildfire factors: fuel model, slope, ladder index, and crown index.

The U.S. Forest Service has developed a series of fuel models, which categorize fuels based on burn characteristics. These fuel models help predict fire behavior. In addition to fuel characteristics, slope is an important contributor to fire hazard levels. A surface ranking system has been developed by CAL FIRE, which incorporates the applicable fuel models and slope data. The model categorizes slope into six ranges:
0-10 percent, 11-25 percent, 26-40 percent, 41-55 percent, 56-75 percent and >75 percent. The combined fuel model and slope data are organized into three categories, referred to as surface rank. Thus, surface rank is a reflection of the quantity and burn characteristics of the fuels and the topography in a given area.

The ladder index is a reflection of the distance from the ground to the lowest leafy vegetation for tree and plant species. The crown index is a reflection of the quantity of leafy vegetation present within individual specimens of a given species.

The surface rank, ladder index, and crown index for a given area are combined in order to establish a fuel rank of medium, high, or very high. Fuel rank is used by CAL FIRE to identify areas in the California Fire Plan where large, catastrophic fires are most likely.

The fuel rank data is used by CAL FIRE to delineate fire threat based on a system of ordinal ranking. Thus, the Fire Threat model creates discrete regions, which reflect fire probability and predicted fire behavior.

The four classes of fire threat range from moderate to extreme.

HISTORY OF WILDFIRE
The City of San Jacinto does not have its own Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), but adopted Resolution 3738 on September 18, 2018 approving the City of San Jacinto Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex from the Riverside County Operational Area Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), therefore allowing the City to utilize the County LHMP. The County LHMP documented that there were 88 wildland fires of 300 acres and larger within Riverside County between 2001 and July of 2017. CAL FIRE also records all known fires that occur annually and compiles them into the CAL FIRE Incident Database. The Incident report archives date back to 2013, but some of the larger fires have been recorded since the early 2000s (earliest accessible case is the Schaeffer Fire of 2002). The larger (1,000 acres+) fires that have occurred

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2570 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-3 Wildfire
within an approximately 40-mile radius in and around the Study Area region within the last five years are shown in Table 5.20-1, History of Fire in San Jacinto and Surrounding Area. Table 5.20-1 History of Fire in San Jacinto and Surrounding Area
Year Fire Name, Location, & Description Acres
Burned Containment
2016
Bogart Fire; off Winesap Avenue and International Park Road, north of Beaumont, near Cherry Valley, Riverside County. Active for three days. One structure destroyed and one person injured.
1,470 100%
2017 Palmer Fire; San Timoteo Canyon Road / Fisherman's Retreat, Beaumont, Riverside County. Active for 128 days. 3,874 100%
2017 Blaine Fire; Blaine Road and Terrace Drive, Riverside County. Active for 148 days. 1,044 100%
2017 Manzanita Fire; Hwy 79 North, Lambs Canyon south of Dump Road, south of Beaumont, Riverside County. Active for 196 days. 6,309 100% 2017 Opera Fire; off Opera Loop and East Palmyrita Avenue, in Highgrove, Riverside County. Active for 253 days. 1,350 100%
2018 Cranston Fire; off Highway 74 and Control Road, east of Hemet, Riverside County. Active for 162 days. 12 structures destroyed. 13,139 100% 2018 Patterson Fire; off Rawson Road and Royal Netherlands Road, south of Winchester, Riverside County. Active for 231 days. 1,261 100% 2019 Sandalwood Fire; Calimesa Boulevard and Sandalwood Drive, Riverside County. 16 structures damaged, 74 structures destroyed and two fatalities. 1,011 100% 2019 Tenaja Fire; Tenaja Road and Clinton Keith Road, in La Cresta, Riverside County. Active for 10 days. Two structures damaged and three people injured. 1,926 100% 2020 Sanderson Fire; La Borde Canyon Rd and Jack Rabbit Trail, Riverside County.

Active for one day. 1,933 100%
2021 Chaparral Fire; Cleveland Forest Road and Tenaja Road southwest of Murrieta in Riverside and San Diego Counties. Active for three days 1,427 100% Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Incidents, https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/IncidentSearch?q=san+jacinto, accessed September 24, 2021

WILDFIRE PREPAREDNESS & PROGRAMS
Due to climate, vegetation, and topography, the Study Area is subject to both wildland and urban fires. As discussed above, the Study Area, contains VHFHSZs within SRAs and LRAs. Details of fire protection services are provided in Section 5.15, Public Services, of this EIR.

Since 1996, the City of San Jacinto has contracted with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) for fire and emergency services. The RCFD contracts with CAL FIRE for provision of services as part of an integrated fire protection system. Services to the City are provided by two RCFD fire stations: Station 25, located at 132 South San Jacinto Avenue on the east side of the City, and Station 78, located at 2450 West Cottonwood Avenue on the west side of the City. The RCFD has two operational support divisions that aid in wildfire incidents: the Conservation Camps and the Hemet Ryan Air Attack Base. The RCFD Conservation

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2571 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-4 Wildfire
Hemet Ryan Air Attack Base provides support for wildland fires and other rescue operations.

The RCFD Strategic Plan 2009- 2029 outlines goals and strategies for fire protection services throughout the Riverside County Operational Area, including facility needs and improvements, training requirements, and disaster preparedness. Disaster preparedness efforts include oversight of the Office of Emergency Services (OES), including maintaining the OES in a continued state of readiness, training staff and outside agency representatives in their roles and responsibilities, and coordinating Emergency Operations Center (EOC) operations when activated in response to an emergency or major event/incident. (RSG) CAL FIRE State program. This program is a preparedness campaign that gives Riverside County residents tips on how to be prepared for wildfires year-round. It is an easy-to-understand guide for how to make a home resistant to wildfires as well as preparing families to leave early and safely. T
Program and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the U.S. Fire Administration.

5.20.2 REGULATORY SETTING

FEDERAL
FY 2001 Appropriations Act
and Agriculture.

Disaster Mitigation Act
The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires that a state mitigation plan, as a condition of disaster assistance, add incentives for increased coordination and integration of mitigation activities at the state level through the
National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy
Under the direction of the Federal Land Assistance, Management, and Enhancement Act of 2009 (the FLAME Act), the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture created the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy report. This report contains a cohesive wildfire management strategy as directed by the FLAME Act and under the advisement of the intergovernmental Wildland Fire Leadership Council. The most recent version of this report is The National Strategy: The Final Phase in the Development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy (2014).

National Fire Plan (NFP) 2000
The summer of 2000 marked a historic milestone in wildland fire records for the United States. Dry conditions (across the western United States), led to destructive wildfire events on an estimated 7.2 million acres, nearly double the 10-year average. Costs in damages, including fire suppression activities, were approximately 2.1 billion dollars. Congressional direction called for substantial new appropriations

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2572 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-5 Wildfire
for wildland fire management. This resulted in action plans, interagency strategies, and the Western the Environment - A 10-Year Comprehensive Strategy - Implement known as the National Fire Plan. This plan places a priority on collaborative work within communities to reduce their risk from large-scale wildfires.

Healthy Forest Initiative (HFI) 2002/Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) 2003 In August 2002, the Healthy Forests Initiative (HFI) was launched with the intent to reduce the severe wildfires risks that threaten people, communities, and the environment. Congress then passed the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) on December 3, 2003 to provide the additional administrative tools needed to implement the HFI. The HFRA strengthened efforts to restore healthy forest conditions near communities by authorizing measures such as expedited environmental assessments for hazardous fuels projects on federal land. This Act emphasized the need for federal agencies to work collaboratively with communities in developing hazardous fuel reduction projects and places priority on fuel treatments identified by communities themselves in their Community Wildfire Protection Plans.

Department of the Interior Department Manual Part 620
Wildland Fire Management Part 620 of the Department of the Interior Departmental Manual pertains to wildland fire management policies, with the goal of providing an integrated approach to wildland fire management. The guiding principles of the plan emphasize the need for public health and safety considerations, risk management protocols, inter-agency collaboration, and economic feasibility of wildfire management practices, as well as the ecological role of wildfires.

STATE
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Under Title 14 of the Natural Resources of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), CAL FIRE has the primary responsibility for implementing wildfire planning and protection for SRA lands. CAL FIRE develops fire safe regulations and issues fire safe clearances for land within the SRA. The CAL FIRE Resource y-owned wildlands, and
Under CCR Title 24, Regulations Development, the Office of the State Fire Marshal is responsible for promulgating regulations that promote fire and life safety for inclusion into the State Building Codes, including the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, and California Historical Building Code. The process incorporates a great deal of public participation and is guided by the State Building Standards Law.

Strategic Fire Plan for California
The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, along with CAL FIRE, updated the previous 2010 Strategic Fire Plan to reflect current and anticipated needs by incorporating and updating goals and objectives to reflect new priorities and changed conditions. The 2018 Strategic Fire Plan focuses on 1) fire prevention and suppression activities to protect lives, property, and ecosystem services, and 2) natural resource

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2573 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-6 Wildfire
and to serve as important habitat for adaptation and mitigation. It serves as guidance for CAL FIRE and stakeholders who share similar missions and responsibilities towards public safety and fire suppression.

California Wildland- Urban Interface Code
On September 20, 2005, the California Building Standards Commission approved the Office of the State Fi
Regulations [CCR] Title 24, Part 2). Section 701A of the CBC includes regulations addressing materials and construction methods for exterior wildfire exposure and applies to new buildings located in state responsibility areas or VHFHSZs in LRAs.

California Fire Code
The 2019 California Fire Code (CCR Title 24, Part 9) establishes regulations to safeguard against the hazards of fire, explosion, or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures, and premises.

The Fire Code also establishes requirements intended to provide safety for and assistance to firefighters and emergency responders during emergency operations. The provisions of the Fire Code apply to the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal, and demolition of every building or structure throughout California. The Fire Code includes regulations regarding fire-resistance-rated construction, fire protection systems such as alarm and sprinkler systems, fire services features such as fire apparatus access roads, means of egress, fire safety during construction and demolition, and wildland-urban interface areas.

California State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
The purpose of the State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (SHMP) is to significantly reduce deaths, injuries, and other losses attributed to natural- and human-caused hazards in California. The SHMP provides guidance for hazard mitigation activities emphasizing partnerships among local, state, and federal agencies as well as the private sector.

California Government Code
California Government Code Section 65302.5 requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to General Plan is amended. While not a direct and binding fire prevention requirement for individuals, recommendations will include goals and policies that provide for contemporary fire prevention standards for the jurisdiction.

California Government Code Section 51175 defines Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones and designates lands considered by the State to be a very high fire hazard.

California Government Code Section 51182 specifically requires people who own, lease, control, operate, or maintain a building or structure on or adjoining land within a VHRHSZ, to do all of the following: (A) Maintain defensible space of 100 feet from each side and from the front and rear of the structure, (B) Remove that portion of a tree that extends within 10 feet of the outlet of a chimney or stovepipe, (C) Maintain a tree, shrub, or other plant adjacent to or overhanging a building free of dead or dying wood, (D) Maintain the roof of a structure free of leaves, needles, or other vegetative materials, and (E) Prior to constructing a new dwelling or structure that will be occupied or rebuilding an occupied dwelling or

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2574 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-7 Wildfire
occupied structure damaged by a fire in that zone, the construction or rebuilding of which requires a building permit, the owner shall obtain a certification from the local building official that the dwelling or structure, as proposed to be built, complies with all applicable state and local building standards.

California Government Code Section 51189 directs the Office of the State Fire Marshal to create building standards for wildland fire resistance. The code includes measures that increase the likelihood of a structure withstanding intrusion by fire (such as building design and construction requirements that use fire-resistant building materials) and provides protection of structure projections (such as porches, decks, balconies and eaves), and structure openings (such as attics, eave vents, and windows).

California Public Resources Code
Section 4290, which include the
establishment of SRAs.

Public Resources Code Section 4291 sets forth defensible space requirements, which are applicable to anyone that owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains a building or structure in, upon, or adjoining a mountainous area, forest-covered lands, brush covered lands, grass-covered lands, or land that is covered with flammable material (Section 4291(a)).

Public Resources Code Sections 4292-4296 and 14 CCR 1256: Fire Prevention for Electrical Utilities address the vegetation clearance standards for electrical utilities. They include the standards for clearing around energy lines and conductors such as power-line hardware and power poles. These regulations are critical to wildland fire safety because of the substantial number of power lines in wildlands, the historic source of fire ignitions associated with power lines, and the extensive damage that results from power line caused wildfires in severe wind conditions.

Assembly Bill 337
Per AB 337, local fire prevention authorities and CAL FIRE are required to identify VHFHSZs in LRAs.

Standards related to brush clearance and the use of fire-resistant materials in fire hazard severity zones are also established.

California Code of Regulations Title 8
In accordance with CCR Title 8, Sections 1270 and 6773 (Fire Prevention and Fire Protection and Fire Equipment), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal OSHA) establishes fire suppression service standards. The standards range from fire hose size requirements to the design of emergency access roads.

California Code of Regulations Title 14 (Natural Resources) Division 1.5 (Department of Forestry and Fire Protection), Title 14 of the CCR establishes a variety of wildfire preparedness, prevention, and response regulations.

California Code of Regulations Title 19 (Public Safety) Title 19 of the CCR establishes a variety of emergency fire response, fire prevention, and construction and construction materials standards.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2575 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-8 Wildfire
California Code of Regulations Title 24 (California Building Code) The CBC contains general building design and construction requirements relating to fire and life safety, structural safety, and access compliance. CBC provisions provide minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures and certain equipment.

California Health and Safety Code and Uniform Building Code Section 13000 et seq. State fire regulations are set forth in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Health and Safety Code, which the enforcement of the UBC and mandate the abatement of fire hazards.

The code establishes broadly applicable regulations, such as standards for buildings and fire protection devices, in addition to regulations for specific land uses, such as childcare facilities and high-rise structures.

California Senate Bill 1241
California Senate Bill 1241 requires that the Safety Element component of city or county general plans to incorporate fire risk related to SRAs and VHFSZ.

LOCAL
Riverside County Ordinance 659
Riverside County Ordinance No. 659 requires the payment of mitigation fees to provide sufficient fire service for new development.

County of Riverside Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan The purpose of the LHMP
estimate the probability of future occurrences and set goals to mitigate potential risks to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from natural and man-made hazards.

The plan identifies vulnerabilities, provides recommendations for prioritized mitigation actions, evaluates resources and identifies mitigation shortcomings, provides future mitigation planning, and maintenance of existing plans.

The City of San Jacinto does not have its own LHMP, but has adopted Resolution 3738 on September 18, 2018 approving the City of San Jacinto Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex from the Riverside County LHMP as required by the Federal Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 2000.

Riverside County Fire Department Strategic Plan 2009-2029 The RCFD Strategic Plan (Plan) was created to ensure all residents throughout the county were provided adequate safety and emergency services. The Plan contains six goals that focus on ensuring proper services and operations are able to be provided uninterrupted. The Plan includes an Implementation

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2576 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-9 Wildfire
Action Plan, which serves as a mechanism to monitor progress and identify challenges or necessary changes to the strategic plan.

City of San Jacinto Emergency Operations Plan 2021
The City of San Jacinto adopted its Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) in May 2021. The EOP addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents. The plan focuses on coordinating mutual aid and provides an overview of the operational concepts relating to various emergency situations, identifies components of the emergency response, and describes the overall responsibilities of the Riverside County Operational Area for supporting Operational Area Members in protecting life and property.

San Jacinto Municipal Code
Title 8, Health and Safety pertains to fire codes (Chapter 8.16, Fire Code) and emergency medical services (Chapter 8.18, Emergency Medical Services Response). The 2019 California Fire Code sets forth requirements including those for building materials and methods pertaining to fire safety and life safety, fire protection systems in buildings, emergency access to buildings, and handling and storage of hazardous materials. In December 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance 19-19 approving the 2019 Fire Code Updates as modified by the Riverside County Fire Department.

Chapter 12.16, Underground Utility District, defines the process for which utility infrastructure can be erected or removed in the City.

Chapter 15.28, Hillside Development regulates development of hillside areas by relating the number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings to the topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through extensive cut and fill. These regulations are also designed to minimize danger to life and property due to the hazards of fire, flood, soil erosion, seepage and destruction of natural topography and plant material.

San Jacinto Development Code (SJDC) Section 17.300.050, Fire Hazards discusses structural and wildland fire hazards. With regards to structural fire hazards, the use, handling, storage, and transportation of combustibles and explosives shall comply with the California Fire Code and CCR, Title 19 (Public Safety).

Pertaining to wildland fire hazards, a fire management plan shall be prepared for all development located in or adjacent to wildfire prone areas (i.e., naturally vegetated hillsides). The fire management plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief, who may require fire protection measures (e.g., landscape or open space buffers), maintenance programs for weed and vegetation abatement, installation of fire-resistant plants, and the use of noncombustible building materials, including roofing.

5.20.3 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND THRESHOLDS
Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, which includes questions related to wildfire. The issues presented in the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, which have been utilized as thresholds of significance in this section.

Accordingly, a project may create a significant environmental impact if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, and if it would:

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2577 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-10 Wildfire
Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire;
Require the installation of maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment; and/or Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes.

5.20.4 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
WF-1: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Impact Analysis: The Study Area contains both SRAs and LRAs that are classified as VHFHSZs (with SRAs also containing moderate to high FHSZs), as depicted in Figure 5.20-1. The General Plan Update would allow a variety of new development, including residential, commercial, industrial, and public service uses, which would result in increased jobs and population in the Study Area. Road and infrastructure improvements would occur to accommodate the new growth as further discussed in Section 5.17, Transportation, of this Draft EIR. Implementation of the General Plan Update would not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. As described in Section 5.15, Public Services, the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) provides fire and emergency response service to the City of San Jacinto. The RCFD Strategic Plan 2009-2029 outlines goals and strategies for fire protection services throughout the Riverside County Operational Area, including addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents, including wildfires. The EOP focuses on coordinating mutual aid and provides an overview of the operational concepts relating to various emergency situations, identifies components of the emergency response, and describes the overall responsibilities of the Riverside County Operational Area for supporting Operational Area Members in protecting life and property. The EOP does not provide a specific evacuation route map, as evacuation measures would be implemented based on the specific emergency and area affected. The General Plan Update would not require or result in revisions to the RCFD Strategic Plan or adopted EOP.

The General Plan Update does not include any site-specific development. However, future development would be designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with applicable standards, including vehicular access to ensure that adequate emergency access and evacuation would be maintained.

Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, Fire Code, construction activities that may temporarily restrict fire apparatus access would be required to implement appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of fire apparatus and emergency vehicles through/around any effected roadways, as part of the building

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2578 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-11 Wildfire
permit process. The General Plan Update identifies major arterials as the primary routes for evacuation; however, evacuation routes would depend upon the emergency event and area affected.

As part of the General Plan Update, the City prepared an analysis consistent with Senate Bill 99 to identify residential developments in hazard areas that do not have at least two emergency evacuation routes. The analysis found that out of 4,990 unique land parcels identified as residential and located within an identified hazard zone, the vast majority (approximately 77 percent) of the parcels have multiple exit points with access to multiple arterials, and another 13 percent of the parcels have multiple exit points with access to a single arterial, a loop road. Approximately 10 percent of the developed parcels have one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial. Parcels with one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial are widespread throughout the Study Area, and tend to be condominium, apartment, and mobile home communities, or large rural residential parcels. There are no parcels in the Study Area one exit point with some distance to a single arterial
The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address emergency evacuation routes.

Specifically, Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios. Action PS-2a implements the EOP to ensure the most effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency, and update it as needed. Policy PS-5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City. In addition, Policy PS-5.2 supports the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations. Action RM-6c implements an Emergency Operation Center to respond to and manage disasters in cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and local, state, and federal emergency management agencies. It would also provide annual training for City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.

Primary access to all major roads would be maintained during construction of future developments within the Study Area. As part of the site plan and design review process (SJDC Chapter 17.630), future development projects would be reviewed for adequate infrastructure and access as well as consistency with adopted emergency and evacuation plans among many other environmental issues in order to ensure the safety of City residents and the physical environment. Therefore, the General Plan Update would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and impacts would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety: A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire emergencies.

Policy PS-2.2: Fire Protection Services. Reduce the risk of fire to the community by coordinating emergency preparedness with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD).

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2579 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-12 Wildfire
Policy PS-2.3: Fire Hazard Identification
Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (Figure PS-2) for changes in fire hazard severity zones consistent with changes in hazard designations by CAL FIRE.

Policy PS-2.7: Interagency Support. Participate in the mutual aid system and automatic aid agreements to back up and supplement capabilities to respond to emergencies Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones. c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment. d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire. e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained. g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance. h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures, improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.

Policy PS-2.12: Hazard Mitigation Plans. Coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies to update emergency, evacuation, and hazard mitigation plans, as necessary.

Policy PS-2.13: Essential Public Facilities and Infrastructure. Locate, when feasible, new essential public facilities and infrastructure outside of very high fire hazard severity zones, including but not limited to, hospitals and health care facilities, emergency shelters, emergency command centers, emergency communication facilities, and utilities or identify construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these facilities must be located in very high fire hazard severity zones.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2580 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-13 Wildfire
Action PS-2a: Implement the
of resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency, and update it as needed
Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage, and disruption of vital services.

Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City.

Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials, schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources, facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.

Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.

Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address ongoing hazardspecific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from disasters.

Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs and practices regarding emergency preparedness.

Action PS-5b: perations Plan and update it
regularly.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2581 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-14 Wildfire
Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures.

Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.

Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.

Goal PS-7: Climate Change and Resiliency Planning: A resilient, sustainable, and equitable community where risks to life, property, the economy, and the environment resulting from climate change, including extreme weather events, are minimized Policy PS-7.1: Community Preparedness. Promote a well-prepared City that can effectively overcome natural disasters and scarcity of resources due to climate change.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-6: Public Safety Resources. A community that safeguards persons and property through the provision of high-quality public safety services and crime prevention measures.

Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to the San Jacinto community.

Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

WF-2: Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Impact Analysis: The Study Area contains both SRAs and LRAs that are classified as VHFHSZs (with SRAs also containing moderate to high FHSZs), as depicted in Figure 5.20-1. As depicted in Figure 5.20-2, the Study Area also contains areas that are considered between low to extreme fire threats to people. The

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2582 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-15 Wildfire
General Plan Update land uses located within these SRA VHFHSZs are largely designated Open Space, which would preclude new development. Some portions of the Study Area within a FHSZ are currently designated Specific Plan and rural, low- and medium density residential. However, the General Plan Update does not propose changes to the types of land uses that could occur within these areas when compared to the existing General Plan. There are areas in the northwestern portion of the City, outside of, but in proximity to FHSZs, that would allow for medium density residential development under the proposed General Plan Update. Future development of medium density residential uses would introduce additional structures and people in proximity to open space areas identified as a VHFHSZ. However, as shown on Figure 5.20-2, these areas are not identified as having a fire threat.

Implementation of the General Plan Update would not substantially alter the slope, prevailing winds, or other factors that would increase exposure to San Jacinto residents, employees or visitors to increased pollutant concentrations from wildfire or result in the uncontrollable spread of a wildfire. Depending upon the specific site and associated geographical conditions, future development within a FHSZ could exacerbate wildfire risks. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address wildfire hazards. For example, Policy RM-1.5 of the Resource Management Element, and Policy LU-3.7 of the Land Use Element regulate hillside development. Policy PS-2.1 protects communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones. Any future projects contemplated under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with the provisions of federal, State, and local requirements related to wildland fire hazards, including State fire safety regulations associated with wildland-urban interfaces, fire-safe building standards, and defensible space requirements as part of approval process. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for potential impacts, specific to that project, associated with wildland fire hazards as required under CEQA. Potential development within or near FHSZs, would be required to comply with design and development standards set forth by the SJDC and Municipal Code, including SJDC Chapter 17.300.050, which addresses development of hillsides and requires preparation of fire management plans. Therefore, with implementation of the applicable General Plan goals, policies, implementation plans, and compliance to development and fire codes, impacts are considered less than significant in this regard.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU 3.7: Hillside Development. Conserve hillsides by limiting development on slopes greater than 25 percent and allowing unique planning techniques such as Specific Plans, Planned Unit Developments, and clustered development to reduce grading

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire emergencies.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2583 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-16 Wildfire
Policy PS-2.4: Urban Fire Risks. Work with RCFD to maintain an ongoing fire inspection program to reduce fire hazards associated with multifamily development, critical facilities, public assembly facilities, industrial buildings, and nonresidential buildings.

Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones. c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment. d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire. e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained. g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance. h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures, improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.

Policy PS-2.11: Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard severity zones as part of the development review process.
a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires. b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles). c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices in accordance with the Development Code.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2584 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-17 Wildfire
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.

Action PS-2b: Mitigate, as feasible, existing non-conforming development to contemporary fire safe standards where feasible, including road standards and vegetative hazards.

Action PS-2c: Require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City, including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas through Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside Development Standards to retain the si
borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.

Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.

Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.

Policy RM-4.10:GHG Reduction. Consider and adopt new local policies and programs that will help to provide energy efficient alternatives to fossil fuel use and reduce consumption in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the local measures identified in the Western Riverside County Subregional Climate Action Plan for San Jacinto.

Action RM-4b: As applicable, review new industrial and commercial development projects during the CEQA process for potential air quality impacts to residences and other sensitive receptors.

Ensure that mitigation measures and best management practices are implemented to reduce significant emissions of criteria pollutants.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

WF-3: Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Impact Analysis: Future development anticipated by the General Plan Update would require the construction and installation of infrastructure, including roads water and sewer and power lines to serve increased growth and development. The General Plan Update land uses located within these SRA VHFHSZs are largely designated Open Space, which would preclude new development. The General Plan Update does not propose changes to the types of land uses that could occur within areas identified as FHSZ when

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2585 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-18 Wildfire
compared to the existing General Plan. Development of infrastructure to serve new development would primarily occur outside of areas identified as FHSZs. The General Plan Update includes requirements for adequate water supply and water flow availability, emergency access, fire protection services, fire safe design site standards, and ensuring public awareness regarding fire safety. Policy PS-2.1 protects communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones. Policy PS-5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Policy RM9.2 maintains and finances the capital improvement program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.

Policy RM-9.3 ensures that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure, services, and facilities. Policy RM-9.5 ensures collaboration with the various regional facility and service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new development.

All future development projects would be required to be standards related to development in high fire hazard areas.

Future development of utility infrastructure would be subject to the requirements established in Public Resources Code Section 4292, which requires clearing of flammable fuels for a minimum 10-foot radius from the outer circumference of poles and towers; and Section 4293, which sets basic requirements for clearances around electrical conductors. Furthermore, future development would be required to meet vegetation clearance requirements outlined in Title 14, Section 1104.1(d) of the California Code of Regulations for single overhead facilities.

Maintenance of existing infrastructure and the potential installation of new infrastructure for future projects in the Study Area would be required to comply with Fire Code requirements found in the Municipal Code and SJDC for new development projects. Proposed development would be reviewed by the RCFD to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with the Fire Code.

The potential for future projects to impact environmental resources to meet compliance with fire development standards such (as fuel breaks and clearance requirements) would require site specific environmental evaluation under CEQA to identify any site-specific impacts. In addition, any development in the City would need to comply with the California Building Code, Public Resource Code, and the City Municipal Code to ensure that new developments have access to necessary utilities, and any additional utility construction complies with all code requirements. Municipal Code Chapter 12.16, Underground utility district, defines the process for which utility infrastructure can be erected or removed in the City.

Further, Chapter 15.32, Utility installations, establishes the requirement of complying with the California Public Utilities Commission Rules and Regulations. As demonstrated throughout this EIR, implementation of the various policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update would reduce potential impacts associated with the construction and expansion of infrastructure. Implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions, combined with local and State requirements, as discussed previously, would

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2586 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-19 Wildfire
ensure that potential wildland fire hazards would not be exacerbated by local infrastructure, and this impact would be reduced to a less than significant level.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire emergencies.

Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones. c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment. d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire. e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained. g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance. h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures, improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.

Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage, and disruption of vital services.

Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2587 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-20 Wildfire
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials, schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources, facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.

Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.

Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address ongoing hazardspecific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from disasters.

Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs and practices regarding emergency preparedness.

Action PS-5b:
regularly.

Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures.

Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.

Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2588 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-21 Wildfire

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.

Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto.

Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

WF-4: Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Impact Analysis: Wildfire can alter the hydrologic response of a watershed to the extent that even modest rainstorms can produce dangerous flash floods and debris flows (U.S. Geological Survey 2021). A number of factors affect the likelihood of downstream flooding or landslide after a fire including basin morphometry, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics (U.S. Geological Survey 2021).

The General Plan Update would allow development and improvement projects that would involve some land clearing, grading, and other ground-disturbing activities that could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction. All future developments located in or adjacent to wildfire prone areas (i.e., naturally vegetated hillsides) would be required to prepare a fire management plan pursuant to SJDC Section 17.300.050. The fire management plan is subject to the review and approval of the RCFD. The RCFD may require fire protection measures (e.g., landscape or open space buffers), maintenance programs for weed and vegetation abatement, installation of fire-resistant plants, and the use of noncombustible building materials, including roofing. Areas with slopes correspond with the areas identified as having greater landslide risk presented in Figure 5.7-5 in Section 5.7, Geology and Soils, and correspond with areas that are designated as FHSZs. Within the Study Area, these include Park Hill, the western edge of the Study Area along Lakeview Mountains, and the eastern portion of the Sphere of Influence along the San Jacinto Mountains.

Chapter 15.28 of the Municipal Code regulates development of hillside areas by relating the number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings to the topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through extensive cut and fill. These regulations are also designed to minimize danger to life and property due to the hazards of fire, flood, soil erosion, seepage and destruction of natural topography and plant material. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. With adherence to the Municipal and

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2589 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-22 Wildfire
Development Codes, future development on sloped terrain prone to flooding, landslides, and instability will not have adverse effects on the environment.

As detailed throughout Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, future development resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update could increase the potential for flooding in a number of ways:
new development and redevelopment could increase storm water velocity leading to off-site flooding; new development and redevelopment could impede or redirect flood flows; and the placement of new or redevelopment projects could create or contribute to runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. However, as discussed in Section 5.10, all future development and redevelopment projects would be required to comply with applicable federal, State, regional, and local plans, policies, and regulations to address site-specific drainage and potential flooding risks.

Specifically, future site-specific development would be required to comply with Municipal Code Chapter

15.40, Floodplain Management, which provides land use and development regulations to all land within flood prone, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion areas, including City review of development permits to ensure adherence to federal, State, and local flood-related regulations as well as additional standards applicable to all areas of special flood hazards in the City. Future development projects would be reviewed by the City to determine if a project site is located within areas of special flood hazards and thus subject to additional provisions set forth in Chapter 15.40. Additionally, construction of storm drainage improvements would occur as part of an overall development or infrastructure project, and would be considered in the environmental review associated with the specific project being proposed (see Section 5.10 for additional details).

Furthermore, the General Plan Update goals,
policies, and actions would limit exposure between people and structures with wildfire risks. Policy PS1.5 requires the assessment and mitigation of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards. Goal RM-2, Water Resources is intended to hinder potential threats related to flooding, runoff, and drainage. Through compliance with local, State, and federal regulations, and compliance with General Plan Update goals and policies, potential exposure of people or structures to significant risks resulting from runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards. A community that is adequately prepared for natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.

Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards.

Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards pursuant to

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2590 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-23 Wildfire
the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all identified significant public safety hazards.

Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire emergencies.

Policy PS-2.11 Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard severity zones as part of the development review process.
a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires. b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles). c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices in accordance with the Development Code.
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.

Goal PS-3: Flood Hazards. A community that is protected from flood hazards.

Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce stormwater runoff.

Policy PS-3.8: Development in the Flood Plain and Flood Way. Protect the community from flooding hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting development within the flood plain and flood way as necessary to protect public health and safety.

Policy PS-3.10: Changing Conditions. Coordinate with the RCDCD to consider the need to expand the capacity of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions associated with climate change and extreme weather.

Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.

Policy PS-3.12: Adequate Infrastructure. Maintain and regularly assess the status of local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.

Action PS-3i: Continue to implement the Flood Plain Management program, which establishes rules and regulations for flood plain management. Continue to apply the rules and regulations to development in areas of special flood hazards as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and as illustrated on the most recent Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2591 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-24 Wildfire

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural resources.

Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas through compliance wit
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources.

Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside Development Standards borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.

Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the survey.

Action RM-1g: Where feasible, incorporate open space and passive recreational uses into areas identified to have significant hazards related to flooding, geologic conditions, and seismic events.

Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water resources.

Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible.

Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently strategy.

Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2592 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-25 Wildfire
(RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region Order No. 00- -2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS
618033).

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

5.20.5 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Impact Analysis: The City of San Jacinto currently has programs and regulations in place, and works in accordance with regional services to provide adequate emergency response to wildfire threats. The General Plan Update and public information regarding
designated emergency facilities and routes are regularly reviewed to ensure that up to date information is available to the City and the public in the event of an emergency. Important new and expanded critical facilities would also be located in a way to ensure resiliency and functionality in the event of a natural disaster. Implementation of the General Plan Update would have a less than significant impact with regard to this issue.

No specific aspect as a result of implementation of the General Plan Update will substantially alter the slope, prevailing winds, or other factors that would increase exposure to San Jacinto residents, employees or visitors to increased pollutant concentrations from wildfire or result in the uncontrollable spread of a wildfire. General Plan Update implementation would not exacerbate wildfire risks in VHFHSZs; therefore, these impacts would be less than significant.

Furthermore, the General Plan Update is a long-range policy document that does not include site-specific designs or plans, and does not propose any entitlements for specific developments. However, future development may require extension and development of infrastructure such as roads, water and sewer utilities, and fuel breaks into areas designated as FHSZs. The potential for future projects to impact environmental resources are mitigated through compliance with fire development standards (such as fuel breaks and clearance requirements) and would require site-specific environmental analysis as required under CEQA. As demonstrated throughout this EIR, implementation of the various policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update would reduce potential impacts associated with the construction and expansion of infrastructure. Implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions combined with local and State requirements, as detailed previously, would ensure that potential wildland fire hazards would not be exacerbated by new local infrastructure, and this impact would be considered less than significant.

While the General Plan Update cannot state with certainty that future risks associated with post-fire flooding and debris flow would not occur in the Study Area, implementation of the General Plan Update would not exacerbate this risk. Implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as compliance with the Ci would reduce this risk to the greatest extent feasible, resulting in an impact that is less than significant as a result of adoption and implementation of the proposed

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2593 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 5.20-26 Wildfire
General Plan Update. Implementation of the goals and policies provided would ensure that the proposed General Plan incremental contribution to cumulative wildfire impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

5.20.6 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
Wildfire impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant; no significant unavoidable wildfire impacts would occur as a result of the General Plan Update.

5.20.7 REFERENCES
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), 2019 Wildfire Activity Statistics.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), California Office of the State Fire Marshal, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps, https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/wildfire-planningengineering/wildland-hazards-building-codes/fire-hazard-severity-zones-maps/, accessed September 28, 2021.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Incident Database, https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/IncidentSearch?q=san+jacinto, accessed September 28, 2021.

City of San Jacinto, Riverside County Fire,
https://www.sanjacintoca.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=10384430&pageId=13809073, accessed September 28, 2021.

City of San Jacinto, Resolution No. 3738, September 2018.

Riverside County Fire Department, Operational Support Functions, http://www.rvcfire.org/stationsAndFunctions/OpsSppt/Pages/default.aspx, accessed September 28, 2021.

United States Geologic Survey (USGS), Emergency Assessment of Post-Fire Debris-Flow Hazards, 2021 https://landslides.usgs.gov/hazards/postfire_debrisflow/, accessed October 6, 2021.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2594 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) tS ybri K
evA
t S et atS ml aP
t Stti weH
ev AnoyL
evA nots waC
s onaBs ol oni maC
evAll edO
evA nosr ednaS
dR nerr a W
evA lmaP
t S ai b m
t S ybri K
t S et atS evAnoyL evA nosr ednaS

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2595 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2596 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) tS ybri K
evA
t S et atS ml aP
t Stti weH
ev AnoyL
evA nots waC
s onaBs ol oni maC
evAll edO
evA nosr ednaS
dR nerr a W
evA lmaP
t S ai b m
t S ybri K
t S et atS evAnoyL evA nosr ednaS

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2597 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2598 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 6.0-1 Other CEQA Considerations

6.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

6.1 LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2, this section analyzes short-term uses of the environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity. If the Project is approved, implementation of the General Plan Update would involve a variety of short- and long-term impacts on a local level. For example, surrounding uses may be temporarily impacted by dust and noise during future construction activities. However, these disruptions would be temporary and may be avoided or lessened to a large degree through policies and actions cited in this EIR and through compliance with the San Jacinto Municipal Code and other relevant regulations; refer to Section 5.0, Environmental Analysis. Implementation of the General Plan Update would potentially create long-term environmental consequences associated with potential future development. Development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update and the subsequent long-term effects may impact the physical, aesthetic, and human environments. Long-term physical consequences of development include increased traffic volumes, increased noise from Project-related mobile (traffic) and stationary (truck ignition and idling, etc.) sources, hydrology and water quality impacts, and increased energy and natural resource consumption. Incremental degradation of local and regional air quality would also occur because of mobile source emissions generated from increased traffic, and stationary source emissions generated from the consumption of natural gas and energy.

6.2 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
According to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(c) and 15126.2(c), an EIR is required to address any significant irreversible environmental changes that would occur should the proposed project be implemented. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(c):
irreversible since a large commitment of such resources makes removal or nonuse thereafter unlikely. Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts (such as highway improvement which provides access to a previously inaccessible area) generally commit future generations to similar uses. Also irreversible damage can result from environmental accidents associated with the project. Irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current Determining whether the proposed project would result in significant irreversible effects requires a determination of whether key resources would be degraded or destroyed such that there would be little possibility of restoring them. Irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified.

CONSUMPTION OF NONRENEWABLE RESOURCES
The environmental impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update are analyzed in Section 5.0. Future development would consume limited, slowly renewable and non-renewable

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2599 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 6.0-2 Other CEQA Considerations resources. This consumption would occur during each in
continue throughout its operational lifetime. Future development would require a commitment of resources that would include: (1) building materials; (2) fuel and operational materials/resources; and (3) the transportation of goods and persons to and from individual development sites. Construction would require the consumption of resources that are not renewable or which may renew so slowly as to be considered non-renewable. These resources would include the following construction supplies: lumber and other forest products; aggregate materials used in concrete and asphalt; metals; and water. Fossil fuels such as gasoline and oil would also be consumed to power construction vehicles and equipment.

Development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update would consume resources which would be similar to those currently consumed within the City (i.e., energy resources such as electricity and natural gas, petroleum-based fuels required for vehicle-trips, fossil fuels, and water).

Fossil fuels would represent the primary energy source associated with both construction and ongoing operation, and the existing, finite supplies of these natural resources would be incrementally reduced.

Future development operations would occur in accordance with California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6, which sets forth conservation practices that would limit energy consumption. Nonetheless, the proposed P energy requirements would represent a long-term commitment of essentially nonrenewable resources.

Construction activities associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could release hazardous materials into the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions; refer to Section 5.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. All potential demolition, grading, and excavation activities would be subject to the established regulatory framework to ensure that hazardous materials are not released into the environment. Compliance with the established regulatory framework and mitigation measures would protect against a significant and irreversible environmental change resulting from the accidental release of hazardous materials.

In addition, there is the potential that individual future development projects would use and store limited amounts of potentially hazardous materials typical; refer to Section 5.9. All future development activities requiring the routine use, storage, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials would be subject to all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations and standards in place for hazardous materials.

Compliance with these regulations and standards would protect against significant and irreversible environmental changes due to the accidental release of hazardous materials.

In conclusion, future construction and operations would result in the irretrievable commitment of limited, slowly renewable, and nonrenewable resources, which would limit the availability of these resource quantities for future generations or for other uses during the life of the individual developments. It is noted that the continued use of such resources would be on a relatively small scale in a regional context.

IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS/IRREVERSIBLE PHYSICAL CHANGES Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future. Land use and development consistent with the General Plan Update would result in irretrievable commitments by introducing development onto sites that are presently undeveloped. The conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses would result in an irretrievable loss of agricultural land,

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2600 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 6.0-3 Other CEQA Considerations wildlife habitat, and open space. Additionally, development would physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emission, noise, traffic, open space, and natural resources. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs. Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in changes in land use within the Study Area that would commit future generations to these uses.

In summary, the General Plan Update includes an extensive policy framework that is designed to address land use and environmental issues to the greatest extent feasible, while allowing growth and economic prosperity for the City. However, even with the policies and actions that would serve to reduce potential significant impacts, future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant irreversible changes. This impact is considered a significant and unavoidable impact under CEQA.

6.3 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
Section 15126.2(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR evaluate the growth-inducing impacts of a proposed action. A growth-inducing impact is defined by the CEQA Guidelines as:

The way in which a proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment.

It is not
assumed that growth in an area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment.

Based on the CEQA Guidelines, growth inducement is any growth that exceeds planned growth of an area and results in new development that would not have taken place without implementation of the project.

A project can have direct and/or indirect growth inducement potential. Direct growth inducement would result if a project, for example, involved construction of new housing. A project would have indirect growth inducement potential if it established substantial new permanent employment opportunities (e.g., commercial, industrial, or governmental enterprises) or if it would involve a construction effort with substantial short-term employment opportunities that would indirectly stimulate the need for additional housing and services to support the new employment demand (Napa Citizens for Honest Government v.

Napa County Board of Supervisors). Similarly, a project would indirectly induce growth if it would remove an obstacle to additional growth and development, such as removing a constraint on a required public service. A project providing an increased water supply in an area where water service historically limited growth could be considered growth-inducing.

The CEQA Guidelines further explain that the environmental effects of induced growth are considered indirect impacts of the proposed action. These indirect impacts or secondary effects of growth may result in significant, adverse environmental impacts. Potential secondary effects of growth include increased demand on other community and public services and infrastructure, increased traffic and noise, and adverse environmental impacts such as degradation of air and water quality, degradation or loss of plant and animal habitat, and conversion of agricultural and open space land to developed uses.

Growth inducement may constitute an adverse impact if the growth is not consistent with or accommodated by the land use plans and growth management plans and policies for the area affected.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2601 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 6.0-4 Other CEQA Considerations Local land use plans provide for land use development patterns and growth policies that allow for the orderly expansion of urban development supported by adequate urban public services, such as water supply, roadway infrastructure, sewer service, and solid waste service.

The General Plan is a long-term plan intended to accommodate projected population, housing, and employment growth, including the appropriate balance among these factors with the necessary public services and infrastructure. The proposed General Plan Update would serve as a comprehensive, longterm plan for the physical development of San Jacinto. Projected growth is described in Section 5.14, Population and Housing, and the environmental consequences related to the potential growth are fully assessed in each topical section. By definition, the proposed General Plan Update is intended to provide for and address future growth in the City.

Because the proposed General Plan Update provides a framework for development through its Land Use Map, land use designations, goals, policies, and actions, it would directly induce population and employment growth in the San Jacinto Study Area by designating land for development that is more intense, in some instances, than current designations allow. The analysis of the indirect growth-inducing impacts for the proposed General Plan Update focuses on the following factors: inducement of unanticipated population growth; encouragement of economic growth that leads to jobs and housing growth; elimination of obstacles to population growth; and resulting service, facility, or infrastructure demands in excess of existing and planned growth.

The General Plan Update accommodates future growth in San Jacinto, including new businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and new residential uses. Infrastructure and services would need to accommodate future growth. The General Plan Update is oriented toward the economic growth of the City, with emphasis given to encouraging development of a broader array of businesses, increasing local employment opportunities, and providing residential development as necessary to serve economic growth. The cumulative development scenario addressed in this Draft EIR assumes a 20-year planning horizon (the level of development that could reasonably be expected by the year 2040), while the year 2060 is assumed to be the full buildout year of the General Plan (the point at which all parcels in the City are developed according to their General Plan land use designation). The 20-year planning horizon (2040) represents approximately 50 percent of total buildout; this expected pace of growth is based on historical development patterns in and around San Jacinto and development trends projected for Western Riverside County.

As shown in Table 3-5, General Plan Update Growth Assumptions, buildout of the General Plan Update through 2040 could yield up to 16,252 new housing units and 21,839,634 square feet of new nonresidential building square footage within the Study Area.

Given the historical and current population, housing, and employment trends, growth in the City, as well as the entire State, is inevitable. The primary factors that account for population growth are natural increase and net migration. Other factors that affect growth include the cost of housing, the location of jobs, the economy, the climate, and transportation. The Inland Empire region, including Riverside County, has been one of the fastest-growing regions in Southern California over the past two decades. This growth has been driven in part by the relative affordability and availability of land in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, making it an attractive place to build new housing. While these factors would likely result in

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2602 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 6.0-5 Other CEQA Considerations growth in San Jacinto during the planning period of the proposed General Plan Update, growth would continue to occur based primarily on the demand of the housing market and demand for new commercial, industrial, and other non-residential uses. As future development occurs under the proposed General Plan Update, new roads, infrastructure, and services would be necessary to serve the development, and this infrastructure would accommodate planned growth. However, growth under the General Plan Update would remain within the general growth levels projected Statewide and would not be anticipated to exceed any applicable growth projections or limitations that have been adopted to avoid an environmental effect. The General Plan Update is intended to accom Statewide housing needs, based on regional numbers provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development on a regular basis (every five to eight years).

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions that mitigate environmental impacts associated with growth, such as air quality, noise, traffic, water supply, and water quality. Additionally, this Draft EIR identifies General Plan policies and actions, where appropriate, that would serve to reduce or eliminate potentially significant impacts associated with specific environmental issues associated with growth.

Sections 5.1 through 5.20 and 6.0 provide a discussion of environmental effects associated with development allowed under the General Plan Update.

With implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed under the General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds. Therefore, population and housing growth associated with the General Plan Update would result a less than significant impact.

6.4 SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(b) requires an EIR to discuss unavoidable significant environmental effects, including those that can be mitigated but not reduced to a level of insignificance. The following significant and unavoidable impacts of the General Plan Update are discussed in Section 5. Refer to those discussions for further details and analysis of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified below:

Agricultural Resources
General Plan implementation would result in the conversion of farmlands, including Prime Farmland and Unique Farmland to non-agricultural use.

Cumulative impact to agricultural lands and resources.

Air Quality
General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

General Plan implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2603 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 6.0-6 Other CEQA Considerations Biological Resources
General Plan implementation could have a substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special status species.

General Plan implementation could have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
General Plan implementation would generate greenhouse gas emissions that would not satisfy the Greenhouse Gas reduction targets established by federal and State law and may have a significant effect on the environment.

Cumulative Greenhouse Gas emissions impact.

Noise
General Plan implementation would result in substantial permanent increases in existing noise levels at sensitive receptors.

Cumulative considerable impact relative to traffic noise.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2604 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-1 Alternatives

7.0 ALTERNATIVES

7.1 INTRODUCTION
Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines requires the identification and evaluation of a range of reasonable alternatives designed to feasibly achieve the most basic objectives of the project, while avoiding or substantially lessening any of the significant environmental effects of the project. In addition, CEQA requires a comparative evaluation of the merits of the alternatives.

Pursuant to Section 15126.6(f)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives include, but are not limited to, site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plan or regulator limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and whether the proponent can reasonably acquire, control or otherwise have access to the alternative site (or the site is already owned by the proponent). Although these factors do not present a strict limit on the scope of reasonable alternatives to be considered, they help establish the context in sufficient to establish and foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making.

7.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN THIS EIR

FACTORS GUIDING SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES
A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was circulated to the public and a public scoping meeting was held during the public review period to solicit recommendations for a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project. No specific alternatives were recommended by commenting agencies or the general public during the NOP public review and comment period.

An EIR must only discuss in detail an alternative that is capable of feasibly attaining most of the basic objectives associated with an action, while at the same time avoiding or substantially lessening any of the significant effects associated with the proposed project. As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the following objectives have been identified for the proposed Project:

1. Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;

2. and character;

3. Promote San Jacinto as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community;

4. Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner;

5. Encourage the revitalization of San Jacinto and other community activity centers;

6. Allow for a range of housing options;

7. Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents;

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2605 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-2 Alternatives

8. Create a more balanced jobs-housing ratio within the community;

9. Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities;

10. Maintain strong fiscal sustainability and continue to provide efficient and adequate public services;

11. Address new requirements of State law; and

12. Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
The General Plan Update would result in the following significant and unavoidable impacts, which are described in Sections 5.1 through 5.20:

Agricultural Resources
General Plan implementation would result in the conversion of farmlands, including Prime Farmland and Unique Farmland to non-agricultural use.

Cumulative impact to agricultural lands and resources.

Air Quality
General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

General Plan implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Cumulative impact on
Biological Resources
General Plan implementation could have a substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special status species.

General Plan implementation could have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
General Plan implementation would generate greenhouse gas emissions that would not satisfy the Greenhouse Gas reduction targets established by federal and State law and may have a significant effect on the environment.

Cumulative Greenhouse Gas emissions impact.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2606 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-3 Alternatives
Noise
General Plan implementation would result in substantial permanent increases in existing noise levels at sensitive receptors.

Cumulative considerable impact relative to traffic noise.

Implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, policies and actions can reduce all other potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. This section considers alternatives that could otherwise avoid or minimize these significant and unavoidable impacts. A description of each alternative and a comparative environmental evaluation of the impacts identified for the General Plan Update is provided below.
where the No Project Alternative is
identified as environmentally superior, the EIR is then required to identify as environmentally superior an the proposed Project and determined to be environmentally superior, inferior, or neutral. However, as stated above, only those impacts found to be significant and unavoidable for the proposed Project are used in making the final determination of whether an alternative is environmentally superior or inferior to the proposed Project.

ALTERNATIVES TO THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Three alternatives to the General Plan Update were considered based on the analysis performed to identify the environmental effects of the proposed Project. Project alternatives focus on amending land uses to potentially address impacts. The alternatives analyzed in this EIR include the following:

Alternative 1: No Project Alternative.

As required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e), under Alternative 1, the City would not adopt the General Plan Update. The existing San Jacinto General Plan would continue to be implemented and no changes to the General Plan, including the Land Use Map, Circulation Diagram, goals, policies, or actions would occur. This Alternative assumes that ultimate development of the 2006 General Plan would occur and the 2006 General Plan would continue to provide outdated information regarding several issues, including projections and policy direction that were identified in the 2000s that are not reflective of the existing socioeconomic data and anticipated development patterns. Subsequent projects, such as amending the Municipal Code (including the zoning map), would not occur. The existing General Plan Land Use Map is shown on Figure 3.3 in Section 3.0, Project Description. Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative Alternative 2 continues to provide for residential and nonresidential development in single-use and mixed-use formats throughout the City, but at residential densities and nonresidential intensities lower than those reflected in the proposed General Plan Update. This Alternative is defined by three major changes from the proposed General Plan Update:

1. Reduction in the maximum density and intensity associated with the Mixed-Use (MU) land use designation; in Alternative 2, the maximum density for residential development in areas

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2607 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-4 Alternatives
designated for MU is reduced from 36 du/ac to 22 du/ac (consistent with the maximum density proposed for the High Density Residential land use designation) and the maximum intensity for nonresidential development is reduced from 1.0 FAR to 0.50 FAR (consistent with the maximum intensity proposed for the Commercial land use designation).

2. Elimination of the Downtown Village (DV) land use designation; in Alternative 2, areas previously designated for DV are designated for High Density Residential (HDR).

3. Elimination of the Very High Density Residential (VHDR) land use designation; in Alternative 2, areas previously designated for VHDR are designated for High Density Residential (HDR).

This alternative continues to allow for mixed-use opportunities with less development potential, and in more limited areas, than allowed under the General Plan Update. It also reflects a maximum residential density of 22 du/ac, consistent with the maximum residential density allowed under the current General Plan. This alternative was developed to potentially reduce the severity of significant and unavoidable impacts related to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise.

Figure 7-1, Alternative 2 Land Use Map, depicts the Land Use Map proposed for Alternative 2.

Alternative 3: Employment Focused Alternative
Alternative 3 would revise the General Plan Land Use Map to place more emphasis on accommodating nonresidential development in non-mixed-use formats to create a more equal balance of housing and employment opportunities. This Alternative is defined by two major changes from the Proposed General Plan:

1. Refinement of the Mixed-Use (MU) land use designation to allow for a mix of only nonresidential uses (residential uses are prohibited); in Alternative 3, the land use definition for MU is updated allow for a mix of commercial, industrial, and business park uses and to preclude residential development (both as a stand-alone use or as part of a mixed-use project).

2. Elimination of the Downtown Village (DV) land use designation; in Alternative 3, areas previously designated for DV are designated for commercial uses.

This alternative emphasizes commercial development and business expansion in an effort to achieve a jobs-housing balance closer to 1.0. This alternative was developed to potentially reduce the severity of significant and unavoidable impacts related to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and noise.

Figure 7-2, Alternative 3 Land Use Map depicts the Land Use Map proposed for Alternative 3.

7.3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
A summary of the growth projections, including population growth, housing units, jobs, and the resultant job/housing balance for the project and each alternative is shown in Table 7-1, Growth Projections by Alternative. The alternatives analysis provides a summary of the relative impact level of significance associated with each alternative for each of the environmental issue areas analyzed in this EIR. Following the analysis of each alternative, Table 7-5 summarizes the comparative effects of each alternative with the proposed Project.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2608 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-5 Alternatives
Table 7-1
Growth Projections by Alternative*
Alternative Dwelling
Units Population
Nonresidential
Square Feet of
Development
Jobs Jobs per
Housing Unit
Existing Conditions
Study Area 15,830 52,872 2,575,358 7,312 0.46
New Growth
Proposed General Plan 16,251 54,280 21,834,559 19,674 - Alternative 1: Existing General Plan/No Project 6,462 21,583 15,393,830 13,108 - Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative 11,912 39,787 21,046,035 16,630 - Alternative 3: Employment Focused Alternative 3,602 12,030 17,746,595 13,327 - Buildout Growth: Existing plus New Growth Proposed General Plan 32,081 107,152 24,409,917 26,986 0.84 Alternative 1: Existing
General Plan/No Project 22,292 74,455 17,969,188 20,420 0.92 Alternative 2: Reduced
Growth Alternative 27,742 92,659 23,621,393 23,942 0.86 Alternative 3: Employment
Focused Alternative 19,432 64,902 20,321,953 20,639 1.06 Notes:
*Assumes 2040 buildout of the proposed General Plan Update The primary difference between the proposed General Plan and Alternatives 2 and 3 are the Land Use Maps associated with each of these alternatives. Most of the goals, policies, and actions contained in the proposed General Plan Update would also apply and be implemented under Alternatives 2 and 3. The only goals, policies, and actions that would not be implemented under Alternatives 2 and 3 are ones that specifically address proposed land uses that would not be included under Alternatives 2 and 3. For example, the Downtown Village land use would not be included under Alternatives 2 and 3, so Land Use Element Goal LU-4, Mixed-Use Activity Centers as well as associated policies and actions would not be implemented. However, since the changes to goals, policies and actions would only be related to changes to the Land Use Map, changes to the Land Use Map are the only variables that may increase or decrease the severity of one or more of the significant environmental impacts identified in this Draft EIR.

As demonstrated in the discussion below, the Alternative 2 General Plan Land Use Map is the environmentally superior alternative, as it was developed and refined to reduce as many environmental effects as possible, while still meeting all of the project objectives.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2609 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-6 Alternatives
ALTERNATIVE 1 NO PROJECT
Under Alternative 1, the City would continue to implement the existing General Plan and no changes would be made to address updated OPR General Plan Guidelines, or the requirements of State law. Since adoption of the existing General Plan, State legislation has been passed requiring the City to address new safety and circulation requirements in the General Plan and to further address greenhouse gas emissions.

Additionally, the City recently updated its Housing Element (adopted in February 2022), and the existing General Plan does not conform to State requirements regarding planning for future housing growth. The General Plan goals, policies, and actions, as well as the Land Use Map, would not be updated to address the vision and concerns of the -makers, and other stakeholders that actively participated in the visioning and goal and policy development process.

Alternative 1 would result in the continuation of existing conditions and development levels, as described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, and as shown in Table 3-1 in Section 3.0, Project Description. New growth would be allowed as envisioned under the existing General Plan, with land uses required to be consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Map as shown on Figure 3.3 in Section 3.0. Table 7-2, Alternative 1: No Project Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project, compares the assumed development potential associated with the 2006 General Plan and the General Plan Update 2040 buildout.

Table 7-2
Alternative 1: No Project Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project Alternative Dwelling Units Population
Nonresidential
Square Feet of
Development
Jobs
Jobs per
Housing
Unit
Alternative 1: Existing General
Plan/No Project 22,292 74,455 17,969,188 20,420 0.92
General Plan Update
(Proposed Project) * 32,081 107,152 24,409,917 26,986 0.84 Difference -9,789 -32,697 -6,440,729 -6,566 - Notes:
*Assumes 2040 buildout of the proposed General Plan Update As shown in Table 7-2, Alternative 1 (No Project Alternative) would result in significantly less development within the City compared to the proposed Project. Under Alternative 1, the existing General Plan policy framework would still be in effect, which would constitute a status quo approach to land use regulation in the City.

The Proposed Land Use Map, along with the policy framework proposed by the General Plan Update, longterm housing, employment, and civic needs. The land uses allowed under the General Plan Update would provide opportunities for cohesive new growth at in-fill locations within existing urbanized areas of the City, as well as new growth adjacent to existing urbanized areas and along transportation corridors. A mix and balance of uses to provide an improved ratio of local jobs to population, would ensure that development pays its fair-share of necessary roadway, public service, and other infrastructure

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2610 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-7 Alternatives
improvements, and that increased protection of natural resources would occur. The proposed General Plan Update was prepared in conformance with State laws and regulations associated with the preparation of general plans, including requirements for environmental protection.

Alternative 1 would not include updated policies, particularly those related to housing, greenhouse gases, hazards, complete streets, and environmental justice to address environmental health concerns for disadvantaged communities, as required by State law. This alternative would not include policies proposed in the General Plan Update to ensure protection of environmental resources, both at a project level and under cumulative conditions, consistent with the objectives of CEQA.

Alternative 1 fails to meet several of the basic Project objectives, including the following:

Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by City residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;
Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner; Encourage the revitalization of San Jacinto and other community activity centers; Allow for a range of housing options;
Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents; Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities; Address new requirements of State law; and
Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

Aesthetics
As described in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, impacts related to Aesthetics were found be less than significant.

Both the General Plan Update and No Project Alternative would anticipate increased development within the City through future development that would result in densification of the City. This alternative would result in decreased densities and intensities in the Study Area when compared to the General Plan Update.

Future projects under both development scenarios would be subject to applicable Municipal Code requirements. Buildout of this Alternative would result in 9,789 fewer dwelling units and 6,440,729 fewer -term visual character differently
than buildout of the General Plan Update. Generally, the existing General Plan would not address the visual character of future development to the extent of the General Plan Update. For example, the General Plan Update includes goals and policies to identify and preserve the positive characteristics and features nd western borders as
open space, and provides additional protections for historic buildings. Additionally, this Alternative would not introduce mixed-use land use designations, which would allow a combination of commercial and residential uses together in the same area, creating more pedestrian and transit-oriented neighborhoods.

As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2611 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-8 Alternatives
Agricultural Resources
As described in Section 5.2, Agricultural Resources, the proposed General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to the conversion of farmlands, including Prime Farmland and Unique Farmland, to non- agricultural use.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns on Important Farmlands. The loss of the agricultural land, including Prime Farmland, would result in a significant and unavoidable impact under Alternative 1 and the General Plan Update. Therefore, the impact to agricultural resources under the General Plan Update and Alternative 1 would remain the same. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Air Quality
As described in Section 5.3, Air Quality, construction and operation of future developments would occur within close proximity to sensitive receptors, and there is the potential for localized emissions to exceed regulatory levels. The following significant impacts related to air quality have been identified:

General Plan Update implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

General Plan Update implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

When compared to Alternative 1 (No Project), the General Plan Update includes a range of goals and policies that would reduce air quality emissions, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi modal improvements that would further reduce air quality impacts.

Additionally, when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project), the General Plan Update presents substantially more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential, office, retail, and other uses under increased mixed-use designations. While land uses and development under Alternative 1 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional air quality measures as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in construction emissions, operational emission, and potential reductions in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in air emissions under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Biological Resources
There are various biological resources, including habitat, that occurs throughout the region. As described in Section 5.4, Biological Resources, approval of the General Plan Update would not directly approve or entitle any development or infrastructure projects. However, implementation of the General Plan Update and Land Use Map would allow and facilitate future development in San Jacinto, which could result in adverse impacts to special-status plant and wildlife species, as well as sensitive natural habitat or wildlife

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2612 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-9 Alternatives
movement corridors. Subsequent development projects would be required to comply with the General Plan Update and adopted federal, State, and local regulations for the protection of special status plants and animals, including habitat. The City of San Jacinto has prepared the proposed General Plan Update to include numerous policies and actions intended to protect special status plants and animals, including habitat, from adverse effects associated with future development and improvement projects. However, as specific development is not currently proposed, it cannot be assured at this time that potentially significant impacts to riparian habitat and or other sensitive natural community would be fully mitigated to less than significant despite compliance with the regulatory requirements and implementation of mitigation measures. Therefore, potential impacts to sensitive species and riparian habitat would be considered significant and unavoidable.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns to the General Plan Update, which could result in a significant unavoidable impact to sensitive species and riparian habitat. The proposed General Plan Update would also include updated biological policies and actions aimed at protecting biological resources (as described in detail in Section 5.4), which Alternative 1 would not include. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.5, Cultural Resources, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to cultural resources.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint to the General Plan Update. However, because Alternative 1 would not update cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring that is included in the proposed General Plan Update, impacts to cultural resources would be greater when compared to the General Plan Update which does not include additional and updated policies related to cultural resources. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Energy
As described in Section 5.6, Energy, buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel), and from off-road construction activities (e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2040 buildout of the General Plan Update. Buildout of the General Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations regulating energy usage. Energy use impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

When compared to Alternative 1 (No Project), the General Plan Update includes a range of goals and policies that would reduce energy usage, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi modal improvements that would further reduce per capita energy usage.

Additionally, when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project), the General Plan Update presents substantially more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential, office, retail, and other uses under increased mixed-use designations. While land uses and development under Alternative 1 would be required to adhere to the

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2613 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-10 Alternatives
same local, State, and regional measures regulating energy usage as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in electricity and gas for the operation of buildings, diesel fuel for off-road construction activities, and potential reductions in gasoline due to a decrease in the overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in energy usage under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update.

As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Geology and Soils
As described in Section 5.7, Geology and Soils, geology and soils impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns as the General Plan Update. Since the Study Area is the same under both development scenarios, similar physical constraints related to geology and soils exist. The potential for new development to expose people or structures to adverse effects associated with seismic ground shaking and geologic instabilities would be similar under this Alternative and the General Plan Update. Further, new development would be required to comply with the California Building Code and applicable Municipal Code requirements. However, this Alternative would not include the updated policies related to geologic hazards, including requirements for project reviews and standards for construction and building practices as the General Plan Update (as described in detail in Section 5.7).

As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As described in Section 5.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable greenhouse gas emission impacts.

The City of San Jacinto would exceed the community GHG emission targets established to ensure compliance with SB 32 and other California legislation for future year 2030 and General Plan buildout year 2040. The WRCOG Subregional CAP for the City of San Jacinto determined that with GHG Reduction Measures, there would be an estimated 191,700 MTCO2e in community emissions for 2030, or 3.3 MTCO2e per capita, which is an approximate 6 percent reduction compared to the 2010 baseline but above the 2030 target of 147,932 MTCO2e. In order to further reduce GHG emissions associated with buildout of the General Plan Update, the City has included numerous policies and actions aimed at reducing GHG emissions and promoting sustainability in San Jacinto. While these policies and actions would further assist the City is reducing GHG emissions, the reduction of GHG emissions are not quantifiable, therefore impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

When compared to Alternative 1 (No Project), the General Plan Update includes a range of goals and policies that would reduce GHG emissions, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi modal improvements that would further reduce per capita GHG impacts.

Additionally, when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project), the General Plan Update presents substantially more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential, office, retail, and other uses under increased mixed-use designations. Therefore, impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions would also be reduced under the General Plan Update when compared to the No Project Alternative, which does not include an updated

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2614 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-11 Alternatives
policy document, or an updated land use map that prioritizes mixed uses and higher densities and intensities. As such, this Alternative would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As described in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, all impacts related to hazardous materials, aircraft hazards, and emergency response were found to be less than significant.

The General Plan Update would include updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials. These policies and actions in the General Plan Update would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level, and that business operations comply with federal and State regulations regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that the City has adequate emergency response plans and measures to respond in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance (as described in detail in Section 5.9).

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 1 would result in additional urban uses including commercial, industrial, residential, and mixed-use and public facility development. However, Alternative 1 would not include the updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials that are included as part of the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Hydrology and Water Quality
As described in Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, under all impact areas, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality.

While this Alternative would result in less dense and intense development compared to the General Plan Update, all new development would be subject to applicable stormwater and water quality requirements per the Santa Ana RWQCB. This variation in intensity and land use designation changes would not substantially alter impacts from or to flooding, water quality, or on groundwater supplies because existing federal, State, and local regulations would apply to guard against flood hazards, water quality contamination, or impact on groundwater supplies. Potential hydrology and water quality impact for this Alternative, like the proposed Project, would be less than significant.

Alternative 1 would result in slightly reduced development of housing units and non-residential square feet when compared to the General Plan Update. Compared to the General Plan Update, the potential water quality impacts related to construction and operation would be similar. As described in Section

5.10, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in construction, or long-term impacts to surface water quality from urban stormwater runoff. Future development under all alternatives would also be required to submit a SWPPP with BMPs to the RWQCB and comply with all storm water sewer system (MS4) requirements. It would be expected that impacts related to water quality would be similar under Alternative 1 as compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2615 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-12 Alternatives
Land Use and Planning
The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 1 are long-range land use plans. As described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, all impacts related to land use and planning were found to be less than significant under the General Plan Update. As described previously, the General Plan Update would include adoption of the updated policy document. Under Alternative 1, the existing Land Use Element would continue to provide outdated information that does not reflect the current conditions or goals of the City. This Alternative would prevent the City from achieving some of the core objectives of the General Plan Update to meet new State requirements. In addition, numerous programs and policies within the General Plan Update allow for greater consistency with applicable State and regional plans versus the existing General Plan under Alternative 1. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Mineral Resources
As described in Section 5.12, Mineral Resources, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to mineral resources. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 1 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are, for the most part, either already urbanized or in an open space land use. Given that no mineral resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alternative 1 would be the same and would remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Noise
As described in Section 5.13, Noise, the General Plan Update would result in significant cumulative noise impacts. Development anticipated under this Alternative and the General Plan Update would result in additional noise from construction and operational activities associated with future projects.

Compared to existing traffic noise levels, future (2040) traffic volumes with buildout of the General Plan Update are expected to be up to 11.9 dBA CNEL louder than existing ambient noise levels at existing land uses and would result in substantial increases in ambient noise along most of the studied road segments (see Table 5.13-19). The proposed General Plan includes General Plan Policies intended to minimize exposure to excessive noise, including noise associated with traffic. The decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in roadway noise under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Population and Housing
As shown in Table 7-2, Alternative 1 would allow for 9,789 fewer residential units which would result in 32,697 less residents compared to the General Plan Update. Alternative 1 would not establish updated goals and policies intended to reduce potential growth-related impacts when compared to the General Plan Update. The existing General Plan does not reflect the most current population, employment, and housing numbers or projections, nor does it provide quantitative population, employment, and housing projections for the year 2040. In contrast, the General Plan Update reflects existing population, employment, and housing conditions and provides projections to 2040.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2616 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-13 Alternatives
While the amount and typology of allowable development under the General Plan Update has been crafted to meet future housing needs, Alternative 1,
would not allow the City to adequately plan for population growth and housing to meet its RHNA obligations. The City failing to meet its RHNA obligations would result in the decertification of the adopted Housing Element by the State and potential penalties such as the loss of significant grants. As such, this Alternative would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Public Services and Recreation
As described in Section 5.15, Public Services and Section 5.16, Recreation, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to public services and recreation. New development would place increased demands on public services such as police, fire, schools, parks, libraries, and other governmental services. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions that require payment of impact fees to the City and other public agencies to ensure that additional development allowed does not have adverse impacts on these services and agencies.

Under Alternative 1, the development area and development types would remain similar, however, there would be fewer jobs, dwelling units, and reduced population increase when compared to the General Plan Update and thus, impacts to public services (the demand for police, fire and other public services) would be slightly reduced. Overall, Alternative 1 would have a slightly reduced impact to public services when compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Transportation
As described in Section 5.17, Transportation, transportation impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. The residential and commuter VMT under the proposed General Plan Update is not expected to increase VMT per person above the No Project/Existing General Plan conditions. In fact, home-based VMT per resident is expected to decrease by 6.1 percent and work-based VMT per employee is expected to decrease by approximately 12.6 percent under the General Plan Update when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project). Part of this reduction is attributed to the increasingly balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities within the City with the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Tribal Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the proposed General Plan Update. However, Alternative 1 would not update tribal cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring compared with the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2617 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-14 Alternatives
Utilities and Service Systems
As described in Section 5.19, Utilities and Service Systems, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to utilities and service systems.

New development would place increased demands on utilities. Under Alternative 1, the Study Area would be developed with similar development patterns and uses as the General Plan Update; however, the overall residential intensity/density, and job increases would be reduced. The quantity of infrastructure installed would not be substantially reduced, as this alternative would require similar development patterns and footprints, but the demand for utility services, including wastewater and solid waste services would be less than would be required under the General Plan Update.

Separately, the total storm drainage runoff under Alternative 1 would be approximately the same when compared to the proposed Project, due to the general development footprint remaining the same for this alternative when compared to the General Plan Update. Therefore, demand for utilities would be slightly less under Alternative 1 when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Wildfire
As described in Section 5.20, Wildfire, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to wildfire impacts. Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint when compared to the General Plan Update. However, Alternative 1 would not update policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring compared with the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Irreversible Effects
The proposed Project would have a significant and unavoidable impact associated with irreversible environmental effects as described in Section 6.0, Other CEQA Considerations. Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future.

Land use and development consistent with the General Plan Update would result in irretrievable commitments by introducing development onto sites that are presently undeveloped. The conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses would result in an irretrievable loss of agricultural land, wildlife habitat, and open space. Additionally, development will physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emission, noise, traffic, open space, and natural resources. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs. Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in changes in land use within the Study Area that would commit future generations to these uses.

During the planning horizon, development under Alternative 1 would be reduced in comparison to the General Plan Update. Under cumulative conditions, Alternative 1 would result in less residential and less non-residential floor area (see Table 7-1). Alternative 1 would use nonrenewable resources, including metals, stone, and other materials related to construction, and result in on-going demand for fossil fuels and other resources associated with energy production at levels lower than the proposed Project. The associated irretrievable commitment of nonrenewable resources and permanent conversion of agricultural, and other undeveloped lands under Alternative 1 would remain a significant impact.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2618 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-15 Alternatives
Alternative 1 would have slightly reduced impacts in comparison to the General Plan Update due to reduced development levels. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

ALTERNATIVE 2 REDUCED GROWTH ALTERNATIVE
Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) continues to allow for new development in single-use and mixed-use formats, like those included in the proposed Project, but at lower densities and intensities that are more consistent with those allowed under the current General Plan. Table 7-3, Alternative 2 Compared to the Proposed Project, compares the assumed development potential associated with the Reduced Growth Alternative and the General Plan Update 2040 buildout.

Table 7-3
Alternative 2 Compared to the Proposed Project
Alternative Dwelling Units Population
Nonresidential
Square Feet of
Development
Jobs
Jobs per
Housing
Unit
Alternative 2: Reduced Growth
Alternative 27,742 92,659 23,621,393 23,942 0.86
General Plan Update
(Proposed Project) * 32,081 107,152 24,409,917 26,986 0.84 Difference -4,339 -14,493 -788,524 -3,044 - Notes:
*Assumes 2040 buildout of the proposed General Plan Update The goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan Update would apply to subsequent development, planning, and infrastructure projects under this alternative.

As shown in Table 7-3, Alternative 2 would result in approximately 4,339 fewer housing units and 14,493 fewer residents within San Jacinto when compared to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.

Nonresidential development potential would be reduced by 788,524 square feet and employment opportunities would be decreased under this alternative, with approximately 3,044 fewer jobs created within the City limits when compared to the proposed General Plan Update.

Aesthetics
As described in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, impacts related to Aesthetics were found be less than significant.

Both the General Plan Update and Reduced Growth Alternative would anticipate increased development and associated densification within the City. The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would allow for an increase in intensity and density of the existing land uses than is currently allowed. However, as noted above, this alternative would likely result in decreased densities and intensities and subsequent reduced building heights in the Study Area when compared to the General Plan Update.

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would provide guidance as to the intensity and density of development, including limiting the scale and height to ensure any high-density residential development is compatible with the surrounding area. Future projects under both development scenarios

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2619 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-16 Alternatives
would be subject to applicable Municipal Code requirements and be guided by relevant General Plan Update policies. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Agricultural Resources
As described in Section 5.2, Agricultural Resources the proposed General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to the conversion of farmlands, including Prime Farmland and Unique Farmland, to non- agricultural use.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns on Important Farmlands. The loss of the agricultural land, including Prime Farmland, would result in a significant and unavoidable impact under Alternative 2. Therefore, the impact under Alternative 2 compared to the proposed Project would remain the same. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Air Quality
As described in Section 5.3, Air Quality, construction and operation of future developments would occur within close proximity to sensitive receptors, and there is the potential for localized emissions to exceed regulatory levels. The following significant impacts related to air quality have been identified:

General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

General Plan implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
ity.

While land uses and development under Alternative 2 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional air quality measures as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in construction emissions, operational emission, and potential reductions in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in air emissions under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update, although impact would remain significant and unavoidable.

Biological Resources
There are various biological resources, including habitat, that occurs throughout the region. As described in Section 5.4, Biological Resources, approval of the General Plan Update would not directly approve or entitle any development or infrastructure projects. However, implementation of the General Plan Update and Land Use Map would allow and facilitate future development in San Jacinto, which could result in adverse impacts to special-status plant and wildlife species, as well as sensitive natural habitat or wildlife movement corridors. Subsequent development projects would be required to comply with the General Plan Update and adopted federal, State, and local regulations for the protection of special status plants and animals, including habitat. The City of San Jacinto has prepared the proposed General Plan Update to

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2620 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-17 Alternatives
include numerous policies and actions intended to protect special status plants and animals, including habitat, from adverse effects associated with future development and improvement projects. However, as specific development is not currently proposed, it cannot be assured at this time that potentially significant impacts to riparian habitat and or other sensitive natural community would be fully mitigated to less than significant despite compliance with the regulatory requirements and implementation of mitigation measures. Therefore, potential impacts to sensitive species and riparian habitat would be considered significant and unavoidable.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns as the General Plan Update, which could result in a significant unavoidable impact to sensitive species and riparian habitat. The proposed General Plan Update and Alternatives 2 would also include updated biological policies and actions aimed at protecting biological resources (as described in detail in Section 5.4). Therefore, impacts to biological resources under Alternative 2 would remain the same when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.5, Cultural Resources, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to cultural resources.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the proposed Project. Additionally, Alternative 2 would update cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the proposed General Plan Update. The impact under Alternatives 2 would remain the same compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Energy
As described in Section 5.6, Energy, buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel), and from off-road construction activities (e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2040 buildout of the General Plan Update. Buildout of the General Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations regulating energy usage. Energy use impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

While land uses and development under Alternative 2 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional measures regulating energy usage as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in electricity and gas for the operation of buildings, diesel fuel for off-road construction activities, and potential reductions in gasoline due to a decrease in the overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in energy usage under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update.

As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2621 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-18 Alternatives
Geology and Soils
As described in Section 5.7, Geology and Soils, geology and soils impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns to the General Plan Update. Since the Study Area is the same under both development scenarios, similar physical constraints related to geology and soils exist. The potential for new development to expose people or structures to adverse effects associated with seismic ground shaking and geologic instabilities would be similar under this Alternative and the General Plan Update. Further, new development would be required to comply with the California Building Code and applicable Municipal Code requirements. The General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would also include updated policies related to geologic hazards, including requirements for project reviews and standards for construction and building practices (as described in detail in Section 5.7).

Therefore, impacts related to Geology and Soils would generally remain the same as the General Plan Update under Alternative 2. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As described in Section 5.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable greenhouse gas emission impacts.

The City of San Jacinto would exceed the community GHG emission targets established to ensure compliance with SB 32 and other California legislation for future year 2030 and General Plan buildout year 2040. The WRCOG Subregional CAP for the City of San Jacinto determined that with GHG Reduction Measures, there would be an estimated 191,700 MTCO2e in community emissions for 2030, or 3.3 MTCO2e per capita, which is an approximate 6 percent reduction compared to the 2010 baseline but above the 2030 target of 147,932 MTCO2e. In order to further reduce GHG emissions associated with buildout of the General Plan Update, the City has included numerous policies and actions aimed at reducing GHG emissions and promoting sustainability in San Jacinto. While these policies and actions would further assist the City is reducing GHG emissions, the reduction of GHG emissions are not quantifiable, therefore impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

Under Alternative 2, the Study Area would be developed with similar uses as the General Plan Update, but the potential increase in total dwelling units, population, and jobs would be slightly reduced. The reduced residential development potential and resulting population may decrease total greenhouse gas emissions when compared to the General Plan Update. The General Plan Update and Alternative 2 include a range of goals and policies that would reduce GHG emissions, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi modal improvements that would further reduce per capita GHG impacts. Both the General Plan Update and Alternative 2 present more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential, office, retail, and other uses under increased mixed-use designations. However, the greenhouse gas emissions impact would be decreased slightly under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update, although GHG impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2622 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-19 Alternatives
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As described in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, all impacts related to hazardous materials, aircraft hazards, and emergency response were found to be less than significant.

The General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would include updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials. These policies and actions in the General Plan Update would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level, and that business operations comply with federal and State regulations regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that the City has adequate emergency response plans and measures to respond in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance (as described in detail in Section 5.9).

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would result in additional urban uses including commercial, industrial, residential, and mixed-use and public facility development. Impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials and emergency response under Alternative 2 would remain the same when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Hydrology and Water Quality
As described in Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, under all impact areas, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality.

While this Alternative would result in less dense and intense development compared to the General Plan Update, all new development would be subject to applicable stormwater and water quality requirements per the Santa Ana RWQCB. This variation in intensity and land use designation changes would not substantially alter impacts from or to flooding, water quality, or on groundwater supplies because existing federal, State, and local regulations would apply to guard against flood hazards, water quality contamination, or impact on groundwater supplies. Potential hydrology and water quality impacts for this alternative, like the proposed Project, would be less than significant.

Alternative 2 would result in slightly reduced development of housing units and non-residential square feet when compared to the General Plan Update. Compared to the General Plan Update, the potential water quality impacts related to construction and operation would be similar. As described in Section

5.10, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in construction, or long-term impacts to surface water quality from urban stormwater runoff. Future development under all alternatives would also be required to submit a SWPPP with BMPs to the RWQCB and comply with all storm water sewer system (MS4) requirements. It would be expected that impacts related to water quality would be similar under Alternative 2 as compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Land Use and Planning
The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 2 are long-range land use plans. As described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, all impacts related to land use and planning were found to be less

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2623 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-20 Alternatives
than significant under the General Plan Update. As described previously, the General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would include adoption of the updated policy document. Therefore, Alternative 2 would result in the same impact level as the General Plan Update. Alternative 2 would update current land use designations, and similar to the General Plan Update would be more effective in promoting and encouraging more compact urban development and revitalization through mixed use development. In addition, numerous programs and policies within the General Plan Update allow for greater consistency with applicable State and regional plans versus the existing General Plan, and would also promote efficiency in the delivery of urban services, and local agency coordination. Therefore, impacts related to land use and planning would generally remain the same under Alternative 2 as compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Mineral Resources
As described in Section 5.12, Mineral Resources, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to mineral resources. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are, for the most part, either already urbanized or in an open space land use. Given that no mineral resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be the same and would remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Noise
As described in Section 5.13, Noise, the General Plan Update would result in significant cumulative noise impacts. Development anticipated under this Alternative and the General Plan Update would result in additional noise from construction and operational activities associated with future projects.

Compared to existing traffic noise levels, future (2040) traffic volumes with buildout of the General Plan Update are expected to be up to 11.9 dBA CNEL louder than existing ambient noise levels at existing land uses and would result in substantial increases in ambient noise along most of the studied road segments (see Table 5.13-19). The proposed General Plan and Alternative 2 include General Plan Policies intended to minimize exposure to excessive noise, including noise associated with traffic. While land uses and development under Alternative 2 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in roadway noise under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, this Alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed Project, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Population and Housing
Similar to the General Plan Upd environmental baseline
conditions and development projections through 2040. As shown in Table 7-3, the Reduced Growth Alternative would anticipate 4,339 fewer residential units compared to the General Plan Update, which would result in 14,493 less residents compared to Alternative 2. Both the General Plan Update and Reduced Growth Alternative account for population growth and establish goals and policies to reduce

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2624 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-21 Alternatives
potential growth-related impacts. The net increase in population and housing is nominal and would result in similar less than significant impacts.

This Alternative anticipates approximately 788,524 fewer square feet of non-residential development compared to the proposed Project. The reduction in non-residential development would result in a decrease of approximately 3,044 jobs. The amount and typology of allowable development under the General Plan Update and Alternative 2 has been crafted to meet (RHNA) for future housing needs. While Alternative 2 would provide sufficient development capacity to ablish the affordability of new housing units.

Absent of the ability to rely on the default density, the City would be required to prove in the Housing Element based on substantial evidence that development at densities allowed under Alternative 2 would result in the production of units affordable to all income categories, including extremely very low, very low, low, and moderate income households.

Given the limited development history of similar projects in San Jacinto and the region, it would be challenging to provide the evidence required to prove the affordability of units a density of 22 du/ac, although this option is allowed by State Housing La
provided to accommodate its RHNA. However, since the lower density does not preclude the City from impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be the same and would remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Public Services and Recreation
As described in Section 5.15, Public Services and Section 5.16, Recreation, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to public services and recreation. New development would place increased demands on public services such as police, fire, schools, parks, libraries, and other governmental services. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions that require payment of impact fees to the City and other public agencies to ensure that additional development allowed does not have adverse impacts on these services and agencies.

Under Alternative 2, the development area and development types would remain similar, however, there would be slightly fewer jobs, dwelling units, and reduced population increase when compared to the General Plan Update and thus, impacts to public services (the demand for police, fire and other public services) would be slightly reduced. Overall, Alternative 2 would have a slightly reduced impact to public services when compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 2 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Transportation
As described in Section 5.17, Transportation, transportation impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. The residential and commuter VMT under the proposed General Plan Update is not expected to increase VMT per person above existing conditions. In fact, home-based VMT per resident is expected to decrease by 6.1 percent and work-based VMT per

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2625 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-22 Alternatives
employee is expected to decrease by approximately 12.6 percent under the General Plan Update when compared to the existing General Plan. Part of this reduction is attributed to the increasingly balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities within the City with the General Plan Update.

Alternative 2 also includes a more balanced mix of uses and additional opportunities for increased densities as part of mixed-use developments which includes opportunities for trip internalization, and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling. Overall, Alternative 2 would slightly reduce densities as part of mixed-use developments when compared to the General Plan Update, therefore this alternative would have slightly increased impacts relative to per capita VMT when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Tribal Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the proposed General Plan Update. Additionally, Alternative 2 would update tribal cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the proposed General Plan Update. Potential impacts to tribal cultural resources would be the same under Alternative 2 and the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Utilities and Service Systems
As described in Section 5.19, Utilities and Service Systems, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to utilities and service systems.

New development would place increased demands on utilities. Under Alternative 2, the Study Area would be developed with similar development patterns and uses as the General Plan Update, however, the overall residential intensity/density, and job increases would be reduced. The quantity of infrastructure installed would not be substantially reduced, as this alternative would require similar development patterns and footprints, but the demand for utility services, including wastewater and solid waste services would be less than would be required under the General Plan Update.

Separately, the total storm drainage runoff under Alternative 2 would be approximately the same when compared to the proposed Project, due to the general development footprint remaining the same for this Alternative when compared to the General Plan Update. Overall, demand for utilities would be slightly less under Alternative 2 when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Wildfire
As described in Section 5.20, Wildfire, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to wildfire impacts. Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint when compared to the General Plan Update. Additionally, Alternative 2 would update policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the General Plan Update. Potential impacts associated with

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2626 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-23 Alternatives
wildfire would be the same under Alternative 2 and the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Irreversible Effects
The proposed Project would have a significant and unavoidable impact associated with irreversible environmental effects as described in Section 6.0, Other CEQA Considerations. Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future.

Land use and development consistent with the General Plan Update would result in irretrievable commitments by introducing development onto sites that are presently undeveloped. The conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses would result in an irretrievable loss of agricultural land, wildlife habitat, and open space. Additionally, development will physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emission, noise, traffic, open space, and natural resources. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs. Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in changes in land use within the Study Area that would commit future generations to these uses.

During the planning horizon, development under Alternative 2 would be reduced in comparison to the General Plan Update. Under cumulative conditions, Alternative 2 would result in less residential and less non-residential floor area (see Table 7-1). Alternative 2 would use nonrenewable resources, including metals, stone, and other materials related to construction, and result in on-going demand for fossil fuels and other resources associated with energy production at levels lower than the proposed project. The associated irretrievable commitment of nonrenewable resources and permanent conversion of agricultural, and other undeveloped lands under Alternative 2 would remain a significant impact.

Alternative 2 would have slightly reduced impacts in comparison to the General Plan Update due to reduced development levels. As such, Alternative 2 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

ALTERNATIVE 3 EMPLOYMENT FOCUSED ALTERNATIVE
Alternative 3 (Employment Focused Alternative) reflects a land use pattern designed to promote nonresidential development and employment opportunities. Alternative 3 modifies the uses allowed within the Mixed-Use land use designation to only allow for a mix of nonresidential (commercial, industrial, and business park) land uses while precluding residential development. Alternative 3 also eliminates the Downtown Village (DV) land use; for parcels designated as DV in the proposed Project, Alternative 3 designates these parcels for Commercial development. Table 7-4, Alternative 3 Compared to the Proposed Project, compares the assumed development potential associated with the Employment Focused Alternative and the General Plan Update 2040 buildout.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2627 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-24 Alternatives
Table 7-4
Alternative 3 Compared to the Proposed Project
Alternative Dwelling Units Population
Nonresidential
Square Feet of
Development
Jobs
Jobs per
Housing
Unit
Alternative 3: Employment
Focused Alternative 19,432 64,902 20,321,953 20,639 1.06 General Plan Update
(Proposed Project) * 32,081 107,152 24,409,917 26,986 0.84 Difference -12,649 -42,250 -4,087,964 -6,347 - Notes:
*Assumes 2040 buildout of the proposed General Plan Update The goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan Update would apply to subsequent development, planning, and infrastructure projects under this alternative.

As shown in Table 7-4, Alternative 3 would result in approximately 12,649 fewer housing units and 42,250 fewer residents within San Jacinto when compared to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.

Nonresidential square feet would be reduced by 4,087,964 square feet and employment opportunities would be decreased under this alternative, with approximately 6,347 fewer jobs created within the City limits when compared to the proposed General Plan.

Aesthetics
As described in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, impacts related to Aesthetics were found be less than significant.

Both the General Plan Update and Employment Focused Alternative would anticipate increased development and associated densification within the City. The proposed General Plan and Alternative 3 would allow for an increase in intensity and density of the existing land uses than currently allowed.

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 3 would provide guidance as to the intensity and density of development, including limiting the scale and height to ensure any high-density residential development is compatible with the surrounding area. Future projects under both development scenarios would be subject to applicable Municipal Code requirements and be guided by relevant General Plan Update policies. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Agricultural Resources
As described in Section 5.2, Agricultural Resources, the proposed General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to the conversion of farmlands, including Prime Farmland and Unique Farmland, to non- agricultural use.

Alternative 3 would result in similar development patterns on Important Farmlands as the General Plan Update. The loss of the agricultural land, including Prime Farmland, would result in a significant and unavoidable impact under Alternative 3. Therefore, the impact under Alternative 3 would remain the

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2628 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-25 Alternatives
same compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Air Quality
As described in Section 5.3, Air Quality, construction and operation of future developments will occur within close proximity to sensitive receptors, and there is the potential for localized emissions to exceed regulatory levels. The following significant impacts related to air quality have been identified:

General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

General Plan implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
air quality.

While land uses and development under Alternative 3 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional air quality measures as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in construction emissions, operational emission, and potential reductions in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in air emissions under Alternative 3 when compared to the General Plan Update.

Compared to the proposed Project, Alternative 3 would create a more equal balance of housing and employment opportunities. By introducing a better balance of jobs and housing in the City, this Alternative would reduce the need for longer commutes and reduce overall VMT and associated air quality emissions.

As such, this Alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed Project, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Biological Resources
There are various biological resources, including habitat, that occurs throughout the region. As described in Section 5.4, Biological Resources, approval of the General Plan Update would not directly approve or entitle any development or infrastructure projects. However, implementation of the General Plan Update and Land Use Map would allow and facilitate future development in San Jacinto, which could result in adverse impacts to special-status plant and wildlife species, as well as sensitive natural habitat or wildlife movement corridors. Subsequent development projects would be required to comply with the General Plan Update and adopted federal, State, and local regulations for the protection of special status plants and animals, including habitat. The City of San Jacinto has prepared the proposed General Plan Update to include numerous policies and actions intended to protect special status plants and animals, including habitat, from adverse effects associated with future development and improvement projects. However, as specific development is not currently proposed, it cannot be assured at this time that potentially significant impacts to riparian habitat and or other sensitive natural community would be fully mitigated to less than significant despite compliance with the regulatory requirements and implementation of mitigation measures. Therefore, potential impacts to sensitive species and riparian habitat would be considered significant and unavoidable.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2629 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-26 Alternatives
Alternative 3 would result in similar development patterns as the General Plan Update, which could result in a significant unavoidable impact to sensitive species and riparian habitat. The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 3 would also include updated biological policies and actions aimed at protecting biological resources (as described in detail in Section 5.4). Therefore, impacts to biological resources under Alternative 3 would remain the same when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.5, Cultural Resources, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to cultural resources.

Alternative 3 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint.

Additionally, Alternative 3 would update cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the proposed General Plan Update. The impact under Alternatives 3 would remain the same compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Energy
As described in Section 5.6, Energy, buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel), and from off-road construction activities (e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2040 buildout of the General Plan Update. Buildout of the General Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations regulating energy usage. Energy use impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

While land uses and development under Alternative 3 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional measures regulating energy usage as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in electricity and gas for the operation of buildings, diesel fuel for off-road construction activities, and potential reductions in gasoline due to a decrease in the overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in energy usage under Alternative 3 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update.

Compared to the General Plan Update, Alternative 3 would create a more equal balance of housing and employment opportunities. By introducing a better balance of jobs and housing in the City, this Alternative would reduce the need for longer commutes and reduce overall VMT and associated use of energy resources such as gasoline. As such, this Alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed Project.

Geology and Soils
As described in Section 5.7, Geology and Soils, geology and soils impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

Alternative 3 would result in similar development patterns as the General Plan Update. Since the Study Area is the same under both development scenarios, similar physical constraints related to geology and

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2630 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-27 Alternatives
soils exist. The potential for new development to expose people or structures to adverse effects associated with seismic ground shaking and geologic instabilities would be similar under this Alternative and the General Plan Update. Further, new development would be required to comply with the California Building Code and applicable Municipal Code requirements. Like the proposed Project, Alternative 3 would also include updated policies related to geologic hazards, including requirements for project reviews and standards for construction and building practices (as described in detail in Section 5.7).

Therefore, impacts related to Geology and Soils would generally remain the same under Alternative 3. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As described in Section 5.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable greenhouse gas emission impacts.

The City of San Jacinto would exceed the community GHG emission targets established to ensure compliance with SB 32 and other California legislation for future year 2030 and General Plan buildout year 2040. The WRCOG Subregional CAP for the City of San Jacinto determined that with GHG Reduction Measures, there would be an estimated 191,700 MTCO2e in community emissions for 2030, or 3.3 MTCO2e per capita, which is an approximate 6 percent reduction compared to the 2010 baseline but above the 2030 target of 147,932 MTCO2e. In order to further reduce GHG emissions associated with buildout of the General Plan Update, the City has included numerous policies and actions aimed at reducing GHG emissions and promoting sustainability in San Jacinto. While these policies and actions would further assist the City is reducing GHG emissions, the reduction of GHG emissions are not quantifiable, therefore impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

Under Alternative 3, the Study Area would be developed with similar uses as the General Plan Update, but the total increase in dwelling units, population, and jobs would be slightly reduced. The decrease in total residential unit count and population may decrease the total greenhouse gas emissions. As such, the greenhouse gas emissions impact is decreased slightly under Alternative 3 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. The General Plan Update and Alternative 3 both include a range of goals and policies that would reduce GHG emissions, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets and multi modal improvements that would further reduce per capita GHG impacts.

Additionally, both the General Plan Update and Alternative 3 present opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential, office, retail, and other uses under increased mixed-use designations. Compared to the proposed Project, Alternative 3 would create a more equal balance of housing and employment opportunities. By introducing a better balance of jobs and housing in the City, this Alternative would reduce the need for longer commutes and reduce overall VMT and associated greenhouse gas emissions.

As such, this Alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed Project, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2631 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-28 Alternatives
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As described in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, all impacts related to hazardous materials, aircraft hazards, and emergency response were found to be less than significant.

The General Plan Update and Alternative 3 would include updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials. These policies and actions in the General Plan Update would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level, and that business operations comply with federal and State regulations regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that the City has adequate emergency response plans and measures to respond in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance (as described in detail in Section 5.9).

Alternative 3 would result in additional urban uses including commercial, industrial, residential, and mixed-use and public facility development. Impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials and emergency response under Alternative 3 would remain the same when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Hydrology and Water Quality
As described in Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, under all impact areas, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality.

While this Alternative would result in less dense and intense development compared to the General Plan Update, all new development would be subject to applicable stormwater and water quality requirements per the Santa Ana RWQCB. This variation in intensity and land use designation changes would not substantially alter impacts from or to flooding, water quality, or on groundwater supplies because existing federal, State, and local regulations would apply to guard against flood hazards, water quality contamination, or impact on groundwater supplies. Impact for each alternative, like the proposed Project, would be less than significant.

Alternative 3 would result in reduced development of housing units and non-residential square feet when compared to the General Plan Update. Compared to the General Plan Update, the potential water quality impacts related to construction and operation would be similar. As described in Section 5.10, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in construction, or long-term impacts to surface water quality from urban stormwater runoff. Future development under Alternative 3 would also be required to submit a SWPPP with BMPs to the RWQCB and comply with all storm water sewer system (MS4) requirements. It would be expected that impacts related to water quality would be similar under Alternative 3 as compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Land Use and Planning
The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 3 are long-range land use plans. As described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, all impacts related to land use and planning were found to be less

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2632 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-29 Alternatives
than significant under the General Plan Update. As described previously, the General Plan Update and Alternatives 3 would include adoption of the updated policy document consistent with the General Plan Update. Therefore, Alternative 3 would also result in the same impact level as the General Plan Update.

Alternative 3 would update current land use designations, and the General Plan would be more effective in promoting and encouraging more compact urban development and revitalization through mixed use development. In addition, numerous programs and policies within the General Plan Update policy document allow for greater consistency with applicable State and regional plans versus the existing General Plan, and would also promote efficiency in the delivery of urban services, and local agency coordination. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Mineral Resources
As described in Section 5.12, Mineral Resources, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to mineral resources. Alternative 3, like the General Plan Update, would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are, for the most part, either already urbanized or in an open space land use. Given that no mineral resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alterative 3 would be the same and remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Noise
As described in Section 5.13, Noise, the General Plan Update would result in significant cumulative noise impacts. Development anticipated under this Alternative and the General Plan Update would result in additional noise from construction and operational activities associated with future projects.

Compared to existing traffic noise levels, future (2040) traffic volumes with buildout of the General Plan Update are expected to be up to 11.9 dBA CNEL louder than existing ambient noise levels at existing land uses and would result in substantial increases in ambient noise along most of the studied road segments (see Table 5.13-19). The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 3 include General Plan Policies intended to minimize exposure to excessive noise, including noise associated with traffic. While land uses and development under Alternative 3 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in roadway noise under Alternative 3 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, this Alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed Project, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Population and Housing
Similar to the General Plan Update, environmental baseline conditions and development projections through 2040. As shown in Table 7-4, the Employment Focus Alternative would anticipate 12,649 fewer residential units, which would result in 42,250 less residents compared to the General Plan Update. Both the General Plan Update and Employment Focus Alternative account for population growth and establish goals and policies to reduce potential growth-related

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2633 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-30 Alternatives
impacts. The net increase in population and housing is nominal and would result in similar less than significant impacts.

This Alternative anticipates approximately 4,087,964 fewer square feet of non-residential development compared to the proposed Project. The reduction in non-residential development would result in a decrease of approximately 6,347 jobs. However, while the amount and typology of allowable development under the General Plan Update has been crafted to meet Allocation (RHNA) for future housing needs, Alternative 3, similar to the existing General Plan, would not allow the City to adequately plan for population growth and housing to meet its RHNA obligations. As such, this Alternative would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Public Services and Recreation
As described in Section 5.15, Public Services and Section 5.16, Recreation, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to public services and recreation. New development would place increased demands on public services such as police, fire, schools, parks, libraries, and other governmental services. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions that require payment of impact fees to the City and other public agencies to ensure that additional development allowed does not have adverse impacts on these services and agencies.

Under Alternative 3, the development area and development types would remain similar, however, there would be slightly fewer jobs, dwelling units, and reduced population increase when compared to the General Plan Update and thus, impacts to public services (the demand for police, fire and other public services) would be slightly reduced. Overall, Alternative 3 would have a slightly reduced impact to public services when compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 3 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Transportation
As described in Section 5.17, Transportation, transportation impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. The residential and commuter VMT under the proposed General Plan Update is not expected to increase VMT per person above existing conditions. In fact, home-based VMT per resident is expected to decrease by 6.1 percent and work-based VMT per employee is expected to decrease by approximately 12.6 percent under the General Plan Update when compared to the existing General Plan. Part of this reduction is attributed to the increasingly balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities within the City with the General Plan Update.

Alternative 3 also includes a more balanced mix of uses as part of mixed-use developments and additional opportunities for increased densities as part of mixed-use developments which includes opportunities for trip internalization, and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling. Overall, Alternative 3 would slightly reduce densities as part of mixed-use developments when compared to the General Plan Update, therefore this alternative would have slightly increased impacts relative to per capita VMT when compacted to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 3 is considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2634 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-31 Alternatives
Tribal Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources.

Alternative 3 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the General Plan Update. Alternative 3 would update tribal cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the proposed General Plan Update. The impact under Alternative 3 compared to the proposed Project would remain the same. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Utilities and Service Systems
As described in Section 5.19, Utilities and Service Systems, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to utilities and service systems.

New development would place increased demands on utilities. Under Alternative 3, the Study Area would be developed with a similar development patterns and uses as the General Plan Update, however, the overall residential intensity/density, and job increases would be reduced. The quantity of infrastructure installed would not be substantially reduced, as this alternative would require similar development patterns and footprints, but the demand for utility services, including wastewater and solid waste services would be less than would be required under the General Plan Update.

Separately, the total storm drainage runoff under Alternative 3 would be approximately the same when compared to the proposed Project, due to the general development footprint remaining the same for this alternative when compared to the General Plan Update. Therefore, demand for utilities would be slightly less under this alternative when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 3 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Wildfire
As described in Section 5.20, Wildfire, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to wildfire impacts. Alternative 3 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the General Plan Update. Alternative 3 would update policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the General Plan Update. The impact under Alternative 3 compared to the proposed Project would remain the same. As such, Alternative 3 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Irreversible Effects
The proposed Project would have a significant and unavoidable impact associated with irreversible environmental effects as described in Section 6.0, Other CEQA Considerations. Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future.

Land use and development consistent with the General Plan Update would result in irretrievable commitments by introducing development onto sites that are presently undeveloped. The conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses would result in an irretrievable loss of agricultural land, wildlife habitat,

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2635 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-32 Alternatives
and open space. Additionally, development will physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emission, noise, traffic, open space, and natural resources. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs. Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in changes in land use within the Study Area that would commit future generations to these uses.

During the planning horizon, development under Alternative 3 would be reduced in comparison to the General Plan Update. Under cumulative conditions, Alternative 3 would result in less residential and less non-residential floor area (see Table 7-1). Alternative 3 would use nonrenewable resources, including metals, stone, and other materials related to construction, and result in on-going demand for fossil fuels and other resources associated with energy production at levels lower than the proposed Project. The associated irretrievable commitment of nonrenewable resources and permanent conversion of agricultural, and other undeveloped lands under Alternative 3 would remain a significant impact.

Alternative 3 would have slightly reduced impacts in comparison to the General Plan Update due to reduced development levels. As such, Alternative 3 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
CEQA requires that an environmentally superior alternative be identified among the alternatives that are analyzed in the EIR. If the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, an EIR must also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(2)). The environmentally superior alternative is that alternative with the least adverse environmental impacts when compared to the General Plan Update.

A comparative analysis of the General Plan Update and each of the Project alternatives is provided in Table 7-5, Comparison of Alternatives, below. As shown in Table 7-5, Alternative 2 (Reduced Mixed Growth Alternative) is the environmentally superior alternative when looked at in terms of all potential environmental impacts. While it would not eliminate
unavoidable impacts, Alternative 2 would lessen the majority of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. All of the alternatives fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level. Additionally, Alternative 1 and 3 would have a new significant and unavoidable impact in regards to Population and Housing, since it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA obligations . Throughout the preparation of the
General Plan Update, the City Council, Planning Commission, and residents all expressed a desire and commitment to ensuring that the General Plan Update
priorities, but also serve as a self-mitigating document and avoids significant environmental impacts to the greatest extent feasible. To that end, the General Plan Update includes the full range of feasible mitigation available to reduce potential impacts to the greatest extent possible.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2636 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-33 Alternatives
Table 7-5
Comparison of Alternatives
Environmental Issue
Alternative 1
(No Project)
Alternative 2
(Reduced Growth)
Alternative 3
(Employment Focused)
Aesthetics = = Agricultural Resources =* =* =*
Air Quality * * * Biological Resources * =* =*
Cultural Resources = =
Energy
Geology and Soils = = Greenhouse Gas Emissions * * Hazards and Hazardous Materials = = Hydrology and Water Quality = = = Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources = = = Noise * * Population and Housing * = * Public Services and Recreation Transportation
Tribal Cultural Resources = = Utilities and Services Systems Wildfire = =
Irreversible Effects
Notes:

Indicates an impact that is greater than the Project (environmentally inferior).

Indicates an impact that is less than the Project (environmentally superior). = Indicates an impact that is equal to the Project (neither environmentally superior nor inferior). * Indicates a significant and unavoidable impact.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2637 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 7-34 Alternatives
This page intentionally left blank.

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2638 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) tS ybri K evA t S et atS ml aP t Stti weH ev AnoyL evA nots waC s onaBs ol oni maC evAll edO ev A nosr ednaS dR nerr a W evA ml aP t S ai b m t S ybri K t S et atS ev AnoyL evA nosr ednaS ver

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2639 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2640 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) tS ybri K evA t S et atS ml aP t Stti weH ev AnoyL evA nots waC s onaBs ol oni maC evAll edO ev A nosr ednaS dR nerr a W evA ml aP t S ai b m t S ybri K t S et atS ev AnoyL evA nosr ednaS ver

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2641 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2642 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 8-1 Report Preparers

8.0 REPORT PREPARERS

8.1 LEAD AGENCY
City of San Jacinto
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Travis Randel, Deputy City Manager Development Services Kevin White, Planning Manager
Caleb Hargis, Administrative Analyst

8.2 PREPARERS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
De Novo Planning Group
180 East Main Street, Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780
Amanda Tropiano, Principal/Project Manager
Ben Ritchie, Principal
Starla Barker, AICP, Principal Planner/EIR Project Manager Ashley Brodkin, Senior Planner
Josh Smith, AICP, Senior Planner
Erik Anderson, Associate Planner
Courtney Marchi, Assistant Planner
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
750 The City Drive, Suite 410
Orange, CA 92868
Mike Alston, Engineering Associate
Tim Erney, Senior Principal Planner
MD Acoustics, LLC
1197 Los Angeles Avenue, Ste. C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Mike Dickerson, INCE-USA
Claire Pincock, INCE-USA
Roma Stromberg, M.S.

Tyler Klassen, EIR

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2643 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | July 2022 8-2 Report Preparers
Duke Cultural Resources Management, LLC
18 Technology Drive, Ste. 103
Irvine, CA 92618
Curt Duke, M.A.

Dean M. Duryea, Jr., M.A.

Benjamin Scherzer, M.S.

Megan Wilson, M.A.

Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A.

EnviroPro Consulting, LLC
32941 Joel Circle
Dana Point, CA 92629
Mitch Marken, Ph.D.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410
Oakland, CA 94612-3604

4.1.i
Packet Pg. 2644 Attachment: Draft Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix A: NOP and NOP Comments

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2645 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2646 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) NOP – City of San Jacinto General Plan Update EIR
December 17, 2020 Page 1 of 6
Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting
San Jacinto General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Date: December 17, 2020
To: State Clearinghouse, Agencies, Organizations and Interested Parties Subject: Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting for the San Jacinto General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report
Scoping Meeting: Wednesday January 6, 2021, 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

The meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

To join telephonically call: (951) 465-7684 ID:436 382 014# To join by computer use this link: https://tinyurl.com/y8ze5zfa Comment Period: Thursday December 17, 2020 to Tuesday January 19, 2021 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of San Jacinto (City) will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of San Jacinto General Plan Update (Plan or Proposed Project). The City is the lead agency for the project. The purpose of this notice is to: (1) serve as a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an EIR pursuant to the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15082; (2) advise and solicit comments and suggestions regarding the scope and content of the EIR to be prepared for the proposed project; and (3) notice the public scoping meeting.

The City determined that the proposed project would require preparation of a full-scope EIR; thus, an Initial Study was not prepared in conjunction with this NOP. Consistent with § 15082(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City will prepare an EIR to address the environmental impacts associated with the project at a programmatic level. The proposed project is a long-term plan consisting of policies that will guide future development activities and City actions. No specific development projects are proposed as part of this General Plan Update. However, the program EIR can serve to streamline environmental review of future projects.

Information regarding the project description, project location, and topics to be addressed in the Draft EIR is provided below. Additional project documents and information are available at the City of San Jacinto, Community Development Department, located at 595 S. San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583, and on-line at: https://sanjacinto.generalplan.org/. Consistent with State of California Executive Order N4.1.j Packet Pg. 2647 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) NOP – City of San Jacinto General Plan Update EIR
December 17, 2020 Page 2 of 6
29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, City Hall is closed to the General Public; however, any person interested in reviewing the additional project documents and information in person may schedule an appointment with City Staff.

For questions regarding this notice, please contact Travis Randel - Community Development Director at (951) 487-7330, or by email: [email protected].

Notice of Preparation Comment Period: The City, as Lead Agency, requests that responsible and trustee agencies, all interested parties, and the Office of Planning and Research, respond in a manner consistent with § 15082(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.4, responsible agencies, trustee agencies and the Office of Planning and Research must submit any comments in response to this notice no later than the comment period deadline identified below. In accordance with the time limits established by CEQA, the NOP public review period will begin on Thursday December 17, 2020 and end on Tuesday January 19, 2021.

In the event that the City does not receive a response from any Responsible or Trustee Agency, or by any interested parties, by the end of the review period, the City may presume that the Responsible Agency, Trustee Agency, or interested party has no response to make (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(b)(2)).

Comments in response to this notice must be submitted to the address below, or by email by the close of the NOP review period, which is 5:00 PM on Tuesday January 19, 2021:

Travis Randel - Community Development Director
City of San Jacinto
595 S. San Jacinto Ave
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Email: [email protected]
Scoping Meeting
The City will hold a scoping meeting to provide an opportunity for agency representatives and the public to assist the City in determining the scope and content of the EIR. The scoping meeting will be held on Wednesday January 6, 2021, at 6 p.m. The meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The scoping meeting will not discuss the merits of the project, but rather the environmental topics to be included in the environmental review.

The meeting may be joined telephonically by calling (951) 465-7684 ID:436 382 014# To join by computer use this link: https://tinyurl.com/y8ze5zfa Public Agency Approvals
The City Council is the final decision-making body for the General Plan Update. Before the City Council considers the proposed project, the Planning Commission will review it and make recommendations to the City Council. While other agencies may be consulted during the General Plan Update process, their approval is not required for adoption of the General Plan. However, subsequent development under the General Plan Update may require approval of state, federal and responsible trustee agencies that may rely on the programmatic EIR for decisions in their areas of expertise.

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2648 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) NOP – City of San Jacinto General Plan Update EIR
December 17, 2020 Page 3 of 6
Project Location and Setting
As shown on Figure 1, the City of San Jacinto is located at the base of the San Jacinto mountains and adjacent to the San Jacinto River. Founded in 1870, and incorporated on April 9, 1888, San Jacinto is one of the County of Riverside's oldest communities with roots that stretch back to the earliest days of California. The City is approximately 26 square miles (16,700 acres) and is located north of the City of Hemet in Western Riverside County. The City sits approximately 27 miles west of the San Bernardino National Forest and approximately 21 miles east of the City of Perris. The 79 Expressway runs through the City and is the primary corridor for regional access to San Jacinto. The project’s regional location is shown in Figure 1.

The Planning Area is the geographic area for which the Plan provides a framework for long-term growth and resource conservation. State law requires the Plan to include all territory within San Jacinto’s incorporated area as well as "any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency's judgment bears relation to its planning" (California Government Code Section 65300). The Planning Area, as shown in Figure 2, includes the entire city limits (approximately 16,700 acres) as well as the City of San Jacinto’s Sphere of Influence (approximately 6,100 acres); the entire Planning Area is approximately 22,800 acres.

Project Description
The City of San Jacinto is preparing a comprehensive update to its existing General Plan. The updated San Jacinto General Plan is expected to be adopted in 2021 and will guide the City’s development and conservation through land use objectives and policy guidance. The Plan is intended to be an expression of the community’s vision for the City and Planning Area and constitutes the policy and regulatory framework by which future development projects will be reviewed and public improvements will be implemented.

The City will implement the Plan by requiring development, infrastructure improvements, and other projects to be consistent with its policies and by implementing the actions included in the Plan.

State law requires the City to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of its planning area. The Plan must include land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety, and environmental justice elements, as specified in Government Code Section 65302, to the extent that the issues identified by State law exist in the City’s planning area.

The San Jacinto General Plan will include a comprehensive set of goals, policies, and actions (implementation measures), as well as a revised Land Use Map (Figure 3).

A goal in the Plan is the broadest statement of community values. It is a generalized ideal which provides a sense of direction for action. They are overall statements of desired future conditions. The essence of the Plan is contained within its policies. Policies are statements which further refine the goals, and guide the course of action the City must take to achieve the goals in the Plan. It is important to note that policies are guides for decision makers, not decisions themselves. Action items are steps or actions the City should take to implement the Plan.

Additional elements that relate to the physical development of the city may also be addressed in the Plan.

The degree of specificity and level of detail of the discussion of each Plan Element need only reflect local conditions and circumstances. The San Jacinto General Plan will include all of the State-mandated elements, and will address two optional topics: Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability and Community Facilities. The City is also preparing a Focused Zoning Ordinance Update to implement the General Plan and create consistency between the land use map and the Zoning Ordinance. The Focused Zoning Ordinance Update will also be analyzed under the General Plan EIR.

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2649 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) NOP – City of San Jacinto General Plan Update EIR
December 17, 2020 Page 4 of 6
The Plan is being prepared to address the requirements of State law and the relevant items addressed in Government Code Section 65300 et seq. The San Jacinto General Plan is intended to reflect the desires and vision of San Jacinto residents, businesses, the Planning Commission, and City Council.

The following objectives were identified for the proposed update to the General Plan:

1. Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;

2. Protect and enhance San Jacinto’s unique history,small-town character, and sense of community;

3. Promote San Jacinto as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community;

4. Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner;

5. Encourage mixed use development patterns that promote vibrant commercial and residential areas;

6. Allow for a range of high-quality housing options;

7. Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents;

8. Create a more balanced jobs-housing ratio within the community;

9. Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities;

10. Maintain strong fiscal sustainability and continue to provide efficient and adequate public services;

11. Address new requirements of State law; and

12. Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

Growth Projections
While no specific development projects are proposed as part of the San Jacinto General Plan Update, the General Plan will accommodate future growth in San Jacinto, including new businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and new residential uses. The buildout analysis assumes a 20-year planning horizon (the level of development that could reasonability be expected by the year 2040), while the year 2060 is assumed to be the full buildout year of the General Plan (the point at which all parcels in the City are developed according to their General Plan land use designation). The 20-year planning horizon (2040) represents approximately 50% of total buildout; this expected pace of growth is based on historical development patterns in and around San Jacinto and development trends projected for Western Riverside County.

Table 1 provides a statistical summary of the buildout potential associated with the Proposed Land Use Map compared to existing on-the-ground conditions and the currently adopted General Plan.

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2650 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) NOP – City of San Jacinto General Plan Update EIR
December 17, 2020 Page 5 of 6
Table 1 Planning Horizon Year (2040) Statistical Summary Housing
Units Population Nonresidential Square Footage Jobs
Jobs per
Housing
Unit
City Limits Only
Existing Conditions (12/1/2020) 15,322 51,174 2,357,363 6,147 0.40 Current General Plan (Development
Potential by 2040) 21,095 70,457 17,771,319 18,641 0.88 Proposed Land Use Map
(Development Potential by 2040) 30,604 102,217 24,018,044 24,671 0.80 New Development Potential Over
Existing Conditions by 2040 15,282 51,043 21,660,681 19,524 - New Development Potential Over
Current General Plan Development
Potential by 2040
9,509 31,760 6,246,724 7,031 -
Sphere of Influence Area Only
Existing Conditions (12/1/2020) 508 1,698 217,995 1,165 2.29 Current General Plan (Development
Potential by 2040) 1,197 3,998 200,627 1,782 1.49
Proposed Land Use Map
(Development Potential by 2040) 1,478 4,935 395,183 1,317 0.89 New Development Potential Over
Existing Conditions by 2040 969 3,237 177,189 152 -
New Development Potential Over
Current General Plan Development
Potential by 2040
281 937 194,556 (465) -
Planning Area (City Limits and Sphere of Influence)
Existing Conditions (12/1/2020) 15,830 52,872 25,753,58 7,312 0.46 Current General Plan (Development
Potential by 2040) 22,292 74,455 17,971,946 20,422 0.92 Proposed Land Use Map
(Development Potential by 2040) 32,081 108,152 24,413,227 26,989 0.84 New Development Potential Over
Existing Conditions by 2040 16,252 54,280 21,837,869 19,676 - New Development Potential Over
Current General Plan Development
Potential by 2040
9,789 32,697 6,441,281 6,566 -
Note: The statistical summary is based a 20-year planning horizon (the level of development that could reasonability be expected by the year 2040).

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2651 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) NOP – City of San Jacinto General Plan Update EIR
December 17, 2020 Page 6 of 6
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The proposed project could potentially affect the following environmental factors, and each will be addressed in the EIR:
• Aesthetics
• Air Quality
• Agriculture and Forestry Resources
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Energy
• Geology/Soils
• Greenhouse Gases Emissions
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Hydrology/Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
• Mineral Resources
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Parks and Recreation
• Transportation and Traffic
• Tribal Cultural Resources
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfires
• Mandatory Findings of Significance
Attachments
• Figure 1: Regional Location Map
• Figure 2: Planning Area
• Figure 3: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2652 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y

R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y

S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y

S A N D I E G O C O U N T Y S A N D I E G O C O U N T Y §¨¦10
§¨¦215
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦15
§¨¦5
§¨¦215
§¨¦215
§¨¦5
§¨¦10
£¤66
£¤243
£¤66
£¤371
UV241
UV142
UV330
UV261UV133
UV74
UV71
UV79
UV79
UV79
UV243
UV241 UV1
UV138
UV74
UV83
UV259
UV111
UV210
UV60
UV74
UV189
UV30
UV60
UV31
UV73
UV18
UV79
UV247
UV74
UV79
UV74
UV18
UV111
UV91
UV76
UV62
UV74
UV38

MOJAVE R

SAN JACINTO R
SANTA
A
NA
R

SANTA ANA R

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
NOP Figure 1
Regional Location Map 0 P5 10
Miles

P A C I F I C

O C E A N
Legend
City of San Jacinto
San Jacinto Sphere of Influence
Other Incorporated Area
County Boundary
Sources: California State Geoportal. Map date: December 4, 2020.

Lake
Elsinore
Lake
Matthews
Skinner
Reservoir
Whitewater
River

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2653 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Soboba Rd
Mounta ni Ave
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Pa ml
Washington Ave
Cottonwood Ave
E
s
p
l
a
n
a
d
eA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
Menlo Ave
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
Main St
Commonwealth Ave
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7th St
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7th St
Record Rd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
Deegan St
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
Ramona Expy
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
Oakland Ave
UV79
UV79

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
NOP Figure 2
Planning Area

H E M E T

B E A U M O N T
0 P½
1 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Legend
City of San Jacinto
San Jacinto Sphere of Influence
Neighboring City
Neighboring Sphere of Influence
Sources: City of San Jacinto; Riverside County. Map date: March 11, 2019.

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2654 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Soboba Rd
Mounta ni Ave
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Pa ml
Washington Ave
Cottonwood Ave
E
s
p
l
a
n
a
d
eA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
Menlo Ave
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
Main St
Commonwealth Ave
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7th St
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7th St
Record Rd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
Deegan St
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
Ramona Expy
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
Oakland Ave
UV79
UV79

CITY OF SAN JACINTO

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
NOP Figure 3
Proposed General Plan
Land Use Map

H E M E T

B E A U M O N T
0 P½
1 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Legend
City of San Jacinto
San Jacinto Sphere of Influence
Neighboring City
Land Use Designation
VLDR: Very Low Density Residential
LDR: Low Density Residential
MDR: Medium Density Residential
HDR: High Density Residential
VHDR: Very High Density Residential
MU: Mixed Use
C: Commercial
DV: Downtown Village
BP: Business Park
I: Industrial
PI: Public/Institutional
OS: Open Space
P: Park
SPA: Specific Plan Area
Water
Sources: City of San Jacinto; Riverside County. Map date: December 3, 2020

TRAILS SP
SP 01-03

VILLAGES SP
SP 01-04

COVE SP
SP 01-01

ESPLANADE SP
SP 01-02
SOBOBA

SPRINGS SP
SP 01-85
RANCHO

SAN JACINTO SP
SP 01-00

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2655 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) 1/19/2021 De Novo Planning Group Mail - FW: Correction: Re: Comments - NOP for San Jacinto General Plan Update https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=d2c530bd39&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689332843307469127&simpl=msg-f%3A16893328433… 2/4 From: Dawson, Timothy@DOC <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 1:32 PM
To: General Plan <[email protected]>
Subject: Correction: Re: Comments - NOP for San Jacinto General Plan Update [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of San Jacinto -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open aachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
Dear Mr. Randel,
My apologies, although the subject line in my previous email said “Milpitas”, the email and comments were meant for the City of San Jacinto, and is noted in the corrected email subject line. My apologies for the confusion.

Tim Dawson
From: Dawson, Timothy@DOC
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Comments - NOP for Milpitas General Plan Update Dear Mr. Randel,
The California Geological Survey (CGS) has received the Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of San Jacinto General Plan Update. This letter conveys suggestions and recommendations from the California Geological Survey concerning geologic and soils issues related to the planning area.

The California Geological Survey recommends the General Plan update address the following items and issues within the planning area:
1) Geologic Hazards
Numerous potential geologic hazards exist within the City of San Jacinto planning area. Each of the hazards listed below should be addressed in the General Plan update. a. Liquefaction and Landslide Hazards

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2656 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) 1/19/2021 De Novo Planning Group Mail - FW: Correction: Re: Comments - NOP for San Jacinto General Plan Update https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=d2c530bd39&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689332843307469127&simpl=msg-f%3A16893328433… 3/4 CGS has not yet completed seismic hazard zone mapping for areas within the City of San Jacinto.

The County of Riverside has identified areas of potential liquefaction which can be accessed via the Riverside County Mapping Portal here: https://gisopendata-countyofriverside.opendata. arcgis.com/
b. Faulting Hazards – CGS has established Earthquake Fault Zones within and nearby the City of San Jacinto planning area. Specifically, Holocene-active strands of the San Jacinto fault zone traverse the planning area. Digital versions of these maps (PDF and Shapefiles) and associated reports can be downloaded from the CGS Information Warehouse, here:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/regulatorymaps/ c. Ground Shaking Hazards – The City of San Jacinto planning area is located near many active faults capable of producing severe ground shaking during an earthquake. The EIR should include a discussion of nearby active faults and the relative likelihood of the planning area to experience strong ground shaking. The earthquake shaking potential for various regions in California can be viewed at the following website: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/psha. 2) Regional and Site-Specific Geology
The EIR update should include a brief discussion of the geologic history of the area and a description of the rock types in the planning area.
3) Soils
The EIR update should consider including a summary on the types of soils present in the planning area and a discussion of the soil characteristics pertinent to development, such as source material, geographic setting, drainage characteristic, permeability, and the risk of erosion and soil expansion. The Natural Resources Conservation Service has an interactive soil map available at the following website:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns with the comments in this letter.

Sincerely,
Tim Dawson
Timothy Dawson
Senior Engineering Geologist
Seismic Hazards Assessment and Zonation
California Geological Survey
California Department of Conservation

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2657 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) 1/19/2021 De Novo Planning Group Mail - FW: Correction: Re: Comments - NOP for San Jacinto General Plan Update https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=d2c530bd39&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689332843307469127&simpl=msg-f%3A16893328433… 4/4 1900 S. Norfolk St., Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94403
(650) 350-7307
[email protected]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication.

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2658 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Inland Deserts Region
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
January 15, 2021
Sent via email
Travis Randel
City of San Jacinto
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
[email protected]
Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report City of San Jacinto General Plan Update
State Clearinghouse No. 2020120312
Dear Mr. Randel:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) from the City of San Jacinto (City) for the City’s General Plan Update (Project) pursuant the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.1
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife.

Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code.

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources, and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a).) CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (Id., § 1802.) Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public 1 CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The “CEQA Guidelines” are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000.

4.1.j
Packet Pg. 2659 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix A - NOP and NOP Comments (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Travis Randel
City of San Jacinto
January 15, 2021

Page 2 of 14 ends
← All documents from this meeting