Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 5 of 26)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 3949

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN JACINTO ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND A

STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS

PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT, CERTIFYING THE GENERAL PLAN

UPDATE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(SCH #2020120312), AND APPROVING THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto (the “City”) proposes the Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040 Project (the “General Plan Update” or “Project”), a comprehensive update to the City’s existing General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Project sets the overarching policy document that guides land use, housing, transportation, open space, public safety, community services, and other policy decisions throughout the City and the Sphere of Influence; and WHEREAS, the City will implement the General Plan Update by requiring development, infrastructure improvements, and other projects to be consistent with its policies, and by implementing the actions included in the Project; and WHEREAS, prior to the development of the Project, the City conducted extensive public outreach including direct mailing to over 15,000 mailboxes within the City limits; hosted three (3) public workshops in February and March 2019, hosted two (2) popup workshops at the City sponsored Kool August Nights Concert Series in August 2019, conducted a 10 month online survey, hosted two (2) stakeholder focus group sessions in August 2019, and held two public meetings for the Planning Commission and City Council in September and October 2020 respectively to receive feedback on a draft land use policy map; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), the City of San Jacinto is the lead agency for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City determined that a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared in order to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts that could potentially result from the adoption and implementation of the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15082, on December 17, 2020, the City sent to the Office of Planning and Research and each responsible and trustee agency a Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) stating that an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number #2020120312 would be prepared; and

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 2 of 8 ends

WHEREAS, ten (10) comment letters were received in response to the NOP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.9 and State CEQA Guidelines sections 15082(c) and 15083, the City held a duly noticed Scoping Meeting on January 6, 2021, to solicit comments on the scope of the environmental review of the proposed Project, however, no comments were received during the Scoping Meeting; and WHEREAS, a Draft Programmatic EIR (“Draft EIR”) was prepared, incorporating comments received in response to the NOP; and
WHEREAS, the Draft EIR concluded that the proposed Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts relating to: agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15085, a Notice of Completion was prepared and filed with the Office of Planning and Research on July 28, 2022; and
WHEREAS, as required by State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(a), the City provided Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR to the public at the same time that the City sent Notice of Completion to the Office of Planning and Research, on July 28, 2022; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Draft EIR and technical appendices were available for review and inspection at City Hall, on the City’s website, and published in the Press Enterprise; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(e), the Draft EIR was circulated for at least a 45-day public review and comment period from December 31, 2411 to September 12, 2022; and
WHEREAS, during the public review and comment period, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and others pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15086; and WHEREAS, the City received five (5) written comment letters on the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, the City provided copies of its responses to commenting public agencies at least ten (10) days prior to the City’s consideration of the Final EIR on October 14, 2022; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2022, the City released the Final EIR (“Final EIR”), which consists of the Draft EIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft EIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft EIR, written responses to all written comment letters received on the Draft EIR, and errata to the Draft EIR and technical appendices; and

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 3 of 8 ends

WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing to consider the Draft EIR for the Project and solicited comments on the document.

After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City’s consultant team, the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-02 by a unanimous (5-0) vote, recommending that the City Council certify the EIR for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the “EIR” consists of the Final EIR and its attachments and appendices, as well as the Draft EIR and its attachments and appendices (as modified by the Final EIR); and
WHEREAS, all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were sufficiently analyzed in the EIR; and
WHEREAS, as contained herein, the City has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision on the Project; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Public Resources Code and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in connection with the preparation of the EIR which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, the EIR prepared in connection with the Project sufficiently analyzes the Project’s potentially significant environmental impacts and the EIR analyzes a range of feasible alternatives capable of reducing these effects to an even lesser level of significance; and
WHEREAS, the City has made certain findings of fact, as set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein, based upon the oral and written evidence presented to it as a whole and the entirety of the administrative record for the Project, which are incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City finds that environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR as less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section II of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that there are no environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR that are less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures as described in Section III of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that even with the incorporation of all feasible mitigation measures, the environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR that are significant and unavoidable are described in Section IV of Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impacts of the Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section V of Exhibit “A”; and

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 4 of 8 ends

WHEREAS, the potential significant irreversible environmental changes that would result from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section VI of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the existence of any growth-inducing impacts resulting from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section VII of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, alternatives to the proposed Project that might further reduce the already less than significant environmental impacts are described in Section VIII of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, because the EIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts, the City explains its reasoning for recommending the adoption of the Project despite those impacts in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, as set forth in Section IX of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including but not limited to the EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Project; and
WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearings conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council and no additional information submitted to the City have produced substantial new information requiring recirculation of the EIR or additional environmental review of the Project under Public Resources Code section 21092.1 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this Resolution, at which time all persons wishing to testify were heard and the Project was fully considered; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that it has been presented with the EIR which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA and the State

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 5 of 8 ends

CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds that the EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of “substantial importance” as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation. Therefore, the City Council certifies the EIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings.

SECTION 3. The City Council adopts the “CEQA Findings of Fact” where were prepared in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines sections 15091 and which are attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 4. Based upon the entire record before it, including the EIR, Findings of Fact, and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council approves the proposed Project.

SECTION 5. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at City Hall, 595 S.

San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. The custodian for these records is Travis Randel. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6.

SECTION 6. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare and file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of Riverside within five working days of the execution of this Resolution and approval of the Project and with the Office of Planning and Research.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 6 of 8 ends

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_____________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________________
Michael J. Maurer, City Attorney

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 7 of 8 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO)

CERTIFICATION
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, CA, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution No. 3949 for which the original is on file in my office.

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL on this 15th day of November 2022. ______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Resolution No. 3949

Page 8 of 8 ends

EXHIBIT “A”

4.1.e
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) -1-

EXHIBIT A

CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT
The California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”) requires that public agencies shall not approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) has been certified that identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects of a project unless the public agency makes one or more written Findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each Finding (State CEQA Guidelines [Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.], § 15091).

This document presents the CEQA Findings of Fact made by the City of San Jacinto, in its capacity as the CEQA lead agency, regarding the Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040 (“General Plan”), evaluated in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“Draft EIR”) and Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) for the Project.

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION
Public Resources Code section 21002 states that “public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]” Section 21002 further states that the procedures required by CEQA “are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects.”
Pursuant to section 21081 of the Public Resources Code, a public agency may only approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed that identifies any significant environmental effects if the agency makes one or more of the following written finding(s) for each of those significant effects accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding:

1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.

2. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency.

3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

As indicated above, section 21002 requires an agency to “avoid or substantially lessen” significant adverse environmental impacts. Thus, mitigation measures that “substantially lessen” significant environmental impacts, even if not completely avoided, satisfy section 21002’s mandate. (Laurel Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City Council (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 515, 521 [“CEQA does not mandate the choice of the environmentally best feasible project if through the imposition of feasible mitigation measures alone the appropriate public agency has reduced environmental

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 2 of 266 ends

damage from a project to an acceptable level”]; Las Virgenes Homeowners Fed., Inc. v. County of Los Angeles (1986) 177 Cal. App. 3d 300, 309 [“[t]here is no requirement that adverse impacts of a project be avoided completely or reduced to a level of insignificance . . . if such would render the project unfeasible”].)
While CEQA requires that lead agencies adopt feasible mitigation measures or alternatives to substantially lessen or avoid significant environmental impacts, an agency need not adopt infeasible mitigation measures or alternatives. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21002.1(c) [if “economic, social, or other conditions make it infeasible to mitigate one or more significant effects on the environment of a project, the project may nonetheless be carried out or approved at the discretion of a public agency”]; see also State CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(a) [an “EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible”].) CEQA defines “feasible” to mean “capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” (Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1.) The State CEQA Guidelines add “legal” considerations as another indicia of feasibility. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15364.) Project objectives also inform the determination of “feasibility.” (Jones v. U.C. Regents (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 818, 828-829.) “‘[F]easibility’ under CEQA encompasses ‘desirability’ to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 401, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 715.) “Broader considerations of policy thus come into play when the decision making body is considering actual feasibility[.]” (Cal. Native Plant Soc’y v.

City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1000 (“Native Plant”); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081(a)(3) [“economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations” may justify rejecting mitigation and alternatives as infeasible] (emphasis added).) Environmental impacts that are less than significant do not require the imposition of mitigation measures. (Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337, 1347.)
The California Supreme Court has stated, “[t]he wisdom of approving . . . any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced.” (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 576.) In addition, perfection in a project or a project’s environmental alternatives is not required; rather, the requirement is that sufficient information be produced “to permit a reasonable choice of alternatives so far as environmental aspects are concerned.” Outside agencies (including courts) are not to “impose unreasonable extremes or to interject [themselves] within the area of discretion as to the choice of the action to be taken.” (Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Com. v. Board of Trustees (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 274, 287.)

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 3 of 266 ends

SECTION II

FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACTS NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION
The City Council hereby finds that the following potential environmental impacts of the General Plan are less than significant and therefore do not require the imposition of Mitigation Measures.

A. AESTHETICS

1. Scenic Vistas
Threshold: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-1, pages 5.1-8 through 5.1- 10)
Explanation: The Study Area is surrounded by mountain and hillside terrain that offer scenic vistas, the view of which are available throughout the Study Area and major roadways. Implementation of the Project would result in new development and intensification of existing urban uses throughout the Study Area that may detract from the existing scenic vistas. However, the General Plan Update Land Use Map would maintain existing designated Open Space areas in the San Jacinto Mountain foothills to the northeast and Lakeview Mountains to the west. Further, the San Jacinto Development Code (SJDC) would regulate maximum building height, building setbacks, building type and intensity, and other development characteristics in place in each zoning district to protect scenic vistas within the Study Area.

SJDC Chapter 17.630 provides for project-specific design review of future development proposals within City limits, which would ensure that development pursuant to the General Plan Update is attractive and cohesive without diminishing the quality of the natural beauty of the general vicinity.

Design review would be required for the construction of any structure, or to relocate, rebuild, or significantly enlarge or modify any existing structure or site within the City. Criteria to be considered includes efficiency of site layout and design, compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed structures with public areas, and consistency with design guidelines/standards, the General Plan, or any other applicable specific plan. Additionally, San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 15.28, Hillside Development, regulates development of hillside areas by relating the number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings to the topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through extensive cut and fill. Accordingly, projects which may impact views of ridgelines would be given particular attention. Future development within the City’s SOI that is under the County’s land use control would be subject to the County’s entitlement requirements, regulations, and design review process.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 4 of 266 ends

Furthermore, the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions are intended to ensure that urbanization of the Study Area would not result in substantial adverse effects on a scenic vista. For example, Policy LU-3.1 ensures the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding area. Policy LU-5.3 identifies and preserves the positive characteristics and features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated system of open space that reflects aesthetics and community identity considerations. Policy RM-1.2 preserves scenic resources in San Jacinto, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms. Policy RM-1.5 requires orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance. Action RM-1e retains the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.

Action RM-1h directs the City to identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update impacts related to having a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.

Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.

Policy LU-3.7: Hillside Development. Conserve hillsides by limiting development on slopes greater than 25 percent and allowing unique planning techniques such as Specific Plans, Planned Unit Developments, and clustered development to reduce grading.

Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting development or neighborhoods.

Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health risks.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 5 of 266 ends

Action LU-3e: During both redevelopment and the development of new projects, encourage the provision and maintenance of setbacks and buffers, such as roadways, topographic features, and open space, to prevent incompatibilities between agricultural and non-agricultural land uses.

Policy LU-5.1: Design Features. Enhance the City's identity with attractive high-quality gateways, city entry signs and design features, cohesive street signs, and other design features at public gathering spaces and other areas, where appropriate.

Policy LU-5.2: Standards and Guidelines. Develop and enforce development standards and objective design guidelines that provide clear direction for achieving quality community design in new development and redevelopment projects.

Policy LU-5.3: Site Planning. Identify and preserve, as feasible, the positive characteristics and features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects.

Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that respect and conserve the region’s important resources.

Policy LU-5.7: Landscaping. Use landscaping for screening, solar control, parking lot shade, and other beautification purposes throughout the City.

Policy LU-5.8: Streetscapes. Promote drought tolerant landscaping, tree planting, and tree preservation along City streets as a means of improving aesthetics, making neighborhoods more pedestrian-friendly, and providing environmental and economic benefits.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.

Policy RM-1.2: Scenic Resources. Encourage the preservation of San Jacinto’s scenic resources, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms, to the extent practical.

Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize regional open space.

Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.

Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 6 of 266 ends

eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.

Action RM-1h: Identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.

Policy RM-3.5: Public Art. Promote the use of public art that celebrates the diverse and culturally rich history of San Jacinto at key gateways, major projects, and public gathering places.

Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and enhance the visual character of the community.

2. Scenic Resources
Threshold: Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-2, page 5.1-11 through 5.1- 14)
Explanation: There are no officially designated State Scenic Highways that traverse San Jacinto. Although the General Plan Update does not propose any changes to the County’s designated scenic highways, future development could occur adjacent to County eligible scenic highways. Future development would be subject to conformance with applicable San Jacinto Municipal Code requirements and be guided by relevant General Plan Update policies, including Policy LU-3.1, which ensures the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding area. Policy LU-5.3 identifies and preserves the significant features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects.

Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated system of open space that reflects aesthetics and community identity considerations. Policy RM-1.2 preserves scenic resources in San Jacinto, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms.

Policy RM-1.5 requires orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance. Action RM1e retains the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides. Action RM-1h directs the City to identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 7 of 266 ends

Special attention would be given to all development proposals that could affect views of, or otherwise alter, ridgelines. Pursuant to SJDC Chapter

17.630, all development located on hillsides having a natural slope gradient of 15 percent or greater is subject to Municipal Code Chapter 15.28, Hillside Development, which regulates development of hillside areas by relating the number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings to the topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through extensive cut and fill. Historic buildings would be preserved as required by federal, State, and local policies, including SJDC Chapter 17.510, which provides guidelines to assist in the identification and preservation of historic and cultural resources within the City. General Plan Update policies provide additional protections for historic buildings, including Policy RM-3.1 which protects areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources. Policy RM-3.6 identifies, designates, and protects buildings, districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto. Action RM-3a ensures that the City would continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3b requires that for structures that potentially have historic significance, a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Action RM-3o directs the City to conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

Future development within the City’s SOI that is under the County’s land use control would be subject to the County’s entitlement requirements, regulations, and design review process. The General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions described above and the SJDC are intended to ensure that development within the Study Area would not result in substantial damage to scenic resources. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would not significantly impact scenic resources within a State scenic highway and impacts would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 8 of 266 ends

Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Policy LU-5.3: Site Planning. Identify and preserve, as feasible, the significant features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects.

Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that respect and conserve the region’s important resources.

Policy LU-5.7: Landscaping. Use landscaping for screening, solar control, parking lot shade, and other beautification purposes throughout the City.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 9 of 266 ends

Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.

Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.

Action RM-1h: Identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.

Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code.

Policy RM-3.5: Public Art. Promote the use of public art that celebrates the diverse and culturally rich history of San Jacinto at key gateways, major projects, and public gathering places.

Policy RM-3.6: Historic Preservation. Identify, designate, and protect buildings, districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto.

Action RM-3b: For structures that potentially have historic significance, the City shall require that a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The City may require modification of the project and/or mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to City of San Jacinto guidelines or relocating the historic building as feasible.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 10 of 266 ends

Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

3. Visual Character
Threshold: In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public view of the site and its surroundings? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-3, pages 5.1-15 through 5.1- 18)
Explanation: All construction activities related to the General Plan Update would be temporary in nature and all construction equipment would ultimately be removed from individual project sites following completion of construction activities. Therefore, changes to local visual character and quality associated with construction of future development would be temporary, and impacts would be less than significant.

The General Plan Update would support additional development beyond existing conditions. In general, the General Plan Update Land Use Element proposes an increase in building density and intensity, in accordance with State and regional housing and climate change goals. The General Plan Update incorporates consistent and compatible development intensities that would maintain and enhance the overall visual character/quality of the Study Area. Specifically, the Land Use Element includes goals and policies, maps, and diagrams to control and direct the general distribution, location, and extent of land uses within the Study Area. For example, Policy LU-3.1 ensures the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding area. Policy LU-5.3 identifies and preserves the significant features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects. Policy RM-1.2 preserves scenic resources in San Jacinto, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms. Policy RM-1.5 requires orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance. Action RM-1h directs the City to identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas. Future growth would largely occur in areas that are already

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 11 of 266 ends

developed, as described above. Additionally, the General Plan Update would maintain existing designated Open Space areas in the San Jacinto Mountain foothills to the northeast and Lakeview Mountains to the west.

Policy LU 2.2 would encourage new development to occur in infill locations in a pattern that preserves open space. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated system of open space that reflects aesthetics and community identity considerations. Action RM-1e retains the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides. Guiding future growth and development based on the General Plan Update would ensure future development complements and protects the quality of the existing environment.

All future development would also be subject to conformance with applicable SJDC requirements. SJDC Article 2, Zones, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards, would regulate maximum building height, building setbacks, parking and garage/carport placement, landscaping and screening requirements, and other development characteristics in place in each zoning district to protect the City’s longterm visual character. Pursuant to SJDC Chapter 17.630, future development projects would be subject to project-specific design review to ensure compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed structures with public areas, and consistency with design guidelines/standards, the General Plan, or any other applicable specific plan (refer to Impact AES-2).

Pursuant to SJDC Section 17.600.090, Environmental Review, future land use and development review applications would undergo environmental review on a project-by-project basis prior to consideration by the decisionmaking authority. If necessary, mitigation would be recommended to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

The implementation of policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update and compliance with the SJDC would ensure that new development in the Study Area would be designed to enhance the visual quality of the area and be visually compatible with existing development and open space resources. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views or conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 12 of 266 ends

Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that respect and conserve the region’s important resources.

Policy LU-5.7: Landscaping. Use landscaping for screening, solar control, parking lot shade, and other beautification purposes throughout the City.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 13 of 266 ends

recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.

Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.

Action RM-1h: Identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.

Policy RM-3.5: Public Art. Promote the use of public art that celebrates the diverse and culturally rich history of San Jacinto at key gateways, major projects, and public gathering places.

4. Light and Glare
Threshold: Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-4, pages 5.1-19) Explanation: Future development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update could introduce new sources of light or glare with the potential to adversely affect day or nighttime views. Light and glare impacts could result from new light sources such as street lighting, interior and exterior building lighting (including for safety purposes), vehicle headlights, illuminated signage, traffic signals, and new glare sources such as reflective building materials, roofing materials, and windows. All lighting installed in future development projects as a result of the implementation of the General Plan Update would be subject to conformance with applicable SJDC

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 14 of 266 ends

requirements and guided by General Plan Update Land Use Element Action LU-3c, which would ensure sensitive receptors are protected from the intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances through the development review process. Pursuant to SJDC Section

17.300.080, Outdoor Light and Glare, all exterior lighting would be shielded or modified, and located so as to eliminate spillover illumination or glare beyond the property line or upward into the sky. SJDC Section

17.300.080 would also ensure lighting fixtures used to illuminate an outdoor advertising display be directed downward. Further, SJDC Section

17.330.080, Parking Design and Development Standards, provides a maximum height limit of 25 feet tall for parking lot light standards and ensures illumination of parking lots does not exceed one-half foot-candle along lot lines of a project. Pursuant to SJDC Section 17.600.090, all future land use and development review applications would undergo environmental review on a project-by-project basis prior to consideration by the decision-making authority. If necessary, mitigation would be recommended to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in adverse light and glare impacts. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health risks.

B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES

1. Forestland Zoning and Loss of Forest Land
Threshold: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g), or result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Finding: No Impact. (Draft EIR, page 5.2-7)
Explanation: There are no forest lands or timber lands located within the Study Area.

There are also no parcels that are currently zoned as forest land, timber, or timber production. Therefore, implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would have no impact on forest land, timber, or timber production.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 15 of 266 ends

C. AIR QUALITY

1. Air Quality Plans
Threshold: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-1, pages 5.3-27 through 5.3- 32)
Explanation: The Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has adopted a series of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to lead the Air Basin into compliance with several criteria air pollutant standards and other federal requirements, while taking into account construction and operational emissions associated with population and economic growth projections provided by the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG’s) 2020 RTP/SCS. CEQA requires that general plans be evaluated for consistency with the AQMP. Indicators of consistency include control strategies and growth projections.

Construction Emissions
Future development of individual projects under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with CARB’s requirements to minimize shortterm emissions from on-road and off-road diesel equipment, including the ATCM to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling to no more than five minutes at any given time, and with SCAQMD’s regulations such as Rule 403 for controlling fugitive dust and Rule 1113 for controlling VOC emissions from architectural coatings. Furthermore, as applicable to the type of growth, individual projects under the proposed General Plan Update would comply with fleet rules to reduce on-road truck emissions (i.e., 13 CCR, Section 2025 (CARB Truck and Bus regulation)). Compliance with these measures and requirements would be consistent with and meet or exceed the AQMP requirements for control strategies intended to reduce emissions from construction equipment and activities. Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in an increase in short-term employment compared to existing conditions. However, these jobs would be temporary in nature. Therefore, the construction jobs generated by future development accommodated by the General Plan Update would not conflict with the long-term employment or population projections upon which the AQMPs are based.

Operational Emissions
Future development under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with CARB motor vehicle standards, SCAQMD regulations for stationary sources and architectural coatings, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and, to the extent applicable, the 2020 RTP/SCS. Additionally,

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 16 of 266 ends

the location, design, and land uses of the growth anticipated by the General Plan Update would implement land use and transportation strategies related to reducing vehicle trips for residents and employees of the City by increasing commercial and residential density near public transit with the new land use designations such as Downtown Village and Mixed-Use. The availability of public transportation and the focus on increasing density relative to the existing public transportation, enables implementation of the General Plan Update to potentially reduce vehicle trips, VMT, and associated transportation-related emissions per capita, compared to the existing conditions. Future development in the City of San Jacinto that is consistent with the General Plan Update would increase vehicle trips and VMT that would result in emissions of ozone precursors and particulate matter. Individual projects under the General Plan Update would be required to undergo subsequent environmental review pursuant to CEQA, and would be required to demonstrate compliance with the AQMP.

The City of San Jacinto continues to coordinate with SCAQMD and SCAG to ensure Citywide growth projections, land use planning efforts, and local development patterns are accounted for in the regional planning and air quality planning processes. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to further minimize potential impacts to air quality in support of the AQMP. Goal RM-4 of the General Plan Update Resources Management Element addresses potential air quality impacts by supporting projects, programs, policies and regulations that reduce impacts to air quality by private and public construction projects. Also, Policy LU-1.1 of the General Plan Update Land Use Element promotes a land use pattern that would reduce pollution and air quality impacts. Therefore, the operation of the proposed General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan and impacts would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-4: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Improved air quality in San Jacinto and the region through reductions in air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG emissions).

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 17 of 266 ends

Policy RM-4.1: Regional Cooperation. Support regional efforts, including those organized through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement the regional Air Quality Management Plan.

Policy RM-4.2: Measurement and Enforcement. Coordinate with the California Air Resources Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District to properly measure air quality at emission sources and enforce the standards of the Clean Air Act.

Policy RM-4.4: Transportation Options. Promote alternative modes of transportation to reduce vehicular emissions and improve air quality. (See Mobility Element) Policy RM-4.5: Walkability. Encourage pedestrian-scale development and pedestrianfriendly design features to reduce vehicle emissions. (See Mobility Element) Policy RM-4.6: Sustainable Development. Encourage and incentivize higher density and mixed-use development opportunities within designated areas of the City to lessen the impacts of traffic congestion on local air quality. (See Land Use Element) Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.

Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.

Policy RM-4.8: Public Engagement. Promote regional air quality programs in order to inform the public on regional air quality concerns and encourage the engagement of all San Jacinto residents in future planning decisions related to air quality.

Action RM-4b: Review all new industrial and commercial development projects for potential air quality impacts to residences and other sensitive receptors. Ensure that mitigation measures and best management practices are implemented to reduce significant emissions of criteria pollutants.

Action RM-4c: Review development, infrastructure, and planning projects for consistency with SCAQMD requirements during the CEQA review process. Require project applicants to prepare air quality analyses to address SCAQMD and General Plan requirements, which include analysis and identification of:

1. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project during construction, project operation, and cumulative conditions.

2. Potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants.

3. Significant air quality impacts associated with the project for construction, project operation, and cumulative conditions.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 18 of 266 ends

4. Mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less than significant or the maximum extent feasible where impacts cannot be mitigated to less than significant.

Action RM-4d: Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement programs aimed at improving regional air quality.

Action RM-4n: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD construction emission thresholds.

Where emissions from individual projects exceed SCAQMD thresholds, the following actions shall be incorporated as necessary to minimize impacts. These measures do not exclude the use of other, equally effective mitigation measures.  Require all off-road diesel equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) used for this Project to meet USEPA Tier 4 final off-road emission standards or equivalent. Such equipment shall be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a California Air Resources Board Certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) or equivalent. The DPF reduces diesel particulate matter and NOx emissions during construction activities.
 Require a minimum of 50 percent of construction debris be diverted for recycling.  Require building materials to contain a minimum 10 percent recycled content.  Require materials such as paints, primers, sealants, coatings, and glues to have a low volatile organic compound concentration compared to conventional products.

If low VOC materials are not available, architectural coating phasing should be extended sufficiently to reduce the daily emissions of VOCs.

Action RM-4o: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD’s operational emission thresholds. For projects where operational emissions exceed regulatory thresholds, the following measures may be used to reduce impacts. Note the following measures are not all inclusive and developers have the option to add or substitute measures that are equally or more appropriate for the scope of the project.
 Develop a project specific TDM program for residents and/or employees that provides opportunities for carpool/vanpools.
 Provide onsite solar/renewable energy in excess of regulatory requirements.  Require that owners/tenants of non-residential or multi-family residential developments use architectural coatings that are 10 grams per liter or less when repainting/repairing properties.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 19 of 266 ends

 Require dripless irrigation and irrigation sensor units that prevent watering during rain storms.
 Ensure all parking areas are wired for capability of future EV charging and include EV charging stations that exceed regulatory requirements.

2. Other Adverse Emissions
Threshold: Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-4, pages 5.3-41 through 5.3- 42)
Explanation: According to the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, construction equipment is not a typical source of odors. Odors from the combustion of diesel fuel would be minimized by complying with the CARB ATCM that limits diesel-fueled commercial vehicle idling to five minutes at any given location, which was adopted in 2004. Future development accommodated by the General Plan Update would also comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 (Nuisance), which prohibits the emissions of nuisance air contaminants or odorous compounds. Through adherence with mandatory compliance with SCAQMD Rules and State measures, construction activities and materials would not create objectionable odors. Construction of future development would not be expected to generate nuisance odors at nearby air quality sensitive receptors. Therefore, impacts with respect to odors would be less than significant.

According to the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding.

Compliance with the City’s Municipal Code, including Section 6.24.040 which prohibits animal premises from being a source of offensive odors, and SCAQMD’s Rule 402 (Nuisance), which prohibits the emissions of nuisance air contaminants or odorous compounds would reduce potential impacts. The other potential source of odors would be new waste receptacles within the Study Area. The receptacles would be stored in areas and in containers, as required by the City (Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, Garbage Collection and Disposal), and be emptied on a regular basis, before potentially substantial odors have developed. Additionally, the policies included as part of the General Plan Update would reduce mobile and stationary source emissions and odors associated with diesel fuel by focusing on land use patterns that improve air quality, reduce air pollution from stationary sources, and encourage/enable increased transit behavior.

Consequently, implementation of the General Plan Update would not create operational-related objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 20 of 266 ends

people within the City. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

1. Wetlands
Threshold: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-3, pages 5.4-32 through 5.4- 35)
Explanation: The General Plan Update is a planning document that enables additional development but does not include any specific development proposals; therefore, adoption of the General Plan Update would not directly impact the environment. However, the Project could have an indirect change on the physical environment through subsequently approved projects that are consistent with the buildout under the General Plan Update. the General Plan Resource Management Element includes policies and actions intended to protect sensitive natural communities, including wetlands, from adverse effects associated with future development and improvement projects within the Study Area. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated open space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.

Policy RM-1.3 preserves and enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinating the City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize regional open space. Policy RM-1.6 would conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. Action RM-1d directs the City to cooperate with the County to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape.

During the review of development proposals, the City would use the MSHCP to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 21 of 266 ends

applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. Further, Action RM-1i addresses potential resources outside of the MSHCP area, including the requirement to identify the presence of state or federal regulated wetlands or waters and to ensure compliance with the applicable requirements of the regulatory agencies and application of any mitigation determined through the agency permitting process. Policy RM-2.4 encourages development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible. Action RM-2b directs the City to cooperate with the RWQCB to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream. Compliance with federal, State, and local regulations, and implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions, and implementation would reduce potential impacts to wetlands to a less than significant level.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural resources.

Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.

Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource agency requirements.

Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate.

Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 22 of 266 ends

and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources.

Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate.

Action RM-1i: During the development review process, require Applicants of developments with the potential to reduce or eliminate habitat for native plant and wildlife species or sensitive habitats not covered by the MSHCP, as determined by the City of San Jacinto’s Community Development Department, to prepare a site-specific general biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources, including any sensitive plant or wildlife species. The report shall identify the need for focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated wetlands or waters. Required surveys shall be conducted by qualified biologists and/or botanists in accordance with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and/or United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) survey protocols for target species. If no sensitive species are observed during the field survey then no further mitigation will be required. If sensitive species or habitats, including wetlands are documented on the project site, the project applicant shall comply with the applicable requirements of the regulatory agencies and shall apply mitigation determined through the agency permitting process.

Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible.

Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.

Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream.

2. Wildlife Movement
Threshold: Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 23 of 266 ends

Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-4, pages 5.4-35 through 5.4- 38)
Explanation: Future development under the General Plan Update could result in creation of new barriers to animal movement in the urbanizing portions of the City; however, impacts to wildlife movement would be mitigated through the establishment of corridors and linkages established by compliance with the Western Riverside MSHCP. In accordance with SJDC Section 17.520.030, development projects would be required to comply with the applicable terms in the MSHCP, including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Additionally, applicants for a discretionary permit for property located in Criteria Area/Criteria Cell(s) as designated in Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan must submit a Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) application to the Riverside County Environmental Programs Department and subsequently to the Western Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) for Joint Project Review (JPR). Compliance with the SJDC would prevent substantial interference with wildlife movement and corridors.

In compliance with the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, the Western Riverside County MSHCP is required by federal and State permitting authorities to provide for the movement of species, protect wildlife corridors and facilitate genetic flow. The MSHCP protects native wildlife nursery sites by conserving large blocks of representative native habitats suitable for supporting species’ lifecycle requirements and the essential ecological processes of species which depend on such habitats.

The EIR/EIS for the MSHCP concluded that the Plan provides for the movement of species through established wildlife corridors and protects the use of native wildlife nursery sites; therefore, compliance with the conservation requirements for the Cores, Linkages, and Habitat Blocks in the Study Area would ensure wildlife nursery sites are not adversely impacted. In addition, the General Plan Resource Management Element includes policies and actions intended to preserve ecological and biological resources. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated open space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity. Policy RM1.3 preserves and enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize regional open space. Policy RM-1.6 would conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 24 of 266 ends

native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. Action RM-1d directs the City to cooperate with the County to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape.

During the review of development proposals, the City would use the MSHCP (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. Further, Action RM-1j requires vegetation and tree removal that would occur during the bird nesting season would be required to conduct surveys to determine whether active bird nests are observed within the site or vicinity. If active nests are identified, buffers would be required to be implemented and compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) would be required. Thus, through the protections afforded by the MSHCP, the MBTA, and General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, future development under the General Plan Update would have a less than significant impact associated with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or the use of native wildlife nursery sites.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural resources.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 25 of 266 ends

Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate.

Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources.

Action RM-1j: Where feasible, vegetation and tree removal should occur outside of the bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31). If not feasible, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than three days prior to the commencement of construction activities. The biologist conducting the clearance survey shall document the negative results if no active bird nests are observed on the project site or within the vicinity during the clearance survey with a brief letter report, submitted to the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department prior to construction, indicating that no impacts to active bird nests would occur before construction can proceed.

If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities shall stay outside a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For listed and raptor species, this buffer shall be 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure the nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activity, pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Prior to the commencement of construction activities and the issuance of any permits, results of the pre-construction survey and any subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and other appropriate agencies.

3. Local Policies and Ordinances
Threshold: Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-5, page 5.4-38 through 5.4- 40)

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 26 of 266 ends

Explanation: Future development under the General Plan Update would be subject to all applicable federal, State, regional, and local policies and regulations related to the protection of biological resources. The City does not have a tree preservation policy or ordinance; however, San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 12.20 addresses the City’s tree planting and street improvement plan and requires authorization for the removal of trees in public parks, public grounds, public streets or parking places in the City. In addition, the General Plan Resource Management Element includes policies and actions intended to protect biological resources. Policy RM-1.3 preserves and enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize regional open space. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. During the review of development proposals, the City would use the MSHCP (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. Future development projects would be assessed for consistency with the San Jacinto Municipal Code and General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions. Thus, the General Plan Update would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and impacts would be less than significant tin this regard.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural resources.

Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 27 of 266 ends

communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource agency requirements.

Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate.

4. Habitat Conservation Plans
Threshold: Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-6, pages 5.4-40 through 5.4- 42)
Explanation: There are two Habitat Conservation Plans/Natural Community Conservation Plans within the Study Area: the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan and the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP).

The northeastern portion of the Study Area, within the City of San Jacinto’s SOI, lies within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Area. The portion of the

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 28 of 266 ends

Study Area within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Area is located within unincorporated Riverside County. The General Plan Update designates the area within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Area as Open Space. The General Plan Update is in conformance with the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan, as evidenced by the area remaining as Open Space in the Potrero ACEC Reserve area, as designated by the Habitat Conservation Plan.

The Study Area lies within the Western Riverside County MSHCP. The General Plan Update has been designed to direct future development and redevelopment to areas that are already developed or designated for development, and would maintain 6,189 acres of existing Open Space areas in the San Jacinto Mountain foothills in the northeast and Lakeview Mountains in the western portion of the Study Area. Focusing development and redevelopment within areas that consist primarily of developed and/or disturbed land would minimize conflicts with the MSHCP. However, future development and redevelopment may include future projects within MSHCP Conserved Lands, Criteria Cells, and Public/Quasi Public Lands.

Such future development would be required to undergo project-specific environmental and design review to determine whether the project would be consistent with the MSHCP. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions that would maintain, protect, and preserve biologically significant habitats where practical, which would serve to maintain consistency with the MSHCP. Policy RM-1.3 preserves and enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize regional open space. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. Action RM-1d directs City to cooperate with the County to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, the City would use the MSHCP (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements.

Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. As such, implementation

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 29 of 266 ends

of the General Plan Update would not conflict with the provisions of the Western Riverside County MSHCP, Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan and impacts would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural resources.

Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 30 of 266 ends

E. CULTURAL RESOURCES

1. Historical Resources
Threshold: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, § 15064.5? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact CUL-1, pages 5.5-24 through 5.5- 26)
Explanation: There are 152 recorded historic built environment resources throughout the Study Area. These historic resources are scattered throughout the Study Area and vary in terms of type, architectural style, condition, and alteration history. While the General Plan Update does not directly propose any changes to any historic resources, future development allowed under the General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of known historical resources or unknown historical resources which have not yet been identified. The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions addressing heritage resources, including historical resources. Policy RM-3.1 protects areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code. Policy RM3.6 identifies, designates, and protects buildings, districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto. Policy RM-3.7 identifies funding programs to assist private property owners in the preservation of historic resources. Action RM-3a ensures the City would continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3b requires that, for structures that potentially have historic significance, a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The City may require modification of the project and/or mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to City guidelines or relocating the historic building as feasible. Action RM3m directs the City to develop and implement architectural standards and historical preservation guidelines for development and redevelopment in the Downtown Village area of the community. Action RM-3n directs the City to develop and implement programs and/or incentives to private property owners to help preserve, restore, or reuse historic structures while enhancing their historical significance and integrity. Action RM-3o directs the City to conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 31 of 266 ends

Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. Per SJDC Chapter 17.510, potential historic resources may be considered for a Historic Resource designation by the City, and would require a permit to restore, rehabilitate, alter, develop, construct, demolish, remove, or change the appearance of. Further, for structures that potentially have historical significance, the City would require preparation of a study by a qualified professional archaeologist or historian to determine the significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in compliance with CEQA. Therefore, compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations, would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource and impacts would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich culture and historic assets.

Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code.

Policy RM-3.2: Cultural Reminders. Seek to incorporate reminders of San Jacinto’s culture in the built and natural environment through adaptive reuse, signage, markers, and other reminders of San Jacinto’s heritage.

Policy RM-3.3: Public Education. Educate and actively involve the public in preserving cultural assets, including techniques, incentives, and legal requirements for preservation.

Policy RM-3.6: Historic Preservation. Identify, designate, and protect buildings, districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto.

Policy RM-3.7: Funding. Identify funding programs to assist private property owners in the preservation of historic resources.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 32 of 266 ends

Action RM-3k: Promote public awareness and encourage tourism in the City by actively identifying and enhancing the community’s historic resources through the location of historic landmark plaques and a Historic Tour Guide. Promote tours of these sites on the City’s and other organization’s websites.

Action RM-3l: Continue to support the improvement and enhancement of the Estudillo Mansion and expand opportunities for public access and use of the historic treasure.

Action RM-3m: Develop and implement architectural standards and historical preservation guidelines for development and redevelopment in the Downtown Village area of the community. Use housing and façade rehabilitation programs to support development and redevelopment activities that preserve and complement historic structures and resources in the downtown.

Action RM-3n: Develop and implement programs and/or incentives to private property owners to help preserve, restore, or reuse historic structures while enhancing their historical significance and integrity.

Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

2. Archeological Resources
Threshold: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact CUL-2, pages 5.5-26 through 5.5- 28)
Explanation: The EIC record search identified a total of 80 archaeological resources within the Study Area, including 49 prehistoric archaeological sites, seven prehistoric isolates, three multicomponent sites, 20 historic archaeological sites, and one historic isolate. Effects on archaeological resources deemed to be significant could be considered adverse if they involve physical demolition, destruction, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of a resource would be materially impaired. While the General Plan Update does not directly propose sitespecific development with the potential to directly impact archaeological

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 33 of 266 ends

resources, future development allowed under the General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of known or unknown archaeological resources.

The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions addressing heritage resources, including archaeological resources. Policy RM-3.1 protects areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code. Action RM-3a ensures the City would continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3c requires, for all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain prehistoric/historic resources, a study to be conducted by a professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts. Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery. Action RM-3f directs the City to make provisions for archeological resources accidentally discovered during construction for projects where the City has approval authority over the project. These provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and contingency funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery of the archeological resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the resource if the archeological resource is determined to be unique. Action RM-3o directs the City to conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

Archaeological resources are protected under federal, State, and local regulations and implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce potential adverse impacts to archaeological resources associated with future development. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. SJDC Chapter 17.500 is intended to protect archaeological resources and requires a resource assessment be conducted with specific areas having been identified as having the potential for archaeological resources. SJDC Chapter 17.500 establishes the procedures for the resource assessment, including the potential for a resource to be impacted and requirements if significant impacts are identified. Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource and impacts would be less than significant.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 34 of 266 ends

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich culture and historic assets.

Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code.

Policy RM-3.3: Public Education. Educate and actively involve the public in preserving cultural assets, including techniques, incentives, and legal requirements for preservation.

Action RM-3c: For all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain prehistoric/historic resources, the City shall require a study to be conducted by a professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts.

Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.

Action RM-3f: The City shall make provisions for archeological resources accidentally discovered during construction for projects where the City has approval authority over the project. These provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and contingency funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery of the archeological resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the resource if the archeological resource is determined to be unique.

Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

3. Human Remains
Threshold: Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact CUL-3, pages 5.5-28 through 5.5- 30)
Explanation: Future construction projects within the Study Area could have the potential to disturb or destroy buried Native American human remains as well as other human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 35 of 266 ends

As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable State and local regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes actions addressing the potential discovery of human remains. Action RM-3a directs the City to continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3d establishes that, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98, or the Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being granted access to the site. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. SJDC Chapter 17.500 is intended to protect archaeological resources and addresses the potential for inadvertent discovery of human remains consistent with Public Resources Code 5097.98 Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations, including Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), and PRC Section 5097.98, would ensure that potential impacts associated with the inadvertent discovery of human remains would be reduced to less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich culture and historic assets.

Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 36 of 266 ends

Action RM-3d: For projects that involve ground disturbing activities on native soil, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall enter a Treatment and Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and disposition of archaeological/cultural resources and human remains associated with Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during construction of the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors.

Following execution of the TDA by the developer and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, the TDA will be incorporated by reference into the grading permit.

Action RM-3g: In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98, or the Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being granted access to the site.

F. ENERGY

1. Energy
Threshold: Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation, or conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact EN-1 pages 5.6-8 through 5.6-14) Explanation: Buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel), and from off-road construction activities (e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2040 buildout of the General Plan Update.

Each of these activities would require the use of energy resources.

Developers of individual projects within the Study Area would be responsible for conserving energy, to the extent feasible, and would rely heavily on reducing per capita energy consumption to achieve this goal, including through Statewide and local measures. Buildout of the General

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 37 of 266 ends

Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations regulating energy usage. The General Plan Update would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing energy use or increasing the use of renewable energy.

This is a less than significant impact in this regard.

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to support energy conservation and renewable energy, as well as reducing energy use. Policy MR-5.2 ensures compliance with all State requirements regarding generation of power and encourages energy providers to investigate the use or expansion of renewable sources of energy. Policy RM-5.3 promotes the development and use of renewable energy resources to reduce dependency on fossil fuels. Policy RM-5.4 promotes the use of energy-efficient materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure. Policy RM-5.5 promotes energy conservation and recycling by the public and private sectors. Policy RM-5.8 promotes public education programs that advocate for reducing energy consumption, and promote renewable sources of energy. Action RM-5b implements energy conservation measures in public buildings by promoting energy efficient buildings and site design for all new public buildings during the site development permit process, as well as installing energy saving devices in new public buildings and retrofitting existing public buildings. Action RM5c uses the development review process to encourage innovative building design, layout, and orientation techniques to minimize energy use by taking advantage of sun/shade patterns, prevailing winds, landscaping and building materials that control energy usage, and solar design. Action RM-5e continues to review development projects to ensure that all new public and private development complies with the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 standards as well as the energy efficiency standards established by the General Plan and the Municipal Code. Action RM-5f promotes the CEC Building Energy Benchmarking Program on the City’s website to help benchmark and monitor energy use for participating businesses seeking to increase energy efficiency and realize cost savings. Action RM-5g encourages new development projects to install electrified space (HVAC) and water heating systems in lieu of natural gas systems, above and beyond the requirements of Title 24, before and during the building plan check process. Furthermore, connections exist between the Study Area and nearby pedestrian and bicycle pathways, and public transit access exists nearby, reducing the need for local motor vehicle travel. Although improvements to the City’s pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit systems would provide further opportunities for alternative transit, the Study Area would be linked closely with existing networks that, in large part, are sufficient for most residents of the Study Area and neighboring communities.

As a result, the General Plan Update would not result in any significant adverse impacts related to Project energy requirements, energy use

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 38 of 266 ends

inefficiencies, and/or the energy intensiveness of materials by amount and fuel type for during General Plan Update buildout, including during construction, operations, maintenance, and/or removal. The City of San Jacinto would comply with all existing energy standards and would not result in significant adverse impacts on energy resources. Buildout of the General Plan Update would not be expected cause an inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources nor conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. This is a less than significant impact.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-5: Energy and Mineral Resources. A community that safely manages its energy and mineral resources
Policy RM-5.1: San Jacinto Power. Continue to make clean, modern, and cost-effective energy options available to individuals who live and work in San Jacinto.

Policy RM-5.2: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with all state requirements regarding the generation of power and encourage energy providers to investigate the use or expansion of renewable sources of energy.

Policy RM-5.3: Renewable Energy. Promote the development and use of renewable energy resources to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.

Policy RM-5.4: Energy-Efficient Materials. Promote the use of energy-efficient materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure.

Policy RM-5.5: Energy Conservation. Promote energy conservation and recycling by the public and private sectors.

Policy RM-5.6: Energy Needs. Collaborate with local service providers in determining and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean, modern, and cost-effective ways.

Policy RM-5.7: Business Community. Support the decisions of the San Jacinto business community as they select and implement the most appropriate, financially feasible, and responsible energy source for their individual operations.

Policy RM-5.8: Public Education. Promote public education programs that advocate for reducing energy consumption, and promote renewable sources of energy.

Policy RM-5.9: Promote Energy Conservation in Existing Building Stock. Promote energy conservation by residents and businesses in existing structures, in close coordination with other agencies and local energy providers, including the SCAQMD and Southern California Edison.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 39 of 266 ends

Action RM-5a: Continue to implement the City’s Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program; evaluate the effectiveness of the program every five years to identify programmatic changes necessary to continue meeting the City’s objectives.

Action RM-5b: Implement energy conservation measures in public buildings through the following actions:
 Promote energy efficient buildings and site design for all new public buildings during the site development permit process; and
 Install energy saving devices in new public buildings and retrofit existing public buildings.

Action RM-5c: During the development review process, encourage innovative building design, layout, and orientation techniques to minimize energy use by taking advantage of sun/shade patterns, prevailing winds, landscaping and building materials that control energy usage, and solar design.

Action RM-5d: Promote retrofit programs by the City to reduce energy usage and consequently reduce emissions from energy consumption. Encourage utility companies to provide informational literature about available retrofit programs at public facilities such as City Hall, the Community Center , and libraries.

Action RM-5e: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new public and private development complies with the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 standards as well as the energy efficiency standards established by the General Plan and the Municipal Code.

Action RM-5f: Promote the CEC Building Energy Benchmarking Program (AB 802) on the City’s website to help benchmark and monitor energy use for participating businesses seeking to increase energy efficiency and realize cost savings.

Action RM-5g: Encourage new development projects to install electrified space (HVAC) and water heating systems in lieu of natural gas systems, above and beyond the requirements of Title 24, before and during the building plan check process.

Action RM-5h: During the development review process, require that all new developments adjacent to or near natural gas lines, coordinate with So Cal Gas to install and connect to the lines, as feasible.

Action RM-5i: Advertise the San Jacinto Power PureGreen program and encourage San Jacinto Power customers to enroll in the program and opt-up to 100 percent renewable energy content.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 40 of 266 ends

G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

1. Seismic Hazards
Threshold: Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, or landslides?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-1 pages 5.7-20 through 5.7- 23)
Explanation: The Study Area is situated within a seismically active region, specifically within the San Jacinto fault zone. The Alquist-Priolo fault zone runs two parallel tracks through the City; one fault runs through the western portion of the City, and one fault runs through the Sphere of Influence in the eastern portion of the Study Area. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo fault zone would be required to comply with regulatory requirements of the State of California Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, which requires any proposed development to prepare a geologic report to address the potential for surface fault displacement within the Project site. Future development projects would be required to comply with the provisions of the California Building Standards Code (CBSC), which requires development projects to: perform geotechnical investigations in accordance with State law, engineer improvements to address potential seismic and ground failure issues, and use earthquake-resistant construction techniques to address potential earthquake loads when constructing buildings and improvements. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the CBSC, General Plan, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. In addition to the requirements associated with the CBSC and the Municipal Code, the General Plan includes policies and actions in both the Public Safety Element and Resource Management Element to address potential impacts associated with seismic activity. For example, Policy PS-1 requires the maintenance of the City’s geologic and seismic hazards map (Figure PS-1 in the Public Safety Element). Policy PS

1.2 requires the enforcement of the State’s seismic design guidelines and all relevant building codes in order to reduce the risk of damage associated with seismic activity. Policy PS-1.5 requires the assessment and mitigation of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards. The Resource Management Element includes Action RM-1g, to ensure proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented during the development review process.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 41 of 266 ends

Development projects are reviewed to address seismic safety issues and would be required to provide adequate mitigation for existing and potential hazards identified. With the implementation of the policies and actions in the General Plan, as well as applicable State and City codes, potential impacts associated with a seismic event, including rupture of an earthquake fault, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards: A community that is adequately prepared for natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.

Policy PS-1.1: Geologic Hazard Identification. Maintain the City’s geologic and seismic hazards map (Figure PS-1) in concert with updates from the California Geologic Survey and local surveys, and update as appropriate.

Policy PS-1.2: Earthquake Protection. Enforce State seismic design guidelines and all relevant building codes to reduce the risk of damage associated with seismic activity.

Policy PS-1.3: Fault Zones. Encourage landscaped open space uses for areas within identified fault zones and limit the development of new sensitive uses in these areas.

Policy PS-1.4: Liquefaction. Require site-specific studies in areas subject to liquefaction to determine the nature and extent of potential liquefaction and to identify engineering and development siting measures to permit development to occur safely.

Policy PS-1.6: Impact Reduction. Reduce the risk of impacts from geologic and seismic hazards by applying proper and up to date land use planning, development engineering, building construction, and retrofitting requirements.

Action PS-1a: Review development proposals to ensure compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 19100 et seq. (Earthquake Protection Law), which requires that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by natural forces such as earthquakes and wind.

Action PS-1b: Update building, zoning, and grading codes as needed to ensure adopted standards mitigate potential seismic hazards and comply with the Alquist-Priolo Act and

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 42 of 266 ends

Unreinforced Masonry Law.

Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all identified significant public safety hazards.

Action PS-1e:Where the threat from natural hazards (such as fault rupture or flooding) cannot be mitigated, use open space easements and other regulatory techniques to prohibit development and avoid public safety hazards. Where feasible, permit the joint-use of preserve areas and easements such as seismic faults and drainage basins for open space and recreational uses.

Action PS-1f: To minimize damage from earthquakes and other geologic activity, adopt and implement the most recent State seismic requirements for structural design of new development and redevelopment.

Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals, require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the geologic survey.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1g: Where feasible, incorporate open space and passive recreational uses into areas identified to have significant hazards related to flooding, geologic conditions, and seismic events.

2. Soil Erosion
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-2, pages 5.7-23 through 5.67- 24)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update would provide for development and improvement projects that would involve some land clearing, mass grading, and other ground-disturbing activities that could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction.

Construction-related erosion could result in the loss of a substantial amount of nonrenewable topsoil and could adversely affect water quality in nearby surface waters. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the CBSC, General Plan, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other regulations. In compliance with NPDES Permit regulations, the State of

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 43 of 266 ends

California requires that any construction activity disturbing one acre or more of soil comply with the Construction General Permit. The permit requires development and implementation of a SWPPP and monitoring plan, which must include erosion-control and sediment-control BMPs that would meet or exceed measures required by the Construction General Permit to control stormwater quality degradation due to potential construction-related pollutants. The General Plan Update includes a range of policies and actions related to best management practices, NPDES requirements, and minimizing discharge of materials (including eroded soils) into the storm drain system in the proposed Public Safety Element and Resource Management Element. For example, Action PS-1g requires that during the review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals, licensed soil and geologic conditions surveys are required by the State, and when potential geologic impacts are identified, mitigation efforts are required. Action RM-1f ensures proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented. Action RM-2a requires new development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through implementation of BMPs. With the implementation of the policies and actions in the General Plan Update, as well as applicable State and City requirements, potential impacts associated with erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals, require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the geologic survey.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the survey.

Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 44 of 266 ends

implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8- 2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).

3. Unstable Soils
Threshold: Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Finding: Less than significant (Draft EIR, Impact GS-3, pages 5.7-24 through 5.7- 28)
Explanation: Future development anticipated by the General Plan Update could result in the exposure of people and structures to conditions that have the potential for adverse effects associated with ground instability or failure. Soils and geologic conditions in the Study Area have the potential for landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. The General Plan Update Land Use, Public Safety and Resource Management elements include policies and actions to address geologic conditions within the Study Area. For example, Policy LU-3.4 limits development in areas subject to severe natural hazards, such as landslides, ground subsidence, liquefaction, and flooding. Policy PS-1 requires the maintenance of the City’s geologic and seismic hazards map (Figure PS-1 in the Public Safety Element). Policy PS 1.2 requires the enforcement of the State’s seismic design guidelines and all relevant building codes in order to reduce the risk of damage associated with seismic activity. Policy PS-1.5 requires the assessment and mitigation of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards. The Resource Management Element includes Action RM-1g, to ensure proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented during the development review process. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City of San Jacinto, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the CBSC, the General Plan Update policies and actions, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Future development

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 45 of 266 ends

and improvement projects would be required to prepare site-specific geotechnical studies to identify geologic and soil conditions specific to the site and provide design recommendations consistent with the requirements of State and City codes. Implementation of CBSC and the Municipal Code requirements related to seismic and geologic conditions and the General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure that future development projects are evaluated for potential geologic and seismic risks and that potential risks are adequately addressed. With the implementation of the policies and actions in the General Plan Update, as well as applicable State and City codes, potential impacts associated with unstable geologic conditions with the potential to result in landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse would be reduced to less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU-3: Land Use Compatibility. A community that promotes high-quality development and compatibility with surrounding land uses and major transportation corridors.

Policy LU-3.4: Environmental Compatibility. Limit development in areas subject to severe natural hazards, such as landslides, ground subsidence, liquefaction, and flooding.

Action LU-3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards. A community that is adequately prepared for natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.

Policy PS-1.2: Earthquake Protection. Enforce State seismic design guidelines and all relevant building codes to reduce the risk of damage associated with seismic activity.

Policy PS-1.3: Fault Zones. Encourage landscaped open space uses for areas within identified fault zones and limit the development of new sensitive uses in these areas.

Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 46 of 266 ends

liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards.

Policy PS-1.7: Risk Inventories. Maintain an updated inventory of public buildings and infrastructure within the City of San Jacinto at risk of seismic and geologic hazard impacts and regularly evaluate potential mitigation projects to address risks, as financially feasible.

Action PS-1b: Update building, zoning, and grading codes as needed to ensure adopted standards mitigate potential seismic hazards and comply with the Alquist-Priolo Act and Unreinforced Masonry Law
Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all identified significant public safety hazards.

Action PS-1e: Where the threat from natural hazards (such as fault rupture or flooding) cannot be mitigated, use open space easements and other regulatory techniques to prohibit development and avoid public safety hazards. Where feasible, permit the joint-use of preserve areas and easements such as seismic faults and drainage basins for open space and recreational uses.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 47 of 266 ends

recommendations contained within the survey.

Action RM-1g: Where feasible, incorporate open space and passive recreational uses into areas identified to have significant hazards related to flooding, geologic conditions, and seismic events
Goal RM-2: Water Resources: A community that protects and conserves limited water resources
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8- 2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).

4. Expansive Soils
Threshold: Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Tables 18-1- D of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-4, pages 5.7-28 through 5.7- 31)
Explanation: The majority of the Study Area has low expansive soils, including most of the developed land. The areas with high expansive soils represent only a very small portion of the Study Area and would require special design considerations due to shrink-swell potentials. The Public Safety Element and Resource Management Element of the General Plan Update includes policies and actions that are designed to protect from geologic hazards, including expansive soils. Goal PS-1, Seismic and Geologic Hazards and Goal PS-3, Flood Hazards, contain policies and actions that limit potential hazards created by expansive soils. Further, the Resource Management Element goals, policies, and actions, pertaining to native vegetation and water resource conservation; healthy soil and vegetation and water sources help to prevent dangers originating from expansive soil situations. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the CBSC, General Plan policies and actions, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other applicable

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 48 of 266 ends

regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA.

As required by the CBSC, a site-specific geotechnical investigation would identify the potential for damage related to expansive soils and nonuniformly compacted fill and engineered fill. If a risk is identified, design criteria and specification options may include removal of the problematic soils, and replacement, as needed, with properly conditioned and compacted fill material that is designed to withstand the forces exerted during the expected shrink-swell cycles and settlements.

Design criteria and specifications set forth in the design-level geotechnical investigation would ensure impacts from problematic soils are minimized.

There are no additional significant adverse environmental impacts, apart from those disclosed in the relevant chapters of this Draft EIR, that are anticipated to occur associated with expansive soils. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards: A community that is adequately prepared for natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity Policy PS-1.1: Geologic Hazard Identification. Maintain the City’s geologic and seismic hazards map (Figure PS-1) in concert with updates from the California Geologic Survey and local surveys, and update as appropriate
Policy PS-1.3: Fault Zones. Encourage landscaped open space uses for areas within identified fault zones and limit the development of new sensitive uses in these areas Policy PS-1.4: Liquefaction. Require site-specific studies in areas subject to liquefaction to determine the nature and extent of potential liquefaction and to identify engineering and development siting measures to permit development to occur safely.

Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards Policy PS-1.6: Impact Reduction. Reduce the risk of impacts from geologic and seismic hazards by applying proper and up to date land use planning, development engineering, building construction, and retrofitting requirements.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 49 of 266 ends

Policy PS-1.8: Critical Facilities. Require new critical infrastructure and facilities that may be built in the City to incorporate site specific seismic structural design as required by applicable building codes
Action PS-1a: Review development proposals to ensure compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 19100 et seq. (Earthquake Protection Law), which requires that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by natural forces such as earthquakes and wind.

Action PS-1b: Update building, zoning, and grading codes as needed to ensure adopted standards mitigate potential seismic hazards and comply with the Alquist-Priolo Act and Unreinforced Masonry Law.

Goal PS-3: Flood Hazards. A community that is protected from flood hazards.

Policy PS-3.6: Building Codes. Adhere to the latest building, site, and design codes in the California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk of flooding hazards in the community.

Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.

Action PS-3b: Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4 permit.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 50 of 266 ends

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural resources
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where appropriate.

Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the survey.

Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water resources
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible.

Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or drainage detention.

5. Septic Tanks
Threshold: Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-5, pages 5.7-31 through 5.7- 33)
Explanation: The City of San Jacinto sewer system service area covers the vast majority of area within the City’s municipal boundaries. The areas within the Study Area from which the City does not collect wastewater are served either by septic systems, provided by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), or by the Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (LHMWD). Because of varying soil characteristics and depths to groundwater throughout the Study Area, some areas may have moderate to severe limitations on the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. To the extent that

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 51 of 266 ends

future development under the General Plan Update would occur in such areas, there is the potential for effects to soils that cannot adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. However, any individual project which would have a septic system would be required to comply with the CSBC, which requires development projects to perform geotechnical investigations in accordance with State law to determine that on-site soil conditions are suitable for a septic system. Additionally, future developments proposing a septic system must also comply with the RWQCB Basin Plan and the Riverside County Department of Health requirements. The Resource Management and Public Safety Elements of the General Plan Update include Action RM-1f, and Action PS-1g, which ensure that proper geotechnical and soil management surveys and techniques are implemented in order to reduce the likelihood of soils that are incapable of adequately supporting septic tanks be developed on.

Further, Policy RM-2.6 discourages the use of septic systems to reduce potential negative impacts to groundwater.

As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City of San Jacinto, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the CBSC, the General Plan policies and actions, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Future development and improvement projects would be required to prepare a site-specific geotechnical study to identify geologic and soil conditions specific to the site and provide design recommendations consistent with the requirements of State and City codes. Implementation of CBSC and the Municipal Code requirements related to seismic and geologic conditions and General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure that future development projects are evaluated for potential geologic and seismic risks and that potential risks are adequately addressed. With the implementation of the policies and actions in the General Plan Update, as well as applicable State and City codes, potential impacts associated with having soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems would be less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards. A community that is adequately prepared for natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 52 of 266 ends

within the geologic survey.

Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential negative impacts to groundwater.

Action RM-2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7.

Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as feasible.

6. Paleontological Resources
Threshold: Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-6, pages 5.7-33 through 5.7- 35)
Explanation: Only qualified, trained paleontologists with specific expertise in the type of fossils being evaluated can determine the scientific significance of paleontological resources. No geologic units in the Study Area are assigned a very high sensitivity. However, the following geologic units within the Study Area are assigned a high sensitivity: Mount Eden Formation at surface, Bautista Formation at surface, Older Surficial Sediments at surface, and Surficial Sediments at depth. Further, paleontological resources have been discovered within the Study Area. Therefore, it is possible that undiscovered paleontological resources could be encountered during ground-disturbing activities. The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes policies and actions to protect significant paleontological resources within the Study Area. Policy RM-3.1 protects areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code. Action RM3a ensures the City would continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 53 of 266 ends

resources pursuant to CEQA. As future development occurs, project sites located within areas identified as having high paleontological sensitivity would be required to prepare a resource assessment. The objective of the report is to determine if significant paleontological resources are potentially present and if the project would significantly impact these resources for measures to be implemented to avoid the resource; monitor soil disturbance where there is high potential for resources; and implement mitigation measure to mitigate impacts.

With implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions and compliance with SJDC Section 17.500.020, potential impacts to paleontological resources associated with future development anticipated by the General Plan Update would be reduced to less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code.

Policy RM-3.3: Public Education. Educate and actively involve the public in preserving cultural assets, including techniques, incentives, and legal requirements for preservation.

Policy RM-3.4: Tribal Consultation. Consult with Native American tribes that may be impacted by proposed development, as necessary, and in accordance with state, local, and tribal intergovernmental consultation requirements.

Policy RM-3.6: Historic Preservation. Identify, designate, and protect buildings, districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto.

Policy RM-3.7: Funding. Identify funding programs to assist private property owners in the preservation of historic resources.

Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.

Action RM-3d: For projects that involve ground disturbing activities on native soil, prior

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 54 of 266 ends

to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall enter a Treatment and Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and disposition of archaeological/cultural resources and human remains associated with Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during construction of the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors.

Following execution of the TDA by the developer and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, the TDA will be incorporated by reference into the grading permit.

Action RM-3e: The City shall require an assessment of the potential for development proposals to significantly impact paleontological resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. If the project involves earthworks, the City may require a study conducted by a professional paleontologist to determine if paleontological assets are present, and if the project will significantly impact the resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid impacting the paleontological materials, require monitoring of rock units with high potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontologic resources, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts, such as recovering the paleontological resources for preservation.

Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

H. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

1. Transport, Use, and Disposal of Hazardous Materials
Threshold: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-1, pages 5.9-15 through 5.9- 21)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update would accommodate the future development of both residential and non-residential uses. Increased development would result in an increase in the routine transport, use, and storage of hazardous materials in the City, potentially resulting in accidental releases. Exposure of persons to hazardous materials could also occur through the operations of future developments associated with the improper handling of hazardous materials/waste. The use, transportation, and

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 55 of 266 ends

disposal of hazardous materials is regulated and monitored by local fire departments, CUPAs, Cal OSHA, and the DTSC consistent with the requirements of federal, State, and local regulations and policies. Facilities that store hazardous materials on-site are required to maintain a Hazardous Materials Business Plan in accordance with State regulations. In addition to the requirements associated with federal, State, and local regulations, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address potential impacts associated with hazardous materials among other issues. Policy PS4.1 would ensure that Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.

Policy PS-4.4 promotes the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public. Policy PS-4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a requires, as part of the development review process, projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4b requires the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals. Action PS-4f minimizes public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. Actions PS-4g and PS-4h work to inform the public about proper hazardous waste disposal and implements collection services for hazardous waste. These General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level, and that business operations comply with federal and State regulations regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.

The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that the City has adequate emergency response plans and measures to respond in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance. Policy PS5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City. Policy PS-5.2 supports the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 56 of 266 ends

communication agreements for emergency situations. Policy PS-5.5 directs the City to participate in automatic and mutual aid agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources, facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies. Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to work with RCFD and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department (RCSD) to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios. Action PS-5b ensures the City regularly practices implementation of the EOP and updates it regularly. Action PS-5f ensures the City annually reviews and updates the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage during disasters. It also supports high-level multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.

Compliance with the requirements of federal, State, and local laws and regulations regarding the use and storage of hazardous materials would ensure that risks resulting from the routine transportation, use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.4: Truck Routes. Maintain a truck route network that supports the efficient movement of goods within and beyond the City, while minimizing noise and safety hazards to the extent feasible.

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.

Policy PS-4.1: Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.

Policy PS-4.2: Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.

Policy PS-4.3: County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 57 of 266 ends

Policy PS-4.4: Transportation. Promote the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public.

Policy PS-4.5: Household Hazardous Waste. Reduce the per capita production of household hazardous waste in San Jacinto in concert with the County of Riverside plans for reducing hazardous waste.

Policy PS-4.6: Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements.

Policy PS-4.7: Emergency Response. Work with RCFD and other responding agencies to ensure that emergency personnel respond safely and effectively to a hazardous materials incident in the city.

Policy PS-4.8: Public Education. Coordinate with the City’s waste service provider(s) and the County of Riverside to increase public awareness about proper disposal related to household hazardous waste and inform the San Jacinto community regarding relevant services and programs to address issues related to hazardous waste and materials.

Action PS-4a: As part of the development review process, require projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.

Action PS-4b: Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD.

Action PS-4c: Promote off-site hazardous materials and/or electronic waste drop-off.

Action PS-4d: Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals.

Action PS-4e:Continue to monitor regulations governing the use of pesticides and work with the County Agricultural Commissioner to promote the responsible use of pesticides.

Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.

Action PS-4g:Continue to work with the County of Riverside Environmental Health Department to implement and advertise the Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program to protect residents from dangers resulting from the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials used in the home. Provide informational materials at public locations and links on the City’s website about the County’s Household Hazardous Waste Collection program, the County’s Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil, and Paint (ABOP) program, collection facilities, drop-off centers, and the 24-hour Household Hazardous Waste hotline.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 58 of 266 ends

Action PS-4h:Continue to work with the County of Riverside’s Environmental Health Department to implement the Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) program, which is a hazardous waste pick-up disposal service for eligible, businesses/nonprofit organizations in the County of Riverside. This program provides an affordable way to legally dispose of this waste. Provide informational materials at public locations and links on the City’s website about the County’s CESQG program.

Action PS-4i: Amend the Municipal Code to require that, prior to issuance of any grading or building permit (whichever occurs first) for a project on a site identified on any list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, a formal Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-05 or the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) and submitted to the City’s Community Development Department. The Phase I ESA shall identify specific Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified Hazardous Materials Specialist with Phase II/site characterization experience prior to demolition, and/or construction. The Hazardous Materials Specialist shall identify proper remedial activities appropriate to the hazardous material(s) found (e.g., removal and disposal; bio-remediation; pump and treat; soil vapor extraction, and in situ oxidation), as necessary.

Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage, and disruption of vital services.

Policy PS-5.1:Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City.

Policy PS-5.2:Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations.

Policy PS-5.3:Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.

Policy PS-5.4:Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials, schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.5:Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources, facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.

Policy PS-5.6:Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of emergency.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 59 of 266 ends

Policy PS-5.7:Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.

Policy PS-5.8:Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.9:Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address ongoing hazard-specific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from disasters.

Policy PS-5.11: Community Training Programs. Support community-based emergency training programs as a valuable asset to the community.

Policy PS-5.12: Public Education. Educate residents and businesses through programs and outreach materials on hazards pertaining to San Jacinto and appropriate actions to safeguard life and property during and immediately after emergencies.

Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs and practices regarding emergency preparedness.

Action PS-5a:Coordinate with the County of Riverside to keep the Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan up to date.

Action PS-5b:Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations Plan and update it regularly.

Action PS-5c:Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures.

Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multijurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.

Action PS-5g:Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to the San Jacinto community.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 60 of 266 ends

Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.

Policy RM-10.3: Hazardous Waste. Promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste, including paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste, construction waste, and electronic waste, through education, monitoring, and enforcement of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.

Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.

Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including the following:
 Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling programs;
 Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics;
 Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and  Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.

2. Hazardous Materials Release
Threshold: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-2, pages 5.9-21 through 5.9- 28)
Explanation: Short-Term Construction-Related Accidental Release of Hazardous Materials
The General Plan Update would enable development of new residential, commercial, industrial, and public uses. Construction activities associated with new development could result in upset and/or accident conditions

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 61 of 266 ends

involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Future development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update could involve the demolition of existing structures and buildings as areas within the City are redeveloped. The presence of lead-based paint, asbestos-containing materials (ACM), and/or other contaminants are likely present in some structures. All demolition that could result in the release of ACMs or lead-based paint would be conducted according to federal and State regulations. In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403, if ACM material is found, abatement of asbestos would be required prior to any demolition activities. If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint waste would be required to be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 1532.1. If lead-based paint is found, abatement would be required to be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any demolition activities. Compliance with existing regulations related to ACM and lead-based paint would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

Future development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update could involve grading and excavation activities which could expose construction workers and the public to previously unknown hazardous substances present in the soil or groundwater. The public could also be exposed to hazardous materials if new development or redevelopment were to be located on a current or historical hazardous material site. Future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be reviewed at the project-level to determine whether any development sites are listed on a hazardous materials site. Any development activities that may occur on documented hazardous materials sites would be required to undergo remediation and cleanup under the supervision of the regulatory agencies, such as DTSC and the Santa Ana RWQCB. In addition to the requirements associated with federal, State, and local regulations, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address potential impacts associated with potentially contaminated sites.

Policy PS-4.1 would ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe. Policy PS-4.4 promotes the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public. Policy PS4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a requires, as part of

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 62 of 266 ends

the development review process, projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4f minimizes public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. Actions PS-4g and PS-4h work to inform the public about proper hazardous waste disposal and implements collection services for hazardous waste. Compliance with General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, and existing regulations would reduce potential impacts involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment as a result of on-site contamination to a less than significant level.

Long-Term Operations-Related Accidental Release of Hazardous Materials Long-term operation activities associated with new development could result in upset and/or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The transport, storage, and handling of hazardous materials by developers, contractors, business owners, and others are required to comply with federal, State, and local regulations during project construction and operation. Facilities that use hazardous materials are required to obtain permits from the EPA under the RCRA, which gives the EPA the authority to control the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. Additionally, the hazardous materials regulations included in federal law govern the transportation of hazardous materials. Locally, the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Branch is the CUPA for Riverside County and is responsible for consolidating, coordinating, and making consistent the administrative requirements, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities of state standards regarding the transportation, use, and disposal of hazardous materials in Riverside County, including the Study Area. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address potential accidental exposure of individuals as a consequence of unknown existing environmental contaminants. Action PS-4b requires the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals. Compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws related to the transport, storage, and handling of hazardous materials would reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents, and impacts involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be less than significant.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 63 of 266 ends

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.

Policy PS-4.1:Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.

Policy PS-4.2:Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.

Policy PS-4.3:County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.

Policy PS-4.4:Transportation. Promote the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public.

Policy PS-4.5:Household Hazardous Waste. Reduce the per capita production of household hazardous waste in San Jacinto in concert with the County of Riverside plans for reducing hazardous waste.

Policy PS-4.6:Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements.

Policy PS-4.8:Public Education. Coordinate with the City’s waste service provider(s) and the County of Riverside to increase public awareness about proper disposal related to household hazardous waste and inform the San Jacinto community regarding relevant services and programs to address issues related to hazardous waste and materials.

Action PS-4a:As part of the development review process, require projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 64 of 266 ends

Action PS-4b:Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD.

Action PS-4c: Promote off-site hazardous materials and/or electronic waste drop-off.

Action PS-4d:Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals.

Action PS-4e:Continue to monitor regulations governing the use of pesticides and work with the County Agricultural Commissioner to promote the responsible use of pesticides.

Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 65 of 266 ends

Policy PS-5.1:Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City.

Policy PS-5.2:Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations.

Policy PS-5.6:Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.8:Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.11: Community Training Programs. Support community-based emergency training programs as a valuable asset to the community.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 66 of 266 ends

Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs and practices regarding emergency preparedness.

Action PS-5a:Coordinate with the County of Riverside to keep the Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan up to date.

Action PS-5b:Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations Plan and update it regularly.

Action PS-5c:Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures.

Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including the following:

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 67 of 266 ends

 Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling programs;
 Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics;
 Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and  Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.

3. Hazards Near Schools
Threshold: Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-3, pages 5.9-28 through 5.9- 31)
Explanation: Future development within the Study Area could potentially emit or handle hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. In addition to the requirements associated with federal, State, and local regulations, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address potential impacts associated with hazardous materials. Policy PS4.1 would ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe. Policy PS-4.4 promotes the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public. Policy PS4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a requires, as part of the development review process, projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4b requires the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 68 of 266 ends

associated with those proposals. Action PS-4f minimizes public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. Actions PS-4g and PS-4h work to inform the public about proper hazardous waste disposal and implements collection services for hazardous waste. Implementation of the safety procedures and regulations mandated by applicable federal, State, and local laws and the General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure that potential risks resulting from the routine transportation, use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes in proximity to a school associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.

Policy PS-4.1:Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.

Policy PS-4.2:Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.

Policy PS-4.3:County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.

Policy PS-4.4:Transportation. Promote the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public.

Policy PS-4.5:Household Hazardous Waste. Reduce the per capita production of household hazardous waste in San Jacinto in concert with the County of Riverside plans for reducing hazardous waste.

Policy PS-4.6:Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 69 of 266 ends

Policy PS-4.8:Public Education. Coordinate with the City’s waste service provider(s) and the County of Riverside to increase public awareness about proper disposal related to household hazardous waste and inform the San Jacinto community regarding relevant services and programs to address issues related to hazardous waste and materials.

Action PS-4a:As part of the development review process, require projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.

Action PS-4b:Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD.

Action PS-4c: Promote off-site hazardous materials and/or electronic waste drop-off.

Action PS-4d:Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals.

Action PS-4e:Continue to monitor regulations governing the use of pesticides and work with the County Agricultural Commissioner to promote the responsible use of pesticides.

Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 70 of 266 ends

shall identify specific Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified Hazardous Materials Specialist with Phase II/site characterization experience prior to demolition, and/or construction. The Hazardous Materials Specialist shall identify proper remedial activities appropriate to the hazardous material(s) found (e.g., removal and disposal; bio-remediation; pump and treat; soil vapor extraction, and in situ oxidation), as necessary.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-10.3: Hazardous Waste. Promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste, including paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste, construction waste, and electronic waste, through education, monitoring, and enforcement of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.

4. Waste Sites
Threshold: Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-4, pages 5.9-32 through 5.9- 33)
Explanation: There are two site locations with a “certified” status listed on the Cortese list, compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Future

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 71 of 266 ends

development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be evaluated at the project-level to determine whether any development sites are listed on a hazardous materials site. Any development activities occurring on documented hazardous materials sites would be required to undergo remediation and cleanup under the supervision of the DTSC and the Santa Ana RWQCB prior to construction. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address potential impacts associated with hazardous materials. Policy PS-4.1 would ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.

Policy PS-4.3 utilizes the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.

Policy PS-4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a requires, as part of the development review process, projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4b requires the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals. Action PS-4f minimizes public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. Compliance with General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, and existing regulations would reduce potential impacts involving the hazardous materials sites.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.

Policy PS-4.1:Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.

Policy PS-4.2:Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 72 of 266 ends

County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.

Policy PS-4.3:County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.

Policy PS-4.6:Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance with environmental review requirements.

Action PS-4a:As part of the development review process, require projects that result in significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.

Action PS-4b:Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses and developments to RCFD.

Action PS-4d:Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts associated with those proposals.

Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.

5. Public Airports
Threshold: For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 73 of 266 ends

Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-5, pages 5.9-34) Explanation: There are no airports within the Study Area. The closest airport to the Study Area is the Hemet-Ryan Airport, located approximately seven miles south of the City of San Jacinto. According to the ALUCP, San Jacinto is not located within an Airport Influence Area. Because the Study Area is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport, impacts with regard to safety hazards to people residing or working in the Study Area would be less than significant.

6. Emergency Plans
Threshold: Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-6, pages 5.9-34 through 5.9- 38)
Explanation: The General Plan Update would allow a variety of new development, including residential, commercial, industrial, and public projects, which would result in increased jobs and population in the Study Area. Road and infrastructure improvements would occur to accommodate the new growth.

Implementation of the General Plan Update would not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) provides fire and emergency response service to the City of San Jacinto. The RCFD Strategic Plan 2009-2029 outlines goals and strategies for fire protection services throughout the Riverside County OA, including facility needs and improvements, training requirements, and disaster preparedness. The City’s EOP addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents. The EOP focuses on coordinating mutual aid and provides an overview of the operational concepts relating to various emergency situations, identifies components of the emergency response, and describes the overall responsibilities of the Riverside County OA for supporting OA Members in protecting life and property. The EOP does not provide a specific evacuation route map, as evacuation measures would be implemented based on the specific emergency and area affected. The General Plan Update would not require or result in revisions to the RCFD Strategic Plan or adopted EOP.

The City prepared an analysis consistent with SB 99 to identify residential developments in hazard areas that do not have at least two emergency evacuation routes. The analysis found that out of 4,990 unique land parcels identified as residential and located within an identified hazard zone, the vast majority (approximately 77 percent) of the parcels have multiple exit points with access to multiple arterials, and another 13 percent of the parcels have multiple exit points with access to a single arterial, a loop road.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 74 of 266 ends

Approximately 10 percent of the developed parcels have one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial. Parcels with one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial are widespread throughout the Study Area, and tend to be condominium, apartment, and mobile home communities, or large rural residential parcels. There are no parcels in the Study Area described as having “one exit point with some distance to a single arterial.” The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address emergency evacuation routes. Specifically, Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.

The General Plan Update does not include any site-specific development.

However, future development would be designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with applicable standards, including vehicular access to ensure that adequate emergency access and evacuation would be maintained. Construction activities that may temporarily restrict vehicular traffic would be required to implement appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of persons and vehicles through/around any required road closures. The General Plan Update identifies major arterials as the primary routes for evacuation; however, evacuation routes would depend upon the emergency event and area affected. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address emergency response and evacuation. Action PS-2a implements the EOP to ensure the most effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency, and update it as needed. Policy PS-5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City. Policy PS-5.2 supports the development of local preparedness plans and multijurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations. Policy PS-5.5 directs the City to participate in automatic and mutual aid agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources, facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies. Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios. Action PS-5b ensures the City regularly practices implementation of the EOP and updates it regularly. Action PS-5f ensures the City annually reviews and updates the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage during disasters. It also supports high-level multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management. Action RM6c implements an Emergency Operation Center to respond to and manage disasters in cooperation with the school districts, police and fire

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 75 of 266 ends

departments, and local, state, and federal emergency management agencies.

It would also provide annual training for City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.

Primary access to all major roads would be maintained during construction of future developments within the Study Area. As part of the site plan and design review process (SJDC Chapter 17.630), future development projects would be reviewed for adequate infrastructure and access as well as consistency with adopted emergency and evacuation plans among many other environmental issues in order to ensure the safety of City residents and the physical environment. Therefore, impacts associated with adopted emergency response or evacuation plans would be less than significant GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-2a:Implement the City’s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure the most effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency, and update it as needed.

Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.

Policy PS-4.7:Emergency Response. Work with RCFD and other responding agencies to ensure that emergency personnel respond safely and effectively to a hazardous materials incident in the city.

Policy PS-5.1:Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City.

Policy PS-5.2:Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency situations.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 76 of 266 ends

Policy PS-5.6:Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.8:Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.

Policy PS-5.11: Community Training Programs. Support community-based emergency training programs as a valuable asset to the community.

Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs and practices regarding emergency preparedness.

Action PS-5a:Coordinate with the County of Riverside to keep the Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan up to date.

Action PS-5b:Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations Plan and update it regularly.

Action PS-5c:Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 77 of 266 ends

7. Wildland Fires
Threshold: Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-7, pages 5.9-38 through 5.9- 42)
Explanation: The Study Area and surrounding area contain designated Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in both Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) and State Responsibility Areas (SRA). The open space area on the western boundary of the City is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) under local responsibility. In addition, a mountainous undeveloped area in the southeast portion of the City, known as Park Hill, is also identified as a VHFHSZ under local responsibility. There are no SRA found within City limits; however, there are SRA within the eastern portion of the Study Area and pockets of SRA to the east and west of City limits.

Some of these areas are within the VHFHSZ in an SRA.

All new construction is required to adhere to standards and requirements set forth in the San Jacinto Municipal Code, which incorporates the California Fire Code. In accordance with SJDC Section 17.300.050, all development located in or adjacent to wildfire prone areas would be required to prepare a fire management plan, which would be reviewed by RCFD and may include additional fire protection measures (e.g., landscape or open space buffers), maintenance programs for weed and vegetation abatement, installation of fire-resistant plants, and the use of noncombustible building materials. Additionally, special attention would be given to development in hillside areas in the City per Municipal Code Chapter 15.28. Further, the General Plan Update Public Safety Element includes goals and policies to reduce the risk of wildland hazards. Policy PS-2.1 requires that all buildings and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes as well as other applicable fire safety standards. Policy PS-2.2 reduces the risk of fire to the

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 78 of 266 ends

community by coordinating emergency preparedness with the RCFD.

Policy PS-2.3 directs the City to work with RCFD to maintain and regularly update the City’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map for changes in fire hazard severity zones consistent with changes in hazard designations by CAL FIRE. Policy PS-2.10 protect communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within VHFHSZs through a variety of actions, including:
minimizing new residential development in VHFHSZs when possible; requiring adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency vehicle access for new development in VHFHSZs; assessing site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment; requiring ongoing brush management, fuel management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high wildfire risk; and working with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance. Policy PS-2.11 considers fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within VHFHSZs as part of the development review process. Action PS-2b mitigates, as feasible, existing non-conforming development to contemporary fire safe standards where feasible, including road standards and vegetative hazards. Action PS-2c requires that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City, including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.

Future development allowed under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with the provisions of federal, State, and local requirements related to wildland fire hazards, including State fire safety regulations associated with wildland-urban interfaces, fire-safe building standards, and defensible space requirements. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for potential impacts, specific to the project, associated with wildland fire hazards as required under CEQA. Therefore, through compliance with existing federal, State, and local laws and regulations related to wildland fire hazards and implementation of the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, impact regarding the exposure of people or structures to significant loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires would be less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire emergencies.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 79 of 266 ends

Policy PS-2.1:Building Fire Codes. Require that all buildings and facilities within San Jacinto comply with local, state, and federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes as well as other applicable fire safety standards.

Policy PS-2.2:Fire Protection Services. Reduce the risk of fire to the community by coordinating emergency preparedness with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD).

Policy PS-2.3:Fire Hazard Identification. Work with RCFD to maintain and regularly update the City’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (Figure PS-2) for changes in fire hazard severity zones consistent with changes in hazard designations by CAL FIRE.

Policy PS-2.5:Grant Funding. Seek grant funding, independently and in collaboration with regional partners, to mitigate potential wildfire threats to the community and to implement training workshops and projects related to defensible space and fuel reduction practices.

Policy PS-2.6:Regional Coordination. Coordinate with the County of Riverside, neighboring cities, and other fire protection agencies to reduce the potential for wildfire hazards in the San Jacinto community.

Policy PS-2.7:Interagency Support. Participate in the mutual aid system and automatic aid agreements to back up and supplement capabilities to respond to emergencies.

Policy PS-2.8:Public Education. Work with RCFD to disseminate educational programs for residents on fire hazard risks and fire safety measures, such as defensible space and evacuation routes, with a special focus on at-risk populations.

Policy PS-2.9:Post-fire Treatment. Work with CAL FIRE, United States Forest Service, United States Geologic Service, and applicable nongovernmental agencies to create a plan to address post-fire recovery activities and projects that allow burned areas to fully recover and minimize repetitive losses and further damage.

Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones. c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment. d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 80 of 266 ends

e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained. g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance. h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures, improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.

Policy PS-2.11: Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard severity zones as part of the development review process. a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires. b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles). c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices in accordance with the Development Code.
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.

Policy PS-2.12: Hazard Mitigation Plans. Coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies to update emergency, evacuation, and hazard mitigation plans, as necessary.

Policy PS-2.13: Essential Public Facilities and Infrastructure. Locate, when feasible, new essential public facilities and infrastructure outside of very high fire hazard severity zones, including but not limited to, hospitals and health care facilities, emergency shelters, emergency command centers, emergency communication facilities, and utilities or identify construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these facilities must be located in very high fire hazard severity zones.

Action PS-2a:Implement the City’s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure the most effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency, and update it as needed.

Action PS-2b:Mitigate, as feasible, existing non-conforming development to contemporary fire safe standards where feasible, including road standards and vegetative hazards.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 81 of 266 ends

Action PS-2c:Require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City, including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.

Action PS-2d:Participate in Mutual Aid Agreements with neighboring cities and the Riverside County Operational Area, as required by RCFD.

Policy RM-6.2: Department Consultation. Promote coordination between the City of San Jacinto and public safety services during the review of new development applications to ensure that adequate attention is being paid to fire and safety concerns during the design and planning of a project.

Action RM-6f: In cooperation with the Riverside County Fire Department, adopt and maintain level of service (e.g., response times, call handling) and staffing standards, as well as a developer fee program for fire services. Review the level of services and funding levels at budget time, adjusting when necessary to ensure that adequate levels of service and facilities are provided and maintained. Future developers will contribute funds for fire services through the adopted developer fees. During the budget and CIP process, reserve future sites through purchase, eminent domain, dedication, donation, or a combination of these procedures.

I. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

1. Water Quality Standards
Threshold: Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-1, pages 5.10-16 through

5.10-20)
Explanation: The General Plan Update sets policies and actions for build-out of the City, but it does not envision or authorize any specific development project.

Because of this, the site-specific details of potential future development projects are currently unknown and analysis of potential impacts of such projects is not feasible and would be speculative. However, grading, excavation, removal of vegetation cover, and loading activities associated with future construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Construction activities also could result in soil

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 82 of 266 ends

compaction and wind erosion impacts that could adversely affect soils and reduce the revegetation potential at construction sites and staging areas. each future project must include detailed project specific drainage plans that control storm water runoff and erosion, both during and after construction.

The RWQCB would require a project-specific SWPPP to be prepared for each future project that disturbs an area one acre or larger. The SWPPPs would include project-specific best management measures that are designed to control drainage and erosion.

Pursuant to the Riverside County MS4 NPDES Permit and SJDC Section

17.600.100, qualifying new development and redevelopment projects are required by the City to prepare a WQMP or similar demonstration of postconstruction BMPs to mitigate downstream impacts to flooding and water quality. BMPs identified in the WQMP would be required to address site design, source controls, and treatment controls. Projects not requiring a WQMP would be required to implement all of the minimum BMPs approved by the City Engineer. All new development and redevelopment projects must also be consistent with the Santa Ana River Region DAMP and would also be required to fulfill any conditions and requirements established by the City Engineer which are related to the reduction or elimination of pollutants in stormwater and urban runoff from the project site. Waters that are listed under Section 303(d) of the CWA are known as “impaired.” The City does not contain any CWA Section 303(d)-listed water bodies. The City manages local storm drain facilities and the RCFCWCD is responsible for regional flood control planning within the County. Provision of stormwater detention facilities as needed would reduce runoff rates and peak flows.

General Plan Update Public Safety and Resource Management goals, policies, and actions aim to enhance stormwater quality and infiltration as well as ensure development projects are reviewed to identify potential stormwater and drainage impacts and require development to include measures to confirm off-site runoff is not increased beyond predevelopment levels. Goal RM-2 aims to protect the City’s water resources.

Policy RM-2.2 protects aquifers and encourages groundwater recharge within the Basin. Policy RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local water agencies to manage stormwater runoff. Policy Action RM-1f would reduce soil erosion and pollutants in stormwater runoff by ensuring proper geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented through the development review process. Action RM-2a further reduces soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff by requiring new development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through implementation of BMPs and requiring projects of one acre or more to complete a SWPPP. Action RM-2b enhances water quality by cooperating with the RWQCB to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Actions RM-2g and

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 83 of 266 ends

RM-2h reduce potential impacts from septic systems on water sources by regulating new septic systems and encouraging the conversion from existing septic systems to sewer. Action RM-9e ensures cooperation with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations. Existing regulatory requirements that manage water quality include requirements to obtain approval from the RWQCB for NPDES permits, other discharge permits, WQMPs, SWPPPs, and to implement BMPs. These regulatory requirements are intended to ensure that water quality does not degrade to levels that would violate water quality standards. Through implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions, implementation of the Municipal Code requirements identified above, compliance with mandatory federal and State regulations, and compliance with the existing regulations for the San Jacinto River Watershed, future development projects associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water resources.

Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.

Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and encourage groundwater recharge.

Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential negative impacts to groundwater.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 84 of 266 ends

Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8- 2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).

Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.

Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream.

Action RM-2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size requirement of one-half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection is infeasible.

Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as feasible.

Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.

Specifically, the City should:
 During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during construction and development.
 Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any new development.
 Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in new public and private development and redevelopment projects.

Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 85 of 266 ends

federal, State and local regulations.

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g:During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals, require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the geologic survey.

Policy PS-3.7:Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce stormwater runoff.

Action PS-3b:Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4 permit.

2. Groundwater Supplies
Threshold: Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-2, pages 5.10-20 through

5.10-23)
Explanation: The Study Area is underlain by the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin of the San Jacinto River Watershed. Groundwater Basin resources in the San Jacinto River Watershed have been delineated into four separate groundwater sub-basins or groundwater management zones, of which the Study Area is within the Hemet/San Jacinto Groundwater Management Area. The Hemet/San Jacinto Management Area is in the western portion of Riverside County and includes the cities of San Jacinto and Hemet, and the unincorporated areas of Winchester, Valle Vista, and Cactus Valley.

The Study Area is served by three water service providers: the City of San Jacinto Water Department, the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), and the Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (LHMWD). The vast majority of the Study Area is located within the City’s and EMWD’s service area, while a small portion is located within the LHMWD service area. All three water service providers have concluded in their respective Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) that they will be able to meet projected future water demand.

Subsequent development projects under the General Plan Update, such as residential, commercial, industrial, and roadway projects, would result in new impervious surfaces and could reduce rainwater infiltration and

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 86 of 266 ends

groundwater recharge. However, the majority of development anticipated by the General Plan Update is within areas currently developed with urban uses. The General Plan Land Use Map proposed under the General Plan Update redesignates a minimal amount (97 acres or less than two percent of the Study Area) of land currently designated for open spaces uses to urban uses. The amount of new pavement and impervious surfaces, and the extent to which they affect infiltration, depends on the site-specific features and soil types of a given project site. Projects located in urban areas would have less of an impact than projects converting open lands and spaces.

Additionally, natural recharge to the San Jacinto Basin is primarily from percolation of flow in the San Jacinto River and its tributary stream. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map does not redesignate any land within the San Jacinto River; therefore, implementation under the General Plan Update would not significantly impact natural rainwater infiltration and groundwater recharge in the San Jacinto River beyond existing conditions.

Given that implementation and future buildout under the General Plan Update would not appreciably add to the volume of imperious surfaces in the Study Area, when compared to the overall size of the regional groundwater basin recharge area, and that there are adequate water supplies (including groundwater) to serve the projected buildout demand of the General Plan, this potential impact would be less than significant, and no additional mitigation is required. The General Plan Update Public Safety Element and Resource Management Element includes policies that support water conservation, groundwater management, and coordination with local water districts when planning for adequate capacity to accommodate future growth. Goal RM-2 aims to protect the City’s water resources. Policy RM2.1 directs cooperation with regional governments and other agencies with regard to groundwater quality and quantity. Policy RM-2.2 protects aquifers and encourages groundwater recharge within the Basin. Policy RM-2.3 promotes water conservation. Policy RM-2.4 promotes groundwater recharge by avoiding development that would impact watershed areas and natural drainage channels. Policy RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local water agencies to manage stormwater runoff. Policy RM-2.7 promotes the expanded use of reclaimed water, and Action RM-2c directs participation in programs that would expand the use of reclaimed water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Action RM-2d encourages conservation techniques, including aquifer and groundwater recharge programs, water conservation education, requiring drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and private areas, expanding the use of reclaimed water, and requiring water conservation devises in public and private development projects. Action RM-2f incorporates open space and preservation areas in areas used for ground water recharge and drainage detention. Action RM9a directs cooperation with water districts to ensure the provision and maintenance of adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities through analysis of impacts during the development proposal process,

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 87 of 266 ends

development impact fees, and requiring water conservation devices and water efficient landscaping. Action RM-9e ensures cooperation with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations. Implementation of the General Plan policies, combined with continued management of the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin, would further ensure that future development anticipated by the General Plan Update would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water resources.

Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and encourage groundwater recharge.

Policy RM-2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices.

Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Policy RM-2.7: Reclaimed Water. Promote the expanded use of reclaimed water, where feasible.

Action RM-2c: In cooperation with the state, regional, and local water agencies and suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Specifically, support the expansion of the use of recycled water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Cooperate with

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 88 of 266 ends

these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in development projects.

Action RM-2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water conservation in the following ways:
 Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs  Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional water districts
 Establishing water conservation education programs
 Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.
 Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
 Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.

Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or drainage detention.

Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.

Action RM-9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 89 of 266 ends

Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local regulations.

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-3.7:Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce stormwater runoff.

3. Erosion, Siltation, Flooding, and Runoff
Threshold: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or impede or redirect flood flows?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-3, pages 5.10-24 through

5.10-28)
Explanation: Erosion and Siltation
Implementation under the General Plan Update would result in new development projects, such as residential, commercial, industrial, and roadway projects, which may increase the area of impervious surfaces and/or result in alteration of existing drainage patterns. Future development under the General Plan Update would be subject to NPDES permit requirements that address the control of erosion and siltation. This includes the Construction General Permit, which requires a SWPPP and the effective implementation of erosion control measures for projects greater than one acre in size (or part of a larger plan of development). The Santa Ana RWQCB conducts inspections and enforces the Construction General Permit at construction sites. Additionally, future development on hillside areas would be subject to Municipal Code Chapter 15.28, Hillside Development, which requires City approval of a development plan prior to development on hillsides in the City. Approval of a hillside development plan may require drainage and landscaping features to reduce water erosion and provide for groundwater recharge, in accordance with the general grading guidelines described in Municipal Code Section 15.28.050, Soils, Grading, and Drainage.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 90 of 266 ends

Development under the General Plan Update would also be subject to the post-construction requirements of the MS4 NPDES permit. SJDC Section

17.600.100 requires as part of the permit application process preparation of a project-specific WQMP and drainage study for review and approval by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit(s). The WQMP ensures that implementing project designs have incorporated current LID methods (or adequately demonstrated why LID will not be feasible) for the effective treatment of pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff from a design storm event. Project-specific drainage studies would demonstrate the pre- and post-construction hydrology and hydraulics of implementing projects, and how the project and any incorporated elements, such as such detention basins, would ensure that adverse downstream impacts to receiving waters and/or receiving drainage facilities have been mitigated. Discharges that are not authorized by a NPDES permit must be permitted by other means by the Santa Ana RWQCB or SWRCB (e.g., filing a Report of Waste Discharge, Water Quality Certification).

Further, the General Plan Update Public Safety Element and Resource Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions that address erosion and siltation from the addition of impervious surfaces and alteration of existing drainage patterns. Policy PS-3.7 encourages new developments that add impervious surfaces to integrate LID BMPs to reduce stormwater runoff. Actions PS-1G and RM-1f require surveys of soil and geologic conditions during review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals, where appropriate, and requires mitigation if potential impacts are identified. Action PS-3b requires review of projects for project-related flood control and stormwater management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4 permit. Action RM-2a reduces erosion and siltation by requiring new development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through implementation of BMPs and requiring projects of one acre or more to complete a SWPPP. Action RM-2b enhances water quality by cooperating with the RWQCB to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Through implementation of the General Plan Update policies and existing regulations, erosion/siltation impacts from changes to the existing drainage patterns and increasing impervious surfaces would be less than significant and no mitigation is required
Surface Runoff
Future development under the General Plan Update has the potential to result in changes to the existing drainage patterns and could exceed the capacity of stormwater drainage systems and/or cause flooding on- or offsite of a project. The RCFCWCD and the City operate and maintain a network of flood control facilities within the Study Area. As specified in

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 91 of 266 ends

SJDC Section 17.600.100, WQMPs would be required for qualifying projects to incorporate LID BMPs into the drainage system, slowing onand off-site flow rates and decreasing flooding. WQMPs would also evaluate methods of on-site retention of runoff, such as cisterns, rain barrels, and basins which allow for a metered release of flows, typically after the rain event has passed, when capacity becomes available in the downstream pipes and channels. The General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and actions to provide adequate stormwater infrastructure for flood control and to reduce run-off quantity. Policy PS-3.7 encourages new developments that add impervious surfaces to integrate LID BMPs to reduce stormwater runoff. Policy PS-3.10 ensures coordination with the RCDCD to consider the expansion of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions associated with climate change and extreme weather. Policy PS-3.12 directs the City to regularly assess and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property. Action PS-3f ensures the City regularly reviews county, State, and federal flood control best practices and incorporates appropriate standards into the Municipal Code. Policy RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local water agencies to manage stormwater runoff. Action RM-2a requires new development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through implementation of BMPs and requiring projects of one acre or more to complete a SWPPP. Through implementation of the General Plan Update Plan goals, policies, and actions and existing federal, State, and local regulations discussed above, runoff would not exceed the capacity of drainage systems, provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or cause flooding impacts from changes to the existing drainage patterns and increased impervious surfaces. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Flood Flows
Several portions of the Study Area are subject to the 100-year flood and a small portion of the City is located within a mapped portion of the 500-year FEMA flood zone. Based on FEMA mapping, the northern portion of the City, generally located along the San Jacinto River and the Colorado River Aqueduct, is within a mapped portion of the 100-year FEMA flood zone.

The General Plan Update sets policies and actions for buildout of the City, but does not envision or authorize any specific development project. Policy PS-3.1 directs City coordination with local, state, and federal agencies to ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance with federal, state, and local standards. Policy PS-3.6 ensures the City adheres to the latest building, site, and design codes in the California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk of flooding hazards. Policy PS-3.8 protects the community from flood hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting development within the flood plain and flood way. Policy PS-3.11 requires

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 92 of 266 ends

all new development and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding to incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards. Policy PS-3.12 directs the City to regularly assess and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.

Policy RM-2.4 encourages development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible. Action PS-3f ensures the City regularly reviews county, State, and federal flood control best practices and incorporates appropriate standards into the Municipal Code. As described above, Municipal Code Chapter 15.40, Floodplain Management, provides land use and development regulations to all land within flood-prone, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion areas, including City review of development permits to ensure adherence to federal, State, and local flood-related regulations as well as additional standards applicable to all areas of special flood hazards in the City. Future development projects would be reviewed by the City to determine if a project site is located within areas of special flood hazards and thus subject to additional provisions set forth in Chapter 15.40. Additionally, construction of storm drainage improvements would occur as part of an overall development or infrastructure project, and would be considered in the environmental review associated with the specific project being proposed. With implementation of General Plan Update goals, policies, and implementation and compliance with existing regulations, the General Plan Update would not impede or redirect flood flows; impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g:During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals, require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained within the geologic survey.

Policy PS-3.1:Regulatory Compliance. Coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies to ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance with federal, state, and local standards.

Policy PS-3.6:Building Codes. Adhere to the latest building, site, and design codes in the California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk of flooding hazards in the community.

Policy PS-3.7:Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce stormwater runoff.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 93 of 266 ends

Policy PS-3.8:Development in the Flood Plain and Flood Way. Protect the community from flooding hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting development within the flood plain and flood way as necessary to protect public health and safety.

Policy PS-3.9:Existing Flood Zones. Maintain dialogue with the RCFCD regarding regional flood facilities.

Policy PS-3.10: Changing Conditions. Coordinate with the RCDCD to consider the need to expand the capacity of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions associated with climate change and extreme weather.

Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.

Policy PS-3.12: Adequate Infrastructure. Maintain and regularly assess the status of local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.

Action PS-3b:Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4 permit.

Action PS-3f: Periodically review county, state, and federal flood control best practices and incorporate appropriate standards into the Municipal Code.

Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water conservation strategy.

Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 94 of 266 ends

Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.

Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream.

4. Flood Hazard, Tsunami, and Seiche Zones
Threshold: In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-4, pages 5.10-28 through

5.10-32)
Explanation: Several portions of the Study Area are subject to the 100-year flood and a small portion of the City is located within a mapped portion of the 500-year FEMA flood zone. Based on FEMA mapping, the northern portion of the City, generally located along the San Jacinto River and the Colorado River Aqueduct, is within a mapped portion of the 100-year FEMA flood zone. pursuant to the CWA, each subsequent development project or improvement project that disturbs more than one acre would be required to obtain NPDES coverage under the Construction General Permit, which would require an approved SWPPP that includes BMPs for grading and preservation of topsoil. SWPPPs are designed to control storm water quality degradation to the extent practicable using BMPs during and after construction. In addition, the regulations of San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 15.40 restrict land uses that are dangerous to public health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards and require land uses vulnerable to flood, mudslide, or flood-related erosion be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction. Further, the General Plan Update Safety Element includes goals, policies, and actions to reduce the risk of flooding and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Policy PS-3.1 directs City coordination with local, state, and federal agencies to ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance with federal, state, and local standards. Policy PS-3.4 directs coordination with FEMA to ensure that FIRMs correctly depict flood hazards in the City.

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 95 of 266 ends

Policy PS-3.5 reduces flood hazards and addresses flood-prone areas within San Jacinto through implementation of the standards and requirements defined in the Municipal Code. Policy PS-3.6 ensures the City adheres to the latest building, site, and design codes in the California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk of flooding hazards. Policy PS-3.8 protects the community from flood hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting development within the flood plain and flood way. Policy PS-3.10 ensures coordination with the RCDCD to consider the expansion of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions associated with climate change and extreme weather. Policy PS-3.11 requires all new development and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding to incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards. Policy PS-3.12 directs the City to regularly assess and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property. Action PS-3a monitors changes in federal and State laws and regulations related to local flood protection, including the NFIP and incorporates necessary changes into the Municipal Code, the City's Emergency Operations Plan, and building codes as required and ensures that the City’s regulations require that new development within flood hazard zones is consistent with the Public Safety Element and meets flood protection requirements of State law. Action PS3c disseminates information on flooding, flood control on private property, floodplains, and flood preparedness to the public. Action PS-3e requires all development located within a 100-year flood plain to be consistent with the requirements of FEMA. Action PS-3f ensures the City regularly reviews county, State, and federal flood control best practices and incorporates appropriate standards into the Municipal Code. Action PS-3h ensures continued City participation in the NFIP. Action PS-3i ensures continued implementation of the Flood Plain Management program, and ensures continued compliance with the rules and regulations for development in areas of special flood hazards as determined by the FEMA and as illustrated on the most recent FIRM.

The Study Area is located approximately 41 miles from the Pacific Ocean; therefore, the Study Area is too far away from the nearest ocean to have any meaningful tsunami risk.

Much of the western and eastern portions of San Jacinto have the potential to be inundated during failure of one or more dams. However, as described above, the dams potentially affecting the Study Area do not have a history of dam failure, and monitoring and mitigation of dam failure is constantly occurring at both the federal and State levels. Additionally, the General Plan Update Safety Element includes goals, policies, and actions to reduce the risks associated with dam inundation. Policy PS-3.2 ensures coordination with the agencies responsible for dam operation and maintenance to reduce the risk of dam inundation from the San Jacinto Reservoir, Diamond Valley

4.1.f
Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Resolution No. 3949 - Exhibit "A" - CEQA Findings of Fact (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Findings

Page 96 of 266 ends

San Jacinto City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

San Jacinto City Council
November 15, 2022