Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 17 of 26)

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3366 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
513.36 104.2074 6.1585 0.0000 258.1695
Apartments Mid
Rise
2747.58 557.7339 32.9611 0.0000 1,381.762
2 City Park 0.4 0.0812 4.8000e0030.0000 0.2012
Condo/Townhous
e
3260.94 661.9414 39.1196 0.0000 1,639.931
7 Congregate Care
(Assisted Living)

45.63 9.2625 0.5474 0.0000 22.9474
General Heavy
Industry
3018.18 612.6633 36.2074 0.0000 1,517.847
3 General Office
Building
7022.65 1,425.534
5 84.2467 0.0000 3,531.701
4 Government
(Civic Center)
1913.83 388.4902 22.9591 0.0000 962.4680
Government
Office Building
541.46 109.9115 6.4956 0.0000 272.3011
Library 773.02 156.9161 9.2735 0.0000 388.7529
Office Park 3679.84 746.9743 44.1449 0.0000 1,850.597
1 Single Family
Housing
24450.8 4,963.283
3 293.3216 0.0000 12,296.32
43 Strip Mall 879.55 178.5407 10.5515 0.0000 442.3270
Total 9,915.540
2 585.9916 0.0000 24,565.33
11 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 81 of 83 Date: 10/21/2021 12:03 PM San Jacinto General Plan Buildout Year (2040) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3367 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

45.63 9.2625 0.5474 0.0000 22.9474
General Heavy
Industry
3018.18 612.6633 36.2074 0.0000 1,517.847
3 General Office
Building
7022.65 1,425.534
5 84.2467 0.0000 3,531.701
4 Government
(Civic Center)
1913.83 388.4902 22.9591 0.0000 962.4680
Government
Office Building
541.46 109.9115 6.4956 0.0000 272.3011
Library 773.02 156.9161 9.2735 0.0000 388.7529
Office Park 3679.84 746.9743 44.1449 0.0000 1,850.597
1 Single Family
Housing
24450.8 4,963.283
3 293.3216 0.0000 12,296.32
43 Strip Mall 879.55 178.5407 10.5515 0.0000 442.3270
Total 9,915.540
2 585.9916 0.0000 24,565.33
11 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 82 of 83 Date: 10/21/2021 12:03 PM San Jacinto General Plan Buildout Year (2040) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3368 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

11.0 Vegetation

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 83 of 83 Date: 10/21/2021 12:03 PM San Jacinto General Plan Buildout Year (2040) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3369 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3370 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Administrative Draft | October 2021 35 Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change, and Energy Appendix C:

Energy Consumption Output

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3371 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3372 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) On-road Mobile (Operational) Energy Usage
Note: Assumes that all vehicles that are generated as part of proposed project use gasoline as a fuel source (for simplicity), since the vast majority of vehicles generated by the project would use gasoline.

Unmitigated:

Step 1:

Therefore:

Average Daily VMT:
4,041,488 Note: Estimated via CalEEMod output (1,475,143,153 annual VMT, divided by 365 days per year).

Step 2: Given:

Fleet Mix (CalEEMod Output)
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

55.42% 5.99% 18.03% 12.42% 2.14% 0.62% 1.09% 1.61% 0.06% 0.02% 2.20% 0.09% 0.29% And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class - Year 2040 (EMFAC2021 Output) LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV MCY MH OBUS UBUS

34.41 29.24 27.97 23.00 43.43 4.87 5.77 15.94
Diesel MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class - Year 2040 (EMFAC2021 Output) LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD SBUS

21.65 18.40 9.80 7.50 8.01
Therefore:

Weighted Average MPG Factors
Gasoline: 31.4 Diesel: 14.6
Step 3: Therefore: Therefore:
121,261 daily gallons of gasoline 15,347.17 daily gallons of gasoline or or
44,260,184 annual gallons of gasoline 5,601,716 annual gallons of gasoline

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3373 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Off-road (i.e. On-site) Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage Note: For the sake of simplicity, and as a conservative estimation, it was assumed that all off-road vehicles use diesel fuel as an energy source.

Demolition, Site preparation and grading off-road mobile vehicle on-site gallons of fuel are calculated below.

Given Factor: 965.0 metric tons CO2 (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Conversion Factor: 2204.6262 pounds per metric ton
Intermediate Result: 2,127,442 pounds CO2
Conversion Factor: 22.38 pounds CO2 per 1 gallon of diesel fuel Source: U.S. EIA, 2016 Final Result: 95,060 gallons diesel fuel http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=307&t=11 Mitigated Onsite Scenario
Site Preparation 365.7505
Grading 599.2394
Total CO2 (MT/yr) (provided in CalEEMod Output File)

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3374 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Site Preparation Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
18 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

14.7 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
265
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.28 23.36 22.70
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.65 Step 3: Therefore:
10 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 262 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 2,702 Total gallons of gasoline

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3375 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Grading
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
20 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

14.7 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
294
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.28 23.36 22.70
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.65 Step 3: Therefore:
11 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 261 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 2,991 Total gallons of gasoline

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3376 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Building Construction Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output) Total Daily Vendor Trips (CalEEMod Output) 86 254
Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output) Vendor Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

14.7 6.9
Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT: Average Vendor Daily VMT:
593 3,734
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2 Fleet Mix for Workers (CalEEMod Output)

0.5 0.25 0.25 MHD HHD
Assumed Fleet Mix for Vendors 0% 100%
And:

MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 Gasoline: Diesel:

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MHD HHD

28.28 23.36 22.70 8.14 6.01
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker (Gasoline) MPG Factor Weighted Average Vendor (Diesel) MPG Factor

25.65 6.01
Step 3: Therefore: Therefore:

Worker daily gallons of gasoline 99 146 Vendor daily gallons of diesel Step 4: 3543 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore: Therefore:

Total gallons of gasoline 349,756 515,677 Total gallons of diesel

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3377 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Paving
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
15 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

14.7 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
221
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.28 23.36 22.70
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.65 Step 3: Therefore:
9 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 261 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 2,243 Total gallons of gasoline

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3378 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Architectural Coating Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output) Total Daily Vendor Trips (CalEEMod Output) 86 254
Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output) Vendor Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

14.7 6.9
Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT: Average Vendor Daily VMT:
593 3,734
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2 Fleet Mix for Workers (CalEEMod Output)

0.5 0.25 0.25 MHD HHD
Assumed Fleet Mix for Vendors 0% 100%
And:

MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 Gasoline: Diesel:

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MHD HHD

28.28 23.36 22.70 8.14 6.01
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker (Gasoline) MPG Factor Weighted Average Vendor (Diesel) MPG Factor

25.65 6.01
Step 3: Therefore: Therefore:

Worker daily gallons of gasoline 99 146 Vendor daily gallons of diesel Step 4: 674 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore: Therefore:

Total gallons of gasoline 66,536 98,099 Total gallons of diesel

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3379 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: County
Region: Riverside
Calendar Year: 2022
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC202x Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT Fuel Consumption MPG (Derived) Riverside 2022 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 215.1333291 11664.07426 1.205447515 9.676136138 Riverside 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 631263.9969 25847634.02 914.0720229 28.27745886 Riverside 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2196.653698 78564.3487 1.869583594 42.02237812 Riverside 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 59198.30437 2131713.274 91.25607995 23.35968492 Riverside 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 34.7886086 679.0259591 0.02790836 24.3305572 Riverside 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 261723.7424 11028402.51 485.8573097 22.69885066 Riverside 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 794.7199281 35894.03111 1.151766279 31.16433582 Riverside 2022 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 24636.9459 880794.7049 68.81347567 12.79974157 Riverside 2022 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 19562.12381 724726.8784 35.57323486 20.37281347 Riverside 2022 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3846.221116 134927.7274 11.75874572 11.47467006 Riverside 2022 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8604.492864 323393.4583 19.14091367 16.89540342 Riverside 2022 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 30959.73459 182837.7155 4.417655057 41.38795654 Riverside 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 216352.2701 8582929.894 465.0624703 18.45543436 Riverside 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3170.444078 132949.0743 5.782148851 22.99302175 Riverside 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6636.976991 58779.89086 12.08018686 4.865809737 Riverside 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2733.786727 24412.34718 2.352554249 10.37695398 Riverside 2022 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 53.94328758 7715.34335 1.372729691 5.620438897 Riverside 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 567.9898279 25802.03422 5.161818392 4.998632703 Riverside 2022 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 51023.12477 10.5814287 4.82195044 Riverside 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 516.3584192 23324.40668 2.640416929 8.833607458 Riverside 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 675.6625066 14483.87787 1.980586861 7.312922326 Riverside 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14.21983044 965.4698166 0.10730922 8.997081646 Riverside 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 19.13486381 1324.450974 0.146797208 9.022317209 Riverside 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 57.98605851 3460.828288 0.37980663 9.112079706 Riverside 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 102.662908 21687.56297 2.227985047 9.734160021 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 510.0944424 17397.65983 1.965450107 8.851743308 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 472.7443839 16615.29736 1.905327265 8.720442767 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1386.191328 47598.85182 5.322503947 8.942943451 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 216.292565 11758.7032 1.2598304 9.333560453 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1927.608036 78769.05083 8.89158249 8.858833725 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4052.093779 182023.2237 20.77686849 8.760859403 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3052.0604 131682.5488 14.80295951 8.895690673 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1402.861312 67606.99334 7.44886816 9.076143099 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 22.36180159 1115.674721 0.123980138 8.998818208 Riverside 2022 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 444.8325529 26956.08499 2.770700009 9.728980007 Riverside 2022 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8.382871587 564.4069441 0.062746924 8.994973912 Riverside 2022 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.23595738 774.2648336 0.085856521 9.018124912 Riverside 2022 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 34.12660902 2023.176162 0.222151373 9.107196282 Riverside 2022 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 57.63572068 14711.00649 1.509790578 9.743739767 Riverside 2022 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 115.4849032 3868.378192 0.453927336 8.522020782 Riverside 2022 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 158.8393829 5838.881531 0.686744562 8.502261034 Riverside 2022 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 249.3339481 8274.454229 0.976381981 8.474607672 Riverside 2022 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 390.9998527 16637.94328 1.927972726 8.629760712 Riverside 2022 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 209.9870732 8558.803222 0.93309666 9.172472255 Riverside 2022 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.86590606 1608.118137 0.175289881 9.174050034 Riverside 2022 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 45.29789912 2233.061565 0.242447 9.210514332 Riverside 2022 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1966.180451 98100.58886 19.41962419 5.051621384 Riverside 2022 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5206.882173 1095323.97 181.6804392 6.028849199 Riverside 2022 T7 NNOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4696.272401 1300712.472 216.104369 6.018908724 Riverside 2022 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1954.930231 472444.866 78.85192679 5.991544978 Riverside 2022 T7 POLA Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2459.996522 321415.4571 53.46728429 6.011441603 Riverside 2022 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 784.932784 31300.93516 5.422416097 5.772507053 Riverside 2022 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1255.758902 89028.78422 14.92594238 5.964701053 Riverside 2022 T7 Single Dump Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1152.416374 71342.73176 12.03971461 5.925616517 Riverside 2022 T7 Single Other Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1300.273789 78694.87238 13.18149521 5.970102111 Riverside 2022 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 86.49291113 5615.46853 2.076624054 2.704133432 Riverside 2022 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5327.039618 449395.1129 73.51608191 6.112881716 Riverside 2022 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 143.8060574 6791.312355 1.114604618 6.093023703 Riverside 2022 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 13.99919805 814.1099593 0.222520106 3.658590568 Riverside 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 145.6342999 18438.99521 3.273571136 5.632685054 Riverside 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.3117338 30.10971099 0.002674589 11.2576967

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3380 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: County
Region: Riverside
Calendar Year: 2040
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC202x Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT Fuel Consumption MPG (Derived) Riverside 2040 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 255.2160274 13001.985 1.233482034 10.5408791 Riverside 2040 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 655711.4109 26596413.01 772.8533566 34.4132723 Riverside 2040 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 521.1608025 17786.59318 0.3474007 51.19907117 Riverside 2040 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 48889.87352 1869688.222 63.9341365 29.24397394 Riverside 2040 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.475336673 19.89219725 0.000701979 28.33730413 Riverside 2040 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 375573.3925 15298599.53 546.9812666 27.96914714 Riverside 2040 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1405.091633 57913.23102 1.559127657 37.1446371 Riverside 2040 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 18757.80526 644187.6209 38.21770284 16.85573891 Riverside 2040 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13876.69728 453073.0332 20.92508779 21.65214492 Riverside 2040 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2420.793073 78846.47185 5.312660544 14.84124032 Riverside 2040 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6872.323772 215264.0386 11.69615793 18.40467954 Riverside 2040 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 32902.60771 181877.3794 4.187431115 43.43411853 Riverside 2040 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 232009.4974 9090304.297 395.2282756 23.00013653 Riverside 2040 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2650.579898 101959.1241 3.636024277 28.04137605 Riverside 2040 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2796.997408 26394.28376 5.418346538 4.871280117 Riverside 2040 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1946.052442 15865.56039 1.539396702 10.30634947 Riverside 2040 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 67.56114955 8483.494485 1.324443437 6.405327889 Riverside 2040 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 313.0033865 9821.930628 1.702288847 5.769837855 Riverside 2040 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 37529.16914 6.595789574 5.689867562 Riverside 2040 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 355.7695047 16425.12966 1.747222072 9.400710945 Riverside 2040 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 270.7839676 5529.913973 0.690190992 8.012150309 Riverside 2040 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9.948723176 687.6253342 0.068679041 10.01215684 Riverside 2040 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 12.30671682 947.5841114 0.094664086 10.00996422 Riverside 2040 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 54.77873709 2443.740169 0.244412985 9.998405656 Riverside 2040 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 123.897688 24993.05127 2.186672917 11.42971638 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 455.8411143 14798.95802 1.546930003 9.566662997 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 435.0222922 14119.86431 1.481222389 9.532575535 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1248.503044 40524.23383 4.230660031 9.578702504 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 247.9124542 12385.6076 1.292002356 9.586366107 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Other Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1718.029197 65410.53102 6.796461696 9.624203585 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Other Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3938.580078 150870.421 15.67660495 9.623921852 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Other Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2849.754697 109318.5842 11.34006415 9.640032254 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Other Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1717.959033 65189.07122 6.82400491 9.552905087 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 19.68100956 889.1449615 0.091520575 9.715246684 Riverside 2040 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 598.0286343 33529.90614 3.163388088 10.59936536 Riverside 2040 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.46535686 836.5410653 0.077956239 10.73090597 Riverside 2040 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14.13688978 1147.583912 0.106992029 10.72588235 Riverside 2040 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 63.40695332 2998.669593 0.279506185 10.72845522 Riverside 2040 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 78.66278504 21804.05676 1.824529594 11.95050868 Riverside 2040 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 75.89086181 2611.463168 0.284092051 9.192313415 Riverside 2040 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 125.5099309 4314.067948 0.472420476 9.131839472 Riverside 2040 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 164.319314 5667.61914 0.614422216 9.224306991 Riverside 2040 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 286.940196 11885.2481 1.254640423 9.473031378 Riverside 2040 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 121.5874433 4776.992286 0.482929818 9.891690481 Riverside 2040 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 22.98042109 902.9591838 0.091255758 9.894818764 Riverside 2040 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 25.42421155 1211.528377 0.121644428 9.959587909 Riverside 2040 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1578.313865 75769.67527 12.95731675 5.847636259 Riverside 2040 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6690.719701 1405581.307 189.464949 7.418687806 Riverside 2040 T7 NNOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7320.126199 2121715.218 271.9359599 7.80226057 Riverside 2040 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3159.305226 770649.5349 99.89156107 7.714861262 Riverside 2040 T7 POLA Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2444.957788 472677.4546 67.12554572 7.041692541 Riverside 2040 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 398.8519 15451.27859 2.46219955 6.275396561 Riverside 2040 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 745.1321853 47456.2136 7.007274518 6.772421072 Riverside 2040 T7 Single Dump Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1024.409158 49636.67585 7.726543679 6.424175921 Riverside 2040 T7 Single Other Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1545.272659 78194.56664 12.04645356 6.491086047 Riverside 2040 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15.61070008 1012.777357 0.346820816 2.920174655 Riverside 2040 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9643.428073 631201.1134 87.73838597 7.194127251 Riverside 2040 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 124.9091554 5106.596571 0.773568249 6.601352344 Riverside 2040 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2.667719027 269.2894132 0.054672879 4.925466076 Riverside 2040 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 101.620965 9388.478738 0.589083177 15.9374416

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 3381 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix E - Greenhouse Gas Report (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix F: Noise Impact Study

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3382 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3383 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA
Prepared for:

De Novo Planning Group
180 East Main St., #108
Tustin, CA 92780
Prepared by:

MD Acoustics, LLC
Claire Pincock, INCE-USA
Mike Dickerson, INCE-USA
Roma Stromberg, M.S.
1197 Los Angeles Ave, Ste C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Date: 7/15/2022

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3384 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Table of Contents
MD Acoustics, LLC ii
JN: 04621801_071522

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives 1

1.2 Site Location and Study Area 1

1.3 Existing Land Uses 1

1.4 Proposed Project Description 2

2.0 Fundamentals of Noise ................................................................................................................... 8

2.1 Sound, Noise, and Acoustics 8

2.2 Frequency and Hertz 8

2.3 Sound Pressure Levels and Decibels 8

2.4 Addition of Decibels 8

2.5 Human Response to Changes in Noise Levels 9

2.6 Noise Descriptors 10

2.7 Tonal Sounds 11

2.8 Sound Propagation 12

2.9 Ground Absorption 12

2.10 Sound Attenuation 12

3.0 Ground-Borne Vibration Fundamentals ....................................................................................... 15

3.1 Vibration Descriptors 15

3.2 Vibration Perception 17

3.3 Vibration Propagation 17

4.0 Regulatory Setting ......................................................................................................................... 18

4.1 Federal Regulations 18

4.2 State Regulations 20

4.3 City of San Jacinto 20

5.0 Study Method and Procedure ....................................................................................................... 31

5.1 Noise Measurement Procedure and Criteria 31

5.2 SoundPLAN Noise Modeling 31

5.3 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model 32

6.0 Existing Noise Environment .......................................................................................................... 36

6.1 Noise Sources in the Study Area 36

6.2 Existing Noise Measurements 36

6.3 Existing Noise Modeling 39

6.4 Vibration Sources in the Study Area 42

7.0 Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation ................................................................... 43

7.1 Transportation Noise 43

7.2 Stationary Noise 50

7.3 Construction Noise 51

7.4 Groundborne Vibration 52

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3385 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Table of Contents
MD Acoustics, LLC iii
JN: 04621801_071522

8.0 CEQA Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 55

9.0 References .................................................................................................................................... 58

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: SoundPLAN Data
Appendix B: Noise Measurement Data and Field Sheets
Appendix C: FHWA Roadway Noise Worksheets

LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Location Map ...................................................................................................................... 3 Exhibit B: Plan Area ............................................................................................................................. 4 Exhibit C: Existing General Plan Land Use Map .................................................................................. 5 Exhibit D: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map ............................................................................... 6 Exhibit E: Proposed Roadway Classifications ...................................................................................... 7 Exhibit F: Typical Ground-borne Vibration Levels ............................................................................ 16 Exhibit G: Noise Measurement Location Map .................................................................................. 38 Exhibit H: Existing Roadway Noise Level Contours (CNEL)................................................................ 41 Exhibit I: 2040 Future Noise Contours (CNEL) ................................................................................. 48

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Decibel Addition ............................................................................................................................ 8 Table 2: Typical Noise Levels....................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Perceived Changes in Noise Levels ............................................................................................. 10 Table 4: Noise Reduction Afforded by Common Building Construction .................................................. 13 Table 5: Typical Human Reaction and Effect on Buildings Due to Ground-Borne Vibration ................... 15 Table 6: FHWA Design Noise Levels .......................................................................................................... 19 Table 7: PS-1 Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure (dBA, CNEL) ................................ 21 Table 8: PS-2 Allowable Interior Noise Levels Due to Transportation Noise Sources .............................. 23 Table 9: Designated Noise Zones .............................................................................................................. 27

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3386 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Table of Contents
MD Acoustics, LLC iv
JN: 04621801_071522

Table 10: PS-3 Allowable Exterior Noise Level1 Due to Stationary Noise Sources ................................... 28 Table 11: PS-4 Allowable Interior Noise Level1 Due to Stationary Noise Sources .................................... 28 Table 12: Existing Conditions Roadway Noise Modeling Parameters ...................................................... 32 Table 13: 2040 Future Conditions Roadway Noise Modeling Parameters ............................................... 34 Table 14: Short-Term Noise Measurement Summary .............................................................................. 36 Table 15: Long-Term Noise Measurement Summary ............................................................................... 37 Table 16: Existing Exterior Noise Levels Along Roadways ........................................................................ 39 Table 17: Existing and Planned Roadway Designations ............................................................................ 43 Table 18: Future Traffic Noise Levels (dBA, CNEL) .................................................................................... 44 Table 19: Change in Noise Along Roadways Due to San Jacinto General Plan Update (dBA, CNEL) ....... 46 Table 20: Typical Construction Noise Levels ............................................................................................. 51 Table 21: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ............................................................... 53 Table 22: Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ....................................................... 54

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3387 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Introduction

1 1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
This noise assessment was prepared to evaluate the potential noise impacts for the project study area and to recommend noise mitigation measures, if necessary, to minimize the potential noise impacts.

The assessment was conducted and compared to the noise standards set forth by the Federal, State, and Local agencies. Consistent with the City’s Noise Guidelines, the project must demonstrate compliance to the applicable noise criterion as outlined within the City’s Noise Element and Municipal Code.

The following is provided in this report:
 A description of the study area and the proposed project  Information regarding the fundamentals of noise and vibration  A description of the local noise and vibration guidelines and standards  An analysis of traffic noise impacts to and from the project site  An analysis of stationary noise impacts to and from the project site  An analysis of construction noise impacts
 An analysis of ground-borne vibration impacts to and from the project site  Suggested mitigation measures to reduce impacts

1.2 Site Location and Study Area
The City of San Jacinto is located at the base of the San Jacinto Mountains and adjacent to the San Jacinto River; refer to Exhibit A, Location Map. The City is approximately 26 square miles (16,700 acres) and is located north of the City of Hemet in Western Riverside County. The City sits approximately 27 miles west of the San Bernardino National Forest and approximately 21 miles east of the City of Perris.

State Route 79 runs through the City and is the primary corridor for regional access to San Jacinto.

The Study Area is the geographic area for which the General Plan Update provides a framework for long-term growth and resource conservation. State law requires the Study Area for the General Plan Update to include all territory within San Jacinto’s incorporated area as well as "any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency's judgment bears relation to its planning" (California Government Code Section 65300). The General Plan Update Study Area, as shown in Exhibit B includes the entire city limits (approximately 16,700 acres) as well as the City of San Jacinto’s Sphere of Influence (approximately 6,100 acres); the entire Study Area is approximately 22,800 acres.

1.3 Existing Land Uses
San Jacinto is dominated by single-family housing. Other residential uses, including mobile home communities and multi-family housing developments, exist in San Jacinto but are less prevalent than single-family developments within the City. Additionally, there are several pockets of retail and light

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3388 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Introduction

2 industrial land uses and parks spread throughout the city. There is also a significant amount of vacant land within the City boundaries and across its sphere of influence.

1.4 Proposed Project Description
The City of San Jacinto is preparing a comprehensive update to its existing General Plan. The updated San Jacinto General Plan is expected to be adopted in 2022 and will guide the City’s development and conservation through land use objectives and policy guidance. The General Plan Update is intended to be an expression of the community’s vision for the City and Study Area and constitutes the policy and regulatory framework by which future development projects will be reviewed, and public improvements will be implemented. The City will implement the General Plan Update by requiring development, infrastructure improvements, and other projects to be consistent with its policies and by implementing the actions included in the General Plan Update.

The City’s General Plan was last comprehensively updated in 2006, and the Housing Element was adopted in 2013. The City’s Existing General Plan Land Use Plan (Exhibit C) represents the current plan for land use development within the Study Area which includes the City and its Sphere of Influence.

The proposed General Plan Land Use Plan is shown in Exhibit D, and the Proposed Roadway Classifications Map is shown in Exhibit E. The purpose of this noise and vibration impact analysis is to evaluate the potential for the updated Land Use Plan and any changes to the Roadway Circulation Plan to result in impacts to the community and to recommend mitigation measures when applicable.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3389 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA
Exhibit A
Location Map
Introduction3

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3390 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit B
Plan Area
Introduction4
San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3391 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit C
Existing General Plan Land Use Map
Introduction5
San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3392 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit D
Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
Introduction6
San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3393 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit E
Proposed Roadway Classifications
Introduction7
San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3394 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

8 2.0 Fundamentals of Noise
This section of the report provides basic information about noise and presents some of the terms used within the report.

2.1 Sound, Noise, and Acoustics
Sound is a disturbance created by a moving or vibrating source and is capable of being detected by the hearing organs. Sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a moving object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium to a human ear. For traffic or stationary noise, the medium of concern is air. Noise is defined as sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or unwanted.

2.2 Frequency and Hertz
A continuous sound is described by its frequency (pitch) and its amplitude (loudness). Frequency relates to the number of pressure oscillations per second. Low-frequency sounds are low in pitch (bass sounding) and high-frequency sounds are high in pitch (squeak). These oscillations per second (cycles) are commonly referred to as Hertz (Hz). The human ear can hear from the bass pitch starting at 20 Hz to the high pitch of 20,000 Hz.

2.3 Sound Pressure Levels and Decibels
The amplitude of a sound determines its loudness. The loudness of sound increases or decreases as the amplitude increases or decreases. Sound pressure amplitude is measured in units of micro-Newton per square meter (µN/m2), also called micro-Pascal (µPa). One µPa is approximately one hundred billionths (0.00000000001) of normal atmospheric pressure. Sound pressure level (SPL or Lp) is used to describe in logarithmic units the ratio of actual sound pressures to a reference pressure squared. These units are called decibels abbreviated dB.

2.4 Addition of Decibels
Because decibels are on a logarithmic scale, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by simple plus or minus addition. When two sounds of equal SPL are combined, they will produce an SPL 3 dB greater than the single SPL. In other words, sound energy that is doubled produces a 3 dB increase.

If two sounds differ by approximately 10 dB, the higher sound level is the predominant sound. When combining sound levels, estimates shown in Table 1 may be utilized.

Table 1: Decibel Addition
When Two Decibel Values Differ by: Add This Amount to Higher Value Example 0 or 1 dB 3 dB 70+69=73 dB
2 or 3 dB 2 dB 74+71=76 dB
4 to 9 dB 1 dB 66+60=67 dB
10 dB or more 0 dB 65+55=65 dB
Source: Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Caltrans, 2013

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3395 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

9 2.5 Human Response to Changes in Noise Levels
In general, the healthy human ear is most sensitive to sounds between 1,000 Hz and 5,000 Hz, and it perceives a sound within that range as being more intense than a sound with a higher or lower frequency with the same magnitude. For purposes of this report as well as with most environmental documents, A-scale weighting is typically used and is reported in terms of the A-weighted decibel (dBA). The A-scale was designed to account for the frequency-dependent sensitivity of the human ear.

Typical A-weighted noise levels are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Typical Noise Levels
Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor 110 Rock Band
Jet flyover at 1,000 feet
100
Gas lawnmower at 3 feet
90 Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph Food blender at 3 feet 80 Garbage disposal at 3 feet
Noisy urban area, daytime
Gas lawnmower, 100 feet 70 Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet
Commercial area Normal speech at 3 feet
Heavy traffic at 300 feet 60
Large Business Office
Quiet urban daytime 50 Dishwasher in next room

Quiet urban nighttime 40 Theater, large conference room (background) Quiet suburban nighttime
30 Library
Quiet rural nighttime Bedroom at night, concert hall (background) 20 Broadcasting/recording studio
10 Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing 0 Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Caltrans, 2013.

In general, the human ear can barely perceive a change in the noise level of 3 dB. As shown in Table 3, a change in 5 dB is readily perceptible, and a change in 10 dB is perceived as being twice or half as loud. As previously discussed, a doubling of sound energy results in a 3 dB increase in sound, which means that a doubling of sound energy (e.g., doubling the volume of traffic on a highway) would result in a barely perceptible change in sound level.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3396 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

10 Table 3: Perceived Changes in Noise Levels
Changes in Intensity Level, dBA Changes in Apparent Loudness 1 Not perceptible
3 Just perceptible
5 Clearly noticeable
10 Twice (or half) as loud
Source: Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Caltrans, 2013.

2.6 Noise Descriptors
Noise in our daily environment fluctuates over time. Some noise levels occur in regular patterns, and others are random. Some noise levels are constant, while others are sporadic. Noise descriptors were created to describe the different time-varying noise levels.

A-Weighted Sound Level: The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very highfrequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical method of rating human judgment of loudness.

Ambient Noise Level: The composite of noise from all sources, near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.

Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after the addition of five (5) decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 to 10:00 PM and after the addition of ten (10) decibels to sound levels in the night between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM.

Decibel (dB): A unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micro-pascals.
dBA: A-weighted sound level (see definition above).

Equivalent Sound Level (LEQ): The sound level corresponding to a steady noise level over a given sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time-varying noise level. The energy average noise level during the sample period.

Habitable Room: Any room meeting the requirements of the California Building Code or other applicable regulations which is intended to be used for sleeping, living, cooking, or dining purposes, excluding such enclosed spaces as closets, pantries, bath or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms, and similar spaces.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3397 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

11 L(n): The A-weighted sound level exceeded during a certain percentage of the sample time. For example, L10 in the sound level exceeded 10 percent of the sample time. Similarly, L50, L90, L99, etc.

Noise: Any unwanted sound or sound which is undesirable because it interferes with speech and hearing, is intense enough to damage hearing, or is otherwise annoying. The State Noise Control Act defines noise as "...excessive undesirable sound...".

Outdoor Living Area: Outdoor spaces that are associated with residential land uses typically used for passive recreational activities or other noise-sensitive uses. Such spaces include patio areas, barbecue areas, jacuzzi areas, etc. associated with residential uses; outdoor patient recovery or resting areas associated with hospitals, convalescent hospitals, or rest homes; outdoor areas associated with places of worship which have a significant role in services or other noise-sensitive activities; and outdoor school facilities routinely used for educational purposes which may be adversely impacted by noise.

Outdoor areas usually not included in this definition are: front yard areas, driveways, greenbelts, maintenance areas and storage areas associated with residential land uses; exterior areas at hospitals that are not used for patient activities; outdoor areas associated with places of worship and principally used for short-term social gatherings; and, outdoor areas associated with school facilities that are not typically associated with educational uses prone to adverse noise impacts (for example, school play yard areas).

Percent Noise Levels: See L(n).

Sound Level (Noise Level): The weighted sound pressure level obtained by use of a sound level meter having a standard frequency filter for attenuating part of the sound spectrum.

Sound Level Meter: An instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and frequency weighting networks for the measurement and determination of noise and sound levels.

Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL): The dBA level which, if it lasted for one second, would produce the same A-weighted sound energy as the actual event.

2.7 Tonal Sounds
A pure tone sound is a sound produced at or near a single frequency. Laboratory tests have shown that humans are more perceptible to changes in sound levels of a pure tone. For a noise source to contain a “pure tone,” there must be a significantly higher A-weighted sound energy in a given frequency band than in the neighboring bands, thereby causing the noise source to “stand out” against other noise sources. A pure tone occurs if the sound pressure level in the one-third octave band with the tone exceeds the average of the sound pressure levels of the two contagious one-third octave bands by 5 dB for center frequencies of 500 Hertz (Hz) and above; by 8 dB for center frequencies between 160 and 400 Hz; and by 15 dB for center frequencies of 125 Hz or less.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3398 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

12 2.8 Sound Propagation
As sound propagates from a source it spreads geometrically. Sound from a small, localized source (i.e., a point source) radiates uniformly outward as it travels away from the source in a spherical pattern.

The sound level attenuates at a rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance. The movement of vehicles down a roadway makes the source of the sound appear to propagate from a line (i.e., line source) rather than a point source. This line source results in the noise propagating from a roadway in a cylindrical spreading versus a spherical spreading that results from a point source. The sound level attenuates for a line source at a rate of 3 dB per doubling of distance.

Research has demonstrated that atmospheric conditions can have a significant effect on noise levels when noise receivers are located 200 feet or more from a noise source. Wind, temperature, air humidity, and turbulence can further impact have far sound can travel.

2.9 Ground Absorption
As noise propagates from the source, it is affected by the ground and atmosphere. Noise models use hard site (reflective surfaces) and soft site (absorptive surfaces) to help calculate predicted noise levels.

Hard site conditions assume no excessive ground absorption between the noise source and the receiver. Soft site conditions such as grass, soft dirt, or landscaping attenuate noise at a rate of 1.5 dB per doubling of distance. When added to the geometric spreading, the excess ground attenuation results in an overall noise attenuation of 4.5 dB per doubling of distance for a line source and 7.5 dB per doubling of distance for a point source.

2.10 Sound Attenuation
Noise-related land use issues are typically composed of three basic elements: (1) the noise source, (2) a transmission path, and (3) a receiver.

The appropriate acoustical treatment for a given project should consider the nature of the noise source and the sensitivity of the receiver. When the potential for a noise-related problem is present, either avoidance of the noise-related problem or noise control techniques should be selected to provide an acceptable noise environment for the receiver while remaining consistent with local aesthetic standards and practical structural and economic limits. Fundamental noise control options are described below.

2.10.1 Noise Barriers
Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by 10 to 15 dBA, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. To achieve that reduction, the barrier be high enough and long enough to block the line-of-sight of the vehicles on the road. A noise barrier can still achieve a 5 dBA noise level reduction when it is tall enough to barely allow a line-of-sight of the vehicles. A noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or receiver. When the noise barrier is an earthen berm instead of a wall, the noise attenuation can be increased by another 3 dBA.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3399 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

13 2.10.2 Setbacks
Noise exposure may be reduced by increasing the setback distance between the noise source and the receiving use. Setback areas can take the form of open space, frontage roads, recreational areas, and storage yards. The available noise attenuation from this technique is limited by the characteristics of the noise source but generally ranges between 4 and 6 dBA.

2.10.3 Site Design
Buildings can be placed on a property to shield other structures or areas affected by noise and to prevent an increase in noise levels caused by reflections. The use of one building to shield another can significantly reduce overall noise control costs, particularly if the shielding structure is insensitive to noise. An example would be placing a detached garage nearest the noise source to shield the house or backyard. Site design should guard against creating reflecting surfaces that may increase onsite noise levels. For example, two buildings placed at an angle facing a noise source may cause noise levels within that angle to increase by up to 3 dBA. The open end of U-shaped buildings should point away from noise sources for the same reason. Landscaping walls or noise barriers located within a development may inadvertently reflect noise to a noise-sensitive area unless carefully located.

2.10.4 Building Facades
When interior noise levels are of concern in a noisy environment, noise reduction may be obtained through the acoustical design of building facades. Standard construction practices provide a noise reduction of 10–15 dBA for building facades with open windows, and a noise reduction of approximately 25 dBA when windows are closed (Table 4). An exterior-to-interior noise reduction of 25 dBA can be obtained by requiring that building design include adequate ventilation systems, which would allow windows facing a noise source to remain closed, even during periods of excessively warm weather.

Where greater noise reduction is required, acoustical treatment of the building facade may be necessary. Reducing relative window area is the most effective control technique, followed by providing acoustical glazing (e.g., thicker glass or increased air space between panes) within frames with low air infiltration rates, using fixed (i.e., non-movable) acoustical glazing, or eliminating windows.

Noise transmitted through walls can be reduced by increasing wall mass (e.g., using stucco or brick in lieu of wood siding), or isolating wall members by using double or staggered stud walls, while noise transmitted through doorways can be lessened by reducing door area, using solid-core doors, or sealing door perimeters with suitable gaskets. Noise-reducing roof treatments include using plywood sheathing under roofing materials.

Table 4: Noise Reduction Afforded by Common Building Construction Construction
Type Typical Occupancy General Description Range of Noise Reduction (dB)1 1 Residential, Commercial,
Schools
Wood frame, stucco, or wood sheathing
exterior. Interior drywall or plaster. Sliding glass 15-20

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3400 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Fundamentals of Noise

14 Table 4: Noise Reduction Afforded by Common Building Construction windows, with windows partially open.
2 Same as 1 above Same as 1 above, but with windows closed. 25-30 3 Commercial, Schools Same as 1 above, but with fixed 0.25-inch plate glass windows. 30-35
4 Commercial, Industrial
Steel or concrete frame, curtain wall, or
masonry exterior wall. Fixed 0.25-inch plate
glass windows.
35-40
Source: California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, 2002.

2.10.5 Landscaping
While the use of trees and other vegetation is often thought to provide significant noise attenuation, approximately 100 feet of dense foliage – with no visual path extending through the foliage – is required to achieve a 5 dBA attenuation of traffic noise. Thus, the use of vegetation as a noise barrier is not considered a practical method of noise control unless large tracts of dense foliage are part of the existing landscape.

Vegetation can be used, however, to acoustically “soften” intervening ground between a noise source and a receiver, increasing ground absorption of sound, and thus, increasing the attenuation of sound with distance. Planting trees and shrubs also offers aesthetic and psychological value, and it may reduce adverse public reaction to a noise source by removing the source from view, even though noise levels would be largely unaffected.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3401 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Ground-Borne Vibration Fundamentals

15 3.0 Ground-Borne Vibration Fundamentals

3.1 Vibration Descriptors
Ground-borne vibrations consist of rapidly fluctuating motions within the ground that have an average motion of zero. The effects of ground-borne vibrations typically only cause a nuisance to people, but at extreme vibration levels, damage to buildings may occur. Although ground-borne vibration can be felt outdoors, it is typically only an annoyance to people indoors where the associated effects of the shaking of a building can be notable. Ground-borne noise is an effect of ground-borne vibration and mainly exists indoors since it is produced from noise radiated from the motion of the walls and floors of a room and may also consist of the rattling of windows or dishes on shelves. Several different methods are used to quantify vibration amplitude. Typical human reaction and effect on buildings due to ground-borne vibration is shown in Table 5. Exhibit F illustrates common vibration sources and the human and structural responses to ground-borne vibration PPV – Known as the peak particle velocity (PPV) which is the maximum instantaneous peak in vibration velocity, typically given in inches per second.

RMS – Known as root mean squared (RMS) can be used to denote vibration amplitude VdB – A commonly used abbreviation to describe the vibration level (VdB) for a vibration source.

Table 5: Typical Human Reaction and Effect on Buildings Due to Ground-Borne Vibration Vibration Level
Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) Human Reaction Effect on Buildings

0.006–0.019 in/sec Threshold of perception, possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of
any type

0.08 in/sec Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of vibration
to which ruins and ancient monuments
should be subjected

0.10 in/sec Level at which continuous vibration
begins to annoy people
Virtually no risk of “architectural” (i.e.,
not structural) damage to normal
buildings

0.20 in/sec Vibrations annoying to people in
buildings
Threshold at which there is a risk to
“architectural” damage to normal
dwelling – houses with plastered walls
and ceilings

0.4–0.6 in/sec
Vibrations considered unpleasant by
people subjected to continuous
vibrations and unacceptable to some
people walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” damage
and possibly minor structural damage
Source: Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, 2020.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3402 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit F
Typical Ground-Borne Vibration Levels
Ground-Borne Vibration Fundamentals
16 San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3403 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Ground-Borne Vibration Fundamentals

17 3.2 Vibration Perception
Typically, developed areas are continuously affected by vibration velocities of 50 VdB or lower. These continuous vibrations are not noticeable to humans whose threshold of perception is around 65 VdB.

Outdoor sources that may produce perceptible vibrations are usually caused by construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads, while smooth roads rarely produce perceptible ground-borne noise or vibration.

3.3 Vibration Propagation
There are three main types of vibration propagation: surface, compression, and shear waves. Surface waves, or Rayleigh waves, travel along the ground’s surface. These waves carry most of their energy along an expanding circular wave front, similar to ripples produced by throwing a rock into a pool of water. P-waves, or compression waves, are body waves that carry their energy along an expanding spherical wave front. The particle motion in these waves is longitudinal (i.e., in a “push-pull” fashion).

P-waves are analogous to airborne sound waves. S-waves, or shear waves, are also body waves that carry energy along an expanding spherical wave front. However, unlike P-waves, the particle motion is transverse, or side-to-side and perpendicular to the direction of propagation. As vibration waves propagate from a source, the vibration energy decreases in a logarithmic nature and the vibration levels typically decrease by 6 VdB per doubling of the distance from the vibration source. This drop-off rate can vary greatly depending on the soil but has been shown to be effective enough for screening purposes, in order to identify potential vibration impacts that may need to be studied through actual field tests.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3404 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

18 4.0 Regulatory Setting
The proposed project is located in the City of San Jacinto, and noise regulations are addressed through the efforts of various federal, state, and local government agencies. The agencies responsible for regulating noise are discussed below.

4.1 Federal Regulations

4.1.1 Noise Control Act of 1972
The Federal Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC) originally was tasked with implementing the Noise Control Act. However, it was eventually eliminated leaving other federal agencies and committees to develop noise policies and programs. Some examples of these agencies are as follows:
• The Department of Transportation (DOT) assumed a significant role in noise control through its various agencies.
• The Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) regulates noise from aircraft and airports. • The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulates noise from the interstate highway system.
• The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for the prohibition of excessive noise exposure to workers.

The federal government advocates that local jurisdiction use their land use regulatory authority to arrange new development in such a way that “noise sensitive” uses are either prohibited from being constructed adjacent to a highway or that the developments are planned and constructed in such a manner that potential noise impacts are minimized.

Since the federal government has preempted the setting of standards for noise levels that can be emitted by the transportation source, the City is restricted to regulating the noise generated by the transportation system through nuisance abatement Codes and land use planning.

The intent of a General Plan Noise Element is to set goals to limit and reduce the effects of noise intrusion and to set acceptable noise levels for varying types of land uses. To this end, the City has the authority to set land use noise standards and restrict private activities that generate excessive or intrusive noise. However, it should be recognized that the City does not have the authority to regulate all sources of noise within the City and various other agencies may supersede City authority. The following is a summary of some federal agency requirements that apply to noise within the Study Area.

4.1.2 Federal Highway Administration
Federal Highway Administration State routes and freeways that run through the City are subject to Federal funding and, as such, are under the purview of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

The FHWA has developed noise standards that are typically used for Federally funded roadway projects or projects that require either Federal or Caltrans review. These noise standards are based on Leq and L10 values and are included in Table 6, FHWA Design Noise Levels.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3405 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

19 Table 6: FHWA Design Noise Levels
Design Noise Levels1
Activity Category Description of Category Leq (dBA) L10 (dBA) A
Lands on which serenity and quiet are of
extraordinary significance and serve an
important public need and where the
preservation of those qualities is essential if the
area is to continue to serve its intended purpose.

Examples include natural parks or wildlife
habitats.
57 (exterior) 60 (exterior)
B
Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds,
active sports areas, parks, residences, motels,
hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals.
67 (exterior) 70 (exterior)
C Developed lands, properties, or activities not
included in Categories A or B, above. 72 (exterior) 75 (exterior) D Undeveloped lands.

E
Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting
rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals,
and auditoriums.
52 (interior) 55 (interior)
Source: FHWA Noise Standard. 23 Code of Federal Regulations 772.

Notes: Either Leq or L10 (but not both) design noise levels may be used on a project.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issues formal requirements related specifically to standards for exterior noise levels along with policies for approving HUD-supported or assisted housing projects in high noise areas. In general, these requirements established three zones.

These include:
• 65 dBA Ldn or less - an acceptable zone where all projects could be approved, • Exceeding 65 dBA Ldn but not exceeding 75 dBA Ldn - a normally unacceptable zone where mitigation measures would be required, and each project would have to be individually evaluated for approval or denial. These measures must provide 5 dBA of attenuation above the attenuation provided by standard construction required in a 65 to 70 dBA Ldn area and 10 dBA of attenuation in a 70 to 75 dBA Ldn area, and
• Exceeding 75 dBA Ldn - an unacceptable zone in which projects would not, as a rule, be approved.

4.1.3 The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise
The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) developed guidance for the assessment of project-generated increases in noise levels that consider the ambient noise level. The FICON recommendations are based on studies of the percentage of persons highly annoyed by aircraft noise.

These recommendations are often used for different types of environmental noise such as traffic noise.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3406 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

20 A readily perceptible 5 dBA or greater project-related noise level increase is considered a significant impact when the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded. In areas where the existing noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA Ldn, a 3 dBA barely perceptible noise level increase is considered significant.

When the existing noise levels already exceed 65 dBA Ldn, any increase in community noise louder than 1.5 dBA or greater is considered a significant impact since it likely contributes to an existing noise exposure exceedance.

4.2 State Regulations

4.2.1 California Department of Health Services
The California Department of Health Services (DHS) Office of Noise Control studied the correlation between noise levels and their effects on various land uses. As a result, the DHS established four categories for judging the severity of noise intrusion on specified land uses. These categories are presented in the State Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure table (California Office of Noise Control, 2017). As part of the 2040 General Plan update, the City has adopted a slightly modified version of this table as a planning tool. This table is discussed further and presented in Section 4.3.1.

4.2.2 Title 24 of the California Building Code
Section 1206.4 of the California Building Code (2019), Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 12 (Interior Environment), establishes an interior noise criterion of 45 dBA CNEL for “dwelling units”. Per California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 2 (Definitions), a residential dwelling unit is intended to be used as a residence that is primarily long-term in nature. Residential dwelling units do not include transient lodging, inpatient medical care, licensed long-term care, and detention or correctional facilities.

California Building Code (2019), Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 5 (Nonresidential Mandatory Measures), applies to all proposed buildings that people may occupy but are not residential dwelling units, with the exception of factories, stadiums, storage, enclosed parking structures, and utility buildings. Section

5.507.4.1 requires wall and roof-ceiling assemblies exposed to the noise source making up the building, or addition envelope or altered envelope, shall meet a composite Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of at least 50 or a composite Outdoor to Indoor Transmission Class (OITC) rating of no less than 40, with exterior windows of a minimum STC of 40 or OITC of 30.

4.3 City of San Jacinto
Existing planning policies and noise regulations applicable to noise within the City of San Jacinto are presented in the Noise Element of the City of San Jacinto General Plan and within the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code. Applicable goals, policies, and regulations are presented below.

4.3.1 City of San Jacinto General Plan
The primary noise sources in the study area are transportation noise and stationary noise sources.

Transportation noise refers to noise from automobile use, trucking, and nearby airport operations.

Typical stationary noise sources include but are not limited to HVAC Systems, Pump Stations, Cooling

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3407 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

21 Table 7: PS-1 Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure (dBA, CNEL)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3408 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

22 Towers/Evaporative Condensers, Lift Stations, Emergency Generators, Boilers, Steam Valves, Steam Turbines, Generator, Fans, Air Compressors, Heavy Equipment, Conveyor Systems, Transformers, Pile Drivers, Grinders, Drill Rigs, Gas or Diesel Motors, Welders, Cutting Equipment, Outdoor Speakers, Blowers and Pneumatic Equipment.

Noise/Land Use Compatibility
Table 7, Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure presents a land use compatibility chart for community noise derived from a similar table originally prepared by the California Office of Noise Control (2017). This table is proposed to be included in the 2040 General Plan Noise Element. The table identifies “normally acceptable,” “conditionally acceptable,” “normally unacceptable,” and “clearly unacceptable” exterior noise levels for various land uses. A “conditionally acceptable” designation implies new construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements for each land use is made and needed noise insulation features are incorporated in the design. By comparison, a “normally acceptable” designation indicates that standard construction can occur with no special noise reduction requirements. While this land use compatibility chart is based on a 24-hour value, the City is aware that some land uses are not occupied on a 24-hour basis, and a descriptor (such as Ldn or CNEL) may be overly restrictive in siting these types of sensitive land uses. Such uses may include but are not limited to, schools, libraries, and churches. In these cases, a more appropriate standard would consider the time of occupancy of the land use. Here, the City recommends the use of a 65 dBA, 12-hour Leq (Leq(12)) that includes those hours of actual use. (If a facility is to be used in excess of 12 hours per day, the CNEL standard should be used.)
General Plan Goals, Policies and Actions
The proposed updated 2040 General Plan Noise Element includes the following goals, policies and actions that are intended to avoid or reduce noise impacts related to transportation, stationary, and construction related noise sources.

Goal PS-1 Noise
A comfortable community environment that is free from excessive noise pollution.

PS-6 Policies
PS-6.1 Noise Exposure. Consider the noise compatibility of existing and future development when making land use planning decisions. Require development and infrastructure projects to be consistent with the land use compatibility standards contained in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 to ensure acceptable noise exposure levels for existing and future development. <Table 8, Next Page>

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3409 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

23 Table 8: PS-2 Allowable Interior Noise Levels Due to Transportation Noise Sources Land Use1 CNEL, dBA Leq. dBA2
Residential 45
Motels/Hotels 45
Mixed-Use 45
Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Assisted Living 45
Theaters, Auditoriums 35
Churches 40
Office Buildings 45
Commercial, Retail 55
Schools, Libraries, Museums 45
Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks --
Industrial 45
Golf Courses, Water Recreation --
Notes:

1. Where a proposed use is not specifically listed, the use shall comply with the standards for the most similar use as determined by the City.

2. Determined for a typical worst-case hour during periods of use.

PS-6.2 Noise Mitigation. Require new development to mitigate excessive noise to the standards indicated in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 to the extent feasible through best practices, including building location and orientation, building design features, placement of noise-generating equipment away from sensitives receptors, shielding of noise-generating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant features between noise sources and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-minimizing materials.

PS-6.3 Acoustical Studies. Require acoustical studies for new discretional developments and transportation improvements that have the potential to affect existing noise-sensitive uses such as schools, hospitals, libraries, care facilities, and residential areas, and for projects that would introduce new noise-sensitive uses into an area where existing noise levels may exceed the thresholds identified in this element. For projects that are required to prepare an acoustical study, the following mobile and stationary noise source criteria shall be used to determine the significance of those impacts.

A. Mobile Noise Sources:

Where existing traffic noise levels are within or below the “normally acceptable” noise criteria at the affected land use (see Table PS-1), a readily perceptible 5 dBA CNEL or greater increase in roadway noise levels will be considered significant; Where existing noise levels fall within the “conditionally acceptable” noise criteria at the affected land use, a barely perceptible 3 dBA CNEL or greater increase in roadway noise levels will be considered significant; and

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3410 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

24 Where existing noise levels exceed the “conditionally acceptable” noise criteria at the affected land use, a 1.5 dBA CNEL or greater increase in roadway noise levels will be considered significant.

B. Stationary and Non-Transportation Noise Sources
A significant impact will occur if the project results in an exceedance of the noise level standards contained in this element, or the project will result in an increase in ambient noise levels by more than 3 dB, whichever is greater.

PS-6.4 Roadway Noise. Encourage nonmotorized transportation alternatives for local trips and the implementation of noise sensitivity measures in the public realm, including traffic-calming road design, lateral separation, natural buffers, and setbacks to decrease excessive motor vehicle noise.

PS-6.5 Vehicular Traffic. Monitor and enforce existing speed limits and motor vehicle codes requiring adequate mufflers on all types of vehicles traveling through the city.

PS-6.6 Commercial Noise. Require the use of noise attenuation measures, including screening and buffering techniques, for all new commercial development expected to produce excessive noise; in existing cases where the City’s noise standards are exceeded, work with Code Enforcement to require compliance.

PS-6.7 Construction Noise. Require construction activities to reduce noise impacts on adjacent uses to the criteria identified in Tables PS-3 and PS-4, or, if the criteria cannot be met, to the maximum extent feasible complying with Chapter 8.40 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code (Noise Control) and best-use practices. Construction activities outside of the permitted construction hours identified in the San Jacinto Municipal Code may be approved on a case-by-case basis by the Director of Community Development.

PS-6.8 Temporary Special Events. Temporary special events including, but not limited to, festivals, concerts, parades, and other similar activities may be allowed to exceed the noise standards established in this General Plan and the standards established by Chapter 8.40 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code (Noise Control) through issuance of a temporary use permit (see Section 17.640 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code (Temporary Use Permits).

PS-6.9 Temporary Emergency Operations and Emergency Equipment Usage. Temporary emergency operations or emergency equipment usage is exempt from the noise standard criteria set by this element.

PS-6.10 Interjurisdictional Coordination. Coordinate with neighboring cities to minimize noise conflicts between land uses along the City's boundaries.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3411 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

25 PS-6 Actions
PS-6a Review Chapter 8.40 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code and update as necessary to ensure that the noise standards are consistent with this General Plan, including Tables PS-3 and PS-4, and to require new residential, mixed-use with a residential component, and other noisesensitive development to be designed to minimize noise exposure to noise sensitive uses through incorporation of site planning and architectural techniques. The update shall also include noise standards for residential uses within a mixed-use development, which may differ from other adopted residential noise standards.

PS-6b Review new development projects for compliance with the noise requirements established in this General Plan, including the standards established in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4. Where necessary, require new development to mitigate excessive noise through best practices, including building location and orientation, building design features, placement of noise-generating equipment away from sensitive receptors, shielding of noise-generating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant features between noise sources and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-minimizing materials such as rubberized asphalt.

PS-6c Require acoustical studies for all new discretionary projects, including those related to development and transportation, which have the potential to generate noise impacts which exceed the standards identified in this General Plan. The studies shall include representative noise measurements, estimates of existing and projected noise levels, and mitigation measures necessary to ensure compliance with this element.

PS-6d Review the locations of proposed projects with the potential to generate stationary noise in relation to sensitive receptors through the discretionary project review process. Limit delivery or service hours for stores and businesses with loading areas, docks, or trash bins that front, side, border, or gain access on driveways next to residential and other noise sensitive areas. Only approve exceptions if full compliance with the nighttime limits of the noise regulations is achieved.

PS-6e Require all construction activity to comply with the limits (maximum noise levels, hours and days of allowed activity) established in the City noise regulations (Title 24 California Code of Regulations, Noise Ordinance) in order to reduce impacts associated with temporary construction noise to the extent feasible. Trucks associated with construction activities shall follow the designated truck routes described in the Mobility Element.

PS-6f Actively enforce the standards identified within the City's Noise Ordinance and Noise Plan in order to reduce impacts to the extent feasible. Update and amend the Noise Ordinance and Plan as appropriate. Provide a link on the City's website for those to file complaints against activities and uses that may be violating the Noise Ordinance.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3412 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

26 PS-6g Require new residential projects located adjacent to railroad lines to follow the FTA vibration screening distance criteria to ensure that residential uses are not exposed to vibration exceeding 72 VdB for frequent events (more than 70 events per day), 75 VdB for occasional events (30-70 events per day), or 80 VdB for infrequent events (less than 30 events per day).

PS-6h Require new development to minimize vibration impacts to adjacent uses during demolition and construction. For sensitive historic structures, a vibration limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV (peak particle velocity) will be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage to the building. A vibration limit of 0.30 in/sec PPV will be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage at buildings of normal conventional construction.

PS-6i During subsequent updates to Section 8.40 of the Municipal Code, review and update Section 8.40.090, Construction Activity Noise Regulations, as needed in order to allow provisions for emergency repairs, exceptional circumstances, and reasonable Sunday construction and maintenance activities, while continuing to achieve the objectives of providing a nuisance-free noise environment.

4.3.3 City of San Jacinto Municipal Code
The Noise Ordinance of the Municipal Code is designed to protect people from non-transportation noise sources such as construction activity; commercial, industrial, and agricultural operations; machinery and pumps; and air conditioners. Enforcement of the ordinance ensures that adjacent properties are not exposed to excessive noise from stationary sources. Enforcing the ordinance includes requiring proposed development projects to show compliance with the ordinance, including operating in accordance with noise levels and hours of operations limits placed on the project site. The City also requires construction activity to comply with established work schedule limits. The ordinance is reviewed periodically for adequacy and amended as needed to address community needs and development patterns.

The City of San Jacinto Noise Ordinance consists of Sections 8.40.010-8.40.210 the City’s Municipal Code includes noise-related definitions, identifies designated noise zones, outlines noise level measurement procedures, identifies exterior and interior noise standards as well as other standards pertaining to noise impacts from one land use to another, and discusses consequences for violation of such standards and options for noise abatement.

Ordinance 8.40.030 categorizes different types of land uses into Noise Zones (Table 9). These zones are to be referred to when interpreting which noise standards apply to any particular situation. Allowable Exterior Noise Level standards are provided in Section 8.40.040 of the Noise Ordinance and are presented in Table 10. Allowable Interior Noise Level standards provided in Section 8.40.050 of the Noise Ordinance and are presented in Table 11.

Section 8.40.060 of the Noise Ordinance identifies certain activities as exempt from the exterior and interior noise standards presented in Tables 10 and 11 including recreational and sporting activities

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3413 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

27 related to public school activities, occasional outdoor gatherings, public dances, shows, and sporting and entertainment events provided that they are conducted pursuant to an approval, authorization, contract, lease, permit or sublease by the appropriate public entity.

Specific Ordinances are provided to control noise associated with construction activities, property maintenance, agricultural activities, ice cream trucks, barking dogs and other animal noise, construction noise, sound amplifying equipment, heating, venting, pool/spa and air conditioning, motor vehicles, and other agency generated noise. The construction noise criteria presented in Section

8.40.090 are specifically pertinent to this analysis of the development of the proposed land-use plan.

The Community Development Department and Police Department cooperate to identify development or activities that violate the noise regulations. The City's Municipal Code gives the City the authority to enforce the noise standards through penalties and other abatement tactics. Noise generated by new development is effectively controlled through the site design review process, compliance with CEQA, and compliance with the City noise standards contained in this Noise Element and the Noise Ordinance of the Municipal Code. During these preliminary stages in the development process, potential noise impacts shall be identified, and mitigation measures can be imposed, as appropriate. When reviewing proposed non-residential projects, noise generation and potential impacts to surrounding development are considered. An acoustical analysis is required for projects that will generate noise potentially affecting sensitive receptors. Where significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be required.

Table 9: Designated Noise Zones
Noise Zone I All single-family residential properties
Noise Zone II All multifamily residential properties and mobile home parks Noise Zone III All commercial property
Noise Zone IV The residential portion of mixed-use properties Noise Zone V All manufacturing or industrial properties and all other uses Source: City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Section 8.40.030 <Table 10, next page>

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3414 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

28 Table 10: PS-3 Allowable Exterior Noise Level1 Due to Stationary Noise Sources Type of Land Use
Allowed Equivalent Noise Level, dBA Leq2
7:00 AM to 10:00 PM 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM
Single-Family Residential 65 45
Multi-Family Residential and Mobile Home Parks 65 50
Commercial Property 65 60
Residential Portion of Mixed Use 70 70
Manufacturing and Industrial, Other Uses 70 70
Source: City of San Jacinto Municipal Code 8.40.040
Notes:

1. If the ambient noise level exceeds the resulting standard, the ambient noise level shall be the standard.

2. Measurements for compliance are made on the affected property pursuant to Municipal Code Section 8.40.160.

3. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the city to create noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which noise causes the noise level, when measured at any location on any other property, to exceed either of the following:
a. The noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen (15) minute period; b. A maximum instantaneous (single instance) noise level equal to the value of the noise standard plus twenty (20) dBA for any period of time (measured using A-weighted slow response).

4. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard, the maximum allowable noise level under such category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level.

5. The residential portion of mixed-use standard shall apply to that portion of residential property falling within one hundred (100) feet of a commercial property or use if the noise originates from that commercial property or use.

6. If the measurement location is on a boundary between two different noise zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply.

Table 11: PS-4 Allowable Interior Noise Level1 Due to Stationary Noise Sources Type of Land Use
Allowed Equivalent Noise Level, dBA Leq2
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

Single-Family Residential 45 40
Multi-Family Residential and Mobile Home Parks 45 40
Commercial Property 45 40
Residential Portion of Mixed Use 45 40
Source: City of San Jacinto Municipal Code 8.40.050
Notes:
1 If the ambient noise level exceeds the resulting standard, the ambient noise level shall be the standard.

2. Measurements for compliance are made on the affected property pursuant to Municipal Code Section 8.40.160.

4. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard, the maximum allowable noise level under such category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level.

6. If the measurement location is on a boundary between two different noise zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3415 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

29 Section 8.40.090 – Construction Activity Noise Regulations of the Municipal Code exempts construction activities from compliance with the noise standards presented in Tables 10 and 11 as long as the activities comply with the following criteria:

Weekdays and Saturdays. No person shall engage in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, or any other related building activity, nor shall operate any tool, equipment or machine, on any weekday or Saturday except between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m.

Sundays and Holidays. No person shall engage in construction, remodeling, grading, demolition, or other related building activity, nor shall operate any tool, equipment, or machine, on any Sunday or any federal holiday.

No landowner, construction company owner, contractor, subcontractor, or employer shall permit or allow any person or persons working under their direction and control to operate any tool, equipment, or machine in violation of the provisions of this section.

Exceptions.

1. The provisions of this section shall not apply to emergency construction work performed by a private party when authorized by the city manager or his or her designee;

2. The maintenance, repair, or improvement of any public work or facility by public employees, by any person or persons acting pursuant to a public works contract, or by any person or persons performing such work or pursuant to the direction of, or on behalf of, any public agency; provided, however, this exception shall not apply to the city of San Jacinto, or its employees, contractors, or agents, unless:
a. The City manager or a department head determines that the maintenance, repair, or improvement is immediately necessary to maintain public services, or b. The maintenance, repair, or improvement is of a nature that cannot feasibly be conducted during normal business hours, or
c. The City Council has approved project specifications, contract provisions, or an environmental document that specifically authorizes construction during hours of the day that would otherwise be prohibited pursuant to this section;

3. Any construction that complies with the noise limits specified in Section 8.40.040 or 8.40.050.

Section 8.40.070 establishes qualitative criteria for assessing noise impacts by making it unlawful for any person or property owner within the City to make, cause or allow to be made any loud, excessive, impulsive, or intrusive noise, disturbance, or commotion that disturbs the peace and quiet of any area or that causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivities in the area.

The types of loud, disturbing excessive, impulsive, or intrusive noise may include, but shall not be

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3416 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Regulatory Setting

30 limited to, yelling, shouting, hootings, whistling, singing, playing a musical instrument, or emitting or transmitting any loud music or noise from any mechanical or electrical sound-making or soundamplifying device.

The factors, standards, and conditions that may be considered in determining whether a violation of the provisions of this section has been committed include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. The level of the noise;

2. The level and intensity of the background (ambient) noise, if any;

3. The proximity of the noise to residential or commercial sleeping areas;

4. The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise emanates;

5. The density of inhabitation of the area within which the noise emanates;

6. The time of day and night the noise occurs;

7. The duration of the noise;

8. Whether the noise is constant, recurrent, or intermittent;

9. Whether the noise is produced by a commercial or noncommercial activity;

10. Whether the use is lawful under the provisions of this code and whether the noise could reasonably be expected from the activity or allowed use.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3417 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Study Method and Procedure

31 5.0 Study Method and Procedure
The following section describes the noise modeling procedures and assumptions used for this assessment.

5.1 Noise Measurement Procedure and Criteria
Noise measurements are taken to determine the existing noise levels. A noise receiver or receptor is any location in the noise analysis in which noise might produce an impact. The following criteria are used to select measurement locations and receptors:
 Locations expected to receive the highest noise impacts, such as the first row of houses  Locations that are acoustically representative and equivalent of the area of concern  Human land usage
 Sites clear of major obstruction and contamination
MD conducted the sound level measurements in accordance with the City and Caltrans technical noise specifications. All measurements equipment meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for sound level meters (S1.4-1983 identified in Chapter 19.68.020.AA). The following gives a brief description of the Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement procedures for sound level measurements:
 Microphones for sound level meters were placed 5-feet above the ground for all measurements  Sound level meters were calibrated before and after each measurement  Following the calibration of equipment, a windscreen was placed over the microphone  Frequency weighting was set on “A” and slow response
 Results of the long-term noise measurements were recorded on field data sheets  During any short-term noise measurements, any noise contaminations such as barking dogs, local traffic, lawnmowers, or aircraft flyovers were noted  Temperature and sky conditions were observed and documented

5.2 SoundPLAN Noise Modeling
SoundPLAN acoustical modeling software was utilized to create existing and existing plus project plus cumulative traffic noise level contours for all General Plan designated roadways. Model parameters included average daily traffic volumes, day/evening/night split, roadway classification, width, speed, and truck mix. Surfaces adjacent to all modeled roadways were assumed to have a “hard site” to predict worst-case, conservative noise levels. A hard site, such as pavement, is highly reflective and does not attenuate noise as quickly as grass or other soft sites. Possible reductions in noise levels due to intervening topography and buildings were not accounted for in this analysis. Roadway modeling assumptions utilized for the technical study are provided in Table 12 (Existing Conditions) and Table 13 (2040 Future Conditions), and in Appendix A.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3418 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Study Method and Procedure

32 A summary of the model parameters and REMEL adjustments are presented below.  Roadway classification – (e.g., freeway, major arterial, arterial, secondary, collector, etc.),  Roadway Active Width – (distance between the center of the outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway)
 Average Daily Traffic Volumes (ADT), Travel Speeds, Percentages of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks
 Roadway grade and angle of view
 Site Conditions (e.g., soft vs. hard)
 Percentage of total ADT which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period

5.3 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model
The FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) was utilized to model and to compare existing traffic noise levels to 2040 Future noise levels. The FHWA model arrives at the predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). Roadway modeling assumptions utilized for the technical study are provided in Table 12 (Existing Conditions) and Table 13 (2040 Future Conditions) indicates the roadway parameters and vehicle distribution utilized for this study. The vehicle mix indicates the percentage of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks for each segment and is presented as auto/medium/heavy.

Table 12: Existing Conditions Roadway Noise Modeling Parameters Roadway Segment Limits Existing
ADT1
Vehicle
Mix1,2
Speed3
(MPH)
Existing
Roadway4
Existing GP
Classification4
Cottonwood Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 5,300 90/7/3 50 2D Urban Arterial Cottonwood Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 6,750 90/7/3 50 2D Arterial Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 6,750 90/7/3 45 2U Arterial Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave to State St 6,750 90/7/3 45 2U Arterial Esplanade Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 5,800 98/2/0 40 2U Major Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 6,800 98/2/0 40 2U Major Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 9,550 98/2/0 40 2U Major Esplanade Ave Lyon Ave to State St 13,350 98/2/0 45 4D Major Esplanade Ave State St to San Jacinto Ave 18,400 98/2/0 45 4D Major Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 15,150 98/2/0 45 4D Major Esplanade Ave Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 9,550 98/2/0 45 4D Major Main St Ramona Exwy to Soboba Road 8,650 96/4/0 40 4D Secondary Ramona Exwy West of Warren Road 22,200 97/2/1 55 2U Freeway Ramona Exwy Warren Road to Sanderson Ave 23,750 97/2/1 65 4D Freeway Ramona Exwy Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 27,050 97/2/1 65 6D LACH Ramona Exwy Lyon Ave to State St 25,050 97/2/1 55 6D LACH

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3419 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Study Method and Procedure

33 Roadway Segment Limits Existing
ADT1
Vehicle
Mix1,2
Speed3
(MPH)
Existing
Roadway4
Existing GP
Classification4
Ramona Exwy State St to San Jacinto Ave 20,150 97/2/1 55 4D LACH Ramona Exwy San Jacinto Ave to Main St 10,850 90/7/3 65 4D Urban Arterial Ramona Exwy Main St to 7th St 11,000 90/7/3 55 2D Urban Arterial Ramona Exwy 7th St to Esplanade Ave 11,000 90/7/3 55 2D Urban Arterial Ramona Exwy Esplanade Ave to Hemet St 16,250 90/7/3 55 2U Urban Arterial San Jacinto Ave Main St to 7th St 12,650 98/2/0 40 2D Major San Jacinto Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 18,600 98/2/0 40 4U Major San Jacinto Ave South of Esplanade Ave 21,546 98/2/0 40 4D Major Sanderson Ave Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 23,515 90/7/3 55 4D Urban Arterial Sanderson Ave Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 23,515 90/7/3 55 4D Urban Arterial Sanderson Ave Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 28,500 90/7/3 55 4D Urban Arterial Sanderson Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 6,700 90/7/3 55 4D Urban Arterial 7 th St Warren Ave to Sanderson Ave 9,650 96/4/0 45 2U Secondary 7 th St Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 6,300 96/4/0 45 4D Secondary 7 th St Lyon Ave to State St 9,650 96/4/0 45 2D Secondary 7 th St State St to San Jacinto Ave 11,200 96/4/0 30 4D Secondary 7 th St San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 8,500 96/4/0 30 2D Secondary 7 th St Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 9,550 96/4/0 25 2U Secondary State St College Entrance to Community Coll. 14,950 98/2/0 45 2U Major State St Community College to Ramona Exwy 16,650 98/2/0 45 2D Major State St Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 22,050 98/2/0 45 4D Major State St Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 19,650 98/2/0 45 4D Major State St Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 5,550 98/2/0 45 4D Major State St 7th St to Esplanade Ave 6,700 98/2/0 45 4D Major State St South of Esplanade Ave 19,520 98/2/0 45 4D Major Warren Road Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave 11,778 90/7/3 55 2U Arterial Notes:
1) Derived from turn counts, and vehicle mix provided in TIA for City of San Jacinto General Plan, Kittleson Associates, 2021; County of Riverside Vehicle Counts (WEB COUNTS (rctlma.org); Baypoint Preparatory Academy TIA, June 26, 2018; and San Jacinto Retail Center TIA, May 15, 2018. 2) % of Automobiles/Medium Trucks/Heavy Trucks.
3) Speed was modeled as posted.
4) Existing roadway configuration: 2U = two-lane undivided, 2D = two-lane divided, 4U = four-land divided, 4D = four-lane divided, 6D = six-lane divided, LACH = Limited Access Conventional Highway.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3420 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Study Method and Procedure

34 Table 13: 2040 Future Conditions Roadway Noise Modeling Parameters Roadway Segment Limits
2040
Future
ADT1
Vehicle
Mix2
Speed3
(MPH)
2040 GP
Roadway
Classification4
Cottonwood Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 12,438 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4U Cottonwood Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 12,438 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4U Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 12,438 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4U Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave to State St 12,438 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4U Esplanade Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Esplanade Ave Lyon Ave to State St 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Esplanade Ave State St to San Jacinto Ave 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Esplanade Ave Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 14,997 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Main St Ramona Exwy to Soboba Road 18,986 90/7/3 40 Arterial 4D Ramona Exwy West of Warren Road 34,141 97/2/1 65 LAH 6D Ramona Exwy Warren Road to Sanderson Ave 34,141 97/2/1 65 LAH 6D Ramona Exwy Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 34,141 97/2/1 65 LAH 6D Ramona Exwy Lyon Ave to State St 34,141 97/2/1 65 LAH 6D Ramona Exwy State St to San Jacinto Ave 46,217 90/7/3 65 Arterial 6D Ramona Exwy San Jacinto Ave to Main St 46,217 90/7/3 65 Arterial 6D Ramona Exwy Main St to 7th St 46,217 90/7/3 65 Arterial 6D Ramona Exwy 7th St to Esplanade Ave 46,217 90/7/3 65 Arterial 6D Ramona Exwy Esplanade Ave to Hemet St 10,787 90/7/3 65 Arterial 6D San Jacinto Ave Main St to 7th St 25,700 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4D San Jacinto Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 25,700 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4D San Jacinto Ave South of Esplanade Ave 25,700 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4D Sanderson Ave Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 22,568 90/7/3 55 Arterial 4D Sanderson Ave Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 22,568 90/7/3 55 Arterial 4D Sanderson Ave Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 22,568 90/7/3 55 Arterial 4D Sanderson Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 22,568 90/7/3 55 Arterial 4D 7th St West of Sanderson Ave 9,667 98/2/0 45 Major 4D
7th St Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 9,667 98/2/0 45 Major 4D 7th St Lyon Ave to State St 9,667 98/2/0 45 Major 4D
7th St State St to San Jacinto Ave 9,667 98/2/0 30 Major 4D 7th St San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 9,667 98/2/0 30 Major 4D 7th St Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 9,667 98/2/0 25 Major 4D State St College Entrance to Community Coll. 26,714 90/7/3 45 Arterial 4D

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3421 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Study Method and Procedure

35 Roadway Segment Limits
2040
Future
ADT1
Vehicle
Mix2
Speed3
(MPH)
2040 GP
Roadway
Classification4
State St Comm College to Ramona Exwy 26,714 98/2/0 45 Arterial 4D State St Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 37,777 98/2/0 45 Arterial 4D State St Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 37,777 98/2/0 45 Arterial 4D State St Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 37,777 98/2/0 45 Arterial 4D State St 7th St to Esplanade Ave 37,777 98/2/0 45 Arterial 4D State St South of Esplanade Ave 25,912 98/2/0 45 Arterial 4D Warren Road Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave 5,372 90/7/3 55 Arterial 4D Notes:
1) Traffic Study for the San Jacinto General Plan, Kittleson Associates, 2021. 2) % of Automobiles/Medium Trucks/Heavy Trucks
3) Speed was modeled per County of Riverside Modeling Standards. 4) Existing roadway configuration: 4U four land undivided, 4D = four lane divided, and 6D = six land divided. LAH = Limited Access Highway.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3422 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Existing Noise Environment

36 6.0 Existing Noise Environment

6.1 Noise Sources in the Study Area

6.1.1 General Land Use Noise
Existing land uses within the Study Area include single and multiple-family residential development, commercial, recreational, institutional, and industrial land uses. Noise sources associated with existing land uses include residential maintenance, parking lot noise, heating, and cooling system (HVAC) noise, property maintenance noise, trash truck noise, loading and unloading noise, and recreational noise.

6.1.2 Roadway Noise

6.2 Existing Noise Measurements
Six (6) long-term 24-hour noise measurements and seven (7) short-term 10-minute noise measurements were conducted throughout the Study Area to document the existing noise environment. Noise measurement locations are shown in Exhibit G.

6.2.1 Short-Term Noise Measurements
Seven short-term noise measurements (10-minute) were taken in order to document the daytime Leq level at different locations throughout the Study Area. Measured noise levels ranged between 67.3 and

75.7 dBA Leq. Vehicle noise associated with Ramona Expressway and other surface Streets were the primary sources of ambient noise. Secondary noise sources included typical residential activities and landscaping equipment. Noise measurement results are presented in Table 14. Field notes and meter output are provided in Appendix B.

Table 14: Short-Term Noise Measurement Summary
Noise
Measurement
Location
Approximate
Location Date Time
A-Weighted Sound Level (dBA)
Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50
ST1 Warren Rd/Byrd St 05/07/19 1:01 PM 75.7 101.6 39.9 81.1 77.9 72.4 64.1 ST2 Palm Ave/7th St 05/07/19 1:27 PM 69.2 88.0 44.6 77.1 74.2 69.6 64.0 ST3 San Jacinto Blvd
/Esplanade Ave 05/07/19 1:49 PM 69.5 87.0 57.2 77.1 71.9 68.8 65.9 ST4 Hewitt St/7th St 05/07/19 2:10 PM 67.3 82.6 54.5 75.2 70.5 66.9 64.7 ST5 Ramona Exp
/Esplanade Ave 05/07/19 2:10 PM 71.6 86.5 54.0 79.4 75.4 72.0 68.2 ST6 Lyon Ave/
De Anza Dr 05/07/19 2:52 PM 69.0 92.2 48.6 77.5 69.5 64.6 61.9 ST7 Oakwood St
/Santa Fe 05/07/19 3:43 PM 68.9 81.4 52.2 76.2 72.8 70.3 65.8 Notes:
dBA = A-weighted decibels, Leq = equivalent noise level, Lmax = maximum noise level, Lmin = minimum noise level, Ln = noise level exceeded n percent of the measurement period, 10-minute duration

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3423 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Existing Noise Environment

37 6.2.2 Long-Term Noise Measurements
Six (6) long-term noise measurements (24 consecutive hours) were taken in order to document the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) at different locations throughout the Study Area. As shown in Table 15, the measured CNEL ranged between 67.9 and 74.6 dBA. The primary noise source was vehicle traffic. Table 15 also outlines the daytime (7 AM to 7 PM), evening (7 PM to 10 PM), and nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) Leq levels at each location. These represent the average level over each time period (day/evening/night). Field notes and meter output are provided in Appendix B.

Table 15: Long-Term Noise Measurement Summary

Noise
Measurement
Location
Approximate
Location Date Description
A-Weighted Sound Level (dBA)
Daytime
Leq
Evening
Leq
Nighttime
Leq CNEL
LT1 Warren Rd
/Ramona Exp 5/7/19-5/8/19 Vehicle noise 67.4 66.5 63.1 70.4 LT2 Sanderson Ave
/Ramona Exp 5/7/19-5/8/19 Vehicle noise 65.6 63.2 60.3 67.9 LT3 Sanderson Ave
/Cottonwood Ave 5/8/19-5/9/19 Vehicle noise 67.8 66.2 64.7 71.7 LT4 State St
/Ramona Exp 5/8/19-5/9/19 Vehicle noise 68.6 65.7 68.1 74.6 LT5 San Jacinto Ave
/7th St 5/8/19-5/9/19 Vehicle noise 66.6 64.3 61.8 69.2 LT6
Hewitt St
/Commonwealth
Ave
5/8/19-5/9/19 Vehicle noise 73.1 69.2 65.4 73.9
Notes:
dBA = A-weighted decibels
Leq = equivalent noise level
Lmax = maximum noise level
Lmin = minimum noise level
Ln = noise level exceeded n percent of the measurement period 24-hour duration

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3424 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit G
Noise Measurement Location Map
Existing Noise Environment
37 x = Long-Term measurement
(24-Hour)
= Short-Term measurement
(10-MInute) x 3 6
2 12 1 2 4
1 San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA 5 3 4 6 5 7

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3425 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Existing Noise Environment

39 6.3 Existing Noise Modeling
The primary source of noise in San Jacinto results from transportation-related noise. The Ramona Expressway, Sanderson Avenue, and Warren Avenue, along with other major roadways create ambient noise levels that affect the overall quality of life in the community. Modeled existing noise levels provided in Table 16 and on Exhibit H, confirm that there are currently sensitive land uses in the project area that are exposed to noise levels that reach up to 70 dBA CNEL.

It should be noted that the modeled noise contours do not take into account factors such as existing buildings, walls, etc. that may reduce or in some cases, amplify noise sources. Measured noise levels provided in Tables 14 and 15, do take into account existing structures as well as other noise sources.

Those areas in the City that currently experience sound levels greater than 65 dBA CNEL are typically near major vehicular traffic corridors. Highway traffic noise levels typically depend on three factors: (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the average speed of traffic, and (3) the vehicle mix (i.e., the percentage of trucks versus automobiles in the traffic flow). Vehicle noise includes noises produced by the engine, exhaust, tires, and wind generated by taller vehicles. Other factors that affect the perception of traffic noise include the distance from the highway, terrain, vegetation, and natural and structural obstacles.

While tire noise from automobiles is generally located at ground level, some truck noise sources may emanate from 12 feet or more above the ground.

Table 16: Existing Exterior Noise Levels Along Roadways

Roadway

Segment Limits
CNEL, dBA Distance to Contour (feet)
@50 ft 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
Cottonwood Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 69.5 44 139 441 1,393 Cottonwood Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 69.5 44 141 445 1,406 Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 69.5 44 141 445 1,406 Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave to State St 69.5 44 141 445 1,406 Esplanade Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 63.9 12 39 123 390 Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 64.6 14 46 144 457 Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 66.1 20 64 203 641 Esplanade Ave Lyon Ave to State St 69.6 45 144 454 1,436 Esplanade Ave State St to San Jacinto Ave 71.0 63 198 626 1,980 Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 70.1 52 163 515 1,630 Esplanade Ave Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 68.1 32 103 325 1,027 Main St Ramona Exwy to Soboba Road 67.1 26 81 257 812
Ramona Exwy West of Warren Road 75.5 177 561 1,774 5,609 Ramona Exwy Warren Road to Sanderson Ave 78.4 342 1,082 3,420 10,816 Ramona Exwy Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 80.2 527 1,666 5,269 16,662 Ramona Exwy Lyon Ave to State St 78.0 317 1,002 3,168 10,017 Ramona Exwy State St to San Jacinto Ave 75.8 188 596 1,884 5,957

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3426 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Existing Noise Environment

40 Roadway

Segment Limits
CNEL, dBA Distance to Contour (feet)
@50 ft 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
Ramona Exwy San Jacinto Ave to Main St 75.6 181 571 1,806 5,711 Ramona Exwy Main St to 7th St 73.5 111 352 1,114 3,523
Ramona Exwy 7th St to Esplanade Ave 73.5 111 352 1,114 3,523 Ramona Exwy Esplanade Ave to Hemet St 75.1 161 509 1,610 5,090 San Jacinto Ave Main St to 7th St 67.4 27 87 275 869
San Jacinto Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 69.7 46 146 462 1,462 San Jacinto Ave South of Esplanade Ave 70.3 54 169 535 1,693 Sanderson Ave Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 77.4 273 862 2,725 8,619 Sanderson Ave Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 77.4 273 862 2,725 8,619 Sanderson Ave Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 78.2 330 1,045 3,303 10,446 Sanderson Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 71.9 78 246 777 2,456 7th St West of Sanderson Ave 68.2 33 104 328 1,038
7th St Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 67.0 25 79 251 793
7th St Lyon Ave to State St 68.3 34 106 336 1,061
7th St State St to San Jacinto Ave 65.2 17 53 167 527
7th St San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 63.4 11 35 111 350
7th St Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 62.1 8 25 80 254
State St College Entrance to Comm. Coll. 69.4 43 137 435 1,375 State St Community College to Ramona Exwy 69.9 48 153 484 1,531 State St Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 71.8 75 237 750 2,372 State St Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 71.3 67 211 669 2,114 State St Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 65.8 19 60 189 597
State St 7th St to Esplanade Ave 66.6 23 72 228 721
State St South of Esplanade Ave 71.2 66 210 664 2,100
Warren Road Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave 73.7 117 369 1,167 3,689 Notes:

1. Exterior noise levels calculated at 5-feet above ground.

2. Noise levels calculated from centerline of subject roadway.

3. Contour Distances do not take into account potential noise reduction from existing barriers such as buildings, walls or berms as a worst-case scenario for planning screening purposes. Overall levels are likely lower at sensitive receptors.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3427 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit H
40 Existing Noise Environment
Existing Roadway Noise Level Contours (CNEL)
San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3428 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Existing Noise Environment

42 6.3 Airport/Aircraft Noise
There are no airports located within the Study Area and the Study Area is not located within any airport noise contours. The closest airport to the Study Area is the Hemet-Ryan Airport located approximately 2.5 miles south of the Study Area. The noise contours associated with this small airport do not encroach into the Study Area.

6.4 Vibration Sources in the Study Area
The main sources of vibration in the project area are related to vehicles and construction. Typical roadway traffic, including heavy trucks, rarely generates vibration amplitudes high enough to cause structural or cosmetic damage. However, there have been cases in which heavy trucks traveling over potholes or other discontinuities in the pavement have caused vibration high enough to result in complaints from nearby residents. These types of issues typically can be resolved by smoothing the roadway surface (Caltrans 2020).

Construction activities that produce vibration that can be felt by adjacent land uses include the use of vibratory equipment, large bulldozers, and pile drivers. The primary source of vibration during construction is usually from a bulldozer. A large bulldozer has a peak particle velocity of 0.089 inches per second at 25 feet.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3429 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

43 7.0 Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation This assessment analyzes future noise impacts to and from the proposed project and compares the results to the City of San Jacinto General Plan Policies and Noise Standards. The analysis details the estimated noise levels associated with traffic from adjacent roadways and on-site stationary noise sources. Each future noise source related to the project was evaluated in light of applicable City of San Jacinto General Plan policies and ordinances and programmatic mitigation measures are provided as applicable.

7.1 Transportation Noise
The City of San Jacinto is proposing a new Land Use Plan and a new Roadway Classification Map in anticipation of the expected growth in the City (see Exhibits D and E). Table 17 presents Existing Roadway Conditions (on ground), 2006 General Plan Circulation Element Classifications, and 2040 General Plan Circulation Element Classifications for the studied road segments.

Table 17: Existing and Planned Roadway Designations
Roadway Segment Limits Existing
Roadway1
2006 General
Plan Roadway
Classification2
2040 General
Plan Roadway
Classification3
Cottonwood Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave Collector, 2D Arterial, 4D Arterial, 4U Cottonwood Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave Collector, 2D Arterial, 4D Arterial, 4U Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave Collector, 2U Arterial, 4D Arterial, 4U Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave to State St Collector, 2U Arterial, 4D Arterial, 4U Esplanade Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave Collector, 2U Major, 4D Arterial, 4D Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave Collector, 2U Major,4D Arterial, 4D Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave Collector, 2U Major, 4D Arterial, 4D Ramona Exwy West of Warren Road Collector, 2U Freeway LAH4, 6D Ramona Exwy Warren Road to Sanderson Ave Arterial, 4D Freeway LAH, 6D Ramona Exwy Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave LACH, 6D LACH5, 6-8D LAH, 6D Ramona Exwy Lyon Ave to State St Arterial, 6D LACH, 6-8D LAH, 6D Ramona Exwy State St to San Jacinto Ave Arterial, 4D LACH, 6-8D Arterial, 6D Ramona Exwy San Jacinto Ave to Main St Arterial, 4D Urban Arterial, 6D Arterial, 6D Ramona Exwy Main St to 7th St Arterial, 4D Urban Arterial, 6D Arterial, 6D Ramona Exwy 7th St to Esplanade Ave Collector, 2D Urban Arterial, 6D Arterial, 6D Ramona Exwy Esplanade Ave to Hemet St Collector, 2U Urban Arterial, 6D Arterial, 6D San Jacinto Ave Main St to 7th St Collector, 2D Major, 4D Arterial, 4D 7th St West of Sanderson Ave Collector, 2U Secondary, 4U Major, 4D 7th St Lyon Ave to State St Collector, 2D Secondary, 4U Major, 4D 7th St San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St Collector, 2D Secondary, 4U Major, 4D 7th St Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy Collector, 2U Secondary, 4U Major, 4D

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3430 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

44 Roadway Segment Limits Existing
Roadway1
2006 General
Plan Roadway
Classification2
2040 General
Plan Roadway
Classification3
State St College Entrance to Community Coll. Arterial, 4D Major, 4D Arterial, 4D State St Comm College to Ramona Exwy Arterial, 4D Major, 4D Arterial, 4D Warren Road Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave Collector, 2U Arterial, 4D Arterial, 4D Notes:
1) As observed in Google Earth Aerials. Accessed 10/15/2021. 2U = two lane undivided, 2D =two lane divided, 4D four lane divided, and 6D = six lane divided. 2) As shown in Figure C-2 Roadway System in the 2006 City of San Jacinto General Plan. 3) As shown in Figure M-2 provided to MD Acoustics October 2021 by Kittleson Associates. 4) LAH = Limited Access Highway.
5) LACH = Limited Access Conventional Highway.

The primary noise source in the Study Area will continue to be vehicle traffic. Future traffic noise level contours are presented in Exhibit I. Table 18 shows that future noise levels at a distance of 50 feet from the centerline of studied roadways will range between 70.7 and 84.2 dBA CNEL by the year 2040.

The distances to the 55, 60, 65, and 70 dBA CNEL noise contours are also provided in Table 18.

Table 18: Future Traffic Noise Levels (dBA, CNEL)
Roadway Segment Limits
CNEL,
dBA Distance to Noise Contour (feet)
@ 50ft 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA
Cottonwood Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 72.8 96 303 959 Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 72.8 96 303 959 Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave to State St 72.8 96 303 959
Esplanade Ave Warren Road to Cawston Ave 72.8 96 303 959 Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave to Sanderson Ave 72.7 92 292 923 Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 72.7 92 292 923 Esplanade Ave Lyon Ave to State St 72.7 92 292 923
Esplanade Ave State St to San Jacinto Ave 72.7 92 292 923 Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 72.7 92 292 923 Esplanade Ave Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 72.7 92 292 923
Main St Ramona Exwy to Soboba Road 72.7 92 292 923
Ramona Exwy West of Warren Road 73.7 117 369 1,168
Ramona Exwy Warren Road to Sanderson Ave 81.9 769 2,431 7,688 Ramona Exwy Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 81.9 769 2,431 7,688 Ramona Exwy Lyon Ave to State St 81.9 769 2,431 7,688
Ramona Exwy State St to San Jacinto Ave 81.9 769 2,431 7,688 Ramona Exwy San Jacinto Ave to Main St 83.2 1,041 3,291 10,407 Ramona Exwy Main St to 7th St 83.2 1,041 3,291 10,407
Ramona Exwy 7th St to Esplanade Ave 83.2 1,041 3,291 10,407

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3431 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

45 Roadway Segment Limits CNEL,
dBA Distance to Noise Contour (feet)
Ramona Exwy Esplanade Ave to Hemet St 83.2 1,041 3,291 10,407 San Jacinto Ave Main St to 7th St 76.9 243 768 2,429
San Jacinto Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 76.0 198 626 1,981 San Jacinto Ave South of Esplanade Ave 76.0 198 626 1,981 Sanderson Ave Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 76.0 198 626 1,981 Sanderson Ave Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 77.2 262 827 2,616 Sanderson Ave Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 77.2 262 827 2,616 Sanderson Ave 7th St to Esplanade Ave 77.2 262 827 2,616 7th St West of Sanderson Ave 77.2 262 827 2,616
7th St Sanderson Ave to Lyon Ave 68.1 33 103 326
7th St Lyon Ave to State St 68.1 33 103 326
7th St State St to San Jacinto Ave 68.1 33 103 326
7th St San Jacinto Ave to Hewitt St 68.1 33 103 326
7th St Hewitt St to Ramona Exwy 68.1 33 103 326
State St College Entrance to Community Coll. 68.1 33 103 326 State St Comm College to Ramona Exwy 76.1 206 651 2,059 State St Ramona Exwy to Ramona Blvd 76.1 206 651 2,059
State St Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood Ave 77.7 291 921 2,912 State St Cottonwood Ave to 7th St 77.7 291 921 2,912
State St 7th St to Esplanade Ave 77.7 291 921 2,912
State St South of Esplanade Ave 77.7 291 921 2,912
Warren Road Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave 76.0 200 632 1,997 Warren Road Ramona Exwy to Esplanade Ave 71.0 62 197 623 Notes:

1. Exterior noise levels calculated at 5-feet above ground.

2. Noise levels calculated from centerline of subject roadway.

As shown in Table 19 and Exhibit I, by the year 2040, existing land uses adjacent to the studied roadways will be exposed to noise levels that exceed the City’s exterior standards presented in Table 7.

Compared to existing traffic noise levels, future (2040) traffic volumes are expected to be up to 11.9 dBA CNEL louder than existing ambient noise levels at existing land uses and will result in substantial increases in ambient noise along most of the studied road segments (see Table 19). The exceptions are Ramona Expressway, west of Warren Avenue; Sanderson Avenue and Warren Road between Ramona Expressway and Esplanade Avenue; and 7th Street from its western terminus to Lyon Avenue, where no increases in ambient noise levels are expected due to anticipated re-routing of vehicle trips.

Implementation of the proposed 2040 General Plan Land Use Plan and Circulation Map will result in substantial permanent increases in existing noise levels at existing and future sensitive receptors.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3432 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

46 Table 19: Change in Noise Along Roadways Due to San Jacinto General Plan Update (dBA, CNEL) Roadway Segment
Most Affected
Existing
Sensitive Land
Uses1,5
CNEL at 50 Feet
dBA CNEL3

Change
in Noise
Level
Significance
Threshold2,4
Potential
Significant
Impact
Existing Future
2040
Cottonwood Ave Warren Rd to Cawston
Ave SFR 69.5 72.8 3.3 3 Yes
Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave to
Lyon Ave SCHOOL 69.5 72.8 3.3 5 No
Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave to State St SFR 69.5 72.8 3.3 3 Yes Esplanade Ave Warren Rd to Cawston
Ave SFR 63.9 72.8 8.9 3 Yes
Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave to
Sanderson Ave SFR 64.6 72.7 8.1 3 Yes
Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave to
Lyon Ave SFR 66.1 72.7 6.6 3 Yes
Esplanade Ave Lyon Ave to State St SFR 69.6 72.7 3.1 3 Yes Esplanade Ave State St to San Jacinto
Ave SFR 71 72.7 1.7 1.5 Yes
Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave to
Hewitt St SFR 70.1 72.7 2.6 1.5 Yes
Esplanade Ave Hewitt St to Ramona
Exwy SFR 68.1 72.7 4.6 3 Yes
Main St Ramona Exwy to
Soboba Rd SFR 67.1 72.7 5.6 3 Yes
Ramona Exwy West of Warren Rd SFR 75.5 73.7 0.0 1.5 No
Ramona Exwy Warren Rd to
Sanderson Ave SFR 78.4 81.9 3.5 1.5 Yes
Ramona Exwy Sanderson Ave to
Lyon Ave SFR 80.2 81.9 1.7 1.5 Yes
Ramona Exwy Lyon Ave to State St SFR 78 81.9 3.9 1.5 Yes Ramona Exwy State St to San Jacinto
Ave SFR 75.8 81.9 6.1 1.5 Yes
Ramona Exwy San Jacinto Ave to
Main St SFR 75.6 83.2 7.6 1.5 Yes
Ramona Exwy Main St to 7th St OFFICE 73.5 83.2 9.7 3 Yes Ramona Exwy 7th St to Esplanade
Ave SFR 73.5 83.2 9.7 1.5 Yes
Ramona Exwy Esplanade Ave to
Hemet St SFR 75.1 83.2 8.1 1.5 Yes
San Jacinto Ave Main St to 7th St SFR 67.4 76.9 9.5 3 Yes San Jacinto Ave 7th St to Esplanade
Ave CHURCH 69.7 76.0 6.3 3 Yes
San Jacinto Ave South of Esplanade
Ave NONE 70.3 76.0 5.7 n/a No
Sanderson Ave Ramona Exwy to
Ramona Blvd NONE 77.4 76.0 0.0 n/a No

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3433 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

47 Roadway Segment
Most Affected
Existing
Sensitive Land
Uses1,5
CNEL at 50 Feet
dBA CNEL3

Change
in Noise
Level
Significance
Threshold2,4
Potential
Significant
Impact
Sanderson Ave Ramona Blvd to
Cottonwood Ave SFR 77.4 77.2 0.0 1.5 No
Sanderson Ave Cottonwood Ave to
7th St SFR 78.2 77.2 0.0 1.5 No
Sanderson Ave 7th St to Esplanade
Ave SFR 71.9 77.2 5.3 1.5 Yes
7th St West of Sanderson
Ave SFR 68.2 68.1 0.0 3 No
7th St Sanderson Ave to
Lyon Ave SFR 68.2 68.1 0.0 3 No
7th St Lyon Ave to State St SFR 68.3 68.1 0.0 3 No
7th St State St to San Jacinto
Ave SFR 65.2 68.1 2.9 3 No
7th St San Jacinto Ave to
Hewitt St SFR 63.4 68.1 4.7 3 Yes
7th St Hewitt St to Ramona
Exwy SFR 62.1 68.1 6.0 3 Yes
State St College Entrance to
Community Coll. SCHOOL 69.4 76.1 6.7 3 Yes
State St Comm. College to
Ramona Exwy NONE 71.8 77.7 5.9 n/a No
State St Ramona Exwy to
Ramona Blvd NONE 71.8 77.7 5.9 n/a No
State St Ramona Blvd to
Cottonwood Ave CHURCH 71.3 77.7 6.4 1.5 Yes
State St Cottonwood Ave to
7th St SFR 65.8 77.7 11.9 3 Yes
State St 7th St to Esplanade
Ave SFR 66.6 77.7 11.1 3 Yes
State St South of Esplanade
Ave NONE 71.2 76.0 4.8 n/a No
Warren Rd Ramona Exwy to
Esplanade Ave SFR 73.7 71.0 0.0 1.5 No
Notes:

1. This table includes land uses for which the City has identified criteria (Table 7, Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure).

2. See Table 7, Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure.

3. Existing and Future traffic volumes compiled from the traffic study prepared for the project (Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2021).

4. Per Proposed General Plan Policy 6a, a substantial increase will occur if ambient noise levels have a substantial increase. Generally, a 3 dB increase in noise levels is barely perceptible, and a 5 dB increase in noise levels is clearly perceptible. Therefore, increases in noise levels shall be considered to be substantial when the following occurs:
• Existing noise levels are within or below the “normally acceptable” noise criteria at the affected land use (see Table 8) and the project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA CNEL or greater project-related noise level increase; or • Existing noise levels fall within the “conditionally acceptable” noise criteria and the project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA CNEL or greater project-related noise level increase; or
• Existing noise levels exceed the “conditionally acceptable” noise criteria, and the project creates a community noise level impact of greater than 1.5 dBA CNEL.

5. SFR = Single Family Residential, MFR = Multi-Family Residential, MHP = Mobile Home Park.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3434 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Exhibit I
48 2040 Noise Level Contours (CNEL)
Existing Noise Environment
San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3435 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

49 Implementation of the proposed 2040 General Plan Land Use Plan and Circulation Element will result in significant impacts related to exceedances of the land use compatibility criteria and substantial increases in ambient noise levels as presented in Table 19. Table 19 does not include sensitive uses that are further than 50 ft from the centerline and does not consider noise reduction factors such as property line walls. Where existing land uses will be impacted, the impact would be significant and unavoidable as setback distances of existing sensitive receptors are already established. Where existing land uses would be impacted, the impact would be significant and unmitigable. In order to reduce these impacts, the use of sound walls or quiet pavements could be employed. Construction of new sound walls could be a feasible mitigation measure. However, many impacted residential uses along the roadway segments listed above are accessed directly via driveways off the main roadway or may already have a sound wall. A new sound wall would require many driveway openings, resulting in partial noise barriers. These openings in the sound wall would substantially reduce the noise barrier performance.

Additionally, raising the heights of sound walls or constructing new noise barriers would result in encroachment on private property. Such encroachment would require private property owners to allow permission to enter their property. Raising sound wall heights would likely require enlarging footings, thereby requiring the demolition of existing sound walls. Therefore, the use of new sound walls or modifying sound walls is not considered to be practical.

Quiet pavements have been used to mitigate traffic noise and are typically assumed to provide a 3 to 5 dBA reduction. Quiet pavement placed along sensitive receptor areas on the impacted roadway segments could reduce traffic noise levels. Many of the noise impacts outlined in the previous tables could potentially be mitigated through the use of quiet pavement. However, not all impacted roadway segments could be mitigated by quiet pavements due to the magnitude of the traffic noise increases.

Additionally, widespread repaving of city streets with quiet pavements would be expensive and impractical. There are no feasible noise reduction measures beyond those identified within the policies and actions listed above and those listed below that would reduce impacts.

General Plan Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.10 and Actions PS-6a through PS-6i, identified below, are intended to minimize exposure to excessive noise, including traffic-related noise. Specifically, Policies PS-6.1 and PS-6.2 support noise-compatible land uses in the vicinity of traffic noise sources and require that new development and infrastructure projects be reviewed for consistency with the noise standards established in Tables PS-1 and PS-2. The proposed General Plan standards required under Policy PS-6.1 for exposure to traffic noise meet or exceed the noise level standards shown in General Plan Tables PS-1 and PS-2. Policy PS-6.2 and Actions PS-6b would ensure that new development mitigates potential noise impacts by incorporating the noise control treatments necessary to achieve acceptable noise levels. Policy PS-6.3 sets criteria for evaluating future increases in traffic noise levels.

Action PS-6a would ensure that the San Jacinto Municipal Code, including the updated noise ordinance, is consistent with the noise standards established in the General Plan. Implementing the proposed policies and actions of the General Plan would reduce noise and land use compatibility impacts from vehicular traffic noise sources and ensure that new development is designed to include noise-attenuating features. However, as shown in Table 19, the traffic noise increases associated with

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3436 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

50 the proposed General Plan exceed the applicable noise exposure criteria. Therefore, the proposed General Plan would have a significant and unavoidable impact relative to traffic noise on existing noisesensitive uses in the City.

Where proposed land uses are expected to be exposed to noise levels that exceed the “normally acceptable” land use compatibility criteria presented in Table 7, impacts can be mitigated to “less than significant” with the implementation the of proposed General Plan Noise Element Goal PS-6.1, Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.5 and Actions PS-6a through 6c as listed in Section 4.3.1.

7.2 Stationary Noise
Implementation of the General Plan could result in the future development of land uses that generate noise levels in excess of applicable City noise standards for non-transportation noise sources. Such land uses may include commercial area loading docks, industrial uses, HVAC equipment, car washes, daycare facilities, auto repair, and recreational uses. While the General Plan does not explicitly propose any new noise-generating uses, the Land Use Map includes industrial land use designations, which may result in new noise sources. Specific development projects and the details of future noise-generating land uses that may be located in the City in the future are not known at this time. Additionally, noise from existing stationary sources, as identified in the Existing Settings Section, would continue to impact noise-sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the noise sources. New projects which may include stationary noise sources such as automotive and truck repair facilities, tire installation centers, car washes, loading docks, corporation yards, parks, and play fields may create noise levels in excess of the City’s standards.

While no specific projects are proposed under the General Plan Update, changes in land use may allow for more intensive noise-generating uses in closer proximity to noise-sensitive uses. Where this occurs, detailed noise studies would be required to ensure that noise control measures are implemented into the project design. Such measures could include the redesign of industrial noise sources away from sensitive uses, construction of sound walls or berms between noise generating uses and sensitive uses, using buildings to create additional buffer distance and screening, or other site design measures to ensure that non-transportation (stationary) noise sources do not cause exterior noise levels to exceed allowable standards at sensitive receptors.

The General Plan includes policies and actions that are intended to reduce noise associated with stationary sources. Specifically, Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.3 and PS-6.6 through PS-6.10 and Actions PS-6b, PS-6c and PS-6d would reduce noise associated with stationary sources. Policy PS-6.2 and Action PS-6b require new development to mitigate excessive noise to the standards indicated in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 through best practices, including building location and orientation, building design features, placement of noise-generating equipment away from sensitive receptors, shielding of noisegenerating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant features between noise sources and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-minimizing materials. Implementation of the proposed policies and actions of the General Plan Update would reduce noise impacts from stationary noise sources to a less than significant level.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3437 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

51 7.3 Construction Noise
The degree of construction noise may vary for different projects within the scope of the General Plan and also vary depending on the construction activities. Noise levels associated with the construction will vary with the different phases of construction.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has compiled data regarding the noise-generated characteristics of typical construction activities. The data is presented in Table 20. These noise levels would diminish rapidly with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 86 dBA measured 50 feet from the noise source would reduce to 80 dBA at 100 feet. At 200 feet from the noise source, the noise level would reduce to 74 dBA. At 400 feet, the noise source would reduce by another 6 dBA to 68 dBA. Contractors are required to comply with the City of San Jacinto’s Noise Ordinance during construction described in Section 8.40.090.

Table 20: Typical Construction Noise Levels

Equipment Powered by Internal Combustion Engines
Type Noise Levels (dBA) at 50 Feet
Earth Moving
Compactors (Rollers) 73 - 76
Front Loaders 73 - 84
Backhoes 73 - 92
Tractors 75 - 95
Scrapers, Graders 78 - 92
Pavers 85 - 87
Trucks 81 - 94
Materials Handling
Concrete Mixers 72 - 87
Concrete Pumps 81 - 83
Cranes (Movable) 72 - 86
Cranes (Derrick) 85 - 87
Stationary
Pumps 68 - 71
Generators 71 - 83
Compressors 75 - 86
Impact Equipment
Saws 71 - 82
Vibrators 68 - 82
Notes:

Source: Reference Noise Levels from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

7.3.1 Construction Related Traffic
The projects within the scope of the General Plan would result in short-term noise impacts associated with construction activities. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction activities. First, construction crew commute and the transport of construction equipment and

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3438 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

52 materials to the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site. Truck traffic associated with project construction should be limited to within the permitted construction hours, as listed in the City’s Municipal Code. Although there would be a relatively high single-event noise exposure potential at a maximum of 87 dBA Lmax at 50 ft from passing trucks, causing possible short-term intermittent annoyances, the effect on ambient noise levels would be less than 1 dBA when averaged over one hour or 24 hours. In other words, the changes in noise levels over 1 hour or 24 hours attributable to passing trucks would not be perceptible to the normal human ear. Therefore, short-term construction-related impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport on local streets leading to the project site would result in a less than significant impact on noise-sensitive receptors along the access routes. No mitigation is required.

7.3.2 On-Site Construction Activities
Site preparation phase, which includes grading and paving, tends to generate the highest noise levels since the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backhoes, bulldozers, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers, and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower power settings. Site-specific construction activities associated with future development is expected to require the use of scrapers, bulldozers, motor graders, and water and pickup trucks. The maximum noise level generated by each scraper is assumed to be approximately 87 dBA Lmax at 50 ft from the scraper in operation. Each bulldozer would also generate approximately 85 dBA Lmax at 50 ft.

The maximum noise level generated by the sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Noise reduction potential will be project and site-specific. Implementation of Noise Element Action PS-6e can result in less than significant construction noise impacts.

7.4 Groundborne Vibration
The main sources of vibration in the project area are related to vehicles and construction. Typical roadway traffic, including heavy trucks, rarely generates vibration amplitudes high enough to cause structural or cosmetic damage. However, there have been cases in which heavy trucks traveling over potholes or other discontinuities in the pavement have caused vibration high enough to result in complaints from nearby residents. These types of issues typically can be resolved by smoothing the roadway surface (Caltrans 2020).

Construction activities that produce vibration that can be felt by adjacent land uses include the use of vibratory equipment, large bulldozers, and pile drivers. The primary sources of vibration during construction are usually vibratory rollers and large bulldozers. As shown in Table 21, a vibratory roller has a peak particle velocity (inches/second) of 0.21 and a large bulldozer has a peak particle velocity of

0.089 (inches per second) at 25 feet. The use of pile driving equipment can generate a peak particle velocity of 1.5 (inches per second) depending on the size and model.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3439 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

53 Table 21: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment

Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity Approximate Vibration Level
(inches/second) at 25 feet LV (VdB) at 25 feet
Pile driver (impact)

1.518 (upper range) 112

0.644 (typical) 104
Pile driver (sonic)

0.734 upper range 105

0.170 typical 93
Clam shovel drop (slurry wall) 0.202 94
Hydromill 0.008 in soil 66
(slurry wall) 0.017 in rock 75
Vibratory Roller 0.21 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large bulldozer 0.089 87
Caisson drill 0.089 87
Loaded trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Federal Transit Administration, May 2006.

The California Department of Transportation has published one of the seminal works for the analysis of ground-borne noise and vibration relating to transportation- and construction-induced vibrations and, although the project is not subject to these regulations, it serves as a useful tool to evaluate vibration impacts (California Department of Transportation, 2013). Table 22 provides maximum PPV levels (inches/second) to be used to determine if groundborne vibration may result in damage, depending on the type of structure. When evaluated in light of the estimated groundborne vibration levels presented in Table 19, it can be determined that construction activities in the project area have the potential to result in significant impacts related to groundborne vibration associated with construction activities.

These impacts can be avoided with implementation of General Plan Policy PS-6h. <Table 22, next page>

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3440 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA Future Noise Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation

54 Table 22: Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria Maximum PPV (inches/second)
Structure and Condition Transient Sources Continuous/Frequent Intermittent Source
Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, ancient monuments 0.1 0.1 Fragile buildings 0.2 0.1
Historic and some old buildings 0.5 0.3
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5
Source: California Department of Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. April 2020.

Note: transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3441 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA CEQA Analysis

55 8.0 CEQA Analysis
The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Appendix G) establishes thresholds for noise impact analysis as presented below:
(a) Would the project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise Code, or applicable standards of other agencies? Transportation Noise Impacts
The significance criteria for Transportation Noise Standards are based on published guidance from FICON, which have been incorporated into the proposed General Plan under Policy PS-6.3.

Transportation noise may result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels if:
• Existing noise levels are within or below the “normally acceptable” noise criteria at the affected land use (see Table 7) and the project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA CNEL or greater project-related noise level increase; or
• Existing noise levels fall within the “conditionally acceptable” noise criteria and the project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA CNEL or greater project-related noise level increase; or • Existing noise levels exceed the “conditionally acceptable” noise criteria, and the project creates a community noise level impact of greater than 1.5 dBA CNEL.

Implementation of the proposed 2040 General Plan Land Use Plan and Circulation Map will result in substantial permanent increases in existing noise levels at sensitive receptors.

Implementation of the proposed 2040 General Plan Land Use Plan and Circulation Element will result in significant impacts related to exceedances of the land use compatibility criteria and substantial increases in ambient noise levels as presented in Table 19. Where existing land uses will be impacted, the impact would be significant and unmitigable. Where proposed land uses are expected to be exposed to noise levels that exceed the “normally acceptable” land use compatibility criteria presented in Table 7, impacts can be mitigated to “less than significant” with implementation of proposed General Plan Noise Element Goal PS-6.1, Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.6 and Actions PS-6a through 6c as listed in Section 4.3.1.

Stationary Noise Sources

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3442 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA CEQA Analysis

56 • Stationary noise impacts would be considered significant if they result in exceedances of the criteria presented in Tables 10 and 11 or the project will result in an increase in ambient noise levels by more than 3 dB, whichever is greater..

Implementation of the proposed General Plan Land Use Plan may result in stationary noise impacts related to HVAC Systems, Cooling Towers/Evaporative Condensers, Pump Stations, Lift Stations, Emergency Generators, Boilers, Steam Valves, Steam Turbines, Generator, Fans, Air Compressors, Heavy Equipment, Conveyor Systems, Transformers, Pile Drivers, Grinders, Drill Rigs, Gas or Diesel Motors, Welders, Cutting Equipment, Outdoor Speakers, Blowers and Pneumatic Equipment. This list is not intended to be exclusive. Implementation of good land use planning and policies and actions can minimize noise impacts related to these sources by avoiding the placement of noise generating equipment near noise-sensitive land uses and where unavoidable, include design measures to the degree practicable to avoid violating the noise criteria presented in Tables 10 and 11. Stationary noise impacts can be mitigated to “less than significant” with implementation of proposed General Plan Noise Element Goal PS-6.1, Policies PS-6.6 through PS-6.8 and Actions PS-6a through 6d as listed in Section 4.3.1.

Construction Noise and Vibration
Construction noise will be significant if:
• Construction activities occur outside of the permitted construction hours specified in Chapter

8.40 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code and also exceed the exterior or interior stationary noise criteria presented in Tables 10 and 11.
• Construction activities are not consistent with the proposed 2040 General Plan Noise Goals, Policies and Actions.

Implementation of the proposed General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements would result in shortterm noise impacts associated with construction activities. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction activities, on-site and off-site.

Construction crew commute and the transport of construction equipment and materials to the site for the proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site.

Truck traffic associated with project construction should be limited to within the permitted construction hours, as listed in the City’s Municipal Code. Although there would be a relatively high single-event noise exposure potential at a maximum of 87 dBA Lmax at 50 ft from passing trucks, causing possible short-term intermittent annoyances, the effect on ambient noise levels would be less than 1 dBA when averaged over one hour or 24 hours. In other words, the changes in noise levels over 1 hour or 24 hours attributable to passing trucks would not be perceptible to the normal human ear.

Therefore, short-term construction-related impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport on local streets leading to the project site would result in a less than significant impact on noise-sensitive receptors along the access routes. No mitigation is required.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3443 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA CEQA Analysis

57 The site preparation phase of on-site construction activities, which includes grading and paving, tends to generate the highest noise levels since the noisiest construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backhoes, bulldozers, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers, and graders.

Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower power settings. Site-specific construction activities associated with future development is expected to require the use of scrapers, bulldozers, motor graders, and water and pickup trucks. The maximum noise level generated by each scraper is assumed to be approximately 87 dBA Lmax at 50 ft from the scraper in operation. Each bulldozer would also generate approximately 85 dBA Lmax at 50 ft. The maximum noise level generated by the sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Noise reduction potential will be project and site-specific. Implementation of Noise Element Action PS-6e can result in less than significant construction noise impacts.
b) Generate excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? Construction vibration will be significant if vibration exceeds levels that would result in structural damage to existing buildings. Implementation of the proposed General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements would result in short-term vibration impacts associated with construction activities. The Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans 2020) has recommended vibration thresholds for various types of receivers (see Table 22). This impact would be less than significant with the implementation of PS-6h which limits vibration levels to 0.08 in/sec PPV for historical buildings and 0.3 in/sec PPV for other buildings.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3444 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) City of San Jacinto General Plan
Noise Impact Study
City of San Jacinto, CA References

58 9.0 References
American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
Specifications for sound level meters (S1.4-1983 identified in Chapter 19.68.020.AA).

California, State of, Building Standards Commission
2019 California Uniform Building Code (UBC), Title 24.
2019 Green Code Section 5.507.4.3 (2019)
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
2013 Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. 2020 Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. April. 2021 Caltrans Traffic Counts https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/census California Office of Noise Control
2017 Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of Noise Elements of the General Plan. February.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
1974 Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. Prepared by the EPA, Office of Noise Abatement and Control.

Federal Interagency Committee on Noise
1992 Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. August.

Federal Transit Administration
2006 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Emissions. FTAVA-90-1003-06.

Office of Planning and Research, State of California
2017 Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines.

San Jacinto, City of
2006 City of San Jacinto General Plan.

City of San Jacinto Code of Ordinance

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3445 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix A:

SoundPLAN Data

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3446 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3447 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GP Noise
Emission calculation road - 001 - Existing: Outdoor GNM 16 Road ADT
Veh/24h
MSVges
Day
Veh/h
MSVges
Evening
Veh/h
MSVges
Night
Veh/h
Pavement type
7th St_Hewitt to Ramona Expwy 9550 614.49 354.90 123.49 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_Lyon to State 9650 620.92 358.62 124.78 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th ST_San Jacinto to Hewitt 8500 546.93 315.88 109.91 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_Sanderson to Lyon 6300 405.37 234.12 81.46 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_State to San Jacinto 11200 720.66 416.22 144.83 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_West to Sanderson 9650 620.92 358.62 124.78 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Cottonwood Ave_Cawston to State 6750 412.91 179.15 139.73 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Cottonwood Ave_Warren to Cawston 5300 324.21 140.67 109.71 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Cawston to Sanderson 6800 440.16 269.00 79.01 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Hewitt to Ramona Expwy 9550 618.16 377.79 110.97 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Lyon to State 13350 864.13 528.12 155.12 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_San Jacinto to Hewitt 15150 980.64 599.32 176.04 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Sanderson to Lyon 9550 618.16 377.79 110.97 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_State to San Jacinto 18400 1191.01 727.89 213.80 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Warren to Cawston 5800 375.43 229.44 67.39 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Main - Ram E to Soboba 8650 556.58 321.46 111.85 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Esplanade to Wash 16250 994.05 431.29 336.39 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Lyon to State 25050 1417.89 856.74 607.24 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Main/Lake Park to Esp 11000 672.90 291.95 227.71 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_San Jacinto to Main 10850 663.72 287.97 224.60 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Sanderson to Lyon 27050 1531.09 925.15 655.72 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_State to San Jacinto 20150 1140.54 689.16 488.46 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Warren to Sanderson 23750 1344.30 812.28 575.72 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_West of Warren 22200 1256.57 759.27 538.15 Average (of DGAC and PCC) San Jacinto Ave_7th to Esplanade 18600 1203.95 735.80 216.13 Average (of DGAC and PCC) San Jacinto Ave_Main/Ramona Blvd to 7th 12650 818.82 500.42 146.99 Average (of DGAC and PCC) San Jacinto Ave_South of Esplanade 21546 1394.64 852.34 250.36 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Sanderson Ave_7th to Esplanade 6700 409.86 177.83 138.70 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Sanderson Ave_Cottonwood to 7th 28500 1743.41 756.42 589.97 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Sanderson Ave_Ramona Expwy to Cott 23515 1438.47 624.11 486.78 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State Espl to Crow 19520 1263.50 772.20 226.82 Average (of DGAC and PCC) SoundPLAN 8.2
MD Acoustics LLC 4960 S. Gilbert Rd Chandler, AZ 85249 Phone: 602 774 1950 1

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3448 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GP Noise
Emission calculation road - 001 - Existing: Outdoor GNM 16 Road ADT
Veh/24h
MSVges
Day
Veh/h
MSVges
Evening
Veh/h
MSVges
Night
Veh/h
Pavement type
State St_7th to Esplanade 6700 433.68 265.05 77.85 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Coll Dr to Ram Ex 16650 1077.73 658.66 193.47 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Coll En to Call Dr 14950 967.69 591.41 173.72 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Cottonwood to 7th 5550 359.24 219.55 64.49 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood 19650 1271.92 777.34 228.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Ramona Expwy to Ramona Blvd 22050 1427.27 872.28 256.22 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Warren Road_Ramona Ex to Espl 11778 720.49 312.60 243.81 Average (of DGAC and PCC) SoundPLAN 8.2
MD Acoustics LLC 4960 S. Gilbert Rd Chandler, AZ 85249 Phone: 602 774 1950 2

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3449 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GP Noise
Emission calculation road - 003 - Future Kittleson: Outdoor GNM 16 Road ADT
Veh/24h
MSVges
Day
Veh/h
MSVges
Evening
Veh/h
MSVges
Night
Veh/h
Constrained speed
km/h
Pavement type
7th St_Hewitt to Ramona Expwy 9667 625.73 382.42 112.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_Lyon to State 9667 625.73 382.42 112.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th ST_San Jacinto to Hewitt 9667 625.73 382.42 112.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_Sanderson to Lyon 9667 625.73 382.42 112.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_State to San Jacinto 9667 625.73 382.42 112.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) 7th St_West to Sanderson 9667 625.73 382.42 112.33 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Cottonwood Ave_Warren to State 12438 760.86 330.12 257.48 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Warren to Old Mtn 14997 917.40 398.04 310.45 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Esplanade Ave_Warren to Old Mtn 14997 916.57 652.87 226.62 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Main - Ram E to Soboba 18986 1161.42 503.91 393.03 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Esplande to Hemet St 10787 659.87 286.30 223.30 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_Sanderson to State 34141 2088.49 906.14 706.75 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_State to Esplande 46217 2827.21 1226.65 956.73 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Ramona Expwy_West of Sanderson 34141 1932.46 1167.67 827.61 Average (of DGAC and PCC) San Jacinto Ave_Main to Menlo 25700 1572.13 682.11 532.01 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Sanderson Ave_Ramona Expwy to Esplande 22568 1380.54 598.98 467.18 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Coll Ent to Ram Expy 26714 1634.16 709.02 553.00 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Esplande to Crow 25912 1585.10 687.73 536.40 Average (of DGAC and PCC) State St_Ram expy to Esplande 37777 2310.91 1002.64 782.02 Average (of DGAC and PCC) Warren Road_Ramona Ex to Espl 5372 328.62 142.58 111.20 Average (of DGAC and PCC) SoundPLAN 8.2
MD Acoustics LLC 4960 S. Gilbert Rd Chandler, AZ 85249 Phone: 602 774 1950 1

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3450 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3451 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix B:

Noise Measurement Data and Field Sheets

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3452 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3453 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: San Jacinto, CA
Date:

Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: XL2 SN: 08562-E0
Settings: A-weighted, fast, 1-sec, 10-minute duration
Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: ST-1 thru ST-7
Location Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
1 1:01 PM 1:11 PM 75.7 101.6 39.9 81.1 77.9 72.4 64.1 47.1 2 1:27 PM 1:37 PM 69.2 88.0 44.6 77.1 74.2 69.6 64.0 52.9 3 1:49 PM 1:59 PM 69.5 87.0 57.2 77.1 71.9 68.8 65.9 62.2 4 2:10 PM 2:20 PM 67.3 82.6 54.5 75.2 70.5 66.9 64.7 60.8 5 2:10 PM 2:20 PM 71.6 86.5 54.0 79.4 75.4 72.0 68.2 61.3 6 2:52 PM 3:02 PM 69.0 92.2 48.6 77.5 69.5 64.6 61.9 55.3 7 3:43 PM 3:53 PM 68.9 81.4 52.2 76.2 72.8 70.3 65.8 57.4 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
5/7/2019
Table 1: Morning - Baseline Noise Measurement Summary
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along roads as lited for each measurement.
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3454 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS
Site Address/Location: San Jacinto, CA
Site ID: ST-1 thru ST-7
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

Figure 1: Monitoring Locations 1-7
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3455 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: Warren Road & Byrd St C/L of Warren Road is 25ft from meter Site ID: ST-1 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Byrd St is 240ft from meter 64 Degrees
Cloudy, no wind
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-1

0.0 20.0

40.0 60.0

80.0 100.0
120.0
1:01:21 PM1:01:36 PM1:01:51 PM1:02:06 PM1:02:21 PM1:02:36 PM1:02:51 PM1:03:06 PM1:03:21 PM1:03:36 PM1:03:51 PM1:04:06 PM1:04:21 PM1:04:36 PM1:04:51 PM1:05:06 PM1:05:21 PM1:05:36 PM1:05:51 PM1:06:06 PM1:06:21 PM1:06:36 PM1:06:51 PM1:07:06 PM1:07:21 PM1:07:36 PM1:07:51 PM1:08:06 PM1:08:21 PM1:08:36 PM1:08:51 PM1:09:06 PM1:09:21 PM1:09:36 PM1:09:51 PM1:10:06 PM1:10:21 PM1:10:36 PM1:10:51 PM1:11:06 PM dBA
Time
ST-1: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-1
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3456 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 2-1: ST-1 Site
Figure 2-2: ST-1 Photo
Figure 2-3: ST-1 Photo
1 10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3457 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: Palm Ave & 7th St C/L of Palm Ave is 30ft from meter Site ID: ST-2 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of 7th St is 50ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-2 63 Degrees
Cloudy, slight wind

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
1:27:09 PM1:27:24 PM1:27:39 PM1:27:54 PM1:28:09 PM1:28:24 PM1:28:39 PM1:28:54 PM1:29:09 PM1:29:24 PM1:29:39 PM1:29:54 PM1:30:09 PM1:30:24 PM1:30:39 PM1:30:54 PM1:31:09 PM1:31:24 PM1:31:39 PM1:31:54 PM1:32:09 PM1:32:24 PM1:32:39 PM1:32:54 PM1:33:09 PM1:33:24 PM1:33:39 PM1:33:54 PM1:34:09 PM1:34:24 PM1:34:39 PM1:34:54 PM1:35:09 PM1:35:24 PM1:35:39 PM1:35:54 PM1:36:09 PM1:36:24 PM1:36:39 PM1:36:54 PM dBA
Time
ST-2: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-2
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3458 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 3-1: ST-2 Site
Figure 3-2: ST-2 Photo
2 10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3459 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: San Jacinto Ave & Esplanade Ave C/L of San Jacinto Ave is 52ft from meter Site ID: ST-3 Ground Type: Hard site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Esplanade Ave is 62ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-3 62 Degrees
Cloudy, slight wind

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
1:48:57 PM1:49:12 PM1:49:27 PM1:49:42 PM1:49:57 PM1:50:12 PM1:50:27 PM1:50:42 PM1:50:57 PM1:51:12 PM1:51:27 PM1:51:42 PM1:51:57 PM1:52:12 PM1:52:27 PM1:52:42 PM1:52:57 PM1:53:12 PM1:53:27 PM1:53:42 PM1:53:57 PM1:54:12 PM1:54:27 PM1:54:42 PM1:54:57 PM1:55:12 PM1:55:27 PM1:55:42 PM1:55:57 PM1:56:12 PM1:56:27 PM1:56:42 PM1:56:57 PM1:57:12 PM1:57:27 PM1:57:42 PM1:57:57 PM1:58:12 PM1:58:27 PM1:58:42 PM dBA
Time
ST-3: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-3
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3460 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 1: ST-3 Site
3 10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3461 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: Hewitt St & 7th St C/L of Hewitt St is 35ft from meter Site ID: ST-4 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of 7th is 35ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-4 62 Degrees
Cloudy, slight wind

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
2:10:19 PM2:10:34 PM2:10:49 PM2:11:04 PM2:11:19 PM2:11:34 PM2:11:49 PM2:12:04 PM2:12:19 PM2:12:34 PM2:12:49 PM2:13:04 PM2:13:19 PM2:13:34 PM2:13:49 PM2:14:04 PM2:14:19 PM2:14:34 PM2:14:49 PM2:15:04 PM2:15:19 PM2:15:34 PM2:15:49 PM2:16:04 PM2:16:19 PM2:16:34 PM2:16:49 PM2:17:04 PM2:17:19 PM2:17:34 PM2:17:49 PM2:18:04 PM2:18:19 PM2:18:34 PM2:18:49 PM2:19:04 PM2:19:19 PM2:19:34 PM2:19:49 PM2:20:04 PM dBA
Time
ST-4: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-4
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3462 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 5: ST-4 Site 4
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3463 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: Ramona Exp & Esplanade Ave C/L of Ramona Exp is 45ft from meter Site ID: ST-5 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Esplanade Ave is 95ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-5 63 Degrees
Cloudy, slight wind

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
2:29:13 PM2:29:28 PM2:29:43 PM2:29:58 PM2:30:13 PM2:30:28 PM2:30:43 PM2:30:58 PM2:31:13 PM2:31:28 PM2:31:43 PM2:31:58 PM2:32:13 PM2:32:28 PM2:32:43 PM2:32:58 PM2:33:13 PM2:33:28 PM2:33:43 PM2:33:58 PM2:34:13 PM2:34:28 PM2:34:43 PM2:34:58 PM2:35:13 PM2:35:28 PM2:35:43 PM2:35:58 PM2:36:13 PM2:36:28 PM2:36:43 PM2:36:58 PM2:37:13 PM2:37:28 PM2:37:43 PM2:37:58 PM2:38:13 PM2:38:28 PM2:38:43 PM2:38:58 PM dBA
Time
ST-5: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-5
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3464 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 6: ST-5 Site 5
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3465 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: Lyon Ave & De Anza Dr C/L of Lyon Ave is 35ft from meter Site ID: ST-6 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of De Anzo Dr is 75ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-6 62 Degrees
Cloudy, no wind

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
2:52:01 PM2:52:16 PM2:52:31 PM2:52:46 PM2:53:01 PM2:53:16 PM2:53:31 PM2:53:46 PM2:54:01 PM2:54:16 PM2:54:31 PM2:54:46 PM2:55:01 PM2:55:16 PM2:55:31 PM2:55:46 PM2:56:01 PM2:56:16 PM2:56:31 PM2:56:46 PM2:57:01 PM2:57:16 PM2:57:31 PM2:57:46 PM2:58:01 PM2:58:16 PM2:58:31 PM2:58:46 PM2:59:01 PM2:59:16 PM2:59:31 PM2:59:46 PM3:00:01 PM3:00:16 PM3:00:31 PM3:00:46 PM3:01:01 PM3:01:16 PM3:01:31 PM3:01:46 PM dBA
Time
ST-6: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-6
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3466 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 7: ST-6 Site 6
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3467 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise STMS Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Site Address/Location: Oakwood St & Santa Fe St C/L of Santa Fe St is 32ft from meter Site ID: ST-7 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Oakwood St. is 43ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-7 62 Degrees
Cloudy, no wind

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
3:43:25 PM3:43:40 PM3:43:55 PM3:44:10 PM3:44:25 PM3:44:40 PM3:44:55 PM3:45:10 PM3:45:25 PM3:45:40 PM3:45:55 PM3:46:10 PM3:46:25 PM3:46:40 PM3:46:55 PM3:47:10 PM3:47:25 PM3:47:40 PM3:47:55 PM3:48:10 PM3:48:25 PM3:48:40 PM3:48:55 PM3:49:10 PM3:49:25 PM3:49:40 PM3:49:55 PM3:50:10 PM3:50:25 PM3:50:40 PM3:50:55 PM3:51:10 PM3:51:25 PM3:51:40 PM3:51:55 PM3:52:10 PM3:52:25 PM3:52:40 PM3:52:55 PM3:53:10 PM dBA
Time
ST-4: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-7
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3468 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 8: ST-7 Site 7
10Min_Field Sheet Compare

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3469 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: Warren Rd & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Date: 5/7/2019 to 5/8/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3714 Site Topo:

Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:

Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: LT-1
Figure 2: LT-1 Photo
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Warren Rd is 50ft from meter
C/L of Ramona Exp. is 70ft from meter
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Warren Rd and Ramona Exp.

Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-1 Monitoring Location
1 24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 1

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3470 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Warren Rd & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-1
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
5/7/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 67.8 86.0 48.7 72.0 71.6 68.9 66.7 62.2 5/7/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 67.9 84.1 50.6 72.7 70.0 68.3 67.4 64.1 5/7/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 69.9 93.3 49.7 76.0 71.4 69.2 67.4 64.3 5/7/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 70.1 92.6 52.5 76.1 73.2 69.6 67.5 64.9 5/7/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 67.3 86.7 53.1 71.4 69.7 68.2 66.8 63.7 5/7/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 65.2 81.9 53.6 68.4 66.6 65.4 64.8 63.0 5/7/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 65.9 83.0 52.5 71.4 67.9 65.8 64.9 63.1 5/7/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 66.5 79.6 53.7 69.3 68.3 67.0 66.1 65.0 5/7/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 66.5 78.8 55.1 68.5 68.0 67.1 66.2 65.1 5/7/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 66.7 80.3 54.9 69.2 68.3 67.2 66.4 65.1 5/7/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 66.2 78.2 55.7 68.4 67.4 66.6 66.0 65.1 5/7/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 65.6 78.3 55.1 67.6 67.2 66.3 65.4 63.9 5/7/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 65.0 79.3 50.1 67.9 66.9 65.6 64.5 63.1 5/8/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 63.6 79.4 48.3 68.8 66.3 64.5 63.1 59.8 5/8/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 62.0 78.4 46.7 66.8 64.6 62.8 61.1 58.3 5/8/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 60.7 77.0 44.0 64.0 63.0 62.3 60.3 54.9 5/8/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 61.7 76.6 44.6 64.3 64.0 62.9 62.0 56.5 5/8/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 61.0 81.8 45.4 64.7 63.5 62.7 61.3 54.4 5/8/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 62.0 79.9 47.0 66.8 65.7 63.6 61.3 55.0 5/8/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 63.1 79.1 46.9 66.4 65.9 64.8 63.2 57.3 5/8/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 65.1 79.1 49.1 68.7 67.0 66.1 64.9 60.3 5/8/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 66.0 78.1 49.8 68.4 67.4 66.7 66.1 63.7 5/8/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 66.7 76.6 50.5 70.0 68.5 67.3 66.3 64.8 5/8/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 67.4 81.2 50.7 70.9 68.5 67.7 67.1 65.8 CNEL: 70.4
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 1

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3471 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Warren Rd & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-1
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

67.8 67.9

69.9 70.1

67.3 65.2 65.9 66.5 66.5 66.7 66.2 65.6 65.0 63.6

62.0 60.7 61.7 61.0 62.0 63.1

65.1 66.0 66.7 67.4

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM 10:00 PM11:00 PM
12:00 AM
1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM 10:00 AM
Leq(h), dBA
Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 1

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3472 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Warren Rd & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-1
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 1

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3473 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Date: 5/7/2019 to 5/8/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3713 Site Topo:

Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:

Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: LT-2
Figure 2: LT-2 Photo
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Ramona Exp. is 50ft from meter
C/L of Sanderson Ave. is 215ft from meter
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Sanderson Ave and Ramona Exp.

Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-2 Monitoring Location
2 24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 4

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3474 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-2
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
5/7/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 63.7 75.7 47.7 67.3 66.2 65.1 62.7 60.0 5/7/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 64.9 83.3 49.0 69.2 68.1 65.4 63.8 61.4 5/7/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 66.2 90.5 51.8 69.8 67.4 65.9 64.8 62.4 5/7/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 67.3 91.6 51.2 70.7 69.0 66.7 65.2 62.7 5/7/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 66.6 81.1 57.1 69.7 68.9 67.4 66.2 64.2 5/7/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 68.4 90.5 58.0 75.6 69.2 68.2 66.6 64.7 5/7/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 66.6 76.7 57.4 69.5 69.1 67.3 66.0 64.3 5/7/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 66.5 85.0 53.8 70.3 68.9 67.4 65.7 63.7 5/7/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 64.9 80.7 52.0 69.2 68.2 65.8 63.6 61.9 5/7/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 62.2 73.8 50.5 64.9 64.3 63.4 62.0 59.4 5/7/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 61.7 81.8 48.1 67.6 64.3 62.1 60.5 57.5 5/7/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 63.3 87.9 47.7 73.1 64.5 62.0 60.0 57.1 5/7/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 62.3 84.6 44.2 68.2 65.2 62.0 60.0 56.8 5/8/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 62.2 88.2 40.6 70.8 63.8 60.1 57.6 53.7 5/8/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 57.1 70.6 36.7 61.5 60.1 58.0 56.3 52.7 5/8/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 57.4 72.6 37.3 61.0 59.9 58.9 57.2 53.0 5/8/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 57.2 72.1 37.9 60.3 59.7 58.5 56.4 53.7 5/8/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 57.3 72.5 43.1 61.0 60.4 58.3 56.5 54.1 5/8/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 59.4 77.6 45.0 63.5 62.9 60.5 58.2 55.4 5/8/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 60.6 76.8 46.9 65.0 64.3 61.5 59.5 57.4 5/8/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 62.3 77.1 49.1 65.3 64.8 63.2 61.7 59.3 5/8/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 63.4 76.6 49.8 66.8 65.8 64.4 63.4 59.9 5/8/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 64.0 77.4 50.5 66.8 65.8 65.0 63.8 61.6 5/8/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 63.6 77.0 50.7 66.7 65.1 64.3 63.5 61.3 CNEL: 67.9
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 4

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3475 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

63.7 64.9 66.2 67.3 66.6

68.4 66.6 66.5 64.9

62.2 61.7

63.3 62.3 62.2

57.1 57.4 57.2 57.3

59.4 60.6

62.3 63.4 64.0 63.6

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 4

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3476 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 4

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3477 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave, San Jacinto, CA Date: 5/8/2019 to 5/9/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: XL2 SN: 08562-E0 Site Topo:

Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:

Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: LT-3
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Sanderson Ave. is 50ft from meter
C/L of Cottonwood Ave. is 100ft from meter
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Sanderson Ave and Cottonwood Ave.

Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-3 Monitoring Location
Figure 2: LT-3 Photo
3 24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 5

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3478 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-3
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
5/8/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 66.1 82.8 45.7 70.4 69.4 67.1 65.2 62.5 5/8/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 68.6 92.7 46.1 77.2 71.3 67.7 66.2 62.9 5/8/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 67.0 84.1 50.4 70.5 69.5 68.3 66.7 63.2 5/8/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 67.3 82.8 50.0 72.2 70.4 68.8 65.4 61.5 5/8/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 69.3 95.0 50.2 75.0 72.6 69.3 67.8 63.4 5/8/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 68.7 95.8 49.7 74.9 71.0 68.9 66.8 63.0 5/8/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 68.0 85.7 52.3 72.2 70.9 69.2 67.3 62.5 5/8/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 67.1 88.0 50.3 71.1 70.0 68.2 66.2 62.4 5/8/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 66.3 87.5 49.9 70.3 68.5 67.1 65.6 61.5 5/8/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 64.8 85.9 47.3 69.8 68.3 65.0 63.9 61.2 5/8/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 68.1 101.8 43.0 73.6 69.8 65.7 63.5 60.5 5/8/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 64.9 91.6 38.3 69.3 66.6 64.7 63.1 59.2 5/8/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 62.9 84.2 37.8 66.8 65.8 63.7 62.3 57.2 5/9/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 61.3 80.7 34.4 65.8 64.9 62.6 60.0 54.8 5/9/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 60.2 81.4 31.9 65.6 63.9 61.2 59.1 53.1 5/9/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 60.5 85.9 32.5 66.5 64.2 61.4 59.0 52.6 5/9/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 63.5 91.0 36.7 68.0 66.3 64.1 61.5 56.3 5/9/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 66.3 93.5 44.9 72.4 67.4 65.8 64.1 60.4 5/9/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 67.2 87.9 49.8 71.4 69.1 68.0 66.2 63.8 5/9/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 67.9 85.9 51.9 71.5 70.1 69.1 67.4 64.3 5/9/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 67.7 86.7 52.1 71.8 70.0 68.7 67.4 63.8 5/9/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 67.7 95.3 49.9 72.7 70.2 67.8 65.7 63.1 5/9/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 67.7 88.2 48.0 71.9 70.7 68.5 67.0 62.9 5/9/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 67.0 87.2 44.2 72.1 71.6 67.8 64.9 59.1 CNEL: 71.7
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 5

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3479 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-3
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

66.1 68.6 67.0 67.3

69.3 68.7 68.0 67.1 66.3 64.8

68.1 64.9

62.9 61.3 60.2 60.5

63.5 66.3 67.2 67.9 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.0

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 5

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3480 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-3
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 5

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3481 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: State St & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Date: 5/8/2019 to 5/9/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3168 Site Topo:

Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:

Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: LT-4
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of State St is 50ft from meter
C/L of Ramona Exp. is 50ft from meter
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along State St and Ramona Exp.

Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-4 Monitoring Location
Figure 2: LT-4 Photo 4
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 14

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3482 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: State St & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-4
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
5/8/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 68.0 90.4 51.4 75.6 70.5 67.9 66.2 63.2 5/8/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 68.0 90.6 52.0 74.0 71.2 67.4 66.0 64.0 5/8/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 69.3 94.4 53.1 75.8 71.7 68.3 66.8 64.2 5/8/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 68.4 89.6 54.0 73.8 70.0 68.8 67.6 64.8 5/8/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 71.3 97.8 54.8 80.0 71.4 68.8 67.4 65.1 5/8/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 70.2 95.3 53.9 75.8 70.9 68.7 67.6 65.5 5/8/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 68.4 87.0 55.3 74.3 71.7 68.5 66.6 65.1 5/8/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 67.2 89.1 53.5 71.2 69.1 67.4 66.1 64.3 5/8/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 66.0 86.2 51.7 69.8 68.8 66.0 65.0 63.5 5/8/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 66.2 85.0 50.4 72.9 70.0 66.0 64.1 62.1 5/8/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 64.9 88.8 46.6 68.9 67.8 64.6 63.5 61.1 5/8/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 63.6 83.9 43.2 68.5 67.2 63.7 61.8 58.9 5/8/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 68.2 95.6 39.6 72.5 66.4 63.9 60.6 57.0 5/9/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 62.9 85.2 39.1 72.1 66.0 61.0 59.8 55.7 5/9/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 59.7 77.7 35.5 63.5 62.6 60.3 59.2 54.9 5/9/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 73.1 101.7 36.8 79.5 66.0 62.8 60.5 55.0 5/9/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 65.8 87.5 39.7 73.7 68.9 64.6 63.0 58.5 5/9/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 67.5 84.7 48.4 71.7 70.8 68.4 66.2 63.0 5/9/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 69.4 94.8 50.1 73.6 71.4 69.3 67.4 64.1 5/9/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 68.6 88.7 51.5 70.7 70.1 69.3 68.2 65.9 5/9/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 67.9 84.0 53.3 71.9 70.5 68.9 66.8 65.2 5/9/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 67.7 85.0 52.1 72.1 70.8 67.9 66.7 64.5 5/9/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 67.3 82.5 52.7 71.8 69.4 68.3 65.9 63.9 5/9/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 66.8 86.1 52.2 72.2 69.6 67.4 65.6 63.3 CNEL: 74.6
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 14

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3483 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: State St & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-4
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

68.0 68.0 69.3 68.4

71.3 70.2

68.4 67.2 66.0 66.2 64.9 63.6

68.2 62.9

59.7 73.1

65.8 67.5

69.4 68.6 67.9 67.7 67.3 66.8

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 14

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3484 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: State St & Ramona Exp, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-4
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 14

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3485 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St, San Jacinto, CA Date: 5/8/2019 to 5/9/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3713 Site Topo:

Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:

Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: LT-5
Figure 2: LT-5 Photo
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of San Jacinto Ave. is 20ft from meter
C/L of 7th St. Ave. is 135ft from meter
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along San Jacinto Ave and 7th St.

Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-5 Monitoring Location
5 24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 21

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3486 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-5
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
5/8/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 65.2 80.6 51.9 68.9 67.6 66.1 64.7 62.2 5/8/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 67.1 89.6 52.2 75.3 68.9 66.7 64.4 61.2 5/8/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 65.9 83.0 53.5 69.7 68.8 66.7 65.0 61.8 5/8/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 66.8 87.1 53.3 71.8 70.7 67.3 65.3 61.9 5/8/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 66.9 90.0 52.5 74.2 70.8 67.0 64.5 61.2 5/8/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 66.2 84.7 52.4 72.7 68.9 66.7 64.6 62.3 5/8/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 65.9 92.3 51.2 71.0 66.7 65.3 63.9 62.3 5/8/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 63.9 82.5 45.7 68.6 66.1 64.4 62.6 60.7 5/8/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 62.3 83.8 46.8 66.9 65.0 62.4 61.2 59.1 5/8/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 62.5 85.4 41.4 69.2 64.8 63.0 60.3 56.2 5/8/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 59.5 77.4 39.5 64.6 62.5 60.6 58.9 54.1 5/9/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 61.3 88.4 35.9 69.0 64.0 59.4 56.9 49.6 5/9/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 61.9 93.5 38.0 66.3 60.8 57.7 54.6 46.0 5/9/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 56.7 82.6 37.1 61.2 59.7 56.7 53.8 41.9 5/9/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 59.3 75.9 39.0 64.3 62.8 61.3 57.4 51.3 5/9/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 59.9 74.1 39.8 63.6 62.9 61.4 59.3 54.4 5/9/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 65.3 86.8 43.6 73.8 69.7 64.6 62.3 57.4 5/9/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 63.8 83.0 45.4 68.0 66.8 64.6 62.9 58.8 5/9/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 65.1 84.5 52.0 69.9 67.4 65.7 64.6 61.5 5/9/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 65.2 86.0 51.1 69.0 67.9 65.8 64.4 62.1 5/9/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 66.3 90.3 53.5 70.5 68.8 66.6 65.1 62.1 5/9/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 65.3 86.4 50.0 69.7 68.9 65.4 64.1 61.3 5/9/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 66.5 90.7 51.3 73.2 69.0 66.2 64.2 61.0 5/9/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 70.2 97.4 51.7 77.4 70.8 67.0 64.4 62.2 CNEL: 69.2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 21

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3487 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-5
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

65.2 67.1 65.9 66.8 66.9 66.2 65.9

63.9 62.3 62.5

59.5 61.3 61.9

56.7 59.3 59.9

65.3 63.8 65.1 65.2 66.3 65.3 66.5

70.2 0.0

10.0 20.0

30.0 40.0

50.0 60.0

70.0 80.0 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 21

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3488 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-5
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 21

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3489 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Site Observations:

Site Address/Location: Hewitt St & Commonwealth Ave, San Jacinto, CA Date: 5/1/2019 to 5/2/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:

Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3715 Site Topo:

Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:

Meteorological Con.: Cloudy sky w/ slight rain
Site ID: LT-6
Figure 2: LT-6 Photo
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Hewitt St. is 10ft from meter
C/L of Commonwealth Ave. is 140ft from meter
Cloudy sky w/ slight rain, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Hewitt St and Commonwealth Ave.

Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:

Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-6 Monitoring Location
6 24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 26

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3490 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Hewitt St & Commonwealth Ave, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-6
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
5/1/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 82.5 110.9 45.1 86.7 70.7 69.3 67.9 65.1 5/1/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 69.5 84.8 49.5 73.4 71.8 70.4 69.0 66.9 5/1/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 69.0 87.6 45.2 74.3 71.1 69.7 68.4 65.3 5/1/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 69.4 89.2 47.5 73.9 70.9 69.4 68.2 66.0 5/1/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 69.2 85.6 45.8 72.7 71.4 70.1 68.6 66.2 5/1/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 67.8 83.1 44.2 71.7 70.1 68.4 67.3 65.2 5/1/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 67.8 88.0 41.5 73.8 70.4 68.5 66.7 64.3 5/2/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 66.2 88.6 42.1 70.8 68.6 66.9 65.6 62.3 5/2/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 64.7 79.9 38.3 69.7 68.0 65.7 64.0 59.0 5/2/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 63.0 81.2 30.8 67.7 66.5 64.6 62.2 54.4 5/2/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 61.7 77.1 28.0 66.5 65.0 63.6 60.5 47.9 5/2/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 68.3 99.6 28.2 77.8 65.2 61.6 57.5 34.9 5/2/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 58.9 81.2 26.6 65.8 64.4 60.4 52.7 30.5 5/2/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 60.1 80.7 28.2 66.7 65.0 62.2 56.4 32.8 5/2/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 62.7 80.0 31.3 67.8 66.6 64.8 61.4 42.1 5/2/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 65.7 87.4 32.5 69.5 68.5 67.3 65.3 56.1 5/2/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 66.6 86.1 36.3 70.7 69.3 67.0 65.8 60.6 5/2/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 70.9 98.4 42.5 72.6 71.4 69.8 69.0 65.9 5/2/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 68.9 82.2 44.8 71.2 70.8 69.6 68.7 66.6 5/2/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 68.3 83.4 39.2 72.0 70.3 69.2 68.0 65.0 5/2/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 68.1 88.4 43.7 73.2 70.5 68.6 67.0 64.6 5/2/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 67.3 84.2 42.5 70.4 70.0 68.1 66.9 63.8 5/2/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 67.5 79.7 42.2 70.6 69.8 68.2 67.2 64.8 5/2/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 69.0 91.8 46.0 76.2 69.8 68.4 67.0 64.5 CNEL: 73.9
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 26

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3491 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Hewitt St & Commonwealth Ave, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-6
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.

82.5 69.5 69.0 69.4 69.2 67.8 67.8 66.2 64.7 63.0 61.7

68.3 58.9 60.1

62.7 65.7 66.6

70.9 68.9 68.3 68.1 67.3 67.5 69.0

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 26

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3492 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621801 San Jacinto GP Noise LTMS Day: 1 of 1 Site Address/Location: Hewitt St & Commonwealth Ave, San Jacinto, CA Site ID: LT-6
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
24Hr Field Sheet LTNM 26

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3493 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix C:

FHWA Roadway Noise Worksheets

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3494 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3495 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Warren Road DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,778 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,178 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.734 0.082 0.184 0.901 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 49.7 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.745 0.048 0.207 0.069 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 49.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.718 0.068 0.214 0.030 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 49.7 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 70.2 68.1 64.6 63.3 70.7 71.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 66.2 64.1 58.2 59.8 67.0 67.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 66.5 64.3 60.1 60.3 67.4 67.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.8 70.7 66.6 66.2 73.4 73.7

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 117 369 1167 3689
LDN 110 349 1105 3493

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3496 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cawston Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 30 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 36 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 310 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.771 0.113 0.116 0.958 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 46.7 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.803 0.073 0.124 0.038 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 46.7 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.844 0.000 0.156 0.003 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 46.7 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 57.4 55.5 53.2 48.5 56.7 57.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.0 52.3 47.9 45.4 53.5 53.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.9 47.3 21.1 41.3 48.9 48.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.4 57.6 54.3 50.8 58.8 59.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 4 13 42 133
LDN 4 12 38 121

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3497 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT South of Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 19,520 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,952 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.777 0.119 0.105 0.978 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 42.5 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.778 0.126 0.096 0.022 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 42.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.636 0.000 0.364 0.001 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 42.5 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.0 69.1 66.9 61.6 70.0 70.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.7 60.8 58.9 53.0 61.6 62.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.9 48.2 23.1 47.0 53.4 53.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.6 69.7 67.6 62.3 70.7 71.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 66 210 664 2100
LDN 59 186 587 1856

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3498 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Cawston ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 530 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.734 0.082 0.184 0.901 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 48.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.745 0.048 0.207 0.069 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 48.5 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.718 0.068 0.214 0.030 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 48.6 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.7 63.5 60.1 58.8 66.1 66.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.2 60.1 54.2 55.8 62.9 63.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.8 60.5 56.3 56.5 63.6 63.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.6 66.4 62.3 62.0 69.2 69.5

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 44 139 441 1393
LDN 42 132 418 1320

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3499 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cawston to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 675 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.3 63.2 59.7 58.4 65.7 66.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.4 60.4 54.5 56.0 63.2 63.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.3 61.1 56.9 57.0 64.2 64.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.6 66.5 62.3 62.0 69.3 69.5

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 44 141 445 1406
LDN 42 133 422 1334

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3500 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 44 141 445 1406
LDN 42 133 422 1334

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3501 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 44 141 445 1406
LDN 42 133 422 1334

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3502 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Cawston ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 580 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.777 0.119 0.105 0.978 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 49.7 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.778 0.126 0.096 0.022 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 49.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.636 0.000 0.364 0.001 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 49.7 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.5 61.6 59.5 54.2 62.6 63.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.0 54.1 52.2 46.2 54.9 55.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.5 41.7 16.7 40.6 47.0 47.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.3 62.4 60.2 55.0 63.4 63.9

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 12 39 123 390
LDN 11 34 109 344

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3503 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cawston to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 680 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.2 62.3 60.2 54.9 63.3 63.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.6 54.8 52.9 46.9 55.5 56.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.2 42.4 17.4 41.3 47.7 47.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.0 63.1 60.9 55.7 64.1 64.6

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 14 46 144 457
LDN 13 40 128 404

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3504 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,550 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 955 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.7 63.8 61.7 56.3 64.8 65.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.1 56.2 54.4 48.4 57.0 57.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.7 43.9 18.9 42.7 49.2 49.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.4 64.5 62.4 57.2 65.5 66.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 20 64 203 641
LDN 18 57 179 567

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3505 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 13,350 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,335 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.3 67.4 65.3 60.0 68.4 68.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.1 59.2 57.3 51.3 60.0 60.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.3 46.5 21.5 45.3 51.8 51.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.9 68.0 65.9 60.6 69.0 69.6

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 45 144 454 1436
LDN 40 127 401 1270

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3506 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,840 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 70.7 68.8 66.7 61.3 69.8 70.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.4 60.6 58.7 52.7 61.4 61.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.7 47.9 22.9 46.7 53.2 53.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.3 69.4 67.3 62.0 70.4 71.0

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 63 198 626 1980
LDN 55 175 553 1750

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3507 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Hewitt ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,150 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,515 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.8 68.0 65.8 60.5 68.9 69.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.6 59.7 57.8 51.9 60.5 61.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.8 47.1 22.0 45.9 52.3 52.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.5 68.6 66.5 61.2 69.6 70.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 52 163 515 1630
LDN 46 144 456 1441

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3508 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Hewitt to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,550 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 955 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.8 66.0 63.8 58.5 66.9 67.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.6 57.7 55.8 49.9 58.5 59.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.8 45.1 20.0 43.9 50.3 50.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.5 66.6 64.5 59.2 67.6 68.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 32 103 325 1027
LDN 29 91 287 908

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3509 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Gilman Springs Road DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,486 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,549 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.771 0.113 0.116 0.958 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 49.7 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.803 0.073 0.124 0.038 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 49.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.844 0.000 0.156 0.003 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 49.7 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.2 67.3 65.0 60.3 68.5 69.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.5 61.8 57.3 54.9 63.0 63.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 57.2 55.7 29.4 49.6 57.2 57.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.4 68.6 65.6 61.7 69.8 70.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 53 167 527 1666
LDN 48 151 477 1509

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3510 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Hewitt Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Evans to Park ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 10,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,070 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.771 0.113 0.116 0.958 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 42.5 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.803 0.073 0.124 0.038 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 42.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.844 0.000 0.156 0.003 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 42.5 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.3 66.3 64.0 59.4 67.6 68.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.6 60.8 56.4 54.0 62.0 62.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.3 54.7 28.5 48.7 56.3 56.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.5 67.6 64.7 60.7 68.9 69.3

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 43 135 426 1347
LDN 39 122 386 1220

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3511 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Lyon Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT North of Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 30 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 30 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 47.1 45.2 43.0 37.7 46.1 46.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 41.1 39.3 37.4 31.4 40.0 40.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 30.5 27.7 2.7 26.6 33.0 33.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 48.1 46.2 44.1 38.9 47.3 47.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 1 3 10
LDN 0 1 3 8

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3512 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Lyon Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Ramona Blvd. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,500 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 450 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.2 63.3 61.2 55.9 64.3 64.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.4 54.5 52.6 46.6 55.3 55.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.3 41.5 16.5 40.4 46.8 46.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.8 63.9 61.7 56.5 64.9 65.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 55 174 550
LDN 15 49 154 486

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3513 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Lyon Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Blvd. to De Anza ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 55 174 550
LDN 15 49 154 486

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3514 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Lyon Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT De Anza to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,350 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 535 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.6 64.8 62.6 57.3 65.7 66.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.8 55.9 54.0 48.1 56.7 57.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.7 43.0 17.9 41.8 48.2 48.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.2 65.3 63.2 57.9 66.3 66.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 24 76 242 765
LDN 21 68 214 676

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3515 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Lyon Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,550 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 555 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.8 64.9 62.8 57.5 65.9 66.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.0 56.1 54.2 48.2 56.9 57.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.9 43.1 18.1 41.9 48.4 48.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.4 65.5 63.3 58.1 66.5 67.0

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 25 79 251 793
LDN 22 70 222 701

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3516 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Lyon Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 670 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.6 65.7 63.6 58.3 66.7 67.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.8 56.9 55.0 49.1 57.7 58.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.7 43.9 18.9 42.8 49.2 49.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.2 66.3 64.2 58.9 67.3 67.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 30 96 303 957
LDN 27 85 268 846

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3517 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Main Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,925 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 493 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.771 0.113 0.116 0.958 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 48.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.803 0.073 0.124 0.038 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 48.5 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.844 0.000 0.156 0.003 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 48.6 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.8 60.9 58.6 53.9 62.1 62.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.8 56.1 51.7 49.2 57.3 57.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.8 50.3 24.1 44.2 51.9 51.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.3 62.4 59.4 55.5 63.7 64.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 13 40 128 404
LDN 12 37 116 367

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3518 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Main Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expressway to Soboba ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 8,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 865 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.9 63.9 61.6 57.0 65.2 65.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.9 59.1 54.7 52.3 60.3 60.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.9 53.3 27.1 47.3 54.9 54.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.3 65.4 62.4 58.6 66.7 67.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 26 81 257 812
LDN 23 74 233 737

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3519 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Menlo Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sante Fe to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 8,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 820 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.3 61.3 59.0 54.4 62.6 63.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.0 57.3 52.9 50.4 58.5 58.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.4 51.9 25.6 45.8 53.4 53.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.0 63.1 60.0 56.3 64.4 64.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 15 48 150 475
LDN 14 43 137 433

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3520 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Palm Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Blvd to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 420 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.7 60.8 58.5 53.8 62.0 62.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.7 56.0 51.5 49.1 57.2 57.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.7 50.2 24.0 44.1 51.7 51.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.2 62.3 59.3 55.4 63.5 64.0

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 12 39 125 394
LDN 11 36 113 358

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3521 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT West of Warren ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 22,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,220 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.679 0.104 0.217 0.968 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 49.7 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.685 0.064 0.251 0.024 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 49.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.684 0.042 0.274 0.008 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 49.7 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.3 70.8 68.7 67.1 74.2 74.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 64.4 62.0 57.7 58.9 65.8 65.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.5 61.0 55.0 58.3 65.1 65.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 74.2 71.7 69.2 68.2 75.2 75.5

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 177 561 1774 5609
LDN 166 525 1662 5254

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3522 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 23,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,375 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.679 0.104 0.217 0.968 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 42.5 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.685 0.064 0.251 0.024 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 42.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.684 0.042 0.274 0.008 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 42.5 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.4 73.9 71.8 70.2 77.3 77.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 66.5 64.1 59.8 61.0 67.9 68.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.1 62.7 56.6 59.9 66.7 66.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 77.1 74.6 72.2 71.0 78.1 78.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 342 1082 3420 10816
LDN 320 1011 3199 10115

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3523 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 27,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 78 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,705 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.679 0.104 0.217 0.968 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 31.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.685 0.064 0.251 0.024 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 31.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.684 0.042 0.274 0.008 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 31.4 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 78.2 75.8 73.6 72.1 79.1 79.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 68.4 66.0 61.7 62.9 69.8 69.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 67.0 64.5 58.5 61.8 68.6 68.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.0 76.5 74.0 72.9 79.9 80.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 527 1666 5269 16662
LDN 493 1558 4927 15582

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3524 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 78 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,505 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.8 73.3 71.2 69.6 76.7 77.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 67.0 64.5 60.2 61.4 68.3 68.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 66.0 63.5 57.5 60.8 67.6 67.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 76.7 74.3 71.7 70.7 77.7 78.0

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 317 1002 3168 10017
LDN 297 938 2967 9383

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3525 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 20,150 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,015 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.6 71.1 69.0 67.4 74.5 74.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 64.7 62.3 58.0 59.1 66.0 66.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.7 61.3 55.2 58.6 65.3 65.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 74.5 72.0 69.5 68.5 75.5 75.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 188 596 1884 5957
LDN 176 558 1765 5580

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3526 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Main/Lake Park ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 10,850 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,085 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.0 70.5 68.4 66.8 73.9 74.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.1 60.7 56.4 57.6 64.5 64.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 61.7 59.3 53.2 56.5 63.3 63.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.7 71.2 68.7 67.6 74.7 74.9

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 156 494 1563 4941
LDN 146 462 1461 4621

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3527 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Main/Lake Park to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,100 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.679 0.104 0.217 0.968 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 48.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.685 0.064 0.251 0.024 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 48.5 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.684 0.042 0.274 0.008 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 48.6 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 70.3 67.9 65.7 64.2 71.2 71.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.5 59.1 54.8 55.9 62.8 63.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 60.5 58.1 52.0 55.3 62.1 62.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.3 68.8 66.2 65.2 72.3 72.5

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 90 284 899 2842
LDN 84 266 842 2662

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3528 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 90 284 899 2842
LDN 84 266 842 2662

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3529 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Esplanade to Hemet ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,250 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,625 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.9 69.5 67.3 65.8 72.8 73.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.1 60.6 56.4 57.5 64.4 64.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.1 59.7 53.6 56.9 63.7 63.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.9 70.4 67.8 66.8 73.9 74.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 130 411 1298 4106
LDN 122 385 1216 3846

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3530 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Main/Ramona Blvd. to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 12,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,265 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.777 0.119 0.105 0.978 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 48.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.778 0.126 0.096 0.022 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 48.5 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.636 0.000 0.364 0.001 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 48.6 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.0 65.1 63.0 57.7 66.1 66.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.4 57.6 55.7 49.7 58.3 58.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.0 45.2 20.2 44.1 50.5 50.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.8 65.9 63.7 58.5 66.9 67.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 27 87 275 869
LDN 24 77 243 768

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3531 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,860 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.3 67.4 65.2 59.9 68.3 68.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.7 59.8 57.9 52.0 60.6 61.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.2 47.5 22.5 46.3 52.8 52.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.0 68.1 66.0 60.7 69.1 69.7

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 46 146 462 1462
LDN 41 129 409 1292

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3532 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT South of Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,546 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,155 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.9 68.0 65.9 60.6 69.0 69.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.3 60.5 58.6 52.6 61.2 61.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.9 48.1 23.1 46.9 53.4 53.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.7 68.8 66.6 61.4 69.8 70.3

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 54 169 535 1693
LDN 47 150 473 1497

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3533 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT North of Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 13,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,300 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.734 0.082 0.184 0.901 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 42.5 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.745 0.048 0.207 0.069 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 42.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.718 0.068 0.214 0.030 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 42.5 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.3 69.2 65.7 64.4 71.8 72.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 67.3 65.2 59.4 60.9 68.1 68.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 67.6 65.4 61.2 61.4 68.5 68.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.9 71.8 67.7 67.3 74.6 74.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 151 476 1507 4765
LDN 143 451 1427 4512

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3534 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Ramona Blvd. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 23,515 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,352 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.9 71.8 68.3 67.0 74.4 74.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 69.9 67.8 61.9 63.5 70.7 70.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 70.2 68.0 63.8 64.0 71.1 71.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 76.5 74.4 70.3 69.9 77.1 77.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 273 862 2725 8619
LDN 258 816 2581 8161

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3535 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 273 862 2725 8619
LDN 258 816 2581 8161

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3536 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 28,500 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,850 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.8 72.6 69.1 67.9 75.2 75.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.7 68.7 62.8 64.3 71.5 71.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 71.0 68.8 64.6 64.8 71.9 72.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 77.4 75.2 71.1 70.7 78.0 78.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 330 1045 3303 10446
LDN 313 989 3128 9891

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3537 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 670 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.5 66.3 62.9 61.6 68.9 69.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 64.4 62.4 56.5 58.1 65.2 65.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.7 62.5 58.3 58.5 65.6 65.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.1 68.9 64.8 64.4 71.7 71.9

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 78 246 777 2456
LDN 74 233 735 2325

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3538 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Santa Fe DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Esplande to Menlo ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 780 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.7 62.8 60.5 55.8 64.0 64.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.7 58.0 53.6 51.1 59.2 59.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.7 52.2 26.0 46.1 53.8 53.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.2 64.3 61.3 57.4 65.6 66.0

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 20 63 198 626
LDN 18 57 180 568

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3539 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Soboba Road DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to Main ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 630 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.8 65.9 63.6 58.9 67.1 67.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.9 59.2 54.8 52.4 60.4 60.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.1 52.6 26.3 46.5 54.1 54.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.7 66.9 64.1 60.0 68.1 68.5

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 36 113 358 1131
LDN 32 102 323 1022

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3540 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT West of Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 965 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.1 65.2 62.9 58.2 66.4 66.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.4 59.7 55.3 52.8 60.9 61.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.1 53.6 27.4 47.5 55.2 55.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.4 66.5 63.6 59.6 67.7 68.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 33 104 328 1038
LDN 30 94 297 940

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3541 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 630 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.0 64.0 61.7 57.1 65.3 65.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.3 58.5 54.1 51.7 59.7 60.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.0 52.4 26.2 46.4 54.0 54.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.2 65.3 62.4 58.4 66.6 67.0

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 25 79 251 793
LDN 23 72 227 718

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3542 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 965 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.2 65.3 63.0 58.3 66.5 67.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.5 59.8 55.4 52.9 61.0 61.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.2 53.7 27.5 47.6 55.2 55.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.5 66.6 63.7 59.7 67.8 68.3

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 34 106 336 1061
LDN 30 96 304 961

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3543 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 30 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,120 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.4 61.5 59.2 54.5 62.7 63.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.0 58.3 53.9 51.4 59.5 59.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.8 53.3 27.1 47.2 54.9 54.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.4 63.6 60.3 56.7 64.8 65.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 53 167 527
LDN 15 48 152 482

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3544 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Hewitt ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 8,500 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 30 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 850 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.6 59.7 57.4 52.7 60.9 61.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.2 56.5 52.1 49.6 57.7 58.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.1 51.5 25.3 45.5 53.1 53.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.6 61.8 58.5 55.0 63.1 63.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 11 35 111 350
LDN 10 32 101 320

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3545 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Hewitt to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,550 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 25 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 955 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.7 57.8 55.5 50.8 59.0 59.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.4 55.7 51.2 48.8 56.9 57.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 52.7 51.2 25.0 45.1 52.8 52.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.2 60.4 56.9 53.6 61.7 62.1

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 25 80 254
LDN 7 23 74 233

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3546 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT College Entrance to Community College ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 14,950 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,495 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.1 67.2 65.1 59.8 68.2 68.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.9 59.0 57.1 51.1 59.8 60.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.1 46.3 21.3 45.1 51.6 51.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.8 67.9 65.7 60.5 68.9 69.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 43 137 435 1375
LDN 38 122 384 1215

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3547 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Community College to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,665 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.6 67.7 65.5 60.2 68.7 69.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.3 59.4 57.6 51.6 60.2 60.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.6 46.8 21.8 45.6 52.1 52.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.2 68.3 66.2 60.9 69.3 69.9

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 48 153 484 1531
LDN 43 135 428 1353

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3548 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Ramona Blvd. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 22,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,205 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.5 69.6 67.4 62.1 70.6 71.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.2 61.4 59.5 53.5 62.1 62.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.5 48.7 23.7 47.5 54.0 54.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.1 70.2 68.1 62.8 71.2 71.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 75 237 750 2372
LDN 66 210 663 2097

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3549 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Blvd. to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 19,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,965 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.0 69.1 66.9 61.6 70.1 70.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.7 60.8 59.0 53.0 61.6 62.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.0 48.2 23.2 47.0 53.5 53.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.6 69.7 67.6 62.3 70.7 71.3

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 67 211 669 2114
LDN 59 187 591 1869

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3550 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,550 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 555 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.5 63.6 61.5 56.1 64.6 65.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.2 55.4 53.5 47.5 56.1 56.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.5 42.7 17.7 41.5 48.0 48.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.1 64.2 62.1 56.8 65.2 65.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 19 60 189 597
LDN 17 53 167 528

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3551 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 670 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.3 64.4 62.3 57.0 65.4 65.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.1 56.2 54.3 48.3 57.0 57.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.3 43.5 18.5 42.3 48.8 48.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.9 65.1 62.9 57.7 66.1 66.6

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 23 72 228 721
LDN 20 64 201 637

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3552 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Warren Road DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: Existing

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 117 369 1167 3689
LDN 110 349 1105 3493

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3553 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,667 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 30 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 36 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 967 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.755 0.140 0.104 0.920 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 46.7 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.480 0.020 0.500 0.030 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 46.7 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.480 0.020 0.500 0.050 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 46.7 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.2 60.1 58.8 52.8 61.2 61.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.9 53.9 46.1 55.3 61.5 61.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.8 61.8 54.0 63.2 69.4 69.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.8 64.4 60.2 64.2 70.5 70.7

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 184 582 1840
LDN 57 179 567 1795

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3554 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Cawston ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 12,438 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,244 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.755 0.140 0.104 0.920 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 42.5 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.480 0.020 0.500 0.030 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 42.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.480 0.020 0.500 0.050 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 42.5 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.7 66.7 65.4 59.4 67.8 68.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.1 58.2 50.4 59.6 65.8 65.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 68.9 64.9 57.1 66.3 72.5 72.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.3 69.3 66.1 67.8 74.4 74.6

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 143 452 1430 4522
LDN 137 435 1374 4346

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3555 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 22,568 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,257 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.8 71.8 70.5 64.5 72.9 73.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 66.1 62.1 54.3 63.5 69.7 69.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 72.3 68.3 60.5 69.7 75.9 75.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 76.5 73.7 71.0 71.6 78.3 78.5

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 354 1121 3544 11206
LDN 337 1066 3372 10665

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3556 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 184 582 1840
LDN 57 179 567 1795

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3557 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 184 582 1840
LDN 57 179 567 1795

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3558 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Hewitt ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 184 582 1840
LDN 57 179 567 1795

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3559 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Hewitt to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 184 582 1840
LDN 57 179 567 1795

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3560 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Community College to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 26,714 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,671 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 72.0 70.0 68.7 62.7 71.1 71.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 65.5 61.5 53.7 62.9 69.1 69.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 72.2 68.2 60.4 69.6 75.8 75.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 75.6 72.6 69.5 71.1 77.7 77.9

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 307 971 3071 9712
LDN 295 933 2952 9334

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3561 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Ramona Blvd. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 37,777 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,778 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.6 71.5 70.3 64.2 72.6 73.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 67.0 63.0 55.2 64.4 70.6 70.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 73.7 69.7 61.9 71.1 77.3 77.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 77.1 74.1 71.0 72.7 79.2 79.4

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 434 1373 4343 13733
LDN 417 1320 4174 13200

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3562 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Blvd. to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 434 1373 4343 13733
LDN 417 1320 4174 13200

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3563 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 434 1373 4343 13733
LDN 417 1320 4174 13200

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3564 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 434 1373 4343 13733
LDN 417 1320 4174 13200

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3565 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY State Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Esplande to Crow's Nest ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,912 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,591 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.9 69.9 68.6 62.6 71.0 71.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 65.3 61.4 53.6 62.8 68.9 69.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 72.1 68.1 60.3 69.5 75.7 75.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 75.4 72.5 69.3 71.0 77.6 77.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 298 942 2979 9420
LDN 286 905 2863 9054

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3566 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Warren Road DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,372 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 55 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 537 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.6 65.6 64.3 58.2 66.7 67.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.9 55.9 48.1 57.3 63.5 63.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 66.0 62.1 54.3 63.5 69.6 69.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.3 67.5 64.8 65.4 72.1 72.3

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 84 267 844 2667
LDN 80 254 803 2539

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3567 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Warren Road DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 84 267 844 2667
LDN 80 254 803 2539

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3568 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cawston to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 143 452 1430 4522
LDN 137 435 1374 4346

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3569 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 143 452 1430 4522
LDN 137 435 1374 4346

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3570 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Cottonwood Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 143 452 1430 4522
LDN 137 435 1374 4346

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3571 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Cawston ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 14,997 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,500 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.1 66.1 64.8 58.7 67.1 67.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.2 58.2 50.4 59.6 65.8 65.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.2 65.2 57.5 66.7 72.8 72.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.2 69.1 65.6 68.0 74.5 74.6

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3572 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cawston to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3573 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3574 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3575 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3576 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Hewitt ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3577 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Esplanade Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Hewitt to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 145 460 1454 4599
LDN 140 444 1405 4443

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3578 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Main Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Ramona Expwy. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,986 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 40 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,899 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 69.1 67.1 65.8 59.7 68.2 68.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.2 59.2 51.4 60.6 66.8 66.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 70.2 66.3 58.5 67.7 73.8 73.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.2 70.1 66.7 69.0 75.5 75.7

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 184 582 1841 5822
LDN 178 562 1779 5624

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3579 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT West of Warren ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 34,141 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 78 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,414 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.755 0.140 0.104 0.920 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 31.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.480 0.020 0.500 0.030 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 31.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.480 0.020 0.500 0.050 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 31.4 0.0

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 79.0 77.0 75.7 69.7 78.1 78.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.3 66.4 58.6 67.8 73.9 74.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 76.0 72.1 64.3 73.5 79.6 79.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.2 78.5 76.1 75.8 82.6 82.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 962 3044 9625 30436
LDN 907 2869 9074 28695

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3580 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 962 3044 9625 30436
LDN 907 2869 9074 28695

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3581 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Sanderson to Lyon ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 962 3044 9625 30436
LDN 907 2869 9074 28695

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3582 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Lyon to State ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 962 3044 9625 30436
LDN 907 2869 9074 28695

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3583 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT State to San Jacinto ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 46,217 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 78 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,622 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 80.3 78.3 77.0 71.0 79.4 80.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.7 67.7 59.9 69.1 75.3 75.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 77.4 73.4 65.6 74.8 81.0 81.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 82.5 79.8 77.4 77.1 83.9 84.2

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1303 4120 13029 41201
LDN 1228 3884 12284 38845

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3584 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT San Jacinto to Main/Lake Park ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1303 4120 13029 41201
LDN 1228 3884 12284 38845

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3585 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Main/Lake Park to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1303 4120 13029 41201
LDN 1228 3884 12284 38845

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3586 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1303 4120 13029 41201
LDN 1228 3884 12284 38845

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3587 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Ramona Expressway DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Esplanade to Hemet ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 10,787 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 78 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,079 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.0 72.0 70.7 64.7 73.1 73.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 65.3 61.4 53.6 62.8 68.9 69.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 71.0 67.1 59.3 68.5 74.6 74.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 76.2 73.5 71.1 70.7 77.6 77.8

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 304 962 3041 9616
LDN 287 907 2867 9066

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3588 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expy. to Main/Ramona Blvd. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 50
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 53 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 50 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,570 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.9 69.9 68.6 62.5 71.0 71.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 65.3 61.3 53.5 62.7 68.9 68.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 72.0 68.1 60.3 69.5 75.6 75.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 75.4 72.4 69.3 71.0 77.5 77.7

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 295 934 2954 9343
LDN 284 898 2840 8980

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3589 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Main/Ramona Blvd. to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 295 934 2954 9343
LDN 284 898 2840 8980

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3590 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT 7th to Esplanade ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 295 934 2954 9343
LDN 284 898 2840 8980

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3591 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY San Jacinto Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Esplande to Menlo Ave ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 295 934 2954 9343
LDN 284 898 2840 8980

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3592 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Expwy. to Ramona Blvd. ENGINEER: C Pincock LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 354 1121 3544 11206
LDN 337 1066 3372 10665

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3593 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Ramona Blvd to Cottonwood ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 354 1121 3544 11206
LDN 337 1066 3372 10665

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3594 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY Sanderson Avenue DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Cottonwood to 7th ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 354 1121 3544 11206
LDN 337 1066 3372 10665

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3595 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: San Jacinto General Plan Noise Study JOB #: 0462-2018-01 ROADWAY 7th Street DATE: 28-Oct-21
SEGMENT Warren to Sanderson ENGINEER: C Pincock
LOCATION: City of San Jacinto, CA SCENARIO: 2040

NOISE INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 10 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 10 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 10 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 184 582 1840
LDN 57 179 567 1795

VEHICLE MIX DATA

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 3596 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix F - Noise Impact Study (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix G: Transportation Impact Analysis

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3597 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3598 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) October 7, 2021

SAN JACINTO GENERAL

PLAN UPDATE

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT

ANALYSIS

SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3599 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Inside front cover
Page Intentionally blank

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3600 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto General Plan
Update - Transportation Impact
Analysis
San Jacinto, California
Prepared for:

City of San Jacinto
595 S San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Prepared by:

Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
750 The City Drive, Suite 410
Orange, CA 92868
714.468.1997
Project Manager:

Mike Alston
Engineering Associate
Project Principal:

Tim Erney
Senior Principal Planner
Project Number 23272
October 7, 2021

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3601 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Page Intentionally blank

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3602 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................1 Significant Transportation Impacts....................................................................................1 Roadway Improvement Recommendations ...................................................................1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................3 Purpose of the Study and Objective.................................................................................3 Project Description..............................................................................................................3 Analysis Scenarios And Locations......................................................................................7 Regulatory Setting ..................................................................................................................9 Federal Regulations ............................................................................................................9 State Regulations ................................................................................................................9 Regional Regulations........................................................................................................12 Local Regulations..............................................................................................................12 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................15 Existing Roadway Network ...............................................................................................15 Bicycle Facilities.................................................................................................................17 Transit Service ....................................................................................................................21 Pedestrian Facilities...........................................................................................................24 Freight and Goods Movement........................................................................................25 Existing Traffic Conditions .................................................................................................27 Level of Service Analysis.......................................................................................................39 Traffic Volume Forecasting...............................................................................................39 Assumed Future Roadway Improvements......................................................................39 Roadway Segment Analysis.............................................................................................41 Intersection Analysis..........................................................................................................44 Transportation Impact Analysis............................................................................................52 Standards of Significance ................................................................................................52 Item 1: Conflict with Applicable Plan, Ordinance, or Policy ........................................52 Item 2: Vehicle Miles Traveled .........................................................................................54 Item 3: Geometric Design and Incompatible Use Hazards ..........................................56 Item 4: Emergency Access...............................................................................................57 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................59 Significant Transportation Impacts..................................................................................59 Roadway Improvement Recommendations .................................................................59

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3603 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto General Plan Update Transportation Impact Analysis October 7, 2021 List of Figures
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Vicinity Map..................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 2: 2006 General Plan Land Use .......................................................................................................................5 Figure 3: 2040 General Plan Update Proposed Land Use........................................................................................6 Figure 4: Existing Bicycle Facilities.............................................................................................................................20 Figure 5: Existing Transit Facilities...............................................................................................................................23 Figure 6: Truck Routes................................................................................................................................................26 Figure 7: Existing Roadway Volumes........................................................................................................................28 Figure 8: Location of Study Intersections.................................................................................................................34 Figure 9: Existing Traffic Volumes – AM and PM Peak Hour ...................................................................................35 Figure 10: Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Geometries ..........48 Figure 11: TMP Proposed Trails and Bicycle Facilities..............................................................................................55

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: 2040 Buildout Summary – Proposed Land Uses ..........................................................................................3 Table 2: San Jacinto General Plan Goals Relevant to Transportation and Traffic..............................................13 Table 3: Riverside Transit Agency Lines and Ridership ...........................................................................................21 Table 4: Pedestrian Facility Conditions in San Jacinto...........................................................................................24 Table 5: Existing (2019) Roadway Segment Volumes.............................................................................................27 Table 6: Updated Roadway Segment LOS Thresholds...........................................................................................29 Table 7: Roadway Level of Service..........................................................................................................................30 Table 8: Study Intersections.......................................................................................................................................31 Table 9: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Thresholds (HCM Methodology) ............................................32 Table 10: Existing (2019) Intersection Level of Service – Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours......................................32 Table 11: Roadway Level of Service........................................................................................................................42 Table 12: Future Intersection Level of Service – Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours...................................................45 Table 13: Cumulative (2040) VMT Comparison.......................................................................................................56

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Existing Traffic Count Data
Appendix B: Existing Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Appendix C: Assumed Future Roadway Improvements
Appendix D: Cumulative Plus Plan Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E: Cumulative Plus Plan (with Recommended Improvements) Intersection Level of Service Worksheets

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3604 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Executive Summary

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3605 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Executive Summary October 7, 2021 Page 1
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of San Jacinto (City) encompasses 26.1 square miles in Riverside County, California. The city is bordered by Hemet to the south and Beaumont to the north and is located at the north end of the San Jacinto Valley.

The City of San Jacinto 2040 General Plan Update, which is an update to the current (2006) San Jacinto General Plan, is intended to guide long-term growth, traffic patterns, housing, and resources conservation.

Table 1 outlines the land use designations and buildout projections for dwelling units, residents, nonresidential square footage, and employment proposed under the proposed General Plan Update. In total by 2040, the new General Plan would result in a buildout of approximately 30,600 housing units, 102,200 residents, 24,014,700 non-residential square feet, and 25,700 employees within the City’s boundaries.

Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (“Kittelson”) has prepared a transportation analysis of the Plan Update. Below is a summary of results of the transportation analysis conducted for the Plan Update, including any significant impact findings and recommended roadway improvements.

SIGNIFICANT TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) transportation impact analysis of the Plan found no significant impacts for the following topics:
• Conflict with Applicable Plans and Policies
• Vehicle Miles Traveled
• Design and Incompatible Use Safety Hazards
• Emergency Access

ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
In addition to the transportation analysis conducted under CEQA requirements, Kittelson analyzed roadway segment and intersection operations with Plan implementation, to address the City’s goal of providing satisfactory roadway operations and traffic flow within San Jacinto. Recommended improvements on these facilities, such as signalization or the restriping of approach lanes, were provided to accommodate long-term buildout of vehicular traffic and roadway classification categories. It is recommended that the City continue to monitor traffic volumes on these and other roadway facilities to determine the timing and extent of any improvements s development projects are implemented in the City.

The roadway segments with recommended improvements are:
• Ramona Expressway, east of State Street
• State Street, south of Ramona Expressway
The intersections with recommended improvements are:
• Warren Road & Esplanade Avenue
• Lyon Avenue & Ramona Expressway
• Lyon Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue
• Lyon Avenue & 7
th Street
• State Street & Community College Drive
• State Street & Ramona Expressway
• Cawston Avenue & Esplanade Avenue
• Lyon Avenue & Ramona Boulevard

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3606 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Introduction

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3607 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Introduction October 7, 2021 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY AND OBJECTIVE
This report documents the transportation impact analysis for the City of San Jacinto General Plan Update and summarizes the methodology, findings, and conclusions of the analysis.

The purpose of the study is to assess potentially significant impacts resulting from the implementation of the General Plan Update on the citywide transportation system and to identify measures to mitigate them, as well as provide recommendations for operational improvements. The study also serves as the basis for the transportation component of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that will be prepared for the General Plan Update.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of San Jacinto encompasses 26.1 square miles in Riverside County, California. The city is bordered by Hemet to the south and Beaumont to the north and is located at the north end of the San Jacinto Valley. The City of San Jacinto is shown in Figure 1.

Table 1 outlines the land use designations and buildout projections for dwelling units, residents, nonresidential square footage, and employment proposed under the proposed General Plan Update. In total, the General Plan would result in a buildout of approximately 30,600 housing units, 102,200 residents, 24,014,700 non-residential square feet, and 25,700 employees within the City’s boundaries. The current General Plan and proposed land use maps are also included in Figure 2 and Figure 3.

Table 1: 2040 Summary – Proposed Land Uses
Land Use
Designation
Dwelling
Units
Population Non-Residential Square
Footage
NonResidential
Acreage
Employees
Very Low Density
Residential
153 512 N/A - N/A
Low Density
Residential
5,887 19,662 N/A - N/A
Medium Density
Residential
3,391 11,326 N/A - N/A
High Density
Residential
6,823 22,790 N/A - N/A
Very High Density
Residential
495 1,654 N/A - N/A
Mixed Use 10,992 36,712 3,627,224 83 4,836
Commercial 0 0 6,773,461 156 7,125
Downtown Village 181 603 393,341 9 571
Industrial 0 0 2,434,024 56 1,623
Public/Institutional 0 0 1,643,216 38 2,741
Open Space 12 41 24,941 <1 12
Park 0 0 3,821 <1 64
Total 30,604 102,217 24,014,734 551 25,669
Source: De Novo Planning Group, 2021

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3608 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ra
monaExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Esplanade
A
ve
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
A
v
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
Columbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
Stanford St
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
AcaciaAve
UV74
UV74
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure1.VicinityMap
Legend
CityofSanJacinto
NeighboringCity
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityPark
Waterbodies
HEMET

BEAUMONT
P

00.51 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3609 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure2
CurrentLandUse
Legend
2006GeneralPlanLandUse
ER:EstateResidential
RR:RuralResidential
LDR:LowDensityResidential
MDR:MediumDensityResidential
MHDR:MediumHighDensityResidential
VHDR:VeryHighDensityResidential
CC:Commercial
DC:DowntownCommercial
BP:BusinessPark
I:Industrial
OS:OpenSpace
OS-R:OpenSpaceRecreation
P:Park
PI:Public/Institutional
River
Gateway
SpecificPlanArea
ROW
NeighboringCity
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityofSanJacinto
HEMET

BEAUMONT
P

00.51 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3610 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO

GENERALPLANUPDATE
Figure3
ProposedGeneralPlan
LandUseMap
HEMET

BEAUMONT
0 P½
1 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
LegendC
ityofSanJacinto
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
NeighboringCity
LandUseDesignation
VLDR:VeryLowDensityResidential
LDR:LowDensityResidential
MDR:MediumDensityResidential
HDR:HighDensityResidential
VHDR:VeryHighDensityResidential
MU:MixedUse
C:Commercial
DV:DowntownVillage
BP:BusinessPark
I:Industrial
PI:Public/Institutional
OS:OpenSpace
P:Park
SPA:SpecificPlanArea
Water
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.Mapdate:January11,2021.

TRAILSSP
SP01-03

VILLAGESSP
SP01-04
COVESP
SP01-01

ESPLANADESP
SP01-02
SOBOBA

SPRINGSSP
SP01-85
RANCHO

SANJACINTOSP
SP01-00

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3611 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Introduction October 7, 2021 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ANALYSIS SCENARIOS AND LOCATIONS
As part of the assessment, the following scenarios were developed and analyzed:
• Existing (2019) Conditions – Study intersections and roadway segments were analyzed using existing traffic counts collected in July 2019.
• Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan Conditions – This scenario represents the land uses, densities, and circulation network changes for the full buildout of the General Plan in the year 2040 and consists of forecast volumes using the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) regional travel demand model. This scenario also includes roadway improvements that are expected to be implemented by 2040. The roadway improvements expected to be implemented were identified collaboratively with City staff and are documented in Assumed Future Roadway Improvements starting on page 39.

Analysis intersections and roadway segments were identified collaboratively with City staff and represent key locations throughout the city that could be affected by implementation of the updated General Plan.

The study intersections and roadway segments are presented in Existing Conditions starting on page 15.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3612 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Regulatory Setting

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3613 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Regulatory Setting October 7, 2021 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

REGULATORY SETTING
The regulatory framework includes federal, state, regional and local plans pertinent to the City of San Jacinto and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process for transportation and circulation.

FEDERAL REGULATIONS

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) provides comprehensive rights and protections to individuals with disabilities. The goal of the ADA is to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency. To implement this goal, the United States Access Board has created accessibility guidelines for public rights-of-way. The guidelines address various issues, including roadway design practices, slope and terrain issues, pedestrian access to streets, sidewalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking, and other components of public rights-of-way.

The City of San Jacinto is committed to ensure that people with disabilities have access to City programs, services, activities, and facilities. In all of its services, programs, events, activities, facilities, and public meetings, the City strives to eliminate any barriers that prohibit people with disabilities from full access to facilities.

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a federal agency that focuses on national highway programs. FHWA administers and manages federal highway programs and establishes national standards.

The FHWA publishes the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) which specifies the standards for street markings, traffic signals, and street signs in the United States. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) developed the 2014 California MUTCD (Rev 6) based on the FHWA MUTCD.

STATE REGULATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is the primary state agency responsible for transportation issues. One of its duties is the construction and maintenance of the state highway system.

Caltrans has established standards for roadway traffic flow and developed procedures to determine if State-controlled facilities require improvements. For projects that may physically affect facilities or require access to a state highway, Caltrans requires encroachment permits before such activity may be undertaken. For projects that would not physically affect facilities but may influence traffic flow and levels of services at such facilities, Caltrans may recommend measures to mitigate the traffic impacts of such projects.

Additionally, the following Caltrans procedures and directives are relevant to transportation improvements in San Jacinto:
• Caltrans recently updated its transportation analysis guidelines to reflect a statewide shift from level of service (LOS) to vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Caltrans has provided guidance in three recent publications: Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (May 2020), Transportation Analysis Under CEQA: Evaluating Transportation Impacts of State Highway System Projects (September 2020), and Transportation Analysis Framework: Evaluating Transportation Impacts of State Highway System Projects (September 2020).

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3614 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Regulatory Setting October 7, 2021 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
• Traffic Safety Bulletin 20-02-R1 (Interim Local Development Intergovernmental Review Safety Review Practitioners Guide) provide instructions to Caltrans staff, lead agencies, developers, and consultants conducting safety reviews for proposed land use projects and plan affecting the state highway system. This guidance establishes the safety impact review expectations for Caltrans and lead agencies to comply with CEQA. This guidance is part of the shift away from using LOS or other similar metrics to assess transportation impacts.
• The Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual outlines pertinent statutory requirements, planning policies, and implementing procedures regarding transportation facilities. It is continually and incrementally updated to reflect changes in policy and procedures. For example, the most recent revision incorporates the Complete Streets policy from Deputy Directive 64-R1, which is detailed below.
o Caltrans Deputy Directive 64 (2001) requires Caltrans to consider the needs of non-motorized travelers, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and persons with disabilities, in all programming, planning, maintenance, construction, operations, and project development activities and products. This includes incorporation of the best available standards in all of the Department’s practices.
o Caltrans Deputy Directive 64-R1 (2014) requires Caltrans to provide for the needs of travelers of all ages and abilities in all planning, programming, design, construction, operations, and maintenance activities and products on the state highway system. Caltrans supports bicycle, pedestrian, and transit travel with a focus on “complete streets” that begins early in system planning and continues through project construction and maintenance and operations.
• Caltrans Director’s Policy 22 (2001) establishes support for balancing transportation needs with community goals. Caltrans seeks to involve and integrate community goals in the planning, design, construction, and maintenance and operations processes, including accommodating the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians.
• Caltrans, as a responsible agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), is available for early consultation on a project to provide guidance on applicable transportation analysis methodologies or other transportation related issues and is responsible for reviewing the traffic impact study for errors and omissions pertaining to the state highway facilities.

OPR GENERAL PLAN GUIDELINES
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) publishes General Plan Guidelines as a “how to” for cities and counties developing their general plans. OPR released its updated guidelines in 2017, which includes legislative changes, new guidance, policy recommendations, external links to resource documents, and additional resources. For each general plan element, the guidelines discuss statutory requirements in detail, provide recommended policy language, and include examples of city and county general plans that have adopted similar policies.

ASSEMBLY BILL 32, SENATE BILL 32, AND SENATE BILL 375
Assembly Bill (AB) 32, also known as the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, committed California to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The California Air Resources Board (ARB), which is coordinating the response to comply with AB 32, is currently on schedule to meet this deadline. In 2016, Senate Bill (SB) 32 added a new target: reducing statewide emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

SB 375 provides guidance for curbing emissions from cars and light trucks to help California comply with AB

32. There are five major components to SB 375:
• ARB will guide the adoption of GHG emission targets to be met by each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the state.
• MPOs are required to create a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) that provides a plan for meeting these regional targets. The SCS must be consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3615 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Regulatory Setting October 7, 2021 Page 11
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
• Regional housing elements and transportation plans must be synchronized on eight-year schedules.

Also, the SCS and Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) must be consistent with each other. • CEQA is streamlined for preferred development types such as mixed-use projects and transitoriented developments (TODs) if they meet specific requirements. • MPOs must use transportation and air emission modeling methodologies consistent with California Transportation Commission (CTC) guidelines.

CALIFORNIA COMPLETE STREETS ACT OF 2008 (AB 1358)
Originally passed in 2008, California’s Complete Streets Act took effect in 2011 and requires local jurisdictions to plan for land use transportation policies that reflect a “complete streets” approach to mobility. “Complete streets” comprises a suite of policies and street design guidelines which provide for the needs of all road users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit operators and riders, children, the elderly, and the disabled. From 2011 onward, any local jurisdiction—county or city—that undertakes a substantive update of the circulation element of its general plan must consider “complete streets” and incorporate corresponding policies and programs. In 2010, OPR released guidelines for compliance with this legislation which provide direction on how circulation elements can best plan for a variety of travel modes such as transit, walking, bicycling, and freight.

SENATE BILL 743
On September 27, 2013, Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed into law. Previously, CEQA transportation analyses of individual projects were focused on the determination of impacts in the circulation system in terms of roadway capacity at specific locations, mostly located in proximity to a project site. SB 743 has fundamentally changed transportation impact analysis as part of CEQA compliance. These changes include the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant. Further, parking impacts are not considered significant impacts on the environment for select development projects within infill areas with nearby frequent transit service.

SB 743 was passed to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” OPR published the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) to provide recommendations for jurisdictions to apply VMT metrics and thresholds compliant with SB 743.

OPR’s advisory includes recommendations pertaining to screening criteria, metrics, and significant impact thresholds. OPR’s recommendations are not binding and lead agencies ultimately have the discretion to set or apply their own significance thresholds, provided they are based on significant evidence.

For land use and transportation projects, SB 743-compliant CEQA analysis became mandatory on July 1, 2020. The City of San Jacinto has prepared guidelines for transportation impact analyses consistent with SB 743.

ASSEMBLY BILL 417
In October 2013, AB 417 created a statutory CEQA exemption for bicycle plans in urbanized areas. Before the passage of this bill, cities and counties that prepared bicycle plans were required to carry out a CEQA review. AB 417 exempts the following types of bicycle projects in an urbanized area:
• Restriping of streets and highways
• Bicycle parking and storage
• Signal timing to improve intersection operations
• Signage for bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles
However, not all bicycle plans are exempt if certain conditions are met (e.g., a new Class I bicycle trail through a sensitive natural area).

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3616 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Regulatory Setting October 7, 2021 Page 12
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

REGIONAL REGULATIONS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is a federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and is made up of six counties and 191 cities. SCAG develops long-range regional transportation plans including sustainable communities strategies and growth forecast components, regional transportation improvement programs, regional housing needs allocations, and a portion of the South Coast Air Quality Management Plans.

SCAG adopted its most recent Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), Connect SoCal, in September 2020. Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that provides a vision for the region’s future and includes over 4,000 transportation projects. The plan is supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve state greenhouse gas emission reduction goals.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The Riverside County Planning Department’s General Plan was adopted in 1998. The County of Riverside Highway Plan designates the arterial system in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Defined according to specific arterial functional classifications, the Highway Plan serves to define the intended future roadway system in the County and includes San Jacinto as part of Circulation Study Area 3.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC)
The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) coordinates transportation planning efforts throughout Riverside County and programs funding for project implementation. Additionally, it prepares the Congestion Management Program (CMP), a plan mandated by California law to describe the strategies to address congestion problems on the CMP network, which includes State highways and principal arterials. The goals of the CMP are to reduce traffic congestion and to provide a mechanism for coordinating land use development and transportation improvement decisions. The CMP Guidelines require analysis of the CMP network and uses level of service standards as a means to measure congestion and to determine how local governments meet CMP standards.

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION

UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (WRCOG TUMF)
Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) developed and administers the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), a program that ensures that new development pays its fair share for the increased traffic that it creates. WRCOG is designated as the program administrator for the TUMF Program.

As administrator, WRCOG receives all fees generated from the TUMF as collected by the local jurisdictions.

WRCOG invests, accounts for, and expends the fee in accordance with the TUMF ordinance, the administrative plan, and applicable state laws. WRCOG maintains a map of the TUMF network, which will inform this study’s assumptions about what will be built in 2040.

LOCAL REGULATIONS
With the exception of State highways that are under Caltrans’ jurisdiction, streets in San Jacinto are generally under the jurisdiction of the City of San Jacinto.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3617 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Regulatory Setting October 7, 2021 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN
The current San Jacinto General Plan, adopted in 2006 and amended in 2012, is the primary planning document for the City and serves to guide development in the City. The San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element provides the policy framework for the regulation and development of transportation systems, balancing demands for moving people and goods within the City. It addresses vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck, equestrian, and rail transportation. Parking, transportation system and demand management, and infrastructure funding policies are also included. Table 2 includes current General Plan goals related to transportation and traffic.

Table 2: San Jacinto General Plan Goals Relevant to Transportation and Traffic

NUMBER GOAL
Goal 1 Provide a circulation system that meets the needs of existing and future land uses.

Goal 2 Achieve a circulation system that is integrated with the larger regional transportation system to ensure the economic well-being of the community.

Goal 3 Work to ensure that the alignment of SR 79 benefits the community.

Goal 4 Promote the increased use of public and multimodal transportation and provide adequate facilities for these modes of transportation.

Goal 5 Provide an extensive and regionally linked public bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails system.

Goal 6 Create transportation management strategies to comply with the County Congestion Management Plan.

Source: San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element 2006.

SAN JACINTO TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The San Jacinto Trails Master Plan (TMP) summarizes the City’s existing trail and multi-modal conditions to develop recommendations that make multi-modal transportation safe and enjoyable options. The TMP establishes a system of corridors by incorporating walking, biking, and multi-use paths (trails) within San Jacinto’s streets and open space. The TMP also provides recommendations on how to implement and maintain the proposed corridor improvements.

The TMP has not been adopted but the goals, policies, and infrastructure recommendations from the TMP will be reflected in the General Plan Update.

SAN JACINTO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
In 2020, the City adopted updated Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (“Analysis Guidelines”). The Analysis Guidelines describe the triggers for transportation impact analysis within the City and analysis specifications. The Analysis Guidelines also update the City’s analysis procedure consistent with SB 743. The analysis in this traffic study is conducted consistent with the Analysis Guidelines, where applicable.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3618 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Existing Conditions

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3619 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 15

EXISTING CONDITIONS

EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK
The roadway system in San Jacinto consists of multiple facility types that serve local and regional traffic demand. The vehicular facilities in San Jacinto are discussed below.

STATE ROUTE 79
Portions of the City’s local roadway network include State Route 79 (SR 79), which was formerly a Caltrans owned and operated facility but has been relinquished to the City. Although the City owns and operates the roadway, it serves regional connections through the City – to SR 79 to the north and to State Route 74 to the south Local portions of the route include (listed from north to south):
• Ramona Expressway between Sanderson and State
• State Street between Ramona Expressway and Ramona Boulevard • Ramona Boulevard between State Street and San Jacinto Avenue • San Jacinto Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard

LOCAL ROADWAYS
Roadways within the City are classified in the 2006 San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element as limited access conventional highway, urban arterial, arterial, major, secondary and collector. • Limited Access Conventional Highway (LACH). According to the current Circulation Element, limited access conventional highways generally have six to eight lanes and a raised median with a daily capacity of approximately 81,700 vehicles.
• Urban Arterial. Urban arterials generally have six lanes and a raised median with a daily capacity of approximately 71,800 vehicles. Turn lanes may be provided at key intersections. • Arterial. Arterials generally have four lanes and a raised median with a daily capacity of approximately 35,900 vehicles. Turn lanes may be provided at key intersections. • Major. Major roadways generally have four lanes and a striped median with a daily capacity of approximately 34,100 vehicles. Turn lanes may be provided at key intersections. • Secondary. Secondary roadways generally have four lanes and no median with a daily capacity of approximately 25,900 vehicles. Turn lanes may be provided at intersections as needed. • Collector. Collector streets generally have two lanes and no median with a daily capacity of approximately 13,000 vehicles. Turn lanes may be provided at intersections as needed.

On-street parking is typically prohibited on LACH roadways within the City but may be present on other facility types.

Significant roadways in San Jacinto and their current classifications as presented in the San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element are described below. Not all these roadways are currently built according to the designations in the San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element. 7 th Street travels in the east-west direction and is designated as a secondary roadway. The roadway generally consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median. Sidewalks are generally not provided along undeveloped portions and provided along at least one side of the roadway along newer residential and commercial developments. The posted speed limit ranges from 30 mph to 45 mph.

On-street parking is generally not provided on 7th Street.

Cawston Avenue travels in the north-south direction and is designated as a secondary roadway. The roadway generally consists of four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with no median from Cottonwood Avenue to 7th Street and two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median from 7th

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3620 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 16
Street to Esplanade Avenue. Sidewalks are generally provided from Cottonwood Avenue to 7th Street and not provided between 7th Street and Esplanade Avenue. The posted speed limit ranges from 30 mph to 45 mph. On-street parking is generally not provided on Cawston Avenue.

Cottonwood Avenue travels in the east-west direction and is designated as an arterial roadway. The roadway consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median west of Center Grove Way, three travel lanes (two lanes in the eastbound direction and one lane in the westbound direction) with a raised center median from Center Grove Way to Sanderson Avenue, three travel lanes (one lane in the eastbound direction and two lanes in the westbound direction) with either a painted or raised center median from Sanderson Avenue to Lyon Avenue, two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no center median east of Lyon Avenue. Sidewalks are generally not provided along undeveloped portions and provided along at least one side of the roadway along newer residential developments. The posted speed limit ranges from 45 mph to 50 mph. On-street parking is generally not provided on Cottonwood Avenue.

Esplanade Avenue in the east-west direction and is designated as a major roadway. The roadway generally consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median west of Palm Avenue, four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with a painted median from Palm Avenue to Arroyo Viejo Drive, and four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with no center median east of Arroyo Viejo Drive.

Sidewalks are generally not provided along undeveloped portions and provided along at least one side of the roadway along newer residential and commercial developments. The posted speed limit ranges from 40 mph to 45 mph. On-street parking is generally not provided on Esplanade Avenue.

Hewitt Street travels in the north-south direction and is designated as a secondary roadway. The roadway generally consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median north of Evans Street and four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with a painted center median between Evans Street and Esplanade Avenue. Sidewalks are generally not provided along undeveloped portions and provided along at least one side of the roadway along newer residential developments. The posted speed limit is 40 mph.

On-street parking is generally provided on Hewitt Street.

Lyon Avenue travels in the north-south direction and is designated as a major roadway. The roadway generally consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median. Sidewalks are generally not provided along undeveloped portions and provided along at least one side of the roadway along newer residential and commercial developments. The posted speed limit ranges from 40 mph to 50 mph.

On-street parking is generally not provided on Lyon Avenue except along residential developments.

Ramona Expressway travels in the east-west direction from west of Sanderson Avenue before it transitions to the northwest/southeast direction east of Sanderson Avenue. It is designated as a LACH west of San Jacinto Avenue and an Urban Arterial east of San Jacinto Avenue. The roadway consists of four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with a striped center median west of Sanderson Avenue and between State Street and Main Street, six travel lanes with a raised center median between Sanderson Avenue and State Street, four travel lanes with a raised center median Main Street and 7th Street, and two travel lanes with a painted center median south of 7th Street. Sidewalks are generally not provided on both sides of the roadway except for between Chase Street and San Jacinto Avenue, where a sidewalk is provided on at least one side of the roadway. A Class I bicycle path is provided along Ramona Expressway between San Jacinto Avenue and Main Street. The posted speed limit along the roadway ranges from between 55 miles per hour (mph) to 65 mph. On-street parking is generally not allowed on Ramona Expressway. Ramona Expressway between State Street and Sanderson Avenue is part of SR 79, which has been relinquished from Caltrans but still serves as part of the route.

Ramona Boulevard travels in the northwest-southeast direction and is designated as a secondary roadway.

The roadway consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with a painted median from Sanderson Avenue to Lyon Avenue and two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no median from Lyon Avenue to State Street, and two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with a raised median from State Street to San Jacinto Avenue. Sidewalks are generally provided on at least one side of the roadway

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3621 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 17
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 17
in developed areas. The posted speed limit ranges from 25 mph to 35 mph. On-street parking is generally not provided on Ramona Boulevard. Ramona Boulevard between State Street and San Jacinto Avenue is part of SR 79, which has been relinquished from Caltrans but still serves as part of the route.

San Jacinto Avenue travels in the north-south direction and is designated as a secondary roadway north of Main Street and a major roadway south of Main Street. The roadway consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) from Ramona Expressway to 7th Street with no center median, four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with no center median from 7th Street to Esplanade Avenue and five travel lanes (two lanes southbound and three lanes northbound) with a raised median south of Esplanade Avenue.

Sidewalks are generally provided on at least one side of the roadway. The posted speed limit on the roadway ranges from 25 mph to 40 mph. On-street parking is provided in some areas on San Jacinto Avenue that have residential or commercial developments fronting the roadway. San Jacinto Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard is part of SR 79, which has been relinquished from Caltrans but still serves as part of the route.

Sanderson Avenue travels in the north-south direction and is designated as an urban arterial. The roadway consists of four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with a painted center median. Sidewalks are generally not provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. On-street parking is not provided on Sanderson Avenue.

State Street travels in the north-south direction and is designated as a major roadway. The roadway consists of four travel lanes (two lanes in each direction) with a painted center median. Sidewalks are generally provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. On-street parking is generally not provided on State Street. State Street between Ramona Expressway and Ramona Boulevard is part of SR 79, which has been relinquished from Caltrans but still serves as part of the route.

Warren Road travels in the north-south direction and is designated as an arterial. The roadway consists of two travel lanes (one lane in each direction) with no center median. Sidewalks are generally not provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. On-street parking is generally not provided on Warren Road.

BICYCLE FACILITIES
The City of San Jacinto has a bicycle facilities network that consists of both dedicated and shared street space for bicyclists. Figure 4 displays the existing bicycle facilities in the City. Bicycle facilities are categorized into four types, as described and depicted in illustrations below. Note that while the graphics include typical widths for the various facilities, the exact configuration of a bike facility can vary depending on its location and the jurisdiction’s preferences.
• Class I Bikeway (Bike Path). Also known as a shared path or multi-use path, a bike path is a paved right-of-way for bicycle travel that is completely separate from any street or highway.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3622 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 18
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 18
• Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane). A striped and stenciled lane for one-way bicycle travel on a street or highway. This facility could include a buffered space between the bike lane and vehicle lane and the bike lane could be adjacent to on-street parking.
• Class III Bikeway (Bike Route). A signed route along a street where the bicyclist shares the right-ofway with motor vehicles. This facility can also be designated using a shared lane marking (sharrow).

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3623 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 19
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 19
• Class IV Bikeway (Separated Bike Lane). A bikeway for the exclusive use of bicycles including a separation required between the separated bikeway and the through vehicular traffic. The separation may include, but is not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, or on-street parking.

As shown in Figure 4, existing bicycle facilities in San Jacinto include:
• Class I facility running along Ramona Expressway between San Jacinto Avenue and Main Street and along Young Street between Ramona Boulevard and De Anza Drive. • Class II bicycle lanes on Ramona Expressway between Sanderson Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue and on Ramona Boulevard between State Street and Wateka Street. • Class II buffered bicycle lanes on De Anza Drive between Young Street and State Street. • Class III bicycle routes on 7th Street between San Jacinto Avenue and Rosario Avenue and on Santa Fe Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Main Street.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3624 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
Columbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure4.

ExistingBicycleFacilities
ExistingBikeways
Class1:Multi-UsePath
Class2:BikeLane
Class2B:BufferedBikeLane
Class3:BikeRoute
NeighboringCity
Waterbodies
CityPark
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityofSanJacinto
HEMET

BEAUMONT
P

00.51 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3625 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 21
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 21

TRANSIT SERVICE
The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) provides bus service within San Jacinto and throughout Riverside County.

In addition, transit riders can access Metrolink commuter rail services from the nearby Perris Downtown and Perris South stations. The public transit services in and around San Jacinto are documented below.

RTA
RTA provides bus service in Riverside County. It connects San Jacinto with several nearby cities (including Moreno Valley, Hemet, Menifee, and Perris) and several regional destinations such as the two Metrolink stations in Perris.

Declining ridership due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused changes in some routes at the time this report was written. As of May 2021, Routes 32, 33, and 217, which served San Jacinto in the past, were suspended.

Service overhauls are also planned in San Jacinto for Summer and Fall 2021. In particular, Routes 31 and 74 will discontinue service from Mt. San Jacinto College and Hemet Valley Mall; however, service may be reinstated as funding and ridership allow.

Therefore, pre-COVID bus routes in San Jacinto (from the Existing Conditions period for this study) are illustrated in Figure 5. Table 3 presents the route information and average weekday daily ridership for all RTA routes that serve San Jacinto in Fiscal Year 2016 (the latest data available from RTA).

Table 3: Riverside Transit Agency Lines and Ridership
# SAN JACINTO

STREETS SERVED

DESTINATIONS SERVED HOURS OF

OPERATION

AVERAGE

WEEKDAY
DAILY

RIDERSHIP
(ROUTE)

HEADWAYS (MINUTES)
PEAK OFFPEAK
31 State Street Moreno Valley Mall, Moreno
Valley Senior Center, Riverside
University Medical Center, Sun
Lakes at Village, Beaumont
Walmart, Mt. San Jacinto
College, San Jacinto High
School, State & Fruitvale, State
& Acacia Post Office, Hemet
Valley Mall
4:34 AM -
10:35 PM
406 65 70
32 State Street, De
Anza Drive,
Main Street,
Mistletoe
Avenue,
Esplanade
Avenue, San
Jacinto
Avenue,
Idyllwild Drive,
7 th Street,
Villines Avenue,
Commonwealth
Avenue, Hewitt
Street
Mt. San Jacinto College,
Idyllwild Drive &
Attenborough, Main &
Mistletoe, Las Rosas & 7th,
Esplanade & San Jacinto,
State & Menlo, San Jacinto &
Mayberry, State & Stetson,
Hemet Valley Mall
5:50 AM -
8:32 PM
297 60 70

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3626 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 22
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 22
# SAN JACINTO

STREETS SERVED

DESTINATIONS SERVED HOURS OF

OPERATION

AVERAGE

WEEKDAY
DAILY

RIDERSHIP
(ROUTE)

HEADWAYS (MINUTES)
PEAK OFFPEAK
42 Lake Park Drive,
Main Street,
Mistletoe
Avenue, 7th
Street, Santa Fe
Avenue, Menlo
Avenue, San
Jacinto
Avenue,
Esplanade,
Avenue, State
Street,
Cottonwood
Avenue, Kirby
Street
Soboba Casino, San Jacinto
Community Center, San
Jacinto & Esplanade, Palm &
Cottonwood, Hemet Valley
Mall
6:55 AM -
7:04 PM
126 67 77
74 State Street,
Ramona
Boulevard, San
Jacinto Avenue
Mt. San Jacinto College,
Hemet Valley Mall, Simpson &
Winchester, Mt. San Jacinto
College Menifee, Cherry Hills &
Bradley, South Perris Metrolink
Station, Perris Station Transit
Center
3:39 AM -
11:30 PM
503 48 60
217 State Street Mt. San Jacinto College,
Hemet Valley Mall,
Promenade Mall, Equity &
Ynez, Escondido Transit Center
3:44 AM -
8:29 PM
124 20 N/A
Source: RTA System Map (May 12, 2019), RTA Short Range Transit Plan (May 2019)

METROLINK
Metrolink provides heavy-rail, regional transit service to the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, Ventura, San Diego, and Riverside. The closest Metrolink stations to San Jacinto are the Perris Downtown and Perris South stations approximately 17 miles west of San Jacinto. The 91/Perris Valley line serves the stations in Perris and connects to Los Angeles Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles. An average of 2,467 passengers per day utilize the 91/Perris Valley line, per most recent available ridership data.
1 The 91/Perris Valley line provides service to the two Perris stations between 4:43 AM to 8:25 PM on weekdays only, with approximately 36-minute headways during commute periods. Trains also run twice a day on weekends.
1 Southern California Regional Rail Authority Development of Strategic Plan, 2016.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3627 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure5
ExistingTransitRoutes
Legend
RiversideTransitAgencyRoutes
CityofSanJacinto
NeighboringCity
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityPark
Waterbodies
HEMET

BEAUMONT
P

00.51 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3628 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 24
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 24

PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
San Jacinto offers several types of facilities and amenities that support walking in the City. The availability and quality of pedestrian facilities vary throughout the City and were analyzed using seven key factors as shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Pedestrian Facility Conditions in San Jacinto

FACTOR DESCRIPTION SAN JACINTO ASSESSMENT
Sidewalk availability is core to supporting
walkability and safety separating
pedestrians from vehicles and other
modes. In addition, it is important that
sidewalks are present on both sides of the
roadway and are available along the
entire segment rather than end
midblock.

Sidewalks are generally not provided
on both sides of arterial and local
streets in between intersections where
the land is undeveloped across the
City. Sidewalks are generally
provided along newer residential or
commercial developments where
pedestrian activity is likely to occur.

Cracked, broken, or otherwise damaged
sidewalks can pose a safety hazard and
discourage walking.

Where sidewalks are provided, they
are generally in good condition, free
of cracks or uplifts.

Marked crosswalks can safely
accommodate pedestrians that need to
cross streets. A lack of marked crosswalks
could hinder walkability since
pedestrians need to travel greater
distances to reach a safe marked
crossing point. Drivers may also be less
likely to yield to intersections at unmarked
crossings.

Marked crosswalks on at least two
sides are generally provided at
signalized intersections across the
City. Marked crosswalks are generally
not provided at unsignalized
intersections (both all-way stop
controlled and two-way stopcontrolled intersections).

Shading, whether natural or artificial, can
encourage walking in areas such as
Southern California which are relatively
warm with limited rainfall, especially in
the summer.

Shading is provided sporadically
across the City in the form of tree
landscaping along arterials and local
residential streets which contain
newer residential or commercial
development.

Steep hills and ravines can discourage
walking, especially for pedestrians with
limited mobility.

The City is generally flat without steep
grade changes at the pedestrian
level.

Buffers which provide separation
between pedestrians and moving
vehicles can help improve the walking
experience, and can include
landscaping, parked vehicles, and
bulbouts, which serve to both reduce
pedestrian crossing distances at
intersections and as a traffic calming
measure.

Parking is generally prohibited along
arterial roads and street landscaping
buffers are generally not provided.

Landscape buffers are sporadically
provided closer to newer residential
or commercial development.

In addition to physical facilities that
accommodate walking, useful or
interesting amenities along sidewalks
create a more interesting walking
environment and increase pedestrian
comfort. Amenities can include sidewalkadjacent retail and restaurants, landscaping, and street furniture.

Street landscaping is generally
provided along residential
neighborhoods. Arterial roadways
offer few pedestrian-level amenities.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3629 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 25
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 25
In addition to on-street facilities, unpaved trails (soft-surface) used by San Jacinto residents and visitors include trails in the western portion of the City within the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) conserved lands and along the San Jacinto River. Additionally, the City completed an ADA Transition Plan that evaluated access and sidewalks throughout the City.

FREIGHT AND GOODS MOVEMENT
The Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) of 1982 defines a network of state facilities as truck routes which accommodate large trucks.

According to the current San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element, trucks should be oriented to the Ramona Expressway and SR 79 arterials. The San Jacinto Municipal Code prohibits vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight of 14,000 pounds on roadways not designated as a commercial vehicle route. The following roadways are designated as commercial vehicle routes and are also displayed in Figure 6. 2 • Ramona Expressway from the western City limits to the eastern City limits • Sanderson Avenue from Ramona Expressway to the southern City limits • State Street from Ramona Expressway to the southern City limits • Esplanade Avenue from the western City limits to San Jacinto Avenue • Seventh Street from State Street to San Jacinto Avenue • Lake Park Drive from Ramona Expressway to Soboba Road from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM • Soboba Road within the City limits from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM 2 City of San Jacinto Municipal Code, 10.08.040

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3630 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure6
ExistingTruckRoutes
Legend
TruckRoutes
CityofSanJacinto
NeighboringCity
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityPark
Waterbodies
HEMET

BEAUMONT
P

00.51 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3631 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 27
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 27

EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENTS
24-hour vehicle volumes were collected at 19 key roadway segments in May 2019. Table 5 provides the study roadway segments, functional classifications, and existing daily volumes. The existing daily volumes are also shown in Figure 7.

Table 5: Existing (2019) Roadway Segment Volumes
ROADWAY SEGMENT ROADWAY TYPE1 ADT2
Ramona Expressway West of Warren Road Major 22,629
West of Sanderson Avenue Major 24,155
East of Lyon Avenue LACH 27,017
East of State Street LACH 23,861
South of Esplanade Avenue Collector 18,706
Warren Road South of Ramona Expressway Collector 11,778 South of Esplanade Avenue Collector 13,891
Sanderson Avenue North of Ramona Expressway Major 49,645 South of Ramona Boulevard Major 23,515
South of Esplanade Avenue Major 26,071
Lyon Avenue South of Esplanade Avenue Collector 7,418
State Street North of College Entrance Collector 14,094 South of Ramona Expressway Major 24,139
South of Esplanade Avenue Major 19,520
Cottonwood Avenue West of State Street Collector 7,317
7 th Street West of State Street Collector 10,039
San Jacinto Avenue South of Esplanade Avenue Arterial 21,546 Esplanade Avenue West of Ramona Expressway Secondary 10,045 Lake Park Drive East of Ramona Expressway Collector 12,250 Notes:

1. Roadway type refers to roadway designations from the San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element

2. ADT denotes Average Daily Traffic

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3632 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
Columbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79

CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure7.

ExistingRoadwayVolumes
Legend
NeighboringCity
Waterbodies
CityPark
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityofSanJacinto
HEMET

BEAUMONT
0 P0.5
1 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

HEMET
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
22,629
24,155
27,017
23,861
18,706
11,778 13,891
49,645
23,515 26,071
7,418
14,094 24,139 19,520
7,317
10,039
21,546
10,045
12,250

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3633 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 29
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 29

SEGMENT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Operations at the 19 key roadway segments in the City were determined on a daily traffic volume basis.

Operations were assessed and assigned a level of service (LOS) letter grade ranging from LOS A to LOS F (from better to worse congestion), with LOS A signifying free-flow traffic and LOS F signifying operations that are over roadway capacity.

The operations analysis is based on capacity analysis according to their closest matching roadway crosssection, using roadway classifications and capacities adapted from National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 825: Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual (consistent with the City’s transportation analysis guidelines). This typically matches the roadway’s existing functional classification designation, but where it does not, a note is provided in the table.3 The functional classification definitions have been updated as part of this General Plan update; thus, updated capacity values and LOS scores are shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Updated Roadway Segment LOS Thresholds
Roadway Type Lane
Configuration Capacity A B C D E
LACH 8 lane divided 70,000 42,000 49,000 56,000 63,000 70,000 LACH 6 lane divided 59,000 35,400 41,300 47,200 53,100 59,000 Primary Arterial 6 lane divided 55,300 33,180 38,710 44,240 49,770 55,300 Primary Arterial 4 lane divided 39,300 23,580 27,510 31,440 35,370 39,300 Arterial 4 lane divided 35,800 21,480 25,060 28,640 32,220 35,800 Arterial 4 lane undivided 32,600 19,560 22,820 26,080 29,340 32,600 Collector 2 lane divided 18,300 10,980 12,810 14,640 16,470 18,300 Collector 2 lane undivided 17,800 10,680 12,460 14,240 16,020 17,800 Source: Kittelson, 2021. Adapted from NCHRP Report 825.

The roadway segment analysis results are shown in Table 7. 3 Not all roadways are built out to match their identified roadway classification. Therefore, this analysis matches the existing roadway to the closest relevant capacity value based on lane number and roadway characteristics rather than a proposed future build-out associated with its roadway classification designation.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3634 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 30
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 30
Table 7: Roadway Level of Service
Roadway Segment
Existing 2019
Roadway Type1 ADT V/C LOS
Ramona Expressway
West of Warren Road Collector, 2U2 22,629 1.27 F
West of Sanderson Avenue Primary Arterial, 4D 24,155 0.61 B East of Lyon Avenue LACH, 6D 27,017 0.46 A
East of State Street and Eagle Road Primary Arterial, 4D3 23,861 0.61 B South of Esplanade Avenue Collector, 2U 18,706 1.05 F
Warren Road
South of Ramona Expressway Collector, 2U 11,778 0.66 B
South of Esplanade Avenue Collector, 2U 13,891 0.78 C
Sanderson Avenue
North of Ramona Expressway Primary Arterial, 4D 49,645 1.26 F South of Ramona Boulevard Primary Arterial, 4D 23,515 0.60 A South of Esplanade Avenue Primary Arterial, 4D 26,071 0.66 B Lyon Avenue South of Esplanade Avenue Collector, 2U 7,418 0.42 A State Street
North of College Entrance Arterial, 4D 14,094 0.39 A
South of Ramona Expressway Primary Arterial, 4D 24,139 0.61 B South of Esplanade Avenue Primary Arterial, 4D 19,520 0.50 A Cottonwood Avenue West of State Street Collector, 2D 7,317 0.40 A 7th Street West of State Street Collector, 2D 10,039 0.55 A San Jacinto Avenue South of Esplanade Avenue Primary Arterial, 4D 21,546 0.55 A Esplanade Avenue West of Ramona Expressway Arterial, 4U 10,045 0.31 A Lake Park Drive East of Ramona Expressway Arterial, 4D4 12,250 0.34 A Notes:

BOLD – Represents roadway segments operating at LOS E or F. ADT = Average Daily Traffic

1. “Roadway Type” denotes lane number and roadway configuration: 2U= 2-lane undivided, 4D= 4-lane divided, etc.

2. Existing classification is Major roadway but roadway type shown most closely matches existing cross-section and is used to evaluate operational capacity.

3. Existing classification is Limited-Access California Highway, but roadway type shown most closely matches existing cross-section and is used to evaluate operational capacity.

4. Existing classification is Collector, but roadway type shown most closely matches existing cross-section and is used to evaluate operational capacity.

The following locations are shown to operate over capacity:
• Ramona Expressway, west of Warren Road
• Ramona Expressway, south of Esplanade Avenue
• Sanderson Avenue, north of Ramona Expressway

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3635 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 31
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 31

STUDY INTERSECTIONS
Weekday AM and PM peak hour operations were assessed at 35 key intersections in and around the City, show in Figure 8. Vehicle turning movement data was collected in May 2019 when schools were in session during the weekday morning (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and evening (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods. The existing turning movement traffic counts are shown in Figure 9. The study locations and traffic control devices are stated in Table 8.

Table 8: Study Intersections

INTERSECTION NUMBER INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL
1 Warren Road & Ramona Expressway Signal
2 Warren Road & Cottonwood Avenue Signal
3 Warren Road & Esplanade Avenue AWSC
4 Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Expressway [a] Signal
5 Sanderson Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue Signal
6 Sanderson Avenue & 7th Street Signal
7 Sanderson Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal
8 Lyon Avenue & Ramona Expressway [a] Signal
9 Lyon Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue AWSC
10 Lyon Avenue & 7th Street AWSC
11 Lyon Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal
12 State Street & Sagecrest Drive/College Entrance Signal 13 State Street & Community College Drive TWSC
14 State Street & Ramona Expressway [a] Signal
15 State Street & Ramona Boulevard [a] Signal
16 State Street & Cottonwood Avenue/Brinton Street Signal 17 State Street & 7th Street Signal
18 State Street & Esplanade Avenue Signal
19 San Jacinto Avenue & Ramona Expressway Signal
20 San Jacinto Avenue & Main Street/Ramona Boulevard [a] Signal 21 San Jacinto Avenue & 7th Street [a] Signal
22 San Jacinto Avenue & Esplanade Avenue [a] Signal
23 Hewitt Street & Main Street AWSC
24 Hewitt Street & 7th Street AWSC
25 Hewitt Street & Esplanade Avenue Signal
26 Hewitt Street & Commonwealth Avenue Signal
27 Ramona Expressway & Main Street/Lake Park Drive Signal 28 Ramona Expressway & 7th Street Signal
29 Ramona Expressway & Esplanade Avenue Signal
30 Soboba Road & Lake Park Drive Signal
31 Cawston Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue TWSC
32 Cawston Avenue & Esplanade Avenue AWSC
33 Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Boulevard Signal
34 Lyon Avenue & Ramona Boulevard AWSC
35 Ramona Expressway & Hemet Street Signal
Notes:

AWSC – All-Way Stop-Controlled
TWSC – Two-Way Stop-Controlled
[a] – Intersections under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Transportation

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3636 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 32
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 32
Study intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, consistent with the City’s analysis guidelines. The HCM methodology assigns a level of service grade to an intersection based on the average control delay for vehicles at the intersection, ranging from LOS A to LOS F; LOS A signifies very slight delay with no approach phase fully utilized while LOS F signifies very high delays and congestion, frequent cycle failures, and long queues. San Jacinto has established LOS D as the acceptable level of service under the HCM methodology.

Table 9: Intersection Level of Service and Delay Thresholds (HCM Methodology) Source: Highway Capacity Manual
Weekday AM and PM peak hour level of service for the 35 study intersections are shown in Table 10. Data in bold indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F.

Table 10: Existing (2019) Intersection Level of Service – Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours

NUMBER INTERSECTION TRAFFIC

CONTROL

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
1 Warren Road & Ramona Expressway Signal 18.3 B 18.3 B
2 Warren Road & Cottonwood Avenue Signal 16.0 B 15.8 B
3 Warren Road & Esplanade Avenue AWSC 100.5 F 39.2 E
4 Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Expressway Signal 59.9 E 38.6 D 5 Sanderson Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue Signal 29.5 C 21.2 C 6 Sanderson Avenue & 7th Street Signal 15.1 B 17.6 B
7 Sanderson Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal 20.1 C 21.8 C 8 Lyon Avenue & Ramona Expressway Signal 33.8 C 28.4 C
9 Lyon Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue AWSC 34.6 D 17.5 C
10 Lyon Avenue & 7th Street AWSC 30.5 D 40.6 E
11 Lyon Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal 13.9 B 15.8 B
12 State Street & Sagecrest Drive/College
Entrance
Signal 18.7 B 18.4 B
13 State Street & Community College Drive TWSC 22.0 C 45.9 E 14 State Street & Ramona Expressway Signal 26.6 C 38.2 D 15 State Street & Ramona Boulevard Signal 26.3 C 20.9 C 16 State Street & Cottonwood Avenue/Brinton
Street
Signal 19.3 B 15.4 B
17 State Street & 7th Street Signal 17.7 B 20.8 C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3637 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Conditions October 7, 2021 Page 33
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 33

NUMBER INTERSECTION TRAFFIC

CONTROL

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR

DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
18 State Street & Esplanade Avenue Signal 21.2 C 28.5 C 19 San Jacinto Avenue & Ramona Expressway Signal 12.7 B 10.7 B 20 San Jacinto Avenue & Main Street/Ramona
Boulevard
Signal 39.5 D 34.6 C
21 San Jacinto Avenue & 7th Street Signal 17.0 B 21.1 C 22 San Jacinto Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal 22.6 C 30.1 C 23 Hewitt Street & Main Street AWSC 11.3 B 10.4 B
24 Hewitt Street & 7th Street AWSC 78.8 F 17.6 C
25 Hewitt Street & Esplanade Avenue Signal 18.0 B 19.9 B 26 Hewitt Street & Commonwealth Avenue Signal 19.2 B 21.3 C 27 Ramona Expressway & Main Street/Lake
Park Drive
Signal 18.6 B 23.2 C
28 Ramona Expressway & 7th Street Signal 12.1 B 11.5 B
29 Ramona Expressway & Esplanade Avenue Signal 23.7 C 19.8 B 30 Soboba Road & Lake Park Drive Signal 12.1 B 12.7 B
31 Cawston Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue TWSC 11.2 B 10.4 B 32 Cawston Avenue & Esplanade Avenue AWSC 26.6 D 15.4 C 33 Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Boulevard Signal 16.6 B 13.4 B 34 Lyon Avenue & Ramona Boulevard AWSC 10.8 B 11.1 B
35 Ramona Expressway & Hemet Street Signal 20.0 B 13.8 B Source: Kittelson, 2021.

The following intersections currently operate with LOS below City standards during the weekday AM and/or PM peak hour:
• 3: Warren Road & Esplanade Avenue (LOS F during the weekday AM peak hour and LOS E during the weekday PM peak hour)
• 4: Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Expressway (LOS E during the weekday AM peak hour) • 10: Lyon Avenue & 7th Street (LOS E during the weekday PM peak hour) • 13: State Street & Community College Drive (LOS F during the weekday PM peak hour) • 24: Hewitt Street & 7th Street (LOS F during the weekday AM peak hour)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3638 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramon
aExpy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
CottonwoodAve
Espl
anadeA
v
e
Soboba Rd
State St
MenloAve
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
M
a
i
n
S
t
C
o
m
m
o
n
w
e
a
l
t
h
Av
e
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7thSt
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7thSt
RecordRd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
D
e
e
g
a
n
S
t
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
E
x
p
y
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm Ave
olumbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
OaklandAve
UV79
UV79
!!!
!
!!!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!
!!!!
!!
!
!!
!!
!
!
123
4 567
8 91011
12 13
1415 161718
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 35
30 31
32 33
34 CITYOFSANJACINTO
GENERALPLAN2040
Figure8.

LocationofStudyIntersections
Legend
!
StudyIntersections
NeighboringCity
Waterbodies
CityPark
SanJacintoSphereofInfluence
CityofSanJacinto
HEMET

BEAUMONT
P

00.51 Miles
San Jacinto
River
San Jacinto River
Sources:CityofSanJacinto;RiversideCounty.

Mapdate:January25,2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3639 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) C:\Users\jsuhaimi\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_25668\23272 figures_20210316.dwg Jun 10, 2021 - 12:51pm - jsuhaimi Layout Tab: Fig01 Existing
Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometries
San Jacinto, California 9
San Jacinto General Plan Update August 2019
Figure
12 State St & College Entrance
Sagecrest Dr
College Entrance State St 131(96) 453(391) 229(88)
34(38)222(525)44(8)
11(6)
42(16)
132(51)
33(105)
3(6)
7(31)
11 Esplanade Ave & Lyon Ave
Lyon Ave
Esplanade Ave
19(17)
142(194)
45(82)
35(24)154(233)43(44)
14(24)
346(403)
23(25)
44(70)
304(352)
55(64)
10 Lyon Ave & 7th St 9
Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave 8Lyon Ave & Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Lyon Ave Potter Rd 158(122)
1(3)
80(39)
2(7)1(8)1(5)
85(157)
892(1221)
2(3)
39(45)
952(742)
4(3) 7
Sanderson Ave & Esplanade Ave
Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave 78(64)
758(635)
80(92)
59(86)657(976)82(107)
25(30)
122(169)
105(76)
113(142)
173(199)
35(43) 6
Sanderson Ave & 7th St
7th St Sanderson Ave 21(35)
804(616)
80(123)
21(21)616(1006)31(64)
89(105)
32(38)
7(8)
123(124)
96(94)
51(48) 5
Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave
Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave 83(22)
546(466)
62(92)
77(112)476(988)28(106)
90(51)
252(219)
109(77)
80(88)
399(122)
90(59) 4
Sanderson Ave & Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Sanderson Ave 144(87)
996(582)
77(42)
271(481)608(1207)591(796)
70(147)
307(558)
406(318)
53(48)
438(351)
624(466)
STOP 3 Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave
Esplanade Ave Warren Rd 443(396) 1(3)
117(158)
26(59)321(401)32(85)
40(35)
48(21)
3(3)
36(48)
137(96)
68(40) 2 Warren Rd & Cottonwood Ave
Cottonwood Ave Warren Rd 12(20)
451(321)
98(117)
2(15)249(464)33(125)
23(19)
30(23)
6(4)
110(58)
15(30)
113(59) 1 Warren Rd & Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Warren Rd 285(137)
2(0)
362(265)
0(2)0(1)0(4)
128(276)
536(768)
0(1)
197(310)
693(667)
2(3)
- Stop Sign
- Traffic Signal
AM(PM) - Traffic Volume
STOP - All-Way Stop
STOP Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave
164(169)
23(28)34(21)
292(225)
27(17)
17(19)
92(56)122(182)14(17)
367(257)
26(34)
105(73)
STOP 7th St Lyon Ave
172(176)
34(34)43(37)
255(307)
33(59)
32(38)
11(11)163(206)36(36)
233(272)
20(#)
12(10)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3640 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) H:\23\23272 - San Jacinto General Plan Update_EIR\design\Exhibits\figures\23272 figures_20210316.dwg Jun 15, 2021 - 11:53am - jsuhaimi Layout Tab: Fig02 Existing
Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometries
San Jacinto, California 9
San Jacinto General Plan Update August 2019
Figure
STOP
24 Hewitt St & 7th St
E 7th St S Hewitt St 243(162) 114(73)
78(56)
35(35)180(213)38(15)
218(199)
28(52)
69(91)
240(135)
58(69)
49(9)
23 Hewitt St & Main St
Main St S Hewitt St 191(96)
115(125)
124(116)
120(139)
106(128)
138(125)
22 San Jacinto Ave & Esplanade Ave
W Esplanade Ave
E Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave 155(232) 307(604) 48(109) 61(88)380(508)102(150)
165(227)
284(432)
76(121)
90(147)
387(414)
62(77)
21 San Jacinto Ave & 7th St
7th St San Jacinto Ave 76(200)
333(475)
70(128)
29(28)363(462)59(69)
77(166)
202(255)
32(43)
77(121)
268(225)
118(33)
19 San Jacinto Ave & Ramona Expy
W Ramona Expy San Jacinto Ave Bergin St
308(180)
1(0)
138(39)
0(0)0(1)0(1)
238(191)
475(887)
0(1)
153(33)
965(471)
0(1)
18 State St & Esplanade Ave
W Esplanade Ave State St 45(80)
513(511)105(118)
71(100)538(563)143(209)
55(53)
299(453)
47(84)
84(134)
348(460)
127(172)
17 State St & 7th St
7th St State St 40(81)
567(568)
48(93)
55(62)661(669)57(100)
49(86)
224(279)
53(58)
85(106)
277(295)
81(80)
16 State St & Cottonwood Ave
Cottonwood Ave N Brinton St State St 48(87) 692(644) 4(9) 185(114) 750(732) 7(26) 79(90)
63(56)
244(120)
8(15)
46(53)
11(24)
15 State St & Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd State St 83(83)
672(628)
160(45)
28(17)612(693)127(201)
86(97)
195(137)
46(41)
150(73)
211(142)
183(220)
14 State St & Ramona Expy
W Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy State St 311(359) 502(469) 90(84)
52(110)273(450)77(198)
421(407)
446(696)
180(139)
172(106)
703(406)
261(138)
13 State St & Community College Dr
W Community College Dr State St7(23)
784(530)
96(42)
1(0)316(612)47(51)
0(1)
4(0)
15(19)
1(0)
16(49)
58(41)
- Stop Sign
- Traffic Signal
AM(PM) - Traffic Volume
STOP - All-Way Stop
Main Street San Jacinto Ave 7(14)
243(257)193(200)
38(20)
261(216)
7(5)
20 San Jacinto Ave & Main St/Ramona Blvd Ramona Blvd
61(31)
60(72)
6(7)
19(17)
2(2)
48(76)
157(218)
2(1)
0(5) 42(41) 1(6)
5(28)
15(27)
14(37)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3641 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) C:\Users\jsuhaimi\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_25668\23272 figures_20210316.dwg Jun 10, 2021 - 12:51pm - jsuhaimi Layout Tab: Fig03 Existing
Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometries
San Jacinto, California 9
San Jacinto General Plan Update August 2019
Figure
35 Ramona Expy & Hemet St
Hemet St
Ramona Expy Mountain Ave 14(31)
620(406)
4(4)
103(195)300(642)6(12)
17(11)
12(24)
207(103)
10(9)
33(7)
11(11)
STOP
34 Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave
Lyon Ave Ramona Blvd 134(107) 21(16)
30(20)
40(92)130(140)30(13)
183(145)
37(41)
16(11)
87(175)
12(31)
18(20)
33 Sanderson Ave & Ramona Blvd Sanderson Ave 984(620) 26(44) 578(1114) 84(212) 39(26)
149(123)
32 Cawaston Ave & Esplanade Ave 31 Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave Cottonwood Ave Cawston Ave 29(15)
84(53)
19(43)
247(243)
71(57)
223(173)
30 Soboba Rd & Lake Park Dr
Lake Park Dr Soboba Rd 79(102)
23(31)
0(1)
85(254)40(15)0(0)
97(70)
3(0)
193(102)
2(1)
1(0)
0(0)
29 Ramona Expy & Esplanade Ave
E Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
123(126)719(337)
180(254)346(691)
69(185)
273(158)
28 Ramona Expy & 7th St
E 7th St Mountain Ave Ramona Expy
66(34)
996(505)
0(10)
61(51)455(903)5(18)
1(2)
78(57)
112(62)
4(2)
0(6)
0(2)
27 Ramona Expy & Main St
Main St Lake Park Dr W Ramona Expy 56(42) 836(335) 212(215) 36(20) 412(649) 57(83) 42(26)
93(146)
26(10)
94(287)
75(127)
43(59)
26 Hewitt St & Commonwealth Ave
E Commonwealth AveS Hewitt St 56(87)
309(321)
65(38)
62(93)279(358)18(18)
75(165)
30(140)
31(90)
47(16)
137(106)
23(14)
25 Hewitt St & Esplanade Ave
E Esplanade Ave S Hewitt St 106(104)
220(241)
41(63)
114(130)225(281)56(39)
80(156)
271(410)
47(113)
58(43)
359(285)
66(30)
- Stop Sign
- Traffic Signal
AM(PM) - Traffic Volume
STOP - All-Way Stop
STOP Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave 45(39) 151(128) 7(13)
131(176)
48(37)
159(56)
138(129)
181(99)
12(36) 61(51) 97(95) 109(56)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3642 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Cumulative Level of Service Analysis

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3643 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 39
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 39

LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
This chapter provides an assessment of roadway operations for the long-term buildout Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan Conditions. Under the requirements of SB 743, metrics such as LOS can no longer be used to assess transportation related CEQA impacts. Therefore, this chapter provides roadway segment and intersection level of service for informational purposes and to provide a baseline for general plan consistency evaluations. The LOS for these facilities are compared to existing conditions; where needed, and recommended improvements are provided to bring operations to within City standards and attain the City’s goals for traffic flow and system efficiency.

TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTING
Cumulative (2040) average daily traffic (ADT) roadway segments volumes for the 2040 Plus Plan scenario were developed using the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2016 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) model. Traffic growth factors were derived for each roadway segment by comparing base year daily volumes to the 2040 Plus Plan (2040) daily model volumes. These growth factors were applied to existing year (2019) ADT to forecast the future year (2040) ADT.4 It should be noted that some of the factored future year turn movements may end up lower than the existing year turning movement counts due to major road network changes such as the realignment of SR 79 and the new Mid-County Parkway (as described below), which are projected to divert traffic away from local roadway segments.

ASSUMED FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
As part of both the travel demand modeling and the roadway segment and intersection operational analyses, roadway improvements were included as part of the 2040 assumptions. Improvements were included from the following sources, which are included in Appendix 3:
• Roadway widening and lane additions that are assumed to be in place by 2040 (e.g., committed funding).
• Intersection improvements proposed as part of the City’s 2019-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
• Intersection improvements included as part of the SCAG model. 4 The procedure for estimating future year intersection turn movements is a two-step process, based on procedures described in NCHRP 765, “Analytical Travel Forecasting Approaches for Project-Level Planning and Design,” (Transportation Research Board, 2014) which is the successor report to NCHRP 255. This adjustment process is recommended given that travel models are calibrated to produce more accurate results on road segments than on individual turn movements. First, the future year (2040) link volumes entering and exiting each leg of the intersections are estimated based on existing traffic counts and growth rates calculated from the base year and future year of the SCAG model. Second, the existing year turn movement counts are iteratively factored until the total volumes in and out of each leg closely match the estimated future year link volumes. The factoring process used for Step 2 is named after its developer, Furness. This factoring process produces forecast turn distributions that resemble the count distribution, but turn movement proportions will change in response to different growth rates on different legs as forecast by the travel model.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3644 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 40
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 40
Two projects included the assumed future roadway improvements have a substantive impact on future projected traffic volumes:
• SR 79 realignment: The project proposes to realign SR 79 between Domenigoni Parkway and Gilman Springs through San Jacinto. The realigned, grade-separated highway would serve north-south trips from, to, and through San Jacinto. A conceptual alignment is shown (as a blue line) in Exhibit 1 below. This project would have the following general effects on local San Jacinto traffic patterns:
o It provides an alternative, higher-speed north-south route compared to the existing Sanderson Road/SR 79 route in the north of the City, reducing expected traffic volumes along portions of that road.
o It provides a redundant, higher-speed north-south route compared to existing Warren Road in the south of the City, reducing expected traffic volumes along that road. o Access at an interchange on Cottonwood Avenue increases projected traffic volumes along that road.
• Mid-County Parkway: The Mid-County Parkway is a planned 16-mile transportation corridor extending from San Jacinto to Perris in the west currently under construction. It will be a gradeseparated facility connecting to SR 79 (see above), Interstate 215, and multimodal bus and rail facilities that support Metrolink’s 91/Perris Valley Line. A conceptual alignment (which was selected as the preferred alignment) is shown in green in Exhibit 1. This project would have the following general effects on local San Jacinto traffic patterns:
o It provides an alternative, higher-speed east-west route compared to the existing Ramona Expressway extending west from City limits, reducing expected traffic volumes along portions of that road.

Both projects will substantially affect intersections within their proximity as access to and from gradeseparated portions of the roadway is designed. Appendix 3 includes geometric approval drawings related to interchanges within San Jacinto. Some of the changes that affect this analysis include the following:
• Intersection 1 – Warren Road & Ramona Expressway: This intersection will be realigned north of its existing location and north of an interchange with the Mid-County Parkway. The intersection is modeled without a west leg (see sheet GAD-G1 in Appendix 3). • Intersection 4 – Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Expressway: This intersection currently serves two major connections that will be replaced by SR 79 and the Mid-County Parkway: north-south connections along Sanderson Avenue to connect to SR 79 north of the City, and east-west connections along Ramona Expressway that will be replaced by the Mid-County Parkway. Therefore, this intersection is modeled to show significant decreases in traffic and is removed from this intersection analysis.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3645 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 41
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 41
Exhibit 1: Proposed SR 79 and Mid-County Parkway alignments through San Jacinto Source: City of San Jacinto

ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS
The daily roadway segment volumes and operations under the Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan scenario are shown in Table 11. The daily roadway segment LOS was used to develop recommended roadway segment improvements for segments that either:
• Degraded from LOS A/B/C/D under Existing Conditions to LOS E/F under Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan conditions
• Operate at LOS E/F under Existing Conditions and volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) increased by greater than 0.05 (i.e., 5 percent) under Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan conditions.

SEGMENT ANALYSIS RESULTS
The existing (2019) roadway LOS and the Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan roadway segment LOS under these capacities are summarized in Table 11.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3646 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 42
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 42
Table 11: Roadway Level of Service
Roadway Segment
Existing 2019 Cumulative 2040 Plus Plan
Roadway Type1 ADT V/C LOS Roadway Type1 ADT V/C LOS
+/-
V/C
Ramona
Expressway
West of Warren Road Collector, 2U2 22,629 1.27 F Primary Arterial, 4D
-
3 0.00 A -1.27
West of Sanderson Avenue Primary Arterial,
4D
24,155 0.61 B Primary Arterial,
6D
10,174 0.18 A -0.43
East of Lyon Avenue LACH, 6D 27,017 0.46 A LACH, 6D 34,141 0.58 A 0.12 East of State Street and Eagle
Road
Primary Arterial,
4D4
23,861 0.61 B Primary Arterial,
4D
46,217 1.18 F 0.57
South of Esplanade Avenue Collector, 2U 18,706 1.05 F Arterial, 4U 10,787 0.33 A -0.72 Warren Road
South of Ramona Expressway Collector, 2U 11,778 0.66 B Arterial, 4U 5,372 0.16 A -0.50 South of Esplanade Avenue Collector, 2U 13,891 0.78 C Arterial, 4U 13,353 0.41 A -0.37 Sanderson Avenue
North of Ramona Expressway Primary Arterial,
4D
49,645 1.26 F Primary Arterial,
4D
- 0.00 A -1.26
South of Ramona Boulevard Primary Arterial,
4D
23,515 0.60 A Primary Arterial,
4D
22,568 0.57 A -0.02
South of Esplanade Avenue Primary Arterial,
4D
26,071 0.66 B Primary Arterial,
4D
33,788 0.86 C 0.20
Lyon Avenue South of Esplanade Avenue Collector, 2U 7,418 0.42 A Collector, 2U 10,138 0.57 A 0.15 State Street
North of College Entrance Arterial, 4D 14,094 0.39 A Arterial, 4D 26,714 0.75 D 0.35 South of Ramona Expressway Primary Arterial,
4D
24,139 0.61 B Primary Arterial,
4D
37,777 0.96 E 0.35
South of Esplanade Avenue Primary Arterial,
4D
19,520 0.50 A Primary Arterial,
4D
25,912 0.66 B 0.16
Cottonwood
Avenue
West of State Street Collector, 2D 7,317 0.40 A Collector, 2D 12,438 0.68 B 0.28

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3647 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 43
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Roadway Segment
Existing 2019 Cumulative 2040 Plus Plan
Roadway Type1 ADT V/C LOS Roadway Type1 ADT V/C LOS
+/-
V/C
7th Street West of State Street Collector, 2D 10,039 0.55 A Collector, 2D 9,667 0.53 A -0.02 San Jacinto Avenue
South of Esplanade Avenue Primary Arterial,
4D
21,546 0.55 A Primary Arterial,
4D
25,700 0.65 B 0.11
Esplanade Avenue West of Ramona Expressway Arterial, 4U 10,045 0.31 A Arterial, 4U 14,997 0.46 A 0.15 Lake Park Drive East of Ramona Expressway Arterial, 4D5 12,250 0.34 A Arterial, 4D 18,986 0.53 A 0.19 Notes:

BOLD – Represents roadway segments operating at LOS E or F. ADT = Average Daily Traffic. V/C = volume-to-capacity ratio.

1. “Roadway Type” denotes lane number and roadway configuration: 2U= 2-lane undivided, 4D= 4-lane divided, etc.

2. Existing classification is Major roadway but roadway type shown most closely matches existing cross-section and is used to evaluate operational capacity.

3. Future year ADT is projected to decrease as a result of the Mid-County Parkway project.

4. Existing classification is Limited-Access California Highway, but roadway type shown most closely matches existing cross-section and is used to evaluate operational capacity.

5. Existing classification is Collector, but roadway type shown most closely matches existing cross-section and is used to evaluate operational capacity.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3648 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 44
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Under Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan conditions, the following segments are projected to degrade to below the City LOS standards:
• Ramona Expressway, east of State Street
• State Street, south of Ramona Expressway

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Roadway improvements are recommended along facilities that are projected to operate at LOS E or F conditions under the Cumulative plus Plan scenario. The roadway segment volume-to-capacity ratio analysis provides a more general level of analysis than corresponding intersection analysis. Therefore, the roadway segments where recommended improvements are identified should be monitored, and adjacent intersections should be analyzed for capacity needs as future development is realized.

Ramona Expressway, east of Eagle Road. Under the Cumulative Plus Plan scenario, this segment would degrade from LOS B to LOS F. With the addition of one lane in each direction, this segment should operate within City LOS standards. Additional right-of-way is available on the northern half of the roadway for this improvement. The segment includes a six-lane cross-section on intersection approach but not along the roadway segment between intersections.

State Street, south of Ramona Expressway (from Ramona Expressway to Ramona Boulevard). Under the Cumulative Plus Plan scenario, this segment would degrade from LOS B to LOS E. With the addition of one lane in each direction, this segment should operate within City LOS standards. Right-of-way is available for much of the corridor south of Ramona Expressway and north of Ramona Boulevard for this improvement, but there may be some geometric constraints if the City considers pursuing this improvement.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
The weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes and lane configurations for the Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan scenario are shown in Figure 10. The AM and PM operations under the Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan scenario are shown in Table 12. Recommendations were identified for intersections shown to operate below the City’s LOS standard of D or better.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3649 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 45
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Table 12: Future Intersection Level of Service – Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours # Intersection
Control Peak
Hour
Existing 2040 Plus
Plan Change
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Warren Road & Ramona Expressway Signal AM 18.3 B 10.8 B -7.5 PM 18.3 B 9.6 A -3.9
2 Warren Road & Cottonwood Avenue Signal AM 16.0 B 14.5 B -1.5 PM 15.8 B 14.2 B -1.6
3 Warren Road & Esplanade Avenue AWSC AM 100.5 F 26.2 D -74.3 PM 39.2 E 76.4 F 37.2
4 Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Expressway1
Signal AM 59.9 E - - -
PM 38.6 D - - -
5 Sanderson Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue Signal AM 29.5 C 32.3 C 2.8 PM 21.2 C 28.5 C 7.3
6 Sanderson Avenue & 7th Street Signal AM 15.1 B 18.4 B 3.3 PM 17.6 B 22.6 C 5.0
7 Sanderson Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal AM 20.1 C 24.7 C 4.6 PM 21.8 C 28.1 C 6.3
8 Lyon Avenue & Ramona Expressway Signal AM 33.8 C 56.5 E 22.7 PM 28.4 C 60.4 E 32
9 Lyon Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue AWSC AM 34.6 D 168.4 F 133.8 PM 17.5 C 194.8 F 177.3
10 Lyon Avenue & 7th Street AWSC AM 30.5 D 21.6 C -8.9
PM 40.6 E 100.6 F 60.0
11 Lyon Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal AM 13.9 B 16.8 B 2.9 PM 15.8 B 19.8 B 4.0
12 State Street & Sagecrest Drive/College
Entrance
Signal AM 18.7 B 46.4 D 27.7
PM 18.4 B 23.6 C 5.2
13 State Street & Community College Drive TWSC AM 22.0 C 144.5 F 122.5 PM 45.9 E 457.9 F 412
14 State Street & Ramona Expressway Signal AM 26.6 C 56.1 E 29.5 PM 38.2 D 83.2 F 45.0
15 State Street & Ramona Boulevard Signal AM 26.3 C 38.3 D 12.0 PM 20.9 C 34.5 C 13.6
16 State Street & Cottonwood Avenue/Brinton
Street
Signal AM 19.3 B 27.6 C 8.3
PM 15.4 B 22.3 C 6.9
17 State Street & 7th Street Signal AM 17.7 B 17.1 B -0.6 PM 20.8 C 27.8 C 7.0
18 State Street & Esplanade Avenue Signal AM 21.2 C 31.2 C 10.0 PM 28.5 C 49.8 D 21.3
19 San Jacinto Avenue & Ramona Expressway Signal AM 12.7 B 21.3 C 8.6 PM 10.7 B 21.5 C 10.8
20 San Jacinto Avenue & Main Street/Ramona
Boulevard
Signal AM 39.5 D 48.6 D 9.1
PM 34.6 C 48.0 D 13.4
21 San Jacinto Avenue & 7th Street Signal AM 17.0 B 18.2 B 1.2 PM 21.1 C 23.3 C 2.2
22 San Jacinto Avenue & Esplanade Avenue Signal AM 22.6 C 24.1 C 1.5 PM 30.1 C 32.3 C 2.2
23 Hewitt Street & Main Street AWSC AM 11.3 B 11.1 B -0.2 PM 10.4 B 11.2 B 0.8
24 Hewitt Street & 7th Street AWSC AM 78.8 F 31.4 D -47.4

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3650 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 46
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
# Intersection
Control Peak
Hour
Existing 2040 Plus
Plan Change
Delay LOS Delay LOS
PM 17.6 C 13.6 B -4.0
25 Hewitt Street & Esplanade Avenue Signal AM 18.0 B 16.5 B -1.5 PM 19.9 B 16.8 B -3.1
26 Hewitt Street & Commonwealth Avenue Signal AM 19.2 B 13.3 B -5.9 PM 21.3 C 18.8 B -2.5
27 Ramona Expressway & Main Street/Lake Park
Drive
Signal AM 18.6 B 20.3 C 1.7
PM 23.2 C 36.0 D 12.8
28 Ramona Expressway & 7th Street Signal AM 12.1 B 11.1 B -1.0 PM 11.5 B 11.3 B -0.2
29 Ramona Expressway & Esplanade Avenue Signal AM 23.7 C 44.0 D 20.3 PM 19.8 B 30.7 C 10.9
30 Soboba Road & Lake Park Drive Signal AM 12.1 B 14.3 B 2.2 PM 12.7 B 10.8 B -1.9
31 Cawston Avenue & Cottonwood Avenue TWSC AM 11.2 B 10.2 B -1.0 PM 10.4 B 9.6 A -0.8
32 Cawston Avenue & Esplanade Avenue AWSC AM 26.6 D 54.4 F 27.8 PM 15.4 C 56.5 F 41.1
33 Sanderson Avenue & Ramona Boulevard Signal AM 16.6 B 8.7 A -7.9 PM 13.4 B 16.2 B 2.8
34 Lyon Avenue & Ramona Boulevard AWSC AM 10.8 B 17.9 C 7.1 PM 11.1 B 42.2 E 31.1
35 Ramona Expressway & Hemet Street Signal AM 20.0 B 14.4 B -5.6 PM 13.8 B 12.8 B -1.0
Notes: AWSC – All-Way Stop-Controlled. TWSC – Two-Way Stop-Controlled

1. Intersection removed from this analysis per discussion in Assumed Future Roadway Improvements beginning on page 39.

Under Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan conditions, the following unsignalized intersections are projected to operate below the City LOS standards:
• 3: Warren Road & Esplanade Avenue in the PM peak hour • 9: Lyon Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue in the AM and PM peak hours • 10: Lyon Avenue and 7th Street in the PM peak hour
• 13: State Street & Community College Drive in the AM and PM peak hours • 32: Cawston Avenue and Esplanade Avenue in the AM and PM peak hours • 34: Lyon Avenue and Ramona Boulevard in the PM peak hour Additionally, the following signalized intersections are projected to operate below the City LOS standards:
• 8: Lyon Avenue and Ramona Expressway in the AM and PM peak hours • 14: State Street and Ramona Expressway in the AM and PM peak hours

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Intersection improvements are recommended to accommodate AM and PM peak hour traffic levels under the Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan scenario under the HCM methodology. These improvements consist of either intersection lane geometry and/or signal timing changes. As land use projects throughout the City are approved and developed, the City should continue to monitor conditions at these intersections to determine the appropriate timing and/or level of improvement along these facilities. The updated mobility element includes a recommended policy (M-7.1) to leverage funding sources to fund the transportation

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3651 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 47
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
system. Based on the analysis in this report, a focus area can be funding intersection control upgrades listed below.

Where improvements include converting unsignalized intersections to signalized, a basic two-phase signalized intersection without lane geometry changes was shown to improve LOS to within City standards.

For signalization improvement recommendations, left-turn provisions were included consistent with the City’s study guidelines. Signal recommendations related to left-turn provision follow the City’s analysis guidelines, testing the following:
• A dedicated left-turn lane when peak hour left-turn volume exceeds 100 vehicles per hour; • A dual left-turn lane when peak hour left-turn volume exceeds 300 vehicles per hour; or, • A protected left-turn phase when peak hour left-turn volume exceeds 240 vehicles per hour.

The City may subsequently consider appropriate geometric and signal design considerations at these locations. The following intersection improvements could be implemented:
3: Warren Road and Esplanade Avenue. This unsignalized intersection would operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour. This intersection would operate within City LOS standards if signalized, with dedicated westbound and southbound left-turn lanes (and corresponding single shared through/right-turn lanes). 8: Lyon Avenue and Ramona Expressway. This signalized intersection would operate at LOS E during both the AM and PM peak hours. Optimizing the cycle length would bring the intersection within City LOS standards.
9: Lyon Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. This unsignalized intersection operates at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours. This intersection would operate within City LOS standards if signalized with dedicated eastbound and southbound left-turn lanes (which already exist). The intersection operates within City LOS standards without the addition of a westbound left-turn lane, but City analysis guidelines indicate one may be desirable given the projected left-turn traffic volumes. The addition of a westbound left-turn lane would require widening at the intersection. 10: Lyon Avenue and 7th Street. This unsignalized intersection operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour.

This intersection would operate within City LOS standards if signalized. 13: State Street & Community College Drive. This unsignalized intersection operates at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours. This intersection would operate within City LOS standards if signalized. 14: State Street and Ramona Expressway. This signalized intersection operates at LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour. In the AM peak hour, the intersection would operate within City LOS standards with the cycle length optimized and the eastbound right-turn and westbound right-turn phases changed to a permitted plus overlap phases (i.e., allowed to operate concurrently with non-conflicting protected left-turn phases). In the PM peak hour, the intersection would operate within City LOS standards with the southbound approach restriped to accommodate one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a dedicated right-turn lane. This geometric change may either require some widening or reconfiguration of the approach to reallocate existing width.
32: Cawston Avenue and Esplanade Avenue. This unsignalized intersection operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour. This intersection would operate within City LOS standards if signalized. The intersection operates within City LOS standards without the addition of an eastbound left-turn lane, but City analysis guidelines indicate one may be desirable given the projected left-turn traffic volumes. The addition of an eastbound left-turn lane would require widening at the intersection. 34: Lyon Avenue and Ramona Boulevard. This unsignalized intersection operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. This intersection would operate within City LOS standards if signalized. The intersection operates within City LOS standards without the addition of a southbound left-turn lane, but City analysis guidelines indicate one may be desirable given the projected left-turn traffic volumes. The addition of a southbound left-turn lane would require widening at the intersection.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3652 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) H:\23\23272 - San Jacinto General Plan Update_EIR\design\Exhibits\figures\23272 figures 2040 _v2.dwg Jun 11, 2021 - 4:21pm - jsuhaimi Layout Tab: Fig01 2040 Plus Plan
Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometries
San Jacinto, California 10
San Jacinto General Plan Update
Figure
- Stop Sign
- Traffic Signal
AM(PM) - Traffic Volume
STOP - All-Way Stop
204(150)
1119(782)
357(137)
53(59)595(1105)69(12)
17(9)
66(25)
206(80)
51(164)
5(9)
11(48)
27(27)
172(244)
83(129)
34(16)189(278)56(29)
19(50)
505(486)
22(24)
71(141)
395(403)
61(58) 448(422) 1(3) 194(127)
2(7)1(8)1(5)
314(493)
1068(1400)
2(3)
123(145)
1117(994)
4(3)
95(76)
814(730)133(113)
91(120)880(1144)168(154)
31(52)
231(344)
134(149)
146(152)
259(254)
47(53)
21(27)
844(862)207(124)
21(16)996(1182)43(62)
89(97)
32(43)
7(11)
149(233)
96(118)
20(102)
STOP
187(386)
3(10)
187(386)227(367)
57(140)345(378)345(378)52(144)
181(176)
11(11)
181(176)
82(57)
121(171)
251(159)
121(171)
52(48)
32(20)
296(566)
98(117)
97(15)504(680)33(83)
23(19)
30(23)
44(4)
110(58)
15(30)
17(26)
2(0)
362(139)
0(1)0(4)
131(310)
2(3)
12 State St & College Entrance 11 Esplanade Ave & Lyon Ave 10 Lyon Ave & 7th St 9 Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave 8Lyon Ave & Ramona Expy 7Sanderson Ave & Esplanade Ave 6 Sanderson Ave & 7th St 5Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave 3 Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave 2 Warren Rd & Cottonwood Ave 1 Warren Rd & Ramona Expy Cottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave 19(10)
527(689)156(226)
24(52)667(1089)88(284)
54(15)
366(182)
58(35)
289(219)
382(144)
297(204)
STOP Cottonwood Ave Lyon Ave
202(65)
49(28)
46(272)
461(225)
42(191)
15(246)
125(56)165(66)11(237)
516(257)
57(34)
135(73)
STOP 7th St Lyon Ave
195(238)
72(44)
7(42)
144(386)
4(62)
10(50)
58(14)200(221)16(40)
285(344)
62(26)
83(15)
Sagecrest Dr
College Entrance State St
Lyon Ave
Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
Lyon Ave Potter Rd
Esplanade Ave Sanderson Ave
7th St Sanderson AveCottonwood Ave Sanderson Ave
Esplanade Ave Warren RdCottonwood Ave Warren Rd Warren Rd Cottonwood Ave
Lyon Ave
7th St
Lyon Ave

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3653 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) H:\23\23272 - San Jacinto General Plan Update_EIR\design\Exhibits\figures\23272 figures 2040 _v2.dwg Jun 15, 2021 - 11:54am - jsuhaimi Layout Tab: Fig02 2040 Plus Plan
Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometries
San Jacinto, California 10
San Jacinto General Plan Update
Figure
- Stop Sign
- Traffic Signal
AM(PM) - Traffic Volume
STOP - All-Way Stop
STOP
114(90)51(154)
78(40)
35(20)318(133)38(4)
218(154)
28(54)
69(132)
240(124)
58(69)
49(6)
113(66)93(148)
188(242)
()
108(64)
131(96)
217(238)
114(291)403(829)
71(104)
49(118)443(701)162(155)
195(182)
453(234)
109(105)
72(144)
191(392)
62(81)
76(213)
637(593)
70(138)
29(33)598(633)59(83)
77(187)
202(247)
32(49)
77(135)
268(212)
118(37)
329(248)
1(0)
201(69)
0(0)0(1)0(1)
290(250)
1073(1871)
0(1)
221(71)
1939(1229)
0(1)
170(159)665(765)
122(48)
273(193)749(732)169(80)
109(143)
502(410)
89(250)
20(117)
290(605)
28(168)
21(155)
710(1004)
32(62)
47(151)1150(847)59(87)
62(114)
149(251)
69(140)
97(44)
120(264)
93(68)
65(128)
815(979)
10(16)
261(149)1015(881)17(41)
98(125)
144(99)
276(185)
17(30)
103(113)
22(53)
49(140)
902(1196)
209(91)
16(21)1136(1028)161(296)
126(41)
184(56)
45(17)
280(88)
114(139)
232(253)
284(530)733(731)142(172)
63(177)472(731)157(439)
547(479)
687(1152)
255(172)
384(181)
1124(688)
630(247)
11(36)
1473(898)
150(66)
2(0)614(1184)73(80)
0(2)
6(0)
23(30)
2(0)
25(76)
90(64)
24 Hewitt St & 7th St 23 Hewitt St & Main St 22 San Jacinto Ave & Esplanade Ave 21 San Jacinto Ave & 7th St 19 San Jacinto Ave & Ramona Expy 18 State St & Esplanade Ave 17 State St & 7th St 16 State St & Cottonwood Ave 15 State St & Ramona Blvd 14 State St & Ramona Expy 13 State St & Community College Dr 20 San Jacinto Ave & Main St/Ramona Blvd
Main Street San Jacinto Ave 7(15)
450(420)161(170)
28(18)
258(222)
3(3)
Ramona Blvd
41(21)
93(95)
6(7)
18(22)
2(2)
54(118)
164(228)
2(1)
0(5) 44(43) 1(6)
5(29)
41(72)
29(55)
E 7th St S Hewitt StMain St S Hewitt StW Esplanade Ave
E Esplanade Ave San Jacinto Ave
7th St San Jacinto AveW Ramona Expy San Jacinto Ave
W Esplanade Ave State St7th St State StCottonwood Ave N Brinton St State St Ramona Blvd State StW Ramona Expy State StW Community College Dr State St

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3654 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) H:\23\23272 - San Jacinto General Plan Update_EIR\design\Exhibits\figures\23272 figures 2040 _v2.dwg Jun 11, 2021 - 4:21pm - jsuhaimi Layout Tab: Fig03 2040 Plus Plan
Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometries
San Jacinto, California 10
San Jacinto General Plan Update
Figure
- Stop Sign
- Traffic Signal
AM(PM) - Traffic Volume
STOP - All-Way Stop
45(56)
262(186)
4(4)
72(169)129(302)6(12)
17(11)
52(41)
196(81)
10(9)
33(7)
11(11)
STOP
61(60)
12(3)
189(91)
12(24)24(46)114(79)
299(396)
3(15)
1(2)
302(383)
45(99)
65(112)
745(543)
54(65)
480(734)19(212)
98(178)
38(123)
19(15)92(50)
24(38)
257(120)
62(58)
79(114)
176(102)
23(31)
0(1)
4(137)128(15)0(0)
97(70)
3(0)
193(11)
2(1)
3(0)
0(0)
226(181)
219(81)
0(0)
267(512)86(213)0(0)
0(0)
126(252)
0(0)
468(251)
0(0)
0(0)
0(0)
0(0)
66(34)
1382(752)
0(10)
61(51)719(1326)5(18)
1(2)
78(57)
112(62)
4(2)
0(6)
0(2)
85(63)
1202(586)
130(237)
75(37)624(982)53(116)
65(49)
86(254)
53(26)
108(313)
121(174)
66(95)
44(8)
224(184)
58(10)
63(154)310(115)21(71)
38(105)
15(5)
12(120)
26(2)
66(62)
10(42)
61(68)
171(290)
32(29)
91(34)245(102)58(6)
97(166)
316(222)
55(164)
60(66)
266(324)
64(59)
35 Ramona Expy & Hemet St 34 Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave
33 Sanderson Ave & Ramona Blvd 32 Cawaston Ave & Esplanade Ave 31 Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave 30 Soboba Rd & Lake Park Dr 29 Ramona Expy & Esplanade Ave 28 Ramona Expy & 7th St 27 Ramona Expy & Main St 26 Hewitt St & Commonwealth Ave 25 Hewitt St & Esplanade Ave Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave 61(51) 129(104) 9(21)
221(429)
59(54)
177(78)
237(222)
204(111)
15(42) 73(59) 80(70) 129(81)
Hemet St
Ramona Expy Mountain Ave
Lyon Ave Ramona Blvd Sanderson Ave
Cottonwood Ave Cawston Ave
Lake Park Dr Soboba RdE Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
E 7th St Mountain Ave Ramona Expy
Main St Lake Park Dr W Ramona ExpyE Commonwealth AveS Hewitt StE Esplanade Ave S Hewitt St Esplanade Ave Cawston Ave

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3655 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Transportation Impact Analysis

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3656 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Transportation Impact Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 52
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
This transportation impact analysis assesses how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the implementation of the City of San Jacinto General Plan Update. This section analyzes the expected buildout by 2040, which is expected to result in approximately 30,600 housing units, 102,200 residents, 24,014,700 non-residential square feet, and 25,700 employees.

The potential impacts were identified based on a set of significance criteria based on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The significance criteria are presented below.

STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
For the purposes of this transportation impact analysis, a significant transportation impact would occur if implementation of the Plan would:

1. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities;

2. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b);

3. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment); or,

4. Result in inadequate emergency access.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS
Item 2 above relates to vehicle miles traveled analysis. As part of the new CEQA Guidelines updated for SB 743, the new criteria to replace LOS “shall promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” OPR released a final advisory in December 2018, which provided guidance for implementing VMT analysis as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impact. In 2020, the City of San Jacinto prepared SB 743-consistent transportation analysis guidelines with VMT metrics and significant impact thresholds.

Therefore, this study assesses VMT (as opposed to LOS) to be consistent with State requirements and the City’s new guidelines.

This study assesses the changes in VMT per person between Cumulative (2040) No Project (current General Plan) and Cumulative (2040) Plus Plan (Proposed General Plan Update) conditions to determine if the Plan would result in an increase in VMT per service population (residents + employees) in the City. The comparative modeling results were used to estimate the following:
• Residential VMT per person (Home-based trip VMT per resident in the City); and, • Commuter VMT per person (Work-based trip VMT per employee in the City).

ITEM 1: CONFLICT WITH APPLICABLE PLAN,

ORDINANCE, OR POLICY

CIRCULATION SYSTEM
The Project includes adoption of a new Circulation map that redefines and consolidates the City’s roadway classifications. As a result, some roadways are reclassified to better describe their intended function related to access and mobility. The reclassification of some roadways includes an updated

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3657 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Transportation Impact Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 53
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
definition of their intent, including the provision of design elements that support safe biking and walking along with serving a mobility function. As a result, the plan does not conflict with applicable plans, polices, or ordinances related to vehicle circulation, and its impact is considered less than significant.

Proposed Policies that Address the Impact
• M-1.1 Balanced Circulation System: Provide for a balanced circulation system that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City. • M-1.2 Access and Mobility: Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.

The following related proposed action also addresses this item:
• M-1a: Periodically review and assess the vehicular operating conditions along City facilities to determine what, if any, improvements are warranted to maintain a safe and efficient flow of traffic in the City. Improvements may be identified and included in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and/or required as part of project approval through the development review process.

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
The City of San Jacinto does not have an adopted bicycle or pedestrian master plan or defined measures of effectiveness for bicycle and pedestrian circulation. This evaluation considers whether the proposed plan update would have an adverse impact on the existing bicycle and pedestrian network.

As described above, proposed updated roadway classifications include descriptions of appropriate design features for people biking and walking in line with multimodal City goals. The updated mobility element includes recommended improvements from the Trails Master Plan, which if incorporated would improve bicycle and pedestrian circulation citywide. The recommended trails and bicycle facilities are proposed as part of the proposed General Plan Update and are identified in the TMP are shown in Figure 11.

Additionally, the mobility element developed as part of the plan update contains several policies that support access to and the performance bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Therefore, this plan’s impact is considered less than significant.

Proposed Policies that Address the Impact
• M-3.1 Complete Streets: Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users of all ages and abilities. • M-3.2 Multimodal Facilities: Incorporate facilities and design features into transportation improvement projects that promote and support the use of public transit and active transportation.
• M-3.3 Multimodal Connectivity: Link commercial development, employment centers, public facilities, and community parks and open spaces to transit and active transportation facilities and trails, wherever feasible.
• M-4.1 Trails Master Plan: Implement applicable goals, policies, and projects from the Trails Master Plan to provide trails and multimodal facilities that support active transportation within and beyond the City.
• M-4.2 Active Transportation Network: Provide and maintain an extensive active transportation and trail network that supports bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians and is linked to regional facilities and facilities of adjacent jurisdictions.
• M-4.3 Trail Development: Encourage the use of open space and utility easements for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails, where feasible.
• M-4.4 Trail Connectivity: Encourage Specific Plans and Planned Developments to include welldeveloped and designed trails that connect neighborhoods to parks, schools, jobs, and adjacent existing or planned local and/or regional trails.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3658 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Transportation Impact Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 54
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
• M-4.5 Support Facilities: Encourage new developments to provide bicycle parking, lockers, and other support facilities for bicyclists.

PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM
The City does not have defined measures of effectiveness for public transit service and circulation. The proposed plan update would be expected to increase demand for travel given the proposed development and expected increase in residents and employees. This population and job growth within the City could increase the demand for public transit but also resulting in increased levels of vehicular traffic which could slow transit operations and impact transit reliability. The mobility element developed as part of the plan update includes policies to support and enhance transit service. Therefore, the plan’s impact is considered less than significant.

Proposed Policies that Address the Impact
• M-2.4 Public Transit: Promote public transportation programs that effectively serve the City's residents and workers by connecting users to local and regional destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail, and other activity centers.
• M-3.6 Park and Ride Facilities: Encourage the provision of regional public transportation services and support facilities such as park and ride lots.

ITEM 2: VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
The residential and commuter VMT under the current General Plan and the proposed General Plan Update for the City are shown in Table 13. As shown in the table, the General Plan Update is not expected to increase VMT per person above the current General Plan/No Project conditions. In fact, home-based VMT per resident, work-based VMT per employee, and total VMT per service population are all expected to decrease under the proposed General Plan Update. Part of this reduction could be attributed to the increasingly balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities within the City with the proposed land uses. The mix of residential and employment opportunities should help to reduce the prevalence of long-distance “super-commutes” for San Jacinto residents, resulting in the reduction in VMT observed in Table 13. Since the boundaries of Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) from the SCAG model are not aligned with the City boundary, the residents and employees presented in Table 13 are the sum of land uses of TAZs that are completely within the City boundary and TAZs that have majority part within the City boundary. Therefore, the population and jobs numbers are slightly higher than what the proposed General Plan would include strictly within City boundaries. The only land use changes made within the model were those included in the proposed General Plan Update previously described.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3659 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Kirby St
Ramona Expy
Soboba Rd
Mountain Ave
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Palm
Washington Ave
Cottonwood Ave
Esplanade Ave
Soboba Rd
State St
Menlo Ave
Hewitt St
Park Ave
Ramona Expy
Main St
Commonwealth Ave
Lyon Ave
Cawston Ave
de Anza Dr
7th St
Ramona Blvd
Camino los Banos
7th St
Record Rd
Odell Ave
Sanderson Ave
Deegan St
Young St
Potter Rd
Warren Rd
Ramona Expy
Lake Park Dr
UV79
Palm
Ave
Columbia St
Kirby St
Gilman Springs Rd
State St
Lyon Ave
Sanderson Ave
Oakland Ave
UV79
UV79
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r r r
r
r
r
r
rr
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
rr
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
rr
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r r r r r r r r r r r
"J
"J
"J
"J
"J
"J
"J

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
GENERAL PLAN 2040
Figure 11.

TMP Proposed Trails
and Bicycle Facilities
Legend
Neighboring City
Waterbodies
City Park
San Jacinto Sphere of Influence
City of San Jacinto
"J TMP Proposed Trailhead
Proposed Bicycle Improvements
Class I: Multi-use Path
r Class IE: Multi-use & Equestrian Path
Class II: Bike Lane/Buffered Bike Lane
Class III: Bike Route
Future Opportunity
Existing Bikeways
Class 1: Multi-Use Path
Class 2: Bike Lane
Class 2B: Buffered Bike Lane
Class 3: Bike Route

H E M E T

B E A U M O N T
0 P0.5 1
Miles
San Jacinto River
San Jacinto
River
Sources: City of San Jacinto; Riverside County.

Map date: January 25, 2019.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3660 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Transportation Impact Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 56
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Table 13: Cumulative (2040) VMT Comparison
Statistic Current General
Plan
Proposed General
Plan Update
Change in VMT per
Resident/Employee
Home-Based VMT
Home-Based Trip VMT 1,654,355 2,113,203
-6.1% Total Residents 90,455 123,092
Home-Based VMT per
Resident

18.29 17.17
Work-Based VMT
Work-Based Trip VMT 282,128 320,321
-12.6% Total Employees 22,827 29,670
Work-Based VMT per
Employee

12.36 10.80
Total VMT
Total VMT 3,224,883 3,830,656
-11.9% Total Service Population 113,282 152,762
Total VMT per Service
Population

28.47 25.08
Source: Kittelson, 2021.

As shown in Table 13, the proposed General Plan update is not expected to increase VMT per person above No Project conditions. Therefore, the VMT-related impacts of the Plan Update would be considered less than significant.

ITEM 3: GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND INCOMPATIBLE

USE HAZARDS
The types of uses included within the city of San Jacinto as part of the Plan are generally similar to existing and surrounding uses and thereby are compatible with the existing uses in the Plan area and in the surrounding area.

In addition, the mobility element developed as part of the General Plan update contains policies in support of roadway network safety and reducing design hazards, including:
• M-1.1 Balanced Circulation System. Provide for a balanced circulation system that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City. • M-1.5 Transportation Improvements for All Users: Encourage roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
• M-1.6 ADA Accessibility: Manage and improve the City's transportation network to be safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to allow mobility-impaired users to safely travel within and beyond the City.
• M-1.7 Safe Routes to Schools: Work with the San Jacinto Unified School District and Hemet Unified School District in the City to maintain Safe Routes to School and encourage parents and children to walk or bike to schools.
• M-1.8 Traffic Calming: Encourage programming and design strategies to maintain safe vehicular speeds on roadways, including traffic calming measures, where applicable. • M-3.1 Complete Streets: Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users of all ages and abilities.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3661 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Transportation Impact Analysis October 7, 2021 Page 57
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Therefore, the impact of the Plan with respect to design and incompatible use hazards would be considered less than significant.

ITEM 4: EMERGENCY ACCESS
The Plan is a programmatic level document; emergency accessibility is typically assessed at the project level. In addition, the mobility element developed as part of the General Plan update contains policies in support of emergency access along local roads, including:
• M-1.2 Access and Mobility: Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.
• M-2.1 Regional Agency Coordination: Coordinate with regional transportation agencies, including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) to implement roadway improvements that promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic within and beyond the City—for example State Route 79 (SR 79) and Mid County Parkway.
• M-2.5 Freeway Coordination: Work with regional and State transportation agencies to minimize the impacts of regional roadways construction (e.g., SR 79) on local businesses and employment centers.

Therefore, the impact of the Plan with respect to emergency access would be considered less than significant.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3662 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Conclusions and Recommendations

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3663 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto GPU Update Transportation Impact Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations October 7, 2021 Page 59
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SIGNIFICANT TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA transportation impact analysis of the Plan found no significant impacts for the following topics:
• Conflict with Applicable Plans and Policies
• Vehicle Miles Traveled
• Design and Incompatible Use Safety Hazards
• Emergency Access

ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
In addition to the transportation analysis conducted under CEQA requirements, roadway segment and intersection operations with Plan implementation were analyzed to address the City’s goal of providing satisfactory roadway operations and traffic flow within San Jacinto. Recommended improvements on these facilities were provided to accommodate long-term buildout of vehicular traffic. It is recommended that the City continue to monitor traffic volumes on these and other roadway facilities to determine the timing and extent of any improvements as development projects are implemented in the City.

The roadway segments with recommended improvements are:
• Ramona Expressway, east of State Street
• State Street, south of Ramona Expressway
The intersections with recommended improvements are:
• Warren Road and Esplanade Avenue
• Lyon Avenue and Ramona Expressway
• Lyon Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue
• Lyon Avenue and 7th Street
• State Street & Community College Drive
• State Street and Ramona Expressway
• Cawston Avenue and Esplanade Avenue
• Lyon Avenue and Ramona Boulevard

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3664 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix A
Existing Traffic Count Data

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3665 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3666 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Ramona Expy W/O Warren Rd
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_001
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 11,004 11,625 22,629
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 37 23 60 12:00 107 126 233
00:15 49 16 65 12:15 93 103 196
00:30 28 28 56 12:30 117 147 264
00:45 38 152 20 87 58 239 12:45 117 434 173 549 290 983 01:00 27 17 44 13:00 107 143 250
01:15 27 21 48 13:15 126 201 327
01:30 21 23 44 13:30 160 174 334
01:45 20 95 25 86 45 181 13:45 173 566 165 683 338 1249 02:00 27 22 49 14:00 178 157 335
02:15 16 24 40 14:15 206 144 350
02:30 10 25 35 14:30 180 152 332
02:45 25 78 29 100 54 178 14:45 233 797 166 619 399 1416 03:00 18 31 49 15:00 234 143 377
03:15 28 62 90 15:15 208 205 413
03:30 26 80 106 15:30 231 186 417
03:45 51 123 111 284 162 407 15:45 248 921 202 736 450 1657 04:00 36 126 162 16:00 265 204 469
04:15 41 183 224 16:15 247 193 440
04:30 54 203 257 16:30 213 166 379
04:45 105 236 126 638 231 874 16:45 268 993 197 760 465 1753 05:00 92 177 269 17:00 299 180 479
05:15 88 232 320 17:15 234 204 438
05:30 114 231 345 17:30 190 175 365
05:45 112 406 169 809 281 1215 17:45 184 907 173 732 357 1639 06:00 95 185 280 18:00 168 147 315
06:15 131 192 323 18:15 199 128 327
06:30 141 272 413 18:30 181 116 297
06:45 122 489 267 916 389 1405 18:45 137 685 83 474 220 1159 07:00 148 245 393 19:00 130 91 221
07:15 154 283 437 19:15 137 94 231
07:30 145 276 421 19:30 123 97 220
07:45 173 620 172 976 345 1596 19:45 98 488 83 365 181 853 08:00 148 177 325 20:00 105 76 181
08:15 149 162 311 20:15 103 76 179
08:30 126 158 284 20:30 89 66 155
08:45 117 540 136 633 253 1173 20:45 86 383 77 295 163 678 09:00 114 128 242 21:00 94 61 155
09:15 96 111 207 21:15 55 55 110
09:30 116 102 218 21:30 76 54 130
09:45 108 434 99 440 207 874 21:45 76 301 38 208 114 509 10:00 103 108 211 22:00 54 52 106
10:15 105 102 207 22:15 73 82 155
10:30 88 130 218 22:30 49 49 98
10:45 99 395 120 460 219 855 22:45 117 293 35 218 152 511 11:00 110 109 219 23:00 92 33 125
11:15 99 116 215 23:15 67 31 98
11:30 90 111 201 23:30 50 24 74
11:45 114 413 102 438 216 851 23:45 46 255 31 119 77 374 TOTALS 3981 5867 9848 TOTALS 7023 5758 12781
SPLIT % 40.4% 59.6% 43.5% SPLIT % 54.9% 45.1% 56.5%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 11,004 11,625 22,629
AM Peak Hour 07:00 06:45 06:45 PM Peak Hour 16:15 15:15 15:30 AM Pk Volume 620 1071 1640 PM Pk Volume 1027 797 1776
Pk Hr Factor 0.896 0.946 0.938 Pk Hr Factor 0.859 0.972 0.947 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1160 1609 2769 4 - 6 Volume 0 0 1900 1492 3392 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 4 - 6 Peak Hour 16:15 16:00 16:15 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 620 976 1596 4 - 6 Pk Volume 0 0 1027 760 1763 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.896 0.862 0.913 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.859 0.931 0.920

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3667 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_001 City: San Jacinto
Location: Ramona Expy W/O Warren Rd Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3668 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_002n
North Bound
Time#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9# 10# 11# 12# 13 Total
00:00 AM02000000000002
00:1504000000100005
00:300820000020000 12
00:4502000000100003
01:0006000000000006
01:1504101000000006
01:3006100000200009
01:4502102001000006
02:0012111000100007
02:1501201000100005
02:3006100000000007
02:4502201002100008
03:000920100000000 12
03:150 1040000000000 14
03:300 1830200110000 25
03:450 2450300010000 33
04:000 22 120100010000 36
04:151 3380300000000 45
04:300 3790400100100 52
04:450 31 172700000000 57
05:000 49 210700120000 80
05:150 57 170800010000 83
05:300 51 261800110000 88
05:450 48 260610120100 85
06:000 60 361800210000 108
06:150 79 321910010000 123
06:300 105 391 1800010000 164
06:450 94 323700110000 138
07:000 123 270700100100 159
07:151 111 221710120100 147
07:300 99 261910100300 140
07:451 91 241512010100 127
08:000 107 271 1200120100 151
08:150 76 111710010000 97
08:300 85 200320130100 115
08:450 71 240 1000030000 108
09:000 48 134600150100 78
09:150 68 191800010000 97
09:301 56 170100120000 78
09:451 58 160400110000 81
10:000 55 180200030000 78
10:150 40 140900110000 65
10:300 44 180620000000 70
10:451 59 141800110000 85
11:001 4270310010000 55
11:150 44 191400040000 72
11:300 39 101600010000 57
11:450 35 231820130000 73
12:00 PM0 55 130720010000 78
12:150 41 130410200000 61
12:300 54 161610020000 80
12:451 55 200730100000 87
13:000 40 121410220000 62
13:150 65 140520120000 89
13:300 52 170310100000 74
13:451 55 292210000000 90
14:001 51 172300030000 77
14:150 49 210500100000 76
14:301 76 201600200100 107
14:450 57 230 1000100100 92
15:000 59 200 1000120000 92
15:150 54 250630010000 89
15:300 78 210600120000 108
15:450 70 251300010100 101
16:000 62 280400040000 98
16:150 63 190500000000 87
16:300 68 211300010000 94
16:451 73 290700120000 113
17:002 69 171710100000 98
17:150 68 150700010000 91
17:300 74 240810110000 109
17:450 63 190600100000 89
18:001 46 130200000000 62
18:150 61 170300020000 83
18:300 39 151200020000 59
18:450 3880000000000 46
19:000 3721000020000 42
19:150 36 111000210000 51
19:300 3371100010000 43
19:450 2240310100000 31
20:003 2250010010000 32
20:150 2120200000000 25
20:300 2040000000000 24
20:450 2650300010000 35
21:000 1940100000000 24
21:150 1530000000000 18
21:300 1451300300000 26
21:450 1410000000000 15
22:000 1230100000000 16
22:151 1930100000000 24
22:301 1030010010000 16
22:450 1430000010000 18
23:000720000020000 11
23:150 1510000000000 16
23:300 1310000000000 14
23:4506300000000009
Totals 21 4133 1272 39 379 33
2 45 96 14 6034
% of Totals 0% 68% 21% 1% 6% 1% 0% 1% 2% 0% 100%
AM Volumes
8 2123 669 24 223 132 22 570 1100 3152
% AM 0% 35% 11% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 52%
AM Peak Hour 07:00 06:30 06:00 06:00 06:00 11:45 07:00 05:15 08:15 07:00 06:30 Volume
2 433 1396 42624 126 608
PM Volumes 13 2010 603 15 156 20
0 23 390300 2882
% PM 0% 33% 10% 0% 3% 0% 0% 1% 0% 48%
PM Peak Hour 13:45 16:45 15:15 13:45 14:30 12:00 12:15 15:15 14:00 16:45 Volume
3 284 995 327582 411
Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume
% Volume% Volume% Volume%
1044 17% 621 10% 779 13% 3590 59%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles4 Buses7> =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units6 3-Axle Single Units9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3669 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_002s
South Bound
Time#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9# 10# 11# 12# 13 Total
00:00 AM0 1300000000000 13
00:150 1730100010000 22
00:3007200000000009
00:4504301000000008
01:000920000000000 11
01:1502101000000004
01:3007100000100009
01:450 1030000000000 13
02:0008000000000008
02:1505300000000008
02:3002100000000003
02:4509000000000009
03:0005100001200009
03:1504310000000008
03:300720100000000 10
03:450 1060100010000 18
04:000 1140100100000 17
04:150 1760100030000 27
04:300 14 100000010000 25
04:450 20 120000020000 34
05:000 2570500020000 39
05:150 2280500100100 37
05:300 31 170500100000 54
05:451 35 150200010000 54
06:000 26 100300030000 42
06:150 31 140900010100 56
06:300 44 190820011000 75
06:450 31 190600000100 57
07:000 50 140700010000 72
07:151 43 200600040000 74
07:300 58 160700000000 81
07:450 55 140500010000 75
08:000 46 160800000000 70
08:151 62 171700000000 88
08:300 42 160610000000 65
08:450 29 161300040000 53
09:000 38 151401300000 62
09:150 33 120500000000 50
09:300 33 192800000000 62
09:450 45 120200100100 61
10:000 35 110601020000 55
10:150 27 101600130000 48
10:301 3990400030000 56
10:450 44 110310010000 60
11:000 45 101 1020100000 69
11:150 48 120700100000 68
11:300 28 180510100000 53
11:450 47 130221030000 68
12:00 PM1 29 130410000100 49
12:151 37 160810020000 65
12:300 52 130210031000 72
12:450 56 140700020000 79
13:000 39 151310010100 61
13:150 46 180 1010020000 77
13:301 58 260600100100 93
13:450 57 220700120100 90
14:000 59 211610110100 91
14:150 63 180 1000121000 95
14:300 62 130900000100 85
14:450 75 250510100000 107
15:000 72 311710001100 114
15:151 81 331930030000 131
15:300 93 250810110200 131
15:451 89 280 1110140000 135
16:000 101 400 1300021000 157
16:150 95 400 1000120000 148
16:301 98 191601110000 128
16:450 111 292700120000 152
17:000 102 433600200000 156
17:151 105 280700020000 143
17:300 100 250300000000 128
17:450 91 130400000100 109
18:001 84 250100200000 113
18:151 83 271600010000 119
18:300 76 120800001000 97
18:450 87 160200010000 106
19:000 51 180500000100 75
19:150 48 130310000000 65
19:300 37 150202010000 57
19:451 3110201010000 37
20:000 35 110100000000 47
20:151 34 120000000000 47
20:300 3480400000100 47
20:450 3760100010000 45
21:000 37 120200000000 51
21:150 1460000000000 20
21:300 3280000000000 40
21:450 3080200100000 41
22:000 1561201000000 25
22:150 2340100100000 29
22:300 1110100010000 14
22:450 2970000000000 36
23:000 1820000000000 20
23:150 1721000000000 20
23:300900000010000 10
23:450 1611000000000 18
Totals 15 3932 1242 22 372 23
8 28 806 16 5744
% of Totals 0% 68% 22% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes
4 1273 4538 16193 12 411400 1969
% AM 0% 22% 8% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 34%
AM Peak Hour 11:30 07:30 06:30 08:45 06:15 11:00 08:15 09:00 10:00 05:45 06:00 07:30 Volume
2 221 724 30514912 314
PM Volumes 11 2659 789 14 211 14
5 16 395 1200 3775
% PM 0% 46% 14% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 66%
PM Peak Hour 12:00 16:45 15:30 16:15 15:30 14:45 19:00 16:15 15:15 14:15 13:00 16:00 Volume
2 418 1336 42635 1023 585
Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume
% Volume% Volume% Volume%
578 10% 586 10% 1121 20% 3459 60%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles4 Buses7> =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units6 3-Axle Single Units9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3670 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_002
Summary
Time#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9# 10# 11# 12# 13 Total
00:00 AM0 1500000000000 15
00:150 2130100020000 27
00:300 1540000020000 21
00:450630100010000 11
01:000 1520000000000 17
01:150620200000000 10
01:300 1320000030000 18
01:450 1240200100000 19
02:001 1011100010000 15
02:150650100010000 13
02:300820000000000 10
02:450 1120100210000 17
03:000 1430100120000 21
03:150 1471000000000 22
03:300 2550300110000 35
03:450 34 110400020000 51
04:000 33 160200110000 53
04:151 50 140400030000 72
04:300 51 190400110100 77
04:450 51 292700020000 91
05:000 74 280 1200140000 119
05:150 79 250 1300110100 120
05:300 82 431 1300210000 142
05:451 83 410810130100 139
06:000 86 461 1100240000 150
06:150 110 461 1810020100 179
06:300 149 581 2620021000 239
06:450 125 513 1300110100 195
07:000 173 410 1400110100 231
07:152 154 421 1310160100 221
07:300 157 421 1610100300 221
07:451 146 381 1012020100 202
08:000 153 431 2000120100 221
08:151 138 282 1410010000 185
08:300 127 360930130100 180
08:450 100 401 1300070000 161
09:000 86 285 1001450100 140
09:150 101 311 1300010000 147
09:301 89 362900120000 140
09:451 103 280600210100 142
10:000 90 290801050000 133
10:150 67 241 1500240000 113
10:301 83 270 1020030000 126
10:451 103 251 1110120000 145
11:001 87 171 1330110000 124
11:150 92 311 1100140000 140
11:300 67 281 1110110000 110
11:450 82 361 1041160000 141
12:00 PM1 84 260 1130010100 127
12:151 78 290 1220220000 126
12:300 106 291820051000 152
12:451 111 340 1430120000 166
13:000 79 272720230100 123
13:150 111 320 1530140000 166
13:301 110 430910200100 167
13:451 112 512910120100 180
14:001 110 383910140100 168
14:150 112 390 1500221000 171
14:301 138 331 1500200200 192
14:450 132 480 1510200100 199
15:000 131 511 1710121100 206
15:151 135 581 1560040000 220
15:300 171 460 1410230200 239
15:451 159 531 1410150100 236
16:000 163 680 1700061000 255
16:150 158 590 1500120000 235
16:301 166 402901120000 222
16:451 184 582 1400240000 265
17:002 171 604 1310300000 254
17:151 173 430 1400030000 234
17:300 174 490 1110110000 237
17:450 154 320 1000100100 198
18:002 130 380300200000 175
18:151 144 441900030000 202
18:300 115 271 1000021000 156
18:450 125 240200010000 152
19:000 88 201500020100 117
19:150 84 241310210000 116
19:300 70 221302020000 100
19:451 5350511110000 68
20:003 57 160110010000 79
20:151 55 140200000000 72
20:300 54 120400000100 71
20:450 63 110400020000 80
21:000 56 160300000000 75
21:150 2990000000000 38
21:300 46 131300300000 66
21:450 4490200100000 56
22:000 2791301000000 41
22:151 4270200100000 53
22:301 2140110020000 30
22:450 43 100000010000 54
23:000 2540000020000 31
23:150 3231000000000 36
23:300 2210000010000 24
23:450 2241000000000 27
Totals 36 8065 2514 61 751 56 10 73 176
6 30 11778
% of Totals 0% 68% 21% 1% 6% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes 12 3396 1122 32 384 22
5 34 981 1500 5121
% AM 0% 29% 10% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 43%
AM Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 06:00 08:45 06:15 11:45 07:00 09:00 08:15 05:45 06:45 06:30 Volume
3 630 2019 71 1127 1616 886
PM Volumes 24 4669 1392 29 367 34
5 39 785 1500 6657
% PM 0% 40% 12% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 57%
PM Peak Hour 16:30 16:45 15:30 16:15 14:15 12:00 19:00 14:00 15:15 14:15 13:45 16:45 Volume
5 702 2268 62 1037 1824 990
Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume
% Volume% Volume% Volume%
1622 14% 1207 10% 1900 16% 7049 60%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles4 Buses7> =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units6 3-Axle Single Units9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3671 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_002n
North Bound
Time # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 Total 00:00 AM 0 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 22
01:00 0 18 3 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 27
02:00 1 11 6 1 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 27
03:00 0 61 14 0 6 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 84
04:00 1 123 46 2 15 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 190
05:00 0 205 90 1 29 1 0 3 6 0 1 0 0 336
06:00 0 338 139 6 42 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 533
07:00 2 424 99 3 28 3 2 3 3 0 6 0 0 573
08:00 0 339 82 2 32 3 0 2 9 0 2 0 0 471
09:00 2 230 65 5 19 0 0 3 9 0 1 0 0 334
10:00 1 198 64 1 25 2 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 298
11:00 1 160 59 3 21 3 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 257
12:00 PM 1 205 62 1 24 7 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 306
13:00 1 212 72 3 14 5 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 315
14:00 2 233 81 3 24 0 0 4 3 0 2 0 0 352
15:00 0 261 91 1 25 3 0 2 6 0 1 0 0 390
16:00 1 266 97 1 19 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 392
17:00 2 274 75 1 28 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 387
18:00 1 184 53 1 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 250
19:00 0 128 24 3 4 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 167
20:00 3 89 16 0 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 116
21:00 0 62 13 1 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 83
22:00 2 55 12 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 74
23:00 0 41 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 50
Totals 21 4133 1272 39 379 33 2 45 96 14 6034
% of Totals 0% 68% 21% 1% 6% 1% 0% 1% 2% 0% 100%
AM Volumes 8 2123 669 24 223 13 2 22 57 0 11 0 0 3152
% AM 0% 35% 11% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 52%
AM Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 05:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 Volume 2 424 139 6 42 3 2 3 9 6 573
PM Volumes 13 2010 603 15 156 20 0 23 39 0 3 0 0 2882
% PM 0% 33% 10% 0% 3% 0% 0% 1% 0% 48%
PM Peak Hour 20:00 17:00 16:00 13:00 17:00 12:00 13:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 Volume 3 274 97 3 28 7 4 7 2 392
Directional Factor % #REF! Peak Volume for direction 573 Directional Peak Hr. for Day 07:00 Peak Hr % 9.50 Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
1044 17% 621 10% 779 13% 3590 59%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles 4 Buses 7 > =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars 5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units 8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units 6 3-Axle Single Units 9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3672 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_002s
South Bound
Time # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 Total 00:00 AM 0 41 8 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 52
01:00 0 28 7 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 37
02:00 0 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
03:00 0 26 12 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 45
04:00 0 62 32 0 2 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 103
05:00 1 113 47 0 17 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 184
06:00 0 132 62 0 26 2 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 230
07:00 1 206 64 0 25 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 302
08:00 1 179 65 2 24 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 276
09:00 0 149 58 3 19 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 235
10:00 1 145 41 1 19 1 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 219
11:00 0 168 53 1 24 5 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 258
12:00 PM 2 174 56 0 21 3 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 265
13:00 1 200 81 1 26 2 0 2 5 0 3 0 0 321
14:00 0 259 77 1 30 2 0 3 3 1 2 0 0 378
15:00 2 335 117 2 35 6 0 2 8 1 3 0 0 511
16:00 1 405 128 3 36 0 1 3 7 1 0 0 0 585
17:00 1 398 109 3 20 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 536
18:00 2 330 80 1 17 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 435
19:00 1 167 47 0 12 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 234
20:00 1 140 37 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 186
21:00 0 113 34 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 152
22:00 0 78 18 1 4 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 104
23:00 0 60 5 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 68
Totals 15 3932 1242 22 372 23 8 28 80 6 16 5744
% of Totals 0% 68% 22% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes 4 1273 453 8 161 9 3 12 41 1 4 0 0 1969
% AM 0% 22% 8% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 34%
AM Peak Hour 05:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 06:00 11:00 09:00 09:00 10:00 06:00 06:00 07:00 Volume 1 206 65 3 26 5 1 4 9 1 2 302
PM Volumes 11 2659 789 14 211 14 5 16 39 5 12 0 0 3775
% PM 0% 46% 14% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 66%
PM Peak Hour 12:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 15:00 19:00 14:00 15:00 12:00 13:00 16:00 Volume 2 405 128 3 36 6 3 3 8 1 3 585
Directional Factor % #REF! Peak Volume for direction 585 Directional Peak Hr. for Day 16:00 Peak Hr % 10.18 Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
578 10% 586 10% 1121 20% 3459 60%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles 4 Buses 7 > =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars 5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units 8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units 6 3-Axle Single Units 9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3673 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_002
Summary
Time # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 Total 00:00 AM 0 57 10 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 74
01:00 0 46 10 0 4 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 64
02:00 1 35 10 1 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 55
03:00 0 87 26 1 8 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 129
04:00 1 185 78 2 17 0 0 2 7 0 1 0 0 293
05:00 1 318 137 1 46 1 0 5 9 0 2 0 0 520
06:00 0 470 201 6 68 3 0 3 9 1 2 0 0 763
07:00 3 630 163 3 53 3 2 3 9 0 6 0 0 875
08:00 1 518 147 4 56 4 0 2 13 0 2 0 0 747
09:00 2 379 123 8 38 0 1 7 9 0 2 0 0 569
10:00 2 343 105 2 44 3 1 3 14 0 0 0 0 517
11:00 1 328 112 4 45 8 1 4 12 0 0 0 0 515
12:00 PM 3 379 118 1 45 10 0 3 10 1 1 0 0 571
13:00 2 412 153 4 40 7 0 6 9 0 3 0 0 636
14:00 2 492 158 4 54 2 0 7 6 1 4 0 0 730
15:00 2 596 208 3 60 9 0 4 14 1 4 0 0 901
16:00 2 671 225 4 55 0 1 4 14 1 0 0 0 977
17:00 3 672 184 4 48 2 0 5 4 0 1 0 0 923
18:00 3 514 133 2 24 0 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 685
19:00 1 295 71 3 16 2 3 3 6 0 1 0 0 401
20:00 4 229 53 0 11 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 302
21:00 0 175 47 1 8 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 235
22:00 2 133 30 1 6 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 178
23:00 0 101 12 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 118
Totals 36 8065 2514 61 751 56 10 73 176 6 30 11778
% of Totals 0% 68% 21% 1% 6% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes 12 3396 1122 32 384 22 5 34 98 1 15 0 0 5121 % AM 0% 29% 10% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 43%
AM Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 06:00 09:00 06:00 11:00 07:00 09:00 10:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 Volume 3 630 201 8 68 8 2 7 14 1 6 875
PM Volumes 24 4669 1392 29 367 34 5 39 78 5 15 0 0 6657 % PM 0% 40% 12% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 57%
PM Peak Hour 20:00 17:00 16:00 13:00 15:00 12:00 19:00 14:00 15:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 Volume 4 672 225 4 60 10 3 7 14 1 4 977
Directional Factor % #REF! Peak Volume for direction 977 Directional Peak Hr. for Day 16:00 Peak Hr % 8.30 Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
1622 14% 1207 10% 1900 16% 7049 60%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles 4 Buses 7 > =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars 5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units 8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units 6 3-Axle Single Units 9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3674 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by NDS/ATD
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
6,034 5,74400 11,778
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:002 1300 15 12:00 78 4900 127
00:155 2200 27 12:15 61 6500 126
00:30 12900 21 12:30 80 7200 152
00:453 228 5200 11 74 12:45 87 306 79 26500 166
01:006 1100 17 13:00 62 6100 123
01:156400 10 13:15 89 7700 166
01:309900 18 13:30 74 9300 167
01:456 27 13 3700 19 64 13:45 90 315 90 32100 180
02:007800 15 14:00 77 9100 168
02:155800 13 14:15 76 9500 171
02:307300 10 14:30 107 8500 192
02:458 279 2800 17 55 14:45 92 352 107 37800 199
03:00 12900 21 15:00 92 11400 206
03:15 14800 22 15:15 89 13100 220
03:30 25 1000 35 15:30 108 13100 239
03:45 33 84 18 4500 51 129 15:45 101 390 135 51100 236
04:00 36 1700 53 16:00 98 15700 255
04:15 45 2700 72 16:15 87 14800 235
04:30 52 2500 77 16:30 94 12800 222
04:45 57 190 34 10300 91 293 16:45 113 392 152 58500 265 05:00 80 3900 119 17:00 98 15600 254
05:15 83 3700 120 17:15 91 14300 234
05:30 88 5400 142 17:30 109 12800 237
05:45 85 336 54 18400 139 520 17:45 89 387 109 53600 198 06:00 108 4200 150 18:00 62 11300 175
06:15 123 5600 179 18:15 83 11900 202
06:30 164 7500 239 18:30 59 9700 156
06:45 138 533 57 23000 195 763 18:45 46 250 106 43500 152 07:00 159 7200 231 19:00 42 7500 117
07:15 147 7400 221 19:15 51 6500 116
07:30 140 8100 221 19:30 43 5700 100
07:45 127 573 75 30200 202 875 19:45 31 167 37 23400 68 08:00 151 7000 221 20:00 32 4700 79
08:15 97 8800 185 20:15 25 4700 72
08:30 115 6500 180 20:30 24 4700 71
08:45 108 471 53 27600 161 747 20:45 35 116 45 18600 80 09:00 78 6200 140 21:00 24 5100 75
09:15 97 5000 147 21:15 18 2000 38
09:30 78 6200 140 21:30 26 4000 66
09:45 81 334 61 23500 142 569 21:45 15 83 41 15200 56
10:00 78 5500 133 22:00 16 2500 41
10:15 65 4800 113 22:15 24 2900 53
10:30 70 5600 126 22:30 16 1400 30
10:45 85 298 60 21900 145 517 22:45 18 74 36 10400 54
11:00 55 6900 124 23:00 11 2000 31
11:15 72 6800 140 23:15 16 2000 36
11:30 57 5300 110 23:30 14 1000 24
11:45 73 257 68 25800 141 515 23:459 50 18 6800 27
TOTALS 3152 1969 5121 TOTALS 2882 3775
SPLIT% 61.6% 38.4% 43.5% SPLIT% 43.3% 56.7%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
6,034 5,74400 11,778
AM Peak Hour 06:30 07:30 06:30 PM Peak Hour 16:45 16:00 AM Pk Volume 608 314 886 PM Pk Volume 411 585
Pk Hr Factor 0.927 0.892 0.927 Pk Hr Factor 0.909 0.932 7 - 9 Volume 1044 578 0 0 1622 4 - 6 Volume 779 1121 00 7-9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:30 07:004-6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:00 7-9 Pk Volume 573 31400 8754-6 Pk Volume 411 58500
Pk Hr Factor 0.901 0.892 0.000 0.000 0.947 Pk Hr Factor 0.909 0.932 0.000 0.000

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3675 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_002 City: San Jacinto
Location: Warren Rd S/O Ramona Expy Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3676 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Warren Rd S/O Esplanade Ave
Day: Tuesday City: Hemet
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_003
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
7,100 6,791 0 0 13,891
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 14 12 26 12:00 84 87 171
00:15 15 14 29 12:15 76 87 163
00:30 9 8 17 12:30 94 95 189
00:45 13 51 10 44 23 95 12:45 100 354 93 362 193 716
01:00 9 8 17 13:00 85 85 170
01:15 9 4 13 13:15 87 80 167
01:30 7 8 15 13:30 95 95 190
01:45 7 32 8 28 15 60 13:45 112 379 113 373 225 752
02:00 6 10 16 14:00 111 89 200
02:15 5 9 14 14:15 104 109 213
02:30 6 11 17 14:30 120 100 220
02:45 8 25 5 35 13 60 14:45 137 472 87 385 224 857
03:00 5 14 19 15:00 110 101 211
03:15 9 25 34 15:15 132 107 239
03:30 7 20 27 15:30 136 126 262
03:45 19 40 39 98 58 138 15:45 146 524 111 445 257 969
04:00 23 34 57 16:00 137 101 238
04:15 24 70 94 16:15 135 119 254
04:30 31 65 96 16:30 131 126 257
04:45 45 123 49 218 94 341 16:45 140 543 131 477 271 1020 05:00 54 57 111 17:00 151 123 274
05:15 68 73 141 17:15 133 114 247
05:30 65 106 171 17:30 143 123 266
05:45 76 263 97 333 173 596 17:45 144 571 100 460 244 1031 06:00 88 119 207 18:00 117 107 224
06:15 117 112 229 18:15 106 117 223
06:30 124 105 229 18:30 99 88 187
06:45 130 459 125 461 255 920 18:45 85 407 100 412 185 819 07:00 141 104 245 19:00 82 76 158
07:15 138 141 279 19:15 89 69 158
07:30 156 111 267 19:30 70 45 115
07:45 127 562 102 458 229 1020 19:45 72 313 43 233 115 546 08:00 102 124 226 20:00 51 46 97
08:15 117 136 253 20:15 57 48 105
08:30 101 115 216 20:30 52 45 97
08:45 100 420 104 479 204 899 20:45 54 214 48 187 102 401 09:00 72 74 146 21:00 39 45 84
09:15 104 97 201 21:15 49 43 92
09:30 89 81 170 21:30 44 37 81
09:45 94 359 86 338 180 697 21:45 27 159 32 157 59 316
10:00 77 76 153 22:00 26 32 58
10:15 78 82 160 22:15 23 25 48
10:30 82 85 167 22:30 24 25 49
10:45 78 315 74 317 152 632 22:45 34 107 30 112 64 219
11:00 79 78 157 23:00 23 20 43
11:15 75 84 159 23:15 19 12 31
11:30 87 88 175 23:30 22 14 36
11:45 90 331 73 323 163 654 23:45 13 77 10 56 23 133
TOTALS 2980 3132 6112 TOTALS 4120 3659 7779
SPLIT % 48.8% 51.2% 44.0% SPLIT % 53.0% 47.0% 56.0%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
7,100 6,791 0 0 13,891
AM Peak Hour 06:45 06:45 06:45 PM Peak Hour 17:00 16:15 16:45 AM Pk Volume 565 481 1046 PM Pk Volume 571 499 1058
Pk Hr Factor 0.905 0.853 0.937 Pk Hr Factor 0.945 0.952 0.965 7 - 9 Volume 982 937 0 0 1919 4 - 6 Volume 1114 937 0 0 2051 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 08:00 07:00 4 - 6 Peak Hour 17:00 16:15 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 562 479 0 0 1020 4 - 6 Pk Volume 571 499 0 0 1058 Pk Hr Factor 0.901 0.881 0.000 0.000 0.914 Pk Hr Factor 0.945 0.952 0.000 0.000 0.965

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3677 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_003 City: Hemet
Location: Warren Rd S/O Esplanade Ave Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3678 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Ramona Expy W/O Sanderson Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_004
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 11,335 12,820 24,155
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 30 26 56 12:00 130 137 267
00:15 40 32 72 12:15 102 125 227
00:30 24 23 47 12:30 117 154 271
00:45 30 124 33 114 63 238 12:45 118 467 144 560 262 1027 01:00 28 23 51 13:00 113 181 294
01:15 22 21 43 13:15 113 190 303
01:30 21 19 40 13:30 171 177 348
01:45 24 95 31 94 55 189 13:45 160 557 174 722 334 1279 02:00 28 34 62 14:00 176 174 350
02:15 14 22 36 14:15 187 167 354
02:30 10 32 42 14:30 198 208 406
02:45 17 69 39 127 56 196 14:45 224 785 192 741 416 1526 03:00 23 44 67 15:00 210 190 400
03:15 25 70 95 15:15 199 206 405
03:30 31 71 102 15:30 209 243 452
03:45 39 118 84 269 123 387 15:45 238 856 242 881 480 1737 04:00 32 124 156 16:00 253 235 488
04:15 39 161 200 16:15 233 253 486
04:30 60 157 217 16:30 201 242 443
04:45 114 245 122 564 236 809 16:45 257 944 218 948 475 1892 05:00 100 153 253 17:00 268 262 530
05:15 109 208 317 17:15 217 233 450
05:30 129 218 347 17:30 184 196 380
05:45 128 466 172 751 300 1217 17:45 182 851 261 952 443 1803 06:00 136 196 332 18:00 160 220 380
06:15 161 173 334 18:15 180 196 376
06:30 183 236 419 18:30 163 206 369
06:45 182 662 248 853 430 1515 18:45 132 635 129 751 261 1386 07:00 184 239 423 19:00 120 123 243
07:15 198 215 413 19:15 112 136 248
07:30 188 230 418 19:30 122 99 221
07:45 203 773 161 845 364 1618 19:45 96 450 104 462 200 912 08:00 225 176 401 20:00 92 106 198
08:15 175 185 360 20:15 80 91 171
08:30 165 157 322 20:30 86 99 185
08:45 148 713 118 636 266 1349 20:45 77 335 59 355 136 690 09:00 144 130 274 21:00 74 81 155
09:15 135 127 262 21:15 60 60 120
09:30 129 136 265 21:30 66 65 131
09:45 129 537 125 518 254 1055 21:45 58 258 68 274 126 532 10:00 129 122 251 22:00 48 58 106
10:15 131 144 275 22:15 66 59 125
10:30 102 128 230 22:30 40 59 99
10:45 106 468 126 520 232 988 22:45 101 255 46 222 147 477 11:00 109 128 237 23:00 87 34 121
11:15 102 136 238 23:15 59 38 97
11:30 92 129 221 23:30 50 31 81
11:45 132 435 136 529 268 964 23:45 41 237 29 132 70 369 TOTALS 4705 5820 10525 TOTALS 6630 7000 13630
SPLIT % 44.7% 55.3% 43.6% SPLIT % 48.6% 51.4% 56.4%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 11,335 12,820 24,155
AM Peak Hour 07:15 06:30 06:30 PM Peak Hour 16:15 16:15 16:15 AM Pk Volume 814 938 1685 PM Pk Volume 959 975 1934
Pk Hr Factor 0.904 0.946 0.980 Pk Hr Factor 0.895 0.930 0.912 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1486 1481 2967 4 - 6 Volume 0 0 1795 1900 3695 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 4 - 6 Peak Hour 16:15 16:15 16:15 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 814 845 1618 4 - 6 Pk Volume 0 0 959 975 1934 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.904 0.884 0.956 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.895 0.930 0.912

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3679 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_004 City: San Jacinto
Location: Ramona Expy W/O Sanderson Ave Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3680 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Sanderson Ave N/O Ramona Expy
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_005
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
23,676 25,969 0 0 49,645
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 31 93 124 12:00 305 307 612
00:15 48 96 144 12:15 267 277 544
00:30 53 71 124 12:30 280 337 617
00:45 37 169 75 335 112 504 12:45 260 1112 288 1209 548 2321 01:00 35 62 97 13:00 289 329 618
01:15 40 60 100 13:15 268 304 572
01:30 32 54 86 13:30 284 329 613
01:45 37 144 51 227 88 371 13:45 276 1117 390 1352 666 2469 02:00 51 47 98 14:00 311 376 687
02:15 47 57 104 14:15 308 448 756
02:30 73 51 124 14:30 357 494 851
02:45 67 238 53 208 120 446 14:45 324 1300 443 1761 767 3061 03:00 100 41 141 15:00 331 505 836
03:15 112 44 156 15:15 329 511 840
03:30 112 37 149 15:30 328 558 886
03:45 150 474 47 169 197 643 15:45 358 1346 595 2169 953 3515 04:00 202 72 274 16:00 339 554 893
04:15 251 72 323 16:15 331 560 891
04:30 279 77 356 16:30 324 624 948
04:45 305 1037 75 296 380 1333 16:45 342 1336 615 2353 957 3689 05:00 350 103 453 17:00 327 550 877
05:15 427 149 576 17:15 358 592 950
05:30 443 159 602 17:30 300 501 801
05:45 484 1704 189 600 673 2304 17:45 270 1255 528 2171 798 3426 06:00 515 245 760 18:00 215 410 625
06:15 597 199 796 18:15 240 425 665
06:30 552 312 864 18:30 199 411 610
06:45 581 2245 337 1093 918 3338 18:45 166 820 401 1647 567 2467 07:00 537 330 867 19:00 160 478 638
07:15 474 342 816 19:15 140 421 561
07:30 479 341 820 19:30 157 275 432
07:45 470 1960 347 1360 817 3320 19:45 148 605 275 1449 423 2054 08:00 412 328 740 20:00 155 293 448
08:15 432 333 765 20:15 128 239 367
08:30 442 355 797 20:30 125 263 388
08:45 374 1660 272 1288 646 2948 20:45 128 536 214 1009 342 1545 09:00 382 247 629 21:00 104 224 328
09:15 349 248 597 21:15 143 205 348
09:30 315 284 599 21:30 93 191 284
09:45 304 1350 291 1070 595 2420 21:45 83 423 190 810 273 1233 10:00 287 238 525 22:00 82 176 258
10:15 280 282 562 22:15 95 200 295
10:30 308 279 587 22:30 103 178 281
10:45 270 1145 290 1089 560 2234 22:45 93 373 156 710 249 1083 11:00 286 289 575 23:00 79 150 229
11:15 255 281 536 23:15 57 130 187
11:30 264 261 525 23:30 53 98 151
11:45 282 1087 306 1137 588 2224 23:45 51 240 79 457 130 697 TOTALS 13213 8872 22085 TOTALS 10463 17097 27560
SPLIT % 59.8% 40.2% 44.5% SPLIT % 38.0% 62.0% 55.5%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
23,676 25,969 0 0 49,645
AM Peak Hour 06:15 07:45 06:30 PM Peak Hour 15:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 2267 1363 3465 PM Pk Volume 1356 2381 3732 Pk Hr Factor 0.949 0.960 0.944 Pk Hr Factor 0.947 0.954 0.975 7 - 9 Volume 3620 2648 0 0 6268 4 - 6 Volume 2591 4524 0 0 7115 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:45 07:00 4 - 6 Peak Hour 16:30 16:30 16:30 7 - 9 Pk Volume 1960 1363 0 0 3320 4 - 6 Pk Volume 1351 2381 0 0 3732 Pk Hr Factor 0.912 0.960 0.000 0.000 0.957 Pk Hr Factor 0.943 0.954 0.000 0.000 0.975

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3681 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_005 City: San Jacinto
Location: Sanderson Ave N/O Ramona Expy Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3682 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Sanderson Ave S/O Ramona Blvd
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_006
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
11,687 11,828 0 0 23,515
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 23 49 72 12:00 155 143 298
00:15 21 45 66 12:15 143 148 291
00:30 31 40 71 12:30 140 141 281
00:45 24 99 29 163 53 262 12:45 136 574 140 572 276 1146 01:00 23 29 52 13:00 142 139 281
01:15 16 17 33 13:15 154 143 297
01:30 14 15 29 13:30 153 148 301
01:45 22 75 25 86 47 161 13:45 138 587 161 591 299 1178 02:00 21 14 35 14:00 142 161 303
02:15 16 13 29 14:15 186 204 390
02:30 26 17 43 14:30 168 193 361
02:45 30 93 22 66 52 159 14:45 171 667 237 795 408 1462 03:00 55 27 82 15:00 135 226 361
03:15 58 21 79 15:15 168 232 400
03:30 46 23 69 15:30 176 243 419
03:45 79 238 19 90 98 328 15:45 166 645 303 1004 469 1649 04:00 103 30 133 16:00 153 277 430
04:15 146 30 176 16:15 150 262 412
04:30 125 48 173 16:30 151 296 447
04:45 129 503 40 148 169 651 16:45 144 598 298 1133 442 1731 05:00 175 47 222 17:00 134 286 420
05:15 216 42 258 17:15 173 278 451
05:30 222 65 287 17:30 147 290 437
05:45 232 845 75 229 307 1074 17:45 133 587 255 1109 388 1696 06:00 274 86 360 18:00 130 249 379
06:15 275 114 389 18:15 122 233 355
06:30 263 90 353 18:30 94 235 329
06:45 298 1110 135 425 433 1535 18:45 77 423 178 895 255 1318 07:00 262 135 397 19:00 84 153 237
07:15 229 171 400 19:15 90 181 271
07:30 239 136 375 19:30 68 142 210
07:45 227 957 162 604 389 1561 19:45 83 325 131 607 214 932 08:00 198 144 342 20:00 92 123 215
08:15 201 133 334 20:15 77 118 195
08:30 173 142 315 20:30 61 110 171
08:45 183 755 122 541 305 1296 20:45 57 287 108 459 165 746 09:00 163 98 261 21:00 73 77 150
09:15 187 138 325 21:15 72 94 166
09:30 125 133 258 21:30 55 77 132
09:45 141 616 107 476 248 1092 21:45 38 238 83 331 121 569 10:00 131 115 246 22:00 54 82 136
10:15 161 107 268 22:15 53 69 122
10:30 168 128 296 22:30 56 59 115
10:45 132 592 127 477 259 1069 22:45 35 198 68 278 103 476 11:00 148 122 270 23:00 31 70 101
11:15 149 146 295 23:15 24 64 88
11:30 122 115 237 23:30 33 47 80
11:45 137 556 136 519 273 1075 23:45 31 119 49 230 80 349 TOTALS 6439 3824 10263 TOTALS 5248 8004 13252
SPLIT % 62.7% 37.3% 43.6% SPLIT % 39.6% 60.4% 56.4%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
11,687 11,828 0 0 23,515
AM Peak Hour 06:00 07:15 06:45 PM Peak Hour 14:00 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1110 613 1605 PM Pk Volume 667 1158 1760
Pk Hr Factor 0.931 0.896 0.927 Pk Hr Factor 0.897 0.971 0.976 7 - 9 Volume 1712 1145 0 0 2857 4 - 6 Volume 1185 2242 0 0 3427 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:00 4 - 6 Peak Hour 16:30 16:30 16:30 7 - 9 Pk Volume 957 613 0 0 1561 4 - 6 Pk Volume 602 1158 0 0 1760 Pk Hr Factor 0.913 0.896 0.000 0.000 0.976 Pk Hr Factor 0.870 0.971 0.000 0.000 0.976

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3683 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_006 City: San Jacinto
Location: Sanderson Ave S/O Ramona Blvd Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3684 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Sanderson Ave S/O Esplanade Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_007
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
12,789 13,282 0 0 26,071
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 32 34 66 12:00 170 171 341
00:15 22 35 57 12:15 164 184 348
00:30 24 30 54 12:30 178 157 335
00:45 26 104 21 120 47 224 12:45 181 693 194 706 375 1399 01:00 28 32 60 13:00 176 178 354
01:15 17 11 28 13:15 173 176 349
01:30 11 15 26 13:30 173 185 358
01:45 24 80 18 76 42 156 13:45 178 700 191 730 369 1430 02:00 18 21 39 14:00 184 194 378
02:15 16 14 30 14:15 219 214 433
02:30 24 17 41 14:30 218 185 403
02:45 26 84 18 70 44 154 14:45 199 820 221 814 420 1634 03:00 35 21 56 15:00 202 235 437
03:15 36 19 55 15:15 229 242 471
03:30 41 32 73 15:30 193 295 488
03:45 56 168 31 103 87 271 15:45 194 818 307 1079 501 1897 04:00 68 44 112 16:00 197 281 478
04:15 79 50 129 16:15 205 291 496
04:30 92 56 148 16:30 185 279 464
04:45 101 340 49 199 150 539 16:45 201 788 260 1111 461 1899 05:00 131 80 211 17:00 215 301 516
05:15 146 61 207 17:15 179 290 469
05:30 170 95 265 17:30 197 295 492
05:45 185 632 94 330 279 962 17:45 177 768 261 1147 438 1915 06:00 201 99 300 18:00 180 267 447
06:15 222 126 348 18:15 159 211 370
06:30 205 116 321 18:30 140 223 363
06:45 215 843 154 495 369 1338 18:45 148 627 211 912 359 1539 07:00 231 182 413 19:00 138 161 299
07:15 243 214 457 19:15 147 167 314
07:30 242 218 460 19:30 127 151 278
07:45 202 918 175 789 377 1707 19:45 117 529 154 633 271 1162 08:00 201 180 381 20:00 114 128 242
08:15 148 183 331 20:15 93 135 228
08:30 171 158 329 20:30 109 139 248
08:45 170 690 198 719 368 1409 20:45 95 411 89 491 184 902 09:00 166 119 285 21:00 108 107 215
09:15 158 173 331 21:15 103 81 184
09:30 167 173 340 21:30 83 85 168
09:45 136 627 162 627 298 1254 21:45 76 370 80 353 156 723 10:00 168 146 314 22:00 73 83 156
10:15 150 137 287 22:15 97 75 172
10:30 173 171 344 22:30 73 65 138
10:45 152 643 163 617 315 1260 22:45 41 284 59 282 100 566 11:00 179 149 328 23:00 55 68 123
11:15 163 189 352 23:15 39 52 91
11:30 146 161 307 23:30 45 45 90
11:45 191 679 169 668 360 1347 23:45 34 173 46 211 80 384 TOTALS 5808 4813 10621 TOTALS 6981 8469 15450
SPLIT % 54.7% 45.3% 40.7% SPLIT % 45.2% 54.8% 59.3%

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS NB SB EB WB Total
12,789 13,282 0 0 26,071
AM Peak Hour 06:45 07:00 07:00 PM Peak Hour 14:30 15:30 15:30 AM Pk Volume 931 789 1707 PM Pk Volume 848 1174 1963
Pk Hr Factor 0.958 0.905 0.928 Pk Hr Factor 0.926 0.956 0.980 7 - 9 Volume 1608 1508 0 0 3116 4 - 6 Volume 1556 2258 0 0 3814 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 4 - 6 Peak Hour 16:15 17:00 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 918 789 0 0 1707 4 - 6 Pk Volume 806 1147 0 0 1938 Pk Hr Factor 0.944 0.905 0.000 0.000 0.928 Pk Hr Factor 0.937 0.953 0.000 0.000 0.939

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3685 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Prepared by NDS/ATD
Project #: CA19_6064_007 City: San Jacinto
Location: Sanderson Ave S/O Esplanade Ave Date: 5/7/2019 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Vehicles

NB SB EB WB

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3686 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Ramona Expy E/O Lyon Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_008e
East Bound
Time#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9# 10# 11# 12# 13 Total
00:00 AM0 3140000000000 35
00:150 4660100000000 53
00:300 3880000000000 46
00:450 3280000000000 40
01:000 3060000000000 36
01:150 1730000020000 22
01:300 2390400010000 37
01:450 2790200000000 38
02:000 2310200000000 26
02:150 1631100000000 21
02:300 1630000000000 19
02:450 1930000000000 22
03:000 2340100010000 29
03:150 2930000000000 32
03:300 2230000000000 25
03:450 2850100000000 34
04:000 1750100000000 23
04:150 2660200100000 35
04:300 2770000000000 34
04:450 5780400010000 70
05:000 4160010000000 48
05:150 4390000000000 52
05:300 61 100510110000 79
05:450 71 140200100000 88
06:000 65 141410200000 87
06:150 82 170540230000 113
06:300 104 211610120000 136
06:450 185 370 1000120000 235
07:000 156 290610000000 192
07:150 174 331500110000 215
07:300 177 310400000000 212
07:450 197 350600010000 239
08:000 175 300210110000 210
08:150 142 291540000000 181
08:300 127 250 1000000000 162
08:450 152 310600030000 192
09:000 136 291200200000 170
09:150 120 272410010100 156
09:300 113 281600100000 149
09:450 135 231610000000 166
10:001 112 271510110000 149
10:150 115 310110110000 150
10:300 133 261610100100 169
10:450 115 331430010000 157
11:000 120 230200010000 146
11:150 120 270220100000 152
11:300 114 312510220000 157
11:450 125 230500000000 153
12:00 PM0 150 311510010100 190
12:150 118 240400200000 148
12:300 107 200210010100 132
12:450 138 273510020000 176
13:000 119 261100000000 147
13:150 150 320100000000 183
13:300 154 280210000100 186
13:450 156 310100000000 188
14:000 158 310500010000 195
14:150 173 351510000000 215
14:300 212 411110000000 256
14:450 208 480510000000 262
15:000 229 410600110000 278
15:150 208 480600020000 264
15:300 214 441400000000 263
15:450 232 430600100000 282
16:000 255 540510000000 315
16:150 236 440710010000 289
16:300 208 451610000000 261
16:450 237 480500100000 291
17:000 224 480500000000 277
17:150 239 480200000000 289
17:300 211 540400000000 269
17:450 222 520410000000 279
18:000 223 410610110000 273
18:150 212 460100120000 262
18:300 205 410400000000 250
18:450 178 360000000300 217
19:000 166 300200010000 199
19:151 173 320200000000 208
19:300 155 300100010000 187
19:450 120 200200000000 142
20:000 124 250100000000 150
20:150 116 210100100000 139
20:300 121 210000200000 144
20:450 90 180400000000 112
21:000 103 200200000000 125
21:150 97 200200010000 120
21:300 81 140000000000 95
21:450 91 140000010000 106
22:000 80 140000000000 94
22:150 105 191100110000 128
22:300 6270000000000 69
22:450 81 160000000000 97
23:000 91 160000000100 108
23:150 64 140000010000 79
23:300 60 100000020000 72
23:450 4690000010000 56
Totals
2 11359 2280 25 269 37 31 479 14059
% of Totals 0% 81% 16% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes
1 3957 803 15 143 250 20 260200 4992
% AM 0% 28% 6% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 36%
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
1 7402 1477 10 126 120 11 210700 9067
% PM 0% 53% 11% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 64%
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume
% Volume% Volume% Volume%
1603 11% 1350 10% 2270 16% 8836 63%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles4 Buses7> =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units6 3-Axle Single Units9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3687 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Ramona Expy E/O Lyon Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_008w
West Bound
Time#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9# 10# 11# 12# 13 Total
00:00 AM0 1830100000000 22
00:150 2540100000100 31
00:300 2330100000000 27
00:450 1720000000000 19
01:000 1930100010000 24
01:150 1940200000000 25
01:300 2140200000000 27
01:450 1730100010000 22
02:000 2310300000000 27
02:150 2480300000000 35
02:300 4470100000000 52
02:450 2660100010000 34
03:000 5490100000000 64
03:150 62 120310010000 79
03:300 61 160400000000 81
03:450 97 150300000000 115
04:000 118 210300100000 143
04:150 160 340600200000 202
04:300 169 291900100000 209
04:450 138 290400000000 171
05:000 168 330400000000 205
05:150 185 420600000000 233
05:300 196 450500000000 246
05:450 150 350710010000 194
06:000 195 360610010000 239
06:150 206 420600010000 255
06:300 226 340600100000 267
06:450 185 371500010100 230
07:000 235 440800020000 289
07:150 206 350520010000 249
07:300 218 381610200000 266
07:450 150 270500000000 182
08:000 164 321500000000 202
08:150 156 270600110000 191
08:300 154 250500100000 185
08:450 133 231410000000 162
09:000 135 240600000000 165
09:150 124 221420000000 153
09:300 115 180310000000 137
09:450 98 171401010000 122
10:000 115 211610000000 144
10:150 112 220331000000 141
10:300 125 230200000100 151
10:450 111 190301010000 135
11:000 115 270400100000 147
11:150 112 170400100000 134
11:300 117 170510200000 142
11:450 96 171300210000 120
12:00 PM0 137 250510010000 169
12:150 134 261700100000 169
12:300 136 251500100000 168
12:450 141 251510010000 174
13:001 138 240600000000 169
13:150 157 280700000100 193
13:301 134 220330100000 164
13:450 159 280 1000000000 197
14:000 159 302400000000 195
14:150 123 250300200000 153
14:300 148 260400100000 179
14:450 154 290500100000 189
15:000 138 240510100000 169
15:151 198 321600000000 238
15:300 142 240400000100 171
15:450 160 240712000000 194
16:001 171 250600200000 205
16:150 160 320400010000 197
16:300 159 290400000000 192
16:450 136 210300100000 161
17:000 195 350500010000 236
17:150 156 260500100000 188
17:302 128 250302000000 160
17:450 118 210300010000 143
18:000 90 170200000000 109
18:150 115 180300010000 137
18:300 93 140200000000 109
18:450 75 160000100000 92
19:000 85 140100000000 100
19:150 70 151400000000 90
19:300 97 140100000000 112
19:450 88 171300000000 109
20:000 74 140200000100 91
20:150 84 120300000000 99
20:300 81 120200000000 95
20:450 75 110100100000 88
21:000 67 130200000000 82
21:150 5180100000000 60
21:300 5490200000000 65
21:450 4760100000000 54
22:000 5480200000000 64
22:150 70 100100000000 81
22:300 5690200000000 67
22:450 3460100010000 42
23:000 3570300100000 46
23:150 3160100000000 38
23:300 2750100010000 34
23:450 2140100000000 26
Totals
6 10592 1908 17 347 227 30 236 12958
% of Totals 0% 82% 15% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes
0 5437 10129 186 153 15 150300 6695
% AM 42% 8% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52%
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
6 5155 8968 16174 1580300 6263
% PM 0% 40% 7% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 48%
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume
% Volume% Volume% Volume%
1726 13% 1403 11% 1482 11% 8347 64%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles4 Buses7> =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units6 3-Axle Single Units9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3688 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Ramona Expy E/O Lyon Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_008
Summary
Time#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9# 10# 11# 12# 13 Total
00:00 AM0 4970100000000 57
00:150 71 100200000100 84
00:300 61 110100000000 73
00:450 49 100000000000 59
01:000 4990100010000 60
01:150 3670200020000 47
01:300 44 130600010000 64
01:450 44 120300010000 60
02:000 4620500000000 53
02:150 40 111400000000 56
02:300 60 100100000000 71
02:450 4590100010000 56
03:000 77 130200010000 93
03:150 91 150310010000 111
03:300 83 190400000000 106
03:450 125 200400000000 149
04:000 135 260400100000 166
04:150 186 400800300000 237
04:300 196 361900100000 243
04:450 195 370800010000 241
05:000 209 390410000000 253
05:150 228 510600000000 285
05:300 257 550 1010110000 325
05:450 221 490910110000 282
06:000 260 501 1020210000 326
06:150 288 590 1140240000 368
06:300 330 551 1210220000 403
06:450 370 741 1500130100 465
07:000 391 730 1410020000 481
07:150 380 681 1020120000 464
07:300 395 691 1010200000 478
07:450 347 620 1100010000 421
08:000 339 621710110000 412
08:150 298 561 1140110000 372
08:300 281 500 1500100000 347
08:450 285 541 1010030000 354
09:000 271 531800200000 335
09:150 244 493830010100 309
09:300 228 461910100000 286
09:450 233 402 1011010000 288
10:001 227 482 1120110000 293
10:150 227 530441110000 291
10:300 258 491810100200 320
10:450 226 521731020000 292
11:000 235 500600110000 293
11:150 232 440620200000 286
11:300 231 482 1020420000 299
11:450 221 401800210000 273
12:00 PM0 287 561 1020020100 359
12:150 252 501 1100300000 317
12:300 243 451710110100 300
12:450 279 524 1020030000 350
13:001 257 501700000000 316
13:150 307 600800000100 376
13:301 288 500540100100 350
13:450 315 590 1100000000 385
14:000 317 612900010000 390
14:150 296 601810200000 368
14:300 360 671510100000 435
14:450 362 770 1010100000 451
15:000 367 650 1110210000 447
15:151 406 801 1200020000 502
15:300 356 681800000100 434
15:450 392 670 1312100000 476
16:001 426 790 1110200000 520
16:150 396 760 1110020000 486
16:300 367 741 1010000000 453
16:450 373 690800200000 452
17:000 419 830 1000010000 513
17:150 395 740700100000 477
17:302 339 790702000000 429
17:450 340 730710010000 422
18:000 313 580810110000 382
18:150 327 640400130000 399
18:300 298 550600000000 359
18:450 253 520000100300 309
19:000 251 440300010000 299
19:151 243 471600000000 298
19:300 252 440200010000 299
19:450 208 371500000000 251
20:000 198 390300000100 241
20:150 200 330400100000 238
20:300 202 330200200000 239
20:450 165 290500100000 200
21:000 170 330400000000 207
21:150 148 280300010000 180
21:300 135 230200000000 160
21:450 138 200100010000 160
22:000 134 220200000000 158
22:150 175 291200110000 209
22:300 118 160200000000 136
22:450 115 220100010000 139
23:000 126 230300100100 154
23:150 95 200100010000 117
23:300 87 150100030000 106
23:450 67 130100010000 82
Totals
8 21951 4188 42 616 597 61 70 15 27017
% of Totals 0% 81% 16% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes
1 9394 1815 24 329 403 35 410500 11687
% AM 0% 35% 7% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43%
AM Peak Hour 09:15 06:45 06:45 09:15 06:15 10:00 09:30 11:00 06:15 09:45 06:45 Volume
1 1536 2848 52 1029 112 1888
PM Volumes
7 12557 2373 18 287 194 26 290 1000 15330
% PM 0% 46% 9% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57%
PM Peak Hour 12:45 15:45 17:00 12:00 15:45 12:45 15:00 14:15 12:00 18:00 15:45 Volume
2 1581 3097 4562663 1935
Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume
% Volume% Volume% Volume%
3329 12% 2753 10% 3752 14% 17183 64%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles4 Buses7> =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units6 3-Axle Single Units9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3689 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Ramona Expy E/O Lyon Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_008e
East Bound
Time # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 Total 00:00 AM 0 147 26 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174
01:00 0 97 27 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 133
02:00 0 74 10 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88
03:00 0 102 15 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 120
04:00 0 127 26 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 162
05:00 0 216 39 0 7 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 267
06:00 0 436 89 2 25 6 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 571
07:00 0 704 128 1 21 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 858
08:00 0 596 115 1 23 5 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 745
09:00 0 504 107 5 18 2 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 641
10:00 1 475 117 3 16 6 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 625
11:00 0 479 104 2 14 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 608
12:00 PM 0 513 102 4 16 3 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 646
13:00 0 579 117 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 704
14:00 0 751 155 2 16 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 928
15:00 0 883 176 1 22 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1087
16:00 0 936 191 1 23 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1156
17:00 0 896 202 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1114
18:00 0 818 164 0 11 1 0 2 3 0 3 0 0 1002
19:00 1 614 112 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 736
20:00 0 451 85 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 545
21:00 0 372 68 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 446
22:00 0 328 56 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 388
23:00 0 261 49 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 315
Totals 2 11359 2280 25 269 37 31 47 9 14059
% of Totals 0% 81% 16% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes 1 3957 803 15 143 25 0 20 26 0 2 0 0 4992
% AM 0% 28% 6% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 36%
AM Peak Hour 10:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 09:00 07:00 Volume 1 704 128 5 25 6 6 7 1 858
PM Volumes 1 7402 1477 10 126 12 0 11 21 0 7 0 0 9067
% PM 0% 53% 11% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 64%
PM Peak Hour 19:00 16:00 17:00 12:00 16:00 12:00 20:00 12:00 18:00 16:00 Volume 1 936 202 4 23 3 3 4 3 1156
Directional Factor % #REF! Peak Volume for direction 1156 Directional Peak Hr. for Day 16:00 Peak Hr % 8.22 Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
1603 11% 1350 10% 2270 16% 8836 63%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles 4 Buses 7 > =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars 5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units 8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units 6 3-Axle Single Units 9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 3690 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services

CLASSIFICATION
Ramona Expy E/O Lyon Ave
Day: Tuesday City: San Jacinto
Date: 5/7/2019 Project #: CA19_6064_008w
West Bound
Time # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 Total 00:00 AM 0 83 12 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 99
01:00 0 76 14 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 98
02:00 0 117 22 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 148
03:00 0 274 52 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 339
04:00 0 585 113 1 22 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 725
05:00 0 699 155 0 22 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 878
06:00 0 812 149 1 23 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 991
07:00 0 809 144 1 24 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 986
08:00 0 607 107 2 20 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 740
09:00 0 472 81 2 17 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 577
10:00 0 463 85 1 14 4 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 571
11:00 0 440 78 1 16 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 543
12:00 PM 0 548 101 3 22 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 680
13:00 2 588 102 0 26 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 723
14:00 0 584 110 2 16 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 716
15:00 1 638 104 1 22 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 772
16:00 1 626 107 0 17 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 755
17:00 2 597 107 0 16 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 727
18:00 0 373 65 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 447
19:00 0 340 60 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 411
20:00 0 314 49 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 373
21:00 0 219 36 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 261
22:00 0 214 33 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 254
23:00 0 114 22 0 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 144
Totals 6 10592 1908 17 347 22 7 30 23 6 12958
% of Totals 0% 82% 15% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
AM Volumes 0 5437 1012 9 186 15 3 15 15 0 3 0 0 6695
% AM 42% 8% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52%
AM Peak Hour 06:00 05:00 08:00 07:00 10:00 10:00 11:00 06:00 06:00 Volume 812 155 2 24 4 2 6 3 1 991
PM Volumes 6 5155 896 8 161 7 4 15 8 0 3 0 0 6263
% PM 0% 40% 7% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 48%
PM Peak Hour 13:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 15:00 Volume 2 638 110 3 26 3 2 4 2 1 772
Directional Factor % #REF! Peak Volume for direction 991 Directional Peak Hr. for Day 06:00 Peak Hr % 7.65 Directional Peak Periods AM 7-9 NOON 12-2 PM 4-6 Off Peak Volumes All Classes Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
1726 13% 1403 11% 1482 11% 8347 64%
Classification Definitions
1 Motorcycles 4 Buses 7 > =4-Axle Single Units 10 >=6-Axle Single Trailers 13 >=7-Axle Multi-Trailers 2 Passenger Cars 5 2-Axle, 6-Tire Single Units 8 <=4-Axle Single Trailers 11 <=5-Axle Multi-Trailers 3 2-Axle, 4-Tire Single Units 6 3-Axle Single Units 9 5-Axle Single Trailers 12 6-Axle Multi-Trailers

San Jacinto City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

San Jacinto City Council
November 15, 2022