Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 20 of 26)

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 536 128 197 693 2 285 2 362 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 536 128 197 693 2 285 2 362 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1826 1811 1826 1826 1841 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 638 152 235 825 2 339 2 431 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 5 6 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 3 1093 487 292 1920 5 708 3 554 0 657 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.54 0.49 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3469 1547 1725 3550 9 1753 7 1604 0 1900 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 638 152 235 403 424 339 0 433 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1735 1547 1725 1735 1824 1753 0 1611 0 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 10.9 5.3 9.2 9.8 9.8 11.1 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 10.9 5.3 9.2 9.8 9.8 11.1 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1093 487 292 938 987 708 0 557 0 657 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.58 0.31 0.81 0.43 0.43 0.48 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 658 2403 1072 872 1202 1264 1147 0 961 0 1133 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 20.3 18.3 28.2 9.7 9.7 18.7 0.0 21.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.4 2.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 4.2 1.8 3.8 3.3 3.5 4.2 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 20.8 18.7 30.2 10.0 10.0 19.1 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A C B C A A B A C A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 790 1062 772 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.4 14.4 21.5 0.0
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.9 26.2 28.3 0.0 42.1 28.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 7.8 6.0 4.6 7.8 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 45.0 40.0 25.0 45.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.2 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.8 19.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.0 3.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.3
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4156 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Warren Rd & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 30 23 110 15 113 12 451 98 33 249 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 30 23 110 15 113 12 451 98 33 249 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1796 1900 1856 1604 1870 1767 1870 1841 1900 1841 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 33 25 120 16 123 13 490 107 36 271 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 7 0 3 20 2 9 2 4 0 4 0
Cap, veh/h 85 262 235 218 357 352 91 655 546 139 686 600 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1796 1610 1767 1604 1585 1682 1870 1560 1810 1841 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 7 33 25 120 16 123 13 490 107 36 271 2 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1796 1610 1767 1604 1585 1682 1870 1560 1810 1841 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.8 0.7 3.4 0.4 3.4 0.4 12.2 2.5 1.0 5.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.8 0.7 3.4 0.4 3.4 0.4 12.2 2.5 1.0 5.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 85 262 235 218 357 352 91 655 546 139 686 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.13 0.11 0.55 0.04 0.35 0.14 0.75 0.20 0.26 0.40 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 927 1090 977 905 973 962 862 1845 1539 927 1816 1588 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.0 19.6 19.5 21.7 16.1 17.3 23.8 15.1 11.9 22.9 12.2 10.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 0.3 0.2 1.3 0.1 1.1 0.2 4.5 0.8 0.4 2.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.2 19.7 19.6 22.5 16.1 17.5 24.0 15.7 12.0 23.3 12.3 10.4 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 65 259 610 309
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.1 19.7 15.3 13.6
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 22.5 10.5 11.7 6.9 23.6 6.5 15.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 50.0 25.0 30.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 14.2 5.4 2.8 2.4 7.7 2.2 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.0
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4157 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
3: Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh100.5
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 48 40 3 137 36 68 1 443 117 32 321 26 Future Vol, veh/h 48 40 3 137 36 68 1 443 117 32 321 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 1 0 0 100 3 0 3 3 0
Mvmt Flow 53 44 3 152 40 76 1 492 130 36 357 29
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 14.4 19.3 198.1 28.2

HCM LOS B C F D

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 53% 57% 8%
Vol Thru, % 79% 44% 15% 85%
Vol Right, % 21% 3% 28% 7%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 561 91 241 379
LT Vol 1 48 137 32
Through Vol 443 40 36 321
RT Vol 117 3 68 26
Lane Flow Rate 623 101 268 421
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 1.359 0.224 0.526 0.75
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.847 8.854 7.901 7.046
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 468 408 461 518
Service Time 5.854 6.854 5.901 5.046
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.331 0.248 0.581 0.813
HCM Control Delay 198.1 14.4 19.3 28.2
HCM Lane LOS F B C D
HCM 95th-tile Q 28.7 0.8 3 6.4

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4158 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Expy 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 406 307 70 53 438 624 144 996 77 591 608 271 Future Volume (veh/h) 406 307 70 53 438 624 144 996 77 591 608 271 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1870 1885 1870 1870 1885 1856 1870 1900 1826 1856 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 419 316 72 55 452 643 148 1027 79 609 627 279 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 0 5 3 9
Cap, veh/h 454 1362 686 118 1001 739 210 1001 484 661 1469 804 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.38 0.37 0.03 0.28 0.27 0.06 0.28 0.27 0.20 0.42 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 3346 3554 1598 3456 3554 1598 3428 3554 1610 3374 3526 1497 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 419 316 72 55 452 643 148 1027 79 609 627 279 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1673 1777 1598 1728 1777 1598 1714 1777 1610 1687 1763 1497 Q Serve(g_s), s 18.9 9.2 4.1 2.4 16.0 40.7 6.5 43.0 5.5 27.0 19.3 16.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.9 9.2 4.1 2.4 16.0 40.7 6.5 43.0 5.5 27.0 19.3 16.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 454 1362 686 118 1001 739 210 1001 484 661 1469 804 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.23 0.10 0.47 0.45 0.87 0.71 1.03 0.16 0.92 0.43 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 454 1362 686 469 1001 739 465 1001 484 679 1469 804 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 65.2 31.9 26.0 72.3 45.1 36.9 70.3 54.8 39.2 60.2 31.6 20.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 24.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 10.5 1.6 35.2 0.1 17.3 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln9.6 4.0 1.6 1.1 7.2 23.6 2.9 24.1 2.2 13.2 8.3 5.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 89.3 31.9 26.1 73.4 45.2 47.4 71.9 90.0 39.3 77.5 31.7 20.2 LnGrp LOS F C C E D D E F D E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 807 1150 1254 1515
Approach Delay, s/veh 61.2 47.8 84.7 48.0
Approach LOS E D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s33.9 47.0 9.2 62.5 13.3 67.6 24.7 47.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s* 4.7 7.0 * 4.7 7.0 * 4.7 7.0 * 4.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 30 40.0 * 20 40.0 * 20 50.0 * 20 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29.0 45.0 4.4 11.2 8.5 21.3 20.9 42.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.2 3.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 59.9
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4159 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 252 90 80 399 90 83 546 62 28 476 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 252 90 80 399 90 83 546 62 28 476 77 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1900 1870 1900 1870 1885 1900 1856 1826 1841 1856 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 265 95 84 420 95 87 575 65 29 501 81 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 5 4 3 5
Cap, veh/h 280 1035 451 274 529 448 276 1527 668 179 1435 627 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 3610 1572 3510 1870 1584 3510 3526 1542 3401 3526 1542 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 265 95 84 420 95 87 575 65 29 501 81 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1805 1572 1755 1870 1584 1755 1763 1542 1700 1763 1542 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 6.0 4.9 2.4 22.2 4.9 2.5 11.8 2.7 0.9 10.5 3.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 6.0 4.9 2.4 22.2 4.9 2.5 11.8 2.7 0.9 10.5 3.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 280 1035 451 274 529 448 276 1527 668 179 1435 627 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.26 0.21 0.31 0.79 0.21 0.32 0.38 0.10 0.16 0.35 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 834 1429 622 854 740 627 854 1527 668 827 1435 627 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.6 29.3 28.9 46.5 35.4 29.2 46.5 20.5 17.9 48.4 21.9 19.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 2.6 1.9 1.1 10.6 1.9 1.1 4.9 1.0 0.4 4.4 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.0 29.5 29.2 46.8 39.5 29.5 46.8 21.2 18.2 48.5 22.6 20.3 LnGrp LOS D C C D D C D C B D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 475 599 727 611
Approach Delay, s/veh 33.7 38.9 24.0 23.5
Approach LOS C D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.3 34.6 12.4 47.5 12.7 34.2 9.6 50.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 8.0 4.5 12.5 5.4 24.2 2.9 13.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.1 0.1 3.9 0.2 2.6 0.0 4.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.5
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4160 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Sanderson Ave & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 89 32 123 96 51 21 804 80 31 616 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 7 89 32 123 96 51 21 804 80 31 616 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1826 1870 1870 1900 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 93 33 128 100 53 22 838 83 32 642 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 3 3 5 2 2 0 2 0
Cap, veh/h 50 174 62 196 245 130 77 1349 134 96 1503 680 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.20 0.04 0.41 0.37 0.05 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1318 468 1781 1142 605 1739 3261 323 1810 3554 1608 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 7 0 126 128 0 153 22 457 464 32 642 22 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1786 1781 0 1747 1739 1777 1807 1810 1777 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 3.6 3.8 0.0 4.2 0.7 11.2 11.2 0.9 7.0 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 3.6 3.8 0.0 4.2 0.7 11.2 11.2 0.9 7.0 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 50 0 236 196 0 376 77 735 747 96 1503 680 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.00 0.53 0.65 0.00 0.41 0.29 0.62 0.62 0.33 0.43 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 855 0 1330 1165 0 1618 821 1533 1559 1183 3712 1680 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.1 0.0 22.4 23.5 0.0 18.7 25.5 12.7 12.9 25.1 11.2 9.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 1.9 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 0.0 1.5 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.3 3.9 4.0 0.4 2.4 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 24.3 24.9 0.0 19.5 26.2 13.6 13.8 25.8 11.4 9.3 LnGrp LOS C A C C A B C B B C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 133 281 943 696
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.4 21.9 14.0 12.0
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.9 26.8 10.1 11.3 6.4 27.3 5.5 15.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 45.0 35.0 40.0 25.0 55.0 25.0 50.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 13.2 5.8 5.6 2.7 9.0 2.2 6.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 5.2 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4161 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Sanderson Ave & Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 7 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 105 122 25 113 173 35 78 758 80 82 657 59 Future Volume (veh/h) 105 122 25 113 173 35 78 758 80 82 657 59 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1841 1885 1885 1900 1900 1856 1856 1841 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 114 133 27 123 188 38 85 824 87 89 714 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 4 1 1 0 0 3 3 4 3 3
Cap, veh/h 173 300 246 184 314 264 156 1316 139 154 1450 647 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.41 0.38 0.09 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1870 1536 1795 1885 1586 1810 3210 339 1753 3526 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 114 133 27 123 188 38 85 452 459 89 714 64 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1870 1536 1795 1885 1586 1810 1763 1786 1753 1763 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 4.3 1.0 4.4 6.2 1.4 3.0 13.6 13.7 3.3 10.0 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 4.3 1.0 4.4 6.2 1.4 3.0 13.6 13.7 3.3 10.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 173 300 246 184 314 264 156 723 732 154 1450 647 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.44 0.11 0.67 0.60 0.14 0.54 0.63 0.63 0.58 0.49 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 834 869 713 834 875 736 840 1241 1257 814 2482 1107 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.1 25.3 24.0 28.9 25.8 23.8 29.2 15.6 15.8 29.3 14.5 12.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 1.5 0.3 1.6 2.6 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.4 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.8 1.9 0.4 1.9 2.9 0.5 1.3 5.2 5.3 1.4 3.7 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.7 26.8 24.2 30.4 28.4 24.1 30.3 16.9 17.1 30.6 14.9 12.2 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 274 349 996 867
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.2 28.6 18.1 16.3
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.8 31.4 10.8 14.7 9.8 31.5 10.4 15.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 15.7 6.4 6.3 5.0 12.0 6.1 8.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.7 0.1 1.1 0.1 8.4 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.1
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4162 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Lyon Ave/Potter Rd & Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy 07/25/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 8 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 892 85 39 952 4 158 1 80 1 1 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 892 85 39 952 4 158 1 80 1 1 2
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1885 1856 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 418 418 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 959 91 42 1024 4 170 1 86 1 1 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 100 100
Cap, veh/h 10 2529 804 59 2713 855 196 7 596 7 107 95
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.50 0.50 0.03 0.53 0.53 0.11 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 5025 1598 1767 5106 1610 1810 19 1594 1810 397 354 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 959 91 42 1024 4 170 0 87 1 1 2
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1675 1598 1767 1702 1610 1810 0 1613 1810 397 354 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 21.9 5.6 4.4 22.0 0.2 17.3 0.0 6.7 0.1 0.3 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 21.9 5.6 4.4 22.0 0.2 17.3 0.0 6.7 0.1 0.3 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 10 2529 804 59 2713 855 196 0 603 7 107 95 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.38 0.11 0.71 0.38 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 97 2529 804 208 2898 914 572 0 603 97 107 95 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 92.5 28.5 24.4 89.4 25.7 20.6 81.9 0.0 38.9 92.7 50.0 50.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.3 0.4 0.3 14.8 0.1 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.5 8.3 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 9.1 2.3 2.3 9.2 0.1 8.7 0.0 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 102.8 28.9 24.7 104.2 25.8 20.6 92.8 0.0 39.4 101.0 50.1 50.7 LnGrp LOS F C C F C C F A D F D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1052 1070 257 4
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.7 28.8 74.7 63.2
Approach LOS C C E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.8 73.8 10.2 98.0 24.3 54.3 5.0 103.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.5 69.3 21.5 93.5 58.5 20.3 9.5 105.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 8.7 6.4 23.9 19.3 2.8 2.2 24.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.6 0.1 9.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 9.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.8
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4163 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
9: Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh34.6
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 105 367 26 27 292 17 23 164 34 14 122 92 Future Vol, veh/h 105 367 26 27 292 17 23 164 34 14 122 92 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 1 0 7 2 0
Mvmt Flow 111 386 27 28 307 18 24 173 36 15 128 97
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 44.9 40.4 23.8 14

HCM LOS E E C B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 10% 100% 0% 8% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 74% 0% 93% 87% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 15% 0% 7% 5% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 221 105 393 336 14 122 92
LT Vol 23 105 0 27 14 0 0
Through Vol 164 0 367 292 0 122 0
RT Vol 34 0 26 17 0 0 92
Lane Flow Rate 233 111 414 354 15 128 97
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.584 0.263 0.919 0.826 0.038 0.307 0.211 Departure Headway (Hd) 9.045 8.56 7.998 8.406 9.209 8.602 7.84 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 398 419 455 431 388 417 457
Service Time 6.813 6.319 5.757 6.167 6.971 6.363 5.601
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.585 0.265 0.91 0.821 0.039 0.307 0.212 HCM Control Delay 23.8 14.4 53.1 40.4 12.3 15.2 12.7
HCM Lane LOS C B F E B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.6 1 10.4 7.7 0.1 1.3 0.8

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4164 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
10: Lyon Ave & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 10 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh30.5
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 233 20 33 255 32 34 172 43 36 163 11 Future Vol, veh/h 12 233 20 33 255 32 34 172 43 36 163 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 15 3 3 9 0 1 5 6 3 0
Mvmt Flow 14 281 24 40 307 39 41 207 52 43 196 13
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 28.7 46.5 22.1 18.2

HCM LOS D E C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 17% 0% 100% 0% 10% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 83% 0% 0% 92% 80% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 8% 10% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 206 43 12 253 320 36 163 11
LT Vol 34 0 12 0 33 36 0 0
Through Vol 172 0 0 233 255 0 163 0
RT Vol 0 43 0 20 32 0 0 11
Lane Flow Rate 248 52 14 305 386 43 196 13
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Degree of Util (X) 0.605 0.115 0.036 0.712 0.876 0.114 0.484 0.03 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.779 7.978 8.952 8.414 8.181 9.448 8.875 8.094 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 410 448 399 430 443 379 405 441
Service Time 6.549 5.747 6.719 6.181 5.943 7.221 6.647 5.865 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.605 0.116 0.035 0.709 0.871 0.113 0.484 0.029 HCM Control Delay 24.2 11.8 12.1 29.5 46.5 13.4 19.8 11.1 HCM Lane LOS C B B D E B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.9 0.4 0.1 5.5 9.1 0.4 2.6 0.1

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4165 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Esplanade Ave & Lyon Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 11 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 346 14 44 304 55 19 142 45 43 154 35 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 346 14 44 304 55 19 142 45 43 154 35 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 1900 1900 1870 1900 1900 1885 1900 1870 1885 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 360 15 46 317 57 20 148 47 45 160 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 3
Cap, veh/h 73 571 491 112 609 518 67 338 288 109 383 319 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 1870 1610 1810 1870 1590 1810 1885 1610 1781 1885 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 360 15 46 317 57 20 148 47 45 160 36 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1753 1870 1610 1810 1870 1590 1810 1885 1610 1781 1885 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 6.8 0.3 1.0 5.6 1.0 0.4 2.9 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 6.8 0.3 1.0 5.6 1.0 0.4 2.9 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 73 571 491 112 609 518 67 338 288 109 383 319 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.63 0.03 0.41 0.52 0.11 0.30 0.44 0.16 0.41 0.42 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 753 1895 1631 777 1895 1610 777 2141 1829 765 2141 1786 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 12.2 9.9 18.4 11.2 9.6 19.1 14.9 14.2 18.4 14.1 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.2 2.4 0.1 0.4 1.9 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.0 13.3 10.0 19.3 11.8 9.7 20.0 15.8 14.4 19.4 14.9 13.4 LnGrp LOS B B A B B A C B B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 399 420 215 241
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.6 12.4 15.9 15.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.5 11.3 6.5 16.4 5.5 12.3 5.7 17.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 45.0 17.0 40.0 17.0 45.0 17.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 4.9 3.0 8.8 2.4 5.0 2.5 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 2.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.9
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4166 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
12: State St & Sagecrest Dr/College Entrance 07/28/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 42 11 132 33 3 7 131 453 229 44 222 34 Future Volume (vph) 42 11 132 33 3 7 131 453 229 44 222 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1646 1683 1522 1805 1863 1573 1770 1845 1524 Flt Permitted 0.93 0.48 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1543 856 1522 1805 1863 1573 1770 1845 1524 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 47 12 148 37 3 8 147 509 257 49 249 38
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 58 0 0 6 0 0 0 90 0 0 23
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 149 0 37 5 0 147 509 167 49 249 15 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 4 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 6% 0% 14% 0% 2% 1% 2% 3% 6% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 13.0 13.0 12.2 32.2 32.2 5.8 25.8 25.8 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 14.2 35.2 35.2 7.8 28.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.38 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 306 170 302 339 869 734 183 704 582
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.08 c0.27 0.03 0.13
v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04 0.11 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.49 0.22 0.02 0.43 0.59 0.23 0.27 0.35 0.02
Uniform Delay, d1 26.8 25.3 24.3 27.0 14.7 12.0 31.2 16.6 14.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 27.2 25.5 24.3 27.4 15.4 12.0 31.5 16.8 14.5
Level of Service C C C C B B C B B
Approach Delay (s) 27.2 25.2 16.4 18.7
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.4 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4167 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC
13: State St & W Community College Dr
Base Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 0 15 16 1 58 7 784 96 47 316 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 0 15 16 1 58 7 784 96 47 316 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 11 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 7 0 0 2 40 1 1 0 3 0
Mvmt Flow 4 0 17 18 1 65 8 881 108 53 355 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 920 1479 357 1432 1426 506 358 0 0 1000 0 0 Stage 1 463 463 - 962 962 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 457 1016 - 470 464 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.3 6.5 6.305 7.3 6.5 6.93 4.7 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3665 3.5 4 3.319 2.58 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 241 127 673 104 137 512 991 - - 700 - - Stage 1 583 568 - 279 337 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 558 318 - 578 567 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 195 115 672 94 124 507 989 - - 693 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 195 115 - 94 124 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 577 524 - 274 331 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 481 312 - 520 523 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13.5 22 0.1 1.4

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 989 - - 444 95 507 693 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.048 0.201 0.129 0.076 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 - - 13.5 52.2 13.1 10.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 - -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4168 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC
31: Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave
Base Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 247 19 71 223 29 84
Future Vol, veh/h 247 19 71 223 29 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 200 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 11 0 5 10 1
Mvmt Flow 268 21 77 242 32 91
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 291 0 677 147
Stage 1 - - - - 281 -
Stage 2 - - - - 396 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.75 6.915
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.95 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.595 3.3095
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1282 - 387 877
Stage 1 - - - - 722 -
Stage 2 - - - - 658 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1280 - 363 875
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 363 -
Stage 1 - - - - 721 -
Stage 2 - - - - 619 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.9 11.2

HCM LOSB
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 363 875 - - 1280 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.104 - - 0.06 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.9 9.6 - - 8 -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.3 - - 0.2 -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4169 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: State St & W Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 14 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 180 446 421 172 703 261 311 502 90 77 273 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 180 446 421 172 703 261 311 502 90 77 273 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1841 1841 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 188 465 439 179 732 272 324 523 94 80 284 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 4 4 2 2 0 1 1 2 3 2 2
Cap, veh/h 313 1710 530 303 1725 543 384 1114 486 124 498 93 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.21 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.17 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 3483 5025 1559 3456 5106 1609 1795 3582 1562 1767 2984 559 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 188 465 439 179 732 272 324 523 94 80 167 171 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1742 1675 1559 1728 1702 1609 1795 1791 1562 1767 1777 1767 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 5.6 21.6 4.2 9.3 11.3 14.5 9.9 3.7 3.7 7.3 7.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 5.6 21.6 4.2 9.3 11.3 14.5 9.9 3.7 3.7 7.3 7.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 1710 530 303 1725 543 384 1114 486 124 297 295 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.27 0.83 0.59 0.42 0.50 0.84 0.47 0.19 0.65 0.56 0.58 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 874 2523 782 867 2563 808 773 2440 1064 444 892 887 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.6 20.1 25.4 36.7 21.4 22.1 31.5 23.3 21.1 37.9 32.1 32.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 3.0 0.7 0.1 0.3 2.0 0.1 0.1 2.1 0.6 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 2.1 8.0 1.8 3.6 4.1 6.3 4.0 1.3 1.6 3.1 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.3 20.1 28.4 37.4 21.5 22.3 33.5 23.4 21.2 40.0 32.7 33.1 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C C C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1092 1183 941 418
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.4 24.1 26.6 34.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 32.5 21.9 18.0 11.5 32.3 9.9 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 23.6 16.5 9.5 6.3 13.3 5.7 11.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.8 0.4 1.3 0.3 4.2 0.1 2.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.6
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4170 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: State St & Ramona Blvd 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 15 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 195 86 150 211 183 83 672 160 127 612 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 195 86 150 211 183 83 672 160 127 612 28 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1885 1900 1885 1900 1885 1870 1870 1870 1781 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 50 212 93 163 229 199 90 730 0 138 665 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 8 3 3
Cap, veh/h 82 477 389 228 631 518 141 1108 186 1164
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.31 0.00 0.11 0.33 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1711 1885 1539 1795 1900 1559 1781 3647 0 1697 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 50 212 93 163 229 199 90 730 0 138 665 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1711 1885 1539 1795 1900 1559 1781 1777 0 1697 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 7.6 3.9 7.0 7.4 7.9 4.0 14.3 0.0 6.4 12.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 7.6 3.9 7.0 7.4 7.9 4.0 14.3 0.0 6.4 12.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 82 477 389 228 631 518 141 1108 186 1164 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.44 0.24 0.71 0.36 0.38 0.64 0.66 0.74 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 753 958 782 913 966 792 1127 2292 852 2273 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.6 25.3 23.9 33.8 20.5 20.6 36.0 24.0 0.0 34.8 22.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.1 0.7 0.3 4.1 0.4 0.5 4.8 0.7 0.0 5.7 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.1 3.4 1.4 3.2 3.2 2.8 1.9 5.9 0.0 2.9 5.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.7 26.0 24.3 37.9 20.8 21.1 40.8 24.7 0.0 40.5 22.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 355 591 820 A 803 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.2 25.6 26.5 25.8
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.8 29.1 14.2 24.4 11.4 30.6 7.9 30.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.0 50.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 16.3 9.0 9.6 6.0 14.6 4.3 9.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 5.8 0.5 1.6 0.2 5.2 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4171 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
16: State St & Cottonwood Ave/N Brinton St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 16 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 244 63 79 8 46 11 48 692 4 7 750 185 Future Volume (veh/h) 244 63 79 8 46 11 48 692 4 7 750 185 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1826 1900 1900 1796 1796 1870 1870 1870 1900 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 265 68 86 9 50 12 52 752 4 8 815 201 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 5 0 0 7 7 2 2 2 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 315 540 473 26 186 45 85 1638 9 24 1163 287
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.45 0.43 0.01 0.42 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1826 1597 1810 1394 335 1781 3623 19 1810 2787 687 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 265 68 86 9 0 62 52 369 387 8 515 501 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1826 1597 1810 0 1729 1781 1777 1866 1810 1763 1712 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.2 1.9 2.9 0.4 0.0 2.3 2.0 10.2 10.2 0.3 17.1 17.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.2 1.9 2.9 0.4 0.0 2.3 2.0 10.2 10.2 0.3 17.1 17.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.40
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 315 540 473 26 0 231 85 803 843 24 735 714 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.13 0.18 0.35 0.00 0.27 0.61 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 630 774 677 640 0 733 630 1155 1213 640 1146 1113 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.4 18.3 18.7 34.8 0.0 27.7 33.2 13.5 13.5 34.8 17.1 17.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.1 0.2 3.0 0.0 0.7 2.6 0.5 0.5 3.1 1.5 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.4 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.9 3.8 4.0 0.2 6.6 6.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.7 18.5 18.9 37.7 0.0 28.5 35.8 14.0 14.0 37.9 18.6 18.9 LnGrp LOS C B B D A C D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 419 71 808 1024
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.3 29.7 15.4 18.9
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.9 36.2 5.0 25.1 7.4 33.7 16.6 13.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s* 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 25 45.0 * 25 * 30 * 25 45.0 * 25 * 30 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 12.2 2.4 4.9 4.0 19.2 12.2 4.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.2 0.2 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4172 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
17: State St & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 17 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 53 224 49 85 277 81 40 567 48 57 661 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 53 224 49 85 277 81 40 567 48 57 661 55 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1900 1826 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 62 260 57 99 322 94 47 659 56 66 769 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 1 1 0 5 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 267 569 481 330 602 507 128 1428 121 121 1361 113 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.40 0.07 0.41 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 970 1870 1583 1070 1885 1588 1739 3306 281 1781 3313 276 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 62 260 57 99 322 94 47 354 361 66 412 421 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 970 1870 1583 1070 1885 1588 1739 1777 1810 1781 1777 1811 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 7.5 1.7 5.4 9.3 2.8 1.7 9.4 9.4 2.4 11.8 11.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.1 7.5 1.7 12.8 9.3 2.8 1.7 9.4 9.4 2.4 11.8 11.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 267 569 481 330 602 507 128 767 782 121 730 744 V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.46 0.12 0.30 0.54 0.19 0.37 0.46 0.46 0.54 0.56 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 719 1439 1218 812 1450 1222 839 1394 1420 833 1367 1393 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.8 18.7 16.7 23.0 18.5 16.3 29.2 13.4 13.5 29.9 15.0 15.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.7 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.4 1.5 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.9 3.1 0.6 1.3 3.9 1.0 0.7 3.5 3.6 1.0 4.6 4.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 19.5 16.8 23.7 19.6 16.6 29.9 14.3 14.4 31.3 16.4 16.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 379 515 762 899
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.0 19.8 15.3 17.6
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.5 32.6 25.2 8.9 32.3 25.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 * 6 6.0 * 6 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 50.0 * 50 30.0 * 50 49.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 11.4 15.1 3.7 13.8 14.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.4 3.2 0.0 12.4 4.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4173 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
18: State St & W Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 18 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 299 55 84 348 127 45 513 105 143 538 71 Future Volume (veh/h) 47 299 55 84 348 127 45 513 105 143 538 71 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1870 1826 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 315 58 88 366 134 47 540 111 151 566 75 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 5 2 2
Cap, veh/h 110 661 120 140 607 219 104 965 198 215 1242 164 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.22 0.21 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.06 0.33 0.31 0.12 0.39 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 2998 545 1781 2543 915 1753 2929 600 1739 3154 417 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 185 188 88 254 246 47 327 324 151 318 323 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1777 1766 1781 1777 1681 1753 1777 1752 1739 1777 1795 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 5.9 6.0 3.1 8.2 8.5 1.7 9.8 9.9 5.4 8.6 8.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 5.9 6.0 3.1 8.2 8.5 1.7 9.8 9.9 5.4 8.6 8.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.23
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 392 390 140 424 401 104 585 577 215 699 706 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.47 0.48 0.63 0.60 0.61 0.45 0.56 0.56 0.70 0.45 0.46 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 728 989 983 716 989 936 705 1127 1111 699 1127 1138 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.3 21.9 22.1 28.9 21.9 22.2 29.4 17.8 18.0 27.2 14.5 14.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 2.4 2.4 1.3 3.4 3.3 0.7 4.0 4.0 2.2 3.3 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 22.8 23.0 30.6 23.2 23.7 30.5 19.6 19.8 28.7 15.5 15.6 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 422 588 698 792
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.8 24.5 20.4 18.0
Approach LOS C C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.0 25.3 9.1 18.3 7.9 29.5 7.9 19.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.4 11.9 5.1 8.0 3.7 10.6 3.7 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.4 0.1 2.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.2
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4174 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
19: San Jacinto Ave/Bergin St & W Ramona Expy 07/25/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 19 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 475 238 153 965 0 308 1 138 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 475 238 153 965 0 308 1 138 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1885 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 579 290 187 1177 0 376 1 168 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 3 1316 605 222 2070 0 466 3 437 3 4 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.58 0.00 0.26 0.27 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3469 1596 1795 3676 0 1810 10 1602 1810 1900 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 579 290 187 1177 0 376 0 169 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1735 1596 1795 1791 0 1810 0 1612 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 6.7 7.4 5.5 11.1 0.0 10.4 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 6.7 7.4 5.5 11.1 0.0 10.4 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1316 605 222 2070 0 466 0 439 3 4 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.44 0.48 0.84 0.57 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 828 3046 1401 990 3480 0 1021 0 933 1048 1072 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 12.4 12.6 22.9 7.1 0.0 18.6 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.8 3.3 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 2.3 2.4 2.3 3.1 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 12.7 13.4 26.2 7.5 0.0 19.9 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B B C A A B A B A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 869 1364 545 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.9 10.0 18.8 0.0
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.6 24.3 0.0 0.0 34.9 18.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 * 4.2 3.5 6.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.0 * 30 25.0 50.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 9.4 0.0 0.0 13.1 12.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.5 0.0 0.0 15.9 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4175 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd 07/28/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 19 48 15 14 60 61 6 7 243 193 5
Future Volume (vph) 2 19 48 15 14 60 61 6 7 243 193 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.94 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 1697 1771 1872
Flt Permitted 0.85 0.97 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1512 1646 1771 1872
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 21 54 17 16 67 69 7 8 273 217 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 89 0 0 158 0 0 0 281 222 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 5 4 4 2 5 9 2 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 6% 0% 14% 0% 0% 17% 0% 2% 1% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Split Split NA
Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 2
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 15.1 15.1 23.3 23.3
Effective Green, g (s) 16.2 16.2 24.9 24.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.24
Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 234 255 422 446
v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.12
v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.10
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.62 0.67 0.50
Uniform Delay, d1 39.5 41.2 35.9 34.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 3.3 3.9 0.9
Delay (s) 39.9 44.5 39.9 35.2
Level of Service D D D D
Approach Delay (s) 39.9 44.5 37.8
Approach LOS D D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 39.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 104.3 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4176 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd 07/28/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement SBL SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 7 261 38 2 1 42 157
Future Volume (vph) 7 261 38 2 1 42 157
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1842 1770 1483
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1842 1770 1483
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 293 43 2 1 47 176
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 346 0 0 0 48 176
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 9 2 5 6 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 6%
Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot Perm
Protected Phases 3 3 1 1
Permitted Phases 1
Actuated Green, G (s) 26.2 17.8 17.8
Effective Green, g (s) 27.8 19.4 19.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.19 0.19
Clearance Time (s) 5.6 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 490 329 275
v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0.12
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.15 0.64
Uniform Delay, d1 34.6 35.5 39.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.8 0.1 3.8
Delay (s) 38.3 35.6 43.0
Level of Service D D D
Approach Delay (s) 38.3 41.4
Approach LOS D D
Intersection Summary

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4177 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
21: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 21 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 202 77 77 268 118 76 333 70 59 363 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 202 77 77 268 118 76 333 70 59 363 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1856 1900 1885 1885 1885 1870 1885 1870 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 220 84 84 291 128 83 362 76 64 395 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 4 4
Cap, veh/h 36 422 348 87 613 262 86 545 464 68 923 74
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.25 0.22 0.05 0.29 0.30 0.04 0.28 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1870 1540 1810 2415 1031 1795 1870 1542 1781 3271 264 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 220 84 84 214 205 83 362 76 64 210 217 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1870 1540 1810 1791 1656 1795 1870 1542 1781 1749 1786 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 4.2 1.8 1.9 4.1 4.3 1.9 6.9 1.5 1.4 4.0 4.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 4.2 1.8 1.9 4.1 4.3 1.9 6.9 1.5 1.4 4.0 4.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 36 422 348 87 455 420 86 545 464 68 493 504 V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.52 0.24 0.97 0.47 0.49 0.97 0.66 0.16 0.94 0.43 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1099 1915 1576 1099 1833 1695 1090 1664 1387 1082 1556 1589 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.8 13.7 12.8 19.2 12.7 13.2 19.2 12.6 10.4 19.4 11.8 11.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 37.4 0.4 0.1 20.2 0.3 0.3 21.3 0.5 0.1 18.8 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 1.5 0.5 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.2 2.3 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.2 14.1 12.9 39.3 13.0 13.5 40.4 13.1 10.4 38.1 12.0 12.1 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 339 503 521 491
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.2 17.6 17.1 15.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.8 14.2 5.5 15.8 5.9 13.1 5.9 15.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 6.3 3.4 8.9 3.9 6.2 3.9 6.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.0
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4178 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
22: San Jacinto Ave & W Esplanade Ave/E Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 22 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 76 284 165 90 387 62 155 307 48 102 380 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 76 284 165 90 387 62 155 307 48 102 380 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1841 1841 1870 1856 1856 1811 1856 1841 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 84 312 181 99 425 68 170 337 53 112 418 67 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 4 4 2 3 3 6 3 4 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 95 514 291 115 759 121 395 1304 575 133 662 105 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.24 0.22 0.06 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.21 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 2147 1215 1781 3038 483 1725 3526 1554 1810 3091 492 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 84 253 240 99 245 248 170 337 53 112 241 244 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 1749 1614 1781 1763 1758 1725 1763 1554 1810 1791 1792 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 8.1 8.5 3.5 7.7 7.8 5.3 4.2 1.4 3.9 7.7 7.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 8.1 8.5 3.5 7.7 7.8 5.3 4.2 1.4 3.9 7.7 7.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 95 419 387 115 440 439 395 1304 575 133 384 384 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.60 0.62 0.86 0.56 0.56 0.43 0.26 0.09 0.84 0.63 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 535 869 802 548 876 874 531 2281 1005 557 1159 1160 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.8 21.4 22.1 29.3 20.7 20.9 20.9 13.9 13.0 29.0 22.6 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.0 0.5 0.6 6.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.6 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 3.2 3.1 1.6 3.0 3.1 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.8 3.1 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 21.9 22.7 36.2 21.1 21.4 21.2 13.9 13.1 34.4 23.2 23.4 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C C B B C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 577 592 560 597
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.8 23.7 16.1 25.4
Approach LOS C C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.6 27.4 8.1 19.2 18.5 17.6 7.4 19.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 40.0 20.0 30.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 6.2 5.5 10.5 7.3 9.9 5.0 9.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.6 0.1 1.9 0.2 2.0 0.1 1.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4179 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
23: S Hewitt St & Main St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 23 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.3
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 124 120 106 138 191 115
Future Vol, veh/h 0 124 120 106 138 191 115
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 5 3 2 1
Mvmt Flow 0 131 126 112 145 201 121
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 2
HCM Control Delay 10.9 10.3 12.4

HCM LOS B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2
Vol Left, % 62% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 51% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 38% 49% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 306 244 106 138
LT Vol 191 0 106 0
Through Vol 0 124 0 138
RT Vol 115 120 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 322 257 112 145
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.453 0.36 0.195 0.232
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.176 5.044 6.297 5.756
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 699 717 572 628
Service Time 3.176 3.044 4.004 3.463
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.461 0.358 0.196 0.231
HCM Control Delay 12.4 10.9 10.5 10.2
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.4 1.6 0.7 0.9

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4180 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
24: S Hewitt St & E 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 24 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh78.8
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 218 69 58 240 49 114 243 78 38 180 35 Future Vol, veh/h 28 218 69 58 240 49 114 243 78 38 180 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 0 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 32 251 79 67 276 56 131 279 90 44 207 40
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 51.6 64.1 135.5 35.1

HCM LOS F F F E

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 26% 9% 17% 15%
Vol Thru, % 56% 69% 69% 71%
Vol Right, % 18% 22% 14% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 435 315 347 253
LT Vol 114 28 58 38
Through Vol 243 218 240 180
RT Vol 78 69 49 35
Lane Flow Rate 500 362 399 291
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 1.192 0.877 0.947 0.731
Departure Headway (Hd) 8.579 9.392 9.211 9.734
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 425 387 395 375
Service Time 6.651 7.392 7.211 7.734
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.176 0.935 1.01 0.776
HCM Control Delay 135.5 51.6 64.1 35.1
HCM Lane LOS F F F E
HCM 95th-tile Q 19.5 8.7 10.6 5.6

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4181 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
25: S Hewitt St & E Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 25 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 271 80 58 359 66 106 220 41 56 225 114 Future Volume (veh/h) 47 271 80 58 359 66 106 220 41 56 225 114 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1870 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 304 90 65 403 74 119 247 46 63 253 128 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 3
Cap, veh/h 127 697 202 142 793 144 187 832 152 137 460 388 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.26 0.24 0.08 0.27 0.25 0.10 0.28 0.26 0.08 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2701 783 1810 2990 544 1781 3020 554 1781 1856 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 198 196 65 238 239 119 145 148 63 253 128 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1707 1810 1777 1757 1781 1791 1782 1781 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 4.8 5.0 1.8 5.8 6.0 3.3 3.3 3.4 1.7 6.1 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 4.8 5.0 1.8 5.8 6.0 3.3 3.3 3.4 1.7 6.1 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 127 458 440 142 471 466 187 493 491 137 460 388 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.43 0.45 0.46 0.50 0.51 0.64 0.29 0.30 0.46 0.55 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 901 1417 1361 915 1417 1401 901 1428 1421 901 1479 1248 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.9 15.9 16.2 22.7 16.0 16.2 22.1 14.7 14.9 22.7 16.9 15.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 1.8 1.9 0.7 2.2 2.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 0.7 2.5 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.7 16.8 17.2 23.5 17.2 17.5 23.4 15.2 15.3 23.6 18.3 16.6 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 447 542 412 444
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 18.1 17.6 18.6
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 18.2 8.0 17.3 9.4 16.7 7.7 17.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 5.4 3.8 7.0 5.3 8.1 3.5 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 0.0 3.7 0.1 3.0 0.0 4.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.0
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4182 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
26: S Hewitt St & E Commonwealth Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 26 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 75 30 47 137 23 56 309 65 18 279 62 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 75 30 47 137 23 56 309 65 18 279 62 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1841 1841 1870 1900 1900 1900 1885 1900 1737 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 85 34 53 156 26 64 351 74 20 317 70 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 4 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 11 2 0
Cap, veh/h 121 184 74 163 234 39 812 1490 1271 719 1478 1271 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Sat Flow, veh/h 1188 1245 498 1262 1586 264 1012 1885 1608 893 1870 1608 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 0 119 53 0 182 64 351 74 20 317 70 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1188 0 1743 1262 0 1850 1012 1885 1608 893 1870 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 8.1 5.2 0.0 12.0 2.2 6.2 1.3 0.8 5.5 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 0.0 8.1 13.2 0.0 12.0 7.7 6.2 1.3 7.0 5.5 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 121 0 257 163 0 273 812 1490 1271 719 1478 1271 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.46 0.32 0.00 0.67 0.08 0.24 0.06 0.03 0.21 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 498 0 810 564 0 860 812 1490 1271 719 1478 1271 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.4 0.0 50.4 56.4 0.0 52.0 4.4 3.5 3.0 4.4 3.4 3.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 1.3 1.1 0.0 2.8 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 0.0 3.6 1.7 0.0 5.8 0.5 2.2 0.4 0.1 1.9 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.7 0.0 51.7 57.5 0.0 54.8 4.6 3.9 3.1 4.5 3.7 3.0 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 154 235 489 407
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.7 55.4 3.8 3.7
Approach LOS D E A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 106.0 23.1 106.0 23.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 101.5 59.5 101.5 59.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 17.7 9.0 15.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 0.9 2.5 1.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.2
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4183 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
27: W Ramona Expy & Main St/Lake Park Dr 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 27 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 93 42 94 75 43 56 836 212 57 412 36 Future Volume (veh/h) 26 93 42 94 75 43 56 836 212 57 412 36 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1870 1841 1856 1870 1900 1885 1885 1870 1826 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 30 106 48 107 85 49 64 950 241 65 468 41 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 2 4 3 2 0 1 1 2 5 5
Cap, veh/h 190 191 166 213 225 190 119 1345 340 118 1535 134 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.48 0.44 0.07 0.48 0.44 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1826 1585 1753 1856 1563 1810 2831 717 1781 3228 282 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 30 106 48 107 85 49 64 600 591 65 251 258 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1826 1585 1753 1856 1563 1810 1791 1756 1781 1735 1775 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 3.8 1.9 3.9 2.9 2.0 2.4 18.2 18.5 2.4 6.1 6.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 3.8 1.9 3.9 2.9 2.0 2.4 18.2 18.5 2.4 6.1 6.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.16
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 190 191 166 213 225 190 119 851 834 118 825 844 V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.55 0.29 0.50 0.38 0.26 0.54 0.71 0.71 0.55 0.30 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 815 822 714 1082 1145 965 815 1106 1084 673 945 967 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.1 29.3 28.4 28.3 27.8 27.4 31.1 14.3 14.8 31.2 11.1 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.9 0.7 2.6 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.5 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 1.7 0.7 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.0 6.9 7.0 1.1 2.2 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 31.1 29.2 30.9 29.3 28.4 32.5 15.9 16.4 32.6 11.3 11.5 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 184 241 1255 574
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.2 29.8 17.0 13.8
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.6 36.7 11.2 8.5 36.7 12.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 41.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 20.5 5.8 4.4 8.2 5.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.7 0.6 0.0 3.9 1.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.6
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4184 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
28: Mountain Ave/Ramona Expy & E 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 28 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 112 1 78 4 0 0 66 996 0 5 455 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 112 1 78 4 0 0 66 996 0 5 455 61
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 1826 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 137 1 95 5 0 0 80 1215 0 6 555 74
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 5
Cap, veh/h 201 2 204 5 34 0 103 2081 0 3 1632 217
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.13 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.49 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 17 1596 1810 1900 0 1810 3676 0 1810 3078 409 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 137 0 96 5 0 0 80 1215 0 6 312 317 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1613 1810 1900 0 1810 1791 0 1810 1735 1752 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 0.0 3.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 12.0 0.0 0.1 5.7 5.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 3.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 12.0 0.0 0.1 5.7 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.23
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 201 0 207 5 34 0 103 2081 0 3 920 929 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.00 0.46 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.58 0.00 1.85 0.34 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 985 0 938 640 727 0 650 3344 0 640 1619 1636 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.8 0.0 23.1 27.8 0.0 0.0 25.9 7.4 0.0 27.8 7.5 7.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.6 131.1 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.4 0.0 461.0 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.7 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.4 0.0 0.5 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.3 0.0 23.7 158.9 0.0 0.0 30.5 7.8 0.0 488.8 7.8 8.0 LnGrp LOS C A C F A A C A A F A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 233 5 1295 635
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 158.9 9.2 12.4
Approach LOS C F A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.9 33.5 10.3 5.0 4.1 36.4 4.1 11.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 6.0 4.8 5.3 3.7 6.0 3.7 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 50.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 31.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 7.9 6.1 0.0 2.1 14.0 2.1 5.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4185 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
29: Ramona Expy & E Esplanade Ave 07/28/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 273 69 123 719 346 180
Future Volume (vph) 273 69 123 719 346 180
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1553 1787 1863 1776 1599
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1553 1787 1863 1776 1599
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83
Adj. Flow (vph) 329 83 148 866 417 217
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 59 0 0 0 101
Lane Group Flow (vph) 329 24 148 866 417 116
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 1% 2% 7% 1%
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 5 3 8 4
Permitted Phases 5 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 25.1 25.1 13.4 49.7 31.8 31.8
Effective Green, g (s) 26.1 26.1 13.9 52.2 34.3 34.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.58 0.38 0.38
Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 516 448 275 1076 674 607
v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.08 c0.46 0.23
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.05 0.54 0.80 0.62 0.19
Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 23.2 35.2 15.0 22.7 18.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.0 1.0 4.7 1.9 0.2
Delay (s) 30.2 23.2 36.3 19.7 24.6 18.9
Level of Service C C D B C B
Approach Delay (s) 28.8 22.2 22.7
Approach LOS C C C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.3 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4186 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
30: Soboba Rd & Lake Park Dr 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 30 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 193 3 97 1 2 0 79 23 0 0 40 85
Future Volume (veh/h) 193 3 97 1 2 0 79 23 0 0 40 85
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1781 1900 1900 1900 1826 1841 1841 1900 1826 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 214 3 108 1 2 0 88 26 0 0 44 94
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 4 4 0 5 2
Cap, veh/h 368 5 311 2 4 0 213 807 0 5 401 348
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1786 25 1510 623 1246 0 1739 1841 0 1810 1826 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 217 0 108 3 0 0 88 26 0 0 44 94
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1811 0 1510 1869 0 0 1739 1841 0 1810 1826 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.6 Prop In Lane 0.99 1.00 0.33 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 373 0 311 6 0 0 213 807 0 5 401 348 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.00 0.35 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1252 0 1043 337 0 0 669 1919 0 343 1547 1343 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.9 0.0 11.3 16.6 0.0 0.0 13.5 5.3 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.2 26.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.5 0.0 11.5 42.8 0.0 0.0 14.8 5.3 0.0 0.0 10.5 11.3 LnGrp LOS B A B D A A B A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 325 3 114 138
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.1 42.8 12.6 11.0
Approach LOS B D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.3 11.3 3.8 0.0 18.6 10.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 3.7 4.5 5.3 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 26.9 6.3 5.0 33.4 22.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 3.6 2.1 0.0 2.3 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4187 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC
31: Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 31 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 247 19 71 223 29 84
Future Vol, veh/h 247 19 71 223 29 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 200 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 11 0 5 10 1
Mvmt Flow 268 21 77 242 32 91
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 291 0 677 147
Stage 1 - - - - 281 -
Stage 2 - - - - 396 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.75 6.915
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.95 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.595 3.3095
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1282 - 387 877
Stage 1 - - - - 722 -
Stage 2 - - - - 658 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1280 - 363 875
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 363 -
Stage 1 - - - - 677 -
Stage 2 - - - - 658 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.9 11.2

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4188 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
32: Cawaston Ave & Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 32 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 26.6
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 48 131 159 181 138 12 61 97 109 7 151 45 Future Vol, veh/h 48 131 159 181 138 12 61 97 109 7 151 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 1 0 1 8 2 3 1 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 55 151 183 208 159 14 70 111 125 8 174 52
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 3 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 31.6 36.7 13.2 19.5

HCM LOS D E B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 14% 55% 3%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 39% 42% 74%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 47% 4% 22%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 61 97 109 338 331 203
LT Vol 61 0 0 48 181 7
Through Vol 0 97 0 131 138 151
RT Vol 0 0 109 159 12 45
Lane Flow Rate 70 111 125 389 380 233
Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.169 0.253 0.257 0.784 0.817 0.524
Departure Headway (Hd) 8.654 8.155 7.396 7.261 7.735 8.086 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 414 439 485 501 472 446
Service Time 6.417 5.918 5.159 4.978 5.454 5.85
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.169 0.253 0.258 0.776 0.805 0.522
HCM Control Delay 13.2 13.7 12.7 31.6 36.7 19.5
HCM Lane LOS B B B D E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1 1 7.1 7.7 3

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4189 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
33: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Blvd 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 33 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 39 149 984 26 84 578
Future Volume (veh/h) 39 149 984 26 84 578
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1885 1900 1870 1841
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 44 167 1106 29 94 649
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 1 0 2 4
Cap, veh/h 224 193 2558 1150 128 2854
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.71 0.71 0.07 0.82
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1560 3676 1610 1781 3589
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 44 167 1106 29 94 649
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1560 1791 1610 1781 1749
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 14.0 17.0 0.7 6.9 5.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 14.0 17.0 0.7 6.9 5.6
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 224 193 2558 1150 128 2854
V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.86 0.43 0.03 0.73 0.23
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 230 199 2558 1150 387 3362
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.5 57.4 7.9 5.6 60.7 2.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 29.8 0.5 0.0 7.9 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.4 7.1 6.4 0.2 3.4 1.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.0 87.2 8.4 5.6 68.6 2.8
LnGrp LOS D F A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 211 1135 743
Approach Delay, s/veh 80.1 8.3 11.1
Approach LOS F A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.6 99.4 113.0 20.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 94.9 127.9 16.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.9 19.0 7.6 16.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 11.5 5.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.6
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4190 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
34: Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 34 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh10.8
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 183 16 12 87 18 21 134 30 30 130 40 Future Vol, veh/h 37 183 16 12 87 18 21 134 30 30 130 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 3
Mvmt Flow 41 203 18 13 97 20 23 149 33 33 144 44
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 11.6 9.8 10.5 10.8

HCM LOS B A B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 11% 16% 10% 15%
Vol Thru, % 72% 78% 74% 65%
Vol Right, % 16% 7% 15% 20%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 185 236 117 200
LT Vol 21 37 12 30
Through Vol 134 183 87 130
RT Vol 30 16 18 40
Lane Flow Rate 206 262 130 222
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.3 0.386 0.195 0.325
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.252 5.299 5.408 5.261
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 684 679 663 682
Service Time 3.288 3.334 3.448 3.295
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.301 0.386 0.196 0.326
HCM Control Delay 10.5 11.6 9.8 10.8
HCM Lane LOS B B A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 1.8 0.7 1.4

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4191 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
35: Ramona Expy/Mountain Ave & Hemet St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 35 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 207 17 12 10 33 11 14 620 4 6 300 103 Future Volume (veh/h) 207 17 12 10 33 11 14 620 4 6 300 103 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1693 1885 1530 1900 1767 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 249 20 14 12 40 13 17 747 5 7 361 124 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 1 25 0 9 0
Cap, veh/h 313 241 169 50 119 39 53 957 658 40 877 800
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.23 0.21 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.51 0.51 0.02 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1041 728 1795 1373 446 1612 1885 1296 1810 1767 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 249 0 34 12 0 53 17 747 5 7 361 124 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1769 1795 0 1820 1612 1885 1296 1810 1767 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 0.0 1.2 0.5 0.0 2.1 0.8 24.5 0.1 0.3 9.8 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 0.0 1.2 0.5 0.0 2.1 0.8 24.5 0.1 0.3 9.8 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 0 410 50 0 157 53 957 658 40 877 800 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.00 0.08 0.24 0.00 0.34 0.32 0.78 0.01 0.17 0.41 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 620 0 963 734 0 1110 552 1193 820 739 1234 1125 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.1 0.0 23.1 36.1 0.0 32.8 35.8 15.2 9.2 36.4 12.1 10.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 1.8 1.3 3.9 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.4 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.3 10.3 0.0 0.1 3.7 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.8 0.0 23.2 37.0 0.0 34.5 37.1 19.1 9.2 37.2 12.7 10.6 LnGrp LOS C A C D A C D B A D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 283 65 769 492
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.8 35.0 19.4 12.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.7 42.5 6.1 21.6 6.5 41.7 17.1 10.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.0 30.0 40.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 45.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 26.5 2.5 3.2 2.8 11.8 12.0 4.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 6.0 0.2 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.0
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4192 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Warren Rd & Ramona Expy 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 768 276 310 667 3 137 0 265 4 1 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 1 768 276 310 667 3 137 0 265 4 1 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1856 1826 1826 1841 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1 808 291 326 702 3 144 0 279 4 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 3 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 18 1327 601 383 2057 9 394 0 390 140 42 41
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.37 0.37 0.22 0.58 0.53 0.24 0.00 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3554 1610 1767 3543 15 1391 0 1610 251 174 170 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1 808 291 326 344 361 144 0 279 7 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1777 1610 1767 1735 1823 1391 0 1610 596 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 13.2 9.9 12.7 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 13.2 9.9 12.7 7.4 7.4 8.0 0.0 11.5 11.6 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 18 1327 601 383 1007 1059 394 0 390 223 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.06 0.61 0.48 0.85 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.00 0.72 0.03 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 646 2419 1096 877 1181 1241 872 0 943 673 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.2 18.2 17.2 27.0 7.9 7.9 23.6 0.0 25.9 21.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.5 0.6 2.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 5.1 3.5 5.3 2.4 2.5 2.1 0.0 4.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.7 18.7 17.8 29.0 8.1 8.1 24.0 0.0 27.7 21.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B B C A A C A C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1100 1031 423 7
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.4 14.7 26.5 21.6
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.6 30.8 21.4 4.7 45.6 21.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 7.8 6.0 4.6 7.8 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 45.0 40.0 25.0 45.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.7 15.2 13.6 2.0 9.4 13.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 7.8 0.0 0.0 5.0 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.3
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4193 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Warren Rd & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 23 19 58 30 59 20 321 117 125 464 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 23 19 58 30 59 20 321 117 125 464 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1767 1900 1870 1796 1796 1900 1856 1885 1900 1885 1796 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 24 20 60 31 61 21 334 122 130 483 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 9 0 2 7 7 0 3 1 0 1 7
Cap, veh/h 85 271 243 176 369 312 121 528 455 240 661 533 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1767 1585 1781 1796 1519 1810 1856 1598 1810 1885 1522 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 24 20 60 31 61 21 334 122 130 483 16 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1767 1585 1781 1796 1519 1810 1856 1598 1810 1885 1522 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.6 0.5 1.5 0.7 1.6 0.5 7.6 2.9 3.2 10.8 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.6 0.5 1.5 0.7 1.6 0.5 7.6 2.9 3.2 10.8 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 85 271 243 176 369 312 121 528 455 240 661 533 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.34 0.08 0.20 0.17 0.63 0.27 0.54 0.73 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1010 1169 1049 994 1188 1005 1010 1995 1718 1010 2027 1637 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.0 17.6 17.6 20.3 15.5 15.9 21.3 15.1 13.4 19.6 13.7 10.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.2 2.8 0.9 1.3 3.9 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.1 17.6 17.6 20.8 15.6 16.0 21.6 15.6 13.5 20.3 14.3 10.3 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 48 152 477 629
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 17.8 15.3 15.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.4 17.8 8.8 11.4 7.2 20.9 6.3 13.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 50.0 25.0 30.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 9.6 3.5 2.6 2.5 12.8 2.1 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4194 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
3: Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh39.2
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 35 3 96 48 40 3 396 158 85 401 59 Future Vol, veh/h 21 35 3 96 48 40 3 396 158 85 401 59
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 22 37 3 101 51 42 3 417 166 89 422 62
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 12.2 14.8 44.2 45.2

HCM LOS B B E E

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 1% 36% 52% 16%
Vol Thru, % 71% 59% 26% 74%
Vol Right, % 28% 5% 22% 11%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 557 59 184 545
LT Vol 3 21 96 85
Through Vol 396 35 48 401
RT Vol 158 3 40 59
Lane Flow Rate 586 62 194 574
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.928 0.136 0.387 0.93
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.701 7.858 7.191 5.837
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 633 454 500 620
Service Time 3.75 5.944 5.255 3.886
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.926 0.137 0.388 0.926
HCM Control Delay 44.2 12.2 14.8 45.2
HCM Lane LOS E B B E
HCM 95th-tile Q 12.2 0.5 1.8 12.2

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4195 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Expy 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 318 558 147 48 351 466 87 582 42 796 1207 481 Future Volume (veh/h) 318 558 147 48 351 466 87 582 42 796 1207 481 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 1885 1900 1885 1856 1870 1870 1900 1870 1885 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 328 575 152 49 362 480 90 600 43 821 1244 496 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 1 0 1 3 2 2 0 2 1 5
Cap, veh/h 406 1262 605 137 984 799 161 788 389 873 1532 817 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.36 0.34 0.04 0.27 0.26 0.05 0.22 0.20 0.25 0.43 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 3401 3554 1577 3510 3582 1572 3456 3554 1610 3456 3582 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 328 575 152 49 362 480 90 600 43 821 1244 496 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1700 1777 1577 1755 1791 1572 1728 1777 1610 1728 1791 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.4 15.1 8.0 1.7 9.9 26.3 3.1 19.2 2.5 28.3 37.0 27.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.4 15.1 8.0 1.7 9.9 26.3 3.1 19.2 2.5 28.3 37.0 27.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 406 1262 605 137 984 799 161 788 389 873 1532 817 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.46 0.25 0.36 0.37 0.60 0.56 0.76 0.11 0.94 0.81 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 579 1262 605 598 1267 924 589 1257 602 873 1562 830 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.2 30.2 25.6 56.9 35.6 21.1 56.7 44.3 35.9 44.5 30.5 19.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.6 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.0 17.6 3.1 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.1 6.5 3.0 0.7 4.4 9.5 1.4 8.5 1.0 14.2 16.3 9.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 30.3 25.7 57.5 35.6 21.5 57.9 44.9 35.9 62.1 33.6 20.8 LnGrp LOS E C C E D C E D D E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1055 891 733 2561
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.5 29.2 45.9 40.2
Approach LOS D C D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s34.7 30.9 8.7 47.2 9.7 56.0 18.5 37.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s* 4.7 7.0 * 4.7 7.0 * 4.7 7.0 * 4.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 30 40.0 * 20 40.0 * 20 50.0 * 20 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 30.3 21.2 3.7 17.1 5.1 39.0 13.4 28.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.9 0.1 5.7 0.4 2.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.6
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4196 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 77 219 51 88 122 59 22 466 92 106 988 112 Future Volume (veh/h) 77 219 51 88 122 59 22 466 92 106 988 112 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1900 1870 1885 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 79 223 52 90 124 60 22 476 94 108 1008 114 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 308 558 247 318 299 245 171 1717 772 330 1893 844 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.53 0.53 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3610 1601 3510 1900 1555 3510 3554 1598 3510 3582 1598 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 79 223 52 90 124 60 22 476 94 108 1008 114 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 1601 1755 1900 1555 1755 1777 1598 1755 1791 1598 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 5.0 2.6 2.2 5.3 3.0 0.5 7.2 2.9 2.6 16.6 3.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 5.0 2.6 2.2 5.3 3.0 0.5 7.2 2.9 2.6 16.6 3.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 308 558 247 318 299 245 171 1717 772 330 1893 844 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.40 0.21 0.28 0.41 0.24 0.13 0.28 0.12 0.33 0.53 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1014 1696 752 1014 893 730 1014 1717 772 1014 1893 844 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.3 34.3 33.3 38.2 34.2 33.2 41.0 13.9 12.8 38.1 13.9 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 2.2 1.0 0.9 2.5 1.2 0.2 2.9 1.1 1.1 6.5 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 34.8 33.7 38.4 35.1 33.7 41.1 14.3 13.1 38.3 15.0 11.1 LnGrp LOS D C C D D C D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 354 274 592 1230
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.4 35.9 15.1 16.7
Approach LOS D D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.2 17.9 8.4 51.6 11.9 18.2 12.5 47.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 7.0 2.5 18.6 3.9 7.3 4.6 9.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.7 0.0 8.0 0.1 0.9 0.2 3.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.2
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4197 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Sanderson Ave & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 105 38 124 94 48 35 616 123 64 1006 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 105 38 124 94 48 35 616 123 64 1006 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1722 1900 1900 1870 1856 1856 1900 1870 1870 1900 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 113 41 133 101 52 38 662 132 69 1082 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 12 0 0 2 3 3 0 2 2 0 2 0
Cap, veh/h 43 190 69 195 261 134 95 1299 259 125 1621 734 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.14 0.13 0.11 0.23 0.21 0.05 0.44 0.40 0.07 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 1640 1329 482 1781 1154 594 1810 2953 588 1810 3554 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 154 133 0 153 38 398 396 69 1082 23 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1640 0 1812 1781 0 1748 1810 1777 1764 1810 1777 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 5.4 4.8 0.0 5.0 1.4 10.8 11.0 2.5 16.0 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 5.4 4.8 0.0 5.0 1.4 10.8 11.0 2.5 16.0 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 43 0 259 195 0 395 95 782 776 125 1621 734 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.59 0.68 0.00 0.39 0.40 0.51 0.51 0.55 0.67 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 636 0 1107 956 0 1329 701 1258 1249 971 3046 1380 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.0 0.0 27.0 28.7 0.0 22.2 30.7 13.6 13.9 30.2 14.3 10.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 2.2 1.6 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 0.0 2.4 2.1 0.0 2.0 0.6 4.0 4.1 1.1 5.7 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.8 0.0 29.2 30.3 0.0 22.8 31.7 14.1 14.4 31.7 14.7 10.1 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 163 286 832 1174
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.4 26.3 15.0 15.6
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.6 33.5 11.3 13.6 7.5 34.6 5.8 19.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 45.0 35.0 40.0 25.0 55.0 25.0 50.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 13.0 6.8 7.4 3.4 18.0 2.4 7.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.8 0.1 0.9 0.0 10.1 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.6
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4198 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Sanderson Ave & Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 7 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 76 169 30 142 199 43 64 635 92 107 976 86 Future Volume (veh/h) 76 169 30 142 199 43 64 635 92 107 976 86 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1885 1870 1900 1900 1885 1885 1885 1826 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 81 180 32 151 212 46 68 676 98 114 1038 91 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 1
Cap, veh/h 140 282 239 211 354 302 133 1339 194 169 1551 697 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.43 0.40 0.09 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1885 1594 1795 1870 1597 1810 3139 455 1795 3469 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 81 180 32 151 212 46 68 385 389 114 1038 91 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1885 1594 1795 1870 1597 1810 1791 1803 1795 1735 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 6.8 1.3 6.1 7.8 1.8 2.7 11.9 12.0 4.6 17.8 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 6.8 1.3 6.1 7.8 1.8 2.7 11.9 12.0 4.6 17.8 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 140 282 239 211 354 302 133 764 769 169 1551 697 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.64 0.13 0.71 0.60 0.15 0.51 0.50 0.51 0.67 0.67 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 737 774 654 737 768 656 743 1114 1122 737 2159 971 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.6 30.2 27.9 32.1 28.0 25.6 33.7 15.8 16.0 33.1 16.5 12.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 3.4 0.4 1.7 2.3 0.3 1.1 0.7 0.7 1.7 0.7 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 3.2 0.5 2.7 3.6 0.7 1.2 4.7 4.8 2.0 6.6 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.0 33.6 28.2 33.8 30.3 25.9 34.8 16.6 16.8 34.8 17.2 12.4 LnGrp LOS D C C C C C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 293 409 842 1243
Approach Delay, s/veh 33.4 31.1 18.1 18.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.1 36.2 12.9 15.3 9.6 37.8 9.9 18.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 14.0 8.1 8.8 4.7 19.8 5.3 9.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.0 0.1 1.5 0.0 11.9 0.1 1.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.8
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4199 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Lyon Ave/Potter Rd & Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy 07/25/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 8 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 1221 157 45 742 3 122 3 39 5 8 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 1221 157 45 742 3 122 3 39 5 8 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 907 1885 1870 1900 1870 1900 1885 1411 1411 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 1272 164 47 773 3 127 3 41 5 8 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 67 1 2 0 2 0 1 33 33 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 5 3010 908 65 3137 989 150 24 328 15 421 322 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.58 0.58 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.22 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 864 5147 1552 1810 5106 1610 1795 82 1126 1810 1948 1489 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 1272 164 47 773 3 127 0 44 5 7 8 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 864 1716 1552 1810 1702 1610 1795 0 1208 1810 1805 1632 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 27.5 9.9 5.2 13.9 0.1 14.1 0.0 5.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 27.5 9.9 5.2 13.9 0.1 14.1 0.0 5.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.91
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 5 3010 908 65 3137 989 150 0 352 15 390 353 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.42 0.18 0.72 0.25 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.12 0.32 0.02 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 47 3010 908 215 3315 1045 418 0 352 90 390 353 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh100.0 23.1 19.4 96.3 17.7 15.0 91.1 0.0 52.7 99.4 62.2 62.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 65.8 0.4 0.4 14.1 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.7 11.6 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 11.6 3.8 2.7 5.7 0.1 7.1 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 165.7 23.5 19.9 110.4 17.7 15.0 103.1 0.0 53.5 111.1 62.2 62.5 LnGrp LOS F C B F B B F A D F E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1439 823 171 20
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.4 23.0 90.3 74.5
Approach LOS C C F E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.7 62.8 11.2 122.0 20.9 47.6 5.3 128.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.5 58.3 23.5 117.5 46.5 21.3 10.5 130.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 7.4 7.2 29.5 16.1 2.7 2.7 15.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.1 15.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 6.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.4
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4200 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
9: Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh17.5
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 257 34 17 225 19 28 169 21 17 182 56 Future Vol, veh/h 73 257 34 17 225 19 28 169 21 17 182 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 74 262 35 17 230 19 29 172 21 17 186 57
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 18.7 19.5 18 13.4

HCM LOS C C C B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 13% 100% 0% 7% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 78% 0% 88% 86% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 10% 0% 12% 7% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 218 73 291 261 17 182 56
LT Vol 28 73 0 17 17 0 0
Through Vol 169 0 257 225 0 182 0
RT Vol 21 0 34 19 0 0 56
Lane Flow Rate 222 74 297 266 17 186 57
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.487 0.162 0.598 0.558 0.038 0.379 0.105 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.882 7.828 7.251 7.544 7.848 7.353 6.617 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 456 457 496 477 455 488 539
Service Time 5.654 5.593 5.016 5.312 5.615 5.119 4.383
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.487 0.162 0.599 0.558 0.037 0.381 0.106 HCM Control Delay 18 12.1 20.3 19.5 10.9 14.6 10.2
HCM Lane LOS C B C C B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.6 0.6 3.9 3.4 0.1 1.7 0.3

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4201 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
10: Lyon Ave & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 10 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh40.6
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 272 21 59 307 38 34 176 37 36 206 11 Future Vol, veh/h 10 272 21 59 307 38 34 176 37 36 206 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 2 2 8 0 1 3 0 3 9
Mvmt Flow 11 292 23 63 330 41 37 189 40 39 222 12
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 31.7 72.1 21 20.3

HCM LOS D F C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 16% 0% 100% 0% 15% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 84% 0% 0% 93% 76% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 7% 9% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 210 37 10 293 404 36 206 11
LT Vol 34 0 10 0 59 36 0 0
Through Vol 176 0 0 272 307 0 206 0
RT Vol 0 37 0 21 38 0 0 11
Lane Flow Rate 226 40 11 315 434 39 222 12
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Degree of Util (X) 0.564 0.091 0.027 0.746 1 0.101 0.552 0.027 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.99 8.229 9.102 8.523 8.29 9.413 8.964 8.367 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 406 440 398 428 439 385 408 433
Service Time 6.653 5.892 6.756 6.223 5.997 7.068 6.62 6.023 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.557 0.091 0.028 0.736 0.989 0.101 0.544 0.028 HCM Control Delay 22.6 11.7 12 32.4 72.1 13.1 22.1 11.3 HCM Lane LOS C B B D F B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.4 0.3 0.1 6.1 12.8 0.3 3.2 0.1

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4202 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: Esplanade Ave & Lyon Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 11 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 403 24 70 352 64 17 194 82 44 233 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 403 24 70 352 64 17 194 82 44 233 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1885 1885 1856 1900 1885 1870 1900 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 420 25 73 367 67 18 202 85 46 243 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 2 0 4 4
Cap, veh/h 75 618 527 136 683 569 59 374 315 106 413 350 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1885 1609 1795 1885 1571 1810 1885 1585 1810 1841 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 420 25 73 367 67 18 202 85 46 243 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1885 1609 1795 1885 1571 1810 1885 1585 1810 1841 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 9.1 0.5 1.8 7.3 1.3 0.5 4.5 2.1 1.2 5.6 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 9.1 0.5 1.8 7.3 1.3 0.5 4.5 2.1 1.2 5.6 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 75 618 527 136 683 569 59 374 315 106 413 350 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.68 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.12 0.30 0.54 0.27 0.43 0.59 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 672 1652 1410 667 1652 1377 672 1852 1557 672 1808 1532 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.0 13.7 10.8 21.0 11.9 10.0 22.3 17.0 16.0 21.4 16.3 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 1.3 0.0 1.2 0.7 0.1 1.0 1.2 0.5 1.0 1.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 3.4 0.2 0.7 2.6 0.4 0.2 1.8 0.7 0.5 2.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.0 15.0 10.9 22.2 12.6 10.1 23.3 18.2 16.5 22.5 17.7 14.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 471 507 305 314
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.3 13.6 18.0 18.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.8 13.4 7.6 19.4 5.5 14.6 5.9 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 45.0 17.0 40.0 17.0 45.0 17.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 6.5 3.8 11.1 2.5 7.6 2.7 9.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 2.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4203 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
12: State St & Sagecrest Dr/College Entrance 07/28/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 16 6 51 105 6 31 96 391 88 8 525 38 Future Volume (vph) 16 6 51 105 6 31 96 391 88 8 525 38 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.91 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1750 1659 1805 1863 1545 1612 1881 1615 Flt Permitted 0.94 0.73 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1598 1340 1659 1805 1863 1545 1612 1881 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 17 6 54 112 6 33 102 416 94 9 559 40
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 44 0 0 27 0 0 0 39 0 0 21
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 33 0 112 12 0 102 416 55 9 559 19 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 2% 3% 12% 1% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 10.9 48.4 48.4 0.8 38.3 38.3 Effective Green, g (s) 16.4 16.4 16.4 12.9 51.4 51.4 2.8 41.3 41.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.58 0.58 0.03 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 298 250 309 264 1089 903 51 883 758
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.06 0.22 0.01 c0.30
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.08 0.04 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.45 0.04 0.39 0.38 0.06 0.18 0.63 0.02
Uniform Delay, d1 29.7 31.7 29.3 33.9 9.8 7.9 41.4 17.6 12.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 Delay (s) 29.8 32.2 29.3 34.3 9.8 7.9 42.0 18.7 12.5
Level of Service C C C C A A D B B
Approach Delay (s) 29.8 31.5 13.6 18.6
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87.9 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4204 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC
13: State St & W Community College Dr 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 13 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 19 49 0 41 23 530 42 51 612 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 19 49 0 41 23 530 42 51 612 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 0 1 20 52 0 43 24 558 44 54 644 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1079 1405 644 1394 1383 304 644 0 0 605 0 0 Stage 1 752 752 - 631 631 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 327 653 - 763 752 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.3 6.5 6.93 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.319 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 186 141 476 111 145 693 951 - - 983 - - Stage 1 405 421 - 440 477 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 665 467 - 400 421 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 164 130 476 99 133 691 951 - - 980 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 164 130 - 99 133 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 395 398 - 428 464 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 608 454 - 361 398 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14 54.5 0.3 0.7

HCM LOS B F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 951 - - 420 162 980 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.05 0.585 0.055 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 - - 14 54.5 8.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B F A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 3.1 0.2 - -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4205 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC
13: State St & W Community College Dr
Base Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 19 49 0 41 23 530 42 51 612 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 19 49 0 41 23 530 42 51 612 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 0 1 20 52 0 43 24 558 44 54 644 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1079 1405 644 1394 1383 304 644 0 0 605 0 0 Stage 1 752 752 - 631 631 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 327 653 - 763 752 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.3 6.5 6.93 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.319 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 186 141 476 111 145 693 951 - - 983 - - Stage 1 405 421 - 440 477 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 665 467 - 400 421 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 164 130 476 99 133 691 951 - - 980 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 164 130 - 99 133 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 395 398 - 428 464 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 608 454 - 361 398 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14 45.9 0.3 0.7

HCM LOS B E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 951 - - 420 99 691 980 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.05 0.521 0.062 0.055 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 - - 14 75.5 10.6 8.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 2.3 0.2 0.2 - -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4206 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: State St & W Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 14 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 139 696 407 106 406 138 359 469 84 198 450 110 Future Volume (veh/h) 139 696 407 106 406 138 359 469 84 198 450 110 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1870 1870 1885 1856 1870 1870 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 148 740 433 113 432 147 382 499 89 211 479 117 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 242 1655 507 202 1601 480 425 1190 532 255 678 164 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.24 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 5147 1576 3456 5147 1544 1781 3554 1588 1795 2843 689 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 148 740 433 113 432 147 382 499 89 211 300 296 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1755 1716 1576 1728 1716 1544 1781 1777 1588 1795 1791 1742 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 12.7 28.8 3.6 7.1 8.1 23.3 12.2 4.4 12.8 17.2 17.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 12.7 28.8 3.6 7.1 8.1 23.3 12.2 4.4 12.8 17.2 17.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 242 1655 507 202 1601 480 425 1190 532 255 427 415 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.45 0.85 0.56 0.27 0.31 0.90 0.42 0.17 0.83 0.70 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 659 1932 592 649 1932 579 573 1810 809 337 672 654 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.6 30.1 35.5 51.3 29.0 29.4 41.3 28.8 26.2 46.7 39.0 39.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.1 9.2 0.9 0.0 0.1 11.6 0.1 0.1 9.4 0.8 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 5.3 12.2 1.6 2.9 3.0 11.5 5.2 1.7 6.3 7.6 7.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.6 30.1 44.8 52.2 29.0 29.5 52.8 28.9 26.3 56.0 39.8 40.3 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1321 692 970 807
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.3 32.9 38.1 44.2
Approach LOS D C D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 40.0 30.7 30.7 11.7 38.8 19.9 41.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 40.0 35.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 30.8 25.3 19.5 6.6 10.1 14.8 14.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.2 0.5 2.4 0.2 2.3 0.1 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.2
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4207 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: State St & Ramona Blvd 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 15 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 41 137 97 73 142 220 83 628 45 201 693 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 41 137 97 73 142 220 83 628 45 201 693 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1885 1885 1870 1900 1870 1870 1885 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 42 141 100 75 146 227 86 647 0 207 714 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 2
Cap, veh/h 89 384 321 132 427 357 143 1129 278 1343
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.32 0.00 0.15 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1586 1795 1885 1575 1810 3647 0 1795 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 42 141 100 75 146 227 86 647 0 207 714 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1586 1795 1885 1575 1810 1777 0 1795 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 4.1 3.4 2.6 4.1 8.3 2.9 9.7 0.0 7.0 9.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 4.1 3.4 2.6 4.1 8.3 2.9 9.7 0.0 7.0 9.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 89 384 321 132 427 357 143 1129 278 1343 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.37 0.31 0.57 0.34 0.64 0.60 0.57 0.74 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1011 1225 1023 1158 1216 1016 1452 2907 1144 2907 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.4 21.9 21.6 28.5 20.6 22.2 28.3 18.1 0.0 25.7 15.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.6 0.5 3.8 0.5 1.9 4.0 0.5 0.0 3.9 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.8 3.0 1.4 3.7 0.0 3.1 3.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.3 22.4 22.1 32.3 21.1 24.1 32.3 18.5 0.0 29.6 15.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C B C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 283 448 733 A 921 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.9 24.5 20.2 18.8
Approach LOS C C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.9 24.2 8.7 16.8 10.0 28.0 7.1 18.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.0 50.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 35.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 11.7 4.6 6.1 4.9 11.9 3.4 10.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 5.1 0.2 1.2 0.2 5.8 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4208 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
16: State St & Cottonwood Ave/N Brinton St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 16 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 120 56 90 15 53 24 87 644 9 26 732 114 Future Volume (veh/h) 120 56 90 15 53 24 87 644 9 26 732 114 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1900 1885 1900 1870 1870 1900 1856 1856 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 128 60 96 16 56 26 93 685 10 28 779 121 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 172 390 327 42 160 74 131 1590 23 64 1268 197 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.45 0.42 0.04 0.41 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1900 1595 1810 1207 561 1810 3555 52 1810 3092 480 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 128 60 96 16 0 82 93 340 355 28 451 449 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1900 1595 1810 0 1768 1810 1763 1844 1810 1791 1781 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 1.4 2.8 0.5 0.0 2.3 2.8 7.3 7.3 0.8 11.0 11.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 1.4 2.8 0.5 0.0 2.3 2.8 7.3 7.3 0.8 11.0 11.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.27
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 172 390 327 42 0 234 131 788 825 64 734 730 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.15 0.29 0.38 0.00 0.35 0.71 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.61 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 811 1037 871 824 0 965 824 1475 1543 824 1499 1490 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 18.1 18.6 26.6 0.0 21.9 25.1 10.5 10.5 26.2 12.9 13.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.2 0.6 2.1 0.0 1.1 2.6 0.4 0.4 1.8 1.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 0.6 1.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.2 2.5 2.6 0.4 3.9 4.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.8 18.3 19.2 28.7 0.0 23.0 27.7 10.9 10.9 27.9 13.9 14.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C A C C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 284 98 788 928
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.4 23.9 12.9 14.4
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.9 28.7 5.3 15.3 8.0 26.7 9.3 11.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s* 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 25 45.0 * 25 * 30 * 25 45.0 * 25 * 30 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 9.3 2.5 4.8 4.8 13.1 5.9 4.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 8.3 0.1 0.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4209 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
17: State St & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 17 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 279 86 106 295 80 81 568 93 100 669 62 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 279 86 106 295 80 81 568 93 100 669 62 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1856 1885 1885 1870 1841 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 64 310 96 118 328 89 90 631 103 111 743 69 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 3 1 1 2 4 2 2 0 2 2
Cap, veh/h 294 640 527 315 660 553 161 1208 197 167 1252 116 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.40 0.37 0.09 0.38 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 983 1900 1565 985 1885 1578 1753 3056 498 1810 3278 304 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 64 310 96 118 328 89 90 366 368 111 403 409 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 983 1900 1565 985 1885 1578 1753 1777 1777 1810 1777 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 9.6 3.2 7.8 10.1 2.9 3.6 11.6 11.8 4.4 13.4 13.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 9.6 3.2 17.4 10.1 2.9 3.6 11.6 11.8 4.4 13.4 13.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 294 640 527 315 660 553 161 703 703 167 679 690 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.48 0.18 0.37 0.50 0.16 0.56 0.52 0.52 0.67 0.59 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 640 1310 1079 649 1300 1088 758 1249 1249 758 1225 1245 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.3 19.4 17.3 25.5 18.9 16.5 32.1 17.0 17.3 32.5 18.3 18.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.8 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.0 4.1 1.1 1.9 4.3 1.0 1.5 4.7 4.7 1.9 5.4 5.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 20.3 17.6 26.5 19.7 16.7 33.3 18.3 18.6 34.2 20.0 20.1 LnGrp LOS C C B C B B C B B C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 470 535 824 923
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.5 20.7 20.1 21.8
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.8 33.3 29.9 10.8 33.3 29.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 * 6 6.0 * 6 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 50.0 * 50 30.0 * 50 49.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 13.8 16.2 5.6 15.4 19.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.6 4.0 0.1 11.8 4.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.8
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4210 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
18: State St & W Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 18 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 84 453 53 134 460 172 80 511 118 209 563 100 Future Volume (veh/h) 84 453 53 134 460 172 80 511 118 209 563 100 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1885 1856 1856 1885 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 487 57 144 495 185 86 549 127 225 605 108 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 3 1 2 2
Cap, veh/h 137 746 87 200 680 253 132 866 200 284 1175 209 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.23 0.22 0.11 0.26 0.25 0.07 0.31 0.29 0.16 0.39 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3250 379 1795 2573 956 1795 2834 653 1795 3013 537 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 270 274 144 346 334 86 341 335 225 356 357 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1805 1824 1795 1805 1724 1795 1763 1724 1795 1777 1772 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 11.1 11.2 6.4 14.3 14.5 3.8 13.6 13.8 9.9 12.5 12.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 11.1 11.2 6.4 14.3 14.5 3.8 13.6 13.8 9.9 12.5 12.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 137 414 419 200 477 456 132 539 527 284 693 691 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.65 0.66 0.72 0.73 0.73 0.65 0.63 0.64 0.79 0.51 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 569 793 801 569 793 757 569 882 862 569 889 886 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.8 28.6 28.7 35.2 27.4 27.8 36.9 24.5 24.7 33.2 19.1 19.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.7 1.9 1.3 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.8 4.8 5.0 2.8 6.2 6.1 1.7 5.9 5.8 4.3 5.2 5.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.8 30.3 30.5 37.0 29.6 30.1 38.9 27.1 27.4 35.1 20.3 20.5 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 634 824 762 938
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.6 31.1 28.6 23.9
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s17.0 29.1 13.1 22.8 10.0 36.0 10.3 25.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.9 15.8 8.4 13.2 5.8 14.6 6.0 16.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 8.3 0.1 3.3 0.1 8.9 0.1 4.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.5
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4211 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
19: San Jacinto Ave/Bergin St & W Ramona Expy 07/25/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 19 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 887 191 33 471 1 180 0 39 1 1 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 1 887 191 33 471 1 180 0 39 1 1 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1900 1856 1856 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1 964 208 36 512 1 196 0 42 1 1 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 3 1805 809 53 1953 4 267 0 263 39 13 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.03 0.54 0.50 0.15 0.00 0.14 0.02 0.01 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3582 1605 1810 3610 7 1795 0 1610 1810 1900 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1 964 208 36 250 263 196 0 42 1 1 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1791 1605 1810 1763 1854 1795 0 1610 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 9.9 4.0 1.1 4.1 4.1 5.6 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 9.9 4.0 1.1 4.1 4.1 5.6 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1805 809 53 954 1003 267 0 263 39 13 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.53 0.26 0.68 0.26 0.26 0.74 0.00 0.16 0.03 0.08 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 822 3120 1398 989 1699 1787 1005 0 925 1040 1063 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.9 9.1 7.6 25.9 6.6 6.6 22.0 0.0 19.8 25.8 26.6 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.3 0.4 0.2 5.5 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 3.1 1.1 0.5 1.2 1.3 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.2 9.4 7.9 31.4 6.8 6.8 23.5 0.0 19.9 25.9 27.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A A C A A C A B C C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1173 549 238 2
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.2 8.4 22.8 26.7
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.6 31.2 4.4 3.6 33.2 12.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 * 4.2 3.5 6.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.0 * 30 25.0 50.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 11.9 2.0 2.0 6.1 7.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4212 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd 07/28/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 17 76 27 37 72 31 7 14 257 200 28 Future Volume (vph) 2 17 76 27 37 72 31 7 14 257 200 28 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.98
Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 1761 1788 1827
Flt Permitted 0.94 0.89 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1674 1579 1788 1827
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 18 80 28 39 76 33 7 15 271 211 29
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 121 0 0 154 0 0 0 286 236 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 3 2 2 10 3 4 10 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 3% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0%
Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Split Split NA
Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 2
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 15.4 15.4 23.0 23.0
Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 16.5 24.6 24.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.26 0.26
Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 291 275 464 475
v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.13
v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.10
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.56 0.62 0.50
Uniform Delay, d1 34.8 35.7 30.8 29.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.6 2.4 0.8
Delay (s) 35.1 37.3 33.3 30.6
Level of Service D D C C
Approach Delay (s) 35.1 37.3 32.0
Approach LOS D D C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 94.6 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4213 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd 07/28/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement SBL SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER SER2
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 216 20 1 6 41 218 5
Future Volume (vph) 5 216 20 1 6 41 218 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1845 1805 1546
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1845 1805 1546
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 227 21 1 6 43 229 5
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 254 0 0 0 49 155 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 10 3 4 2 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot Perm
Protected Phases 3 3 1 1
Permitted Phases 1
Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 15.3 15.3
Effective Green, g (s) 20.6 16.9 16.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.18 0.18
Clearance Time (s) 5.6 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 401 322 276
v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0.10
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.15 0.56
Uniform Delay, d1 33.6 32.8 35.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.1 1.6
Delay (s) 36.0 32.9 37.0
Level of Service D C D
Approach Delay (s) 36.0 36.3
Approach LOS D D
Intersection Summary

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4214 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
21: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 21 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 43 255 166 121 225 33 200 475 128 69 462 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 43 255 166 121 225 33 200 475 128 69 462 28 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 46 274 178 130 242 35 215 511 138 74 497 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 50 479 390 153 964 137 251 655 540 80 867 52 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.31 0.29 0.14 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.25 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1549 1810 3120 443 1810 1885 1525 1795 3425 206 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 274 178 130 137 140 215 511 138 74 259 268 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1549 1810 1791 1773 1810 1885 1525 1795 1791 1840 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 7.4 5.7 4.2 3.4 3.5 6.8 14.3 3.8 2.4 7.4 7.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 7.4 5.7 4.2 3.4 3.5 6.8 14.3 3.8 2.4 7.4 7.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 50 479 390 153 553 548 251 655 540 80 453 466 V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.57 0.46 0.85 0.25 0.26 0.86 0.78 0.26 0.93 0.57 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 753 1333 1087 753 1257 1244 753 1150 940 747 1092 1122 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.6 19.2 18.6 26.6 15.2 15.4 24.8 17.2 13.5 28.0 19.2 19.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.0 0.4 0.3 5.0 0.1 0.1 3.3 0.8 0.1 15.5 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.9 3.0 1.9 1.9 1.3 1.3 3.0 5.6 1.2 1.3 2.9 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.6 19.6 18.9 31.5 15.3 15.5 28.1 18.0 13.6 43.6 19.6 19.7 LnGrp LOS D B B C B B C B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 498 407 864 601
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.2 20.5 19.8 22.6
Approach LOS C C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.6 22.2 6.6 24.4 9.0 18.8 12.2 18.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 5.5 4.4 16.3 6.2 9.4 8.8 9.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.0 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.1
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4215 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
22: San Jacinto Ave & W Esplanade Ave/E Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019 Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 22 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 121 432 227 147 414 77 232 604 109 150 508 88 Future Volume (veh/h) 121 432 227 147 414 77 232 604 109 150 508 88 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 465 244 158 445 83 249 649 117 161 546 95 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 155 665 346 185 936 173 305 1111 484 189 747 130 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.29 0.28 0.10 0.31 0.29 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.25 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 2261 1177 1795 3001 555 1795 3582 1560 1795 3045 528 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 368 341 158 264 264 249 649 117 161 320 321 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1791 1647 1795 1791 1765 1795 1791 1560 1795 1791 1782 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.0 15.6 15.9 7.4 10.2 10.4 11.4 13.0 4.8 7.5 14.0 14.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.0 15.6 15.9 7.4 10.2 10.4 11.4 13.0 4.8 7.5 14.0 14.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 155 527 485 185 559 551 305 1111 484 189 440 437 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.70 0.70 0.85 0.47 0.48 0.82 0.58 0.24 0.85 0.73 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 413 661 608 410 661 651 410 1720 749 410 860 856 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.5 26.8 27.3 37.7 23.7 24.0 34.2 24.8 22.0 37.6 29.6 29.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 1.4 1.7 4.2 0.2 0.2 6.8 0.2 0.1 4.2 0.9 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.8 6.6 6.3 3.4 4.2 4.2 5.4 5.4 1.7 3.5 6.0 6.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.1 28.2 29.0 41.9 23.9 24.2 40.9 25.0 22.1 41.8 30.5 30.7 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 839 686 1015 802
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.9 28.2 28.6 32.8
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.0 30.5 12.8 29.1 18.5 25.0 11.3 30.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 40.0 20.0 30.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.5 15.0 9.4 17.9 13.4 16.2 8.0 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 3.3 0.1 2.5 0.2 2.6 0.1 2.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4216 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
23: S Hewitt St & Main St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 23 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh10.4
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 116 139 128 125 96 125
Future Vol, veh/h 0 116 139 128 125 96 125
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 1 2 1 3 2
Mvmt Flow 0 127 153 141 137 105 137
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 2
HCM Control Delay 10.5 10.1 10.6

HCM LOS B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2
Vol Left, % 43% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 45% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 57% 55% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 221 255 128 125
LT Vol 96 0 128 0
Through Vol 0 116 0 125
RT Vol 125 139 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 243 280 141 137
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.337 0.365 0.231 0.206
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.99 4.694 5.914 5.392
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 714 759 602 659
Service Time 3.061 2.769 3.694 3.172
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.34 0.369 0.234 0.208
HCM Control Delay 10.6 10.5 10.5 9.6
HCM Lane LOS B B B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 1.7 0.9 0.8

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4217 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
24: S Hewitt St & E 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 24 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh17.6
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 199 91 69 135 9 73 162 56 15 213 35 Future Vol, veh/h 52 199 91 69 135 9 73 162 56 15 213 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 56 214 98 74 145 10 78 174 60 16 229 38
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 20.1 15 17.6 16.4

HCM LOS C B C C

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 25% 15% 32% 6%
Vol Thru, % 56% 58% 63% 81%
Vol Right, % 19% 27% 4% 13%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 291 342 213 263
LT Vol 73 52 69 15
Through Vol 162 199 135 213
RT Vol 56 91 9 35
Lane Flow Rate 313 368 229 283
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.562 0.642 0.431 0.514
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.468 6.281 6.774 6.537
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 554 570 527 549
Service Time 4.55 4.358 4.864 4.622
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.565 0.646 0.435 0.515
HCM Control Delay 17.6 20.1 15 16.4
HCM Lane LOS C C B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.5 4.6 2.1 2.9

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4218 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
25: S Hewitt St & E Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 25 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 113 410 156 43 285 30 104 241 63 39 281 130 Future Volume (veh/h) 113 410 156 43 285 30 104 241 63 39 281 130 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1870 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 1856 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 123 446 170 47 310 33 113 262 68 42 305 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 0
Cap, veh/h 188 784 296 111 863 91 176 836 213 104 494 417 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.31 0.29 0.06 0.27 0.25 0.10 0.30 0.28 0.06 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 2537 958 1781 3233 341 1810 2803 713 1767 1900 1605 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 123 314 302 47 169 174 113 164 166 42 305 141 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1791 1705 1781 1777 1797 1810 1777 1739 1767 1900 1605 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 8.7 8.9 1.5 4.5 4.6 3.5 4.2 4.4 1.4 8.3 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 8.7 8.9 1.5 4.5 4.6 3.5 4.2 4.4 1.4 8.3 4.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 188 553 527 111 474 479 176 530 518 104 494 417 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.57 0.57 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.64 0.31 0.32 0.40 0.62 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 791 1245 1185 785 1235 1249 798 1235 1209 779 1321 1115 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 17.1 17.4 26.6 17.5 17.6 25.6 16.0 16.2 26.7 19.2 17.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.8 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 3.4 3.4 0.6 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.7 0.6 3.6 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.8 18.4 18.8 27.6 18.2 18.3 27.1 16.5 16.7 27.7 21.0 18.4 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 739 390 443 488
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.9 19.4 19.3 20.8
Approach LOS B B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.5 21.6 7.7 22.2 9.7 19.3 10.2 19.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 6.4 3.5 10.9 5.5 10.3 5.9 6.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 0.1 3.6 0.1 3.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.9
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4219 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
26: S Hewitt St & E Commonwealth Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 26 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 90 165 140 16 106 14 87 321 38 18 358 93 Future Volume (veh/h) 90 165 140 16 106 14 87 321 38 18 358 93 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 91 167 141 16 107 14 88 324 38 18 362 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Cap, veh/h 261 200 169 106 346 45 678 1361 1159 748 1361 1159 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow, veh/h 1286 947 800 1088 1642 215 942 1885 1606 1035 1885 1606 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 91 0 308 16 0 121 88 324 38 18 362 94 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1286 0 1747 1088 0 1856 942 1885 1606 1035 1885 1606 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.7 0.0 20.1 1.7 0.0 6.6 4.2 6.9 0.8 0.7 7.9 2.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 0.0 20.1 21.8 0.0 6.6 12.1 6.9 0.8 7.6 7.9 2.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 261 0 369 106 0 392 678 1361 1159 748 1361 1159 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.84 0.15 0.00 0.31 0.13 0.24 0.03 0.02 0.27 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 810 0 1114 571 0 1184 678 1361 1159 748 1361 1159 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.7 0.0 45.1 55.5 0.0 39.7 7.8 5.6 4.7 6.8 5.7 4.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 5.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.5 0.0 9.2 0.5 0.0 3.1 0.9 2.6 0.3 0.2 3.0 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.5 0.0 50.2 56.1 0.0 40.1 8.2 6.0 4.8 6.9 6.2 5.0 LnGrp LOS D A D E A D A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 399 137 450 474
Approach Delay, s/veh 49.3 42.0 6.3 6.0
Approach LOS D D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 90.0 29.1 90.0 29.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 85.5 75.5 85.5 75.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.1 22.1 9.9 23.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.8 2.5 2.9 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.3
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4220 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
27: W Ramona Expy & Main St/Lake Park Dr 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 27 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 146 26 287 127 59 42 335 215 83 649 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 146 26 287 127 59 42 335 215 83 649 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1885 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 159 28 312 138 64 46 364 234 90 705 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 245 256 213 449 468 390 104 620 392 143 1130 35 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.30 0.26 0.08 0.32 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1885 1573 1795 1870 1559 1810 2087 1320 1810 3545 111 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 11 159 28 312 138 64 46 309 289 90 356 371 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1885 1573 1795 1870 1559 1810 1777 1630 1810 1791 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 5.4 1.1 10.6 4.0 2.2 1.7 9.9 10.4 3.2 11.4 11.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 5.4 1.1 10.6 4.0 2.2 1.7 9.9 10.4 3.2 11.4 11.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 256 213 449 468 390 104 528 485 143 571 594 V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.62 0.13 0.69 0.29 0.16 0.44 0.58 0.60 0.63 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 834 869 725 1135 1182 986 834 1123 1030 700 999 1040 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.3 27.4 25.6 22.9 20.4 19.7 30.6 20.1 21.1 30.0 19.5 19.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 1.8 0.2 2.8 0.5 0.3 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.2 2.4 0.4 4.5 1.7 0.8 0.7 4.0 4.0 1.4 4.6 4.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.3 29.3 25.8 25.6 20.9 20.0 31.7 21.3 22.5 31.7 20.8 20.9 LnGrp LOS C C C C C B C C C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 198 514 644 817
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.6 23.7 22.6 22.0
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.3 24.0 13.1 7.9 25.4 20.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 41.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 12.4 7.4 3.7 13.4 12.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.9 0.8 0.0 5.5 3.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.2
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4221 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
28: Mountain Ave/Ramona Expy & E 7th St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 28 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 62 2 57 2 6 2 34 505 10 18 903 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 62 2 57 2 6 2 34 505 10 18 903 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1856 1885 1885 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 67 2 62 2 7 2 37 549 11 20 982 55
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 153 9 290 3 140 40 56 1838 37 25 1723 96
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.10 0.07 0.03 0.51 0.48 0.01 0.50 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 51 1567 1810 1421 406 1767 3591 72 1810 3448 193 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 0 64 2 0 9 37 274 286 20 510 527 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1618 1810 0 1827 1767 1791 1872 1810 1791 1850 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1 4.8 4.8 0.6 10.9 11.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1 4.8 4.8 0.6 10.9 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 153 0 299 3 0 179 56 917 958 25 895 924 V/C Ratio(X) 0.44 0.00 0.21 0.61 0.00 0.05 0.67 0.30 0.30 0.81 0.57 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1016 0 956 650 0 709 644 1698 1775 650 1698 1754 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.9 0.0 19.5 27.4 0.0 22.5 26.3 7.7 7.7 27.0 9.6 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.1 52.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.3 0.2 19.8 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 1.5 1.6 0.4 3.6 3.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.6 0.0 19.7 79.4 0.0 22.6 31.3 8.0 8.0 46.8 10.4 10.5 LnGrp LOS C A B E A C C A A D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 131 11 597 1057
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.2 32.9 9.4 11.1
Approach LOS C C A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.4 31.4 8.6 9.4 4.8 32.1 3.9 14.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 6.0 4.8 5.3 3.7 6.0 3.7 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 50.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 31.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 13.0 3.9 2.2 2.6 6.8 2.1 3.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4222 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
29: Ramona Expy & E Esplanade Ave 07/28/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 158 185 126 337 691 254
Future Volume (vph) 158 185 126 337 691 254
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1562 1805 1863 1881 1615
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1562 1805 1863 1881 1615
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 166 195 133 355 727 267
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 164 0 0 0 53
Lane Group Flow (vph) 166 31 133 355 727 214
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 0%
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 5 3 8 4
Permitted Phases 5 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 13.4 13.4 10.7 61.4 46.2 46.2
Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 14.4 11.2 63.9 48.7 48.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.70 0.54 0.54
Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 283 247 222 1312 1009 867
v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.07 0.19 c0.39
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.13
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.13 0.60 0.27 0.72 0.25
Uniform Delay, d1 35.4 32.7 37.6 4.9 15.9 11.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.2 2.9 0.2 2.7 0.2
Delay (s) 38.0 32.9 40.5 5.0 18.6 11.4
Level of Service D C D A B B
Approach Delay (s) 35.2 14.7 16.7
Approach LOS D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.7 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4223 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
30: Soboba Rd & Lake Park Dr 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 30 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 0 70 0 1 0 102 31 1 0 15 254 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 0 70 0 1 0 102 31 1 0 15 254
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1885 1856 1856 1900 1707 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 112 0 77 0 1 0 112 34 1 0 16 279
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 13 0
Cap, veh/h 267 0 236 0 6 0 239 916 27 5 485 458
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.51 0.47 0.00 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 0 1598 0 1900 0 1795 1793 53 1810 1707 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 112 0 77 0 1 0 112 0 35 0 16 279
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1598 0 1900 0 1795 0 1846 1810 1707 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 267 0 236 0 6 0 239 0 943 5 485 458 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 842 0 744 0 332 0 825 0 2239 332 1599 1508 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.3 0.0 13.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 13.8 0.0 4.2 0.0 8.9 10.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 5.7 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.7 0.0 13.4 0.0 22.8 0.0 15.2 0.0 4.2 0.0 8.9 12.2 LnGrp LOS B A B A C A B A A A A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 189 1 147 295
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.6 22.8 12.6 12.1
Approach LOS B C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.8 13.8 3.7 0.0 21.6 9.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 3.7 4.5 5.3 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 30.9 6.3 5.0 40.4 15.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 7.2 2.0 0.0 2.3 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.7
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4224 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC
31: Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 31 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 243 43 57 173 15 53
Future Vol, veh/h 243 43 57 173 15 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 4 4 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 200 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 2 2 2 0 2
Mvmt Flow 264 47 62 188 16 58
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 315 0 604 160
Stage 1 - - - - 292 -
Stage 2 - - - - 312 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.6 6.93
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.219 - 3.5 3.319
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 449 857
Stage 1 - - - - 738 -
Stage 2 - - - - 747 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1239 - 425 854
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 425 -
Stage 1 - - - - 698 -
Stage 2 - - - - 747 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 10.4

HCM LOSB
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 425 854 - - 1239 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.067 - - 0.05 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.8 9.5 - - 8.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0.2 -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4225 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
32: Cawaston Ave & Esplanade Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 32 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.4
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 176 56 99 129 36 51 95 56 13 128 39 Future Vol, veh/h 37 176 56 99 129 36 51 95 56 13 128 39 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 4 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 5
Mvmt Flow 43 202 64 114 148 41 59 109 64 15 147 45
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 3 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 17.1 17.6 11.1 14.3

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 14% 38% 7%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 65% 49% 71%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 21% 14% 22%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 51 95 56 269 264 180
LT Vol 51 0 0 37 99 13
Through Vol 0 95 0 176 129 128
RT Vol 0 0 56 56 36 39
Lane Flow Rate 59 109 64 309 303 207
Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.123 0.213 0.112 0.558 0.562 0.399
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.549 7.02 6.286 6.496 6.663 6.94 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 474 511 569 557 543 517
Service Time 5.301 4.772 4.037 4.209 4.376 4.69
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.124 0.213 0.112 0.555 0.558 0.4
HCM Control Delay 11.4 11.7 9.8 17.1 17.6 14.3
HCM Lane LOS B B A C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.8 0.4 3.4 3.4 1.9

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4226 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
33: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Blvd 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 33 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 123 620 44 212 1114
Future Volume (veh/h) 26 123 620 44 212 1114
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1870 1900 1856 1885
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 126 633 45 216 1137
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 2 0 3 1
Cap, veh/h 181 159 2291 1038 260 2966
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.64 0.64 0.15 0.83
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1598 3647 1610 1767 3676
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 126 633 45 216 1137
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1598 1777 1610 1767 1791
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 8.5 8.5 1.1 13.2 8.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 8.5 8.5 1.1 13.2 8.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 181 159 2291 1038 260 2966
V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.79 0.28 0.04 0.83 0.38
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 229 202 2291 1038 894 4250
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.6 48.7 8.5 7.2 45.9 2.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 15.1 0.3 0.1 6.7 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 4.1 3.2 0.4 6.2 2.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.9 63.8 8.8 7.3 52.6 2.5
LnGrp LOS D E A A D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 153 678 1353
Approach Delay, s/veh 60.6 8.7 10.5
Approach LOS E A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s20.3 75.4 95.7 15.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55.5 70.9 130.9 13.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.2 10.5 10.9 10.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 5.3 11.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.4
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4227 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC
34: Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 34 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 145 11 31 175 20 16 107 20 13 140 92 Future Vol, veh/h 41 145 11 31 175 20 16 107 20 13 140 92 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 9 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 2
Mvmt Flow 44 154 12 33 186 21 17 114 21 14 149 98
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 11 11.4 10.2 11.3

HCM LOS B B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 11% 21% 14% 5%
Vol Thru, % 75% 74% 77% 57%
Vol Right, % 14% 6% 9% 38%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 143 197 226 245
LT Vol 16 41 31 13
Through Vol 107 145 175 140
RT Vol 20 11 20 92
Lane Flow Rate 152 210 240 261
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.232 0.315 0.36 0.374
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.497 5.419 5.386 5.172
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 651 662 668 693
Service Time 3.544 3.461 3.425 3.214
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.233 0.317 0.359 0.377
HCM Control Delay 10.2 11 11.4 11.3
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.7

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4228 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
35: Ramona Expy/Mountain Ave & Hemet St 07/25/2019
Base 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 35 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 103 11 24 9 7 11 31 406 4 12 642 195 Future Volume (veh/h) 103 11 24 9 7 11 31 406 4 12 642 195 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1900 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 106 11 25 9 7 11 32 419 4 12 662 201 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
Cap, veh/h 164 80 183 49 61 97 89 1010 869 55 983 839
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.16 0.14 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.03 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 513 1167 1810 663 1042 1810 1870 1610 1810 1885 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 106 0 36 9 0 18 32 419 4 12 662 201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1680 1810 0 1704 1810 1870 1610 1810 1885 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.6 1.1 8.6 0.1 0.4 16.8 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.6 1.1 8.6 0.1 0.4 16.8 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 164 0 263 49 0 158 89 1010 869 55 983 839 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.14 0.18 0.00 0.11 0.36 0.41 0.00 0.22 0.67 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 724 0 1068 863 0 1214 724 1381 1189 863 1537 1313 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.5 0.0 24.0 30.9 0.0 27.4 29.9 8.9 6.9 30.8 11.5 8.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.7 1.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 3.1 0.0 0.2 6.4 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.1 0.0 24.4 31.6 0.0 27.9 30.8 9.4 6.9 31.5 13.2 8.8 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C C A A C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 142 27 455 875
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.7 29.1 10.9 12.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.0 39.1 5.7 14.2 7.2 37.9 9.9 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 45.0 30.0 40.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 45.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 10.6 2.3 3.2 3.1 18.8 5.7 2.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 12.0 0.1 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4229 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix C
Assumed Future Roadway
Improvements

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4230 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto General Plan Update
Appendix 3: Assumed Future Roadway Improvements
Comparison of 2016 and future baseline 2040 roadway modeled networks Source / Project Capacity Increase reflected
in future year model?
San Jacinto 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program
06-145: Esplanade Avenue widening, 2 to 4 lanes between Warren and Sanderson. Install traffic signal at
Esplanade/Cawston
Yes
07-011: Hewitt Street Rehab – minor widening to
accommodate turn lanes where feasible
No
17-002: Cottonwood widening and sidewalk – install of
sidewalk and widening on Cottonwood Avenue
No
20-006: Lyon Avenue improvements No
WRCOG TUMF Map (Interactive map at this link)
Ramona Expressway:
2 to 4 lanes east of San Jacinto Avenue to City Limits
Yes (See Exhibit A3-2)
Ramona Expressway, Warren to Sanderson, 4 to 6 lanes No Warren from Ramona to Esplanade, 2 to 4 lanes Yes
Hwy 79, from Ramona through city, 0 to 4 lanes (freeway extension)
Yes
Hwy 79, north of city, 4 to 6 lanes Yes
Esplanade from Ramona to Mountain, 0 to 4 lanes No (See Exhibit A3-1)

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4231 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) San Jacinto General Plan Update
Appendix 3: Assumed Future Roadway Improvements
Exhibit A3-1: Esplanade from Ramona to Mountain, Excerpt from TUMF interactive map Exhibit A3-2: Ramona from Main to Cedar, Excerpt from TUMF Interactive Map

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4232 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4 Packet Pg
4 Packet Pg
4 Packet Pg
4 Packet Pg
4 Packet Pg
Appendix D
Cumulative Plus Plan Intersection
Level of Service Worksheets

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4242 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 1: Warren Rd & Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 131 0 2 0 2 362 0 0 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 131 0 2 0 2 362 0 0 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1826 1811 1826 1826 1841 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 138 0 2 0 2 381 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 5 6 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 6 391 174 221 633 564 223 700 625 0 1400 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.39 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3469 1547 1725 1735 1547 1753 1805 1610 0 3800 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 138 0 2 0 2 381 0 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1735 1547 1725 1735 1547 1753 1805 1610 0 1805 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 6 391 174 221 633 564 223 700 625 0 1400 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 313 2188 976 1760 2563 2287 3499 4074 3634 0 8147 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 7.7 0.0 6.1 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 7.7 0.0 6.1 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 140 383 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 14.3 9.5 0.0
Approach LOS B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 7.6 16.5 0.0 15.8 16.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 7.8 6.0 4.6 7.8 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.4 16.6 71.0 5.0 44.0 71.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 8.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4243 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 2: Warren Rd & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 30 23 110 15 17 32 296 98 33 504 97 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 30 23 110 15 17 32 296 98 33 504 97 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1796 1900 1856 1604 1870 1767 1870 1841 1900 1841 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 46 32 24 116 16 18 34 312 103 35 531 102 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 7 0 3 20 2 9 2 4 0 4 0
Cap, veh/h 168 275 247 229 304 301 139 988 434 152 975 449 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1796 1610 1767 1604 1585 1682 3554 1560 1810 3497 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 32 24 116 16 18 34 312 103 35 531 102 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1796 1610 1767 1604 1585 1682 1777 1560 1810 1749 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.7 0.6 2.8 0.4 0.4 0.9 3.1 2.3 0.8 5.8 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.7 0.6 2.8 0.4 0.4 0.9 3.1 2.3 0.8 5.8 2.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 168 275 247 229 304 301 139 988 434 152 975 449 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.12 0.10 0.51 0.05 0.06 0.24 0.32 0.24 0.23 0.54 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 1396 1252 1217 1745 1725 486 4657 2044 523 4583 2110 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 16.4 16.4 18.3 14.9 14.9 19.3 12.9 12.6 19.3 13.8 12.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.7 0.3 1.9 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.3 16.5 16.4 18.9 15.0 15.0 19.7 12.9 12.7 19.6 14.0 12.6 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B B B B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 102 150 449 668
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 18.0 13.4 14.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 16.5 9.8 10.9 7.7 16.6 8.2 12.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 57.0 29.0 33.0 11.0 57.0 15.0 47.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 5.1 4.8 2.7 2.9 7.8 3.1 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4244 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
3: Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh26.2
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 82 181 11 251 121 52 3 187 227 52 345 57 Future Vol, veh/h 82 181 11 251 121 52 3 187 227 52 345 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 1 0 0 100 3 0 3 3 0
Mvmt Flow 86 191 12 264 127 55 3 197 239 55 363 60
Number of Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 18 33.8 28.6 22

HCM LOS C D D C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 3% 0% 48% 0% 81% 0% 23% 0%
Vol Thru, % 97% 29% 52% 89% 19% 54% 77% 75%
Vol Right, % 0% 71% 0% 11% 0% 46% 0% 25%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 97 321 173 102 312 113 225 230
LT Vol 3 0 82 0 251 0 52 0
Through Vol 94 94 91 91 61 61 173 173
RT Vol 0 227 0 11 0 52 0 57
Lane Flow Rate 102 337 182 107 328 118 236 242
Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.291 0.757 0.465 0.266 0.815 0.269 0.571 0.563 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.319 8.076 9.224 8.95 8.943 8.172 8.698 8.397 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 348 449 390 402 407 441 416 430
Service Time 8.066 5.822 6.975 6.7 6.688 5.916 6.447 6.146 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.293 0.751 0.467 0.266 0.806 0.268 0.567 0.563 HCM Control Delay 17.3 32 19.8 14.9 41 13.9 22.5 21.5
HCM Lane LOS C D C B E B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 6.4 2.4 1.1 7.4 1.1 3.5 3.4

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4245 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 5: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 366 54 289 382 297 19 527 156 88 667 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 366 54 289 382 297 19 527 156 88 667 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1900 1870 1900 1870 1885 1900 1856 1826 1841 1856 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 61 385 57 304 402 313 20 555 164 93 702 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 2 0 2 1 0 3 5 4 3 5
Cap, veh/h 238 848 368 397 521 441 147 1531 670 258 1651 722 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 3610 1569 3510 1870 1584 3510 3526 1542 3401 3526 1542 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 61 385 57 304 402 313 20 555 164 93 702 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 1805 1569 1755 1870 1584 1755 1763 1542 1700 1763 1542 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 10.3 3.3 9.5 22.3 20.0 0.6 11.9 7.6 2.9 14.9 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 10.3 3.3 9.5 22.3 20.0 0.6 11.9 7.6 2.9 14.9 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 238 848 368 397 521 441 147 1531 670 258 1651 722 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.45 0.15 0.77 0.77 0.71 0.14 0.36 0.24 0.36 0.43 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 334 1946 846 529 1108 938 280 1531 670 332 1651 722 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.7 37.0 34.3 48.6 37.4 36.6 52.1 21.4 20.2 49.5 19.9 16.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.4 0.2 3.1 2.5 2.1 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 4.6 1.3 4.3 10.5 7.9 0.3 5.0 2.9 1.3 6.2 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.0 37.3 34.5 51.7 39.9 38.7 52.2 22.1 21.1 49.8 20.7 16.3 LnGrp LOS D D C D D D D C C D C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 503 1019 739 820
Approach Delay, s/veh 38.5 43.0 22.7 23.9
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.8 30.5 8.7 56.8 11.8 35.4 12.6 53.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 58.5 8.0 47.5 10.0 64.5 10.0 45.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 12.3 2.6 16.9 3.9 24.3 4.9 13.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 3.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 4.0 0.1 4.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.3
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4246 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 6: Sanderson Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 11
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 89 32 149 96 20 21 844 207 43 996 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 7 89 32 149 96 20 21 844 207 43 996 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1826 1870 1870 1900 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 94 34 157 101 21 22 888 218 45 1048 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 3 3 5 2 2 0 2 0
Cap, veh/h 48 168 61 214 331 69 75 1171 287 111 1542 698 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.22 0.20 0.04 0.42 0.37 0.06 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1311 474 1781 1490 310 1739 2820 692 1810 3554 1608 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 7 0 128 157 0 122 22 559 547 45 1048 22 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1785 1781 0 1800 1739 1777 1735 1810 1777 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 3.9 5.0 0.0 3.3 0.7 15.6 15.8 1.4 13.8 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 3.9 5.0 0.0 3.3 0.7 15.6 15.8 1.4 13.8 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 48 0 229 214 0 400 75 738 720 111 1542 698 V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.00 0.56 0.73 0.00 0.31 0.29 0.76 0.76 0.40 0.68 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 186 0 889 214 0 927 179 824 805 186 1648 746 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 0.0 24.0 24.7 0.0 19.0 27.0 14.5 15.0 26.3 13.2 9.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 2.1 10.8 0.0 0.4 0.8 3.7 3.8 0.9 1.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 1.7 2.6 0.0 1.3 0.3 6.1 6.2 0.6 4.9 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.2 0.0 26.1 35.5 0.0 19.4 27.8 18.2 18.8 27.2 14.3 9.5 LnGrp LOS C A C D A B C B B C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 135 279 1128 1115
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.2 28.5 18.7 14.7
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 28.2 11.0 11.5 6.5 29.3 5.5 16.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 24.5 6.0 28.0 5.0 24.5 5.0 29.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 17.8 7.0 5.9 2.7 15.8 2.2 5.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.4
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4247 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 7: Sanderson Ave & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 134 231 31 146 259 47 95 814 133 168 880 91 Future Volume (veh/h) 134 231 31 146 259 47 95 814 133 168 880 91 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1870 1841 1885 1885 1900 1900 1856 1856 1841 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 141 243 33 154 273 49 100 857 140 177 926 96 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 2 4 1 1 0 0 3 3 4 3 3
Cap, veh/h 196 476 206 210 508 225 149 1283 210 233 1673 746 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.42 0.40 0.13 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3554 1535 1795 3582 1585 1810 3023 494 1753 3526 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 141 243 33 154 273 49 100 500 497 177 926 96 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 1777 1535 1795 1791 1585 1810 1763 1754 1753 1763 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.3 5.3 1.6 6.9 5.9 2.3 4.5 19.0 19.1 8.1 15.6 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 5.3 1.6 6.9 5.9 2.3 4.5 19.0 19.1 8.1 15.6 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 196 476 206 210 508 225 149 748 744 233 1673 746 V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.51 0.16 0.73 0.54 0.22 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.76 0.55 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 452 1194 516 474 1246 551 347 1353 1347 547 3130 1396 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.9 33.6 31.9 35.6 33.2 31.7 37.1 19.3 19.5 34.9 15.6 12.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 1.2 0.5 1.9 1.3 0.7 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.9 0.4 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 2.3 0.6 3.1 2.6 0.9 2.0 7.6 7.6 3.5 5.9 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.8 34.8 32.5 37.4 34.5 32.4 39.1 20.8 21.0 36.8 16.0 12.4 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 417 476 1097 1199
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 35.2 22.5 18.8
Approach LOS D D C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 39.4 13.7 15.2 10.9 43.6 13.1 15.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 62.0 21.0 27.0 15.0 72.0 20.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.1 21.1 8.9 7.3 6.5 17.6 8.3 7.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.3 0.1 2.1 0.0 13.5 0.1 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.7
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4248 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 8: Lyon Ave/Potter Rd & Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 15
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 1068 314 123 1117 4 448 1 194 1 1 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 1068 314 123 1117 4 448 1 194 1 1 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1885 1856 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 418 418 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 1124 331 129 1176 4 472 1 204 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 100 100
Cap, veh/h 9 1681 535 152 2121 669 500 4 791 7 88 78
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.28 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 5025 1598 1767 5106 1610 1810 8 1604 1810 397 354 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 1124 331 129 1176 4 472 0 205 1 1 2 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1675 1598 1767 1702 1610 1810 0 1611 1810 397 354 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 37.2 33.8 14.0 34.0 0.3 49.6 0.0 14.4 0.1 0.4 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 37.2 33.8 14.0 34.0 0.3 49.6 0.0 14.4 0.1 0.4 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 9 1681 535 152 2121 669 500 0 795 7 88 78 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.67 0.62 0.85 0.55 0.01 0.94 0.00 0.26 0.14 0.01 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 56 1681 535 264 2313 729 764 0 795 56 88 78 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 96.2 55.4 54.2 87.5 43.1 33.3 68.8 0.0 28.8 96.4 59.1 59.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.8 2.1 5.3 12.2 0.2 0.0 15.2 0.0 0.8 8.8 0.2 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 16.3 14.6 7.0 14.6 0.1 25.2 0.0 6.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 107.0 57.5 59.6 99.7 43.4 33.3 84.0 0.0 29.5 105.2 59.4 60.1 LnGrp LOS F E E F D C F A C F E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1457 1309 677 4
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.1 48.9 67.5 71.2
Approach LOS E D E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.8 99.8 20.7 69.0 57.7 46.9 5.0 84.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 95.3 28.5 64.5 81.5 19.3 5.5 87.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 16.4 16.0 39.2 51.6 2.9 2.2 36.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.2 10.6 1.6 0.0 0.0 11.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 56.5
HCM 6th LOS E

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4249 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
9: Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 16
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh168.4
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 135 516 57 42 461 15 49 202 46 11 165 125 Future Vol, veh/h 135 516 57 42 461 15 49 202 46 11 165 125 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 1 0 7 2 0
Mvmt Flow 142 543 60 44 485 16 52 213 48 12 174 132
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 227.2 239.3 55 20.2

HCM LOS F F F C

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 16% 100% 0% 8% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 68% 0% 90% 89% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 15% 0% 10% 3% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 297 135 573 518 11 165 125
LT Vol 49 135 0 42 11 0 0
Through Vol 202 0 516 461 0 165 0
RT Vol 46 0 57 15 0 0 125
Lane Flow Rate 313 142 603 545 12 174 132
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.844 0.382 1.526 1.436 0.032 0.451 0.315 Departure Headway (Hd) 11.79 10.749 10.149 10.474 11.684 11.065 10.287 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 310 337 362 354 308 328 351
Service Time 9.49 8.449 7.849 8.174 9.384 8.765 7.987
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.01 0.421 1.666 1.54 0.039 0.53 0.376 HCM Control Delay 55 19.9 276 239.3 14.8 22.5 17.6
HCM Lane LOS F C F F B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 7.3 1.7 30.1 25.9 0.1 2.2 1.3

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4250 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
10: Lyon Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 17
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh21.6
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 83 285 62 4 144 10 72 195 7 16 200 58 Future Vol, veh/h 83 285 62 4 144 10 72 195 7 16 200 58 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 15 3 3 9 0 1 5 6 3 0
Mvmt Flow 87 300 65 4 152 11 76 205 7 17 211 61
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 25.9 16.2 23.5 16

HCM LOS D C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 27% 0% 100% 0% 3% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 73% 0% 0% 82% 91% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 18% 6% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 267 7 83 347 158 16 200 58
LT Vol 72 0 83 0 4 16 0 0
Through Vol 195 0 0 285 144 0 200 0
RT Vol 0 7 0 62 10 0 0 58
Lane Flow Rate 281 7 87 365 166 17 211 61
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Degree of Util (X) 0.63 0.015 0.193 0.748 0.383 0.04 0.47 0.123 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.075 7.229 7.97 7.368 8.28 8.611 8.043 7.269 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 444 492 448 489 432 414 446 490
Service Time 5.862 5.015 5.748 5.146 6.077 6.403 5.834 5.06 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.633 0.014 0.194 0.746 0.384 0.041 0.473 0.124 HCM Control Delay 23.8 10.1 12.7 29.1 16.2 11.8 17.8 11.1 HCM Lane LOS C B B D C B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.2 0 0.7 6.3 1.8 0.1 2.5 0.4

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4251 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 11: Esplanade Ave & Lyon Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 19
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 505 19 71 395 61 27 172 83 56 189 34 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 505 19 71 395 61 27 172 83 56 189 34 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 1900 1900 1870 1900 1900 1885 1900 1870 1885 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 532 20 75 416 64 28 181 87 59 199 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 3
Cap, veh/h 64 711 612 132 779 662 75 333 285 115 377 314 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.42 0.42 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 1870 1610 1810 1870 1590 1810 1885 1610 1781 1885 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 532 20 75 416 64 28 181 87 59 199 36 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1870 1610 1810 1870 1590 1810 1885 1610 1781 1885 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 12.9 0.4 2.1 8.7 1.3 0.8 4.6 2.5 1.7 4.9 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 12.9 0.4 2.1 8.7 1.3 0.8 4.6 2.5 1.7 4.9 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 64 711 612 132 779 662 75 333 285 115 377 314 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.75 0.03 0.57 0.53 0.10 0.37 0.54 0.31 0.51 0.53 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 585 1474 1269 604 1474 1253 604 1666 1423 595 1666 1389 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 14.1 10.2 23.5 11.5 9.3 24.4 19.6 18.8 23.7 18.8 17.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 1.6 0.0 1.4 0.6 0.1 1.1 1.4 0.6 1.3 1.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 4.9 0.1 0.9 3.1 0.4 0.3 1.9 0.9 0.7 2.1 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.9 15.7 10.2 24.9 12.0 9.4 25.6 21.0 19.4 25.0 19.9 17.3 LnGrp LOS C B B C B A C C B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 575 555 296 294
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.9 13.5 21.0 20.6
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.4 13.3 7.8 23.9 6.2 14.5 5.9 25.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 45.0 17.0 40.0 17.0 45.0 17.0 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 6.6 4.1 14.9 2.8 6.9 2.7 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.4 0.0 3.7 0.0 1.3 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4252 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 12: State St & Sagecrest Dr/College Entrance
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 20
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 66 17 206 51 5 11 204 1119 357 69 595 53 Future Volume (vph) 66 17 206 51 5 11 204 1119 357 69 595 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1638 1687 1531 1805 1863 1568 1770 3505 1524 Flt Permitted 0.92 0.24 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1518 432 1531 1805 1863 1568 1770 3505 1524 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 69 18 217 54 5 12 215 1178 376 73 626 56 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 53 0 0 10 0 0 0 59 0 0 25
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 251 0 54 7 0 215 1178 317 73 626 31 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 4 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 6% 0% 14% 0% 2% 1% 2% 3% 6% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 19.1 19.1 19.1 20.2 91.7 91.7 5.0 76.5 76.5 Effective Green, g (s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 22.2 94.7 94.7 7.0 79.5 79.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.67 0.67 0.05 0.56 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 225 64 227 282 1243 1046 87 1963 853 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.12 c0.63 0.04 0.18
v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.13 0.20 0.02
v/c Ratio 1.12 0.84 0.03 0.76 0.95 0.30 0.84 0.32 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 60.4 58.8 51.6 57.3 21.4 9.8 66.9 16.7 14.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 94.8 58.9 0.0 10.4 14.5 0.1 45.8 0.0 0.0 Delay (s) 155.2 117.7 51.7 67.8 35.8 9.9 112.7 16.7 14.0 Level of Service F F D E D A F B B
Approach Delay (s) 155.2 101.9 34.2 25.8
Approach LOS F F C C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 141.9 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4253 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
13: State St & W Community College Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 22
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 20.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 0 23 25 2 90 11 1473 150 73 614 2
Future Vol, veh/h 6 0 23 25 2 90 11 1473 150 73 614 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 11 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 7 0 0 2 40 1 1 0 3 0
Mvmt Flow 6 0 24 26 2 95 12 1551 158 77 646 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1603 2546 325 2142 2469 866 650 0 0 1720 0 0 Stage 1 802 802 - 1665 1665 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 801 1744 - 477 804 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 7.04 7.5 6.5 6.94 4.9 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.37 3.5 4 3.32 2.6 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 72 27 656 28 31 297 716 - - 373 - -
Stage 1 348 399 - 103 155 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 349 142 - 543 398 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 38 21 655 ~ 22 24 294 715 - - 369 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 38 21 - ~ 22 24 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 341 315 - 100 151 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 229 138 - 414 314 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 35 $ 414.3 0.1 1.8

HCM LOS E F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 715 - - 150 77 369 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.204 1.599 0.208 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 35$ 414.3 17.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - E F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.7 10.3 0.8 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4254 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
13: State St & W Community College Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 0 23 25 2 90 11 1473 150 73 614 2
Future Vol, veh/h 6 0 23 25 2 90 11 1473 150 73 614 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 11 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 7 0 0 2 40 1 1 0 3 0
Mvmt Flow 6 0 24 26 2 95 12 1551 158 77 646 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1603 2546 325 2142 2469 866 650 0 0 1720 0 0 Stage 1 802 802 - 1665 1665 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 801 1744 - 477 804 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 7.04 7.5 6.5 6.94 4.9 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.37 3.5 4 3.32 2.6 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 72 27 656 28 31 297 716 - - 373 - -
Stage 1 348 399 - 103 155 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 349 142 - 543 398 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 38 21 655 ~ 22 24 294 715 - - 369 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 38 21 - ~ 22 24 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 341 315 - 100 151 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 229 138 - 414 314 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 35 144.5 0.1 1.8

HCM LOS E F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 715 - - 150 22 294 369 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.204 1.292 0.322 0.208 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 35$ 549.6 23 17.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - E F C C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.7 3.7 1.4 0.8 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4255 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 14: State St & W Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 24
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 255 687 547 384 1124 630 284 733 142 157 472 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 255 687 547 384 1124 630 284 733 142 157 472 63 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1841 1841 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 268 723 576 404 1183 663 299 772 149 165 497 66 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 4 4 2 2 0 1 1 2 3 2 2
Cap, veh/h 339 1819 564 476 2054 647 334 973 424 201 628 83 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.36 0.36 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.19 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.20 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 3483 5025 1559 3456 5106 1609 1795 3582 1561 1767 3153 417 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 268 723 576 404 1183 663 299 772 149 165 279 284 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1742 1675 1559 1728 1702 1609 1795 1791 1561 1767 1777 1794 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.5 14.9 50.4 15.9 25.1 56.0 22.6 27.9 10.7 12.7 20.8 21.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.5 14.9 50.4 15.9 25.1 56.0 22.6 27.9 10.7 12.7 20.8 21.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 1819 564 476 2054 647 334 973 424 201 354 357 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.40 1.02 0.85 0.58 1.02 0.90 0.79 0.35 0.82 0.79 0.79 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 1819 564 546 2054 647 413 1184 516 305 485 490 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.4 33.1 44.4 58.6 32.4 41.6 55.3 47.1 40.8 60.3 52.9 53.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.6 0.1 43.3 9.6 0.3 41.6 16.7 2.5 0.2 6.0 4.0 4.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.1 6.1 26.0 7.6 10.4 29.4 11.8 12.8 4.2 6.0 9.7 9.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 70.1 33.1 87.7 68.2 32.6 83.2 72.0 49.6 41.0 66.3 56.9 57.5 LnGrp LOS E C F E C F E D D E E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1567 2250 1220 728
Approach Delay, s/veh 59.5 53.9 54.0 59.3
Approach LOS E D D E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.2 54.4 29.9 31.7 17.6 60.0 19.8 41.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.0 47.0 31.0 36.0 14.0 54.0 23.0 44.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.9 52.4 24.6 23.0 12.5 58.0 14.7 29.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 56.1
HCM 6th LOS E

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4256 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 15: State St & Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 26
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 184 126 280 114 232 49 902 209 161 1136 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 184 126 280 114 232 49 902 209 161 1136 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1796 1885 1900 1885 1900 1885 1870 1870 1870 1781 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 194 133 295 120 244 52 949 0 169 1196 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 8 3 3
Cap, veh/h 67 373 302 342 664 545 81 1286 204 1510
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.36 0.00 0.12 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1711 1885 1525 1795 1900 1561 1781 3647 0 1697 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 194 133 295 120 244 52 949 0 169 1196 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1711 1885 1525 1795 1900 1561 1781 1777 0 1697 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 11.4 9.5 19.7 5.4 14.9 3.5 28.7 0.0 12.0 36.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 11.4 9.5 19.7 5.4 14.9 3.5 28.7 0.0 12.0 36.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 67 373 302 342 664 545 81 1286 204 1510 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.52 0.44 0.86 0.18 0.45 0.64 0.74 0.83 0.79 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 175 458 370 640 944 776 173 2359 412 2826 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.7 44.3 43.5 48.5 27.9 31.0 57.9 34.3 0.0 53.1 30.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.7 1.1 1.0 6.5 0.1 0.6 8.1 0.8 0.0 8.3 1.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 5.4 3.7 9.4 2.5 5.7 1.8 12.5 0.0 5.6 15.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 71.4 45.4 44.5 55.0 28.0 31.6 66.0 35.2 0.0 61.3 31.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D D C C E D E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 374 659 1001 A 1365 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.4 41.4 36.8 35.2
Approach LOS D D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.9 48.7 27.5 28.5 10.6 56.9 8.8 47.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 80.0 43.0 29.0 11.0 97.0 12.1 60.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 30.7 21.7 13.4 5.5 38.2 5.4 16.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 8.7 0.8 1.4 0.0 12.7 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.3
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4257 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 16: State St & Cottonwood Ave/N Brinton St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 28
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 276 144 98 17 103 22 65 815 10 17 1015 261 Future Volume (veh/h) 276 144 98 17 103 22 65 815 10 17 1015 261 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1826 1900 1900 1796 1796 1870 1870 1870 1900 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 291 152 103 18 108 23 68 858 11 18 1068 275 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 5 0 0 7 7 2 2 2 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 325 522 456 39 178 38 91 1860 24 39 1352 346 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.52 0.51 0.02 0.49 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1826 1597 1810 1430 304 1781 3591 46 1810 2767 707 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 291 152 103 18 0 131 68 425 444 18 678 665 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1826 1597 1810 0 1734 1781 1777 1860 1810 1763 1711 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.6 6.8 5.1 1.0 0.0 7.5 3.9 15.8 15.8 1.0 33.3 34.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.6 6.8 5.1 1.0 0.0 7.5 3.9 15.8 15.8 1.0 33.3 34.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.41
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 325 522 456 39 0 216 91 920 963 39 861 836 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.29 0.23 0.46 0.00 0.61 0.75 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.79 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 512 833 729 99 0 387 154 1157 1211 99 1092 1060 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.6 29.0 28.4 50.4 0.0 43.3 48.8 15.9 15.9 50.4 22.2 22.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 0.4 0.3 3.2 0.0 3.3 4.6 0.4 0.4 3.2 3.3 3.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 3.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 3.4 1.9 6.3 6.6 0.5 13.9 13.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.8 29.4 28.7 53.6 0.0 46.5 53.4 16.4 16.3 53.6 25.4 26.2 LnGrp LOS D C C D A D D B B D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 546 149 937 1361
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.2 47.4 19.0 26.2
Approach LOS D D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 58.0 6.2 33.8 9.3 54.9 23.1 17.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 5.5 66.6 * 5.5 * 47 * 8.8 63.3 * 30 * 23 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 17.8 3.0 8.8 5.9 36.0 18.6 9.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 13.6 0.2 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4258 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 17: State St & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 30
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 149 62 97 120 93 21 710 32 59 1150 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 69 149 62 97 120 93 21 710 32 59 1150 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1900 1826 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 157 65 102 126 98 22 747 34 62 1211 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 1 1 0 5 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 261 394 333 257 419 352 81 2021 92 100 2026 82 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.58 0.56 0.06 0.58 0.57 Sat Flow, veh/h 1156 1870 1583 1167 1885 1587 1739 3457 157 1781 3477 141 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 157 65 102 126 98 22 384 397 62 618 642 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1156 1870 1583 1167 1885 1587 1739 1777 1837 1781 1777 1841 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 6.3 3.0 7.1 4.9 4.5 1.1 10.0 10.0 3.0 19.5 19.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.8 6.3 3.0 13.4 4.9 4.5 1.1 10.0 10.0 3.0 19.5 19.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 261 394 333 257 419 352 81 1039 1074 100 1035 1072 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.40 0.19 0.40 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.37 0.37 0.62 0.60 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 507 792 670 492 798 672 179 1667 1724 306 1789 1853 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.3 29.7 28.4 34.6 28.3 28.2 40.2 9.6 9.7 40.4 11.7 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.9 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 2.3 1.2 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 2.9 1.1 2.1 2.2 1.7 0.5 3.7 3.8 1.4 7.2 7.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.1 30.7 28.8 36.0 28.9 28.8 40.9 10.1 10.1 42.7 12.9 12.9 LnGrp LOS C C C D C C D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 295 326 803 1322
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.1 31.1 10.9 14.3
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 55.1 23.4 8.1 55.9 23.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 * 6 6.0 * 6 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 80.0 * 36 7.0 * 87 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 12.0 11.8 3.1 21.5 15.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.0 2.0 0.0 28.4 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4259 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 18: State St & W Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 32
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 502 109 20 290 28 170 665 122 169 749 273 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 502 109 20 290 28 170 665 122 169 749 273 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1870 1826 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 94 528 115 21 305 29 179 700 128 178 788 287 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 5 2 2
Cap, veh/h 137 688 149 57 634 60 226 1328 243 225 1132 412 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.24 0.23 0.03 0.19 0.18 0.13 0.44 0.43 0.13 0.44 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 2899 628 1781 3274 309 1753 2993 547 1739 2550 928 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 94 323 320 21 164 170 179 415 413 178 549 526 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1777 1750 1781 1777 1806 1753 1777 1763 1739 1777 1702 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 17.1 17.3 1.2 8.3 8.5 10.0 17.2 17.3 10.1 25.2 25.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 17.1 17.3 1.2 8.3 8.5 10.0 17.2 17.3 10.1 25.2 25.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.55
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 137 422 415 57 344 350 226 788 782 225 789 755 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.77 0.77 0.37 0.48 0.48 0.79 0.53 0.53 0.79 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 268 649 639 105 491 499 433 1070 1061 429 1070 1025 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.7 36.0 36.2 48.0 36.3 36.4 42.8 20.5 20.6 42.8 22.7 22.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 2.9 3.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 2.4 1.2 1.2 2.4 2.4 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 7.7 7.7 0.5 3.7 3.8 4.5 7.2 7.2 4.4 10.7 10.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.9 38.9 39.3 49.5 37.3 37.5 45.2 21.6 21.8 45.2 25.1 25.5 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 737 355 1007 1253
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.3 38.1 25.9 28.1
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.1 48.9 7.2 28.0 17.1 49.0 11.7 23.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 60.0 5.0 36.0 24.0 60.0 14.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.1 19.3 3.2 19.3 12.0 27.3 7.1 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.9 0.0 3.7 0.1 16.6 0.0 1.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.2
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4260 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 19: San Jacinto Ave/Bergin St & W Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 34
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1073 290 221 1939 0 329 1 201 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1073 290 221 1939 0 329 1 201 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1885 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1129 305 233 2041 0 346 1 212 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 2 1782 820 258 2499 0 387 2 356 2 2 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.14 0.70 0.00 0.21 0.22 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3469 1596 1795 3676 0 1810 8 1604 1810 1900 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1129 305 233 2041 0 346 0 213 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1735 1596 1795 1791 0 1810 0 1611 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 23.3 11.4 12.7 39.8 0.0 18.5 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 23.3 11.4 12.7 39.8 0.0 18.5 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2 1782 820 258 2499 0 387 0 358 2 2 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.63 0.37 0.90 0.82 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 82 2007 923 379 2667 0 441 0 405 637 654 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 17.4 14.5 41.9 10.6 0.0 38.0 0.0 35.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.7 0.4 14.2 2.1 0.0 17.4 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 9.0 4.1 6.6 13.7 0.0 9.9 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 18.1 14.9 56.0 12.7 0.0 55.4 0.0 36.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B B E B A E A D A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1434 2274 559 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.4 17.1 48.0 0.0
Approach LOS B B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.3 55.0 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 * 4.2 3.5 6.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 55.5 * 34 5.0 72.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.7 25.3 0.0 0.0 41.8 20.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 16.1 0.0 0.0 25.5 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4261 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 18 54 41 29 93 41 6 7 450 161 5
Future Volume (vph) 2 18 54 41 29 93 41 6 7 450 161 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1727 1738 1770 3556
Flt Permitted 0.87 0.91 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1509 1590 1770 3556
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 19 57 43 31 98 43 6 7 474 169 5
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 108 0 0 177 0 0 0 481 173 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 5 4 4 2 5 9 2 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 6% 0% 14% 0% 0% 17% 0% 2% 1% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Split Split NA
Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 2
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 39.5 39.5
Effective Green, g (s) 19.2 19.2 41.1 41.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.33 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 246 587 1179
v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 0.05
v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.11
v/c Ratio 0.46 0.72 0.82 0.15
Uniform Delay, d1 47.7 49.8 38.0 29.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 8.5 8.7 0.1
Delay (s) 48.2 58.3 46.7 29.1
Level of Service D E D C
Approach Delay (s) 48.2 58.3 42.1
Approach LOS D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 123.9 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4262 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
Movement SBL SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 258 28 2 1 44 164
Future Volume (vph) 3 258 28 2 1 44 164
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1857 1770 1498
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1857 1770 1498
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 272 29 2 1 46 173
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 306 0 0 0 47 173
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 9 2 5 6 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 6%
Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot Perm
Protected Phases 3 3 1 1
Permitted Phases 1
Actuated Green, G (s) 24.6 19.8 19.8
Effective Green, g (s) 26.2 21.4 21.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.17 0.17
Clearance Time (s) 5.6 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 392 305 258
v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0.12
v/c Ratio 0.78 0.15 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 46.1 43.6 48.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 0.1 5.3
Delay (s) 55.1 43.6 53.2
Level of Service E D D
Approach Delay (s) 55.1 51.2
Approach LOS E D
Intersection Summary

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4263 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 21: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 39
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 202 77 77 268 118 76 637 70 59 598 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 202 77 77 268 118 76 637 70 59 598 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1856 1900 1885 1885 1885 1870 1885 1870 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 213 81 81 282 124 80 671 74 62 629 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 4 4
Cap, veh/h 37 369 303 88 546 233 86 790 666 63 2011 99
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.23 0.20 0.05 0.42 0.43 0.04 0.41 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1870 1538 1810 2426 1036 1795 1870 1549 1781 4902 240 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 213 81 81 206 200 80 671 74 62 429 231 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1870 1538 1810 1791 1671 1795 1870 1549 1781 1675 1792 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 5.6 2.4 2.4 5.4 5.7 2.4 17.4 1.5 1.9 4.7 4.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 5.6 2.4 2.4 5.4 5.7 2.4 17.4 1.5 1.9 4.7 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 37 369 303 88 403 376 86 790 666 63 1374 735 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.58 0.27 0.93 0.51 0.53 0.93 0.85 0.11 0.98 0.31 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 235 1047 861 436 1201 1121 433 2496 2078 363 4346 2325 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 19.6 18.4 25.6 18.3 18.8 25.6 14.0 9.2 26.0 10.8 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 26.7 0.5 0.2 14.3 0.4 0.4 15.2 1.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 2.3 0.8 1.3 2.1 2.1 1.3 6.3 0.4 1.2 1.5 1.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.1 20.2 18.5 39.9 18.7 19.2 40.8 15.0 9.2 53.0 10.8 10.9 LnGrp LOS D C B D B B D B A D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 328 487 825 722
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.2 22.4 17.0 14.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.1 16.1 5.9 26.8 6.6 14.6 6.6 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 34.9 11.5 71.1 13.5 28.9 13.5 69.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 7.7 3.9 19.4 4.4 7.6 4.4 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.2
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4264 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 22: San Jacinto Ave & W Esplanade Ave/E Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 41
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 453 195 72 191 62 114 403 71 162 443 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 453 195 72 191 62 114 403 71 162 443 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1841 1841 1870 1856 1856 1811 1856 1841 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 477 205 76 201 65 120 424 75 171 466 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 4 4 2 3 3 6 3 4 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 136 692 295 86 685 215 365 1112 490 204 704 78 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.29 0.27 0.05 0.26 0.24 0.21 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.22 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 2383 1017 1781 2629 823 1725 3526 1553 1810 3247 361 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 349 333 76 133 133 120 424 75 171 256 262 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 1749 1652 1781 1763 1690 1725 1763 1553 1810 1791 1817 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 12.1 12.4 2.9 4.1 4.4 4.0 6.4 2.4 6.4 9.0 9.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 12.1 12.4 2.9 4.1 4.4 4.0 6.4 2.4 6.4 9.0 9.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 136 508 479 86 460 440 365 1112 490 204 388 394 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.69 0.69 0.88 0.29 0.30 0.33 0.38 0.15 0.84 0.66 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 482 1020 963 363 899 862 503 1722 758 633 979 993 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.2 21.6 22.1 32.4 20.3 20.7 22.9 18.3 16.9 29.8 24.6 24.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.6 0.7 10.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 3.5 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 4.7 4.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 2.5 0.8 2.8 3.7 3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.7 22.2 22.8 42.8 20.4 20.8 23.1 18.3 16.9 33.4 25.3 25.4 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C C B B C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 797 342 619 689
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.5 25.5 19.1 27.3
Approach LOS C C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 25.6 7.3 23.9 18.5 18.9 9.4 21.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.5 32.5 14.5 38.5 20.5 36.5 19.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 8.4 4.9 14.4 6.0 11.1 6.5 6.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 2.0 0.0 2.9 0.1 2.1 0.1 1.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4265 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
23: S Hewitt St & Main St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 42
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 188 108 131 217 113 93
Future Vol, veh/h 0 188 108 131 217 113 93
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 5 3 2 1
Mvmt Flow 0 198 114 138 228 119 98
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 2
HCM Control Delay 11.5 10.9 10.9

HCM LOS B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2
Vol Left, % 55% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 64% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 45% 36% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 206 296 131 217
LT Vol 113 0 131 0
Through Vol 0 188 0 217
RT Vol 93 108 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 217 312 138 228
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.32 0.42 0.228 0.344
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.313 4.857 5.959 5.42
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 670 732 597 658
Service Time 3.402 2.942 3.75 3.21
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.324 0.426 0.231 0.347
HCM Control Delay 10.9 11.5 10.5 11.1
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 2.1 0.9 1.5

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4266 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
24: S Hewitt St & E 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 43
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh31.4
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 218 69 58 240 49 114 51 78 38 318 35 Future Vol, veh/h 28 218 69 58 240 49 114 51 78 38 318 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 3 0 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 29 229 73 61 253 52 120 54 82 40 335 37
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 27.6 31.8 21.1 40.4

HCM LOS D D C E

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 47% 9% 17% 10%
Vol Thru, % 21% 69% 69% 81%
Vol Right, % 32% 22% 14% 9%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 243 315 347 391
LT Vol 114 28 58 38
Through Vol 51 218 240 318
RT Vol 78 69 49 35
Lane Flow Rate 256 332 365 412
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.567 0.709 0.769 0.852
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.976 7.697 7.579 7.451
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 450 468 475 486
Service Time 6.057 5.773 5.652 5.519
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 0.709 0.768 0.848
HCM Control Delay 21.1 27.6 31.8 40.4
HCM Lane LOS C D D E
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.4 5.5 6.7 8.7

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4267 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 25: S Hewitt St & E Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 45
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 55 316 97 60 266 64 61 171 32 58 245 91 Future Volume (veh/h) 55 316 97 60 266 64 61 171 32 58 245 91 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1870 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 58 333 102 63 280 67 64 180 34 61 258 96 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 3
Cap, veh/h 138 706 213 146 759 178 145 719 133 141 599 217 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.26 0.24 0.08 0.27 0.25 0.08 0.24 0.22 0.08 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2681 807 1810 2847 669 1781 3014 558 1781 2531 917 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 219 216 63 173 174 64 105 109 61 178 176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1711 1810 1777 1739 1781 1791 1781 1781 1763 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 4.9 5.1 1.6 3.7 3.9 1.6 2.3 2.4 1.5 4.0 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 4.9 5.1 1.6 3.7 3.9 1.6 2.3 2.4 1.5 4.0 4.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.54
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 138 468 451 146 474 463 145 427 425 141 417 399 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.47 0.48 0.43 0.36 0.38 0.44 0.25 0.26 0.43 0.43 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 753 1764 1699 803 1802 1763 828 1702 1693 790 1638 1566 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.8 14.6 14.9 20.7 14.1 14.3 20.7 14.6 14.7 20.8 15.3 15.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 1.8 1.8 0.6 1.4 1.4 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.5 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.6 15.7 16.0 21.5 14.8 15.0 21.5 15.0 15.2 21.5 16.3 16.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 493 410 278 415
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.5 15.9 16.6 17.2
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 15.3 7.8 16.5 7.8 15.2 7.7 16.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 44.0 20.0 46.0 21.0 43.0 19.0 47.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 4.4 3.6 7.1 3.6 6.2 3.5 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.0 4.2 0.0 3.3 0.0 3.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.5
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4268 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 26: S Hewitt St & E Commonwealth Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 47
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 12 38 15 26 66 10 44 224 58 21 310 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 12 38 15 26 66 10 44 224 58 21 310 63 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1841 1841 1870 1900 1900 1900 1885 1900 1737 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 13 40 16 27 69 11 46 236 61 22 326 66 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 4 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 11 2 0
Cap, veh/h 104 101 40 119 130 21 889 1622 1384 897 1609 1384 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Sat Flow, veh/h 1295 1240 496 1323 1595 254 1007 1885 1608 1004 1870 1608 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 13 0 56 27 0 80 46 236 61 22 326 66 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1295 0 1736 1323 0 1850 1007 1885 1608 1004 1870 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 4.2 2.7 0.0 5.7 1.1 2.7 0.8 0.5 4.0 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 4.2 6.9 0.0 5.7 5.2 2.7 0.8 3.2 4.0 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 104 0 141 119 0 150 889 1622 1384 897 1609 1384 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.40 0.23 0.00 0.53 0.05 0.15 0.04 0.02 0.20 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 414 0 557 436 0 593 889 1622 1384 897 1609 1384 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 63.9 0.0 59.9 63.1 0.0 60.5 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 1.8 0.9 0.0 2.9 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 1.9 0.9 0.0 2.8 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.4 0.0 61.7 64.0 0.0 63.4 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.5 LnGrp LOS E A E E A E A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 69 107 343 414
Approach Delay, s/veh 62.2 63.6 1.7 1.8
Approach LOS E E A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 122.0 15.1 122.0 15.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 117.5 43.5 117.5 43.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 9.0 6.0 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.9 0.3 2.5 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.3
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4269 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 27: W Ramona Expy & Main St/Lake Park Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 49
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 53 86 65 108 121 66 85 1202 130 53 624 75 Future Volume (veh/h) 53 86 65 108 121 66 85 1202 130 53 624 75 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1870 1841 1856 1870 1900 1885 1885 1870 1826 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 91 68 114 127 69 89 1265 137 56 657 79 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 2 4 3 2 0 1 1 2 5 5
Cap, veh/h 160 161 140 203 215 181 135 1819 196 96 1676 201 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.56 0.53 0.05 0.54 0.51 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1826 1585 1753 1856 1563 1810 3261 352 1781 3119 375 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 91 68 114 127 69 89 693 709 56 365 371 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1826 1585 1753 1856 1563 1810 1791 1822 1781 1735 1758 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 4.2 3.6 5.4 5.7 3.6 4.2 24.3 24.7 2.7 10.7 10.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.5 4.2 3.6 5.4 5.7 3.6 4.2 24.3 24.7 2.7 10.7 10.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 160 161 140 203 215 181 135 999 1016 96 932 945 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.57 0.49 0.56 0.59 0.38 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.58 0.39 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 457 462 401 423 448 377 353 1832 1863 205 1635 1657 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.3 38.1 37.8 36.4 36.5 35.6 39.2 13.9 14.1 40.2 11.8 12.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 2.3 1.9 3.4 3.6 1.9 2.0 1.1 1.1 2.0 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 1.9 1.4 2.4 2.7 1.4 1.9 9.1 9.5 1.2 3.9 4.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.3 40.4 39.7 39.8 40.1 37.4 41.2 14.9 15.2 42.2 12.1 12.3 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 215 310 1491 792
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.6 39.4 16.6 14.3
Approach LOS D D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 52.6 11.7 10.5 50.8 14.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 86.5 21.0 16.0 79.5 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 26.7 6.2 6.2 12.9 7.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 19.4 0.5 0.0 6.9 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.3
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4270 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 28: Mountain Ave/Ramona Expy & E 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 51
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 112 1 78 4 0 0 66 1382 0 5 719 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 112 1 78 4 0 0 66 1382 0 5 719 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 1826 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 118 1 82 4 0 0 69 1455 0 5 757 64
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 5
Cap, veh/h 171 2 167 4 21 0 89 2356 0 3 1988 168
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.58 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 19 1594 1810 1900 0 1810 3676 0 1810 3238 274 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 118 0 83 4 0 0 69 1455 0 5 405 416 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1613 1810 1900 0 1810 1791 0 1810 1735 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 0.0 3.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.6 16.0 0.0 0.1 8.0 8.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 0.0 3.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.6 16.0 0.0 0.1 8.0 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 171 0 169 4 21 0 89 2356 0 3 1065 1091 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.49 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.62 0.00 1.89 0.38 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 457 0 1018 151 871 0 313 3740 0 98 1613 1652 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.9 0.0 29.5 34.1 0.0 0.0 32.1 6.7 0.0 34.1 6.6 6.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.0 0.8 160.8 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.4 0.0 492.6 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 4.5 0.0 0.4 2.4 2.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.7 0.0 30.3 194.9 0.0 0.0 37.4 7.1 0.0 526.7 7.0 7.0 LnGrp LOS C A C F A A D A A F A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 201 4 1524 826
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.1 194.9 8.5 10.1
Approach LOS C F A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 45.9 10.6 4.8 4.1 48.9 4.1 11.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 6.0 4.8 5.3 3.7 6.0 3.7 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.8 61.5 16.7 30.0 4.0 69.3 6.0 41.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 10.1 6.4 0.0 2.1 18.0 2.1 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 24.9 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4271 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 29: Ramona Expy & E Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 52
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 468 0 126 0 0 0 226 219 0 0 86 267 Future Volume (vph) 468 0 126 0 0 0 226 219 0 0 86 267
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3308 1787 3539 3374 1599
Flt Permitted 0.75 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 2588 1787 3539 3374 1599
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 493 0 133 0 0 0 238 231 0 0 91 281
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 253
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 606 0 0 0 0 238 231 0 0 91 28
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 7% 1%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 6 3 8 4
Permitted Phases 6 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 92.3 17.8 33.6 11.3 11.3
Effective Green, g (s) 92.3 18.3 36.1 13.8 13.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.13 0.26 0.10 0.10
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 1.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1744 238 933 340 161
v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.07 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.02
v/c Ratio 8.08dl 1.00 0.25 0.27 0.18
Uniform Delay, d1 9.5 59.3 39.7 56.9 56.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 58.3 0.2 0.6 0.7
Delay (s) 9.6 117.6 39.9 57.5 57.1
Level of Service A F D E E
Approach Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 79.3 57.2
Approach LOS A A E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 44.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 136.9 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4272 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 30: Soboba Rd & Lake Park Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 55
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 193 3 97 3 2 0 176 23 0 0 128 4
Future Volume (veh/h) 193 3 97 3 2 0 176 23 0 0 128 4
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1781 1900 1900 1900 1826 1841 1841 1900 1826 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 203 3 102 3 2 0 185 24 0 0 135 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 4 4 0 5 2
Cap, veh/h 345 5 292 3 2 0 305 866 0 5 375 326
Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1784 26 1510 1107 738 0 1739 1841 0 1810 1826 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 206 0 102 5 0 0 185 24 0 0 135 4
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1811 0 1510 1845 0 0 1739 1841 0 1810 1826 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.1 Prop In Lane 0.99 1.00 0.60 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 350 0 292 5 0 0 305 866 0 5 375 326 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.00 0.35 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.01 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1019 0 850 260 0 0 920 2005 0 321 1346 1169 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.0 0.0 12.4 17.8 0.0 0.0 13.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 12.1 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.3 101.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.6 0.0 12.7 119.5 0.0 0.0 15.5 5.1 0.0 0.0 12.8 11.3 LnGrp LOS B A B F A A B A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 308 5 209 139
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 119.5 14.3 12.8
Approach LOS B F B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 11.3 3.9 0.0 20.7 10.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 3.7 4.5 5.3 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 24.9 5.3 5.0 37.4 19.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 4.3 2.1 0.0 2.2 5.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.3
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4273 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
31: Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 56
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 257 24 62 79 19 92
Future Vol, veh/h 257 24 62 79 19 92
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 200 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 11 0 5 10 1
Mvmt Flow 271 25 65 83 20 97
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 298 0 499 150
Stage 1 - - - - 286 -
Stage 2 - - - - 213 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.75 6.915
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.95 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.595 3.3095
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1275 - 499 873
Stage 1 - - - - 718 -
Stage 2 - - - - 801 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1273 - 473 871
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 473 -
Stage 1 - - - - 717 -
Stage 2 - - - - 760 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.5 10.2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 473 871 - - 1273 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 0.111 - - 0.051 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 9.7 - - 8 -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.4 - - 0.2 -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4274 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
32: Cawston Ave & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 57
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 54.4
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 221 177 204 237 15 73 80 129 9 129 61 Future Vol, veh/h 59 221 177 204 237 15 73 80 129 9 129 61 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 1 0 1 8 2 3 1 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 62 233 186 215 249 16 77 84 136 9 136 64
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 3 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 64.5 84.1 14.2 19.9

HCM LOS F F B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 13% 45% 5%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 48% 52% 65%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 39% 3% 31%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 73 80 129 457 456 199
LT Vol 73 0 0 59 204 9
Through Vol 0 80 0 221 237 129
RT Vol 0 0 129 177 15 61
Lane Flow Rate 77 84 136 481 480 209
Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.194 0.202 0.298 0.983 1.05 0.49
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.425 8.922 8.159 7.593 7.877 8.901 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 383 405 443 481 461 408
Service Time 7.125 6.622 5.859 5.293 5.623 6.601
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.201 0.207 0.307 1 1.041 0.512
HCM Control Delay 14.4 13.9 14.3 64.5 84.1 19.9
HCM Lane LOS B B B F F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 0.7 1.2 12.7 14.9 2.6

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4275 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 33: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 59
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 98 38 745 54 19 480
Future Volume (veh/h) 98 38 745 54 19 480
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1885 1900 1870 1841
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 40 784 57 20 505
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 1 0 2 4
Cap, veh/h 145 125 2734 1229 88 2966
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.76 0.76 0.05 0.85
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1560 3676 1610 1781 3589
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 40 784 57 20 505
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1560 1791 1610 1781 1749
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.2 2.7 7.4 1.0 1.2 2.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.2 2.7 7.4 1.0 1.2 2.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 145 125 2734 1229 88 2966
V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.32 0.29 0.05 0.23 0.17
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 534 460 2734 1229 366 3513
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.2 48.6 4.0 3.3 51.2 1.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 1.4 0.3 0.1 1.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.1 1.1 2.3 0.3 0.6 0.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.4 50.0 4.3 3.3 52.5 1.5
LnGrp LOS E D A A D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 143 841 525
Approach Delay, s/veh 54.6 4.2 3.5
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 89.4 98.9 13.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 84.9 111.9 32.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 9.4 4.9 8.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.0 3.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.7
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4276 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM
34: Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 60
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh17.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 299 1 45 302 65 12 61 189 114 24 12 Future Vol, veh/h 3 299 1 45 302 65 12 61 189 114 24 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 3
Mvmt Flow 3 315 1 47 318 68 13 64 199 120 25 13
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 16.9 22.5 14.7 13.2

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 5% 1% 11% 76%
Vol Thru, % 23% 99% 73% 16%
Vol Right, % 72% 0% 16% 8%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 262 303 412 150
LT Vol 12 3 45 114
Through Vol 61 299 302 24
RT Vol 189 1 65 12
Lane Flow Rate 276 319 434 158
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.472 0.554 0.714 0.308
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.159 6.257 5.927 7.031
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 582 574 607 508
Service Time 4.221 4.318 3.981 5.105
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.474 0.556 0.715 0.311
HCM Control Delay 14.7 16.9 22.5 13.2
HCM Lane LOS B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 3.4 5.9 1.3

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4277 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - AM 35: Ramona Expy/Mountain Ave & Hemet St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 62
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 196 17 52 10 33 11 45 262 4 6 129 72 Future Volume (veh/h) 196 17 52 10 33 11 45 262 4 6 129 72 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1693 1885 1530 1900 1767 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 206 18 55 11 35 12 47 276 4 6 136 76 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 1 25 0 9 0
Cap, veh/h 305 113 345 69 194 67 120 973 352 58 769 369 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.27 0.24 0.04 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 413 1261 1795 1353 464 1612 3582 1296 1810 3357 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 206 0 73 11 0 47 47 276 4 6 136 76 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1673 1795 0 1817 1612 1791 1296 1810 1678 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.2 2.5 0.1 0.1 1.4 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.2 2.5 0.1 0.1 1.4 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 305 0 458 69 0 261 120 973 352 58 769 369 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.18 0.39 0.28 0.01 0.10 0.18 0.21 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2695 0 3135 604 0 1309 929 4242 1535 435 2846 1365 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 0.0 11.9 19.4 0.0 15.8 18.4 12.0 11.1 19.6 12.9 13.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.2 0.0 12.1 19.8 0.0 16.3 19.1 12.3 11.1 19.9 13.1 13.6 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B B B B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 279 58 327 218
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.9 16.9 13.3 13.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.3 15.3 5.6 15.4 7.1 13.5 11.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 46.3 13.0 76.7 23.0 32.3 61.0 28.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 4.5 2.2 3.4 3.2 3.6 6.4 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4278 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 1: Warren Rd & Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 310 0 3 0 0 139 4 1 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 310 0 3 0 0 139 4 1 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1870 1900 1856 1826 1826 1841 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 326 0 3 0 0 146 4 1 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 3 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 7 168 76 451 794 709 279 418 373 468 380 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3554 1610 1767 1735 1547 1394 1805 1610 817 1729 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 326 0 3 0 0 146 4 1 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1777 1610 1767 1735 1547 1394 1805 1610 817 1643 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 7 168 76 451 794 709 279 418 373 468 380 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 421 7228 3275 3087 6154 5489 1526 2032 1812 1597 1849 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 9.3 9.3 7.6 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 9.8 9.3 7.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 329 146 5
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 9.5 9.8 9.0
Approach LOS A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.6 5.2 10.0 0.0 15.8 10.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 7.8 6.0 4.6 7.8 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.4 48.6 27.0 5.4 87.6 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.3 0.0 4.2 0.0 2.0 4.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.6
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4279 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 2: Warren Rd & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 23 19 58 30 26 20 566 117 83 680 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 23 19 58 30 26 20 566 117 83 680 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1767 1900 1870 1796 1796 1900 1856 1885 1900 1885 1796 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 24 20 61 32 27 21 596 123 87 716 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 9 0 2 7 7 0 3 1 0 1 7
Cap, veh/h 87 259 233 180 359 304 123 1043 473 208 1227 521 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1767 1585 1781 1796 1520 1810 3526 1598 1810 3582 1522 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 24 20 61 32 27 21 596 123 87 716 16 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1767 1585 1781 1796 1520 1810 1763 1598 1810 1791 1522 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.6 0.5 1.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 6.7 2.8 2.1 7.7 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.6 0.5 1.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 6.7 2.8 2.1 7.7 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 87 259 233 180 359 304 123 1043 473 208 1227 521 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.34 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.57 0.26 0.42 0.58 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 347 1319 1183 760 1762 1491 425 4437 2010 926 5501 2338 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.3 17.3 17.3 19.6 15.3 15.3 20.6 14.0 12.6 19.3 12.7 10.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.3 0.8 0.8 2.6 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.4 17.4 17.3 20.0 15.3 15.3 20.8 14.2 12.7 19.8 12.8 10.2 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 48 120 740 819
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 17.7 14.1 13.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.4 17.9 8.7 10.9 7.2 20.1 6.3 13.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s22.0 57.0 18.0 33.0 9.0 70.0 7.0 44.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.1 8.7 3.5 2.6 2.5 9.7 2.1 2.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4280 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
3: Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh76.4
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 176 11 159 171 48 10 386 367 144 378 140 Future Vol, veh/h 57 176 11 159 171 48 10 386 367 144 378 140 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 1 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 60 185 12 167 180 51 11 406 386 152 398 147
Number of Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 18.6 26.1 149.5 42.1

HCM LOS C D F E

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 5% 0% 39% 0% 65% 0% 43% 0%
Vol Thru, % 95% 34% 61% 89% 35% 64% 57% 57%
Vol Right, % 0% 66% 0% 11% 0% 36% 0% 43%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 203 560 145 99 245 134 333 329
LT Vol 10 0 57 0 159 0 144 0
Through Vol 193 193 88 88 86 86 189 189
RT Vol 0 367 0 11 0 48 0 140
Lane Flow Rate 214 589 153 104 257 141 351 346
Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.517 1.351 0.411 0.273 0.672 0.345 0.85 0.792 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.716 8.249 10.371 10.082 10.037 9.432 9.275 8.756 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 415 442 350 358 363 384 393 416
Service Time 6.462 5.995 8.071 7.782 7.737 7.132 6.975 6.456 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.516 1.333 0.437 0.291 0.708 0.367 0.893 0.832 HCM Control Delay 20.5 196.2 20.1 16.5 31 17 46.7 37.5
HCM Lane LOS C F C C D C E E
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.9 27.1 1.9 1.1 4.7 1.5 8.1 6.9

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4281 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 5: Sanderson Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 35 182 15 219 144 204 10 689 226 284 1089 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 35 182 15 219 144 204 10 689 226 284 1089 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1900 1870 1885 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 37 192 16 231 152 215 11 725 238 299 1146 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 194 554 246 319 359 294 101 1821 819 389 2130 950 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.51 0.51 0.11 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3610 1601 3510 1900 1557 3510 3554 1598 3510 3582 1598 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 37 192 16 231 152 215 11 725 238 299 1146 55 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 1601 1755 1900 1557 1755 1777 1598 1755 1791 1598 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 5.8 1.0 7.8 8.5 15.7 0.4 15.1 10.3 10.0 23.1 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 5.8 1.0 7.8 8.5 15.7 0.4 15.1 10.3 10.0 23.1 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 194 554 246 319 359 294 101 1821 819 389 2130 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.35 0.07 0.72 0.42 0.73 0.11 0.40 0.29 0.77 0.54 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 261 1157 513 522 750 615 261 1821 819 638 2130 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.6 45.8 43.8 53.6 43.3 46.2 57.3 18.1 16.9 52.3 14.6 10.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.4 0.1 1.2 0.8 3.5 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.5 2.6 0.4 3.5 4.1 6.4 0.2 6.3 4.0 4.5 9.3 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.8 46.2 43.9 54.7 44.1 49.7 57.5 18.7 17.8 53.5 15.6 10.4 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D E B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 245 598 974 1500
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.3 50.2 18.9 23.0
Approach LOS D D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s15.0 22.6 7.5 76.0 10.7 26.9 17.4 66.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 5.0 6.3 5.0 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s17.0 36.5 8.0 68.5 8.0 45.5 21.0 55.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.8 7.8 2.4 25.1 3.2 17.7 12.0 17.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.3 0.0 11.6 0.0 1.6 0.4 6.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.5
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4282 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 6: Sanderson Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 97 43 233 118 102 27 862 124 62 1182 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 97 43 233 118 102 27 862 124 62 1182 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1722 1900 1900 1870 1856 1856 1900 1870 1870 1900 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 102 45 245 124 107 28 907 131 65 1244 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 12 0 0 2 3 3 0 2 2 0 2 0
Cap, veh/h 42 157 69 300 247 213 72 1452 210 104 1719 779 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.17 0.27 0.26 0.04 0.47 0.44 0.06 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1640 1248 551 1781 919 793 1810 3116 450 1810 3554 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 0 147 245 0 231 28 517 521 65 1244 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1640 0 1799 1781 0 1712 1810 1777 1789 1810 1777 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 6.8 11.6 0.0 10.1 1.3 19.2 19.4 3.1 24.4 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 6.8 11.6 0.0 10.1 1.3 19.2 19.4 3.1 24.4 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 42 0 226 300 0 459 72 828 834 104 1719 779 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.65 0.82 0.00 0.50 0.39 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.72 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 112 0 615 772 0 1210 144 1630 1642 248 3463 1569 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.9 0.0 36.7 35.2 0.0 27.4 41.1 17.7 17.9 40.4 18.0 11.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 3.1 2.1 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.8 0.8 2.3 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.0 3.2 5.1 0.0 4.1 0.6 7.6 7.7 1.4 9.4 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.3 0.0 39.8 37.2 0.0 28.2 42.4 18.4 18.7 42.7 18.6 11.8 LnGrp LOS D A D D A C D B B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 159 476 1066 1326
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.1 32.8 19.2 19.7
Approach LOS D C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.1 44.9 18.8 15.0 7.5 46.4 6.3 27.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.0 78.0 37.0 29.0 6.0 83.0 5.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.1 21.4 13.6 8.8 3.3 26.4 2.6 12.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 13.6 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.6
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4283 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 7: Sanderson Ave & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 149 344 52 152 254 53 76 730 113 154 1144 120 Future Volume (veh/h) 149 344 52 152 254 53 76 730 113 154 1144 120 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1900 1885 1870 1900 1900 1885 1885 1885 1826 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 157 362 55 160 267 56 80 768 119 162 1204 126 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 1
Cap, veh/h 206 561 250 209 563 253 121 1392 216 211 1731 779 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.45 0.43 0.12 0.50 0.50 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 3582 1595 1795 3554 1595 1810 3107 481 1795 3469 1561 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 157 362 55 160 267 56 80 443 444 162 1204 126 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1791 1595 1795 1777 1595 1810 1791 1798 1795 1735 1561 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.4 9.4 3.0 8.6 6.8 3.0 4.3 18.0 18.1 8.7 26.4 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 9.4 3.0 8.6 6.8 3.0 4.3 18.0 18.1 8.7 26.4 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 206 561 250 209 563 253 121 802 805 211 1731 779 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.65 0.22 0.77 0.47 0.22 0.66 0.55 0.55 0.77 0.70 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 417 1048 467 417 1040 467 237 1174 1179 417 2625 1181 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.6 39.2 36.5 42.5 38.0 36.4 45.2 20.1 20.3 42.4 19.1 13.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 1.8 0.6 2.2 0.9 0.6 2.3 0.8 0.8 2.2 0.7 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.8 4.2 1.2 3.9 3.0 1.2 2.0 7.4 7.5 3.9 10.2 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.8 41.0 37.1 44.7 38.8 37.0 47.5 20.9 21.1 44.6 19.8 13.7 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D D C C D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 574 483 967 1492
Approach Delay, s/veh 41.7 40.6 23.2 22.0
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s15.6 48.4 15.5 19.5 10.6 53.5 15.4 19.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s22.0 63.0 22.0 28.0 12.0 73.0 22.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 20.1 10.6 11.4 6.3 28.4 10.4 8.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.4 0.1 3.1 0.0 19.1 0.1 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.1
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4284 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 8: Lyon Ave/Potter Rd & Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 1400 493 145 994 3 422 3 127 5 8 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 1400 493 145 994 3 422 3 127 5 8 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 907 1885 1870 1900 1870 1900 1885 1411 1411 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 1474 519 153 1046 3 444 3 134 5 8 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 67 1 2 0 2 0 1 33 33 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 5 2009 606 175 2455 774 469 11 504 15 344 263 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.48 0.48 0.26 0.43 0.43 0.01 0.18 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 864 5147 1552 1810 5106 1610 1795 26 1173 1810 1948 1489 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 1474 519 153 1046 3 444 0 137 5 7 8 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 864 1716 1552 1810 1702 1610 1795 0 1200 1810 1805 1632 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 52.0 65.1 17.7 28.4 0.2 51.6 0.0 15.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 52.0 65.1 17.7 28.4 0.2 51.6 0.0 15.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.91
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 5 2009 606 175 2455 774 469 0 515 15 319 288 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.73 0.86 0.88 0.43 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.27 0.33 0.02 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 22 2009 606 264 2606 822 642 0 515 47 319 288 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh105.4 55.4 59.3 94.8 36.0 28.7 77.1 0.0 39.2 104.8 72.3 72.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 69.4 2.4 14.5 18.7 0.1 0.0 19.5 0.0 1.3 12.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 23.2 28.2 9.3 12.2 0.1 26.6 0.0 5.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 174.8 57.8 73.8 113.4 36.2 28.7 96.6 0.0 40.5 117.0 72.4 72.6 LnGrp LOS F E E F D C F A D F E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1996 1202 581 20
Approach Delay, s/veh 62.1 46.0 83.4 83.6
Approach LOS E D F F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.8 95.3 24.5 87.0 59.5 41.6 5.3 106.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.0 90.8 30.5 82.5 75.5 20.3 5.0 108.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.6 17.7 19.7 67.1 53.6 2.8 2.7 30.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.3 10.8 1.4 0.0 0.0 10.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 60.4
HCM 6th LOS E

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4285 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
9: Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 9
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh194.8
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 257 34 191 225 246 28 65 272 237 66 56 Future Vol, veh/h 73 257 34 191 225 246 28 65 272 237 66 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 77 271 36 201 237 259 29 68 286 249 69 59
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 44.4 430.5 79.9 29.7

HCM LOS E F F D

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 8% 100% 0% 29% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 18% 0% 88% 34% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 75% 0% 12% 37% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 365 73 291 662 237 66 56
LT Vol 28 73 0 191 237 0 0
Through Vol 65 0 257 225 0 66 0
RT Vol 272 0 34 246 0 0 56
Lane Flow Rate 384 77 306 697 249 69 59
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.977 0.217 0.818 1.885 0.678 0.179 0.14 Departure Headway (Hd) 11.401 12.328 11.723 9.739 12.059 11.545 10.784 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 323 294 312 383 302 313 335
Service Time 9.101 10.028 9.423 7.439 9.759 9.245 8.484 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.189 0.262 0.981 1.82 0.825 0.22 0.176 HCM Control Delay 79.9 18.4 50.9 430.5 36.8 16.7 15.2
HCM Lane LOS F C F F E C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 10.3 0.8 6.8 46.5 4.6 0.6 0.5

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4286 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
10: Lyon Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh100.6
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 344 26 62 386 50 44 238 42 40 221 14 Future Vol, veh/h 15 344 26 62 386 50 44 238 42 40 221 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 2 2 8 0 1 3 0 3 9
Mvmt Flow 16 362 27 65 406 53 46 251 44 42 233 15
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 72.4 203.4 38.8 26.9

HCM LOS F F E D

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 16% 0% 100% 0% 12% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 84% 0% 0% 93% 78% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 7% 10% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 282 42 15 370 498 40 221 14
LT Vol 44 0 15 0 62 40 0 0
Through Vol 238 0 0 344 386 0 221 0
RT Vol 0 42 0 26 50 0 0 14
Lane Flow Rate 297 44 16 389 524 42 233 15
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Degree of Util (X) 0.781 0.107 0.042 0.98 1.359 0.119 0.626 0.037 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.605 9.79 10.577 10.018 9.332 11.224 10.748 10.114 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 344 368 341 366 393 321 337 356
Service Time 8.305 7.49 8.277 7.718 7.032 8.924 8.448 7.814 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.863 0.12 0.047 1.063 1.333 0.131 0.691 0.042 HCM Control Delay 42.5 13.7 13.7 74.8 203.4 15.4 29.8 13.2 HCM Lane LOS E B B F F C D B
HCM 95th-tile Q 6.4 0.4 0.1 11.1 25.1 0.4 4 0.1

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4287 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 11: Esplanade Ave & Lyon Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 11
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 24 486 50 141 403 58 27 244 129 29 278 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 24 486 50 141 403 58 27 244 129 29 278 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1885 1885 1856 1900 1885 1870 1900 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 512 53 148 424 61 28 257 136 31 293 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 2 0 4 4
Cap, veh/h 66 676 577 203 820 684 71 427 359 75 422 358 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1885 1609 1795 1885 1571 1810 1885 1585 1810 1841 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 25 512 53 148 424 61 28 257 136 31 293 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1885 1609 1795 1885 1571 1810 1885 1585 1810 1841 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 14.7 1.3 4.9 10.1 1.4 0.9 7.5 4.5 1.0 9.0 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 14.7 1.3 4.9 10.1 1.4 0.9 7.5 4.5 1.0 9.0 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 676 577 203 820 684 71 427 359 75 422 358 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.76 0.09 0.73 0.52 0.09 0.40 0.60 0.38 0.41 0.69 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 180 1718 1466 643 2206 1839 206 1153 970 206 1126 954 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.9 17.4 13.1 26.4 12.7 10.2 28.8 21.3 20.1 28.7 21.7 18.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 1.8 0.1 1.9 0.5 0.1 1.3 1.4 0.7 1.3 2.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 6.0 0.5 2.1 3.8 0.4 0.4 3.2 1.6 0.5 3.8 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.3 19.1 13.1 28.2 13.2 10.3 30.1 22.6 20.8 30.1 23.8 18.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C C C C C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 590 633 421 341
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 16.4 22.5 24.1
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.6 17.9 10.9 26.0 6.4 18.1 6.2 30.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.5 36.3 21.5 54.7 6.5 36.3 5.6 70.6 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.0 9.5 6.9 16.7 2.9 11.0 2.8 12.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.1 3.9 0.0 1.8 0.0 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4288 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 12: State St & Sagecrest Dr/College Entrance
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 25 9 80 164 9 48 150 782 137 12 1105 59 Future Volume (vph) 25 9 80 164 9 48 150 782 137 12 1105 59 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1684 1751 1658 1805 1863 1544 1612 3574 1615 Flt Permitted 0.93 0.62 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1586 1143 1658 1805 1863 1544 1612 3574 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 9 84 173 9 51 158 823 144 13 1163 62 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 65 0 0 40 0 0 0 42 0 0 33
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 54 0 173 20 0 158 823 102 13 1163 29 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 2% 3% 12% 1% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 18.5 10.9 52.8 52.8 0.7 42.6 42.6 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 20.5 12.9 55.8 55.8 2.7 45.6 45.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.57 0.57 0.03 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 333 240 348 239 1067 884 44 1673 756 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.09 c0.44 0.01 0.33
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.15 0.07 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.72 0.06 0.66 0.77 0.12 0.30 0.70 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 31.4 35.8 30.7 40.2 15.9 9.5 46.4 20.4 14.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 8.7 0.0 5.2 3.2 0.0 1.4 1.0 0.0 Delay (s) 31.5 44.5 30.7 45.4 19.1 9.5 47.8 21.4 14.0
Level of Service C D C D B A D C B
Approach Delay (s) 31.5 40.9 21.6 21.4
Approach LOS C D C C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.4 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4289 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
13: State St & W Community College Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 46.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 30 76 0 64 36 898 66 80 1184 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 30 76 0 64 36 898 66 80 1184 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 0 2 32 80 0 67 38 945 69 84 1246 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1963 2507 623 1851 2473 510 1246 0 0 1017 0 0 Stage 1 1414 1414 - 1059 1059 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 549 1093 - 792 1414 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.94 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.32 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 39 29 434 ~ 47 30 509 566 - - 690 - - Stage 1 147 206 - 243 304 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 493 293 - 353 206 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 29 24 434 ~ 35 25 508 566 - - 688 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 29 24 - ~ 35 25 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 137 181 - 226 283 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 399 272 - 284 181 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 25.4 $ 789.6 0.4 0.7

HCM LOS D F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 566 - - 210 61 688 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - - 0.16 2.416 0.122 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 - - 25.4$ 789.6 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - D F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.6 14.6 0.4 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4290 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
13: State St & W Community College Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 27.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 30 76 0 64 36 898 66 80 1184 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 30 76 0 64 36 898 66 80 1184 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0 150 - - 110 - 175
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0
Mvmt Flow 0 2 32 80 0 67 38 945 69 84 1246 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1963 2507 623 1851 2473 510 1246 0 0 1017 0 0 Stage 1 1414 1414 - 1059 1059 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 549 1093 - 792 1414 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.94 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.32 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 39 29 434 ~ 47 30 509 566 - - 690 - - Stage 1 147 206 - 243 304 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 493 293 - 353 206 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 29 24 434 ~ 35 25 508 566 - - 688 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 29 24 - ~ 35 25 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 137 181 - 226 283 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 399 272 - 284 181 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 25.4 $ 457.9 0.4 0.7

HCM LOS D F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 566 - - 210 35 508 688 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - - 0.16 2.286 0.133 0.122 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 - - 25.4$ 832.4 13.2 11 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - D F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.6 9 0.5 0.4 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4291 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 14: State St & W Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 172 1152 479 181 688 247 530 731 172 439 731 177 Future Volume (veh/h) 172 1152 479 181 688 247 530 731 172 439 731 177 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1870 1870 1885 1856 1870 1870 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 181 1213 504 191 724 260 558 769 181 462 769 186 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 246 1311 401 198 1246 373 567 1111 496 491 761 184 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.27 0.27 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 5147 1574 3456 5147 1541 1781 3554 1587 1795 2846 688 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 181 1213 504 191 724 260 558 769 181 462 484 471 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1755 1716 1574 1728 1716 1541 1781 1777 1587 1795 1791 1743 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.9 36.1 40.0 8.7 19.5 24.2 48.8 29.8 13.9 39.5 42.0 42.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.9 36.1 40.0 8.7 19.5 24.2 48.8 29.8 13.9 39.5 42.0 42.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 246 1311 401 198 1246 373 567 1111 496 491 479 466 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.93 1.26 0.96 0.58 0.70 0.98 0.69 0.36 0.94 1.01 1.01 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 291 1311 401 198 1246 373 567 1111 496 537 479 466 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 71.6 57.0 58.5 73.8 52.5 54.3 53.1 47.3 41.9 55.8 57.5 57.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 11.0 134.5 53.2 0.5 4.8 33.4 1.6 0.2 23.2 43.7 44.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 17.0 30.9 5.3 8.5 9.9 27.1 13.5 5.6 21.1 24.8 24.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 77.5 68.1 193.0 127.0 52.9 59.0 86.5 48.9 42.0 79.1 101.2 102.1 LnGrp LOS E E F F D E F D D E F F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1898 1175 1508 1417
Approach Delay, s/veh 102.1 66.3 62.0 94.3
Approach LOS F E E F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 44.0 54.0 46.0 15.0 42.0 46.9 53.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 38.0 49.0 40.0 12.0 34.0 46.0 43.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 42.0 50.8 44.0 9.9 26.2 41.5 31.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.6 0.4 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 83.2
HCM 6th LOS F

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4292 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 15: State St & Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 15
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 17 56 41 88 139 253 140 1196 91 296 1028 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 17 56 41 88 139 253 140 1196 91 296 1028 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1885 1885 1870 1900 1870 1870 1885 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 18 59 43 93 146 266 147 1259 0 312 1082 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 2
Cap, veh/h 41 296 246 131 388 324 190 1583 353 1880
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.45 0.00 0.20 0.53 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1582 1795 1885 1573 1810 3647 0 1795 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 18 59 43 93 146 266 147 1259 0 312 1082 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1582 1795 1885 1573 1810 1777 0 1795 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 3.3 2.9 6.3 8.2 20.0 9.8 37.6 0.0 20.9 25.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 3.3 2.9 6.3 8.2 20.0 9.8 37.6 0.0 20.9 25.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 41 296 246 131 388 324 190 1583 353 1880 V/C Ratio(X) 0.44 0.20 0.17 0.71 0.38 0.82 0.77 0.80 0.88 0.58 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 94 461 384 232 604 504 380 2644 697 3247 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.7 45.5 45.3 56.0 42.3 46.9 53.9 29.4 0.0 48.3 19.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.2 0.3 0.3 6.9 0.6 6.2 6.5 0.9 0.0 7.3 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 1.6 1.2 3.1 3.9 8.4 4.8 16.0 0.0 10.1 10.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.8 45.8 45.7 63.0 42.9 53.1 60.4 30.4 0.0 55.6 20.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D E D D E C E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 120 505 1406 A 1394 A
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.9 52.0 33.5 28.0
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s28.3 59.1 13.0 23.2 18.0 69.4 6.8 29.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s47.5 90.0 15.0 29.0 25.0 111.0 5.9 38.6 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.9 39.6 8.3 5.3 11.8 27.5 3.2 22.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 13.5 0.1 0.4 0.3 10.9 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4293 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 16: State St & Cottonwood Ave/N Brinton St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 16
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 185 99 125 30 113 53 128 979 16 41 881 149 Future Volume (veh/h) 185 99 125 30 113 53 128 979 16 41 881 149 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1900 1885 1900 1870 1870 1900 1856 1856 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 195 104 132 32 119 56 135 1031 17 43 927 157 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 239 450 378 62 165 78 175 1724 28 74 1313 222 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.49 0.47 0.04 0.43 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1900 1596 1810 1202 565 1810 3547 58 1810 3048 516 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 195 104 132 32 0 175 135 512 536 43 544 540 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1900 1596 1810 0 1767 1810 1763 1843 1810 1791 1774 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.5 3.5 5.5 1.4 0.0 7.5 5.8 16.7 16.7 1.9 19.7 19.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.5 3.5 5.5 1.4 0.0 7.5 5.8 16.7 16.7 1.9 19.7 19.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 239 450 378 62 0 243 175 857 896 74 771 764 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.23 0.35 0.51 0.00 0.72 0.77 0.60 0.60 0.58 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 592 1029 864 155 0 521 433 1512 1581 205 1311 1298 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.4 24.5 25.2 37.7 0.0 32.8 35.0 14.8 14.8 37.4 18.5 18.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.3 0.7 2.4 0.0 4.8 2.7 0.8 0.8 2.6 1.4 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.7 1.6 2.1 0.6 0.0 3.5 2.6 6.3 6.6 0.9 7.9 7.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.0 24.8 25.9 40.1 0.0 37.7 37.8 15.6 15.6 40.0 19.9 20.1 LnGrp LOS D C C D A D D B B D B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 431 207 1183 1127
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.2 38.0 18.1 20.8
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.3 42.6 6.7 22.8 11.7 38.2 14.7 14.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s* 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 * 4.2 5.3 * 4.2 * 4.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 8.8 66.8 * 6.6 * 43 * 19 56.8 * 26 * 23 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.9 18.7 3.4 7.5 7.8 21.8 10.5 9.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.1 0.0 1.3 0.1 11.1 0.1 0.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4294 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 17: State St & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 17
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 140 251 114 44 264 68 155 1004 62 87 847 151 Future Volume (veh/h) 140 251 114 44 264 68 155 1004 62 87 847 151 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1856 1885 1885 1870 1841 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 147 264 120 46 278 72 163 1057 65 92 892 159 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 3 1 1 2 4 2 2 0 2 2
Cap, veh/h 273 594 489 281 608 508 224 1663 102 134 1277 228 Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.13 0.49 0.47 0.07 0.43 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1045 1900 1565 1006 1885 1578 1753 3399 209 1810 2999 534 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 147 264 120 46 278 72 163 552 570 92 528 523 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1045 1900 1565 1006 1885 1578 1753 1777 1831 1810 1777 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.8 11.6 6.0 4.0 12.3 3.4 9.3 24.1 24.2 5.2 25.4 25.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 26.0 11.6 6.0 15.5 12.3 3.4 9.3 24.1 24.2 5.2 25.4 25.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 273 594 489 281 608 508 224 869 896 134 756 748 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.44 0.25 0.16 0.46 0.14 0.73 0.64 0.64 0.69 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 426 872 718 419 865 724 419 1224 1261 242 1037 1025 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.4 28.7 26.7 34.1 28.2 25.2 43.9 19.8 19.9 47.2 24.5 24.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.2 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.3 2.6 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.7 5.4 2.3 1.0 5.6 1.3 4.1 10.0 10.3 2.4 10.9 10.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.7 29.4 27.1 34.5 28.9 25.3 45.6 21.4 21.5 49.6 27.1 27.3 LnGrp LOS D C C C C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 531 396 1285 1143
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.3 28.9 24.5 29.0
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.7 55.1 37.7 17.4 49.5 37.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 * 6 6.0 * 6 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.0 70.0 * 47 23.0 * 60 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.2 26.2 28.0 11.3 27.5 17.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 20.0 3.7 0.1 16.0 3.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.8
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4295 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 18: State St & W Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 18
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 250 410 143 117 605 168 159 765 48 80 732 193 Future Volume (veh/h) 250 410 143 117 605 168 159 765 48 80 732 193 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1885 1856 1856 1885 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 263 432 151 123 637 177 167 805 51 84 771 203 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 3 1 2 2
Cap, veh/h 299 884 306 160 725 201 204 1296 82 118 939 247 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.34 0.33 0.09 0.26 0.25 0.11 0.39 0.38 0.07 0.34 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 2619 906 1795 2789 774 1795 3363 213 1795 2781 732 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 263 296 287 123 412 402 167 422 434 84 493 481 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1805 1720 1795 1805 1757 1795 1763 1813 1795 1777 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 18.8 17.1 17.5 8.8 28.7 28.8 11.9 25.4 25.4 6.0 33.4 33.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.8 17.1 17.5 8.8 28.7 28.8 11.9 25.4 25.4 6.0 33.4 33.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.42
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 299 609 580 160 469 457 204 679 699 118 600 586 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.49 0.49 0.77 0.88 0.88 0.82 0.62 0.62 0.71 0.82 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 355 619 589 246 509 495 232 711 732 178 663 648 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.4 34.5 34.8 58.5 46.6 46.8 56.9 32.6 32.7 60.1 39.9 40.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.3 0.6 0.7 2.9 15.2 15.7 16.0 2.4 2.3 2.9 9.0 9.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln9.9 7.7 7.5 4.1 14.8 14.6 6.3 11.3 11.6 2.8 16.0 15.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 70.7 35.1 35.5 61.4 61.7 62.5 72.8 35.0 35.0 63.0 48.8 49.2 LnGrp LOS E D D E E E E D D E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 846 937 1023 1058
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.3 62.0 41.2 50.1
Approach LOS D E D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.7 54.6 15.7 48.3 18.9 48.3 25.9 38.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s12.0 52.0 17.0 44.0 16.0 48.0 25.0 36.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s8.0 27.4 10.8 19.5 13.9 35.4 20.8 30.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.8 0.0 3.8 0.0 7.9 0.1 2.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 49.8
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4296 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 19: San Jacinto Ave/Bergin St & W Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 19
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 1871 250 71 1229 1 248 0 69 1 1 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 1 1871 250 71 1229 1 248 0 69 1 1 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1900 1856 1856 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1 1969 263 75 1294 1 261 0 73 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 2 2296 1030 88 2504 2 290 0 271 21 9 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.05 0.69 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3582 1606 1810 3615 3 1795 0 1610 1810 1900 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1 1969 263 75 631 664 261 0 73 1 1 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1791 1606 1810 1763 1855 1795 0 1610 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 51.3 8.2 4.8 20.0 20.0 16.7 0.0 4.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 51.3 8.2 4.8 20.0 20.0 16.7 0.0 4.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2 2296 1030 88 1221 1285 290 0 271 21 9 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.86 0.26 0.85 0.52 0.52 0.90 0.00 0.27 0.05 0.11 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 70 2373 1064 93 1221 1285 295 0 275 541 555 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.5 16.7 9.0 55.2 8.6 8.6 48.1 0.0 42.8 57.2 58.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 103.3 3.4 0.2 44.6 0.5 0.5 27.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 20.3 2.8 3.3 7.2 7.5 9.6 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 161.7 20.2 9.2 99.8 9.1 9.1 75.4 0.0 43.0 57.5 59.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C A F A A E A D E E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 2233 1370 334 2
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.9 14.1 68.3 58.6
Approach LOS B B E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.7 79.0 4.6 3.7 85.0 23.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 * 4.2 3.5 6.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.5 75.5 * 34 5.0 77.0 19.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.8 53.3 2.1 2.1 22.0 18.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 19.9 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4297 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 22 118 72 55 95 21 7 15 420 170 29 Future Volume (vph) 2 22 118 72 55 95 21 7 15 420 170 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.98
Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1736 1786 1788 3455
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.68 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1653 1233 1788 3455
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 23 124 76 58 100 22 7 16 442 179 31
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 213 0 0 186 0 0 0 458 201 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 3 2 2 10 3 4 10 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 3% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0%
Turn Type Perm Perm NA Perm NA Split Split NA
Protected Phases 4 4 2 2 2
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 24.5 24.5 37.0 37.0
Effective Green, g (s) 25.6 25.6 38.6 38.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.31 0.31
Clearance Time (s) 5.1 5.1 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 344 257 562 1086
v/s Ratio Prot c0.26 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.15
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.72 0.81 0.19
Uniform Delay, d1 44.2 45.3 38.8 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 8.3 8.9 0.1
Delay (s) 46.5 53.6 47.7 30.7
Level of Service D D D C
Approach Delay (s) 46.5 53.6 42.4
Approach LOS D D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 122.8 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4298 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 20: San Jacinto Ave & Main Street & S Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3
Movement SBL SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER SER2
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 222 18 1 6 43 228 5
Future Volume (vph) 3 222 18 1 6 43 228 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1848 1805 1541
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1848 1805 1541
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 234 19 1 6 45 240 5
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 257 0 0 0 51 164 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 10 3 4 2 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Turn Type Split NA Prot Prot Perm
Protected Phases 3 3 1 1
Permitted Phases 1
Actuated Green, G (s) 21.4 18.0 18.0
Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 19.6 19.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.16 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 5.6 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 346 288 245
v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11
v/c Ratio 0.74 0.18 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 47.1 44.6 48.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 0.1 5.6
Delay (s) 54.5 44.7 54.1
Level of Service D D D
Approach Delay (s) 54.5 52.5
Approach LOS D D
Intersection Summary

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4299 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 21: San Jacinto Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 21
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 49 247 187 135 212 37 213 593 138 83 633 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 49 247 187 135 212 37 213 593 138 83 633 33 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 260 197 142 223 39 224 624 145 87 666 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 53 442 359 168 898 154 258 721 594 99 1477 77 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.30 0.28 0.14 0.38 0.39 0.06 0.30 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1545 1810 3038 521 1810 1885 1528 1795 4999 261 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 260 197 142 130 132 224 624 145 87 456 245 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1545 1810 1791 1769 1810 1885 1528 1795 1716 1829 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 8.2 7.6 5.2 3.7 3.9 8.2 20.6 4.3 3.2 7.3 7.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 8.2 7.6 5.2 3.7 3.9 8.2 20.6 4.3 3.2 7.3 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 53 442 359 168 530 523 258 721 594 99 1014 540 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.59 0.55 0.85 0.24 0.25 0.87 0.87 0.24 0.88 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 257 878 714 509 1077 1063 758 1759 1435 346 2424 1292 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 23.0 22.8 30.2 18.1 18.3 28.3 19.2 13.9 31.7 19.3 19.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.1 0.5 0.5 4.5 0.1 0.1 3.5 1.3 0.1 8.8 0.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.3 3.5 2.6 2.4 1.5 1.5 3.6 8.3 1.4 1.6 2.7 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.8 23.5 23.3 34.6 18.1 18.4 31.8 20.5 14.0 40.5 19.4 19.6 LnGrp LOS E C C C B B C C B D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 509 404 993 788
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.3 24.0 22.1 21.8
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.0 24.0 7.7 29.8 10.3 19.7 13.6 23.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 3.5 5.3 3.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s10.1 39.3 13.5 62.1 19.5 29.9 28.8 46.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.9 5.9 5.2 22.6 7.2 10.2 10.2 9.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.8 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.9 0.1 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.3
HCM 6th LOS C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4300 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 22: San Jacinto Ave & W Esplanade Ave/E Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 22
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 105 234 182 144 392 81 291 829 104 155 701 118 Future Volume (veh/h) 105 234 182 144 392 81 291 829 104 155 701 118 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 111 246 192 152 413 85 306 873 109 163 738 124 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 132 470 351 177 792 161 336 1352 590 189 905 152 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.24 0.23 0.10 0.27 0.25 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.30 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1934 1443 1795 2944 600 1795 3582 1563 1795 3063 514 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 111 227 211 152 250 248 306 873 109 163 431 431 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1791 1586 1795 1791 1753 1795 1791 1563 1795 1791 1786 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.5 10.0 10.7 7.6 10.8 11.1 15.2 18.3 4.3 8.1 20.4 20.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.5 10.0 10.7 7.6 10.8 11.1 15.2 18.3 4.3 8.1 20.4 20.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 132 435 386 177 482 471 336 1352 590 189 529 528 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.52 0.55 0.86 0.52 0.53 0.91 0.65 0.18 0.86 0.82 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 302 658 583 295 654 640 534 1768 771 354 705 703 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.7 29.9 30.8 40.5 28.3 28.6 36.3 23.4 19.0 40.1 29.8 30.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.4 0.4 0.5 6.0 0.3 0.3 9.5 0.2 0.1 4.4 4.1 4.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.6 4.3 4.1 3.6 4.6 4.6 7.4 7.5 1.5 3.8 9.1 9.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.2 30.3 31.2 46.5 28.6 29.0 45.8 23.6 19.1 44.5 33.9 34.1 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C B D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 549 650 1288 1025
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.0 32.9 28.5 35.7
Approach LOS C C C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.6 38.4 13.0 26.2 21.1 30.9 10.6 28.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s18.5 44.0 15.5 32.0 27.6 34.9 15.7 31.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.1 20.3 9.6 12.7 17.2 22.4 7.5 13.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.6 0.1 1.7 0.3 3.1 0.1 1.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4301 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
23: S Hewitt St & Main St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 23
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.2
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 242 64 96 238 66 148
Future Vol, veh/h 0 242 64 96 238 66 148
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 1 2 1 3 2
Mvmt Flow 0 255 67 101 251 69 156
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB
Opposing Lanes 2 1 0
Conflicting Approach Left NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 2
HCM Control Delay 11.9 11 10.7

HCM LOS B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2
Vol Left, % 31% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 79% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 69% 21% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 214 306 96 238
LT Vol 66 0 96 0
Through Vol 0 242 0 238
RT Vol 148 64 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 225 322 101 251
Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.322 0.442 0.166 0.376
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.151 4.94 5.927 5.405
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 692 722 599 659
Service Time 3.237 3.027 3.72 3.197
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.325 0.446 0.169 0.381
HCM Control Delay 10.7 11.9 9.9 11.5
HCM Lane LOS B B A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 2.3 0.6 1.7

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4302 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
24: S Hewitt St & E 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 24
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh13.6
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 54 154 132 69 124 6 90 154 40 4 133 20 Future Vol, veh/h 54 154 132 69 124 6 90 154 40 4 133 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
Mvmt Flow 57 162 139 73 131 6 95 162 42 4 140 21
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 14.9 12.2 14.2 11.4

HCM LOS B B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 32% 16% 35% 3%
Vol Thru, % 54% 45% 62% 85%
Vol Right, % 14% 39% 3% 13%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 284 340 199 157
LT Vol 90 54 69 4
Through Vol 154 154 124 133
RT Vol 40 132 6 20
Lane Flow Rate 299 358 209 165
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.481 0.543 0.346 0.276
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.797 5.458 5.954 6.018
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 616 655 599 592
Service Time 3.878 3.534 4.045 4.114
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.485 0.547 0.349 0.279
HCM Control Delay 14.2 14.9 12.2 11.4
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.6 3.3 1.5 1.1

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4303 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 25: S Hewitt St & E Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 25
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 164 222 166 66 324 59 68 290 29 6 102 34 Future Volume (veh/h) 164 222 166 66 324 59 68 290 29 6 102 34 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1870 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 1856 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 173 234 175 69 341 62 72 305 31 6 107 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 0
Cap, veh/h 256 614 440 147 746 134 153 821 83 50 525 169 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.31 0.29 0.08 0.25 0.23 0.08 0.25 0.23 0.03 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1988 1424 1781 3000 539 1810 3258 329 1767 2680 864 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 173 210 199 69 200 203 72 165 171 6 71 72 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1791 1622 1781 1777 1762 1810 1777 1810 1767 1805 1740 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 4.5 4.8 1.8 4.7 4.8 1.9 3.7 3.8 0.2 1.6 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 4.5 4.8 1.8 4.7 4.8 1.9 3.7 3.8 0.2 1.6 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.50
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 256 553 501 147 442 438 153 448 456 50 354 341 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.38 0.40 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.37 0.37 0.12 0.20 0.21 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1473 2167 1962 767 1457 1445 779 1676 1707 290 1221 1177 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.8 13.2 13.7 21.3 15.5 15.7 21.3 15.0 15.1 23.1 16.4 16.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.8 1.6 1.6 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.7 1.4 1.5 0.1 0.6 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.0 13.8 14.4 22.2 16.5 16.8 22.1 15.8 15.9 23.5 16.8 16.9 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 582 472 408 149
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.1 17.5 16.9 17.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.4 16.3 8.0 19.1 8.1 13.6 11.0 16.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.0 45.0 20.0 58.0 20.0 32.0 39.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.2 5.8 3.8 6.8 3.9 3.7 6.5 6.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 4.1 0.0 1.1 0.1 3.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4304 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 26: S Hewitt St & E Commonwealth Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 26
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 120 105 5 2 62 42 8 184 10 71 115 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 120 105 5 2 62 42 8 184 10 71 115 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 126 111 5 2 65 44 8 194 11 75 121 162 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Cap, veh/h 231 327 15 230 190 128 869 1405 1197 921 1405 1197 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Sat Flow, veh/h 1299 1803 81 1287 1047 709 1103 1885 1606 1194 1885 1606 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 126 0 116 2 0 109 8 194 11 75 121 162 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1299 0 1884 1287 0 1755 1103 1885 1606 1194 1885 1606 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.2 0.0 5.8 0.1 0.0 5.9 0.2 3.2 0.2 2.1 1.9 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.1 0.0 5.8 6.0 0.0 5.9 2.1 3.2 0.2 5.2 1.9 3.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 231 0 342 230 0 318 869 1405 1197 921 1405 1197 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.00 0.34 0.01 0.00 0.34 0.01 0.14 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 963 0 1404 956 0 1308 869 1405 1197 921 1405 1197 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.9 0.0 38.8 41.4 0.0 38.9 4.1 3.9 3.6 4.7 3.8 3.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.4 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.9 0.0 39.4 41.5 0.0 39.6 4.1 4.1 3.6 4.9 3.9 4.2 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 242 111 213 358
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.8 39.6 4.1 4.2
Approach LOS D D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 85.0 23.7 85.0 23.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 80.5 80.5 80.5 80.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 18.1 7.2 8.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 1.1 1.6 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4305 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 27: W Ramona Expy & Main St/Lake Park Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 27
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 254 49 313 174 95 63 586 237 116 982 37 Future Volume (veh/h) 26 254 49 313 174 95 63 586 237 116 982 37 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1885 1870 1870 1900 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 267 52 329 183 100 66 617 249 122 1034 39 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 317 331 277 418 435 363 101 871 351 166 1366 52 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.35 0.33 0.09 0.39 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1885 1577 1795 1870 1559 1810 2470 996 1810 3519 133 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 267 52 329 183 100 66 444 422 122 526 547 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1885 1577 1795 1870 1559 1810 1777 1689 1810 1791 1861 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 14.7 3.0 18.6 9.0 5.7 3.9 23.3 23.5 7.1 27.6 27.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 14.7 3.0 18.6 9.0 5.7 3.9 23.3 23.5 7.1 27.6 27.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 317 331 277 418 435 363 101 626 596 166 695 722 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.81 0.19 0.79 0.42 0.28 0.65 0.71 0.71 0.74 0.76 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 535 557 466 663 691 576 167 886 843 267 993 1032 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.4 42.9 38.1 39.0 35.3 34.1 50.0 30.2 30.9 47.9 28.7 28.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 3.5 0.2 4.7 0.9 0.6 2.6 1.8 1.9 2.4 2.4 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 7.1 1.2 8.7 4.2 2.2 1.8 10.1 9.8 3.3 12.0 12.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.4 46.4 38.3 43.7 36.2 34.6 52.6 32.0 32.9 50.3 31.1 31.1 LnGrp LOS D D D D D C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 346 612 932 1195
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.5 40.0 33.9 33.1
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.9 42.2 23.0 10.1 46.0 29.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 51.5 31.0 9.0 57.5 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.1 25.5 16.7 5.9 29.6 20.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.5 1.2 0.0 9.9 3.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.0
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4306 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 28: Mountain Ave/Ramona Expy & E 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 28
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 62 2 57 2 6 2 34 752 10 18 1326 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 62 2 57 2 6 2 34 752 10 18 1326 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1856 1885 1885 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 65 2 60 2 6 2 36 792 11 19 1396 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 126 8 234 2 108 36 50 2267 31 24 2166 84
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.63 0.60 0.01 0.62 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 52 1566 1810 1364 455 1767 3617 50 1810 3516 136 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 65 0 62 2 0 8 36 392 411 19 710 740 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1618 1810 0 1818 1767 1791 1876 1810 1791 1860 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.5 7.9 7.9 0.8 19.1 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.5 7.9 7.9 0.8 19.1 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 126 0 241 2 0 144 50 1123 1176 24 1104 1146 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.00 0.26 0.84 0.00 0.06 0.73 0.35 0.35 0.78 0.64 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 0 801 139 0 751 173 1761 1845 143 1735 1802 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.0 0.0 29.1 37.9 0.0 32.4 36.5 6.8 6.8 37.3 9.2 9.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.0 0.2 118.5 0.0 0.1 7.3 0.3 0.3 17.9 0.9 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 2.6 2.7 0.5 6.4 6.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.2 0.0 29.3 156.4 0.0 32.5 43.8 7.0 7.0 55.2 10.1 10.2 LnGrp LOS D A C F A C D A A E B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 127 10 839 1469
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.3 57.3 8.6 10.8
Approach LOS C E A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.8 50.7 9.3 10.0 5.0 51.5 3.9 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 6.0 4.8 5.3 3.7 6.0 3.7 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.4 71.4 11.2 30.0 6.3 72.5 6.1 36.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.5 21.3 4.6 2.3 2.8 9.9 2.1 4.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4307 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 29: Ramona Expy & E Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 251 0 252 0 0 0 181 81 0 0 213 512 Future Volume (vph) 251 0 252 0 0 0 181 81 0 0 213 512
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3203 1805 3539 3574 1615
Flt Permitted 0.81 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 2647 1805 3539 3574 1615
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 264 0 265 0 0 0 191 85 0 0 224 539
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 434
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 407 0 0 0 0 191 85 0 0 224 105
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 6 3 8 4
Permitted Phases 6 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 58.8 16.0 39.3 18.8 18.8
Effective Green, g (s) 58.8 16.5 41.8 21.3 21.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.15 0.38 0.20 0.20
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 1.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1426 272 1355 697 315
v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.02 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 c0.07
v/c Ratio 1.00dl 0.70 0.06 0.32 0.33
Uniform Delay, d1 13.7 44.0 21.3 37.7 37.8
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 6.5 0.0 0.4 0.9
Delay (s) 13.8 50.5 21.3 38.1 38.7
Level of Service B D C D D
Approach Delay (s) 13.8 0.0 41.5 38.5
Approach LOS B A D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 109.1 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4308 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 30: Soboba Rd & Lake Park Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 30
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 0 70 0 1 0 102 31 1 0 15 137
Future Volume (veh/h) 11 0 70 0 1 0 102 31 1 0 15 137
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1885 1856 1856 1900 1707 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 0 74 0 1 0 107 33 1 0 16 144
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 13 0
Cap, veh/h 209 0 184 0 6 0 255 882 27 6 416 393
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.49 0.45 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 0 1598 0 1900 0 1795 1791 54 1810 1707 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 0 74 0 1 0 107 0 34 0 16 144
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1598 0 1900 0 1795 0 1846 1810 1707 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 2.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 209 0 184 0 6 0 255 0 909 6 416 393 V/C Ratio(X) 0.06 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 725 0 640 0 444 0 1127 0 2755 381 1836 1732 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.8 0.0 12.3 0.0 14.9 0.0 11.7 0.0 3.9 0.0 8.6 9.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.8 0.0 12.8 0.0 19.1 0.0 12.8 0.0 4.0 0.0 8.7 10.1 LnGrp LOS B A B A B A B A A A A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 86 1 141 160
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.7 19.1 10.7 10.0
Approach LOS B B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.4 11.3 3.7 0.0 18.7 7.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.3 3.7 4.5 5.3 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s17.5 30.9 7.3 5.0 43.4 11.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.6 4.2 2.0 0.0 2.3 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4309 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th TWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
31: Cawston Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 31
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 120 38 58 114 15 50
Future Vol, veh/h 120 38 58 114 15 50
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 4 4 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 200 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 2 2 2 0 2
Mvmt Flow 126 40 61 120 16 53
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 170 0 392 87
Stage 1 - - - - 150 -
Stage 2 - - - - 242 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.6 6.93
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.219 - 3.5 3.319
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1406 - 603 955
Stage 1 - - - - 868 -
Stage 2 - - - - 803 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1401 - 574 951
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 574 -
Stage 1 - - - - 865 -
Stage 2 - - - - 768 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 574 951 - - 1401 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0.055 - - 0.044 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 9 - - 7.7 -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0.1 -

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4310 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
32: Cawaston Ave & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 32
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 56.5
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 54 429 78 111 222 42 59 70 81 21 104 51 Future Vol, veh/h 54 429 78 111 222 42 59 70 81 21 104 51 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 4 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 5
Mvmt Flow 57 452 82 117 234 44 62 74 85 22 109 54
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 3 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 102.6 30.8 12.7 16.7

HCM LOS F D B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 10% 30% 12%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 0% 76% 59% 59%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 14% 11% 29%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 59 70 81 561 375 176
LT Vol 59 0 0 54 111 21
Through Vol 0 70 0 429 222 104
RT Vol 0 0 81 78 42 51
Lane Flow Rate 62 74 85 591 395 185
Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.147 0.164 0.173 1.124 0.771 0.405
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.027 8.491 7.747 6.852 7.392 8.425 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 400 425 466 531 493 430
Service Time 6.727 6.191 5.447 4.552 5.092 6.125
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.155 0.174 0.182 1.113 0.801 0.43
HCM Control Delay 13.3 12.8 12.1 102.6 30.8 16.7
HCM Lane LOS B B B F D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.6 0.6 19.5 6.8 1.9

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4311 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 33: Sanderson Ave & Ramona Blvd
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 33
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 123 543 65 212 734
Future Volume (veh/h) 178 123 543 65 212 734
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1870 1900 1856 1885
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 187 129 572 68 223 773
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 2 0 3 1
Cap, veh/h 248 219 2051 929 276 2781
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.58 0.58 0.16 0.78
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1598 3647 1610 1767 3676
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 129 572 68 223 773
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1598 1777 1610 1767 1791
Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 7.0 7.5 1.7 11.3 5.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.2 7.0 7.5 1.7 11.3 5.7
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 248 219 2051 929 276 2781
V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.59 0.28 0.07 0.81 0.28
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 782 691 2051 929 917 4081
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.4 37.5 9.9 8.6 37.7 2.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.6 2.5 0.3 0.2 5.6 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.3 2.9 2.8 0.6 5.2 1.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.0 40.0 10.2 8.8 43.3 3.0
LnGrp LOS D D B A D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 316 640 996
Approach Delay, s/veh 41.8 10.0 12.0
Approach LOS D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s18.4 57.4 75.8 16.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s47.5 52.9 104.9 39.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.3 9.5 7.7 11.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 4.7 6.7 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.2
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4312 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th AWSC Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM
34: Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 34
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh42.2
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 396 2 99 383 112 3 60 91 79 46 24 Future Vol, veh/h 15 396 2 99 383 112 3 60 91 79 46 24
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 9 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 2
Mvmt Flow 16 417 2 104 403 118 3 63 96 83 48 25
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 25.1 68.5 13.5 14.1

HCM LOS D F B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 2% 4% 17% 53%
Vol Thru, % 39% 96% 64% 31%
Vol Right, % 59% 0% 19% 16%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 154 413 594 149
LT Vol 3 15 99 79
Through Vol 60 396 383 46
RT Vol 91 2 112 24
Lane Flow Rate 162 435 625 157
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.313 0.739 1.03 0.319
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.224 6.315 5.93 7.582
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 501 578 619 477
Service Time 5.224 4.315 3.93 5.582
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.323 0.753 1.01 0.329
HCM Control Delay 13.5 25.1 68.5 14.1
HCM Lane LOS B D F B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 6.3 16.5 1.4

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4313 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 35: Ramona Expy/Mountain Ave & Hemet St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 35
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 81 11 41 9 7 11 56 186 4 12 302 169 Future Volume (veh/h) 81 11 41 9 7 11 56 186 4 12 302 169 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1900 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 12 43 9 7 12 59 196 4 13 318 178 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
Cap, veh/h 173 68 243 62 79 136 146 1343 608 71 1205 542 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.19 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 362 1298 1810 627 1074 1810 3554 1610 1810 3582 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 85 0 55 9 0 19 59 196 4 13 318 178 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 0 1660 1810 0 1701 1810 1777 1610 1810 1791 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.1 0.3 2.9 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.1 0.3 2.9 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 173 0 311 62 0 215 146 1343 608 71 1205 542 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.00 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.09 0.40 0.15 0.01 0.18 0.26 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1429 0 1873 490 0 1036 1143 5957 2699 612 4953 2227 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 0.0 15.6 20.8 0.0 17.5 19.4 9.1 8.6 20.6 10.7 11.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.8 0.0 16.0 21.2 0.0 17.7 20.0 9.2 8.6 21.1 11.0 11.7 LnGrp LOS B A B C A B C A A C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 140 28 259 509
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 18.8 11.6 11.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.7 20.8 5.5 12.3 7.6 18.9 8.2 9.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 71.3 11.0 48.7 27.0 58.3 34.0 25.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.3 3.6 2.2 3.3 3.4 5.7 4.0 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 6.3 0.1 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.8
HCM 6th LOS B

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4314 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix E
Cumulative Plus Plan
(with Recommended Improvements)
Intersection Level of Service
Worksheets

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4315 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements - AM 8: Lyon Ave/Potter Rd & Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 1068 314 123 1117 4 448 1 194 1 1 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 1068 314 123 1117 4 448 1 194 1 1 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1841 1885 1856 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 418 418 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 1124 331 129 1176 4 472 1 204 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 100 100
Cap, veh/h 15 1189 378 157 1620 511 503 4 785 13 87 78
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.28 0.49 0.48 0.01 0.22 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 5025 1598 1767 5106 1610 1810 8 1604 1810 397 354 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 1124 331 129 1176 4 472 0 205 1 1 2 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1675 1598 1767 1702 1610 1810 0 1611 1810 397 354 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 19.8 18.0 6.5 18.4 0.2 22.9 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.2 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 19.8 18.0 6.5 18.4 0.2 22.9 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.2 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 15 1189 378 157 1620 511 503 0 789 13 87 78 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.95 0.88 0.82 0.73 0.01 0.94 0.00 0.26 0.08 0.01 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 111 1189 378 157 1620 511 503 0 789 111 87 78 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.3 33.8 33.1 40.3 27.3 21.0 31.8 0.0 13.6 44.4 27.5 27.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 15.9 23.6 28.1 1.7 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.8 2.7 0.2 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 9.6 9.2 4.0 7.5 0.1 13.3 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.3 49.6 56.6 68.4 28.9 21.0 57.5 0.0 14.4 47.1 27.8 28.4 LnGrp LOS D D E E C C E A B D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1457 1309 677 4
Approach Delay, s/veh 51.2 32.8 44.4 32.9
Approach LOS D C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.6 48.1 12.0 25.3 29.0 23.7 4.7 32.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 38.7 7.5 20.8 24.5 19.2 5.0 23.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 8.8 8.5 21.8 24.9 2.4 2.1 20.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.9
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4316 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements - AM 9: Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 516 57 42 461 15 49 202 46 11 165 125 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 516 57 42 461 15 49 202 46 11 165 125 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1885 1796 1870 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 543 60 44 485 16 52 213 48 12 174 132 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 7 2 0
Cap, veh/h 579 739 82 148 646 20 182 341 70 563 502 432 Arrive On Green 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 904 1667 184 54 1458 46 175 1270 262 1074 1870 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 0 603 545 0 0 313 0 0 12 174 132 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 904 0 1852 1557 0 0 1708 0 0 1074 1870 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 8.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 8.4 9.9 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.3 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 0.08 0.03 0.17 0.15 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 579 0 821 815 0 0 593 0 0 563 502 432 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.73 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.35 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 699 0 1067 1039 0 0 1097 0 0 893 1078 928 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 0.0 7.2 7.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 9.2 9.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.0 2.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.2 0.0 9.1 8.2 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 8.4 9.6 9.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A B A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 745 545 313 318
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 8.2 10.8 9.5
Approach LOS A A B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 18.3 12.9 18.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 10.4 4.3 11.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 2.9 1.2 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.0
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4317 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements - AM 13: State St & W Community College Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 0 23 25 2 90 11 1473 150 73 614 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 0 23 25 2 90 11 1473 150 73 614 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1307 1885 1885 1900 1856 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 6 0 24 26 2 95 12 1551 158 77 646 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 1 1 0 3 0
Cap, veh/h 166 13 150 382 21 188 505 1924 194 295 2071 937 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 208 108 1265 1311 180 1585 545 3275 330 290 3526 1595 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 30 0 0 28 0 95 12 840 869 77 646 2 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1581 0 0 1491 0 1585 545 1791 1814 290 1763 1595 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.3 11.2 11.6 6.4 2.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.7 3.2 11.2 11.6 18.0 2.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.20 0.80 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 329 0 0 404 0 188 505 1052 1065 295 2071 937 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.50 0.02 0.80 0.82 0.26 0.31 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1052 0 0 1077 0 931 505 1052 1065 295 2071 937 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.1 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 12.7 4.0 4.9 5.0 12.8 3.2 2.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 4.4 5.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.3 2.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.2 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 14.7 4.0 9.3 10.0 13.3 3.3 2.6 LnGrp LOS B A A B A B A A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 30 123 1721 725
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.2 14.1 9.6 4.3
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 8.1 22.5 8.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.6 2.5 20.0 3.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.7 0.1 0.0 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.4
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4318 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements - AM 14: State St & W Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 255 687 547 384 1124 630 284 733 142 157 472 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 255 687 547 384 1124 630 284 733 142 157 472 63 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1841 1841 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 1870 1856 1870 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 268 723 576 404 1183 663 299 772 149 165 497 66 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 4 4 2 2 0 1 1 2 3 2 4
Cap, veh/h 305 1595 716 378 1732 740 236 1034 451 193 948 381 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.27 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 3483 5025 1558 3456 5106 1609 1795 3582 1562 1767 3554 1556 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 268 723 576 404 1183 663 299 772 149 165 497 66 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1742 1675 1558 1728 1702 1609 1795 1791 1562 1767 1777 1556 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 10.5 29.0 10.0 18.2 31.0 12.0 17.9 6.9 8.4 10.9 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 10.5 29.0 10.0 18.2 31.0 12.0 17.9 6.9 8.4 10.9 3.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 305 1595 716 378 1732 740 236 1034 451 193 948 381 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.45 0.80 1.07 0.68 0.90 1.27 0.75 0.33 0.85 0.52 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 305 1595 716 378 1732 740 236 1568 684 193 1478 613 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.2 24.9 21.2 40.7 26.0 22.7 39.7 29.5 25.6 40.0 28.6 27.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.3 0.1 6.2 65.6 0.9 13.3 149.8 0.4 0.2 27.8 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.9 4.1 11.1 7.6 7.3 14.9 15.0 7.5 2.5 5.1 4.6 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.5 24.9 27.3 106.3 26.9 36.0 189.5 29.9 25.7 67.8 28.7 27.3 LnGrp LOS E C C F C D F C C E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1567 2250 1220 728
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.6 43.8 68.5 37.4
Approach LOS C D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s14.0 33.0 16.0 28.4 12.0 35.0 14.0 30.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s9.0 27.0 11.0 36.0 7.0 29.0 9.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.0 31.0 14.0 12.9 9.0 33.0 10.4 19.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.2
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4319 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements - AM 32: Cawston Ave & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 AM - Intersection Improvements Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 221 177 204 237 15 73 80 129 9 129 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 59 221 177 204 237 15 73 80 129 9 129 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1885 1870 1856 1885 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 62 233 186 215 249 16 77 84 136 9 136 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 213 372 267 449 379 21 623 436 373 158 281 128 Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 127 914 657 594 931 53 1178 1856 1587 36 1196 544 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 481 0 0 480 0 0 77 84 136 209 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1698 0 0 1577 0 0 1178 1856 1587 1776 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.13 0.39 0.45 0.03 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.31
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 853 0 0 849 0 0 623 436 373 567 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.36 0.37 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1351 0 0 1257 0 0 1189 1328 1136 1409 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 7.8 7.9 8.6 8.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 481 480 297 209
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.7 6.6 8.2 8.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 14.7 10.4 14.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 7.6 4.5 7.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 2.4 0.9 2.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4320 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 3: Warren Rd & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 176 11 159 171 48 10 386 367 144 378 140 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 176 11 159 171 48 10 386 367 144 378 140 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 60 185 12 167 180 51 11 406 386 152 398 147 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 260 684 45 464 393 111 109 872 683 396 618 228 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 415 2481 164 1204 1424 403 14 1841 1442 696 1305 482 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 0 124 167 0 231 417 0 386 152 0 545 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1360 0 1699 1204 0 1827 1854 0 1442 696 0 1786 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 2.1 4.5 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 6.9 7.2 0.0 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 2.1 6.6 0.0 3.8 5.4 0.0 6.9 14.1 0.0 8.3 Prop In Lane 0.45 0.10 1.00 0.22 0.03 1.00 1.00 0.27
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 521 0 469 464 0 504 981 0 683 396 0 846 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.36 0.00 0.46 0.42 0.00 0.56 0.38 0.00 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 854 0 851 735 0 915 1030 0 722 415 0 895 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.2 0.0 10.2 12.7 0.0 10.8 6.4 0.0 6.8 11.9 0.0 7.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.0 1.2 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.0 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.4 0.0 10.5 13.2 0.0 11.4 6.7 0.0 7.7 12.5 0.0 8.6 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 257 398 803 697
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 12.2 7.2 9.5
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.5 14.4 21.5 14.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.9 5.9 16.1 8.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.6 1.1 0.9 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.2
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4321 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 8: Lyon Ave/Potter Rd & Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 1400 493 145 994 3 422 3 127 5 8 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 1400 493 145 994 3 422 3 127 5 8 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 907 1885 1870 1900 1870 1900 1885 1411 1411 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 1474 519 153 1046 3 444 3 134 5 8 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 67 1 2 0 2 0 1 33 33 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 9 1504 453 165 1907 601 441 11 490 22 359 274 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.37 0.37 0.25 0.42 0.41 0.01 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 864 5147 1551 1810 5106 1610 1795 26 1173 1810 1948 1489 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 3 1474 519 153 1046 3 444 0 137 5 7 8 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 864 1716 1551 1810 1702 1610 1795 0 1200 1810 1805 1632 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 24.3 25.0 7.2 13.8 0.1 21.0 0.0 6.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 24.3 25.0 7.2 13.8 0.1 21.0 0.0 6.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.91
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 9 1504 453 165 1907 601 441 0 501 22 332 301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.98 1.14 0.93 0.55 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.27 0.22 0.02 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 56 1504 453 165 1907 601 441 0 501 116 426 385 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.1 30.0 30.3 38.6 21.1 16.8 32.3 0.0 16.6 41.8 28.6 28.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.0 19.0 88.4 49.3 0.3 0.0 44.8 0.0 1.3 4.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 12.2 20.1 5.4 5.3 0.0 14.3 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.1 49.0 118.7 87.9 21.5 16.8 77.1 0.0 17.9 46.8 28.6 28.8 LnGrp LOS E D F F C B F A B D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1996 1202 581 20
Approach Delay, s/veh 67.1 29.9 63.1 33.2
Approach LOS E C E C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.1 39.7 11.8 29.0 25.0 19.8 4.8 36.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.0 35.2 7.3 24.5 20.5 19.7 5.0 26.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.2 8.5 9.2 27.0 23.0 2.3 2.3 15.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 54.6
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4322 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 9: Lyon Ave & Cottonwood Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 73 257 34 191 225 246 28 65 272 237 66 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 73 257 34 191 225 246 28 65 272 237 66 56 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 77 271 36 201 237 259 29 68 286 249 69 59 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Cap, veh/h 375 669 89 538 337 368 137 113 390 549 597 510 Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 916 1630 216 1089 820 896 62 356 1231 1043 1885 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 0 307 201 0 496 383 0 0 249 69 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 916 0 1846 1089 0 1716 1649 0 0 1043 1885 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 0.0 3.9 5.3 0.0 7.9 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.4 0.0 3.9 9.2 0.0 7.9 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.9 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.52 0.08 0.75 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 375 0 758 538 0 705 639 0 0 549 597 510 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.40 0.37 0.00 0.70 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.12 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 498 0 1007 684 0 936 1010 0 0 788 1028 878 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.4 0.0 6.9 10.1 0.0 8.1 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 8.0 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.3 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.6 0.0 7.2 10.5 0.0 9.6 10.9 0.0 0.0 10.7 8.1 8.1 LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 384 697 383 377
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.3 9.9 10.9 9.8
Approach LOS A A B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.9 18.1 14.9 18.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 12.4 9.0 11.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 1.1 1.2 2.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.8
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4323 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 10: Lyon Ave & 7th St
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 344 26 62 386 50 44 238 42 40 221 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 344 26 62 386 50 44 238 42 40 221 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1885 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1856 1900 1856 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 362 27 65 406 53 46 251 44 42 233 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 0 3 9
Cap, veh/h 645 701 52 190 578 71 188 464 447 412 530 425 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 946 1732 129 125 1428 175 157 1625 1564 1098 1856 1489 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 0 389 524 0 0 297 0 44 42 233 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 946 0 1861 1728 0 0 1782 0 1564 1098 1856 1489 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 4.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 1.0 3.0 0.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 0.0 4.6 7.3 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.6 4.9 3.0 0.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 645 0 753 838 0 0 652 0 447 412 530 425 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.52 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.44 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 849 0 1154 1195 0 0 1224 0 970 780 1150 923 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.2 0.0 6.5 7.2 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 7.6 10.9 8.5 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 1.1 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.2 0.0 7.1 8.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 7.7 11.0 9.1 7.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 405 524 341 290
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.0 8.0 9.1 9.3
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 16.2 12.8 16.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 6.6 6.9 9.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 1.9 1.1 2.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.2
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4324 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 13: State St & W Community College Dr
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 2 30 76 0 64 36 898 66 80 1184 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 2 30 76 0 64 36 898 66 80 1184 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1900 1870 1870 1900 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 2 32 80 0 67 38 945 69 84 1246 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0
Cap, veh/h 0 13 205 416 0 213 393 1836 134 463 1963 882 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 96 1529 1204 0 1585 453 3352 245 564 3582 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 34 80 0 67 38 501 513 84 1246 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1625 1204 0 1585 453 1777 1819 564 1791 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.5 0.0 1.1 1.8 5.0 5.0 3.1 6.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.0 1.1 8.6 5.0 5.0 8.1 6.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 218 416 0 213 393 974 997 463 1963 882 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.19 0.00 0.32 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.18 0.63 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1033 1117 0 1008 433 1130 1157 513 2278 1024 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 10.8 11.7 0.0 11.1 7.4 4.0 4.0 6.6 4.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 11.2 12.0 0.0 11.9 7.5 4.5 4.4 6.8 4.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A B B A B A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 34 147 1052 1330
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.2 11.9 4.6 5.0
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 8.3 20.0 8.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.6 2.5 10.1 4.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.0 0.1 5.3 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.3
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4325 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 14: State St & W Ramona Expy/Ramona Expy
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 172 1152 479 181 688 247 530 731 172 439 731 177 Future Volume (veh/h) 172 1152 479 181 688 247 530 731 172 439 731 177 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1870 1870 1885 1856 1870 1870 1885 1885 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 181 1213 504 191 724 260 558 769 181 462 769 186 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 0
Cap, veh/h 259 1255 891 211 1190 787 557 1089 486 479 934 386 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.27 0.26 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 5147 1573 3456 5147 1540 1781 3554 1587 1795 3582 1574 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 181 1213 504 191 724 260 558 769 181 462 769 186 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1716 1573 1728 1716 1540 1781 1777 1587 1795 1791 1574 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 30.6 27.0 7.2 16.5 13.2 41.0 25.1 11.7 33.3 26.5 13.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 30.6 27.0 7.2 16.5 13.2 41.0 25.1 11.7 33.3 26.5 13.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 259 1255 891 211 1190 787 557 1089 486 479 934 386 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.97 0.57 0.91 0.61 0.33 1.00 0.71 0.37 0.96 0.82 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 321 1255 891 211 1190 787 557 1192 532 479 1037 432 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.3 49.1 18.3 61.2 45.1 19.3 45.1 40.3 35.6 47.5 45.7 42.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 17.8 0.5 36.6 0.7 0.1 38.7 1.4 0.2 31.9 4.5 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.1 15.1 9.8 4.2 7.1 4.7 24.0 11.2 4.6 19.1 12.3 5.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.5 66.8 18.9 97.9 45.8 19.4 83.8 41.6 35.8 79.4 50.1 42.7 LnGrp LOS E E B F D B F D D E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1898 1175 1508 1417
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.7 48.4 56.6 58.7
Approach LOS D D E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.0 36.0 45.0 38.2 13.7 34.3 39.0 44.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.0 30.0 40.0 36.0 11.0 26.0 34.0 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.2 32.6 43.0 28.5 8.6 18.5 35.3 27.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.1 2.5 0.0 3.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 54.6
HCM 6th LOS D

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4326 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 32: Cawston Ave & Esplanade Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 54 429 78 111 222 42 59 70 81 21 104 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 54 429 78 111 222 42 59 70 81 21 104 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1870 1870 1870 1870 1885 1900 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 452 82 117 234 44 62 74 85 22 109 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 0 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 190 641 110 324 507 82 584 406 340 176 235 107 Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 93 1435 246 334 1136 184 1218 1885 1577 117 1092 498 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 591 0 0 395 0 0 62 74 85 185 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1775 0 0 1654 0 0 1218 1885 1577 1706 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.2 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 1.2 2.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.10 0.14 0.30 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.12 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 941 0 0 913 0 0 584 406 340 519 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.18 0.25 0.36 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1337 0 0 1230 0 0 1145 1275 1066 1286 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 8.5 8.5 8.7 9.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 8.6 8.7 9.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 591 395 221 185
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.7 5.5 8.8 9.6
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.2 16.4 10.2 16.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 9.2 4.5 6.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 2.7 0.8 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.1
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4327 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Proposed GPU 2040 PM - PM 34: Ramona Blvd & Lyon Ave
San Jacinto GPU 5:00 pm 06/10/2019 Proposed GPU 2040 PM Synchro 10 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 396 2 99 383 112 3 60 91 79 46 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 396 2 99 383 112 3 60 91 79 46 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1870 1870 1870 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 417 2 104 403 118 3 63 96 83 48 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Cap, veh/h 150 871 4 241 559 150 138 127 189 342 120 49 Arrive On Green 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 24 1825 9 179 1171 314 14 671 997 727 632 259 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 435 0 0 625 0 0 162 0 0 156 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1857 0 0 1664 0 0 1682 0 0 1618 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.04 0.00 0.17 0.19 0.02 0.59 0.53 0.16
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1024 0 0 949 0 0 455 0 0 511 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1366 0 0 1249 0 0 1253 0 0 1197 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.8 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.1 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A B A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 435 625 162 156
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.1 6.5 10.3 10.0
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.6 17.4 9.6 17.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 6.2 4.0 10.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 2.1 0.7 2.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.9
HCM 6th LOS A

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 4328 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix G - Transportation Impact Analysis (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) Appendix H: Tribal Consultation
Communications

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 4329 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix H - Tribal Consultation Communications (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 4330 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix H - Tribal Consultation Communications (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
Cultural and Environmental Department
1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Phone: (916) 373-3710
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.nahc.ca.gov
August 14, 2019
Travis Randel
City of San Jacinto
VIA Email to: [email protected]
RE: Native American Consultation, Pursuant to Senate Bill 18 (SB18), Government Codes §65352.3 and §65352.4, as well as Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), Public Resources Codes §21080.1, §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2, General Plan 2040 – Envision San Jacinto Project, Riverside County Dear Mr. Randel:

Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties or projects.

Government Codes §65352.3 and §65352.4 require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to cultural places when creating or amending General Plans, Specific Plans and Community Plans.

Public Resources Codes §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2 requires public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources as defined, for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects.

The law does not preclude local governments and agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction. The NAHC believes that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law.

Best practice for the AB52 process and in accordance with Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(d), is to do the following:

Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that lead agencies include in their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential affect (APE), such as:

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 4331 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix H - Tribal Consultation Communications (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040)

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:
▪ A listing of any and all known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;
▪ Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; ▪ Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and
▪ If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:
▪ Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code Section 6254.10.

3. The result of the Sacred Lands File (SFL) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission. The request form can be found at http://nahc.ca.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2015/08/Local-Government-Tribal-Consultation-List-Request-Form-update.pdf.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS is not exhaustive, and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event, that they do, having the information beforehand well help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC.

With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Steven Quinn
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
Attachment

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 4332 Attachment: Draft EIR Appendix H - Tribal Consultation Communications (Envision San Jacinto - General Plan 2040) STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 2 ends

San Jacinto City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

San Jacinto City Council
November 15, 2022