Agenda packet, regular meeting — Roseville City Council, June 17, 2026 (part 16 of 22)

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005348

No auto required
Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:_X___
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX. Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 9 Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2392 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005348

Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 10 Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E Chief Legal &Administrative Officer
Global Vice President - Bulk Chemical Distribution
5/14/2026
Gary Gable
5/18/2026
Alexa Colin

Page 2393 of 3513 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4749B558-6FCA-43A5-91D4-B595639FE9FA

April, 2022
RE: Contractor and Grantee Compliance with Economic Sanctions Imposed in Response to Russia’s Actions in Ukraine
Dear Vendor:

On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-6-22 (EO) regarding sanctions in response to Russian aggression in Ukraine. The EO is located at https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/3.4.22-Russia-Ukraine-ExecutiveOrder.pdf.

The EO directs all agencies and departments that are subject to the Governor’s authority to take certain immediate steps, including notifying all contractors and grantees of their obligations to comply with existing economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law.

This correspondence serves as a notice under the EO that as a contractor or grantee, compliance with the economic sanctions imposed in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine is required, including with respect to, but not limited to, the federal executive orders identified in the EO and the sanctions identified on the U.S. Department of the Treasury website (https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/sanctionsprograms-and-country-information/ukraine-russia-related-sanctions). Failure to comply may result in the termination of contracts or grants, as applicable.

Please note that for any agreements or grants valued at $5 million or more you must report to the City of Roseville your compliance with economic sanctions including steps you have taken in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, including, but not limited to, desisting from making new investments in, or engaging in financial transactions with, Russian entities, not transferring technology to Russia or Russian entities, and directly providing support to the government and people of Ukraine.

Sincerely,
4/25/2022
Shannon Wiest
City of Roseville
Purchasing and Warehouse Manager
Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2394 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2395 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2396 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2397 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2398 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2399 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2400 of 3513 ends

Docusign Envelope ID: 799BA11F-D91E-8489-8234-E540274FD82E

Page 2401 of 3513 ends

Bay Area Clean Water Agencies
Bid Results for Project 12-2026 SODIUM HYDROXIDE
Bid Due on February 19, 2026 4:00 PM (PDT)

REGIONAL BID AWARD
Section SODIUM HYDROXIDE 20% (Caustic) SODIUM HYDROXIDE 25% (Caustic) SODIUM HYDROXIDE 30% (Caustic) SODIUM HYDROXIDE 50% (Caustic) Description Marin Sonoma Napa Sacramento Central Valley Marin Sonoma
Napa Peninsula Sacramento South Bay Tri Valley
Marin Sonoma
Napa North Bay Sacramento Central Valley East Bay
Marin
Sonoma Napa North Bay Sacramento South Bay Tri Valley
Unit of Measure dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton dry ton Univar Solutions USA LLC. 1,690.2500 896.0600 1,110.2600 879.7300 880.2800 886.0900 1,165.4700 837.4400 1,322.3600 859.4600 860.9800 712.8400 706.4300 699.1400 689.5000 751.4800 1,091.0600 700.7500 Brenntag Pacific, LLC 2,732.0000 3,032.0000 830.0000 980.0000 920.0000 1,000.0000 1,420.0000 820.0000 2,799.0000 883.0000 1,000.0000 833.0000 800.0000 1,515.0000 795.0000 835.0000 804.0000 795.0000 *Highligted bid prices are only to show the apparent low bid and should not be construed as any indication that BACC has accepted such bid as responsive; see bid review for award recommendation.

Per Section 2.16 Method of Award
Bids may be awarded by the participating BACC agencies to the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder for each listed region meeting the specifications for bulk loads for the chemical. The lowest responsive bidder for this chemical will be determined for each region listed on the Bid Form.

The bidder that meets the specifications and submits the lowest overall bid price for a particular region may be awarded the bid by the participating agencies in that region, assuming the bid is determined by BACC to be complete and in compliance with the bid requirements. The lowest overall bid price for each region will be determined by multiplying the estimated annual quantity for each participating agency within the particular region by the bid prices for the region, and adding up the aggregate cost.

APPARENT LOWEST OVERALL BID PRICE FOR EACH REGION (LOWEST AGGREGATE COST PER REGION) CENTRAL VALLEY 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL dry ton 435 365 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR PER Dry ton COST PER Dry ton COST PER Dry ton COST PER dry ton COST REGION Univar Solutions USA LLC. 1,110.2600 $482,963.10 712.8400 $260,186.60 $743,149.70 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 830.0000 $361,050.00 833.0000 $304,045.00 $665,095.00 EAST BAY 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 866 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR
PER Dry Ton COST REGION
Univar Solutions USA LLC. 706.4300 $611,768.38 $611,768.38 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 800.0000 $692,800.00 $692,800.00 MARIN SONOMA NAPA 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 23 70 13 2,050 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST REGION Univar Solutions USA LLC. $1,690.25000 38875.75 $879.7300 $61,581.10 $1,322.3600 $17,190.68 $699.1400 $1,433,237.00 $1,550,884.53 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. $2,732.00000 62836.00 $980.0000 $68,600.00 $2,799.0000 $36,387.00 $1,515.0000 $3,105,750.00 $3,273,573.00 NORTH BAY 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 2,658 965 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR
PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST REGION
Univar Solutions USA LLC. $859.4600 $2,284,444.68 $689.5000 $665,367.50 $2,949,812.18 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. $883.0000 $2,347,014.00 $795.0000 $767,175.00 $3,114,189.00 Peninsula 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 450 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR
PER Dry Ton COST REGION
Univar Solutions USA LLC. 880.2800 $396,126.00 $396,126.00 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 920.0000 $414,000.00 $414,000.00 SACRAMENTO 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 8 881 167 2,440 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST REGION Univar Solutions USA LLC. 896.0600 $7,168.48 886.0900 $780,645.29 860.9800 $143,783.66 751.4800 $1,833,611.20 $2,765,208.63 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 3032.0000 $24,256.00 1000.0000 $881,000.00 1000.0000 $167,000.00 835.0000 $2,037,400.00 $3,109,656.00 SOUTH BAY 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 279 1,105 AGGREGATE

BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR
PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST REGION
Univar Solutions USA LLC. 1165.4700 $325,166.13 $1,091.0600 $1,205,621.30 $1,530,787.43 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 1420.0000 $396,180.00 $804.0000 $888,420.00 $1,284,600.00 TRI VALLEY 20% CAUSTIC 25% CAUSTIC 30% CAUSTIC 50% CAUSTIC TOTAL EST ANNUAL QTY Dry Ton 372 607 OVERALL

BID PRICE TOTAL EST BID PRICE TOTAL EST COST FOR
PER Dry Ton COST PER Dry Ton COST REGION
Univar Solutions USA LLC. $837.44000 $311,527.68 $700.75000 $425,355.25 $736,882.93 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. $820.00000 $305,040.00 $795.00000 $482,565.00 $787,605.00 TOTAL EST QTY Dry Ton 31 2,487 2,838 8,398
CHECK: BID DOC TOTALS 31 2,487 2,838 8,398

Page 2402 of 3513 ends

Bay Area Clean Water Agencies
Bid Results for Project 12-2026 SODIUM HYDROXIDE
Bid Due on February 19, 2026 4:00 PM (PT)

REGIONAL AWARD
Item #

BACC RECOMMENDATION
1 Received via bid platform by bid deadline above
2 Bids submitted on forms provided
3 Must include a base unit price for each geographic area 4 Additional charges for "short load" deliveries shown as a standard deviation on bid form
5 References: minimum of 3
6 Product Specification Deviations - if any, proposed specification must be attached 7 Fully Executed Standard Agreement
8 Fully Executed Non-Collusion Affidavit
9 For potable application only: Affidavit of Compliance to AWWA and/or NSF standard or Statement by chemical manufacturer, signed on letterhead attesting to the affidavit's validity or current printout from NSF.org
10 Representative lab analysis of the chemical prepared by reputable outside laboratory or ISO Certified
11 Name /Address of chemical manufacturer
12 Product Bulletin and Typical Properties
13 Safety Data Sheet (SDS)
14 Addendum/Addenda Acknowledgement
15 Third Party Hauler? If applicable, name, address, Affidavit signed by Bidder 16 Specific Deviations Noted
4 & 16

Page 2403 of 3513 ends

Page 2404 of 3513 ends

#11 Univar

Page 2405 of 3513 ends

Univar Brenntag
Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder for 20%
inMarin Sonoma Napa and Sacramento, for 25% in
Marin Sonoma Napa, Peninusla, Sacramento and
Tri Valley, for 30% in Marin Sonoma Napa, North
Bay, Sacramento, and 50% in East Bay, Marin
Sonoma Napa, North Bay, Sacramento and Tri
Valley
Lowest responsive responsible bidder for 25% in
Central Valley and South Bay, and for 50% in
Central Valley and South Bay
y y
y y
y y
y see below
none
y y
Yes - see below
none
y y
y no
y
y
y
y
Univar & K2 same
y y
y y
yes yes
Chemical Transfer, Bulk Transportation, Quality
Carriers, RJs none
yes - see below none
6

Page 2406 of 3513 ends

Page 2407 of 3513 ends

Page 2408 of 3513 ends

Page 2409 of 3513 ends

Page 2410 of 3513 ends

Page 2411 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.37
File #: 0203-03
Item ID: 2026-464
Title: Sodium Hypochlorite (BACC 13-2026) - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Becky Philipp 916-746-1110 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Pioneer Americas LLC, doing business as Olin Finance Company, in the amount of $1,802,000 for the supply and delivery of sodium hypochlorite for FY2026-27. The chemical will be used at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, Roseville Energy Park, groundwater well sites, West Side Tank and Pump Station, Johnson Pool, Mike Shellito Pool, and the Roseville Aquatic Complex. Sufficient funding is included in the Environmental Utilities, Electric, and Parks, Recreation and Libraries Departments' proposed FY2026-27 budgets for this purchase.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Contract Purchase Agreement (3005349) with Pioneer Americas LLC, doing business as Olin Finance Company, as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC) Bid No. 13-2026 for the supply and delivery of sodium hypochlorite and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff further requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager or his or her designee to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, Roseville Energy Park, groundwater well sites, West Side Tank and Pump Station, Johnson Pool, Mike Shellito Pool, and the Roseville Aquatic Complex have ongoing needs for sodium hypochlorite (chlorine), which is used to maintain water quality standards and provide disinfection at these facilities. The chemical is purchased on an as-needed basis throughout the year.

In February 2026, the City participated in a regional chemical procurement led by the Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC), with the Bay Area Clean Water Agency serving as the coordinating agency. BACC is an informal cooperative of Northern California water and wastewater agencies that combines chemical purchases through competitive bidding. By aggregating demand from more than 50 participating agencies, BACC increases purchasing power and achieves cost savings that benefit utility customers.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY2026-27 not-to-exceed amount is $1,802,000. Funding is included in the proposed FY2026-27 Environmental Utilities, Electric, and Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Departments' budgets. Projected

Page 2412 of 3513 ends

spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2027-28, $1,982,200; FY2028-29, $2,180,420; and FY2029-30, $2,398,462.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)). The hauling and delivery of hazardous substances is regulated by the state. Hazardous material transport consistent with applicable safety regulations should not result in a significant environmental effect. Therefore, the proposed contract purchase agreement does not include the potential for significant environmental effect and is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Becky Philipp, Purchasing Supervisor
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-207

2. Contract Purchase Agreement

3. Bid Summary Sheet
REVIEWERS:

Becky Philipp, Finance Department - Purchasing Created/Initiated - 5/20/2026 Shannon Wiest, Finance Department - Purchasing Approved - 5/27/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 5/28/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/4/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2413 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-207

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY

OF ROSEVILLE AND PIONEER AMERICAS LLC DBA OLIN FINANCE COMPANY, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005349) for Sodium Hypochlorite (BACC 13-2026), by and between the City of Roseville and Pioneer Americas LLC dba Olin Finance Company, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2414 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349
Supplier Details:

Company Pioneer Americas LLC dba Olin Finance Company LLC Contact Patrick Schumacher
Address 490 Stuart Rd NE
Cleveland, TN 37312
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact "Becky" Rebecca Philipp
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1110
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1

Page 2415 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349
Agreement 3005349
Agreement Date 01-MAY-2026
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 1,802,000.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Pioneer Americas LLC dba Olin Finance
Company LLC
490 Stuart Rd NE
Cleveland, TN 37312
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(423) 336-4421
(423) 336-4682
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
Vendor shall provide and delivery 12.5% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) at a cost of $3.545 per gallon to various locations in Roseville in accordance with all specifications, attachments and terms and conditions of BACC Bid No. 13-2026 and the attached "2026 BACC Chemical Bid Specific Deviation" of BACC Bid No.13-2026 - Sodium Hypochlorite". All deliveries must be made Monday - Friday between the hours of 7:00 a. m. and 3:00 p.m. unless otherwise specified.

Contact Jason Fick for PGWWTP at 916-746-1941 or [email protected], Drew Yarbrough for REP at 916-746-1656 or [email protected], Stephen Peterson for WTP at 916-746-1996 or [email protected], Steven Rhoden in Parks at 916-746-1130 or [email protected] and John Tadlock for WST & Wells at 916- 223-7529 or [email protected] for questions.
*Total cost listed is an approximation only. The City does not guarantee whatsoever the actual value of this agreement.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 15640 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
01-Jul-2026 30-Jun-2027 "Becky" Rebecca Philipp Phone 1-916-746-1110 Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2

Page 2416 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

Contract Terms and Conditions

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Contractor's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Contractor is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Contractor acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Contractor has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement.

9. All fair employment practices must be adhered to. In addition, if the project referenced on this service agreement is a Public Works project, all prevailing wage laws must be complied with. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir. ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm. In compliance with Labor Code Section 1773.2, as may be amended from time to time, Contractor shall cause a copy of this website to be posted at each jobsite, as applicable.

10. Contractor agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage.
b. Form. Contractor shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management 3

Page 2417 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

and the City Attorney.
c. Additional Insureds. Contractor shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Contractor. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor's work. Furthermore, Contractor shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under this Agreement.

Additionally, Contractor shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all work performed by Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors. i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances, including 4

Page 2418 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

but not limited to the City's storm water regulations, as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement. Refer to www.roseville. ca.us/stormwater for links to more information on the City's storm water regulations.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by email delivery of a ".pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original hereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

19. Contractor/consultant's duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications, if any, shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.

20. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

21. Contractor certifies that Contractor, its employees, directors, officers, agents, 5

Page 2419 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension, or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.

22. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to City elected or appointed officers totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months prior to the City decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by Contractor and/or its agent(s), Contractor is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at: https://www.roseville.ca.
us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.

23. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

24. CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONTRACTOR and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that: (a) CONTRACTOR is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONTRACTOR is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONTRACTOR has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONTRACTOR maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONTRACTOR actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONTRACTOR advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONTRACTOR provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONTRACTOR has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONTRACTOR set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONTRACTOR has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

25. If Contractor produces any "web content" pursuant to this Agreement, as that term is defined in section 35.104 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended, Contractor shall ensure that any such web content is in full compliance with all applicable requirements of the most current version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Code of Federal Regulations and/or California law. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, or expenses arising out of Contractor's failure to comply with such requirements. This provision shall survive expiration and/or termination of this Agreement.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
6

Page 2420 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

___________ Sole Proprietor
City Reserves the right to withhold any payments to contractor in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.

General T&C
REV 3/16/26 JS
7

Page 2421 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
8

Page 2422 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349

Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:__X__
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 9

Page 2423 of 3513 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005349
Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 10 Deon Carter
VP & President, Chlor Alkali Products & Vinyls

05.15.2026

Page 2424 of 3513 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4749B558-6FCA-43A5-91D4-B595639FE9FA

April, 2022
RE: Contractor and Grantee Compliance with Economic Sanctions Imposed in Response to Russia’s Actions in Ukraine
Dear Vendor:

Sincerely,
4/25/2022
Shannon Wiest
City of Roseville
Purchasing and Warehouse Manager

Page 2425 of 3513 ends

Page 2426 of 3513 ends

1692799v1

BIDDER INFORMATION

1. Legal Name of Bidder:
______________________________________________________________________________

2. Bidder’s Street Address:
______________________________________________________________________________

3. Mailing Address:
______________________________________________________________________________

4. Business Telephone: _______________ Fax Number: ________________

5. Type of Supplier:
□ Sole Proprietor □ Partnership □ Corporation □ LLC
If Corporation, indicate State where incorporated: ____________________

6. Business License Number issued by the City where the Supplier’s principal place of business is located.

Number: ____________________ Issuing City: _____________________

7. Supplier Federal Tax Identification Number: ____________________________

8. Emergency Contact: Name: ____________________________________ Phone Number: ______________________________

9. Order Contact: Name: _______________________________________ Address: _______________________________________
Phone Number: ___________ Fax Number: ____________
Email: __________________________________________

10. References:

Company/Agency Name Contact Name Phone Number
1)_________________________ ___________________ _____________ 2) _________________________ ___________________ _____________ 3) _________________________ ___________________ ______________

11. Chemical Manufacturer’s name and address (if different from Bidder):
__________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ 51 Pioneer Americas LLC is a wholly subsidiary of Olin Corporation 16290 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77094
16290 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77094
(423) 336-4421 (423) 336-4682
X
Virginia
12082L Pittsburg, CA
06-1420850
Chemtrec
(800) 424-9300
Olin Customer Service
16290 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77094
(833) 370-3737 (866) 449-8036
[email protected]
City of Roseville Becky Philipp, Buyer II (916) 746-1110 City of Santa Rosa Jennifer Myles, Sr. Buyer (707) 543-3709 Modesto Irrigation District Daryn Weese, Buyer (209) 526-7685 K2 Pure Solutions
950 Loveridge Rd.

Pittsburg, CA 94565

Page 2427 of 3513 ends

1186 Lower River Road, Charleston, TN 37310
Phone: 423-336-4421 / Fax : 423-336-4682
Internet Address: www.olinchloralkali.com
Form Rev.: Nov. 2014
2026 BACC Chemical Bid Specific Deviation
BACC Bid 13-2026 – Sodium Hypochlorite
Olin is the largest producer/supplier of bulk sodium hypochlorite to municipal water treatment in North America and the state of California. We have successfully serviced the requirements of most of the BACC membership at one time or another in recent years. Olin looks forward to negotiating with individual BACC members to develop mutually agreeable terms and conditions for sale of sodium hypochlorite. We are committed to try to comply with the inclusive intent of this bid and shall continue to make all good faith efforts to mutually work individually with members of the BACC on servicing their unique requirements if recommended for award of their business. Since there are some individual requirements that are undisclosed or we may be unfamiliar with, if recommended for bid award, we will need to review and assess these case by case with individual members as advised in the bid. These may possibly include such things as follow:
• Unattended deliveries at unmanned sites to be deemed safe and mutually agreed upon case by case.
• Delivery requirements at new or unfamiliar remote sites requiring specialized metering or nonstandard bulk delivery equipment requirements to be assessed and agreed upon case by case.

Some member sites may not be serviceable by Olin after sites are reviewed and Olin reserves the right to make that determination.
• Product samples, when required for shipments, would need to be mutually agreed upon so as to provide a safe and secure process for samples to be supplied to protect drivers, site attendants and the environment.
• New delivery sites must successfully complete and meet Olin’s minimum safety and security requirements site questionnaire prior to first scheduled deliveries.

In addition, we would request consideration of the following issues:
• We would like to see the product specifications consistently align with meeting limits in current published NSF STD 60 and AWWA B-300-18 standards for 12.5 weight % sodium hypochlorite (including: pH of 12-14 to better align with free alkaline limits as noted in the bid; 12.5% AvCl minimum be revised to 11.9% AvCl (which equates to 12.5% NaOCl wt%); AvCl in gpl be removed or revised to match desired AvCl wt% and NaOCl wt%). Product is produced in a continuous manufacturing process to these quality certifications and making product to individual specifications by individual customer is not reasonably possible for standard operations. Our product specification and ISO lab analysis is included in the bid. • We would request “insoluble matter” be removed from individual COA’s reporting as this component is already managed through the “Filtration Limitations” testing noted on page 21. It cannot be analyzed and reported on the COA for every individual load without interrupting

Page 2428 of 3513 ends

1186 Lower River Road, Charleston, TN 37310
Phone: 423-336-4421 / Fax : 423-336-4682
Internet Address: www.olinchloralkali.com
Form Rev.: Nov. 2014
processes and timely delivery of orders. We have SPC data on regular sampling available upon request.
• Acceptance of orders delivered with a min. 72 hours ARO as a standard and 24 hours in emergencies.
• Acceptance of Olin corporate insurance coverages.
o Note: Olin does not maintain a separate pollution liability policy. The General Liability Policy contains coverage for Time Element/Sudden and Accidental Pollution Liability, and the Auto Liability Policy includes the Pollution Liability Broadened Coverage for Covered Autos (CA 9948).
o Insurance is Primary and Non-Contributory for Additional Insured's (applies to General Liability & Auto Liability only).
• We request the right by written notice to review and recover increases in the cost of products to Seller due to significant unanticipated increases in prevailing market energy costs effecting the costs of raw materials or finished product. Seller to provide reasonable explanations and independent public documentation for any requested price adjustments. • Full Truck-load Bulk Shipments – Bid pricing submitted is for bulk full truck-load, one-stop deliveries. Due to significant cost increases in transportation and fuel costs, additional adjustments for carrier charges for less than truck-load or split shipments may apply individually case by case as follows:
o Less than full truck-load shipments – Short shipments < 2,000 gals. may incur a $500 freight adder per shipment to the bulk delivered unit price upon invoice. o Mini-bulk Shipments – Shipments <1,500 gals. may incur a $800 freight adder per shipment to the delivered unit price upon invoice.
 Shipments of < 700 gals. may not physically be safely serviceable by Olin’s standard bulk tanker equipment. We can review any case by case. Olin reserves rights for final approval of very small aquatic and remote rural sites like Pt Reyes Station, Oakwood Lake Water well sites , City of Morgan Hill well sites, City of Stockton well sites, City of Turlock well sites, Roseville well sites, City of Morgan Hill well sites, DVC power plant, Contra Costa Water District pump stations, Diablo Water District, Pleasant Hill Aquatic, Yuba City swimming pool, Town of Discovery Bay and Dublin San Ramon Services District Reservoir 1A, 10A and 300B pumpstations. These type deliveries typically require specialized delivery equipment and we cannot safely service and meet min. Olin site safety requirements. If, at Olin’s sole discretion, it’s determined they can be safely serviceable with standard bulk delivery equipment, there will be a $2,200/ shipment freight surcharge plus stop charges added to base unit pricing per shipment for these specific requirements to cover the high-cost labor-intensive service required.

Page 2429 of 3513 ends

1186 Lower River Road, Charleston, TN 37310
Phone: 423-336-4421 / Fax : 423-336-4682
Internet Address: www.olinchloralkali.com
Form Rev.: Nov. 2014
 Split shipments involving more than one unloading stop per individual shipment may incur multi-stop carrier charges of $75/unloading stop after one free unloading stop per shipment.

Page 2430 of 3513 ends

Bay Area Clean Water Agencies
Bid Results for Project 13-2026 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 12.5% Bid Due on February 19, 2026 4:00 PM (PDT)

REGIONAL BID AWARD
Section SODIUM HY
Description Central Valley East Bay Marin Sonoma Napa
Unit of Measure gal gal gal
Pur Water LLC no bid 3.2000 no bid
DURRANI INVESTMENTS CORP 2.9000 3.0500 2.9500
Univar Solutions USA LLC. 3.4900 3.4700 3.4900
Olin Corporation 3.5450 3.5450 3.5450
Per Section 2.16 Method of Award
Bids may be awarded by the participating BACC agencies to the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder for each listed region meeting th will be determined for each region listed on the Bid Form. The bidder that meets the specifications and submits the lowest overall bid price f assuming the bid is determined by BACC to be complete and in compliance with the bid requirements. The lowest overall bid price for each agency within the particular region by the bid prices for the region, and adding up the aggregate cost. BACC has the right to delete terms o to waive irregularities in said bids.

Lowest responsive bid for each region
Section SODIUM HY
Description Central Valley East Bay Marin Sonoma Napa
Estimated annual quantity (in gals) 1,140,000 1,665,000 1,122,705 Pur Water LLC no bid $5,328,000.0000 no bid
DURRANI INVESTMENTS CORP $3,306,000.0000 $5,078,250.0000 $3,311,979.7500 Univar Solutions USA LLC. $3,978,600.0000 $5,777,550.0000 $3,918,240.4500 Olin Corporation $4,041,300.0000 $5,902,425.0000 $3,979,989.2250

Page 2431 of 3513 ends

North Bay Peninsula Sacramento South Bay Tri Valley
gal gal gal gal gal
no bid 3.2000 no bid no bid no bid

3.0000 3.2000 3.3000 3.1000 3.1500

3.4500 3.5200 3.6100 3.4500 3.5100

3.5450 3.5450 3.5450 3.5450 3.5450
North Bay Peninsula Sacramento South Bay Tri Valley
2,447,200 835,000 1,224,700 2,590,000 945,800
no bid $2,672,000.0000 no bid no bid no bid
$7,341,600.0000 $2,672,000.0000 $4,041,510.0000 $8,029,000.0000 $2,979,270.0000 $8,442,840.0000 $2,939,200.0000 $4,421,167.0000 $8,935,500.0000 $3,319,758.0000 $8,675,324.0000 $2,960,075.0000 $4,341,561.5000 $9,181,550.0000 $3,352,861.0000 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 12.5%
h listed region meeting the specifications for bulk loads for the chemical. The lowest responsive bidder for this chemical e lowest overall bid price for a particular region may be awarded the bid by the participating agencies in that region, overall bid price for each region will be determined by multiplying the estimated annual quantity for each participating the right to delete terms or options from the bid contract documents and reserves the right to reject any and all bids and SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 12.5%

Page 2432 of 3513 ends

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 12.5% In 275-gal totes
(Optional bid item)
Sodium Hypochlorite

12.5% In Carboys
(OPTIONAL BID ITEM)
SODIUM

HYPOCHLORITE

5.25% (Optional
bid item)
Central Valley North Bay Tri Valley Marin Sonoma Napa Sacramento gal gal gal gal
no bid no bid no bid no bid no bid *PurWater unresponsive m no bid no bid no bid no bid no bid *Durranni unresponsive bc no bid no bid no bid no bid no bid
no bid no bid no bid no bid 2.0000
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 12.5% In 275-gal totes
(Optional bid item)
Sodium Hypochlorite

12.5% In Carboys
(OPTIONAL BID ITEM)
SODIUM

HYPOCHLORITE

5.25% (Optional
bid item)
Central Valley North Bay Tri Valley Marin Sonoma Napa Sacramento Total 2,750 1,400 5 16,000 95,000 12,085,560
no bid no bid no bid no bid no bid
no bid no bid no bid no bid no bid
no bid no bid no bid no bid no bid
no bid no bid no bid no bid $190,000.0000

Page 2433 of 3513 ends

Bid
document
total
12,085,560
PurWater unresponsive missing geographic regions
Durranni unresponsive bc they provided quarterly pricing and irregular bc they did not provide or notorize required bid documents

Page 2434 of 3513 ends

red bid documents

Page 2435 of 3513 ends

Bay Area Clean Water Agencies
Bid Results for Project 13-2026 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 12.5% Bid Due on February 19, 2026 4:00 PM (PT)

REGIONAL AWARD
Item #

Page 2436 of 3513 ends

Page 2437 of 3513 ends

Page 2438 of 3513 ends

Pur Water LLC DURRANI INVESTMENTS CORP Univar Solutions USA LLC.

Non-reponsive -prices not provided for all
geographical regions
Non-responsive - provided
quarterly pricing, and required bid
documents not provided \ signed \
notorized
Lowest Responsive
Responsible Bidder of

12.5% in Central Valley,
East Bay, Marin Sonoma
Napa, North Bay,
Peninsula, South Bay, Tri
Valley
y y y
y y y
no y y
n n yes - see below
y y y
none none none
y no - no emergency plan y
y no y
yes no y
y no y
yes - Brenntag, PoolCorp Yes - see below yes - K2 & Univar y no y
yes no y
n/a n/a n/a
3rd party no y
no yes - but nothing attached yes- see below
Univar Olin
4 & 16 4, 6 & 16

Page 2439 of 3513 ends

Page 2440 of 3513 ends

Page 2441 of 3513 ends

Olin Corporation
Lowest
Responsive
Responsible
Bidder of 12.5%
and 5.25% (OBI)
in Sacramento
and
y
y
y
yes - see below
y
yes -see below
y
y
y
y
yes - K2
y
y
n/a
no
y - see below

Page 2442 of 3513 ends

Page 2443 of 3513 ends

Page 2444 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.38
File #: 0103-29
Item ID: 2026-472
Title: Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority – Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Contact: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the $16.6 million Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority (RNGFA) budget for FY2026-27. The RNGFA issued the 2007 Gas Revenue Bonds which financed the prepayment of natural gas used for power generation at the Roseville Energy Park. Approval of the annual budget has no new fiscal impact.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council, acting as the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority, adopt the attached resolution approving the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority FY2026-27 budget.

BACKGROUND
The Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority (RNGFA) budget for FY2026-27 includes a debt service expense budget of $16,546,131, which represents principal and interest payments on the 2007 Gas Revenue Bonds. These bonds financed the prepayment of natural gas used for power generation at the Roseville Energy Park.

FISCAL IMPACT
The budget document provides a financial summary of the revenues and expenses of the RNGFA.

Approval of the annual budget has no new fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The FY2026-27 RNGFA budget meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Teri Quinlan, Accounting Manager
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:

Page 2445 of 3513 ends

1. Resolution 1-26

2. FY27 Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority Budget REVIEWERS:

Teri Quinlan, Finance Department Created/Initiated - 5/27/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 5/28/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2446 of 3513 ends

ROSEVILLE NATURAL GAS FINANCING AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 1-26
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority has reviewed the proposed Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority Budget FY2026-27; NOW, THEREFORE, the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority does hereby resolve that the attached Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority Budget FY2026-27 is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority this __ day of _______, 20___, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES AGENCY MEMBERS:

NOES AGENCY MEMBERS:

ABSENT AGENCY MEMBERS:
__________________________________
CHAIR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Secretary

Page 2447 of 3513 ends

Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority
Actual Budget Budget
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027

OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services 16,528,513 $ 16,821,500 $ 16,830,000 $ Use of Property and Money 534,060 - 40,000
Total Revenues 17,062,573 16,821,500 16,870,000

LESS OPERATING EXPENSES
Roseville Natural Gas Finance Authority 182,068 17,500 17,500 Total Operating Expenses 182,068 17,500 17,500

LESS CAPITAL AND DEBT EXPENSES
Debt Service - Series 2007 Gas Revenue Bonds 16,592,646 16,551,413 16,546,131 Total Capital and Debt Expenses 16,592,646 16,551,413 16,546,131 INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM OPERATIONS 287,859 252,587 306,369 FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR 3,283,396 3,571,255 3,823,842 INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM OPERATIONS 287,859 252,587 306,369 FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR 3,571,255 $ 3,823,842 $ 4,130,211 $

Page 2448 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.39
File #: 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-480
Title: Enterprise Project Management Software - Budget Adjustment Contact: Deanne Baquera 916-774-5157 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $319,106 for internal labor charges for the Enterprise Project Management Software project. Funding is available proportionally from the nine City funds originally approved to fund the project, including the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $319,106 for the Enterprise Project Management Software project.

BACKGROUND
On September 3, 2025, the City Council approved a contract purchase agreement with Metafuse Incorporated dba Project Insight for delivery of a citywide enterprise project management solution.

The original project budget included estimates for City staff labor to support implementation and deployment activities over the course of one year. After approval, citywide discussions regarding the project scope led to valuable input and adjustments. These changes required the project team to adapt staffing levels, deliver additional training, and bring on a limited-term employee once the work resumed. As a result, the project is now set for completion in the second quarter of FY2026-27.

With the project’s later start, City staff dedicated extra time to implementation, retraining, vendor coordination, and refining the project’s scope and design. These additional efforts were not anticipated in the original labor budget. The proposed budget adjustment will ensure that all remaining labor and overhead costs are fully covered, allowing for the successful completion of the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
Estimated labor and vendor costs to complete the project are $319,106 more than available funds. The current project budget is $402,412. With this budget adjustment, the revised project budget will total $721,519.

The project is funded by multiple, so funding is proposed to come proportionally from the following funds:

General Fund - 56.60%; Fleet - 1.80%; Facility Rehabilitation – 1.50%; Electric - 15.20%; Water Rehabilitation – 6.70%; Wastewater Rehabilitation - 9.60%; Solid Waste Rehabilitation - 7.60%; Transit -

Page 2449 of 3513 ends

0.50%; Transportation – 0.50%.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Deanne Baquera, Management Analyst
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7079
REVIEWERS:

Deanne Baquera, Information Technology Department Created/Initiated - 5/26/2026 Zaki Rucker, Information Technology Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Jesse Ravera, Information Technology Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Hong Sae, Information Technology Department Approved - 5/27/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2450 of 3513 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 7079

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Enterprise Project Management project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Page 2451 of 3513 ends

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
1001 5080 84001 500523 180,614 Increase internal labor budget 1001 5670 10001 (180,614) Reduce Contingency Fund budget for project #500523 4005 5080 84001 500523 5,744 Increase internal labor budget 4065 5080 84001 500523 4,787 Increase internal labor budget 6001 5080 84701 500523 48,504 Increase internal labor budget 6130 5080 84001 500523 21,380 Increase internal labor budget 6230 5080 84001 500523 30,634 Increase internal labor budget 6330 5080 84001 500523 24,252 Increase internal labor budget 6511 5080 84001 500523 1,596 Increase internal labor budget 6520 5080 84001 500523 1,596 Increase internal labor budget EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERSOUTTOTAL 138,493

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6511 4425 84001 500523 1,596 Increase revenue budget
6520 4425 84001 500523 1,596 Increase revenue budget
REVENUES/TRANSFERSIN TOTAL 3,192
NET ADJUSTMENT 135,301

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
4005 3601 00000 000000 (5,744) Decrease Fleet Replacement Fund Balance 4065 3601 00000 000000 (4,787) Decrease Facility Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6001 3601 00000 000000 (48,504) Decrease Electric Fund Balance 6130 3601 00000 000000 (21,380) Decrease Water Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6230 3601 00000 000000 (30,634) Decrease Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6330 3601 00000 000000 (24,252) Decrease Waste Services Rehabilitation Fund Balance FUND BALANCE TOTAL (135,301)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Information Technology Department is requesting a budget adjustment to increase the budget for the Enterprise Project Management project (500523) by $319,107 to cover additional labor costs.

The current project budget is $402,412. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $721,519.

The General Fund portion of the requested increase ($180,614) will be funded by General Fund contingency. All other fund increases will be funded by available resources.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 11/19/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

Deanne Baquera, Management Analyst FISCAL YEAR: 2025-26 Deanne Baquera, Management Analyst ORDINANCE:

ITD Information Technology Department

Page 2452 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.40
File #: 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-481
Title: Customer Relationship Management Project - Budget Adjustment Contact: Deanne Baquera 916-774-5157 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $261,374 for internal labor costs for the Customer Relationship Management project. Funding is available in the Information Technology Operations Fund budget.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $261,374 for the Customer Relationship Management project.

BACKGROUND
On September 7, 2022, the City Council approved the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) capital improvement project to modernize and streamline resident service requests, improve internal workflows, and enhance communication between the City and the community. The project also incorporates suggestive AI and online chat features that further enhance customer service, improves response efficiency, and provides residents with more accessible and intuitive ways to engage with the City.

The City entered into an agreement with Granicus, formerly Rock Solid Technology, Inc., to provide CRM software and implementation services. The project scope included system configuration, data migration, integration with existing City systems, and deployment of a unified customer service platform, which went live May 2025.

During the integration phase, Granicus (Rock Solid) faced some delivery challenges that extended the timeline for key project components by approximately one year. In response, the Information Technology Department dedicated more internal labor hours to ensure the project’s continued progress and successful implementation, resulting in higher than anticipated IT labor costs being charged to the project.

This one-time budget adjustment is designed to account for these additional IT labor costs and facilitate the final closeout of the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The one-year delay added $261,374 in extra Information Technology labor costs billed to the project.

Funding is available in the IT Operations Fund to fully fund the project.

Page 2453 of 3513 ends

The budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

6. Deliver exceptional City services

5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Deanne Baquera, Management Analyst
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7080
REVIEWERS:

Deanne Baquera, Information Technology Department Created/Initiated - 5/26/2026 Zaki Rucker, Information Technology Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Jesse Ravera, Information Technology Department Approved - 5/26/2026 Hong Sae, Information Technology Department Approved - 5/27/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/3/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/3/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2454 of 3513 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 7080

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Customer Relationship Management project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Page 2455 of 3513 ends

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 11/19/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: ORDINANCE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
4101 5080 84001 500132 261,374 Increase labor budget to match actuals EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 261,374

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 261,374

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
4101 3601 00000 000000 (261,374) Decrease IT Operations Fund Balance 3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (261,374)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Information Technology Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $261,374 to increase the budget for the Customer Relationship Management project (500132) to cover additional labor costs. Once the adjustment is made, the project will be ready to be closed.

The current project budget is $701,811. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $963,185. Adequate resources are available in the IT Operations Fund.

Deanne Baquera, Management Analyst 2025-26
Deanne Baquera, Management Analyst
ITD Information Technology Department

Page 2456 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.41
File #: 0800-06
Item ID: 2026-421
Title: On-Call Transportation Impact Studies - Professional Services Agreements Contact: Stacie Marchetti 916-774-5278 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of three (3) professional services agreements with (1) DKS Associates, (2) Fehr & Peers, and (3) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for On-Call Transportation Impact Studies. The agreements include an annual not-to-exceed limit of $500,000 per contract. Funding is included in the Development Services Department's Full Cost-Consolidated Billing Project(s) budget and is fully recoverable through project applicant funding. Staff also recommends authorization for the City Manager to execute future amendments to extend the agreements for up to four (4) additional one (1) year renewal terms on behalf of the City. All development projects are required to pay the full cost of traffic impact studies prior to the City authorizing work to begin, resulting in no net fiscal impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt three (3) resolutions to approve Professional Services Agreements with (1) DKS Associates, (2) Fehr & Peers, and (3) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for OnCall Transportation Impact Studies and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff additionally requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute up to four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
New development projects are often required to evaluate impacts to the City’s transportation network during the entitlement and environmental review process, depending on the size and scope of the development project proposed. If a traffic impact study is deemed necessary, staff solicits a scope of work and not-to-exceed cost from the City’s on-call transportation impact consulting firms, which are reviewed and approved by staff, then forwarded to the project applicant for review and approval. Once the scope is approved by all parties, the applicant is required to pay the entire not-to-exceed cost of the study before the study is authorized to begin by the City.

The City’s current on-call transportation impact study agreements expire on June 30, 2026. To ensure business continuity, the City issued a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) for on-call transportation impact studies on February 19, 2026. Seven (7) firms submitted proposals in response to the RFP, and three (3) firms, consisting of (1) DKS Associates, (2) Fehr & Peers, and (3) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., ranked highest based on experience and qualifications, project understanding, service approach, and cost. Consistent with best and past practices, three (3) separate firms will be engaged to reduce potential conflicts of interest that may arise from existing or future contractual relationships with other private

Page 2457 of 3513 ends

entities, including developers and development interests.

If approved, the initial terms of the agreements will commence on July 1, 2026, and expire on June 30, 2027. The agreements authorize the City Manager to extend each agreement in one-year increments for up to an additional four (4) years. All costs associated with on-call transportation impact studies must be agreed upon by all parties and paid in full by the project applicant prior to the City authorizing work to begin.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contracts with DKS Associates, Fehr & Peers, and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall not exceed $500,000 per fiscal year for each agreement. Funding for these professional services is included in the Development Services Department’s Full Cost-Consolidated Billing Project(s) budget. All development projects are required to pay the full cost of traffic impact studies prior to the City authorizing work to begin, resulting in no net fiscal impact on the General Fund.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Stacie Marchetti, Management Analyst
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-200

2. On-Call PSA DKS Associates

3. Resolution 26-201

4. On-Call PSA Fehr Peers

5. Resolution 26-202

6. On-Call PSA Kimley-Horn

7. Intent to Award Notification RFP 06-0010

8. Master Averaged Score Sheet
REVIEWERS:

Cheri McGrath, Development Services Department - Business Services Created/Initiated -

Page 2458 of 3513 ends

Division 5/26/2026
Joe Allen, Development Services Department - Business Services Division Approved - 5/27/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 5/28/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2459 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-200

APPROVING AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND DKS ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, an On-Call Professional Services Agreement for On-Call Transportation Impact Studies, by and between the City of Roseville and DKS Associates, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2460 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx ;04/17/2026]

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
On-Call Transportation Impact Studies
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and DKS Associates, a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY issued Request for Proposal # 06-0010 for professional services consisting of on-call transportation impact studies services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a response to the Request for Proposal dated March 24, 2026, which describes the scope of services to be performed by CONSULTANT, and the hourly rates for performance of such services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide professional transportation impact studies services on an on-call basis.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution and expire on June 30, 2027. The City Manager may, in his or her discretion, elect to extend the Agreement in one (1) year increments for up to an additional four (4) years by giving CONSULTANT thirty (30) days advance written notice of each optional one (1) year renewal. Such extensions shall be memorialized by a written amendment to this Agreement.

Page 2461 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 2 2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of the on-call services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Individual tasks will be awarded by CITY on an as-needed basis. CITY may assign work to one, or more than one consultant from an approved qualified list. CITY reserves the right to unilaterally assign work to any consultant as it deems prudent or, if no services are required, no work. CITY makes no specific guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours or amount of tasks or services, which shall be required of any single consultant. In addition, the inclusion of any consultant on any qualified list, if so utilized by CITY, shall in no way be considered an exclusive agreement to provide service for CITY.

3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the hourly rates as described in EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Any proposed increase in the effective rates for future services must be preceded by at least a 90-day written notice to the contracting department. Total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the initial term. Total compensation for optional renewal years of this Agreement shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). Total compensation for the initial term and all optional renewal years shall not exceed two million, five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000). Adjustment to the total compensation per year shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, subject to approval by the City Council.

CONSULTANT shall submit one monthly invoice for its services. Such invoices shall be delineated by task, the person performing the services, and the hourly rate, which shall be stated in time increments of not greater than one tenth (1/10) hours. CITY shall pay invoices within

Page 2462 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 3 thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

4. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of CONSULTANT's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from CITY's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.

CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

Page 2463 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 4 COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and

Page 2464 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 5 limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under this Agreement. Additionally, CONSULTANT shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of CITY’s indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
f. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full

Page 2465 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 6 certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

6. Records. CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records relating to the services performed hereunder during the term of this Agreement and for a period of not less than one (1) year after the date of termination or expiration. Provided, however, that in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall maintain all files and records until such litigation, appeals or claims are resolved. Duly authorized representatives of CITY shall have right of access during normal business hours and after reasonable notice to CONSULTANT’s and subcontractors’ files and records relating to the services performed hereunder and may review and copy the files and records at appropriate stages during performance of the services and during the one (1) year period following termination or

Page 2466 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 7 expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

7. Prevailing Wages. When applicable, for purposes of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage laws, e.g., but not limited to, California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq. In accordance with said Section 1775, CONSULTANT shall forfeit as a penalty to the City two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any work done on-site under the Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Labor Code Sections 1770 to 1780, inclusive. In addition to said penalty and pursuant to said Section 1775, the difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage shall be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or the applicable subcontractor.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1773, the contracting department has identified the source, stated below, of the general prevailing rate of wages applicable to the site to be done, for straight time, overtime, and holiday work. The holiday wage rate listed shall be applicable to all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement of the particular craft, classification or type of worker concerned. These wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at

Page 2467 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 8 the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

8. Contractor Registration. No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. CONSULTANT is hereby notified that this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

9. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

10. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

11. Public Contracts: Conflicts of Interest. CONSULTANT’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of the CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all

Page 2468 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 9 conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

13. Governing Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and its EXHIBITS, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. In the event of any conflict between any of the EXHIBITS, the provisions of the first in order of attachment shall govern.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

15. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT, inclusive of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and subcontractors, shall act as an independent contractor, and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status, that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or

Page 2469 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 10 similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

16. Representations and Warranties. CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate as void this Agreement, without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

18. Copyright, Ownership and Use of Materials. All tangible material (“Material”) created or delivered pursuant to this Agreement is considered a work made for hire under the Copyright Act. To the extent such Material does not qualify as a work made for hire, CONSULTANT hereby assigns to CITY all right, title, and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, in all Material created by CONSULTANT in its performance under this

Page 2470 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 11 Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

In the event that CONSULTANT uses, employs, designates, or retains any person or entity who is not an employee of CONSULTANT, to perform any work required of it pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall require said person or entity to execute an agreement containing the preceding paragraph.

19. Termination of Agreement. CITY may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CITY thirty (30) days advance written notice. CONSULTANT understands that continuation of this Agreement past June 30th of any given year is contingent upon appropriation of funds for such purpose in the budget of the City of Roseville in the sole discretion of the City Council. In the event of termination through no fault of CONSULTANT, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for services performed as of the date of termination, upon the release to CITY of all Material hereunder, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. CITY retains the right to receive and use any MATERIAL, notwithstanding any termination or any dispute regarding the amount to be paid.

Page 2471 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 12 20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

22. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Development Services Department DKS Associates
Attn: Mike Isom Attn: John Bosket
311 Vernon Street 428 J Street, Suite 340
Roseville, CA 95678 Sacramento, CA 95814
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

Page 2472 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a
municipal corporation
BY:_______________________________

DOMINICK CASEY
City Manager
ATTEST:

DKS ASSOCIATES, a California
corporation
BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
and
BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY:_______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

MIKE ISOM
Development Services Director
Senior Vice President
Corporate Secretary

Page 2473 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] EXHIBIT “A”

Page 2474 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES 17 UNDERSTANDING THE CITY’S NEEDS
DKS has supported the City of Roseville for more than
25 years, providing transportation impact analysis, travel demand modeling, operations analysis, corridor studies, ITS implementation, and public outreach. Through this
experience, we understand the City’s expectations for
timely, objective, and cost-e
ective transportation studies
that support development while protecting the City’s
transportation system and community character.

The City relies on its on-call consultants to serve as an extension of sta
—providing technically sound, defensible
analyses; maintaining consistency with City standards and guidelines; and supporting a collaborative, solution-oriented development review process. We understand the importance of balancing thorough analysis with e
cient project delivery
to avoid unnecessary delays or costs.

APPROACH TO MEETING THE
CITY’S NEEDS
We will work closely with City sta
at the outset of each
task order to define the appropriate study type (short-term or long-term), confirm assumptions, and establish a clear scope, schedule, and budget. Our familiarity with the City’s procedures allows us to initiate work quickly and avoid unnecessary iteration.

KEY TECHNICAL STRENGTHS
DKS brings extensive expertise in all aspects of
transportation impact studies, including:

Travel demand forecasting: Deep experience with
SACOG’s SACSIM model and regional modeling tools,
enabling e
cient and accurate project forecasting.

Tra
c operations and simulation: Advanced use
of microsimulation and analytical tools to evaluate
complex roadway and intersection operations.

Signal timing and operations analysis: Nationally
recognized expertise in level of service analysis and
signal system optimization.

CEQA and SB 743 compliance: Preparation
of defensible VMT analyses and environmental
documentation consistent with current guidance and
case law.

Multimodal planning and design: Integration of
bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and complete streets
considerations into all analyses.

Data collection and GIS analysis: Use of advanced
data collection methods and spatial analysis to
support accurate and e
cient studies.

MAJOR CHALLENGES AND SPECIAL

CONSIDERATIONS
Based on our experience with the City and similar projects, key challenges include:

Balancing development review timelines with
analytical rigor, particularly for complex or phased
projects
Applying SB 743 VMT requirements consistently
across project types while aligning with City thresholds and policies
Maintaining consistency between travel demand
model outputs and localized operational analyses
Coordinating assumptions across multiple
stakeholders, including City sta
, applicants, and
regional agencies
Avoiding rework due to changing project
assumptions, which can a
ect schedule and cost
DKS addresses these challenges through early coordination, clear documentation of assumptions, and ongoing
communication with City sta
throughout each study.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
TAB D 

Page 2475 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES 18

UNIQUE STRENGTHS
DKS o
ers several unique advantages for this on-call
contract:

Long-standing relationship with the City, allowing
immediate productivity without a learning curve.

Public-sector-only practice in the Sacramento
region, eliminating potential conflicts of interest and reinforcing objectivity.

Direct involvement in development of regional
travel demand models, including SACSIM.

Strong communication and visualization
capabilities, enabling clear presentation of complex
technical information to decision-makers and the
public.

Proven ability to deliver defensible, practical, and
cost-e
ective studies that support both City goals
and successful project outcomes.

Page 2476 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES 19

PROJECT EXECUTION

WOC REQUEST

PROJECT INITIATION

DEFINE THE

PROJECT
ASSIGN
TEAM

MEMBERS
SCOPE,

SCHEDULE,
BUDGET

PLANNING EXECUTION

PROJECT CLOSURE

PROJECT

CLOSURE

CUSTOMER SERVICE

MONITORING

LESSONS

LEARNED

IMPROVED

PRACTICES

NOTICE TO PROCEED
  CLIENT COMMUNICATION  

APPROACH TO SERVICES
DKS understands the City of Roseville’s expectations for timely, high-quality on-call transportation impact studies.

With over 20 years of experience supporting the City, we are familiar with applicable procedures, standards, and guidelines, allowing us to initiate work e
ciently without a
learning curve. We work closely with City sta
to define a
clear, cost-e
ective scope, schedule, and budget tailored to
each project. This approach will be applied, as appropriate, to both short-term and long-term tra
c studies.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING
DKS is organized to provide responsive, high-quality
support for each task order. Josh Pilachowski will lead overall coordination as On-Call Manager and serve as the City’s primary point of contact. Jim Damkowitch, serving as Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Manager, will provide senior oversight to help ensure that all work products are thorough, consistent, and aligned with quality expectations. Ben
Stabler will provide senior advisory support.

Project assignments will be matched to the specific
technical needs of each e
ort. Key sta
roles include David
Tokarski for travel demand modeling, Josh Pilachowski for engineering and safety studies, and Udit Molakatalla for CEQA/VMT analysis. Additional support will be provided by sta
such as John Gibb and Sean Carney, whose technical
expertise will supplement the core team as needed.

All work will be completed by DKS personnel, and no
subconsultants are anticipated.

METHODOLOGY
DKS tailors each study to project-specific conditions in coordination with City sta
. Key elements of our approach
include:
• Determining if cumulative analysis is needed
• Confirming study area limits, study intersections/
segments, and analysis assumptions
• Evaluating the need for travel demand modeling versus other forecasting methods
• Assessing site access, circulation, and local roadway operations
• Applying appropriate level of service and queuing
methodologies
• Conducting CEQA VMT analysis consistent with SB 743,
including identification of mitigation strategies where applicable
We use industry-standard tools including travel demand
models, microsimulation, Synchro/SimTra
c, and MMLOS
methodologies to evaluate safety, operations, VMT, and
multimodal performance.

PROJECT PLAN
TAB E 
“Project Manager [Josh Pilachowski] is committed to
this project; he oers direction and advice before I can even think to ask for it! ... I’m confident this project will continue to be a success through the very end.”
- Sarah Poe, Senior Planner, SacRT Safe Routes to Transit

Page 2477 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES 20

TYPICAL WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE
DKS will develop a project-specific work plan for each task order. A typical schedule for a TIA includes:
• Draft scope, schedule, and budget: within two to
three weeks of request
• Kicko
meeting: within one week of notice to proceed
• Data review and assumptions memorandum: within
two to four weeks of receiving project information
• Trip Generation/Distribution memorandum: within
three to four weeks of receiving project information
• Draft forecasts and analysis results: within six to
twelve weeks of agreement on assumptions
• Administrative draft report: within eight to fourteen weeks of agreement on assumptions, unless project
complexity requires a longer analysis period
• Final report: within two weeks of receiving City
comments
Small projects, such as single-parcel developments with limited complexity, would generally fall at the shorter end of these schedule ranges. Larger projects, such as multideveloper studies, uncommon land use types, or projects with complex access requirements, would typically fall
toward the upper end. The specific schedule for each task order will be discussed during the initial scoping phase.

EQUIPMENT AND RESOURCES
DKS maintains all necessary equipment and software to
complete tra
c studies, including travel demand modeling
platforms, tra
c operations software, and data analysis
tools. Sta
are trained in current methodologies, including
SB 743 VMT analysis. No special installation services are required.

QUALITY CONTROL AND

COMMUNICATION
DKS employs a structured project management approach to ensure on-time and within-budget delivery, including:
• Weekly internal coordination meetings
• Ongoing budget and schedule tracking
• Bi-weekly communication with City sta

• Senior-level QA/QC review for all deliverables
Our approach, illustrated below, ensures transparency,
minimizes rework, and maintains alignment with City
expectations.

Deliverable
Development
1 Self-check that baseline standards and methodology
were followed
Originator
A (Initiator)
Initial QC
Review
2 Review closely that baseline standards and methodology were followed, and that deliverable contents make sense B
Reviewer
QC Comment
Incorporation
3 Accept/incorporate direct comments
Perform additional work with team support/discussions
to resolve comments
Originator
A (Initiator)
Final QC
Review
4 Confirm that all comments are incorporated with a QC stamp and signatures on the document or a completed QC review form Review the Final Deliverable
QC
Verifier
C (Backchecker)

QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) PROCESS
QA
Review
1 Confirms that the QC process has been followed for all project deliverables, as outlined in the QMP
QMP
Project Quality
D Manager

QUALITY CONTROL (QC) PROCESS

Page 2478 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA DKS Associates.docx; 04/17/2026] EXHIBIT “B”

Page 2479 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES 24

COST PROPOSAL
TAB F 
DKS will invoice monthly for work completed on a time-and-materials basis, with not-to-exceed amounts and scopes established for each authorized task order. Hourly billing rates for DKS team members are based on the attached 2026 Fee Schedule. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost and may include transportation, subsistence, delivery/postage, reproduction/printing, and other direct project expenses. Billing rates are subject to annual escalation.

Billing rates and roles of key sta
are provided below. A summary of DKS’s hourly rates by sta classification are provided on
the next page:

Page 2480 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES 25 Grade 9 95.00
Grade 10 100.00
Grade 11 105.00
Grade 12 110.00
Grade 13 115.00
Grade 14 120.00
Grade 15 125.00
Grade 16 130.00
Grade 17 135.00
Grade 18 140.00
Grade 19 145.00
Grade 20 150.00
Grade 21 155.00
Grade 22 160.00
Grade 23 165.00
Grade 24 170.00
Grade 25 175.00
Grade 26 180.00
Grade 27 185.00
Grade 28 190.00
Grade 29 195.00
Grade 30 200.00
Grade 31 205.00
Grade 32 210.00
Grade 33 215.00
Grade 34 220.00
Grade 35 225.00
Grade 36 230.00
Grade 37 235.00
Grade 38 240.00
Grade 39 245.00
Grade 40 250.00
Grade 41 255.00
Tech Level AP 240.00
Tech Level AH 200.00
Tech Level AI 205.00
Tech Level AJ 210.00
Tech Level AN 230.00
Tech Level AO 235.00
140.00
Tech Level W 145.00
Tech Level X 150.00
Tech Level Y 155.00
Senior Creative Services
Tech Level Z 160.00
Tech Level AA 165.00
Tech Level AB 170.00
Tech Level AC 175.00
Tech Level AD 180.00
Tech Level AE 185.00
Tech Level AF 190.00
Tech Level AG 195.00
Tech Level Hourly Rate Classification
Tech Level M 95.00
Administrative SupportJunior Creative Services
Tech Level N 100.00
Tech Level O 105.00
Tech Level P 110.00
Tech Level Q 115.00
Tech Level R 120.00
Tech Level S 125.00
Tech Level T 130.00
Tech Level U 135.00
Tech Level V
Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026
TECHNICIANS and SUPPORT STAFF Transportation Planner/Engineer Grade 57 335.00
Grade 58 340.00
Grade 59 345.00
Grade 60 350.00
Grade 61 355.00
Grade 62 360.00
Grade 63 365.00
Planner/EngineerSenior
Grade 70 400.00
Grade 64 370.00
Grade 65 375.00
Grade 66 380.00
Grade 67 385.00
Grade 68
Grade 49 295.00
Grade 50 300.00
Grade 51 305.00
Grade 52 310.00
Associate Planner/Engineer
Grade 53 315.00
Grade 54 320.00
Grade 55 325.00
Grade 56 330.00
390.00
Grade 69 395.00
Senior Project Manager
Principal Senior Planner/Engineer
Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026
ENGINEERS and PLANNERS
Grade Hourly Rate Classification Grade Hourly Rate Classification Assistant Planner/Engineer Grade 42 260.00
Grade 43 265.00
Grade 44 270.00
Grade 45 275.00
Grade 46 280.00
Grade 47 285.00
Grade 48 290.00

Page 2481 of 3513 ends

TRANSACTION DETAILS DOCUMENT DETAILS
Reference Number
C35F7B6D-B35A-4D9A-901C-3E27B3C83E1C
Transaction Type
Signature Request
Sent At
05/11/2026 12:57:29 PM EDT
Executed At
05/11/2026 01:32:05 PM EDT
Identity Method
email
Distribution Method
email
Signed Checksum
79da4694b7db3541d77b027e526a837b7594d8004283f847d2673087b5dc0151 Signer Sequencing
Disabled
Document Passcode
Disabled
eIDAS Authentication
Disabled
Document Name
On-Call PSA DKS Associates
Filename
On-Call_PSA_DKS_Associates.pdf
Pages
21 pages
Content Type
application/pdf
File Size

2.57 MB
Original Checksum
fc53c0c495cbb149660e57a63f3b0a1042975f170fb46d8d853dee64934c61df

SIGNERS

SIGNER E-SIGNATURE EVENTS
Name
Brian Chandler
Email
[email protected]
Components
1 Status
signed
Multi-factor Digital Fingerprint Checksum
4f53cda18c2baa0c0354bb5f9a3ecbe5ed12ab4d8e11ba873c2f11161202b945 IP Address
107.192.51.200
Device
Chrome via Windows
Typed Signature
Signature Reference ID
F0207A3F
Viewed At
05/11/2026 01:30:19 PM EDT
Identity Authenticated At
05/11/2026 01:32:05 PM EDT
Signed At
05/11/2026 01:32:05 PM EDT
Name
Richard Hutchinson
Email
[email protected]
Components
1 Status
signed
Multi-factor Digital Fingerprint Checksum
4f53cda18c2baa0c0354bb5f9a3ecbe5ed12ab4d8e11ba873c2f11161202b945 IP Address
172.56.104.93
Device
Mobile Safari via iOS
Typed Signature
Signature Reference ID
8CCFC4CF
Viewed At
05/11/2026 01:01:04 PM EDT
Identity Authenticated At
05/11/2026 01:01:20 PM EDT
Signed At
05/11/2026 01:01:20 PM EDT
AUDITS

TIMESTAMP AUDIT
05/11/2026 12:57:29 PM EDT Briana Amaya ([email protected]) created document 'On-Call_PSA_DKS_Associates.pdf' on Chrome via Windows from 69.216.98.232.
05/11/2026 12:57:29 PM EDT Brian Chandler ([email protected]) was emailed a link to sign. 05/11/2026 12:57:30 PM EDT Richard Hutchinson ([email protected]) was emailed a link to sign. 05/11/2026 01:01:04 PM EDT Richard Hutchinson ([email protected]) viewed the document on Mobile Safari via iOS from 172.56.104.93.

SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE

REFERENCE NUMBER
C35F7B6D-B35A-4D9A-901C-3E27B3C83E1C

Page 2482 of 3513 ends

05/11/2026 01:01:20 PM EDT Richard Hutchinson ([email protected]) authenticated via email on Mobile Safari via iOS from 172.56.104.93. 05/11/2026 01:01:20 PM EDT Richard Hutchinson ([email protected]) signed the document on Mobile Safari via iOS from 172.56.104.93. 05/11/2026 01:30:19 PM EDT Brian Chandler ([email protected]) viewed the document on Chrome via Windows from 107.192.51.200.
05/11/2026 01:32:05 PM EDT Brian Chandler ([email protected]) authenticated via email on Chrome via Windows from 107.192.51.200.
05/11/2026 01:32:05 PM EDT Brian Chandler ([email protected]) signed the document on Chrome via Windows from 107.192.51.200.

TIMESTAMP AUDIT

Page 2483 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-201

APPROVING AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FEHR & PEERS, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, an On-Call Professional Services Agreement for On-Call Transportation Impact Studies, by and between the City of Roseville and Fehr & Peers, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2484 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx ;04/17/2026]

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
On-Call Transportation Impact Studies
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Fehr & Peers, a California corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

Page 2485 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 2 2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of the on-call services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Individual tasks will be awarded by CITY on an as-needed basis. CITY may assign work to one, or more than one consultant from an approved qualified list. CITY reserves the right to unilaterally assign work to any consultant as it deems prudent or, if no services are required, no work. CITY makes no specific guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours or amount of tasks or services, which shall be required of any single consultant. In addition, the inclusion of any consultant on any qualified list, if so utilized by CITY, shall in no way be considered an exclusive agreement to provide service for CITY.

Page 2486 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 3 thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

Page 2487 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 4 COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and

Page 2488 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 5 limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full

Page 2489 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 6 certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

Page 2490 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 7 expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at

Page 2491 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 8 the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

9. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

10. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all

Page 2492 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 9 conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

Page 2493 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 10 similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

Page 2494 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 11 Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

19. Termination of Agreement. CITY may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

Page 2495 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 12 20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Development Services Department Fehr & Peers
Attn: Mike Isom Attn: John Gard
311 Vernon Street 1013 Galleria Boulevard, Suite 255
Roseville, CA 95678 Roseville, CA 95678
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

Page 2496 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a FEHR & PEERS, a California corporation municipal corporation
BY:_______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY:_______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

MIKE ISOM
Development Services Director

Page 2497 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] EXHIBIT “A”

Page 2498 of 3513 ends

City of Roseville On-Call Transportation Impact Studies | 10 creativity, and responsiveness in conducting traffic
studies within the City of Roseville. This has ranged
from simple access studies (e.g., Pleasant Grove
Boulevard Coffee Store), to complex access
studies (e.g., Foothills Station), to highly
controversial projects such as Villasport and
completed work for entire Specific Plans (e.g.,
Amoruso) and Major Project Permits (e.g., Campus
Oaks).

We are intimately familiar with City of Roseville
design standards and approaches to analyzing the
traffic impacts of proposed land developments.

We understand when short-term versus
long-term studies are needed.

We are well-versed in City design
standards related to driveway spacing and
permitted turning movements.

We have intimate knowledge of the City’s
travel demand model and use it often to
support these studies.

Project Access Reviews
Analysis of project access focuses on a variety of
traffic engineering and planning concepts including
(but not limited to):

Driveway design (placement, permitted
movement, widths, curb return radii, throat
depth)
Need for deceleration lanes
Median treatments including turn lane
storage
Sight distance considerations
Traffic signal phasing changes and effects
of new signals on signalized corridors
Spacing of new traffic signals
Adequacy of design to accommodate
anticipated truck traffic
Accommodation of bicyclists and
pedestrians
On-Site Circulation Reviews
The review of on-site circulation is also important.

This includes review of parking lot layouts, drivethrough storage capacity, dead-end drive aisles, pedestrian connections to adjacent streets, etc. -
site circulation recommendation in an illustrative
format that can be used in public hearings and to
develop conditions of approval for a project.

Unique Approaches and
Strengths
Through extensive work experience in the city, we
can anticipate potential issues of concern to city
staff, elected officials, and the general public. We
therefore tailor our approaches to those conditions.

Many of the studies performed under this on-call
are third party agreements involving a project
applicant who funds the study through the city. We
are also keenly aware that both time and cost are
important factors. In response to this, we routinely
manage more complex studies in the following
proactive way:

If a serious site access design issue is
identified, we stop work on the study and
advise city staff (who then share this with
the applicant team).

The ongoing Fiddyment/Pleasant Grove Retail
Center study is an excellent example of this
proactive approach.

As a firm, we offer numerous tools to address built
environment issues such as: crosswalk placement,
bicyclist/pedestrian comfort, shared parking among
complementary land uses, and curbspace
requirements for pick-up/drop-off. We have built
or have access to customized tools for these and
other topics.

Page 2499 of 3513 ends

City of Roseville On-Call Transportation Impact Studies | 11 Analysis Methodologies
Our extensive work history in Roseville has
provided us with a strong understanding of the
analysis methodologies preferred by City staff. Our
analytical approaches are well-aligned with City
staff when scoping studies. Following lists some
simple examples of how our analysis methods are
targeted to the particular type of study:

Busy travel corridors – typically analyzed
using microsimulation models so that signal
coordination benefits and effects of vehicle
queue spillback are considered.

Roundabouts – typically analyzed using
Sidra, but can also be analyzed using
VISSIM when a complex multi-lane
roundabout is proposed (e.g., Washington
Boulevard/Oak Street)
Trip Generation – we often use our
proprietary Mixed-use Trip Generation
Model (MXD) to estimate internalization of
trips generated by complementary land
uses. We did recently for the Roseville
Commons TIS.

VMT Analysis – For significant VMT
impacts (under CEQA), we rely on stateof-the-practice transportation demand management (TDM) strategies to quantify
their effectiveness at reducing VMT to less
than significant levels.

Work Schedule
The complexity of the project and type of study will
dictate the schedule. Following are typical
scheduled:

For smaller, site-access studies, we can
typically perform the study in as little as
four weeks from authorization.

For larger, more complex studies, up to
eight weeks may be required
Assigned Staff
considerable prior work experience in the City of
Roseville. We will staff this on-call assignment
almost exclusively from our Roseville and
Sacramento offices. On occasion, we may call upon
experts from outside our region to provide
specialized expertise. We do not propose including
any subconsultants on our team.

Necessary Equipment/Training
We do not require any special equipment or
training to perform these studies. We have an
excellent understanding of City design standards
from years of work in the City. We know the City’s
travel demand model very well, being in the midst
of updating it and using it on projects for decades.

We know which City staff to contact to request a
range of data such as: engineering speed surveys,
as-built drawings, etc.

Public Hearings
hearings while serving as a consultant on behalf of
the City. We work cooperatively with Development
Services staff on a range of traffic and land use
issues. We understand that our role may differ at
Planning Commission and City Council hearings
based on the type of project. In some instances, we
will be present in the event questions should arise.

In other instances, we may need to deliver a
presentation on a complex transportation issue or
to support City staff that are making this
presentation.

Page 2500 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\On-Call PSA Fehr & Peers.docx; 04/17/2026] EXHIBIT “B”

Page 2501 of 3513 ends

City of Roseville On-Call Transportation Impact Studies | 12 For this on- -andmaterials basis with a not-to-exceed limit defined by the work assignment.

Below is our current hourly billing rate schedule by classification, which is valid through June 2026. Billing rate ranges change annually in response to overall market and economic conditions. Also shown below are reimbursable expenses requested to be paid by the City.

Current hourly billing rates for key staff mentioned in this submittal are shown below:

John Gard: $410 / hour
Rob Hananouchi: $265 / hour
David Manciati: $230 / hour
(July 2025 through June 2026)
Hourly Billing Rates
Classification Hourly Rate
Principal $280.00 - $500.00
Senior Associate $210.00 - $410.00
Associate $185.00 - $360.00
Senior Engineer/Planner $160.00 - $295.00
Engineer/Planner $130.00 - $240.00
Senior Engineering Technician $150.00 - $300.00
Senior Project Accountant $185.00 - $245.00
Senior Project Coordinator $125.00 - $235.00
Project Coordinator $125.00 - $225.00
Technician $145.00 - $240.00
Intern $100.00 - $160.00
Other Direct Costs / Reimbursable expenses are invoiced at cost plus 10% for handling.

Personal auto mileage is reimbursed at the then current IRS approved rate (70 cents per mile as of Jan 2025).

Technology and Security Fee (software licensing, hardware upgrades, secure data storage, etc.) are invoiced and calculated as a percentage of monthly project labor.

Fehr & Peers reserves the right to change these rates at any time with or without advance notice.

Page 2502 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-202

APPROVING AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF

OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an On-Call Professional Services Agreement for On-Call Transportation Impact Studies, by and between the City of Roseville and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2503 of 3513 ends

Page 2504 of 3513 ends

Page 2505 of 3513 ends

Page 2506 of 3513 ends

Page 2507 of 3513 ends

Page 2508 of 3513 ends

Page 2509 of 3513 ends

Page 2510 of 3513 ends

Page 2511 of 3513 ends

Page 2512 of 3513 ends

Page 2513 of 3513 ends

Page 2514 of 3513 ends

Page 2515 of 3513 ends

311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD
To:

From:

Subject:

All On-Call Transportation Impact Studies proposers concerning RFP #06-0010 On-Call Transportation Impact Studies
Development Services, Matthew Todd, Principal Engineer
Notice of Intent to Award
For RFP #06-0010, pending City Council approval, the City recommends awarding a contract to the following three consultants:

DKS Associates
Fehr & Peers
Kimley-Horn
To inquire about the recommended award, please write to Development Services, Matthew Todd, Principal Engineer at [email protected].

Page 2516 of 3513 ends

On-Call Transportation Impact Studies
RFP Released by City 2/23/2026
Deadline for Final Questions 2/27/2026
City Responses to Questions 3/6/2026
Proposal Submission Deadline 3/24/2026
Consultant Interviews 3/25/26 - 3/31/2026
Contract Negotiations April
Contract Approval by City Council May
Commencement of Services 7/1/2026

Page 2517 of 3513 ends

Department: Development Services
Date: Interviews No Conducted
RFP No. 06-0010
for
On-Call Transportation Impact Studies
Ranking Company Name
1 Fehr & Peers
2 Kimley-Horn
3 DKS
4 Iteris
5 Dudek
6 W-Trans
7 LLG
The above ranking shows the vendor placement in terms of first place, second place, third place, etc. for selection of the contract award. Proposers are ranked using the following criteria: a) Quality of presentation b) Ability to meet the City's business goals c) Communication style Instructions to end users: Delete this section before publishing the score sheet.

Ranking Process. Should the City elect to conduct interviews with any proposers, the following criteria shall be considered and each proposer ranked by the evaluation panel during the interview process: a) Quality of presentation b) Ability to meet the City's business goals c) Communication style. Enter a "1" in the Ranking column beside the first place company, a "2" beside the second place company, etc.

Novus. Publish the completed score sheet in Novus as a "non-public" document.

Ranking Sheet. Upon a request pursuant to section 1.8 (Public Disclosure) of the City's RFP Policy document , a proposer is entitled to a ranking from any interview round. The ranking shall be prepared by City staff prior to notifying any proposers of the results.

Section 1.8 Public Disclosure. In accordance with the California Public Records Act, proposals submitted in response to a RFP, master averaged score sheets from the initial evaluation, and/or rankings from any interview shall be made available upon a public records request only after: (1) the proposal evaluation process is complete, (2) a contract has been negotiated, and (3) notice of intent to award has been made and/or the contract is placed on a City Council meeting agenda.

Page 2518 of 3513 ends

Department: Development Services
Date: 3/24/26
RFP No. 06-0010
for
On-Call Transportation Impact Studies
Submittal Company
Experience and Qualifications of
firm and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors Understanding of the
service - proposed
service plan
1 DKS 81 70
2 Dudek 70 55
3 Fehr & Peers 88 70
4 Iteris 67 60
5 Kimley-Horn 84 70
6 W-Trans 67 57
7 LLG 65 48
Instructions to end users: Delete this section before publishing the score sheet.

Novus. Publish the completed score sheet in Novus as a "non-public" document.

Evaluation Score Sheets. Upon a request pursuant to section 1.8 (Public Disclosure) of the City's RFP Policy docume the proposers during the evaluation panel’s initial evaluation and the ranking of proposers from any interview (indi evaluation panel). The master score sheet and ranking shall be prepared by City staff prior to notifying any propose Section 1.8 Public Disclosure. In accordance with the California Public Records Act, proposals submitted in respons shall be made available upon a public records request only after: (1) the proposal evaluation process is complete, (2 placed on a City Council meeting agenda.

Page 2519 of 3513 ends

Proposed Project Plan Proposed cost Total
64 58 273
61 55 241
69 54 281
59 61 247
71 52 277
58 51 233
61 58 232
of the City's RFP Policy document , a proposer is entitled to a master averaged score sheet that reflects the averaged evaluatio posers from any interview (individual score sheets and/or notes are temporary and are not retained following a determination f prior to notifying any proposers of the results.
proposals submitted in response to a RFP, master averaged score sheets from the initial evaluation, and/or rankings from any aluation process is complete, (2) a contract has been negotiated, and (3) notice of intent to award has been made and/or the c

Page 2520 of 3513 ends

eflects the averaged evaluation scores of
ned following a determination of the
on, and/or rankings from any interview
d has been made and/or the contract is

Page 2521 of 3513 ends

1 Company Criteria
Possible
Points Mark Matt
DKS
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 30 27 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 25 23
Proposed Project Plan 25 23 20
Proposed cost 20 18 20
Total: 100 96 90
2 2 Company Criteria
Possible
Points Mark Matt
Dudek
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 22 25 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 17 18
Proposed Project Plan 25 20 23
Proposed cost 20 17 19
Total: 100 76 85
3 Company Criteria
Possible
Points Mark Matt
Fehr & Peers
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 30 30 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 25 21
Proposed Project Plan 25 24 21
Proposed cost 20 18 17
Total: 100 97 89
4 Company Criteria
Possible
Points Mark Matt
Iteris
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 21 23 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 20 20
Proposed Project Plan 25 19 20
Proposed cost 20 20 23
Total: 100 80 86

Page 2522 of 3513 ends

5 Company Criteria Mark Matt
Kimley-Horn
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 30 28 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 25 23
Proposed Project Plan 25 25 23
Proposed cost 20 15 18
Total: 100 95 92
6 Company Criteria Mark Matt
W-Trans
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 22 25 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 17 20
Proposed Project Plan 25 20 20
Proposed cost 20 16 19
Total: 100 75 84
7 Company Criteria Mark Matt
LLG
Experience and Qualifications of firm
and proposed staff/subconsultants/sub-contractors 30 20 23 Understanding of the service -
proposed service plan 25 18 10
Proposed Project Plan 25 20 23
Proposed cost 20 19 21
Total: 100 77 77

Page 2523 of 3513 ends

Jack Total
24 81
22 70
21 64
20 58
87 273
Jack Total
23 70
20 55
18 61
19 55
80 241
Jack Total
28 88
24 70
24 69
19 54
95 281
Jack Total
23 67
20 60
20 59
18 61
81 247

Page 2524 of 3513 ends

Jack Total
26 84
22 70
23 71
19 52
90 277
Jack Total
20 67
20 57
18 58
16 51
74 233
Jack Total
22 65
20 48
18 61
18 58
78 232

Page 2525 of 3513 ends

The above ranking shows the vendor placement in terms of first place, second place, third place, etc. for selection o criteria: a) Quality of presentation b) Ability to meet the City's business goals c) Communication style 1 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
DKS Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25
Total: 100 0 0
2 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
Dudek Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25
Total: 100 0 0
3 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
Fehr & Peers Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25
Total: 100 0 0
4 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
Iteris Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25
Total: 100 0 0
5 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
Kimley-Horn Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25

Page 2526 of 3513 ends

Total: 100 0 0
6 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
W-Trans Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25
Total: 100 0 0
7 Company Criteria
Possible
Points
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
LLG Quality of Presentation 25
Ability to meet the City's business
goals 50
Communication Style 25
Total: 100 0 0

Page 2527 of 3513 ends

(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 rd place, etc. for selection of the contract award. Proposers are ranked using the following munication style

Page 2528 of 3513 ends

0 0 0 0 0
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name)
(Staff
Name) Total
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 2529 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.42
File #: 0400-04-12-1 &
0400-07
Item ID: 2026-495
Title: Sierra Vista Village JM-01 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Ed Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Sierra Vista Village JM-01 Subdivision Agreement with John Mourier Construction, Inc., and the final map. Review of the final map has been completed, and it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 134 residential lots, a private street (Lot A), and one (1) remainder parcel. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept on behalf of the public right of way and public easements offered thereon; and

2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 134 residential lots, 1 private street (Lot A), and 1 remainder lot.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the Sierra Vista Village JM-01 residential subdivision was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (certified May 5, 2020, SCH# 2008032115) and identified in the associated Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Construction of the Sierra Vista Village JM-01 residential subdivision is found to be within the scope of the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and is therefore exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15182. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analyses of community infrastructure and facilities, including residential subdivisions.

Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects

Page 2530 of 3513 ends

would be expected to occur, and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the Sierra Vista Village JM-01 residential subdivision. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, no additional CEQA review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Winston, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Final Map

3. Resolution 26-197

4. Subdivision Agreement
REVIEWERS:

Ed Winston, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Created/Initiated - 5/27/2026 Marc Stout, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Approved - 5/28/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 5/28/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/1/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/1/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/1/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2531 of 3513 ends

Page 2532 of 3513 ends

Page 2533 of 3513 ends

Page 2534 of 3513 ends

Page 2535 of 3513 ends

Page 2536 of 3513 ends

Page 2537 of 3513 ends

Page 2538 of 3513 ends

Page 2539 of 3513 ends

Page 2540 of 3513 ends

Page 2541 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-197

APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a Subdivision Agreement for the Sierra Vista Village JM-01 Subdivision, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Subdivision Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2542 of 3513 ends

Page 2543 of 3513 ends

Page 2544 of 3513 ends

Page 2545 of 3513 ends

Page 2546 of 3513 ends

Page 2547 of 3513 ends

Page 2548 of 3513 ends

Page 2549 of 3513 ends

Page 2550 of 3513 ends

Page 2551 of 3513 ends

Page 2552 of 3513 ends

Page 2553 of 3513 ends

Page 2554 of 3513 ends

Page 2555 of 3513 ends

Page 2556 of 3513 ends

Page 2557 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.43
File #: 0400-04-12-1 &
0400-07
Item ID: 2026-497
Title: Sierra Vista Village FD-07 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Jeff Hendrix 916-774-5463 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approving the Sierra Vista Village FD-07 Subdivision Agreement with John Mourier Construction, Inc., and the final map. Review of the final map has been completed, and it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 58 residential lots, a private street (Lot A), one (1) public landscape lot (Lot B), and two (2) public drainage lots (Lots C and D). The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept on behalf of the public the public easements offered thereon, and accept subject to improvement, Lots B, C, and D and the rights of way offered thereon.

2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 58 residential lots, 1 private street (Lot A), 1 public landscape lot, and 2 public drainage lots.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the Sierra Vista Village FD-07 residential subdivision was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (certified May 5, 2020, SCH# 2008032115) and identified in the associated Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Construction of the Sierra Vista Village FD-07 residential subdivision is found to be within the scope of the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and is therefore exempt

Page 2558 of 3513 ends

from CEQA pursuant to Section 15182. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analyses of community infrastructure and facilities, including residential subdivisions.

Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur, and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the Sierra Vista Village FD-07 residential subdivision. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, no additional CEQA review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Hendrix, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 26-232

3. Subdivision Agreement
REVIEWERS:

Jeff Hendrix, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Created/Initiated - 5/27/2026 Marc Stout, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Approved - 5/28/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 5/28/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/3/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/5/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2026

Page 2559 of 3513 ends

Page 2560 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-232

APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a Subdivision Agreement for the Sierra Vista Village FD-07 Subdivision, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2561 of 3513 ends

Page 2562 of 3513 ends

Page 2563 of 3513 ends

Page 2564 of 3513 ends

Page 2565 of 3513 ends

Page 2566 of 3513 ends

Page 2567 of 3513 ends

Page 2568 of 3513 ends

Page 2569 of 3513 ends

Page 2570 of 3513 ends

Page 2571 of 3513 ends

Page 2572 of 3513 ends

Page 2573 of 3513 ends

Page 2574 of 3513 ends

Page 2575 of 3513 ends

Page 2576 of 3513 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/17/2026
Item #: VII.44
File #: 0800-06
Item ID: 2026-482
Title: On-Call Building Plan Review and Inspection Services - On-Call Professional Services Agreement
Contact: Stacie Marchetti 916-774-5278 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of five (5) professional services agreements with (1) 4LEAF, Inc., (2) BPR Consulting Group LLC, (3) Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., (4) TRB and Associates, Inc., and (5) Urban37, Inc., for on-call building plan review and inspection services. The agreements include an annual not-to-exceed limit of $350,000 per contract for 4LEAF, BPR Consulting, TRB and Associates, and Urban37, and an annual not-to-exceed limit of $750,000 for Bureau Veritas due to anticipated increased workload and specialized project support. Funding is included in the Development Services Department's Contracted Building Plan Review operating budget and is fully recoverable through permit fee revenue.

Staff also recommends authorization for the City Manager to execute future amendments to extend the agreements for up to four (4) additional one-year renewal terms on behalf of the City.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt five (5) resolutions to approve On-Call Professional Services Agreements with (1) 4LEAF, Inc., (2) BPR Consulting Group LLC, (3) Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., (4) TRB and Associates, Inc., and (5) Urban37, Inc., for on-call building plan review and inspection services and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff additionally requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute up to four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with these consultants is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services Department is responsible for performing plan review and inspection services for all residential and commercial building construction within the City. During periods of significant development activity, the Department utilizes qualified consulting firms to supplement internal staffing resources to maintain targeted turnaround times and customer service levels. The Department also relies on contract inspectors during periods of prolonged vacancies, peak demand, and for specialized plan review and inspection services associated with complex development projects, or where specialized licenses or expertise are required.

Staff continues to rely on contracted services for plan review and specialized inspections related to the ongoing Bosch Semiconductor Facility project. Additionally, contracted services are used to maintain continuity of review for large or complex commercial structures within the City, including the Westfield Galleria. The use of qualified consultants strengthens the Department's ability to respond to fluctuating workloads while maintaining a high level of customer service.

Page 2577 of 3513 ends

To support these needs, the City issued a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) for on-call building plan review and inspection services on February 19, 2026. Twelve (12) firms submitted proposals in response to the RFP, and eight (8) firms were selected for interviews based on the initial evaluation and ranking process. Following interviews and final evaluations, five (5) firms consisting of (1) 4LEAF, Inc., (2) BPR Consulting Group, (3) Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., (4) TRB and Associates, Inc., and (5) Urban37, Inc. ranked highest based on experience and qualifications, service approach, and cost.

Consistent with best and past practices, five (5) separate firms will be engaged to reduce potential conflicts of interest that may arise from existing or future contractual relationships with private entities. To ensure consistency and maintain the City's customer service expectations, staff will regularly coordinate and meet with the consultant firms throughout the duration of the contracts.

If approved, the initial terms of the agreements will commence on July 1, 2026, and expire on June 30, 2027. The agreements authorize the City Manager to extend each agreement in one-year increments for up to an additional four (4) years. All costs associated with on-call building plan review and inspection services are fully recoverable through permit fee revenue and will have no net impact on the General Fund.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contracts with 4LEAF, Inc., BPR Consulting Group, TRB and Associates, Inc., and Urban37, Inc. shall not exceed $350,000 per fiscal year for each agreement. To support continuity of services and the increased workload associated with the ongoing Bosch Semiconductor Facility project and specialized plan review and inspection services, including services related to the Westfield Galleria, the contract with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., shall not exceed $750,000 per fiscal year unless otherwise approved by the City Council through a future contract amendment.

Funding for these professional services is included in the Development Services Department's annual operating budget. All costs associated with on-call building plan review and inspection services are fully recoverable through permit fee revenue generated by development activity, resulting in no net fiscal impact on the General Fund.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Stacie Marchetti, Management Analyst

Page 2578 of 3513 ends

Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-210

2. 4LEAF FY27 PSA

3. Resolution 26-211

4. BPR FY27 PSA

5. Resolution 26-212

6. Bureau Veritas FY27 PSA

7. Resolution 23-213

8. TRB FY27 PSA

9. Resolution 26-214

10. Urban37 FY27 PSA

11. Intent to Award Notification RFP 06-0009

12. Master Averaged Score Sheet

13. Interview ranking Sheet

14. Proposal Ranking Sheet
REVIEWERS:

Cheri McGrath, Development Services Department - Business Services Division
Created/Initiated -
5/26/2026
Joe Allen, Development Services Department - Business Services Division Approved - 5/27/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 5/27/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/2/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/2/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/2/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/8/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/8/2026

Page 2579 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-210

APPROVING AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND 4LEAF, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, an On-Call Professional Services Agreement for Building Plan Review and Inspection Services, by and between the City of Roseville and 4LEAF, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said on-call professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2580 of 3513 ends

Page 2581 of 3513 ends

Page 2582 of 3513 ends

Page 2583 of 3513 ends

Page 2584 of 3513 ends

Page 2585 of 3513 ends

Page 2586 of 3513 ends

Page 2587 of 3513 ends

Page 2588 of 3513 ends

Page 2589 of 3513 ends

Page 2590 of 3513 ends

Page 2591 of 3513 ends

Page 2592 of 3513 ends

Page 2593 of 3513 ends

Page 2594 of 3513 ends

Page 2595 of 3513 ends

Page 2596 of 3513 ends

Page 2597 of 3513 ends

Page 2598 of 3513 ends

Page 2599 of 3513 ends

Page 2600 of 3513 ends

Page 2601 of 3513 ends

Page 2602 of 3513 ends

Page 2603 of 3513 ends

Page 2604 of 3513 ends

Page 2605 of 3513 ends

Page 2606 of 3513 ends

Page 2607 of 3513 ends

Page 2608 of 3513 ends

Page 2609 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-211

APPROVING AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an On-Call Professional Services Agreement for Building Plan Review and Inspection Services, by and between the City of Roseville and BPR Consulting Group LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2610 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx ;05/13/2026]

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and BPR Consulting Group LLC, a California limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY issued Request for Proposal # 06-0009 for professional services consisting of on-call building plan review and inspection services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has prepared a response to the Request for Proposal dated March 24, 2026, which describes the scope of services to be performed by CONSULTANT, and the hourly rates for performance of such services; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and experienced to provide professional building plan review and inspection services on an on-call basis.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

Page 2611 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 2 2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of the on-call services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Individual tasks will be awarded by CITY on an as-needed basis. CITY may assign work to one, or more than one consultant from an approved qualified list. CITY reserves the right to unilaterally assign work to any consultant as it deems prudent or, if no services are required, no work. CITY makes no specific guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours or amount of tasks or services, which shall be required of any single consultant. In addition, the inclusion of any consultant on any qualified list, if so utilized by CITY, shall in no way be considered an exclusive agreement to provide service for CITY.

3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the hourly rates as described in EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Any proposed increase in the effective rates for future services must be preceded by at least a 90-day written notice to the contracting department. Total compensation shall not exceed three hundred fifty thousand dollars ($350,000) for the initial term. Total compensation for optional renewal years of this Agreement shall not exceed three hundred fifty thousand dollars ($350,000). Total compensation for the initial term and all optional renewal years shall not exceed one million, seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,750,000). Adjustment to the total compensation per year shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, subject to approval by the City Council.

Page 2612 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 3 thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

Page 2613 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 4 COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and

Page 2614 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 5 limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full

Page 2615 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 6 certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

Page 2616 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 7 expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at

Page 2617 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 8 the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

9. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

10. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all

Page 2618 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 9 conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

Page 2619 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 10 similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

Page 2620 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 11 Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

19. Termination of Agreement. CITY may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

Page 2621 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 12 20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Development Services Department BPR Consulting Group
Attn: Mike Isom Attn: Ron Beehler
311 Vernon Street 2130 Professional Drive, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678 Roseville, CA 95661
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

Page 2622 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\BPR Consulting Group.docx; 05/13/2026] 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a BPR CONSULTING GROUP, LLC,
municipal corporation a California limited liability company BY:_______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY:_______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

MIKE ISOM
Development Services Director

Page 2623 of 3513 ends

EXHIBIT “A”

Page 2624 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
TAB D

SERVICE UNDERSTANDING
BPR Consulting Group’s staff members have provided services to the City of Roseville for many years, and we have assisted the City to develop policies and standards, and other service
enhancements. Our staff has developed excellent working relationships with City staff. Additionally, BPR staff are experienced working with many of the City’s largest developers and builders.

General Approach / Scope of Work
BPR Consulting Group understands the scope of services requested by the City and we are prepared to complete these services as required by the City.
 Primary Point of Contact: The City’s single point of contact will be Bill Rodgers. Bill has worked closely with the City on a wide range of projects for many years. His contact information is as follows:

Bill Rodgers, SE
2130 Professional Drive
Suite #150
Roseville, CA 95661
916.662.0665 | [email protected]
 Response Times: BPR staff will respond to requests for services and project questions from City staff within one business day.
 Electronic document review: BPR staff will perform plan check reviews on the City’s electronic document review system (DigEplan), and will status our work in Accela in accordance with City instructions.  Communication with Applicants: BPR staff understand the importance of professional, respectful communications. We understand that we represent the City to applicants while conducting our work. Our team will communicate directly with applicants and other applicable City and County departments through the plan review and/or inspection process.
 City’s permitting system: BPR staff will update workflow status and enter review charges in the City’s Accela permitting system. Approved hourly charges will be entered into Accela for City review and approval prior to updating workflow status.
 Plan review timeframes: BPR is committed to completing plan review services within a timeframe that meets or exceeds the City’s requirements. As described in the City’s RFP, we understand the first review is to be performed within 13 business days and any subsequent review (resubmittal, revision or deferred

Page 40 ends

Page 2625 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
submittal) within 8 business days. If for any reason we aren unable to meet the designated timeframes, we will notify the applicant and the City of when to expect completion.  Expedited plan review: Upon notification of the need for expedited plan review, BPR will confirm our ability to provide the expedited services and establish a schedule with the applicant, while conveying that information to the City. As outlined in the RFP, we understand the first review is to be performed within 6 business days and any subsequent review (resubmittals), within 6 business days.  Third-party plan review services: BPR is ready and able to provide third-party plan review services upon request from the City.
 Field inspection services: We have proposed a team of building inspectors who are able to provide comprehensive building inspection services on an as-needed basis.  Weekly Status Reports: We will provide the City with weekly status reports on call City plan review projects in progress.
 Availability to meet with City staff: BPR project management and staff are always available to meet with City staff, either in-person or virtually, on an as-needed basis and/or on a regularly scheduled basis. Our team will attend quarterly coordination meeting at the City’s Civic Center as requested at no additional charge to the City. Our staff will also attend intermittent, project-specific meetings at the City of Roseville Civic Center at the request of the City.
 Minimum Qualifications: BPR project staff will meet or exceed the City’s minimum qualifications for each service type. The staff we have proposed to provide these services are either registered design professionals or hold current ICC certifications in the disciplines for which they are proposed. Updated resumes for staff members and a updated organizational chart will be provided to the City on an annual basis as requested.  Plan Review Consultants Standards: BPR staff will follow the the City’s Plan Review Consultant Standards, Policy number 1.6 as showin in Attachement F of the RFP, when providing plan review services for the City of Roseville.
 Applicable Codes: BPR staff will review plans and/or inspect for compliance with California Building Code (CBC), California Residential Code (CRC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California Plumbing Code (CPC), California Electrical Code (CEC), California Energy Code (CEC Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code), California Green Building Standards Code (CGBSC), California Fire Code (CFC), applicable municipal codes and standards as adopted and amended by the City of Roseville.  Plan Review / Inspection Approval: BPR plans examiners will not recommend plan review approval to the City until all code compliance issues are resolved and all City requirements for permit issuance are satisfied.

Similiarly, BPR inspectors will not recommend inspection approval to the City until all code compliance issues are resolved.
 Plan Review Services: BPR will perform services, including complete plan review, administration and transportation of documents to and from the City Permit Center within the aggeed upon time frames established by the City.
 BPR Staff: BPR will furnish assigned staff with all necessary materials, resources and training to provide plan review and/or inspection services to the City. All staff assigned to provide services to the City will be

Page 41 ends

Page 2626 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
professionally qualified to plan review and/or inspection services. Our staff will posses the following minimum qualifications:

1. ICC Plans Examiner Certification

2. ICC Building Inspection Certification

3. Professional Architect or Engineering License

4. CASp Certification

5. A valid California Driver’s License
 Invoicing: BPR will provide monthly invoices that are itemized by technical discipline and will match charges identified in the City’s permitting system. BPR will notify the City if the charges deviate from amounts specified in the City’s permitting system prior to the time of approval.  Additional Consulting Services: BPR is prepared to provide miscellaneous technical consulting that falls outside the scope of services at the City’s request on an as-needed basis. Such services will be provided at an agreed-upon hourly rate. See Section F for additional information.  Issues or Challenges: BPR has not identified any issues or challenges that would prevent the achievement of the City’s stated goals.
 Unique Approaches and Strengths: All of our staff maintain appropriate certifications or professional licenses for the services they provide. We ensure our staff is properly trained and require ongoing training for our staff equal or greater than that required by California Health and Safety Code Section 18949.29. We continually encourage our staff to obtain additional certifications and support ongoing training and education for our staff.
 Code Quiz: BPR’s proposed Principal-in-Charge, Ron Beehler, has authored the well-received monthly Code Quiz for over eight years for multiple California ICC Chapters. The Code Quiz has become an education component of monthly ICC Chapter meetings throughout California. BPR is now the sponsor of the Code Quiz and uses the quiz as an internal training element for our staff. Current year Code Quizzes may be found on our website, http://www.bpr-grp.com/code-quiz.

We propose to provide the City the with the following:
 Customer service. Our founders and the staff working under their direction have always provided high levels of customer service to the City and its customers. BPR Consulting Group commits to continue this high level of service.
 Budget-conscious approach and implementation. Our services are provided in a cost-effective manner and will be adjusted to remain within the City’s budget constraints. We will monitor and evaluate our areas of responsibility and make recommendations for additional cost savings to the City where possible.  Tailored, City-specific services. We deliver skilled and thorough plan review and inspection services for assurance of compliance with the City’s adopted codes and ordinances. The City can expect a high-level of technical assistance to architects, engineers, contractors and most importantly homeowners. Our staff of experienced engineers, architects and inspectors possess the ability to provide code assistance through the plan checking and inspection process to help your community develop cost-effective projects that comply with the City’s Municipal Code and the California Building Standards Codes.

Page 42 ends

Page 2627 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
 Timely turnaround service. BPR staff is committed to meeting or exceeding our proposed turnaround times, and has a demonstrated history of doing so.
 Effective coordination with other City Departments. We have a history of promoting collaboration and coordination with all project stakeholders, whether internal departments or external design teams/applicants, etc.
 A wealth of code knowledge and building industry experience. Our staff is licensed and certified, and collectively possess nearly 200 years of experience in the building safety industry.  Ability to adjust service levels to meet your needs. We are skilled at assessing time commitments, developing accurate work plans, and applying dedicated, professional personnel. We have the ability to scale our staffing to suit City’s workload.
 Local presence and attention to the City of Roseville. We are locally-owned and operated. Our local presence and availability ensures a consistent level of service and the ability to respond immediately to the needs of the City of Roseville.

Page 43 ends

Page 2628 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
TAB E

SERVICE PLAN
We understand that the Building Division of the City of Roseville desires to contract with a professional consultant to provide building plan review and inspection services for a broad range of projects, from residential to commercial projects. These services include a thorough review of building plans/construction documents to ensure compliance with City Municipal Code and State of California Building Standard Code requirements, as well as thorough field inspections to ensure conformance with the approved plans and applicable codes. BPR Consulting Group has the experience and the qualifications to provide these services.

Staff proposed to provide the requested services are experienced, qualified and appropriately licensed; details can be found in Tab C of this proposal. We will not be utilizing any sub-consultants to provide the requested services.

QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Upon award of a contract, our proposed Project Manager will schedule a meeting with the City’s representative to familiarize the team with the City’s plan review and inspection requests and performance processes, methods and style. BPR’s staff of inspectors are experienced in working with multiple jurisdictions, learning and adjusting quickly so that they become an extension of your staff.

We utilize a comprehensive “New Client Checklist” that documents specific requirements of each community we serve. Upon selection and before commencement of services, we schedule a meeting with our new clients to review specific inspections requirements and systems utilized by your building department so our services can be integrated in a seamless manner.

BPR will select appropriately qualified, customer-focused inspectors with applicable experience and specific code knowledge based on the types of projects assigned for inspection and the level of inspector being requested. All BPR inspectors are ICC certified, with many maintaining CASp certification. In addition, BPR employs OSHPD certified inspectors available for inspection of OSHPD designated facilities. Qualified inspectors with the appropriate experience, certifications and proficiency will be assigned as appropriate.

Qualified inspectors with appropriate knowledge and experience with residential and commercial buildings of all construction types will be assigned as appropriate.

Assigned staff will perform assigned inspections to verify that the work of construction is in conformance with the approved project plans as well as identifying issues of non-compliance with applicable building codes.

When necessary for large or fast-track projects, multiple inspectors are available.

Projects under construction by permit from the City will be inspected for compliance with the State of California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, Energy, Green, and Fire Codes. Projects will also be inspected for conformance with the accessibility, noise and energy conservation requirements as mandated by the State of California’s Title 24, applicable ordinances and NPDES requirements as assigned. Inspectors are accessible and available to meet with the project design team and/or the client’s representatives to work out problems and

Page 44 ends

Page 2629 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
help resolve issues quickly and efficiently. As necessary, inspectors will perform follow-up inspections to verify correction notices. Our inspection staff easily integrate into client organizations, consistently implementing policies and procedures and remaining transparent to the jurisdiction’s applicants and customers.

We understand that personality and customer service is crucial to on-the-job success, therefore, we will select building inspectors who are customer service-oriented and skilled in dealing with people both at the public counter and in the field. All building inspection personnel assigned will be ICC certified as required and have the knowledge and ability to update the City’s permitting database on a daily basis with inspection results.

Utilizing well qualified and experienced building and
fire inspectors reduces the potential for critical code related items not being thoroughly verified during the
inspection process. Late calls on critical code related issues or identification of deviations from the
approved plans late in the inspection process can
result in avoidable project delays. We meet with our
inspection team on a weekly basis to discuss
inspection-related code provisions and more
importantly, inspection issues that can become
problematic. We believe that through utilization of
experienced, well-qualified inspection staff, and
providing ongoing training for our inspection staff many common inspection-related issues can be avoided.

BPR’s experienced and well qualified ICC/CASp certified inspectors have performed building and fire inspection services on a wide variety of construction projects including master planned developments, single-family production, custom homes, commercial, manufacturing, institutional, assembly, essential service, industrial projects, and historically designated buildings. BPR’s inspectors will inspect projects to verify conformance with approved project drawings and specifications which will include review of the permit documents to verify that onsite conditions are consistent with the approved documents for size, setbacks, heights, and other applicable requirements. At the completion of inspections, BPR’s inspectors will accurately update database information and complete necessary forms and documents as required to provide seamless service.

BPR will utilize appropriately qualified inspectors with applicable experience and specific code knowledge based on the types of projects assigned for inspection. Inspection personnel will have the ability to read, understand and interpret construction plans, truss drawings and calculations, fire sprinkler plans, prepare and maintain accurate records and reports, communicate effectively orally and in writing and to work effectively with contractors, permit applicants, homeowners and agency staff. Inspectors will possess knowledge of approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety used in building inspection and the most current building and fire standards.

Page 45 ends

Page 2630 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Maximum Proposed Turnaround Times for Building Plan Check We are committed to meeting or exceeding the City’s required plan check timeframes. We consistently complete plan reviews within required timeframes for both commercial and residential projects as our standard business practice. We strive to accommodate any turnaround schedule desired by the City. Multidisciplinary plan reviews are typically performed in our offices, but we are available for onsite work when required, upon the City’s request.

We propose the following turn-around times for initial checks and re-checks:

Expedited plan review will be provided within the six (6) working day time frames established by the City of Roseville.

Project Type
Maximum Turn-Around Time
(Business Days)
Initial Submittal Backcheck Reviews
Residential (Single Family)
New Construction 10 5
Addition 10 5
Remodel 10 5
Residential Solar 3 3
Non-Residential
New Construction 10 5
Addition 10 5
Remodel, Tenant Improvement 10 5
Large, Complex Commercial or
Residential Multi-Family Projects Turnaround times negotiated on a project-by-project basis

Page 46 ends

Page 2631 of 3513 ends

EXHIBIT “B”

Page 2632 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
TAB F

COST PROPOSAL
Building and Fire Plan Review – Fees
For building and fire plan review services, we agree to the City’s proposed breakdown of costs as follows:

Package A: Complete commercial plan review for private development projects including CBC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CEC Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code, CGBSC, and CFC, applicable Roseville Municipal Code and Roseville Fire Department Standards. Cost is to be 65 percent of the plan review fee paid to the City for each project. This fee shall include a maximum of three (3) plan review iterations. Iterations beyond the maximum number will be reimbursed at the hourly rate for additional plan review services as outlined in Package E.

Package B: Complete commercial plan review for City projects including CBC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CEC Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code, CGBSC, and CFC, applicable Roseville Municipal Code, Roseville Fire Department Standards, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Cost is to be 65 percent of the plan review fee paid to the City for each project. This fee shall include a maximum of three (3) plan review iterations.

Iterations beyond the maximum number will be reimbursed at the hourly rate for additional plan review services as outlined in Package E.

Package C: Complete residential plan review including CBC and/or CRC, CMC, CPC, CBC, CEC Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code, CGBSC, CFC (California Building Standards Commission), applicable Roseville Municipal Code and Roseville Fire Department Standards. Cost is to be 75 percent of the plan review fee paid to the City for each project. This fee shall include a maximum of three (3) plan review iterations.

Iterations beyond the maximum number will be reimbursed at the hourly rate for additional plan review services as outlined in Package E.

Package D: Complete commercial fire system plan review including CFC, applicable Roseville Municipal Code and Roseville Fire Department Standards. Cost is to be 65 percent of the plan review fee paid to the City for each project. This fee shall include a maximum of three (3) plan review iterations. Iterations beyond the maximum number will be reimbursed at the hourly rate for additional plan review services as outlined in Package E.

Package E: Additional plan review services, including revisions and deferred submittals, shall be provided at a rate of $150/hour.

Package F: Expedited plan review of the tasks outlined above. For Package A, Package B, Package C and Package D, cost is to be the percentage of the plan check fee paid to the City as designated in the applicable package and $150/hour. For Package E, cost is to be $225/hour.

Other:

For special projects, projects that are out-of-the-ordinary and require special considerations, miscellaneous technical consultation serviced, or long-term in-house support services, we propose to negotiate a mutually

Page 47 ends

Page 2633 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
agreeable fee based on the specific project, considering the special circumstances involved and the experience of the staff required to provide the requested services.

Notes:
 BPR will not charge for mileage, shipping costs or courier fees for plan pick-up and delivery.  Per City approval, cost for partial reviews such as structural-only, foundation-only, electrical-only, preliminary reviews, etc., will be the hourly rate specified in Package E.  Review of deferred submittals (defined by CBC 107.3.4.2) submitted after a project has been approved will be billed using the hourly rate specified in Package E.  Review of revisions to previously approved drawings will be billed using the hourly rate specified in Package E.
 In the event submittal documents are deemed incomplete or changed so as to require more than three (3) plan review iterations, additional plan reviews may be billed using the hourly rate specified in Package E, with prior approval from the City.

Building Inspection – Fees
For building inspection services, we will bill for services at the hourly rates shown in the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates included below. Building inspectors will be assigned based on experience relative to the complexity and specific requirements for the inspections to be performed.

Page 48 ends

Page 2634 of 3513 ends

CITY OF ROSEVILLE | RFP 06-0009

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
The hourly billing rates shown below will be applied to building plan review, inspection services and additional services outside the scope-of-work specifically requested by the City and detailed above. These rates will remain unchanged through the initial term of the contract. In the event of a contract extension, we would appreciate the opportunity to revisit these rates to reflect appropriate cost-of-living-adjustments (COLA). *Depending on qualifications and experience
 Overtime: Inspection services and other hourly services provided within City offices in excess of eight hours per day, nights, and weekends will be charged at 140% of the billing rates indicated above.
 Mileage Expenses: Mileage utilized while performing inspection services will be charged at the current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) vehicle mileage rates plus 20%.  Minimum Daily Charge: There will be a minimum 8-hour daily charge for all on-call plan review, inspection, permit technician and support services provided within City offices.  Cost Escalation: On each anniversary of the contract start date, BPR may increase hourly rates based on the change of the non-seasonally adjusted CPI for the applicable region, not to exceed 3% annually.
 Hourly Rates: All hourly rates include salaries, benefits, workers compensation insurance and miscellaneous office expenses.

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Licensed Plan Review Engineer or Architect
(structural, civil, electrical, mechanical, fire protection) $150 Engineering Plans Examiner 150
ICC Certified Plans Examiner 150
CASp Plans Examiner 150
CASp Inspector 145
ICC Certified Inspector 95 to 120*
ICC Fire Plans Examiner 150
ICC Fire Inspector 125
Plan Intake Coordinator 100
Permit Technician 80
Permit Technician Trainee/ Building Department Support Staff 55

Page 49 ends

Page 2635 of 3513 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 26-212

APPROVING AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF

OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an On-Call Professional Services Agreement for Building Plan Review and Inspection Services, by and between the City of Roseville and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 2636 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx ;05/13/2026]

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and W I T N E S S E T H:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

Page 2637 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 2 2. Services. CONSULTANT shall perform, at the direction of CITY, the scope of the on-call services as described in EXHIBIT “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Individual tasks will be awarded by CITY on an as-needed basis. CITY may assign work to one, or more than one consultant from an approved qualified list. CITY reserves the right to unilaterally assign work to any consultant as it deems prudent or, if no services are required, no work. CITY makes no specific guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours or amount of tasks or services, which shall be required of any single consultant. In addition, the inclusion of any consultant on any qualified list, if so utilized by CITY, shall in no way be considered an exclusive agreement to provide service for CITY.

3. Compensation. For its services provided hereunder, CONSULTANT shall be compensated on a time and expense basis in accordance with the hourly rates as described in EXHIBIT “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Any proposed increase in the effective rates for future services must be preceded by at least a 90-day written notice to the contracting department. Total compensation shall not exceed seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) for the initial term. Total compensation for optional renewal years of this Agreement shall not exceed seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000). Total compensation for the initial term and all optional renewal years shall not exceed three million, seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($3,750,000). Adjustment to the total compensation per year shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, subject to approval by the City Council.

Page 2638 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 3 thirty (30) days after receipt, if the services specified in the invoice have been satisfactorily completed.

5. Insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to continuously maintain, in full force and effect, the following minimum policies of insurance during the term of this Agreement.

Page 2639 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 4 COVERAGE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit
Professional Liability (errors and $1,000,000 per claim omissions) $2,000,000 aggregate
a. Form. CONSULTANT shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. b. Additional Insureds. CONSULTANT shall also provide a separate endorsement form or section of the policy showing CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of CONSULTANT. The additional insured coverage under the CONSULTANT’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from CITY’s insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be: (1) the minimum coverage and

Page 2640 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 5 limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater. c. Cancellation/Modification. CONSULTANT shall provide ten (10) days written notice to CITY prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
d. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of CITY (if agreed to in a written contract) before CITY’s own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. e. Subcontractors. CONSULTANT agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY. CITY reserves the right to obtain a full

Page 2641 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 6 certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
g. Waiver of Subrogation. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire from CONSULTANT by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all worked performed by CONSULTANT, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
h. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve CONSULTANT of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude CITY from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

Page 2642 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 7 expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall include this provision in its contracts with all subcontractors.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, general prevailing wage rates set forth above, which forms a part of this Agreement, shall be posted by CONSULTANT at a prominent place at

Page 2643 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 8 the work site. Prevailing wage rates to be posted at the work site will be furnished by the contracting department. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by CONSULTANT in determining its proposal and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY or the Agreement.

9. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

10. Compliance with Laws. CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all

Page 2644 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 9 conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

12. Ability to Perform. CONSULTANT agrees and represents that it has the time, ability and professional expertise to perform the services required under this Agreement.

14. Assignment. CONSULTANT is employed to perform unique personal services.

CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall not employ or otherwise incur any obligation to pay other specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement, without prior written consent of CITY.

Page 2645 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 10 similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY’s on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

17. Successors in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

Page 2646 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 11 Agreement. Material constitutes the scope of work outlined in Exhibit A and attached hereto, and all written and other tangible expressions, including but not limited to, drawings (including computer aided drawings), papers, documents, reports, surveys, renderings, exhibits, sketches, maps, models, prints, paintings or photographs, in any and all media or formats in which such materials have been created or are maintained. All Material furnished by CONSULTANT is, and shall remain, the property of CITY.

CONSULTANT shall execute any documents necessary to effectuate such assignment.

19. Termination of Agreement. CITY may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving CONSULTANT ten (10) days advance written notice from the City Manager.

Page 2647 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 12 20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

21. Modification. This Agreement and each provision contained herein may be waived, amended, supplemented or eliminated only by mutual written agreement of the parties.

23. Notices. Any notices to parties required by this Agreement shall be delivered personally or mailed, U.S. first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE CONSULTANT
Development Services Department Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Attn: Mike Isom Attn: Craig Baptista
311 Vernon Street 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678 Sacramento, CA 95834
Either party may amend its address for notice by giving notice to the other party in writing.

24. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.

Page 2648 of 3513 ends

[B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2026\Building Plan Review and Inspection Services On-Call PSA\Bureau Veritas North America Inc.docx; 05/13/2026] 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA,
municipal corporation INC., a Delaware corporation
BY:_______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY:_______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

MIKE ISOM
Development Services Director

Page 2649 of 3513 ends

EXHIBIT “A”

Page 2650 of 3513 ends

38 BUREAU VERITAS 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150, Sacramento, CA 95834 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com

5.6 TAB D: SERVICE UNDERSTANDING

SERVICE UNDERSTANDING
BV understands that the City of Roseville is seeking consultants to provide Building Plan Review and Inspection Services. We are uniquely qualifed to provide these services to the City due to our our decade-long relationship, intimate knowledge of the City’s needs and consistent and successful delivery of services.

We have provided plan review services to the City on multiple large projects, including 10 years of service on Westfield Galleria at Roseville, recently including a new bowling, cinema and amusement center tenant improvement. Other new
projects include a 5-story Kaiser Medical Office Building & Pavilion, Main Street Plaza Apartments and Retail Offices, and Lifetime Fitness Center.

BV is currently providing building safety support at the Bosch Semiconductor facility.

BV maintains a robust staff and breadth of resources which allows us to expand or contract our services based on the needs of the City of Roseville.

BV is able to meet all of the requirements of the City’s current RFP. We are in agreement to provide the following Scope of Services outlined in the RFP, including, but not limited to:
• Designate one individual as the responsible contact for communications between the City and Consultant.
• Respond to requests for service and project specific
questions from City staff within one business day.
• Provide electronic plan check services using computer programs or platforms specified or deployed by the City, which may be
modified from
time to time
at the City’s
discretion.
• Upon receiving
the request
for plan review
service, proceed
with electronic
plan review
of plan and
construction
documents
through the
assigned
platforms
designated by
the City.
• Communicate
directly with
applicants and
other applicable
City and County
departments through the plan review and/or inspection
process.
• Upon request, evaluate and confirm or deny the ability to accommodate expedited plan review services, as
outlined in the City’s agreement for expedited plan
review (Attachment E).
• Upon request, have the ability to accommodate third
party plan review services, as outlined in the City’s
agreement for third party review (Attachment F).

Compensation shall be negotiated for this service, as
needed.
• Upon request, have the ability to provide field inspection services. Compensation to be negotiated for this service as needed. Provide range of hourly rates for this service. • Provide a weekly status report on all City plan review projects in progress.
• Attend quarterly coordination meetings at the City of Roseville civic center at no additional cost to the City. • Attend intermittent, project-specific meetings at the City of Roseville civic center.
• On an annual basis, provide an updated organizational chart and resume for each staff member, and designate
a responsible contact person assigned to respond to
requests for the City.
• Follow the City’s Plan Review Consultant Standards,
Policy number 1.6.

Page 2651 of 3513 ends

39 BUREAU VERITAS 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150, Sacramento, CA 95834 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com

5.6 TAB D: SERVICE UNDERSTANDING
• BV shall review plans and/or inspect for compliance with California Building Code (CBC), California Residential
Code (CRC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California • Plumbing Code (CPC), California Electrical Code (CEC), California Energy Code (CEC Part 6 of the California
Building Standards Code), California Green Building
Standards Code (CGBSC), California Fire Code (CFC),
applicable municipal codes and standards as adopted
and amended by the City of Roseville.
• BV shall not recommend plan review approval to the City until all code compliance issues are resolved and all City requirements for permit issuance are satisfied. BV shall not recommend inspection approval to the City until all code compliance issues are resolved. BV shall contact the City if there are any questions.
• BV shall perform services, including complete plan
review, administration and, if applicable, transportation of documents to and from the Permit Center, within
appropriate timeframes established by the City. First
review is to be performed within 13 business days and
any subsequent review (resubmittal, revision or deferred submittal) within 8 business days. In the event that BV cannot perform these services within the designated
timeframes, BV shall notify the applicant and the City of when to expect completion.
• BV shall perform expedited services, including
complete plan review, administration and, if applicable, transportation of documents to and from the Permit
Center, within appropriate timeframes established by
the City. First review is to be performed within 6 business days and any subsequent review (resubmittals), within 6 business days. In the event that BV cannot perform these services within the designated timeframes, BV shall notify the applicant and the City of when to expect completion. • BV shall furnish assigned personnel with all necessary materials, resources and training to provide plan review and/or inspection services for the City. BV shall assign personnel who are professionally qualified to perform
plan review and/or inspection services. BV shall possess the following minimum qualifications:
» ICC Plans Examiner Certification
» ICC Building Inspector Certification or equivalent
» Professional Architect or Engineer License
» CASp Certification
» Valid California driver’s license
• BV shall be granted access to the City’s electronic
document review system (DigEplan) to perform plan
check reviews.
• BV shall be granted access to the City’s permitting system (Accela) to update workflow status and submit review
charges.
• BV shall upload all charges assessed at an hourly rate to the City’s permitting system prior to updating workflow status and approval.
• BV will notify the City immediately if charges deviate from amounts specified in the City’s permitting system
at time of approval. This information must be emailed
to [email protected] within 2
business days of the date of approval.
• The invoices shall be itemized by technical discipline for auditing purposes.
• Invoices shall be emailed to DSAccounting@roseville.
ca.us monthly. The monthly invoices shall match charges identified in the City’s permitting system. Should a
discrepancy occur, and the City was not notified of the deviation via email within 2 business days of the date of approval, the City will not approve the additional charges. • BV will email monthly statements to
[email protected] to ensure
invoices are being received and paid in a timely manner. • BV shall agree to provide miscellaneous technical
consulting to the City on an as-needed basis at mutually agreed upon hourly rates.

BV team members are familiar and proficient in the use of the City of Roseville’s digital plan review platform, DigEplan.

In collaboration with your team, we are well positioned seamlessly continue to meet your plan review needs with the use of this platform.

Page 2652 of 3513 ends

40 BUREAU VERITAS 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150, Sacramento, CA 95834 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com

5.7 TAB E: SERVICE PLAN

BUILDING PLAN CHECK SERVICES
BV has the capacity to provide the following plan review, inspections and permitting services to the City of Roseville:
• Architectural plans examination
• Structural plans structural calculations and engineering reports examination for compliance
• OSHPD and Commercial Modular (“Commercial Coach”)
Site and Foundation reviews
• OSHPAD III reviews for Healthcare facilities
• Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing code (MEP) plans examination
• Review and approval of alternate materials, alternative design and methods of construction
• Energy code plans examination
• Accessibility requirements including:
» Barrier free plans examination requirements
» Disabled access
» CASp
» ADA
• Green Building and LEED consulting including:
» LEED submittal consultation
» Green building consulting including CAL Green
» ENERGY STAR verification
» Energy efficiency audits
• Solar
• Civil Plans Examination including:
» Soils, grading and drainage
» NPDES/SWPPP
» Development
» Infrastructure
» Water and wastewater
» Sewer
• Fire, life & safety plan reviews including:
» Fire sprinkler/fire alarm
» Smoke detection and dampers
» Underground fire systems
Architectural Review
BV blends the knowledge of local conditions with a large pool of California licensed or certified building safety experts equipped to handle all building department needs. The firm is able to tailor its solutions specific to the City as a result of having provided plan review, inspection services, specialty reviews, and municipal administrative support for over 50 years.

Structural Review
BV is uniquely qualified and experienced in structural review and inspection. The firm has plan review and inspection personnel which have specialized experience with multifamily residential, hotels, resorts, retail, commercial, industrial, high-tech facilities, etc. BV has several experienced structural engineers on staff who are immediately available to tackle the City’s most complex projects. BV can provide a complete structural review of design drawings, details, and calculations for both vertical loads and lateral seismic and wind forces, in accordance with the California Building Code structural provisions.

Mechanical Review
The California Building Code is supported by ancillary codes such as the California Mechanical Code and any others
specifically designated and adopted by the City. BV’s staff includes licensed and certified mechanical engineers and inspectors who have the knowledge, training, and experience necessary to review plans for compliance with these codes.

Firm staff, who are available immediately to the City, have reviewed heating, cooling, distribution and return air systems, hoods, and product conveyance system plans for a variety of projects including single family residential, multi-family residential, custom homes, resorts, and hotels.

Electrical Review
Electrical review and inspection to verify energy compliance is included in all projects in accordance with mandates from the applicable energy standards for non-residential construction.

The firm has licensed and certified electrical engineers and inspectors with extensive plan review and inspection experience which have reviewed service installation,
transformers, emergency power, panel distribution, single line diagrams, power, and lighting system plans for single family residential, multi family residential, custom homes, resorts, and hotels.

Plumbing Review
The California Building Code is supported by ancillary
codes such as the California Plumbing Code and any others specifically designated and adopted by the City. BV’s staff has the knowledge, training, and experience necessary to review plans and inspect construction for compliance with these codes. The firm has licensed and certified mechanical engineers on staff to assist with plumbing reviews when needed. Firm staff have reviewed fuel gas, medical gas, potable and non-potable water piping and waste piping systems, and rainwater system plans for single family residential, multi family residential, custom homes, resorts, and hotels.

CASp / Disabled Access Review
BV has CASp certified individuals who are able to respond to the needs of the City quickly. The firm currently provides CASp certified individuals to jurisdictions throughout California to meet the requirements of SB 1608. Additionally, the team includes ICC Certified accessibility plans examiners and inspectors who routinely conduct accessibility reviews of

Page 2653 of 3513 ends

41 BUREAU VERITAS 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150, Sacramento, CA 95834 P. 916.725.4200 | F. 916.725.8242 | www.bvna.com

5.7 TAB E: SERVICE PLAN
projects throughout the state from minor restroom upgrades to significant ADA compliance improvements.

Green Building Review
BV has plan review engineers, plans examiners, and inspectors who are well versed and experienced with energy code
compliance. Firm staff have been involved at various levels of energy code development in California and are certified to review and inspect for energy codes. BV staff have reviewed plans, and inspected projects, which incorporate new
technology, and complex energy code compliance. The firm has staff available to the City who are CAL Green Certified.

Civil Engineering Review
BV’s professional staff will familiarize themselves with all city, state, and federal requirements applicable to the project before beginning a review. Requirements for civil infrastructure originate from multiple sources including statutory
requirements, local ordinances and design guidelines, federal requirements including ADA and NPDES, state requirements, and the requirements of any affected utilities, districts, or agencies.

Civil infrastructure and site plans are reviewed for conformance to the following quality standards:
• Greenbook
• Geotechnical report recommendations
• Conditions of approval of the use permit or tentative map • Municipal code and local ordinances
• Jurisdiction’s design guidelines and standard plans and specifications
• ADA and Title 24 accessibility standards
• NPDES C.3 requirements when applicable
• Environmental mitigation requirements
• Requirements of affected outside agencies and utility districts
Fire Plan Review
BV staff have the capacity to consult closely with the local Fire Department Chief or their designated representative on any areas which require code interpretation or where alternate methods are being proposed and considered. The firm’s
proposed fire plan check engineers have specific experience working with multiple types of facilities to ensure compliance with applicable codes, standards, and amendments,
including CFC, CBC, the Adopted National Fire Protection Standards, the California Health and Safety Codes, CSFM, and U.L. BV’s experience includes written comments and
verbal communication with applicants to better understand requirements and provide direction for compliance, as well as close communication with fire departments to clarify policies, code interpretations, plan review status, and procedures. BV has reviewed hundreds of projects for fire safety components, including NFPA 13, NFPA. 72, and NFPA 101, among others.

BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES OVERVIEW
In addition to the requested necessary deliverables outlined in the City of Roseville’s RFQ, (pre-construction meetings, phone calls, photo uploads, My Government Online (MGO), etc.), BV inspectors are ICC certified and have extensive experience in the construction trades as well. BV inspectors are certified, at minimum, as either a Combination Residential Building Inspector or Combination Commercial Building Inspector.

Fast track projects may be built into small phases based on incremental design and fabrication steps. In such cases, the firm’s inspection team keeps daily logs to track corrections and plan review changes.

Inspector of Record
Bureau Veritas brings unparalleled expertise in serving as Inspector of Record (IOR) for building construction projects throughout California and the West Coast. BV’s team of ICCcertified inspectors ensures rigorous code compliance against adopted California Building Codes, approved construction drawings, and project-specific documentation including RFIs, revisions, and shop drawings. Our inspectors are trained in comprehensive quality assurance protocols, maintain
detailed daily logs, photographs, and inspection records, and coordinate seamlessly with project teams—from preconstruction meetings through final occupancy—to verify that all work conforms to approved plans and applicable regulations. Whether conducting routine inspections, special inspections (CASp accessibility, fire protection systems, or structural work), or managing complex multi-phase
construction sequences, BV’s IOR services provide jurisdictions with the technical rigor, responsiveness, and documentation integrity necessary to protect public safety and maintain regulatory compliance throughout the construction lifecycle.

Inspections Approach
The BV team has a two-step approach to ensuring the delivery of high quality services. BV is subject to regular controls and audits by authorities and accreditation bodies to ensure that its procedures, the qualifications of its personnel and its management systems comply with the applicable
standards, norms, references or regulations. To maintain the accreditations and certifications, quality assurance methods are built into every function of our service. Quality assurance is achieved through a number of systems and tools.
• Service goals for timeliness, quality and professionalism are defined and tracked
• Training and education is required
• Random audits are performed
• Documented procedures are accessible, monitored, and
updated

Page 2654 of 3513 ends

Roseville City CouncilJune 17, 2026

Roseville City Council
June 17, 2026