Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, May 5, 2026 (part 11 of 13)

Table 23. Existing Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection
Traffic
Control
PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

LOS LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal A A
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd. Signal C C
Santiago St/Civic Center Dr. AWSC B B
Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC B A
SARTC Fwy/Santa Ana Blvd OWSC A B
Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd OWSC F F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal C C
AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; OWSC – one-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in terms of seconds.

Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
As shown in Table 23, all study area intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS with the exception of:
• Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours.

It should be noted that this location experiences substantial delays on the minor street approach (Fuller Street) due to the high volume on Santa Ana Boulevard that is not required to stop.

Utilizing FHWA’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Signal Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Warrant), this location does not warrant a signal under existing conditions.

4.1.1.4 Access, Circulation, and Parking
Within the City, on-street parking is prohibited on principal, major, primary, and secondary arterials wherever possible and is permitted on local streets unless specifically prohibited. Onstreet parking is located throughout the project area in neighboring streets and is utilized by residents and businesses in the surrounding the project site. No parking is allowed on Santiago Street west of the SARTC station or on Santa Ana Boulevard north of the SARTC station.

There are two surface parking lots with a total of 282 spaces, and one four-story parking structure with 423 spaces at the SARTC station. The parking structure is open to the public from 4:00 AM to midnight daily. A Park and Ride facility is also located at the SARTC station for EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2803 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-4
those who chose to carpool or use public transportation; parking for travelers and visitors is free, up to 72 hours.

Local streets in the project vicinity that would be affected by the proposed project include arterial roadways that provide access to neighboring areas and also to the regional freeway system. These local roadways include 4th Street, Santa Ana Boulevard, Grand Avenue, and Santiago Street. A brief description of each roadway was provided earlier under, Caltrans Facilities and the Local Street System.

4.1.1.5 Public Transportation
OCTA is the main transit service provider in Orange County, and it offers a wide range of services including an extensive network of fixed-route transit service throughout Orange County.

SARTC is just south of the proposed project on the southeast corner of Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard. It serves as a transfer point for OCTA buses, Metrolink, and Amtrak.

The following OCTA bus routes directly serve the project study area:
• Route 59 (Anaheim to Irvine via Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue/Von Karman Avenue): Local fixed-route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard in the study area with service provided every 20 minutes. A total of three bus stops are provided on the south side of Santa Ana Boulevard (eastbound): between the existing tracks and the SARTC driveway, just east of Fuller Street, and just west of Grand Avenue. Three bus stops are provided on the north side of Santa Ana Boulevard (westbound): between Logan Street and Santiago Street, between Fuller Street and the railroad tracks, and between the I-5 ramps and Grand Avenue. • Route 83 (Anaheim to Laguna Hills via I-5/Main Street): Local fixed-route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard within the study area. Service frequency varies from 20 to 35 minutes. Two bus stops are located on the south side of Santa Ana Boulevard (eastbound): between the existing tracks and the SARTC driveway, and just east of Fuller Street. Three bus stops are located on the north side of Santa Ana Boulevard (westbound): between Logan Street and Santiago Street, between Fuller Street and the railroad tracks, and between the I-5 ramps and Grand Avenue. • Route 206 (Santa Ana to Lake Forest Express via I-5): Intracounty express route that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard within the study area, with service every 30 minutes.

A total of three bus stops are provided on the south side of Santa Ana Boulevard (eastbound): between the existing tracks and the SARTC driveway, just east of Fuller Street, and just west of Grand Avenue. Three bus stops are located on the north side of Santa Ana Boulevard (westbound): between Logan Street and Santiago Street, between Fuller Street and the railroad tracks, and between the I-5 ramps and Grand Avenue. • Route 462 (The Depot at Santa Ana to Civic Center via Santa Ana Boulevard/Civic Center Drive): Stationlink Metrolink rail feeder route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard and Civic Center Drive within the study area, with service every 15 minutes. There are currently no on-street bus stops within the project area. The only stop is provided at The Depot at Santa Ana.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2804 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-5
• Route 463 (The Depot at Santa Ana to Hutton Centre via Grand Avenue): Stationlink Metrolink rail feeder route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard and Grand Avenue within the study area, with service every 15 minutes. There are currently no onstreet bus stops within the project area. The only stop is provided at The Depot at Santa Ana.
• Route 464 (The Depot at Santa Ana to Costa Mesa via I-5/SR-55/Sunflower Avenue):

Stationlink Metrolink rail feeder route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard within the study area, with service every 15 minutes. There are currently no on-street bus stops within the project area. The only stop is provided at The Depot at Santa Ana.

4.1.1.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
According to the City’s Circulation Element, pedestrian travel in the City primarily occurs on the existing system of sidewalks. Given the City’s low rate of car ownership in relation to other cities in Orange County, planning efforts, would continue to improve and maintain the existing system of pedestrian facilities (sidewalks, etc.) to accommodate pedestrian travel to major activity centers and community services.

Within the project limits, sidewalks are provided on both the north and south sides of Santa Ana Boulevard, as well as the east and west sides of Santiago Street, Logan Street, and Fuller StreetFruit Street. At the intersection of Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard, pedestrian crosswalks are provided on all four approaches. Pedestrian crosswalks are also provided across the SARTC driveway, the existing Metrolink tracks, the south and west approaches of the I-5 freeway ramps, and on all four approaches at the Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection. Striped pedestrian crosswalks are not provided at Logan Street and at Fuller Street-Fruit Street.

Pedestrians can cross Santa Ana Boulevard at either Santiago Street, the I-5 ramps, or Grand Avenue.

Bicycle usage is encouraged within the City of Santa Ana; however, there are currently no striped or marked bicycle facilities within the project limits. The City’s “Bikeway Master Plan” depicts Santiago Street and 4th Street just outside of the limits of construction, as proposed Class I bike path, which provides for bicycle travel on a right-of-way completely separated from the street (City of Santa Ana 1998b). Class II bikeways proposed in the Circulation Element include the extension of the existing bikeway along Santa Ana Boulevard from the City’s Civic Center to SARTC. A Class II Bikeway would provide a striped lane for one-way travel within the street right-of-way.

4.1.1.7 Existing Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink At-Grade Crossing The existing at-grade crossing is used by several passenger rail lines including Metrolink Orange County and IEOC lines and the Amtrak Pacific Surfliner line.

For Metrolink lines, the existing service schedules include the following:
• OC Line: Two trains per hour per direction in both the weekday AM and PM peak hours and 22 trains per day in each direction.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2805 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-6
• IEOC Line: Two trains per hour per direction in both the weekday AM and PM peak hours and 20 trains per day in each direction.

Amtrak Pacific Surfliner operates with one train per day in the peak hour each way and 13 to 14 trains per day each direction. The BNSF freight rail traffic also uses this crossing with approximately 10 freight trains per day during off-peak hours, resulting in a total of 66 trains crossing during a typical weekday (AECOM 2012).

4.2 Environmental Consequences

4.2.1 Caltrans Facilities and the Local Street System
Short-term (Construction)
During the construction period, area residents and businesses near the construction zone may occasionally experience some inconvenience due to construction equipment, traffic lane closures, detours, or parking restrictions. During construction, motorists and pedestrians along Santa Ana Boulevard would experience some delays and detouring. Access to all businesses and residences within and adjacent to the study area would be maintained by way of alternative local streets as described below. During the construction period, the capacity of Santa Ana Boulevard would be reduced from a six-lane cross-section to a four-lane cross-section. This reduction in capacity could contribute to a reduction in LOS on local streets, which may temporarily impact access to certain businesses, residences, and SARTC within and adjacent to the construction limits; in order to determine the effect of this temporary reduction in capacity, a roadway segment analysis was conducted for Santa Ana Boulevard. The results of the study are summarized in the following section.

Santa Ana Boulevard Capacity Analysis
The segment along Santa Ana Boulevard (from Santiago Street to west of I-5) was selected to identify potential impacts due to a reduction in capacity during construction. The first phase of construction involves shifting Santa Ana Boulevard south of its current alignment between Santiago Street and Fuller Street-Fruit Street. During this phase, four travel lanes (two in each direction) would be provided, thereby reducing the existing capacity by two lanes (from a sixlane cross-section) for a duration of approximately 12 months.

The second and final phase of construction would require complete closure of the eastbound direction of Santa Ana Boulevard. Eastbound traffic would be detoured south of the existing Santa Ana Boulevard alignment and connect to Fruit Street via a temporary two-lane roadway between Santiago Street and Fruit Street. Two westbound travel lanes will also be maintained.

This second phase would occur over a three-month span. Under each phase of construction, four travel lanes will be maintained (two lanes on Santa Ana Boulevard and two lanes on Fruit Street). As shown in the Table 24 below, a reduction from six lanes to four lanes during construction of the proposed project would not impact operations of Santa Ana Boulevard.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2806 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-7
Table 24. Santa Ana Boulevard Roadway Segment Analysis
Roadway From To
Opening Year (2016)
Average Daily Traffic
(ADT)1 # ofLanes
LOS E
Capacity2 LOS3
Opening Year (2016)
Santa Ana Blvd Santiago Street I-5 Freeway 20,093 6 56,300 A Opening Year (2016) During Construction (Reduction of Two Travel Lanes) Santa Ana Blvd AWSC 11.4 B 12.3 B 1 Opening Year ADT referenced from existing ADT from Transit Zoning Code EIR Traffic Study, grown to year 2016 2 LOS E Capacity referenced from City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element 3 LOS determined by assigning a letter grade based on the numerical value of the volume-to-capacity ratio.

Alternative Route Capacity Analysis
Since the traffic analysis indicates that the detour route would have adequate capacity to accommodate the demand, it is not anticipated that a substantial number of vehicles would shift to alternative routes. However, some vehicles may shift to upstream and downstream ramps along I-5 to avoid the construction area, it may be advantageous from a construction phasing perspective to encourage the use of alternative routes. As such, an additional roadway segment analysis along the potential alternative routes (17th Street, 4th Street, Grand Avenue, Penn Way) was conducted to confirm that these alternative facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate any overflow from Santa Ana Boulevard. 4th Street and 17th Street represent parallel facilities that eastbound and westbound traffic could utilize instead of Santa Ana Boulevard. Grand Avenue and Penn Way have ramp locations north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard that traffic could utilize during construction. The alternative route roadway segment analysis is summarized in the Table 25 below.

Table 25. Alternative Route Roadway Segment Analysis
Roadway From To
Opening Year (2016)
Average Daily Traffic
(ADT)1 # ofLanes
LOS E
Capacity2 LOS3
Opening Year (2016) During Construction (Reduction of Two Travel Lanes) 17th St I-5 NB Ramps West of I-5 NB
Ramps
46,062 6 56,300 D
17th St I-5 NB Ramps East of I-5 NB
Ramps
36,578 6 56,300 B
4th St Grand Ave Santiago St 18,243 4 56,300 A
4th St Grand Ave I-5 SB Ramp 20,683 4 37,500 A
Grand Ave 4th St Santa Ana Blvd 37,650 4 37,500 F
Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd 17th St 32,200 4 37,500 D
Penn Way I-5 SB Ramps 17th St 14,490 4 37,500 A
Penn Way I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd 8,280 2 12,500 B
1 Opening Year ADT referenced from existing ADT from Transit Zoning Code EIR Traffic Study, grown to year 2016 2 LOS E Capacity referenced from City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element 3 LOS determined by assigning a letter grade based on the numerical value of the volume-to-capacity ratio.

Bold denotes roadway segment operating at unacceptable LOS.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2807 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-8
As shown in Table 25, all potential alternative routes have adequate capacity to handle any overflow due to construction on Santa Ana Boulevard, with the exception of Grand Avenue from 4th Street to Santa Ana Boulevard. Appropriate notice and signage would be provided so as to discourage any traffic diversion to this location. Grand Avenue does not represent a primary alternative route as it is anticipated that vehicles would exit at either 17th Street or 1st to 4th Street to avoid Santa Ana Boulevard.

During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I-5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment; therefore, no disruption to rail transit is anticipated.

The approved Traffic/Circulation Study has concluded that a reduction in capacity along Santa Ana Boulevard during the construction period would not cause any traffic impacts on Santa Ana Boulevard during the construction period and that the roadways surrounding the project area would be able to accommodate a shift in traffic during the construction period. Implementation of a TMP (Measure TRF-1) (refer to Section 4.3) that informs the community about project construction activities and maintains access to and from the project area during construction is expected to satisfactorily avoid or minimize potentially adverse effects to Caltrans Facilities and the local street system. Once construction is complete, access is expected to better than present.

Long-Term (Operation)
The project proposes to grade-separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink atgrade crossing between Logan Street and Fuller Street. The associated project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the I-5 southbound off-ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation, the proposed project includes the following improvements:
• Termination of Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard via construction of a cul-desac; and, • Restriping of Fuller Street both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard to provide one shared through-left and one exclusive right turn lane (de facto right turn lane) while maintaining the unsignalized traffic control.

The project also proposes a minor reconfiguration of the Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection, but would not affect traffic operations or capacity. However, due to the proposed termination of Logan Street as part of the project, traffic would be diverted to alternate routes, as described below. No other reassignments or rerouting of vehicular traffic would be required with the project, and the grade separation itself is not anticipated to increase traffic demand along Santa Ana Boulevard.

With the termination of Logan Street with the project, vehicles making a westbound right turn from Santa Ana Boulevard to Logan Street and a southbound right turn from Logan Street to Santa Ana Boulevard would need to be diverted to alternative routes. As no connections to EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2808 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-9
Logan Street and the adjacent roadways are available from farther east on Santa Ana Boulevard (due to the presence of the railroad right-of-way), all vehicular access would be via Santiago Street. Therefore, vehicles previously making a right turn into Logan Street from Santa Ana Boulevard would need to reroute to make a westbound right turn at Santiago Street, followed by a northbound right turn at Civic Center Drive to arrive at their destinations at or near Logan Street. Vehicles previously making a southbound right turn from Logan Street to Santa Ana Boulevard would need to reroute to head north on Logan Street to westbound Stafford StreetCivic Center Drive, then either north or south on Santiago Street to reach their destinations.

As part of the Traffic/Circulation Study, a level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate existing intersection operating conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the proposed project. Traffic operations were evaluated for each of the following scenarios during the peak hour of the weekday AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods:
• Existing (2011)
• Existing (2011) plus Project
• Opening Year (2016)
• Opening Year (2016) plus Project
• Future Year (2035)
• Future Year (2035) plus Project
As shown in Table 26, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS under Opening Year (2016) or Future Year (2035) conditions with addition of the project with the exception of:
• Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: Continues to operate at LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours
However, this location would operate at LOS F without the project; as such, the additional delay (less than the one percent threshold of significance) with the project would not constitute a substantial impact. This location does not meet the signal warrant criteria under Opening Year (2016) or Future Year (2035) conditions. Since the project would not add any traffic to the minor street approach (Fuller Street), a traffic signal would still not be warranted under Opening Year (2016) or Future Year (2035) plus project conditions.

Access to the SARTC train station and the Fuller Street-Fruit Street/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection would not be affected by the addition of the project to Opening Year (2016) or Future Year (2035) conditions.

The proposed project would provide a net benefit by reducing the congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard caused by daily OCTA Metrolink train crossings by removing the existing at-grade conflict between vehicular traffic and rail traffic. Traffic diversions due to the termination of Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard would not cause an appreciable delay at any of the study area intersections.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2809 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-10
Table 26. Existing and Projected Intersection LOS
Intersection
Traffic
Control
Existing
(2011) LOS
Existing (2011) +
Project LOS
Opening Year
(2016)
Opening Year
(2016) + Project
Future Year
(2035)
Future Year
(2035) + Project
AM
Peak
PM
Peak AM Peak
PM
Peak
AM
Peak
PM
Peak
AM
Peak
PM
Peak
AM
Peak
PM
Peak
AM
Peak
PM
Peak
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal A A A A A A A B C C C C Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd. Signal C C C C C C C C A B A B Santiago St/Civic Center Dr. AWSC B B B B B B B B A B A B Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC B B --1 --1 B A --1 --1 B B --1 --1 SARTC Driveway/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC A B A B A B A B A B A B Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC F F F F F F F F F F F F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal C C C C C C C C C C C C Notes: AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; 1 Intersection would be closed as part of the project Bold denotes unacceptable LOS.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2810 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-11
The proposed project would provide a safer railroad crossing, better local circulation, and improved safety for vehicles and pedestrians utilizing pedestrian bridge crossing, and throughtraffic safety would be expected to improve. As such, while the proposed project would produce noticeable changes in local roadway circulation, impacts would be considered beneficial.

4.2.1.2 Access, Circulation, and Parking
Short-term (Construction)
During the construction period, area residents and businesses near the construction zone may occasionally experience some inconvenience due to construction equipment, traffic lane closures, detours, or parking restrictions. During construction, motorists and pedestrians along Santa Ana Boulevard would experience some delays and detouring. Access to all businesses and residences within and adjacent to the study area would be maintained by way of alternative local streets as described below. The Traffic/Circulation Study prepared for the project determined that there would not be any adverse short-term access and circulation impacts. Refer to the discussion above in “Caltrans Facilities and the Local Street System.” As mentioned previously, a four-lane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard would be required during the first two phases of construction. This detour road would bisect the existing SARTC parking lot resulting in the removal of approximately 102 spaces for an approximate 18- month period. Impacts from the loss of parking are not anticipated since the existing parking structure at the SARTC station is currently underutilized and would be able to provide enough parking during the 18-month construction period. No street parking impacts are anticipated along Santa Ana Boulevard, since parking is currently not allowed on this street. Street parking may be restricted during construction of the proposed improvements on Fuller Street and Logan Street; however, there are other local nearby streets where parking is available. In addition, impacts would only be temporary. No adverse effects are anticipated.

Long-Term (Operation)
Long-term access and circulation impacts would be identical to those described above under Caltrans Facilities and the Local Street System.

The parking at all of the displaced businesses would be removed; however, this parking is for the property where the use would be removed. Therefore, the parking would no longer be required.

The project would also result in the loss of approximately 28 parking spaces at APN 398-208-01, which is the location of the Orange County Public Works, Facilities Operations Division. The project would also reconfigure the existing street parking provided on Fuller Street and Fruit Street. This would provide for approximately 90 new spaces. Additional parking is also provided in the other Orange County Public Works parking lots located south of Fruit Street.

The loss of parking is not anticipated to result in adverse effects. The loss of 28 spaces is not anticipated to result in long-term parking impacts since the project would provide for 90 new parking spaces.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2811 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-12
The proposed project would provide a safer railroad crossing, better local circulation, and improved safety for vehicles and pedestrians utilizing the pedestrian bridge crossing, and through-traffic safety would be expected to improve.

4.2.1.3 Public Transportation
Short-term (Construction)
The bus stops along Santa Ana Boulevard would either be relocated during and/or after the completion of the project’s construction or may be affected by an increase in traffic along the street as a result of construction detours or diversion of traffic due to project improvements. This would result in temporary inconveniences to bus riders during the construction period. During the construction period, bus riders could experience disruptions and inconveniences by closures of Logan Street and detour along Santa Ana Boulevard. The TMP that would be prepared for the project would include a Public Awareness Campaign that would inform the public about construction activities, bus stop closures and relocations, and detours or roadway closures.

During construction, the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service. In addition, the project would include the construction of two temporary platforms, both of which would be approximately 680 feet long; therefore, no adverse effects to rail service are anticipated.

Long-term (Operation)
Train and Crossing Delay and Safety Analysis
This section of the report presents the grade crossing blockage time, delay, and safety analysis for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing under existing (2011), Opening Year (2016), and Future Year (2035) no project conditions. Since the project eliminates the at-grade crossing, the analysis is not performed under “With Project” conditions.

Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay: Grade crossing blockage time and delay was determined based on a maximum of 10 trains per hour during each of the peak hours, 66 trains per day, and a train speed of 66 feet per second (fps), or 45 mph. Under the existing 2011 conditions, the highest existing peak hour delay occurs during the PM peak hour where the delay is approximately 19 seconds per vehicle during the peak hour (0.32 minute/vehicle = 19 seconds per vehicle). On average, there would be an approximately 6-second delay per vehicle during a 24-hour period. Refer to Table 27 below.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2812 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-13
Table 27. Existing (2011) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis Train Frequency
Daily Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
AM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
PM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
Existing 2011
66 trains per day 0.10 -- --
8/10 (AM/PM) trains per hour -- 0.28 0.32
Opening Year 2016
71 trains per day 0.13 -- --
8/10 (AM/PM) trains per hour -- 0.34 0.41
Future Year 2035
105 trains per day 0.20 0.20
8/10 (AM/PM) trains 0.43 0.48
Under the Opening Year 2016 conditions, the highest existing peak hour delay occurs during the PM peak hour where the delay is approximately 25 seconds per vehicle during the peak hour (0.41 minute/vehicle = 25 seconds per vehicle). On average, there would be an approximately eight-second delay per vehicle during a 24-hour period. Under the Future Year 2035 conditions, the highest existing peak hour delay occurs during the PM peak hour, where the delay is approximately 29 seconds per vehicle (0.48 minute/vehicle = 29 seconds per vehicle). On average, there would be approximately 12 seconds delay per vehicle during a 24-hour period.

Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety: A hazard index ranks crossings in relative terms: the higher the calculated index, the more hazardous the crossing (FHWA 2014). A hazard index of 142 was determined for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing under existing conditions (2011), based on 66 trains per day and an arterial roadway segment ADT volume of 19,607. The Opening Year (2016) hazard index was determined to be 157 for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing, based on 71 trains per day and an arterial roadway segment ADT volume of 20,092.

The Future Year (2035) hazard index was determined to be 357 was determined for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing, based on 105 trains per day and an arterial roadway segment ADT volume of 30,916.

As shown in Table 27, without the proposed grade separation, the delays and queues caused by train operations would continue to increase in the future. The proposed project would provide a net benefit by reducing the congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard caused by daily OCTA Metrolink train crossings by removing the existing at-grade conflict between vehicular traffic and rail traffic. The evaluation of rail-highway delay and safety substantiated the overall benefit and need of the proposed project. No long-term impacts on transit services are anticipated.

4.2.1.4 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Short-term Operation
During the construction period, some bicyclists and pedestrians could experience disruptions and inconveniences by closures of Logan Street and detour along Santa Ana Boulevard. No impacts on bicycle facilities are anticipated along Santa Ana Boulevard since there are currently no bike EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2813 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-14
lanes on this street. Project construction activities would not affect the existing bike lanes on Santiago Street or 4th Street.

During construction of the Santa Ana Boulevard detour road, pedestrians would be able use the sidewalk along Santa Ana Boulevard and once the detour road is constructed, pedestrians would be able to travel on the detour road’s sidewalk. In additional a temporary detour road would be available north of Santa Ana Street which would provide access to Washington Avenue and Fuller Street. No adverse effects are anticipated since there are several alternative access routes in the surrounding neighborhoods and the detour routes could be used by pedestrians or students.

Implementation of the TMP (Measure TRF-1) would minimize impacts related to circulation and access during the construction period. Traffic and pedestrian detour routes would be provided to ensure that all businesses and residences are accessible during construction in the event of a temporary closure of traffic lanes or a pedestrian walkway is required.

Long-term (Operation)
Two pedestrian bridges are proposed: one on each side of the proposed railroad bridge. The proposed pedestrian bridges would allow connectivity of the residential neighborhood west of the railroad and potential mixed-use developments east of the railroad bridge with SARTC. The exact bridge type and configuration will be determined during the final design phase of the project. In addition to a new pedestrian bridge, an approximately 42-foot corridor is being reserved along the southerly portion of Santa Ana Boulevard for a future bikeway and the streetcar right-of-way proposed under the Santa Ana-Garden Grove Fixed Guideway project.

The pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Santa Ana Boulevard and Santiago Street, which is the primary pedestrian access across Santa Ana Boulevard, would remain as part of the proposed project. Upon completion, the proposed project would result in improved access, safety, and circulation for bicyclist and pedestrians, as it would reduce traffic delays and hazards along Santa Ana Boulevard.

Cumulative
Other construction projects in the area may be under construction in the same time frame as the proposed project. To the extent that construction periods overlap, there is a potential for cumulative local level traffic impacts from multiple project detours and lane reductions occurring simultaneously in and adjacent to the study area, potentially resulting in deterioration of traffic operations on area local roadways. The City would coordinate the timing of project detours and lane closures for all projects in the area in order to minimize cumulative traffic impacts. With the minimization measures identified below, the proposed project would have no adverse effects on traffic and transportation/ pedestrian and bicycle facilities; therefore, the project would not contribute either directly or indirectly to a cumulatively considerable impact on this resource area.

The traffic analysis for the proposed project is based on future traffic conditions in the year 2016 and 2035, which accounts for future development in the project area and an ambient annual growth rate of 0.5 percent per year. As a result, this traffic analysis constitutes the operational cumulative analysis for the project. According to the traffic analysis, the study area intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the exception of Fuller EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2814 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-15
Street/Santa Ana Boulevard, which would operate at LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours.

However, this intersection currently operations at unacceptable conditions. The proposed project in conjunction with other planned projects is not anticipated to contribute to cumulative impacts that affect mobility in the project study area.

4.3 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures
In order to minimize traffic impacts during the construction period, the following avoidance and minimization measure shall be implemented as part of the proposed project.

TRF-1: Prepare and implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP). The TMP will be provided to emergency service providers and school officials with construction plans prior to commencement of construction. The following shall be included in the TMP or carried out in coordination with the TMP:
• Implement a construction management program that maintains access to and from the project area community through signage, detours, flagmen, etc. • Coordinate with emergency services providers to ensure that alternative response routes to and from the project area community are in place during construction of the proposed project.
• Provide access to all fire hydrants along all access routes and provide and maintain fire department vehicle access roads along project site. • Consult with local school officials to identify safe vehicular routes and pedestrian crossing for students traveling to and from schools in the project area community during construction of the proposed project. • Coordinate with the utility providers for relocation of utility lines and inform the utility users in advance about the date and timings of service disruptions. • Prepare temporary detour plans during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) phase.

Provide notification to be sent to emergency service providers, local school officials, and any residents that may be substantially affected by any street closures (including partial and/or full closures) or traffic diversions at least two weeks in advance of the planned closure or diversion.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2815 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
4-16
This page left intentionally blank
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2816 5/5/2026
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
5-1
Chapter 5 Public Involvement
A brief presentation of the project was made to the Santa Ana City Council on November 28, 2011. The presentation included a brief overview of the project, the proposed project schedule, and potential dates for future public outreach meetings.

A public information meeting was held on December 18, 2013 from 6:00 to 8:30 PM at SARTC at 1000 East Santa Ana Boulevard, in the City of Santa Ana. Prior to the public information meeting, a public notice (available in both English and Spanish) announcing the meeting was mailed to all owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site. The public notice was also posted on the City’s website.

The public information meeting allowed visitors to learn more about the proposed project, discuss the proposed project design, review the technical studies prepared for the project, and discuss how the proposed project may affect them or their property. A presentation was made that included an overview of the project, the proposed project schedule and status, potential right-of-way impacts, and environmental studies completed to date, and ended with a “Question and Answer” session. Following the presentation, project team members met with visitors and answered any additional questions raised by the public. Present at the meeting were the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency, OCTA, Caltrans, AECOM, and ICF International, along with a number of property owners. Approximately 40 visitors attended the meeting. The public expressed the following concerns and questions at the meeting:
• The City should implement a “quiet zones” at rail crossing during the construction period.
• What were the other design options that were considered for the project? • What are the project costs and what funding has been secured? • What is the project timing and what is the duration of construction period? • Where will people park if a portion of the parking lot at the train station will be removed for construction of the detour road?
• Will the project generate additional traffic on Santa Ana Boulevard? Will the project increase the capacity of Santa Ana Boulevard?
• The City should widen Santa Ana Boulevard west of Santiago Boulevard to the City’s Civic Center.
• How would the project integrate with the Street Car Project and SARTC Expansion Project?
• Appreciation that Santa Ana Boulevard will remain open during construction. • Residents at the Santiago Lofts expressed concern over the lack of parking at the Santiago Lofts for their guests. They usually need to park at the train station. If parking is removed at the train station, they will lose parking spaces for their guests. • Where would the street cars run along Santa Ana Boulevard? EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2817 5/5/2026
Chapter 5. Public Involvement
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
5-2
• Residents from the Logan neighborhood also expressed concerns over people using the SARTC station parking in their neighborhood.

One comment card was submitted requesting copies of the Community Impact Assessment, Traffic Study, Noise Study Report, and Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Site Assessments.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2818 5/5/2026
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
A-1
Appendix A Relocation Impact Memo
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2819 5/5/2026
Appendix A. Relocation Impact Memo
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
A-2
This page left intentionally blank
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2820 5/5/2026
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ∙ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT DRAFT RELOCATION IMPACT MEMORANDUM 10-EX-3 (REV 12/2005) (Form #)
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency Department of Transportation

M e m o r a n d u m
To: REGION/DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGER Date: July 27, 2012

REGION/DISTRICT PROJECT ENGINEER
REGION/DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH CHIEF File: District 12 Orange County
STPL 5063(136)
From: Department of Transportation – District 12
Right of Way Relocation Assistance
Subject: Draft Relocation Impact Memorandum
It has been determined there is no significant impact to owners, tenants, businesses or persons in possession of real property to be acquired who would qualify for relocation assistance benefits or entitlements under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Act of 1970.

The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink atgrade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Figures 1 and 2).

Currently, 66 trains cross Santa Ana Boulevard at this location on weekdays. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at-grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation, including depressing the profile of Santa Ana Boulevard under the adjacent Metrolink tracks in order to enhance traffic operations, improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety, improve emergency response times, and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard.

The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound off-ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard (see Figure 3).

The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two-track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I-5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located immediately to the east of the existing railroad alignment.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2821 5/5/2026
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ∙ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT DRAFT RELOCATION IMPACT MEMORANDUM 10-EX-3 (REV 12/2005) (Form #)
The project also proposes to construct a two-lane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard, which would be used by vehicular traffic during the construction of the underpass bridge and its approaches, and to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right-of-way, including both permanent acquisition and temporary easements, would be needed for the construction of the shoofly alignment and detour road.

A field review of the proposed project was conducted to determine the potential impact on the residential and nonresidential units. No residential properties would be displaced by the project.

The project would affect 20 distinct nonresidential properties (refer to Figure 3). Of these, nine nonresidential properties (composed of 12 parcels) would be fully acquired and would result in displacement requiring relocation (refer to Table 1). An additional two nonresidential properties (APN 398-101-15 and 398-101-16) would be partially acquired (sliver takes) and would require some property reconfiguration but would not result in displacement. Eight properties, including portions of two of the partially acquired properties mentioned previously, would require a temporary construction easement (refer to Table 2).

Based on real estate listings and the professional opinions of two local commercial real estate agents, there appears to be a sufficient supply of adequate sites to relocate all of the displacees within the immediate vicinity of the City of Santa Ana. Given the availability of suitable properties in the immediate vicinity of the project, displacement and relocation of businesses would not result in substantial hardship. Relocation assistance benefits or entitlements would be provided to displacees in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Act of 1970, as amended.

Table 1. Description of Nonresidential Properties to Be Relocated (Full Acquisition) No. APN
Building
Size
(square
feet)
Owner/
Tennant
Inhabited
Property Type
(Existing Use)
Assessed
value
as of 2011
(in $)
Number of
Employees
1 398-093-03 12,500 Tenant Industrial
(automotive parts) $463,630 1
2 398-093-04
398-093-05 5,000 Tenant Industrial (textile
manufacturing) $9,371 4
3 398-093-06 5,000 Tenant Industrial (funeral
services) $372,424 4
4 398-093-07 5,000
Appears
vacant;
although
may be
occupied
by
Gulledge
Machine
Works
Industrial (vacant) $55,972 5-10
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2822 5/5/2026
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ∙ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT DRAFT RELOCATION IMPACT MEMORANDUM 10-EX-3 (REV 12/2005) (Form #)
No. APN
Building
Size
(square
feet)
Owner/
Tennant
Inhabited
Property Type
(Existing Use)
Assessed
value
as of 2011
(in $)
Number of
Employees
5 398-092-02 8,500 2 Tenants
Commercial
(optometry clinic
and textile
marketing and
design)
$1,289,638 NA1
6 398-093-13
398-093-08
2 buildings:
7,200 &
5,400
Tenant
and vacant
Industrial (office
supply
distribution and
vacant)
$1,539,730
NA1
7 931-104-67
931-104-68
(formerly
398-342-18)
2 buildings:
44,000 &
8,500
Tenant
Industrial
(geotechnical
engineering)
$4,300,000 13
8 398-207-01
Multiple,
totaling
5,750
Owner Government
(vehicle storage) $192,689 NA1
9 398-208-01 None Owner Government
(vehicle storage) Unknown 0
Sources: Loopnet.com Property Records (January 2012), and Field Survey (January 2012), AECOM 2012; Cortera Inc, 2012. 1 NA= Not Available. 2010 U.S. Census did not provide employment data for these properties. Chapter 10 of the Caltrans Right-ofWay manual states, “Draft reports do not need an exact count of the number of persons being displaced.” (pg. 10.02-4) Table 2. Partial Acquisitions and Temporary Construction Easement Locations Not Requiring Relocation
Assessor Parcel
Number (APN) Owner Name
TCE Square
Footage
Required
Partial
Acquisition Area
(square feet)
398-092-13 County of Orange 6,953 --
398-093-01 Santa Ana Industrial Co. 655 --
398-101-15 Phoenix Houses of
California, Inc. 2,604 1,169
398-101-16 County of Orange 11,500 14,453
398-361-07 County of Orange 38,074 --
398-361-12 Batool Japalaghi 14,828 --
Source: AECOM 2012
Any person (individual, family, corporation, partnership, or association) who moves from real property or moves personal property from real property as a result of the acquisition of the real property, or required to relocate as a result of a written notice from the City of Santa Ana from the real property required for a transportation project is eligible for “Relocation Assistance.” All EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2823 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2824 5/5/2026
§¨¦5
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
§¨¦405
UV55
UV91
UV261
UV73
UV57
UV72
UV22
UV133
UV90
UV133
UV90
UV261
UV UV72 91
UV261
UV57
UV22
Anaheim
Santa Ana
Irvine
Orange
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Fullerton
Tustin
Fountain Valley
Newport Beach
Westminster
Tustin Foothills
Placentia
Villa Park Villa Park
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
±
Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
San Bernardino
Riverside
Imperial San Diego
Orange
Los Angeles
Kern
P a c i f i c
O c e a n
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig01_Regional_Vicinity.mxd SM, NB (09-19-11) Project Site
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2825 5/5/2026
Project Location
French
Park
Logan
Park
Mabury
Park
Prentice
Park
P E Railroad
BNSF RR and Amtrak
15Th
Mcclay
Standard
Spurgeon
Elk
Oakmont
Santiago
Main
Parrie
Hardly
Grace
Breeden
Trinidad
Kilson
Obarr
8Th
6Th
Brown
Dresser
Myrtle
Mortimer
Martha
Greenwood
5Th
Penn
Eastside
Porter
11Th
Stafford
12Th
Terminal
Eastwood
Patricia
2Nd
Camile
Court
Hathaway
Dorman
9Th
10Th
Valencia
Palm
Vance
Minnie
18Th
Warren
Cedar
Concord
Custer
Wellington
Fuller
Fruit
Fairmont
19Th
Bush
20Th
21St
Catalina
Logan
16Th
3Rd
Santa Fe
Minter
Garfield Hickory
Civic Center
Bishop
Pine
Lacy
Washington
Chestnut
Walnut
Wright
French
Linwood
Poinsettia
Lyon
Orange
Cypress
Halladay
Oak
14Th
Maple
4Th
Lincoln
Mabury
Santa Ana
17Th
Grand
Mortimer
5Th
4Th
Main
1St
§¨¦5
Figure 2
Project Location Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig02_Project_Location.mxd SM, NB (09-19-11)) ±
Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2826 5/5/2026

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

METROLINK

SANTA ANA

STATION

STAFFORD ST

CUSTER ST

LOGAN ST

WASHINGTON AVE

LINCOLN AVE

FULLER ST

TERMINAL ST
E 4TH STBREEDEN
I-5 NB
I-5 SB
I-5 SB OFF
I-5 SB ON

PHOENIX HOUSE

REHAB CENTER

FRUIT ST

EASTWOOD AVE

SANTA ANA
BLVD

GRAND AVE
APN
398-093-01 APN 398-194-21
APN
398-194-22
APN
398-194-20
APN
398-194-19
APN
398-194-18
APN
398-092-09
APN
398-092-08
APN
398-092-10
APN
398-092-11
APN
398-092-14
APN
398-092-13
APN
398-092-02
APN
398-093-08
APN
398-093-07
APN
398-093-05
398-093-06
APN
398-093-04
APN
398-194-15
APN
398-194-16
APN
398-194-17
APN
398-194-23
APN
398-194-14
APN
398-093-13
398-205
-07
APN
398-202-01
APN
398-201-11
APN
398-352-10
APN
398-204-04
APN
398-352-07
APN
398-207-01
APN
398-361-07
APN
398-208-01
APN
398-101-16
APN
398-101-15
APN
398-101-14 APN
398-101-13
APN
398-101-02
APN
398-361-01
APN
398-352-06
APN
398-342-12
APN
398-381-01
APN
398-381-04
APN
398-381-02
05 03
04 02
APN
398-381-12
APN
398-461-07
APN
398-461-19
APN
398-461-18
APN
398-361-03
APN
398-361-12
APN
398-093-03
APN
398-202-07
APN
398-202-08
APN
398-202-09
APN
398-202
-10
APN
398-205-01
APN
398-205-02
APN
398-205-03
APN
398-205-04
APN
398-205
-05
APN
398-205-09
APN
398-205-08
APN
398-381-03
APN
398-381-=13
APN
398-362
-01
APN
398-092-15
APN
398-092-12
APN
398-093-02
APN
398-342-18
Figure 3
Proposed Project Area
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
±
Source: ESRI World Imagery
(2010)
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig03_Project_Area.mxd Date: 5/8/2012 26629 Legend
Parcels
Limits of Disturbance
Proposed Full Aquisition
Proposed Partial Aquisition
Temporary Construction Easement
Proposed Improvements
Detour Road
Proposed Temporary Shoofly
District: 12
County: Orange
Route Santa Ana Blvd
Federal Project No: STPL 5063 (136)
0 100 200 50
Feet
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2827 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2 City Council 22 – 2828 5/5/2026
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
B-1
Appendix B References Used and Contacts
Printed References
AECOM. 2014. Right of Way Acquisition and Utility Data. Updated February 2014.

AECOM. 2011. Initial Site Assessment for the Santa Ana Boulevard/Metrolink Railroad Grade Separation Project, Santa Ana, California. Prepared by AECOM for the City of Santa Ana. September 2011.

AECOM. 2012. Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project Final Traffic/Circulation Study.

Prepared by AECOM for the City of Santa Ana. May 18, 2012.

AECOM. 2013a. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Santa Ana Boulevard/Metrolink Grade Separation Project, South Area Santa Ana, California 92701. Prepared by AECOM for the City of Santa Ana. June 28, 2013.

AECOM. 2013b. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Santa Ana Boulevard/Metrolink Grade Separation Project, North Area Santa Ana, California 92701. Prepared by AECOM for the City of Santa Ana. June 25, 2013.

AECOM. 2013c. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Santa Ana Boulevard/Metrolink Grade Separation Project, County of Orange – Fruit Street Shops 1111 and 1143 E. Fruit Street Santa Ana, California 92701. Prepared by AECOM for the City of Santa Ana.

April 29, 2013.

California Department of Conservation. 2010. Orange County Important Farmland 2010, Map Sheet 2 of 3. Division of Land Resource Protection. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Available: < ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2010/ora10.pdf >.

Accessed: January 6, 2012.

California Department of Transportation. 2011. Standard Environmental Reference Environmental Handbook Volume 4 – Community Impact Assessment. October 2011.

California EDD. 2014. Monthly :Labor Force Data for Cities and Designated Places, December 2013, Preliminary Data Not Adjusted. Available:
<http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/Content.asp?pageid=1006>. Accessed:

February 27, 2014.

City of Santa Ana. 2007. Santa Ana Renaissance Specific Plan. Draft October 2007.

City of Santa Ana. 2008. City of Santa Bicycle Routes Map. Available: <http://www.ci.santaana.ca.us/pwa/documents/bikeroutemap.pdf/>. Accessed: February 16, 2012.

City of Santa Ana. 2009. General Plan Draft Housing Element 2006–2014. October 2009.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2829 5/5/2026
Appendix B. References Used and Contacts
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
B-2
City of Santa Ana. 2010. City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Draft Environmental Impact Report. Prepared February 2010 by PBS&J for the City of Santa Ana. Available: <http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/pba/planning/draft_eir.asp/>. Accessed:

January 10, 2012.

City of Santa Ana. 2011. Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency. Available:
<http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/parks/parks.asp. />. Accessed: December 6, 2011.

City of Santa Ana. 2011a. Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC). Available:
<http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/sartc/>. Accessed: January 10, 2012.

City of Santa Ana. 2011b. the Met at South Coast Multi-Family Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Prepared for the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency. Prepared by ICF International. November 2011.

City of Santa Ana. 2011c. Budget Stabilization Study. August 2011. Available online at http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/documents/20110919_management_partners_report.pdf.

Accessed November 2011.

City of Santa Ana website. 2011d. Santa Ana’s Budget: Tough Times, Tough Decisions.

Available online at http://www.santa-ana.org/. Accessed November 2011.

City of Santa Ana. 2012. AB987 Affordable Housing List. Revision Date 10/1/2012.

Available: < http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/cda/documents/2102_001.pdf />. Accessed:

February 27, 2014.

City of Santa Ana. 2014a. Major Planning Project and Environmental Documents. Available:
<http://www.santa-ana.org/pba/planning/default.asp>. Accessed: February 25, 2014.

City of Santa Ana. 2014b. Major Development Activity Report, Last Updated January 2014.

Available: <http://www.santaana.org/pba/planning/documents/DevelopmentActivityReportLastupdatedDecember2013.pdf>. Accessed: February 25, 2014.

City of Santa Ana. 2014c. Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency. Available:
<http://www.santa-ana.org/parks/location/>. Accessed: February 26, 2014.

City of Santa Ana Finance and Management Service Agency. 2013. The 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013. Available <http://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/finance/cafr/>. Accessed: February 27, 2014.

City of Santa Ana City Council Meeting. 2011. FY 2011–2012 Budget Discussion. City Council Meeting June 6, 2011.

County of Orange Auditor-Controller. 2013. County of Orange Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2013. Available:

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2830 5/5/2026
Appendix B. References Used and Contacts
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
B-3
<http://ac.ocgov.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=33067/>. Accessed:

February 27, 2014.

County of Orange. 2011. County of Orange General Plan, Chapter II, Background for Planning.

Updated March 2011.

Federal Highway Administration. 2014. Assessment of Crossing Safety and Operation.

Available: <http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/xings/com_roaduser/07010/sec03.htm>. Accessed:

January 30, 2014.

French Park Care Center. 2012. About Us. Available: <
http://www.frenchparkcarecenter.com/about.html/>. Accessed: February 14, 2012.

ICF International. 2012a. Draft Air Quality Assessment Report for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project. Prepared for the City of Santa Ana by ICF International.

ICF International. 2012b. Draft Visual Impact Assessment Report for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project. Prepared for the City of Santa Ana by ICF International.

ICF International. 2013. Draft Noise Study Report for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project. Prepared for the City of Santa Ana by ICF International.

Latino Health Access. 2011. Barrio Logan Empowerment Committee. Available: < http://latinohealthaccess.net/programs/policy-advocacy/barrio-logan/>. Accessed: January 14, 2012.

News Santa Ana. 2010. City of Santa Ana settles lawsuit over demolition of home in the Lacy neighborhood. Available: <http://newsantaana.com/2010/04/19/city-of-santa-ana-settleslawsuit-over-demolition-of-homes-in-the-lacy-neighborhood. Accessed: February 14, 2012.

News Santa Ana. 2010. City of Santa Ana settles lawsuit over demolition of homes in the Lacy neighborhood Available: < http://newsantaana.com/2010/04/19/city-of-santa-ana-settleslawsuit-over-demolition-of-homes-in-the-lacy-neighborhood/>. Accessed: February 17, 2012.

Santa Ana Unified School District. 2014. 2012-13 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2013-14 School Year. Available: < http://www.sausd.us/Page/25836 />.

Accessed: March 1, 2014.

State of California. 2013. Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2011–2013. Sacramento, California, May.

Trulia 2012a. Logan Real Estate Overview. Available: <http:// www.trulia.com/real_estate/Santa_Ana-California >. Accessed: February 17, 2012.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2831 5/5/2026
Appendix B. References Used and Contacts
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
B-4
Trulia 2012b. Logan Real Estate Overview. Available:
<http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Logan-Santa_Ana/8055//>. Accessed: February 16, 2012.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010a. Census Summary File 1, Tables H3, H4, H5, and HCT1. General Housing Characteristics: 2010 2010 Census Summary File 1.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010b. Employment Status by Sex: 2000 Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010c. Race Alone or in Combination, Summary File 1 (2010).

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010d. Hispanic or Latino, and Not Hispanic or Latino by Race.

Compiled by ICF 2012.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010e. Universe: Total population 2010 Census Summary File 1.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010f. Census of Population and Housing, Occupancy Status Summary File 1 (2010); Households and Families: 2010. 2010 Census Summary File 1.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010g. 2010 Census. Tenure, Household Size, and Age of Householder:
2010. Summary File 1, Tables H4, H16, and H17.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2010h. 2006-2010 American Community Survey. Means of Transportation to Work: Universe: Workers 16 years and over.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. 2008–2012 American Community Survey. Selected Housing Characteristics: 2008–2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Available:
<http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?fpt=table > Accessed: February 28, 2014.

Western Medical Center. 2012. Welcome to Western Medical Center Santa Ana. Available: < http://www.westernmedicalcenter.com/default/>. Accessed: January 10, 2012.

Personal Communication
Dixon, Janet. Administrative Personnel. Durham School Services. July 21, 2009—telephone conversation.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2832 5/5/2026
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
C-1
Appendix C Summary of Relocation Benefits
For guidance, refer to Appendix C in the Caltrans Environmental Handbook Volume 4.

California Dept. of Transportation Relocation Assistance Program Relocation Assistance Advisory Services
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) would provide relocation advisory assistance to any person, business, farm, or non-profit organization displaced as a result of Caltrans’ acquisition of real property for public use. Caltrans would assist residential displacees in obtaining comparable decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing by providing current and continuing information on sales prices and rental rates of available housing. Non-residential displacees would receive information on comparable properties for lease or purchase.

Residential replacement dwellings would be in equal or better neighborhoods, at prices within the financial means of the individuals and families displaced, and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. Before any displacement occurs, displacees would be offered comparable replacement dwellings that are open to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and are consistent with the requirements of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. This assistance would also include supplying information concerning federal- and stateassisted housing programs, and any other known services being offered by public and private agencies in the area.

Residential Relocation Payments Program
For more information or a brochure on the residential relocation program, please contact [insert environmental planner’s name] at [insert email address], [insert phone number], or [insert address].

The brochure on the residential relocation program is also available in English at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/pubs/residential_english.pdf and in Spanish at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/pubs/residential_spanish.pdf.

If you own or rent a mobile home that may be moved or acquired by Caltrans, a relocation brochure is available in English at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/pubs/mobile_eng.pdf and in Spanish at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/pubs/mobile_sp.pdf.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2833 5/5/2026
Appendix C. Summary of Relocation Benefits
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
C-2
The Business and Farm Relocation Assistance Program
For more information or a brochure on the relocation of a business or farm, please contact [insert environmental planner’s name] at [insert email address], [insert phone number], or [insert address].

The brochure on the business relocation program is also available in English at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/pubs/business_farm.pdf and in Spanish at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/pubs/business_sp.pdf.

Additional Information
No relocation payment received would be considered as income for the purpose of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social Security Act or any other federal law (except for any federal law providing low-income housing assistance).

Persons who are eligible for relocation payments and who are legally occupying the property required for the project would not be asked to move without being given at least 90 days advance notice, in writing. Occupants of any type of dwelling eligible for relocation payments would not be required to move unless at least one comparable “decent, safe, and sanitary” replacement residence, open to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, is available or has been made available to them by the state.

Any person, business, farm, or non-profit organization, which has been refused a relocation payment by Caltrans, or believes that the payments are inadequate, may appeal for a hearing before a hearing officer or the Caltrans’ Relocation Assistance Appeals Board. No legal assistance is required; however, the displacee may choose to obtain legal counsel at his/her expense. Information about the appeal procedure is available from Caltrans’ Relocation Advisors.

The information above is not intended to be a complete statement of all of Caltrans’ laws and regulations. At the time of the first written offer to purchase, owner-occupants are given a more detailed explanation of the state's relocation services. Tenant occupants of properties to be acquired are contacted immediately after the first written offer to purchase, and also given a more detailed explanation of Caltrans’ relocation programs.

Important Notice
To avoid loss of possible benefits, no individual, family, business, farm, or non-profit organization should commit to purchase or rent a replacement property without first contacting a Department of Transportation relocation advisor at:

State of California
Department of Transportation, District #__
Address
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2834 5/5/2026
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
D-1
Appendix D List of Preparers
This document was prepared by the following staff:

Brian Calvert, Principal. Master of Environmental Planning, Arizona State University; B.A., Geography and Regional Science, George Washington University. Eighteen years of experience preparing CEQA/NEPA documents. Contribution: Project management, review of document.

Mari Piantka, Senior Environmental Planner. B.A., Environmental Studies, University Southern California, Santa Barbara; 15 years environmental planning experience.

Contribution: Helped manage and coordinate the environmental technical studies and environmental process for the project.

Tanya Jones, Environmental Planner. B.A., Environmental Analysis and Design, University of California, Irvine. Four years of experience preparing CEQA/NEPA documents.

Contribution: Housing, Population, Demographic, and Economic research.

Soraya Swiontek, GIS Coordinator. B.A., Anthropology and Philosophy, University of California, Irvine. Three years of experience in archaeology and GIS. Contribution: Created GIS figures.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2835 5/5/2026
Appendix D. List of Preparers
Community Impact Assessment
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
March 2014
D-2
This page left intentionally blank
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2836 5/5/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTACHMENT N15

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2837 5/5/2026
State of California Department of Transportation

1. UNDERTAKING DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
District County Route
(Local
Agency)
Local
Assistance
Project Prefix
Post Miles
(Project No.)
Charge Unit
(Agreement)
Expenditure Authorization
(Location)
12 ORA Santa
Ana
STPL 5063 136
(For Local Assistance projects off the highway system, use headers in italics) Project Description:

The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Attachment A, Figures 1 and 2). The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at-grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound off-ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities. During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I-5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment. New right-of-way, including both permanent acquisition and temporary easements, would be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

2. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS
The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project was established in consultation with Charles Baker, Principal Investigator, Senior Environmental Planner (PQS), and Jim Kaufman, Project Manager/Local Assistance Engineer. The APE maps are located in Attachment A in this Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR).

The APE was established as the limits of proposed construction, including the limits of the current and proposed right-of-way, temporary construction easements plus a sufficient buffer to allow heavy equipment to maneuver, and staging areas. The height of the vertical APE is the existing grade level.

The maximum depth of the vertical APE would be approximately 25 feet for excavation of the underpass structure. Six-foot diameter cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) pile extensions would be used at the bents and EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2838 5/5/2026
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency California Department of Transportation

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
For the federal undertaking described in Part 1: To minimize redundancy and paperwork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Officer, and in the spirit intended under the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (U.S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideration under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section §15064.5(a) and, as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 (a)(b) and (d).
[HPSR form: 08-20-07] Page 2
driven steel HP piles (HP 14x89) would be used at the abutments. The proposed pile lengths are anticipated to be 55 feet and 70 feet at the bents and the abutments, respectively.

The proposed project does include a limited number of partial and full acquisitions. These acquisitions do not have the potential to affect a historic property or its setting.

3. CONSULTING PARTIES / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
X Local Government (Head of local government, Preservation Office / Planning Department)  Orange County Historical Commission
211 W. Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana, CA 91702
 Santa Ana Historic Resources Commission
20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92702
On August 29, 2011, letters were sent to government agencies and consulting and interested parties who may have knowledge or concerns about historic properties in the area. In the letters, information was requested regarding historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, and archeological sites of significance within the project area. As of November 10, 2011, no responses were received by the above listed parties.

X Native American Tribes, Groups and Individuals
Name Affiliation Follow‐ups and Responses
Bernie Acuna Gabrielino- Tongva Tribe Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left for Beverly
Garcia, who represents Ms. Acuna,
requesting comment.

Cindi Alvitre Ti’at Society Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No reply received. Attempted telephone
contact, October 28, 2011; phone not in
service.

David Belardes Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians, Acjachemen Nation
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. No call made, as Mr.

Belardes is represented by Ms. Joyce
Perry, see below.

Linda Candelaria Gabrielino- Tongva Tribe Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No reply received. No call made, as Ms.

Candelaria is represented by Ms. Beverly
Garcia, see above.

Alfred Cruz Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left requesting
comment.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2839 5/5/2026
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency California Department of Transportation

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
For the federal undertaking described in Part 1: To minimize redundancy and paperwork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Officer, and in the spirit intended under the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (U.S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideration under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section §15064.5(a) and, as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 (a)(b) and (d).
[HPSR form: 08-20-07] Page 3
Robert F. Dorame Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left requesting
comment.

Sam Dunlap Gabrielino Tongva Nation Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left requesting
comment.

Anita Espinoza Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left requesting
comment.

Sonia Johnston Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. No call made, as Ms
Johnston is represented by Mr. Alfred Cruz,
see above.

Anthony Morales Gabrielino/Tongva Band of
Mission Indians
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. Telephone conversation
with Mr. Morales on October 28, 2011. Mr.

Morales stated that as with all trenching and
excavation, it was necessary to be vigilant. Mr.

Morales had no other concerns or requests.

Joyce Perry Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians, Acjachmen Nation
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left requesting
comment.

Anthony Rivera Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians, Acjachemen Nation
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. No call made, as Mr. Rivera
is represented by Ms. Joyce Perry, see
above.

Rebecca Robles United Coalition to Protect
Panhe
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. Follow up phone call,
October 28, 2011; message left requesting
comment.

Tommy John Rosas Tongva Ancestral Territorial
Tribal Nation
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. No call made, as Mr. Rosas
is available only by e-mail.

Adolph “Bud” Sepulveda Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
Sent a letter on September 2, 2011. No
reply received. No call made, as Mr.

Sepulveda is represented by Mr. Alfred
Cruz, see above.

X Native American Heritage Commission
A letter was sent on August 8, 2011 to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC responded on August 10, 2011 stating that a search of the sacred lands records files failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources within the proposed project area. The NAHC also provided a list of 15 Native American contacts throughout the region (see above table EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2840 5/5/2026
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency California Department of Transportation

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
For the federal undertaking described in Part 1: To minimize redundancy and paperwork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Officer, and in the spirit intended under the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (U.S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideration under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section §15064.5(a) and, as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 (a)(b) and (d).
[HPSR form: 08-20-07] Page 4
and Attachment D). Letters describing the project were sent on September 2, 2011 to the 15 Native American contacts provided by the NAHC. No responses have been received. A first round of telephone contact calls was made to these contacts or their representatives on October 28, 2011, with the results provided in the table above.

X Local Historical Society / Historic Preservation Group (also if applicable, city archives, etc.)  Historical and Cultural Foundation of Orange County
17200 Jamboree Road, Suite G
Irvine, CA 92714
 Heritage Museum of Orange County
3101 West Harvard Street
Santa Ana, CA 92704
 Heritage Orange County
515 North Main Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
 Orange County California Genealogical Society, Genealogy Collection, Huntington Beach Central Library
7111 Talbert Ave
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
 Orange County Historical Society
PO Box 10984
Santa Ana, CA 92711
 Santa Ana Historical Society
120 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701-7505
On August 29, 2011, letters were sent to government agencies and consulting and interested parties who may have knowledge or concerns about historic properties in the area. In the letters, information was requested regarding historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, and archeological sites of significance within the project area. As of November 10, 2011, no responses have been received from the above listed parties.

X Other
 SHPO correspondence on December 27, 2004 regarding the determination of eligibility for the Orange County Maintenance Yard.

4. SUMMARY OF IDENTIFICATION EFFORTS
X National Register of Historic Places Month & Year: 1979-2002 & supplements X California Register of Historical Resources Year: 1992 & supplemental information to date X California Inventory of Historic Resources Year: 1976 X California Historical Landmarks Year: 1995 & supplemental information to date X California Points of Historical Interest Year: 1992 & supplemental information to date X State Historic Resources Commission Year: 1980-present, minutes from quarterly meetings
X Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory Year: 2006 & supplemental information to date EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2841 5/5/2026
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency California Department of Transportation

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
[HPSR form: 09-10-07] Page 5
X Archaeological Site Records [List names of Institutions & date below]  South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton July 19, 2011 X Results: (provide a brief summary of records search and research results, as well as inventory findings)  On July 19, 2011, prior to field investigations, a literature search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton. The records search included a review of the SCCIC databases for previously identified historical/archaeological resources in or near the APE and all available cultural resource survey and excavation reports and site records for an area within a one-mile radius of the project area. The results of the records search indicate that 60 surveys have been conducted within a one-mile radius of the project APE; two of these encompassed small parts of the APE. Previous investigations identified 72 resources within a one-mile radius; four of these resources are recorded as being within the project APE (refer to Attachment C. Archaeological Survey Report).

5. PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED
X Stephen D. Mikesell, Jessica B. Feldman, and Elizabeth Hilton, who each meet the Professionally Qualified Staff Standards in Section 106 Programmatic Agreement Attachment 1 as a Principal Architectural Historian, have determined that the only other properties present within the APE meet the criteria for Section 106 PA Attachment 4 (Properties Exempt from Evaluation).

X Properties previously determined not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places are present within the Project APE. (Include date of determination):
 1111 East Fruit Street, Map Reference #16, determined ineligible for the National Register on December 24, 2004.
 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, Map Reference #34, determined ineligible for the National Register in June 2007.

X As assigned by FHWA, Caltrans has determined the following properties within the Project APE are not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places:

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
[HPSR form: 09-10-07] Page 6
1008 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 15
1111 East Fruit Street, Orange County Maintenance Yard Santa Ana, CA 6Z 16 1143 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 17
1207 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 18
1215 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 19
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County Maintenance Yard Santa Ana, CA 6Z 20 1140 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 21
1170 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 22
742-744 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 23
741 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 24
742 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 25
1041 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 26
1051 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 27
530 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 28
510 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 29
508 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 30
506 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 31
420 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 32
531 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 33
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Santa Ana, CA 6Z 34 X Properties previously listed or determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places are present within the Project APE. (Include date of listing or determination):
 1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County Maintenance Yard, Map Reference #20, determined eligible for the National Register on December 27, 2004; determined ineligible as part of this HPSR (see Attachment D, Historical Resources Evaluation Report).

6. LIST OF ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION
X Project Vicinity, Location, and APE Maps (Attachment A) X Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER)
 ICF, November 2011 (Attachment B)
X Archaeological Survey Report (ASR)
 ICF, November 2011 (Attachment C)
X Other (Specify below)
 NAHC and Native American Correspondence (Attachment D)  Interested Parties (Attachment E)
 SHPO Correspondence (Attachment F)

7. HPSR to File
X Not applicable.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2843 5/5/2026
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency California Department of Transportation

HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT
[HPSR form: 09-10-07] Page 7

8. HPSR to SHPO
X As assigned by FHWA, Caltrans has determined that there are properties evaluated as a result of the project that are not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places within the Project APE. Under Section 106 PA Stipulation VIII.C, Caltrans requests SHPO’s concurrence in this determination.

Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1019 East Washington Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 01
1042 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 02
1030 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 03
915-941 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 04
925 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 05
923 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 06
915-917 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 07
926 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 08
1102-1112 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 09
1024-1026 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 10
1022 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 11
1020 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 12
1016 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 13
1012 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 14
1008 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 15
1111 East Fruit Street, Orange County Maintenance Yard Santa Ana, CA 6Z 16 1143 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 17
1207 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 18
1215 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 19
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County Maintenance Yard Santa Ana, CA 6Z 20 1140 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 21
1170 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 22
742-744 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 23
741 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 24
742 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 25
1041 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 26
1051 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 27
530 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 28
510 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 29
508 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 30
506 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 31
420 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 32
531 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 33
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Santa Ana, CA 6Z 34 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2844 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2845 5/5/2026
Attachment A
Project Vicinity Map
Regional Location Map
APE Map
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2846 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2847 5/5/2026
5 405
5 5
405
55 91
261
73 57
72 22
133
90 133
90 261
72 91
261
57 22
Anaheim
Santa Ana
Irvine
Orange
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Fullerton
Tustin
Fountain Valley
Newport Beach
Westminster
Tustin Foothills
Placentia
Villa Park Villa Park
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
San Bernardino
Riverside
Imperial San Diego
Orange
Los Angeles
Kern
P a c i f i c
O c e a n
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig01_Regional_Vicinity.mxd SM, NB (09-19-11) Project Site
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2848 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2849 5/5/2026
Project Location
French Park French Park
Logan
Park
BNSF RR and Amtrak P E Railroad
15th
Walnut
Mcclay
Wright
Standard
Spurgeon
Washington
French
Elk
Linwood
Poinsettia
Lyon
Orange
Oakmont
Cypress
Halladay
Oak
Santiago
Main
Parrie
Hardly
14th
Grace
Maple
4th
Breeden
Trinidad
Lincoln
Kilson
Obarr
8th
Mabury
Brown
Dresser
Myrtle
Mortimer
Martha
Greenwood
5th
Penn
Eastside
Porter
11th
Stafford
12th
Terminal
Eastwood
Patricia
2nd
Camile
Court
Hathaway
Dorman
9th
10th
Valencia
Palm
Vance
Minnie
18th
Warren
Cedar
Concord
Custer
Wellington
Fuller
Fruit
6th
Fairmont
19th
Bush
20th
21st
Catalina
Logan
16th
3rd
Santa Fe
Minter
Garfield Hickory
Civic Center
Bishop
Pine
Lacy
Chestnut
Santa Ana
17th
Grand
Mortimer
Main
4th
1st
5th
5 Figure 2
Project Location Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig02_Project_Location.mxd SM, NB (09-19-11)) Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2850 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2851 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2852 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2853 5/5/2026
Attachment B
HRER
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2854 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2855 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2856 5/5/2026
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2857 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT S-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Summary of Findings
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation, including depressing the profile of Santa Ana Boulevard under the adjacent Metrolink tracks to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities. The Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) Attachment 1, Figures 1 & 2, contains the Project Location and Project Vicinity Maps.

As part of this Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), historic archaeological and built environment resources were identified and evaluated for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), as required by 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800 and the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (Section 106). The assessment also conforms to the Section 106 Programmatic Agreement (PA) executed January 1, 2004.

Architectural field surveys of the project’s proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) were conducted in August 2011, according to standard Department guidelines and procedures. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad was previously determined ineligible for the National Register, as was 1111 East Fruit Street. 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2, a contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation. The Orange County Maintenance Yard at 1102 E.

Fruit Street was previously determined eligible for the National Register in a letter from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) dated December 27, 2004; however, after EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2858 5/5/2026
Summary of Findings
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT S- 2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
the property was surveyed and re‐assessed, it has been concluded that the evaluation in 2004 was in error and the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or the California Register. Based on the field survey and further evaluation of the property by Stephen D. Mikesell of ICF International, that finding has been changed and 1102 E. Fruit Street has been determined ineligible for the National Register and California Register. Thirty additional properties were evaluated for this HRER. Stephen D. Mikesell, Jessica B. Feldman and Elizabeth Hilton of ICF International, who meet the Professionally Qualified Staff standards in Section 106 PA Attachment 1 as Principal Architectural Historians, have determined that none of the evaluated properties appear eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2859 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT TOC-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Table of Contents
Summary of Findings........................................................................................................ S‐1 Chapter 1 Project Description....................................................................................... 1‐1

1.1 Scope of Proposed Project ............................................................................................ 1‐1

1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 1‐1

1.3 Area of Potential Effects................................................................................................ 1‐2 Chapter 2 Research Methods........................................................................................ 2‐1

2.1 Sources of Information.................................................................................................. 2‐1

2.2 Themes to Establish Historic Context............................................................................ 2‐2

2.3 Public Participation and Consultation ........................................................................... 2‐2 Chapter 3 Field Methods .............................................................................................. 3‐1

3.1 Historic Architecture...................................................................................................... 3‐1

3.2 Archaeology.................................................................................................................... 3‐1 Chapter 4 Historical Overview....................................................................................... 4‐1

4.1 Local Historical Setting .................................................................................................. 4‐1

4.1.1 Orange County ................................................................................................... 4‐1

4.1.2 Santa Ana............................................................................................................ 4‐5

4.2 Transportation History ................................................................................................ 4‐10

4.2.1 Burlington Santa Fe Railroad ........................................................................... 4‐11

4.3 Architectural Development.............................................................................. 4‐11

4.3.1 Industrial Architecture ..................................................................................... 4‐11

4.3.2 Residential Architecture................................................................................... 4‐11 Chapter 5 Description of Cultural Resources................................................................ 5‐1 Chapter 6 Findings and Conclusions.............................................................................. 6‐1

6.1 Findings.......................................................................................................................... 6‐1

6.2 Conclusions.................................................................................................................... 6‐5 Chapter 7 Bibliography ................................................................................................. 7‐1 Chapter 8 Preparers’ Qualifications.............................................................................. 8‐1 Appendices
Appendix A ‐ Department of Parks and Recreation Forms: DPR 523 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2860 5/5/2026
Table of Contents
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT TOC- 2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
List of Abbreviated Terms
APE Area of Potential Effects
ASR Archaeological Survey Report
California Register California Register of Historical Resources Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Department California Department of Transportation
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
HOV high‐occupancy vehicle
HPSR Historic Property Survey Report
HRER Historical Resources Evaluation Report
National Register National Register of Historic Places
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
PA Programmatic Agreement
PQS Professionally Qualified Staff
ROW right‐of‐way
SCCIC South Central Coastal Archaeological Information Center TCE temporary construction easements
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2861 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 1 Project Description

1.1 Scope of Proposed Project
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County (County), California. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

1.2 Project Description
Currently, 66 trains cross Santa Ana Boulevard at this location on weekdays. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard.

The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I‐5) southbound off‐ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul‐de‐sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2862 5/5/2026
Chapter 1. Project Description
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1- 2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities. During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I‐5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment. The project also proposes to construct a two‐lane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard, which would be used by traffic during the construction of the underpass bridge and its approaches. The project also proposes to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right‐of‐way, including both permanent acquisitions and temporary easements, would be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

Construction staging areas for the proposed project would potentially be located on the following properties: APNs 398‐093‐13, 398‐092‐12, and 398‐207‐01. The disposal site for the proposed project, if needed, would be selected by the contractor. Any environmental clearances related to the disposal site will be obtained by the contractor prior to construction.

The proposed project is included in the 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and 2011 cost constrained Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) (federal approval date of December 14, 2010) as project ID ORA082610. The project as proposed is consistent with the 2011 FTIP description.

1.3 Area of Potential Effects
The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project was established in consultation with Charles Baker, Principal Investigator, Senior Environmental Planner (PQS), and Jim Kaufman, Project Manager/Local Assistance Engineer. The APE maps are located in Attachment A in the Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2863 5/5/2026
Chapter 1. Project Description
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1- 3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
The APE was established as the limits of proposed construction, including the limits of the current and proposed right‐of‐way, temporary construction easements plus a sufficient buffer to allow heavy equipment to maneuver, and staging areas. The proposed project does include a limited number of partial and full acquisitions. These acquisitions do not have the potential to affect the setting of a historic property. The height of the vertical APE is the existing grade level. The maximum depth of the vertical APE would be approximately 25 feet for excavation of the underpass structure. Six‐foot diameter cast‐in‐drilled‐hole (CIDH) pile extensions would be used at the bents and driven steel HP piles (HP 14x89) would be used at the abutments. The proposed pile lengths are anticipated to be 55 feet and 70 feet at the bents and the abutments, respectively. The APE maps are located in Attachment A in the HPSR.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2864 5/5/2026
Chapter 1. Project Description
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1- 4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2865 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 2 Research Methods

2.1 Sources of Information
National, state, and local inventories of historic properties and historical resources were reviewed to determine the location of previously documented historic and architectural resources proximate to the project.

The following standard sources of information were reviewed in the process of compiling this report:
 National Register of Historic Places (http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr);  California Historical Landmarks (State of California, 1996) et seq.;  California Points of Historical Interest (State of California, 1992) et seq.;  California Register of Historical Resources;
 California Historic Resource Inventory System; and
 Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory.

A record search was conducted by the project archaeologists for the proposed project at the South Central Coastal Archaeological Information Center (SCCIC) on July 19, 2011.

The record search included a review of the SCCIC databases for previously identified historical/archaeological resources in or near the APE and existing cultural resources reports pertaining to the vicinity.

Additional resources consulted in the process of compiling this report included the following:
 ProQuest digital archives for the Orange Register;
 TRW/Experian;
 Santa Ana Public Library and Local History Room historic maps, and newspaper clipping vertical files, and Santa Ana city directories;  Los Angeles Public Library History and Genealogy Department Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps and Santa Ana city directories;
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2866 5/5/2026
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
 City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (http://www.ci.santa‐ ana.ca.us/pba/planning/documents/Hist‐register_May05/pdf), and;  Santa Ana Planning Department.

None of the properties located within the APE are listed on federal, state, or local lists of historic resources except for the Orange County Maintenance Yard, which was determined eligible for the National Register by SHPO on December 27, 2004. In addition, 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2, a contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation. This determination was provided by a search of the Historic Resources Inventory. However, no information regarding the survey, surveyor or project related to this finding was available. No archaeological resources were identified within the project APE.

2.2 Themes to Establish Historic Context
To establish the historic context, appropriate research was conducted to evaluate the resources within the APE. The research themes included the following:
a. Community Development,
b. Industrial Development in Santa Ana,
c. Local Architecture,
d. Transportation.

2.3 Public Participation and Consultation
On August 29, 2011, letters were sent to government agencies and consulting and interested parties who may have knowledge or concerns about historic properties in the area. In the letters, information was requested regarding historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, and archeological sites of significance within the project area. The letters were sent to the recipients shown on the following page.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2867 5/5/2026
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Historical and Cultural Foundation of
Orange County
17200 Jamboree Road, Suite G
Irvine, CA 92714
Orange County Historical Commission
211 W. Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana, CA 91702
Heritage Museum of Orange County
3101 West Harvard Street
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Orange County Historical Society
PO Box 10984
Santa Ana, CA 92711
Heritage Orange County
515 North Main Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Santa Ana Historic Resources Commission
20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M‐20
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Orange County California Genealogical
Society
Genealogy Collection, Huntington Beach
Central Library
7111 Talbert Ave
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Santa Ana Historical Society
120 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701‐7505
As of September 22, 2011, no letters emails, or phone calls concerning the proposed project have been received from the above listed parties (see Attachment E of the HPSR).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2868 5/5/2026
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2869 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 3-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 3 Field Methods

3.1 Historic Architecture
Pursuant to standard Department guidelines and procedures, on August 18, 2011, field surveys of all properties that have been developed with buildings or other structures within the project APE were undertaken by ICF International. Stephen D. Mikesell and Jessica B. Feldman, architectural historians, acted as Principal Co‐Investigators for this project. Elizabeth Hilton, Principal Architectural Historian, completed the fieldwork and conducted the historic research analysis and writing. All persons meet the PA criteria for professionally qualified staff. All parcels were observed from the public right‐of‐way, and digital photographs were taken of all buildings and structures that were visible on each property. The criteria found in Attachment 4 of the Section 106 PA for properties that are exempt from evaluation were applied in the field, with follow‐up in‐office confirmation of construction dates and substantial alterations.

3.2 Archaeology
A records search for the APE and surrounding area was conducted at the SCCIC on July 19, 2011. No archaeological resources have been previously recorded within or adjacent to the APE. On September 11, 2011, a survey was conducted of the project APE. The area was found to be completely developed with commercial and industrial buildings, residential properties, lawn, and paving. No areas of open, undisturbed land were identified. Mark Robinson, Principal Investigator Archaeology, per the standards in Section 106 PA Attachment 1, directed this analysis. (See HPSR, Attachment C: ASR)

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2870 5/5/2026
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2871 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 4 Historical Overview

4.1 Local Historical Setting
The proposed project occurs entirely within the City of Santa Ana in Orange County.

Ranching‐ and agricultural‐related occupancy of the land dates from at least the early nineteenth century during the Spanish/Mexican Colonial period. A massive expansion of agricultural homesteading activities occurred during the Anglo‐American settlement in this portion of Northern Orange County during the last three decades of the nineteenth century, culminating in the establishment of the City of Santa Ana in 1869, and the founding, nearby, of the City of Tustin in 1870. As it exists today, development within the project area is comprised of industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential buildings dating from the turn‐of‐the‐twentieth century, early‐twentieth century, and mid‐twentieth century. Rather than reflecting the region’s early nineteenth century ranching history, instead, it reflects the ongoing urbanization and industrialization of the setting associated with the arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1877, the Santa Fe Railroad in 1888, and the Pacific Electric Interurban railroad in 1904 and the resulting concentration of industrial uses and worker housing in the setting.

4.1.1 Orange County
The period of European colonization of California began during the late 1760s with establishment, under the Spanish Crown, of missions at San Diego in 1769, San Juan Capistrano in 1775, and San Gabriel in 1771. These settlements, and efforts to intern the native people at the missions, and convert them to Christianity, mark the period prior to Mexican independence from Spain in 1821. For administrative purposes, the Spanish missionaries divided the native people into two groups named for the missions responsible for their territories. The Native Americans were of Uto‐Aztecan origin and belonged to the Shoshonean linguistic group. Many of the names the tribes used to describe themselves have been lost to history.1
Those residing south of Aliso Creek
were referred to as the Juaneños (in reference to San Juan Capistrano Mission) while those to the north in present day Santa Ana were referred to as the Gabrieleños (in reference to the San Gabriel Mission). Through new policies during the early 1830s, the

1 Hallan-Gibson, Pamela. 2002. Orange County: The Golden Promise – An Illustrated History. Sun Valley, CA: American Historical Press. p. 24.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2872 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Mexican government both secularized the missions and also made a large number of land grants to its citizens in an effort to promote settlement in California and to discourage claims on the territory by the United States and Russia. During the period between 1833 and 1846 approximately 700 land grants were conferred, twenty of which were wholly or partially within the boundaries of Orange County.

The project area occurs within the boundaries of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. In 1810, this land grant was made under Spanish rule to Bernardo Yorba when his father‐ in‐law Juan Pablo Grijalva died prior to the grant being approved. Members of the Yorba family reconfirmed title to the 63,414‐acre property in 1839.2 Although the Yorba family claim to its ranch was upheld again by the U.S. Land Commission (1855), the number and conflicting nature of claims by heirs as well as other non‐family claimants led to the partition of the rancho in 1866.3
Among the non‐family claimants was Jacob
Ross, Sr. Three years later, Ross sold 74 acres of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana to Kentuckian William D. Spurgeon, who then founded the City of Santa Ana.

California counties were delineated in 1850. The 500 residents located in the Santa Ana Valley, of what is now known as Orange County, were included at the time within the boundaries of Los Angeles County. But as the population and wealth of the Santa Ana Valley began to grow so too did the sentiment for the formation of a separate, distinct county. A trip to the Los Angeles County seat took many hours over uncertain dirt roads and there was a growing resentment that the taxes being sent to Los Angeles were not being returned in a fair share of public works.

In 1870, Maximilian Strobel, a resident of the town of Anaheim, introduced to the State legislature a proposal for all the territory south of the San Gabriel River to separate from Los Angeles and become Anaheim County. The proposal was approved by the Assembly but was not ratified in the Senate. Although this initial effort was unsuccessful, half a dozen subsequent attempts were made to organize a coalition for separation, suggesting the names of Santa Ana, Anaheim and Orange for the new county. These proposals met with opposition in Sacramento, primarily from Los Angeles, which did not want to lose a part of its tax base. In the next round of proposals for county formation, the northern boundary was changed from the San Gabriel River to Coyote Creek, and in 1889, the proposal was approved for the creation of Orange County. In the same year,

2 Ibid. p. 34.
3 Cleland, Robert Glass. 1962. The Irvine Ranch. San Marino: Huntington Library. Pp. 32-33.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2873 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
the City of Santa Ana was selected by vote as the Orange County seat.4 William Spurgeon, the founder of the City of Santa Ana, became a member of the newly established County board of supervisors and was elected as board chairman.5 “Orange County is a most inviting field for the home‐seeker, where the fig and vine, the luscious orange and acidulous lemon, the rich olive, the meaty walnut and peanut, the pomegranate and guava, apples, quinces, peaches, pears, plums, nectarines and prunes, blackberries, strawberries, raspberries, grains and vegetables thrive, make abundant return, and amply reward the husbandman for his time and labor.”6 This statement appeared in a booklet published in 1897 by the Orange County Herald. The County was proud of its 227,000 orange trees, 95,000 apricot trees, 165,000 other fruit trees, 140,000 nut trees, and between 3,000 and 5,000 beehives. Unfortunately, in 1888, blight resulted in the death of approximately two million grapevines in Anaheim, and another 300,000 perished in Orange, Westminster, Garden Grove and Santa Ana.

Commercial grape cultivation never recovered, and near the end of the century, less than 500 acres in the County were still producing grapes.

After the blight of the grape vines, “farmers also planted plums, prunes, peaches, pears and walnuts. While they waited for these trees to bear, they added quick row crops between them – corn, beans, potatoes, tomatoes. Celery had been a popular crop in Santa Ana during the 1890s until blight decimated the plants and caused growers to look for other suitable and profitable crops to grow. This led farmers in Santa Ana and the Irvine Ranch to cultivate lima beans, sugar beets, and barley. The production of barley led them from wine to malt liquor making, and breweries flourished for a while.

Sugar beet production formed the basis for granulated sugar industry—a major portion of the agricultural revenue in Orange County for many years (e.g., the Holly Sugar Company, Santa Ana). Surprisingly, enough tobacco was also grown in the late 1880s to support several cigar factories.”7

4 Gass, Mary. 1988.“The Formation of Orange County.” In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Esther R. Cramer, Keith A Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi and Clarice Blamer, editors. Santa Ana: Orange County Centennial, Inc. pp 36-37. 5 Goddard.
6 Walker, Doris. 1989. Orange County, a Centennial Celebration: Sections of Orange. Houston: Pioneer Publications.
7 Ibid.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2874 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Orange County also produced chili peppers in Anaheim and avocados in Yorba Linda.

Walnuts also proved to be very profitable for the County. “Walnuts were grown in several areas of the County but were particularly successful in the San Juan Capistrano, La Habra, and Placentia areas where the water table was high and the soils were deep.”8

During the 1920s through the 1960s the County was producing a large portion of the world’s crop of soft‐shelled walnuts.

The mild southern California weather made Orange County an ideal place to produce oranges. Valencia oranges, first introduced by Richard Gilman of Placentia, California in 1872 from experiments while he was working at the Southern California Semi‐Tropical Fruit Company, allowed Orange County to live up to its name. In 1875, the first commercial grove of Valencia oranges in Southern California were planted in Fullerton.

Orange County became an official county in 1889; the namesake was derived from the numerous orchards that occupied the area. Many of the fields that once produced wine grapes were now producing Valencia oranges. Orange boosters promoted “Anaheim, Home of the Finest Sunkist Valencia Oranges.” By 1915, the chamber of commerce was calling Anaheim the “Capital of the Valencia Orange Empire.”9 Beginning in 1921, the California Valencia Orange Show opened in Anaheim and continued for ten years. The Valencia orange became Orange County’s official tree, in 1930, the same year several communities joined forces to hold the Orange County Valencia Show and Fair. “In 1938, the Valencia oranges peak in Orange County, 67,536 acres was planted, with production of over 9.3 million boxes, worth $16.9 million.”10 During the same decade, “Orange County was producing a sixth of the nation’s Valencia orange crop.”11 Oranges covered only 20,000 acres by the 1960s, with less than a dozen packing houses remaining. The Valencia orange continued to be Orange County’s most profitable product until 1966, when the number of orchards was greatly reduced from development.

8 Gass, Mary. 1988. . “The Formation of Orange County.” In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Esther R. Cramer, Keith A. Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi and Clarice A. Blamer, editors, pp. 36-37. The Orange County Centennial, Inc., Santa Ana, CA 1988.
9 Faessel, Stephen J. 2006. Early Anaheim. Charleston: Arcadia. 10 Ibid. 11 Quoted from the “Wealth from the Soil” portion of “A Brief History of Orange County.” This three-page digest was produced by the County Clerk’s Office and is found online at:
http://www.ocsd.org/vgnfiles/ocgove/Clerk-Recorder/DOC
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2875 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-5

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
In addition to agriculture, the petroleum oil production and processing industry was a major factor in the development of Orange County. The first producing oil well in the County was drilled in Brea in 1882,12 and one of the County’s most famous companies, Union Oil, was formed by Lyman Stewart and Wallace Hardison, who had been active with the Brea oil strike.13 However, the success of early oil production efforts in the Brea and La Habra (1885) area was to be overshadowed by the major strikes at Placentia in 1919 (Chapman #1) and at Huntington Beach in 1920.14 By the 1960s, long after urban development had supplanted nearly all agricultural acreage in the County, oil production remained a prominent visual feature on the landscape.

4.1.2 Santa Ana
With the founding by William H. Spurgeon of the City of Santa Ana in 1869, and his laying out of a 24‐block village, the urban history of Santa Ana began. The community, however, would remain primarily agrarian in character for the next several decades of its history, notwithstanding several significant local historical events that factored prominently in the development history of the community. These include the arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad in Santa Ana in 1877; the McFadden Brothers’ contemporaneous development of a landing at Newport Beach from which Santa Ana Valley goods could be shipped by sea; the arrival of the Santa Fe Railroad in 1888; the 1889 formation of Orange County out of Los Angeles County that established Santa Ana as the seat of the new county government; and extension of the Pacific Electric Railway to Santa Ana in 1904. Despite these rather momentous developments, Santa Ana had a population of only 8,429 in 1910.

The area Spurgeon chose for the town site was the covered with tall stands of yellow mustard and was bounded on the south by First Street, on the west by Broadway (formerly West Street), on the north by Seventh Street, and on the east by Spurgeon Street.15 Spurgeon operated the town’s general store and its first post office and served as postmaster for the Santa Ana Valley area residents. He induced Wells Fargo into

12 “A Brief History of Orange County.” Loc cit. The oil production efforts by the Puente Oil and La Habra Oil Companies are also discussed by Hallan-Gibson, pp 157-158. 13 Hallan-Gibson, p 160.
14 Ibid. Loc cit.
15 Goddard, Francelia B. and Allen W. 1968. In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. The document has been excerpted and was found online at the following location: www.santaanahistory.com/local_history.html EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2876 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-6

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
providing stage coach service to the fledgling community by cutting a three‐mile road to the north where it approached the so‐called “Rodriguez Crossing” of the Santa Ana River.16 Spurgeon seems to have worked tirelessly to promote the success of Santa Ana, spearheading the incorporation movement and efforts to bring railroad service to the community.

In 1877, J.H. Fruit, James McFadden, and Spurgeon organized a company known as the Western Development Company in order to raise the funds needed to encourage the Southern Pacific Railroad to extend its line to Santa Ana from Anaheim.17 The train depot location, just north of Fruit Street, was used as an opportunity to create a new business district and sell land at a larger profit margin than had been the case previously in developing Santa Ana. This subdivision formed the direct basis of the project area.

The depot area encompassed some 160 acres northeast of the original town site. As noted by writer Charles Swanner, it was platted as commercial property with 25‐foot street frontages, “...and its streets were laid out parallel with, or at right angles to, the Southern Pacific track, and tangent with all other streets in town,” thus explaining the neighborhood’s distinctive street patterns.18 The Western Development Company was unsuccessful in its efforts to entice businesses to relocate from the original town site to the depot tract. Consequently, the land was re‐subdivided for residential, and eventually, industrial purposes. Due to its physical separation from the earlier business core and the proximity to the city’s railroad corridors, the subdivision attracted working class families and was one of the few areas in the city where real estate agents would sell property to Mexican Americans.19 By the late nineteenth century, this became the genesis of the Logan Barrio.

Logan Barrio
Most of the properties were owner‐occupied in the Logan Barrio area, which was first settled at the turn of the century. City directories, Sanborn Maps, and US Census records show that in many cases, extended family members shared the residences or

16 Swanner, Charles D. 1953. Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870-1910. Claremont, CA: Saunders Press, p. 16.
17 Ibid. pp 18-19.
18 Ibid. p 19. The depot location is described by Stephen Gould in his book The Effect of the Railroads on the Development of Santa Ana and Tustin. Yorba Linda: Shumway Family History Series. p 3. 19 Irving, Doug. “Still Fighting for ‘Sacred Ground’ of Logan Barrio.” The Orange County Register, January 19, 2008.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2877 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-7

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
built small auxiliary dwellings on individual parcels. The 1920 US Census records for Lincoln Avenue and Logan Street show that most men living in the neighborhood worked as general laborers. Residents of this area also may have been employed by the warehouses to the south, as fruit packers, or as pickers in the many citrus farms in the immediate area.

Lincoln Avenue, located within the project area, was the eastern boundary of the Logan Barrio. The north boundary may have been E. Washington Street. When the Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana were published in 1906, the south end of Lincoln ended at Depot Street, just a few blocks from the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific depots. “C” Street, later Santiago Street, and the lumber yards and mills of J.M. Griffith Company provided the western boundary of the Logan Barrio. This was primarily a residential neighborhood until the 1950s, with no pattern of development associated with specific persons or events being evident. In the 1950s, many single‐family homes were demolished, and parcels, especially along Lincoln Avenue, were merged into large lots occupied by small businesses and industrial facilities.

In the post‐World War II era, most of the undeveloped parcels of the Logan Barrio were occupied. Santa Ana Sanborn Mapsheet 20, prepared in 1949, notes that “all occupancies in these two blocks are Mexican,” referring to Logan Street and Lincoln Avenue between Fruit (formerly Depot) to the south and E. Washington Street to the north. Many parcels contained more than one dwelling. On the north side of Stafford, between Logan Street and Lincoln Avenue, was the Logan School, a segregated public school that served the barrio. Several businesses were located at the intersection of Stafford and Logan Streets, including stores and a bakery. Today, most properties along Lincoln Avenue are industrial; although, some residential properties still remain. Logan Street remains primarily residential, although many of the original dwellings from the 1920s have been demolished and replaced with contemporary single‐family homes.

City Development
The incorporation of the City of Santa Ana was likely related to lobbying efforts on behalf of establishing a separate county jurisdiction in which Santa Ana would serve as the county seat, and efforts to encourage the Santa Fe Railroad to establish a depot in EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2878 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-8

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Santa Ana (1887‐1888). When the City of Santa Ana incorporated in June 1886, it boasted a population of 2,000. Spurgeon became its first mayor.20 The 1910s and early 1920s period was one of major new development in and bordering Santa Ana. In 1912, the voters approved a $1.2 million road improvements bond that led to the paving and improvement of key “inter‐city roads” in Orange County. Three years later more than 108 miles of road work had been completed.21 By the end of the decade, and continuing into the 1920s, aggressive promotional efforts on the part of the County Board of Supervisors and the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce brought new businesses and a flood of new homeowners into the area.22 At the opening of the 1940s, and with a small population of only 32,000, Santa Ana continued to be chiefly an agricultural community, serving also as a regional government and business center. As the primary storage and distribution point for Orange County agricultural and dairy products, it was the locus, almost exclusively, for small‐scale food processing and furniture manufacturing businesses of local and regional scope. Due to local planning policies that discouraged the development of typical smokestack industry, the largest manufacturing facility in Santa Ana was the Holly Sugar Company’s Dyer Station Plant, which processed sugar beets into granulated sugar.

Dating from 1912, it stood on the north side of Dyer Road between Halladay and Grand Streets well south of the Santa Ana municipal boundaries.

Until the 1940s, local planning and economic policy was not focused on promoting new industrial development in Santa Ana. Local land use policies regarding industrialization shifted during the late 1940s, in all likelihood due to the emergence of technology‐ based industry opportunities during World War II and related lobbying efforts by local business and business‐friendly stakeholders in the community.23 The mobilization for World War II ushered in these and other dramatic changes to Orange County. Santa Ana went so far as to send a lobbyist to Washington to try to interest the government in developing a military base in the area. Groundbreaking on October 23, 1941 for the

20 Goddard. Loc cit.
21 Ibid. p 201.
22 Ibid. p 191.
23 Braitsch, Fred G. “Young Industrial Giant Booming in Santa Ana.” n.d. from The [Santa Ana Daily] Register. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2879 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-9

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
West Coast Army Air Corps Training Command headquarters shows that such efforts were successful. The Air Corps property, located where Orange Coast College is today, “brought growth, jobs, and economic revitalization” to a community still struggling to recover from the Great Depression.24 The opening of the Santa Ana Air Station (1942) and U.S. Marine Corps Air Station at El Toro (1942) served to further bolster military‐ related job and business opportunities in the Santa Ana area.

Informally established in 1953 (officially organized February 1955), the Industrial Development Division of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce took its mission quite seriously of attracting new industry to Santa Ana, and of lobbying local government for infrastructure report for such development. It was described in The [Orange County] Register as having been “…the leading force in bringing industry into Santa Ana.”25 By 1968, the Industrial Development Division was credited with having created 15,740 new jobs in Santa Ana and with having increased manufacturing payroll by 1,043 percent between 1953 and1968.26 In the early 1940s, most Santa Ana area industrial workers had been commuters to Los Angeles and Long Beach; however, by the 1960s many workers found employment in Orange County, due chiefly to the dramatic expansion of technology‐based manufacturing that the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and other boosters helped usher in. Historian Pamela Hallan‐Gibson writes that “…a human tsunami swept over Santa Ana and Orange County in the 1950s, taking much of the old culture with it.” This was most notably reflected in the transformation of the landscape “as farmland gave way to urban development.”27 The population figures starkly convey this change. In 1940, there were 130,760 inhabitants in the County. By 1960, the Orange County population had grown to approximately 704,000.28

24 Hallan-Gibson, p 219.
25 Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce, Industrial Development Division. “Santa Ana: The City of Opportunity.” 1969 Centennial Special Edition magazine supplement to The Register, March 12, 1969. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.
26 Santa Ana Register. February 1, 1959 “Santa Ana Industry up 26 Per Cent.” n.a. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history. 27 Hallan-Gibson p. 236
28 Ibid. p. 237.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2880 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-10

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION

4.2 Transportation History
There is one railroad segment located within the APE (Map Reference #32). The small section of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe alignment in the project APE crosses 4th Street, Santa Ana Boulevard, and runs parallel to Lincoln Avenue. Two train depots were once located in the project area; the last one standing was demolished to accommodate the larger depot built in 1985 that is sited on the west side of the tracks in the APE.

With the boom provided by the popularity of the navel orange and the establishment of the railroad, Santa Ana’s population rose by the turn of the century. The Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Railroad reached Santa Ana by 1887, when “ten horse cars went to Tustin and two trains to Fairview, while 41 trains or trolleys touched Santa Ana each day.”29 Business took advantage of rail transportation and developed buildings along the rail line, near the depot to provide easy access to the trains. Some of these companies included JM Griffith Company’s Mill and Lumber Yard, which flanked Stafford street along the tracks; Santa Ana Wollen Mills, located at Santiago and Washington Avenues; Westco Company Limited Marble Cutting and Polishing, north of the Woolen Mills; Standard Oil Company of California, sited east of the tracks along Santiago Avenue and north of Stafford; Holly Sugar Corporation, adjacent to the Incline Electric Railroad Trestle; JE Taylor and Company Fruit Cannery south of 4th Street; Smith and Miner Packaging House south of 6th Street and west of the tracks; Gowan and Willards Packaging House south of 6th Street and east of the tracks; CC Collins and Sanborn’s Walnut Houses north of 4th Street; SH Pendleton Lumber and Mill Company west of the tracks and North of 4th Street; and the Southern California Creamery and Ice Company flanked by the Southern Pacific Railroad and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad at 4th Street. In 1995, Burlington Northern Railroad merged with the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe to form Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF).

In 1906, the Pacific Electric built a Red Car line along Fourth Street in Santa Ana that carried passengers between the city and Los Angeles until the 1950s, when the tracks were removed. In 1953, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) was established between Broadway and First Street.30 It has since extended south of San Diego, at the Mexico – United States border, north through Santa Ana, Los Angeles, Sacramento, and through

29 Goddard. Loc cit.
30 Ibid.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2881 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-11

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Oregon and Washington to the International Border with Canada. The freeway was built in several stages until the 1980s, replacing the previously existing US 99.31 Santa Ana Boulevard was constructed in the 1950s, and is the main route of transportation from the train station to the center of town.

4.3 Architectural Development

4.3.1 Industrial Architecture
The architectural forms that predominate within the Santa Ana portion of the APE are solitary or grouped one‐story, tilt‐up concrete buildings of straight‐forward, utilitarian design, with minimal steel industrial sash‐type fenestration. These generally have no architectural design embellishments of any kind, and are typical, commonplace examples of small‐scale industrial development in Southern California dating from the mid‐century. The earliest of these industrial buildings dates from the 1920s, used by the General Petroleum Company and the Orange County Maintenance Yard, which is composed of large rectangular storage buildings with metal siding.

4.3.2 Residential Architecture
The residential sections of the APE were developed beginning the turn of the century and continuing through the 1920s. On the west side of the railroad tracks was the Logan Barrio, occupied by Mexican immigrants, most of whom were day laborers. The architectural styles range from turn‐of‐the‐century National and Craftsman Styles to mid‐century Minimal Traditional dwellings. Several parcels within the project APE have been in filled with newer construction. The same can be said of the neighborhood to the east of the railroad, along Eastwood Avenue. This area was developed in the 1920s, likely as a result of the railroad, and features prominent styles of the time, such as Craftsman and Spanish Colonial Revival residences. The few properties in the APE that border Eastwood Avenue along Fruit Street were in fill construction in the mid‐century, or were relocated to the current site.

31 Interstate 5 in California. AARoads. Accessed August 31, 2011 at: http://www.aaroads.com/california/i005_ca.html EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2882 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-12

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2883 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 5-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 5 Description of Cultural Resources
The project APE, which is located in the City of Santa Ana, consists overwhelmingly of industrial and residential development. Thirty‐four properties occur within the Santa Ana Grade Separation Project APE that required evaluation. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad was previously determined ineligible for the National Register and the California Register, as was 1111 East Fruit Street. 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2, a contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation. This determination was provided by a search of the Historic Resources Inventory. However, no information regarding the survey, surveyor, or project related to this finding was available.

The Orange County Maintenance Yard was previously evaluated and determined eligible for the National Register by SHPO on December 27, 2004; however, the property was re‐ evaluated as a part of this survey. This re‐evaluation was due in part to the availability of new information regarding the historic context of maintenance yard architecture and planning. The buildings located within the APE are composed of single and multi‐family residences, commercial and industrial buildings, and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. These buildings are located in a developed setting with buildings dating from the early‐to‐mid‐century. These resources are discussed in more detail in the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms included in Appendix A.

None of the properties appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register; a re‐evaluation of the Orange County Maintenance Yard at 1102 East Fruit Street concluded that the evaluation in 2004 was in error and the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or the California Register.

No previously identified archaeological sites are located within the APE.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2884 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION

This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2885 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 6 Findings and Conclusions

6.1 Findings
The findings listed below are for the 34 properties located within the Santa Ana Grade Project APE.
a. No properties in the APE are listed in the National Register. b. One property in the APE was previously determined eligible for the National Register.

Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 3S 20
c. Two properties in the APE were previously determined not eligible for the National Register.

Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1111 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 16
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Santa Ana, CA 6Z 34 d. No properties in the APE were determined eligible for the National Register as a result of the current study.
e. A total of thirty‐four properties were determined ineligible for the National Register as a result of the current study.

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
915‐917 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 07
926 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 08
1102‐1112 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 09
1024‐1026 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 10
1022 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 11
1020 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 12
1016 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 13
1012 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 14
1008 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 15
1143 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 17
1207 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 18
1215 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 19
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z 20
1140 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 21
1170 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 22
742‐744 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 23
741 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 24
742 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 25
1041 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 26
1051 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 27
530 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 28
510 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 29
508 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 30
506 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 31
420 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 32
531 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 33
f. No resources were identified for which further study is required. g. Two properties were identified that had been previously considered historical resources for the purposes of CEQA and were re‐evaluated for the purposes of this study.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2887 5/5/2026
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
917 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z (previously 5D2) 07 1111 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z (previously 3S) 16
Both properties were re‐evaluated during the survey and research phase of this project.

The designation of 917 North Logan Street as a 5D2 occurred more than 20 years ago and did not have supporting documentation. The reassessment of 1111 East Fruit Street occurred after the review of the previous determination identified some errors in that evaluation. Subsequent field survey and research provided new information on the historic context of the property.
h. A total of 34 resources were identified that do not meet the California Register criteria outlined in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1.

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1207 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 18
1215 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 19
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z 20
1140 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 21
1170 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 22
742‐744 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 23
741 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 24
742 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 25
1041 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 26
1051 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 27
530 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 28
510 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 29
508 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 30
506 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 31
420 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 32
531 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 33
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Santa Ana, CA 6Z 34 Stephen D. Mikesell, Jessica B. Feldman, and Elizabeth Hilton of ICF International, who exceeded the Professionally Qualified Staff standards in Section 106 PA Attachment 1 as Principal Architectural Historians, have determined that the other properties present within the APE, including state‐owned resources, meet the criteria for Section 106 PA Attachment 4 (Properties Exempt from Evaluation).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2889 5/5/2026
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-5

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION

6.2 Conclusions
Thirty‐four built environment properties have been evaluated as part of this HRER. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad was determined ineligible for the National Register and the California Register in 2007, as was 1102 East Fruit Street in 2004. 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2. Due to a lack of supporting documentation of that finding and because it was assessed more than 20 years ago, it has been re‐evaluated and determined individually ineligible for the National Register and California Register. The Orange County Maintenance Yard was previously determined eligible for the National Register by SHPO on December 27, 2004.

A re‐assessment of the determination and supporting documentation for 1102 East Fruit Street concluded that the finding in 2004 was in error and the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard is ineligible for the National Register and the California Register. All of the evaluated properties have been found to be ineligible for the National Register and the California Register. All other properties within the APE meet the criteria for Section 106 PA Attachment 4 (Properties Exempt from Evaluation).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2890 5/5/2026
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-6

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2891 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 7 Bibliography
AARoads
2011 Interstate 5 in California. Accessed August 31, 2011 at:
http://www.aaroads.com/california/i‐005_ca.html
Ancestry.com
1920 Census Records.

Braitsch, Fred G.
n.d. Young Industrial Giant Booming in Santa Ana. Santa Ana Register. On file:

Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping, vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.

California Department of Transportation
2000 SR‐55 Background and History. District 12, Orange County. Available:
<http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist12/sr55PAC/55background.htm>.

Cleland, Robert Glass
1962 The Irvine Ranch. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.

Faessel, Stephen J.
2006 Early Anaheim. Charleston: Arcadia.

Garcia, Maria
2007 Santa Ana’s Logan Barrio: It’s History, Stories, and Family. Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society.

Gass, Mary
1988 The Formation of Orange County. In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Esther R. Cramer, Keith A. Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi, and Clarice A. Blamer (eds.), pp. 36–37. Santa Ana, CA:

The Orange County Centennial, Inc.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2892 5/5/2026
Chapter 7. Bibliography
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Goddard, Francelia B. and Allen W.
1968 In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities.
www.santaanahistory.com/local_history.html
Gould, Stephen
n.d. The Effect of the Railroads on the Development of Santa Ana and Tustin.

Yorba Linda: Shumway Family History Series.

Hallan‐Gibson, Pamela
2002 Orange County: The Golden Promise – An Illustrated History. Sun Valley, CA: American Historical Press.

ICF Jones & Stokes
2008 SR‐91 Westbound Widening Project from State Route 57 to Interstate 5.

Historical Resources Evaluation Report.

Irving, Doug.
2008 “Still Fighting for ‘Sacred Ground’ of Logan Barrio.” The Orange County Register.

Luskey Brothers
1923 Santa Ana, Tustin, Garden Grove and Vicinity City Directory. 1933 Orange County Directory.
1954 Luskey’s Official Santa Ana, Orange, Tustin, and Central Orange County Criss Cross Directory.
1962 Luskey’s Santa Ana, Tustin, and Lemon Heights Criss Cross City Directory and Classified Yellow Book.

ProQuest
1920 Detroit, Mich.: Proquest Information and Learning, 2003‐[site continually updated]. Original material from: Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920. (NARA microfilm publication T625, 2076 rolls). Records of the Bureau of the Census, Record Group 29. National Archives, Washington, D.C.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2893 5/5/2026
Chapter 7. Bibliography
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
McAlester, Virginia and Lee
2000 A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, p. 63.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Company
1906 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map of Santa Ana, California.

Los Angeles Public Library online database resources.
1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map of Santa Ana, California.

Los Angeles Public Library online database resources.

Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce
n.d. Map collection, Santa Ana Public Library and History Room. Chiefly 1965 and 1970 city maps of Santa Ana, California.

Santa Ana Register
1959 Santa Ana Industry Up 26 Per Cent. February 1. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping, vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.

Swanner, Charles D.
1953 Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870‐1910. Claremont, CA: Saunders Press
Walker, Doris
1989 Orange County, a Centennial Celebration: Sections of Orange. Houston:

Pioneer Publications.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2894 5/5/2026
Chapter 7. Bibliography
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2895 5/5/2026
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 8-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 8 Preparers’ Qualifications
The preparers of this HRER are alphabetically listed below.

Carson Anderson, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Anderson has a master’s degree in architectural history from the University of Virginia and a bachelor’s degree in architecture from the University of California, Berkley. He has more than 20 years of experience in conducting architectural/historic surveys, including Section 106 and CEQA compliance research and analysis.

Jessica B. Feldman, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Ms. Feldman has a master’s degree in historic preservation from Columbia University and a bachelor’s degree in history and art history from William Smith College. She has more than 13 years of experience in conducting architectural/historic surveys, including Section 106 and CEQA compliance surveys.

Elizabeth Hilton, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Ms. Hilton has a master’s degree in historic preservation from the Art Institute of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in historic preservation and community planning from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. She has more than 8 years of experience in conducting architectural/historic surveys, including Section 106 and CEQA compliance surveys.

Stephen D. Mikesell, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Mikesell has a master’s of arts degree in history from the University of California, Davis and a bachelor’s of arts degree in history from Harvard University.

He has more than 20 years of experience in the field of historic preservation.

Mark Robinson, co‐principal investigator archaeology (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Robinson has bachelor’s degree in geology and history from the University of Montana and a master’s degree in Anthropology from the University of Oregon, and more than 30 years of experience conducting NEPA/SEP, and CEQA compliance work survey work, lithic material identification and analysis, and conducting pre‐historic‐ and historic‐related research.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2896 5/5/2026
Chapter 8. Preparers’ Qulaifications
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 8-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Paul Shattuck, archaeologist (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Shattuck has a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from the University of California, Los Angeles with more than 18 years of experience doing prehistoric and historic archaeology related research and survey work.

Rick Starzak, principal architectural historian, consultant with ICF International. Mr.

Starzak has a master’s of art degree in architecture from the University of California, Los Angeles and more than 30 years of experience in the field of historic preservation consulting.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2897 5/5/2026
Appendix
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2898 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2899 5/5/2026
Appendix A
Department of Parks and
Recreation Forms: DPR 523
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2900 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2901 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Other Identifier:
*
Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted a. County
b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ; R ; 1/4 of 1/4 of Sec ; B.M. c. Address City Zip
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear feature) Zone , mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g. parcel #, legal description, directions to resource, elevation, additional UTMs, etc. as app * P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) * P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) * P4. Resources Present:

The primary façade is symmetrically aligned and three bays wide. The main entrance is accessed through a central porch that is capped by a side gable roof supported by columns. Flanking the entrance is a double-hung wood frame window. Landscaping consists of a grass lawn with mature trees and bound by a metal fence.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1900 , 1901 TRW/Experian
Daniel R. Brimlow
1820 NW Carty Road
Ridgefield, WA 98642
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2902 5/5/2026
1019 E Washington Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1019 E Washington Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: Colonial Revival
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1900.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Esparza, an orange picker for the Irvine Company. At that time, Augstin resided here with his wife, Tibusia. Research did not indicate that Mr. Esparza or his wife are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 1019 E.

Washington Street is a good, but not exceptional, example of residential architecture; it lacks high artistic values as well as integrity of feeling and setting. 1019 E. Washington Street is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.
1954 City Directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2903 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The one-story residence at 1042 Lincoln Avenue in Santa Ana has medium-pitch, side-gable roof with a small extension over the entry on the north side of the primary façade. The front façade, which faces east, has three bays, with the entry at the north corner.

The fenestration consists of a single, two-over-two, double-hung wood sash at the south end and a tripartite window with a multipane fixed center sash flanked by two narrow, two-over-two, wood sash windows. The exterior is clad in wide wood clapboard.

There are vertical wood slats with rounded ends in the gable ends. The entry door is obscured by a metal security door. There is a second, single-family house at the rear of the property which was not observed during survey. The property has a wood picket fence on a concrete base along the street boundary and an automatic metal gate at the driveway entrance. There is a large mature tree in the front yard.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1950 Building Permit
Abelardo Mata & Julieta Zuniga
1044 Lincoln Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2904 5/5/2026
1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style:

Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1950.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that any of the aforementioned residents of the property are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of residential architecture; it lacks high artistic value as well as integrity of setting and feeling. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.
1923, 1933, 1954 City directories
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2905 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1922 Building Permit
Ruben Parga
PO Box 1960
Garden Grove, CA 92842
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2906 5/5/2026
1030 Lincoln Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1030 Lincoln Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: National
Construction History:

Building permit #7981 was issued in 1922 to H. Parga. In 1950, a permit was issued to Parga for asbestos siding. A garage was permitted in 1953. A "Use & Occupancy" permit was issued for a body & fender shop here, under a 1 year temporary basis in 1958. Permit for reroofing in 1982.

Moved? Santiago Street
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: SF Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:

The house was sold to Mr. Parga for $25 and was rolled to the site on telegraph poles, with the help of barrio residents. There was not enough money to build a solid foundation, so walnut tree stumps were used. b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1922 Property Type SF Architecture Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) According to the 1906 Sanborn Map, there was a two-story dwelling at 1030 Lincoln Avenue, with a garage at the southwest corner of the property. However, according to the building permit, the dwelling at this address was constructed in 1922 and was owned by H. Parga. According to the 1920 US Census records, Hilano Parga, 46, was a laborer and head of his household. The 1923 city directory identified the occupants at this address as Hilarion Parga and Roman Echerarria. Mr. Echerarria was a boarder. Many residential properties in the former Logan Barrio community continued to be occupied by members of the Parga family. In the 1933 city directory, Hilario, owned and occupied this property. At the rear lived Sustinos Pena. In 1954, Henry M.

Parga, a laborer, and his wife Louisa lived at this address. At the rear of the property was Nicholas Saldivar, also a laborer, and his wife Orlencia. According to city permit records, this property was temporarily converted to use as a body and fender shop around 1958. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore, it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the CRHR under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that Mr. Parga, immediate family or tenants are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1030 Lincoln Avenue ineligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or the CRHR under Criterion 2. 1030 Lincoln Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of residential architecture; it lacks some integrity of materials and design, and has been expanded. Furthermore, the property has been converted from a residential use to a mixed use property and lacks integrity of feeling, setting and association. 1030 Lincoln Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the NRHP or Criterion 3 of the CRHR. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1920 US Census Records Maria Garcia, Logan Barrio, p. 29.

State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2907 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Despite having multiple storefronts, the entire building is connected. 915-921 Santiago Street has a lower roof profile and is set back from the plane of 923-941 Santiago Street's primary façade. It has been clad in T11 siding, all windows are fixed pane with false muntins, and all doors appear to be hollow core, multi-panel replacements. The overhanging roof eave provides some shelter to storefronts. 923-941 Santiago Street has a staggered and varied parapet, obscuring a medium/high-pitch side gable roof with monitors along the roof peak. The building may be of concrete block construction based on the exposed gable ends. The modified storefronts contain no original fenestration; windows are typically fixed or sliding metal sash. Some storefronts are differentiated with the application of different cladding, such as brick veneer and T11 siding. The property allows for no green landscaping; there is a gravel parking area in front of 915-921 Santiago Street.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
3 Santa Ana 92701
1950 Building Permit
Scott LLC
PO Box 4465
Palm Springs, CA 92263
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2908 5/5/2026
915-941 N Santiago Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 915-941 N Santiago Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
923-1941 N. Santiago Street was constructed in 1950, as a five unit office & shops building. The owner was Ferris H. Scott. The building permit is #4552. No building permit was located for 915-921 N. Santiago Street, but additions to this building, which is located on the same parcel as 923-941, were noted in 1955. The owner of this building was also Ferris Scott.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1950 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) These parcels, which occupy the block on the east side of Santiago Street, between Stafford and Vance, were vacant when the Santa Ana Sanborn Maps were published in 1906. At that time, Santiago Avenue was known as “C” Street. When the maps were revised in the late 1940s, there was a street name change and a rectangular building at the corner of Vance and Santiago was occupied by a carpenter’s shop. This one-story, reinforced concrete building was located at 1035 Santiago Street. In the 1954 city directory, there is no information about 915-921 Santiago Street. However, there are individual businesses listed between 923 and 941 Santiago Street. Ayres Scale Models, Inc. occupied the storefront at 923-925 Santiago Street. T.J. Ayres was the President, Jack McDavid was the Vice-President and Mrs. L.C. Ayres was the Secretary-Treasurer of this firm. It is not known if these persons were directly involved or associated with this office. At 929 Santiago Street was Appliance Manufacturing Company, which may have been a garden tools manufacturer or retailer. 933 Santiago Street was occupied by Danz-Schmidt Workshop.

Louis J. Danz was identified as the president of this company, and F.W. Schmidt was identified as the Vice-President of this company, which sold pianos and related musical instruments. It is not clear if they also manufactured pianos. Bullock’s Furniture and Refinishing was located at 935 Santiago Street; Leonce C. Bullock was the proprietor. Warren & Wright Electric(al) Service occupied 937 Santiago Street. This company was run by C.W. Poore & E.O. Wright. At 939 Santiago Street was Mastercraft Company, which made ceramic molds. J.G. Zitterman, Jr. was the owner. And lastly, at 941 Santiago Street, were the offices of the Orange County Builders Association (OCBA). See Continuation Sheet.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1954 city directory Southern California Builders Association. Www.

Socalbuilders.org/history.html
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
32 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2909 5/5/2026
Page of * Resource Name or #: 915-941 N Santiago Street State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HR #
3 Trinomial
(Assigned by recorder
* Recorded by: Elizabeth Hilton * Date: 8/23/2011
Continuation Update
3 B10. Significance Statement, Continued:

According to the history page of the website for the Southern California Builders Association (www. socalbuilders.org/history.html), the Southland Builders Exchange merged with (OCBA) in 1983 and formed the SCBA. Further research revealed that the original name of the OCBA was the Orange County Builders Exchange, which was founded in the early 1920s. The organization commissioned a building in 1928, which was constructed at 200 North Main Street, in downtown Santa Ana. The group became the OCBA in 1938. It is likely that the address on Santiago Street housed a satellite office of the organization.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. A variety of industrial and commercial business have been associated with this property over the years. At this time, there is no one directly associated with the property considered to be important at the local, state or national level, making the entire address ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value, and appears to have lost integrity of materials, design and workmanship due to storefront modifications. It is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register.

This property was not evaluated for local designation.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required Information
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2910 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1920
Payam & Laila Jahangiri
2109 S Wright Street #F
Santa Ana, CA 92705
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2911 5/5/2026
915 N Logan Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 925 N Logan Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style:

Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1920.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.
1923, 1933, 1954 City Directories
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2912 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

It has an overall square footprint. The primary façade, facing west, has two large bays containing the main entrance and full length windows. Both bays are protected by full size metal security bars. The exterior is clad in rough-texture stucco. The south wall extends towards the street and past the plane of the primary façade. There is a low, flat roof extension on the south side, providing a sheltered area. The designed landscape in front of the building displays low concrete walls, and low trimmed hedges.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
West elevation, view East.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1960 Building Permit
Southern California Acquisitions
921 N Logan Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2913 5/5/2026
923 N Logan Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 923 N Logan Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #11909 was issued to Castelan & Berry in 1960 for an office & shop building at this location.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Four single-family, one-story dwellings appear at this address on Map sheet 20 of the 1949 revised Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana. 923 Logan Street appears at the front of the property. Immediately to the south is a rectangular garage. Behind the garage is 923½ Logan Street. At the back of the property are 921 and 921½ Logan Street. The 1954 city directory shows that Juan Diaz, a picker at Orange Citrus, and his wife Ursula, lived at 923 Logan Street. It is not known when the residences were demolished and removed from the property. The current industrial building was constructed in 1960. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the CRHR under Criterion 1. No specific persons associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 923 Logan Street ineligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or the CRHR under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the NRHP or Criterion 3 of the CRHR. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1920 US Census records 1923, 1933, 1954 city directories; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2914 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The property at 915-917 N. Logan Street has two residential buildings. The front building is a one-story, single-family residence designed in the gable-front-and-wing style. It has a high-pitch, cross-gable and hipped roof with a shallow eave. The exterior has been reclad in non-original stucco. The windows appear to have been replaced with metal sliding sash and resized. There is a fullwidth front porch on the primary (west) façade, with a dropped, hipped roof. The roofs are covered by composition shingle. The porch roof is supported by wood posts and has a raised, poured concrete foundation. The property is partially bounded by a chain link fence. Inside the fence the landscape consists of tall, trimmed hedges and fruit trees.

The rear property is a one-story single family residence designed in the elements of the Craftsman style. Rectangular in plan, it is capped by a front-gable roof with overhanging eaves and clad in clapboard siding. The façade is asymmetrically aligned and obscured from view due to the carport located to the north of the main (front) residence. Alterations include a front porch and an aluminum sliding window.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1923 Building Permit
Bob & Balbino Billa
917 N Logan Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2915 5/5/2026
915-917 N Logan Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 915-917 N Logan Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: Craftsman
Construction History:

The original permit for a residence at this location dates to 1923.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: SF Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1923 Property Type SF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 1906 Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana shows a small, square, one-story dwelling at this address. A small rectangular, one-story secondary structure was also site on the north side of the parcel. According to the 1923 city directory, Jesus Florez lived at this address. There was no Jesus Florez in the 1920 US Census; however, additional research identified the owner/occupant of 917 Logan Street to be Raymond Flores at the time of the census. Raymond, and his son George (20) are both listed as laborers, cement. Besides George, three additional children lived at this address: Carmela (16), Frank (12) and a daughter (10). Also at this address:60 year old grandparents but their names are not legible either. In the 1933 city directory, Jesus Flores was identified as the owner and occupant of this property. Living at the rear of the property was Juan Cruz. The revised 1949 Sanborn map shows four buildings at 917-919 Logan Street. Two are situated near the street and are single-family, one-story houses. 917 ½ Logan Street, located in the north/center part of the property is a one-story rooming house. At the rear of the property is 917A Logan Street, another single-family, one-story house. Per the 1954 city directory, R.G. Billa owned and lived here. Robert Billa was a laborer at El Toro. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the CRHR under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that any persons of significance at the local, state, or national level are associated with this property, making 915-917 Logan Street ineligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or the CRHR under Criterion 2. This property lacks integrity of materials, design, workmanship, setting and feeling and is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the NRHP or Criterion 3 of the CRHR. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1920 US Census records 1923, 1933, 1954 city directories; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2916 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Formerly located at 937 Riverine, 926 Lincoln Street was moved to this location in 1947. This modest Craftsman style residence has a rectangular footprint, with a side-gable roof clad in composition sheeting. The wide, overhanging eaves have curved brackets. The roof pitch is extended over the inset center entry and raised porch. The exterior is clad in narrow clapboard with end boards. The primary façade faces east towards the railroad tracks. The entrance, whose door is obscured by a metal security door, is flanked on each side by a single wood frame casement window. The light arrangement, seen in other windows on the house, consist of four small panes over a large fixed pane. This pattern is repeated in the triple windows to either side of the porch. The porch roof is supported by thick wood posts with flattened capitals and a solid balustrade clad in narrow wood clapboard. The entry is accessed by several brick steps; the foundation also appears to be constructed of brick. The property is surrounded by a high, chain link fence (on Lincoln Avenue) and concrete block wall (on the north and south sides). Inside the perimeter is a welltended lawn, mature trees and small bushes and shrubs.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c 1920
Abdon Vasquez
926 Lincoln Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2917 5/5/2026
926 Lincoln Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 926 Lincoln Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: Craftsman Bungalow
Construction History:

Building permit #9146 issued for a residence in 1947, moved from another location. Owner was Gregorio & Mary Villagomez.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that Mr. Villagomez or his wife are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 926 Lincoln Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 926 Lincoln Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of a side-gable Craftsman bungalow. Furthermore, confusion about its construction mean it may lack integrity of location, setting, feeling and association. 926 Lincoln Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1954 city directory 1920 US Census records; Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2918 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Asymmetrically divided on the east elevation, it features three large garage openings with metal roll-up doors.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1955 TRW/Experian
Santa Ana Industrial Co
1102 E Washington Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2919 5/5/2026
1102-1112 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1102-1112 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1955. The property has a secondary address on Washington Boulevard Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2920 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1956 Building Permit
Katherine T Swiatek
4008 Channel Place
Newport Beach, CA 92663
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2921 5/5/2026
1024-1026 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1024-1026 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1024 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1956 (Permit #2011). It was constructed as an industrial building, measuring 100' x 123' 10". The owner was William D. Greschner and Fred Bennett.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1956 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William D. Greschner or Fred Bennett, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2922 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

None of the doors were observed during survey; both personnel doors have metal security doors. To the south of the left-side entry is long, rectangular paired window set with sliding metal sash.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1956 Building Permit
Dale E. Swiatek
305 Vaquero Road
Arcadia, CA 91007
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2923 5/5/2026
1022 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1022 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1022 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1956 (Permit #1995). It was constructed as a 50' x 100' industrial building. The owner was Robert Oakes.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1956 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner Robert Oakes, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1022 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2924 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1954 Building Permit
Dale E Swiatek
305 Vaquero Road
Arcadia, CA 91007
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2925 5/5/2026
1020 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1020 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1020 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1954-55 (Permit #8108). It was constructed as a warehouse building. The owner was William Greschner.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1954 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William D. Greschner, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1020 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2926 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The exterior is clad in smooth stucco. The single door main entry is set off-center and has a metal security door. To the left of the main entry is long, rectangular metal frame window. The window type is obscured by metal security bars. The primary façade, which faces east, exhibits a large garage-style roll-up metal door to the right of the main entry. There is no landscaping associated with this building.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1954 Building Permit
Richard A. Preston
10 Plaza SQ
Orange, CA 92866
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2927 5/5/2026
1016 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1016 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1016 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1954 (Permit #7572). It was constructed as an addition to a warehouse, either 1008-1012 or 1020 N.

Fuller. The owner was William D. Greschner.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1954 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William D. Greschner, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction.

It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2928 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

To the north is a pedestrian entrance flanked to the south by two small rectangular windows. The south and north elevations join neighboring buildings, all of which abut the concrete sidewalk along Fuller Street HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1953 Building Permit
Michael Alan Freedman
PO Box 50786
Irvine, CA 92619
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2929 5/5/2026
1012 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1012 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed by owner Wm. Grechner for $40,000 in 1953 as a warehouse building (Permit #6532) in combination with 1008 N Fuller Street.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1953 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William Grechner, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1012 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 9/8/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2930 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Rectangular in plan, this building is one-story in height and designed in a utilitarian Modern design. Clad in stucco siding, it is capped in a barrel vaulted roof. The east elevation facades Fuller Street and is punctuated by a large elephant door. To the north is a pedestrian entrance flanked by a small rectangular window. The south elevation faces a large parking lot and is characterized by a band of metal roll-up elephant doors. The building abuts the concrete sidewalk along Fuller Street.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1953 Building Permit
Michael Alan Freedman Corp.

PO Box 50786
Irvine, CA 92619
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2931 5/5/2026
1006-1008 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1006-1008 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed by owner Wm. Grechner for $40,000 in 1953 as a warehouse building (Permit #6532) in combination with 1012 N Fuller Street.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1953 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William Grechner, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1006-1008 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 9/8/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2932 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
1 Santa Ana 92701
c. 1946
Michael Alan Freedman
PO Box 50786
Irvine, CA 92619
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Steve Mikesell
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2933 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2934 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2935 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2936 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2937 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2938 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2939 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2940 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2941 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

It has a low-pitched front-gable roof and is composed of concrete block. The primary façade is sheltered by a metal awning with slender metal column supports. The fenestration is asymmetrically aligned, punctuated by two metal doors and four fixed windows. The parcel is bound by a cyclone fence topped with barbed wire.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southwest elevation, view northeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1938
Corniche Development Corp.
1681 Loma Roja
Santa Ana, CA 92705
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2942 5/5/2026
1143 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1143 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1953.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1953 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The property is not strongly related to the development of a road system in Orange County and that association alone is not sufficient to meet Criterion A, as suggested in the 2004 evaluation designation for 1102 E. Fruit Street. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore, it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1143 Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks overall high artistic value and contains a very modest building in design, form and construction. The property is not an important example of industrial design and is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2943 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
1207 E Fruit Street
Map Reference #18
Orange
1207 E Fruit St
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-101-01, 398-101-15, 398-101-16 T 5 R 9 SEC 7 POR E1/2. 1207 E. Fruit Street in Santa Ana is the location of the Phoenix House, a non-profit provider of substance abuse services. The primary building on the property is a one-story, Spanish Colonial Revival building with a cross-gable, red tile roof. Aerial views show that the building footprint is an "O" with a central open courtyard. The primary façade consists of the side-gable central block and two front-gable wings. The central block displays five large arched windows. These five windows are directly below a shallow pent roof with exposed rafter tails and wood brackets. To either side of the main window set are two projecting, flat-roof entrance porticos with arched openings. Six steps with metal railings lead to the entry porticos, under which are double-door sets topped with blind arches. To the outside of each portico are a set of two, smaller, arched windows with similar pane arrangement seen in the center five bays of the central block. The side-gable roof extends down over these windows. All windows have protruding sills, which are in alignment. The wings have a setback from the porticos, but still project beyond the plane of the central block. Each wing has a round window in the gable end. Fenestration on the wings, facing the street, consist of two arched windows, followed by a large inset arch with a double-hung sash. At the far ends of the wings are two narrow, double-hung sash windows. All fenestration appears to be replacement sash. The building is clad with battered stucco. It is set back from the street, with a circular drive in between. There is a grassy area between the drive and the street. The landscape around the main building is fully developed with different varietals of mature palms, trimmed hedges and rose bushes behind a low brick garden wall. The HP06 1-3 story commercial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
South elevation, view north.
3 Santa Ana 92701
1923 , 1952 Building Permit
Phoenix hHuses of California Inc
11600 Eldridge Avenue
Sylmar, CA 91342
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2944 5/5/2026
Phoenix House
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1207 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name: Detention Home of Orange County, McMillan School, "Juvenile Home/Hall" Common Name
Original Use: Commercial
Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
Construction History:

The Detention Home of Orange County was constructed circa November 1923. No permit was issued as the building was owned by Orange County. Building permit #12566 issued in 1925, possible addition or new structure. Reroofed in 1936. Story added in 1943. New building constructed in 1997, building permit 10113305.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Commercial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Commercial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1923 Property Type Commercial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The Detention Home of Orange County was constructed circa 1923, at a cost of more than $42,000. A second building or an addition, costing $33,290 was built on the premises in 1925. The 1949 Sanborn Map shows two buildings at this location. By 1952, there were three buildings on the property with a total of 26 rooms. Another building is known to have been constructed in 1997. At that time, the operators of the facility, Phoenix House - Orange County, noted that there was a total of 8 buildings on site. Building A is the one that is visible from the public right-of-way and was constructed in the early 1920s. Building B consisted of three portable structures, circa 1996. The dates of construction for Buildings C-H are unknown. 1207 Fruit Street is currently occupied by the Phoenix House, which is a private non-profit provider of substance abuse services.

Phoenix House, which operates facilities in eleven states and the District of Columbia, was founded in 1967. The original building on the property was likely constructed in the early 1920s; because the property was owned by Orange County there is no building permit and the parcel was considered tax-exempt. The address does not appear in the 1922 city directory, but is noted as the Orange County Juvenile Detention Home in the 1933 city directory. 1207 Fruit Street was listed as the County Juvenile Hall in the 1954 city directory. The Spanish Colonial Revival style building, which is the only one currently visible from the public right-ofway, appears on Map sheet 32 of the 1949 revised Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana. The one-story building is constructed with a central courtyard divided down the center by a concrete wall. A kitchen and dining room were identified on the north side (rear) of the building. See Continuation Sheet.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
32 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2945 5/5/2026
Page of * Resource Name or #: 1207 E Fruit Street
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HR #
3 Trinomial
(Assigned by recorder
* Recorded by: Elizabeth Hilton * Date: 8/23/2011
Continuation Update
3 B10. Significance Statement, continued:

The Sanborn Map also shows what appears to be a fence around part of the building, and extending back, or north, in the property. It was not visible during the field survey, although there is a chain link fence part of the property today. Only one other building was shown on the parcel in the 1940s Sanborn map - a rectangular one-story reinforced concrete building identified as the tool house. This building was no longer in existence by 2011. It is not known when it was removed, or if it was moved elsewhere on the property. Phoenix House has subsequently constructed additional buildings on the property.

The period of significance would 1923 to 1951, the period when the original building was constructed and when the Orange County Juvenile Hall program was expanded (Orange County Department of Education, 2005).

Research did not provide additional details regarding the origins of this specific Orange County juvenile hall or the operation of this facility since it was constructed in the early 1920s. No additional information about the founding of a juvenile hall program in the county or in Santa Ana was found during research into local history. It is not known if this was the first building associated with the agency, its choice for this location or the choice of this architecture style. It is not known why this style and type of building was chosen because there is little to no information available on its original construction of subsequent operation. No permit was available for the construction of the original building.

The property is not associated any longer with Orange County's juvenile services programs. By the late 1950s, additional facilities were in use for a boy's ranch and a home for neglected and abused children (Orange County Department of Education, 2005). In 1951, the property at 1207 E. Fruit Street became the David R. McMillian School and in 1959, the juvenile hall was moved to a different site. At that time, the McMillan School was converted to a long-term treatment facility for delinquent youth, and was operated by the Orange County Probation Department (Orange County Department of Education, 2005). Mr.

McMillan had been the county's chief probation officer for more than 20 years when the property was rededicated in his name.

Both the entire property as a whole and the 1920s main building lack integrity of materials, design, workmanship, setting, feeling and association.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with the main building or property as a whole. There is no known association with a particular movement towards the housing and rehabilitation of minors who needed to be housed somewhere other than home or jail.

Therefore neither the 1920s building, nor the entire property is eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No architect was identified as having been associated with its original design; no person was identified as being associated with the development of this property. Therefore, it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion 2 or the California Register under Criterion B.

The main building has been altered with the replacement of its windows and the construction of interior buildings within the courtyard. Over time, the property has been modified by the construction of new buildings, none of which match or compliment the original 1923 Spanish Colonial Revival style building. There was no clear pattern of development or use of the property, either by the county or by authorities with experience in the housing of delinquent or neglected youths. It does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required Information
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2946 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1952 Building Permit
Maria & Luciano Marquez
1215 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2947 5/5/2026
1215 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1215 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Multi-Family Residential
Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional
Construction History:
1215-1217 E. Fruit Street was constructed in 1952. Building permit #2888 was issued to owner H. M. Grimes, Jr. & Others for "4 Unit Apartments & Garages".

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Multi-Family Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1952 Property Type MF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The property at the northwest corner of N. Grand Avenue and E. Fruit Street was originally a large parcel identified as 1225 Fruit Street in the 1949 revised Sanborn Maps (Map sheet #32). At that time, it contained a large two-story house with an irregular footprint and a large one-story secondary structure. This property may have been occupied by a farmhouse and associated barn/garage/stable. By the mid-1950s, it had been subdivided. Kenneth Maynard (USMC) and his wife Marilyn were residing at 1215 Fruit Street in 1954. Living at 1215½ Fruit Street was D.A. Malmstrom, Jr. and his wife Mary. Delvin Malmstrom was a clerk at Del-N-Dick (or Dell-N-Dick) Produce, located at 814 N. 17th Street in Santa Ana.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that any past occupants of the property are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1215 E. Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 1215 E. Fruit Street has lost integrity of materials and design, due in part to the replacement of the windows and modification of the window openings. It is also not a significant example of a multi-family Minimal Traditional style residence. 1215 E. Fruit Street is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1954 city directory Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2948 5/5/2026
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 1 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Prior Evaluations of the Orange County Highway Department Maintenance Yard The Orange County Highway Department Maintenance Yard (hereafter Maintenance Yard) at 1102-1111 East Fruit Street in Santa Ana, California was evaluated twice in 2004. In the first instance, it was found not to qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP/National Register). In the second instance, it was found to qualify under Criteria A and C.

In 2004, the County of Orange was planning construction of a Santa Ana Art Wall project near the Maintenance Yard. Although it was an entirely different project from the current grade separation undertaking, the area of potential effect (APE) for the Art Wall project included some of the same potential properties as the current undertaking, including the Maintenance Yard. In relation to the Art Wall project, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) on behalf of Orange County, with historic studies prepared by Christeen Taniguchi of Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) (California Department of Transportation, District 12, Historic Property Survey Report, Santa Ana Art Wall Project, 8/26/2004.). The DPR 523 form for the Maintenance Yard is attached, identified as 2004 DPR-1.

In mid-November, 2004, OHP assigned review of this project to an employee of Caltrans Headquarters in Sacramento who was assisting OHP to help review Section 106 documents. On November 22, Caltrans District 12 notified MBA that this employee, acting on behalf of OHP, had questions about the HPSR as it pertained to the Maintenance Yard. On December 2, 2004, Christeen Taniguchi responded to the questions raised following a conversation with the OHP reviewer, and stated that she had “revisited the facts and made this change in eligibility” referring to her decision to classify the Maintenance Yard as “potentially eligible for the NRHP and CR.”( E-mail from Christeen Taniguchi to Dana Supernowicz, “Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 2, 2004.)” On December 6, 2004, an email exchange between Taniguchi and OHP suggested she reconsider her finding, which had identified the Maintenance Yard as being not eligible under Criterion A (E-mail from Dana Supernowicz to Christeen Taniguchi, “Re:

Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 6, 2004.) On December 14, 2004, the County resubmitted a revised HPSR and new DPR 523 forms, concluding the Maintenance Yard was eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criteria A and C. The DPR form for this property retained the 6z code (not eligible for the National Register) but the text within the form supported National Register eligibility under both criteria. The second 2004 DPR form is reproduced below, as 2004 DPR-2. On December 27, 2004, OHP concurred in the finding that the Maintenance Yard is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criteria A and C.

Rationale for Re-Evaluation of Property at 1102 East Fruit Street, Santa Ana In both 2004 versions of the DPR 523 forms, the property was evaluated as a potential historic district. The final DPR package included the Primary Record, a District Record, and continuation sheets for description and evaluation. In accordance with the instructions for recordation, the final package should also have included a Primary Record for each building within the district; however, this was not included in the package. The inclusion of the District Record form indicates the intent to treat the property as a potential historic district, and the term “District” is used at several places within the document, but not in the evaluation language through which the eligibility criteria for the National Register were applied to this property. The 2004 evaluation did not take into account other buildings and parcels associated with the Maintenance Yard that were outside of the project area. In light of this, it is necessary to take a new look at the eligibility for the property.

Another concern regarding the determination of eligibility as a historic district is the recordation of only those buildings that were 50 years old at the time of the evaluation. However, there are several newer buildings that were not treated as being part of the property. There are, within the property being evaluated, three buildings that are less than 50 years old, two of which are very large, joining the seven buildings that are more than 50 years old. The only text that addresses these buildings states: “There are also three buildings/structures in the APE that are less than 50 years old. With reference to Exhibit 3 of the HRER, they are notes as: x) a 1960 gas station located at the northeast corner of the property, which replaced a dwelling noted on the 1945 Sanborn map; y) a circa-1980/1990 truck storage building located on the southeast section of the property, replacing an earlier building that existed in the 1928 and 1938 aerial photographs; and z) a post-1970 era open shed located at the southwest corner of the RDMD property. These are not evaluated as part of the District due to age and a historical lack of connection between the historic elements.”
The property being evaluated is 1102-1111 East Fruit Street, Santa Ana, which is described as bounded by Fruit Street, Terminal Street, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)/Metrolink right of way, and a parking lot to the south. This property includes ten buildings: the seven discussed in these forms and the three that are not evaluated.

In applying the instructions for DPR 523 District Records, and in applying the more detailed instructions for recording historic districts in the National Park Service guidelines, the recordation and evaluation of the property does not appear to be accurate.

The resource is the Maintenance Yard, which comprises the older buildings as well as those built between 1960 and 1990. The presence of newer and older buildings affects the integrity of the entire property as well as its eligibility under Criteria A and C. This apparent misapplication of historic district inventory and evaluation methodology supports the need to entertain a new, de novo, evaluation of the property.
(See Continuation Sheet)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2949 5/5/2026
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 2 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
In addition to leaving out the newer buildings at the 1111 and 1102 addresses, the evaluation did not include two large buildings at street addresses 1143 and 1140 East Fruit Street, which have been a part of the Maintenance Yard. These buildings, described below, are on separate Assessor’s Parcels but are functionally a part of the Maintenance Yard. The fact that these buildings were not discussed in the 2004 evaluation supports the need to take a new look at the National Register eligibility of this property.

New Evaluation
The Maintenance Yard does not appear to qualify for listing in the NRHP because it is not significant and because it lacks integrity.

The following discussion presents a historic context for maintenance stations as a property type and then analyzes the property according to the three directly applicable National Register Criteria: A (historic events); B (historic persons); and C (design).

Historic Context for Highway Maintenance Stations
In California, highway construction and maintenance was the responsibility of City and County governments until the formation of the California Division of Highways in the early 20th century. By the 1920s, a formal arrangement had been established through which major through highways were assigned to the Division of Highways while counties were responsible for lesser through routes and cities the city streets (The early history of city, county, and state highways is summarized in Ben Blow, California Highways: A Descriptive Record of Road Development by the State and by Such Counties as Have Paved Highways, 1920. An excellent summary of the situation about 30 years later is found in California Highways and Public Works, Centennial Edition, September 9, 1950.)
The assigned responsibility included construction as well as maintenance of roads. The maintenance responsibility eventually led the Division of Highways to develop the maintenance station as a functional property type, as a place to store maintenance equipment and materials to enable timely delivery of crews, material, and equipment to needed highway projects. The Division of Highways was the principal developer of maintenance stations because it was responsible for thousands of miles of highways, many of which were in remote locations. The distances between equipment sheds and road locations were far smaller for cities and most counties; as a result, the maintenance station as a property type is more closely associated with state rather than city or county highway maintenance organizations.

In January 2000, James Fisher, historian with Caltrans Headquarters, prepared a context statement for maintenance stations of the California Division of Highways, forerunner of today’s Caltrans (James Fisher, “Inventory and Evaluation of Facilities Owned by The California Department of Transportation: Maintenance Stations,” January 2000.). The need for highway maintenance stations grew with the development of maintained, generally paved roads in the late 1910s and 1920s. The Division of Highways began to build permanent maintenance stations in the early 1920s when it became clear that it was less expensive to own than to rent maintenance vehicles and that the vehicles were subject to vandalism and weather damage if left along the roadside.

The State Architect’s office developed a series of “standard plans” for maintenance stations, which could be reproduced at various locations throughout the state. The stations included a series of buildings that were found on essentially all stations, modified to fit the scale of responsibility for the station in question. The State Architect also developed a series of “styles” for these stations that could conform to architectural traditions in various parts of the state: a “Craftsman” style station for Pasadena; a “half-timbered” style for the desert area; a “Spanish” style for coastal Southern California; and so forth (Fisher, p 4.). The state maintenance stations were typically in remote areas and usually included residences: a cottage for the superintendent and bunkhouses for the workers. The station usually included sheds for the equipment, oil and gasoline pumps, sand and gravel yards, and minor equipment repair capabilities.

The Maintenance Yard treated in this report is both similar to and quite different from the state maintenance stations. First, it was built at the edge of Santa Ana, which in the 1920s was the one of the largest cities in Orange County. The facility was built in an industrial area adjoining the railroad tracks. The facility was more of an equipment repair yard than a multi-purpose road maintenance facility, as was commonly the case with the state maintenance yards. And it was not built according to any architectural “style,” as was typically the case with the state yards.

Unfortunately, there is no overall context for county-owned maintenance stations that matches the quality of the Caltrans context for state-owned facilities. Counties, with rare exceptions, are relatively small geographic units, without the need for residential maintenance stations, as were built in large numbers by the state. San Bernardino, a very large county, has organized around selfsustaining road districts in the rural parts of the state, recognizing that the needs for the desert and mountainous parts of the county are quite different (www.specialdistricts.org details how these San Bernardino County special districts operate.). These districts do not, however, necessarily have maintenance stations associated with them. Most counties, including Orange, are sufficiently small as to maintain their roadways from centralized equipment and material yards, to which county workers commute from their private residences.
(See Continuation Sheet)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2950 5/5/2026
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 4 ends

Santa Ana City CouncilMay 5, 2026

Santa Ana City Council
May 5, 2026